By Lee Speigel

Sep 9, 2008 8:42pm

A Piggish Debate

Last October, asked about Sen. Hillary Clinton’s health care plan, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., was blunt.

McCain said Clinton’s proposal was “eerily” similar to the ill-fated plan she devised in 1993.

“I think they put some lipstick on a pig,” he said, “but it’s still a pig.”

A common expression, right?

McCain surely wasn’t calling Clinton a pig.

After all, McCain’s former press secretary, Torie Clarke, wrote a book called "Lipstick on a Pig: Winning in the No-Spin Era."

Elizabeth Edwards told some health journalists that McCain’s health care plan was like “painting lipstick on a pig.”

Tonight Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said of McCain painting himself as a change agent, "You know, you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig."

The crowd rose and applauded.

(Some of them no doubt were thinking he may have been in some way alluding to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s ad lib during her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech last week, "What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.")

"You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called ‘change,’" Obama continued, "it’s still gonna stink after eight years. We’ve had enough of the same old thing! It’s time to bring about real change to Washington.  And that’s the choice you’ve got in this election."

Obama’s campaign insisted that he was not alluding to Palin at all.

"That expression is older than my grandfather’s grandfather," said Obama campaign spox Jen Psaki, "and it means that you can dress something up but it doesn’t change what it is. He was talking pretty clearly about the fact that you can’t just call yourself change when you’ve voted with George Bush 90 percent of the time."

Obama has used the expression before. Last September, around the time McCain said it about Clinton’s health care plan.

"I think that both Gen. Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker are capable people who have been given an impossible assignment," Obama said in a telephone interview. "George Bush has given a mission to Gen. Petraeus, and he has done his best to try to figure out how to put lipstick on a pig."

Why should anyone believe McCain didn’t mean it about Hillary Clinton, but Obama meant it about Palin?

And yet, the inaugural conference call of what the McCain-Palin campaign is calling the "Palin Truth Squad" addressed Obama’s remark.

And interestingly, the Truth Squad call was full of half-truths and statements that weren’t true at all.

Speaking on behalf of the McCain campaign, former Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift tonight flatly stated that Obama had called Palin a pig.

"[T]he formation of the Palin Truth Squad couldn’t have happened too soon, as we saw when Sen. Obama in Lebanon, Va., this evening uttered what I can only deem to be disgraceful comments comparing our vice presidential nominee Gov. Palin to a pig," Swift said.

"Sen. Obama owes Gov. Palin an apology," she said.

Asked why she was so confident Obama was "comparing" Palin to a pig, she said Palin was the only one of the four candidates on both parties’ tickets who wears lipstick.

"She is the only one of the four candidates for president, or the only vice presidential candidate who wears lipstick," Swift said. "I mean, it seemed to me a very gendered comment."

But, Swift added, if "as part of his apology Sen. Obama wants to say, no, he was calling Sen. McCain — who is a true hero in our country — a pig, then I suppose we could wait en masse for an apology to that, as well."

It was pointed out to Swift that, after the line about the pig, Obama had said, "You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called ‘change,’ it’s still gonna stink after eight years."

Swift then suggested that Obama was calling McCain a fish.

"I have a fourth-grader and two second-graders at home," she said. "I would not teach them that this is sort of a high-minded debate on policy issues when they are calling people rotten old fish or a pig. In fact, it sounds a lot like some of the least intelligent debates on the playground sound like at our elementary school."

A reporter then reminded Swift that in December, McCain was asked about criticisms coming his way from then-opponent Gov. Mitt Romney, R-Mass., and McCain replied, "Never get into a wrestling match with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it."

Was McCain calling Romney a pig? a reporter asked Swift.

Of course not, Swift said.

It seems to me we should have one rule. If Obama was calling Palin a pig, then McCain was calling Hillary Clinton one. If McCain wasn’t, then Obama wasn’t.

- jpt

User Comments

I think the truth is that all politicians are animals, be it pigs, fish or dogs.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

You know, if Obama didn’t have a track record of condescension towards female opponents you might persuade me on this one.
But it’s become amply clear that beneath his usual cool facade Obama is an insecure, arrogant and prickly man who isn’t sure what to do when his party’s attempts to smear the opposition don’t result in withdrawl from the race.

Posted by: rkb | September 9, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Mary, well then it is clear that McCain called Hillary Clinton a pig.
Reading the statement, I think he was clearly referring to the McCain campaign’s policies.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

You might want to include that Biden used a similar lipstick line earlier in the day…seems pretty calculated that they are suddenly using “lipstick” to describe negative things.

Posted by: jonathan | September 9, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

The thing is that flowers are good and newspapers are open.

Posted by: Guy | September 9, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

No rational person believes that Obama was referring to Palin. Jake makes an excellent point- if Obama was calling Palin a pig, then McCain was calling Clinton, and Romney a pig. If it was ok for Romney to be called a pig in a much more direct way- why would Palin be off limits? If she wants to play with the big dogs, she needs to learn to get as good as she gives.

Posted by: Jordan | September 9, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Do you really want to talk about sexism here? After all, McCain once cracked this wonderful joke:
“Did you hear the one about the woman who is attacked on the street by a gorilla, beaten senseless, raped repeatedly and left to die? When she finally regains consciousness and tries to speak, her doctor leans over to hear her sigh contently and to feebly ask, ‘Where is that marvelous ape?’” – John McCain @ National League of Cities and Towns in Washington, DC
After all, nothing is funnier than rape to John McCain.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

“It seems to me we should have one rule.”
It doesn’t work that way. It’s called context. Obama’s remark followed too close on the heels of Palin’s remark. Context matters.
On the other hand, with our Fannies on fire, it’s no wonder our heads are catching.

Posted by: len | September 9, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Sorry, but the use was different in the cases.
McCain explicitly referred to Hillary’s health care plan as a pig with lipstick on it.
Obama, however, did not make it clear who/what he was referring it to. In fact, it seems pretty clear that “change” is Palin. And so Obama called Palin a pig with lipstick.
Sorry, you’re wrong on this one Jake. You need a course on logic.

Posted by: JA | September 9, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Aren’t you and other serious journalists getting a little sick of the lies and pandering from the McCain campaign, Jake? And what does this tell us all about what kind of White House they would run?

Posted by: Lisa | September 9, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

Bill Clinton said Obama’s Iraq position is a fairy tale =HE IS RACIST
Eveything else anyone sad was RACIST
I voted for CLinton in the primary. I have not forgotten.

Posted by: geevill | September 9, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

And let’s not forget this wonderful John McCainism:
In his 1992 Senate bid, McCain was joined on the campaign trail by his wife, Cindy, as well as campaign aide Doug Cole and consultant Wes Gullett. At one point, Cindy playfully twirled McCain’s hair and said, “You’re getting a little thin up there.” McCain’s face reddened, and he responded, “At least I don’t plaster on the makeup like a trollop, you c*nt.”
Stones. Glass houses.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

ok – i guess nothing is happening in the world today. this is really stupid.
but then again – given how many times obama’s handlers accused people of being racist, he kinda deserves some heat.

Posted by: Angry Black Democrat | September 9, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Saying that the pig comment is sexist is a fake outrage. What I got when I heard it is a reference to Palin’s history of pork-barrelling politics, in which as a mayor of Wasilla, she hired a lobbyist to game congress for about 25 million dollars for a town of 5000 at the time. Her handwriting and initials are captured on a document that highlighted her success in bringing in pork money for Wasilla. As governor, Palin campaign for office in 2006 as a supporter for the Bridge to nowhere, and she is even captured on a photo proudly raising a Bridge to nowhere sweater. Also, Congress had nixed funding for the project in 2005, and when it was apparent that the Alaska congressional team couldn’t get more pork money from Congress, Palin finally stopped the Bridge to nowhere project. Finally, Palin led the public to believe she returned the pork money, with the phrase “thanks, but no thanks”, when in fact she kept all the money that was allocated, in excess of $200 million. As far as I am concerned, Governor Palin is the queen of pork-barrel politics, and this is what the pig reference is for. Corruption and misspending by government officials concerns citizens, and we must be able to use the language that people understand to refer to corrupt officials, whether they are male or female.

Posted by: p3ng | September 9, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

We now know Obama is a sexist and maybe even a racist. Otherwise why belong to a hate whitey black liberation theology church for twenty years. By the way on the O’reilly interview tonight, Obama admitted he had been present when Rev. Wright made anti white sermons from the pulpit.
McCain/Palin 2008

Posted by: Erin | September 9, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Doesn’t context matter, Jake?
If Hillary had made a now-famous lipstick joke a few days before McCain used the phrase, wouldn’t it be right to question if he was calling her a pig?
Things and politics do not exist in a vacuum, and you understand better than anyone that context matters.

Posted by: mie | September 9, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

I am so tired of McCain’s tactics on launching twisted accusation and crying loud as victim. Why don’t they talk about what McCain will do for the country, I mean lay out something specific. Or have Palin answer some questions herself, instead of reading the material some speech writer wrote for her.

Posted by: CT | September 9, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Jake,
This is the equivalent of Palin uttering “You can put a suit on a monkey but it’s still a monkey”.
If that comment were made, you would be all over it.
Get real!

Posted by: JA | September 9, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

The more Obama keeps it up, the more I am likely to feel a “girl power” moment.I am a white, independent woman who feels more and more kinship to Sarah Palin with each verbal assault that comes her way.

Posted by: Catherine | September 9, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Women please don’t vote for Barack Obama:
OBAMA is NOT GREAT FOR WOMEN
Barack Obama has a history of being involved in bitter campaigns in which his female opponents are threatened with law suits and race baiting, sexist attacks on their characters.
1. In Chicago Obama ruined opponent Alice Palmer’s campaign for Illinois State Senator when he employed crony lawyers to claim signatures on her petition were falsified. Before this Alice Palmer was once Obama’s mentor and had actually aided him in his career. She did not support him during the DNC presidential primary. She supported Hillary Clinton and was later silenced by blacks in Chicago as being a traitor to the black community. I know I am a Chicagoan.
2. During the DNC primary Obama and his minions of Obamabots waged a nasty race baiting campaign against Hillary Clinton. They accused Hillary of “pimping out” her daughter Chelsea and called her a racist. Hillary lost the election. Obama did nothing to stop his followers from spreading rumors of Racism against HRC.
3. Now that Obama has passed over Hillary for the VP spot, He has the audacity to come after Sarah Palin’s experience and attacks her in his stump speeches even though she is not the Pres. Nominee but McCain is. His minions are calling Palin an unfit mother who was chosen by McCain for her attractive looks and youth.
Obama is NOT FOR WOMEN. HIS POLICIES MAY TELL YOU THAT BUT HIS ACTIONS SAY OTHERWISE.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Obama uses a lot of these “plausible deniability” attacks. Obviously, all candidates use the “lipstick on a pig” expression. It’s a common idiom, and it is sort of appropriate to refer to the Republican claims of being about “change.” The Republican agenda is a pig, and despite the attempts to dress it up in the lipstick of being about “change,” it’s still a pig. But still… we can’t help but remember Palin’s “pit bull with lipstick” expression to describe herself.
Similarly, it wasn’t too long ago that McCain said that Obama and Hamas were electoral allies, and Obama shot back saying that McCain had “lost his bearings.” Nothing wrong with that reply in and off itself, but given concerns of McCain’s age, one can’t help but think Obama’s comment reminded people of the expression “lost his marbles” and that this Obama was trying to say this about McCain without really saying it.
My advice to Republicans about this: grow up and stop whining. If you don’t want the common political idiom “lipstick on a pig” to be associated with your candidates, your candidates should go around calling themselves “pitbulls with lipstick.”

Posted by: Tyro | September 9, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

This is Obama’s MO. He gave Hillary the bird and denied it and now he called Palin a pig and denied it. Barry, PUMA’s don’t forget!

Posted by: Grace | September 9, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

This is just getting ridiculous.
Now when someone says “calling the kettle black” that that means that someone is being racist.

Posted by: Angela | September 9, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

I believe in calling a spade a spade.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

McCain did use the same saying when talking about Hillary’s healthcare plan in 2006. It is a common age old saying that is not sexist.

Posted by: phyllis | September 9, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Man, I have never encountered such a delusional group of posters as at this site. How much is the McCain campaign paying you all to write such tripe?

Posted by: CrunchyFrog | September 9, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Gee–I can’t really believe that some of the people on this thread are so patently idiotic. Obama was clearly referring to McCain/Palin’s claim to be agents of change. What’s wrong with you people? Are you really this obtuse? Or just rendered stupid by racism, resentment or ideology?
As for you Hillary die-hards (and I speak as someone who would be just as happy to have her in the White House as Obama, given that their positions are almost identical):
Go ahead. Vote for McCain. You’ll look REALLY stupid without noses on your faces.

Posted by: DRK | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Not enough.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

How did I missed that?
“…Sen. Barack Obama said yesterday in a telephone interview. “George Bush has given a mission to General Petraeus, and he has done his best to try to figure out how to put lipstick on a pig.”
So, as per Obama, General Petraeus has done his best to try to figure out how to put lipstick on a pig.
Humm that’s interesting. Two reference of Lipstick in two days. I think Lipstick is really bothering Obama.

Posted by: Tim | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

What isn’t part of ourselves doesn’t disturb us.
I wonder why the Republicons have all the fake outrage over pretending to believe they have been called pigs.

Posted by: Truth Matters | September 9, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I think that the Senator knew exactly what he was saying. He “periodically” gets angry and just lashes out. Now that he is no longer raising the kind of funds that he needs to compete, now that he has to fly to California to fund raise with Streisand and the rest, it is obvious that he made a HUGE mistake when he dissed matching funds. As his chickens come home to roost, look for him to continue to anger and say things he will regret and for the campaign to have to cover for him. A much needed five or seven days off in Hawaii cannot be far behind.

Posted by: beebop | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

People please get a grip!!! I don’t know why precious Sarah Palin has to be treated with such kid gloves! If she cannot stand the heat, then she needs to get out of the kitchen!! I’m sure that will be interpreted as sexist and unfair to poor, pure, saintly Sarah!! I am SICK of everyone walking around on eggshells around her! She started this with her disgusting speech and countless insults towards Obama at the RNC, and I say don’t dish it out if you can’t take it pit bull with lipstick!!

Posted by: realitycheck | September 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Indepentant in Ohio:
Knew all along that all you Obama supporters were war mongers at heart.

Posted by: sam | September 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

It’s very clear that what Obama referred to as “pig” or “fish” was what he thinks are the same old policies and same old politics that McCain/Palin have been trying to package with lipstick or a piece of paper. Same old policies/ politics couched in the language of change — that’s the point the Obama campaign has been making for some time.
Same thing with McCain when he called Clinton’s health care proposal a pig in lipstick. He didn’t call Clinton a pig.
However, he did seem to suggest that Romney was a pig. Sounds like he owes Romney an apology.
Interstingly, Palin was being sexist when she described hockey moms as pit bulls in lipstick. Can women be sexist (against women)? Yes, of course. She owes all hockey moms who feel offended an apology.

Posted by: chris | September 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

The McCain campign wants nothing to do with the issues, because he has NONE! ZILCH, ZERO. He is hiding behind Sarah Palin’s skirt. He can’t leave home without her. The McCain camp is becoming a bunch of whiners and liars.
Enough!!
They need to stop trying to twist the truth. Tapper, I have been critical of you before, and I am sure I will in the future, when I disagre with you, but THANK YOU for calling a spade a spade.
And thanks to that reporter that called Swift out by telling her that McCain had used the same statement on Romney.
The hypocrisy stinks to the high heaven. Rush Limbaugh and O’Rielly denigrated the young Spears girl and her parents for getting pregnant out of wedlock, but don’t see fit to do the same with Ms. Palin — which I think is none of their business in either case, but it just goes to show their hypocrisy.
Thank you.

Posted by: saybah | September 9, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

SAD – the PUMAS are afraid of being called names

Posted by: jozy | September 9, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Truth Matters: “fake outrage”
OBama’s statement was very stupid. Women have the right to be angry. Obama doesn’t seem so eloquent anymore.
The DNC. An Election Is Ours To Lose and we’re damn good at it.
The Truth Hurts

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Jake Tapper,
Thank you for pointing out the truth. McCain is turning this election into a game.

Posted by: GreenTea | September 9, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

What it’s “kind of like” is the phrase “calling a spade a spade” which, despite some objections by the black community, has absolutely nothing to do with and has never been about racism.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Although many people have said that…considering the high-profile reaction to Palen saying it last week..it is highly offensive that Obama did it — calling a woman a pig.
Remember when Obama mocked Hillary and said, “Who does she think she is?…Annie Oakley?” And he wonders why he is losing.

Posted by: rich | September 9, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Megan McCain:” No one knows what war is like other than my family…period. Nice!I’m sure all the families who have lost loved ones these last 6 years and the troops on their 3rd and 4th tour really appreciate this remark.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

realitycheck, Sarah has not been treated with “kid gloves” Obama has. There has been so many outright lies about Sarah that have been spread by you vicious Obama supporters it is beyond belief.Yet when the truth about Obama comes out, the people in the media suppress it or spin it. The truth is the more you know the truth about Obama the less you like him and the more you know the truth about Palin the more you like her. All I can say is keep spreading the lies and smears about Palin and the public will see through it will just like her even more.

Posted by: sara | September 9, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Republicans need to calm down. Obama is not being original. Cheney used the line 4 YEARS AGO in Hawaii talking about John Kerry.

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Jake, I actually feel sorry for you sometimes to have to wade thru the slew of rotten garbage from the McCain camp.

Posted by: jj | September 9, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

The government jet – not sold on ebay – and sold at a loss – by a broker
The bridge to nowhere – stopped by congress not Palin
The government chef – back on duty cooking for the legislator’s
Filing per dium while living at your own home – less than honest
Fake outrage over words used by McCain himself – against HRC no less
PRICELESS

Posted by: jozy | September 9, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

JohnTX,
I’ve seen the video. After discussing something about the debates/Hillary, he pauses, then scratches his head with his middle finger. Classic.
He knew what he was doing.

Posted by: JA | September 9, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Rich, I’m a bit dense. Could you please explain to me why Obama asking if Hillary Clinton sees herself as Annie Oakley is sexist?
I know people who have asked if McCain sees himself as Wyatt Earp. I’m curious to know if they were sexist too.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

If you read Obama’s WHOLE comment, it begins with “John McCain says he’s about change…” He does NOT reference Palin in his comment. He means John “I voted with President Bush 90% time” McCain trying to dress up his McSame old policies as change is like putting lipstick on a pig. Anyone who claims Obama meant Palin is a pig is being deliberately STUPID and is actually guilty themselves of making the inference.

Posted by: mila | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

John McCain owes Barack Obama an apology. If not, he’s a pig for trying to miscontrue his words – sords that he has used himself against Mitt Romeny and Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: Diamond | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

There is no honor in lying.
John McCain is now a proven liar.
John McCain has no honor.

Posted by: The Zug | September 9, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Concerned in OH
I guess from your post your concerned -
but I guess just not about the real issues

Posted by: jozy | September 9, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Sara—Please!!! Obama has been treated with kid gloves??? He has been run through the ringers since the day he announced–nightly in fact by Sean Hannity. On the other hand, if anyone DARES to try and ask Palin a question, they are accused by the McCain camp as being demeaning to her. Why doesn’t McCain just admit she is being “schooled” now and that’s why she’s unavailable to talk to take questions? The more I see and hear from her, the more I shudder to think she could be first in line for the Presidency if anything happened to McCain (if he wins the election). That should scare everyone in this country–that woman is in no way, shape or form ready to lead on day one!

Posted by: realitycheck | September 9, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

JohnTX,
I am telling you, if you see the video it is clear as day. He’s discussing HRC, pauses and smirks to himself, then scratches his head with his middle finger and the crowd cheers. It’s classic. There is no doubt about it. Sorry. It was childish yes, but not the end of the world.

Posted by: JA | September 9, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Compared to the simply awful things Palin has been saying of Senator Obama, it’s laughable for them to twist his words and whine.
It’s outrageous what Palin has been getting away with!!
To all the Obama haters out there – you’re making this crap up because you want to win at all costs…be objective – he has been nothing but suprememly gracious and polite to every candidate and opponent in the race. Nice to a fault.
The McCainPalin lies have been simply outrageous. How they sleep at night I don’t know.

Posted by: JS Webb | September 9, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Sara; What lies are we spreading about Palin? That she was for the bridge to nowhere before she was against it? That she fired or tried to fire all the dept heads in her little town. That when she tried to get rid of the librarian she almost got recalled.(notice I didn’t accuse her of banning books…that would be a lie…she did question the librarian on her feelings about banning certain books Palin didn’t like..

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Obama would have been alright if Palin has not used the lipstick word as such a big part of her campaigning. Obama is an idiot if he thought he would get away with it, does he think he was being cute?
Why is he attacking Sarah Palin? She is a VP pick he should be going after McCain, he is a moron and he is undercutting himself.

Posted by: Eric B | September 9, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

John McCain is a dishonorable person.
Being a POW does not give you permission to be a liar.
There is no honor in lying.

Posted by: The Zug | September 9, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

Interesting! Republican sleaze merchants and agents of distortion are also crybabies and whiners! Who knew? Typical bully psychology.
LOL — can you say the words “backfire”?

Posted by: Oomingmak | September 9, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

This coming from a woman who compared herself to a dog wearing lipstick last week???
You HAVE to be kidding me. Is this what happens when the GOP suddenly pretends to understand sexism?
“Lipstick on a pig” is an old, somewhat tired Washington cliche. I’m sure that Jon Stewart will pull together how every single commentator has used it at one point– like “thrown under a bus.”

Posted by: zoe from pittsburgh | September 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Tapper:
Are you serious?
Your commentary at the end of the article reads EXACTLY like a democratic talking point.
Truly sad you are showing your true colors of being in the OBama tank the moment the race truly got close.
Sickening.

Posted by: JG | September 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Obama is so far down in the polls that he is resorting to going after the vice president. Um, ah, oh, um, um Obama you’re running for president! Right?

Posted by: Tony | September 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Jake, if you or anyone is actually reading these comments, you might want to link the initial story to this one. Drudge has this thing front and center and he’s rather conveniently chosen to link the story that doesn’t mention McCain’s use of the phrase.
Seems like you’d want to get the full story out there, even if he doesn’t.

Posted by: WS | September 9, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Omentum, still living the fantasy huh?

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Mary go back to your playground at your all-white prep school. Is trying to enter your wife in a topless beauty contest at a biker rally an example of McCain’s respect for women? Sadly a number of silly women are being fooled by McCain’s shiny new toy, but some of us who are still allied with Democratic issues are not fooled just because he throws a uterus our way.

Posted by: mila | September 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

John McCain, from October of 2007.
While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s health-care plan, he (McCain) said it was “eerily reminiscent” of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the early 1990s.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” he said of her proposal.
Was McCain calling Hillary a pig?
I don’t think so.
This election is getting silly. Which would be fine if the country’s problems were silly. But they are serious.

Posted by: pdxdem | September 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

There’s a difference, I believe, in the associations. McCain was referring to a Hillary plan. Obama was referring to Palin herself.
That’s a huge difference, in my opinion. I get what Obama was going for, but really — in the era of having to dance around race issues for Obama’s benefit, why isn’t it incumbent upon us to do the same for this? Unless, of course, that’s the point. Race matters, and gender doesn’t. Seems to me we’ve already been shown this lesson, over and over again.

Posted by: beth | September 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

I am extremely upset at Obama’s sexist slur. Imagine referring to the Republican VP as an “old fish”!

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

It seems to me we should have one rule.
Actually there are two rules. Conservatives can do anything they want because they are inherently better. Everyone else has to follow the rules.
Jane Swift is an illustration as to why conservatives are inherently anti-American.

Posted by: Dr. Squid | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Palin is the new Chatty Cathy Doll…pull her string and she repeats the same thing over and over again. Expected to be the latest craze for xmas. McCain working on a new CD to include drill,surge,POW along with the old standby pitbull with lipstick and bridge to nowhere. Glasses and ornate flag pin included plus instructions on how to decode your daughters from wanting to lie all the time.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Mila, I take that you wouldn’t have done well in the contest.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Obama has flip flopped on everything he stood for. I guess he’s now doing the “silly politics” he was soooooo opposed to.

Posted by: MaryR | September 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

You got to hand it to Obama, he is a new kind of politician. Extremely bad.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Do any of the people on this site like to have a real debate? Seriously, you’re just yelling at each other.

Posted by: JA | September 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

I now get it. McCain is running a kindergarten operation with intellectual zeros at the helm.
And from what I’ve gathered reading some of these posts, simpletons are falling for it left and right.
“Lipstick on a pig” is so old and so cliche, I couldn’t imagine anyone with no more than a seventh-grade education getting caught up in it.
To infer that Palin was the object of the sentiment is really buying, full tilt, into the McCain campaign’s cynicism.
What a poor excuse for a campaign, Senator McCain. A real shame. It’ll backfire because I do believe there are enough Americans out there with enough sense to see through all the BS.

Posted by: Martin | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Because of that nose?

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Never mind, Sluggo, you made my point for me.

Posted by: mila | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Vinny….Palin neutralized Biden on foreign policy credentials. Wait I can’t write anymore I’m laughing too hard.Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

This Karl Rove guy is a genius. He has turned the election into “THE NEW AMERICAN IDOL”. He has replaced a tiresome, dried-out old candidate who is too confused to get the facts straight, and created tremendous buzz about a know-nothing right-wing Christian fundamentalist who won a beauty contest. Instead of looking at the horrible record of the last 8 nightmarish Bush years we now want to find out who is the sexiest, who has the best one liner put-downs? Hey Kids, while the the economy is going down the tubes, people are losing their homes and jobs, and respect for this country is at an all time low, lets have a Popularity Contest!! Its just like High School, wow, kids this is fun. The heck with boring political stuff, lets go for the cute gal with the smart mouth (her words also provided by Rove). Wake up kids, four years of McCain/Palin will leave you and your families far worse off than you are now. Can you afford to play these childish but potentially lethal games??

Posted by: jefflz | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

The comments on this site really makes me wonder why human beings are considered the most intelligent life on the planet. It seems almost impossible for many of you to make a point without attacking or putting down another point of view. I realize it is so much easier to deflect rather than to take stock of yourself but good gracious it is past time for some of you to get a grip!

Posted by: liz | September 9, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

why is mccain defending child molesters? Would he rather that our children get molested or learn about inappropriate behavior? John S. McCain is disgusting, dirty old man.
Why is he for child molesters? Is that going to help him win a state or something? He would rather win a state than prevent children from getting molested.

Posted by: willow | September 9, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Face it, Republicans. Your candidate HAS NO HONOR.
There is no honor in lying, and John McCain is a liar.

Posted by: The Zug | September 9, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

We all know John Stewart is a great intellectual.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

linda n carolina,
“Palin is the new Chatty Cathy Doll…pull her string and she repeats the same thing over and over again. Expected to be the latest craze for xmas. McCain working on a new CD to include drill,surge,POW along with the old standby pitbull with lipstick and bridge to nowhere. Glasses and ornate flag pin included plus instructions on how to decode your daughters from wanting to lie all the time. ”
I know, I know… I know exactly what you mean! The only thing you forgot was the “bomb-bomb-bomb Iran” tune when button two is pushed.
We probably shouldn’t be laughing at this mess, but I cannot help it at this point. Besides, comic relief helps the stress over watching the swiftboats at work all over again.
Eight is enough!!
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | September 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Palin comes on like some tough lady who can handle the big boys, so why is the entire campaign trying so hard to get the sympathy vote for her, as though she isn’t capable of standing on her own two feet?
She is going to make it harder for women to be taken seriously. She wants people to believe she is some kind of action figure, what she is in reality is a another snake oil salesperson. Very similar to George W. Bush.

Posted by: Truth Matters | September 9, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

There is a clear difference. McCain said Hillary’s PLAN was still a pig.
Obama said Palin couldn’t proclaim herself change, she was still a pig.
Well, I don’t think Obama is that crass. But still, McCain was clear, Obama wasn’t.
:D
McCain-Palin 2008

Posted by: John | September 9, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

SomeJoe, I think it is probably because these kind of attacks don’t work on the world stage. I don’t think anyone is going to be swayed by calling Putin sexist. Putin sure as hell isn’t going to back down because Palin’s a woman.
Obama has shown that he has the calm head necessary for international diplomacy. If you look at any of our greatest diplomats, you’ll notice they all have a disposition very similar to Obama’s. There is no flying off the handle. There is certainly no personal ttacks.
More than anything else, what we need most when dealing with the international community is respect. The world respects Obama. Hell, even the Prime Minister of Britain endorsed him.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

If we are stupid enough as a country to believe the complete trash that is being sold to us as “truth” by the McCain Palin camp then we get what we deserve. I used to have respect for John McCain even if I didn’t support his positions. But this low road he is taking on sex ed for kindergarteners and the example Jake gives on this “pig” debate is beyond ridiculous. I would think at some point that as an honorable man he wouldn’t want to win an election at the cost of losing all respect we have for him.

Posted by: MMMMom | September 9, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Oh, for heaven’s sakes, get a grip, people. Obama’s sexist because he called a woman “sweetie”? Because he said, “lipstick on a pig?” (WHich might have been referring to the fact that Palin has been the reigning queen of pork? Or maybe not. Who knows?) Politics is a rough and tumble business–kinda like mud wrestling–with one really, really important exception: our lives and the lives of our children hang in the balance here. This is not about silly little trivialities, it’s about picking the smartest, toughest, most capable person to get us out of this damn mess that we’re in now.

Posted by: muldoon | September 9, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Obama to O’reily please hold on a second my relations with ayers was… (Obama Stuttering), Obama eaten alive by O’Reily

Posted by: Country First | September 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Let me put this as simply as I possibly can: John McCain is pathetic.

Posted by: Mark F | September 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I’m so sick of all the whining from the McCain campaign.
They are playing as dirty as you can get in this election. Lying and hiding their unqualified candidate from the media.
Ferraro gave an interview within 24 hours of being selected as VP. So did Dan Quayle, who also was considered unqualified. That’s what you do.
Was the media beating up on Palin within 24 hours of her being picked? The answer is NO.
Palin will give the first of a 2-part interview on Sept. 11th, the day her son leaves for Iraq. You really think Charlie Gibson can ask her any tough questions?
This is ridiculous. I am ashamed of what our politics has become. And the McCain campaign is a prime example. It’s disgusting.

Posted by: cincyr | September 9, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Let’s admit one thing and move on–given the state of the race at this point in time, Obama’s words were very poorly chosen. Clearly, with Palin having stolen Obama’s mojo for the moment, his comment makes it look like he is bitter and vindictive, event if that was not his intent. It certainly does not help in his effort to reach out to women. Anyone seriously dispute that?

Posted by: NJH | September 9, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

To johnTX:
You’re making too much sense — please go away. (Just kidding.) You would do well to talk to someone elsewhere. Also note that people like John McCain still live in a world where all women *want a guy in a uniform and all men want a rodeo “girl” with a whip.

Posted by: McShame Is Lame | September 9, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

The worst thing that can happen to you in an election is to contest against a popular lady. Palin now is becoming very popular and Obama has to be careful. In Other European countries, many people know this as an idiomatic expression and he was in no way referring to Palin but just like Americans did not understand his pay grade answer, many Americans will not understand this context. Our country is rich and strong but I must say in terms of education, we are still very, very low. As the day goes by,it is becoming more possible that Mccain could win but Obama has to counter fight this smear and after coming out from a bitter struggle with Hillary Clinton where charges of sexism and racism rented the air, It becomes inceasingly visible why it is difficult to hit Palin. Mccain can stand behind Palin like a coward while Palin takes the swing on their opponenents and yet their opponenets cannot swing back. Why? Sexism. It sure sucks.

Posted by: jayjay | September 9, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

The Republicans are irrational and what’s infuriating is that they MAKE IRRATIONALITY WORK!!

Posted by: JimBob, Encino, CA | September 9, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

The McCain folks are playing the “sexist” card too often and in extremely silly situations. “Lipstick on a pig” is such a common phrase. They are indeed pathetic and I can understand why.
At the height of his campaign bounce, the best he can do is tie Obama?? Obama will be up 4-5 before the first debate. Despite his hateful ads, constant lies and hateful running mate, he’s still in the same place.

Posted by: Yvonne | September 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Obama’s loose talk is the Reps greatest gift. Tomorrow he will clarify this – “What I really meant to say was …” I thought Obama was an empty suit. Now I think he is an empty mind.

Posted by: Rick | September 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Palin’s Pig Pen
As Mayor of Wasilla
* Tax collection soared 38%
* Government expenditures increased 33%
* Spent more than $27 million in pork barrel
* Left town in $23 million in debt
* Remodeled office twice in six years
As Governor of Alaska
* Billed citizens to stay in her own home
* Supported bridge to nowhere
* Spent $450+ million in pork barrel in two years
* Sold plane to contributor at a loss

Posted by: FailinPalin | September 9, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Sara: As noted by an earlier poster today….Bush Administration ushered out of the country anyone related to the Saudi Royal Family right after 9/11.No one needs to give them any influence in this country……they already have it. Remember when bush went over there a few months ago begging for them to raise oil production.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Why is Sarah Palin still hiding from the press? I know she’s scheduled an interview with legendary softballer Charlie Gibson sometime later this week, but that means she’s free to hide until then?
Hillary was up to speed and answered questions from Day 1. Why is it acceptable for Palin to go to school first?
You mean she’s STILL NOT READY?

Posted by: Ed from MA | September 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

O’Reily destroys the stuttering Obama on his relationship with terrorist Ayers and Rezko

Posted by: Country First | September 9, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

McCain must be offering double points this week.
The republicans desperation is showing as their venom filled talons are out and scratching at anything they can.
Pig my a**.
People wake up; there’s 8 weeks left to the election.
When is McCain going to talk about the issues?
As for you dittoheads who continue to spout the party talking point that Obama doesn’t offer specifics, stop projecting. It’s your guy who’d rather divide the country than give specifics on how he’ll help US.
Obama’s plans are very well laid out and that’s what scares McCain.
He offers nothing but a talking head and more of the same crappy politics.
People what the heck is wrong with you..our President has been the worst enemy against America for the past eight years. He is to America what the CEO was to Enron.

Posted by: Lynn | September 9, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

I remember what Paul Begala said just before the 1992 election when Clinton was locked in a close race but was opening a lead. He said it was time “to drive a stake through the heart” of the George HW Bush campaign. Very tough, brutal language but right on the money. To take down this GOP beast you must fight just as dirty and just as lowdown as the Roves and must finish them off like Patton. It’s unbecoming and it’s uncivil but it’s the only way to get rid of these bums so they can’t do any more damage to our country.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Did Palin fire the govenor’s chef? No…she made her a “Constituent Relations assistant in Gov office(HUH) then to the state museum and now cooks for the Legislative lounge.Well I quess she actually didn’t fire her…..just gave her another job on the government payroll

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

jayjay,
“The worst thing that can happen to you in an election is to contest against a popular lady”
Lady? Who? McCain? I’m so totally puzzled by that comment. Where I come from, they call women who have affairs like Palin did “lady”. See Cindy McCain for clarification.
Obama 08!

Posted by: Thrash The Trash | September 9, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

This is a sad day for John McCain.
If this is all John McCain’s ministry of truth can come up with, then indeed–”it’s over,” as Peggy Noonan very unambiguously said.
How about some actual ISSUES, GOP? Why is our economy going down the tubes? How do you “win” an occupation?
No more “Whaaa, he called me a name”– especially when that is a flagrant distortion of what Obama said.

Posted by: Katie O | September 9, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

You say “Why should anyone believe McCain didn’t mean it about Hillary Clinton, but Obama meant it about Palin?”
Because Palin just made the famous ad-lib joke less than a week ago as the most highlighted line of in her now famous convention acceptance speech. And what was the punchline? “Lipstick” He knew about the double entendre – he heard the crowd react — he’s no dummy — he should apologize profusely. All you apologists…please keep it up.

Posted by: Cleveland | September 9, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

“By calling Gov. Palin a pig, Obama is once again showing how disrespectful he is to women who oppose him.”
And by thinking Obama was even talking about Palin, Republican voters once again show that they’re morons.
Remember when getting outraged over PC slights was something the loony left did? Those days are long gone, and now all we have are conservatives getting offended at the drop of a hat.
“Oh, when he said ‘putting lipstick on a pig’ it was a sexist slam on Palin! Oh, when he said McCain’s policies were ‘old’ he was being ageist!”
When did conservatives become such a bunch of whiny little children?

Posted by: Jackson | September 9, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Mary,
Please do some research. Obama did not specify his race in his application to Harvard Law School. Therefore your affirmative action claim is as fraudulent as Gov. Palin’s candidacy.
Thanks!

Posted by: Ben | September 9, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Mary, Obama graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School and then went on to teach Constitutional Law.
Implying that he is a fool who didn’t deserve to go to Harvard is insulting.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Disgusting!
NO BAMA NO WAY NO HOW!!!
Vote McCain/Palin!

Posted by: Sherry | September 9, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Jackson, thanks for straightening that out. I know everyone was paying attention and now feels bad. Thanks again.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

linda n carolina , You are just repeating another stupid conspiracy theory that have no facts to back them up. While the connections Obama has to Wright, Ayers, Rezco etc etc are factual and cannot be refuted. Plus, Obama is the one running for President not Bush. So your tactics of trying to divert attention just won’t work. Instead, start digging into Obama’s connections to his hate whitey Pastor of twenty years Wright, his buddy Ayers who after 9/11 said “he wished he could have done more” his friend Rezco, the convicted felon, etc etc etc etc etc.
Please get educated before you make your final decision and do the right thing. Vote McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: sara | September 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

“A fool can be sent to Harvard by way of affirmative action, graduate and still remain a fool.”
And the son and grandson of admirals can get into the U.S. Naval Academy as a legacy, and still graduate 894th out of 899 cadets.
Republicans really do revel in their own stupidity.

Posted by: Jackson | September 9, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Understand what you mean but I may be an Obama supporter but I will call ‘a spade, a spade’. Palin is now very popular. look at her favorables. right now Mccain has blinded the media with that bias charge and the Obama campaign with sexist charge. The only thing that will bring Obama down is himself and the only thing that will bring Palin down is herself. When you have charisma, its like that and thats why Bill Clinton is still very popular. I am looking forward to the day she starts becoming notorious but day in, day out, its all Palin, the only difference is Obama is not sulking like Mccain.

Posted by: jayjay | September 9, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

And people say conservatives have run out of ideas?
Stay classy, GOP.
__________________________________________
Mr. Obamabot, you forgot to tell me that I am a racist.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Jackson, you obviously enjoy yours.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

You know… I actually worked for McCain for a short while in 92. It’s unfortunate that the modern GOP has reduced such a great man to such a pathetic state. Would of’s, could of’s and should of’s, but I think it’s fairly apparent that this one is over. When you start questioning the validity of common folk sayings the writing is on the wall.
Time to start working to keep them under 60 in the Senate.

Posted by: FactCheck | September 9, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Dear God, I’ve never seen so much tripe (oh noes, animal parts!) in my life. It impossible to put a gloss (oh noes, lipstick!) on how ridiculous and frightened the McCain supporters on this board appear.
Hilarious!

Posted by: CatStaff | September 9, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

” Please get educated before you Vote McCain/Palin 08″
Fixed!

Posted by: Frank | September 9, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

If you want a future to nowhere then Sarah Palin will build it herself!

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

“Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno.”
– Sen. John McCain, speaking to a Republican dinner, June 1998.
Now THAT is insulting to women– and it’s not a lame-brained distortion of someone’s words. Does anyone know if the Clinton family or Janet Reno ever got an apology? They did deserve one.

Posted by: Katie O | September 9, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

The real difference between a pitbull and Sarah Palin IS NOT lipstick; if the pitbull wiggles its tail, you can trust it.

Posted by: El Mugroso | September 9, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

What a sexist remark by Obama? How disgusting and shows what he really thinks of women.

Posted by: Joseph Bailey | September 9, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Jake,
Please quit trying to defend Obama’s BS.
Remember when Obama said he knew all about Chicago politics? Well, that i swhat we are seeing him resort to now.
Chicago-BS-politics.
Obama can’t run from his sexist actions, words, and deeds.
Obama. Is. Scared.
Obama doesn’t know when to keep his elitist yapper shut. Same goes for Joe Biden.
Neither one of those good old boys get it.
Barack Obama: Out of touch! Wrong for women! Wrong for America!
Adios, Barry.

Posted by: USVet | September 9, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Katie O, You have to go all the way back to 1998 to come up with something. You Obama supporters are really grasping at straws.

Posted by: Debra | September 9, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

“Um no, you missed the fish line didn’t you? ”
So … Obama was calling her … a fish? And that’s … sexist?
Is there some sort of Conservative Guide to Being Politically Correct you all could send the rest of us? Or is there a decoder ring that helps you all figure this out?

Posted by: Frank | September 9, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

concerned in Ohio, you made me go to fox news to watch the interview, but it turns out you may have been scared by Obama’s performance. If Obama debates mccain the way he debates O’Reilly, he will win this election because there will be no time for Mccain to tell any story. Mccain does well when he is allowed to make a story out of any line but he wont have that chance on a debate.

Posted by: jayjay | September 9, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Henry,
Academic credentials is not a debate you want to have. Sarah Palin went to five colleges in five years and graduated with a degree in sports journalism.

Posted by: Ed | September 9, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Let’s try and get some facts straight and clear up misconceptions:
1. Obama did not attend Harvard through affirmative action. He didn’t even list his race as ‘African-American’ on his application. He was also the editor of Harvard Law Review, hardly a bastion of affirmative action.
2. Contrast that with John McCain who finished in the bottom 5 of his class at Annapolis. Do you think if he would have graduated if his grandfather wasn’t an admiral?
3. When Palin said the only difference between a hockey mom and a pit-bull is lipstick, wasn’t she in fact calling all hockey mom’s pit-bulls? ‘Oh, wait, that’s different.’
4. Isn’t sensitive-guy McCain the same person who claimed in 1999 that the reason Chelsea Clinton was so ugly was because Janet Reno was the father?
5. How can Palin claim to be a change agent when she actually hired a lobbyist to beg the federal government for money?
6. How about Palin’s bridge to nowhere? She never told congress ‘no thanks’ – because the offer was rescinded. However, she had no problem keeping the money for other ‘purposes’. If you’re wondering why we have record deficits, maybe you can have Govenor Palin cut you a check. Oh, wait, those are just for Alaskan constituents, not other Americans.

Posted by: Steve | September 9, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Republicans have nothing to offer to fix our country so they resort to this sideshwos.. he says..she say, inorder to ovoid talking about the issues that matter to the American people.
Repubs have nothing to offer to fix the failing economy, healthcare, taxes to the wealthy, budget and trade deficit…
By far Mccain is the dumbest politician in ecomomics. He doesnt even understand 101 economics.

Posted by: justin | September 9, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

Man, the Republicans here are delusional.
November is going to hurt like hell for you people.

Posted by: Ryan | September 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Henry, well at least he didn’t champion one of the worst planned wars in US history and claim that it could be won easily with only 100,000 troops. Of course then he turned around and said the war was mismanaged, ignoring the fact that he himself underestimated the number of troops required by 50% and even at that number, it was hardly easy.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Obama and his camp are imploding…its very plain to see. I watched the interview with O’Reilly, and Obama was squirming all over the place!
McCain/Palin 08!
“Country First!”

Posted by: david from texas | September 9, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

“Man, the Republicans here are delusional.”
Seriously. I haven’t laughed this much in a long time.
Keep up the crazy, people. It’s HILARIOUS.

Posted by: Frank | September 9, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

This is such a typically dishonest ploy for a Republican presidential campaign. If their side has to rely on phony “controversies” like this, combined with the equally phony histrionics of their supporters, who know that it’s all a dirty game, then they’ve demonstrated that they don’t have the honor or the honesty to be president. We’ve had eight years of uninterrupted B.S. from this party, and it’s time for the games to stop.

Posted by: Bob | September 9, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

What nonsense! The Press is being played. One inane accusation after the next. Anything to distract voters from the disastrous foreign and domestic policies of the Bush Administration and McCain’s steadfast support.

Posted by: thebob.bob | September 9, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

McCain said THE EXACT SAME THING last year. I swear to god the man thinks we are a nation of imbeciles. Give it a rest, and give us a break. And while you’re at it, give us your VP candidate so we can find out who she really is.
“As far as I know, she is the only one of four presidential candidates and vice presidential candidates who wears lipstick,” Swift said.
Yeah? Well, as far as we know she is the only one of four presidential candidates and vice presidential candidates who
a) has refused to answer a single question
b) is unable to campaign alone
c) cannot be further than 2 feet from her handlers
d) picks her interviewer when she finally speaks
e) is hiding behind her family and using them as distractions to keep the focus off the issues
f) lives in a bubble, “no press allowed”
Here’s another expression they won’t like: the american people will NOT buy a pig in a poke this time. Yeah, that’s what I said. We won’t buy a pig in a poke even if it IS wearing lipstick.
People are losing their jobs. Their healthcare. Their homes. Their LIVES.
Prove you care, McCain. Prove you still have some honor. Prove you put country first, not campaign.
Debate the issues that matter to the people. Tell us what you’re going to do for the people.
If Palin can’t stand the heat, she needs to get out of the kitchen. I am a woman, and I don’t know a single woman who thinks she needs “protection” or thinks she should be treated with kid gloves.
You’re a pitbull? Prove it – meet the press – or get lost.

Posted by: BMS in NC | September 9, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Well after reading all these posts I’ve come to this conclusions, never read so many lies and half truths in my life, full of sexist,bigots,racists,clones and people who would say the sky is purple absolutely the sky is purple and they truly believe it because THEY WANT TOO! Nuff said, going to bed, bored with most of these idiots.

Posted by: SmileAlready | September 9, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

I listened to Obama’s entire context in the “Pig” monologue, a couple of times. It was very carefully framed. The phrase “lipstick on a pig” is an old one, and he prefaced the punchline very skillfully. Just prior to delivering it, he almost let his excitement get ahead of him.
How can anyone this pathetic and cowardly be President of the United States?

Posted by: Citizen_Alerted | September 9, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Americans, now you know who is racist, sexist.
Look like Dems are panic… they should be.

Posted by: JohnD | September 9, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

When did the Republicans become such PC embracing, whiney babies??
McCain
Cuntry first! 00

Posted by: JosephS | September 9, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Americans, now you know who is racist, sexist.
Look like Dems are panic… they should be.
Posted by: JohnD | Sep 9, 2008 10:55:48 PM
I agree, the lustre has faded from their “golden” boy and he realizes he will lose in November!
McCain/Palin 08!
“Country First!”

Posted by: Troy | September 9, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

This whole process is now depressing me. Sexist? Kindergarten? POW.
What about us? What about our jobs, the economy? I’m saddened by all the talking and fighting and bickering. We’re all being played like puppets. Stop arguing about lipstick and start thinking about our future. For all the talk about “crossing party lines”, the only thing each campaign has done is divide us further. We’re not going to move forward like this… so depressing, in what could be so exciting. Obama wouldn’t have made a sexist remark like that, because he has too much to lose. I’m surprised McCain put out that Kindergarten ad from his campaign. I expect it from 527′s, but not directly from a campaign. I think things are going to get worse on both ends though…

Posted by: Matt | September 9, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

The video is on you tube. It is clear Obama is outraged over the poll numbers The crowd behind him act like they are attending a funeral. Of course the “pig” represents Palin. Obama is a disgusting

Posted by: geevill | September 9, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

johnTX, You know how many people were lost during WWII? How many mis steps were made? Learn a little military history. Every war is fraught with mistakes.
The reality is if Obama had got his way the US and the world would be dealing with two terrorists Nations about have or with Nukes, Saddam’s Iraq and Iran. Not only that, both Iran and Iraq would be thumbing their nose at the “paper tiger” US.
Now when the US is on the verge of victory, Obama will not admit he was wrong and the surge was a success. No no no, Obama wants to declare defeat in Iraq, withdraw and let Al Qaeda declare victory. Al Qaeda would than be in a position to rise again in Iraq (and with access to all of Iraq’s oil reserves) have the opportunity and means to attack us again and attack us hard. All I can say, if Obama gets elected start building your bomb shelters.

Posted by: henry | September 9, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

johnTX, You know how many people were lost during WWII? How many mis steps were made? Learn a little military history. Every war is fraught with mistakes.
The reality is if Obama had got his way the US and the world would be dealing with two terrorists Nations about have or with Nukes, Saddam’s Iraq and Iran. Not only that, both Iran and Iraq would be thumbing their nose at the “paper tiger” US.
Now when the US is on the verge of victory, Obama will not admit he was wrong and the surge was a success. No no no, Obama wants to declare defeat in Iraq, withdraw and let Al Qaeda declare victory. Al Qaeda would than be in a position to rise again in Iraq (and with access to all of Iraq’s oil reserves) have the opportunity and means to attack us again and attack us hard. All I can say, if Obama gets elected start building your bomb shelters.

Posted by: henry | September 9, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

That is a common phrase and I wouldn’t think one thing of it in most circumstances. The fact though that the comment comes about 1 week after
Palin’s pitbull/lipstick comment, and we all know Obama is an intelligent man with impeccable judgement, makes me believe he knew exactly what he was saying. If I give him the benefit of the doubt that he just wasn’t thinking clearly and forgot that comment would most likely be linked to Palin’s comment at the convention , that benefit of the doubt goes out the door when he uses another example pertaining to change about an old fish. Fish, maybe? Old fish, I think not. I think he knew exactly what he was saying- the pig in lipstick who’s running with the old fish. Is that offensive? The old fish part isn’t but when making a reference to a woman being a pig, absolutely.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

truth is nobama is coming unglued when he is
mouthing his mantras of change and when he is
is done with the mantra, he hims haws, stutters,
takes a breath until he gets his bearings and
goes off on his gibberish again. It is getting funny
to watch him.

Posted by: foxynewslady | September 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

I really Like Obama though…..I really like watching him dig a whole that he cannot climb out of. Everytime he opens his mouth, he drops in the Polls.
As much as he changes his mind on issues does anyone really think he could stand up to Russia, Iran, N.Korea, even Chavez???? They would laugh at him.For those of you that support him you better hope he does not get in, you will see the Down Fall Of America……

Posted by: daysofpast | September 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

When people read the whole thing “Pig with lipstick, stinky old fish”, there is for sure certain connection there. Pig-Palin, old fish-McCain.
The fact that ABC, CBS, NYT have quickly sent out people to help Obama explain this “pig” line really tells something. They know Obama blew it this time.
Several of my friends already called me, disgusted by Obama’s behavior. One of them was a avid Obama supporter. and she said: I just feel him getting more and more annoying. I do not want to see his name any more.
Obama is undoing himself in a pretty bad way and pretty fast.

Posted by: amy | September 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Seriously, at what point does the media begin to explain to voters that John McCain has a credibility problem?
In the past 2 weeks, a credibility chasm has opened up between these candidates. When exactly does that start to get reflected in their coverage? That one candidate is telling the truth and the other is telling utter whoppers?
You were tough on Al Gore for much less. Why exactly does John McCain get a pass?

Posted by: anon | September 9, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

What about some comment on the McCain ad that falsely and disgustingly claims Obama pushed for sex education for 5-year-olds when what he was actually promoting in Illinois was telling little kids how to tell if someone was touching them inappropriately?
McCain has officially taken this campaign into the sewer.

Posted by: PL | September 9, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Oh foxnewslady. Well, I think Palin’s minister would disagree with you on the whole Christianity being about LOVE thing since they believe that Jesus was a warrior who calls on people to die in wars. No really. Gave a nice big sermon about how Jesus was actually at war and had a “war mode” and everything.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

More republican Fake Outrage&#153
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Obama could not even handle Bill O’Reilly , how does he think he can stand up to Putin???

Posted by: daysofpast | September 9, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

“That’s quite a change from late July when the race was a toss-up.”
Hey Republicans: When you’re getting excited that the Republican candidate is no longer losing a deep red state like Montana, it’s officially time to give it up.

Posted by: Frank | September 9, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

THANK GOD FINALLY SOMEONE IN THE MEDIA IS TELLING IT LIKE IT IS.
Please, I love this country and as a woman I’d love to see a woman go so far as to reach the white house. As an American first though, I know when to take a step back and look at Sarah Palin and know that she isn’t the right woman and further more than John McCain isn’t the right person for anything more than Wal-Mart greeter.

Posted by: jenny | September 9, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Why is Palin being treated with kid gloves? Can’t she take it she needs to take the next flight back to Alaska. she can dish it out but can’t take it. Like a little bully.

Posted by: betsy | September 9, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

I am convinced that people are just getting more and more stupid with the passing of time. How quickly people have forgotten the disaster of the past 8 years – and they are signing up for more of the same! All I can say is – you reap what you sow. I wonder how many McCain/Palin supporters will admit voting for this duo four years from now when the economy has totally tanked? Their programs are not sustainable! Is anyone listening?

Posted by: Jane Day | September 9, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

It is true! Obama does not know how to handle not being the sweetheart of the media! I think he’s too in touch with his feminine side. What a sissy!

Posted by: AGT-R | September 9, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Sarah Palin is absolutely stunning, and right in line with my political views She’s a populist, a reformer, a conservative from working class roots (dad was an elementary school teacher), her husband’s a Yup’ik Eskimo with years of experience in environmentally sound oil extraction, she’s pro-life, pro-2nd amendment, a hockey-playing maverick of the female persuasion who’s articulate, drop-dead gorgeous, well spoken, even-tempered, and best of all where Joe Biden’s concerned, her nickname is “Barracuda”. She kicks ass and chews gum at the same time.
PUMAs like me will love her and she could bring Republican women voters out in droves for the first time in history. And since women make up 54% of the vote, well – that’s a wrap folks.
McCain-Palin 2008

Posted by: Ryan C. | September 9, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Obama didn’t make that statement! If he did it would have been…uhmm, ohh, if, uhmm, lipstick pig, I mean pig, lipstick, uhmm, uhmm.

Posted by: MikeC | September 9, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Oh my God…are they serious? McCain says it and its ok…but Obama says it and he’s automatically refering Palin?? That’s ridiculous?!
I’ll be happy when November comes, Obama is elected and all this mess with McCain and Palin will be overwith….

Posted by: Annoyed in KY.... | September 9, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

I noticed that I have not heard Biden and Hillary attacking Palin but Obama is. Biden should be the attack dog against Palin. It appears that Obama is making the presidential race against him and Palin. Hillary refuses to attack Palin. Did Biden refuse too? And, where is Biden? This is not good for Obama.

Posted by: Quincy | September 9, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Idiots. Obama was obviously comparing Palin to the lipstick, not the pig.

Posted by: nazcalito | September 9, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Jane Day, remember that 20% of people (about half of the Republican base) still believe Bush has done a good job. These people would re-elect him in a second.
It should be no surprise that these same people would elect McCain.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

I agree Matt!

Posted by: Independent08 | September 9, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Yawn!!!! Please get a grip people! Politics is an ugly business… Wouldn’t it be refreshing to get some people in high office who were more interested in true reform regardless of who got credit. I see something genuine in McCain/Palin that I have been struggling to find in Senator Obama. Sorry, as an independant voice, I am beginning to have major doubts about the Senator from Illinois. Somebody, give me a good reason to think otherwise. So far, I am not hearing it.

Posted by: West Coaster | September 9, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

What does Palin care if Obama is fundamentally calling her pig? She already compared herself to a pit bull wtf mate?

Posted by: ConservativeGodBeliverIner | September 9, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

The comment was not an accident. The focus is on ‘lipstick’–it was something a handler came up with to coincide with Biden’s, “There’s no way you can dress up that record, even with a lot of lipstick.” Now that we’ve got that out of the way, let’s look at the fact that they don’t even have the spine to admit it. I thought Obama had more class than this.

Posted by: Sid | September 9, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

I cant believe this, I cant believe the comments. Gov. Swift is an idiot. Obama did not call Palin a pig, he was just saying Mccain and Palin are the same as Bush, and anybody who tries to spin it in any other way is and idiot as well.
Also I hope NBC fires Elizabeth Hasselback for 1 saying those things about Michelle Obama and for 2 being an idiot

Posted by: NICOLE | September 9, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

We can argue the merits of our candidates back and forth. We can make outlandish claims about the opponent. We can even get ugly with each other. What we can’t do is change the desperation that is the Obama campaign. This race is over and has been since the announcement of Palin as a running mate for McCain. Dems can kid themselves all they want but the fat lady is already tuned up and waiting for November. It is finished…

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Swift is a dummy, she obviously doesn’t know that McCain talked about a Hillary bill using the same terminology – - lipstick on a pig.
HILLARY didn’t whine that it was sexism but it seems the new McCain/Palin tactic is to cry sexism at any criticism.
this is all so stupid from the woman who called herself a pitbull and a barracuda.

Posted by: citizen voter | September 9, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

These Republicans are crazy!!!
GIVE ME A BREAK!
Jake, thank you for pointing out the obvious absurdity of this phony “outrage.”
Can we please, for the love of God, talk about issues like health care and the economy? Hello, McCain I’m talking to you!

Posted by: Ruth | September 9, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

This just may be the biggest NON-STORY of my generation. REALLY?!?! Are we REALLY not going to talk about the REAL issues that matter in this election and talk about nonsense like this?
JAKE – PLEASE!!! I”M BEGGING YOU, FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, PLEASE STICK TO THE REAL ISSUES AND NOT THIS PHONY OUTRAGE OVER NONSENSE!!!

Posted by: newsdudeATL | September 9, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

if you americans vote based on this sort of irrelevant nonsense, you truly get what you deserve.

Posted by: czech republican | September 9, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

“This race is over and has been since the announcement of Palin as a running mate for McCain.”
Yep. As former McCain campaign manager Mike Murphy and former Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan accidentally said on air last week, “it’s over.” McCain’s desperate pick of an unqualified gimmick VP was a pathetic gamble.
Enjoy the pathetic two point bounce from the Republican campaign, conservatives. It’s all downhill from here.

Posted by: Jackson | September 9, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

The United States is a country of many cultures. Both candidates need to refrain from such expressions.

Posted by: FloridaCounts | September 9, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

We can argue the merits of our candidates back and forth. We can make outlandish claims about the opponent. We can even get ugly with each other. What we can’t do is change the desperation that is the Obama campaign. This race is over and has been since the announcement of Palin as a running mate for McCain. Dems can kid themselves all they want but the fat lady is already tuned up and waiting for November. It is finished…
Posted by: Dan | Sep 9, 2008 11:10:10 PM
I TOTALLY AGREE!
MCCAIN/PALIN 08!
‘COUNTRY FIRST!’

Posted by: david from texas | September 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I was shock when I heard his comment. I immediately thought he was referred to Palin. Just my personal opinion.

