By Lee Speigel

Sep 4, 2008 10:49pm

Does McCain Have a Different Take on Community Organizing?

ABC News’ Deputy Political Director Karen Travers points out that, despite all the "community organizer"-bashing at this convention, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., seems to like the notion, at least based on this passage:

"If you find faults with our country, make it a better one. If you’re disappointed with the mistakes of government, join its ranks and work to correct them. Enlist in our armed forces. Become a teacher. Enter the ministry. Run for public office. Feed a hungry child. Teach an illiterate adult to read. Comfort the afflicted. Defend the rights of the oppressed. Our country will be the better, and you will be the happier. Because nothing brings greater happiness in life than to serve a cause greater than yourself."

If a community organizer isn’t someone "defend(ing) the rights of the oppressed," or getting involved to correct the mistakes of government, what is it?

- jpt

User Comments

Mr. Tapper writes: “If a community organizer isn’t someone ‘defend(ing) the rights of the oppressed,’ or getting involved to correct the mistakes of government, what is it?”
Think Lynne Thigpen’s character in the film “Lean on Me,” Mr. Tapper. That is the classic portrayal of a “community activist”–someone who exploits and rides grievances in order to enhance and build one’s own power.
For the record, I doubt Obama’s “activism” was sinister in the way that the late Ms. Thigpen’s character’s activism is portrayed as being–but it’s hard not to believe that it was every bit as self-interested and with a view to having a stepping stone to bigger and better things.
Big difference between that and what John McCain was speaking about.

Posted by: Bald Eagle | September 4, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Now can we just clear the air here. Sarah Palin did not criticize community organizers, what she explained though is that a community organizer is like a mayor, but without responsibility.
That is not an attack. It is a comparison, and an accurate one at that.
Most important Sarah’s honest comparison was in response to the Obambi compaigns attempt to diminish and insult Sarah’s work as a mayor for two days prior to her speech.

Posted by: JAZ | September 4, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

A mayor has less responsibility than a community organizer (especially when most of their executive duties are actually done by a town administrator, like in Wasilla).
Community organizers are the epitome of responsibility.
My greatest heroes are community organizers – Cesar Chavez and Bayard Rustin, of course; but Sam Adams and Thomas Paine as well.

Posted by: Mike | September 4, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

well JAZ that shows how a mayor of a town of 7000 has no clue what service without reward is….
and…what community organizing encompasses.

Posted by: dl | September 4, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Jaz,
Its was ssaid with contempt and derision.
You can’t pretend otherwise.
The Foxnews chuckleheads loved it for being a put down. Even going further “what’s a community organizer do?” with the same snide derision.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Among Sara Palin’s responsibilities as mayor:
1. Tell all town employees to submit their resignations as a ‘sign of loyalty’. Sound like the mob, much?
2. Hire a federal lobbyist for a town of 7000.
3. Collect $27 Million in federal pork.
4. Fire the longtime police chief because he proposed changing ordinances to close bars at 3AM instead of 5AM!

Posted by: John's conscience | September 4, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

I am a hard core republincan but, I must admit this speech by McCain was boring and more of the samething. We are going to loose. McCain is done.

Posted by: Bill | September 4, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Bill,
Obama is going to lose.

Posted by: geevill | September 4, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Not the best speech by McCain. Palin was a bit better. As an independent I will now support the Obama/Biden ticket. I think what I saw today by the republicans will be more of the same.

Posted by: William McBride | September 4, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Bad speech for McCain

Posted by: Vanessa | September 4, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

The point is …OBAMA does not have even the EXECUTIVE experience of the GOP VP Candidate-Palen. That is a fact. You can spin. You can try to divert the subject but it does not change reality. You know it and I know it.
Denial is Dangerous

Posted by: J | September 4, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Um, J–McCain has no executive experience either. So, no matter who wins, we are going to be led by a novice. I would just rather vote for the novice I like…

Posted by: Jenni | September 4, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

“That is not an attack. It is a comparison, and an accurate one at that. ”
Explain that to the crowd that went “ooooh!” and explain away her other crack against them at the end of her speech.

Posted by: Goon | September 4, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Today McCain’s speech is less flashy than Obama’s, but more integrity and matureness.
Yes We McCan.

Posted by: young_voter | September 4, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Funny, I had the same thought.
Which led me to another:
During the primaries, when Obama and Hillary where still fighting and McCain had secured the nomination, I remember thinking that regardless of who of the three won, America was moving towards a brighter future. Now, with Palin on the ticket, I don’t think that way anymore.
McCain is allright, but there is no way I could ever vote for a ticket with a right wing radical a heartbeat away from the presidency. We’ve had enough of that in the last 8 years.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 4, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

I like McCain more, he is stright, hs is consistent.
Obama is just a blatant opportunist. He happened to oppose the war years ago, now he sees we get benifit, he kind of regret

Posted by: golfgirlusa | September 4, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Again, Sarah Palin does not have the education level to even teach a class, let along to be the vice president of this country.

Posted by: LA in Indiana | September 4, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

After tonight I’m convinced Obama will beat McCain in the debates. Bad speech for McCain.
And what’s with the green background again?

Posted by: Vanessa | September 4, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

In the end I ask myself how important is it that our president gives a good speech? I’m more concerned about getting the country back on track and feeling safe. McCain is the only one who gives me that warm fuzzy feeling. Not that I think Obama is a bad person but I just think there is to much rhetoric but it’s not enough for me.

Posted by: GregW | September 4, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

SENATOR OBAMA, PLEASE LET AMERICA IN ON YOUR THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS CONCERNING THIS US JUDICIAL INJUSTICE ???
LETS ALL HOPE OUR MEDIA FRIENDS ALSO SHOW AN INTEREST IN REPORTING ON THIS AMERICAN HORROR FACING THESE (TENS OF THOUSANDS) FORGOTTEN AND TRAPPED POORER AMERICANS, AND HOW THIS POSSIBLE FUTURE PRESIDENTIAL CONTENDER HANDLES THIS VERY SERIOUS ISSUE FACING LATINO AND BLACK AMERICAN COMMUNITIES ????
**WITH 80% OF THE BLACK AMERICAN VOTERS SAYING THEY SUPPORT SENATOR OBAMA IN THIS PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, IT IS ONLY FAIR FOR EVERYONE TO KNOW PRIOR BEING ELECTED OUR NEXT PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES HOW THIS DEMOCRATIC SENATOR TRULY FEELS ABOUT THIS AMERICAN JUDICIAL HORROR CONTINUING TO INFLICT GRAVE HARM ON THE BLACK AMERICAN FAMILIES AND THEIR COMMUNITIES NATIONWIDE ??????
*** WHEN GOD’S FACE BECAME VERY RED ***
THE US SUPREME COURT GAVE ENEMY COMBATANTS FEDERAL APPEAL HC RIGHTS LAWYERS AND PROPER ACCESS TO US FEDERAL COURTS,AND POORER AMERICANS (MANY EVEN ON DEATH ROW) ARE DENIED PROPER FEDERAL APPEAL LEGAL REPRESENTATION TO OUR US FEDERAL COURTS OF APPEAL, AND ROTTING IN AMERICAN PRISONS NATIONWIDE ?????????
**** INNOCENT AMERICANS ARE DENIED REAL HC RIGHTS WITH THEIR FEDERAL APPEALS !
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE $LOWLY FINDING OUT HOW EA$Y IT I$ FOR MIDDLE CLA$$ AND WORKING POOR AMERICAN$ TO FALL VICTIM TO OUR U$ MONETARY JUDICIAL $Y$TEM.
****WHEN THE US INNOCENT WERE ABANDONED BY THE GUILTY ****
The prison experts have reported that there are 100,000 innocent Americans currently being falsely imprisoned along with the 2,300,000 total US prison population nationwide.
Since our US Congress has never afforded poor prison inmates federal appeal legal counsel for their federal retrials,they have effectively closed the doors on these tens of thousands of innocent citizens ever being capable of possibly exonerating themselves to regain their freedom through being granted new retrials.
This same exact unjust situation was happening in our Southern States when poor and mostly uneducated Black Americans were being falsely imprisoned for endless decades without the needed educational skills to properly submit their own written federal trial appeals.
This devious and deceptive judicial process of making our poor and innocent prison inmates formulate and write their own federal appeal legal cases for possible retrials on their state criminal cases,is still in effect today even though everyone in our US judicial system knows that without proper legal representation, these tens of thousands of innocent prison inmates will be denied their rightful opportunities of ever being granted new trials from our federal appeal judges!!
Sadly, the true US *legal* Federal Appeal situation that occurs when any of our uneducated American prison inmates are forced to attempt to submit their own written Federal Appeals (from our prisons nationwide) without the assistance of proper legal counsel, is that they all are in reality being denied their legitimate rights for Habeas Corpus and will win any future Supreme Court Case concerning this injustice!
For our judicial system and our US Congressional Leaders Of The Free World to continue to pretend that this is a real and fair opportunity for our American Middle Class and Working Poor Citizens, only delays the very needed future change of Federal Financing of all these Federal appeals becoming a normal formula of Our American judicial system.
It was not so very long ago that Public Defenders became a Reality in this country.Prior that legal reality taking place, their were also some who thought giving anyone charged with a crime a free lawyer was a waste of taxpayers $$.
This FACADE and HORROR of our Federal Appeal proce$$ is not worthy of the Greatest Country In The World!
***GREAT SOCIETIES THAT DO NOT PROTECT EVEN THEIR INNOCENT, BECOME THE GUILTY!
A MUST READ ABOUT AMERICAN INJUSTICE:
1) YAHOO AND 2) GOOGLE
MANNY GONZALES THE KID THAT EVERYONE FORGOT IN THE CA PRISON SYSTEM. ** A JUDICIAL RIDE OF ONES LIFE !
lawyersforpooramericans@yahoo.com (424-247-2013)

Posted by: DOUGLAS FIELD | September 4, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

This speech was boring and cannot make up for the slimefest that the RNC has been this year. I am disgusted and I want better for my country, as a young person. These people have nothing to offer and McCain is stealing Barack Obama’s message because he knows the voters like it. Barack Obama is authentic and Barack and Michelle Obama were both uplifting during the DNC. The same cannot be said of the RNC at all. Where was the diversity, the ideas, the policies, the optimism? What a sad joke.

Posted by: Jessica | September 4, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

McCain gave a sturdy speech. He may not have the big ideas or care for the underpriveleged that Obama has, but he will keep our country militarized and strong in the face of encroaching Terror. Obama is more concerned with helping poor people and the homeless, with making sure that there is NO torture even when people threaten America. Obama wants to read people their rights before arresting them. This is a new world and we CANNOT play into the Terrorists’ hands. We must keep on the offensive. That is attacking. We must keep attacking terrorists or we will all be poor or peaceful or conquered. This is really a vote fore whether we want to lose the war or go all in, all of us, put our money where our mouths are. We must put everything into the War on Terror or we will not have any children left to be poor. McCain – Palin 2008 is our only hope. Don’t vote for the coward enemy, vote for McCain.

Posted by: Ned Fianchetto | September 4, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

What do you do when people believe our safety is the issue and they want McCain? Why do people believe the Reps will help us with threats of war if we don’t get what we want? There was a gathering of 59 adults and 57 believe McCain will keep us safe and they were sold on his energy ideas and tax cuts. They won’t listen to me. Not that I am voting Democrat either. Luckily, we’re not a swing state. I just worry how many more people feel like these people did….It’s eeerie.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

I had a lot of laughs last night. But I too don’t get the McCain appeal to people. I mean, yes he seems to be a good man, Clinton and Biden even say so, but people view him as a Maverick. I too don’t get it. All the people here are acting like that is what they were waiting to hear him say. They’re talking about his decency and gas at the same time. CNN is playing the stand up part again and they’re all YES again. Okay…. OOPS. TV’s off. That’s it. They heard wanted. Good night all. HIllary, where are you? Come back…..

Posted by: irma | September 5, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Ned, This country is no safer than on 9/10. It is in fact less secure. We can’t have anymore shoot first and ask questions (and make up lies) later foreign policy. This is what John McBush is. He’s a war mongering angry old man. (and a POW if you haven’t heard)This country needs ANYONE but McFudd in the whitehouse.

Posted by: Tom | September 5, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

JAZ,
Obama was a community organizer in the mid-1980s. Since then he’s been a State Senator for 8 years and a US Senator for 4 years (and head of the Harvard Law Review).
Sarah Palin was the Mayor of Wasilla 18 months ago.
See the problem? This comparison does not work for Palin.

Posted by: Elrod | September 5, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Is he asking more people to join the government?
I thought that they were against bigger government.

Posted by: Jay Severin Has A Small Pen1s | September 5, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Right-wing Republicans like Sarah Palin deride community organizers because they strongly dislike the people community organizers serve.

Posted by: Ari | September 5, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

I would bank on Obama’s speech drawing in double digit millions of more viewers by Nielsen.

Posted by: kat | September 5, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

I retract my previous rather off topic response. Okay, I’ll bet that the viewers for Obama’s speech surpassed McCain’s in the single digit millions. It’s like McCain was mollifying Palin’s speech which derided community organizing.

Posted by: kat | September 5, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

I am a registered D and I see for the first time fear in the comments that are being said against the R party.
I have been asking one question concerning the staff that was sent to cover the Conventions. Why would ABC send people like George S and Diane S, and Chris to cover such an important event?? Charlie is the only one that does his job right. He does not show what his party is, as it should be.
The rest of them are all Demograts to the bone. Taking shots at the Republican party on every turn. When did ABC lose the great professionalism that at one time was so admired. Give the news, NOT personal opinion.
ABC’s rating’s will suffer I promise if this continues. Get back to just giving the news for both parties, that is what American’s need to hear. We can listen to all the debates and make our own decisions. Slander from the Newscasters is not needed. It is like we cannot see the errors for ourselves. Stop insulting the people who support ABC is all I ask!!!
This is sad to me.

Posted by: nurseg | September 5, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

Sorry McCain, too little, 24 hours too late. Your VP pick energized me to “community organize” your ticket to defeat.

Posted by: minimlst | September 5, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

Ned, I highly recommend you read “Nineteen Eighty-Four.” Seriously, the sooner the better.

Posted by: VictorLaszlo | September 5, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

B. Eagle writes: “For the record, I doubt Obama’s “activism” was sinister in the way that the late Ms. Thigpen’s character’s activism is portrayed as being–but it’s hard not to believe that it was every bit as self-interested and with a view to having a stepping stone to bigger and better things.
Big difference between that and what John McCain was speaking about. ”
Duly noted. So wait…why is it “hard not to believe” Obama’s work as a community organizer was self-interested? Because he went on to politics? Obviously Obama WANTED to be an organizer. That’s why he dedicated his time to it. I’m having trouble understanding why that is somehow wrong even if he thought the experience would be a useful, formative one.
Mind you, Obama was a community organizer AFTER graduating Harvard Law. With that JD behind him, he could have easily chosen to do what I’m doing…work at a major law firm earning bank and help no one but big corporations and myself.
Care to clarify, because maybe I’m missing some hidden logic…

Posted by: Dwntwn Atty | September 5, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am

The 800 pound gorilla in the room, (it has to be said), is that MCcain is too old. He is past his time. He represents the past (Palin though young, is really more of the same, bluster, old ideas and no real vision). He’d have been a better president than Bush, but that’s all in the past now too. The country wants to move into the future, (the right will come kicking and screaming). The youth are well educated have the ideas, want to take over the mantle and move the country forward into a bright new direction. Having vision means seeing and getting on the right side of history.

Posted by: Hek | September 5, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am

its one thing to be passionate about your party but its the USA we’re talking about here, a super power… a McCain/Palin looks like comic to me in representing this country.

Posted by: dave58 | September 5, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am

so, forget about all the “community organizing” and all the frivolous things that have been said and LOOK at WHO the candidates are and what they stand for. BOTH see that its “time for a change” but what change is good for the ENTIRE COUNTRY. so far what I have head from the left has been mudslinging and propaganda… CHECK IT OUT PEOPLE! get FACTS on the issues that matter, dont just listen to ear tickling, throw in some DISCORD and see what rings true! as far as the right, there has been mudslinging and propaganda too, but think about who is being sliced to ribbons by the media… is it Mr community organizer or is it “are you REALLY that childs mother? can you balance a JOB and CHILDREN??” to ANY american woman that is an INSULT!

Posted by: Edward | September 5, 2008, 5:58 am 5:58 am

Obama seems to be putting his skills as a community organizer to use in the campaign. Here in Virginia, he’s got an army of energized volunteers working in communities Gore and Kerry simply ignored. That’s one key reason Virginia could turn blue this year.

Posted by: Jet | September 5, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am

Jet,
I think that the bigger issue here is… Which candidate is taking money from who?
And I think that all of Bush’s big money oil supporters have gone over to the Democratic side.
And yet again they (the supporters) have hung McCain out to dry! ;-)
McCain-Palin 2008

Posted by: Jennifer | September 5, 2008, 6:42 am 6:42 am

A community organizer is the person who goes in and cleans up the mess when decades of federal regulations are relaxed so that unscrupulous businesspeople can prey on those who either don’t know any better or who don’t have any other options.
Oh, and then the businessperson looses one or more of their homes as well.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 5, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Hey JAZ,
You really see no subtext in her tone and timing?
You might need a community organizer someday.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 5, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

John McCain Campaign, John McCain and Sarah Palin, made it loud and clear community organizers are worthless!!! That is/was the message!! They claim over and over no leadership skills required. They say we are worthless! No leadership skills demonstrated by community organizers! It is clear Republicans are all for corporations and the super rich. Grassroots Community Organizers were blasted disgracefully with force! Over and over!!

Posted by: Sharonklim | September 5, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

I thought McCain’s speech was heartfelt, sincere and I suspect he would actually take on special interest. This guy does not have anything to gain or lose, but to leave the country better off. He’s not in a phase of life where he cares about career building or status. This could work to our advantage as a country.

Posted by: rafraf | September 5, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Great! I’ll do some community organizing and then maybe I’ll run for President in 2012…see how far I get.

Posted by: Area504 | September 5, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

The entire Republican convention was mean. McCain’s speech was perhaps the least mean of the bunch, but even still, it was mean. I don’t remember *any* speech at the Democratic convention that prompted people to repeatedly “boo” at the opposing party or its candidates (as McCain’s did). The attacks lodged by the Democrats were attacks on policy, on ideas – NOT attacks on character. Everyone at the Democratic convention was very respectful of McCain’s character and accomplishments, and made their case for what they wanted to do differently without resorting to belittling what he had done.
The one thing that became increasingly clear to me this week was just how much John McCain has been pinned in by a party of ideologues and religious zealots. I used to believe that he was the “maverick” he presents himself as, but I think he’s really lost his way. The GOP isn’t the same party it was twenty years ago, and McCain’s not the same man he was even 8 years ago. Up until the last month or so, I thought that a choice between Obama and McCain would still be a win-win when compared to the last eight years. The selection of Palin has made me think that electing McCain would be like more Bush, only worse. And the rabid, ugly attacks of the last few nights have confirmed that what’s left of what used to be the Republican Party is a fringe element that needs to be stopped from attaining more power.
Someone needs to grow a spine and split that party in two. The real conservatives can go one way, and the fundamentalist culture warriors can go the other. They might say they want the same things, but the fault lines are showing, and it’s the rest of America who is paying the price for their party’s personality disorder.

Posted by: thisniss | September 5, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

So many in the biased media seem determined to miss the point.
I didn’t view Sarah Palin’s speech as a put down on community organizers. It was a put down on Barack Obama’s qualifications to be POTUS.
Of course, let’s also forget that Obama put her down for being a “small-town mayor” so I guess that’s a put down of ALL small town mayors (they’re probably bitter and clinging, right?) Obama conveniently failed to mention that she is also a governor, with executive experience and responsibilities, but the liberal media doesn’t bother to fact-check what comes out of the mouth of The Anointed One.
If I had the choice between electing a community organizer or a small town mayor for ANY executive position, I would hire the small town mayor. That’s the point Sarah Palin was making. But if it makes you feel better to twist her words around, you can enjoy your new hobby for the next 4 years when she gives speeches as the Vice President of the United States.

Posted by: Area504 | September 5, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Obama got into political organizing to build a base of support for a future political run. How much work did he actually do – as opposed to how much work he took credit for? Ask Hazel Johnson.
I’m a volunteer in my community and I’m not insulted by the jabs at Obama. He’s never done the heavy lifting on anything – see Emil Jones for reference on his IL State Senate record – yet he’s always front and center to bask in the limelight and take the credit.
Obama is a phony.

Posted by: marylou | September 5, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Correction: Obama got into COMMUNITY organizing yada yada yada!

Posted by: marylou | September 5, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

People misunderstand what Obama did as a “Community Organizer” in Chicago. He was not helping the poor or working at the soup kitchen.
He was a political operative working as an instructor for a group called ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now). The ACORN mob is infamous for its bully tactics (which they dub “direct actions”); Obama supporters have recounted his role in organizing an ambush on a government planning meeting about a landfill project opposed by Chicago’s minority lobbies.
Obama organized the community to do the things ACORN wanted done.

Posted by: Sally J. | September 5, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

The first week after she was on the job, she fired many long term gov’t staff in this small town.
Sarah’s work as mayor included hiring a Washington lobbist to get as much money – in pork projects – that she could. So much for the reformer.
She tried to fire the librarian, who refused to rid the shelves of books she, as a Catholic, didn’t like.
She left the town, that was not in debt, with a $20M debt. She added a new sports complex building built on land that to this day, is still being battled over by lawyers.
She lied in her “Bridge to Nowhere” – “I told them no thanks” meme. She championed it, and flip-flopped only after the national outrage all but canned the project. Alaska, however, still kept the FED money, and built a road to the edge of the island of 50 people.
Wow, that is some executive experience resume.
Obama’08

Posted by: ShorelineCT | September 5, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Travers is absolutely right on this. A great Obama-Biden ad would take that comment by McCain and then follow it up with Guiliani’s and Palin’s attacks on community organizing, complete with the laughter from the GOP convention crowd.

Posted by: Seth Zlotocha | September 5, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Obviously Karen Travers is a liberal. Their has been no “bashing”, just a proper context of what obama has accomplished. Racial agitator or street extortionist is a better description of his career. Was Karen Travers taught to hide her own political agenda in school?

Posted by: proudrapper | September 5, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

a community organizer can mean lots of things. it can be people who perpetrate voter registration fraud, like ACORN. it can be the mob and union thugs intimidating workers. it can be people passing out street money to buy votes on election day. it can be rabble-rousers breaking and burning. it can be career protesters who can’t hold an honest job. it can be political hacks trying to brown-nose their way into the local machine. it can be a vietnam vet leading meetings where they vote on whether or not to murder a member of congress. in some cases, they actually do some good, probably more than anyone in the illinois state legislature has done in the last 20 years, but like source-checking articles written by law profs, it’s hardly relevant to the job being sought.

Posted by: Neil | September 5, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Wait upon the sick, the
afflicted, the poor and
the downtrodden.
Serving people is serving
God.
Community service is exalted
work.

Posted by: anon | September 5, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Karen Travers is a partisan sycophantic hack for obama. Let Brian Ross handle the obama related propaganda.How about some investigative reporting on ACORN and its role in the sub prime mortgage mess. ACORN extorted the mortgage business. Was obama complicit in that mortgage industry extortion? Tell Karen Travers and Tapper to get with Ross if they need guidance. GOP commercials are on the way. Get ready…

Posted by: angerlady | September 5, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Someone said on this blog that they will become a community organizer and then run for POTUS in 2012. Well, I think you meant 2032 not 2012 b/c Obama was a CO in 1984 right out of college and during his summers off from law school. Yes, how sinister and calulating for a young man to leave a NYC job, take a pay-cut and move to a new city to work for Catholic Churches to help people. If he was able to forsee this work as a precursor to POTUS, he can see the future.

Posted by: stacey | September 5, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Neil
Community organizing can indeed mean many things. It can mean democracy; it can mean compassion; it can mean civilization. “Whosoever does it to the least of these my brethren, does it to me.”
Jesus was a community organizer;
Pontius Pilate was a governor.

Posted by: jock59801 | September 5, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Obama and McCain are addressing a national organization for community organizers on Sept 11th. I wonder if he will the CO bashing message from the RNC to their convention. Or maybe he will be man enuf to apoligize for allowing his party to diss them just to score points against Obama. I guess CO’s are just collateral damage in this war of words.

Posted by: stacey | September 5, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

In John McCain’s memoir, he declares that he makes decisions by gut instinct and then lives with the consequences. In these days, this is not the person I want leading the country. Living with consequences is fine when it affects only yourself and your immediate family; however, the entire country would have to live with the consequences, good or ill, of John McCain’s gut decisions. Despite his rhetoric of being against war, he has openly declared his intention of promoting war on an ongoing basis. He has not provided any comprehensive policies to correct the economic, politic, and social issues facing the nation. Rather, he spouts Republican talking points and support negative attacks on his opponents. We do not need a gambler as chief executive and commander in chief of the country.
As regards Sarah Palin, I don’t care how she manages her family. That is her concern and should remain private. I do care that she went after earmarks for her small town to the tune of $27m, but left the town $20m in debt. I do care that she raised taxes. I do care that she is now refusing to cooperate with the authorities investigating abuse of power allegations in her home state, and insisting that the case be reviewed by a board of her appointees. She tried to fire a librarian in her town for refusing to remove books that Palin found objectionable. She has no national military authority over the Alaska National Guard and there have been no natural disasters that would let us judge her ability to exercise effective judgment in an emergency. Sarah Palin is a unacceptable VP candidate and the reasons have nothing to do with her sex. What we know of her career does not demonstrate a substantial grasp of good management principles. Let her confront the press like any other candidate and answer the same tough questions they must face. If she is not available, she has no credibility.
For me, here is the key point about the Republicans versus the Democrats. The Republicans have embraced an anti-choice religion-based philosophy at the core of its values. It is not pro-life to mandate that the citizens do not have a choice about what they do with their bodies, minds and spirits; it is anti-choice. Sarah Palin and her ilk do not have the right or authority to sit in judgment on the choices I make in my personal life. Their determination to control my ability to make choices that affect only myself is all the reason I need to cast my vote elsewhere.
John McCain and the Republicans have tried to co opt the message of change. They have seduced the citizens of this country for years with promises of safety and the American dream. None of us are better off after 8 years of Republican control, except the corporations who are generating their wealth from your sweat or the sweat of laborers overseas. Now they want you to believe that their nominees will ‘change’ the policies that have lined the pockets of their primary supporters. Do not believe their hype!

Posted by: KDP | September 5, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

Even worse then the community organizing bashing that they all got a rollicking good laugh about was Rudy G. actually MOCKED the ideal of the American Dream and the entire audience laughed. What a bunch of sick individuals.
Do they comprehend that they cannot win with just their base? This whole week was pandering to the already converted. I don’t see a single democrat being swayed, nor many, if any, independents. Their are a lot more dems registered to vote this year, this seems a losing strategy.

Posted by: MCCAIN LOSING HIS BEARINGS | September 5, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

WOW! I am amazed by the comments. Get off your butts and get out there and help someone ELSE today and then come back and criticize all those that help a neighbor. Amazing…

Posted by: Mego | September 5, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

A fine question. What is it? Is it one thing? Are there many types? With many agendas? The traction this line got at the RNC comes, I suspect, from the fact that very few Americans have any idea what is meant by this liberal/noble-sounding but very vague title.

Posted by: Judasmac | September 5, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

When you think about the very definition of what a “community organizer” is and does, then would it not be a valid argument that John McCain was a “community organizer” during his time as a POW?

Posted by: TakingBackTheUSA | September 5, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

I think that most of the comments about community organizing were simply defending Gov. Palin’s experience as Mayor. It’s been the Dems. who’ve been mocking her experience as Mayor of a small town, but to whom does a community organizer go when they want something done?

Posted by: Jason | September 5, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“Obama is more concerned with helping poor people and the homeless, with making sure that there is NO torture even when people threaten America. Obama wants to read people their rights before arresting them.”
OMG, really?? Thanks for getting that terrifying information out there. I certainly don’t want someone in the highest office in the land who has compassion for the poor and homeless, or who opposes torture, or who believes in upholding the Miranda Law under the Supreme Court. Where would that lead? Why, we might even be a country that once again upholds the constitutional rights of its citizens, and has respect around the world. We must put a stop to this immediately.

Posted by: BMS | September 5, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Certainly not qualifications for President.

Posted by: John | September 5, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Community organizers are people who see the problems, often caused or ignored by government, which face their neighbors on a daily basis and who stand up and say “We can fix this!”
I take this personally. For years I have spent almost all of my time as a community organizer, without one cent of pay.
I live in a small town, slightly larger than Weasel. Far too often in small towns the mayor or town council is the heart of the problem. Community organizers are the ones who say “Hold on Your Honor, you ain’t the boss of me.”
Community organizers are the ones whole stand up for the town librarian when the mayor tries to bully her into banning books. They speak up for the municipal employee fired for not backing the mayor’s re-election campaign.
If the McCain campaign wants to try to paint Obama as the entrenched power and themselves as the voice of the little guy, how dare they try do it by trashing community organizers?

Posted by: jonathan swiller | September 6, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

I just noticed that my spell check over-ruled me in the post below and changed Wasilla to weasel.
While I might apply that term to Rudy Giuliani after his sneers on Wednesday I have no reason to attach it to a town that I don’t know. My apologies.

Posted by: jonathan swiller | September 6, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

“Tis” author Frank McCourt, noted, he gives back every April 15, 2008: He pays a lot in taxes.
Of course, he was a school teacher for many years.
He noted the snob community always noted
ya, Frank is “just a school teacher”, like maybe hardly in contributing society(if that).
When Rudy G was mocking and making fun of Obama as “just a community organizer”, it is the same mind–snob– set.
But, one thing is most curious, and hopefuly Jack Tapper can help us out:
Obama notes he was a “civil rights” attorney. His book “Audacity…” notes nothing on any big case he handled as a civil rights attorney, none, nada, there is nothing on any big jury trial he had for some lowly citizen, as to Obama standing up in court for some lowly citizen.NADA on that, too.
Why is that, why is it Jack Tapper, or NBC, others at ABC, or CNN, never looked into that, is it that the Networks(MSM—Main Stream Media) hire so many people in legal affairs matters who are totally ignorant about the U S justice system, and just fake it in their reporting. SAD,
The shoddy reporting in America, on so much is the real scandal

Posted by: Brent | December 8, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.