By Arnab Datta

Sep 2, 2008 11:04pm

Lieberman Gets the Republicans to Clap for Everything They Hate About McCain

Sen. Joe Lieberman, the self-styled "independent Democrat" from Connecticut, just spoke.

He got the GOP conventioneers to cheer for former President Bill Clinton, saying that Clinton — unlike Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, Indy Joe said — "stood up to some of those same Democratic interest groups and worked with Republicans to get important things done like welfare reform, free trade agreements, and a balanced budget."

The whole thing was odd. Even beyond Bill Clinton, he got Republicans to cheer for other things they don’t support.

Such as McCain’s record of working across the aisle on legislation Republicans loathe — "to reform our campaign finance, lobbying and ethics laws, to create the 9/11 Commission and pass its critical national security reforms, and to end the partisan paralysis over judicial confirmations," Lieberman said.

McCain-Feingold? Hated by Republicans. Hated, hated, hated.

The 9/11 Commission?

Need I recall what conservative star Ann Coulter said about the 9/11 widows while selling books to this very crowd?

Judicial confirmations?

These people had fits about the "Gang of 14."

"If John McCain was just another go-along partisan politician, he never would have led the fight to fix our broken immigration system or to do something about global warming," Lieberman said. "But he did!"

Republicans clapped, but my God it was some of the least sincere applause I’ve heard since my 5th grade piano recital.

Immigration reform? Global warming?

This shows you just how worried Republicans are about losing. And how McCain might be the only Republican to make this race competitive.

These people don’t like bipartisanship! They’re Republican delegates!

**

Oh…I almost forgot Lieberman’s obligatory reference to the Lord: "God only made one John McCain, and he is his own man."

Not to get picky…but he is John Sidney McCain the Third.

Ok, that’s nitpicking. Sorry.

- jpt

User Comments

Lieberman was awesome. I am also a democrat who will be voting republican this year (Hillary ’12) and he spoke to my heart. Good job.

Posted by: Ted | September 2, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Doesn’t Joe realize Democrats hate his guts and that he just helped motivate the party even more then it already is.

Posted by: jim | September 2, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

My favorite part was when he got everyone to clap for the presidency of Bill Clinton. Hysterical!

Posted by: PJ | September 2, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

With Democrat majority in both the Houses, we don’t have to worry much about extremist Republican policies.

Posted by: Julian | September 2, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Former Vice Presidential nominee for the Democratic Party—awesome indeed.

Posted by: cardinal | September 2, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Democrats who would vote for McCain are resentful and stupid people voting against the interests of their nation and their children.

Posted by: RD | September 2, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Everyone at this convention looks soooo OLD, goofy and out of date. I want my country to move forward not backwards with all these old people. No fresh ideas for this country….

Posted by: Matt | September 2, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Obama mentioned Reagan the other night and the dems clapped. This happens.
Lieberman was great. It was fun telling my 12 year old that this was the man the dems wanted to be VP 8 years ago!

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Matt,
Yes, look at Obama’s VP – he’s old.
Makes McCain’s pick look fresh and forward thinking.
McCain/Palin – the right choice.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

It will be great to have women lose their rights and go to jail for stopping a pregnancy no matter if they were raped.
It will be great to have our children and partners be drafted to a war without end.
It will be great to have another fundamentalist Christian in the government who believes that the world was created in 7 days and that Jesus will come down in a cloud.
With Cain we are about to go back to the corrupt middle ages.

Posted by: Al | September 2, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

These conventions really show up the differences in the parties.
The dems live in never never land and the GOP lives in the real world.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Fred made some hilarious points about taxes and how stupid the tax “reforms” of the democrat party are.
He had ‘em rolling. But it’s easy. The dems are too easy to make fun of.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Great line about Obama’s stupid remark about abortion being “above his pay grade”
Brought the house down.
This convention is great so far. Awesome!

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

The Democrats did to Joe Lieberman rhat they did to Hillary Clinton. Bad Move!!!

Posted by: Walsh | September 2, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Lieberman is amazing!!
He supports the Corrupt and deceiving Republican Party!!
This year we have only one choice:
Honesty, responsibility, jobs, no war, medical health, true moral standards, and intelligence.
This year,
Democrats all the way!!

Posted by: voter | September 2, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

As i watch the republican convention, I am in awe at how boring, how old, how white and how devoid of ideas this party truly is.
They rolled out a tribute to Ronald Reagan…in 2008.
The soaring, awe inspiring Joe Leiberman is speaking now.
1300 people fell asleep in the convention hall.

Posted by: kate | September 2, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Why doesn’t Palin like America?

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

It may be a long, long time before we get a chance again to vote for someone with as much substance and character and country loyalty like John McCain. We must make him our president. It’ll be an honor to vote for him.

Posted by: Beth | September 2, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Al, not if there’s a Democratic Congress. Legislation going to the Pres. goes through them first. The Supreme Court may only make decisions based on the existing Constitution, not the one they wish they could have.

Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Kate, you need your eyes checked because I see a very diverse crowd of young and old.
The democrat convention is the one that was full of old geezers who didn’t even look very smart. but of course they aren’t.
And Reagan inspires the nation and that’s why they rolled this out.
I see that you’re worried about this election now and that’s a good thing.
Obama is toast – get use to it.

Posted by: Beth | September 2, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

Then Lieberman pointed out…
“John McCain turned his back on ‘immigration reform’ during the primaries, saying he wouldn’t vote for his own bill.”
The crowd roared!
“How John McCain broke the law by using public financing as collateral for a loan before he decided to go without public financing.”
They were enthused!
“John McCain said the Bush tax cuts were unconscienceable before he said he supported them.”
The crowd stomped their feet!
“John McCain opposed all funding for renewable energy, opposed increasing the fuel efficiency standards that would have resulted in the U.S. importing 20% less crude oil than today.”
Then the crowd started laughing, at America.

Posted by: John's conscience | September 2, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

How AWESOME is it that the DEMOCRAT VP candidate from 8 years ago is speaking at our convention and supporting OUR candidate??!!
Unprecedented. Historical.
That’s gotta hurt. Ouch. Lol.

Posted by: Beth | September 2, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

kate…
so how does that make you feel about your party when they lose in november??

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

It was as if a giant applause sign was giving them signals.
Some delegates looked confused as they cheered for…wait for it…Bill Clinton!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Somebody should have given Fred Thompson some Halls cough-drops.

Posted by: MsKay | September 2, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Good work Joe, time warp the republicans back eight years when McCains own party wouldn’t have voted for him as dog catcher.
Oh, and that was also when the evangelicals considered McCain a heretic, but now he gave them sister Sarah so now they like him.

Posted by: Hypnotized | September 2, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Great Convention! Putting “Country First”…unlike the DemWit candidate, NoBama, putting “himself” first! Keep it up, GOP, we Americans want to put our Country First!
Can’t wait to hear Gov. Palin, the next Vice President of the United States speak tomorrow night! She’ll take care of business and bring even more support for the GOP this year!
McCain/Palin 08!
Country First!

Posted by: david from texas | September 2, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

“Our country matters more than party”
Joe Lieberman
Only in OUR party Joe, and I think you’ve started to realize that!
Go Joe! Go McCain!

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

I’ve watched some of this on NBC and the pundits look so glum as they realize this election may be over for Obama.
LOVE IT!!

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Jo
Boring! Even the commentator have noted that there were a lot of empty seats! I heard a lot of talk about the dems but did anyone notice that the Repubs never mentioned any policies that they would put forth?
You can spin all you like but this was a disaster! Lieberman’s voice is as dull and wimpy as McCain’s! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

Posted by: gabby | September 2, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Remember when Obama said “This isn’t about me, it’s about you?”
Yeah, that’s why he said the word “I” about 2000 times.
LOLOLOL. You can’t make this stupid dem stuff up.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Irma,
I thought the same as you, but it is not true.
When Cain chooses the 3 or 4 new judges that will be changing in the next few years, the Rove case will come back again.
Republicans have been waiting for years for this opportunity.
And when Rove is gone, women will go to jail if they stop a pregnancy and will lose their rights.
Hillary explained this with clarity a few months back.

Posted by: Al | September 2, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Gabby,
Yeah, Ann Curry noted that and we do have a hurricane going on,
But nice try. She even went on to admit it will be packed tomorrow night for Palin.
Left out that little fact, didn’t cha??!!
LOL. You lose.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

One thing I noticed that Thompson really brought out, is the fact that Obama says he wants to tax businesses, but not the average American…..LOL….
Americans buy groceries, gas, work for, etc. for theses businesses, so the businesses pass the tax onto the average American!
Obama, needs to get a brain….as always, he’s an “empty suit with no substance!”

Posted by: david from texas | September 2, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Go Joe! Go McCain!
Posted by: Jo
Don’t worry! They’ll be gone soon!

Posted by: gabby | September 2, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

Gabby, you must have the democrat convention on Tivo and watching it.
They’re excited at this one.
But thanks for trying.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

david from texas,
AMEN.
P.S. I’m in Texas too! :)

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

The conservative base is pumped. This is Obama’s worst nightmare.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

That trumps all.
Posted by: Jo
It would have if he’d actually won!
They’ve just announced that the Washington post just announced that Palin didn’t tell McCain that her daughter was pregnant until Wednesday, the day before he selected her! Are you kidding me? Sound Judgement? Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha. The press will eat this woman alive!

Posted by: gabby | September 2, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm

Yes, I’m biased, but having Lieberman speak strikes me as a really poor decision. Half of this country voted for him (& Gore) 8 years ago, half against. Now he’s trying to speak to the half that voted against him while the half that voted for him absolutely revile him. So who does this bring you?

Posted by: CJ | September 2, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Wow…no mention of Thompson’s speech? That was the best speech of the night.
I thought Lieberman did okay. Was much more of an I love America feel than I felt last week watching the DNCC, that was all about Obama.

Posted by: KB | September 2, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

the last eight years have been the worst in the hisory of all civilzation…. my god thats played out too

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Beth
FYI, Lieberman is a regestered Independent! Of course he didn’t mention that. By the way, Thompson coughed 77 times! I’d say it’s an omen!

Posted by: tam | September 2, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Joe Lieberman had the greatest effect he will ever have on national politics tonight… he pumped up the Democratic base like no one else could. Thanks Joe! Joe’s Motto: Joe First (What else is there?)

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 2, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

McCain says he doesn’t understand the internet or computers and that he has “other people do that for him.”
with the McCain/Palin ticket, we can officially go back to the 1950s– both socially and technologically! whoo hooo!

Posted by: pat | September 2, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

apparently pat thinks the next president should be bill gates… or al gore… lol great point….

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

FYI…
im a second person that watched the RNC.. dont like it, but whats the alternative?!

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

Obama is thinking about going back to the temple of doom in Denver and giving another speech. Sorry Barry your time is up.

Posted by: jack | September 2, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

im a young conservative… and i party like barack obama, i mean a rock star!!!!

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Obama is thinking about going back to the temple of doom in Denver and giving another speech. Sorry Barry your time is up.
Posted by: jack
At least he could get people to show up and actually fill that stadium! Those Republican clowns couldn’t even fill that arena.

Posted by: gabby | September 2, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

funny how theresa makes it seem like a good convention is decided by the music…. hmmmm, sounds like an obama drone to me!!!!

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

if my 72 year old father embraces email and the internet, it makes me wonder why mccain is so resistant to modern technology. i see this as pretty relevant if a potential president brags that he is reluctant to “new fangled” communications that the entire world uses. perhaps he would rather use morse code or smoke signals like in the good ole days.

Posted by: pat | September 2, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

mike, thats simply not true, but i have a question for you… how come obamas numbers havent moved anything more than a normal jump after a convention? if he is the guy you lefties try to make it seem like he is, wouldnt he have a commanding lead? just something to chew on… stay real, dont make things up..

Posted by: tim | September 3, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Obama is WELL ahead. You Republicans are weird. Whenever he’s in the lead you say “How come he’s not MORE in the lead”?

Posted by: Walter Lee | September 3, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

man i cant wait to come in here the night of and the days after the election results to hear all the lefts excuses or conspiracies…

Posted by: tim | September 3, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

funny how theresa makes it seem like a good convention is decided by the music…. hmmmm, sounds like an obama drone to me!!!!
Posted by: tim
Music should be inspiring. This was more like a funeral procession! zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by: tippy | September 3, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

You nailed it Dell.
Hardly a mention of the last 8 years and all the great things that have happened.
Guess even Republicans can’t fake pride over that mess

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

all im saying is, if the last eight years have been soooo bad, and its all the republicans faults, then why is it so close? obama should be winning by a landslide. its because liberalism is dangerous. and although there are things to fix, most americans know socialism isnt the answer.

Posted by: tim | September 3, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

tippy…
you’re falling for their game. very sad.

Posted by: tim | September 3, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

This was all about America’s exceptionalism-we are a great country-not the one Dem’s think we are. Cindy McCain is an outstanding person, adopting a little girl from Bengaladesh with a cleft pallette. How come we don’t here about this-Oh I forgot-MSM won’t cover it.

Posted by: mike | September 3, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Why is it so close? Lots of reasons, but the main one is that Change scares a lot of people. We tend to like what we know over what we don’t. McCain is well known and we can be reasonably sure that we’ll survive the next 4 years under his administration just like we survived the last 8.
And of course, as the exit polls showed during the primaries, race does matter with a not insignificant portion of the population.

Posted by: johnTX | September 3, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

ryan c…
then dont vote for them…

Posted by: tim | September 3, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

“all im saying is, if the last eight years have been soooo bad, and its all the republicans faults, then why is it so close? obama should be winning by a landslide”
Obama is up 6 points and climbing.
As the Palin fiasco continue to unfold, that will climb much faster.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

I am a republican who has been frustrated by many things in this party. Like losing our commitment to a small government that gets off our back. You can’t just lower taxes without shrinking the budget, that causes deficits! I have been frustrated by the partisan rancor. Lobbyist influence ticks me off. I have been frustrated by many of the things Lieberman hit on tonight. I can see why Lieberman crushed Ned Lamont for the senate seat. He actually bothers to identify the problem with the system – partisanship, lobbyists, and greed – which upsets those entrenched in that system. Like McCain, Lieberman is an actual thinking human being rather than the embodiment of an agenda or political party. Congress approval rating is so low because they don’t solve problems. They just argue about them. Kudos to Joe Lieberman.

Posted by: HawkTheSlayer | September 3, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

“then dont vote for them… ”
Thanks for the sage advice.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

This was all about America’s exceptionalism-we are a great country-not the one Dem’s think we are. Cindy McCain is an outstanding person, adopting a little girl from Bengaladesh with a cleft pallette. How come we don’t here about this-Oh I forgot-MSM won’t cover it.
…………………………………
I don’t think Cindy McCain wants it brought up too much because her first story was that Mother Teresa herself asked her to adopt the child. They was found to be a lie, so she likes to keep the adoption story low key. She did adopt the baby from an orphanage run by Mother Teresa but she never meet Mother Teresa like she claimed.

Posted by: Brady | September 3, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

OK who thinks Lieberman just intro’d himself for a vote tomorrow as Palin steps down?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

hawk…
well said. i couldnt agree more on the issues that WE THE PEOPLE need to keep on the republicans about. its all about pressure. if american people dont put pressure on them to do what we want, the will simply do what they please.

Posted by: tim | September 3, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

i personally hope ted nugent gets palins spot… man that would be great.

Posted by: tim | September 3, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Hey Jock59801, if you hate Lieberman so much, why doesn’t the democratic party reject him? Oh yes, because he gave you that one crucial vote that gives you a majority in the Senate. Without him, republicans would control the Senate, and all committees. You see, Lieberman did not promise to support a “whoever” political candidate. The dems had no idea who they would select as president. Lieberman said he would caucus with the dems. And he kept that promise despite the lies and poison thrown his way. People like you should be appreciative instead of lying. You are lucky to have him in your party, and you are lucky to have had control of the senate for 2 years.

Posted by: HawkTheSlayer | September 3, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

If I were a Republican I would point out that its fair to say that Lieberman represents a failure of the Democratic Party process. We actually selected this guy to run for VP in the 2000 election. What a debacle that would have been if he had been elected. It doesn’t speak too well for the judgment of the Democratic Party. But we also reaffirmed this bad judgment with the rejection of Hillary Clinton. God will have finally blessed America when the Democratic Party gets its head screwed on straight enough to elect another Democrat.
I would point out, though, that Lieberman was able to get Republicans to applaud some of Bill Clinton’s accomplishments. That was rather phenomenal. I still don’t like the guy, though. He’s an absolute sellout.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 3, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Ryan C,
Team Obama just got hit by two three-pointers tonight so he’s lost that six point spread already. Stop the gloating already. I’m willing to bet any Democrats that were watching when Thompson described 1/1000th of the excruciating experience that McCain went through got tears in their eyes, even if they are not going to vote for the guy. This kind of story will definitely get the indies pumped and moving in McCain’s direction.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 3, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

You mean as Thompson’s coughed and wheezed his way what shoould have been a great story about McCain then told jokes that fell flat becuase he has bad timing.
You’re looking for a poll bounce from that?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

my take, if you don’t like mccain don’t vote for him.
i really doubt that the mccain camp is counting on or courting your vote.
as far as sarah i look forawd to 2012
hillary verus sarah-the year of the woman. i realize allot if you would like to see sarah chained to the kitchen sink-but the truth is her party loves her.

Posted by: mae g | September 3, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

pat that’s because Bush & Rove didn’t do that.

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

RyanC,
I’m not looking for a poll bounce or hoping for a poll bounce. I simply predict an immediate poll reversal, based on what I heard, and based on history. Although I’m planning to vote for Obama at this point I’m not bothered by a McCain ticket and if its a close fight I’ll more than enjoy it. If I’m wrong about my prediction there’s no grief on my part.
The power of emotional story telling moves people at a core level. Thompson was able to get people moved, despite the stacatto style and bumbling.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 3, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

What’s wrong with Independent Joe winning over independents?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 3, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

thank you joe for putting country before party…that takes courage. and at great political risk to himself, wow. it is no wonder joe and mccain are great friends.

Posted by: mae g | September 3, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

I know the pundits dismissed Lieberman and felt he wouldn’t have an impact
on those of us who’ve voted predominantly Democrat our whole lives, but in this election find ourselves on the fence. I agree that many Democrats will not even get to watching Lieberman and for many Democrats issues like abortion or potential Supreme Court nominees will deter them from crossing that line regardless of anything a Lieberman can say. I agree with Ted’s response to Lieberman. I felt he (Lieberman) spoke to my concerns tonight and said the things I needed to hear. I consider the past 8 yrs of Bush a total disaster and do not want to return to 4 more yrs of such. I consider the last 4 yrs of a Democratic Congress under Pelosi, Reid and company a disaster and have as much disdain for the likes of Reid and Pelosi as I do the Bush administration (at least close). Lieberman acknowledged that and spoke to that in that we have a reason to be unhappy as a result of these past 8 years and to not want to go there again. I am strongly liberal on social issues and abhor what the right wing of the Repub party stands for. I think Lieberman spoke to that. I have great admiration for McCain’s long record (before he even jumped into the race) of independence, willingness to take on special interests and his party and to take political risks for what he feels is right. I know, despite his pandering to get the nomination, that he is no George W. While I have voted predominantly Dem I have also voted Repub and 3rd party at times and while my positions fall in line with the Dems the majority of the time I tend to vote the person not the party. Having Lieberman, a Dem I’ve had alot of respect for (as I have Biden), who knows all the players in this race and Congress firsthand , who has seen first hand the work in the US Senate of both Obama and McCain – stand up there and vouch for McCain’s record and independence was important to me. What really hit a chord for me is his implication that while the power players of the Dem party will attack McCain and support their party’s candidate that they know the truth and that what Lieberman is saying is the truth. I watched Biden say he would be honored to run with or against McCain, Daschle who said that of course McCain voted along with Bush because that’s what all politicians (Dem or Repub) do to get elected, that Feingold said that while he supports Obama he doesn’t fear a McCain Presidency because McCain is really an independent and the knowledge that McCain has strong friendships with the Clintons, Kennedy, Kerry, Dodd, Daschle, Biden and so on- I don’t believe for one second any of these Dem power players fear a McCain Presidency
and just as McCain didn’t vote for Bush I believe there’s a strong probability the Clintons won’t be voting for Obama.
Lieberman struck all the right chords for this Independent.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Lieberman is for Lieberman. He speaks at the convention because he is disloyal and wrongheaded. For him, the only issue is Iraq…all the things that have been wrong for the last 8 years don’t matter to him…only Iraq which is still a disaster, surge included, draining our country of its treasure.

Posted by: Two-cats | September 3, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Great job, Joe. I got what you said too!

Posted by: Christie | September 3, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

Okay … Lieberman was right on! … wake up Reagan Democrats .. wise up Clinton Democrats … if this empty suit Obama is elected Democrats will totally lose their credibility!
McCain ’08
Hillary 2012!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | September 3, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Anybody actually interested in working together? If a former Democrat VP candidate can address the floor of the Republican National Convention and get applause for Bill Clinton, maybe this is the campaign that can knock down some walls. McCain has reached across the aisle, a lot, as we all know. So much that party loyalists haven’t trusted him for years. I think he is a guy who really can and will work with both sides for the good of our country.

Posted by: CraigF | September 3, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

The Washington Post just broke a story that McCains vetting of Palin was on Wednesday, she was announced on Friday.
And no one knew about the daughters pregnancy after they said they knew.

Posted by: Oh Oh | September 3, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

You’re right Sluggo, Republicans send their children to expensive Business/Law schools like Harvard and Yale (or both), Set them up with loans to start an oil company or buy a baseball team(or both) and then, when it fails, bankroll their political career so they can fail on a national level using the money of taxpayers to get a hefty return on their initial poor investment.
“Democrats love candidates who have never done anything, can’t run a business and never had an economics course.”

Posted by: Alan | September 3, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

Alan
Obama got a free ride no matter what the official record says…. you extreme left people have gone way over the top in opposing palin….the CLinton people will have the last laugh in 2012 and Obama will be a laughing stock!

Posted by: staniam | September 3, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

I was not for Obama in the beginning but the more I see of McCain, the faster I find myself supporting Obama and admiring him. McCain has sold his soul to win the presidency and he hasn’t even passed the first test…selecting a running mate. He picks someone who appeals to the Christian right rather than what is good for the country. Palin’s personal life, her ethics problems, her association with a secessionist group in Alaska, her mischaracterizations which are coming to light about the bridge to nowhere should have counted for something with McCain. She is not presidential material but McCain selected her for selfish reasons rather than thinking about the good of the country. Shame on him!

Posted by: Two-cats | September 3, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Re: stood up to some of those same Democratic interest groups and worked with Republicans to get important things done like welfare reform, free trade agreements, and a balanced budget.”
Clinton did that and deserved the applause.

Posted by: Christie | September 3, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Palin just got her first passport in 2007. she hasn’t even been to Russia (which is only 2.5 miles away from alaska). how can Palin handle intricate foreign policy when she’s only left the country once (as part of her gubernatorial duties). how can she be trusted to deal with the likes of Putin or Amadinejhad?
she doesn’t even know what a VP does.
i’m honestly surprised mccain would be this reckless with his choice.

Posted by: pat | September 3, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

HEY PALIN FANS!!
We don’t need any more thugs in the white house, even if they are pretty and wear a dress…
Palin’s Management Style is to Bully and Demand Political Loyalty. Palin’s tenure as mayor of Wasilla was marred by tremendous staff turnover, first when she fired most of the top staff — including the city’s librarian — because she questioned their loyalty, and then later when staff quit because of her micromanaging style.
Wasilla even lost the opportunity to hire a police chief because he said the job seemed too political.
Imagine what she could do if she had real power?? Scary….

Posted by: Davis | September 3, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

LOL, sorry Jake, but I’m having this cute visual of you playing the piano in your 5th grade, then standing up for the applause.
Great article though. I totally agree with you.

Posted by: Kimberly | September 3, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Pat Palin’s been to Ireland, Germany and Kuwait. She’s only been Governor as long as Tim Kaine, who was rumored to be Obama’s first choice but he needed foreign policy experise on his ticket to compensate for his lack of,
so I doubt she’s done alot of traveling as Governor yet. If we’re going to base it on travel though then Biden should be at the top of the Dem ticket and McCain is in the right spot on the ticket. Obama hasn’t traveled as much as those two and he’s the top of the ticket. I realize his supporters fluff his overseas travel by including growing up in Indonesia under the age of 12 and a college trip to Pakistan- which is great, but doesn’t qualify for foreign policy experience. I mean we are talking about the same guy who just got shamed into making a trip to Iraq aren’t we?

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

For all of the Hillary ’12/McCain Voters. What do you think ’12 is going to look like after four more years of Iraq?
48 Months @ $12.3 Billion/Month = $590B.
More than another half Trillion in debt to China at what interest rate?
Hell, McCain is going to have to cancel ALL taxes to pay for that. It’s the only thing that makes sense

Posted by: Carl | September 3, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

Davis Yeah, we need to keep putting the same old partisan politics back into office. At least she could stick up to her party, when has Obama? So if you like business as usual I’d keep electing business usual.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Carl But you seem to forget that Obama is going to march us right over from Iraq into Afghanistan to continue George W’s war on terror. What, are we getting a discount or something on military costs over in Afghanistan.
These troops aren’t coming home they’re just veering off the path a little.
And yet on the domestic front we’re going to implement this program and that program and universal health care and on and on. Of course, I’m not too concerned about it though because I’ve been around long enough to know that if Obama gets one thing out of the laundry list of things he promised (which was the same liberal promises made every 4 years) then he’ll have accomplished something.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Did he really say “What you can expect from John McCain as President is precisely what he has done this week”? Jeez, I bet that line was put in before Palingate, LOL.

Posted by: Reality-based | September 3, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Lieberman was wacky. When he compared Clinton’s presidential record with Obama who isn’t the president yet? What was that all about? AND THEY CLAPPED like they were coached?? Very strange.
As an African-America I can say I do find it strange that a party that was preaching inclusion- tonight could not match their rhetoric with a visual representing inclusion in the convention. I counted 1,2,3 maybe 4 African American faces and a few Asians. Something is wrong with that picture. The Republicans need to practice what they preach. To say you are putting “COUNTRY FIRST” and your delegates are monolithic in their appearance is quite contrary to your message. The American population is a microcosm of the world. The Democratic party represents the diverse county of immigrants,the generational offspring of African slaves and Native Americans. What does the Republican party demographic represent- not modern day America. Watching that gathering tonight is like viewing America through a time warp. It is very scary.

Posted by: clarity | September 3, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

alpaig,
the fact that palin has no curiosity in her 44 years to travel outside of Alaska (except when forced) says it all to me. not worldly = fundamentally not equipped to deal with the world… just like our current president when he first got in…
this ticket is McSame to me

Posted by: pat | September 3, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Stanian,
I don’t remember mentioning Palin. You must have hit the wrong Republican response macro. Try another random key, I’m sure it will make just as much sense.

Posted by: Alan | September 3, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

Lieberman brought defeat to
the Dems in 2000.
Republicans can keep this
old namby-pamby loser – for
their defeat is only two
months away.

Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

John McCain is now vetting Sarah Palin. Do you want John McCain so careless with a major decision to be president?

Posted by: voteO | September 3, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

“At least she could stick up to her party, when has Obama?”
When was that? when she dropped longtime politcal ally Ted Stevens when he became radioactive (indicted) or when she canceled the bridge to nowhere (after endorsing it a year earlier) only to keep the earmark money for other things.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Ryan You didn’t answer the question.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Palin is charging Alaska for her private attorney.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am

alpaig: “At least she could stick up to her party”
She could. But she didn’t.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

Lieberman is lower than scum. Al Gore’s Biggest Mistake Ever.

Posted by: Whatman | September 3, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

alpaig52: “Palin’s been to Ireland, Germany and Kuwait”
Bwahahaha. First, she visited American military bases, that’s hardly visiting a country and drinking tea with the locals. And second, Ireland was a stop-over, for fuel.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Leiberman is a hypocrite, during his speech he accused Obama of voting against a bill funding for the troops, which he did not, that bill had more to it than just funding for the troops, and the funniest part is Leiberman voted against that same bill.
LEIBERMAN AND THE REPUBLICANS ARE HYPOCRITES!

Posted by: Kathy | September 3, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Beth: ‘Kate, you need your eyes checked because I see a very diverse crowd of young and old.’
Awe. What do you consider young? 55?
I saw the same as Kate: a bunch of old white people. The only people who were young were their home-schooled children. And they are old by nature.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Pretty much tonight’s convention message to the American people:
*OBAMA IS A WUSS WITH NO EXPERIENCE.
*MCCAIN IS AN AMERICAN HERO READY TO LEAD

Posted by: Tim | September 3, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Fred Thompson was on fire tonight.
He pretty much sliced & diced the junior Senator Obama and tossed him in the garbage.

Posted by: casey | September 3, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Thompson told the crowd that McCain had been a POW.
Gosh. You learn something new every day.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

Pat I respect your opinion on that but I don’t really see what the big deal is with Palin in a VP slot when Obama’s at the top of the ticket. Both the Dems and the Repubs have their bright, shining and upcoming stars,
Obama being one of the Dems and Palin and Jindal being two examples on the Repub side. The Dems have opted to put their bright new talent on the top of their ticket and McCain has opted to put one of their new talent in the VP slot. Tim Kaine was on the City Council, Mayor, Lt Governor and a Governor for as long as Palin and I really don’t believe for one second we would see the outcry we are seeing about Palin if Obama had chosen him. People may have questioned why Obama didn’t put someone with more foreign policy experience on the ticket to compensate for his lack of but we certainly wouldn’t be negating what experience he has in the manner we are Palin and certainly not question how could have children and still be VP.
Carter, Reagan, Clinton and Bush Jr all came on as ex-Governors with minimal if any foreign policy experience. In fact the only recent President who came on with such is George Sr. People discount Alaska because of it’s small population but I hear no one mentioning Biden’s representation of Delaware, a State that has only about 200,000 more people then in Alaska. I think years of experience while important in the long run mean little if your experience has nothing to show for it. Obama has not completed his first term in the Senate and has spent all but 143 days campaigning for the Presidency. He has one of the worst records for not showing up to vote (in comparison to Clinton who was also running and yet made 92% of her votes), never held one meeting during his stewardship of the foreign relations committee until just very recently- he might have not as well even shown up because he obviously (like Edwards whose experience was even slimmer then Palins and Kaines) just walked in the door to use the US Senate as a springboard to a Presidential run.
I’ll take almost 3 yrs of Governing from either Palin or Kaine before Obama’s 143 days productive days in the US Senate. I’ve been a community organizer and while a noble position to say that job is more relevent then City Council or Mayor is a joke. Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors, I think McCain can round up a couple hundred for Palin. Obama has pointed out to us over and over again that judgement, not experience, it what’s important. In fact the Obama camp doesn’t want an arguement on the experience issue in regards to Palin’s presence on the scene now, rather they’re spinning the judgement angle. I personally would have rather seen Ridge or Lieberman on the ticket but clearly if they wanted to keep the GOP base that wasn’t going to happen but I don’t think everything we know about McCain and the value he would place on someone like Palin who is probably more libertarian then GOP, comes as such a shock. I listened to Palin on CNBC talking about drilling and ANWAR (of which I’m not on board for) and found her impressive, intelligent, fresh (she made Obama sound like an entrenched old politics
politician replaying the same old rhetoric of the DFL) and had me almost convinced we should drill in ANWAR. She may get up there tomorrow and choke or say some gaffe in the near future or something bigger then what they’ve thrown out of the kitchen sink already, may come out but all the arguements to date are pretty lame, sexist, classist
and elitist. Personally, I don’t think we need one more lawyer in politics from Harvard. If we want a new and fresh perspective and change in this Country then some of our future politicians may end up running with less experience then our traditional picks and with more non-traditional backgrounds. Someone doesn’t have to agree with her or chose to vote for her but she should at least be given a chance to pass/fail on her own rather then stories about DUI’s going back 20 yrs and teenage pregnancy. I come from a State where our Governor was an ex-professional wrestler and I think one of our best Senators Paul Wellstone, who Obama couldn’t hold a candle too, was a teacher. He was rooted in the people and his politics showed that.
You know, Axelrod has spent alot of energy and strategizing and implementing events and press over the course of 18 months attempting to convince this Country that Obama’s Presidential and that his minimal record of accomplishments be swept under the rug, and he has done a great job of that obviously. I think if Axelrod took on Palin he could have us convinced she’s Presidential material pretty quickly also. The Obama camp wants her out of this race and they are at the bottom of the sink being thrown at this women and while Obama can eloquently denounce throwing children into the mix clearly his camp has no problem putting it out there and stirring the pot. I expect Rove type attacks and politics from the GOP but I expected better from the DFL.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

Senator Ted Stevens, isn’t he under indictment for corruption?
“Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin began building clout in her state’s political circles in part by serving as a director of an independent political group organized by the now embattled Alaska Senator Ted Stevens,” Matthew Mosk reports in The Washington Post.
“Palin’s name is listed on 2003 incorporation papers of the ‘Ted Stevens Excellence in Public Service, Inc., a 527 group that could raise unlimited funds from corporate donors.”
Palin the gift that Keeps on Giving!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 3, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Kathy They’re all hypocrites . It’s all the same old politics. I don’t know how Obama can attack McCain on the vote on Iraq when Biden made the same vote and also supported in increase in troops right alongside McCain. The Dems saying McCain doesn’t support veterans because he didn’t support Webb’s GI Bill is misleading. McCain opposed it out of concerns about retainment and most importantly he wanted to see education benefits for military personnel be able to be transferred to their children (something the troops want, to pass those benefits to their kids to pay for their college) and the final bill ended up including it. And also, the Dems sat on that bill for almost two years and didn’t pull it out until the election cycle until it was politically expedient. In fairness to the DFL, the same holds true for when they oppose bills on the base of things that have been added to the bill or the wording and then the GOP comes out and says they don’t support senior citizens or some such thing. It’s just the same old politics and your candidate engages in it and is just as much a part of it as everyone else.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Ryan Your information is not accurate.
Hillary has a voting record in the 90 percentile and McCain and Obama are almost identical with Obama being just slightly lower then McCain. McCain has been in the Senate for almost 30 years and that voting record does not entail those whole 30 years and McCain has been campaigning as long as Obama. For a first term Senator that record of Obama’s is abysmal.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 3, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

From Mike Doogan, Alaska:
“Palin’s time as governor has been a mixed bag. She deserves high marks for moving the possibility of a gas pipeline forward. But most of the work on [raising] oil taxes was done by the legislature. Ditto with ethics reform. And her role in killing the ballyhooed “Bridge to Nowhere”? Turns out that she was for it before she was against it, and that, well, she kept the money anyway.
Add to this a growing sense that the state government isn’t running all that well: commissioners and key staffers jumping or being pushed. The operating budget growing 10 percent a year. Policy problems such as high energy costs being papered over with cash giveaways. The governor and her aides being investigated by the legislature. You can see why it’s not clear she’s a competent governor of Alaska, let alone qualified to take over the reins of the national government.”

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

Hillary has a voting record in the 90 percentile and McCain and Obama are almost identical with Obama being just slightly lower then McCain.”
You can check the Wap Congress votes database.
Look up the 109th Session of Congress than the 110th Session.
In the 109th Obama missed only 11 votes.
Hillary missed 16 votes.
McCain missed 56 votes.
Obama has missed 45.5% votes of the current Congress (110th session)
Hillary has missed 32.2% of the votes.
McCain has missed 63.8% of the votes this year. Campaign first, country second.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

The Dems saying McCain doesn’t support veterans because he didn’t support Webb’s GI Bill is misleading. McCain opposed it out of concerns about retainment”
Yes, because soldiers bettering themselves from college could decide McCain policy of endless war may not work for them and no reenlist.
The McCain solution?
Stop improvement of one of the greatest social class moving policies in the modern era.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:58 am 2:58 am

Silly Republicans!!!
Even if this sorts itself out, there’s still the fact of the pregnancy itself: “The revelation focused attention on the Republican Party’s call, in the party platform adopted today, for unwed teenagers to abstain from sex,” Michael Kranish reports in The Boston Globe.
“In a story heavy with cultural overtones, Palin’s daughter became both the talk of the GOP convention and the latest episode in the national discussion about teen pregnancy.”
Lynn Sweet, of the Chicago Sun-Times: “I’m trying to connect the dots here. . . . Unmarried teen five months pregnant, will marry father. . . . She’s the daughter of the GOP vice presidential nominee, the little-known Alaska governor, at the center of a controversy over a fired Alaskan state trooper. . . . Republicans at their convention Monday adopt platform calling for increased funding for abstinence education.”
Palin the gift that doesn’t stop giving!!

Posted by: Davis | September 3, 2008, 3:04 am 3:04 am

I’m ex-democrat[Hillary supporter]
voting republican this year….
McCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: NICHOLAS | September 3, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

Julian;
That would be true IF more democrats are elected to Congress. As it stands now, the Freakin’ Republican have been filibustering bills left and right! Lieberman was the tipping point, and he hasn’t always voted with the Dems. The Dems have put out some really great bills for healthcare, energy and new jobs. One of the energy bills would have passed if McCain wasn’t sitting it out in his office, as stated by Senator Insley of Washington state.

Posted by: Teri | September 3, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Everybody thinks that you need 60 votes in the Senate to get a Bill passed.
Wrong. It’s a majority of the vote, at the most 51. It has ‘become’ 60 in this particular Senate because the Republicans have filibustered every meaningful Bill. The number of filibusters is twice as high in the last two sessions from previous ones.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 3, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

McCain is a coward, not a hero.
The former POW chickened out and
canceled a scheduled appearance
on Larry King Live.
The reason? The previous night
on CNN’s Election Center one of
his campaign spokesmen was asked
to name a single decision
Sarah Palin had made as Commander
in Chief of the Alaska National
Guard.
He could not name anything. He
was asked the same question
several times. He had nothing
to say. Zip.
McCain said CNN went too far.
And canceled his appearance.

Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 3:34 am 3:34 am

Ha ha I was thinking about that last point Jake made as well. And isn’t one of McCain’s sons a John as well- that makes 4 John McCains. (And maybe I am getting this wrong, but should an Orthodox Jew be invoking God’s name at all anyway?)
I wasn’t impressed with Lieberman at all to be honest. I thought Fred Thompson sold John McCain much better. And I don’t know how popular Joe Lieberman is with anyone right now. Maybe a few folks in the middle, but I think the Democratic Party is pretty mad at him, and I am not sure the GOP has ever warmed to him, except maybe in a schadenfreunde kind of way. He’s certainly no Zell Miller.

Posted by: markymark | September 3, 2008, 6:22 am 6:22 am

I’m not sure why some folks on this blog thread feel that Obama has all the answers. His good ole friends (Pelosi, Harry Reid, Kerry, Kennedy and etc) have had free rein of Congress for the last 2 years and have accomplished very little. No wonder they handpicked Obama for the throne. I have no doubt in McCain’s leadership.

Posted by: sue | September 3, 2008, 7:03 am 7:03 am

If so much is at stake for this country, why on earth did DNC nominate a very unqualified person for presidential nominee. We would not put a medical intern in charge of a hospital. If there are questions about McCain/Palin ticket, it pales in comparison to Obama/Biden.

Posted by: sue | September 3, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

The democrat party has become an embarrassment. Thank-you Joe Lieberman for pointing that out. I hope this causes the dems to get their act together. Maybe I’ll come back when they get rid of Pelosi and Dean.

Posted by: Greg | September 3, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

To all those here criticizing Barack Obama’s alleged lack of experience, tell me something:
What exactly has John McCain accomplished in his 26 years in office?

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Greg,
Just to let you know, t’s the “Democratic” party, not the “democrat” party.
As for Lieberman becoming an Independant,, he did so because he would have lost his Senate seat running as a Democrat.
We Democrats say good riddance. You too will soon find out that the only allegiance Joe Lieberman has is to Joe Lieberman.

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Another Sarah,
Had McCain pick a woman based solely on her merits, I would have congratulated him for doing so.
But he didn’t choose Palin based o0n her merits.
He chose Palin out of desperation hoping to stop Obama’s momentum and to excite his base.
Many women feel insulted by McCain’s choice not so much because of who he picked, but because of the reason he picked her.

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

The biggest question is WHY has she NOT spoken to the press? 6 days as the VP Nom and not ONE interview??? What is up with that? Has that ever happened before? It shows she is not ready. If she can’t handle a simple interview, how can she be ready to lead the Nation????

Posted by: Jeanne from Michigan | September 3, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

I have no sympathy for Palin
or her family. My sympathies
go to the families of bears
and moose she’s been trophy
hunting and killing for sport.

Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

“Clinton did that and deserved the applause.”
The same Clinton who is branded a raicst by Obama and his surrogates.

Posted by: geevill | September 3, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

What one has to realize is that these people in the RNC (excluding Paul delegates) are sheep being led to the slaughter and will clap at just about anything. If you want to see an intelligent crowd reacting to cerebral speeches watch clips of the Paul rally.

Posted by: Ben Straub | September 3, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Well, if Bush endorses him that’s good enough for me. Nothing like getting the thumbs up from the worst president since Buchanan.

Posted by: kate | September 3, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Love all the so-called “Hillary” supporters voting Mccain. (yea right.) You must totally agree with Mccain’s campaign manager as he stated yesterday this election is NOT about the issues.

Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Charles Schumer, senior Senator NY
“I like Joe Lieberman, but that’s a big mistake for him,” Schumer said. “To be pro-war and to have his views on the issues, everyone respects that. But you don’t go over to the other side.”
PUMA
never question just follow

Posted by: shunkan | September 3, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Here is my question to you: Should the 18 yr old kid that got Gov. Palin underage daughter pregnant be charged, with a crime like other teens in this Country? There are teens in this Country currently serving jail time, for commenting the same offense of having sex with an underage minor that this kid is being accused of. Why isn’t the law being followed in this case? Is there a double standard for a VP candidate?

Posted by: DAN | September 3, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Jake
I think that some journalists just don’t understand that both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party are bigger than the insiders and pundits that are now trying to take control of our country.
Most Republicans want a reformer..and even the insiders voted for McCain-Feingold.
Remember this ,,,,Democratic insiders are pro-abortion most Americans are against it.
I don’t like Bush and I never voted for him. But I really dislike that the mainstream media seems to be running their own candidate this year.
Case in point…the Rezko investigation continues and the media ignores it. Obama is up to his eyeballs in the “pay for play” Chicago scandal…I have read more about the Palin ethics investigation than the criminal investigation in Chicago.

Posted by: Jackie | September 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

I respect Lieberman, because he is a Democrat of old, JFK and FDR style, he is not part of this George Soros controlled Modern day Democrat party. And for that he was kicked out, I guess the modern day dems/libs do not believe in individual opinion and free speech! the man voted 95% of the time with the libs but that was not good enough – Keep that in mind Conservative states the Dems running in you are are not conservative they are libs!
We support McCain because the alternative is too dangerous far more then anyone realizes!!

Posted by: spock | September 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

McCain despite his age is
half-baked to deal with
national security.
Expect wars in Georgia,
Ukraine and other places.
Expect deteriorating relations
with Russia. Oil imports will
increase making us even more
dependent on the Middle East.
And he will wreck the economy.

Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Remember Judas?? Anyone who ever believed that Lieberman was a democrat had been wearing blinkers. All CT voters who supported him must be having buyer’s remorse. Go back to history, and try to understand why Israel has not been able to secure their own territory and live in peace. It is such like Lieberman who had betrayed their own people, bit the hands that fed them and will remain an outcast for the rest of their lives. People without loyalty are just not traitors, they bring eternal grief to those that follow them.

Posted by: Karen | September 3, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

To all those here criticizing Barack Obama’s alleged lack of experience, tell me something:
What exactly has John McCain accomplished in his 26 years in office?
******************************
I tried to compile just that, but couldn’t
find anything that went passed the senate
without getting squashed.

Posted by: spacerook1 | September 3, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Republicans not only allow Joe Lieberman to speak at the GOP convention, but cheer? My how my party has lost its way…who are these imposters? What has happened? Why is John McCain the GOP candidate? Who in the world is Sarah Palin?

Posted by: The Wrench | September 3, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Republicans not only allow Joe Lieberman to speak at the GOP convention, but cheer? My how my party has lost its way…who are these imposters? What has happened? Why is John McCain the GOP candidate? Who in the world is Sarah Palin?

Posted by: The Wrench | September 3, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am

In my book, it’s a free country. Lieberman can back whomever he likes. But c’mon, Joe, you can do better than old Republican tricks like saying that Obama voted against money for our troops in Iraq. Obama supports our soldiers, and you know it. That vote was a symbolic protest of this unnecessary war, in which thousands of soldiers have died for a bunch of lying Republicans.

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Did you see the camera operators trying to find minorities in the audience? Now that was a tough job!

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

I think Lieberman is the most honest in DC. He stuck it to the Democraps when they denounced him and ran as an independent and beat them. No wonder they are upset…..
You guys out there only seeing “old people” must remember that these folks have forgotten more than you will ever know. Seems that when you reach a certain age you get smarter. Go McCain/Palin.
Heard a reporter this AM saying that “Palin just might put Pelosi in the time-out chair”. Being a mom of 5 sounds like she might just be able to handle all the children we have elected in Washington.

Posted by: MEW | September 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Lieberman’s speech was surreal, and the audience’s reaction was even more so! For the duration of the speech, I felt that I was watching a rerun of the Dem convention!

Posted by: chuck | September 3, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Did anyone get a load of the crowd at this convention it looks like they emptied every nursing home this side of Florida to attend. I did not see any youth in that crowd of old fogies.

Posted by: ronnieraygun | September 3, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

BIG DEAL one Democract endorses another! Where is the story?

Posted by: argh! | September 3, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Ronnie forget the crowd.
Have you ever seen a party convention that is basically and indictment of their own party?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

“Did you see the camera operators trying to find minorities in the audience? Now that was a tough job!”
They showed the black delegate. He had one of those great campaign hats on.
They did not linger on McCain’s daughter at all, barely showing her in family shots.
Must have been new McCain adviser Eschew’s advice.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Happy to see you all paying such attention to the RNC! Wonderful party, uh – not just a Hollywood, rock-star affair! You all sound so scared! WOW!!

Posted by: Beckie | September 3, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

ronnieraygun:
Have you looked at your VP candidate lately? Hum, how old is he?

Posted by: MEW | September 3, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Lieberman was an embarassment even as the Democratic VP canidate–he isn’t going to help the GOP. His 90% record
of voting with Bush pales in comparison to his 100% toeing the line with AIPAC. The man is simply so Zionist he can’t stand the risk of a man with common sense possibly running American foreign policy.

Posted by: Paul | September 3, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Lieberman is such an idiot … so are all the people that would vote for McCain who call themselves dems. If Obama loses it may be time to start a new party.

Posted by: Fenbi | September 3, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

You must not have been watching ABC, Jake. They cut over to commentators during the middle of the speech! They didn’t do that during Hillary’s Tuesday night keynote, did they? Please explain whether or not this is media bias in a separate post.

Posted by: Steve | September 5, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.