Sep 29, 2008 3:02pm
In My Inbox Just Minutes After the Bailout Bill Went Down
"What Senator McCain was able to do was to help bring all of the parties to the table, including the House Republicans, whose votes were needed to pass this"
–McCain campaign manager Steve Schmidt, Meet the Press yesterday.
More than two-thirds of the House Republicans, as you likely know, voted against the bill, which went down, 205-228.
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
We need to wipe the slate clean… It was a Republican President that screwed things up and him and all of his ilk must go!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 29, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
….and its the Republican’s fault the bill didnt pass?!?!?
Posted by: JM | September 29, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
*snicker*
Posted by: dave | September 29, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
So much for McCain having any clout or credibility.
Posted by: bhciapol | September 29, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Obama / Biden 2008
Peace
Posted by: jen | September 29, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
McShame!
Posted by: Erik | September 29, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
OK, How many Democrats voted against the bail out? YOU DIDN’T mention that in your comment. Doesn’t the democrats control the Congress? So what is the deal here, tell the democrats to shore up their own party to pass this bill, before throwing rocks in a Glass house.
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
McCain is just looking more and more PATHETIC.
He can’t even influence his own party now. Glad he suspended his campaign. He should make it permanent!
Posted by: Lower the bar a little more | September 29, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Republican constituents don’t like this bill. Irresponsible people took out loans they couldn’t afford, the Democrats forced the banks to make the loans (just look it up), and Wall Street greed added fuel to the fire. Responsible taxpayers are expected to pony up $700 billion and why — so that banks will continue to make loans and America’s credit train can keep rollin’ on. Enough! Let the market work as it will and the chips fall where they may.
Posted by: marylou | September 29, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
No corporate welfare. Let Wall Street rescue itself.
Posted by: R.I.P. Wall Street | September 29, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
a dem. congrats to the 94 dems who voted no to this bailout. noone bails the middle class out and wall street sows what it reaps. thats free enterprise.
Posted by: ron | September 29, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
It was Democrats Barney Franks and Chris Dodd who defeated a McCain sponsored bill in 2003 to address the outrageous irresponsibility in the mortgage market. Barney Franks and Chris Dodd have been paid huge bucks from mortgage companies. When is someone going to investigate them?
Posted by: Pam | September 29, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Good Lord! McCain needs to suspend his campaign, cancel the VP debate, and get back to his office and back on the phone in DC, stat!
Posted by: sp | September 29, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
I think the point here is not that a pile of Democrats also voted against the bill, but that McCain was taking credit for getting House Republicans to vote for the bill to get it passed when, in fact, House Republicans did not vote for it in great enough numbers and it failed. Do you see Obama sending emails saying, “Look at me, I got the Democrats to pass the bill?”
That’s the issue. It’s not that people voted for or against it, it’s that McCain is saying he helped get it passed when it actually failed. Smooth move, NOT.
Posted by: Bri | September 29, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
McCain tried so hard to take credit and now Schmidt just made a fool of him…
What a joke…
Posted by: l | September 29, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
The point was McCAIN’s campaign is BRAGGING about how McCAIN brought “everyone to the table”.
They obviously didn’t listen to him though.
Posted by: The Point | September 29, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
NINETY FOUR DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT!! 94 Bill so bad a big MUD SANDWICH even the DEMS can not Stomach IT!!!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | September 29, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Neo-Conservative economics has failed. It has failed in monumental, historic proportions.
And now, because Republicans have too much pride to admit to the failure of their fiscal ideology, we all have to continue to face a crisis. This is a Republican meltdown that is about to hit us all, in our homes and in our pocketbooks, like a tsunami.
The Republicans are putting country last.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | September 29, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
marylou: Where–EXACTLY–would we look up the “fact” that the Democrats forced banks to make bad loans?
Posted by: Joel | September 29, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
It is the John McCain crew that voted for de-regualtion which caused all this crap…and you want them again
Posted by: formerhillary | September 29, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
How can Republicans face down Osama Bin Laden if they can’t take a partisan speech by the speaker of the house? Simple answer: They can’t. What a bunch of babies. “Nancy hurt my feelings! I’m going to cry to my mommy and take nap now. I want my banky!”
Posted by: AppeaseThis | September 29, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
140 Democrats voted for it; 65 Republicians voted for it. To make it bi-partisan the Republicans needed to supply half the votes. REMEMBER THIS IS A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION. The democrats don’t want to go off on a limb to assist Bush without equal support from the Republicans. This is how politics works. Sad, but true.
Posted by: Michelle | September 29, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Deregulation was by far a republican mantra albeit some democrats wanted it too. Because Democrats did not fight back hard enough to change that mantra, both parties are complicit to this mess. Both parties negotiated and came up with the bad bill and it took both parties to bring it down. Thus both houses and both parties should share the blame equally for trying to pull the wool over the taxpayers eyes once again. Our government has been hijacked (both parties) by the constant prostituting of our elected officials by lobbyists. Down with lobbyists!
Posted by: eyeonyou | September 29, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Oh, you must have lost the Obama note which stated that McCain deserved no credit for the bailout bill.
Oh, that was stated by The Messiah during his Face The Nation pontification.
He, of course, patted his holy back while he stated it.
Posted by: Captain America | September 29, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
If anyone is dumb enough to think that George Bush is solely responsible for this current crisis, they don’t deserve the right to vote. If Obama, from his high horse, says one more time – ‘we shouldn’t be here to begin with’, he should lose the election on that alone. Finger-pointing makes him look like 5 year old, not the next leader of the Free World. Yesterday is past – the crisis is now, and we need the smart people in this country to propse multiple plans to get things back on track. Isn’t it possible that McCain and the rest of the nay-saying Democrats and Republicans actually believe this IS a bad thing and we need a different/modified approach?
Posted by: Lourie | September 29, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
WOOHOOO THE BIGGER THEY ARE THE HARDER THET FALL!
Pelosi just is a failed leader, can’t deliver. Fire all their sorry butts!!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | September 29, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Well, since some say this began b/cause of a bill under Clinton’s watch (w/ a repub congress), then this mess can be laid at the feet of the Repub administration. The buck stopped there.
Posted by: Henri | September 29, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
House GOP cries like little girls, Waaaaaa! Pelosi said mean things about us, Waaaaaaaa!
And they kill the bill just because of that. Not for what was in the bill, nooooo, they throw a little temper tantrum like the children they are. Waaaaaa!
Way to go, republicans. you guys really do want to lose all your political power for the next 20 years, don’t you?
Posted by: Hugh | September 29, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
So, Nancy Pelosi failed to show leadership in getting all of the Democrats to vote “yes”…..
No word on ABC. To be expected from a “news” site that is paid to place Obama campaign ads on it’s web site.
Day 27: How much is ABC paid by the Obama campaign to host web ads and how is that not a conflict?
Posted by: Tina | September 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
How on earth did the democrats lead by the senile crackpot from San Francisco go scott free.She and the slimy democrats are equally to blame.ABC should soon rename itself MSNABC.Better to merge with the thrill up the leg network.Democrats want to make political capital out of a crisis and will FAIL MISEARBLY AND COMPLETELY.
Posted by: JOL | September 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
listening to the conference on bloomberg radio. The repubs blew the plan up based on idealogy. One quoted”if we vote for this socalism won’t end”
Other repubs feelings were hurt by Pelosi’s comments and voted No.
These clowns don’t understand the entire economy is impacted here not just Wall St.
Once again the right wing extremists have messed up the country.
Posted by: marlene | September 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
THEY SHOULD POST THIS ON EVERY NEWS SITE IN AMERICA!
Posted by: Bet Fox Won't Mention This | September 29, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
This will just kill McCain on leadership, the economy, etc. Voters just see a political opportunist who used a crisis to make himself look good. And then he doesn’t even deliver in the end with his own party.
Posted by: matt | September 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
PRESIDENT BUSH MUST FIRE THE CHAIRMAN
OF SEC-CHRIS COX AND HIS ASSOCIATES…
AMERICANS NO LONGER TRUST OUR
POLITICIANS …….
Posted by: ROBERT | September 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Nancy Pelosi failed to get enough Democrat votes to pass the “Obama ACORN Money Grab Act of 2008″.
What a weak “leader” she is.
The Democrat party has more than enough votes to pass the Obama ACORN Bailout, but Pelosi couldn’t get enough of them to vote for it.
Posted by: OxyCon | September 29, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
Do you hear that noise? It’s the final nail in McCain’s campaign.
Posted by: Rick | September 29, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Obama said McCain deserved no credit for the bailout bill….
