How Transparent Will Palin Be?
GOLDEN, COLO. — "We’re going to make everything more open," Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin said here yesterday, "and more accountable, and more attractive to those who want to serve."
Good government groups have told me that in general, when it comes to transparency issues, they’re very happy with both candidates on the top of the ticket. Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., are both seen as "reformers" by these groups. Sure, there have been glitches here and there (Obama’s broken promises on public financing comes to mind) but in general they see both men as allies.
Enter Gov Palin.
She has a case to make that she’s a maverick.
She has a case to make that she’s a reformer.
But is she a transparency advocate?
“E-mails from the Palin administration are being withheld from the public and the governor is citing executive privilege," reported Alaska TV station KTUU last month. "With subject lines like ‘Fagan,’ ‘Andrew Halcro’ and even ‘Alaska Ear,’ it makes some wonder how those topics could possibly be policy related; especially since those same e-mails were copied to the governor’s husband…Officials say the private e-mails within the Palin administration won’t be released.”
“Palin routinely uses a private Yahoo e-mail account to conduct state business," the Anchorage Daily News reported a few days ago. "Others in the governor’s office sometimes use personal e-mail accounts too. The practice raises questions about backdoor secrecy in an administration that vowed during the 2006 campaign to be ‘open and transparent.’…
"Where you’ve got a governor apparently using a Yahoo account for state business, that’s kind of a complete inversion of what ought to be happening in terms of public records,’ said Charles Davis, executive director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition and a Missouri journalism associate professor. ‘E-mail that’s public business ought to be done on public accounts that can become public record,’ he said.”
Using a personal email account to conduct official business is what officials of the Bush administration — perhaps most notoriously Karl Rove — in an apparent attempt to circumvent any subpoenas.
Is following that model "transparent"?
In December 2006, newly-elected Gov. Palin and Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell, Department of Revenue Commissioner Patrick Galvin and acting Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Marty Rutherford met with three oil producers to discuss the new gas pipeline. The previous governor, Frank Murkowski, had negotiated a deal with BP, Conoco Phillips and Exxon Mobil, though the plan had never been ratified by the Legislature. Palin said her new administration would open up the process to other companies.
Wrote the Anchorage Daily News, "Palin promised her pipeline contract negotiations would be open and transparent — although the meetings starting today won’t be…"
"Interviews show that Ms. Palin runs an administration that puts a premium on loyalty and secrecy," reported the New York Times this month. "The governor and her top officials sometimes use personal e-mail accounts for state business; dozens of e-mail messages obtained by The New York Times show that her staff members studied whether that could allow them to circumvent subpoenas seeking public records.”
When Palin started as mayor in Wasilla in 1996, she was similarly criticized.
“She’s also been criticized by the local semiweekly newspaper for a new policy requiring department heads to get the mayor’s approval before talking to reporters," the Anchorage Daily News noted. "An editorial in The Frontiersman labeled it a ‘gag order.’ Palin said it’s a temporary rule to smooth the way until department heads have a better sense of the administration’s policies.”
The accumulation of all these actions would undermine how transparent and open Palin’s instincts are.
And I suppose it goes without saying that Palin was introduced to the public 18 days ago and has yet to hold a press conference.
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
She won’t take questions from the press and her last interview before the debate may be Bund Leader Sean Hannity.
Everything the McCain campaign has told us about her has been a lie or an exaggeration.
She’s a fraud, manufactured by Republicans.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
it does occur to me that she’s running for vice president and not prom queen. pardon the slam, jake, but she’s got, what 49 days to try to help bring over colorado, ohio and pennsylvania. after she hits the white house, i’m sure she’ll invite you and the press corps over for tea. ;0)
Posted by: kelli | September 16, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Cronyism? Abuse of office? Claims of executive privilege to cover her ass? Over-confidence based in her belief that God is steering her career?
Ladies and gentlemen, it’s George W Palin.
Will she bring back Gonzo and Brownie? Or her own gaggle of woefully underqualified Alaskan cronies?
Posted by: BBpd | September 16, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
“She’s a fraud, manufactured by Republicans.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
this pick showcases mccains mental state
where once he said his pick could possibly be the most important vp pick of any president because of his age and his bouts with cancer
and then he goes and picks someone with zero experience all for a political stunt..
no longer running on experience he wants to run on change
flip flop cant even stay on message in his own campaign
cant even follow his own words
mccain isnt a man of integrity he is a man of desperation he wants to be president
he will win this election even if it costs him his character
maverick? lol yea right, more like toy soldier
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 16, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Who cares she lies and has from the start.She will pick her time and she said so and that is what she is doing and done so far.She has much to hide and McCain was a fool to think he could ride the skirts of a jerk in to the White House…
Posted by: scared American | September 16, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Carly Fiorina, a key surrogate for John McCain on economic issues, said on Tuesday that Sarah Palin does not have the experience needed to run a major company like the one that Fiorina formerly headed.
“Do you think [Sarah Palin] has the experience to run a major company, like Hewlett Packard?” asked the host.
“No, I don’t,” responded Fiorina.
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 16, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Palin is real. Obama is a hoax – courtesy of the DNC and the DC socialists.
Posted by: dl | September 16, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The only way most Americans can get access to candidates is through the press and it’s questions. It’s up to the candidates to appear and up to us to judge whether the questions are fair.
Posted by: SET | September 16, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Bhrandon
Don’t you have something important to say — like “What in the hell happened to the Cardinals”?
Posted by: dl | September 16, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Sarah W. Bush is another phony Repub spokesmannikin for BIG OIL.
SO MUCH FOR TRANSPARENCY.
SO MUCH FOR HONESTY.
SO MUCH FOR “STRAIGHT TALK”.
DISHONESTY FIRST!!
COUNTRY CLUB FIRST!!
McBUSH/PALBUSH 08!!
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 16, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
If Sarah Palin’s mayoral and gubernatorial management and lawyers emphasized to her what “open government” is about and she disregarded it, then shame on her. If they didn’t clue her in to it, were they stupid or were they intimidated? I can’t believe there aren’t enough gadflies in Alaska to scream their heads off about this and get the secrecy out of her government.
Posted by: Colorado Dem | September 16, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
If she is such a lightweight why is Obama following her around instead of following McCain
Posted by: smith | September 16, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Lets not forget she’s decided she WON’T cooperate with the authorities on “trooper-gate”.
If she has nothing hide then why won’t she cooperate w/ the investigation?
McCain wants to know why his numbers are starting to fall… look no further then Palin.
We’re learning more and more about her record and from the pollings… voters are taking a second look.
She will have alot to answer during the VP debate. Earmarks, bridge to nowhere, foreign policy, taxes, reform…….
what she’s going to reform…
I can’t wait.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 16, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
And I suppose it goes without saying that Palin was introduced to the public 18 days ago and has yet to hold a press conference.
so America let’s blindly get behind her inner circle of cabinet classmates
Posted by: watching | September 16, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
“Palin is real. Obama is a hoax – courtesy of the DNC and the DC socialists.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Not only is this a blatant example of non-transparency, it’s a good example of internet stupidity. Who in their right mind would use a Yahoo account of all things to take care of important government matters? She doesn’t want the press or the public to see what she’s doing, so she decides to use a public e-mail account that could be easily hacked into or destroyed altogether.
Although it does beg the question about what her yahoo address might be…
Posted by: Rob | September 16, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Never in my wildest dreams could I have imagined this many straw horses
Posted by: smith | September 16, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
“If she has nothing hide then why won’t she cooperate w/ the investigation?”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
David Brooks, conservative NYT columnist, officially joined the rush to jump OFF the Palin bandwagon this morning.
HE SAYS SHE’S NOT QUALIFIED.
EVEN CONSERVATIVES AGREE: LOOSE CANNON McCAIN SHOT HIMSELF IN THE FOOT.
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 16, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
This pick will definitely backfire on McCain. The hype is gone and the American people want and deserve answers from Palin.
If she would’ve just told the truth this wouldn’t matter. She’s going to embarass herself during the VP debate in front of MILLIONS.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 16, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Her government operation used the same trick of conducting business on “private” emails to get around open records law which was a favorite trick of the Bush administration (along with losing emails) in order to avoid leaving a trail. What does appear from her mayoral and governmental appointments is a control freak obsessed with personal ambition and choosing cronyism over competence. She’s even more of a third term of Bush Cheney than McCain is.
Posted by: bhciapol | September 16, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I am Sarah and I will not cooperate with troopergate investigation..
Posted by: james | September 16, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
I guess celebrity VP’s don’t hold press conferences.
Posted by: Gus | September 16, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
There is just something not right about her. I wonder if everything will come out before the election and the American people will be fooled into thinking she is someone she isn’t. Why would they use a Yahoo account for emails? What are they hiding?
Posted by: perplexed | September 16, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
“She’s going to embarass herself during the VP debate in front of MILLIONS.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
“Because it’s a partisan deal involving bad cops and bad “Democrats”?”
Okay let them be the bad cops. If there’s nothing there for them to prove then there shouldn’t be a problem.
Unless there is something there. Unless she did abuse her power as a govenor.
This only makes her look the more guilty because she’s hiding.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 16, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
She governs just like the Bush Administration while speechifying about how transparent and open she is.
Alarm bells are going off in my head. Make them stop.
Posted by: Mary | September 16, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
“Okay let them be the bad cops.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Did you just watch Obama’s speech in Colorado on the economy? He completely skewered McCain! Obama is going to win.
Posted by: sarah | September 16, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
And may we please see emails between Obama and Rezko, Obama and Ayers, and Obama and the rest of his “fundraisers?”
Posted by: SandyB | September 16, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
WHY DID OPRAH WINFREY LEAVE TRINTY CHURCH BUT OBAMA DID SO ONLY AFTER PRESSURE FROM THE MEDIA?
Newsweek May 2008
For any spiritually minded, up-wardly mobile African-American living in Chicago in the mid-1980s, the Trinity United Church of Christ was—and still is—the place to be. That’s what drew Oprah Winfrey, a recent Chicago transplant, to the church in 1984. She was eager to bond with the movers and shakers in her new hometown’s black community. But she also admired Trinity United’s ambitious outreach work with the poor, and she took pride in upholding her Southern grandmother’s legacy of involvement with traditional African-American houses of worship. Winfrey was a member of Trinity United from 1984 to 1986, and she continued to attend off and on into the early to the mid-1990s. But then she stopped. A major reason—but by no means the only reason—was the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.
According to two sources, Winfrey was never comfortable with the tone of Wright’s more incendiary sermons, which she knew had the power to damage her standing as America’s favorite daytime talk-show host. “
Posted by: Concerned in IL | September 16, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
These alarm signals about her is not something we should take lightly.
Posted by: Peace | September 16, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Are you kidding? McCain is a transparency advocate? He won’t release his medical records, he won’t release his military records, he and Cindy file tax returns separately to hide her income, his staff won’t let Palin hold a press conference, they won’t let her cooperate with Troopergate investigators and he did everything he could to hide Cindy’s addiction. You want to support McCain, fine. But don’t push the lie that he’s for transparency in government.
Posted by: Jude | September 16, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Palin is the “usual” neo-con, all lies and deceit, why do you think McCain picked her? He’s betting that she’ll confuse the masses and take the heat off him until the election. Remember the public is stupid, they elected Bush, TWICE. The republicans base their campaigns on the gullibility of the American people and they are rarely wrong.
Posted by: JR | September 16, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
That doesn’t mean they’re “socialists” — far FROM it: they’re mobsters on the make.
Posted by: Belle Starr
******************************************* OH wow, you guys got some new talking points that you are allowed to say now.
Posted by: Truth Matters | September 16, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
The difference between Obama and Rezo, and Palin are unbelievable. Palin pledged in her campaign to become governor to have a “transparent” administration, then almost immediately broke the ethics rules by hiding everything behind “personal” emails. Trying to compare that to public conversations Obama had with anyone is ludicrous. Palin is a manufactured candidate that the Republicans was never vetted and not the Republicans are trying to coverup troopergate, library censorship, revenge politics and a host of other unethical practices by the non-maverick governor of Alaska.
Posted by: algwriter | September 16, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
The McCain campaign has finally hit its stride. Some of the current crop of TV campaign and radio ads are out-of-the-park winners and the McCain/Palin stump speeches are on-message, like an ice-pick to the skull. Reduce Taxes, Reduce Spending and Drill Till It Hurts.
