Hillary Campaigns in Florida for Obama, but Will She Take On Palin?
This morning in Kissimmee, Fla., Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., will discuss the economy at a town hall meeting, after which she will visit a convention of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers in Lake Buena Vista. Her day ends in Tampa with a rally.
How strongly will she take on Sen. John McCain’s new running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin?
"She’s going to continue to do what she’s been doing, as recently as yesterday," a Clinton aide told me Sunday, forwarding a Saturday story with the headline, "Clinton Brushes Aside Questions About Palin."
At New York City’s annual Labor Day parade and in Staten Island, Saturday, Clinton was asked about Palin. She demurred.
"This election is about issues, and that’s what’s going to matter to people at the end of the day," Clinton said. The Associated Press reported that Clinton "only mentioned Palin by name once during the day, at the labor breakfast, when she uttered a modified version of a line from her speech at the Democratic National Convention. ‘No way, no how, no McCain, no Palin,’ she said."
There are Obama supporters who feel Clinton needs to make a strong case against Palin. And they are intrigued — and troubled — by the fact that she won’t.
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Hello, she is not bitting for all you reporters who want to see a cat fight and get a chance to call her a bitter jealous B. Not gonna work. She is going to talk about issues not go after palin, barack’s attack dog needs to do that.
Posted by: rachel | September 8, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am
No, and Neither will Charlie Gibson, who I suspect will give a fluff interview held over two days, don’t ask the right questions, don’t get the second day interview.
Posted by: Thinking | September 8, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Yeah, understand why she wont attack Palin but I must give it to the Mccain campaign. They played the gender card making Palin difficult to hit. Biden will chew her but I tell you he will come out as sexist. They have a lot to attack her with but they are just playing the game till the tension ceases up a bit. How long? Hope not too late by then.
Posted by: jayjay | September 8, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
She does NOT need to take on PALIN….Palin is not running for Preisdent, McCain is….She will take on McCain
McCain is a LIAR and Palin is even more of a LIAR but MSM doesn’t bother to report on it, they like negative on BLACK people ONLY
Posted by: McCain = BUSH = LIARS | September 8, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
I wouldn’t work too hard Hillary. It is the Chosen one’s battle to win.
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
Hillary has to much class to be Obama’s attack dog. She knows that she will be running again in ’12 and doesn’t want to anything to hurt herself. Obama needs to remember “we are the ones they wern’t expecting”! Go PUMA’s!!!!!
Posted by: PUMAMcCain | September 8, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Charlie Gibson is tough but since the last ABC debate I cant trust him and since the interview will be conducted in ALASKA, over a PERIOD OF THREE DAYS, I dont expect any tough questions either. Infact, I suspect she already knows all the questions.
Posted by: jayjay | September 8, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Who let the air out of Obama’s tires?
Posted by: Steve | September 8, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Jesus was a community organizer, Pontius Pilate was a Governor.
Jesus was a community organizer, Pontius Pilate was a Governor.
Jesus was a community organizer, Pontius Pilate was a Governor.
Posted by: Scripture | September 8, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
A question Hillary should be asked “Why didn’t obama pick you, much less vet you as VP?”
Posted by: geevill | September 8, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Remember all(Palin)is the one who named herself “The Bit Bull with lipstick”. So if she’s all that no one needs to protect her from the media – cat fight. In my opinion she started when she came out big and bad with all the huff/puff. So I say fair game for everybody. No one else got the Fluff interviews and neither should she. After all she’s been through this right? Mayor and Governor of the city/state? I say bring it on!
Posted by: Joyce | September 8, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Hillary and Bill have got to be laughing their butts off.
Palin in her speech said everything Hillary really wanted to say about Obama but couldn’t.
Hillary knew all along Obama was a phony that is totally unqualified to be president.
She must think it is too funny that once again BO needs her to save him.
Biden better watch his back–he just may get dumped.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 8, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Umm.. I don’t think making this election about Clinton vs. Palin will help the democrats. It needs to be about Obama vs. McCain.
Hillary is smart enough to know that. It astonishes me that no matter how much she gets right on this whole unity thing people have the audacity to keep questioning her as if she doesn’t know what she is doing. There are an awful lot of people in the press who aren’t very bright.
Posted by: Stephanie | September 8, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am
And there are Hillary supporters who feel that she doesn’t need to expose herself to or be responsible for the cleaning up after the mistakes of yet another man, Senator Obama…a man who put his ego above his party and its ability to win the election when he refused to choose her as his running mate.
And since it is Joe Biden who is running against Palin, it is Biden who should take Palin on…not Obama, the presidential candidate, and not Hillary Clinton, no candidate at all.
Two women going at each other would surely amuse the male punditry, but it would hardly serve American women.
The party made its choice. Live with it.
Halli Casser-Jayne
Posted by: Halli Casser-Jayne | September 8, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I am casting my vote AGAINST Barack Obama in November, and I don’t care what Hillary or anyone else in the Democratic Party wants. When the Democrats chose Obama over Hillary, they lost my vote. Obama is exactly what Bill Clinton called him – a Chicago thug.
Posted by: Nina Ruth | September 8, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I dont think Hillary needs to waste anytime on Palin, we all know exactly what Palin is.
Jen
Posted by: Jenny Furlow | September 8, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Gee I thought Obama was the candidate who needed to win.
And “scripture” – you are not comparing Obama to Jesus are you? The JFK references are more than enough, thanks.
Posted by: ECHO21 | September 8, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Hilary is going to dog Palin.She has a reputation that is in risk of being lost by a woman whom Hilary would love to battle and she refuses to give those 18 million.Hilary is playing you all for dumb!.She has already directly dissed Palin and her anger was visibly shown as videotape on CNN just minutes ago show her looking frustrated toward Palins attempts while consistently saying Palin is not for change.Hilary is preparing for war.With an Obama loss much faith will be lost in american politics because worldwide he remains much more popular than Palin by a large degree due to his very receptive politics views.When Palins celebrity dies down and they look into her background more and more the disappointment will occur even more and people are already starting to see the medias attempt to portray her as large and in charge a joke,for she has only energized the republican base.
Posted by: jr | September 8, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Obama wanted an attack dog and he chose Biden for that. This election is between Obama and McCain, it’s Obama that needs to come out and make the best case for himself, he can’t expect Sen Clinton to do that for him. Her supporters already like her, it’s him they are uneasy with and sending her places only makes them think she is being forced. He needs to make campaign stops with BOTH Clintons, on stage to let people feel that things are better between them and they truly support him. Many of people are still upset over the way Bill Clinton was treated also. Al Gore and John Kerry did not use Bill Clinton and they both lost. Like him or not there is no one like Bill Clinton and besides how many two term democrated presidents are out there, Obama’s making a big mistake, do not send the Clintons out there make a few stops with them, get the chip off your shoulder this race is too close.
Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | September 8, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Palin, Guliani, Huckabee, Thompson ripped Obama to shreds.
They made Obama’s so called “attack dogs” look like fluffy little kittens.
I’m sure it made Hillary’s night.
She should tell BO to fend for himself.
Posted by: sally | September 8, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
I don’t care what Hillary has to say about Palin – good or bad. I’m a longtime Democrat, voting since 1972. I’m voting against Obama because I don’t want to spend the next eight years listening to Michelle Obama whine about my country.
Posted by: Maudie | September 8, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
As long as Clinton doesn’t go after Palin directly, her voters will feel more inclined to vote for Palin. Knowing this, she needs to go after Palin to avoid being blamed for an Obama loss, if it happens.
Posted by: Blake | September 8, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Hillary is awesome! If Hillary was the nominee I would be voting for a Democrat this year.
McCain thank you for Pailn!
Dem for Palin/McCain – Change we will vote for
Posted by: Paul | September 8, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Palin is not running for president; just for poster child of radical right. Hillary is right to go after the issues.
Posted by: cynthia | September 8, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
I am sick already about all of you saying they cannot attack Palin. She is fair game!!! Why should she be treated differently? She wants equal rights so have them.
Playing the gener card may backfire in the end especially with this novice. That is why she hasn’t done any interviews. Have you noticed she is always with McCain….RIGHT…she cannot speak without a telepromter.
Posted by: scaredtodeath | September 8, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
Republicans love their country… they just hate half the people in it.
Posted by: the truth is | September 8, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
McCain will win if Sen Clinton is forced to attack. Most of Sen Clinton’s supporters remember how bad she was treated and attacking Palin would be like opening up a wound that hasn’t healed.
Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | September 8, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
So Im wondering What My Girl Sarah has been up to., McCain needs to let the Media Get access to his VP candidate. Thats lame to hide your VP candidate away from the Media. The Only Place you can find Info about Palin is on the Web, Here is some sites Ive been able to find.
This site has everything about her scandals, Levi the Boy Friend, what really happen with ebay plane. http://www.hotpres.com
This site has the inside scoop about the Palin Dui Secret, http://www.duihelpguide.com Why hasnt the news covered this?
This site has background info on sarah Palin Bio, Pics, Videos, Alot of Polls like how many people actually think that she is attractive? http://www.theveep.com
Despite all of this, and her lack of experiance she would probably make a much better president then McCain., Because like Obama she hasnt been corrupted by washington yet. We should probably reverse the ticket Palin/McCain.
Posted by: Peter | September 8, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
I saw Paul Begala quote Nixon saying that “you don’t shot down” which means the target should be McCain not Palin, Palin is like a red herring, they want people to go after her, while everyone is ataacking Palin it will bring up her positive rating and bring down Obamas.
Posted by: Kardasia_Prime | September 8, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Hillary is not dumb enough to be the attack dog. She’s in a good place right now and she isn’t going to blow her future chances at being President.
Posted by: J | September 8, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Why is no one pointing out the ever so obvios about Sara Palin? When Sara Palin introduced herself to the massess at the Republican Convention, she asked to us think of her as a “Pitbull.” Last time I checked, the dog pound is full of Pitbulls because noboday wants them. They are dangerous. Many communities have outlawed the ownership of Pitbulls.
Her other nick name is “Barracuda.” Enough said?
Posted by: Miguel | September 8, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
McCain keeps trying to convince us that he is not like Bush. Then he picks a VP who is more like Bush than anyone! Sick of the whole bunch
Posted by: Doc DB | September 8, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
It’s amazing to me to see so many people buy into this transparent GOP campaign. Once again, they have avoided ever discussing issues and have resorted to the Rovian style name-calling. Just like the past eight years, if you repeat the lie enough times, people will see it as truth. It makes me sad for America.
The supposed ex-Hillary voters who claim they are voting for this man are voting McCain for all the wrong reasons.
Should McCain/Palin win this election, the next four years will be dreadful. We will get the President we deserve. Let’s just hope we survive.
Posted by: justwow | September 8, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
hillary clinton can’t possibly respect someone like palin. probably finds her nomination as insulting to women as the rest of us do. but she probably also knows that palin’s success is a threat to her. maybe she figures palin will eventually hang herself.
Posted by: k2000 | September 8, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
I feel shocked when I hear democrats say they will vote for McCain/Palin. Look at the issues, folks! They oppose reproductive freedom, an issue Hillary Clinton stands strong on. If McCain dies in office we are looking at a president who represents very extreme views contrary to individual freedom.
Posted by: Linda | September 8, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Also sick and tired of the whiners who claim Hillary was “treated badly.” What the hell? SHE LOST! If it was a man running would the whiners claim he was “treated badly?”
Posted by: Doc DB | September 8, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Why should Hillary take the low road like Palin did, and for that matter, why should Obama? I know it’s frustrating to see Pilan take over the media coverage, but Hillary is not debating Palin and the media would jump all over it like a pack of mad dogs. It is best for McCain/Palin to fizzle out on their own – I am already getting tired of it and I am sure others will too. When the facts come out about Palin and if she is honest in the debates, then she will be exposed for who she really is…..those who will vote for McCain are going to do so regardless and people are tired of bickering and attacks so why do it?
And I agree, if by chance McCain does win, then Hillary will run in 2012 if we survive another four years of GOP politics – GAG me with a spoon!
Posted by: Sandra S | September 8, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Obama has nothing new to offer. He’d better come up with something in a hurry because it will only get worse for him if he doesn’t.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Hillary wants Obama to lose so she can run again in 4 years. When will everyone learn that for the Clintons it’s only about them.
Posted by: Mark | September 8, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
I don’t care what Hillary has to say about Palin – good or bad. I’m a longtime Democrat, voting since 1972. I’m voting against Obama because I don’t want to spend the next eight years listening to Michelle Obama whine about my country.
————————-
Maudie, if you are a longtime Democrat, then you must share the philosophy of the Democratic Party. To vote for someone whose philosophy is diametrically opposed to yours is utterly ignorant.
Posted by: lhummer | September 8, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Posted by: lhummer | Sep 8, 2008 9:16:03 AM
You are right. McCain is everything that the democrats are against. Who in their right mind would vote against what they believe in.
Posted by: J | September 8, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Hillary, don’t bother…
Because Obama branded you and your husband racists, you will never win a national election. That is a fact. You will never win the black vote again. done. fin.
Posted by: roddy | September 8, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Why does Obama believe he’s running against Bush? Can’t he speak to the issues that Americans want to hear?
Posted by: dl | Sep 8, 2008 9:21:09 AM
Because you can’t tell Bush and McCain apart! McCain hasn’t brought any issues up. He’s to busy playing show and tell with his new running mate, Barbie.
Posted by: J | September 8, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
McCain = death to the middle-class
Posted by: Hilary Smith | September 8, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Hillary may disagree with Palin’s policies but I would bet the bank she admires this woman.
How could she not? Hillary has had to stand up to the good-old-boys and the Washington cronies like Obama, Biden, Reid, Dean,Kennedy etc. and prove herself constantly. Hillary started out as a Republican by the way.
I don’t see how any objective woman cannot respect Palin’s toughness and her determination to fight the corruption in Alaska.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 8, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Most people have already decided who they will vote for in November.
So, why all this discord about the Republicans or Democrats?
Just vote!
Posted by: DeefromTexas | September 8, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
“Hillary wants Obama to lose so she can run again in 4 years. When will everyone learn that for the Clintons it’s only about them.”