Once again, HE WAS RIGHT!
Posted by: Truth Hurts the GOP! | September 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
lol mccain what a winner!!!!
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
McCain now has an excllent reason to suspend the campaign once again and cancel the VP debate.
Posted by: VP | September 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Can we please get rid of Nancy Pelosi, she is such a screw up. And while we are at it, lets go after all the senators and representatives that have had their hand in the cookie jar at Fannie and Freddie, Dodd, Obama, Frank,etc. We the American people have had enough of their antics. There is nothing Barak Obama can say now to get himself far enough away from this mess.
Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Perhaps it’s just a ploy so McCain can “suspend” his campaign again and Palin won’t have to debate Thursday.
Now that would be the first thing McCain did that makes sense.
Posted by: Laura G. | September 29, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Some Repubs voted no to spite Pelosi. Absolutely unbelievable. These people should immediately be recalled from office. NO POLITICIAN SHOULD EVER PUT THEIR PRIDE BEFORE THE NEEDS OF THE COUNTRY. How dare they!
Posted by: DogBitez | September 29, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
the democrats are the majority they have 194 votes. 90+ dems voted against it.
thanks to john mccains presence on the hill otherwise the 3 page original bill would be law today. with no provisions.
pelosi get over the hurt and guilt trip and get back to work. and this time try a little diplomacy instead of partisan hysteria.
gotta go to work, bye folks.
Posted by: colorado | September 29, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
How long must we put up with Nancy Pelosi and Barney Frank? These two along with many other corrupt officials including Dodd and Obama, need to step down.
Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Before McCain came back to DC the repubs had 4 votes for the passage of this bill, McCain rounded up 63 more votes. I would say that isn’t a failure. Perhaps Obama should have gotten involved and gotten 13 more votes then it would have passed. But alas O was too busy kissing babies and making nasty comments.
Posted by: samhiguchi | September 29, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Boehner Revisited.
Was this a Freudian slip…
“I’m encouraging every member of our conference – if their conscience will allow them to — to support this bill,” said House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, just now.
Holy cow the Republicanss are certainly all about distancing themselves from this Administration.
Posted by: i am so I can!!!! | September 29, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
THIS mess started with the DEREGULATION ACT in the Carter administration that everyone without income or credit should be allowed to own a home, and then the government run Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were to insure these lousy loans! The Republicans tried to regulate this crisis in 2005 and the Democrats blocked the bill! Use to be to buy a home you needed three things: ten percent down, a stable work history, and a stable credit history and not spending more of your income than what you bring in! SOMEHOW this changed with this “housing act” and then you had people who could not afford to rent getting into mortgages with ARM’s…..NOW we are to bail out the investors who made these bad loans? AND Pelosi wants it to have all these federal earmarks for MORE unnecessary funding of risky mortgages? SHE is an IDIOT!
Posted by: HP Boston | September 29, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Some of the republicans on the board are missing the point of the article. The article is not placing blame on which party did or did not cause the bill not to pass, but pointed out that McCain’s camp was trying to make it look like McCain helped get agreement to pass the bill before the vote was conducted. They were trying to make it look like he was being a leader by getting back to DC and talking the Republicans into supporting the bill. They jumped the gun and now they look dumber than releasing an ad saying McCain won the debate before the debates even occurred on Friday. I wonder if they are already asking editors of newspapers to start printing papers that say McCain won like Dewey did.
It seeme like everytime the McCain camp tries a ploy to make McCain look like he is a maverick or a leader it backfires lately.
Posted by: Mack | September 29, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
There are no Good Options.
Pass the bailout – Risk Taxpayers Money
Don’t Pass bailout – Lose your Jobs.
We know the problem:
Deregulation -> Subprime Mortages -> Foreclosures -> Unpaid Loans -> Insurance Bankrupts -> Banks Bankrupt
We Know or options:
Bailout -> Keep Industry rolling -> Out of control inflation -> Bankrupt Taxpayers
No Bailout -> Industry Fails -> Jobs Loses -> Depression
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Democrats attempted to come through for Bush. They voted IN FAVOR in larger numbers than Republicans who voted NAY. It’s utterly absurd for the GOP whiners to blame Pelosi when Republicans failed to support the Bush Wall Street bailout.
Posted by: Mary Santos | September 29, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
republicans/democrats killed the bill because we called them and demanded their heads if they did not provide provisions that protect us the tax payer. they responded thank you.
Posted by: colorado | September 29, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Time for a clean sweep of both houses. You can keep Kucinich and Ron Paul but just about everyone else needs to go! Bush and cabal need to go to and fast!
Posted by: eyeonyou | September 29, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
It’s easy to say let the chips fall where they may until you can’t get a loan or your 401-K loses half it’s value.No one likes the concept of a bailout but sometimes it’s necessary to overcome ideology and put the country first.Unfortunately, the conservative Republican house members are too worried about reelection and not worried enough about their country.
Posted by: bill | September 29, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
But obviously Pelosi could not get some DEMS to vote either since they are the MAJORITY.
Jake Tapper: Fair and Unbalanced (snicker)
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I know of no one who is willing to vote for Barak Obama after everything that came out about his involvement in this financial crisis. No wonder he wanted to stay away from Washington and put the emphasis on the debate. He’ll not walk away from this scandal unscathed. The American people are on to him big time. McCain will clean house in Washington. Our government has gotten way too big, and would get only bigger under Obama. He even said that he “suspended his earmark spending” when he was called on it by McCain in the debate, which means that he would only start it back up again as soon as possible. Millions of the taxpayers money for his earmarks. Did you see the look on Obama’s face when John McCain said we should curtail all spending in Washington. Obama looked like a shopaholic that just lost her credit card. We can not afford a Tax and Spend liberal at a time like this. And he has the most liberal voting record of anyone in the Senate. We the people will not stand for it.
Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Republicans want deregulation but don’t want to pay the POLITICAL PRICE of it. Deregulation cause the Wall street recession , now they don’t want the bailout because of ideology. Either way America loses. Intervention is the only option that could prevent a depression. Obama and the Dems are right on this one. They rather lose an election then let the control go into a Depression.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
“More than two-thirds of the House Republicans, as you likely know, voted against the bill, which went down, 205-228.”
Yes we know Jake because FOX news reported it first.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Americans are such fools. You will now find out WHAT this means. To the people who voted for Bush. You deserve the loss of jobs, the plummeting equity in your homes, the loss of prestige that we face internationally, the danger we now face cause we are now percieved as “in turmoil” and an easy target. But the rest of us. We do not deserve any of this. The majority of Americans didn’t have the brains to vote for the right man last election. Why should we have to listen to their opinions about economics they know nothing about. Yes, your president let greed ruin our lives. Now it’s your turn to clean it up. Sorry you don’t like it.
Posted by: leenielamb | September 29, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
same team
same bologne
throw these bums out
Posted by: dl | September 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Republicans First
Wall Street Second
Taxpayers Last
Posted by: BBMJ32 | September 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
McCain’s statesmanship got the bill this far and without the shameful ACORN payoff the Dems tried to sneak in. Pelosi’s “Democrats first” agenda sank it.
Posted by: Pam | September 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I am reminded of the impact of the “government shutdown” by the republicans…..I will never be able to vote republican again. I am so disappointed in the partisan ignorance fanned by anti intellect!!!
Posted by: mary S | September 29, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
samhiguchi,
Who says McCain should even take credit for the 59 vote increase in the Republicans for the bill? You make it sound like the republicans are a bunch of sheep who will do anything McCain asks for. There were changes and compromises in the bill made in the close door (meaning McCain was not involved) meetings of the committee that may have swayed a number of the republicans and democrats one way or another. Also, to assume that just because Obama was not in DC that he was not talking to people to try to get a bill that would pass is naive. How can you say he was not on the phone when not on the stage or conducting email business with people in Congress.
The point of this article is that McCain’s campaign took credit for something that did not happen. He was not able to get enough Republican support for the bill in order for it to pass, which is what he said he would work to do.
Posted by: Mack | September 29, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Colorado…..I’m with you, that they heard the American people loud and clear, that they did not want this bill passed. I heard on one news channel that the emails from the American people were 1000 to 1 against the bill.
Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
I ;hope McCain heads back to Washington and KNOCKS HEADS. He needs to impress upon the House Reps that they need to be bigger than the partisanship that the Dems are showing– Pelosi is NOT helping matters with her remarks BEFORE the vote. Yes, the Republicans did not deliver 50% but the Democrats only delivered 60% of their members as well. Neither side should be proud of what has happened. And Schmidt did jump the gun, but his basic point that McCain helped bring more republicans into the fold is correct. Hopefully, McCain can now convince more of them to come along. This is one time that his ability to work across the aisle will not help, because no democrats will be allowed by their leadership to work with him this close to a crucial election. And its a damn shame.
Posted by: moderate | September 29, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Joel,
An article by the Investor’s Business Daily (posted Sept 15, 2008) explains it very well. Google it! Here is an excerpt.
“But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street’s most revered institutions.
“Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.”
Posted by: James Danley | September 29, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
i can’t believe some of you are actually demanding that they hurry up and rob us.
the day that obama supporters fanatically demand that a plan proposed by george bush must pass now will go down in history.
other ideas, and proposals will now come forth that will provide us more protection.
90+ democrats voted against it this was a bi-partisan defeat. the democrats did not have their own party on board.
Posted by: colorado | September 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
There was no housing bubble until Bush came into office. Stop lying and stop blaming everyone for the GOP destroying our economy in 8 years.
From Super power to the poor house.
Great job GOP.
Posted by: langs | September 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
tina: “So, Nancy Pelosi failed to show leadership in getting all of the Democrats to vote “yes”…..”
Typical Republican. You seem to think everyone belives it’s all a game, all about scoring a point. I can’t believe you honestly think it is BAD THAT DEMOCRATS WANT MORE THAN A BARE MAJORITY ON THIS.
This is nasty medicine, it is admirable that Democrats are willing to keep re-working it until they satisfy the representatives of as many Americans as possible.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Mack: Thanks for reminding posters of the whole point of this item: Just as McCain declared victory in Friday’s debate before it ever occurred, he’s claiming credit for bringing parties to the table to pass the bailout before it passed.
Posted by: Alex | September 29, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
This is the 1st time in my life I am truly scared. The bailout isn’t perfect but it attempts to stop a depression. There is no stopping the recession. America can recover from a recession, not a depression. Republicans are playing politics with America’s future. They want go against ideology to prevent a crisis. That is the real problem. They caused it and don’t want to pay the POLITICAL PRICE.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Barney frank said it best
as some of the brainless continue to try and blame it on being offended by a speech and that is what republicans voted on…
be very clear if republicans voted because they were offended by a speech as the country burns
America very clearly will say to them
“Get the f@#$ OUT!”
same team
same bull
throw the bums out!
send Boehner and his tanorama maxchine back to the golf game he enjoys with al of those deregulation lobbyists.
disgusting what the republicans have pulled during this election.
period.
Posted by: dl | September 29, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
H R 3997 RECORDED VOTE 29-Sep-2008 2:07 PM
QUESTION: On Concurring in Senate Amendment With An Amendment
BILL TITLE: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide earnings assistance and tax relief to members of the uniformed services, volunteer firefighters, and Peace Corps volunteers, and for other purposes
Ayes
Noes
PRES
NV
Democratic
140
95
Republican
65
133
1
Independent
TOTALS
205
228
1
—- AYES 205 —
Ackerman
Allen
Andrews
Arcuri
Bachus
Baird
Baldwin
Bean
Berman
Berry
Bishop (GA)
Bishop (NY)
Blunt
Boehner
Bonner
Bono Mack
Boozman
Boren
Boswell
Boucher
Boyd (FL)
Brady (PA)
Brady (TX)
Brown (SC)
Brown, Corrine
Calvert
Camp (MI)
Campbell (CA)
Cannon
Cantor
Capps
Capuano
Cardoza
Carnahan
Castle
Clarke
Clyburn
Cohen
Cole (OK)
Cooper
Costa
Cramer
Crenshaw
Crowley
Cubin
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (IL)
Davis, Tom
DeGette
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Donnelly
Doyle
Dreier
Edwards (TX)
Ehlers
Ellison
Ellsworth
Emanuel
Emerson
Engel
Eshoo
Etheridge
Everett
Farr
Fattah
Ferguson
Fossella
Foster
Frank (MA)
Gilchrest
Gonzalez
Gordon
Granger
Gutierrez
Hall (NY)
Hare
Harman
Hastings (FL)
Herger
Higgins
Hinojosa
Hobson
Holt
Honda
Hooley
Hoyer
Inglis (SC)
Israel
Johnson, E. B.
Kanjorski
Kennedy
Kildee
Kind
King (NY)
Kirk
Klein (FL)
Kline (MN)
LaHood
Langevin
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
Levin
Lewis (CA)
Lewis (KY)
Loebsack
Lofgren, Zoe
Lowey
Lungren, Daniel E.
Mahoney (FL)
Maloney (NY)
Markey
Marshall
Matsui
McCarthy (NY)
McCollum (MN)
McCrery
McDermott
McGovern
McHugh
McKeon
McNerney
McNulty
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Melancon
Miller (NC)
Miller, Gary
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Murphy (CT)
Murphy, Patrick
Murtha
Nadler
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Pallone
Pelosi
Perlmutter
Peterson (PA)
Pickering
Pomeroy
Porter
Price (NC)
Pryce (OH)
Putnam
Radanovich
Rahall
Rangel
Regula
Reyes
Reynolds
Richardson
Rogers (AL)
Rogers (KY)
Ross
Ruppersberger
Ryan (OH)
Ryan (WI)
Sarbanes
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schwartz
Sessions
Sestak
Shays
Simpson
Sires
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (TX)
Smith (WA)
Snyder
Souder
Space
Speier
Spratt
Tancredo
Tanner
Tauscher
Towns
Tsongas
Upton
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Walden (OR)
Walsh (NY)
Wasserman Schultz
Waters
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (FL)
Wexler
Wilson (NM)
Wilson (OH)
Wilson (SC)
Wolf
—- NOES 228 —
Abercrombie
Aderholt
Akin
Alexander
Altmire
Baca
Bachmann
Barrett (SC)
Barrow
Bartlett (MD)
Barton (TX)
Becerra
Berkley
Biggert
Bilbray
Bilirakis
Bishop (UT)
Blackburn
Blumenauer
Boustany
Boyda (KS)
Braley (IA)
Broun (GA)
Brown-Waite, Ginny
Buchanan
Burgess
Burton (IN)
Butterfield
Buyer
Capito
Carney
Carson
Carter
Castor
Cazayoux
Chabot
Chandler
Childers
Clay
Cleaver
Coble
Conaway
Conyers
Costello
Courtney
Cuellar
Culberson
Cummings
Davis (KY)
Davis, David
Davis, Lincoln
Deal (GA)
DeFazio
Delahunt
Dent
Diaz-Balart, L.
Diaz-Balart, M.
Doggett
Doolittle
Drake
Duncan
Edwards (MD)
English (PA)
Fallin
Feeney
Filner
Flake
Forbes
Fortenberry
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Garrett (NJ)
Gerlach
Giffords
Gillibrand
Gingrey
Gohmert
Goode
Goodlatte
Graves
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Hall (TX)
Hastings (WA)
Hayes
Heller
Hensarling
Herseth Sandlin
Hill
Hinchey
Hirono
Hodes
Hoekstra
Holden
Hulshof
Hunter
Inslee
Issa
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jefferson
Johnson (GA)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, Sam
Jones (NC)
Jordan
Kagen
Kaptur
Keller
Kilpatrick
King (IA)
Kingston
Knollenberg
Kucinich
Kuhl (NY)
Lamborn
Lampson
Latham
LaTourette
Latta
Lee
Lewis (GA)
Linder
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lucas
Lynch
Mack
Manzullo
Marchant
Matheson
McCarthy (CA)
McCaul (TX)
McCotter
McHenry
McIntyre
McMorris Rodgers
Mica
Michaud
Miller (FL)
Miller (MI)
Mitchell
Moran (KS)
Murphy, Tim
Musgrave
Myrick
Napolitano
Neugebauer
Nunes
Ortiz
Pascrell
Pastor
Paul
Payne
Pearce
Pence
Peterson (MN)
Petri
Pitts
Platts
Poe
Price (GA)
Ramstad
Rehberg
Reichert
Renzi
Rodriguez
Rogers (MI)
Rohrabacher
Ros-Lehtinen
Roskam
Rothman
Roybal-Allard
Royce
Rush
Salazar
Sali
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanchez, Loretta
Scalise
Schiff
Schmidt
Scott (GA)
Scott (VA)
Sensenbrenner
Serrano
Shadegg
Shea-Porter
Sherman
Shimkus
Shuler
Shuster
Smith (NE)
Smith (NJ)
Solis
Stark
Stearns
Stupak
Sullivan
Sutton
Taylor
Terry
Thompson (CA)
Thompson (MS)
Thornberry
Tiahrt
Tiberi
Tierney
Turner
Udall (CO)
Udall (NM)
Visclosky
Walberg
Walz (MN)
Wamp
Watson
Welch (VT)
Westmoreland
Whitfield (KY)
Wittman (VA)
Woolsey
Wu
Yarmuth
Young (AK)
Young (FL)
—- NOT VOTING 1 —
Weller
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
“Yes we know Jake because FOX news reported it first.”
What is with your obsession with FoxNews?
Did they start a prizes for spreading talking points program like the McCain campaign?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Blame the Dems for trying to bail out the worst President in history.
Only in a Republicans mind.
Posted by: Langx | September 29, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
This looks like another republican trap set for the dems (who actually care about America). Just enough republicans voted nay? Just enough? The dems more than did their duty. If the economy tanks, it’s on the craven politics of a sick republican party rotten at it’s core. I’ll happily live in tent and dumpster dive if it means the end of the republican party.
Posted by: Angry American Voter | September 29, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Reread what you wrote, Mr. Tapper, and I noticed this time what I didn’t notice initially. You said that you got this in your mailbox moments after the vote. It quoted Schmidt from Sunday. I had thought you were saying that the republicans had sent it along, trumpeting a success that did not happen. Now I understand, I think. WHO SENT YOU THAT EMAIL? I assume it was the Obama camp, gloating? This is hardly the time to celebrate, regardless of your politics. So, please, Mr. Tapper, tell us who sent you that quote at that time.
Posted by: moderate | September 29, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Yes, the Dems could have passed the bill by themselves. I think they were smart to wait for everyone. Why should they take the blame for this mess when it is the Republican degregulation that caused this all. “Grab your pitch forks”? What? The republican mob has taken this country to hell. We will be lucky to recover.
Posted by: fearforthefuture | September 29, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
I’ll happily live in tent and dumpster dive if it means the end of the republican party.
_________________________________
Don’t forget your tetanus shot.
Pelosi and Reid could not get all Dems to vote for this stupid bill.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Wow the Investors Business Daily blaming regulation for market failure versus greed.
What a shock.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
This how it works…
Most reps didn’t voted for it, so dems who are afraid of losing their seat voted against it.
The reps don’t want to take the burden of voting for an unpopular bill, so at the end we must all pay a much higher price..
Posted by: CLabs | September 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
NEWSFLASH: the Democratic party controls both houses of congress, and decisively the House (where the measure was defeated).
Any failure of passage therefore must be laid exclusively at the feet of Democrats.
Moreover, had Obama take McCain up on his proposal to drop everything, go to Washington DC, and WORK together JOINTLY to craft a bill with bipartisan support, a bill would be on the way to the Senate awaiting ratification as we speak.
As a Democrat now supporting John McCain, I have followed this closely.
Moreover, when a party controls a legislative body by an overwhelming majority and then fails to take action, under no plausible scenario can it blame the minority party.
No, this is not Republican politics, is legislators on both sides fearing consuant wrath—all of which could have been avoided if the two DEFACTO party leaders had just set the contest aside for a few days and solved the thing.
Obama cares not about anything but getting elected. He is the defacto leader of the Democratic Party now, and his lack of leadership is responsible for this bill’s failure.
The end.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 29, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Hey “concerned in OH,” do you know how to read? There was a deal UNTIL McCain got to the house republicans. He broke this, and he’s going to buy it, and there isn’t anything he can do to change that. the more he tries to be a great leader, the worse things get for him, and for us!
Posted by: Angry American Voter | September 29, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Angry American,
How can you howl about the fact that Republicans did not deliver the votes without acknowledging that the Democrats did not, either. Democrats have a MAJORITY in the House. If all the Democrats had voted for the measure, the REpublicans could not have killed it. They had the votes of the Republican leadership. Let’s be evenhanded in our criticism, shall we?
And thansk to the person who posted the actual names of those voting both ways. I will now go make sure my representative did the right thing, and if he voted nay, as I fear he did, I will call to complain and implore him to change his vote.
Posted by: moderate | September 29, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
This bill is supposed to be bipartisan that’s why both candidates were on board. There should be no finger pointing, and no one take credit.
First Obama last Sunday said on Face the Nation that he deserves the credit and McCain doesn’t deserve any.
Second Nancy Pelosi spoke before the House (last one to speak) and made a political and campaign speech. She injected politics when the agreement was no politics. This is for the nation.
Nancy Pelosi should be ousted as Speaker.
Posted by: zoilodel | September 29, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
This crises was caused by Barney and the very idiots that are “bailing” us out. The Democrats have a lot of nerve. I am ashamed that I voted for them all of these years. It will never be my party again.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Maybe Obama can ‘PHONE IT IN. “” and then give back the huge amounts of money he got from Fannie and Freddie !!
Posted by: jimbo | September 29, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Brenda,
I don’t remember Obama saying he would suspend ear mark spending…I do remember McCain saying he would cut it and also freeze spending. Obama fired back that ear marks make up a very small portion of the budget and that freezing of spending will also hurt the programs that are underfunded already. Instead, he said that we should ask Iraq to start footing some of the bill for securing the country (they have a $79B surplus), cut programs that are not working, and fix the ones that can be fixed.
Posted by: Mack | September 29, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
@Stephen Gianelli
NEWSFLASH: the Democratic party controls both houses of congress, and decisively the House (where the measure was defeated).
Any failure of passage therefore must be laid exclusively at the feet of Democrats.
——————————————
Gosh, wasn’t that the point of the republicans failing to vote for it in the house? so the they and McCain could blame the Dems? What do you think McCain was talking to his buddies in the house about? This is a political tactic that is hurting our economy. McCain is going down for this. In the words of Letterman, “This smells.”
Posted by: Angry American Voter | September 29, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“Nancy Pelosi should be ousted as Speaker.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 29, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Okay then. McCain get the blame no matter what happens. Dems have a MAJORITY. They could have passed it themselves. But, the fear of the upheavel at the ballot box squelched the support of those incumbatents. : ) pun mine.
Let the Blame Game begin.
Posted by: DiceMan | September 29, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
The facts are simple:
- This is a classic Prisoner’s Dilemma in which everyone wants to see the bill passed so Dow Jones will stop plunging and yet everyone wants everyone else, not themselves, to shoulder the risk of casting the yes vote.
- There are significantly more free-riders within the GOP than within the Dem. Party.
- One may accuse Pelosi of failing to bring over the free-riders in her own party. But it is absolutely ridiculous to blame her for the GOP failure. Don’t House Republicans have their leader? We call their leader minority leader, by the way.
Posted by: chris | September 29, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
There was a deal UNTIL McCain got to the house republicans.
________________________________________
The Republicans in congress wanted MORE protection for the people and ACORN out. And while the new bill doesn’t have total protection, it is HEAD and SHOULDERS above Thursday’s plan.
The first time the House GOP leadership was allowed to be a full participant was in that White House meeting. John Boehner says that no one was giving the House GOP the time of day until McCain got involved.
But I think I’ve made clear to many of you that if it were not for John McCain supporting me at the White House when I said whoa, whoa, time-out, they would have run over me like a freight train.
Thank you John McCain
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
THE BILL TODAY PROVIDED ZIPPO, ZERO, NADA PROTECTIONS FOR THE HOMEOWNER IT WAS A BAD BILL.
90+ democrats also to their credit voted against it.
Posted by: colorado | September 29, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
The culprits are primarily in swing districts. This isn’t about principle… it’s about going home and telling constituents that they “stuck it to wall street.”
Posted by: blip | September 29, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
The house Republicans said that Pelosi gave a speech that turned them off totally and thats why they voted against it…Way to go Nancy, Barney, Christopher and all you Democrats who forced banks to give out loans to unqualified people and then you also voted against any regulations. “Lets give everyone a house” whether they can afford it or not. Now look at what you all have done and Obama is in this mess up to his eyeballs !!!
Posted by: jimbo | September 29, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
“This crises was caused by Barney and the very idiots that are “bailing” us out. The Democrats have a lot of nerve. I am ashamed that I voted for them all of these years. It will never be my party again.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 29, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
There were supposed to be 50/50 participation. Dems did 60. What happened to the Repubs? No Party leader, no commitment.. all for themseleves. What a shame?
Posted by: Phil | September 29, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
the crisis wasn’t caused by “barney”
it was caused mostly by the years between 2000 and 2006
when lobbyists and spending for the wealthy and corporate greed went crazy…
the last 2 years has been trying to clean that mess up…while the same team that caused it…fought the clean up …
and now they continue to play some “feelings hurt” blow hard bologne
in the face of deregulation gone amuck.
stop the deregulation lobby is to blame first.
the same people who wrote mccain’s economic policies and platform.
this garbage about 12 people’s feelings being hurt because of Pelosi “caused them to not vote”
Posted by: dl | September 29, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“Maybe Obama can ‘PHONE IT IN. “” and then give back the huge amounts of money he got from Fannie and Freddie”
I agree Obama should give back the $120K in donations, he got from employees of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.
Right after Rick Davis & Charlies Black give back the millions they got directly from the companies into their own pocket.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Dear Leenielamb -
It still amazes me that anyone can think one man has the power to create this big of a mess – you’re wrong in stating this is all George Bush’s fault. And if anyone thinks either Obama or Sen McCain can come in and clean house in one fell swoop, they are also mistaken. It’s ‘taken a village’ to create this mess and it will ‘take a village’ to get us out of it. Again, what can possibly be gained by finger-pointing at this critical time in history? Everyone needs to get over it and lets get on with it. We’ve all lost something and no one deserves to lose their job, their retirement, their home, etc. No doubt it’s obvious I’m a McCain/Palin supporter, but I’m not dumb enough to think that this duo has the power to change the world. But they are a starting point.
Posted by: Lourie | September 29, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I agree McCAIN should get all the credit for this mess!
Give Senator McDRAMA his due!
Posted by: Truth Matters | September 29, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Question to Obamabot:
Have you read the bail out bill?
Answer: No.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
cultural amnesia
you add nothing to the debate
or your candidate…
you make adults realize that if they were voting for McCain…you would be on their side
and then they vote for Obama.
Posted by: dl | September 29, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
No Obama will text you his opinion of the bill.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Jakey, jakey, no doubt this will disappear like the rest of the pro mccain comments, but, have you not forgotten what Obama said? “Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama said Sunday his Republican rival deserves no credit for helping to forge a tentative agreement on the $700 billion bailout of Wall Street.”. Its all Obama now!
Also any comments on how there could have been a deal in place BEFORE McCain went back to Washington if 94 democrats voted AGAINST the measure? I’m sorry Jake whats that? You Obama talking points don’t include that? how odd.
Posted by: Zaggs | September 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
@Jimbo
The deregulation of the banking industry is all on the republicans. they filled their pockets with cash over the last 8 years and turned their backs on the American people. Please — buy a book, learn to read. Educate yourself.
Posted by: Angry American Voter | September 29, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
I think that Republicans should agree to vote for the “bailout” if they get a commitment from Barney Frank, as one of those most responsible for the problem, to immediately resign his seat in Congress.
Posted by: Ron | September 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Mccain
can’t get the republicans to back something he says they need to
how is that leadership.
is he going to say…Pelosi “offended” them so they voted on that instead of the welfare of the country?
throw these bums out …NOW!
Posted by: dl | September 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
thank you john mccaain if it was not for his presence on the hill the 3 page bill would be law today. with no provisions for homeowners and no accountability/oversight etc…
obama supporters are screaming please ROB US NOW FAST. very weird.
Posted by: colorado | September 29, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
“the last 2 years has been trying to clean that mess up…”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
The agreement was no politics, no fingerpointing, and everybody has to do it for the nation.
At the last minute and using her position as the last speaker where no one can rebut her, Nancy Polosi lambasted George Bush for “putting the nation on this mess”, clearly injecting politics.
She violated the agreeement and should pay for it.
Posted by: zoilodel | September 29, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Harry Reid: REID: Is this pleasant work? No, it’s not pleasant work. Look what’s happening with the calls coming into our offices and the e-mails. People are very unhappy with what we’re doing, but we believe we have an obligation to the country and that is Wall Street and Main Street.
THAT IS RIGHT HARRY AND YOUR DEMOCRAT REPS ARE AFRAID THEY WONT GET RE-ELECTED AND THREW YOU AND PELOSI UNDER THE BUS
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Oh… come on. Cultural Amnesia is a disinterested supporter of the facts. An impartial observer, known for high ethical standards.
Posted by: blip | September 29, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Thank you Mr. McCain. I was really hoping to send my daughter to a public college – but the odds of that are looking slimmer and slimmer everyday. The deal was ready to go – there was bipartisan agreement – and you flew to Washington in your private family jet and blew it. I imagine your children, in whichever of the five of six houses they happen to be in – will be very happy in their Ivy league schools.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
McCain always seems to be a day late and a dollar short.
Posted by: Blue in Michigan | September 29, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Ryan – Rick Davis is still being paid on a monthly basis for the great lobbying work he did for the lenders. Even while he is part of the McCain campaign.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
All of you: read the Congressional Records. Community Reinvestment Act passed in 1977 by Jimmy Carter’s administration and the Dem. Congress. Expanded under Bill Clinton in 1995. And pushed by Dem. Barney Frank, MA in recent years. This bill forced financial institutions to lend to the unemployed, welfare recipients and those with terrible financial records..FACT! Twice Pres. Bush tried to pass reform bills on this CRA as did his father, Sr. Bush. Their proposals were voted down..by guess who! DEMs. Ignorance Is Not Bliss! Educate yourself with FACTS; see The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.
Posted by: Cin | September 29, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Any Bailout should include plans for CRIMINAL PROSECUTION of members of the HOUSE and SENATE who have had their sleazy hands all over this fiasco. Include previous administration officials, FreddieMac overseers, and anyone else involved in this GIGANTIC SWINDLE….
Posted by: MaryEllen | September 29, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
If a package of some sort isn’t passed, they’ll all be eating crow.
The same people who are crying “no bailout” are going to be the same ones crying for the government to do something when the company they work for can’t get a line of credit to print pay checks.
Ignorance in this case is not bliss.
Posted by: Blue in Michigan | September 29, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Thank you Mr. McCain. I was really hoping to send my daughter to a public college
___________________________________
BETTER SAVE UP MARA JUST LIKE MY PARENTS DID TO SEND ME TO COLLEGE. TRY WORK STUDY PROGRAM AND ONE LESS CASE OF VITAMIN WATER FROM SAMS.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
McCain did virtually nothing to protect any homeowner, any American investor, any American worker. He flew into Washington, disrupted the entire process, and we are the ones who are going to have to pay – along with our children.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Okay then. McCain get the blame no matter what happens. Dems have a MAJORITY. They could have passed it themselves. But, the fear of the upheavel at the ballot box squelched the support of those incumbatents. : ) pun mine.
Let the Blame Game begin.
Posted by: DiceMan | Sep 29, 2008 3:50:17 PM
————-
Maybe you should read your own post, DiceMan. If your argument is that the Dems who voted against this did so because of the upcoming elections, what pray tell is the reason soooooooo many Republicans voted against it? Surely it couldn’t be for the same reason only in MUCH larger numbers. It’s their Pres, their bill, their SEC Chairman, their Treasury Secretary. If the Republicans were really putting “country first” and not “my job first”, they should’ve been the party with the higher number of “yes” votes. The bill sucks, and the need for the bill sucks even more. That being said, the Dems saw this as the lesser of 2 evils and voted for it anyway. The Republicans tucked their tails and slinked out of the room like a bunch of cowards.
Posted by: nancy miller | September 29, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Where is Obama? The man is the head of the Democratic Party. He could tell his followers in Congress that for the good of the country, they have to vote for this, awful as it is. Has he? No.
Obama is showing leadership? No.
He is voting “present” as usual, no leadership.
40% of the Democrats voted against it.
The Democrats could pass it without one vote from the Republicans.
Why couldn’t Obama and Pelosi get the votes???
Posted by: Zank | September 29, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Concerned in OH ” Lets go take this country back from these Do-Nothing Democratics.”
Wow. After all those years of a Republican President, annointed by a Republican Supreme Court in 2000, with a Republican Senate for many years, and a Republican House for many years, it’s the Democrats to blame.
That’s an incredible persecution complex you’re nursing there. What brought it out? The Democrats refusing to ‘oppress’ the Republicans and ram this bill through on their bare majority.
Your whining is not even internally consistent with the events of the last 6 hours, never mind the last 8 Republican Administration, Congress, and Court dominated years.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
At McCain was looking out for the average citizen, and not just sitting there like Obama and Pelosi giving away money to the very people who lost the billions. I don’t care if the DOW goes to zero. Maybe this country needs a kick in the butt and will stop drinking Kool Aid slurpees.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“Why couldn’t Obama and Pelosi get the votes???”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 29, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Strange thing is this bill outside of the buyout seems very familiar. Probably because it sounds near exact of the same bill McCain supported in 2006, you know the ones the democrats blocked. Where was Barry then? Oh yea, singing we are family with Fannie Mae!
Posted by: Zaggs | September 29, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
jimbo: “The house Republicans said that Pelosi gave a speech that turned them off totally”
Amazing. Is the Republican party sending kindergartners to Congress now? Their feelings were hurt so they want every retirement account, pension plan, and small business trying to meet payroll to feel their pain?
Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Where is Obama?
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 29, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Nancy Pelosi right before the vote on the biggest bailout in American history…
on a vote that she needs the Republicans to vote “yes” on the bill; on the pre-vote “pep talk” to get the Republicans on board: what does this stupid, lying, idiot do?
Pelosi bashes Bush for his chaotic economic policies, and not continuing Clinton’s surpluses.
Nancy Pelosi doesn’t spout a word about 9-11; not a word about the Democrats who ran Fannie Mae into the ground and stole from it; not a word about Dodd and Obama and other Dems being the top money grabbers of Fannie contributions. She is a total, lying, incompetent, stupid, fool.
You want their votes so right before asking for them you rip them to shreds? Even if what she said is true – it isn’t and is non-inclusive – how stupid do you have to be to go rip them and their policies and their president?
She Nancy Pelosi has to be the worst Speaker ever…
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
No doubt about it: this is very, very bad news for John McCain.
He failed to convert the House GOP (even though his campaign claimed that he did), and the stock market is in a tailspin.
McCain apparently does not even have the status of a leader in his own party.
He can forget about the Presidency now.
Posted by: matter of fact | September 29, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
You are wrong Cultural Amnesia.
We do not want to see an economic collapse. More people will lose their homes. People will starve. Some military folks have been saying that they are on alert in the event that riots break out.
This is not McCain looking out for us. This is not the GOP saving the day. These are selfish fools, Democrat and Republican, risking our modest lives so they can hang on to their jobs.
I agree Wall Street needs to be reigned in a little, but this needs to happen sensibly, not under the gun. We need to get our feet under us so we can act rationally.
Posted by: blip | September 29, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Funny how Pelosi could not get even the DEM vote she needed to pass it.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Watch the you tube video “Burning down the House “and you will see that it is the DEMOCRATS that have made this huge financial mess
Posted by: jimbo | September 29, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
jhw, who is sending in the kids exactly? Demorats have been in hyperpartisan mode over this entire bill. Supposedly according to their spin they had an agreement before McCain got back to Washington, this was without input from house republicans as admitted by Kanjorski. Yet 94 democrats voted against the bill, so what deal was in place? 2 days ago Pelosi called house republicans “unpatriotic” for “boycotting” a meeting. Boycotting as in they were either not told about the meeting or were told the wrong time (as admitted by Chris Dodd). Then after harry Reid called McCain back and MCCain took him up on it Reid said McCain wasn’t wanted (then why did Harry ask?) and spent the entire time attacking him. yet McCain is the only one who cared to try to get house republicans on board.
So lets review, house republicans didn’t like the bill in the first place, they were constantly insulted, they were left out of negotiations and just for good measure insulted right before the vote. yeah thats the bipartisan spirit america was looking for.
Posted by: Zaggs | September 29, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
WOW…
That’s quite a difference from Obama’s call to “stay calm” on the failure to pass the bill.
Since the economic crisis became an urgent and center stage issue, McCain has lost ALL credibility as a Presidential politician. Plus, the GOP vote indicates that McCain is not able to lead even in own party in any direction.
He has as much credibility now as Bush has after 8 years of miserably failed GOP politics.
Posted by: hank | September 29, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Cultural Amnesia: “Funny how Pelosi could not get even the DEM vote she needed to pass it.”
Funny how Republicans are so used to playing the victim that they are COMPLAINING that the Democrats gave them the power to stop this bill designed to accommodate the Republican administration.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“We do not want to see an economic collapse”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 29, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
You know how cynical the Republicans are when, on the one hand, they are saying:
“McCain was looking out for the average citizen, and not just sitting there like Obama and Pelosi giving away money to the very people who lost the billions. I don’t care if the DOW goes to zero. Maybe this country needs a kick in the butt and will stop drinking Kool Aid slurpees.”
And then in the next breath, they say:
“You want their votes so right before asking for them you rip them to shreds? Even if what she said is true – it isn’t and is non-inclusive – how stupid do you have to be to go rip them and their policies and their president?”
So totally disingenuous.
Posted by: blip | September 29, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Zaggs: “jhw, who is sending in the kids exactly? Demorats have been in hyperpartisan mode over this entire bill. ”
Please. This bill WAS REQUESTED AND DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION. It was the REPUBLICAN presidential candidate who tried to make it his own personal campaign commercial. It is the REPUBLICANS who have been in complete power almost 6 of the last 8 years.
And my reply was specifically aimed specifically at jimbo who said: “The house Republicans said that Pelosi gave a speech that turned them off totally”
Change the subject all you want, but Republicans are on record claiming they voted against an important piece of legislation because their feelings were hurt. Poor little babies should grow up and get back to work.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
matter of fact, sorry Obama owns this one. he said McCain deserved no credit for the bailout plan. Well guess what, means he deserves no blame either. From the LA Times Blog ” was asked by the host if he deserved some kudos, given his much-publicized “suspension” of his presidential campaign late last week to return to Washington to join in the jockeying over the bailout proposal.
“I’ll let you and others be the judge of that,” he replied.
He quickly added: “I wasn’t going to phone it in. I’m a Teddy Roosevelt Republican. I’ve got to get in the arena.” (McCain had the 26th president — his role model — on his mind today; this was the first of three times he dropped his name in the interview.)
Summing up the role he played in the bailout talks, McCain said: “I won’t claim a bit of credit, if that makes ‘em happy.”"
Posted by: Zaggs | September 29, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Belle… I know that American workers have been taking hit after hit since the late 1960s. It’s been a long slow slide for working people in this country.
But things can get worse for working people. I live in Michigan, I see, on a daily basis, just how precarious things are for working people.
Detroit, in the last few months, has gone from bad to worse. But we have not hit the bottom yet.
Posted by: blip | September 29, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
“But we have not hit the bottom yet.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 29, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
JHW, who didn’t invite house republicans into negotiations? Democrat leadership. Who kept saying a deal was made despite no talking to house republicans? Democrat leadership. who kept insulting republicans during the “negotiations”? Democrat leadership. Who said McCain needed to come back to Washington? Democrat leadership (and sec. Paulson. Yep McCain was called back he did not go as a “commercial” learn some facts idiot). Who when McCain said he was coming back immediately changed their minds and went on a partisan attack? Democrat leadership. Who lied about a deal being in place earlier last week? Democrat leadership. Who decided to set up an ambush at the white house meeting? Democrat leadership (with Obama playing the pivotal role). Who took a bill designed only for quickness of implementation and to scare everyone into action (as admitted by Paulson) and tried to hang every ornament they could from it (like ACORN and trial lawyers)? Democrat leadership. Who after abusing republicans day then decided not to make any of their ideas mandatory for protecting the tax payers? Democrat leadership. Who after all this decided minuted before the vote to spit in the eye of republicans even when they could not deliver their own caucus? Democrat leadership.
Democrats own this one.
Posted by: Zaggs | September 29, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
moderate,
Someone was pointing out to Mr. Trapper after the failed vote what a McCain person said on Sunday before the vote took place.
Posted by: Mack | September 29, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Uh oh, Jake, your mask is slipping again.
SanFranNan is the MAJORITY leader. 40% of her caucus did not vote for this bill. She only needed 13 of them.
She is not a leader. If she was, she would understand that when you compromise with people, first of all, you have equal representation at negotiations. You don’t act like thugs. Then, when you bring it to a vote, you don’t club your opposition like a baby harp seal when you are trying to get them to pass your doo-doo sandwich.
Nancy Pelosi-EPIC FAIL!
Posted by: mom2-3 | September 29, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
“He quickly added: “I wasn’t going to phone it in”
Strange thing to say considering most of his involvement was via the phone beyond the meeting with Bush and the leadership on Thurs.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
“Nancy Pelosi doesn’t spout a word about 9-11″
You wanted Nancy to add to her speech the failure of the Bush adminstration to protect us on 9/11?
I thought you were miffed because the speech was unduly partisan?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Zaggs: Spin all you want. The TRUTH is that this bill is at the request of the Republican administration. The Republican leadership is on board, including the House Republican leadership.
“Nobody wants to have to support this bill, but it’s a bill that we believe will avert the crisis that’s out there,” House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters.
Republicans killed it. Of course, they’ll never take any responsibility for anything, ever (passing the buck flows down through the whole party from the Republican leader, President Bush in the White House).
Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
And for all the “But we’ll die without this bill crowd”, why? 200 economists and alot of other intelligent people think its a bad idea.
Also what does this bill actually FIX? Does it do away with sub prime lending? Nope. Does it do away with the CRA that was forcing banks to make loans to people who alot of times could not afford them? Nope. Does it deal with the buying and selling of sub-prime mortgages? Nope.
Ooohh it reins in golden parachutes for some execs, yippe, such payouts didn’t cause this mess or even have a hand in it. it sets oversights for GSE supposedly……well they had oversight before, like the SEC and congress, whose chair will be part of that oversight and admitted their lack of oversight helped causes the problems. Congress who called such regulators racist before then they tried to do their jobs. Grand.
Its at best a temp solution so we can all do this dance again 30 years down the road.
Posted by: Zaggs | September 29, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Hey we all known the Republicans never wanted this bill to pass in the first place, But if the DEMS, who are Majority in the House cant get their own people to vote in full for this, then theres no hope!.
Posted by: Aden | September 29, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Our House of Representatives listened to over 200 of America’s top economists and smart people of this country. They did what was right not what was fast and convenient and prosperous to the very rich. The fact that the House of Representatives rejected the bail out is awesome! Here is why. The bill was a just a band-aid that still benefitted the very rich and not the people. It was not a solution to the cause of the problem. This bill would only have postponed the inevitable to just after the next President is sworn in on Jan. 29, 2009. There are real solutions to the cause of the problems of the credit crises not even considered in this terrible fast paced 700 Billion dollar extortion bail out bill for the extremely rich people of this country and around the world.
In January 2009 the 7 trillion dollars in bad mortgage loans that the banks have reported will still be unpaid. Who knows how many trillion dollars of bad mortgage debt have not been reported by the banks. 700 billion dollars won’t even come close to paying for all of this debt. Financial melt down is inevitable. Let it happen now so true recovery can begin. Bush and his Cronies did their best to ram this 770 billion dollar pay off to the rich for making this mess down our throats.
Here is some interesting info. Bush and Chaney have recently purchased homes in foreign counties to for a speedy get away to live in after their terms are over in Jan. 2009. They didn’t want this economy to blow up on them while they were still in office. They didn’t want the blame for their very real immoral, unethical and most likely illegal actions. Yeah they got both.
One last fleecing of the American people was halted by our smart members of the House of Representatives who listened to the people and over 200 of America’s top economists. We can truly thank them for listening to us.
It’s time for the people to march on Washington DC peacefully in protest if they attempt to pass this fraudulent bill again. “The only thing to fear is fear itself.” (President Franklin D. Roosevelt Democrat) Make the members of the House of Representatives and the members of the Senate know they were hired by all of us who voted for them not just a few very rich people. Make them know we are their bosses not a few rich families. We the People: Demand REAL SOLUTIONS FOR ALL PEOPLE not for just a very few extremely rich people!
Posted by: Bob4USA | September 29, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
JHW, no spin needed, democrats modified the hell out of the bill. And in the end they couldn’t get their own consensus to agree.
Rayn C, still lying eh? About what I expect from you. How many leaders did Obama meet with? None. McCain met with all a few times. yes he made phone calls but unlike your messiah he called those people on the other side of the aisle, Obama only called democrats (as Reuters reported and contrary to Barry’s own words). not to mention according to Obama he’s the only one who made calls and would get credit, so now he gets to own up to his own words for once in his life….or wil he blame an aide again?
Posted by: Zaggs | September 29, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
LOL, McBush is an IDIOT, pure and simple a complete and utter IDIOT!
Jiff
Posted by: Justin Binn | September 29, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Zagg:
“Nobody wants to have to support this bill, but it’s a bill that we believe will avert the crisis that’s out there,” House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told reporters.
That was about the EXACT bill that he, McCain and party leader, President Bush, could not get a majority of his caucus to vote for.
Nancy Pelosi brought well over a majority of her caucus along to vote for this painful, but necessary, bill.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Isn’t it ironic that the Dems who have been telling us for 8 years how incompetent Bush is, rushed to jump on board with his economic rescue plan?
Posted by: marylou | September 29, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
whats wrong with the republicans ?
They claim its because of Palosi’s speach…
They did like her speach so they kill the economy!!!
Thats smart! Like McCain claiming credit for it passing! LOL
Im pulling out my money and putting it under my bed!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
The results speak for themselves.
Heckuva job, McCainy!
Posted by: Howard NY | September 29, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
“How many leaders did Obama meet with? None.”
So his presence at the meeting with Bush and Senate leadership was a mirage?
“McCain met with all a few times.”
Met with who and when?
Was that after his interview with Couric? Or perhaps before his dinner date with Lieberman?
McCain arrived in DC Thurs morn and returned to his home after the Bush meeting.
“After the White House meeting and the Friday night debate, McCain decided against attending a bipartisan meeting of some senators.”
“yes he made phone calls but unlike your messiah he called those people on the other side of the aisle, Obama only called democrats (as Reuters reported and contrary to Barry’s own words).”
“Each candidate, when asked, released a list of names of administration and congressional officials they contacted over the weekend. Neither list included members of the other party.”
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Langs, the housing market is cyclical. When the prices go too high, people stop buying. So the prices go down. Eventually the prices level off and buying starts back up. And the prices rise again. It is simple Economics 101.
No one is to blame for that. That is the free market working exactly the way it is supposed to!
The current crisis, however, was due to too much government interference in the free market. The federal government pressured the banks to lend to individuals with low incomes–regardless of whether they could afford to pay the mortgage or not. If the banks didn’t give the loans they were subject to stiff penalties. To compound the crisis, these banks pushed flexible mortgage rates on these individuals. THAT is the real culprit in this crisis.
When prices got too high and the free market began to correct itself, the values of the homes dropped well below the balance on the mortgages. With fixed mortgage rates, the banks would have been forced to just ride out the correction. But instead, the flexible mortgage rates allowed the banks to jack up the mortgage rates. In many cases the homeowners saw their mortgage payments double and even triple. THAT resulted in hundreds of thousands of home foreclosures and left the banks hanging out to dry (so to speak).
While the Republicans are not blameless, the fact is that most of the blame is on the Democrats. Check out the article by the Investor’s Business Daily (posted Sept 15, 2008). It explains it very well. Google it!
Posted by: James Danley | September 29, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
What an ostrich and the Republicans have in common? Let me guess!
An ostrich bury its head in the sand and pretend everything is fine.
Republicans do the same and follow McCain!
I don’t have any problem in characterizing McCain .He is a Republican!
According to his own campaign, Republicans are corrupt and incompetent.
Obviously he has inside information!
Posted by: foreclosure | September 29, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Reminds me of when Bush Sr. failed to get NAFTA through congress, after which the ruling class put their weight behind Clinton.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 29, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
James Danley is living in a fantasy world where Wall Street is run by Mother Teresa and the federal government is run by Robin Hood.
In our real world Wall Street is run by Machievelli and the federal government is run by the Sheriff of Nottingham.
This crisis was precipitated by lenders forcing (often by deception) onerous terms on borrowers, many of whom actually had good enough credit to get better rates but not enough cash on hand to get a lawyer.
The crisis never would have happened had government deregulated the industry back in 1999.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
‘Scuse me, that should have been “had the government not deregulated”.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
FIRST I WANT TO THANK ALL OF YOU FOR SEEING GARBAGE AND A SCAM.SECOND IWOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT ALL POLITIONS GO TO COLLAGE TO BE WHAT,A LAWYER.LETS BRAKE DOWN WHAT A LAWYER DOES TO MAKE A LIVING. 1-THEY LIVE OFF OTHER PEOPLES PAIN.LOOK AT OUR COUNTRY.2 THEY LIVE OFF OTHER PEOPLES SUFFERING.LOOK AT OUR COUNTRY.3 THEY LIVE OFF OTHER SICKNESS.LOOK AT OUR COUNTRY.4 THEY LIVE OFF OTHERS PEOPLES INJURYS.LOOK AT OUR COUNTRY.5 AND THIS IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST MONEY MAKERS FOR THEM.OTHER PEOPLES DEATH WEATHER IN THE FORCES OR NOT.NOW I COULD GO ON, BUT LET ME ASK YOU THIS.CAN WE EXPECT ANYTHING ELES OUT OF OUR POLITIONS (LAWYERS ARE THE NOT.)HERE IS THE SOULITION TREASON CHARGES.THE OLD LAWS WILL PROBLE BE BEST.BECAUSE OUR FORFATHERS DID LET THE BIBLE GUIDE THEM.AND WHO DO YOU THINK IS GUIDING TODAY? PLEASE THINK ABOUT IT.HERE IS ANOTHER THOUGHT WE DO NOT NOT I SAY NEED ANY MORE THEN 50 POLITIONS FOR 50 STATES.THIS IS THE 20TH CENTRY IS IT NOT.NOW OUR GOVERNMENT IS GIVING PEOPLE FROM OTHER COUNTRYS.WHY ARE WE NOT GIVEN I MEAN THE(TAXPAYER,VOTER,AMERCAN).FOR VOTING ON EVERYTHING AND TAKE THE POWER AWAY.THIS WILL STOP ALL WASTED MONEY,THIS WILL STOP BAIL OUTS,THIS WILL STOP POCKET FILLING,THIS WILL STOP ANYTHING WE AS AWHOLE.WE ALSO HAVE TO TAKE ALL INSURANCE OF ANY KIND AWAY FROM ALL TAX PAID WORKERS AND DARE I SAY TELL UNIONS THAT WE THE PEOPLE SHOULD GET BEFORE EMPLOYEES.DO I SOUND LIKE A NUT ,OR DOES THIS LOOK LIKE A GO LAW TO FORCE ON POLITIONS.AND PUT THEM ON NOTICE THAT THEY WILL BE DOWN SIZED.BECAUSE WE THE PEOPLE ARE TAKING OUR RIGHTS BACK.
Posted by: C.R | September 29, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Foreclosure, one day the history books will show that it was President Bush’s domestic policies that got us through the various hits that our economy took during his first 7 1/2 years in office–at least up to the current financial crisis. We will have to wait to see how that plays out.
The 2001 Bush tax cuts turned around the 2000-01 recession. The combination of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts greatly diminished the effect that 9/11 and the corporate scandals had on our economy. Then we actually had 52 consecutive months of job growth (September 2003 through December 2007). It was the effects of the triple whammy of the slumping housing market, the subprime mortgage crisis and skyrocketing energy prices that caused the downturn in the economy. YET in spite of these latest hits to the economy, GDP actually grew the first two quarters of 2008: 0.9% growth in the 1st quarter and 2.8% growth in the 2nd quarter.
Now we have a real crisis on our hands. Government interference in the free market, lack of Congressional oversight, greed and possibly even some criminal activity have made a serious situation even worse.
I don’t know if the $700 billion rescue plan was the best plan. I think I would have preferred that the federal government guarantee the securities by purchasing insurance which would cost an estimated $50 billion. But the difference in that is the $50 billion plan would have cost $50 billion. The other plan could possibly end up resulting in some profits (depending upon how long before real estate values rise again). But either way, with the prices of homes now down considerably, there are millions of buyers almost ready to jump back into the housing market. But now there are no loans available. We need to free up the money quickly. And when that happens the federal government should offer incentives for individuals to purchase foreclosed and properties that are purchased (or insured) by the federal government, with agreements to live in the homes for at least 5 years.
Posted by: James Danley | September 29, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Mike, I agree that lenders “pushing” (forcing is a bit of an overstatement) flexible mortgage rates on home buyers is the main culprit. But I disagree with your comment that this crisis would never have happened had government deregulated the industry (which I wish they had). It was only a matter of time that the housing boom had to correct itself. With fixed mortgage rates the banks would have been forced to just sit out the correction. And there would not have been the hundreds of thousands of foreclosures. But with all of these flexible mortgage rates, as soon as the value of the home became less than the balance of the mortgage, the banks would still have raised the mortgage rates, with mortgage payments still doubling or tripling. Even individuals with great credit found it difficult to make those skyrocketed payments. And that would have been no different had the industry been deregulated.
Posted by: James Danley | September 29, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT TO THE PEOPLE WHAT REALY STARTED THIS PROBLEM.AND ALL I ASK IS YOU THINK ABOUT THIS CAREFULY,AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE STATICS FOR BEFORE OUR WORK FORCE WAS SOLD OUT(THIS BY THE WAY WAS AMERICAS BEST SECRET WAS IT NOT)NAFTA.NO FIRST OF ALL A COUNTRY THAT DOES NOT PRODUCE FOR ITS SELF.DOES NOT SERVIVE.WE NEED TO MAKE OUR EMPLOYEES (POLITIONS).RECORDS WILL PROVE UNEMPLOYMENT,WALFARE,WARS.ANY WAY I THINK YOU ARE SMARTER THEN.THE POLITIONS THINK WE ARE.WE NEED TO START CLASS ACTION LAW SUITS OF TREASON FOR SELL US OUT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE USING THEIR(POLITIONS/LAYWERS)SNAKE AGAINST THEM.LET WE THE PEOPLE USE THE TEETH OF THEIR SNAKE.WE NEED OUR COMPANYS BACK IN AMERICA,DID WE NOT HELP BUILD THEM.THE ONLY LAW THAT IS NEEDED IS THIS.IF ANY COMPANY WANTS ANY AMERICAN CONSUMER THEN IT WILL BE BUILT IN AMERCA,BY AMERICAN HANDS.AND FURTHER MORE.WE THE PEOPLE WILL NOT GIVE YOU TAX BRAKES OR ANY GIVE AWAY TO ENTISE YOU TO COME.YOU WILL MOVE BACK OR YOU(COMPANYS)WILL NOT GET THE CONSUMER OF THIS GREAT COUNTRY.NOW FOLLOW THIS WE AS A COUNTRY CAN NOT BREAK OTHER COUNTRYS.SO EVERY COMPANY WILL HAVE TO BUILD ALL OVER THE WORLD.AND COMPANYS STILL GET RICH.NO IMPORTS AT ALL FOR AT LEAST 20 YRS.WE THE CONSUMERS,TAX PAYERS,VOTERS HAVE THE POWER ESPECAULY NOW.THE SNAKE IS COILED LETS USE IT ON ITS HANDLERS.THEY ALL MADE THE LAWS THAT THE SNAKE CAME FROM NOW NOW.I FEAR FOR MY GRAND CHILDRENS LIVES.LETS DO THIS AND SHOW ALL OTHER COUNTRYS.WHAT OUR FORE FATHERS DIED FOR.WE NOW HAVE THE MEANS TO DO THIS PEACABLY AND WITH THE LAWS OF THE PAST.BEFORE THEY CHANGED IT ON US.THEY HAVE DONE ENOUGH DAMAGE DONT WE THINK.
Posted by: CR | September 29, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
McCain could not deliver his side of the aisle. Plain and simple. A failure to deliver after grandstanding about coming to DC to fix the problem. Some leadership skills he displayed.
Posted by: JackO | September 29, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Mike: Amen. I was told by my congressman today that the problem was that there was too much government regulation.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Zaggs: Doesn’t look like either side listened to McCain much and that doesn’t bode well for a President whose trademark is supposed to be action. He didn’t get anthing done, he messed what was accomplished, had a five-star dinner, and then rushed away on his provate family jet. I would love to see where the McCain’s have their assets in this “sound economy” that is going to bury the rest of us.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
This crisis is only a warm-up for the social security crash which is directly ahead of us. As we all know it’s totally underfunded but all the politicians are looking the other way and we the people of this country continue to allow them to get away with it.
Posted by: fool me once | September 29, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
rut-ro
McCain and the republican machine. Open hood remove monkey wrench.
Posted by: Omentum | September 29, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
The Republican House just put the final nail in the coffin of Reaganomics and Trickle Down Capitalism. Additionally,
they have given the Dems a green light to construct and pass a bill that will be their worst nightmare.
Hats Off to the ‘deregulators’!
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 30, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am
McCain says that it isn’t time for the blame game and then blames Obama for the bail out failure. I guess Barack was supposed to be working the Republican caucus for votes while the McCains and Sanctimonious Joe dined at the Mandarin Oriental Hotel.
McCain may has lost his bearings but his “chutzpah” is fully intact.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 30, 2008, 5:56 am 5:56 am
I am certain Senator McCain won’t make the same mistake twice. He would have brought more Republican votes to the event if he had known Pelosi couldn’t get more than 60% of the dems
Assuming that she was showing anything like leadership was a mistake
Oops
Posted by: BillB | September 30, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am