Posted by: willie | September 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

UCFpoliguy, live the fantasy.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I’ve watched the video several times. Barack’s body language and the crowd’s reaction at the midpoint of the line make it obvious that he was taking a swipe at Sarah Palin. Watch his hands and face as he prepares to deliver the line. There are plenty of idioms he could have used to make the point. He had already made his point with the previous line”Thats just calling something by a different name but it’s still the same thing” He didnt have to add a cliche after that line to make his point. Most speakers would use the idiom first and then reinforce it will plain talk. He has seen his poll numbers plummetting since she gave that speech and he knows the lipstick line is the line the women voters loved the most. This is a “Dean Scream” and Dukakis Tank ride combined. It doesnt matter if this phrase has been used before. He used it 6 days after Palin’s speech and he used it intentionally. Plus lipstick comments were made by other Democrats today so obviously it was on the talking points agenda. By not choosing Hilary and now sliming Palin he has set us up for 12 to 16 years of a Republican in the White House.

Posted by: hotguyg | September 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

I see Nicole thinks quite a few people are idiots including a governor. Let me explain what is idiotic. Sticking to the ‘more of the same’ message (McSame) that your camp has been hurling since the beginning of the general election campaign even though it was never effective. What is more idiotic? Reacting to a hugely popular VP selection from your opponent by attacking that selection when you are running for President. President…PRESIDENT. Not Vice President, PRESIDENT. The Obama campaign desperately needs help from the Clintons on how to run a campaign but most likely shot itself in the foot by not selecting her as a running mate. Methinks she might not be too willing at this point to right his sinking ship. And it is sinking fast. It’s almost pitiful.

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Well, Well, Well….
As Sarah would say: it just sounds like WHINING!!!
Grow up and talk about issues that matter

Posted by: Romper Room Republicans | September 9, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

The first thing that came to my mind was that he was referring to Palin, but maybe I am probably not the best one to say since I am a McCain/Palin supporter. If Obama says he wasn’t referring to her, then I am for taking him at his word and moving on. All of the candidates are in overdrive and exhausted so I think all of us should cut them some slack on the minor stuff. I thinking spending days rehashing this silly comment is counter-productive. I think we all know that both sides don’t care for one another right now. Lets talk issues, can we please??

Posted by: dlc | September 9, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

To hear McCain/Palin cry victim over this childish bs would be laughable if they both hadn’t endorsed a criminal administration and their trumped-up Iraq War which has so far extinguished the lives of 4155 brave young Americans. And they have the nerve to launch a “Truth Squad”, these lying losers. McCain got it right in 2001, his Party just has no conscience.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 9, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Thank you Lori, that is so right. Palin came out of the gate barking at Obama and camp, as well as the media. She referenced to herself as a pitbull, so why are the McCain camp trying so hard to make everything an attack against her. If she wants to play in a male dominated field, she can cry stop saying bad things about me. This is so Karl Rove politics. Obama has been trying very hard to keep this campiagn about the issues but McCain and camp want to make it about silly things like oh we have a hockey mom on our team. Its a double standard and its just stupid. Americans need to be smarter and not fall for it a 3rd time.

Posted by: Nicole | September 9, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Are Obama supporters actually saying the McPalin ticket is crying victim?! Would this be the same O’Biden ticket that has its candidate complaining about how McCain and the Republicans will eventually use race against him? What the hell would you call that exactly. A pre-emptive victim strike?! “Soon I will be the victim of the race card at the hands of my opponent,” said the man as he placed his race card on the political poker table. Gimme a break.

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Video:
Watch John McCain use the phrase “lipstick on a pig,” just like Barack Obama did.
http://link.brightcove.com/services/link/bcpid271557392/bctid1784628752

Posted by: So What? | September 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

I noticed today that most white women and independents are going over and supporting McCain. The Republicans also have the Catholic and evangelical vote. It seems that Pennsylvania and Ohio will be going red this year. Obama might as well give it up!

Posted by: Jan | September 9, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

How desperate is Obama to resort to name calling?
Obama calling Gov. Palin a pig apparently is very funny to his dimwit supporters judging by the reaction from his audience, the same way they roared with approval when he flipped Hillary in the primary.
But, is this Presidential material?
Do we want to treat accomplished, intelligent women this way?

Posted by: Rob | September 9, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

gill,
“The truth is if the media was not so in the tank for Obama and the Democrats they would be demanding a criminal investigation of the Fannie Freddi fiasco.”
What??? Paulson = Republican = Capitalism only works if we can steal a company “for the taxpayers” while the short-sellers, CEOs and the big bankers get to profit = socialism. Old money still won’t allow new money in the game. Very prejudiced those Republicans are.
Obama 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | September 9, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Obama and the Democrats want to tell Americans he is tough and can handle the good ol boys. The media has been lite on him in my opinion, if he cant handle it then he needs to get out of the kitchen. Now he calls Sarah Palin a pig. Obama is disgusting.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Sorry jake, this Hillary supporter is not ready to give Obama a pass on this. All day the Obama people have been making “lipstick” remarks.
Obama made several sexist remarks towards Hillary during the primary:
a) You are likable enough
b) Senator Clinton attcks when she is “periodically” down.
c) Calling her Annie Oakley
d) Showing her the finger.
It is clear when you watch the video and from the crowd reaction that Obama was cleverly trying to call Governor Palin a pig.
Obama is a jerk!

Posted by: Jack | September 9, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

If McCain’s comment had been directed at pantsuits, it would have been an insult aimed at Hillary. Palin owns the lipstick symbol at this point, and the fact that Obama’s campaign had McCain’s old statement ready to go immediately means they knew exactly what they were doing. This is not good politics.

Posted by: HawkTheSlayer | September 9, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

So Jan was McCain being sexist towards Hillary when he made the same comment? Why didnt Republican women stand up in an uproar and call McCain sexist when he said nothing but chuckled when an audience member referred to Hillary as a B during the primaries?

Posted by: Nicole | September 9, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Let’s get REAL people!!!!!
Now I could see if this was the first time we ever heard this statement. Then I could say WoW that’s a low blow even as an OBAMA supporter.
But this is not the first time we heard the statement. It’s older than most of us. McCain has used it.
We all know what the statement means. It’s just like saying you can’t teach an old dog new tricks. Or you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make them drink. We’ve heard our parent’s use those sayings all the time. You know they weren’t calling people dogs and horses.
Let’s get real! Why is it okay for McCain and not for Obama. THe McCain camp is pulling for neg. stuff to say.

Posted by: cocachick | September 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I really though Obama had more class, but his just arrogant and a idiot.
I really hope McCain wins.

Posted by: Johanna | September 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

The Video tells the story, Obama is a punk.
America will decide.

Posted by: 2008 | September 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

It’s true: Seven top McCain officials were lobbyists, though the campaign stresses that none is currently registered to lobby Congress:
• One: Campaign manager Rick Davis is a major telecommunications lobbyist.
• Two: Senior foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann recently faced scrutiny over his foreign lobbying on behalf of the Republic of Georgia, which has been embroiled in a military conflict with Russia.
• Three: Senior adviser Charlie Black was a foreign lobbyist for dictators in Zaire and Angola in the 1980s, fodder for the liberal group MoveOn.org.
Don’t Miss
McCain is just part of Washington crowd, Dems say
McCain: I work for you
Election Center 2008
One of the group’s recent ads charged, “Charlie Black said he didn’t do anything wrong. John McCain should tell Black he did. Call John McCain and tell him to fire Charlie Black.” Watch the Republicans’ ad calling McCain-Palin mavericks »
• Four: Frank Donatelli, the Republican National Committee’s liaison to the McCain campaign, has had clients including Exxon Mobil.
• Five: Economic adviser Nancy Pfotenhauer has lobbied for corporate giants like Koch Industries.
“Both John McCain and Sarah Palin have challenged special interests, challenged their own party. That’s the test of courage,” Pfotenhauer has said.
• The final two lobbyists are McCain’s congressional liaison, John Green, and national finance Co-chairman Wayne Berman. They both lobbied for Fannie Mae, the troubled mortgage giant

Posted by: Nicole | September 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Obama has come undone! He already has a reputation of sexism in his battle with Hillary Clinton. To even vaguely suggest that Palin is a pig is a major gaffe. Folks, Obama is over. So over. His desperation is oozing out all over. He is a whiner and a complainer. “Why can’t I just be President? I tried to act like one earlier in the summer.” Sorry pal, the country is starting to figure you out..and just in time.
Save your whining cowardly attacks for the Senate(which is where you are headed).
Go cry on Oprah’s couch, Obama! She is about the only one that cares.

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I guess the Palin smokescreen continues. Since Obama was talking about the war in Iraq, I would venture to guess the pig is the decision to go to Iraq. It’s called reading comprehension people.

Posted by: daniel | September 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

As a women I’m offended by this! Outraged, how dare he call her a pig. It just isn’t right.

Posted by: sue | September 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Obama and the Democrats are using the fact that he is black, to attack everything that Mccain and camp say about him, but at the same time they want to tell Americans he is tough and can handle the good ol boys. The media has been lite on him in my opinion, if he cant handle it then he needs to get out of the kitchen. Now he calls Sarah Palin a pig. Obama is disgusting.
Posted by: Samantha | Sep 9, 2008 11:23:29 PM
You are right, Samantha! Obama basically called ALL women pigs…he is a jerk. I am so glad that he is losing now and will not be our President! His “followers” are losing it too…look how desparate they are now…they don’t even know what they are saying most of the time!

Posted by: Jan | September 9, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

I just watched it. There’s no way he meant Palin! He was talking about policies being the same and McCain calling it something different.
It’s a common expression. People use it all the time in Washington. Obama has used it in speeches for months, LONG before Palin was even around.
Let’s not be stupid!

Posted by: Independent08 | September 9, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

lol… the candidate for president for U.S. has stooped to name calling w/a woman who’s running for #2.
Lol… this election will start to look like Obama arguing w/his wife.
Using Baracks words to a reporter “I don’t have time for this now sweetie”… now seem appropriate for his fight w/Palin now. Okay… regardless of political affiliation… you HAVE to find this pettiness High School like. Takes me back to my teenage dating years.

Posted by: KChicago | September 9, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Hereby mark one of the most stupid political campaign remarks of the last 50 years. Breathtaking, incredible, predictable.
Obama just assured and confirmed a GOP win in 2008.

Posted by: Robert P | September 9, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Have we are lost our way? Do issues not matter? Let’s get our heads out and demand solutions. Who cares what one candidate calls the other (by the way Obama did not call Palin a pig and anyone that concludes the statement he made said that is an idiot) Perhaps people believe that because they deep down think she behaves like a pig.
This petty bickering was exactly what got us eight years of Bush, a war, and economic depression. It smacks of Rove slander.

Posted by: plh | September 9, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Independent ’08 … yes, I see the context of it… but if you TRULY don’t see that as a jab at Palin, then, I can’t help you. Look really really really deep down w/in you.
Body languages and smirks are a part of “just words”

Posted by: KChicago | September 9, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Dan, its not Hasselback being a conservative that bothers me, its her mindless chatter, her rudeness to the others on the show, and comments that she made about Michelle Obama during a luncheon for Cindy McCain. The comment was rude and offensive and she is showing herself to be in line with the Bush/Cheney/Rove politics.

Posted by: Nicole | September 9, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Obama has definitely got the backing of the misogynistic wing of the Democratic Party. What a way to try to win. He maybe toast after this, and will have to spend the next 55 days with just explainin’ and explainin’ on his hands. I am sure that this will appeal to the Moveon Mafia crowd, though.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 9, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Also I find it very rude and sexist that you would refer to the women of the View as liberal hens. Now if someone were to say that about Sarah Palin you republicans would be totally offended and demanding an apology. again the double standard.

Posted by: Nicole | September 9, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

I have a question. McCain seems so proud that (before he started voting with Bush 90-95% of the time) he openly disagreed with and went against his party regularly.
If McCain thought the Republicans were wrong so often, why didn’t he switch parties or become an independent?

Posted by: Independent08 | September 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

The State of Alaska is a GOLD MINE for the big spenders in Washington. The state sends three times the dollars to Washington from sale of natural resources from federal lands. This is three times the average the state gets back for projects. How many states really do that. That state certainly needs roads and bridges. One can not drive from Anchorage to Juneau or from Fairbanks to Ketchikan.

Posted by: Mary | September 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Perhaps if Obama could go longer than three syllables without referencing Palin (check Webster’s for desperation) it would be easier to believe he wasn’t attacking her.

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

You gotta love the fact that there is a GOP Truth Squad — now there’s an oxymoron.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 9, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Let’s admit one thing and move on–given the state of the race at this point in time, Obama’s words were very poorly chosen. Clearly, with Palin having stolen Obama’s mojo for the moment, his comment makes it look like he is bitter and vindictive, event if that was not his intent. It certainly does not help in his effort to reach out to women. Anyone seriously dispute that?
Posted by: NJH
—————-
No, I don’t think it can be disputed that Obama used very poorly chosen words. They do sound condescending and degrading to Palin and make him look like a loser. My wife is furious by this and has called eight of her friends to let them hear about it. He certainly was off script and when he is he generally flounders. The aura is gone, the soaring rhetoric is revealed when he is speaking off the cuff. That is why he didn’t engage in Town Hall Meetings with McCain. He needs his prepared speeches to really impress and that is why he prefers large, impersonal settings. He does see himself as “the One” we all have been waiting for…..WRONG.

Posted by: Smitty | September 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

I doubt I will be voting Republican but now Obama knows how it feels when the shoe is on his foot and things are taken out of context. The Obama camp was eager to take things the Clintons said out of context and accuse them of being racists. I’m a man and I could pick up on Obama’s disdain of Hillary Clinton during the debates, “I like her alright,” said with his head down and almost a muttering tone. Interesting how the media didn’t play that up while if Hillary said anything that could be contrued in another manner she had to be profusely apologetic. Hypocrisy has no race or sex.

Posted by: Richard Natoli-Rombach | September 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Any woman who votes for Barack Obama is insane.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Jake, you really need to help us out here. If you’re going to publish a post like this, you really gotta give us a playbook, or a barnyard “family tree” so we can keep up with who is (or is not)calling(or not calling)someone a fish(and/or)a pig(and/or)a lipstick. I’m completely lost.
Let me see if I can figure it out:
Hillary called Romney a fish in lipstick.
McCain called Hillary a pig in a poke.
Romney called McCain’s health care plan a stinky old fish.
Elizabeth Edwards called Barack a fish-loving pig.
Barack called out McCain on his dishonorable, dishonest campaign.
Barack got called on the carpet for using exactly the same expression McCain used when talking about Hillary’s healthcare plan.
I called on John McCain to find within himself the man who truly puts country first.
I called on all my strength, and prayed to God that my country will survive the next two months, elect Obama and Biden, and begin to heal itself.
I called it a night. God help us all.

Posted by: BMS in NC | September 9, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

“Also I find it very rude and sexist that you would refer to the women of the View as liberal hens. Now if someone were to say that about Sarah Palin you republicans would be totally offended and demanding an apology. again the double standard.”…….The reference to them as liberal would be factual and in no way sexist. Calling them hens? Sexist? Perhaps but also factual. And no I wouldn’t be offended and demanding an apology as I haven’t in this case either.

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

No matter how Obama may have meant it, this just doesn’t look good.

Posted by: JJHLH1 | September 9, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Hold yourself accountable to the voters. McCain MUST release his FULL Military Records and his Mental Health Record. Do not let the voters elect this man and find out later that critical information was withheld from them. His must be fully vetted. VET HIM NOW
Is John McCain Mentally Qualified to be President if he is suffering from PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder)? He was a POW for nearly six years and his temperament is really bad. Does he get flashbacks? I am SCARED to have him making war decisions for our country. He may have a debt to payback. I thought you must be MENTALLY FIT to run our country. Why he have not released his Mental Health Records or his FULL Military Records? He MUST BE HIDING SOMETHING?

Posted by: McCainWho | September 9, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

I know Obama was not referring to Palin as a women, he was referring to McCain and Palins policies, but you cant convince the simple minded. Any how the lady referred to herself as an attack dog, how can se be offended?

Posted by: Nicole | September 9, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Okay, so now we can’t even use expressions? Well, we can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear (McCain/Palin), they’re all hat, no cattle (McCain/Palin), uglier than a mud fence, dumber than dirt, and finally, to McCain/Palin, DON’T LET THE DOOR HIT YA WHERE THE GOOD LORD SPLIT YA!

Posted by: Jill | September 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

This was not good, calling a women a pig. I was offended by it myself as I’m sure a lot of other women will.

Posted by: jill | September 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

WestCoastMessenger,
Wasn’t it Bush who cut funding for women seeking to file discrimination complaints via EEOC? Will the real mysoginist discriminators please stand up. (Bush/McCain/Puppet Palin take a bow to the applause of their lemmings).
Here’s one for the gipper..

Posted by: Dumb and Dumber | September 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

If Obama handles his adversaries in a Presidential election by calling them “pigs” how would he handle a foreign enemy like Iran or Putin? Would he call them “pigs” too? Just don’t trust giving Obama the keys to the White House. Obama is too immature to handle any serious responsibilities.

Posted by: Bill | September 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

McCain said the very same thing when talking about Hillary’s policies.
Why doesn’t everyone decide that they’re either both jerks or neither meant something by it. It doesn’t make sense to get mad at one and not the other.

Posted by: Independent08 | September 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

ABC just admit. The Republicans own you if they can get you to publish this story as news.

Posted by: daniel | September 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Obama’s counterpunch is simple:
“Oh, I never meant to imply that Gov. Palin was a pig. She’s the lipstick. It’s John McCain that’s the same ol’ pig.”

Posted by: Barth | September 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Lipstick??????
OLDDDDDDDDDDD fish?
He knew what he was saying, he meant to refer to Palin as a pig of course, he just didn’t realize how outrageous his beliefs are.

Posted by: John | September 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Obama stated:
“The other side, suddenly, they’re saying ‘we’re for change too,’ ” Obama told the crowd. “You can put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig. You can wrap up an old fish in a piece of paper and call it change. It’s still going to stink after eight years. We’ve had enough.”
This is a direct reference to Gov. Palin and John McCain. Obama is stooping to new lows and it’s going to hurt him even more in the end. You can see that he is desparate now and is not being careful with his rhetoric. He lost the election today with that comment. I see more and more women of all races take offense with this remark.

Posted by: Toni | September 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

McCain has a new ad out complaining that Obama supported legislation to teach children how to avoid sexual predators.
Why do the Republicans want to make it easier for sexual deviants to prey on our children?
Then Palin wants to force girls to carry a rapists baby to term.
The Republicans are truly the party of the sick and depraved.

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Obama called Gov. Palin a pig, called McCain an ‘old fish’, mocked Gov. Palin the other day as a ‘moose hunter’…
Those 20 years in Rev. Wright hate ministry are coming back to Obama really fast!

Posted by: Rob | September 9, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Why when someone says pig, do the Republicans immediately associate that with Palin?

Posted by: Flash Override | September 9, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

All hail the moral superiority of the Republican party!
Good job feigning moral outrage guys!

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

The experience angle doesn t work for either side. Ronald Reagen went from governor to the White House. Obama’s right it is about the issues. And he is on the wrong side of them.
His judgement. How does someone vote present without making a decision 130 times? Accountabilty maybe? Thats not leadership. Why did Ted Kennedy and other leading dems endorse him over Hillary Clinton?

Posted by: TC | September 9, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Besides the pig insult by Obama, today Joe Biden introduced a State Senator in a rally and told him to stand up to applause.
The Senator was in a wheelchair. It’s on you tube
Obama/Biden is turning into a comedy team.

Posted by: robtr | September 9, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Manufactured Outrage&#153

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

“Why when someone says pig, do the Republicans immediately associate that with Palin?”…….This feeble attempt at a ‘Ha Ha got you!’ is getting really old. Clearly anyone inferring a reference to Palin is inferring it from the lipstick portion of the statement. Gonna have to do better than that.

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

This is horrible. What about the issues? Remember gas prices and out sourcing jobs? I do not like Palin, she is so inexperianced that she can’t even talk to the press without permission. She is so far right she is a actually a sep back for women’s rights that my Grandmother and mother fought for thier whole lives!
Oh and PUMA people go play in traffic or something, just leave the rest of America alone. She did not win. GET OVER IT!

Posted by: Nick | September 9, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Dude,
How can I take someone seriously who calls themselves “Dumb and Dumber”. I’ll try, though. Obama is sly, a virtual adolescent. He used to pull the scratch the head with a middle finger trick to dis Hillary. He knows exactly what he’s doing at this stage of the game. If he’s presidential material then he knows what he said, and knows the impact. If he’s not presidential material, then he’s basically irresponsible with his choice of words. You decide.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 9, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

His stinking fish comment was directed at women? Explain that one to me please! Was he saying that women are cold-blooded aquatic vertebrates?

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

White Women Moving to McCain/Palin
Much of the shift toward McCain stems from gains among white women, voters his team hoped to sway with the pick of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as his vice presidential candidate. White women shifted from an eight-point pre-convention edge for Obama to a 12-point McCain advantage now.
In that respect, Palin seems to have done her job.

Posted by: Toni | September 9, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

I am about DONE with the GOP. They are the biggest whiners and cry babies around.
This is the DUMBEST piece of crap I have read in a long time.
I am sooooo TIRED of the McCain camp using the gender card. Women who want to be treated equal to men should say
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Stop using the gender card.
This election is too DAMN important.

Posted by: Angela | September 9, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Never forget the depths the Republicans will sink to. They call their own candidate a pig. Despicable.

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Obma should be releaseing the following:
Obams’s Occidental College records
Obama’s Columbia College records
Obama’s Columbia Thesis paper
Obama’s Harvard College records
Obama’s Selective Service Registration
Obama’s Medical records
Obama’s Illinois State Senate records
A certified copy of Obama’s Original Birth Certificate
Obama’s embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth
Any Obama Harvard Law Review articles that were published
Obama’s University of Chicago scholarly articles or publications.
Mr. Obama is being considered for the highest job in America, and he should provide the above as if he would be interviewing for that position in Corporate American.
So far all the MSM have ‘protected’ the real Obama from the public, but are real quick to jump on the lady from Alaska. Obama come clean.

Posted by: henry | September 9, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Wow… I can’t believe anyone would still come on this and try to lay into Obama AFTER what Jake Tapper of all people explained. I mean, this isn’t some random left-winger talking. I’ve supported McCain this whole election and I’ve remember his “pig” analogies and I understood them. To try and go after Obama like this just makes us conservatives look like hypocrites.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

Obama’s entire context in the “Pig” monologue deserves a couple of listenings. It was very carefully framed. The phrase “lipstick on a pig” is a real old one, and he prefaced the punchline very skillfully. Just prior to delivering it, he almost let his excitement get ahead of him. And with a little stumbling, he got through it. The freshness of Palin’s soccer-mom comment and the old “pig” phrase was too much of a temptation for him to resist.
What a sissy boy he is. How can anyone see this pathetic and cowardly person being a President of the United States?

Posted by: Citizen_Alerted | September 9, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

JAAACSOON, how dramatic. Obama will grow up and be a senior community organizer.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

You can’t even read. The post clearly references McCain using the expression first. But who cares anyway? It’s just an expression for pete’s sake.
ABC, why, why, WHY do you think it’s a good idea to allow these comment areas? It’s depressing to be confronted with so many room-temperature IQ’d Americans. Have a chat room or bulletin board system where people must log in and comment. That way, the rest of us can read the posted articles without being confronted with this foolishness.

Posted by: Jill | September 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Hay look Elvis!!!
Don’t get distracted people. This is just more fake outrage to waste time and run out the clock. Republicans do not want to talk about things that matter.
The fact is, you should be able to walk up to Sarah and call her a whore to her face, god knows the Saudis, Putin, and Iran will. If she can’t take it from Obama, she is not ready to lead.
She came out swinging last week, so let’s stop the fake tears this week.

Posted by: CrocodileTears | September 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

“You can put lipstick on a pig,” he said as the crowd cheered. “It’s still a pig.” “You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still gonna stink.”
Does anyone actually believe this wasn’t planned in advanced? The whole point is to generate faux outrage and get the media to carry his water. Obama’s passive aggressiveness is sick.

Posted by: loopy | September 9, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Okay I hope we don’t spend valuable time talking about pigs and lipsticks. Geez this election is going well below the gutter.

Posted by: a. mcewen | September 9, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

sarah palin is a sideshow so that people don’t pull the curtain back and see that the great wizard of the “new” gop is a fraud. mccain/palin will implode before it’s over but her introduction into the mix had forced barack to remember the lessons he learned on the playground… he didn’t like to lose then and i’m damn sure he’s gonna dig deep, toughen up, get in their faces and force some turnovers. bottom line is that barack is a tough, smart kid from the south side of chicago… don’t even think about counting him out. in a funny way, the next 50 something days will tell us who will be the best commander-in-chief… it’ll be about leadership, composure, intellect, luck and exploiting all possible elements of the engagement. should be fun to watch but count on the kid from the southside.

Posted by: tahoephantom | September 9, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

gill – the fact that you are unable to see the disastrous effects of the policies of the last 8 years, tells me that you like to live with your head in the sand – maybe that means you are an eternal optimist. I guess you haven’t lost any loved ones in Iraq, haven’t had to foreclose on your mortgage, lost your job, have had to live overseas where we are ridiculed by others, or lost any on your retirement funds; however, this is the reality for millions of Americans who are tired of waiting for Trickle Down economics to benefit them and who don’t dare ask what their sons and daughters died for, because the answers are too horrible to think about. I guess you are OK with our Constitutional rights being curtailed in the name of the War on Terror? That’s working, just like the War on Drugs, right?

Posted by: Jane Day | September 9, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Jackson: In your dreams and Obama’s dreams because he is a loser. The only ruler he will have is a measuring tape.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 9, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

There’s another thing about women… we don’t forget. Men and women both know this.

Posted by: KChicago | September 9, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Anyone wasting any time on this needs to get a hobby. The republicans continue to cry crocodile tears about the most ridiculous things. I would love to hear McCain/Palin talk about issues that effect us, the American public, instead of worry whose the pig, whose the fish, etc. McCain and Palin are going to great lengths to try to fracture this country more than it already is, and its embarrassing.
The facts are as plain as day. this country’s economy is in the trash, people are jobless, gas prices are out of control, we’re fighting in iraq when its been 7 years on Thursday that Osama Bin Laden took down the twin towers killing Americas in New York. Distracting us from the issues is all that the republicans have left. Facts are fact, McCain represents another 4 years of the worst administration in the modern era.
As an independent voter, I have no other recourse but to vote for the leadership that gives us the best opportunity to succeed. Plain and simple Washington needs change, and my vote will go to Obama/Biden. Bluntly, if we do not elect Barack Obama as the next president of the United States, we deserve what will happen next to us. Four more years of a terrible economy, people losing houses, jobs, and our troops still in Iraq.

Posted by: Bo in Ohio | September 9, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Forgive me, but isn’t that sorta like the pot calling the kettle black? [hey, the audience standing behind me just roared with laughter, like the folks behind Obama today, so I guess they knew exactly what I REALLY meant!] — winkie, wink

Posted by: Snow Whitehouse | September 9, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Loopy
yea thats right.. they are runnin scared and still think that orchestrated schtick like that will work when the race has been transformed

Posted by: staniam | September 9, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

This is stupid. I have nothing else to say on the matter.

Posted by: Amy | September 9, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Crocodile tears, I don’t see Palin crying “sweetie”

Posted by: KChicago | September 9, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Look, look over there.
That’s it, that’s the sum of the GOP’s campaign. God help us.

Posted by: steve | September 9, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

hahahahahhahahaahahahaha! How about this one: YOU CAN CALL A LIAR A HYPOCRIT, AND THEY WILL ACCUSE YOU OF SEXISM??

Posted by: Gia | September 9, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Name, yes they are THAT stupid. The Republican Party has absolutely no respect for its own followers. They treat them like rubes that will believe anything.
There are two types of Republicans – millionaires and suckers.

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

The “pig” and “fish” comments are old sayings to get across an idea but not the idea that Palin is a pig and McCain is a stinky fish! This is all so ridiculous, and McCain used the same phrase when talking about Hillary Clinton but whose offended about that? And worse what about the reports of McCain using the C word in reference to his own WIFE or the time he accused her of being a “lady of the evening” ( not the words he used) when he thought she was wearing too much makeup? No one is talking about this! Is this someone we want as President? His disdain for women is obvious if he can treat both his wives so cruelly.

Posted by: AmyTN | September 9, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

If McCain and little miss Alaska can’t handle that remark, they really won’t be able to handle the job of leading the nation. They clearly are easily offended… and I don’t want people like that handling diplomacy with other nations. I mean, if they can’t figure out common American phrases… what happens when they have to deal with people who don’t speak our language? McCain and Palin are pathetic and none of their endless lies will change that very simple fact.

Posted by: Jonathan | September 9, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Wow. ABC out did itself. Can we now end this silly glam-fest and get back to discussing the real issues. I know Obama is ready to discuss issues that matter. It appears that the media and the McCain/Rove prefer to keep the issues on a tabloid news level. I cannot wait to see what is behind curtain number three. Give me a break.

Posted by: Paul | September 9, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Hey Henry, make a list of the articles, degrees, etc. that Palin should release.
Short list isn’t it?
Maybe she should just do a couple of interviews, you think?

Posted by: steve | September 9, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

Sluggo: The only organizer Obama was is when was an attorney for Rezko and organized his deals. I live in Chicago, lived her all my life and Obama never said what neighborhood he did his organizing in. He lives in Hyde Park and I seen that neighborhood then before it was cleaned up. What a pigs pen.I don’t think he went to the Englewood neighborhood although in the 80′s that neighborhood was not as bad as it is now. And I believe he didn’t do that for a long length of time. There was a bank in that area but it closed its doors and I don’t have to tell you why. Just guess.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 9, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

The fact that this is even a “story” — which is what the McCain camp wanted in the first place — just shows you how pathetic the media are in this country. The McCain camp has been lying in the most ridiculous, bald-faced fashion and the media REFUSES to call them on it. When Mark “Drudge Rules Our World” Halperin and Chris Wallace are claiming that Palin is just lying — over and over — and not getting called on it, you know something is wrong.

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Wisdom alone should have informed him that this phrase, used at this point was ill-advised.
For the last 19 months we have been told that the Senator is the Anti-Bush…and for 19 months it has been gaffe after gaffe, followed by claims that the other guy doesn’t get it, or his words are being taken out of context.
Face it, Barack Obama is a better dressed version of GWB (from a gaffe standpoint) when shooting from the hip.

Posted by: Rocky | September 9, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Lipstick, pit bulls, pigs. Who cares?!
Iraq. Abu Ghraib. Katrina. Scooter Libby. Torture. Trade Deficit. Job losses. Health care. Education reform. Valerie Plame. Darfur.
Put lipstick on that, McCain.

Posted by: Rachel | September 9, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

McCain’s campaign has been eager to wine about any comment made by the Obama campaign as sexist and as a woman I find it to be a disgusting case of pandering.
Palin hasn’t really said much of value yet, but someone who doesn’t understand how the America economy works probably shouldn’t be saying anything. (See Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac comments).
I was excited about this ticket, but the more I learn about that they are offering the less likely I am to support them.

Posted by: Beth | September 9, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Excellent report on this nonsense.

Posted by: cicada99 | September 9, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Welcome to the polarized United States

Posted by: TC | September 9, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Hillary supporters need to consider the importance of this election regarding her political future.
If McCain/Palin win, the chances are quite good that Hillary Clinton will be the Democrat nominee in 2012.
If Obama/Biden win, the incumbents will be the 2012 nominees.
No President Hillary Clinton…ever…
With thanks going to Obama/Biden…
Anybody But Obama…

Posted by: Jayhawk | September 9, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

McCain’s campaign has been eager to wine about any comment made by the Obama campaign as sexist and as a woman I find it to be a disgusting case of pandering.
Palin hasn’t really said much of value yet, but someone who doesn’t understand how the America economy works probably shouldn’t be saying anything. (See Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac comments).
I was excited about this ticket, but the more I learn about that they are offering the less likely I am to support them.

Posted by: Beth | September 9, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

You McCain/Palin people on here trying to twist this must be pentecostal, its like you’re speaking in tongues.

Posted by: reever | September 9, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

What the US doesn’t need is a religious zealot in office. It is the Islamic zealots that are causing the problems in the middle east, and Christian zealots are just as bad. Anybody that wants to tell me how to think, because they “feel” that they are right, isn’t the one.

Posted by: AnyMouse | September 9, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Why are you talking about McCain’s lies on your blog instead of on your network newscast?

Posted by: Biff | September 9, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

The thing that really burns me up is black people acting like they have been treated unfairly in this country. Black pastors, of all people, should know how inappropriate it is to criticize the U.S. government in church, of all places. You don’t trust our government or something? Any black man who would listen to this outrageous rhetoric is not ready to lead.

Posted by: tim | September 10, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

These Republicans are very desperate. Putting Lipstick on a pig is a very, very, old expression. If they claim that Obama used it on Palin, then did McCain use it on Hillary. He called her proposal putting Lipstick on a pig.

Posted by: feminist50 | September 10, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Take it easy people, this is politics, sometimes it gets ugly..vote for your interst.I really think this is will be the end of United states of being the leader of the world if they elect Mccain.

Posted by: lee | September 10, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

As I read the comments posted here I became very concerned and a bit frightened as I realized that the people making all the ugly statements about the men and women running for the highest offices in our country are the very same people who will elect our next President and Vice President.
God help us and our country.

Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

That’s sexist sluggo ;-)

Posted by: Beth | September 10, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

The lipstick comment on its own would be arguably innocuous but when you add the next line about the old fish the intent becomes obvious. To say differently is to be purposefully obtuse. Be serious.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

I think our country is really backwards when it comes to Education. Its really sad. Obama also should remember that he is the underdog and not the other way round.

Posted by: eyes like summer sun | September 10, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Palin is just a package from Karl Rove and the Lobbyists. She cannot to the Press by herself. Is she ready or not.
A pity that they have to drag her and her family through this.

Posted by: JohnS | September 10, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

William, its too late for that caution.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 10, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

johns
see thats our point BNO only made that statement so you paid bloggers can insert the relevant stories on your blogs… they think they are too cute by half but its gotten old… Obama isnt soley entitled to the presidency!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Would you please stop using Obama’s middle name. It’s getting to be rude and disgusting.

Posted by: donis georgiou | September 10, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

i have no degree and i knew that term. Are people that stupid? do we need another Bush in the white house like if things aren’t bad enough.i personally do not need someone to tell me that if MCcains get in he will continue the same policies, because, spin all you want, it is the SAME party!!

Posted by: Ann murphy | September 10, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Any woman who votes for Obama is insane? Well, that would be about over half of the women in this country, many of whom are under 55, educated, and seriously engaged with women’s rights.
Nobody does moral outrage like the Republicans; and with the introduction of the self-described pit bull with lipstick, and her infantile “speech,” more like cheap entertainment aimed at rousing the brain-dead Republicans, the level of discourse in the campaign has completely, utterly degenerated.
I’m with the poster above who said that American politics has really gone done the toilet.

Posted by: Betty in Florida | September 10, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Obama is too classy a guy to call either of these, admittedly sub-standard candidates, a pig. He knows well, as does most of the population, that the true pig is the Republican party and that was certainly his meaning.
However, if it’s true that “you are what you eat”, then perhaps one should consider the huge amount of Federal pork Mrs. Palin has been consuming up in Alaska!
While not a pig, this woman is something far worse: an extremist religious fanatic who has zero tolerance for differing ideas and zero experience with the rest of the world – 95% of the world’s population.
Palin has spent her entire life both geographically and philosophically isolated. She’s not ready to be a Governor, must less a VP or, god-forbid President.
Conclusion: Anyone who would allow his “controllers” to select this woman as a “pander-play” running mate has been thoroughly conditioned as a puppet for the powers that be. He is therefor certainly not fit to lead this country, much less change anything in Washington.
I predict that after the GOP loses this election, the name “Palin” will gradually return to being recognized firstly as one of those funny guys in the Monty Python troup.

Posted by: informedThinkingVoter | September 10, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

I can’t wait until Ms. Palin speaks without reading a script. What is she afraid of anyway? The same people on here trying to twist Mr. Obama’s words will be working overtime trying to explain her gaffs. Should be good for a lot of laughs.

Posted by: one more | September 10, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Jake,
Our country has serious problems and this is all you can cover? What about education, health care, the economy, energy policy, the war in Iraq, the war in Afghanastan, a resurgent cold war. All of these topics and how the candidates will deal with them is what you should be covering.
You are letting the citizens of this country down by not forcing a real debate and helping to inform the electorate.
Yes that is hard, but that is your job. So get off your lazy rear end and do some real reporting. Stop just repeating what both candidates say and run it through a fact filter and an importance filter and help rais the level of the debate rather than resort to lazy least common denominator journalism.

Posted by: Todd G | September 10, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Seriously Johnathan, regarding your comment: “If McCain and little miss Alaska can’t handle that remark, they really won’t be able to handle the job of leading the nation. They clearly are easily offended… and I don’t want people like that handling diplomacy with other nations. ” WHERE have YOU been the past 18 or so months when OBama gets upset every time an issue comes up that is against him? Hillary couldn’t talk about ANYTHING! Hence the poor loss.
Now, had it been Hillary as the nominee… There wouldn’t be an issue over whether the nominee is ready. There wouldn’t be any name calling from the democrat’s camp, there wouldn’t be a comparison of the #1 on the ticket vs the #2 on the ticket.
Think about it… he wasn’t fair to Hillary, as a matter of fact, he was an ABSOLUTE JERK! Now that he’s not ahead as he thought he’d be… he’s acting like a child.

Posted by: KChicago | September 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

“Take it easy people, this is politics, sometimes it gets ugly..vote for your interst.I really think this is will be the end of United states of being the leader of the world if they elect Mccain.”…….So lets say McCain cleverly drops in a racist term about Obama. Are you going to be the first on hand to say sometimes politics gets ugly? Somehow I doubt it.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

No one does phony outrage better than the republicans.

Posted by: a reader | September 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

The McCain campaign is just pathetic. No wonder they want this election to be about personalities and not the issues. I’m truly disgusted by John McCain and his full embrace of Bush/Cheney policies and Karl Rove tactics.

Posted by: Salvatore | September 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Ann,
The term is an old one…but it was a very bad choice to use it right now. Context matters, and with it being used now, and especially considering the audience reaction, you cannot claim that he did not realize immediately that these words, despite their heritage, should have been clarified. If he did not mean it as an insult, he should have made that clear right away.
The audience reaction is key here.

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Patwal,
Had Hillary just made a joke that featured the word lipstick?
Context, context, context.

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Come on people! This whole Palin thing is a trap, designed to create a crippling double standard. You let lose an attack dog protected by her gender? Ridiculous.
Obama/Biden are now expected to enter the fray with their hands tied behind their backs? Nice. Very Rovian. White women, please migrate in droves. We are headed for a world in which your uterus will have a monitoring device and your doctor’s staff will be payed informants just in case you had–an illegal abortion. That is just the beginning.

Posted by: bob | September 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Mr. Obama,
Please talk to your followers, they re going to cost you the election.

Posted by: TC | September 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

ToddG
its Obama that repeated the unfortunate phrase Lipstick on a pig… only meant for the aloof set in San fran etc

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Salvatore, and it was okay for the democrat elites to choose “personality” instead of “experience” right?
Don’t be silly…

Posted by: KChicago | September 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I just want to echo what someone earlier wrote: Some mightily stupid people post here. Although evidence of that stupidity comes in all shapes and sizes, one that really stands out is the Senator-Obama-supporters-think-their-candidate-is-the-Messiah meme. Although I cannot speak for every Sen. Obama supporter — roughly half the country, mind you — I’ll bet most of them plant to vote for him because (1) he has a good grasp of the issues; (2) he has solid policy prescriptions for what ails our nation; (3) he is well-spoken, which most leaders ought to be; and (4) he has demonstrated a commitment to public service as both an Illinois State Senator and United States Senator (i.e., he’s not asking for the job after wrapping up a stint as manager of a Chucky Cheese).

Posted by: R.C.Kent | September 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Republicans have really mastered the art of victim politics. They play it better than the Democrats ever did.
I’d love it if some adults could take over the McCain campaign and we could talk some issues, but unfortunately the McCain campaign knows that Americans overwhelmingly oppose everything they want to do/continue doing to this country. That’s why we see bull like this come down the pipe daily.

Posted by: Brendan | September 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

“Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno. ” quote from John McCain. He said it at a GOP fund-raiser, Washington D.C. on June of 1998.
Chelsea Clinton was a little kid then, hardly someone you’d want to attack.

Posted by: johnTX | September 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Sluggo: McCain I am voting for him also. I would never give my vote to Obama. I hope the polls are correct and McCain’s poll numbers go up higher. Obama is too arrogant and thinks he is the president already. He lacks respect and he uses people for his own benefit. I can’t understand why Hillary campaigned for him knowing what Obama and Nancy did to her regarding the delegates in MI and FL. One thing is for sure Palin is a fighter and Obama and Nancy wouldn’t do that to her.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 10, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Bob
dont try to scare people … poltics aint beanbag someone once said!

Posted by: stanaim | September 10, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

McCain/Palin = Feigned outrage by the same folks who lie about their records. They have successfully distracted the voters from what is really important, ie the economy, getting us out of Iraq, etc, etc.
Either that or these people are severely metaphorically challenged.

Posted by: Hannah | September 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

“Would you please stop using Obama’s middle name. It’s getting to be rude and disgusting.”…….Who’s asking? Richard Milhous Nixon? John Fitzgerald Kennedy? Or was it William Jefferson Clinton? Perhaps it was just ole ‘W’? Maybe Franklin Delano Roosevelt? Could it be LBJ? You know, Lyndon Baines Johnson? I’m sorry am I being rude and disgusting? I forgot how rare it is for a president’s (or a candidate’s) middle name to be used.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Don’t forget that McCain abandoned his first wife and married Cindy just 4 weeks later.
Talking and SEXIEST of all times

Posted by: JohnS | September 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

I agree with johnTX. Obama was referring to Bush/McCain policies that are bad for America.
Let’s stick to the issues: Sarah Palin has been lying repeatedly with a big smile about her actions as mayor (when she actually pursued earmarks) and governor (she actually favored the bridge to nowhere until it was clear that it would not be fully funded and then kept the federal funds) for the last several days. Where is the outrage about that?

Posted by: Susan | September 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

JohnS,
Did you just call John McCain sexy?
Log Cabin maybe?
(sorry, couldn’t resist that one.)

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I was going to vote for Obama but after he used the PIG – he lost my vote. That is offensive and not professional at all. I am a democrat and voted that way all times. This time I am voting against Obama. He needs to be a professional – perhaps in 2020…..

Posted by: Annonymous | September 10, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

After studying the comments from Obama’s supporters it is eary to conclude that:
1) Obama has idiots for supporters.
2) Obama is himself an idiot.

Posted by: Sluggo | September 10, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

bob, seriously… did you not see this w/Obama vs Hillary? Where Hillary was fighting w/her hands tied? She wasn’t given her hands at all when Obama started using the race card.
Further, Obama is the idiot that started this… oh and his followers, let me see… Wright, Ludacris (paiting the white house black, Hillary’s the B, McCain sits in the white house… you get the idea).
I’ve said it before during the Primaries… what goes around comes around. He abused women and took us for granted… and NO, this is not out of revenge for Hillary. I just don’t like his policies. But again, what goes around comes around… it’s his turn to receive what he dished out. But the funny thing is, it’s him who dished it out to Hillary, now it’s him who created this problem for himself.
So great at playing both sides of the fence as always.

Posted by: KChicago | September 10, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

–nice typo
Don’t forget that McCain abandoned his first wife and married Cindy just 4 weeks later.
Talking and SEXIST of all times

Posted by: JohnS | September 10, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Susan,
Where is the bridge?
Of course she pursued earmarks for her city, that is what a mayor is supposed to do, but when it was going to cost her city money, she squashed it…that is also what she should do.
Mayors, like presidents should work for the best interest of their citizens. No lie was told.

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

For someone who likes to think of himself as an informedThinkingvoter you really don’t seem to understand that a governor has ZERO ABILITY to do anything about pork barrel spending. You do understand that would be Congress that earmarks spending that is ultimately approved by the President or his veto must be overridden? Governors can’t ‘bring home the bacon’. Perhaps you aren’t really all that informed or maybe you just aren’t thinking.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

“OBAMA, the most sexist candidate in modern history.”
You have the credibility of McCain and Palin… Obama has not done anything sexist, but you guy’s certainly are. You think women are dumb enough that if your canidate selects a woman, they will ignore his history of womanizing and affairs on his first wife and vote for him.

Posted by: jeff | September 10, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Samantha
In the spirit of the obamabots mentor, “forgive them for the know not what they do!” The think they are doing us a favor when they have just been snakebit by an actual campaign tactic that we told them would come!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Brendan: I defy anyone to tell me where John McCain stands on education. The same for the economy. The same for international status in education. The same for a real energy policy – and drilling off the Carolina coast is one of the stupidist things I’ve ever heard, and I’m a geologist. Ain’t gonna happen. His health care plan is a disaster. His foreign policy plan is a disaster. He won’t tell us what he plans to do for women. He doesn’t support GI’s. He won’t tell us who his foreign policy advisors are (I don’t blame him – one of them is Kissinger and another is Max Boot). He can’t run on policy, so he runs on empty – and then thinks he can win by buying off the evangelicals.

Posted by: mara | September 10, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

I’m a woman.
Since Obama and even McCain have used this lipstick on a pig saying in the past it clearly is not a slam on Palin just because she happened to talk about lipstick rather than policy at the convention. She didn’t write her speech anyway so what does it matter?
Now…if Obama had said you can put lipstick on a baracuda, but it is still a baracuda, you might have a case. LOL

Posted by: GloryB | September 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Brendan: I defy anyone to tell me where John McCain stands on education. The same for the economy. The same for international status in education. The same for a real energy policy – and drilling off the Carolina coast is one of the stupidist things I’ve ever heard, and I’m a geologist. Ain’t gonna happen. His health care plan is a disaster. His foreign policy plan is a disaster. He won’t tell us what he plans to do for women. He doesn’t support GI’s. He won’t tell us who his foreign policy advisors are (I don’t blame him – one of them is Kissinger and another is Max Boot). He can’t run on policy, so he runs on empty – and then thinks he can win by buying off the evangelicals.

Posted by: mara | September 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Grow up- Obama is not a sexist and you know it. Sometimes I get the feeling that you love war, and also to be hugely in debt.
OBAMA/BIDEN ’08

Posted by: donis georgiou | September 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Anyone criticising Obama’s church need to read about Palin’s which invites Anti-Semitic speakers who champion converting Jews to Christianity, a Third wave theory as well as other far right fringe heretical elments.

Posted by: Rightwingchurches | September 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Read about the candidates’ discussions of the issues and vote your conscience concerning the position of our country in security, economy, health, education, and diplomacy(standing in the world).
Ignore all jabs meant to distract your intelligent analysis of issues as written within the policy statements of each major candidate.
All else is partisan fun, or vehemence, but of no worth for intelligent voting.
Clear communication of policy is the requirement of solid candidacy.
Careful reading and questioning of these policies are the requirements of
a democracy’s voting public.

Posted by: Rosemarie | September 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Susan said :Let’s stick to the issues: Sarah Palin has been lying repeatedly with a big smile about her actions as mayor (when she actually pursued earmarks) and governor (she actually favored the bridge to nowhere until it was clear that it would not be fully funded and then kept the federal funds) for the last several days. Where is the outrage about that?
______________________________________
OH PLEASE WE SAT AND WATCHED MSNBC DROID SEXIST REPORTERS GO OVER TO ALASKA AND RUN OVER PALIN’S LIFE WITH A FINE TOOTH COMB. WE EVEN KNOW WHAT BRAND OF TAMPONS SHE USES THANKS TO THE SAME MEDIA HOUNDS WHICH GIVE BARACK A PASS ON EVERYTHING.
ANY WOMAN WHO VOTES FOR OBAMA SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF HERSELF.

Posted by: Samantha | September 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Oh…did the poor wittle Johnny and Sarwah get der feelings hurt? Oh poor wittle babies….Correct me if I’m wrong but does gov. PHALIN own the word lipstick or something? What is the problem here people? Are you so lame that you don’t know “a saying” when you hear it? It was funny! F U N N Y!!!Yes H U M O R!!!! Remember that?
For the first time I’m voting Democrat.

Posted by: Independent | September 10, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

thank you, Jake.

Posted by: dave | September 10, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Back to the issues, even though, I feel NoBama did indeed refer to Palin in his “pig” statement.
Obama continues to say he wants to put a 25 to 28% Cap Gains tax on wealthier Americans. With America being in a recession, the best cure for getting out of the recession is investing. Most wealthier Americans have the funds to invest, however, with a high Cap Gains tax, they will be more reluctant to do so. Obama is hoping that by taxing wealthier Americans, taht this will trickle down to middle and lower class Americans so he wont have to raise thier taxes. This will not work. Once he starts to tax the wealthy Amerians so hard, they will quit investing and therefore, the country will stay in recession. This means, under the Obama economic plan, that the middle and lower class Americans will have their taxes increased after all.

Posted by: david from texas | September 10, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

What’s good for the “goose” is good for the “gander” as us old folks used to say. The “lipstick on a pig” saying is just as old. Get over it….if she didn’t want to make it a talking point she shouldn’t have brought it up. That said, I don’t think Obama meant it the way all you right wingers are taking it, he is too much a gentleman to talk about a “”"lady”"” that way.

Posted by: CP | September 10, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Sluggo – The only Marxists I’ve witnessed lately are the ones in Washington and on Wall Street – who just did the biggest corporate welfare move in the history of the country. The government now controls Fannie Mae – and Frddie Mac, and I am pretty sure that we have a Republican as President. If you’re worried about Marxists, I suggest you call the White House.

Posted by: mara | September 10, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

The hypocritical right can sure dish it out, but can’t take the heat. You can’t critize McCain or say anything negative without the McCain camp playing the POW card. Now, any critical comment about Palin is sexist. While Obama did not call her a pig, he should have because rather than being a pitbull with lipstick, Sarah Palin is in fact a PIG with lipstick. As both a mayor of a small town and the governor of Alaska, she has greedily fed at the earmark trough of the federal government gobbling up as much taxpayer money and pork she get. So all those rightwingers out to take Sarah’s advice when she criticized Hillary and stop their whining.

Posted by: David | September 10, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Independent… you are DEFINITELY not funny. “For the first time I am voting Democrat”… okay… yeah right. Your accent is cute though, now run along and look for your mommy.

Posted by: Aurora | September 10, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Oh please. She is not the Queen of
Alaska. She lost that race. Everything is not about Sarah. He was talking about issues and change and even
Huvkabee said so. Who do these people think she is? Trust me. She is no Hillary. She referred to herself as a dog in lipstick. Did she apologize to herself? She is not above the fray. But that is not the point. He didn’t call her a pig. Too bad John can’t run oor even appear without her. Is she going to apologize to community organizers?

Posted by: Amanda | September 10, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Wow. With the world watching we on the outside are just amazed out how STUPID Americans are to believe that a Republican administration now claiming itself to be CHANGE could be trusted for 8 more years. LOL Your country is slipping in EVERY SINGLE economic indicator. I feel sorry for my American friends. The only civilized country in the World and the richest that ALLOWS 50 million of it’s citizens to not have health care. Crime rates higher than ANY industrialized country on earth yet you can’t agree on gun laws for the inner cities. What’s in the water there? Obama is an articulate leader who would do WONDERS for world opinion of the US.

Posted by: Jason | September 10, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

david from texas I fear you are wasting your time trying to stick to the issues. Especially when it comes to capital gains taxes. I seriously doubt you’re going to find anyone who can engage you in that particular topic. Just because people list the economy as the number one concern in the election doesn’t mean they understand anything about it.(Although you happen to be spot on concerning it!)

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

People need to vote their pocketbooks and not personalities. You don’t have to like the President, just know he has your interest at heart has a clue about what the heck it is he is doing.

Posted by: dave | September 10, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I’m not exactly sure when Oprah was supposed to be held up to the journalistic standard of being unbiased.
Honestly, as a man, I always saw her as daytime fluff. The idea that women would shun her because she refuses to have on a guest is… well, frankly, it is amazing. Next thing you know, they’ll be shunning Martha Stewart for not sewing Sarah Palin cosies.

Posted by: johnTX | September 10, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

good lord… they accuse Obama of teaching sex to kids, then they have the gall to flip out about this? they have become completely unhinged. karl rove mastery at work… and unfortunately as seen in these posts, people are latching on to ANYTHING to derail this campaign. make it about ANYTHING other than the last 8 horrendous years of republicans in the white house.
do you realize how stupid you sound when you get offended over a remark like this? what about the LIES that mccain and palin are tossing around? what about your OWN PARTY thinking the palin choice was a mistake?
i can’t believe i wasted the time to even write this, hoping that some mindless fools would actually think rationally.

Posted by: foomonkey | September 10, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

David, I don’t think we’re whining… we do think it’s funny. At least this McCain supporter thinks so.
It’s so high school like that it’s hilarious! As I’ve stated, sounds like the Pres nominee is fighting w/his wife. It’s so silly,childish, and stupid that it’s funny.

Posted by: KChicago | September 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

david from texas I fear you are wasting your time trying to stick to the issues. Especially when it comes to capital gains taxes. I seriously doubt you’re going to find anyone who can engage you in that particular topic. Just because people list the economy as the number one concern in the election doesn’t mean they understand anything about it.(Although you happen to be spot on concerning it!)
Posted by: Dan | Sep 10, 2008 12:26:35 AM
I’m afraid you’re right, Dan! This election is scaring the hell out of me. Seems no one is concerned about what’s on the table for Americans in the future!

Posted by: david from texas | September 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

How rotten and stinky!!! McCain is running around telling atrocious lies about Senator Obama, but pretending now to be so sensitive. Making an insult when there is none. I can’t see how anyone would even consider Senator Obama saying something mean about anyone’s appearance. This is a good man who lives the life. He is not fake like McCain.

Posted by: Vicki | September 10, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Now the Republicans “own” the word “lipstick” – just like they own the words “patriotism” and “serve” and “country”. Why? Because they say so.

Posted by: Anna | September 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

dave
wrong again! Thats what they said about GW Bush! Obama has modeled his who thing all 19 months or whtever he thinks hes been on this gravy train after Bushes first run for president… what goes around cxomes around! you know as Bush would say fool me once dont get fooled again!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Senator Obama clearly called Sarah Palin a pig. He also called John McCain an old fish, a rotten one to boot. He needs to apologize and stop the name calling.
bbvmck

Posted by: bbvmck | September 10, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

I am a feminist. This was not a sexist comment, and it did not refer to Palin. McCain used this same phrase describe a Hillary Clinton policy. All of the people pretending to be offended and pretending they have not heard this phrase before are lying. If you don’t want to vote for Obama, don’t vote for him, but stop lying and pretending you think he’s sexist.

Posted by: Di | September 10, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

It’s funny to see you the ignorance of the people buying into this bull when you want to. It’s just an old saying that was used by all the candidates at some time…
For God’s sake — Think for your selves!!
Chillax!!

Posted by: brightwoman | September 10, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

I can’t believe that someone wrote an entire article about this. What’s worse? I just spent 4 minutes reading it.

Posted by: Shain Raley | September 10, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Back to the issues, even though, I feel NoBama did indeed refer to Palin in his “pig” statement.
Obama continues to say he wants to put a 25 to 28% Cap Gains tax on wealthier Americans. With America being in a recession, the best cure for getting out of the recession is investing. Most wealthier Americans have the funds to invest, however, with a high Cap Gains tax, they will be more reluctant to do so. Obama is hoping that by taxing wealthier Americans, taht this will trickle down to middle and lower class Americans so he wont have to raise thier taxes. This will not work. Once he starts to tax the wealthy Amerians so hard, they will quit investing and therefore, the country will stay in recession. This means, under the Obama economic plan, that the middle and lower class Americans will have their taxes increased after all.

Posted by: david from texas | September 10, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

He was not referring to Palin at all, it’s crystal clear if you listen to the statement on video.
This is just another diversion and lame attempt to avoid talking about issues. There is nothing for the Republicans to run on so they muddy the water w/ this kind of stuff…let’s talk about your actual plans. You don’t want to reform NAFTA (not country first), you don’t want to cut taxes for the middle class, only protect the “job creators” (not country first), you have a stay-the-course strategy for Iraq even while Bush is talking time-horizons (not country first), you have 0 interest in helping 45 Mill w/o health care (not country first), you have lobbiest running your campaign, why don’t you fire them if you’re such mavericks?

Posted by: doug | September 10, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

It really is useless to argue this here.
The fact is that it was at minimum ill-advised…but people are so wedded to their views already that logic has disappeared.
Barack Obama is a smarter candidate than this, and his campaign will either stop trying to spin things like this as more evidence of Republican thuggery, because the mistake was Obamas, or they will forfeit all credibility.
He should have never said those words, not right now.

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

“The idea that women would shun her because she refuses to have on a guest is… well, frankly, it is amazing. Next thing you know, they’ll be shunning Martha Stewart for not sewing Sarah Palin cosies.”……Isn’t that reason as good as any? Does a woman need a reason to stop watching a tv show? Did it occur to you that Oprah should have considered the marketing impact of her decision? That would be a problem of her own self-centered making. She should be offered no sympathy nor defense for a poor business decision.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

to “david from texas” and his following comment: Once he starts to tax the wealthy Amerians so hard, they will quit investing and therefore, the country will stay in recession.
if you knew anything about the current tax system you would understand that it is totally out of balance right now. The people with the most money are paying the least taxes and the people with no money are paying so much taxes that I am surprised they can manage to feed themselves each month (mind you some of them can’t. Obama proposes balancing the American tax system so that it is fair for everyone. And another thing, look back at past presidents who raised taxes on the top tier of Americans and you will find a strong economy

Posted by: sam | September 10, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

He’s watching it slip…slip…slip away before his very eyes.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 10, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

I don’t have any hope left. John McCain says country first as he starts another Culture War in America and yet know one with a Media voice calls him on it. The media stands there letting the Palin spew mendacity after mendacity concerning her claim to be against the “bridge to nowhere” when everyone who has been paying attention knows this in not so. The same goes for her constant claim that she is against EarMarks. We let this Culture War got so heated that women… who are angry because hillary lost, now think that voting for McCain is a better option, even though he voted not once but three times to reject equal pay for women who are working the same jobs as men. America, we are falling for this again. If it is not gay marriage, creationism, it will be something else… all in an effort to make us not pay attention to the issues.. We all need to step back and get back to what this election is really about. CHANGE IN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT FROM WHAT HAS NOT BEEN WORKING IN A WAY THAT IS GOOD FOR THE MAJORITY OF AMERICANS IN THE MIDDLE CLASS..

Posted by: Willie Will | September 10, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Great article Jake. Republicans are such obvious hypocrits, they don’t even bother to try and hide it.

Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

…and all reason and civility slowly drains from the debate…nice, very nice.
Enjoy November.

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Seriously, I wonder how many men and women here who have been in the Vietcong’s jail (as a POW or even as their citizen), would come out and know who their previous mates are period. After 5 years away from your significant other (w/out being in jail) you still won’t know your significant other.
Honest, I know 6 couples in the VietCongs jail (as their citizen) and 5 are married to someone else now,(and they’re good people) after years of being away. One remained together after 12 years (she raised her child alone) and they both hardly ever talk to each other. Very noble of them to stay together… but I never see them smile … great people.
So really… can you be married to someone you don’t know?

Posted by: KChicago | September 10, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

willie Will
CNN spent a full hr on it tonight with anderson cooper… your just upset that the whole thing may be slipping away from u

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Do any of you understand what happened with the federal government’s bailout of Fannie and Freddie yesterday? US taxpayers have just been saddled with trillions of dollars in mortgage debt. Did you know that the stock market fell almost 300 points today? Do you know what it means? If you don’t, and I sure hope you do, it’s because you’ve been wrapped up in this stupid distraction with McCain/Palin. Keep it up. This economy comes courtesy of the party in power and they’d love to distract you from the reality of the US recession, certainly a depression in the housing market. Would you please wake up and stop thinking about pigs and fish. You might not be able to afford pork nor fish in the months ahead.

Posted by: Donna | September 10, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

“if you knew anything about the current tax system you would understand that it is totally out of balance right now. The people with the most money are paying the least taxes and the people with no money are paying so much taxes that I am surprised they can manage to feed themselves each month (mind you some of them can’t.”……Really?! Because I was pretty sure that the top five percent of tax payers actually paid 53% of all taxes. I was also pretty sure that someone at the bottom of income earners would see the largest percentage benefit from the most basic of deductions. Nevermind all that, you have really opened my eyes with so many facts to back up your claims.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Thank you, Sam for responding. Its nice to see someone here trying to stick to the issues.
So, you are in agreement that the wealthy should be taxed up to 28%? It’s like they are being punished for being successful. Every single American is afforded the right to become whatever they want to be. I realize it is a struggle for everyone, but I don’t think that punishing the wealthy is the way to go. I stand by my argument that investments is the only ‘sure’ way of getting an economy out of recession. I agree with you, as anyone would, that the economy is out of balance right now. I just don’t see how Obama’s economic plan will work….someone is going to have to pay, and I’m afraid its going to be common folk like you and me.
Again, thanks for some intelligent discussion.

Posted by: david from texas | September 10, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

A pig is a pig, lipstick or not. The glove fits McCain and Palin.

Posted by: indea | September 10, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

All these fake Hillary supporters and/or women so outraged by Obama’s comment – I was a Hillary supporter, I will NEVER be a Palin anti-abortion, anti-science, anti-polar bear supporter. EVER. So all you fakes trying to encourage women like me to peel away from the Obama-Biden ticket…dream on, it ain’t gonna happen!
Happy to not be a Republican liar, cheat and hater

Posted by: You Make Me Laugh | September 10, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

More context from his remarks:
“That’s not change. That’s just calling some — the same thing, something different. But you know, you can — you know, you can put lipstick on a pig; it’s still a pig.”
Yeah I can definitely see how he’s referring to Gov. Palin there.
You know though… if the McCainiacs are willing to admit that Palin and McCain are “the same thing” and are just calling themselves “something different”… then I’ll grant them the victimhood of being called a pig and an old fish. Deal?

Posted by: Aaron | September 10, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

David,
It is a little difficult to find, isn’t it?
Sadly, regardless of how this election turns out, I don’t think the hate and vitriol are going anywhere.
Nice analysis, by the way.

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Senator Obama’s campaign of HOPE and CHANGE is a big farce. He had over 25 points of concern but not one real specific answer that will work. I listened to his speech three times and even took notes. Most of the speech was a repeat of previous ones. He should know he can not do all things for all people on equal basis.
I grew up in a family of 8 and we had no health insurance yet my folks always made sure we received the medical attention we needed. The only time I had troubled was when disabled on the job and the insurance company and my employer did not pay the bills or even give a damn. I had to use every last penny of savings for four year of surgeons, physical therapy and drugs.
So having insurance does not always help.
Also, I know no one who needed or wanted an abortion. Responsible women make sure to behave properly and sometimes just say no. Yes, rape and incest pgs should be aborted but they are less than 1% of the abortions.
The McCain/Palin ticket is for decency and best for a countrty of responsible citizens. Senator Obama is not the candidate for America. He is a socialist/communist to the core.

Posted by: Mary | September 10, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

All of these posts are either manufactured outrage or outrageous stupidity. Probably a mix of both, but either way, you all sound like idiotic high school kids. Obama was clearly talking about how the last eight years stink, not how Palin looks like a pig with lipstick. Unlike the Republicans, Dems don’t actually have to stoop to low tactics, because we actually have a platform that doesn’t smell like a dead fish.

Posted by: MJL | September 10, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I just watched the speech. From comments here, I expected the man to be frothing in the mouth like a rabid attack dog.
It was a perfectly normal expression in the English language taken out of context. Now, lets get back to discussing the issues and stop throwing in this silly distractions.

Posted by: Bob | September 10, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

You asked: “So, you are in agreement that the wealthy should be taxed up to 28%?”
Yeah baby, I am! Pay down that big federal deficit we have – that’s right! You show us all these wealthy people on reality shows all these years – and I haven’t seen a damn one of you that can’t afford to part with 28% of your wealth – what, you need ANOTHER house, ANOTHER zillion-dollar wardrobe, etc? You people are the biggest joke going. You’re like Marie Antoinette…boo-hoo, I wanted another big dress while the peasants starved.

Posted by: You Make Me Laugh | September 10, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I don’t know many middle class people who make money off capital, so the captial gains tax really affects the upper middle class.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I don’t have any hope left. John McCain says country first as he starts another Culture War in America and yet know one with a Media voice calls him on it.
_______________________________________
Willie are YOU KIDDING ME? Obama started a culture war by saying things like “typical white person” and comments such as:
“You got into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” — Barack Obama
The culture war started in Chicago, Illinois.
“Anybody gone into Whole Foods lately and see what they charge for arugula? I mean, they’re charging a lot of money for this stuff.” — Barack Obama
The Audacity of CHARD.
Give me a break. Says one thing in one city and something else in another.

Posted by: Samantha | September 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Wordwizard found no reference to the full phrase earlier than 1986. Using lipstick to denote cosmetic changes has been used since at least the late ’50s.

Posted by: MrX | September 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

If genuinely a person feels that somehow McCain did not call Romney or Hillary a pig but Barack called Palin a Pig, they are racist perhaps even without knowing it. There is a conditioning that happens due to the inherent inequality and stereotypes that all people have to a certain degree. Some can have their thinking/reasoning part of their brain override this, others cannot.
The conclusion of the blog -
It seems to me we should have one rule…

Posted by: scene | September 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

I wonder if Barry realizes what scumbags some of his supporters are.

Posted by: Mack | September 10, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Last comment before I leave (what I’ve said about couples in the VN jail is true and sincere).
And as a woman who is sensitive to sexist comments regardless of what race, social or political views… Obama is SEXIST. Doesn’t matter how one spins it. I hate the way he treats women that he doesn’t favor. He belittles them, that’s how he feels power. Obviously he’s nice to his daughters and wife. And for the record, I actually like his wife. And for his wife to love him, it must mean something. Though he still belittles women he doesn’t like… using sexist terms. Which makes him a coward in my eyes.
Perhaps I’ve watched too many of his appearances for however many months.

Posted by: KChicago | September 10, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Well duh Dan. I don’t think Obama’s advocating yanking every soldier out at once. Ever heard of a phased withdrawal? I guess Sarah isn’t smart enough to know what she meant to say. Thank God there’s people like you to speak for her. Bravo!

Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

MJL,
Sorry, but I think you are wrong.
Today was at minimum a “Biden” moment.
He used the words inappropriately…he knew how they were taken moments after they left his mouth (he read audiences pretty well), and he did not distance himself from the way they were being taken…again, if his campaign keeps trying to deflect, they will be sitting in a very quiet room in November, wondering what happened to their sure thing.

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

So I guess the PUMAS are going to go for McCain’s throat for calling Hillary a pig????

Posted by: SP | September 10, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

If Obama said “The chickens have come home to roost”
McCain would say ” Obama called Palin a chick, and its offensive to women”.
But McCain says ” Obama is willing to loose a war to win an election” (which is treason) – and its not questioning Obama’s patriotism?
McCain loosing his bearings unless he can get 2.3 million more Republicans registered he is going to loose this election.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

As a Republican, I cannot wait to vote for Obama.
And THAT is putting country first…

Posted by: jvill | September 10, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Jake,
Why don’t you remind/inform your readers of what Palin herself said about Hillary’s “whining” during the primaries?

Posted by: Dawn | September 10, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Republicans are such hypocrites. For years they attacked Hillary viciously. The Pigman (that’s Rush Limbaugh) even attacked Chelsie when she was an early adolescent. Now they think that Palin’s gender makes her out of bounds for criticism.
Just because Palin used the word “lipstick” in a recent speech doesn’t mean she now owns that word. Republicans keep dumping truckloads of lies every day to distract the public from the harm they do. McCain owes Obama an apology for running an ad saying Obama wants to teach sex ed to kindergartners. Republicans owe Americans an apology for lying us into a war, outing a CIA agent, ignoring warnings about 9/11, doubling the national debt, spying on private citizens, gutting safety regulations and a thousand other crimes.
Here’s a special word to you blue-collar Republicans: How many times do you have to get hit over the head before you figure out who’s hitting you?

Posted by: Robert Lombardi | September 10, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

The hate spewed against Palin and the Republicans by the Obama supporters shows you that Obama and his people are a bunch of intolerant hate mongers. When the people in the US realize this, Obama won’t have a prayer of being elected.

Posted by: gary | September 10, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

“Well duh Dan. I don’t think Obama’s advocating yanking every soldier out at once. Ever heard of a phased withdrawal? I guess Sarah isn’t smart enough to know what she meant to say. Thank God there’s people like you to speak for her. Bravo!”…..Duh is exactly what you should say since you were unable to comprehend what I wrote. The key word was ‘stabilize’. If things aren’t stabilized on the ground the ‘phased withdrawal’ leaves those still on the ground in danger. Your savior doesn’t care if things are secure in Iraq, he simply wants us out. Yet if things aren’t secure in Iraq a phased withdrawal puts more Americans in danger. Hell, your candidate don’t get it why would I expect you to?

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Can someone please fund a university to build some sort of virtual reality where you can put on a helmet and actually enter the mind of GOP lunatic!!!! I’m so curious to see what the hell goes on inside those brains. Either these people are the most… I’m at a loss of words. I just don’t know anymore. I’m beginning to understand the argument that a few had given to me when they left this country to live elsewhere in 2004.
I still don’t understand what the choice even is here!!! At this point I couldn’t care less if Obama’s only experience was a paper route. He’s the only HUMAN BEING ON THIS TICKET!

Posted by: Hutch Beverly | September 10, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Well now that the ‘Piggy’ democratic daycare has let out for the day it’s time to head off to bed.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Gary
The only hate spew I see come out of Republicans. They trash community organizers, immigrants, and people that don’t agree with them. Look at what Bush did to the Justice Department. The last bi-partisan cabinet was quess what Bill Clinton’s. Bush has 1 democrat in his cabinet (Secretary of Interior I think).
First time voter voting for Obama/Biden 08. I am 1 in 2 million.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Dan, the surge worked. Iraq seems pretty stable to me. Violence is way down, US death are way down. Bush is moving 8000 soldiers from Iraq to Afghanistan. How stable does it have to be before we leave? Let the Iraqis take over their own country. We did our job, won the war. You can’t win an occupation. Give them their country back.

Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

To “you make me laugh”… seriously, I don’t think anyone wants to force, expects, or encourage you to jump for McCain/Palin. You should have your own right to vote. But as a person who truly respects Hillary for her strength. But please don’t think that all Hillary supporters are for abortion like you are. But really sad to see how you see so little of us women that don’t believe in the same thing you do. Not all Hillary supporters are like you… actually, many don’t hate like you.
You make me laugh said: “All these fake Hillary supporters and/or women so outraged by Obama’s comment – I was a Hillary supporter, I will NEVER be a Palin anti-abortion, anti-science, anti-polar bear supporter. EVER. So all you fakes trying to encourage women like me to peel away from the Obama-Biden ticket…dream on, it ain’t gonna happen!
Happy to not be a Republican liar, cheat and hater”

Posted by: KChicago | September 10, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Ok, I give up. Maybe on another day, there will be discussion of the issues before us. If not, I’m afraid this election has diminished to nothing more than name calling, lies, and empty rhetoric. From the candidates down to their supporters.
Americans need to put all this “trash” talk to the side and size up the candidates on the things that will affect them in the future. There are a lot more serious issues out there besides the discussions I’m seeing here. I’m surprised ABC even posted this article.
I think we should all be on our knees and ernestly asking God to indeed, bless America!
Goodnight.

Posted by: david from texas | September 10, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

“The only hate spew I see come out of Republicans. They trash community organizers, immigrants, and people that don’t agree with them.”
Look at the posts on this blog. These are the kind of people that you want to be associated with? I’d be ashamed to be a Democrat.

Posted by: Mack | September 10, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I’ll change the saying: “Like father like son” to “Like Leader Like follower”.
What a complete waste of space w/these piggy faces and piggy comment. We get you. I am sure even voters on your side would agree this is childish… and a waste of space

Posted by: Aurora | September 10, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Lipstick smears – just like Republicans.

Posted by: kyle | September 10, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Samantha, I hope you get this
Obama never said “typical white person”, that was Hillary. I heard it come straight out of her mouth. So, stop your lying or just simily grossly misinformed. One of those low information voters, uh

Posted by: cynthia | September 10, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Mack,
Last post of the night, this site is being overrun apparently.
Just to point out the obvious problem with your argument….John McCain pushed for comprehensive immigration reform that most Republicans thought was too soft on illegal (and that is what they are if they are not here legally) immigrants.
That was part of the 10% when he did not vote with his party…now, can you give me examples of the >6% when Barack Obama voted against his party?

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Much ado about NOTHING.
Don’t check your intelligence at the door.

Posted by: Shelley | September 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Republicans have NO platform so THIS is what they stoop to.
Distract, distract, distract.
WHAT ABOUT THE ISSUES, GOP?

Posted by: RyanD. | September 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Mack,
Last post of the night, this site is being overrun apparently.
Just to point out the obvious problem with your argument….John McCain pushed for comprehensive immigration reform that most Republicans thought was too soft on illegal (and that is what they are if they are not here legally) immigrants.
That was part of the 10% when he did not vote with his party…now, can you give me examples of the >6% when Barack Obama voted against his party?

Posted by: Rocky | September 10, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Oh my god! What a great way to finish a long, long day. Thank you for the journalism, for the real reporting, for the hard questions, for calling them out on their BS. THANK YOU!!!

Posted by: furysmom | September 10, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

“can you give me examples of the 6% when Barack Obama voted against his party?”
Why vote AGAINST the party that knows what the hell they’re doing?
McCain NEEDED to vote against his party, they have DESTROYED this country.

Posted by: RyanD. | September 10, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

This is what me off about the Republican party. They accusse war hero’s of their service. They attack a public servant as racist, sexist, and elitist. The attack character not policies. That is how they when by slander. Slander is against the law. Republicans been doing it for so long that everybody thinks it’s the norm. Guess what we will have another Bush if we submit to more of theese character attacks.
McCain new strategy is to paint Obama has a racist, sexist. Notice how he deflect every comment as being racism or sexist. He is not about policy because he has none, he is about bringing the other candidate down. Just like Bush before him. If McCain wins, America loses.
That is not being unpatriotic that is the truth.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

Thanks, Jake, for a very common sense post.
I pray that Charlie Gibson listens to you. And that he really puts the fire to Sarah Palin’s feet, because no one else has yet. I’m really scared for this country if McCain/Palin wins.

Posted by: R | September 10, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

McCain has no education plan. The Law he attacks in the ad was actually for non-binding funding sex ed in grammar school. The schools didn’t have to teach sex ed to children. The law also was for protection against child sex offenders. So I guess
McCain/Palin is for Child abductions.
McPalin
Apalin
Appaling

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Sam said: “to “david from texas” and his following comment: Once he starts to tax the wealthy Amerians so hard, they will quit investing and therefore, the country will stay in recession.” — I sooooo agree with you.

Posted by: Aurora | September 10, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Cynthia!
“Obama never said “typical white person”, that was Hillary. I heard it come straight out of her mouth.”
Obama uttered those words discribing his grandmother during his first “race” speech…. YOu know; the one in which he is almost suffocated by American flags!
You could NOT have heard those words exiting Hillary’s mouth.
McCain and Palin!
COUNTRY BEFORE BROKEN DOWN DNC!

Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | September 10, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

JR in VA, just from your comment alone… I know you don’t understand what Republicans are looking for. And from your hateful and mindless post… I see there’s no use explaining it to you either. But just wanted to notify how crazy you sound.

Posted by: Aurora | September 10, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

one more point…
she does not own all phrases pertaining to LIPSTICK, just because she made that hookey mom/pit bull remark.
Btw, a PITTBULL is known to make UNPROVOKED attacks.

Posted by: and | September 10, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Avoiding issues Mcwar’s team is spreading false and twists opponent’s words.
He really has never known the sense of HONOR.
Remember – he pushed wheelchair..
His Temper – that what we see in every move of his Disgrace campaign.

Posted by: Linda, Fl | September 10, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Eyes Wide Open
What if what Obama said about his grandmother was true. That she was a typical white woman. I know some typical black people, and some typical Hispanic people. Obama would know his grandmother more then you would and maybe just maybe she was a typical white person.
You don’t know what racism is. You’ve live in a glass house for to long. Your an elitist. – - See how easy that was.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

I’d like to take issue with the author’s use of “ad lib” in this paragraph:
“…alluding to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s ad lib during her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech last week”.
Palin’s speech was very tightly scripted. There was no ad libbing then or since and her handlers have thus far studiously avoided any situations where she could deviate from the script. My guess is that they agreed to her upcoming “interview” with Charles Gibson because it’s structured to be a celebrity “puff piece” with no hard questions. Please, Charlie, say it isn’t so!

Posted by: Ken Katz | September 10, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Here we ago again with the hypocritical right and CNN and all the corporate media playing along. First, we get McCain constantly playing the POW/War Hero card anytime anyone criticizes him. Now we get Sarah Palin and the righties playing the gender card 24/7 on any comment. Obama did not call Palin a pig.. As both a mayor of a small town and the governor of Alaska, she has greedily fed at the earmark trough of the federal government gobbling up as much taxpayer money and pork as she could get.
Of course, CNN and all the networks play along with the charade rather than
educate the public as to issues. They want the slug feast and war to feed their profits and ratings. The media as always creates issues where there are none to stoke the flames of McCain and Palins divisive politics.
As regards the polls I find it interesting that no one on CNN has even divulged the fact that the polls have tightened due to the fact that the demographics of whose being has pulled has changed. If you look at most polls, they’ve increased the percentages of Republicans in the pool of people they are polling. What a surprise then that McCain’s numbers go up.

Posted by: david | September 10, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

But McCain says ” Obama is willing to loose a war to win an election” (which is treason) – and its not questioning Obama’s patriotism?
______________________________________
So Obama says:
“You know, the truth is that right after 9/11, I had a (flag) pin. Shortly after 9/11, particularly because as we’re talking about the Iraq war, that became a substitute for, I think, true patriotism, which is speaking out on issues that are of importance to our national security, I decided I won’t wear that pin on my chest…” — Barack Obama
WOULD YOU THINK VOTERS ARE WRONG FOR questioning Obama’s patriotism?
“I had learned not to care. I blew a few smoke rings, remembering those years. Pot had helped, and booze; maybe a little blow (WHICH IS A FELONY) when you could afford it. Not smack, though. …” — Barack ObamA
WOULD YOU GET UPSET IF I QUESTIONED OBAMA’S JUDGEMENT & WOULD YOU CALL ME A RACIST?
JUST TO KEEP THINGS REAL, IT IS THE DNC THAT HAS NOMINATED AN ADMITTED COCAINE USER WHO SAT IN A RACIST CHURCH FOR 20 YEARS, WON’T WEAR A FLAG PIN, BOUGHT HIS HOME FROM A CRIMINAL, AND ASSOCIATES WITH A MAN WHO CONSPIRED TO BOMB THE US CAPITAL…
SO HOW IS OBAMA BEING VICTIMIZED AGAIN?

Posted by: Samantha | September 10, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Barack has NO experience in a contested race, and so has no tools for dealing with these people. He has lived such a greenhouse life that speaking before a group of prickly, Bible-toting DEMOCRATS is a chore, frightening, disconcerting.
Obama MAY have some notes before each rally, but his essential REFUSAL to come clean about his Mommy-Marxist-Ayers-Alinski core beliefs forces him to dissemble, fog, prevaricate… essentially LIE to America!

Posted by: gary | September 10, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Who cares if he was talking about her? Get over it.

Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

gary
The primaries are a contest race.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

We can debate what Barack Obama did or did not mean when he made his lipstick-on-a-pig statement, ’til way past election day, and both sides will continue to spin it with ease.
The real point is, no gentleman would have made that statement. Had he thought it through before he spoke, he would agee that it could be offensive to others.
I would ask of him, are not his character and manners atleast as important to him as his rhetoric?

Posted by: Leo G | September 10, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Anyone, and I mean anyone who could take Obama for a sexist is looking through a glass dimly lit.
Come now, the “lipstick on a pig” reference was about policy. We know, McCain knows, everyone knows it. So let’s get past this one.

Posted by: Roz | September 10, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

On Monday in Michigan, Obama became exercised when talking about the need to give even suspected terrorists legal rights.
“We may think this is Mohammed the terrorist,’’ he said at a campaign rally, but “it might be Mohammed the cab driver. You might think it’s Barack the bomb thrower. But it might be Barack the guy running for president.’’
Continuing, he got more heated, his voice booming. Referring to the Constitution, he said: “Don’t mock the Constitution! Don’t make fun of it! Don’t suggest that it’s un-American to abide by what the founding fathers set up! It’s worked pretty well for 200 years!’’
He finished with a sigh: “These people.”
Uh, Senator… when our founding fathers found themselves having to deal with Musslemen terrorists, they “set up” United States Marines! OOH-RAH!*
What they did not do is squander time deliberating which parts of our constitution apply to said terrorists.

Posted by: terry | September 10, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

Joan
Nobody is talking about issues anymore its over you will accept Palin Obama has thats why hes talking about her!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Can you imagine what Republicans would say if Obama had an unmarried, knocked up 17-year old daughter? You’d never hear the end of it. They’d preach about “family values”. They’d say Obama was a terrible parent. But not sarah palin, oh no, she’s a saint.

Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Terry
Well said. You almost made me want to join the marines. I don’t think I have the stomach to kill anybody though.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Let it be known that Ms swift is indeed a sycophant of the highest order.Her children are definately smart enough to understand that all she insinuating doesn’t make any sense.No one was been called a pig and we do not have pigs campaigning to be Veeps,so Ms Swift quit your innuendos and lets go back to issues that matter to this country.

Posted by: joseph CA | September 10, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Susan:
—————————————–
Ahem… Jeremiah Wright. Clinging. William Ayers. Tony Rezko. . Not being Black Enough… Perspective is a funny thing when you put on the partisan blinders… I wouldn’t be so quick to say the media has given Obama a pass on everything. I guess it depends on which MSM outlet you prefer… I’m guessing you’re a FOX News fan, aren’t you?

Posted by: Travis | September 10, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

Can any of the posters here who are supporting Mccain tell me what proposals he has made that will benefit you personally? Not the country. Just you, yourself? Thanks

Posted by: shaaronie | September 10, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Roz
stop the scriptural metaphors… Im a ministers son and I find the thinly veiled cultlike stuff apalling… you obamabots are scared and well you should be!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Bill
Take it to the republicans in the voting booth.
“It’s not an immigration issue its a drunk driving issue”-Geraldo
“No he should’ve been deported” -O’Reilly
Immigrants don’t jump the border to drink and drive.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

“Can you say you’re better off after 8 years of Bush? Then why in the hell would you vote for McCain? ”
__________________
Because you “dissed” Hillary and Bill Clinton and got stuck with an empty suit with a skinny resume. who sold you a story packed in two minimally autobiographical novels !
You were stuck with a Chicago charlatan type politician immersed in sweet talk and empty promises.
WE don’t want to be stuck with someone who will toss the whole country under the bus along with his other castaways….because of his inexperience and far flung ideologies…
Go away B O.
Far, far away!

Posted by: between the ears. | September 10, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

With Obama’s cohorts ACORN going to town registering people We’re going to be looking at
massive
voter fraud. To beat Obama, McCain is going to need a huge lead in the polls to offset the deceased and citizens of other countries who’ll be voting.

Posted by: terry | September 10, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Todd Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party (AIP) from 1995-2002. It is the crime of treason under the Smith Act of 1940 to support overthrowing “any government in the United States.” The Alaska Independence Party exists to cause the secession of Alaska from the USA. Sarah Palin is recorded on video giving a speech to the AIP at their 1994 convention. Why hasn’t the Federal prosecutor in Alaska indicted Todd Palin for treason under the Smith Act? Was Sarah Palin’s 1994 speech to the AIP a support of Alaska’s seccession from the USA or treason?

Posted by: M.A.Langenkamp | September 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

between the ears
yea hes tossed pretty much the whole country under the bus

Posted by: stanaim | September 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

JANE SWIFT heading up a Palin TRUTH Squad??!!!???
Now that I’ve stopped laughing – Jake, please please please write about what delicious irony that is! Swift demonstrated while governor of Mass. that she’s about as dishonest as an Alaskan winter night is long, using state helicopters to commute to and from work and using state employees to babysit for the twins she gave birth to while in office (all the while claiming that her husband was a stay-at-home dad). There’s more I can’t remember off the top of my head. It all cost her the governorship.
How delicious – heading up a Truth Squad!
Obviously, she and Palin are kindred spirits!

Posted by: Jill Nikolaides | September 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

staniam
really. Republicans have lost 300 thousand members since primaries. Democrats posted over 2 million in gains. New registrants aren’t polled and neither are voting blocks that don’t regularly vote (Likely voter polls). The majority polls use landlines and not cell phones. The majority of polls sampling is small compare to the numbers that actually vote. McCain ahead in the polls don’t bother me. Obama ahead in the polls don’t bother me. I remember Iowa.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

between the ears
Let me be the one to say it first. You get what you deserve. Just because you’re mad you didn’t get Hillary doesn’t mean you’ll ruin it for the rest of us in the country. That is pretty darn selfish.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

SURE MM, AND THAT IS WHY I HAVE GOTTEN MORE PEOPLE NOT TO VOTE FOR OBAMA THAN ANYONE.

Posted by: Samantha | September 10, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

The “Republican Hypocrisy” never fails to astound me.

Posted by: Cathi | September 10, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

“. Obama has been on the scene for almost 18 months and turned inside out concerning his background, his beliefs,his family,his minister,his lack of flag pins. ”
EIGHTEEN MONTHS…. with MINIMAL vetting
you find B O ready for the POTUS because you like the sound of his voice and his chant of “Change” (no matter to what) even though he has acknowledged that the smooth talking preacheries he renders as a smooth talking Chicago politician are “Words…. just words!”
You ought to be ashamed of yourselves!

Posted by: between the ears. | September 10, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Thank you for this honest journalism.

Posted by: Adrienne | September 10, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Out come the Truth Squad making up more stuff as they go along – poor little Palin – she now has some Security guards to make sure she doesn’t get hurt !!
Obama should take McCane to task for his latest RUDE and DISGUSTING ad.
Can you believe we are letting that stuff go by.
We have to get down and dirty immediately

Posted by: rosie | September 10, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Samantha
Voter discouragement is your plan to win the election. HOW UNDEMOCRATIC, HOW UNPATRIOTIC, HOW UN AMERICAN!!!
Obama is getting people involved in the process. The American people are the only ones with the power to hold are elected officials accountable.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

MM
you Obama people dont get it you will not change the process you have to play by the conventional political rules and you look pretty hilarious doign it… Obama will lose!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

McCain all but slanders Obama in an ad regarding teaching school children about sex, when in reality O was talking about protecting small children from pedophiles, and he says the word “pig,” and all the repubs get all bent out of shape. Well isn’t that just too bad. Obama would never call a woman a pig. He is not that kind of man, but McCain has and would call his own wife worse.

Posted by: rzan1 | September 10, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

staniam
Being cynical doesn’t put health care on the table. If you really want change hold politicians accountable, make them pay for there mistakes. The American people should be the only people lobbying the government.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Jake: “It seems to me we should have one rule”
Republicans already have a rule. IOKIYAR
“It’s OK If You’re A Republican”
They won’t give it up.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 10, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Unfortunately, Obama is way too polite to actually mean something disparaging by that remark. McCain absolutely knows no shame. This false outrage is comical, and it will backfire.
And, I have the perfect response. Obama should say the following:
“I tell you what John, if you think I owe you an apology, I’ll make a deal with you. I’ll apologize to you after you apologize to the American people for supporting Bush’s disastrous policies for eight years, and for supporting the war profiteering. I’ll apologize to you after you apologize for your disgusting ads which intentionally misrepresent my positions over and over again. I’ll apologize you when you apologized Chelsea Clinton for calling her ugly, and saying that Janet Reno was her father. I’ll apologize to you and Ms. Palin when she apologizes to the good people of Alaska for charging them thousands of dollars to sleep in her own house. I’ll apologize to you and Ms. Palin when she apologizes for lying to the American public about accepting money for the bridge to nowhere. How about it John? You want to make that deal?”

Posted by: TVI | September 10, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

rzan1
get over it half the stuff you posted about palin is false because you are frantic and petrified Obama wont be elected now.. what will you do if he doesnt… its nto the end of the world you will pretty much have to accept it!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

They are a pretty arrogant bunch that Truth Squad. Should we be talking about them all day long – get over it.
They don’t inspire anything but whining – poor babies – it’s pathestic.

Posted by: rosie | September 10, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Republicans being called out for what they are. Lying hypocrites.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 10, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

haha. also, Palin said in her debut speech, what’s the difference between a hockey player and a bull (or some other animal)?
And she answered: lipstick.

Posted by: michelle | September 10, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

MM
looks like you have been mislead… Obama has far more former lobbysists working in his campaign… they hide the big contributions by having the lobbyists spouses contribute… you will be exposed if you want to think of Obama as some kind of savior… allI have tosay to you is “justice cometh, and right soon!” 7 weeks as a matter of fact get used to Obama failing!

Posted by: stanaim | September 10, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

michelle
you didnt actually pay attention to the speech..bearign your full civic responsibility is watchign both conventions start to finish nothing less!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Look up Jane Swift’s bio on Wikipedia!! Sarah Palin is her Clone.
Ms. Swift owes an apology to Mr. Obama!

Posted by: Barbara | September 10, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

stanaim
Just like you McCain supporters talk about something else when some one makes a good point. my original statements was about voters but anyway. McCain has more Federal lobbyist align with oil and banks. Obama has lobbyist but from the state level. They also consider unions to and advocacy groups as lobbyist also.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

michelle
I was thinking when she said that, “if she were a man, she’d be crucified.” – - Double standard.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

MM
so that makes Obama a hypocrite too he has lobbyists everyone does…I havent decided who Im voting for but Obamahas been weak start to finsih as a GE candidate… you are worried because he may not win

Posted by: Staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

Straniam
I feel a need to respond. I never mentioned Palin in my comment. I think you are talking to the wrong person.

Posted by: rzan1 | September 10, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

samantha
yep sure a few percentage pts of Hillary people are goign over to Obama but it takes only 1 pervent or less than one in gores case to lose an election and these people really deserve whats coming to them… all of a sudden to wake up and think they control the process is just ludicrous and sad for them… they didnt anymore study civics or care about poltics any any way before the phenom came along its not abotu the policies its about an american idol mentality which is unamerican in itself its based soley on qualifications and policy positions that are credible

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Staniam
The difference is the lobbyist working in states have no agenda over the federal. Federal lobbyist made the Enron loophole not state lobbyist. He wasn’t being hypocrytical. And to get rid of Lobbyist influence completely would take away a lot of groups that actually do good and don’t work for a corporation. For example Moms against war.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

I get it, it’s campaign time again.
Republicans are outraged, I say OUTRAGED, with Democrats using the English Language.
And all because they do not want to talk about the Economy, Home Forclosures, Unemployment, Education, Healthcare, Broken Military, Debts and Deficits, etc. etc. etc.
We understand. Your policies were responsible for this disaster.
It’s time for the grown ups to set things straight again and on the right track again. FDR had to do it, Clinton had to do, now it’s Obama’s time.

Posted by: Polderboy | September 10, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Silly. But McCain didn’t take offense at being called an old fish? Even if Obama was alluding to Palin’s pit bull remark, I’m not impressed by the outrage. Silly republicans.

Posted by: B Russ | September 10, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

polderboy
dont you dare identify Obama with President Clinton after he said in Feb in an interview in Nevada that people fell through the cracks of the Bush and clinton admin….you are disgusting! We will not forget and you will lose going away because of it!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

what a load of crap! when mccain says it he is making a statement and when obama said he is speaking about the gop vp candidate!! you people are so full of crapola!! this phrase has been around for 75-100 years but now it is a slur against the gov. of alaska, be for real!! pitiful bunch you people are!!

Posted by: bearsr154 | September 10, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

Sarah Palin won’t even do an interview or answer unscripted questions because it will reveal she is utterly unqualified to teach courses at a high school level, let alone run a country.
She is a liar… she is crook… she is stateist… and above anything else she will help ruin the country right beside McCain.
McCain sold his soul to get nominated by his party. Everyone who knows anything knows that. The old McCain never had a chance with the powers at be, but the new McCain decided he would settle for being a puppet to fulfill his dream of being president… how sad.
I just wonder how many people voting for McCain can name a single thing that he has proposed that will improve the day to day life of your family, both now and down the road… that’s right, not a one, because he hasn’t. All he has proposed is that he will start wars with foreign nations.
If your biggest voting point is who is going to thump the bible harder, you are putting yourself and your individual beliefs ahead of the country, the constitution, and the rest of the world.
The last 8 years have been terrible for our country in so many ways, and we’re all really starting to get pinched hard personally from all the bad mistakes. Let’s get back on track and with someone who has vision, and get the people behind him to fulfill those visions.
People, we cannot continue down this road… the same people who control McCain are the same people who have killed the dollar, put us in debt to China (yes, China virtually owns us now), started conflict which drove gas sky high, got lots of people killed… the list goes on and on. Let’s get back to the America we all once knew…

Posted by: Jim | September 10, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

betwen the ears
these halfwits havent even read Dreams of MY Father which details his personality quersk and how he goes about tellign himself he can overcome it in the publics eyes by saying this or that…joining the black panthers etc etc typical head in the sand mentality…the O campaign has stayed stagnate for weeks and its not goignto change so just go away little Obots and just know that you learned your lesson in politics!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

stanium:
Re: your response to polderboy:
THANK YOU!

Posted by: america*centric | September 10, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

staniam
People did fall through the cracks in the Clinton administration. It doesn’t mean he was a bad President. See their health care failure. There has not been one perfect president in history.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

If the shoe fits, Palin and McCain should wear it!

Posted by: San Diego Dave | September 10, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

staniam
what are you talking about??? How have you done under Bush?

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

The most amusing thing is that the Obama apologists actually believe this was a smart move for Obama. To mention LIPSTICK-PIG when 40 million people just heard Palin mention LIPSTICK-Hockey Mom six days ago is Insanity. Obama nuked himself. Females are outraged and he will pay for this in votes whether Obama MEANT it or not. The perception is what matters and this is perceived as being SEXIST.
Hillary will go into Hiding now for sure. She is smart enough to avoid any association with Obama now.

Posted by: Leo | September 10, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

McCain’s promise that he would run a ‘honorable campaign’ is already broken.
That says enough about his other promises he is making in this campaign.

Posted by: Polderboy | September 10, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

If it turns out that Americans are THIS gullible, then the nation has no business declaring itself leader of the free world. I mean, this is just plain silly.
Is it just me, or have the republicans reduced themselves to the most transparent, cynical, and inelegant of manipulators. They don’t even seem to care that you can see the mechanics of the manipulation. They act as if video tape and audio recordings don’t exist and couldn’t possibly record their minute to minute contradictions. Either they are stupid or they think we are.
And I say this as a registered republican, absolutely slack jawed and embarrassed at how very, very far this party has fallen since Reagan.

Posted by: LA2000 | September 10, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

staniam
I’m not fooled. This misquote was highly politicized by the McCain camp and then Hillary. In truth he said the same thing in a interview with Charlie Rose. He saying that Republicans make theese people vote against there interest by pushing ridiculous arguments like Democrats will take your gun away or their atheist.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

Gee Janet Reno and ugly Chelsea seem kinda of sexist to me. In fact down right cruel, really unforgivable if you ask me.
This whole Palin thing is being played way too much by the McCain Campaign.
When is the press going to get serious about this Campaign? Who the hell is this wolf in sheep’s clothing anyway. She hiding repeats her speech that was written for her wont talk to the press, dirt coming up on her everywhere, and all you guys can do is give some glowing review of her.
Tell her a Pig has more intelligence than a Pit Bull with or without lipstick.

Posted by: Thinking | September 10, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am

McCain/Palin – I’ll break my first promise before being elected.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

m AND
I think you’re fooling YOURself, and I think you miss the point I’ve tried to make regarding my low opinion regarding Obama’s giving this intentionally unbecoming vignette about his grandmother on television in front of millions of people…. to put HIMSELF in a more favorable light!
When it comes to B O, “PUTZ” is still the word!

Posted by: between the ears | September 10, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Aren’t elephants and donkeys the dumbest animals around.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

“There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.” – Barack Obama
Now insert black for white, and pretend John McCain said it. It would be racist. But Obama says it and it is poetry.

Posted by: Samantha | September 10, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

MM
but when Obama said that it was unacceptable he was trying to gain votes in a dirty manner… we will not have this passive agressive bs in the white house…Obama himself may not do it but that snivelling spokesperson that lookes like Karl Rove but isnt does ..its only fitting since Obama is using Ws model to run for the presidency!

Posted by: stanaim | September 10, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

between the ears
Yeah except you leave out the 100 other speeches and townhalls when he talks about the people and not himself. I’ve seen Obama does townhalls, I think he does townhalls better then he does political rallies.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

staniam, if Obama can do as much as Clinton, I would be thrilled. If he becomes this century’s FDR, I’d be extatic.
But let’s elect him first and let’s elect lots and lots of Dems in Congress to get him going.

Posted by: Polderboy | September 10, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Obama’s lip stick / pig remark … and, Biden’s unsavory children with special needs remarks show us what a couple of creeps these two candidates are. In lieu of Sarah Palin’s comment about hockey moms, pit bulls and lip stick, Obama’s lip stick/ pig remark was extremely demeaning. Even though I am not an Obama supporter, at least I thought he had some degree of class and sophistication. He can try to cover his tracks by saying that the lip stick remark was not directed towards Governor Palin, but anyone with half a brain knows that’s exactly what he meant. I think Obama knows his campaign is in real trouble, and that’s why he’s stooping to such desperate, insulting and distasteful attacks. Obama is definitely not Presidential material.

Posted by: Gina | September 10, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

stanaim
I think your line of reasoning doesn’t make since. When people are challenging your character you have to talk about yourself and where you come from. We all don’t have POW experiences to deflect comments. If someones says you hate america, you have to address that.
And picking Palin wasn’t pandering to the Evangelicals to get elected.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

The pig wearing lipstick comment was first made by McCain (McNugget) when he belittled Hillary’s Health Plan. Obama’s point was in regard to the GOP Gang as business as usual and you can’t hide it behind a skirt and lipstick. Just picture Palin holding McCain as a baby with these GOP Gang members hiding behind her skirt: Bush/Cheney/Rove/Delay/Lott et al. American women voters aren’t stupid and they will be able to discern the slippery tricky Gop efforts to win them over by putting a woman up front. McCain couldn’t carry it so they built up the attention a little with Palin. But she won’t pan out…she has a newborn with problems and a pregnant teenage daughter who isn’t married and will need her more than ever. She should go home and take care of her family and forget her “me” ambitions. Bake cookies Palin – and by the way, don’t forget to put on your lipstick!

Posted by: Dar | September 10, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Gina
BS Biden didn’t even mention Palin, the media fabricated the story, and McCain is apparently guilty of using the same phrase.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Couldn’t agree w Obama more, and agree with the article that the distinction between taking something personally and understanding the message are two different things. What is true is that McCain is getting lots of new voters, drawn by a femal candidate who is glossy and lipsticky and new, but the worn out old ideas are not going to do the US public one bit of good. How can the public complain bitterly about the Bush tenure and then elect the same party with the same agenda YET AGAIN, and drag us all down with them? Catchy lines always emerge out of these political fights for voters’ minds, and another would be the “Surge to Nowhere.” What exactly has the US gained out of invading Iraq and then “staying to WIN,” except bankruptcy? It’s all madness. You can’t win against terrorist cells in land battle. You can’t claim that “the Surge” was the only factor in currently reduced violence in Iraq. It’s all mind-warp. Obama is just pointing out that behind all the excitement is the same, crippling mess of bad ideas and pathetic leadership to nowhere that has ruled us for the past 8 years.

Posted by: Nicky Hartzell | September 10, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

MM
Ok maybe he just just mangled the antipathy comment but it was still in poor taste and you people who think you are high minded and think if just everyone sees what you see.. well that happened in 1988 with Dukkakis and he was run out of town on a rail! you say its different poltics its not its the same well if they just see our side Hoping and changing etc etc… then you get broadsided by skilled polticos and say gee wasnt that fun… we dont have to go through that in another election cycle… so I suggest if he loses you jsut fade away because he was wrong in the first place… good intentions maybe … but wrong!

Posted by: stanaim | September 10, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

I’d really like to get the name-calling, etc, out of the way – we don’t have time to cloud the issues at this point. Let’s get on with getting Obama elected. I want him to stay on course and AMERICANS to be responsible & do their own homework instead of acting like this is high school, By the way – here’s a quote from Time Magazineto chew on: Alaska is, in essence, an adjunct member of OPEC. It has four different taxes on oil, which produce more than 89% of the state’s unrestricted revenue. On average, three-quarters of the value of a barrel of oil is taken by the state government before that oil is permitted to leave the state. Alaska residents each get a yearly check for about $2,000 from oil revenues, plus an additional $1,200 pushed through by Palin last year to take advantage of rising oil prices. Any sympathy the governor of Alaska expresses for folks in the lower 48 who are suffering from high gas prices or can’t afford to heat their homes is strictly crocodile tears.”

Posted by: DMKBC | September 10, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

stanaim
By your logic, anything any candidate does can be for getting votes and in that case your argument is mute and should vote on the issues. So far Obama is more concrete, more so then McCain.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

Nicky Hartzell
first of all 4 more yrs of the last 8 yrs is really dumb beyond belief as a slogan! nobody will get beyond the superficial stuff like lipstidck on a pig because Obama still hasnt bared his soul and revealed everything your supposed to on a campaign….he has to do more and he cant because he cant debate…just dont be too upset but hes lost and you have to accept it!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

The only reason Palin’s supporters thought that Barack Obama’s remarks had anything to do with her is because of their own personal views of their candidate.
But hey… Republicans like pork!

Posted by: Mark Kraft | September 10, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

homas
um hello… if Obama still refers to Palin by name its still about her and him… you people just dong get it and will be crushed in November but live and learn!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

stanaim
History is writen by the winners. We will never know if Dukkakis was right. But McCain/Palin is starting to reflect Mondale/Ferraro.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

You know what’s wrong for women?
A bunch of Republican men who have a habit of telling women what to do with their bodies, trying to tell them what to think as well.
Nice try, guys.

Posted by: Mark Kraft | September 10, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

MM
and my point is it doesnt matter … and by the way until he read a speech hat he hadnt seen till he read it when he accepted the nomination he has never ever talked about specific programs in detail you have to start to finish thats the way it is you will lose!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

MM
you are doing the insulting… you really have no credibility…Obama will lose thats it… you have nothing more to do here!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

staniam
Obama wrote his nomination speech – it was well reported that he did. Palin’s was written by Bush speechwriters (how they have a job I have no idea. Obama has a allot of concrete ideas. I would encourage you to go to the website and check out some of them. Don’t have to join donate or anything just look at them. You can criticize them but they are more concrete then John McCain.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

samantha
yea they can say in theory that Hillary is campaigning hard for Obama but the other day she said shes justt doing the democratic duty and she hasnt taken on Palin like stupid Obama is doing… David Gergen said it was stupid tonight on CNN get with it Obamabots!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Samantha: silly season for you too?
1) Alice Palmer had fabricated signatures. She tried to game the election. That’s unacceptable in any election.
2) It was the Media who made the ‘pimping out’ reference
3) Raising the sexist card everytime SP is criticized is sexist. Being a woman is not a defense.
What has Sarah actually done for women? Fired them?

Posted by: Polderboy | September 10, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

MM
thats true but all the speeches up until then were not written by him and the american public wants someone who can talk off the cuf not read a teleprompter….then again Obama is no President Clinton…

Posted by: stanaim | September 10, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

stanaim
The “Yes We Can” speech was written by Obama and was latter modified into a stump speech. The “Address to the Copper Union”, “Restoring America’s Promise”, are all major speeches written by Obama. Oh and the “Red States, Blue States” speech.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

american1
I believe it was reported that more male Hillary supporters are goign for Palin… you have a bigger problem in that too since Obama is perceived to be not all that masculine!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

Also watch Obamas townhall meetings on CNN website. Obama speech patterns carry a lot of ums all the time. It is not that he needs repair remarks, it is because he is a thinker. Thinkers think faster then they talk.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

MM
there is no proof of that only proof of the acceptance speech… and that still doesnt speak to the fact that he cant speak without a teleprompter!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

i wish he was calling that cow a pig. sigh.

Posted by: jake | September 10, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

President John F. Kennedy, standing by the Brandenburg Gate during a critical moment of the Cold War, declared: “ich bin ein Berliner” (I am a Berliner); a challenge to the Berlin Wall, the Soviet affront to freedom!
Imagine if Mr. Obama’s recent request had been granted. Imagine Mr. Obama standing by the Brandenburg Gate declaring “You can put lipstick on a pig, [but] It’s still a pig” (Sarah Palin is a pig)!

Posted by: C Smith | September 10, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

MM
that kind of speech patern is not acceptable in a president its annoying!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Obama’s campaign is just trying to change the subject because they are scared…
How do you like being losing?

Posted by: Giorgio | September 10, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

staniam
All those I mention speeches were well publicized that he authored those speeches. The man is a Harvard Graduate, It is not a stretch that he may know how to write. Also watch him interview Patraeous. C-Span.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

It speaks volumes of the Republican mindset to immediately assume that Senator Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” referred to Sara Palin and “old fish” referred to McCain. Isn’t it interesting to get a glimpse into what the Republicans are really thinking…

Posted by: LAmom | September 10, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

staniam
I’ll take annoying and right over sweet sounding and wrong.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

jazzygirl
you can preach all you want to Obama will not win at this point… sorry to dissapoint you… the issues dont matter they did before but not now!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

Obama talked just like Rev.Wright…. that was something he learned for 20 years sat in the pew

Posted by: Liat Tuh | September 10, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

McCain/Palin = Dukakis/Ferraro
They both got huge convention bounces.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Obama talked just like Rev.Wright…. that was something he learned for 20 years sat in the pew

Posted by: Liat Tuh | September 10, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

MM
you arent going to change anyones mind… youcan have your own private worship service of Obama,… I regularly gave to the DNC and past nominees he will get none of my money… I hear he is having a cash prob now lol

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am

Pause.
“Swift then suggested Obama was calling McCain a fish.”
Reporting is starting to rock again.

Posted by: Vincent | September 10, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

staniam
Who are you helping by foaming out the mouth? Have gone and looked at policies like suggested. Because every vote counts. 2 million newly registered voters and McCain/Palin = Dukakis/Ferraro. Dukakis/Ferraro got a 16 pt bounce at the convention. Guess you won that election Reagan.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

hah, are you people serious. You are going to decided an election based on one thing someone says. On some hypothetical slur or offensive comment… that’s just so ridiculous it would be funny if people weren’t saying it as if they believed it. This election is humorous but only time will tell if all this posturing and position will come to anything, you wonder how McCarthyism came about its just like this, by focusing on absurdities like and also having a primary disguising as a presidential election doesn’t help either, we only have one party in this country and its the business party. hah this is depressing and hilarious at the same time.

Posted by: david | September 10, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

MM
Mondale/Ferraro ’84 and Dukkakis/Bentsen ’88 let me guess you are too young to remember those campaigns… contrary to popular opinion… this is not just your campaign!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

staniam
You know I meant. That we have 57 states and what not. Mondale/Ferraro got a 16 pt bounce and Reagan won. I made the correction.

Posted by: MM | September 10, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

Obama is a Hypocrite. The Obamabots are dissmissive of McCain’s reputation as a POW, which is something that should be at the very least admired across all party lines. In a fit of arrogance and the need to have the attention focused on him, Obama pulled another “Tell what gets me votes” act. On an interview with ABC, he brought up that back in 1979 he considered joining the armed forces but, since we were not in armed conflict he rejected the idea (guess having over a hundred held hostage in Iran was not “armed conflict” enough).
So in the tradition of Dreams of My Father, Obama make up or embellishes stories to appear as something he is not.
Tell us Obama if you did consider joining the armed forces, why is the fact absent from your books? Why are you only bringing this up now? Interesting how you never brought up until you are is now down in the polls to a POW.

Posted by: Samantha | September 10, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

MM
Im a poltical science major that worked for the democratic tickets that you just mixed up… the main reason obama wont win because he encourages people to be novices.. you actually need to know somethign about electons and history to be able to be a part of a coampaign…an efffective part anyway… and you failed but thats ok!

Posted by: stanaim | September 10, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

What a gift! Thank you Republicans for revealing what you really think by ASSUMING Obama meant Sara Palin is a pig in lipstick and John McCain is an old fish.

Posted by: HAHA | September 10, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

Of course he was calling her a pig – just like he was flipping off Clinton after the ABC debate. He’s a lowlife scum and Dems who support this man are no better.

Posted by: oldspice | September 10, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

Duh folks its obvious that the repuglicans are simply driving a wedge between Obama and white (pretty stupid) women …. any woman want to call me sexist? Bring it on and take it like a man equal terms now sisters:-)

Posted by: mark 4 sense | September 10, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Hey, Palin was the one that started with the whole lipstick thing.
She just opened herself up for that one, and in her case it aptly applies.

Posted by: Venom | September 10, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

Obama must make a campaign stop in Alaska some time soon, and talk in a town hall with all interested people about the Bush with lipstick. More listen to them after his speech. That would be revealing, some her lies would be so exposed.
Obama/Biden 2008

Posted by: Oleg | September 10, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

Personally speaking, I love Obama’s comment and urge him to say it every day till the election. Come on Barry I dare you. Please don’t stop.

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

“Obama supporters try to be witty.
They try to say something profound. Sometimes, they are downright vile and rude.
No matter what Obama sympathizers and apologists say in public or online, We will press forward with the just cause of NObama!”
Obama: Yes We Can
NO YOU WON’T

Posted by: Samantha | September 10, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am

Typical Republican double standard: they’re allowed to criticize Democrats however they please, but if Democrats do the same, they’re INSULTING the Republicans and BY GOD they’re owed an apology.
Hypocrites, the lot of them.

Posted by: Traci | September 10, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

The Mcain campain is SO dishonest. How can they sleep at night?
This is yet ANOTHER “fake” outrage scandal that worked so well for Bush. How long will the media and gullable Americans fall for this crap? Not this time. The stakes are too high.
From the LA Times today:
McCain too has invoked pigs in criticizing opponents. When Clinton released her healthcare plan last year, the Arizona senator portrayed it as a remake of the one she proposed when her husband, Bill Clinton, was president. “I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” McCain said

Posted by: david56 | September 10, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

More Barry Hussein more. The white women vote only went up 20%.

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

A little over one year ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%.
Since voting in a Democratic Congress in 2006 we have seen:
1) Consumer confidence plummet;
2) The cost of regular gasoline soar to over $3.95 a gallon;
3) Unemployment is up to 6.1% (a 25% increase);
4) American households have seen $2.7 trillion in equity value evaporate
(stock and mutual fund losses);
5) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $1.5 trillion dollars;
6) 3% of American homes are in foreclosure.

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 3:25 am 3:25 am

This comment was a huge mistake on Obama’s part for the simple reason that we are ALL still talking about it. How can you appeal to those swing voters when you insert this overpowering noise into your message? You can’t.
A VERY BIG mistake. And sadly, he should have known better.

Posted by: Partagus | September 10, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

I love you Obama! Finally fighting them on their terms! This isn’t a reality-show, or soap opera! This costs lives!!!! This is damn serious!!!
Plain’s as reclusive as Cheney. Fires people as ‘loyalty tests’ in a small town of Wasilla.
Fires librarians.
Doesn’t talk about sex in schools.
Middle-Ages baby!!!
Plain is irrelevant but it shows what McCain is all about!!!
Obama-Biden-Democracy 08!!!!!!!

Posted by: Paul Mitchell | September 10, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am

Obama’s huge campaign message of the day, lipstick!
Joe Biden’s campaign of the day, more lipstick!
You can’t make this stuff up.

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

Palin is the first person to use a metaphor to describe herself. She called herself a ptbull with lipstick.
But I would point out that pitbulls are famous for eating children. Now I dont think Palin will eat her children but she has open up herself to other manners of comparison.
I know one thing, she lies very easily, smiling as she throw daggers.
It is something she has in common with Hillary. They will say anything to get what they want. They dont seem to know the difference between telling the truth and telling a lie.
Thow shall not bear false witnesses (LIE) is a commandment of the CHRISTIAN BIBLE, isnt it?

Posted by: mal | September 10, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

Lipstick, lads. That’s the message of the day. Can’t you dems stick on message?

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

When ads were run in August discussing Obama’s relationship to Ayers, Obama’s campaign demanded that the Department of Justice criminally investigate the group behind the ads. (What criminal charges that were justified by running an ad were never explained.) It is bad enough that a senator demands criminal charges against a political opponent, but this becomes a real problem if the president of the U.S. asks his justice department to do take on his political foes.

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

To Samantha (who posted today’s poll results):
Dis you post the polls when McCain was losing?
Did you post them when he was pronounced dead in the primaries?
Dis you post Bush’s approval rating?
Will you post them when people learn’ about Palin’s zealotry and her campaign collapses like a house of cards?
10 days ago no one knew the name Palin. In 10 days it will a new national punch-line.
You can’t learn national and international history-policy in a two-week crash course.
Obama-Biden-Democracy 08!!!

Posted by: Paul Mitchell | September 10, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

“if the president of the U.S. asks his justice department to do take on his political foes.”
Posted by: HarleyDavidson
Thats funny hasnt Bush been doing that exact same thing for the past 8 years? Remember Colin Powell who USED to be Sec of State but fell out of favor because he didnt go along with the evil Empire…..no difference in McCain.

Posted by: Doug | September 10, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

So it’s ok for McCain to use this common analogy but not ok for Obama?

Posted by: DarksideHero | September 10, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

Obama wasn’t talking about a person, he was talking about a policy,
Jane Swift? That’s all they’ve got for their spokesperson for their cute little “Truth Squad”? (As if a Republican would know anything about “truth”,)
She’s the embarrassingly inept former Governor of Massachusetts whom Mitt Romney elbowed out of the way by bribing the sexist party elders. He was successful in this effort because a) The Republican Party hierarchy is an exclusive boys club here, and b) because Jane Swift is a feather-headed lightweight with the intellectual capacity of a sea-sponge.

Posted by: neil | September 10, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Well at least the Republicans have got a new chant for their next public meeting (seeing as ‘drill, drill, drill’ is gettng so old):
“dog in lipstick good, pig in lipstick bad”, “dog in lipstick good, pig in lipstick bad”, “dog in lip stick good, pig in lipstick bad”

Posted by: david | September 10, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Mary,
That expression has been used by many since this campaign started. It was picked up from the 4 years ago I believe.
Palin is late to the party. If you all were worried about the association you should have been more careful about setting yourselves up for it.
She doesn’t get the executive parking space because she’s a woman.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Pitbull to Victim to Pitbull to Victim.
Which will she play with the Russians?

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

The “Palin Defense Committee” is just as simple-minded as its candidate, more so, I’m sure, or believes the American public to be – what a ridiculous bunch of charges. My third-grade nephew could see through her absurd allegations about Obama doing name-calling.

Posted by: racetoinfinity | September 10, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Imagination? Sounds a lot like Obama’s campaign lately.

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 4:20 am 4:20 am

Hey,
Chuck Norris is on Larry King tomorrow.
Maybe he’ll throw down a gauntlet and challenge Obama to a joust to protect Palins honor.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am

I find it funny that Republicans need a truth squad when everyone else lets truth stand alone a complete thing no support needed.

Posted by: James Wilson | September 10, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am

Okay,
Its the creative hour.
First side to produce an actually funny Chuck Norris campaign joke gets my vote.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am

Quote “Why should anyone believe McCain didn’t mean it about Hillary Clinton, but Obama meant it about Palin?”
You’re kidding, right? If Obama didn’t mean it I have to question the man’s judgment if not his sanity. I would guess a large part of that audience though about Gov. Palin when he said it. He really isn’t that good if he hasn’t got prompters.

Posted by: John | September 10, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am

John,
Hillary has taken so many knives that she doesn’t feel pain anymore and no one needs to defend her.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

Which will now queue the hand-wringing psychobabble.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

A Truth Squad, specializes in smearing lipstick on a pig…and calling it a gazelle.

Posted by: Paul | September 10, 2008, 4:33 am 4:33 am

I suspect we won’t have to worry about offending Ms. Palins delicate sensibilities for very long.
The double standard stuff is pretty transparent. I’d save it for the big lies.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

Night. Gotta get some sleep before work myself.

Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 10, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am

Porky Palin snuffling up to the 27 million dollar earmark trough! If the shoe fits, wear it.

Posted by: Eva LeRoi | September 10, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

Hmmm,
Not sure you Republicans want to get into a game of “The Price is Right”.
That’s a subject that hasn’t worked so well for you over the years.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:48 am 4:48 am

317 Days of per Diem at home!!!
That’s a LOT of lipstick.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

Chico,
I’ve been thinking. Maybe Rove has his price. After all he is a Republican.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

BratKid – I hope that answers your question.

Posted by: Chico | September 10, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

The Biggest PIG in America are our Top 5 OIL Companies who each made over $40 Bilion in Profit, in each of the last 5 Years in a Row ! They are still Raping the American Consumer and no one is doing anything about it ! I really admire Palin for going up against the BIG OIL companies, and she now gets my Vote. The Biggest Enemy against the USA is our own BIG OIL Companies, not the Talibans, or Alquida, or the Poor Innocent Iraqi Citizens. Didn’t we learn anything from the ENRON Scandel ?