Obama asked Hillary to campaign for him, and unless you forgot her outstanding speech at the DNC, she graciously and with dignity asked all Dems to support Obama, by asking her supporters if they did this for her or for the people she is trying to help. Hillary is a great lady and will continue to be a powerful one for many years. If Obama does not win this election, then Hillary most likely will run in 2012, and she WILL win.
Posted by: Sandra S | September 8, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Stop Whining you all losers that need Hillary to help Barrak Husein Obama, She lost He won, why in the hell Obama needs her for.. Grow up homies.
Posted by: Chris | September 8, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Why are people so afraid of a Female running our country.
You would think after over 200 years at least one female would have been Pres or VP.
Posted by: Gene | September 8, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Clarice Feldman:
Sunday Biden says life begins at conception. Over the weekend Obama said he’ll not rescind the Bush tax cuts if the economy remained in trouble. Earlier on O’Reilly he said the surge did work.
Backtracking on the surge, taxes and abortion. Hmm. Next thing you know Obama and Biden will start campaigning in red open-toed shoes and frameless glasses.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Hillary should keep above the fray, let everyone see BO clinging to her skirts, let him lose, take the nomination in 2012.
If he wins, she won”t be able to run till 2016, because the sitting president will be the nominee in 2012. And by that time, who knows what strong candidate will have emerged to challenge her.
Posted by: margaret | September 8, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Palin and McCain have loud mouth, do nothing Biden and the great communicator,oops, I mean the great community organizer Obama in a panic.This pair beats a full house.Biden”s foreign policy in regards to Iraq, split it up like a piece of fruit. What an idiot. Obama the community organizer, never explains what that is. I know exactly what it is. Sharpton and Jackson have been doing community organizing for years.They go into a community that has problems and they organize riots and infernos.Biden and Obama don’t even have the guts to challenge Palin, they need to send women”Hillary” to do it for them. How will those two liars and phonies deal with Iran, Venezuela, Syria, Russia. I guess those gutless wonders would send their women again.Their linking of McCain to Bush is getting old, and people are not buying it.That is all they have.Biden and Obama are the biggest frauds in the country. McCain and Palin win BIG!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: frank viola | September 8, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Did everybody read the details of the agreement for the interview between ABC and Palin?
Her family is off limits (Really? Todd’s membership of the secessionist AIP is off limits? I don’t think so Lady)
The interview will be held over two days in several sessions (who does she think she is? Michael Jackson?)
That last requirement has several consequences:
First, when Gibson does not ‘behave’ like the McCains wants, they can cancel the rest of the sessions? Resulting in Gibson asking only softball questions?
Second, when she flubs an answer, there will be a retake in a follow-up session?
And Gibson is only allowed to use the retake?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
If McCain wins our free fall will pick up speed and the end of the U.S.A will come to an end faster. Everyone that votes for this scary Republican ticket is voting for America’s death.
Posted by: john | September 8, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
I am voting for issues in this election, not character. I am voting for President not vice-president. The right person to lead this country is Barack.
Posted by: Tom | September 8, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
VP is selected to attack the opposing Predidential candidate. It is Biden’s job to attack McCain and Palin’s job to attack Obama. Obama can say that Palin is lacking in experience compared to McCain but that turns on him since she has more experience than Obama. McCain made a perfect pick for VP while Obama made a poor choice since Hillary was more qualified than him. Biden comes off as a nice guy but if Hillary was not going to be chosen because she voted for the war and was part of the establishment then avoiding Hillary to choose Biden was foolish and will now cost Obama the election for sure. Today McCain leads in the polls and it is not October yet……wait for the October surprise. As I have said all the way through the primary, if the DNC nominated Obama, the result will be a loss in a year when democrats had to be trying to lose in order to lose. My prediction is that McCain will carry at least 45 states….if not more. Obama is a fool.
McCain/Palin 2008 and HILLARY 2012
Posted by: soupyet | September 8, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
The Clinton’s don’t stand for much when they can back Obama after the hateful look on Michelle’s face during Hillary’s speech and the DNC had to pull her aside and teach her respect, to act like a grown-up and act like she loves her country. Even when Michelle said she would have to think long and hard to support Hillary and when Obama stole votes from Hillary. What losers.
Posted by: societystinks | September 8, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
I agree with Deefrom Texas. For Dems, if you would like to see Obama win, then get out and vote. Democrats have the numbers – ‘the only thing they have to fear is fear itself’ and the only way they will not win is if they do not vote. For GOP: same – shut the mouth and pull your lever. November 4th will be the deciding factor, not what is said on these boards. Although, it is a good release for frustrations and sharing thoughts, most of the boards come down to tearing everyone and everything apart. But that is America – almost 300 million people and 300 million opinions – and that is freedom of speech.
Posted by: Sandra S | September 8, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Don’t you just love the way the late night comics don’t hesitate to trash Hillary and Palin but rarely ever make jokes about Obama.
They are willing to be seen as sexist but terrified to be called racist.
Demeaning women that’s OK.
It’s time for woman to fight back.
I would dare say sexism got Chrissie Matthews and Keith Olbermann fired from the election desk at MSNBC.
I’ve sent dozens of emails–you can too.
Posted by: sally | September 8, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
As a Clinton voter my comment to Obama
supporters is Obama picked Biden. “GET OVER IT”.
Posted by: geevill | September 8, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Obama is now reaping all the crap that he has sown. He had a chance to follow through on an originality theme but gave that up to accommodate big corporate bucks and DC business as usual.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Obama does not have a bipartisian record. He does not cross the aisles. Obama has voted with the dems 97% of the time in his last 3 years in the Senate.
This isn’t change we can believe in.
Posted by: Ann | September 8, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
I am voting Obama, but he really messed it up for himself. one of the reasons he was so exciting is because he was winning against Hillary – not that he was winning. Aside from Obama’s acceptance speech at the convention, Hillary’s speech got the most draw. Biden is dull, and is going to look like old school politics. That whole “blue collar” appeal – is lost when in politics for last 40 years. Laugh when hear him talk about being one of “poorest members of senate.” Hope us democrats win. Praying that polls don’t take into account young people with cell phones. Can’t believe that we are in this position again. Nancy and Howard must be very proud – got rid of Clintons (for now) – but put us on the brink of losing another election.
Posted by: Lisa S | September 8, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
@sally:
Sexism? You mean like the good ol’ boy Republicans here in NC that want to vote Palin just because she is “boneable”? Palin’s buttons at the convention said she is “The HOT VP from the coolest state”. Nah, that’s not sexist, that’s sexy!
You’re being used. Have fun with that.
Posted by: justwow | September 8, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
I hope that Hillary will crush Palin.
Palin is against everything women are still fighting these days. In my book about women rights and gender equality in the USA, Sarah Palin is an emblem of treason.
Her past as a MISS WASILLA tells everything. Sarah wants to please the men of this world.
Sarah Palin is not a fighter for women, she’s a cheerleader for men. That’s my the majority of Republicans is drooling after seeing and hearing her.
Hillary SHOULD frontally attack her ideologies in Florida.
Hillary, you go girl!
And I’m waiting for Camille Paglia’s vivisection of the Sarah Doll.
Posted by: Miranda | September 8, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
You know what she attack Obama more then any other person and I am sick of hearing he did her wrong he never got negative until she started slinging the crap and now McCain is using it against Obame so tell me who did in who????She won’t attack her she don’t have the guts to take on another woman.She is half Obama and you can tell with her speeches.She is hoping he gets beat and she will run in 12….
Posted by: indp voter | September 8, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
You know, as a woman I find it scary to hear other women say, “I’m voting for McCain because he’s putting a woman in the White House.” They think this despite Palin’s views that seem like a step-back for women (i.e., anti-choice).
I think in order to give women a clear sign that this race *shouldn’t* be about gender and *should* be about issues, Hillary unfortunately needs to step up and say it. People will respect it more coming from a woman. (Obama, McCain and Biden can’t say it.)
Posted by: Tami | September 8, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Obama votes 98% of the time with Pelosi, Reid, Dean.
And that is supposed to comfort us?
With their 9% approval rating?
So those rich people that worked hard all their lives will now have to take care of those that didn’t.
And Obama will give free health insurance to 47 million even illegals?
Give $1,000 carrot to everyone even those that don’t pay taxes.
Wake up America!
Posted by: harry | September 8, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
If Obama needed Clinton’s campaigning, then why the hell did he not pick her as a VP.
You sexist Obama, I will never vote for you and the main reason is what you did to Hiliary. You did not make a wise judgement to choose the right VP, I wonder how you will make decisions as the President of the most powerful nation.
Obama is a power hungry man and as a strong Hiliary supporter I will never vote you.
Go Go Sarah.
-JANE
Posted by: Jeya | September 8, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Please keep in mind that Hillary and other supporters have been asked NOT to attack Palin at this point in time. That’s because Obama does not want to see a poll reversal that can be attributed to Hillary. Too bad, it is the only way he could win. Biden is the consummate insider so he is not in a position to attack her. So far, Biden and Obama have been walking around complimenting her. How stupid of a campaign tactic is that?
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 8, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Hillary won’t say anything to hurt her chances in 2012. She won’t attack Palin because she knows there’s not a whole lot to attack her about and doesn’t want that blemish on her record. I may be wrong, but with the steam Palin picked up for the Repubs, I can envision a Hillary vs. Palin coming up in 2012. Wouldn’t that be an entertaining cat fight.
Posted by: Chris | September 8, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
Females do what needs to be done while males are sitting around thinking about it.
The Clinton’s need to regain respect and speak what they really think of Obama like Bill once did “Chicago thug”. Now they are both two faced and it’s not going to work in 2012 they lost it.
Posted by: societystinks | September 8, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
@jeya:
The question should be, “Why WOULD Obama choose Hillary after the type of campaign she ran against him?” If I were Obama and had chosen Hillary, I would have hired a “taster”, wear kevlar 24/7 and would never catch a wink of sleep.
Had she run a cleaner campaign against him, she probably would have gotten the nod. If he had picked her, there are way too many sound bites the GOP would use against the ticket.
Grow up.
Posted by: justwow | September 8, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
I’m an undecided female Florida voter, a registered Democrat. The DNC abandoned Florida democrats and treated Hillary Clinton like dirt — as did the media. Why should she lift a finger to help Obama in any way? If Obama is so darn wonderful, why would he need her help? I can’t say that McCain’s VP selection influences my vote much, if at all. I think Palin is a politician, just like all of them. I do think that Obama’s camp is shaken about how to deal with her popularity — and Palin is popular here in Florida. I’ve heard and seen that, even among hard-line feminists like my Mom and her friends (women whom came up in the 60s and early 70s –women whom actually fought for women’s rights and the right to choose). They’re angered at the sexism directed towards Palin, especially about her kids and her “amazing” ability to hold a job in spite of being a mother. (Has anybody noticed that Obama has young children and he’s vying for #1 spot not #2? Why are her children more important than Obama’s children? It’s ridiculous.) Obama’s camp should avoid discussing Palin at all — just discuss the isses, period. Also note this: those of us who’re pro-choice at not threatened by McCain or Palin’s pro-life stance. We don’t feel that reproductive rights are the biggist issue right now. We’re concerned about access to healthcare for the poor, elderly, and middle-income families; the struggling economy; U.S. energy independence alternatives; dealing with the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan effectively. There’s no easy way out now; we need somebody who has a clue and Obama doesn’t at this point. He’s so vague! I read his positions over and over again and his nice words show no direction, no plan, nothing really – the Emperor’s New Clothes. He’s as naked as a jay bird if you ask me. Obama needs to come up with concrete direction now and forget the smoke & mirrors, the fancy Greek columns, yuck. He has my complete attention so now show me if there’s a man behind the curtain. Hillary can’t help him; Obama needs to help himself now. That is, if wants my vote.
Posted by: Jessica | September 8, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Hillary has far more in common with Palin than with B.O.
After McCain’s two terms let’s see
Palin/Hillary
“Just say no to B.O.”
Luke
Posted by: Luke | September 8, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
One thing the Republicans can attest to is immorality. Every last one, has their own testimony. McCain, Giuliani infidelity and now Palin. As a Governor, what was she teaching her daughter! Obliviously, sex education was not on list. If she can’t manage her household, how in the Hell will she be able to assist in running the Country. Are we so eager to lower our standards in order to avoid putting a Africian American, in the White House? This just shows that the Republicans are only interested in what is “right” when it refers to someone else.
Posted by: karen | September 8, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
It’s time to vet the Obama/ACORN connection.
He wants to play up his community organizing days? So let’s hear about it from the MSM.
ACORN in many states are being investigated for voter fraud.
Posted by: riley | September 8, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Palin is a HUGE QUESTION MARK.
Regardless of how much Hannity and the Foxes scream “sexist”
we will vet her.
The seem to have fell in love without even knowing her. The fact that she can serve up some red meat is all they need i guess.
Posted by: Omentum | September 8, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
As far as Hillary goes, she has FAR more in common with Palin than with B.O.
After McCain’s second term we will see Palin/Hillary ticket.
You decide:
“Hepcat” or “President”
“Just say no to B.O.”
Posted by: Luke | September 8, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Nothing gives me more joy than to see MSNBC Obberman(whatever) and disgusting Chris Matthews taken off the political TV commentator spots. Yea! for People Power.
Now let’s take down that human waste take too much space on Earth Ophra.
Hillary don’t do Obama’s dirty work for him. Don’t stoop down to that racist, sexist unAmerican trash. We look up to you and you are what we need running the Senate, not that know-nothing barbie Palosi.
Vote McCain/Palin/Hillary. Honor and Country. Viva PUMA
Posted by: Mrs.Phoenix | September 8, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Hillary is yesterday’s news. Except in the opinion of a very few undecided voters, she’s been rendered completely irrelevant by the new Socialist Party of America.
Her values and principles are much more aligned with McCain than they are the radical Obama. Expect a speech that’s just good enough. Be more worried about Bill who would trade his sole for a cabinet position or ambassadorship.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Clinton is right to stay on the issues. It is for others to say how extremist Palin is.
Posted by: Joan from Virginia | September 8, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
To Dee.:
If you think she represents the WHOLE female population of this great country, then you’re sadly mistaken. Not every woman in America wants to be a gun-wielding hockey mom, who preaches abstinence, as thier OWN DAUGHTER is knocked up before getting her high school diploma.