Obama is wallowing in a mess of Change-iness and Hope-itude, saddled with a VP pick who is about as inspiring as cold oatmeal. He’s falling into the same trap as the one that sank Kerry, of running against the past Presidential term. We’ve heard nothing new from him for weeks except for desperate reaction to McCain/Palin – and even that is poorly-timed and tone-deaf. Yesterday, he used the expression ‘lipstick on a pig’ to describe McCain/Palin. It’s fine old American turn of phrase – but it looks like a direct personal insult to Governor Palin. Tone-deaf, stupid – whoever scripted this phrase for him needs to go back to leafletting the mall in Galesburg, IL.
It’ll be McCain by 100 EC votes or more. It gives me no joy to say it, and I agree that the wailing that we will hear form Obama will put all previous sore-Democrat-loser events in the shade. But I’ll take it.
Posted by: Concerned in IL | September 16, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
did you hear that faint ‘pop’ that was the Palin bubble.
Posted by: Jason | September 16, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Gosh! the solution is simple. I’ll get my neighbor’s 17 year old computer whiz son to hack into Yahoo and retrieve the emails. I’m surprized Sarah didn’t know how vulnerable a Yahoo email account is. Again, it’s a matter of her judgement being in question.
Posted by: Courtney L. | September 16, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
LIES. LIES and MORE LIES.
Don’t trust that woman at all.
Posted by: HAHA | September 16, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Hey dl – Palin transparent. Do not fallover laughing. If she has nothing to hide then why hide from the press, dodge ins=vestigations and the like. She is not George III, she is Cheney in a skirt and lipstick. RUN PEOPLE RUN.
Posted by: community organizer | September 16, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Josh Marshall at TPM sums it up nicely:
“Jake Tapper observes that Sarah Palin has Karl Rove-like email habits.”
Posted by: Crust | September 16, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
That’s not the reason she’s not cooperating. She’s hiding somethings and before long it will come out.
McCains problem. He didn’t vet her and now he has to deal with it.
She should’ve told the truth. Now her record will be thrown back into her face during the VP debate in front of millions.
What will she say to earmarks? reform?transparency? Bridge to nowhere? foreign policy?
Obama choose Biden b/c he has no controversies floating around. He’s been vetted by both the Obama team and the media.
Palin WASN’T vetted by neither the McCain camp or the media.
He should’ve chosen Romney. Could’ve won Michigan and Dems would’ve been in great trouble.
I said it before and I say it now. McCain gave this election to Obama when he choose Palin.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 16, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Both McCain and Palin are pushing messages and themes that dramatically contradict their records. Palin, like Bush, seems to be a freak when it comes to loyalty and secrecy and the need to do harm to those who don’t go along. Now she’s talking about open government and accountability when everything about her speaks to the opposite. What Phoniness. Are the American people going to buy this Alaska sized pile of reindeer dung?
Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 16, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
With all the lies she tells, I surmise not very.
Posted by: Thinking | September 16, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
You McCain maniacs and Palin “Stepford Wives” are scary. Do you just make up these tales on your own and then call them facts or do ya’ll have script. I was a huge McCain supporter in 2000 and 2004 but there’s been an invasion of the body snatchers or something happened because he is 180 degrees of who he was. And Palin? Please!
Posted by: CMSgt Gary Preston | September 16, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Sarah, Paris and Brittney are Almost similar. The only difference is Paris and Brittney are more honest.
Posted by: Y | September 16, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Well, you guys don’t get to have it both ways………
On the one hand, you belittle Palin as the Moose-Hunter, Caribou Barbie, the foreign policy neophyte, and ignorant hillbilly…
And now all of a sudden she’s credited with being on the same cover-up sophistication level with Karl Rove, and the Watergate conspirators.
How about somebody do a little delving into Obama’s troop withdrawal meddling in Iraq?
I think that’s a little more important, and it certainly worries me more than this.
Posted by: SandyB | September 16, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Star Belle,
You sound like some fringe conspiracy theorist. Next this you know you’ll be telling us about how Palin is a gift from the alien races on Mars (jk).
Seriously, that Obama is a socialist line is rediculous. Unfortunately, Sarah Palin is looking more and more like a Fascist. The point is when “we” make radical statements like these “we” lose our credibility on frums like this one. Try coming with a real argument next time.
Posted by: Independant Woman, Texas | September 16, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
If Governor Palin wants “transparency,” this voter would like her to start the investigation of her in her home state. This bi-oartisan investigation started well before she was named the Republican VP nominee. Forgetting the hockey mom / pandering to the white voters who were desperate for a reason to vote against Obama and McCain was a completely uncompelling candidate / sitcom appeal – is this an ethical capable politician? I vote no. As a white midwestern woman, I am an Obama supporter. But had McCain chose a minimally qualified VP pick, I would have respected him.
Posted by: ModerateMom | September 16, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Yeah Belle just what we need a first Dude. This woman is very shady and dishonest. She has a few great lines but there is nothing underneath the perfect makeup and designer glasses. Sorry ladies she aint no Hillary CLinton.
Posted by: community organizer | September 16, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Vanessa,
There’s an old saying that its not the crime but the cover up that gets you in politics.
The picture painted so far is not pretty.
Republican efforts to delay the probe until after the Nov. 4 election were thwarted when GOP State Sen. Charlie Huggins, who represents Palin’s hometown of Wasilla, sided with Democrats. “Let’s just get the facts on the table,” said Huggins, who appeared in camouflage pants to vote during a break from moose hunting.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
“And now all of a sudden she’s credited with being on the same cover-up sophistication level with Karl Rove, and the Watergate conspirators.”
No, she is merely an end product of the sophistication level of Rove much like Bush was.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Does Obama have any ex-girlfriends? His story looks as if he was a virgin when he met Michelle. That is odd no ex-girlfriends praising him or bashing him, Only this Larry Sinclair an a homosexual incident and cocaine in the back of a limo.
Posted by: Concerned in IL | September 16, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Palin lied to Charlie Gibson
“There’s nothing to hide,” she said in an interview with ABC’s Charles Gibson. “Commissioner Monegan has said, ‘The governor never asked me to fire him, the governor’s husband never asked me to fire him,’ and we never did. I never pressured him to hire or fire anybody.”
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Palin’s luster is wearing off, you can tell how the republicans are starting to run scared again because most of the republicans’ comments have nothing to do with the issue at hand; they are trying to rehash old issues AGAIN.
If Palin is going to be so transparent, why doesn’t she start with the campaign?
Posted by: The Unshrub | September 16, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Eight years ago the USA was the world’s unquestioned superpower, leader in technical innovation, beacon of democracy, civil rights and the rule of law.
Then the Republicans finally got control of all branches of government.
And now? People are seriously thinking of voting in the Republicans AGAIN?
Posted by: Bullsmith | September 16, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
“Seriously, that Obama is a socialist line is rediculous.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Her nutjob fundie fans will overlook this and all of her other warts, flaws and misdeeds BECAUSE SHE’S ONE OF THEM!
Posted by: TruthTeller | September 16, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Another non story on Palin….her state spending account all on line for everyone to see…..this is not a story that anyone cares about.
How about Obama and his ties to Bill Ayers….just how deep did they go….let’s look into that. And Wright…someone take the gag out of his mouth as we all know he was threatened to stay silent.
Palin email story……not a problem.
McCAIN/PALIN ’08
Posted by: Debra | September 16, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
First time I have ever posted. I am an independent now. Was a republican, but just changed because of this type of hate. There is no place for a moderate in the republican party. Will now vote Obama Biden
Posted by: Jim | September 16, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Poor poor Barry, all that money and he can’t get the white vote. Luckily 96% of blacks are voting for him in order to steal the election.
Posted by: Brad | September 16, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
She and McCain will be as transparent as Bush and Cheney have been. If that’s what you want America, they’re your choice. As for me (and I pray millions and millions more Americans) I choose change for the better. Obama/Biden ’08!!
Posted by: realitycheck | September 16, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
jim, let me guess, you were clinging to your guns and religion and now you’re not. Lame, lame, lame!
Posted by: Kyle | September 16, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I admit to not being as smart as the rest of you guys. I’m not concerned with the personalities of these candidates, I’m concerned with who seems to be more concerned with the issues facing most Americans right now. High gas prices, the rising cost of education, our economy going in the toilet, our involvement in this questionable war. Most people vote along party lines, I tend to vote for the lesser of the 2 evils. How someone can honestly say that McCain/Palin is a better choice than Obama/Biden is beyond me. The question of this election is this, are Americans frustrated enough with the current state of affairs that they can overcome their fear of voting for a black man for POTUS? Let’s face it, this is something this country has never had to face in its 232 year history, the possibility of a black President, & it’s scaring the hell out of some people. But Obama is the best person for the job right now, of what we have to choose from. The alternative is a ticket who will continue the course in Iraq, a ticket with a VP candidate we don’t know anything about & her party doesn’t want us to know. Coming from a person who really doesn’t have a dog in the fight, the possibility of McCain/Palin should scare the hell out of everyone. The fact that the GOP thought that Sarah Palin would ensure them of the female vote is insulting. I think the women of America are far more intelligent than the GOP thinks they are. I’m not into politics & I can’t wait until this mess is over. Unless something of epic proportions comes out on Obama or Biden, the lesser of 2 evils in ’08 are the Democrats.
Posted by: Dee Tee Gee | September 16, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Concerned in IL
Nothing like spreading a little sleaze around.
Posted by: The Unshrub | September 16, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Here’s another gaffe from a McCain staffer:
Carly Fiorina, a key surrogate for John McCain on economic issues, said on Tuesday that Sarah Palin does not have the experience needed to run a major company like the one that Fiorina formerly headed.
“Do you think [Sarah Palin] has the experience to run a major company, like Hewlett Packard?” asked the host.
“No, I don’t,” responded Fiorina. “But you know what? That’s not what she’s running for.”
Oh how true Ms. Fiorina, she’s only running to be a heartbeat away from CEO of the Free World, what would experience and knowledge have to do with it?
Posted by: The Other Ed | September 16, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
she passes the only test neocons care about.. guns babies bibles
Posted by: Gus | September 16, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
The Palin response to troopergate?
Not cooperation with the bipartisan commission as she promised.
Nope.
Her campaign is handing out talking points attacking Monegan to press, so far only the dutiful right wingers have carried the water.
This woman is the kind of sleazy politician worthy of the Bush legacy.
No wonder McCain picked her.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Does anyone else think it sets a frightening precedent for the campaign to deny access to the candidate by the press? If this works, and we elect McCain / Palin, it seems likely that this type of behavior will continue into future campaigns. In the United States of America, why isn’t there uniform public outrage about a candidate that refuses to answer questions? Palin supporters are ardent about eh second ammendment, but not troubled by this insult to the first?
Posted by: AZ Sundevil | September 16, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Sarah says something different from her records. She is a phatologic liar. Can people not see the pattern? Or there are just stupid.
Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 16, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Barack Obama is the most anti-gun presidential candidate in American history.
He has voted to ban some shotguns and hunting rifles.
He supports government regulation of guns. BO wants gov’t to control everything.
What he says on the campaign trail does not match his voting record.
NRA gives Obama a grade “F”.
Posted by: sally | September 16, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Looks like what goes up must come down.
Palin is starting to show her true colors.
Posted by: NoSarahPalin | September 16, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
In Alaska news papers they are laughing at here statement. They know her better then anyone else. She is hiding not only from the press, but what she had done as governor.
Nice lie Palin.
Posted by: Mrs Ethel | September 16, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Obama and Biden voted for the Bridge to Nowhere.
Voted NO to an amendment to divert funds to Katrina relief.
Great judgement.
Posted by: harry | September 16, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
“Obama and Biden voted for the Bridge to Nowhere.”
Yes they did as part of voting for a larger budget. And they never lied about that. Palin however has lied about her involvement and support for the Bridge to Nowhere.
“Voted NO to an amendment to divert funds to Katrina relief.”
Actually no. The Coburn amendment was mostly about restructuring Amtrak and part of that dealt with rebuilding rail lines in the Katrina area. The amendment had other problems though and was voted down by 80 Senators in addition to Biden and Obama.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
mccain sure has shown a lack of judgment these last couple of weeks
he is proving why he cant be trusted with the presidency.
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 16, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
I’m still waiting for the MSM to address Obama’s attempt to get the Iraqi Government to not call for a draw down in troops until after the elections, bordering on Treason, Two days and counting. I’m still waiting. I can’t hear anything else until they address this issue. I don’t care what amount of trash they put out here. I want them to do their jobs on this one.
Posted by: Kim | September 16, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Concerned is now relegated to repeating stupid conspiracy theories.