Posted by: Steve ONeill | September 10, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

This is pathetic. The world is on fire and lying jerks try to turn innocent comments into gender attacks worthy of an apology. Obama said nothing that Mc Cain hasn’t said before. Give it up! I’ll apologize for Barack; to all offended pigs.

Posted by: gritman | September 10, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

I think Republicans are just too d*mb!!!!! period.

Posted by: Rina | September 10, 2008, 5:38 am 5:38 am

You would expect debate about Iraq, economics, Russia, taxes, health care, globalism, pollution, oil, widening gap between rich and poor or an ingenue as possible VP.
What do you get in the US-Elections? Talk about pigs, lipstick and fish. Nice level, very sophisticated and impressive for the world. Are McCain and Obama mad, or is something wrong with the American Election System?

Posted by: George Knight | September 10, 2008, 5:38 am 5:38 am

If Sarah Palin were homely at all, conceiveably, the idea of Obama calling her a pig might have some traction.
Little Sarah is a very beautiful woman so any reference to her looks could only be flattering to her.
On the other hand John McCain once made a very crude and cruel joke about Chelsea Clinton and Janet Reno.

Posted by: gasdocpol | September 10, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

Sarah Palin’s Truth Squad is just like Best Buy’s Geek Squad. Only one thing they missed – you can’t be a geek if you’re stupid and can’t solve any problems. So both instances can be characterized as ‘putting lipstick on a pig’.
Btw, Obama, great work. That’s how you win, with their own weapon. Does Karl Rove think he invented this? It’s been around since 1930.

Posted by: ivy | September 10, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am

If you support McCain fine. But don’t degrade yourselves by defending these scumbags that work for him.

Posted by: DennisNC | September 10, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am

Palin isn’t ready for the job. She is inexperience to be VP. 20 months aren’t enough for the top job. I am sorry for the REPUBLICANS in November election.

Posted by: I.A.T smith | September 10, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am

If Palin can call herself a dog (Pitbull!) why can’t others call her a pig? Fair is fair…
What happened to that free speech she says America represents by the way too?
Maybe she should go back to banning information in libraries and stopping womans rights to chose again!
- O’ wait, she never stopped doing that.

Posted by: America - A Nation Of Sheep | September 10, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am

No, McCain, Obama did not call Sarah Palin a pig.
He called her lipstick.
You, McCain, are the pig.

Posted by: Robert Henry Eller | September 10, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am

Awwwww, poor Ms. Palin! If she and her handlers cannot handle the rough and tumble of the political campaign then perhaps they should withdraw. The expression used by Obama and, by the way, McCain on occasion has been around for a very long time. This is just more nonsense from the Republican Party who thinks that using Carl Rove’s smear, hate, fear and distraction will win them the White House once again. I am betting that the American people are smarter than that this time around and won’t fall for it. Of course the choice of Palin was calculated to energize the right wing religious fanatics who in all likelihood will fall for it once again. Pathetic that this is the best the Republican Party and John McCain can do.

Posted by: Brian, Atlanta, GA | September 10, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

Sarah Palin put herself in this limelight, and she better be able to take allot more then a mere reference to something she said originally, that happened to have a backlash effect on her. I still can’t understand why a woman in her particular situation, of being a mother of five children, and one baby of only five months old with downs syndrome, who has already achieved the rank of Governor, would want to pursue an even more time consuming position? I think the woman is out of control, and if her husband loves her, he will do his best to help her cool it, and be more of a mother and wife first. If she is such a good Christian, as she professes to be, she’ll realize her position and role as a mother and wife should be her first, and most important priority. Why would she want to throw herself into the public arena, and have her life made completely available for the media to have a field day with? Is fame and prestige that important to her, that she would jeapordize her family to this kind of exposure? This woman has major issues with her life in the direction it should be going, and somebody ought to set her straight, like her husband, or parents. John McCain is only using her for his own political gain to sway the women voters over to his side, with no regard for her personal obligations to her family. Afterall, he didn’t care enough about his original family, who he abandoned for Cindy,because she had more to offer him money wise.

Posted by: jms55 | September 10, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

I don’t care about lipstick or pigs or Bristol Palin’s pregnancy or the fact that Governor Palin is an experienced big game hunter. I want reporters to stick to the issues that candidates will be dealing with should they become elected. Everything else is manipulative distraction, perpetrated by the campaign managers, television news managers pandering to the lowest common denominator, and shock jocks. Not all of us are sleepwalking through this election cycle. It’s less than 2 months before a presidential election, yet I suspect that Gibson’s interview of Palin will dig no deeper than a beauty contest interview. I hope he surprises me but I’m not holding my breath. These days I miss REAL reporting, a la the likes of Cronkite and Huntley/Brinkley.

Posted by: Deb S. | September 10, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

Leave it to idiots you know John MCcain and Sarah Palin to focus more on irrelevancies than issues. I don’t care about these petty irrelevant verbal disputes because when comes down to it I am voting for the candidate who can
1.) Help fix the economy, fact is it sucks, eight years of Bush and a republican led congress has been a disaster.
2.) Help the US move forward in terms of civil rights, the US has been dragging its heels in this department mainly because of a republican led congress and administration.
3.) Help the US establish better relations with other countries, we tried George W. Bush’s approach look where it got us.
MCcain and Palin won’t fix these problems because they are like any other republican, duo that has ever been, that is they stick with tradition and rarely do anything to bring about positive change.

Posted by: Nate | September 10, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

No one can deny that if Governor Palin were a man, she would never have been picked.
Say what you will about Obama’s experience, but he has been vetted over and over through the primary season by voters and the media. He won the nomination fairly after campaigning in every state and got millions of votes.
One man made the Palin decision on very little information. One man decided that the free world could be ruled by someone with no foreign policy experience and little exposure to much of America and the world.
With no real clue on how Gov. Palin might engage China, Russia, Iran, or other rogue states, McCain gambled all of our futures.
Would you entrust the safety of your children to someone you’ve only seriously talked to once? Especially when you knew they were at serious risk from the outside?
Isn’t that the definition of “being willing to lose a war to win an election?”
Even if the Palin gamble works flawlessly, gamblers eventually lose and lose big. America can’t afford that type of decision making style after watching Bush do it for 8 years.

Posted by: jp | September 10, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am

If Senator O. had combined moose and lipstick in his statement he would have been talking about BULLWINKLE PALIN!!!!!!

Posted by: BillForObama | September 10, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am

Charlie Gibson, incensed at the low expectation the world has of his pending interview decides to come out swinging. The ensuing dogfight forces Palins handlers to tranquilize and muzzle him, then put him on a plane to the coast. Then the public statement that “Sarah is not giving any more interviews until she is treated with the respect and deference accorded to a lady of her stature”.
And then the snooze alarm went off.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am

Obama dont needs to apologize and stop the name calling.
imagine a pig with a lipstick is a leader of this great nation just after a month or two…
god help US

Posted by: eduardo | September 10, 2008, 6:17 am 6:17 am

Please, everyone answer just one question :
Why honored man and busy executive woman are running around the country spreading false in every word they said?
Why?
That would be the answer about intentions of them, their sense and their Value for this election.
If You want to elect leaders ,lying You every time – this ticket is right for You.
But think one more time – does it also fit for Your next generations and would You be fogiven for Your choice by them.

Posted by: Linda,Fl | September 10, 2008, 6:21 am 6:21 am

“If Hillary had made a now-famous lipstick joke a few days before McCain used the phrase, wouldn’t it be right to question if he was calling her a pig?”
No, it wouldn’t.
What would be right would be to look at what was actually said. Obama didn’t mention Palin, not even indirectly. He DID refer to McCain’s policies and calling them change. Those are the pig and the lipstick.
The idea that Obama was referring to Palin because she used the word lipstick previously is frankly nuts. Do you really think Obama should be banned from referring to lipstick, even in using a common phrase, because Palin used the word?

Posted by: Aengil | September 10, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

linda
Obama has been lying to you for 19 months

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

I think we can ALL remember what John McCain said about Chelsea Clinton. Lets bring that up. Then how about what he called his wife? HUH? You people spin so fast I’m surprised your brains don’t come dribbling out your ears.

Posted by: Frank in OH | September 10, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am

ENOUGH!!!!!
How McCain Palin will make America safer:
1. Sarah will keep sounding like a CRUSADER, while the terrorists plot in AFGHANISTAN.
2. Sarah will get on the job training on how to be president and VICE President in case cancer survivor McCain goes under the knife on day ONE.TWO…THREE…
3. If John survives day one, he will have to be shown how to use a computer in order to write in the encrypted CODES to launch the NUKES at all those ENEMIES BUSH has made…John will have to hope that RUSSIA has not heard that he is computer ILLITERATE….DUH….
4. John will have to hope the Russians are not still ANGRY with him for his statements and support of Georgia.
YOU GUYS ARE IN DEEP S if those 2 get in…ON DAY ONE!!!!
ENOUGH!!!!!!! WAKE UP BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE

Posted by: Gregan | September 10, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Repulican just can not stop the lies. I can’t believe how many times that Palin has talked about the bridge to nowhere. By now everyone know this, and everyone is sick of this. Did she accomplish anything else in Alaska? This is just another BUSH!

Posted by: PHD | September 10, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am

Does anyone have a clue what lipstick on a pig means?
“when someone tries to dress something up, but is still that something.”
Boy, no wonder our society is going down the tubes.

Posted by: jim | September 10, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am

Gregan
its too late for you Mccain will be president and you will be drafted to do what mccain tells you to do!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

everyone know that Obama is a child .
He never never can do anything with terrorists ,Russia………..

Posted by: jim | September 10, 2008, 6:35 am 6:35 am

To the person who wrote:
Todd Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party (AIP) from 1995-2002. It is the crime of treason under the Smith Act of 1940 to support overthrowing “any government in the United States.”
Advocating succession from the United States, of a State, Is a far cry from attempting to over throw the United States. But I doubt that pointing that out to you will aid you in absorbing it, that would require some common sense on your part.

Posted by: beowulf1 | September 10, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am

“Truth Squad”? Here we go abusing the poor English language some more. I’ve had about enough of the Neocon “Truth Squad” that “truthed” us into an unnececcary war that has devastated a lot of people in both countries. This “Truth Squad” should be truthful and name themselves the “Spin Squad”, or better yet, “The Propaganda Squad”.

Posted by: Edward | September 10, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am

Obama is losing his coolness, the slogans don’t work anymore …….now he start to insults the intelligent of the American voters …..

Posted by: sampf15 | September 10, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am

PHD
you are about to be put in your place in regards to your support of Obama… hes not going to win and it was foolish at best to think you could get anything out of it!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Could the Mccain camp be playing the “gender” card? Gasp!

Posted by: Randy | September 10, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am

Time has come for Obama to go on the offensive. The electorate is not fact-checking the claims of the ‘right’. Middle America is certainly not reading the Huffington Post, they rely on FOX to elaborate on the stories. Go on the Attack Obama, yes ‘they are stupid’

Posted by: Shawn Michael | September 10, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am

Once again, McCain and his lobbyists demonstrate that when it comes to Language Arts standards, they score a proficiency level of “not met.” Looks like they’ve been left behind.

Posted by: kta | September 10, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am

rkb seems pretty calculated that they are suddenly using “lipstick” to describe negative things.
BBBWWWAAHHH!!!! (not to be confused w/whining!)
yeah it totally seems clear that since palin used lipstick to describe herself as a dog (positive!)the republicans should be the only one’s who get to use lipstick analogies in the campaign!!!!
it is so unfair the bots are stealing our lipstick! it’s..it’s CALCULATING!
and the nerve of obama to ‘describe negative things’.
he’s horrid! i’m voting for mcPOW.

Posted by: annie | September 10, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am

The McCain campaign (GOP) have NO ISSUES to run on. . .so they’ve divised a great strategy. . .Name calling !!!
Now that’s change we can believe in. . .no health care; no middle class; more jobs overseas; the economy tanking (check your 401K lately?); poor standing around the world. . .and the only thing we can do is call each other names ?? Pathetic. And we will deserve what we get, because the American people are obviously Low-information (STUPID) voters. Talking about celebrity. . .OK Palin supporters, why can’t we talk to her ???
Everyone else gets interviewed. .questioned, etc. . But NO. She has to be protected. What happens at the debate?? Questions in advance maybe ?? She already indicated tshe KNOWS NOTHING about the Fannie/Freddie debacle. . .and I’m sure her knowledge on many issues is lacking.
The idea here is to keep that a secret, and maybe we won’t notice. I’m a woman who can honestly say, . .she’s a liar, cannot keep her teenage daughter straight, and yes, she’s a Pig !!! If she can’t take the heat, stay OUT of the kitchen.

Posted by: BJ | September 10, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am

Sounds like the Obama camp is getting desperate and ramping up its personal attacks. So much for a “different kind of politics”. The Democratic deserve to lost this election. Their leadership knew during the primaries that HRC would have been a more difficult candidate for McCain to run against but they pushed BO anyway. Now they are launching childish smears against Palin – so much for them being advocates of women!

Posted by: Asia2PA | September 10, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

The “bridge to nowhere”, has become the “lie to nowhere”.

Posted by: Randy | September 10, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

Obama is very cool.

Posted by: PHD | September 10, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

Ignore Jane Swift, she is a moron. She probably tought Palin everything she knows about how to waste taxpayer money. Remember, Swift is the one who used state police helicopters to fly her family around, used her staff as private daycare, the list goes on and on. All after not even being elected too, nice.
The fact that she could not even recognize the double standard, even when pointed out to her, just proves she is a total and complete idiot who never deserved to be Governor of our state.

Posted by: MikeT | September 10, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am

Deb S. – I couldn’t agree with you more. The issues are falling off the cliff and the result will be the American people paying a dear price for making a choice based on what? I have to say, though, Obama, to his apparent detriment, keeps trying to stick to issues but McCain’s campaign people keep pouncing and twisting things around. It’s a distraction. The republicans are good at that. If you keep ‘em having to respond to garbage, the issues get lost. They (McCain’s campaign) said it themselves – “This election is not about issues. It’s about personality.” With that kind of mentality, we, the American people, are headed for a fall.

Posted by: outtahere | September 10, 2008, 6:43 am 6:43 am

Asia2PA,
It makes me laugh how you Republicans all of a sudden are so sure Obama is going to lose. Democratic registration is up by the hundreds of thousands (most of which I’m sure are NOT being polled). Republican registration is down by the hundreds of thousands. Even you can do that math. It equals a Obama/Biden landslide. Sorry:(

Posted by: Randy | September 10, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Randy
you are fooling yourself Im a democrat that will vote repub for the first time in my life Obama will not win in a landslide in any scenario… you are scaredand should be… you did all this work for nothing just as usless as the Obama people!

Posted by: staniam | September 10, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am

Obama, you have my blessing to mop-up the floor with McCain and his beauty queen VP! GO ON THE ATTACK OBAMA! Hillary said that she didn’t think you could stand-up to the Republican Attack Machine and maybe she was right! You have to go on the offensive! Show all of Palin’s lies in her acceptance speech (AND THERE ARE MANY) and continue to link McCain with Bush! In the words of McCain, “Fight, Fight, Fight”.

Posted by: Danny | September 10, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

I heard the comment, I know what Obama ai and I am appaled. Obama’s statement is typical of the mind set of the DNC today. Obama’s statementt reflects why we we were deprived of the opportunity to have a qualified experienced Democratic candidate on the ballot this year. Obama’s statement is the reason so many of us are crossing party lines to elect a Republican. I believe it will be easier to convince republicans to be moderate and adjust their positions on womens issues than it will to tone down Democrats that use womwn and really don’t want change.

Posted by: Maryoll | September 10, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am

I heard the comment, I know what Obama ai and I am appaled. Obama’s statement is typical of the mind set of the DNC today. Obama’s statementt reflects why we we were deprived of the opportunity to have a qualified experienced Democratic candidate on the ballot this year. Obama’s statement is the reason so many of us are crossing party lines to elect a Republican. I believe it will be easier to convince republicans to be moderate and adjust their positions on womens issues than it will to tone down Democrats that use womwn and really don’t want change.

Posted by: Marysol | September 10, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am

Give me a break! This is a classic repiblican/Rove move in turning the media spineless so they are afraid to challenge McCain/Palin on anything. Americans never cease to amaze me as an immigrant how they can be so naive and led astray. Yes I said it! Americans are dumb when it comes to politics. I can’t vote, so I just sit back and laugh at the citizens of this country go round and round. American’s should be less worried about lipstick and more worried about the issues. Now, from an outside perspective, it’s clear that if Americans want more war and an economy that protects big corporations, religious fundamentalism mixed with government, then they want McCain/Palin. If they want to turn to diplomacy instead of war, an economy that sustains everyone, and a return to the country I heard of and dreamed of with prosperity and good moral ground.. than you’ll choose Obama/Biden. For the last eight years we’ve had endless wars, a poor economy, and gross violations of our freedom brought on by republican. I honestly have no biass or agenda, I just see what I see from the outside looking in. I hope you make the right choice and aren’t fooled. I’m faced with a decision to leave this once prosperous country of hope and equality to settle for my own country in which has it’s own problems that I thought I could escape. I guess not…so good luck Americans…an for the world’s sake, I wish you well.

Posted by: Isaiah Arsenault | September 10, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am

Carping, whining conservatives. “Putting lipstick on a pig” is a common phrase used by many, generally in reference to someone who may be trying to make something or someone look appealing or attractive when it quite clearly will not work, or will only deceive the dumbest of people. No apology necessary.

Posted by: plantain11 | September 10, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am

MCCAIN/PALIN – THE BRIDGE TO NOWHERE
I kind of like that motto.

Posted by: rzan1 | September 10, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am

Nonsense Jake.
It was quite clear (through context and delivery) what each candidate was trying to communicate.
McCain was being critical of Hillary’s plan. Obama was trying to diminish Palin.
The audience in each case got the message — as will anyone who looks at the videos.
It is really sad to see how the media is trying to cover for Obama. I wonder what George Allen is thinking now…
Mike

Posted by: Mike | September 10, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

Here’s a saying…. “Stupid is as stupid does!!” So since Mccain has voted with Bush over 90% of the time, I guess that means that he is as stupid as Bush. I believe that on election day, all the pundits, broadcasters and opinion gives will be surprised at just how handidly Obama wins this election. Just like a new baby, the novelty eventually wears off, and like a new baby, Palin’s novelty will wear off. Let’s try to stick to the issues.. You know what they are….. The horrible economy, the stupid-unjust-war in Iraq, education, Inflation, and the fact that this country is well on its way to going to hell in a handbasket((another saying)) .. Who wants to judge me and accuse me of being something I am not because I have used a saying.. Does the fact that this country is going to hell in a handbasket make me unpatriotic?? NOPE.. Just a saying.. The reasons sayings exsist is because there is some truth in them, otherwise they wouldn’t be sayings!!!

Posted by: VABEAChmomof5 | September 10, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

Simple really. If one wants the Bush legacy to continue, then vote Palin & McCain. If one does not want the Bush legacy to continue, then vote Obama & Biden. The question for each of us to personally answer is “am I better off today than 8 years ago”.

Posted by: Lawrence | September 10, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

He may of meant it in a non offensive way but the truth is a lot of women may not take it that way. Especially since her referring to herself a pit-bull in lipstick only a couple days ago, too close for comfort. Obama has to realize that at this moment women are a little sensitive after the Hillary debacle so attacking Palin is not a wise choice. They have been attacking her and their numbers are going in the wrong direction, up.

Posted by: JB | September 10, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am

How Dare McCain want an applogy over truth when Palin and him are lying on every compain stump location about everything that comes out of their friggin mouths. They cannot even stop lying about the Airplane sold on ebay crap!! If I were Obama I would tell them “BITE ME”!!

Posted by: KCblogger | September 10, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am

staniam
State 3 important issues PALIN/mccain are talking about with any amount of detail and show us where we can verify this.
ENOUGH!!!!!

Posted by: Gregan | September 10, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am

The only pigs are Rick Davis who I would like to meet in a for a healthy discussion about respect and John McCain who resembles a pig everytime he talks and squeals

Posted by: Dan A | September 10, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am

Obama dont gotta worry when he call a pig a pig. he just be telling it like it is. This woman dont think about how it be thinking about black votes. It our turn and aint no white woman gonna stop it. Besides ABC saying today that most of the world want Obama if things is gonna get better.

Posted by: Nadine | September 10, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am

He said what? Calling a women a pig is not a good move and will not endear him to women. If he called her a pig then I’m not voting for him. And I know a lot of other women who will feel the same.

Posted by: Jill | September 10, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

The Reps messed up during 8 years!!!!!!
what makes people think that they will do better ?
i thought the war in Iraq was because of WMD, now apparently the surge is working and victory is in sight!!!.Did they FINALLY find these WMD?
if not why did the surge work for?i mean , what are the troops doing there EXACTLY?

Posted by: Avembe | September 10, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am

so are these the big issues, ABC? What a useless network?

Posted by: Goerge Bush III | September 10, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am

He who lives in a glass house . . . . Mr. Tapper, as a member of the establishment media that is engaged in a very dishonest, all-out propaganda campaign for Obama, I wouldn’t think you’d have the audacity to even mention putting “lipstick on a pig.”

Posted by: Stephen C. Coen | September 10, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

NO way

Posted by: indp voter | September 10, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Justin,
The last thing Obama needs to do is “shut the hell up”. The Democrats have tried that before. And lost. The more he’s tried to stay to stay on message, the more Mccain has risen in the polls. The Republicans got one thing right “this election will not be about issues”. They basically called voters stupid, and have proven to be right. The one thing he, and Biden need to do is stop praising Palin. Shae has nothing good to say about either one. All they is legitimize her nomination. Which is nothing but Reublican smoke, and mirrors.

Posted by: Randy | September 10, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Well, here goes the Republicans again. A truth squad that tell lies, sound like swiftboaters in a brand new package. I really think Bush was and is a skilled politician. I think McCain is too. And that he has done good deeds in his time in Washington. But these lies really shows that the core of the campaign is rotten. And you know the saying – it only takes one rotten apple to spoil the crop. I guess it is even more true when you have whole basket of apples…

Posted by: Erik | September 10, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

What a MAJOR gaffe! Can you imagine if McCain or Palin made a similar veiled comment about Obama that involved an animal?! Holy @#$%!

Posted by: bct424 | September 10, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Is English the first language in America?If the answer is yes,then you all need to get your heads examined for carrying on this stupid debate about “pigs” and “lipstick”.

Posted by: Achiri | September 10, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

Ms Palin needs a Truth Squad….good luck finding a glimmer of truth that comes outta her mouth.

Posted by: Trish | September 10, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

Truth Squad? LOLOL more like a “HIT SQUAD” they have not stopped lying about Obama since the pig came out of the slop house.

Posted by: KCblogger | September 10, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am

Truth Squad? LOLOL more like a “HIT SQUAD” they have not stopped lying about Obama since the pig came out of the slop house.

Posted by: KCblogger | September 10, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am

Obama knows he’s on sinking sand. This race is over.

Posted by: Clint | September 10, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

WAKE UP. If anything, Obama should apologize to Wailin’ Palin for referring to her as a lipstick. Obviously, the campaign’s the PIG.

Posted by: JSL | September 10, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Jill,
How about first reading the article? Then making a judgement. If you read the article, and how the term has been used before by McCain himself in reference to Hillary, you won’t have to wonder IF he called her a pig. Or is people telling you he called her a pig good enough for you? Is McCain using the term all right with you, but Obama using it all wrong?

Posted by: Randy | September 10, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Since Senator Obama seems to be able to make such good use of words and to turn a phrase, be it an idiom or a metaphor, into a weapon of sarcasm directed a his opponents, perhaps THEY could use a few words to use when referring to him. I suggest two: popinjay and cockalorum.
Turnabout is fair play, but, frankly, I believe Senator Obama’s opponents have too much class to use either word on him.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 10, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

OBAMA DOES NOT HAVE TO APOLOGIZE. HE CAN LOSE THE ELECTION. HE IS A JERK AND SHOULD NOT EVEN BE RUNNING. HE HAS NO CLASS. HE IS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER OF DRUG AND GANGS AND GUNS IN THE JUNGLES OF SOUTH CHICAGO.
TYPICAL LOW CLASS CHICAGO CORRUPTION. THEY OUGHT TO SHIP HIM BACK TO KENYA. HE CAN LIVE WITH HIS BROTHER GEORGE ON A DOLLAR A MONTH.
THE ONLY PIG AROUND HERE IS A MALE CHAUVINIST PIG. PUT LIPSTICK ON BARACK.

Posted by: DemocratNoMore2 | September 10, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

It’s okay for McCain to use it describing Hillary’s healthcare plan, but it’s not okay for Obama to use the expression to describe McCain/Palin’s false attempt to co-opt his theme of change? WHAT RANK HYPOCRISY! Why is this sham even being tolerated by the American public and news organizations? There truly seems to be no level of dishonesty that McCain’s people will not stoop to. If it doesn’t come back on him, the American public is ignorant and deserves four more years of Bush/Cheney.

Posted by: jon in maryland | September 10, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

Reading the above is at times like reading a script of a kindergarden argument. I know politicians have to do what they can to boulster vulnerable election campaigns; but this is verging on rediculous.
I suggest the Palin Truth Squad start arguing the toss on real issues; rather than focussing on pathetic childish scraps over who said what.

Posted by: ferventand | September 10, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

Obama said this in between the thousands of times he says…”ummm:” “err” “ummmm” ummm while his little monky brain is trying to think of more lies just like his lying preacher and his lying associates.

Posted by: Observer | September 10, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

Stephen C Cohen,
Have you ever heard of a little show called Fox News? Saying you’re “fair, and balanced” doesn’t actually make it so.

Posted by: Randy | September 10, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

“Truth Squad”????? more like a “HIT SQUAD” They have not stop lying about Obama ever since the PIG had come out of the SLOP HOUSE!!!

Posted by: KCblogger | September 10, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

“Sweetie”, “Pig”, “Fish”. These are words coming out of Obama’s mouth. WOMEN OF AMERICAN, DUMP THIS SEXIST!!!

Posted by: ablanche08 | September 10, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

The discrimination of any sort is never in the ears or hearts of the speaker but of the listener….all of us. Poor, Obama. He suffers from opening his mouth exchanging feet. Now every woman in America is a pig with lip stick because they use lipstick. Is that in the Koran somewhere?

Posted by: Maxify55 | September 10, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Anyone can make a mistake and I hate the ‘gotcha’ moment. But in this case I think it’s worse if Obama did mistakenly say this because what a dunce – can’t he think before he opens his mouth? It’s not like a month or so has passed since Palin’s comment, and it’s not like he didn’t hear the snickers of the Obama zombies when he said it. If he knew, he’s just the typical sexist (oh now what did happen to your promise of running a new type of campaign, sir? Hmmmm???) but if he said it in error, I think it’s worse – one in this position has to think before saying things (and thinking is a prerequisite to being a president). What if this had been a diplomatic event and Obama said something this incendiary to a foreign power?

Posted by: Barbara | September 10, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

I think campaigns should be heavily fined (to the point where it puts a dent in their war chest) for telling lies. I also think that every point in an ad or prepared statement must be factually accurate and have a legal oath applied. This would get rid of the bs in this election. I want to hear about the issues from the candidates. If you want to hide and avoid the public then get a replacement. I want answers and I want them now!

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

The crowd knew that Obama was referencing Palin, but the media is in full denial today. The liberal bias has never been more apparent. Jake Tapper is really in Palin-Derangement Syndrome. He can’t stand Palin, and he is in full defensive mode for Obama.

Posted by: Karen | September 10, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am

OBAMA IS GOOD WITH WORDS HE TOOK LESSONS FROM HIS PREACHER, YOU KNOW THE ONE WHO HE DOESN’T GO TO NOW THAT HE IS RUNNING FOR PRESEDENT. A DOG WILL RETURN TO HIS VOMIT.

Posted by: dsmith | September 10, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

oh the fake outrage. If I was Obama I would keep repeating the line. This fake outrage after the horried lie McCain told about Obama wanting to teach sex ed to kids. Let me say it Mccain and Plain are lying pigs

Posted by: paul | September 10, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Actually, I do believe he was talking about the McLame policies and “plans (a/k/a jokes)” but, IF THE SHOE FITS, WEAR IT! Absolutely the right thing to say. As for Pa[l]in, She wanted in this game. If she can’t take the heat get out of the kitchen and, in her case, the apron. She has been more sequested and protected than any other VP or P candidate EVER. These people are jokes and if you vote for them (especially female voters) you are destroying this country and the rights of all women who absolutely do not share her beliefs. Any that do share those with her, leave the country! I despise these people – anyone WITH A BRAIN would. The Hillary supporters who say they will switch to this joke of a ticket aren’t really on Hillary’s side. Nothing this female person does or says is anything like Hillary’s policies and plans.

Posted by: Sharon | September 10, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

Ablanche,
Get a grip. he called his daughter sweetie during the democratic convention was he being sexist then? McCain opposed the equal pay bill, which would ensured that women make the same as men. Is that sexist?

Posted by: Randy | September 10, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

What a way to get away from the REAL issues. I live in the South and I have heard this expression over and over again. It’s stupid that poor Ms.Palin got her little feelings hurt over an expression that people have been using for years. Now John and Palin wants him to say “sorry” for what? She knew what she was getting into when she agreed to be John’s VP pick. There’s another old saying, if you can’t take the heat stay out of the kitchen. Now can we please get back to the real issues?

Posted by: Love | September 10, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

Why is reps. damn hypocates. i hate that. if the win this e;ection its beause of lies and lies and lies and lies .God have mercy. Maccain used teh same express against My beloved Hill, Mccain got to pardon Hill.Its that stupid when Palin somehow used the same expression.

Posted by: krist | September 10, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

George Stephanopolus says questioning Obama’s “community organizer” time is code for racist talk. Gee, hello, anyone home at ABC NEWS? Are they so disgustingly in the tank that they don’t get it? The crowd got it, Obama realized it was stupid and hesitated, but Jake Tapper is really mad anyone would dare question his candidate, Obama.

Posted by: Karen | September 10, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Once again, the conversation centers on personalities and words and images. Nothing to do with issues. It’s the republican playbook from 2000 and 2004. Time for Hillary to start using the same tactics against Pailn.

Posted by: drogers | September 10, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Is the Pig with Lipstick offended? Welcome to politics. Someone order the pig a new backbone.

Posted by: KCblogger | September 10, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

Another pathetic atempt by the Republicans to distract public opinion from the real issue: they don’t offer anything but more of the same. McCain is an old man from old Washington and old ideas, Palin is a new face to old ideas that have been proven dangerous and wrong for 8 years. Do you really want more of the same? Your grandsons are the ones who will be paying (literally) another 4 years of mistaken policies. No more McSame/Bush/Cheney/Palina. OBAMA/BIDEN’08

Posted by: xav987 | September 10, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

When I heard the Obama’s statement “You can put lipstick on a PIG and its still a PIG.” I felt he was talking about Palin. Biden made a similar statement but mentioned Palin by name. Obama’s camp said Obama was talking about McCain not Palin. It dos not matter if Obama was talking about McCain or Palin. It is unacceptable for him to call either one of them a PIG.

Posted by: Quincy | September 10, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

We are surprised that this is becoming a point of debate. Is not a pig better than Palin, because a pig will not exploit the misfortunes of its children for political gains? Let us talk about issues which are important for American people and that is what we are not hearing from McPalin. God save America from McSame.

Posted by: BKMC | September 10, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

If you think it was meant for her then just think that. If he loses your vote so be it. If he loses the election then so be it. I would rather that he maintain the high road and not apologize for every little complaint from the opposing campaign. In my mind Obama has already done a great thing for this country. He exposed the racism, even within his party, that so many Americans think we have made so much progress with. If you can stand the truth – we clearly have not. I also thank him for waking up the millions of people who have ignored the political process. That’s success. Don’t just deny not being a Bush 3rd term, prove it to the voters by showing us the CHANGE policies that will replace those of the past 8 years.

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

McCain/Palin are the most vicious, mean spirited campaign ever run. And talk about double standard. They disgust me. they aer NOT for you if you’re not big oil or the very very wealthy people. Get real.

Posted by: lp | September 10, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

God forbid anyone should actually pay attention to the truth! Obama wasn’t speaking about Palin at all. But the McCain campaign has to distract voters from little things like two wars, the economic, housing, enviromental and healthcare crises that this country faces. So they came up with this ridiculous stunt. I am ashamed to see that some Americans believe it without even checking the facts. This isn’t 1908. It’s not hard to find out the truth!

Posted by: Ann | September 10, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

Of course the lipstick-pig comment was a dig on Palin, Sen. Obama’s speeches are not words that just pop into mind. Tell me his advisors didn’t consider the comment would irritate the McCain/Palin camp.

Posted by: FRAN | September 10, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

Some of you just keeping complaining about President Bush. Look who is controlling the Congress? What is their rating? much lower than President Bush…Congress is the one to blame. We do not need a Full House in the Government. Pelosi and Reid are liars….unfortunately I am a Democrat.
Democrat for McCain/Palin

Posted by: TMartinNg | September 10, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

DemocratNoMore2 – Bye Bye!

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

Don’t you people realize that when Obama said he wanted to make changes in Washington D.C. that also means to change to way the race to the White House is done. He is trying to be the better person and stop the mude slinging and talk about the facts and what he or the other candidate will do as President. That is what we should betalking and thinking about. Not this crap and out and out lies the Republicans put out. I am an American living in Ireland and if McCain wins I will be happy not to be living in the good old USA

Posted by: Jeanne Mercer | September 10, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Sarah Palin brought this on herself when she referred to herself as a
“pit-bull with lipstick” Now, it’s a big issue with her, when it means absolutely nothing pertaining to what they should be campaigning on. These Republicans will change the subject for any reason, so they don’t have to discuss the real important issues and concerns of the American people. Proving that nothing will change if they are elected, and we’ll have to all suffer with another four years of NO CHANGE.

Posted by: jms55 | September 10, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am

Here is another bit of concise “wisdom” for Senator Obama, our current, greatest, self-appointed agent of change, to consider. He might consider how he could direct it at all the Washington “insiders”, which I believe includes all Congressional members and Administration members, but they might become very annoyed with him. The saying, also involves the word “pig”, which Senator Obama recently seems to be fond of. So, without further ado, here it is: “Never try to teach a pig to sing … it wastes your time and annoys the pig.”
In using this gem and applying it to the whole U.S. Government, I am certain Senator Obama could accomplish wonders, although I don’t recommend its use by his minions.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 10, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am

Can we PLEASE get back to the REAL issues? I think the economy, health care, the war and education far out weigh “lipstick” gate. The fact that this was the top story on GMA speaks volumes.

Posted by: Love | September 10, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am

Where is Biden? He is the one that should be attacking Palin not Obama? He needs to get on this job. Obama needs to look presidential for the next 56 days in order to win. I heard Obama may drop Biden from the ticket and replace him with Hillary. Obama needs to make Biden do his job.

Posted by: Linda | September 10, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am

Obama never talks about the issues. I have never heard him ever not once talk about a SOLUTION to Americas problems. Obama has no solutions. He spends his time slime attacking Palin. He has nothing else to talk about. He has no ideas for America. He never has and never will have. He took his answers mostly stolen from Hillary.

Posted by: Women United against Obama | September 10, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Oh, c’mon – Caribou Barbie can take it. Isn’t she supposed to be the roughest, toughest gal on the GOP block?
How is it that people actually don’t realize what’s going on here. Palin’s the attack dog because she can hide behind the old “sexism” mantra whenever Obama or Biden strike back (which they should do every time she opens her mouth).
As a woman, I find this tactic so insulting that each and every time I see Obama or Biden call her out on her lies and inexperience, I’m going to send their campaigns another $50 donation.
Palin and her extreme views and archaic beliefs are a disgrace to our gender – thank God women everywhere are stepping up to denounce her for the fraud she is.

Posted by: A2 | September 10, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Same old story…Obama could shoot someone and it would be excused. Don’t say anything that might be termed as inappropriate about him, but he can say anything. Settle down, you whining Dems; he’ll win because the media won’t let him lose. I have said all along that this election was just a sham. They shoved Hillary out of the way and now it’s McCain’s turn to go down. I don’t know why we bother voting. This is more like the United Socialist States of America and we are going to put in our first dictator.

Posted by: KC+1971 | September 10, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Stay on the ATTACK Dems., STAY ON THE ATTACK !!!!!!
The repubs THOUGHT that they could use palin as the attack dog, and then HIDE behind the charge of feminism when anyone responded to her……
WELL, YOU CAN FORGET THAT !!!!!!
The repubs HATE being on defense and just want to HIDE behind palin.
ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK ATTACK

Posted by: Order | September 10, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Ah today’s vast right wing conspiracy!

Posted by: Mike | September 10, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

It is the Truth A pig is an pig. Why is the Rep.Party always finger-pointing and nick picking. Every day it is something dumb. He’s not Black, hes not Christian. When will this madness stop. Because it will not affect my vote.

Posted by: Misglo | September 10, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

One side says something and it’s fair debate. The other says it, and it is an attack. Come on. This is a nasty, polarizing campaign full of lies. It will do nothing but divide the country.

Posted by: Joe Barone | September 10, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

since when is a pig inherently a girl anyways? Does that mean he also called McCain and Plain fishes?
McCain’s campaign doesnt THINK. it just reacts. they have an ad out now about this, one massive waste of time.
they are overplaying their hand, big time, with this sexist crap. Imagine if Obama called every attack against him racist. He’d be over before you can say “Al Sharpton”

Posted by: Goon | September 10, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am

Love: Can we PLEASE get back to the REAL issues?
I second that! The real issues get covered in this muck. The press has become reporters of blogs and rumors setting up fury among supersensative supporters when they post this stuff. It is sort of like two old biddies with nothing more to do than gossip and gossip, as we all know, does nothing but hurt people.

Posted by: david | September 10, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am

As a mayor and a governor, Palin sure went after the federal earmarks like a pig.

Posted by: fwrinn | September 10, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Way to go, stupid BO! You are succeeding in turning every bright, intelligent woman in America against you—as if most weren’t already wise to your empty head/empty suit.

Posted by: anotherwomanagainstBO | September 10, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Obama is RATTLED! His comment regarding “My Muslim faith” on Sunday, coupled with his “pig/lipstick” comment on Tuesday suggests that he is off message; a little scared; and is rattled over Palin. He is driving women to McCain, and they are making their minds up! On November 5, Team Obama will have to face the reality of making one fundamental BAD DECISION: the selection of Joe Biden over Hillary Clinton! Obama LOST his banner of change when he picked a senator who has been in Washington just about as long as Obama has been on earth. When he made that decision, his banner of ‘Change You Can Believe In’ flew out the window! All of a sudden, their tag used against McCain — “More of the Same” — became applicable to Obama – Biden. Obama will regret not selecting Hillary! (Think that he already does!!)

Posted by: jwatl | September 10, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

No, Obama does NOT have to apologize. McCain himself has used the expression in the past, so what makes it ok then? Don’t you dare back down Obama!!!

Posted by: Bajovane | September 10, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Where is the apology from Meghan McCain for her comment that “no one knows what war is like other than my family”? My dad was at D-Day and the southern invasion of France, my uncle, a Navy pilot, was in 3 wars (that’s 2 more than McCain) World War II, Korea, & Vietnam, including a POW in WWII, another uncle was in the Aleutian Campaign during WW II (most Americans don’t even KNOW what that is), my great-uncle was in the Great War in France, wounded, gassed, and had flashbacks all his life. My husband was in Vietnam and still has nightmares. The Iraq War has brought back memories that he is just now telling me and we’ve been married 34 years! My nephew is on his 2nd deployment to Iraq. BUT ONLY the McCains, only the McCains know war. I’ll tell my uncle when I visit his grave at Arlington National Cemetery. Grow a backbone, Sarah. You are shaming women.

Posted by: Dali | September 10, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

What the difference between Sarah Palin and George Bush?…….you got it…..the Lipstick!

Posted by: prohb | September 10, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Obama turned Bill Clinton’s comments that Obama’s record of voting against the Iraq war was a ‘fairy tail’ into a smear that President Clinton said a black man becoming president was a fairy tail. Obama can’t then go around talking about lipstick and pigs and not expect it to be seen as calling Gov. Palin a pig.
What goes around comes around.

Posted by: J.P. | September 10, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

It’s now official. Here’s all you need to know to decide your vote in November: If Sarah Palin — a so-called “soccer mom with no experience to even be VP” (as the Democrats like to say) — has Obama THIS shaken and rattled and out making obviously stupid, sexist comments…
…Then how do you REALLY think he’s going to handle himself when he has to face a fanatical leader in Iran defying the UN to build a nuclear bomb or anything actually serious like that?
McCain/Palin — clearly the only SANE choice.

Posted by: Guardian Angel | September 10, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Hilarious, saying you can put lipstick on a pig and it’s still a pig! What was hilarious was the sweeties in the background applauding (then probably checking their lipstick)! Wonder how much they got paid for the stand up comedy. This election just gets funnier and funnier, I’ll give Obama that.

Posted by: Gary | September 10, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

I think Palin should apologise to herself from calling herself a pittbull with lipstick.

Posted by: h2o | September 10, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

ISSUES PEOPLE ISSUES.

Posted by: community organizer | September 10, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Here’s the problem with the republican party, and Karl Rove’s strategic pick in Palin, they are going to cry foul over everything now because they can. The lipstick on a pig thing is an old saying, are they THAT stupid? No. They’re going to use Palin’s sex to their advantage. Cheap, low tactics. despicable republicans.

Posted by: Jim | September 10, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

The adages about pigs are indeed old and common. But coming on the heels of Palin’s comment about pit bulls and lipstick, it is obviously slanted at her. Mr Tapper even mentioned this in his article, then promptly ignored it.
What cowardly hypocrisy on the part of BO and JT!

Posted by: Rick | September 10, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Obama must remember he can not handle Palin the same way as he did Hillary. Palin is not part of the DNC but GOP and the GOP are not going to allow him to say and do whatever, like the DNC did.

Posted by: suzy | September 10, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

I agree with H2O. She definately called herself a dog. HAHA

Posted by: Mike | September 10, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

A consideration: our individual and collective outrage about what’s going on in our lives is ignited whenever anything is said or done that offends us.
Often, though, such strong reactions are historically rooted, and because we have yet to become aware of that unresolved aspect of ourselves, we project it on anything that remotely strikes us.
With such strong reactions, polarizing comments, venemous rage expressed here and so many other venues, it might be helpful to recall Gandhi’s wise offer: “be the change you wish to see in the world.”

Posted by: Peter | September 10, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

You are so in the tank for Obama. How could any unbiased person not see the exactly what he was doing. You know that if McCain said you used a saying like call a spade a spade you would noy be making excuses for him. Did you get help from Sen. Obama’s camp for this story or do you make up this bs all by yourself?

Posted by: Ed | September 10, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am

Give me a break!!! Obama does not owe anyone a apology. Until this article, I did not even make the correlation. Who the hel* comes up with these things? What I got out of it is, “if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, usually, it is a duck.” Grow the hell up people. Again, the issues????

Posted by: Debbie | September 10, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Given the way Obama treated Hillary throughout the primaries, and now his demeaning statements towards Gov Palin, just makes you wonder how long he has been a sexist male?? Single handedly, OBAMA obtained thousands of female votes for McCain-Palin on September 9 with his demeaning ‘lipstick-pig’ comment. Someone needs to explain to that young man that bias and prejudice is a two way street!

Posted by: jwatl | September 10, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Again, Palin is being attacked by the democrats for her gender or for personal reasons but no one can attack her credentials so they call her a pig or go after her minor children to attack. And the fact taht Obama feels the need to spend his time campaigning making stabs at Palin is hilarious to me. He’s a presidential candidate who sounds like a fifth grader trying to pick on the little guy…in this case the Vice Presidential pick instead of the man running for president. They are so scared of the GOP ticket now that is all they do, start throwing low blows…just like the bully on the playground becuase it’s the only way he can feel superior. He’s behind in the polls and losing his grip. His celebrityism is wearing off and his talking in circles and saying a whole lot of nothing is starting to be heard…that he is saying a lot but it’s a lot of nothing. People are starting to see that…he doesn’t have the answers and he isn’t going to do anything but get us in a bigger mess then we are already in.

Posted by: R | September 10, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

As always, the righies want it both ways. They want to be able to personally insult the Dem candidate, call his wife a militant, blah, blah, blah, but when the dem candidate uses a term that’s probably been around since the middle ages the righties think he’s lobbing insults at their golden girl because she wears lipstick too. It just proves that Palen is no more than the righties token so they can horn in on the “sexism” argument whenever it pleases their little fancy. It’s becoming more and more and more obvious that Palen is no more than the GOP attempt at harvesting the low hanging fruit of the PUMAs, and the ability to portray dems as attacking the all American mom, as well as being able to scream sexism whenever they desire.
You people are a joke and your party has proven over the last 8 years. Step aside for the people that really do put “country first”.

Posted by: landlocked | September 10, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

This is so juvenile. Of course he wasn’t calling Palin a pig or McCain a fish (?!) Those are common figures of speech used to convey a larger meaning. They aren’t to be taken literally, or personally.
What’s scary is all the people who are STUPID enough to fall for this distraction from the real issues, and RACIST enough not to do what is right for this country.

Posted by: lizzy | September 10, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

This is classic Karl Rove-style politics. McCain has obviously given his campaign managers open-ended authority to do whatever it takes to win. They will say or do anything now that will throw Obama off kilter and keep both campaigns off the issues. When any issue-related speech is given by Obama, the McCain team will parse some comment or make up something or spin something. It keeps the morning news chatter churning out a lot about nothing. Why? McCain is using his brand as a maverick to win, one who bucks the system and his own party. The only problem is that his Palin pick sends his campaign sharply to the right. So, he really can’t mention the issues upon which he displayed his maverick side in a moderate, bi-partisan way-i.e. immigration, campaign finance, earmarking, stem cell research, etc. because his positions and efforts on those issues are the polar opposite of what the conservative base-”the right”- believe and the Republican party platform states. So who is he deceiving? The conservatives and his party leadership or the American people? Which McCain wants to govern and on whose issues-the conservatives or the moderates? I did have respect for McCain, but I don’t know who he is anymore.

Posted by: AWCG | September 10, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Dont back down… The comment was fair. Mccain used it against Hillary. If Palin can throw a few, she can take a few. What happens when the president of Iran calls her a pig?

Posted by: Smithington01 | September 10, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

Let’s see. We just bailed out Fannie and Freddie. Lehman Brothers is on the verge of collapsing. We have the highest rate of inflation in 27 years, the highest unemployment in five years, the highest deficit in history. We have people losing jobs, pensions, homes, health care and the opportunity to send their children for higher education. And ABC, all the media and the John McCain want to talk about both sides using the phrase, “lipstick on a pig.” Seventy percent of the media stories are about Sarah Palin. I wonder why? Are we trying to avoid the real issues?

Posted by: JAB | September 10, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

in his brush off comment , his middle finger comment and such. Just what you need a leader who makes snide remarks. Sure makes it easy for a foreign leader to trust him in negotiations. no Joebama

Posted by: signals | September 10, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

For Right wing conspiracies and more of the same vote McPalin ’08

Posted by: Mike | September 10, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

I AM CONCERNED CITIZEN AND STILL OUTRAGED THAT NONE OF YOU ARE REPORTING THE STORY ABOUT HOW JOHN MCCAIN IS KEEPING THIS WOMAN AWAY FROM THE PRESS .
IT IS NOT ABOUT NEWSCASTERS BEING RUDE…..POLITICAL PUNDITS GIGGLING…..IT IS ABOUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMANDING TO SEE HER IN FRONT CAMERAS IN UNSCRIPTED MOMENTS JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE.
I READ THE BLOGS AND YOU GUYS ARE SUPRESSING THE OUTRAGE…….
WE HAVE 56 DAYS UNTIL THE ELECION ARE YOU KIDDING ME……
PLUS THE OTHER STORY IS THAT JOHN MCCAIN PICKED SOMEONE FOR POLITCAL REASONS AND THREW THE COUNTRY UNDER THE BUS
HE WAS NOT THINKING ABOUT OUR NATIONAL SECURITY TO PICK SOMEONE WHO WAS CLEARLY NOT VETTED AND NEEDS TO BE “PREPARED” FOR PRESS
THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A FREE COUNTRY……..

Posted by: darren | September 10, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

The best thing Obama can do now, is if he is asked “are you going to offer an apology?”, he should flatly say “no”. If he is pressed he should give a blunt comment about the deliberate misinterpretation of his comments, condemn the practice, and say “next question”. That’s all the response that this petulant republican argument deserves.

Posted by: landlocked | September 10, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

Wow! I thought Obama was above this kind of “mud slinging”. I guess he’s just the same.

Posted by: LongT | September 10, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Wow! I thought Obama was above this kind of “mud slinging”. I guess he’s just the same.

Posted by: LongT | September 10, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

She’s not a pig. She’s a liar.

Posted by: Nora Lynch | September 10, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

It’s obvious that Oblahblah has never been to some well-needed therapy. He has more freudian slips than I have ever seen. Take that teleprompter away and he is very dangerous to his own campaign. Just the clumsy way he handled that “pig” line — I though you guys told me he was intelligent. I still haven’t seen the intelligent side of him.

Posted by: dazey | September 10, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

I am a woman, and Palin started all this lipstick stupidity, so Obama has the right to hit back. Since Hillary is missing in action he has to do it. You have to hit back, these Republicans all they know is play dirty when they have nothing to say. All Palin is a puppet for McCaon, no brains and he is behind her pulling the strings. DUH!!!

Posted by: yoli | September 10, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Lipstick on a Pig. What a classic comeback. It’s funny how the McCain camp is trying to play the gender card and get all in a puff. Kind of hard for the GOP to be upset about this when McCain himself has used the phrase “lipstick on a pig” a number of times. But hypocrisy is what we have come to expect from the GOP and the McCain/Bush campaign.

Posted by: arron | September 10, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Please. Not a single one of you people in here are that stupid to really believe that comment was towards Palin. You are all just pandering for McPalin. Not it off. Why don’t you tell me 3 things McCain will actually change in the White House instead.

Posted by: Mike | September 10, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

The republicans’ comments on this board are so hypocritical that they fail to contain any evidence of rational thought and intelligence. I am saddened that this country appears to be 48% full of idiots.

Posted by: FlaJay | September 10, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

It’s so interesting watching the two candidates and their campaigns and the differences in how they behave…
This week, a Georgian Republican called Barrack and Michelle Obama “uppity.” When asked about this in his interview with Keith Olbermann, Obama smiled and changed the subject.
Furthermore, I suggest some of you actually read a whole article and the argument it puts forth before adding comments.

Posted by: Amused | September 10, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

ok Palin Question,
If Governor Sarah Palin is so grounded with the conception of life that she would not allow a women to choose an abortion …even when it come to rap or incest … then why does she support the Death penalty?
And I’m an independent so this is not a bias question
After all life is life …

Posted by: david | September 10, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

a cocky mom with a gun is like a …

Posted by: lu2 | September 10, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Let McCain apologize to Romney and Hillary for using the same term to them. Now we have a woman canidate and the McCain camp wants to USE her gender for votes by usuing the gender card. Carl Rove should be in prison instead of advising McCain. I guess Bush and McCain are alike.

Posted by: CW | September 10, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Clearly, America has lost its mind.

Posted by: Arnie | September 10, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

The Republicans obviously have no way to counter Obama on the issues if the best thing they can come up with are ways to twist Obamas phrases (that they themselves used) in order to make him appear sexist. Open your eyes America, the comments had NOTHING to do with Palin except for the fact she will not be bringing change to this country. Get over it. Stop reading the scripts and start talking about the issues.

Posted by: Drew | September 10, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

a pink pig with pink lipstick is like a pittbull witout lipstick.

Posted by: wartowar | September 10, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Can you people not read?? Lipstick on a pig is a common phrase and has not been used by just Obama!!
McCain himself has used it.
Hello!!

Posted by: U_R_Kidding | September 10, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Common saying. If she can throw a few, she should be able to take a few.
Beyond this, she belongs to a church that speaks in tongues? Why cannot we not hear from her about this? She also believes that Alaska is a refuge state at the end of times. When will she comment. I am not sure I am comfortable with a vice president that speaks in tongues.

Posted by: Smithington01 | September 10, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

OMG! FOR ONE I CANT BELIEVE THEY ARE LYING EVEN IN THERE “TRUTH” SQUAD, WELL YEAH I CAN BUT I ALSO CANT UNDERSTAND THE PEOPLE THAT BELEIVE IT, LIKE THE FIRST POSTER! RETARDED!

Posted by: TJ HUNTER | September 10, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

You can put lipstick on a Muslim and its still a Muislim

Posted by: Tom Beebe | September 10, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

The stupidity and hypocracy of republicans never ceases to amaze me….
BTW, it’s official. Rove is on McCain’s campaign. He admitted it yesterday.
Almost as good was Meggy McCain’s comment that nobody knows the pain that soldiers go through but her family.
HYPOCRITES!!!!

Posted by: landlocked | September 10, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

They are only saying this stuff because obama is black. I cant believe how racist people still are

Posted by: Mike | September 10, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

ok Palin Question,
If Governor Sarah Palin is so grounded with the conception of life that she would not allow a women to choose an abortion …even when it come to rap or incest … then why does she support the Death penalty?
And I’m an independent so this is not a bias question
After all life is life …Good question. I would also like to know since she talks pro-life why protected animals and animals in general dont fall under life. Wants the Polar Bear removed from the protected list and she likes to kill animals for sport, not food, not need, just for the fun of it.

Posted by: CW | September 10, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

UNEMPLOYMENT THROUGH THEE ROOF…but they want an apology?

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

Republicans are desperate, childish, lying hypocrites. This is nothing new. It’s typical. I probably wouldn’t recognize them if they acted any differently.

Posted by: TPIP | September 10, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

I myself am a woman and I do not think Obama is being sexist-heck, he was talking about POLICIES, and this is a commonly-used saying! It would be one thing if it was something HE coined, but he didn’t, and MCCAIN himself used it in reference to Hillary’s healthcare policies.
And did we see Hillary crying sexism and blasting McCain for being misogynistic?
Sarah Palin clearly shows she cannot take the heat if she doesn’t tell this “Truth Squad” herself not to nitpick. This woman is NOTHING compared to Hillary. Jane Swift seems to lack common sense. Palin is the only candidate who wears lipstick= Obama was insulting Palin.
PLEASE. Do these people who pick up a fuss over everything deserve to be President? Will they start a war over a “Sexist” remark by a head-of-state of another country?
Plus, I believe if anyone has a PROVEN RECORD of insulting women, it is John McCain- calling Chelsie Clinton ugly and a dog, anyone? I never supported the GOP to begin with because of their penchant for mudslinging, and now I am only becoming more disgusted with them.
Will your campaign please concentrate on attacking Obama/Biden’s policies instead? Now WHO’S playing victim? Even your campaign ads tell half-truths to outright lies. From the deafening silence on rebutting Obama’s policies, it seems that you are not able to attack his substance and instead have to resort to smoke screens and mudslinging.

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

“I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” Winston Churchill

Posted by: h2o | September 10, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

If Americans are not seeing through Mccain/Palin, they are getting what they deserve.
Sarah Palin is one scarey person. Her religious beliefs are far outside the mainstream. Her church believes in creating an army that will take over the United States and the world. God’s warriors. Look for yourself.

Posted by: Smithington01 | September 10, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated”
Mahatma Gandhi quotes

Posted by: h20 | September 10, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

These Republicans are such jerks, they would want an apology too from the Democrats for having to spend money on this election. The “lipstick on a pig” is an old saying that’s been around as long as McCain. They know exactly what it means, but they want to make it a an issue because of their beauty queen Palin can be used as a tool. Any woman that allows herself to be used and abused as a tool in today’s enlighten society deserves no respect. You want respect Palin, start by respecting yourself first, before demanding it. And this woman would dare say she represents America’s woman. Only in anatomy, but not in anything else. Her thinking is exactly what fuels repressive and ignorant attitudes against woman. You don’t stand front and center on this, you stand where tired old men think your place should be…that of a tool of their convienence. Shame on you, Palin.

Posted by: Jake | September 10, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

Look, let’s just call a spade a spade. Oh wait, did that come out wrong? Does that sound like I’m taking a cheap shot at Obama? (Big political crowd that supports me snickering and applauding in the background). You misunderstood me. I didn’t mean to imply anything bad (insert mock sincerity here). Really, I use that old saying all the time.
So take my word for it. Hey, I’m a politician. Would I lie to you? It was just an accident that I happened to use an old expression at a political rally that ALSO doubled as a razor sharp insult at my rival. I didn’t mean anything bad at all (fingers crossed behind my back).

Posted by: Obama is a Hypocrite | September 10, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

It seems that lately, every time Obama opens his mouth, it makes me realize more and more why we should not trust this man with the most powerful office in the world.
How do you think Obama and his supporters would have reacted if McCain used the common phrase, “Well isn’t that the pot calling the kettle black?” They would have been screaming that McCain is racist in every way.
I can only imagine the love the media would show to Obama in helping to spin that, too.

Posted by: ILOVEPIGS | September 10, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

and for a final quote “Don’t approach a goat from the front, a horse from the back, or a fool from any side.”

Posted by: h20 | September 10, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

If Sara can’t stand the head she needs to get out of the kitchen! This should not even be news because it clearly was not intended to be a sexist insult. The McCain campaign is desperately trying to avoid talking about the issues. Why is that? Because they have no ideas about how to move this country forward.

Posted by: Leslie | September 10, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

ok Palin Question,
If Governor Sarah Palin is so grounded with the conception of life that she would not allow a women to choose an abortion …even when it come to rap or incest … then why does she support the Death penalty?
And I’m an independent so this is not a bias question
After all life is life …Good question. I would also like to know since she talks pro-life why protected animals and animals in general dont fall under life. Wants the Polar Bear removed from the protected list and she likes to kill animals for sport, not food, not need, just for the fun of it.”
Good comment

Posted by: Mike | September 10, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Not only was the comment fair it’s was right. John McCain has a copy of Bush’s leadership and economic plan and we’re doomed if he wins. The only reason they want to keep this about Palin is to throw blame so they don’t have to talk about what they want for America. Smart people won’t fall for it. There’s no apology needed. In fact, when John McCain stands up to Karl Rove, I might actually think John McCain is for America. Sarah Palin should have been outraged that they asked to ‘use’ her knowing that the only reason they picked her was for her gender. Karl Rove has managed to split the country once again and is working hard to turn Americans into idiots so we can vote for McCain, the way we voted for Bush.
I’m donating to Obama campaign right now. This female believes that Repubulicans had their chance and screwed us over and over again. I say ENOUGH!

Posted by: Cindy | September 10, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

This is stupid. I am going to vote for McCain but Obama did nothing wrong with the lipstick on a pig statement. It is an old saying and he wanted to makes his point. We should be arguing the point not some silly statement people have used many times.

Posted by: Ted | September 10, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

LOL!!! He didn’t call Palin a pig, but it would’ve been funny if he had!!! I won’t vote for McCain/Bush – no way!!!!