So wake up, and smell the java .. she’s rolling us women back by about 30 years.
She’s not getting my vote, I’ve fought too hard to let a woman like that represent my gender.
Posted by: AJ | September 8, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
For all of you who are still ###### off about who Obama selected as a VP…please know that he didn’t select anyone….the same as McCain. Much thought goes into selecting a VP from many different people, who look at many different issues…not just one. This is politics people…not your elementary school playground. If you want to pout and fold your arms in anger…take it somewhere else. No one cares about you being mad. Vote for the best person but not as “payback” because you are upset about a process you obviously know litle about little about. Secondly, are you 100% sure that Hillary wanted the job?
Posted by: Over the Stupidity | September 8, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
I agree McCain is by far the best man for the job, he also has run a far cleaner race choosing not to be involved in most of the ignorant actions of the other 2. I understand that it is time consuming to look up each persons history but how can any american make a intelligent vote with only the persons word, if you come to my store and I tell you how honest I am only to sell you something that did not hold up and then refused to refund your money, would you ever do business with me again? Likewise the same with politicians, which is why I made the Hitler statement, talk is cheap it means nothing it is your track record that counts, Obama has told so many lies he forgets what he says, this guy tried to play the race card and it backfired in his face. He is pathetic a poor excuse for an American citizen let alone someone who WANTS TO RUN THIS COUNTRY.
He has convinced himself that is something special because he was raised by a white woman many black children are raised by white families, had he or his stupid staff bothered to do some homework they would have found that more white people adopt black children from tired world countries than any other group.
But I do not see him as some savior for the masses in any way that office is not about color or women ’s rights it is about making this country a force in the world like it used to be.
The dollar is at the bottom in so many countries, people are so stupid they don’t realize that if you do not FIGHT FOR FREEDOM it will be TAKEN AWAY, there will ALWAYS be some power crazed maniac somewhere who thinks they have the right to control you.
Any person who comes to this country and was born in this country and reaps the reward for doing so better be ready to fight for the freedom that OUR FOREFATHERS Fought and died for, and moron who does not believe had better get a clue before it is too late, I hate war everyone hates war BUT it is a terrible fact of life and has always been so since the beginning of man.
i just saw their TV ads in pollclash and its getting warmer this time.
Posted by: Jacque Denise Yap | September 8, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Hillary Smith:
In this world America is loosing its influence, because the US ties up its resources in a stupid war and because it does not give others any respect. The US cannot increase its influence by engaging other countries in war but rather by focusing on its own future: economy, education and health care.
Also diplomacy is less expensive, but of course a war can fill up wealthy republican pockets faster. So what honest middle class republicans are really fighting for is the interest of the wealthy ones, and I am not even surprised because that is what poor education leads to: voting against your own interest.
Posted by: Gabe | September 8, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
margaret: “And by that time, who knows what strong candidate will have emerged to challenge her.”
And we can’t have strong candidates challenging her? It’s Hillary First for you?
Sjeeeeez.
Lady, if BO loses in November, do you really believe HIS supporters will forgive HER supporters and support her in the 2012 primaries? Keep on dreaming but revenge tastes sweet.
The only career move for Hillary I see in the future is SCOTUS. She will need BO and a strong Dem Congress for that.
FYI: I was a Hillary supporter in the primaries because she had a better Healthcare plan, not because she was ‘Hillary’. She lost because she had hired incompetent managers, starting with Mark Penn.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Palin gave one speech that was mostly written by a Bush speechwriter, before she was even picked. America can’t afford this empty BS any more. We desperately need leaders who can hit the ground and clean up the mess and get America rolling again. There are real issues and very serious problems that need to be fixed. Issues, Issues, Issues.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 8, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I don’t likes all of Palin’s policies but I absolutely trust her and McCain to change Washington.
The DNC’s treatment of Hillary, the pro-Obama liberal media, the vile hateful Obama supporters–I would never vote for Democrats this year.
Obama lost me with his extreme arrogance and with his lame excuses about Rev Wright/Ayers.
The more I learn about Obama the more I dislike. I wouldn’t vote for him if he was running for the PTA.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 8, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Hang on Hillary–if you really want to be VP.
If Obama keeps tanking in the polls Biden will suddenly have a medical reason to withdraw.
Don’t do it Hillary–he didn’t have the backbone to chose you. Let him fend for himself.
Posted by: riley | September 8, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
@Jacque Denise Yap
McCain running a clean campaign?!?! BWAHAHAHA! What campaign are you watching? This guy is pure Rove politics.
Posted by: justwow | September 8, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Everything exactly as predicted: Obama’s supporters are beating him.
All McCain has to do is keep telling the voters that he hears them, understands what they need and is willing to fight in Washington to get it done. The Obama supporters will continue to wallow in the Great Get Evens of race, gender and age, and in so doing, the Obama campaign comes off as thugs.
What Palin introduced was not hot body politics. Obama did that. She introduced the image of courage, of a woman strong enough to fight and smart enough to win.
People like Palin. That’s hard to overcome. Obama’s supporters have been scaring people. That’s hard to forget.
This has always been the critical weakness of Axelrod/Plouffe’s strategy: it is based on emotional vectoring, using symbolism to push the electorate toward their candidate while pulling them away from the other candidate. They forget or do not know how rock star media is made and destroyed in a single turn of the wheel. Sic transit gloria, or in English, fame is fleeting.
Meanwhile, the engine of exchange between the US and China, the mortage bond industry, is melting before our eyes while our pundit celebrities are enraged on TV because their choice is not respected.
When the journalist becomes the star, something bad has happened, but it is self-correcting because they are subject to the same cycle of new-different-young and don’t be wrong at the right time or right at the wrong time.
This election has outed the hoax of the celebrity politician as natural leader.
Posted by: len | September 8, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
What ever attacks Hillary will have on McCain, it will not work. McCain will contradict Hillary on the truths she already said about boy wonder Obama. Besides, Hillary is good friends with McCain and they enjoy having shots of good liquor together.
Biden is also weak because he’s been McCain’s friend for years, and it was through McCain that Biden met his wife Jill. The Bidens and the McCains have vacationed together for over 33 years.
Obama needs his spirital leader Rev God Dm America Wright to come out and fight for him. I guess Obama has no friends to speak of his good character.
Posted by: Mrs.Phoenix | September 8, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Obama and Biden have to understand that republicans have played the same dirty tactics against Gore and Kerry and they have won, there is nothing better than going dirty too, that is the way it should be. After exploiting fear and war in Georgia and Irak, RNC, McCain and Palin are exploiting the misfortunes of Palin’s family: a son with Dawn syndrome and a teenage daughter, that is how low they can go. God save America from McPalin. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA/BIDEN08.
Posted by: BKMC | September 8, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Jacque Denise Yap:
McCain is running a clean campaign? Is that why he has selected the people who ran Bush’s campaign against McCain in 2000? You know, the same people who smeared his Vietnam-record and told his adopted daughter was really his own lovechild?
And is that why he has chosen Tonya Harding as his running mate?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Look….McCain chose her;
you didn’t, so you can argue all you want about her kids, her sex, her whole private life (which is none of your business or mine anyway)…..
but how come you didn’t argue the same thing when Hillary was running for the #1 spot eh????
yeah…..you people out there just want something to bich about……
Hillary is done for now, so she can either go home and wait for the grandkiddies to come, or stay on the “hot seat” in the Senate, and COOL OFF!
Posted by: Piza Pie | September 8, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Hillary needs to stay home before she ruins any political future she has. If she keeps going out campaigning for Obama, she will be to closely tied to him in the future.
Posted by: samhiguchi | September 8, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Posted by: Mrs.Phoenix | Sep 8, 2008 10:04:42 AM
You are right! bho does not have any long time friends to vouch for his character. those he has associated with for any length of time include: ayers and dorhn, wright, rezko, etc.
Few question mccains character. actually, clinton, biden, kerry(he asked him to be his vp in 2004), daschle, kennedy,etc, have all spoken positively about mccain…
Posted by: pp | September 8, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
One debate and Hillary will wipe the floor with her. Just one guys. PAy per view maybe?
Posted by: community organizer | September 8, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
John McCain and Sarah Palin will be a GREAT!!! The Dems are so desperate their hate campaign has escalated into an unbelievable terror attack on anyone who would not agree with them. It is most frightening! They are so hateful they even turn on their own party members who disagree, ask questions or think for themselves. The Dems idea of Freedom is you must accept anything and anyone they deem no matter what their elected choice says, does or whoever they associate with. You must embrace them even of it isn’t good for you, if you don’t, they will threaten, chastise and terrorize you. You must blindly believe, there is no room for individual thinking. The Party is what you live for and must sacrifice everything you have for the Party.
Their idea of reaching out has turned into a foot on your neck to succumb you lest you not follow our ways. We do not do what’s good for the country, but what we want. They do not compromise because gloating over others is what they live for. If this current party of Democrats prevail, you can throw away the National Anthem, The American Flag, the Constitution and the Presidential Seal, because they will all be replaced by the Obamanation with the Obama logo
Posted by: dragonfly777 | September 8, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
PP – yeah but Palins longtime friends are not supoporting her totally either according to Good Morning America’s story this morning.
Posted by: community organizer | September 8, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
“Lady, if BO loses in November, do you really believe HIS supporters will forgive HER supporters and support her in the 2012 primaries?”
If BO loses, his supporters won’t matter in 2012 because there won’t be any. Go out and see how many W stickers there are left. Once a brand goes bad, it goes straight to the charity dumpster.
You learned absolutely nothing from the Clinton’s and that is why you are down in the polls and possibly heading for a landslide defeat.
Posted by: len | September 8, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
According to UsaToday poll of likely voters McCain destroying Obama by 10 points now, Gallup McCain up , Zogby: McCain Up over Obama Maybe the Hillary factor is helping McCain and Palin, hey thanks Hillary
Posted by: Country First | September 8, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Hillary, don’t bother…
Because Obama branded you and your husband racists, you will never win a national election. That is a fact. You will never win the black vote again. done. fin.
Posted by: roddy
====================
Hillary will win in 2012 because the 12% blacks will have a choice between Hillary and Sarah Palin….McCain will only serve one term. And it is possible that the Republicans will not nominate Palin for President, we shall see………In either case all democrats will have learned the lesson of what happens when you falsly label a civil rights worker as a racist as well as what happens when you use sexist ploys to beat the more qualified woman…..you get a Republican. If that is what they want then good for them and go vote Republican because the reality is that we do not need any more fools of any color in the democratic party. This election of McCain will bring back equal rights and women’s rights to the democratic party very quickly….simply because it was the race baiting and sexist ploys that allowed Obama to be nominated by the slimist of margins…..the convention was set up with help from Hillary to allow her elected delegates to vote Obama……she did not have to do that. Blacks should know that Obama used fruad to get nominated by falsly labeling the Clinton’s racist and if anything the blacks are not dumb enough to believe Obama trash, they just wanted a black nominated…..but he will lose. We should also see the end of Pelosi, Dean and Reid along with all Senators and Governors that endorsed Obama when their states voted for Hillary like in MA. September 16 is primary day for MA and I encourage all MA voters to vote NO to John Kerry and yes to Ed O’Rieley. In fact there are going to be some serious loss’ by elected blacks because of Obama like in MA where no matter what the Gov. Duval Patrick does, he will lose next election for endorsing Obama over the voters pick of Hillary.
Hillary agreed to campaign for Obama and that means her job is to talk about the issues Obama wants to promote, if we can get past his “hope” and “Change” what slogans. It is not her job and I am sure she will not slander another woman with Obama tactics. However if Obama does not campaign for Hillary in 2012 then he will never again win his US Senate seat either……I will start a campaign against him, and run ads over and over no matter who is running against him if he does not campaign very hard for Hillary in 2012.
Posted by: reality | September 8, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
As an Obama supporter I don’t think Clinton needs to take on Palin. She needs to take on McCain.
Posted by: Willow | September 8, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Interesting?? They want Hilary to play the gendar card? I thought you libs were all for woman equal rights, but is that only when they do not get in the way?
Why can’t Obama campaign as if she is a candidate not a woman candidate, oh thats right he loves playing the race and gendar card, he used sexism against Hilary and not wants Hilary to use it against Palin!
If Hilary does she is done politically, because it will come back to bite (no pun intended)
Jake wheres the post for the suit going forward for Obama to prove his citizenship in PA. He is unable to provide a real birth Certificate and the Democrat leader in PA is bringing him to Federal court to provide true info!!
Posted by: spock | September 8, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Obama refused Florida’s right to determine when it would hold the nomination election, so he now sends Senator Clinton, who had the political savy to at least visit the state, to offer Florida voters a chance to vote.
Wow! What a guy.
Posted by: Billy Bob | September 8, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
The Palin hype is all about nothing the republicans spin doctors and talk radio. Just wait and see how Palin handle reportors and a news conference. Palin and McCain cannot erase the Bush years in office with a convention speech, bad economy, housing in a tail spin Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac on the ropes government step in, war still raging on two fronts, banking, gas around over 3 dollar a gallon, and
America’s image in the world at a all time low.
“McCain best days are still behind him”
Posted by: Lookup | September 8, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
After Hillary & Bill moved out of the hired servants quarters, more commonly known as The White House, the GAO took an inventory of the furnishings, compiled a report listing the items which were missing, damaged, and destroyed. The report is on the GAO website
The report itemizing the items missing, damaged or destroyed is over 200 pages long!
Words cannot begin to describe the lack of class this indicates.
McCain Palin 2008 Bring Class Back To Our Government
Posted by: GeraldD | September 8, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
“Him passing over Hillary for Biden was a complete ego move”.
Obama told Hillary to get back in the kitchen. She has more knowledge now than Obama & Biden will ever have.
Palin, Cindy and Hillary have accomplished a lot for our country what has Michelle accomplished besides running down our country. Michelle couldn’t stand it when Hillary was talking about her achievements all you could see was hate. Is this what we need as a First Lady?
Posted by: societystinks | September 8, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
McCain suddenly chanting ‘Washington is broken’ and wanting to ‘Change’ it and ‘Fix it’ is hilarious and actually a bit sad. He was a member of the party that broke it. He didn’t say anything when the people in his own party were trashing the place. It’s too late to start whining now. He should have seen it coming.
