By Lee Speigel

Sep 3, 2008 6:17pm

Is the McCain Camp Spreading Smears in the Name of Fighting Them?

Did you read the National Enquirer this week?

I didn’t.

Why am I bringing it up?

Because I just got an e-mail about it from the McCain-Palin campaign.

“The smearing of the Palin family must end," said McCain-Palin campaign manager Steve Schmidt in the statement. "The allegations contained on the cover of the National Enquirer, insinuating that Gov. Palin" (something untrue) "are categorically false. It is a vicious lie. Gov. Palin is the most popular governor in the country. She is a proven leader, an accomplished executive, a champion for ethics reform, and a fighter against corruption. The efforts of the media and tabloids to destroy this fine and accomplished public servant are a disgrace. The American people will reject it. … Legal action will be considered with regard to this disgraceful smear.”

I didn’t even know such a story existed.

Any campaign faced with false allegations has to decide whether responding to them is giving them more voice and notice — certainly the campaign of Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., faced that problem for months and months with the Manchurian Muslim candidate stuff.

But this e-mail comes in the context of an aggressive pushback after only a matter of days in which the chief talking point the McCain campaign seems to have about Gov. Sarah Palin is that she’s being smeared by Democrats, the Obama campaign, and the media.

Lumped into this description of smearing are any questions about her experience, her time as mayor or governor in Alaska, her relationship to the Alaskan Independence Party — which her husband Todd was a member of, and any other issues in which you might be interested.

Obviously, they want to rally voters behind her. But are they doing Palin a service?

"Members of this campaign went to off-the-record lunches with reporters today," Schmidt told Katie Couric, Tuesday, according to Politico, "and they were asked if she would do paternity tests to prove paternity for her last child. Smear after smear after smear, and it’s disgraceful and it’s wrong. And the American people are going to reject it overwhelmingly when they see her."

First, that’s an intriguing definition of off-the-record, but second, what a reporter asks is not the same thing as what a reporter reports. It could be argued that Schmidt, raising the notion of paternity on national TV, did far more to spread that unpleasantness to millions of voters than anything anyone in the mainstream media did.

Some of the tactics the McCain campaign is using could certainly be seen as spreading rumors in the name of fighting them.

- jpt

User Comments

Perhaps, Letterman was right. why not put this family on jerry springer where they seem to belong.
Besides, the story may have legs because the Enquirer team that broke the edwards story is in Alaska and they apparently promised a scoop and they were checking out the sources.
as for mccain camp doing this- of course, it works to their advantage because they want to be talking about her and not have the media talking about issues as the campaign has said this election is not about issues but about personalities. whatever you say about Obama at least the two of them are engaged in bringing up their 2 kids. as for Biden he was willng to give up his senate career for his kids. as for sarah palin, she has a daughter who is pregnant out of wedlock.hmmmmm

Posted by: anu | September 3, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

This is quite possibly the worst run campaign in recent memory.
Why would you issue a denial for a tabloid story that has yet to even run?
Why dignify it?
Take a good look at the future McCain administration: secretive, anti-press and always reacting instead of anticipating crisis.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

“Smear after smear after smear, and it’s disgraceful and it’s wrong.”
They don’t seem to mind when Obama is the target.
Smears being debunked on snopes: McCain-4, Obama-25 and counting.

Posted by: cincyr | September 3, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

one answer….
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES.

Posted by: all-over-soon | September 3, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

jpt,
i’m glad the media is finally waking up to the fact that McCain thinks he has the MSM wrapped around his middle finger.
finally learning the MSM is not, McCain has gone into full panic mode.

Posted by: RJ | September 3, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Sarah Palin is in way over her head. I think anyone with any intelligence knows that. Some are trying to lie their way through to a Republican victory, but I think they know she should never have been the VP pick. If Palin had run for president in her own right she would have received less than 1% of the vote in any primary or caucus, probably including Alaska. Yet she ought to be number 2 in the nation? John McCain should stop insulting the American public with this nonsense. The “pushback” by McCain’s campaign on all the media investigation is desperate and hypocritical. I’m sure the Republican party is all about fighting sexism. That must be why when Palin was first named McCain’s running mate Newt Gingrich was falling all over himself calling her a “babe.”

Posted by: jon in maryland | September 3, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Excellent observation, Jake.
The McCain camp itself is trying to turn their woman into a victim in the public vetting process… thqt’s why they suddenly threw her for the lions (MSM, bloggers) in the first place… a martyr of motherhood, the feminine sex and what not… all because they hope that women, the majority of voters, will relate to that and show their massive support for the poor Palin family, who now lie awake at night.. I’d say the McCain camp is abusing her and her family. The old grumpy man must have LOVED the fact that he has a teenage pregnancy in his road show now. It’s sick, the more you think of it.

Posted by: paulism | September 3, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Anybody remember “Men In Black” and the “hot-sheets”?
The McCain campaign probably thinks we are all so dumb that we DO get our news from the hot-sheets.

Posted by: mila | September 3, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

This is not a political maverick or a strong leader. Strong leaders and political mavericks don’t resort to such low tactics.

Posted by: Anthony | September 3, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

The Republicans would have us believe that the Mayor of Moose Jaw (who had to hire a City Manager to handle the complexities involved in running a town of 7,000 people) and the twenty-month Governor of a state with a population the size of El Paso or Charlotte is the best choice to be second in command in “this dangerous world.”
If McCain had properly vetted this woman, this excruciating stream of stories on her background and family would never have happened. McCain manages to screw up the most important decision of his candidacy. He handles his own screw up by blaming it on the media and Democrats, and then lying, distracting and dividing. Sound familiar? McCain really is Bush’s third term.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 3, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Absolutely, Yup Yup. Jake, you have that right.

Posted by: AnneA | September 3, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Apparently, many other journalists are secret fans of the National Enquirer.

Posted by: Julian | September 3, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

The McCain/Reoublican strategy is to scream sexism as loud and as often as possible.
The rebuplicans ALWAYS try dividing the country any way which will help them win.
The GOP makes me sick.

Posted by: Samantha | September 3, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

“Sarah Palin runs the largest state in the union as governor.”
Yes, she runs the state with the largest land area.
I love these Orweillian talking points from the McCain campaign.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Yeah, She’s “ready for leadership” so don’t expect her to handle the negative press?
Come on John, you picked her, live with the consequences.

Posted by: Patrick | September 3, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Julian,
“Apparently, many other journalists are secret fans of the National Enquirer.”
It was all the rage with right wing bloggers just a month or so ago.
Its funny how the press is blamed for this when the McCain campaign were the ones calling it to the press’s attention.
Same with the daughter pregnancy revelation. Crazy internet rumors are responded to by the campaign with the pregnancy admitted. Suddenly the press is invading the Palin’s privacy.
Republicans have no shame.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

This is exactly right. The point is to conflate ALL stories that are negative about Palin with demonstrably ridiculous smears. This is why the McCain campaign (NOT the media) revealed Bristol Palin’s pregnancy.
The goal here is to make ALL criticism of Palin illegal.
Ugh.

Posted by: Tungsten | September 3, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

If the VP post is one foot over Palin’s heaad, the P post will be a mile over Big O’s head. Big O camp calling Palin unqualified is akin to a tar pit calling a glue stick too sticky.

Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 3, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Jake: “I didn’t even know such a story existed.”
Me neither.
What’s more, last Friday, the McCain’s were extremely pleased and proud of Palin’s family, especially the two boys in that family (did you notice that when Sarah introduced her children, she spend more than 90% of the time on the two boys and their ‘accomplishments’ (army and DS), and less than 10% of the time on the three daughters? Does she believe they haven’t accomplished anything worth mentioning?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

“So by saying the largest state in the Union, when in fact it is, it’s Orwellian?”
Yes. Orwellian deals with the manipulation of language to present an image that does not match reality.
Claiming she runs the largest state in the union without the qualifier that you are referring to land mass vs population is dishonest since the overwhelming majority of people saying largest state are referring to population rather than size.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

When Palin was mayor, she forbid people in her ‘administration’ from speaking with the press

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Hmmm. Could it be that the press is actually beginning to realize when it’s getting played by the rightwing scream-machine?
Hopeful signs….

Posted by: BBpd | September 3, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

“I don’t recall Palin begging the DoJ to investigate the Kos blogger, like Obama did with the API.”
I wasn’t aware that Kos bloggers were running an illegal 501 c funded by a TX billionaire responsible for the Swift Boat ads. I also was not aware that Kos bloggers infringed on copywright laws to produce any ads.
But Its Ok Because They Are Republicans Right?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Here are the words of Meg Whitman, McCain Campaign National Co-Chair (on Fox News no less):
“I actually think it’s completely fair for the media to vet Sarah Palin,” Whitman said, adding that it was “the right thing to do” for the media to dig into the background of someone who is “running for the highest office in the land.”
Asked directly whether there had been any media sexism, she replied: “I wouldn’t say there really has.”

Posted by: BBpd | September 3, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

wow the right-wing nutjobs sure are hateful on this board

Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

As long as we are talking about this small stuff, another day can pass without dealing with the real issues. Very clever strategy indeed.

Posted by: greg roberts | September 3, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

I’ve been watching all of this with some amusement and I’m starting to think that this is a case of ‘methinks thee dost protest too much…’
The press release announcing Bristol was pregnant was issued by the McCain campaign, and they are the ones claiming she has all this experience without mentioning specifics…but every time anyone tries to ask exactly what, they claim sexism.
It is interesting that they’ve manage to shift the focus to her, and away from him…

Posted by: cta | September 3, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

also, wouldn’t it be reasonable to just allow Palin to answer question since she and her views are so unknown. This would push all this other stuff aside. But would that work for the Republicans? What is being hidden here ?

Posted by: greg roberts | September 3, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

If she’d been properly vetted in the first place, there wouldn’t be such a storm to begin with.
And if she can’t stand up to the press, how is she going to stand up to Putin or Bin Laden or Kim? Refuse to talk to them? Haven’t we had enough of that?
I know, let’s not talk about real issues– let’s manufacture outrage to buy some time to figure out what we’re going to do about things that actually matter.

Posted by: Cmon | September 3, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Jake Tapper
You make an interesting point.
I heard another call this “a rovian” tactic.
Remember the exploitation of the media during the run-up to the war in Iraq?
i.e.: Plant stories in the media and then reference them in your own defense.
It’s brilliant just so long as the media doesn’t catch on.

Posted by: ApostasyUSA | September 3, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

It may be a tactic played by McCain’s camp to get female votes – smears Palin and plays victim to get sympathy from women.

Posted by: CT | September 3, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

“Take a good look at the future McCain administration: secretive, anti-press and always reacting instead of anticipating crisis. ” — Ryan C
Great post.. my thoughts exactly.
I don’t really care about this woman’s personal life. That her daughter is pregnant. That her sister has 9 children and is divorced (9 children because they make her around 20 grand a year). What really bugs me about this choice is that picking Palin is an obvious pander for votes. He expects women who he obviously thinks are idiots will roll over for this woman. Just because of the significant amount of die hard Hillary fans. Hillary at least acts the part of a leader and understands the US’s place in the world.
This woman just really doesn’t fit the part. Its like picking a pee-wee league QB to be the next 49′ers QB… she just doesn’t match up on a national scale.

Posted by: TimL | September 3, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

I have been convinced for a long time that it was McCain’s aides who planted the story about his staff being concerned about his time with that female lobbyists in the NY Times. The Times would go forward with the story because their sources were very credible — they were actual campaign people, after all — and then the McCain folks could bash the “liberal media elite” and unite the base right when they were most uneasy about him.
Remember, this came out right AFTER McCain had a lock on the nomination. If some liberal activists had an agenda in spreading it, it would’ve come out this summer, not in the dead of winter. And if the NY Times had it in for McCain, which is preposterous but that’s the line they right wants to allege, then they, too, wouldn’t have chosen a moment on the political calendar when there would be no impact.
The only one who had anything to gain with that NYT story coming out when it did was McCain himself. It gave him an opportunity to get the cuckoo right-wing chatterboxes that had been beating the crap out of him (Rush, Hannity, O’Reilly) for not being a real conservative on his side for a change.

Posted by: dan | September 3, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Maybe if the McCain camp had vetted their candidate weeks, instead of 24 hours, before we wouldn’t be wasting our time.
I’m sorry … but mayor of a town of a few k and govenor of Alaska (which has less pop than my town) does not make a candidate that is second in line for the presidency.
I like my president to be smarter and more experienced than me. I respect McCain, but this candidate is not qualified to be a seat away from President.

Posted by: Paco | September 3, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

At the end of the day, the real story is that in his first major executive decision, McCain failed on a massive degree. He made a heavily uninformed and irrational pick.
He is not Presidential material.

Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Concerned,
Looks like you got angry.
“So, is saying Lugar-Obama is an example of bipartisanship when it passed unanimously by voice vote Orwellian?”
The response of Lugar-Obama and Coburn-Obama was prompted because another poster said Obama never works across the aisle. That was untrue and those are just two examples.
If working with Republicans to pass legislation is not bipartisanship than what is bipartisanship?
“Is stating unproven accusations as fact a manipulation of language to present an image that does not match reality?”
Yes I consider most of your posts to be quite Orwellian. But why the admission are you taking the McCain path?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

I have come to the conclusion that there are far too many extremists who either work for the campaigns or are wantabes. Please, get a grip. Anything taken to an extreme is bad. As for Orwellian – oh come on. In 3 grade I learned that Alaska is the largest state in the Union, it wasn’t Orwellian then and it isn’t Orwellian now. It simply is the largest state. If people are so stupid as to not know the difference between the most populous or the largest state in area they shouldn’t be voting. The angst on the site is quite sad.

Posted by: jd | September 3, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

{something untrue}
The point isn’t that it’s untrue – it may be true. The point is that it’s nobody’s g*dam business but the Palins. It has absolutely nothing to do with Gov. Palin’s performance as an elected official.
Of course, us Dems tried making the exact same point during the various Clinton sex “scandals,” but nobody listened.

Posted by: Peter Principle | September 3, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

Folks, Sarah is just a lady who happens to have been chosen for VP. I think there is a lot more garbage that needs to be reported on Obama so we should quit wasting our time talking about Sarah. She isn’t tied to any of the shady characters that Obama is linked to. Why can’t you accept the fact that women are capable leaders and stop trashing them?

Posted by: tigg | September 3, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

John McCain: “We’re not answering any more questions about Sarah Palin’s background.”
Let’s see…..where have I heard someone refusing to answer questions and telling his subordinates didn’t have to either………..mmmmmmmmmm…..
Oh yes, I remember…….George W. Bush refuses to answer questions that are uncomfortable. John McCain is more of the same.
Sorry John McCain you are really just John McBush with a history of cancer.
VOTE OBAMA/BIDEN TAKE AMERICA BACK

Posted by: GOD WILL VOTE FOR OBAMA | September 3, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Everything and anything is open for review and discussion on anybody at anytime running for the number 1 and number 2 spot in the World – i.e. the USA. It happens in the largest of corporations and it should happen here. If it does not matter to you, then vote the way you want to vote.

Posted by: Jean | September 3, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Jack Thompson,
Adding attorney to you name doesn’t add any authority.
It just makes you look silly when you fall into rw talking points.
Fact: The McCain campaign contacted the press to tell them about this story. The Enquirer has yet to publish it.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Something is amiss. Assume she was throughly vetted, you would assume the McCain campaign would have a less panicky response to the “revelations.” I don’t know what the exact story is, but I do know there is a legitimate story here that will be burning right through the second Tuesday in November.

Posted by: martymar | September 3, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

I demand a paternity test for Palin’s 5th child. No woman looks that svelte at over 7 months pregnant. No woman has her water break in Dallas, then gives a speech, flys coach-class for 8 hours back to Anchorage and then drives another 45 minutes to her home town to deliver a premature baby. Pointing out the obvious is not a smear. The story proves that Palin will lie about serious issues, even the maternity of her own grandson, just to earn political favor.
Palin’s involvement with the Alaskan Independence Party proves that she is insufficiently patriotic and unloyal to the United States.
McCain’s choice of Palin proves that he can’t be trusted to make well-informed decisions. He’s all gut, no brain.

Posted by: Jeremiah | September 3, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

So bipartisanship requires passing bills that will be difficult.
It can’t be about both parties to coming together for the betterment of our country?
Orwellian to the core there, concerned.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Concerned,
Is the API funded by a Texas billionaire who was part of the Swift Boat ads?
Yes.
Are they currently spending money only on political ads disqualifying them from 501 (c) status?
Yes.
Are they using copywrighted material without permission?
Yes.
Those are the facts.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

One may wonder how our country got so off track and away from the people… Then you read blogs like this and the hateful and all mighty way of thinking shared by most Republicans and suddenly it all makes sense. I am not saying I am an Obama fan but it is obvious that the Republicans have done enough.

Posted by: Cheryl | September 3, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

Tip. Read Drudge more often.

Posted by: Sally J. | September 3, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

“How could the Tax Policy Center, which is a joint venture of two liberal think tanks, all of sudden become ‘independent’?”
If FoxNews can be called fair and balanced. The Tax Policy Center can be called independent.
So what did you find wrong with their analysis? That they did not include McCain’s spending cuts which he has yet to detail?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

I take it you’ve had a chance to look over their disclosure forms, right? Because if you haven’t, then you’re just stating Obama’s unproven accusations as fact.”
The lawyer for AIP is well-known conservative attorney Cleta Mitchell, who says that she expected this.
The intricacies here are substantial, to say the least. At the simplest level, AIP has tax-exempt 501(c)4 status, which it picked up from a conservative organization that had gone defunct.
AIP is using that tax exemption, even though it’s less than a month old, and its first action is this big campaign ad. With this tax status, AIP’s primary purpose can’t be political. Lawyer Cleta Mitchell says they have the rest of the fiscal year to balance things out.
Mitchell says she told AIP’s leadership, “If you want to do this, you have to make a commitment that you’re going to be active, certainly for the next two or three years,” Mitchell says. “And so, don’t just think this is going to be some flash in the pan over Nov. 5, because that doesn’t work.’ And they went away and came back and said, ‘We want to do that.’”
Like I said the only money they have spent is on political ads. DOJ should investigate. But its nice to know you condone scummy activity by your fellow Republicans.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I am continually amazed at the depth of hypocrisy shown by the Republicans in general and the McCain campaign in particular. Why is it okay to continually attack Obama for lack of experience, but if the same issue is raised about Palin, it’s sexist? We the people have every right to examine and question the credentials, or lack thereof, of anyone running for public office, including someone who will be a hearbeat away from the Presidency. If they didn’t want the press scrutiny, Palin should never have accepted the veep spot.

Posted by: Traci | September 3, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

“EXECTUTIVE experience”
Now that’s funny. Smearing themselves with that one. You wanna see some real smears?
WHAT SOME OF THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW HIM BEST SAY ABOUT JOHN MCCAIN…….
“He is a vicious person”
Former representative Charles LeBoutillier R-NY
“An embarrassment to the party”
Arizona GOP state senator Susan Johnson
“There is nothing redeeming about John Mccain…he’s a hypocrite”
Former house GOP whip Tom DeLay
“The thought of him being president sends a chill down my spine. He is erratic”
Senator Thad Cochran, R- MS
“Hard headed is one way to say it. Arrogant is another way to say it. It’s a quality about him that disturbs me”.
Larry Wilkerson, former chief aide to Colin Powell
“What happens if he gets angry in a crisis…? It’s the president’s job to negotiate and stay calm. I just don’t see that he has that quality”.
Former Arizona GOP chairman John Hinz
“His temper would place this country at risk…and the world perhaps in danger. In my mind that should disqualify him”
Former Senator Bob Smith, R-NM
“I decided I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”
Senator Pete Domenici, R-NM
Pete…..that is mad funny!!!

Posted by: ApostasyUSA | September 3, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Concerned in OH,
Your sarcasm is dripping with immaturity. If you were really all that concerned you would not be voting Republican.

Posted by: desensitized | September 3, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

ApostasyUSA,
Great find!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Is there a reason why noone is stating the obvious? Both candidates are horrible candidates to represent our country and take over the mess that Bush is leaving behind. It’s unfortunate that the country is going to hell and all you people can do is sling mud at eachother because you think it makes you stand for soemthing. Maybe it’s the first time you have ever stood up for anything, but standing up for one horrible candidate over the other horrible candidate is a lost cause. We all know that America, as we know it, is going down the crapper with Bush sitting in the oval office. So, my vote is going to the person who clearly agrees to disagree with Bush’s tactics in every aspect.
That’s my two cents, take it how you want, but that’s the way it is.

Posted by: an American | September 3, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Apparently freedom of speech is a theory around here, huh?

Posted by: desensitized | September 3, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Admittedly I don’t like what Palin stands for, but what I think I really fear (and what is hitting my hot buttons) is that she truly appears to be an extremist. She accepted the nomination knowing that her daughter was pregnant out of wedlock and subsequently would have to undergo the harsh glare of the national spotlight. UGH! What truly loving parent – male or female – puts their political ambition before the pain it is going to bring upon their child? I can’t imagine asking that out of anyone I love.
Unless, of course, they are an extremist? Does Palin feel like she’s the only choice to bring her brand of morality to America? It brings to my mind crazies, dictators, fascists and religious zealots. Those types that speak out of one side of their mouth while the other side is busy dirtying the laundry.
And yes – other candidate’s children have gotten themselves in the limelight as well – but after the fact. The Bush girls well knew what they were doing when they went out partying, for example.
To me it seems obvious that Palin has chosen to espouse a belief (abstinence education being the way to bring down the problem of teen pregnancy) she can’t even inspire in her own children. The reason she is unqualified to be in a position of power is because she can’t even positively influence those closest to her.
Someone said Jerry Springer – she brings to mind those people I’ve known that always have some issue going on. Drama queens.

Posted by: Dawn M | September 3, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

I couldn’t agree more. As a woman I feel insulted that the mccain campaign would even begin to think that Hillary supporters would be swayed by this selection.

Posted by: desensitized | September 3, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Sounds to me like the MSM has figured out they overstepped the usual bounds of decency and so instead of taking responsibility, they’re going to pretend that maybe the McCain campaign put out the ugly rumors about Palin.

Posted by: Sarah for president | September 3, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

I can’t believe you care so much about his running mate. Female or not, pregnant teenage daughter or not, who cares?!?! The real issue is, what is going to happen to the country if we continue in the same direction we’re going….which clearly is the issue, NOT whether or not some lady that just entered the campaign has pregnant teenage daughter or not.
What we need is a complete U-turn from the destination where we’re headed.

Posted by: an American | September 3, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

By the way, ending your comment with a Jerry Springer quote automatically nulls all your credibility.

Posted by: an American | September 3, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

At this point nothing is protecting us from the government. But, dully noted!

Posted by: desensitized | September 3, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

“The point isn’t that it’s untrue – it may be true. The point is that it’s nobody’s g*dam business but the Palin’s. It has absolutely nothing to do with Gov. Palin’s performance as an elected official.”
Not necessarily true, when one is a severe proponent of a certain policy or ideology and something happens which shows that policy did not work for you ( abstinence only), the public has all the right to know.

Posted by: cooper | September 3, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Protection from the government??? I’ve never even heard from the government on any issue of my life. What I want to know is, who is going to protect me from the IRS taking all my hard earned money just to send bombs towards some irate iraqi’s?

Posted by: an American | September 3, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Put a script in front of Palin and watch her lips move. God help us.

Posted by: hamishdad | September 3, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

It is the Obama campaign who is planting the rumors, starting with the fever swamps of the Daily Kos, with whom Obama has a chummy relationship, knowing that the msm will then take it and run with it, in their determination to see their ONE elected. No one is allowed to stand in his way.

Posted by: CS | September 3, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

No one is allowed to stand in his way… including an inadequate candidate and a couple of Bush clones.

Posted by: desensitized | September 3, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Now how in the world do you KNOW that Obama campaign is spreading rumors about anyone? Did you talk to Obama? Do you work for Obama? Did you spread the rumors yourself? Quit saying so and so did this, that, or another when you don’t even what you’re talking about. The Vice President isn’t even an issue, they don’t make any decisions whatsoever. The elected president keeps them on a leash and feeds their opinion to them for breakfast.
The real issue is….WHO IS BEST FOR THE COUNTRY, FOR THE PEOPLE, FOR US AMERICANS??? Who cares about some pregnant 17 yr old and her opinion fed mother.

Posted by: an American | September 3, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

That’s the point. Where is the bashing going? What is the point to it? So far, I haven’t learned one thing new about who is best for the country from you people. I’m asking a very simple question over and over. Who is best for the country, the people, us americans, and why? Yet noone has anything to say other than “Palin is a bad pick because she has pregnant teen and seems to be an extremist”
So I ask again, WHO IS THE BEST CANDIDATE FOR US AMERICANS AND WHY?

Posted by: an American | September 3, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

THANKS TO JOHN McCAIN FOR SENDING OBAMA HIS EARLY CHRISTMAS PRESENT!!! SARAH PALIN!!!! Of all his possible VP picks.. this idiot takes Palin???? Ummmmm ok…good one John. You definately are not getting my vote for President. You are George Bush all over again, you DO NOT THINK BEFORE YOU ACT!!!!

Posted by: Shelly B | September 3, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

“You are George Bush all over again, you DO NOT THINK BEFORE YOU ACT!!!!”
Now there is a very good reason why not to vote for McBush. Thank you Shelly. I completely agree with you.

Posted by: an American | September 3, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Really. When I heard who he had chosen I was on my knees thanking the political Gods! The next couple of months will now simply be a formality until Obama can get in there with the disinfectant and start the clean up.

