I’ll Try to Find Ya Some and I’ll Bring ‘Em to Ya
Watching the CBS interview of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin did not exactly fill conservative columnist Kathleen Parker with confidence.
"Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who Is Clearly Out Of Her League," Parker writes today.
"No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted."
Parker writes that "If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true."
She suggests that Palin should "bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first.
"Do it for your country."
Conservatives, what say you? Is Parker on target or completely off?
- jpt
UPDATE: Based on the growing unease about Palin among conservatives — for what they assert is a lack of preparedness, not for any ideological reasons — this post will launch a series called "Conservatives Embarrassed About Palin." We’ve been covering Sen. Joe Biden’s speaking proclivities in our "Oh, That Joe!" series; this will be the GOP counterpart.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Oh dear! here we go. Finally someone did notice. I thought I was alone. Was Mcsame really serious picking this woman? I have nothing against her but she is completely out of her depth here and she sould do the honourable thing for the sake of every American woman who aspire for the high office and resign. I’m sure we can find really brillant Republican women to fill the ticket if we look harder.
Posted by: Repman | September 26, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am
The truth is she makes Dan Quail look like Bill Clinton
Posted by: jim | September 26, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am
No going to go there.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 26, 2008, 7:01 am 7:01 am
So…. 3 weeks is it?
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 26, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am
Jake, I’m not a conservative, but I agree with Parker that watching Palin is a cringefest of the highest order.
However, the bulk of what she says causes me great consternation, particularly in these areas:
1) Yes, Joe Biden occasionally suffers from foot-in-mouth disease. However, given the breadth of his knowledge and the amount of campaigning he’s doing, occasional gaffes are expected. Palin’s unscripted appearances are few and far between and she is incapable of speaking to his level of expertise on any subject, except possibly Alaska’s proximity to Russia.
2) This comment of Parker’s, “bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first.” reeks of sexism and serve only to harm women’s pursuit of higher office. Those of us who criticized Palin for putting her career ahead of her family, in particular her special needs child and 17-year-old daughter especially in need of privacy, were severely taken to task by conservative and Republican supporters. And yet that now becomes an acceptable reason for her to withdraw? Once again, the hypocrisy of the Republicans stuns me, even though I know that I should expect no less.
Posted by: DebM | September 26, 2008, 7:02 am 7:02 am
I am still amazed as a Republican that the party had no better candidates to offer than a 72 year old man and Sarah (Bimbo) Palin. I guess after we elected George W. Bush twice it proves we can elect anyone! We could have just waited for “America Has Talent” contest to pick our next president. Well at least we have a VP that every man wants to…..well you know!
Posted by: Joe B. Long | September 26, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am
Palin has shown herself to be disastrous already! To anyone even CONSIDERING voting for McCain: Please watch the Couric or Gibson interview first! Are YOU willing to risk America’s future with Palin and the man who said she was the most qualified person to be VP? I wonder who he would appoint to the Supreme Court and cabinet – more clueless ex-beauty queens? As a woman, I am so disappointed and disgusted with McCain.
OBAMA/BIDEN!
Posted by: Leah Williams | September 26, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am
The position should have never been offered to by McCain, and she should not have accepted. They were both woefully irresponsible in this regard.
Not only is it an afront to women that are fully qualified to be a Vice Presidental choice, it’s insulting to every woman that doesn’t want to be viewed as a bobble-head doll.
Not. Ready. Deal.
Posted by: Penny | September 26, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am
Palin is definitely out of her league. I suspect that she was out of her league as governor as well and that would have been increasingly obvious the longer she was in office.
My guess is that when she returns to private life, she will get help writing a book blaming the Republican campaign difficulties on McCain’s hot temper.
Posted by: Joel | September 26, 2008, 7:07 am 7:07 am
I am left totally speechless by this interview. It doesn’t seem possible. What does this say about Mc Cain’s judgement? It is frightening.
Posted by: Dem | September 26, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am
Jake, what McSame has done to Palin is to use her as usual. McCian has used his first wife and got rich out of his second wife and wants to get to the White House through Sarah Palin. Unfortunately this time around he has chosen the worst horse because looking at Sarah it is like asking a light weight boxer to take on a heavy weight boxer, she comes out like asking a high school student to do a PhD, she is exhausted and is not ready for this job. She is not that kind of person, her IQ is not high better than McSame’s but still managing the largest economy in the world, the only one superpower in the world is not a Miss Alaska contest. God save America from McPalin. God bless America and God bless Obama.
Posted by: BKMC | September 26, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am
The woman is a complete moron. What’s even more amazing is that McCain, who i used to think was a pretty good guy, picked her. I’m sorry but he’s gone around the bend.
Posted by: Steve | September 26, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am
Did it really take this long to figure this out? Out of league.
It’s not a personal attack, she simply isn’t ready for the job.
Even the infomercial with Hannity didn’t make Palin look prepared.
She an probably do fine in an oil rich state that only has 650,000 people. But no way this person should be a national leader.
Perhaps someone SHOULD have “told her what the Vice President does” before she agreed to run.
Posted by: Reality sets in | September 26, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am
This is sad McCain made a big mistake and now it shows big time ,,,,
Posted by: indp voter | September 26, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am
Criticisms of Governor Palin’s lack of readiness to run the country if needed are legitimate. I, for one, am weary of the sexism card. This has no more to do with sexism than it does Alaskaism or Big Hairism.
Posted by: Steve | September 26, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
It’s gratifying that people are at last coming around to saying this. After her convention speech you’d have thought it was the second coming – despite the fact that her speech was written by someone else, and only had her snide flippant delivery to recommend it. I’ve been saying ever since McCain tapped her that this is a ridiculous insulting choice. Clearly McCain didn’t want someone smarter than him, so he had to shop around.
Posted by: jon in maryland | September 26, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
McCain wanted Liberman.
Most ‘pubs wanted Romney.
“Maverick” was TOLD to take Palin.
Not much of a “maverick” as far as I can see. He didn’t even stand up to chose his own running mate.
And who is running the Republican Party? I’d like to know. Because it will be the same unelected people that will run our country if McCain and Palin pull off their smokescreen.
Posted by: Maverick McCain was Killed by Candidate McCain | September 26, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
Stunning.
Posted by: Lia | September 26, 2008, 7:33 am 7:33 am
Palin is sinking the McCain campaign with these interviews. She clearly is not competent AT ALL. It’s enormously embarrassing to see her stumble after getting some basic questions. I agree with Parker: bow out NOW, so that McCain will still have a chance of winning in November. The polls and her unfavorability ratings show that she is ALREADY hurting the ticket.
Posted by: Texan Deal | September 26, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am
I don’t agree with all points of this and yes I am voting for McCain.
1. I have seen equally bad tapes of Obama.
2. This woman went from three weeks ago being a governor of Alaska to this. Is she stupid? No and you know she is not. She has been trust into a quite a different situation from her former one. The same goes for Obama who clearly showed that he does not know how to deal with a crises when he answered “They will call me if they need me”.
3. Even Tom Brokaw admitted that most politicians would not know every bill that their running mate passed that was for regulation. He felt that she is being drilled on stupid issues and should be asked questions about how she will actually deal with issues rather than given these stupid GOTCHA questions designed to make the interviewer look good and Sarah bad. Had Obama been asked the same question he too would have been stomped. Remember she is not a senator. She is a governor.
3. Her inability to answer the question proved that she does not know McCains senate voting record in her sleep. I wouldn’t expect her to. At least she did not spin BS which is what Obama (who is at the TOP of the ticket) would have.
4. Quayle could not spell potato. Did no know the composition of Mars.
5. Small Town America Vs. East Coast or Big City Folks. Look, in my opinion I think it is great that someone from a diverse background can be a VP candidate. When I say diverse I am not referring to race. I mean a different background, non ivy league, someone who worked herself up to governor from local levels.
Is she as polished as the others? NO
Is she as jaded? No- which is a good thing.
Is overwhelmed? Yes but she is human and we have known her for a month. She has had to deal with intense scrutiny and campaign trips, debriefings, etc.
So does her answer to Couric, make me not want to vote for Mccain? NO.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Funny, to me, she sounds no different from the other times I’ve heard her speak. Why are people making a big deal about this interview?
Anyway, at least people are finally seeing her for what she is.
Posted by: MAtt | September 26, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am
Jake, you forgot to put up a link to Kathleen Parker’s full column. It’s on the Townhall site, columnists section, ‘The Palin Problem’.
I fully agree with Parker. Palin is proving to be an even worse pick than Quale.
And she’s ENORMOUSLY hurting the image of women in politics. McCain picked the dumbest of them all. Shame on him.
Posted by: kathy | September 26, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
Maverick McCain – Look at the names on the Project for a New American Century website. Those are the men behind the curtain. That bunch of lunatics has been running the show since January 2001, and they’re the ones whose drumbeat Candidate McCain is marching to.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Posted by: Fred | September 26, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
So let me get this straight. Parker thinks the media has been EXCUSING Palin because she is a woman. What a joke. She has been attacked left and right because she IS A WOMAN. And the “ya”s in the headline. Just because she talks like the folks and not the professorial talking head Obama, doesn’t mean she doesn’t know what she is talking about. Good working finding the conservative against Palin, Tapper. Keep up the outstanding journalism!!
Posted by: Dan Petre | September 26, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
As l’ve always said this sarah palin pick goes on to tell us about john McCain’s judgment and temperament.
l honestly and sincerely hope the american pple are taking this elections as seriouly as it should be taken,ON THE ISSUES,not on a pretty bimbo.
OBAMA-BIDEN 4 PRESIDENT AND V.P
Posted by: nicky | September 26, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
As Newsweek said of Palin this week: “A celebration of the joyful marriage of confidence and ignorance”
Posted by: clifton | September 26, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
3 days in seclusion being coached on how to debate foreign policy $600,00.00
Hiring a skilled debate faux opponent to practice with $300,000.00
Research assistants to feed you information on every topic imaginable $250,000.00
Being outsmarted by your opponent so that you are unable to make use of any of it just before the big debate….PRICELESS
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Palin has not been McCain’s OWN choice, I’m sure. He only met her once, as we know.
It must have been Davis or someone else in the campaign who convinced McCain that he needed a woman on the ticket to attract disappointed Hillary supporters.
But even then they made the wrong choice. Huckabee is a beacon of Enlightenment in comparison to Palin. And as ‘woman in politics’, Palin is a squirrel in comparison to puma Clinton.
Now he’s stuck with her, trying to keep the press away from her, which is a ridiculous and embarrassing piece of political comedy.
Palin should decide to bow out, yes. She must feel that isn’t up to the Real Thing yet. She can’t be happy about her silly performances. She knows by now that she’s hurting McCain.
Sarah, PLEASE go home. Thanks but no thanks!
Posted by: Ron | September 26, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
It is about time somebody spoke up and more people need to do so. This is such an embarassment
Posted by: Hilda | September 26, 2008, 7:54 am 7:54 am
You hit the nail directly upon the head. This is a nightmare. Honestly – forget partisanship. If McCain were healthy and younger, I wouldn’t be so worried about her chances of being President.
Posted by: UltraConservative | September 26, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am
Her interview was awful. It was a lot of bad answers, generic responses and she has no confidence at all. It was truly sad to watch and I feel bad for her.
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: McCain = BUSH | September 26, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am
It’s ironic that when Sarah Palin run for Ms. Beauty IN Alaska, she was beat by a black woman with real talent, even though black population in Alaska is so low, so go figure. Sarah was given the consolation title of “Ms. Congeniality without really earning it.
Soon, she’ll be crowned “Mrs. Nowhere”, but this time she’ll really have EARNED it.
Posted by: El Mugroso | September 26, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am
Palin’s responses remind of something that’s always painful to watch; pretty girls in a Miss contest having to answer to general questions about their world view. And then only the mute button can save their grace.
Since we’re talking a VP candidate here, that’s more than embarrassing: it’s frightening, certainly in a time of two wars and an immense economic crisis.
The White House clearly is no place for Miss Wasilla.
So yes, do the right thing and please bow out. Show some judgment. Alaska will embrace ya.
Posted by: ken | September 26, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
It seems bizarre that the liberal media would link this “conservative column” to their website. ABC is not interested in the Republican point of view…unless it agrees with their point of view.
Posted by: Vicki Williams | September 26, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Clearly, Palin was nervous and tongue tied. I still think highly of Plain and think the chattering class is selling her short. Palin is genuine, adds more to the ticket than her inexperience takes away, and will rise to the occasion. Wait for the debate.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 26, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
It was painful watching Sarah Palin in her interviews with Gibson and Couric.
I cringed when I listened to Palin’s answers to questions Couric asked. Palin’s responses were pitiful!!!! She used a lot of words but didn’t say anything!!!!!!!!!
Anyone can tell she is out of her league.
Palin should have the wherewithal to call it quits. She is drowning!
McCain you made a GIANT mistake in selecting Sarah Palin!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Shay | September 26, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
During the Couric interview she reminded me of a doll with a pull string repeating McCain’s talking points over and over again. We should seriously question McCain’s judgement in picking Palin. Our first chance to see his decision making skills and he seriously blew it.
Posted by: Liz | September 26, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
McCain would have been much better off choosing Tina Fey for his VP because she has a brain to go with the body. I don’t think McCain wants to be surrounded by people with brains.
Posted by: hamishdad | September 26, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
What worries me more she is looking more like dubya who last nite as paul begala said was looking like a high-functioning moron given this bailout crisis send paulson former ceo goldmine sachs who basically has been carrying his water to congress even republicans ignored bush and boehner did most of the talking while super mccain[who came to save the day] kept quiet, never gain we must elect a blank slate sadly the are americans who are stupid and will again elect a bush clone with likes of cheneys putting their language on that blank slate.
Posted by: james | September 26, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Ouch. I know she’s not dumb but she looked like an average Jane, not a governor or politician. I’ve never seen a politician have that much of a loss for words.
I disagree with some of you. It was beyond a simple misstatement or gaffe, or being unpolished. She looked nervous for crying out loud. Nervious?!? That’s human, but very unbecoming of a leader. For whatever reason we expect our leaders to be cool under pressure, even when they’re lying or dead wrong or have no clue how to answer a question.
