Dem: Not Having Abortion Is Palin’s ‘Primary Qualification’
ABC News’ Teddy Davis, Bret Hovell, and Arnab Datta report: A Democratic Party leader said Wednesday that Sarah Palin’s "primary qualification" for the vice presidency is that she has not had an abortion, prompting Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to charge that Democrats are trying to "demean" the governor of Alaska and "wipe out" all of her accomplishments because she "disagrees with the NARAL crowd on one issue."
"Our Democratic colleagues are, quite frankly, in a meltdown," said Graham, referring to comments that South Carolina Democratic Party chairwoman Carol Fowler made to Politico. "I hope that [Sen. Obama] will take this opportunity to step out and get this campaign back on track, and reject this really outrageous, demeaning statement to someone who has accomplished a lot in her life other than not having an abortion."
Fowler did not dispute the accuracy of the Politico report. She responded to the uproar caused by her remarks by issuing a paper statement apologizing to anyone who was offended by her comments. Fowler said she was "clumsily" trying to make a point about single-issue voters.
"I personally admire and respect the difficult choices that women make every day, and I apologize to anyone who finds my comment offensive," said Fowler in her statement. "I clumsily was making a point about people in South Carolina who may vote based on a single issue. Whether it’s the environment, the economy, the war, or a woman’s right to choose, there are people who will cast their vote based on a single issue. That was the only point I was attempting to make."
Graham made his comments on a conference call arranged by the McCain campaign. He was joined on the call with reporters by Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., who sought to portray Fowler’s comments as fitting into a broader pattern of sexism.
"What we are seeing is a pattern that has come into play," said Blackburn. "You can go back to the remark that Sen. Obama made to a reporter back during the primary, claiming she was referred to as ‘sweetie.’ And then, moving forward, he passed over Sen. Clinton, and many feel like he also passed over Gov. Sebelius, both as running mates, and then the lipstick comment that he made yesterday."
Obama spokesman Nick Shapiro responded to Fowler’s comments, saying, "She was not speaking for our campaign, just as John McCain has said state parties don’t speak for him. But, obviously, this does not reflect our view."
Shapiro’s comment was a reference to McCain saying earlier this year that he could not stop the North Carolina Republican Party from airing an ad against Democratic gubernatorial candidates, which featured the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s controversial former pastor.
A McCain spokesman distinguished the Arizona senator’s posture toward the North Carolina GOP by noting that McCain — rather than one of his aides — personally spoke out against the state party’s ad, even while acknowledging that he was powerless to stop it.
"What she said was beyond the pale," said McCain spokesman Brian Rogers. "I think Barack Obama needs to step up and speak to this. This kind of stuff has no place in this campaign."

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
it was the south carolina delegate that laughed at the Hurricane hitting Lousiana also. What kind of constituents , what kind of people do they represent. I alway thought of south carolina as a decent state to vacation and travel , apparently not. They laugh at other peoples destruction and belittle women.
Posted by: notouristtosc | September 10, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
dems have sunk to a new low palin is a sitting governor
Posted by: david serra sr | September 10, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
She is wrong and she should not have said it.
Having said that, I still can’t find ONE qualification for Palin to be VP.
Posted by: ron | September 10, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
McCain refused to apologize for Westmorland calling Obama “uppity.” No need for Obama to “speak to this” then.
Posted by: Paleo | September 10, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Someone needs to keep the dems away from all microphones, particularly Obama. When not on a teleprompter, he sounds like a bombing comedian about to get booed off stage. Not very presidential.
Posted by: Becky | September 10, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
No longer a democrat.
Posted by: justme | September 10, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
No longer a democrat.
Posted by: justme | September 10, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Moslems and Democrats are just alike.
They both kill babies.
Moslems blow their up.
Democrats abort theirs.
Posted by: W Reeves | September 10, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Moslems and Democrats are just alike.
They both kill babies.
Moslems blow their up.
Democrats abort theirs.
Posted by: W Reeves | September 10, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
Why in the world would anyone apologize for something as plain as this? The fact is that this Palin woman uses her kids as props. Her kid is pregant, she has a whole bunch of her own, and she has placed her career above her family.. what is so hard to figure out? In the meantime anyone regardless of political party, race… Hey, I don’t care if you’re from the moon. anyone with a brain realizes that this woman is a career hound and could care less about her own kids. Especially the one with the Downs syndrome. She like to yap liekshe’s in one of her silly church services about what everyone else oughta be doing. Who cares if she had a kid or didn’t have one.
Posted by: pekopper | September 10, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Why is ABC reporting on what this guy says? Makes no sense to what his opinion is more than anybody else’s. BTW: When are we going to hear how that fraud case is going against Biden’s son???
Posted by: Bill | September 10, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
ron – what qualification might Palin? Look at John Edwards when he was considered. He had served some time in the Senate, but prior to that, he was a personal injury lawyer collecting fees. What qualified him to be VP? I didn’t like Carter and Clinton, but you can’t argue against their experience since both were sitting governors of this country? How come nobody questioned the qualifications of Al Gore whose only claim was a senator. Yes, only a senator – he didn’t have any executive experience.
Posted by: Gina | September 10, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
No longer a Republican.
Posted by: ItsObama | September 10, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
No Longer a Republican.
Posted by: ItsObama | September 10, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Classy. Not really. That was as low class a comment as could be uttered by a public servant.
I hope that the citizens of SC take note.
Posted by: DenverDem | September 10, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Governor Palin at least has had the opportunity and risk from making decisions that impact the lives of many people. Yes, people in Alaska are also members of this country. What about Obama? What’s he done that he would take the risks on decisions he’s made? None? Yes, you’re right, none. His so-called claim to work across the isle was debunked by Senator Luger, with whom he claimed to work. Obama is a joke. He has no experience, he’s immature politically, and personally. He cannot and will not respond to these criticisms without making it personal. His elitism is the turnoff to people in flyover country.
Posted by: Gina | September 10, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
It was a very ill-concieved choice of wording.
The fact is that Palin’s only qualification (by the standards of experience set by McCain up until a few weeks ago) is that she is palatable to the religious right.
I’ve become disenchanted by this election cycle.
It’s all about diversions.
There Will Be Backlash.
First the Hail Mary” – “Trust us – you’ll like her.”
Too much deceit, and now attacks about an unfortunate (but true) choice of words, and the mindless spinning about “lipstick on a pig,” and hourly Rove style childishness.
Posted by: Republican VN Era Veteran | September 10, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
ron…I can’t find one good reason to vote for Obama either.
http://ruckmaker.blogspot.com/2008/03/ncobra-typical-whites-candidate.html
Posted by: carolyn | September 10, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Wow, call me crazy here, but I think it’s kinda foolish for people to bring up the experience issue and equate it with Gov. Palin. Let’s face it folks, she’s the only one of the four Pres\VP candidates that has ANY executive experience whatsoever. Taking that and equating it to both parties recent candidates over the past 10-15 years, I’d say she was more than qualified to lead.
Posted by: Lovesthiscountry | September 10, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
So I keep hearing the angry left scream that Palin used her kids as props. So, did Barry? Or Biden? I seem to recall a little ploy at the DNC where Barry, on video had a quaint discussion with his girls. Reality, the angry left have lost it. As for how you keep screaming about her qualifications, what is Barry’s again? Keep it up, Obama is sinking fast.
Posted by: jwbe | September 10, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
ron;
You sir, are ‘Uppity’.
The last time I checked Webster’s Dictionary, it is a standard word within the English vernacular.
While you are at it, look up the word ‘vernacular’. I spelled it out for you.
So much for the Democratic ‘Great Society’ education policies that have so failed the American Public at the taxpayer’s expense.
Your ‘Ebonics’ be damned…
Posted by: richasis | September 10, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
When you can’t beat them with ideas, try sleaze and personal attacks. ZeroBama is getting a little desperate.
Posted by: Joaquin B. | September 10, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
We have lost all dignity here. First of all, this democractic official should have known better. This was totally a low blow.
Second, to the democratic women who feel Sarah Palin is putting her career over her famly, you are the party that says there are no limitations, remember?
Second, why do you seem to feel that Sarah’s youngest wouldn’t receive better medical care as a VP’s child than he would in the far north of Alaska? really, come on now.
Posted by: TT | September 10, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
That’s a pretty low blow. I cant help but to laugh at the Dem meltdown going on. Nancy Pelosi pushed Prince Barak down the dems throats at the expense of Hillary….who BTW would be faring better right now than Obama if she were the nominee. I was going to vote for HRC…I might vote McCain…I sure as hell will not vote for Obama.
Posted by: Maximeliano | September 10, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Don’t minimize Palin by demeaning her because she is pro-life. These new polls have me (a life time democrat) completely thrilled. Cheaters never prosper, Barack. Don’t be expecting Hillary to do your misogynistic dirty work against Palin for you either.
To think,Barack, you could have had the most experienced, gracious, intelligent, tough female running mate by your side; but, alas, your big fat arrogant ego just couldn’t take it.
I’m really gonna dig it when that younger, more attractive hocky mom sends you and your pompous DNC (which, by the way, stands for Does Not Connect) to political H-E-double hocky sticks!!!!
Barack Obama, you’re one arrogant piece of work.
Posted by: ShouldaCouldaWoulda | September 10, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
The dems are desperate and sinking below bottom line!
This is even more outrageous and blunt than Obama’s “lipstick on pig” subtle attack.
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
The evidence is mounting and the impact is clear. Obama is using carefully crafted tactics aimed at influencing the misogynistic wing of the Democratic Party in hopes of corralling all their votes. I predict he will be highly successful. Way to go Obama!
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 10, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
“We have lost all dignity here. First of all, this democractic official should have known better. This was totally a low blow.
Second, to the democratic women who feel Sarah Palin is putting her career over her famly, you are the party that says there are no limitations, remember?
Second, why do you seem to feel that Sarah’s youngest wouldn’t receive better medical care as a VP’s child than he would in the far north of Alaska? really, come on now.” <Posted by: TT | Sep 10, 2008 9:38:21 PM
Well put, TT!
Posted by: Lovesthiscountry | September 10, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
I,m calling for Ms. Fowler to reasign as chair of the DNC for S.C.effective immeadiatly. This woman has no place in the national debate. Period.
Posted by: JB | September 10, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Matt Damon or whatever from the Bourn Extreme just showed himself to be the same kind of moron as a butt load of other actors are in an interview today. He’s just one more pretty boy actor that actually takes himself seriously that I will never spend money to watch again.
Posted by: beowulf1 | September 10, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
The lacking of character among the democratic politicians are forcing democrats to vote for republicans.
McCain has the gut to take on his own party when they are wrong! Palin did the same thing. That shows their character!
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
But isn’t that her only qualification or did I miss something?
Posted by: Suze1 | September 10, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
The McCain Campaign uses these hate lobbyist against Obama. These shameful people haveworked with the following companies. Lets stop supporting them ASAP until they denounce McCain. Let’s stick together and ban these businesses: Google, Verizon, US Airways, Dell, Fannie Mae, General Motors,United Technologies, Hewlett Packard, Exxon and Land of Lakes. And If McCain wins lets still boycott these companies for four years and FOX news.
Posted by: kim | September 10, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
The McCain Campaign uses these hate lobbyist against Obama. These shameful people haveworked with the following companies. Lets stop supporting them ASAP until they denounce McCain. Let’s stick together and ban these businesses: Google, Verizon, US Airways, Dell, Fannie Mae, General Motors, United Technologies, Hewlett Packard, Exxon and Land of Lakes. And If McCain wins lets boycott these companies and FOX news.
Posted by: kim | September 10, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
i can’t find one achievement of the great black dope’s, one personal tie, one family story that would make me vote for him.
further, he releases the usual attack maggots, then claims no ties to them.
this manchild is too much of a personally flawed immature candidate to be potus
Posted by: theSwimmah | September 10, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Obama’s mother should also be qualified then. She did not have an abortion either.
Posted by: jon | September 10, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
dear kim,
don’t forget your lunch when you get on the short yellow bus tomorrow.
Posted by: akdafool | September 10, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Getting back to the issues for a minute, John McCain has an unmitigated anti-women voting record.
Take for example, his support for the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Here we have the case of a woman who proved in a court of law that her employer, Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company intentionally discriminated against her because she is a woman.
Remarkably, the Republican court told her that she was barred from suing due to the fact that she hadn’t filed within 180 days of being hired! How was she supposed to sue when the salaries were secret?
What did the Democrats do? They wrote a law to reverse the Republican court and return the law to its previous interpretation.
What did the Republican’s do? They FILIBUSTERED the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, showing once and for all that they don’t have one ounce of decency.
What did John McCain do? He supported the filibuster and said that women like Lilly Ledbetter ‘should work harder’.
Put lipstick on that pig!
http://www.slate.com/id/2167286/
Posted by: John's conscience | September 10, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Amending my last post:
‘Take for example John McCain’s opposition to the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.
http://www.slate.com/id/2189983/
Posted by: John's conscience | September 10, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Fowler joins the list of other democratic women who are stuck in this whole abortion focus. Women care about how other women are treated. It’s fine to disagree, but you don’t have to demean people especially other women. When will Obama give a speech on sexism?
Posted by: rafraf | September 10, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
let’s just be real here, Obama has a serious “lack of judgement” with his personal associations and his poor choice of words. He has a pen full pigs with lipstick on.
Posted by: akdafool | September 10, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
I’m a big fan of Obama and will vote for him again in November , but whoever slammmed Sarah Palin for having Trig is way wrong.
I can’t put myself in her place but that is a highly personal choice she made and although I might not have made it myself I respect her right to make that choice and respect her for making it.
That said as attractive as she is she’s just a cover for the same old Bush McCain screw the Middle Class policies.
Posted by: Bill in NC | September 10, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
McCain said the same lipstick on the pig comment about Clinton’s healthcare plan in 1993, it’s been said before. It’s a saying that has been used for years. Also, Obama has already said it a few years ago about the Iraq War. That’s why that fake outrage McCain tried to use isn’t sticking. Try something else. Obama/Biden 2008!
Posted by: Marcus | September 10, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Look for Joe Biden to drop out, he is looking bad, I wonder about his health. I Like Joe but I don’t think his heart is in this race… He said today Hillary is a better pick than he is. he was kind of depressed. even though i am voting McCain/Palin, i won’t say anything bad about Joe Biden, I think he is a good man
Posted by: Country First | September 10, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
So she should have just aborted that retard??? Right, nice one from a democrat… Great way to lose an election.
Posted by: manomano | September 10, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
Having said that, I still can’t find ONE qualification for Palin to be VP. ~ Ron
That’s funny. Governor Sarah Palin’s political career started in 1992. That’s a lot of time to have done “nothing” as you claim. Meanwhile, Sen. Barack Obama has two speaches he gave.
Hmmm…
Posted by: WxDaddy | September 10, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Why are there still people comparing McCain’s lipstick comment with Obama’s?
There’s no comparison!
Gov. Palin just said the lipstick phrase in her great speech several days ago. Obama is either extremely ignorant or arrogant to give such comment. In context, he was clearly attacking Gov. Palin. The pause, the audience laughing… Obama even admitted to Letterman he had Palin in mind while saying that comment! But this clever boy now is saying he was refering her to the lipstick.
Obama is desperate and way too low!
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Bill in NC, can you tell us just how Bush screwed the middle class? Take your time.
I am middle class and I paid less taxes last April than I ever did. My medical care is the best I have ever had, and the cheapest. Thank YOU George Bush.
Now back to the topic – democrats have one finger up their butt and one in their mouth and then switch.
At the rate this is going, both Obammy AND Hairplug will have to drop out by November. Oprah will step in to take Obammy’s place. Babbs will run for VP.
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 10, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
By the way Carol Fowler is the wife of Former DNC Chairman Don Fowler who also cough on video tape saying to while talking to Congressman John Spratt of SC, and you could of hear that Spratt “chuckles” along with: “The hurricane?s going to hit New Orleans about the time they start?. The timing is, at least it appears now, that it?ll be there Monday. That just demonstrates God?s on our side.” And again the same lame apology “If I offended anybody…. I am sorry” Always look for “IF”.
Posted by: Phillip | September 10, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Most Democrats seem to be obsessed with abortion, a procedure that ends with the termination of a human life. While abortion is legal in the USA, there are many people who believe that this practice is barbaric, and choose instead to give their babies life. Why then is death glorified, and life not celebrated?
Posted by: Phil | September 10, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Matt Damon or whatever from the Bourn Extreme just showed himself to be the same kind of moron …….He’s a moron?????? Please tell me ONE example of what he said not being true???? He was RIGHT! Spot on accurate assessment. It is an absolute disgrace that a hollywood writer/actor is better able to assess a critical situation than our republican candidate for president, yes, I agree. But Matt Damon’s two minute assessment and concerns are SPOT on accurate. President Palin is a SCARY thought. Republicans are acting horrendously irresponsible going along with this ridiculous possibility.
Posted by: Jess N Boston | September 10, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
Bravo for SOMEONE finally saying what needed to be said. She is exactly right. Supposedly, Sarah Palin is qualified to be VP because she’s a mom and made the allegedly heroic “choice” to carry a down syndrome baby to term. If those are her qualifications, I think it is totally fair to raise the question of how good she was at being a mom (not very, as far as I can tell) and whether she is looking to deny other women the right to having any choice about their own pregnancies.
Posted by: Elizabeth | September 10, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
By the way Carol Fowler is the wife of Former DNC Chairman Don Fowler who also cough on video tape saying to while talking to Congressman John Spratt of SC, and you could of hear that Spratt “chuckles” along with: “The hurricane?s going to hit New Orleans about the time they start?. The timing is, at least it appears now, that it?ll be there Monday. That just demonstrates God?s on our side.” And again the same lame apology “If I offended anybody…. I am sorry” Always look for “IF”.
Posted by: Phillip | September 10, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Country first, I agree with you and feel bad for Joe Biden, too. Even if he’s not considering drop out, Obama might dump him. Remember Rudy’s suggestion of “have the VP thing in writing?” It’s not a joke, it’s Obama’s flip flop nature. And Obama is desperate now!
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
This is clearly 1) sexism, 2) callous, total disregard to value of life, 3) remark that unfitting of a leader. Unfortunately, this election season these kind of people are running amok.
Posted by: indepdent heart | September 10, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
God help me, but I find that i am just totally enjoying the anger of the left. It is exhilarating; I can’t wait for the next lefty to go off!!! as if they really understood the middle class. I find this amazing and funny and so so interesting. Loving it! There really is a BDS, and now we get to see PDS.. LOVE IT!!!!!
Posted by: mignon | September 10, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Most Democrats seem to be obsessed with abortion….excuse me????? WHO just put an uneducated person on their because of her anti abortion stance. There is not ONE logical reason why she would be chosen over far more experienced more respected republicans other than that they were possibly not anti abortion enough. Democrats have a graduate from Columbia University, Harvard and president of the Harvard law Review, state senator for 7 years and US senator for 2 years on the ticket who has absolutely fabulous ideas onthe economy, creating a renewable energy industry and education among a few on our ticket. We pick candidate who show enormous promise and have fabulous ideas that will fix problems. You people chose someone based on abortion and only abortion and because of it you are going to drive this country into the fastest downward spiral we have ever seen since the great Depression.
Posted by: matt | September 10, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
======================================
Jess in Boston, Damon is a fruitcake and has no business telling anyone how to vote. Anyone who listens to him, is an idiot. All he does is read some lines.
Palin is a Governor of a State. She has more intelligence than a Hollyweird pr*ck.
Want to know what is ridiculous? Having a “community organ grinder” running for president.
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 10, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
========================================
Matt has taken the Obamma Kool Aid. Just how is someone who can’t decide how to vote 140 times, who votes “PRESENT”, going to know enough to get us some lower priced gas?
He is a moron leading morons.
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 10, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
why do republicans have such horrible cognition? It means that republicans do not have any concerns for their public leaders except being anti abortion. And it’s true, isn’t it? President Palin will know NOTHING about wall street, or the banks she is supposed to decide on regulating, or write tax codes for, or manage fanny mae and deal with absorbing the losses of defunct mortgages and deal with the liquidity events and how they effect shareholders and how that will effect teh economy. president Palin has NO education on world history, or historic conflicts in the middleeast, the eastern block or eurasia, but will have to make snap decisions on russian aggression and responses to Vladimire Putin. President Palin will be even LESS educated on EVERY BLESSED THING than Bush was. Yet you want her. Why???? because she is anti abortion. YOu all are THAT shallow and niave and irresponsible.
Posted by: Jess | September 10, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Let me borrow Fowler’s line and use it on Obama:
Obama’s “primary qualification” for the presidency is that he is black.
How does that sound? I am sure nobody should feel offended.
And I am an independent.
Posted by: Lori | September 10, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Palin…Bush in a bra and panties..
Posted by: P-51 jock | September 10, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Excellent arguments on this blog. I’m going to vote for Obama but it will not bother me if McCain wins. I’m voting for Obama for Supreme Court appointees. If McCain wins lets hope that any of the Supremes wait four years for Hillary’s run, before they retire.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 10, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Obama has a stellar education that prepares him for financial, world politics and history of wars. Had bush actually attended his classes he may have been a good president, but the only reason he got in his school was daddy and no matter how much he flunked, he’s never get an F. Obama, however, got in on merit nad had he not hit his grades he would have lost his scholarships. Obama was president of the harvard Law Review – the MOSt wanted positin for every student at Harvard, Obama got it. Obama isVERY smart, his ideas are GREAT. He not only has a stellar amount of knowledge to fall back on, he took time out to volunteer in t he city to understand issues of poor people, of urban problems, and he has 7years of state senator experience and 2 years of US senatorial experience. HOw will Obama know what to do??? with the wealth of knowledge in his head, you can already tell from his ideas. TRy LISTENING To them. They are exactly what we need. And if there is trouble in the world, he has the depth of education and history to dip into to respond a nd certianly Biden has the practical experience in that area. Obama/Biden is a VERY competent well rounded Team and a EXCELLENT Choice. We will be safe and have a strong economy under Obama/Biden.
Posted by: mark M. | September 10, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
McCAIN IS REALLY COUNTING ON WOMEN TO BE IDIOTS … WHY ELSE WOULD HE WAIT SO LONG TO PICK SARAH PALIN? …”Duh”…NO ONE KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT HER OR ALASKA … ANY REAL WOMAN WOULD TELL McCAIN TO SHOVE HIS VP PICK UP HIS A$$ … ONLY A REAL IDIOT WOULD BELEAVE THAT SHE CAN GO TO WASHINGTON D.C. AND SHAKE THINGS UP … CERTAINLY A “HOCKEY MOM” CAN RIGHT? … IF YOU BELEAVE THAT, COME AND BUY THIS BRIDGE IN NEW YORK THAT I HAVE FOR SELL …
Posted by: jamesearlc | September 10, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Philip, thanks for reminding us who is Carol Fowler’s husband. If he’s one of those in the dialogue “the hurricane is God-sent to help the Democrats”, then no wonder Carol will say those shameless words.
Little Trig was born before Palin knowing her VP selection, after her winning governor election, and after the couple knowing baby’s Down syndrom. Those who attack Gov. Palin of using child for personal gain are shameless!
Mr. and Mrs. Palin deserve a lot of respect for their honoring and protecting human life! Little Trig is indeed pretty and adorable.
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Palin…Bush in a bra and panties….ok, that’s a bit rude. YOu dont know that bush never wore a bra and panties. AND while bush hardly went to class, Palin has essentially NO education. She is WORSEthan Bush. so you get all the bad stuff, the arrogance of thinking you ahve all the answers when you are well of ingornance, the wacko ideas that the earth is 4000 years old and the end of the world is a good thing, BUT you have NO CHANCE that she owuld have EVER heard the slightest converation on economics, finance, banking, trade laws, world history……
Posted by: Jess | September 10, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
McCAIN IS AN OLD MAVERICK … IT’S GLUE FACTORY TIME FOR HIM …
Posted by: jamesearlc | September 10, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Obama’s “primary qualification” for the presidency is that he is black…..if someone votes for him only because he’s black then that is true, and if he won, that would be true. However, if he won we luckily would have the president of the Harvard law Review as our presidetn. A graduate of Columbia University and Harvard. A sate senator for 7 years and US senator for 2. WE would have a person who has FANTASTIC ideas about growing a renewable engery economy and cutting our deficit very sharply and funding more college grads so we can compete with India, Russia and china in this global economy. We would not only have a VERY level headed intelligent person to deal with wacko world leaders, we would also have Joe Biden who served on the foreign relations committe and has a thorough knowledge of world politics, histories and cultures. So though you voted f or him ‘because he’s black’ you get a stellar leader for the country. If you vote for Palin because she’s anti abortin, what you get an uneducated president Palin who has nothing, nothing, nothing and wil not know how to deal with onesingle issue and the damage she could do is absolutely frightening. Can you imagine president Palin trying to figure out what to do with the fannie mae crises and how to ru n them or whther or not to acquire more large financial institutions that are failing and threaten plunging the economy into depression??? how irresponsible cna you possibly be????
Posted by: Matt M | September 10, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I don’t agree with every decision Bush made. But don’t forget Bush administration has been keeping this country safe and enemies on the run for these years!
Hilary’s “3 o’clock phone call at White House” Ad was so true! My order of choices of person answering that call is: Bush — 1st, McCain — 2nd, Clinton — 3rd, Obama — NO WAY!!!
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Republicans need to buck up, get past their inferiority complexes and their pettiness and see the absolute danger in a president Palin. They need to stop the games and think of what is best for this nation. A president Palin in charge of regulatin banking, relations with Putin is purely frightning.
Posted by: Brian O. | September 10, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Let me make my list complete:
My order of choices of person answering that call is:
Bush — 1st, McCain — 2nd, Clinton — 3rd, Palin — 4th (tough governor with real crisis handling experiences), Biden — 5th (soft on enemies); Obama –NO WAY and Never!!!
—————
I don’t agree with every decision Bush made. But don’t forget Bush administration has been keeping this country safe and enemies on the run for these years!
Hilary’s “3 o’clock phone call at White House” Ad was so true! My order of choices of person answering that call is: Bush — 1st, McCain — 2nd, Clinton — 3rd, Obama — NO WAY!!!
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Ironically, not having an abortion is probably Obama’s only qualification.
Posted by: o mueller | September 10, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
McCAIN STATED THE EXACT SAME THING ABOUT PUTTING LIPSTICK ON A PIG ONLY 1 MONTH AGO … NO ONE WAS CRYING THEN … THE ONLY REASON THE REPUBLICANS ARE CRYING ABOUT THIS STATEMENT IS TO DISTRACT FROM THE REAL ISSUES …
Posted by: jamesearlc | September 10, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Palin is a Governor of a State….She has no education. She knows nothing about finance, or world politics or world history or tax codes or finance. How will she know how to decide on regulating the large financial industries that keep collapsing requiring taxpayers to bai l them out? how will she decide on what to do about the liquidity of the millions of shareholders and how the ripple effects wil also effect the economy? Her state is easier run than most large cities and when she ran it she went horrifically over budget and needed a lobbyist to get her moneyto pay for her overspending. She knoew nothign and did nothingabout healthcare. How is she supposed to run medicaid, medicare and the manage the portfolios of a system that will soon run out of money yet need to payout to the millions of babyboomers who will soon be eligible. She is HORRENDOUSLY unqualified in experience AND she has NO education to fall back on either. Between Biden and Obama they have both Stellar educational backrounds in all these areas as well as experience. Obama was state senator for 7 years, he was president of the harvard law review and has a very well rounded education at harvard adn columbia university in all these areas. the Obama Biden pair is HIGHLY skilled and ready for those challeges. President Palin IS irresponsible to dangerous. absolutely absurd. I notice you spent alot of time insulting Damon yet you didn’t have ONE exampe of how he was wrong. He wasn’t. He was spot on accurate nad you know it. You are an irresponsible AMericna if you every made a President Palin possible.
Posted by: Matt M | September 10, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
Why are there still people comparing McCain’s lipstick comment with Obama’s?
There’s no comparison!
Gov. Palin just said the lipstick phrase in her great speech several days ago. Obama is either extremely ignorant or arrogant to give such comment. In context, he was clearly attacking Gov. Palin. The pause, the audience laughing… Obama even admitted to Letterman he had Palin in mind while saying that comment! But this clever boy now is saying he was refering her to the lipstick.
Obama is desperate and way too low!
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
I laughed at the Damon commentary for about a nanosecond, and then realized, Oh My God! this is true! not funny. not funny at all. ANyone who votes for a possible President Palin is antiamerican. Surely, no matter how m uch you want a ‘folksy’ president, surely even republicans must have the common sense to see how dangerous this is. For all the jokes about republicans being stupid, I do not believe in my heart of hearts they are really THAT stupid. Maybe they’ll defend her for now, but when the time comes, when they are in the ballot box, I think they’ll curse a nd be angry but I don’t think they will actually make a President Palin possible. I dont think they are THAT bad.
Posted by: John in the heartland | September 10, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Seems like the McSame apologists above won’t clever up until it’s them who lose their job and house, can’t gas up the car for a vacation they can’t afford … then get rendered to an undisclosed location for waterboarding.
Yep, keep supporting Bush and his drive towards a military dictatorship. McLame can help by showing how he starts – and “wins” – wars. And keep SP out front to distract the marks. It’s easier if no one is paying attention.
Posted by: Arturo Sclerosis | September 10, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Gov. Palin has more executive experience than the dem ticket combined. She took on her own party when they are wrong. She had real responsibility and got real things done under her administration. She is the most popular governor in America! Matt Damon is ignorant. Gov. Palin is much more qualified than those who attacked her so shamelessly.
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
I’m a midwestern republican, a little moderate, not much. I have all sorts of resevations about Obama but I can’t do the Palin thing. I can’t. I’m pretty ticked this is where we are, but come the day, I think I’m gonna have to vote for Obama, go home and pick up some beer and puke. I can’t do a possible President Palin. I can’t. It does scare me enough that i cant even stay home and drink. It’s something that can’t happen.
Posted by: Rocky mountainguy | September 10, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Arturo Sclerosis,
“military dictatorship”? Are you an American? You have this kind of freedom of speech because the men and women on the front are fighting for it! Because the Bush Administration is keeping this country safe and protecting it! You have all the right to dislike your government because this is a FREE country, for which the enemies hate us!!!
Posted by: victory | September 10, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
It’s a fact – all women MUST HAVE AN ABORTION in order to be a member of the Democrat party!
Having an abortion is the only way to prove your loyalty to the party! No abortion – don’t even think about being a democrat!
Posted by: Adelyn | September 10, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
i am ashamed to be a democrat.that is way over the line.these “just words” are really demeaning.
Posted by: ray | September 10, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Bush administration has been keeping this country safe and enemies on the run…no actually. bush has blown the war in afghanistan, the only war that mattered. It is all over the news. The Taliban are back. Teh poppy fields are back. The Taliban are back to pre9/11 strenght per a memo released by our own state department. We have known t his for over 6 months now. Why don’t you? Osama Bin Laden has never been caught. Iraq was a distraction. Iraq was not our enemy and even now they want nothing more than for us to just leave them alone. Al Q, however, have been abandoned by bush a nd have grown in strenght and numbers. It is as though we never went into Afghanistan. Kabul is a very very small island. Bush blew it. And Bush has only done what a president SHOULD do. Why does he get special credit for it??? Obama will do it, any president cna do it. Bush had every bit of information to prevent 9/11, he just didn’t listen to it or use it. 9/11 happened because of neglect. So then after 3000 citizens died on his watch he stopped neglecting that part of his job. Whoodie doo. I’m not that impressed. I’m sure whomever comes after will not forget to read their freakn intelligence memos!
Posted by: Matt M | September 10, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
Where is Liberal House speaker Pelosi Obama’s friend screaming resign when their
own DNC(Do Nothing Congress) makes a despicable comment. This Democratic Party doesn’t value life
they call the unborn child a mistake and just a tissue to toss in the waste bin.
Posted by: 2nfer | September 10, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
May the Good Lord damn this man for saying such a sinful thing about Palin. He should be wiped with a chain.
Posted by: loyalamerican | September 10, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
Where is Liberal House speaker Pelosi Obama’s friend screaming resign when their
own DNC(Do Nothing Congress) makes a despicable comment. This Democrat Party doesn’t value life
they call the unborn child a mistake and just a tissue to toss in the waste bin.
Posted by: 2nfer | September 10, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
I think McCain/Palin just won!
Posted by: Christie | September 11, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
How sad the media stoops so low about Palin and her family…not only do they and dems have no class, they are just idiots…if all of you liberals hate America so bad…then get the heck out of our country and live in a third world country where you belong.
Posted by: kathymc | September 11, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
I think McCain/Palin just won….huh? what part of the statement is inaccurate? was she put on the ticket primarily because she is anti aboriton? yes or no? What qualifications does she have? no education. completely unqualified to handle the Fannie Mae crises or Bearn STerns or any other financial institution in trouble. completely unqualified to handle Vladimir PUtin. She ran overbudget in his term as mayor in a tiny town, smaller than an inner city high school. She has lied about not accepting pork and lobbying for it. What are her qualification besides being anti abortion? She has none. She was chosen primarily for that. So the statement, however disturbing to hear so bluntly put, is actually true.
Posted by: Jess in Boston | September 11, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
” palin is a sitting governor” Mostly of moose
Posted by: Unidentified Flying Officer | September 11, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
…if all of you liberals hate America so bad….The republicans value America so little they put a horrifically and scarily unqualified uneducated person asa possible presidential candiate because they have this need to force girls to developoe babies against their will. Republicans are acting childishly irresponsible with this fiasco supporting the CEO of this nation based on her reproductive opinions. It would be funny if it weren’t so scarily damaging to the future of this country.
Posted by: Eric B | September 11, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
God forbid president Putin says she reminds him of lipstick on a pig. She’ll be in the little girls’ room crying.
Posted by: Unidentified Flying Officer | September 11, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
“I think McCain/Palin just won!” You’d like to think so. But no, they’ll lose because in the end the American people will start asking about issues, and the Republicans have no response on that.
Posted by: Unidentified Flying Officer | September 11, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
think McCain/Palin just won….huh? what part of the statement is inaccurate? was she put on the ticket primarily because she is anti aboriton? yes or no? …..good point.
Posted by: mike M | September 11, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
“Because the Bush Administration is keeping this country safe and protecting it! ” When the Republicans are protecting the “right” of women to be FORCED to carry a rapist’s child and present him with an heir, when they have already rolled back civil rights and instituted torture in the last eight years, I wonder why they are fighting.
Posted by: Unidentified Flying Officer | September 11, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
God forbid president Putin says she reminds him of lipstick on a pig. She’ll be in the little girls’ room crying……………Even worse..she’ll be in the little girls room crying saying “That big mean man, what is his name? He just said…”…..She’ll hear that he invaded Georgia again and she’ll say “why would he invade the peach state?” …and someone will mention that it’s a disputed province and she’ll say “a disreputed what??? Does this have anything to do with bootlegging? because in Alaska one of our big problems was bootlegging and illegally hunting moose.”
Posted by: Mike M | September 11, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
Has ANY major party candidate for President or Vice President EVER been accused of having their major qualification to be no prior abortions? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! This is a SEXIST comment and COMPLETELY out of line! Fowler has just convinced me to go to the local McCain/Palin campaign office and volunteer 40 hours per week. I have the time and now I have the motivation!
Posted by: Michelle | September 11, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Because the Bush Administration is keeping this country safe and protecting it… you know what, ANY president will do that. Bush had a memo that told him he should have had no fly lists and luggage being scanned a month before the attacks. I agree, the only reason 9/11 happened is because bush was NOT doing his job. So now, he is doing that part of his job. Why does he deserve anything special for this? I don’t get rewarded for not screwing up on my job, it’s EXPECTED That i don’t fail collosally on my job. Why do republicans have such LOW expectations??? I’m s ure whoever takes the next presidency will read their messages.
Posted by: Eric | September 11, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
PALIN IS NOT QUALIFIED TO BE VP, MUCH LESS ONE STEP AWAY FROM THE PRESIDENCY!! YOU GUYS HAVE GOT TO WAKE UP – SHE IS NOT QUALIFIED BY ANY MEANS !!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: EHA | September 11, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
I have never been as disgusted as I am with Carol Fowler . Talk about a pig in lipstick. And as for Nobama, he is fortunately sinking faster than the titanic. I guess with all of the idiocy being spewed forth we can count on hearing from Reverand Wright soon. Oh, and let’s not forget about Tony Rezko. That could be an interesting October Surprise. Like a slimeball such as that will sit in prison to protect Nobama. Good grief the dems are dumber than a box of rocks for picking that as their candidate. No wonder congress has such a low performance rating.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
I agree – Palin has no qualifications to be VP of the country. This is a matter of the GOP getting swept up in a bunch of hype that is self created. Be aware, Palin is not qualified to be Mayor, much less VP or President.
Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
EVER been accused of having their major qualification to be no prior abortions?….Dear Lord you people are stupid. The primary qualification that she is anti abortion!!!! Get it????? She is saying that republicans picked her because her primary qualification is that she is anti abortion!! republicans just LOVE that she didn’t abort the baby. Ya know what, I think it’s great she didn’teither but that does NOT qualify her to be a possible president!!! But, well, i’m a republican. If I was, that alone would be good enough for me to vote for her.Get it?
Posted by: Jess N boston | September 11, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
I agree – Palin has no qualifications to be VP of the country. This is a matter of the GOP getting swept up in a bunch of hype that is self created. Be aware, Palin is not qualified to be Mayor, much less VP or President.
Posted by: Thomas | September 11, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
This is a matter of the GOP getting swept up in a bunch of hype that is self created…..No. This is a matter of the GOP putting their grab on power before what is good for the country. Do you honestly believe that McCain thinks this uneducated person is the best person to succeed him if he dies???? Of ALL the republicans??? Clearly not. But he DID NOT put country first, he put his ability to grab power. He KNOWS wingnuts will come out in droves for one issue and one issue only – abortion. Pick ANYONE who is rabidly anitabortion and they will come no matter how unqualified or uneducated. and how true did that prediction pan out to be?
Posted by: Matt M | September 11, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am
Recall the lipstick on a pitbull – well, that’s Sarah Palin’s version of lipstick on a pig – the same thing no matter how you describe it. She’s as much of a pig as she is a pitbull…..!!!!!!!! Don’t let her naughty librarian looks fool you!
Posted by: TCP | September 11, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
Ya know, if I’m in a fox hole, with some fancy weapon I am not familiar with andthere is enemy fire coming at me, I do NOT want a guy like me inthere. I want someone who knows more than me. I look at Palin and I have a business degree, now I do sales and forecasting and I think ,I could run Alaska. yup, I could. but when I see these banks failing and i listen to the wallstreet reports I know that i would have no idea what to do about that if I was dropped into that as my job. So I look at this women and I think, she is a journalism major, I actually know more about that stuff than her, do I feel comfortable with her taking control of things I would not be comfortable doing. F*ck no! This is f*cking insane. I can’t vote for McCain wiht this person as his second. what the hell was he thinking? Is it too late to lose this women?
Posted by: Nick | September 11, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
They (the GOP) chose Sarah Palin for a reason. Because she would ‘speak to’ those beneath McCain – those that thay would hope would connect with an uneducated woman with an unwed teenage pregnant child. If you side with her, then they have won.
Posted by: TLC | September 11, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am
If you look at McCains stand on the economy and Iraq, he is self defeating! He wants to grow the economy, but doesn’t know how to do so. That’s because he doesn’t care about the middle class. He and Palin are above the middle class and couldn’t care less if the middle class improved over the nest 4 to 8 years. He just does not CARE!!!!!
Posted by: RH | September 11, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
“EVER been accused of having their major qualification to be no prior abortions? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! This is a SEXIST comment and COMPLETELY out of line!” Rubbish. The Republicans put it out there. You can’t claim things as a credit for your candidate and then cry foul when people raise them.
Posted by: Unidentified Flying Officer | September 11, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
those that thay would hope would connect with an uneducated woman with an unwed teenage pregnant child. If you side with her, then they have won….you gotta ask, if their son had to have open heart surgery, would they look for someone who was ‘folksy’ and uneducated or would they looking for the Harvard Med school grad who was top if his class? Do you think ironing out this mess of yet another huge financial loaning institution is going to be easy??? These guys need to be regulated. It’s bad enough McCain probablywont know how to do it but this women would honestly be worse than me doing it. I CAN relate to her. and that’s what f*cking horrifies me.
Posted by: nick | September 11, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
W Reeves
You are an idiot..
Posted by: The Unshrub | September 11, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
you are 100% right and I don’t want to hear you apologizing to this stupid republicans.
Posted by: dennis | September 11, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am
I really don’t understand you Americans or your rather absurd political system.
Your economy is in ruins, education system seriously flawed, national debt at an all time high, jobs being outsourced by the thousands every month and all you want to talk about is which candidate or his/her minions is ( supposedly) trashing who ? Unbelievable.
I just saw a CNN report where a Rep strategist was asked why Palin has not been allowed to speak to reporters and her response was. ” we are gaining in the polls, no need to change our strategy “. Wow.
When will the American people look beneath the soundbites and actually research what the candidates believe in or what their platforms will mean for your people. If that were ever to happen, I would think Obama would win hands down.
Posted by: Ibeleaf | September 11, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
“I can’t vote for McCain wiht this person as his second. what the hell was he thinking? Is it too late to lose this women? ”
Barry has less experience than Palin, and he’s running for President, genius.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
“I just saw a CNN report where a Rep strategist was asked why Palin has not been allowed to speak to reporters and her response was. ” we are gaining in the polls, no need to change our strategy “. Wow.”
A rep strategist on CNN? That’s a joke right?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
“I really don’t understand you Americans or your rather absurd political system. ”
Then don’t comment on something that you don’t understand.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
ABC News blog post 09/10/2008
•••
The comments made by the “South Carolina Democratic Party chairwoman,” Carol Fowler, were not just in poor taste, tactically stupid, and sexist in the extreme, they were wildly inaccurate. Governor Palin has not only been a mayor and a governor, she has also been on a very important statewide committee, and began in politics way back in 1992. As such, she has more executive experience — as a matter of objective fact — than Senators Barack Obama and Joe Biden, combined. That’s important, because the four major candidates are all vying for positions at the very apex of our Executive Branch. If you needed brain surgery, wouldn’t you want someone who had done it before? Palin has. McCain has, too: he was a wing commander in the Navy, an executive position in which, by all accounts, he performed admirably, turning around a poorly-performing unit and handling a budget of many millions of dollars very effectively.
*
Let’s forget about all of that for just a bit, though. Let’s examine her record in Alaska. She took on the entrenched power structure of her own party and won. Sarah Palin ran against corruption, cronyism and the good old boy network and won. She took on the oil companies and won — twice. She made them give more money to Alaska, then sent that money back to the people. She made them come back to the table and worked a gas pipeline deal that was far better for Alaska and nowhere near as favorable for the big energy companies. All those things stand as genuine, significant and large-scale achievements to her credit, and illustrate that she will not be some conventional politician who will meekly kowtow to any powers-that-be.
*
By way of contrast, the most prestigious rating system in Washington, the National Journal, rated Senator Obama as having the most liberal voting record in the entire Senate. The meaning of that is that Senator Obama virtually never bucks his party, let alone on any issue of importance. He is nothing like John McCain, who has often bucked his president and his party establishment on a wide variety of issues, often by working across party lines. Just to mention two of the more famous, McCain was a part of the so-called “Gang of 14,” half Democrats and half Republicans, all of whom defied their party leaders to insist no deal would be made on judicial nominations that they did not approve, thereby insuring that the most partisan members of their respective parties were angered and disappointed. In the second example, Senator McCain collaborated with the very liberal Russ Feingold on legislation that drove the members of his own party nuts, because many of them perceived it as unconstitutional, at least in some of its parts. Also by way of contrast, Obama’s achievements are notable chiefly by their absence, in that he has done very little of note with his marvelous education, except winning office and running for the Presidency. It is terrible for the Democrats, but their nominee for President of the United States is truly less qualified for that job than is the Governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin.
*
When I first saw Senator McCain’s campaign ad, I thought it went too far: the phrase is certainly a common one and has been used by many people in many contexts, including, famously, by Senator McCain. When I repeatedly watched the comment by Senator Obama, however, I reached a different conclusion. A we all know, or should know by now, the junior Senator from Illinois is an extraordinarily intelligent, gifted and articulate person of high academic achievement. Are we supposed to believe somehow that when he paused for several seconds after saying the phrase in question, waiting for the amusement and applause from his partisan audience in appreciation for his sly jest — which came surely and loudly — that this great orator was doing so in innocence? That is an insult both to Senator Obama’s ability as a speaker and to the intelligence of America’s voters! As so many of our mothers and grandmothers taught us, it isn’t what you say, it is how you say it.
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 11, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
“Barry has less experience than Palin”…. ????? Palin is uneducated, first problem. BIG problem. She was a mayor of a really really small town, She is governor for less than two years of a state that has more moose than people and their biggest problem is bootlegging and illegal hunting. WTF makes you think this i s more experience to handle Lehman going belly up and the decisions about the economy than a guy who graduated from Columbia University and Harvard and was president o fthe Harvard Law Review, has 7 years of state senate experience and 2 as united states senator. Obama has MUCH more background in finance, law, and education in history, world politics, constitutional law, issuing of stock, diluting of stock and the ripple effects in the stock market, dividens, hostile takeovers..etc. She has none. None. No education. The idea of her being in charge of such complicated matter that she has NEVER been anywhere near is horrifying. absolutely horrifying. If McCain put counry first, he would have put someone behind him who could run it. Shame on McCain.
Posted by: Jess | September 11, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
“Barry has less experience than Palin”…. ????? ”
That’s what I said. Did I stutter?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am
If you needed brain surgery, wouldn’t you want someone who had done it before?….What ‘brain surgery’ has Palin done??? Has she EVER had any experience in foreign relations? Obama had 200,000 Germans chanting his name, he had the french president gushing over him and he just had a representative of TOny blair’s government practically endoring him to the point, per the BBC, where McCain called and complained yet Blaire did NOT retract the statement. What experience does she has in regulating financial markets, what educational background does she have in finance, economics, stocks, investments, bank regulation??? does she have any??? no. Barak has extensive educational background in all these areas and 7 years in the state senate and 2 as united states senator. IF you are looking for a brain surgeon, would you look for someone who went to medical school???? woudl you look for a folksy gal, or would you look for the guy who graduated from Harvard Medical school??? let’s get real. You can’t possibly have experience in all the areas that may come up while being president of the united states, but just as any doctor or engineer, what you fall back on then is your education, and palin has none. No safety net of knowledge and with her crashed the country.
Posted by: Matt M | September 11, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
“Has she EVER had any experience in foreign relations? Obama had 200,000 Germans chanting his name, he had the french president gushing over him and he just had a representative of TOny blair’s government practically endoring’
Throwing a concert in Europe doesn’t equal foreign relations experience, otherwise David Hasselhoff would have been elected by now.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am
That’s what I said…and it is incredulous to me that someone could be that wrong and that obtuse to thier own ignornance. Palin has NO financial or economic experience in stocks, wallstreet, econmic incentives, healthcare, finance, foreign affairs, world history, world cultures and no educational background in any of those areas as well. she has no safety net of knowledge to fall back on. She overspent her budget and sheopned a pipeline, period. She did not do a single thing, besides hire a lobbiest to get money and then lie about it at the convention. If it’s not about bootlegging or pipelines she actually has ZERO experience AND is uneducated to boot. HOw is that even midly comparable to a columbia university and harvard graduate who waspresident ofthe harvard law review??? I’m SURE Obama could run alaska. Do you think for a moment she could be president of the Harvard Law REview???? She has no education in constitutional law. She could not even do the job he did in COLLEGE.
Posted by: Jess | September 11, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am
“Palin has NO financial or economic experience in stocks,”
She is currently running a state. She has executive experience. He has ZERO executive experience.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Throwing a concert ….every political event the past 50 years has a concert, but how many have had 200,000 foreigners chanting the politicians name. Obama filled a stadium for his convention. Like it or not, he LEADS people. while McCain has no support, and Palin is a curiosity and a polarizing figure, Obama LEADS people. I notice yo udidn’t mention how the leaders of england and france also are very highly favorable toward him. if you have a patriotic bone in your body you would understand how GOOD it would be to have a president with as much as good will as Obama gets from the world. Not only are your posts inaccurate, I find them completely disingenous. I think you know i am right, in your heart of hearts. If you vote for Mccain and possible president palin you are being horrendously irresponsible. I’m sure every person who supports her is well aware how dangerous a President Palin would be. You are putting party before country. shame on you. good night.
Posted by: Jess | September 11, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
“every political event the past 50 years has a concert, but how many have had 200,000 foreigners chanting the politicians name.”
We have enough celebrities. I’m sure Madonna could attract twice that number. We need a leader, and this time around, the only serious choice is McCain.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
“I’m SURE Obama could run alaska. Do you think for a moment she could be president of the Harvard Law REview???? She has no education in constitutional law. She could not even do the job he did in COLLEGE”. …holy crap! good point! I’m off to bed too. Interesting final thought, though.
Posted by: Matt M | September 11, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
“Obama LEADS people.”
You’re deluded. What people has he ever lead????
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
‘I’m SURE Obama could run alaska. ”
Maybe he can. If he did, then we would see if he could actually deliver and not just talk about delivering. Soaring rhetoric doesn’t make a leader. Just look at his speech buddy Deval.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
I care about the animals and the planet. Palin does not. I do not like her. She is a strange women getting stranger because she is not talking about herself. So now I have formed a bad opinion that will not change. They lose a vote. Oh well none of them are any good.
Posted by: Terri | September 11, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Shes the antichrist. Please people, dont vote for the beast!
Posted by: Jo | September 11, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
what I have seen happen in the Press
and what I know about his VP. and
the story behind her ..
I know why McBush Made her a VP.
TO bring talk on the economy – Heath care
the stupid war in Iraq – and the whole
List of 8 Years of the problems
Let go by Bush to a stand still
so the Nation can Talk about Lipstick
on Pigs .. and who is talking about who
Mcbush has no plans for the office of
the President he and is VP should never
have been have shown the American People
they can not do any thing but
PULL Stunts like 2 circus Clowns..
I am not amused……..
Posted by: Anita Yova | September 11, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am
Hate to break it to you, but when 80% of France says they’d vote for you it’s not a good thing. I’m quite certain that if given the opportunity, 100% of Al Qaeda would vote for him (that’s bad too).
At least France has is showing some signs of self defense. They’ve developed a new tank with 5 gears. Four reverse and one forward (in case they come from behind).
Posted by: Dave B | September 11, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am
To Anita Yova-
guess what, you are an IDIOT. hate to tell you, but the idiocy you are spewing ……….. you’re probably alive because the idiotic terrorists are so scared of Bush they haven’t attacked the US. Grow up and learn something. Find a cure for your case of cranio-rectal inversion.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am
OBAMA SUPPORTERS READ AND PASS ON. POST EVERYWHERE…
GREAT ARTICLE ABOUT THE NUMBERS:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/09/palin_doesnt_matter_numbers_do.html
Posted by: Chad | September 11, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
Please explain why no one in the mainstream media is willing to ask about Sarah Palin and her non-pregnancy? There are no pics of her pregnant in the past two years yet she claims that baby is hers and not her daughter’s. If she lied about this that means she has committed a felony by altering a birth certificate. Yet it seems non of the press is brave enough to investigate this. Bill Maher is the only one who has mentioned this on his show. Please bring this out. The public needs to know.
Posted by: aurora | September 11, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
Conversely, does that mean that only females who have had an abortion vote Democtrat?
WOW… so much for the party of choice. Unless you choose our way, you are not a real woman. Is that it?
Posted by: diamond lou | September 11, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
Dave B-
LOVE your comment. France couldn’t fight it’s way out of a paper bag. Wonder when we’ll have to bail their sorry butts out of trouble again. by the way, for all the nobama supporters i’m referring to world war 2. you may have briefly heard of it in your social sciences classes in grade school.
i’m sure if there were grand scale attacks on the US he would not know where to begin. but wait, he did state in an interview he’d consult his wife and grandmother. that makes me feel better……granny and michelle nobama deciding national defense. i’ll sleep better tonight.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am
Ms Fowler, this disgusting witch, is the wife of Don Fowler, the former chair of the DNC, who said that Gustav occuring during the RNC meant that God was on their side. Never mind the lives that were lost, and the billions of dollars of damage, and homes lost.
Anything for the good of Obama, right?
The DNC has gone down the way of garbage, trash, and slime, sinking fast, with Obama the liar fraud at the hhelm. Are you going to sink with this disgusting ship? Even rats have sense enough to jump off a sinking ship.
Posted by: liberati | September 11, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am
aurora — if you want the press to pursue that nonsense with no evidence whatsoever, then also have the press pursue things that have MORE evidence, such as Obama’s school registration showing his name is Soetoro and is Muslim, and Larry Sinclair’s accusations. Fair is fair. Vetting needs to happen, but fairly to both sides.
Posted by: liberati | September 11, 2008, 2:55 am 2:55 am
Please check this out … the most comprehensive page of information on Sarah Palin on the Internet … including videos of her saying her proposed $30 billion pipeline is the “will of God,” her saying a month ago she doesn’t know what the vice-president does, and her complaining four months ago that Hillary Clinton was whining about “sexist media” coverage -
http://dailysource.org/palin
It has in-depth research, audio clips, videos, and links to hundreds of articles, including many from newspapers and TV stations in Alaska. It has rare footage, including her telling the ‘08 convention of the Alaska Independence Party, whose aim is to give Alaska a vote on seceding from the U.S., to “keep up the good work.”
The level of research is unparalled. The site’s editors and volunteers include an Emmy-award winning CNN reporter, the former operating editor of the Monitor’s web site, the former head of NPRs News Blog and the Executive Director of the Online News Association -
http://dailysource.org/about/team
Please tell anyone about this who might want to know more. People deserve to know information about who they are voting for.
Posted by: Peter | September 11, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am
To Abort or NOT Abort is the question I guess??? Well this country and the entire world would be a heck of a lot better off tonight if Bush’s, old lady had washed him down a sink drain 62 years ago..5000 American soldiers would still be alive, millions of Iraqui’s would be alive and this “A” Hole would not be president..It was just a darn shame she did not do what needed to be done back in 1945 or 1946..And drop him…The world regrets her mistake tonight.
Posted by: P-51 jock | September 11, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am
http://www.stupidsheeple.com/index.php/2008090140/latest/bristol-palin-gone-wild.html
Posted by: Nevermind | September 11, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am
Tell these folks what you think Obama.
From ‘Dreams of My Father’,
“I CEASED TO ADVERTISE MY MOTHER’S RACE AT THE AGE OF 12 OR 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites”
From Dreams of My Father, ” I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASIVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER’S RACE”.
From ‘Dreams of my Father’, “The emotion between the races could never be pure….. the THE OTHER RACE (WHITE) WOULD ALWAYS REMAIN JUST THAT: MENACING, ALIEN AND APART”
From Dreams Of My Father, “never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. IT WAS INTO MY FATHER’S IMAGE , THE BLACK MAN, THE SON OF AFRICA, THAT I’D PACKED ALL THE ATTRIBUTES I SOUGHT IN MYSELF.
From Dreams Of My Father:
“THAT HATE HADN’T GONE AWAY,” he wrote, BLAMING WHITE PEOPLE,- SOME CRUEL, SOME IGNORANT, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”
Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 11, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am
McSame’s character isn’t much to write home about. I don’t think much of man who shacks up with a rich bimbo while still married to the first wife who was disfigured in an auto accident. Oh I get it, it’s different because he is a republican.
Posted by: tinahbee | September 11, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Palin is better qualified than Obama could ever hope to be….Palin has a list of accomplishments that includes getting rid of corrupt politicains (while Obama is a corrupt politican), Palin has a record of cutting taxes (while obama has raised them), Palin has a record of making tuff choices and sticking by them (while Obama wavers in the wind), etc` etc. What has Obama accomplished in office? I mean besides claiming that he was to dumb to vote correctly and now wants his voting record changed.
Posted by: chattyway | September 11, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am
I’m way past pro-choice, I am pro-abortion (there are alot of women who should never be having kids—i.e. drug addicts), but overall I like Palin’s record and I can’t stand how Obama has been trying to cheat his way thru the election.
Posted by: chattyway | September 11, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am
C. Fowler is another example of disgusting Democrats who would stoop to any low level to attack Palin. Obama leads the attack with his “pig & lipstick” remark. Now, Fowler follows up with the “zero-abortion qualification” remark. VOTE McCAIN/PALIN in November.
Posted by: ablanche08 | September 11, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am
Praise God that Matt Damon is infusing some logic into the national dialogue regarding the nation’s fawning over Barbie-doll Sarah Palin. (Yes, there’s actually a Palin Barbie-doll now.) Though she finished second in the Miss Alaska contest, polls show that she is captivating a salivating male audience across the nation. Males (more than females)are flocking to the pro-life, gun-totting, moose-hunting, painfully simple, political novice. No surprise there!
Posted by: Danny | September 11, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am
Carol Fowler must resign immediately. Her remark is an insult to intelligence and women. What does she know about people from South Carolina reasons for voting? typical democrat arrogancy.
Posted by: Sheila | September 11, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am
For Matt M —
“If you needed brain surgery, wouldn’t you want someone who had done it before?….What ‘brain surgery’ has Palin done??? Has she EVER had any experience in foreign relations?”
•••
She has run a business. She has run a city. She has run a state. She has commanded the Alaska National Guard. She has cooperated with both Canada and Russia on a range of issues. Neither Senator Obama nor Senator Biden have ever done any of those things, and we have no reason to assume either of them would do well in their first shot at holding an executive position. (So to answer Matt M’s question: yes, I would want someone who had done it before, and Sarah Palin fits that bill.)
*
In marked contrast to the two wannabes on the Democrat side, Governor Palin has performed remarkably well in each of the executive positions she has held in her career of public service, given that she has repeatedly beaten incumbents, and her approval rating is 80% or better among her constituents. (Matt M may wish the world accorded his opinion greater weight than all those Alaskans, but it doesn’t work that way.) Sarah Palin has done all of the above, Matt M seems to need to be reminded, while she was having and raising five kids and apparently making her marriage work just fine, thank you very much.
•••
•••
“Obama had 200,000 Germans chanting his name, he had the french president gushing over him and he just had a representative of TOny blair’s government practically endoring him to the point, per the BBC, where McCain called and complained yet Blaire did NOT retract the statement.”
•••
Please allow me to quickly concede the correctness and even brilliance of Matt M’s point that United States Senator Barack Obama should actually be running for President of Europe. Bonne chance. Bon voyage.
•••
•••
“What experience does she has in regulating financial markets, what educational background does she have in finance, economics, stocks, investments, bank regulation??? does she have any??? no. Barak has extensive educational background in all these areas and 7 years in the state senate and 2 as united states senator. IF you are looking for a brain surgeon, would you look for someone who went to medical school???? woudl you look for a folksy gal, or would you look for the guy who graduated from Harvard Medical school??? let’s get real. You can’t possibly have experience in all the areas that may come up while being president of the united states, but just as any doctor or engineer, what you fall back on then is your education, and palin has none. No safety net of knowledge and with her crashed the country.”
•••
What experience does he have in regulating financial markets as an executive? Good question. While Matt M is desperately attempting to come up with a reply that does not involve having to confess that the truth involves the number zero, perhaps he would be so kind as to explain the precise role of the POTUS in regulating financial markets, versus the role of the Treasury, the FTC, the Federal Reserve, and Congress,
*
What educational background does Senator Obama have in finance, economics, stocks, investments, bank regulation??? Does he have any??? No — or at least, not much, if anything, that is on the public record, that I could find. Contracts? Yes. Constitutional law? Definitely.
*
On the other hand, Governor Palin has actually exercised her veto pen and other authority to save great, green gobs of money for Alaska taxpayersl. They seem so upset about it that she has that gaudy 80% approval rating racked up already. Perhaps that has something to do with the fact that unlike some politicians, she did not seek to expand the powers of the government, but instead sent the savings back to the people in at least one, major instance.
*
Were I to look for a brain surgeon, I surely would not look in the Illinois State Senate, nor would I look in the United States Senate. I would care not in the least whether it was a man or a woman, nor whether or not my prospective surgeon was ”folksy.” I would, however, care a great deal that she or he had gone to medical school and not law school, and performed such operations before.
*
Okay, let’s get real, as Matt M insists. Senator Barack Obama has no “extensive educational background in all these areas.” During his first two years at Occidental College in Los Angeles, young Barry, as he was known at first, studied literature, arts, philosophy and social science — http://www.oxy.edu/x7025.xml — where, he said — http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct_archive/jan05/cover.php — “…he was still goofing off for the first two years of college.” He picked up his undergraduate degree in poli sci with a minor in international relations after he transferred to Columbia. He then went on to get his law degree at Harvard. That is not an “extensive educational background in all these areas,” no matter how Matt M may wish it were.
*
Let’s see: Matt M mentioned “foreign relations.” Senator Obama has no real experience in foreign relations as a practitioner. Senator McCain has lots, having met with many heads of state over a period of decades. Governor Palin, though, does have actual experience as a legitimate practitioner in foreign relations due to her having been Governor of Alaska, in which capacity she is the only Governor in the United States whose state shares an international border with two countries. Matt M and all too many others here appear to abysmally fail to comprehend that Senator Obama has no executive experience, yet that is exactly the sort of theater in which such people so recklessly wish to see him operate. Last, we should note in addition that Sarah Palin earned a college degree. That does not translate to, “[n]o safety net of knowledge.”
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 11, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am
Carol Fowler must resign immediately. Her remark is an insult to intelligence and women. What does she know about people from South Carolina reasons for voting? typical democrat arrogancy.
Posted by: Sheila | September 11, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am
This is how I see it:
Palin actually does things
Obama talks about them
This Democrat can’t wait to vote for McCain in November!
Posted by: Mark | September 11, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am
W. Reeves: You are a very ignorant person!! What makes you think that Republicans are better than Democrats? That’s an opinion not a fact!
Posted by: Mary | September 11, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am
7 supreme court justices, 5 Republican with 2 democrats voted infavor of taking away the state of Texas right to arrest women having abortions. It was one Democrat and one Republican who voted Not to take away Texas right to arrest women having abortions. The Vote of Roe Vs Wade was soley on A states right to arrest women having abortions. But the Republicans changed it’s meaning through the years and changed it into the abortion itself to be legal. yet the vote was about a states right to make it’s own decision. You want to change the law. You have to get the States right back through the same court system. Little tid bits of amendments do nothing to change a supreme court decision. If it did, bush would have been out of the white house a long time ago.
Posted by: mere | September 11, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am
W. Reeves: You sound like a very ignorant person! What makes you think that Republicans are any better than Democrats? That’s an opinion not a fact!! And I don’t know what make’s you people think that Sarah Palin is all that!! Because she’s not.!!
Posted by: Mary | September 11, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am
Mccain and his party are very crafty. they play double standards. they play dirth and nasty but when they get the heat they start firing complains for Obama to act. Has Mccain spoken acted against any foolishness of his party?
Posted by: krist | September 11, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am
To those of you who are bashing Bush.
Today we reached the seven year mark in US without a major terriort attach on the US. I pray that holds true longer.
Remember during Clinton years
The US Cole was attached
The US embasy in Aferica blown up
The first attack on World trade towers
And Clinton passed at least 12 times on capturing or killing Bin Laden.
So instead of being hateful (Bush-mainia) maybe you should thank President Bush.
Posted by: holly | September 11, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am
Why is Matt D. concerned about Palin’s foreign policy experience and not about Obama’s? Obama is running for President, Palin is running for Vice-President. Obama has NADA, ZIL, ZERO foreign policy experience. Matt D. should shut his mouth and be more concerned with Obama’s INEXPERIENCE IN FOREIGN POLICY than Palin’s. Maybe, Matt D. thinks Obama’s last trip around several countries where he was treated like A MOVIE STAR qualifies Obama for FOREIGN POLICY. If that is true, then Matt D. should run for President of the USA too. He has plenty of MOVIE STAR TREATMENTS in many foreign countries.
Posted by: ablanche08 | September 11, 2008, 5:45 am 5:45 am
Sounds more like that the DNC is trying hard to remind people that the only qualification of His Nothingness Zerobameus is he is black, attained his status by Affirmative Action.
Posted by: d0 | September 11, 2008, 5:46 am 5:46 am
Hey Mack: You think you’re a real jock. Nobody understands the corrupt, phony, two year long American election. Just so you know, As Australa, England, Germany and France among others are in the can in Afganistan for you on the front lines, maybe we should all pressure our governments to pull out. We don’t get any thanks from the likes of you when our soldiers die. In fact, many of you are too ignorant to know we’re even there. You don’t like us giving an opinion, tell your politicians to STOP saying that they are going to make a better place for America and the world – not that we believe them. You are a sorry lot.
Posted by: Outsider looking in | September 11, 2008, 5:48 am 5:48 am
Being black is Obama´s primary qualification.
Posted by: lone star | September 11, 2008, 5:49 am 5:49 am
I was stationed at a remote U.S. Air Force, radar station deep in the Alaska, wildernest a few years back and I remember kissing a MOOSE..And she was the spitting image of Sarah..They could be twin sisters, except my moose was a little thinner. They tend to put on a alot of weight in rutting season..As I recall her lipstick was frozen. Heck of a kisser loved to get deep throat. An Air Force Master Sergeant.
Posted by: P-51 jock | September 11, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am
South Carolina……… remind me, that’s the same state that voted against John McCain in 2000 because of a supposed illegitimate black child? And you people have the nerve to talk about the Dems in the state?
Posted by: dk | September 11, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
Republicans seem very fond of holding up Sarah Palin’s picture with one hand.
Posted by: jaxspp | September 11, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am
WHETHER U LIKE IT OR NOT ITS THE TRUTH.OR DO KNOW OF ANY OTHER QUALIFICATION.AMERICA DONT BE SELFISH THINK ABOUT THE REST OF THE WORLD.DNT LET CHINA $ RUSSIA TAKE OVER,BUILD UR ECONOMY N MILITARY.COS U R MAN’S LAST HOPE.
Posted by: 4real | September 11, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am
The democrats keep stepping in it.
Posted by: david | September 11, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am
Hey NARAL, why did you endorse Obama, a MAN and not Hillary ? BIG MISTAKE!!!! You will never see another penny from me. How do justify that? Women expect you to represent WOMEN. Now we have another chauvinist pig on a conquest of women. Has Obama ever advanced the career of a woman? Hillary was his biggest conquest, NARAL his 2nd.
Posted by: disillusioned2008 | September 11, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am
It is shameful that Carol Fowler actually said this, but what is beyond the pale is that she probably actually believes it. That is why Carol Fowler will always be groveling for NARAL money while the Sarah Palin is taking the political world by storm. Some people will believe anything you tell them for a chunk of special interest money. Enjoy the cash, Carol. I hope you think it was worth it.
Posted by: Sean O'Brien | September 11, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am
Why doesn’t CNN have the new up to date info about the Commissioner flack in Alaska? You have it. Because they are Palin Lovers and I think your network should call them on it.
Posted by: CodeSense | September 11, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Why is Matt D. concerned about Palin’s foreign policy experience and not about Obama’s….in the short trip Obama made to other nations we saw foriegn leaders gush overhim. On the BBC yesterday was a report that a senior Blair official gave a glowing review of Obama yet did not say a single word about McCain. A McCain representative complained. The french president said he would be ‘delighted” if Obama was president and 200,000 germans were chanting Obama’s. If Obama needs help from Europe he has presidents of european countries who are 100% behind him ALREADY on our side. That is GREAT for the US AND unlike McCAin, Obama picked a VP who help round out his resume with over a decade on the foreign relations committee. Biden is well skilled and educated in foreign powers, their leaders, their histories and their cultures.
Posted by: jess N boston | September 11, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
the democrats, showing their hate for women day after day.
Posted by: trettione | September 11, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
4real: Interesting comment: I guess it is just like Obama is popular because he is black but sounds white. I mean what other earthly qualification does he have other than eating arugula with the French president?
Posted by: stop2thnik | September 11, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Well the secrets out now. Abortion is the rite of passage for liberal females.
It would seem that to be a member of this cult you must kill an unborn child.
Posted by: paulejb | September 11, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review, 7 years as a state senator, 2 years as a US senator, graduate of Columbia University and Harvard. While i’m SURE Obama could be governor of a state that has less people than most big cities, do you think Palin has enough knowledge to be president of the Harvard Law Review???? no. not even close. She can’t do a job Obama did in COLLEGE. FAct is, nobody has the experience of being a president of the US except the president of the US and what you fall back on then is your education and she has none. She may very well be president and she no knowledge and nobody to fall back on (Biden has over adecade on the foreign relations committee) and we have huge businesses that need oversight a nd regulation decisions to be made on liquidity events of those the government has already bailed out or acquired. It is dangerous and irresponsible what republicans havedone prioritizing abortion over the safety and wellbeing of our country.
Posted by: Matt M | September 11, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
Matt Damon is correct, isn’t he? Tell me one point that he made that wasn’t the truth? The r epublicans of this nation are acting horrendously irresponsible with this ridiculous scenario of putting an uneducated person as a possible president. dont even compare a Harvard graduate to an uneducated person. You think 6 to 8 years of full time education in finance, constitutional law, foreign affairs, history of war, history of the cultures, stocks, wallstreet doesn’t matter??? would you choose a brain surgeon that has happened to cut open a head before without killing the patient or woudl you look for the graduate of harvard medical school?
Posted by: John | September 11, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Paul, nearly every republican president’s wife has been prochoice. Do you think Laura Bush got an abortion. Reasonable people think that forcing a girl to developoe a baby against her will is wrong.
Posted by: Jess | September 11, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
One thing is for certain, the 2008 Presidential Election has confirmed the fact that many Americans hold the perceptions and views of the past. As I read the various posts, it became crystal clear that the people, who present themselves as unbiased and inclusive, are only doing so, because it is politically correct (because I believe that none of these individuals would risk his or her careers and other positions by publicly expressing their “true” racist and sexist views).
I can’t understand how an individual, who says that he or she has ethical/moral/religious characteristics, doesn’t follow the biblical teaching that they profess to embrace, e.g., no distinction between Jew and Greek (no racism), male nor female (no sexism), we are all one (E Pluribus Unum) as evidenced in the book of Galatians, Chapter 3, Verse 28. On the other hand, I think I do understand somewhat, because based on America’s history, slavemasters were born-again Christians, but they did not abide by Christ’s teaching to treat servants in a right and equal manner with the awareness that they, too, had a Master in heaven.
It is clear that all of the racist and sexist thoughts are covered up with the scroll of religion; as Christ often said to the Scribes and the Pharisees, “you hypocrites”.
Posted by: M. J. | September 11, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Today we reached the seven year mark in US without a major terriort attach on the US…..I’m an engineer and I haven’t killed anyone in any of the planes I help design. Should I get a medal f or not screwing up. Oh yeah, it’s my job not to screw up. The only reason 9/11 happened is because of neglect. We had every bit of intelligence for it not to happen. So gee, after 3000+ of his citizens were killed bush decided to do his job in that area. I am so sick of republicans being so amazed with this. ANY future president will do their job when it comes to reading their freakn intelligence memos.
Posted by: matt M | September 11, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Wonderful Matt M, he has a record. So what??? What has he actually done??? Voting “present” isn’t much of a resume.
You what well being of our country? She has the record of that exact thing. Reducing government and putting the power of government where it belongs, with the people. Working against her own party, has any democrat done that? Oh yeah, Joe Lieberman has until every single liberal hated him for it.
The bonus is she is a real woman. Not some elite snob, like so many typical politicians.
Matt, why do liberals compare Obama (the one running for President) to Sarah (running for Vice President)? I don’t get it. Are you always in the habbit of comparing apples to oranges?
Posted by: Proudly wearing lipstick | September 11, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Fowler’s comment was extremely offensive to Gov. Palin and the rest of the common-sense citizens. But, her excuse is even worse, and shallow-minded…. are her constituents really that stupid? The DNC may yet bring in Hillary after Biden’s yesterday’s comment….. but it was Michelle that objected to her selection in the first place. Any way you look at it, racism and sexism rule this election process. Worse yet, the abortion crowd hate Gov. Palin for being pro-life and conservative… they wanted the first woman in the high offices to be liberal.
Posted by: SCOOTER | September 11, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Where is Liberal House speaker Pelosi Obama’s friend screaming resign when their
own DNC(Do Nothing Congress) makes a despicable comment. This Democratic Party doesn’t value life
they call the unborn child a mistake and just a tissue to toss in the waste bin.
Posted by: 2nfer | Sep 10, 2008 11:50:41 PM—————————– The DNC doesn’t value anything other than their own goals they want to achieve. They don’t even give a damn about the people they are supposed to represent. But they are good at blaming the republicans for their own failures.
Posted by: Cathy6224 | September 11, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
they wanted the first woman in the high offices to be liberal….I disagree. They wanted the first president to be educated and competent. I laughed at Damons comments for a second until I realized what he was saying was truth. PUtting an uneducated inexperienced person in the position of VP is worse than putting her up there as president becuase if McCAin dies, it’s President Palin, all alone. Putting this uneducated inexperienced women in the position of being in charge or the most powerful country, biggest economy and largest armed forces in the world is wreckless and irresponsible.
Posted by: Eric | September 11, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
I laughed at the Damon commentary for about a nanosecond, and then realized, Oh My God! this is true! not funny. not funny at all. ANyone who votes for a possible President Palin is antiamerican. Surely, no matter how m uch you want a ‘folksy’ president, surely even republicans must have the common sense to see how dangerous this is. For all the jokes about republicans being stupid, I do not believe in my heart of hearts they are really THAT stupid. Maybe they’ll defend her for now, but when the time comes, when they are in the ballot box, I think they’ll curse a nd be angry but I don’t think they will actually make a President Palin possible. I dont think they are THAT bad.
Posted by: John in the heartland | Sep 10, 2008 11:19:44 PM——————– So voting for Obama and his anti-american friends is more american? How stupid, Palin has more experience than Obama, book knowledge alone doesn’t qualify him, 143 days in the senate doesn’t qualify him, Illinois Senate (screwing over the poor in chicago with his buddy rezko) doesn’t qualify him. And his nastiness and condescending attitude doesn’t qualify him.
Posted by: Cathy6224 | September 11, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
Unqaulified, religious extremist, scandal-ridden liar. Sarah Palin, the change we need!
I”m John McBush, and approve of this message, and your forgeting about the last eight years, please give us another chance.
Posted by: Bob | September 11, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
Why aren’t any of the candidates talking about illegal aliens and border security?
Posted by: Oonogil | September 11, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
For the one issue Christiasn Conservatives thats all a candidates must profess to be anti-abortion, then that person could be Jack the Ripper otherwise and they would not care.
Posted by: Lukeskytalker | September 11, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
to: notouristtosc
As a SC native…the Fowlers don’t speak for me!
Posted by: Robert S. | September 11, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
One issue Palin ther bridge to nowhere with McCain trying to cross the bridge.
Posted by: Barney Phiffe | September 11, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
It’s like give a hair transplant to a monkey. It’s still a monkey.
Hair trnasplant =Biden
monkey = Obama’s policy.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Where is the outrage over such a statement? Where are the demands that she resign? Where is the self-righteous indignation? Where are the women’s groups crying foul over such a sexist statement (by a woman)? Why is it that only liberal democrats deserve such a response over such a despicable statement?
Posted by: Bob | September 11, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
To Justme:
You are an idiot. You have not one ounce of informed knowledge regarding positions you oppose. An informed, educated, smart individual will learn about all sides, and THEN make a decision on their stance. It would help if you would first learn how to spell correctly before voicing your views. I can’t believe you would complain about what the South Carolina democrat stated and then post something as hateful and evil as what you wrote. I also find it difficult to believe that you are “No longer a Democrat.” I don’t buy that you EVER WERE a Democrat, as any Democrat would NOT spout the hate that you did.
Posted by: Mindy Barrett | September 11, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Where are the women’s groups crying foul over such a sexist statement (by a woman)?…I dont understand your indignation. She is saying that republicans picked her primarily becuase she is anti abortion. She has been governor for less than two years, and she didn’t stand up to anyone. She lies. There has had to be not one but two stories about how she lied about herself at the convention. She has nothign. no experience, no education and she is the most extreme form of christianity there is which is exceedingly scary. She WAS picked because she is anti abortion. it was political pandering. If McCAin TRULY put country first he would have put someone on the ticket who could run it in the event of his demise. Listen to matt d’s comments. HE is spot on accurate. PUtting this person on hte ticket was wreckless and irresponsible.
Posted by: Jess | September 11, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
Palin and family passed that poor, special needs, child around like a football at the convention. And, as Governor, before she had this child, she cut funding to families of special needs children by 60%, in her state.
Like everything else, this child just seems to be another means to her own climb to the top.
Posted by: Intelligent voter | September 11, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Palin has more experience than Obama…..not even close. He was president o f the harvard law review in college. He knows constitutional law, tax law, federal and international trade law THAT well. Does Palin??? no. She couldn’t even hold a job he had in COLLEGE. She has been governor of a state that has no issue concurrent with the United States ,that gets its revenue from oil well leases. She knows nothing about balancing a tight budget on tax revenues, she knows nothing about constitutional law, trade law, wallstreet, foreign affairs (biden was on the armed services committee and the foreign relations commitee) nor did she do a single thing about healthcare anda medicaid and medicare are going belly up soon and she doesn’t even have so much as a single course in college math. You NEED books smarts to do jobs that require you to understand very specific sets of rules, laws and equations. Obama is FAR more qualified.
Posted by: Erio | September 11, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Oh, and let’s not forget Obama was a state senator f or 7 years in Illinois before he was US senator for the very crowded complex state of Illinois. Alaska doesn’t even have a single urban city. And she had to hire a city manager to help her run her affairs and a lobbiest to get federal funds and she has yet ot give b ack teh money for the bridge to nowhere that she flat out lied about.
Posted by: Eric | September 11, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Hey, lovemycountry….are you kidding!?Palin has more experience? I was a mid-level manager in a company that had more employees that the state of Alaska has people and controlled a budget of comparable size as Alaska’s state budget, but I’m NOT qualified to be VP or President, because of my exective experience, and NEITHER is Palin!!
Get some prespective…we are talking about our futures here.
Posted by: Intelligent voter | September 11, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I could be mayor of a small town, hell, I could be governor of Alaska. Honestly. I can see myself doing that. No big cities, no crime beside bootlegging and illegally hunting moose. You hire lawyers to draw up leasesand college money from oil companies as your very plush revenue to run a state that has not much of anything going on. Not much of a challenge folks. Could I decide on regulating the financial institutions that keep going belly up??? do I know what we should do about thier liquidity? and how the ripple effects of diluting investors will hurt the economy??? No. No. I want someone smarter than me. Obama is. Obama was president of teh Harvard Law Review. THE most wanted position in all of Harvard that only the smartest of the smart get and he got it. I want THAT GUY to make these decisions.
Posted by: Eric | September 11, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
This uppity woman thinks that because she wears lipstick and has not aborted any of her children that she has the qualifications to be president. That’s right, I said PRESIDENT. I’m an actuary and I’ve run the numbers on John Sydney McCain III and there’s a 43% chance that he WILL NOT survive his 1st term should he be elected. That number goes up to 76% mid-way through what would be his 2nd term. So, do I want Sarah Palin to be a heartbeat away from the presidency less than 2 years removed from being the mayor of Wasilla Alaska?
Who wrote this script? This is like a Hollywood comedy gone horribly wrong and the scariest thing about it is that on the top two issues facing America right now, the Economy and Energy independence, she is 100% in agreement with the Bush administration. She is George Bush with lipstick. Talk about the proverbial pig.
Posted by: Tommy Thompson | September 11, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Jeez, you Bush/McCain apologist are pathetic. McCain is the same man who in one joke insulted a then teenage Chelsea Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Janet Reno and now the repuglican party that completely lacks diversity is the champion of womens’ rights?!?! LOL…yeah, Democrats did the woman VP thing 20 years ago. Maybe 50 years from now you rePIGlicans will do the black presidential candidate thing!! We all know why McCain choose Palin, he believes completely in the stupidity of the same Americans that re-elected George Bush, the country’s favorite drinking buddy. You people are completely and utterly retarded!
Posted by: BrooklynGirl | September 11, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
The fact is Palin with her stint as Mayor and Gov of Alaska make her more qualified to be POTUS than Obama. From the time Obama was elected as Jr.Senator, which is basically 1/100th of the Senate body, he was already running for president. That is 143 days of experience as a Senator. He has never run anything in his life yet he thinks he’s ready to run the free world.
Here’s food for thought:
McDonald’s wouldn’t promote an employee to District Mgr after only 143 days on the job.
A Dr doesn’t become Chief of Staff after only 143 days as a Dr.
A teacher doesn’t become superintendent after only 143 days as a teacher.
2 yrs as Mayor and 20 months as Governor makes Palin 5 yrs more qualified than Obama.
No sane person would believe they were ready to be POTUS after being elected a Jr. Senator with 143 days on the job.
Posted by: Kay | September 11, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
That is 143 days of experience as a Senator…..no, actually, he was a state senator for 7 years. He was also president of the Harvard Law review. Obama is by far the most qualified candidate for president AND Obama is the ONLY person who has good ideas on how to make US a global competitor, how to lead teh green industrial revolution which neither Mccani nor his mate are even aware of, but hey, one is a senior citizen a nd the other hasn’t left alaska for most of her life so what do y ou expect. Obama is the ONLY real choice.
Posted by: Jess | September 11, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Not Having Abortion Is Palin’s ‘Primary Qualification’is a very low class comment from SC Democratic Chairwoman, Carol Fowler.
Her husband, Don Fowler a former Democratic National Committee Chairman said ” “Hurricane (Gustav) is going to hit New Orleans about the time (the Republican National Convention) starts. … That just demonstrates God is on our side.”
It seems Democrat Party does not have any person with a better education/knowledge to handle the Chairmanship.
My 7 year old daughter speaks better than this couple. They both need to go back to elementary school to learn again.
I am going to switch to Republican
Posted by: do navi | September 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Any knucklehead with a GED could be a mayor of a microscopic town or governor of alaska in the way she was. She had a laywer draw up lease agreements for oil wells, collected tons of money from oil companies and asked had a lawyer draw up an agreement to build a pipeline. She hired a city manager to help her run the microscopic town and she hired a lobbiest to her some of that pork, lied about it, and has yet to return the money. so she basically hired folks to do jobs she couldn’t. IRonically, someoen who has the know how to do the jobsshe had to hire outside help to do, woudl be Obama. She didn’t do a think about healthcare, there i s no crime, no tax revenues from tax payers, no infrastructure, no urban regions, no farms, no grazing, no cattle, no ranches, nothing like the contiguous United States. No experience or education in banks, finance, wall street, stocks, trade laws……shall I go on?? she has no experience in hardly anything and she has no education in it either. Her appointment is dangerous, wreckless, and highly irresponsible and speaks to the very poor judgement of Mccain
Posted by: say a prayer mcCain loses | September 11, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
NO LONGER A DEMOCRAT…. voting McCain/Palin for highest office in the land.
Obama knew what he was saying w/ the lipstick comment. Just watch his posture w/ the statement.
Posted by: Diane | September 11, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
No longer a Democrat. Embarrassed I ever was.
Posted by: Dan | September 11, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I one hundred percent agree with Mrs. Fowler. Being a mayor of a small town or a governor of a state with a very small population is not the same level of experience as a politician on the national level in Washington. She was hand picked because she is an evangelical. She believes that creationism should be taught in school. Let us get real about this; that goes against every thing our fore fathers fought for in this country, which is exactly why those evangelicals came to America for their religious freedom. The Americans who do not believe their beliefs should have that same promise from America now to be free to practice their religions. Religion should be taught at school and if you want your children to have it at school you have the right to send your children to a private religious school. Also the fact she chose to have her baby does not make her a great person or mother. I know many people who would make the same choice; she does not think others should get to choose, but that the government should choose for you. A great mother would want to wait a few years before entering such an important job that would take her away from a newborn. She is all about herself; that is why she is the kind of person who would be in a beauty contest. It would be like the Beverly Hillbillies come to Washington.Did she really finally get a college degree after attending 6 schools?
Posted by: scmother2 | September 11, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Dear Say a Prayer,
Please provide the facts. Make up untrue facts or rumors is an act of a highly iresponsible person. Please do some research and speak the true.
BTW god does not listen to the liars.
Posted by: where is the fact? | September 11, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Fowler and her husband who felt God had chosen the Democratic Party when the Hurrican was heading for the US during the start of the Republican Convention should SHUT UP & NEVER BE HEARD FROM AGAIN!!!
Posted by: lovingpolitics | September 11, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
The Palin pick is a showcase of John McCain’s impulsive and poor judgment. During a major economic downturn and a time of national security crisis, McCain picks someone whose only strength is Anti-Abortion/Anti-Reproductive rights?
Posted by: MatthewStLouis314 | September 11, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
This election is sickening! What does a person do when they don’t like either party? Would I be “un-American” if I didn’t vote? Should I vote for the lesser of the two evils? Check out the Wikipedia page on John McCain’s ex-wife…the one he had many, many affairs on – are your morals in question only if you are President when you were cheating on your spouse? And as for Obama – well, let’s just say that going to the same church for 20 years (and counting the pastor as a personal friend) and then claiming you never heard the pastor speak ill about the country you claim to love – well, lying isn’t less a sin than cheating! What’s a voter to do?
Posted by: boymomx5 | September 11, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
She is an ignorant lying pig WITH lipstick…..how about not running for VP to save her daughter from the hype….isn’t that a family value…or is it putting your own political career first.
Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Why does the Democratic party allow Mr&Mrs Fowler to speak? Everytime they speak someone has to come behind and run damage control. Maybe this couple can go on a speaking tour with Rev Wright. I am glad I no longer belong to the anti-God anti-family party.
Posted by: Kevin formerly a Democrat | September 11, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Kevin,
Anti-God Party?!??! Honey, you were NEVER a Democrat! You reek of the bible thumping, scripture quoting hypocrite party…squeal like a pig, repiglican!
Posted by: BrooklynGirl | September 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Obama cares so much about the poor he won’t even help his own half brother who lives on a dollar a week in a ghetto in Kenya. Obama made $4 million last year and he can’t even help his own family. Obama lives in a million dollar plus mansion while his brother lives in a shack! Obama wants me to thinks he cares about my problems……
Posted by: Katherine | September 11, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/ObamaBlueprintForChange.pdf
This link will take you to Sen. Barack Obama’s Blueprint for Change wherein he sets forth in detail the real changes he will make, if elected President of the United States, and how these changes will be implemented. I believe all those who support Senator Obama can help get him elected by printing out as many copies of the booklet as you can and distributing them to friends and neighbors. Remember, we have less than 2 months to bring Senator Obama’s message of real change to the American People. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: caliguy55 | September 11, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Dear Scmother2
Are you comparing Palin to Obama?
Joe Biden, Democratic Senator from Delaware, a state with about the same population as Alaska. He has been a senator for 35 years and he has not done much for the state of Delaware. he does not even understand his own religion’s teaching.(roman catholic. Please chekc it out.
Posted by: The facts | September 11, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Dear BrooklynGirl
You do not know me.
I was a Democrat as was my father. I read the Bible I do not thump it. I am not a pig. I am a human being. I do not believe that we evolved from dirt. You prove my point if you represent the thinking of the Democratic Party. The Democratic party has an anti-Christian bias.
Posted by: Kevin formerly a Democrat | September 11, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
“When you can’t beat them with ideas, try sleaze and personal attacks. ZeroBama is getting a little desperate.”
-Joaquin B.
Congratilations. You some how have managed to sum up the entire Rovian approach of the McCain team in one asinine statement.
Posted by: TXCourtney | September 11, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
1.Anyone who believes dinosaurs walked this earth with man and helped man with building the pyramids does not have my vote.
2. The man living in Africa is Obama’s half brother who was fathered by Obama’s estranged father who left Obama’s family when he was just a boy.
3. America has freedom of religion and I don’t understand all of this bashing against Muslims…by the way that is how you spell it.
4. Obama is not a Muslim..
5. Obama earned all of his money, he didn’t marry into it like John McCain.
6. McCain has 7 houses/condos.
7. John McCain cheated on his first wife with Cindy McCain…he left his first wife after he came back from Vietnam and realized she was disfigured from a horric car accident.
8. Why hasn’t John McCain introduced his adopted daughter to the world yet like Palin introduced her dysfunctional Brady bunch..oh could it be because she is not white?
9. I like the fact that the world respects Obama and it’ll be great once he is elected because Bush has alienated all of our allies. We can’t do the Iraq thing alone.
10. Go to the website http://www.whatreallyhappened.com and educate yourself on facts not fiction.
Posted by: Ryan | September 11, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Kevin,
Last time I checked the Democrat party represents ALL WALKS OF LIFE, not just Christians. Democrats aren’t anti-Christian, they’re anti-bigotry. Obviously you belong in the “small tent” Republican Party where only Christians are accepted. You must be proud…..4 more years of Bush because you put your personal religion over 95% of the country’s well being….just like a good little repiglican.
Posted by: BrooklynGirl | September 11, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
So, does this mean that McCain will reject every “outrageous and demeaning” statement made about Obama’s experience by a Republican state official? Will he reject all the Republican delegates that chanted “zero! zero!” at the RNC? Will he reject his own past statements or those of his running mate?
Whoops, nevermind that would be expecting some kind of ideological consistency from the Republican party. Silly me…
Posted by: TXCourtney | September 11, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
God Particle, of course Trig is the new Messiah. The Republicans don’t have an original thought to share between them, they had to steal “change” “celebrity” and “Messiah”.
Posted by: BrooklynGirl | September 11, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
God Particle, I guess that’s why McCain took issue with Obama supporting anti-pedophile legislation that would have prevented perverts like Mark Foley from molesting innocent children.
Posted by: BrooklynGirl | September 11, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
These are not the times for right-wing screwball. The world is aflame and we have been pondering the knocked-up daughter of a pert and uncannily confident Alaskan mediocrity who was elevated to a national ticket for the purpose of changing the conversation. The Republicans wanted a new conversation, and they got one. Juno in Juneau!
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“Whoops, nevermind that would be expecting some kind of ideological consistency from the Republican party. Silly me…”
Posted by: TXCourtney | Sep 11, 2008 11:59:22 AM
=========================================
To pick up on and extend your argument….
The portrait of Sarah Palin now emerging based on her actual record is the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of the portrait that McCain operatives, sympathetic pundits, and bloggers have been painting:
>She is NOT against federal ear-marks
>She RAISED taxes on Corporations in Alaska significantly
>She has worked hand-in-glove with Oil company lobbyists to open ANWR for drilling.
>She WAS in favor of setting a deadline for withdrawal from Iraq
>She WAS neither for or against the war in Iraq (she just prayed the soldiers, once fighting, were doing G*d’s work).
>She HAS never been an opponent of pork-barrel projects, rather she has been a most effective advocate for pork-barrel projects
>She has no opinion on America’s energy policy, other than that drilling in ANWR would be good for the Alaskan economy.
>She has lied about what she presents as a signature political decision: She WAS not opposed to the “Bridge to Nowhere”, in fact she was in favor of it…
I could go on. Her actual record will emerge over time…
In many ways her record of politics is a COMPLETE contradiction of the politics Sen. McCain ONCE represented.
She is NOT a maverick, she is a provincial, Alaska-First Nativist.
SHE has NOT run Alaska as if it were one state among many in the United States.
She HAS run Alaska as if it were a sovereign, but separate CLIENT state of the United States – like other oil-rich foreign countries,i.e. like Saudi Arabia or like Iraq.
It will be interesting to see if the McCain campaign can pull off this bizarre magic trick of making the real Sarah Palin disappear behind their fabricated portrait…
I’m making no predictions.:-(
Posted by: niccolo m@cchiavelli | September 11, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
i can not believe we live in a world where so many advocate the murder of babies. here’s some advice LIBERAL PIGS.
1. if you do not want to get pregnant use birth control. or are you liberals too stupid ? could it be that since there is a time limit on welfare that’s why we see more abortions now. by the way you can blame clinton for that. not the little money makers they used to be huh !!
2. if you do get pregnant look to adoption instead of killing an innocent child. but then again god forbid you have to stay off booze and weed for nine months.
3. if you don’t want a baby and can’t figure out how to use birth control or can’t afford it, CROSS YOUR LEGS. for the morons that’s where one leg rests over top of the other. if you can’t figure it out ask for help.
it’s that simple. by the way, carol fowler is a gross and pathetic pig. this woman is an example of the phrase ” typical white trash fashion”
she needs to come equiped with a mute button. what a pathetic piece of low class trash. let them keep derailing nobama.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Sarah Palin was counseled by an ethics adviser on the gravity of the allegations against her in the burgeoning Trooper-Gate scandal — and encouraged to apologize — letters reviewed by the Wall Street Journal show.
A former U.S. attorney, Wevley Shea, wrote two letters (pdf) to the Alaska governor, once in July and once in early August, stating that Palin’s “‘political advisors’ have given you poor cousel; the situation is now grave. . . I am extremely concerned about certain ‘wolves’ if my recommended action is not taken immediately.”
Shea gave the following recommendations to Palin in a letter dated July 24:
Apologize for not personally terminating Commissioner of Public Safety Walt Monegan. Apologize for your statements regarding Commissioner Monegan in Press Release no. 08-125. Apologize, with Todd, for overreaching or peceived overreaching on Trooper Mike Wooten. Terminate any “state advisor” who addressed Trooper Wooten with Commissioner Monegan. Withdraw former Kenai Police Chief Chuck Kopp’s name as Commissioner of Public Safety. Do not, in writing [as in Press Release no. 08-125], “define” the credibility of state employees.
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
god particle-
how is it that it’s ok for him to have tasered his stepson, drank and drove in his car, and threatened the life of her father. but then again, you advocate the murder of innocent babies. read my posting just above your words of wisdom.
you seem to think america is terrible. here’s some advice. get the hell out of here. don’t sink so low as to attack a baby with down syndrome. most of us real americans don’t share your views .
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Tracey:
“1. if you do not want to get pregnant use birth control. or are you liberals too stupid ? could it be that since there is a time limit on welfare that’s why we see more abortions now. by the way you can blame clinton for that. not the little money makers they used to be huh !!”
Ummm, if you right wing extremist taught your children that birth control not only prevents pregnancies but also STDs, you republican hicks wouldn’t have the highest teen pregnancy rate in red states.
“2. if you do get pregnant look to adoption instead of killing an innocent child. but then again god forbid you have to stay off booze and weed for nine months.”
And since you and your party is so against abortion, name one program that Republicans have created in the last 8 years to PREVENT unwanted pregnancies. Oh you can’t? Can you name one program the Republicans have drafted to make adoptions easier? Oh…you can’t do that either?
“3. if you don’t want a baby and can’t figure out how to use birth control or can’t afford it, CROSS YOUR LEGS. for the morons that’s where one leg rests over top of the other. if you can’t figure it out ask for help.”
Well birth control could be as easy to obtain as let’s say…ummm viagra! Oh that’s right, McCain thinks that making love trumps a women’s ability to protect herself.
“she needs to come equiped with a mute button. what a pathetic piece of low class trash.”
And can you believe that McCain choose that pathetic piece of low class trash as his running mate? Oh goodie, Palin’s other teen daughter can de-flower right there in the WH.
Posted by: BrooklynGril | September 11, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
======================================
nick-olio, did they let you out of that other blog already? More Palin tears, huh.
She is democrats worse nightmare. She WILL get ANWR open and get our gas prices down even though Obammy and Peelosi will fight it. Thank YOU, Vice President Sarah Palin.
She truly cares for people, not like Bamma and OBiden.
Bring HER on!!!!
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 11, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Hey – check out this video. The language is Swedish, but it shows McCain’s arrival from Vietnam. You can hear his name clearly and see him limping. I think you have to cut and paste it…
http://svt.se/svt/play/video.jsp?a=1243728
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 11, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
hey and she’s also pretty hott
http://www.hollywood-newsroom.com/news/sarah-palin-nude-hot-and-nsfw-get-out-the-vote/
Posted by: jonze | September 11, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
=================================
Brooklingal, I am so glad that I don’t live in New Jerk City or don’t ever have to go there.
Where I live, we are free to hunt, shoot, fish, and protect ourselves. I guess what I am trying to say, we HAVE a Constitution.
Abortions are the escape of fools. When someone gets pg, why not just have the baby and put it up for adoption? Like someone said, you would have to “abstain” for 9 months.
NY liberals – sheeeeeeeeesh.
VP Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 11, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Hey – check out this video. The language is Swedish, but it shows McCain’s arrival from Vietnam. You can hear his name clearly and see him limping. I think you have to cut and paste it…
http://svt.se/svt/play/video.jsp?a=1243728
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 11, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
To
BrooklynGril-
it’s tracy not tracey. also, is it Gril or Girl ? never mind you’ll probably say Gril anyway so you don’t appear to be so stupid. looks like you’re spelling skills are about as good as your comeback. by the way, as for being a hick. i probably pay more in taxes than you make in a year. correct me if i’m wrong, but isn’t the congress predominately democratic ? what have they done in their infinite wisdom and stellar ratings (approval of 15% roughly ) to decrease teen pregnancy ? by the way a lot of abortions are by women in their 20′s and 30′s. good reasoning by the way . you liberals use not having freebie programs to learn about adoption or birth control to advocate abortion. how about good old fashion self accountability. but then again that’s not done for you it requires a conscience. and doesn’t come in the form of a government handout. also, now you may not appreciate it, but i’m nice enough to help you out anyway . if you do not know what predominately , accountability, or conscience means you can find it in a dictionary. you know, the big book with letters down the side with a lot of words in it.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
LarryMan-
right on !! liberals are pathetic. by the way, you may like my last response to BrooklynGril. i know you called her a gal but i’m not sure. she or he spelled girl wrong.
McCain/Palin 08
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
The qualifications of Obama and Palin have created quite a dilemma…do we hope McCain doesn’t pass away while in office, or do we hope Obama does pass away in office?
Posted by: City Jim | September 11, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
This does not surprise me. Look how they treated a formal fist lady (Hillary). They could careless about the first Gov of Alaska.
Posted by: willie | September 11, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
I love it. The Clintons have Obama by the balls. They are meeting with Clintons to discuss their roles in the WH to help him win the election.
Posted by: Quincy | September 11, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Brooklyn”Gril”
just to let you know where you wrote “you and your party is” it should have been “your and your party are”. in correct english “you are ” is proper . “you is” would be considered incorrect. “Is” comes after he or she . just another helpful hint. you’ll get it right eventually. maybe one day you’ll be as articulate as a fifth grader.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
tracy,
What are some kind of freaking English teacher or something. Lay off “Brooklyn Gril”….It is condescending, arrogant, self-righteous people like your that personify Republican conservatives.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I loved this article and it drives home what I believe Obama supporters need to remember. The Palin Panic is all about smoke & mirrors. Palin was picked as a publicity stunt to get votes & nothing more. The right-wingers have clung to the notion that a 44 year old, who allowed herself to get pregnant, has done this country some kind of service by bearing another handicapped child who will need special ed. and special services his entire life. For some reason, using birth control (or sterilization) would have seemed the better decision, given the fact she already had 4 children. The fact that her 17 year old daughter is now pregnant shouldn’t surprise anyone either. Abstinence is a good term, but not very practical in reality. Palin is all of the things pro-choice women like myself get sick in the stomach about. She will NOT get the Hillary votes and the McCain/Palin ticket won’t be getting mine.
Posted by: Kasey | September 11, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
indy_voter-
no, actually i am a detective. i just know how to properly speak the language. by the way, what are some should be what are YOU some. and as for condescending and arrogant. at least you can’t say i’m not the best at what i am. but truthfully i am a very nice person. i just do not advocate killing children . but hey !! at least a republican keeping you safe from terrorists gives you the ability to write your response.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Brooklyngril, God Particle,
I dont know you but read your comments i can tell that you are a die-hard Democrats and have no idea what you are talking about. I can tell that if Democrat Party put an animal out there running for office you would vote for it anyway.
You are just like most of other Democrats: angry, narrow mind, using uneducated languages and untrue rumors to put down your opponents.
Keep in mind who was the first sitting president to cheat on his wife and have sex with the intern at the highest office of America. The list of unethical Democrats is very long too.
I have a question for you. For national security reason (my most concern for this election) will Mr. Obama decide to bomb Kenya if the terrorists use Kenya as its base? Keep in mind his step mother, grandmother, uncles, brothers and sister still live there. I really doubt it. I hope it will never happen so that our children can be safe. Remember we have unfold more than 20 terrorist cell right here in the USA since September 11, 2001
President Kennedy once said:”Ask not what your country can do for you. but what you can do for your country.”
Please ask Mr. Barrack Hussein Obama what he has really done for this country before he asks this country voting for him. Please don’t bring up community organizer, state senator or 173 days as US Senator. BTW during the time he was/is a Senator he has never come up with a bill that would benefit the average American except for his own interest. If you do have the facts please post it on!
I hope you dont read this with an angry attitude. Please vote for America not for a party. look deep into each candidate and make your call. Thanks
Posted by: the facts | September 11, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
indy_voter-
almost forgot. your phrase self righteous people like your that personify ….. you’re going to be mad. should be self righteous people like you that personify. if i can be of further assistance (help) just let me know.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
To ABORT or NOT ABORT???That is the question…Had Barbara Bush, spit little junior down sink 62 years ago the world would be a better place today and millions of people would still be alive..And this “A” hole would never have been president..There some times is a need to Abort and in Bush’s case it would have been justified..And the world would have never heard of this slug.
Posted by: P-51 jock | September 11, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
For someone who professes to talk the language…your post has many grammatically erors….But I don’t want to point them out since I am not as arrogant, self-righteous, and condescending as you. Nor do I profess to be a nice person. As for killing children…..I assume you consider abortion in all cases killing children. Better to let them be born and abandon the mother when she needs a little help, right?
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Tracey,
Thanks for the grammatical help. I will certainly try harder on my next post..
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
the facts,
You sound like George Castanza. “It is not a lie if you truly believe it.”…Unfortunately, you wrap yourself in god and country with it…Republicans have driven this country to cliff under George Bush and now McCain\Palin want to lead us over it…
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
indy_voter -
why not point them out if you can ? i did make a few grammatical errors on purpose just to see if some of the responders actually could point them out. curious i guess. maybe if i write ” done do lemme know what i done did wrongses ” you can. you could not and did not point them out before i corrected YOU. so bring it on. as for the mother needing help……..would that be in the form of a government freebie. i resent paying a fortune in taxes because so many need a little help. take some accountability for your actions .
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
indy_voter-
good grief !!!!!!!!!!!!!! it’s tracy not tracey. it’s a five letter name. get it right.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
tracy,
You said you’re a detective. Shouldn’t you be hunting down bad guys or something instead of correcting some anonymous blogger’s grammar? Hope you’re not using your department’s computer…By the way, I also purposely put in grammatical errors. Hope you can find them…
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
OMG !
indy_voter. please!!! you’re killing me. it’s not grammatically erors. it’s grammatical errors. or errors in grammar. errors is the correct spelling. why are liberals so uneducamateded. just a joke . i meant uneducated.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Tracey,
“as for the mother needing help……..would that be in the form of a government freebie. i resent paying a fortune in taxes because so many need a little help. take some accountability for your actions .”
What do you consider a government freebie? I understand your resentment…but leaving them to fend for themselves and die isn’t the answer either is it. Perhaps, abortion wouldn’t a bad thing in that situation, huh? You’d only be killing one person now instead of two later….You’d also eliminate the risk of them having resentment and turning on society, right? Just trying to be logical..
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
actually i am at home. i know better than to use a work computer. where are you ? a cubicle ? and my question is why are you so interested in what i have to say ? tell me what your errors in grammar were that you did on purpose. or can’t you ? show me your errors first and i will show you mine. give me an answer on all of them. respond on all errors you made. do it fast. because if you don’t it will show everyone you had to take the time to look all of them up and correct yourself. i give you ten minutes. ready, set, go !!
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
======================================
A real brilliant post by P-51 jock. You wouldn’t make a pimple on a P-51 jock’s butt.
Bush’s mother abort? Well, at least she was MARRIED at the time. That’s more than we can say for Obammmy’s mother.
Bush has kept the country safe, so safe that an idiot like you can post drivel on a public board.
Hey, Homeland Security, come get this nutcase!!!!
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 11, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
indy_voter-
tick tock tick tock. time’s a wastin’.
you were just here. where is your response ? please fill my curiosity.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
LarryMan-
RIGHT ON !!!!!!!!!!!!!! great comment. Nobama is another product of the freebie food stamp stampede. he’s a disgrace.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
indy_voter-
where are you ? why haven’t you responded to me ? jeepers !! look at that. time is up. thrall me with your great knowledge base.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Republican Family Values
STOP REPUBLICAN PEDOPHILIA
* Republican legislator Robert A. McKee pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography.
* Republican legislator Scott Muschany was charged with molesting a 14-year old girl.
* Republican chief of staff Eric Feltner pleaded guilty to showing pornography to a 13-year old girl.
* Republican presidential campaign official Matthew Joseph Elliott was convicted of sexual exploitation of a child.
* Republican Party Chairman Donald Fleischman was charged with two counts of child enticement, two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a child and a single charge of exposing himself to a child.
* Republican prosecutor John David Roy Atchison was arrested for soliciting sex from a 5-year old girl, then killed himself three weeks later. At the time of his arrest, Atchison was an “assistant U.S. attorney” appointed by President Bush’s attorney general.
* Republican city councilman John Bryan killed himself after police began investigating allegations that he had molested three girls, including two of his adopted daughters, ages 12 and 15.
* Republican legislator Ted Klaudt was charged with raping girls under the age of 16.
* Republican city councilman Joseph Monteleone Jr. was found guilty of fondling underage girls.
* Republican congressional aide Jeffrey Nielsen was arrested for having sex with a 14-year old boy.
* Republican County Commissioner Patrick Lee McGuire surrendered to police after allegedly molesting girls between the ages of 8 and 13.
* Republican prosecutor Larry Corrigan was arrested for soliciting sex from 13-year old girls.
* Republican Mayor Jeffrey Kyle Randall was sentenced to 275 days in jail for molesting two boys — ages ten and 12 — during a six-year period.
* Republican County Board Candidate Brent Schepp was charged with molesting a 14-year old girl and killed himself three days later.
* Republican Congressman Mark Foley abruptly resigned from Congress after “sexually explicit” emails surfaced showing him flirting with a 16-year old boy.
* Republican executive Randall Casseday of the conservative Washington Times newspaper pleaded guilty to soliciting sex from a 13-year old girl on the internet.
* Republican chairman of the Oregon Christian Coalition Lou Beres confessed to molesting a 13-year old girl.
* Republican County Constable Larry Dale Floyd pleaded guilty to charges of soliciting sex from an 8-year old girl. Floyd has repeatedly won elections for Denton County, Texas, constable.
* Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.
* Republican Party leader Bobby Stumbo was arrested for having sex with a 5-year old boy.
* Republican petition drive manager Tom Randall pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 14, one of them the daughter of an associate in the petition business.
* Republican County Chairman Armando Tebano pleaded guilty to fondling a 14-year-old girl.
* Republican teacher and former city councilman John Collins pleaded guilty to sexually molesting 13 and 14 year old girls.
* Republican campaign worker Mark Seidensticker is a convicted child molester.
* Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
* Republican Mayor Tom Adams was arrested for distributing child pornography over the internet.
* Republican Mayor John Gosek was arrested on charges of soliciting sex from two 15-year old girls.
* Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.
* Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
* Republican Committeeman John R. Curtin was convicted of molesting an underage teenage boy and sentenced to serve six to 18 months in prison.
* Republican anti-abortion activist Howard Scott Heldreth is a convicted child rapist in Florida.
* Republican zoning supervisor, Boy Scout leader and Lutheran church president Dennis L. Rader pleaded guilty to performing a sexual act on an 11-year old girl he murdered.
* Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.
* Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
* Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
* Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.
* Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded no contest to having an inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.
* Republican advertising consultant Carey Lee Cramer was sentenced to six years in prison for molesting two 8-year old girls, one of whom appeared in an anti-Gore television commercial.
* Republican fundraiser Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
* Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
* Republican Congressman Donald “Buz” Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.
* Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.
* Republican activist Mark A. Grethen convicted on six counts of sex crimes involving children.
* Republican campaign chairman Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child and was arrested again five years later on the same charge.
* Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working as a congressional page.
* Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.
* Republican Judge Ronald C. Kline pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer.
* Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.
* Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
* Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. “Republican Marty”), was taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.
* Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
* Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported in the media.
* Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced prison after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
* Republican talk show host Jon Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing his genitals to an 11 year old girl.
* Republican anti-gay activist Earl “Butch” Kimmerling was sentenced to 40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.
* Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.
* Republican election board official Kevin Coan was sentenced to two years probation for soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.
* Republican politician Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
* Republican legislator Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 (i.e. exposing himself to children).
* Republican anti-abortion activist John Allen Burt was found guilty of molesting a 15-year old girl.
* Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.
* Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault on a teenage girl.
* Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to molesting his two daughters.
* Republican Councilman and former Marine Jack W. Gardner was convicted of molesting a 13-year old girl.
* Republican County Commissioner Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.
* Republican City Councilman Fred C. Smeltzer, Jr. pleaded no contest to raping a 15 year-old girl and served 6-months in prison.
* Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and fined $18,000.
* Republican parole board officer and former Colorado state representative, Larry Jack Schwarz, was fired after child pornography was found in his possession.
* Republican strategist and Citadel Military College graduate Robin Vanderwall was convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting sex from boys and girls over the internet.
* Republican city councilman Mark Harris, who is described as a “good military man” and “church goer,” was convicted of repeatedly having sex with an 11-year-old girl and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
* Republican businessman Jon Grunseth withdrew his candidacy for Minnesota governor after allegations surfaced that he went swimming in the nude with four underage girls, including his daughter.
* Republican campaign worker, police officer and self-proclaimed reverend Steve Aiken was convicted of having sex with two underage girls.
* Republican director of the “Young Republican Federation” Nicholas Elizondo molested his 6-year old daughter and was sentenced to six years in prison.
* Republican president of the New York City Housing Development Corp. Russell Harding pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer.
* Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A. Dasen Sr., was found guilty of raping a 15-year old girl. Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.
* Republican Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld authorized the rape of children in Iraqi prisons in order to humiliate their parents into providing information about the anti-American insurgency. See excerpt of one prisoner’s report here and his full report here.
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Wake up conservative women. You are being used.
Ask yourself why Roe vs. Wade is still around. From 2000-2006, the situation was ideal for making abortion illegal, with Bush as president, a conservative majority on the Supreme Court and a conservative majority in the legislature. What you got was a conservative trifecta that did nothing.
Do you really think Sarah Palin has the power to overturn Roe v. Wade? This is the carrot on the stick Republicans use to get you to the voting booth. There is no political advantage for Republicans to make this issue go away. If abortion was no longer on the table, our leadership would actually have to look at the plight of the poor and problems with the economy, not to mention healthcare coverage, gender inequality and support for working mothers.
Stop wasting your vote on this red herring issue. It will never change because powerful conservatives don’t want it to change.
Posted by: mblack1 | September 11, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
tracey,
Sorry….As hard as it might seem I had better things to do…Glad to see you missed me…As far as my knowledge base…don’t want to waste it on you..you know it all it already..
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
SARAH PALIN’S OWN WORDS: As for that VP talk all the time, I’ll tell you, I still can’t answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day?
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
• NEWS ALERT • NEWS ALERT •
Trig Palin is the new Messiah THE SECOND COMING IS HERE! God sent his son in the form of a downs syndrome baby to test our faith.
ALL GOOD FUNDAMENTAIST CHRISTIANS SHOULD HEAD TO ALASKA…POST HASTE!
And save money with a one way ticket
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
“why are liberals so uneducamateded. just a joke . i meant uneducated.”
Republican teachers.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
The biggest science experiment in human histoy, The Hadron Collider experiment was almost blocked by a scared, vocal minority of Right Wing Religious Cooks convinced that turning on the LHC would spell doom for the earth. Yet some simple research and background in fairly basic science should have been enough to allay the fears generated by the LHC project.
Perhaps the Right wingers attack on science is having an affect in that our students lag the all other first world nations in science education. And now we have a VP candidate who actually supports the nonsense of Creationism. If you believe in creationism then you would have to reject all of Physics, Biology, Geology, Astonomy, Archeology, Mathematics and on and on.
Palin is a member of the
“Flat Earth Society”
Obama Biden ‘08
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
I can`t believe , Barack Obama was over Bill Clinton`s office and asked him to help him, Why!! It seems Obama does not know how to control American when he is president, If he win and will he ask Bill to help him again. Is it worth for him to be president, No way. Bill ,Please dont help Obama , He alway say he knows how to control many things , why did he ask Bill for help. Just tell Obama ” Go hell”.
I believe McCain knows how to control U.S.A , Not Obama , Obama is a whiner !!! Let vote McCain and Palin!!!1
Posted by: Buck | September 11, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
indy_voter-
in that brief time what did you have better to do ? never mind, i’m afraid of the answer. and if your time is so full and invaluable why are you bothering to respond to me ? detectives look at every angle. i haven’t even started . anyway……….what are your purposeful grammatical errors. and by the way, i usually don’t do this. guess i’m just bored with my two year old visiting with her grandparents and my husband out of the country fighting to save lives from terrorists. at least it makes for a semi-entertaining afternoon.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Buck, your post is chalk full Bad english and worse reasoning… another dumb Republican!
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
======================================
God Particle, glad that you spend all your time looking up this trivial crap.
It’s better than locking yourself in the bathroom with your daddy’s Playboy.
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 11, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
LarryMan-
be fair. it’s not his daddy’s playboy. even you should see this . it’s his playgirl !!!!!
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Something is very strange that democrats favor baby killing but they also love rudely criticizing how a mother is going to raise her down’s syndrome kid.
Sen. Joe Biden is not suitable for United States vice-presidential candidate as the man did not raise his son as a straight and decent person according to Democrats’ standard for vp nominee, yet the liberals and Liberal Media kept their mouth shut about this scandal! Washington Post reported on 08/24/08:
A son and a brother of Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. (D-Del.) are accused in two lawsuits of defrauding a former business partner and an investor of millions of dollars in a hedge fund deal that went sour, court records show. The legal actions have been playing out in New York State Supreme Court since 2007, and they focus on Hunter and James Biden’s involvement in Paradigm Companies LLC, a hedge fund group. Hunter Biden, a Washington lobbyist, briefly served as president of the firm.
Barack Hussein Obama has shown very poor judgment and awful taste for his vp picking not to say his blank contribution to his own career and this country as US Senator. It’s laughable for a so called progressive party supporting such a pair as their presidential election nominees.
Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
1) Why are you refusing to testify in an investigation of abuse of power now when you promised to testify before?
(2) Why did you inquire into your ability to ban books when you were mayor?
(3) What books did you want to ban?
(4) Do you believe in the theory of evolution? Why or why not?
(5) Why do you oppose abortion even in case of rape or incest?
(6) You’re for “abstinence only” education, did you tell ever think to tell Bristol about the wonders of a third sock?
(7) Why did you say your daughter “chose” to keep her baby when you would prevent anyone else from even having a choice at all?
(8) Tell me what specific decisions you made in regard to the Alaska National Guard?
(9) Tell me why your state’s proximity to Russia gives you particular expertise toward that nation? And while we’re at it, who is the president of say Azerbaijan?
(10) Did you ever attend a convention of the Alaska Independence Party?
(11) Was your husband a member of the Alaska Independence Party? Why? And why did you address their recent convention, given their secessionist views?
(12) Do you believe in converting gays through prayer?
(13) Why were you in attendance at a church where the leader of Jews for Jesus excused bombings against Israelis because they had yet to accept Jesus?
(14) Why did you not walk out or protest? Do you believe this to be true?
(15) Seriously, what’s up with you and cats? Are you going to get Bill Frist a cabinet position?
(16) How’d you get that “per diem” money for staying home in your employment contract with Alaska? I’ve got to get that clause in my next contract. I’d like to bill ABC for those times when I’m not working but sleeping. In fact, I’m sleeping through this interview right now, ka-ching!