Posted by: dattexas | September 10, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Look She is a pig.
It’s TIME Democrats called it how it is!
It’s War
BBQ that Monster before she devours the world.
GO OBAMA
WE LOVE YOU

Posted by: wednesday | September 10, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

So McCain uses the “lipstick on a pig” phrase, and then Obama has just used it in similar context. It is not an uncommon phrase. Seems to me that McCain owes Palin an apology–after all he apparently sees her as just a pig with lipstick and Obama’s remark must have helped him realize his deep-seated feelings about the woman. Now if Obama had said “lipstick on a pitbull,” then an apology would be warranted, given her acceptance speech at RNC. So McCain–apologize. If Palin is actually offended, she needs to grow up, and be quick about it. Bottom line, there are so many important issues that we need to be addressing if we want to be able to keep our homes and our jobs, get away from our dependence on foreign oil, and give our children a world that is at least as good as the world we are in now. So much to do!! Hard problems to solve!! Pig lipstick problem? Just something to get folks away from working on the real issues. Apologize, McCain, and get on with what is really important.

Posted by: Jan | September 10, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

If Sarah Palin needs a “truth squad” to baby-sit her and protect such a sensitive, fragile woman, then maybe she shouldn’t be a heartbeat away from the presidency. Maybe she should baby-sit her own kids and go back to being a hockey mom instead of this faux politician she claims to be.
Obama used a very common expression that has been used for decades. Palin and her supporters need to get over themselves, surprisingly, this election is not about her. It’s about Obama vs. McCain. She’s a flash in the pan that the press has latched on to…Just like Sanjaya from American Idol, in an out as fast as his hair styles changed!

Posted by: N.D. | September 10, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Yes it is a commonly used phrase but Obama meant it as a jab at Palin after she famously used that expression at the Republican convention. His audience at the time got the joke. It seems dishonest for anyone now to claim that is not what he meant. And Obama is paying for that jab with negative press coverage.
Hillary Clinton never would have made that mistake.

Posted by: Lupek68 | September 10, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

I remember a day when the world waved the American Flag-The day we landed on the moon. I remember a day when the world waved the American Flag–When the Berlin wall came down. Two great presidents and a world that respected us and looked up to us. Both times deplomacy was used. Matters of fact during the Cuban missle crisis, Kennedy’s Chief of staff and his four Generals all recommended invading Cuba. Kennedy didnt do what he was pressured to do but used his brain as a Commander in Chief should, and thank God he did. He didnt invade Cuba and the rest is history. Reagan also didnt fire a shot and used deplomacy. Obama says the same thing and the war should be the absolute last move. Two of the greatest presidents also took this path. Now does anyone acually believe that if McCains four Generals were recommending us to invade he would go against their wishes and use if brain and the power of deplomacy? I do not think so. We need someone intelligence in the White House. We used to be respected around the world. The world knew our military might and it went without saying. After 8 years of Bush the world not only looks down on us, but knows our military is spread so thin that we would be hard pressed if a national security or international emergancy came up. We need a new direction and a president that understands that deplomacy and international communication can keep us out of wars and earn the respect of the world. I want the world waving the American Flag again. Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: CW | September 10, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Maybe “pig with lipstick” is a common expression (I’ve lived in NY and IL and I’ve never heard it), but by using it so soon after Palin’s self-referential “pit bull with lipstick”, Obama isn’t fooling anybody about what he really meant. Certainly his real meaning was crystal clear to his audience. All of this explaining afterwards reminds me of a cat diggin around in its litter box, covering its own poop.
This is going to cost him. He has lost the “nice guy, gentleman” franchise.

Posted by: bobbiewick | September 10, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others. Republicans started the I am glad Obama is fighing back. For 18 months Obama has been thoroughly vetted, why not Palin for 18 days. A picture is emerging now that Palin as the mayor of Wasilla and Governor of Alaska,adopted the policies and tactics of the Taliban. Basically, she is violating the constitutional human rights of decent law abiding Americans by telling them it is my way or the highway and if you take the highway, I will attack you on the highway (Just like the Taliban). Palin fired a female librarian, who told Palin that she will uphold the standards laid down by the American library association. This is not what Palin wanted to hear and she fired her. Palin herself said that she is a pit bull with a lipstick and John McCain said that Hillary Clinton, s healthcare plan is similar to Obama’s plan and the only difference between them is one is pig with lipstick. So don’t get my sympathies because Obama is throwing punches. You are not a good boxer if you can only throw punches, you have to be able to take more of them if you have to prevail and that is why Ali was the greatest boxer. Interesting how history is being repeated. When Mondale selected Geraldine as his running mate the ratings went up and Mondale was leading but as soon as people realized and began to find out more about Geraldine, Walter Mondale’s tire was flat and the only state he won was his home state of Minnesota and the District of Columbia. On election day, worse case scenario for McCain, win in the state of Alaska. What we know about Palin so far is enough to swing back to the trusted and vetting ticket of Obama-Biden. As far as who will win this dead even fight as of today. I would say Que Sarah Sarah. Translation, whatever will be will be.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | September 10, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Thank goodness,the McCain camp showed their pettiness once again. My brother Allen was for McCain. Allen, finally yelled out “ENOUGH” when he heard the accusations about the lipstick/pig remark from the McCain camp. Allen now admits McCain doesn’t dealt with issues just raises distraction to avoid them.
My brother not only surprised us when
he jumped up and yelled out “Enough”,
he is voting Obama/Biden

Posted by: Dee | September 10, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Whether Obama meant really meant it or not is NOT the point.
The fact is that he had whipped up a storm of the same magnitude as the ones the Obama camp made up in the primaries on Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro. In earnest, did Bill and Geraldine meant harm ? … but it did cost Hillary the nomination.
So…I guess what goes around comes around.
OBAMA = race card, sexism card. CHANGE WE DO NOT WANT TO BELIEVE IN !!!

Posted by: McCain/Palin 2008 | September 10, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

The way this is going – America would be better served just having a YA MAMA joke standoff and calling it a day. Why talk about pertinent stuff.

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

“If a candidate shows how stupid he is calling his opponents names. Obama is an insecure, arrogant and prickly man who isn’t sure what to do when his party’s attempts to smear the opposition by name calling.”
So I guess it’s OK for YOU to call someone names, just not anyone else? Typical republican hypocricy. Frankly calling her a pig is insulting…..to pigs. But that did not happen. Republicans zeroed in on the word lipstick, since Palin compared herself to a dog using the same word. Then the spin machine kicked in. It so laughably predictable of them to do this. Holier-than-thou self-righteous indignation and faux outrage is simply ‘Wednesday’ to these people…..

Posted by: SearamblerOne | September 10, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Whether Obama really meant it or not is NOT the point.
The fact is that he has whipped up a storm of the same magnitude as the ones the Obama camp made up in the primaries on Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro. In earnest, did Bill and Geraldine meant harm ? … but it did cost Hillary the nomination.
So…I guess what goes around comes around.
OBAMA = race card, sexism card. CHANGE WE DO NOT WANT TO BELIEVE IN !!!

Posted by: McCain/Palin 2008 | September 10, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

The Iceberg will fix the Titanic. Isnt that what McCain is saying when he says he can fix Washington, since he helped break it.

Posted by: CW | September 10, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

McCain and Palin need to grow up. They like to sling the mud and accusations, yet cry and whine like children when they “think” that “someone called us a name” – wah wah wah. Is this who the white population is really looking up to?

Posted by: anon | September 10, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

if it oinks like a pig and is growing fat on the back of working class americans it is mcpain and more pain
lipstick definitely is not going to help this duo. wake up america we have been in the muck and mire of a pig farm for the last eight years, it is just a new brood of pigs who will benefit the big fat cat lobbyist. we need to clean up the sty and it is going to take more than lipstick

Posted by: marty | September 10, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Once again it’s Obama vs Palin in todays news cycle. David Axlrod is asleep at the wheel and headed towards the guardrail. “Stupid is as Stupid does”

Posted by: Jim | September 10, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Now I see McCain’s CHANGE. Every negative comment about his policies is an insult to Palin. That is the only change I have seen since he declared he was the candidate of change. Another example how politicans distort the truth and the public accepts it. Young adults reading this, remember: lying is acceptable even if it has to do with selecting the next president. Success comes with learning to lie effectively and is more important than truth.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | September 10, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

some of you people on here are just sickening. personally i am tired of hearing about sarah “pig” palin. tired of seeing her face and all that goes with it. i will be so glad when this election is over. palin or whatever is playing ball with the big boys then she needs to deal with playing with the big boys, and have some more speeches done since from the clips on gma she still speaking from her vp speech. i hope that when they have the vp debates that biden tears her apart and pulls back no punches. knowing that mccain camp they going to tell her to start crying to get the sympathy vote-remember clinton? i am a woman and wouldn’t vote for palin cause she a woman and didn’t vote for clinton either since she wouldn’t have been running the white house it would have been bill. palin needs to go back to alaska and never come back. now lets see if this gets posted since yes i did call her a pig, but i’ll do one better-a pig with glasses and red lipstick!
obama\biden 08
time for a change!

Posted by: terryswifey | September 10, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Once again we see double stands. It seems like the Republicans can dole out the insults but they don’t know how to take one even if that isn’t the intent. Now, had Obama said if you put lip stick on a moose it’s still a moose I would have definitely thought he was talking about Palin. However, since the pig state seems to be so common with a book with the same title, I will believe his analogy.

Posted by: y.sister | September 10, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Obama is desperate and sink to a new low!

Posted by: Victory | September 10, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Has anyone noticed how the media “switch” the morning after the Palin speech? Maybe it’s just me!

Posted by: gailw | September 10, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

I do not even care if he was referring to her. How is what he said any worse than her demeaning and ridiculing him? It is not….it is the same double standard over and over again….

Posted by: pthomas | September 10, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

women of America it is a pity you are buying all this crap from the McCain camp when actually he is just using palin. you no what it means to be used, women have always been used in so many ways and this is one other example.and as it always is the men thinks we are so stupid and will always get away with it but I have always thought the American woman cannot be fooled but a good example to women around the world. Palin is not Hilary.

Posted by: iofaith | September 10, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

Perception is reality people. Whether he meant it or not, if it came across as insulting to Palin that is all that matters.

Posted by: Eric | September 10, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

How dare the mccain folks think that Obama was trying to compare Mayor Palin to a pig, that would insult pigs everywhere.

Posted by: Pig | September 10, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

There is a difference, Hillary didn’t refer to herself as a pit-bull in lipstick a few days ago. Please democrats, keep up the attacks, because the more you do it the more their numbers go up and up. Silly democrats name calling for kids and politics are for grown ups. Now all of you non working liberals sitting home on a work day because half of you are unemployed misfits who needs a mommy government to hold you hand and tell you what to think and say, hear this. McCain is leading in all the polls, independents and white women are moving to his side in droves, his base has been energized (translate) all those evangelical Christians that got Bush elected have awoken. Senior citizens also vote in droves and guess who they’re voting for? Three major groups are now squarely behind them, Women, Christians, and seniors. I suggest all you liberals buy plenty of tissues, because in November there will be a lot of tears on your side. Yes it will hurt, but remember, big girls don’t cry! Or maybe a frown is just a smile turned upside-down.

Posted by: Zeek | September 10, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

‘putting lipstick on a pig
A term used by many, generally in reference to someone who may be trying to make something or someone look appealing or attractive when it quite clearly will not work, or will only deceive the dumbest of people.’
It clearly is, however, working and not only on the dumbest; how sad

Posted by: james | September 10, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Perception is reality people. Whether he meant it or not, if it came across as insulting Palin that is all that matters.

Posted by: Insults | September 10, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Compelling? Does the actual truth fit somewhere into that definition?

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Dear Readers. Please note, that based on the presentation and content of this ABC news article, McCain DID NOT Call Hilary a pig, and Obama DID NOT call Palin a pig! Assuming this article is an accurate representation of the “FACTS”, what is clear is that the McCain campaign, and Ex governor Swift (whom Palin is a replica of) are saying that you and I are brainless, and mindless fools, whom they can lie to, and yet assume we will vote for them any way. Fact is, whether you like or dislike Obama’s proposals and ideas for the policies that would shape the future if he is elected, Obama has thus far run an honorable campaign that has shown respect to the intelligence of the USA voters. Now all that remains to be seen is if “WE” as the collective mass of the electorate, deserve that respect, or if McCain and company is correct in assuming that we do not!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 10, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

I think it’s shameful that the McCain Campaign calls their own VP candidate a pig. Obama said nothing of the sort. He said that the Republican POLICY was like putting lipstick on a pig. They’re the ones who made the jump to Palin.

Posted by: Hoosier | September 10, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

The media and Obama camp are not only spreading bias against Palin, but also Rumor and personal attack!
Obama should apologize!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Finally! Enough is enough. Obama needs to use punchy sound bites and fight back. Put McCain and the whiney sneering snarkey Palins ( yeah both of them– given McCain’s promotion yesterday on the trail of the gun toting snow machine riding yahoo as a shining example of the second spouse) on the defense for a change. The Dems have been too polite for too long. BTW, we need the best and the brightest in the White House, not the mediocre and dimmest.

Posted by: Jeff | September 10, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

PERCEPTION is yesterday’s politics. AMERICA wants change and that includes politics. The simple truth will do.

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Perception is reality people. Whether he meant it or not, if it came across as insulting Palin that is all that matters.

Posted by: Perception | September 10, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

If Palin hadn’t been making the pit bull lipstick comment, I wouldn’t have thought twice about it, but this is an attack on her. The dems are frustrated and making huge mistakes, this was a big one. Seems the teflon senator has lost his teflon and things are starting to stick! Maybe he just needs to watch his sexism and his racism. BTW it isn’t because he is black that some people won’t vote for him, SO GET OVER IT!! (that line is tired and old)

Posted by: samhiguchi | September 10, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

It is evendent to me that the American people are in a great need for CHANGE! The ony way to truly CHANGE is to go back to your roots. As I see it Mr. Obamba’ roots do not lie in the USA but elsewhere and we as Americans need an American to leed us. I have not seen this in Mr Obamba but I have seen this it Sentor McCain.
I see that Mr Obamba has stated words out of context, this is common with inexperance. Maybe in 25 or 30 years he should try to run again but now is not his time to bring around CHANGE!!!
God Bless the U.S.A.

Posted by: Skip | September 10, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

This is no different than when Obama went to San Francisco and belittled people living in small towns before a crowd of elitist. Obama thinks he is smarter than everyone else and can get away with making a veiled demeaning and derogatory remark against Gov. Palin in a partisan crowd.

Posted by: ZerO Bama | September 10, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

I was wondering why the McCain camp did not take an opportunity to spin this as an insult to Palin. Because he used the term in a way that could have been seen as disparaging as well. Oh well, so much for a rebuttal.

Posted by: Julie | September 10, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Look at the crowd’s reaction when BO says the lipstick line. They (and we) know he was talking about Palin. The Democratic party took for granted their core constituency (women!). Disrespectfull lines like this one just keep pushing us away.

Posted by: USA-NC-08 | September 10, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

“Why should anyone believe McCain didn’t mean it about Hillary Clinton, but Obama meant it about Palin?”
Because it’s politics. Rabid Republicans will say it’s an insult, rabid Democrats will defend Obama and the rest of the electorate..the sane ones…will laugh, roll their eyes, and think “Someone tell me again..why should I vote for either of these clowns?”
Ignorance is bliss…and America is one hellaciously happy country.

Posted by: FranklyMyDear | September 10, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Book burning Sarah….I mean book banning
What type of person advocates censorship of books in a library?
Is Palin that much of a “social conservative”? That is what was done in fascist countries. Where governments spied on it’s citizens, and the military would kidnap people that would never be seen again!
This is a dangerous person. She has already shown how she mishandles the power of executive office.

Posted by: Eva Palin | September 10, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

hold your breath. I will tell you when he apologizes.

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

There should be some sort of intelligence test one has to pass before running for high office. I hope Obama wins, just so we can get someone erudite, or at least literate, in the White House. This whole debate comes down to the fact that we have some folks in the McCain campaing, and, judging by the comments here, in the general public, that don’t have a better than 4th grade education. Putting lipstick on a pig is a common expression folks. Stinky wrapped fish is an analogy. Read a book someone. Sheesh.

Posted by: Robert | September 10, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

I’m from Southwest Virginia. “Put lipstick on a pig…” is a very old expression here meaning someone is trying to disguise the truth. Mr. Obama was not insulting Ms. Palin. He was simply stating that you can’t make the last eight years look like a success by trying to make it look like something its not. This shows how out of touch the McCain campaign is with ordinary people like us. Southwest Virginia is one of the often ignored areas of our country. Virginia will be a swing state and this little known, seldom heard part of the state intends to make its voice heard. I, for one, repeat “you can put lipstick on a pig…but it’s still a pig”. If McCain/ Palin can’t do more than this constant whining, I say…”if you can’t run with the big dogs…stay on the porch”.

Posted by: Kim | September 10, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Let’s hold everyone to the same standards and stop the double standards. I wish the Republican party would put Governor Sarah Palin in front of the media just like everyone else. We’re talking about someone who could be President if McClain wins. It’s one thing to be a mother of several kids that every woman can relate to but quite another to deal with the demands and gray hairs of running the highest office in the land. And as they tell me when I apply for an Executive Administrative Assistant job for an executive, it’s not on the job training like a regular secretary job. They are not going to train you, you already have to know your job. Let’s be fair across the board with everyone, and stop the nitpicking with Senator Obama. Enough already!!

Posted by: bcindy | September 10, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Obama is going off the rails on the crazy train to quote Ozzy. The man is a nut, and if people would do what Hillary asked them to do: RESEARCH, they would see just what a whack job Obama really is. Educate yourself America. This Obama is no friend of the USA.

Posted by: Kitty | September 10, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Sounds like an ad about how McCain doesnt want to give you any healthcare to me….

Posted by: Beka | September 10, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

How dare the mccain folks think that Obama was trying to compare Mayor Palin to a pig, that would insult pigs everywhere.

Posted by: Pig | September 10, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

That’s insult against women. Where are the true feminists? Questioning whether Sarah could balance family and work?

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

‘ I have always thought the American woman cannot be fooled but a good example to women around the world. Palin is not Hilary.
Posted by: iofaith | Sep 10, 2008 8:36:55 AM’
the good news is that Palin is not Hillary for she, palin, has succeeded on her own merits. And of course people, including women, can be fooled look at how so many believed that MRS Clinton had experience, or that she was a feminist, or that she told the truth….

Posted by: barbara s. | September 10, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

OK people it’s the official opening of the political “silly season”.

Posted by: fairelection2008 | September 10, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

I am truly appalled at how grown up people are behaving on this page. I am a firm believer in free speech and if you would like to continue, go ahead. It’s just sad that you can’t have an honest debate on the issues and the people involved.
I have to say it is ridiculous that McCain’s camp is calling for an apology. McCain used this same rhetoric not so very long ago when refering to Hillary and her health care reform. He wasn’t referring to Hillary and Obama wasn’t referring to Palin. He does not need to apologize for anything. It’s a saying that has been around for AGES so to call it an insult to her is really a stretch.
This is political correctness going too far. Just because she is a woman, doesn’t mean every comment about her record, her demeanor, and such is a personal attack. As a woman, I for one am tired of hearing that. It does all woman a dis-service.

Posted by: Caryn FL | September 10, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Sure Obama wasn’t referring to Palin. Just like he didn’t mean to send the VP text message at 3 a.m. Certainly, the crowd drew an immediate slam on Palin from the remarks; just watch their hoots and claps.
Obama is either passive-aggressive and blatantly immature.
Or else he doesn’t realize the impact of the words he speaks and will be constantly backtracking in his statements to world leaders ala “that’s not what I meant”.
This man isn’t ready to be President.

Posted by: marylou | September 10, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

This is all too funny, its ok for McSame and Ms Palin to use endearing terms to make a point on reform but not Obama?
Wasn’t he referring to policy? I think some people have pretty thin skin alright. I remember the Republicans going after Hillary point blank with, “put your apron on and go back to the kitchen if you can’t take it.” Since McSame has picked up the “change” mantra from Obama they don’t know really what change is all about, thus the comments.
If Ms Palin wants to refer to herself as a vicious pitbull with lipstick thats ok, but she also inferred it to all hockey moms. Did I take offense? Was it a sexist remark?
Not all moms are like Ms Palin , to say the least,but does any of this have anything to do with being VP?

Posted by: Judi | September 10, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

No apology. Sarah Palin is a scarey religious right extermist just salivating at the chance to push her views on the american public.
Why would she ask the librarian about banning books if she wasnt serious? Another old saying – where theres smoke, theres usually fire.

Posted by: smithington01 | September 10, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Is anyone truly surprised by this defense? It’s what I expected all along. Anything said in this campaign that can be twisted into a sexist remark, will be. McCain has said the same thing about the Clinton health care plan and I didn’t think he was talking about her. Maybe it was some weird Republican code and he was talking about her. McCain needs to let Palin get off the porch and start running with the big dogs. (Hey she compared herself to a pit bull so I can use that metaphor.) His campaign and allies have been in this protective mode, sheltering her from ad hoc media events. It makes me think they don’t have much confidence in her, which in turn, makes me think she may not be able to cut it on the world stage.

Posted by: Catherine | September 10, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

If you can’t run with the BIG dogs, get out of the way.
If McCain/Palin are offended by this, imaging their reaction when they hear how the economy is in the toilet thanks to the republicans!

Posted by: Bel TX | September 10, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

ENOUGH!!! I cannot believe how gullible the media and the people are. Senator Obama made a folksy statement which has been used by many before him, including McCain earlier this year, to express that one cannot change a truth simply by dressing it up. Much like “a wolf in sheep’s clothing”, “a new purse with old sow’s ears”. The media needs to challenge Senator McCain instead of giving him a platform on which to “debate” this ridiculous behavior. Also, I Governor Palin needs so much defending maybe she should not be running for the position of vice president and heaven forbid being next in line for president of the United States.

Posted by: cynthia | September 10, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

It is a dangerous and ominous development for people to band together and call themselves a “Truth Squad.” They may be a “squad”, but judging by their initial statement, respect for the “truth” is not something they know a whole lot about.

Posted by: RoyRolling | September 10, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

The article is silly, the implication by Gov. Swift is silly … this story reads like something going on among my 10-year-old daughter’s classmates. The nation has a lot at stake in its future — for the American people and the world as a global leader. Serious politicians aren’t supposed to get mired down in pettiness, and I’m sure Sen. Obama meant no harm in using an old-as-dirt expression.

Posted by: em | September 10, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Your not changing anyone’s minds here. That’s a problem with parties. Even if one nominee is better they will still vote for their side. However there are a few that are still open-minded. So decide who is going to fix our economy and protect us? I know I will feel wayyy more safe with a certain nominee over the other. the same one of them seems to mean what he says and doesn’t say it for another vote. As far as the economy that’s close. Any economic changes will be trial and error at this point. I’ll go with protecting my family, friends, and country. I bet you can’t guess who that is…yeah right.

Posted by: patriot | September 10, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Hey CW, It’s annoying when u nag about what Hillary would have done in response to McCain…you need to be quiet. She lost. You have a decision to cast your vote for who you want for President but that Hillary stuff is old and overdone. And if that’s what you base this on then you really weren’t for Hillary, you’re a republican in sheeps clothing. Vote for the people or team that best represent what you want for America. It’s ashame that the repubulicans once again are managing to split the UNITED States of America.

Posted by: Cindi for Obama | September 10, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

You know pigs are very intelligent animals. Now if he would have called her a chicken….

Posted by: pt | September 10, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

America, be aware of Obama’s arrogance! Remember what he said about small town workers clinging on religion, guns…?

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

She should be able to balance family and work seeing that she had a cook at the expense of Alaskan taxpayers. But hey – she is just your ORDINARY HOCKEY MOM. All ordinary MOMS have a chef.

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Obama is proving himself to be like the pig Napoleon in George Orwell’s “Animal Farm,” desiring power for himself and taking America one step closer to communism… Obama is proving himself to be the true pig in this election… He is truly wallowing in the mud…

Posted by: PaxInTX | September 10, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

I keep thinking Americans can’t get any dumber, but now we’re focused on this nonsense while we’re fighting two wars, in the middle of rising energy prices and a mortgage crisis that looks like it might take another victim according to today’s headlines. Can’t we discuss the issues rather than all of this?

Posted by: jmengate | September 10, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

More than ever it is evident that Barach Obama is at the very least sexist and feels superior towards all women, not just republican women, but democrats as well. look at how he publicly embarrassed Senator Hillary Clinton, by choosing not to even vet her, and now he expects Hillary to come to his aid? Calling Governor Palin a “pig with lipstick” is a real shame, she is a good person and does not deserve that type of degrading talk from anyone let alone a man who is seeking the highest office in the land! Shame on him and his sexist views!

Posted by: Gus | September 10, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

The phrase “putting lipstick on a pig” is an American colloquialism that means, “making the unattractive superficially attractive,” with overtones of futility or of a lost cause
When Clinton released her healthcare plan last year, McCain portrayed it as a remake of the one she proposed Bill Clinton was President. “I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” he said.
IT ISN’T ALL ABOUT “HER” although the Bush Sidekick Campaign would like to keep the focus there and avoid the REAL ISSUES
Clever? Yes.
Cheap? Absolutely.
Stupid? Utterly.

Posted by: Patricia | September 10, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

I think it was wrong for Sarah Palin to call all hockey moms dogs. Why does she hate all hockey moms?

Posted by: Scott | September 10, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Thank you Jake!! McSame can say the expression relating to Hillary and get away with it but Obama can’t?? The McSame campaign makes me laugh. They are so self righteous and dumb! Sadly enough, some people will be duped and believe that Obama was being sexist just because McSame says so. People are dumb.

Posted by: mollygonz | September 10, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Lipstick on a Pig. When will we learn. Fight fire with fire. You don’t respond with explanations of what the senator meant by the phrase, you Attack. The only response to this ginned up controversy should be:
“Of course if I was the McCain/ Palin campaign with breaking news items about Troopergate and charging the State of Alaska for nights spent in my home, I’d change the subject and react to a phony charge of calling me a pig.”
“Damn it Maverick, get in the fight!”
Top Gun

Posted by: KayoKayo | September 10, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Hey “Kitty”,
“The man wants to double to capital gains tax and that will hurt everyone”
Something to consider: Capital gains taxes are at their lowest level in 3 decades (15%) due to Bush’s tax plan WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE SOON ANYWAY. Capital gains taxes in the US have traditionally been in the 30-40% range anyway.
I think YOU need to do some research too!

Posted by: cls | September 10, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Well if he wanted to be politically correct he could have called her a sow.
This is ridiculous. McCain and Palin need to focus on the issues not stupid nonsense like this.

Posted by: J | September 10, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Blah!, Blah!, Blah!, What are a all of us talking about today? Did Obama insult Palin or didn’t he? Obama supporters are such sheep, keep talking about Gov. Palin. The messiah has lost his Staff next it will be his Robes and sandals.

Posted by: Jim | September 10, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Keep talking, people. Please, keep talking.
Make no mistake about it, this was not a folksy statement. This was a fairly big miscalculation. How did he think this would play on Main Street? It speaks to his lack of sensitivity to female voters, and perhaps females in general. What a colossal blunder.

Posted by: Woody | September 10, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

McCain said the exact same thing about clinton. McCain needs to back up and not be a hypocrite.

Posted by: Kevin | September 10, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

In lightr of Governor Palin’s recent joke about pit bulls and pigs, it was in poor taste for Obama to use the analogy of lipstick on a pig. Was it deliberate, just plain stupid, bad timing, or just another example of bad judgement? There are no other choices.
His comments were very unprofessional, and definately not Presidential.

Posted by: JW Florida | September 10, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

We might be getting a little thin skinned. The “lipstick on a pig” saying has been around for a long time. Not real common but it’s there. I don’t think it was aimed at Palin. Obama is smarter than that but it probably did damage his campaign a little.
The smartest thing Palin can do is a shoulder shrug and change the subject. Refuse to even acknowledge the comment at all. That would show that she can take whatever is dished out and that she’s above name calling.

Posted by: Oonogil | September 10, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

If you put lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig, Sweetie.

Posted by: Patti | September 10, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

The only reasons campaigns like McCain’s can get away with such childishness is because the media lets them. They don’t want to talk about the issues, so they make up some silly faux-controversy. ABC, you are responsible for the candidates not talking about the war, jobs, health care, education, the environment, energy independence, etc on the front page. You are responsible for allowing such childishness to be the story. And as a result, you, ABC, are hurting America.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | September 10, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Barack can still always fall back on his old “ohhhh, i didn’t mean it like THAT!” excuse he’s used for everything.
Right…. Sweetie?

Posted by: gigglechick | September 10, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Well I think Palin IS a pig and how can they talk about sexism when they dont support Equal pay or a woman’s right to her body? See thats the trump card that Obama didnt have over Hillary.

Posted by: Beka | September 10, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Funny that McCain attacks Obama for using the “lipstick on a pig” reference. However, as ABC News and CBS News report, McCain used the exact same term to describe Hillary’s healthcare program a few months ago, and McCain didn’t apologize for that.
He is such a LOSER.

Posted by: Michael Joseph | September 10, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

The implosion is beginning! That Hadron Collider ain’t got nothing on Obama!

Posted by: Patti | September 10, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Every single Republican commenting on the “audacity” of this statement clearly did not read the article. I am so TIRED of ignorant people touting the party line without bothering to read anything or do even one minutes worth of research. I am so MAD that the conservatives keep insisting on voting STUPID people into office (Bush partied his way thru school, McCain graduated LAST in his class and Palin went to 6 colleges in 6 years) who know NOTHING about economics, science, forgeign and domestic affairs. If ANY of you had HALF a brain you’d stop buying the rhetoric and do your research. I need a cup of coffee.

Posted by: allie | September 10, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

to quote Ann Richards, “put a fork in him, he’s done” bye bye Obama!

Posted by: tom | September 10, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

There is no room in politics or football for hurt feelings and whining over something as silly as this. Jane Swift sounds like my mother arguing with my father over whether or not he is sensitive enough. This is the big leagues people, hypersensitivity has no place in this game. Is Sarah going to have her Truth Squad bawl out Putin and Chavez if they are insensitive to her use of lipstick and how that might in some inane way relate to an idiomatic expression.

Posted by: AnitaBreak | September 10, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

If Obama had said “if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck and floats like a duck, it’s a duck” does that mean he was calling Palin a duck? Come on, we are are smarter than the “throw anything at the wall and hope something sticks” politics the GOP is engaging in.
If you ACTUALLY listen to the speech, rather than immediately flying off the handle at the mention of the word lipstick, you will see that he is taking about the concept of change being brought to Washington. People have to stop making inferences from everything that comes out of the candidates mouths….”hum, Obama said lipstick…he MUST be talking about Palin.” It just is ridiculous how everyone in the GOP is acting like they do not know what that proverb means- you can try to package it differently, but in the end it is still the same old thing.

Posted by: Tricia | September 10, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

They wouldnt have hesitated to wrip Hilary to SHREDS !! Double Republican Standard as usual. Same ole, same ole.

Posted by: Pam | September 10, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

wrong staniasm…..what you mean is that is has all been proven to be true…if it werent and if all the info right now out about your pig in lipstick
were even remotely false, then she would be out there everyday taking questions like any real American running for office in this country would do. But she is hiding the lies and in effect only giving more weight to the fact that she is indeed nothing but a lying pig in a skirt. Yea, I said it!

Posted by: dean | September 10, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

I would say the McCain camp/supporters are a bunch of whiners, but then I might not be able to use that word – as they already coined it [Phil Gramm sayig we are a Nation of whiners (July 2008) and Sara Palin referencing Hillary Clinton) March 2008]
Geez – give me a break… oh wait, that was a TV show from the 80′s – can I still use that phrase?

Posted by: Pixelww | September 10, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Nobody raised a fuss when McCain said that about Hillary. Hypocrites.

Posted by: J | September 10, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Wow … Republicans want to make up this stuff about Obama, when they themselves have said exactly the same thing. Republican = hypocrite … right? How will they ever handle national security issues with Iran. When Iran’s leader makes a negative comment about the US, McCain and Palin and the republicans will make something up so they can cry poor me? I am more convinced than ever that we need to have Obama and Biden in there to handle the important national security issues we are facing!

Posted by: Tim S. | September 10, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

I for one am sick and tired of the lies that the Republicans bandy about to meet their own agenda. Obama didn’t call her a pig. Why would he? She’s not a pig. She’s a power mad pentecostal creationist. Which is worse? The truth or a trumped up porcine charge?

Posted by: pittsbugh jen | September 10, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Stacey Noble<<<McCain “might” cut your tax, but if his Health car plan passes he will raise your taxable income by making your Health care premium “Taxable” income. Oh yes and let us not see the whole picture! After lowering your “Tax rate” and raising your “taxable income” he will then continue to pander to the corporate special interests there by causing increases in the costs of all goods and services. I’m sure you’re a very good and capable mom, wife and perhaps even buisness woman, but “WE THE PEOPLE” including you must look beyond the rhetoric, lies and political smoke screen to the truth and path to a better nation and world for you children! Please, think, be curious and pull back the curtain of lies to expose the truth!!! The Republicans want you to vote AGAINST your own self-interests!!!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 10, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

The Republican machine has been using this formula for a long time. The fact is the American undecided voter does not fully understand the issues. They don’t want to hear how bad things are. They already know it. What they want to hear is how we are all going to get back our picket fences and the American Dream. They want to hear how some day they will feel safe again. Republicans have always managed to pull off that spin and the Demarcates always stick to the issues. That’s why the Democrats always loose. The fact is when Bill Clinton won, he won on selling the American dream as it related to the present. He told everyone he would get it back for them. He fully embraced the Arkansas Bubba persona. The average American doesn’t read these blogs and they are afraid of people who sound too smart. So if you really want change then all that matters is doing what ever it takes to win – Period. And if you don’t believe that, look at history and look at the present. Why do you think McCain is still leading in the polls? Because he is selling the white picket fence. It doesn’t matter if it’s true. Most people don’t want to hear the truth. They just want to hear what will make them feel better about their vote.
In my opinion Obama’s campaign is spending too much time on the issues and not enough time selling the dream.
All the great leaders sold a dream. It’s how you get people on board. If you talk about the issues they just get bored.
Obama needs to get the spin going or he will loose and we will all be screwed.
Oh, and we women should be outraged by McCain’s choice. He is pandering to us by picking some pretty fluff that HASN’T GOT A CLUE WHAT’S GOING ON IN THE WORLD. Again, it’s all designed to make us feel better. , Any woman that thinks Palin is a great idea for women, you are confused or you are desperate to be stuck back in the kitchen. She is dangerous, for the country AND for women.
Obama – if you want to win – you better start attacking and taking no prisoners.

Posted by: LisaH | September 10, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Stacey Noble…McCain “might” cut your tax, but if his Health car plan passes he will raise your taxable income by making your Health care premium “Taxable” income. Oh yes and let us not see the whole picture! After lowering your “Tax rate” and raising your “taxable income” he will then continue to pander to the corporate special interests there by causing increases in the costs of all goods and services. I’m sure you’re a very good and capable mom, wife and perhaps even buisness woman, but “WE THE PEOPLE” including you must look beyond the rhetoric, lies and political smoke screen to the truth and path to a better nation and world for you children! Please, think, be curious and pull back the curtain of lies to expose the truth!!! The Republicans want you to vote AGAINST your own self-interests!!!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 10, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Insult against women? I don’t feel insulted. But I DO feel insulted by the fact that it seems that McCain has put a token female in order to win this election. Well, I don’t completely know if that is true, so it may not be fair to make a definite judgement on that.
But…Au contraire, the McCain campaign has attempted to smear Obama many times. If anyone is running an honourable campaign, it’s Obama- he defended Palin’s daughter and said that she shouldn’t be dragged into the campaign. He has focussed on attacking POLICIES and refrained from attacking the PERSON. I can’t the same for the McCain campaign.
Palin: Belittled Obama’s work as a community organizer and community organizers everywhere.
First they accused Obama of trying to play victim. Now they are crying foul over Palin’s being “bullied”. Waaaaah!
I would say she had it coming if she decided to be snide, she ought to be prepared to fend off barbs from the other camp. Won’t it be SEXIST if we shield her from them because she’s a woman? Wouldn’t THAT be insulting because we are insinuating that she is weak because she is a woman and cannot hold her own?
If he had said “putting lipstick on a moose/pitbull” then that would be clear. But he didn’t. This is just more smokescreen to deflect interest from REAL issues.

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

I cannot believe some of you are actually suggesting this was about Palin. You’re idiots..simply idiots

Posted by: LAT | September 10, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Unfortunately, it’s former Mass. Gov. Jane Swift who has made an ass of herself by insisting that the “lipstick on a pig” comment was directed toward Palin or McCain personally. How can she have served as Gov. and not understood such an expression?

Posted by: kpeiffer | September 10, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Perhaps the Palin Truth Squad should publish a guide for the media on what words candidate Obama is allowed to use. Because, so far, every day there is a new whine and defense for the words used by the media and candidate Obama.
Doctors and studies will tell you, the difference between an adult and a child is that if both have their toes stepped on, a child cannot discern whether it is deliberate but an adult can know the context.
I’ve heard of acting younger, but behaving as a 4-year old is a real stretch for the McCain campaign that published this juvenile complaint.

Posted by: RoyRolling | September 10, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

In Iowa last October, McCain drew comparisons between Hillary Clinton’s current healthcare plan and the one she championed in 1993: “I think they put some lipstick on the pig, but it’s still a pig.” Referring to Hillary Clinton again, he used roughly the same line in May, after effectively claiming the Republican nomination.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | September 10, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

The so-called “News’ Media are not doing their work. This should not be news. Asking Palin to discuss policies should be news. The economy, the war in Iraq, in Afghanistan, foreclosures, education should be the news. Like McClellan said if you the journalists did their job, we wouldn’t have gone to war in Iraq.
Shame on all of you. I am so disgusted. We are all going down because of a few self absorbed people.

Posted by: LA | September 10, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

But, their lies are ok?:
John Feehery, a Republican strategist, said the campaign is entering a stage in which skirmishes over the facts are less important than the dominant themes that are forming voters’ opinions of the candidates.
“The more the New York Times and The Washington Post go after Sarah Palin, the better off she is, because there’s a bigger truth out there and the bigger truths are she’s new, she’s popular in Alaska and she is an insurgent,” Feehery said. “As long as those are out there, these little facts don’t really matter.”
Is this what they think of the integrity & intelligence of the voter. How long are we going to continue to
swallow this garbage whole?

Posted by: justapreacher | September 10, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

what’s the big deal? she already compared herself to a dog in lipstick, so why not a pig? republicans are ridiculous with their false outrage.
Posted by: pongo———–Because the Republicans would rather focus on things like this, than debate issues and policies.

Posted by: CW | September 10, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

I wanted Hillary, and I was seriously considering John McCain, but his pick of Palin is grotesque. A man with Palin’s credentials would have been laughed at, but since Palin is a woman she got a pass. McCain wants a token woman, not a real one. He wants a Barbie, a political trophy wife.

Posted by: sylvie2566 | September 10, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

I’m sorry if Clinton or anyone else inthis race had said, “Let’s call a spade a spade” or “the boy who cried wolf” The entire MSM would explode in an orgy or racist accusations.
Let’s call a spade a spade folks, Obama hates women and denegrates his female candidates all the time.

Posted by: s.b. | September 10, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

18 million of us tried to tell the “Entitled One” to pick Hillary as his running mate, but NO…he just had to put in Biden. Let Nobama watch McCain and Palin waltz into the White House in November.

Posted by: roger king | September 10, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Bill and Hillary must be laughing up a storm. What goes around comes around.

Posted by: geevill | September 10, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

This criticism of Obama is bogus and strictly politics. This lipstick bit is a common expression and now that McCain is feeling his oats they will go after Obama with anything. This is becoming a disgusting campaign. I think it’s also interesting that the Clintons are doing virtually nothing for Obama. No surprise. They pray he will lose and won’t vote for him. I would put a million dollars on that.

Posted by: Bonnie | September 10, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Some people are really really stupid, I cannot beleive that until I read what they can think. The person who is talking about Obama being Muslim? Do you have any proof of that or your are only repeting it because Mcain campaign told you so? They are brainwashing you poor people. They are politicians and they know the rules: “We will keep saying the same things to them and for sure some stupid ones will beleive us.” Poor you!!! You are easy to be duped. Anyway, vote for Mc Cain as once you voted for Bush since you prefer to live in poverty than voting for a black person.

Posted by: Angelina | September 10, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Let’s call a spade a spade folks. Obama doesn’t like women who challenge him.

Posted by: s.b. | September 10, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Please refer to the Daily Show’s commentary on the Palin Gender Card from Weds 9/3. When Hillary was still in the race, the GOP and it’s media cronies were unforgiving the second she opened her mouth about being a woman, claiming she shouldn’t be running if she can’t run with the big dogs. Funny now how they have their own set of XX chromosomes, they’re so quick to pull the gender card and call it bias. I’m so sick of Republican hypocrisy, contradiction and failure to see reality.
Hey ABC News…why does it always take so long to load political punch? It kills my computer every time!

Posted by: Jodi | September 10, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

So it’s not OK to use Palin’s own mantra against her, because she’s a woman, and you can’t say anything insulting to McCain at all, because he’s a veteran. Around now, all of those people shouting “liberals want to censor my speech!” best shut-up. I can’t even believe how well the GOP is doing to imitate every last aspect of the Obama campaign, P.C. whining and all.

Posted by: grr | September 10, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

We see the real Obama when he is losing in the polls: a sexist, arrogant, and downright unrespectable person.
Obama has had to cut ties with many people in order to run for president. Obama’s statements prove that bad habits die hard.
Obama is a pig.

Posted by: Benjamin | September 10, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

I’m not a politician, or someone hired to blast the other candidate.
I’m just a disabled American.
I get by on private insurance not SSDI.
A lot of you on both sides spew forth the most hateful rhetoric I have ever seen.
There has always be a good amount of zeal campaigning for the one we want to win.
But people, this mind set is what got our country in the mess it is in now.
8 years ago Florida screwed up and folks had to go to courts to straighten it out.
The party that lost has taken the position that I’m not going to work with the others, they stole the election, therefore ‘they’re not the boss of me’. The press that backed the losing candidate decided they were going to ‘get’ the guy that stole the election and all this crap has been a burden on the American voter ever since.
No wonder we can’t get anything done. Partisans are sitting across the aisle acting like two year olds.
Main stream media has stooped so low that newspapers and magazines are failing.
We need to stop the bickering. We need to show the rest of the world that we are grown ups.
Most of all we need to remember United we stand, divided we fall.
Vote for who you want, not becuase Oprah or Orielly told you who to vote for. But because you made a decision based on information outside the romper room we call main stream media.

Posted by: Tom - small town Indiana | September 10, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

The Democratic Party better conjure up some Mojo. I am not pouring money and effort into getting Barack Obama elected to see it disapear like Gore and Kerry. Get the machine moving!

Posted by: Obama Supporter | September 10, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Lipstick? How about you can dress a pig up, but it’s still a pig. The listick comment was intentional.

Posted by: LongT | September 10, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

The people getting all up in arms about Obama’s comments either don’t understand the idiomatic uses of the English language or have fallen prey to an issue created by the flame-fanning media. Is there any possibility this was an intentional double-entendre? Of course there is!!! This is serious business, but it’s also a game: a game for grownups, that is. Grow up and get in the game, whiners.

Posted by: Republican with a sense of humor | September 10, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

This is all about distraction. The Repubs are keeping this silly stuff front and center so no one will focus on issues. This is the only way they can win. They know darn well he didn’t mean Palin, but it serves them well if they can fan this into a controversy. Dems need to ignore this and stay on the issues.

Posted by: obamamama | September 10, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Please, someone tell me this idiocy is all just a bad dream so I can wake up to a world where people actually think.

Posted by: CW of Eugene | September 10, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Sarah Palin is playing the victim card too much.

Posted by: FilmMD | September 10, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Tom – small town Indiana: Bravo! Well said!

Posted by: obamamama | September 10, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Tired of the McCain POW stuff. Run on politics and not pity. Ask him if he would prefer to be a POW or one of the 4156 DECEASED American soldiers. Ask his daughter who has more pain- herself or the families of these TRUE heroes who DIED for their country.

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

freudian slip??? I would think so except Biden used lipstick and a introduction to Obama used the term lipstick!!! DUMB? INEXPERIENCED? SNOTTY? YES to all of the above. NOT PRESIDENTIAL!!!! YES

Posted by: lovingpolitics | September 10, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

I guess the republicans think they are the only ones allowed to use certain expressions, huh? When they say them it’s OK, but when used by someone else, they are offensive. McCain may be 72 years old, but he still needs to grow up !

Posted by: MMBA08 | September 10, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

By that logic, we should not elect McCain and Palin either.
Palin has been associated with the Alaskan Independence Party and McCain with the mafia.
Obama seems far more presidential, he has not used attacks that are clearly aimed at the person- this one about the pig is debatable. If you would read up the thing about Ayers, you’d find Obama is not all buddy-buddy with him.
McCain is the one who has a longer record of insulting women-Chelsea Clinton and his wife, remember?
Obama is not a Muslim. He was talking about rumours about his being a Muslim. And even if he were a Muslim, I don’t see him dressing his wife and daughter in a chador, so he seems like a moderate Muslim then, eh?

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Jmengate…Good point! Lets see what are the issues? A Republican tax cut that transferred wealth from the lower and middle class to the wealthiest upper class. Administrative policies that caused middle class jobs to be lost and buying power to be diminished as peoples earning power was not able to keep pass with the rising cost of living. An economy that focused increasingly on the marketing of luxury goods as the percent of the population unable to buy the bare essentials of live steadily grew. A national state of public and private indebtedness that continues to grow as the Nation moves ever closer to insolvency. A credit and banking industry that is collapsing all around us like a house of cards on the verge of pushing the stock market into a collapse of historic proportions…Oh but I’m sorry, you think I’m talking about today? No my friends I’m talking of the last weeks before the great depression!!!! That is the issue! We need FDR!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 10, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Obama is the real pig here and I do believe he meant to call Palin a pig. I supported Hillary and now I will be voting for McCain/Palin.
I don’t agree 100% with either candidates, but Palin has made it much easier to choose.
McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: Anna | September 10, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Hilarious, saying you can put lipstick on a pig and it’s still a pig! What was really funny was the sweeties in the background applauding (then probably checking their lipstick)! Wonder how much they got paid for the stand up comedy. This election just gets funnier and funnier. LOL, Barak Oblunder.

Posted by: Rktsci3127 Fl | September 10, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

In Iowa last October, McCain drew comparisons between Hillary Clinton’s current healthcare plan and one she had championed previously: “I think they put some lipstick on the pig, but it’s still a pig.” He used the same line again in May.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | September 10, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

MCCAIN HAS DECIDED TO LIE, TWIST WORDS AND DO ANYTHING TO WIN. THE MEDIA HAS NOT DONE THEIR JOB TO SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT AND INSTEAD JUST GIVES A PASS ON THE FACTS.
THERE ARE TOO LAZY AND HAVE BEEN COWED INTO SUBMISSION BY THE REPUBLICAN SMEAR MACHINE.

Posted by: lily | September 10, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

When you can’t talk about the issues, you talk about lipstick.

Posted by: kent3536 | September 10, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Do not compare McCain’s comment on Clintons’s policy with Obama’s on Palin. Several days ago Palin just used the lipstick phrase in her great speech. Obama is either extremely ignorant or arrogant to give such a comment.—- Obama should apologize!!!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

It shows that the GOP has ZERO to say. They are hypocrites of the highest order and would prefer to talk about nothing that about the real issues.
And guess what…. after last week and the fake storm McSame kicked up about the “media” they are just now repeating what he wants them to say. Pathetic.

Posted by: Pete | September 10, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

So when the McCain campaign hears the word “pig” they immediately think of Governor Palin? Wow, talk about misogynistic.

Posted by: TSnow27604 | September 10, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

ok Palin Question,
If Governor Sarah Palin is so grounded with the conception of life that she would not allow a women to choose an abortion …even when it come to rap or incest … then why does she support the Death penalty?
And I’m an independent so this is not a bias question
After all life is life …

Posted by: david | September 10, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Anyone who calls this an insult to Palin is pretty much delusional.

Posted by: TCS | September 10, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

BTW, where is Senator McCain’s flag pin?
He didn’t wear one when he accepted the nomination. He hasn’t worn one at any speech that he’s given since then that I’ve seen footage of.
So let’s get this straight. Obama is not patriotic because he doesn’t wear one, but because McCain served and was a POW he doesn’t have to wear one, despite his own standard set for Obama. Does McCain and his disciples realize that by doing this he’s equated his service and POW status to a lapel pin? Seriously has nobody realized this?
And what about Meggy Mac telling a newscaster that nobody knows about how soldiers suffer but her family? Really? REALLY? Oh and before you GOP thugs jump on the “family is off limits” bandwagon double standard, Meggy went on a prime time news show, making her a surrogate. Fair game. Kind of like Cindy’s explaining that proximity to Russia equates to foreign policy experience for Palen.

Posted by: landlocked | September 10, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

I am constantly appalled by the seeming ignorance of the American voters. Did you not read or listen to what Obama actually said? There was no reference to Palin at all. He was using McCain’s own comments about Hillary’s health care plan against McCains “change” plan.
I saw a poll yesterday that said the majority of people polled said issues weren’t important to them in this race. What is?? Lipstick color? Come on people, Pay attention!

Posted by: ladybug2 | September 10, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Let me break the code for you. If it is coming out of the current McShame campaign it is a half truth a smear or an outright lie. When the media just refuses to confront these people directly it does not do its job. Before Iraq the media failed to do it’s job /. Over 4999 brave America lie silent because of that sad fact.

Posted by: vin | September 10, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Well as a woman I was OUTRAGED when McCain picked a woman just because she was a woman ! But if he thinks he can win with his Token by his side, he’s WRONG AGAIN. I would NEVER vote for a woman just because she is a woman.

Posted by: Pam | September 10, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

The Republicans would rather spend the rest of the campaign creating fake issues like the lipstick case rather than focus on the issues that afflicting this country, a bad economy, inadequate health care, foreclosures, global warming. Don’t be fooled by the smoke and mirrors.

Posted by: Yvonne | September 10, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Clearly, People who are making this comment an issue are trying to make something out of nothing.
Sen. Obama clearly was referring to McCain policy issues being the same as Bush’s and just because McCain has added his new buzz word “change” (hence the lipstick), their policies are still “PIGS”. The Bush/McCain policies have deeply effected working Americans.
This is another example of the “same old polictical games” republicans play. “Attack and Distract” Another smoke screen to aviod dealing with the issue. “More failed Policies”
If anyone owes anyone an apology… McCain and Bush should be giving it to working American families, the families of dead soliders that lost their lives in this UNJUST War, and the wounded veterners that McCain voted against for better benefits. LET’S DEAL WITH THE TRUTH AND STICK TO THE ISSUES…

Posted by: Bruce | September 10, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

The simple truth
If Sarah Palin can not handle a press conference with the media, she can not handle being vice president
The simple fact

Posted by: Les | September 10, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

When I hear Senator Obama make the pig lipstick remark and everyone applaud, my first thought he was calling Sara Palin a pig and I’m an independent. I thought it was a tasteless remark and I did not like it.

Posted by: Sandy | September 10, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Do not compare McCain’s comment on Clintons’s policy with Obama’s on Palin. Several days ago Palin just used the lipstick phrase in her great speech. Obama is either extremely ignorant or arrogant to give such a comment.—- Obama should apologize!!!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

By the way, virtually all of you so called Hillary supporters who say you’re not voting for Obama over this are either liars or making me think there should be some kind of intelligence test before people are allowed to vote.

Posted by: CW of Eugene | September 10, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

The simple truth
If Sarah Palin can not handle a press conference with the media, she can not handle being vice president
The simple fact

Posted by: Les | September 10, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Ladybug when Obama said the word lipstick!! It was a direct attack onto Palin. She used the term last week.

Posted by: Jim Rod | September 10, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

As well as Obama is educated, he could have used better choice of words. Why use any statement that can be used against you. I’m afraid that we are at the point when a candidate injures their ring finger and removes the wedding ring, the media and opponents will question the marital relationship of the candidate.

Posted by: Don | September 10, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Another non-economic isuue. Did anyone notice the economy is bad? The Republicans hope you don’t.

Posted by: Reason | September 10, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Lipstick on a pit bull, hockey mom or lipstick on a pig. You decide. Obama should have never said that because too many people could have/would have thought Obama was referring to Sarah Palin’s comment she had made at the convention. The other people who are being quoted were not talking about Sarah and the hockey mom statement (this was before Sarah’s comments were ever heard). John McCain’s doesn’t wear lipstick. Obama’s audience certainly knew who he was referring to. He opened his mouth and put his foot in there. I bet he regrets it today because the voters are hearing about it now for the 2nd day. Damage done.
He’s back tracking on the surge, the no child left behind (agrees w/Bush now), what’s next, after going after McCain’s honor and calling them liars and saying Palin is stretching her record. And his party hackers are sent to dig on Palin’s background while 3 democratic leaders are involved in the investigation of her firing the safety official in Alaska. Change, Obama? We can’t trust your change. You just want to smear to win not win to lead.

Posted by: Christie | September 10, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Obama is not stupid. He is arrogant. That is because American voters have been lenient on him & let him get away from so many subtle insults that Obama directed at his opponent. Let me list just a few: “Hillary Clinton is PERIODICALLY down” (a subtle yet disgusting reference to woman menstrual cycle camouflaged in the poll number). Scratching his head with his middle finger up while his opponents are speaking (an *-you gestured camouflaged in a head scratch). Yet, many American voters look the other way and nominated him. BUT THIS KIND OF SUBTLE INSULT IS NO LONGER TOLERATED. WOMEN OF A AMERICA, DUMP THIS INSOLENT SEXIST PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!!!

Posted by: ablanche08 | September 10, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

It’s entertaining that people are calling women dumb. How about followers who worship an inexperienced politician because he gives them “hope and inspiration” and because he didn’t vote for a war. Now women, who have always been swing voters, are being criticized for doing the same exact thing. I think there are idiots in both parties and they are not just female.

Posted by: ExDem | September 10, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

If Obama should apologize, when are McCain and Palin going to apologize for lying? Even after their lies are exposed, they just lie lie lie.

Posted by: CW of Eugene | September 10, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Frankly, I think this is a talking point for the Republicans; could the comment be construed as slamming Palin? Yeah, maybe – MAYbe. It probably WAS “sort of” aligned with Palin’s hockey mom/lipstick comment, as sort of a snide backhand. But, in fairness, the expression Obama used IS a common one in the context he used it in – either way, let’s stop flogging this horse and go on to bigger & better things

Posted by: Dont_like_Obama | September 10, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Palin was making a joke about herself eluding to her toughness. Obama should have known better than to fall into this word trap, especially after the nasty attacks the left has been leveling at Palin. Unless of course he planned to say it and hope the audience got the meaning. Check the tape, of course they do. Check the Daily Kos, THEY got it as a reference to Palin. If his supporters “get it”, then it really doesn’t matter that the saying is known, the meaning was implied.
By the way two seconds later wasn’t he talking about how tired Palin must be raising five kids? You really think she needs to be patronized in that way? Was McCain patronizing Hillary? No, he was clearly talking about the health care plan.

Posted by: frank | September 10, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Frankly, I think this is a talking point for the Republicans; could the comment be construed as slamming Palin? Yeah, maybe – MAYbe. It probably WAS “sort of” aligned with Palin’s hockey mom/lipstick comment, as sort of a snide backhand. But, in fairness, the expression Obama used IS a common one in the context he used it in – either way, let’s stop flogging this horse and go on to bigger & better things

Posted by: Dont_like_Obama | September 10, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Let’s get one thing straight people: Obama did NOT call Sarah Palin a pig. Nor did he call John McCain an old fish.
Read the transcripts. Drop the middle school mentality. America’s problems are too serious to harp on about this kind of silliness.

Posted by: spencer | September 10, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

This is part and parcel for small town parochial thinking. I live in a small town after living in one of the largest cities for 25 years. I can tell you that it is a town full of small thinkers. Small minds, narrow views and I have to just ignore them to be happy. Palin and crew are small town fish in a BIG pond and pretty soon shark with lipstick is going to come around. She will be the lunch. So put some bacon with lipstick on that!

Posted by: Linda | September 10, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Oh No …BIG GOVERNMENT! You mean the same BIG GOVERNMENT taking our tax dollars and fixing these atrocities created by people touting their EXECUTIVE experience?!!

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Go right ahead you Obams/Biden haters and women who can’t get over the fact Hillary lost and vote for Mcain/Palin. By doing so, you decide that citizens of this country get a $5,000 credit to pay for health insurance, decide what judges will be on the Supreme court, wipe out the middle class by supporting NAFTA. Go, right ahead. My vote will be for Obama/Biden.

Posted by: Dot | September 10, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Pants on fire Obama
“promised to run a different kind of campaign that focuses on delivering a different kind of government. In his campaign speeches, he emphasizes hope and crushing the cynicism that dominates current political thought.”

Posted by: Jackiean | September 10, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

I can not believe that this is even in the news. Talk about irresponsible journalism. Obama’s words have been taken completely out of context. I listed to Palins speech and to Obama’s- I don’t see any correlation between their two comments- she was comparing soccer moms to pitbulls and he was using an old saying to emphasize that McCain’s campaign is still the same old thing. If anything McCain’s campaign is sexist for attacking Obama for using the word “lipstick”. Obama has nothing to apologize for and any intelligent person should be able to see that.

Posted by: Disgusted in AZ | September 10, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Once again, the Republicans have managed to distract the media and focus their attention on totally meaningless, manufactured stories. I have been disturbed a lot by media coverage of this election, but this story takes the cake. After the glowing reaction to Palin and now this, I am truly discouraged by my nation. The media has dropped the ball, which is the beginning of the end for our democracy. FOCUS ON THE ISSUES, PLEASE!

Posted by: Joe W | September 10, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

This is getting ridiculous.

Posted by: mskayty | September 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Republican response to McCain’s comment is stupid and absurd just like stating that Palin’s has foreign policy experience because Alaska is near Russia. If Republicans believe it was directed against Palin tough. It really doesn’t matter….people know the expression is not out of the ordinary.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

The world is too complex for academic misfits to rule

Posted by: foolish | September 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Let’s get one thing straight people: Obama did NOT call Sarah Palin a pig. Nor did he call John McCain an old fish.
Read the transcripts. Drop the middle school mentality. America’s problems are too serious to harp on about this kind of silliness.
Posted by: spencer | Sep 10, 2008 9:34:05 AM
Thank you for your post spencer! I agree with you totally.

Posted by: J | September 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Typical tactics by the Republican party.
One only has to look back at their claims that:
1]Obama was making an issue of John McCain’s age when he said the McCain had “lost his bearings”.
2]Obama was playing the “race card”.
3]The media SO biased against Sarah Palin and that she won’t give interviews unless she is treated with “respect and deference” (and won’t even name a single media organization that they have an issue with except the National Enquirer).
Let’s face it, if the Democrats were doing the same thing the Republicans would just call them “whiners” and complain about why a VP candidate, who’s a heartbeat away from being President would be ducking interviews with less than 60 days left before the election.

Posted by: Steve | September 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

McPalin policies are “lipstick in a pig”

Posted by: wycliffe | September 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Senator Obama is a blithering disaster without a prepared text and a teleprompter. Can you imagine the result if he spoke to any Arab leader in such terms? But of course, we are to believe in his highly vaunted ‘judgment.’

Posted by: Russ | September 10, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

This is so ridiculous. The pitbull in lipstick will stop at nothing to work the sexist angle…I’m a Feminist. If the shoe fits.

Posted by: DonaldD | September 10, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I could give a crap about putting lipstick on a pig. I just know that it is becoming increasingly difficult for me to balance my practically nonexistent budget because we are in a recession, price of food is going up, we are in two wars with the possibility of a third (Afghanistan) and we there is the Georgia/Russia issues.
Obama is right. You can put lipstick on a pig and it is still a pig. I don’t care how you paint it. Based on the policies that McCain adopted to pursue over the course of the next four years, I can’t afford to take care of my kids and my older parents on my budget. I can’t. People are losing their homes and too many Americans are without healthcare. We need a change and it isn’t going to happen with McCain.
We cannot afford for the democrats to lose this election.

Posted by: dotheresearch | September 10, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Vote the issues, not the hype. For what ever reason some people are uncomfortable voting for a black man but can seem to admit that so they need a “reason” not to vote.
I am not voting for the Liar’s Club, my government has already lied to me far too many times.

Posted by: CAbear | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

All the republicans can do at this point is engage in the ridiculous to shift the subject away from their failures that have been compounding for 8 disastrous years. They can’t talk about the issues because their model of governance is a proven failure.

Posted by: sadsack | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

This has to be the single dumbest “news” story i have ever seen and all McCain supporters should be ashamed to be associated with this type of garbage…

Posted by: joe bob | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

I can’t believe how fast this campaign has gotten nasty & dirty!!! Now all the news media outlets can talk about is a “pig comment”!!! Its amazing to me that when McBlame says the SAME comment in regards to Hillary’s health care proposal NO ONE accused him of calling her a pig. But of course, NOW when OBAMA says the same comment, he’s accused of calling Palin a pig. YOU GOTTA BE KIDDING ME!!!!!!!!! Is this actually the behavior of rational mature adults or are we back in jr. high school? I just watched FOX/fix news and they’re actually implying that YES Obama meant to call her a pig while they convienently ommitted McShame’s same comment about Hillary. Now, that doesn’t surprise me at all of course since everyone knows how slanted they are to RepubliCaNs. But now every other media outlet is hopping on the same bandwagon. Lets be fair people! It seems to me we should have one rule. If Obama was calling Palin a pig, then McCain was calling Hillary Clinton one. If McCain wasn’t, then Obama wasn’t. End of story. Focus on the friggin’ issues and leave this childish crap on the playground!! We are being cheated people. Cheated out our 1 chance to REALLY make a difference in our children’s lives. McCain talks about change then turns around and hires Steve Schmidt to head his campaign. The same man who ran Bush’s campaign in ’00. The same man who was behind the smear campaign AGAINST MCCAIN in SC by suggesting his adopted black daughter was really his illegitimate love child!!! Does that matter to McShame? HELL NO!!! Its all about winning now and ALL the stops are being pulled out. Lets face it, at his age (72) this is his last shot at the Oval office and he’s going to do EVERYTHING to acheive his goal. Even run the kind of negative campaign he swore he wouldn’t. Even if it means using Karl Rove behind the scenes. After all, “Bush’s Brain” did such a great job beating him before, didn’t he???
Wake up people…Our country needs you to make the right choice! Eight is Enough!!!!!!

Posted by: Kimberly | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Go right ahead you Obams/Biden haters and women who can’t get over the fact Hillary lost and vote for Mcain/Palin. By doing so, you decide that citizens of this country get a $5,000 credit to pay for health insurance, decide what judges will be on the Supreme court, wipe out the middle class by supporting NAFTA. Go, right ahead. My vote will be for Obama/Biden.

Posted by: Dot | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Can the Republican Party look anymore foolish? Odd are, yes, they can. How silly.

Posted by: NancyW | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

RIGHT POLICIES…WRONG COLOR…WRONG GENDER…smh. If you can sleep easy at night that’s all that matters. Obama 08!

Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

If this lipstick issue insults women then women should be insulted with John McCain used against Hillary. Women who are insulted by this should be insulted because anyone who thinks that women are sensative about this are pretty stupid.

Posted by: kent3536 | September 10, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

oh, grow up, Sarah. you can tell lies about someone, you can self-aggrandize, and you can pretend to do something you didn’t, all to gain praise, but you can’t understand a phrase akin to “you can’t get blood from a turnip” or “you can’t make a silk purse from a sow’s ear”? grow up. you can’t have it both ways – you can’t play with the big boys *and* claim special privileges

Posted by: bajacalla | September 10, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

I can’t believe the stupid idiots who are claiming Obama was talking about Palin.This has gotten so bizarre and crazy.Get a life, PLEASE!!!

Posted by: Allen | September 10, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

I believe Obama is a sexist, Just look at the way he mistreated Hillary Clinton, he did not even have the common decency Vet her, even when it was crystal clear that she would have gladly accepted the bottom half of the ticket because she knew how much this would mean to the women of America. Now he is calling Governor Palin a pig? this is outrages, he should not be allowed to exploit women for his own personal gain. he is calling on Hillary to save his butt from Governor palin now. Why should she listen, Obama made a mockery of Bill and Hillary Clinton!

Posted by: dragonfly | September 10, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

I know many agree with me when i say I CANNOT WAIT for the debates to start. You deny press interview for Palin now but we’ll see how well “cliff notes for foreign policy” had served her the past two weeks when Biden WIPES the floor with her lipsticked gun toting self.
Amen!
time for truth to come out and debate the issues!
OBAMA BIDEN 2008

Posted by: voter in pa | September 10, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Obama needs to stop digging himself further into a hole. The race is between him and McCain, stay focus. I don’t think Obama was talking about Palin in regards to the lipstick comment but I have already heard some women talking about it and it’s not good. They’re adding the “sweetie” comment Obama called a woman reporter and the fact the he never attempted to vet Sen Clinton and wondering if he’s just using a womens right to choose which he brings up a lot as a political scam to get women.

Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | September 10, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Mc-Pal will not qualify to run for any office in any other country. Only in America will academic misfits aim to become president. God bless America

Posted by: foolish | September 10, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Fake outrage. How about responding to the point that proposing the same policies for the next four years that George Bush has promulgated for the last eight is not change no matter how much lipstick you put on it?

Posted by: Jon Lamont | September 10, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

“It’s about jobs. Jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs — a four-letter word,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday, discussing possible contents of a stimulus package.
She spoke just days after the government reported that the unemployment rate bolted to 6.1 percent in August, the highest rate in five years. Economists took the jump as a recession warning.
Also, business growth is slowing, food and energy prices remain high and the housing and financial markets remain distressed.
“While Obama is emphasizing the “lousy economy,” McCain is trying to divert attention to “the narrative of biography and character” of himself and his running mate, said Norm Ornstein, a political analyst with the American Enterprise Institute.
Republicans-with help of the GOP-controlled media-want to use their famous Weapons of Mass Distraction to try to limp their way into the White House.

Posted by: princess9681 | September 10, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

It’s clear the McCain camp enjoys insulting anyone and everyone, but when the tables are turned they want to break all the toys (not theirs) and run home crying. So it was acceptable when the GOP referred to Hillary Clinton as a pig in lipstick. Now in this instance, Obama wasn’t even referring to Palin, but the GOP is making issue of it anyway. Lipstick on a pig is dates back to biblical times and is actually in the bible. Although quoted differently. It refers to the fact that you can take a “swine. clean it up and dress it up with fine pearls, but the swine will always return to the mud.” Now, you’d think that since the McCain and Palin camp are soooooo religious and bible savvy they would immediately see the similarities. So much for for these so-called self righteous trying to fool everyone. The GOP claim to have balls, but all they know how to do is attack then cry fowl when anyone remotely calls them on it.

Posted by: Caint_Stand_Da_HeatQ | September 10, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

One of the very few things in which I disagree with Obama, is his confidence in the intellegence of the American people. I hope he is right, but during this stage of the election, we are acting like complete idiots. The Dems should HAMMER HOME the issues. ISSUES, ISSUES, ISSUES.

Posted by: WoodyIV | September 10, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Oh this is just stupid. The lipstick on a pig is an old line. So old that even John McCain used it. Obama didn’t say that Palins daughter was ugly the way McCain did about Chelsea Clinton. Things like this just make the MEDIA look foolish as well as the McCain campaign. For goodness sakes media, write about issues! Let people know where these men stand! Crap like this make you all look like you can’t be trusted to do your jobs!

Posted by: Suz in KS | September 10, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

I am sure these were pre-planned tactics by teh GOP when they selected Palin. They want to inject sexism and bias where it does not exist. they want to shelter the candidate from speaking on her own for fear they cannot script it. they want avoid press interviews with the news media, but lambast a talk show host who is not having ANY of the candidates on it during the election.
The GOP is scared of the truth and their real record of four more bush years that they wish to hide from the issues and cause the dialogue to shift to unimportant things.
Let Palin onto the View, let palin on Fox, CBS, ABC, NBC, etc. Let Bob Woodward interview her. Lets talk to the all those she fired or tried to fire who did not support her.
Lets hear from the REAL McCain and Palin! maybe they are just a wizard behind the curtain or jsut another “star” SIGNING AUTOGRAPHS AT

Posted by: scott jeffries | September 10, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

This is the sick thing. Anything that can possibly be taken out of context and twisted, as well as any substantive criticism of Palin whatsoever is going to be painted by the GOP attack machine and their lackies in the media as sexist. The saddest part is, many people out there are buying it, and in the process endangering the future of this country.

Posted by: CW of Eugene | September 10, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

whatever Maccain is doing,
Obama/Biden will win this election.
Cell phone only users are very much underestimated in the poll.
And now, 20 percent of voters are cell phone only users.
And 60 percent of cell phone only users are obama supporters.
some polling include them. but they select only 7 percent of registered voters which is not representing the reality of 2008.
so don’t be surprised on Nov.4th.

Posted by: zen | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Problem is his audience thought he was referring to Governor Palin and cheered him on–he did nothing to correct their misimpression. It appears civil discourse is no longer possible in this country.
The majority of people I’ve spoken with believe Senator Obama was speaking directly about Governor Palin. Even if not true, the fact that people so easily and willingly believe it is true speaks volumes about how people perceive Senator Obama having behaved towards Governor Clinton.
Further, even if he wasn’t referring to Governor Palin, the onus is on Senator Obama to be exceedingly cautious in his word choices. After a primary season where he gave great offense to women voters and did not even vet Senator Clinton to be VP, he should be walking on eggs to be cautious. Looks to me like he just stepped in it big time.
Finally, Jake, I like your blog, but your extreme efforts to turn this in to a non-issue and your silence on the media’s hit on Governor Palin finally gives away your bias. You’re not the neutral we believed you to be.

Posted by: Chad3337 | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

firebreather – you’re right we need some answers from Obama the precious. The MSM Obama lovefest has prevented getting answers to any real questions regarding his character and his questionable friends. It was Feb. before the MSM revealed Obama’s crazy old “uncle” Rev. Wright. It took Obama 700+ days to appear in an interview on Fox with Mike Wallace. Yet now all we hear is how Palin is being hidden by the campaign and won’t do interviews. What a joke!! We STILL ARE WAITING for answers on Obama’s character. Since Obama will only agree to 3 debates (after saying “anytime/anywhere”), we can only hope that one of the moderators will ask him some tough questions about all of the smoke surrounding him i.e. Rezko, Ayers, Auchi, Odinga, but somehow I doubt it with all of the liberal MSM kid glove treatment. Double standards abound for Obama once again.

Posted by: fairelection2008 | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

When I was in college twenty years ago, I took a journalism course as an elective. We were taught in that Journalism 101 class to always be objective and never inject our own opinion. Maybe CBS should consider firing all of its “journalists” and replacing them with people who just report the news. This biased report is pathetic and is the type of yellow journalism that just makes people draw even closer to McCain and Palin. Keep up the good work CBS, ABC and NBC, you’ll get McCain elected yet!

Posted by: Tyler | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I am truly offended by Mr. Obama’s comment about lipstick on a pig. All women, black and white, should be offended at this sexist remark. The men of America should be offended by this remark! Again we get a glimpse of Obama’s true colors – no apology or backsliding required, Mr. Obama because you won’t be believed. America needs to wake up to the REAL Obama.

Posted by: Liz | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Lets see what are the issues now? A Republican tax cut that resulted in a historic transfer of wealth from the lower and middle classes up to the wealthiest 5% of the population. Administrative policies that caused middle class jobs to be lost, while the buying power of those whom retained employment were diminished. For a decade people’s earning power could not keep pass with the rising costs of living. An economy that focused increasingly on the production and marketing of luxury goods for the benefit of the very wealthy, as the majority of the population were increasingly unable to afford to buy even the bear essentials of life. A national state of both public and private rising indebtedness that continued to grow as the Nation moved ever closer to public and private insolvency. A credit and banking industry that collapsed like a house of cards, causing speculation that lead to a stock market collapse of historic proportions…Oh but I’m sorry, did you think I’m talking about today? No my friends, I’m talking of the last “WEEKS” before the great depression hit!!!! That is the issue now! Not lipstick on pigs! Those who dare to talk of such nonsense are throwing up a smoke screen to confuse us into voting against our own self-interest! It is probably already to late to save us from the next “Republican induced Great Depression”, but we can at least choose the “Medicine” that will over time will cure us, rather than the “Poison”, that will result in the dawn of a new age of Feudalism for all of humanity!!!! What we need now, is a new FDR!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Republicans and its media are trying to divert the debate into a petty slung show between Obama vs Palin so people forget their real problems that are Economy, Home Forclosures,Unemployment, Education, Healthcare, Broken Military, Debts and Deficits, so forth…
This “incorrect agenda” is very convenient to the guilty republicans claiming to bring even change after Bush administration. The “correct agenda” instead would speak for itself and people of America would know beyond any doubt who to vote for.

Posted by: Raphael48 | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Why is the DNC even mentioning Palin? She is only a well chosen diversion from the important issues. The GOP did another great job of diverting everyone’s attention. Face it, no one is going to dissuade the die-hard Dems or Repubs from their respective choice. The candidates’s target should be undecided voters who should be presented with REAL issues and facts.
I have been a registered Independent since 1971 and have tried to remain impartial but have come to the conclusion that the GOP has lied to me consistently over the past 37 years. Cambodia, Watergate (Nixon) Delayed Iranian hostage release, Iran/Contra arms, Taliban training against Russia, Savings and Loans debacle (Reagan), Desert Storm for Oil (after U.S.’s implied consent for Hussein to enter disputed Kuwait/Iraq border), “Read my Lips-No new taxes” (Bush Senior), WMDs, Supreme court election, “Swiftboating” “Loyalty Pledges, (Bush Jr.)
The GOP is the party of hate and lies and yes Clinton was less than truthful but “Nobody died when Clinton Lied”.
Come on undecideds! Research these actions and base your decisions on historical facts, not current spin!

Posted by: AlaskanDude | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Posted by: Jim Rod | Sep 10, 2008 9:31:13 AM – You twist and then object to what Obama said, and then accuse Obama and hence the rest of us of terrorism? You are the mind and voice of all republicans.

Posted by: Sanity Man | September 10, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Mr. Tapper,
You’ve done it again. You’re an expert.
By putting a lot of text between two sentences that were delivered together, you’ve managed to misrepresent what was originally said. This time, though, you inserted your analysis clearly.

Posted by: damix austex | September 10, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

This is more crap from the GOP; it’s prvoen that McCain has used the same phrase. Can they spell “hypocrisy”? Probably not. Didn’t Jesus say something about watching out for hypocrites? Americans should insist on a higher standard of debate. On the issues, the Repubs are morally bankrupt.

Posted by: anotherpatricia | September 10, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

The McCain campaign is being terribly disingenous in their complaints and their new ad. Listening to the video, it’s clear Obama was talking about how McCain’s policies are being dressed up as something different…as “change”. The “pig in lipstick” metaphor is a legit phrase to use when describing what the McCain campaign is doing.
Palin has pointed out that Hillary’s whining about being criticized isn’t doing women any good. I agree and I’d also add that the McCain campaign is overplaying the “sexism” card as this latest example is ridiculous and not doing women any good either. They are going to belittle the claim of sexism so much that when REAL sexism happens, it won’t carry any weight.
I’d tell McCain-Palin what my grandma used to tell us when my sister and I were complaining about being picked on…”it’s time to put on your big girl panties and quit whining!”

Posted by: Cicely | September 10, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Obama has a pattern of being disrespectful to women. Remember how he did Hillary with those little comments. He certainly has a thing against any woman who gets in his way. Look how Joe Biden said that odd comment about his wife when he introduced her the day Obama announced he was his running mate.
I think this shows what the man is. He sure is not presidential. As much as President Bush has been attacked by the left and their supporters, he has never went that low to say these things that Obama has said. Think about that.

Posted by: Christie | September 10, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Hey Dems…
DO NOT let the repubs HIDE behind the feminism argument while palin continues to attack. This is what the repubs are counting on. Treat her just like ANY OTHER OPPONENT!!!
If she wants to stomp with the big dogs……she has to take her lumps to.
STAY ON THE ATTACK DEMS. The repubs can’t STAND being on defense.

Posted by: Order | September 10, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Amazing how the Reptilian, eh I mean Republican, machine continues to use outright lies and exaggeration to confuse the facts.
This phrase has been used enumerable times by both parties representatives. Maybe the repubs should be excoriating Palin’s speech writers for having her call herself a female dog. She did you know. Did she know the sentence was in there before she read it? Of course, she practiced for two days on that joke of a speech.

Posted by: idea logical | September 10, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Julia, great comment!
——————
Obama and McCain statements are not the same at all. The big difference is that when McCain made the statement, his complete sentence included the term ‘proposal’ so it was clear that McCain’s comment referred to “the healthcare proposal”, and it was not referring to a person. On the other hand, on Obama’s video and it seems a sexist slur. For one thing, Obama made the remark in a standalone way, with his speech cadence of his prior paragraph, there is a clear pause prior to his slur. Now he says it referred to ‘change’ but that doesn’t make sense because ‘change’ is an inanimate object and we all know you can’t put lipstick on some inanimate object. And he thinks we are stupid??? Now Obama refused to even apologize for derogatory slights of this nature for a comment that was overwhelmingly misunderstood by many, than he is a lesser man than I thought. Let me be clear, his kind of immature rhetoric needs to be kept far, far away from the whitehouse. He is divisive. and getting really boring too.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

HE doesn’t owe her anything. I say the gloves should have come off after she became the “attack dog with lipstick” at the RNC. She had a lot to say then however when he makes this comment about a pig wearing lipstick, obviously talking about the fact that McCain is trying to use different wording for the same broken policies and calling it “Reform” then the Dems are being too hard on her or sexist…Puleeeeeze. If she can’t take the heat she needs to get out the kitchen.

Posted by: Courtney | September 10, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

What an idiot! To use a colloquial expression, Obama screwed the pooch this time! Does he really think his comment–clearly alluding to Governor Palin in light of her recent lipstick joke–is the way to “win friends and influence people?” NOT! All the sexist stuff they played on Hillary isn’t going to work this time around.

Posted by: anne1244 | September 10, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

I’m convinced the McCain campaigners will use anything concievable to their advantage, including childish and dirty tactics. If they were to claim that Obama is not playing by the rules because he is actually from the planet Neptune, 75% or more of Republican supporters would endorse this position and begin swearing by it.
It’s mindless, it’s stupid, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with the very serious problems our country is facing.
Name calling. Sheesh. Are you people really adults?

Posted by: Aaron | September 10, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Wake up folks! The mortgage crisis is sinking our financial markets and we’re not even around the corner on the credit-card crisis looming. In short our economy is tanking and that should be the first thing we should all worry about as a country?
All the red-herring from the McSame and camp about distracting us with the “pig soundbite” will not put food on the table and jobs in your hands.
A concerned American.

Posted by: LaughingInCali | September 10, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

This is ridiculous. The McCain campaign can’t win on issues, so McCain is hiding behind Palin’s skirt.
Some maverick.

Posted by: MKoch | September 10, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Palin can’t have it both ways, saying she is a pitt bull, but then crying sexism or bullying anytime someone points out one of her lies or exaggerations or lack of experience!!! Remember, Obama was in the US senate, folks, and serving on the foreign relations committee while she was a sportscaster. Why do you think she hasn’t allowed any hard core interviews? Because she’s NOT READY!!!
She couldn’t even state correctly how Fanny May and Freddie Mac are funded. And the economy is a major issue!
She’s not a pig, she’s a FOOL!
As an older white woman, I am appalled that women are flocking to her liek pigs in mud. Don’t they realize that she will hold back women’s causes a hundred years? And I’m not just talking abortion here, I’m talking about funding and reforming education, about healthcare, about scientific advances against disease, and social security.
Who do you think started social security? The Democrats, folks!
Stop judging people by what they look like and dig down to the real issues. Do you really want more oil spills? Do you want someone in the White House who doesn’t believe we had zip to do with global warming?
I say if you vote Palin and McCain in, well, then, YOU’RE the pigs and fools and dolts, and you’ll get what you deserve.
Obama & Biden in 08.
It’s about a clean energy future and real strength which comes from vision and thoughtful process, not just killing, killing, killing. McCain can get all the soldiers killed for the “victory” but what the heck is going to do in the region afterwards. He has no clue because he has no vision. He doesn’t even know when the surge occurred (he misquoted when teh awakening and the surge occured), or the borders between Iraq and Afghanistan, or that Chekeslovakia hasn’t been a country for some time now. He mixes up his facts. Do you want him to mix up which button calls for the bomb?
Get with it!
Wake UP!

Posted by: CatherineS | September 10, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Do NOT apologize to this woman or campaign. This is so incredibly transparant. “If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it is a duck”. Oh wait, sorry, Palin and McCain, I didn’t mean to call you a duck. How insane. Really, can Americans really be this stupid to buy into what the Republicans are saying. To use one of Palin’s overused lines, “I’m saying, thanks, but no thanks” to McCain/Palin.

Posted by: NancyW | September 10, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

zen – if polls can not be taken from cell phone only users, first how do you know 20% of people only have cell phones and better yet how do you know 60% of them support Obama?
Now I know Obama is probably the most dangerous person to run for President, but part of me thinks this was more of a slip, he is upset and angry that he is falling behind and he used an old joke with bad timing
What about Biden’s sexist comments? Is Obama going to fire him?

Posted by: spock | September 10, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Posted by: Liz | Sep 10, 2008 9:45:32 AM – You like McCain just don’t get it. The phrase doesn’t lessen women it says that you can’t take someting less than a woman and make it as great as a woman. GET IT?

Posted by: Sanity Man | September 10, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

rkb: You know, if Obama didn’t have a track record of condescension towards female opponents you might persuade me on this one…..Totally agree. When both videos are watched start of speech to finish, McCain’s comment was clearly about a proposal…and Obama’s was about…oh, his supporters should check with their local media DNC spokesman what we should believe…

Posted by: Hockeymomma | September 10, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Hi valerie j.
It takes two to tango.
I was pointing to what(in my mind) was the latest big bang that started this era of uncooperativeness.
Before Florida and the Supreme Court, we were almost civil.

Posted by: Tom - small town Indiana | September 10, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Seriously? Um… what about all the mean things they said about Obama in which they said “Obama is this that or the other” Obama wasn’t callign her a pig and you stupid women (and men for that matter) that believe he was need to get your heads checked. McCain has said **** ***** and oh wait “put lipstick on a pig” so why is this a sexist comment? Um because its not and it wasn’t.
How come Palin can lie and lie and lie some more but this is what your getting crazy hyper over!

Posted by: Becky | September 10, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Republicans are getting pathetic and hypocritical beyond belief. Have you people no shame? Maybe he should have referred to a woman’s genitals and then MCain could have patted him on the back.

Posted by: Walter Lee | September 10, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

I will be voting for McCain this November, but have to say that it is wrong to accuse Obama of smearing Palin with his comments. The phrase he used is one I’ve heard for decades. While I know that politicians use very crafted wording to create both positive and negative images and that the use of the word lipstick might have been a calculated attempt to make the public draw a connection with her, I have to recognize that Obama was addressing a specific topic and was expressing an opinion on it. Whatever suspicions there may be about his intent, he did not make any direct statements about Mrs Palin.

Posted by: F4RIDER | September 10, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Obama didn’t call Palin a pig but nice to know McCain thought he was referring to her.

Posted by: Brenda | September 10, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

McCain camp plays the gender card. Calls lipstick comment “Offensive and Disgraceful”
Maybe the women voters should be reminded how McCain speaks to his wife in public.

Posted by: C Wilton | September 10, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Does anyone honestly care what McBush has to say? I mean really? Who cares.

Posted by: Rappa Zing | September 10, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Now we want to dissect in which the term was used. “lip stick on a pig” is still “lip stick on a pig”. No matter how you slice it.
All of sudden the GOP wants to be sensitive …Obama doesn’t have to apologize for jack!

Posted by: TW | September 10, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Sure Obama and Biden will be elected … when pigs fly.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 10, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Remember the “he’s lost his bearings” remark?
Good grief.
“WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT?! ARE YOU CALLING HIM OLD?! ARE YOU SAYING HE’S LOST HIS MARBLES?!
Again – petty, childish, and distracts from real political debate.

Posted by: Aaron | September 10, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Lipstick on a trainwreck.
Obama doens’t look like he can take the pressure. That worries me if he becomes president.
I thought Obama was supposed to be a skilled orator. He doesn’t talk any better than George Bush.

Posted by: John | September 10, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Well, jeez, Palin compared herself to a DOG. The only reason Palin is on the ticket is that the RNC thinks that they’ll get the pissed off Hillary supporters. They are stupid enough to think that just having a woman on the ticket will get the votes. Anybody with an ounce of sense will look at Palin and wonder why in the world she’s in line to be the leader of the free world. She was the mayor of a town of 5000. Now that makes her qualified? How? She’s on the ticket because she is a SHE. No other reason.

Posted by: BigT | September 10, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

McCain and Palin need to just let this drop.
Obama is clearly rattled and not handling the pressure of being behind very well.
At worst, he was trying to be cute in twisting Palin’s famous Hockey Mom / Pitbull statement.
At best, he just showed the kind of bad judgment that we would expect from him.

Posted by: Terry | September 10, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

“I have a fourth-grader and two second-graders at home,” [Former Gov Jane Swift - GOP] said. “I would not teach them that this is sort of a high-minded debate on policy issues when they are calling people rotten old fish or a pig. In fact, it sounds a lot like some of the least intelligent debates on the playground sound like at our elementary school.”
I’m so glad that Mrs. Swift has found a job with McCain and not at my daughter’s school.

Posted by: John | September 10, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Surely a man smart enough to be elected president should have foreseen how these remarks would be taken. Don’t Harvard law grads know the impact of words?

Posted by: John | September 10, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Now that I’m reading through the comments, I see that people have taken this article to be both for and against Obama. So let me clarify: Obama meant it this way: “Sarah Palin is a pig.”
This man, with his terrorist, anti-American, criminal ties, and his horrible character and judgment, should be nowhere near the White House. If you love America, you will not vote for Barack Obama. This is coming from a life-long Democrat. He and his wife are a dangerous duo, and they will bring this country down so fast, it will make your head spin.

Posted by: Alex | September 10, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

“Let us make the frenzied media assault our WAKE UP CALL that if we do not take action now we will lose this election. Let the attacks of the elite media on this special woman be constantly remembered and rally us to victory.
Many (especially older voters) are fooled by the supposedly unbiased anchors. When we listen to the elite media and see their comments. These are the people who vetted Obama with the same tenacity as a mother vetting her child. In contrast we all watched as the elite media salivated like wolves snarling and slashing at the Governor and her little daughter before Governor Palin’s speech. Then immediately after the speech (when they had gathered the entire pack for the vetting kill of “this woman”), we saw fear on their faces. They had that undeniable acute depressive look of a bad cop caught with his hand on the throat of an innocent woman.
Some in the media had the integrity to apologize and some (like Olberman and The “hard ball” liberal were fired but others (like the CNN crowd) are unrepentant and now they are reuniting the pack. Like herd out of a Thomas Kuhn novel they are intellectuality rationalizing their abhorrent behavior and reforming as would a clutch of corrupt policemen.
The pundits on both sides are excused –they admit their bias but these “Journalists” are like a doctor who prescribes you a drug without telling you he/she is getting a kickback! For all those professionals who use the public trust to advance their own agenda— the Olberman firing is your wake up call–that one is for you!!
We must recognize that the founders of America never planned for a biased media with a stranglehold on most of the news America reads and sees. The field is unbalanced yet we must win, in part because those who unbalanced this election must not be allowed to prevail. All of us must dig deeper to support Senator McCain and Gov. Palin. Get involved NOW and/or send as much as you can afford NOW –The media is doing their best to elect their chosen one –lets all do our part ASAP. Dealing with Media bias is like dealing with a corrupt police force –they will always self justify. They will not fix themselves. Go to the McCain site and get involved and/o donate as much as you can afford today. Let’s get America back and show for all of history that in America the media cannot anoint our leaders.
***Again enough talk– the field is unequivocally unlevel–Go to the McCain site and get involved and/o donate as much as you can afford today.***

Posted by: grenadierboy | September 10, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

So McCain can say it about Clinton and it’s ok. Obama says it about GOP “Change” and it’s sexist.
The GOP are truly the bottom feeders of politics.

Posted by: Jason | September 10, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

You know, can we should think about this.
Some people are saying that Obama should have picked Hillary, he’d certainly win more easily.
Shouldn’t that SAY SOMETHING about Obama if he DIDN’T do that? Picking Hillary could smooth him an EASIER path to the White House, but he CHOSE not to do that. Why? Maybe because he places the country, not winning an election first! Because some of Hillary’s views contradict his, and she would have to immediately fall in line- and she wouldn’t seem genuine then-that wouldn’t be good for Hillary or Obama. Because Joe Biden can make up alot for foreign policy experience in the long run.
McCain, on the other hand, has proudly proclaimed he would rather lose the election then lose a war, that he places his country first. Well then, why did he rope in Ms Palin in an attempt to energize his Republican base and keep on flip-flopping on issues? If he placed his country first, he would have factored in the possibility he is not able to complete his term and chosen a veep more people knew and was more experienced.

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

The GOP is just using this to their advantage. There is nobody in the campaign that REALLY believes Obama was talking about Palin…it’s just useful to them in their never-ending quest to be as malicious in this campaign as possible. And they should stop being hypocrits. These are the same people who allowed the sale of bogus dollar bills with a less-than-flattering likeness of Obama on them AT THEIR CONVENTION. They can disavow themselves from the garbage on the internet, but we all know they love it because it feeds a perception, albeit completely false, that works for them. As for Palin, she’s interviewing for the top job in the country and was cleverly intro’d to us with under 60 days until the election. All 3 other candidates have been vetted by everyone, incl the media…especially the media….over months and years. We don’t have the luxury of time with her, but she’s interviewing for the same job. This means everything she stands for, her record, her policy, her beliefs, are absolutely fair game when it comes to educating the public before the election. Nobody in the media is talking about her family at this point, but they should be talking about the fact that her stump speech hasn’t changed by even a single word, she’s still telling untruths on a daily basis as part of said stump speech (despite the entire media having debunked this), and she still isn’t allowed to answer questions from the media or take interview questions. She speaks on the stump and is summarily rushed to the car and they leave. As an American, I think we’re owed more information than that. I don’t care that she’s a woman. I’m a woman. She’s a candidate for the highest office in the land, and she can’t cry sexism and ask for deferential treatment at the same time. You can’t have it both ways. I am on the fence in terms of where my vote will go, but I can tell you I won’t vote Republican unless all my questions have been answered and I have a full 360 view of what makes this woman tick. So far, she’s not allowing us to have that and that campaign is using her gender as an excuse. As Obama would say…”enough!!”

Posted by: Debbie Reid | September 10, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

The comment was not an insult directed at Palin, it was an insult directed at John McCain. Palin is the lipstick; McCain is the pig.

Posted by: Jim in Mich | September 10, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

She said pit bull not pig. He opened his mouth to put her down. Anyone that can defend him is as bad as letting a little kid continue to get away with bad behavior. He’s older, big difference. This is not acting presidential. Get real Obama lovers.

Posted by: Christie | September 10, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Given Obama’s audience’s reaction to his comment, if he did not in fact mean it as a slight to Palin, he should have immediatelly cleared the air and explained that he intend to allude to her. Instead he reveled in the moment and kept talking.
The man is scared, for the first time he is behind in the polls and is in the same shoes Hillary Clinton was in for so much of the primary.

Posted by: TexasDem | September 10, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

So Palin gets to mock Obama’s stint as a community organizer (People come in and clean up communities after government FAILS them), but Obama doesn’t get to call her out?
I say BS, folks.
If Palin is a so-called pitt bull, then she should be able to handle some hard play.
She can’t have it both ways.
And if she thinks that’s rough, just wait until Biden debates her on October 2nd. His grasp of foreign policy and every detail and vision for the future will blow her out of her little stinky fish pond.
Get your hands on a copy of last week’s Meet the Press if you want to hear a true expert talk.
Obama & Biden 08

Posted by: CatherineS | September 10, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Thanks, Jake! The GOP is getting paranoid and hysterical, and so are their followers, about this! It’s a very old expression, McCain used it previously, and Obama used it appropriately!! It has nothing to do with gender or Palin, and this staged victimization of Palin is an insult to intelligent women and voters everywhere! How stupid!

Posted by: Deb S | September 10, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I can’t believe the McCain campaign is going this low to try and win, this is pathetic and I have lost respect for McCain, he doesn’t deserve to win, this is the same old politics that got Bush elected!

Posted by: Kathy | September 10, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

“John McCain says he’s about change too, and so I guess his whole angle is, ‘Watch out George Bush — except for economic policy, health care policy, tax policy, education policy, foreign policy and Karl Rove-style politics — we’re really going to shake things up in Washington,’” he said.
“That’s not change. That’s just calling something the same thing something different. You know you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig. You know you can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change, it’s still going to stink after eight years. We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”
THAT’S what the desperate GOP is whining about? lol!

Posted by: Lee-Usa | September 10, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Now this is just plain bickering! I defended Palin when attacks were geared towards her family. I heard what Sen Obama said in detail and did not feel like it was directed towards Gov. Palin. Read the transcript. As a solid republican supporter I must agree that it is a cheap use of the sexist card by the republican party. Do research and you will find it is common Washington verbage also used by McCain at one point. Lets grow up and wait to hear what she has to say on her views and direction of the country. Lets not play the victims when we are just as much to blame on scrutiny of our opponents! To be frank bickering like this and playing victim is really turning me and alot of other McCain/Palin supporters off. It is getting to the point that sheerly the media and our opponents feel like they are walking on thin ice when mentioning her. Almost as if she is untouchable. Republican strategy and tactics are getting old and boring. We are gonna lose to dems because of this. Lets grow up and stick to facts. C’mon….Thanks!

Posted by: Jussie | September 10, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Do you think Ms. Palin will be standing up today and lying – again – for her man?
What’s it going to take for this woman to realize McCain has had women around all his life doing the dirty work for him.
Palin, you’re just the next one in line.
Wake up!!!

Posted by: newz4i | September 10, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Oh brother, Someone save us. Have we no more important thing to do than make this important political campaign into a degenerate mud-slinging, babyish name-calling fight that insults EVERYONE on both sides? I am so disgusted that I don’t know what to do. I am ashamed at what the presidential campaign has become. How do we really register distaste and disappointment with the whole situation?

Posted by: AlexSiwek | September 10, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

If the shoe fits…… Unbelievable that people buy in to the republican campaign tactics. Answer me this McSame devotees: For those of you making less than $200,000 per year, what have the Bush economic policies done to improve your life? The republican party simply USES the socioeconomic strata of this country. They raise issues that have absolutely no bearing on people’s lives and – trough constant repitition – manipulate the uneducated in this nation. WAKE UP! The republican machine cares about one thing and one thing only – MONEY. They don’t give a tinker’s damn about the average working class American family.

Posted by: dano | September 10, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Given Obama’s audience’s reaction to his comment, if he did not in fact mean it as a slight to Palin, he should have immediatelly cleared the air and explained that he did not intend to allude to her. Instead he reveled in the moment and kept talking.
The man is scared, for the first time he is behind in the polls and is in the same shoes Hillary Clinton was in for so much of the primary.

Posted by: TexasDem | September 10, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

McCain himself used the phrase more than once, including last year, when he was talking about Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s 1990s health care plan. He said last October, “I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.”
So….the big deal McCain having now is ____? Is his senility worse than we’re being told?

Posted by: Lee-Usa | September 10, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

This is just all silliness. McSame can use the phrase but Obama can’t. McSame is the slippery pig who is running a most dishonorable and SLEAZY campaign. We Americans do NOT deserve this kind of campaign. But alas this is the only kind of campaign the Republicans know. Forget the issues… let’s smear the hell out of the opposition. Obama WILL prevail. He WILL be our next President. HE WILL BE THE BEST PRESIDENT OF THE MODERN AGE. Go back to your crypt McSame and the Moose hunter can go back to the Alaska deep freeze and deal with teh consequences of her her corruption in her state administration.

Posted by: upstatenydude | September 10, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

So if Obama owes Palin an apology, then I guess McCain owes Hillary one..for using “THESE EXACT WORDS” when referring last Oct to Hillary’s healthcare plan….the ONLY one playing sexism in this campaign is McCain!!!!

Posted by: JET | September 10, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Is this really any worse than Rudy and Palin laughing openly at Obama’s community work? Come on! That is far more insulting. I think Obama should have added “you can’t polish a ****” to his Bush presidency descriptions!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 10, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

As a person who works in government, I don’t know how politics have become a game of lies. Don’t tell the truth about your opponent because Americans are to lazy to discover the truth about what a particular canidate espouses. We have had a President everyone says they can drink a beer with, now we want a Vice-President. As Americans, have we stoop to mediocrity, we always wanted the best and the brightest to lead our country…now that doesn’t matter. I liked Bill and Hillary. I was basically just starting into the work world, but if we know the country is in bad shape and Americans are going to vote for someone just because they are a women or have a women on the ticket or African Amercan then America deserves to sink a little bit lower. Barack is just a few years younger than me and sooner or later the torch has to be passed. Lying to the American people and calling it “politics” is Wrong. I have two daughters one in college and one in high school. They deserve better.

Posted by: Willie in NC | September 10, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

“We don’t need to be victims to win.” Then why are you playing that card? Just wait until Putin calls her a nasty name.

Posted by: Walter Lee | September 10, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Biden’s comments about special needs tells his views on stem cell research and Obama’s comments about McCain being more of the same (same Bush policies) is just that. They’ve given you guys a lot of latitude on teen pregnancy, Palin’s crazy religious views and have tried to discuss politics. Why? I suppose they’re more capable and have a message. I guess the GOP just isn’t as capable.
One more thing, the media is doing a crack job of focusing on “My Muslim faith” and taking it out of context. What would be great is if the media spent more time trying to focus on the issues, too. Palin’s crazy religious views I disagree with personally, but it doesn’t disqualify her from the job. Why can’t you determine if she’s been fiscally responsible about the plane she sold on e-bay (sold at a loss, because she couldn’t sell it on e-bay), a renovation to a mansion that she hardly ever used, McCain’s record about him voting with Bush 90% of the time (Obama could be wrong), Obama’s stint as a community organizer, etc. Those are the issues and its sad that the media’s investigative journalism has slipped to National Inquirer level reporting.

Posted by: Tami | September 10, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Sarah Palin is not a pitbull. She is a weenie who plays the victim card. When she is President, she might as well tell the terrorists that an attack on America is very, very sexist, and shame on them. Man, her whining is intolerable.

Posted by: FilmMD | September 10, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

ok, we all better leave Obama alone. Give him another pass after what he did to Mrs. Clinton with his finger. Come on, don’t won’t to see him cry. Poor baby. She said pitbull not pig.

Posted by: Christie | September 10, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Obama needs to clarify his comment.
Palin is not the pig. Palin is the lipstick. She told you so herself.

Posted by: me | September 10, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

We can’t really be having this debate. Has anybody ever heard of metaphors, similes,hyperbole, etc? What were the real comparisons here? If we are too dumb to figure it out, then we shouldn’t even be in this discussion

Posted by: marco benavides | September 10, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Absolute pure grandstanding on a grand scale by every republican and fake Democrat here. The only reason you are making a mountain out of “nothing” is because you have nothing else to talk about that will make a single point on the real issues. I am amazed at the child-like behaviour of all of you. Pure childishness. Grow up people.

Posted by: dlboggan | September 10, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Obama is self destructing and this was an obvious slur to anyone with a brain. He caleld Palin a Pig and McCain a stinkiy old fish.
Obama is going down like the titanic and you liberals know it. You are scared to death of Palin and have to resort to childish smears about her family and background.
I can’t wait till November 4, 2008.
GO MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: FEDUP | September 10, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

This is beyond pathetic!!!! Get back to the issues the GOP does not want to do this and i understand as they have nothing but such pathetic things to do but as for the DEMS i dont even get them …go back to the issues. And those of you who claim Obama has no respect for women just look at how he treats his wife unlike mcCain who call his wife names. Plus their stance on womens rights

Posted by: angela | September 10, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

The McCain campaign are the sexist they are the ones that chose Palin only after they knew that Obama had not chosen Hillary.They are the ones that are using Palin as a sheild to now cry foul.I know that Palin is being used,by the GOP and so do alot of others he hurried to pick her so that he could say look I can be different all though it is a farce.They know that Obama wasn’t referencing Palin when he made the statement about lipstick, but now they can cry like little boys beacause they can make it sound as if she is constantly being attacked.That is the reason that she was the chosen one,they are the ones being sexist.

Posted by: damehen | September 10, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

If the GOP gets an apology for this old school saying, then I would like Gov. Palin and all of those who attended the GOP convention (and duly laughed and cheered at said comment) to issue an apology to the millions of folks who work as community organizers, volunteers, agents of change in their community. Oh yes, and I would like an apology for being called a liberal and an Eastern Elitest just because I live in the Northeast and was Ivy League educated…I paid a lot of money and worked my tail off for that degree.

Posted by: Sus888 | September 10, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I think the debates will but a lot of this talk to rest. Governor Palin has some explaining to do and looking cute is not going to be good enough.
There’s a big difference between Alaska and the lower states and she won’t be able to HUNT her way to the white house.

Posted by: voter100 | September 10, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

For the last week I kept thinking that there was something about miss Palin that I could’nt put my finger. Thank you Mr Obama .
Seriously though, I think the fact that miss Palin considered banning books that might be against what she supports should be of really great concern to everyone. This is someone who can assume the position of most powerful person in the world.
McCain seems to have lost it when he selected her as his running mate. Is McCain , like GW Bush only thinking of his place in history — a decorated war veteran who became the president of the US??? This is what it looks like.

Posted by: Oink Oink | September 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

So the pit-bull’s whimpering now? If you can’t take the heat, go back to Alaska!

Posted by: whymelord | September 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

IF HE MEANT IT OR NOT, IT SHOWS HOW STUPID HE IS.

Posted by: CHAOS | September 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Hillary save your career and stay far away from Obama the sexist pig, I hope you run in 2012

Posted by: firebreather26 | September 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Scotty, beam me up please! There are no intelligent life forms here!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

The republicans have become shrill and hysterical.
They have truly lost their minds.
They must know that they have lost.

Posted by: Patty | September 10, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Obama is showing his level of intelligence in his campaign to be sure. He opens his mouth without thinking about what he is saying or the consequences of his actions….. quite often too it appears.
His remarks show his moral standards and his true colors. I am outraged that he has not apologized to Sarah Palin- who has referred to herself by saying the things that separates a hockey mom (which she is) from a pitbull dog, is lipstick… come on people!
Obama is still trying to get America to choke down his sugar-coated garbage. And I for one, won’t stand for it!
Concerned Proud American,
~Sanaya

Posted by: Sanaya | September 10, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

It is pretty clear Obama was speaking to the McBush attempt to re-package old Bush policies, which is a pig-in-a-poke. And lipstick won’t change it.
Besides she referred to herself as a dog with her lipstick joke.

Posted by: SDindependent | September 10, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

It is pretty clear Obama was speaking to the McBush attempt to re-package old Bush policies, which is a pig-in-a-poke. And lipstick won’t change it.
Besides she referred to herself as a dog with her lipstick joke.

Posted by: SDindependent | September 10, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Speaking of hypocrisy, how can John McCain and Sarah Palin be both anti-choice and pro death penalty? They both purport to be deeply religious, but they only comply with “thou shalt not kill” when it is politically expedient! It’s time to get away from conservative hypocrisy. Vote Obama!

Posted by: tired of 8 years of lies | September 10, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

victory said: “he says it referred to ‘change’ but that doesn’t make sense because ‘change’ is an inanimate object and we all know you can’t put lipstick on some inanimate object”
Are you kidding me?! People use the ‘putting lipstick on pig’ phrase all the time when referring to inanimate objects. In fact, most of the time it’s used to address inanimate objects or situations.
At my work it’s common to say use that phrase when talking about a project or situation that is bad…when the managers are trying to “change” the perception of a bad project or situation by attempting to to dress it up for the customer or their bosses. Maybe victory needs to get out more.
It’s very clear that Obama is talking about McCain’s policies. He names them and says that they are now trying to present them as “change”. THAT is what Obama’s was talking about.

Posted by: Cicely | September 10, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Yes, McCain used the same phrase, to Republican laughs, referring to Hillary Clinton’s policies. This is more GOP posturing and dirty tricks! The rest of us understand Obama’s meaning and context, and it had nothing to do with women or Palin! It means the same as when McCain said it, for Pete’s sake!!!

Posted by: Deb S. | September 10, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

This is what the Repubs want the American people to be focusing on instead of focusing on the issues. I would suggest to all those out there with good common sense to STOP responding to this blog because it’s only feeding into the distraction that the Republican party enjoys!!! Obama should not apologize because the statement has been said by McCain about Hillary! So Sen. McCain needs to apologize to Hillary first!! But, this is all an distraction and this is how they win!!!! Remember People!!! It’s about the ISSUES!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you are an American that makes more than 250k a year then I can assume you will continue with the distraction. If you are an individual that does not lets be smart and stop responding to this crap they are trying to use to be divisive!!!! We should be FIRED UP & READY TO GO TO THE POLLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sharon | September 10, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Republican need to stop crying about their hurt feelings, and start focusing on real issues. Grow up.

Posted by: Erica | September 10, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Calling someone a pig is not sexist. Calling a pig a pig is accurate. Apologizing for calling someone who is a pig, a pig is wrong.
We should debate what kind of pig she is. Let’s take a “fair and balanced” approach.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Obama wasn’t using his tele-prompter and reverted to his Rev. Wright/Trinity church roots. You can take Obama out of Trinity church, but you can’t take trinity church out of Obama. The real G.D. America candidate.
Palin is so refreshing, and caring, a real winner. She has our vote!

Posted by: Alice in Miami | September 10, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Posted by: Kimberly | Sep 10, 2008 10:17:04 AM…GOOD POST!!!!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 10, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

Was Obama really referring to Palin when he made the “lipstick on a pig” remark? Probably not. As he says he might have really been referring to McCain’s economic policies.
Let’s assume he wasn’t referring to Sarah Palin. If he shouldn’t be chastised for being sexist or calling a woman a “pig”, then he SHOULD be chastised for being so stupid.
Certainly Obama knew Sarah Palin made the hockey mom and pit bull statement only a few days earlier and that common sense dictates that if he were to make the “lipstick on a pig” remark at the time he did he might be misinterpreted.
McCain is presently ahead of Obama by at least one or two points. In some polls, by even more. Since the conventions are now finished Obama has one last possibility to pull ahead. He needs to do well in the debates.
He can NOT afford to make utterly stupid mistakes like the “pig” remark. If he does, McCain has the election locked.

Posted by: ivan12356 | September 10, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

If Palin and the GOP is going to have a fit over every little comment the Obama makes, then they don’t need to even enter Washington DC let alone the White House. Get over everything said is anti-female and meant for her. The world and it’s life doesn’t revolve around her. Keep her butt in that remote corner of the USA if she can’t take heat or criticism. She has put her ideas out there, doesn’t mean we have to agree with them and makes them fair game. Sure don’t want her running the country if she can’t handle the public eye!

Posted by: bikerb54 | September 10, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

” If Christian fundamentalists are to be believed, America’s invasion of Iraq and the consequent brutal slaughter of thousands of innocent civilians in that country are all part of a grand divine plan that will finally culminate in the ’second coming’ of Jesus Christ.
Establishing an empire that will extend all over the globe, Christ will rule like a powerful monarch, saving those who believe in him and dispatching non-believers, all non-Christians and non-conformist Christians, to everlasting perdition in hell. This is no childish nonsense for millions of Christian fundamentalists, who sincerely believe this to be predicted in the Bible. Not surprisingly, American Christian fundamentalists are today among the most fanatic supporters of Bush’s global imperialist wars, in Iraq and elsewhere, which they see as in keeping with the divine mandate. They are no eccentric or
lunatic fringe elements, for today Christian fundamentalists exercise a powerful influence in American politics. Among them is George Bush himself, who insists that the American invasion of Iraq has been sanctioned by God, with whom he claims to be in personal communication.” – Best quote I ever read.

Posted by: Brain-$Power$ | September 10, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

>>>So the pit-bull’s whimpering now? If you can’t take the heat, go back to Alaska!<<<
She's not, the voters are!

Posted by: Christie | September 10, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

I think this is so funny that the GOP is crying foul about everything now. They have no other angle. That’s why they brought Palin in, they’re not stupid. They gonna play the sexism and disability card now. What a bunch of sore losers. Get over it, America wants change! I don’t hear anyone asking palin to apoligize by asking the question that started this childish arguement, “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit-bull?” If you’re gonna open yourself up to that, don’t cry like a baby when a common phrase is used against your PARTY. Listen to what he said, he clearly was NOT addressing Palin, he was addressing McCain’s politics. Pathetic reps.

Posted by: Bobby | September 10, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

What a ridiculous reaction on the part of the McCain camp. If I were McCain, I’d be mortified at this reaction to such a common phrase. What a disgrace.

Posted by: Tom G | September 10, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

jpt,I am sure Obama is not that much dumb yet to mean what he said. However, what he said was in appropriate at this time. Also, Binden used similar statements and looks to me Obama campaign is really scared and making controversial statements to generate some media attention.
Lately did anyone notice his grim face. He is incapable and inexperienced in controlling his emotions.

Posted by: Nick | September 10, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The Republicans talk tough, but they won’t let Palin speak to the media until she’s treated with deference. Now they’re manufacturing “hurt feelings” over comments that are clearly innocuous. Obama wasn’t calling anyone a pig or a fish, he was referring to McCain’s policies.
How sad the GOP talks tough and acts weak, demanding apologies and special treatment from the media. Cut the crap, McCain. In order to handle the highest ranking and highest profile jobs in the country, you must be able to handle public scrutiny and have your life under a microscope. It’s a historical reality. GOP: get off the playground and start acting professional. You’re embarrassing yourselves.

Posted by: Von | September 10, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The Palin Truth Squad is appropriately headed by the Jane Swift – of “Swift” Boat fame.

Posted by: flying broker | September 10, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

The GOP really shot themselves in the foot with this one. WOW. To make such a stink about a common phrase. Is this what we want in the whitehouse? A bunch of whiney children? What an embarrassment to this country to even have this elementary school complain in the news. “Whaaaaa, he called me a pig.” LOL

Posted by: Herald F. | September 10, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

One of the first comments way above said how Republicans are hypocrites and religious fanatics because they support the death penalty but, are pro life when it comes to unborn babies.

Posted by: john dodds | September 10, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

On the other hand, the GOP just keeps saying the same untrue one-liners over and over and over, perhaps in an effort to avoid REAL issues????

Posted by: Hopeless | September 10, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

This is like the finger on the nose at Hillary. His writers need to think before they write or he needs to proof read before repeating. He knew people would relate the lipstick to her comment about the pit bull and hockey moms she made at the convention. Got plenty of laughs so he thought he would try it. My suggestion to Obama is start the brain before putting the mouth in gear.

Posted by: C Good | September 10, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Terrorists will learn that Sarah Palin is a sitting duck
because she plays victim so often. When she plays the victim card after they attack us, and call it sexist, they will not be tremendously impressed, to say the least.

Posted by: sylvie2566 | September 10, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Personally, I don’t care who puts lipstick on pigs or pit bulls. Sarah Palin is neither. She’s just a tool – a Rovian tool being used by the right wing faction of her party placed on the ticket so that John McCain can avoid real issues. Can’t win on issues so let’s talk about how big bad Obama is being mean to poor little Sarah. I don’t much like the thought that McCain is hiding behind Palin’s skirt to get out of having a real discussion about important stuff. I’m disappointed that he chose the Rovian way of making this election another one about culture rather than about the real issues. And I thought he was a maverick?????

Posted by: hang | September 10, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

It is easy to see again that most republicans that support mccain don’t care if McSame said it about hillary clinton, Just willing to accept his explaination, You can’t have it both ways. Either Palin & Clinton are both pigs or you who keep up this haterd sould just be real to your self. the only pig is the one filled with haterd.

Posted by: Neal4exsell | September 10, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

No the McCain camp cried foul… not the voters. They put out a statement for her, cuz she’s just not ready to deal with the media questions at this time. She can repeat prepared statements and speeches. A very will trained pit-bull. Sarah, sit, roll-over, speak.

Posted by: whymelord | September 10, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Another distraction from the Republican’s to get off point. First of all John McCain in October was the first to make the pig remark and he was referring to Hillary. Secondly, when the reporter referred to Hillary as “a bitch” I didn’t hear McCain making any apologies. Women wake up and see that if McCain/Palin are elected there go all your rights. She is so the oposite of everything that Hillary believes in.

Posted by: Sandy | September 10, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Another distraction from the Republican’s to get off point. First of all John McCain in October was the first to make the pig remark and he was referring to Hillary. Secondly, when the reporter referred to Hillary as “a bitch” I didn’t hear McCain making any apologies. Women wake up and see that if McCain/Palin are elected there go all your rights. She is so the oposite of everything that Hillary believes in.

Posted by: Sandy | September 10, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

No the McCain camp cried foul… not the voters. They put out a statement for her, cuz she’s just not ready to deal with the media questions at this time. She can repeat prepared statements and speeches. A very well trained pit-bull.
Sarah, sit, roll-over, speak.

Posted by: whymelord | September 10, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

I’m one of those still “undecided” independent voters but I must say that as this race continues, I don’t know how I can support McCain/Palin. To me, it seems that all they are doing is ducking/dodging the real “issues” at every turn and instead, relying on “childish” antics and the astonishing ignorance of a lot of the american people to try to “steal” this election–by hook or crook! Yesterday, all of the major news networks were running this pig/lipstick story in primetime! Have we gone nuts? When young americans are dying in Iraq, we’re bailing out Fannie/Freddie, the budget deficit is projected to be over 400 billion, Lehman Brothers is on the verge of collapse, we’re sending a billion dollars to Georgia, scores of americans are losing their homes (or home values), energy is still high, food prices are crazy, jobs are going overseas, healthcare is ridiculous, illegal immigration is out of control, etc. etc. etc. — and the major news organizations are talking about pigs/lipstick. I’m convinced that we’re all nuts and that this election will not be decided by the voters/issues, but rather by talk radio, cable news programs, Internet blogs, email, talking heads, pundits, commentators, etc.
I tremble when I think of our country’s future!

Posted by: BoKnows | September 10, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Come on Mccain’t, give me a break. Love your service to your country, unfortunately that ended what, 30 years ago? Since then you have lived high on the taxpayer dime. Come to think of it, you did that your entire life. The child of admirals in this country is not known to really want for much with so many bending over to serve you hand and foot right? I happen to know that Admirals have enlisted “servants” that take care of everything to do with their lives and homes and yes, even children. You say that’s not elitist? How many signed up with the goal of serving you? Now you accuse your opponent of saying the EXACT same thing that you said about a female opponent, except it’s different now? So much for Honor, Courage and Commitment. As a 22 year Navy Veteran myself, I wince when I see you use my Navy and my country as a crutch to hide your inability and dishonesty, shame on you! Smart choice for all the wrong reasons in choosing Palin, there is no way she belongs one stroke away from the presidency if you pardon the pun. She ran a state that has a population less than the district that Obama organized in, she met no real resistance in that isolated state, as opposed to Chicago politics where the big boys play, again the pun, oops. Beautiful dreamer, but it is indeed lipstick on a pig, her great zingers and lines are well written by someone else, but what else is behind all that? Failed policies, nothing but opportunism? This nation; yes there is a nation out here, needs someone who understands OUR lives. You have never had to live my life, you have never walked in my shoes, you have had 27 years to effect change, and now all of a sudden you are going to really do it? You don’t deserve to hold power over my life as President of the United, no not the Divided, the UNITED STATES of America my friend.

Posted by: william | September 10, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

If nothing else, these comments were simply stupid. What kind of judgment does Obama have? This isn’t the first time he has degraded other people and then had to eat his own words.

Posted by: Linda | September 10, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

LIPSTICK ON A PIG!?!
Obama has reached a new low…
First, it was his sexist treatment of Hillary, now Palin.

Posted by: amy | September 10, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

I guess we need McCain and the Republicans to provide us now with the PC list of what barnyard or other animals are PC in their hypocritical world. This whole silly debate plays into their dirty politics and the fact that they can’t win on the issues. However, I must say that in order to avoid the trap, Obama should just stay on message and keep his animal metaphors to one:
You can put lipstick on an ELEPHANT, but it’s the same OLD ELEPHANT of the GOP and that elephant’s name is George W. Bush.
It’s that easy and on message!

Posted by: david | September 10, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Unqualified, book-banning, creationist, right-wing lunatic with scandal after scandal. Sarah Palin, the change America needs!

Posted by: Bob | September 10, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Geez, since when did the Presidential Campaign turn into High School? No wonder people in other countries think we have fallen as a people. With everything that is going on in our country right now..this is what both sides are b*tching about? Who said what about a pig, dog, duck? How the F is this going to help me in my life? Great, my nation is at it’s wits end and yet all ADULTS want to do is name call, then argue about what the phrase was intended for. Glad to know that social security, the US economy, healthcare (or the lack thereof), education dont really matter to the citizens of the US, all that matters is who did coke some 20 yrs ago or who said pig first. Our priorites are so screwed up and it shows on this board and many others. Wake me when we all start discussing the issues that REALLY MATTER!

Posted by: Michelle | September 10, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Geez, since when did the Presidential Campaign turn into High School? No wonder people in other countries think we have fallen as a people. With everything that is going on in our country right now..this is what both sides are b*tching about? Who said what about a pig, dog, duck? How the F is this going to help me in my life? Great, my nation is at it’s wits end and yet all ADULTS want to do is name call, then argue about what the phrase was intended for. Glad to know that social security, the US economy, healthcare (or the lack thereof), education dont really matter to the citizens of the US, all that matters is who did coke some 20 yrs ago or who said pig first. Our priorites are so screwed up and it shows on this board and many others. Wake me when we all start discussing the issues that REALLY MATTER!

Posted by: Michelle | September 10, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Never fear, Obama will bring out the race card. This is Obama’s ace in the hole. Obama’s time has come and gone, Palin is true reform/change, no more empty suit Obama. His fund raising is in the dumps.
Now is the time for the kool-aid drinkers to go cold turkey and join Palin Power, this is the future of our great country. We have always been proud of our country !!!!!!!!!!
McCain – Palin in ’08 & ’12

Posted by: Sherry 1969 | September 10, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

McCain/Palin provide way much better solutions to the issues. And, they have way much better characters!
A president’s character is so important. Obama just doesn’t have either the solutions or the character!
His insulting comment agaist women and palin revealed that, again!!!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

The McCain camp and all of the rabid anti-Obama folks on this site will have to answer some day, judgment day, for their hatefilled attempts to distract people from the real issues. They are hurting Americans with this crap, and Christians and good citizens will not stand for it.

Posted by: anotherpatricia | September 10, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I’m sorry I lost count… how many times did Obama cry racism???
First Biden refers to Palin’s looks and now Obama refers to her as a “pig”. Seems like Obama and Biden cannot see a woman as a fellow politician. Maybe it’s true that this country is not ready for a woman in the white house… this is a shame :-(

Posted by: Luisa | September 10, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

While this is an old saying, there are many old sayings which are no longer appropriate to use–this is one of them–particularly when there is a woman running. Obama needs to apologize quickly–if he doesn’t every woman and man in this nation needs to feel offended regardless of which party she/he supports support.

Posted by: StLouisMan | September 10, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

This is all the McCain/Palin campaign has to complain about? An analogy that John McCain himself used in referring to Hillary Clinton? … seriously? How about addressing some REAL issues? Or are they afraid their newly baptized Saint Palin will fall flat on her face as the imposter that she really is?

Posted by: Independent Minds | September 10, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Wow, someone on this page actually thought that pitbull/hockey mom joke was ad lib. That’s the funniest thing I’ve heard all week.
…I mean, aside from another double standard by the McCain camp. It’s ok for him to make the reference when a Democratic female is running for the presidency, but it’s not OK for Obama to make the same reference when a Republican female is going for VP?
“Not when she made a reference to that subject the week before,” you say?
Then explain to me how McCain choosing a female running mate a week after an instant response to Obama’s choice of VP, in which they blasted Obama for not choosing a woman, was anything less than pandering.
“But she’s a maverick,” you say?
Right. Anyone who solidifies the traditional base of the Republican party behind McCain is a maverick.
I never bought into the fact that McCain would be a Bush third tirm. But Palin is every bit the neocon.

Posted by: Hilarioius | September 10, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

The Report – 1
Governer Swift – 0
The Reporter makes Governer Swift look as foolish in this article as foolish as a pig would look wearing lip stick..

Posted by: Bruce | September 10, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Surely a man smart enough to be elected president should have foreseen how these remarks would be taken. Don’t Harvard law grads know the impact of words?
I can’t believe Obama said that.

Posted by: John | September 10, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Sarah Palin is starting to not look very good.
She whines too much, plays victim too much.
I initially really thought about voting for her.
What the hell was I thinking?

Posted by: sylvie2566 | September 10, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Last night they reported on ABC News that the United States is ranked 19th in graduating students from High School, people please focus on the issues, America is falling fast…..
Obama 08

Posted by: Nicky | September 10, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Obama is WAY ahead in electoral votes and that’s what decides elections. Even if you can leave your trailer to vote, it’s not going to matter, just ask John Kerry or Al Gore – both won the popular vote. Now that the shoe is on the other (left) foot, feeling a little tight, is it, my redneck friends?

Posted by: Cynda P. | September 10, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Maybe we’re getting too thin skinned. “Lipstick on a pig” is as old as lipstick but repeating it seems to have hurt Obama.
Maybe he should have chosen his words more carefully. I have noticed that Obama doesn’t do well when the pressure is on. If getting a few points behind in the polls makes him say things that can be misinterpreted, how is he going to handle the pressure of the presidency?
I hope Palin shrugs off the comment and puts herself above it all.

Posted by: Oonogil | September 10, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Apparently, this country has no bigger pressing issue than watching and listening to two grownup political campaigns increasingly behave like adolescent bullies. If this is the best America can do, then we don’t have much to wave the flag about, now do we?
I watched both conventions, and the level of sheer nastiness exhibited by the barrage of personalized insults in the Republican one showed me that the party apparently hates America enough to be less interested in coping with the country’s problems than in holding power. It wouldn’t matter if the Democrats were honest or not – the tone was set in 2000 for these political campaigns to be nothing more than a repated mantra of cynical lies. And then we wonder why a third of Americans won’t vote.
The American people should have the right to pull both campaigns off the ballot, or at least have a “none of the above” option. I’m not interested in voting for people with the emotional maturity of children – or professional liars.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | September 10, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

If Hillary had famously made the same comment Palin did in her speech, then you’d have a point. Hillary didn’t. Palin did. 0bama might as well have come out today and screamed “YEEEEEAAAAARRRRRGGGGHHH!”.
Concerned in Oh Please do the country a favor and reframe from voting. Your vote will be one of the most ill informed votes in history. In an intelligent way please explain what exactly you think Obama was saying about Palin? I would ask Palin to respond but she is the first VP in history that does not take questions.
She runs from the cameras faster then that Jamaican guy Hussein Bolt.
I call her the running woman running from those cameras as fast as she can… It’s the running woman breaking speeds never imagined in dodging those Reporters. I do not know about change we can believe in but it sure is speed we can believe in.

Posted by: TJustSaying | September 10, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Obama owes nothing to the McCain campaign. It is obvious to all that he was talking about McCain’s suddent image makeover, but if Republicans see a connection between Palin and a pig, then they should own that. He has taken great care not to personally attack his opponents even when the GOP continues their typical campaign of character assasination. The GOP lacks honor, honesty and class.

Posted by: DaveM | September 10, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Ted,
I’ve witnessed a first. You are the first person that has ever posted a comment that made absolute perfect sense. You’re exactly right, & the fact that you feel that way despite your loyaties is a lesson we could all learn from. Great post.

Posted by: Dee Tee Gee | September 10, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Not a day goes by without the McCain camp making statements to the media they are offended, want apologies and want the offenses rescinded by the offender.
And they think McCain/Palin can lead our country and negotiate high conflict resolutions for the safety of our country? They can’t handle their American opponents – the “prize” being who gets the job. How will they handle the foreign leaders they are in dispute with – the “prize” being national security?
These aren’t leaders – these are whiners.
I’m voting for real leadership – Barrack Obama and Joe Biden.

Posted by: Cindy | September 10, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Take note, much more O fans here are using insulting/dirty words than MaCain/Palin fans! They are actually calling Sarah “pig”. The Obama camp is sinking way too low. This is a big issue!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Wow – the kooks are out in full force on this one… ISSUES, I demand that we talk about issues not fake Republican outrage at nothing.

Posted by: Chipo1965 | September 10, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

The Republicans are so good at camouflaging the issues and dividing the country along racial, gender, east, west , north, south, white , Black, rich, Poor even urban and suburban. It is so amazing.
The media uses these same tactics to stimulate stories and ratings thereto. The Democrats loose because they always want to play the honest party. They tell the truth. They seek reconciliation not division and they think that is what the american people want but little that they know ,not even the so called christians want that not to mention the closet racists.
They will lie cheat and steal to be in power. That is why the Republicans loathe the Clintons, because the Clintons were willing to play as dirty as they are to win.

Posted by: mal | September 10, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

It is truly PITIFUL how our upcoming leaders of this great nation, are calling names and acting like fools to gain childish attention from our (adolescent)adult population! You’d swear we were watching wrestle-mania! We must look like fools to the world, again! Is there anyone with respectable ‘class’ left in this country, that hasn’t BS’d their way to the top? I wouldn’t vote for ANYONE on either ticket!!! They’re not worth their salt.

Posted by: gdguy4hillary | September 10, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Wow – the kooks are out in full force on this one… ISSUES, I demand that we talk about issues not fake Republican outrage at nothing.

Posted by: Chipo1965 | September 10, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Jokes aside, if Palin can describe herself as a Pit Bull with lipstick, her lying campaign can earn her a pig with Lipstick.

Posted by: Kirk | September 10, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Obama is a leader, he calls it how he sees in the language that people understand. And we all know that Palins choice for VP was a “pig in a poke” (look it up in the dictionary) which the American public will pay dearly for if McCain wins.
McCain has no honor when heb talks about energy conservation etc.. and then votes against job creating energy bills 14 times.

Posted by: CarmanK | September 10, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Hi. I’m the official spokesperson for the Stupid Squad – formered early on in this campaign to address stupid, inane, and worthless, non-issue campaign rhetoric. Well, it didn’t take long for something REALLY, REALLY stupid to come out of the McCain campaign. This ‘lipstick on a pig’ ‘issue takes American-style politics to an all-time low in the Squad’s opinion. And the media, in typical fashion, are fanning the flames by inserting themselves into this non-debate.
John McCain used to be above such tactics, but now he’s letting his campaign try to Swift Boat Obama at every turn. The McCain camp must think the American people are really dumb. On the Stupid Meter this ‘issue’ ranks an 8 out 10. Way to go McCain Campaign!

Posted by: Stupid Squad | September 10, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

“Do you remember Obamas gaffe? Saying that he has been to all 57 states? Is it a gaffe or a Freudian slip? ”
No. It’s a gaffe. There were 57 races in the Democratic primary.

Posted by: Hilarious | September 10, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

While I don’t have the same blind devotion as Swift, there is a fundamental difference in the statements of John McCain and Obama’s:
One, McCain was talking about a policy, not a person. Obama definitely was.
Second, Hillary Clinton hadn’t just (or ever, as far as I’m aware) made a speech in which she referred to herself as something with lipstick. Obviously, Sarah Palin did.
Obama can dress this up however he likes – look at his record of “truthfulness”. He called Americans bitter, clinging to their bibles and guns, then tried to explain that away when it got out; he said he never heard Wright give his hateful, racist sermons, although he attended the church for 20 years, then reversed himself on that – what two or three times; got caught saying one thing in a debate about NAFTA then contacting the Canadians secretly to say, “oh, I didn’t mean it”; he promised to take public financing, then he reversed himself. How much evidence do we all need that this man is not honest or honorable.
All candidates change their minds and change their positions at times – that’s only being human, and who of us haven’t done that? However, Obama holds himself above all of us and looks down on us.
The only change he represents is that we will have someone who cares first and foremost – and I suspect only (where is his grandmother and any other members of his family in this election? – oh, that’s right – he threw her under the bus) – for himself. Anyone who dares question or disagree with the almighty Obama is either stupid or a racist. Is that really what we want our country to be like?

Posted by: traci | September 10, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Just now, @ a library somewhere in Virginia, Sen. Barack Obama just, once again, felt the need to “scold” not only John McCain, for attempting to claim that the “lipstick on a pig” remark referred to Gov. Sarah Palin, but the news media as well. I just thought of another expression, “Dont bite the hand that feeds you”. Once again, Barack blames EVERYONE EXCEPT HIMSELF for his actions. It is clear that Barack intentionally made the “lipstick” comment with two understandings; 1.] that he was referring to Gov. Sarah Palin’s lipstick line in her acceptance speech 2.] that he would be attacked by the McCain campaign. Why, you may ask? Simple, so that he COULD go on the news today and have the opportunity to “scold” McCain & the news media, thereby making himself look as if HE is the only rational, fair, intelligent guy in America. This may appear an extreme theory, but ask yourself this, why could an otherwise intelligent rational man be stupid and thoughtless enough to make the “lipstick” comment in the first place? Barack’s is not the “politics of change” it is the politics of deception and manipulation.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | September 10, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

I have a much better rule. The media should get a greater modicum of intelligence and stop letting itself be endlessly gamed and played by campaigns and political operatives regardless of stripe. When the euphemistically-named McCain “Truth Squad” released the statement it did, or if something was released that correlates to it from the other side, all press outlets should summarily place it into the trash bin as the asinine game that it was and will ever remain. When will the media play its role in helping to educate the American people to function at a high level in a democratic society? Instead of being taken for a ride, an independently-minded press should itself drive the election agenda around each and every ISSUE facing voters, and be relentless about obtaining that seemingly long forgotten thing called THE TRUTH. I greatly fear for the future of this country.

Posted by: Stephen E | September 10, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

His character is way too low, just like his insulting comments against women. O fans, this is a big issue the voters will consider and vote for McCain/Palin!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

It is getting ugly. no more DEM mud bashing will be tolerated. Its time to swing back and slam you guys for the crude your putting out. Remember, all your mud slinging and comments in Obamas name will be your cause for non victory.

Posted by: Jim Rod | September 10, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

This woman is a money pig, with or without lipstick. Palin calls herself a “fiscal conservative,” but during her 6
years as mayor, she increased general government expenditures by over
33%. She also increased the amount of taxes collected by the city by 38%. And she increased a regressive sales tax which taxed even food.
Despite the huge increases in tax revenues, she still borrowed
money. She inherited a city with zero debt, but left it with indebtedness of over $22 million (this is a city of 6,000, mind you). $15 M+ went for construction of a sports complex which was still tied up in litigation 7 yrs later.

Posted by: justme | September 10, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Just another example among many of how the Republican party wants to have it both ways, and constantly “righteously” contradicts themselves when the tables are turned. Who is fooled by this? They realize that the only way they can fool the American public into voting for this extremist, vicious woman is to strenuously control the flow of information that comes out about her. Sheltering her from possible non-deferential treatment by the press? Ridiculous to think they have that right, the American public has the right to hearthe whole story and know exactly what she is about.

Posted by: Susan Roppel | September 10, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

Well, Philly Paul, if the charge you make about Obama is true, then what should Americans expect from McCain? Something more substantial? We’ve already seen differently – and we remember that Republicans dumped McCain eight years ago to give us “I’m a uniter, not a divider” Bush. And we all know what happened the past eight years.

Posted by: kevinbgoode | September 10, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

how could anyone that listen to Barack Obama this morning come up with the bull that again he was talking about palin Open your ears, hear it all to get the truth. He explained it well lets move on. He said some great things on Education. Talk about that. we need change not the chump change of McSame.

Posted by: Neal4exsell | September 10, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Well St. Louis Man if Obama has to apologize to slick Sarah, then McCain has to apologize to Hillary for doing the same thing.

Posted by: upstatenydude | September 10, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Anyone who gets in a lather over this is going to get a huge shock come election time. I’m starting to hope that McCain wins because then the people who voted for him are going to truly feel the sting of the Republican leadership. Think about it, Bush has been in office for eight years and look at the mess we’re in. You’re going to stick someone else in there to continue the status quo?? Well good luck, we’re not all going to suffer. For those who are having it rough but decide to go for McCain/Palin I wish you all the best during the next for years. I’m not surprised because Bush did get a second term.

Posted by: Alex | September 10, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I am sure Obama wasn’t referring to Palin or McCain. Obama has tried to refrain from going negative. Palin has been attacking Obama every since she came on the scene, along with McCain. Maybe she should apologize for telling lies and half truths on Obama. This is an old expression used by many. It means you can’t cover it up with lipstick it is still what it is.
America is going to Hell in a handbasket and we are talking about these little silly things.

Posted by: Diana Baskin | September 10, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

America will have serious problem if the voters elect such an extremist like Obama. I definitely support McCain. Even Bill Clinton is much better than Obama.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

And in addition to this fake outrage over an expression that I would guess Republicans probably use more than Democrats, McCain just falsely accused Obama of wanting to teach “comprehensive sex education” to kindergarteners.
Where is the outrage over that one?

Posted by: jock59801 | September 10, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

So here’s the truth: McCain won’t say a thing to us about policy; Palin *can’t* say anything to us about policy because she hasn’t learned anything about it yet. So the McCain campaign falls back on negative attack ads. And since there just isn’t enough negative stuff about Obama to report, they make stuff up. Fantastic!
What kind of moron would ever be convinced by it? Oh, heh. Sorry guys. Good luck with your GEDs.

Posted by: James | September 10, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

The only PIG in this equation is OBAMA!

Posted by: ohio | September 10, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

John McCain reminds of all the girls who want a wedding, not a marriage. He wants to win the election, but doesn’t have a clue what to do after that.

Posted by: Cynda P. | September 10, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Anyone who gets in a lather over this is going to get a huge shock come election time. I’m starting to hope that McCain wins because then the people who voted for him are going to truly feel the sting of the Republican leadership. Think about it, Bush has been in office for eight years and look at the mess we’re in. You’re going to stick someone else in there to continue the status quo?? Well good luck, we’re not all going to suffer. For those who are having it rough but decide to go for McCain/Palin, I wish you all the best during the next four years. I’m not surprised because Bush did get a second term.

Posted by: Alex | September 10, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

I’m growing so tired of reports like this. After 2 years of the Democrats’ campaign bickering and finger poking it’s time the media focuses on the serious matters and ignores things like this.

Posted by: Tired Of This | September 10, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Let’s be real here. She wants to be treated as what??? A politician or a woman? As a politician running for office, she is just that…a politician and as a politician, the discourse can be brutal and unforgiving, that goes with the territory. There’s no politcal battleground just for women. If there were one, then we truly have done what most women don’t want, being seen and treated as just that…a women, instead of a person of equal standing. If she just wants to be treated first as a woman, then she needs to do some other line of work. You can’t stand there with a straight face and say you stand for equal rights and treatment of women, but you only want to be engaged in political discourse as a woman. Can’t have it both ways, I know of no woman that would want that. Treat them for who they are, not what they. For Republicans to think they can confuse people with gimmicks like this, and in particular women in general is a slap in the face not only to all women, but at everyone that believes in equal rights, equal respect, equal treatment for all. Palin however would rather not be treated as equal, but instead allows hereself to be used as a tool by these same people who would cry “foul” at anything directed at her because she should be treated differently as a woman.

Posted by: Jake | September 10, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

If a person thinks of themselves as a pig maybe they are .It was okay for mccain to use that term but not Obama?More streching of the truth .and if the person that thinks that he was referring to all women as fish Take a bath.And maybe you will feel better about yourself.I GUESS THIS IS PICGATE?

Posted by: vinnie | September 10, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

“The only PIG in this equation is OBAMA!
Posted by: ohio | Sep 10, 2008 11:06:48 AM”
No the only PIG in this equation is all that PORK Palin supported while mayor and governor. I hear she broke some records number one PORK per citizen in the nation while all the while accusing Obama of massive PORK spending. That is the kind of nerve you cannot teach but rather the kind you have to born with.

Posted by: TJustSaying | September 10, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Obama getting worried – he’s dropping like a lead ball in the polls – white women leaving in droves – now this nasty remark – he’s working hard to lose this election and he’s going to suceed. Dumb Democrat!

Posted by: Ravenhair49 | September 10, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Um, “Kevinbegoode” – No, I would not expect something more from the McCain camp, that is my point exactly. Both Barack and John are POLITICIANS, more alike then they like to admit. It is just more pathetic having to constantly listen to Barack claim that he is NOT a “typical Washington politician”. Of the four involved in this race, it appears that Gov. Sarah Palin is the ONLY candidate that can honestly lay claim to the fact that SHE is “above the fray”. Barack should have ignored this issue and moved on. Today, he just could not help his huge ego, yet again. This man is not Presidential. This may be the first time ever in my nearly 30 years of voting in Presidential elections that I choose not to vote for either candidate.

Posted by: PhillyPaul | September 10, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

If a person thinks of themselves as a pig maybe they are .It was okay for mccain to use that term but not Obama?More streching of the truth .and if the person that thinks that he was referring to all women as fish Take a bath.And maybe you will feel better about yourself.I GUESS THIS IS PICGATE?

Posted by: vinnie | September 10, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

There are still people comparing Obama’s comment on Palin with McCain’s comment on Clinton policy. Their wording was different. Obama’s was a personal attack and certainly a lot of people in the crowd and in front of the TV got that.
Moreover, Palin just used the lipstick phrase several days ago in her great speech. Obama was either ignorant or arrogant to say such a comment several days later. In either case, Obama owes a sincere apology, not his flip-flop kind of playing with words.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

There are still people comparing Obama’s comment on Palin with McCain’s comment on Clinton policy. Their wording was different. Obama’s was a personal attack and certainly a lot of people in the crowd and in front of the TV got that.
Moreover, Palin just used the lipstick phrase several days ago in her great speech. Obama was either ignorant or arrogant to say such a comment several days later. In either case, Obama owes a sincere apology, not his flip-flop kind of playing with words.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

The feigned slight by the Republicans is interesting. They saw nothing wrong with slandering Obama and his pastor, yet you are being anti-Christian if you question Palin’s pastor and their “speaking in tongues” BS, their statements regarding the Iraq war as “being willed by God”, etc., etc.
To Mr. McBush and Ms.Morals- I don’t want to hear about you being offended. I want to hear about why Mr. McBush defended DHL and how he is going to replace the 8,000 jobs that are going to be lost (thanks to his campaign lobbyists, er, I mean campaign staffers)here in Wilmington, OH.
I noticed you came back to Ohio yesterday- why didn’t you hold your rally in Wilmington?????

Posted by: John F | September 10, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

So sad, sad, sad, sad, sad…..
The elements of the under current of RACISM against senator Obama is beginning to raise its ugly, twisted, snake head…..
These silly folks out there calling for him to apologize should shut up…..

Posted by: shalom | September 10, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

If a person thinks of themselves as a pig maybe they are .It was okay for mccain to use that term but not Obama?More streching of the truth .and if the person that thinks that he was referring to all women as fish Take a bath.And maybe you will feel better about yourself.I GUESS THIS IS PICGATE?

Posted by: vinnie | September 10, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

If you liberals had any brains you’d get off the net and start solving problems, like Sarah does. But I’m sure you’ll go back to blogging your insults, not understanding anything about running a country. Eventually you will come to understand that the conservative principles are far better for a country over time.

Posted by: rick | September 10, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

It’s amazing to hear the number of right wingers who came out of the woodwork this morning to reinforce the old adage, “if the shoe fits, wear it”. Sure are a lot of folks wearing those shoes on the right wing neo-con spin-meister shows this morning. Guess that comment by Senator Obama hit a sore spot.

Posted by: devilkev | September 10, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Palin as a VP is supposed to be the attack dog, but Obama is so threatened by her, that he is smearing her left and right, that is not presidential, leave that to Biden who is supposed to do that job for him. By smearing a VP, he lost his status as a President, not so smart on Obama side, but well, that’s him.
Also, you have to know when to use certain phrase and how to use it. He certainly doesn’t know his timing, so another not-so-smart move using this phrase this time round. That is also the problem when you try to use other people’s phrase at the wrong time, it does give a different meaning altogether.

Posted by: jackie | September 10, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

I’m not sure what scares me more the fact that he has used the expression before and obviously doesn’t remember it (early Alzheimer’s?) or that this is what the Republican Party wants to focus on. The want to say Palin is a strong capable woman, yet by doing this type of spin on something it looks like she can’t stand the heat and people are rushing to defend and protect her from Obama. They can’t have it both ways either she is ready, willing and able to be VP or she isn’t. She needs to stop hiding behind the men and start speaking for herself or maybe the Republican Party is afraid that the old adage of “better to keep your mouth shut and let people wonder if you a fool then to open it and prove” it will come true.

Posted by: AttitudeOfGratitude | September 10, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

The art of distraction… As long as McCain can keep this stuff in the press we won’t think about issues that matter.

Posted by: Stacey | September 10, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Whoever came up with the idea of playing the Hillary women deserves a medal, both for keeping the white house and giving us such comedy. I for one never would have thought it would work because while they are hideous to look at, I’d thought they were smart. I’ve taken to reading their blogs every day just for the freak show.I also think Johnny mac deserves a medal, for striking a blow for all men who want to pick women by our criteria, Just as Cindy reaches her sell-by date the old fox scores the highly decorative Sarah. Cigars in the oval office?

Posted by: Mark from Pheonix | September 10, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Funny. I was just telling my wife last night how obvious it was that Jake Tapper was wanting Obama in office. Much of MSM is biased for him – but Jake has been very outspoken

Posted by: Bubba_357 | September 10, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Why was it okay when McCain used the same statement this past May when talking about Hillary Clinton?
Stay focused on the issues ABC.

Posted by: Elaine | September 10, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

“Obama getting worried – he’s dropping like a lead ball in the polls – white women leaving in droves – now this nasty remark – he’s working hard to lose this election and he’s going to suceed. Dumb Democrat!
Posted by: Ravenhair49 | Sep 10, 2008 11:11:09 AM”
No try again no sense. The Republican convention was was 4 days of tribute to the war hero John McCain. I guess we have to catch part two in 2012 to actually get any issues out of them. I have to admit if the American people asked me to explain the last 8 years I would be dumb founded as well. However, I sure as hell would not have the balls to ask for 8 More!!!!

Posted by: TJustSaying | September 10, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

President Obama does not need to apologise to anybody. On the other hand the McPainful need to apologise to the American people for the lies they are saying in their rallies. It’s OK when they attack President Obama or Biden but it’s not OK when they fight back.

Posted by: ob08 | September 10, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

The audience knew Obama was referring to Palin with the lipstick remark. That’s why they started laughing before he finished. Watch the video.
He did the same to Hillary Clinton with the middle finger to the nose stunt. They understood.
Obama is clever. He trashes his female opponents in a way that’s deniable, yet everyone in the room knows what he’s doing. Shame on the DNC for putting this immature candidate in front of the voters.

Posted by: Juju | September 10, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Let me summarize the Republican argument here:
Whatever the Democrats say is suspect and wrong. Whatever the Republicans say is above suspicion and correct, even when it has been proven to be false and misleading by independent sources.
Republicans play cynical, low-road politics at its worst, assuming that the American public is so stupid that they will believe anything if it is repeated often enough.
There’s nothing new there. It’s classic Karl Rove.
The real question is, are the American people stupid enough to vote for a political party that clearly regards them as stupid, and that has no qualms about looking them straight in the eye and lying over and over again and that has been caught doing so over and over, merely because that party now argues it has “changed.”

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I’m not completely convinced that Obama was referring to Palin when he made those commments, BUT in light of Palin’s well known acceptance speech, what Obama said was at minimum unwise and possibly stupid. If you went to a stranger anytime in the past week and asked what came to mind when you say “politics and lipstick”, most people will think of Palin’s speech. I understand that the “lipstick on a pig” comment is common in Washington, but 90% of the voters don’t know that and when Obama made his comment, 90% of the people probably assumed he was referring to Palin. He may not have been referring to Palin, but honestly, it’s shocking that he didn’t understand that it was a very unwise comment based on the timing. He shouldn’t be surprised in people’s response.

Posted by: al | September 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Context Context Context. Palin joked about lipstick and now any comment about pigs/lipsticks is off-limits. At best it was insensitive and the “Big O” should apologize.
Remember John Wiley Price in Dallas who recently said he thinks “black holes” “angel food cake” and “devils food cake” are all racist terms? Context.

Posted by: Colleen | September 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Whoever came up with the idea of playing the Hillary women deserves a medal, both for keeping the white house and giving us such comedy. I for one never would have thought it would work because while they are hideous to look at, I’d thought they were smart. I’ve taken to reading their blogs every day just for the freak show.I also think Johnny mac deserves a medal, for striking a blow for all men who want to pick women by our criteria, Just as Cindy reaches her sell-by date the old fox scores the highly decorative Sarah.

Posted by: Mark from Pheonix | September 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Wow, Obama a.k.a. Oblunder is really taking a dive. Joe Biden should give some serious thought to pulling out. He’s doesn’t seem like a bad guy but he’s already lost two or three Presidential bids, doesn’t think Obama is qualified and doesn’t need more egg on his face.

Posted by: Gary FL | September 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Well said, Rick! I hope the leftist will learn. But I doubt Obama will ever. He even boast he has more executive experience than Palin does. What a blind joke!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Their is one thing that is evident from reading this or anyother site. George B ush nor any other politician did not cause devide in this country. The issues and how to handle them come from 2 differant world veiws . Some of these veiws overlap ;some are so opposing that their can not be any compromise. They are issues so important to our survival that only one veiw can be right. We better not get it wrong if we do not want to slip into a history as a non influence such as many strong cultures have in the past. I have financially supported many strong leaders in the past ;from both parties most races in differant capacities of life.. If Obama is the best the Democrats have? Then I respect them and maybe that is true even if SAD

Posted by: BRIAN TURNER | September 10, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Their is one thing that is evident from reading this or anyother site. George B ush nor any other politician did not cause devide in this country. The issues and how to handle them come from 2 differant world veiws . Some of these veiws overlap ;some are so opposing that their can not be any compromise. They are issues so important to our survival that only one veiw can be right. We better not get it wrong if we do not want to slip into a history as a non influence such as many strong cultures have in the past. I have financially supported many strong leaders in the past ;from both parties most races in differant capacities of life.. If Obama is the best the Democrats have? Then I respect them and maybe that is true even if SAD

Posted by: BRIAN TURNER | September 10, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

You guys are simply PATHETIC!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I haven’t had a raise in years. My school loans have punctured the ceiling. I am backed up with my bills and you all are debating about lipstick on a pig????????????? Who cares.

Posted by: Fish & Chips | September 10, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Can we get back to the issues now? Your blog got a lot of hits. ABC/Disney made some dough. Quit letting the McCain campaign skirt the issues of this campaign. Oops, I said skirt. I must have been making some sneaky comment about McCain hiding behind Palin.

Posted by: Zach in MI | September 10, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

I have to hand it to John McCain. He has had Obama going in reverse since Palin was chosen. A tactical stroke of genius. I think this reveals a great deal about Mr. McCain’s pragmatic insight.

Posted by: mkmich | September 10, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Victory,
What problems has Sarah Palin solved? Name one. “Drill baby drill?” Is that a problem solver. No, the US has only 3% of oil reserves but we use more than 20% of the oil produced.
Did she stop the bridge to nowhere? No, she was for it until it became politically unpopular.
Did she end congressional earmarks? No, as mayor she went after them aggressively, and Alaska still get quite a high percentage of them.
I guess the only “problem” she solved was the McCain campaign’s problem of making sure the media did not report issues.

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 10, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Do issues such as the economy and Iraq matter? This is crazy.

Posted by: Issues Matter | September 10, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Rick: I’m amazed you and others play Sara Palin as a problem solver. If she were to solve many more problems like her unwanted sports center in Wasilla that left the inhabitants head over heels in debt and lawsuits out the ying yang, not only Alaska, but the nation as well couldn’t afford it, especially added to the policies of McCain, that if actually enacted would rapidly accelerate the bankruptcy of America, the course that it is presently on.

Posted by: devilkev | September 10, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

victory – On this issue, republican supporters saying Obama reference to a pig was a reference to Palin are either whiners, liars, or stupid. There are other issues where it is the democrats that are whiners, liars, or stupid. No American can be proud of how either party run their campaign or run the government. They both do more harm to America than good. It is a good thing the most Americans have common sense and aspire to honesty. And it is a good thing our troops and their military leaders aspire to what is right and not behave like they can do anything they want because they can cover it up with lies.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | September 10, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Sen. John McCain has proved himself to be unqualified and incapable of effectively leading the United States of America into the future by, among other things, his reckless, irresponsible, impulsive, and dangerous judgment in picking Sarah Palin as his running mate. Sarah Palin is a minor distraction not even worthy of discussion. However, Sen. John McCain has shown his contempt for the intelligence of the American people by making this unequivocally cynical decision to use an unknown, untested, and corrupt, serial liar like Sarah Palin to deceive voters into believing he stands for change. Sen. John McCain also disgraced himself by demonstrating a lack of courage in his choice of Sarah Palin at the last moment over much more qualified Republican men and women simply because she appeals to the base of the Republican Party, a group of voters he was going to lose. What Sen. John McCain doesn’t understand is that by appeasing the extreme right wing of the Republican Party, he is going to lose the voters that really count, i.e., moderate and independent voters, and, in doing so, certainly lose the election. Obama/Biden 2008!!!

Posted by: caliguy55 | September 10, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I have never seen so much exasperation and emotional distress over the possibility of Obama losing what was an easy win. This is the weakness, the vulnerability (generally speaking) of the Democratic party…TOO emotional, to reactionary; lashing out at fellow Americans, many who have not even decided which way to vote, calling them stupid or ignorant if they vote for anyone but Obama and demeaning woman who happen to believe in work/family balance and religion. The Huffington Post / Daily Coast are all LOSING this election for Obama. But there is no discipline in the democratic party, they can’t help or contain themselves. With Obama’s new money issues, the GOP is licking it’s chops over the Barbara Streisand fund raiser..just another opportuntiy to reinforce the fact that Obama is backed by the far left liberal elite. How could they all screw this one up?
Keep up the good work, Dems!

Posted by: bfree007 | September 10, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I thought it was funny when McCain said Chelsea was ugly because Janet Reno was her father but lipstick on a pig? Need to make it funnier

Posted by: Mark | September 10, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

This is the tactic of the McCain campaign…..to get folks talking about stupid stuff….Why? because they only have 4 more years of Bush policies to offer…..
Stupid Stuff is winning the day…….
Stupid stuff!!!!!

Posted by: shalom | September 10, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

JimRod – according to this article, John McCain said it first, directly attributing it to Hillary Clinton’s health care plan. So given your reasoning, this is indicative of John McCain’s feelings towards his wife and all women.
You’ve claimed several times that Obama is a terrorist supporter. What proof do you have to back up your outlandish and hysterical claims?

Posted by: Cindy | September 10, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

McCain is happy as a clam he chose Palin. First as his reputation shows (out with the old in with the new) he has a pretty woman next to him. Second he doesn’t have to campaign and show how dumb he is and how very much he is like Bush because all the hubbub is about Palin and she isn’t even running for President. This grade school he said she said needs to stop, thats not telling me anything about the issues and where the candidates stand and if that is all that matters to you then heaven help us all. This country is so screwed up after 8 years of Bush it seems that the concerned citizen has more to worry about than trying to turn innocent phrases around to bash a candidate. What does McCain stand for? This is for McCain….GET OUT FROM BEHIND PALIN’S SKIRT AND STATE WHAT IT IS YOUR GOING TO DO TO HELP THE MESS YOUR BUDDY BUSH PUT US IN.

Posted by: Concerned in NC | September 10, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

To those who say the conservatives are the only ones upset: I am a registerd Democrat and I am appalled at Obama’s statement. Obama should issue an apology.

Posted by: amy | September 10, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Here’s how I see it.
America is facing a major finacial meltdown and we discuss lipstick.
America is facing a resurgent Russian threat and we discuss lipstick.
America is facing a tremendous energy shortage and we discuss lipstick.
America is facing a declining infrastructure and we discuss lipstick.
America is facing a terrorism from all side and we discuss lipstick.
Shell I continue? There is quite a bit more you know. Better still I think I should make a statement about lipstick.
Here goes!!!
Lipstick doesn’t matter, real issues do. Don’t get caught up in all the hype!!!
This is what our declining education system has brought us. We can’t distinguish the difference between what really matter and what someone tells us matters.
Vote on issues not on rhetoric, race or sex. It just plain STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: A Concerned American | September 10, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

wow , finding a single suitable adjective to describe this tempest in a teacup is harder than i had figured originally.
i think ” moronic ” is probably the most appropriate so far , but “idiotic” and “retarded” arent far behind in the running.

Posted by: bah | September 10, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

IF SHE IS NOT A PIG THEN SHE SHOULD COME OUT AND SAY SO!
What’s wrong with her?

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Ok! Enough already!! Why is it, a very common saying is twisted as some sort of smear when it’s said in a political arean. Grow up people, it doesn’t really matter whether it was a democrat or republican who said it. It doesn’t matter whether it was man or a woman who said it. It doesn’t matter if it was a black or a white who said it. Why? Because we all know it’s saying that’s been used for a very long time that is simply being taken out of context and it wouldn’t be a big deal if the media wasn’t making it one.

Posted by: Vickie B | September 10, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Hey bfree,
The blog is called the Daily Kos. If you had ever been to it, you would know that.
Typical Republican talking about something he knows nothing about.
Claiming to be someone on a message board, doesn’t mean you are that someone.

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 10, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Victory, the reason I highly doubt Obama was referring to Palin is because of the wording.
If he had said something like, ” McCain’s campaign has suddenly shifted from “Experience” to “Change”. Palin, how many times has she flip-flopped on the earmarks? She can’t say one thing just to hide her record. Well, you know, they say you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’ll still be a pig.” Then THAT would seemed directed at Palin.
In the context, what seemed more like it was:
Bush’s failed policies= Pig
McCain and Palin saying they’re for change and how they will shake Washington despite following same policies= Lipstick.
So should McCain and Palin then be insulted that they are being compared to women’s cosmetics? Well, NO. Their POLICIES are the lipstick.

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

If the shoe fits (or in this case lipstick), Palin and McCain should wear it!

Posted by: San Diego Dave | September 10, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Issues Matter – I agree with your comment “Do issues such as the economy and Iraq matter? This is crazy.”

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | September 10, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

She can put lipstick on. He can say they put lipstick on a pig. He can say they put lipstick on a bulldog. What bothers you is that he is right.
I could go in any bowling alley in Southern Georgia and find 30 people better qualified than her, and they wouldn’t be connected to the secessionist party.

Posted by: Tecumsa | September 10, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

First of all, this is a big character issue. Don’t try to avoid it. After Gov. Palin’s great speech with the lipstick phrase, Obama’s comment revealed his low character. We don’t want such person in the White House.
On other issues, McCain’s economy plan is way better than Obamas. As for Iraq, McCain’s courageous support for troop surge (rather lose an election) revealed McCain’s excellent character.
Again, a leader’s character and judgement are much much more important in dealing with issues, than empty words.
For Gov. Palin, she is the most popular governnor in America now. I trust the wise people’s judgement in Alaska than the liberal media’s rumor against her.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Jack 1
I suggest you go to factcheck (remember, Cheney endorsed it) and have this fact checked (its under GOP Political convention spin II).
The laundry list of Palin’s distortion of her record as detailed there is FAR FAR FAR too long for me to paste it.
They also fact check McCain and the other GOP convention speakers.
Let’s just say that the McCain, Palin and co. have declared war on the truth.

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 10, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

(Well said, Rick! I hope the leftist will learn. But I doubt Obama will ever. He even boast he has more executive experience than Palin does. What a blind joke!

Posted by: TJustSaying | September 10, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Are you more upset about this comment than the current state of our nation’s economy? The RNC uses these distractions because they think that most Americans are not smart enough to care about the real issues that affect them.
Everyone knows this is a commonly used phrase. McCain used it. Obama used. Let’s move forward and talk about issues.

Posted by: SET | September 10, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

WHY DOESN’T SHE JUST ADMIT THAT SHE IS A PIG!
WE ARE ALL TIRED OF PRETENDING THAT SHE IS NOT!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Wow Victory,
You are a dyed in the wool Republican. I asked you point blank to name ONE problem Palin solved, and you say its not about issues, its about character.
People of character don’t lie through their teeth.
Everyone should go to factcheck. It’s very very informative.

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 10, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Obama lost my vote yesterday—-Not because he may or may not have called Palin a pig—-but because he PROMISED to CHANGE the ugly, mud swinging political fighting and calling someone (or anything) a PIG is immature and not something I want to hear from my future President. I would have expected such words from the GOP, but not him. Obama proved to me that he’s unable to handle challenges like the gentleman he claims to be. What he said was mean spirited and nasty. EVERYONE in that audience and at home knew exactly what he was saying. Now that he’s decided to stoop down to the gutter with the others, I’m going to go with the one that has more experience. I don’t want a President that throws a tantrum and lashes out whenever someone gets in his way—just like Bush!

Posted by: angela | September 10, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Obama responds in VA:
Obama came out and called the McPalin’s latest outcry for what it is
a “made up controversy” and “foolish diversions”. He points out they are not talking about the future but following the same script they follow every four years. He mentions all the problems we ARE facing as a nation such as the energy crisis, broken educational system, two wars, shoddy care for Veterans, etc. and closes the statement with “and they want to talk about this”…He goes on to say “It’s not the Democrats or Republicans that will lose because of this, its YOU, the people that lose.”
He asks if we need another year or another four or eight years without talking about the issues.
He ratchets it up a notch with
“I love this Country too much to let them take over with lies, misdirection, and swift boating. These are serious times and they call for serious debate”.
He then proceeds to hammer home that McCain supports all of Bush’s most egregious policies like infrastructure problems and the Iraq war. He says
“McCain supports these policies, he believes them. There’s not a dimes difference between them”
He closes that segment with this gem:
“Spare me the phony outrage, phony talk about change, we have real problems, we need real answers;
not distractions, diversions and manipulations.”
So you see, they get no apology, no backing down and no capitulation. They get smacked down and made to look completely foolish and petty, just as predicted. This man will not be swiftboated, this should be painfully apparent to EVERYONE by now. He reels them in and wallops them with their own foolishness.

Posted by: Bob | September 10, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

LIPSTICK has been a catch phrase with Palin since her speech at the convention. Obama knew what he was doing. To hear Obama say “stop the phony outrage” is absolutely obnoxious and arrogant.

Posted by: d | September 10, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

McGrampy used the same term during the primaries; so what does that make him? Hmmmmm…..a HYPOCRIT!

Posted by: CinciDarling | September 10, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Alright then Victory, we shouldn’t have double standards then. What applies to Obama should apply to Palin and McCain too.
Let’s judge them on their character:
McCain- called Chelsea Clinton a dog and said she was ugly. Called his wife a **** in a fit of rage.
Palin-Belittled community organizers, threw sharp barbs that questioned Michelle Obama’s patriotism.
Obama-DEFENDED Palin’s religious views and said her children should be off-limits. Said they should respects other people’s religions.

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Dee Dee Lynn, you just don’t get it. Character is a big issue. I trust McCain and Palin’s character and judgement way more than Obama’s. Look at how many “present” he voted on those tough “issues”!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

A Concerned American – I absolutely agree with every sentence in your post except “This is what our declining education system has brought us.” My OPINION is that this is a case education teaching one thing and political parties doing the opposite. Both parties demonstrate repeatedly that truth and honest will get you nowhere. You have to lie and distort the truth to succeed in politics. Therefore, whoever does the best job of lying and distorting gets to run the country. No wonder we have the government we do. Kids are smart! They know what our adult leaders are doing.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | September 10, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

This outcry over Obama’s statement is absolutly ridiculous. It is obvious that the Republican party is using this as a tactic to draw away from real issues. Anything the Democrats say is spun to create a negative comment about McCain or Palin. It’s amazing that a group that prides themselves with confronting a “culture of victimization” has turned themselves into victims. If that is not dishonest, I don’t know what is. Let’s stop worrying about who called whom what and start talking about issues that matter: the war, the economy, social security, etc.
BTW, if you would like an opinion about Gov. Palin from a Wasilla native, Google “note from Anne Kilkenny.” The “note” explains why Anne thinks that Gov. Palin would not change D.C. politics for the better. This is an example of the type of discussion we should be having, not the standard ad hominem attacks that appear much too often on these comment boards.

Posted by: Reality in NJ | September 10, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I was listening to the whole thing and may have heard it differently. I thought the comment was prefaced by “You know there has been a lot of talk about lipstick lately” and then he made the comparison. If that is true then the attack was a direct shot. I wish I had recorded it. I can’t find it anywhere…news agencies-help!

Posted by: Linda Brooks | September 10, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

This outcry over Obama’s statement is absolutly ridiculous. It is obvious that the Republican party is using this as a tactic to draw away from real issues. Anything the Democrats say is spun to create a negative comment about McCain or Palin. It’s amazing that a group that prides themselves with confronting a “culture of victimization” has turned themselves into victims. If that is not dishonest, I don’t know what is. Let’s stop worrying about who called whom what and start talking about issues that matter: the war, the economy, social security, etc.
BTW, if you would like an opinion about Gov. Palin from a Wasilla native, Google “note from Anne Kilkenny.” The “note” explains why Anne thinks that Gov. Palin would not change D.C. politics for the better. This is an example of the type of discussion we should be having, not the standard ad hominem attacks that appear much too often on these comment boards.

Posted by: Reality in NJ | September 10, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

This panic response to Gov. Palin, (who I guarantee you is much smarter & sharper than the comment from another on finding smarter candidates in a bowling alley) reminds me of the Salem Witch Hunt. I’m so sick of all the nasty comments by the Obama team. It’s all smoke and mirrors people. I predict it’s going to backfire on them. Lets show some class! When GMA’s own George S. has to remind Obama that he’s Christian, not Muslim, so how is he an unbiased reporter? I’ve always chosen GMA over the others, but they appear to have jumped on the “Let’s get Sarah Bandwagon” too.

Posted by: red in the desert | September 10, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Why is it that whem Obama starts fighting back at McCain/Palin it labeled as being harsh. However as long as she and McCain in putting Obama down its okay. No! Wrong answer! Obama has the right to strike back at them as long as they seem to put him down. The media and all of you haters needs to accept all comments from both sides because you all are beginning to seem very racial.

Posted by: newsboy | September 10, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Why is it that whem Obama starts fighting back at McCain/Palin it labeled as being harsh. However as long as she and McCain in putting Obama down its okay. No! Wrong answer! Obama has the right to strike back at them as long as they seem to put him down. The media and all of you haters needs to accept all comments from both sides because you all are beginning to seem very racial.

Posted by: newsboy | September 10, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

McCain repeatedly took on his own party’s wrong doings. McCain repeatedly expressed his respect to Obama, even in his conventional speech. McCain certainly has the right to attack the judgement, experience, and faulty policy plan of Obama. But he will never say such nasty comments like Obama did.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Obama, is right the Pig joke is so old. Their were a lot of old timers in that crowd yet they laughed just as heartily as the young pups. He comes across as if he is so alert and sensitive. He should have been more alert that that joke is just not that funny to have brought that kind of laughter. Maybe he is just hedonistic enough to think that his delivery of it made it his own and that he is the most funny man in history. I am a hard core conserative and I laughed right aslong with them. Even if he meant nothing by it he should be mature enough to know that it could certainly have a double meaning. I grew up in Iowa. Pigs are really sweet and way more enduring than pitbulls. I do not think that he should appoligize. I think the main press should for being so much in the tank for him. He should then grow up and realize then that every thing is on the table. if his wife stumps for him then ,she has willing put herself up to get sniped at

Posted by: BRIAN TURNER | September 10, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

my God are we really this stupid to actaully say anything more than Please it is a figure of speech. and get over it..noone called mccain’s wife a dope head except George Bush and now they are bosom buddies… this is not news.. in reality a pitbull with lipstick is still a pit bull. what matters is he is biting you or fighting for you the truth is the RNC lipstick wearing pitbull is fighting for the $4 million dollar a year middle class dummy..you are not even included and you are argueing for mccain.palin and the RNC they very criminals who created THIS MESS !!!

Posted by: MARIO | September 10, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Simple. We are FED UP with the McCain supporters taking potshots and telling half-truths at Obama, with Palin making snide remarks belittling Obama’s work as a community organizer, and now when Obama gets harsher, the camp becomes crybabies sobbing how Obama has bullied them and is sexist!
If you want to fight dirty, be prepared to get splattered with mud in return!

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!
the level of intellect in this country is abysmal . never changes either. i remember , clear as yesterday…
“LETS ALL VOTE FOR RONNY REAGAN !!!!!”
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!

Posted by: bah | September 10, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Sarah does not need to bother to argue and defend herself from such nasty comments. Her silence showed her character. But she dose have the right to demand apology from Obama!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

I think the outrage is manufactured.
If Obama had been talking about Palin
he would have said “You can put lipstick on a Moose .. but its still a Moose”
Or “You can put lipstick on a pitbull.. but its still a pitbull”.
Phony outrage. But then that was one of many reasons they chose Palin for VP.
Easy to use as a symbol

Posted by: CaptainStormfield | September 10, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Let’s not forget McCAIN called his wife a “****”. How despicable is that and where is the noise standing up for Cindy you bigoted Republican no issue hypocrites.

Posted by: Dan | September 10, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

While I agree, the pig anaology has been taken WAY TOO FAR, this information is so slanted its hard to know where to draw the line. The post is not at all subtle in crafting the McCain supporter into being completely ignorant. I am a no-party voter who is having a very hard time this election deciding who to vote for. Despite the advances in technology, it seems finding an ubiast view point on the issues and a canidate is close to impossible.

Posted by: Gracie | September 10, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

DISTRACT, Deregulate, Bail out … sigh
Can we please discuss issues now?

Posted by: SET | September 10, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Obama knew exactly what he was saying and so did his audience. He even gave a dramatic pause, before finishing the statement.
Yes, the phrase “lipstick on a pig” may of been around forever, but he was certianly using it because of Palin. He is the one that can’t stand any heat and cries foul, but he doesn’t have a problem dishing it out.

Posted by: Lee | September 10, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Victory – Many McCain supporters are calling Obama a terrorist.
I’d much rather be called a pig, monkey, pitbull, even a jackass.
I never heard Obama say “Sarah Palin is a pig with lipstick”. This entire argument is ridiculous.

Posted by: Cindy | September 10, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Victory – Many McCain supporters are calling Obama a terrorist.
I’d much rather be called a pig, monkey, pitbull, even a jackass.
I never heard Obama say “Sarah Palin is a pig with lipstick”. This entire argument is ridiculous.

Posted by: Cindy | September 10, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

I hope that Barack Obama does not fall into the same trap that the Bush campaign set for Al Gore and John Kerry, which is calling foul. Sarah Palin is interviewing for the second highest job in the nation, yet she can’t be critiqued or the republicans will cry sexism. As a female veteran, I’m insulted, most women don’t get that opportunity when we seek a job that’s outside of the “conventional” female position. John McCain has found an alternative to the “he’s been a POW for 5 years” excuse; to the “you can’t say that, she’s a woman”. One other point, I’m I the only one who’s sees John McCain standing behind his running mate? Who’s running for President anyway?

Posted by: Theresa | September 10, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

The PIG demands an apology! Sorry she can’t have one.
When will she come out like a WOMAN and answer some questions?
Until she answers a few questions, we don’t know what she is! I’LL BET SHE’S A PIG.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Palin and Hillary Clinton both have played the gender card shamelessly. It is disgusting but we have far too much at stake to get side tracked by silliness.

Posted by: fred knutz | September 10, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Cindy, have you ever heard McCain calling Obama a terrorist? He is not a terroist. Several speakers in the RNC calling Obama “patriotic”. I am sorry they are not exactly right, either, after revealing thousands of American flags throwing in trash by the dem convention.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

This is political gamemanship. Obama doesn’t deserve this attack. He didn’t bring it on himself. He didn’t start the name calling. This is a silly stunt. I hope it backfires.

Posted by: Sean O'Brien | September 10, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I PERSONALLY SAT DOWN TO A BIG OLD PLATE OF BACON WITH OBAMA.
HE ATE IT!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

How about that Iraq war? What’s new with that? How many soldiers died this week? … perspective, people. Perspective.

Posted by: Independent Minds | September 10, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

is it just me , or does anyone else think that cross eyed palin looks like the biggest r/wing ultra conservative to come down the pike in quite some time? talk about a yes woman ,she will vote lock step with mccain on every issue there is.
someone needs to explain to her about birth control too , having 5 kids (one with an illegitimate child on the way ) makes her look even less intelligent to me.
and man o man , she looks like she is ready to put the jw bobbett on any creature that gets on her ( i would say “massive” would be an understatement )bad side , including hubby!
i would most definitely not want to be mr palin for any length of time …HELL ON EARTH !

Posted by: bah | September 10, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

You know, looks like Jane Swift’s plan backfired.
They have now effectively associated pigs with Sarah Palin, judging from the comments here and elsewhere. Oh dear.

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

I came here to talk about a PIG. And you know who it is.
See you decided that it was her, because it’s just obvious. It’s not like I blame you for covering it up. But you know you are covering it up, because you can’t stand to admit it.
You won’t let her talk to the press because you know she will start SQUEELIN!
What’s wrong with her?!!!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Does anyone have elementary reading skills anymore? He was talking about McCain’s policy. Unless Palin is part of Republican policy Obama owes squat. Another in what will be a long line of manufactured distractions or wedge issues to hide any discussion of real issues. If the women of America take offense it should be at McCain’s obvious
lack of respect for their intelligence.

Posted by: garnet6 | September 10, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

We have less than one month left until the general election, and there is absolutely no reason to read, listen, or watch the media about the candidates anymore. There is just too much spin at this point.
This election process has reduced the media to a worthless entity. It is clear that they are not unbiased. It is clear that the media is being paid to say what the candidates want to be said.

Posted by: abc | September 10, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Ironic isn’t it? They hit at Obama for “calling Palin a pig” when the “pig” he was talking about was Bush’s policies.
Now look what has happened, people are now REALLY calling her a pig. Well done.

Posted by: Woman | September 10, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Metaphors are NOT meant to be interpreted literally. If Palin is a “tough gal” then how can she be a victim too? I think she can handle it, can you? C’mon gals, both Republicans and Democrats, the ‘pity pot’ is getting crowded.
In 2000 the late Governor Ann Richards (in case you didn’t notice, a female herself) said, “You can put lipstick on a pig and call it Monique, but it’s still a pig.” referring to Bush 1 administration. She got a roaring laugh from the crowd, is that sexist?
As a woman, I find it insulting to suggest that I would be offended by such a silly colloquial metaphor, however as a ‘community organizer’ for Catholic Charities I am offended that someone would discount the value of my work and claim I have no responsibilities. Governor Palin called herself a pit bull with lipstick. Which is worse, a pig or a pit bull? Pit bulls are banned in my city but not pigs.

Posted by: Alice | September 10, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Victory: You are asking us to ignore what the supporters calling Obama a terrorist since it didn’t come from McCain’s mouth, yet you hold Obama responsible for what the cleaning crew did at the DNC? Your argument is pretty weak.
You did NOT hear Barrack Obama say that Sarah Palin is a pig. What you heard was Barrack Obama using John McCain’s line when referring to Hillary Clinton’s health care plan.
So I guess it’s ok for John McCain to say this line, but sexist, rude and demeaning when Barrack Obama says it? It can’t be both ways. Where is your outrage towards John McCain for saying the exact same thing?
REGARDLESS – the real issues aren’t about name calling – we have a war we are fighting and killing our soldiers and Iraqi citizens every day and a country and its people who are going bankrupt. Those are the issues that the McCain camp is concerned we ARE going to focus on, which is why they distract us with his nonsense.

Posted by: Cindy | September 10, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Obama has been handling campaign questions and national issues for about 18 months. Palin has been handling Alaska campaign questions and Alaska state issues for at least 20 months. About three weeks ago McCain selected Palin and said she was more qualified than Obama. So why is McCain being cautious about her talking about national issues. Does he not trust Palin yet or does he know she really isn’t qualified on national issues?

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | September 10, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

In Africa, they say “No matter how long a piece of wood stays under the water, it never becomes a crocodile”.
It is clear to me that the Republicans themselves believe the Gov is a pig, otherwise that would not be their first reaction.
Because of politics and Sarah P, some old expressions must be banned now? What’s wrong with you people?
No matter what the outcome of this election is, the American people will get what they deserve.

Posted by: Eddy | September 10, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Obama knew EXACTLY what he was doing and so did the crowd. HE is the sexist pig. He pretends to say her family is off limits while behind the scenes, his political engine is going after her.
I would love to see him debate her! I’ll be counting all the “ummms and uhhhs” as he stammers along….
I wasn’t a big McCain before, but now he has my vote with Palin on the ticket. I won’t stand for sexism toward Hillary or Sarah. Whether it’s Obama or his campaign…they are one in the same.
Doesn’t really change the bottom line that he is weak in experience and Hillary or McCain were better choices.

Posted by: Denise | September 10, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Cindy, you confused two issues. First, I gave the observation that more O fans HERE are using dirty words than McCain supporters. You coud not deny that. Then, I gave the observation that McCain’s character is better than Obama’s. Well, that maybe my personal judgement, but given what Obama has said, fewer people will doubt that. McCain/Palin ticket is way better choice!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Obama is trying to make a fool of the Americn people. He meant what he said. I bet Biden is saying, what the hell have I gotten myself into.

Posted by: C Good | September 10, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

That’s right Denise, you were looking for a reason not to vote for Obama and you just got one lol.
He is the only man in his house, surrounded by his wife and 2 daughters, yet he is so “sexist” that he calls Sarah Palin a pig. Give me a break!
If that’s the real reason why some people would vote against Obama, then we(the American People) are really (and I mean really) that stupid to even think of electing Bush the third time.

Posted by: Eddy | September 10, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Why then do you keep your PIGS hidden? They trot out upon a stage in magic light and pronounce as men. Yet in feeble afterthought, grunt again and retreat to the shadows.
What’s wrong with her?!!!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Victory: You are incorrect in your statement that 0 fans here are using dirty words. I’ve already responded to one McCain supporter, JimRod, who has repeatedly called Obama a terrorist. Perhaps you should go back and read, since it appears you’ve missed the name calling by the McCain supporters.
I am perplexed how you are using the argument that McCain’s character is better than Obama’s because of the lipstick analogy (both have used), or perhaps you are referring to McCain saying Obama is patriotic at the RNC (which you disagree with now based on the actions of the cleaning crew at the DNC). I watched the DNC and RNC in full. I heard Obama and his supporters often refer to respecting McCain for his service to the country, while I heard the McCain, Palin and their supporters mock Obama for his service to his community.

Posted by: C | September 10, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

It appears that ever since John McCain became the quarterback for the Republican Party, Karl Rove has been designing the plays on the sidelines.
It’s disgraceful, and I question the intellegence of the person who can’t see through this.

Posted by: ryaple | September 10, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Either Obama with his aledged intellectual prowess was going for a cheap laugh at Palin’s expense by his ‘pig’ remark and then instead of apologizing he tried to tap dance out of it or he’s much too stupid to be President for not seeing where such a remark would lead. Take the teleprompter away and he’s either a babbling moron or a sexist elitist. As for Obama being a terrorist, I am in moral terror that he might actually still have a shot at being President.
That’s right i said ‘tap dance’.
An old expression the same as the pig reference
As for being able to think on his feet, doesn’t anyone remember how Hillary cleaned his clock in their first debate. He was the definitive deer in the headlights. I remember thinking at that moment, if he can’t stand up to Hillary, he’s won’t be able to stand up to our enemies.
Jeez people wake up, he’s a lightweight.
EB

Posted by: Edmund | September 10, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Stay focused people!!! McCain and Palin are avoiding the issues.
WHAT ARE THE ISSUES?
Healthcare is being sliced while its costs are soaring
Home Foreclosures/Bankruptcies
Investment companies padding their books to show false profits
CUTS in federal programs which affects state funding for programs
Soaring Unemployment
Jobs Outsourced Overseas (this country still prefers slave labor)
Employers hiring citizens w/o legal work papers (again, slave labor)
Poor Funding of Education (Every state has its Corridor of Shame)
Poor Construction of roads and bridges
Hungry and Homeless populations (increased in families and women with children)
No Aid/Slow Aid to Disaster Victims in United States
Tax Breaks for the Wealthy while singles, seniors, and middle-class get nothing
Single Taxpayers w/o children not living to draw social security and not able to designate
a beneficiary
Address how parents/guardians of children with special needs often have to stop working, especially in the first few years of their children’s lives, because their babies’ immune systems are weak and require extensive medical treatment and medications. Medicare is a major healthcare provider and/or supplement for children and adults with special needs. The average single parent and/or married couple doesn’t earn a governor’s salary or a senator’s salary to cover medical treatments. Healthcare needs and costs often force families into bankruptcy, foreclosure, and homelessness.
Let’s talk about seniors being forced to choose food, shelter and utilities over medicine and/or medical treatment. Although many seniors have signed up for both Medicaid and Medicare, life changes create hardships that should not jeopardize their health benefits. Disable and special needs adults on both Medicaid and Medicare are not in the position to delay healthcare.
Able bodied workers have healthcare crises and need assistance. Take a look at any of the major credit reporting agencies and count the number of medical collection agencies that are listed.

Posted by: Chip | September 10, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

BACON for OBAMA!
That’s what you are worried about isn’t it. That Obama is not what you call him and that he actually eats pork.
So now the PIG is out of the blanket and you don’t know why people are having such fun at her expense.
We are not really laughing at her. We are laughing at you for being such a committed ideologue, and how vulnerable you are to criticism of the lightest impact.
What’s wrong with her?!!!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Obama supporters, by echoing Obama and calling McCain/Palin “pigs”, you are humiliating yourselves with such nasty words! Did you see that just now even Obama is denying it? He dosn’t have the guts to admit and apologize, and tries to avoid. But you guys are exposing his intention of insulting Palin and women!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Let’s face it, Obama is on the defense today playing the victim, but he is the one that brought up the “pig” remark. It was very elementary and shows how desperate he is that the poll numbers are no longer in his favor.
If you look at the video, you can see that the remark was deliberate. He said” If you put lipstick on a pig, (crowd roars and laughs while he pauses for effect), then he says, “it’s still a pig”. The crowd starts chanting Palins name.
McCain and Palin, aren’t dwelling on the subject, they are at their rallies today talking about the issues, despite Obama still talking about the pig remark at a school today. Very inappropriate subject to talk about at a school.

Posted by: S Adams | September 10, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

PORK-BARREL PALIN!
That of course rings true.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Let’s face it, Obama is on the defense today playing the victim, but he is the one that brought up the “pig” remark. It was very elementary and shows how desperate he is that the poll numbers are no longer in his favor.
If you look at the video, you can see that the remark was deliberate. He said” If you put lipstick on a pig, (crowd roars and laughs while he pauses for effect), then he says, “it’s still a pig”. The crowd starts chanting Palins name.
Well said, S Adams!
McCain/Palin give the real solutions to issues! When Obama was only attacking issue of Iraq with a defeatist tone, McCain was solving the problem by advocating for troop surge, risking his election!
Palin is the most popular governor in America with solid works done!
Good job, McCain/Palin!
————–
McCain and Palin, aren’t dwelling on the subject, they are at their rallies today talking about the issues, despite Obama still talking about the pig remark at a school today. Very inappropriate subject to talk about at a school.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

One other thing about Republicans that you can count on – they have a malnourished sense of humor. Seems they can only laugh at someone else’s expense.
I didn’t see the Democrats crying after the convention, but the Republicans went wild after the press to keep them out of Palin’s business.
They can dish it out but they can’t take it.
What’s wrong with her?!!!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

People say she’s a babe but she ain’t nearly as brave and noble as the pig “Babe”

Posted by: Sally | September 10, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

I came here to talk about a PIG. And you know who it is.
LOL! That’s what this discussion is about. We are talking about your hidden PIG.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Fed, was she corn fed?

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

I’m afraid this pig isn’t corn fed but lives on meat, like the ones on Deadwood.
Not a nice pig.
Not a credit to pigdom

Posted by: Sally | September 10, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

AMERICA’S EYES ARE WIDE SHUT
ITS SO EASY FOR SOME PEOPLE TO TAKE THINGS OUT OF CON TEXT SOME OF YOU PEOPLE NEED TO JUST COME OUT AND SAY WHAT YOU REALY ARE OR HOW YOU REALY FEEL AND PLEASE DONT USE RELIGION THATS THE OLDEST EXCUSE IN THE BOOK REMEMBER JESUS SEEKED OUT FOR THE PEOPLE WHO NEEDED HIM HE DIDNT ROLL WITH THE OTHER PREIST AND SCHOLARS SO HE COULD LOOK GOOD. YOUR AFRAID

Posted by: TIP FOR THE DAY | September 10, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Obama clearly thinks the American public is “dumber than dirt” – another saying for any of you elitists not clinging to your guns or religion right now.
The democrats were pretty good this time around and the pie-in-the-sky rhetoric on what we are going to do to help all you poor people without any facts “almost” worked. There have only been two democratic presidents elected in the past 45 years and there is a reason for this!
You are out of touch with American and you are very mean and classless individuals. I would be ashamed to be part of the democrat party and to have this man be your candidate of choice. He is classless and clearly not funny.
Not very bright either. When he doesn’t have his speech written out for him in advance with the aid of teleprompters, he just stutters, hims and haws and around, and comes out with stuff like this. EEGADS! Help us!!!!
Thank goodness we still have time before he becomes our President and is speaking with foreign leaders! God only knows what he will say…

Posted by: mjwilson | September 10, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I wonder if Martin Luther King jr. would agree with Mr. Obama… I think Not.. Because MLK was a Republican.

Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 10, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

That was a good one bah about the dictonary, but you forgot to look besides the definition of pig and she was there too-just in lipstick and glasses!
mccain and camp needs to stop being so thin skinned. where was all the fuss when he made the same remark. now that obama says it people want to get their drawers twisted in a knot. she needs to go back to alaska and try and ban some more books. better yet she needs to think for herself and stop saying the same things that the speech writers write for her to say. maybe thats why we haven’t heard anything from her-she’s speechless. pig palin go home.
and i am a female and i didnt vote for clinton and won’t vote for her. they think cause they got a woman they expect the female vote? they could have done better than that pit bull!

Posted by: terryswifey | September 10, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

I will have lost all faith in the american people if McCain winds up in the White House… 9 trillion in debt, 10 billion a month spent in Iraq, thousands of american soldiers lost in this useless war, global warming, our crappy economy. And what are people arguing about? Lipstick on a pig…

Posted by: stank | September 10, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Isn’t anyone out there worried about John McCain’s judgement? He spends entirely most of his time on name calling and when it happens back the response is “how dare they”. We are in dire straights here folks and all he and the republicans focus on small things and not issues. Say anything enough times, even a lie, and people will believe it. I heard that Mr. McCain stated that he makes quick judgements and is willing to pay the consequences. Gee, I sure want someone in the position of president with that approach. I question on whether or not we can trust his judgement. I just wonder what effect five years as a prisoner of war (brave as he is)has had on his judgement and perspective on the world. Now now, I am an american and I do have the right to ask these questions. I sat back for 8 years and listened and I am now going to have my say, thank you very much.

Posted by: Bobby Benson of the B-B | September 10, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Speaking of pigs???? Where is George Worthless Bush?? The biggest pig of them all.

Posted by: P-51 jock | September 10, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

GOp just wanted this discussion as a show, to avoid discussion on issues, where it is sam PIG, sam Bush.

Posted by: Linda,Fl | September 10, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

AMERICA’S FATAL ATTRACTION WITH SARAH PALIN CONTINUES:
Let’s look into the crystal ball and see what America looks like if McCain/Palin ticket is elected:
A.The Iraq war will continue 12 billion a month of your tax money going to support this terrible war. Also more American dead soldiers coming home.
B.The un-employment rate will increase 6.1% to 10% under the McCain Admin.
C.Higher and higher budget shortfalls from 407 billion to 1 trillion.
D.No freedom of choice with Palin and McCain in your daughter is raped or impregnated by a family member your daughter will be forced to have that child.
E.McCain will want to bomb Iran, which will send oil prices above 200.00 a barrel. You and I will be paying close to seven dollars a gallon for gas.
F.The public school system will continue to fall apart. This means more crime more gang violence and hate.
G.More of your jobs will be sent overseas, so more of you will have to work two or maybe three jobs to keep up.
THIS IS WHAT I PREDICT IF AMERICA’S FATAL ATTRACTION WITH SARAH PALIN CONTINUES. THIS WILL BE FATAL FOR AMERICA IF MCCAIN AND PALIN ARE ELECTED.

Posted by: mase | September 10, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON A TERRIST SYMPATHIZER AND IT IS STIL SEN OBAMA!

Posted by: nookly23 | September 10, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

“John McCain’s daughter Meghan is not taking offense to Barack Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” line like the rest of her father’s campaign, pointing out Wednesday morning that GOP presidential nominee has been known to use the phrase.
“I’ve heard my dad say that, the term ‘lipstick on a pig,’” McCain said during an appearance on Fox promoting her new children’s book about her father.”
Ooops! Guess they forgot to give McCain’s daughter they day’s fake outrage! LOL

Posted by: patwal | September 10, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Its people like nookly23 that make me lose faith in the american people. How can there still be people like him around?!

Posted by: hubba | September 10, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

HUBBA: if you do not think Obama is a terrorist sypathizer, I would like you to explain Obama’s friends. His mentor the racist Wright says America deserved what happened on Sept 11. His buddy Bill Ayers whose home he use to launch his state senate run and his group planted bombs in govnment builds. Definition: Terrorism is “the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.” Sound pretty clear. If it were not for people like me, you would not have the right to spout your views. If someone who hates America is allowed to lead it, i too will lose hope in this country. It is disturbing that people such as yourself are so willing to follow and to beleive that you will ignore facts. Ignorance is bliss as they say and you must be bliss.

Posted by: nookly23 | September 10, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

When first the GOP apologize for the last 8 years of Bush/Cheney and for torture or when the neather world freezes over which ever comes first -then Obama can consider an apology. The nerve of the slanderous, evil, repugnant, repubs wanting an apology for something that is a phrase commonly used. This is the height of hypocrisy and just plain juvenile to say the least. Grow up Republicans – Grow up – I can no longer tolerate your juvenile behavior! Why don’t the Repubs apologize to the group Heart fopr using their music without permission? they have plenty of apologizing to do – they need to look in the mirror once in a while to see all the dirt they wear!

Posted by: eyeonyou | September 10, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

Wow! Did I wander into the moveon blogoshere?! I have never read such vile hate-mongering in my life! The Democratic party is SUPPOSED to be the party of ‘inclusion,’ but all I have witnessed for the last 16 months is that if you agree with the Dems you are in, but if you disagree with the Dems you are not only OUT, but you are vilified, kicked in the groin, tied to the back of a pickup truck and dragged through the mud for 10 miles and then pumelled to within an inch of your life!!
I am extremely happy to announce my family and I will be distancing ourselves from the mentality that has become the Democratic party and proudly voting for the McCain-Palin ticket.
Keep up the good works guys, the more you act like disgusting immature monsters, the more normal people will want to distance themselves from the party of hate, and you just may be the people responsible for putting McCain in the White House!

Posted by: mailndr | September 10, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Obama didn’t even apologize for the misinterpretation that offended wonderful women all across the country, even is he didn’t actually mean what he said as a dig towards Sarah Palin, an apology would have been in order to show sincerity and understanding how what he said could have been interpreted as sexism. “crocodile tears” in referring to Hillary Clinton” in my opinion was very sexist towards Hillary and women all across the country, the fact that a women might be more vulnerable to express her emotions by a tear does not imply in any way that she is “weak” and incapable to lead and make the “tough” decisions this country needs. If you sit back and listen and watch the way he presents himself he really does for the most part come across as sexist. It is very sad and dishonorable that a so called “professional ” man would conduct himself in such a way. Sarah Palin is a women and she has feelings like the rest of us do. I think the word “pig ” is one of the meanest words you could call a women. It insinuates they are fat and ugly. All women are beautiful, and if he expects people to look beyond the color of ones skin, then he should feel equally as strong as looking beyond a women’s gender . When was the last time we ever question whether a man can carry out the functions of the White House because he has children. I ask women of America to please support McCain -Palin because they have the proven record of making the kind of changes that America has been yearning for. Changes that we want without the flavor of sexism that Obama would bring.

Posted by: firebreather26 | September 10, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

People this is exactly what Obama wanted to do with this pig/lipstick comment. He is the poor pitiful one. If you can’t see this then I’m sorry for you.

Posted by: C Good | September 10, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

THE GOP HAS ONLY ONE STRATEGY: SPEW LIES AND SMEARS AND DISTRACT EVERYONE FROM THE MESS THEY HAVE MADE IN THE LAST EIGHT YEARS. WAKE UP, AMERICA! ENOUGH!

Posted by: FDR | September 10, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

When was the last time you saw a republican right winger rioting, destroying property threatening and causing harm to innocent people, fighting with police and just causing anarchy.

Posted by: firebreather26 | September 10, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

mia culpa? You mean like Sarah Palin requesting federal taxpayers dollars, then denying that she even requested the federal taxpayers dollars with her insisting that congress was pushing the money on her?

Posted by: mere | September 10, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

I will never forget her words: When congress wanted to give me the money for the Bridge to Nowhere I said thanks but no thanks. Sarah’s earmark and Sarah’s denial.

Posted by: mere | September 10, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

It really is a sad state of affairs when its come down to “he said — she said.” I’m more concerned with the prices of food and gas, my children’s education or lack of, how to pay the doctor which I can’t afford and who is going to help get this country back on its feet. Reading headlines about “Lipstick on a Pig” and “Palin’s glasses” — well, enough. Let’s get back to what’s at stake — our country. And it seems people have forgotten that it’s Obama and McCain running for President, not Obama and Palin.

Posted by: CSok107 | September 10, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I can’t believe how dumb people in this country have become! The Republicans have got their wish and have been laughing all the way to white house for 7 out the last 10 elections.They laud and encourage mediocrity to suit their devilish schemes.But, the press and the Dems always fall for it.How else, could Swift be allowed spew so much tortured logic?
The Dems need to learn what Bill Clinton had learned: Smack the hell of the Republicans when attacked.Don’t let even perceptions go unchallenged.Otherwise, the Republicans will establish a kingdom in this country.

Posted by: joseph pierre | September 10, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

Do you really want to talk substance? I really do too, but I am not talking the kind of substance that Obama smoked in his crack pipe. Listen in order to talk substance and a candidate you must first discover the fabric of which the candidate is made of. His character and morals may not be an issue to Move-on because they do not have regard for character and morals. I would like just one of you radical liberal anti- Americans to explain to me how a person who is running for the highest office in the country could possible launch his run for the Presidency from Bill Ayers home, who is a well known terrorist. Who to this day said “he wishes he had done more” He bombed federal buildings including the Pentagon and killed innocent Americans with his brand of hate and goal to overthrow the government.

Posted by: firebreather26 | September 10, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

That’s what we all love about you guys. Make up a story and stick with it.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Honestly-as the electorate isn’t it our job to be informed? Don’t we all have more important issues to discuss? Like the future of our fuel supply and the health of our environment, how to lower costs of food and all other products to match the average person’s budget, the improvement of our healthcare and educational systems, how to lessen the widening gap between the rich and poor in this country, the need for individuals and families to set personal and professional boundaries so we can cut the rate of stress related diseases and make our neighborhoods safe again, how we as a civil society can address the war on poverty and address the needs of the disenfranchised and indigent, resolving the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and preventing any new ones from starting, how can we improve our relationships with allies and restore our image on the world stage, etc. etc. plus- simply what we can do to as individuals in our daily lives to make this country a better place to live for everyone, after all we are all in this together-Republicans and Democrats. ENOUGH bickering!!!! Let’s talk about what really matters to all of us not this nonsense.
Metaphors are NOT meant to be interpreted literally. If Palin is a ‘tough gal’ then how can she be a victim too? I think she can handle it, can you? C’mon gals, both Republicans and Democrats, the ‘pity pot’ is getting crowded.
In 2000 the late Governor Ann Richards (in case you didn’t notice, a female herself) said, ‘You can put lipstick on a pig and call it Monique, but it’s still a pig.’ referring to Bush 1 administration. She got a roaring laugh from the crowd, is that sexist? Governor Palin called herself a pit bull with lipstick. Which is worse, a pig or a pit bull? Pit bulls are banned in my city but not pigs. It’s all so irrelevant and unimportant.

Posted by: Alice | September 10, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

If American women don’t find McCain/Palin’s tactics disgusting and insulting to women…then American women are just as stupid as Palin and McCain think they are.

Posted by: col. armstrong | September 10, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

The entire McCain Campaign is lipstick on a pig! Can’t you just hear, “I am John McCain and I approve of these lies.”

Posted by: Libratine | September 10, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

FDR–The only lies and smears are coming from the left. A good example of that is the photo-shopped pic of Palin in a bikini holding a rifle. This pic is all over the internet and even CNN picked up the story and put the picture on their station and announced as truth.
Not to mention the legions of lawyers Obama set out in Alaska to dig up dirt on Sarah Palin. All he’s been able to find is a librarian who said Palin banned some books, which was later proven false. The Democrats are desperate and sore losers. They know they made a mistake in putting all their apples in Obama’s basket so they are resorting to lies and photo-shopped pictures. Liberals are pathetic!

Posted by: S Adams | September 10, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

If McCain, Palin, and the GOP get so outraged and indignant about an offhand remark taken out of context, how would they react when Russia, or France, or Israel make an offhand remark about America??? Bomb them???

Posted by: dave | September 10, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

“Lipstick on a Pig” to quote Obama. Oh, the “Pork” in Barrell Obama carried to his home state to the tune of $1 Billion dollars in ear marks during his terms in the Senate (averaging $1million per working day — That’s Cha-Ching Change You can Believe In!)? Guess he could not leave that piggy bank behind and got a sweet kiss out of that baby! I wonder who taught him the ropes, led him through the process, showed him how..and he just went along! While the country deficit is spiraling.. he tacks on more without hesitation or regret. He has yet to denounce pork barrell spending! That’s the leader we want? You have got to be kidding! Thank goodness McCain doesn’t take pork barrell! And that’s no lie.

Posted by: Daniel G Garcia | September 10, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

The republicans are so desparate to turn this election into a personality contest becasue they don’t have any merit, ideas, plans or substance to run on! Their typical fear and SMEAR tactics are old and going to do them in!
Obama and Biden are honorable and professional candidates and will win by a landslide! Because Americans cannot be fooled 3 times in a row!

Posted by: Diane - Dallas, TX | September 10, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

It’s just another distraction by the GOP from real issues because they can’t stand on their own record. 8 years of republican rule under George W. Bush is 8 years too many. We don’t want another Bush. We don’t want McCain. We don’t want Palin. We don’t want Republicans. And there are a few Democrats out there that we don’t want either. The Dems are too wimpy to stand up to Bush. IMPEACH, for war crimes, for illegal wire-tapping, politicizing the justice dept. etc…

Posted by: Tired | September 10, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Well, how much did RUMSFELD and the boys steal from us for a WAR. They LIED to get us into a WAR.
If you don’t know what kind of PIG I’m talking about just look at the BUSH ADMINISTRATION.
WHAT’S WRONG WITH HER?!!!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Obama’s own words to belittle WOMEN: “Sweetie”, “Pig”, “Fish”, “Periodically down”. DUMP THIS SEXIST CHAUVINISTIC PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGG, WOMEN OF AMERICA!!!!

Posted by: ablanche08 | September 10, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Good call Jake. When those kinda words come from someone else it has no substance nor a question. But when Obama says it he his charge with calling a person out of their name. Well, I think McShame/Complain need to confess up to call peopleout of their names as well. McShame/Complain need to stop lying about their so called creditials.

Posted by: Teresa | September 10, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

This election is not about women. It’s about all of us. Besides I think she is really a PIG. You people would like everyone to shut up about it so you can waltz into the White House and have it as a PIG PARLOR for another term.
I’m against it.
What’s wrong with her?!!!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

The McCain campaign’s unbelievably good at lying and letting the media forget about it, by creating fake politics.
It’s about time the media took the responsibility to air the truth, rather than letting these guys get away with lying to the American public, from Obama’s tax plans to his religious convictions.

Posted by: Aung Kyaw | September 10, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

O.K. Lets get to the real issue here. Obama is running scared, as is Mr. Biden!! The “LADY” from Alaska is creating crowds like never before…And the crowds believe in her. “WHY”? Because she’s not politicing. She’s hitting head on, using words like yes & no … words which typical politicians fear. As a Rep. for many, many years , be she Dem Or Rep…..She’s refreshing and revitalizing the political process, …and that my friends is exactly what Mr. Obama fears most. He fears “REAL CHANGE” because it falls outside of the normal everyday political arena of today which will make him an outsider. Call her what you may, but to me she’s “The Sarahcudda” and I’m going to vote for her ticket, rain, sun or snow!

Posted by: t5z3g7 | September 10, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Diane–Honorable? What is honorable about photo-chopping pics of Palin in a bikini and rifle. What is honorable about the “pig and lipstick” remark clearly directed toward Palin, not because he said the old saying, but how is said and his audience even knew who he was talking about, they were chanting Palin in the crowd. What is honorable about his dirty dealings with slum lord Rezko, his terrorist associations with Ayers, his racist, home wrecker, cheating pastor, I could go on and on all day.

Posted by: S Adams | September 10, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Obama has no respect for women, including Hillary Clinton. Yes – he most definitely called Hillary Clinton a pig – now he expects her to support his campaign. He was also referring to Palin and McCain with the lipstick / fish comment. This will hurt his campaign. “Obama is not ready to lead but he is ready to smear.” Obama is an evil and dangerous man ??? who will do anything, ANYTHING, to get elected! The media is so bias and pro-Obama, it is sickening. McCain / Palin 2008

Posted by: Ashleigh | September 10, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

I came here to talk about a PIG. And you know who it is.
You think it’s a LADY swishing her tail around for you. You want to have a little lust session over her gams.
I notice you all are not above calling Obama a PIG. So what’s got you all worked up?
The White House has served as your PIG PARLOR for long enough now. It’s time to clean it up and do something that works for a change.
Slop your hogs at home.
What’s Wrong with her?!!!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

NORMAN
When did Obama call Hillary a pig? And what evil plans does Obama have for us? Saving us money on our taxes, improving our education, ending a wasteful, drawn out war.

Posted by: Rick | September 10, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Why should Barack Obama adjust his speech to appease a person who calls herself a pit bull. She introduced herself to America as a tough, trash- talking I can-take-it-like-a-man candidate. If little sarah can’t play with the big boys then she needs to go back home.
Gas is too high, people have no jobs. people…i’m just wasting my time because obviously you people do not care about anything except, lipstick

Posted by: weary | September 10, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Are you kidding me? Did any of you actually read JPT’s post? Here, he tells you — with attributions that you can check out — that the McCain campaign, its surrogates and supporters have deliberately twisted, spun or otherwise tried to mislead the public with their implausible interpretations of comments that anyone with functioning eyes and ears can tell belie the spin. Yet, partisan robots — seemingly lacking integrity or pride — refuse to insist that these creeps show something approaching honesty. Every time we close our eyes to slime-ball tactics, we implicitly condone and reward conduct that denigrates our democratic principles and ideals. It seems we’re on our way to getting precisely the government we deserve — again. How’s this: Every cable & broadcast news organization either (a) refuse to cover attacks/rebuttals/responses that contain lies or half-truths; or, (b) do their own “truth squad” report immediately following each such piece! It will take exactly 3 news cycles before the campaigns get it through their skulls that their lies will be “outed” instantly. Then, perhaps, we can stop worrying about Palin’s teens, lipstick jokes, or McCain’s verbal ticks (“My friends . . .”), and start assessing which of these two men is best suited to be the next President of the United States.

Posted by: screaminmeme | September 10, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Obama still continues to do stupid things like flip Hilliay the birdie and claim that he was just scratching his face, calls Palin a pig and claims it was just a saying, and what is his excuse for calling McCain an old smelly fish in the same speech?

Posted by: chattyway | September 10, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

See, all touchy!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Norman is doing a really good job reminding us constantly how insulting Obama’s word are.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

I can’t believe the Dem chairwoman of SC today said Palin was nominated only because she did not get an abortion. What is wrong with the Obama people? Are you really so dense that you don’t understand how insulting you guys are?

Posted by: chattyway | September 10, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

It turns out that Obama has put this whole question in its proper perspective.
According to him Palin is the lipstick and McSames vision for America is the pig.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

I want to know when ALL of you name callers on BOTH sides reduced your conversation to this low level? Is this really want you have strived to attain in life – being able to oink and snort at one another. HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN THAT YOU ARE AMERICANS? HAVE YOU FORGOTTEN SO SOON WHEN WE CAME TOGETHER AS A UNITED PEOPLE AFTER THE HORRENDOUS ATTACK UPON US – laying down our “name tags”, and just being Americans. Think about why there is such a concerted effort to divide us, and see the enemy is not your fellow American – it’s not Obama, it’s not McCain, it’s not Bush, it’s not the Clintons. Who do you think it is? Think. The ONLY power we have left as American people is to rise, and say YOU WILL NOT DIVIDE US. Our loyalty must be to each other, and not to some leader, some party, some organization that uses us to promote their cause. I challenge you to refuse to vote for any candidate that seeks to divide us. When we clear the halls of Congress of ALL those that continually bad-mouth our nation and our fellow citizens, we will be able to take back our country from those that seek to destroy it by reducing us to wallowing pigs.

Posted by: tiaa | September 10, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

The Republicans are so new to giving influence and power to women that they fall all over themselves when women are actually treated with equality.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

tiaa,
Sadly you are right. But this slop goes back at least 150 years. The bad thing is now the rest of the world can see how we go about making our critical decisions.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

It was precisely that moment when we trusted the Republicans to lead us, that they betrayed us.
IRAQ.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

nvm

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

So Leonard, don’t you and all the other Americans posting comments here think 150 years is long enough. We can decide that we’ve had enough of this trash talking, and we can begin to actually use the brains we were blessed with to engage each other in intelligent dialogue. How about it Norman? Maybe someone would like to have a conversation with you when you stop attacking everyone. ONLY YOU can make that choice, and ONLY YOU can decide to rise above the pig sty.

Posted by: tiaa | September 10, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Please oh please, can we get Obama back to reading speeches? His extemporanious remarks are just too embarrassing. It’s painful to see him floundering for something to say.

Posted by: mad4news | September 10, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Please oh please, can we get Obama back to reading speeches? His extemporanious remarks are just too embarrassing. It’s painful to see him floundering for something to say.

Posted by: mad4news | September 10, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

No the pig slop is on everything because the Republicans put it there. We can not rise above it.
We are in it and you want to feed it to US for another CENTURY.
NO, I don’t think you understand how tired we are of this slop!

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

tiaa,
Only two things will change it in the long run.
A parliamentary government and the media not being controlled by four corporations and I’m not holding my breath for that to happen.
The other thing is that it only takes one bigot to turn an intelligent discussion into a food-fight.
If you have the answer then you should
keep at it. You may be the only one who can save this country.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

WoW, just when I thought Republicans
couldn’t go any lower in the gutter to
retain power. Oh right, McCAin couldn’t get elected on his own, thus he had to
go fill his campaign with Bush/Rove
people. Here we go again. The permanent
campaign instead of governance.
Americans truly are stupid.

Posted by: Pogyak | September 10, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

Trotting out another happy little PIGGY doesn’t help.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Norman – are you able to look at the whole picture or are the walls surrounding you too high? BOTH parties agreed that this war was necessary. Just take a moment, and go back and look at their votes in the House and the Senate. You can pull it up on your computer, and check the facts for yourself. You don’t have to believe anyone else. You can get the facts for yourself, and if you have the courage, you can see TRUTH. It will liberate you. And by the way, what do all you people have against liberating the Iraqi people from tyranny? I just don’t understand the hatred that you have for the Iraqi people.

Posted by: tiaa | September 10, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

MLK was a Republican until the 1960 election, when he endorsed Kennedy, btw. Some dittohead got it wrong. Eisenhower was the last Republican president not hostile to civil rights. MLK saw the shift and rightly went along.
They’re trying to turn Obama into the Angry Black Man, but he’s having too much fun- as nailbiting as the whole thing is, I’m confident because the candidate who keeps laughing always wins.

Posted by: Maurizio | September 10, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Bottom line is…McCain is a liar. Palin is a liar. They have nothing to run on but lies and distortions. Keep everyone focused on BS so we don’t see that they have nothing to offer. Is this really who the pubs want to fight for? And being a woman I can say this without being sexist, looking at these women fawning over Palin is embarrassing. What exactly do they like about her. She’s got kids…wow, who doesn’t. She works…what woman doesn’t. Can’t be because she kills moose…who wants to. Her hair…duh, no. What is it? I don’t think they even know. They’re like a bunch of pods screaming because it’s easier than actually thinking. People please…VOTE IN NOVEMBER or we’ll be looking at these idiots for four years. Then God Help Us!

Posted by: goawayreds | September 10, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

nvm

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

THE PIG IS THE POLICY!
The only PIG here is the Policy of the McCain campaign of wallowing in the mud.

Posted by: anon | September 10, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

That is because the administration LIED to Congress. They could be prosecuted for MURDER once they are out of office.
If someone LIED to you to get you to support a war would you just take the blame for their lie?

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

tiaa,
I’d have to say that I don’t think the Iraqi people were ever the issue.
We don’t see the world that way.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

If the Republicans thought that the main reason we were there was to defend the rights of muslims you’d see them saying that Obama is a sympathizer because he wants a slow and measured troop withdrawal.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Dear mad4news: That “floundering for something to say” is actually called a “pause”. It’s commonly seen when a speaker who has not memorized his lines or talking points actually THINKS before uttering the next phrase. That is — it is usually a sign of intelligence, reflection or a speech impairment. Since Obama does not suffer from the latter, I leave it to you to pause, reflect and think about which of the other two alternatives is the case. PS: And, please — try not to hit the “Post” button twice next time.

Posted by: screaminmeme | September 10, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Thank you Leonard. I intend to try. The reason that we are in this state is that we have sat back, and hoped someone else would do it, and we’ve allowed ourselves to become ignorant of who the real enemy is. Norman, you are an American. I’m thankful that you have the freedom to spout your endless tirade, but aren’t you weary of the bitterness which seems to permeate every fiber of your being.

Posted by: tiaa | September 10, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

tiaa and NORMAN,
Norman I’m probably far to the left of you, but the difference is that I don’t think I’m going to change anyones mind in here.
On the outside chance that a uncommitted independent does happen to wander in, address your arguments to them and let the hate spew forth from elsewhere.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Oh no dear I have many more fibers. When the Republicans are out I going to call my Congressman and demand National Healthcare, and better Schools and tax breaks for people who make less than $250,000 per year, and an end to the IRAQ war. And when I get that you’ll see, I will stop pushing for a short while.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

While I agree with almost everything written here, it seems that we are preaching to the choir.
Hard as it is to believe, there is a great chunk of the populace that sees things through Palin’s glasses.
The challenge is not to convince the convinced, but to convert.

Posted by: rockyroad | September 10, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Norman, I’m sorry to say I must go, but what a pleasure engaging you in intelligent conversation. Go back during the Clinton administration, type in Iraq, and read what was being said at that time about Iraq by both political parties. You’ll be amazed by the facts I hope. Don’t forget to be challenged to learn the whole truth, and not just the side you agree with.

Posted by: tiaa | September 10, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Obama was obviously trying to call out McCain’s hypocrisy in trying to act like he’d bring change to Washington, but in reality McCain stands with the moron Bush 90% of the time. So completely obvious for those of us who complete 5th grade. Watch the video,
McCain’s campaign is utterly pathetic bringing out this garbage. And btw- for you metaphor-challenged 4th graders- let me assure you that by ‘garbage’ I was not referring to Jane Swift or your flat earth VP candidate… I was referring to the tripe they offer instead of solutions to America’s problems.
Keep the upper-cuts coming, Obama! McCain is going to fall hard.

Posted by: mgks | September 10, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

rockyroad,
That is the mission but it is a tall order. One of the parties gains power through divisiveness and discord, otherness, fear, character assassination and basically anything that plays to doubt, insecurity, envy and jealousy.
I’ve been kind of hoping on the incoming generation to make the difference but these things are apparently inherited.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Are Obama supporters, and his adoring media actually outraged over Obamas obvious insult to Palin? Funny, it was only last week that you were all basking in the unsubstantiated accusations about Governor Palin, her pregnant daughter,her family, and the two decades old D.U.I of her husband.

Posted by: Badger | September 10, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Wait a minute. The Bush administration’s claim of WMD in Iraq might be WRONG, but NOT LYING. The liers are those Iraqis who provided false intelligence. Bush genuinely believed WMD in Iraq when the war started. The simple logic is, if he was lying, he knew he will embarass himself without finding WMD.
No matter how much you dislike Bush, don’t lie about him.
No matter how much you dislike Bush, his administration is keeping terrorists on the run and keeping this country safe!

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

victory,
One word:
Curveball.
Remember him?
And yes, Mt. St.Helens hasn’t erupted again either.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Badger,
Are you one of those guys that secretly wants to get her in the sack?
She is a Hot Chick as your own party buttons claim.
Palin is the Lipstick
McSames ideas are the Pig.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

I will be happy to let a court decide who was LYING about IRAQ.
If they were being honest then the JURY will see the evidence and recognize it.
MURDER is a serious charge.

Posted by: NORMAN | September 10, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

The American Electorate have become like an abused spouse. Every time an election rolls around the repubs are there to tell you, this time I’ll treat you better than I did the last time. They will tell you how great is gonna be if you take them back because you see only they know how to protect you and keep you safe. Oh yeah, and they always come bearing gifts to distract you and take your mind off the last time they lied, abused and stolen from you. Well this time the GIFT is Sara Palin. To a person that stays with an abuser I say to them, the first time its the abuser’s fault. After the second time I say, why are you still there? And if they stick around for the third beating, then you deserve what you get!

Posted by: NoBlinders | September 10, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

victory-
You say that Bush didn’t lie about WMD in Iraq… rather that it was the intelligence sources that lied.
Well, whatever. Bush is the dupe who believed it. He is the incompetent clown who failed to listen to international inspection experts who were correct, and he was the failed strategist pathologically focused Saddam while the real killer Bin Laden is a free man to this day. COMPLETE FAILURE. For POTUS, that’s perhaps worse than being a liar.
And the new John ‘Bush’ McCain was right there with him every step of the way. From neglecting the right war in Afghanistan to starting a costly and useless war in Iraq (over 100,000 human beings killed and 1 trillion wasted for nothing). From the 5 trillion surplus to the 5 trillion deficit that has brought our economy to its knees. Do you really think we need more of this garbage leadership?
Wake up!

Posted by: mgks | September 10, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Great post NoBlinders!!!! RIGHT ON
Obama/Biden 08
For the survival of this wonderful country

Posted by: H8RightWingLunz | September 10, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Coverage of this phony reaction by the GOP to this comment on ABC is ridiculous. Cover the issues. Cover the issues. Cover the issues. OUR nation is in crisis.

Posted by: Mathilde | September 10, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Remember what Bill Clinton said to reporters as former president when Bush administration decided to go to war? You don’t need me to remind you that Bill is a democrat.
You have all the right to dislike Bush because this is a free country. Just don’t forget Bush administration has been keeping this country safe for these years. That’s why you still have this freedom and why the enemies hate America so much.

Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

Jake, just want to thank you for your report on ABC World News tonight. It’s the first time I’ve felt actual disdain coming from you for McCain’s tactics. I’ve felt that way for at least 2 months.

Posted by: DebM | September 10, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

And just where is Palin in all this?
Does Palin even know how to speak for herself?
If Palin can’t face her countrymen, how could she EVER face any of our foreign adversary?
I’m starting to wonder…

Posted by: jds | September 10, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

I’m glad Obama spoke out on the big missy piggy debate back off.
Matthew Dowd is right everyone will open and take a look at the real issues and and everyone will swing back to Obama give or take I will back Obama
he is for all Americans as I see the beautiful mind is for all.

Posted by: Gloria | September 10, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Isn’t it obvious to all that these mindless attacks coming from the McCain campaign all originate from the same people who smeared the old ex POW in the 2000 nomination fight?
The “maverick” has sold out to all the old Bush people who brought him down. What does that say for his integrity and honor? Indeed, when asked about his definition of “honor” recently, he could only reply, “read my book.” The book was written by his ghost writer and campaign advisor Mark Salter.
He has forgotten what the word means.

Posted by: Luke Gilmore | September 10, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

she’s not the PIG she’s the LIPSTICK.
and she’s an idiot.

Posted by: troy | September 10, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Why does Sarah Palin not talk to the media? If she is not ready for the pressure of the media then she is not ready for the pressure of being vice president. If a campaign refuses to let the media hold them accountable then THAT SHOULD BE THE FRONT PAGE STORY. If John McCain is SHIELDING Sarah Palin from the eyes of the media and thus the American people the THAT SHOULD BE THE FRONT PAGE STORY.All John McCain can do is CHANGE THE SUBJECT and REFUSE TO TALK ABOUT THE LAST 8 YEARS and why he has voted with BUSH 90% of the time. Political Mavericks and presidential candidates don’t hide from the media

Posted by: Anthony | September 10, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

The comments were said with reference to McCain switching his stance from experience to change…no need to blow all this out of proportion as McCain has.
After all, McCain Campaign are the masters of Mass Distraction – he’s gotten everyone off message so they don’t have to actually TELL you how they’re going to make things better for us poor and middle-class Americans. Distract us because he has NO plan…just replace Bush and continue on the same path…

Posted by: Nan D | September 10, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Boy all Better pay attention and Grow up Obama if you listen to the whole speach was talking about McCain that for 30 years he has done nothing and now he plans to change ,putting Lipstick on a Pig ~ it is used all the time ! McCain used it on Hillary when she tried to get the health program through !
What is wrong with American people , We have issues and now we are back to swift boat tactics !

Posted by: Ruth | September 10, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I guess that now since we have a woman in the political picture, this phrase can’t be used any more, however it does appear that when you look at the total events of that day when Obama first spoke the phrase, and the audience response later, they knew that the fish was McCain and the pig was Palin.
If Palin had not mentioned the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull is lipstick, the controversy would not be there.
I would suggest that the old term of lipstick on a pig is now dead as a political term.

Posted by: Nicholas | September 10, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

WILL EVERYONE JUST PLEASE LEAVE SARAH ALONE??? After all, she’s only a woman. Everyone knows that women are emotionally fragile. It just question after question after question. Why should she have to answer all these questions??? All you mean liberals and media types (same thing except for FOX) are just so hateful. I can’t wait for Sarah to become President and finally be treated like the lady she is by Putin and Ahmadinewhatever.

Posted by: Georgia-Dan | September 10, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

McCain made a horrible decision to pick the phony Sarah Palin and take on the Rove people to do his campaign. What he will accomplish if he wins will be to degrade our democracy. What he’ll accomplish if he wins then dies, is he’ll elevate a person to the Presidency that will do more damage to our nation than anyone since James Buchanan or George W. Bush.

Posted by: Edward | September 10, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

If Mr. McSame is so concerned about sexism why is it that he doesn’t support equal pay for equal work. HYPOCRITE.

Posted by: cindyp | September 10, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Barack, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Enough, Enough, Let Sarah Palin feeks free for herself, Bill , I know you are jealous because your wife is not vp president, too bad . You should not speech for Barck because he did not choose Hillary for vice president. Obama asked Bill and Hillary to help him on speech . What hell! Bill and Hillary both are suckering , Obama just use you both as dogs. Tell Obama to his job , not your job. I think we are proud of Sarh Palin as VP president.
I am tired of Barck Obama is a whiner man all time. I know Barack is trying to steal Sarah `s women supports. Please leave Sarah alone!! I dont want to vote Barck Obama , and he is yuck!!
Let vote McCain and Sarah Palin for presidents!!!!!!

Posted by: Buck | September 10, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Obama has inadvertently honored McCain (and possibly Palin) by calling him or them pig(s). Pigs are clean and smart if you get to know them. And they are really nice to humans if you treat them well. Calling them pigs is an insult not to these GOP hypocrites but to pigs because these GOP hypocrites are scumbags, not pigs.

Posted by: Gorestro | September 10, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

It’s a shame
A man who once deserved and held great respect has turned the Straigh Talk Express into Crooked Liars Slowboat to Oblivion.
McSame is on the bridge to nowhere because lying and deception are his only ploy. His only “Change” involves changing the debate from what is important and critical for our country into a mudslinging festival where he will say anything without any regard for the truth.
Palin as President?
It’s a terrible idea. We don’t need George W. Bush with or without lipstick.
The IQ of anyone who thinks Obama’s repeat of John McCain’s often said “lipstick on a pig” was calling Palin a Pig is down in Forrest Gump’s range.
The PIG is McCain’s claim of “change” and there is none.

Posted by: Revolver44 | September 10, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Jake Tapper can live by his one rule if he wants… an obvious Obama supporter, as are most of the posters here.
Just realize that this is a political move that distracts from Obama’s real message (which itself is lame) – so “job well done” by McCain’s campaign and very poor foresight on Obama’s side…
And yes, Obama’s campaign would do the same and I’m sure will pull off similar tactics… maybe Jake Tapper can come up with another fantastic rule and replace this one that apparently solves the world’s problems.

Posted by: Jack | September 10, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Four years ago we had Swift Boat Liars for Bush. Now we have Jane Swift Lies for McCain.

Posted by: Glen | September 10, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

FlashOverride wrote:
“Why when someone says pig, do the Republicans immediately associate that with Palin?”
hehehehe
I was wondering the same thing.

Posted by: BMS | September 10, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

it wa sok for palin to say taht a comunity organizer was basiclly worthless, and how about rudy julie saying if you dont support mccain you are anti-american. all mccain and the republicans do is attack obama and cut him down but if the democrats or obama say one thing they are wrong… but that is what you get from the republican party. they want to finish trashing the constitution taht bush has started.

Posted by: tom | September 10, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

republicans can attack democrats but how dare democrats attack republicans.. i meen realy how dare the democrats attack the holier than thou republicans.

Posted by: tom | September 10, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Puh-lease. Can we just get over this childishness? I have a couple more sayings that probably are sexist now–we can no longer say about Washington politics–”If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas”-because Sarah is a pitbull and that’s sexist! Oh,and I guess “Politics makes strange bedfellows ” is really out of the question.
I’ve got one for you faux feministas: “If the shoe fits, wear it.”

Posted by: mags | September 10, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Puh-lease. Can we just get over this childishness? I have a couple more sayings that probably are sexist now–we can no longer say about Washington politics–”If you lie down with dogs you get up with fleas”-because Sarah is a pitbull and that’s sexist! Oh,and I guess “Politics makes strange bedfellows ” is really out of the question.
I’ve got one for you faux feministas: “If the shoe fits, wear it.”

Posted by: mags | September 10, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

to ALL GEROGE BUSH LOVEER are u still looking for BIN LADEN.and got high gas price. and MCCAIN is a joke.he want the something bush want make gas price go though the roof.and four more year of market down & real estate is complete failure and business let the USA.I Iraq
WHO IS LOOKING AT GEORGIA????? AND AMERICA’S BUDGET is a big FAILURE.

Posted by: wiley | September 10, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

mjks . rockyroad calling . .
sorry if I got your name wrong.
Matt Damon has it right, according to tables, McCain in likely to die. If that were to happen, we’d have a mental incompetent as president.
We need a pesident that has been vetted. Who is competent to hold office. The President of the United States of America must be a thoroughly vetted woman or man. We, as leaders of the free world must have a person of Jeffersonian competance at our helm. The Presedency is not an office to be taken lightly. Nobel Peace Prize winners don’t necessarily deserve the job. Freedom Fighters like MLK do no necessarily warrant the job.
Heros, Ike Eisenhower barely warranted the job, and yet he had the brilliance to warn us against the military industrial complex.
McAuthor did not merit the job. How the heck can a beauty contestant merit it. Americans are idiots to place their lot, their heritage, their children and their lives into the hands of a woman who has banned books, who is so afraid of free thought that she shoot’s hapless wildlife as a pastime to save her soul.
God, save my soul. God bless America. May she be bludgeoned by an elk.

Posted by: rockyroad | September 10, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

No. Sarah Palin is not a pig with lipstick on. She is a scapegoat for McCain he is just using Palin for his own campaign. Why does he want to run for president? He has all that a man could ask for, a rich beautiful wife, money. He does know what his worth is. How can he be president if he does not know what his finances are. He is an old man that is for power. Does not have an idea how, to be president. All he knows is to step on peoples toes to get what he wants. I would like for someone to interview his ex-wife, she would give an ear full and some. I don’t like him and do not trust him. May God Bless and protect America from this dictator.

Posted by: mary | September 10, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

McLiar’s got a Bridge to Nowhere he wants to sell you.
Now bow to the Queen and empty your pockets on the table.
The historic decline of America, that’s what the world is calling what their watching. Wow, I wonder how many countries will attach us now and how many others will refuse to assist us. Can you say NATO NO MORE?

Posted by: saffy | September 10, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Sorry, correction “attack” us

Posted by: saffy | September 10, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

McCain hired Bush’s smear campaign artists to represent him and this is the stupid coverage we have to put up with.
The republicans will use Sarah Palin as their excuse for no action on health care, education, the war, the economy.
McCain used to be a respectable man once, he should pause to consider how he humiliates himself to snuggle up more closely with the Bush Administration’s policies.
Obama is what we need to lead this country out of it’s current troubles.

Posted by: McGreen | September 10, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Seems like McCain taught his advisor everything there is to know about Lipstick….-she wrote the following book, wonder if she included the reverse strategy he’s using now?
LIPSTICK ON A PIG: Winning In the No-Spin Era by Someone Who Knows the Game
written by Torrie Clarke
Clarke is a former advisor to Senator John McCain.
Non-issue folks– except as an example of trickery and deceit-don’t be fooled.
Can we talk about alternative energy and/or something else that is more significant to the well-being and future of this country?

Posted by: Alice | September 10, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Haha!
Sarah’s homecoming address requires a teleprompter!!!!
LMAO

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

If there is one thing the Republicans know it’s the proper way to prop up cardboard.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Jack
Make one valid point about McCain… None right? I thought so. Oh well.

Posted by: HereToStay | September 10, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

In case you’re reading this….
Sorry McCain. That was a bit mean. Next time I’ll stick to the issues.

Posted by: Kayla | September 10, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Almost more than McCain’s policies, the actions of his campaign over the past month and especially the past week tells us what to expect if he’s elected.
Spin, Spin, Spin and outrage and bluster. They’ll spin every issue and be outraged and blame the “elite liberal press” every time they’re questioned on anything. We would be hearing a lot of “POW” and “That’s sexxist”
All this faux outrage is getting old. They bluster and pretend outrage at every turn. Their game is easy to spot. It is meant to deflect and inti midate,. Deflect people from really looking at this woman and the lies and inaccuracies and spin that are piling up daily and to intimidate people from looking into her background,experience, policies, philosophy, etc

Posted by: Sandy | September 11, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

To those of you who think Obama has nothing maybe you need a quick lession. these are bills Obama has introduced in the senate:
S.3358 Improving Food-borne Illness Surveillance and Response Act of 2008 Introduced Jul 29, 2, S.3077 Strengthening Transparency and Accountability in Federal Spending Act of 2008 Introduce,S.1977 Nuclear Weapons Threat Reduction Act of 2007, S.1885 Military Family Job Protection Act Introduced Jul 26, 2007, ect………. he has two pages as opposed to Mccain’s one this year alone.
and at least he bothered to show up and vote on the GI bill which Mccain didn’t and he’s a vet.
SO STOP SAYING OBAMA HASN’T DONE ANYTHING. You republicans just seem to repeat what you’re told and never question any of it.

Posted by: kari | September 11, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

first, many in the various media sources were reluctant to investigate or question anything before and during the Iraq war…..now… weeks can go by where campaign dogma is repeated without verification.
I wonder why TV & cable news are afraid to say whatever ends up to be actual verifiable truth?
Why does the media allow itself to be put on the defensive by folks who usually have something to hide?
Both political sides play the game, the people, and news sources are the last line of any remnants of democracy left in America

Posted by: Jazzman | September 11, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

The downfall of the Dems is the fact that they sure do alot of finger-pointing about the GOP. The McCain/Palin stance seems to be along the lines of respectful political debates. The lipstick debates are not even feasible issues that need be addressed past, thats not the way it was intended. There is enough inteligence there that one wouldn’t set themself up with nominee suicide. Both parties just need to say what needs to be said and don’t worry about fancy analogies.

Posted by: Dan | September 11, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Dan,you call McCain’s slander “respectful political debates?”
That’s rich!
Maybe you Repubs do the finger pointing over things you yourselves are guilty of and then blame the Democrats for it.

Posted by: bootaysmack17 | September 11, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

McCain is a reckless hothead eaten up with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. What else would you expect from some that unfit to lead?

Posted by: quinnpd | September 11, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Georgia-Dan, you have got to be kidding.
Haha! Putin and Ahmadinejad will treat Palin with respect automatically because she’s a woman? For goodness’s sakes, we do not need such thin-skinned women to be the US’s head of state. There are Muslims in Iran who look as women as inferior, WHY would they respect Palin then?
More importantly, is she going to cry foul at every little remark that appears to be disparaging her? How will this sort of person stare down dictators and rogue governments then?
“IT’S SEXIST!!! WAAAAAH!”
It’s SEXIST if people HAVE to tone down their remarks just because she’s a woman. It’s SEXIST if people cannot use perfectly common phrases in ANY context because she’s a woman, and she’s more “fragile”.
And, to make this clear, I’m a woman.

Posted by: Fed Up | September 11, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am

If Palin was not treated with kid gloves then why is all the media ignoring that Palin Denied that she even requested and got the money for the bridge to nowhere. that money was FEDERAL TAXPAYERS DOLLARS, NOT Sarah’s state budget. IF she really told congress NO THANKS, then why did she keep the money? The media are too kind to Palin.

Posted by: mere | September 11, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

Shows how much old McCain is and how defiecient Palin/McCain education is.
Congressman Charlie Rangel said it right – “You put lipstick on a pig, and you don’t call her a lady.”

Posted by: henry | September 11, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

He can’t let go of her hand and she can’t let go of the script.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 11, 2008, 5:17 am 5:17 am

For all those people claiming that Obama smeared Palin, have you seen the talk?
If you watch the video, Obama is clearly discussing McCain’s claims to stand for “change”. That is the context. He was discussing policies and campaign spin, NOT individuals.
That the Republican Party is spinning his comments in this way shows how low they will sink. That is unsurprising. That some people seem to be buying it, now that is sad.

Posted by: Anarcho | September 11, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

What’s this? The GOP, a bunch of whiners? OMG – the sky is falling!

Posted by: Jane | September 11, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Obama’s remark “Lipstick on a Pig”, gaff or calculated?
Only if you believe Barrack Obama is a gifted orator who knows how to play to an audience, would you be offended by a remark that seemingly jabs Sarah Palin?

Posted by: Vic | September 11, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Republican attack machine – meet the Democrat attack machine. Let’s get down and dirty and RUMBLE!!!!!

Posted by: Bob | September 11, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Vic, NO it doesn’t jab at Palin: You can put lipstick on an apple, and it’s still an apple. You can put lipstick on a chair, and it’s still a chair. You can put lipstick on a pencil, and it’s still a pencil. You can put lipstick on love, and it’s still love. You can put spin on McCain/Bush policy, and it’s still McCain/Bush policy. Get it NOW? It’s a play on WORDS, not a jab at a PERSON.

Posted by: Paula | September 11, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Who are you protecting?

Posted by: NORMAN | September 11, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

It seems as though the McCain campaign somehow feels that it has a patent on lipstick and a copyright on all lipstick comments. But by “fuming” over Obama’s remark that quite clearly was not directed at Palin, they made a strategical error and themselves created the image of Palin as a lipstick-wearing pig. NOT a good move on their part…

Posted by: raflin1 | September 11, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Showing again that the Republicans have absolutely nothing to offer. Rovian politics: attack, attack, attack! The sad thing is the American sheeple fall for it every time. It’s hard to watch my country disintegrate like this.

Posted by: Gus | September 11, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

The lipstick on a pig comment speaks to the truth: McCain’s only Economic policy is to tell you to go get a McJob after your good job is shipped overseas. Republicans are only concerned with padding CEO stock options and lining golden parachutes. If we have to endure any more deregulation-corruption-bailout cycles, our economy is in real trouble! Enough with the Greed Over People party! P.S. If you think the pig comment was alluding to Palin, you are correct–she was an Alaskan Pork Queen before she declared herself a “maverick” reformer.

Posted by: MatthewStLouis314 | September 11, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Large Hadron Collider experiment was almost blocked by a scared, vocal minority of Right Wing Cooks Religious Cooks convinced that turning on the LHC would spell doom for the earth. Yet some simple research and background in fairly basic science should have been enough to allay the fears generated by the LHC project. Again, Stephen Hawking:
Perhaps the Right wingers attack on science is having an affect in that our students lag the all other first world science in science education.
And now we have a VP candidate who actually supports the nonsense of Creationism. If you believe in creationism then you would have to reject all of Physics, Biology, Geology, Archeology, Mathematics and on and on.
Palin is a member of the
“Flat Earth Society”
Obama Biden ‘08

Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

I think it’s funny that Mccain’s former press secretary has a book aptly titled “Lipstick on a Pig” (search it on Amazon). Get over it. Republicans are hypocrites. Plain and simple. American people – you are getting conned and distracted by the right wing. Take a deep breath, think about your family and the issues at hand and block out the Republican noise. We have suffered 8 long years to keep this going.

Posted by: RJ | September 11, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

This is complete nonsense. What does it say about a candidate of a certain age when he becomes cranky and hyper-sensitive over remarks he totally misinterprets or perhaps mis-heard? What oes it say about both politcal parties when they attempt to impose politically correct hyper-sensitive speech codes on debate? This is everything that’s wrong with politocal porthodoxy and has me wondering whether McCain is just self-righteous or is slipping into senility.

Posted by: dem-dog | September 11, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Are you McCain-Palin supports totally insane?
Would you like fewer women’s rights when McCain-Palin stack the supreme court with more extreme conservative judges which has long term effects for decades to come?
Obama is not perfect by any means, but for your own good, vote for the lesser of 2 evils.

Posted by: CE | September 11, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I Just can not understand how McCain could pick a woman with so Little Knowlege of American Democracy! I feel Obama has been a Senator and Harvard Graduate ~ to know many important people to Help him Run this country ! We have to be on Guard as to who McCain would help him will they be quilfied !God forbid if he is elected and does not live out his term Sara would become President what a disaster.
I respect her as a Mother and a woman / But not as My President as there were far more woman republican woman who would have been more quilfied .Split second decision .!!!

Posted by: ruth | September 11, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

lipstick is the least of McCain & Palin’s worries.
The fact is that neither of them knows what even a modicum of truth is anymore.
When Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska took center stage at the Republican convention last week, she sought to burnish her executive credentials by telling how she had engineered the deal that jump-started a long-delayed gas pipeline project.
The reality, however, is far more ambiguous than the impression Ms. Palin has left at the convention and on the campaign trail.
Certainly she proved effective in attracting developers to a project that has eluded Alaska governors for three decades. But an examination of the pipeline project also found that Ms. Palin has overstated both the progress that has been made and the certainty of success.
The pipeline exists only on paper. The first section has yet to be laid, federal approvals are years away and the pipeline will not be completed for at least a decade. In fact, although it is the centerpiece of Ms. Palin’s relatively brief record as governor, the pipeline might never be built, and under a worst-case scenario, the state could lose up to $500 million it committed to defray regulatory and other costs.

Posted by: Jazzman | September 11, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

McCain footage, JUST FOUND. Read it here: Film shows McCain’s release from Vietnamese

Posted by: ablanche08 | September 11, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

I cant believe that we are going this far on a comment that is as old as John McCain is. I mean of Sarah Palin can throw out comments to people and then can’t take it then we already know she is not ready. Should she become VP it will be worse, so she needs to grow some thick skin. What is even more disgusiting than that is for all of this attention to be placed on this mess instead of on the issues. They act like people are not concerned about gas prices, and high food prices. I mean you are telling us her being criticized is more important than what is affecting all of us, and we are buying into this. Hillary Clinton said it so well when she told the crowd at a debate that her and all the other candidates are going to be ok, but we the hard working middle class families are the ones that should be concerned. Instead we follow after this mess like it makes a big difference in the whole scheme of things. Worse than that, white women say they wanted Hillary Clinton, and John McCain finds a woman that no one knows and we fall over her, and she does not hold the values or the same stand on the issues that Hillary did, and we run right behind her before she has proven anything, before we even knows what she is all about. I mean why did we support Hillary because she was a woman only. I mean I have to wonder what we are thinking. We need to think about what we are doing.

Posted by: Linda | September 11, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Don’t forget that you supported and defended her against all logic. it is you who would sacrifice the republic to your vanity.
Shamelessly you leer at her form. She is going to ruin the country because she doesn’t have time for facts, or issues, or even general information.
She doesn’t know anything but you want her. If she is ever president then it is your fault. If you like her you must have … BUSH.

Posted by: Petra | September 12, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

His comments were no innocent common expressions. They show utter contempt for Pallin.
He is a consumate speaker. Growing up in Indonesia and Hawaii, using words with double meaning is a way of getting back at your oppressors.
Consider his calling the small town WHY SILLY in stead of Wasellia. Or Calling her a MooSHooTER pidkin instead of Moose hunter: and the latest lipstick on a pig. Another word for pig is HOG,Notice also the smirk on his face as he says these words as he played a private prank that nobody else knows. Islanders know.

Posted by: Yavad123 | September 14, 2008, 5:40 am 5:40 am

Our name should be a national joke!

Posted by: The Palin Truth Squad | September 21, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Thanks Jake for the factual information & the objectivity! Obviously, context is everything & no one called anyone a pig, though McCain seems to have come closest in the Romney remark. Still, I doubt VERY much that he was seriously trying to say Romney was a pig.
Anyone, who thinks or cries that Obama was talking about Palin when he uttered the pig expression is either incapable of following conversation, biased as hell or both!
May truth always prevail.
Sincerely,
Susie S.

Posted by: flyhead | September 25, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.