Posted by: desensitized | September 3, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Of course they are, they know they can’t win on issues.
McCain’s new slogan….POLITICS FIRST, COUNTRY LAST

Posted by: McCain/Palin = Bush/Rove | September 3, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Hell hath no fury like slime masters on whom the tables have been turned. After months of sliming Obama and outright lying about his tax and energy proposals, the McCain people are all incredulous and sputtery that the media has the temerity to question McCain’s judgment and vetting process and Palin’s qualifications, experience and extremist politics!
Also, if Palin’s seventeen year-old daughter’s pregnancy is a “private matter,” why was Baby Daddy trotted out to greet McCain at the airport in St. Paul? You can’t play this both ways.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 3, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Ever notice how Republicans always need to use war, pain, torture and tough talk in order to win elections. Don’t you think maybe it’s all they got. They definitely don’t know how to run a country. They’ve proven that for 8 years now. All they do is Glorify war. While the Democrats glorify peace. While poor families of this country fight the wars. The USA is not a sports team. And wars are not sport. We’ve been misled for 8 years and I for one will not be misled by them again.

Posted by: jw360 | September 3, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

No wonder the media has been slandering Sarah Palin. They’re scared to death Republicans are going to have the first woman president.
She was awesome!

Posted by: Sarah for president | September 3, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Sarah,
When the lights go down and it’s all said and done honey and all the speeches are set. The truth will be told and that’s Americans won’t be giving any Republican another 4 years of running the country. And when the economy improves and after 8 years or responsible, hard work by a Democratic Majority in Congress, We will have another 8 after that, and another and another. Until finally the Republican Party splits and 2 new parties. There is not a chance in hell Real Americans are going to vote for some Jesus Freak, evolution denying, creationism preaching, abortion & gay marriage outlawing, free speech denying, piece of crap like you into the white house. If they do I’m leaving this country for good. Why don’t you move to Germany and push your facist beliefs on them, because you’re just an ignorant redneck to me.

Posted by: playin vp | September 4, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

She doesn’t even believe global warming is real. Well did you read today’s news? North pole ice cap now an island.
Are we really going to put someone in office like this while the world goes to hell? And did you see how much respect she showed Al Gore. The subhuman basically called him a hypocrit because has a private plane. More jealousy from the right because he won the Nobel Peace Prize. Who is the real hero here. Someone trying to save the planet from ruin, or some jerk that left his wife when she was crippled in a car accident for Millionaire Cindy McCain so he could persue a political career? Stop using your POW torture years as a crutch Johnny, save it for your brainless grandkids so you can tell the what a hero you were and continue to glorify war for your little Republicanites that I’m sure will grow up to be War heros just like you.
Screw the polar bears right Sarah? Let them die. That’s how you handled it in Alaska right? Who cares if we kill off one of God’s great creations. Right? Now who’s the hypocrit?

Posted by: polarizer | September 4, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

One things clear from her speech- she can ooze sarcasm like none other. Commuuuunnnnniityy Orrrgganniizzzzeeeer?
You have GOT to be kidding me, right?
It felt for a moment like I was watching a Rush Limbaugh produced version of Saturday Night Live.

Posted by: Sean o | September 4, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

I wouldn’t put it past the McCain camp..they are deserately trying to manage McCain’s and Palin’s image in the media….They think attacking the media makes points. Vetting a candidate’s truthfulness and asking tough questions is the media’s job! By the way, Republicans keep pointing to Palin’s 80 percent approval rate after less than 2 years on the job. Might I point out GWB had an approval rate of 80% after two years as well and we all know how that turned out. The fact is she is one bad decision away from turning her popularity in the opposite direction. Palin does not have the experience to be VP and no amount of image making by Republicans is going to change that.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 4, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Brooklyn Democrat,
I’ve said it before but….Republican hypocrisy knows no bounds….and neither does their absurdity.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 4, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Republican strategy is to hit the news with Palin. Keep the spotlight. AND STAY AWAY FROM THE ISSUES THAT NEED TO BE DISCUSSED. AS A FEMALE I AM INSULTED MCCAIN CAMPAIGN IS CLAIMING “GENDER BIAS” WHEN NO GENDER BIAS HAS BEEN SHOWN. I SAW OBAMA WAS NOT DOING – THEY HAVE ACTUALLY BEEN QUITE GRACIOUS. MEDIA HAS BEEN VETTING, BUT HAS DEFINITELY NOT SHOWN ANY GENDER BIAS. THIS IS AN INSULT TO ALL WOMEN! REPUBLICANS HAVE SAID WE WOMEN ARE TOO STUPID! WE ARE TOO STUPID AND WILL JUMP ON THEIR BANDWAGON BECAUSE THEY ARE CLAIMING GENDER BIAS. I HAVE READ THIS BOOK AS WELL – USE OF THIS “POPULIST” PSYCHOLOGICAL POLITICAL CAMPAIGN APPROACH FOR ALL VOTERS IS ACTUALLY REPUBLICANS ARE DEGRADING THE INTELLIGENCE OF ALL VOTERS – MEN AND WOMEN.

Posted by: Sharonklim | September 4, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

They need to make sarcastic remarks because it’s all they got. She’s obviously scared Barack is going to say something about her being a Beauty Queen. Hmm Beauty Queen / Community Organizer. I think I go with Community Organizer. Fact is Barack could have done anything he wanted, but chose to help the poor. Do they really think it’s a good idea to attack that? Show’s you where there priorities are. Hmmm help the poor or have them kiss our buttocks, and show them how popular and better we are than them. She reminds me of the ruthless bullies in school that needed to pick on anyone and gang up on anyone in order to get ahead. Total garbage. She’s not my leader.

Posted by: pleeeze palin | September 4, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

A question for all the Republicans out there?
Is she really the best & most qualified Republican VP candidate that you have?
I could name at least 3 Republican candidates that still has the respect and trust of the general population.
McCain has clearly shown that he wants to win at all cost, even if it means sacrificing America.

Posted by: Elitist | September 4, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

I think Chris Matthews made this point yesterday.
The McCain/Palin spokesperson couldn’t point to a single mainstream news story that was “pushing” these rumours about Palin — all the pushing seemed to be coming from the McCain/Palin camp.
I saw evidence of this on Joe Scarborough this morning.
Joe himself brought up a rumour out of the blue — sort of off-topic, if you ask me.
No one else except Pat Buchanan commented — everyone else just looked sort of awkward.
Then Mica changed the subject.
(Good job, Mica!)

Posted by: Liz | September 4, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Keep an eye on the McCain Campaign. They have nothing to run on so what they are doing is setting up anti-Palin strawmen so that they can knock them down and run against the media.

Posted by: Christopher London | September 4, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Finally someone says it! Tuesday night and last night everyone kept citing questions and accusations about whether “Palin could be a good parent while serving as VP. They never ask Barack Obama that question…” Who ever said or asked that? I’ve not read anything of the kind, and I sometimes visit “liberal” media sites like The New York Times, ABC News, and The Washington Post, as well as the more “balanced” sites like Drudge and FOX. So, where did that come from?

Posted by: MildlyMisanthropic | September 4, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

She’s boring me already. Can we talk about the issues? They seem to be protesting to much. It makes me wonder what she does have to hide. A simple DNA test conducted by an independent third party could clear all this up.
When is the McCain camp going to get a reporter close enough to her to ask which books she wanted banned?

Posted by: Sara B. | September 4, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

This is what a campaign gets to deal with following shallow vetting. The National Enquirer story has some probability of being true based on the loose moral values of Sara Palin as told by her college classmates; she was an available party girl. The McCain Campaign and Republican Party can sue the Enquirer and already we see the legal undermining attempt of her Alaska attorney to discredit the illegal influence issue; Palin promised full support of the legislative investigation only to refuse to give depositions. Once again, we are seeing the long reach of the Republican Party to corrupt another legal process. More of the same, McSame!

Posted by: Lou R | September 5, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

What’s going to be difficult for the McCain campaign is all the right wing pundits(such as the National Review) praised the National Enquirer and blasted MSM for not reporting on the Edward’s affair.

Posted by: tags | September 5, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

This is funny. The media personally attacks her for days and days and days and now you all think she should give an interview….on the issues…because they’ve been SO interested in her position on the issues you must be just positive that the first question on the minds of the media elite will be about her position on Iran. If you want to get into personal transgressions….well, we can do that…Obama has many of his own…you all tell me it doesn’t matter, his past drug use and association with Bill Ayers etc. etc. etc. Well, if you take that off the table then lets move on from the freakin’ Republican VP nominee’s personal issues.

Posted by: LJ | September 6, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.