(17) When you were mayor of Wasilla, did your town charge rape victims for their own forensic examinations? WTF?
And here’s another: What made you change from a mayor who scored millions in earmarks for tiny Wasilla, into an earmark reformer?
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
=====================================
Great one, Tracy. And I caught that above about your husband in the military.
WE SALUTE YOU, and him.
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 11, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
tracy,
The truth is I really don’t care…Just like you don’t care what I write either…It just seems that, like most conservatives, you just seem to take a little too much pleasure in trying to belittle folks…I would expect better from a detective..Anyway, as you say it makes for a semi-entertaining afternoon. So go ahead and correct my grammar if it makes you happy.
P.S> I do wish your husband returns safely. God bless.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
LarryMan-
thanks, i adore my husband and his courage. my grandfather was a soviet vet of the battle of stalingrad. what our men are fighting for gives these bad cases of cranial rectal inversion the right the spew their garbage. my grandfather fought the german sixth army so we could eventually come her. Tracy is my american name. and i am so proud of it.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
indy_voter-
so why haven’t you showed me your errors ? and as for hoping my husband who is a WAR HERO and navy cross recipient comes home safe…….. spare me . it would make no difference to you except another death that could be blamed on bush. by the way, how many men died in vietnam ? a democratic driven war by LBJ . my husband is more of a man than you could ever fantasize about being.
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
indi_voter,
Please read my comments again. I did not address it to you but you are too nosy to reply to me. Please keep all the untrue facts with you and pass it to your children. I don’t want to discuss with you.
Thanks
Posted by: The Fact | September 11, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
tracey,
See…that is what I got for trying to be decent with you…You act like a jackass…I guess I shouldn’t have expected less..
Posted by: indy_voter | September 11, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
If you are supporting McSame & Caribou Barbie you all into 1 or 4 categories…
1. You are an unabshed Racist
2. You are evil… Drill Baby Drill
3. You are as dumb as a rock
4. You are brainwashed by your fundamentalist preacher
Obama -Biden ’08
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
===================================
GodPartofcrap, most of the stuff you dig up come from dailykos or democratunderground. Try coming up with something new. Those of us who know the truth, aren’t buying it. The rest are democrat dweebs anyway.
All of those issues have been explained, I don’t have time on my hands like you to dispute each.
I am damn thankfull for one thing about Governor Palin. She NEVER voted “PRESENT”.
And she can shoot the eyes out of an idiot at 500 yds.
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 11, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
BarleyAMan
You would be a number 3!
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Liberals tend to ask a lot of why’s to show their uppity when they need to build some sort of hedge to defend themselves and blur the public focus.
Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
STOP REPUBLICAN PEDOPHILIA
* Republican legislator Robert A. McKee pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography.
* Republican legislator Scott Muschany was charged with molesting a 14-year old girl.
* Republican chief of staff Eric Feltner pleaded guilty to showing pornography to a 13-year old girl.
* Republican presidential campaign official Matthew Joseph Elliott was convicted of sexual exploitation of a child.
* Republican Party Chairman Donald Fleischman was charged with two counts of child enticement, two counts of contributing to the delinquency of a child and a single charge of exposing himself to a child.
* Republican prosecutor John David Roy Atchison was arrested for soliciting sex from a 5-year old girl, then killed himself three weeks later. At the time of his arrest, Atchison was an “assistant U.S. attorney” appointed by President Bush’s attorney general.
* Republican city councilman John Bryan killed himself after police began investigating allegations that he had molested three girls, including two of his adopted daughters, ages 12 and 15.
* Republican legislator Ted Klaudt was charged with raping girls under the age of 16.
* Republican city councilman Joseph Monteleone Jr. was found guilty of fondling underage girls.
* Republican congressional aide Jeffrey Nielsen was arrested for having sex with a 14-year old boy.
* Republican County Commissioner Patrick Lee McGuire surrendered to police after allegedly molesting girls between the ages of 8 and 13.
* Republican prosecutor Larry Corrigan was arrested for soliciting sex from 13-year old girls.
* Republican Mayor Jeffrey Kyle Randall was sentenced to 275 days in jail for molesting two boys — ages ten and 12 — during a six-year period.
* Republican County Board Candidate Brent Schepp was charged with molesting a 14-year old girl and killed himself three days later.
* Republican Congressman Mark Foley abruptly resigned from Congress after “sexually explicit” emails surfaced showing him flirting with a 16-year old boy.
* Republican executive Randall Casseday of the conservative Washington Times newspaper pleaded guilty to soliciting sex from a 13-year old girl on the internet.
* Republican chairman of the Oregon Christian Coalition Lou Beres confessed to molesting a 13-year old girl.
* Republican County Constable Larry Dale Floyd pleaded guilty to charges of soliciting sex from an 8-year old girl. Floyd has repeatedly won elections for Denton County, Texas, constable.
* Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.
* Republican Party leader Bobby Stumbo was arrested for having sex with a 5-year old boy.
* Republican petition drive manager Tom Randall pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 14, one of them the daughter of an associate in the petition business.
* Republican County Chairman Armando Tebano pleaded guilty to fondling a 14-year-old girl.
* Republican teacher and former city councilman John Collins pleaded guilty to sexually molesting 13 and 14 year old girls.
* Republican campaign worker Mark Seidensticker is a convicted child molester.
* Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.
* Republican Mayor Tom Adams was arrested for distributing child pornography over the internet.
* Republican Mayor John Gosek was arrested on charges of soliciting sex from two 15-year old girls.
* Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.
* Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.
* Republican Committeeman John R. Curtin was convicted of molesting an underage teenage boy and sentenced to serve six to 18 months in prison.
* Republican anti-abortion activist Howard Scott Heldreth is a convicted child rapist in Florida.
* Republican zoning supervisor, Boy Scout leader and Lutheran church president Dennis L. Rader pleaded guilty to performing a sexual act on an 11-year old girl he murdered.
* Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.
* Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.
* Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.
* Republican pastor Mike Hintz, whom George W. Bush commended during the 2004 presidential campaign, surrendered to police after admitting to a sexual affair with a female juvenile.
* Republican legislator Peter Dibble pleaded no contest to having an inappropriate relationship with a 13-year-old girl.
* Republican advertising consultant Carey Lee Cramer was sentenced to six years in prison for molesting two 8-year old girls, one of whom appeared in an anti-Gore television commercial.
* Republican fundraiser Lawrence E. King, Jr. organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
* Republican lobbyist Craig J. Spence organized child sex parties at the White House during the 1980s.
* Republican Congressman Donald “Buz” Lukens was found guilty of having sex with a female minor and sentenced to one month in jail.
* Republican fundraiser Richard A. Delgaudio was found guilty of child porn charges and paying two teenage girls to pose for sexual photos.
* Republican activist Mark A. Grethen convicted on six counts of sex crimes involving children.
* Republican campaign chairman Randal David Ankeney pleaded guilty to attempted sexual assault on a child and was arrested again five years later on the same charge.
* Republican Congressman Dan Crane had sex with a female minor working as a congressional page.
* Republican activist and Christian Coalition leader Beverly Russell admitted to an incestuous relationship with his step daughter.
* Republican Judge Ronald C. Kline pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer.
* Republican congressman and anti-gay activist Robert Bauman was charged with having sex with a 16-year-old boy he picked up at a gay bar.
* Republican Committee Chairman Jeffrey Patti was arrested for distributing a video clip of a 5-year-old girl being raped.
* Republican activist Marty Glickman (a.k.a. “Republican Marty”), was taken into custody by Florida police on four counts of unlawful sexual activity with an underage girl and one count of delivering the drug LSD.
* Republican legislative aide Howard L. Brooks was charged with molesting a 12-year old boy and possession of child pornography.
* Republican Senate candidate John Hathaway was accused of having sex with his 12-year old baby sitter and withdrew his candidacy after the allegations were reported in the media.
* Republican preacher Stephen White, who demanded a return to traditional values, was sentenced prison after offering $20 to a 14-year-old boy for permission to perform oral sex on him.
* Republican talk show host Jon Matthews pleaded guilty to exposing his genitals to an 11 year old girl.
* Republican anti-gay activist Earl “Butch” Kimmerling was sentenced to 40 years in prison for molesting an 8-year old girl after he attempted to stop a gay couple from adopting her.
* Republican Party leader Paul Ingram pleaded guilty to six counts of raping his daughters and served 14 years in federal prison.
* Republican election board official Kevin Coan was sentenced to two years probation for soliciting sex over the internet from a 14-year old girl.
* Republican politician Andrew Buhr was charged with two counts of first degree sodomy with a 13-year old boy.
* Republican legislator Keith Westmoreland was arrested on seven felony counts of lewd and lascivious exhibition to girls under the age of 16 (i.e. exposing himself to children).
* Republican anti-abortion activist John Allen Burt was found guilty of molesting a 15-year old girl.
* Republican County Councilman Keola Childs pleaded guilty to molesting a male child.
* Republican activist John Butler was charged with criminal sexual assault on a teenage girl.
* Republican candidate Richard Gardner admitted to molesting his two daughters.
* Republican Councilman and former Marine Jack W. Gardner was convicted of molesting a 13-year old girl.
* Republican County Commissioner Merrill Robert Barter pleaded guilty to unlawful sexual contact and assault on a teenage boy.
* Republican City Councilman Fred C. Smeltzer, Jr. pleaded no contest to raping a 15 year-old girl and served 6-months in prison.
* Republican activist Parker J. Bena pleaded guilty to possession of child pornography on his home computer and was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and fined $18,000.
* Republican parole board officer and former Colorado state representative, Larry Jack Schwarz, was fired after child pornography was found in his possession.
* Republican strategist and Citadel Military College graduate Robin Vanderwall was convicted in Virginia on five counts of soliciting sex from boys and girls over the internet.
* Republican city councilman Mark Harris, who is described as a “good military man” and “church goer,” was convicted of repeatedly having sex with an 11-year-old girl and sentenced to 12 years in prison.
* Republican businessman Jon Grunseth withdrew his candidacy for Minnesota governor after allegations surfaced that he went swimming in the nude with four underage girls, including his daughter.
* Republican campaign worker, police officer and self-proclaimed reverend Steve Aiken was convicted of having sex with two underage girls.
* Republican director of the “Young Republican Federation” Nicholas Elizondo molested his 6-year old daughter and was sentenced to six years in prison.
* Republican president of the New York City Housing Development Corp. Russell Harding pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer.
* Republican benefactor of conservative Christian groups, Richard A. Dasen Sr., was found guilty of raping a 15-year old girl. Dasen, 62, who is married with grown children and several grandchildren, has allegedly told police that over the past decade he paid more than $1 million to have sex with a large number of young women.
* Republican Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld authorized the rape of children in Iraqi prisons in order to humiliate their parents into providing information about the anti-American insurgency. See excerpt of one prisoner’s report here and his full report here.
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
America needs to know these facts about Palin.
• In a videotaped speech to students at her church this year she claimed that the war in Iraq is God’s will.
• In the same speech she also claimed that it is God’s will that Alaska build a $30 million gas and oil pipeline.
• As governor, she advocates teaching creationism in public school classrooms.
• A bipartisan committee is investigating Palin who fired public safety commissioner Walt Monegan because he would not dismiss a trooper, Mike Wooten, who went through a messy divorce with her sister before Palin’s election as governor. The evidence is poring out suggesting abuse of power.
• Also refuting overwhelming scientific evidence, Plain states that global warming is not due to human activity.
• She opposes abortion even in the case of rape or incest.
• As mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, she secured almost $27 million in earmarks for her hamlet of about 6,400, assisted by a lobbyist closely allied to now-tarnished Sen. Ted Stevens. Now she says that she is opposed to earmark funding.
• Palin, who has zero experience in foreign policy and only last year received her first U.S. passport , told Alaska Business Monthly that ‘I’ve been so focused on state government, I haven’t really focused much on the war in Iraq.”
• She is under investigation as to whether she abused her power as governor by dismissing the state’s public safety commissioner for refusing to fire her former brother-in-law from the state police.
• She opposes Sex Education in schools and has a 17 year old daughter who and is now pregnant and unwed.
Palin has close ties to the extreme fringe Alaska Independence Party, which has at times sought a vote on whether the state should secede.
• As mayor, she pressured her town librarian to ban books.
• Palin is a NRA member and opposes any bans on assault weapons
(Do you need an assault weapon to kill a moose?)
• Palin flip-flopped on her support for the “Bridge to Nowhere.”
• Bush speechwriter Matthew Scully wrote Palin’s speech… How is this Change?
Whats the Difference between Bush and Palin?…. Lipstick
Clearly she is prepared to continue the Bush legacy of hypocrisy, ignorance of science, cronyism, and promoting the agenda of the extreme religious right. Palin can count herself among the members of the “Flat Earth Society.”
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
indy_voter-
a jackass ? guess i am to some. do i care ?? NO ! i won’t deny i have a very hard code of ethics. there are cores of behavior good men and women should follow. too bad more 28 year olds don’t have such strong ethics and knowledge of right and wrong . let’s be honest . you were not trying to be decent. and why can’t you answer my grammar question ? anyway, that’s beside the point. what difference would it make to you if my husband returns home safe or not ? all his death would be to you is another notch against republicans and president bush. i pray to god every day he comes home to his daughter and me safe. anyway, where is your correction of your grammar ????
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I disagree.
Her “qualifier” was that she has a uterus.
Posted by: Julianne | September 11, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
god particle-
here’s one ! SHOVE IT UP YOUR ASS !!!!!!!!!
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
I,m calling for Ms. Fowler to reasign as chair of the DNC for S.C.effective immeadiatly. This woman has no place in the national debate. Period.
Posted by: JB | Sep 10, 2008 9:49:44 PM
—
Hey JB – are you going to slam McCain too? He called his wife a cun*. That’s more offensive and very telling of his character, or lack thereof.
Posted by: Jordy | September 11, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Saturday in Colorado Springs, Colo., Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said, “The fact is that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers. The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help.”
“Too expensive to the taxpayers?”
They’re private entities.
Palin knows NADA!!
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
THESE ARE VERIFIED QUOTES FROM GOVERNOR SARAH PALIN OVER THE PAST 20+ YEARS (verified from reliable sources and newspapers): “I don’t believe in interracial relationships, I was born in Idaho and raised to believe that whites and blacks shouldn’t mix or date each other” (1986) “I want creationism as the only theory taught in our schools” (2001) “I don’t know a lot about Iran, I just heard that they are bad people” (2006) “He can say he is a christian but as far as I’m concerned, Obama is a muslim, look at his middle name” (2007) “The bible will at some point, be in every classroom in our great state if I have my way” (2005) “Here in Alaska, we don’t have hardly any black people, I never talk to them, so I was surprised that a black girl beat me in the 1984 Miss Alaska pageant”(1988) “Todd and I talked about Hurricane Katrina as God’s way of cleansing New Orleans of the blacks who have sinned, the Bible predicted it” (2005)
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I always remember vividly that Bill Clinton pointed a finger to the world and said: “Read my lips, I do not have sexual relationship with that woman Monica Lewinsky”!!! Bill is the king of the sexual scandal, I think the Congress should legistale to stop this cr*p being exposed in the public to save America’s face.
Posted by: Mike | September 11, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
McSame used the same Lipstick on Pig remark referring to Clinton a few years back.
McSame used the same Lipstick on Pig remark referring to Hillary a few years back.
McSame/Caribou Barbie taking taking Hypocrisy to an all new level
Taking Hypocracy to an all new level
Posted by: God Particle | September 11, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
“1. if you do not want to get pregnant use birth control. or are you liberals too stupid ? could it be that since there is a time limit on welfare that’s why we see more abortions now. by the way you can blame clinton for that. not the little money makers they used to be huh !!”
Ummm, if you right wing extremist taught your children that birth control not only prevents pregnancies but also STDs, you republican hicks wouldn’t have the highest teen pregnancy rate in red states.
•••
Ummm, if left wing extremists like some here knew more, understood more, and were willing to refrain from misrepresenting facts, they would tell the truth that many sexually-transmitted diseases cannot be prevented by many forms of birth control, and that only 100% abstinence is 100% effective. In addition, they would know that referring to someone as a “hick” is the same sort of behavior as referring to someone by any other bigoted and derogatory term, whether it relates to a person’s age, the part of the country they inhabit, their race, religion, national origin, sex, color or whatever. They would also know that millions of Republicans, and, for that matter, millions of Democrats and Independents, too, cannot be pigeonholed the way ignorant, stupid and dishonest people all too often try to do. Last, teen pregnancy rates are not kept on such bases as “republican hicks.” Such records are kept by race, however. Perhaps BrooklynGril was inarticulate on that subject.
•••
•••
“2. if you do get pregnant look to adoption instead of killing an innocent child. but then again god forbid you have to stay off booze and weed for nine months.”
And since you and your party is so against abortion, name one program that Republicans have created in the last 8 years to PREVENT unwanted pregnancies. Oh you can’t? Can you name one program the Republicans have drafted to make adoptions easier? Oh…you can’t do that either?
•••
One more time: only 100% abstinence is 100% effective in preventing pregnancy. Republicans tend to favor abstinence education programs, although that is not universal, just as although there are many pro-choice Republicans, just as there are many pro-life Democrats, most Republicans are pro-life and most Democrats, pro-choice. Republicans have certainly supported abstinence education in Congressional lawmaking. Sexually transmitted diseases can be passed via direct blood-to-blood contact in some cases, such as HIV, so even 100% abstinence cannot protect one from all forms of transmission of all STDs. If you would like to learn more about abstinence, read up. I confess to grave doubts that BrooklynGril has any interest in reading up on anything that might conflict with her previously-held opinions.
*
Let us deal with some real-world truths. John and Cindy McCain adopted a special-needs child from India. Cindy McCain has spent a huge amount of time and an enormous amount of money during her life, helping provide medical services to people in Third World countries. That is how she came across the young girl the McCains adopted. Todd and Sarah Palin chose life for their unborn child who, they had learned through amniocentesis, would be a Down’s syndrome, special-needs child. Their daughter, Bristol, chose life for her unborn child, too. These are people who not only talk the talk, but walk the walk. That extends to their sons’ service in Iraq, as well, for both the Palins and the McCains.
*
Senator Barack Obama, I read the other day, has now claimed (for apparently the first time in his life according to a search of the texts of his own two memoirs and on public databases) that he once thought about going into the military and serving his country. According to him, this was when he graduated from high school and was required to register with the Selective Service system. ( http://tinyurl.com/5b25ax ). I wonder, was that as opposed to serving only the needs of the racial group to which he happens to belong as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago? Did he decide not to enlist because he realized he might test positive for the use of cocaine? I would like to know why, exactly, he refused to serve his country, when this country has given him so much. Mr. Obama said it was “… not an option that I ever decided to pursue.”
*
How noble is Barack Obama. How brave. What a patriot! That is, until one compares the choices he has made in his life to the choices and personal sacrifices of Senator McCain, his forebears, his sons, the Palin’s son, and the sacrifices of all those who have ever served this country in the uniforms of our military, and of their families. After all, it is the families who have often borne the heaviest burdens.
•••
•••
“3. if you don’t want a baby and can’t figure out how to use birth control or can’t afford it, CROSS YOUR LEGS. for the morons that’s where one leg rests over top of the other. if you can’t figure it out ask for help.”
Well birth control could be as easy to obtain as let’s say…ummm viagra! Oh that’s right, McCain thinks that making love trumps a women’s ability to protect herself.
“she needs to come equiped with a mute button. what a pathetic piece of low class trash.”
And can you believe that McCain choose that pathetic piece of low class trash as his running mate? Oh goodie, Palin’s other teen daughter can de-flower right there in the WH.
•••
Left wing extremists, like some here, want taxpayer-paid birth control available even to children of middle school age and younger, without parental notification. None of those kids has a need for Viagra: that’s both a straw man and an apples-and-oranges argument that BrooklynGril tries to foist upon us. Yet, she trumps herself, speaking of “a women’s ability to protect herself” [sic]. They aren’t men or women at that age. They are not capable of forming mature judgments based on a full knowledge and understanding of the relevant facts and consequences. We should not abet immorality and poor life choices through the aegis of the State, least of all when it comes to children.
*
Beyond that, the State should not force, for reasons of avoiding a clear and direct conflict with the dictates of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of religion, by collecting taxes for that purpose, those who find it anathema to pay for abortions and birth control, for example. Personally, I have no problem with allowing abortions for the sake of the life of the mother, and in cases of rape and incest, nor do I have any problem with adults having the choice to purchase birth control for themselves — so long as they are adults. Speaking of Constitutional freedoms, though, it sure is nice to hear a presumably urban person like BrooklynGril express her deep, abiding support for the Second Amendment. Surely, the right to keep and bear arms is an essential part of “a women’s ability to protect herself” [sic]! Nice to know that BrooklynGril has that in common with the next Vice President of the United States, NRA Life Member Sarah Palin.
*
BrooklynGril clearly has some serious anger issues that make her a bad risk for obtaining or having a concealed carry permit. She said, “… can you believe that McCain choose that pathetic piece of low class trash as his running mate? Oh goodie, Palin’s other teen daughter can de-flower right there in the WH.” A sound like BrooklynGril is on a course to make or embody a threat to a protected individual. Perhaps she should let the Secret Service know who and where she is, to prevent herself from doing someone — perhaps even herself, tragically — some grievous harm.
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 11, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
What about all the terrible things McCain himself says about women? What he calls them, Hillary and her daughter? laughing when someone calls Hillary a B*&*H! Not supporting contraception support via education or health insurance benefits but supports viagra prescriptions?
Staffer that’s complaining… McCain isn’t a saint, and he’s done far worse than Obama or any of this staff, paid, unpaid or party members.
Posted by: chris | September 11, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Why does the poster known as ‘God Particle’ post so many things we have already seen independently established to have been nothing more than scurrilous rumors, the sort of thing spread by people of no apparent morality, education, or intellect?
*
I will not dignify such specious and malicious garbage any further than to provide a small sample of the material available at the following link. You may be sure you will find, if you look, that ‘God Particle’s’ “facts” simply aren’t what they purport to be.
*
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/sliming_palin.html
• Palin did not cut funding for special needs education in Alaska by 62 percent. She didn’t cut it at all. In fact, she tripled per-pupil funding over just three years.
• She did not demand that books be banned from the Wasilla library. Some of the books on a widely circulated list were not even in print at the time. The librarian has said Palin asked a “What if?” question, but the librarian continued in her job through most of Palin’s first term.
• She was never a member of the Alaskan Independence Party, a group that wants Alaskans to vote on whether they wish to secede from the United States. She’s been registered as a Republican since May 1982.
• Palin never endorsed or supported Pat Buchanan for president. She once wore a Buchanan button as a “courtesty” when he visited Wasilla, but shortly afterward she was appointed to co-chair of the campaign of Steve Forbes in the state.
• Palin has not pushed for teaching creationism in Alaska’s schools. She has said that students should be allowed to “debate both sides” of the evolution question, but she also said creationism “doesn’t have to be part of the curriculum.”
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 11, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Hey Tracy,
Here are a few select “TRACISMS” for your reconsideration.
Maybe these would be better called “TRACIST REMARKS”.
They are all taken directly from your own posts on this blog.
Take a look in the mirror, and then read the following quotes aloud:
*I guess with all of the idiocy being spewed forth…
*guess what, you are an IDIOT…
*hate to tell you, but the idiocy you are spewing …
*Grow up and learn something. Find a cure for your case of cranio-rectal inversion.
*this woman is an example of the phrase ” typical white trash fashion”
*she needs to come equiped (sic) with a mute button. what a pathetic piece of low class trash.
*here’s some advice. get the hell out of here.
*looks like you’re spelling skills are about as good as your comeback. [See own spelling errors]
*maybe one day you’ll be as articulate as a fifth grader
The following are direct quotes form a variety of your numerous, empty posts on this blog.
I note: you offer no facts & no real opinions in any of your postings.
You limit yourself to heaping abuse on other bloggers.
You sound a little like your Republican Joan of Arc, Gov. Sarah Palin.
Her speeches are likewise curiously empty of content, full of lies, and basically a string of insults and vituperations against the opposing party.
================================================================
You do seem to pride yourself on your self-proclaimed mastery of English grammar. You should not.
For example, you repond to one poster:
why not point them out if you can ? [in reference to your presumed grammatical errors]
O.K., I shall.
1. You never capitalize the first word at the start of a new sentence. This just looks lazy. I’m sure you know better, but somehow can’t be bothered.
2. You correct BrooklynGirl’s grammar by suggesting that she made a grammatical mistake. She did, but then so did you in your correction.
You write:
“you and your party is” it should have been “your and your party are”. in correct english “you are ” is proper .
You, Tracy, are correcting one mistake, only to turn around and make a new one.
“YOUR and your party are”, is not correct, “YOU and your party are…” is.:0
3. You write “i just know how to properly speak the language.”
This is very bad grammar, though it is a common mistake….”to properly speak the language”…is a split infinitive, i.e. you’ve inserted the adverb “properly” between “to” and the verb “speak”.
Split infinitives are NEVER permitted according to basic rules of correct English grammar.
To re-write the sentence correctly, you should have written “I just know how to speak the language properly.”
Your writing is replete with numerous similar elementary mistakes in spelling, punctuation, and grammar, so many, that frankly no one would have the time to correct them all.
I am surprised you have the gall to correct others.
What was it the good Lord had to say about people like you? Oh yeah.
Matthew 7:5 “You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.
Posted by: niccolo m@cchiavelli | September 11, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
==============================
Tracy, don’t let niccolio scare you, he escaped from his treehouse. Soon his mommy will take his computer away from him and he will have to go to bed without supper.
His lies he spews at that great woman, Sarah Palin, is eating away at his alcohol rotted liver. They cannot stand it that McCain, the Great American, who was serving his country while Obammy was doing crack, is ahead in polls and gaining. They cannot stand that a woman, a GREAT Woman, who has family and home town values, will be in the white house before Hitlery.
They need help, lots and lots of help.
Palin – 08
Posted by: LarryMan | September 11, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Hey Larry Boy!
McCain is ahead in polls and gaining….”
========================================
Gaining on what? Is McCain chasing his own tail?
Woof! Woof!
Posted by: niccolo m@cchiavelli | September 11, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
niccolo-
so glad you were able to see a few of my purposeful errors. can you find the others? let me know if you do. it’s like a thousand piece jigsaw puzzle.. go for it.. time is a wastin’. that should be an easy one for you. sent you a freebie. being a liberal you should like that..
Posted by: TRACY | September 11, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
LarryMan-
thanks.. but how could i let a moron like that scare me. i certainly am above that.. liberal pudd pulling left wing wackos…
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
niccolo-
curious………..yes i already know that’s a lot of periods. why may i ask has brooklyngril not responded ? also, do you personally advocate killing unborn babies ? and if so why ? and if you can not give me a reason other than incest or rape where i do believe in the right of abortion i’d like to hear your reasoning
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
niccolo-
curious………..yes i already know that’s a lot of periods. why may i ask has brooklyngril not responded ? also, do you personally advocate killing unborn babies ? and if so why ? and if you can not give me a reason other than incest or rape where i do believe in the right of abortion i’d like to hear your reasoning
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
My errors are deliberate errors, not purposeful, since that would be to attribute volition to errors. I am so glad you appreciated may correcting a few of your many inadvertent errors. No doubt they’re the result of haste, and not from lack of education, or out of sheer laziness. Can you find my corrections of your atrocious grammar in this text? It’s like a thousand-piece puzzle.
You presume to know my likes and dislikes? Call me a skeptic, but I doubt you even know what the word “liberal” means, let alone how liberalism differs from Conservatives, what is “neo” about the neo-liberals, what “neo’ about neo-liberals, how European liberalism differs from American, the origins of the Republican party, the Democratic party, the basic belief system animating Republicanism, the reasons why party divisions first sprung up in American politics.
You know what? I KNOW you don’t know why you like Sarah Palin. How do I know? Because, as yet, no one knows where she really stands on any of the key positions of the day, and none of her supporters have bothered to look back at her actual record. If they had, they’d realize she is NOT the politician they have been making her out to be.
The ancient Greeks had a word for someone who formed strong political opinions, but who was completely uninformed.
They called such people IDIOTS.
That makes you one, too.
You think you know my preferences?
Whom did I vote for in the 2000 primaries, and again in the primaries of 2008?
I’ll give you a clue, he ran for President both times.
Posted by: niccolo m@cchiavelli | September 11, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Tracy,
I do not “advocate” killing unborn babies.
Nor does anyone else EVER “advocate killing babies, born or unborn”.
Based on the language and grammar evidenced in your posts; the bile, spit and rancor animating your attacks on other posters; the lack of any facts, information, or reasoned opinion, I’ve concluded you are an I_____T, as the ancient Greeks would have thought: You have strong, set political opinions, but can neither argue them with reason, nor provide evidence to back them up.
Please continue your conversation with LarryMan, he is indeed an interlocutor & discussant more your equal…
but count me out.
Ciao.
Posted by: niccolo m@cchiavelli | September 11, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
niccolo,
now now. don’t get so upset . it must suck to be that unhappy. make some friends….. of course you’ll say you have some. never mind…………. wow it is a good thing my husband is not here.. he’d have you for lunch and spit you out again for a snack
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
if i am so beneath you why do you keep responding ? and correct me if i am wrong………….. periods again. don’t democrats think it’s ok to have late term abortions???????????that is killing babies right…………..
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Another teen-age bride supporting the Palin’s. Somehow, I’m not surprised.
So, you must be from Alabama – you’d have to be, marrying so young. What is the age of consent again in Alabama. Was it 14?
You sound like your very close to your husband. How nice.
Like brother & sister, huh?
Just wondering…you were so curious to hear my views on incest.
Posted by: niccolo m@cchiavelli | September 11, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
niccolo-
wow !!!!!!!! what makes you think i married young.. i am 28 and have a two year old…… i got married at 25.. and as for alabama. it is a beautiful state that i traveled to once. meeting people there i would be proud to say that i was from there . it is a work of art that morons like you can not relate to because of it’s unique beauty. that is all i can say. get a few things right.
1. i was raised in oak park outside of chicago.
2. my husband was born in san antiono …
3. how the hell could we be related ?
seriously, you have to be the dumbest bitch alive.. like i wrote earlier. MAKE SOME FRIENDS…even if you have to pay them.. i have more than enough money if you need some. just to get you a life………….
Posted by: tracy | September 11, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
If all these people are so pumped on abortion, why don’t they just abort themselves. Or isn’t it as much fun as murdering someone else’s living being — notice I didn’t say baby so I would not offend all those legitamate baby killers.
Posted by: freethought4u | September 11, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
If all these people are so pumped on abortion, why don’t they just abort themselves. Or isn’t it as much fun as murdering someone else’s living being — notice I didn’t say baby so I would not offend all those legitamate baby killers.
Posted by: freethought4u | September 11, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
This is just vile! The decision to have or not to have an abortion is an intensely private and painful decision. For the Dems to make such a vile statement, they paint themselves a party of unethical and demonize those who choose to have babies!
Posted by: vote4thebest | September 11, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
╔╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╗
╠◀ABORT 3RD TERM OF DARK SIDE▶╣
╚╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╝
Posted by: Roe & Wade | September 11, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
╔╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╦╗
╠ ◀ABORT 3RD TERM FOR THE DARK SIDE▶ ╣
╚╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╩╝
Posted by: Roe & Wade | September 11, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Hey Tracy -
“You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.”
Matthew 7:5
:-)
Posted by: the dumbest b*tch alive | September 11, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
dumbest b*tch alive-
how is tracy a hypocrite ? i cant figure that out. anyway, i wrote you a song:
“GIVE IT TO ME FOR NOTHIN’ AND I WANT IT RIGHT NOW.
FREE’S MY FAVORITE WORD AND I’LL SHOUT IT OUT LOUD.
A GOVERNMENT CHECK IS THE BEST WAY TO GO.
FOODSTAMPS AND FREEBIES ARE ALL THAT I KNOW.
I WANT IT FOR NOTHIN’ AND I WANT IT FOR FREE.
KEEP PAYIN’ YOUR TAXES AND SUPPORTIN’ ME.
I WON’T DO AN HONEST DAYS WORTH OF WORK.
OH NO !!
WELFARE IS THE WAY DON’T YOU SEE THAT YOU JERK !”
Posted by: Aaron | September 12, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
aaron-
free, free, free. handouts. you’re right. that’s all liberals know. liked the song. it’s kinda catchy. oh yeah. how is tracy a hypocrite? couldn’t figure that out either. pretty witty isn’t she ?
Posted by: lisa | September 12, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Hey, Look ,where Biden`s speech??? Wow,Sarah Palin show up at speech more than Biden. Tell Brack Obama ” Dry up”
I don`t like Obama`s face ( sneer) looks alike he knows eveythings but not true. I am sick of Obama`s whiner , Why not , Ask Obama about Rezko??
Vote McCain and Sarh for president.
Bill , Please don`t help Obama, he knows you are dog.
Let vote McCain!!!!!
Posted by: Buck | September 12, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Bill Clinton, Remembered Michelle Obama and Obama`s campgain brought up about ” racist ” against Bill two times and hurt Hillary`s vote . That called they are cheater and steal Hillary`s vote.
Tell Obama Go Hell!!!
Posted by: Buck | September 12, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Palin is female and has a family. She shows what she can do and has done. Now if Dem’s need a woman why not find one who has had an abortion and let everyone see the gooy mess she left in the abortionist little blood soaked jar. Now let us decide which one is a better VP candidate. One with children or one without children and a “chum bucket” for a sence of responsibility? Come on Dems, get off the sexism and back to issues! You knnow if a VP candidate treated her own children bad no one would vote for her. That’s why you chose a man.
Posted by: BruceC | September 12, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
The response to Ms Fowler is this:
Sarah Palin has run a state and and a
municipality as a governor and mayor!
You’re Presidential Candidate,
Barack Obama, according to none other than Hillary Clinton, “has a speech he
gave in 2002″! Nuff Said!
The McCain/Palin Landslide has begun!
Posted by: reaganfan | September 12, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Hey, brooklyngirl, is that what we can look forward to? Obama’s foulmouthed ignorant, rabied dogs and bitches? Keep on, you are really helping Obama bigtime!
Posted by: illinoisgirl | September 14, 2008, 6:20 am 6:20 am
Wow, wow! I did not know that if you are from a small town, you are labeled as ignorant and educated.
Eric, are you impressed with Obama because of his Harvard education? Poor you! When I was doing my graduate work at the University of Hawaii, one of my Professors (tenured professors, unlike Obama who exaggerates his very limited credentials and when he lied (again) week, “I was not only a community developer, I was also a Professor at the University of Chicago for 12 years.”)had one advice for me: never let schooling interfere with your education. In the last 12 years, our presidents have been Yale graduates that is why Harvard is supporting Obama by blocking any attempts to gain access to his thesis and other related writings.
Tracy don’t worry about Niccolo Machiavelli. He is dead. He died in 1527. He was an Italiam political thinker who advocated that “theological and moral imperatives have no place in the political arena. He also believed that one can only be good as long as eing good does not interfere with your goals. The adjective, “machiavellian,” suggests policies od conduct marked by cunning, duplicity, and bad faith.
I would like to recommend Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father”, to all the learned ones. Warning: if your vocabulary is limited to four-letter words and profanities, this book is not for you.
In this book, Obama writes: “…the hostile stares, the whispers, would have driven a woman in my mother’s predicament into a back alley abortion…” Yet, Ann Dunham was strong. She chose to give birth to Barack. However, Barack chose not to celebrate his mother with a book. He, instead, chose to write a book to honor his father, a polygamist who left him when he was two years old.
He wrote that book as a backdrop for his metamosphosis from White Barry to
Black Barack, the future president.
Don’t you think I should really be supporting him since he is our Senator? I know him too well, I think. So, for the first time in my life, I am voting for a Republican.
Country first!
Oh, by the way, Did you hear him say he is going to reduce taxes? Well, Cook county (includes Chicago) made it to the top as having the highest sales tax in the country at 10.25% So, open your ears and your minds, listen to his promises and make sure they are doable!
Good luck, y’all!
Posted by: illinoisgirl | September 14, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
I keep making the mistake of trying to make sense of what the liberals say, when I already know it’s impossible, because they don’t make any sense.
They are terrified of Palin because, in their eyes, she doesn’t have any experience. Yet they ignore that Obama has a lot less experience than her, while ignoring Palin’s accomplishments.
That is typical of liberals. To use an argument against a candidate that is the same argument against their own candidate, even more so.
The difference is that the argument against Palin not having executive experience is a lie, and the same argument against Obama is true.
Palin has had a lot of executive experience and has had to make decisions and be responsible for them, which Obama hasn’t.
I have a friend in Alaska who is upset they might lose her as Governor.
He said she took on a corrupt government there and successfully turned it around.
The people in Alaska love her because of what she has done to make that state a better place to live and work. She has an 80% approval rating, the highest in the nation.
Could a liberal please name even one good thing Obama has accomplished during his short and unremarkable poltical career?
I am terrified of Obama, and for good reasons, as I will explain.
Obama will be a disaster for sure. Not just if someone dies and he is defaulted to be the leader.
At least, you who are afraid of Palin, have a buffer in McCain.
Obama was raised a muslim and grew up idolizing Malcolm X.
I know liberals love to deny this, but there is proof of records showing him enrolled and attending muslim schools as a muslim.
In his autobiography he observes that, like Malcolm X, he wishes he could get rid of the white blood in him. So, he is definately a racist and hates the whiteness in himself.
Can’t get much more hatred than wanting to purge ones blood to cut ties to a race of which one was born to, even theoretically speaking.
He has ties to terrorists and an America, white people hating, so called minister. Of which I seriously doubt that minister has much if any contact with God.
His foreign experience is so non- existent, that he went to Europe and proposed doing away with a treaty that was done away with 20 years ago. Whoops!!!
The terrorists are rooting for him and support him for president. They think he will finally pull the U.S. out of Iraq, as they have been wanting this for a long time.
Then they say that when the US pulls out they can take over Iraq and then concentrate on putting together and launching terrorist attacks on Israel and the US.
Apparently our attack on Iraq has kept them too busy, and resources spread out, to be able to do that so far.
The large majority of muslims view Obama as muslim, since in their religion, being born to a muslim father makes you muslim.
They feel that having him as president will put them that much closer to their goal of imposing islamic law over the whole world.
Once America, their biggest obstical to that goal, is under islamic control, the rest of the world will quickly follow. At least in their dream of dreams, and I think they are right about that.
I don’t know if Obama will actively help them in that goal, but I seriously doubt he would do anything to stop them. Which is the way Europe is going right now.
The liberals love it when Obama says he is for change. They are so much into worshiping him that they don’t even care about what that change is and they don’t even ask him about that.
He wants to tax Americans to the point where there will be no more middle class. Then there will just be the elites(like him) and the have-nots, who will be totally dependent on the government for everything.
He wants to redistribute the wealth, by giving the UN the power to tax us for billions for World Poverty. That’s above and beyond the billions America already sends.
Plus, the billions we already send have made things worse, not better.
The evil, murdering leaders take the money and use it to finance the killing of their own people for being Christain. Along with making them wealthy and powerful.
No amount of money we send to the undeveloped countries will help untill the cause of the poverty is eliminated, and they get a government that is at least somewhat for the people.
But, since most of those immoral, unethcial, criminal leaders are high up in the UN and run the ethics commitee, we can’t get rid of them.
Especially since they were caught red handed with their paws in the Oil for Food cookie jar, and none of them were accused or punished for it.
Obama is the author of a bill to give these same criminals more billions of our taxes to steal, corrupt and waste.
I guess it takes a whole lot of money to maintain a murdering, dictator life style. And since they lost their mad money from the Oil for Food, they have to beg the world for more.
So basically the wonderful changes he wants is to do away with is democracy, at least for the peons, and turn the US into a Socialist/Communist country.
He wants us to be under the rule of the evil corrupt UN and the world court, so they can make us lose the war on terror and not have the power or ability to protect our freedom. Or to be able to free other countries. Like we were niave enough to waste precious American lives in WWII, so they could turn around and hate us and let muslims defecate on our hero’s graves.
Then I think, maybe having Obama as president will help to open the eyes of liberals when he messes up so bad even they can’t ignore it.
Then I remember that he is so adept at avoiding responsibility for anything, that he will just blame his mistakes on the conservatives, and liberals will blindly believe that.
I just pray that, God forbid, if Obama becomes president, that he won’t be able to do so much damage in 4 years, that it can’t be repaired.
Posted by: Tasha | September 14, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Ron.
Really, you can’t find one qualification? Maybe, you should clean your else. Or maybe you need a lobotomy. I’ii give you one: she is an American-born citize of the United States. She has held many years of elective office.
How much do you know abouth Obama? You only know what he wants you to know about him. He is a mystery man, a legend. His followers say he is the fulfillment of an American Dream. Why, is the American Dream only reserved to African Americans?
I have not seen any candidate more scrutinized than Palin. No, I don’t think it is because she is a woman, It is because she has a longer resume and experience. Obama needed Oprah to introduced him. And for those who are celebrity-struck, that was enough. Oprah’s endoresement was enough. When Ted Kennedy endorsed him everybody cheered! I know Ted has done a lot for this country. Nobody even made reference to the Chappaquiddick incident. For heaven’s sakes! A woman was killed! Yet, the liberals and the media had the time to dig up on Palin, and even came up with Todd’s DUI many, many years ago. Did anybody go to Hawaii to dig up on Obama? No! And I don’t think they would find anything, either. He has not done anything newsworthy.
Posted by: ilinoisgirl | September 15, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
annarbormike —
You wrote:
•••
This article could use a wording tune up to make it a
little more balanced. Especially in the headline. It
suggests Palin was entirely wrong, and then talks about
how she was only wrong with regard to the past 30
years? Slanted.
•••
Agreed, as far as you go.
You wrote:
•••
@ habee4380 (and majorundertaking, somewhat)
I think you’re wrong about that.
•••
Please define what you mean by, “that” in this context, annarbormike.
You wrote:
•••
Charlie Gibson got it about as correct as anyone could.
The idea of “multiple Bush Doctrines” is still being
contended in academic circles because of the many
apparent shifts in Bush’s strategy and the disagreement
about how to partition his overall strategy. Some foreign
policy experts still refer to a singular doctrine.
•••
Some may “still refer to a singular doctrine,” but that does not mean Gibson’s original question to Governor Palin on the subject was not the cause of absolutely legitimate confusion. He could have and should have known and understood the extant confusion and academic disagreement over the very nature and extent of what has been referred to by many as the “Bush Doctrine.”. He should have clarified to which understanding of the nature and extent of the Bush Doctrine he was referring. That he did not is indicative of his ignorance, or of a knowing attempt on his part to take advantage of that very confusion in an attempt to pose a “gotcha” question. If the latter is the case, that is journalistic malpractice and betrays blatant bias. However, my third and most severe criticism of Charlie Gibson in that series of questions is that he was observably arrogant and condescending as he told her what (in his own opinion) the Bush Doctrine is, as if it were the only interpretation, when clearly, many interpretations exist. In other words, Charlie Gibson told Sarah Palin and the entire audience something that very evidently is not true, and he did so in an impolite and thoroughly unprofessional manner, adding insult to injury. Is it any wonder so many who have seen this sort of thing over and over again from the MSM perceive bias, generally?
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
annarbormike —
Read the material to which I linked in a previous post:
http://tinyurl.com/65kf — a PDF, “The National Security Strategy of the United States of America”
http://tinyurl.com/ftcb2 — the Wikipedia article on the Bush Doctrine
http://tinyurl.com/3pbtch — article, Bill Sammon, “Palin’s Definition of ‘Bush Doctrine’ Hits the Gibson Mark”
http://tinyurl.com/27dtn9 — article, Jeff Jacoby, “Death of the Bush Doctrine“
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
annarbormike —
If you will further follow the links in the Wikipedia article to the sources for the following passage, you will find more scholarship to the effect that definition of the Bush Doctrine is not one, sole, agreed-upon thing.
It may be viewed as a set of several related foreign
policy principles, including stress on ending terrorism,
spreading democracy,[1] increased unilateralism in
foreign policy[1] and an expanded view of American
national security interests. Foreign policy experts
argue over the meaning of the term “Bush Doctrine,”
and some scholars have suggested that there is no
one unified theory underlying Bush’s foreign policy.
Jacob Weisberg identifies six successive “Bush Doctrines”
in his book The Bush Tragedy,[2] while former Bush
staffer Peter D. Feaver has counted seven.[3] Other
foreign policy experts have taken the term to mean
Bush’s doctrine of preventive war, first articulated in
2002, which holds that the United States government
should depose foreign regimes that represent a threat
to the security of the United States, even if such threats
are not immediate and no attack is imminent. This
policy was used to justify the invasion of Iraq in March
2003.[4]
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
annarbormike —
Those sources include (quoted from the Wikipedia article):
# ^ a b c d Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America
Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order,
Cambridge University Press, 2004, ISBN-13:
978-0521674607
# ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp- dyn/content/blog/2008/09/12/BL2008091201471.html?
hpid=opinionsbox1
( http://tinyurl.com/3nd6d7 )
# ^ Michael Abramowitz, “Many Versions of ‘Bush
Doctrine’: Palin’s Confusion in Interview Understandable,
Experts Say” Washington Post September 13, 2008; Page
A01 online
# ^ Robert Jervis, “Understanding the Bush Doctrine,”
in Demetrios James Caraley ed., American Hegemony:
Preventive War, Iraq and Imposing Democracy (New
York: The Academy of Political Science, 2004), p. 14
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
annarbormike —
Please also note the following passage:
The main elements of the Bush Doctrine were delineated
in a National Security Council document, the National
Security Strategy of the United States, published on
September 20, 2002.[15] This document is often cited as
the definitive statement of the doctrine.[16][17][18] It
was updated in 2006 … [19]
I encourage you to check out the sources for that passage, as well.
You wrote:
•••
Charlie was very careful to say the following:
GIBSON: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September
2002, before the Iraq war.
•••
True. Too bad that clarification was not in his original question. Too bad so many are willing to give him a pass for not having done so, as a minimally fair journalist would have done.
You wrote:
•••
And many, many foreign policy experts agree that the root
of the Bush doctrine was stated in Sept. 2002, and that
statement introduced preemptive war.
•••
The root was never the issue. Please do not modify the circumstances of the moment under discussion retroactively: Charlie Gibson did not explicitly refer to any “root.” He referred very explicitly to the “Bush Doctrine,” as such. Most importantly, I ask you to take into account a longer view of history. Please note the following quote from Franklin Delano Roosevelt, another wartime President:
When you see a rattlesnake poised to strike, you do not
wait until he has struck to crush him.
— David Dallek, “Franklin Roosevelt and American
Foreign Policy: 1932-1945”, p. 288, Oxford University
Press (1979).
Sounds a lot like preemptive war to me, annarbormike. It may help you and others to understand that the Bush Administration has never made any pronouncement of policy that has officially been entitled, the “Bush Doctrine.” In the absence of something that they, at least, define that way, we must recognize the existence of a variety of understandings of what may be meant by the term. Thus, the reasonable inquiry, “In what respect, Charlie?” of Charlie Gibson by Sarah Palin (per the transcript):
GIBSON: Do you agree with the Bush doctrine?
PALIN: In what respect, Charlie?
Notice, and this is crucial, that Gibson does not clarify at this point. In short, he is evasive, refusing to be specific in response to her question as to what this fairly ill-defined term means in the context of his question:
GIBSON: The Bush — well, what do you — what do you
interpret it to be?
PALIN: His world view.
Following Gibson’s initial failure to define his terms and then his purposeful evasion, Palin punts. Gibson then makes his error of fact:
GIBSON: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September
2002, before the Iraq war.
As we have seen, that is a common mistake (see again both Krauthammer’s analysis and that of Dan Froomkin, one on the right and one on the left, both cited and linked to, above), and so of necessity involves erroneous presumption on Gibson’s part. Because Gibson makes this mistake, we can clearly see the wisdom of Palin’s cautious request for clarity. In addition, we see in a new and more revealing light not only the truth of the criticism of his first question of this series, but also the truth of his failure to clarify when legitimately requested to do so. Palin, bereft of accurate specifics from Gibson, goes general:
PALIN: I believe that what President Bush has attempted
to do is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who
are hell bent on destroying our nation. There have been
blunders along the way, though. There have been mistakes
made. And with new leadership, and that’s the beauty of
American elections, of course, and democracy, is with new
leadership comes opportunity to do things better.
At this juncture, Gibson offers yet another interpretation that is no more accurate than any of his others, given that it is anything but comprehensive or precise. However, it at least has the virtue of a certain limited concreteness. It would have been so much better, journalistically, had he at least adopted this from the beginning:
GIBSON: The Bush doctrine, as I understand it, is that
we have the right of anticipatory self-defense, that we
have the right to a preemptive strike against any other
country that we think is going to attack us. Do you
agree with that?
Here, Governor Palin, I believe, has decided that the confusion has become so great out of her interlocutor’s own mouth, that no detailed answer of any accuracy will be possible, so far afield has Gibson traipsed. Gibson is now asking her if she agrees with his erroneous interpretation. If she answers, “No,” there is every chance that she will be misinterpreted to be answering that she disagrees with the Bush Doctrine. She decides to punt, yet again, after hearing the immediately foregoing, which is Gibson’s fourth iteration:
PALIN: I agree that a president’s job, when they swear
in their oath to uphold our Constitution, their top priority
is to defend the United States of America.
I know that John McCain will do that and I, as his vice
president, if we are blessed with that vote of the
American people and are elected to serve and are sworn
in on January 20, that will be our top priority is to defend
the American people.
Gibson may think he is being a tough journalist, with what follows, his fifth attempt. He is not. He is being tendentious, biased, antagonistic and confusing. Note the difference between this and some of the earlier versions of the question, in that in this question, he now implicitly, albeit incorrectly, assumes the correctness of his interpretation of the Bush Doctrine. Also, note the inclusion of the subjective “feel” and “might, ” where earlier it had been “think” and “is going to”:
GIBSON: Do we have a right to anticipatory self-defense?
Do we have a right to make a preemptive strike against
another country if we feel that country might strike us?
Palin enunciates American foreign policy quite clearly and accurately, here, avoiding all of the traps Gibson has set:
PALIN: Charlie, if there is legitimate and enough
intelligence that tells us that a strike is imminent against
the American people, we have every right to defend our
country. In fact, the president has the obligation, the duty
to defend us.
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
annarbormike —
You wrote:
•••
Charles Krauthammer, though the first to use the term,
is not the sole authority on its use nor its definition.
•••
Krauthammer invented not just the term, but also the concept of the existence of a Bush Doctrine. He was the prime delineator of what the Bush Doctrine constituted. I think he is perfectly entitled to tell us what he meant when he invented it. Surely, no one is more entitled than he is to tell us what it meant when he invented it. He is also in the catbird seat when it comes to changes to that concept over time.
You wrote:
•••
He is one man, and it will be the consensus (or lack
thereof) of experts in foreign policy that will decide
how the term is applied.
•••
Facts are facts, as opposed to consensus about facts. A camel is what happens when a committee reaches consensus as to the design of a horse. Experts in foreign policy, however, as you admit, will decide over time how the term will be applied by those experts, which means there is no extant consensus. Since there is no consensus currently, how was Sarah Palin supposed to divine Charlie Gibson’s intent? Then, who will watch the watchers? Who will decide if the experts reached the appropriate judgment?
You wrote:
•••
So as far as pleasing everyone, Charlie referred to
the definition common at the origin of all the
contending “Bush Doctrines”.
•••
Surely, you must realize by now that even if that is correct (and I not only dispute that it is, but wish you would explain how you know, of all the possibilities, that is the correct one), it is nevertheless utterly immaterial. That is so because his first question certainly failed to explicitly do any such thing, no matter what you would like to impute to his intention after the fact. In view of reality, moreover, it would have been inappropriate for Sarah Palin or anyone else to assume what you say is so, based on Charlie Gibson’s first question. Not only that, but please do not beg the question as to the discrepancies between the questions.
You wrote:
•••
As a personal note,every class I’ve ever taken on
modern history since high school has never called
Krauthammer’s definition the “Bush Doctrine”. Most
of them went for a composite of ideas, but preemptive
war was always the core.
•••
You may wish a refund on that part of your education, given that Krauthammer originated the term. I think you would like to generalize from your observation, but sense, correctly, that it would be a logical fallacy to do so. Did you read Krauthammer’s article to which I linked?
You wrote:
•••
Don’t come out taking swings at people with
incomplete information.You end up looking just as
“ignorant” as you claim they do. I’ve been seeing too
many democrats and republicans go berserk with
nothing but an obscured fact to back them up. Calm
down, and have a discussion. Your unchecked gut
reactions do nothing but tear the country apart.
•••
It is unclear to whom the immediately foregoing is addressed. If you are addressing me in any part, I suggest you re-read the totality of my posts here, including the material at the links in support of the facts I have adduced. In no way do I “go berserk,” let alone, “with nothing but an obscured fact” [sic]. I have repeatedly introduced, not one fact, let alone an obscure one, but an entire range of them, with citations as to their basis.
You wrote:
•••
Definitions of the Bush Doctrine intentionally exclude
references to Islamic extremism to prevent from
limiting its scope, and Palin made it the core of her
initial response, which then spun off in some strange
direction about mistakes and the beauty of elections…
•••
Yet, despite your criticism of her response, we all know the Bush Doctrine aimed right at the target she identified. It has, from the very first, been aimed principally at the most evil, extreme, hyperviolent, pseudo-fundamentalist terrorists in the Islamic world, and most specifically, at those who attacked us on September 11, 2001, together with those who would do so again. Why dance around that fact in your criticism of Palin’s response, when it is the elephant in the room, annarbormike?
Beyond that, you say Governor Palin’s response, “spun off in some strange direction about mistakes and the beauty of elections ….” Let us examine Gibson’s question and Palin’s response:
GIBSON: No, the Bush doctrine, enunciated September 2002,
before the Iraq war.
PALIN: I believe that what President Bush has attempted to do
is rid this world of Islamic extremism, terrorists who are hell
bent on destroying our nation. There have been blunders along
the way, though. There have been mistakes made. And with
new leadership, and that’s the beauty of American elections, of
course, and democracy, is with new leadership comes
opportunity to do things better.
Palin is exactly correct about the target of the Bush Doctrine. She is also exactly correct about the fact that the Bush Administration has made blunders and mistakes. Finally, she is exactly correct yet again about the positive nature of our governmental structure, in that every four years, we have an opportunity to throw the old bums out and a whole new set of bums in, which is just what is going to happen this time around, no matter who is inaugurated in January. Did any of these things answer Gibson’s question? Yes. Fully? No, but then again, as I have demonstrated, Gibson’s series of questions, five in all, each concentrated on the Bush doctrine, shared flawed premises, shoddy scholarship as to the issue, and were clearly driven by a “gotcha” mentality.
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
annarbormike —
You wrote:
•••
Read this, it outlines a lot of the ideas even though
its a little dated:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nssall.html
•••
Read this, as it has been referred to by so many of the authors who have dealt with the subject of the Bush Doctrine:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss/2006/
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
annarbormike —
Read this, as it offers a great insight into Gibson’s failure and provides all the basis anyone needs to understand why Palin’s answers must be understood in the light of Gibson’s failure:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/blog/2008/09/12/BL2008091201471.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
( http://tinyurl.com/3nd6d7 )
Jacob Weisberg, in his book “The Bush Tragedy,” actually
identified six Bush Doctrines: Bush Doctrine 1.0 was
Unipolar Realism (3/7/99–9/10/01); Bush Doctrine 2.0
was With Us or Against Us (9/11/01–5/31/02); Bush
Doctrine 3.0 was Preemption (6/1/02–11/5/03); Bush
Doctrine 4.0 was Democracy in the Middle East (11/6/03—
1/19/05); Bush Doctrine 5.0 was Freedom Everywhere
(1/20/05– 11/7/06); and Bush Doctrine 6.0 (11/8/06 to date)
is the “absence of any functioning doctrine at all.”
Note also that neither Weisberg nor the author of the piece who names him, Dan Froomkin, are friends of Bush, nor by any stretch are they McCain or Palin supporters. It is beyond obvious that no one thing is definitely referred to as the “Bush Doctrine,” just as it is obvious that ABC’s Charlie Gibson had no handle on the real and full nature of what that term truly describes when he asked his series of five questions of Governor Palin. That makes what Gibson did wrong, confusing, journalistically unprofessional, and ultimately, unfair.
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
annarbormike —
You wrote:
•••
Palin really let me down with a lot of her responses,
and I believe a lot of other independents who have
been doing their homework and listening in for
something of substance to commit their vote to. Her
answers seemed scripted, and at some points largely
uninformed especially with regard to Russia…
•••
I agree that Palin’s answers were largely low-density when it came to real substance. I agree that it would have been better had she given more in-depth replies. I agree that she is not an expert on world affairs.
Having said all that, it is also clear to me that she is a quick study, has a good head on her shoulders, and from her history, does her homework industriously and with an attention to detail. She understands, I believe, what it is that she does not yet understand. Let us all take a deep breath and recall that Johnson, Carter, Reagan, Clinton and the younger Bush all came to the Presidency, let alone the Vice Presidency, long on domestic policy experience and short on foreign policy experience. There is a reason for that: unless one has active, involved experience as a Vice President of the United States, or is a prior Secretary of State or Defense, it is literally impossible for virtually any conceivable candidate — by which I mean past or sitting Governors, Senators or Representatives — to have formed the combination of experience and expertise we would all like to see in our Presidents and Vice Presidents.
It is for precisely that reason that we Americans look beneath mere policy positions to make our decisions, why we place such great emphasis on the character of candidates as we do, and why we constantly look for clues as to what the real character of each candidate is, versus their image. In the end, because we all know that the world is a dangerous and unpredictable place, what a great many of us — the ones who are not the hopeless prisoners of our ideology — are looking for is any assurance we can find that the person we elect will be able to handle what comes better than his or her opponent can. When I look at Barack Obama’s and Joe Biden’s records, I am aghast at how wrong each of them has been, and how often. Spare me the recitation of how wrong Bush, et al. have been: they are not running, and the attack on “McBush” has failed: no sensible person who pays any attention to politics believes John McCain is going to simply carry out the same policies Bush has had.
You wrote:
•••
Palin did not do a good job here, unless your standard
for her was low.Charlie was probably talking down to
her because she refused to give him clear, well thought
out answers to his questions. She went off on too many
digressions, and her conviction only really showed
itself on the simplest of issues. Locking in on the
mission and never blinking? I need a little more
cognition in my vice president than that.
•••
You mistake, here, I think, what the appropriate goal was for the McCain-Palin campaign, for this interview. All they had to do was have Governor Palin not hurt the McCain campaign. That, I think it is plain to see from the many reviews, they achieved. Universal approval? Certainly not. Criticism, some of it severe? Sure. She survived the interview largely intact, however. She made no blunders of the scale of Ford’s infamous Poland type. She stuck to her talking points well, and the innate reality of her character came through. I think many voters perceived Gibson’s treatment of Palin for what it was: journalistic malpractice, bias and condescension.
Ask yourself, annarbormike: into the themes of which campaign does Gibson’s conduct play? Most important of all, how was Sarah Palin’s performance in that particular situation generally perceived among independents, women and what the pollsters like to call the “persuadables”? She did just fine, is the bottom line.
finis
p.s. sorry for the confusion, if any, engendered by having to split the post up, but the filters are picky.
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Apparently, and more’s the pity, annarbormike’s original post has disappeared into the cornfield, perhaps never to be seen again. We are all the poorer. One hopes it will be restored at some point.
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
For mblack1 —
You wrote:
•••
Wake up conservative women.
•••
Conservative women, Independent women, and many, many Democrat women are awake and energized as never before by the candidacy of Sarah Palin. They need no false calls from mblack1 or anyone else who, in reality, would prefer they all go to sleep until after Election Day.
You wrote:
•••
You are being used.
•••
… by the Left, to the extent that you let their attempts, like this one, to sell you a lie, succeed.
You wrote:
•••
Ask yourself why Roe vs. Wade is still around. From 2000-2006, the situation was ideal for making abortion illegal, with Bush as president, a conservative majority on the Supreme Court and a conservative majority in the legislature. What you got was a conservative trifecta that did nothing.
•••
That statement by mblack1 is categorically false on multiple bases. First, let us consider an absolutely indisputable fact: the United States Senate was not in the control of a Republican majority, let alone a conservative one, for most of the first two years of the presidency of George W. Bush. On Thursday, May 24, 2001, Sen. James Jeffords of Vermont left the Republican Party and became an Independent, allied with Democrats. That act threw control of the Senate to the Democrat Party. Republicans did not regain control of the Senate until the election results of 2002 resulted in a majority beginning in January, 2003.
That is only part of the story, however. Even after the Republicans again gained control, they still lacked the necessary 60 votes to shut off debate. That meant that the whole time the Republicans were supposedly in control, the Democrats could block almost any legislation by filibuster.
All of that is still only a mere part of the story. If you read what mblack1 said closely, you may have noticed the claim that all three branches were in control, not merely of Republicans, but of what was claimed to be “a conservative trifecta.” Thus, the Senate would have to have been in “conservative” hands. That, too, is false. Of the nominally Republican Senators in office during this presidency, nowhere near all can accurately and truthfully be called “conservative,” particularly when it comes to the relevant issue: abortion. Republican Senators who support (or supported when they were in the Senate) at least some abortion rights have included Jim Jeffords (before he left the party), Arlen Specter, Susan Collins, Olympia J. Snowe, Lincoln Chafee, Chafee’s late father, Olympia Snowe, and Kay Bailey Hutchison — none of whom would vote to overturn Roe v Wade.
Where mblack1 leaves reality far behind is in describing the U.S. Supreme Court as “conservative” when it comes to this issue. We already know that there are no more than four votes on the current SCOTUS to overturn Roe v Wade, if that. How do we know? Let us look at the Chief Justice’s statement when he was up for confirmation in 2003 to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. He said of Roe v Wade that it is, “the settled law of the land.” Would Scalia, Thomas and Alito vote to overturn? Probably. Would Roberts? Possibly, but it is doubtful. Would John Paul Stevens, Ruth Ginsburg, David Souter or Stephen Breyer? Very definitely not. That leaves Justice Anthony Kennedy. In 1992, Kennedy voted against overturning Roe v Wade. Justice Kennedy dissented from the Court’s 2000 ruling invalidating the Nebraska partial birth abortion ban. It seems probable that Kennedy would vote to uphold Roe v Wade. Therefore, especially while Sandra Day O’Connor was on the Court, there was never a majority available to overturn Roe v Wade. None of these facts that mblack1 has ignored, misunderstood or misrepresented are in any way obscure.
You wrote:
•••
Do you really think Sarah Palin has the power to overturn Roe v. Wade?
•••
She would have to be the deciding factor in the pick, if any, by John McCain, or have succeeded him,and have her pick alter the current balance. Then, a case would have to come up while there was a true conservative voice on the court. Then, Roe v Wade would have to be overturned on a basis that was wide enough to change current law. That’s a whole pocketful of ifs.
You wrote:
•••
This is the carrot on the stick Republicans use to get you to the voting booth.
•••
Ummm, no. The Republicans are offering far more than the far-fetched notion that Sarah Palin is going to somehow be influential in the overturning of Roe v Wade. The fact that mblack1 doesn’t see it that way does not make it so. In fact, based on what we have seen so far, it would be wiser to bet against the judgment of mblack1.
You wrote:
•••
There is no political advantage for Republicans to make this issue go away.
•••
False. As we all should have learned long ago, good policy is good politics. Folks like mblack1 will always try to persuade you that doing the right thing is somehow not the right thing.
You wrote:
•••
If abortion was no longer on the table, our leadership would actually have to look at the plight of the poor and problems with the economy, not to mention healthcare coverage, gender inequality and support for working mothers.
•••
Sarah Palin has done much to address the plight of the poor. She and John McCain have shown in the past their willingness to buck the system. Governor Palin has been great for the economy of Alaska. McCain and Palin have a plan for getting the economy back on its feet and cleaning up Wall Street. McCain has a great plan for healthcare. Sarah Palin will make an excellent example for the young women of America, because her whole life has been a successful fight for gender equality. Support for working mothers? If mblack1 were serious about that, she’d vote for one: Palin for Vice President in ’08!
You wrote:
•••
Stop wasting your vote on this red herring issue.
•••
Shall we take the word of someone who has, in so many ways, proven to be egregiously wrong on the facts? No. Shall we take the word of someone who is so obviously on the pro-abortion side? No. When your opponent tells you that you are wasting your time, should you listen, or make up your own mind, independently? Obviously, the latter.
You wrote:
•••
It will never change because powerful conservatives don’t want it to change.
•••
Folks like mblack1 want you to believe they have a crystal ball. Do you? Of course you don’t believe any such foolishness!
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 15, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
For Nick —
You wrote:
•••
Ya know, if I’m in a fox hole, with some fancy weapon I am not familiar with andthere is enemy fire coming at me, I do NOT want a guy like me inthere. I want someone who knows more than me.
•••
You’re not actually in a foxhole, are you, Nick? The analogy is wholly inappropriate, it seems to me. You want to have a commander-in-chief share a foxhole.
Ever heard of basic training? That’s where you learn to shoot all the fancy weapons. You get to be the guy who knows how to use the weapons, then they send you to a foxhole. Maybe. Of course, you could take a series of student deferments during Vietnam like your hero, that noted plagiarist, Joe Biden, or your god, Barack Obama, the Left’s idea of a patriot, who claims he — once — “considered” serving his country in the armed forces.
You want a guy who knows more than you do, Nick? So, that would let Hillary and Sarah out then, right? Or do you concede that a woman can be commander in chief and you just misspoke, like your fearless leader, when he said there were “fifty-seven” states?
You wrote:
•••
I look at Palin and I have a business degree, now I do sales and forecasting and I think ,I could run Alaska. yup, I could.
•••
Your business degree begs at least one very important question, Nick: could you get elected the youngest governor in state history and the first of your sex, running against the sitting governor of your own party in the primary, and a popular governor of the other party in the general election? After nearly two years in office, Nick, could you garner a gaudy 80% approval rating from the people of your state? Do you already possess a serious, comprehensive degree of knowledge and experience in the oil and gas business, Alaska’s economic lifeline, Nick? Do you have a reputation of crusading — successfully — for ethics reform? Do you have a reputation for a consistent willingness to work with your political opponents across the aisle? Have you taken on the oil companies and beaten them — twice? Have you taken a failed gas pipeline deal, revived it, re-brokered it to the advantage of the people of your state, and gotten it funded? We don’t even have to discuss your never having had to confront and defeat the “old boys’ network,” do we?
Yeah, sure you “could.”
Trouble is, Nick, you just don’t want to admit that Sarah Palin is more of a man than … well, I don’t really have to say it, do I?
You wrote:
•••
but when I see these banks failing and i listen to the wallstreet reports I know that i would have no idea what to do about that if I was dropped into that as my job.
•••
It isn’t the job Sarah Palin or John McCain are running for, either. The Chairman of the Federal Reserve is an independent position, though appointed by the President. The Attorney General is supposed to be independent. The Chairman of the SEC is supposed to be independent. The Treasury Secretary has only limited powers with regard to failing private institutions. Presidents have the Council of Economic Advisors because only rarely do people come to the office with much in the way of training in the many spheres of economics. You and we have nothing to fear, Nick: nobody is going to drop you into any of those jobs.
You wrote:
•••
So I look at this women and I think, she is a journalism major, I actually know more about that stuff than her, do I feel comfortable with her taking control of things I would not be comfortable doing. F*ck no! This is f*cking insane.
•••
She’s “f*cking” fantastic, now that you mention it, Nick, but there’s only one of her. Your concerns are misplaced. She actually has a quite good, well-rounded and very relevant resume:
• Education: Wasilla High graduate, 1982; University of Idaho graduate, B.S. Communications – Journalism, 1987
• Occupation: Former Mayor, Wasilla, Alaska; Former Chairman, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission; present Governor of Alaska
• Political and Government Positions: Wasilla City Council; Wasilla City Mayor; President, Alaska Conference of Mayors; Alaska Municipal League Board; Chairman, Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission; Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission
• Business and Professional Positions: Sigma Beta Delta Honor Society, APU ; Valley Hospital Association Board; former American Management Association; Alaska Outdoor Council; Alaska Miner’s Association; Alaska Resource Development Council; Youth Court Steering Committee;
• Service Organizations: Lifetime NRA Member; Iditarod PTA; former Salvation Army Board; Various Chambers of Commerce; Valley Youth Sports Coach, Hockey Team Manager; Honorary Member, Rotary
• Special Interest : Hunting; Fishing; Snowmachining ; Running; Alaskan History; Biographical Histories of U.S. Founders
• Other: American Public Works Association, Alaska Chapter “Person of the Year” Award; State Chamber “Top 40 Under 40” Award
You wrote:
•••
I can’t vote for McCain wiht this person as his second.
•••
Sure, you can. You just have to try harder. Then again, who really believes you’re perfectly happy with that plagiaristic, foot-always-in-his-mouth party hack, Joe Biden? Why don’t you just admit that you made up your mind to vote for Obama long before you posted this silly attack on Governor Palin?
You wrote:
•••
what the hell was he thinking?
•••
He was thinking of what is best for his country, just like he always does. You ought to try it sometime. It would do you good.
You wrote:
•••
Is it too late to lose this women?
•••
Again: there’s only one of her, Nick. Hadn’t you noticed? What you’re really wondering, of course, is if it’s not too late to drop Biden like a bad habit and get Hillary on the ticket. That would have been the smart play, if Obama had had the stones, but alas and alack, he clearly did not. That gave Senator McCain an opening big enough to drive a semi truck and trailer through. Result: Palin. That’s why McCain is now leading in so many of the battleground states, not to mention the national polls. That must be terribly vexing.
How’s the Obama convention bounce going?
Posted by: Major Undertaking | September 16, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am