By Lindsey Ellerson

Sep 2, 2008 12:54pm

How Palin is Playing in the Supermarket Aisles

Rick Klein, from ABC’s The Note, reports: Let’s say you don’t read The New York Times or The Washington Post (or The Note, for that matter). Let’s say you don’t follow the big political blogs and you’re not obsessed with every turn of the screw of this fascinating presidential race. Let’s say, instead, like millions of working-class Americans, you get your “news” on the political race from the supermarket aisle. Let’s say you’re — I don’t know, a “hockey mom” — and you’re intrigued by this Sarah Palin person you’ve been hearing so much about since Friday. So you’re shopping this week — and what do you see on the cover of US Weekly? That esteemed journalistic institution is taking it right to John McCain’s running mate — with a hard-hitting piece that details the “scandal” involving her daughter’s pregnancy. “BABIES, LIES & SCANDAL,” screams the headline on the cover, with a picture of a smiling Palin holding her fifth child, 4-month-old Trig. Inside is a collection of Palin lowlights — from her daughter’s now well-known pregnancy; to Internet rumors that the governor pretended to be pregnant to cover for her daughter; to “troopergate”; to her onetime support for the “bridge to nowhere”; to a radio appearance where she giggled while shock jocks called a political rival a “bitch” and a “cancer.” “Within hours of McCain’s surprise introduction of the little-known, charismatic mother of five as his running mate, the scandals began to emerge as quickly as flies at a Labor Day picnic,” Mara Reinstein writes for the magazine. “While putting to rest one scandal, Palin appeared to have opened another of even greater significance. Staunchly antiabortion (even in cases of rape) and opposed to sex-education classes (she believes in abstinence instruction for teens), ques­tions began to arise about not just her judg­ment, but that of McCain’s as well,” Reinstein writes. It should be noted that there is no new reporting here that I can discern — just a greatest hits from what’s out there. But this, to me, is the clearest evidence yet that the McCain-Palin campaign is losing the battle over Palin’s image. US Weekly readers are the voters her selection was designed to attract. There’s not much to like in this early take — and not much to indicate that the next round will be much better.

User Comments

Palin claims to be all about “family”, while she leaves her 5 month old down syndrome baby at home with her “mature” daughters. I guess Palin’s teenagers will be fine taking care of both babies while their mom is campaigning. That is until the younger one gets knocked up.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

If McCaint is going to claim ‘experience’ (time in Washington), then the Harvard Law grad and Chicago University Law professor, Barack Obama, SHOULD CLAIM INTELLIGENCE, because time alone does cannot mean useful and effective experience!
Intelligence multiply by Time equals Meaningful Experience (ME)!
And Obama CLEARLY has more ME, with his demonstration of better judgment on Iraq, better judgment on a VP pick, better judgment in taking down the well oiled Clinton Machine, etc!
Moreover, Obama is a Natural Born Leader, as witnessed by his multitudes of highly INTELLIGENT supporters, who are motivated to change America and change the world view of America!

Posted by: Patriot | September 2, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

This clearly shows a lack of judgement on McCain’s part. Is America ready for another bumbling President?

Posted by: JoeReed007 | September 2, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

The Grand Old Party picked a loser with McCain and now has to deal with the consequences of his first important decision–his Veep.
Picking new candidates for both jobs would be smart.
Most Americans are very conservative in their behaviour.
The whole McCain campaign has been squalid.
Cannot wait for the October Surprise on Palin.

Posted by: susan | September 2, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

This womens fall is McCains fault. In order to win he never vetted a person who was not prepared for this.

Posted by: jen | September 2, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Ahahahaha!!! I love this!

Posted by: Jeremy | September 2, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

This is just horrible! What a boneheaded choice. Thanks Mclame for giving us the election!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Can we spell DEVASTATING?

Posted by: Kevin | September 2, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

My mother-in-law is a republican. On Friday she was over the moon about this pick. Today she is hoping McCain drops her from the ticket. Enough said.

Posted by: Kevin | September 2, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Maccain,
Do you want to offer this woman to America? And you still claim you are the only patriot in this country?
first I was angry with you,
Now I feel sorry for you.
Maccain: Power First, Country Second

Posted by: zen | September 2, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

This is really sad for the Repugs. I almost feel sorry for them but for the fact that if the situation were reversed, and this was say, Biden’s daughter, they would be coming at us with both barrels, unlike what Obama has suggested that we keep families out of the campaign. Obama has got class, that’s for sure.

Posted by: geecee | September 2, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

This has to be a made for t.v. movie, but now it’s called ‘legally brunette’, this has to be the biggest joke ever…

Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

I am an Obama supporter, but somehow this has become painful to watch. This has become worse than Rev. Wright.

Posted by: Kevin | September 2, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

ANYONE WHO GETS THEIR NEWS FROM US WEEKLY IS A COMPLETE UNEDUCATED MORON OH THATS RIGHT THATS HALF OF AMERICA.

Posted by: natale from mass. | September 2, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

A mom who chose to give a speech and fly in a plane instead of getting immediate medical care for her disabled baby when her water broke; chose to leave that 5-month old disabled baby at home while she further her career; and chose to leave her knocked-up teen-age daughter at home while she furthers her career…
What kind of family values are those?

Posted by: Que | September 2, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

QUE GROW UP SOME OF US MOTHERS CAN DO IT ALL. APPARENTLY YOU CANT BY THE WAY SHE DOES HAVE A HUSBAND UNLESS YOU THINK WOMEN ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT CAN HANDLE RAISING A CHILD? THEN YOU WOULD BE MISTAKEN.

Posted by: natale from mass. | September 2, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Palin is being dragged through the mud, after only 5 days. Yet, Obama, on the campaign for almost 2 years, is not fully vetted. There is SO much about his past that we don’t know. Why are the vultures digging into his past with as much zeal?
As usual, the sexism reigns. People jump to conclusions and attack the female Palin immediately like savages, but her much more inexperienced male opponent Obama, with so much suspicious and dangerous aspects of his past, gets off scot free. Why isn’t the press asking the exact same questions of Obama?
Not only that, any attempt at investigating into Obama’s past is met with calls of race card.
How did Americans come to this? We should be ashamed.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 2, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Does this scream of sexism to anyone? Obama did cocaine a trug tafficed by criminal gangs when Palin’s husband was arrested, not convicted of DUI. Her teenaged daughter is pregnant, so what???? She fired one of her commissioners after offering him another job he turned down, well within the job description of the governor. Nothing of much interest at all. Nothing to compare to a hate filled church with ties to Lybia for 20 years, an indicted felon financing your house and your campaigns, a close friend and associate who is an unrepentent terrorist. Nothing even close! It’s absurd sexism and I hope woomen take that thought to the ballot box.

Posted by: s.b. | September 2, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I’m still unsure if Sarah Palin is campaigning for public office, or auditioning for a role in “Juno-2-Baby Got Bump “

Posted by: Leprkin | September 2, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

I really feel sorry for her daughter. Bad enough to be young and pregnant, but under the scrutiny of national (and world) media as well? I don’t think I would have done that to my 17-year-old daughter. Nor could I leave when I just had a DS baby in April. I consider myself a feminist, but I do put family first. I agree with the poster who said this is painful to watch.

Posted by: obamamama | September 2, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

wow, I hope that all of the Female CEO’s that handle billions of Dollars everyday and the Surgeons that handles peoples lives every day and the Lawyers who gets up everyday and defends those on the brink of the death penality or life altering situations, would just quit and go hame and take care of thier children and let the men run the country, is this where we are at? just making sure, because I guess they don’t have fathers and husbands who are responsible enough to pick up the slack.

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

The cover photo is gold. or don’t you remember the story about 60 minutes trying to do a hatchet job on Reagan?

Posted by: geevill | September 2, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

“Let’s say, instead, like millions of working-class Americans, you get your “news” on the political race from the supermarket aisle’
OMG! How condescending is that. Someone send this to Rush.

Posted by: geevill | September 2, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Yes I dn’t read the NYt’s there ad revenue and subscribtions are down almost 80&, editors are resigning at the LA times, a major sports reporter walked off the job at the Chicago sun time, He said Newspapers are dead!!!!! how come we don’t hear these things on ABC. http://www.drudgereport.com and http://www.newsbusters.org, now thats where the news is

Posted by: hilly-billy | September 2, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

I’m sorry, but a woman with 5 kids, some of whom are still very young, is not ready to be a full time Vice President.
What happens if there is an “emergency” between BOTH one of the kids and the nation at the same time? She loses both ways. If she takes care of the nation emergency, she becomes an unfit mother. If she takes care of the kids first, the nation could be put in a war.
Mr. McCain, quit worrying about your personal ego and start worrying about the good of the nation and get a VP who has kids out of diapers.

Posted by: LOfromMO | September 2, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Thanks Rick, we always knew the MSMS thinks bitter working-class Americans clinging to guns and religion are getting their news from the supermarket aisle. (how else would we know Inexperienced VP candidate John Edwards had an affair and child while his wife dies of cancer)

Posted by: geevill | September 2, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Wow A mother standing by her daughter during a media driven social life…..She is running for VP. What a about a Presidential Candidate who best friends are criminal but I forgot so are the owners of ABC news… No wonder they aren’t interested in finding out about the man who is running for president? No stories about everything Obama has done, thats right he doesn’t listen to his spiritual guide (Wright) haha….News from ABC is as bad as CBS and NBC. I quit listening to the others several years ago. Now ABC too….. Report all the news not just the parts your criminal owners tell you …. Some journalists you are NOT!

Posted by: kay | September 2, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Sexism rears its ugly head again. They got away with it with Hillary and now they are doing worse to Palin. Absolutely horrible. Poor little feeble minded women can’t take care of their families and work, how dare they aspire to public office. We should be home barefoot and pregnant, serving our man. Some of you people better drag your sexist attitudes out of the 1800′s and join the real world.

Posted by: samhiguchi | September 2, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Choosing Palin is one of the most shameful decisions McCain could have ever done to the political process and to the GOP. Having her name on the ticket is an insult to all Americans regardless of party. Is McCain actually TRYING to lose? I never expected him to commit political suicide. But he is doing it. How sad for the GOP.

Posted by: Tracy Christian | September 2, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

LOfromMO-please go back in your dark age hole, did you forget that this woman has a husband, are you insane, should every working woman with 3,4 or 5 children stop working and go home and take care of their kids? women do it each and everyday and their kids are fine, they do it everyday and have been doing it, even the ones that don’t work but stay home and run the house, they still make the decisions each and every day. what are you saying?

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

first of all, lofrommo, how come you are not asking the same question of Obama, with two young children? Michelle has already said that Barack is only home on weekends. Are you going to call him a rotten father? Wow do you assume that women must raise their children first, and men are expected to run the country?
It’s attitudes like that that will keep women in the back of the bus.
You notice that the SAME people who are attacking Palin, are the ones who attacked Hillary? Same issues…..they attack Hillary personally, with sexist comments, why she isn’t there for Chelsea, why she tolerated her husband’s cheating, etc. HIllary is MUCH more experienced than Obama, yet they all attack her, and let the inexperienced opponent run scot free. Sound familiar?
Yet, no one attacked Obama personally that way. So, it is not really about party, it is about GENDER.
As they say, weak men are threatened by a strong woman.
“A respectable woman should not support or advance a party that ignores her”.
— Susan B. Anthony
Americans should be ashamed.
Is this progress?

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 2, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Palin is a disgrace, the least capable person to ever be nominated by any party, the whole world is laughing at the GOP and its soap operas. This is what 8 years of Bush McCain leaves for you America, a white trash soap opera instead of serious political substance. Anyone can see now that Obama and Biden are the only serious choice and the only hope left for the USA to regain its position as a leader in the world.

Posted by: Linda Wheeler | September 2, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

If anything, the Palin selection demonstrated that relying on emotional vectoring to steer the election is unreliable. Notice that in one day all of the effort to build up Obama leading to the Big Spectacle was undone and the poles switched to the other side. So I wouldn’t count on that cover to change the outcomes. Expect a lot more of that. Obama is insulated because… well.. umm… because he is…. ummm…a …. lawyer.
But the press only runs with what sells.
The experience drum is loose at the rims. If there are two issues that will cause people to think, they will be:
1. EXTREME conservatism. It scares people when you tell them their children will be taught nonsense science and be unable to take the job from an Indian who was taught combinatorics are age ten while you were allowing your children to be told that considering all sides of a question means seriously considering the world was created 5000 years ago.
2. The Sorceror’s Apprentice: at the end of every election cycle we are left with endorphin-addicts who fed on the hate generated by sites like Daily KOS. They have to do something with that energy so the question is can the winner actually redirect that destructive force to positive means or is he merely the Sorceror’s Apprentice.
Goals vs leadership. Bill Clinton had it exactly right.

Posted by: len | September 2, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I am amazed at the support for Palin. I am a mother of an autistic child and 2 other children. There is no way I could have a full time job and meet the needs of my son and family. She does not have the experience and I do not feel her priorities are where they need to be.

Posted by: L Holland | September 2, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

I love to watch right wingers flush there morals down the tolet in order to prop up a dying party! Why to stand your ground right wingers! Going to have to change our definition of “family values”! Hippocrate bastards.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

THANK YOU JOHN MCCAIN FOR HAVING THE COURAGE TO PUT A WOMAN ON THE REPUBLICAN TICKET! IF OBAMA HAD BEEN BRAVE, INSTEAD OF THE COWARD HE IS, HE WOULD OF PICKED HILLARY.

Posted by: Linda SAT | September 2, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

So when draft-dodger Joe Biden (5 deferrals and then a supposed “childhood ashthma” diagnosis) wife and child died, he decided to go to work at the senate despite having young ORPHANS at home. Where is the scrutiny?
Let us just say that ABCNEWS and Jake Tapper are worse than US magazine. They are bottom dwelling parasites pretending to be serious. May you rot in hell.
The liberal left and the MSM have never been so low. Let us bring back Reverend Wright to remind people of who the first term senator from Chicago listened to for 20 years.

Posted by: Karen | September 2, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“Palin claims to be all about “family”, while she leaves her 5 month old down syndrome baby at home with her “mature” daughters” Debra you are disgustingly sexist! Why is it the woman’s job to take care of the children when the man can get off his butt and fricking help out!!! Women have a right to distinguished career and be all that they can be while their husbands get up and help out!!!

Posted by: Jeff | September 2, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

“It’s absurd sexism and I hope woomen take that thought to the ballot box.” Amen. Enough of this crap from the Democrat party. Why do Democrats always eat their own when it suits them? What a bunch of sexist and bigoted hypocrites! VOTE NO TO BIGOTED OBAMA SUPPORTERS!!

Posted by: Jeff | September 2, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I wonder if the baby is MClame’s?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

“Sexism rears its ugly head again. They got away with it with Hillary and now they are doing worse to Palin. Absolutely horrible. Poor little feeble minded women can’t take care of their families and work”
__________________________
Obviously, she hadn’t been taking care of her family too well. Its a fact, not sexism. How do I know? Her teenager is knocked-up!
BTW, Palin has a “pastor problem” that’s about to explode into the media too. I love it!

Posted by: Jase from Texas | September 2, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

“I consider myself a feminist, but I do put family first. ” You aren’t a feminist, obamamama. Feminism is about giving women choice and celebrating their choice in life. Feminism is the radical ideal of equality with men. You obviously know nothing about feminism. Do you even read prominent feminist writers such as Mary Ann Doane, Adrienne Rich, Teresa De Lauretis, Laura Mulvey or Teresa Goddu?

Posted by: Jeff | September 2, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

decentAmerican “You notice that the SAME people who are attacking Palin, are the ones who attacked Hillary? ”
Is this the current Republican talking point then? I loved it when Representative Bachman tried using that line on Larry King against James Carville last night. Carville was Senator Clinton’s bulldog who only recently let go of gnawing on Obama’s leg to take a quick swipe at Palin. It really showed how flat out false that talking point is. Many of the people skeptical of Palin’s “experience” are Clinton supporters somewhat aghast that McCain thinks she is anywhere near as suitable for the office as Senator Clinton .

Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Would anyone in the right mind propose on the first date?
This is what McCain has done by picking Palin.
GOP never should have nominated McCain in the first place!

Posted by: Peace | September 2, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

GMAB…more smears from another liberal leaning rag.
and who believes that middle America believes the stuff in these rags any more than they do the ENQUIRER.
The liberal feeding frenzy is pathetic to watch….one can only assume that all thectivity is because the left is scared and faliling out.
At least the candidate himself shows some measure of decorum and says to lay off the kids.

Posted by: few | September 2, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

So here are your choices:
You have a strong black man and a strong black women who are rasing two beutiful girls.
They have sound judgment in there VP pick.
On the other hand.
You have a crusty old white man who’s cheated on his first wife several times. Who picks a VP with a drunk for a husband and five kids she aperrantly needs to spend more time with. And is preaching abstance and no safe sex. (WE know how that policy worked).
And if Obama had a teen daughter who was having premarital sex and got pregnant you right wingers would crucify him with it. And you know it!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Sarah Palin has a high approval rating in Alaska because she’s been a pro-active governor. This is why she’s now the VP on mccains ticket. I cant wait to hear her speech, i reckon its going to get people talking about her again and not trashing her family.

Posted by: Louise | September 2, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Palins daughter is a teenage whore!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

What kind of role model is this for our teenage daughters?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

What kind of role model is this for our teenage daughters?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

MOMS OF AMERICA,
I need help with this ‘woman thing’ a “leader’s” CREDIBILITY, NOT HER FAMILY! lol
1. You are 44 years old and pregnant (RISKY).
2. Your ‘water broke’ PREMATURELY; and you are leaking amniotic fluid.
3. You would jump on a NON-MEDICAL plane for 8 HOURS and a 4 thousand miles trip, in order to give birth … TO A PREMIE AT THAT?
Is the above;
a) Insane
b) reckless
c) bad judgment
d) an out and out lie, or
e) all of the above? lol
The unbelievable Sarah Pollen story.

Posted by: Patriot | September 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Love the double standard, go ahead media, treat her like Hillary and you will hand the election to McCain on a platter.
And where is the story that Obama’s love connection Larry Sinclair was arrested in Delaware by none other than Joe Biden’s son, Beau Biden.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Louise: “Sarah Palin has a high approval rating in Alaska because she’s been a pro-active governor.”
What, specifically, has she done with her 18 months in office, beyond putting the state jet up for sale on Ebay and giving away (or proposing to at least) a bit extra from the Permanent Fund that is awash in oil royalty money?

Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Looks like the abstinence only thing didn’t work out that well. So are we to believe that any of her other ideas will work out any better?

Posted by: rigatoni | September 2, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Palin is a horrible parent and she should spend more time at home!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

s.b.
There’s no sexism honey! The press had been all through Obama’s trash and so has the Kings of Trash, The National Enquirer. You idiots are just mad because while there’s nothing to those Obama stories, the press is now happy to turn it’s attention to this train wreck Sarah Palin and they’re not going to stop until they peel off all of her scabs! While you stupid McCain supporters are buying the GOP talking points regard this pregnancy story, the rest of us are not buying this! She’s a hypocrite!

Posted by: kim | September 2, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

And comparing Palin to Clinton is like comparing a High school drop out to a Astrophysicist

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Wow,
I am just disgusted with most of the comments in this blog. I have never heard so many judgemental people. This 17 year old is not running for vice president, Palin is. I think the media and some of you really should be ashamed of your selves.
Ya… I can really see this election bringing people together.
WHAT A JOKE!!!

Posted by: luv2tvl | September 2, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Since women only earn 72% of what men earn, will she forgo 28% of her VP salary because she’s a woman? As a Woman and an undecided, I am not impressed. Olympia Snow, Kay BaileyHutchison would have been 1000% better. Her 5 children being reaised by their father just shows you where their values lie— the son is going to Iraq, the daughter is knocked up. Where was this father? Both of these parents don’t show much in the way of Family Values. I doubt I will be voting for a Republican ticket.

Posted by: blackholeofcalcutta | September 2, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Joe, you are a disgusting human being and represent exactly what Obama and his supporters are about. Absolutely disgusting. Obama is losing this election and its becuase of his followers who do nothing but say childish trash.
Its the fact that Sarah took on the republican party to weed out the corruption, sold the jet because she said she didnt need it and the money was needed for better things, took on the oil companies, created legislation. She is proactive in her short career as governor and she will be proactive in her long career as VP.
Tell me who the bitter folks clinging to guns and religion are voting for now. I can almost bet is Mccain/Palin.

Posted by: Louise | September 2, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Up by 8 and going. Weed out corruption like loybing for a bridge to no were and lying about it. Or firing people who don’t support your campain? Yea that’s “strong leadership”. LMAO!! Right wing hippocrite!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

hilly-billy
Aha drudge? Isn’t he the one who brought us Monica’s blue stained dress? This Alaskan trash fits right in!

Posted by: bo | September 2, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

It should be changed from the GOP to the HOP. Hippocrite OLD Party. LMAO!!! Now there is CHANGE I can believe in! LMAO!!!!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

geevill |
At least Edward’s girlfriend is of age!
Ha Ha Ha!

Posted by: bo | September 2, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

While I agree that candidates dependent children should be off limits for discussion, I am forced to ask, where are this woman’s priorities? She has a five month old Down child, a pregnant 17 year old, and 3 other children who probably need a real mother’s emotional support. There is no real replacement for a mother’s love and it is critical to good emotional development. I am disturbed to think that her ambitions usurp the needs of her children.

Posted by: DaveM | September 2, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Thanks, Mclame! This is the most fun I’ve had in awhile!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

McCain is toast! He is going through a late life crisis. Sorry for him, his age should stay home enjoy the rest of his life.
Palin should go home take care of her children. Her children need her more than American people do.
I am so pleased the way Obama is handing this. He shows us the true leader of this country. He is the one we need!
Obama/Biden 2008

Posted by: Lin | September 2, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

I love to watch right wingers flush there morals down the tolet in order to prop up a dying party! Why to stand your ground right wingers! Going to have to change our definition of “family values”! Hippocrate bastards.
Posted by: Joe
Your, so right Joe! They keep praising her for keeping the baby but what about the sin she comitted in order to get pregnanat in the first place? We’re not supposed to notice that she performed these acts with someone who is not her husband? Do they think we’re stupid?

Posted by: lise | September 2, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

black hole … well, you could look at it the other way.
1) On average, women (as a group) make 72% of what men make (as a group) because they tend to make different career choices and step away from working or work part-time to have families. Less experience = less $. By that calculation, Obama’s pay should be cut too.
2) Also, why not peel off the “support our troops” sticker from your car before you suggest that a parent failed somehow b/c the child joined the military.
3) which part bothers you most – the teenage sex or the pregnancy or the fact that her mother’s political views are that abortion shouldn’t be allowed? And how does any of those indicate parental failure any more than your parents’ inability to raise a child capable of critical thinking or compassion?

Posted by: DVS | September 2, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Or the POP. The Pandering Ol’ Party! I can come up with these all day! LMAO!!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

I guess we’re too stupid to see the roundabout way the press is playing this one. We don’t report trash but we report the people who report trash. Come on keep showing your true colors.
Double standard, took a year for the Edward’s scandal to make it here but Sarah Palin’s, what five days.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Well, at least the GOP is able to get some press now.

Posted by: Deidra | September 2, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What republicans say with this choice:
It’s ok to do it as long as you are a republican. But if your not and your daughter has premarital sex your going to hell!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Democrats and liberals are shamefully sexist and have no class. They slandered and demonized Hillary, and now they are trying to tear apart Palin. I am no longer a Democrat.

Posted by: Jane | September 2, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

If you put Palin here in California or New York, she would probally have lowest approval rating in the history.
It is just simple and clear: She is not the one we need for this country.

Posted by: Lin | September 2, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

To All:I received this from a friend whose former classmate is from Alaska and thought it should be passed around. xo WendyDear Classmates – As an Alaskan, I am writing to give all of you some information on Sarah Palin, Senator McCain’s choice for VP. As an Alaska voter, I know more than most of you about her and, frankly, I am horrified that he picked her. The most accurate description of her is red neck. Her husband works in the oil fields of Prudhoe Bay and races snow mobiles. She is a life time member of the NRA and has worked tirelessly to allow indiscriminate hunting of wildlife in Alaska, particularly wolves and bears. She has spent millions of Alaska state dollars on aerial hunting of these predators from helicopters and airplanes, dollars that should have been spent, for example, on Alaska’s failing school system. We have the lowest rate of high school graduation in the country. Not all of you may think aerial predator hunting is so bad, but how anyone (other than Alaska wolf-haters, of which there are many, most without teeth) could think this use of funds is appropriate is beyond me. If you want to know more about the aerial hunting travesty, let me know and I will send some links to informative web sites. (insert from calimary: see The World Wildlife Fund, Defenders of Wildlife, and other worthy organizations)She has been a strong supporter of increased use of fossil fuels, yet the McCain campaign has the nerve to say she has “green” policies. The only thing green about Sarah Palin is her lack of experience. She has consistently supported drilling in ANWR, use of coal-burning power plants (as I write this, a new coal plant is being built in her home town of Wasilla), strip mining, and almost anything else that will unnecessarily exploit the diminishing resources of Alaska and destroy its environment. Prior to her one year as governor of Alaska, she was mayor of Wasilla, a small red neck town outside Anchorage. The average maximum education level of parents of junior high school kids in Wasilla is 10th grade. Unfortunately, I have to go to Wasilla every week to get groceries and other supplies, so I have continual contact with the people who put Palin in office in the first place. I know what I’m talking about. These people don’t have a concept of the world around them or of the serious issues facing the US. Furthermore, they don’t care. So long as they can go out and hunt their moose every fall, kill wolves and bears and drive their snow mobiles and ATVs through every corner of the wilderness, they’re happy. I wish I were exaggerating. Sarah Palin is currently involved in a political corruption scandal. She fired an individual in law enforcement here because she didn’t like how he treated one of her relatives during a divorce. The man’s performance and ability weren’t considered; it was a totally personal firing and is currently under investigation. While the issue isn’t close to the scandal of Ted Steven’s corruption, it shows that Palin isn’t “squeaky clean” and causes me to think there ay be more issues that could come to light. Clearly McCain doesn’t care. When you line Palin up with Biden, the comparison would be laughable if it weren’t so serious.Sarah Palin knows nothing of economics (admittedly a weak area for McCain), or of international affairs, knows nothing of national government, Social Security, unemployment, health care systems – you name it. The idea of her meeting with heads of foreign governments around the world truly frightens me. In an increasingly dangerous world, with the economy in shambles in the US, Sarah Palin is uniquely UNqualified to be vice president. John McCain is not a young man. Should something happen to him such that the vice president had to step in, it would destroy our country and possibly the world to have someone as inexperienced and inappropriate as Sarah Palin. The choice of Palin is a cheap shot by McCain to try to get Hillary supporters to vote for him. when McCain introduced her today, Palin had the nerve to compare herself with Hillary and Geraldine Ferraro. Sarah Palin, you are no Hillary Clinton. To those of you who, like me, supported Hillary and were upset that she did not get the nomination, please don’t think that Sarah Palin is a worthy substitute. If you supported Hillary, regardless of what you think the media and the democratic party may have done to undermine her campaign, the person to support now is Obama, not Sarah Palin. To those of you who are independent or undecided, don’t let the choice of Palin sway you in favor of McCain. Choosing her shows how unqualified McCain is to be president. To those of you who are conservative, I guess you have no choice for president. But please try to see how the poor choice of Palin tells us a great deal about McCain’s judgment. While the political posturing inherent in the choice of Palin is obvious, the more serious issue is the fact that the VP is, literally, a heartbeat away from the presidency. Sarah Palin is totally and unequivocally unqualified to be vice president, let alone president. I know this is a lengthy and emotional email, but the stakes are high. I thought it might help for all of you, regardless of political affiliation, to know something about Palin from someone who has to live with her administration in Alaska on a daily basis. Jackie S

Posted by: LM | September 2, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

The most amazing thing is how people’s true colors start to show. Apparently for many Dems, protecting womens’ rights is about choosing to have an abortion, not about having a fulfilling career (or atleast not until your children are 18 or older). Right, sign me up for your “aging womens” movement right now – I’d love not to work, still be intellectually satisfied, know I’m serving my community, help support my family, and still be able to get a real career when the kids are all grown. Even at minimum wage, the 20 years of pay your program will provide me (and every other woman you’re choosing to judge) can certainly be raised by putting more tax burdens on the “rich” and on corporations (aka employers).

Posted by: LLM | September 2, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

the racism and sexism obama’s supporters have consistently displayed against his opponents and their supporters only supports the reality that he is not the leader they want others to believe he is….

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

decentAmerican “You notice that the SAME people who are attacking Palin, are the ones who attacked Hillary? ”
Is this the current Republican talking point then? I loved it when Representative Bachman tried using that line on Larry King against James Carville last night. Carville was Senator Clinton’s bulldog who only recently let go of gnawing on Obama’s leg to take a quick swipe at Palin. It really showed how flat out false that talking point is. Many of the people skeptical of Palin’s “experience” are Clinton supporters somewhat aghast that McCain thinks she is anywhere near as suitable for the office as Senator Clinton .
JHW539,
I completely agree with your comments. The talking points from the right is to yell “sexism” at every instance if someone is not saying all glowing and positive things about Gov. Palin. The far right has used the term “sexism” more in the last 48 hours than they have ever used it in the last 30 years combined trying to defend this absurd pick by McCain.
I feared as an Obama supporter that McCain was going to pick Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson! Now, that is a person whose credentials or experience could never be criticized even if you do not agree with her political views. Unbelievable that with only 2 months left that McCain would pick a VP that has not been on the national stage and then turn around and not really vet this person. Insanity, considering McCain has had several cancer scares.

Posted by: Newswatcher | September 2, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

McCain knew how to expose the sexism and double standards in this country and he put it out right there on the table for everyone to see, just in case you missed it during the primaries. Mothers should stay home but it’s ok if fathers don’t. A woman with a family shouldn’t work. A man isn’t capable of taking care of an infant.
If she works she is wrong, if she doesn’t she is wrong. This is 2008, welcome to the life that millions of women face everyday.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

LM….if all that is true about palin, then America is facing a tough choice between the redneck chick from alaska and an old naval officer with a maverick reputation and a charmin hypocrite with horrendous judgment and his “change” contradiction of a veteran insider and attack dog……..

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

it is very sad that so many have chosen to compromise the best interests of our children, our troops and America by not supporting the only candidate capable of being the best President for such loved ones: Senator Hillary Clinton….

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Debra: Don’t try to play the goody goody girl when you know that girls younger than 17 are getting pregnant everyday and maybe one of your friend’s is pregnant already. Try watching the Maury show and listen to how many young girls don’t even know who the father is because they have been with so many men. I am sure you definately heard about that or know girls like that.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Hey I think women can raise kids and have a job. But it’s aparrent Palin isn’t very good at doing it

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Chelsey wasn’t a pregnant teen

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Debra, have no fear, Governor Palin’s youngest son is being cared for by his father, who is a stay at home Dad. Get your facts before jumping to conclusions.

Posted by: AspireRNC | September 2, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

what’s worse? having your 17 year old become pregnant, or subjecting your younger, impressionable children to the hateful rantings of a pastor of a church you only joined and abandoned to further your political career?

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Yes, the woman’s daughter is pregnant. How many of you can say you didn’t have sex as a teenager, or that you KNOW your children didn’t have sex as a teenager? Does that make you or your parents unfit? At least she didn’t get an abortion. Our sympathies should be with her, not venom.
But the more disturbing part is this – many of our presidents have had young children and no one questioned their ability to lead for it – because they were MEN. Saying she needs to stay home is extremely sexist and unfair to all women.
Someone asked what would happen if there were two emergencies at the same time – a child and the country. Obama has young children – what if one of them has an emergency while the nation has one, too. It applies to EVERYONE with young children, and yet, you’ve chosen to villianize her b/c she’s a mother, and her child made a mistake. One that anyone’s could make. Give me a break.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

only Senator Clinton is capable of being the best President that our children, our troops and America deserve and need right now at this critical moment in our history…..it is on your conscience if you have decided to act against the best interests of such loved ones by supporting a lesser candidate (mccain/obama) to take on the daunting tasks to be faced by the next President…

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

wow, obama’s lemmings are sexist against a female opponent……how novel….

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Newswatcher: Who cares about vetting. No senator, Mayor or Governor should be vetted. They are not filling out an application for a job. Get real. Also I don’t care about her daughter being pregnant at age 17 when there are young girls the ages of 14 thru 17 haveing babies, throwing them in the garbage, trying to drown them in the toilet or leaving them in a field as one had been found recently. People just want something to say because they don’t have anything to do and didn’t accomplish anything in their life and never will. Comments made about Palin’s daughter are from people that no doubt know several girls that are having babies at a young age. They can’t play games with me because I am well aware of the fact of what their friends do.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Chris – isn’t refreshing to have a hard choice? Voting should matter, instead of rubber stamping the “party of choice”. There’s pros/cons for both tickets – clearminded voters can consider their priorities/make a decision. As always, caveat emptor.

Posted by: LM | September 2, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

T h i s is not about babies! THIS IS ABOUT BEING CONNED INTO GOING INTO IRAQ FOR WMD’s….Our Republican President LIED TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. THIS IS ABOUT THE FAILURE TO ACT AFTER 5 DAYS AFTER KATRINA. THIS IS ABOUT THE ECONOMY STUPID – AND BUSH/CHENEY TIES TO BIG OIL!!! And they are trying to get elected AGAIN! Rove, Black, Graham…all the same players.

Posted by: not Again | September 2, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Michelle: You said the words that I said. Those that comment about it absolutely know or have friends that are pregnant now maybe younger than Bristol. I watch the Maury show and see what is going on with young girls ages 13 thru 17 and don’t know who the father is. One girl have 6 men come on the show and they were not the father. The one’t making the comments are playing innocent and dumb but they don’t fool me. Most of them already had sex and I am will to take bets on it.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

I agree Michelle, double standard that women deal with everyday.
They are bringing up questions they would never even think to question in a man.
They are creating standards they would never hold a man up to. NEVER, NEVER, NEVER. And they don’t even see the hypocrisy.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

So if your daughter is a whore and your in the office all the time you are a responsable parent?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Not Again: I am sorry to tell you that McCain is not responsible for the war. If you insist that he voted for the war so did Biden. What about that? Yes, Bush lied about it but the majority of senato’s voted for it so you cannot single out one person only. Hillary voted for it. Obama was against it but wasn’t at the senate for the voting. It was only word of mouth from him. I cannot believe the public is so dumb to believe what he says when it is nothing but a pack of lies. Obama is good at that. He is a good sincerity liar and its people like you that eat it up. I am well aware of what he is doing.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

it is so disturbing that the MSM how harshly vet Palin vs. how they did with Obama.
Obama’s church did not come out of any major news channel until the clips surfaced on YouTub.
His Rezko link only came out after Hillary challenged him about his slum lord.
His Ayrs connection wasn’t raised until before the PA primary. The reporters didn’t bother to check if Obama really stands as he claims as a reformer, which I think is bogus — he is everything molded by the corrupt Chicago machine. Yet these reporters dug their head to see if there is anything that Palin’s reformer image can be discreditted.
His extreme abortion view was not revealed until he lied and then had to admit that he lied.
There is so much more out there about Obama that the MSM does not want to report on: his affordable housing projects, his support for status-quo, his other questionable associates. But every one is so concerned about Palin’s 17-year daughter and his husband’s DUI 24 years ago.

Posted by: amy | September 2, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Joe writes – But if your not (republican) and your daughter has premarital sex your going to hell!….Here you are providing yet another example of how the Dem campaign has devalued politics into false finger-pointing and misrepresentations. Republicans did not claim there is a double-standard, but you did. Stop with the divisive sexism tactics, wake up and start to work on the issues and solutions!

Posted by: AspireRNC | September 2, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

I thought it was.. If your in the office all the time and your daughter is a straight A student, who is not pregnant, you are a responsable parent.
That goes male or female by the way befor you right wingers start shouting sexist at me.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Joe – are you saying that any woman that had sex before marriage is a whore b/c I can bet that’s a whole lot of women. Which means you never had sex before you were married, because, being equal – that makes you a whore. In case you didn’t read the whole story – she’s pregnant by her boyfriend and getting married. I certainly hope your daughter (if you have one) never disappoints you b/c that would make you a horrible parent – or would that be your wife’s fault?

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Typical repuke response. Sit there a judge everyone then when someone does it to you you say STOP BEING SEXIST AND DIVISIVE! After you a holes have been for years. AND I AM NOT BEING SEXIST!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Joe: Are you trying to say that you are not having sex with your girlfriend? If your married bets are on you had sex first. This is not the days of the 30′s40′s50′s most young girls today want that sex and so do the guys. Who are you kidding? I know better.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Personally I don’t see it as an issue. But when your political party grabs the title of Moral leadership and the puts forth tis canidate….
Thats the deffinition of hipocracy!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

So if the shoe was on the other foot…
What would the repubs be doing to Obama right now?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Here’s McCain’s joke. Unbelievable.
“Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?
Because her father is Janet Reno.”
Listen to the hypocrite Republicans howl about family values and laugh, laugh, laugh.

Posted by: Eric | September 2, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

I don’t care what no one says, Mitt Romney should have been VP. Now once again John McCain has sold us Republican voters out for a horrible pick for VP. THIS YEAR IS ABOUT THE ECONEMY STUPID! John I’m a Republican and you sir are no Republican you are a traitor to my party and deserve to lose. Many Republicans have decided they will not allow McCain to hijack our party and sell us out for a few trashy socialist women Hillary Clinton Votes. We are the party of values and reason and you have threatened to destroy our party by picking Palin who is a unknown and has accomplished nothing that would sugest she was a good pick for VP. Palin’s family morals and family values are in question and if we allow this woman to stay on this ticket then you have lost this race already because we will not vote for you. Either you put Mitt Romney on this ticket or we will allow the Democrats to take the White House. If you dont beleive us, look at the poll numbers that are comming out after his pick of Palin .Choose wisely my friend! Romney/2012

Posted by: Orlando B. Fremont Ohio | September 2, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

I know…. they would be saying this guy can’t raise his own kids how is he going to lead the country. And it would just get worse from there..
Welcome to the big show miss alaska!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

Really? I thought the definition of hypocrisy was when you disavow the church you’ve attended and supported for 20 years b/c it turns out your pastor’s views and comments are insane -but only after national coverage and disclosure. 20 years is a long time to disavow.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

AspireRNC: You are correct. I just answered Joe myself and I know that he’s aware of the fact that most young girls are having sex today or are pregnant like Bristol. Obama said the right thing by not getting involved because he has two daughters. No parent knows what they son or daughter is doing when they walk out that door. The mother of that young man didn’t know he was going to shoot student’s on campus. Joe should wake up and get a life.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

This is what bothers me about her. While on the campaign trail, how do you truly take care of your family. I am all for strong women but I am also for strong, smart women who will not neglect their family for their careers. She is young and if she has aspirations to get on the national scene, she has time for that after she had taken care of her family. How can she truly serve America when she has stuff going on in her family that has to be constantly on her mind. We spend a lot of our time thinking about our family when things are stable so I know how it can be when unhappy stuff is going on. Do she plan to run around the country with her kids or will her daughter have to take care of her siblings. You know people can say well we would not say this to a man and that is because the Mother is expected to be there and nuture the family. It has to be hard to hold your baby and two Blackberry.

Posted by: Wendy | September 2, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

WOw Michelle an old talkin point! Awsome so it only hipocritical if your a democrat.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

but JOE — Ref “if it was Obama’s daughter” … – you’d agree w/the republicans that the girl was a whore and the parent a failure, so what’s the problem?

Posted by: CMS | September 2, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Joe,So if your daughter is a whore and your in the office all the time you are a responsable parent?
I guess she could march her down to the abortion clinic so she wouldn’t be punished with a child. Or I guess she could make her face up to her responsablities as a 17 year old who made a choice and now has to live with the consequences. Or she could have used birth control so she could be a whore as you say all that she wanted without ever having to deal with a pregnancy. Or she could have locked her in her room so she couldn’t act like she was a normal 17 year old interested in sex.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Joe,So if your daughter is a whore and your in the office all the time you are a responsable parent?
I guess she could march her down to the abortion clinic so she wouldn’t be punished with a child. Or I guess she could make her face up to her responsiblities as a 17 year old who made a choice and now has to live with the consequences. Or she could have used birth control so she could be a whore as you say all that she wanted without ever having to deal with a pregnancy. Or she could have locked her in her room so she couldn’t act like she was a normal 17 year old interested in sex.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Well yea alot have premarital sex.. I know that but obviously she is a horrible parent because she didn’t talk with here child about safe sex or the risks of having sex. Probably that good republican abstance talk at work in that family! LMAO!!!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Joe: And she has been a big show. He raised 10 million dollars after he chose her for VP. And I bet she could give you a good argument. Don’t think that she isn’t a match for Biden. I would like to hear him debate her. She didn’t get elected mayor or governor because she was dumb she got it because she was smart and knew how to run Alaska and clean up the mess. And don’t look for that to happen if Obama gets elected. Look for a bigger mess.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Joe – I hate to break it to you at this stage, but neither condoms nor the pill nor any other form of pharmaceutical birth control is 100%. I even have a friend who got pregnant after her husband’s vasectomy.
So parents – have all the talks you want, but remember to tell your kids – the only way to make sure you don’t get pregnant is to not have sex.

Posted by: CMS | September 2, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Exsactly pennvoter! Lots of choices! But what about the radical movment that Miss Alaska was invoved in? Drop out of the US and join OPEC? She hates america!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Joe: How dumb are you? At 17 year old what is there to tell. Even at 15 girls know the facts of life and pregnancy. She isn’t a child and at 15 your should know better. Where have you been. Girls are getting pregnant at 13 and 14. Don’t play dumb like you don’t know and don’t try to play innocent. You are well aware of what’s going on today and I am sure you had sex with a 16 or 17 year old girl at one time if not younger.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

Joe – She has not been hypocritical. You obviously don’t know the meaning of the word – she’s against abortion and her daughter didn’t have an abortion. I would bet that she preached abstinance at home, but heavens, her teenage daughter chose not to listen, what a rare, rare thing. So she must be the worst mother in the world. Of course, that means every other parent of a teenager who doesn’t listen and who makes a mistake is a horrible parent, too. Or is the parent who preaches no drugs a hypocrite b/c thier child drinks and does drugs without their knowledge or consent? Wake up to the real world.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

I’d like to hear from Palin’s pastor.

Posted by: obamamama | September 2, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

What a shame and disgrace. McCain is a bitter and angry man.He really thinks that the election belong to him on WHITE principles only.Palin is being exploited by her own Party. This is the work of a deeply disturbed Mccain.He feels that Americans owe him for his heroism and POW nightmare. He is saying to the world If I can’t win then I will belittle the entire political process by deverting people from the Substantive issues in our politics.Clever move Mccain but i am HIP to your sinister mind-set

Posted by: Trish Garrett | September 2, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

CMS: Young girls today want that sex. It has been going on for a long time but Joe is a solid democrat and he is trying to do his best to critize Bristol and Sarah but it doesn’t work because I can guarantee you has been around like most men today and he knows that no matter what you tell them they will do what they want outside. Joe is playing dumb and innocent but don’t buy it. He is an Obama fan.

Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 2, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

She is a very bad parent then the plane ride all this crap. here daughter got pregnant because her mom is never home!You right wingers have lost it not the election but your minds! And she wants Alaska to drop out of our Union! She hates america!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Joe, how do you know any of that?
Now that I am 46 there are a lot of things my mom told me that I wish I would’ve listened to, but I didn’t. That doesn’t mean she didn’t tell me. That doesn’t mean I didn’t know but there is being told and there is learning from experience and judging from my two year old daughter, somethings you just have to learn on your own, no matter how much I wish this wasn’t so and I could keep her from all of it.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

How naive to think her daughter would not be savaged by the media when her pregnancy was apparent. What kind of mother would subject her daughter to that? For her daughter’s sake, Ms. Palin should have considered this and declined the offer of nomination. She is an example of grossly poor judgment and selfishness.

Posted by: RueDee | September 2, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

It’s obvious tabloid because her sister’s ex-husband is still a state trooper. HE WAS NEVER FIRED! He was suspended for 5 days for, tasering an 11 year old stepson, illegally shooting a moose, having alcoholic drinks in his patrol car and threatening Gov. Palin’s father.

Posted by: t. hill | September 2, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I hope her other daughter is getting good guidance from her drunk father.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Joe – I’m beginning to wonder if you’re really a republican posing as a disgusted democrat to make people more sympathetic to Palin. The rumor about Palin/AIP was started by a woman who admits she’s no McCain fan, group records show no mention of Palins as members, she has addressed the group both as mayor (when they came to town) and as governor … with no discussion as to whether she supports their cause or not.

Posted by: AIPno | September 2, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Don’t forget. US is owned by the same outfit that publishes Rolling Stone which is a huge Obama suporter.

Posted by: Hnak | September 2, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

This is just a great day. I never thought I could use right wing talking points againts there own canidate!LMAO!!! It’s like christmas!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

What was John McCain thinking? If there was any question about his disdain for women, this should have clinched it. I am stunned when I hear women gush about Palin because, “she is a hockey mom, just like me.” We are not electing the next homeroom mother, PTA chairwoman, or Sunday school teacher – this woman has the very real possibility of becoming the President of the United States. Does anyone think she is even remotely qualified for one of the most difficult and important jobs in the world? Undecided before, I am firmly for Obama now. This last stunt of McCain’s made my decision.

Posted by: Charles | September 2, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

AIP and Palin are in a secret pact to take alaska’s resorces over sea’s and sell them to the Russians!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

The Obamas have been traveling and campaigning for almost 2 years and they have 2 young daughters. I don’t recall anyone yelling about who’s putting them to bed or who’s helping them with their homework. A politician’s personal life is their own and it’s not our business.

Posted by: JJLove | September 2, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

RueDee – I don’t agree that Palin should turn down a job to spare her daughter embarrassment. She DID get pregnant, against whatever her parents said, and therefore needs to live with the consequenses. In her case – she knew her mother was in politics, and chose to do this anyway. Basically, no matter what action Palin did or did not take – you wouldn’t be happy. And please remember, she made this announcement b/c the ridiculous media started speculating that Trig was actually her daughter’s child and not hers. If anyone did ANY research at all, they would have found that down syndrome babies are more prevelant in mothers over 35. Her daughter’s actions do not impact her ability to do her job any more than any other candidate’s children do. And believe it or not – this treatment of her is going to backfire. Even Obama was smart enough not to comment on this – the media and the rest of you should follow his example.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

Charles, you left out mayor, business owner and governor of Alaska who has a pair to stand up to her own party when they are wrong. As a Hillary supporter, this is unlike Hillary I might add.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

What an awful, sexist article. I can’t believe the nature of so many misogynistic comments … and so many of the misogynists and sexists are women themselves, i.e. “Deb” poster #1
We may not agree with some of her politics, but to condemn her for seeking the VP and abandoning her family is awful. I wonder how you would react were someone to state that ‘Obama should know his place’.
If the latter statement is racist, then the former statement is sexist.
I disagreed with that liberal Fascism book because it din’t fit my worldview.
Then I saw what ‘Progressives’ did to Hillary and are doing to Sarah.
The scales have fallen from mine eyes.

Posted by: Livermoron | September 2, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Isn’t she affilited wih the IRA?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

DO NOT put Senator Hillary Clinton in the same sentence with
Sarah Palin
Notice the distance I put between their names? They are a zillion miles apart.
One is a professional fit for Presidency, and the other is….I’ll just stop right here.

Posted by: no comparison | September 2, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Joe- you have conveniently forgotten that Obama did drugs as a youth… which was illegal. So, Palin’s husband was arrested for DUI years ago – that doesn’t make him a drunk now anymore than Obama’s previous drug use makes him a junkie now. You are being ridiculous.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

uh….exactly what is it that she did to stand up against her own party?
And who did she stand up against?

Posted by: no comparison | September 2, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Michelle, I have to correct you on one point and also because I heard it said that Sarah Palin was irresponsible for choosing to keep a down’s syndrome child.
As a mother at 44 I was worried about Down’s, after doing research and as my doctor told, high risk doctor mind you, that since more and more women are postponing pregnancy they have begun to get a more accurate picture of the risks of having a Down’s child,and they are finding that the risks between older and younger women are nearly the same or possibly even higher in younger women.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

You all are just scared… This was a brilliant choice and there is no real scandal in her life. She is REAL…unlike the phony Obama who hides everything about himself. Palin has 8 years executive experience while Obama has NONE. He was merely a community activist/organizer. Big deal. Has he ever held a real job? Has he ever run a business? No. Obama isn’t even a legal citizen if you believe the Democrat from Pennsylvania who filed a suit charging that he never reclaimed his citizenship by the age of 23. Obama is the one who has scandals…not Palin. She is just a real human being and a reformer (the latter scares the dickens out of ya’ll!)

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

HRC=strong qualified woman awesome parent!
Sarah Palin=horrible parent unfit for Vp

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Pennsylvania voter – I will concede you have more information on this than I and withdraw that point. Thank you.
However, it’s still valid to point out that the media was ridiculous to try to say the baby was her daughter’s and she was covering it up.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Obama bounce is dwindling. People are watching the hypocricy. Do yourselves a favor, Obama supporters, take the high road. Don’t complain about the other party acting like they are superior while you are making comments that you didn’t like when the comments were made by them. Get it? If you don’t, then, you are a hypocrite.

Posted by: Kitty | September 2, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Boy, I can’t wait to see Hillary on the trail…Now THAT is a real woman.

Posted by: no comparison | September 2, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

She is a terrorist who wants to sell america’s resources to the Russians!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Michelle, she stood up against the former corrupt Republican administration in Alaska and cleaned out the corruption. Look it up…

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

JC- I’m in favor of her. I think you directed this at the wrong person. That was “no comparison”.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Yea Kitty I know. But I had to have fun with it for awhile and smeer this unfit canidate. With the repubs own talking points! BOOOOOOOHHHYYYAAAAA!!!! In your face repubs!!!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

Joe
You are a trolling moron who denigrates the very ideal of post-partisanship that Obama has tried to represent. Your points are either outright lies or complete distortions.
No comparison: Her record of standing up to her party and Big Oil is easy enough to find. Your very lack of curiosity about her positions indicates to me that you dismiss her because she is a woman and not worth the effort.
Sexist!!!!
The left has become the side of hate. I am distancing myself from it as fast as I can. I can’t believe that I had been so foolish.

Posted by: Livermoron | September 2, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

If it’s the economy stupid? And Mclame admits he doesn’t know squat about the economy, how does this help the ticket?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard, Joe. What are you smoking?? By the way, my sister got pregnant in her late 30s after having a tubal ligation and her husband had lost a testicle to cancer. She was also on birth control for other reasons. But they still had a miracle baby. So, anything is possible.
And just because her daughter got pregnant doesn’t mean she is a bad parent. What is wrong with you people?? You have to lie and make up stuff to feel better?

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

Thats as good as argument as me just calling you,
RACISIST!!
Livermom. So don’t pretend you know anything about me republican troll.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Newswatcher: Who cares about vetting. No senator, Mayor or Governor should be vetted. They are not filling out an application for a job. Get real. Also I don’t care about her daughter being pregnant at age 17 when there are young girls the ages of 14 thru 17 haveing babies, throwing them in the garbage, trying to drown them in the toilet or leaving them in a field as one had been found recently. People just want something to say because they don’t have anything to do and didn’t accomplish anything in their life and never will. Comments made about Palin’s daughter are from people that no doubt know several girls that are having babies at a young age. They can’t play games with me because I am well aware of the fact of what their friends do.
Marianne
Marianne,
I did not even mention her daughter’s pregnancy in my post. What bothers me about Palin is: 1) her and her husband’s membership in AIP as recently as 1994, an Alaskan group that strongly believes that the state of Alaska should succeed from the US, 2) Troopergate. Palin’s emails and phone records have now been obtained.By the way Palin has just hired an attorney to represent her on this matter as of yesterday, 3) Palin’s fellow Republican collegue in Alaska (an Alaskan Repbulican state senator) who was interviewed yesterday and stated that “Palin is not only not qualified to be VP, but that she is not even qualified to be mayor or governaor of Alaska,” and 4) Govenor Palin’s Mother-in-Law who stated over the weekend that she did not think that Sarah was qualified.
Ironic that for months the far right has lambasted and falsley attacked Senator Obama for not being a patriotic American. Now John McCain has turned around and nominated someone for his VP that believed as of 1994 that her state of Alaska should succeed the US. Talk about being unpatriotic……What a mess.
Marianne, people do still vett candidates for a reason; and now you should know why they do in case over the last 48 hours you have been out of the country.

Posted by: Newswatcher | September 2, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

Sorry, Michelle…I was too quick to react. My bad!
Hey Joe, Obama also admitted he knows nothing about economics. So what does that mean? At least Palin has had executive experience. Obama doesn’t know where/how he spent $49 million at Annenberg. That’s a lot of money to lose.

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

JC, soooo, she threw a rock and then hid her hands behind her back by joining the corrupt, with all of her support for Senator Stevens, who is being indicted for corrupt activities, by abusing her power, twice, by firing people unjustly, by lying about her saying “no thanks” to the bridge of nowhere when what she really did was keep the millions of taxpaying dollars..
Even Marge Simpson could have stood up to that corrupt Alaskan government, so what?

Posted by: no comparison | September 2, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

I post evidence of your Sexism, JC. Please post evidence of my racism.
Women deserve equality. Women will be equal when treated equally. Or do you lie about everyone?
It was done to Hillary and now it is being done to Sarah. Don’t aregue the issues, just smear, lie and hold her dowm.
Sexist pig!

Posted by: Livermoron | September 2, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

It is not hypocrisy. Republicans STRIVE for a moral backbone to this country. Because we are human, we make mistakes, and fail, but that doesn’t mean we should stop trying or that it is hypocritical to want it to be better. And to keep TRYING.
It’s better than the alternative – reward the mistakes through social programs or erase the mistakes and say it’s okay. It’s NOT okay to make excuses just because someone is poor, or doesn’t speak English, or is here illegally.
Yes, Palin’s daughter made a mistake – but she’s going to live with it and do the right thing, not take the easy way out.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Sorry, I meant Joe in my response to his sexist attack

Posted by: Livermoron | September 2, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Troopergate: a non-issue. One should be fired for threatening the life of someone else and hiding behind the badge to do so.
State Senator: Do you have a name? He is probably a friend and contemporary of those who were ousted out of office.
Mother-in-law??? Her husband’s mother? I haven’t heard that, but I certainly would like to look it up.
As far as I have heard, she was fully vetted when they chose her. Much more so than Obama whose birth certificate cannot be authenticated and whose citizenship may not be in order as he did not reaffirm it by the age of 23. He traveled to Pakistan when he was 20 on his Indonesian passport. There is no dual citizenship with Indonesia.

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Stop whining about sexism…unfortunately, it is here and it is not going away anytime soon, just like racism, something Obama has to deal with every day of his life, with a smile, because racists don’t like to be called out.
Just imagine if Sarah Palin were a black woman….Can you just smell the blend of racism and sexism brewing. Boy, she would definitely be out of the nomination by now….

Posted by: no comparison | September 2, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

You all are just scared… This was a brilliant choice and there is no real scandal in her life. She is REAL…unlike the phony Obama who hides everything about himself. Palin has 8 years executive experience while Obama has NONE. He was merely a community activist/organizer. Big deal. Has he ever held a real job? Has he ever run a business? No. Obama isn’t even a legal citizen if you believe the Democrat from Pennsylvania who filed a suit charging that he never reclaimed his citizenship by the age of 23. Obama is the one who has scandals…not Palin. She is just a real human being and a reformer (the latter scares the dickens out of ya’ll!)
JC
JC,
Barack Obama was born in the US. This story was researched and reported on the evening news a few weeks ago. The news reporters were able to even obtain a copy of Senator Obama’s US birth certificate and show it on the air…GAME UP!
Secondly, are you kidding me asking if Obama had ever held a real job? I guess being a constitutuinal law professor, being an Illinois state senator for sev eral years are apparently to you “not a real jobs.”

Posted by: Newswatcher | September 2, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I honestly don’t care about her daughter or her parenting skills. It’s obviuos this decision was made by Mclames “little” head.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

As an HR administrator, the firing of the state trooper was illegal. There is no way around it.

Posted by: no comparison | September 2, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

Like his comments about Iraq after 9/11 and his cheating on his first wife Mclames “judgment” doesn’t even come from his gut.. This pick proves it comes from a lower part of his body.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Joe- you really don’t expect anyone to take you seriously with all these stupid comments, do you? You have nothing more than horrendous name calling and crude insinuations – you are a perfect example of why I could never be a member of the same party as you. And I feel really bad for the rest of the Democrats – you are a horrible member to have.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Livermoron, thank you. You did what I did to poor Michelle…looked at the wrong poster. Oops.
The Obama-ites are just scared. That is why they are attacking her. He has many more skeletons in his closet and a heckuva lot more corrupt associates (the whole Cook County Political Machine)–including unrepentant terrorists (Bill and Bernadine). And it’s obvious that Obama has not been forthright about anything in his private life. Even if he had been, he is a socialist by policy alone. I like a constitutional democratic republic. I like capitalism. I hate centralized economies because they don’t work and destroy every nation that adopts them.
–signed, an economist!

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

No comparison – did you not get the memo? He wasn’t fired. She’s been accused of trying to have him fired, which has not been proven.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Just following the republican exsample of leadership and judgment and campaining. LMAO!!! You guys can’t handle it.. How do you defend Mc;ames adultary?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

I feel like throwing up when I read most of the posts here and at other similar sites. What a revolting collection of “human beings” we all are.

Posted by: Ashamed | September 2, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Don’t be so superficial by reading tabloid magizines and listening to drive by media, dig deeper.. it’s your country and it’s an important election. What were these nominees doing before the media was looking? Who are Obama’s true alliances when you and I aren’t looking: -Ayers, Dohrn, Wright,Rezko, Holder and Johnson. All policitians say what they think we want them to hear. vote smart.

Posted by: T | September 2, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Or his embezzlment which costs tax payers billions?

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

The vitriol from the left is just astonishing. If you believe that Governor Palin should step aside because she has an infant with Down Syndrome and a pregnant daughter, do you believe that Senator Biden should have stepped aside when his wife and daughter were killed in a car accident and left two little boys behind? Do you think that he should have declined to take office as a Senator and instead stayed home and cared for his boys? And btw, the state trooper was not fired. Get your facts straight.

Posted by: Joanne600 | September 2, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Joe- we don’t defend his adultery. Nor does he. He admits it was horrible and he’s sorry for it. It takes a big man to admit when he’s wrong and ask for foregiveness. And while I’m disappointed that it happened – if we chose our president based upon marital fidelity alone – there’s a lot of presidents that shouldn’t have been, and a lot of them were Democrats. Or have you forgotten that the last Democratic president was impeached for lying about his affair?

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

I don’t think people are saying a woman can’t go work while the husband shares/takes over looking after the kids.
But what does it say about her judgment when she has a 5 month old child with Downs Syndrome who will undoubtedly need more attention than a “normal” child?
That’s the real question.
And if your daughter was going to be giving birth, and since you were so happy she was keeping the child, wouldn’t you want to be with her through the period, as it is/will be a very trying and difficult time in her life?
Palin has been through it 5 times. She could be a great comfort for her daughter. But she’ll be on the campaign trail.

Posted by: pondering | September 2, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Not really…not like working in business. Anyone who isn’t afraid of audiences can lecture, Newswatcher. That is hardly the same as working in business and running an executive office. Besides, he hasn’t passed any legislation or done anything of significance. Where is that $49 million, by the way??
With regard to his birth certificate, it seems to have been altered. But even if it is his true unaltered(and certified) birth certificate, he was adopted by Soetoro when his mother married him. His school records even list him as Barry Soetoro and he used an Indonesian (not U.S.) passport to go to Pakistan in 1980. Philip Berg, a Democrat (very staunch Democrat who does not support any Republican causes), has filed suit against Obama for this. go to obamacrimes.com

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

I think my favorite wingnut comment was from the idiot who claimed Obama was losing this election while up by 9 points, surpassing the 50% barrier in some polls. I’m not sure why Republicans are always so uninformed or prone to lying but it’s entertaining to watch.

Posted by: Joe M. | September 2, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Better get used to SP, you’re going to be looking at her for the next 12 years.

Posted by: Glen Hull | September 2, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Sorry have to go out, I am sure this debate will continue. Nice chatting with you all.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 2, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Oh lord the “forged” birth certificate people are now out in force. Please, for the love of god, kill yourselves before you spread the disease.

Posted by: Joe M. | September 2, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Wow! I’ve heard of sacrificing for your children – but you are actually saying she shouldn’t be working in a powerful position because she has children. No man would be expected to do that.
And let’s face it – that pregnancy during her first term as governor probably wasn’t planned – but she kept the baby and luckily has a husband who is willing to stand behind her career.
Saying she belongs at home is a crime against all working women who have worked hard for what they have achieved.
I love my daughter, but I work full time – that does not make me a bad mother.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Troopergate: a non-issue. One should be fired for threatening the life of someone else and hiding behind the badge to do so.
State Senator: Do you have a name? He is probably a friend and contemporary of those who were ousted out of office.
Mother-in-law??? Her husband’s mother? I haven’t heard that, but I certainly would like to look it up.
As far as I have heard, she was fully vetted when they chose her. Much more so than Obama whose birth certificate cannot be authenticated and whose citizenship may not be in order as he did not reaffirm it by the age of 23. He traveled to Pakistan when he was 20 on his Indonesian passport. There is no dual citizenship with Indonesia.
JC
JC,
If Troopergate is a non-issue then why did the state hire a private lawyer for Gov. Palin to represent her in this matter? One of her employees stated in an interview that “Palin tried to force him to fire her former brother-in-law.”Why were Gov. Palin’s email and phone records pulled if there is no issue?
The Repbulican state senator was a female by the last name of Green, I believe. I read this on yesterday, I believe on the Anchorage Daily News website.
John McCain was actually the one not born in one of the 50 US states. He was born on a military base in the Panama Canal Zone. Source: wikipedia.org

Posted by: Newswatcher | September 2, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

This lady is hot!!!!

Posted by: YOYO | September 2, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

You didn’t even see the second half of the argument, did you. You just have to leave it at “the forged certificate”. Well, it might be and there is good evidence that it has bee altered, but even if it isn’t there is other information that works against him. Has he ever re-affirmed his citizenship by the age of 23? All of that stuff aside, he is still a hard left marxist. That is probably why you like him. But I say that if you don’t like freedom, capitalism, and a democratic republic, then you should find a socialist country to move to.

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Military bases are on US soil, regardles of what country they are in.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

This lady is hot!!!!

Posted by: YOYO | September 2, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

McCain is a citizen because he was born to U.S. Citizens in the military on assignment. No question about that.

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

State troopers should not threaten people’s lives and hide behind his badge. But what does that have to do with the “MOTHER-in-law” you mentioned?

Posted by: JC | September 2, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Anyone see the Mclame special? Talk about a silver spoon!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

By the way, I want to scream out to ABCNews.com: we do not care what Elisabeth Hasselback thinks! Stop posting daily videos from her stupid ass show on your home page. Bury them 20 pages back if you must. Are you on crack? Why would her blathering be significant to anyone or mean anything in any world? OF COURSE she’s in love with Sarah Palin. Good god ABC, they both put the big snooze on me and they’re both practically the same person.

Posted by: Hillary Rocks | September 2, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Lefties are so predictable they way they always refer to those who don’t agree with them as stupid. As for polls, well Rasmussen shows that Obama has 85% support from Democrats and McCain has 86% support from Republicans. Typically Republicans lose the presidency when the Republicans don’t get out and vote. I don’t think that’s anything we have to worry about in November. We’ll be out in full force to defeat the Marxist.

Posted by: Joanne600 | September 2, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

Time to go. Joe- I hope you’ll be less judgmental and a little more reasonable. Even if you hate republicans, that doesn’t make their opinions any less important than yours. Although – you didn’t really give reasoned opinions, you just lashed out with vulgarities and hypocrisy.

Posted by: Michelle | September 2, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Republicans are paying bloggers to fill the blog spaces. Attorneys and
McCain campaign people being sent to Alaska to “clean up” more of
Palin’s mess past and present. The Republicans are running around,
covering up, pushing false credentials and hyping their “fluff” ticket.
Governor Palin’s resume: ‘Fringe’ Alaskan Secessionist Party Member…
Almost Recalled As Mayor… Directed Fundraising For Indicted Senator
Ted Steven’s 527… Troopergate Scandal… Calls Iraq A War For Oil…
Admits She Hasn’t ‘Really Focused On Iraq ‘… Palin painted the current
war in Iraq as a messianic affair in which the United States could act
out the will of the Lord…Alaska National Guard General: Palin Plays No
Role In National Defense….was for bridge to nowhere before against
it…secured earmarks and pork for Alaska even though she is against and
is a maverick…calls Sen. Clinton a “whiner”, approval rating 65%, not
85% as told by Republicans when first announced as vp candidate.
“Enough!”

Posted by: ml_ramirez626 | September 2, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

What’s being lost in all of the back-and-forth is that the fundamental issue here is not what Palin’s done, it’s that choosing Palin shows abysmally poor planning and decision-making on the part of McCain.
He wants to be president–the one whose finger is “on the button”–but he picks a VP candidate based on the flimsiest of vetting and minimal direct interaction. In addition, the selection is made not because the candidate offers actual skills, but because it is politically expedient. (If McCain wanted an experienced female VP candidate, why not choose Snowe, Hutchinson, or Rell–or even Christie or Meg Whitman–instead?) Instead, McCain tries to pass of Palin as the MOST QUALIFIED VP candidate he could obtain. (Perhaps that’s true; perhaps the aforementioned women all told him to take a long walk off of a short pier.)
All in all, this whole process and the aftermath reeks of McCain being much too reckless and impulsive to be president in the 21st century.

Posted by: EWG | September 2, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Just like repubs!

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Ok. I have very little invested in this argument but after reading all the comments I have one thing to add:
Joe, for the love of all that’s Holy, LEARN TO FU*KING USE SPELL CHECK.
Do you have any idea how irritating it is to be lectured by someone who spells the word hypocrite no less than 5 different ways? The substance of your talking points are asinine but you can at least let people figure that out by reading what you’ve typed instead of what you mistyped.
Watching you misspell 8 words and then end with “LMAO!!!!!!!” makes me feel like I’m watching the third grader whose mom won’t let him take his Ritalin because she’s into ‘holistic’ medicine.
You must be the son of horrible horrible parents. lol (sorry, couldn’t resist)

Posted by: Tigger | September 2, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

What are Obama’s accomplishments? He was elected president of Harvard Law Review, but didn’t publish any articles. He didn’t take a fast track job at a big law firm which is fine and his choice, but what has he really done with his law degree other than work his way up through the Chicago Machine? Similarly he spent years as a “senior lecturer” of constitutional law, who was “regarded as a professor” or “served as a professor”. So in other words he didn’t publish as most professors do. He did manage to write two autobiographies before he was 47 though. Seems to me the top half of the Democratic ticket is a bit of an underachiever.

Posted by: Joanne600 | September 2, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

What are Obama’s accomplishments? He was elected president of Harvard Law Review, but didn’t publish any articles. He didn’t take a fast track job at a big law firm which is fine and his choice, but what has he really done with his law degree other than work his way up through the Chicago Machine? Similarly he spent years as a “senior lecturer” of constitutional law, who was “regarded as a professor” or “served as a professor”. So in other words he didn’t publish as most professors do. He did manage to write two autobiographies before he was 47 though. Seems to me the top half of the Democratic ticket is a bit of an underachiever.

Posted by: Joanne600 | September 2, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

what a bunch of hypocrites…the same a$$ wipes who bashed Hillary are having a field day with Palin. So any woman with children should just stay home, no management jobs for them, right? What about your precious Michelle?..I am sure she was putting in some hefty hours at the Chicago Hospital where she was making 300K+. I hope all this bashing backfires on Obama..please let it be so. Agism-okay, Sexism, okay, Racism…watch it sucka.

Posted by: BabsNJ | September 2, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Governor Palin should run despite her daughter’s mistake. Why would she want her daughter to be blamed for keeping her mom from running for Vice-President?

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

ps…for future reference, all of you geeks who refer to McCain as McLame, McSame, McShame, McBush etc etc , we will assume that you are all virgins. There is just no way could you come up with a good pickup line if you can’t even post a comment without one of your witty plays on McCain’s name.

Posted by: BabsNJ | September 2, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I don’t care about Palin and her issues….As an independent I think this election has “peeled back the onion” and exposed some seriously dark things in this country……..
(1) This is still a very very racist country…the blogs and right wing comments are scary. The exit polls in the primaries show that at least 25% of people voted based on race
(2) This is a very very sexist country. The type of attacks on Hilary Clinton, Michelle Obama and now Sarah Palin, show that we have a double standard. Hilary had comments about the way she dressed and laughed. THe right wing even dared to attack John edwards wife when his scandal broke…..saying she obviously was doing something wrong……
(3) We will discriminate based on age – Obama was too young, John Mccain was too old and all the other very demeaning comments about both candidates and their ages
(4) We say we separate church from state but why are the Pastors from all these candidates – Wright, Dobson, Hagee and Parsley taking center stage? Why is the evangelical movement influencing these elections…my last check we had hundreds of religions in America but yet this group is gaining increasingly dangerous power
(5) We have a growing trend of journalists and “Main stream Media” that refuse to be objective. The blogs are driving the politicians and media. No one cares if the info. out here in the blogs is correct. The Networks are lazy and taking info. from blogs and selling it to average Americans as news.
(6) Is there anything in the constitution that would allow us as voters to vito both nominations and select new qualified candidates to run the most powerful nation on earth? Is any one else scared about the future of this country?

Posted by: Kae | September 2, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Well now we know that sexism is more prevalent in America than racism. Why can a man have a wife and children and run for office and go on the campaign trail with his family, but if a woman did it she’s a “horrible” mother? I wonder how single women can work full time and still find time to raise their kids? Millions of women are put in similiar situations without help from the father of the children. Does that make a woman a bad mother or bad at her job? Palin’s husband co-parents with her.
To me, the situation Palin is in with an infant and pregnant daughter shows me that she is an average American who faces the same problems a lot of us have in our family. How she handles the situation is what matters.
Who wants an elitist who thinks she is better than the rest of us or out of touch with American familyin office?
Does anyone think badly of Biden for raising 2 sons as a single father after his wife died? He was a Senator at the time.

Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

Palin is the new Spears. Only thing which is missing is a DUI and panty less photo.

Posted by: sandy | September 2, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Just a question? Did US magazine do the same kind of story about all the Obama rumors/stories – keyword being rumors.
I won’t vote Republican, but I find this attack on Palin disgusting. Did US run a story about Larry Sinclair? Rezko, or dirty Chicago style politics. I don’t think so. Why then is it okay to go after Palin in this way?

Posted by: mhhunt | September 2, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Why don’t you guys just write
If they aren’t liberal…stay home.
It is really apparent how much hate you folks have. I hope you don’t go to church cause God don’t like ugly. Go read about Esther in the Bible…she is Esther and God is not going to be merciful to those who touch his anointed one…she kept her kids.

Posted by: Will Sasser | September 2, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

What about Rev Wright?
William Ayers?
Why won’t BO release his medical records?

Posted by: William Sass | September 2, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Had Barrack not been against Hillary we wouldn’t be having this conversation! He choose a wrinkled old White Guy instead of the one who deserved it!
Why attack Palin, your guy made the wrong choice!

Posted by: Will Sasser | September 2, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

This is John McCain’s fault – for not vetting this woman (he’s obviously lying if he claims he did). He panicked at the crowds Obama was drawing, and decided he needed a woman (in hopes of snatching up Hillary’s 18 million) but all he is doing is cracking us up – instead of putting cracks in a glass ceiling. The selection of this un-prepared, un-vetted, disaster in the making sets the feminist cause back 50 years.
Wait till the stuff comes out about her husband’s (and her) former membership in the Alaska Independence Party – who are committed to seceding from the US and taking the oil with them. Their motto “Alaska first”.

Posted by: Denise Velez | September 2, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Frankly, this is all to be expected, and should probably not phase people in the long run.
I find the feverish attention as a sign that the Obama supporters are very concerned about the Gov. Palin candidacy. Let’s face it, if people thought she was a non-threat, she would not be getting this attention. It is the opposite of the tactics used by the New York Times and other agencies who initially supported McCain within the Republican candidate pool – helping choose who they thought would be a weaker candidate.
Gov. Palin has energized the conservative base. There is no getting around that. For that, I think McCain did make a smart move. Just like democrats worrying about party unity for their convention, there was concern about unifying and bringing in the conservative base. I think this has unified the Republican Party before the convention.
I think the debates will be the key for those who are undecided – not the rags in the supermarket stands. Most people take what the magazines say with a box of salt.
As for the people who put comments here, I don’t expect to change anyone’s mind. Everyone putting comments here have probably made up their minds.

Posted by: EMD | September 2, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Obama supporters are trying to take the focus off of their empty suit guy with terrorist and criminal friends and racist church and muslim upbringing to discredit a woman who has an education and ambition and also has a record as a reformer and brought Alaska out of debt. She actually has more experience than Obama, who has never had experience in running anything but his mouth. What major life decision has he ever had to make? Should I snort the coke or smoke the crack?

Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

See: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/02/us/politics/02vetting.html?pagewanted=2&_r=1&8au&emc=au
Now, the truth is starting to come out about the reckless, cavalier, and dangerous decision made by McSame to place Sarah (knock ‘em up) Palin on the ticket. If this is the type of decision making to be expected of McSame in the White House, then he is a very dangerous man indeed to even be considered for the presidency. Hopefully, the American people (this doesn’t include mentally deranged social conservatives) will wake up and smell the coffee before it’s too late. Obama/Biden 08!!!

Posted by: caliguy55 | September 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Who is taking care of Obama’s children when he and Michelle are on the campaign trail? It isn’t either one of their parents.

Posted by: Ari Reed | September 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

I agree with Will Sasser who wrote,
“What about Rev Wright?
William Ayers?
Why won’t BO release his medical records?”
When will Obama be vetted? If Biden were at the top of the ticket and choosing a running mate he would never opt for Obama with all of his seriously questionable connections. Instead we’re talking about Palin–the No. 2 on the ticket–and giving Obama that pass that’s been going on for some 19 months. It’s the same pass that allowed him to get through the primary season without falling to Clinton. Now it’s happening again. The sexist treatment of Palin is a repeat of the media’s sexist treatment of Clinton. Oh well!

Posted by: Kyle | September 2, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Denise Velez, Palin was properly vetted and knew about Bristol’s pregnancy before he asked Palin to be his VP. He knows every move Palin has ever made in her life. She has been on the list before Obama picked Biden over Hillary.
I don’t know where you people get your information but it is not a legitimate news site. Huffington Post, Alan Colmes, Liberaland and Daily Kos are going to tell you what they want you to know, not what is truth.

Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Choosing Palin for a running mate is just another perfect example of why we can’t afford to elect McSame come November. He’ll finish what Bush started…the total destruction of the USA!

Posted by: Karen | September 2, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Karma is a boomerang. She’ll be rewarded with a victory in November.

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Whats wrong ABCNews… Did you run out of new attack stories on this women so now your doing stories on others attacking her?

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Who is taking care of Obama’s children when he and Michelle are on the campaign trail? It isn’t either one of their parents.
Ari Reed
Ari,
Michelle Obams has only said a thousand times that when she has to go out on the campaign trail that her retired Mother looks after her precious girls!
Next….

Posted by: Newswatcher | September 2, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Trailer meet trash.

Posted by: Darryl | September 2, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Where’s the mullet? I don’t see no mullet in any pics

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Well, if nothing else, we on the left should thank John McCain for converting so many “traditional value” conservatives into militant feminists over night.
I had thought, from years of listening to the likes of James Dobson, Jerry Falwell and Phyllis Schafly, that traditional value conservatives believed women SHOULD be held to a different standard than men, because their most important role in society is to bear and raise children and be obedient “helpmeets” for their husbands, just like the Good Book says.
But now, reading this thread, I see conservatives arguing that a mother with five children (one of them with Downs Syndrome), who already has a very demanding day job — plus a husband who also works away from home much of the year — should throw herself into a grueling campaign for the vice presidency — and anyone who thinks otherwise is a filthy male chauvinist pig.
Color me astonished.
What’s next: a bra-burning rally at the Republican National Convention?

Posted by: Peter Principle | September 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Hey Obama people: Let the pros in the tabloids handle this. They know how to dig. You guys are amateurs and you’ll get blamed – or screwed by some Rovian trick like the Bush Texas National Guard memo.
This bimbo is bad news.

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Who is taking care of Obama’s children when he and Michelle are on the campaign trail? It isn’t either one of their parents.
Ari Reed
Edit:
Ari,
Michelle Obams has only said a thousand times that when she has to go out on the campaign trail that her Mother looks after her precious girls!
Next….

Posted by: Newswatcher | September 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Good pic of Sarah “I’m Not Flat-Busted” Palin. Where’s the breastfeeding?

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Forget Bristol. The REAL reason you should flee Sarah Palin like the plague is that she is a DOMINIONIST (google it, scary stuff people), aka neo-pentacostalism. You know, the speaking in tongues, snake handling, faith healing antics you might have seen on TV….. YOU WANT THAT CALLING THE SHOTS AS POTUS???? You thought BushCo were pushing for theocracy, you ain’t seen nothing yet! The primary goal for Dominionism is to replace our secular government with a theocracy and bit by bit they’ve been hard at work doing exactly that. How do you think somebody with such little experience got picked for that spot? If McCain kicks it, your next POTUS WILL rule this nation as a THEOCRACY, and not the faith that our “founding fathers” established either, but with all the nutcase theatrics that we’ve seen with the Terry Schiavo intervention, Rapture nuts, the “war on Christmas” fanatics, and oh yes, abortion will be VERY illegal in any form. Roe vs Wade WILL be wiped out, especially after 3 soon to be retiring Supreme Court justices get replaced by her administration. Who will it be? James Dobson? Pat Buchanan? Reverend Moon? John Ashcroft, or perhaps Ken Blackwell. Why do you think the religious right are so fired up about her? Minority rights? GONE! Secular education? GONE! Contraception? GONE! Freedom of Religion? GONE! Will there be more wars? YOU BETTER BELIEVE THERE WILL BE! Forced prayer in schools? YEAH BUDDY! ****DANGER WILL ROBINSON DANGER!!!****

Posted by: LogicRulez | September 2, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

I find it difficult to read the indignant conservatives coming to the defense of Palin, when her role as a mother of five is mentioned to be in conflict with her duties as vice-president. The fact is, we learned it from you! Republicans have touted their moral superiority for the past 25 years. “Tradtional family values” of the 50′s is all that the Republicans have been refering to when they claim they’ll return America back to it’s glory days. You know, before hippies, the culture war of the 60′s, the Clintons and now Obama. All of a sudden, Republicans want it all. The moral high ground of a pro-life stance while begging America for tolerance and understanding for a sexually active pregnant teen. Boy, sexual repression in this Party sure manifests itself in many different ways…

Posted by: RJD | September 2, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I find it difficult to read the indignant conservatives coming to the defense of Palin, when her role as a mother of five is mentioned to be in conflict with her duties as vice-president. The fact is, we learned it from you! Republicans have touted their moral superiority for the past 25 years. “Tradtional family values” of the 50′s is all that the Republicans have been refering to when they claim they’ll return America back to it’s glory days. You know, before hippies, the culture war of the 60′s, the Clintons and now Obama. All of a sudden, Republicans want it all. The moral high ground of a pro-life stance while begging America for tolerance and understanding for a sexually active pregnant teen. Boy, sexual repression in this Party sure manifests itself in many different ways…

Posted by: RJD | September 2, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I find it difficult to read the indignant conservatives coming to the defense of Palin, when her role as a mother of five is mentioned to be in conflict with her duties as vice-president. The fact is, we learned it from you! Republicans have touted their moral superiority for the past 25 years. “Tradtional family values” of the 50′s is all that the Republicans have been refering to when they claim they’ll return America back to it’s glory days. You know, before hippies, the culture war of the 60′s, the Clintons and now Obama. All of a sudden, Republicans want it all. The moral high ground of a pro-life stance while begging America for tolerance and understanding for a sexually active pregnant teen. Boy, sexual repression in this Party sure manifests itself in many different ways…

Posted by: RJD | September 2, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Visualize
The perpetually grinning psycho bimbo vs Vladimir Putin

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Judgement. What this VP pick shows about McCain. That is the most important point about Sarah Palin.
Did McCain roll the dice and will he gamble our national interests as easily? McCain called this woman, who he had met once for a few minutes and then talked with over a phone, his soulmate. What does this say about McCain.
Not comforting to me.

Posted by: Just A Mom | September 2, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Even if you don’t get your “news” from the tabloids at the supermarket, you certainly see them every time you shop for groceries.
The only point about her daughters pregnancy that should affect the election is her stand on abstinence being the only method of birth control, and that nothing else should be taught to teenagers. One should assume that this is what she has taught at home. If so, then it hasn’t worked, so why should we think it would work nationally.
Of equal importance is her history of taking earmarks (including being for the bridge to nowhere), wanting to ban books in the public library, mass firings of anyone who doesn’t agree with her (which shows she doesn’t exactly work well with others, how can she possibly work with congress etc.

Posted by: Sharlene | September 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

all of you clowns insisting on airing all of the bad things Obama has done, why dontt you outline them? If there are soooo many of them, well then give us a list, some URLs or “proof”. Probably because you only wish there was as many skeletons as McSame and Im-Palin have.
Face it, Blinky McSame messed up. Boo Hoo.

Posted by: Blinky McSame | September 2, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

To s.b. You are a classic example of why more emphasis should be placed on teaching social studies in school. Remember that when you open your mouth you remove all doubt.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWW!
It’s the mainland USA invasion of Caribou Barbie and the Snowbillies!

Posted by: KittyKatMan | September 2, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

So if it’s okay that the Obama’s leave their children with their grandparents, what’s the difference if Palin’s husband,who co-parents, or grandparents watch her kids?

Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Geee… the editor of the Magazine is a Clinton supporter… how shocking.

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

This is all so humorous to read. I am not sure about Palin but the venomous hipocricy of the liberal posters here is disgusting and typical. You so called party of inclusiveness you say? That’s right unless you are a woman governor from Alaska with five children who likes to hunt. Oh and she does actually have executive experience, unlike Biden, Obama, and even McCain who have sucked off the Senate teet their whole political careers.
Oh, and to the person who referred to her husband as a redneck oil worker….its people like him who are working hard to provide you your gas for your Prius.

Posted by: curlyrip | September 2, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

She looks like just another politician using a baby for a photo opportunity. Too bad her son will rarely see his own mother. She can go spout her family values speech back in Alaska. I have no respect for her style of “family values”.

Posted by: yathink | September 2, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

What’s really sad about many of these comments about Sarah Palin is how she is being vilified for living her beliefs. Not to mention that both Barry Obama and Biden were both born to mothers who didn’t have husband. That makes them illegitimate doesn’t it?

Posted by: Steve Smith | September 2, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

Palin may be weak on the GOP ticket … but Obama is weak on the DEM ticket …
and we don’t vote for Veeps … we vote for President … so we have a choice ..
War Hero or Big O

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | September 2, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

I commend John McCain for picking Sarah instead of that other trollop Fiorina who slept her way to the top at H-P.

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Palin has excellent teeth. Qualification enough, don’t you think?

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Rightwingers are in real denial if they think Obama is weak. Geesh only 38 MILLION Americans watched his acceptance speech on last Thursday night in a pro football stadium made up of over 85,000 plus folks with several thousand still standing in line outside the stadium still trying to get in the stadium. McCain could only hope that he gets 15 million viewers and maybe 18,000 in a stadium.
Secondly, Obama beat the Clinton machine which I dare anyone to say was some sort of easy task.
Thirdly, Obama has raised DOUBLE the amount of money that McCain has raised.
Fourth, Obama is leading McCain in all of the reputable polling firms by several percentage points.
I’d say that is damn good for a candidate who has been the target of false attacks on his religion, patriotism, etc.,etc…..
McCain should have picked Senator Kay Bailey-Hutchinson, Senator Olympia Snowe or former Governor Christie Todd Whitman. Now these women would have been very formidable on that ticket.

Posted by: Newswatcher | September 2, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

The guy who owns US Weekly gave $5,300 to Obama. Go figure why he did this story. Obama is extremely threatened by an experienced and accomplished woman. Palin is the Governor of Alaska managing 24,000 people with a budget of $10 billion. She took on the good old boy network bringing down the old corrupt Alaskan guard. She led and negotiated out the Natural Gas Pipeline Bill as well as an Ethics Reform bill. Can you point to any accomplishments of Obama? Obama as Chairman of the Subcommittee of the EU never held one hearing, voted present on over 100 important votes as a State Senator. Now that is telling you something – a record to run from not on. Governor Palin is a rising star!

Posted by: Bright Light | September 2, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

We sure do have a lot of bitter partisans out there taking shots at this story. If Obama had chosen a woman as his running mate and she had the same history as Governor Palin, do you really think the media would be treating the story the same? An unregulated media is a danger to a free society, not a protector of it. I dare you to find one standard that a person has to have to qualify as a “journalist”. They have no educational requirements, no standardized entrance exams, no licensing or review boards and no experience necessary but they quickly hide behind the constitution whenever they feel threatened, a document most of them have never read.

Posted by: jim234 | September 2, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Palin is a disaster for McCain. What was he thinking? Oh wait… he wasn’t…

Posted by: rachel hofflich | September 2, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Bright Light – what experience and accomplishments does Palin have? I’m not very impressed and she is a threat only to herself. After all, look how much scandal she got herself in as governor of a pissant state like Alaska – and imagine how much damage she could do to herself on the national stage?

Posted by: kloogie | September 2, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Sarah Palin is an empty pantsuit.

Posted by: Tim in Reston | September 2, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Palin has a degree in journalism and worked as a journalist.

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Sarah Palin is NOT an empty pantsuit. Johnny sure liked to look at her butt at their Ohio rally Friday.

Posted by: Vetter | September 2, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Now we all know how Joe gets off. So Sad.

Posted by: Ross | September 2, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

let’s not forget, McCain is also an adulterer, who lied about his affira to his wife for months, whiel seh recuprated from an auto accident. In today’s military, this woudl be a career-ending deal, but he did it before the tailhook Scandal ( come to think of it- “maverick?” – pre-Tailhook… hmmm… who says McCain is completely vetted?) so McCain got away with it. I am not sure he’d get an honorable discharge if he lied about his adultery today….. the press gave ahim a free pass on this one….

Posted by: joe | September 2, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

This is a JOKE, I am a Republican and I am truly disappointed in John McCain’s decision for VP, and YES Obama will get my vote in NOVEMBER…John you blew this one big time…

Posted by: Jack4Rep. | September 2, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Q. How does a Radical Pro Life woman get rid of a baby she doesn’t want?
A. She stays pregnant and then . . . . when she breaks her water . . . . she doesn’t immediately get examined by a doctor . . . then Ignores a Great Hospital in Texas . . . . gets on a plane for an 8 hour flight, (where No medical attention is possible) . . . lands and . . . . still doesn’t see a doctor . . . ignores a Great Hospital in a large Alaska city . . . . drives 2 hours and goes to a rural Small Hospital.
The baby survived despite the neglect . . . . but NOT because the Mother cared for it, as best she could have.

Posted by: Voter777 | September 2, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Is Palin’s husband a stay-at-home Dad? I read that he works on the rigs, so who is looking after the kids? It doesn’t matter which one, but someone should be home with them. Sounds like they are both crappy and self-serving parents.

Posted by: James Quinn | September 2, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Now she’s posing with her infant for tabloid magazines. I guess there’s no limit to how far she will exploit her family for her own personal gain.

Posted by: Allen | September 2, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Haven’t we got lots of fun with the “Reality Show” in the last 4 days? I’m a new blogger and this comment is one of the best I found:
Republicans complimenting McCain on his choice of Palin with the pregnant daughter remind me of the TV show Family Feud. No matter how stupid an answer one of their family members offers up, the rest of the family starts clapping and blurting out: “Good answer, Good answer!!”

Posted by: newcal78 | September 2, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Haven’t we got lots of fun with the “Reality Show” in the last 4 days? I’m a new blogger and this comment is one of the best I found:
Republicans complimenting McCain on his choice of Palin with the pregnant daughter remind me of the TV show Family Feud. No matter how stupid an answer one of their family members offers up, the rest of the family starts clapping and blurting out: “Good answer, Good answer!!”