Its really kind of sad.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
The bounce that mccain/palin have experienced started downward now that the country is in a financial crisis. We certainly don’t want someone that doesn’t understand politics in the White House at this point. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | September 16, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
“I can’t hear anything else until they address this issue.”
Kim,
Obama did address the issue.
His campaign called out Amir Taheri for the liar he is.
Your problem is that you trust news sources that lie to you on a regular basis.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
“Barack Obama is the most anti-gun presidential candidate in American history.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
This is not, generally, the message you want to send as the financial markets collapse and the country’s economic concerns are at the forefront of the political dialogue.
On Monday, Sarah Palin hosted a major fundraiser on behalf of John McCain in Canton, Ohio. The event, which raised $1 million, was organized by W.J. “Tim” Timken Jr., a major Republican figure in the state and mega-donor to George W. Bush.
Timken, additionally, is a toxic figure within Ohio’s working class community. His company, Timken Co — one of the largest manufacturers of tapered roller and needle bearings in the country — is responsible for massive job losses in one of the hardest economically hit areas in the United States: Stark County, Ohio.
there ya go more of the same
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 16, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Ask her about the $40,000+ tanning bed she had the tax payers pay for. And by tax payers I mea you and me because Alaska gets its revenue from federal money given to it and oil
Posted by: Real republican | September 16, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Palin didn’t learn much from history did she?
It’s not so much the crime, but the cover-up that hurts you.
If you have nothing to hide, best to cooperate or else it looks like you are hiding something.
I mean if Sarah Palin can’t ask questions about local issues, how can we expect her to handle Putin???
Every day she stonewalls looks worse for her in the long term.
Posted by: Beautiful Burnout | September 16, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Over at Daily Kos, it’s been revealed Sarah Palin is directly involved in charging rape victims for their forensic analysis kits. And one of the reasons involved is that she is so anti-abortion, she didn’t want the victims to know if they had been impregnated.
Carly Fiorina, who just yesterday said the SNL impersonation by Tina Fey is sexist, said on MSNBC that Sarah Palin does not have ‘enough’ experience to run a company like Hewlett-Packard (which Fiorina ran) but ‘that’s not what she’s running for.’
So the transparency issue is a big problem. What is she running for, and why won’t she talk to the media about it unless it’s a big secret?
Overturning Roe v. Wade? Making every woman in America pay for her ‘rape kit’?
What is Sarah Palin being so secretive about?
Posted by: kravitz | September 16, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The bounce that mccain/palin have experienced started downward now that the country is in a financial crisis. We certainly don’t want someone that doesn’t understand ECONOMICS in the White House at this point. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | September 16, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Maybe the Republicans should change their mascot to an ostrich. Debra, how could you say the fact Mrs. “I am going to have a transpearant administration” is now hiding emails? Emails that are about government business. Enron’s books were published every year, which is required for public companies, and look how they cooked the books. If you are going to be transpear, that should mean everything.
Obama has answered questions about Ayers, and answered them again on O’Reilly. Palin is refusing to participate in an investigation she had originally agreed to cooperate with. And she never takes questions from the press.
You don’t see a problem with the Palin duplicity and McCain says the economy is fundunmentally strong…is hiding from real problems a character trait of republicans?
Posted by: Mack | September 16, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Go find Obama’s records when he was in the State Senate – Obama won’t release them or they are “missing”.
Where are grades and class lists from the 3 colleges Obama attended? He won’t release them.
Where are the records of his community organizing activities? He won’t release them.
Why aren’t you as concerned about Obama’s e-mails as you are Palins?
Where are the records of Obama’s working with Ayers and Rezko – he won’t release them….or they are hidden away.
Posted by: Zank | September 16, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Brad,
Getting 96% of a particular ethnic group’s vote does not constitute theft of an election in my book. Now rigging electronic voting machines to flip votes, ballot boxes that suddenly come up missing in a state where a candidate’s brother is the governor, and minority voters getting turned away at their polling locations by workers who assumed they knew who these people were going to vote for, THAT’S THEFT my friend. And with the black population in this country being at only 12-13%,is it really that big of a difference maker? Besides, the Republicans obviously could care less about the black vote seeing as that they’ve done absolutely nothing to get it. Do you really believe that Obama doesn’t have quite a bit of the white vote? How did he get this far if he didn’t? You sound like a hater, Brad. Don’t hate, appreciate!
Posted by: Dee Tee Gee | September 16, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
“or advocating military escalation in Afghanistan”
Yeah the only people calling for that are the generals like Petreaus.
Obama has been calling for troops in Afghanistan to go after the Taliban and Al Queda. Imagine that going after the people who were directly involved in attacking us on 9/11.
John McCain said the war in Afghanistan was over 3 years ago.
McCain…wrong again.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Palin lying on the stump today
And although Palin has often resisted disclosing internal government deliberations as governor, she said the fact that she was not a member of the “Washington elite” enhanced her commitment to making the federal government more transparent. “We’re going to make everything more open, though, and more accountable, and more attractive to those who want to serve,” she said.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Hey riley, thanks for conceding that Obama will be the next president.
Posted by: Beautiful Burnout | September 16, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Obama is an idiot. Period.
But fear not my friends, we shall not elect him. America ain’t quite that stupid. Thank God for the Independents like me who will make the difference.
Independents who could not vote during the primary. Obama’s worst nightmare.
Posted by: Concerned in IL | September 16, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
I feel sorry for the few partisan hacks that are still blindly defending this sham of a VP pick that was foisted upon them.
Intellectual conservatives, libertarian-leaning conservatives and good government conservatives see this cynical and crass pick for exactly what is is.
Country first, huh?
Posted by: Steve | September 16, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Obamaland in total meltdown. States polls inducing mass hysteria. don’t drink the kool-aid
Posted by: geevill | September 16, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Please make this stop. If you notice, republicans and conservatives are unable to respond to questions about Palin without asking questions about someone else in return (Obama, the person posing the question, etc.). We are really abandoning our principles this year with McCain’s nomination and his truly disastrous candidacy, not to mention this Palin concept.
McCain does not have the integrity, character and judgment to lead our nation at this time. As a republican, I used to just disagree with him on a couple of issues, but at least I knew where he stood. Now, he is a farce and should be exposed as such.
Posted by: Florida Republican | September 16, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Obama Brags About Logan Act Medding In June
It’s not just Amir Taheri pushing the Logan Act story. In June of this year, before he ever went to Iraq, Obama’s bragging about his meddling in U.S. foreign policy made the pages of the NY Times:
Among the issues being discussed with the two presidential candidates is the long-term security accord between Iraq and the United States. While the Bush administration would like to see an agreement reached before the summer’s political conventions, Mr. Obama said today that he opposed such a timetable.
It seems The One had already commenced unsanctioned telephone negotiations with Iraqi Foreign Minister Zebari. His goal was to prevent the White House from successfully concluding negotiations for a long term security agreement with Iraq. Bizarrely, Obama openly admits what he was doing:
“My concern is that the Bush administration, in a weakened state politically, ends up trying to rush an agreement that in some ways might be binding to the next administration, whether it’s my administration or Senator McCain’s administration,” Mr. Obama said. “The foreign minister agreed that the next administration should not be bound by an agreement that’s currently made.”
Now *that’s* real audacity – using your own illegal acts as the pretext for undermining your own government’s foreign policy!
Posted by: Concerned in IL | September 16, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Obama’s kind of community organizing:
voter fraud/ACORN
Posted by: harry | September 16, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“local semi-weekly newspaper”????
The town I live in has a media spokesperson as do most companies. Whats wrong with other towns having media spokespeople
Semi Weekly, thats usually the paper that the local gossip runs, jperhaps not a really good source
oops I got it!!this was satire
Posted by: smith | September 16, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Who cares if she does a press conference for the media, she is out there every day talking to AMERICANS, the voters, that’s what she should be doing, talking to the media is a waste of time, it’s obvious most of you have made up your own minds anyway and would never be as tough on Obama as Palin
Posted by: Cee | September 16, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Breaking news that Biden may be out as the VP pick! Stay tuned!
Posted by: Harry | September 16, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
How transparent will Obama be?
where are his senate records that he clamied he lost.
Posted by: amy | September 16, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
“Breaking news that Biden may be out as the VP pick! Stay tuned”
Why stay tuned? Biden was nominated and must stay on the ballot.
Posted by: geevill | September 16, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
“she is out there every day talking to AMERICANS, the voters, that’s what she should be doing”
Cee,
If she was taking question from voters I would be all for it.
But making speeches is not talking to the American people, its talking at them.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
American Research Group has McCain now up by 3% in the latest poll. Start the countdown to an Obama meltdown. 10 9 8 7 ……..
Posted by: Nobama | September 16, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Obama responded by essentially confirming Taheri’s account. It wasn’t enough for Obama to fail at forcing the nation into a defeat in Iraq when he opposed the surge. Now he has interfered with our efforts to stabilize Iraq and provide for its security after the surge succeeded in keeping Iraq from falling into a failed state. And when he got caught working for failure and defeat, he tried making it into a smear against John McCain.
That’s not leadership America needs from a Senator, let alone a President. The Senate should investigate this as a gross violation of the Constitution and the separation of powers between the branches of government.
Posted by: Concerned in IL | September 16, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Bush was a “maverick” too.
Enough.
Palin is a joke. A bad joke.
McCain is a fossil. And incompetent fossil who doesn’t know anything about the economy and who hired Phil Gramm to be his guru… the guy who deregulated the mortgage industry in the first place.
Posted by: James | September 16, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
I’m still awaiting the MSM to report on Obama’s Treason. Trying to talk the Iraqi Government into stalling draw downs until after the elections. Two days and counting. I am still waiting.
Posted by: Kim | September 16, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
The Palin fad is coming apart at the seams, thanks to her continued bald-faced lying. Her Fav/Unfav ratings are now only +1, down massively over a very short time.
I can’t understand why she keeps this up – she admitted to Charlie Gibson that her “thanks but no thanks” on the bridge was false. Then she went back out a couple of days later and said it again. Incredible. What a fraud.
If she can’t handle a press conference, how could she handle Putin? For crying out loud, Obama had the stones to go on O’Reilly.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 16, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
She really does look like a Bush protege doesn’t she?
Posted by: Steve V | September 16, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Tungsten: speaking of “frauds”, imagine you had “publicly proven plagiarist” on your resume. Do you think you she be entitled to by VP of the U.S. Wow–what hubris.
This is not newsworthy since it calls into question the integrity and intelligence of a Democratic candidate (no response expected): In an article entitled “Biden’s Belly Flop”, Newsweek printed Joe Biden’s yearbook picture from his college days and a copy of his law school transcripts with the big “F” in his transcripts circled. Biden was given a chance to repeat his legal methods course, and above the “F” his retake grade of 80% was eventually penciled in. Being a repeat offender when it came to plagiarism made things much, much worse for Biden than they might have been otherwise in his failed bid for the Democratic presidential ticket in 1987.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 16, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
The truth is Mr. Obama is MORE like Bush in 2000 than McCain is. Like Bush in 2000, Obama is untested but popular. Swing voters like me are hesitant of putting in another unknown, and the closer we get to November, the more leery independents are gonna get. Obama doesn’t can’t acknowledge that he has any fundamental flaws. Not acknowledging the problem, proves he has it.
Posted by: Concerned in IL | September 16, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?
Until BO sent his snoops to search the Alaskan slopes, Palin rated higher than 80 percent in satisfied citizenry.
And now, all of a sudden, she has become the worst person in the political arena!
First Obama=buddies accused her of having pretended to have Trig which, supposedely had been birthed by her daughter.
Then when THAT record had been righted and it was discovered that her daughter was pregnantand unmarried, you accused her of being a rotten mother.
You bark at her for not holding press conferences, disremembering her on-air conversations on channel 7 as long ago as….. late last week!
…and her appearance in Nevada as recently as Sunday!
If you are looking for anything which has negatively affected her governing her state, I don’t think you’ll find it.
If you’re looking for pissante stuff like troopergate, no one got fired, the trooper is still working…. and it’s YOUR campaign dollars which are being wasted!
And…if you’re R E A L L Y looking for “mud”, you don’t have to travel to Alaska.
You could try Illinois; it’s closer, and it definitely hasn’t been nit-picked!
Posted by: eyes wide open | September 16, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
In a statement issued in July, Palin heatedly denied illegally accessing her ex-brother-in-law’s personnel files and posted two documents on the governor’s Web site, including a release signed by Wooten in February giving his wife’s divorce attorney access to his “entire employment file.”
The posted documents suggested that Palin obtained information about Wooten’s personnel file through the discovery process related to the divorce/custody battle with her sister.
“Any information regarding personnel records came from the trooper himself,” Palin said in her statement.
But the fact that Wooten’s personnel file was released to his ex-wife’s attorney during court proceedings does not mean that Palin’s office then had the right to access the files so it could be used against him, Cyr said.
“Those files were strictly for use during the divorce,” Cyr said. “And it has a sunset provision,” expiring on May 1.
Plus, Cyr said, conducting an investigation of a state trooper’s workers comp situation is “not the job of the governor’s office and that’s exactly what we have been saying. … Why is the governor’s office involved in this trooper’s worker’s compensation claims?”
Cyr said he believes the governor’s office posted documents on her Web site saying state officials were not trying to illegally gain access to Wooten’s files to “inoculate themselves from the fact that they used the resources of the governor’s office to obtain highly confidential information about Trooper Wooten from his personnel file without authorization.”
Two weeks ago, Palin’s office removed the two documents, including Wooten’s release form, from her official Web site.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Here is an analysis by the Washington Times of bipartisanship of McCain and Obama by the numbers not the rhetoric.
This story should be splashed all over the MSM if the MSM was respectable and balanced, but it tells a more true story of bipartisanship so I just happened to get the link from a blog.The whole “same as bush” for McCain and “new kind of politician” are brought back down to earth.
Obama’s 97% party line voting is change? And McCains 85% republican party line voting is same as Bush? This analysis is based off of voting records and bill sponsors so REAL NUMBERS not BS rhetoric.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
During an appearance Friday on ABC’s “The View,” Sen. McCain said Gov. Palin shared his views, and hasn’t sought congressional earmarks. “Not as governor she hasn’t,” he said.
In fact, in the current fiscal year, she is seeking $197 million for 31 projects, the records show. In the prior year, her first year in office, she sought $256 million for dozens more projects ranging from research on rockfish and harbor-seal genetics to rural sanitation and obesity prevention. By comparison, her predecessor, Gov. Frank Murkowski, sought more than $350 million in his last year in office.
The McCain campaign said Sunday that Gov. Palin’s overall record is one of fiscal discipline. “Her record is cutting the number of earmark requests from the previous administration sizably,” said McCain spokesman Tucker Bounds, and she has vetoed wasteful state spending.
As for Sen. McCain’s televised comments on Friday, Mr. Bounds added, “If he gave viewers a mistaken impression, it certainly wasn’t intentional.”
In an interview with ABC News on Friday, Gov. Palin herself suggested she no longer seeks earmarks for her state. “The abuse of earmarks, it’s un-American, it’s undemocratic, and it’s not going to be accepted in a McCain-Palin administration. Earmark abuse will stop.”
When pressed about her record as governor, she said: “We have drastically, drastically reduced our earmark request since I came into office. This is what I’ve been telling Alaskans for these years that I’ve been in office, is no more.”
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“And McCains 85% republican party line voting is same as Bush? This analysis is based off of voting records and bill sponsors so REAL NUMBERS not BS rhetoric.”
John McCain “I voted with Bush 90% of the time”
Are you calling John McCain a liar?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
My gosh, are the comments on these posts always so wildly off-topic and chock-a-block with insane conspiracy theories? Is it too much to ask that people stay at least within sight of reality? Oh, right. It’s the internet.
Anyway, good post, Jake. You make some very important points about Gov. Palin’s email habits. I’d find that kind of behavior suspicious in any candidate.
Posted by: Schuyler T. Colfax | September 16, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
The more I read into Sarah Palin more I get uncomfortable with the notion of this person only a heartbeat away from the Presidency. McCain has shown every bit of bad judgment and temperament in choosing his VP. There is a reason people vet their VP choices. I wonder if there are more republicans out there like me who are disgusted and insulted by McCain’s choice of VP and his campaign antics.
Posted by: Jklein | September 16, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Aides keep reporters well away from her when she is campaigning, and also protect her privacy aboard her chartered campaign plane by pulling a curtain across the center aisle to separate the Palins and her top aides from the rest of the passengers.
Even Palin’s carefully scripted moments can produce puzzlements.
“Too often, the government gets in the way when innovators take on cancer or Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s,” she told an audience in Golden, Colo. One aide suggested later that was a reference to federal earmarks that lawmakers sometimes insert into legislation, but the campaign provided no documentation for the claim.
Then, too, Palin seems to relish repeating claims that make selective use of undisputed facts. She told one audience she said “thanks, but no thanks” to the infamous Bridge to Nowhere” that was intended to link a small Alaska village to its airport on a nearby island.
In reality, she welcomed federal funding for the project until it became a national symbol of wasteful spending.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
I’m still awaiting the MSM to report on Obama’s Treason. Trying to talk the Iraqi Government into stalling draw downs until after the elections. Two days and counting. I am still waiting.
Posted by: K im | September 16, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
And you people wonder why the big shift of women voters to the McCain ticket has occurred??
For the last two weeks, ever since Palin was announced as McCain’s V.P. pick, the media, feminists, and the Obama campaign have been going out of their way to bring her down, look for any little thing to point their fingers at, and then try to say they are not “sexist.”
I’ve got news for all of you, the people who vote in every election, and who vote for the person they think is going to do the best job for THEM, are all of those women who have now decided to vote for McCain.
I don’t think anything you could post here between now and election day would turn their heads.
It still amazes me that NO ONE has done one-tenth of the vetting job on Obama during the last 20 months that everyone is now doing on Sarah Palin…….
Posted by: SandyB | September 16, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
“And McCains 85% republican party line voting is same as Bush? This analysis is based off of voting records and bill sponsors so REAL NUMBERS not BS rhetoric.”
John McCain “I voted with Bush 90% of the time”
Are you calling John McCain a liar?”
They are in the same party so of course a lot of his votes will be the same. However McCain has differed from Bush on several significant things.
How about you go read the article? Or are you blinding yourself to the fact Obama is a party line hack who doesn’t know the meaning of bipartisanship. Sucks whe facts and numbers get in the way of false rhetoric huh.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Aaaagain…Obama’s press availability? Nil. For how long?
Posted by: Wade | September 16, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
” … Gov. Palin’s email habits. I’d find that kind of behavior suspicious in any candidate.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
“I’m still awaiting the MSM to report on Obama’s Treason. Trying to talk the Iraqi Government into stalling draw downs until after the elections. Two days and counting. I am still waiting.
Posted by: K im”
Same here. If that claim is true it is absolutely ridiculous it is not in the MSM. ABC can run smear jobs against Palin but can’t look into a story that shows Obama undermining US diplomacy? If the claim is true it is a matter of HUGE proportions on several levels not to mention potential legal liabilities.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
good job Jake
will we see this anywhere else in the MSM
Posted by: watching | September 16, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
“Aaaagain…Obama’s press availability? Nil. For how long?”
Wade,
Obama held a presser just last week.
Let the AP take it from here.
Unlike Obama, McCain has not held a news conference since accepting his party’s nomination. He hasn’t taken questions from his traveling press corps in more than a month.
Like Obama, he makes himself selectively available to local reporters in particular places where the campaign thinks the access will help his prospects.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
She won’t give a press conference because it would look REAL bad giving a press conference with a teleprompter. But then again, if she did the press would just report how good she was reading off the screen.
Posted by: DMR | September 16, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Palin is just another Republican/Conservative who thinks she is above the law. They should change the name of their party to the ‘No Accountability, It’s not my fault’ party.
Posted by: Jazzman | September 16, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
She won’t give a press conference because it would look REAL bad giving a press conference with a teleprompter. But then again, if she did the press would just report how good she was reading off the screen.
Posted by: DMR | September 16, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
McCain campaign strategy
Lie Baby, Lie!!!
Posted by: Standard Operating Procedure | September 16, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
“Using Yahoo rather than a local system open to local political hanky-panky is a way to AVOID tampering with records.”
Yes she must hide her records from the public lest they be interfered with.
The rationalizations of the right wing mind.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
She won’t give a press conference because it would look REAL bad giving a press conference with a teleprompter. But then again, if she did the press would just report how good she was reading off the screen.
Posted by: DMR | September 16, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
The MSM is concerned about Palin’s tanning bed–but ignores Biden telling voters in NC to vote for Obama because he is black.
The MSM ignores that the Iraqi Prime Minister has accused BO of trying to stall the withdrawal of troops.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 16, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Why would anyone talk about what Amir Taheri has to say. He has had multiple articles retracted from the New York Post for falsifications. He has a book that has been torn to shreds for essentially being made up.
The only people who would pay any attention to Amir Taheri’s claims that Obama tried to slow down troop withdrawals are the tinfoil hat brigade.
Posted by: johnTX | September 16, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
“She won’t give a press conference because it would look REAL bad giving a press conference with a teleprompter. But then again, if she did the press would just report how good she was reading off the screen.
Posted by: DMR ”
LOL. The top of the democratic ticket is still cowering in the corner with his tail between his legs scared to debate McCain in a REAL format so I wouldn’t bring the teleprompter issue into play.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Sarah Palin is a person who has turned on every leader who helped her up the ladder of success. The mayor who got her elected to the City Council found her as an opponent. The Governor who appointed her to chair a state commission found her as an opponent.
Some call her a reformer. Others disloyal. Clearly ambitious. Watch yourself Senator McCain.
Posted by: ricky | September 16, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
“Why would anyone talk about what Amir Taheri has to say. He has had multiple articles retracted from the New York Post for falsifications. He has a book that has been torn to shreds for essentially being made up.
The only people who would pay any attention to Amir Taheri’s claims that Obama tried to slow down troop withdrawals are the tinfoil hat brigade.
Posted by: johnTX”
I haven’t seen any denials from the Iraq officials or US commanders. If it is untrue wouldn’t it be easy to debunk it by asking the NAMED sources. If he was listing unnamed sources that is one thing but he is not.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
So Governor Palin eventually said no the the Bridge To Nowhere but she supports a Bridge To Her Little Home Town In Alaska. I guess that makes her a one-trick pit bull afterall.
So what’s the difference between Sarah Palin and a typical old school porkbarrel politician? Lipstick.
Posted by: Dan R | September 16, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Cryos, no but then Bush never defended himself against allegations that he masterminded 9/11 either. So I guess that must be true too!
Honestly, leaders of countries aren’t in the habit of defending themselves against tinfoil hat conspiracy theories.
Posted by: johnTX | September 16, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Cryos, no but then Bush never defended himself against allegations that he masterminded 9/11 either. So I guess that must be true too!
Honestly, leaders of countries aren’t in the habit of defending themselves against tinfoil hat conspiracy theories.
Posted by: johnTX”
Nice excuse. Obama himself didn’t even deny it and had a campaign staff say “I was in Iraq with Obama and never heard this.” That is a WEAK denial. Maybe there is no story but dismissing something with that sort of significance with easily verifiable sources is ignorant.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Palin said she had nothing to hide about Troopergate. Now she is saying she won’t cooperate with the investigation.
She is power hungry. Watch out McCain!
Posted by: cincyr | September 16, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
McCain-Palin would be BUSH-CHENEY ON STEROIDS.
Posted by: C. Neiman | September 16, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Cryos,
Two things.
One, the truth and nothing resembling the truth has eeked from the pages of the Washing Times.
Two, as an fyi, the blog deletes all links. You can however describe what you are looking at so people can google it.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Cryos, by having Obama directly deny it, it raises the issue’s prominence in the press. This means that a news cycle will be devoted to a smear with the news media repeating the smear over and over and over.
And since this smear is written by someone who has the credibility of Richard Nixon, the mainstream press is correctly ignoring the whole thing. If it had been written by say, the Iraqi government, then someone would have paid attention.
Posted by: johnTX | September 16, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Cryos,
Two things.
One, the truth and nothing resembling the truth has eeked from the pages of the Washing Times.
Two, as an fyi, the blog deletes all links. You can however describe what you are looking at so people can google it.
Posted by: Ryan C”
1. So is “truth” defined only by news sources that are nowhere near center. Does truth just come from the Huffington Post and moveon.org?
2. I can still see the link just fine. I’ll pull out the http since it sounds like you are acting like you can’t read the article. Here ya go just insert the “http://” before it
washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/15/records-show-mccain-more-bipartisan
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
“Cryos, by having Obama directly deny it, it raises the issue’s prominence in the press. This means that a news cycle will be devoted to a smear with the news media repeating the smear over and over and over.
And since this smear is written by someone who has the credibility of Richard Nixon, the mainstream press is correctly ignoring the whole thing. If it had been written by say, the Iraqi government, then someone would have paid attention..”
Yeah that is the justification for not investigating the Edwards issue and look what happened with that. Amazing how hypocritical liberals are and the double standards they employ thinking other people are too stupid to see the thinly veiled sham.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
“McCain-Palin would be BUSH-CHENEY ON STEROIDS.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
SandyB,
Of course the media has only been “trying to bring her down” for 2 weeks. No one really heard of her before then. Every candidate goes through the process of having every past and present action dissected and analyzed. Palin is getting the same treatment. With only 2 months from the time of the announcement to the election, the media is not going to take their time. Also, has any one on the republican side thought that maybe if Palin would talk to the media, the media wouldn’t be going through every aspect of her life digging up every little thing they can find. If you throw a hungry dog a bone, they will most likely not go off looking for scraps someplace else.
Posted by: Mack | September 16, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
I’m glad her and McCain are having limited interviews with the media. With how the MSM has treated Hillary, McCain and Palin this election year they can suck it. They just want interviews for the ratings and for opportunities to splash gaffes all over like they don’t do with Biden and Obama.
It’s pretty amusing how the media has become blatently biased, hollywood is shouting louder than ever, Obama went against his word to have a bigger supply of money, and they still can’t pull the votes. I suppose they know they’d have to pull out all the stops to try to shoehorn in an inexperienced, partisan socialist to the presidency.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Cryos:
re: “Truth hurts ”
that’s exactly why you should read Jake’s article, the one at the very top of this page… you and your republican buddies can try and shout and drown out everyone but when FOX ‘news’ and Karl Rove are saying that Palin/McCain is over the line, well, you are knee deep in moose droppings.
Truth = Republicans totally running the government from 2000 until 2007.
Truth = a fraud war leading to dead Americans.
Truth = McCain’s campaign achieves new lows in American politics.
Truth = Republican/Conservative economics has brought America to it’s knees.
‘mission accomplished’
Posted by: Jazzman | September 16, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Palin transparent? You have got to be kidding me. Her staff has been conducting official business on her Yahoo account to avoid open records laws. She is the reincarnation of Cheney and his quest for executive power.
Posted by: Txnewswatcher | September 16, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“Cryos:
re: “Truth hurts ”
that’s exactly why you should read Jake’s article, the one at the very top of this page… you and your republican buddies can try and shout and drown out everyone but when FOX ‘news’ and Karl Rove are saying that Palin/McCain is over the line, well, you are knee deep in moose droppings.
Truth = Republicans totally running the government from 2000 until 2007.
Truth = a fraud war leading to dead Americans.
Truth = McCain’s campaign achieves new lows in American politics.
Truth = Republican/Conservative economics has brought America to it’s knees.
‘mission accomplished’
Posted by: Jazzman |:
Nice non-response to my posts with your own partisan version of truth. So how is Obama’s “bipartisanship” one of the bedrocks of his campaign LOL?
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“1. So is “truth” defined only by news sources that are nowhere near center.”
You tell me since the Washington Times is a fervently conservative paper that supports Republicans.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
OK-When is Obama going to release his school, community organizer, previous campaign and medical records? Transparent?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 16, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Sarah Palin personally makes women pay for their ‘rape kits.’
Sarah Palin signed her personal extremist belief into Alaskan law. We got her. She is done like a mooseburger.
We got her on imposing her personal extremist beliefs onto the people of Alaska.
She would rather let a woman who was raped be forced to have a baby by taking away that woman’s knowledge of the pregnancy. She would rather allow a baby to arise from incestuous relationship.
We finally got her today.
And it tracks into TROOPERGATE, which is why the McCain campaign has been trying so hard to shut that story down.
Posted by: kravitz | September 16, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
“”1. So is “truth” defined only by news sources that are nowhere near center.”
You tell me since the Washington Times is a fervently conservative paper that supports Republicans.
Posted by: Ryan C”
It’s too bad for you that you shield yourself from any opinion that might contradict your own. I look at everything ranging from right wing to left wing publications and make up my own mind. That is a strategy pursued by open minded, intelligent individuals.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
“When is Obama going to release his school, community organizer, previous campaign and medical records? Transparent?”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Anybody who believes in Creationism would have to ignore hundreds of years of scientific data
and reject all of Geology, Biology, Astronomy, Mathematics, Physics, Archeology.
In other words you would have to be of very low intelligence. And of short sighted provincial attitude. To ignore all the understanding that humanity has gained as a body of knowledge throughout the ages.
The Only place on earth where a large group of people believe in Creationism is the
DUMB BELT or Red State Bible Belt of the USA.
Palin believes in Creationism…. OR Does She?
What would be worse? If she believed it? OR
She knew it to be Garbage but used it as a political stepping stone?
Hmmm. If she actually believes it, That is pathetic
She belongs in a Group house not the White House.
AND DANGEROUS!
If she is faking to please the Right wing fundamentalist Cooks…
That is EVIL!
Posted by: Spear Thrower | September 16, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I would not be quoting the New York times article on Palin, which ran last Sunday. That was one of the sleaziest hatchet job I ever read. The article could have been, and perhaps was, written by the Obama camp, and merely printed in the Times. Perhaps the article should have run with a disclaimer “This is an advertisement, paid for by Barack Obama.”
Posted by: David H | September 16, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
There really is a certain gang-rape element in how the “media” (mostly male at the top) has dealt first with Clinton, now with Palin.
…..
The difference is Clinton face it frontally while Palin hides from it. I don’t know for how long…..
Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 16, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The bloom is off the rose
But then a funny thing happened: Palin lost some of her luster. Since Sept. 13, Palin’s unfavorables have climbed from 30 percent to 36 percent. Meanwhile, her favorables have slipped from 52 percent to 48 percent. That’s a three-day net swing of -10 points, and it leaves her in the Sept. 15 Diageo/Hotline tracking poll with the smallest favorability split (+10) of any of the Final Four. Over the course of a single weekend, in other words, Palin went from being the most popular White House hopeful to the least.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
“Vote for someone smarter than you.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Gov. Palin, in deference to the Democrat Presidential nominee, is giving courtesy to Sen. Obama to have a press conference that he doesn’t walk out of after 8 questions, before having a press conference herself.
Posted by: Neo | September 16, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
“The stakes are real and they’re terrifyingly high. This election matters. It matters. It really matters. Let me say that one more time. This. Really. Matters.”
_________
Yes! They really do, and that’s why I will not be voting for Obama!
Keep on harping on the niggling, unimportant things…..
Keep on throwing spear.
One day, your aim will be even worse then usual, and you will puncture B O’s hot air balloon…. and then YOU’ll be able to see him as he really is!
Meantime, you and Ryan C should become roomies!
Posted by: eyes wide open | September 16, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
“There really is a certain gang-rape element in how the “media” (mostly male at the top) has dealt first with Clinton, now with Palin.
…..
The difference is Clinton face it frontally while Palin hides from it. I don’t know for how long…..”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Bush appointed Republican Minerals Management Service employees who supported McCain -Palin, frequently consumed alcohol at industry functions, had used cocaine and marijuana, and had sexual relationships with oil and natural gas company representatives.
The MMS scandal gives new Meaning to the GOP mantra “Drill Baby Drill.”
THIS IS THE NEOCON WAY OF DOING BUSINESS
Posted by: Spear Thrower | September 16, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Eyes wide do you also believe in Creationism??
Posted by: Spear Thrower | September 16, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Here we have Jake lying about Obama’s financing “promise” again. Obama broke NO public finance promise. He said he’d agree to restrictions if McCain would. McCain wouldn’t agree, so Obama dropped it. I can’t believe Tapper doesn’t understand something this simple, so I have to assume he’s lying for the right wing.
McCain actually did some illegal maneuvering, pledging to authorities to go with public finance in order to secure collateral in financing his campaign, and then backing out. No Tapper outrage, because McCain’s a Republican.
Posted by: pickerap | September 16, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
to • Belle Starr
re:
“A stilted speaking style is no indication of smarts. ”
neither is being shot down…..
Posted by: Rex | September 16, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
IT’S LIKE THE TITANIC. The U.S. is like that glorious, opulent, fabulous sinking ship. No one wants to believe that we could really go down. We’ve been so well off for so long. Instead of facing the terrifying reality of our plummeting economy, McCain-Palin supporters are like the Titanic guests who preferred to stay at the party, turn up the music and dance, pretending that they weren’t moments away from disaster.
We have George W. Bush’s 8 years of failed trickle-down economics to thank for our ruined economy. Though it’s not been ruined for himself and his business buddies who got what they wanted in Iraq. funny how the richer some folks got these past eight years, the poorer others got. G.W. Bush has shrunk our middle class and ballooned out the amount of poor people in the U.S. There’s been no trickle; just some super-richies who are growing their piles of $.
McCain plans to continue down Bush’s economic road. He has a record of voting with Bush on the issues–91% of the time. He has many Bush loyalists working on his campaign and waiting for their places in the McCain administration.
How can U.S. citizens allow this country to sink further down? This is the titanic, people. This is a great country that is truly going down. It takes courage to recognize a disaster coming our way. It might be easier for some to cling to old, familiar ways, but this is the time for something new, something smarter than what got us in this mess.
Posted by: Spear Thrower | September 16, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
It still amazes me that NO ONE has done one-tenth of the vetting job on Obama during the last 20 months that everyone is now doing on Sarah Palin…….
Posted by: SandyB | Sep 16, 2008 3:04:26 PM
Are you kidding me? All the candidates during the primaries went through this process, yes even McPOW, until either they clinched or dropped out. Sarah Palin is not know on the national scene, she has no record outside Alaska so the Americans in the other 49 states have the RIGHT to know about her. So far all the information the campaign has told America is a LIE, from her reformer status to fiscal responsibility because any decision she makes while in office will affect us all.
Obama has been called EVERYTHING including not a child of God and he took all the criticism, racist, name calling since he began this race with dignity. So if people are questioning her previous decisions in Alaska, how she governs it is our right as Americans…if she can’t take the heat get out of the national kitchn.
Posted by: NavyMom44 | September 16, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Palin is just a brief Phenomenon. Americans usually are fascinated by Mysteries. We are getting to know her more and more. Stories about her getting more interesting. Her true color is more apparent now. People will feel decieved by her lies.
Posted by: SP | September 16, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
“The stakes are real and they’re terrifyingly high. This election matters. It matters. It really matters. Let me say that one more time. This. Really. Matters.
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Palin’s tactical “hiding” from the prep-school commentariat will make it even sweeter when she breaks these guys’ pencils in the debate with Biden.
…………………….
I can hardly wait to see Palin debate.
Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 16, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Reform causes the long knives to come out, doesn’t it?
Posted by: drjohn | September 16, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
jpt writes:
“Obama’s broken promises on public financing comes to mind”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
The key word here is “attacks”.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 16, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
Palin’s rise is proof that the
dumbing down of America is
proceeding apace.
Posted by: anon | September 16, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“I can hardly wait to see Palin debate.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
anon
and Obamas rise differs from that how?
LOL
Posted by: staniam | September 16, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
belle star
they are worried and Biden even said that he wasnt the best VP choice
Posted by: staniam | September 16, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
“Palin’s rise is proof that the dumbing down of America is proceeding apace.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
“they are worried and Biden even said that he wasnt the best VP choice”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 16, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
“….McCain has shown in choosing his VP. There is a reason people vet their VP choices.”
——
There are those who disagree with you, and as for vetting, Obama trashed the best VP he could have had…. and went to another who required NO vetting but publicly admits he isn’t as good as Hillary!
And how come Palin is being vetted ever so much more carefully then Obama ever was even though he’s running for the higher office?
There is usually a reason for vetting one’s presidential choices!
Posted by: eyes wide open | September 16, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“He said he’d agree to restrictions if McCain would. McCain wouldn’t agree, so Obama dropped it.”
Hmmm. That’s interesting last time I checked McCain is taking public financing. Keep a hold of the pipe dream.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
“Bush appointed Republican Minerals Management Service employees who supported McCain -Palin, frequently consumed alcohol at industry functions, had used cocaine and marijuana, and had sexual relationships with oil and natural gas company representatives.
The MMS scandal gives new Meaning to the GOP mantra “Drill Baby Drill.”
THIS IS THE NEOCON WAY OF DOING BUSINESS”
Nice spin. Most of these employees had been in the agency a long time and several of them were appointed by Clinton (many were there beforehand).
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
“The Only place on earth where a large group of people believe in Creationism is the
DUMB BELT or Red State Bible Belt of the USA.”
I am neutral on this issue since I am agnostic. However this statement is ignorant. Most world religions believe in god and creationism to a degree regardless of what the media has told you.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
“Obama is just a brief Phenomenon. Americans usually are fascinated by Mysteries. We are getting to know him more and more. Stories about him are getting more interesting and his true color is more apparent now. People will feel deceived by his lies.”
>>>>>>>>>>>
Once you correct the spelling of
“deceived”, you get a whole new perspective!
Posted by: eyes wide open | September 16, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Go read the op-ed and articles today by three hard core conservative writers that appeared in Washington Post, Atalntic. They all blasted mccain for picking Palin as his vice president. They all agreed that Palin is the most unqualified for the post. Need I say more?
Posted by: themanwhosawtomorrow | September 16, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Now you see her, now you don’t,
Slick Sarah is going to make
everything more open.
Is she also promising to make
everything more truthful by
not telling any more lies?
Posted by: anon | September 16, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Will someone explain this to Me PLEASE!
Ok, before Palin, it was said that no one trust Obama because he was virtual AN UNKNOWN, AND CAN’T BE TRUSTED.
Now PALIN, who is really a unknown comes out of the CLOSET AS V.P., an America DOESN’T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH WHAT THEY DON’T KNOW ABOUT HER..
GET OVER IT, IT IS ALL ABOUT “RACIST PART OF AMERICA”.
Posted by: Underdog | September 16, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Just posting a reminder of some truth since liberals are concerned about “getting back to the issues.” The issue of bipartisanship is a major one in this election and the washington times analyzed the REAL DATA ie bill sponsorships and party line votes.
This story should be splashed all over the MSM if the MSM was respectable and balanced, but it tells a more true story of bipartisanship so I just happened to get the link from a blog.The whole “same as bush” for McCain and “new kind of politician” are brought back down to earth.
Obama’s 97% party line voting is change? And McCains 85% republican party line voting is same as Bush? This analysis is based off of voting records and bill sponsors so REAL NUMBERS not BS rhetoric.
washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/15/records-show-mccain-more-bipartisan
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“That’s interesting last time I checked McCain is taking public financing”
yes and McCain refused to rein in right wing 527s.
Which was the condition for Obama and he accepting public financing.
Which reminds me of how in the primaries McCain said he was going to take public funding, got loans based on that promise and then opted out of the public financing system
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
That was not the condition. No amount of spin will change that Obama said he would take public financing if McCain did; point blank.
Obama has done nothing to stop 527s regardless of what the media tells you. Obama has been silent while moveon and other 527s have done several ads.
I can understand why Obama would want 527s out though. Democrats this year have the MSM bought and sold so they have billions of dollars worth of free marketing. However even the billions of dollars worth of free air time won’t be enough to shoehorn in an inexperienced, socialist party line hack like Obama. The American people aren’t that dumbed down (yet).
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
It’s too bad that many blacks don’t realize the democratic party uses them as pawns as they see fit and the democratic party is the racist one who thinks blacks and other racial groups can’t compete on even terms.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
“That was not the condition. No amount of spin will change that Obama said he would take public financing if McCain did; point blank.”
OBAMA: “Yes. I have been a long-time advocate for public financing of campaigns combined with free television and radio time as a way to reduce the influence of moneyed special interests. I introduced public financing legislation in the Illinois State Senate, and am the only 2008 candidate to have sponsored Senator Russ Feingold’s (D-WI) bill to reform the presidential public financing system. In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election. My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election. My proposal followed announcements by some presidential candidates that they would forgo public financing so they could raise unlimited funds in the general election. The Federal Election Commission ruled the proposal legal, and Senator John McCain (r-AZ) has already pledged to accept this fundraising pledge. If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election.” (Sen. Barack Obama, “Midwest Democracy Network Presidential Candidate Questionnaire: The Responses Of John Edwards And Barack Obama,” Midwest Democracy Network, Released 11/27/07)
McCain turned all of his primary money over to be used by the RNC.
“Obama has done nothing to stop 527s regardless of what the media tells you. Obama has been silent while moveon.org and other 527s have done several ads.”
Obama let go of the reins this week and this week is the first time you have seen any ads by liberal 527s.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
“Obama let go of the reins this week and this week is the first time you have seen any ads by liberal 527s.”
Straight up lie. Moveon.org ran several “100 years of war” several weeks ago in addition to other advertisements.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Also Ryan C since you posted a quote from Obama; where is the 527 clause?
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Cryos
MONEY IN YOUR POCKET UNDER DEMOCRATS:
LOSING YOUR HOME UNDER REPUBLICANS;
WHICH IS YOUR CHOICE.
A FOOL MAKES THE SAME MISTAKE OVER AND OVER..
CHECK OUT THE CENSUS FOR INCOME OF AMERICANS FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS, AND WHO WAS THE PRESIDENT.
Posted by: Underdog | September 16, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
“Cryos
MONEY IN YOUR POCKET UNDER DEMOCRATS:
LOSING YOUR HOME UNDER REPUBLICANS;
WHICH IS YOUR CHOICE.
A FOOL MAKES THE SAME MISTAKE OVER AND OVER..
CHECK OUT THE CENSUS FOR INCOME OF AMERICANS FOR THE LAST 30 YEARS, AND WHO WAS THE PRESIDENT.”
FYI this is a simple minded explanation for several reasons a couple of which I’ll list.
1. Congress passed laws the president signs them. The executive branch does have some leeway with policy
2. The people who are losing their homes are mostly the morons who couldn’t figure out what an ARM loan is or that got a house knowing they couldn’t afford it.
3. Policy can take several years to take effect. Some budget/policy changes have an immediate effect but many changes take a lot of time.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Five Alaska Legislators, Rep. Wes Keller, Rep. Mike Kelly, Rep. Bob Lynn, Sen. Fred Dyson, and Sen. Tom Wagoner, will file suit in state superior court in Anchorage tomorrow morning (9/16/08) at 9:00 am (Superior courthouse 4th Avenue) against Sen. French, Sen. Kim Elton, Stephen Branchflower and the Alaska Legislative Council in order to halt the investigation of Governor Sarah Palin and others because the investigators have lost the appearance of impartiality required under the Alaska Constitution. The Legislators will ask for declaratory and injunctive relief in the investigation, stating that it is an attempt to use the Alaska Legislative Council to further partisan politics.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Obama said he was foregoing the $85 million in public funding he could have received because it tied his hands — and because the campaign finance system was allegedly slanted toward his expected Republican challenger, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).Accusing McCain of being “fueled by contributions from Washington lobbyists and special interest PACs,” Obama said that 527s tied to McCain and the Republican National Committee are “spending millions and millions in unlimited donations” to attack him.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Ryan C that was his sidestep response for breaking his word.
You already posted Obama’s quote showing that he broke his word; point blank. He can come up with excuses later but 527s had nothing to do with his quote. Nice try though.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Underdog you are making yourself look foolish; please do yourself a favor and stop. The EFFECTS of a bill take several years to take effect.
Here’s a more concrete example that has an analogy to less concrete policy changes. If a bill passes to build a new government building, do you go out the next morning and the building is magically already there because the bill passed?
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
“You already posted Obama’s quote showing that he broke his word”
How so?
Obama specifically sought to limit the influence of national party spending.
McCain would have none of that.
Why would McCain give up his advantage of party financing?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
“3. Policy can take several years to take effect. Some budget/policy changes have an immediate effect but many changes take a lot of time.”
I agree it took until recently for us to feel the full brunt of Republican deregulation and removing of oversight.
And now we pay dearly for their policies.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Cryos
Point is Cryos is that Republicans have had control of the Senate, the House, the Judicail and Executive Branch for 7 years.
You do agree with that do you not.
Since you are so learned.
What the HELL HAPPEN
9/11 on their watch
After math of Katrina on their watch
Iraq war on their watch
Largest foreclosure since the GREAT DEPRESSION on their watch
BANK GOING BANKRUPT on their watch.
Give me one just one REASON you feel so tied to these LOSERS.
Posted by: Underdog | September 16, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
“”You already posted Obama’s quote showing that he broke his word”
How so?
Obama specifically sought to limit the influence of national party spending.
McCain would have none of that.
Why would McCain give up his advantage of party financing?”
Nice try to switch subjects.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
re: Cryos
“It’s too bad that many blacks don’t realize the democratic party uses them as pawns as they see fit and the democratic party is the racist one who thinks blacks and other racial groups can’t compete on even terms.”
===================================
That’s almost as good as McCain/Palin running away from the last 8 years of Bush & Cheney… man up… your boys & gals, your policies, you were running the show..
if your post wasn’t so sad, I might just laugh….that’s the true Republican/Conservative sentiment showing itself… yes, Republicans are the party of women, and racial diversity…… LOL
Posted by: Jazzman | September 16, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
“Point is Cryos is that Republicans have had control of the Senate, the House, the Judicail and Executive Branch for 7 years.
You do agree with that do you not.”
Actually no one has control of the judicial branch. Most of Bush’s appointees have been in permanent delayed status. McCain joined the bipartisan coalition to help get some appointments through. Just another bipartisan attempt by the real bipartisan candidate. FYI in 2001 Jeffords went independant so republicans “controlled” the senate with 49 like democrats now. And it was 6 years for the record.
Katrina – Katrina was underestimated and FEMA didn’t have the resources. The Fed is supposed to ASSIST the state and the state didn’t call in aid until it was too late. The fed dropped the ball but only after the state and local governments dropped the ball. And the ignorant people of NO were stupid enough to elect the same mayor.
Notice natural disasters in other places don’t have the same effect and people get back on their feet not staying in trailers for years afterwards never trying to get a job.
9/11 on their watch – THe events leading to 911 happened on Clinton’s watch. The censorship of “Path to 911″ is evidence of who has something to hide having to do with 911. Remember also in 1993 the trade center was bombed under clintons watch also.
Iraq war on their watch – I don’t agree with the Iraq war either from the stated reasons.
Largest foreclosure since the GREAT DEPRESSION on their watch – Bad decisions and loans were made helping contribute to this. Part of the deregulation was due to politically correct liberal type policies. Both parties are to blame and don’t forget the biggest beneficaries of contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac went to Dodd, Clinton and Obama all democrats.
BANK GOING BANKRUPT on their watch. – This is due to greed. It will do good for some of these banks to go under as it will serve as a lesson in the future to the effects of bad policy. Bad business decisions = you go out of business.
Posted by: Cryos | September 16, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Underdog: “Republicans have had control of the Senate, the House, the Judicial and Executive Branch for 7 years.”
April 2001 – December 2003: The Democrats controlled the Senate.
January 2007 – present: The Democrats have controlled both Houses of Congress.
Posted by: James Danley | September 16, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
James Danley
PEANUTS, SO LET CALL IT 6 YEARS. EVEN THOUGH, THEY CAN’T MAKE A BILL THE VERY FIRST DAY THEY GOT IN OFFICE, I THINK THEY WOULD WANT TO TALK TO THE PEOPLE THEY REPRESENT ABOUT REAL CHANGE.
NOT LIKE THE REPUBLICANS THEY ONLY TALK TO THE LOBBIEST.
Posted by: Underdog | September 16, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Are we sure this woman didn’t work in the Bush White House in a previous life?
Using personal email accounts to avoid FOA requests, instructing staff not to speak to the press, trying to shut down investigations after she said she’d “welcome” them, relying excessively on personal “loyalty” (someone recently cracked that her high school yearbook looks like a directory of state officials).
Sounds like the last eight years to me.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 16, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
“April 2001 – December 2003: The Democrats controlled the Senate.”
Jeffords left the GOP party at the end of May 2001.
The GOP regained control of the Senate during the 2002 election. Senators being serving on Jan 1st 2003.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
Look at 27. What Senator Barack Obama and the Liberal Media does not want you to know:
1) According to CNN and ABC (Aug 08), half of Obama’s contributors have given $1,000 or more.
2) Obama does not want you to know that the number one (#1) receiver of Fanny Mae and Fanny Mac, Congressional Donor Recipient, John Johnson, was Obama’s VP candidate.
3) Obama was the number two (#2) on the Fanny Mae and Fanny Mac, Congressional Donor Recipient list.
4) Obama refused to hold debates initially with Senator Clinton and now Senator McCain.
5) Obama knows as a fact that in the same breath, Senator McCain made a joke about the average American makes $5 million a year. During the Freedom Debates, McCain correctly stated that Obama and his supporters would use this joke to attack him.
6) While Americans are having a hard time paying for gas and losing their homes, Obama is going to diner with his Hollywood friends that are paying $28,500 plus the maximum allowable donation of $2,500 per person.
7) Obama deployed 31 investigators and/or lawyers to go to Alaska to influence the Democratic Party attack on Governor Sarah Palin.
8) Obama claims that he is not responsible for comments or actions that his committee says. Anyone that speaks for Obama is Obama’s responsibility for Hollywood Obama.
9) Obama made race the center issue of his presidential race.
10) House Rep. Nancy Pelosi has stopped all energy Republican Bills including having any bill go on Congressional record.
11) Obama has not passed one bill of substance since becoming a US Senator.
12)Obama has attached his name to countless Bills to validate his Senator salary.
13) Obama has yet to hold one meeting as the Chairman of Foreign Affairs responsible for Afghanistan.
14) The Democratic Congress is passing bills to make Obama look better than his record reveals.
15) Obama continues to run as the elected President based on the US flags and Presidential podium that he used on the campaign trail.
16) The Congress has passed 1,900 symbolic bills while not passing other more badly needed bills.
17) With full support of Obama, CNN has replace MSNBC as Obama’s primary media propaganda machine.
18) Obama went to Europe and attacked America and American’s saying he was their citizen.
19) On the O’Reilly Factor, Obama stated that he has not made contact with Ayes for over 20 years. Then he stated that he had talked to Ayers 1 ½ year ago.
20) Fox News has joined all Liberal News Networks to attack Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin. Showing Americans make fun or make jokes about Palin or McCain on the daily news is not in good taste or newsworthy.
21) Obama and his family took a private airliner to go to a private island to go on vacation using Donor funds. A first in American politics and the Election Board has yet to investigate Obama’s spending expenditures. This is second free vacation in recent times justifying his vacation with a few media interviews to make them marginally legal but fully unethical.
22) Obama supporters are on the Alaska Democratic lynching mob including 31 Obama employees.
23) In record time, since the Democratic Party won both houses of Congress, Americans have lost more of the American dream than the previous six years under the Republican Party.
24) The reason Obama stayes away from making comments about Wall Street, Obama received more money from Wall Street than any other politician.
25) Obama supported sex education from Kindergarten (K) to 12th grade in spite of the liberal media and Obama saying Obama lied about this report and/or Obama supported law.
26) Obama thinks that because of his week trip to Europe, he is an expert on Europe.
27) Obama clearly has the bloodline of VP Chaney.
27) And the Obama list grows and grows…..
Posted by: Dr Hubert, Lt Col, USAF, Retired (2005) | September 16, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Palin puts MOOSE FOOT IN MOUTH
She state that she was not knowledgeable to be a CEO of a company like HP.
Posted by: Underdog | September 16, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
TANNING BED GOVERNANCE:
Cover yourself in a protective sheild and pretend everything is sunny.
Posted by: InTouch | September 16, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Well at least we know the answer to the answer to the question, Do you know Bush’s Philosophy? It seems that Sarah Palin has extensive knowledge of his philosophy and practices it as well, if you don’t want to answer to the people, well just don’t.
Posted by: aw | September 16, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
For a girl with nuthin’ to say,
she sure tells a lot of whoppers.
Posted by: anon | September 16, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
The Lt; Col likes lists with fake fact…let’s have some fun!
“1) According to CNN and ABC (Aug 08), half of Obama’s contributors have given $1,000 or more.”
50% of Obama’s donors gave $200 or less (opensecrets)
“2) Obama does not want you to know that the number one (#1) receiver of Fanny Mae and Fanny Mac, Congressional Donor Recipient, John Johnson, was Obama’s VP candidate.”
Obama got about $110K from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac employees. Chris Dodd was the top receiver of donations from employees of those groups. Jim Johnson headed up Obama’s VP search committee.
3) Obama was the number two (#2) on the Fanny Mae and Fanny Mac, Congressional Donor Recipient list.”
Which contradicts point 2. And its Freddie Mac.
4) Obama refused to hold debates initially with Senator Clinton and now Senator McCain.
There were 22 debates between Hillary & Obama. Obama offered to debate McCain on July 4th. McCain refused. McCain also refused to debate Huckabee when they were the last two GOP hopefuls.
I could go on but you get the point.
Why do right wingers offer up dumb lies in their smears?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Sarah has governed a State and actually has a resume, which is something BHO does not have. Whatever Sarah is accused of doing is insignificant when compared with BHO’s lies, scandals and crooks. BHO has lowered the bar, not to mention that these misdemeanours have been overlooked or accepted by the American media and public.
Posted by: Beckie | September 16, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“TANNING BED GOVERNANCE:
Cover yourself in a protective shield and pretend everything is sunny.”
Line of the day!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Ryan C, I stand corrected. The source I had looked like Mar 24, 2001. But on further checking it does say May 24, 2001. So from June 2001 – December 2003 the Democrats controlled the Senate.
Posted by: James Danley | September 16, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“2) Obama does not want you to know that the number one (#1) receiver of Fanny Mae and Fanny Mac, Congressional Donor Recipient, John Johnson, was Obama’s VP candidate.”
Obama got about $110K from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac employees. Chris Dodd was the top receiver of donations from employees of those groups. Jim Johnson headed up Obama’s VP search committee.
3) Obama was the number two (#2) on the Freddie and Fannt Funds Congressional Donor Recipient list.”
Which contradicts NOTHING.
This is NOT new news!. It is just NEWS that the press has avoided publicizing because it might cause Obama’s ears to wriggle, and cause him to cry.
And, by the way….. you keep mentioning 22 Hillary/Obama speeches.
There were an awful lot of them done under wraps then.
And as for McCain declining on a Holiday, I don’t blame him.
Besides, HE didn’t want speechifying; HE wanted a return to the town hal kind of talks…… but Obama doesn’t fare well in that type of a set up.
Posted by: hmmmmm | September 16, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
“So from June 2001 – December 2003 the Democrats controlled the Senate.”
New Senators are sworn in in the beginning of Jan 2003.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
“And, by the way….. you keep mentioning 22 Hillary/Obama speeches.
There were an awful lot of them done under wraps then.”
Its 22 debates not speeches. Nearly all of them were on TV.
“And as for McCain declining on a Holiday, I don’t blame him.”
Maybe McCain if elected could take on Bush’s vaunted most days on vacation record.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Hey Doc !!!!
(Dr Hubert, Lt Col, USAF, Retired (2005)
Only 27 missteps for Obama?? How about these 70 lies, flip flops, failures on John McCain…from cheating on his first wife with his current wife to supporting the confederate flag to the Keating 5 and on and on.
C’mon Doc. You can do better than a mere 27 infractions, can’t you?
Posted by: Lila | September 16, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
“27) Obama clearly has the bloodline of VP Chaney.”
So this is something the “liberal media” doesn’t want us to know?
That’s rich… I guess you don’t watch TV. This has been discussed to the point of Jay Leno and Obama joking about it on The Tonight Show.
As for the rest, I suggest you have FOX report on it, unless you’re willing to say that they’re a part of “liberal media” as well.
Posted by: alex | September 16, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
I can’t wait for Troopergate to expose Palin once and for all. Why would she commend Monegan for his exemplary work and then 3 months later, fire him? Why did she give his replacement, Kopp, a $10,000 severence package after 11 days of work? She’s running her own mafia in Alaska. But not for long!!
Posted by: Beckie | September 16, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
C’mon Doc. You can do better than a mere 27 infractions, can’t you?
Posted by: Lila | Sep 16, 2008 7:48:53 PM
_________________
HOW ABOUT THE OBAMA LAUNDRY LIST OF LIES…..lots more than a mere 27, and
GROWING every day!
Try it!
You’ll hate it….
BUT
THE TRUTH SHALL MAKE YOU FREE!
Posted by: just thinking... | September 16, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
“Why did she give his replacement, Kopp, a $10,000 severence package after 11 …”
_____________
Why not?
Obama and his wee church paid off his pastor to the tune of $10,000,000 in the form of a “retirement fund”…. and through in a multi-million dollar mini-mansion to sweeten the deal!
Posted by: just thinking... | September 16, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
“Its 22 debates not speeches. Nearly all of them were on TV.”
As I said, most of them must have been done under wraps in the middle of the night,……or on channels unavailable to us lowly folk here in Illinois where we suffer through the highest taxes in the country!
Posted by: tarnation! | September 16, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
My guess is that Sarah Palin will be a lot more transparent than Old Joe Biden will ever be.
Have you ever wondered why Old Joe Biden never served in military at a time when the draft was in force and Viet Nam was raging.
Can you say “Old Joe Biden the draft dodger?”
According to an article published in August of 2008, Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden received five student draft deferments during the Vietnam War and later was disqualified from service because of “asthma as a teenager.”
Asthma?
What the that all about?
In “Promises to Keep,” a memoir that was published last year and became an instant best-seller after he was tapped as Obama’s running mate, Biden never once mentions his asthma, recounting an active childhood, work as a lifeguard and football exploits in high school.
Another “Change We Need?”
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 16, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
“As I said, most of them must have been done under wraps in the middle of the night,……”
No, nearly every single one was broadcast live on TV, from cspan to cable networks to quite a few on network TV.
Since you repeated what you said even though you were informed it was wrong, now I have to call you a liar.
“or on channels unavailable to us lowly folk here in Illinois where we suffer through the highest taxes in the country!”
If you can’t afford cable, you’re not paying the highest tax rates in the country.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
What McCain and Palin are
saying is that they are
liars and they are going
to keep telling lies to
American people.
So what’s anybody going
to do about it?
Lies or not, millions of
Republicans will vote for
the pair. And they will
keep on lying.
Posted by: anon | September 16, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Thanks again for the correction, Ryan C. Your right, it should have been December 2002.
Beckie, don’t hold your breath waiting for the shoe to drop regarding Troopergate. In 2006 the state investigators found the trooper guilty of “a significant pattern of judgment failure.” This pattern included the tasering of his 10 year-old stepson, drinking beer while in his state trooper vehicle, and killing a moose out of season. The trooper was never fired. He was given a 5-day suspension. The trooper’s boss, Walt Monegan, has already stated that neither Gov. Palin nor her husband, Todd Palin, requested him to fire the trooper. Although he says he felt “pressure” to fire him.
Now as for the firing of Walt Monegan, as a member of Gov. Palin’s cabinet, she can fire him for ANY reason. However, Gov. Palin fired him because he opposed her budget priorities.
Posted by: James Danley | September 16, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Rejoining John McCain for a joint rally near Youngstown, Ohio, Sarah Palin offered an abbreviated version of her stump speech that included no mention of her putting the state plane in Alaska on eBay or her opposition to the “Bridge to Nowhere.”
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
“The trooper’s boss, Walt Monegan, has already stated that neither Gov. Palin nor her husband, Todd Palin, requested him to fire the trooper. Although he says he felt “pressure” to fire him.”
That Todd Plain contacted this guy at all is extremely improper. We also have the issue of confidential information being leaked. You may remember the Linda Tripp scenario. This is similar.
“Now as for the firing of Walt Monegan, as a member of Gov. Palin’s cabinet, she can fire him for ANY reason. However, Gov. Palin fired him because he opposed her budget priorities.”
That is what she claims in documents her lawyer filed.
Meanwhile her failure to release emails indeed her use of personal email accounts to conduct public business are something that should be looked at.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
James, we have the same last name, Danley…very interesting. But we sure don’t have the same political views. Maybe we’re related.
Posted by: Beckie | September 16, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
“Why did she give his replacement, Kopp, a $10,000 severence package after 11 …”
_____________
Why not?
Obama and his wee church paid off his pastor to the tune of $10,000,000 in the form of a “retirement fund”…. and through in a multi-million dollar mini-mansion to sweeten the deal!
_____________________________________—
WHAT THE HECK DOES OBAMA’S CHURCH’S DONATIONS TO THEIR PASTOR HAVE TO DO WITH PALIN AWARDING KOPP $10,000 OF STATE MONEY?
The former deals with private, personal funds donated by consenting adults to their pastor. The latter deals with the near theft of taxpayer’s hard earned dollars going to cover up Palin’s lies about Troopergate!! You can’t compare apples to crocodiles.
Posted by: Beckie | September 16, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
For some reason, this blog will not allow me to post a link to McCain’s list of 70 flip flops, lies and failures. Just google “McCain 70 flip flops.” Makes Obama look as solid as the pope.
Posted by: Beckie | September 16, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Beckie,
The blog erases all links.
Just let people know what you want them to look for on google.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 16, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Transparent as she has been
as
TITANIUM STEEL
Posted by: Omentum | September 16, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
I’m a young minority male who embraces the hip hop culture and dress accordingly. Hip hop influences my style, music, vernacular, and mindset. For those who are quick to stereotype, I’m sure my presence evokes thoughts of thuggery. However, I am a college graduate, gainfully employed, and advancing in a promising career. Having grown up in a large urban city, I know my share of thugs. And trust me, the republicans are no different than the typical street hoodlums. The manner in which the republicans have conducted this campaign is nothing less than gangster politics. The street “dogs” that I know can only aspire to be as shrewd, cutthroat, and sinister, as the “Rethuglican” party. Damn, I wish I had coined that term!
Posted by: J.T. | September 16, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
BTW: Jake, thanks for another intelligent, thought-provoking article
Posted by: JudiNV | September 16, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Whoops! My bad. Update. The count for John McCain’s transgressions are up from 70 to 76. Google: “Jukebox John keeps changing his tune.” Obama has a looooong way to go to catch up with J-Mac. With only 27 infractions, Obama still won’t come close to matching John McCain’s outrageous record of asinine misgivings, missteps, mismanagement and mispicking of Sarah Palin. Keep lying John. I love to watch your numbers grow.
Posted by: 76-27=49 | September 16, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
What’s a PUMA?
Posted by: Loren | September 16, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Palin is as transparent as mud. What a joke. To think of her possibly taking over for McCain as president makes me want to run for the hills. She must have a tremendous ego to think that she has the body of knowledge to run the country. And McCain, in choosing her, proved not only that he is NOT a maverick (if he was a true maverick he would have chosen Lieberman, who McCain really wanted), but he’s weak as well. He caved to the “base.”
Posted by: outtahere | September 16, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
How can Palin be transparent? CNN reported that her SUPPORTERS couldn’t use their own signs to cheer her on at one of her bogus, lying rallies. They DISTRIBUTED those yellow posters that read “read my lipstick”, “mommies for Palin” etc. Their campaign is controlling the rally signs for goodness sake!!! Her camp is trying to control EVERYTHING pertaining to her, so they can hopefully sail into the Whitehouse. WRONG!!! Sara Palin will never see the light of day at an office at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Posted by: Lila | September 16, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Well… guess what?
Her beloved yahoo email account has been phished.
an individual was able to guess the password (making this a phishing attack, not a hack).
screencaps of several emails were taken.
then another individual comming from the same group felt bad and changed the password and notified the FBI.
just goes to show you:
Sarah Palin is not up to the standards of running the US.
Alaska is another story, but when you run the US, you have to CONSTANTLY scrutinize everything.
she just doesnt have what it takes.
the concept that her Yahoo account might not be secure did not even cross her mind, now she learns the hard way.
Posted by: mongo | September 16, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Jayhawk
re: “Can you say “Old Joe Biden the draft dodger?”
Do you really want to go there? well, OK then..
Read it and weep for the over 4000 brave Americans that have died for these frauds.
Bush and his fraud national Guard service, Cheney and all the rest of the chicken hawk neo-cons who like to get other peoples kids killed so their buds can get a hold of more Arab oil.
* Karl Rove: did not serve.
* Paul Wolfowitz: did not serve.
* Richard Perle: did not serve.
* Douglas Feith: did not serve.
* Eliot Abrams: did not serve.
* Ari Fleischer: did not serve.
* Andrew Card: did not serve.
* Ken Adelman: did not serve.
# Sean Hannity: did not serve.
# Bill O’Reilly: did not serve.
# Matt Drudge: did not serve.
# Steve Forbes: did not serve.
# Tony Snow: did not serve.
# Michael “Savage” Weiner: did not serve.
# Brit Hume: did not serve.
# Roger Ailes: did not serve.
# Chris Matthews: did not serve.
# Neil Boortz : did not serve.
# Paul Gigot: did not serve.
# Bill Kristol: did not serve.
# Ralph Reed: did not serve.
# Michael Medved: did not serve.
# Charlie Daniels: did not serve.
# Anne Coulter: did not serve.
# Jerry Falwell: did not serve.
# Alan Keyes : did not serve.
# Ted Nugent: did not serve.
None of George W. Bush’s three brothers, Jeb, Marvin, or Neil served.
G.O.P. presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, none of his five sons served.
Giuliani did not serve in the military during the Vietnam War. He received a student deferment while at Manhattan College and another while at NYU Law. Upon graduation from NYU Law in 1968, he was classified as 1-A, available for military service. He applied for a deferment but was rejected. In 1969, MacMahon (the judge for whom he was clerking) wrote a letter to Giuliani’s draft board, asking that he be reclassified as 2-A, civilian occupation deferment, because Giuliani, who was a law clerk for MacMahon, was an essential employee. The deferment was granted. In 1970, Giuliani received a high draft lottery number; he was not called up for service although by then he had been reclassified 1-A
- Mitch McConnell, the current Republican leader in the U.S. Senate: did not serve.
- Bill Frist,, the former Republican leader in the U.S. Senate: did not serve.
- Trent Lott, the former Republican leader in the U.S. Senate: avoided the draft, did not serve.
- Saxby Chambliss: did not serve. “Bad knee” He defeated tripelegic Democratic war hero Max Cleland by questioning his patriotism!
- Phil Gramm: did not serve.
- Spencer Abraham: did not serve.
- Jon Kyl: did not serve.
- John Engler: did not serve.
- Don Nickles: did not serve.
- Rick Santorum: did not serve.
- John Ashcroft: did not serve. Seven deferments, to teach business.
- Richard Shelby: did not serve.
Rush Limbaugh — sought deferment (because of a cyst on his tail end).
(Rush’s conservative brother) David Limbaugh: did not serve.
George Will — sought graduate school deferment, (too smart to die).
Pat Buchanan — sought deferment (for bad knee).
Pat Robertson — his US Senator father got him out of Korea as soon as the shooting began.
This is just a partial list……
GET IT ?
Posted by: Jazzman | September 16, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Monegan actually tried to stay off the radar and be deferential to the governor and let the investigation play out. But when she came out and lied about the contacts, he spoke out about the multiple meetings with Todd Palin AND contacts from Palin about the trooper just prior to being fired when he refused. Regardless of what the trooper did, that investigation wen through the proper channels and both his internal department review and the custody hearings were overseen by neutral and competent administrators. So, she says she fired him because he was seeking federal money to investigate sexual assault cases? And replaced him with a man with a known record of sexual harassment claims. This is the same woman who made rape victims pay for their own rape kits and would insist on her 14 year old daughter (the girl’s age at the time) not get an abortion even she were raped. And she won’t answer questions about it and won’t meet with an investigator or permit aides to testify. Wow. She may be a woman, but she clearly HATES women. Well, I guess she gets along just fine with McCain who voted againt Biden’s Violence Against Women Act and nominated his wife for the stripper contest.
Posted by: Kate Mom of Twins | September 16, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Obama’s a fraud manufactured by corporate Stalinists — and when it comes to fraudiness, Palin’s not EVEN in it with the ghastly Biden
—————————————
Is a Corporate Stalinist anything like a Liberal Fascist?
Please help, I’m trying to learn political science from this discussion.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 17, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Stalinism is when a government rules through secrecy, kind of like what Palin is doing. Both candidates want things to be more transparent but not being able to see all of Palins records, and McCain helping her hide them is like Stalinism. Russia uses the same tactics to keep its population in the dark.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 17, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
Well, actually she’s more translucent…you can see right through her but ideas get scattered when you bounce them off of her.
Posted by: KenB, MI | September 17, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
I think the real story here is in how she is handling this controversy. Public life is filled with controversy. Being transparent is the first requirement of a public servant. Those who try to obfuscate the truth and claim to be above the law because they are public servants .. are not public servants. LOL They are people who consider themselves masters and owed rights that the rest of us are not.
Posted by: Dave | September 17, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Corporate Stalinists are those, who use a vail of secrecy, to hide behind. Sounds like Palin now.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 17, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
My question now is, will Palin only answer scripted questions? All canidates: Obama, Biden, McCain and Palin should be asked ‘gothca’ questions to catch them off guard. They are all only human. Hannity can ask good questions, but I know he favors her, so how tough will his questions be. O’Rilley grilled Obama. I would like to see him on Hannity and Combs.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 17, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am
This is *such* an important issue to pursue, since her answers on the issue and investigation have changed so much. All the evasion and “offense” makes it looks like something fishy was going on. What reporter will break through this?
Posted by: sally | September 17, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am
Jake,
I think it’s egregiously misleading for you to mention Obama’s “broken promise” on public financing without mentioning the much greater sin: McCain’s use and misuse of the public financing system to keep his campaign alive and withdrawal when he didn’t need it any more.
Posted by: Greg M | September 17, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Yes, she is a fraud. Republicans wished we would be living in ex-communist Russia: No questions, no vetting, do as I say, if you ask questions you hate America.They are manipulating the truth and blaming everybody besides themselves, A FIASCO, LEAVE US ALONE, Americans are not that stupid!
Posted by: carmen | September 17, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Sarah Palin is abusing her position as governor. I have researched and followed this investigation – “Troopergate” – since she was chosen Republican Vice President. Huge problems of abuse are there!! Legislature vote for investigation 100% – Republicans and Democrats. Then voted who would be on committee. Voted to hire private investigator. Approved attorney Branchflower. Evidence has already been submitted that is damaging to Sarah Palin. That evidence is what was presented to legilature.
McCain Campaign has come in. Problems present. Claims Democrats problem. But forget 10 Republicans and only 4-5 Democrats on committee.
Sarah with hold information. Claims “executive privilege”. Sarah Palin and her administration use private email accounts in secrecy to avoidance Public REcords Act.
Divorce Court Records reveal Palin Family claims Trooper Wooten dangerous were only by Palin family themselves. No good planning, startegies to catch Wooten is he is danger. No audio ttapes, no video tapes, no documentation, no outside witnesses. One Protection Order was given, but never extended as family provided no proof. Court transcripts reveal divorce trial judge warned Palin Family to stop vendetta to have Wooten fired. That was three years ago. Vendetta continued. Trooper Wooten continues to pursuing this vendetta to destroy Wooten. This is a personal issue. If Wooten is a threat – Palin family could lodge new complaint with their local police department. Palin family could sue in court.
Sarah Palin political history reveals similiar patterns. Personal feelings seem to become issue in business
Whole investigation is a total cover-up.
This lady is lying about this!! American this lady is dangerous!!
Posted by: Sharonklim | September 17, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
How is this even a question at this point?
It’s like asking “How altruistic will Wall Street remain?”
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 17, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Sara actually is transparent, we can see right through her! – and we can see Russia too!
Posted by: Remember November | September 17, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Ruth Marcus:
“Ideological differences aside, John McCain’s campaign has been more dishonest, more unfair, more –
to use a word that resonates with McCain — dishonorable than Barack Obama’s.
Ideological differences aside, John McCain’s campaign has been more dishonest, more unfair, more — to use a word that resonates with McCain — dishonorable than Barack Obama’s. McCain’s transgressions, though, are of a different magnitude. His whoppers are bigger; there are more of them. He — the easy out would be to say “his campaign” — has been misleading, and at times has outright lied, about his opponent. He has misrepresented — that’s the charitable verb — his vice presidential nominee’s record. Called on these fouls, he has denied and repeated them. “
Posted by: Jazzman | September 17, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
It’s hilarious that she uses a yahoo account to avoid subpoena, containing mail with subject lines of “confidential ethics investigations” and other government matters, and then she loses her pass to that account to a bunch of pranksters.
Transparent? Please.
Incompetent? Yes.
Posted by: Kb | September 17, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Almost forgot,
She does not practice simple computer security as governor. Should she be an unstable old man’s heart beat away from running the military? NO.
Posted by: Kb | September 17, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Is this candidate for real! As VP would she risk national security because she is so obsessed with secrecy that she’d bypass a secure account and use yahoo? A lot more dangerous things could happen than having a thrill-seeking hacker get sensitive information. That’s some maverick.
Posted by: enry | September 17, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Maybe when she is president she’ll have the good sense to put the nuclear codes in a cookie jar.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 17, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
It is ironic that someone in virtual hiding from the press is talking about transparency.
Posted by: Puat | September 17, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
First of all, tying Sen. McCain – especially on the issue of immigration reform – to Limbaugh is unfair.
Limbaugh opposed McCain on that issue.
McCain flipped-flopped and NOW supports Limbaugh’s position.
Posted by: Steve J. | September 18, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Lay off Palin – go after someone you really can’t trust – OBAMA/MICHELLE!
Posted by: Jill | September 18, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Can anyone in this blog PROVE it was truly her email that was hacked? The onions satire on Obama looked just as real and probably contained more accurate subject lines.
Posted by: S.P. | September 18, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm