Game On: Here Come the Votes
Pennsylvanians serving in the military may have completed the task already. Kentuckians and North Carolinians can start any time now. And in the next week or so people in up to a dozen more states can go ahead and be done with it.
Voting for president, that is.
The political world may be focused on Election Day, Nov. 4, but balloting already is beginning in the 2008 presidential election. The vehicle – absentee voting – is a growing and potentially transformational phenomenon in American politics; in 2004 more than one in five voters cast their ballots before Election Day actually arrived.
It can make a dramatic difference in campaign strategies. A knockout punch in the debates won’t matter a whit to people who’ve already cast their ballots, and last-minute appeals make no difference at all to first-minute voters. And they’re coming. Like now.
Absentee ballots became available yesterday in Kentucky and North Carolina, according to election officials in both states. For some military voters the gates opened even earlier; in Pennsylvania, the secretary of state’s office says county officials were required as of Aug. 26 to start mailing ballots to overseas service members in “extremely remote or isolated areas” who’ve requested them. That can include Iraq, where the U.S. Postal Service says delivery takes 7 to 10 days. (Ballots go out to other Pennsylvanians overseas starting Friday, while those here in the states have to wait until Oct. 21.)
More are coming, soon. A summary prepared by The Associated Press for the National Election Pool, the media group that tallies votes on Election Day, says absentee ballots should start to become available in nine more states by the end of this week. Five more states should follow anywhere from Sunday through Tuesday, with more coming.
The rules on absentee voting vary from highly restrictive to wide open, all the way to Oregon, where all voting is by mail. Twenty-eight other states have unconditional absentee voting, seven more have relatively loose rules (including Washington, D.C.) and 15 have strict ones.
There are other ways to go: Nineteen states also allow “in-person absentee voting,” starting anywhere from 30 to as many as 45 days before Election Day in Maine (depending on when ballots are printed), six weeks before Election Day in South Dakota and 40 days before Election Day in Iowa and Wyoming. (This allows you to drop off a completed absentee ballot at a county election office.) Seventeen states also make arrangements for early voting (using voting machines set up early at satellite polling places); that starts as soon as Oct. 2 in Arizona and Oct. 6 in California.
It all adds up. That AP summary says 21.9 percent of votes cast for president in 2004 were absentee or early votes, up from 15.7 percent in 2000 – more than 26 million votes, soaring as high as 68.8 percent of the total in Washington state, 53.1 percent in Nevada and 51.1 percent in Texas. Among anticipated battleground states, absentees accounted for 50.6 percent of voters in New Mexico, 47.8 percent in Colorado and 36.2 percent in Florida, though many fewer in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
How they voted isn't perfectly known, but absentees sure can make a difference. In our final pre-election tracking poll in 2004, 15 percent of “likely” voters in fact said they’d already voted (our estimate did not include any overseas absentees). They divided by 53-45 percent between George W. Bush and John Kerry, compared with a dead-even 48-48 percent race among the rest.
This year absentee voting could go even higher. Which is why, if the candidates seem to be running like there’s no tomorrow, that’s because, for some voters, there is.
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Good news for those ahead in the polls if a significant number of people vote early. That, of course, includes McCain/Palin. Bad news for the shallow one.
Posted by: dl | September 16, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
I predict big time voter fraud on the Obama side. He learned dirty Chicago poitics and how to screw Alice Palmer out of a victory. Check out his ties to ACORN. I heard a pundit say this election will make the Bush/Gore/Florida debacle look like a tea party and could very well take a month before all is settled and we really know who got what votes. I just feel the Axlerod/Obama machine is primed and ready to cheat.
Posted by: Debra | September 16, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
we all know taht history ahs showen us that all teh republicans know how to do in a election is cheat…bush had his brother cheat for him in florida in 2000. he lied and cheated by teh swiftboat crap to win in 2004… so i know obama and his team are watching the most evil political party in the history of man the republicans to make sure they dont cheat.
Posted by: tom | September 16, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
A Serious Cover-Up
William Ayers founded the CAC (Chicago Annenberg Challenge) in the 1990′s and Barack Hussein Obama chaired it in the 1990′s. They worked together closely. William Ayers would only have chosen someone who fit his own ideology.
Obama stated to America “The notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values doesn’t make much sense.” Why lie to the American public? Obama worked closely with William Ayers and even chaired the CAC founded by Ayers in the 1990’s.
Posted by: Mike | September 16, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
It’s amazing to me that the only ones ever caught cheating in an election is the Republicans, yet they can’t help themselves (standard operating procedure) from pointing fingers everywhere else.
Posted by: CMSgt Gary Preston | September 16, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
dl— yes i am sore the economy is crashed we went from budget surplus and no national debt to 400 billion over budget and a 9 trillion dollar debt. we are in a illegal war that never should have been waged. ye sme and 70% of america are sore and we will show the evil empire republicans this fall by throwing them out on there butts.
Posted by: tom | September 16, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
so good obama just hammered mcbush on cnn. why would we elect a guy taht by his word voted 90% of the time with bush the guy that got us in this horrible economy. how is mccain going to clean up all the greed and profiterring?? by giving the rich greedy a tax cut…that is os out of touch the last 8 years the rich have been raping america now i say let them pay for the mess they made.
Posted by: tom | September 16, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
I just don’t understand how Obama can be tied or behind in the polls and he’s raised at least 4 times the money McCain has?
It’s really too bad Hillary didn’t win the Democratic nomination. The experience issue with Obama is too strong and with Hillary it would’ve been mute.
They have such similar ideologies but the mud slinging from Obama supporters towards Hillary was so divisive. I, for one, as a WV native was so put off by the durogatory comments made about us West Virginians when Hillary won WV.
If Hillary had won the ticket we would’ve knocked this one out of the park. Now, it’s just not looking good.
Posted by: MajorTom | September 16, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Of all the comments on this election I have yet to see one factor that I believe is of prime importance to our country. John McCain is an old man of 72 years (so am I). He has had health problems more than once. There is a real possibility that if elected he will die in office. This leaves his Vice President as our President. Has anyone actually considered this prospect? If not why not. It is important. Is she ready to be and capable of being our Commander in Chief?
Surely it is not indelicate to bring this up. Our future rides on just such important questions. Palin may be a woman and a headliner but she is not able here.
Posted by: JIM | September 16, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
I’m surprised by the comments made on this post by republicans, you claim Obama is a “newbie socialist” or a “shallow” candidate and yet you people leave these disgusting remarks. Its people like you who make this country terrible, people like you who claim to have a sense of knowlege yet you rant and rave like a child. America should be a place of free democratic ideals in a competent manner otherwise we are just once again the laghing stalk of the world
Posted by: Bob | September 16, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
It seems strange to me that we want to blame the President (Democrat or Republican) for the economy. Congress controls the money. How much were you paying for gas 2 years ago before the Dems took control of both house of Congress what was unemployment then how was the stock market then?? If you realy want change we need to change congress. I wish we had 3 strong parties so they would have to work together and not stone wall each other but we don’t.
Posted by: Don | September 16, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
tom- If the polls and other indications are even close to true you may have to way 4 to 8 years to through the Rep. out. Sorry this was the Dems year and it looks like they have blown it again. They blew it in 2004, oh yes they want to claim cheating and so on so on but the true fact is they lost. If they do this year they got only themself to blame. If Hillary had been the canidate then I think it might have been a lot different. Also take a look at the Senate and congress polls these are the ones that really matter, the Dems are losing ground fast in this also. So breath deep and wait for 4 to 8 years. Then you better find someone good cause they are going to be up against Palin who may carry it then. Have a very nice day.
Posted by: Robert | September 17, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
tom- Me again, Please do me a favor, do not bring JFK up in the same light as you do Obama. If JFK was alive today he would be closer to the Reps then the Dems. Take a look at his policies and you will find that he was not even close with the Dems. but very close to the Rep. This is why I left the Dem party gone to far and I mean far left.
Posted by: Robert | September 17, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Don said: “It seems strange to me that we want to blame the President (Democrat or Republican) for the economy. Congress controls the money.”
Yes, but the regulatory agencies of government report to the Executive Branch. The President met this week with the Working Group on Financial Markets. This group is make up of the Treasury Secretary and the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve and the Security and Exchange Commission. They meet infrequently and always in reaction to financial crisis, not proactively to avert potential crises. They have had access to internal data and reports that for years have been warning that the nation’s and the world’s investment capital have been becoming more and more saturated with junk loan (Subprime) derivatives. The said nothing. They did nothing.
These agencies have regulatory responsibilities. They are supposed to look out for the public’s interests. But over the years, and especially during the past eight, we have seen the concept of regulation turned on its head. Industry insiders are appointed to head the agencies that are supposed to regulate them. Regulators seem to be more concerned with protecting the interests of the industries they are supposed to regulate than with the public interest. Lobbyists from industry are actually writing regulatory policies. Legislators eviscerate regulations, then leave office and take high paying jobs in the industry they were writing laws for.
It’s not just the financial markets. It’s been energy, mining, health care, pharmaceuticals, the environment… the list goes on.
Congress can pass regulatory laws, but what happens when the regulators don’t enforce them? Congress has oversight responsibilities, but how many times have we seen efforts to perform oversight of the Executive Branch been stymied and stonewalled over the years. Committee rules and tactics have made oversight all but impossible when there is determined opposition.
McCain says he wants to clean up the corruption in Washington. What does that really mean?
There was a blowup between Obama and McCain when they tried to work bipartisanly on ethics reform. It was outlined in a series of letters between them. The Democrats had a bill they wanted to send directly to committee hearings. McCain said, it has to go to a task force first, for further study.
Just this week, McCain response to the financial crisis is to create a committee to study the problem. Is that what he means by maverick reformer?
Posted by: JoeC | September 17, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
I’m sorry for going so far off topic. I keep forgetting …
“This election is not about issues”
Rick Davis, McCain Campaign Manager
Posted by: JoeC | September 17, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Google Obama and ACORN….there is a piece about Obama and Voter fraud in the Detroit paper today…..this will be the worst in history….count on it.
Posted by: Debra | September 17, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am
The US economy has sucked since 9/11. Everyone tries to say it is Bush’s fault – it really is not.
US needs Oil bad and innovative energy solutions in a hurry if they want to get their economy back on track.
Bickering about tax structure A vs. tax structure B is frivolous. It makes little difference – and the arguments on both sides are just smoke and mirrirs.
Seriously – the Republicans strategy for dealing with energy and the war on terror is most appealling.
Palin seems to understand this the most.
Posted by: s mebep | September 17, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Why do some Republicans resort to name calling rather than discussing the issues. It’s childish and mean spirited. I won’t vote for McCain because I disagree with him on issues. If you don’t like Obama’s ideas, fair enough…. but adhominem attacks say more about your character than the character of the person you’re attacking! Be civil!
Posted by: Hallie | September 17, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
McCain had a small boost after the convention which gradually evaporated. With Fannie, Freddie, Lehman, AIG, Merrill Lynch going down the tube Obama got a huge advantage now. For next 6 weeks, worry about economy will be front and center and will result in a big Obama win. It seems that Obama will take Ohio, Virginia and North Carolina. That is massive.
Posted by: SP | September 17, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Obama…all the way!!!!!!
Posted by: mary | September 17, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Great news for Obama. Bad news for Rep’s. Rep’s better not stop votes from voting this election. To many lawyers on hand this year so Rep’s can’t turn away voters.
Posted by: Mrs Ethel | September 18, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am
I was going to vote for Obama but know I’m voting for Sarah Palin. She is the only one that truly represent the middle class people. The democrat seems to be talking to much with no substance. Go Sarah Palin the next vice president of the US !!
Posted by: mar | September 18, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
mar – do you realize American soldiers are fighting currently and have fought and DIED for your right to vote? And to vote for Palin because you think you can relate to her is to laugh in the face of these soldiers and their sacrifice. You are not thinking clearly. You’re not. You are making an emotional vote and not an objective one. Palin brings nothing to this election except an American Idol like quality, which while exciting, evaporates quickly. Barack has talked about nothing but substance — you just haven’t been listening. By the way – Palin and McCain (remember, McCain, the guy running for president??) represent THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF EVERYTHING THAT WILL BE GOOD FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS. mar – I care about you and people like you and I don’t want them to make the biggest mistake of their lives, and the lives of children who will come after us. Please, for God’s sake, stop and think clearly about who you are voting for and why.
Posted by: Adam | September 18, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Well looks like Obama is ahead by 2 points on CNN and Gallup. Basically the conclusion, polls mean nothing and voters keep switching. Only 10% of Americans are still undecided and those will wait until Nov 4 to vote, after Obama obliterates McCain and Biden squashes Palin.
Isnt it funny Palin is trying to stall the trooper probe past Nov 4? Republicans really are evil.
Posted by: Ricky | September 18, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
I predict big time voter fraud on the McCain side. He learned dirty Washinton poitics and how to screw everybody out of a victory. Check out his ties to Bush. I heard a pundit say this election will make the Bush/Gore/Florida debacle look like a tea party and could very well take a month before all is settled and we really know who got what votes.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
mar- take it from a republican, Sarah can not and has not spoken for herself yet. As for middle class. did’nt she just hock a plane for 600,000 dollars? I guess not to many middle class people have a plane.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 18, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
s mebep-Obama wants to exercise all energy forms. Wind, solar, hydro. These will create more jobs than a few oil rigs. And he’s more concerned with long term effects on the environment than McCains oil buddies. Palin is shallow. I just hope one day I can lift my head and say I am a Republican again. But so far I am siding with Obama and Biden for the future of our children. 5% of big businesses rule 95% of America. Just look at the Energy lobbiest right now. You can be a Free Thinking Liberal Republican. They also tend to think about change.But to being to Conservative can keep you in a rut.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 18, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
McCain is going to have to cheat his way into the white house because there is no way he’ll earn it fair and square!
Posted by: bea | September 18, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
OBAMA/BIDEN 08′ Because we all know the ending to the last 8 years!
Posted by: timesuprepubs | September 18, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
Lets see Obama will increase taxes for the top 1% (making over 600k a year) by an average of 96k a year, or McCain which will decrease the taxes for the wealthiest 1% (making over 600k a year) by an average of 48k (an 8% pay raise). Give me the socialist view any day!!
OBAMA/BIDEN 08′
Posted by: timesuprepubs | September 18, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
The POLL of POLLS now has OBAMA/BIDEN ahead by 3% 47 to 44. BYE BYE MCSAME/FLAVOR OF THE WEEK..
Posted by: timesuprepubs | September 18, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
I don’t know why people is so dumb predicting some ones dead, without thinking that God is the only one who knows when is going to be our day. Who knows that the people is saying that Mccain is going to died in Office, is going to go firt?. Who knows if Obama is going to die first than Mccain?
Posted by: DD | September 19, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
My fellow Americans, what has happened to accountability? Millions of Americans have suffered due to an administration and party that has put their interest before the American people. Where I come from its simple, your party had 8 years and they failed horribly and have let the American people down. The Reps have failed us in all facets 8 strikes your out!!!
Posted by: Vance | September 19, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Ok so I have read all of the recent posts and cannot believe what I am reading. Where has the respect for another person gone? Why are there so many personal attacks?
At one time we were a nation of the people, by the people and for the people. JFK in his presidential address stated, “ask not what your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country.” He also states
“Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us.” Seems we need some edumacating.
The predicament we are all in, from the war, to our economy, falls directly on all of our shoulders. Both republicans and democrats, you and I. Both parties share equally in the mess we are in, as well as the people that elected them. Stand up and be accountable for your actions! An election should be about the issues and which candidate more closely REPRESENTS your views, not what is listed in a personal email account or what a guy’s middle name is. The thing you should all do is to vote for the person that most closely resembles your point of view…for me, McCain and Palin…you got my vote. Do I agree with everything you represent, absolutely not. But at least you have the conviction to stand behind what you believe in.
Posted by: MB | September 19, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Why is Obama’s Health Care Plan better?
For starters it’s because McCain doesn’t have one. Now for the rest of the story:
The big threat to growth in the next decade is not oil or food prices, but the rising cost of health care. The doubling of health insurance premiums since 2000 makes employers choose between cutting benefits and hiring fewer workers.
Rising health costs push total employment costs up and wages and benefits down. The result is lost profits and lost wages, in addition to pointless risk, insecurity and a flood of personal bankruptcies.
APSustained growth thus requires successful health-care reform. Barack Obama and John McCain propose to lead us in opposite directions — and the Obama direction is far superior.
Sen. Obama’s proposal will modernize our current system of employer- and government-provided health care, keeping what works well, and making the investments now that will lead to a more efficient medical system. He does this in five ways:
- Learning. One-third of medical costs go for services at best ineffective and at worst harmful. Fifty billion dollars will jump-start the long-overdue information revolution in health care to identify the best providers, treatments and patient management strategies.
- Rewarding. Doctors and hospitals today are paid for performing procedures, not for helping patients. Insurers make money by dumping sick patients, not by keeping people healthy. Mr. Obama proposes to base Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements to hospitals and doctors on patient outcomes (lower cholesterol readings, made and kept follow-up appointments) in a coordinated effort to focus the entire payment system around better health, not just more care.
- Pooling. The Obama plan would give individuals and small firms the option of joining large insurance pools. With large patient pools, a few people incurring high medical costs will not topple the entire system, so insurers would no longer need to waste time, money and resources weeding out the healthy from the sick, and businesses and individuals would no longer have to subject themselves to that costly and stressful process.
- Preventing. In today’s health-care market, less than one dollar in 25 goes for prevention, even though preventive services — regular screenings and healthy lifestyle information — are among the most cost-effective medical services around. Guaranteeing access to preventive services will improve health and in many cases save money.
- Covering. Controlling long-run health-care costs requires removing the hidden expenses of the uninsured. The reforms described above will lower premiums by $2,500 for the typical family, allowing millions previously priced out of the market to afford insurance.
In addition, tax credits for those still unable to afford private coverage, and the option to buy in to the federal government’s benefits system, will ensure that all individuals have access to an affordable, portable alternative at a price they can afford.
Given the current inefficiencies in our system, the impact of the Obama plan will be profound. Besides the $2,500 savings in medical costs for the typical family, according to our research annual business-sector costs will fall by about $140 billion. Our figures suggest that decreasing employer costs by this amount will result in the expansion of employer-provided health insurance to 10 million previously uninsured people.
We know these savings are attainable: other countries have them today. We spend 40% more than other countries such as Canada and Switzeraland on health care — nearly $1 trillion — but our health outcomes are no better.
The lower cost of benefits will allow employers to hire some 90,000 low-wage workers currently without jobs because they are currently priced out of the market. It also would pull one and a half million more workers out of low-wage low-benefit and into high-wage high-benefit jobs. Workers currently locked into jobs because they fear losing their health benefits would be able to move to entrepreneurial jobs, or simply work part time.
In contrast, Sen. McCain, who constantly repeats his no-new-taxes promise on the campaign trail, proposes a big tax hike as the solution to our health-care crisis. His plan would raise taxes on workers who receive health benefits, with the idea of encouraging their employers to drop coverage. A study conducted by University of Michigan economist Tom Buchmueller and colleagues published in the journal Health Affairs suggests that the McCain tax hike will lead employers to drop coverage for over 20 million Americans.
What would happen to these people? Mr. McCain will give them a small tax credit, $5,000 for a family and $2,500 for an individual, and tell them to navigate the individual insurance market on their own.
For middle- and lower-income people, the credits are way too small. They are less than half the cost of policies today ($12,000 on average for a family), and are far below the 75% that most employers offering coverage contribute. Further, their value would erode over time, as the credit increases less rapidly than average premiums.
Those already sick are completely out of luck, as individual insurers are free to deny coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Mr. McCain has proposed a high-risk pool for the very sick, but has not put forward the money to make it work.
Even for those healthy enough to gain coverage in the individual insurance market, the screening, marketing and individual underwriting that insurers do to separate healthy from sick boosts premiums by 17% relative to employer-provided insurance, well beyond the help offered by the McCain tax credit.
The immediate consequences of the McCain plan are even worse. The McCain plan is a big tax increase on employers and workers. With the economy in recession, that’s the last thing America’s businesses need.
Finally, Mr. McCain does nothing to bend the curve of rising health-care costs downward. He does not fund investments in learning, rewarding and preventing. Eliminating state coverage requirements will slash preventive service availability.
The high cost-sharing plans he envisions will similarly discourage preventive care. And as he does nothing about the hidden costs of the uncovered — expensive ER visits, recurring conditions resulting from inadequate follow-up care.
Everyone agrees our health-care financing system must change. But only one candidate, Barack Obama, has real change we can believe in.
Posted by: indevoter | September 19, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Gallup is the one to watch. They have been doing this for about 70 years and in the last presidential election they had Bush over Kerry by 2.5% and guess what? Bush beat Kerry by 2.5%. Gallup uses a minimum of 1000, and usually it’s about 3000+.
Here is the latest Gallup poll:
Gallup Tracking 09/16 – 09/18 2796 RV Obama 49 / McCAIN 44 (Obama +5)
Posted by: indevoter | September 19, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
As a single working mother of three kids under 13 years old, and as a resident of west palm beach, florida. I am amazed that anyone who works for a living and never gets ahead, food prices going up, rent, gas, electric, water. I have been turned down by this government for food stamps to help ease this pain I feel week after week and it seems no is listening. I am a Hillary Clinton supporter, therefore I am an Obama supporter. These republicans say they care about us poor people….they do nothing but lie right to our faces and offer no real hope for those of us who struggle just to fight another day. I used to be a faithful person, but these last eight years have changed my views drastically. Real folks are concerned about feeding and sheltering their families, not about abortion rights. Is John McCain he best the republicans could scrape up. I will end this by saying that I was, a Reagan Democrat who cannot believe what these guys have done to our beautiful, imperfect America? Did they move it to Alaska and forget to tell the rest of us?
Go Obama Go…..
Posted by: Joanne | September 20, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Let me get this out of the way first: I support Obama-Biden.
But I have to agree with a McCain-Palin supporter — attacking each other is not productive. This election is important, but not as important as the serious issues our country faces. If we divide along partisan lines, those issues could overwhelm us.
Every Obama-Biden supporter, and every McCain-Palin supporter, wants what’s best for America. We want a strong economy and a safe, healthy nation. We want America to be as great, or better yet, greater, for future generations as it has been for us. We all agree on the goals. Where we differ is on how to reach them, and surely we can work together on that.
Do your homework on the candidates and the issues. Decide for yourself who you want in the next administration. And don’t berate people who come to a different conclusion than yours.
America needs a strong Democratic Party and a strong Republican Party, both focused on the good of the country, both competing to formulate the best plans to improve America. It’s the all-American spirit of innovation through competition.
Before you attack someone who supports the “other side,” remember that you’re really on the same side — our country’s side. Think about how you would feel if someone tried to take away that person’s right to vote for whomever they chose.
Posted by: Stephen | September 20, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I’m sorry for McBushers out there, but I have taken close notice this round at both canidates. I’m probably one of few that actually understands Obama’s economic plan, because I didn’t try to over complicate a simple statement. As I have watch McBush over the last few months I have some questions about his mental state. Him babbling on the other day about fish swimming around oil rigs. YIKES!! Refering to Spain as Latin America? Then when corrected called them an Adversary? Not knowing how many houses he owns? And his “educated guess” he made with his speach on Friday 09/19/08, hmmmm I think I have heard that before about preditory lenders starting this colaps in the housing market. Oh yeah Obama has been saying it for over a year now.
Posted by: Charles | September 21, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am
I will be voting in Illinois on October 14th – all registered voters in Illinois are eligible.
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: Theresa, Joliet, IL | September 21, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
There we the business owners who always voted republican, for obvious reasons, and there were the workers who always voted democratic, again for obvious reasons. There was that group that wasn’t voting, the religious group. In a historical move, the republicans campaigned TO THEM, saying if you were a Christian, you’d better not vote for a democrat. Hence, the religious right. Christians, in their devout nature to be loyal, go vote for republicans…..why? They are probably less religious a group than any other group in America. They do not love their fellow man, deport them, no health care, low wages, selfish, uncharitable, indecent profits, indecent behaviors,….what more do Christians need to see to make their minds up for themselves? Don’t they see they have been used, abused, duped, and laughed at by the “real” republicans? I am a Christian but I am a worker. I will vote for Obama so he can formulate policy to help my fellow Americans even though at times I wonder if they understand ….. they are willing to take the Social Security, the employer-paid health care, the 40-hour week won by the unions, the GI benefits, student loans, and on and on, but they unwittingly bite the hand that feeds them by voting for the party that has fought against all these hard won benefits. Wake up Christians!!
Posted by: Sharon | September 21, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
I don’t understand women who supported Hillary now saying that they will vote for McCain because of Sarah Palin. Don’t they realize that these two are opposed for everything Hillary stood for? If you watched the debates you would know how close Hillary and Obama were on the issues; so, how could you deny that and vote for McCain/Palin? The ones who really stand for family values are those who would do more to help families with tax cuts for the middles class and a health care program that works for all Americans not one that would tax those health care benefits that families are already receiving like McCain’s plan would.
Posted by: Melissa | September 21, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Of course, as a woman in the White House,but not just any woman. Palin does not respresent many women I know.Please,ladies, think, read, pay attention to the truth. I had considered voting for McCain BEFORE he made the rash decision to select Palin. He’s energized, all right, but ends up misrepresenting the truth and putting forth a bravado that’s not backed up by facts. THINK, WOMEN, THINK. Does Palin REALLY represent you?
I like her glasses, but that’s about it, once I did a bit of reseearch. We are counting on American women to stand up and do the right thing. Most of us are not racist and most of us are caring individuals. Don’t follow a man off the cliff…use your right to vote and vote for Obama, a man who truly respects women…he doesn’t just use them and then throw them aside…he doesn’t cheat on the woman who gave him 2 beatiful girls. He’s proud of his wife, not because of her money, but becuse of her mind. If we use our minds and don’t allow the mistreatment so prevalent among our men, we’ll vote for Obama.
Posted by: SHARON | September 22, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
JoeC,
We aren’t talking about Bush here. We are talking about McCain and Obama. McCain stood up 2 years ago and said that Fannie May and the other lenders needed oversight. When the Democrats took control they took the oversight off lenders to help the poor get loans for homes. Joe Biden was one of the sponsors and of course Obama stood on the sidelines as a cheerleader! Get your facts straight before you open your mouth!
Since Obama has been a candidate the Demo’s have turned to lying to try to get him elected.
Posted by: TOM | September 22, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
i think mccain has more experience then obama but everyone has there own opinion so don’t take me personally but Mccain rules wooooooooo hooooooooo
Posted by: priya | September 22, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
i think mcclain was an better person than he went and pick palin mccain you lost my vote now i am democratic palin just lies and your party lies for her
Posted by: charles | September 22, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
It really is funny to hear republicans prattle about socialism. The story to americans laid off due to global competitition was that creative destruction is great.
Now that it’s corporate america they are all lining up to get bailed out by us the taxpayers. We should show them the same consideration they showed us.
it’s time for creative destruction to clear out every republican who stuck with the mantra that deregulation and tax breaks for the rich was going to be good for us.
Posted by: Citizen Voter | September 23, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Republicans will not count absentee votes for obama, don’t even bother. they didnt count them in ga either.
Posted by: I | September 23, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Republicans must pay. Time to clean house, america..this is why we vote. I know everyone blogging here has made up their minds i’ve already voted for obama so let’s see what happens. Hopefully, the better man ( one wife, family, doesn’t lie constantly, and cares about the poor) will win. If not we’ll all be paying for it like we are now with bush, and i for one will be boycotting and not spending one dime on anything except food, house, utilities, and transportation.
Posted by: I | September 23, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Does no one remember what the Presidents approvel rate was before the democratic party took control of congress? The economy was strong, business was booming, then congress changed, and the farleft liberal media, most of all TV opinion anchors started telling is it was all the Presidents fault? We will ALL pay if congress doesen’t start working for citizens of the USA instead of aginst us. It is congress that runs or ruins this country.
Posted by: Gregg | September 24, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am