Posted by: newcal78 | September 2, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I have no problem with a working mother, But when you represent the christian conservative party and have 5 childern..the message is clear, someone needs to stay home with the kids, unforetunately it’s not Sarah or her Husband (who has a full time job.).it’s her teenage childern. Babies raising babies should be their motto.
My other issue …A parent’s first job is to protect their childern. IF Sarah and her husband were aware of this pregnancy, then shame on them for useing Bristol and her boyfreind as the sacrificial lamb to their egos. The minute she put her name in the public ring, she knew that her family would be naked to the world. Anyone that says this is a private matter is living in lala land

Posted by: all4one | September 2, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

I am stunned to learn of the US Weekly owners is major contributor to Obama, Al Franken and worst of all, MoveOn.org – almost $10,000! Why is this scandal rag not required to disclose this information to its readership? No wonder they’re printing this trash about an amazing woman who has cleaned up corruption in Alaska and stood-up to the good-old boys to make history for women! I am appalled to learn that those who have advocated for women’s rights all these years are ONLY for liberal women’s rights. What an unbelievable slap to women everywhere. Sadly “the girlfriends are do’n it to themselves.”

Posted by: American Girl | September 2, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

And I thought that BUSH/CHENEY would forever be the worst administration ever……..until I imagined a McCain/Palin admin.
Palin in control of the USA Nuclear arsenol???

Posted by: jerome | September 2, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Can you tell that McShame places his country first? It really looks like it in his pick for VP.It is obvious to me that all he wants is that illusive office that just keeps slipping away from him. The theme of this convention should be “Gypsies, Tramps and Thieves”
I doubt that Cher would gract this mess with her talent.

Posted by: J | September 2, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

I am an African American Democrat woman and I will definitely vote for McCain/Palin. I watched new Diddy’s video addressing John McCain and I was shame to be black. http://abcnews.go.com/Video/playerIndex?id=5701173.

Posted by: Sally298 | September 2, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Really? I am a caucasian, republican woman and I will definitely vote for Obama. I have been reading about Sarah Palin, and now I am ashamed to be white.

Posted by: Barb | September 2, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Sally298, if you’re going to let anything that Diddy says be your basis for voting for ANYONE, God Bless You. You’ll get exactly the America that you deserve.

Posted by: Phillygirl | September 2, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

She took the long trip from Texas to Alaska in order to try to kill her baby without getting an “evil” abortion.

Posted by: timmy | September 2, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Q. How does a Radical Pro Life woman try to get rid of a baby she doesn’t want?
A. She stays pregnant and then . . . . when she breaks her water . . . . she doesn’t immediately get examined by a doctor . . . then ignores a Great Hospital in Texas . . . . gets on a plane for an 8 hour flight, (where No medical attention is possible) . . . lands and . . . . still doesn’t see a doctor . . . ignores a Great Hospital in a large Alaska city . . . . drives 2 hours and goes to a rural Small Hospital.
The baby survived despite the neglect . . . . but NOT because the Mother cared for it, as best she could have. God wants her to keep the baby..

Posted by: newman | September 2, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Republicans complimenting McCain on his choice of Palin with the pregnant daughter remind me of the TV show Family Feud. No matter how stupid an answer one of their family members offers up, the rest of the family starts clapping and blurting out: “Good answer, Good answer!!”

Posted by: newman | September 2, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

“the framing of Palin”???
Please, lighten up on the trendy pundit-speak, would you? to “frame” someone has (or had before the Age of the Pundit) a meaning very different from the one you intend. At least I hope it does.

Posted by: BC | September 2, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Levi Johnston has another son named Connor whose mother he did not marry. I would like to know what Sarah Palin and her WasiliaWacko Church think about that.

Posted by: kravitz | September 3, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

At least this presidential election will lead to voter education. Start w/pregnancy — Low level amniotic fluid leaks are common, and aren’t a danger in many circumstances. (Since amniotic fluid is created regularly, there’s little risk to the baby.) Most often, drs tell the woman to monitor and come in if there’s rising temperature (fever from infection) or pain or increased fluid. Especially if it’s not a first child, and the dr/woman are comfortable with how a pregnancy progresses, there’s little reason to panic. And no basis for claiming the woman is trying to kill her baby.

Posted by: DOM | September 3, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

One question:
Why is it that none of the Republican trolls know how to spell?
Am I being “elitist” to ask that?

Posted by: JMP | September 3, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

This chick has disaster written all over that forced and toothy grin of hers. Moose hunter? We are expected to be impressed by a moose hunter. Yep, moose hunter.

Posted by: Carl | September 3, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

OBAMAMANIACS ARE UP IN ARMS DOING WHAT THEY DO BEST.. DESTRYING OTHER PEOPLE TO GET THE THE MESSIAH ELECTED..
KEVIN, YOU GOT A MOTHER IN LAW?
THIS IS GETTING REALLY FUNNY..
PALIN STUNNED OBAMA CAMPAIGN. THEY DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO.
WAIT UNTIL SHE SPEAKS TOMORROW..
THAT WILL BE THE END OF OBAMA..TEMPLE OF DOOM AND ALL.
TJ, LAUGHING ABOUT KEVIN HAVING A REPUB MOTHER IN LAW..
THANKS MCCIAN, I JUST LOVE TO SEE THEM LIBERALS SQUIRM..

Posted by: TJ | September 3, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

What family values? Four months from now Palin will have the following in her house:
-a husband who works full time locally
-a wife who works full time
-a newborn with Downs Syndrome who has very special medical and parenting needs
-a newborn whose parents are still children
-a 17-yr-old who obviously needs more parental love and guidance
-two other minor children who will probably be ignored as any available adult attention goes to the two newborns
Now, I ask you, if you are a parent and the above is in your house, would you agree to spend the next 4 or 8 years flying around the nation and the world and working long hours? Or would you and your spouse decide to curtail your careers for a few years, choose jobs where you can both be at home every night with your children, and give your needy family the support they need?
What does it say about Palin’s family values that she and her husband have SO many minor children in need in their home, yet, when McCain asked her to run for VP, the two Palin parents thought “yeah that sounds like a good idea?”
Pro-life doesn’t just mean that the mom and dad should support the child’s right to be born. Pro-life also means that the mom and dad should support the child AFTER s/he is born. And Palin fails miserably.

Posted by: newman | September 3, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

joe how much does the obama campaign pay you to be their shill?

Posted by: Thotman | September 3, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

What family values? Four months from now Palin will have the following in her house:
-a husband who works full time locally
-a wife who works full time
-a newborn with Downs Syndrome who has very special medical and parenting needs
-a newborn whose parents are still children
-a 17-yr-old who obviously needs more parental love and guidance
-two other minor children who will probably be ignored as any available adult attention goes to the two newborns
Now, I ask you, if you are a parent and the above is in your house, would you agree to spend the next 4 or 8 years flying around the nation and the world and working long hours? Or would you and your spouse decide to curtail your careers for a few years, choose jobs where you can both be at home every night with your children, and give your needy family the support they need?
What does it say about Palin’s family values that she and her husband have SO many minor children in need in their home, yet, when McCain asked her to run for VP, the two Palin parents thought “yeah that sounds like a good idea?”
Pro-life doesn’t just mean that the mom and dad should support the child’s right to be born. Pro-life also means that the mom and dad should support the child AFTER s/he is born. And Palin fails miserably.

Posted by: newman | September 3, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

i love how the repugs are barking the talking points on this. For a democrat we could care less, other than give 100% support for. a repug i paraphrase “these people have no moral values and must find jesus for their sins”. to see the hypocrisy of this in only 5 days tells a beautiful mosaic of pandering and bible thumping thats finally seeing the light of since the the reagon revolution.

Posted by: adam | September 3, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Newman – don’t worry, I’m sure the Palins will find the Naval Observatory to be a great home, the support staff a great help, and the medical care from Bethesda wonderful.

Posted by: Manny | September 3, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

BREAKING: Democrats Release Sarah Palin’s Social Security Number
The Politico has received an opposition research file from the Alaska Democrats. You can read it in PDF here.
In the file, the Democrats have released Sarah Palin’s social security number minus the last four digits. Also tied to the information are her various home addresses.
Back in 2005, Democrats used Michael Steele’s social security number to get his credit record.
It is atrocious that the Democrats would not only seek out Sarah Palin’s social security number, but release it in opposition research to the press.
We need to know who did this. We also need to know what happened. We also need to know if it was used to bolster the Democrats’ opposition research.
When it happened to Michael Steele, it turns out the Democrats knew about it and did nothing.
They cannot not take action now.
http://www.redstate.com/diaries/redstate/2008/sep/02/breaking-democrats-release-sarah-palins-soc/
Obama has said, “If they bring a knife, we bring a gun” the man is absolutely loathsome

Posted by: hfp | September 3, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Please keep here on the ticket. Pretty please.
Palin/McCain change that will secede

Posted by: doug | September 3, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Palin Daughter Baby Daddy — “Don’t Want Kids”
Levi Johnston, the guy who impregnated the daughter of GOP veep nominee Sarah Palin, says so on his MySpace page (which is now offline):
Johnston proudly declares: “I’m a f—in’ redneck.”
“I live to play hockey. I like to go camping and hang out with the boys, do some fishing,” he says on the site.
He also warns that if anyone messes with him, “I’ll kick ass.”
The Web site, before it was removed, appeared not to have been accessed for a year.
On it, he admits to having a girlfriend.
On the part where it asks about children, he wrote, “I don’t want kids.”

Posted by: newman | September 3, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

The Washington Post reports today (9/3) that Palin wasn’t even vetted by the McCain team until the day before she was announced.
McCain talked with her for about 15 minutes at a conference in February, then didn’t meet with her again before asking her to be VP last week.
This was his first executive, presidential decision.
I’m a website manager and spend more time interviewing a programmer than McCain does interviewing his VP! Can anyone seriously say that this man has the judgment and temperament to make presidential decisions!
It’s not so much about Palin – it’s what it says about McCain!

Posted by: DB | September 3, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

I consider myself a femenist. But for Sarah Palin, to leave her infant child and pregnant teenager at home while she persues a political carreer, in my opinion shows poor judgement as a mother. This is a very important time for her to bond with her baby and her daughter might need extra support at this time. I am not saying that she can’t juggle family and career, but there is a HUGE difference between governor’s house in Alaska and the demanding and time consuming campaign for the Vicepresidency. Do I see some power thirst here???

Posted by: gilda | September 3, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

The poor vetting bothers me, but I think the real story is that McCain wanted to pick Lieberman and was thwarted by “the right”, and so this “maverick” didn’t follow his heart, he played a wild card. That’s not leadership. Standing up to one’s own party insiders would have been “maverick”, but that’s not McCain-the-candidate. Sad. We can expect more of the same if he’s elected.

Posted by: Tim | September 3, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

Why is it that Todd Palin never holds his infant son? This entire time, since Sarah Palin was introduced to America, that poor daughter has been stuck with the baby. Check out pics and footage of videos.
What is up with that? Poor baby! And I am referring to the daughter!!!

Posted by: JoJo | September 3, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Tim – There’s maverick and then there’s stupid. Are you seriously suggesting that it would be better for McCain to pick Leiberman and lose any hope of winning? Leadership can come from knowing how to compromise/find alternative approaches in order to achieve the ultimate goal.
Personally, I’d rather have a leader who keeps his (or her) eye on the ball and succeeds in priority goals, then one who sticks to personal desire/principles and achieves nothing.

Posted by: TimToo | September 3, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

I am not a Dem or GOP backer, but i do have questions?
1) If this was Obama’s daughter pregnant at 17 still in high school, wouldnt the GOP be trashing Obama about family values, better yet blaming him for all the fatherless children in the black community who are on welfare in America?
2) What kind of example is this to Americans and the world that we have a family in the white house that could be compared to any episode of Jerry Springer and Maury Povich show?
3) Did this kid Levi take a paternity test?
4) Are they forcing him to marry her?
5) Imagine Gov. Palin facing Putin, can you imagine what he may be thinking in his mind?
6)The family has problems, from the state trooper brother in law from PET CEMETARY and Palins insistence on getting him fired?
&)CAN YOU IMAGINE IF IT WAS MICHELLE OBAMA INVOLVED IN SOME PARTY MOVEMENT TO GET REPRARATIONS AND FORTY ACRES AND A MULE FOR EVERY BLACK IN AMERICA? OR BETTER YET SESSATION OF FOUR STATES FOR BLACKS ONLY?
YOU GOP GUYS ARE RIDICULOUS AND DONT SEE THE DOUBLE STANDARDS YOU BRING TO THIS COUNTRY

Posted by: mamaboy | September 3, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

This is really really good
for the Republicans.
And even if it turns out that
the father of daughter Bristol’s baby is really Newt Gingrich, it will still be good for Republicans.
It doesn’t seem to matter that Ms.Mayor Palin left her tiny town of 6,000
22 MILLION DOLLARS IN DEBT.
Heck, that’s good for Republicans too.
And being FOR the Alaskan Bridge To Nowhere before she flipped to being
against it?
Good for Republicans.
Troopergate, Alaska?
Good for Republicans.
Palin’s now well-known love Earmarks/PORK in Alaska?
Good for Republicans.
What about the disclosure that McCain is actually a brain-eating zombie who
wants to eat millions of American schoolchildren raw while launching ALL our nuclear missiles at the rest
of the world?
Good for Republicans.
Notice a pattern here?
Everything’s good for Republicans these days, isn’t it?
Hey, I get my info from the source:
Republicans.

Posted by: nikto | September 3, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

You didnt tell the folks who owns US magazine. The same guy named WENNER that owns the leftist rag Rolling Stone and is gives millions to Obama.

Posted by: Bill | September 3, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

ok I’m voting Democrat but I want to say on this, that these magazines are such trash and have hurt so many people, I wish they could get some laws passed so that they can’t be displayed by the registers or something. Very often they put misleading stuff on the covers. It brings down our society.

Posted by: Rod M | September 3, 2008, 6:09 am 6:09 am

Don’t underestimate the supermarket crowds. They are mostly women. They’ve seen one woman taken down by the same people this election. And they will not listen to you this time either (when you were savaging Hillary, the worse you got, the more vote dhe got – too bad that’s irrelevant in her party)

Posted by: NotYoursweetie | September 3, 2008, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Has anyone brought up the fact that the publisher of the magazine, Ms. Wenner, is a Obama supporter?

Posted by: david | September 3, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am

I’m wondering if the RNC has checked with Mr. Palin about his willingness to move to Washington, D.C., and become a househusband. Given his “rugged, outdoorsman” biography, my guess is that he would stay in Alaska, with Republican Family Values being chucked out the window.

Posted by: Joel | September 3, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am

Losing the battle? It’s awfully hard to win the battle on the particular grounds you’ve seen when the publisher of that magazine is a staunch Obama supporter, a frequent Democratic donor, and the guy who was responsible for Obama’s glowing halo cover on Rolling Stone Magazine a couple of months ago.
Let’s be honest here. There’s no chance that Sarah Palin is going to get a fair shake from someone like Jann Wenner. That’s true of a good number of magazine publishers who politically sit right where he does.
Time Magazine has put Obama on its cover six or seven times this year, none of them negatively. People magazine has practially drooled all over him at least once (and I think they’ve run two feature stories on him and his family).
Truth is, Sarah Palin doesn’t live the sort of life the folks who publish those magazines like. She’s not the right “kind” of woman nor mother. so they’re going to denigrate her as much as they possibly can because, goodness knows, they don’t want a whole bunch of other Moms out there seeing her success and thinking that their lives are just fine the way they are. That wouldn’t sell any magazines, would it?

Posted by: Jimmie | September 3, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

Amazing how the Liberal Scum lords come out to attack. That’s whey liberals are fuc*ing usless.

Posted by: Doug | September 3, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

pennsylvaniavoter,
Actually Sinclair was arrested in D.C. when he giving a press conference on a WARRANT ISSUED IN DELAWARE BY BIDEN.
Not a word about Warrantgate from the media. They protect the inside beltway crowd and go after non-Washington people like Palin.

Posted by: geevill | September 3, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Another obvious media outlet in the bag for Obama. This article in US Weekly is very misleading and false. Why don’t they change their name to Obama Weekly. They put a nice picture of Barack and MIchelle “Why he loves her” and puts a pic of Sarah and her baby and calls it Lies and Scandals. I WILL NEVER BUY ANOTHER US WEEKLY AGAIN!!!!!!

Posted by: Kay | September 3, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Palin doesn’t need to stay home because she’s a woman and a mother.
She needs to stay home because she is unfit for the Vice Presidency. And the fellow who picked her is clearly off his rocker.
Yeah, women can work as they raise children — although raising them fulltime makes a day at the office look like a picnic.
But it seems that this rightwing nutcase isn’t doing such a bang-up job of it. And she’s cheap.
The USA deserves better and will get better with Obama and Biden in office.

Posted by: charlotte | September 3, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Maybe you should look at the usweekly page that hosts the article and look at the comments section in response to this column. It seems pretty clear their readership does not share the sentiment author of this article.

Posted by: Johnny | September 3, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

The left-wing media is really wetting their panties over Palin. She’s more experienced than Obama, and worked her way up the padder. Obama talked his way up the ladder. Big difference. The more we know about Palin’s family, the more it seems like an average American family. People can relate to her. Sure, she has blemishes – we all do. But if the left-wing media continues to assault her over family issues, there will be a backlash. Many Americans can relate to her.

Posted by: Mike Garcia | September 3, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

“Let’s say, instead, like millions of working-class Americans, you get your “news” on the political race from the supermarket aisle’
I doubt that Rush would be interested in this, since there are data to back up the statement. Rush only deals in fabrications.

Posted by: AutismNewsBeat | September 3, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

What a classy, classy woman the Republicans have chosen to represent themselves and, unfortunately, the USA. One can only wonder when the words “Meth Lab” will be associated with this walking episode of Cops.
Has the entire country become a trailer park?

Posted by: Amy | September 3, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I think it is unfortunate that the press is concentrating on what should be private issues. Palin has the right to choose to work after having a baby and while waiting to become a grandmother. That is the whole point of the Democrats’ push for equal rights and equal choice.
The press should give more attention to Palin’s willingness to eliminate political rivals and install cronies in government, actions well matched to what the country has seen in the GWBush presidency.
Palin is anti-science, pro-censorship, and completely clueless on economic issues. She left her town in comparatively huge debt and increased its taxes 38%. She can’t reduce government spending, and she can’t balance a budget. She rejects the science on climate change and the endangerment of polar bears, and she wanted the town librarian to remove books that she found offensive.
Palin’s personal and family issues are private matters, but all her other failures of judgment are not.

Posted by: Jonjay | September 3, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

I find the feverish attention as a sign that the Obama supporters are very concerned about the Gov. Palin candidacy.
Actually, We are just amazed that McCain left us this gift-wrapped present.
Still, feel free to continue believing what you believe. It only makes our job easier if you actually think we are scared.

Posted by: libarbarian | September 3, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

She is the definition of the pathetic & vindictive petty tyrant who lashes out at anyone who doesn’t kiss her butt.
We don’t need a female Cheney. We didn’t even need the first one.
As for “Troopergate” – do you idiots believe everything some woman tells you about the guy who dumped her sister?
Hey – the girl who dumped my brother murdered JFK & Jesus and is single-handedly responsible for AIDS. Believe that you morons?

Posted by: libarbarian | September 3, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

MANY AMERICANS CAN RELATE TO HER…
Not women, unfortunately. Palin has the life no woman wants; 5 kids a low achieving husband and a pregnant teen.
You add vp on top of that and its an accident waiting to happen.
What is really disturbing is…
She is either on her back, or, on her feet.
Sets woman back at least, a hundred years.
On top of it all, she wants to take away other woman’s choices so their life can look just like hers.
The last thing we want to see for the next 4 years is this woman working herself to death. And, possibly pumping out more babies, herself. Apparently, she is not using birth control either. 7 distractions and counting…

Posted by: Independent Voter | September 3, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Maybe John McCain will refuse to be interviewed by them.

Posted by: Naveen | September 3, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

I don’t know anyone who has expressed positive words about Palin who cares about what her 17 y/o daughter has done. At 17 y/o you’re an adult and are responsible for your own decisions. If you think Palin’s a bad parent because her daughter is pregnant at 17, I’d ask you, “so if you decided to have sex without protection at 17 and the result was a pregnancy would you blame your parents?”
I find it interesting that despite evidence that she’s been a strong, effective, and popular leader in Alaska, the only news we’ve heard in the past week has focused on the negative. I’d agree with other posters that the ugly hammer that had fallen on Clinton hasn’t spared Palin.
Imagine, for example, if the media started making a stink about Obama, a father, doing drugs in an earlier part of his life. (Yes, he did. Look it up.) What if we find out that Palin has as well? Here’s the next headline we can expect to see:
“Palin, mother of five, sets the example by doing drugs.”
And here’s an example of posts which will resultantly be posted:
“Palin is a horrible parent and she should spend more time at home!”
The only thing that’s missing is the sexist name calling. Standby for the female dog, whiner, and female genitalia references…..just like Clinton all over again.

Posted by: MajorTom | September 3, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Independent Voter: Sound like a life of a black woman but at least she has a husband at home for some support. How many single mothers do we have without the baby daddy and with not support. Baby daddy not where to be found.

Posted by: jjoy | September 3, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

And to think that when it was clear John McCain and Barack Obama would be the candidates, I was rejoicing that we would have two intelligent, patriotic men who actually cared about and would concentrate on the important and critical issues facing us. Well, I was half-right. I believe Obama is speaking about the economy today…..

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 3, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Patriot – You use the word “intelligent” WAY too much in your defense of Obama and his supporters. You are over compensating, big time. If Obama gets off the teleprompter, he is a bumbling idiot. Besides, how smart can someone really be if they sit in Rev. Wright’s church for 15-20 years without realizing he is hateful, racist idiot?

Posted by: RJ | September 3, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

How many single mothers on welfare becasue the fathers failed to accept responsiblity. If you are married, I do not care how much sex you have with your husband and do not care how many babies a married woman has.

Posted by: jjoy | September 3, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Palin, an palling choice for GOP veep.
Palling choice for GOP. Who can stop the bloggers? Obama can tells us that family issues are out of campain; but the bloggers do their compain online. Who can stop them?
McCain did not think about internet power when he picked Palin. These things will just hang-on on the web for years. Good luck to Palin.

Posted by: jurgen, MA | September 3, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Let’s think Hillary women, were you there for he views or the fact that she is a woman? If Hillary’s women vote Palin, then they should be ashamed because they misled the world as a follower of Hillary. I do feel for Palin, she is not ready for what is about to happen to her home life, byway of media!!!!!

Posted by: meme | September 3, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

MEME: Thank you MEME. This Hillary supporter will be giving her vote to McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Sally298 | September 3, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

You know, when I’m standing in line at the supermarket, I just see a picture of the mama and her baby. I don’t even see the rest of it, those silly headlines. I see that she had a baby four months ago! And it has Downs syndrome! And then I pay the cashier. And I think warm thoughts toward that woman.

Posted by: C. | September 3, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Are you kidding me??? No one is losing the battle aside from those who still try to claim media-objectivity. Where was the outrage when Gore was shown to have failed to adhere to his strict code of environmentally friendly living?
People see this for what it is — tripe, dribble, and biased. The only losers will be the Obama camp. Sorry, you just don’t know how to be presidential, people. Mark my word.

Posted by: Truth | September 3, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

I am so sick of hearing about sexism when it’s really Sarah Palin’s self absorbed ambition that has caused this scrutiny on her family. I am a working woman…always have been, with two children and a husband. However, you can not be VP of the U.S. with 5 children, especially with one who has Down Syndrome. Not and give that child everything he needs. How do I know? I am the mother of a child with Down Syndrome. I would like to know how much therapy and intervention that child is receiving. It takes an inordinate amount of time to care for special needs children. Further, Down Syndrome children ussually have a host of other medical issues that require the attention of a Mother and a Father. What is all this rhetoric about a baby not needing his Mother and a Father wouldn’t be asked these questions. The Mother is the primary caretaker of babies in all species, but I forgot, she doesn’t believe in evolution. The Republicans need to stop trying to shift this mistake to a sexist issue. It was a bad choice, un-vetted and she and McCain have bad judgement.For the sake of her family, she should have politely declined the “too good to be true” offer.

Posted by: Pat | September 3, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Obama ’08 – Hope on Dope!

Posted by: Patrick | September 3, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Does Klein really believe we’re all sheep? that we believe the world is accurately reflected in supermarket tabloid covers? (Except National Enquirer, they get an exemption because they did stick with a scoop.) Klein doesn’t bother to tell us that he is an Obama supporter. He doesn’t bother to tell us that US is owned by Jann Wenner, an acknowledged super Obama supporter. I’ll make up my own mind who to support and this type of blatant manipulation makes me really want to know what the media is trying to hide. Maybe when we see similar investigative reporting on Obama. We get the good and the ugly on Palin in days. How did Obama work his way up the Chicago political machine? Did he challenge it and win? Did he report anyone for corruption? Did he resign any position to be able to give the public the truth? Palin did. Most voters would rather take a chance on even a scoundrel they know than an empty suit they can’t trust. To the sheep: “butcher shop” translates to free hand outs. Go on in.

Posted by: Sharla | September 3, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Hmm…since abstinence is working *so* well in her own home, let’s make it the centerpiece of sex education in this country. I think not.

Posted by: Meg | September 3, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Pat: Some women are must stronger the others.

Posted by: gre | September 3, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

You’ve got to be kidding with all the digging into Palin’s past. This is the best you libs got. Obama is being aided and abetted by the mainstream press. So far the only thing you have made plain to the world is that Gov. Palin happens to be a normal person with traditional values. So what. However, no one in the mainstream press wants to take a good hard look into Obama’s past. They’re afraid of what they might discover. What about the Rezko-Obama scandal? How could Obama or his wife not know of Rev. Wright’s hate sermons after 20 years association with the church? And why does Obama maintain a cozy relationship with the 1960s & 70s terrorist (okay, former terrorist) William Ayers. Obama has never bucked the system with Mayor Daley’s Chicago political machine. Why? Funny how most of the postings these days compare Obama to Palin. Obama has a do-nothing record (but he has plenty of socialist ideas). At least Palin has a record of accomplishment. Heck, she even ran a small business. Message to McCain: Palin is a keeper. Take your message to the American people. She’s a keeper.

Posted by: Patrick | September 3, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

The VP job should be easier than the Governor’s job, so it actually may be easier to care for the new baby.
Furthermore, the U.S. has only one strategic missile defense site at the present time. It is manned by the Alaska National Guard, sitting between one of our great erstwhile rivals – Russia – and one of our great allies – Canada. The commander-in-chief of this unit is none other than the governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin.
Gov. Palin is more ready to be President than is Obama. VP should be, relatively, a walk in the park.

Posted by: MKS | September 3, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

It is not sexist to ask pertinent questions regarding qualifications if for any reason Palin would have to step in to be President.
It is also appropriate to question McCain’s judgement in light of his rash decision to name an unknown as his VP just two months before an election.
Times are such that we the American people need the media to do their jobs and vet a canditate and inform us of any potential problems with that candidate.
Was it sexist to go after Clinton in the nineties? No, but it was about judgement.
I repeat it is not sexist to ask a candidate about their qualifications and if they have conflicts of interest or if they are telling the truth.
Her first words to the nation were that she was against the bridge to nowhere, when in fact that was a lie, she was very much for that bridge to nowhere. Once she lied, she became fair game.

Posted by: Marple | September 3, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Karen: “The liberal left and the MSM have never been so low.”
I am a member of the liberal left. I believe the pregnancy of Governor Palin’s daughter is none of my business. There are many, many others like me.
What I really think is that the right is so pi$$ed off about Governor Palin not being properly vetted that they’re taking it out on the left.
On the other hand, if you want to talk about the right never having been so low, you need only look at the lies and distortions about Senator Obama. Only trouble with that is the MSM didn’t fall for it.

Posted by: Shea Stadium | September 3, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

For all the mouth foaming about biased media — too liberal or too reactionary — the reason that scrutiny of Sarah Palin’s personal beliefs is relevant is because of her party’s platform and campaign tactics.
She insists that sex ed and contraception in schools must be scuttled, yet her own daughter gets pregnant while still in high school. She plays the gender-bias card yet the campaign is openly courting Hillary supporters merely on the basis that the GOP’s VP candidate has an ovary. She brags about love of country and patriotism yet had ties to a separatist organization touting secession for Alaska. She models herself as a fighter against congressional pork barrel politics yet hired a lobbyist to secure earmarks totaling in the millions for the little town of which she was mayor.
For these reasons you better believe that media scrutiny of her professed values and professional performance has deep significance for voters.

Posted by: DanMurphy | September 3, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

I just want to know what choices have Baby Daddy been given, where are Baby Daddy’s parents and what sort of gun is the Palin family going to be holding on Baby Daddy at the shotgun wedding. The kid has already said he doesn’t want to be married or have kids but too bad, he’s done gone and knocked up the Repub’s hopeful VP and he’ll now have to do as they say “or else!” That kid could blow them out of the water and I’ll bet there is money being paid for his cooperation right now. Ah, this is a true Kodak moment.

Posted by: What is choice anyway? | September 3, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Oops…I meant knocked up the Repubs hopeful VP’s daughter.

Posted by: What is choice anyway? | September 3, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Get real people. Palin could not even put socks on her babies feet (take a look at the pictures). How will she take care of the country? Yes, a women can do the job but what happens when the baby gets sick? does she call out? She just had a baby four months ago and her hormones are not even in order yet. Maybe if she had taken the time to get her daughter to planned parenthood she would not be expecting now. Mrs Palin take care of your family because if you can’t handle them you can’t handle our country.

Posted by: Bella | September 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Lina SAT,
John McCAin wanted to put Joe Lieberman or Tom Ridge on the ticket. The conservative base wanted him to do Palin instead. The reason for crapping vetting job. Please read and educate yourself

Posted by: Danny | September 3, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Today, after looking at some of the Leaders of Republican women come out in strong force to fight for Gov. Palin and women, this Democrat African American Woman is glad to switch to the Republican party from the Democrat party It is a shame that the Democratic women (Nancy Pelsoi) did not come and fight for Hillary as she was being mistreated by the media and others in her own party. Democratic can not fight for me….good by, hello Republican.

Posted by: Linda | September 3, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

McCain is taking down the Republican party. His love of beauty queens has struck again. #1 beauty queen his wife Carol whom he left because she was in an accident and put on some weight after she waited for him to come back from war. #2 Cindy, Rodeo beauty queen and now Ms Congeniality…Alaska’s #2. He needs to start thinking with his head. Sarah is taking down the Republican party.

Posted by: largue | September 3, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Family values have been the signature line for the Christian conservatives for a long time and the Republican party took advantages of them to get into power. When they’re asked to be held accountable for their beliefs, suddenly family values and personal responsibility don’t seem to matter. They’re all a bunch of hypocrites.
OK, teenagers go ahead and have *** but must marry if the girls get pregnant. You now have a new idol in the Palin family and blessed by Daddy J. Dobson. Birth control and condom are still not allowed (devil”s toys).

Posted by: newcal78 | September 3, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Sarah Palin personafies that women can be ambitious and have a family. As much as I admire her though, she could not have done it without her husbands support. He parents right along beside her. Most men think their job is over after the fun of making the baby is over. The Palins are the epitome of what a marriage is about. They are equals. They show that, like every other family in America they have problems but how they handle those problems is what we should be looking at, not the problem its self. There are many fine families in America, including single parents who do everything in their power to keep their teen on the straight and narrow and they still have teen pregnancies. It is admirable that Palin is standing by her daughter. Too much emphasis is being put on Palin’s daughter and not on what great things Palin brings to the table to help our country. The only thing US Weekly has accomplished is to reduce their magazine sales by 50%. Republicans and working moms are not going to buy this trash magazine.

Posted by: Kay | September 3, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

To:Decent American, Your name is an oxymoron with emphasis on moron. You are sadly mistaken if you think that the kings of cronyism, your republican party hasn’t tried to dig up Obamas past. Don’t forget how long they sat on the info about Edwards past. After the past 8 years of the systematic dismantaling of our jobs and industry and constant feeding frensy of the rich and greedy if you think that our current republican government is decent take a look at the real world or seek out the Wizzard of Oz for a brain!
Sick of it!!!

Posted by: Sick of it!!! | September 3, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

IT’S FAIRLY SIMPLE. GET PALIN TO DO MATERNITY TEST. JEEZ. HOW COMPLICATED IS THAT?

Posted by: CUTE-123 | September 3, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

A POLITICIAN’S PERSONAL LIFE IS HER OWN BUSINESS SO AS LONG AS THEY DON’T GIVE THE WHOLE NATION A LECTURE ON FAMILY VALUES. IF THESE POLITICIANS ARE GIVING LECTURES AND HITTING THE TALK SHOW CIRCUIT AND GIVING PEOPLE LECTURES ON ABORTION RIGHTS AND FAMILY VALUES THEN IT’S THE VOTERS RESPONSIBILITY TO SEE KNOW IF THEY ARE JUST HYPOCRITES OR MEAN THEIR WORDS. SO WHY IS IT THAT PALIN’S UNMARRIED DAUGHTER’S ISSUES NO LONGER THE PEOPLE’S BUSINESS WHEN SHE HAS NO PROBLEM GIVING LECTURES ON FAMILY VALUES? IF SHE CAN’T EVEN TAKE CARE OF HER OWN FAMILY HOW CAN SHE GIVE OTHER’S A LECTURE ON FAMILY VALUES? WHAT DO YOU PEOPLE THINK?

Posted by: FamilyValues | September 3, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

You guys make me sick. Palin is a hardworking mother. All she’s trying to do is protect her grandchild and protect her sister with “Troopergate”. Just leave her alone.

Posted by: Leave-her-alone | September 3, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Why has no one said this yet? The daughter of a woman and who has been brought up with her ideals and values – is pregnant.
At the end of the day would you want your 17 year old daughter to be pregnant? And is that how Palin or Clinton got to the places they are today?
And WHY is a vote for Palin synonymous with a vote for woman’s rights when she totally rejects one of the most fundamental rights of womankind – whether or not to have a child?

Posted by: Cari | September 3, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

US magazine has just done a hatchet-job on Mrs. Palin. She’s an amazing, educated woman, and a strong leader. She’s made some tough and loving choices in life, and is standing up for them. Just think: A pro-choice democrat could have had an abortion, both herself and for her daughter. No one would be the wiser. I think it’s amazing, and wonderful that both she and her daughter have instead chosen to cherish life.

Posted by: Mike | September 3, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

McCAIN Power 1st Country 2nd. This he has proven with his selection. He lacks judgment.

Posted by: John | September 3, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Palin = Geico Caveman..
The CON’s think anyone can do it…

Posted by: KMan | September 3, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

OMG….could the McCain campaign get anymore hillbilly and whiskey-tango?
This ranks right up there with an episode of Jerry Springer.
Next thing you know, there going be a real church-weddin’, and a proper re-cep-shun at Waffle House with free beers afterwards at Cousin Billy-Bob’s mo-beel home (double wide, that is…)

Posted by: Goober | September 3, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

Let’s look globally, shall we? We have the continued threats of N. Korea, Iran and the spread of terrorism. With that in mind, I’m all for Joe Biden and his ‘gang’ (as you put it), considering that he was central to the NATO debate surrounding the Balkans conflict in the 90s, has co-authored a strategy to end sectarian violence in Iraq (written with a leader of the Council on Foreign Relations) and chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Meanwhile, Gov. Palin’s foreign policy experience consists of… traveling to Germany and Kuwait to meet with members of the Alaska National Guard on active duty. Oh yes, but she did stop over in Ireland on the way back to the States. Don’t get me wrong – I admire any woman who can achieve leadership in government while trying to balance family and home (I’ve never run for local office in part because I just don’t think I could make it work for my family). But I have trouble seeing how she is qualified for the second-highest position in the U.S.

Posted by: Massive | September 3, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

She increased bake sale revenue by 20% in Mooseknuckle, that’s my kind of ‘executive’ experience!

Posted by: Barney | September 3, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

>”Alaska is the closest part of our continent to Russia. So, it’s not as if she doesn’t understand what’s at stake here.”
That has got to be the quote of the week…evidently you acquire foreign policy experience and ability via proximity. Assuming that is true, McCain ought to be able to fix any and all issues with Mexico simply through his presence. They should really infuse this little tidbit into their campaign….it represents W’s magical thinking perfectly!!

Posted by: Trigger | September 3, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

I love it!
Sarah is her own woman and it sounds like individuality dose not fit well into the Politically Correct world of the Democrats. So much for diversity!
She is loyal to her self and her past warts and all.
McCain is true blue and will not drop her like Obama did Rev. Wright and others.
For all of the of the “mean girl things” that she is accused of doing?
She is tough enough to handle herself in a tough world.

Posted by: G. Harris | September 3, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

It’s now becoming more clear why Karl Rove chose Palin to be McSame’s running mate. We knew it before and we see it yet again – Karl Rove is a political genius.
Palin has a closet full of scandal-type stuff – NONE of which is very important to consider when deciding who to vote for, but it is all the type of stuff that this nation’s media and “American Idol” populace just LOVES to dwell on.
If you’re Karl Rove you WANT Americans to stay focused on stupid, meaningless drivel like why is your daughter pregnant and where is the father, those damn democrats should just leave her alone because it’s their fault, they just want to get elected so they can knock on our door and take our guns away, yada yada yada belch burp etc.
You do NOT want voters talking about the economy or the deficit or Social Security or health care or Illegal Immigration because it is the GOP’s own track record of proven failure on these issues that has put this nation in it’s current state. Keep the discussion AWAY from real issues – at all costs.
You risk looking like a babbling fool for choosing a barely-qualified novice for veep – but every single minute that a swing voter spends thinking about Palin’s unimportant personal scandals is one minute that they do NOT spend on the MEANINGFUL issues – MISSION ACCOMPLISHED. Karl Rove’s brilliance shows yet again.
Barack Obama hit one out of the park when he said “……….if you don’t have any issues to run on, you want it all to be about personality. If you have got George Bush’s track record and John McCain voting 90 percent of the time in agreement with George Bush, then you probably you don’t want to talk about issues either.

Posted by: Rove | September 3, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Sarah Palin: BA on communications from U. of Idaho. B. Obama and J. Biden: Professors of constitutional law at U. of Chicago.

Posted by: juan | September 3, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state (and in both parties) – the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.

Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

I feel everyone should shut up about all this mess. Shut everything down the entire day before the election (other than extreme necessities)just like everything was shut down when the “Blue Law” was in effect years ago, and PRAY for guidance for each individual to make the choice “God wants us to make.”
Yah can’t know what to do if you don’t shut up, and be quiet to think. As the bible says; “Be still and know that I am.”
And when you vote in this upcoming election, the more important fact than who is going to be elected as president is the Supreme Court judges that the next president is going to appoint. The judges that will be appointed by the next president elect to the Supreme Court will last our lifetimes.
I am neutral on Palin. For years the men of this country have made a of mess of things in this country. How can a woman do any worse? Actually women do run the country. Where would this country be without moms? Moms are the ones’ who raise the kids, and handle every aspect of life you can think of without much help (so stated by my husband).
Sounds like the “good old boys’ club” is running afraid of losing control to woman (when in fact men have no problem in letting woman do everything else in daily life that have no glory, and the women who dislike Palin might have the same mind set in the reverse.
Pray for our country and leaders, don’t side track into negativity.

Posted by: Annie | September 3, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Republicans who questioned Michelle’s patriotism don’t seem to have much issue with Palin’s association with an Alaskan independence party that first and foremost wants Alaska to seperate from the US and become it’s own country…

Posted by: Scotti | September 3, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

The question that still we don’t have an answer for is: Is this Palin’s Daughters second Preganancy? can we see the medical records of where Palin gave birth and the care given to her before she gave birth to her 5th child? Here is more tough questions to ask about the VP Selection McCain… “This is not a smear, it is our obligation who you select is ready to lead this country and not lie to us like George and you have been doing. “Where has Bristol Palin been for the past year? Has she been attending high school? Or was she absent because of infectious mononucleosis for between five and eight months, as is now being reported on the Internet? Why would a 43-year-old woman, on her fifth pregnancy, with a Down syndrome child, after her amniotic fluid has started to leak, not go to the nearest hospital immediately, even if she was in Texas for a speech? Why would she not only not go to the hospital in Texas, but take an eight-hour plane flight to Seattle and then Anchorage? Why would she choose to deliver the baby not in the nearest major facility in Anchorage but at a much smaller hospital near her home town? Why did the flight attendants on the trip home say she bore no signs of being pregnant?’ It strikes me as likely that there are reasonable answers to these questions ” more reasonable than the only one given so far” – Andrew Sullivan

Posted by: Dan | September 3, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Ahh, libs are bubbling up like vampires reached by the light of day! I love it! “There is a G’d and He rained Gustav on the GOP convention!” Actually, after putting things on hold for a day, it played RIGHT into “Country First”! Ha ha!
“Palin lied, Trig is not hers!”
Ahem. (Dopeheads from Kos don’t know Down is likely OVER 40?) Take two.
“Palin’s daughter is pregnant!”
Oh yeah? Well! She’s KEEPING IT. THEY’RE GETTING MARRIED. And you’re gonna have to watch now yet ANOTHER cute youngster — Mr. Johnston — associated with the Palins!
See, you morons, that’s really what is all about when they talk about character being the most important. You get a bunch of these, and even when things get screwed up, somehow it ends up ok!

Posted by: trillium | September 3, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Bella said, “How will she take care of the country? Yes, a women can do the job but what happens when the baby gets sick? does she call out? She just had a baby four months ago and her hormones are not even in order yet.”
Bella, I see that you are apparently a medical doctor and can make diagnoses without seeing the patient! You don’t have any idea what her “hormones” are like! Aside from that, what do you think? You think that no women with children should ever seek to serve in public office or have executive positions?? Maybe we should all stay home and knit! Do you actually believe that if the baby gets sick, she will need to “call out”? As if the potential VP wouldn’t be able to afford a nannay to help? Besides, she is married! Perhaps her husband might be able to watch the baby! What a novel idea! Sexism is the only “ism” that is still okay, and, from what I have seen from the responses here, it’s still being inflicted on its victims (women) by members of their own sex! Unbelievable!!!!

Posted by: no one of consequence | September 3, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Dan, you moron, where to start… Deliver at a better facility… So the kid wouldn’t get Down syndrome? How stupid can you be?
“Down syndrome is a genetic disorder caused by the presence of all or part of an extra 21st chromosome.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Down_syndrome) The probability to have a baby like this at 45 is EIGHTYTWO TIMES larger than at 20. It’s 1 IN 19.

Posted by: trillium | September 3, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

if this is the best you dems can come up with, mccain will win by a landslide.
keep it coming you clueless morons.

Posted by: barak hussein obama | September 3, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

juan: yes, Obama and Biden went to better schools. You know what? There are some folks who went to even better schools then those two, and then published, and maybe taught others like Obama and Biden.
But it’s not based on QPA and schools. Turns out leaders are typically C students, and A students typically make a big mess. I’m sure there’s a good explanation for it, I remember Marilyn Vos Savant approached the subject (she’s the smartest at IQ 200 something, yet not UN president) — but I don’t recall the details.

Posted by: trillium | September 3, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Cari: I think she hated that Bristol got pregnant. But then she moved on.
Her values ARE reflected: Bristol keeps the baby! That’s takes more character than not having sex in the first place.
Bristol’s career is probably shot, but who knows: her baby may do something one day! When baby comes around, Bristol will be the age of Obama’s mother when she gave birth to him!

Posted by: trillium | September 3, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. palin was knocked up when she got married. she had her son 8 months later. so her daughter is just copying her mother. what mother would drag her child through the mud as an unmarried teenage person so be vp? what mother with any values would subject her daughter to that? this is disgusting. and her other baby will need intense care to help it get as far as it can – and she is carting it all over, putting him in crowds with germs and in different cribs all the time. she is an awful person in my book.

Posted by: karin | September 3, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. palin was knocked up when she got married. she had her son 8 months later. so her daughter is just copying her mother. what mother would drag her child through the mud as an unmarried teenage person so be vp? what mother with any values would subject her daughter to that? this is disgusting. and her other baby will need intense care to help it get as far as it can – and she is carting it all over, putting him in crowds with germs and in different cribs all the time. she is an awful person in my book.

Posted by: karin | September 3, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Bridge to Nowhere… It’s a terribly cool name for a pork project. Just please be aware that now to get to the Ketchikan INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT on the Gravina ISLAND, one continues to need to catch a… BOAT, because there’s no BRDIGE between said island and somewhere else.
Why did they PUT the International Airport there? No idea. Maybe there were advantages. Then why did’t they INCLUDE a bridge in the project? No idea. Maybe they thought they’d do it in the next budget.
Fact is, Palin inherited this mess. I’m sure they’d rather use a bridge rather than a boat to get to the International Airport, but now it’s folklore.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravina_Island_Bridge

Posted by: trillium | September 3, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Michelle’s mother is living with them to care for the two daughters. Also, Michelle is NOT on the campaign trail 7 days/week. She is home at least half of the week caring for her daughters. Yes, Palin did not support her mother-in-law when running for office because she thought her mother-in-law was “too liberal.” The mother-in-law confirmed all this and did not know what “Sarah” could bring to the ticket and is going to vote for Obama.

Posted by: diana | September 3, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Sarah has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain as Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican Governor, who was definitely part of the “old school” and who WAS very much in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change – and we got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state (and in both parties) – the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.

Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Two more of my female friends (we are all black democrat women) are planning to vote for McCain/Palin after today. I attended my first republican meeting, join the republican women group, donated money and will donate my time. I am a single mother, one of my girlfriend is a single mother, and my other girlfriend is single with no child.

Posted by: billie | September 3, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

The Palin’s household is a mess, right out of Trailerville…. she AND her husband need to spend a little more family time, fix the issues and when things are under control jump in with both feet.

Posted by: shelah | September 3, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Each time an Obama’s blogger writes sexist comment about Palin, a new voter is added to McCain/Palin side. Thank you Obama’s bloggers, we love you all…kisses

Posted by: willie | September 3, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Maybe the drug using kid will share drugs with the little one in her care to keep him quiet.
A mom with a knocked up kid who abuses drugs and a damaged kid goes back to work 3 days after birth.

Posted by: Steve D | September 3, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

I LOVE that cover!
Did I hear “a little sarcasm” in the parts of the speech I heard from her today? Or was it more like that, that I “only heard sarcasm”?
Gosh, is Palin going to tell us if we vote for Obama we’re all going to hell? This woman wanted to ban certain books in Alaskan libraries and get ‘creationism’ taught in public school – is she a politician or a preacher? Come down off the cross…we can use the wood. Amen

Posted by: Volker | September 4, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Regardless of her daughter’s current (and maybe second) pregnancy, has anyone produced a birth certificate that proves the baby is Sarah Palin’s? I don’t trust anything this woman says.

Posted by: SOC | September 4, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

lol, My little obamites, you need a different attack plan. Attacking poor family members of a candidates family is right from the rush Limbaugh playbook.. But then again, you have managed to erase a fifteen point lead, and now McCain has this supercharged populist from the great north.
wowser, That sure thing you envisioned doesn’t seem so sure anymore, huh soccy?

Posted by: rosco | September 4, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Come on this is the year 2008 – teenagers get pregnant – Palin’s values are her values and just becuase her daughter got pregnant does not mean that she is not telling the truth on her values, it just means that Life happend and she got pregnant. So what if there is an emergancy with the country and her child at the same time – is there not a husband around – what do you do at work if your child gets hurt and your spouse is home?? What do you do if your child is sick and you have older children at home? I have to agree with Cindy McCain would you be acting this way if Palin was a man – nope you would not – did you listen to her tonight speak – why do you assume she can not be VP since she was in Alaska – did she not make changes for the better, did she not reduce waste?? Small town or large town she got the job done and done well so what is the issue here?? Stop listening to the talk shows and celebs and look at the choices you have – lets see a man who has ties to Iraq or a women who was in charge of Alaska – well I dont think that is a hard choice ties to Iraq in the white house – NO WAY!!!!

Posted by: Diane | September 4, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

The comments made by women on this blog regarding Sarah’s husband watching the kids at home doesn’t make a bit of sense. If he stayed home and watched the kids while his wife was off in the White House, I don’t think he would be able to work at the same time. Or doesn’t ‘he’ count? Shall we uncover your true identities as being ‘sexist’? Oh, but wait a minute, that only works for you and not your husbands. Can you spell hypocrit?
Some, not all women are dumber than a cat trying to lay down in a room full of old men/women in rocking chairs.
A bit of history, that women today don’t know (due to a lack of ‘true’ history in modern schools). I’m not going to say that a “women’s place is in the kitchen”. I’m merely pointing out
that “Women’s Lib” wasn’t the idea of women. It was planned and funded by elite groups such as the Rockefeller Foundation so the cabal could tax more people and break up the family.
Here’s a quote from an interview “… Rockefeller asked Russo what he thought women’s liberation was about. Russo’s response that he thought it was about the right to work and receive equal pay as men, just as they had won the right to vote, caused Rockefeller to laughingly retort, ‘You’re an idiot! Let me tell you what that was about, we the Rockefellers funded that, we funded women’s lib, we’re the ones who got all of the newspapers and television – the Rockefeller Foundation.’
Rockefeller told Russo of two primary reasons why the elite bankrolled women’s lib, one because before women’s lib the bankers couldn’t tax half the population (the women staying at home) and two because it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model.”
I won’t bore you with any other remarks, but please, don’t look at the ‘men’ as the bad guys, because women were the ones who were brainwashed. All that time, men were hard at work while women marched. After all, we men still had to bring home the bacon. Didn’t we?
Don’t believe me, but please do your research on the subject. All the facts are there.
Many times, I have praised my beautiful wife for the hard work she has done at home while I went to work. This is the true meaning of ‘Family Values’, what is yours?

Posted by: germanguy | September 4, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

An example of what I just posted:
Diane | Sep 4, 2008 2:03:46 AM
“Stop listening to the talk shows and celebs and look at the choices you have – lets see a man who has ties to Iraq or a women who was in charge of Alaska – well I dont think that is a hard choice ties to Iraq in the white house – NO WAY!!!!”
Where does she link Obama to Iraq??? Anyone else know what she is talking about? If so, please enlighten me. She sounds like a viewer of O’Reilly’s FOX News.

Posted by: german guy | September 4, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

right on geerman guy……. i wholely agree with what you are saying….rock on brother

Posted by: BUDDY | September 4, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am

Great speech, yes it was. Obama, great speech yes it was. I just want to know if the rumors are true before Nov 4th. if she has excepted dirty money, As for the baby, let that go. Leave the kids out. Power to fire anyone she can. Were these decisions made out of a power judgement? I have not decided who to vote for. As for Obama, what’s this about Iraq….?

Posted by: meme | September 4, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

You are all jackasses on this site. clearly left leaning coolaid drinkers. Drink on liberal fools. Ya bunch of idiots!!!

Posted by: haveabrain | September 4, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

this proves it. i guess most of us do get our ‘news’ from the covers of liberal agenda magazines that try and pretend there actually reporting. well maybe not most of every one but at least most of you on here who are to unwilling to do a little homework and use a little bit of your brains to actually question something you see. having a disabled child and/or a daughter with a child even if she is only 17 is hardly a scandal. and again, what were the lies. if this had been a mccain supporter’s magazine all you guys would be screaming “oh, Fairness doctrine, we need to get these evil right wing new people more balanced.”
but i am sure it was just coincidence that the magazine’s owner is big contributer to the messiah’s campain.

Posted by: Chris | September 4, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

GOVERNOR PALIN – Some of our current and past Presidents that held governor seats:
President Bush – Govenor of Texas,
Formal President Clinton – Governor of Arkansas,
Ronald Wilson Reagan – Governor of California,
James Earl Carter, Jr.- Governor of Georgia,
Franklin Delano Roosevelt – Governor of New York,
Woodrow Wilson – Governor of New Jersey,
William McKinley – governor of Ohio,
Grover Cleveland – governor of New York
Rutherford Birchard Hayes – governor of Ohio,
Andrew Johnson – governor of Tennessee,
James Knox Polk- governor of Tennessee,
Martin Van Buren – governor of New York.
Andrew Jackson- governor of Florida,
James Monroe – governor of Virginia,
Thomas Jefferson – governor of Virginia,

Posted by: rick22reed | September 4, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Do your readers use spell check? His name is Mc Cain. Not mac cain, just like it is not mac donalds! Debra, are you a woman hater? do you let men abuse you? How dare you condemn a woman for going out and making her own way in the world! Is your life completely dependent upon a man? DO NOT JUDGE A PERSON ON ONE ITEM!!! What a liberal rag mag. I stumbled across your mag while on line. I googled in SH*T and up popped your mag!

Posted by: mark | September 4, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

In the land of total darkness and daylight alcohol use/abuse is common. Stories about no relationships while living in this difficult environment would not be believable. Sara Palin has a college year reputation from classmates as being an available party girl. Her first child was reported to have been born 8 months after marrying Todd, so is this a daughter like mother story? Possible! The McCain campaign has dug a huge for itself with a limited vetting process; sloppy work, poor judgment. This is change American does not need!

Posted by: Lou R | September 5, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

It’s a sad day when readers of Weekly think of that magazine as having any validity in their so called “reporting.” Palin is a great woman, and it’s disgusting that US would put those false headlines across her down syndrome baby. Pretty pathetic. Read the issues people, and learn the fact that Palin and McCain are the real deal!!! VOTE FOR MCCAIN AND PALIN 2008!!!!!!

Posted by: deidre | September 6, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Us Magazine comes from the publisher of Rolling Stone. I am boycotting advertisers of both.

Posted by: Richard Warren | September 6, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

LEAVE GOV. SAHAR ALONE STOP THIS YELLOW NEWS ABOUT HER.

Posted by: GARY GUINAN | September 11, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Good Day. You must not think me necessarily foolish because I am facetious, nor will I consider you necessarily wise because you are grave.
I am from Vietnam and know bad English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: “May, movies lesbian vampire killers dvdscr xvid done.”
With respect :-(, Dior.

Posted by: Dior | June 9, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.