He did not prevent his own party from veering off to the Far Right fringe. In this primary he had to join the same people he called ‘agents of intolerance’ in 2000 and now promises ‘bipartisanship’ and ‘reaching across the aisle’? That’s just pathetic.
He’s doing his best to straddle an ever widening gap between the fringe and the rest of his own party (that’s why he chose Palin). With Palin, it will be impossible for him to lead and unite an even more divided country.
McCain and Palin promise a Washington that is even more paralyzed by gridlock.
McCain should have sticked to his old position and should have stayed clear of the fringe. With hitting the panick button and picking Sarah Palin as his running mate, he has burned his chances. It won’t be long before people are going to realize that. Especially when they see that the only people who are delighted by Sarah Palin, are the same people who are still convinced that Bush has done a heck of a job.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Hillary has to enjoy Obama’s desperation over the past four days.
-he went on O’Reilly
-he admitted the surge worked
-Biden said life begins at conception
-Obama says he won’t change Bush tax cuts
-Obama admits “above my paygrade” was a flip response
Pure panicked desperation.
Posted by: sally | September 8, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
sally, and more of Obama’s interview with O’Reilly this week – Monday though Wednesday I think – when he questions him on his associations.
O’Reilly snared him into the interview with the threat of an alleged 25-part series on Obama – claiming since Obama wouldn’t agree to an interview, they had to do the series instead.
I hope the last thing O’Reilly tells the neophyte is that there IS NO 25-part series and that Obama fell for a bluff.
Posted by: marylou | September 8, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
What case can Clinton make against Palin? That she is inexperienced? Have we forgotten that Palin has more experience that Obama? So if Clinton brings that up she will only be reminding voters of how inexperienced Obama is. Plus, Clinton does not believe Obama belongs in this race at all “Sen McCain brings a lifetime of experience, I bring a lifetime of experience into this race, Sen. Obama brings a speech he gave in 2004″. And she was right. A speech is what he started with, and now he has a series of them. The strongest case against Obama is Obama himself, so not even a master like Clinton can do anything to ease that. Remember, only half of America is stupid, the other half is not.
Posted by: LUKAS SWID | September 8, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
What’s up with Obama not repealing the Bush tax cuts? How is he going to pay for all his handouts? He could easily repeal the cuts with a Dem congress.
So now he’s just going to let them run until they expire – exactly the same as McCain.
Can anyone believe anything Obama says? It’s truly desperation time for the Dems!
Posted by: marylou | September 8, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Do people actually realize that McCain’s investigation of Abramoff was actually driven by revenge? Payback?
Abramoff had financed the people who had smeared him in the 2000 primary. It had nothing to do with ‘cleaning’ Washington, it was pure payback.
The same was true for his much touted McCain-Feingold Bill: Payback. Revenge. Nothing more.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
It’s not about Palin – it’s about Obama’s character!
The hate filled blogs and emails and web pages put together by Obama’s juvenile army speaks volumes about why people are turning away from Obama. The lies and hate do more harm to him than good. And the justification for Obama’s ever shifting positions is laughable.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
does america know that biden is being wined and dined by the lobbyists of the iranian mullahs? is that the foreign policy experience democrats talk about. have you examined his voting record when it comes to iran?
Posted by: michael | September 8, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
“[McCain] didn’t say anything when the people in his own party were trashing the place.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 8, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Bush’s tax cuts will be repealed, don’t worry. The only thing Obama said that he might *delay* it when the economy is in a recession. Obama has no plans to extend the Bush tax cuts *beyond* their expiration date.
But it’s nice to know that she too realizes that the tax cuts for the Rich – which McCains wants to extend – will be desastrous for the budget deficit and the Federal Debt.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
One poll and McBush is claiming victory????
They never asked me whom I like or my wife, or all of our friends…
Barack is an intellectual dynamo in touch with today’s issues. Joe Biden is infinitely more knowledgable than spur of the moment pick Palin. Conventions bring enthusiasm up but the trick will be to keep that excitement going. I was excited from day one about what an Obama presidency will mean for the world and that still has not faded.
No more Karl Rove/Cheney/McCain!
Obama/Biden in 08!
Posted by: James in NY | September 8, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Belle Starr: “cCain bucked the BushCons on “torture”, and everything that goes with it.”
No he didn’t. The CIA was doing the torturing, the CIA is STILL allowed to do the torturing. That was the deal McCain made with Bush.
All McCain did was Grandstanding. Nothing changed in the end.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Obama was interviewed by blowhard O’Reilly.
When will McCain be interviewed by Olbermann?
Want to make a bet?
Never.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Sarah Palin’s Wasilla record:
* Tax collection increased 38%
* Government expenditures up 33%
* Left town in $26 million in debt
* Remodeled office twice in six years
* Bullied local librarian
Posted by: FailinPalin | September 8, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Slice it any way you want, if Obama refuses to reverse Bush’s tax cuts before they expire on their own, he is SUPPORTING those tax cuts in the short-term.
As far as Hillary, she will attack Palin just enough to look like a good democrat, but not enough to actually affect the election.
Posted by: JA | September 8, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Hillary help Obama? Puh-leeeeze, she is just going through the motions to cover any future finger pointing from Dems.
If Hillary at all criticizes Palin some Obama Democrat will charge that her attacks were as “sexist” as the one’s Obama & Co. did on Hillary.
Plus this is the headline Hillary wants to read:
Clinton vs. Palin 2012.
Posted by: Zank | September 8, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Obama has been saying til now that he’ll REPEAL the Bush tax cuts. He has now done a complete flipflop reversal and said that he WON’T? Surprising since this has been the big gun in the class war he’s waged.
McCain has been saying all along that he won’t repeal the tax cuts – but has never said that he would EXTEND them. Add to that, that any extension would require the cooperation and approval of the Dem-lead Congress which is highly unlikely. Therefore, I conclude that when the tax cuts expire in 2010, they won’t be renewed by McCain.
Another case where Obama has done a 180 and now is exactly where McCain has been all along.
Question: Why not just vote McCain?
Posted by: marylou | September 8, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Why are all those socialists who trashed Hillary Clinton now so eager to have her rescue the sinking blowhard? I think it’s called discontinuous thinking.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
@dl
That ‘slip’, as you call it, is the American people failing at the English language, again.
Posted by: justwow | September 8, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
HILLARY DON’T DO IT!!!! WHAT DID OBAMA DO FOR YOU, THE STRONGEST, BRIGHTEST, BEST CANDIDATE? And Bill, ask him and give BO the bird, like he did you! Take a long vacation, get sick and beg off, but don’t kick Palin in the teeth like they did you!
I want a Palin vs. Hillary race in 2012 (as McCain only wants one term).
Please Hillary you owe B. NOTHING.
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
dl: “how about providing a source for your ridiculous assertion.”
The ‘Deal’ was basically: “if the President says it’s not torture, then it’s not torture.”
The people who are being tortured, have NO avenue to CHALLENGE that what they had to endure, constitutes torture.
McCain and Bush/Cheney have given the CIA a legal COVER for what they are doing.
Or read Jane Mayer, “The Dark Side”.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Sally,
you left out obama admitted his “muslim faith”
Posted by: geevill | September 8, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Willem van Oranje
OK – believe whatever you CHOOSE to read.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Hillary knows alot of her supporters have gone over to Palin, so why would she slam her and risk getting them back in 2012? And she needs to stay focused on the issues between the two Prez. candidates…..which at this point who cares…McCan is the man! BO could promise me a pony and I wouldn’t vote for him.
Morris on FOX said long ago, before Palin, this is McCain’s to win as a candidate, and Obama’s to win as a Party….seems the Party of Tolenence blew it again.
McCAIN/PALIN, was a proud Hill supporter
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Gov. Palin is brillant and ambitious politician but this is not the right time for VP. Heaven’s nature a mother of 5, with a pregnant teenage daughter and a 5 month old son with a dawn syndrome. No matter how many maids/servants she has, psychologically her dicision making for our country will be greatly affected if elected. Alaska is only one of 50 States – that’s is 49 plus more responsibilities. Folks lets think about the big picture. It does’nt matter either you are a republican or democrat you have to think twice. Super Mama?.. Vote for Biden and Obama.
Posted by: EG | September 8, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
As we saw in the primaries, no matter what they said, black voters voted for Obama at over 90%. Such a figure suggests that white women will do the same for Sarah Palin, and they will. Obama and his wife were just to arrogant when they chose to snub Hillary Clinton. Now, all the Dems will get from the Clintons is lip service and token support. Who would have thought that Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin would decide this presidential election…
Posted by: No 2 O | September 8, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
And all that the McCainiacs and the Palindrones have to offer is invective, vitriol, slander, hate, distortion, outright lies, and ignorance.
Ask them HOW McCain and Palin want to get us out of this mess and they fall silent.
Because they don’t have any solutions.
Keep on destroying the US. You’re doing a heck of a job.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
I can point to hundreds of articles that say exactly the same. All from renowned journalists who can read fine print.
The ‘Deal’ McCain had to make was to allow the CIA from continuing to torture AND to give them legal cover.
It’s Bush, Cheney, and the CIA who won in the end. Because they could continue to do what they were doing all along.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Clinton is smart she is not going to give any fuel to that conversation and if Obama is smart he will do the same.
Posted by: Me | September 8, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Willem van Oranje
I could site a couple of articles about Obama’s support of Infanticide.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Georgetown University law professor Marty Lederman writes of the so-called “compromise” between Senators McCain/Graham/Warner and President Bush.
“U.S. to be First Nation to Authorize Violations of Geneva”
Google it, it’s on CBS news.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
dl: “I suppose you’d believe that too.”
No. Because I know how to rebut it.
You can’t about the socalled ‘Deal’.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Now, after Obama’s kids made such a big deal out of him visiting the 9/11 site, it seems Obama himself has decided to attend. Now, you’ll hear silence from the fools.
Why do we need Obama if he constantly changes to McCain’s viewpoint?
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
The risk John McCain took in selecting Sarah Palin as his running mate is comparable to the 72-year-old ex-fighter pilot knocking back two shots and flying his A-4 under the Golden Gate Bridge.
McCain’s choice of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his co-pilot was the biggest gamble in presidential history.
As of now, it is paying off, big-time.
The sensational selection in Dayton, Ohio, stepped all over the big story from Denver – Obama’s powerful address to 85,000 cheering folks in Mile High Stadium, and 35 million nationally, a speech that vaulted him from a 2-point deficit early in the week to an 8-point margin.
Obama had never before reached 49 percent against McCain.
As the Democrats were being rudely stepped on, however, Palin ignited an explosion of enthusiasm among conservatives, evangelicals, traditional Catholics, gun owners and right to lifers not seen in decades.
By passing over his friends Joe Lieberman and Tom Ridge, and picking Palin, McCain has given himself a fighting chance of winning the White House that, before Friday morning, seemed to be slipping away.
Indeed, the bristling reaction on the left testifies to Democrat fears that the choice of Palin could indeed be a game-changer in 2008.
Liberals howl that Palin has no experience, no qualifications to be president of the United States.
But the lady has more executive experience than McCain, Joe Biden and Obama put together.
None of them has ever started or run a business as Palin did.
None of them has run a giant state like Alaska, which is larger than California and Texas put together.
And though Alaska is not populous, Gov. Palin has as many constituents as Nancy Pelosi or Joe Biden.
She has no foreign policy experience, we are told.
And though Alaska’s neighbors are Canada and Russia, the point is valid.
But from the day she takes office, Palin will get daily briefings and sit on the National Security Council with the president and secretaries of state, treasury and defense.
She will be up to speed in her first year.
And her experience as governor of Alaska, dealing with the oil industry and pipeline agreements with Canada, certainly compares favorably with that of Barack Obama, a community organizer who dealt in the mommy issues of food stamps and rent subsidies.
Where Obama has poodled along with the Daley Machine, Palin routed the Republican establishment, challenging and ousting a sitting GOP governor before defeating a former Democratic governor to become the first female and youngest governor in state history.
For his boldness in choosing Palin, McCain deserves enormous credit.
He has made an extraordinary gesture to conservatives and the party base, offering his old antagonists a partner’s share in his presidency.
And his decision is likely to be rewarded with a massive and enthusiastic turnout for the McCain-Palin ticket.
Rarely has there been such an outburst of enthusiasm on the right.
In choosing Palin, McCain may also have changed the course of history as much as Ike did with his choice of Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan did with his choice of George H.W. Bush.
For should this ticket win, Palin will eclipse every other Republican as heir apparent to the presidency and will have her own power base among lifers, evangelicals, gun folks and conservatives – wholly independent of President McCain.
A traditional conservative on social issues, Palin has become, overnight, the most priceless political asset the movement has.
Look for the neocons to move with all deliberate speed to take her into their camp by pressing upon her advisers and staff, and steering her into the AEI-Weekly Standard-War Party orbit.
Indeed, if McCain defeats Obama, 2012 could see women on both national tickets, given McCain’s age and the possibility he intends to serve a single term, women at the top of both – Sarah vs. Hillary.
The arrival of Palin on the national scene, with her youth, charisma and vitality, probably also portends a changing of the guard in Washington.
With Republicans having zero chance of capturing either House, and but a slim chance of avoiding losses in both, a Vice President Palin, with her reputation as a rebel and reformer, would surely inspire similar revolts in the Republican caucuses.
As Thomas Jefferson said, from time to time, a little rebellion in the political world is as necessary as storms in the physical.
The Palin nomination could backfire, but it is hard to see how.
She has passed her first test, her introduction to the nation, with wit and grace.
And the Obama-Biden ticket, having already alienated millions of women with the disrespecting of Hillary, is unlikely to start attacking another woman whose sole offense is that she had just been given the chance to break the glass ceiling at the national level.
Her nomination, which will bring the Republican right home, also frees up McCain to appeal to moderates and liberals, which has long been his stock in trade.
With his selection of Sarah Palin, John McCain has not only shaken up this election, he may have helped shape the future of the United States – and much for the better.
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: No 2 O | September 8, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Hillary’s right to stick with the issues and not fall into the McCain/Rove trap of making this a non-issue, personality driven campaign. Unemployment has hit a 5 year high. 9.2% of home owners are either late on mortgage payments or in default.
Voters are going to want answers on how their problems are going to be solved, not more spin, division, distraction, and distortion. Leave that stuff to the Republicans. It’s about the only thing they’ve proven to be good at.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 8, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
“The proposal would make the core protections of Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions irrelevant and unenforceable. It deliberately provides a ‘get out of jail free card’ to the administration’s top torture officials, and backdates that card nine years.
“Also under the proposal, the president would have the authority to declare what is — and what is not — a grave breach of the War Crimes Act, making the president his own judge and jury. This provision would give him unilateral authority to declare certain torture and abuse legal and sound. In a telling move, during a call with reporters today, National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley would not even answer a question about whether waterboarding would be permitted under the agreement.
“The agreement would also violate time-honored American due process standards by permitting the use of evidence coerced through cruel and abusive treatment. We urge lawmakers to stand firm in their commitment to American values and reject this charade of a compromise.”
Adds the Washington Post editorial page:
“In effect, the agreement means that U.S. violations of international human rights law can continue as long as Mr. Bush is president, with Congress’s tacit assent.”
In the end, McCain got loads of admiring press coverage. And Bush got almost everything he wanted.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
These so called Obama’s supporter feels Hillary should make a case for Obama are completely wrong. If Obama is dependent on others and cannot make a sale for himself then what is the use he may not be able to sale his “Change” ideas when he is in the White house.
Posted by: Test | September 8, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Obama is wrapping his lips around every tire valve he can find to inflate the tires and solve the energy problem. It’s amazing what a bag of hot air can accomplish!
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
McCain’s VP pick shows he is committed to reform in Washington, while Obama (the so-called change agent) picked a VP candidate who is firmly tied to the Washington business-as-usual establishment. The Republican party faithful are talking about Palin as the next Reagan. What are the Democrats saying about Biden? Nothing. McCain wins big on the VP pick.
This pick also gives McCain a big edge over Obama in perceived judgment. In picking Biden Obama’s first major decision was conventional and was a bust; while McCain’s, which went against the conventional wisdom, demonstrated that McCain has better judgment when making a decision that counts.
The Democrats rolled out the same old party hacks in their convention, and Obama’s acceptance speech was a bore, delivered against an over-the-top Hollywood backdrop. McCain’s speech was deadening, but Palin’s speech accomplished something no other Republican was able to do: electrify the base. Score another for McCain.
In the debates Palin will skewer Biden. Take a look at her Alaskan debates to see how she handles blowhard politicians.
Hard to predict what McCain will do against Obama in the debates. Still, McCain does better in an unscripted format, and he is the genuine article. Obama does well only in front of a teleprompter intoning vague platitudes, and Obama is basically a golem constructed by the DNC out of old parts from the party platform. The debates will likely favor McCain.
Posted by: David H | September 8, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Mommy Hillary owes Obama and his supporters “nothing, nada, zip”, to quote from some speech I heard last week. If Obama loses, it is not Mommy Hillary’s fault, the DNC and Obama made there views of Hillary very clear during the primaries. Pelosi, Dean, Kerry, and Richardson can kiss her a$$ as far as I’m am concerned. Palin has shown more respect to Hillary than the DNC’s motley crue have. You break it , you bought it….period.
Posted by: Jim | September 8, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
It is NOT Hillary Clinton’s responsibility to do Obama/Biden’s dirty work for them. Last time I checked the Dems dissed Hillary and went for the “mighty” duo of Obama/Biden – yes, a very grand error on the part of the Democrats. As such, Hillary Clinton should do what is wise and get as far away as possible from Obama/Biden and let them lose this election on their own. It is NOT her role or responsibility to take on Palin.
Hillary – take a long holiday and return on November 5 and take back the party which has been ruined by radical liberals who have no clue about unifying middle America.
Posted by: Disgusted Democrat | September 8, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
I heard a pundit say that in a soft economy it actually hurts Obama and voters are more inclined to go with a sure thing, McCain. Makes sense to me. I don’t want BO upping my taxes to pay for his socialized more government American. Keep my freedoms….vote McCain/Palin. McCain is going to appoint Republicans AND DEMOCRATS in his cabinet….he said the best and the brightest and if any are wealthy, they will have to accept $1 a year salary…McCain is the unifier….Obama is divisive…..oh and inexperienced, and REALLY LACKING IN JUDGEMENT (Wright, Ayers, Rezko).
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
The DNC leadership selected/coronated Obama to represent them and fight for them because they said he was the stronger candidate.
How strong does he look now when he needs and begs for Hillary to do his dirty work for him? If he can’t get his hands dirty and do his own dirty work what kind of president would he make?
BO– here’s a “little news flash.” You didn’t want Hillary to be your VP so don’t go crying about how she won’t be your attack dog. That’s why you picked Biden, remember? Grow up.
Posted by: Elizabeth | September 8, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Obama and his motley DNC crue of Pelosi, Dean, Reid, and Kerry can “bite it”. Hillary owes them “nothing..nada…zip”.
Posted by: Jim | September 8, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Obama’s nitwits called Hillary every name in the book and now, they’re begging her to save a failed campaign.
I can hardly stop laughing!
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Why don’t Obama send his biggest surrogate & sponsor like Nancy Pelosi or Donna Brazile?
They are female. They can do the dirty job for Obama.
Hillary was not worthy to be on Obama’s ticket. Surely she’s not worthy to do the dirty job for Obama.
Posted by: EGNAHC08 | September 8, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Ok Libs stop saying who McCain should of picked.
Obama picked the third most leaning liberal in the Senate, #2 being Kennedy, and #1 Obama himself!!
So I say Obama should of picked Lieberman!!
Posted by: spock | September 8, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
It’s in Hillary’s best interest to campaign for Obama.
Posted by: annie | September 8, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Wake up and ask yourself “Am I better off now than I was four years ago.” If you answer yes – then McCain is your man.
Posted by: Dee | September 8, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Many bad losers are still crowding these blogs, or GOP losers portraying themselves as Hillary losers.
Let me guarantee you, as someone who worked for the Clinton campaign, that all THREE Clintons are wholeheartedly supportive of Barack Obama in the Presidential election.
Don’t let any misers fool you.
BTW the Clintons have been abundantly clear about their great support during the Democratic Convention.
The rest is lies and spins.
Posted by: Greta | September 8, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
I am a independent voter but was supporting Hillary Clinton. But I can not support a socialist who thinks a woman with a college degree should get food stamps instead of going to work to support her family. He thinks that hard-working families in small towns and rural areas who support themselves and live within their own means are less American and less important. How can anyone think that it is right for generations of people to be so lazy and irresponsible they have the right to be supported by other people’s hard work and sweat. Our country was founded on individual responsibility and hard work. Obama is a socialist/communist/Marxist from the core out.
The Clintons will forever be scared by supporting this man. He has divided the country, not united it.
Posted by: Mary | September 8, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
And Palin’s Flying Monkeys Brigade is in full Combat Mode.
Why am I reminded of 1933?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
After all, what’s the difference between Sarah Palin and George W. Bush?
Lipstick.
Posted by: Eisenhower | September 8, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Since the good ‘ol boy network is alive and well in democrat land, is it any surprise that Hillary supporters think with their brains and not their family jewels? Hmm. Barbie, does that make the chest pumping men feel stronger? Truth is that women represent power…and the reason men are so visceral to a woman running this country is out of fear. As a little boy, mom had all the power. And as a married man, your wife has all the power. Now we have to deal with this as leader of the free world? It’s just too much for us to bear isn’t it guys? Be honest. You can’t stand the fact that a woman is in charge…it eviscerates you doesn’t it? Almost like a rape. And so BO did we had to…he put an insider on the ticket…
Shore up his weaknesses. Biden…change? Twenty-six years in the Senate…what change does that represent? Consistent messaging on BO’s part. So if I’m voting for character I want someone who’s consistent.
I also want someone who’s strategic. BO fails, McCain wins.
I want someone bi-partisan. Who’s demonstrated that? BO fails, McCains wins.
I want someone who’s going to reform the BS and wasteful spending…
Who’s demonstrated that? BO fails, McCain wins.
I want someone who’s going to change the future of this country…
Who’s demonstrated that? Neither.
Now what am I going to do? I don’t know. I guess I’ll go back and look at character. I’ll evaluate their ability to be put good people around them…and then I’ll keep evaluating what they do and say. I’ll evaluate their relationships with people.
Posted by: Daddyjava | September 8, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Palin is a Talking Doll – Youwant to start going after endorsers that a dangerous road to go on because you should check on who endorses Obama,- Iran, Al Qeada, Hamas, Hezbollah, Chavez, Razko, William ayers, Rev Wright, Michelle Obama, the DNC, all of which and more Obama should denounce!
Posted by: spock | September 8, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Greta… yeah, sure, whatever you say. Why doesn’t Pelosi go after Palin? Why?
Posted by: Jim | September 8, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Obama – Pelosi’s boy!
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Willey van Orange…I am reminded of 1933 also, but I think we are seeing Obama as “The Tin Man”
Posted by: Jim | September 8, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
CNN has Obama and McCain tied again.
End of the Bounce?
Already?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Yes, I am better off now than I was when Bush took office. My expenses eat up only half of my income but if Obama gets into office, my surplus will be eaten away by higher taxes. Obama needs to go back and study economics 101 and 102. Small businesses furnish the majority of the jobs and if over-taxed, will close. Individuals with extra cash invest in businesses that furnish jobs and pay reasonable taxes.
No, Obama has been running his big mouth, saying a lot of words, making empty promises but has no real or viable solutions to anything unless he can use more tax money for worthless causes–like his Trinity Church received. Seems, he has spent a million dollars a day since he has been a Senator for causes that only help a few selected people.
HOPE AND CHANGE are his key words, it should be RESPONSIBILITY starting with himself. He is as fake as those styrofoam Greek columns on his stage.
Posted by: Mary | September 8, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Bill and Hillary Clinton are loyal Democrats doing their duty for the party by giving token support for the party candidate…
Nothing more…
If you really want to see how the Clintons view Obama, just go back to the primary for some quotes…
And, they were right…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Hahahah.
I just saw footage from a McCain – Palin rally.
McCain was pushed aside like he was some sort of fifth wheel on a wagon.
What a fool.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Actually, CNN just came out with McCain/Palin ahead of Obama/Biden with an expected surge after the Palin interviews this week…
Of course, as an Obama slanted network, CNN was the last network to admit what the Gallup polls already showed…
Are you watching reruns to feel better, William?
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
932 million dollars earmarked pork barrel spending….THAT’S WHAT OBAMA HAS DONE SINCE BEING IN THE SENATE. McCain is going to make every name known that comes his way for this waste of American tax dollars.
McCAIN/PALIN!
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Gov. Sarah Palin made her first potentially major gaffe.
She claimed that lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had “gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers.”
What a nitwit.
The companies operate as private companies. The *takeover* may result in a huge cost for taxpayers.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Complaints from Obamabots about the support that Hillary Clinton has offered their miserable messiah’s campaign are ridiculous. Since conceding in June, Hillary has done a lot more than Obama to unify the party. She has been gracious and supportive, while Obama has been dismissive, refusing to even consider her for VP. Obama assumed that he had the women’s vote locked up. I for one hope that his arrogant assumption, proves to be the unravelling of his campaign.
Posted by: NJH | September 8, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
And, Todd and Sarah Palin didn’t need a fist bump to get their point across.
Both parents and the entire Palin family were center stage.
By the way, Obama supposedly supports public schools while he sends his children to private schools with Secret Service escort…
And where was Momma Obama?
Anybody But Obama…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
A new national poll taken entirely after the end of the Republican convention suggests the race for the White House between John McCain and Barack Obama is dead even.
McCain and Obama are tied at 48 percent each, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll out Monday afternoon.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Palin knows as much about economy as McCain.
Nothing. Absolute nitwits.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
McCain and Palin are against wasteful pork barrel spending! McCAIN/PALIN!
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
And, Todd and Sarah Palin didn’t need a fist bump to get their point across.
What’s wrong with a fist bump????????
Posted by: ? | September 8, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Let’s see…
The Federal National Mortgage Association, nicknamed Fannie Mae, and the Federal Home Mortgage Corporation, nicknamed Freddie Mac, have operated since 1968 as government sponsored enterprises (GSEs). Note the term “government sponsored.”
This means that, although the two companies are privately owned and operated by shareholders, they are protected financially by the support of the Federal Government. Note the term “Federal Government.”
And, the Federal Government is supported by…taxpayers…
Specifically, these government protections include access to a line of credit through the U.S. Treasury, exemption from state and local income taxes and exemption from SEC oversight.
Although we don’t expect Sarah Palin to be perfect, the only gaffe came from Willem van Oranje…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Willem van Oranje
McCain/Palin – just what the economy needed. Hell, even Obama now agrees with McCain’s hold on tax reductions.
Obama – nitwit economist.
McCain – genius economist.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
McCain – genius economist.
Posted by: dl | Sep 8, 2008 12:52:36 PM
hahahahahaaa, you’re joking right. He’s the first to say he doesn’t know anything about the ecomomy.
Posted by: ? | September 8, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
I don’t want to pay for the most inexperienced Prez in history to hire 300 advisors to tell him how to find the toilet in the WH. HE WILL BE THE MOST ADVISOR DRIVEN PRESIDENT OF ALL TIME! No thanks! I also don’t want to pay for triple the Secret Service….
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Willem:
Turn on your television and make sure you are on a live broadcast…
CNN now shows McCain/Palin to be one point ahead of Obama/Biden…
Even with the CNN bias for Obama…
Gallup polls show an even higher McCain/Palin lead…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice offered “a less-than-hearty endorsement” of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s foreign policy experience.
“She’s governor of a state here in the United States,” said Rice. Pressed if Palin has “enough experience to handle the kinds of things” she handles, Rice added that “there are different kinds of experiences in life that help one to deal with matters of foreign policy.”
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Hillary owes Obama NOTHING!
Not vetted.
Not selected.
He attacked her with sexist remarks.
His campaign labeled Bill Clinton a racist.
McCain 2008
Hillary 2012
Posted by: Mark | September 8, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Jayhawk: This is from CNN’s own website:
updated 29 minutes ago
McCain and Obama are tied at 48 percent each, according to a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll out Monday afternoon.
Three percent of voters are undecided, according to the survey.
The CNN/Opinion Research Corporation poll questioned 1,022 registered voters by telephone. The survey, conducted Friday through Sunday, has a sampling error of plus or minus three percentage points.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
As Hillary said…Sen. McCain and I have a lifetime of experience we bring to the WH…..BO has a speech he gave in 2004.
As Bill said…..this is a fairytail (in reference to BO)..he also spoke of Chicago thugs (BO political cronies that helped him cheat against Alice Palmer)
As Biden said…he is good looking and clean and articulate…for an African American….storybook, man
Plus Biden would rather be running with his good buddy McCain. WE KNOW THEY ARE THE CLOSER FRIENDS, c’mon.
McCain is going to put the best and brightest Reps AND DEMS in his cabinet, maybe even Biden….so he could still be in the picture.
When is the final blow going to happen with the Rev. Wright tape?
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Poor Palin. Economists think she’s a nitwit:
Economists and analysts pounced on the misstatement, saying it demonstrated a lack of understanding about one of the key economic issues likely to face the next administration.
“You would like to think that someone who is going to be vice president and conceivable president would know what Fannie and Freddie do,” said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. “These are huge institutions and they are absolutely central to our country’s mortgage debt. To not have a clue what they do doesn’t speak well for her, I’d say.”
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Willem van Oranje:
Biden has been earning a 6-figure government income for 27 years and has a net worth of $150,000.
Talk about an economic ‘nitwit’.
Obama cannot even settle on a less expensive home he can afford on his own without the help of a convicted felon.
Talk about an economic ‘nitwit”.
Posted by: DEM 4 McCain | September 8, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Come on Hillary; Give the Witch a black eye. No one can do it better then you can and oh she so deserves one.
Posted by: Ranger Phx | September 8, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Let’s see…
Bill Clinton was the governor of a small, midwestern state before being elected President.
Most Democrats didn’t see his experience as Governor of Arkansas as a detriment, but rather as a signficant attribute.
So, the same experience of running a state (even a small one) is a positive rather than a negative.
By the way, Rice’s tone and comments reflect someone who realizes that she should be concentrated on her job as Secretary of State.
Get a grip, Willem…
Have you found a live broadcast, yet?
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
If Obama has any grit he should
dump Biden as a non-performing
asset – NOW.
Biden is a slob.
Younger guys sometimes come under
the influence of old men like Biden.
Biden has a way of humoring younger
men by saying things like, Look
at me I’m all shot, look at you,
you are young and handsome, and
man, you should have seen me at
your age, I was quite a ladies’
man you know, my wife you know she’s
drop dead gorgeous, you know, my
roving eye, my old sexcapades with
women, you know, she keeps a tight
leash on me, great woman…
And some younger guys start
thinking, This Joe! he’s one heck
of a guy…
That’s probably what happened to
Obama in the Senate.
Biden should be shown the door
without wasting any more time
if Obama and the Dems are serious
about winning this election.
Posted by: anon | September 8, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
What is the difference between Obama and McCain??
Criminals, terrorists, crazy religious pastors, out-landish spending, lies and cocaine use. All this on the Obama’s side.
Posted by: Martin | September 8, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Jayhawk: RealClearPolitics says the same.
I think you’re seeing old footage.
National CNN McCain 48, Obama 48 Tie
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Gallup:
54% McCain
44% Obama
I supported Hillary but I do not support Nancy Pelosi’s puppet, Obama.
Posted by: Steve | September 8, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Jake, what is your problem? Why do you keep looking for ulterior motives with Hillary? She says she will not attack Palin, yet you keep asking will she? You keep saying Obama people are asking: will she?
What kind of bias is this?! Leave her alone man! Jeez!
Posted by: Chude | September 8, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
“There are Obama supporters who feel Clinton needs to make a strong case against Palin. And they are intrigued — and troubled — by the fact that she won’t.” – Jake Tapper
——————
Are these the same Obama supporters who trashed Hillary Clinton and called her all kinds of unprintable names, and wanted her thrown out of the Democrat Party?
Now that Obama is failing, they want Hillary to win the election for him. Isn’t that rich?
Posted by: OxyCon | September 8, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Biden, please go home.
Have a Good Day!
Hillary should have been
hands down the first choice.
Putting her on the ticket
now will strengthen it
enormously and generate a
groundswell positive publicity.
Obama and the Dems have a choice.
Keep Biden and lose the election
or put Hillary on the ticket and
win it.
Posted by: anon | September 8, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Willem van Oranje:
Read and learn…
The collapse of the national housing market in the wake of the Great Depression discouraged private lenders from investing in home loans…
Fannie Mae was established in order to provide local banks with federal money to finance home mortgages in an attempt to raise levels of home ownership and the availability of affordable housing. Note the term “federal money.”
Initially, Fannie Mae operated like a national savings and loan, allowing local banks to charge low interest rates on mortgages for the benefit of the home buyer.
This led to the development of what is now known as the secondary mortgage market.
Within the secondary mortgage market, companies such as Fannie Mae are able to borrow money from foreign investors at low interest rates because of the financial support that they receive from the U.S. Government. Note, “from the U.S. Government.”
It is this ability to borrow at low rates that allows Fannie Mae to provide fixed interest rate mortgages with low down payments to home buyers.
Now, Willem, what do you not understand about the relationship between the “the U.S. Government” and “federal money” and the relationship to taxpayers?
No rocket science, here…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Palin thinks that Freddie Mac is either a blues guitarist or a hot dish made with elbow macaroni.
Posted by: bluto | September 8, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
And Jayhawk, did you see the footage where McCain was pushed aside by that pitbull with lipstick?
He stood there besides her, sulking and trying to put on his bravest smile, all the while thinking: “My God, What Have I DONE!!!”
It was hilarious.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Jayhawk
And, Obama got a sweetheart deal from a mortgage company as did many in congress. In return, they looked the other way.
Never a word from the democratic watchdog committees. Never a word!
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Hillary campaigning for Obama will not change the status of the polls. Palin is more popular than Hillary and her picture is on all the magazines. She is a match for Hillary, Obama and Biden in a debate. Its too late for Hillary and she should have been a stronger woman when campaigning. There is no grass growing under Palin’s feet. She will talk back. Several thousand of people were at his campaigning in Missouri and the other day there were twelve thousand in New Mexico. The crowds are getting larger and his polls are going up.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 8, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Yes Jayhawk.
The BAILOUT is the ‘Government Assistence’. That’s taxpayers money.
When they operated on their own, they didn’t cost the taxpayers any money.
NOW they do.
Palin said they “had gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers.”
No honey, the WILL become expensive for the US taxpayers. Now, with the Bailout.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 8, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Actually, Willem,
Just heard this a moment ago…
CNN’s Poll of polls shows:
McCain: 47%
Obama: 46%
Unsure: 7%
Are you sure you are watching live television?
Or, is the shock just too great?
By the way, Gallup shows:
McCain: 54%
Obama: 44%
Just gets worse, doesn’t it…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Willem van Oranje: How would you like to debate that pitbull Palin? I can assure you of a loss. She can match Hillary, Biden and Obama when it comes time to debate. Obama lost all the debates with Hillary and lost in the forum interview. How would he run this country? Maybe to the ground.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 8, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
270 electoral votes needed to win.
Obama 273
McCain 265
Posted by: anon | September 8, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
So now you have to be a good debater in order to run this country. I didn’t read that in the job description.
Posted by: Nicky | September 8, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Why aren’t the corrupt do-nothing democrats making hay out of the mortgage mess? Because it was created by them as they granted favors and looked the other way by lobbyists.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Well, Willem,
You just don’t seem to get it.
The issue is not whether another bailout will cost taxpayers.
It will.
What you don’t seem to understand is that both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have always been supported with federal funds.
The operation and bailout both cost the taxpayers.
Pretty simple…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
I love Hillary and respect her for her stance. She can be critical of Palin on the issues – that is fine. I am an avid Hillary supporter and she will continue to have my respect and support as long as she does not say horrible sexist remarks about Palin. If she does, it will be hypocritical and it won’t go down well. Hillary stands for women, their fight against what is happening with Palin, and all those millions cracks in the glass ceiling. If the Obamakins want to smear and be sexist against Palin, they can use the same women (they have a GREAT supply of them) who smeared and hated Hillary when she ran.
Palin 2008 – Hillary 2012!
Posted by: Beckie | September 8, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
jayjay: I guarantee you that Biden will watch his words with Palin and so would Hillary. She is an attacker and knows what to say back. I can’t wait for that debate and it will be view by more than 40 million which she got in her convention speech compared to Obama’s 38 million. Even McCain got 39 million. The democrates are at a loss and had to call up Bill and Hillary Clinton and they like a fool are campaigning for him. But that will not change the polls as long as Palin is the running mate.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 8, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
anon: Even if Obama puts Hillary on the ticket she will not win against Palin. I can guarantee there are democrats switching over and it will continue. I believe the women in Florida will be voting for McCain. Not every woman in this country is democrat. Obama is a failure and will not win the election. Pail is too popular and it will get greater the more she campaigns.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 8, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
And now, Obama’s biggest supporter (Oprah) has proven herself to be a racist. Maybe Obama learned his race-baiting techniques from her.
Just a thought.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Her novelty has already worn
off. Palin lies through her
teeth about practically
everything.
She’s a shrill whippersnapper.
She possesses neither the range
nor the depth of knowledge the
job demands. She has no gravitas.
She’ll bite the dust in a couple
of weeks.
Posted by: anon | September 8, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Umm, can someone point me toward the independent, trailblazing lib women we’ve heard about over the decades? That’s been their claim for years and they jump when dem men snap their finger. They are openly attacking a women for BEING the person they falsely claimed they were.
Hillary dutifully cleaned up after Bill and now she’s being asked to be Obama’s attack dog. Other lib women are being ‘sicced’ on Governor Palin and they dutifully oblige.
Again, please point me to the take-no-crap, we’re strong, mind of our own, get outta my way I’ve got a career, lib women?????
Anyone, Buehler, Buehler?!
For the group that chanted, ‘I am woman – hear me roar’, they have joined lib men in a collective whimper over Governor Palin.
And I’m loving every minute of it.
Posted by: Dee | September 8, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
People, if you didn’t know Oprah was the biggest racist in the business you’ve been wearing rose colored glasses. It should not be a surprise.
Posted by: Peggy | September 8, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
After all that went on in the primary, does anyone, Republican or Democrat, really believe that Hillary Clinton will cast her vote for Obama?
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Where is Chris Dodd? It’s his committee.
Posted by: geevill | September 8, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
As soon as Obama heard McCain was going the the 9/11 site, he announced he would go to. Obama – pretending to be a leader but following all the time!
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
And, with the government moving in to stabilize the housing market, the stock market is reacting favorably.
A step in the right direction…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 8, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
What she had a week ago was
the surprise element from
the McCain gimmickry and her
novelty. That’s all gone now.
When Palin comes out of her
hiding and starts talking
to the media and the people
without a script in front of
her, she will be a damp squib.
Not only will she reveal her
vast ignorance but also her
unpleasant, sandpaper
personality. Every she appears
in public she’ll turn off
more and more people.
Posted by: anon | September 8, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Sarah Palin is that crazed lady who took over as chair of your school board one year in a stealth fundamentalist Christian takeover, picked fights with the library, the superintendant and the teacher’s union, wasted months on trying to ram through a creationist biology curriculum and a scientfically false absention sex ed program, triggered half a dozen lawsuits and finally destroyed the budget. Two years, endless local newspaper headlines, one teacher strike and $5M in attorney’s fees and lawsuit settlements later, the crazed lady and her friends are voted out and you have regained control of your local public school district. But nobody’s education has improved in the meantime.
Sarah Palin is exactly that crazed lady, and we’ll pay the price if we let her into our national government.
Posted by: Dollared | September 8, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Hillary is qualified to be President – Palin is not so Hillary has no reason to engage her. She should go after the ticket as a whole and what it means to America to have 4 more years of the SAME.
Posted by: NMP | September 8, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Obama/Biden
The real Bridge To Nowhere.
Posted by: sally | September 8, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Obamabots song to Sarah Palin
YOU ARE MY OBSESSION!!!!!
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
The expectations of Obama’s supporters are ridiculous.
They expect Hillary to go out and attack McCain’s vice-presidential pick as if she herself were Obama’s running mate, and not Biden.
Hillary is campaigning for herself in 2012 already, make no mistake about it.
She will pay lip service as much as she needs to regarding Obama, but I wouldn’t expect anything more.
Posted by: SandyB | September 8, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Soon came November. The DNC base had scattered everywhere. There was no Kool Aid left. The Obamabots were thirsty for CHANGE and began to starve but Obama had no substance to give them. The Obamabots went to the voters they had alienated and called names to ask for help for Obama. The voters replied “You lazy fool Obamabots! The whole summer you danced and sang at the convention and chose the wrong NOMINEE AND VP not thinking about our party’s future. Go away now, we are voting for McCain/Palin and we can’t help you”.
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Here is a little dose of reality.Hilary is just going to stick to the issues which I think will be McCain’s/Palin’s downfall.Oprah said that she would not use her show for ANY candidate and that after the election she would be glad to interview Palin.Obama decided BEFORE McCain to go to the 911 site-Does it really matter?While all this hype is going on about Palin please take time to look at her closer.Voting against funding for PRAGNANT TEENS,leaving Wasilla in debt,using her power to fire SEVERAL PEOPLE,and there is more-just look her up.Can some one tell me if McCain really threw out a vetran from the convention .
Posted by: Maria | September 8, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
The expectations of Obama’s supporters are ridiculous.
They expect Hillary to go out and attack McCain’s vice-presidential pick as if she herself were Obama’s running mate, and not Biden.
_______________________________
OBAMA’S so called experience has caused him to make some pretty stupid errors during this campaign. If I were Hillary I would stay at home with “cramps” as an excuse for not campaigning for him.
Hillary: “Barack, I am sorry Bill and I can’t make that race baiting hate rally the Obamabots have scheduled for voters in Cleveland. Can I take a raincheck? “
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
The Obama campaign has to use Hillary to take Palin down. Nobody else can do it. But Hillary should not do it, not if she has the best interests of the country at heart.
Hillary has to know that it is irrelevant whether a Democrat or Republican wins the presidency. Either way it will it will be business as usual.
If, however, Palin becomes vice president she will have a real shot at the presidency, either by replacing McCain or by running in 2012.
What this country needs is a woman president — any woman president. A woman president will fundamentally change our country’s image of itself. It will move it away from the paleolithic man-on-top mentality. This will ultimately favor progressives even if the woman is a conservative.
And, in many important respects Palin is not a traditional conservative. In her household she is the most important breadwinner, and her husband Todd is willing to fulfill the role of homemaker. This is not your typical a-woman’s-place-is-in-the-home situation.
Hurray for Sarah and Todd. This is the kind of image our daughters need to see.
Posted by: David H | September 8, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Agree with Samantha.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 8, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Maria said:
Palin please take time to look at her closer.Voting against funding for PRAGNANT TEENS,leaving Wasilla in debt,using her power to fire SEVERAL PEOPLE,and there is more-just look her up.
_______________________________________
Obama please take time to look at him closer. Leaving Maytag workers in a lurch, Buying a home from slum lord Tony Rezko, Hanging out with people who bombed the US capital and felt they still didn’t do enough, attending a racist church for 20 years, committing a felony by using cocaine, not wanting to wear a US flag pin, and there is more- just look him up.
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
This isn’t the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere.
Posted by: Sandra S | September 8, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
>>>Posted by: No 2 O | Sep 8, 2008 11:49:11 AM
___
Thank you for an excellent post which is not only enlightening, but which was written in accordance with my very own opinions ;-)
Posted by: AMERICAN*CENTRIST | September 8, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
RL in Illinois, me Illinois too. How this snake slithered from the windy city is beyond me. He hasn’t done jack here.
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
This isn’t the first time a boss has picked an unqualified woman just because she agrees with him and opposes everything most other women want and need. Feminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere.
____________________________________
So did you vote for Hillary? Or was she unqualified?
“It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere.”
Good, so then you won’t care when Hillary supporters choose to vote for McCain.
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Why should Hillary directly get into the mud with Palin where Karl Rove wants her to go. No. Palin and McCain will hang themselves on the economy, at their church of tax cuts for the wealthy and on the discredited trickle down theory.
It would be nice if you would point out, Jake, Palin’s gaffe today on the economy where she said that what is happening to Fannie Mae is good because Fannie Mae had always cost the government too much money. This shows that she does not even understand the basic economics of the bailout. It also shows that she will hang herself every time that she doesn’t have the exact talking point from her handlers to reach for.
Please report the gaffe.
Posted by: Mary | September 8, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Facts you should know about Palin’s record:
1. In 2003, Mayor Palin left behind almost $19 million in long term debt in her town of 7,084 people.
S2. he opposed funding for a state preschool program in Alaska but support teaching creationism in schools.
3. She was for the so-called Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it. While campaigning for Governor she supported the bridge and called the term offensive. On the national level, she reversed her position and now uses the term. I believe she has also kept the $47 million in funds that Alaska received from our tax money for this so called bridge.
S4. he is strongly anti-choice opposing abortion even in cases of rape and incest.
5. She is among a shrinking group of politicians what are skeptical that humans are responsible for climate change. She also wanted to take polar bears off the endangered species list. (My comment: no doubt to continue murdering these creatures under the activity called ‘sport hunting’)
Posted by: Sandra S | September 8, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
dl at 1:46….true that Obama got wind of McCain going to Ground Zero on 9/11 and he had to copy? I completely believe that as he would’t have a patriotic idea in his overly large head to accomodate his ego. McCain had all the servicemen stand up today at his rally in Missouri…way to go McCain.
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Debra,
The DNC has become the very thing it used to hate and fight against.
The Donkey has become a racist, sexist, fear mongering jacka$$
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Don’t ever forget the sacrifices Obama has made for this country:
19 months of hotel food and airplane rides.
Only one candidate has truly fought for us… McCain
Posted by: sally | September 8, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Dems, Please note that some of the posters on this board, particularly the ones that continue to throw GIGO at every comment made, are Republican operatives who trawl the networks trying to spread chaos and doubt. That is their purpose in life.
Vote on November 4th as your heart tells you. Nothing is decided on these boards which are great for venting and setting forth opinions. The trawlers don’t have opinions, they are armed with misrepresentations meant to discredit their opponent. They are like the technical phone support folks who have a sheet with every possible answer to a troubleshooting problem.
The true test will be the results on November 4th, and no matter what anyone says, we will not know the verdict until then.
Posted by: Sandra S | September 8, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The Democratic Convention was all about the coronation of Obama ($6 million Temple)
The Republican Convention was about America–Country First.
(a simple screen with an American flag)
Posted by: riley | September 8, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Palin fought corruption.
Obama up to his neck in it via the Daley Machine in Chicago.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 8, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Samantha….you are absolutely great and your posts always make me smile (or laugh). Your perspective are greatly appreciated as you are a resident of Illinois, and best know this guy’s dirty politics and lack of accomplishments. Hillary should keep repeating “hell hath no fury like a woman scorned”…..she was scorched by her own party, and I swear….as long as her ballot is secret….she too, will vote McCain/Palin….same as Bill and Chelsea.
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I think it is quite demeaning to send women out to fight with women. Its stupid and offensive. “Cat fights” are not necessary and its dumb to ask Clinton to aggressively attack Palin considering she is not the VP pick.
What exactly is Biden’s job?
Posted by: Joan | September 8, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
The BBC reported 5 days ago about money that was destined for Obama here in the United States. Guess where it was coming from? Nigeria. What part of illegal donations don’t our overseas friends understand? Or for the matter doesn’t Obama realize he can’t take overseas donations? We do know Obama doesn’t understand federal election laws when it comes to financing a campaign.
The story begins with a very expensive fund raiser dinner by most standards. This dinner cost $21,000 for an eight seat table. Fortunately the money never reached the USA. The money was raised to influence relatives of native Nigerians to vote for Obama by running advertisements.
The money was seized by some very astute Nigerians.
Nigerian anti-graft investigators have seized money raised by the head of the Nigerian Stock Exchange to support US presidential candidate Barack Obama.
The money will be returned to the individuals in Nigeria that attended the soiree according to The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Sandra S,
Dems, Please note that some of the posters on this board, particularly the ones that continue to throw GIGO at every comment made, are Republican operatives who trawl the networks trying to spread chaos and doubt. That is their purpose in life.
—————————
You’ve made an accusation, NOW PROVE that me or any other poster whose opinion differs from yours is a party operative. You dems and your projection is absolutely laughable.
Again, prove your accusation or retract it.
Posted by: Dee | September 8, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Fox News’s Carl Cameron came up with a fascinating description of this first joint McCain/Palin TV ad, which I typed as he spoke:
It’s a great piece of political judo wherein you take the mantra, the message, the strength of your opponent and claim it as your own. Barack Obama has been on the campaign trail now for two years calling himself the agent of change, saying that he’s the person who can really effect serious reform in Washington.
Now you’ve got John McCain and Sarah Palin saying that they are the candidates of change, pointing to their experience and their resume — their actual work in government — as evidence of their ability to effect the change that Barack Obama says he hopes to bring. Pretty tough row to hoe when Barack Obama has spent so many hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising and campaign efforts calling himself the agent of change, but McCain and Palin believe they can wrestle it away from him in just these last 58 days.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Fox News’s Carl Cameron came up with a fascinating description of this first joint McCain/Palin TV ad, which I typed as he spoke:
It’s a great piece of political judo wherein you take the mantra, the message, the strength of your opponent and claim it as your own. Barack Obama has been on the campaign trail now for two years calling himself the agent of change, saying that he’s the person who can really effect serious reform in Washington.
Now you’ve got John McCain and Sarah Palin saying that they are the candidates of change, pointing to their experience and their resume — their actual work in government — as evidence of their ability to effect the change that Barack Obama says he hopes to bring. Pretty tough row to hoe when Barack Obama has spent so many hundreds of millions of dollars in advertising and campaign efforts calling himself the agent of change, but McCain and Palin believe they can wrestle it away from him in just these last 58 days.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Samantha, your posts always bring a smile to my face (or a chuckle). I appreciate your perspective as you are from Ill. and know best Obama’s crooked politics and lack of accomplishment. Thanks for always having the best posts.
Hill will remember being scorched by BO campaign and in the privacy of her booth on Nov. 4, will pull the lever for McCain/Palin too..as well as Bill and Chelsea.
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
By Cal Thomas:
You Can’t Fake Authenticity
What is it about Sarah Palin that has gotten the liberal media’s knickers in a twist? Why are they criticizing, even mocking, everything from her hair to her faith?
She is exactly what the feminists claim to want and admire in women: strong, self-assured, a working mom, a political leader. But wait, she is a conservative Republican and because of that they hate her for displaying all of the aforementioned characteristics.
They are appalled that she would keep a Down Syndrome child when she could have aborted him. They are outraged when she speaks of God as if she knows Him, when their only acquaintance with the name is as a curse word, followed by “damn.” They are even disgusted that she has five children, as they think one (or two if you are Obama) is enough.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
McCain has had to return over $7,500,000 in donations including money bundled by all around scumbag Harry Sargeant.
How come McCain gets so much dirty money?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 8, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
By Andrea Tantaros
Oprah’s Mind: Closed for Business?
For a woman who used to encourage millions of females to “find their spirit” Oprah Winfrey has certainly lost hers. The queen of daytime gab fests refuses to have Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin as a guest on her program–at least not before Election Day. We all know she’s backing Barack Obama but why wouldn’t she interview the first female Republican ever to be nominated as vice president? Isn’t this the same woman who lauds women who do it all? “A career, babies, a husband, adversity…you go girl!” You don’t need to be Dr. Phil to diagnose O’s prideful, blatant favoritism. The icon used to give away cars. Now she gives away her obvious bias.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Dee at 2:58…I agree with you. The only race baiter has been Obama and his campaign, oh and Rev. Wright the biggest racist in this comedy. What they all did to Bill and Hill, I’d get sick, need surgery, be needed out of the country for family reasons, if I was Hill.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Saw Hillary stumping today. Doesn’t
she look…..so………yesterday?!
Posted by: grizzly bare | September 8, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
McCain picks a hard core conservative to be his running mate, boy, there’s a change for a Republican. Now he’s claiming to be uniter not a divider, haven’t heard that one before.
Posted by: Joe | September 8, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Hmmm – Obama’s biggest supporter (Winfrey) seems to have a couple of racist bones in her body.
Obama and Oprah — two peas in a pod!
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Uniter not a divider, guess that makes him a decider. McSame with Cheese.
I’ve had enough.
Republican for Obama!
Posted by: Joe | September 8, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Come on Joe — at least be honest. You’ve been spouting pro-Obama nonsense here for quite a while.
Just like Obama people – trying to make something appear real that just isn’t so.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Samantha: you and I are on the same wavelength. The only way that Obama might be able to regain lost ground is to get out the Hillary-hater vote at this point. See, now he can blame his loss on Hillary by saying that she didn’t do his dirty work for him by attacking Palin so he wouldn’t seem sexist (if he had to do it all by himself). Obama didn’t need the 18 million Hillary supporters, right Michelle Obama? Why did WE all see this coming, but the DNC did not?
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
The Democratic donkey has become a jackass.
Posted by: marylou | September 8, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Virginia Harris
Too bad Obama is trying everything he can do to crumble those gains. His disdain and trickery have shown conclusively that he doesn’t give a damned about woman’s rights beyond getting their vote.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Some of us believe that HRC will take on Palin the same way she and Bill Clinton supported Obama at the convention: Half heartedly.
We hope, along with the Clinton’s, that Hillary will have another shot in 4 years.
This election we are voting Palin-McCain.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 8, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Yes, Obama should now reach across the aisle to attract the Republican Hillary haters and other misogynists who are not pleased that a woman is on the GOP ticket. He’d probably attract more misogynists and sexists than Hillary supporters at this point.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Virginia Harris…I did subscribe weeks ago still waiting for a e.mail. love the concept.
1 2 4 9 8
Posted by: i am so I can!!!! | September 8, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Please Hillary do not do this to your supporters. DO NOT let Obama set us one against the other like a street gang of mud wrestling women. There is nothing Obama’s kind would like better than dissolving us into that kind of theater and low life entertainment! Sisters unite- there are more of us then there are of them- let us beat them at their own game – Get you brothers – husbands and fathers to defend you against the street fighter who wants to put us out on the streets like mud wrestlers to fight among ourslves without dignity.
You won’t catch me backing Obama. No Obama, no way and no how. I see Clinton v. Palin in 2012 after McCain/Palin slaughter St. Obama/Biden in 2008. Thanks Obama, DNC and MSM for handing the Presidency to the Republicans again this year with your chosen one.
Posted by: Mary O'Bryan | September 8, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Something they forgot to teach Obama at Harvard (one of the 7 deadly sins):
Pride is excessive belief in one’s own abilities. It has been called the sin from which all others arise. Pride is also known as Vanity.
Obama will lose the White House for the Dems because he could not “lower” himself to putting Hillary on the ticket where everyone outside of the Obama squad sphere knew she belonged. Pride folks, plain and simple. Obama’s pride will lose this election on behalf of all Democrats. Do not blame Hillary or her supporters–blame Obama’s failure to recognize how his pride and arrogance would cause his downfall. This is not a new story–read any Greek tragedies Obama?
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Obama self-destructs in his interview with O’Reilley.
Watch it tonight on FOX.
8:00 PM Eastern
Posted by: USVet | September 8, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
54% of our population female. 50% voters vote emotion not policy…who they FEEL DESERVES the keys to the WH. That’s good math for McCain/Biden.
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
oops….McCain/Palin
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
But, hey it was an easy mistake as McCain wants to appoint Reps and DEMS to his cabinet….and he and Biden have a close friendship that goes back 33 years…love that McCain has no ego…just wants the best and the brightest, bipartisan leadership! He is the REAL UNIFIER.
Posted by: Debra | September 8, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
To Hillary supporters…it’s payback time :D. McCain 2008, Clinton 2012
Posted by: fromHILLtoMAC | September 8, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
USVet
I saw Obama & O’Riley on Bill’s teaser last week. Obama took an awfully long time to respond – probably trying to remember what he’s for.
I wasn’t impressed with his performance during the interview at all. In the end, he really didn’t say anything significant — just generalities.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
The presumption is that Obama has only lost ground with “uneducated” woman. This is so funny to me–having a law degree of my own. I guess nobody could believe that educated women could get behind McCain/Palin. I do vote because of the issues, but this time the biggest issue is representation. I don’t think Susan B. Anthony would’ve wanted my vote to have been treated as a non-factor in the VP selection process (as it clearly was). Educated women get this and are willing to vote for the principle that each woman’s vote should matter. Gee, I get to choose a man who demonstrated sexism in choosing his running mate or a man who didn’t. If you think I’m an uneducated country bumpkin because this issue matters to me most (yes, more than the economy), then you just don’t get it. Women fought for me to have the right to vote because my vote should matter. A vote for Obama is a vote for the marginalization of all Democratic women voters (or at least the millions who supported Hillary).
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
To Hillary supporters…it’s payback time :D. McCain 2008, Clinton 2012
Posted by: fromHILLtoMAC | Sep 8, 2008 4:13:24 PM
===============
If you’re doing it for some sort of payback Hill will never win. People don’t forget.
Posted by: never | September 8, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“People don’t forget”
———————-
That’s why we never forget how Obama treated Hillary supporters!
Posted by: fromHILLtoMAC | September 8, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
You said:
“If you’re doing it for some sort of payback Hill will never win. People don’t forget”.
Hillary asked us all to turn the other cheek. She did, but I can’t. She is a much bigger person than I and should not be blamed for my decision not to support Obama. When we women voters got hit with the Biden pick and news that Hillary was not EVEN vetted, some of us realized that we could not bring ourselves to support Obama. You can’t force me (as a lifelong Democrat) to like someone who has proven in one false move that he is a coward and sexist. Ask yourself–if you were presented with a great leader, with all of the right credentials and experience, –could you vote for him? Now how about if you were Jewish or African-American? Don’t tell me the Biden decision wasn’t sexist–we know, we saw, we will not forget–no matter how much Hillary or Bill tell us that we should like Obama anyway. It’s just not possible–sorry.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Dusky,
I have a graduate degree too. They say the BOTS are the most educated people but they appear to be sophomoric to me. Obama has a resume like tracing paper and a reputation of being consistent at one thing only—-running for another office other than the one he holds. I have seen this pattern in people who feel entitled, especially men with little qualification, who are unfairly advanced above women in jobs . I can’t believe that the DNC allowed it to happen to Hillary. The Obama message of Change is to divide and conquer. Obama does not care about equal anything for women.
A grave miscalculation on Obama’s part was finding refuge in the media- Big mistake-and not expecting another person to steal his spotlight. Throw in the race baiters like Donna Brazille and his stammerings w/o teleprompter and you can see that he possesses glaring weaknesses. Too bad he put himself on the pedestal as the Chosen One and promised to walk on water. That is a hole he dug for himself. Obama is narcissistic. BOTS are following him into fairytale land only when they get to the forest the house in the woods will be a shack. Just like it is for those of us in Illinois.
I find McCain/Palin to be more sincere and down to earth.
The Obamabots are hypocritical. Today Biden says of Palin “She made a few good speeches”
An I am like come on which sounds EXACTLY like the beginnings of media stardom for your running mate OBAMA.
I love the Newsweek cover with Palin on it PALINTOLOGY I love it and everyone is buying her glasses. Obama is in trouble. But maybe he will learn how Hillary felt.
Posted by: Samantha | September 8, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Hillary is doing what she committed herself to do. She doesn’t have to do any more than that and Obama does not expect her to do more than that. Why does everyone think Obama is lost without Hillary going after Palin? Hillary has already given Palin a clear message with that one line, “NO WAY, NO HOW, NO MCCAIN, NO PALIN.” These words alone make it loud and clear to Palin that it would be best that Palin not use Hillary’s words, nor use Hillary as an icon to advance the Republican agenda.
Posted by: Donna | September 8, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“A grave miscalculation on Obama’s part was finding refuge in the media- Big mistake-and not expecting another person to steal his spotlight”
I agree. With Matthews and Olbermann being demoted, Obama has 2 less BOTS on the air.
Posted by: fromHILLtoMAC | September 8, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Samantha–yes–”maybe he will learn how Hillary felt” when his media image loses to a new media image. Maybe Obama should buy some Palin glasses. I think that there are many, many highly educated women who refuse to drink the koolaid this time. And I wish Palin all the best in a spot that should have been Hillary’s (just looking at credentials, experience). I am still grateful that Hillary’s campaign opened our eyes to the extent of rampant sexism in our own party. Shame, shame. SHE was an important voice in the dialogue re: the future of this country.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
It is not Hillary Clinton’s duty to take on Palin. It is Obama and Biden’s role. This does not change the fact the most of the 18,000,000 Hillary Voters will vote for McCain. This is why we will not help Hillary Clinton pay off her $20 million debt unless she first drops Obama.
Posted by: Dr Hubert, Lt Col, USAF, Retired (2005) | September 8, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Hillary is amazing! Obama is a phony! It is frightening how the marketing of Obama made him so popular even though he had ZERO EXPERIENCE.
I’m so glad America is seeing him for what he is…all talk and fake presidential seals.
Palin/McCain 08
Posted by: Mike | September 8, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
First Obama and his followers trash HRC and now they’re begging for her to rescue the shallow one’s failing campaign. Poetic justice at the least.
And, very funny. I’m laughing my head off.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Why does anyone need to “Take on Palin?” That would only make this a campaign about personalities and totally ignore the issues, which is exactly what the Republicans (Karl Rover) wants. He did the same thing when Bush ran and look what we got. When the issues are discussed, Obama/Biden win hands down. McCain admits he doesn’t know that much about the economy and “it’s the economy stupid.” Palin doesn’t know much about the eoncomy either, at least when it comes to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Posted by: algwriter | September 8, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Why does anyone need to “Take on Palin?” That would only make this a campaign about personalities and totally ignore the issues, which is exactly what the Republicans (Karl Rover) wants. He did the same thing when Bush ran and look what we got. When the issues are discussed, Obama/Biden win hands down. McCain admits he doesn’t know that much about the economy and “it’s the economy stupid.” Palin doesn’t know much about the eoncomy either, at least when it comes to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Posted by: algwriter | September 8, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
I hope that voters who embrace Hillary Clinton’s position on social issues as well as domestic and foreign policy, but who shun Obama, appreciate that Sarah Pailin is cut from the same ideological cloth as Pat Buchanan and the evangelical right. Is that who you want a heartbeat away from the Presidency and from the authority to shape the future composition of the Supreme Court?
Posted by: JimW | September 8, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
obama won’t win, and he has only his own horrendous judgment andnaive supporters to blame……of course, they will try to blame someone, anyone else for their self-inflicted failure, but that will only exacerbate their inability to understand what went wrong…..
Posted by: chris | September 8, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
That’s why we never forget how Obama treated Hillary supporters!
Posted by: fromHILLtoMAC | Sep 8, 2008 4:34:33 PM
Yes, it works both ways.
Posted by: never | September 8, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Obama: “PLEEZE BUY MY PRODUCT”.
Posted by: dl | September 8, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
JimW: The Dems always brings up Roe v. Wade as a scare tactic, just like the Repubs bring up 9/11. Stop already. We know that even with the Roberts court, Roe has not been overturned. The Senate would not confirm a religious fanatic judge anyway. Finally, even without Roe, the states have the power to keep abortion safe and legal. Enough already–we’re not stupid. Why don’t you try another “key: issue like gay marriage. Oh, that’s right, neither Obama nor McCain supports gay marriage–just civil unions. Here’s a new issue for you–sexism in politics: how the democrats lost the 2008 election because the man could not share the stage and spotlight with her pantsuits. Sexism will decide this election. Obama’s only hope is to pander to the Republican sexist/misogynist Hillary haters who are angry that a hockey mom is now on the GOP ticket.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
You know, if you all, Hillary supporters, are concerned about the issues, then vote with the person who is concern about the same issues. It is not about the person who’s running, it’s about what the person who’s running will do for you/us! Don’t you get it? Hey, get real or don’t vote. I definitely don’t want you messing up my chances to get the issues I’m concerned about addressed. See Ya!
Posted by: Loretta | September 8, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Once again we hear from all the Republicans disguised as Hillary supporters. The Republicans don’t give a rat’s behind about Hillary. But they are bringing up how poor Hillary was treated because they think Hillary supporters are going to vote for a right-wing ticket. I don’t think true Hillary supporters would do that, unless all they care about is the gender of their candidate. Don’t take your eye off the ball people. We’ve got an eight-year mess to clean up. Hillary said it best today: You don’t call on the iceberg to fix the titanic.
Posted by: Phil | September 8, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Do you really think that all women care about is whether you have the proper reproductive equipment? Obama stands for pay equity, reproductive rights and choice, health insurance for all that supports birth control as a choice, the end to domestic violence and economic security for our families. Just having a double x chomosome is not enough to win progressive women over and it is demeaning to women to think that it might be.
Posted by: Bonnie | September 8, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Bonnie: I’m sorry–our point here is that Obama did not stand for equal treatment of women when he chose Biden over Hillary. How can you ignore that? I wanted to like Obama, but his decsion to ice out Hillary supporters is what made me think I could not vote Dem for the 1st time in my life. What good is a stance on an issue if your leaders dod not walk the talk? NOBODY (and believe me, I have been asking) has been able to explain to me why Biden got the gig over Hillary (except for affirmative action for old white entrenched D.C. insiders who supported the Iraq war??) You tell me how you swalloed the Biden pick. Not only did it go against everything Obama claimed he stood for, it slapped the Hillary supporters real good. Brilliant and a shameful move (shame on Obama). If he did not think that we mattered, he should not win this election.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 8, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
if hillary attacked palin she would be history –and fast—-not a doubt in the world.
Posted by: rodney | September 8, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Palin serves the purpose of distracting us from the issues that the Republicans don’t want to address, because they have made them worse over the last eight years: global warming; foreclosure crisis; health care; rising unemployment rates; Katrina; poverty rates that are highest for women and children; exorbitant gas prices; failing schools; and a trillion dollar war. If we can argue about Palin and whether or not the media is being mean to her and her family, we will forget that John McCain is a seventy-two year old man with recurring melanoma who voted with Bush 90% of the time and voted against every proposal to support solar and wind energy development for the last decade. Obama won the nomination fair and square. He didn’t nominate Hillary to be his vice-president because he knew it would be difficult to be chief executive with Bill and Hillary in the White House. Members of McCain’s own party admit Palin was a campaign decision, not a governing decision. In other words, he put his political ambitions above what is best for the nation. Obama might have won more easily with HIllary on the ticket, but he was concerned about governing, not just winning. In other words, he put his country above his political ambitions. Hillary is right not to take on Palin in order to avoid contributing to distractions from the issues. Go HIllary!!!
Posted by: VP | September 8, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Hillary is so amazing that I know she will be able to do her democratic duty and at the same time not really help Obama very much.
He is such a phony. I do not know how many people will recall but during the primaries Obama was always “stealing” the ideas of Hillary. This is why during one of the debates she used the Xerox comment. (Unfortunately, the audience did not take the “joke” seriously.)
McCain/Palin 2008 – Hillary 2012
NoObama
Posted by: Phyllis/ PA | September 8, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Hillary would need Obama supporters in 2012, just like the 2008 primary. She won’t get them if Obama loses in November.
Posted by: Sallie | September 9, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
I am a big Hillary supporter, but I’m an even bigger supporter of policies that will save this country from distruction. I truly believe this is a make or break election. We are simply out of time. Voting principles instead of personalities will deliver this election to Obama. If not, it will be McCain, and make no mistake — we willt hen get more Bush — especially on the crushing critical issue of planetary enviornmental degredation and global security with oil. We are in trouble. As a country and a planet. We don’t have the luxury of grief. Let’s move forward with the Obama/Biden team that will mean change — smart, strong measured change. Our world depends on it, and once again, women will decide.
Posted by: donzi | September 9, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Obama, Biden, and Clinton ask women to make their decision for president based on “THE ISSUES” as Hillary put it. Now if you are BLACK, they infer that its OK to vote for the “HISTORIC TICKET” Just another example of a DOUBLE STANDARD if you ask me. The Democrats hold blacks back in what amounts to a “Sharecropper Arrangement” For the Black Vote. Once a black becomes successful, the Democrats drop them like a hot potato. Another double standard as applied by the Democrats
Posted by: GeraldD | September 9, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am
Hillary had 18 million votes and yet Obama thought she wasn’t the best pick for the Democratic ticket.
Of course, he was just following the DNC’s guideline of SELECTING Obama rather than honoring the real votes of their constituents.
I think they will both (Obama and the DNC) regret their mistreatment of WOMEN when they lose in the GE. Hopefully, it will make them more aware of women in the 2012 election.
Posted by: Sami | September 9, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am
If Obama loses the election, it might just be because of the Clintons!
I was a Hillary supporter before her and Bill’s mudslinging to Obama.
They have done such damage that it was impossible for Obama to sell that Hillary really wants Obama.
Nice Job Hillary, your over the top selfishness might have sunk your party.
Posted by: Ben Sona | September 9, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
The country is over. I am looking to get a foreign passport and move on. Doesn’t matter who wins. Because We The People are hypnotized and divided and refuse to take back our government and public dialogue.
Posted by: Thomas Brooks | September 11, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
Hillary should tell the dope with hope to stuff it. If he had picked her they would have won, now, with Palin on the team, McCain will probably take the White House.
Posted by: Rob | September 11, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
You know I am really getting tired of these type of exchanges. If you know anyone that has a son or daughter in Iraq you can not vote for a Republican ticket. We have to bring our troops home, and have Iraq take responsibility for their own country. If people really cared for our troops you would not vote Republican. Look at the bigger picture. Woman should vote as mothers who have children that could possibly go to war in a McCain administration (he probably will reinstate the draft). I just don’t get it.
Posted by: Robin | September 11, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
The clintons really surprised me in this election. To all hillary supporters, hillary will never get to be president in 2012 or ever. They need the black vote to win and they get all the blame.
Posted by: No hillary in 2012 from black voters | September 20, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm