Barack and Bill Lunch
At President Bill Clinton’s office in Harlem today, at the William J. Clinton Foundation at 55 W. 125th Street in New York City, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and the former president broke bread for the first time since the contentious Democratic primaries.
A variety of options from Cosi were available, including sandwiches, salad and flatbread pizza.
The two briefly entertained some questions from reporters.
When will Bill Clinton hit the campaign trail?
"I’m going out this month," Clinton said, "as soon as my Global Initiative is over, I’m going out."
"We’re putting him to work," Obama said.
Will the former president be out frequently?
"I’ve agreed to do a substantial number of things," Clinton said. "Whatever I’m asked to do."
What do you think of the state of the race — is it too close for comfort?
"I predict that Sen. Obama will win and will win pretty handily," Clinton said.
"There you go," Obama said. "You can take it from the president of the United States. He knows a little something about politics."
"That’s what I think is going to happen," Clinton said.
– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
UPDATE: For what it’s worth, here’s a joint statement from the two Democrats’ spokesmen: “Pres. Clinton and Sen. Obama had a great conversation in Harlem today. They discussed the campaign briefly, but mostly talked about how the world has changed since September 11, 2001. Sen. Obama praised the work of the Clinton Foundation around the world and Pres. Clinton applauded Sen. Obama’s historic campaign, which has inspired millions around the country. They also spoke about what the next president can do to help make the economy work for all Americans, as it did under Pres. Clinton, and ensure safety and prosperity far beyond the coming the election. Pres. Clinton said he looks forward to campaigning for Sen. Obama later this month.”
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Cosi is a rip-off. Nice body language. Clinton is leaning away from Obama.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Wow Obama is a cheap lunch date!!!
Bill wants him to lose. I know it.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Totally, geevil. Clinton was probably dreading it.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Look at that, questions taken from reporters.
That’s what a candidate who is unafraid of the press does.
McCain came out of hiding place today as well, getting ripped by a reporter from Maine. I am guessing that he is going back into hiding.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
I feel sorry for Bill now… He really misses the limelight and he interjected himself into the news with this phony lunch date.
Oh! and Obama looked like his son..with that stupid comment, “there you go”….. so if Bush says McCain will win, that means he knows something about politics too..
Posted by: Frieda | September 11, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Lets see a liar supporting another liar, what a surprise!
Ryan C. – What reporters was McCain hiding from?? I do not consider people asking question from the liberal entertainment org. such as the New York time, MCNBC, CBS and so on!!
And why we are on it, what tough questions has Obama ever answered from anyone?
Also what was promised to Clinton to help Obama?
Is Biden going to drop out?? Is Obama going to Drop Biden, because of Obama’s indecisiveness’s?
Posted by: spock | September 11, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Leaning away? Not if you watch the video. Wants him to lose? Not hardly. The Clintons are realists, and know there is too much at stake to risk 4 more years, starting with the Supreme Court, health care, and war. Of course they wish she were the nominee — it’s only natural. But at the end of the day, they want what’s right for the country. And they are both very clear about fighting for Obama to win.
Posted by: TKD | September 11, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Bill knows a little thing about lying to our face too.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
How is that campaign going Obamabots? Looks like the whole bridge to nowhere is going nowhere.
The Obama campaign is poorly run. The Wall Street Journal posted a damaging article today, the lipstick business was like Mike Dukakis in that Tank Ad, they are unraveling!!!!
Mid September, No way Obama is coming back from this. Just want until he see’s what independents like me do. I could not vote in my primary because I was independent. Voters like me will be his worst nightmare.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Bill Clinton did say that Obama had to beg for him to help him. I guess the begging has started and it does make Obama seem weak. Very weak.
The thoughts going on in Bill’s head. I can only imagine.
Posted by: coolrepublica | September 11, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Thats it Obama bow down before Bill. I am sure Hill and Bill will do everything possible to help you out with this election thing. No really! didn’t you see the excitment on Bill’s face and he was smiling we all know what that means. Gosh I miss the real Prez.
Posted by: Jim | September 11, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Bill loves Hillary and will do anything he can so she won’t be blamed for Obama’s impending loss. You’re better than this, Bill – but we understand.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: ROBERT | September 11, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
IGNORE THE GREEN SARAH POLLEN!
Take a hint: Sarah Pollen is all the way in Alaska.
Leave her there with her troopergate!
John McCaint = Bush = 8 years of national and international FAILURE and bad luck for Americans!
Sarah Pollen ‘SHARES THE VIEWS’ of McCaint!
That should be the target.
Obama has the Intelligence, Vision & Vigor to successfully handle the numerous challenges facing America.
McCaint lacks the vigor and vision and intelligence to handle the issues.
That is why McCaint want the election to be non-issue based
Posted by: Patriot | September 11, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Obama looks like an errand buy standing next to Clinton. and yes plastic phony smiles on both of them.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Our media is definitely being manipulated. Some because they want so badly for Obama to win – but others because they’re afraid of his team of lawyers and a lawsuit. Remember how Obama won in Chicago? Remember how he blocked a re-vote in MI and FL? Remember how he used the Department of Justice threat to stop the Ayers ads? The Harvard lawyer knows how to use intimidation and the legal system.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Bill predicted Hillary Clinton would win the primary when she’s losing in the polls, but she FAILED!!! Now he is doing to same thing, and the same result will come.
Posted by: Bill's Predict | September 11, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
I can just see Obama on his knees begging Clinton to run out for a hail Mary pass. If Clinton has an ounce of decency left, he’d say ‘Punt, you fool!’
Obama famous race-baiting trick certainly tainted Clinton’s legacy. Bill has a good memory.
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
*=*=*=*=* Obama for President *=*=*=*=*
* Cut taxes for 95% of Americans
* Invest in alternative energy
* Repair foreign relations
* Encourage Iraqis to take responsibility, plan safe exit from Iraq.
* Pass equal pay for equal work law
Posted by: VoteObama | September 11, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
This is great.
Bill is a great speaker and campaigner and no matter what your opinion about the man, he will have a positive impact on the campaign. There is no question that Bill Clinton is respected in the battle states.
It will be interesting to see where all of the photo opts and video interviews will go. This will get a lot of press, too, both locally (of course!!) and nationally. This will increase and clarify the message and get the issues and policies of the Obama/Biden ticket said over and over. More above the muddy non-issue landscape.
Posted by: lucy2008 | September 11, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Again, 2008 election is all about Clintions. Without Clintons, Dems will definitely lose again…
BTW, where is Carter? where is Gore, Kerry…..Did they just keep quite because they couldn’t do anything helping their dear Obama?
Posted by: S.O.S | September 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Yes mary lou but they are losing, big time. That real clear electoral map looked totally different last month.
Obama 216, McCain 217. Obama is in serious trouble. No way MO is going Obama, and I predict Ohio won’t either. Obama is even losing in Indiana. Which is the neighboring state to Illinois. What a loser.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
lucy2008
We already know Obama’s plans. Big government only more so. That’s all!
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Seem like Obama is helpless. He can’t give a speech without a teleprompter and he can’t run a campaign without the Clinton’s. What did he have to promise Hillary to get her to throw her support his way at the DNC. And how much more of his office did he have to give to Bill to get him to try to save him? I originally thought he was a smart, capable candidate. Now I beleive he’s just a talking head that can only do what others set up for him. He won’t get my vote. And to the dem’s that are saying they will leave the country if he loses, please do. Jay Marvin has said it on his show. He wants to go live in France. I hope he does and I hope he takes all the other cry babies with him.
Posted by: Marine76 | September 11, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Everyone knows Bill Clintondislikes Obama. That photo OP will do nothing for Obama.
Keep Dreaming you guys are falling in the electoral count.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I see two presidents standing together. Where’s the old guy who hides behind women’s skirts?
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Does anyone else find it ironic, after subjecting Hillary Clinton to sexist attacks for months–then banishing her and Bill to “an undisclosed location”–that Obama is getting as *** kicked by a “girl”?
PS to Barack: Jay-Z lyrics do not provide the values to which the country you aspire to lead subscribes.
Posted by: Just a minute Sweetie | September 11, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
2 presidents have lunch.
and y’all know it.
lol
Mccain wobbles across a room and shouts some angry words and “Palin”
then answers no questions and gives no answers…
like I said 2 Presidents have lunch.
2 Presidents that bookend the last 8 horrible years.
Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 11, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
obama is a conceited idiot. Had he just let Hillary get the nomination and possibly been VP, he could maybe have been the president in 8 years.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
When you look at the Democratic ticket and bench you just know how weak the Republican’s are. I mean the old timer can’t get out from Palin’s skirt. She has proven to be a parrot. What a joke. The Republicans will win when they stop peddelling dog food.
Posted by: Daniel Plainview | September 11, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
I am sure they actually talked about what Bill is going to do in the new administration…as well.
anyone who thinks he won’t be getting a better deal out of an Obama administration is just playing in lala land.
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
It’s written all over Bill’s face. He want Obama to lose — and so do I.
Posted by: jesusa | September 11, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
I look forward to hearing Bill Clinton, a real statesman, speak about the issues facing our country.
I’m tired of hearing about the McCain camp claiming sexism but telling us over and over about Palin’s kids and her pregancy decisions. They treat us like morons and talk about stupid stuff instead of the issues.
This old lady is joining the Obama campaign because the current culture in Washington has to change – McCain/Palin hasn’t shown anybody they are any different.
Posted by: Disgusted in Florida | September 11, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
“I’m going out this month,” Clinton said, “as soon as my Global Initiative is over I’m going out.”
HA! CLINTON IS BLOWING OBAMA OFF!!!!!
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
The lipstickgate ploy was enough to get the press to temporarily forget that Palin’s entire stump speech is a lie. What will the McCain campaign distract with next?
They’re already being called out for the despicable, lying sex education ad. I think McCain has jumped the shark.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
The meeting between a former Democratic President and the current Democratic candidate for President speaks worlds about the absence of a meeting between the current Republican President and the currrent Republican candidate.
Posted by: Luther | September 11, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
I love it. More, More, More Please…They never thought Bill would say it, not in a million years. Ha Ha
Posted by: Dem-4-Life | September 11, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
spock: “Lets see a liar supporting another liar, what a surprise!”
BWAHHHHAAHAAA!!! That’s hysterical coming from a Grandpappy McSame supporter! Both the Geezer and Gidget are the true champions of lies, deceit and misinformation!
Posted by: Victoria | September 11, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
There’s a huge problem with Obama sending ANY Clinton out on the campaign trail. It reminds everyone that Hillary should be on the Dem ticket – and she should be at the top.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
I think Bill should give up his job as a fortune teller. I love you Bill but Mccain 216, Obama 217 says Obama loses
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Let’s get to the truth about the obama lies!!! This nut posted this on here earlier. Great catch phrases, but let’s see what it really means..shall we
*=*=*=*=* Obama for President *=*=*=*=*
* Cut taxes for 95% of Americans – this is the biggest lie of the obama camp. They will raise taxes on everyone…100%. What obama calls a ‘tax cut’ is really another stimulus check. HE WILL NOT LOWER THE TAX RATES ON 95% OF AMERICANS!!!
* Invest in alternative energy – He will raise taxes to spend on ‘many’ alternative forms of energy…no clear message…just the buzz word ‘alternative energy’
* Repair foreign relations – how? by giving longwinded speeches
* Encourage Iraqis to take responsibility, plan safe exit from Iraq. – What happened to the ‘immediate withdrawal’ claim that won him the demoncratic nomination?
* Pass equal pay for equal work law – this is scary! Does this mean special pay for minorities?
I think I would rather vote for someone with experience!
Posted by: amac | September 11, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
stephen gianelli
seems sexism matters most when you are for not giving women the rights they deserve…
That would be the McCain Palin tichet…
you know the one with the guy who has made more than one sexist joke and who laughed (on camera of all places) as Hillary Clinton was called a *#$%^…
yeah all that bologne is going to blow up uin your face
one ticket is fighting for equal pay for equal work (which I personally as a guy can’t believe that is not the law already ugh)
and women to have the right to do with their bodies and have the right to be educated as to birth control…
one ticket fights for the healthcare issues that are killing women and mom’s under it’s out of control lack of humanity toward women’s issues in healthcare
there is one sexist platform in this race…and it doesn’t use a trojan horse VP to try and manipulate that truth.
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
obama meets with President Clinton at Clinton’s office…..speaks volumes about who needs whom more….
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
“Ryan C. – What reporters was McCain hiding from??”
Any. He hasn;t taken question from his pool reporters or held a pressers in weeks.
He has given two interviews in the last 2 weeks and blew off Larry King because Camobell Brown asked Tucker for an example of Palin being CiC and Tucker coulnd’t do it.
“I do not consider people asking question from the liberal entertainment org. such as the New York time, MCNBC, CBS and so on!!”
So McCain can face down Putin and capture Bin Laden but he’s afraid of the liberal media?
“And why we are on it, what tough questions has Obama ever answered from anyone?”
He was just on O’Reilly. Conversely McCain would never appear on Keith Olbermann’s show.
Why? Because he is a coward.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Obama – let Michelle out to roam with the reporters! Inquiring minds have a few questions for her!
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Notice how people on the right argue.
They need to lie to make a point.
(Lipstick gate)
They need to predict the future to claim Obama is lying.
(Obama will raise your taxes!)
They have a deep seated need to insult the opposition rather than point out any errors in the policy.
They need to pretend that the current mess that we’re in hasn’t been presided over by Republican control.
Then they yell and try to cut off the mike.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
I’m glad that Obama has another changed opinion of Bill Clinton. Back to the president instead of the racist.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 11, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
While Palin is tied to McCain’s hip to build crowds and avoid the press, Obama has an four prong attack of himself, Biden, Hillary and Bill to unleash on the battleground states. They can hit Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Florida at the same time while McCain-Palin can only hit one. Then, they can all come back together for mega-rallies. All this will dominate the news cycle for October.
Posted by: Shelton | September 11, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Seeing these two together makes me think of the prosperous 90′s when Bill was president, and also how promising the next 8 years will be with a President Obama. mccain has been avoiding a picture like this with bush or cheney so as not to remind everyone of what a bush-3 term would be like. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | September 11, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
“but Mccain 216, Obama 217 says Obama loses”
I hope Obama is elected and gets to work fixing our schools.
Look at how poor in math right wingers are.
Last I checked 217 is higher than 216.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
McCain/Palin 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am Hillary’s supporter and I am so happy to vote for the best ticket:
MCCAIN/PALIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Maca | September 11, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
mkoch
And the lefties are different?
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
this only reminds people of the undeniable truth that Senator Clinton is the only candidate capable of being the best President that our children, our troops and America deserves and needs right now at this critical time in our history
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Oh look, we can’t point out the obvious hostility between Clinotn and Obama.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Ryan C
Fixing our schools? You mean everybody’s schools except the elite private school he sends his kids to? Yes, exactly what do you mean?
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
for those who truly want the best President for their children, our troops and America: Write In Senator Clinton on November 4th!
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Saw the body language between Bill and Bozo and you could cut it with a knife. Bill did not look like he wanted to be there and Bozo was all smiles for a photo op. I just wish Bill and Hill could say what they really think and feel to all of us, and not just behind closed doors. Oh, I remember…Hillary said Obama only has a speech he gave in 2004, while she and McCain had a lifetime of experience, Bill said it was a fairytale…being accused of racism by this nasty BO campaign….we agree with you both…and Biden too…BO not qualified to be POTUS…Hillary would have made a great Prez. candidate, better VP pick…Biden love McCain too. If any of you don’t really believe that Biden has more in common with McCain and a deeper friendship with him, you’re crazy. He’s known Bozo for 2 minutes compared to his long friendship with McCain….and we have it on tape he would have been proud to run with him…because McCain was courted by Dems to join their ranks years ago. HE IS A CENTRIST…YA, KNOW THE KIND OF CANDIDATE THAT AMERICANS HISTORICALLY VOTE FOR. NEVER A LIB, THE #3 BIGGEST LIB IN SENATE.
Posted by: Debra | September 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
on a lighter note, they both look dapper :)
handsome men.
Posted by: voter in pa | September 11, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
get a life Ryan C. I know that it you must hate it but with Obama losing momentum and McCain gaining. It doesn’t look good for you. It works like this Obama has losing states.
Sorry the truth hurts.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Bill, I love you man. But, I disagree.
McCain-Palin08 … “Made in of the Right Stuff”.
Posted by: Randy | September 11, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
amac
if you want lies on taxes
go look at mccain and Palin’s lips….”read them”
they are giving the high one on taxes…just when they go back on that promise…this way they get to distribute that tax burden the same way the RNC has now done for 40 years…keeping the growth of tax burden over that time on the top 5% of wage earners at half the growth rate of everyone else.
George Bush sr and jr…talked about earmarks (and they didn’t pick a candidate whase state receives more earmark per capita than any state in the union…yeah 515 per capite …as an example Illinois receives 20 per capita…)
so you can stop the lying…it has gone on for years… and the same thing over and over
Bush 1 said no new taxes and cutting spending…then flipped on everyone
Bush 2 lowered the taxes but in turn we sh!t the bed… and drove up all kinds of financial problems that go a lot deeper than if we didn’t cut them …you know like Mccain use to argue before he needed the old boys who have screwed us for so long to support his bid.
yeah that is where the lie on taxes is…because every economist worth his salt said that no matter what taxes have to get raised somewhere…or else our country is going to go in the ****** for our kids.
and yes it is about spending…but mccain will not be able to cut spending with either a dem or republican congress…too many state officials looking out for their states and their own interests…like Alaska to start with.
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Obama paying his “dues” to Don Clintonio…..getting his marching
orders while pretending to give them.
You can bet that Obama has pledged
money from petty cash to help Hillary
in her hour of financial need. You
can also bet that Obama will be washing
his hands with Lysol after the his-
toric handshake. No, the Clintons will
never go away. Yes, they will continue
to rule their party.
Posted by: grizzly bare | September 11, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
.
Sorry, but the less Bill Clinton has to say, the better off Obama will be.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Look at the good news Debra!! McCain is gaining!!!
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
dl -
Some lefties are different.
Try me.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
chris..I love Hillary too, but no write ins or sit outs….B. Hussein inches closer to WH. Hillary would understand our voting AGAINST Obama. I think she, Bill and Chelsea will too.
Posted by: Debra | September 11, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Obama is loosing so he is groveling at the feet of Hillary and President Clinton because he knows he hasn’t got a chance in hell without them.
What a sad, pathetic loser.
It’s too bad the Dem leadership decided they were going to screw Hillary and (s)elect the weakest candidate, Obama.
Posted by: OxyCon | September 11, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Ole Bill also thought his wife would win the nomination and he also thought that the blacks would support Hillary. Wrong on both counts, Bill. Quit your guessing.
Posted by: loyalamerican | September 11, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
QUOTE OF HILLARY ROHDAM CLINTON;
NO MCCAIN NO WAY NO HOW!
Posted by: angie | September 11, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
McCain has gained about all he’s gonna. The post-convention pendulum will be swinging back soon.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Was Obama’s Freudian slip about his Muslim faith the Wright thing to say?
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
The Clintons should flip him off their shoulders (like he did Hilliary). Obama is a fake.
Posted by: Diane | September 11, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
This just in, Obama was talking with Bill about the chances of Chelsea getting on as an Intern. Or is that only ok if it’s someone elses daughter?
Posted by: Monica | September 11, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
I love the pseudo Hillary “supporters” amongst the right. No Hillary supporter would vote for McCain. No Democrat would, either. They’ve seen the result of Republicans in power. These are all Republicans just trying to rile the Democrats, because they can’t win on policy.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Hope after BO left Bill’s office they got out the Lysol…..I’m sure he left a stink in the air.
We love Hill (and Bill as her pillowtalk partner would have been a 2 for the price of 1)….but they don’t owe B. Hussein jack ****
Posted by: Debra | September 11, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Lies. Innuendos. Insults. Strawman attacks. Doesn’t the right have ANYTHING to run on?
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
mkoch…I am a Hillary supporter/contributor and I am voting McCain (donated to him the day Hillary dropped out). Love that he picked Palin too….but what can’t you guys undersand about 50% of Americans vote on emotion and I can’t stand Obama for Prez. Not everyone is a party loyalist.
COUNTRY FIRST!
Posted by: Debra | September 11, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
“Fixing our schools?”
Yes. Obama plans to scrap No Child Left Behind, invest in charter schools and work on a merit pay system for teachers.
McCain wants to hand out vouchers for private schools.
Obama understands that education is key to us keeping market competitiveness.
McCain self admittedly doesn’t know much about the economy and he knows diddly squat about the educational system of this country.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
I voted for Hillary but now I am for McCain. I heard that he will lose Oho and Virgina, maybe even MI that was leaning McCain but is now changing. It just proves that there are still logical people in this country who sees that Obama is a moron. Let him go back to Chicago to his racist church and hang out with Rezko and Ayers.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
“I hope Obama is elected and gets to work fixing our schools. ”
Him and his terrorist buddy failed in that regard with the Annenburg Challenge. I have no doubt that Barry will have no problem spending our money.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
dl…the media didn’t cover Obama’s little slip on his Muslim faith on Sunday with George S. Not surprising.
Posted by: Debra | September 11, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“What a nice thing 0bama said about Clinton today.”
Just a photo op. He’s attempting to recover disenfranchised Hillary supporters that have left the party.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Check out the Real Clear site which has NEW ELECTORAL MAP UP!!!!
GO MCCAIN
CONCERNED IN OH, HOW IS OHIO LOOKING TO YOU???
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
mkoch…I’m a centrist….so is Hillary and that’s why Bill Clinton won. Victacrats don’t get it….they don’t win elections with liberals. They won’t this time either.
Americans historically vote RIGHT OF CENTER…..2008 WILL BE NO DIFFERENT.
Posted by: Debra | September 11, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Keith,
Basic math 217 is more than 216.
Oh and when you take away tossup states(RCP has kindly posted that map as well) and reward them based on polling, Obama gets 273, McCain gets 265.
273 is more than 265.
273 is also the greater than the 270 votes required to win the Presidency.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Lies. Innuendos. Insults. Strawman attacks. Doesn’t the right have ANYTHING to run on?
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Who cares about the Clintons anyway? Bill was a cheater and Hillary is a fraud. Neither one will ever step foot in the Whitehouse!
Palin ’08, ’12, ’16!
Country First!!!
Posted by: Sue-Anne | September 11, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Having followed this contest, I sadly observed that in the past few days when Barack Obama sagged in the polls, the liberal media jumped in to his rescue with a barrage of vicious personal attacks on Gov. Sarah Palin. Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” is a low blow and the liberal media digging dirt is OTT!
Here is one article I find compelling and credible because it comes from no less Obama’s own hometown by Chicago Tribune John Kass. It highlights the difference between Sarah Palin and Obama:
“The young Alaska Republican put her political career on the line by challenging the corrupt, old Alaskan Republican bulls on their sleazy pay-for-play politics and their use of the public trust to fill the pockets of their friends. She didn’t merely talk about abstract change in Washington. She challenged corruption at home, challenged her own party bosses—some of whom are already in prison—at great risk to her political future.
‘It is something I’ve begged and begged Obama to do with the ham-fisted pols in Chicago and Illinois—to not merely talk about change far away, but to take a principled stand even if that stand runs counter to his political interests at home; to challenge the thugs of his own party, to give us a reason to believe he’s the man he says he is. He has politely declined. In this, Obama obviously has more experience than Palin.”
Posted by: Arjay | September 11, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
The Clinton years were great economically because of the dot.com bubble – which burst when Bush came into office. A monkey could have had a successful administration in the 90s.
The current economy is the worst possible time to put Obama’s tax policy into action. Even he knows it – now he says he won’t repeal the Bush tax cuts.
But those handouts? He’s going to grow the debt by going full steam ahead with those. Totally irresponsible and clueless.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
i WOULD LOVE to see McCain putting G-DUB out on the campaign trail.
Posted by: Omentum | September 11, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Debra -
Historically Right of center?
That’s another lie.
Care to give me a source on that?
Country wide, on policy, the majority of Americans support Democratic policies.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Too bad O bum a is now thinking about the Clintons’. Hope they tell him so bad so sad, go away……..Me, I’m a Dem who is voting for McCain/Palin.
Posted by: a. keune | September 11, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
The real reason why Obama did not select Hillary… EXTREME MUSLIM MEN DO NOT HAVE FAVORABLE OPINIONS ON WOMEN
McCain/Palin – the logical choice
Posted by: Catherine | September 11, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Maybe. Just maybe. If Hillary gets down on her hands and knees and begs Sarah, she will let her be VP in 2012. Maybe.
Palin ’08, ’12, ’16!
Country First!!!
Posted by: Sue-Anne | September 11, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Politics is a nice game. In order to win it you must be capable of how to play it.
Now the two smart brains are together, am anxiously waiting to see what we will be discussing about in one week to come.
Posted by: Peace | September 11, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
marylou
as our business infrastructure crash and burn around us
as our foreign relations smolder
as our citizen pound forclosure signs in their lawns
as family members mourn a fallen comrade
ANY MORE EXCUSES FOR BUSH/MCCAIN
Posted by: Omentum | September 11, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Hillary supporters know who she, Bill, and Chelsea will really be voting for on Nov4th.
Obama would not crawl back to Bill if things were going well in Obamaland.
Obama played his favorite weapon–the race card–with Bill. I bet Bill loathes him.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 11, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Country first.
Obama/Biden.
Don’t fall for the “Experience1…no, wait, I mean change! Yeah, change! Well, I mean, more of the same, but we’re gonna call it change! And stop calling my running mate a pig, even if I’m the only one who did!”
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Please. The Hillary supporters I know could barely stand her. They only wanted to vote for a woman. Now that we have Palin, none of them have a nice word to say about Hillary. She’s such a fraud.
Palin ’08, ’12, ’16!
Country First!!!
Posted by: Sue-Anne | September 11, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
The McCain comment stems from an Oct. 31, 2005, appearance on the Charlie Rose talk show on PBS. He was asked about winning in Iraq. After discussing issues confronting that country, McCain concluded: “Afghanistan, we don’t read about anymore, because it’s succeeded. And by the way, there’s several reasons, including NATO participation and other reasons, why Afghanistan is doing as well as it is.”
A top commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan said Friday that he needed thousands of additional troops to combat violence along the border with Pakistan, a requirement that appears to be at odds with recommendations from Army Gen. David H. Petraeus on future troop levels in Iraq.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
The Clinton’s have laughed ever since the convention. The look on Michelle Obama’s face during Hillary’s speech and Bill’s speech was PRICELESS- she was looking pretty hateful. Why did Obama pick 9/11 to do such a thing??? Obama just announced to the world that he is TOO WEAK TO RUN HIS OWN CAMPAIGN!!! he had to run begging to the Clinton’s. Unreal. What a tell.
Posted by: YumYum | September 11, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
“Country first.
Obama/Biden.”
Which country?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Ah, Ryan C, has come from his disdain and actually looked. But I have to tell you the states that were leaning Obama are actually turning RED RED REDDER by the day.
Ryan, the guy is going to lose. That Map was totally for Obama about two weeks ago.
Gore/Leiberman were doing better in the polls at this point during their election. I have seen a lot of elections. Obama is going to lose.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
wow more lies about muslim bologne…
we are back to 2000 and 2004 again…
same tactics same team…same garbage…
which would mean another 8 years just like we had.
same choice to spend our next 8 years with that same team who tries to play this game of bologne because they have no answers
they have no changes to this policy platform and plan…
the same plan that has been destroying us for 8 years.
how about somebody give is one example of how Mccain is changing anything about the economic platform that has put us here
and please the earmark bologne is the most uneducated argument if you look at who is now on mcCain’s ticket…and that George Bush used the same argument.
but stupid people will be moved by rhetoric rather than going and seeing one campaign has details of the changes to this sinking ship …
one just wants to blindfold Americans with “Obama’s a gay sexist alien from mars who wants to teach buddhism to little children and then harvest their adrenal glands”
Debra
get a new storyline.
and rather than being lazy and using these arguments…go read both of their platforms (you know McCain’s is really simple just photocopy Bush’s…then put bad earmarks…with the caveat not to look at Alaska over the past 2 years percapita ratio of them to other states…and then let the guy who wrote the enron loophole for energy speculators and championed deregulation in the banking industry…make some “small tweaks” as he rewrites it…along with the President of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq …-scheunneman…and then the rest of your lobbyist leadership team have a crack…but still keep it almost exactly the same platform and policies that we have now)
but go read the platforms and educate the fact that one ticket is going to change this crappy road toward the cliff we are on… and one plays games to win an election.
same team same tactics …same 8 years.
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
I didn’t leave the Democrats–they left me. They have become greedy,corrupt and hateful.
It all started with Hillary when the DNC shamefully supported Obama who was clearly weaker and less qualified but was willing to kiss their butts.
So Pelosi, Dean, superdelegates–are you still happy with your choice?
Posted by: sally | September 11, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Let’s see. Obama has gone around talking about Bush. You would think more than half the country would be voting for him given his campaign is about how he’s not Bush. It’s not working. Even thought the majority of polled Americans can’t really stand GWB, Obama can’t seal the deal. Telling. Very telling. He should be up by much more in the polls.
Posted by: Kitty | September 11, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
I am a bandwagon, political fan; I am going to tell everyone whichever candidate I currently think is winning is my candidate. I will quote some polling website but not talk about, healthcare, jobs, education, foreign policy or any other issue. It is not realy important to me. This week I am for McCain, next week after the everyone sees what a fraud his gimmick VP is, I will be for might be for Obama.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Hi, Mack!
The United States of America, of course.
What country are you for?
Lies. Innuendos. Insults. Strawman attacks. Doesn’t the right have ANYTHING to run on?
Obama/Biden
The United States of America, first!
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Cindy in NC…. you’re absolutely correct in saying that we know who Hillary, Chelsea, and Bill will be voting for….Obama, because why would anyone want four more years of Bush/Cheny, because that
s what you’d get with McCain and his VP who’s already under investigation for ethics violations. Why would a woman want to support a woman (Palin) who’s goal is to take away woman’s rights and send everything Hillary has done for women back to the stone age?
Posted by: alwriter60 | September 11, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Chris – check your facts before you type. Obama was in NYC today for the 9/11 ceremonies. Duh – Clinton’s office is in Harlem, that is in NY, just in case you didn’t know!
Posted by: margie | September 11, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“But I have to tell you the states that were leaning Obama”
You mean states like VA, NC and other bastions of red that Obama made into battleground states?
“That Map was totally for Obama about two weeks ago.”
And one week after the best week McCain has ever had, he still remains in the lead.
Seriously, if you want to debate actually political science, first, learn basic math. Then learn that predictions from polls a month and half out from the actual election are sketchy at best.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Michelle Obamas appearance on “the view” was a farce. the Obama campaign sent a list of questions that could not be asked of her, and Barbra Walters being the left wing liberal she is, said no problem
Posted by: Country First | September 11, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Barack Obama:
-unqualified
-undisciplined
-unpresidential
-fights like a 4th grader
Posted by: riley | September 11, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
.
Catherine:
“The real reason why Obama did not select Hillary…
ODE TO OBAMA # 14
Now Obama he whines and he moans
But really he shouldn’t have thrown stones.
He made quite a fuss
Threw Clinton under the bus,
And Palin has hurt him to the bones.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
“It all started with Hillary when the DNC shamefully supported Obama”
When did that happen?
Howard Dean stayed out of the primaries as he should.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Anyone who thinks Hillary has even the slightest shot in 2012 is delusional. Sarah will carry the ticket for 12 more years. That Manhattan elitist isn’t fit to touch Sarah’s shoes. Pantsuits. Please. She’s such a fraud and everyone I know sees it.
Palin ’08, ’12, ’16!
Country First!!!
Posted by: Sue-Anne | September 11, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Make no mistake about it – Bill is in it for the money (and possibly a few other “favors” on the side.) He does not get along with BHO for many reasons, but for a few million dollars, I’m sure he can hold his nose a little while.
Posted by: Carlos | September 11, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
“the Obama campaign sent a list of questions that could not be asked of her, and Barbra Walters being the left wing liberal she is, said no problem”
Another lie told by the right wing.
Just like the thrown away flags and calling Palin a pig.
All the right wing has are bs lies.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Lies. Innuendos. Insults. Strawman attacks. Doesn’t the right have ANYTHING to run on?
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Also Sarah Palin is getting her first interview today. Not only a list of questions not to ask, but it was done on September 11th so Charly Gibson can not press her on any issues. This woman is a fraud
Posted by: Country First | September 11, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Well, after seeing and reading that link is it possible for our country to decide to vote for somebody who is….relevant for the first time in …8 years…i’m not asking that much, i just want somebody that i’m able to understand EVEN if i don’t especially agree with.
Posted by: Avembe | September 11, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“Gore/Leiberman were doing better in the polls at this point during their election”
Not really.
Around this time in 2000, Bush led some polls, Gore led some polls.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
Sally, you’ve confused the Republican Party with the Democratic Party. The Democratic Party is occasionally for the people. The Republicans represent corporate profit.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
The Roe v Wade scare tactic is not going to work on women. Nothing will happen to that law.
But with Obama/Pelosi/Dean in control the second amendment might be in jeopardy. BO votes with them 97% of the time.
There are millions of gun owners aware of BO’s voting records on gun control, and his attempts to hide that record.
The way he flips who can trust his word.
Posted by: riley | September 11, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
“The way he flips who can trust his word.”
Only a fool would trust his word.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
“I remember reading on the TUCC website that their congregation pledges their allegiance to Africa first.”
What a shock, yet another right wing lie.
“A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.”
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
“Hi, Todd Palin!
Alaska, of course.
What country are you for?”
Just asking. I remember reading that Todd is active in the AIP. They want Alaska to leave the USA. Maybe he didn’t read the fine print when he joined.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Meanwhile…in Chapaqua, NY…
Hillary is feverishly busy creating posters for her 2012 campaign run.
And Bill knows Obama is toast.
Posted by: proud lipstick wearing pig | September 11, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“The Roe v Wade scare tactic is not going to work on women.
What scare tactic? McCain proudly proclaims on his website that he wants to overturn Roe v Wade.
“Nothing will happen to that law”
So are you saying McCain is lying?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“I remember reading that Todd is active in the AIP.”
Correction.
Todd Palin was a member of the AIP up until 2002 then his wife ran for higher office. Sarah sent their convention this year a congratulatory video.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Keith, I think you’re wrong, as well.
I think McCain got the attention he wanted with his surprise candidate. I think once the press started noticing that Palin was lying in her campaign speeches, they had to change the narrative quickly.
They came out with the Lipstick-gate lie which worked for about a day or two, until the press noticed that it was a lie as well. Now they’ve noticed the sex-education ad was a lie, too.
I think McCain has peaked here, and one more lie on the trail might finally tip the press against the BS finally.
And once the Clintons get out to campaign…
McCain has peaked. And he never even got to 50%
.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
High level Democrats are admitting in private that they picked the wrong candidate.
McCain sure sent Obama into a tizzy with a woman in lipstick and high heels. Can you imagine how he’d melt against Putin? It’s obvious the presidency is above Obama’s paygrade.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
For all of those that think maverick McCain will be another Bush because he voted with him 90% of the time:
Here’s a comforting thought…
Obama votes with Reid, Pelosi, Dean
97% of the time. And they have a 9%
approval rating.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 11, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
“”I remember reading on the TUCC website that their congregation pledges their allegiance to Africa first.”
What a shock, yet another right wing lie.
“A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.”
Thank you for the correction. They are committed to Africa. Where is the committment to America and the betterment of all Americans? Or is it assumed?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
cindy in nc – since when did Dean get a vote? Only reason the rating is so low is any good bills get vetoed by W.
Posted by: Eric | September 11, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Ryan C…
I’m not positive but I think McCain has said that should be left up to the states.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 11, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
“And they have a 9%
approval rating.”
Spin that Ryan.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Yes, one of TUCC’s credos was a non-negotiable committment to Africa. Another was a committment to the black community and committment to economic parity. You may not find all that there now; the site’s been scrubbed as JPT reported right here on his blog.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Roe v. Wade should be overturned! Abortion is immoral. I didn’t trust McCain to do it, but I know Palin will. She’s doing God’s work, unlike you Democrats!
Palin ’08, ’12, ’16!
Country First!!!
Posted by: Sue-Anne | September 11, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Nice try Cindy, confusing the numbers of voting statistic with approval ratings. However, anyone who knows anything would point out that the two are unrelated. They are both numbers, however, and I congratulate you on recognizing that.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
“Aides traveling with Ms. Palin have reported back to associates that she is a fast study — asking few questions of her policy briefers but quickly repeating back their main points — who already has considerable ease and experience before cameras.
“A former aide in Alaska who had helped prepare Ms. Palin for her campaign debates there said she had a talent for distilling information into digestible sound bites. The aide said she generally prefers light preparatory materials to heavy briefing books, and prefers walking through potential questions and answers with aides to holding mock sessions.
Gee who else had a disdain for big briefing books and let us get attacked on this day 7 years ago.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
McCain thinks Roe v. Wade was a flawed decision. He’s right. McCain has said that he would appoint SC Justices who may one day overturn it. It won’t happen anytime soon, but I hope so too.
Posted by: Fran | September 11, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Congress, made up of Democrats and Republicans, have an approval rating of 9%. It is believed that much of the low approval rating is the apparent inability to defy President Bush.
No spinning necessary, Mack.
Just facts.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
No confusion I see.
McCain votes with Bush 90% of the time. Bush has a 30% approval rating.
Obama votes with the Dems 97% of the time. The Dem Congress has a 9% approval rating. (Down from 16% this summer.)
Looks like more people would agree with McCain’s votes than with Obama’s.
If you don’t understand that now, you will in November.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Bill is smarter than Obama.
Bill is setting him for a big fall.
Posted by: lm | September 11, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
.
Mack:
“Only a fool would trust his word.”
That includes his claimed Christian faith.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
“And they have a 9%
approval rating.”
Spin that Ryan.
Easily done Mack.
Congress ALWYAS has terrible ratings. If they get above 40% that means they are well liked.
However, the approval ratings for any given Congressmen or Senator will likely be at least 40% and likely higher(the overwhelming majority are above 50%).
How can that be? Well its has to do with psychological reactions.
People hate Congress which is an entity to put all of the country’s failures upon but love their Congressional rep.
I know that must be confusing to a right winger. It requires actual thinking.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
“Gee who else had a disdain for big briefing books and let us get attacked on this day 7 years ago.”
LOL! The plan was developed and put into action under clinton’s watch – not to mention the first WTC bombing. It’s quite disengenuous to blame Bush for 9/11, but I understand liberal frustration and desparation.
Posted by: Rob | September 11, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
If Dems were really worried about Roe v. Wade, they should have nominated Hillary. You know, a Dem who could actually win the election.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
mkoch – 9% and 97% are percentages not numbers, nice try
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 11, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I hear the hostility and jealousy of the lunatic right. Hahahaha.
Between Obama, Biden Bill and Hill. Palin/McCain are in trouble. McCain can’t leave her side because she inexperienced and he weak. hahahahah!
Even Britain and Europe know who is the better candidate. The only one who don’t get it are the puppet ignorant right.
When conservatives call liberals elitists I take as a complement.
Posted by: Dana | September 11, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Sue-Anne, abortion may very well be immoral. However, some people would disagree. It is often said that you can’t legislate morality – if people are FORCED to be moral, are they really being moral?
If I were you, rather than misstating your opponent’s intent, I’d suggest coming up with compelling arguments to support your view.
If you could convince me God exists, and you know what God thinks, and that life begins at conception, and that at conception we are all granted souls, then I’d be on your side in a minute.
Seriously.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
If you don’t have anything constructive to say, throw out a smear. Just like Obama.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“Congress ALWYAS has terrible ratings.”
The lowest in history? Can you spin it a bit better than that?
Posted by: steve | September 11, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Cindy – :)
Actually, they are BOTH percentages AND numbers.
However, “voting with” percentages STILL has nothing to do with approval ratings.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
It isn’t just overturning Roe v. Wade. Sarah Will make sure that a constitutional amendment banning that sinful practice altogether gets passed. She’ll veto everything until it happens. She’s doing GOD’S work. Everyone I know knows it!
Palin ’08, ’12, ’16!
Country First!!!
Posted by: Sue-Anne | September 11, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“It’s quite disengenuous to blame Bush for 9/11,”
Aug 6th Presidential Daily Briefing on Bin Laden
“….patterns show preparations for a hijacking or other similar attacks including surveillance of Federal buildings in New York”
Bush thru sheer incompetence let us get hit on 9/11. He then lied to us to go to war with Iraq.
Its funny how Republicans thump their chest about how we haven’t been hit since 9/11 conveniently forgetting they allowed that attack to commence.
Same thing with McCain thumps his chest about surge success (something Gen Petreaus has warned is fragile) while pretending he did not go along with the Bush administration lies.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“I hear the hostility and jealousy of the lunatic right. ”
You’d better have your hearing checked. Seems like ever since Palin entered the race there has been nothing but whining comong from Barry. Ready to whine on day one.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
“The lowest in history”
That would be George Bush, the last fluff governor with conservative credentials the Republicans offered up as leader of the country.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
John McCain is a sell-out and exposed he is just a typical Republican politician by picking Palin. He picked her to appease his base, poach Hillary votes and stoke a class divide. Palin wasn’t the best or most qualified, it’s because he knew she would be a draw to small town America whom they are duping (Sara Palin ain’t like you, folks).
How is this being a “maverick”? How is it ‘Country First”? How is this “I rather win a war than loose an election”? I’ll say it again, John McCain is a sell-out. Obama said it pretty accurately too – Lipstick on a pig, is still a pig.
The most important metric for picking a VP is they are ready to step in from day one. His judgment is reckless and he gambled at our expense. The mere fact Palin is being educated on foreign policy and is avoiding the press indicates she wasn’t prepared on day one. She is running for the second highest office, but can’t answer questions from the press or public? This doesn’t alarm anyone?
I lost all my respect for John McCain. He’s not the hero today he was 35 years ago. McCain is nothing without Palin.
What does it say about a campaign that has to “mimic” what and whom Obama is, not to mention hijack Obamas core message of Change from day one just to poach votes? Is that all they view Obama as, a “product” a “formula”, a “personality”? It makes McCain look weak and more importantly, the American people stupid if they fall for it.
Now all these puppets are willing to just get behind her without even knowing anything about her and try to convince the American public she is prepared to be VP or President? Not even uncertain objectiveness, caution, pause or question just because she has an “R” in front of her name? How can anyone make a honest, clear determination reasonably in less than 60 days?
Bravo America! We look like complete idiots once again while the world watches. I am truly embarrassed of my country. I guess all isn’t lost, at least many will have Palin’s eye glass frames while our country crumbles economically. We are such tools.
Posted by: Laura | September 11, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Cut taxes for 95% of Americans. How do you cut taxes the 20% plus that don’t even pay taxes?
You give them a “rebate” (even though they never paid any income tax).
Where does the rebate come from — the top 2% who don’t get a rebate and already pay 80% of the income tax revenue.
Another name — Socialism.
That’s why Europe is in love with Obama. They want the USA to join their ranks as a Socialist nation.
Posted by: susie | September 11, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
I hear the hostility and jealousy of the lunatic right. Hahahaha.
Between Obama, Biden Bill and Hill. Palin/McCain are in trouble. McCain can’t leave her side because she inexperienced and he weak. hahahahah!
Even Britain and Europe know who is the better candidate. The only one who don’t get it are the puppet right-wing.
When conservatives call liberals elitists I take as a complement.
Posted by: Dana | September 11, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Mary Lou, when we point out McCain votes with Bush, we are pointing out that McCain is a continuation of Bush’s policies, and that he is misrepresenting himself when he claims to be change.
Bush has a low approval rating, and Congress has a lower one.
They are two independent things, unrelated.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
McCain = Ready to Lead on Day One
Obama = Ready to Whine on Day One
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“Same thing with McCain thumps his chest about surge success (something Gen Petreaus has warned is fragile) while pretending he did not go along with the Bush administration lies. ”
Uh Biden went along too. He is a true patriot though right? You know Biden, the guy that undercut Barry’s slogan of change.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
I think rich people are the most unpatriotic people in this country.
Look at all this country has to offer you in terms of opportunity and you guys complain about paying your fair share of taxes.
Why do you hate America rich people?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Whining on the left, Mack?
It’s been about a week, and what have we heard?
You can’t question McCain, because he was a POW.
You can’t question Palin, because she’s a socccer mom.
All I’ve heard from Republicans is whining about lipsticks and pigs, and a bunch of lies to go with it.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Does anyone really believe that the Clinton’s really want Obama elected? The best thin that can happen is that Obama loses. Then Hillary can run again in 4 years. If Obama wins, the Clinton’s have to wait 8 years to run again. If Obama wins, she can’t run against the sitting president. Obama is foolish to trust the Clinton’s to bail him out. They want him to lose as bad as anyone on the right does.
Posted by: Marine76 | September 11, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Bill must have not read his briefing books either — (he was busy with personal business in the Oval office).
So how did he respond to the first World Trade Center bombing?
The Embassy bombings?
The Cole bombing?
Why didn’t he get Osama when he had a chance?
Somalia?
Posted by: susie | September 11, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Mack,
Is that an admission that that the Biuh administration lied to get us into Iraq and McCain was full throated in support for the war?
I will stipulate that Biden voted for the IWR.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
A percentige has one of these: %. A number does not. The number 0.09 is the same as the percentage 9%. That is their rating.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 11, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Wow! what an underwhelming press release. Clinton will campaign for obama when he gets around to it. or just perhaps Clinton gets too busy to do it. He hasn’t committed to anything. Bill sharp as ever playing little BARRY LIKE A FIDDLE.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“There you go,” Obama said. “You can take it from the president of the United States. He knows a little something about politics.”
I guess even obama knows he’s inexperienced to encourage people to take Clinton’s word instead of his.
Posted by: ChangeYouCanBeLeaving | September 11, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
“Aug 6th Presidential Daily Briefing on Bin Laden”
That’s all you’ve got to pin 9/11 on Bush? Like that was the first time that intelligence showed that terrorists were planning on using transportation as a terror tactic? Read the investigative report and then get back to us. It doesn’t blame Bush for 9/11 in case you just want to know how it ended, but don’t let that fact ruin your hate-fest. And what’s your excuse for the first WTC attack?
Posted by: Rob | September 11, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
There’s a major flaw in the 90% argument.
And that is the 10% of the time McCain DIDN’T vote with Bush. There are some major issues in that 10%. For instance, McCain voted against the Bush tax cuts twice. And he voted against Cheney’s Oil Bill (which Obama voted for). McCain earned the “maverick” label by bucking his own party throughout the years, much to their chagrin.
What major issue has Obama voted against the Dems on?
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
marylou – what major issue has Obama voted on period.
Posted by: marine76 | September 11, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
“I think rich people are the most unpatriotic people in this country.”
Why? They pay the bulk of the taxes.
“Look at all this country has to offer you in terms of opportunity and you guys complain about paying your fair share of taxes.”
Yes, there’s plenty of opportunity. So why do you expect those who have worked hard to hand over their rewards to you instead of getting up and working for your own rewards?
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Ryan -
What is “fair share”?
Over 40% of the of those who earn $40,000 or less pay no income taxes.
80% of the income tax revenue is paid by 2% the top income earners.
Doesn’t sound fair to me.
There should be a flat tax rate.
Everyone should give their fair share.
The country survived over a 100 years with no Federal Income Tax. Once there was Taxes on income, government just got bigger and spent all it could.
Posted by: susie | September 11, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
“So how did he respond to the first World Trade Center bombing?”
The perpetrators were arrested and now sit in SuperMax.
“The Embassy bombings?”
He initiated military strikes into Sudan and Afghanistan. 4 of the people involved were arrested and tried and got life.
“The Cole bombing?”
Clinton left office 3 months later. We weren’t sure it was Al Queda until months after the attack.
“Why didn’t he get Osama when he had a chance?”
John McCain claims he knows how to get Bin Laden, why does he tell Bush so he can do that?
Let’s also remember Bush from the comfort fo the White House telling the terrorists to “bing it on”. The terrorists then proceeded to kill and maim thousands of US service men and women.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
If Dems were really worried about Roe v. Wade, they should have nominated Hillary. You know, a Dem who could actually win the election.
Posted by: marylou | Sep 11, 2008 4:07:03 PM
That’s about the stupiest thing I’ve ever read.
Posted by: d | September 11, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
It’s called Socialism, marylou. An apparently uncurabely and crippling disease.
Posted by: Rob | September 11, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
The MSM told us Clinton lost his political mojo. He did not understand the internet age of campaigning. Another flip flop
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
The Dems had full control over who their nominee would be. Neither Obama nor Hillary had the required number of pledge delegates, so it fell to the Superdelegates to choose the nominee. Their sole duty is to put forth the strongest candidate. They failed miserably.
Having failed, they further sealed their fate by not insisting that Obama choose Hillary as VP. Instead they disregarded the will of 18 million voters.
The Democrats’ chickens are coming home to roost.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“What major issue has Obama voted against the Dems on?”
MaryLou, this is a red herring.
The issue is not how much you vote against your own party.
The issue is whether you agree with policies that are failing. Obama doesn’t have to break away from Democrats.
But it was a nice try.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Attacking Palin as if she’s the reason for Obama’s slip. Hey, look at the shallow one himself.
You can’t wave your arms in the air and make one liners. You need substance. Street cred doesn’t do it. Even his donations are drying up as people realize he’s not the person he pretends to be and that his positions come and go like the wind.
Posted by: dl | September 11, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Bill, a compulsive liar, told Barry ´Don´t have inadequate relationships at the Oval Office´
Posted by: Alan | September 11, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
“What is “fair share”?”
I am fine with the progressive tax system we have in place and see no problem with raising the rates to Clinton’s day/
“Over 40% of the of those who earn $40,000 or less pay no income taxes.”
Yes but they all pay sales & payroll taxes. The only ones who don’t pay income taxes are those earning below the poverty level or those with deductions for children.
“80% of the income tax revenue is paid by 2% the top income earners.”
Not true
in 2005 the top 10% of taxpayers paid 69.7% of the total income taxes collected by the federal government.
Doesn’t sound fair to me.”
That’s because you listen to the right wing and selectively quote numbers.
There should be a flat tax rate.”
So that the poor, who struggle the most, should have more of the burden?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
So when Obama talks about changing Washington, what he means is he’ll institute the Democratic policies that lead us down the path to Socialism. That isn’t change, and it isn’t anything new.
The best reason of all to vote for the McCain/Palin reform ticket for true change.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Susie, Bill Clinton captured, tried and lockeed away the people involved in the first World Trade Center bombing. Go ahead, look it up.
As for the Cole bombing, the perpetrators were fingered by the CIA about 20 days before the end of Clinton’s term. Perhaps remembering the blame he received for the deaths in Somalia (a situation he inherited from Bush 1) He chose to allow the new administration to deal with it. GWBush chose to not respond, and 8 months later, we paid the price. I’m surprised you don’t know your history better.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
“Is that an admission that that the Biuh administration lied to get us into Iraq and McCain was full throated in support for the war?”
I don’t support Bush, and I didn’t voted for him in either election. I have no idea if he lied outright or was misled himself. The fact is that there are members of both parties that were beating the war drums at the time. If he lied then he deserves to be prosecuted.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
“What major issue has Obama voted against the Dems on?”
MaryLou, this is a red herring.”
No, actually, it’s rhetorical.
Posted by: Rob | September 11, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
“The Dems had full control over who their nominee would be. Neither Obama nor Hillary had the required number of pledge delegates, so it fell to the Superdelegates to choose the nominee.”
Obama won the pledged delegate race. The Supers were not going to overturn the will of the voters. The Supers shoul dbe done away with anyway.
“Their sole duty is to put forth the strongest candidate.”
Obama consistently polled better than Hillary in head to heads with McCain and he showed he had a much stronger on the ground organization and fundraising apparatus.
He is the strongest candidate.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“I don’t support Bush, and I didn’t voted for him in either election.”
Then why in God’s name would you support John McCain who wants to continue Bush;s foreign and economic policy?
Seriously, how does McCain differ from Bush on foreign policy or economic policy?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
The Democratic policies that led to the greatest economic expansion in history? Really, marylou.
Here’s “socialism” for you, marylou:
The roads you drive on. The clean, safe water you drink. The 40 hour work week. Child labor laws. Social security. Free public education. Women’s right to vote. Civil rights.
All of these things were liberal, progressive stands.
Conservatives fought against each and every one of them, crying “socialism!”
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Wasn’t Obama supposed to unite us all? Why then has turned his campaign into a wedge between those who have achieved financial success and those who haven’t? Why is he promoting a victim mentality in order to win votes? Why is he promising massive handouts in order to buy votes? Guess those sessions with mentor Frank Marshall Davis really did influence him after all!
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
“Obama won the pledged delegate race. The Supers were not going to overturn the will of the voters.”
And what about the supers that voted against the will of the people that they represented. Kerry comes to mind.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
“he’ll institute the Democratic policies that lead us down the path to Socialism.”
Last time we heard that was against FDR.
Having single payer healthcare would relieve business from having to contend with rising healthcare costs allowing them to better compete with foreign companies that have government offering similar social programs.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
“Susie, Bill Clinton captured, tried and lockeed away the people involved in the first World Trade Center bombing. Go ahead, look it up.”
I thought we were talking about preventing attacks (flashback to Ryan blaming Bush for letting 9/11 happen), not slapping handcuffs on a few terrorist thugs after the fact. Oh, and BTC let OBL go when he had his chances. After Billy-Jeff’s first encounters with terrorism, what exactly did he do to prevent future attacks? Not a damn thing worth mentioning…
Posted by: Rob | September 11, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Not true, Ryan C. Going into the convention, Hillary was beating both McCain and Obama in head-to-head polls.
Guess they didn’t report that on Daily Kos or Huffington Post for you.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
“And what about the supers that voted against the will of the people that they represented. Kerry comes to mind.”
That cut both ways actually.
Some people said they would vote as their district did and followed thru on that.
Others stated they woudl vote for the pledged delegate winner.
That is the problem with Superdelegate voters, they can vote for whoever they like. I hope they are eliminated from the primary process next election.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
“Wasn’t Obama supposed to unite us all?”
That was just a Madison ave. slogan, like change and hope, that he borrowed from Deval Patrick.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Democrats, please answer:
- Do you really think that the withdrawal of our troops from Irak will make us safer? they will be sent to Afghanistan. Obama wants to increase our soldiers there.
- Do you really think that rising taxes and government spending will help taxpayers and improve the economy? less money for people to live with.
Sounds funny that when socialism has failed in Europe, we want to import it to America. Have a look at Europe and see its disastrous results.
Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 11, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Ryan C., you do know that Obama isn’t for single payer healthcare, don’t you? Dennis Kucinich was the only Dem candidate who was. Obama isn’t even for the Universal Healthcare Hillary supported.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Cindy, percentages ARE numbers, they’re the things we use to count.
Now stop dodging the fact that you lost, the whole “voting with” thing has NOTHING to do with approval ratings.
Further, your analogy is further flawed, because no two Democrats can agree on anything, and there’s no way to judge if Obama voted with Reid, Pelosi and Dean. For instance, I know Obama and Dean opposed the war early on. So stop being silly.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
“Not true, Ryan C. Going into the convention, Hillary was beating both McCain and Obama in head-to-head polls.”
In a single poll.
Noticed I used the word consistently.
RCP has the polls. Many more of them show Obama ahead of McCain than show Hillary ahead of McCain.
Hence Obama consistently outperformed Hillary in head toi heads vs McCain.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
“Ryan C., you do know that Obama isn’t for single payer healthcare, don’t you? Dennis Kucinich was the only Dem candidate who was.”
Kucinich was the only one for an immediate single payer.
Edwards, Obamas and Clinton’s plan have the pathways for us to get to single payer.
Obama has spoken about single payer and he just doesn’t think the country is ready for that infrastructure wise or politically.
“Obama isn’t even for the Universal Healthcare Hillary supported.”
Obama felt that making coverage mandatory for everyone (he mandates coverage for children) would lead to problems like they had in MA.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Stephen – you ask:
- Do you really think that the withdrawal of our troops from Irak will make us safer? they will be sent to Afghanistan. Obama wants to increase our soldiers there.
Answer:Yes. But we need to help fix Iraq, as well. Remember there were no WMDs, they were not a threat and they did not attack us. Saddam is dead, mission accomplished, let’s get out. Al Qaeda is in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and we would do better there. Our actions in Iraq has rallied more terrorists to the cause, and we need to stop that. The next attack will NOT come from Iraq, I’d be keeping an eye on Saudi Arabia, too.
- Do you really think that rising taxes and government spending will help taxpayers and improve the economy? less money for people to live with.
Answer: No, and no one suggests that. The Republican administration has spent MORE than any Democratic one and delivered the least for it. The first intent is to pay down the deficit and we need to get revenue for that. The rich have profited over the past decade while the middle class has suffered, AND the rich got tax cuts to boot.
What WILL improve the economy is investment, both in learning and in new technologies. Just as the internet changed the playing feild, a new technology could lift us out of the current economic crises. It’s not simply a matter or tax/no tax, it’s who and how we tax. The majority of the rich’s money comes from capital gains, and capital gains are taxed at a lower rate than the money we earn.
Rich people pay less taxes.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“- Do you really think that the withdrawal of our troops from Irak will make us safer? they will be sent to Afghanistan. Obama wants to increase our soldiers there.”
Yes. I think going after the terrorist network that attacked us on 9/11 will makes us safer vs killing Iraqis in a civil war we helped foster.
“- Do you really think that rising taxes and government spending will help taxpayers and improve the economy? less money for people to live with.”
Historically the economy performs better under Democrats than it does under Republicans.
Bill Clinton raised taxes, signed SCHIP and balanced the budget.
“Sounds funny that when socialism has failed in Europe, we want to import it to America. Have a look at Europe and see its disastrous results.”
Disastrous results of a better health care system, a better standard of living and a currency that is worth more than ours?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Stephen, I think you might try visiting Europe before you draw too many conclusions. Most of the people from there that I know of are pretty happy. The Euro is moving up in value while the dollar is dropping.
But you have to understand, we are already a mix of socialism and capitalism, and no one is suggesting we go ALL socialist, but we do recognize where it’s been a success. Some social programs have been good, and some have been bad.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“They only wanted to vote for a woman. Now that we have Palin, none of them have a nice word to say about Hillary. She’s such a fraud.”
Sue-Anne, your vote is based on anatomy, then, and not policy or beliefs or record?
Scary.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Bill is introducing Barack to his profoundly adept political hit team.
They, and all their resources, will now work with Barack to formulate false impressions of the Republican candidates
Posted by: michael | September 11, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
considering the obama lemmings chose emotions, speaking ability and youthfulness over experience, issues and leadership, how can they criticize others for supporting sarah palin for such “virtues”?
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Sorry Michael.
In order to win, the Democrats only need to tell the truth about Republicans.
Republicans need to lie in order to maintain power.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Chris -
I don’t. I just find Republican criticism of Obama’s experience equally hypocritical under the circumstances.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
If I was Bill Clinton I would not give Obama the time of day.
Posted by: Nader/Gonzalez08 | September 11, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
McCain gives an interview! First in a month:
Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
just to correct any ignorant notions or mistakes: most of the polls during the Democratic primaries had Senator Clinton doing better against mccain then obama
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
JohnTx,
Actually that was his 2nd interview this month.
He still has not held a press conference or even taken questions from the national pool of reporters following him on the campaign trail.
He canceled with Larry King last week because Campbell Brown humiliated his spox Tucker when Tucker could not come up with an example of Palin leading the AK National Guard.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Chris, you are correct about the poll, but the thing is – polls change. Daily. I think opposing Hillary would have roused the base Right as much as Palin has, if she’s been picked. There’s a lot of Hillary hatred on the right, which is why I find all these crocodile tears laughable.
At this point, I’ll take any progressive over and conservative, and I think Obama would go a long way in making the US the world leader again.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Mkoch, I travelled to Europe and found people really fed up of too many taxes, excessive goverment legislation hindering the private initiative, state organisms full of debts which wasted plenty of money, etc. The socialdemocrats in Germany began with Schroeder to reform the wellfare state because they couldn´t afford the expenses, the same that Sarkozy is trying to carry out in France. Even Blair kept many of the tories´reforms.
America is a great country because many foreign people came here escaping from oppression and looking for a better life. We never had a Hitler, a Mussolini or a Stalin, different types of totalitarians, and I pray God it never happens here.
Denigrating America has become a sport overseas but we have one of the oldest constitutions in the world, 1787 before the French Revolution. We must be proud of this. While in Europe they had old absolute kings, we could vote our presidents.
Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 11, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
“most of the polls during the Democratic primaries had Senator Clinton doing better against mccain then obama”
Out of 54 polls taken between Sept’07 and May’08 (when most polling firms stopped doing head to heads with Hillary), she led in 27 of them with 3 ties.
Out of 83 polls taken between Sept’07 and May’08 (Obama had more polls vs McCain because they both were the presumptive nominees by May)Obama led in 55 of them with 10 ties.
Another right wing lie bites the dust!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
.
mkoch:
“In order to win, the Democrats only need to tell the truth about Republicans. Republicans need to lie in order to maintain power.”
Ever consider the integrity, character shown, and experience instead of party there cowboy?
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
“Chris, you are correct about the poll, but the thing is – polls change.”
Actually mkoch, he is not.
Obama outperformed Hillary consistently throughout the primaries in head to head polling vs McCain.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
“Obama outperformed Hillary consistently throughout the primaries in head to head polling vs McCain. ”
Where does that information come from?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
“Ever consider the integrity, character shown, and experience instead of party there cowboy?”
If my party had a dozen Congressmen and Senators resigning, going to jail or being indicted for everything from bribery to hitting on pages, I would ask that you focus on the candidate too.
Pay no attention to the party, just the party standard bearer!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
mkoch….i think everyone understands that Americans are faced with yet another Presidential election where the major party candidates are nowhere near prepared to be the President we need them to be (only Senator Clinton is capable of being that person)
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
“Where does that information come from?”
Real Clear Politics.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
.
Ryan C
“If my party had a dozen Congressmen and Senators resigning, going to jail or being indicted for everything from bribery to hitting on pages, I would ask that you focus on the candidate too.”
Thanks. Considering the past records of both parties, it’s time integrity, character shown, and experience count.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Aye.. I find it very interesting that McCain talks about his history of routing out corruption and then chastising Obama for not doing the same against his own party. Unfortunately for McCain, nearly every instance of corruption in the last 30 years has been Republican.
Posted by: johnTX | September 11, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
it’s time integrity,”
Woudl that be the McCain integrity after launching negative ad after negative ad with misleading and at times sleazy attacks, McCain blames Obama for the environment because Obama did not join him for townhalls. s McCain in control of his own campaign or not?
“character shown, ”
Would that be the character that caused him to drop his long held position against offshore drilling when it became politically popular?
Would that be character that called Bush’s tax cuts irresponsible during a time of war that he now wants to make permanent?
Would that be charcter that caused a victim of torture to suddenly think torture is ok?
Would that charcter be the guy who hired a man for his campaign that 8 years ago smeared his then 2 year old daughter?
“and experience count.”
What good is experience when you couple it with poor judgmen
McCain says he knows how to get Bin Laden. Well why the hell isn’t he telling Bush?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Billw, you ask -
“Ever consider the integrity, character shown, and experience instead of party there cowboy?”
Yes, that’s exactly what I’m talking about. Republicans are lacking in all of those things I’m afraid, so they have to pretend their candidate was called a pig.
Notice that the people who asked an actual policy question slinked off when they were answered with firm logical points.
Every conservative attack on this thread has been an insult, a lie, or a psychic prediction of future events.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
i’m a progressive/liberal, and i cannot trust obama, especially given his hypocrisy, his horrendous judgment (subjecting his daughters to the occasional, yet disruptive and hateful rants of his pastor), and the hate and racism and sexism that he has intentionally or unintentionally inspired in many of his supporters (intimidating and harassing African-American supporters of Clinton is only one example). That is not the “change” i want. of course, mccain and palin do not have the policies i agree with, but i am more comfortable with the devils i know then the one i don’t. in any case, i would be unable to look my child in the eye and sleep well at night if i voted for a lesser candidate. Thus, I will be writing in Senator Clinton’s name on November 4th.
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Hi Ryan -
You may be right, I read polls that told the story either way. At any rate, polls ask likely voters with land lines, and the Democrats out register Republicans in the millions. I’d have taken either Clinton or Obama, frankly.
And I think Obama will make a superb president.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
the links i provided have the polls showing that Clinton would have fared much better than obama against mccain, more often then not…
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Hi Stephen -
You wrote:
“Mkoch, I travelled to Europe and found people really fed up of too many taxes, excessive goverment legislation hindering the private initiative, state organisms full of debts which wasted plenty of money, etc.”
I, too, have travelled and found no such sentiment. We must hang out with different crowds.
As to people wanting to move hear, most of the Euros and Aussies and Canadians I know laugh that off.
The people who want to move here generally are the poorer ones who have no opportunities, or the richer ones who don’t want to pay their taxes. The middle class seems pretty content.
But that’s just my experience.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
chris, if you are honest and sincere in your argument, I can only say that writing in Clinton will do nothing but help put McCain in office.
I’d like to hope you reconsider, and stop putting such faith in conservative talking points.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
.
Ryan C
I’ll answer one specific:
“McCain says he knows how to get Bin Laden. Well why the hell isn’t he telling Bush? ”
Bush wouldn’t know what to do with Bin Laden if he had him in chains in his back yard.
McCain has a background of loyal service and sacrifice to the country.
Obama’s background pales in comparison.
In fact his disrespect, if not loyalty to the country has been questioned due to his actions.
.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
“the links i provided have the polls showing that Clinton would have fared much better than obama against mccain, more often then not…”
They erase links on the blog.
Just tell me where I can find them.
Again out of 54 polls between 9/07 and 5/08, Hillary won 27.
Out of 83 polls between 9/07 and 5/08 Obama won 55.
Also Obama margin over McCain was on average higher than Hillary’s lead over McCain.
My source are all the polls taken which are listed on Real Clear Politics.
What is your source?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
.
mkoch:
“Every conservative attack on this thread has been an insult, a lie, or a psychic prediction of future events”
An extreme and gross statement. Typical of Obama supporters.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
“McCain has a background of loyal service and sacrifice to the country.”
His greatest loyalty and service seems to be ended when he left that prison camp.
His loyalty and sacrifice since then has been at best a mixed bag.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Oh, and Rob, from way back -
Clinton caught, tried, convicted and locked up the people responsible for the first World Trade Center attack. That was what the question was.
Now you seem to want him to be psychic and predict an attack from a different group of people seven years later? When another man had been in office for 8 months and had demoralized the FBI agent in charge of investigating Bin Ladin so much that he quit and demoted Richard Clarke from his assignment on Al Qaeda?
Like I say, all you need is truth and facts to dismantle conservative arguments.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
mkoch wrote:
“Every conservative attack on this thread has been an insult, a lie, or a psychic prediction of future events”
BillW wrote:
An extreme and gross statement. Typical of Obama supporters.
And I reply:
Which manages to be both an insult and a lie.
:)
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Chris,
The electoral vote maps were a joke with most of the polling months old.
Again head to head polls consistently show Obama outperforming Hillary when faced with McCain.
Also Hillary struggled to raise her favorable rating to be a net positive.
Whereas McCain and Obama enjoy favorability ratings that are quite high.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Go McCain / Palin. America is with you
Posted by: Sue | September 11, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
ryan c…..given his own vulnerabilities and weakness when faced with only mild ads against him (the “3 AM” ad and his losing 3 of 4 primaries, despite winning 11 in a row and outspending Clinton nearly 2 to 1), the last few months of the primaries resulting in state by state polling showing Clinton beating mccain more handily then obama, is evidence that the voters trusted her more to survive the inevitably aggressive campaign that mccain, and more importantly, conservative special interest groups not unlike the swift boat vets, would rain down upon the democratic nominee….obama has obviously proven these fears correct, employing a supposed “attack dog” in biden, but has still wilted considerably against the bite and bark of palin’s selection…..either as VP, but probably more so as the Presidential nominee, Senator Clinton would have thrived under such harsh conditions, as she and her husband have been notably invulnerable to the republican and conservative attack machine for over a decade……even if obama is capable of doing half of what he promises (which is vague and incomprehensible in the first place, given his abstract speeches and the fact that his lemmings have consistently failed to articulate such policiy positions when asked for them), what good would those promises be if he is unable to defeat mccain/palin and the conservative special interest groups?
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Actually, Sue, maybe half of America is with McCain/Palin. The other half is with Obama/Biden.
Country, not Corporations, first!
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
ryan c…..nice rove-ian argument, attack the credibility of the polls that don’t favor you……also, ask Al Gore which numbers matter more: national polls, or electoral votes….
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
mkoch…..obama claims to not take corporate or lobbyist funds, but he has no problem taking money from their ceo’s and spouses, respectively….rules were made to have loopholes…
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
mkoch wrote:
“Every conservative attack on this thread has been an insult, a lie, or a psychic prediction of future events”
BillW wrote:
“An extreme and gross statement. Typical of Obama supporters.”
mkoch replied:
“Which manages to be both an insult and a lie. :) ”
A liar eh? Name-calling is also *very* typical of Obama supporters. It’s a loser’s last resort.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Chris, as best as I can tell, Obama is still leading electorally in both electoral summations I can find.
The only thing that will make him lose is Democrats and progressives splitting up. There are millions more registered Democrats than Republicans. Republicans know this and will try to splinter off as many as they can.
Don’t fall for it.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
ryan c….also, considering the democratic primaries ENDED months ago with obama as the nominee, it would be hard to find polls now that compare how Clinton would fare against mccain as opposed to how obama would fare….
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Chris,
She lost.
She lost because she made poor choices in her advisers and strategy.
The right wing was going to come with knives out, that I certainly agree with.
But Hillary had so much baggage and such a built in public perception, there is no way she wins the general election.
And her selection as VP?
We’ve seen how much of an attack dog she has been so far this campaign season and to describe my reaction as underwhelmed would be accurate.
Her heart’s not in it. And if her heart would only be in it when she stood to gain personally from it, then she doesn’t deserve the job in the first place.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
BillW, if you’ll notice, I did not call you anything. I called your statement a lie.
This is what I mean, conservatives have to rephrase everything an opponent says in order to object to it.
It’s a false debating tactic.
Are you calling me a loser? Because someone once told me name-calling is a loser’s tactic. Not that I would accuse you of that, I just want you to know some people might see it that way.
Cheers. thanks for playing.
:)
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
“also, considering the democratic primaries ENDED months ago with obama as the nominee, it would be hard to find polls now that compare how Clinton would fare against mccain as opposed to how obama would fare.”
That’s why I used the sample of 9/07 thru 5/08. That takes us thru the primary season from the first debates thru most of the elections.
When I said old info I was referring to the electoral college poll which had some updated polling but alot of it was from Feb & March. IOW, the map tells you
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
BillW, your attempt at Gospel…needs work.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“A liar eh? Name-calling is also *very* typical of Obama supporters. It’s a loser’s last resort.”
Lies and hypocrisy, thy name is Republican.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
hypocrisy is obama’s middle name, and i’ve been voting Democrat since 1992 (“unity and hope” whilst his supporters harass and intimidate others who don’t support his holiness) (against off-shore drilling, now for it) (doesn’t take corporate/lobbyist dollars, just from their officers and spouses, and also has them working for him)(stands for the people, except when they live in sub-standard housing owned by his friend/donor rezko)
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Well, now we know Palin has dropped the Bridge to nowhere reference from her speeches and that she “didn’t blink” when asked to run.
I think the former is news, but I’m not sure about the second.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
ryan c…..so older polling matters more then the latest polling towards the end of the primaries? does the word “trending” mean something to you?
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
.
mkoch:
“BillW, if you’ll notice, I did not call you anything. I called your statement a lie.”
Hey cowboy, labeling what I said as a lie, is calling me a liar and is name-calling. Then since you threw the first stone re name-calling, I returned it by calling you a loser.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
chris, are you a Democrat? Or liberal? Or even a centrist? You seem to work for the RNC. You like to spread their talking points at any rate.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
.
mkoch:
“BillW, your attempt at Gospel…needs work.”
Agreed. It will be finished in the coming days. :)
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Actually, you called me a cowboy, first.
:)
If you voluntarily want to take on the mantle of “liar”, I can accept that. If you don’t, I’d consider keeping your statements in the realm of provable truth.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
ryan c…..considering that obama unfairly and maliciously used the race card by implying that Clinton disrespected MLK when all she did was acknowledge LBJ’s contribution to the Civil Rights Movement was emotional manipulation at its core…..she may have lost the nomination, but not at the cost of her principles, and in no small part due to those easily brainwashed by obama
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Billw, I look forward to it.
Just don’t expect me to be a believer.
:)
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
.
Ryan C:
“Lies and hypocrisy, thy name is Republican.”
Now now pilgrim, not so quick. I was for Hillary Clinton.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
.
mkoch:
“Actually, you called me a cowboy, first. :) ”
Not one of my better traits. However the lavel is relatively innocolous as compared to liar. :)
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
mkoch…i am a liberal/progressive and i have become very frustrated with the direction this new democratic party has turned…..pelosi lacks the bite or courage to finally use the democratic majority to bring justice to this worst administration in the history of our nation, or bring about the good policies and plans for which the democratic party used to stand for…..furthermore, the anger, arrogance, ignorance, naivete, sexism and racism as displayed constantly by those who supposedly support obama is an example, coupled with their comparative lack of knowledge about the actual details of his policies (much of which were influenced or borrowed from those of Clinton) is narcissistic at best and dangerously cult-like at worst…..Clinton may have no chance at becoming our next President, much as America, our children and our troops need her, because mccain and obama don’t measure up, but that doesn’t mean i have to stand by and watch as the mob mentality of obama’s lemmings (who are not all of obama’s supporters) attack and harass and falsely accuse anyone of racism for the simple fact that they don’t support obama…..
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
.
mkoch:
“Billw, I look forward to it. Just don’t expect me to be a believer. :) ”
I understand. Bless you and the horse you rode in on, anyway.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
“considering that obama unfairly and maliciously used the race card by implying that Clinton disrespected MLK when all she did was acknowledge LBJ’s contribution to the Civil Rights Movement was emotional manipulation at its core…”
Actually, I agree with you there on that one, Chris.
That was BS of the highest order.
Of course, Clinton laid the groundwork for the right’s attacks on Obama, so neither side is innocent.
But I don’t need innocence. I need politician who are ready to fight for common Americans, not tax cuts for bloated corporations. Ones that understands the delicate balance between capitalism and social responsibility that makes us the country that we are. One that knows sacrificing freedoms for some faux security IS letting the terrorists win.
The Republican have shown they haven’t learned these things yet.
Thus, without fanaticism or blindness, but with pragmatic, guarded optimism:
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Billw -
Smile, when you call me that…
:)
I’ll apologize if you can tell me where that’s from…
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Dreaming: Obama/Clinton ticket. If the Clintons go to bat for Obama during these last 50+ days of campaigning and help him WIN ‘handily’ all is forgiven. Bill and Hill are back in my good graces (which they lost campaigning against Barack). Nothing says Power more than the Clintons.
Posted by: bette | September 11, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Bam is a worldbeater and the
next POTUS.
Posted by: anon | September 11, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
.
mkoch:
I’ll apologize if you can tell me where that’s from…
You mean the ‘Bless you” bit? I don’t know it’s origin, but I heard it at least 30 years ago. Thanks, but no apology needed.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
“mkoch…i am a liberal/progressive and i have become very frustrated with the direction this new democratic party has turned….”
Chris, I feel your pain and agree with you up to the point of doing anything whatsoever that would allow the current gang to remain in power.
In 2001 we had a single opportunity – a horrible event, and one I would never want to happen – but what could have been turned into a chance of uniting the world forever against terrorism and hate was opportunistically used to shore up power for a political party.
I can’t let that continue, and for all Obama’s faults (and understand, I voted Clinton in the primaries and hated how the media treated her) for all Obama’s faults, he will be a better president than John McCain could ever dream of being.
So I will support and vote for Obama.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
.
Looks like I’ve wasted another perfectly good hour, as the Tappan Brothers say.. Oh well, you people be nice now, but don’t overdo it… :)
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
BillW -
I meant the “Smile, when you call me that”
line.
It’s from an old western.
If, sir, you perceive that I called you a liar, I do indeed apologize. I try not to do that.
However, I will say that I have yet to find in recent days a conservative attack that did include, sir, a certain shading of the truth, a certain exaggeration or omission of fact, and have found that simply looking at the actual event has disproven much of the bluster. No doubt this is true on both sides, but for myself, I try to keep the debate in the realm of facts.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
.
mkoch:
“I will say that I have yet to find in recent days a conservative attack that did include, sir, a certain shading of the truth, a certain exaggeration or omission of fact”
Then you’re not looking closely, but your statement is indeed true with regard to me. Thanks. Otherwise a Freudian slip and please disregard my thanks.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
What did Bill have for lunch – crow? Bill has disappointed me – after being called a racist – but I guess he has no choice but to do it or else he will be maligned by the Dems and the African Americans. So he has to eat crow and humble pie – I am surprised it did not stick in his craw! The Dems have really disappointed me this time around – they have put Party before Country. Bill, Hill and Joe have all said that BHO is not fit to be Prez – I believe them the first time! I definitely don’t believe them now!
Posted by: Beckie | September 11, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Oops, my bad. That’s what I get for trying to talk edycated like a city slicker.
I suspect, though, you got my point.
:)
I’m sure you’ll disagree, but all I’ve seen from the right are smears, innuendos, outright lies, manufactured outrage, and a staggering amount of misdirection.
When there is actual substance, they tend to slink away.
But that’s just my perspective. :)
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Actually, Beckie, I think the Clintons meant as compared to THEM, Obama wasn’t ready to lead. But compared to McCain? Oh yeah, he’s ready.
Think of it as running against the Keystone Cops.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
.
mkoch:
“I’m sure you’ll disagree, but all I’ve seen from the right are smears, innuendos, outright lies, manufactured outrage, and a staggering amount of misdirection.”
Hey, I tried to be nice, but you won’t let well enough alone. Please be specific now, and state verbatim exactly which of my statements you object to. I’ll be back later or tomorrow to reply. You can count on it.
.
Posted by: Billw | September 11, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
mkoch, You are willing to settle for 2nd best – not me!
Posted by: Beckie | September 11, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
“Hey, I tried to be nice, but you won’t let well enough alone. ”
I wasn’t speaking of you, Billw, I was referring to the 99% of the other posters out there. I don’t consider you “the right” or the spokesman for it.
Most of the posts have been drive-by smears, no substance, just as I said. Your initial comment to me was free of that, and I give you credit for it.
As to your initial comment, I’m all for “integrity, character shown, and experience” and I saw that in McCain in 2000, but not in 2008. I see more of it in Obama, today.
In McCain I see a man who embraced his opponent when he should have decked him, and who has reversed himself on all the important things and the only reason I can see for this is naked ambition.
I am certain you have a different interpretation, and you’re welcome to try to convince me.
I would like that, I WANT a right wing that can defend their beliefs without resorting to O’Reilly debate techniques: Lies. Innuendos. Insults. Strawman attacks.
The rest of the conservative posters have been less polite than you, however, and less than factual.
The Virginian: If you want to call me that, smile!
Trampas: With a gun against my belly, I – I always smile!
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
Beckie, I’ll take second best over continuing the worst any day.
But I’m a practical man.
Posted by: mkoch | September 11, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
They also spoke about what the next president can do to help make the economy work for all Americans, as it did under Pres. Clinton…
Posted by: d0 | September 11, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
Obama will have no chance of regaining any momentum now that the new girl in town, Sarah Palin has spoken. Obama and his clan of far left radicals may have lost his minimal lead permanently.
Palin’s speech was tremendous. Hillary’s speech was terrific. We have seen two women with ambition and love for our country demonstrate to the world a vitality that will not be forgotten. With Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama could have made history – but instead, Obama chose not to do so. Now McCain and his VP pick are doing just that.
Obama hogged history. So Hillary’s 18 million voters watching her speech will likely produce no gain for Obama. Instead, it will lay the basis for a lasting resentment at Obama’s failure to select her as VP. Palin’s presence was the icing on the cake.
Obama can’t win the votes of women, especially older women.
The combination of Hillary’s speech the other night and Sarah Palin’s speech, made Obama’s chance of winning those women voters a lot harder, if not impossible.
Posted by: Al from NJ | September 12, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am
Obama, a 1\2 black African, was in HARLEM to visit Pres. Clinton, 1\1 white…wait did I get that UPSIDE DOWN (who went to whom?)
The Clintons owe a lot of money for Hillary’s failed campaign, and after Palin enters the race, Obama goes to Slick Willie’s HARLEN office, and Obama says that President Clinton is the smartest man in politics! Then why did Hillary lose to a junior senator? Guess Obama blinked (but it is not really his money anyway). Is that the way Obama will deal with Iran?
Obama wants to get away from personal characterics and to issues–but what issue is involved with LIPSTICK?
The democratic party has to be the DUMMIEST on record for this election to even be close!
Billy Bob, Florida where Obama said our votes could not count BEFORE he said they could count. Flip-flop!
Posted by: Billy Bob | September 12, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN EVEN BEFORE HE PICKED PALIN….BUT THAT WAS THE ICING, AS THEY SAY….CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN, MAVERICKS, REFORMERS…..COUNTRY FIRST!
Not waiting another 24 years (since Ferraro)to see a woman get this opportunity to lead our country. Hillary is even voting McCain/Palin.
Posted by: Debra | September 13, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm