By Nitya

Sep 26, 2008 10:14pm

Fact Check: Obama Misleads on $250,000 Tax Claim

ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Nitya Venkataraman Report: During Friday’s presidential debate, Sen. Barack Obama provided a loose interpretation of his tax plan, saying that those making less than $250,000 a year "will not see one dime’s worth of tax increase."

It’s not entirely true.

Obama has called for higher taxes on income, capital gains and dividends for individuals making $200,000 per year; his tax plan imposes higher taxes on couples starting at $250,000 a year.

User Comments

Same old Obama – twists every word, every sentence until it becomes an out and out lie!

Posted by: dl | September 26, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

I have always found something suspicious about Obama’s claim that 95% of Americans will not pay taxes.
There has to be a catch.
And also, Obama’s already back to his “I’ll agree with John/Hillary on that one.”

Posted by: Lee | September 26, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Good! If you are a couple making that much money, you’re rich. Works for me!

Posted by: David | September 26, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

McCain is clearly more fully versed, educated and experienced. While McCain is full of specifics, Obama, as always, is full of general comments. Does it bother anyone else that Sen. McCain always references Sen. Obama, as Sen. Obama, whereas Obama, consistently shows disrespect my calling Sen. McCain “John”?

Posted by: Dani | September 26, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Well, there isn’t enough space on the internet to write about all the lies and twisted realities McCain has thrown around during this debate. He has either misunderstood or just flat out lied about his opponent’s position on nuclear energy and even his own advisers’ positions on negotiations with Iran. McCain tries at every turn to attack Obama, lie or truth. At least Barack Obama uses facts to attack his opponent.

Posted by: Walker | September 26, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

I am sure Obama is misleading about his entire tax plan.
If you look closely at it. It is identical to The German post war, miracle economy plan, It worked them with the situation they were in, and the circumstances of the times. I do not Think it can work today in the USA.
No matter how he does it, we still will have to pay for our own defense.
Most of Obama’s other plans and policies were borrowed, made up or just a way to sweet talk people into voting for him.

Posted by: seah | September 26, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

What bothers me is McCain blatant campaign of lies, propaganda, and shielding from the press. On his campaign, Rick Davis, received $15000 per MONTH from Freddie Mac since 2005, as reported last Monday, and McCain hasn’t fired him.

Posted by: David | September 26, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Lee
You just gave me a reason to vote for John McCain. You are a deadbeat

Posted by: jjpglobal | September 26, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Obama tonight twisted what he has said in the past. He has associated with criminals and very devisive people. He has said he wants change, yet during his short tenure in the Senate, he has pork-barreled to the amount of over 800 million bucks. He wants to reform everyone but himself.He has little real work experience but thinks he has all the answers for problems inter and intra-nationally. Frankly, he sounds as though he has a true “personality disorder”.

Posted by: Do Good | September 26, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

McCain looks desperate and tired, but remember McCain’s Vice President can see Russia from her backyard.

Posted by: Gregory | September 26, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

McCain is a Republican, therefore he cannot be an honest president.

Posted by: David | September 26, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

John McCain said he knows Henry Kissinger for 35 years and he would not agree to talks with out preconditions, but the TRUTH IS.. Henry Kissinger is in agreement with Meeting with other without preconditions. How come McCain can’t look Barack in the eye. never looked over to his opponent.

Posted by: Chuck | September 26, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

So What? I don’t make anywhere near that kind of money! Those people making over 200,000 should pay more!
Under Mcsame’s plan I’m not getting any favors!!!

Posted by: Sara | September 26, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

Keep in mind that Barack Obama closed by discussing what the American dream has become, while John McCain closed by saying he didn’t believe “Obama has the knowledge or experience” to run our country. Just like always, McCain wastes time attacking Obama but comes off as a bumbling, lying fool

Posted by: Walker | September 26, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Why is McCain and his group continuing to lie. As an independent and active duty military officer, I do not like the untruths. I am afraid he will lie when ever he needs it. Scary… just checked facts on alot of the issues… too many half truths.

Posted by: doc | September 26, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Well, that’s better than having a VP who makes up history with a tone as if it were the truth. Just think if Biden had to report on something really important. His story of FDR coming on the television in 1929 was hilarious! He would be quite entertaining, until he says something that risks our safety.

Posted by: Do Good | September 26, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

WELL GOOD! it’s about TIME Obama got a lesson from how McCain is running his campaign!
I was personally getting tired of the goodie-two-shoes
lol…
but seriously folks, WHAT KIND OF PERSON IS GIULIANI??? why is he doing the work for Palin?
DUDE! you got DUMPED by McCain! have some DIGNITY and tell them to go get VicePresident Barbie ooops I mean PITBULL WITH LIPSTICK to go at it! !!

Posted by: GIGI | September 26, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I thought the debate went well. Both men seemed prepared. Obama still comes off as someone who is a puppet with words and slogans. He mentioned having worked on various pieces of legislation but when you actually look at the voting record it does not support his claim. I just don’t think this is the right time for him to become President. He needs more experience and less rhetoric.

Posted by: shirley w | September 26, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

by the way, all of you making more than $250K a year… ooh me so soryy!!! me love yo long time!
lol!

Posted by: GIGI | September 26, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Posted by: BlueStarMan | September 26, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Sherly
I can see your claim, but my worry is this
McCain is nearing the life expectancy age in the United States.
SO who wold be better president?
OBAMA or PALIN (or Giuliani, not sure what that was about…)

Posted by: GIGI | September 26, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Another lie in the serial liar’s entertaining mouth.

Posted by: young_voter | September 26, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Taxes are going up whomever is elected, or are they going to keep on borrowing. As far as I am concerned I will vote for someone that didn’t cheat on a wife that was true to him I wonder what carol has to say about her ex husband, applies for a marriage license while still married to her to marry the rich trophy wife that never worked a day in her life. Dumb and dumber this country does not need more of the last 8 years sorry but I can not in good conscience vote for dumb and dumber.

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | September 26, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Kissinger did not say he favored unconditional talks…he said he favored direct talks. Big difference. I guess Barak’s ivy league liberal education did not include English

Posted by: Laura | September 26, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

So Obama gave the number for families?
… that’s it?
Weak.
.

Posted by: Grand Moff Texan | September 26, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

McCain did not give us any FACTS during his debate. He has lied about SO MANY THINGS in this campaign its unreal. Independent groups who rate commercials have said he has SIX major, outright lies in these commercials. WAKE UP people and vote for the candidate who will make the country better. …. It’s NOT McCAIN.

Posted by: Rob CC | September 26, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

So there are only 5% of Americans making over $250,000? Don’t get me wrong, that’s a lot of money, I’m just surprised at that percentage.

Posted by: leigh | September 26, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Obama won this debate hands down. We hee hawwed when Obama made the remark about McCain singing about bombing Iran.
Great job Obama – Just wish you would have asked him if he’d ever seen a war hhe didn’t like.

Posted by: Bob | September 26, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Hey, what’s with Obama’s accent when he says “Pakistan” or “Taliban”? Anybody else notice?

Posted by: leigh | September 26, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

I can’t believe these are the only two people we have to pick from for our president! Maybe Obama and McCain should get together and work on the economy issues until they come to an agreement. Just like a jury!

Posted by: Undecided | September 26, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

so he didnt state married or single. If you are making 200k+ a year u are doing better than 95% of americans

Posted by: Trevor | September 26, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

I feel McCain won the debate tonight.

Posted by: country voter | September 26, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Hey Doc did you read the headline at all??, Obama is the One telling Fibs not Mccain. Obama is a really Sly cat I give him that, and that is the reason most of you young uns cant seen through him!!.

Posted by: Aden | September 26, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

So if higher taxes start on couples making 250,000 per year why doesn’t he say that or families. In my world if a couple makes 250,000 per year that means 125,000 each doesn’t it? or 100,000 and 150,000, or even 50,000 and 200,000. So someone making 50,000 per year could see the taxes on their family go up.

Posted by: s.b. | September 26, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

David – Your an idiot. No wonder you make minimum wage.

Posted by: Bil | September 26, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

McCain is commanding in tonight’s debate; Obama, weak. McCain speaks like a President; Obama like a politician.

Posted by: young_voter | September 26, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

And yes the way he said Pakistan and Taliban was said with an accent that any American not raised muslim would not have.

Posted by: s.b. | September 26, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Michelle sure popped up in the camera fast after the handshake.

Posted by: leigh | September 26, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Come on already! All Obama said tonight is well I voted no for the war. Big friggin deal. It was wrong, it was bad, but we’re there. We need to know what is going to happen. We don’t need someone stamping his feet and pouting “but I said No”. Wake up People!!! I don’t understand why the press is in love with this guy…

Posted by: nobama | September 26, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

GIGI is a paranoid nutbag

Posted by: Darryl | September 26, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

Oh, I liked McCain saying he didn’t have his own presidential seal yet. HeeHaww

Posted by: leigh | September 26, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

The debate was all between Professor and a student or a novice.
How many did Obama say
” I agree with McCain..”
Good now Obama will vote for McCain. Its tough on him to decide anyway.
McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: vic | September 26, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

I am still waiting for Obama to put his hand over his heart when the pledge or star bangled banner is played.
Why does he refuse to do that? Whay does he stand with his hands crossed infront of him?
Country 1st or Obama 1st?

Posted by: Undeceided | September 26, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

GiGi.. did you happen to notice that Sen. McCain’s mother is 96? He’ll most likely outlive you

Posted by: nobama | September 26, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Lee:
Obama NEVER said that 95% would not pay taxes, only that they would not get an increase.
And, Jake, I think you’re splitting hairs — if not being inaccurate — on the 200,000 vs 250,000 thing.
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: jackt51 | September 26, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

You McCain supporters are on crack
Obama just defeated McCain on a debate mostly about foreign policy. All McCain can do is talk about his past involvements while Obama talks about the future.
Obama gives very clear plans for the Economy and Taxes…. I never hear any plans from McCain. He just tries and lie about Obama’s.
Obama is the person who seems under control while McCain stressed out. He seemed like he was going to blow up a few times.

Posted by: Brian | September 26, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

It is the job of the young to buck the system and the job of the mature to protect the young from their youthful folly. May John McCain protect us from Barak’s youth. I will be much more interested in hearing from Barak in about 10 years.

Posted by: Laura | September 26, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Obama will say anything.
He is a fraud

Posted by: adam | September 26, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Accent? Looks away from the flag? Can’t admit the surge is working? Muslim head gear? Associates with radicals?
Connecting the dots yet?

Posted by: XOXO | September 26, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

$250000 per year is not rich- upper middle class maybe, but certainly not rich.

Posted by: blondielasvegas | September 26, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Obama talks about 95% will cut tax cut.
out of 95%, 45% do not pay tax
only 5% Obama wants to increase tax are the employment generators.
If 5% do not generate jobs, remaining 95% will not have jobs.

Posted by: adam | September 26, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Brian, you must be a member of the press. No one besides them thinks obama won that debate. Seriously.

Posted by: nobama | September 26, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Brian – maybe its the ganja he smoked with William ayers before the event.
The hippy party always looks “cool” and sort of “spaced out”.
Don’t confuse under control with under the influence….

Posted by: Bil | September 26, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

For all you liberals who think the answer is more taxes for those whose income is over $250,000 per year, are you aware that CURRENTLY the top 2% of income earners pay HALF of all income tax proceeds, the 58% below that pay the other half, and 40% of income earners pay NONE? Is the top 2% paying HALF of all taxes not paying their “fair share?” Need to make them pay more? Say goodbye to jobs, if you have any concept of where they come from!

Posted by: WhitemoonG | September 26, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

At least McCain was born here and has served his country.

Posted by: karen | September 26, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Good grief!..what has ancient marital history got to do with current affairs?..get real or we’ll discuss Monica Lewinski in the oval office! Tonight was another instance where Obama drones on with pie-in-the-sky rhetoric and no concretes. The country is in need of someone with strong leadership experience to navigate international waters…only sheep would consider a vapid slick speaker as qualified to have his finger on the button! Wake up!

Posted by: sandy | September 26, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

The Missouri Ethics Commission loses its ethics. The Missouri Ethics Commission has gone well above the purpose of the commissions. About the Missouri Ethics Commission :
The commission receives and reviews complaints alleging violations of the conflict of interest and lobbying statutes and the campaign finance disclosure statute. After investigation of these complaints, the commission refers the complaints to the appropriate prosecuting authority or disciplinary authority along with recommendations for sanctions. The commission may also initiate judicial proceedings on its own.
The commission reviews and audits reports required by the campaign finance disclosure law, the financial interest disclosure laws and the lobbying registration and reporting laws. The commission acts as the public repository for such reports. The commission provides information and assistance to lobbyists, elected and appointed officials, employees of the state and political subdivisions and the general public.
The Missouri Ethics Commission is not above the BILL OF RIGHTS of the AMERICAN CONSTITUTION.
Bill of Rights Amendment I:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The above includes The Missouri Ethics Commission. The Missouri Ethics Commission does not observe THE BILL OF RIGHTS and The Missouri Ethics Commission talks about fairness.
Missouri returns to slavery and Obama leads the way.
http://www.kmov.com/video/index.html?nvid=285793&shu=1

Posted by: Judge | September 26, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

I believe Obama won the debate!!!!!

Posted by: undecided | September 26, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

I’m getting sick of this class envy nonsense that just because someone makes more money they should pay even higher taxes and it is not because I make a huge amount of money. I don’t. The truth is that the top 5% of earners in this country already pay over 60% of all Federal Income Taxes. The top 25% pay over 86%. The bottom 50% of earners in this country pay less than 3% of taxes. As for this idea of increasing business taxes, unless Senator Obama or any of you who support this idiocy can name for me a single, not 10, not 5, but a single industry that DOES NOT pass it’s business expenses off to their customers, tell me. If you can’t then shut up. Even a 10th grade economics class teaches you that businesses DO NOT PAY TAXES. Their cusomers do. Wake up, people! We are the customers! Do you really want to pay to put gas in your car AND pay the windfalls profit tax that Obama so naively would put on oil companies? Obama is nothing more than a manchild and he’s more than just naive. He is dangerously naive.

Posted by: MinniePearlJam | September 26, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

People of Missouri: You can file an unconstitutional lawsuit against any Missouri official that usurps the FREEDOM OF SPEECH. The Missouri ethics rule has no power to enforce any rule that is unconstitutional. Take up the fight and make those unconstitutional official pay to the tune of $20,000,000 for each enforcement of their unconstitutional rule.
Senator Obama has finally showed who he really is. The unconstitutional tactics used in Missouri are like the tactics of Hitler and the Nazi party. No where in this great United States of America should we let such unconstitutional rules stand to govern a free people. Missouri returns to slavery and Senator Obama leads the way.
http://www.kmov.com/video/index.html?nvid=285793&shu=1

Posted by: Judge | September 26, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

This is a ridiculous point.
First, to claim Obama was attempting to “mislead” anyone implies an intention to do so. There is no evidence that that was the case. Anyone who watched could see that he was quickly reiterating a standard talking point and simply neglected to distinguish between couples and individuals. His general claim that 95% of the population would get a tax cut was correct and remains correct — and, indeed, more salient.
And, yes, to Leigh, most Americans make a lot less than either $200,000 or $250,000 so there are very few people who watched the debate who could possibly vote the wrong way based on Obama’s mistake. Truly, a ridiculous point.
How about fact-checking how many Americans have died this month while we’re winning the war in Iraq?

Posted by: Ohiovoter | September 26, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Each has his flaws and greats. But honestly after close observation Sen.Obama edges Sen.McCain on more greats than flaws. When someone is confident, he knows he is standing on a solid ground. That is what Sen.Obama projected throughout the campaign and debate.

Posted by: Tsiang | September 26, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

I agree with John!!

Posted by: Kim | September 26, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

At the end of the day I would be more fearful and cautious of McCain if I were the president of some of the uncooperative or rouge nations.
Obama on the otherhand, leads me to believe he can easily be distracted with a few card tricks, some shell games and magic tricks.

Posted by: XOXO | September 26, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

McCain won this debate hands down. Obama I thought was very nieve, weak. I will definitely be voting for McCain. McCain talks specifically about issues. Obama always talk generally never ever committing himself to anything. He is flying under the radar! He is not ready to be President. McCain has earned the title.

Posted by: Margaret | September 26, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

To Doc: Did you actually BELIEVE Obama when he said he didn’t hear all the racist comments his “mentor” Wright spewed? What about the “Tony” Rezko connection & Obamas call for ethics reform in Washington? Do you believe that Obama isn’t “tight” with Bill Ayers, a terrorist in the 1970′s, who has never apologized for what he did? Key excerpts from 09-23-08 Wall Street Journal article by Stanley Kurtz:”
Despite having authored two autobiographies, Barack Obama has never written about his most important executive experience. From 1995 to 1999, he led an education foundation called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), and remained on the board until 2001. The group poured more than $100 million into the hands of community organizers and radical education activists.
The CAC’s agenda flowed from Mr. Ayers’s educational philosophy, which called for infusing students and their parents with a radical political commitment, and which downplayed achievement tests in favor of activism.
The CAC was the brainchild of Bill Ayers, a founder of the Weather Underground in the 1960s. Among other feats, Mr. Ayers and his cohorts bombed the Pentagon, and he has never expressed regret for his actions. Barack Obama’s first run for the Illinois State Senate was launched at a 1995 gathering at Mr. Ayers’s home.”
NOW, how many questionable associations does Obama have to demonstrate before you understand what his philosophy really is? He has not been forthright about any of these. And you think McCain lies and gives half-truths.LOL

Posted by: Do Good | September 26, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

A vote for Obama is a vote for radicalism. You are know by the comany you keep

Posted by: LOL | September 26, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

John McCain won this hands down.

Posted by: bill | September 26, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Do Good – Exactly! Well stated and easily verified!

Posted by: Scott | September 26, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

And yes the way he said Pakistan and Taliban was said with an accent that any American not raised muslim would not have.
Posted by: s.b. | Sep 26, 2008 11:03:20 PM
———–
well I’ll be darn… I’ve heard of geographical accents but I reckon I’ve never heard of Religious accent…
I wonder what accent Wiccans use…

Posted by: GIGI | September 26, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

I think with his knowledge of foreign affairs and the aura of experience that he projects, McCain easily won this debate. I watched tonight as an undecided but I fell fairly sure that unless something unforeseen occurs, that I will be voting for John McCain.

Posted by: Kevin | September 26, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Obama a leader on foreign policy…Yeah right.

Posted by: Doc | September 26, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

All who know about Senator Obama’s tax package would call his 250k vs. 200k comment a gaffe. Saying it isn’t true is a distortion on the fact.
Is this all you can come up with?
Let’s talk about the confusion ladden stance McCain has on alternate energy sources.
How can you be pro- alternate fuels when you won’t subsidise ethanol? It makes no sense. But you will dabble in nuclear energy and the tackle the behemoth task of safe disposal of it vs. investing heavily on a “green” crop, corn, which yields a reliable and safer fuel?
What I found most telling about this debate was the generational drift between the candidates. McCain is stuck in the past while the world has shifted around him. The foreign policy experience he professes is one of the cold war and Vietnam. His foresight on Iraq was a disaster. His references to Putin and seeing KGB in his eyes is a snapshot of where he is trapped in history. Lord knows all of his references to his time in Vietnam need to be left along the way side. He is a war hero of a past war and every time he mentions Vietnam it is a slight to the soldiers who are sacrificing life and mental health in Iraq and Afghanistan.
We need a new beginning, a fresh perspective with intellectual insight
to help us rebuild America and strengthen our stance in a truly global society. Obama fits those qualifications. He was right on the need to withdraw troops from Iraq. A few weeks ago President Bush proposed the withdrawal just like Obama pointed out prior to Bush’s announcement.
With regards to the surge we keep hearing so much about. The violence in Iraq went down, not because of the additional force we were capable of exerting but because the Sunni and Shiites on their own toned down their attacks against each other. Why? Because although they dislike each other, they dislike us even more and they want us OUT. That’s a fact– now check it!

Posted by: clarity | September 26, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Gigi – you too are an idiot

Posted by: Lil Kim | September 26, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Clearly the debate didn’t change anybody’s mind here – same old stuff. Apparently “naive” is word of the day for the Republicans, even if Palin’s recent usage (and McCain’s repetition tonight) paints their beloved Kissinger as “dangerously naive” too.
Anyone who believes buzzwords and BS from either side is dangerously naive in my opinion. If you like McCain, you’ll think he won tonight by being aggressive. If you don’t like him, he’s a cantankerous cranky old man who’s is so blinded by his own perceived greatness that he disdains the opinions of those who disagree with him. I’m thinking more the latter, myself, as he sure didn’t come across as a guy who will be bipartisan. His performance tonight reminds me of the South Carolina Republican debate in which he grimaced whenever Ron Paul said anything (even though Paul was right on in what he was saying).
So, a big whatever from me.

Posted by: MIguy | September 26, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

At least McCain was born here and has served his country.
Posted by: karen | Sep 26, 2008 11:14:30 PM
————————–
so did Kerry, did you vote for him?
I’m scared! I don’t want another Republican President…seriously! can anyone blame me?!
I feel awful for my child, this is not the country I envisioned for him.
And now Republicans want us to trust them again?

Posted by: GIGI - bottomline, you gave us BUSH | September 26, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Amongst all his mumblings, Obama did say a few interesting things.
1) Very early on he said something to the effect of it would be good for everybody to have a tax cut.
2) At least twice he said that he won’t know what to delay as far as new programs are concerned because “the economy is slowing so we won’t know what the tax revenues are.”
Both of these show the fundamentals of taxing and revenue that John Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, and the Bushes have known: that if you cut taxes, revenues go up because you actually grow the economy.
It also shows Obama’s realization that raising taxes is very bad for the economy.
So quit with the class warfare that the Dems have engaged in for decades. If it is bad, it is bad- no matter how much you earn. (And my house is worth 1/11th that of Obama’s- so you do the math and determine if I am rich or not.)

Posted by: Political Dean | September 26, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

No Clarity he doesn’t. Your just another hippy drinking the kool aid.
Rezco, Ayers, Wright, Flager, Chicago Land….Connect the dots and you might come out of your trance.
I already have my messiah. You appaers to think Obama is yours.

Posted by: Lil Kim | September 26, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Gigi – you too are an idiot
Posted by: Lil Kim | Sep 26, 2008 11:29:30 PM
““““““““““““““
and HOT! THANK GOD FOR MEN LIKE MCCAIN!

Posted by: GIGI | September 26, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

It seems that once again people on here, who purport to be Christian, feel the need to use the Lord’s name in vain. Obama has never called himself such and your mocking attribution goes against what you should have learned in Sunday school, if you ever went.

Posted by: MIguy | September 26, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Hey look everyone – The idiot MIgay is back

Posted by: XOXO | September 26, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

To WhitemoonG and MinniePearl:
Thank you for the facts. Your point is well-taken.Somehow, the liberals want to put forth an agenda that if you work hard, delay gratification by getting your education before having children, pay for your own families’existence, you should be punished by paying high taxes to pay for non-working people’s existence, and if you are very hard working and make above $100,000, you should be punished by being taxed at a greater rate, or was it $200,000 or $250,000 that Obama mentioned-it’s a moving target America. Wake up!!!

Posted by: Do Good | September 26, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

I like Bush. Not the president, the other

Posted by: bil | September 26, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Guess again, gigi… I voted for Kerry last time and Gore the time before. I happen to be an informed intelligent independent voter. I research facts and the candidates and go from there. I don’t vote by party. That’s crazy. So, no, I didn’t give you Bush and I pray that you don’t give me obama. We do need a change, but obama is so wrong on so many levels

Posted by: nobama | September 26, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

To Gigi, According to the actuarial charts McCain should live another twelve years. Looking at his 96 year old mother and what he went through in Vietnam, he apparently has pretty good genes. Why the concern with Palin, she has more practical executive experience than Obama.

Posted by: shirley w | September 26, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

AMERICANS: Senator Obama is using police tactics in the United States of America to stop FREEDOM of SPEECH. It is not the duty of The Missouri Ethics Commission to usurp the freedoms guaranteed by the BILL of Rights first amendment in the American Constitution.
How does The Missouri Ethics Commission and law enforcement guarantee that Senator Obama is telling the truth, the whole true, and nothing else but the whole truth? The Missouri Ethics Commission is saying only other people lie and use deception, not Senator Obama.
The Missouri Law must be placed under the scrutiny of the State and Federal Supreme Courts. Such unconstitutional laws must be stricken from the books.
Obama must be stop by the Attorney General for using unconstitutional methods, deception, and lies. It is evident that Missouri supports slavery and Senator Obama leads the way. It will be a horrific day in America when Americans are denied FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
http://www.kmov.com/video/index.html?nvid=285793&shu=1

Posted by: Judge | September 26, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Paying taxes is not a sin – it is what is used to pay our soldiers, pay for healthcare for the elderly, build bridges and roads and defend our freedoms. The key issue is what happens to that money once Washington gets its hands on it. I think most of us feel the money is squandered. So, instead of wasting time on ‘earmarks’, which the GAO says is an insignificant part of government spending – look into what the real spending problems are. Currently, Medicare and Social Security are the biggest concerns and the Iraq war is not far behind. And who knows about this bailout…

Posted by: MIguy | September 26, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Thanks, bil, we all needed a laugh.

Posted by: nobama | September 26, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

shirley w: while you are correct that actuarial charts show the life expectancy for a 72 year old US man to be 12 years, you are ignoring that his risk of death in the next four years is 14-16%. you are also ignoring that his previous melanomas increase this risk of death and you also ignore that he has already outlived his father and grandfather (your ‘good genes’ argument is false). if you include the risks of stroke, dementia or other mental impairment then there is a 20-25% chance McCain will be incapacitated in the next four years.
so if you like Palin, rejoice! she’s got a good chance to be president before the next election cycle if McCain wins…

Posted by: doc | September 26, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

After watching McCain tonight.
How did W ever come in the picture.
00/04 should have been ALL McCain.
Its never too late though.
McCain 08

Posted by: vic | September 26, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

McCain is the best choice for president.As an emigrant and living my American dream, I’m very proud of this country.I just don’t understand why Democrats hated America.Especially the liberal media.I cannot turn on to TV now.It made me sick!
Thank God for Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.Thank God for talk radio.GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Posted by: jell | September 26, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

I have news for folks that think Obama can raise a lot of revenue by taxing those with incomes over 250K. People with that kind of income don’t just get it from salaries like those of us under 250K. They have more ways to avoid taxes than you can imagine. Such as, deferring business income, investing in tax exempt instruments, like state bonds, or taking their business out of the country.

Posted by: shirley | September 26, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

No MIGuy, paying taxes is not a sin. However, using over 60% of the revenue taken in through taxes for overhead and administration IS a sin. If tomorrow the Cancer Association, March of Dimes or any other charity announced that they used almost 2/3 of their money taken in to run the charity and administer the money, nbody including yourself would give another dime to them. But the federal government does it year in and year out and then says “WE need more”. Hell no, they do not need more. Do you people realize that Individual Income taxes only make up about 38% of the revenue to the federal government and that amount doesn’t come close to what they lose every year? Can anyone tell me a single thing that is so important to fund, that we need to fund it with only 34 cents of every dollar that is sent to fund it? Do any of you think that is some kind of great deal?

Posted by: MinniePearlJam | September 26, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Call a lie, a lie. What happened to objective journalism? Why is ABC saying that Obama “misled” when they call John McCain a liar at the drop of a hat, or do they think that Obama is such an empty suit that he doesn’t know the details of his own policy. Note to the media–credibility is a lot like virginity…once you lose it, you don’t get it back.

Posted by: justthefacts | September 26, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

No question Mccain won this debate. Obama looked like a rookie who could only talk about the job because others had advised him on the position, while Mccain has the ability to speak from experience.

Posted by: eddie | September 26, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

its nice Mcsame agrees with binmissing on were the war should be fought

Posted by: neb | September 26, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

How come MCCain can not look Barack in the eyes……
Because McCain did not want to look at his opponent’s angry eyes.

Posted by: catleya | September 26, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

If you think 250,000 is rich that’s fine. Once I get to making that much money I will be sure to raise my prices enough to compensate myself for the extra taxes I pay and make your dollar worth less. Sorry poor folks your never going to be able get a away from paying taxes. You either pay them directly or you pay them indirectly though more expensive goods and services. It’s better to not pay them all together. Abolish the FED and the IRS. It’s time you get up off the couch stop feeling sorry for yourself because the factory shut down and learn how to do something else. The “Pursuit of Happiness” has never been a guarantee. Time to grow up.

Posted by: jomama | September 26, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Like you, I’m interested in paying my fair share of taxes and not a penny more. I don’t like it either. Everybody blames government, but the problem is us (because we ultimately are the government). Congress has terrible approval ratings, but we all keep electing our own legislator.
No, I’m not smart enough to fix all of government. And I certainly don’t think either party can do it. Do you?

Posted by: MIguy | September 26, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Can anyone tell me why the press – ABC in particular at this moment – keep saying obama won the debate?? I don’t understand why they like this guy so much. Seriously, help me understand, please…

Posted by: confused | September 26, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

That Damn Obama!!!!!!!!!
Now those folks will have to settle for a Mercedes instead of a Rolls Royce
Oh nooooo…. they may have to fly economy now.

Posted by: Omentum | September 26, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

All the idiots who post here…..How many of you make between 200 and 250k a year where this story matters?

Posted by: Tree | September 26, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Spending Freeze really????? So Mcain is telling us he will cut off spending for us, but bailout the millionaires. Come on people, Mcain is not for the regular joe. That just proved it. By the way ear marks only made up 2 percent of the deficet. Thats not the problem 10 billion a month is!!!!

Posted by: yes obama | September 26, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Why is this a surprise? Besides spending days memorizing his answers, Obambi looked weak on National security and condescending in a way. McCain came through as genuine, knowledgeable and in command.
This is the kind of leader I want! Of course liberal news outlets such as CBS and CNN have their pro Obama polls out showing he won the debate- fox his own showing McCain blowing Obambi out of the water!
I guess we’ll see in the next few days how the poll move!

Posted by: IT IS THE ONLY WAY | September 26, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

@confused: I think it’s better to say that neither lost the debate. Both had good points and both looked Presidential.
If you, however, believe that McCain has been erratic, angry, and panicking lately – you would Obama “won”. If you feel Obama is naive and inexperienced, then McCain “won”.
Pick your poison…

Posted by: MIguy | September 26, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

McCain Double Speaks – He is for low taxes but going to make my employer’s health benefits taxable income and give me Swiss cheese in a tax credit? Tax is a tax is a tax. He just does not get it.

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | September 26, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Just a few comments.
First to Rosey, right after the debate ended George and Diane were reviewing the statement from Henry Kissinger, and they said on national TV that Henry Kissinger did indeed say that. They actually read the quaote. So Barack Obama was correct.
Secondly, if you think Barack is a liar check out McCains records. And why doesn;t anyone mention the Keating Five scandal?

Posted by: Susan | September 26, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

I’m not sure but I would think an expert on the “deficet” would probably know the proper spelling.

Posted by: MinniePearlJam | September 26, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

The $250,000 level is insignificant as far as the tax increase. It really starts to hurt at $600,000.
The capital gains tax isn’t a big deal because Obama either won’t get it through Congress, or it will be phased in. And, there are other ways to make money.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Posted by: s.b.
I’m probably voting for McCain, but your comment is really uninformed. The “a” in Pakistan and Taliban is not pronounced with a hard “a” like in “apple,” overseas in the east. The English language doesn’t have the sound “a” (soft a like in ahhhh). All Obama is doing is pronouncing these names in the way people from those countries would pronounce it.

Posted by: bluebird | September 27, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

SEND OBAMA BACK TO KENYA WHERE HE WAS BORN. Obama may be deported !!!
Obama and the DNC are fighting the lawsuit against Obama and his false citizenship. This is an active lawsuit in the Federal court system. He is actually a citzen of Kenya and Indonesia.
http://www.obamacrimes.com

Posted by: Akitisha | September 27, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

I thought they were both good. Obama was good, seemed a little irritated and miffed at times. Lots of sighing. McCain was good too, even funny, light, but serious. Obama was way too serious at times, but I thought he should be given his inexperience…he wouldn’t ahve come across well joking about anything. Very very tough. I think I’ll probably vote McCain, but I did like Obama tonight…far more than at any other time during this election campaing.

Posted by: bluebird | September 27, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Obama:
freshman senator, experienced liar !

Posted by: Alan | September 27, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Umm, $200K is close to $250K. McCain didn’t mention the middle class once during the election. Did you hear it? Barack one this hands down. McCain wants to fight fight fight. Cut spending? How do you cut spending while spending money in war while our economy suffers.

Posted by: zuq | September 27, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

This debate reminded me of the time the youngin’ Robin Ventura charged the mound that Grandpa Nolan Ryan was occupying. Ryan buzzed Ventura with a fastball and Ventura didn’t take too kindly to it.
Remember what happened? Grandpa Ryan whooped his a@@!

Posted by: Scooter | September 27, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Most of you are still wearing the republican blinders. I guess ya’ll just havent learned from the last 8 years. Good grief, its obvious Obama won this debate tonight…..

Posted by: sruth | September 27, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

McCain won the debate. Obama was clearly nervous and flustered. Several times Obama couldn’t even remember McCain’s first name, calling McCain, Jim. That is pretty bad to not even get McCain’s first name right.

Posted by: Doreen | September 27, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

This debate clearly was a wash. In both national and local coverage the it was a win for the candidate the person supported.
I had laughed out loud when I saw a big Obama Wins! screen. I wonder what the leanings are for the former Democratic White House communications director George Stephanopolis are?

Posted by: Remember1990s | September 27, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

This debate clearly was a wash. In both national and local coverage the it was a win for the candidate the person supported.
I had laughed out loud when I saw a big Obama Wins! screen. I wonder what the leanings are for the former Democratic White House communications director George Stephanopolis are?

Posted by: Remember1990s | September 27, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Scooter Grandpa Ryan was a young 40 something. A little different from McCain’s 72.

Posted by: Jim Bob | September 27, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Obama: call me if you need me. Don’t hold you breath!
Obama used the term “present” when voting, now he doesn’t show up. The country is better off…

Posted by: Abe in FL | September 27, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Has it dawned on any of you that both campaigns have lied, told half truths, and been vague about reality. It’s all about getting elected and saying just enough to get the independent vote. We are so polarized in this country that elections don’t come down to Democrats and Republicans. They come down to those independents that really look at the issues and think outside party ties. Honestly, both candidates haven’t layed out distinctly how they would fix the economy and we all now know that it’s all about the ECONOMY!

Posted by: Marshall | September 27, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

MCCAIN kicked Barry’s BUTT back to kenya where he belongs!!!!!
It was great- bye bye YOBAMA

Posted by: marci | September 27, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

To quote David, “Good! If you are a couple making that much money, you’re rich. Works for me!”
Well david, if you’re making $50k per year, you might not feel rich, but I bet you someone making $25K per year thinks that you are. He might even want to get his hands on your hard earned money! But I bet you won’t give it to him. Why is ok to take from people making $250k? They’ve earned just like you’ve earned whatever you’ve got. If you want more, work harder.

Posted by: Mike H. | September 27, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

to GIGI: I don’t understand your comments. Are you old enough to remember when Jimmie Carter,a Democrat, pretended to be the president? If you were an adult then, you are probably aware that home mortgages were any where between 13-20%. Do you have any idea how hard it was for a middle-class family to have bought a home and a car to get to work with rates like that?Surely you remember that Carter let in a huge number of “refugees” from Cuba who were actually criminals that Castro didn’t want.Bill Clinton,for whatever reason, did nothing after the Cole was bombed, and did not give the order to shoot Bin Laden when the CIA had B L in their scope. And you are afraid of a Republican president?

Posted by: Do Good | September 27, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

The debate cemented my vote for John McCain…..please please see the light people…wake up before it is too late. Obama is a socialist….Lets not go there.

Posted by: linda | September 27, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

who said McCain is educated? are u kidding me? did McCain even go to college?

Posted by: Reid | September 27, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It’s insane…abc and all the news media keeps insisting their boy won…when in fact, we all saw for OURSELVES that he LOST big time, that he was a stuttering clueless nitwit that kept trying to talk over McCain.
McCain had him on foreign policy, the war, fiscal responsibility…everything!
McCain 1
Barry 0

Posted by: ken | September 27, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

How come the Georgia statement was not checked. Heres the check:
Obama’s campaign released the following statement on the situation:
“I strongly condemn the outbreak of violence in Georgia, and urge an immediate end to armed conflict. Now is the time for Georgia and Russia to show restraint, and to avoid an escalation to full scale war.”
McCain:
McCain spoke with reporters on the tarmac to discuss the current situation in Georgia. He called for the U.S. to immediately convene an emergency meeting of the U.N. Security Council and to work with the EU and NATO to create a neutral peacekeeping force to ensure Georgia’s security.
Posted: Friday, August 08, 2008 11:29 AM
Looks like McCain was correct. Obama did say, in effect, Georgia shouldn’t protect herself. But then again, Obama said he didn’t say that. McCain wanted to ensure Georgia’s security.

Posted by: Jim | September 27, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“You McCain supporters are on crack”
I THINK YOU’RE REFERRING TO BARRY..THE LOW LIFE CRACK SMOKING KENYAN!

Posted by: TIRED OF THIS $H!T | September 27, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Obama won the debate the trolls are in full spin mode.

Posted by: KQuark | September 27, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

SEND OBAMA BACK TO KENYA WHERE HE WAS BORN. Obama may be deported !!!
Obama and the DNC are fighting the lawsuit against Obama and his false citizenship. This is an active lawsuit in the Federal court system. He is actually a citzen of Kenya and Indonesia.
http://www.obamacrimes.com
Posted by: Akitisha | Sep 27, 2008 12:02:31 AM
———————————-
This is unreal!!! I hope the judge puts Obama and Howard Dean in Jail! Obama is just like Resko, another scam artist!
This is a real lawsuit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Bruce | September 27, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

And by the way, all this “chatter” on all these posts about how McCain couldn’t look Barry in the eye..and all they took from that…for your information, that is just McCain’s
‘MO”…that is how he operates – if you’ve ever watched him in any other debates, he chooses not to give much eye contact to his opponent – especially those who TICK HIM OFF…I think its his way of keeping calm and not wanting to go over there and slap him upside the head! He stayed calm tonight despite Barry trying to ‘goad” him on. But just for the record, that is just what he does with EVERYONE…not just poor little OBAMA

Posted by: ken | September 27, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Do Good…I remember it well. I was able to pick up parcels of land for cash at low prices because interest rates were over 20%. No one could afford the high interest rates. People that held cash made money. McCain for PRESIDENT of the USA.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Say what you will about Obama, but it sure seems that McCain has been erratic and he has a penchant to panic. I think Obama was trying to stay cool to accentuate that difference. Whether that works and plays to voters is anyone’s guess, but I guess I just don’t buy McCain’s argument that “everybody knows me” and ergo you should just vote for me because I deserve it.

Posted by: MIguy | September 27, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Senator MCCain is the WINNER! As usual ABC shows its bias towards Obama. Obama is all smoke and mirrors and no substance. George Obamanopolis of ABC news wants to be Press Secretary for Obama so bad that he will say anything to get Obama elected. It’s not going to work!

Posted by: Bob | September 27, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

The debate looked like Michael Dukakis, take two. One for the gipper.

Posted by: Bret | September 27, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

THE DEBATE YOU JUST SAW WAS PROOF THAT THERE ISN’T A RECORD FOR OBAMA TO REFERENCE… CAUSE HE CAN’T , CAUSE THERE ISN’T ONE. VERY POOR ARGUMENT TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY.
MCCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: David | September 27, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Obama stated eight times, McCain was correct. Well, we know that!

Posted by: cindy L. | September 27, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

How about fact checking all of those ads McCain ran saying that Obama will raise taxes on everyone making over $40k per year? Here is an excellent comparison of the actual tax policies of McCain and Obama — basically, McCain gives all of the money to the extremely rich (those making over a million per year) and nothing to the poor, while Obama does the opposite. So Obama’s plan is better for 99% of people, not to mention our country’s fiscal health:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/story/2008/06/09/ST2008060900950.html

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

McCain won the debate the liberal trolls are in full spin mode.

Posted by: Appalachian Springs | September 27, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

http://www.bsf4o.com
http://www.bsf4o.com/
Who are Blue Star Families for Obama?
We represent all branches of the armed services.
We come from small towns, and the big city lights. We are wives, husbands, mothers and fathers. We are daughters, sons, and the entire extended family that gives support during deployments. Our backgrounds may be diverse, but we are united in the cause of service to our country.
We are the Military Family. And at the end of the day, there is often an empty seat at our kitchen table because our loved ones are serving far from home.
Promote our Pro-Military, Pro-Obama message.
Make a difference! Let America know that you want Barack Obama to be the next Commander in Chief!

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Obama portrayed himself with more dignity and respect than McCain did; McCain couldn’t look at Obama to talk. McCain cares more about corporations than the individual people. He tried to bail out of the debate; what would he do in the president’s position? If I could make $250,000/yr., I don’t even clear $18,000/yr., support 2 kids, mortgage, car, and much medical bills.

Posted by: Linda | September 27, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

To Susan, posting at 11:58:11:
I bet you know that McCain was found to have no connection with the “Keating Five” but the Democrats in charge of the investigation would not let him be released, a very, very ugly political ploy. So for you to bring that up as a stain on McCain makes me think that you, like Obama and the Clintons, like to misconstrue (in polite terms, aka “lie”)the truth.SHAME, SHAME, SHAME

Posted by: Do Good | September 27, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

How can McCain claim to be for more regulation to fix the economy, when for his entire career he has supported deregulation?
Conservative Republicans always want the government to stay out of business and avoid regulation as long as they are making lots of money. When their greed, however, gets them into a fix, they are the first to cry out for rules and laws and taxpayer money to bail out their businesses
Taxpayers didn’t get to enjoy any of the big money profits on the phony financial instruments like derivatives or bundled sub-prime paper, but we get the privilege of paying for their debt and failures.

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Hey Doc. Wow – you sound like McCain will be lucky to live until Jan 20th when he’s sworn in. Do you honestly believe the GOP would let someone get this far in the election if your projection for his future health were on target? I would rejoice if McCain/Palin win. I believe a woman who has her experience as Mayor and Governor offers more hope than the ‘packaged mystery man – Obama’ and the ‘more of the same Congressman- Biden. Palin is bright and decisive.

Posted by: Shirley W | September 27, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

For some reason, Obama keeps pushing this “pie in the sky” plan for taxes and spending that simply has no chance of working…period.
Raising the taxes of business and the wealthy will only serve to get the cost passed on to the consumer in HIGHER PRICES!
Businesses that cannot make money will either go out of business or get shipped overseas, and taxing business at a higher rate will only serve to make the situation worse.
No rocket science there. The wealthy and businesses do not pay for added expense. They simply pass the cost on to the working class consumer in the form of higher prices.
The only realistic way to take care of the economic mess is to start by cutting spending on government programs across the board and freeze new spending indefinitely. Then, taxes have to be raised across the board to pay off the debt and interest.
Simple. Spend less and take in more.
But, Obama and the Bots just don’t seem to get it.
Anybody But Obama/Biden…

Posted by: Jayhawk | September 27, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Seriously people, OBAMA won this debate. Mccain was like a robot, afraid to look Obama in the face. Obama a puppet?…. NEVER. I truly can’t believe that some people feel Obama was weak tonight… did you listen to the man OR, where you blinded by color? Obama has Americas best ineterest, he can and will make a great President. Honestly look at the position Bush has placed this country in, do we really want to continue down the same path?

Posted by: mokiemo | September 27, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Well George and Diane can say what they think, but FOX News just reported Kissinger said Obama misinterpreted his remarks. So, sounds like he thinks McCain was correct.
But, I’m sure that was just one of the many from both sides that was mis-stated from the original source.

Posted by: blondielasvegas | September 27, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

If I was an independent I’d be looking hard at Obama. He sounded great tonight. And he didn’t do anything to appear weak. I don’t care what the hardcore repubs think. They are as McCain as the libs are Obama. I just hope the independents and undecided realize that 8 years is enough of the repub bs.

Posted by: Obama Rules | September 27, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I think Sen. Obama should have clarified the point about income taxes, but overall he did great. I was waiting for McSame to “suspend” the debate.

Posted by: Bethany Donovan | September 27, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

We must thank the internet comment section otherwise, with all the media spin you think Obama won.
i think the cat 5 on financial world must hit the media too. SO we have new faces in. and Pls no Bailout for the Media.
McCain 08
McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: vic | September 27, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

OBAMA DIDN’T LOOK PRESIDENTIAL. HE HAD A FLUSTERED LOOK IN HIS FACE FROM START TO FINISH. HE SEEMED MUCH MORE DEFENSIVE AND JUST DIDN’T HAVE THE CALM COOL COMMANDING PRESENCE OF MCCAIN.

Posted by: Amy | September 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

As I read comments, I cant fail but realize that you people are poor and not because you dont work hard, but you all are just plain DUMB. Who else would vote agains their own interest? Don’t worry, with the way things are, those terrorists wont dare attack us. After all, who would want to attack homeless, jobless bunch of idiots. Bring on McCain and most of you wont even have a job next year and a house soon after than.
Good Luck America… you will need it, and yea call me stupid, moron, whatever you want. I am sure you will remember my words next yr.

Posted by: Jimmy | September 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Tonight, I saw a man, Obama, haunted by his past statements, said during his candidacy in order gain favor with the Left. I also saw few if any details from Obama on any of the topics covered. In fact, he seems to learned little in his time in Congress, as when he alluded that President Bush made the budget. Doesn’t he know that Congress sets the budget and the President can only veto it? And how can he reform government when he got more than $900M in earmarks for his district? It seems he’s part of the problem and not the solution.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

It’s funny how MSNBC has Obama winning the debate with about 75% and Fox News has McCain winning by that same percentage. I guess like this message board, you see the winner depending on who you are going to vote for- not msny open-minded viewers!

Posted by: blondielasvegas | September 27, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

McCain is Against the GI bill
I wonder how it made everyone feel when they found out that McCain voted against the GI Bill. He said if military servicemembers got an education they wouldn’t want to serve in the military, so he denied it. Isn’t that wonderful?
McCain Says One Thing and THEN Votes The Opposite! When you hear McCain talk, think — Wizard of Oz.

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Hi Michael Genious,
President SENDS the budget to congress, that congress votes on before it goes to president to sign.
Think before you speak, or is it too much to ask!

Posted by: Jimmy | September 27, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Linda, posting at 12:28:05
Why do you make $18,000? Did you graduate from high school? Did you go to community college to learn a trade? Can you become a cosmetician, licensed practical nurse, plumber, mechanic? When did you have the children? Should people who aren’t related to you have to work to help you with your living arrangements, and perhaps do without what they think they need because they pay taxes to subsidize your living arrangements. I don’t mean to be unkind, but truly, why do others owe you more than you owe yourself and your children?Should people who did without early in their lives to train/work long years and who thus earn large wages honestly HAVE to give to those that did not? If the answer is “yes”, from what did this assumption come?

Posted by: Do Good | September 27, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Hey Amy:
Calm Cool presence of McCain? The guy was plain old mean and tired. What did you watch?

Posted by: Jimmy | September 27, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Obama won this debate. He proved tonight that he is passionate about this country and the american people. I wish people would stop talking about him as if he isn’t an established man. He is very well educated, he relates to the human race and is just. He is sitting in the same position as mccain in congress, not under mccain, not over him BUT ON THE SAME LEVEL!!! NOTE: yes, experience is a plus but not always is the best person for the job the most experienced…

Posted by: shawncarter | September 27, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

I really dont see how Obama wins this debate…all the liberal netwks are gawking about Obama and it is making me throw up…
Clearly McCain has the vast knowledge in foreign policy and is ready to be
commander-in- chief in day one….Obama is just spewing hot air as usual. What a fraud…

Posted by: rick | September 27, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

jjpglobal, you just lambasted the wrong guy; yeah, you must be a McCain backer… CONFUSED.

Posted by: LOL | September 27, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

McSame will almost certainly carry on with Bush’s agenda. That’s the point that Barack Obama was making…and sucessfully I might ad. If our country doesn’t come together and prioritize energy independence, education, healthcare as well as actually going after the terrorists with our allies at our side, then we will continue to fall. Come on, Republicans….I used to love Bush Sr. I went to a rally as a teenager with a BUSH/QUALE sign and some wacky hippie threatened to physically attacked me. I get Republicans…I was regitered as a Republican until 4 years ago…even though I voted as a Democrat in ’96′, ’00, and ’04. I just want a lot of Republicans to wake up. Barack Obama is sincerely devoted to the working class. He’s on your side…unless you’re filthy rich. You guys have to get it. Wake up, Republicans…Obama’s your man.

Posted by: Bethany Donovan | September 27, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Well, when Mcain was asked if he were in favor of the $700 billion dollar plan on the table he said that he was in agreement with it. Did you hear that or were your ears turned towards your posteriors.
Anne

Posted by: Anne Bank | September 27, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Why is ABC News not fact-checking McCain’s false claims about Obama?? Why is it that the moment the Democratic ticket gets a little out of line they are slammed…but McCain’s camp got SUCH an early and long free ride in ridiculous false ads without anyone saying ANYTHING?

Posted by: Bhinish | September 27, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

I SENT THIS LETTER TO MY REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS:
We demand that Congress stops adding earmarks and pork within the contents of the “Bail Out Bill”. In addition we do not want a payout to ACORN — or any organization like ACORN.
We feel this is an egregious abuse of House and the Senate positions in Congress. Enough is enough.
We will no longer continue to vote or support any Representative or Senator who votes for bills with earmarks and pork or allots money to ACORN.
I BELIEVE THE PEOPLE WHO WALKED AWAY WITH TONS OF MONEY SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BAIL OUT.
If the government agrees to pay off mortgages for people who bought homes they could not afford — then the government needs to pay off ALL mortgages for ALL legal American citizens.
I don’t want my tax payments used to pay off somebody else’s home!
I PERSONALLY AM AGAINST A WALL STREET BAILOUT BUT AT LEAST FORKING OVER A THIRD OF THE MONEY — WITH THE REST CONTINGENT ON EFFECTIVENESS — MAKES SENSE.
I AM TOTALLY AGAINST GIVING 10% TO ORGANIZATIONS LIKE “ACORN”. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BUY HOMES THEY CAN’T AFFORD. DO NOT BAIL THEM OUT.
NORTH CAROLINA TAXPAYER

Posted by: HONORABLE JOHN McCAIN IN 2008 | September 27, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Forget the debate, it does not matter who won.
AMERICANS: Senator Obama is using police tactics in the United States of America to stop FREEDOM of SPEECH. It is not the duty of The Missouri Ethics Commission to usurp the freedoms guaranteed by the BILL of Rights first amendment in the American Constitution.
How does The Missouri Ethics Commission and law enforcement guarantee that Senator Obama is telling the truth, the whole true, and nothing else but the whole truth? The Missouri Ethics Commission is saying only other people lie and use deception, not Senator Obama.
The Missouri Law must be placed under the scrutiny of the State and Federal Supreme Courts. Such unconstitutional laws must be stricken from the books.
Obama must be stop by the Attorney General for using unconstitutional methods, deception, and lies. It is evident that Missouri supports slavery and Senator Obama leads the way. It will be a horrific day in America when Americans are denied FREEDOM OF SPEECH.
http://www.kmov.com/video/index.html?nvid=285793&shu=1

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Mccain was not born in the U.S.Send Mccain back to Panama, Is there where he was born?

Posted by: Reena | September 27, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Mccain was not born in the U.S.Send Mccain back to Panama, Is there where he was born?

Posted by: Reena | September 27, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Those who think that McCain was the winner clearly is just as delusional as John McCain. I am so sick of hearing about the surge and how it is responsible for a calmer Iraq…well I’ve got news, the surge only counts as a small part of why the violence has lessened in Iraq and McCain is his desire to be a war hero should stop trying to play on American pride by associating a withdrawal from Iraq as defeat. This is a war that was fabricated and the American people were deceived by the ole boy network in DC which so happen to be a network that John McCain is a part of. If you want to fix the current economic issues that is raping the common folks of America, then let’s end the biggest John McCain supported pork barrel spending in history which happens the $ 10 Billion per month or $5K per second occupation of Iraq. Just think what those Billions would do to correct the energy, job, housing, and banking crisis that is tearing this great nation apart. It’s time for change and Senator Obama and Biden will bring the change and security not to mention the respect around the world that we once had. Clearly senator Obama was the winner and very presidential.
King from Queens, NY

Posted by: Devin | September 27, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

I have seen many debates and I have never seen one Candidate like McCain that was so rude that he couldn’t look the other in the eye.They were both told to look at one another as if they are talking to one another.That old saying don’t trust anyone that can’t look you in the eye when talking to you because they have something to hide is a prime example of McCain tonight with Obama.McCain lost to Bush when he was running for President in 2000 with his own party and I can understand why.He is not President Material.Obama stands up for himself and is calm.That is what American needs as a President to be able to talk to other World Leaders like John Kennedy did and he cares about straightening our Country out

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

The couple who own the little store on the corner see a tax increase. Do you think they’ll cancel their trip to Europe? Nope, they just raise their prices enough to cover it. Their suppliers all get a tax increase too, they pass it on. You and I pay more for the things we buy to cover the extra tax imposed on “the rich”. Taxing the rich has always sounded good and it buys a lot of votes but in the end it’s just an indirect sales tax. Obama taxes the rich but you and I pay the bill. Cutting government spending makes more sense.

Posted by: Oonogil | September 27, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Obama is a joke!McCain was very Presidential tonight. Obama was struggling without his teleprompter.

Posted by: Tami | September 27, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

shirley w: you seemed to like the actuarial tables when it supported your argument, what’s changed? you don’t have to like what i wrote but the odds are the odds.
it is not up to me who the GOP picks and, honestly, my guess is the party elders didn’t really want McCain.
as for your support of Palin, that is your business and i have heard more than one woman state, as you imply, that you wouldn’t mind seeing McCain pass away leaving the reins to Palin. i’m not sure that the majority of the country agrees with you.

Posted by: doc | September 27, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

I am Libertarian so I watched with out bias! McCain always showed respect to Obama by calling him Senator Obama. He was clear and had the facts together and made a convincing speaker. Obama often couldn’t remember McCain’s name and called him Bob and Jim a few times and never showed the respect of calling him Senator McCain. He stuttered and became flustered when McCain mentioned the 800 million in Obama’s earmarks. McCain is clearly the better of the two, but for the sake of America vote Libertarian!

Posted by: Libertarian Robin Marks | September 27, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Obama’s planned business tax will increase costs of goods and services proportionately. How is that not a new tax on every person in the U.S. ?

Posted by: HawkTheSlayer | September 27, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

I see a lot of criticism that McCain didn’t look at Obama. Is that the best you can come up with? If die hard Democrat supporters of left wing Obama can’t come up with anything better than McCain looked the wrong way, then he clearly won the debate. No wonder Obama supporters resort to insults and name calling rather than rational discussion.

Posted by: Oonogil | September 27, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Capital gains will go back to the tax rate of the 90′s. He will let the bush tax cuts expire.
Do do some home work.
Obama website.
What a bunch of retarts, sorry republicans, in this blog.

Posted by: GLT21 | September 27, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

The result are in..OBAMA 1 McCain ZERO!
According to CBS News / Knowledge Networks’ poll of undecided voters:
40% of uncommitted voters who watched the debate tonight thought Barack Obama was the winner. 22% thought John McCain won. 38% saw it as a draw. 68% of these voters think Obama would make the right decision about the economy. 41% think McCain would.
49% of these voters think Obama would make the right decisions about Iraq. 55% think McCain would.
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/2008/09/27/Early_polls_call_Obama_winner_of_debate/UPI-45301222489321/
OXFORD, Miss., Sept. 27 (UPI) — Early polls pegged Democrat Barrack Obama as the winner over Republican John McCain in Friday’s U.S. presidential debate in Oxford, Miss.
A CBS poll of uncommitted voters found 40 percent saying Obama came out on top in the debate, compared to 25 percent for McCain. Thirty-six percent called it a draw. McCain was considered the better candidate in terms of running the war in Iraq, but Obama was selected as the best manager of the economy. The poll had a margin for error of 4 percent. CNN ran an unscientific online poll that drew more than 80,500 votes, 67 percent of which went to Obama compared to 28 percent for McCain. A similar NBC survey drew more than 291,000 clicks and gave Obama the win with 51 percent compared to 35 percent for McCain, while 7.8 percent said they weren’t sure and 6.3 percent called it a draw.

Posted by: clarity | September 27, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

Jimmie: The House and the Senate right now have Democrats in the majority. If the Democrats are so bright, why did this financial mess occur? It could be because, probably starting w/Carter, escalating w/Clinton, banks were heavily pressured to provide loans to many people who did not earn an income,i.e., they were on welfare, or they were not good credit risks due to their lack of job skills, thus they did not earn a steady wage. Additionally, you Democrat fans may be UNPLEASANTLY suprised to learn that Chris Dodd, CHAIR of the Senate Banking, Housing & Urban Affairs Committee, received the highest “contributions” (aka “bribes”) from financial, insurance & real estate industries, something like $13+million. So before you imply that ONLY Republicans are greedy, Judith, you might check your facts. The whole “campaign donations” idea needs reform, which is what McCain has tried to do for years. Why do all Americans “deserve” home ownership? Is that in the Constitution? Is that a God-given right? I don’t think so friends.

Posted by: Do Good | September 27, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Libertarian Robin Marks
If I thought a Libertarian had a chance of winning I would vote for him. Unfortunately a libertarian vote will only split the Republicans and put Obama in the White House.
Your assessment of the debate is correct.

Posted by: Oonogil | September 27, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Is there any question that McCain is more likely to get us in more wars? And which ones now? Iran? Russia?
We have unfinished business with Al-Qaeda and they are not in Iraq, Iran or Russia.
By the way, McCain never said what “winning” or “victory” in Iraq actually meant. There is no doubt that he wants bases along Iran’s border, which will only serve to continually irritate the factions there.
As for the “surge” working – what has worked is paying the Sunnis and the price of oil going up astronomically, generating tons of money for the Iraqis at our expense.

Posted by: MIguy | September 27, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

One should vote for whom they believe to be the best candidate. It becomes a fate accompli to ignore the 3rd party candidates by saying they can’t win. A good showing by a 3rd party candidate sometimes reminds the major parties where the true feelings of many Americans resides.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

All you idiots saying you make that much you should pay more dont realize that the people making that money are probably small business owners and employ 70% of all american. I got news for you Lee and friend, if they make less money you will make less money or not have a job at all. Truth hurts. The democrats have always done such a great job dividing people by how much money they make everyone forgets the real issues. Republican hide behind the bible and democrats try and divide everyone by class. It all stinks.

Posted by: Pete | September 27, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

I think you’re right, Pete. If there was one point that I agreed with Obama on was that the cost of healthcare is strangling businesses. I think this will cease to be a benefit provided by most businesses in the next five years.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Hey Jimmy Genius,
Go back to your HS books, if you ever finished. The president makes a request budget to Congress, the congress then disects the request and creates a budget resolution consisting of mandatory and discretionary spending. This resolution, representing the agreement within both chambers of Congress, is where Congress puts in most of their hanky panky. The result is almost always an inflated version of the President’s request. The President, lacking a line item veto, can then only sign or not sign the budget. Hence, he has no real control about what Congress puts in the budget request, or what they take out. So, ask yourself genius, just who really makes the budget?

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Geez, Americans aren’t that dumb. We all know the polls are biased based on the network that showcases them. FOX NEWS GOT IT RIGHT WITH MCCAIN 82% NOBAMA 16%

Posted by: David | September 27, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Keep in mind, most of those families that make over $200K are probably your small business owners. The last thing that they need in this economy is more financial distress. Those taxes will get passed down to those who can’t afford it in this economy. Don’t kid yourself about who will suffer from the “Rich” paying more taxes. It will only make the poor poorer, and then they will think the need the DEMS more. What a cycle.
Look at what the DEMS have done in MI, OH, and to our economy since they one the house majority.
Obama will be the end of this country as we know it.

Posted by: JT | September 27, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

McCain keeps saying the same old,same old about his 40 yrs ago pow days and then he brought up again about the bracelet from a woman that gave it to him.He never mention her name and of course never had it on.I don’t believe a word he says.At least Obama had a bracelet on and he did mention the name of the person that gave him the bracelet.All the lies McCain throws around and when he’s caught he still looks at the person who caught him and he still lies.Just like he did when he disrespected his own party leding them on saying 1 of 3 will be his VP and then he pulled Palin out of a hat.Not one time did he ever mention 4 for VP.
She was not vetted.She’s kept away from reporters and I can understand why when she gave 2 different interviews and screwed them up.Palin stretches her stories and McCain goes along with it.
Anything for a vote.That lux jet was nothing but a jet that was also used to transport jail birds from one area to another.These two are like ones that tell fishing tales telling ones a 20″ fish when it’s really a 5″.Palin is not VP material and McCain lost his in 2000
running against Bush for Candidate for their Party.McCain even lied to David Letterman when he was to go on his show saying he Needed to catch the plane to get back to DC and here Letterman showed McCain on Katie’s show the same time he was to go on hers.

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

What flawed analysis, Obama was talking about income tax, which you concur with on your site…he didn’t get into specifics about capital gains taxes…I think you need to fact check yourself.

Posted by: Matt MC | September 27, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Hey David,
Check your facts about Kisenger. Kisenger called Obama out tonight and DID say Obama lied and McCain was right.

Posted by: Sam | September 27, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Dear, dear Clarity: Are you so naive that you do not know that the major networks have been craming Obama down the throats of U.S. citizens? You are quoting those entities which are all for big government because they make so much money, they don’t think their lifestyle will be affected by big social programs that are referred to “entitlement” programs,paid at the expense of the middle class,both parents college-educated,working and earning less than 4150,000 Note: entitlement programs are incentives for the status quo: keep poor people poor, tell them it’s not their fault, and give them the vote to elect those who tell them their poverty isn’t their fault…Don’t you get it? Who is not protesting the black society’s tolerance of impregnating young black women, so that they don’t finish high school or get job skills, and they have children without fathers in the home? Who doesn’t want their plight to change? We have seen 50 yrs. of Medicaid,Head Start, Acorn,& the like; we have a growing population of poor,and typically it isn’t the immigrants who come, having limited English skills. No, it’s our own citizens, generations of them, even with all the subsidies/entitlement programs for food, housing, diapers and education.The Democrats want a large poor population that they can appear to “take care of” instead helping people have self-actualization. That means directing and controlling their own lives. Entitlements are another way politicians “buy” votes. Obama isn’t the savior; he’s the giver of gifts, at middle class expense. Please note his & Michelle’s charitable donation amount & the value of his IL home.

Posted by: Do Good | September 27, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

THE DEBATE WAS CONFIRMATION FOR ME THAT OBAMA IS JUST NOT PRESIDENTIAL MATERIAL. SENATOR? YES. BUT NOT A PRESIDENT.

Posted by: Amy | September 27, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

The Democrats ruined the economy in two years since getting a bare majority in Congress? Yeah, right… I forgot the 8 years of Bush/Cheney idiocy and 6 years of Republican rule in Congress.
As for what the Democrats have done in Michigan, I would certainly vote against Governor Granholm if she were running for President. She is not. What has hurt us here is the price of oil and the lack of foresight by the auto industry and the lack of any sense of urgency by the Bush administration to help the auto industry. He wouldn’t even meet with the auto execs.
All I’ve kept hearing is tough it up, Michigan and car companies. You need to be more competitive. And now the financials are failing and they get bailed out? How about they tough it up too? And you guys can be told to stop whining when you get a taste of recession too…

Posted by: MIguy | September 27, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

I like the borderline racist comments that have no place in any civilized discussion.
I also like that McCain’s people thought Obama forgot McCain’s name several times saying Jim……
THE MODERATOR WAS NAMED JIM YOU IDIOTS!
I mean, c’mon.
Almost all reviews and polls lean obama. Even if McCain was running ads and had on his website this morning that he had won even though unless he can time travel the debate hadn’t even happened yet, this was a good showing for Obama.

Posted by: Iowa grant | September 27, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

I am self employed and know the pain already of letting people go, people that have worked for me for years that are like family. It is already hard enough to run a business that makes money. Taxing the so called rich always sounds good but the consequences are very real to the families that will lose their jobs over it. In the last 5 years I have went from paying $440 a month for my insurance to cover my whole family to paying just under $1000 a month. The coverage has gotten worse, the co-pay is also up 400%. If cost continue to rise small business’s like mine will go away. Talk to any economist or accountant and you will see how bad Obama will be for the economy. That is not a republican talking those are facts. I have voted democrat in the 90′s and the last election for obvious reason, and as much as Palin scares the crap out of me, I dont think I can vote for Obama.

Posted by: phil | September 27, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Clarity: One last comment: I haven’t researched McCain’s position on ethanol, but I know he supports nuclear energy plants. Some people do not want food sources used for fuel. Most ethanol in the U.S. is currently derived from corn, a food source. This may be McCain’s reasoning. Just thought you might need to know this so that you didn’t say something that made you look foolish.

Posted by: Do Good | September 27, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

I work for my living. It is my money to spend as I wish. I want lower taxes, and my freedom.
Which means I cannot for the good of my family vote for Obama.

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

McCain clearly exhibited more poise. NObama just didn’t appear very comfortable.

Posted by: Jeff | September 27, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

http://www.bsf4o.com
http://www.bsf4o.com/
Who are Blue Star Families for Obama?
We represent all branches of the armed services.
We come from small towns, and the big city lights. We are wives, husbands, mothers and fathers. We are daughters, sons, and the entire extended family that gives support during deployments. Our backgrounds may be diverse, but we are united in the cause of service to our country.
We are the Military Family. And at the end of the day, there is often an empty seat at our kitchen table because our loved ones are serving far from home.
Promote our Pro-Military, Pro-Obama message.
Make a difference! Let America know that you want Barack Obama to be the next Commander in Chief!
YOU DON’T SPEAK FOR MY MILITARY FAMILY!!!!PROUD MOTHER OF 1 MARINE &
1 SAILOR. OUR MILITARY FAMILY SUPPORTS
PRO-MCCAIN & PALIN

Posted by: Tami | September 27, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

I’m for anything that improves the economy, including raising taxes, as ultimately that will make me more money and improve the outlook for my family.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

First time I have ever heard someone say that paying more taxes will make them money, are you hopeing for a new social program that pays people to sit at home?

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

My taxes are wasted. I’d rather they be wasted in the US than Iraq.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Yes taxes are wasted, because you allow the wrong people to spend them. You earned it why not desire to use it yourself?

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

I would rather my taxes not be wasted at home or abroad. You realize the massive bailout is going to cost twice the amount of Iraq. Also Fannie Mae who was not regulated by Senator Dodd and his banking committee are partially responsible for the blow up. Also nobody in the house or senate has had more money donated to them by fannie mae than senator Dodd. Also Fannie Mae has already given Senator Obama $600K and Mcain $150K. How can we let these people structure the bail out when they are being paid by wall street we are getting the screw job.

Posted by: phil | September 27, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

This is a market issue only, the market will adjust as it always does. If the government wishes to assist the correction then suspend corporate taxes, and capitol gains tax. Then just sit back and watch as tons and tons and tons of money pours into the ecomony.

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Hording money, as you are aware, does not make you more money. Spending drives the economy. People who don’t have a lot of money spend a lot of it (which is part of the current problem with mortgages). For what I do, I need those people to spend their money and if they can’t pay their mortgages it hurts my business.
So, I need the economy to be better. If the taxes are spent in the US on whatever dumb largess the government typically chooses, much of the money gets redistributed here in the US. If the money goes to pay for gas in a tank in Iraq, it drives up the cost of living here and not only does the money go poof but it means less money for people to spend here.
So, I have no desire in the least to pay the government more taxes. However, if getting the economy going means paying incrementally more then I’m not worried about it. There will always be way to reduce the tax burden…

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Why don’t you low information voters educate yourselves and go to the tax calculator website to see your actual taxes based on your income provided by Barack Obama? Oh yah, ignorance is bliss! No wonder this country is going downhill FAST!

Posted by: Eddie | September 27, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

The bailout, as proposed, is pointless. No guarantee it will work and if it doesn’t we’ll be worse off than before.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

I think those of us affected already have, Eddie. No?

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

It’s pretty obvious who won this debate tonight. RON PAUL won this debate tonight. He told you these two weren’t going to do anything to really change this country for the better and their performances proved it. He told you in 2003 the rate at which this country was borrowing money was going to lead us to an economy in crisis like we have today, AND HE WAS RIGHT!!!! VOTE THIRD PARTY THIS YEAR—IT’S THE ONLY WAY YOUR VOICE WILL REALLY BE HEARD!

Posted by: RPaul4Life | September 27, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

The way McCain/Palin is going ‘if’ they win we will not only be at 2 wars but another one.Our Military is wearing thin
with many doing 3-4 tours.A draft than will have to come into play.Even at their convention at the top people were holding banners saying McCain doesn’t support vets

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

When will people learn… This country became the economic power it is because of the freedom its citizens have to enjoy free enterprise. Our modern government only restricts growth by over taxation, and restrictions.
The mortgage problem is due once again from the government pressing mortgage companies to provide loans to…. people of limited means… (a liberal agenda) and now we must pay yet more to fix it

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Tami….you are a McStupid jerkofile. Go back to something you can actually do, run your dishwasher.

Posted by: Butch Dillon | September 27, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

JW: I think we agree on much, but the mortgage crisis was caused by greedy individuals who thought they were winning the lottery by getting mortgages they couldn’t afford from greedy lenders who knew they would be reselling the loan anyway and didn’t care that they couldn’t possibly afford the loans.
I also agree that the government restricts growth, but its job (if done correctly) avoids the inevitable wild swings that happen in free markets.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Be nice to tami, she is the perfect target democratic voter… “please let me pay more so big daddy obama will cradle me in his arms and provide everything i need”

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

In 2007, the median annual household income rose 1.3% to $50,233.00 according to the Census Bureau.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States
If you make $200,000 or more you are upper class and effects less than 2.7% of america. My wife and I made $70,000 last year. My wife is pregnant with our first and just got put on bed rest. 4 weeks till the due date.
I am a union worker(3rd year hvac/refrigeration apprentice) We have saved enough money so she can stay home for 2 months after our son is born and then she has to go back to work. I dont mind paying my share. I enjoy nice roads, schools, fire departments, police, parks,. My mother had to use welfare to raise me and my brother. I grew up in a trailer. I am the first in my family to buy a house without wheels. I am living the dream. Sure I wish my wife could stay home with our child. Times have changed.
$7.50 an hour I work goes toward my health & welfare plan. I pay $20 copays for most everything. It has doubled in the last 5 years. I always ask for the generic brand of prescriptions to use less of the funds from our medical plan.
If John McCain became president I would be taxed on the $7.50 and hour. Obama’s plan is suited for building back up the middle class that was wiped out from the Reagan days. Trickle down economics (Reagonomics) has never worked. Read how the great depression began:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_depression
Have a fantastic day and wish me luck with my first child!
-Kenny

Posted by: Kenny | September 27, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

People talk about poverty here in the USA.Wait till roe v wade is one day over turn taking women’s rights back 50 yrs with Palin not believing in abortion even with rape.So many are getting rape every single day and I wonder where they are going to put all these children.We haven’t seen nothing yet

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Greed is for sure a huge part of it, but do some research and see who was responcible for the lack of oversight and regulations. these commitees are chaired by the very democrats that not only benifited the most financially, but now have the ‘miricle’ fix… it is criminal.

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Obama was smart, proactive and promising. McCain is arrogant, narrow minded and not trustworthy. I am an Independent, leaning towards Obama.

Posted by: Independent CIO | September 27, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

Sen McCain, you are a man to be respected. Barack O. – grow up and get some respect for your elders.

Posted by: islemom | September 27, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

There’s no way we can all pay low taxes and at the same time, start new programs he has proposed. Especially since we’re getting hit with a $700,000,000,000 bailout plus the bailout for Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac, the auto bailout and God only knows what else.
Either he’s lying or he can’t count.

Posted by: midwestlady | September 27, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

“put all the children” now that sounds very hitleresk……

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

I am a firm believer that George Bush will be judged by history to be the best the president ever. John McCain will carry on his policies and legacy.
McCain/Palin 08 and God bless George Bush!

Posted by: I Love Bush | September 27, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Do Good—this problem started to happen in 1995 when the rep held the house and senate.Dem didn’t get in till 2006.The problem that is happening today just didn’t start 2 yrs ago

Posted by: Judith | September 27, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

There were a lot of people who made money during the housing boom. Both parties were in positions to stop this before it got this bad.
Like me, you probably made money in the real estate market too. And you probably got out of the investments too before things got really bad.
I do not have faith in the ‘fix’ either. Let ‘em fail is my attitude. Bigger and smarter fish like JPMorgan will eat their carcass.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Any President who is friends with a terrorist can’t be all bad. At least Obama can say that he has experience with terrorism. Can anyone say William Ayers.

Posted by: Bob | September 27, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

McCain doesn’t support ethanol because it is a bad idea. The net energy (energy out – energy in) produced in the process is very low. It takes a good deal of water to produce, both in the growing of the corn and the processing. This at a time when we are entering into an era where potable water may very well become the next scarcity.
Relying on ethanol as a fuel source ties us to the ebbs and flows of the weather. Bad crop this year? Oops can’t drive your car. In addition to this it cuts into the food supply increasing food costs. The ethanol game was really something cooked up to keep Iowa primary voters happy so that senators with presidential aspirations could make it over that first hurdle.
As for nuclear… it has got a very bad wrap. The new nuclear facility designs are incapable of meltdown. The storage issue is another distraction. We have the facilities already built. It’s in Yucca mountain. The amount of high level waste is very small if we use breeder reactors to reprocess spent fuel. France has done this with fantastic results. There’s no reason we should not be looking at this.
Nuclear plants emit less radiation into the atmosphere than coal burning since coal contains carbon-14 and the sheer volume of coal burned lets it quickly eclipse Nuclear power.
The other great advantage of nuclear power is that WE HAVE URANIUM. One of the largest supplies of it in the world. This will make America a net producer of energy, and enable us to reduce our trade imbalance.
For all of you electric car fans think of this. Where is your electricity going to come from? Coal requires mining (often strip mining), produces a lot of carbon dioxide, and releases more radioactive particles into the air than nuclear. Hydro electric requires a great deal of water to operate and often destroys the ecology of an area. Geothermal requires the right geology for it to be workable (and there are still a lot of kinks to be worked out). Solar is far and away so expensive per kW/h that it’s just not going to work. Wind is great until you have a series of very calm days. If you don’t have gigantic batteries to hold you over it will always require some sort of back up.
Oh, and let’s not forget hydrogen. Hydrogen is very volatile. That’s why it’s a great fuel. It does not exist naturally on earth for very long. So we don’t mine for hydrogen… we have to split water molecules (or mine it from the sun). What do you think it takes to split water molecules? That’s right energy. And where will you get energy from? One of the sources listed elsewhere in this post.
Nuclear also frees up other potential fuels like natural gas. Natural gas is predominantly being used in power plants at this time. If we could replace those natural gas plants with nuclear our natural gas supply would be freed up for use in cars. Since it burns so cleanly it is a great idea. However if we fuels power plants and cars with natural gas the price would go up and we would have a hard time getting natural gas adoption going. Oh and we can also produce hydrogen from the energy that nuclear produces.
So when you look at our energy policy you’re going to have to come to grips with the idea that no source is a free lunch. Each source has it’s own benefits and draw backs.
It’s my belief that bio-fuels will erode our water supplies and drive up food prices. Fossil fuels, while nice and portable, cause pollution, are eventually unsustainable, contribute to our trade imbalance, and leave up dependent on other countries. Solar and wind are just not there yet and may never be an end all solution. Nuclear to me seems to be the one fuel that is ready to produce cheap clean energy. All we need to do is use the storage options we have now (Yucca), make sure we provide adequate military personnel to secure the facilities to avoid a possible dirty bomb, and just put our will behind it. We could be energy independent inside of 20 years easily as we already have a blue print that the French have given us on how to do it successfully.

Posted by: JT | September 27, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

I wonder if anyone can show of one single government program that is managed better by the government than by private enterprise?
Anyone?

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 2:08 am 2:08 am

Sen. Obama supports the Bush Wall Street “bailout” package.
That’s “CHANGE” that taxpayers can NOT afford!

Posted by: abcblogger | September 27, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

JT: Agree with much of what you say, but will note two things:
1. Ethanol isn’t the problem; ethanol from corn is. Ethanol from sugarcane is efficient enough.
2. The nuclear assumption is based on current technologies and efficiencies. Investing in this area will likely change the dynamic.
But, right now nuclear energy is not a bad idea.

Posted by: MIguy | September 27, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Jim W: Medicare is better and less expensively administered than the private Medicare Advantage programs.

Posted by: doc | September 27, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

Medicare Advantage programs is a marketing ploy gone wrong, but atleast it is a option people can choose or reject.

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

the only right choice for our next President is Senator Clinton. anyone else at this point is akin to slapping our children, our troops and America in the face

Posted by: chris | September 27, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Right when America needs a great president in the worst way, we get these two clowns.I think the manager of the convenience store down the block would make a better president.

Posted by: ShootMeNow | September 27, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

HEADLINE: Obama votes “Present” at tonight’s debate.
Appeared to be wearing the same old tired “tax and spend” lipstick from the Jimmy Carter administration.
When will Democrats learn that Socializm is not the answer?

Posted by: abcblogger | September 27, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Jim….I want some of what you are smoking….Dubya the best president in our history? Are you kidding me? Yeah, forget Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson, Roosevelt…JFK…just to name a few…you Republicans are freaking insane…..talking about a president who’s said things like “They misunderestimated me” and ‘Rarely is the question asked: Is our children learning?’

Posted by: Tyler | September 27, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

The real winners are Russia, Iran, and ….Venezuela..This video will make u both laugh and cry. at what America has become a propaganda state controlled from socialist media….. People don’t even realize how much freedom they are losing before their own eyes !!!………………….. http://www.atlah.org/broadcast/ndnr09-03-08.html

Posted by: SeanBean | September 27, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

This country was founded by those individual that had grit, a spirit of hope, not hope that some uncle sam would save and help them, but real hope that lead them to create a life, an existence of their own destiny.
Today our country has become lazy, children poorly raised. Adults with no desire to strive for success, always looking for someone else to ‘give it’ to them.
This country became the greatest country in history, because its founders and its people said “We can do it… work hard”
If everyone found and ‘lived’ to true meaning of self-reliant then we would not be having these debates and discussions. The government would be doing the job that our forefathers intended and nothing more. Once again this country would be the envy of the world.
“a government of the people, by the people, for the people”
Not a country of the ‘entitled’

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

blondielasvegas — you must be one of those idiots I almost got killed by who was driving a giant suv slathering on makeup and yappin on a cell phone. $250k is a ton of money to middle class people. That is a salary executives make at larger corporations. You are obviously out of touch just like McCain is.

Posted by: Eruc | September 27, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

Ethanol is not a solution. The average MPG on that crud drops like a rock so we’re consuming that much more of it and damaging food prices in the process. Corn is the cornerstone for all our terrible food supply… high fructose corn syrup is our best choice to bloated American children!

Posted by: Eruc | September 27, 2008, 2:41 am 2:41 am

Law of the Jungle – Survival of the fittest.
Law of Manifest Domain – Divide and conquer.
Law of the Government – Tuck tail and bail.
As an independent voter, IMO, McCain won this debate.

Posted by: arianna | September 27, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

All McCain could do is strike his one note insistence on the military and on being confrontational. McCain had VERY LITTLE in specifics on any of the issues discussed. Instead all he could do is spout slogans and insults, but he really showed that he will be at least as bad as Bush on the economy, and at least as rigid and inflexible in his foreign policy and continue to put all the country’s eggs in the Iraq basket and let us just rot at home, while he does nothing to help the average people. I am not imitating anything the talking heads have said. I could see this on my own. Obama was head and shoulders more knowledgable on the issues, on details and on specifics of what he would do in each area and he spent more time than he should have had to debunking McCain’s constant lies and distortions and put downs. McCain made an #### of himself being a scolding, condescending old cad with no finesse at all and just a lot of hot air anecdotes that had little to do with the issues. Obama wasn’t even allowed to respond to half the BS McCain said because McCain just tried to shout him down and g###ed on and on. McCain also showed he will continue the same bankrupt garbage that Bush is doing for the most part, with his knee-jerk, rigid, confrontationalist approach that hasn’t worked for the last 8 years for Bush and will just drive America further down the ####…..You must be a doctrinaire reactionary to think McCain did anything but his standard insulting sloganeering. Obama should have thrown it back in McCain’s face that it is he (McCain) who DOESN’T UNDERSTAND much of anything except continuing the same crappy mistakes he’s been making for the last 26 years in the Senate. All he can do is yell ‘surge, surge’ and ‘victory, victory’ and ‘all confrontation, sll the time’. This crap To all you cons who think McCain is so wonderful, you must be indoctrinated morons. Obama was eloquent and specific on his policies, his plans and his knowledge of the issues and their nuances. McCain can’t and won’t stop repeating his same old condescending put-downs, distortions and outright mischaracterizatins of Obama’s record. And whether Obama gets the exact figure of his tax threshold exactly right, this article here on ABC News makes a mountain out of a molehill while ignoring all of McCain’s blatant misstatements. McCain showed, during the debates tonight that he stands for the same old rigid polices of Bush on most things and he is completely a ‘one note wonder’ about military confrontation and about the surge, and he lies about his own record in the Senate. McCain is who helped get our country into the mess it’s in. The press isn’t being biased to report what was said tonight. The cons don’t like it because it shows up their revisionism. In fact Jim Lehrer gave McCain a lot more time for his blowhard sloganeering than he gave Obama time to respond to the longwinded harangues of this old, dead-horse-idea-windbag who is NOT a straight talker but straight out con artist and unmannerly cad.

Posted by: JL | September 27, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

Eruc – the arrogance of pretending to make a judgment about a person because of their level of income is the epitome of class envy. “You have more than me so it should be taken away from you” every person in the world who makes an honest living whether 25k a year or 250k a year should be applauded for having the drive to succeed and prosper as individuals. Shame on you ‘the jealous’

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

JL- Thank you for your eloquent, frothing, virulent, scathing tirade of McCain. I truly did not think it was possible for someone to speak that much and not actually have any valid point. Astounding. ;)

Posted by: Jim W. | September 27, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Finally, someone is doing critical analysis of Obama’s pandering and wholesale misrepresations. Good job on calling Obama what he is, a real liar.

Posted by: speedy_453 | September 27, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am

McCain gave a good spanking to Obama in the debate. If you are using your brain, you would have seen that Obama is clueless and simply likes to sniff the wind for what is popular. He has no backbone and no real principles. Obama’s only concern is his personal political advancement.

Posted by: speedy_453 | September 27, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

I think this fact check is wrong. Look at Obama’s web site that lays out his tax plan. Capital gains, including those on dividends, do not increase for people making less than $250,000.

Posted by: Steve | September 27, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

A government who has more control is also the same government that can it away.
Large government dissolves individual liberties into regulated group state-controlled oppression.
It’s what our forefathers left. It is the premise for Communism that always results in dictatorships and human rights abuse.
Vote for Obama and you will have a dangerous Jimmy Carter II with Marxist agendas.
Keep your personal liberties, keep your freedoms, vote for McCain.

Posted by: jetx | September 27, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

Steve: so now you will do the honest impartial reporting? Wow, how brainwashed can you be. Can’t you see Obama for what he is? He is full of fluff, with no new ideas. All he says is change. Well, for your information, change is not necessary the same as good or progress. You can change in the wrong direction, which is what Obama will do.

Posted by: speedy_453 | September 27, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

I am oustanded that we are even comparing Obama to McCain. McCain comes from a long line of american patriots. He has served his country well for decades in many capacities. McCain will do what is right for the country even if it means standing up to big business. He was one of the key players in killing a sweetheart deal between a big aerospace giant and the airforce that was not in the best interest of america. Americans can’t be serious that they would rather have Obama than McCain.

Posted by: speedy_453 | September 27, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

ABC is mad that Mr. Obama wiped the floor with McSame during the debate tonight. Just look at the polls republicans were liking what Mr. Obama was saying.
I noticed you people had the KKK at the debate. Dont you know that those tactics is causing your guy the election?

Posted by: Curtis | September 27, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

Obama’s promise of tax cut for middle class is hardly true. He relies on the closing the offshore tax loopholes of big international corporations. Noway, they simply registered in Bermuda like Midland Bank of New York, once becoming HSBC international bank, then it registered in Channel Islands and Obama never can get its offshore profit even he close the offshore tax haven. Ibama is either ignorant in day dream of talking or he is deceiving us for our votes.

Posted by: timtam1701 | September 27, 2008, 3:15 am 3:15 am

Curtis, the polls are all doctored to be in favor of that stations’ political bias. CNN, MSNBC and ABC are all heavily in favor of Obama, so the polls reflect this.
You are seeing the true takes on this message board, simply because it isn’t moderated as the posts come in.
If you look at CNN’s message boards, they are moderated and the posts are filtered – and you guessed it – all pro-Obama.
Now, let’s do some “straight talk” here. Obama was schooled tonight. It is obvious he is “wet behind the ears” and failed to address the real important topics that McCain made very good points on. Obama talked in circles.

Posted by: jetx | September 27, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

Curtis: you are trying to inject KKK comments into the discussion? What about rev wright? what about the NAACP? Stay to the facts and accept the fact that your candidate took a beating tonight and was exposed for the flip flopper and panderer that he is.
Latinos for McCain

Posted by: speedy_453 | September 27, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

McCain can’t get his hands on the button. He is eratic, reckless, and out of touch. We need 21st century ideas.

Posted by: D. Held | September 27, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

21st century ideas are New World Order ideas. New World Order ideas = WWIII.
Obama is all NWO – the US to become the North American Union by 2010. A new currency introduced called the ‘Amero’ and buffering Russia by NATO containment of former provinces.
During Obama’s NWO speech in German, Russia threatened to fly Nuclear bombers over to Cuba? They do not want a US-led NWO.
The world will never be a Utopia, because those in power want to be in control of that Utopia. Greed begets more greed which results in oppressive laws to keep the masses “in check”. Sound like Communism? Yeah. It looks good on paper, but never works in the real-world and simply never will. It goes against human nature and the quest for power.
McCain is definitely the safer bet. Now is not the time for radicalism or the rules of Obama’s reading material “rules for radicals”. We need some change, but the right change. Stable and measured change.

Posted by: jetx | September 27, 2008, 3:33 am 3:33 am

McCain supporters calling Obama a liar: Pot calling the kettle black.
Jetx: CNN is a fairly conservative station, but they are trying not to show their conservative bias too openly. You are just too used to Foxnews and Rush Limbaugh’s talkshows to appreciate where the center is.
You see = Foxnews is one extreme and Al-Jazeera another. CNN is somewhere in the middle.

Posted by: Luka | September 27, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

Judith,
McCain bashers have been falsely claiming that he didn’t support the Webb GI bill.
The truth is that McCain wanted the bill revised to include transferability of all or a portion of a service member’s benefits to a spouse or child after serving more than one enlistment.
By supporting this revised bill, McCain accomplished two significant things:
the No.1 request of career service members regarding education and that the GI Bill would help retain the young leaders necessary to maintain an all-volunteer work force.
That is the total truth versus the half-truth that you posted.

Posted by: Donoke9_10 | September 27, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

As a country we have all gleefully spent ourselves into a pretty ugly amount of debt. Over the last 8 years the top 5% of income earners have consistenly benefited from very significant tax breaks. These two facts nobody can deny or obfuscate, NOBODY. Now it is time for these top 5% of income earners to step up to the plate and help out their country. Its called PATRIOTISM.

Posted by: Tom | September 27, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am

Are you McCain people nuts, or just blind. I have watched the whole debate 3 times, on CNN this evening.
McCain is a record stuck on one thing he claims to be the top person on. Foreign affairs.
But sorry folks, he was schooled by Obama.
McCain looks like an uninformed, politician. He distorted facts, would look no one in the eyes, and fumbled through the evening. No wonder he picked someone with less ability than himself.
If he had picked someone with ability, he would have come off as even less capable.

Posted by: ruby2 | September 27, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

Lee, Obama never said 95% of Americans won’t pay taxes. Everybody pays taxes, even people on fixed incomes. He’s saying there won’t be a tax INCREASE. There’s a difference. Those looking for a reason to object Obama, regardless, nit-pick and dissect everything he says until they can come up with something to justify why they never intended to vote for him anyway.

Posted by: What_He_really_Say | September 27, 2008, 3:57 am 3:57 am

OBAMA IS A FRAUD.
MAC KICKED HIM TO THE CURB IN THIS DEBATE.
I’M EXCITED TO SEE THE BARACUDA WIPE THE FLOOR WITH GAFFE-TASTIC BIDEN.

Posted by: Bob | September 27, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am

1.) Obama’s tax plan will reduce taxes for EVERYONE making less than $200,000 per year. It will raise taxes for individuals making more than $200,000, and for families making more than $250,000, per year.
2.) McCain’s tax plan will reduce the taxes on the top 1 percent by an average of $700,000 per year.
3. Yes, those who make the most money currently pay most of the taxes BECAUSE THEY MAKE A LOT MORE MONEY than the overwhelming majority of us. In addition, they’ve been feeding at the trough of the federal government for the last 25 years. The top 2 percent in this country get more in government handouts every year than is spent on ALL social welfare programs.
4.) The top 1 percent earn 34 percent of all income. The next 4 percent earn 25 percent of all income. That’s right, the top 5 percent gets almost 60 percent of all income earned in the U.S. each year.
5.) The top 5 percent is taking 4 percent more of the total income pie now than they were 25 years ago. There is no such thing as a “trickle down effect”. We have a trickle UP effect in progress and it is abundantly clear that it’s the result of tax policies favoring the most wealthy at the expense of the middle class.
6.) There is no statistical evidence – absolutely none – that lower tax rates for the wealthy improves the performance of the national economy. There is obvious evidence that higher taxes – when applied ONLY to the very top of the income pyramid – DOES improve economic performance. There is also obvious evidence that lower taxes for the bottom 95 percent of earners also results in stronger economic performance.
There are 2 reasons for this:
1.) Cutting taxes for the wealthy inspires them to immediately remove a larger percentage of funds than usual from productive enterprises – which has happened every single time it’s been done. The result: less money being spent by wage earners who must spend most of their income. The higher the tax rate for the wealthy, the better the economy will be for everyone.
2.) Cutting taxes for people with moderate incomes results in more money spent on food, manufactured commodities and services; again increasing business activity and improving the macro-economy as more new jobs are created and salaries rise.
In addition, raising taxes for the top of the income pyramid and lowering taxes for the rest of us makes America a MUCH stronger nation. The middle class is being gutted and the result will be not just economic. Along with the decline of the economy (whether or not we keep borrowing money from China, since our credit line has pretty much been tapped) comes the decline of American military power. It’s not possible to spend more money on the military than all the other countries of the world combined (which is currently the case) when it’s all being done with borrowed money.
Luckily, Obama is going to pad his lead in the polls with his debate performance tonight and win the election in November. Luckily, McCain is being seen by most Americans as both reckless and erratic (if not simply a bumbling clown); because if he were president he would cause the country to collapse faster than Dumbya can say “nukuler”.

Posted by: Martel | September 27, 2008, 4:15 am 4:15 am

It makes me sick that people continue to perpetrate this lie that Obama doesn’t put his hand over his heart during the Pledge of Allegiance. I’ve seen him do it every time I’ve seen him say the pledge. It’s these lies that moved this Independent over to the Obama side. I am so turned off by what I now see as fear mongering and lying, there’s no way I could even consider McCain as President. He would run this country like he has his campaign. McCain is irratic and thinks the country owes him something.

Posted by: Didi | September 27, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am

Aside from McCain’s inability to look people in the eye when he’s lying, he can’t really convince those who haven’t drunk the kool-aid that he has any idea what he’s talking about. Hell, he can’t wake up in the morning without disagreeing with everything he said the day before.
Fortunately, we’ve only got a little more than a month of this farce left because McCain’s campaign is a raging embarrassment to the American people, and is diminishing our standing and whatever we have left of our formerly pretty good reputation, all around the world.

Posted by: Martel | September 27, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am

Each man is clearly a reflection of his past. McCain is the third generation of pugistic, military people who want to focus upon the aggression of others and brag about not being “Miss Congeniality”. Obama continues to be the victim of others’ aggression (e.g. racism) and wants to be able to make peace with “enemies”. McCain has trouble imagining this. Too bad John Lennon isn’t alive to see this.

Posted by: Max | September 27, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

Ruby2, you are as bad as Obama. Your simply make accusations without offering viable alternatives. To an ignorant uninformed person,Obama may have sounded reasonable,however to say he school anyone is preposterous. His lack of knowledge in international politics is embarrassing. Ruby you are either Senator Obama’s lover or an imbecile.

Posted by: cris | September 27, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am

Obama also constantly overstates his record of opposing the Iraq war. He was a lowly state level senator when our Congress voted to authorize war in Iraq. No one was interested on what he thought about the war then, and he didn’t have any skin in the game. He was never on the hook. He wasn’t tasked with the safety and security of 300,000,000 people, if he had been, perhaps he’d have thought differently. As it is, Obama NEVER voted against going to war in Iraq. He didn’t join the U.S. Senate until 2005. We went into Iraq in 2003. What if Sarah Palin went around saying that she stood against the Iraq war from the beginning? In 2003 she was serving as chair of Alaska’s Oil and Gas Commission. You need to have voted against something to say you stood against it, in the context in which Obama says he did. It’s easy to stand against something when nobody cares what you think.

Posted by: Christopher McElree | September 27, 2008, 4:32 am 4:32 am

I am self employed and know the pain already of letting people go, people that have worked for me for years that are like family. It is already hard enough to run a business that makes money. Taxing the so called rich always sounds good but the consequences are very real to the families that will lose their jobs over it. In the last 5 years I have went from paying $440 a month for my insurance to cover my whole family to paying just under $1000 a month. The coverage has gotten worse, the co-pay is also up 400%. If cost continue to rise small business’s like mine will go away. Talk to any economist or accountant and you will see how bad Obama will be for the economy. That is not a republican talking those are facts. I have voted democrat in the 90′s and the last election for obvious reason, and as much as Palin scares the crap out of me, I dont think I can vote for Obama.
Posted by: phil | Sep 27, 2008 1:33:20 AM
Actually you’re wrong. I’m an investor at UBS Financial handling million dollar accounts, and most investors I know at UBS are voting Obama. My own portfolio is over 2 million; down about $200k since the market start bailing, but I’m more skeptical of a McCain presidency than Obama, considering the last 8 years.
Don’t listen to Republican talking points, they’re just trying to scare you. Obama isn’t as extreme as they portray him.

Posted by: Chad | September 27, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

One more thing. If you’re having health insurance issues, Obama will do MUCH more for you than McCain would. Read up.

Posted by: Chad | September 27, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

Um…..Obama lied about several things tonight. He did oppose NUCLEAR power. He is a pandering for votes. In layman terms…..Obama is lying for votes. McCain is the better canidate

Posted by: jon | September 27, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

One more thing. If you’re having health insurance issues, Obama will do MUCH more for you than McCain would. Read up.

Posted by: Chad | September 27, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

People wake up. Obama’s positions on issues change all the time. Another elitist lying to the ignorant masses.

Posted by: jon | September 27, 2008, 4:41 am 4:41 am

McCain has real experience in high level politics, and it shows. Obama stutters, ahhhhs, annnnndsss, ect.. Obama is a junior first term senator. LOL He is NOT ready for the job, he doesn’t have the experience.

Posted by: jon | September 27, 2008, 4:45 am 4:45 am

Obama can rightly claim the crown from Tony Blair as the The SpinMaster.
There always seems to be that little discrepancy in everything he says.

Posted by: Paul, UK | September 27, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

Partly it’s because he has a compulsive constant need to tell us about it while saying that he doesn’t like to talk about it, but I get pissed off every time I hear McCain called a ‘hero’ as if he’s somehow deserving of adulation because he was a POW.
Don’t get me wrong. He served his country and he was wounded in the process; but he was no more (and a lot less) of a hero than all of the other vets who faithfully served their country and were wounded.
Regarding his POW experience, he had several unflattering nicknames which belie his performance. “Hanoi Songbird” comes to mind. His propaganda videos for North Vietnam and his willingness to give the North Vietnamese accurate military information did not earn hero status.
Am I saying that he was some kind of traitor? Absolutely not at all. Again, he served his country to the best of his ability and he should be commended for his service no matter what he said or did in captivity. But I do not want to hear him called ‘hero’ one more time.
There were many thousands of REAL heroes in that war and many hundreds of actual heroes in the POW camps – some who performed heroic acts before being captured, and others who simply never gave their captors whatever they wanted.
So the next time he pulls out that story to gain sympathy for himself and distract everyone’s attention from one of his many stupid or nefarious statements/deeds, just laugh. If enough people would do that, maybe he’d eventually have to put a stop to his BS.

Posted by: Martel | September 27, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

It is clear that we as Americans need a schooling in the Hegelian Dialectic, and not the co-opted model perpetuated by Engels in the 19th century. We progress and grow more civilized through controversy. In essence, both senators seem uncomfortable with their differences because they needed to remain on a carefully scripted message to connect with an audience mostly lacking in intellectual curiosity and critical thinking skills (not unlike our current president). To capture the hearts and minds of the undecided (those who are thinking throughout this campaign instead of running on received knowledge), both candidates must learn to express a personal epistemology.

Posted by: Matt | September 27, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

I think it’s accurate enough, as couples are the biggest issue… how many people do you know that make that much money all by themselves?!
(Not too many, I’d guess!)
Meanwhile, McCain viciously insulted one of Pakistan’s two major political leaders, by saying that he ran a “failed state”.
He never once pointed out that General Musharraf took it upon himself to start a border war with India that killed thousands, was exiled for insubordination and inciting a coup, and then conspired with his military cronies to overthrow an extremely popular democratically elected government!

Posted by: M. Ochoa | September 27, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

Guess ABC would like to split hairs because Sen. Obama didn’t explicitly say “couples”. $250,000 for couples, everyone who has been listening knows what Sen. Obama’s plan is because they’ve heard him say this numerous times. Guess ABC missed the McCain gaffe regarding Pakistan. Pakistan was NOT a failed state before the Musharraf coup d’etat, it was a functioning democracy. Foreign affairs is supposed to be McCain’s area of expertise. Well, when compared to Palin that may be true.

Posted by: Alfalfa | September 27, 2008, 4:55 am 4:55 am

Judith:please don’t speak for all of us military members and families when you say the military promotes Obama. Keep supporting him and then cry when the military doesn’t get a raise one year, or sees cuts to the benefits they were promised upon joining the military. Obama has all ready said he’s going to cut the defense budget. Yes, raises do come from that budget. You might want to rethink the candidate that you’re promoting. McCain will take care of the military, Obama wil not.

Posted by: J | September 27, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

I hate seeing ignorant people saying that Obama is a fraud. Specifically those who naively support the bullying Republican party without just cause. Though I cannot find any particular just cause to do so.
The last 8 years have been a completely devastating failure on both the economic and foreign fronts. This failure was brought upon the unfair election of Bush over Gore. The road blocks to precincts in democratic communities in Florida were one example. The worst example was when the Republican U.S. Supreme court justices overturned the Florida supreme court decision of counting votes that couldn’t properly process through the counting machines. What was the reason for not counting votes that a machine couldn’t process? Probably because the election poll for Florida favored Gore by roughly 10% and Gore would win in the event of a fair election. Was there a coincidence that Florida had the biggest percentage of error in their voting counts, which ultimately caused Bush to win the Florida electoral college by merely 500 votes?
The point is that the Republican party has been feeding lies the American people in the past 8 years. Probably the biggest in our time was that “there our weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.” This statement, investigated by well respected reporter Tim Weiner as explained in his Pulitzer Prize book Legacy of Ashes, was told to the Americans without any clue of evidence found by any of our intelligence resources.
It’s about time to bring back the country to the respectable Democratic party, and time to bring many of the corrupt Republican government officials to justice. Not only that, the Democratic party caters to the overwhelming majority of this country– the middle class and below. With his economic plan which has been analyzed by many experts to have significant chance of success, especially more than the plan of Mccain, Americans will have the opportunity to live in a nation with a thriving economy and higher standard of living.
In all cases, support the Obama’s plans which have been deemed credible by many analysts, and forget Mccain’s desperate measures of telling ancient history about his experiences. The case of the presidency concerns the future not the past. With Mccain, the economy will stay as it has been in the past years. With Obama, change has finally come, and and he will be the turning point in our Nation’s economic and foreign policy for the better.

Posted by: richard | September 27, 2008, 5:01 am 5:01 am

“McCain has real experience in high level politics. Obama stutters.” – Posted by jon
Aside from the fact that his “real experience” has produced a neverending stream of absolutely contradictory statements on nearly every possible issue for the last 25 years, and aside from the fact that in his old age he can’t seem to stick with an opinion for more than a day, and aside from the fact that all those years in the Senate haven’t done anyone but him (and the wealthiest among us) any good, he continually stutters and ahhhhhs and uhnnnns while tripping over names, policies, facts and his own outright lies.
I’m sure, though, that a man who simply can’t look his opponent in the face would make a really good negotiator with the likes of a Putin, right? Oh, wait, I forgot. America doesn’t negotiate with countries that don’t do as they’re told. We bomb ‘em to teach ‘em a lesson; and if they have oil, we invade ‘em…even if invading ‘em means that thousands of our best and bravest are killed, nobody gets the oil, and we have to pay more for our gas guzzlers.

Posted by: Martel | September 27, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

On health care……Um…..Obama is nothing but promise. What has he done???? Nothing ! He voted presented in state legislation. He won his election by disqualifying his opposition with legal trickery. LOL Promises???? Nothing but empty do nothing promises. He George Bush gave us tax deductible health savings accounts, and guess what ….THEY WORK !!!!! Look that up pal, it’s called an HSA Account, and it works. Obama has a hard time speaking with out the teleprompter and it shows. He came accross in the debate like a kid trying to remember a text book. Obama just doesn’t have the experience, and he is promising everything to everybody just to get a vote. I give the example of his position on Nuclear Power prior to the debate, and what he tried to play off during the debate.

Posted by: jon | September 27, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Again I say it….Obama…ah ah ah stutters. LOL He just doesn’t have it together, and his inexperience shows. He is lying to get votes. His tax plan will raise taxes on everyone that makes dividends, or capital gains. This is typical bait and switch lies.

Posted by: jon | September 27, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am

I also noticed that Obama miss spoke several times, and his diction is off. You can tell alot about a liar that pauses looking for another lie. :) And we thought Jimmy Carter was bad ????? Obama is just not electable material.

Posted by: jon | September 27, 2008, 5:34 am 5:34 am

“McCain will take care of the military. Obama will not.” – Posted by J
Maybe we weren’t listening to the same debate. Both of them talked about cutting the military budget. It needs to be cut. It HAS to be cut. We can’t afford to spend more for the military budget than all of the rest of the world put together anymore.
In addition, from a national security point of view, we can’t afford to be eternally engaged in multiple wars. What happens if there is a need to actually defend this country? We don’t have the available manpower or the equipment to effectively respond to a serious attack without letting the nukes fly, and we certainly don’t have the ability to engage with a third enemy. If, for example, Chavez decides to use the Russian weaponry he’s buying to carve up South America in order to build a ‘Greater Venezuela’, who’s going to stop him?
Putting all of that aside, you should do some research on McCain’s ACTUAL RECORD when it comes to his votes in the Senate on appropriations bills that would benefit veterans and the men and women currently in our armed forces. He has a real easy time saying “NO” when it comes to your medical and financial wellbeing. It almost seems as if he believes he’s the only man who really deserves anything because of service to his country. Obama, in contrast, has just the opposite attitude.

Posted by: Martel | September 27, 2008, 5:43 am 5:43 am

Karen wrote:”At least McCain was born here and has served his country.”
The fact is Barack Obama was born in Honolulu, Hawaii. Last I checked, that was a state of the United States. John McCain, on the other hand, was born in the Panama Canal Zone. The Panama Canal Zone is not a state of the United States, but was a territory of the United States at the time McCain was born.
Yes, John McCain served his country in the military. Graduated near last in his class and got shot down and taken prisoner of war. If you want to talk about war heros, you should be talking about John Kerry. But something tells me you didn´t vote for him back in 2004. Instead we had Bush the Disaster for another 4 miserable years. When are you going to see the light?
Obama/Biden 2008.

Posted by: George | September 27, 2008, 6:03 am 6:03 am

250G. Wonder how many people are in that tax bracket. With McCain having 7 houses, 13 cars, wondering if he knows what it’s like to be an average voting citizen. From what I have learned, McCain seems to come from a privileged pedigree compared to the majority of voting citizens.

Posted by: Lawrence | September 27, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

jon:
How much is the RNC paying you for posting? Hopefully, they aren’t blowing away too much of their ‘Big Lie’ advertising fund on you. You need to keep in mind the fact that nearly everyone reading your inane posts actually saw with their own eyes and heard with their own ears what happened in the debate. You can tell us that what we didn’t see and what we didn’t hear is what actually happened, but it won’t have any effect. The only individual in the debate who was having real trouble with diction/pronunciation/speaking-without-a-teleprompter was McCain. And it was clearly an embarrassment (although he really doesn’t do much better WITH a teleprompter). If you can’t play your little propaganda game believably, why waste your time? Yes, I know, they’ve told you to attack Obama on McCain’s weak points because the resulting disconnect from reality will serve as a useful distraction but, again, we all saw the ACTUAL debate…not the one you WISH you saw.
Oh yeah, health savings accounts. They work real well. Nobody has really discovered who or what they’re helping – with the exception of driving up the cost of health care – but they’re very effective at that. As you said, Dumbya gave it to you, not McCain.
McCain wants to take that a few steps further by taxing employer paid health insurance in order to drive up the cost to the employer so that the insurance companies can make a killing.
When an employer eliminates the group health benefit, his employees can then negotiate their own insurance premiums without having any leverage as part of a group. Think of the campaign contributions!
There’s a reason why universal health care is a necessity that ALL of the other developed nations of the world have. It’s LESS EXPENSIVE…and that is NOT because the government is paying the bill. It’s less expensive in other countries because insurance companies and pharmaceutical companies aren’t making huge profits from medical care. Look up the facts. Do the research. Americans pay out a higher percentage of our gross domestic product for health care than in any other country of the developed world (and it’s projected to rise to 20 percent of GDP within 10 years)…and that doesn’t take into account the 40 to 50 million people in this country without any health care coverage at all.

Posted by: Martel | September 27, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Which college did Obama attended? He needs to get his money back. Obama stutters so much and sometime hard to follow when he talk. I am not trying to be funny but Obama remind me of Bush when he talk.

Posted by: suzy | September 27, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

Obama clearly won. McCain merely spews his anti-Obama half-truths and lies. Obama showed that a President thinks and speaks clearly. Our next President lives in the 21st century not the last – Ronald Reagan?? Obama was against the war in Iraq and understands that we need to get out of the most misguided, inept miscarriage of foreign policy every. Earth to McCain – you were for the war. The reasons for the war were lies. We need to finish the fight in Afganistan where the 9/11 attackers planned and plotted – it wasn’t frickin’ Iraq!

Posted by: dmg | September 27, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am

How many paid bloggers are on this site?!
As someone who watched the debate without going in with a strong feeling toward either candidate, I’m surprised by so many comments that McCain “won”. No one “won”. But I must say, McCain SHOULD of won, but didn’t. I think that’ll help Obama greatly, especially since this was supposed to be McCain’s turf.
Many of you are also making some interesting comments alluding to Obama being a Muslim. You can’t have it both ways – you can’t blame him for going to a CHRISTIAN church for 20 years with a reverand you don’t like, and at the same time state he’s a Muslim. He is not.
Please people, let’s deal with facts and not spin.

Posted by: Observer | September 27, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

I was undecided and this debate and also selections of VP’s have made me come to the conclusion of voting for Obama. His choice of VP and debate was strong. All politicians tell half truths is the lesser of the evil. But, I was very disappointed of McCain’s pick, he didn’t pick someone for the betterment of the country, he picked Palin to get female votes and to show he wants change no matter what affect it will have on America. Obama could’ve picked Hillary, but he choose what was best for America someone with more experience in foreign affairs and government policies. He chose for America, McCain chose for self. This tells me how decisions are going to be made of a President. I pick Obama, he has the interests of America.

Posted by: wahiawagal | September 27, 2008, 6:28 am 6:28 am

I was on the fence until last night. I was really dissappointed in Obama’s performance last night. I was hoping to see him come up with some specifics on what he would do for the economy and foreign policy. I was really surprise to see that some people actually thought he won the debate. Sad to say, but I think Hillary would have put up a better fight. Objectively speaking, McCain clearly won the debate. Obama never seemed to answer the questions and at times seemed to babble on with no point. He also came across as disrespectful by referring to Senator John McCain as “John”. He tried to impress his audience with his pronounciation of “Pakistan” and “Taliban”. I typically vote Democrat or Independent, but I am leaning towards McCain.

Posted by: Simon | September 27, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am

Why would ABC print this article? This begins to imply that ABC isn’t in the tank for Obama. Is this an attempt to deceive the american people? Is ABC trying to cover both sides? I don’t believe it.

Posted by: Eric Drexil Holland | September 27, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

J Mc is one little knuckle head!!!

Posted by: parrada | September 27, 2008, 6:45 am 6:45 am

McCain is the clear winner in the debate. It is a mismatch between a heavyweight McCain and a lightweight Obama.

Posted by: joe | September 27, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am

Remember the Keating Five, McCain was one of the 5 Senators that was involved in that scandal. It was the Savings and Loan scandal, that cost the taxpayers 500 Billion dollars almost 20 years ago. What else is ironic, is that one of the people was George W Bush’s brother. I guess you can say, steal with one brother, while you vote with the other brother.

Posted by: Tom | September 27, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Obama gave a specific timeline and plan for ending the Iraq War. While McCain spoke of ending the war with victory, he never gave any specific timeline or plan. It became clear that McCain is a hot head, stubborn, grumpy man who will use our military like toy soldiers to play endless wars with a “Crusader” mentality…

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am

“He tried to impress his audience with his pronounciation of “Pakistan” and “Taliban”"
I think that betrays your bias. Why would you assume he’s pronouncing them correctly to impress the audience, as opposed to pronouncing them correctly because – y’know – it’s correct?

Posted by: Aengil | September 27, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

Of course we all realize that McCain is old and dumb. Why did Obama let him get away with that bull about “Victory” in Iraq.
This is Bush’s dumb and pointless war and McCain doesn’t seem to understand…
He’s the Poster Boy of 20th Century Not Understanding.

Posted by: Bill in NC | September 27, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am

It seems strange that John McCain would choose a running mate who is the subject of an ethics probe of this sort, which if it turns out badly could damage his chances right before the election. But this only proves what a high risk gamble the decision to choose Palin was in addition to her serious lack of experience should she ever become president in the event of some national emergency.
Do we really want a 72 year old “high risk” gambler, who sings “bomb, bomb Iran”…who reacts without questioning that “we are all Georgians”…who violated the military code of conduct as a POW by giving more than name, rank and serial number (he gave the location of his target and his base in return for preferential treatment by his captors)… who divorced his first wife and mother of his children, Carol, not for biblically allowed reasons (adultery) but merely because, while waiting faithfully as a POW wife, she was in a car wreck on Christmas Eve and when McCain returned 2 years later, she wasn’t quite the “fashion model” anymore (she gained some weight and walked with a limp, So much for “in sickness or in health,” right?, who was found guilty of GROSS POOR JUDGMENT in the Keating 5 scandal, who erratically suspends his campaign for the POTUS because he is un-prepared and scared…
Sadly, McCain’s life story is that of a morally bankrupt individual and he is NOT qualified to be president nor commander in chief.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:10 am 7:10 am

Obama’s opponents have become obsessed with Wright, Rezco, and Ayers! LOL, it’s as if they’re hoping to God that there is some “magic” in continuously screaming their names. Ha, that incantation has lost its power, folks! That party is over, kaput, gone, bye…bye! And, guess what? Obama still leads by every metric possible! On the other hand, Sarah Failin is actually under real ethics investigations by her state legislature! She has a real ETHICS PROBLEM! No way, no how, no McCain, no Failin! OBAMA 08…YES, WE CAN!!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am

When we went to war with Panama, we got Noriega and that was it. Only an idiot would try to change an entire regime, when, all ya had to do was pluck out Saddam as we did Noriega>>>if that really was the issue. The “surge” was not necessary, cause, the reduction in violence has been from the fact that we “hired” all of Saddam’s former party members (The Awakening). We could have done that without any troops. BUSH/MCCAIN/FAILIN are slap idiots!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am

McCain/Failing ticket is a vote for more of Bush economics, more of Bush foreign policy (“The Bush Doctrine”), and more Bush ethics of denial, secrecy, and lack of accountability. Expect more Enrons, bailouts, and increased debt to China. Long gone will be the days when Bill Clinton created a surplus for the government. Heck, McCain brings a VP nominee already embroiled in investigation for abuse of power. His solution is to berate the investigative process, which was started before she was picked to be his nominee. Sarah Failin has learned all she needs to know, can you say EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE? What a Crockpot of fecal matter!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

WOW!!! Gotta mark this day down on the calendar. ABC writes a negative story about Obama. Probably won’t see this again until after November elections.

Posted by: JRS | September 27, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

Only 2% of households earn more than $250,000 per year. Obama will CUT TAXES on the 98% who earn less than $250,000 per year; and, Obama will increase taxes on the 2% earning more than $250,000 per year. WHICH GROUP ARE YOU IN?????

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

the goal of media today is to inform. right. or to create conflict so you come back so they can push ads to sell you things. don’t be stupid.
25% of mccain’s tax cuts go to families making more than $2.8 million. go to taxpolicycenter.org. the tax tables are right there for anyone who has a brain to read directly.
while we’re on topic, which bracket are you?.
……………… MCCAIN …………. OBAMA
Income ……. Avg tax bill ……. Avg. tax bill
Over $2.9M …. -$269,364 (-4.4%)… +$701,885 (+11.5%)
$603K and up…. -$45,361 (-3.4%)… +$115,974 (+8.7%)
$227K-$603K…… -$7,871 (-3.1%)…….. +$12 (+0.0%)
$161K-$227K…… -$4,380 (-3.0%)….. -$2,789 (-1.9%)
$112K-$161K…… -$2,614 (-2.5%)….. -$2,204 (-2.1%)
$66K-$112K …… -$1,009 (-1.4%)….. -$1,290 (-1.8%)
$38K-$66K …….. -$319 (-0.7%)….. -$1,042 (-2.4%)
$19K-$38K …….. -$113 (-0.5%)……. -$892 (-3.6%)
Under $19K ……… -$19 (-0.2%)……. -$567 (-5.5%)
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/11/news/economy/candidates_taxproposals_tpc/?postversion=2008061113

Posted by: theo | September 27, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am

Adultery is one of the 10 commandments just like murder! Show me any place in the bible where they are weighted any differently from the other 8 commandments!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Obama and McCain did well. McCain certainly didnt mop the floor with Obama has many republicans thought he would. And this was supposed to be McCains debate topic. I believe both mislead on what they can do giving the current economic crisis. McCain not looking at or directly addressing Obama did not impress me. Obama sounded more presidential to me. I think McCain = past and Obama = future. I also think McCain and Bush’s idea of isolating countries with no direct talks has proven not to work and McCain will continue this policy. This Independent will support Obama

Posted by: CW | September 27, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

earmarks cost 18 billion dollars. w’s tax cuts for rich cost 250 billion. do the math. red republican math never add up.

Posted by: theo | September 27, 2008, 7:17 am 7:17 am

As a POW, McCain gave out more than “name, rank, and serial number!” McCain gave the enemy the location of his base as well as the target he was going to bomb. He also told them his father was the famous Admiral McCain. In return, for giving out confidential, classified information in violation of the US military Code of Conduct, McCain was given preferential treatment by his captors. Upon McCain’s POW release and return to the states, within 1 month McCain divorced his first wife, Carol (she was a former model), because in the 3rd year of her loyal waiting for her POW husband and father of their 3 children to return, on Christmas eve while in route to deliver Christmas presents to family friends she was injured in a car wreck that required 20 operations and left her with weight gain and a limp. In total violation of biblical teaching, that states flatly that divorce is allowable only for adultery, McCain ditched Carol and married Cindi; hence, McCain and Cindi are committing adultery before our eyes. Bristol Palin, the daughter of McCain’s VP nominee, is an unwed, teenage pregnant mother having committed adultery in violation of Biblical teaching. McCain-Palin=Adultery First! McCain-Palin=Broker than the 10 commandments! Too bad McCain-Palin actions are in direct contrast to their Christian right-wing holier than thou attitudes and policies.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

The most significant change that Obama/Biden will bring to the White House is leadership that actually leads, by changing our government’s strategies and culture so that they have a better fit to the global economy. Obama has an excellent ability to shape a strategic vision of a realistic and attractive future that binds us together as Americans and focuses our energy toward super ordinate goals as a nation. Obama stands alone as the candidate who can frame messages around a grand purpose with emotional appeal that captivates the best in us. Transformational leaders not only talk about a vision; they enact it. They walk the talk by stepping outside the executive suite and doing things that symbolize the vision, the way that Obama performed during the primaries and the way he has run a STELLAR overall campaign. Obama stands alone as the candidate best equipped to demonstrate a Can Do attitude with an image of honesty, trust, and integrity. OBAMA IS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! OBAMA 08; Yes We Can

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

OBAMA IS LEADING! In the polls, in history, in new voter registration, in fundraising, in campaign management, by every metric possible! Conventional wisdom has always said that you can determine how a president will lead by observing how he leads his campaign and the decision he made in picking his vice presidential nominee! Obama/Biden 08, real leadership for a new generation! What a STELLAR campaign being run by an incredible young, American leader! Go OBAMA/BIDEN

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

Republicans are for PRIVATIZING WEALTH while SOCIALIZING THE BAD DEBT mistakes of the fatcats!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Abortion must remain as a private matter between a woman and her God. The government has no business criminalizing her no more than it should criminalize MCCAIN for his adultery! A sin is a sin. However, no one is really sure whether abortion is indeed a sin or not. Fact is, research shows that abortions decrease in regions where comprehensive sex education and support care are taught and offered. Fact is, Palin/McCain are against such education. Fact is, ALASKA HAS THE HIGHEST ABORTION RATE IN THE USA!!!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

FIDELITY is a true American value! INFIDELITY has plagued our politics for too long. Face reality, Obama does not suffer from the INFIDELITY PLAGUE! He actually loves Michelle and his two daughters. No one in America doubts that Barack and Michelle radiate that good old time kinda love! That’s what I wouldn’t mind looking at for the next 4 years! Not 72 year old McCain and his Pre-nup wife! Not Failing, the pork barrel queen in lipstick, her underage, unwed, pregnant daughter.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

White privilege is when you can attend four different colleges in six years like Sarah Palin did (one of which you basically failed out of, then returned to after making up some coursework at a community college), and no one questions your intelligence or commitment to achievement, whereas a person of color who did this would be viewed as unfit for college, and probably someone who only got in in the first place because of affirmative action.
White privilege is being able to be a gun enthusiast and not make people immediately scared of you. White privilege is being able to have a husband who was a member of an extremist political party that wants your state to secede from the Union, and whose motto was “Alaska first,” and no one questions your patriotism or that of your family
“I don’t know why they’re trying to paint this [legislative investigation] as a Democratic partisan attack,” said state Sen. Wielechowski. “The thing I constantly remind people of is: Democrats didn””t push this. You know who pushed it? It was the Republicans. This is the thing people conveniently forget now. There were no Democrats out there screaming for an investigation.”
The House Judiciary Committee vote to endorse the issuance of the subpoenas included five Republicans and two Democrats.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-troopergate21-2008sep21,0,2158301.story?page=2

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:26 am 7:26 am

It’s hilarious how the gullible, lost, misled republicans want to create an ethics scandal through fabricated, stretched, associations on Obama while their VP candidate, Sarah Failin, is actually under ETHICS violation investigation and John McCain was found guilty of gross poor judgment in his KEATING 5 scandal! GET REAL! OBAMA/BIDEN have no ethics problems. On the other hand, your candidates really have some serious crap to deal with. OBAMA/BIDEN for real leadership!!!!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Katie Couric earned my trust with this interview. I have a whole new respect for her and her shows. Katie is the new Walter Kronkite, the most trusted voice in America!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

McCain you old pimp. SHAME ON YOU!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

I thought John wasnt going to this debate because he had to put the country first?
Dem or Rep…Doesnt matter my sheeple friends the big bankers are taking funny money derivatives and buying us out of our home and land anyway.

Posted by: PalinIsAHottie | September 27, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

My state, Texas, borders Mexico. That doesn’t make me a foreign policy expert. Sarah Failing doesn’t sound well educated. I’m puzzled as to why McCain choose her for VP. Especially since McCain is 72 with cancer. I’m voting for Obama.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am

Sen. McCain keeps talking about his experiences and about Sen. Obama’s unexperiences on most of the questions. Give me a break. Just answer the questions, what’s so hard. that’s what the debate for. this was just wasting tax payers money and time with no real answers to the questions. an experience person that is a heartbeat away and really love this country is not going to choose un-experience VP. what the un-experience VP can do when he/she becomes P.

Posted by: Lea | September 27, 2008, 7:34 am 7:34 am

Katie Couric, you asked excellent questions and followed up well. This interview shows that McCain is a weak, wimp of a man to pimp this woman the way he has done. It is truly sad. Sarah is in no way ready for the national stage or the Vice Presidency. McCain should truly be ASHAMED of himself for what he has done and tried to ram down America’s throat!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

What a decrepit joke has been forced on the nation by the Bush/Mcain/Failing ticket! Every week its some new, erratic, self-serving deception foisted by the 72-year old con artist. The old pimp, he literally discriminates against Sarah Failing before our eyes, by ordering her to be treated differently than the other candidates. Sarah is so un-prepared, it’s ridiculous! She is naiveté in full bloom. Really, it’s just sad, quite sad and pathetic.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am

Obama was rude by interrupting McCain while Macain didn’t do the same to Obama.. That was just pushy, arrogant and clueless on Obama’s part..

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am

He threw a John McCain sounds even worse than throwing Hail Mary passes! Oh my God, he threw a John McCain at us. I cannot describe the desperation tactics of the McCain/Failing ticket any other way. Lord help us all, McCain is abusing the Hail Mary with this VP pick of Sarah Failing!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Obama was like a robot..professorial..just words..no meaning..the American people will figure out that he is a an empty suit..

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Why do you say is a lie about the tax,Is obama president.Has he implemented the tax.Abc lies.All our eggs are in one basket.IRAQ,IRAQ.WE have lost every thing over iraq war.

Posted by: david | September 27, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

Obama will no fight for America..he is a weak, empty suit..he is always looking for appeasing the enemies of this country.

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

Tears and more tears… The big, bad, bogeyman Obama was rude to the sweet, cute, cuddley little bitty Johnnie boy. Gimme a break. McCain needs to take his filibustering butt back to the senate and hope he gets re-elected. He must be held accountable for his erratic behaviors. Political stunts every other weak, such as canceling the debate and then showing up with wet britches just doesn’t cut it! McChicken is a wimp with a Napolean complex! The usual, little man syndrome!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

If you tax businesses they will leave this country..Obama is wrong again.

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

He threw a McCain = another term for TEMPTER TANTRUMS!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Ess, then why have all the businesses left the country under Bush/Cheney/McCain/Failing???

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

The Obama Missouri Political Truth Squad supported by the police and government officials is an unconstitutional action. It reminds people of Hitler and the Nazis of World War II. The truth squad is prejudging persons by saying that only Senator Obama tells the truth, doesn‘t sway from his position and definitely never changes his mind. That in itself is a lie. We all know that Senator Obama distorts the truth and that Senator Obama lies.
All person have a constitutional right to talk and print criticisms about anything, including Senator Obama. We all have a right to our opinions whether the Missouri Ethics Commission likes it or not. It is Senator Obama’s responsibility to prove that people are telling lies about his character and affiliations. People know the truth about Senator Obama and it seems that the truth squad would not know the truth if it fell on them.
The Missouri Ethics Commission is not above the BILL OF RIGHTS of the AMERICAN CONSTITUTION. Bill of Rights Amendment I:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The above includes The Missouri Ethics Commission. The Missouri Ethics Commission does not observe THE BILL OF RIGHTS and The Missouri Ethics Commission is guilty of unconstitutional acts.
The Attorney General should start immediate action to stop the unconstitutional acts in Missouri. Any one citizen or group of citizens can file suit against The Missouri Ethics Commission and any official usurping The Bill Of Rights.
Missouri returns to slavery and Obama leads the way.
http://www.kmov.com/video/index.html?nvid=285793&shu=1

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Republicans speak as though the threats posed by global warming and climate change are nonexistent. Keep in mind that the stone age did not end because of a lack of stones; in like manner, our dependence on fossil fuels will not end because of a shortage of oil. Leadership is required, such as the leadership demonstrated by Obama. Furthermore, the space program, from Gemini through Apollo to Neil Armstrong setting foot on the moon, began as a pie in the sky. Real leadership made it a reality. Exxon Mobil markets itself as an ENERGY company. In actuality, they are merely an oil and gas company. If they truly viewed themselves as an energy company, they would have plowed a much greater profit into acquisition of alternative energy companies. The alternative energy technology is more developed and functional than the un-informed realize. However, Exxon used the bulk of its profits to buy back its own stock. This reflects short term thinking. Think out of the box, man! Through a combination of government working together with business, a whole new set of opportunities quickly emerges under an Obama/Biden administration. A good example of how government, in this case NASA, can work together with industry was the new swimsuits revealed at the Beijing Olympics. The suits were designed by NASA and Speedo and instrumental in the number of world records set. OBAMA/BIDEN 08

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Obama was not well-versed at all in the debate. He stuttered throughout, and called Senator McCain “Jim” and “Tim.”
I am a liberal Democrat, but cannot vote for someone who has written only two bills and has one of the worst congressional attendance records.
Obama also has the dead eyes of someone with Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Posted by: SP | September 27, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Obama has no foreign policy experience..he has never been to South America..and he dares speak of Venezuela,,what a looser..

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Federal Bailouts (so far):
$8,900,000,000 IndyMac
$30,000,000,000 Bear Stearns
$85,000,000,000 AIG
$200,000,000,000 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
on top of $9,000,000,000,000 debt and Bush is seeking $700,000,000,000 more to bail out the fatcats! wow!
Who do you think will pay?
Republicans love to BORROW and spend! Hmmmmm..we”ll sell some I.O.Us (govt bonds) to get all this money, right? China is the leading purchaser now, right? Our debt is staggering, right? When our credit cards get maxed out, no one wants to give any more credit, right?

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

I you increase taxes on businesses the exodus from America will accelerate…Obama is wrong one more time..

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

America lost its relationship with Venezuela because Bush/McCain refuse to talk with our enemies. In the meantime, Russia is talking with our enemies and forming new alliances. Are you republican robots truly as ignorant, stupid and illogical as you sound?

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

For those of you playing the class warfare game.. People that make 200k DO pay more already. Obama want’s even more then that.
At 200k the effective federal tax rate is 33%! For the math challenged out there that is $66,000 to the Federal government. I’m sorry but that is plenty as it is!
I agree with John McCain. We need to cut wasteful spending in the Government. Not add MORE social programs to it!

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

It”s really about a difference in philosophy. The republicans have it backwards! They insist on de-regulating business while regulating individual’s bedrooms, women’s uterus’s, as well as all civil liberties. On the other hand, democrats regulate business (so that we don’t have to bail out AIG’s at taxpayer expense…don’t have ENRON’s) while protecting individual civil liberties! Democrats are for CHOICE in all matters; whereas, republicans are for more torture – Abu Ghraib – Guantanamo – killing – Lying – slander – Denial lack of accountability – SPIN baby SPIN! McCain/Failing for more pork barrel pigs in lipstick!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

CommonSense – no we lost our relationship with Venezuala because they elected a Marxist dictator that is against everything our counry stands for.
If the only way to get cozy with him is to elect another Marxist I’ll just have to pass.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

Dani -
I would like it better if McCain would call Obama “Barack”, just like he calls Jim Leher “Jim” instead of “Mr. Leher”.
In other words, you can view this as an insult from either direction. In any case, each is choosing to address the other for effect, seeking to diminish the other in some way. It is so silly.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

cut $18 billion in infrastructure spending, give tax breaks of $300 billion to businesses that ship jobs overseas… republican robots here are the reason we are economically in the hole needing a bailout!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

26-28 years of experience. come on now, with 20 years of experience, Sen.McCain still couldn’t be a Republican Presidential nominee. on year 2000 Sen.McCain still not as experience as G.W.Bush, eventough G.W.Bush was younger. It took Sen.McCain another 8 years of experience to become R.Pressidential nominee. why does it take so many years? is there no other good nominee from Republican between age 40-60? Where are the younger generation? Do they all don’t have enough experience for President of United States? Do they all need to wait for another 8 years or wait till 70+ years old so they can claim that they have tons of experience compare to younger Presidential Nominee from Democrat?

Posted by: Lea | September 27, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

nobama :
Statistically, women live longer than men. And you cannot say McCain has led an easy life, or one without stress. AND if you notice, President’s age faster than the norm once they get in office.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

CommonSense – you’re lying again!
The collapse of AIG, Freddy and Fannie is due precisely due to government intervention by Democrats (Dodd, Frank and Obama). They attempted social engineering by coercing these institutions to loan money to poor people (subprime) that couldn’t afford to make the payments got us here.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Michael, the marxist dictator found an opening with his people to rise to power because of the greed displayed by Exxon Mobil under the Bush/Cheney regime. Bush/Cheney were so intoxicated by the profits Exxon was raking in for its shareholders in America, they forgot about the impact on international stakeholder communities, such as Venezuela. The masses revolted, led by Chavez. This never would have happened under an “engaged” president!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

No more social programs..we need a spending freeze..lower taxes on businesses and stop appeasing the enemies of this country. By the way “CommonSense” doesn’t know anything about Venezuela..the reason the USA and Venezuela do not see eye to eye is that South America will not listen to anyone in this country anymore..so If you think Obama will charm Chavez..DREAM ON..

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

LETTER FROM VLADIMIR PUTIN TO AMERICA: We understand the Bush Doctrine, which says that any country can pre-emptively strike any other country whenever they desire, even for bogus, false reasons. Accordingly, we have put bombers in Venezuela to counter your “Bush” doctrine. We are thinking of even doing a pre-emptive strike on you; cause, we can show you better than we can tell you how DANGEROUS your “BUSH” doctrine is, okay? In the next couple of weeks, we will be playing some war games with Venezuela down in the Caribbean, so, don’t be alarmed. We’re just getting ready, that’s all.
Sincerely,
Vladimir
PS – this is not an attempt to influence your election

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Chuck :
McCain could not look at Obama because he has a problem with anger. He needed to keep his cool, and if he were to make eye contact he might go on a rant and start cursing. I am serious. He was very close to letting loose several times and if he had it would have been the end of him. Total meltdown.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Nice story but completly untrue. The masses voted for Chavez for the same reason you’re voting for Obama. They were spoon fed lies based on class warfare where they were convinced that anyone that made more money then they did were their enemy.
Sounds like you and Obama’s relationship to me.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

jb- McCain losing it?
Not hardly.
Obama was the one stuttering and interrupting. He wasn’t really looking at McCain as much as glaring at him.
He seemed very inept at all this.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

I guess the talking points memos went out early today, all the campaign drones disengenuously typing away on the blogs already…
The debate was somewhere near a tie, with no howlers or knock-out punches. Both tried to distort the other’s record a bit, and were evasive on some tough questions, but mainly it came down to honest differences in vision, worldview, and policy positions. I think most open-minded viewers will find themselves siding with the candidate who shared their views on the matters debated.

Posted by: Tom | September 27, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

I’ve heard this kind of stuff before.
What Obama doesn’t plan for is the hundreds of small business owners that will drop their company health insurance plans, (because of high taxes) and send their employees to Obama’s national health plan.
Obama is planning for 50 million uninsured. But it could be as high as 100 million after it is all said and done.
Your taxes WILL be raised. (There is no other way to do all of what Obama plans.)

Posted by: Angry Republic | September 27, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

$200,000 or %250,000 seriously when you make that much, I’m thinking it doesn’t matter… Let’d diss on something real here. McCain sounded like an old man the whole night. He kept going back to the same “statistics” and information. I felt like I was watching a man in a nursing home reminisce about his past. McCain wouldn’t even look at Obama the entire evening. How’s that going to work when he has to meet with leaders of foreign nations that he disagrees with? McCain is a washed up old goot.

Posted by: Julie | September 27, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Undecided doesn’t sound undecided to me.
Commonsense however does have common sense.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Oh yeah, McCain is REALLY educated??? What r u thinking. Sen. Obama looked/sounded presidential, had tons of facts at hand and if you make more than 200k per year, you SHOULD pay more of a % of you income for taxes than I have to. It’s unfair the system that is in place!

Posted by: monstermash | September 27, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Michael, clearly you are the typical republican who fears everything. You have no confidence in America, so, you want to put a fence around you and live in isolation. Obama won the debate on foreign policy and everyone saw it. Obama knows how to negotiate and doesn’t fear talking to our enemies. I understand why Bush/McCain have low self-esteem and so much fear. Both were beer drinking frat boys who scored in the bottom of their classes. Their low intelligence has made them behave as traitors. Heck, McCain even made between 20 – 30 propaganda videos for the enemy during his captivity.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Obama is an angry black man..period..

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

Wow the Marxists are out in force now..
You make too much money! Give it to me!
Maybe the reason you don’t make very much money is because your hands are always out waiting on someone else to take care of you. Listen, the “rich” already pay MORE then their fair share. We need smaller government not bigger. The real answer is to cut spending not increase taxes/spending.
Some statistics for you all:
Top 5% pay 53.25% of all income taxes (Down from 2000 figure: 56.47%). The top 10% pay 64.89% (Down from 2000 figure: 67.33%). The top 25% pay 82.9% (Down from 2000 figure: 84.01%). The top 50% pay 96.03% (Down from 2000 figure: 96.09%). The bottom 50%? They pay a paltry 3.97% of all income taxes. The top 1% is paying more than ten times the federal income taxes than the bottom 50%! And who earns what? The top 1% earns 17.53 (2000: 20.81%) of all income. The top 5% earns 31.99 (2000: 35.30%). The top 10% earns 43.11% (2000: 46.01%); the top 25% earns 65.23% (2000: 67.15%), and the top 50% earns 86.19% (2000: 87.01%) of all the income.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

McCain/Failing ticket is a vote for more of Bush economics, more of Bush foreign policy (“The Bush Doctrine”), and more Bush ethics of denial, secrecy, and lack of accountability. Expect more Enrons, bailouts, and increased debt to China. Long gone will be the days when Bill Clinton created a surplus for the government. Heck, McCain brings a VP nominee already embroiled in investigation for abuse of power. His solution is to berate the investigative process, which was started before she was picked to be his nominee. Sarah Failin has learned all she needs to know, can you say EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE? What a Crockpot of fecal matter!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

Sarah Failing, people who never blink are scary people!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

Chad:
“One more thing. If you’re having health insurance issues, Obama will do MUCH more for you than McCain would.”
You do not know a thing about the heath care industry. Obama will put more tax dollars into an already over inflated high costing industry. The cost of health care is the inflated cost for prescription drugs, inflated hospital and inflated doctor costs.
Moreover, it is the results of prescription drugs causing more health problems then the prescription drugs can cure. Obama will have to increase taxes to pay for more inflation in the health care industry. The AMA will fight socialized medicine unless socialized medicine would give the AMA everything that it wants. LOL with the health care problem since health care in the USA cause more problems with health care. If that sounds like vicious circle, it is.
McCain/Palin. Washington will eat junior senator Obama alive and Joe Biden will be a backdoor president.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

The only thing I fear is people that try to get elected by playing off the class warfare card.
Poor, Middle and Rich are all citizens.
To get one class to hate the other all in the name of getting elected is dispicable.
People like you fall for it hook, line and sinker.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

McCain is not Bush just like Obama is not JFK.

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

OBAMA IS FOR THE FREE MARKETS OF CAPITALISM, constrained by the conscience of sensible government regulation! Obama understands that the government is just as essential to capitalism as is the consumer; and, he understands the government’s role to enhance and create new industries and markets when the private sector is failing to do so. For example, Obama sees that the markets are not “laissez faire capitalism” when it comes to our energy industries. This is evident by the abnormally high gas prices that are hurting the consumer. He understands far better than Bush/McCain that our way to independence is through alternative energies, such as FUEL CELL TECHNOLOGY, BIO-MASS, BIO-DIESEL, WIND, SOLAR, BIO-THERMAL TECHNOLOGIES. Obama knows how to unleash NASA again, unfettered by the sinister repression of free scientific thought, the BUSH/McCain sought to SILENCE and edit the scientists. Obama respects the opinions of ECONOMISTS, unlike Bush/McCain/Palin, who tried to pander with gas holiday gimmicks. OBAMA 08, YES WE CAN!!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

He bet on Iraq war. then Sarah Palin. then 700B bailout plan. Looks how experience he is and look how he used his experience on his bet in the past. Do you trust your next President that like to put a bet wihout proper thinking?

Posted by: Lea | September 27, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Michael -
Up early are we?
I didn’t say he lost it. The reason he didn’t lose it is that he did not get personal by looking Obama in the eye. Once John gets personal he gets ugly. Yes Obama speaks in spurts as he assembles his thoughts, and one gets the idea he is parsing his talking points, stringing them together. What would you do, come up with something completely fresh and new every time? McCain does the same thing but in bigger hunks. Last night he repeated many of the same things he says at his Rallys. But that’s not what I am talking about. I am talking about the way each candidate chose to address each other, the camera, the crowd, and the moderator, for better or worse. Obama looked at McCain. McCain avoided looking at Obama. No reason to be overanalytical, but if you have a theory as to motives, please share it.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Adultery is one of the 10 commandments just like murder! Show me any place in the bible where they are weighted any differently from the other 8 commandments!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

As a POW, McCain gave out more than “name, rank, and serial number!” McCain gave the enemy the location of his base as well as the target he was going to bomb. He also told them his father was the famous Admiral McCain. In return, for giving out confidential, classified information in violation of the US military Code of Conduct, McCain was given preferential treatment by his captors. Upon McCain’s POW release and return to the states, within 1 month McCain divorced his first wife, Carol (she was a former model), because in the 3rd year of her loyal waiting for her POW husband and father of their 3 children to return, on Christmas eve while in route to deliver Christmas presents to family friends she was injured in a car wreck that required 20 operations and left her with weight gain and a limp. In total violation of biblical teaching, that states flatly that divorce is allowable only for adultery, McCain ditched Carol and married Cindi; hence, McCain and Cindi are committing adultery before our eyes. Bristol Palin, the daughter of McCain’s VP nominee, is an unwed, teenage pregnant mother having committed adultery in violation of Biblical teaching. McCain-Palin=Adultery First! McCain-Palin=Broker than the 10 commandments! Too bad McCain-Palin actions are in direct contrast to their Christian right-wing holier than thou attitudes and policies.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

CommonSense – are you just a mindless droid? “OBAMA 08, YES WE CAN” that’s a bumper sticker – not human dialog.
Marxism does NOT work. Taking from the rich and redistributing it to the poor does NOT work.
Forcing companies like Fannie and Freddie to gaurantee loans from high risk borrowers all in the name of “affordable housing” does NOT work.
These are all Obama’s plans.. If you like them so much I’m sure Cuba would take you in.. It’s their plan too.

Posted by: Michael | September 27, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

Did anyone else heard why the economic meeting held this week when into a complete meltdown. It was because of Obama inability to chair the meeting. The democratic leaders had Obama chair the meeting so they can come with a statement saying that Obama took charge and show strong leadership in the economic meeting with the President. Unfortunately, it did not go as planned. It was said that Obama started the meeting confused, using wrong facts, and not able to get his words out. All attendees were promised not to say anything about what happen in the meeting. It you noticed no one from the democratic party that attended the meeting mentioned any things about Obama’s performance, chairing the meeting. If Obama had performance well, you better believe the party would have shared it with the media.
How can I get or hear the full script of the economic meeting?

Posted by: Sally298 | September 27, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

McCain is not Bush. that is correct. but remember 8 yrs ago, McCain was worse than Bush. Bush is the Rep. Nominee. so do you think McCain today is better than McCain 8 years ago? what he did in the last 8 years that make him better than Obama?

Posted by: Lea | September 27, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

CommoSense is really for the fist stage of the new Socialism, first “State Capitalism”..jut like what Obama is proposing more government controls and social programs..among them a huge state agency to regulate your medical issues..then watch and see the final nail in the coffin..the USA will be another socialist state.

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Washington will eat junior senator Obama alive and Joe Biden will be a backdoor president.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Basically, America has lost its farming base and its manufacturing base. Driving our economic growth for the last eight years has been the FINANCE BUBBLE, credit and mortgages, coupled with exotic derivatives and other risky financial instruments. We need a leader who can inspire America with a vision that results in Americans actually MANUFACTURING something of value for the world other than EXOTIC FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. OBAMA stands alone as the candidate taking us in that direction.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

We witnessed last night that Barack Obama is completely out of his league. It was a massive embarrassment. John McCain was informed, experienced, and provided specifics whereas Obama performed his usual smoke and mirrors routine, lathering the crowd up into generalalities, talking like he’s done this for years, and providing absolutely NOTHING of substance. Read the transcript folks…it’s an embarrassment to our nation. He said nothing.

Posted by: Jim | September 27, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Last night, Obama did not look well and a little old.

Posted by: willie | September 27, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Let me begin by saying yes there was winner last eve. In fact, a clear cut one! McCain, McCain!!!! When will the society really hear about the connection to Obama and William Ayers? Do we want a President who breaks bread with a homegrown terrorist? I don’t!!!

Posted by: Derek | September 27, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

Obama has no experience,all he does is TALK..TALK..Obama is way over his head..

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Obama will do anything to get in the WH and say anything to get in the WH. He knows that any miss step will be easily buried by a media that is trying to elect him.We won’t she this article anywhere but here. If you think Mccain will follow another Presidents failing policies then you have not looked hard enough at both canidates. Mccain does whats best for the country. Obama spins it to look political because he can’t believe that anyone would put country first.

Posted by: Eric | September 27, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

John McCain and Linsdey Graham got it wrong! There is no greater honor than running for President of the United States of America (the POTUS). Erratically suspending your campaign, breaking your agreement to debate this Friday, and running away from the POTUS to hide in your old job of 26 years, shows a lack of respect and total disdain for the competency of your former colleagues. Furthermore, it’s clear that you did it because you were un-prepared to debate, afraid that Obama was going to defeat you one on one, as the polls show that he did, and that you are unable to multi-task! You momentarily abandoned the most important, patriotic honor anyone can hope to have, seeking the POTUS as your party’s nominee. Once again, you rejected the will of the American people for the debate this Friday in support of your own erratic agenda; and, then turned around and showed up anyway, just like the FLIP-FLOPPER that you are. You are not running for Senate re-election, McCain. However, in running for the POTUS, your action was a gimmick and distraction, from both the work of the Senate as well as the Office of the POTUS.
McCain, you are a distraction to both. Please take your Circus act, with all your lipstick, pigs, moose, 13 cars, 11 houses, 2 wives (Carol in the eyes of God and Cindi the adulteress), power abusing, de-regulator, Phil Gramm nation of whiners, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, unwed teenage pregnancy, ethics investigation, stick the $1,000 rape kit to the victim in Wasilla, bunch on your Bridge Outta Here. John McCain, sit down and shut up!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Truman gave us the “Fair Deal”, Roosevelt gave us the “New Deal”, and, if elected, Obama WILL BE the “Big Deal”.
Frankly, I prefer someone with a smaller ego investment, as my life has been filled with so many BIG EGOS, telling me what was good for me. But I have succeeded in spite of them, and I think this nation can too.
Nobama ’08
Lemmings for Obama.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Finish this sentence:
ess is an angry ______ _________

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

JB..Obama is angry black man, an empty suit..no experience and weak.

Posted by: ess | September 27, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Hmmmm…..whats the best saying to use here….the hurt dog makes the most noise…the empty wagon rattles the loudest?? either one works. On this board, all the initial outrage seems to be coming from the right. No one lost or won that debate last night, however, there is an honest shift towards Obama in the last few weeks that will continue over the 5 weeks because; he has a stronger better funded campaign and the country is naturally leaning to the left now after 7 1/2 of the worst U.S. years since the Civil War.

Posted by: Neu | September 27, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Give me one good reason why an individual or couple who get a good education, work hard, and contribute to the American economy should constantly be penalized by higher taxes like Obama proposes just to support the dead beats or those who don’t think they make enough money because they didn’t do what it takes to make more of themselves. I’m sick of the dems telling me we have to level the playing field – I have no problem helping the truly disabled, sick and aged, but not the rest. I think all give away programs should have a lifetime limit on them – like 3 or 4 years and stop those who make a living off those who contribute.

Posted by: Ravenhair | September 27, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

John McCain and Linsdey Graham got it wrong! There is no greater honor than running for President of the United States of America (the POTUS). Erratically suspending your campaign, breaking your agreement to debate this Friday, and running away from the POTUS to hide in your old job of 26 years, shows a lack of respect and total disdain for the competency of your former colleagues. Furthermore, it’s clear that you did it because you were un-prepared to debate, afraid that Obama was going to defeat you one on one, as the polls show that he did, and that you are unable to multi-task! You momentarily abandoned the most important, patriotic honor anyone can hope to have, seeking the POTUS as your party’s nominee. Once again, you rejected the will of the American people for the debate this Friday in support of your own erratic agenda; and, then turned around and showed up anyway, just like the FLIP-FLOPPER that you are. You are not running for Senate re-election, McCain. However, in running for the POTUS, your action was a gimmick and distraction, from both the work of the Senate as well as the Office of the POTUS.
McCain, you are a distraction to both. Please take your Circus act, with all your lipstick, pigs, moose, 13 cars, 11 houses, 2 wives (Carol in the eyes of God and Cindi the adulteress), power abusing, de-regulator, Phil Gramm nation of whiners, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, unwed teenage pregnancy, ethics investigation, stick the $1,000 rape kit to the victim in Wasilla, bunch on your Bridge Outta Here. John McCain, sit down and shut up!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

CommonSense needs screen name change and NOW! John McCain returned to Washington this week to do the job he was elected to do. U.S Senator with a need to work on the crisis impacting our country. Barry Obama doesn’t want to be a U.S Senator and has spent his entire time as a U.S Senator running for President. Ol Barry could not be interrupted to ACTUALLY DO HIS JOB AS SENATOR and put the campaign aside for a few days to work on this crisis.
Makes sense to me…and millions more.

Posted by: Jim | September 27, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Republicans are for PRIVATIZING WEALTH while SOCIALIZING THE BAD DEBT mistakes of the fatcats!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Obama and McCain are missing the best way to tax. The flat tax is the best way to tax, but both are part of the political system and there will be no real change in Washington.
The politicians will play with their ideas and corruptions and you the taxpayer will pay the bills.
Washington will eat junior senator Obama alive and Joe Biden will be a backdoor president.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

It”s really about a difference in philosophy. The republicans have it backwards! They insist on de-regulating business while regulating individual’s bedrooms, women’s uterus’s, as well as all civil liberties. On the other hand, democrats regulate business (so that we don’t have to bail out AIG’s at taxpayer expense…don’t have ENRON’s) while protecting individual civil liberties! Democrats are for CHOICE in all matters; whereas, republicans are for more torture – Abu Ghraib – Guantanamo – killing – Lying – slander – Denial lack of accountability – SPIN baby SPIN! McCain/Failing for more pork barrel pigs in lipstick!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Did anyone else heard why the economic meeting held this week when into a complete meltdown. It was because of Obama inability to chair the meeting. The democratic leaders had Obama chair the meeting so they can come with a statement saying that Obama took charge and show strong leadership in the economic meeting with the President. Unfortunately, it did not go as planned. It was said that Obama started the meeting confused, using wrong facts, and not able to get his words out. All attendees were promised not to say anything about what happen in the meeting. It you noticed no one from the democratic party that attended the meeting mentioned any things about Obama’s performance, chairing the meeting. If Obama had performance well, you better believe the party would have shared it with the media.
How can I get or hear the full script of the economic meeting?

Posted by: Sally298 | September 27, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

If you think Bush is bad, just wait until Obama gets into the White House. Bush is a big government Republican and Obama is nothing more than your typical tax-and-spend liberal Democrat. Hey, if you think about it Obama has more in common with Bush when it comes to the issue of spending. Hmmm… Perhaps McCain should start running ads making that point. Well, guess what? The bill is coming due and I’m not talking about the $700 billion bailout for Wall Street. There is a $53 trillion nightmare over the horizon in the form of medicare and other entitlement commitments. Now, how are we going to afford socialized medicine and all the other promises Obama is making? McCain may not be a conservative in the mold of Reagan, but he does believe in common sense spending and limited government. I’ll take McCain over Obama any day.

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

It is clear that MacCain won the debate big time. Obama looked like a lost little school kid who just froze before the exam.

Posted by: Joe | September 27, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Sally -
That was George W. Bush’s meeting.
They met at the White House (Thats where our presidents live and work).
If you want to see a transcript you would have to get it from GWB. If it would make Obama look bad, you can bet he would show it to you. Why don’t you just pinch your nose with your fingers and hold your breath until he releases it?
Really – catch a clue

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

If republicans had their way, we would be required by law to follow all of the 10 commandments! Poor McCain wouldn’t have been able to exercise CHOICE to ditch his first wife, Carol, for non-adulterous reasons. Sarah Failing’s daughter and her under age lover would be jailed with a scarlet letter on her forehead!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

The most significant change that Obama/Biden will bring to the White House is leadership that actually leads, by changing our government’s strategies and culture so that they have a better fit to the global economy. Obama has an excellent ability to shape a strategic vision of a realistic and attractive future that binds us together as Americans and focuses our energy toward super ordinate goals as a nation. Obama stands alone as the candidate who can frame messages around a grand purpose with emotional appeal that captivates the best in us. Transformational leaders not only talk about a vision; they enact it. They walk the talk by stepping outside the executive suite and doing things that symbolize the vision, the way that Obama performed during the primaries and the way he has run a STELLAR overall campaign. Obama stands alone as the candidate best equipped to demonstrate a Can Do attitude with an image of honesty, trust, and integrity. OBAMA IS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! OBAMA 08; Yes We Can

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

CommonSense is a looser..an Obama operative..How much are you getting pay?

Posted by: AC | September 27, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

OBAMA IS LEADING! In the polls, in history, in new voter registration, in fundraising, in campaign management, by every metric possible! Conventional wisdom has always said that you can determine how a president will lead by observing how he leads his campaign and the decision he made in picking his vice presidential nominee! Obama/Biden 08, real leadership for a new generation! What a STELLAR campaign being run by an incredible young, American leader! Go OBAMA/BIDEN

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Obama is a bastard child..How do you like that CommonSense..

Posted by: AC | September 27, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

CommonSense…most of the people who post on here regularly know you are a lefty shill for the Democrats. Your rants go ignored for the most part. You flat out get it wrong so why don’t you go back to guarding the keys to the room where Obama has tied up Reverand Wright, Bill Ayers, and most of his other shady Chicago connections. You can let them all out after election day.

Posted by: Jim | September 27, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

ess is a snaggle-toothed dwarf with one blue eye and one green eye, and IQ of 60 and 20/40 vision who grew up in an ashram in colorado after traveling with gay gypsy parents from Nova Scotia.
Anybody can make stuff up and call people names.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Will someone correct this Rookie? Whenever he says he will cut taxes on 95% of Americans I cringe because no one corrects him-About 45% of Americans do not pay anything in taxes!!!! How do you cut nothing?
Obama, how about being honest to the American people. This is the country of opportunity! Stay in school, learn some skills, set some goals and with hard work good things will come. Pouring money into the system or taking from the wealthy will not help. It creates a system of “expectation or entitlement”. Wake up America!

Posted by: Suzanne | September 27, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

What many extreme evangelical Christians fail to realize is that Obama is truly a real Christian. The Dobson group mocked Obama by caricaturing him as an Uncle Ben’s rice or Aunt Jemima type character on a waffle box, which was sold at their function. Many may have seen the video discussing the box on The View, as Hasselbeck spoke out against Obama racism. This demeaning act showed that real Christianity is not exhibited by Dobson’s group. Jesus spoke of the Good Samaritan, as a clear example that racism is a weakness, not strength. In our economy, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis race, national origin, sex, age, and disability. Racism is illegal, un-patriotic, anti-Christian, sinful behavior, according to any and all Christian bibles!
Barack and Michelle truly love God as Christians and have a marriage that reflects real Christian and American values. Their cute marriage and precious daughters are an inspiration for all Americans and represent America’s best. Together with the Christian love between Joe and Jill Biden, Obama/Biden will govern with fairness and God will bless America as a beacon of hope for the whole world.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Families making less than $250K/year won’t really get any tax break. Those who are over $100K will see very little if any tax break. Those earning less than $100K are already paying a smaller percentage, so the total tax cut they’ll see will be tiny.
What liberals fail to understand is that raising taxes will slow down the economy, which will raise unemployment. So, first, a family earning $60K/year will save $100 on taxes. Second, someone in that family will lose their job and their income will drop to $30K. Who wins?
Obama will raise taxes on businesses. As a result, companies will just ship more jobs overseas where taxes are more reasonable. The end result, again, is a slowing economy and higher unemployment. The tax base will decrease and the total tax revenue will go down, despite higher percentage rates. What will the democrats do in the next election then? Raise taxes some more?
Don’t believe in Obama’s communist propaganda (rob the rich, give to the poor) – everybody looses in the end under Marxist regimes.
Vote McCain/Palin!

Posted by: Andrew | September 27, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Obama is a Socialist. Take from those who have and give to those who don’t. It’s that simple folks.

Posted by: John | September 27, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

commonsence…you really need some help…seriously !!!!

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Jim – right on – you have it right. McCain put aside his campaign and risked criticism to do the right thing – to do his job – something Obama doesn’t even know how to do. I also found out that at the meeting with Bush, Obama was totally lost and had no understanding of what was going on – he just sat there looking dumbfounded. We haven’t heard about it because the other Democrates at the meeting have been doing damage control so that this doesn’t get leaked to the press or anyone else. I truly don’t understand people who can’t see through this guy – he’s worthless. McCain was not my first choice, but he’s certainly a far better choice than someone who admits on national television he’s a faith other than what he says and worse yet, proposes to strip us of any ability to defend ourselves. Do a search of You Tube – Obama Military – it will scare you to death. Putin is licking his chops.

Posted by: Ravenhair49 | September 27, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Palin’s 2 ethics investigations, and out of control daughter (who was statutorily raped) fit McCain’s erratic, poor judgment character>>>generally, Republicans view laws and rules as something to bend or skirt (pardon the pun) around. The McCain-Palin ticket is the biggest insult ever…ever…ever>>>WHAT A JOKE!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Do we really want a 72 year old “high risk” gambler, who sings “bomb, bomb Iran”…who reacts without questioning that “we are all Georgians”…who violated the military code of conduct as a POW by giving more than name, rank and serial number (he gave the location of his target and his base in return for preferential treatment by his captors)… who divorced his first wife and mother of his children, Carol, not for biblically allowed reasons (adultery) but merely because, while waiting faithfully as a POW wife, she was in a car wreck on Christmas Eve and when McCain returned 2 years later, she wasn’t quite the “fashion model” anymore (she gained some weight and walked with a limp, So much for “in sickness or in health,” right?, who was found guilty of GROSS POOR JUDGMENT in the Keating 5 scandal, who erratically suspends his campaign for the POTUS because he is un-prepared and scared…
Sadly, McCain’s life story is that of a morally bankrupt individual and he is NOT qualified to be president nor commander in chief.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

So $200,000 vs. $250,000? Big whoop. It’s still about double what I make and it’s definitely rich. Obama is right. McCain is wrong. And for those of you misinformed idiots who claim that “Obama is a socialist” – remember that it’s Bush and the GOP who are trying to socialize the financial infastructure right now. LOL

Posted by: kimbers | September 27, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

WHAT A JOKE!
Posted by: CommonSense ..yes, you are

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

One of the reasons Obama did not want to attend the economic meeting, he did not want to be contacted with the bailout plan because it favor some of his old partners at ACORN which is under federal investigation. This information was undercover in the economic meeting, which upset most the republican leaders that attended. The bailout will allow 20% of the profit to be given to the group ACORN that Obama was once a lawyer for two years and work for. If the old bailout planned (with McCain forcing Obama to attend) had passed and once the people find out about the money going to ACORN and people learned of Obama associated with ACORN, then Obama could had said “I did not know about it being in the bailout plan and I was not part of those meeting that agreed with it.

Posted by: Sally298 | September 27, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

McCain is a socialist. He wants to nationalize major sectors of the US economy just like Chavez. Republicans want socialism for the rich and capitalism for the rest of us.

Posted by: James Moody | September 27, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Sally – that’s bullcrap and you are a liar. Thanks!

Posted by: balanced blade | September 27, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

CommonSense – you really need to change your screen name – please – anyone with an ounce of common sense can see through Obama – just another politician only worse – a ladder climbing politician who thinks he can skirt by because he talks well with a teleprompter in front of him.

Posted by: Ravenhair49 | September 27, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

When we went to war with Panama, we got Noriega and that was it. Only an idiot would try to change an entire regime, when, all ya had to do was pluck out Saddam as we did Noriega>>>if that really was the issue. The “surge” was not necessary, cause, the reduction in violence has been from the fact that we “hired” all of Saddam’s former party members (The Awakening). We could have done that without any troops. BUSH/MCCAIN/FAILIN are slap idiots!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Obama wants this country to be a Socialist nation..Why? so he can created many social programs that will rewards the ones among us that dare take no risks..he is for taxing the business that provide decent jobs and to appease the enemies of this country.

Posted by: AC | September 27, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Common Sense is a lefty liberal loon. Leave Sarah Palin’s family out of this!!!
Barry Obama has no judgment! It was exposed last night repeatedly!
Here’s a piece of common sense for you….your golden boy Sheik Al Barrack Hussein Obama is going back to Chicago defeated. He will probably resign frmo the U.S senate because he used that job only as a prop to get him to run for POTUS. Maybe a community league will hire him as a basketball coach…more in line with his resume anyway.

Posted by: Jim | September 27, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Suzanne -
I have a Republican sister who tells me she pays no taxes. I ask her how can that be, I pay tons of taxes why doesn’t she?
She says I make more money than her. Her husband owns a small business and she does the books. She assures me she does nothing illegal, and I believe her. My wife is a CPA and I asked her, she says yes that is possible. I don’t begrudge my sister. I went to college, she did not. We both started out the same in a good home of moderate income. She has mountains of debt. I have no debt and a pretty good nestegg to boot. Sometimes we cannot extrapolate our own situation to others. I do think someone has to pay taxes. Where would we be without civilization?

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Posted by: CommonSense ..i know you won’t reply to this because you are deaf, dumb and blind…but, seriously, do you actually believe the C R A P you type?…all kidding aside, i’m curious.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Why is jealousy considered a virtue? Why is what I and my wife make any of your concern? Do you not know that we don’t keep all we make. We spend thousands on gifts, and bonuses to family and friends. Why is that a problem of yours? Why should I have to give more to the poor. Why should I have to work longer hours? I already work so much that my 4 month son doesn’t even know who I am. Who of you put in 60-70 hours a week. I am the one that gives out paychecks. Not one of the poor gives somebody a paycheck. These butts don’t even have a skill. Except texting and using their cellphone. Thats not a skill, morons think otherwise.

Posted by: heavenlikethis | September 27, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

You’re all a bunch of morons. Do you really think any of you are going to change anyone else’s opinion on this board? Give a person a computer and they all think they’re great intellectuals and philosophers.
Get real, try not to have preconceived ideas and sit back and listen to these debates without prejudices. Then on November 4th make a decision.

Posted by: Jeff | September 27, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

LET ME REPEAT CLEARLY>>>The “surge” was not necessary, cause, the reduction in violence has been from the fact that we “HIRED” all of Saddam’s former party members (The Awakening).
We could have done that without any troops!!! It’s true
BUSH/MCCAIN/FAILIN are slap idiots!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

CommonSense you are a fool..DO NOT COMPARE PANAMA WITH IRAQ..you are another ignorant left winger.
Panama is a christian nation that didn’t pose a mortal threat to this country..have you forgotten about 9/11 you FOOL.

Posted by: AC | September 27, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Thanks Jeff – now scram.
Raving Hair – Why don’t you take the time to tell us what “meeting” you are talking about. Date, location.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

CommonSense..get out your dictionary, look up ” idiot”…go look in your mirror and take a pill. denial is your worst enemy.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

AC – you are so right. Think about it people – when the government keeps taxing business what do they do to make up for the loss to their bottomline – they make cuts. And where do they make the cuts – to their most costly expense – the payroll. That means many thousands of people loose their jobs and this trickles down to the smaller companies and across the economy. If you think we are headed for a recession now, vote Obama in and you will likely find yourself on the unemployment line.

Posted by: Ravenhair | September 27, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Irrespective of what we do with the taxes, the only long term solution for the Federal Budget is to reign in spending which is McCain’s forte.
In the past week, the Democrats have proven things are going to be business as usual by secret spending meetings and politicizing the market mess.
If they were truly smart they would try and get the focus off of that mess because its roots only lead back to them not their opponents.

Posted by: Sane American | September 27, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Imagine that, a governor with time on her hands to micro-manage the personnel file of an individual state trooper!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

CommonSense..you are making my 5 year old laugh..thank you !!!

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

McCain was the clear winner in my eyes. Obama is a rookie and shows no command of the topics. God help America if Obama is elected. Do we really want a socialist, far left leaning society?

Posted by: Arlene Pauly | September 27, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Since 1973, the US Supreme Court decision in Roe versus Wade has given choice to women about abortion as a private matter, exactly the same choice given to McCain to sin against his first wife, Carol, through adultery with his current wife, Cindi (Authority; King James Holy Bible on marriages in the eyes of God); exactly the same choice given to Bristol Palin to sin through adultery and unwed pregnancy (Authority; King James Holy Bible in the ten commandments).
Obama understands that, since 1973, Roe versus Wade is not broken and does not need to be fixed. There are much higher priority issues affecting the country right now than “unborn” children.
Even on that subject, research has clearly shown that Obama’s solution of comprehensive sex education and support care reduces the number of abortions, while abortions increased under Bush/McCain/Palin type policies.
Obama understands that, it is the “already born” children and their parents in the middle class, the largest group of Americans, that need jobs and tax breaks right now, not just the small minority that makes over $250,000 per year- only about 2% of households. ObamA/Biden = Fighting for the “the already born and unborn! ”McCain-Palin=Fighting for the “unborn” only… WHICH GROUP ARE YOU IN???

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

I’m not sure where everyone else lives in this country, but where I am from, anyone who makes over $100,000 is rich, so 200k or 250k: what the hell did McCain mean last night when he said he would be interested to see what Obama’s idea of “rich” is? I am a college educated-single woman, going to graduate school next year, and I will only see a salary of 200K or more if I dream really hard or marry rich, so sorry mr. McCain that YOUR idea of the average american income is 1/4 million dollars per year. McCain is a Joke, and his running mate is such a bad joke it’s no longer funny. In the words of John Stossel, GIVE ME A BREAK!

Posted by: Tiffany | September 27, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

Any of you Obama supporters heard your VP candidate Biden…he is a hoot…he is worst than Palin when it comes to “foot in mouth” disease!! In fact, Biden is McCain’s friend and he proves it by showing America what a jerk Obama is everytime he opens his mouth..I like Biden…he is a nice guy, but, a real “gaff” machine!! How come you Obama supporters don’t criticize Biden? Different strokes????

Posted by: mfmros | September 27, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

George Bush has been president for almost 8 years. His economic policy is the same as McCain’s – trickle down, minimal regulation.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Tiffany”’you almost had me until you said you were college educated…your words make me doubt you.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

TROOPERGATE – Trooper Mike Wooten was disciplined long before Palin took office as governor. A bipartisan committee of the Alaskan legislature voted 12 to 0 to investigate Palin after she fired Public Safety Commissioner Walter Monegan after it was learned that he had refused to fire the already disciplined Wooten who prior to his discipline had been involved in a messy divorce with Palin’s sister. The situation regarding Palin’s sister’s divorce and some inconsistent statements by Governor Palin call into question the real reasons for this firing. In fact, Governor Palin had used her Chief Of Staff, Mike Tibbles, her husband, the state’s Attorney General and herself to contact Public Safety Commissioner Monegan no less than 24 times in regards to complaints about Alaska State Trooper Mike Wooten. Common sense tells us that she “abused her power as governor.” Go figure…

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Obama/Bailout/Acorn – Obama connection with Acorn to release 20% of taxpayer profit from bailout plan. Thank God for McCain for helping to uncover this and help killed this plan.
http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/25/kill-the-bailout-more-acorn-funding/

Posted by: Sally298 | September 27, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Wow! So he said $250,000 income instead of $200,000 income. That’s a major mistake? It’s sure going to affect almost all of us, isn’t it?

Posted by: Mickey | September 27, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Posted by: CommonSense ..don’t you ever get tired?…

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Isn’t Obama the second biggest recipient of Freddie Mac political contributions after Chris Dodd? And Franklin Raines is one of Obama’s top economic advisors, the same Raines who collected $90 million while running Fannie Mae into the ground? Fundalmental reforms were put forward by McCain and others in Congress to rein in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in 2005 but liberal Democrats like Chris Dodd, Barack Obama, and Barney Frank killed it. Remember these are the same guys receiving the lion share of political contributions from both organizations. Now look at the mess we’re in. Funny how you all want to put Obama in charge of the economy? Yikes!

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Trooper Gate is an Alaskan problem and has nothing to do with the financial crisis we suffer. Save the space and just say that you hate Palin because she could be a woman vice-president.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

JB – I guess you don’t read the news – it was held yesterday, at the White House, about our economy.

Posted by: Ravenhair | September 27, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Grover’s Vision:
An America in which the rich will be taxed at the same rates as the poor, where the minimum wage is repealed, unions are made irrelevant, and law-abiding citizens can pack handguns in every state and town. “My ideal citizen is the self-employed, homeschooling, IRA-owning guy with a concealed-carry permit,” says Norquist. “Because that person doesn”t need the godd@mn government for anything.”
Norquist is famous for saying, “I don”t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” His plan is for the federal government to amass massive debt without increasing taxes on the rich, if the federal government is mired in huge debt it can no longer fund social programs of any kind, including Social Security, Medicaid, Veterans benefits…
Now how could you amass such massive debt in a short 8 years??

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Posted by: Sally298 | September 27, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Federal Bailouts (so far):
$8,900,000,000 IndyMac
$30,000,000,000 Bear Stearns
$85,000,000,000 AIG
$200,000,000,000 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
on top of $9,000,000,000,000 debt and Bush is seeking $700,000,000,000 more to bail out the fatcats! wow!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

McCain lied repeatedly about Obama’s record last night and ABC quibbles over $50,000? Talk about media bias! ABC is obviously in the tank for McCain

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Who is Grover Norquist?
In 1999 Grover Norquist was instrumental in securing early support for then Texas Governor George W. Bush, continuing a decades-long association with Karl Rove. (“The Wall Street Journal”s John Fund dubbed him “the Grand Central Station” of conservatism and told The Nation: “It”s not disputable” that Norquist was the key to the Bush campaign”s surprising level of support from movement conservatives in 2000″). After Bush”s election to the White House in 2000, Norquist was the prime architect behind the many Bush tax-cuts.
The “Wednesday Meeting” of Norquist”s Leave Us Alone Coalition has become an important hub of conservative political organizing. George W. Bush began sending a representative to the Wednesday Meeting even before he formally announced his candidacy for president in 1999. “Now a White House aide attends each week,” reported USA Today in June 2001. “Vice President Cheney sends his own representative. So do GOP congressional leaders, right-leaning think tanks, conservative advocacy groups and some like-minded K Street lobbyists. The meeting has been valuable to the White House because it is the political equivalent of one-stop shopping. By making a single pitch, the administration can generate pressure on members of Congress, calls to radio talk shows, and political buzz from dozens of grassroots organizations.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Richard Says:
I hate seeing ignorant people saying that Obama is a fraud. Specifically those who naively support the bullying Republican party without just cause. Though I cannot find any particular just cause to do so.
Who is it the media is picking on? Who is it Hollywood is picking on? Does not Obama run negative ads? Who brought on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae ans squelched corrective legislation?
If the Republican party bullies, well we would have to say the Democrats connive and denigrate.

Posted by: Sane American | September 27, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Sally -
What else did Rush say?

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

How come McCain forgot to wear his flag pin last night? Does he no longer support the troops? Symbols matter! McCain needs to show us that he loves America and supports the troops! Without wearing a little metal flag pin that’s made in China on his lapel, how will we Americans know that he’s patriotic? I am so confused!

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

CommonSense..it won’t be long before you run eveyone out of here..can you imagine, you will have to read your own idiot comments..scary thought, eh?

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

The McCain/Obama debate shows me that Obama is a dreamer with empty meaningless words. Obama is totally out of reality. He will cost taxpayers more than the financial crisis we suffer today.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

While it is true that some individual politicians have been truer to their party philosophy than others, to miss the nuances of the party differences is to deceive yourself into masturbatory state of naivety! Everyone knows that Republicans, especially the efforts of Phil Gramm, are the guilty party for the current “LET’S SOCIALIZE ALL OUR BAD DEBT” project!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

The simple fact is that for most Americans, Obama’s plan will lower taxes while McCain’s will raise them. For the very richest American’s the reverse is true. See CNN’s summary of the non-partisan Tax Policy Institute: http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/11/news/economy/candidates_taxproposals_tpc/index.htm

Posted by: Josh G | September 27, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Do you realize that a lot of small business owner file their company income in their personal income because it is cheaper than file the profits under the business. So a lot of small business owners will file person income taxes over the 250,000 even though they personally don’t make that much. These people then are going to pay more in taxes which in turn will affect their business. If their business has to pay more in taxes then they wont be able to hire more people and they might even have to let people got to make budget. This dose not sound like a good idea to. So taxing people who make 250,000 or more on paper might sound good doesn’t really work out so well.

Posted by: Sam | September 27, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

I have no problem with socialism anymore. President Bush and Hank Paulson want to socialize the banking sector to protect the wealthy and Rush Limbaugh says that’s okay. So socialism is a-ok with me now! Except for healthcare and things that will help poor people. I think socialism should be reserved for those who deserve it most – the rich. They worked hard for their free money and should be rewarded with more. Yay for socialism!

Posted by: Sally298 | September 27, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

OBAMA IS LEADING! In the polls, in history, in new voter registration, in fundraising, in campaign management, by every metric possible! Conventional wisdom has always said that you can determine how a president will lead by observing how he leads his campaign and the decision he made in picking his vice presidential nominee! Obama/Biden 08, real leadership for a new generation! What a STELLAR campaign being run by an incredible young, American leader! Go OBAMA/BIDEN

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

raise your hands if you think CommonSence has no commonsence

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Why couldn’t McCain look Obama in the eye yesterday? It’s hard to trust a man who can’t look his opponent in the eye or wear a flag pin in his lapel.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Do you realize that a lot of small business owner file their company income in their personal income because it is cheaper than file the profits under the business. So a lot of small business owners will file person income taxes over the 250,000 even though they personally don’t make that much. These people then are going to pay more in taxes which in turn will affect their business. If their business has to pay more in taxes then they wont be able to hire more people and they might even have to let people got to make budget. This dose not sound like a good idea to. So taxing people who make 250,000 or more on paper might sound good doesn’t really work out so well.

Posted by: Sam | September 27, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

If you’re making 200K a year as an individual in todays or any other economy, your doing just fine.

Posted by: dan | September 27, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Raise your hands if you think LordHelpLiberals is a deluded dumbf–k.

Posted by: leo fuld | September 27, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Obama has my vote. Under Bush or McSame I can only have 32″ TV. If Obama becomes our president, I’ll have a 60″.
Welfare Queen.
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: ProKerry | September 27, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

If you really want an answer as to why we are in this economic mess and why Obama is a disaster waiting to happen, then read this article.
http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13931

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Sam – then they shouldn’t try to cheat the taxman by filing their business taxes as personal income, should they? One more example of how Obama wants to close the tax loopholes for the rich.

Posted by: Dilly | September 27, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Two points I’d like to make in contrast to some of the comments here. There are many more I could make, but I’m too tired.
#1) Obama does NOT oppose nuclear power. There are safety issues with storage of spent fuel – problems with transportation to Yucca, the fact that Yucca is not open yet and may never open, and the fact that we have uranium being stored onsite at nuclear facilities all over the country. If those issues are satisfactorily resolved, Obama will be on board with building new plants.
#2) McCain’s health care plan will cost us a ton. I’ll suddenly be taxed on the $14,000 it costs my company to provide my medical benefits. And, should they decide to do away with medical coverage because of McCain’s move to independent insurance, sure, I’ll get a $5000 tax credit, but I’ll have to come up with the additional funds to actually purchase the insurance. We know the insurance lobby in Washington is one of the most powerful and they will do everything to protect their interests. You can darn well bet this will include price increases on medical coverage. It’s a disastrous plan.

Posted by: DebM | September 27, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

It’s hilarious how the gullible, lost, misled republicans want to create an ethics scandal through fabricated, stretched, associations on Obama while their VP candidate, Sarah Failin, is actually under ETHICS violation investigation and John McCain was found guilty of gross poor judgment in his KEATING 5 scandal! GET REAL! OBAMA/BIDEN have no ethics problems. On the other hand, your candidates really have some serious crap to deal with. OBAMA/BIDEN for real leadership!!!!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

jb: So you want post under my id what a shame. You learned well from your master Obama to lie and cheat if you can not win.

Posted by: Sally297 | September 27, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Patrick – the spectator is a rightwing partisan rag. I wipe my a$$ with it. Get a real source for your anti-Obama rants.

Posted by: kimbers | September 27, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

OK Raven.
If it was a White House meeting, it was called by George W. Bush, who is the president. When the president calls a meeting he runs the meeting. There is no such thing as a presidential meeting where someone else is in charge. (Someone on the board has suggested that Obama was running the meeting and could not preserve order) Neither Obama nor McCain is president. There can be only one president at a time. If Obama or McCain was president, they would have called the meeting and invited whomever they wanted to invite to deliver the desired results. From what has been reported the meeting was a circus. Look – you don’t like Obama and will believe any negatives anyone wants to tell you about him. This is trite.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I love socialism for the wealthy! Thank you Mr. Bush, for giving free money to the rich! I don’t mind paying higher taxes to bail out the ruling class! Socialism is what capitalism is all about! Yay!

Posted by: Sally298 | September 27, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Ok..i am a moron…my dad and mother were sister and brother and also my aunt and uncle..i don’t have a clue about anything..i only comment here because i do not have a life…so, please allow me to rant and raqve aboutr nothing at all..it gives me something to do…my wife left me last year to be with her sister.

Posted by: CommonSence | September 27, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Debates, polls, speeches, talking heads, twisted words, political spin, personal attacks on families, racist attacks, blatant misogyny, etc. ad nauseam. This is slimy gutter politics.
Campaigns have become too long and too expensive. The DNC and its manipulative “leadership”, with the complicity of the mainstream media, is trying to foist an unqualified “candidate” upon the citizens of this nation.
Who won the “debate”, as though it was just another TV game show? Why can Obama REFUSE to debate Clinton, but McCain can not POSTPONE a debate, for the good of the country? Who’s leading in the polls? Are we going to do what the talking heads tell us we are going to do? Do a handful of pollees truly speak for the millions of each state?
Can’t the millions being spent on primaries and elections be put to better use, especially in these trying times? Which raises the question of where Obama’s millions come from: online contributions, right? Should the Electoral College trump the national popular vote? Can’t this nation grow up politically? Where is the Center Party and who will form one?
Why are we fighting a major war and facing an increasingly hostile world with a “volunteer” army and no draft? Are we crazy? And this with a large pool of unemployed and undisciplined youth. A “National Service Corps” or reinstating the Draft? The choice should be obvious.
Why all the greed and avarice? What ever happened to ethics and morality; has it been replaced by the almighty buck?
I don’t have many answers, but I don’t like what I see and hear. So, I will make my decision on Nov. 4, not that it will change the nation, but because it is the right thing to do. Hopefully, it will count for something.
Nobama ’08
Lemmings for Obama.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Americans are really fed up with McCains Dramatics and twisted misleading lies. All he did was act like a cranky, disrepectful old man who is either too scared or too ugly to look is opponent in the eye!!! BIG Win for Obama!!! Big win in NOV for OBAMA!!

Posted by: Rodger | September 27, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Basically, America has lost its farming base and its manufacturing base. Driving our economic growth for the last eight years has been the FINANCE BUBBLE, credit and mortgages, coupled with exotic derivatives and other risky financial instruments. We need a leader who can inspire America with a vision that results in Americans actually MANUFACTURING something of value for the world other than EXOTIC FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS. OBAMA stands alone as the candidate taking us in that direction.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

I am so confused by McCain not wearing a flag pin last night. I want to vote for him, but now I don’t know if he’s patriotic anymore. How can I vote for a man who doesn’t support the troops? Has McCain gone over to the terrorists? Is he working with Al Queda now? How can he go around without a flag pin? Why does he hate America now?

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

What CNNmoney shows me is that the you will pay more for everything you buy. The people that are paying more tax will charge you more for everything you buy. You people just do not understand that the people at the top are part of the free enterprise system. When they pay more for something, you pay more for something. That is what makes the world go round.
If Obama would not be part of the political machine, he would have call for a flat tax. The people that Obama wants to pay higher taxes will have loop holes that Obama cannot change. A flat tax has no loop holes.
There will be no real change in Washington. The more thing change the more they stay the same.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

The daddy’s basement posters here have no clue what their parents will be having to pay if Obama is President!!! Oh wait…many of them have no daddy. Once they become real Taxpayers they will change their tunes. Hey when you go to your mommy for your allowance..do not be surprised if half her pay check is eaten away by the Obama taxes. Spoiled children. I hope we have a big depression…so these kids will see what we older Americans learned. But they have no idea how to survive…yea…I’m for thinning out the weak in the herd.

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

John McCain and Linsdey Graham got it wrong! There is no greater honor than running for President of the United States of America (the POTUS). Erratically suspending your campaign, breaking your agreement to debate this Friday, and running away from the POTUS to hide in your old job of 26 years, shows a lack of respect and total disdain for the competency of your former colleagues. Furthermore, it’s clear that you did it because you were un-prepared to debate, afraid that Obama was going to defeat you one on one, as the polls show that he did, and that you are unable to multi-task! You momentarily abandoned the most important, patriotic honor anyone can hope to have, seeking the POTUS as your party’s nominee. Once again, you rejected the will of the American people for the debate this Friday in support of your own erratic agenda; and, then turned around and showed up anyway, just like the FLIP-FLOPPER that you are. You are not running for Senate re-election, McCain. However, in running for the POTUS, your action was a gimmick and distraction, from both the work of the Senate as well as the Office of the POTUS.
McCain, you are a distraction to both. Please take your Circus act, with all your lipstick, pigs, moose, 13 cars, 11 houses, 2 wives (Carol in the eyes of God and Cindi the adulteress), power abusing, de-regulator, Phil Gramm nation of whiners, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, unwed teenage pregnancy, ethics investigation, stick the $1,000 rape kit to the victim in Wasilla, bunch on your Bridge Outta Here. John McCain, sit down and shut up!

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Sally -
I think you may have misread something. I didn’t post under your name – maybe I was addressing you. I don’t know how to post under anything but jb. I’m thinking that if I did post as sally, jb would not appear, so why would you think it is me?

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Kimbers – the truth hurts, eh? Open your eyes. Obama is a lefty and his collectivist vision is bad for America. But you go ahead and embrace his ideals of a workers paradise.

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Common Sence – you’re right, you ARE a moron. Common Sense, on the other hand, is a very smart and well-spoken poster whose posts make good, clear sense to me. Good luck, sounds like a hard life being so stupid. LOL

Posted by: leo fuld | September 27, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

leigh: that’s how it’s supposed to be pronounced….

Posted by: Sevres Blue | September 27, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

The most significant change that Obama/Biden will bring to the White House is leadership that actually leads, by changing our government’s strategies and culture so that they have a better fit to the global economy.
Obama has an excellent ability to shape a strategic vision of a realistic and attractive future that binds us together as Americans and focuses our energy toward super ordinate goals as a nation.
Obama stands alone as the candidate who can frame messages around a grand purpose with emotional appeal that captivates the best in us. Transformational leaders not only talk about a vision; they enact it. They walk the talk by stepping outside the executive suite and doing things that symbolize the vision, the way that Obama performed during the primaries and the way he has run a STELLAR overall campaign, the way he won the debate.
Obama stands alone as the candidate best equipped to demonstrate a Can Do attitude with an image of honesty, trust, and integrity.
OBAMA IS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA! OBAMA 08; Yes We Can

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Patrick – what truth? I just told you that the Spectator is NOT a credible source. And neither are you. Get real, dude.

Posted by: kimbers | September 27, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

you AMERICANS are all R E T A R D E D..seriously.

Posted by: CommonSence | September 27, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I probably won’t have a job here after posting this, but I really had to post and poke fun after reviewing the logs. Almost eighty percent of the pro-McCain comments in these blogs are coming from three individuals/computers posting under multiple names. A little less than twenty five percent of the pro-obama comments are coming from four individuals/computers posting under multiple names. Looks to me like the McCain camp is running scared and turning up the spin.

Posted by: ABCStats | September 27, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Kimbers is right, Patrick, the Spectator is a trashy, biased, partisan rightwing rag that’s all opinions and no facts. It is not credible or respected by anyone but other partisan wingnuts. Decent people don’t take it very seriously. Next!

Posted by: leo fuld | September 27, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

McCain clearly lost this debate – he couldn’t even follow the debate rules – never ever answered one question clearly – he just repeated (and this is right from the Republican Playbook) “Obama doesn’t seem to understand…I was a POW… I have travelled to many foreign countries… Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan, Ronald Reagan. ……………….. And it was CLEAR that if we elect him he’ll BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB BOMB IRAN…. which is fine if you WANT to lose MORE American troops. Diplomacy is not even in McCain’s vocabulary.

Posted by: Sevres Blue | September 27, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

i resemble that comment..i am also a moron

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

As stupid as I am, even I know that McCain is a pathetic liar.

Posted by: CommonSence | September 27, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

well, CommonSence…. how nice of you to call Americans names….yea we made it possible to you to say that…saving your butts for over 100 yrs now.
But since you could not post anything bad about your government in your local paper…it’s nice to see you can post that here.

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Sounds like someone’s subscription to Mother Jones is about to expire…

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

For every rant by CommonSense…3 bloggers change their allegiance to McCain. Keep it up!! McCain/Palin thanks you for your support!

Posted by: Jim | September 27, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

McCaIN IS A LIAR…every politician in our history is a liar…geez, politician 101..how to be a liar .

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

“thousands of people loose their jobs”
his has been happening for the last 8 years under the Bush administration. Why would a continuation of the same policy under McCain make things any better. It is not all related to taxes, and there is not enough money in “earmarks” to make a difference. In fact, on the local level, federal spending is good for the economy. Look up “depression, great”. Largely, we are suffering from a lack of imagination.
And Commonsense has a lot of sense.

Posted by: jb | September 27, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Well, I see that someone has stolen my name! Imitation is flattery, I guess. Hmmmmmmm, now I understand what Obama meant about McCain stealing his slogans. Republicans are indeed a slimy, pathetic bunch!! I’ll see ya’ll later

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Obama took a little political license as all politicians do and used the couple instead of the individual number for his example, so what. I wonder why the article doesn’t mention that Obama’s statement was in response to a flat out lie by McCain when McCain said Obama’s tax plan would raise taxes at 43K. ALL independent tax reviews of the two plans show Obama’s plan giving far more of a break to the middle class and McCain’s plan giving far more to the highest of incomes. Obama is absolutely correct when saying McCain is in this for the rich and why wouldn’t he be, McCain and his wife are worth over $100 million. Nothing that McCain does as president will ever affect him or his grandchildren.

Posted by: dan | September 27, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Posted by: Jim ,,you make a good point about Commonsense..but, there are also 3 americans that contemplate suicide after reading his stupidity.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Does anybody not remember that (many years ago in a country not so far away) MCCAIN was rabid in supporting the deregulation of Wall Street? So Cindy and his other buddies could skirt the rules and make huge fortunes? Look how well that worked out for the average American. If you don’t thinks McCain’s millions are on Wall Street being handled by the big guys you are very naive. Now look what’s happened – GREAT JUDGEMENT, MCCAIN.

Posted by: Sevres Blue | September 27, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

In the debate Obama said he’d been against the Irag war for 6 years. The implication being he’d been a senator for 6 years. MISLEADING Less than 3 years with 1 1/2 running for President.
Obama repeats over and over how he will cross over the aisle and work with the Repubs. This he did when he and McCain worked together and crafted a bill which they co-sponsored and introduced to the Senate. When it came up for a vote Obama VOTED AGAINST it.
Fact.. Check it out…
This shows he can’t be trusted. If he will misrepresent his tenure to inflate his credentials and also not be trusted then how can anyone believe him?
I sure dont.
What economic plan is he really for? Surely not the one he continues to tout.
Want to bet that the one he has in mind is what is known, in the ultra left wing Dems, as “Economic Justice”?
Look it up (Economic Justice) and become afraid that if he wins the election this plan will come to pass.

Posted by: BarsandStars | September 27, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

I think I understand why McCain wasn’t wearing his flag pin now: it’s pretty clear that he is a “Manchurian Candidate” and his North Vietnamese handlers have finally “activated” him. That explains why he was like a robot that couldn’t look Obama in the eye last night. But McCain – being a godlike American POW hero – had a backup plan. He knew that the North Vietnamese commies wouldn’t support the troops and that when they took over his mind with their dirty commie codeword, the first thing they would do is force him to stop supporting the troops by not wearing a flag pin. So McCain made sure to wear the flag pin every day so that true Americans who watch FOX News would know that when he STOPPED wearing it, that it was time to come to his rescue! Don’t worry, John! I got the signal! I understand that you still support the troops and love America, but that your mind is being held hostage by Vietnamese commies! I am going to out and burn down a Vietnamese restaurant today to help save you! USA! USA! USA!

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Well Obama and his wife are heads of a Hitler Youth Group called PUBLIC ALLIES
It is like Putin’s thugs Hitler Youth group “Nashi”
Many of them are posting all over these commentary places. Hey google it … do the work the ABC and other liberal outlets will not do. See…who is posting here…the Hitler Youth Group Public Allies and ACORN!!!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

I wil say one last thing…you all S U C K !! Obama is like G O D …he is my G O D …he will rule and punish you non believers.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

I love the TITLE of OBAMA MISLEADS…if this were about McCain or Palin the title of this story WOULD BE
MCCAIN LIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIES,
NOT the gentler word of “misleads…”
What a “spin” the liberal media continues to use to go gently on their boy Obama…even when they have to admit that he lies, lies, lies…and is not to be trusted.
Go McCain

Posted by: tiredofbs | September 27, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Obama and his wife are Nazi wife-swapping devil-worshippers! If you don’t believe me Google it! I am not crazy!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

911 was just a way to punish you ignorant America’s for what you have done throughout the world…you will see..it will happen again if you elect McCain and Palin..you will see.

Posted by: CommonSense | September 27, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Obama and wife lure white Christian children into their basement and then murder them and use their blood in satanic rituals. If you don’t believe me Google it! I am not crazy no matter what Dr. Frankel told the court!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

LordHelpLiberals…. get the tinfoil off your head…oh wait…stop watching dumb movies. Oh wait… Al Queida has people it trained 25 yrs ago and back for attacks…Obama was a Muslin student ion Pakistan back then…maybe he is a sleeper cell. Yep…that’s it….a Jihadist Sleeper Cell…he sure spends alot of time backing out of his middle name HUSSIEN!!!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

I think Commonsense is off his meds. But he is right about one thing, a lot of Obama’s supporters think of him as The Chosen One.

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

I’m still a little interested in why the short little comment article by ABC? Are they afraid after last night’s decadently strong victory by Obama that the race is all but over? Are they afraid that the excitement of a close race is less likely so they are determined to bring Obama down to the median again? It’s interesting how after all of Obama’s great performances with his speech on race relations, his trip to Europe, his amazing nomination acceptance speech and now the first debate that each and every time the media deems it necessary to run an article to counter Obama’s victories.

Posted by: dan | September 27, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

We can fix our economy right now if we would just sharply increase taxes on employers, savers, investors, big business, small business, anyone who would start a business, and workers who make too much money. We need more power and authority for the wise, selfless, government bureaucrats in Washington who really understand our economy and how to fix it. Then, acting only in the public interest for the good of all peoples, without any influence from special interests or politics, they can impose new regulatory burdens on the stupid, greedy, corrupt businesses that actually hire the workers and pay them their wages.
We also need more money and power for Washington to increase federal spending by an additional trillion plus dollars. Then, we can give $50 billion each year to the UN to fight a global war on poverty. As a nation of hopeful peoples, we could then also spend so much more here at home for child care, health care, welfare, education, state and local government spending, new green energy based on love rather than greed, and retooled cars designed for the social good, all run by the government and those same wise, all-knowing, non-political, government bureaucrats in Washington.
This is the Barack Obama economic recovery plan. He got it from the same people who developed the Hugo Chavez economic plan for Venezuela. Honest.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

McCain and Palin are on their way to the White House..CommonSense has none.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Congrats folks on finally unmasking CommonSense. His last post about Obama being his “god” reveals his identity as a cult leader. That is
all Obama is…a cult leader with a legion of goons brainwashed to believe him to be a messiah.
Thank God for common sense Americans coming to THEIR senses that McCain is the only choice. The ONLY choice.

Posted by: Jim | September 27, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Regarding Obama’s proposed tax increase: Currently, the top 10% of income earners (household) pay 68% of all Federal Income Taxes. And this is not enough? How long before he will take the next step and have the top 10% of earners pay 100% of the taxes so everyone else can be deadbeats? How greedy. How socialistic. How un-American.

Posted by: ST | September 27, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Diane – Don’t you understand what’s happened? Our John has been brainwashed by a bunch of damn yellow commies and we true Americans need to step up and free him before Obama and his America-hating wife can seize power and impose radical muslim socialism on America. Either you’re for us or you’re against us! I am launching a secret, rambo-like attack on Vietnam to free McCain’s mind. Are you with me?

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

#1) Obama does NOT oppose nuclear power. There are safety issues with storage of spent fuel – problems with transportation to Yucca, the fact that Yucca is not open yet and may never open, and the fact that we have uranium being stored onsite at nuclear facilities all over the country. If those issues are satisfactorily resolved, Obama will be on board with building new plants.
[material snipped]
Posted by: DebM
========================================
Given Obama’s relationship with Exelon, I should think he would be all for nuclear plants. As for the waste, perhaps it could be buried under the garden of the house that Rezko “facilitated” for Obama in Chicago. Such as solution would certainly take the wind out of the sails of the “Not in my backyard” folks, wouldn’t it. And this wouldn’t be the first time there was radioactive material under Chicago, as Enrico Fermi did it in 1942. But if that is not acceptable, I am sure either Iran or Venezuela would be willing to take it off our hands, for a fee of course.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

CommonSense…are you threatening the US? Where are you from? Are you telling us that Al Queda will bomb us if Obama is not elected? MMMMM….a great reason to vote for McCain!!! We in this country do not stand for threats!!! We are not dictated to!!! You need to have the FBI look at you….I consider you a threat to America!!!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Obama and his wife cast an African voodoo devil worship spell on Palin, but she was too crafty for them and found another African witchdoctor to couteract the spell. Google it if you don’t believe me. I am not crazy, no matter what my family says! I will not be silenced!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Commonsense,
It’s sad you have none. I’m so glad you live in the US where you can spout off all the dribble you have stored up in that tiny little mind of yours.
Obama himself, said we were facing the greatest crisis since the Great Depression and you would have them sit in their rooms and stay up all night cramming for the debates like some 20ish frat boy afraid of failing his finals.
McCain showed true leadership in not putting his own ambitions in front of the good of the nation. The Republicans were not majorly included in hammering out a “true” deal and it only stands to reason that the Next President should be heavily involved in determining the policy that will effect generations to come. Obama said, “Call me if you need me, I be there in a hurry, and that you can depend and never worry!” paraphrased. What a sad, weak, and lame, comment to make. Not ready to lead Obama!!!
I thought Obama did better than I expected but I still think McCain aced the debate. Round 1 – McCain

Posted by: Dave | September 27, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Hate to say it but all politicians are liars! Doesn’t it bother ANYONE that politicians always talk about the voting population as “common folks” or “main street.” They speak from this lofty position because THEY are not common folks, they are ALL rich, rich on OUR money that they receive as kickbacks from lobbyists for wasteful spending and bogus projects. Get with it people, we’re being fleeced!!! They talk about budgetary problems and fixing social security and yet not one of them would EVER suggest eliminating the lifetime salary they receive should they retire. No social security for them, no sir – they’re not “common folks” like us. I’ve had it with all the losers and Obama won’t be any different. Look at his past dealings and you’ll see he’s just another politician – a dirty, greedy scumbag.

Posted by: Chris | September 27, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

As an undecided voter, I looked this up wks ago. BO is accurate. In the washington post it lists the tax proposals of both candidates.
I was concerned about McCain’s lack of eye contact and smirking during the debate. I was expecting to hear more about rising costs of living expenses we’ve had b/c of the Bush Administration. The debate did make it seem like McCain has been a part of the problem, giving breaks only to the wealthy corporations. I’m having doubts about McCain after that debate.

Posted by: Lori | September 27, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

has anyone noticed how many times saddam obama has replied back to mc cain and said “your correct or i agree with you?” mc cain never once said i areee with you. then why would you vote for obama when you you can vote the right man mccain. that democrat is nothing more than a chicago power machine. think about this, he may take mayor daley and todd stroger with him to washington and really screw up things

Posted by: tom | September 27, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

i am a card carrying Ronald Reagan conservative..it appears commonsense has taken my name and using it..what an idiot…

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Rezko! REZKO! REZKO! ARRRGGHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Does anyone else have a sick feeling that if McCain is elected President , we will end up in another major war? I get that vibe from him.

Posted by: Indy | September 27, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

ST…also…when was the last time you were hired by a guy who only makes 20k a year? Doctors make over $200,000 a year…you know they are going to pass those costs on to the patient…you know that they will not hire that extra medical worker….Obama has no clue about the economy….he is just playing the wealth card…like he does the race card. No one under $20K a year is an employer…even farmers who have land are considered rich by Obama….

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

I am a card carrying Blockbuster renter and I am organizing a supersecret mission to Vietnam to free John McCain’s brain. Who wants to get in on the action. No military training necessary, just come over my trailer and watch some Rambo movies. But you have to bring your own gun. USA! USA! USA!

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Chuck: “How come McCain can’t look Barack in the eye. never looked over to his opponent.”
Because you’re supposed to address the moderator in a debate – he’s the one asking the questions! You’re also not supposed to interrupt your opponent, even if you raise your hand first. Obama came across as rude and arrogant – not even letting his opponent finish his sentences. He should have done some research on debate etiquette…

Posted by: lc | September 27, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

This from ST -
“Regarding Obama’s proposed tax increase: Currently, the top 10% of income earners (household) pay 68% of all Federal Income Taxes. And this is not enough? How long before he will take the next step and have the top 10% of earners pay 100% of the taxes so everyone else can be deadbeats? How greedy. How socialistic. How un-American.”
ST – Bingo! You got it right!

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Indy…no….and his strenght will keep other rogue countries thinking twice…he does not blink….
BTW…Indy is that like the far leftist anti-war group name…Indymedia? Yep…thought so.

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Obama and his wife are nazis just like Vladimir Putin and Hillary Clinton. Anyone who is not a extreme rightwing conservative is a nazi. I am not crazy. If I was crazy, would the orderlies let me use the computer in the dayroom? No!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

lc – um. then how come Jim Lehrer was practically begging McCain to interact with Obama. you’re full of crap.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

All the polls show Americans now understand Obama is the stronger candidate. You right wing fighters just keep swinging against the wind. Obama will be the next President of the United States and finally we will have a President that will put Americans before corporate welfare. I’m out, have a great day — Obama/Biden 08’

Posted by: dan | September 27, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Gee…McCain worked all day yesterday…flew in to the debate…Obama did not work all day…went to a spa….and McCain beat Obama at the debate…now if that’s old…I hope I will be like that at his age!!!!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

McCain does not blink – like a lizard or a mighty komodo dragon. Our enemies will quake in fear when they see that our President is a powerful, remorseless killing machine like a komodo dragon. When Vladimir putin sees McCain crush the skull of a small deer in his mighty jaws he will no longer rear his head in Alaska’s airspace. I am not crazy. The doctors are liars!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Diane – wrong. Obama beat McCain. Nice try, crazylady.

Posted by: balanced blade | September 27, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Obama kept agreeing with McCain during the debate. Let’s face it, Obama did okay during the debate but he LOST… Now I’m outta here!

Posted by: Patrick | September 27, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

REZKO! REZKO! REZKO! AAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHH!!!

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Obama won the debate, I still support Hillary, but Obama won it. McCain is not even a consideration…I cannot even understand how ANYBODY would even consider McCain/Palin, they are whackos.
Obama/Biden ’08 Hillary/Pelosi ’12

Posted by: myhumbleopinion | September 27, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

while at first i didn’t agree with mccain’s tax breaks to corporations, i now think it’s a much smarter idea. companies only make so much money and the more money they have to pay to the government, the less they are able to spend on hiring people, not laying people off, giving raises, etc. come on people, these corporations are your employers!! do you want to keep your jobs? or would you rather we become a socialist regime where there is no incentive to work anymore because the more you make the more you give to the government to give to dead beats who don’t want to get off their butts and go get a job!

Posted by: lc | September 27, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Patrick – face it, McCain lost. Obama won.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

balancedblade…I am not crazy…I am an older woman with education and experience. Your mommy is calling you to get off the computer and take out the trash,, you should hurry or no allowance for you from her hard earned pay check.

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I look at these comments and it is little wonder why we can just buy your vote every four years. You foolish people seem to think that these elections are about some petty little issue.
In the end, the candidate who is subject to the least amount of bashing takes all. So my friends and I just have to fund some so-called citizens group that is eager to sling mud on national television. The best investment we ever made was in Swift Boats. You fanatic patriot types are never in short supply.
Oh I’m sorry; you all like to think that you voted for him. Well then, this mess is your fault isn’t it? HA, HA, I love it.
I mean, you can’t really fault the man himself; he was just acting on some advice. The real power lies with those that influence him. You must never forget that all politicians are in fact just influence peddlers. When it comes to the Bush Dynasty, well let’s just say that we got those good old boys locked up tight. That’s right, we’ve had em for years, suckers.
For those of you, who are worried about money, don’t be. They have a printing press, and can make more of it at any time. It is after all, just a bunch of worthless little pieces of paper. But as long as you fools are willing to go out and work for it every day, it doesn’t really matter anyway.
See you morons at the polls, I got to go whip this fool into shape.
MCAIN! GET YOUR ASS OVER HERE!

Posted by: Rich | September 27, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Thank God McCain does not blink. Blinking is a sign of weakness in the animal kingdom. That is why giant lizards like the mighty komodo dragon do not blink – the mighty komodo dragon stares down it’s prey with it’s unblinking lizard gaze. John McCain will do the same to America’s enemies. He will stare them down like a mighty komodo dragon and then crush their skulls in his mighty jaws while shaking them and snapping their puny necks! Then mighty McCain will bury his blood-flecked muzzle into their corpses and feast on their still warm flesh! America needs a mighty killing machine like McCain in the white house! America needs a man who isn’t afraid to kill and eat his opponents like the mighty komodo dragon! I am not crazy!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Diane – the more you deny that you’re crazy, the crazier you appear.

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 27, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

John McCain is strong like a mighty warlord and will wear the skins of his enemies like trophies after he devours their defeated corpses like a fearsome komodo dragon! I know this because he does not blink! I am not crazy! McCain/Palin 08!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Barack Obama and his wife are nazi devil worshipper wife swappers who don’t recycle. I know this because of the Google. My dog told me this and I googled it and it was true. I am an older woman with education and experience and I am not crazy.

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

A decision seems pretty simple, there’s no need to argue people!
If you’re happy with the current economic conditions, vote for McCain.
If you are not happy and want to change those conditions, vote for Obama.
If you want to stay in Iraq and continue the war, vote for McCain.
If you would like to stop the waste of money and lost of lives and end the war, vote for Obama.
I really don’t care who won the debate and all the other petty nonsense.

Posted by: Middle | September 27, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Dianne – I agree. We need a non-blinking, giant-reptile as a President. But I disagree with your characterization of McCain as a Komodo dragon. I see him as a powerful nile crocodile, lying in silent wait for America’s enemies, ready to spring forward on his powerful hind legs, propelled by his massive tail, to grab them in his terrible jaws like a wildebeast and drag them under the murky water for a slow death roll. This is the way I see McCain – as a powerful, ancient crocodile. Like a crocodile, he has the wisdom of age to know that he can kill a wildebeast, but store it’s lifeless corpse in an underwater grotto to devour later. This is the kind of no-nonsense common sense wisdom we need in our half-man/half-reptile leaders.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Yes, and why doesn’t the media put this on the front page of things and make everyone know that Obama was caught in this lie…hmmmm should we say they are BIASED and providing unfair media. And the lie about Henry Kissinger…etc.
Obama should also be more respectful. Calling Senior Senator ‘John’ and not Senator McCain…reminds me he has not shown respect for our country by deciding if he FEELS like doing the Pledge of Allegiance. And yes, now he might of changed…He will change anything until after the election…TO JUST GET VOTED IN!!! Wake up America!!!
Lastly, I noticed that John McCain was taking notes and just coming at Obama without having THREE DAYS to practice in Clearwater while SENATOR McCain was in Washington trying to do HIS JOB! Both men are still senators and being paid by their constituents…they need to do the RIGHT THING! Maybe that is work for their constituents….
If your multinational level company was collapsing…would you tell your management team that you were on a business trip and would be available by phone if they needed you! ABSOLUTELY NOT! And this is even bigger …it ‘s the entire USA. Give me a break…read the facts and not just the main media liars but read the FACTS! Look at the record and protect your country.
MEDIA PLEASE START TELLING THE TRUTH ABOUYT OBAMA! or at least TRY to give fair coverage! Otherwise what good are you???

Posted by: A proud independent | September 27, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Yavo – that’s a good point. But why not depict McCain as a fearsome Australian saltwater Crocodile? Their jaws can crush a small volkswagen, much like McCain. And like the komodo dragon and the nile croc, the fearsome Australian saltwater crocodile DOES NOT BLINK. John McCain will NOT BLINK when he is devouring unlucky fishermen in the Australian outback, and that is what I look for in a my giant reptile Presidents. I am still NOT crazy!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

A proud independent – I agree! Also did you know that the media often sends Obama white Christian children for him to kill in a ritual manner? This is because the media is run by Jewish people. Who want to kill white Christian babies to bake their chanukah driedels. This is true because my dog told it to me and I saw it on the Google. I am a mature, educated woman and not at all crazy. Thanks! McCain/Palin ’08

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I cannot wait to see President McCain take Vladimir Putin’s head in his mighty crocodile jaws and take him under the Potomac for a slow death roll. That is what a leader who doesn’t blink will do to our enemies! USA! USA! USA! I am still not crazy!

Posted by: Diane Binder | September 27, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

President Bush, you are indeed a miracle worker. People blame you for all financial problems the USA suffers today. President Bush, I would like to know just how did you create such a financial mess in only eight short years? Indeed, you must have a magic wand. Just look at the financial mess with the banks, the stock market, mortgage loans, credit card debt, high medical costs, people out of work, people losing their homes and list goes on and on to what seems infinity.
President Bush, admit it, you had help from the congress, the senate and previous presidential administrations. Confess, you did have help, didn‘t you?
Fear not, President Bush, Obama says he can fix it all with his magic wand. He will create more government that will require more tax dollars to run. He will duplicate all that has happened to the federal government in the past seventy years and more. He will give all the people everything that you could not give them in eight short years. That is what I call change.
Mr. President, as P.T. Barnum would say, “there’s a sucker born every minute”.
I guess he was mostly taking about US taxpayers. I wish you well, Mr. President. I know people will not remember you as the best President, but the worst is yet to come if Obama wins.

Posted by: Judge | September 27, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

ABCStats: How do the rest of know that you really work for ABC? I can say that I have been working for Obama and just realized that he is all-talk,& little action, unless he’s getting money from government to dole out-look at the amount of his pork programs.during his short time in the U.S. Senate…
To CommonSense:I researched campaign contributions & I found that Chris Dodd, Dem. Chair of Banking, Housing, & Urban Affairs took the largest amount of money from the financial, insurance & real estate industry. So how do you pin this financial crisis on Republicans solely.Since Carter Admin, this “home ownership for everyone” MADE banks accept for loans POOR RISK PEOPLE-people who didn’t have job skills & steady employment.
Amazingly, many of you Obamites want to criticize McCain about being a POW, a situation I’m sure he didn’t want, but you’re the same people who didn’t want Kerry criticized for his poor behavior during & immediately after his “service” during the Vietnam War.To those who think everyone passes tax increases on to their customers, many Americans work in the service industry: they teach, they work for small firms, they have SET SALARIES, so they can’t recapture their increased expenses.That doesn’t mean that they want government to step in w/entitlements. You people want it 2 ways-you want: more benefits which people who make more money than you to pay for;to stay home, not give up your time to get job skills & have immediate gratification for whatever you do while you don’t work…Grow up, accept responsibility for yourselves.Don’t look to government to make up for your lack of initiative.

Posted by: Do Good | September 27, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

McCain had a better showing than I thought he would – I expected Obama to blow his butt of the stage and he didn’t, but then again this is the debate that should have gone to McCain – his turf, National Security….unless of course you really listened to the issues. Ok the surge is working for now, and may be it stay that way when we leave or may be it won’t. But listen to the undertones of what McCain had to say……..it’s about winning…….we didn’t win in Viet Nam and he still hasn’t gotten over it. He talked about the war he was in and how he felt because we didn’t win it and he doesn’t another veteran to feel that way again.
Huh? What about the veteran’s who really didn’t want to go to war in Viet Nam or Iraq and are living with the memories of a war we didn’t belong in in the first place. THAT is what we need to look at. When we are making the decision to go to war and once we are at war, right or wrong, the person making the decision should be looking at the whole picture – not his own personal views from inside a POW camp. John McCain is still carrying the war we never won. He still wants to win the war he never one.
I don’t know about you – but I wouldn’t want my child’s future decide with a person with not a chip on his shoulder but a the whole forest.

Posted by: westie | September 27, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

One the economy, which is far more crucial than anything else – while Obama didn’t knock the homerun I though he would, McCain just plain struck out. He is clueless – he is weak and letting the party run his campaign. I am not a big supported of McCain, but this man has done a complete 180 since the summer. He has either been lying for years or he has given up himself and decided to let the party spin things and they are spinning out of control.
Let’s start with Palin – a maverick? not hardly, a woman driven to get whatever she wants at all costs, good far right Republican. Why not another female in the party….easily Palin will do WHATEVER the party wants, because she isn’t qualified, but she is a legend in her own mind. Comparing herself to Hillary Clinton – give me a break. If there is a Hillary supporter out there who is for Palin, you should be ashamed – you are not about Hillary and being qualified you are about putting a woman in office – any woman – wualified or not. This woman is NOT qualified. If she were she wouldn’t have to had be sequestered from the media – the party surrounding her to answer her questions like a lawyer around a guilty defendent. Speaking of which…….if she isn’t guilty of anything – then why delaying of troopergate testimonies? All this tainted investigation is a load od crap meant to slung at the democrats – its bull hockey-mom. It showmanship to gain attention as was this weeks lets posepone the debates.
I thought McCain was just trying to bail because he knew is butt had had it on the ecomomy – he blew – missed the boat calling it “sound” just before the market tumbled. Then trying to say that he called the American worker sound….what a laugh when the economy fails and jobs are lost, the workers sitting on their couch dazed instead of being at the place they worked for 20 years – explain how sound that is. And they the scripted Palin trying to say there go those Democrats mincing and twisting words again …this is from the woman who LIES about her record on the Bridge to Nowhere….
Give me a break John, you are no longer your own man – you are scripted and spun by your party. You are not only weak, but you have become a puppet. And to think – I actually considered looking at you when this whole process started. However, you lost me way back at the 100 year remark.
People wake up – the country has been under Republican rule for the past 8 years – Obama said it, we can’t take another 4 years of the last 8. McCain isn’t the man he once was, he is the Repubican party – the man he once was would have never picked Palin – he was losing ground and became desparate and let the party take over – if he can’t stand up to his own party, how can he stand up to the rest of the world.
McCain is living in the past and what we need is a future.
Obama/Biden 08 & 12

Posted by: westie | September 27, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

If you think that people over 200K are “RICH”, you need to look around. I make about that much, have a wife, two kids, and work my butt off to struggle to make ends meet in NORTHERN VIRGINIA, where a single family home runs you about 1 million and renting will take at least 4K per month. Sure 200K is alot in Iowa, or Utah, or Alabama, but to a family in DC, San Fran or Manhattan, its downright middle class. THESE are the people who are getting screwed, and being used as Obama’s middle class ATM machine. I cont even begin to perceive how young urban professionals in these areas support democrats…….

Posted by: CK | September 27, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Remember when the AMT tax was started. I was to tax only the few “rich” people with over $40,000 income and above average deductions. Now, it is hitting huge numbers of people, but the revenue is so great, Congress can’t change it. Now, rich is being defined as over $200,000.
They say the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street works out to $2300 for every man, woman, & child in this country. How can Obama finance $800 billion of programs by taxing only the 5% making over $200,000?

Posted by: Ultraconservative | September 27, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

Actually when the Dems let the Bush Tax Cuts expire the middle class family will pay $3000-4000 more.
That is schedule to expire in about 1 1/2 years. But when you get into details, you also find your deductions and exemptions go poof under Democrat written tax laws.
——–
Those Lobbyists? Actually FNMA/FHLMC dropped $200 million in the last ten years and hired EVERY LOBBYIST firm in Washington. They were all on the payroll, so no politician can get a real clean lobby firm. Their job was to make sure NO OVERSIGHT or REGULATION was imposed on the Demo-sugarfirms FNMA & FHLMC.

Posted by: BPK | September 27, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Ultra: He can’t do all the programs clearly. And McCain can’t keep the war going and drop taxes too.
It’s nonsense.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

CK: Your taxes aren’t going up at 200k. When you’re in the upper 5%, whining about your million dollar home doesn’t play well with the average family making a quarter of what you do. I’m not saying you’re rich – you’re not from a money standpoint.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!! Give me a break! since when is it vile to be wealthy, i hope that all who would work hard and earn as much as they want aren’t penalized by any politician that wants more of my hard earned money.
This class warfare has got ot stop, the same old victimization speech is sickening, Orataory doesn’t solve problems, placing blame doesn’t solve problems.
When you propose a tax the rich strategy you paly on the weak minded and insite prejudice, tax any segment of society unfairly and you will have a revolution.
STOP ALL THE YAK say NO to BARAK

Posted by: David | September 27, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

David—- I agree with you.
Therefore, it boils down to who’s the most conservative when it comes to spending programs.
Somebody has to pay for all the freebies.

Posted by: Ultraconservative | September 27, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

I am voting for McCain because he wants to cut government waste. and he said it AGAIN last night. Lets face it. There are lot of lazy people working for the post office , dept of motor vehicles, and dept of human services. And they need to be eliminated so governement can run more efficiently.
Do you really want lazy people working in a government run healthcare system ? which is not going to work anyway. Do you think US tax payers should pay for the healthcare costs of illegals aliens?? Do you think all US tax payers should pay for abortions if it is against their religious beliefs? Also McCain has his heart and soul with our military the people who protect our freedom. He is not willing to put a timeline on the war in Iraq and I agree with him. If you were the victim of
the Holocause for example. If you knew that a regiime was stoning women in an another country would you set a time line on protecting those innoncent lives? How could one set a time line . Obama wants to set a timeline no matter the conditions or the consequences and that just shows how heartless that man truely is. Our military men Want to win the war and know in their hearts that they accomplished what they set out to accomplish . THat is the why they joined the military the 1st place. Oblama is totally clueless and heartless.

Posted by: Sarah | September 27, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

“Earmarks” are the favorite target of the uninformed – check the GAO reports. These things make up a neglible part of the budget. Spending is the problem, but we need more than lip service. McCain has no solution for the problems of Medicare, Social Security and wants to continue the spending debacle in Iraq.
So if you’re thinking McCain iscutting back on spending you’re sadly mistaken. His “solution” for health care will actually cost the government more and not stem rising costs. Privatizing social security is now officially dead – think what would have happened if Bush’s plan actually went through and Social Security was invested in the market now. And he gave no definition of what “winning” in Iraq means. That’s because we know what he means, because he’s said it, he does not want to leave Iraq.
I’m no fan of Obama’s taxes or social programs either, but McCain is a disaster and certainly not a fiscal conservative.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

1percenter — I nver said I was a fan of Mccain, but I’m scared to death of what will happen if the current democratic Congress and Senate, who spend likd drunken sailors, get Obama as a president. They’ll take it as a mandate to implement every conceivable social program…… Which is part of the cause of the housing boom and bust.

Posted by: Ultraconservative | September 27, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Did anyone else heard why the economic meeting held this week when into a complete meltdown. It was because of Obama inability to chair the meeting. The democratic leaders had Obama chair the meeting so they can come with a statement saying that Obama took charge and show strong leadership in the economic meeting with the President. Unfortunately, it did not go as planned. It was said that Obama started the meeting confused, using wrong facts, and not able to get his words out. All attendees were promised not to say anything about what happen in the meeting. It you noticed no one from the democratic party that attended the meeting mentioned any things about Obama’s performance, chairing the meeting. If Obama had performance well, you better believe the party would have shared it with the media.
Another of the reasons Obama did not want to attend the economic meeting, he did not want to be contacted with the bailout plan because it favor some of his old partners at ACORN which is under federal investigation. This information was undercover in the economic meeting, which upset most the republican leaders that attended. The bailout will allow 20% of the profit to be given to the group ACORN that Obama was once a lawyer for two years and work for. If the old bailout planned (with McCain forcing Obama to attend) had passed and once the people find out about the money going to ACORN and people learned of Obama associated with ACORN, then Obama could had said “I did not know about it being in the bailout plan and I was not part of those meeting that agreed with it.

Posted by: Sally297 | September 27, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Sally — Obama was associated with ACORN? Is that the same group that’s being charged in several states wtih voter freaud?

Posted by: Ultraconservative | September 27, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

UL: I think it will be a repeat of 1992. The Dems will squabble amongst themselves, achieve minimal results, and give an opening to a new group of real Republicans in 2010 that will help bring prosperity back.
If McCain is elected, then it’s two more years of stagnation and nothing getting done. And Palin hardly acts or seems like a consensus builder.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 27, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

How is a small business owner going to handle a tax increase if Obama is elected… We will lay off to pay for it. We have too. Does that really make sense?
Think about this reality…
The middle/lower class gets to save 1k in taxes, which is all it will amount to. And those earning $250k annually or more pay another $5-10k per year and lay off to pay for it (nearly 70% of American workers are employed by small businesses)…That is reality economics!
If we elect Obama, this is what I will have to do to pay for more taxes…layoff one of my 5 employees to pay for it. I am hit hard with employer taxes at 25% and personal taxes at 40% I make $300k per year and pay nearly 140k per year in taxes. I employee 5 really good people, but I cannot afford to pay for Obama’s tax plan. I work 70 hours per week, contribute to charities, subsidize health for my employees, have built a strong business, teach my kids to work hard and go to school. I understand there are those less fortunate, but I worked hard to get what I have, I did not choose ARM Loans, I did not pay $0 down for my house, I pay my bills on time and pay my employees very well. There is greed on Wall Street and those who are greedy in buying homes as well.
This is crazy that people are buying that giving my employees 1-2k is really going to help in the long run. What will help is giving me less business taxes, so my employees keep their jobs. You cut my employee taxes, I can ggive an employee a $1-2 raise and that will pay for gas or some extra healthcare…
When are we going to wake up and understand this will kill small businesses and create more hourly employee uncertainty…

Posted by: Economics 101 | September 27, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

who cares who won…everyone on this blog who think raising your taxes on $250k or more will help need to look at history…
this country is built on small business–not big..look at all the businesses you deal with from gas stations to cleaners, etc…
if we are taxed more, that guy above nailed it, we will cut back and that will result in job losses…
if you vote for Obama, you are killing me, a small business owner who will layoff as well…
the majority of tax revenue come from 5% of the nation
the middle class have issues, but getting 1-2k next year under Obama will not help you at all
if you are voting for Obama on this middle class tax issue, you are really not bright.
pick another reason, but taxes will not help…it takes money out of the economy
accept this…rich people make a lot of mmoney because they risk a lot of money aand get rewarded, but that results in the job you have right now…if you are working for someone other than Uncle Sam, you have that job because a rich person risked something to create that job..accept this reality, get over rich people and move on…

Posted by: News Flash: Rich People Create jobs | September 27, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

mccain should not be allowed to be president for many reasons, including his age, his education, he cost the military lots of money because he is an idiot and crashed 2 planes and ran another into power lines, not to mention he was a POW for years. the simple fact that he was a pow should exclude him because he cant be a mentally there. he also picked sarah palin for vice pres. she has got to be the biggest idiot of them all. he foreign policy experience consists of looking at russia from alaska. i wonder she has ever even seen russia from alaska? obama may not be the greatest choice, but he is a damn good one. mccain wants to keep the rich rich and the poor poor. hopefully palin will be allowed to talk more so stupid americans will see how much worse things can get if we elect more republicans.

Posted by: matt | September 27, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

I have a fix for this economic downturn…
Feel free to make your mortgage payments and we would not be debating this at all…
Bad Debtors Suck!!!
If you cannot handle it, do not agree to the loan!

Posted by: Freddie Mac | September 27, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

“Rick Davis, received $15000 per MONTH from Freddie Mac since 2005, as reported last Monday, and McCain hasn’t fired him.”
David like Obama you don’t have a command of the facts or else you purposely deceive. Rick Davis has never consulted for Freddie and Fannie, unlike Obama’s Raines, and has not worked for the company that did, from 2005 when he quit. “Since 2005″ is a blantant LIE, which is why you are supporting Obama. Birds of a feather…

Posted by: freemort | September 27, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

For any of you who think that your tax money is used for anything other than to pay the interest owed the Federal Reserve for all the money the Gov borrows from them, do a little googling on the topic. And while you are doing that check out the fact that the 16th Amendment was never ratified by one single state thereby making our Income Tax totally illegal.

Posted by: DLA | September 27, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Charles A. Lindberg Sr., at the time of the passage of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913:
This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this Act, the invisible government by the Money Power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized. The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation. From now on depressions will be scientifically created.
Today is another sad day for America. Once again, Americans are being forced with a gun to their head to give the fruits of their labor to the international banking cartel via the Internal Revenue Service. This is how slaves have been Made in America. What, you say? “My income taxes provide new roads, education, welfare, coddling illegal aliens and foreign welfare.” Wrong. Space is limited, so I will struggle to give you 15 years worth of research and learning on one short page.
None of your income tax dollars – which you “voluntarily” pay through force and coercion – funds the government. This money, as well as the “withholding” stolen from you all year long, goes to the privately owned “Federal” Reserve Banking System to pay back the money your member of Congress borrowed during the year for a trillion dollars worth of unconstitutional expenditures.

Posted by: DLA | September 27, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Few Americans realize the high cost of that “bacon” to their district. Every penny of income tax dollars collected by the Internal Revenue Service goes to the stockholders of the privately owned “Federal” Reserve to run the central bank and reap their astronomical profits from the sweat off your back. (See: “President’s Private Sector Survey On Cost Control: A Report to The President” [Reagan] Jan. 15, 1984. Available from the Congressional Research Service. The excerpt below can be found on page 12.)
Resistance to additional income taxes would be even more widespread if people were aware that: With two-thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the federal government contributions to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which taxpayers expect from their government.

Posted by: DLA | September 27, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Make IRS check payable to stockholders of private Fed
——————————————————————————–
Posted: April 15, 2005
1:00 am Eastern
By Devvy Kidd
© 2008 WorldNetDaily.com
Stop worry who gets how much tax cut.
Start getting pissed that you are paying an illegal income tax. By the way. The Fed Reserve Bank charges the Gov 34% interest on the $$ it lends it.
The last President who attempted to shut down the Federal Reserve Bank and started to print money, Silver Certificates, was JFK. Look were it got him.

Posted by: DLA | September 27, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Woodrow Wilson ruined our economy by putting it in the hands of the Federal Reserve Bank.

Posted by: DLA | September 27, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

I guess someone forgot to tell these BO groupies that Muslims do not have Messiah’s only profits

Posted by: jubilow | September 27, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

another thing all you obamaites need to know that all the men and women who are in Iraq, joined the military of their own free will, no one forced them, and i can tell you from personal experince of spending 13 months there that all they want to do is get the job done, but with cowards like BO this will never happen, the enemy will sence the weakness and keep pressing, become bolder with each attack.

Posted by: jubilow | September 27, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

before some of you get off on the rant about no weapons of mass distruction, i think you should ask the Kirds about the poison gas that kill over 100,000 to me this is mass distruction, and it is a fact that the chemical factorys that produced it was sill able to produce more, also there has been evedince that some of this equiptment was sent to Syria, before we could get there.

Posted by: jubilow | September 27, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Obama pronounces the word PAKISTAN correctly. Most people in the United States pronounce it with a long a, but that, I believe, is the incorrect pronounciation.

Posted by: Intelligent voter | September 27, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Mccain is a war president. His long family military background, his attitudes about bombing Iran (with song)his constant refrain about “winning”, not a war, but an invasion and occupation in Iraq, make him a war president. Pat Buchanan, a Republican conservative said “Mccain will make Cheney look like Mother Theresa”. So ask yourself…which city should the terrorists take out first? Boston, NY? LA? Miami? Choose. Because if we bomb or invade another country, the terrorists WILL retaliate, so choose.

Posted by: Intelligent voter | September 27, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Was I the only one who noticed that
Obama said that we have been in Iraq for
8 years? Isn’t that a Major Mistake?
Why are the pundits both left and right
ignoring this?
If McCain had said that it would be
front page news for days!

Posted by: reaganfan | September 27, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Actually ( you should have seen this somewhere) when the Dems let the Bush Tax Cuts expire the middle class family will pay $3000-4000 more.
That is schedule to expire in about 1 1/2 years. But when you get into details, you also find your deductions and exemptions go poof under Democrat written tax laws.
——–
Those Lobbyists? Actually FNMA/FHLMC dropped $200 million in the last ten years and hired EVERY LOBBYIST firm in Washington. They were all on the payroll, so no politician can get a real clean lobby firm. Their job was to make sure NO OVERSIGHT or REGULATION was imposed on the Demo-sugarfirms FNMA & FHLMC.

Posted by: BK | September 27, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Ultraconservative: YES.

Posted by: Sally297 | September 27, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

Ultraconservative: Yes. Yahoo or Google “Bailout Obama ACORN” to get the full details.

Posted by: Sally297 | September 27, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

I see that some creep or creepette has stolen my name for three posts. I would suggest that people who read them consider the source, if they can figure it out.
This is one of the many things that makes Blogs so meaningless. Frankly, a moderated forum would be better, or even better, a resurgence of REAL NEWSPAPER REPORTING, coupled with the demise of electronic “journalism”, which has turned into a huge joke.

Posted by: Yavo Lem | September 27, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Ultraconservative: For full details that fully explain the releasing of 20% of the profit from the bailout to Obama’s ACORN.
Lindsay Graham told Fox that the Mother of All Bailouts includes a reported $100 million more in funding for the left-wing housing entitlement thugs and heavily tax-subsidized fraudsters at ACORN. Under the original bailout proposal, apparently, a large portion of any repayment of the $700 billion would go to Barack Obama’s good friends at ACORN with a smaller allocation to debt repayment. Readers heard him say it was 20 percent. http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/25/kill-the-bailout-more-acorn-funding/

Posted by: Sally297 | September 28, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

on 60 min Obama stated that people that make 150k – 250k WILL see an increase and that is just one of many Obamas lies
McCain said look at his and Obamas record and Obama did not. what is Obama scared of “the truth” or the people finding out the truth about him
If you want to compare apples to apples McCain put his out there while Obama interrupted every time McCain pointed out facts about Obama

Posted by: mike | September 28, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Do you know why WALL STREET is doing so good. McCain and the Smiling Senate Members sold your children. A DRAFT is coming. Watch CNN and MSNBC for more. ABC and FOX are Bought out
By GOLDMAN SACHS. Look at the Senators who are smiling for the press.
Looks like a GREEDY Smile. Sold to the cheapest bidder. So Tax money can start again. Ain’t gonna happen. :)
Bruce and Mannie Dalis–Correct Spelling
Micro Computers— Mc
Thank you girls for the correct spelling
of PAC’s contributers.
Mannie…is that like Fannie. mmmmm
:) Thanks GOLD MAN SUCKS.
Lose lips, sink Weapons of Mass Destruction
No To WALL STREET

Posted by: historyremembered | September 28, 2008, 5:36 am 5:36 am

If you have a Satilite dish, Find a Neighbor with a Land Line System.
Turn to CNN and MSNBC
Find out Why You have been Lied to.
No Hurrican?
FIRST Space Walk?
Have you Been living in a Bubble?
Wait till you find out about History.
Find a Neigbor, call a Neighbor with a Land Line
Watch CNN and MSNBC From a Land Line
fox AND abc are Lying to you.
See Fake Hurrican in Maine.
Wait till Later, for More.
Watch WHOLE debate, Never Seen on abc AND fox
See Katrina Left Overs. Looks Pretty Good to Me.
Call fox AND abc and ask WHAT the Heck?
Who made First Spacewalk?
CNN and MSNBC from LandLine
Call Your State Senate Make Vote Today
And Ask Far Out in space Republican WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON…
I’ll have a Book out Later
:)

Posted by: historyremembered | September 28, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

If you have a Satilite dish, Find a Neighbor with a Land Line System.
Turn to CNN and MSNBC
Hold the phone up to the Tv.
Stealth Ship? :)
Ask You Senator WHAT?
Find out Why You have been Lied to.
No Hurrican?
FIRST Space Walk?
Have you Been living in a Bubble?
Wait till you find out about History.
Find a Neigbor, call a Neighbor with a Land Line
Watch CNN and MSNBC From a Land Line
fox AND abc are Lying to you.
See Fake Hurrican in Maine.
Wait till Later, for More.
Watch WHOLE debate, Never Seen on abc AND fox
See Katrina Left Overs. Looks Pretty Good to Me.
Call fox AND abc and ask WHAT the Heck?
Who made First Spacewalk?
CNN and MSNBC from LandLine
Call Your State Senate Make Vote Today
And Ask Far Out in space Republican WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON…
I’ll have a Book out Later
:)

Posted by: historyremembered | September 28, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

David,
Once again another liberal without the facts. Kissinger was on fox Saturday via telephone and stated HIMSELF that he never advocated meetings without preconditions. Another Obama lie.

Posted by: Curtis | September 28, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Somebody help me, a dumb conservative understand this “rich” issue. If you really believe this class warfare nonsense why tax people on income? It is unfair to tax someone who played by the rules, worked hard and started a business or paid their way through school at a much higher level than someone who made poor decisions. Why not tax the wealthy? Everyone with over 2 million in assets loses them to the government every year. I’m sure Ted Kennedy and the Hollywood liberals would agree to this plan. After all, anyone can live comfortably on 2 million in assets, right? Sorry Gates, Oprah, and others, you need to pay YOUR fair share. If we are going to socialism, jump right in, don’t just put one toe in the water.

Posted by: Curtis | September 28, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Why in great tarnation would Obama increase the marriage penalty like that? I thought Congress was working to make the marriage penalty go away….

Posted by: unclesmrgol | September 28, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Democrats promise a utopia to the masses and that is the reason we are in this situation. A lowering of standards for home loans pushed by the Dems Barney Frank, Chris Dodd etc are responsible. Alarms raised by Pres Bush and Sen John McCain went unheeded. Then they have the gall to blame it on Wall St and the Bushes. Sounds like the old Soviet Union say a lie log enough and loud enough and the masses will believe. My vote will be cast for a team that will put this to an end McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Vince | September 28, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

This is an excellent article , I’m grateful to you , thanks a lot .

Posted by: العاب شمس الدين | September 28, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

So Obama is going to punish you for being married. This encourages divorce and that really hurts everyone. So those who are partners really benefit from his plan we should call it the partner tax plan since that is who will benefit while punishing those married to the opposite sex.

Posted by: tim | September 28, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I have negotiated agreements all over the world for nearly 40 years. All I can say is that if Obama was sitting across the table from me I would have to carfully analyize each of his words. i.e. Yes he can give you tax cuts. But how much? A $1.00 reduction in your taxes is a “Tax Cut” and he would be telling the truth. Be careful folks he is not the man I want to watch over my family.

Posted by: Al 155 | September 28, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Hussein Obama is so transparent- oh yeah-but he’s not Bush – lets elecet him.
He believes in change alright- changes his position-past references – and associations as the occasion requires
He will dupe many americans-
Say the pledge Hussein !!!

Posted by: Rev. Wright | September 28, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

So mcCain lied about this and Mccain lied about that, and no one can supply any evidence to back up these silly claims. I will say one thing, McCain did not lie when he said Obama did not have the experience to be President. For a Senator, with just 4 years of Washington experience to be elected to the White House is like taking the company janitor and making him CEO.
This little weasel from Chicago, who hasen’t worked an honest day in his life is selling the voters snake oil from the back of his SUV.
Richard Nixon has the support of the “silent majority”, well McCain has the support of another “silent majority”, who will speak out on November 4th.
Get ready for the cable channel to discuss “what went wrong with Obama’s campaign” for the 6 months after the election.

Posted by: John | September 29, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

There’s no confusion. It is $200,000 per person or $250,000 per couple. So, what? At least, he plans to give an overwhelming majority of Americans tax cuts even if it is 75% instead of 95%. In contrast, McCain wants to give the rich more tax cuts which he strongly opposed in since 2000 until recently.
leigh:
Those are correct pronunciation of “Pakistan” and “Taliban”. Unfortunately, most of us tend to mispronounce foreign names. In this context, Europeans especially the British tend to pronounce foreign names correctly.

Posted by: Azar | October 25, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

The Obama crowd fails to realize if you tax the “rich,” the poor will be the ones to ultimately pay. Obama’s definition of Rich is scary. I am a consultant for small to medium sized business (which are the ones that will be taxed the most).These business owners will ultimately have to pass the costs along to keep the doors open. How will they do that? Cut costs: fire the most expendable people (probably voting for Obama), reduce expense accounts for their sales reps(no more dining out= your tax free tips will be non-existent), won’t buy that much needed truck for his service force: the sales rep down @ the dealership will be looking for a job, the company that makes the tool boxes for the back wont have more orders so he will lay off guys too. He’ll also have to cut down on some expenses at home. The mobile car wash guy is out, the Saturday lunch with fam at Cheesecake is off, no more trips to Vegas. Don’t be so short-minded. It will affect you people who depend on tips & going to school or just getting your first job more than any other demographic. So, go ahead- vote Obama, & keep thinking its the change we need. You’ll soon be working in the peace corps so Obama will help you go back to college & get a real job.

Posted by: american | October 29, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.