Sep 17, 2008 6:55pm

Clinton Fundraiser Endorses McCain in ‘Personal’ Decision

ABC News’ Hope Ditto Reports: Top Hillary Clinton fundraiser and member of the Democratic National Committee’s Platform Committee Lynn Forester de Rothschild endorsed Republican presidential nominee John McCain on Wednesday.

Speaking to members of the media at the Capitol Hill Club, Rothschild denied that Clinton had any influence over her endorsement decision, stating that the two have not spoken since before the Democratic National Convention in August. Rothschild said her endorsement decision was a personal one and one that came after consideration of the vice presidential picks and convention performances.

"I really think that they [McCain and Palin] will bring the bold, bipartisan, centrist change we need in Washington," said Rothschild.

Rothschild went on to cite specifically McCain’s record in the Senate as a primary influence in her decision. She said in such an important election, where economic and foreign policy issues are on the forefront, she considers McCain the best choice.

"John McCain will look for the best solutions to America’s problems. He is not an ideologue and he is not beholden to special interests."

Rothschild said she hopes her decision to publicly endorse McCain will give like-minded Democrats the confidence to follow suit.

Though Rothschild said she has not yet met Sarah Palin, she "thinks she is pretty cool," and wants to see a woman in the White House this election cycle. And Rothschild says that Palin’s conservative beliefs don’t concern her.

"I am pro-choice and I am sick and tired of Democratic party using the choice issue using it as a noose around womens’ necks," Rothschild said. "Bush has been president for eight and we still have every right to choose what we do to our bodies."

While the announcement may raise eyebrows, those following Rothschild through the course of the primary are less than shocked by her deference. While still working on Clinton’s behalf, Rothschild said of Obama to CNN in July, "frankly I don’t like him. I feel like he is an elitist. I feel like he has not given me reason to trust him."

During her tenure as a Clinton fundraiser, Rothschild brought in more than $100,000 for the campaign. A lifelong Democrat, Rothschild served on the DNC’s Platform Committee, a position she said on Wednesday that she will now abdicate.

Still, her party loyalty is not lost. Quoting Reagan, Rothschild mimed, "I didn’t leave the Democratic party, the Democratic party left me."

And, she is still maintaining some of her liberal mentality. When asked if McCain really invented the Blackberry, Rothschild retorted without hesitation, "No, that was Al Gore."

User Comments

No one cares about this woman. She speaks for only an elite minority who want attention. That’s a fair assumption…
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | September 17, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Lynn who…?
Obama is raising more money. He doesnt need her money. When asked by CNN why he`s not supporting Obama she said:
`I dont like him…..He`s elitist`.
And guess what shes married to SIR Forrester De Rothchild and they are worth billions of dollars. The true definition of elistist.

Posted by: krista | September 17, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

And who is Lynn De Elitist. Change is coming. Get used to it.
Obama 08

Posted by: keith | September 17, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

“I didn’t leave the Democratic party, the Democratic party left me.”
That pretty much sums it up.

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

I honestly think that this has no impact and it would take too much of my time to get into this person’s head to figure out why this was done.
The following comment seems to indicate detachment from the appointment of judges who have a narrow view of their role and that of government along with the need to respect employee investment rights.
Future appointees will erode the judiciary even more–for example a judicial ruling in December made it possible for GM to abrogate its agreements with retirees and their pensions all while we continue to bailout the well to do.
“I am pro-choice and I am sick and tired of Democratic party using the choice issue using it as a noose around womens’ necks,” Rothschild said. “Bush has been president for eight and we still have every right to choose what we do to our bodies.”

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 17, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Rothschild said of Obama to CNN in July, “frankly I don’t like him. I feel like he is an elitist.
Codeword for “He is black, and I can’t tolerate a black man being president.
Enough said.

Posted by: DownSouth | September 17, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Traitor.

Posted by: dem in chicago | September 17, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

This woman pushed her headquarters up her hindquarters. Nattering cheese-cake eating moron.

Posted by: euro.guy | September 17, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

And this person is???? Maybe she can bundle all the money from all the big sell offs — before the government stepped in. You know the ones that got the stock for nothing and turned a profit anyway.

Posted by: paulet | September 17, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

An elitist calling someone else an “elitist” is the height of hypocrisy…it’s like being for deregulation your life and then, suddenly in the midst of economic catastrophe…oh, wait, she endorsed McCain, right? Got it.

Posted by: Oh, Lovey... | September 17, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

From a woman who splits her time between London and New York – just like your average American! Her 15 minutes of fame is just about over.

Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/Sep08b-Elec.pdf
The same poll that had McCain +10 last week has Obama +5 this week hahahahaha!
/me waits for the Republican troll excuses…

Posted by: Emily | September 17, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

WAIT A MINUTE. One of the richest women in the WORLD, Lady Rothschild, is claiming Obama is the elitist? Oh, that is classic.

Posted by: LOL | September 17, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Wow, this seems to have struck a nerve. I can always tell- it’s when a whole bunch of Obama followers hurry up and make sure they get in their whole “this doesn’t matter…” or “who is this person…” “oh no- she’s the elite one!” and my all-time favorite “she’s racist.”

Posted by: Patrick | September 17, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

who cares.

Posted by: keith | September 17, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

WOW. What? Can the woman not speak her mind? I thought that the Democratic Party was in support of people expressing themselves, putting to use that right granted by the First Amendment? I guess that it can be utilized so long as it is in support of democratic causes. You really need to grow up and realize that not everyone who does not support Obama is a racist. I am African-American and I don’t like him. Like this donor, I too think that he is a bit of an elitist, and I am an educated man. We all have the right to make a decision as we see fit and based on who we think would be best suited for running the country. I don’t think that Obama is that man. When he can be honest with the American people about the real problem in Washington, the people like his running mate who are fixtures there, and can put forth a REAL plan for governing, as opposed to just criticizing the republicans, then MAYBE some of these Democrats who refuse to vote for him would consider it. The problem with the Democrats, in a nutshell, is that they believe that they know what’s best for people. How about letting the people make some decisions for themselves??

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

Why will Palin not co-operate with investigators on troopergate? She scares the hell out of me.

Posted by: keith | September 17, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

It would be nice if the ENTIRE statement was in this article.
Here it is:
“In an election as important as this, we must choose the candidate who has a proven record of bipartisanship and reforming government, and that’s John McCain,” Rothschild said. “We can’t afford a president who lacks experience and judgment and has never crossed party lines to work for meaningful reform. Amid tough economic times and foreign policy concerns, we need someone who is ready to lead. Although I am a Democrat, I recognize that it’s more important to put country ahead of party and that’s why I support John McCain.”

Posted by: Franconia | September 17, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

as soon as I read… “thinks she is pretty cool” I was done. Seriously? This lady is a moron.

Posted by: matt w | September 17, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

If this was the other way, it would be deemed divine intervention. Who care? A lot of people voting for McCain/Palin care.

Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 17, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Obama fans learn well — if a person doesn’t favor Obama, sling slime! But never, never get around to a real issue. Doing so exposes the shallow one’s lack of depth.

Posted by: dl | September 17, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Why won’t she cooperate?? MAYBE it is because, just as the Democrats claimed when the Republicans were trying to impeach Bill Clinton, that she sees this as a big witch hunt? I would not cooperate either. Once a level of fairness comes into play, then she should cooperate. As long as the panel is being chaired by an avowed Obama supporter, I would not cooperate either.

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Let’s exercise our right to free speech while we still can. Our right to privacy is all but shot, thanks in part to Obama’s vote in favor of the government wire-tapping whoever, whenever they want.

Posted by: Patrick | September 17, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Just great – another idiotic Clinton supporter joins the ranks. I can’t stand Clinton and don’t agree with her on anything. I think Ron Paul has got the right idea. When all of these crazies start supporting our candidate, something has got to be wrong with our candidate.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 17, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Straight from Obama’s mouth: “Let the race-baiting begin!”

Posted by: dl | September 17, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

If I were still a Democrat (after the primaries I was not) I’d be embarrassed by the nastiness of my party. I would not have thought such liberal people would be so mean, snide and downright abusive to anyone who doesn’t go along with their agenda.
I’m one of the many new (formerly democratic) independents.

Posted by: Franconia | September 17, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

“Once a level of fairness comes into play, then she should cooperate. As long as the panel is being chaired by an avowed Obama supporter, I would not cooperate either.”
The moron was saying that there was going to be a big October suprise. Too bad she can’t fire him too.

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Never heard of the “Lady”, and don’t expect to ever hear from her again.:-)
“de Rothschild” doesn’t like Obama because he seems like an elitist! LOL
Sounds like she could use a little MORE education, though.
1. It is NOT the Democrats who keep using the “choice issue” as a noose around women’s necks”. That would be the pro-lifer’s.
2. She’s not worried about Roe V. Wade being overturned, since it has withstood 8 years of the Bush administration? Well, that is phenomenally stupid. Roe v. Wade has not been overturned because the conservatives do not YET have a bullet-proof majority in the Supreme Court. If McCain/Palin win they will cetainly have the opportunity to stack the court with conservatives for years to come.
An incredibly stupid argument.

Posted by: niccolo m@chiavelli | September 17, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

“I didn’t leave the Democratic party, the Democratic party left me.”
Huh?
It was disingenuous when Reagan said it, and an outright lie when Ms. Rothschild uttered it. The policy differences between Obama and Clinton (whom Rothschild favored) are microscopic. It’s nonsense for anyone to claim that opting for Obama over Clinton constitutes a change in the party’s tenets or prescriptions.
Look, I have no problem with Rothschild or anyone else selecting one candidate over another, and speaking to one’s choice. But making up a phony “explanation” such as this is something else entirely. By saying what she did (assuming the quote is accurate), Lynn de Rothschild is either a liar or a stupid person. She’s John McCain’s problem now.

Posted by: Stendhal | September 17, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

I hope more and more high profile Dems get on board the Maverick/Reformer ticket….instead of staying in the closet. I’m sure Hill and Bill are going to be voting the McCain/Palin ticket too, so she can run again in 2012.

Posted by: Debra | September 17, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Rothschild going to get trashed by the libs, TOO?? Libs are so dumb – they can’t figure out why some women DON’T AGREE WITH THE LIB GOBBDLDEGOOK!! “STRONG CONSERVATIVE WOMEN” DO NOT EXIST IN THE LIBERAL MINDSET. As Spock would say: “IT IS NOT RATIONAL.” But then rationally is not part of the lib mindset either. Example? “WE KNOW NOTHING ABOUT PALIN.” Then why did the libs and mainstream media started trashing her within an hour after her address to the Rep Convention? FEAR – NO DOUBT!!!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 17, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

“WHY ARE THE REPUBS SO IN LOVE WITH THE WEALTHY—I MEAN SUPER WEALTHY”
Do you want to rethink that, Babs?

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Personally, I wish people would be more responsible with their spending and credit. I feel for the people who lose their jobs and have to lose their homes. It’s the ones that bought enormous homes and ridiculously expensive SUVs that they couldn’t afford-and they knew it- when they lose their homes I don’t feel for them.
I am going to school on loans that I will have to pay back. I have a tiny apartment that I can afford and I take the bus. It’s not glamourous, but I’m not struggling and stressing, trying to pay things I shouldn’t have got in the first place!

Posted by: Roscoe | September 17, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Yesterday, lots of bad economic news, lots of people still hurting from Ike and where does Obama wind up last night? Hollywood fund raiser – with all the other crazies. Did he have his teleprompter with him? Rothschild has it right – THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HAS LEFT HER – AND MILLIONS OF OTHERS. I live in OH and many of the guys I work with are long time Dems, BUT NOT IN THIS ELECTION!!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 17, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Yeah…the elite turned out last night for a $30,000 a person fundraiser where BO hauled in 10 million (or about a thousand a second) to hear Streisand. Add that to the 66 million BO brought in in August, but heard BO needs 40 million in FL alone to battle McCain (who is ahead there). As usual, Obama spending 3 to 1 overall against McCain. When is he going to get it? Eighty five percent of this country has made up their minds DESPITE THE DEBATES. When this thing is over $800 million will have been flushed down the toilet during financial crisis…is there something wrong with this system or what?
Lynn Forester (Rothschild) has it right. McCain bucks his own party, Bush, is BI PARTISAN and wants the best and brightest in his cabinet…REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS, the wealthiest to take only $1 a year. Doesn’t care who gets credit….egos aside (doesn’t sound much like Obama).
Obama was will to diddle with an early troop withdrawl so as to benefit him….is there anything this guy has done for ANYONE BUT HIMSELF?

Posted by: Debra | September 17, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

rodney — you’re an idiot !!!

Posted by: dl | September 17, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Let’s me honest this person voting for her tax benifits to remain the same. She has the right to change her mind,but that is one vote, young people will win this election, because unlike the old folks with limited education, they have a better sense of knowing the McCain/Palin will not do it for them this election. Stop believing in polls, how many of you have been apart of any? Obama is winning, and by the way she made her money the same way McCain did, marry it.

Posted by: ashmaya | September 17, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

She’s exactly right. She is just one of millions who feel screwed over by the DNC. And the more you bash her, the more like her we’ll see.

Posted by: Viv | September 17, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

And Rodney, using all caps makes you look like a child.

Posted by: Viv | September 17, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

After the way Hillary threw in the towel at the convention, I can understand why her supporters might switch to McCain.
Hillary disgraced herself AND her contributors (like me) by giving up without a fight.
I never thought Hillary Clinton would melt into such a wimp.

Posted by: Rhys | September 17, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Come on media trolls.
This is a person with a landed title “Lady” who is married to the Duke of Norfolk or some such title.
She has the audacity to call a mixed race male, raised by a single mother and her parents who worked hard an elitist?
Who here is stupid enough to buy that?

Posted by: Morpheum | September 17, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Did lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild of London, wife of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild just call Obama an elitist?
These words are razors to my wounded heart!

Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 17, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

I hate to tell you this BUT, being an “elitist” has very little to do with how much money one has. It has a lot to do with the person thinking he is better than anyone else. I know a lot of poor people who would fit that bill. You know the ones–those who are unemployed, living with mom and dad, but are too good to work at McDonald’s or Burger King. the same ones who look down on others who do.

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

I care about this woman – and all the other Democrats like me who are voting McCain for similar reasons

Posted by: Another Democrat Voting McCain | September 17, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

McCain on the side of big business and big money? Ah…. exuse me, BUT WHERE IS IT? You didn’t see McCain at some “FATCAT” Hollywood fundraiser last night!! Stats now show the the dems are supported by more rich guys than the reps. Problem is dem rich guys don’t invest and risk capital to start and maintain business, repcats do.

Posted by: Jimbo | September 17, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Niko is right. I knew he was arrogant when I saw him with his nose high up in the air while trying to debate with Hillary. The San Francisco comment just drove it home.

Posted by: Patrick | September 17, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

I care about this woman – and all the other Democrats like me who are voting McCain for similar reasons
Posted by: Another Democrat Voting McCain | Sep 17, 2008
Glad you care about her and not the United States.

Posted by: Emily | September 17, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Why would I care who this person wants to vote for ?
Why would America REWARD complete Republican failure ?

Posted by: PulSamsara | September 17, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I live in Florida and I can tell the polls are wrong, but like Bush, McCain will try to steal the election hear as well, by sending out false info, and make sure the machine does not work. My neighbors bumper states “red neck for Obama.”

Posted by: ashmaya | September 17, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Elitist – come on one only needs to look at her name to know that she is what she claims Obama to be. The Rothschild name can be traced back hundreds of years and their money as long.
But oh really cares what this elitist person thinks – she is so out of touch with everyday reality (like McCain) that she thinks the DNC left her -

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Congress has authority over financial and budgetary matters, For the past 2 years that Democrats
have been leading the Congress. Things have been sour and the financial woes are
getting worse, simply Democrat Nancy Pelosi and Democrat Harry Reid were sleeping at the switch
and taking vacations while the rest of the country is financially going down the drain.
Last spring Nancy Pelosi forced congress in vacation and let the national security bill
expire risking our national security and last summer vacation Nancy Pelosi with out fail took a vacation while americans
where paying $4/gallon of gas. This is your Typical Liberal Democrat way of doing things
in Washington and this is the CHANGE that Obama wants, mind you these are Obama’s friends
who think alike and do things alike.

Posted by: 2nfer | September 17, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Putting Sen. John McCain in charge of “reforming” the financial system is like appointing “Billy the Kid” Sheriff of Dodge.
1. The signature moment in Sen. John McCain’s political career remains his support of Keating – when McCain used his political influence to try to help his crony (and significant donor to his political campaigns) of the hook in the S & L scandal.
2. McCain has repeatedly admitted he “does not understand the economy”.
3. Various factors have come together to create the current meltdown, but certainly one of the central factors has been the lessening of capital requirements in the financial markets, and the loosening of government regulation and federal oversight. Who is responsible for this? Sen. John McCain, the “free market” automatons in the Republican party, and – as much as any one else – former Senator, now bank lobbyist Phil Gramm.
Note: Phil Gramm is currently Sen. John McCain’s key economic advisor. He wrote and pushed THE bill through Congress that deregulated the financial markets.
4. McCain (along with many of his Republican colleagues) has always fought for LESS regulation of the financial markets. He has always and consistently argued over his LONG career that the problem is too much regulation.
5. Food for thought: Pres. Bush, former Sen. Phil Gramm, and Sen. John McCain have been the most vocal proponents of privatizing Social Security (i.e. investing social security funds in the stock market). Today would truly be a black Tuesday, if they had been allowed to act on this agenda.
Sen. John McCain would still like to Social Security!
6. McCain doesn’t even know how many houses he owns. The excuse he’s given is that these houses are “investments”, and “who keeps track of the specifics of their investments”. Clearly, John McCain does not. This is hardly the kind of reponsible and informed leadership this country needs. He kind even keep his own (seven) “house(s) in order.” The idea that he could keep our nation’s financial house in order is LUDICROUS.
7. Gov. Palin continues to spout her deranged, contradictory, ill-informed opinions on the campaign trail. The other day she first said: We must solve this crisis by “regulating” the financial markets” and in the very same breathe she said “the solution to this crisis is to make the government stop “meddling in the free markets”. She is truly an idiot.
========================================
As to all you idiot bloggers on this post who get all of your information from shock jocks like Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh – why don’t you read a paper or something?
The Bush administration just purchased AIG, putting the U.S. taxpayer on the hook for the debts of a multibillion dollar financial giant.
U.S. taxpayers are being forced to shoulder the debt of a private bank that made some incredibly stupid mistakes?
Whose the Marxist/Socialist/Commie now?
The Republicans have nationalized the U.S. financial system, that makes the Republican party the Communist party as of today.:-)
Republicans are Commies!
Better dead than red…
Vote Obama/Biden 2008!

Posted by: niccolo m@chiavelli | September 17, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Putting Sen. John McCain in charge of “reforming” the financial system is like appointing “Billy the Kid” Sheriff of Dodge.
Food for thought: Pres. Bush, former Sen. Phil Gramm, and Sen. John McCain have been the most vocal proponents of privatizing Social Security (i.e. investing social security funds in the stock market). Today would truly be a black Tuesday, if they had been allowed to act on this agenda.
Sen. John McCain would still like to privatize Social Security!
The Republicans have nationalized the U.S. financial system, that makes the Republican party the Communist party as of today.:-)
Republicans are Commies!
Better dead than red…
Vote Obama/Biden 2008!

Posted by: niccolo m@chiavelli | September 17, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

If its a personal decision why make it public? She can vote as she wishes — so her only reason to announce this is to hypocritically influence other votes. The Republican ticket deserves her and the few who will listen to her.

Posted by: Christopher Burrows | September 17, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Yo Jimbo -
The fat cats in Florida that attended McSames’ bash where he raised 5 mil weren’t poor people , maybe not celeb’s, but definitly not poor. So what ya got to say to that?

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

ashmaya: Nothing to steal; this election is Obama’s to lose and he is doing a fine job of that all by himself. He needs to put out some specific policy proposals–make himself look presidential–and do a better job of relating to working class people. Once he does that, he AMY be able to squeak out a win. I guess tha the Democrats did not learn that lesson when they put John Kerry on the ballot 4 years ago. While I think both are honorable men–John Kerry more so than Barack, both have a hard time getting middle America to see eye-to-eye with them. I did not think John Kerry was an elitist–just too intelligent for his own good. Obama, on the other hand, while just as intelligent, if not more so than Kerry, just comes off as smug and condescending.

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

On why she’s voting for Hillary: “I think if history is our guide, we’ve had stronger economies, more wealth creation, under Democratic presidents than we have under Republican presidents.” Oops!

Posted by: Calvin | September 17, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Right on.

Posted by: Agreed | September 17, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Emily. your post re. “Another Democrat” was not rational. You are GLAD that she might not care for the United States? “It does not make any sense, Commander.” When I speak about the libs being not rational, your post was a perfect example of that. DON’T THEY TEACH INDUCTIVE AND DEDUCTIVE REASONING IN COLLEGE ANYMORE?

Posted by: Jimbo | September 17, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

There goes the duchess vote. That’s going to be rough. If we also lose the empress vote, that might be 3 more. We have to keep those baronesses on board or the ship will sink. I’d say if you’re a millionaire, go ahead and vote McCain. I mean what do you care if the country goes bankrupt because of your tax cuts. Having more than you need or will ever need is what is so much more important.

Posted by: Mickey | September 17, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

jozy: Following your logic, or lack thereof, that would make the Kennedys elitists as well. The family which seems to be the beloved dynasty of the Democrats, the one that most Democrats want Obama to emulate. If that is your logic, then I agree with you. If not, go back to the drawing board and try again

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Yeah Obama, just keep calling everyone a racist.
That’s no way to win my vote.

Posted by: brent22 | September 17, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

I agree with her … and I don’t think it makes you a racist to not trust someone who attended an anti-white-America,anti-America church for 20+ years … it is just using common sense. Throwing your “ol uncle” Pastor under the bus doesn’t change the facts!!

Posted by: DEM4McCain | September 17, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

She is right and millions of Democrats like myself are voting for McCain .Why didn’t the party get a man like Colin Powell. I know he is a Rep.or a John Glenn any Democrat with some exp and who has had a real job,besides this guy.I am embarssed to tell people I am a Democrat.Nancy P and Kennedy think they can run the country using Obama like a puppet.They could never be Pres.so lets get a dummy and prop him up !

Posted by: Floyd | September 17, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Mack: If you lost the democratic party your lucky because your not losing much. Obama is the worst underhanded candidate that ever ran for office and the dumbest. He lacks the experience that former president’s had before they won the presidency. He is a know nothing, do nothing and says nothing. If elected, Biden will run the country.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 17, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

I suppose she’s purchased an ambassadorship from the Clintons–and that the offer is still valid if Hillary wins in 2012. Yes, it’s a “personal” decision all right.
Hereditary wealth, hedge fund parasites are the last thing this country needs right now. (This country’s probably the last thing they need now, too, since they’re certainly already sucked our economy completely dry.)

Posted by: Sportin' Life | September 17, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

I guess there’s always one dumb woman who will switch over because the VP candidate has the same internal plumbing as her.

Posted by: firecracker | September 17, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

I think that she may need a job soon. She won’t find in on this side of the net. If you look at the record you’ll find that McCain is firmly in the hands, and pockets, of the special interests.

Posted by: Marcus | September 17, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Jimbo wrote:
“Stats now show the the dems are supported by more rich guys than the reps.”
As of Sept 2. 2008, 54% of money raised by McCain came from large donors ($2,300+) compared to 29% for Obama. Still, Obama has out-raised McCain because of his large number of small donors.
(Source: Center for Responsive Politics)

Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 17, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

How many vetos did Bush applied? Most of you blogging have no idea how government works. GOP are against socialism until it benefit them. Like ?Fannie and AIG. Sad that most of you are blaming every folks for the country’s economic problem. My brother has been deployed 4 times. First without proper gear, we had to pay for it. So he stood a chance of coming home alive.

Posted by: ashmaya | September 17, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

one loss like this isnt nothing.she has the right as a american to vote for anyone she wants .BUT SHE SHOULD HAVE REGISTERED REPUBLICAN OR INDEPENDENT NOT DEMOCRAT! brain cells missing. she is only attention seeking :)

Posted by: beth | September 17, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

She don’t like him because he is black and joined her elitist group by his hard work but she got it by exploitation the society. that is why she don’t like him. Racist!!!

Posted by: JOJO | September 17, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

SURE Calvin. SIX YEARS OF ECONOMIC BOOM TIMES UNDER BUSH, UNTIl……. WHO TOOK OVER CONGRESS IN 06? DUH…

Posted by: Jimbo | September 17, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

I love how the people her pro McCain are saying, “Oh no, don’t talk trash about this nutjob lady because you disagree with her,” while Republicans have been doing it for the last 8 years.
McCain supporters are the most frothy at the mouth, not to mention (appropriately) the most hypocritical.
McCain is a damn liar.

Posted by: RR | September 17, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Niko: I agree with everything you said. And I agree with Rothchildfor not voting for Obama. She was a Hillary supporter but what she said about Obama is true. He cannot be trusted. His word is no good. His speeches are copied from the book of RFK. And he will not do what he says he will do. He just wants to make history and the heck with the country.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 17, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Sportin’ Life … it wasn’t poor people in Hollywood that gave Obama $9-million last night … you don’t think David Geffen and his buddies don’t want favors … look how Geffen treated Clinton after Clinton backed down from his promises to Geffen!

Posted by: DEM4McCain | September 17, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Vladimir Ilyich Lenin reincarnated as Hussein Obama. The good old days are coming back.Those were the days my friend.As soon as Obama is president, he will introduce his 5 year plan.

Posted by: Karl | September 17, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Lynn is the type of person who thinks for herself, so she was not taken in by the smears of Governor Palin. She is a self-made woman, having already made millions buying and selling broadband licences when she married into the famous Jewish banking family in a London Synogogue. — Howard Richman http://www.jews4palin.blogspot.com

Posted by: Howard | September 17, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Funny democrats. They never uttered a syllable about her while she was raising millions for the democratic party for years. Now, they’re trashing her.
O-bots learn from the shallow one to sling crap when anyone points out their master’s ineptitude.

Posted by: dl | September 17, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Good riddance! Let her go support McCain. It doesn’t sound like she supports the ideals of FDR anyway. She and the Republicans can celebrate 100,000 dead Iraqis, 4,300 dead American soldiers, 9/11, a destroyed economy and all the other horrors the Republican Party has brought upon America over the last eight years. If I were Hillary, I would give back every penny this woman raised for her. Hillary must be wretching right now.

Posted by: Dan Rains | September 17, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

Yeah, Jimbo – the trashing of Palin was really a BRILLIANT move by libs and media. WORKED OUT REALLY WELL!! But then I guess you can’t blame them – not capable of in-depth discussion of issues (OBAMA) so TRASHING AND MAKING UP FAIRY TALE STORIES ABOT PALIN – IS ABOUT ALL THEY HAVE LEFT!!

Posted by: Manitu | September 17, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Well, with Obama’s tax plan that raises taxes a bit for the wealthy, you have to expect that at least one wealthy kook would get ticked off!

Posted by: Randall | September 17, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

hmm thats the way i read it too DownSouth!
lady rothschild indeed!!
thats “the pot calling the kettle black”
(no pun intended!)

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Niko_in_Oakland -
The Kennedy’s made their money off bootlegging – so are they a bunch of Elitist – possibly. One only needs to looks at Teddy and his history. JFK and RFK never had a chance to do much of anything – they were taken out by who really knows – not the people who were convicted I asure you. As for my logic, perhaps you need to study where the Rothschild money came from – golly old england
“According to several authors, the family fortune was built upon money embezzled from William IX, who was paid an enormous sum by the British government to provide Hessian soldiers to fight American colonists during the Revolutionary War. William handed over this money to Mayer for investment, but instead it reportedly was used to establish his son Nathan as head of the London branch of the family banking house.
Mayer eventually repaid the money but ‘Nathan manipulated the situation in such a way that this became the origin of the enormous Rothschild fortune,’ (David) Icke wrote.
Biographer Derek Wilson acknowledged this by writing, ‘It was the temporary diversion of the immense sums of money originating in Hesse-Kassel which enabled N. M. [as Nathan liked to be called] to launch his banking operation, providing him with both liquidity and prestige’. ”
So before you go blowing your horn – learn a little more about history.

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Dan, I guess that it was an OVERSIGHT that you forgot to thank Pres Bush, military and intelligence agencies for NO ATTACKS ON OUR HOMELAND in LAST SEVEN YEARS – GEE, I WONDER HOW THAT WAS POSSIBLE? MUST HAVE BEEN JUST A LUCKY STREAK!!

Posted by: Manitu | September 17, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

“John McCain will look for the best solutions to America’s problems.
translation : “John McCain will look after me and the rest of the rich because he is rich too…”

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

And Niko -
not all democrats are filty rich. Nor do we fall in line just because we’re told to. And that means we don’t all believe as the filty rich do.

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Listen Dems, The GOP needed this boost. Everything else is going wrong for them. So the only thing they can do, is to show how narrow and shallow their are thinking! Let give it to them in Nov. and ignore their comments, because really that is all they have!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: ashmaya | September 17, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Ironic.. because if Palin ever becomes President, women will lost their rights to a personal decision.

Posted by: Gus | September 17, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Mantui -
It wasn’t because of the GW BUSH that we weren’t attacked – they succeded at their purpose, the collapse of our econmoic system. Surely you can’t believe that a boob who couldn’t take care of the Katrina disaster can keep a terrorist out of our country?????

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

For a group of people clinging to a candidate who’s struggling to manage a tie in the nationals (and is losing the electoral map) you’re certainly smug.
Obama’s running against a 73 year-old skin cancer survivor who’s closely aligned with Bush, and he still can’t manage to put this thing away.
This woman’s endorsement is the least of your problems.

Posted by: wheres_the_teleprompter | September 17, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I don’t know the Rothschilds. I am a retired Catholic elementary teacher.
McCain/Palin 08 – A CLASS ACT WITH…. MEANINGFUL CHANGE!!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 17, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Wow. An out-of-touch billionaire is supporting McCain. You remember, McCain, the guy who wants to continue tax breaks for the rich. The guy who thinks you are middle class until you make more than $5 million. John “Manyhouses” McCain.

Posted by: Leda | September 17, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I think Obama, Pelosi, and Reed are too far to the left also. It scares me to think what this democratic congress and Obama may do. Also, I do not like how the Obama campaign tried to smear Geraldine Ferraro and now Sarah Palin. Geraldine Ferraro talked about her “supposedly” racist comments on NBC Nightly News with subsitute host Anne Curry and Ferraro sain the Obama campaign dug those comments up from some women’s conference to a reporter of a small newspaper to hurt the Clinton campaign. Ferraro also said the OBAMA campaign tried to get her fired from the job with which the Obama campagin thought she worked. This is creepy, Joe McCarthy, Richard Nixon type stuff. I do not trust any investigations backed by Obama supporters.

Posted by: formerdemocrat | September 17, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Posted by: Samantha, A Black Woman From IL | September 17, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

a teacher, clinical professor and liberal disaffected democrat, i am voting mccain because the dem party left me too.

Posted by: ron | September 17, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Jimbo -
My sympathy’s to you then – for getting this wrong and still believing that GOP’s mean well…

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Jozy.
PROFOUND! Any in-depth discussion on .. let’s see.. How about Obama’s desire to increase the capital gains tax??

Posted by: Manitu | September 17, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

“….The policy differences between Obama and Clinton (whom Rothschild favored) are microscopic……”
.
The differences between Hillary’s beliefs and Obama’s words are microscopic….BUT many of us do NOT believe that he means them. And 13 months in the Senate before deciding to run for President doesn’t provide much of a record on which to judge those words.

Posted by: charlie35 | September 17, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

A simple comment about this true ELITIST, FILTY RICH WOMAN -turned Republican. I am very disappointed at this woman for acting like she truly supported Clinton and then turn around and say she is now supporting MCSAne. Did she just discover McSane today or did she know of him while supporting Hillary. What a hypocrite! That :”I really think that they [McCain and Palin] will bring the bold, bipartisan, centrist change we need in Washington,” said Rothschild.
ANd she did not know what Macain stood for while supporting Hillary? Surprise- Mcasin was born the other day when he Palim….”John McCain will look for the best solutions to America’s problems. Like save the financial markets of which he knows very little. He is not an ideologue and he is not beholden to special interests.” – Madam- you are so blind and actually seem ignorant. Go count the number of lobbyists that Macin has in his camp. It is good riddance from the Dem Party. We do not need hypocrites like you.
Bye

Posted by: Mikoko | September 17, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Come on Samantha, A Black Woman From IL – get some real factual blog to express your facts, if you can find one.
You people are so satisfied with crap in your coffee, your afraid to try drinking it without the crap in it.

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

jozy: WHo cares where the money comes from? I don’t. My point, to contrast yours, was that if SHE is an elitist, so are the Kennedys, the “darling child” of the Democratic Party. So, to attack her for being an elitist is to attack the Democratic Party for being a hub for elitist, as one of its most prominent families would surely fall into that category following your logic. Just because the money came from England does not make it any more important (or less so) than if it was earned here. Money is still money, regardless of how it is earned or inherited.

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

“There goes the duchess vote. That’s going to be rough. If we also lose the empress vote, that might be 3 more. We have to keep those baronesses on board or the ship will sink.” Mickey
hehehe…:0 g1 Mick…

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Indeed it would be a personal decision. Personal to her keeping her wealth intact.
Some call her a defector.
Defector? Naw, she was a mole.
This woman is an elite that belongs next to McCain on the great Republican “Platform de Rothschilds”.
Its like fine wine to the wealthy is the Republican brand. So elite, you must be in the $100 million plus wealth category and have at least enough homes that you forget where some of them are…..

Posted by: PaulStewart9 | September 17, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Manitu
If your like most middle class – exactly what do you have to fear? If your making more than – 250 k a year, your not most middle class. As far as the cap gains tax – why not? If you look at the majority of taxes being paid in this country – while the wealthy pay the highest precentages, they do not pay the bulk of the taxes , they come form the other 90% of taxpayers

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

I can understand why some Democrats supported Hillary Clinton over Barak Obama. I can understand why some female Democrats are disappointed that Sen. Obama and not Sen. Clinton won the Democratic nomination. But I don’t understand how a pro-choice Democrat can support the McCain-Palin ticket. McCain’s policies will continue those of the current administration. Both McCain and Palin oppose abortion rights, and if McCain is elected and appoints a conservative to the Supreme Court, kiss Roe v. Wade goodbye. This woman simply doesn’t get it. And once again, I have to wonder if “elitist” is PC-speak for “uppity.”

Posted by: Alex | September 17, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Josy
Bush wanted to collapse our economic system? WHY? Doesn’t make any sense commander!

Posted by: Manitu | September 17, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

To me, her comments on Obama are obviously the mark of a closet racist.

Posted by: PaulStewart9 | September 17, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Oh, by the way is Cindy McCain running for VP? she is on the trail more than PALIN

Posted by: ashmaya | September 17, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Nice try Niko_in_Oakland -
as i said the Kennedy’s may be elitist – but they are not the hub of the democratic party. Unlike you republicans – the democratic party is for many of the people, not the few (wealthy). We support trying to equal the field – not to distance ourselves from the others.

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

$28,500 plus several thousands more PER PERSON to have a bite with Obama and Streisand?
A huge tab for the Greek Temple rally/acceptance?
Raising 66million in August and still crying poverty (because he pays street money to swell voter registrations and get out the vote)?
Obama = “Just gimme money (yours)”
And by the way, surviving cancer used to be a good thing, until the Obamabots decided to pollute the airwaves. Give ‘em time and they’ll be making fun of people with AIDS. After all, anyone who isn’t “young and buff” is ready for the slag heap. You will find out that people well over 40, 50, 60 and more are very, very serious about voting.

Posted by: Mandelay3 | September 17, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Alex. I believe that as important as the abortion issue is, Rothschild obviously felt that far more is at stake in this election. IT IS CALLED… A MATTER OF PRIORIES!!

Posted by: Manitu | September 17, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Alex: Maybe some of Hillary’s supporters weren’t pro-choice? Or, better yet, maybe not all democrats are single issue voters?? While abortion may be at the top of some people’s list for supporting a candidate, it really is just a blip on my radar, and I am pro-choice. As someone who has spent a lifetime studying politics, and considers himself a political junkie, I look at the candidates in totality, not just a single issue. What’s more important to me is someone who can, and will, break with his party if that is what is required to move the country forward. As a democrat, Bill Clinton was willing to do that, and John McCain, as a Republican, has shown a willingness to do the same. I am still waiting on Barack Obama to show that he can and has done so on an important piece of legislation

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Mantui -
You misunderstood my remarks, the terrorist were trying to collaspe our economic system – not bush – and they by all appearances have. How – by striking at our hub of commerce – the very symbol of our economy – the towers. Oh it would take time after they fell, but you only need look around you to see the results

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Rodney above needs to not yell with caps. I understand he is completely invested in the first black man as Prez. but this is not the candidate to be POTUS. Voting for someone just because of their skin color or gender is ridiculous…it should be who has earned this honor…experience and judgement….McCain!

Posted by: Emma | September 17, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I think Obama and Pelosi and Reed are too far to the left too. A democratic congress and an untested democratic president is pretty scary. I used to be a democrat who supported Hillary Clinton but apparently there is no room for moderate or conservative democrats like myself. I now support McCain and have left the democratic party for good.

Posted by: hello | September 17, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

GW is going to be Huntsville, Al tomorrow – 1k to eat and 10 k to have your picture taken. I guess that the GOP’er just can’t get as much money as the DNC can.

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

So, just because this woman does not support Obama, and his “supposed goal of leveling the playing field, that makes her an elitist?? EVEN THOUGH, she has been a mjor democratic supporter and fundraiser?? ONCE again, your logic is flawed. I repeat my earlier statement: who cares where the money come from?? I don’t! Instead of harping over where someone else got their money, people need to get a clue and come up with a plan to make their own. Even the Kennedys did it–through bootlegging!

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Gov. Palin is doing a town hall with McCain tonight and is on Hannity in taped interview. Why won’t Obama do 10 town halls? That’s why the ads became more agressive. Why does BO run scared as he did when Hill wanted more debates? It only shows his weakness.

Posted by: Emma | September 17, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Josy.
Do you have any idea what the mean income is of all those paying capital gains taxes? I ASSURE YOU THAT MOST OF US ARE FAR FROM BEING FAT CATS. YOU NEED TO EXPAND YOUR HORIZONS BEYOND ACADEMIA. (Retired Catholic Elementary teacher).

Posted by: Manitu | September 17, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

The few wealthy–how many of you poor people in the Democratic party can afford $28,000 just to see Babs sing & Obama speak??? And, to bring in close to $10 million dollars tells me that there are more than just a “FEW” rich people in the party. Considering, that is what most of middle America makes in a year, I am having a hard time agreeing with you.

Posted by: Niko_in_Oakland | September 17, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Jose.
The people who were responsible for this current economic situation were NOT the terrorists, but the Dems in congress who would not take ANY ACTION on this problem and rebuffed Pres. Bush’ efforts to wake them up!!

Posted by: Manitu | September 17, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

I TOO WAS A DEMOCRAT MY ENTIRE LIFE, NOW VOTING FOR MCCAIN “DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN!!!!” IT SPEAKS VOLUMES WHEN SHE QUOTED REAGAN, I DID NOT LEAVE MY PARTY MY PARTY LEFT ME…..LOONEY FAR FAR LEFT LIBS….I WAS A DEMOCRAT NOT A LOONEY LEFTY, THEY HAVE TAKEN OVER MY PARTY AND I FEEL THE USA IS WORTHY OF MUCH MORE THAN THAT!!! U S A U S A!
MCCAIN-PALIN 2008!!

Posted by: massdem | September 17, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Good for you, lady …
STAND UP and be counted.
We, the 28% Hillary supporters join you.
Anyone with half a brain will know that OBAMA does not deserve the privilege of being the President of the United States.
This man is all about SELF PROMOTION AND AMBITION. There isn’t a single change bone in his entire body. His record of the past 10 years in politics show you that … NOT A SINGLE REFORM IN 10 YEARS … Yet he manages to write 2 memoirs for PERSONAL GAIN…
OBAMA IS CON ALL THE WAY.

Posted by: OBAMA IS POLITICAL CON | September 17, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Go back and read where the Rothschild got their money from – they are Elitist – period. Never mind she had supported the DNC in the past she would still be an elitist. For her to call Obama – who is not an Elitist – one is simply riduclous. If you and others with simlar mindsets would give Obama a chance – you might find out that he can break the scumbag of Washington open and really change the way that things get done.
So far – with all of the campaigning he has had to do – and stopping the rumors of being a muslim, he hates america, and everything else that mccain has thrown at him he might be able to state his plan – but so far all he has had time to do is fight off the vicous attacks from the GOP and the smear tactics they have used.
He has a message of hope – and to quote the mccain campaign – his message is similar to what I imagine that JC did over 2k years ago – a message of hope – but back then people didn’t believe either……

Posted by: jozy | September 17, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

LOL….listen to all the kool-aid drinkers trash-talking this former Democrat party stalwart.
You just don’t get it, but you will as more like her defect.
Drink up!

Posted by: Mark | September 17, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Ireland recently cut taxes across the board … AND THE PLACE IS BOOMIMG!!! BACIC, SIMPLE ECONOMICS 101. THE DEMS HERE HAVE NO UNDERSTANG OF THIS!!

Posted by: Jimbo | September 17, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Dems drafted a kill drill bill and with no incentives it will never pass. They act “as if”, but this is ridiculous when 70% of Americans want to drill and the Dem congress puts a stop to it. How are we going to send a message to Middle East when we aren’t willing to drill in our own backyard?
McCain is right on this….expand our energy here.

Posted by: Emma | September 17, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I would like to know in real “wallet terms” exactly what the Obama healthcare plan would cost. I have seen some news reports that show he would give thousands of dollars in tax subsidies to people who currently pay no tax. I do not see how this is reasonable considering our debt and deficit. It sounds like a redistribution of wealth. To me if you do not pay money into the system you should not get something handed to you for free. I think some people should not have to pay taxes because they make so little, but to then give them thousands of dollars in tax credits is ridiculous.

Posted by: hello | September 17, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

No doubt a real conservative republican bigot in a democratic facade. She does not like Obama, because deep down the white woman is a racist. As for being elite, she never bothered to take a look at good old boy John Sidney McCain the 111 heritage of being a son and grand son of her kind Washington DC connected and influence peddling and Mr. Preferential treatment all his life.. The SOB 72 year old pitbull, with four bouts on cancer and one foot in the grave has no record in the senate except for voting every time with his conservative republican and 90% with the failed Bush fiscal and foreign Policies.
McCain as far his economic know how, does not know how many houses he owns. Has not the foggiest as to where Iraq or Afghanistan are. The man is computer illiterate, cannot comb his own hair , tie his tie or clean his own A**.
He is a fake war hero and has a real military record that stinks worst then his very own conservative republican a** with perversity of inequality and rights only of his kind. The man is a through and through malignant narcissist, chronic scapegoater, uncorrectable grab bagger, who as per his life long lies and and personally hypocrisy, his so code of conduct and officer and a gentleman, is a slime bag, who considers himself beyond reproach but sacrifices others with lies, coercion, reckless abandon and impunity to promote his own outward/hypocrite self image of good and perfection.
As far as Lynn Forester de Rothschild, the gold digger, she ought to take a wiff of her own hypocrite elite stinking A** before calling Obama elite.
No wonder she know not a thing about the pentecostal evangelical conservative republican PAIN without their L. And nor he she bother to read anything about the Ms. goody goody’s control freaks life and fer fork tongue.
she need to just open the following tow links
http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/archieves/13582.html
http://news. bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7610891/stm

Posted by: Mohinder L. Jerath | September 17, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

folks who complain about income taxes captical gains taxes etc etc need to do something about it. here are some real ways to reduce the taxes you have to pay.
1) work less = make less money = pay less taxes ( i realize the word “work” is an oxymoron to most rich people but i thought i would toss it in there to give them the benefit of the doubt.
2) sell some spare houses/cars/boats/etc,then you will be able to pay the taxes on your personal island in the carribean.
3) move to haiti or venezuela (my pick for most republicans ,you will LOVE it!)
now there you go. quit complaining and do something constructive to help the economy or shut up.

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Palin gives checks back to Alaskians…my kind of Governor. She is doing great on Hannity and seems to understand the American people want change, more control of their future and lawmakers. I am a Hillary supporter for this Washinton outsider, reformer Gov. Palin.

Posted by: Emma | September 17, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

94 times Obama had a chance to vote for tax cuts and 94 times HE DIDN’T!

Posted by: Emma | September 17, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

WELL, A “ROTHSCHILD” LOVES MCCAIN. SURPRISE!!!
DIRTY MAC’S A CORRUPT PAWN OF THE GREEDY BANKS… LOOK AT HIS PERSONAL BRIBE TAKING DURING THE KEATING S&L CRISIS.
CHANGE? CHANGE HIS DRAWERS… LMAO

Posted by: CHUCK | September 17, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

who cares what she thinks? because rothschild didn’t get her way in selecting hillary as the nominee, she now chooses to vote for someone who represents the opposite of everything hillary espouses. that makes no sense ethically or logically. come to think of it, that makes the baroness (or whatever she is) a natural for the republican party.

Posted by: margaret | September 17, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

C’mon Chuck! You know Obama’s a complete mess….you can’t possibly say know that you know the man.
You’re drinking down what Barbra Streisand and the left-leaning media is mixing up for you. At least with McCain you KNOW his record…..do some freaking research you sheep!

Posted by: Up-Chuck | September 17, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

When push came to shove….the uber-rich will protect their own. McCain will make sure the de Rothschild’s won’t suffer by dumping their share of the Bush debt on the backs of the Middle Class….like always.
Then to think Palin is ‘cool’ though she’s knows nothing about her….THAT’S a reason to vote for ANYONE?
Caution! Bimbo Crossing

Posted by: Lee-Usa | September 17, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

94 times Obama had a chance to vote for tax cuts and 94 times HE DIDN’T!
Posted by: Emma | Sep 17, 2008 9:21:15 PM
========================================
How do you propose this government pay down the debt.
When you say cut government spending, be specific. Which programs do you think we should cut?
==============================
Bush & McCain cut taxes, but increase spending dramatically. At the end of the day, we the American taxpayer are left holding the bag – essentially making interest payments on loans we’ve taken out from China.
That’s Bush/McCain economic policy.
1. Deregulate the financial markets
2. Increase government spending
3. Cut taxes
4. Borrow from China
And when the investment banks go bankrupt, the government is expected to step in and absorb the losses of private companies.
When these companies were profitable, the private investors paid lower taxes, and took the profits.
When these investment banks go bankrupt, taxpayers get stuck with the bill.
Thank God Bush/McCain weren’t able to privatize Social Security, or this country’s economy would truly implode!
=============
Obama/Biden 2008

Posted by: niccolo m@chiavelli | September 17, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

You don’t have to be born into money to be elitist. Everyone knows that.
Definition of snob: A person who seeks to be a member of the upper classes and looks down on other classes such as lower classes.

Posted by: Patrick | September 17, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Obviously Hillary has to tacitly
support Obama and spout the
“party line” however this is a very big
deal!
More Dems will follow.
Abandon the Titanic(aka Obama Campaign)
and join McCain/Palin.
Country First!

Posted by: reaganfan | September 17, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

here is the most telling evidence yet that the republicans are the party of the rich and they run everything.
show me just 5 people who are employed in the top 10% of ANY major us financial institution who are democrats…i am waiting…
any democrats in the fed?
i mean real democrats ,not lady rothschilds turncoats types.
REPUBLICANS = THE PARTY OF THE RICH ,CORPORATIONS, THE ROTHSCHILDS ,NEIL BUSH,NEWT GINGRICH, THE CONFEDERATE FLAG WAVERS, THE “MORAL MAJORITY” (AHAHAHAHHA…) THE GUN HAPPY CROSS BURNING REDNECKS…
yes that is the republican party and their rather diverse (and largely repugnant) power base.

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

“”At least with McCain you KNOW his record”"
Yes! And it’s pathetic! The old war horse uses the excuse that he was tortured then turns around and claims what the US has done to Muslims can’t be called torture unless there’s major organ failure. So I guess his stay with the Viet Cong was really a lot more congenial than he was traded on before he cloned onto Bush.
That along with his dismal grasp of the economy and America can’t survive another Republican!

Posted by: Lee-Usa | September 17, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

If you do not pay ANY taxes into the federal system why should you get thousands of dollars back. CBS showed under Obama’s tax plan this would happen. Even if I qualified for these subsidies I would not accept them because it is just wrong. Also, if a person is on the fringe of going into a higher tax bracket I can see that the person would probably work less to avoid an increase in taxes that then go to someone who paid nothing. You lose motivation.

Posted by: hello | September 17, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I do wish Republican automatons would quit chanting their one and only mantra:
“CUT TAXES”
Your party has been running this country for the last 6 of 8 years, you’ve cut taxes repeatedly -
Americans have tried out your cut-taxes economic policy, if if was supposed to work, it should have worked by now.
What do we see instead? The United States economy, once the envy of the world, is in melt-down!
Give it a rest. Chanting “No new taxes” as a solution to our current economic crisis is like chanting “I will be better, I will be better” as a cure for cancer.
Both are just wishful thinking.
C’mon Republicans. You’ve wasted the nation’s time by chattering on about “lipstick on a pig”, now you want to waste more of our time by babbling on about “no new taxes”.
GET SERIOUS!

Posted by: niccolo m@chiavelli | September 17, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Wrong Lee! You’re spouting what the liberal media has been spoon feeding you. Look at how many bills have been put forth by McCain with a Dem co-sponsor.
How many has B.O. done?
Yep…but you won’t look…you’re too freaking lazy and would prefer the media to tell you who to vote for. Barbra Streisand knows what’s best for you Lee! ROFLMAO!!!!

Posted by: Wrong Lee | September 17, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Wait a second….Dem’s have controlled the purse string (Congress) and the Senate for the past couple years. I would say the present day failure rests really damned heavy on them too!

Posted by: Mark | September 17, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I’m voting republican this time (the first time ever)because I’m not a slave to any party. Like a lot of people, I work really hard. I do not believe in handouts to lazy people who sponge off the system.
Former Democrat for McCain/Palin

Posted by: Valerie | September 17, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Mark…are you retarded? sheesh i cannot believe what some people can convince themselves of . did someone hypnotize you?
please dont try that “worst congress/lowest approval rating in history” bs either , everyone who is NOT a moron or hypnotized sees the republicans dragging their feet as much as possible while king lame duck gw bush does the only thing he can…veto everything the democrats DO finally get through both houses …please shut or contribute something cogent and useful to this discussion. thanks.

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

sure , go on lady valerie. typical rich white snob arent you?

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

I think many people call Obama an elitist because he is smug and demeaning, not because he is so rich or comes from some rich family. People do not like arrogant people, period. You can be rich and not smug or arrogant. When Obama said people in small towns cling to their religion and guns becsuae of economic woes –in my opinion that was arrogant. Religion especially is a huge part of one’s identity and most likely has nothing to do with the economy. It is your own personal belief. For someone to think a person believse as they do simply becasue their town lost a factory is pretty arrogant and diminishes the person’s religious beliefs.

Posted by: arrogant | September 17, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

and personally valerie, i would rather support ANYONE but the executives at merrill lynch ,fannie mae ,freddie mac, aig, lehman bros (and soon to be many many more…)
so you are saying i guess, you would rather support a party with corporate bailout /reverse socialism high on their agenda.
wow , i bet your parents must be proud of your strong ethical backbone!!!

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Typical Liberal. No defense of B.O.’s record so you resort to your elitist name calling. Trust me, B.O. won’t make the cut….too many people understand what he’s mixing in the kool-aid.
Baa…Baaa…your screen name shows you as the sheep you are! ROFLMAO!!!

Posted by: Bah Bah... | September 17, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

its funny all we hear is Obama made all this money 66 million for the month of Aug and 11 million last night, So the MultiMillion dollar question is ….. why is Obama not beating McCain in all the polls, why isnt he wiping the floor with John McCain. Ya know Money cant buy love and it sure as heck cant buy a president hopeful….

Posted by: bete | September 17, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

“I didn’t leave the Democratic party, the Democratic party left me.”
===
When the person who has done nothing nominated by the party to be its Pres. nominee equates the accomplishments of the Clinton Administration to the disasters of the GW Bush administration, it means that party is no longer the same as 8 years ago. If the party’s nominee, for his own political, short-sighted gains in the primaries, abandoned the principles that led the country to a period of unprecedented economic prosperity and world peace, he, Zerobameus, God of Nothingness, is not worthy of support, nor is his party.

Posted by: d0 | September 17, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

I SUPPORT FOR THIS DECISION. IT IS SMART LADY. MCCAIN AND PALIN WILL MAKE THE CHANGE BETTER.

Posted by: James 770 | September 17, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

why should i defend obamas’ tiny record when i can pick apart the GIGANTIC republican screw up record of the past 50 years or so?
THE MORAL MAJORITY!!
hahaha
wonder why no ones saying that anymore? hahahah!!

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

here is the most telling evidence yet that the republicans are the party of the rich and they run everything.
show me just 5 people who are employed in the top 10% of ANY major us financial institution who are democrats…i am waiting…
any democrats in the fed?
i mean real democrats ,not lady rothschilds turncoats types.
REPUBLICANS = THE PARTY OF THE RICH ,CORPORATIONS, THE ROTHSCHILDS ,NEIL BUSH,NEWT GINGRICH, THE CONFEDERATE FLAG WAVERS, THE “MORAL MAJORITY” (AHAHAHAHHA…) THE GUN HAPPY CROSS BURNING REDNECKS…
yes that is the republican party and their rather diverse (and largely repugnant) power base.

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Ya know Money cant buy love and it sure as heck cant buy a president hopeful….
Posted by: bete | Sep 17, 2008 9:58:21 PM
—-
Really? He promised to give everyone $1000 bucks if you vote for him. His Nothingness certainly thinks and hopes to buy your votes.

Posted by: d0 | September 17, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

i think you have it all wrong bete. (big)money can do a lot more than buy a presidential hopeful, it can actually win (steal) a presidential election…just ask al gore. (or jeb bush)

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Yep, the Obamabutts are in full manure slinging competitions today. Of course, if Lady de Rothchild had come out and endorsed Obamabutt, you would be singing her praises and how gracious and beautiful and classy she is. Well, those of us who happen to agree with her, still think she is beautiful, classy, gracious, self confident, courageous, and we are behind her 100%. We have tried to tell you, there are millions of Democrats like this lady, that will not support a flawed candidate, an illigitimate candidate, and we will vote third party, or McCain. We are called PUMA’s. You have insisted to the nth degree that we are closet Republicans. Well, here is a perfect example of how wrong and blind you are. Lady Lynn did not work for the RNC. She worked with the DNC. She is just the most visible of what is an entire underground movement of women and men who feel just like she does. There is no party unity. It is Democrats against Democrats this election. Why don’t you understand that?

Posted by: jdona | September 17, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

ps. For me? I want my money first. This phony claims he initiated the “stimulus” package in the congress, which is a lie, not to mention it did nothing to prevent government bail-outs of private banks, mortgage lenders, investment firms and insurance groups, but the problem is I got Zero, his Nothingness, from that “stimulus”. I want my $1000 first before he could buy votes, and I have no interest in his empty promises.
Incidentally, if congress had the courage and followed HRC’s proposal of solving targeted problems in the financial sector and home defaults, it might, just might, have prevented these huges government bail-outs.
Zero-bama already costs tax payers nearly $1 trillion from his empty promises, you make the prediction what he will cost you if he was selected.

Posted by: d0 | September 17, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

there is no such thing as a true liberal who would vote for mccain or (ugh/shudder) palin.
vote as your conscience allows you but dont try to sugar coat it. you are not a true democrat and really never were, like lady rothschild and ronald reagan.
you just went along for the ride as long as it wasnt too uncomfortable but now that uppity black man…
right?

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

Obamatrons: when 95% of white voters support the white candidate, come talk to US about racism. Until then, if you want racism, look in your own camp, you’ve got more than enough to around.

Posted by: wheres_the_teleprompter | September 17, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

It’s clear that Rothschild is looking after her monetary interests, b/c McCain’s main concern is his self-interest in keeping his wife’s multi-millions. If she really supported Hillary, and Hillary’s ideas, she would clearly be sticking with her principles, as Hillary has very strongly said over and over again that Barack represents the same ideals as she (Hillary) does, and Hillary is campaigning her butt off to help Barack.

Posted by: Pele | September 17, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

personally ,i dont really care for obama much ,but given the choice between a lying republican and a lying democrat, i will ALWAYS VOTE DEMOCRATIC!!
democrats are far from perfect,they are after all, human , and some of them are even downright sleazy BUT compared to the republicans ,they are angels w/polished gold halos to boot!

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

A Rothschild calling Obama elitist? ROTFLMAO
She’s spewing the same rhetoric as McCain’s propaganda machine is churning out.
BTW, Obama is the author of much legislation.
Any yes, he did reach over party lines.
I’m sick and tired of these lies!

Posted by: stan | September 17, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Posted by: Mark | Sep 17, 2008 9:40:00 PM
Wait a second….Dem’s have controlled the purse string (Congress) and the Senate for the past couple years. I would say the present day failure rests really damned heavy on them too!
========
Let’s give Bonnie & Clyde the keys to the Bank!!!
========
The current crisis is the direct consequence of the deregulation of America’s financial institutions.
This is a McCain policy, this is a Republican ideology.
Remember Reagonomics?
Deregulation + cut taxes + do not cut government programs =
A growing economy, more jobs, trickle down from the rich to the poor.
=======
In fact what we have is
Reagonomics
Deregulation + reduction of taxes + do not cut government programs =
1. The U.S. taxpayer is on the hook for billions in private debt held by banks that have gone bankrupt.
2. The U.S. taxpayer is on the hook for collapsing financial institutions.
3. The U.S. taxpayer is on the hook for paying hundreds of millions in interest payments on loans taken out from foreign countries.
4. The U.S economy is in hoc to foreign governments and sovereign funds.
5. The budget is in deficit, and will remain in deficit for decades to come.
5. 40 million Americans have no health insurance
5. Real wages in sharp decline, more than 600,000 jobs lost in the last year alone, record profits for private defense contractors (Halliburton, Blackwater), record profits for private healthcare and pharma companies, record profits for oil companies
6. Gas at more than $4.00 a gallon.
And BTW: When Bush, McCain, and other Republicans took over the government from Clinton – THE AMERICAN GOVERNMENT WAS IN SURPLUS. A surplus that was to last until 2010!!!
====================
IT is the Republican party, and the Republican party alone that has driven us into this ditch.
Vote McCain/Palin?
That’s like giving Bonnie & Clyde the keys to the bank. LOL!
That’s like making Charlie Manson the prison warden.
That’s like making “Billy the Kid” the Sheriff of Dodge

Posted by: niccolo m@chiavelli | September 17, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

This is BIG BIG BIG… What does that say about Obama ?? Even members of his own party can not stand him , and not because he has fought against them like Mc Cain did in his own party , it is because he is too arogant and is empty of substance ! John Mc cain , on the other hand , got people in the Democratic party admiring him for the good work he has done for the country , not all Dems ofcourse ,but those who are centrist and NOT on the Obama Kool-Aid diet will see the value of what John has done over the year and give him the credit. People judge you by what you do , NOT by what you promise ! So , it will be a close race , with the independents decide the Race , throw in the “Braidley Effect” and the fact that John has the record and “battle scars” to prove for his standing up to the OLd Boys of the Republican party and thus earns the trust of Independents and Reagan Democrats , I said JOhn Mc Cain will win this Election by at least 5% points . this is exciting , Now , we will have a government that is not LeFT, or Right , not Democrat , not Republican BUT A CENTRIST GOVERNMENT FOR THE PEOPLE OF AMERICAN . Beside John Mc Cain , I do not know of any other candidate in America today who is able to do that much ! John Mc Cain courage for his country over the years has really paid off now ! Great GReat Great!

Posted by: alohaone | September 17, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

FINALLY! A Democrat with a brain!

Posted by: cory | September 17, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

Obamatrons: when 95% of white voters support the white candidate, come talk to US about racism. Until then, if you want racism, look in your own camp, you’ve got more than enough to around.
Posted by: wheres_the_teleprompter | Sep 17, 2008 10:24:17 PM
i would be willing to wager that in at least alaska = 1/50 of the usa ,the white voter support for the white candidate(s) might possibly exceed 95%.
probably at least 90% in utah and idaho too.
and i am so glad of your god-like choosing of the 95% highwater mark for patently racist voting, personally i would think anything more than 60% or so of the white voters voting for the white candidate would constitute clear cut voting by race, but hey what do i know…you are god-like!

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

A number of comments are again using the race card. Millions of American does not trust Obama now do we like his policies and certainly do not want him as our commander in chief as he will leave our country defenseless (yes, he will). We do not give a rats ass if he is pink, yellow, orange, purple, brown, black, white, blue or whatever color. QUIT USING THE RACE CARD, PEOPLE, YOU SOUND STUPID. GET THIS IN YOUR HEAD, WE DO NOT WANT OBAMA IN THE WHITE HOUSE AS HE WOULD BE BAAAAAAAAAAAAAD FOR THE COUNTRY. IF YOU LIBERAL DEMOCRATS WANTED TO WIN THIS RACE, YOU SHOULD HAVE NOMINATED HILLARY. YOUR PARTY SCREWED UP.
And by the way, the Texas Gulf Coast took a hugh hit with IKE; we in this country are just fortunate that the damage to the oil offshore rigs and the many, many refineries in this area has minimal damage. You need to start telling your congress person that both the E. & W. coasts need offshore drilling because the next hurricane to the Texas-Louisiana coast might be even bigger and if the oil supply from this area is really damaged, the whole United States will suffer. You need to start contributing to the oil supply NOW (technology is so advanced that it will take about 3 years not 10 as the negative-don’t-drill-off-my-shore people are stating), and also start research and development on alternative energy sources. You people on those coast drive vechiles, use public transportation, use all sorts of products which use oil, etc. and you need to start contributing to our country’s energy supply NOW. We are sending millions upon millions of dollars very frequently to obtain foreign oil to countries who are basically our country’s enemies. DO THIS NOW. YOU ARE ACTUALLY DAMAGING OUR NATION’S ECONOMY.

Posted by: loyalamerican | September 17, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Great. I’m a democrat and there is no way
I would vote for Obama. He simply can not
be trusted. He will not be good for this
country period. Yes he can give a good
speech but they are not always true, he is really good at twisting the truth around so it means something else. He talks
about change but doesn’t say what change
he means and not all change is good. The
man talks too much as says too little.
Biden is ok, but even he was not for
Obama at first.

Posted by: fwhite | September 17, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

This woman is insane if she thinks McCain has the same goals as Clinton. She is just showing her disgust in bad taste because Clinton didn’t get the nomination. John mcCain is owned lock stock and barrell by the gop and their interests. There is no way McCain is going to buck the big powers in his party if he is elected. The gop already has America in the toilet. Electing McCain will flush America down the sewer.

Posted by: con me not | September 17, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

after reading countless number of comments from Americans concerning the presidential election this year, i have concluded we are a nation of ignorance.
ignorance to knowledge and awareness of the fundamentals of our government. without these basic tools, Americans are voicing their opinions of the issues and candidates based on judgement and not fact or knowledge. if the American media was not so biased, we would have more facts to develop our beliefs for a better government for all.

Posted by: peter | September 17, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

What has the Democratic controlled Congress done? Not one darn good thing. They seem to have a high degree of voicing their displeasure with the White House, yet they are the ones who should be doing the work. They are absolutely worthless.

Posted by: loyalamerican | September 17, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

For fwhite: Obama has already said how he is going to promote change but apparently you have not been listening. It’s funny how people only hear what they want to hear!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: dewey | September 17, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

For loyalamerican:
The Democrats do not control congress although they have a slight majority. How can they pass anything for the good of this country when you have an IDIOT for president that vetoes everything just to be a pain in the rear???????????

Posted by: dewey | September 17, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

AND THEY CONTINUE TO LEAVE….AND LEAVE AND LEAVE…..WHERE ARE THE MCCAIN DESERTERS..HIS OIL MESSAGE SEEMS TO BE STEAM ROLLING THROYGH THIS COUNTRY..OBAMA BETTER GET OUT THE BIG DRILLS IF HE WANTS TO BE ELECTED..I ASSOCIATE HIM WITH HARRY RIED AND NANCY PELOSI….OBAMA REID AND PELOSI ARE ALL THE SAME…THAT IS A LOSING TICKET IN THESE TOUGH TIMES…HE NEEDS TO …………..” CHANGE”

Posted by: td | September 17, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

If the American people are stupid enough to elect Obama, this country will become socialist, new communistic. Then again, we’ll have friends like Cuba, Iran, the Saudis will like us, etc., and maybe we can get cheap oil from them. Of course we’ll still have our problems with communist China and all their poison foods, etc., but perhaps Russia will like us better and give us cheap oil. Of course we will have to pull out of NATO and our military will be decreased drastically and our defense of our country will go to hell but if all those countries previously mentioned like us because we have become more like them, we won’t have to worry about being attacked by them or the terrorist. WAIT, what about South America, will the man in Venezuela and his friends like us then?

Posted by: John McDonald | September 17, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

OBAMA…REID….PELOSI…ALL THE SAME….THEY ARE AGAINST GETTIN OIL AND NATURAL GAS IN PLAY IN AMERICA….THEY ARE FOR CHANGING AMERICA…GOOD LUK

Posted by: TD | September 17, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

i repeat: NO REAL LIBERAL DEMOCRAT WOULD VOTE MCCAIN PALIN. for ANY reason!!!
thats always been the problem with the democratic party , there are always too many voters who vote democratic until it is a little too uncomfortable for them , then they jump ship as soon as there is a republican who is more centrist/comfortable.
bill or hillary clinton would be ok but , now that uppity black man…
thats it isnt it?
voting republican is like cutting off your nose to spite your face,stupid and moronic.
all the facts point towards disaster when republicans are at the helm ,their record is disturbingly dangerously inept ,simplistic and mostly all about keep their money safe and sound and growing at all costs, even at the nations’ very health ,as the current republican brewed financial meltdown is a perfect example of .
like i said earlier , vote as your conscience allows but dont try to sugar coat it.
and please quit calling yourself a democrat today please.thanks and we dont need you, the democratic political party will do fine without you and lady rothschild .

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

For all of you playing the race card again, the Democratic Party chairman did say that the “White Party” in one of his speeches a few weeks ago. He did later in the speech correct himself and say “Republican Party”.
So does that mean that all the white people belong to the Republican Party and all other races belong to some other party? He did not clarify himself. I am confused as some of my in laws and friends are not white and I know they are Republicans. Should I tell them they are in the wrong party?

Posted by: June Jaminson | September 17, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

NO OIL…NO OBAMA…NO REID….NO PELOSI…( THEY ARE THE SAME )…THAT’S WHY I CHANGED TO REPUB….NEVER VOTED FOR ONE IN MY LIFE…WILL VOTE STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN THIS TIME AND PROBABLY FROM NOW ON…DEMS HAVE TURNED INTO SELF SERVING LIERS…DAMAGING THIS COUNTRY…BYE DEMOCRATS….ITS BEEN GREAT

Posted by: TD | September 17, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

She is intitled to her opinion.If this is how she feels than she needs to go with it.
I am more concerned with the problem in Michigan. Republicans trying to supress the votes of recently foreclosed on individuals. These are the very people who need to be heard.
This Repulican/Democrat thing is completely out of control. It needs to be about the people not the party.

Posted by: plh | September 17, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

“that uppity black man…”
thats it isnt it? admit it then you can breath again…
ah there, doesnt the truth set you free?

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Let’s get this straignt now.
Millions of Americans are going to vote for McCain & Palin and not for Obama & Biden because we love our country and know that if Obama is elected he will destroy our way of live. He is a socialist, near communist, there is no question about that. He has altered his positions on issues just to get votes but he will change back if elected.
WE LOVE AMERICA AND KNOW THAT OBAMA WOULD BE A HORRIBLE COMMANDER IN CHIEF AND WOULD PUT OUR NATION IN GRAVE DANGER WITH HIS OPINIONS OF DECREASING THE MILITARY AND OUR DEFENSE SYSTEMS. HE HAS SINCE SOFTENEING HIS VIEWS OF THIS BUT IN HIS SPEECH A YEARS AGO, HE WAS VERY DEFINITE ABOUT WHAT HE WOULD DO TO OUR MILITARY AND OUR DEFENSE. DO NOT LET THIS MAN FOOL YOU. HE IS BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD

Posted by: Edward Henderson | September 17, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

“and i am so glad of your god-like choosing of the 95% highwater mark for patently racist voting, personally i would think anything more than 60% or so of the white voters voting for the white candidate would constitute clear cut voting by race, but hey what do i know…you are god-like!”
Nah, but I know Obama is not getting 95% of the black vote (I should say 95% of the black vote as measured by pollsters — the actual number could be even higher given the known issues with polling) based on his competency or mastery of the issues. I don’t think anyone needs “God-like” abilities to piece together the obvious race allegiances in this election.
I don’t know what percentage of the M-P vote is race-based. I do know that race-based voting for Obama is significant enough that Obama supporters would be better off avoiding claims of racism against their candidate. It’s ridiculous and hypocritical to complain about racism when there are such stark race problems on your own side.

Posted by: wheres_the_teleprompter | September 17, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

no June, but you should let them know they are stupid sometime, in a nice kind of way…

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

yeah 95% vs 5% sounds about like the division between the wealthy and the poor ,and given that the large majority of blacks are not in that elite 5% ,i could see perfectly why they would not be voting for mccain .
if it was hillary or any democrat they would be voting 95% for them too ,LIKE THEY ALWAYS HAVE!!!
what a moron…

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Lynn Forester de Rothschild speaks for me!!!!
It’s exactly how I feel, and I have been a democrat all my life! I will be voting McCain-Palin!!!
Very exciting news, she will definitely make a lot of democrats feel comfortable switching, especially Hillary supporters because we know how hard she campaigned for Hillary.
PUMA!

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 17, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

“i would be willing to wager that in at least alaska = 1/50 of the usa ,the white voter support for the white candidate(s) might possibly exceed 95%.
probably at least 90% in utah and idaho too.”
Oh, and — Alaska is not 1/50th of the USA. The population is less than 700,000, 1/3 of Houston’s. Utah has a few hundred thousand more than Houston.
I don’t know what Alaska’s white support for Palin is, but it’s her home state, so I doubt the numbers there typify anything. As for Utah, if you have numbers showing 90% white support feel free to post them.
In any case, the ridiculous level of black Obama support is nationwide, not regional. It’s not isolated to any particular area.
The point I’m making, in three words, is “pot, kettle, black.”

Posted by: wheres_the_teleprompter | September 17, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

puma = “oh that uppity black man and his uppity wife…”
pathetic

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

I can see by all the intelligent (lol) anti Obama posts why this country is now in the toilet. It’s because of you very people that we are in this mess. You must all be very proud as you rant and rave your right winged theories as America flounders. You not only elected the worlds most inept president not once! but TWICE!! You must be very proud of your stupidity. .

Posted by: McSame McPain | September 17, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

actually alaska is the biggest state isnt it? anyway, you keep on thinking those deep thoughts mr stuart smalley.

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Obama could drown in money and still would not change the fact that he is a low life scum bag elitist sexist racist no experienced ego maniac that would destroy America. Only he knows what is good for us only he has been sent down from the mountain to save us only he has the Hollywood brand of approval. If he had three times the money he has to quote his own words “You can put lipstick on a pig but it is still a pig”

Posted by: William Johnson | September 17, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

“he is a low life scum bag elitist sexist racist no experienced ego maniac that would destroy America.”
nice to see all that empirical evidence you have to support your assertions and all of it without the monotonous republican drumbeat…NOT!
you MIGHT try decaf…or a good psychologist.

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Alaska is largest in area not in population.
Lipstick on a pig comment refering to Palin – if the PORK fits then—

Posted by: plh | September 17, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

“oh that uppity black man and his uppity wife…
and
“i am voting for anyone but that uppity black man and his uppity black wife…”
nice logical reasons to vote for an obvious loser,ie; he is white and the other candidate is that “uppity black man and his uppity black wife…”
why dont you just write in a vote for your dog or cat? that way you dont vote for “that uppity black man and his uppity black wife” but you dont screw up the country for the rest of us for the next 4 years…ok??

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

plh ,thanks bud for that bit of hard to find knowlege..did you just google that or what?
moron…

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

just so you know…
alaska is MORE than 1/50 of the usa ,geographically speaking. a lot more.
also, alaska represents 1 star on the flag out of 50. last time i went to school that was 1/50.
you are morons…

Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Lynn Rotschild is smart not to support Obama. The Democratic Party has stolen the Presidency from Hillary to crown the neophyte oaf even if this man has nothing to offer other than his arrogance and questionable associations. Like Rothschild, I am a lifelong Democrat but I am going all out for McCain who is an Honorable Man unlike Obama who is untrustworthy. He’s a Manchurian Candidate, if you know what I mean!

Posted by: Swissdiver | September 17, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

How come when someone like Liebermann or this lady are branded as traitors because they exercise their right to support the candidate of their choice?
How come when someone like Sen. McCain actually worked closely with members of the other party to achieve a common goal he was castigated for not being ‘conservative enough’?
Oh the horror of it all!!!

Posted by: Grand Old Party | September 17, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

PUMA!!!!!!!!!!!PUMA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NO OBAMA!!!!!!!!!!!!PUMA!!!!!!!!!!!!
MCCAIN-PALIN ’08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Troy | September 18, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Rothschild said of Obama to CNN in July, “frankly I don’t like him. I feel like he is an elitist.
Codeword for “He is black, and I can’t tolerate a black man being president.
Enough said.
Posted by: DownSouth | Sep 17, 2008 7:12:49 PM
more like “He is black and i cant tolerate a liberal uppity black man making government tax policy and agenda that i actually will have to live by as a loyal democrat.”

Posted by: bah | September 18, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

yeah all these “life long democrats ” defecting on this board ,you dont fool me!!
you all spell like REPUBLICANS!
Bwahahah!!!

Posted by: bah | September 18, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Did we know before today there are designer pointy hooded robes made just for ludicrously wealthy cotillion queens who are not just ‘Rothschilds,’ but OF Rothschilds.
Face it, Lynn de Snootie, sweetie, you’re a racist. You don’t like Obama because he’s black. You can say it. Gerry did. How many castles did I read that you and your hubby own again?
She’s suggesting if she votes for Obama, she’ll actually have to lower yourself to the level of a black man. And lawd knows, deys not be civilized like us uppa crusties.
Money doesn’t buy you a heart. It sure didn’t buy that de Rot-Child chick any class.

Posted by: kravitz | September 18, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

ask anyone like lady rothschild which black male politician she WOULD consider voting for for president (charlie rangel??hehe )…ans= 0
her proposed excuse is lame and obviously superficial ; her “defection” (she was never a real democrat anyway,just a “fair weather” democrat) had nothing to do with any “elitism” ,perceived or otherwise ,shes clearly the elitist among the two.
no, she just couldnt stand the idea of that uppity black man and his uppity black wife lounging around in the oval office…
admit it ,then you can breath again…
you people are pathetic and i will do my best to get obama elected . i was a hillary supporter but i will NEVER vote for someone like mccain who is OBVIOUSLY THE WORST OF THE TWO CANDIDATES ,JUST BY HIS PARTY AFFILIATION ALONE!!!!!! LOOK AT THE REPUBLICAN RECORD OVER THE LAST 50 YEARS!!!! THEY HAVE RUINED THIS COUNTRY, ECONOMICALLY AND OUR INTERNATIONAL PRESTIGE HAS NEVER BEEN LOWER!!!!!!WAKE UP!!!!!WHAT IS YOUR LOGIC??? WHERE ARE YOUR FACTS??? LOSE THE HYPERBOLE AND RHETORIC AND EXPLAIN YOUR REPUBLICAN VOTE!!! YOU HAVE NO REASONABLE EXPLANATION UNLESS YOU MAKE OVER $100,000 OR MORE A YEAR…UNLESS OF COURSE YOU CLAIM STUPIDITY ,THEN YOU ARE OFF THE HOOK!!!

Posted by: bah | September 18, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Congratulations to Lynn and Joe Lieberman!
While it is difficult to find “the truth” from the media, a few things are clear…
Character
Judgement
Record
Issues
McCain and Palin win on all 4!

Posted by: Debbie | September 18, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Although she is a democrat she believes
Senator McCain will be a much better
president and she is entitled to her opinion. American politics has become so negative that first we are split red or blue states and since that’s not enough we demean and tear each other down. George Bush had very little experience before becoming president and where are we today?. We need leaders who will rule from the center and reach out to all Americans regardless of ideology thats the only way we can rebuild America but the constant finger pointing and bereating of each other isn’t going to get us far.

Posted by: Michelle | September 18, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

last post ,then im out. just to let you know , i am white, 48, male and have lived in the south all my life, have a degree in the school of hard knocks (+ some college learning,just enough to make me slightly dangerous)
anyway , i am at the store the other day,and i hear the ubiquitous redneck talking about how, if obama was elected, all the white folks would be “pickin cotton in alabama fo massa obama”…
(i didnt bother to tell the guy he MIGHT be better off pickin cotton , judging by the 1972 pinto he was driving and the tattered dirty clothes he was wearing…) anyway….
thats my point, this guy actually would DEFINITELY do better financially under ANY democratic president ,black orange or purple ,but his home grown ignorance plus his negro phobic attitude wont let him help himself. sound familiar??
americans,listen. this man obama cannot possibly do any more damage in 4 years that can be undone in 4 years…give him a chance to do something different, this country is going in a very dangerous direction economically (and militarily as well.)
if you cant vote for obama in good conscience then at least write in your cat or dog or whoever and dont screw the country up for 4 more years with a vote for a money grubbing republican and his air headed female protege. FOR ANY REASON THATS JUST WRONG!!!

Posted by: bah | September 18, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Lynn Forester de Rothchild married Sir Evelyn de Rothchild 8 years ago. She says in her British Vogue (July 08) interview “ I came from a very claustrophobic, typical suburban American town and I just couldn’t wait to get out of there”. Obama is the elitist? “She (Lynn) was adamant that her hairdresser Vincent Roppatte be flown in from New York for this Vogue shoot. And, indeed, the date of the shoot has to be moved to accommodate him-so he doesn’t miss his slot doing Diane Sawyer’s hair for Good Morning America.”
In this same July 08 Vogue interview, it states that “in diplomatic circles in London are buzzing with the perfectly reasonable idea that were she to become President, Hillary Clinton would reward her close friend and fundraiser with the post of American Ambassador in London.
Is that the reason Mrs. de Rothchild has made the leap from Democrat to Republican in one fell swoop? Hillary is no longer in the position to offer Mrs. Rothchild the role of American Ambassador in London. Ergo, if I can’t now get the Ambassadorship from Hillary, I can certainly get one from John McCain (if he wins). Since Mrs. Rothchild who is said to be worth $100 million pounds on her own without her husband’s money… and she has everything of a material nature any human being could possibly want… what would make life perfect for her in her home town of London? She wants the American Ambassadorship in London… Gotcha Lynn!!!!

Posted by: anghiari | September 18, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

The true is that lady is worried that more elitists,Black, Hispanic, Asian etc, could be part of the White Group in charge of our country.

Posted by: leo | September 18, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Lynn Forester de Rothchild married Sir Evelyn de Rothchild 8 years ago. She says in her British Vogue (July 08) interview “ I came from a very claustrophobic, typical suburban American town and I just couldn’t wait to get out of there”. Obama is the elitist? “She (Lynn) was adamant that her hairdresser Vincent Roppatte be flown in from New York for this Vogue shoot. And, indeed, the date of the shoot has to be moved to accommodate him-so he doesn’t miss his slot doing Diane Sawyer’s hair for Good Morning America.”
In this same July 08 Vogue interview, it states that “in diplomatic circles in London are buzzing with the perfectly reasonable idea that were she to become President, Hillary Clinton would reward her close friend and fundraiser with the post of American Ambassador in London.
Is that the reason Mrs. de Rothchild has made the leap from Democrat to Republican in one fell swoop? Hillary is no longer in the position to offer Mrs. Rothchild the role of American Ambassador in London. Ergo, if I can’t now get the Ambassadorship from Hillary, I can certainly get one from John McCain (if he wins). Since Mrs. Rothchild who is said to be worth $100 million pounds on her own without her husband’s money… and she has everything of a material nature any human being could possibly want… what would make life perfect for her in her home town of London? She wants the American Ambassadorship in London… Gotcha Lynn!!!!

Posted by: anghiari | September 18, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

I used to like the Dem, but now I’m getting scared to witness the Liberal Dem are too extreme toward Socialism or Communism.
Another thing these radical extremists always used race card against anyone who supports McCain, but none of them have ever said about Michelle. Michelle is very nasty and racist when listen to her comments. Unbelievable.
McCain/Palin/08

Posted by: Beatrice | September 18, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Hillary is closer to the moderate view of McCain. She was in favor of the Iraq war. She govern by going to the middle. She believe in choice, however diagree in abortion. Both men and women are not monolith with issues. We range from extreme liberal to extreme conservative. Mrs. De Rotchild is not extreme liberal. Either extremities are minority in our society, I hope. Plus, Obama is closer to the extreme. He does not believe in equal pay for men and women. If he was, then why does his female staff are paid less. IF De rotchild is elitist, then she would know one when she sees him. Obama has big head and ears. He comes off self-centered. McCain is a good leader. He is someone that can be trusted.

Posted by: yodaxl7 | September 18, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Notice that she uses “I feel”? This woman is choosing who she supports base on who she likes; not who is right.
McCain and Palin has vouch to reverse Roe versus Wade and she thinks pro-choice is going to be okay since it was under Bush? Bush didn’t vouch to reverse Roe versus Wade… now, it’s means that either she think McCain is a liar and will not carry out his promise or she is stupid. Either way, she is stupid…
Rothschild is another example of a woman who decides emotionally rather than logically. Palin is another for her records in trooper-gate.

Posted by: DNick | September 18, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

I agree, I used to think that the “Right to Life” groups were wacko, but the Democrats for Obama are putting them to shame. Such nastiness, what are you so afraid of. Why are you jumping on this poor lady for supporting who she thinks will be the best man to lead our country? Each person is entitled to their opinion, oh wait I forgot the wealthy shouldn’t have an opinion unless it involves a positive one towards Obama. He was hanging out with the Hollywood elite last night with his hand out for donations. Each candidate needs financial backing and campaign help. Don’t get so excited, we will know in November who our citizens think is the best man for the job, in the mean time you should try to be more civil because after the dust settles, remember that we are all Americans.

Posted by: Anne M | September 18, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

I hope Lynn likes having the unknown, unqualified, but “pretty cool” Sarah Palin as president, if so blessed to make it into the white house. That is who the Republicans want in there anyway! If JM doesn’t survive they will get their puppet president. LR will wish she had her so called elitist Barack Obama in there, at the very least, to understand issues enough to discuss beyond the usual simple sound bites.

Posted by: MJ | September 18, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

What makes you think that McCain is going to die, his mother is still alive and very spry at 96. He comes from very good genes.

Posted by: Anne M | September 18, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Palin may not know what Bush doctrine/policy is but facts are showing that Mcain/palin are following Bush ideology and interesting they share many common things with radicalism views such as Al-quida Here is common things I have found so far They are claiming they are the one from God doing Gods tasks to clean up demons on earth.They have black &white view of world , they say either you are with us or against us.They do not like other religions and believe their religion is the only one.They have zero tolerance to opposition, enemy should be crushed to death no talk/diplomacy with enemy.They believe they are always right, never admit their mistakes and be sorry about their mistakes.They act fist then think after , they like preemptive actions without calculating outcomes.They are selfish and ignoring and rejects facts against them.They Believe in today’s problems only and do not care about future crisis.They scare people to support them by claiming they are the only one can protect them.They do not believe in avoiding disaster by ignoring them first until becomes tool late to take action.They desperate in crisis and say you are on your own first, They are over confidence about their knowledge about issues and ignore other’s thoughts. They like power very much and do whatever it takes to get it.They blame enemy for every problem.Wake up America, We had 8 years of failed Bush policy ,As old dogs never learn new things do not be fooled by MCain after 27 years in Washington and Voting 95% with Bush all of sudden wants to bring change. enough is enough.

Posted by: No MCcain | September 18, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

DNick,
It is not a matter of right or wrong. It is a matter of experience, decision making ability and leadership. McCain’s political record proves he is qualified. Obama has not held any official leadership positions yet.

Posted by: Anne M | September 18, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

DNick…..50% of Americans vote on emotion…men and women chose who they “feel” is deserving of the keys to the WH. Most of us already know who we are voting for…only about 12% need to see those debates, tho I’m guessing the 85% of us who know who we’re voting for will watch too, and root for our team.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN before he picked PALIN.

Posted by: Emma | September 18, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

I agree with Rhys and I too am disappointed by Hillary Clinton’s abject surrender to the sexist Dean-Pelosi-Obama cabal.
I hoped for more from her and am deeply disappointed.
McCain-Palin 08

Posted by: fob | September 18, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am

I saw her on CNN today (quite a surprise!), and she came across as extremely smart and thoughtful. Well, I, myself, made a modest five contributions totaling $350 to Hillary’s campaign, but I wholeheartedly join Ms. Forester de Rothschild in her support of John McCain!!
As for 2012, Hillary and Jim Webb would be absolutely smashing!!

Posted by: Scott | September 18, 2008, 3:33 am 3:33 am

I was a dedicated Hillary supporter, donor and volunteer. Unlike Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, I could never, never vote McCain-Palin and am working actively for the election of Obama-Biden. The policy differences between Obama and HRC were razor-thin. The policy differences between Obama and McCain are a deep and wide chasm. McCain-Palin stand for nothing Senator Clinton proposed. Any former HRC supporter who votes McCain-Palin has to have been a star struck Hillary groupie, because sincere Clinton supporters would never vote for McCain-Palin. Issues such as the war in Iraq, the economy, comprehensive health care, alternative energy, reproductive rights are issues Obama-Biden offer a comprehensive plan that closely matches Senator Clinton’s. Worst of all, a sincere Hillary supporter could never support a ticket where a woman like Palin has been brought to the ticket to merely appease and unite the Republican social conservatives and “ditto heads” behind McCain whom they had little enthusiasm. McCain added Palin to his ticket as window dressing when, in fact, he really wanted Joe Lieberman. After 1 meeting and a 15 minute phone call, McCain selected Palin in order to exploit the lingering Obama-Hillary tensions. This selection is an insult to both liberal and moderate women. How could a former Hillary supporter embrace an unqualified social conservative who last March at the Women and Leadership event in Los Angeles asserted from the stage she didn’t like Hillary’s whining? What a comment!! Unlike Lady Lynn, many other well-heeled “Hillraisers” and close HRC friends have graciously embraced Obama: New York attorney, Bal Das; Philadelphia Eagles’ co owner, Christina Lurie, Esprit founder, Jill Iscol. Lady Sarah’s attempt to grab the media spotlight at a special press conference is particularly pathetic. In this time of serious economic crises when people are losing jobs, homes and savings I am not sure McCain’s decision to spotlight megabucks Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild as a campaign spokesperson is the wisest decision.

Posted by: Marcee | September 18, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am

Funny how Obama supporters cite raising more money as a virtue for their candidate. He opted out of public financing after promising he would accept it. And he still claims the “change” platform. Same old union-backed democratic party. Trouble is, Obama has NO firm positions. Americans are not so stupid to believe and elect this zero-experience elitist.

Posted by: Rob | September 18, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am

I too was disapponted about Senator Clinton’s loss, but you could never get me to vote for John McCain. Now that he has added this substandard excuse for a VP, Sarah Palin, I have even less respect for the man. What an insult to Hillary supporters who valued her smarts and experience. Did you hear Palin answer the Town Hall question about her foreign policy experience? My mouth was hanging open as she talked. Unbelievable! Also, could someone please explain to me what happened to the letter “G” in Palin’s speaking? She has created an entirely new language missing the final “G” at the end of her words: goin, walkin, doin,wantin,belivin,thinkin. I expect more from my candidates and Lady Lynn can gladly have McCain-Palin. I’ll happily vote Obama-Biden who are vigorous, smart and have a plan of action on all the critical issues I am concerned about.

Posted by: politicallysavvy | September 18, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

Well, she apparently does not care about the issues, including the issues that Hillary cares about. She will fit right in with the McCain campaign. The McCain campaign needs another top female surrogate after Carly Fiorina threw McCain and Palin under the bus by saying that McCain and Palin cannot run a Fortune 500 company. I can understand if a campaign advocate like her says something like this about the opposition, but saying this about your own candidates? If McCain and Palin cannot run a business, how can they run the biggest economy in the world, the United States?

Posted by: tony | September 18, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

As a loyal Clinton supporter I wish Hillary would have been our choice but this is going to set up what is going to be an interesting match in 2012 Clinton/Palin, and as a loyal democrat im getting the feeling that my party is leaving us conservative dems behind we would be talking about a super majority right now, but no we have to make history now, Im voting for Obama but damn if we arent screwing it up. 2010 midterms will teach us dems a lesson in coalition building because the 500 million dollar man has drained our coffers and the DNC will be broke and when we finally get to a recession which is two quarters of negative growth we wont have any money for our candidates of the future. now liberals talk about how the GOP leaves on our own, funny we are not investing in the future of the party and thinking about the now, so democrats of the future your on own in raising money and networking because the DNC will be broke mid 2009 so much for plan 50 state plan Gov Dean envisioned.

Posted by: Quintell | September 18, 2008, 5:22 am 5:22 am

He is not an ideologue and he is not beholden to special interests.
Conspiracy with the special interests that he is now attacking apparently. That’s good point.

Posted by: Steve | September 18, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am

When Obama first erupted onto the national scene I watched him with interest. During the primaries, I discovered two sides of Obama. His public image and his private image. I thought his behavior in the primaries was immature and that it contradicted his message. I believe that Obama has not shown the american people any of his core values that shape his political decisions. Further, I believe that if he did he would have to admit he was a socialist. I think as far as the economy is concerned, his immature behavior is hurting a suffering economy. Bad news for america.

Posted by: ubu2008 | September 18, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

And the left right paradigm continues.
Wake up America, niether of these canidates are good for this world.

Posted by: Doug | September 18, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Hey, Obamanuts don’t sink more your face by adding more sour grapes which are desperate moves. Just accept the fact that Obama is can not win .. no one with rational mind will trust him nor vote for him except people like you.

Posted by: darnobama | September 18, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

I agree with her completely. Under President Bush abortion remained a legal option and for me abortion is not the central issue in this election at all.
The economy, national security, energy and other more issues concern me and John McCain and Sarah Palin will be able to make the difference in Washington we need.
They are the change we need, not Obama who is too afraid to select a woman as his running mate.
I admire Ms. Rothschild for having the foresight and conviction to speak out for our country.
Also Donald Trump has just endorsed McCain.
Mr. Trump is also a Hillary supporter.
I am voting for McCsin/Palin, a vote for real change!

Posted by: Debbie | September 18, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

It is no surpise to me that Obama’s house of cards is beginning to tumble down. I expected it would happen around this time long ago. Top Democrat Lynn Forester de Rothschild’s defection is not the only defection, but certainly the biggest name so far amongst Democrats. Her endorsement of John McCain on Wednesday is predicated on a sound decision and she certainly knows who has the experience to lead this country. That man is John McCain of course. Ms. de Rothschild gave us a bit of Ronald Reagan also by saying..”I didn’t leave the Democratic party, the Democratic party left me.” Kudos to Lynn Forester de Rotcschild!!

Posted by: Al MacLeod | September 18, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

The most significant reason she gave is that Obama is too far left…..and from the posts from Obama supporters I can see she knows what she is talking about.
She supported Hillary because she is more “central” in her thinking.

Posted by: Andie | September 18, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Oh no!! There goes 100,000 dollars what in the world will Obama do?
Oh well we’ll just have to wait for the Colin Powell endorsement after the debates.

Posted by: Old news supporting old man | September 18, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

I can understand now why Lynn Forester
went from Hillary to McCain.This woman would vote for anyone that has a woman on the ticket.It doesn’t bother her that Hillary and Palin’s views are totally different.Bottom Line McCain has a woman on the ticket.Lynn could care less about the Roe V Wade and that McCain could take it back 50-60 yrs.
This woman can travel from America to England.Throughout his career in the Senate, John McCain has had a record of joining with the Bush Administration to take away women’s rights and reproductive healthcare options. At a forum in August, he pledged that “I will be a pro-life president and this presidency will have pro-life policies.” And now, he has nominated anti-choice advocate Sarah Palin to be his running-mate.
Together, this would be the most anti-choice presidential campaign ever. Senator McCain and Governor Palin support:
A ban on abortion with no exceptions for rape or incest.
Throughout his service in the Senate, McCain has also repeatedly voted to slash funding for low-income family-planning programs, against allowing women to obtain birth control and to take away women’s right to choose.

Posted by: Judith | September 18, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I guess everyone on here doesn’t care…ha ha that is why they are commenting. Sort of says it all and yes other Democrats are going to follow suit.

Posted by: dkihnley | September 18, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild is an ardent Hillary Rodham Clinton supporter who raised scads of money for the New York senator’s failed presidential campaign. She and her husband, Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild of the prominent Rothschild banking family of England.
How can anyone like this call Sen. Obama an elitist. She lives on two continents with her Sir Duke husband (and don’t dare call her Ms.) she’s Lady Rothschild. This is beyond lunacy, it’s like George Bush calling John Kerry a draft-dodger.
She’s just feels insulted that her rich a** won’t be able to influence an Obama administration. Talk about elitism, she is practically part of the British Royal family, and wants America to adopt the same hiearchy. McBush/Clinton

Posted by: Dean N | September 18, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Lynn Forester de Rothschild calling Obama an “elitist” is the same as southern folk calling him “uppity”. Yes, there are white people of either end of the economic scales that cannot fathom an educated, articulate, driven black man. Both words are code by racists from different economic strata. Seriously, after 8 years of Bush, wouldnt you want to have a president that looks good, sounds good, connects and inspires people not only in the US but throughout the world? Aren’t you all ready for the big American comeback?

Posted by: Ciroc | September 18, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

This is really hilarious. The Rothschilds are billionaires and their calling OBAMA an elitist? Another rich, white person defects to the Republicans, is this surprising?

Posted by: tuhle | September 18, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

If you’re a Democrat and endorse McCain then you have left the party. Be a man and say so! You are now either a Republican or an Independent….not a Democrat. He is in denial.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 18, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Why do billionaires like Rothschilds call people who have much less money than they do elitists? Is it because billionaires are severely outnumbered by non-billionaires and can get outvoted in a democracy like ours?

Posted by: anthony | September 18, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

The reason white women aren’t voting for Obama en masse like he thought they would is this: they researched his anti-white experience. They looked into the faces of their children and asked themselves why their child should be made to atone for something their children had no part in. White women unite. Our children are not responsible for the plight of black people. When Democrats can get off his path, maybe white women will go back. Until then: Vote McCain/Palin 08.

Posted by: Kitty | September 18, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Anthony — you are a moron.

Posted by: Ciroc | September 18, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Sorry anthony, — I meant to say Kitty is a moron. There is a collective responsibility to right the wrongs of this country’s past.

Posted by: Ciroc | September 18, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Elitest is a Code word? So when I called Kerry and his wife Elitests in 2004, I was letting the public know they were black?
Come on…grow up!

Posted by: CodeWordsRJokes | September 18, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

I find it interesting that, with the exception of CNN, ABC News and other outlets fail to mention Obama’s endorsement by prominent Republican Susan Eisenhower. Eisenhower is the granddaughter of Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower. Among her many accomplishments, she is known as an expert on the former Soviet Union and in the energy field. She serves as Chairman of the Eisenhower Institute’s Leadership and Public Policy Programs. It is her belief Democrat Obama–not fellow Republican McCain–has the skills and temperment needed to meet the many challanges our country faces, here at home and abroad.

Posted by: eyesopen | September 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Remember this article from the NY TIMES? (how quickly we forget…)
In 1999, Barack Obama was faced with a difficult vote in the Illinois legislature — to support a bill that would let some juveniles be tried as adults, a position that risked drawing fire from African-Americans, or to oppose it, possibly undermining his image as a tough-on-crime moderate.
In the end, Obama chose neither to vote for nor against the bill. He voted “present,” effectively sidestepping the issue, an option he invoked nearly 130 times as a state senator.
Sometimes the “present’ votes were in line with instructions from Democratic leaders or because he objected to provisions in bills that he might otherwise support. At other times, Obama voted present on questions that had overwhelming bipartisan support. In at least a few cases, the issue was politically sensitive.
The record has become an issue on the presidential campaign trail, as Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, his chief rival for the Democratic nomination, has seized on the present votes he cast on a series of anti-abortion bills to portray Obama as a “talker” rather than a “doer.”

Posted by: fyi2009 | September 18, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

dl – you either are unaware, or have forgotten that the Alaksa Legislative Council–made up of 8 REPUBLICANS and 4 Democrates–voted unanimously to open the Troopergate investigation, and approved chairperson Hollis French (D), selection of Steven Branchwater as the independant outside investigator.

Posted by: eyesopen | September 18, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

I can’t believe that millions of average Americans pay Barack to hear what he has to SAY, while the economy goes to hell in a handbasket, and it doesn’t cost anything to google him and see what he has (or has not) DONE!

Posted by: fyi2009 | September 18, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

“Niko_in_Oakland,” thanks for summing this up. I greatly respect your analysis. McCain/Palin ’08!

Posted by: mlc | September 18, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

I WOULD LIKE TO SAY I AM 61 YEARS OLD.
I HAVE NEVER VOTED FOR ANYONE.
BUT , I WILL MAKE SURE THAT I VOTE THIS YEAR.
I DO NOT WANT TO SEE OBAMA IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
NOT IN MY LIFE TIME….
PLEASE OPEN YOUR EYES,HE IS FOR CHANGE… RIGHT ! BUT YOU WON’T LIKE THE CHANGE YOU’RE GETTING…
TIGERS DON’T CHANGE THEIR STRIPES.EVER..
AND YOU CAN PUT LIPSTICK ON A MUSLIM.
AND THE MUSLIM WILL STILL BE A PIG AND A MUSLIM….

Posted by: JIMMY | September 18, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Has anyone out there read “Faith of our Fathers”? What a dynamic book about the McCain men who have served this nation proudly for several generations. Mrs. Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t proud of our America until her hubby got nominated last month and what have the Obamas sacrificed and given to this nation? Nothing. He changed the US Flag to the Flag-over-Obama on his own private little jet. No way should anyone vote for this egotist and unAmerican wife. What a disgrace these two are.

Posted by: JP | September 18, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I agree with Lynn – She is doing the right thing and personally, I admire the fact that she had the personal will power to follow what she feels is the right path. I applaud and join her in supporting McCain/Palin. Anyone who thinks that BO has this locked up is SERIOUSLY mistaken. BO has taken Hillary and her supporters for granted for WAAAAAAY to long. His arrogance alone is what will do him in. Cut to “the clouds and seas parting” for BO. I can tell you that, that delusion will be a reality check for him when he has to unpack his bags and head back to Chicago after the general.
GO P.U.M.A.’s!

Posted by: Michael | September 19, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

She represents millions of women out there that are disenchanted with the democratic party who will be voting for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Maria | September 20, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

hillary12

Posted by: Randy | September 20, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

The truth hurts and she speaks the truth. Be smart, not emotional and put country first.

Posted by: susan | September 21, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

To all hillary supporters she will never be president because if B.O. loses his suporters will not vote for her…much like her supporters don’t want to support Him. I hope Everyone does what they makes them feel good

Posted by: miz | September 22, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

My friends, what we have here is truly someone who refuses to admit that they’re a bigot and a racist. I mean, look at it…the Obamas have only recently made their first million, since their book was published. As such, they recently paid off school loans (last year). And get this, the only car registered in their name is a Ford hybrid Escape. McCain has 13 registered vehicles (two foreign). I would like to know what is registered to the Rothschild person. In truth, we should feel sorry for her. Very rarely do we see extremely wealthy people who are in touch with reality. Put her in teh life of an average family and should would not know how to survive. Hopefully she finds religion and love before leaving this life…

Posted by: Joe Truth | September 22, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.