That speech alone could swing Obama another 1% in the polls. Geez.
Posted by: kevin | September 26, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Although I am not overly impressed with Sara Palin, I believe she is sincere and refreshing compared to the smooth talking bombasts we are used to seeing. I am, however, even less impressed with Katie Curic. I thought her interview was less an attempt to learn more about the candidate and more of an “I gotcha” attempt. There was no reason to grill her on what John McCaine has accomplished in the Senate. Palin’s first answer of his warning regarding Fannie and Freddie was a sufficient answer. When Curic persisted I would have told her to interview McCaine if she wanted to talk about his Senate career. Curic is in over her head…she came across as mean spirited and I think CBS should send her packing to a market where professionalism is not a job requirement.
Posted by: Meg | September 26, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
Palin proves that ANYONE can be picked for VP
Posted by: Gus | September 26, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
Anyone that would vote for McCain/Palin has a death wish.
Posted by: Jackson in NC | September 26, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Hyperbole and embellishment upstaged by McCains world
That McCain still has ANY chance, given after what has occurred on Wall Street, and given that Phil Gramm will probably be the Secretary of the Treasury and his closest economic adviser, is evidence that America seems to be on a death march.
The inability of the average person to grasp the significance of any of this seems to be on vivid display.
This was before the Katie Couric interview of Sarah Palin.
We are now witnessing truly delusional statements by McCain supporters, who are willing to elect someone they don’t really like backed by a VP who makes Bush seem like a gifted orator and thinker. Eight years of horrible leadership will be followed by four more years of EVEN WORSE LEADERSHIP.
Obama, in referring to McCain, said at least he (McCain) will be an improvement over Bush. He was very, very wrong. These are the good old days sad to say.
Posted by: JJW | September 26, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
I am a woman and i real feel hurt by this.People who will vote for Mc./Pl should remember this will hurt women to be higher office in the future.If we know now is not ready then republican should pressure mcain to choose another strong woman somewhere.Otherwise American people will not risk their votes to any woman in higher office in the future whether it is republican or democratic we will be viewed the same.And that is so annoying.If you can not vote for Obama/Biden for whatever reasons then just don’t vote and let it go.It is real a shame.
Posted by: niter | September 26, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Sarah Palin’s dumb answers on what special situation gives her credit for “foreign relations” clearly show that she is not aware that the Russia she refers to is best known as Siberia, with an average population of 3 people per square mile! PLUS, Siberia has always been a place to which ‘bad’ citizens are sent for punishment (exile, prison, force labor, etc.) and that indeed, from some island of Alaska, it may be possible to see the tip. This is what one used to learn in the FIFTH grade, and now it qulifies any one for Vice President! Good grief!
Posted by: El Mugroso | September 26, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
OBAMA: Uh, uh, are, uh, uh, uh, um. That’s — that’s a bunch — so — so let me tick these off. Deh… Uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, um, uh. So the issue is not a perception that, uh… Weh, weh, let me put it this way. Uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, We’re — we’re trying to — you know, we’ve got a bipartisan group here and — and — and, uh, uh, uh, uh, um, uh, uh, uh.
THIS IS AN ACTUAL TRANSCRIPT
OBAMA: With respect to the surge, you know, we don’t know what would have happened if the plan that I put forward in January 2000 — How many questions — okay. That’s a bunch. I’m going to have to get a pen for all these triple questions you guys are — you know, it-it-it’s always a bad practice to say always or never. These are difficult questions. I’m just trying to get to everybody. I’ll take the second question first. I’ve been very clear on that. I — I was gonna save some of these comments until I — I actually have these conversations tomorrow. Uh, it wasn’t that we were avoiding the issue. I need you to speak up. You were speaking up very loudly when you wanted me to call on you.
SOUNDS NERVOUS TO ME AND NOT VERY CONFIDENT.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
Palin is a complete joke. As European I am deeply ashamed that you would even consider this individual for high office…It makes the rest of us guys in the western world look really bad:-). I have watched all three interviews with her and she comes across as naive and unprepared…Hmmmm.
Good luck with the election!
Posted by: jacob nielsen | September 26, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am
McCain felt he “deserved” to kick his first, disabled wife to the curb to marry (not mention philander with) a beer heiress 17 years his junior. Cretins like Hannity even use that rationalization. “He was a P.O.W.. Why not?!”
Now he feels he “deserves” to be President before he kicks, and he will say or do any political ploy to get it, even though Mr. “Country First” probably knows he’s dying. And he will leave the country he puts “first” with . . . this.
I am a former Reagan Republican. If you vote for McCain, what are you really thinking?
Posted by: JJ | September 26, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
It is really sad once analyze why McCain select Palin for running mate.
The only criterion was how he could win this election despite the best interest of the country and the American DO YOU Remember Governor Romney? spent the last year campaigning for the Republican presidential nomination and talking to the American people about the importance of strengthening our economy,
We are listening Sarah Plain overconfident untrained rigid and answering with out vacillation .Yes I am ready to be President like that job is similar to a manager position on the local Wall Mart .
Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin may have little experience in foreign policy, but she’s explains Alaska-Russia Foreign Policy Remark”
Did you know I can see Russia from my house?
Did you know I said Thanks but not thanks to the bridge to nowhere?
Did you know me and senator McCain we are in a mission from God!
Like the Blues Brothers! Vice- President responsibilities ?
First to be Senator McCain cheerleader, and second if he die I will bomb Russia!
If I am ready to be President? Of course I will never blink
Posted by: foreclosure | September 26, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
When asked by Pastor Rick Warren. “Who are the three wisest people you know in your life and who you are you going to rely on heavily in your administration?”
Barack answered. “You mentioned one person I’d be listening to and that’s Michelle, my wife, who is not only wise but she’s honest. And one of the things you need, I think any leader needs, is somebody who can get up in your face and say, ‘boy, you really screwed that one up.’”
Chist! Is he kidding? He followed that inane response with one even more ludicrous. He said this.
“Another person in that category is my grandmother, who’s an extraordinary woman. She was never went to college. (A little grammar faux pas I’m sure. I’m taking this quote directly off the transcript.) She worked on a bomber assembly line during World War II when my grandfather was away, came back, got a job as a secretary, worked her way up to become a bank vice president before she retired and she’s just a very grounded common sense, no fuss, no frill, kind of person. And when I’ve got big decisions I often check in with her.”
OBAMA IS THIS THE SAME GRANDMOTHER THAT YOU CALLED A TYPICAL WHITE WOMAN?
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Articles about Palin’s interviews have been too kind. She has no working knowledge of English grammar and couldn’t put two coherent sentences together, especially in the Couric interview. If Biden or Obama attempted to answer questions like she did, they would have graduated from college. Palin cannot handle the press unless she has the questions in advance and has time to rehearse her answers. Do we really want her representing our country overseas? She will be the laughingstock of the world!
Posted by: Voting Mom | September 26, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
At this point, any Conservative who defends Sarah Palin as even remotely ready for the job is surrendering any claim to credibility. If you care about your nation, you must acknowledge that this is someone who is in way over her head. And it would literally imperil the country to have her ascend to the office. Those who still advocate for her are nothing short of undignified.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | September 26, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
I feel so sorry for Sarah Palin. I lost respect for McCain. Sarah is a setback to intelliegent capable women,yet some of them are willing to put their hard work at risk to support her just because she is a woman and a republican. They should be angry that she has be abused. And what about the sexism displayed by our visitors comment’you’r beautiful—-can I get a hug’. A strong ready to enter the world woman would not have been approached that way. I bet Condee Rice doesnot get that nor Hillary Clinton. If a U.S. citizen had said that to her the news would have gone to the Farmers Market. This whole situation is just horrible.
Posted by: Carolyn | September 26, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Ok, Jake, she should have said McCain -Feingold or McCain-Kennedy or McCain-Lieberman. But what if Sen. Biden had been surprised by some question about specifics of Sen. Obama’s record. He probably made something up on fly along the lines of FDR went on TV to assure America after the crash of 1929! Imagine if Gov. Palin had said something so ridiculous. The MSM collective heads would’ve exploded. Jake, read Tony Blankley’s Washington Times editorial and then read it again. How come the MSM does not ask tough gotcha questions of Sen. Obama? The MSM have disgraced themselves this campaign.
Posted by: Stevereno | September 26, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
McCain = Bad judgement
In a personality contest…Palin surely wins. But it is SCARY she is this close to running America
Posted by: watching | September 26, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
I am neither republican nor democratic, but I am seriously wounded by how the republican party is portraying women as epitomized by their shielding and ‘barbie’ presentation of Palin. I am a full time working mother of 3, with two post graduate degrees, one of which I earned after having my third child. My children are always with family members and have never been with a sitter and I work in a mostly male-dominated field. I strive to juggle it all, and with the support of my husband and family, we are making it work. Women CAN do it ALL, however, McCain’s campaign is showcasing how biased they are against the belief that women can compete equally, presenting her as just a pretty face who is not trusted to say what she REALLY thinks for fear she will say something wrong. This is not the media’s fault completely, they are feeding off the image McCain’s camp has portrayed of her. It ANNOYS the heck out of me, and I hope McCain lives to regret this portrayal of working moms.
Posted by: shiny | September 26, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Although I am not overly impressed with Sara Palin, I believe she is sincere and refreshing compared to the smooth talking bombasts we are used to seeing. I am, however, even less impressed with Katie Curic. I thought her interview was less an attempt to learn more about the candidate and more of an “I gotcha” attempt. There was no reason to grill her on what John McCaine has accomplished in the Senate. Palin’s first answer of his warning regarding Fannie and Freddie was a sufficient answer. When Curic persisted I would have told her to interview McCaine if she wanted to talk about his Senate career. Curic is in over her head…she came across as mean spirited and I think CBS should send her packing to a market where professionalism is not a job requirement.
How long are we going to blame the media for everything??It does not take a lot to look at someone and know she is not ready.She might be very intelligent but she is not ready we all agree.Being a VP position it is not having the wright answers but at least you know how to answer them in a smart way and calm.If you act this way when you talk to foreign leaders they will underestimate your brain as well as your power.We need a someone who knows at least how to answer even if it is not the answer we want but with a substance .She seems to talk so many things and sometimes forget what the question was.Remember if you are not ready for the exam just post phoned the class or re schedule the exam and don’t just go for it.You will embar. yourself and others.
Posted by: niter | September 26, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Carolyn my wife is very attractive and has a law degree and still gets approached that way. Sarah Palin is attractive and a smart cookie. There are different types of intelligence. She reminds me of Truman. I think women are doing themselves a disservice by saying that she is dumb even if you really believe that. I think women did themselves a disservice by voting an empty suit on the DNC ticket over Hillary Clinton. Your party the DNC is the stupid one.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Thanks niter, I feel the same way about Obama. The Messiuh is not ready.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
This Kathleen Parker conclusion sums it up:
“If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself. ”
That’s right, but BS is no currency, so Palin please go home.
Posted by: hank | September 26, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Palin is real and I love it!
Democrat for McCain/Palin
Posted by: bobPhil | September 26, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Well at least we all know why The McCain people are keeping Sarah away from the press. Geeze, was there no other Republican available?
Posted by: jenny | September 26, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Why are we Republicans fooling ourselves on this miserable VP pick?
If Palin were any good, the campaign would let her talk to the press as often as possible. Free publicity, remember? Air time. Get the message out.
Instead, they’re hiding her. That tells me more than enough.
If she doesn’t bow out, she’ll be the knife in McCain’s back.
Posted by: merilyn | September 26, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
“I am, however, even less impressed with Katie Curic. I thought her interview was less an attempt to learn more about the candidate and more of an “I gotcha” attempt. ………… Curic is in over her head…she came across as mean spirited and I think CBS should send her packing to a market where professionalism is not a job requirement.”
Posted by: Meg | Sep 26, 2008 8:18:50 AM
————————-
Good job, Meg! Your candidate does poorly, then you go out and beat the interviewer. Priceless! If this was a debate and the moderator was unfair to one candidate, I would concur with your ridiculous assessment. But to suggest that it was mean of Couric to press on Ms. Palin to give examples of where John McCain had shown himself to be a regulator? Just go with your Fox News gang. You all just want the media to dumb down to propaganda. The scary thing is, some in the media fall for this pressure. They’d rather have viewers then stick to their professionalism. The media has the choices of dumbing down to our levels, or informing and educating us.
Posted by: D | September 26, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Bob -She is real alright. Real unprepared to be VP.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | September 26, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Palin is not ready. Period.
Even when Couric didn’t ask her about foreign policy-her weaker one, but domestic one, Palin tripped up without Couric having to do anything. I watched her interview and she has a habit of NOT answering the question, or ending up going into a false start.
I don’t know if it’s on purpose or if she’s just got the jitters or she can’t help it, but it’s certainly worrying.
Obama has less experience. So? Experience must be coupled with judgement and competence. All I see is McCain rapidly flip-flopping on the economy, wanting to continue the “Shoot first talk later” sort of foreign policy that has only earned us more enemies. Obama keeps his cool and doesn’t get flustered- what we need for a President to deal with a crises in a considered manner.
Look what happened the last time someone decided to jump into a war without getting all the facts.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am
D, I agree.
Even if the interviewer is being biased– and she clearly was not in this case- surely a potential or President or vice President should be able to deal with that? If they cannot even deal with a biased media, how are they going to deal with people like Ahmadinejad or Putin?
Obama went on O’Reilly and at the end of it Bill admitted Obama was a tough guy.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Obama has said he is open to talks with Iran-with some sort of conditions.
Thank you, but I do not want one more war to add to the two other messes to deal with in the Middle-East. I guess that’ll open up the bill from $12 billion per month to oh, maybe only around $20 billion?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
“Obama went on O’Reilly and at the end of it Bill admitted Obama was a tough guy. ”
In fact O’Reilly after his long interview with Obama admitted that we now was convinced that Obama is “tough and sincere”.
Both are great qualifications for an American President.
I’m not convinced Palin was qualified to be a mayor of Wasilla. She left that job leaving Wasilla under the burden of an unprecedented financial debt.
Now think of Palin running the regulation of Wall Street…
Posted by: trenton | September 26, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
So much was made of those that jumped on the McCain bandwagon after Palin joined the “team.” Not much has been said about those of us that moved firmly from undecided to Obama after this stunt by McC. Obama has given thousands of interviews, and it’s easy to find gaffes here and there. Palin has given two interviews at length and there are gaffes throughout. Enthusiastic incompetents are the most dangerous people to put into leadership.
Posted by: Jay | September 26, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Cult of Personality,
I think a few uhs here and there when he pauses to formulate his answer instead of responding right off the cuff and shooting his mouth off is better.
McCain:Check my website! (in response to a reporter’s question on his policy)
Turns out the info wasn’t even there.
Palin: You know, you can see Russia from Alaska!
Great. The whole world is laughing, I bet.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
OBAMA: Let me be absolutely clear. Israel is a strong friend of Israel’s. It will be a strong friend of Israel’s under a McCain government, administration. It will be a strong friend of Israel’s under an Obama administration. So that policy is not going to change.
Break transcript
Now, we all know that he didn’t mean to say Israel is a strong friend of Israel?
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
trenton,
Exactly. The whole Wasilla mess thing happened because they didn’t properly acquire the land to build their sports complex or something, and ended up spending millions on a lawsuit.
And we cannot have a VP who is shielded from the media. In the interests of accountability, we need her to be upfront. I mean, we don’t want another Bush fiasco, like how they hid some other pet projects in the Iraq war emergency budget or something.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
We should be more worried when the candidate appears CLEARLY out of touch.
McCain first says the fundamentals of the economy are strong. Okay, fine, maybe that was misconstrued. But then he said he didn’t support the bail out.
A few hours later : I support the bail out!
A FEW hours LATER: Hehe, actually I haven’t even read the bail out plan yet.
WHAT ON EARTH?!
I don’t know why people say Obama is elitist just because he got into the Ivy league. Isn’t the Naval Academy supposed to be a prestigious school too? Obama and Michelle own ONE car.
McCain and Cindy? THIRTEEN.
Enough said.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
I don’t know how many you added in, you see.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
Cult of Personality:
You’ve made you’re point. You’re voting for McCain no matter what. Please stop with the scripted campaign messages. We’ve gotten nothing but lies, deceptions, spin and distractions from McCain for months now, and your comments are much the same.
For the sake of my son and all America’s children and young people, if you can’t bring yourself to vote for Obama/Biden, just stay home on election day. Sarah Palin is unacceptable as a VP candidate and the thought of her ascending to the presidency is downright frightening.
Just this once, put your “country first” and not inflict this silly, unimpressive, unintelligent, inarticulate, booble head woman on our country. Please.
Posted by: Sean1211 | September 26, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
OBAMA: There’s a lot of history that exists between those two people. Uh, that history is not going to vanish overnight. People’s memories are long. There’s been bloodshed, and disputes that date back generations. Uh, and so I think it’s unrealistic to — to expect that a US president alone can suddenly snap his fingers and bring about peace in this region.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
“Well, there’s a lot of history exists between these two people.” Really Mr. obama? We didn’t know that. “That history is not going to vanish overnight” You mean between the Israelis and Palestinians? Really? That’s another thing we didn’t know! “People’s memories are long.”
Really Mr. obama????
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Grey matter that is the actual transcript
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
For someone who has no national TV exposure or experience, I’d say she’s doing remarkably well given all the hazing she’s going through. Keep up the good work, Gov. Palin.
Posted by: Emm | September 26, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Cult of Personality,
Isn’t that just about right? I think hes being realistic, not like McCain who goes around saying things like “bomb bomb bomb Iran”. In case you have forgotten, McCain, Iran is not made up of Ahmadinejad himself. There are plenty of normal Iranians who, even if they hate America’s guts, think it pretty stupid to start a war with a country who’s nuclear capability dwarfs theirs. They can’t even launch a missile over the ocean to hit us right now.
I know Obama’s transcripts are very interesting, but what has McCain got that you think is better? Care to share?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Cult of Personality: All you’re doing is making yourself look desperate to shore up your beliefs.
I can see why you’d struggle to defend Palin after this interview, but do you really think your posts are convincing anyone? Here’s a hint: when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
Posted by: Aengil | September 26, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Ouuuuuuuuuuch. Mute. Too painful to watch. Can you imagine? Poor thing…
Posted by: oooouuuuch | September 26, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Obama stupidity
1) There’s his statement about having campaigned in 57 states
2) May 8, 2007: In a campaign speech, he said 10,000 people had died in a tornado that hit Greensburg, Kansas a few days earlier. The death toll was 12.
3) “We only have a certain number of them (interpretors) and if they are all in Iraq, then it is harder for us to use them in Afghanistan.” Afghans speak Pushtu or Dari, languages not used at all in Iraq.
4) “I’m not very well known” in Kentucky compared to Hillary because of her husband and “her coming from a nearby state of Arkansas.” Illinois borders Kentucky; Arkansas does not.
I could go on, and on, and on.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Look, even if he says uh here and there, I notice it’s not because he doesn’t know what to say. He’s pausing to weigh his next words carefully.
Palin says uh to. So does McCain. Unlike Obama, however, Palin gave some pretty skipping-around-the-question sort of answers. I find it scary she says Perhaps So outright to the possiblity of a Russo-American war. Yes, some people say her words were misconstrued.
But the way she speaks is a nightmare for diplomacy. If the Russians wanted it so, they could keep replaying Perhaps So in their country to use as propaganda and fodder to start another war, and plenty of people wouldn’t know better. Nice.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Palin is Dan Quail in high heels.
Posted by: Nerbit | September 26, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
You’d have to be brainwashed by a cult in order to think that as VP would be ok. Pity doesn’t belong in presidential politics. If you can’t run with the big dogs – stay on the porch.
Posted by: oooooouch | September 26, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Obama: “One of the obvious high priorities in my talks with President Hugo Chavez would be the fermentation of anti-American sentiment in Latin America, his support of FARC in Colombia and other issues he would want to talk about.”
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
FERMENTATION???? MR. OBAMA DID YOU MEAN FORMENTATION?
OBAMA: Since the Bush Administration launched a misguided war in Iraq, its policy in the Americas has been negligent toward our friends, ineffective with our adversaries, disinterested in the challenges that matter in peoples’ lives, and incapable of advancing our interests in the region.
No wonder, then, that demagogues like Hugo Chavez have stepped into this vacuum.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
Sorry mr. Obama but Hugo Chavez came to power during the Clinton Administration, and was first elected President of Venezuela in 1998, two years before the Bush Administration took office.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am
Geez.
Biden has faced down dictators. Negotiated in the Yugoslav wars. Has more experience then even McCain. He makes a pretty solid pick and an excellent complement for Obama’s fresh ideas and youth.
Palin? She can’t hold the fort if something happens to McCain. I can’t believe she kept on repeating the “You can see Alaska from Russia” thing. Yeah, she’s given a crash course on foreign policy. Precisely. A CRASH COURSE.
Biden is definitely solid on foreign policy. Obama, we can’t deny he has less experience-but he knows his stuff. His studied political science and is on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Sure, a President has advisors. But they’re there to feed you info and factors about a situation, but not to teach you the whole thing from the scratch like we can see McCain doing for Palin.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Cult of Personality,
What he is talking about is that when have been wasting our time on a wild goose chase in Iraq, places in Venezuela, Chavez has been able to solidify his power because our attention is not on him. Yes, fermentation. Like something you know, manifesting or growing?
Yes, they have been negligent to our friends. “You’re either with us or not/ Axis of Evil” (which was used last to refer to Nazi Germany and the Japanese Empire).
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
LOL, Just the thought alone of McBush/Failin occupying the White House scares the heck out of me. Can you imagine?
JIff
Posted by: JIff Saunders | September 26, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
I think Bush may actually look good in comparison. I mean, Bush never threw so many Hail Marys and shot from the hip so often. McCain seems to get flustered way more easily then Bush. And Cheney would maul Palin in a comparison on foreign policy knowledge.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
And ss if Palin’s terribly bad week needed to get worse, the Washington Post reports that, as governor, Palin accepted over $25,000 in gifts:
“from industry executives, municipalities and a cultural center whose board includes officials from some of the largest mining interests in the state, a review of state records shows. About a quarter of the entities bestowing gifts on the governor are represented by one of Alaska’s most influential mining lobbyists, who said in an interview that she was not involved in the tributes. The lobbyist, Wendy Chamberlain, has a relationship with the governor’s family through the friendship of their teenage daughters.”
She may not be blinking, but the EXIT sign is.
Posted by: Poor Palin | September 26, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Ohhhhhhh, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, I forgot. Is this the one that he supposedly leads but hasn’t convened a single meeting? I guess it was getting in the way of his Gee, I’m bored of my 143 days of voting “present,” time to start my run for the Presidency and fulfill my destiny.
Posted by: Emm | September 26, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Oh dear. Reformer? Maverick?
Do you have a link we could have a look at?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Grey Matter, The United N invaded Iraq in response to a breached surrender treaty and nearly sixteen violated Security Council resolutions. We led the MNF. Obama’s statement makes him look just plain dumb.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
It’s not fair to compare Palin’s interviews to Biden’s gaffes. She hasn’t made any real gaffes or said anything like “FDR went on TV in 1929.” So why should she bow out? She’s not really an embarrassment and most of the stuff Olbermann makes fun of her for isn’t really that terrible.
Posted by: Lyndsi | September 26, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Emm, Obama isn’t the head of the foreign relations committee. And he has attended the meetings.
Voting present is used when Senators don’t completely agree with a bill’s specifics but agree on it’s message. It’s to send a signal that the bill should redrafted, not scrapped. Obama has casted only a measly 100 over present votes out of the over 4000 votes he has cast in the Illinois Senate. He’s sponsored a total of 136 bills since joining the US Senate.
Here’s two of the legislations he’s sponsored that has become law.
Coburn–Obama Transparency Act
Lugar–Obama Nonproliferation Legislation
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
AP-Washington lawyer Greg Craig will play the role of McCain in Obama’s debate rehearsals. Craig, a foreign policy expert and member of President Clinton’s impeachment defense team, also played President Bush in John Kerry’s preparations in 2004.”
Timing will kill you Obama.
3 days in seclusion being coached on how to debate foreign policy $600,00.00
Hiring a skilled debate faux opponent to practice with $300,000.00
Research assistants to feed you information on every topic imaginable $250,000.00
Being outsmarted by your opponent John Mccain so that you are unable to make use of any of it just before the big debate….PRICELESS
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
The UN did not invade Iraq. We invaded Iraq illegally, breaching the UNSC Resolution. The UN atomic agency carrying out their surveys had urged Bush to let them complete their report if he really wanted to jump into the mess, so he would have all the facts, as they had found little evidence of WMDs. Bush didn’t listen.
(I assume you’re talking about the most recent Iraq war?)
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
No, she’s not out of her league, and here’s why. Barack Obama has and is NOT able to answers questions on the fly without an enormous amount of hemming and hawing, just look at his performance yesterday morning, and the excuses thereafter. In fact, Sarah speaks better off the cuff. You are assessing her based on two journalists who did their utmost to “getcha” and prove to Americans that the far left Barack Obama press corps and the Obama campaign are right. Where are the articles about Joe Biden’s constant mistakes? Where are the articles about Barack Obama’s constant mistakes? Where are the gotcha interviews for those two men? Let’s sit Obama down and ask him gotcha questions as well while staring him down and daring him to hem and haw JUST ONCE! Sarah’s record in Alaska speaks for itself. Barack Obama has no record to speak for itself. In the current crisis he said call me if you need me. CALL ME IF YOU NEED ME! Where are the articles about that. Instead the AP comes out with an article to make it look like Obama and McCain equally left the campaign trail on their own merit to return to Washington to work on the bailout. Obama is still taking a backseat just to make sure he doesn’t come down on the wrong side of this bailout.
I would rather have a woman who cannot sit and lie at will when asked tough questions then a man who would be a call me if you need me President.
Stop drinking the koolaid Jake. I think better of you than that.
Posted by: Brenda | September 26, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Cult of Personality: “FERMENTATION???? MR. OBAMA DID YOU MEAN FORMENTATION?”
I sincerely doubt he meant ‘formentation’ because that’s not even a word. You’re thinking (and I use the term loosely) of ‘fomentation’, presumably in the sense of ‘encouragement, instigation’ rather than in the sense of ‘the application of flannels soaked in hot water’. But ‘fermentation’ is an equally correct term when used in the sense of ‘the state of being excited by emotion, passion; agitation’.
Seriously dude, you’re stretching so much you’re going to tear a ligament. Give it up already.
Posted by: Aengil | September 26, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
I cannot believe I once supported John McCain. There are scores of great, strong, informed, intelligent, tough, experienced Republican/ conservative women he could have picked – and he is a 72-year old man with cancer and some serious memory issues. What hubris to pick this woman. I honestly don’t know another woman – white, black, conservative, liberal, any party, any education level, who would have answered these questions – and Gibson’s questions so miserably. My Mom had a kid at 43 – she didn’t have a college education – she was vehemently pro-life. she was a real American woman – one who had honor and brains. She would have looked Couric straight in the eye and answered those questions – she actually read the newspapers and kept up on politics – apparently Sarah did not believe she needed to. She doesn’t even understand petroleum reserves in Alaska – and it is their top economic product and apparently served on some major board. How did this woman get to be Governor of any state?
Posted by: mara | September 26, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
I would agree that Palin appears to be just as incompetent as crazy old Uncle Joe. I would agree that she’s way out of her league. So was W. So was Carter.
The big difference between her and Uncle Joe is Uncle Joe is clearly on the back nine and those pesky little facts and figures are getting fuzzy. The gaffes are piling up to the point where it’s just not funny anymore. He’s a loose cannon. I find it ironic that Joe exemplifies everything you hear in the whisper campaign against McCain; he’s too old, stubborn, says things without thinking them through, has a temper, enjoys the politically incorrect joke and on and on.
There’s still hope for Palin. Maybe she could take some University of Phoenix political science classes to get up to speed, or memorize some Wiki pages on Congressional voting records of John McCain. Would that make everyone feel better?
Posted by: Woody | September 26, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Today’s Candidate Schedule
Where will the candidates be today?
Barack Obama
Oxford, Mississippi – Presidential Debate
Joe Biden
No public events scheduled
John McCain
Details may emerge during one of the many media interviews McCain is doing during his suspended campaign.
Sarah Palin
Protecting America from Russian invasion.
Posted by: Right | September 26, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
Smack on target. Palin is clearly grossly unqualified for this job. Many sensible conservatives are saying the same thing – Ross Douthat, for example, has come to the conclusion that she is unready.
Recall, McCain met her once, and decided she was a soulmate. This is typical McCain, going off half-cocked all the time. Well, lots of marriages based on the “soulmate” think end up falling apart, don’t they?
Posted by: Tungsten | September 26, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am
The McCain campaign is making two mistakes. Firstly, they continue to allow Palin to be baited about her lack of foreign policy experience. By constantly trying to insist that she has some, she just looks silly. Why not just admit that she doesn’t have any? She should then go on to say that foreign policy is John McCain’s area of strength, and that she was brought on to the ticket for domestic policy issues, particularly energy and anti-corruption. The public would be fine with that. After all, if foreign policy experience was the be all and end all, Bill Clinton would have lost to George H.W. Bush in 1992.
Secondly, by keeping Palin so tightly under wraps, the McCain campaign is ensuring that every interview she gives is scrutinized line by line. The media assumes they are trying to hide her, so of course when she gives an interview, she is held to a tougher standard. Let her off the leash and have her do a bunch of media – within a few days, the media will be tired of hearing from her, and a Sarah Palin interview will become old news. When she getting caught up in a stupid debate about her foreign policy credentials, she actually does just fine on the other questions.
Posted by: Dennis Prouse | September 26, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Aengil, your own candidate admitted that that fermentation was not what he meant. So why are you covering up and lying for him when he has already done that for himself?
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Brenda,
Obama has sponsored 136 bills since joining the US Senate. Two were signed into law by the president.
Palin’s record?
Oh SURE. Left her town swimming in debt after pushing through with building a sportshall without checking that they acquired the land properly- resulted in lawsuit that cost millions. Took earmarks, many times more per capita then Obama.Put her cronies in top positions and fired everyone else once she became governor. Asked for federal pork and supported the Bridge. And claimed she didn’t.
That’s nice Sarah. Couldn’t you have just admitted your mistake?
The Coburn-Obama Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 was supposed to help counter the kind of stunts Palin was pulling Alaska.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Prouse: outstanding analysis. I think their initial calculation was to maximize her impact by making press availability rare. This has backfired.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 26, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
There was a Memorial Day speech where Obama told the veterans in the audience that his uncle was among those who liberated Auschwitz. Really? So Obama’s uncle a member of the Russian Red Army? Of course, its just a technicality that Obama does not have an uncle, but a great uncle instead.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Enough about Palin. She’s not worthy.
For what about the top of the ticket?
How on earth does one make sense of it?
The last week, McCain has plunged from one gimmick to another, finally landing on this transparently cynical bid to “suspend” his campaign until a bailout deal – then returning to Washington to actually say nothing while the deal collapsed:
“At the bipartisan White House meeting that Mr. McCain had called for a day earlier, he sat silently for more than 40 minutes, more observer than leader, and then offered only a vague sense of where he stood, said people in the meeting.”
So, in rode the man on the white horse, whom no one really needed. And when he got there, he didn’t resolve the impasse, and he didn’t propose a plan. He just sat there, er, blinking.
Now he’s tied himself into the comic position that this deal isn’t made by tonight, he won’t show up at the debate.
It’s like a seventeen year old going to their room and slamming the door when he can’t be the center of attention.
Posted by: reed | September 26, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Dan – I’m sorry, but I disagree. I’ve lived everywhere in this country – farms in the midwest, California, many years in the south, a rural town in the Rockies and leaders go out of their way NOT to talk like Sarah Palin. My Dad didn’t have a high school education and he would never have spoken that way. The only people I’ve heard who actually talk that way are politicians like W who went to Yale but think they are supposed to sound like the “common man” to get elected. Sarah Palin opens her speeches by saying “Guys and Gals.” Try talking that way to “common people.” You’ll be ripped to pieces or laughed out of the room. She’s playing a part Charlie Black has given her to play – and I swear I am starting to feel sorry for her – she is playing it very, very badly. She is simply way, way, way out of her league. And the other sad thing is that there are so many decent, bright, experienced Republican women that McCain could have chosen if he wanted to play that card – but he didn’t. And it could set us all back. And put the country in an incredibly dangerous position. I think this woman could actually start WWIII. I think she would consider it a religious war. Remember the good old days, when Republicans talked about diplomacy and solvency?
Posted by: mara | September 26, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
“Aengil, your own candidate admitted that that fermentation was not what he meant. So why are you covering up and lying for him when he has already done that for himself?”
One: I’m an independent (although having said that, there’s absolutely no way I’m voting for McCain/Palin).
Two: You say he admitted it (which I don’t believe he did – got a source?) and then you say he’s covering up and lying. You’re even contradicting yourself now. I can see why you like Palin though. You make about as much sense as she does.
Third: Whether you like it or not, ‘fermentation’ IS a correct term to use in that context. Seriously, check a decent dictionary.
Posted by: Aengil | September 26, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Sara Palin is Shameless and clueless indeed. Watching her is so nausiating that I could hardly help myself. This is an insult to the intelligence of the voters of this great nation. Sara Palin is a grave and gathering danger to whatever remain of our country after Bush/cheney has decimated it. Sara should withdraw for the good of the nation. Her children needs her more than we do. Sara must go and go NOW.
Posted by: ed banks | September 26, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Cult of Personality,
What have you got to say about the UNSC Iraq thing? We DID invade Iraq illegally, but because we’re America we got away with it.
Now, could you please cite a source over the Auschwitz thing?
Obama’s grandfather did fight in the Second World War, anyway, you know?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
She needs to go, what exactly does she have to offer? Her ultra conservative ideals? America doesn’t need that.
Posted by: Kathy | September 26, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Brenda,
“You are assessing her based on two journalists who did their utmost to “getcha”"
Remember that answer you gave last time about being able to see Russia? What does that mean? You don’t know? GOTCHA!
Posted by: In the dark | September 26, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
What matters Grey matter is that is not what he said.
Breaking NEWS: The Commission on Presidential Debates should turn Friday’s planned debate between Barack Obama and John McCain into a town hall meeting with Obama if McCain does not attend, the chancellor of University of Mississippi told FOX News Friday morning.
Chancellor Robert Khayat said he is hopeful that McCain will “be on that stage” for the 9 p.m. EDT debate, but was meeting with commissioners to discuss the option.
“We’re going to urge the Presidential Debate Commission to have Senator Obama on stage and we’ll have a town meeting,” Khayat said.
GREAT OBAMA UNSCRIPTED. EXPECT MORE LIES AND UH UH’S
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
No wonder GOP have Sara on the leash. No wonder they want her to be seen and not heard. I am starting a “Withdraw Sara Campaign” from today. Sara should put her country first and go back to her children. This is a very dangerous time, a novice, arrogant, pompous, inept and enthusiatically incompetent brat will not help us. Sara must go and go now. She is not qualified.
Posted by: ed banks | September 26, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Palin is better than the slack jawed, open mouthed, Biden. What are the qualifications for office? It is currently being connected with the worst elements of our society. Palin will do a better job than all as she has the people’s interests first.
Shame on the media for being worse on her than they are on Biden. She is more qualified than Obama and more believable.
Posted by: dydx | September 26, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Palin is so wrong, I’m waiting to see what Barack Obama is going to do! Now I really don’t like her.
Posted by: Kathy | September 26, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
By the way Obama’s speeches are written by someone else as well, you may want to keep that in mind. He uses a teleprompter to deliver them, and God help him when he doesn’t have it. He even recently used it on a campaign stump, so please spare us the critique of Palin if you cannot be honest enough to admit that Obama has serious deficits as well. Let’s sit Obama down with a serious journalist who hasn’t drank the koolaid and ask him some tough questions, here’s a few for you Jake.
1. Why is there no public record of your two years at Columbia?
2. WHO financed your Harvard education
3. Why would you work with Ayers on the Annenberg Project knowing that it was liberal indoctrination of our school children?
4. Where did the rest of the $100,000 go that you acquired for funding of a community garden, and why did you not oversee the project you were acquiring funds for?
5. Why are you accepting money from Jodie Evans who recently met with Ahmadinejad AND Chavez to promote peace and talk about raising funds for a “peace park” in Iran? Jodie Evans is the founder of CODE PINK and a bundler for the Obama Campaign.
6. Why are you misrepresenting your vote on the Born Alive bill?
7. Why 130 Present votes?
8. Why is your brother George living in absolute poverty when you yourself at the Saddleback Forum said WE ARE OUR brother’s keepers and quoted Jesus by saying what you do for the least of these?
9. Can you explain these associations? Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Bernadette Dorhn, Tony Rezko, Emil Jones, Rashid Khalidi, Father Pfleger, Nahhami Auchi, James Meeks, Sam Felson, to name JUST a few, the list could expand enormously.
10. Tell us about your mentor, Frank Marshall Davis? What does he stand for and what about what he believed in did you embrace and believe?
11. Since becoming a United States Senator what bills did you YOU personally draft and introduce, acquire sponsers for, and then pass?
12. Since becoming Senator, how much in earmarks have your acquired and where did they go?
13. Since becoming a United States Senator, how many days have you spent on the floor of the Senate actually working for the American people?
14. WHAT qualifies YOU to be President of the United States?
Those are just a few questions, but believe me the list could be large if there were ANY journalists worth a grain of salt.
The publics right to know went out the window when journalists began presenting their own biases and coddling their own candidate, Barack Obama.
He’ll never get asked those questions.
Posted by: Brenda | September 26, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Grey Matter: Obama did mistakenly say his uncle helped liberate Auschwitz. He later corrected himself. His great-uncle (who he referred to as his uncle, which isn’t uncommon – I have a great-uncle I call uncle myself) was part of the liberation of Buchenwald rather than Auschwitz.
Posted by: Aengil | September 26, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
So Grey Matter are you saying that Obama’s uncle did serve in the Red Army????
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Cult of Personality,
That Auschwitz thing sounds so incredible. That’s why I’m asking you to show me the evidence. Come on, what about Keating 5 then? Or ‘Nam? That was a horrible war.
McCain can’t help much in the meetings because he isn’t on the Senate Banking Committee nor is he a majority leader needed to break ties or something. Those are the facts. I understand if he wants to be there personally to hear the details of the bail out, but I see no reason why he can’t show up for the debate. He has a plane. He can fly there and back.
Right now, he’s the PRESIDENTIAL NOMINEE, not the PRESIDENT. If he were the incumbent, I could understand if he’d say he has to miss the debate. But he’s not. And he has obligations as a candidate to present Americans his policies so they can choose the next person to lead us for four years.
Even if he wanted to bail out of the debate, why didn’t he say anything when the crisis erupted and a bail out looked imminent last week? Why 48 hours before only?
There are American soldiers fighting in iraq and Afghanistan right now. They deserve to know what sorts of foriegn policies will shape their lives in the next four years. THEY don’t get time outs when the going gets tough.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
I would like to see Palin debate Obama tonight. Go Palin.
Posted by: dydx | September 26, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
another Washington insider heard from. How terrified are they of people outside thier little beltway crowd?
Posted by: geevill | September 26, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
In The Dark
You may want to read the entire transcript of Gibson’s so called interview with Palin and her response in WHOLE about seeing Alaska. She was speaking of its proximity to her State and why it was necessary to have working knowledge of that country and its leaders. However, you do know that, its just easier to keep twisting, makes Sarah look bad which suits your purpose. Let’s examine this one
“Iran is JUST a LITTLE country that isn’t a serious threat.”
Now who said that zinger?
Posted by: Brenda | September 26, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Cult of Personality,
Please. What I am trying to tell you is that Obama’s grandfather served in the UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES. His grandmother worked on a Boeing aircraft B-29 assembly line during World War II in Wichita.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Don’t worry, guys.
Anyhow, she is now irrelevant.
American people who has common sense are not that stupid.
We can be fooled for a while but after 3 weeks, we are waking up to see the reality of Palin.
She gave us a nice drama otherwise this campaign would have been boring…. she gave us excitement and panic.
Posted by: zen | September 26, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Grey Matters, that Obama false statement his uncle on Auschwitz is all over the place.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Brenda,
Iran is troublesome, but isn’t a looming threat. We could blast them to smithereens quite easily, and they know it.
His comments were taken out of context. He was saying Iran was SMALL IN COMPARISON to the threat the Soviet Union posed during the Cold War.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
Grey Matter. He lied. Period. He lied. Was his uncle in the Red Army? No.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Obama began his speech yesterday stating:
“On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes – and I see many of them in the audience here today – our sense of patriotism is particularly strong.”
Obama’s canned speeches are poorly covered up. In one speech his line about seeing fallen heroes in the audience was removed from a transcript posted on his website by his official campaign blogger, Sam Graham-Felson.
“On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes, our sense of patriotism is particularly strong,” reads the campaign transcript.
Obama a pathetic empty suit liar.
Where are you Columbia grades Obama?
Uh, Uh, Uh, Uh,
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Sponsoring a bill and drafting a bill are not the same, as you well know. Bills are signed onto by Senators simply because their colleague asks them to, so spare me the “sponsered 1000 bills” analogy. Show me a bill that Obama HIMSELF drafted, pushed through Congress and had adopted into LAW?
Think you can do that without a dose of koolaid?
Posted by: Brenda | September 26, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I looked it up. It’s true, his great- uncle who served in the United States Army. He just got Auschwitz mixed up with Buchenwald.
[[ Madelyn Dunham's brother Charlie Payne was part of the 89th Infantry Division that liberated the Nazi concentration camp of Ohrdruf, a subcamp of Buchenwald.]]
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I’m beginning to feel bad for her. But, it’s not all her fault. Unqualified? Absolutely. Lured by ambition to the highest order? No doubt. But at the end of the day it comes down to judgment. Not hers, but McCain’s. Look, she was a Mayor of a very small town. It takes about 500 people to vote for you to win. Winning in that environment is not about ability to govern. It’s the ability to get your family and friends to the polling stations to vote for you. It’s a high school popularity contest and being elected to a state with 40% FEWER people than Rhode Island, is the same. McCain should have realized this and poor judgment to attract base votes one over qualifications.
Posted by: concerned in Alaska | September 26, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
“I would like to see Palin debate Obama tonight. Go Palin.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 26, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Dear Brenda,
I thought I posted a bill for you.
The Coburn-Obama Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 was signed into law by the President. Another bill Obama pushed through was Lugar–Obama Nonproliferation Legislation which was passed into the law too.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Brenda, excellent questions. I also don’t understand how the media and Dems can tear down Gov. Palin for trivial things when their candidate cannot answer even one of your questions truthfully. What makes them so afraid of asking these questions?
Posted by: Emm | September 26, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Grey Matter
Please. Why is it when it is your candidate his comments were taken out of context? I mean really. When it’s John McCain or Palin, oh GOTCHA, when it’s Obama it’s an excuse. If you were to list all of Obama’s comments taken out of context you’d need a book.
Obama supporters are NOT being honest. They demand honestly from conservatives about Palin or McCain, but they refuse to be honest about Obama. The reason, there’s NOTHING honest about Obama. He came from nowhere, he spouted rhetoric that sounded good, HE and HE alone promoted the elevation of himself to the ONE, and HE alone promotes a sense of ego so large that that alone should scare the American voter, were they NOT drinking the koolaid. There was one other man in history who had that kind of ego. His people loved him too in the beginning.
Obama wants to be president. Its all about Obama, nothing more, nothing less. Had ANY republican candidate said, did, had associations like Obama, they’d be history.
So spare me your excuses and platitudes.
He is the one who is SCARY.
God help us.
Posted by: Brenda | September 26, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
I don’t understand why people keep calling for Biden and Palin to drop out. The decisions were made, deal with it…
Posted by: Jo | September 26, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
I would prefer Palin to Obama. I know Palin has all of Americas interests at heart and I can believe what she says. Palin is the most believable candidate we have had since Truman.
Posted by: dydx | September 26, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
So without Coburn and Lugar, you just have two blank pieces of paper. What bills did HE write, submit and pass? Not which bills did he get added to as an afterthought token?
Posted by: Emm | September 26, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Brenda,
I did make concessions that people did take Palin’s comments out of context over the whole Russia war thing. But what I was more concerned about that the way she phrased it was even then. pretty dangerous and it could be viewed by the Russians as being aggressionist too. Maybe McCain was talking about something else when referring to the “fundamentals” but it doesn’t exactly inspire confidence to people, because many doubt what he meant.
Obama has sponsored bills that have become law. He hasn’t done nothing. And the truth is, we can just blast Iran into pieces anytime, even if Obama weren’t comparing it to the Soviet Union. They don’t even have a system to launch missiles across the ocean to hit us. We don’t need to “bomb bomb bomb Iran” as McCain said. We just need to rein in their president. Few Iranians want to start a nuclear war.
Au contraire, I reckon if Obama’s daughter was pregnant out of wedlock, people would have been jumping about the liberal’s lack of moral values or something too.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
GOP = distraction from the issues, and this thread proves it.
The issue here is Palin’s now proven incompetence. Many Republicans have gone bald or grey watching her being interviewed by Gibson and Couric; she was too embarrassing for words. I couldn’t believe my ears.
But what do the GOP fanboys in this thread do: change the subject, change the subject, change the subject….
Is that the only change the GOP still believes in? Come on, get a grip.
Let’s discuss Palin. My decision to vote Republican will depend on her bowing out, it is simple as that.
I’ve seen ‘all’ her interviews, and I’ve never seen such poor and embarrassing performances from a VP candidate in my 56 years. I feel ashamed for my country when listening to Palin’s comments.
She needs to return to Alaska, after which McCain can try to save his campaign.
And no more distractions, please.
Posted by: GOP = distraction | September 26, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
For your information, he did write and draft those bills. He wasn’t added as an “after thought”. He’s just a freshman Senator, as you said. Why would they have a reason to add his name as a gesture if he weren’t involved in the work for writing those bills?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
To make this clear, I don’t support Palin not just because I think she’s weak on foreign policy and isn’t ready.
I don’t agree with her stands on issues like Roe vs Wade. She has every right to be pro-life, but what right has she to think that she can enforce her pro-life views on everyone? She said she believed Roe vs Wade should be overturned. It’s different from being pro-life to believing that choice should be taken away from all of us.
ANWR? I cannot believe she wants to drill baby drill in such a beautiful place without seeming bothered about the environmental damage. And wanting to get polar bears shoved off the endangered species list when they are already in trouble just so they can open up the polar regions for drilling? Geez, I mean, shouldn’t you as a Christian be mindful of God’s creations too?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
The fact that Palin’s responses to questions are becoming increasingly incoherent rather than rapidly more polished is interesting. Rote memorization should have all but eliminated the overlay of nonsense in her answers by now.
Matt Yglesias offered a decent hypothesis, saying, “It’s possible that all this cramming is causing Palin to become less coherent — instead of just parrying questions she knows she doesn’t have good answers to, she’s trying to remember canned lines but it’s too much all at once to actually get right.”
Posted by: rover | September 26, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Brenda: “Obama wants to be president. Its all about Obama, nothing more, nothing less.”
That reminds me of a quote:
“I didn’t decide to run for president to start a national crusade for the political reforms I believed in or to run a campaign as if it were some grand act of patriotism. In truth, I wanted to be president because it had become my ambition to be president. … In truth, I’d had the ambition for a long time.”
Of course, it wasn’t Obama who said that. It was John McCain.
Posted by: Aengil | September 26, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Whether you look at it from either the Christian side or the atheist side, the outcome is the same. God gave man dominion over the animals to deal with as he saw fit or Nature is running its due cyclic course and trying to stop or slow the extinction of some species is pointless.
Posted by: Emm | September 26, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
I’m “sartorially” conservative (no cape!).
But anyway:
On some of the CBS footage, Palin seems to be looking down at notes (at 2:52 and 3:39 on the above clip, for example). It’s disturbing that if she was actually using notes, she couldn’t perform any better than this.
Palin also seems to have a lot of difficulty speaking in grammatically correct sentences when discussing complex topics. That suggests to me that she lacks experience in thinking and expressing herself in complex, nuanced ways on economics and foreign policy. A disturbing quality for someone who could be President.
Posted by: Danny | September 26, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Grey Matter
Hmm, well let’s see the Coburn/Obama bill, NEW as June 2008, but really, not so new, ORIGINALLY sponsored by Senator John McCain as noted by Coburn himself when the bill was passed. Additionally, I’m sure you understand the practice of “sponsoring,” right? Obama needed to prop up his credentials a little, and how better to do that than with a bill that all Americans would support, no controversy. However, since John McCain is the originator of that particular bill and seen as a co-author, thank you for the reference.
As for the Lugar/Obama nonproliferation bill, it was merely an expansion of US policy already law, had little to no effect on the country with the most nukes, that being Russia, and was so inconsequential it passed on a voice vote.
Got anything else?
Posted by: Brenda | September 26, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
In the same interview Palin said we have a victory in Iraq.
I wonder if she knows who general Petraeus is. If she does, she could have tried to remember that the general has another view.
Posted by: ppppalin | September 26, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Drilling in ANWR is not going to create an ecological disaster there. We have oil wells pumping in downtown Los Angeles. The pipeline has proven to be a boon to caribou as they travel along it and bring their calves to be sheltered there.
In Los Angeles we have billboards in front of oil wells. What do you think they are going to do with the oil? Pump it out on the ground? Would you feel the same about drilling in Wyoming? We do that and Wyoming has survived it.
People are deluded about what actually happens where we drill. Palin knows as she has been there. She is a no nonsense, people first, candidate.
Posted by: dydx | September 26, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
WOW!
This is the person John McCain believes could take over as president in an instant and cope with three wars – in Afghanistan, Iraq and Pakistan – and a potential reprise of the Great Depression?
Unbelievable!
She’s from a Mel Brooks movie!
Posted by: WOW | September 26, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Obama should drop out.
Anyone that willingly spends most of his adult life with anti-Americans cannot have America’s best interest at heart.
Posted by: sally | September 26, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
OMG…
What about Palin on why it’s better to spend $700 billion on financial bailouts than broad-based economic help. The question was simple. The answer came from some dreamscape nobody ever visited:
“That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in. Where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh, it’s got to be about job creation, too. Shoring up our economy, and getting it back on the right track. So health care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade — we have got to see trade as opportunity, not as, uh, competitive, um, scary thing, but one in five jobs created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation.”
Excuse me?
Try to parse that. The bailout helps health reformers by bankrupting the government? We need to accompany our tax reductions with reduced taxes, and pair that with tax relief for Americans? How does the bailout connect to trade, or to job growth? And even the syntax is falling apart: She corrects “help” to “helping,” but “helping” doesn’t make sense in that paragraph.
These aren’t lies she’s telling.
It’s not misdirection, or deception.
It’s just nonsense.
Posted by: kingston | September 26, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Palin has an 83% approval rating in Alaska. That is because she works for all of the people.
Posted by: dydx | September 26, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
So Biden being a hearbeat away from the presidency is a comforting thought?
Biden after 35 years of experience is severely lacking in discipline and judgement.
Palin has the judgement and the discipline and will continue to improve.
Posted by: meddie | September 26, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
The VP job isn’t ON THE JOB TRAINING.
Posted by: Cleo J. | September 26, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
There is a disturbing trend emerging from this race. Women simply can’t stand the thought of other women succeeding and sabotage each other at every opportunity.
Biden can’t even tell us who was the President during the Wall Street crash or that there was no television in 1929.
Palin will be a good VP. For once, we’ll have someone the people like instead of the Washington talking heads who only seem to like each other.
The Beltway including the journalists who cover it have become an exclusive club that resists any attempt to inject an authentic voice into their conversations. It’s about time to close it and open another capital in Phoenix. Better weather and better golf; only slightly worse water.
Posted by: len | September 26, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
In addition to Coburn, Obama, and McCain, there were 43 other Senators who co-sponsored this bill.
Yes, McCain did sponsor it too, but it’s not as though Obama wasn’t involved in the writing or drafting of it too.
I concede Obama, naturally, since he’s had a shorter time in the US Senate, he certainly can’t have sponsored as many bills as McCain. But McCain hasn’t voted since April this year. Obama last voted in July 2008, so I don’t think anyone should be nitpicking on that.
Missed votes by member:
John McCain 64.1%
Votes: 412 votes missed (64.1%), 231 votes cast
Barack Obama 45.9%
Votes: 295 votes missed (45.9%), 348 votes cast
And suddenly McCain wants to rush back to DC? Please.
Obama may have less experience, but I think he has the judgement, and he is more in tune with the finer nuances of foreign policy. He says that we shouldn’t lump the threat of radical Islam all together-that we have to keep in mind that they are made up of different groups, and they can’t all be tackled the same way. And I think America needs a different face after our standing is in the mud after the past eight years- McCain’s impulsiveness and foreign policy take isn’t something I’m comfortable with.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
ABC’s spin: There was a deal before McCain came back to Washington. There was not a deal by the time the evening ended. And now there might not be a bill — or a first presidential debate Friday in Mississippi.
___________________________________
Thank You John McCain for putting the people first and not rushing into this stupid bill without giving it a check over. In my book Obama failed his first test. I would rather have no bill than the wrong bill.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Jake, McCain seems to have lost Huckabee’s support after behaving like a desperate fool this week:
MOBILE, Ala. — Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee said Thursday that Sen. John McCain made a “huge mistake” by even discussing canceling the presidential debate with Sen. Barack Obama.
McCain’s campaign has said the Republican wouldn’t participate in the Mississippi debate Friday unless there was a consensus on the financial crisis, but Obama still wants the debate to go on.
Huckabee defeated McCain in the Alabama GOP primary in February.
Huckabee said Thursday in Mobile that the people need to hear both candidates. He said that’s “far better than heading to Washington” to huddle with senators.
He said the candidates should level with the people about the financial crisis and say the “heart of this is greed.”
Huckabee said he still backs McCain’s candidacy, but said the Arizona senator should not have put his campaign on hold to deal with the financial crisis on Wall Street. He said a president must be prepared to “deal with the unexpected.”
“You can’t just say, ‘World stop for a moment. I’m going to cancel everything,”‘ Huckabee said.
Posted by: herta | September 26, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
OBAMA: Uh, uh, are, uh, uh, uh, um. That’s — that’s a bunch — so — so let me tick these off. Deh… Uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, um, uh. So the issue is not a perception that, uh… Weh, weh, let me put it this way. Uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, We’re — we’re trying to — you know, we’ve got a bipartisan group here and — and — and, uh, uh, uh, uh, um, uh, uh, uh.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Cult of Personality,
The bill wasn’t stalled because of McCain’s “checking” it. The House Republicans disagreed with Bush, then everyone started fighting. McCain has missed the most votes in the Senate-more than even Sen. Tim Johnson who was hospitalised for a brain haemorrhage, but now suddenly he’s so concerned.
There is nothing wrong with his wanting to stay on top of things. But to suggest he is the one alone saving the day isn’t true-it could also inject politics into it and complicate things. And I think he has an obligation as a presidential candidate to the American people to appear at the debate. Can’t he just leave the negotiations for a few hours, then fly back to DC? Why does he have to cancel his appearnace?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I never knew that Alaska was such a hopeless place on earth.
Posted by: kurt | September 26, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
I never said McCain Saved the day but I am glad he was there for me. Your guy Obama said call me if you need me.
I hope that McCain does not show tonight and it is a town hall. The audience will be a good mix of people and i hope Obama gets hammered as he most likely would have even if McCain shows up. Obama hired a faux debater and is ticked off because his study time is interrupted. Mccain does not need to study or a mock opponent.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Ann Coulter was right:
Obama should debate Joe Biden tonight since they can’t seem to agree on issues lately.
I think Palin could debate Obama and still come out looking more sharp and decisive. Obama stutters and rambles on with no clear answer.
He has had 18 months of campaigning and Palin in just one month gives clearer answers. She will improve–BO still the same. Biden has gotten worse.
Posted by: harry | September 26, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Okay, regardless of whether you prefer McCain, think Obama is a lousy debater, whatever, the issue here is I think McCain has an obligation to show up for the debate. It’ll only take around two hours. He can fly back to Washington D.C for the negotiations later. I mean, I’m sure supporters from both sides were looking forward to seeing how their candidate’s policies stack up, right? I myself was looking forward to the debate, not because I was hoping someone could get skewered but so I could hear what McCain too has to say about foreign policy.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Palin is a joke. I can’t believe that she actually cites foreign policy experience because she is “close” to Russia and can see it from an island. I can see the moon, it doesn’t make me an “astrophysicist.”
Posted by: Rick | September 26, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
What is most disturbing is the inability for people to look at the facts about Palin. This is the person that could be a blood clot away from being the POTUS.
Palin is pro life–no matter what even if you are raped or a victim of incest. Palin while Mayor allowed her town to charge victims of rape for rape kits. This is a fact. (McCain oppossed the bill regarding violence against women which would prohibit them being charged for rape kits.) Palin is anti stem cell research. Palin took 6 years and 5 colleges to get BA and in journalism. Palin NEVER had a passport until last year. Palin believes in abstinence only education which I see worked brilliantly and she refused to provide additional funding to day cares in Wassilla.
As to her being “honest”. She said she would cooperate with the investigation in Alaska that started months before she was chosen and by a majority of republican votes. Then she refused to do so. Palin did take the money from the Brdieg to Nowehre. Palin did support the Bridge to Nowhere and then what is the phrase–flip flopped. Palin took the earmarks for the Road to Nowhere and her state has the most per capita earmarks.
These are all facts that you can check out. Plenty of non partisan web sites will give you the facts and tell you when someone lied.
You can refuse to see all these things. But, the bottom line is that I prefer a leader that is educated and more so than me who has a doctorate degree. I am sure she would be fun to go out with and have a beer. But, that is why Bush was chosen last time.
If God forbid, the Palin/McCain ticket wins, I want the first and second in charge not to be like me–but better–smarter, more tempered and yes, more worldy. I want them to be able to put a sentence together that is well thought of and articulate. Why is that asking for so much?
Wake up America. This is not because she is a woman. It is because she is not fit to be VP or god forbid POTUS.
Posted by: Swimlady | September 26, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Well I hope that you get a town hall meeting instead. Obama was asked countless times to do that. I love what McCain did to Obama it was brilliant.
How many times did we hear Obama say he would debate McCain anytime-anywhere? And how many times did Obama decline McCain’s offer to debate?
Obama does not understand that what is agreed upon for this bailout bill is going to be handed to the next president, and I know I would want to have some kind of influence on it or as much as possible. Barack is only concerned with being on T.V. As usual he’s playing the role of a celebrity.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
My observation thus far about conservatives for Palin, is that pretty much – no matter what, they will stay loyal to supporting her. When it is downright reasonable to question her credibility, it is as if you dissed their mother, sister or girlfriend… to the extent that anytime Palin puts her own foot in her mouth, immediately someone else is to blame.
Posted by: Kathy | September 26, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
BREAKING NEWS MCCAIN WILL DEBATE
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Ok, cult of personality–I will bite. What exactly is Mccain doing regarding this bailout and what excatly did he do in the last week with respect to same?
Please enlighten us and possible make us see it your way.
And, yes, why was the Clinton Initiative more important for McCain to attend than to do whatever it is you are going to tell me he did regarding this bailout.
BTW–Obama did nor accept a town hall forum. Obama did NOT refuse to participate in debates.
Will wait for your views–highly interested.
Posted by: swimlady | September 26, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Parker is way out of line. If Biden was a woman, heck, even Obama, the uproar would be torrential.
Posted by: John | September 26, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Her 15 minutes are up. Who else does John have in his bag of tricks?
Posted by: STILTON | September 26, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Cult of Personality,
Where did you hear it? Sorry, I can’t find it on the news or anything. Do you have insider info (I’m not being sarcastic).
Whatever their stands, I strongly believe McCain should show up. I believe choosing the next president of the United States is important too, and the debates are critical to the process.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
OMG!!! DID I NOT HEAR HER COMPARE PUTIN TO A GROUNDHOG (REARS HIS HEAD UP)
ARE YOU KIDDING ME. I THINK KATIE IS BETTER QUALIFIED FOR THE JOB.
Posted by: SHE MI | September 26, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Why is it the Republican talking points on this thread don’t even acknowledge Palin’s performance with Couric.
Complete denial of reality and substituting mindless repetition of something you think is true for any actual dialogue, involving listening and learning. (ie Obama lied about his Uncle’s patriotic service, when he simply mis-named the concentration camp liberated is a good example in this thread)
Change the subject, change the subject change the subjet. And meanwhile look at what has happened to the country.
Posted by: Bullsmith | September 26, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I too, read the interview of Palin with Gibson and it was remarkable for what was left on the cutting room floor. She had better, more concise answers than were heard by the audience. I’ve heard Obama lie and lie and get a pass from the press and don’t getme started on Credit Card Joe Biden. I was aDemocrat but re-registered Independent when my candidate, Clinton,wasforced from the race when she actually could have won thenomination exceptfor the shenanigans of the DNC and their friends, Freddie and Fannie Mac. She now has proposed solutions to the financial meltdown and is being ignored by the press. Give us a leader who is on top of this mess.Obama and his cronies are what got us here.
Posted by: glennmcgahee | September 26, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Why is it the Republican talking points on this thread don’t even acknowledge Palin’s performance with Couric.
_________________________________________
Because if you bothered to scroll you will see that we discussed it a long time ago.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
[[But once the doors closed, the House Republican leader, John A. Boehner of Ohio, surprised many in the room by declaring that his caucus could not support the plan to allow the government to buy distressed mortgage assets from ailing financial companies.
Mr. Boehner pressed an alternative that involved a smaller role for the government, and Mr. McCain, whose support of the deal is critical if fellow Republicans are to sign on, DECLINED TO TAKE A STAND
The talks broke up in angry recriminations, according to accounts provided by a participant and others who were briefed on the session, and were followed by dueling news conferences and interviews rife with partisan finger-pointing.]]
Okay, so I thought otherwise, but now it seems that McCain might after all have had some part to play in the talks falling apart, even if it’s not completely his fault. Now, what’s that about Obama voting “present” when it just means he agrees with a portion of the bill and wants it to be amended.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Obama repeatedly stressed at his news conference that he called McCain first to propose that they issue a joint statement in support of a package to help fix the economy as soon as possible.
He said McCain called back several hours later, as Obama was leaving a rally in Florida, and agreed to the idea of a statement but also said he wanted to postpone the debate and hold joint meetings in Washington.
Obama said he suggested they first issue a joint statement showing bipartisanship.
“When I got back to the hotel, he had gone on television to announce what he was going to do,” Obama aid.
Oh, gosh .. you mean he opted for action vs. “speech” and took the initiative. How disappointing.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Seems as if Palin has even lost the National Review crowd. Kathleen Parker calls on her to resign
Conservatives who continue to support Palin officially lose ANY moral high ground they claim in their opposition to affirmative action.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 26, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Actually, McCain didn’t tell Obama he was skipping the debate. He only suggested suspending the campaign, and Obama said he’d think about it. By the time he got back, McCain had gone on television, not waiting for Obama’s reply. I think he shouldn’t have done that.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
“Oh, gosh .. you mean he opted for action vs. “speech” and took the initiative. How disappointing.”
If by “action” you mean that McCain went on TV … and spoke.
Wow. What a Maverick … [snore]
Posted by: Sen. Dra McQueen | September 26, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Why should McCain give a hoot what Obama does? I admire McCain for taking the lead. I am glad that he was in the talks. Obama also does not want to accountable for anything so of course he did not want to be PRESENT.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Meanwhile Harry Reid, Mr. “We don’t know what to do”, told McCain not to bother coming back, they had the situation well in hand.
Uh huh.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
—
Thank You John McCain for putting the people first and not rushing into this stupid bill without giving it a check over. In my book Obama failed his first test. I would rather have no bill than the wrong bill.
—
Ha ha ha, that’s funny. Obama had not only read it, but interjected his own ideas well before McCain had even READ THE PAULSON report on Tuesday night.
Wow, I’m guessing you’re going to be one of the really disappointed ones when Obama wins 11/4
Posted by: Koronin | September 26, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
It will be great to see the floor wiped up tonight with Obama’s face. Aw, not enough study time Obama?
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
If he favoured a bi-partisan thing, he would’ve waited for Obama’s reply whether he was going withdraw from the debate. What if Obama wanted to do that? McCain goes on TV first so even if Obama was thinking the same, it’d make it look as though Obama followed his “lead” instead of a truly, joint bi-partisan action.
[[Mr. Boehner pressed an alternative that involved a smaller role for the government, and Mr. McCain, whose support of the deal is critical if fellow Republicans are to sign on, DECLINED TO TAKE A STAND ]]
I didn’t think McCain single handedly caused the talks to fall apart, but it seems he didn’t want to take a stand here either.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
—
I thought her interview was less an attempt to learn more about the candidate and more of an “I gotcha” attempt.
—
Well duh! It’s supposed to be a gotcha attempt: This woman says she’s ready to be President and you want ppl to take it easy on her?
Geez, i thought you people were supposed to be tough? Far from it, whine whine whine…
Posted by: Koronin | September 26, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Obama looked like a deer caught in the headlights and very ordinary in this crisis. Obama didn’t care about the bill then and he won’t care tomorrow. He doesn’t want the bankruptcy clause in this bail out bill because it would reflect as a bad vote, bad decision on his part two years ago. It’s all about politics. He’s now carrying on about the U.S. wiping out malaria across the world but God forbid an American gets something.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Simple.
If Palin cannot take “Gotchas” from the news media, how is she going to deal with difficult governments like Iran? Ahmadinejad will do his best to twist and warp all her words to his benefit, and if she cannot fend him off, how is she going to be VP, or even POTUS?
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Alright, conservatives, can we talk?
I realize you’ll continue flaming these boards. That’s OK, flame on. But consider this. The GOP is wrecked, and needs to be rebuilt. Do you really want to do this with McCain and (cringe) Palin? Consider McCain’s weird behavior, wooden leadership style, lack of core message, and advanced age. He is not really a conservative. Consider Palin’s obvious cluelessness.
Let’s say they win. Well, thing’s ain’t getting much better over the next four years. McCain/Palin are a ticket to GOP oblivion.
If I were you, I’d pull up stakes on these losers, keep your powder dry, and work to rebuild the party as true conservatives. Look to people like Bobby Jindal – technocratic, religious, conservative, competent, young, not white.
OK, recommence firing.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 26, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
So isn’t this exactly what Obama has been saying since he appeared on the scene, that there should be change and the change should be made in our national government, reaching across the aisles, sharing and being as bipartisan as possible? When he was asked to be a part of the discussion he was indifferent? He looked like an ant in that room.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
McCain will wipe the floor with Obama which is why he could care less about study time. My prediction is that obama will listen to his answers and pull what he did with Hillary and fashion McCain’s answers into his own. Just like he did at the Columbia forum on Public Service.
Obama is a poor candidate choice by the DNC.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Cultof personality,
Yuo still have not answered my questions–what did Mccain do for the bill? What had he done in the week before it?
And why was the Clinton Initiative more important to attend than going to DC?
Just answer–what did McCain do or is he doing with respect to this bill?
Still waiting…
Posted by: swimlady | September 26, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
We may as well not say whom will wipe the floor with whom since we will find out in about nine hours anyway.
I’m looking forward to it.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
If Gov. Palin were to step down, it would be an inspired Bush-Rovian move ala Harriet Miers: Give them an unacceptable facsimilie of what they (in this case The Right) wanted and then replace her with your real choice. My guess: Mittens. Cancel or postpone the VP debates. Oh this would be just too rich!
Posted by: DrDeedee | September 26, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“If I were you, I’d pull up stakes on these losers, keep your powder dry, and work to rebuild the party as true conservatives.”
Tungsten, as a conservative but not necessarily a Republican I couldn’t agree more. I’ve already braced myself for an Obama victory. I would have preferred Clinton because I believe she would have governed from the center like Bill and that would have been fine with me.
Obama on the other hand really concerns me. He will be left of Carter and will do some serious damage (see Community Reinvestment Act for an example). Whenever I hear a Democrat use the words “fair” and “community” I can feel the money flying out of my wallet and my rights being diminished.
Posted by: Woody | September 26, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Darn, and I though Sarah would be the best media interviewee. I’m so disappointed (not).
The interview came out just as expected. Katie Couric asked her gotcha questions and Sarah, like most Americans, came up short on the question.
Next time, count me in amongst the 60,000 to attend her campaign event. She represents all us “normal” folks who cling-to religion, the Bible, guns, and are bitter with the condescending media.
Posted by: Captain America | September 26, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
I don’t know,
If I had to go for a surgery, I’d like the most qualified doctor, even if I can’t have a beer with him or her.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 26, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
This post by Jake also fails to mention that so called CBS New anchor Katie Couric ordered staff to drop all references to “Governor” or “Gov.” from her interview with Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. When a staff member pointed out that in other venues, Couric and CBS News had referred to Governor Palin’s opponent, Joe Biden, using his title of “Senator” or the abbreviation, Couric, according to a CBS News editorial aide, sought approval from CBS News management to drop the “Governor” reference during her broadcast interview with Palin that began on Wednesday night.
“It’s not true,” said another CBS News source. “We treat everyone the same.”
But, in fact, that’s not the case: as late as September 22, CBS News and Couric — even on the CBS website — used Biden’s honorific.
At no point during the interview does Couric refer to Palin as “Governor.”
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
cultofpersonality.
I did nto want you to google anything–just give me the support for your position as to why McCain going to DC was to “put country first” and unlkie Obama was acting rather thsn speaking.
I am asking you for support for your position as to what is it that McCain did by going to DC and why he had to go to the Clinto Initiative first.
There would be the difference in NOT drinking the Kool Aid and actaully supportying your position.
As of right now, you have not been able to do so. Don’t google, that would be an ad hoc justification for your position. Rather explain to us what McCain did that exemplefies “action” and what he did for this bill on the what was it, “fundamentally sound economy.”
Rather than give us Kool Aid induced sound bites, I am asking for you to support your views.
Please enlighten us……
Posted by: swimlady | September 26, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
swimlady lets make a deal. You get me Obama’s Columbia Grades and I will give you my answer…I am waiting
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
It s clear why they keep her under wraps. She can only utter “beauty queen speak”. Several times she is just incoherent. We hear disjointed fragments of talking points that have been drilled into her, but they are irrelevant to the question asked. She may be the butt of jokes making fun of her ineptitude but her lack of knowledge and skill is alarming and not at all funny. She could become president of the US if the McCain/Palin ticket is elected and he becomes incapacitated for any reason. Even die-hard Republicans must recognize McCain’s lack of judgment in choosing her as a candidate. It is Country Last.
Posted by: jefflz | September 26, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
This says everything you need to know about modern conservatives; Palin is clearly out of her league, but that’s a good thing. It’s a good thing, because the modern GOP doesn’t care about being able, ready, and competent. ALL they care about is party loyalty. that’s it, as long as the candidate is pure with the extreme right wing ideals, then it doesn’t matter if they don’t know anything about law, policy, government, etc.
Just look at who stocked the CPA in Iraq with 22 year old college kids from Liberty University. Doesn’t matter that these kids didn’t know the first thing about rebuilding a country, what mattered is that they were pro life.
Look at the people Bush picked for cabinet positions…Heckofajob, Brownie ring a bell with anyone?
Posted by: Adrian | September 26, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
ATTN Conservatives:
I must confess, I am a Democrat, I have voted the Democrat ticket all my life. But in the interest in putting our country first I will try and be objective and level with you. McCain has displayed for all the world to see that he likes to gamble with hos political future. Now I grant that the conventional wisdom is that it is a bad year to be a Republican. All things considered it would be tough for any Republican Presidential candidate to succeed in this envoirnment. I guess this is why Sen McCain felt that it was neccessary to throw a couple of Hail Mary passes. (Examples: Suspending his campaign, Picking Sarah Palin, saying We are all Georgians, adopting the Karl Rove slash and burn politics rather than being the McCain that ran in 2000). i don’t agree but I can see how most Republicans could find this acceptable. Republicans love their country as much as Democrats do and they have an idea of how to improve tjis country. But if you take an objective view, I think you will find that while this behavior may fly on the campagn trail, it absolutely can not fly in the White House. Imagine what a President whose goal is to ” shake things up” can do in the White House. We can not gamble with our future. Not now. We have a lot of big problems to solve. We are in two wars, our ecomomy is on the edge of falling into a depression, there are 45 million US citizens without healthcare, our Education system and Infrastructure is in tatters, and the confidence of the American people in their governments ability to tackle big problems is at an all time low. And for the last two months John Mccain has shown himself to be reckless, short-sighted and impetuous in his decision making. We literally can not afford this right now.
Furthermore, Sarah Palin is demonstratively unprepared for this job. She has shown no interest in Foreign Policy or Domestic Policy. The prospect of someone so unprepared beingthat close to power sends shivers down my spine. Especially when John McCain has had 4 bouts of Cancer and he is 72 years old.
I ask for Republicans to step back and take a good look at what they are offering for President and Vice President. I implore you to take a second look at what Barack Obama offers. Put your prejudice aside, put your country first, and ask yourself what kind of president do we need right now. Do we need a maverick who’s favorite game is craps, or do we need a steady hand who’s favorite game is poker. I think that when we look at the choice rationally, Barack Obama is the best man for the job right now. That might not have been the case 4 years ago, or 4 years from now. But it is surely the case right now.
Posted by: Waleeg | September 26, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
I’m sorry, but I don’t get the comments about “gotcha’s”. Someone will have to help me out here. Couric asked her pretty benign questions; ones that we all knew were coming: foreign policy, views in Israel, the economy, etc.
I didn’t hear a single off-the-wall question in the interview. Couric was pretty gentle, generally speaking; she even helped Palin out a couple of times when she was flummoxed.
I don’t get it…
Posted by: Christopher Smith | September 26, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I never said anything about Obama’s grades–so how is that quid pro quo? I said it took Sarah Palin 6 years and 5 colleges to get a BA in Journalism and not from a school like Columbia.
Yuo stated that McCain put the country first and he acted. I am asking you how????
Seriously, if you really beleived this, then you would have an answer at the ready to ward of any questions. But, you do not.
I am asking you for support for your position. You asked for Obama’s grades….oh wait, I see what you are doing, clever, changing the topic. It seems to be a theme.
So really the entire board must now be waiting. WHAT DID MCCAIN DO TO PUT COUNTRY FIRST–HOW EXACTLY DID HE ACT IN CONNECTION WITH THIOS BILL AND HOW, DEAR GOD, HOW WAS THE CLINTON INICIATIVE MORE IMPORTANT THAN HIS MAD DASH TO DC?
These are statements you made. I backed my posts and my positions as to why I beleive Palin is unqualified and would nt vote for ANY tiket she was on. Read below.
Now, support your position……and do not change the subject.
Posted by: swimlady | September 26, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
1. I implore you to take a second look at what Barack Obama offers. Put your prejudice aside, put your country first, and ask yourself what kind of president do we need right now.
__________________________________________
1. Nothing
2. Prejudice against what? I am not a racist if that is what you meant. I voted DEM all my life until you stuff this empty suit down our throats. (gag)
3. Not Barack Obama. NEXT!
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
To Waleeg:
“Barack Obama is the best man for the job right now.”
I will vote for Obama if and if you can tell me if he has any:
#1: Foreign policy experience?
#2: executive experience?
#3: legislative accomplishment?
#4: Can he talk without the teleprompter?
#5 What was his toughest vote that he took because if was right for the country and not his party?
Even Obama could not come up with an answer at the 60 minute interview…he said the reason he is ready is because of his “DISPOSITION and knowing how the work with people”
And this is what he said regarding his job:
Based on his own admission yesterday during CNN forum at Columbia University , Obama said this yesterday:
“It’s easy for me to go to Washington and frankly, be somewhat divorced from the day-to-day challenges people have,” he said. Obama, meanwhile, also mocks his own job in response to the same question. “We yak,” he said, while small-town mayors work.”
I rather vote for a DOER than a YAKER
Posted by: frieda | September 26, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
QUID PRO QUO…..
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Sarah Palin reminds me of how the late Sen. Roman Hruska(R-Neb.) once argued that the mediocre in this country deserved to be represented by one of their own. So, mediocre Americans everywhere, your ‘hour’ has arrived. Meet your new leader, Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Kitchen_Cabinet | September 26, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Can you give me his Columbia Grades? you asked me a question. I want something in return before I answer. Quid Pro quo.
Posted by: Cult of Personality | September 26, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
In defense of Palin all I have seen on this blog are routine attacks on Obama. Can anyone honestly stand up and say that Palin is ready to be Vice President? If you are not a trained public speaker and have a poor education does that mean you she is are ready for national office because she is like you? don’t we need the best qualified people to run our country, not our next door neighbors? McCain is making a mockery of this election. His “debate is off now its on” and his choice of Palin are proof positive of McCain’s shoot-from-the-hip lack of judgment.
Posted by: jefflz | September 26, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck. It is up to you to decide whether you want to be on that train, or to have left it at the station. I’m sure you know what rational people would prefer.
Posted by: Robert | September 26, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
I get it. You have an answer that supports your position and of course, supports your candidate.
You just want to keep it a secret until you get Obama’s grades.
Since my education has provided me with knowldge of what quid pro quo really means, I can safely say this is not it.
But, thank you. I printed out your response to my questions to show your support and showed them around. My office is still laughing!
Posted by: swimlady | September 26, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
This has nothing to do with her being conservative or liberal, or with media bias, or with “gotcha” questions (the ost painful of which was the softball question: explain how bieng nex to Russia has given you foreign policy experience) or any partisan issue of any sort. This has to do with an accomplsihed person who nontheless cannot speak in a complete sentence or articualte the basic detailks of her own political positions. Say what you want about Obama’s lack of experience (12 years combined in state legislature and US Senate) but he’s not completely incoherant. It was like watching Britney Spears at last year’s VMA’s – excruciatingly painful to watch someone with talent make an utter fool of herself. Let’s face it, this is not good for the country.
Posted by: Jackie | September 26, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
I am painful to see this interview, she must really feel the pain. Sorry for her!!
Posted by: Spor | September 26, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
What if I own the company?????
Posted by: swimlady | September 26, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
I’m a conservative, and used to be 100% Republican up until 2000.
My views haven’t changed since — but the GOP has. Quite a lot.
I certainly don’t like all-hype-with-little-to-back-it-up Obama or that Clinton clone Biden, but they are less of a disaster than “bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran” McCain (imagine what would happen if the countries were reversed, and it was Ahmadinejad going on stage singing “bomb bomb bomb bomb the US” — does anyone think we wouldn’t have bombed Iran into oblivion for that? So did McCain’s misguided attempt at a joke give Iran a justification to do that to us?) or Palin, who can’t say a coherent sentence if none of the answers from her talking point sheet matches up 100%?
I like Palin’s view on abortion, but I think that’s all there is to like about her – and that’s just not enough.
We (conservatives) need to get our thing together, get back on track and eliminate the Neocon (what is conservative about Bush or McCain? Their interventionism? Or their liberal spending? Or getting more power to the federal govt? I think not.) menace within our rows, until then, the Democrats remain evil, but – as much as it hurts – the lesser evil.
Obama 2008, a real conservative 2012!
Posted by: Formerly GOP | September 26, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
very bad interview, it is too bad for vp or executive, it sounds stinky enough
Posted by: Robert | September 26, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
If you were honest with yourself, you’d admit that she is in over her head. I feel sorry for her and her family. She’s in the Dan Quayle Club now. I’m sure she’s bright and she is very pretty and she’s hard working but she just isn’t ready for prime time. This has got to be hard on her – lay off.
Posted by: spiderbucket | September 26, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I’d feel sorry for her, if she wasn’t such an ugly vindictive petty little person with whacked out hateful views.
Posted by: James | September 26, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
I’m afraid Sarah Palin is not only embarrassing herself, she’s quickly become a national joke.
Usually, candidates for national office get better as time goes on. Palin is clearly getting worse.
The more time Sarah Palin spends on the national stage, the worse she gets.
Embarrasing for US.
Posted by: Robert | September 26, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Granted, she was very disappointing (in fact, painful to watch) to those of us who have been so excited by her selection. However, let’s remember to keep this in perspective. Sarah Palin is an individual who has already shown considerable political talent and lots of smarts in achieving the governorship of her state without any traditional advantages. In fact, she did it by taking on her own party. If that was easy, why doesn’t it happen more often? This is no stab in the dark with an unknown quantity. She has a pretty impressive track record, albeit in a .
Tapes of her performances at the debates in 2006 during the governors race show a woman very much capable of handling questions and thinking on her feet…against a veteran politician, no less. Also, interviews from before her selection as McCain’s running mate show someone articulate and confident, and her campaign appearances since, not to mention her bravura performance at the Republican National Convention, indicate a natural political talent whose charisma shines through the screen. Given all this evidence of her abilities, it is way too soon to toss her under the bus (which would basically kill the McCain campaign anyway, no matter what excuse was offered for her “withdrawal”).
So what’s the problem? Basically, she knows she has big gaps in her knowledge about foreign policy and national issues, and she’s trying to compensate—probably at the insistence of McCain’s campaign handlers—with a kind of prevent defense that relies on bland, all-purpose platitudes. Unfortunately, she sounds very artificial, not to mention simple-minded, doing this over an extended interview.
Hopefully, she’ll get better as she becomes more familiar with the issues and gains more confidence and experience. And let’s face it, she only needs to know McCain’s positions on the major issues, since as running mate her role is to parrot them. VP candidates are not expected to engage in original policy ruminations. In fact, that is a sure way to get into trouble (for more, see Biden, Joe).
These early interviews may be the campaign’s way of giving her some “live ammo” experience before her debate with Biden. Ultimately, if she holds her own there (and these interview performances have lowered the expectations bar about as far down as you can get it), she can spend the rest of the campaign before friendly audiences, jacking up the Republican base, which was the primary purpose for her selection anyway. The national press will undoubtedly howl about her “inaccessibility” but she’ll be able to ignore them.
Posted by: mikeb | September 26, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Many things about Palin have
caught the public imagination.
- telegenic youthful good looks
- mayor, governor
- working mom
- Super Mom
- loves her family
- deep religious faith
- back at work at the
governor’s office three days
after giving birth to her
fifth child along with the
baby
- error of teenage daughter
and other family problems
people can relate to
- frontierswoman
- huntress
- markswoman
- Annie Oakley
- more boy than boys
But Palin lacks the core
requirements the job of
the vice president – and
potentially president -
demands.
- limited range and depth of
knowledge of major national
and global issues and the
ability to articulate them
- does not appear to have
read much, thought much about
our own history and world
history
- does not display independent
thought and polciy ideas in
matters of war and peace, and
relations with foreign
nations
- has not shown the courage
to separate personal beliefs
from public policy on matters
women care deeply about
- does not appear to be
deeply committed to
environmental preservation,
energy independence and
protection of endangered
species
Posted by: anon | September 26, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I know some argue that it is not her job to be John McCain’s historian; that’s true, but if you are going to tout his career, especially those having to do with a heated argument(economy) then you should know more then the 1 bill he proposed ( and it was dead in the water before it started…something about poison pill)
So you know what Sarah, stay in the race, the democrats will thank you
Posted by: make it known | September 26, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Hi Freida,
I think I make my case very clear. Besides that you are attributing a quote to Obama that John McCain actually said ( about being in Washington can keep you away from the day-to-day struggles of average Americans) I don’t want to argue with you about experience, because w/ Sarah Palin the best you can hope for is a tie. My point is that the prospect of these two people running our country should give everyone pause. McCain has the temperment of a person that plays craps. Win big or lose big. and we can not afford that right now. I don’t want to get caught up in the Democratic-Republican anomosity. I just want to ask voters to step back and take a serious look at the pros and cons of our options using the info that each candidate has given us.
Posted by: Waleeg | September 26, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Yes, Palin’s performance in interviews so far has been McPainful to watch. But the common refrain here that McPain made a mistake to select her as his running mate misses the point. It is truly a reflection of his own poor judgment and incompetence: he’s really no better than she is, and why should anyone have expected anything better? He’s just as ill-prepared as she is, but he’s just had more time to gain a degree of comfort in the DC cesspool.
Posted by: Hamm Berger | September 26, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
First, let me say I am a very Liberal Democrat. I am proudly voting for Obama. To my conservative friends (and, yes, I do consider you friends and fellow Americans), please consider a few things…
Regardless of what you think about Obama’s stands on issues, if you are serious and honest with yourself, I think you can agree that he is a well-informed, serious individual. He has spent his entire adult life thinking through issues and discussing them with other top-notch, smart people.
Obama WILL NOT destroy America. In fact, he surrounds himself with very smart people and people who do not necessarily agree with him on the issues.
If you are conservative, you should welcome sane and rational government – regardless of what Obama’s view on abortion or other hot-button topics may be. I think anyone can agree that he is an extraordinary, gifted individual on many fronts…even if you can’t stand him.
I say these things because if you just step back for a moment and logically look at the two choices in front of you, there is only one that makes sense for America. McCain, through his reckless gambits, has confirmed that he does not have the judgment or temperament to lead the nation.
Obama provides conservatives with a sane choice for the next four years while allowing the opportunity to rebuild their party, rethink their positions and reframe the debate. Obama is a supersmart, seriously talented politician. Don’t fear him. In four years, conservatives will be much better off for having him as competition. In fact, the nation will be better off. The Republican party will hopefully offer a serious (and sane) alternative in 2012.
Posted by: john | September 26, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Palin is a smart person who cannot speak Washingtonspeak. Is there a problem? I am inclined to be more impressed by her record in Alaska than by her ability to shmooze with the news bunnies.
Posted by: David H | September 26, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Cult of Personality:
if you would take a deep breath for just a moment and do some research, you’d discover the following:
Senator Obama has in fact spoken with Paulson, consistently and regularly during the financial crisis. He has done so without the publicity. It is his nature as well as his character. Please take a deep breath, research and read more intently. I was not aware of the work he’s done until several REPUBLICANS mentioned their secret respect and admiration for the way he carries himself and handles politics. Many have watched and are looking forward to working with him, even when they disagree on principle.
Posted by: Renee | September 26, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
The scariest thing about Sarah to me is her apparent inability to even CARE that she keeps contradicting herself.
For example (I live in Fairbanks Alaska so have been keeping up on all this), she was quoted as saying of her daughters that
“the girls were told that they were going to be flying to Ohio to celebrate our 20th wedding anniversary” when in fact they were on their way to the announcement of their mother as VP . . .
And then a couple of weeks later she was quoted as saying that “they had a family meeting with the girls before I decided to accept . . .”
BUT she told Charlie Gibson that, when offered the position, she “didn’t even blink . . .”
It’s all too weird. And what kind of person, especially one with family obligations including an infant, would ”not even blink” at this offer . . .
There’s lots more, even a website called
sarahpalinlies.com and all you sarah lovers should go take a look, we are not trashing her, everything is documented and there is something seriously wrong with someone who lies so easily about all kinds of things . . .
Posted by: irina | September 26, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
If she is the most qualified Republican women McCain could find, the GOP is in sad shape. Stop with the pretty, I would rather have smart and informed.
Posted by: veme | September 26, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I am a conservative, evangelical Christian who has voted for the GOP all my life. There is now no doubt to any thinking individual that Sarah Palin (who I initially supported) is completely unqualified, and what this reveals about John McCain, especially his stunts this week.
Me and many in my church will be voting for Barack Obama. With our noses held and with grave reservations – but voting for him nonetheless.
Posted by: faithnabove | September 26, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
That is the problem. She advertised herself as tough and experienced. She was very sarcastic on the convention night…. and these are what the people see now. It’s very embarrassing. It’s very sad. I wonder how she handles it. People might vote for her because of symphaty and that is not good for the nation. I like her but she is just not ready at this time. Our nation and our pride is at stake. This time it’s nation first before party.
Posted by: REPUBLICAN | September 26, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
I am a conservative, evangelical Christian who has voted for the GOP all my life. There is now no doubt to any thinking individual that Sarah Palin (who I initially supported) is completely unqualified, and what this reveals about John McCain, especially his stunts this week.
Me and many in my church will be voting for Barack Obama. With our noses held and with grave reservations – but voting for him nonetheless.
You guys are the true patriots. Nation first.
Posted by: SP | September 26, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
My heart goes to Sarah. She is not ready. It’s Mccain fault and his political agenda. Why subject her to all this torture. She is a nice hockey mom.
Posted by: REP | September 26, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
I am a Dem, and I would normally have gloated over this, but I kinda feel sorry for the woman. It is a little surprising to see this, as most politicians at this level (and she is a Governor) can articulate their talking points pretty well. Even Bush, when prepared does fine!! I believe Kay Bailey Hutchison would have been a formidable woman choice but, hey, she does not shoot moose!!!
Posted by: Jay Nag | September 26, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Who is better to judge Palin than fellow conservative woman like Parker. Well, now we know that Palin is clueless, and McCain is putting this nation before personal ambition to be the President than he claims “Country First.” McCain selection of Palin is a an insult to intelligent women in this country and insult that everyone that has a brain.
Get ready for WW III if McCain is elected because he is reckless and the world might come to end with his clueless VP.
Posted by: undecidedvoter | September 26, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
palin i suspect was chosen to woo the evangelican vote. her level of sophistication on the world level to be quite frank is embarrassing. all presidents in my view have puppetmasters. sadly she is so lacking, that if she ever became president every waking thought would be controlled. that’s disconcerting because i have not heard an original thought from her yet. she seems to respond to questions with talking points, and when that isn’t possible you get, what reminds me of a kid trying to outsmart you, when you’ve been there, done that.
Posted by: kenneth | September 26, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
I applaud Kathleen Parker for speaking what a lot of us women who earned our seat at the “good ‘ole boys” table by being roasted, toasted, and able to stand the heat; Sarah Palin is NOT qualified to be VP. She should bow out with respect and dignity.
Posted by: adelle | September 26, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
I guess I’m the only one that loves Sarah Palin, but that’s fine by me.
Every time I hear her asked a question, I guess I get distracted, because I awlays wonder what the Democrat running for President — Barack Obama — would be able to give as an answer.
What IS Barack Obama’s foreign policy experience? Is he running for PRESIDENT, or is that my imagination?
Also, since I’m an independent, not a conservative, what conservatives think about Palin is irrelevant. If what conservatives think is suddenly relevant to liberals, so be it… but LOL!
Sarah Palin doesn’t have to please the msm or conservatives to please me.
What I like about her is, she took on Frank Murkowski, as a reformer, and she won. And she reformed. And that’s what DC needs.
What DC doesn’t need is another Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid — meaning Barack Obama and Joe Who — at the helm.
Posted by: Jan | September 26, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Leave Sarah alone. She has more executive experience than Obama, and if the media spent as much time airing and writing about the many gaffes that Obama and Biden have said, than they should be declared as unqualified and are an embarrassment to the Democrat party.
Posted by: Karen | September 26, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
I think the unfortunate Palin experiment by Team McCain leaves Team Obama the perfect opening to welcome Kansas Governor Kathleen Sebelius onto the Democratic ticket instead of Senator Clinton.
Before Palin’s frightning display of vapidity and Clinton’s extremely disloyal scheming and passive aggression, Sebelius would have seemed a drastic gamble.
Today, Sebelius would appear a welcome relief from the other two women and John McCain as well. She is Hillary Clinton, but without Bill and other baggage. She is Sarah Palin, but without the cold vast spaces echoing throughout her interviews. She is John McCain, but healthy and sane.
Sebelius has been loyal to Senator Barack Obama. She has a calm, reasonable personality as opposed to vengeful or spiteful. Her silver hair and quiet demeanor lend gravitas to Obama’s youth and vigor. She works well with political opponents. She has held elective office for many years, including at the executive level in a red state, no less. She doesn’t hide from the media or political challenges.
Sebelius would easily neutralize Palin by reveal Palin as a loud-mouth little girl without no danger of the repeated sexism whining and crying. At the same time, she could win over the remaining Hillary Clinton demographic who have not already joined Team Obama.
OBAMA/SEBELIUS 2008!!!
Posted by: Donna | September 26, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Sarah Palin is the perfect symbol of the current state of the United States of America.
Posted by: benalbanach | September 27, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
This woman didn’t know what the Bush Doctrine is.
…even W knows what the Bush Doctrine is.
Posted by: Maggie | September 27, 2008, 4:09 am 4:09 am
Maggie: Who cares what the Bush Doctrine is. We care about the issues. I have voted many times over and I had never heard of it myself and it isn’t that important. What’s important is the economy and the bail out. Get a life. Couric and Parker are very jealous of Palin and they didn’t go further in their life than she did and neither did a lot of young woman. She is very aggressive and that’s why she was a mayor then a governor. If you think you can do better than that get busy and get into politics.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 27, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
Donna: The only reason Kathleen has been warming up to Obama she though she would be chosen for the VP spot but got fooled. She doesn’t even qualify for the VP. Hillary or Biden are his best choice and he made that choice. I believe he should have chosen Hillary but only he knows why he didn’t. Hillary and Bill should not be campaigning for him because he doesn’t need them. He used them for his own benefit. Bill Clinton doesn’t really like Obama and it shows by his actions. That’s why he praised McCain and Palin.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 27, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Jay B. Long: If your not satisfied with your party vote democrat and call it a day. And McCain’s age at 72 doesn’t matter. Joe Biden is 65 years of age. Who cares as long as they can do the job. Be lucky if you live to be that age. And I am sure your parent’s are not young.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | September 27, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
The great thing about the news cycle is that it’s as ADD as the rest of America. If she can do well in the VP debate the Couric interview will be soon forgotten. On the other hand, if she bombs, the campaign goes to Obama because even Republicans don’t want an idiot in the Naval Observatory.
Posted by: bfree007 | September 27, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
I don’t think this is a take home interview, Sarah.
Nice person, just not too bright.
Posted by: Angela | September 27, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
The elitist wing of the conservative movement have always been wary of us libertarians coming into the GOP. Sarah Palin is one of the top elected libertarian Republicans in the country, (along with Idaho’s Gov. Butch Otter, and Cong. Jeff Flake of AZ).
Of course, she’s going to make some conservatives nervous.
They are wary of her libertarian cultural views. This is the woman who famously fought back against social conservatives in Wasilla who wanted to run all of the bars and taverns out of town.
But what she loses from the social conservatives, she gains 10 times over in libertarian votes.
Figure, Libertarian Bob Barr was polling 6% nationwide in mid-summer, and post-Palin he’s now down to 1%.
With Sarah Palin, the libertarian wing of the GOP has finally arrived. Of course, that’s going to make some other Republicans nervous.
Posted by: Eric Dondero | September 28, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am
Kathleen Parker, a so called “conservative columnist” is either “missing a few tacos from her platter” or is a Mole for the Democrats.
With less that 40 days to go until the general election, she made an incredible statement attacking John McCain’s Presidential running mate, Sarah Palin. She stated that Palin is a “dud” and should “step aside”.
Surely, a True Republican would never say such a thing, and certainly not at this stage as it would mean a a certain loss to McCain if that were to happen. So why did she say it?
A few more Kathleen Parker gems below:
“I love Obama for his style, grace, intellect and his way with words. I want the healing power that an Obama presidency could deliver to this country”.
“Alaska someday will be home to Christian renegades arriving for the Rapture”.
This is also the same Kathleen Parker that agreed with Ahmadinejad’s assertion that women should not be in the British military (or any military for that matter) after Iran commandeered a British ship with a woman sailor on board.
Parker went on to “diss” the woman in the military and say it was not their roles to be serving their country in uniform and should instead stay home and raise their kids.
Perhaps she sould tell that to Sgt. Leigh Ann Hester who won a Silver Star in Iraq after a fierce 90 minute firefight in which she saved many lives with her bravery in direct combat with the enemy.
Or perhaps she should tell that Army Spc. Monica Lin Brown who was also awarded a Silver Star for bravery under fire and also saving many lives.
Should we now ground Colonel Martha McSally, the first woman to fly combat in the United States Air Force? Not only is Colonel McSally a decorated combat pilot (A-10 Thunderbolt II), she also is the first woman to successfully command an American fighter squadron-the 354th Fighter Squadron.
Oh wait..let’s not forget that Parker strongly believes that Sarah Palin needs to spend more time with the family..along with our women in the military.
No, Kathleen Parker is not missing a “few tacos” at all. It is my view that she knew Exactly what she was saying and why she said it. Furthermore, it is my view that she is either a secret Mole for the Democrats or at the very least, has become a useful idiot for them. Truly pathetic.
Posted by: Al MacLeod | September 28, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Why would McCain do this to Sarah Palin? It’s quite cruel… Why would McCain choose this for the country? It’s beyond self-centered…
Posted by: collette | September 28, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
Parker is just one of those women that can’t stand when a woman passes her on the ladder of success! She deserves to be where Palin is. She has been throwing out little bones about running for office herself for years now. I don’t think Palin is out of her depth. Parker is just another elitist woman who likes to think of themselves as better than the rest of us ‘normal” women. These diva-ish women like Parker and that perky blonde chick on the nbc morning show that lost her husband are the same way, other women just are not as smart as couric and parker and they must let us know or we might find out the hard way how stupid we are. We might even do something that would embarass them like voting republican no matter what Parker and her little friends vote. What would happen if they showed some respect. I know, their little faces would crack! Ick, Horrors, respecting other WOMEN! Parker might consider dragging herself out of the “trash all women but me” line before the heat gets turned all the way up.
Posted by: desiree | September 29, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm