By Jennifer Parker

Sep 30, 2008 10:06am

Bush Warns Economic Damage Could Be ‘Painful and Lasting’

ABC News’ Jennifer Duck reports: After Congress failed to pass a $700 billion financial rescue bill yesterday, President Bush made a plea to Congress Tuesday morning to act now or "the economic damage will be painful and lasting." 

This is the sixth time in the past two weeks President Bush cleared his schedule to make remarks specifically on the economy.

"The reality is that we are in an urgent situation, and the consequences will grow worse each day if we do not act," he said. 

"The dramatic drop in the stock market that we saw yesterday will have a direct impact on the retirement accounts, pension funds, and personal savings of millions of our citizens. And if our nation continues on this course, the economic damage will be painful and lasting."

The president added the more than 777-point drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average yesterday represented more than a trillion dollars in losses.

Speaking directly to Congress he said, "We’re facing a choice between action and the real prospect of economic hardship for millions of Americans. And for the financial security of every American, Congress must act."

Bush admitted he was "disappointed" by the vote yesterday but emphasized urgency in getting a new bill into law. "Producing legislation is complicated, and it can be contentious.  It matters little what a path a bill takes to become law. What matters is that we get a law."

Since many members are off today for the Jewish holiday Rosh Hashanah, the legislation would come Wednesday at the earliest. 

However, the president noted his economic team will be working closely and talking with both parties in Congress today. 

Both presidential candidates called the president this morning about the failed bailout bill.

“Senator McCain and Senator Obama each called and spoke to the President this morning regarding the financial crisis," White House spokesman Tony Fratto said. "Both calls were very constructive, and the President appreciated hearing from them.  The senators offered ideas and reaffirmed what they have said publicly – that this is a critical issue that needs to be addressed.  We’re not going to comment on specific ideas, but we appreciate hearing them and will continue to work with congressional leaders on ideas that will help the economy."

Some of the ideas being considered for the bill include extending Federal Deposit Insurance to more accounts, something Obama advocated this morning, and eliminating the mark-to-market rule that makes financial decision-makers show their losses in real time.

User Comments

The public policy behind FDIC insurance is to provide a safety net to small depositors who don’t have the ability to do bank credit analysis.
FDIC insurance works well for small depositors. No small depositor has lost money in a bank account since the FDIC was established and small depositors don’t’ have to be bank credit analysts. The $100,000 insurance limit covers the deposits of most citizens and businesses in America. And, for most depositors that have more than $100,000, it is easy to split up deposits between institutions so that each insured deposit is under $100,000.
FDIC insurance is supposed to protect depositors, not undercapitalized banks.
The rationale for expanding FDIC insurance is to protect undercapitalized and non-competitive banks from the harsh reality of their actions and financial position. That isn’t the purpose of FDIC insurance and the public mission of the FDIC shouldn’t be expanded to protect bad banks. Large depositors are supposed to evaluate the credit of their banks and not do business with banks that are crummy credits. The essence of market discipline is that bad credits can’t borrow money and it shouldn’t be any different for banks. If commercial banks want to deal with large businesses, then they need to make sure that they have the appropriate capital base and are a good credit risk. This isn’t the first time in American history that large commercial depositors have had to decide which banks are acceptable and which are not. Such is the meaning of market discipline.
The problem of $100,000 insurance limits isn’t even a real problem. There are good private and public alternatives that extend FDIC limits.
Banks that belong to Promontory Interfinancial Network can offer banking deposits up to $50 million that qualify for FDIC insurance. There are approximately 2,500 institutions that belong to Promontory and are able to provide FDIC insurance on very large deposits. Using a $1 million deposit as an example, through the Promontory system, the deposit is split up among 10 institutions and therefore gets the full benefit of FDIC insurance. By the way, Promontory’s most well known founders are Eugene Ludwig (former Comptroller of the Currency) and Alan Blinder (former Vice Chairman of the Federal Reserve). This is a very legitimate and well known system for extending FDIC insurance. In fact, in today’s local paper where I live, the Sun Sentinel, there are ads from banks that are in the Promontory system touting the fact that they can offer deposit services for up to $50 million. Banks that don’t offer this coverage are doing it by choice and the Federal government doesn’t need to change the FDIC insurance limits to compensate for this decision.
There are public alternatives as well. As an example, savings banks in Massachusetts belong to the DIF insurance pool which insures all deposits (regardless of size) and acts as a supplement to FDIC insurance. DIF is state sponsored and has existed since 1934.
And, there are a wide range of additional solutions that large depositors can utilize if they want to keep their deposits at banks that they are concerned about. There is private credit protection that can be purchased and effectively supplements FDIC insurance. So, for a fee this issue of FDIC limits goes away. And, by the way, the banks that are weak and accepting deposits can arrange for private insurance and credit protection for their customers. They don’t need the Federal government to compensate for their decision not to purchase private insurance
Obama’s whole solution is worthless.

Posted by: geevill | September 30, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

If Libor rates really are at 6 7/8 like I heard on the car radio this morning, we’re screwed – probably already waited too long to avoid some real hardships in the short term.

Posted by: Paul | September 30, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Fannie and Freddie acted in response to Clinton administration pressure to boost homeownership rates among minorities and the poor. However compassionate the motive, the result of this systematic disregard for normal credit standards has been financial disaster.
ONE key pioneer of ACORN’s subprime-loan shakedown racket was Madeline Talbott – an activist with extensive ties to Barack Obama. She was also in on the ground floor of the disastrous turn in Fannie Mae’s mortgage policies.
Long the director of Chicago ACORN, Talbott is a specialist in “direct action” – organizers’ term for their militant tactics of intimidation and disruption. Perhaps her most famous stunt was leading a group of ACORN protesters breaking into a meeting of the Chicago City Council to push for a “living wage” law, shouting in defiance as she was arrested for mob action and disorderly conduct. But her real legacy may be her drive to push banks into making risky mortgage loans.

Posted by: HP Boston | September 30, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

Hey Geevill,
Just as worthless as McCain’s claim of victory yesterday morning and as worthless as Sarah Palin…LOL!

Posted by: The Truth | September 30, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

More than 200 former U.S. diplomats have signed a statement announcing their support for Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.
The former diplomats and ambassadors signed the statement before the Friday debate between Obama and Republican nominee John McCain.
“We are supporting Senator Barack Obama because of his judgment, experience, and ability to inspire people to come together around a common purpose,” the letter said. “Senator Obama’s talents offer an historic opportunity; for the sake of America’s security and standing in the world, we must seize it.”
The letter, signed by officials from both major political parties, said the foreign policies of the Bush administration have diminished America’s alliances abroad.

Posted by: beck | September 30, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Bush warns ? Lil Bush, Dubya, that mentral midget? He warned about the Iraq war also, how’s that working out for you ? Cost 1.5 trillion dollars, over 4000 dead.This is a scam and a money grab by Bush and his people before they lose power. I hear he plans to pardon all 20 million illegal aliens.
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | September 30, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

What does Ron Paul say? That is all that matters since he has been correct about all of this.

Posted by: Huh | September 30, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Bush and company are using every fear tactic they can to push through an economic recovery plan that would give them total control of the nation’s financial markets. Then, they have until January 10 to squeeze as much as they can out of the markets so they can leave the next President with a total disaster across the board (foreign relations, war in Iraq, global commerce, etc.). McCain is part of the Bush cabal. His chief financial advisor is Phil Gramm, the architect of the deregulation movement that is the root of the problem, and McCain as a member of the Keating 5, which brought down the savings and loan industry in the 1980s.
HP Boston tries to make you believe it’s the work of ACORN, a national community organizer association, so he can put the blame on OBama. But the truth is, the blame rests squarely on the Republican Party, which controlled Congress until 16 months ago, and the President.
Bush is nothing more than a modern day Nero, who watched Rome (Washington) burn as he played the fiddle. The last thing this country needs is McCain (and Palin, Leiberman, etc.) taking over and giving us four more years of the same.

Posted by: algwriter | September 30, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Let every over-extended American individual and business sink like a stone. HOW DARE ANYONE EVEN ASK ME FOR ONE MORE PENNY TO SUBSIDIZE THIS RECKLESS, GLUTTONOUS, INANE AND MONSTROUS BEHEMOTH OF A BAILOUT FOR CROOKS! In a competitive market where there are, by design, supposed to be winners and losers, let the losers lose. I don’t want to hear a peep from these pathetic swine, or their pimps, Bush, Pelosi et al. Let the losers go down in fglames. Its actually good for America for millions of credit-happy idiots to go down hard. Maybe the swinish OINKING instead of living will dissipate.

Posted by: Not one Penny | September 30, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Paul: yesterday we, the main street….we lost 1.5 Trillion dollars when the market closed… uhmmm.
Ya, I think we have not seen anything yet.

Posted by: beck | September 30, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Let me get this right. The republican president who has been the champion of deregulation along with his cronies in congress now want the tax payers to bail out these investment banks. Hmmm something stinks and I think it’s the GOP’s corpse. What happened to a free market? If your gonna live by it you die by it.

Posted by: Joe | September 30, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Not one Penny: the problem with your statement is 75% of America is made up of small business. If they can’t get the loans they need to run… Let’s put it this way… America will be out of work. Not sure what you do, or owns your business, but you could loose your job and not be able to get another one. See ya in the soup lines.

Posted by: beck | September 30, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Burn Baby Burn!
Bush has been lying and crying wolf so much that although it is quite serious, it would be much easier and much less if the government gave 500k to all Americans 21 and older that are not in prison or have been convicted of felonies. The requirement would be that 100k be placed in a bank for 6 mos. All credit cards will have to be paid completely off and if in mortgage foreclosure, 250k is required to be paid immediately.
It would be far easier to give the money to Americans who could directly help America by coming via the front door and not the back by going through the investment banks.
Let them bail themselves out, which is quite easy.

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Our wonderful leader warns us now? I mean seriously doesn’t he have boxes to start packing, mail to fwd on, and newspapers to cancel?!
He doesn’t care about the American people. he is trying to keep all his buddies safe. This bailout is not the ONLY way out of this mess. Why does the media and wall St have tunnel vision about this?!
This is the best thing congress has done in a long time. NOT RUSHED INTO a decision that is going to cost us more down the track LIKE THE WAR!
remember?!

Posted by: xenos | September 30, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

help Sarah Palin clean up Washington, visit http://www.sarahpalinhasaposse.com

Posted by: smartguy | September 30, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

The answer is to stop the regulation of our markets by the Federal Reserve. Greenspan has created a huge prosperity bubble based on massive debt. No bailout will make a difference. The monetary system of the last 3 decades is fundamentally unstable.

Posted by: Huh | September 30, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

It is hard to wrap ourselves around this crisis, but if we don’t we will be the ones out of jobs, no money to feed out children, no retirement, we will be living in government ran tent cities.
Yes, I agree, I do not want to bail out the market or the rich but we have no choice. We have to do it smart however, we have to have protection plans written in that will work. We also need to hurry. yesterday we lost 1.5 Trillion in 401K, Pension Plans.. etc. today we could loose even more. The rich, they will be fine, Hell they have millions to get thru this mess, we do not, we need to try this.

Posted by: beck | September 30, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

People KNOW that Obama (and democrats) played a major part in this current crisis, and how the democrats wanted 20% of the BAILOUT?RESCUE money to go to organizations like ACORN….Obama THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZER!!!

Posted by: HP Boston | September 30, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

beck – Why was 1.5 trillion lost. Surely if that invested money was placed in the market into companies with sound profits, the money would still be there. You are advocating more artificial stimulus based on inflation to prop up the market beyond where it should be. Sounds like a bad idea. We have squandered our wealth, and need our economy to contract to where it should be. This bailout will only buy us a few months. Listen to Ron Paul for some reason. look at charts of CPI, M1, M2, M3, value of dollar over time to convince yourself.

Posted by: Huh | September 30, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

The root cause of this problem is “global free trade”. The problems on Wall Street, Main Street, and the International Banking and Investment industries can all be traced back to 16 years of “Global Free Trade” and “De-Regulation” that made International Corporations and their CEO’s and stock investors very wealthy, while they dismantled and sold off the assets of American’s home town Industries. Mean while, when “We the people” lost our good jobs, we also lost our capacity to save for the future. As the years passed, we ran down our savings and then ran up our debt as we all pretended we were not falling further and further behind as each generation came of age. To help us to maintain our collective delusion of wealth, Washington (Democrats & Republicans) used the Federal Reserve, and De-Regulation to push down interest rates, and removed restrictions on mortgages and credit card debt. By these means, they wanted to entice us to live in a fantasy of artificial wealth. They deliberately put in place, policies that would inflate home values to create artificial equity from which we could borrow even more, as we went further and further into net debt! We did not realize it, but we were “deceived” into far deeper debt! We were told “Not to worry, if you cannot afford this home in a year, you will be able to sell it for a profit”! And so without even realizing it, many were deceived into catastrophic debt from which they had no escape! While it lasted for the last 6 years, it all felt so REAL! But it was as much of a fantasy as that of the Discover Card commercial where the black and white Main Street suddenly became a color Carnival when “Discover” came to town. It was also as much of a lie, as that told by the Credit Card commercial where a young, newly married couple looks adoringly at their new credit card as she exclaims; “I finally got the CREDIT I deserve!” Yes right, “come into my parlor said the spider to the fly”! When a family is living beyond its means on debt, it will only fell good until they hit their limit! Then reality hits, when the free money stops, and the banks say “NO MORE, ITS TIME TO PAY US BACK!” Well America, that day has come for America! But now Washington says NO, lets borrow $700B from the bank across the ocean in CHINA, they can keep our national life style going! But America, mark my words; they are only buying themselves time! This is not the Bankruptcy of a person, or a family, or even a state government. No my friends, this is the bankruptcy of AMERICA! “We the people” did not do this to ourselves! Washington and its Republicans and Democrats alike did this to us! America, tell Washington, no bail out, until they replace global free trade, with global “FAIR and BALANCED” trade! And lastly my friends, when your electricity is turned off in a few months, listen to the silence! That silence will be the sound you hear when the “Sucking Sound” stops! That “Sucking Sound” is from that same vacuum that Ross Perot warned us about so many years ago. This will end when that vacuum is finally turned off! But they will not turn it off until all of our wealth is gone! Then the next sound you will hear will be weeks later, when the hungry mob comes. And hungry mob will come, and they will be intent on having you and your family, OVER FOR DINNER!

Posted by: nh pragmatist | September 30, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Bush has nothing less but his legacy. I doubt he would want to pile on to the deficit if things did not look really bad. Many in this Congress will and should be voted out in November. McCain has not worked tirelessly on this issue as he grandstanded last week. His comments yesterday tepidly supported the bailout, but only after the market dove 777 points. It’s time to fire the Republicans.

Posted by: you're fired | September 30, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Awwww, look and listen to Bush Chicken Little. Dire straights??? The economic damage will be painful and lasting???
Just over a couple of months ago, you said the fundamentals of the economy were strong. A month ago, your flunkie McChicken said the same thing? What happened? Protecting your Wall Street buddies, huh?
Well, I got news for you.
BURN BABY BURN.
Wanna save this economy? Give 1 million to every American 21 and over with no felonies and that aren’t in prison. Far cheaper and would solve the problem right along with providing an economic boom for the country 5 years minimum.

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

People KNOW that Obama (and democrats) played a major part in this current crisis, and how the democrats wanted 20% of the BAILOUT?RESCUE money to go to organizations like ACORN….Obama THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZER!!!
GOT THAT FOLKS 20% of 700 BILLION IS HOW MUCH??? 20% of 700 TRILLION IS HOW MUCH?? Can you fathom these staggering amounts???

Posted by: HP Boston | September 30, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

hug: not my words. Came from the experts they interviewed yesterday when the market dropped.
When that market closed at 777 points, we lost.
Not sure about you but my 401K is market based….

Posted by: beck | September 30, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

HPChicken,
70% of American doesn’t support this bailout. This isn’t a Repug or Dem issue. It’s an American issue.
As usual, you prefer to be bent over by Bush and stroked. I heard you saying “More Daddy, More!”
The rest of us like seeing Bush without his supply of Viagra. Quite impotent, isn’t he? JUST LIKE MCCCAIN.
In case you forgot, the inevitable holds true.
POTUS OBAMA – IT’S A LOCK

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Awwww, look and listen to Bush Chicken Little. Dire straights??? The economic damage will be painful and lasting???
Just over a couple of months ago, you said the fundamentals of the economy were strong. A month ago, your flunkie McChicken said the same thing? What happened? Protecting your Wall Street buddies, huh?
Well, I got news for you.
BURN BABY BURN.
Want save this economy? First, STICK EM UP! You’re being robbed now!
Give 1 million to every American 21 and over with no felony convictions and aren’t in prison. It would be far cheaper than 700B, and would solve the problem right along with providing an economic boom for the country 5 years minimum.

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

GEORGE W. BUSH…….
The man who cried wolf so much that when wolves actually showed, no one paid attention to him.
BURN BABY BURN. In hell, that is.

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

I just read a comment on RCP and the ACORN “donation” may not have been taken out of the Bailout Bill, only the percentages. Here’s the comment:
“The set-aside for ACORN was NOT removed from the revised bill that was rejected. The name and % were removed, but the support was not:
Sec 103: (6) providing financial assistance to financial
21 institutions, including those serving low- and mod
22erate-income populations and other underserved
23 communities, and that have assets less than
24 $1,000,000,000, that were well or adequately cap25
italized as of June 30, 2008.”
Just like Prego “It’s In There”!!!

Posted by: HP Boston | September 30, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

HP Boston, so it’s in the bill, but not by name. give me a break!

Posted by: whatevah | September 30, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

“Bush Warns Economic Damage Could Be ‘Painful and Lasting’” HUH? WHAT? Isn’t this the guy who said that deregulation was better? Does anyone still listen to this guy anyway? He’s useless.

Posted by: Homeowner | September 30, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Doesn’t bush remind you of those TV reporters that stand in the middle of a hurricane with the wind blowing, the rain coming sideways, and they say it looks like it’s going to be a Nasty one…

Posted by: pt | September 30, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

What does Bush gain from this bailout? He’s adding lots of money to the deficit. I really feel he does not want the economy’s complete failure to be his legacy. Nobody wants to be Hoover II.
The fact that the Republicans do not have the leadership pull over their own rank and file members speaks volumes. McCain has not been able to lead in this situation with his own party, forget the other side of the aisle. Say what you want about the Dems, but at least 2/3 stepped up to passed a bill sent by a Republican President that they dislike very much.

Posted by: election first | September 30, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

This is quite simple.
Never have politicians been more accountable to their constituencies than NOW.
Election day is just around the corner for most in the House. If you look at the voting, those who voted no HAD TO because the voters in their areas SAID NO!
VOTE FOR THE BAILOUT, errrrrr RESCUE (by John McCain) and your political career is OVER!

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Are the $25B to automakers for retooling still in the bill? How about the billions to the oil companies so they can drill of the Pacific and Atlantc shores?
There are a lot of ‘hidden’ agenda items in this bill….besides Pelosi can’t keep her trap shut long enouch to think about the country…she’s too busy trying to ram Hussein down our throat.

Posted by: Evelyn | September 30, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Don’t worry, McCain, who said himself, he is not an expert on the economy, will help fix the problem…
I have heard enough of the republicans for two terms, goodbye morons!!!!

Posted by: matt | September 30, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

I heard one analyst on tv yesterday say “we need to pass a bill, so the economy can recover and Americans can live the life they want to live” I thought “the life they want to live”…isn’t that what started this problem, maybe Americans should start living the life they can AFFORD to live.

Posted by: samhiguchi | September 30, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

This is quite simple.
Never have politicians been more accountable to their constituencies than NOW.
Election day is just around the corner for most in the House. If you look at the voting, those who voted no HAD TO because the voters in their areas SAID NO! The Repugs are caught between a rock and a democrat. They’ve abandoned Bush and are now in “Every man for himself” mode. SAVE YOURSELVES!!!
VOTE FOR THE BAILOUT, errrrrr RESCUE (by John McCain) and your political career is OVER!

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

Like Donald Trump said and he is a very smart man, WHY do we have to buy the failed mortgages? THOSE that have already failed are FAILURES, buying them out is not going to change that! I am SICK and TIRED of OBAMA not TAKING a position and only referring to this in his stump speeches, and again I heard he will ONLY vote PRESENT? WTF? WE will have a President that can not take a stance? Then McCain gets castigated for doing his job as a Senator! HOW DARE these PEOPLE! AND CHRIS DODD and NANCY PELOSI make me wanna hurl! SHE is an utter FOOL! HOW did they EXPECT MCCAIN to MAKE the REPUBLICANS vote like he wanted anymore than OBAMA could make the DEMOCRATS VOTE like him, except he is gonna vote PRESENT! I am sick of the division caused by the Democrats I thought they were the PARTY of UNITY? THIS is a DISGRACE, now I KNOW why BILL CLINTON keeps tooting McCain’s horn!

Posted by: HP Boston | September 30, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Row, row, row your boat gently down defeat.
Merrilly, merrily merrilly LIFE WITHOUT McCheat.
Cynics continue to WHINE.
Obama continues to WIN

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

What crisis next….voter fraud…wonder what role Acorn will play in that?

Posted by: mfmros | September 30, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Looks like the electoral college is moving towards Obama. McCain is down 27 electoral votes from yesterday.

Posted by: zz | September 30, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

who is leading the republicans right now? this is ridiculous.

Posted by: drivers wanted | September 30, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Bailout is the correct financial term. Rescue is the political term used when you are trying to shove it down the American People’s throat.

Posted by: Friartuck | September 30, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

ACORN conspiracy fans, I think people are focused on the economy at the moment. The reason McCain is losing ground daily is because his advocates wanna play in the gutter rather than discuss the issues…ya know, the economy, the war, the rising energy prices. I’m sure we can have a discussion of who knows worse people after the real issues are under control.

Posted by: Issues Not Smears | September 30, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am

How about wiping out part of every American’s credit card debt? or instituting a temporary freeze on late fees?

Posted by: geevill | September 30, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

McCain thinks he driving.
You might want to clear the sidewalks.
Geriatric Behind the Wheel!!!

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

do you hear that big sucking noise, that’s the vacuum created by the lack of republican leadership. nobody is leading this party, they just point the blame on the dems. this bailout plan is proposed by the republican president and his administration and has been voted down by the republicans in congress, but somehow obama and pelosi are the problem? the problem is the republicans have no leader, mccain isn’t even mentioned when the republican congress speaks. just sayin’.

Posted by: Hoover | September 30, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Looks like Obama will be the next pres…soooo with that said after Jan 29th it is now Obama’s fault the economny is in the tank as he will have the Senate and House to give him carte blanche to do as he pleases to fix this mess (no excuses.)..Me, I will have the satisfaction of saying for the next four years “Hey I didn’t vote for him.” Think I’ll get started early by saying IMPEACH PRES OBAMA….

Posted by: checks and balances | September 30, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Painful and lasting,
Kinda’ like eight years of the Decider.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 30, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

BLAME THE FOUR MUSKETERRS:PELOSI, DODD, REID & FRANK:
“WE HAD IT ALL UNDER CONTROL AND DIDNT NEED MCCAIN TO COME PARACHUTING IN HERE AND RUINING IT ALL . . .”
APPARENTLY, THE CLOWNS NEVER HAD ANYTHING UNDER CONTROL..
MCCAIN MAY ACTUALLY HAVE TO PARACHUTE IN AND RESCUE THE RESCUING MUSKETEERS..
WHERE IS THE MESSIAH?
WHERE IS THE MESSIAH?
I FORGOT, HE ALREADY VOTEED “PRESENT”
THE MESSAIH IS WATCHING THE POLLS AND MAKING SPEECHES WHILE THE MESS HE PART CREATED IS SINKING THE NATION..
OBAMA, THIS IS WHAT YOU GET FOR 1 BILLION IN EARMARKS AND COBODING WITH FANNIE MAE ‘N ACORN..

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | September 30, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

checks and balances, people who think like you are the problem with this country. you’ll vote for the country first guy, but hope the country fails if he doesn’t win.

Posted by: grow up | September 30, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Huh, ‘Why was 1.5 trillion lost. Surely if that invested money was placed in the market into companies with sound profits, the money would still be there.’
The money was lost because investors expected Congress to act and they didn’t–it had nothing to do with companies or their profits, it was about the potential avaiability of credit to business–credit that is drying up!

Posted by: StLouisMan | September 30, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

checks and balances,
You have the honor of the first capitulation,
Yeah, he may have inherited a one term presidency. But he probably has more courage than the people who set him up.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 30, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

It’s too bad people on these forums can’t see beyond their own “party line” stances and stop the insults and name-calling.
I don’t agree with everything Sarah Palin says and does (or McCain either, for that matter), and I’m quickly becoming concerned about Barack Obama. I was a Hillary Clinton supporter who endured being called a racist because I refused to support Obama, and I hesitantly backed him after her withdrawal from the race. Never in all that time did I call Obama or any other candidate a name, used his middle name as a weapon or any of that, even when being slammed by his supporters during the primaries. How many of you can say the same?
While Democrats point at Bush and the Republicans and blame everything on them (and Republicans, as well), maybe a look at a fact – the approval ratings of these politicians – is in order. Bush – Approve-30.4%; Disapprove-65.8%; Congress – Approve-17.8%; Disapprove-73.8%. It is clear while Bush’s ratings are in the toilet, Congress’ ratings have already been flushed. That includes the majority Democratic Congress.
ENOUGH of the blame game – from both sides. I am sick of being part of a system that elects self-serving politicians who don’t care about our country or us and who put their party ahead of what’s best for the United States of America. That extends down to the supporters – and this is in both parties, as well – who can’t for one minute stop calling people names, saying candidates are “stupid,” taking their names and putting insulting twists on them (McSame, McInsane, etc.). Can you people really not see how hateful and spiteful you sound? I really wonder how we appear to the international community.
People who act in this way have taken our Constitution and jumped up and down on it – so much for “free speech,” huh? I will say one thing – Obama, from the start, said he was different, that he represented change. I was willing to take that on face value. However, the events of the last several days make me have to ask: Is this the change he was talking about? If so, we are really, really in trouble, and that’s why I’ve become an Independent because I really don’t want to be associated with ANYONE who acts as many of these politicians and many of you bloggers have acted.

Posted by: ENOUGH! | September 30, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

The economic damage inflicted in this country due to the greed of some, including those in the administration, is already painful and lasting. Why should “WE, THE PEOPLE” bail out those who are the culprits? Let them reach into their long pockets, which are well-lined with money stolen from many, and solve their situation. If we are going down, let them go down all the way to the bottom with the rest of us. It is shameful that this president and his cronies are turning this great nation into just another “banana republic” much like those they so criticize south of the border. Housing owned by “the estate”? What’s next? A summit with Castro and Chavez to get their imput? This scares me more than the market losing a few hundred points!!!!WAKE UP!
And, by the way, there is no “credit crunch” – banks have money to lend, just as long as you are considered a good credit risk.

Posted by: Ada Rodriguez | September 30, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Instead of doing things a** backwards by giving 700B to crooks, give 500k to each American 21 and over who hasn’t been convicted of a felony and are not in prison.
Receiving the money would require you pay off all debt including school loans, cars, credit cards, etc.
Secondly, 50k has to be placed in the bank and cannot be used for 1 year.
Problem solved. Americans aren’t sufferering, economy is in a boom, the credit problem is solved.
WAAAAAAAAAY CHEAPER THAN 700B.

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

That’s rich.
Every time he makes one of these statements, you can SEE it on his face that he has NO idea what he’s talking about.
“The economy is made up of interlinks” is a Bush quote I’ll always remember.

Posted by: Chicka | September 30, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Of course the damage will be painful and long lasting! Eight years of Bush to completely tear the economy to shreds and now the country is looking to McSame, he who claims he knows naught about the economy, to lead us to where else, but damnation!! Other republicans are running away as fast and as far as they can from any connection to Bush, yet McSame, who supported Bush over 90% of the time, is tied to Bush, is still being considered to replace him. How can anyone be so blind as to be unable to see that this would only end in a road to disaster, backed by an even more “unknowledgeable” disciple, Palin! If we are determined to bury ourselves in an ever-sinking ship, we have no one to blame but ourselves for supporting Bush, McCain and Palin.

Posted by: Karen | September 30, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Suck it up leonard and grow up(?) that will be the menu of the day for the next 4 years..so how does it taste???? You libs have been dishing it out to repubs for the last 8 years… You know what they say about revenge is a dish served best cold…IMPEACH NAN/HARRY/OBAMA

Posted by: checks and balances | September 30, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Who’s actually being served here?
Looks like George Bush and McChicken.
Being outsourced is best served cold with warm buttermilk.
POTUS OBAMA – IT’S A LOCK

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 30, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

checks and balances, you hope you see the next administration fail if it isn’t McCain? that’s called cutting off your nose to spite your face. your logic has some holes.

Posted by: grow up | September 30, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

First and foremost I trust The Bush administration as much as I trust a my crackhead Uncle
to pay me back the money he borrowed from me 3 months ago. If memory serves me correct did’nt
he give us the same “the sky is falling” rhetoric about Iraq’s alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction back
in 2002-2003. I also dont trust The McCain/Palin ticket either for obvious reasons but mainly because John McCain’s
chief financial advisor is Phil Gramm, the architect of the deregulation movement that is the root of this problem
and furthermore John McCain was a member of the Keating 5, which brought down the S & L industry in the
1980s. I dont even have to mention Sarah Palin, we all seen her interviews with Charlie Gidson and Katie Couric.
I would have to be the village idiot with brain damage to think she’s capable of being a heartbeat away from being
POTUS after she defended her foriegn policy experience on her proximity to Russia…………WTF?
I say the hell with the bailout, why not bail-out Americans thats struggling to make ends meet in this ecomony.
Why cant the millionaires/billionaies in the banking industry bail themselves out. Why not have the CEO’s
of these corporations and there multi-million dollar severance packages bail us out.

Posted by: WTF | September 30, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Bush is an absolutely clueless idiot! he and his dimwits have gotten us into this mess and now he wants the taxpayers to bail out all his rich buddies. Forget it! And McCain/Palin are two more nitwit idiots who have no clue. God help America if these two mental midgets get elected!

Posted by: Reality Bites | September 30, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Vote No, to the $700 Billion bailout! Only person’s the bailout will help is the Rich, and the Republicans!

Posted by: Demo Rules | September 30, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

grow-up…literally…Other than the fact the freshman senator obama is a great motivational speaker..what does he offer in the way of experience and executive knowledge to get this country on track again??? Don’t spew spin..give me policy experience…what economic policies has he SPONSORED NOT CO-SPONSORED….What budgets has he created and signed….what heads of state has he negotiated with…or even visited more that once….

Posted by: checks and balances | September 30, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

It will be painful and lasting because we have squandered our wealth. Greenspan’s policies over the last several decades have destroyed our currency and built up the illusion of prosperity on a mountain of debt. The free markets have been regulated by the Federal Reserve. This regulation must end now. Obama and McCain are both barking up the wrong trees. the problem is the Keynesian monetary system.

Posted by: Huh | September 30, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Was it not Obama who wants the economy of the Government to rid on wall street and investments?
I hope the people realize how foolish that idea is now.
The Govenment should go back to backing out money with gold, then we would not be in this position.
The bail out deal had so much tagged on to it. and many aspects of it were not clear and explained to the American people well enough to back it.
I think all information needs to be made public about this deal and in understandable terms by the American Citizens.
Who, what and why, The people involved, The assests the debts who gains and who loses. The property this company owns. Who the stock holders are and what say so they have in this. Who gains by it.
Why did they tag other things to this bill and who did that. What would they gain? Should they even be tagged on to this?
How the Government and the People will gain from this, if possible losses who will sustain that.
Will the CEO’s gain financially from this. if so why is bad judgement being paid off. Who are they and what are they gaining.
Is their any political party associated with this pro or con of the company?
We the people want the transparancy made public on this.
How can the American Citizen protect their interest Through all this.

Posted by: seah | September 30, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

who is leading the republicans on this issue? it’s a republican bill, voted down by republicans.

Posted by: leaders? | September 30, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Vote No, to the $700 Billion bailout! Only person’s the bailout will help is the Rich, and the Republicans

Posted by: Vote No | September 30, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Painful and lasting – sounds like the last 8 years under his leadership.
What a shame we don’t have a Clinton on the ballot to come in and clean up this mess.

Posted by: ch | September 30, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Painful and lasting – sounds like the last 8 years under his leadership.
What a shame we don’t have a Clinton on the ballot to come in and clean up this mess.

Posted by: ch | September 30, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

In John McCain, we see the character and leadership of a President. He went back to Washington, did his best to bring the parties together on the bail out, got behind Republicans to vote for the bailout. What happened is that Pelosi started spouting hatred toward the GOP and they refuted their support. Now, we have this idiot, Obama, trying to capitalize on the failure of the bailout for political gains. Obama needs to go back to Chicago…AMERICA DOES NOT WANT OBAMA, THE IDIOT!

Posted by: Obama=Pelosi=Losers | September 30, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Suspending the mark-to-market rule would allow banks and accountants to revalue their assets based on more sound criteria than the euphoria or panic that pervades the floor of the New York Stock Exchange minute-by-minute. Sub-prime mortgages will likely have much higher values if considered in a longer-term perspective — such as hold-to-maturity. I believe that the vast majority of mortgages will perform in the long term.
Presto. Up goes assets; up goes capital; banks can make loans again. Cash infusions may still be required, but this will buy us enough time to seriously examine what steps need to be taken to get runaways like Fannie and Freddie under control, how to renegotiate rates with distressed borrowers who really can handle a mortgage, and how to keep this from happening again. Can this be done? If we can approve 700 billion, surely we can do this and keep our money.
Jim H. Ainsworth-former CPA, CFP, CLU, Registered Investment Advisor, Licensed Securities Principal

Posted by: deanbob | September 30, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

leaders??? That’s easy..the house majority polosi and senate majority reid..they had the majority vote so why didn’t it go through…the time for blaming the repubs is passed, specifically two years ago, and more than likely, the pres as well since obama will surely get it…so are the dems going to spend the next 4 years now blaming the minority gop for the dems screw-ups if so…why vote dem at all why not just stick to repub pres so that the dems will have him to blame…MAYBE OBAMA SHOULD TAKE HIS WIN AND DEMAND A RE-COUNT OF VOTES

Posted by: checks and balances | September 30, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

checks and balances, 2/3 of democrats voted with a republican president. Only 1/3 of republicans voted with the republican president. the republicans in congress are not taking the advice of their own administration nor the nomination to their own party.

Posted by: leaders? | September 30, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

I want my president to be decisive and to have a good judgment.
I want my president to say “God bless America” not be a follower and surrogate of a hateful pastor who declares “God damn America” from the pulpit.
I want my president to respect small town people like me who happen to be religious.
I want my president to have a spouse who has always been proud of being an American (not just because her husband became a presidential candidate).
I want a president who can make me a proud American and not one who keeps telling me that the glory days of my beloved country are over.
I want a president who tells me that the fundamentals of American greatness are still solid.
I want a president who can stand with the motto: “My country! right or Wrong!”
I want a president who will never belittle America and the American people when he is with foreigner leaders and people.
I am a proud democrat and will always be one. However, what my party leadership did in the primaries is inexcusable. The careless Democratic party leaders pushed Senator Hillary Clinton, the one with a certain chance to defeat McCain, out of the race.
Above my being a democrat, I am a proud American. Therefore, on November 4, I will be crossing party lines and vote for Senator John McCain. McCain at least has the experience and the record to be a great president. His personal story and achievements make me proud of my country.
That’s the kind of president I want.
McCain 2008. Hillary 2012.

Posted by: Roger | September 30, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Notice how Bush worded it with”could be”. Translation: If Obama gets in, the economic disaster will get more painful and last throughout his term.
Raising taxes and socialist programs=disaster like we’ve never seen before.

Posted by: S Adams | September 30, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Notice how Bush worded it with”could be”. Translation: If Obama gets in, the economic disaster will get more painful and last throughout his term.
Raising taxes and socialist programs=disaster like we’ve never seen before.

Posted by: S Adams | September 30, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Everyone has had it with Bush and his war in Iraq, so they are turning to a liberal who is inexperienced, pushing socialist positions and neck deep in controversy.
Remember, everyone was fed up with Nixon so they turned to Jimmy Carter.
Let’s not cut off our nose to spite our face, McCain may not be the perfect candidate either, but he is much safer than Obama.

Posted by: S Adams | September 30, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Hollywood is turning communist. They are having children sing a song, more like a chant, about Obama and making a video.
Can someone say North Korea, communist?!
Very scary stuff.

Posted by: S Adams | September 30, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

leaders….blah blah blah Not really going to “change” with the dems in control either is it??? Just the same ole blame game dems accusing the repubs even though they hold the majority…added a dem pres going to make it worst…..polosi and reid could not rally the dems together to vote this in when they clearly had the votes on their side..no amount of dem spin is going to change that fact….thank goodness the repubs did not vote for it..free market prevails and the world did not end as predicted……..

Posted by: checks and balances | September 30, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years. The first six the economy was fine.
Almost two years ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%.
4) the DOW JONES hit a record high–14,000 +
5) American’s were buying new cars, taking cruises,
vacations overseas, living large!…
But American’s wanted ‘CHANGE’! So, in 2006 they voted in a
Democratic Congress and yes–we got ‘CHANGE’ all right. In the PAST YEAR:
1) Consumer confidence has plummeted ;
2) Gasoline is now over $4 a gallon & climbing!;
3) Unemployment is up to 5.5% (a 10% increase);
4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION
DOLLARS and prices still dropping;
5) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure.
$2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS HAS EVAPORATED FROM THEIR
STOCKS, BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS!
YES, IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE…AND WE SURE GOT IT! ….
REMEMBER THE PRESIDENT HAS NO CONTROL OVER ANY OF THESE ISSUES, ONLY CONGRESS.
AND WHAT HAS CONGRESS DONE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
NOW THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO REALLY
GIVE US CHANGE ALONG WITH A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!!
JUST HOW MUCH MORE ‘CHANGE’ DO YOU THINK YOU CAN STAND?

Posted by: Maryland Woman | September 30, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Here is what Bushies legacy would be:
1) Lied to go to war with Iraq which killed over 4K Americans and over 30K wounded. Not to mention, over 600BB spent in tax payers money.
2) Hired corrupt Cheney as his VP
3) Dumb
4) Liar
5) Response to Katrina
6) Cronyism and corruption to the max
7) Wall street, housing and financial crisis
8) No respect for America in the world
9) Increasing gap between rich and poor in the US with tax cut to the rich
10) Bridge to nowhere and other fiscal spending to the roof.
May I go on??? I have about 90 more of his failed policy.

Posted by: KC | September 30, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

President Bush must have been brainwashed by Paulson.
He is still parroting the same scare and threatening lie that hasty and immediate passage of the “PAULSON BAILOUT” is the only option available to Congress to avoid this “long and painful recession crap”.
A lying crap because Paulson have not given any specific facts or data to support his lie to Congress about this recession scary effect.
Luckily for us, the majority House representatives in Congress yesterday did not believe and doubted the “Paulson Lie” and they magnanimously thwarted the brainwashed Congress representatives who voted for the passage of the “PAULSON BAILOUT” House bill.
PAULSON BAILOUT really is the better appropriate name for the bill.
WHY? Because this PAULSON BAILOUT was primarily designed to rescue the Wall Street financial companies and investment banks where his elite friends; former elite associates; former elite fellow officers with huge salaries and bonuses works.
More to the point this will protect and enhanced the value of Paulson and/or family’s shareholdings in Goldman Sachs and/or other WS banks. Paulson have more than $632.4 Millions worth of stocks and options in Goldman Sachs at the time of his appointment as Secretary of Treasury on July 10, 2006

Posted by: Zee P Bee | September 30, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Still undecided? Let me give you a simple help: If you trust Bush and are willing to pay for the Wall Street bailout bill through your taxes, then vote “YES”. Otherwise, if you do not trust Bush, and do not want to bailout Wall street through you and your children taxes, then vote “NO”. After you have decided, send an email or call your representative to voice out your feeling. I have marked down those representatives who voted last session against my voice. They will not be getting my votes this November.

Posted by: Sutter197 | September 30, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

S Adams | Sep 30, 2008 1:53:44 PM Is it more impiortant to feel,look and sound good than to be good (emotion vs reason)?

Posted by: deanbob | September 30, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Still undecided? Let me give you a simple help: If you trust Bush and are willing to pay for the Wall Street bailout bill through your taxes, then vote “YES”. Otherwise, if you do not trust Bush, and do not want to bailout Wall street through you and your children taxes, then vote “NO”. After you have decided, send an email or call your representative to voice out your feeling. I have marked down those representatives who voted last session against my voice. They will not be getting my votes this November.

Posted by: Sutter197 | September 30, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Bush, his followers, and ANYONE who voted for the Bailout on Monday need to be either voted or removed from office, post-haste. The people have spoken: NO BAILOUT, PERIOD!!!!

Posted by: Ladywolf | September 30, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Maybe if people didn’t scap goat and choose the favorites this would have never happened. Painful can’t be more painful what my life is been past 15 years same of the same all around me.
Rude people all over this world

Posted by: Gene | September 30, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

McCain did have much foreign affair experience because he has been in the House for 26 years. But it does not really mean anything good for the American when his view is stubborn and his attitude is provocative. As regards to economy, he has almost nothing, similar to his knowledge on our constitutional law. Obama represent the life force of our new American society. He will certainly bring us hope and reform. The most important thing is he listen to the voice of the people. His attitude is trustworthy and with him we can have a new prosperous era.

Posted by: Sutter197 | September 30, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

This whole Wall Street thing is a scam! The Dow is up so is Nasdaq..the bankers are waiting for a bailout..why use their money when they can get ours…again!!! If this situation was so dire…EVERYBODY would be working on the Hill today! The Lobbyist are waiting for their “fair share” too! What a rotten thing to do to taxpayers…tell your reps to let the market correct itself and if businesses fail…they were not that solvent to begin with…after that is all over…get Pelosi, Frank, Dodd and the rest of those crooks out of Washington…jail Barney Frank, Dodd and any other person responsible for this debacle! NO BAILOUT!!!!

Posted by: mfmros | September 30, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

I’m no Bush fan but — it’s a fact that he warned of disaster if Fannie & Freddie weren’t reigned in, and his warnings were ignored. Same as John McCain’s warnings were ignored. Both by the Dems. The Dems cater to the poor because they always get their votes – and the rest of us always pay the bills.
It’s kind of like that fairy tale where Obama says he’ll cut taxes on 95% of us – and 40% of us don’t pay any taxes. But that doesn’t bother the Dems. That’s why non-taxpayers each got a $600 rebate, just like those of us who actually paid taxes to qualify for a rebate.

Posted by: marylou | September 30, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

An economic downturn will happen whether or not a bailout happens.
And can anyone really believe this crap? Weren’t the stimulus checks supposed to kick start the economy? How’d that work out?
A painful economic downturn? Probably.
A lasting one? Nope. What goes down eventually does go back up.
More fear mongering from the idiots in DC.
Stay calm. Don’t buy the hype.

Posted by: Fed Up With Them All | September 30, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Someone up there asked what Ron Paul had to say about the bailout. Here’s part of what he said when he appeared on CNN’s Late Edition (found at LA times):
PAUL: Well, I think that’s a mistake because we don’t have the money. But that doesn’t mean you have to do nothing. I mean, we could reform the system. We could return to sound money. We could balance our budget. We could change our foreign policy. We could take care of our people at home. We could lower taxes.
There’s a lot of things that we can do. But the worst thing that we can do is perpetuate the bad policies that gave us this trouble in the first place, and that is that we no longer, over the last quite a few decades, believed in free-market capitalism. Capital is supposed to come from savings. We’re supposed to work hard and save.
As a matter of fact, the Chinese work hard, right now, and they save, and they’re buying up the world. But we borrow and spend and consume, and now it’s caught up to us and it’s undermining our whole system. … So this $700 billion is not going to do it. “

Posted by: Fed Up With Them All | September 30, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Heres some more of what Ron Paul said:
“This is Wall Street in big trouble and sucking in Main Street, now, and dumping all the bills on Main Street. … And you can’t solve the problem of inflation, which is the creation of money and credit out of thin air, by more money and credit out of thin air, and not changing policy. We have to change basic policy.
“Yes, it would be painful, but it wouldn’t last so long. What they’re doing now, they’re propping up a failed system so the agony lasts longer. They’re doing exactly what we did in the Depression.”
“So, yes, there are going to be losses, but everybody lived beyond their means when the prices of houses were going up. Nobody cared about it. They kept borrowing against it. Oh, yes, that was fine and dandy. Everybody was making money, and the owner of the home kept borrowing and living beyond their means. Now they have to live beneath their means.
“What the government is doing now — and this new program is trying to prop up prices. You want the price structure to adjust. You want the price of houses to go down. You don’t want to fix the price of housing. You can’t price-fix. We’ve had too much of that.
“We need a market economy. We need to believe in ourselves. We need to believe and understand how the economy got us — how the government got us into this mess. And believe me, it wouldn’t be that tough. It would be a bad year. But, this way, it’s going to be a bad decade.”
KEY parts of the statement:
What they’re doing now, they’re propping up a failed system so the agony lasts longer. They’re doing exactly what we did in the Depression.”
“We need a market economy. We need to believe in ourselves. We need to believe and understand how the economy got us — how the government got us into this mess.
It would be a bad year. But, this way [referring to the bailout bill], it’s going to be a bad decade.”
Ron Paul understands economics, he understands how markets operate. This man KNOWS what he is talking about. We should all be listening to him.

Posted by: Fed Up With Them All | September 30, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

This was the saddest thing I’ve seen in a long time.

Posted by: BaxterJ | September 30, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Let’s play ‘Taps’ now while we still can enjoy. And, oh Mr Bush, thanks for everything!

Posted by: john b | October 1, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am

Why isn’t anyone wondering why it really wasn’t all that long ago that our lying president said our country is doing just fine economically???? IMPEACH or ARREST THE CRIMINAL BAST**D!

Posted by: Peacevine | October 21, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.