By Jennifer Parker

Sep 3, 2008 2:56pm

DeLay: Unlike Obama, Palin Sees Baby as ‘Blessing,’ Not ‘Punishment’

ABC News’ Jennifer Parker reports: Tom DeLay and Dennis Hastert — who epitomized the Republican establishment in Congress during much of the Bush administration — heaped praise on Sen. John McCain’s vice presidential pick, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, Wednesday, arguing she is changing the image of Republican conservatives like themselves. 

"We are not the image the media has created," former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, told ABCNews.com in an interview at the Republican convention. "People are seeing through her who we really are."

Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert said of Palin’s speech tonight, "I’m looking for her to be her," he said. "I want the American people to see a real conservative principled leader."

DeLay, who is now under indictment on money laundering charges, was dubbed "The Hammer" for his effective arm-twisting and disciplined whipping of Republican votes in the House of Representatives as majority leader between 2002 and 2006. He blasted "the left" for media coverage of Palin’s 17-year-old daughter’s pregnancy.

DeLay seized on comments made by Democratic nominee Sen. Barack Obama when he argued in March that people on both side of the abortion debate can agree on the need to reduce teen pregnancies, noting, "Obama said … a baby is a punishment. To Gov. Palin, a baby is a blessing. That’s a huge contrast that will strike with the American people."

DeLay was referring to comments made by Obama at a Pennsylvania town hall in March when he said,  "Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old … I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at age 16, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information."

Obama and his running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, are in favor of comprehensive sexual education that includes information on abstinence and birth control, while McCain and Palin favor abstinence programs, rather than explicit sexual education.

"The American people are seeing the hypocrisy of the left who’s trying to force her back into the kitchen," said DeLay, now the co-founder of the Coalition for a Conservative Majority trying to get more conservatives elected to Congress.  "It’s an incredible debate that’s been going on over the last five days, and we’re winning."

DeLay said Palin agrees with Republican conservatives on the "deep philosophical cultural issues" that resonate with the Republican base, including support for gun rights and opposition to abortion.

"It’s real life issues, and Gov. Palin represents all of those things," DeLay said. "I mean, she is a woman who lives out her principles.  Frankly, watching the decisions she’s having to make with her family over the last few months, and the contrast between her and Obama and Biden, is absolutely amazing."

Hastert argued the Democrats are "deathly afraid" of Palin.

"In her speech tonight, she gets to identify who she is," Hastert said. "I think they’re deathly afraid of Sarah Palin because of who she is, who she represents: the American family.

"They would like to lay out that we’re a bunch of white men running this party, and all of a sudden, there is a woman who is successful, who is becoming the number two person in the party, and I think they’re threatened," Hastert said.

The former lawmakers were swarmed by media today as they walked separately through "radio row" at the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn.

They appeared together on the conservative radio show "The Wilkow Report" for over 20 minutes.

Asked whether Republican support for McCain and Palin is an eschewing of the brand of conservative politics Hastert and DeLay represented, the former House speaker told ABC News, "I think the American psyche has changed, they’re looking for something else … They’re looking for reform, and John McCain’s going to offer it, and that’s what the American people are going to get."

Of his indictment on money laundering charges, DeLay said, "I can’t get to court. … R. Kelly got through his indictment and trial faster than I’ve been able to."

User Comments

did hastert really call her principaled
has he not seen the facts coming out of Alaska since she was announced…

Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Does Tom Delay REALLY mean that unwanted babies are a blessing?
What happened to the old rule of “If you don’t want an abortion, don’t have one?” Why should every woman be forced to make the same choice? That sounds undemocratic to me.

Posted by: Joel | September 3, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Many of the “sexist” comments and questions that have come up about Palin and motherhood are coming from McCain/Palin’s own far right base. Dr. Laura’s BLOG today is a perfect example.
http://www.drlaurablog.com/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-and-motherhood/

Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

The baby is the one that is usually punished by have a child for a mother. 75% of teenage marriages end in divorce. Not all pregnant teenagers have supportive parents or parents with the resources to help their daughter.
Obama never said he would want an abortion for his daughter. For all the people that are going to repeat the Republican lies:
Obama and ‘Infanticide’ August 25, 2008
The facts about Obama’s votes against ‘Born Alive’ bills in Illinois.
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/obama_and_infanticide.html

Posted by: Julie | September 3, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

NMP, yes, but it’s YOU guys who have always been opposed to sexism.
So it’s odd coming from you guys. Just like when the intolerance comes from your (so-called “tolerant”) party.
By the way, almost every rumor about Palin has been debunked. Even the NYT had to issue a retraction today, and WaPo will have to issue one tomorrow.
Fun, fun, fun.

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

obama is a baby killer. good spin though.

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Yes, Obama said he wouldn’t want his daughters to be “punished” with a baby.
I heard it – we all heard it. Don’t bother trying to spin it away.
By the way, the rabid liberal media and Obamabots have ENSURED that the Palin speech will be watched by millions. It will be hilarious if it’s surpassed by the ones who saw Obamas!
Thanks libs! :)

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

More noise from the Republicans. Instead of looking introspectively to the hypocrisy of their response to the news of Palin’s preganancy they choose to attack. That is all Republicans no how to do. And Tom DeLay is the biggest of them all,,,

Posted by: indy_voter | September 3, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

This freaken baby is not the issue here it is her ,,,,,She is NOT fit to run this country Obama said kids off limits what part of that don’t you understand or are you trying to cause trouble???????People like you should not even be quoted…;.

Posted by: indp voter | September 3, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

You know I would not want my daughter at that age to be burdened with a kid ,they are kids themselves….wowow welcome to the real world how long will this last any one wannnnnna bet?????Won’t be long

Posted by: me | September 3, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Obama strongly support legislation of infanticide act. What else do you need to know about him?

Posted by: george | September 3, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

Julie
What in the world do you read and where in the world do you hide. I appears you don’t have a clue about what Obama says or doesn’t say. Does your mama tell you what you think?

Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

DeLay is such a disgrace.

Posted by: dem in chicago | September 3, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

obama is a baby killer and wants punish babies
lol what?
it must really suck trying to figure out a way to get off this horrible vp pick story

Posted by: Bhrandon | September 3, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Yes, kids and spouses are off limits.
However, it is perfectly OK for the Obama campaign to hammer on the number of houses that Cindy McCain’s family owns any time they feel like it……..

Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Abortion (code name ‘right to choose’) is the hallmark of the democratic party any more. They would rather terminate a viable fetus than give it a chance for a potentially rewarding life simply because it’s too much trouble to nurture. There’s not another characteristic feature of the democrats that defines the party any more than does abortion.

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

What really worries me about Palin is her environmental policies (especially in regards to drilling in the ANWR). Given the state of our environment these days I think it is evermore important for us, as consumers to support ‘green businesses’ that benefit the environment. For example, http://www.simplestop.net stops your postal junk mail and benefits the environment.

Posted by: Clark | September 3, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Clark
Maybe aborted fetuses should be buried in green cardboard coffins???

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Meg Whitman, McCain’s national campaign co-chair and former CEO of e-Bay, veered off message today in an interview with Fox News, describing the media vetting of Palin as “completely fair” and saying that there hasn’t really been any sexism to speak of in the coverage.

Posted by: Bhrandon | September 3, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Bhrandon
Are all people from Saint Louis as narrow-minded as you? Or, is it just the way Leo’s are?

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Palin is pro-fro.
Pro- fornication.
Palin is pro under-aged drinking.
Are you sure she wasn’t the principle from that Mass. High school with the pregnancy pact?
Society is sinking fast when the consevitives are the most liberal.

Posted by: last_Conservitive | September 3, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

“To Gov. Palin a baby is a blessing”. This is an encouragement to our teenagers to have babies. Do we need blessings by having babies when we are teenagers? For me, I absolutely don’t want those blessings. However, we cannot deny something already happened. We have to accept it and find out the solution. We don’nt encourage our children to follow that bad example by calling it as blessing.

Posted by: Quy Tran | September 3, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

What’s Todd Palin doing up there. The wife is busy I know but there’s still a family to maintain.
How Sarah choose a looser like him. Must run in the family. Because the Palin’s have excepted the situation doesn’t make the situation right. Palin is a figure head, and if she does not speak out against teen pregnancy she doing the country a disservice COUNTRY FIRST. yea right REPUBLICAN FIRST, lobbist second then the rest of you whinners after. But before Africa of coarse.

Posted by: last_Conservitive | September 3, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Bet the GOP is THRILLED to have Tom Delay back…..Tom is such an up right citizen, so moral, and ethical….. He’s the personification of the GOP party.

Posted by: Trish | September 3, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Like someone said on one of these boards: The Palin family crest is the 3 F’s Fishing, Fight’in and the other F word.

Posted by: Trish | September 3, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Sexists and abortionists – the heart of the democratic party!

Posted by: Soetoro NO! | September 3, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Two more scandalous tapes of the Palin girl has surfaced. One to be released during the VP debate and one during the first presidential debate. I do not know the order of release, but one tape is of her and a boy not Levi. The other with another girl, very hot. wait a minute would that be kiddie porn? Wait and see. DOWN WITH THE UNGODLY GOLITHE, LONG LIVE DAVID.

Posted by: POW | September 3, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

a sixteen year old with a baby or an STD is a punishment. Loving and supportive family or not, they are not prepared physically, mentally or emotionally for such a responsibility. They will be at a disadvantage for years socially and academically. Please not the the GOP platform does not provide for ANY social services for these mothers. GOP opposes day care in HS, and supports the expulsion of those that get pregnant while attending. They are against any welfare benefits for such mothers as they are seen to be handouts. If the mother is lucky and supported enough to get a HS diploma or GED the GOP would like to make it a little harder for her to go to college by reducing the available funding and supporting admissions deregulation that would allow schools to discriminate against single mothers. Of course the GOP will be fine if she marries the father, because marriage is such a sacred institution that 16 and 17 year olds that we don’t deem mature enough to smoke, drink or vote are clearly mature enough to make a lifelong commitment to one another. Yep that makes sense.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

POW
Yeah, sure.

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

Jason – you’re absolutely full of it. Such childish assertions and hatefulness. A typical Obama supporter!

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

A teenage pregnancy may be a blessing to some but it isn’t always the ideal scenario for a young person so early in life. There is no one “right” situation, no one size fits all experience.
The punishment Obama referred to was suffering an STD as a teenager.

Posted by: Lee Ann Sontheimer Murphy | September 3, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Bristol is a youn girl who should be practicing abstinence, but did not. Why should we believe she had only one lover? Levi better get a paternity test to protect himself from political coverup. I’ve seen footage of her and another boy, I hope, while drunk. It seems like he was filming without her knowledge. Thank god for teenage boys. This kid just screwed the Rebublican Party not to mention Bristol too!

Posted by: POW | September 3, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

I don’t care what family support you have, a child having a child is punishment if they don’t have a choice. What do these kids know about getting married and raising a child. It’s hard enough when you’re an adult.

Posted by: Samantha | September 3, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

Lee Ann Sontheimer Murphy
Clearly, you’ve received bad information. Anyone who cares to look it up can find Obama’s reference to his daughter’s abortion because of a ‘mistake’ they made.
But then, the democratic party is defined by abortion under the code word ‘right to choose’!

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Samantha
Unplanned pregnancy’s happen in and out of marriage. Unfortunately, the liberal answer is to terminate the life of the fetus. That’s an easy way out and says little of people taking responsibility.
But then, the democratic party is no longer concerned with people taking responsibility. Are they?

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

In all fairness, stay the F—k away from Sarah’s or Obama’s family. Have some balls and attack the politicians herself or himself on their characters or the issues. All these low-life scum bags need to be ashamed of themselves to attack on the 17 year old girl day in day out.

Posted by: mtr2311 | September 3, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Obama the illegitimate child of a bigamist…..should lay low on all family issues regarding Palin. He has the most complicated family of any candidate….Kenyan Muslim dad, Indonesian Muslim step dad, 8 half siblings and 3 step mothers…..please, lets not go there.
McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 3, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Sarah Palin has received more scrutiny from the press in one week than Barack Obama has in one year. Why are tough questions asked of every single candidate except Barack Obama? I agree with Governor Ed Rendell of PA – the coverage of Obama by the American press is an embarrassment. I have started watching Fox News and listening to O’Reilly, Hannity, etc. to learn what’s really going on. When I have to tune into Fox News to get the real story, I know something’s wrong in this country. Is the MSM so determined to put Barack Obama in office that they’ve forgotten the principles of objective journalism? Hillary Clinton was vilified by the media, but I have yet to hear one reporter ask Barack Obama a tough question. Why hasn’t anyone asked him how he feels about reparations for African Americans? If reporters can ask if Sarah Palin is willing to submit to a paternity test or if she can handle both the vice-presidency and four children at home, they can ask if Barack favors reparations or affirmative action. The MSM has not done its job in this campaign. There have been two standards in this election – one for Barack Obama and one for every other candidate. White-guilt liberalism at its finest. The low point in this campaign – last night when Mark Shields on PBS said that Bristol Palin is now the most famous pregnant 17-year old in the country. His argument was that Palin is willing to put her career before the needs of her daughter, and therefore is not a good mother. Not one word about the fact that Barack Obama allows his two mixed-race children to be raised in a church where white people are blamed for all the ills in the world. Utter hypocrisy on the part of the pro-Obama media.

Posted by: JB in St. Louis | September 3, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Coming from Delay that is encouraging.
Because I know he is the least credible person in the solar system

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Aston, if you belong to the GOP you belong to a party that claims pro life but supports torture, war as a first response and the death penalty. What they really stand for is anti freedom of choice, they want to tell you who you can or cannot marry, what faith to belong to, what you are allowed to learn, and what you can do with your body. The GOP support the formation of a police state, where all local law enforcement are required to provide data to the feds or lose funding. The GOP is so busy trying to see how close to the line they can get with the Constitution they don’t realize that they are already nearly across it. Freedom means tolerance for ideas you don’t like. The GOP stands for absolutism.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

although I don’t like here daughter being the crosshairs of the news i must say
HOW DOES IT FEEL GOP WHEN YOU ARE WITNESSING CHARACTER ASSASSINATION OF YOUR CANDIDATE(S)
looks like the sword is doubled edged.

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Jason
You know nothing about me. And to start making a point with the word ‘if’ is the sign of an idiot.

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Why on earth are you quoting DeLay or Hastert, two people who have been driven out of politics because of significant ethical violations?
Is this the best that the Republican convention has to offer?

Posted by: pedestrian | September 3, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Any Republicans out there need to understand that people like DeLay and Hastert are going to drive your party into the ground. You can see what they did in 2006; I can’t believe you’re still letting them speak for you today.

Posted by: pedestrian | September 3, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Ashton you are asking a child to take responsibility for something they know nothing of. I don’t advocate abortion but I am definately pro-choice.

Posted by: Samantha | September 3, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

I’m sick and tired of seeing on blogs what Tom Delay has to say. He’s a crook and liar. He’s been kicked out of congress and is null and void. The Republican Party is run by the “old guard” and this proves it. Karl Rove and Tome Delay is trying to keep everything the same by promoting McCain and Palin as Pro Choice and trying to make Obama out to be a baby killer. I can’t stand the Republican Party. How can people vote for a party that has practiculy brought down America with their economic policies. They are hypocrates and liars. They are racists and they don’t have platform to run on so they put this woman in front of us and say “she is a reformer”. I’m seething and I bet the reason Obama’s poll numbers are rising is because most people feel like I do and this is a pathetic attempt to win votes.

Posted by: Lois, California | September 3, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Samantha
Of course you don’t personally advocate abortion but favor a woman’s right to choose (pro choice = abortion).
Isn’t that what you’re supposed to say?

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Aston its hard for you to believe , But here in Alaska its almost common knowledge. Small town big high school. famous parents, for Alaska. It was cool and fun before the whole world knew. Kinda like the Preacher kids syndrome. Shes not the only one, shes just the only one who’s mom is running for VP

Posted by: POW | September 3, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Please don’t continue to bash on Bristol Palin. It is so mean-spirited. We are supposed to be wise adults leading the young, not acting like adolescents ourselves.
The point is an Obama presidency would be much WORSE than ANYTHING our country has EVER experienced:
1–Obama has ties to ACORN —Hugely scary.
2–Obama supports infanticide–allowing babies who survived abortions to die untended, despite the fact some are full or nearly full-term. Shouldn’t our president want to PROTECT young American life? What a bully he is.
3–This one is a no-brainer–Mr. Obama has VERY LITTLE EXPERIENCE and would leave the U.S.A vulnerable in so many ways–from terrorist attacks, etc. People criticize Sarah Palin (who has GOVERNING, not LEGISLATING) experience-much more relevant to the office she is seeking. With Obama, America would have 100% chance of an unqualified president.
4–Obama isn’t willing to make decisions. How can you vote ‘present’ instead of ‘yes’ or ‘no’ unless don’t want to be known as deciding either way? That’s a cowardly action.
By the way, Lee Ann Sontheimer Murphy:
you wrote: There is no one “right” situation, no one size fits all experience
With all due respect, that’s just not true. The “right” situation always is to pursue the highest good. The death of a child (as abortion is) is never a highest good. What’s more, giving out birth control (half of which are abortifacient anyway) to teens is never a highest good. It promotes selfishness, self-gratification and degrades the sexual act, which, by virtue of its existence is an accepting and loving act. Sex after marriage is of course the ideal. When that ideal is not met, one does not literally throw out the baby with the bathwater. One picks up the pieces and makes the best of a challenging situation. Why on earth people here keep attacking a 17 year old young lady is beyond me. It’s just a mean distraction tactic meant to draw attention away from Sarah Palin and her remarkable qualifications, experience and values.
As for myself, I can’t wait to see Sarah shine tonight!! :)
. McCain/Palin ’08 Country First

Posted by: Theresa T. | September 3, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

POW – is there a point there?

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

JB, are you kidding me? Obama has been evicerated in the press. No other candidate has had their religion, their heritage nor their patriotism and even citizenship questioned as Obama has. False accusations from his birth certificate to alleged involvement in a Kenyan coup have been widely reported. None of which have shown to have any merit.
Palin is a poor choice because she is under educated and despite having been a mayor of a town with fewer people than attendend the last Cardinal football game and Govenor of a state with fewer people than Memphis, Tennesee. She claims to be against earmarks and I am sure she is, she already got the ones she wanted. I could care less about her bother in law or her daughter.
No one has called her a terrorist, no one has said she is not an american, no one has called her a racist. Obama has been running the largest, and most successful world class campaign in American history. Of the two of them, I’d rather have him in the oval than her. I’m at least reasonably sure he could pick out Iraq and Afghanistan on a globe.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Now even staunch supporters of Hillary Clinton (Democrats) are coming out in defense of Laura Palin and motherhood and her right to choose to have a career.
Obama had better control his workers and supporters who are now slamming Palin. He is losing support among Clinton’s women supporters.
If Obama had received as much scrutinising and vetting from the repubs and MSM as Palin, he would not be where he is now. His background is smelly.

Posted by: Mary | September 3, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Lemme get this straight… Tom Delay is lecturing Democrats on morals? Dems that have sex out of wedlock are criminals, but for Republicans, this behavior just makes them more human –more like one of us? Twelve years in state and national politics isn’t enough experience for Obama, but less than two years as governor makes Palin (who’s never even had a passport and said just months ago that she doesn’t even know what a VP does) ready to lead? God help us all.

Posted by: Ryan | September 3, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

Ryan – not as bad as Bill Clinton getting involved in ethics. Is it?

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Aston, you’ve made it clear that you believe that your beliefs should be applied to everyone else. Just like the GOP. You’d like the gov’t to tellus what to do and damn the consequences. and pro choice does not equal abortion, as if that were the only choice.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

“smelly” Mary? What exactly about his background is “smelly”? He’s well educated, active in his community, and supportive of the Constitution, of course the GOP doesn’t want such a person involved with the executive branch.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Ah yes — a paragraph of assertions.
Typical of Obama’s followers. Always quick to jump on the bandwagon of today’s KOS topic and smearing anyone who doesn’t agree.

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

me
That’s easy – just kill the unborn baby and he/she won’t have to suffer. Just like your master suggests.

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Obama lost his new car smell long ago! He and Biden old clunkers…politics as usual. It’s nice not to see the Obama’s trotting their girls out for photo ops and mag covers anymore, however with the spotlight now off him and family, Mr. Ego might start granting those interviews with EXTRA again.
John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin have 12 kids between them!…3 adopted by John McCain….2 special needs kids, one from each family.
They look like alot of American blended families…..and I keep them all in my prayers, while the Axlerod/Obama camp try and smear Gov. Palin.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN!!!

Posted by: Debra | September 3, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Jason,
You wrote to Aston:
“you believe that your beliefs should be applied to everyone else”
Actually, I just have to point out that some beliefs SHOULD be applied to everyone equally–the belief you shouldn’t beat your children, for example. The belief you shouldn’t cheat on your taxes. The belief you shouldn’t steal. These ‘beliefs’ are things that SHOULD BE applied to all people. And the belief that we are a society that should not tolerate the ‘termination’ of our own offspring is a belief that should be upheld.
We live in a country full of laws and regulations that are applicable to all people. Every American has the right to exist. Abortion ALWAYS results in the death of a child (if there’s no child, then there’s nothing to ‘terminate’ is there?)and hurts women too, both physically and emotionally. Why do you think there are organizations like ‘Silent No More’? Why do you think there are support groups for post-abortive women struggling with depression?
Abortion should not be tolerated-by anyone, and if some people are selfish and mean enough not to see it then they shouldn’t be legislating THEIR loose morality on the rest of the country by defending the so-called ‘right’ to ultimately bully an infant–which results in the infant’s death. . How dare you suggest that it is an equal choice for me to HAVE or KILL my child.
You also wrote, “pro choice does not equal abortion” Well, duh, yes it does. It means you are FOR the OPTION of killing a child and you support someone if they invoke their option.

Posted by: Theresa T. | September 3, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Hey all you Obama supporters, would you give the SAME abortion advice to Bammie’s Mammie? Who would you be worshipping had she taken your party’s advice & aborted him? Maybe you would have preferred she change her mind about the teen pregnancy & had one of those partial birth abortions he doesn’t ban; you know, the abortion where they wait til 5 mos or later to induce labor, pull the baby out as much as possible, but leaving the feet in (technically, according to the congressional debate a few years ago, the baby’s not born yet) then sticking a rod up the back of it’s neck, without anesthesia, and suck the brains out.
How bout that y’all. That’s what yer fightin for when you vote Obammie.

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

theresa, the belief that you ans aston want to force everyone to accept is that a fertilized egg has the same rights as a 6 month fetus. I respectfully disagree.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Jason
How silly can a person be. Now, you change the subject entirely. Is that the only way you believe you can win a point?

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

I also find it funny that you don’t want children beaten but the GOP has no issue dentencing them to death as young as 13. No I don’t think you should be able to beat your children or steal anything you want. Nor do I believe that you should be told who you can marry based on your race or sex.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

aston, how did I change the subject, it was abortion, the point made is that abortion is unacceptable at any stage because you and yours seem to believe that a fertilized egg is the same as a child. and you want to make me legally bound to believe the same. If you don’t understand the argument you aren’t qualified to make a decision.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Where’s the call for a paternity test for Obammie? HOW do we know she didn’t fake HER pregnancy and really had him outside the US and brought someone else’s baby to Hawaii????
So, let me get this right. It’s OK for THEE Candidate to be borne out of wedlock (which, 70% of African Americans are anyway) to a TEEN with a dad from another continent. AND, all you have is to crucify a 17 yr old and her pregnancy???
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA!
Plus, you get your conspiracy theories from kids on extreme left radical blogs, that’s your big source for advancing the “she had the daughter’s baby for her…” PUHLEASE
Keep it coming. Keep it coming. It’s gonna smack ya.

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

and Aston, this is the base difference between me and the GOP, I don’t need to win, I don’t need you to think the way I do. That is what freedom is about. That is what the GOP wants to destroy.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Jason
I’m not going to have a duel with an unarmed opponent. Good-bye!

Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Who is going to take care of the infant with Down’s Syndrome, as well as the younger Palin children? Her teamster husband? Hired help? Don’t Republicans believe in parents raising their own children anymore?

Posted by: Rose | September 3, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Who is going to take care of the infant with Down’s Syndrome, as well as the younger Palin children? Her teamster husband? Hired help? Don’t Republicans believe in parents raising their own children anymore?

Posted by: Rose | September 3, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Obama has an interview with OReilly tomorrow nite (9/4) on Fox. That’ll be fun. No teleprompter. Obama as himself. *clapping wildly*
PALIN 2008
PALIN for President 2012
PALIN for Re-Election 2016
!!! Maybe the conservative MOVEMENT should get a rich non-USA resident to start a new site: MOVEOVER.org!

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

ah Aston, the last refuge of those without a point other than the one on thier head. I suppose you are holding your breath now to prove you are right.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Jason,
A ‘fertilized egg’ (at which point a woman wouldn’t even KNOW she is pregnant, btw) is human, no? If not human, then what? Tree? Monkey? (not trying to be insulting to you–just trying to really explain my reasoning) Simple biology dictates that when a sperm and egg unite it creates a HUMAN. Now, you can argue, if you wish, that the ‘soul’ (or whatever you want to call the spirit) of the person may or may not be in that small group of cells, but it cannot be denied that what comes into existence at fertilization is a human, albeit a very YOUNG one :).
If you were driving down the road and thought there might be the possibility (not entirely convinced,mind you, as you are not convinced that abortion at an early stage kills) if you were aware that there MIGHT be a possibility of hitting a child on a bike in a row of parked cars where your vision didn’t reach, but you weren’t sure, wouldn’t you take the precaution and drive SLOWLY, or around, or completely avoid the area where there MIGHT be a child?
I would guess yes, you would. (We all would :) ) so why is this different? If there is a CHANCE (and there’s far more than a chance as far as I can see) that this ‘fertilized egg’ is a young human, then why would we (society) take a chance of destroying that life?
But Jason, the fact is, most abortions DON’T occur with a single fertilized egg. Many many many abortions occur at a time when the baby is not only recognizeable but actually struggles for life after abortion.
I will validate and encourage the choice of many things–import or domestic car is your business (I may have an opinion that you ought to buy domestic, but that choice is not of the significance of the human life one) You can choose whatever kind of lunch you wish. You can decide more important issues too–like whether the government should fund certain programs, or drill in Alaska….those are your opinions and choices. But your (or anyones) choice to ‘swing your fist ends at my face. In other words, your (one’s) ‘Choice’ should not include the ability of whether another should live or die just to make your (again, nothing personal–I should say ‘one’s) life more convenient or easier.
I have carried nine children to term. I have felt them move in my womb. I KNOW there is life early on. I have felt it inside myself. I really hold no rancor towards you-or your political opinions except I get really really upset when people claim to be ‘pro-choice’ because what they are saying is that they support a woman’s decision to kill her child. It’s a decision that hurts women too at a time they need love and support.

Posted by: Theresa T. | September 3, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

I’m confused, aren’t you the party who tells women to get out of the house and work AND be a mom? Why aren’t you asking the same questions about all the women Dem’s.
What about Pelosi and all those women? Where were your questions then?
You exalt Hollywood types who are pregnant plastering them all over your liberal trash magazines, so why is there another set of standards where this women is concerned. Ohhhhhh, I get it. She’s a REPUBLICAN, a CONSERVATIVE republican who believes in (GASP) GOD.
A set of rules for the libs. The entertainment value you provide is priceless.

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

HAHAHAHAHAH! Now, according to libs, REPUBLICANS are supposed to stay home and take care of their kids. Not always. We just do like the rich libs, hire NANNIES.
Please, please stop all your hypocrisy. Can you NOT see what you are doing???

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Liberals understand that, with Obama’s ears and Michelle’s hips, size does matter!

Posted by: Soetoro NO! | September 3, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Another point: The article states that
Obama and Biden are in favor of comprehensive sexual education.
Why should I trust the government to teach my children about sex? Parents have a primary right to discuss this personal topic with their children and not have ANY political party’s agenda be forced on them. Teach abstinence and if the parents want to teach otherwise at home, of course they are free to do that.. But the Obama/Biden act as though the goverment ‘owns’ our children and can decide better than parents what they need to be told about sex.
I don’t want the lesbian/gay agenda forced upon my six year old. It goes against MY family values. If Obama and Biden got into office we’d see more and more of that agenda too.
Do you want Obama telling your kids about sex? EW. I’d much rather have the pro-abstinence message from the Republicans. If you want to tell your children something else at home, then that would be your perogative. But please let me raise mine the way my husband and I see best.

Posted by: Theresa T. | September 3, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Why is it that Scott Petersen was charged with a DOUBLE murder when he killed his pregger wife, but doctor’s are not charged with murder. Anyone?

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

simple biology does not call the coming together of two gamets human. If even two sperm fertilize the same egg it is likely that that egg will die, should we the charge the near father with murder? Once the egg is sucessfully merged with the sperm, it still needs to get to the uterus or there will still be no pregnancy. By your reckoning a tubular pregnancy should not be terminated as it would be akin to murder. I have a serious problem providing that an egg containing two cells should have the same rights as a fully developed fetus. 12 weeks is the line I draw in the sand for myself. after 12 weeks you lose the option to abort a pregnancy. They call the early stages of cell division after fertilization an embrionic state specifically because it is NOT a human, it is something that has the potential of becoming a human and there are many, many steps along the way where any number of naturally occuring factors can prevent that from happening. during that time, I believe that a woman should have the choice as to whther she wants to make the commitment of having a child or not.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Jason, a question for you:
At what point in the pregnancy do you feel the “fetus” becomes “human?

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

obamamama
I never thought of it that way. You make an excellent point. For those who take the time to understand what you’ve said, that is. I don’t expect every here to ponder much of anything however.

Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

scott peterson’s wife was 8 months pregnant. that is a significant difference. any doctor perfoming an abortion at 8 months would be breaking the law.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

And if you libs knew the real story of Tom Delay, you’d freak. Just another of your Scooter Libbey type indictments. Not surprising because they’re republicans and your side can kill (Teddy kennedy), sexually harass (Bill Clinton), kiss up to terrorists and the Black Liberation Army (Obama), but that’s OK.

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

obamama I was clear on that 12 weeks. based on the science I’ve studied, that is the absolute latest that I believe the choice should be permitted.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

OK, so Jason admits that a “fetus” is human. We’re making progress!

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

ok, theresa, you don’t want people that you disagreee with teaching sex ed, but I should accept your view of what should be taught? Abstinence only education does not work. It hasn’t worked…ever. It has been shown to be co9unter productive as the kids have even less knowledge about the consequences of sex.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

you twits, you still think pro-choice is pro abortion. it is about the choice. If I were able to get pregnant, I would not have an abortion, I just don’t need to the govt to tell me that I can’t. I would not counsel anyone to get an abortion, but I would not force my will on them. My opinion is that at 12 weeks enough of the brain stem has been formed that the fetus is a defacto human. You won’t convince me that a joined sperm and egg is the same thing.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

the choice is the key, you want to teach your children that abortion is not an option, go right ahead. No one will stop you. That isn’t enough though, everyone has to believe the same as you and accept your POV as irrefutable fact.

Posted by: Jason | September 3, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Jason, you wrote:
Once the egg is sucessfully merged with the sperm, it still needs to get to the uterus or there will still be no pregnancy.
Actually that’s not true. A pregnancy is simply an egg and sperm uniting–the result is a human embryo (human. yes, human). It doesn’t have to be in the uterus. By your own post you gave the perfect example–a tubular pregnancy is a pregnancy nonetheless.
Actually you bring up a very interesting point. In removing a tubular pregancy your purpose is to save the life of the mother. In doing so the tiny embryo is destroyed. If there were a readily available way to sustain that life then we might be morally obligated to seek that. However, at this point in time there is no way to sustain a removed tubular pregnancy. So the embryo dies not because the doctor and mother are trying to kill it, rather it is because they are trying to save her life and the unfortunate result is the death of the embryo. This is a far cry from disturbing, interrupting, destroying a perfectly healthy embryo, fetus, baby (call the human what you will–they’re just names for the same being in different stages of development)
You wrote: “I believe that a woman should have the choice as to whther she wants to make the commitment of having a child or not”
So do I! But that decision needs to be made before the child is created, not as an afterthought which results in a child’s death. There are no unwanted children. There are thousands of families waiting to adopt. But there are people whose hearts do not hold love. That is the problem. Also, there is fear. Fear is one main cause of abortion. To dispel fear we need to treat women with love and respect the life they carry within them.
Some men say that abortion is a woman’s ‘choice’. Often that just allows them to take advantage of her with the belief she can always ‘exercise her choice’ if need be.
I miscarried in the 10th week. I saw on an ultrasound a tiny embryo with little arms. I watched a beating heart. I was sad for weeks over the loss of my child. ARe you saying my child was not human, that I had nothing to mourn?
A human exists from the moment of conception.

Posted by: Theresa T. | September 3, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Jason, you wrote:
ok, theresa, you don’t want people that you disagreee with teaching sex ed, but I should accept your view of what should be taught?
You don’t need to accept my view at all. :) You are free to teach your children what you wish. Under Obama’s nation children would mandatorily be taught what I oppose. What’s fair in that? With abstinence there is no harm for your child. You can supplement that how you wish. We need to be able to support parents in THEIR decisions as to what to teach their children, not dictate birth control. Did you know that prior to the 1930s that all major religions opposed artificial birth control? Did you realize that with the advent of artificial birth control more marriages ended in divorce, presumably because some responsibility of a pregnancy was lifted? Artificial birth control, while present in society for a very long time, has only reached epidemic proportions in the last 75 or so years. We can see what that has wrought on society–broken families, sickness….
As for your comment, “Abstinence only education does not work.” I’d say, sure it does–when it is practiced. :)

Posted by: Theresa T. | September 3, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

type in fetal development on google and watch the You Tube video. Amazing. Pay attention to 8 -12 weeks.

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

type in fetal development on google and watch the You Tube video. Amazing. Pay attention to 8 -12 weeks.

Posted by: obamamama1 | September 3, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

and when you watch that, think about the baby being sucked out, limbs torn, body demolished (while it can feel everything) and say, with all your HEART, YEAH! WE HAVE A RIGHT TO KILL THAT BABY.
There’s no reason why adoption cannot be an option and why teens can’t be free to have their babies (which many do) and instead of a “choice” to flush them or put them in the trash, bring them to an adoption center, no questions asked, for a family to adopt. Now, what’s wrong with that option?
Abortion is simply legal murder.

Posted by: obamamama1 | September 3, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

At the end of the day, liberals still prefer the easy way (abortion) to the act of taking one’s responsibility. OK to have fun and not pay the piper.
And what’s this about pro-choice not equaling pro-abortion? Now that’s an idiot’s play on words.
And of course, all good libs say they would never abort a fetus but they are, nevertheless, all for another to make that choice.

Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Yes obamama1 (still curious about your name, though :) ) I agree. :) for the ‘pro-choice’ here, why are you so upset about Bristol Palin’s ‘choice’ to give life to her child? By your reasoning, any ‘choice’ is ok, so why not this one?
Bristol is willing to suffer for her child’s life (by putting up with all this criticism–you realize you’re persecuting the young lady) and while she made the mistake of premarital sex (not of not using birth control as you would find the greater ‘sin’) she shows us all that life is valuable even at an unborn age. I think she is showing a lot of young teens who find themselves in her situation (pregnant and unmarried) that they don’t have to be forced to have abortions–that they can choose life and that that is a good, valid ‘choice’.

Posted by: Theresa T. | September 3, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Sarah has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain as Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican Governor, who was definitely part of the “old school” and who WAS very much in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change – and we got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state (and in both parties) – the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.

Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Sarah has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain as Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican Governor, who was definitely part of the “old school” and who WAS very much in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change – and we got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state (and in both parties) – the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.

Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Obama strongly support legislation of infanticide act. What else do you need to know about him?
————-
Fuc$%ing idiots like you are about to make my head explode…do some research and learn what you’re talking about before posting comments that even a mentally retarded person knows is false.

Posted by: nic | September 3, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Tom DeLay???? They haven’t figured out if he’s guilty or not yet? If I stole a Snickers from a 7-11 my life wouldn’t be worth two cents.
Rather than lying low and be thankful he’s not making license plates and answering to some old guy they have to call “Captain” he’s sticking his nose into an already outrageous non-scandal. Thanks, Tom, but no thanks.
I guess he figures Bush will give him a pardon. Maybe he and Roger Clinton, Jr. should form the “Executive Pardons Saved Our Sorry Butts Society”.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | September 3, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

At the end of the day, liberals still prefer the easy way (abortion) to the act of taking one’s responsibility.
———
Callousness like this is why social conservatives are no longer relevant in this country. You’re a judgemental piece of shi$, and I hope you rot in whatever hell you believe in.

Posted by: nic | September 3, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Okay, rather than teaching abstinence or sex ed why not just not teach anything at all that way no one’s views would b forced on anyone else? Just a thought! Also, adoption agencies are already crowed with unwanted babies/children as it is so really while I am NOT saying I would abort a child why not give the woman the right to choose what she wants to do. I mean if I was raped I would totally want to have the option or abortion because in that case it would be unwanted because I would not want to have a reminder of that horrendous experience. Oh yea, and actually a lot of times with adoption the child may not know anything about their past family history for illnesses either(like what has happened REPEATEDLY with my mother)and I would NEVER want any child to go through that you know.
Oh yea, SARAH PALIN DOESN’T BELIEVE IN PROTECTING WILDLIFE INCLUDING THE POLAR BEARS!!!!! I am a STRONG believer in animal rights and protecting them from exstinction, etc. so I had to point that out to you all too!!!

Posted by: New Obama Supporter | September 3, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

The polar bears are not becoming extinct. They’re doing fine. That was an Al Gore lie. The photo he used to advance the lie about polar bears was purchased by his people from a student who took it during her summer break in August. (the bear standing alone on a seemingly melting iceberg).

Posted by: obamamama | September 4, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I am a great grand mother,spirit-filled christian with a cph.d,a pro-lifer and an Obamacan ( switch from rep.)when he said we should lower abortions by addressing some of a woman fears like,health care,understanding baby sick leave,school home work while having a sick baby ,school leave for expecting mother that she wouldn’t have to start all over, jobs with equal pay ,
make easier to adopt, we have more abortion clinics than homes for pregnant woman.we should advocate for mothers to change their minds by having more education for men on how and why to love your baby.I have small school and I give the best care to low income families. I am talking to my friends and sharing ideas about this issue.thank
God.
extra pay when school is out and mothers have to work. it also caused me to remember an article I read that 48% of women who are murdered are pregnant. If the man is famous we hear about this but if he is not there is a woman dead who told her lover or husband she was pregnant. I think we should dig these women up and ask them to tell their stories. I believe we should have more places for women to flee for their lives. I finally see somethings that I didn’t see. I am still pro life but! now I can see more mercy and grace.

Posted by: dr j | September 21, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.