McCain and His Campaign Blame Obama and Democrats for Bailout Bill’s Death, McCain Says Now Is Not the Time to Affix Blame
In Des Moines, Iowa, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said the following: "Senator Obama and his allies in Congress infused unnecessary partisanship into the process. Now is not the time to affix the blame. It’s time to fix the problem. "
Um…isn’t that affixing blame?
And less than two hours before those McCain remarks, senior policy adviser Doug Holtz-Eakin issued this statement:
“From the minute John McCain suspended his campaign and arrived in Washington to address this crisis, he was attacked by the Democratic leadership: Senators Obama and Reid, Speaker Pelosi and others," Holtz-Eakin said. "Their partisan attacks were an effort to gain political advantage during a national economic crisis. By doing so, they put at risk the homes, livelihoods and savings of millions of American families. Barack Obama failed to lead, phoned it in, attacked John McCain, and refused to even say if he supported the final bill. Just before the vote, when the outcome was still in doubt, Speaker Pelosi gave a strongly worded partisan speech and poisoned the outcome. This bill failed because Barack Obama and the Democrats put politics ahead of country.”
As long as we’re not affixing blame!
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Republicans voted down the bill because even they no longer trust Bush.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
McCain says his “suspension” was meant to help the country.
Critics say it was meant to help his campaign.
It now seems that he’s failed by either standard.
Posted by: reason | September 29, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
No Jake, it is called telling the truth.
I’m glad McCain gave Obama some straight talk today.
For days, Obama, Pelosi, et al, have been playing politics and pointing the finger. It was on full display when Pelosi strutted and cackled on the Floor of the House. What an idiot!
Now their game has been exposed. Yet Obama and Pelosi are still up to their old partisan political games.
Telling the truth: Something the MSM and Obama are complete failures in.
Posted by: USVet | September 29, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
McCain and his campaign believe he ought to have gotten credit for its passage.
McCain, today:
I put my campaign on hold for a couple days last week to fight for a rescue plan that put you and your economic security first. I fought for a plan that protected taxpayers, homeowners, consumers and small business owners.
I went to Washington last week to make sure that the taxpayers of Ohio and across this great country were not left footing the bill for mistakes made on Wall Street and in Washington.
Some people have criticized my decision, but I will never, ever be a president who sits on the sidelines when this country faces a crisis. Some of you may have noticed, but it’s not my style to simply “phone it in.”
And Steve Schmidt, McCain’s chief strategist, on Meet the Press:
“What Senator McCain was able to do was to help bring all of the parties to the table, including the House Republicans, whose votes were needed to pass this”
So if McCain wanted credit for passage, should he share the blame for its defeat? Or is a coward who only will take responsability for succes?
Two thirds of Republicans voted for its defeat…after a weekend of telephone call diplomacy from McCain.
Nancy Pelosi may have given a partisan speech, but she was able to get most of her Democrats on board.
Posted by: hands on deck | September 29, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
“It’s time to fix the problem.”
Sure John. Please just promise us that YOU won’t go back to D.C. and try to fix it again.
Posted by: BBpd | September 29, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
they voted down the bill because the democrats partisan rhetoric and trying to stuff 29% of the profits going to ACORN into the bill. Pelosi, Frank, and Reed were Politics first!!!! Buying votes with our money!!!
Posted by: zig | September 29, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
McCain lost today and he knows it.
So he’s fingerpointing at Obama who is a s Presidential as ever, telling America to stay calm till the deal is done. A wise man, Obama, versus an angry, erratic, lying and losing old fool.
Posted by: megan | September 29, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
The democratic congress put there butts on the line to save the American economy.. The economy that has been put in this messy shape by the Republican party!
Why should the democrats take reasponabilty for doing all the lifting when your party made the mess!
GIVE ME A BREAk! You position is stupid!
The Republican position is :
WELL WE WERE GOING TO PASS THIS BILL TO SAVE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY
BUT THEN PALOSI BLAMED US BECAUSE WE WHERE IN CHARGE FOR THE LAST 7.5 YEARS
SO SCREW SAVING AMERICA’S ECONOMY!
What a joke!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
This statement takes the cake.
McCain has clearly shown he does not have the temperment or credibility to be the leader of this nation.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
McCain is a shameless liar.
Posted by: JR | September 29, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
LOL just look at that old fool who today was claiming the credit for passing a bill that did not pass.
He’s not only out of touch with ordinary Americans, he’s out of touch with Washington and his own party as well.
Desperate and totally erratic, yes, these ware words for McCain these days.
But hey! He still got 7 houses!
He still got 13 cars!
So why should HE care?
Posted by: wittgenstein | September 29, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
is it me or is mccain all over the place on this?
Posted by: jim | September 29, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
“Now is not the time to fix blame. I am officially suspending the election and assuming the presidency. My opponents will shortly be rounded up into re-education camps.”
-Sen. McCain
Posted by: Tungsten | September 29, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Cultural Amnesia – Uh. I used to work in the music industry and was involved in copyright law a lot. I’ve worked with all the major labels including Warner. They have been pulling down content for almost a decade off of services and the process today is entirely automated.
There is no way this is political motivated.
Posted by: johnTX | September 29, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
bTW why didn’t Mccain suspend his campaign AGAIN?
Might be a great opportunity to give Palin a night off on Thursday instead to putting the USA to shame in her debate with Biden.
And Republicans badly need him in Washington to stay as divided and clueless as they are!
Posted by: wittgenstein | September 29, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
McCain cannot accept the fact that he failed and failed miserably.
He has never been and will never be a leader.. he is only a corrupt politician that steals ideas and points the finger at everyone but himself… he cannot think on his own.
When a crises arises.. his response is a knee-jerk… never thinks, and acts always out of desperation.
Great example is his choice of VP.
And now the bailout …. he tried to make it seem, that all this was his doing and he was the only one to save the day… but he never bothered to read Paulson’s 3 page plan.
If he is elected by the people, then they get exactly what they deserve.. a corrupt, inept, old man who cannot make decisions based on common sense.
The sad thing is, they will make us suffer through 4 more years of agony.
Posted by: l | September 29, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Hey USVet…I’m also a vet. McCain said Obama is to blame, then said this is not a time to blame…huh? It sounds like the Department of Redundancy Department has lost his memory. Either way, Obama is looking far more Presidential than McCane ever has. Obama says “calm down, let’s work this out.” McCain says “it’s your fault. I played politics and the country wasn’t sucker, so it we got to blame it on someone to turn my campaign around.
Posted by: algwriter | September 29, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
I think it’s ridiculous that both parties are playing the blame game! I believe Pelosi’s speech alienated some Republicans who then used the opportunity to attack the Dems. WAKE UP CONGRESS AND SAVE OUR COUNTRY BEFORE ITS TOO LATE. Time for term limits on ALL congressman so we can sweep out partisan politics!!
Posted by: Frank | September 29, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
This is why he’s losing ground in the polls. He’s out there blaming other instead of finding a solution.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 29, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
Dosn’t anybody here get it??
How the Democrats Created this Financial Crisis
A Look Back~
The financial crisis of the past year has provided a number of surprising twists and turns, and from Bear Stearns Cos. to American International Group Inc., ambiguity has been a big part of the story.
Why did Bear Stearns fail, and how does that relate to AIG? It all seems so complex.
But really, it isn’t. Enough cards on this table have been turned over that the story is now clear. The economic history books will describe this episode in simple and understandable terms: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac exploded, and many bystanders were injured in the blast, some fatally.
Fannie and Freddie did this by becoming a key enabler of the mortgage crisis. They fueled Wall Street’s efforts to securitize subprime loans by becoming the primary customer of all AAA-rated subprime-mortgage pools. In addition, they held an enormous portfolio of mortgages themselves.
In the times that Fannie and Freddie couldn’t make the market, they became the market. Over the years, it added up to an enormous obligation. As of last June, Fannie alone owned or guaranteed more than $388 billion in high-risk mortgage investments. Their large presence created an environment within which even mortgage-backed securities assembled by others could find a ready home.
The problem was that the trillions of dollars in play were only low-risk investments if real estate prices continued to rise. Once they began to fall, the entire house of cards came down with them.
Turning Point~
Take away Fannie and Freddie, or regulate them more wisely, and it’s hard to imagine how these highly liquid markets would ever have emerged. This whole mess would never have happened.
It is easy to identify the historical turning point that marked the beginning of the end.
Back in 2005, Fannie and Freddie were, after years of dominating Washington, on the ropes. They were enmeshed in accounting scandals that led to turnover at the top. At one telling moment in late 2004, captured in an article by my American Enterprise Institute colleague Peter Wallison, the Securities and Exchange Comiission’s chief accountant told disgraced Fannie Mae chief Franklin Raines that Fannie’s position on the relevant accounting issue was not even ….on the page” of allowable interpretations.
Then legislative momentum emerged for an attempt to create a ….world-class regulator” that would oversee the pair more like banks, imposing strict requirements on their ability to take excessive risks. Politicians who previously had associated themselves proudly with the two accounting miscreants were less eager to be associated with them. The time was ripe.
Greenspan’s Warning~
The clear gravity of the situation pushed the legislation forward. Some might say the current mess couldn’t be foreseen, yet in 2005 Alan Greenspan told Congress how urgent it was for it to act in the clearest possible terms: If Fannie and Freddie ….continue to grow, continue to have the low capital that they have, continue to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios, which they need to do for interest rate risk aversion, they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic risk down the road,” he said. ….We are placing the total financial system of the future at a substantial risk.”
What happened next was extraordinary. For the first time in history, a serious Fannie and Freddie reform bill was passed by the Senate Banking Committee. The bill gave a regulator power to crack down, and would have required the companies to eliminate their investments in risky assets.
Different World~
If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. In 2005, 2006 and 2007, a blizzard of terrible mortgage paper fluttered out of the Fannie and Freddie clouds, burying many of our oldest and most venerable institutions. Without their checkbooks keeping the market liquid and buying up excess supply, the market would likely have not existed.
But the bill didn’t become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn’t even get the Senate to vote on the matter.
That such a reckless political stand could have been taken by the Democrats was obscene even then. Wallison wrote at the time: ….It is a classic case of socializing the risk while privatizing the profit. The Democrats and the few Republicans who oppose portfolio limitations could not possibly do so if their constituents understood what they were doing.”
Mounds of Materials~
Now that the collapse has occurred, the roadblock built by Senate Democrats in 2005 is unforgivable. Many who opposed the bill doubtlessly did so for honorable reasons. Fannie and Freddie provided mounds of materials defending their practices. Perhaps some found their propaganda convincing.
But we now know that many of the senators who protected Fannie and Freddie, including Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Christopher Dodd, have received mind-boggling levels of financial support from them over the years.
Throughout his political career, Obama has gotten more than $125,000 in campaign contributions from employees and political action committees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, second only to Dodd, the Senate Banking Committee chairman, who received more than $165,000.
Clinton, the 12th-ranked recipient of Fannie and Freddie PAC and employee contributions, has received more than $75,000 from the two enterprises and their employees. The private profit found its way back to the senators who killed the fix.
There has been a lot of talk about who is to blame for this crisis. A look back at the story of 2005 makes the answer pretty clear.
Oh, and there is one little footnote to the story that’s worth keeping in mind while Democrats point fingers between now and Nov. 4: Senator John McCain was one of the three cosponsors of S.190, the bill that would have averted this mess!! He’s our man!
Posted by: MBH | September 29, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
jim
“Is it me or is mccain all over the place on this?”
No its not just you it everyone!
McCain is unfit to lead!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
facts are facts! Everyone, please read Stanley Kurtz’s article in the New York Post today, highlighting Obama’s deep involvement with ACORN, a corrupt organization, which literally forced banks and lenders to issue high risk loans….tons of them….leading to our current predicament! This plus Freddie and Fannie’s significant gifts to the Obama campaign…
Obama IS deeply involved in this, from the start. He deserves ALL the blame. How can you possibly support him, when he has now sacrified your families safety and security? How can you put your trust in this man? He is a filthy liar!
Does the media report on this? Nope. Do they report on Obama’s thug tactics sacrificing free speech in Missouri? No.
What has our country come to?
Posted by: liberati | September 29, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
MBH, I think for the Democrats to be at fault for failing to pass a bill in 2005, they would have had to be in power in 2005.
See, the Democrats actually became the majority in 2007.
Posted by: johnTX | September 29, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
No need to spin. 95 Democrats voted against this bill. They need 12 more votes to pass – you do the math. If the Democrats had all their ducks in a row thay can pass this without Republican su.
The Democrats are a laughing stock and the media supports the joke. The Barney and Dodd circus and the democrat support of ill fated mortgage policies preesure on banks was/is the problem. Guys like Dodd and Franks will do anything to get this passed to get their butts out of the fire. They are a disgrace. Hats off to Mccain who tried to help instead of that arrogant narciccistic (“I’m here if you need ME” -ugh!)poser you call a presidential candidate.
Posted by: TC | September 29, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
I think the McCain campaign is finally losing it. First they blame Obama and Dems then say its inappropriate at this time to affix blame. Which is it? The fact is the bill was lost on the Republican side. It seems to me that’s the end of the argument.
Posted by: asamiller | September 29, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Obama, ACORN, and Fannie Mae: What exactly does a “community organizer” do? Barack Obama’s rise has left many Americans asking themselves that question. Here’s a big part of the answer: Community organizers intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to customers with poor credit (Source: Stanley Kurtz, The National Review).
What if Barack Obama’s most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the largest radical group in America. If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you’d know what I was talking about. ACORN is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so. Yet because ACORN works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. ACORN likes it that way. And so, I’d wager, does Barack Obama.
In the name of fairness to minorities, community organizers occupy private offices, chant inside bank lobbies, and confront executives at their homes – and thereby force financial institutions to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in mortgages to low-credit customers.
In other words, community organizers help to undermine the US economy by pushing the banking system into a sinkhole of bad loans. And Obama has spent years training and funding the organizers who do it. Read the shocking details…
Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
The Republicans did as expected, but thanks to a few brave Democrats the bailout was rejected. I’m beginning to have faith in the party again.
Posted by: independent | September 29, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Wow posting a McCain advisor’s summary of events without noting so.
I guess even right wingers realize that no one believes the McCain campaign anymore.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
McCain is so put of control that I’m tempted to think that we’re talking a McCain here.
Posted by: reason | September 29, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
JohnTx that was written Kevin Hassett for Bloomberg news.
You’ll notice there is no mention of Rick Davis or Charlie Black getting millions to lobby for Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac
Kevin just happens to be a McCain advisor.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
60% of Democrats in the House voted for the bill.
33% of Republicans voted for it.
The only reason House Republicans are objecting to it is because it will put their re-election runs at risk.
They are putting themselves first and the country second.
Posted by: johnTX | September 29, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Barack Obama is truly a phenomenon of our time— a presidential candidate who cannot cite a single serious accomplishment in his entire career, besides advancing his own career with rhetoric.
Thomas S.
Posted by: TC | September 29, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
“Now is not the time to fix the blame…” 9/11 Commission
“Now is not the time to fix the blame.” Enron
“Now is not the time to fix the blame.” Director Meuller on FBI abuse of National Security letters
“Now is not the time to fix the blame” AG Mukasey on Attorneygate
When in the hell is it time to fisx the blame on the people responsible for screwing up everything they have ever touched, i.e. the Republican Party.
Posted by: tas | September 29, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
I blame the GOP for being so hyper-sensitive that they allowed their precious feelings get in the way of middle America. GOP, bring your crybaby selves down here to help many of these small business try to make pay-roll. They can’t get the credit they need to continue with their business. McCain, next time you are enjoying a 4 star dinner while your party is PUNTING on a bill they sponsored and you swooped in to save – there are plenty of us who can not afford groceries. Thanks for nothing GOP. Grow some thicker skin.
Posted by: Absurd | September 29, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Obama, ACORN, and Fannie Mae: What exactly does a “community organizer” do? Barack Obama’s rise has left many Americans asking themselves that question. Here’s a big part of the answer: Community organizers intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to customers with poor credit (Source: Stanley Kurtz, The National Review).
What if Barack Obama’s most important radical connection has been hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-term association with the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), the largest radical group in America. If I told you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you’d know what I was talking about. ACORN is at least as radical as these better-known groups, arguably more so. Yet because ACORN works locally, in carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. ACORN likes it that way. And so, I’d wager, does Barack Obama.
In the name of fairness to minorities, community organizers occupy private offices, chant inside bank lobbies, and confront executives at their homes – and thereby force financial institutions to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in mortgages to low-credit customers.
Posted by: Hussein_Islam_Oama | September 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
I am appalled and angry at the Republican Minority Leader who has the gall to blame Ms.Pelosi- who actually told the truth about the deficit.
“It’s the economy stupid” to quote a former president- 1 republican today actually said “It’s my job that’s important- I might not get relected if I vote yes”
It’s the Country not you thats important!!
Stupidity seems to reign in the Republican camp-The rest of the world is now laughing at the USA .
Posted by: sam | September 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
The Banks of the United States have reported 7 Trillion Dollars in bad mortgage debt. Let me ask all you geniuses out there what good is it going to do to have the tax payers buy 700 Billion Dollars of this 7 Trillion Dollar debt. Who knows how much more debt the banks and financial institutions have not been reported. Spending this 700 Billion Dollars on this debt is like throwing kerosene, dynamite and gasoline on a wild fire storm. It only makes the fire hotter and more dangerous and destroys those who fueled the fire just like giving the extremely rich this 700 billion dollars. The tax payers debt, the nation debt will just go up and prolong the tax payers suffering, starving, and wreak havoc on their physical, mental and financial health.
Posted by: Bob4USA | September 29, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Let me see if I have this right the vote was lost because some Republican lawmakers got butt hurt over some words, then to show their anger they thought that screwing the COUNTRY FIRST was the right thing to do! I thought McCain had unified everyone.
Posted by: Kim | September 29, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
McCain suspended his campaign and told us he was going to stay in Washington until a bill was passed…This is McCain’s fault he made a promise and did not follow through…McCain/Bush failed.
Posted by: lanawonders | September 29, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
TC
The democratic congress put there butts on the line to save the American economy.. The economy that has been put in this messy shape by the Republican party!
Why should the democrats take reasponabilty for doing all the lifting when your party made the mess!
GIVE ME A BREAK! Your position is stupid!
The Republican position is :
WELL WE WERE GOING TO PASS THIS BILL TO SAVE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY
BUT THEN PALOSI BLAMED US BECAUSE WE WHERE IN CHARGE FOR THE LAST 7.5 YEARS
SO SCREW SAVING AMERICA’S ECONOMY!
What a joke!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“I think John gets hurt by this,” said Ed Rollins, who worked on former Gov. Mike Huckabee’s primary campaign earlier this cycle. “He obviously, at the end of the day, said he was for it. But more important than that, he said he was the one who would bring them to the table and to a certain extent he will be viewed now as not being able to do that.”
Rollins added, “McCain is our nominee and [congressional Republicans] will do everything they can to help him, but they are not going to go over the cliff for him.”
Posted by: rogue | September 29, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
McCain should go fly a kite!! Two thirds of Democrats voted for bill. Only one third of Republicans voted for bill. These are the real facts. Republicans sold country out today!! Republicans put pettiness and politics ahead of what is truly good for America during this crisis!! Blaming Nancy Pelosi’s speech is just absurd. The congressmen are adults. They are not children. But maybe they are children???? I want to see names of those published who voted against this bill. No one liked this bill. But many did vote for because country is in danger of deep recession.
Posted by: Sharonklim | September 29, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
McCAIN = HYPOCRITE
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 29, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
OK. Look.
If I say “Push the button when I say ‘now’”, when do you push the button? Right. The moment I say “now”. Not before.
So when McCain says “Senator Obama and his allies in Congress infused unnecessary partisanship into the process,” it’s a complete sentence. It’s a moment in time.
Next, he says, “Now is not the time to affix the blame.” Another moment in time.
Get it? When he says “Now,” he means “Now!” Not “then”. Not “before”. The first sentence? That came before! That’s in the past! We’re putting that behind us, because we are focused on the present. (And the future. Naturally.)
It’s only the liberal elite media like you that are stuck in the past. (Wait. “that are stuck in the past?” Hmm. “that is stuck in the past”? Nevermind. That’s plurality, and we’re talking about tense.)
Where was I? Oh, yes. I was wearing an onion on my belt – which was the fashion at the time – …
Posted by: Jay Levitt | September 29, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
They also don’t like Palin and this is a good way to maake sure they are not elected she is notthe right person and after the election you will hear horror stories,,,,,,,,,,,
Posted by: indp voter | September 29, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Politico’s Ben Smith doesn’t buy McCain’s charge that this is all Obama’s fault
Ben writes:
McCain blames Obama, not House GOP, for House vote… It’s going to be a hard case to make though. About two-thirds of House Democrats supported the bill. About two thirds of House Republicans — whom McCain had explicitly returned to Washington to work — voted against it. And isn’t it about time to retire that “phoned it in” line?
Posted by: cs | September 29, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
So a Republican bill was defeated by Republicans and yet again it is Obama’s fault? Right…
Posted by: MIguy | September 29, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Again from Ben Smith / Politico:
Voting nay in McCain’s home state
A reader notes that all eight members of McCain’s Arizona delegation — four Democrats and four Republicans — voted “no.”
From the AP:
ARIZONA
Democrats — Giffords, N; Grijalva, N; Mitchell, N; Pastor, N.
Republicans — Flake, N; Franks, N; Renzi, N; Shadegg, N.
UPDATE: In Illinois — though Obama had staked less on his personal ability to win over doubters — the bill split the delegation 9-9, with one abstention. Democrats favored it narrowly, though former Obama antagonist Bobby Rush and his supporter Jesse Jackson Jr., like may in the Congressional Black Caucus, voted no.
UPDATE: Ryan Grim notes that Rush “went to the desk after the vote was over and changed from yes to no. So he was with Obama and the leadership if they needed him.”
Posted by: cs | September 29, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Wild man McCain can’t keep his own talking points straight.
Posted by: bubba | September 29, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
This proves Mclame is senile. First the Palin pick now he can’t even talk his own party into supporting a bill with him, then he just turns around and balmes it on Obama. THis man is now a joke!
Posted by: Joe | September 29, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
From the Politico …McCain takes credit for bill before it loses
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and his top aides took credit for building a winning bailout coalition – hours before the vote failed and stocks tanked.
The rush to claim he had engineered a victory now looks like a strategic blunder that will prolong the McCain’s campaign’s difficulty in finding a winning message on the economy.
Shortly before the vote, McCain had bragged about his involvement and mocked Sen. Barack Obama for staying on the sidelines.
“I’ve never been afraid of stepping in to solve problems for the American people, and I’m not going to stop now,” McCain told a rally in Columbus, Ohio. “Senator Obama took a very different approach to the crisis our country faced. At first he didn’t want to get involved. Then he was monitoring the situation.”
McCain, grinning, flashed a sarcastic thumbs-up.
Posted by: cs | September 29, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
he’ll want to put off the VP debate while they work this out.
Posted by: Danny | September 29, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Holy crap… I thought I’d seen brazen BS’ers before, but McCain takes the all-time prize for self-serving whoppers.
It was McCAIN who put on a show about suspending the campaign so he could guarantee that the bill passed. He failed miserably. And it was HIS OWN PARTY, the Republicans, who killed the bill! The majority of Democrats voted in favor of it. The majority of Republicans voted against it! So just WHO is putting politics before country, John? And why couldn’t YOU convince your own party to support your effort, if it was so important? So much for leadership. So much for truth. So much for honor.
Posted by: Fred | September 29, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Why did 2/3 of republicans vote against this bill. Dont they realize they will plunge America into another Great Depression.
It seems House republicans will rather win an election than save America.
Posted by: keith | September 29, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
here go your investments gang—-way to go mccain—-you cannot lie your way out of this one
Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Lets not try and spin the numbers:
The democrats stepped up:
Democrats voted for 141 voted against 94
Republicam vote for 66 voted against 132
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
JOhn McCains records speaks for itseof:
During his time in the senate, McCain has been a champion of government deregulation — some of which is being blamed for the Wall Street meltdown. Since the recent crisis, though, he has supported a plan for the government to take on the debt of failing financial institutions.
During a September 21 interview on CBS’s “60 Minutes,” McCain was asked if he regretted a 1999 vote for deregulating Wall Street. “No — I think the deregulation was probably helpful to the growth of our economy,” McCain said.
In footage of a speech aired during that interview, though, McCain voices support for government now stepping in. “I’m not saying this isn’t going to be messy and I’m not saying it isn’t going to be expensive,” he said, “but we have to stop the bleeding.”
The Verdict: True — although McCain has supported more government oversight of Wall Street as part of the bailout plan.
I guess his **** really does stink -
Posted by: jozy | September 29, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
One has to agree that the democrat starting with Pelosi and going through Obama played politics with this rather than doing their job. They should have encouraged everyone to work on the bill from day one. Of course the idea of pushing the bill through with no reivew was nuts. The American people would never buy that.
Posted by: later | September 29, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Republicans and the American economy…
Estimated stock market loss today: 1,2 trillion in American dollars.
Thanks, GOP!
Posted by: rogue | September 29, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
While the House Repubs are trying to save their bacon and now denounce all of Bushs policies, Americans are paying a huge price to their retirements, jobs, credit etc…
its a little too late to separate yourselves from GWB.
Dont make Americans pay even more for his Policies.
Amazing.
obama 08
Posted by: Jobamatx | September 29, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
i told you months ago that this guy mccain is DUMB—-and all mccain cares about is MCCAIN–TODAY HE HAS PROVED THIS.
Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
The Banks of the United States have reported 7 Trillion Dollars in bad mortgage debt. Let me ask all you geniuses out there what good is it going to do to have the tax payers buy 700 Billion Dollars of this 7 Trillion Dollar debt. Who knows how much more debt the banks and financial institutions have not been reported. Spending this 700 Billion Dollars on this debt is like throwing kerosene, dynamite and gasoline on a wild fire storm. It only makes the fire hotter and more dangerous and destroys those who fueled the fire just like giving the extremely rich this 700 billion dollars. The tax payers debt, the nation debt will just go up and prolong the tax payers suffering, starving, and wreak havoc on their physical, mental and financial health.
Posted by: Bob4USA | September 29, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
What a day of shame for republicans for killing this bill.
Posted by: keith | September 29, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
John MCcain just digs himself deeper and deeper. What are the chances Palin drops out by thursday?
Wow, just wait until the rebuttle time on the debate, when she will repeat herself over and over and over
Posted by: Jobamatx | September 29, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Let it burn – I don’t want to be responsible for more debt – especially while McCains friends profitted from it. Karl Marx said this would happen – give them enough rope and they will hang themselves.
Posted by: jozy | September 29, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Here that John
It is the sound of your campaign dropping in the polls
Posted by: fearforthefuture | September 29, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
later
Pelosi and Reed were able to get 2/3 of democrats to support this bill.
Republicans? Only 1/3 supported it at a crucial time when America is at risk of falling into another Great depression.
Posted by: keith | September 29, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Umm. If McCain says now is NOT the time to affix blame, it’s time to fix the problem, then why did he say Obama and his allies infused partisanship into the process? Isn’t that affixing blame? Is that Gaslighting or what? Did anyone else notice that? Does McCain listen to himself when he talks?
Posted by: Catherine | September 29, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Here is your reason, many of the companies that employee everyday americans rely on Credit to make payroll, if the credit market freezes as it has now. NO MORE JOBS….No more jobs, no more tax revenue…no more tax revenue….
Get it.
It sucks, but this is what Bush and his republican congress did to us.
Posted by: Jobamatx | September 29, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Let me get this straight. The Republicans decided to punish America and change votes because someone gave a speech that was less then bi-partisan. Give me a break. If the country falls into a depression we will know who to blame. The democrats didn’t need to include Republicans they could of got by with + 1 and included all they wanted in the bill, but we had to be bipartisan and let the Republicans baby around. While the Republicans through that tantrum the stock fell over 700 points. The Democrats arn’t to blame, the Republicans deregulated the bank and refuse to pay the POLITICAL PRICE of passing a bailout.
The democrats should just rewrite the bill for democrats and just pass it through.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
What did you expect? Assigning blame at the same time that you say one shouldn’t assign blame is like saying you’re going to suspend your campaign to work on the economy and then not suspending your campaign.
Posted by: Katia | September 29, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Phil Singer (and others) compare Republicans blaming Pelosi’s speech to Newt shutting down the government over because of seating arrangements on Air Force 1.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Bill of Crisis:
Administration (Republican) We must have it.
House (Democrat) OK but add this for the people.
House (Republican) NO, we want re-election. Screw the economy. It’s all about us!
Posted by: Wagthedog1001 | September 29, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
I keep flashing back to the final scene in Dr. Strangelove, when Slim Pickens rides the bomb into the target.
The Republicans are determined to ride the free market system into its complete collapse.
Posted by: Dogbiter | September 29, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
McCain and His Campaign Blame Obama and Democrats for Bailout Bill’s Death, McCain Says Now Is Not the Time to Affix Blame
This is why more and more Sarah Palin is seeming like the brains in this outfit.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 29, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
carolyn
First thing you learn in research is to make sure your sources are not bias and the info is credit.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Gosh John still have your campaign on suspension? Perhaps it should be in the corner with the dunce cap.
Posted by: Thinking | September 29, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Isn’t it funny how the sound of the stock market crashing sounds just like a McCain campaign stunt backfiring?
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 29, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Jake Tapper fails to mention the awful secret.
The democrats have enough members in both houses to pass the bill without a SINGLE Republican vote.
96 house democrats voted against their own party and the bill.
The media is so biased and owned by the Obama campaign that dirty and obvious little secret will never come out.
Posted by: infoseeking | September 29, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
carolyn
The problem started with the foreclosures and the deregulation of banks. Your just picking a small portion. This crisis has been caused by deregulation like the Enron loophole over the republican controlled congress.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
the democrats made me do it the democrats made me do it, waa waa…c’mon! What is this the bait and switch? Time to put on the big boy britches McCain. It was clearly the republicans that made the republicans vote. or were their fingers broken?
Posted by: Scott | September 29, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
I believe I heard that McCain was more or less responsible for 60+ “Ay” votes that the House Republicans made today.
So let me see, I believe that comes out to, oh yes, 60+ more votes than Obama was able to provide.
Posted by: SandyB | September 29, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
How American voters think Democrats control entire country in 2008. DISASTER.
Posted by: alex | September 29, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
So Republicans trash the American economy and when they’re asked to help repair it they’re TOO COWARDLY AND SELFISH TO LEND A HAND.
WHAT A SURPRISE.
REPUBLICANS ARE BLOODSUCKERS ON MIDDLE-CLASS AMERICA.
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 29, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“The problem started with the foreclosures and the deregulation of banks. Your just picking a small portion”
And even then she ignores that the GOP controlled Congress in 2004 and could have pushed thru regulations much like Republicans are arguing that the Democrats could have pushed thru the bailout bill.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
SandyB
You can’t he even justify your argument when the Democrats voted in a majority for the bill. The minute McCain step in to help everything blew up, he called victory right before the bill failed. Now he wants to pass the buck. Guess what the buck stops at the president and he can’t pass the buck.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
For the last 8 years, 2 terms of Bush & Cheney, most of that time, a republican congress…..smugly screaming about how great their policies were and how good for America it was, constantly denouncing their opposition as unpatriotic, anti-american … deficits unseen in American history, corruption, scandals of all kinds, …..
………….. great job , it was ‘hard work’ but Republicans have succeeded in doing what Bin Laden in his wildest dreams could not…
Now Republicans run from their own president and party to try and save face…..
for the Republicans it’s truly:
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 29, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Lawmakers actually want a financial crisis, yes I said it! They are trying to ruin the dollar therefore creating a NEED for the Amero a North American union of Maexico, Canada, and U.S. just like the Euro. Problem is they will trample our Constitution and rights taken away. Why don’t we change our leaders now before they continue to lie and do harm to us? My two ideas are: eliminate the one man President position and Congress entirely (even just temporarily) and create a National Council just like we have a City Council of 10-12 people a Chairman and all. City Councils are swift, concise, take in different views, and is a democratic ideology. The National Council would vote on immediate laws and reforms to FIX things and this cuts the fueding and bills that never get through. -OR- we fire all of the current Congress and President not by vote, by a 2008/09 Declaration of Independence (the old DOI pertains to today if read carefully) and install only Libertarians/Greens/Independents the Democrats and Repubs are corrupt. All elections should be individuals and their views only anyways, not my team your team, the party system is disgusting even to old people like my Grandmother, Parents. So we could install some Libertarians and/or Green Party people to have their crack at FIXING things. Seriously we eventually will have more independents move into higher positions, let’s speed up the transition and fire all these REP/DEM people and give the Ralph Nader, Ron Paul people their time NOW. They aren’t idiots or hippies, they have an ideology that if implemented would make a free country free and not suffering and forced into a new world order. Please present these ideas on your t.v. broadcast.
Posted by: Michael Juliano | September 29, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
SandyB
Get real you write:
“believe I heard that McCain was more or less responsible for 60+ “Ay” votes that the House Republicans made today.”
“So let me see, I believe that comes out to, oh yes, 60+ more votes than Obama was able to provide.”
Lets not try and spin the numbers:
The democrats stepped up: FACTS ARE FACTS..
Democrats voted for 141 voted against 94
Republicam vote for 66 voted against 132
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I’m amazed by what’s missing in the political analysis so far.
As everyone should know, the House Republicans do not like or favor John McCain, to put it mildly. They have not welcomed his returning to Washington for the stunt to them on board at all.
They don’t want the GOP to become McCain’s party.
They may have been ready to support the rescue plan by a small majority, but then – before the voting had started -
they heard John McCain declare that HE was to be given credit for the passing of the bill.
That was a reckless and very silly thing to do. A crucial McCain blunder.
The House Republicans took their chance to put McCain out there in the cold. They voted against. Against the plan, and against McCain.
Posted by: utah | September 29, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
SandyB
McCain was for placing blame before he was against it a few hours later.
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 29, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
So McCain blames Obama and the Dems for turning the bailout vote into a “political issue” after McCain himself runs with the campaign ploy of suspending activities and trying to hone in on some bailout credit in Washington last week. That’s absurd…
Posted by: matt | September 29, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
I am amazed at the ignorance present on this blog as I peruse these comments. A few key points:
1. McCain knew Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were in trouble in 2005, and proposed legislation to more carefully regulate them, which the Democrats BLOCKED.
2. Democrats didn’t actually need the Republicans to sign up for this bill. They have the majority in the house, remember? If Obama was as in charge of his party as everyone thinks, he could have pushed for passage as a Democratic feat. It was ‘up for re-election, and I sure don’t wanna be seen voting for a bill people hated’ jitters that caused Dems to back away from THEIR OWN BILL.
3. You criticize McCain for doing his job, suspending his campaign, and trying to get his party behind this bill. Huh? Give the man some credit – he actually WENT to DC to try to get something done. What did The Precious do?
4. The press helped kill this by labelling it the “Wall St Bailout Bill”. Oh please. Who wants to sign up to bail out a bunch of greedy tycoons? No one. The bill’s real intent was “US Financial Resuscitation.” Maybe if the press would have reported on it accurately, people wouldn’t have recoiled, and the Congress would have approved it.
5. We got in this mess thanks to Dems like Frank, who issued edicts down through lenders that things like bad credit shouldn’t hurt people from getting loans. Loosen up already, and make more loans to (insert target group here). Somehow, you’ve forgotten all that, and decided the Bush administration is to blame. I can’t stand Bush, and he’s pooed into the collective easter basket a lot, but you can’t blame this one on him or the Republicans.
If you spent time reading the three versions of that bill: Paulson’s, the Dems, and the Republican edits, you would realize the Republicans had done a lot to impose regulations and penalties, in an attempt to control these financial entities. It was the Dems that wanted the big giveaway, and keep on propping up bad loans that they encouraged in the first place.
Folks, do some research before you jump to conclusions. Your country’s future depends on it.
Posted by: sharonevolving | September 29, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Info Seeeking
you are wrong. The Dems didn`t introduce the bill, its Bush that introduced the bill.
So in conclusion the Repubs failed to support Bush and the Dems to save the country.
Remember 140 Dems suppoted it.
Only 65 Repubs supported it.
Posted by: keith | September 29, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
So much, it seems, for “not phoning it in.”
After a weekend of dial-tone McCain diplomacy, two-thirds of House Republicans (the same people McCain claimed to have “brought to the table”) voted against the bill.
Meanwhile, the Democrats delivered more votes than they promised.
Posted by: story line | September 29, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
The US doesn’t remotely have 7 trillion in bad mortgage debt.
Total mortgage debt in the US is 10 trillion, about half of which is made up of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac paper. The rest is sub-prime, Alt A and private money.
Despite all the news about rising foreclosures, they still make up a small fraction of overall mortgage debt.
Posted by: Pdxdem | September 29, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
So, Nancy Pelosi hurt the Republicans feelings???
Posted by: k | September 29, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
Sharonevolving
stop misinforming people on the blog. Its Bush that introduced the bill but Repubs have refused to support him. Dems have tried their best to support it by 2/3.
Only 1/3 repubs supported it. So your argument that Dems had enough members to pass this bill doesn`t make sense especially when it is the past 8 years of republican failed policies that has caused the recession.
Posted by: keith | September 29, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
sharonevolving
re: “You criticize McCain for doing his job, suspending his campaign, ”
since McCain and surrogates, in no way suspended his campaign… your point is meaningless
BTW:
•-> just think of how much money has been ‘looted’ from the Treasury in the last 8 years as a direct result of Republican policies and actions.
Hundreds of millions unaccounted for in Iraq..
and then Republicans and Conservatives have the nerve to blame lower income citizens for the housing crisis……
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 29, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Keith, you’re being silly. Bush introduced the bill with Paulson, the Dems wrote v2, which had uber handouts, and the Repubs wrote v3, which has heavier regulation. That v3 version got voted on, and failed today.
Again, the Dems have the majority in the house. Had Obama rallied them, and they all voted for it, it would have passed. McCain, ever the ‘work across the aisle’ guy, sometimes to his party’s chagrin, tried to get the Repubs on board because support was far from universal in either camp. You can blame the man for trying, but I can’t.
Posted by: sharonevolving | September 29, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“1. McCain knew Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were in trouble in 2005, and proposed legislation to more carefully regulate them, which the Democrats BLOCKED.”
LOL, this chestnut never gets old.
The truth is that Hagel intro’d that bill originally in 2003 (S. 1058). He reintro’d the bill for the 109th session of Congress in Jan 2005 (s.190). The Republicans controlled Congress and that committee but a party line vote made the bill passage difficult so it was sent back to committee.
In May of 2006 way after that bill was dead, McCain became a cosponsor and gave a speech about it. The Republican controlled Congress did not pick it up again.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“the Repubs wrote v3, which has heavier regulation. That v3 version got voted on, and failed today. ”
So Republicans voted against the bill they wrote?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
it’s all starting to unravel on all levels:
“Rove Emails Spotlight White House Role in U.S. Attorney Firing”
I can hear the doors of jail cells swingin’ open
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 29, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
McCain also said Sarah Palin is ready to be President if need be.
He’s starting to talk as much gibberish as she is.
Posted by: Danny | September 29, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Part of McCain’s speech in May, 2006 on Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005:
Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae’s regulator reported that the company’s quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were “illusions deliberately and systematically created” by the company’s senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.
The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae’s former chief executive officer, OFHEO’s report shows that over half of Mr. Raines’ compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac.
The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator’s examination of the company’s accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs–and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO’s report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO’s report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.
I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.
I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation.
Sharonevolving here again. Now look at the Democratic response:
It never made it out of committee. Chris Dodd, then the ranking member of the Banking Committee and now its chair, was in the middle of receiving preferential loan treatment from Countrywide Mortgage, one of the companies gaming the system in the credit crisis. Meanwhile, Barack Obama took hundreds of thousands of dollars from the lobbyists McCain mentions in this speech, making him the #2 recipient of Fannie/Freddie money.
Tell me again who you think is behind what here?
Posted by: sharonevolving | September 29, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
sharonevolving
Wrong again. Federal lobbyist don’t donate to Obama. Check online. Hypocritical coming from the 7 fed lobbyist running McCain’s campaign. Who is really playing politics with the bailout crisis. Hint: Its not the Democrats.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
sharonevolving
Your arguments eats it self, you blame democrats for not getting it pass despite the republicans writing the legislation and then voting it down. What planet are you from?
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
MM – drinking that cool-aid pretty heavily, are we? You’re conflating two things: federal lobbyist with Fannie Mae / Freddy Mac contributions.
Here are the top recipients of campaign contributions from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, 1989-2008:
Name
Office
Party/State
Total
1. Dodd, Christopher J
S
D-CT
$133,900
2. Kerry, John
S
D-MA
$111,000
3. Obama, Barack
S
D-IL
$105,849
Try again, peeps. Do some research.
Posted by: sharonevolving | September 29, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
The Republicans were in control of Congress for 12 years. How is it that it is the Democrats fault.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
“It never made it out of committee. ”
S.190 was dead when McCain made his speech a year and a half after it was intro’d.
“Meanwhile, Barack Obama took hundreds of thousands of dollars from the lobbyists McCain mentions in this speech, making him the #2 recipient of Fannie/Freddie money.
Tell me again who you think is behind what here?”
Obama got about $120K in campaign donations from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac employees.
Rick Davis and Charlie Black made several million a piece lobbying for Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.
Who is behind what indeed….
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Sharonevolving
You are being silly because you agree the bill was introduced by Bush and Paulson.
The question is who introduced the bill. Answer is G W Bush so it was introduced by the president who is a republican. Now tell me what you dont understand.
Posted by: keith | September 29, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
sharonevolving
Wrong again. Let’s say I am a bank teller at Bank of America. I donate to Barack Obama. The site automatically list me as Bank of America. Am I a lobbyist. You need to read the law before you spew cool -aid. What is up that phrase any-way? When did Hawaiian punch become a political term.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Jake – I want to see a list of the 12 + House Republicans who stood with Cantor of Virginia stating they did not vote for this Bill because their feelings got hurt. The fact that some poorly timed words by another politician were more important than the survival of the nation’s financial system is 100% negligent on their part. Those Republicans need to go home, find new jobs and get some thicker skin.
Posted by: Take a hike GOP | September 29, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
The Republicans were in control of Congress for 12 years. How is it that it is the Democrats fault?
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
sharonevolving
Did you make up those numbers? Obama wasn’t even in the state senate in 1989.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
sharonevolving
Baracks raised million from the armed forces so is he in bed with the Airforce ? The army ? The navy ? Is he doing them favours ?
Or do people who serve our country just want him to be our President ?
Same goes for the staff at fannie and freddie! They donated to Obama because they like him.
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Man that CBS interview looks like a doozy.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
McCain and Palin refer to the question by a voter on Pakistan in a cheesesteak place as gotcha journalism.
Hear that voters?
Asking the candidates a question is now considered gotcha journalism.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Ryan C
Anything you ask Palin is a gotcha question because she doesn’t know anything.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
During a September 21 interview on CBS’s “60 Minutes,” McCain was asked if he regretted a 1999 vote for deregulating Wall Street.
“No — I think the deregulation was probably helpful to the growth of our economy,” McCain said.
Posted by: matter of fact | September 29, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
“Anything you ask Palin is a gotcha question because she doesn’t know anything.”
While I think Palin is out of her element a great deal, I think the greater crime is the way the McCain campaign has shielded her.
It just gives credence to the theory that McCain picked Palin to win the media news cycle after Obama’s excellent nomination speech in which he destroyed the Republican party.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 29, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
From the smoke & mirrors department: It’s amazing how often republicans mention that Obama was the “2nd largest beneficiary of contributions from Fannie and Freddie”….For those who are reasonble, let’s put this in perspective. Obama received about $138K from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac EMPLOYEES..McCain received @ $30K for employees of these 2 companies….This ranks him #2 because the contributions were supporting his Presidential campaign…But let’s assume the “worse” and assume these $$$ were targeted for “influence”…How much would this “buy” from Obama?…Consider that the Obama campaign has raised @ 1/2 BILLION $$ in contributions…Do the math: 138,000 < 500,000,000 = less than 100th of 1 percent of his campaign's take…Nobody "owns" Obama…His grassroots contributors have made sure of that fact…This is a fact that won't make it's way onto a GOP attack commercial but it's a fact nonetheless.
Posted by: TruthHurts | September 29, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
All weekend we heard the phrase, “We’re making progress.” Today, we were assured that House leaders had the votes to pass this humongous bailout bill to save the economy from a meltdown. We should know better.
When the roll was called, the necessary votes were missing. Wall Street was like a yo-yo on a string. At one point, the Dow was down more than 700 points. And it all happened despite the efforts of John McCain to anoint himself the savior of the bailout package.
It turns out members of McCain’s own party balked at voting for the bailout in the house.
So, what do we learn from that?
Posted by: McVain | September 29, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
JOHN McCAIN = DISASTER FOR AMERICA
SARAH PALIN = DISASTER FOR AMERICA
REPUBLICAN PARTY = DISASTER FOR AMERICA
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 29, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
Can’t wait to hear Palin’s analysis of the various risks of investment banking!
Thursday night will be a highlight in American comedy!
Count the times she’ll use the word “also”!
It’s her favorite word!
Palin for waitress of McMoose!
Posted by: Miss W | September 29, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
777 worse point drop in history. Thank You Republicans.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
So, what do we learn from that?
I take that McCain cant even get his own party to follow him let alone reach accross the party lines!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Sharonevolving
I see lots of posts to this person, but not the original post.
What happened to it?
Posted by: Matt S | September 29, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
OBAMA: And he’s absolutely right.
OBAMA: John’s right.
OBAMA: Senator McCain is absolutely right.
OBAMA: John, you’re absolutely right.
OBAMA: Senator McCain is also right. Senator McCain is absolutely right.
OBAMA: Senator McCain and I, I think agree.
OBAMA: I give Senator McCain great credit.
OBAMA: Senator McCain and I agree for the most part on these issues.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Matt S
See:
sharonevolving | Sep 29, 2008 7:54:05 PM
sharonevolving | Sep 29, 2008 7:27:02 PM
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
Cultural Amnesia
You didn’t watch the debate. You miss the 88 other minutes of Obama disagreeing with McCain. But You may have amnesia.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
MM put it in perspective. The 777 point drop as a percentage didn’t even make the top ten worst days of the market.
Bad? Yes, but not anywhere near the worst.
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 29, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Cultural Amnesia
Each time Obama said he agreed with McCain on the problem and then offered his solution which are far better than john mccains!
Face facts McCain lost the debate if the best you can do is say Obama agreed with mccain on the problems… Thats sad!
Obama has the better answers!
All non FOX polls prove that !
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
re: Post by: Miss W | Sep 29, 2008 8:30:42 PM
What is Obama’s favorite word?
Uh……..
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 29, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
McCain keeps making a fool of himself.
His VP keeps making a fool of herself.
And anyone who supports these two is making a fool of themselves.
The ship is sinking.
Posted by: Ship of Fools | September 29, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Concerned in OH
How can anyone believe a word you right when you dont know 60% is a majority ?
Silly person!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
What exactly is Obama’s solution to this economic mess? Where is the leader of the Democratic Party in pushing for his solutions?
What exactly would Obama do differently from Bush in stopping Iran from developing a nuclear bomb? Nothing but the same.
Vote Obama for a new face to the old Bush policies.
Obama/Bush 2008
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 29, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Cultural Amnesia
We saw the debate. We know Obama agreed that there are problems. Unlike Republicans, who obviously don’t understand. Apparently they just want to disagree regardless of the consequences.
GOP before county! McCain before integrity! Ignorance before foresight.
Posted by: Dumbfest in the GOP | September 29, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
Cultural Amnesia, winning a debate while giving your opponent credit for various things is part of the high art of rhetorical persuasion.
You should study the classics more. And learn a thing or two.
It clearly worked for Obama. Check the Gallup poll on the debate. He won big.
McCain wouldn’t even DARE to say Obama is right on anything. Just as he doesn’t dare to look his oppenent in the eyes.
All that is fear and weakness, as you could have learned from the old masters.
An audience will condemn it, as they did.
Posted by: Quintilianus | September 29, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Dave in lv
Regulate the industry. Pass another stimulus package. Cut taxes to the middle class (the people that move are economy forward). Already pass a bill on Nuclear Proliferation.
You don’t know the issues. It is funny that now you guys want to compare Obama to Bush when factually speaking McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time.
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Concerned in OH
If you and I split $100 I get $60 you get $40 who gets the most ???
COME ON!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Concerned in OH
You are arguing semantics now. 60% is most to some people because it is a majority. Your just trying to hide the fact that Republicans failed. The Republicans didn’t even need to support in a majority and they still didn’t get it pass.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Micheal Juliano Says:”Lawmakers actually want a financial crisis, yes I said it! They are trying to ruin the dollar”. Do you mean the US dollar that is worth less than 5 cents compared with a 1970 dollar? There is an abiding “crisis” ongoing. It is the main attack against working men and women of America. We are forced to have to compete for jobs against the lowest paid workers internationally. It happened in the clerical services nationwide, when billing was moved wholesale overseas… Due to lack of trade restrictions, products can be made anywhere, causing job exports top be seen as a desirable strategy by business. We are paid wages based on a continually shrinking dollar, while producers sell their wares for a parity price with the real cost. This crisis will further devalue our dollar and we will become even cheaper labor for the rich. It’s all interconnected. Make no mistake… The dollar is worth only so much a unit, more units, less value… Inject 700billion units and you have to divide the quantity of circulated money by the value… Oh, btw, if 2/3 of Democrats vote to accept the deal and 2/3 Republicans vote to reject it, who is failing as a group to support the bill ? Is as if somehow we are expected to see other than what is in front of our eyes…
Posted by: Curtis | September 29, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
ONE of the two VP’s on the rescue plan:
“That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, we’re ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the healthcare reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh — it’s got to be all about job creation too. Shoring up our economy, and putting it back on the right track. So healthcare reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, um, scary thing, but 1 in 5 jobs being created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.”
Posted by: Hahahahahahaha | September 29, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Concerned in OH
The democrats stepped up: FACTS ARE FACTS..
Democrats voted for 141 voted against 94
Republicam vote for 66 voted against 132
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
re Post by: Hahahahahahaha | Sep 29, 2008 9:00:40 PM
Read any Biden quotes lately?
Ever hear the one about FDR when he was President in 1929….
Have a great laugh!
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 29, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
Concerned in OH
Why would 2/3rds of Republicans vote “no”?
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Yes, Republicans, do read this Palin comment on the rescue plan over twice. Be honest to yourself. Even Mitt Romney is starting to question Palin. Read it again, and think what the possibility of a Palin Presidency would mean to the United States Of America and to its standing in the world. Here we go, take care:
“That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, we’re ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the healthcare reform that is needed to help shore up our economy. Um, helping, oh — it’s got to be all about job creation too. Shoring up our economy, and putting it back on the right track. So healthcare reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions, and tax relief for Americans, and trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, um, scary thing, but 1 in 5 jobs being created in the trade sector today. We’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All of those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.”
Posted by: mink | September 29, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Cultural Amnesia
McCain got the tactic/ strategy line wrong Obama was right. Concluding that someone is naive or inexperience is fallacy argument if you don’t back it up. McCain never back the claim up. Obama disagreed with McCain on spending, Iraq, Afghanistan, War on Terror, catching Osama bin Laden, Russia, energy.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
re Post by: Alex Independent. | Sep 29, 2008 9:03:15 PM
Fact 1: Dems CONTROL Congress, both house and Senate.
Fact 2: Congress didn’t pass the bill.
Fact 3: Worst do nothing Congress ever!!
Fact 4: With Dems in control of Congress, nothing gets done. They can’t even vote appropriations on time. They’re too busy attacking Bush
Just like the scorpion trying to cross the river.
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 29, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Cultural Amnesia
Yes McCain came off as a little little man! An agry liitle man!
We all saw the debate most of America believes Obama won!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Sharon? Look up Davis, McCain’s cmpign manager – he gets a monthly check – STILL for his work as a lobbyist from the lenders and he is also paid by the McCain campaign.
If you have any time after that, look up Phil Gramm, who was John McCain’s chief economic advisor, has a been a banking lobbyist, was McCain’s co-chair, wrote the 1999 deregulation bill and wrote the bill that got us all into this mess – the 2000 Commodities Future Act – whch allowed credit default swaps. The jackal Bill Clinton signed off on both – so I’m not saying only one party is to blame – but Phil Gramm – with his asinine statements this year that economics problems were “mental” takes the cake.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Cultural Amnesia
Yes Obama got contribution from Fannie May employers not lobbyist. Obama has raised half a billion dollars in mostly small donations. The fact that Republicans are politicizing the crisis is deafening.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Concerned in OH
More Fox propaganda they dont tell you the republicans were in control do they ?
If it was so bad they could have voted to fix it all by them selves!
Sean Hanity isnt news his fake entertainment!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Cultural Amnesia
By the way McCain politicizing dead troops is not patriotic.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Cultural Amnesia
I guess you want victory in Iraq and another 9/11 since we haven’t caught Osama.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Concerned in OH
The democratic congress put there butts on the line to save the American economy.. The economy that has been put in this messy shape by the Republican party!
Why should the democrats take reasponabilty for doing all the lifting when your party made the mess!
GIVE ME A BREAk! You position is stupid!
The Republican position is :
WELL WE WERE GOING TO PASS THIS BILL TO SAVE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY
BUT THEN PALOSI BLAMED US BECAUSE WE WHERE IN CHARGE FOR THE LAST 7.5 YEARS
SO SCREW SAVING AMERICA’S ECONOMY!
What a joke!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Concerned in OH
For every 1 legislation they tried to pass regulations on, they pass 10 deregulation or loophole laws.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Concerned in OH
You clearly need a civics leason! republicans controled the congress and the presidency at the time they made those stamtements play on fox that you pointed too!
If there was a problem the had the white house and the congress to push anything they wanted through!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Cultural Amnesia |
I guess you don’t even follow McCain’s lead. “This is not a time for Blame”
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Pelosi was all for this bill. Dems really put their neck on the line for this one!!!
Of course she told 16 Dems NOT to vote for it and the bill was defeated by 10 votes.
Dems like to have it both ways.
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 29, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Concerned in OH
Democrats vote Majority for the bill. Republicans vote in a minority for the bill. It is the democrats fault the bill didn’t pass. Someone was bad at connect the dots.
Who’s fault is it that the bill didn’t pass?
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
This old guy is an embarassment
Posted by: Omentum | September 29, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Dave in lv
Okay so Republicans are okay because they didn’t listen to McCain and voted 2/3 against the bill. The dems are to blame for providing the majority to pass the bill and they complied. So Dems are responsible for not doing enough despite Republican inaction. Woww. So Republicans refused to pay the POLITICAL PRICE in greater numbers.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
Cultural Amnesia
Doctoring false conversations will not help you.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Well if Obama stopped phoning it in maybe he wouldn’t have gotten faulty information that the bill would pass. It was all over the news all morning that there were still serious concerns with the bill. Loser (I mean Speaker) Pelosi helped nothing by calling people unpatriotic and blaming Bush, etc. Hey guess what 95 Dems voted AGAINST it. Bottom line is, taxpayers do not want this (dem or repub!) and many world class economic brains are saying there is a another way instead of all of us bailing out wall street and the banks who shouldn’t have given so many loans they knew people couldn’t pay back.
Posted by: kathy | September 29, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Blame
It it would have passes. They would have been praising him for coming back to ARLINGTON AT HIS CAMPAIGN HEADQUARTERS AND GOING TO HAVE A LAVISH LUNCHEON WITH THE TURNCOAT LOSERMAN AND THEIR WIVES.
Since it didn’t pass lets spin and BLAME IT ON OBAMA.
Obama was the one that said THE CANDIDATES should stay out of it.
THEY ARE BOTH SENATORS. Guess what the bill goes from the House to the Senate FOR MORE DELIBERATIONS. THAT is when GRampie and Obama put their two cents in on the legislation.
Now McSame is out there looking like a Jurassic Baby crying and wimpering it OBAMA’S FAULT.
I tell you if this Guy and his Bimbo VP makes into office AMERICA DESERVES TO BECOME A THIRD WORLD NATION.
If McNutbag gets in LEARN CHINESE …. they basically own us now. A McCain Presidency will seal the deal.
this is an outrage.
Posted by: Omentum | September 29, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
kathy
The democrats stepped up: FACTS ARE FACTS..
Democrats voted for 141 voted against 94
Republicam vote for 66 voted against 132
The Republican position is :
WELL WE WERE GOING TO PASS THIS BILL TO SAVE THE AMERICAN ECONOMY
BUT THEN PALOSI BLAMED US BECAUSE WE WHERE IN CHARGE FOR THE LAST 7.5 YEARS
SO SCREW SAVING AMERICA’S ECONOMY!
What a joke!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Now Fox is talking about Acorn. Obama has proven over and over again that he is associated with fraud, loony people and criminals.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
when he mentioned blame – he was talking about who is to blame for getting us into this mess in the first place, not who is to blame for the defeat of the bill!!!!! Which, BTW, even 40% of Democrats voted NAY!!!!!
Posted by: Lori Buford | September 29, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Amnesia
Like McCain, you are out of touch with reality.
McCain is old suffering from senility
What’s your excuse?
Posted by: Omentum | September 29, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
So, the stock market today lost nearly twice what the bailout would have cost. Hmmm???? This could be what was meant by “it will be more costly to do nothing.” Some people need to pull their heads out of their “sandwiches”.
Posted by: Amy T | September 29, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
re Post by: mara | Sep 29, 2008 9:10:24 PM
Sharon? Look up Davis, McCain’s cmpign manager – he gets a monthly check – STILL for his work as a lobbyist from the lenders and he is also paid by the McCain campaign.
————————————–
Don’t let the facts stop you.
Davis left his firm in 2005.
Davis does NOT receive any fee, any salary, any dividend, any stock option, NOTHING from his old company.
Davis stopped performing and registering as a lobbyist in 2005.
Prior to 2005, when he was a lobbyist Davis did not lobby on behalf of Fannie or Freddie.
Davis’s old company did receive money to lobby on behalf of Fannie and Freddie.
Best wishes
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 29, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
This is not a one procedure fix. But now WE HAVE NO CHOICE.
IF NOTHING PASSES YOUR 401K GONE
YOUR ABILITY TO GET CREDIT – GONE
YOUR JOB – POTENTIALLY GONE
Wow ….. this is sooooo stupid.
Barack Obama THE ONLY ONE WITH COMMON sense says WE NEED THIS DONE NOW and lets reassess later if need be.
THE HOUSE ON FIRE AND THE CONGRESS IS FIGHTING ABOUT WHETHER TO POUR WATER ON THE FIRE.
For the first time in my entire life I AM SCARED OF MY COUNTRY.
Posted by: Omentum | September 29, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Now is not the time to affix the blame but OBAMA did it.
YOU SEE FOLKS THIS GUY IS NUTZOID.
DON’T VOTE FOR THIS GUY. HE AS LOST HIS BEARINGS.
Posted by: Omentum | September 29, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Concerned in OH
Employees and lobbyist are two different types of people. distinguish the two
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Cultural Amnesia
Fox also called Obama a terrorist. Republicans called Dr. King a communist. They convinced you that up is down. And the fault of the man running into the tree was the tree for being there.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
“Distressed” mortgages aren’t necessarily bad assets, or ones that won’t be paid back. It simply means these are debts that are selling way way below their longterm value. No one wants to pick up anyone’s mortgages because housing prices are going down, foreclosures are going up, and shareholders of banks don’t want them on the books.
So a package of mortgages that might be worth a million bucks in the long term if they’re all paid back is only getting, say, $200,000 on the market. That’s what’s shrinking the credit markets.
This is a purely speculative problem. The main problem is that the underlying economy truly sucks. Unless we are investing our time, energy, and remaining money in productive industries, education, and renewable resources, we will not have helped the real economy at all.
h/t Rushkoff
Posted by: Flash Override | September 29, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
MARTIN LUTHER KING WAS A REPUBLICAN
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
This old canard! The only time MLK spoke on partisan matters was to criticize Goldwater. Also, all his friends say he voted for Kennedy.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
One of the giant mortgage companies at the heart of the credit crisis paid $15,000 a month to a firm owned by Senator John McCain’s campaign manager from the end of 2005 through last month, according to two people with direct knowledge of the arrangement. The disclosure contradicts a statement Sunday night by Mr. McCain that the campaign manager, Rick Davis, had no involvement with the company for the last several years. Mr. Davis’s firm received the payments from the company, Freddie Mac, until it was taken over by the government this month along with Fannie Mae, the other big mortgage lender whose deteriorating finances helped precipitate the cascading problems on Wall Street, the people said…
…On Sunday, in an interview with CNBC and The New York Times, Mr. McCain responded to a question about Mr. Davis’s role in the advocacy group through 2005 by saying that his campaign manager “has had nothing to do with it since, and I’ll be glad to have his record examined by anybody who wants to look at it.”
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Unless a rescue plan is passed soon, many of you who have doubted “trickle down economics” may soon witness it first hand–in reverse. The irony is wealth “trickles” down, while the loss of wealth will likely “gush” down.
Posted by: James Danley | September 29, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Also, all his friends say he voted for Kennedy.
__________________________________
Which MLK friends say that he voted for Kennedy?
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Newsweek confirms the story:
Freddie Mac had previously paid an advocacy group run by Davis, called the Homeownership Alliance, $30,000 a month until the end 2005, when that group was dissolved. That relationship was the subject of a New York Times story Monday, which drew angry denunciations from the McCain campaign. McCain and his aides have vehemently objected to suggestions that Davis has ties to Freddie Mac-an especially sensitive issue given that the Republican presidential candidate has blamed “the lobbyists, politicians and bureaucrats” for the mortgage crisis that recently prompted the Bush administration to take over both Freddie Mac and its companion, Fannie Mae, and put it under federal conservatorship.
But neither the Times story — nor the McCain campaign — revealed that Davis’s firm, the Washington, D.C. based lobbying firm Davis Manafort, continued to receive $15,000 a month from Freddie Mac until last month-long after the Homeownership Alliance had been terminated. The two sources, who requested anonymity discussing sensitive information, told Newsweek that Davis himself approached Freddie Mac in 2006 and asked for a new consulting arrangement that would allow his firm to continue to be paid. The arrangement was approved by Hollis McLoughlin, Freddie Mac’s vice president for external relations, because “he [Davis] was John McCain’s campaign manager and it was felt you couldn’t say no,” said one of the sources. [McLoughlin did not return phone calls].
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
Concerned in OH,
Actually, the dot-com bubble crash wiped out about $5 trillion in market value of the technology companies from March 2000 to October 2002. Some would argue that the dot-com bust money was really money that never really was more than numbers on spreadsheets anyway. We did provide fiscal bolstering of the economy then, albeit maybe not the wisest approach, by the Fed flooding the market with money, creating inflation and contributing to the creation of the next bubble…housing, with low interest rates and easy terms to “rebuild the economy.” Perhaps you could say, today is a result of the dot-com’s band-aid “pay me later” approach. Today, in one day, we lost close to $1.4 trillion, and we are no where near declaring this is over. Yeah, maybe we should have done something different in early 2000; but why the heck should we not learn from the error of our ways and actually take the proverbial “bull by the horns” now.
Posted by: Amy T | September 29, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
We could put together a plan that will get the remaining Democratic votes that are needed to pass, if the Republicans remain hell bent on forcing the Democratic Party to take ownership of this. You Republicans aren’t going to like it though.
The best model for resolving this crisis is the one that was followed in Sweden following the financial crisis in the Scandanavian countries.
We have to nationalize these companies. There is no better alternative.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 29, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Politics ahead of country? Or could it be the American people ahead of politics? I would rather the solution come slowly and fairly than fast and furious. The last time there was such a frenzy was right before we bombed Iraq. Where exactly are those WMD’s?
Posted by: Bea | September 29, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
Cult, get a clue. King was a target of Hoover before Kennedy was ever in office.
Someone failed US History 101.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
McCain voted against MLK day!
enuff said..
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 29, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Cultural Amnesia
He was accused by Hoover the director of the FBI and McCarthy the Republican congressman (or senator I can’t remember). Kennedy was the one that helped the civil rights legislation the most.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
JOHN MCCAIN SUSPENDED HIS CAMPAIGN TO LEAD HIS REPUBLICANS “TO SHOW HIS LEADERSHIP.” WELL, he is not much of a leader! He let his party sabotage the bailout bill, not once but twice about 700 billion dollar bailout! His infantile, sensitve, and stupid congressional republicans, have now cost American Taxpayers 1.2 trillion dollars in 6 hours! It seems the congressional republican leaders thin skin, partisan biggering, and determination to flunt John Mccain as the savior of the day created a disaster for our financial markets! LOSING 1.2 TRILLION DOLLARS EVERY 6 HOURS OVER THE NEXT 2 DAYS WILL MAKE 700 BILLION LOOK LIKE POCKET CHANGE! JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLICANS PUTTING THE COUNTRY FIRST!
Posted by: everym | September 29, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
everym,
That just isn’t true. Wall Street may lose 1.2 trillion, but you forget that most Americans don’t have ANY retirement fund to lose there anyway!
Posted by: Flash Override | September 29, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
I liked the ‘partisan biggering’ line though. Since its the Republicans, it would be more accurate to call it ‘partisan buggering’ though.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 29, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Cultural Amnesia
Just because Kennedy died before the legislation got past didn’t mean he didn’t push it. Don’t insult me. Republicans started the Red Scare not the other way around.
Posted by: MM | September 29, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
All of this on the GOP WATCH.
THE CAPTAIN OF THIS SHIP IS GEORGE BUSH.
REPUBLICANS……. PLEASE YOU HAVE STUNK THE PLACE UP ENOUGH
8 IS ENOUGH
GO AWAY
Posted by: Omentum | September 29, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
It’s just like when McCain blamed Obama for high gas prices. He must think we are really stupid.
Posted by: cincyr | September 29, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
I can’t even freakin believe Barak Obama and his audacity. He has his hand in this financial mess and now he is acting like it has nothing to do with him. He voted against the regulation and now he is saying “they” should have regulated it. Who the hell is “they”? What a complete jerk. He knows there are enough people that won’t listen to the truth and will vote for him anyway so he keeps lying, because he can. God will not allow it. A man cannot lie forever, sooner or later it will catch up to him. But will there be an America by then?
Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Brenda – Facts don’t seem to matter to you much at all. This mess – centered on credit default swaps – is Phil Gramm’s baby. He wrote the Bill – with the help of lobbyists in the financial industry. Look it up. December 2000. It passed on the 15th, to be exact. Obama did not have a lot to do with that bill. He also doesn’t have anyone on his payroll who is still receiving money from the lenders – unlike Rick Davis, a major lobbyist and a manager of the McCain campaign.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
The deregulation passed the Senate by a 90-8 margin in 1999. Obama wasnt in the Senate then.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
Most of all, what this episode teaches us is that House Republicans don’t like John McCain, and they don’t trust him.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 29, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
I know alot of people who lost alot of money today in the stock market. These are knowledgeable people with degrees in finance and ecomonics. These people say that Barak Obama would be the worst possible thing for the American Economy because he just doesn’t get it. He’s a lawyer not an economist, as evidenced by the fact that he voted “NO” against every bill for regulation of this mess. He didn’t see the problem down the road and he doesn’t see the problems down the road with his plan for America. He wants to hurt company’s with all of his taxes. Add in all of the spending he wants to do, like gov. run health care, more handouts. Where does he think this money is going to come from. There is no money. HE JUST DOESN’T GET IT. 400 lead economists said this bill is bad for the American people as it stood today. But they agree we do need to do something or the whole system will collapse and where is Barak Obama, MIA.
Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Concerned – Are you nuts? Do you honestly think that John McCain did not receive any money from Wall Street? He has 150 lobbyists on payroll. His manager still receives a monthly check from one of the biggest lenders in this entire mess.
Jozy – John McCain has never been a champion of market deregulation – in fact just the opposite. His closest financial advisor, Phil Gramm, wrote the 1999 deregulation act, and John McCain voted for it.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Cult is attempting to quote a commentator who attempted to ridicule Biden by saying ‘here’s a guy who thought FDR was president during the Great Depression’ thus proving the commentator a complete idiot.
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
Sorry Dave, as part of his severance with the lenders – Rick Davis was given a monthly check for his services which continued until last month. I guess that’s how it works with the very, very rich.
Posted by: mara | September 29, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
That’s it ol’ man. Blame Obama, That’ll do the trick… Shall we swear you now then?
Posted by: dem in chicago | September 29, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
mara….He voted against it in 2006 do your homework.
Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Brenda,
Doesn’t it concern you at all that your friends, “knowledgeable people with degrees in finance and ecomonics” are the same people that got us into this mess?
Posted by: Mike | September 29, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Lol, they are getting sillier by the minute aren’t they? I’d laugh if it weren’t such a tragedy to see McCain keep sinking and sinking.
And the excuses from the conservative talking heads on Plain is just mind boggling. Could they possibly make Palin look even weaker. “She’s losing her self-confidence.” “She’s over prepared.” “She needs someone around her who knows her.” SHE’S A WOMAN, NOT A LITTLE GIRL ON THE PLAYGROUND!
This is embarrassing. We don’t need the first woman to rise to this level to be carried and ultimately be a catostrophic failure; it hurts ALL women.
What the heck are these Palin apologists thinking? They’re just multiplying people’s doubt. How WEAK is she? Cripes!
As if McCain wasn’t making a fool of himself all by himself, he’s got this ridiculous, pathatic woman needing so much deference, group therapy, and pity.
This is the stupidest reality show I’ve eever seen, because the entire premise oof the show is laughable, that McCain/Palin expect to lead the free world. No one would buy that story line.
Posted by: Teri B. | September 29, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
brenda,
mccain does not get it, and he said so.
remember his line, “I don’t know much about economy”
Mccain and Palin will be the worst for this country.
the reps. are pulling a strings, and tying each other up in knots.
they really are showing they are a most paranoid group of people right now.
someone said it last week, that mccain stunt to not go to the debate, and have it the next week-was a way for them to buy time for palin to practice for the debate. i said no i don’t believe they would do that. but now i think that is part of what they were trying to do.
for mccain to be the great patriot he was, picking palin as his running mate was the most un-patriotic thing he could do. why didn’t he pick kay bailey hutchingson, or someone like her.
palin is in way over her head. it is unfair to her, and very unfair to the american people.
Posted by: j | September 29, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
I’ve never seen a bigger liar and more ethically corrupt man than John “the punk” McCain. He brings new lows to his dishonesty and snarkiness every day. I pray that he loses big. Some may not agree with his personal ideology, but Obama is truly a class act. What does it say about our country, that McCain is still close enough to steal it if he can continue to lie and attack enough to convince gullible voters to vote for him. Disgusting, sexist, sarcastic, boorish, condescending, and arrogant behavior from McCain is typical now. He will say and do anything to steal the White House. He must be stopped by voters- for the good of the country.
Posted by: Joan | September 29, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Can someone get these guys a history book>
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Liberal democrats are playing political partisanship for their hunger for power, blaming Republicans for Democrats incompetence in leadership. When McCain proposed regulation of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae 3 years ago Democrats vehemently opposed it now Liberal Nancy Pelosi blames Republicans?! Democrats are spinning this and hoping on the naiveté of the American people.
Posted by: 2nfer | September 29, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Anyone else here concerned that the US just printed $600 billion today, just hours before Wall Street tanked?
Posted by: Flash Override | September 29, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Obama may not have the experience I wish he had, but he’s got more wisdom, judgment, education, and common sense in his little finger than McCain does apparently.
I used to respect McCain, about 8 yrs. ago, before he became Bush’s lap dog, and before he started making a complete fool of himself on a daily basis in this campaign, and before he insulted competent women by picking Preposterous Palin. She was an adequate Runner up to Miss Alaska, but NOT to the President of the United States of America.
Give me a freakin’ break.
Posted by: Teri B. | September 29, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
If the Obamabots think Palin is so dumb do you keep bringing her up? You guys are obsessed with her and her family.
Posted by: Cultural Amnesia | September 29, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
Here is the irony of this hole deal. The Democrats needed ZERO republican votes. Obama and Pelosi could not even lead their own party to pass this thing. Then they point the finger. Obama can’t lead the Democrats when they have the majority. The leading House democrats all have their hands in this one from way back.
Posted by: enrique | September 29, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
We have to admit that we are in a propaganda war. This is not the sort of deal where some one is trying to sell cigarettes or oldmobiles, this is the type of propaganda war that one would find in Germany in the 30s. The news media and the non-news media like Jon Stewart can say anything they want with complete impunity.
In all of this propagana there is no penalty for lying.
This seems to be a very dangerous ground given that the electorate is so divided.
Posted by: lately | September 29, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
It’s not the perfect bill and maybe we are spending to much and bailing out corporate greed. However doing nothing is like waiting out the storm and hoping for the best.
I don’t want to gamble with our economy and I’m really appalled what the congress did today.
Both candidates did a lousy job. Obama did not take enough initiative and McCain was playing desperate stunts.
If this BS keeps going on, I’m really considering of transferring my savings to a save destination, maybe the Bank of China. Then take a vacation for the next 5 years since our economy will be in ruins and our dollar will not be worth anything.
Posted by: CLabs | September 29, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
“The Democrats needed ZERO republican votes.”
Noway you can get away with these cheap shots. It’s a republican bill made by a republican president.
The democrats demanded the republicans must take their part of the responsibility.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
The last 8 years of lunatic policies by Bush, Cheney et al. that has brought America to it’s knees via Iraq and financial collapse….
I remember when they said, ‘the adults were here in D.C. now’… MBA Bush would bring a CEO’s business guidance to the government… a uniter ..’compassionate conservatism’…..
poor, poor, Repubs were so offended by a speech and shot down the ‘bi-partisan’ bailout bill…. Rep. Cantor was so afraid of Palosi’s speech he was trembling while he held it in his hand….. McCain to the rescue … NOT!
it’s all unraveling, the crimes, the schemes, the lies, the corruption…….
“Special Prosecutor Named To Investigate Firings Of US Attorneys”
“Despite that lack of cooperation, investigators concluded the White House was more deeply involved in the firings of U.S. attorneys than administration officials had admitted. ”
“Republican IT consultant subpoenaed in
case alleging tampering with 2004 election”
yes sir…. the sound you hear are the doors to jail cells opening with great anticipation..
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
And where is Obama in all of this? MIA
Posted by: Brenda | September 30, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
is that dead moose I smell or is it the rank stank of republican fear ?
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am
Did anyone saw the interview McCain/Palin did with Kathy Couric.
Pathetic, Rome is burning and McCain is only concerned with the VP debate.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Give me break about free speech…
Palin tried to ban a book from the library.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Brenda
Your a broken record!
Perhaps the media isnt in the tank for Barack Obama can your mind get around the idea that perhaps the media like the majority of Americans can see that McCain’s an idoit and palins a fool!
McStunty and Pfailing
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am
lately
Your point makes no since your attacking a free press and conparring it to germany ????
What ???
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am
it was also so generous of Mitt Romney to give McCain all the credit this morning for the upcoming positive vote on the ‘bailout’…
whooooops…
maybe republicans should start a new website and call it….despair.com with the motto:
“it gets worse”
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
CLabs
Yeah I saw them it was like dumb and dumber palin kept looking at mccain to see if she answered right.. She looked like she was waiting for a treat!
mccain has no idea what he is doing he is just hoping americans a stupid!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
The Banks of the United States have reported 7 Trillion Dollars in bad mortgage debt. Let me ask all you geniuses out there what good is it going to do to have the tax payers buy 700 Billion Dollars of this 7 Trillion Dollar debt? Who knows how much more debt the banks and financial institutions have not been reported. Spending this 700 Billion Dollars on this debt is like throwing kerosene, dynamite and gasoline on a wild fire storm. It only makes the fire hotter and more dangerous and destroys those who fueled the fire just like giving the extremely rich this 700 billion dollars. The tax payers debt, the national debt will just go up and prolong the tax payers suffering, starving, and wreak havoc on their physical, mental and financial health.
Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
If the Obamabots think Palin is so dumb do you keep bringing her up? You guys are obsessed with her and her family.
————————–
Perhaps because she is running for VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?
And no one cares about her family except the republicans. We just care about her DANGEROUS lack of knowledge and her rediculously radical right wing views.
Posted by: Answer to your question | September 30, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
If everyone sits back and says “let Wall Street bail themselves out.”
Great, let’s do that and then when you have to work till you die, save nothing, find it hard to even get a home, much less save the one you worked hard for, then tell me what else we should do?
If this bail out is not the right thing,(and economists are saying it isn’t) then tell me what is the right thing.
Give us other options, you tell us what won’t work, but if you know what won’t work, then how can you know what will?
Does no longer matter what happened, it is a matter of what will happen.
Maybe if we all were more educated before we voted, this would not have happened in the first place.
Posted by: Bev | September 30, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
but a serious note for a sec:
It would be a good thing if someone, representing the American government actually took some time to explain to the citizens what is really happening in ‘plain-speak’… the best remedy for blind fear is knowledge and understanding….
I don’t think there are that many folks in Congress at the moment who really have a grasp on what’s happening… which is sad.
While I do believe the repubs reneged on an agreement with the Dems to pass the bill with some sort of bi-partisan support…. if the Dems believe the bill is necessary, change it, re-write it, whatever, ….
but have the courage to vote your convictions..
OK… back to my normal snarky self
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
“The tax payers debt, the national debt will just go up and prolong the tax payers suffering, starving, and wreak havoc on their physical, mental and financial health. ”
Bob4USA, go to your library and get some books about the financial meltdown in Argentine in 1999-2003.
An Argentinian friend fled the country because he lost everything. His savings were not worth anything. The only people that survived the crisis were the super rich, the people suffered for many years.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
McCain is not attempting to blame the crisis on the Democrats, or anyone else. He is asking them to STOP the blame game and start solving the problem. There is really no way he could do that without pointing out their obvious partisanship and finger pointing. I have heard so much from the Dems today about blaming the republicans for EVERYTHING. It’s their fault for EVERYTHING. And as someone already pointed out, I have yet to see anyone ask Obama to explain why he voted AGAINST the regulation for Fannie and Freddie that McCain tried to get passed, and what is the connection between the money he got from Freddie and Fannie and the vote against regulating them. And yet, you go round and round about McCain’s campaign manager getting paid — not contributed to, paid — for doing what he does. he is NOT a politician, he is a lobbyist, campaign manager, public relations. It really doesn’t matter if he worked for public relations for Fannie and Freddie. That’s NOT the same as what Obama seems to have done but no one has the guts or the decency to MAKE HIM EXPLAIN. I never knew so many people in this country were so willing to lie, twist, and convolve every single truth, the way I have seen done repeatedly regarding McCain and Obama.
Posted by: amy | September 30, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Here is the irony of this hole deal. The Democrats needed ZERO republican votes. Obama and Pelosi could not even lead their own party to pass this thing. Then they point the finger. Obama can’t lead the Democrats when they have the majority
——————-
Hahahaha. Great logic.
It’s a Republican bill from a Republican President. Obama had 2/3 of the Dems to show bi-partisan support and try to prevent economic chaos.
McCain “suspended” HIS campaign in a cheap PR stunt. HIS campaign manager was taking credit for McCain’s “bringing everyone to the table to get the bill passed” on Sunday. And “Maverick” didn’t even get a third of Republicans to support him.
Hahahahahaa
McLAME!
Posted by: Irony is right | September 30, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Bob4USA
there’s also all the ‘credit swaps’ and other arcane financial machinations that are not even being mentioned by the congress….. that from what I’ve read is even a greater amount then the mortgage and credit mess
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
What a hypocrite McBlame is. “It’s all Obama’s fault” and “Let’s not fix the blame, let’s fix the problem.” How can he say both of those things at the same time, and think anyone would want him to be a role model for our kids as President? What a jerk.
Posted by: Ken | September 30, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Obama has no clue. Didn’t last week’s meeting fall apart because of him? What’s YOUR answer Barack? Let’s all come together? Is that the best you can do? His friend Bill Ayes had some thoughts on capitalism at the SDS reunion last November. It’s interesting because when he speaks, you can actually “hear” the connection between them. Maybe someone should interview Ayers. Until then Obama can just keep blaming everyone else which begs the question-if he doesn’t know the real reason all this happened, how can he possibly know how to “fix” it?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 30, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am
McCain camp bars NYT’s reporter Maureen Dowd She been Banned from the mccain camps plane and asking mccain questions!
The company may have been more pleasant than that of McCain aides, who have barred Dowd from the candidate’s plane.
If the Obama campaign banned a FoxNews Reporter from the plane, I’m sure it would be the greatest crime against the first amendment ever committed. MoDo banned — one sentence, no explanation.
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Rex,
Very true there are trillions more dollars in those investments that the 700 billion will just add to the national debt.
Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am
The 7 Trillion Dollars came from one of the Senators who was giving a speech in the Senate on Saturday. Thank you Shawn for the info.
Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
RL in Illinois. Seriously? Bill Ayers? He went to his house once? Doesn’t ring a bell? Has nothing to do with the economy whatsoever? Nothin’?
How about McCain’s connection with Charles Keating, jr.? Charles Keating, jr. who’s actions are actually germane to the economy? That one? Those connections? Nothin’?
Hm. I’m glad you’ll be outvoted in November, if you’re actually from Illinois.
Posted by: MB in CA | September 30, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
“t. Financial melt down is inevitable. Let it happen now so true recovery can begin. Bush and his Cronies did their best to ram this 700 billion dollar pay off to the rich for making this mess down our throats. ”
Bob4USA, the super rich will not be suffering. It’s us, the people, who will be suffering. The economy in shambles, mass unemployment, dollar losing it’s value.
The super rich still got their 7 houses and 12 cars, they still got their wealth in dollars, yens, stocks, obligations and gold.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
To the people going nuts over a $700 billion buyout.(Which is starting at $250 billion initially)
I suppose you didn’t notice that 1 TRILLION was lost TODAY because the buy out wasn’t passed.
As for seniors, who’s retirement income is based on the stock market – I hope they realize who prevented the bill from pasing. This should play well in Florida.
The same people don’t care about the 1 trillion we are spending in Iraq for a war that has accomplished nothing. $500 BILLION in debt to China because of that same war.
Why don’t you get off your flag waving psuedo patriotic BS and realize if lending dries up, our economy is in recession. If nothing is done, it may be a depression.
Posted by: Milton Freedman | September 30, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Our House of Representatives listened to over 200 of America’s top economists and smart people of this country. They did what was right not what was fast and convenient and prosperous to the very rich. The fact that the House of Representatives rejected the bail out is awesome! Here is why. The bill was a just a band-aid that still benefitted the very rich and not the people. It was not a solution to the cause of the problem. This bill would only have postponed the inevitable to just after the next President is sworn in on Jan. 29, 2009. There are real solutions to the cause of the problems of the credit crises not even considered in this terrible fast paced 700 Billion dollar extortion bail out bill for the extremely rich people of this country and around the world.
In January 2009 the 7 trillion dollars in bad mortgage loans that the banks have reported will still be unpaid. Who knows how many trillion dollars of bad mortgage debt have not been reported by the banks. 700 billion dollars won’t even come close to paying for all of this debt. Financial melt down is inevitable. Let it happen now so true recovery can begin. Bush and his Cronies did their best to ram this 700 billion dollar pay off to the rich for making this mess down our throats.
Here is some interesting info. Bush and Chaney have recently purchased homes in foreign counties to for a speedy get away to live in after their terms are over in Jan. 2009. They didn’t want this economy to blow up on them while they were still in office. They didn’t want the blame for their very real immoral, unethical and most likely illegal actions. Yeah they got both.
One last fleecing of the American people was halted by our smart members of the House of Representatives who listened to the people and over 200 of America’s top economists. We can truly thank them for listening to us.
It’s time for millions of people to march on Washington DC peacefully in protest. The puppets of congress of the extremely rich are going attempt to pass this fraudulent bill again. “The only thing to fear is fear itself.” (President Franklin D. Roosevelt Democrat) Make the members of the House of Representatives and the members of the Senate know they were hired by all of us who voted for them not just a few very rich people. Make them know we are their bosses not a few rich families. We the People: Demand REAL SOLUTIONS FOR ALL PEOPLE not for just a very few extremely rich people!
Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
prominent GOP strategist said on Monday that John McCain handled his role in the bailout process poorly and would ultimately be hurt politically by the failure of the House of Representatives to pass the measure.
“To a certain extent, I think John gets hurt by this,” said Ed Rollins, a CNN contributor who worked on former Gov. Mike Huckabee’s primary campaign earlier this cycle. “He obviously, at the end of the day, said he was for it. But more important than that, he said he was the one who would bring them to the table and to a certain extent he will be viewed now as not being able to do that.”
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am
Republican leaders, who had pushed their reluctant members to vote for the bill, pointed the finger for the failure at a speech given Monday by Speaker Nancy Pelosi,
*****************************************************************************
The day’s loss knocked out approximately $1.2 trillion in market value, the first post-$1 trillion day ever, according to a drop in the Dow Jones Wilshire 5000, the broadest measure of the stock market.
*****************************************************************************
The next steps were unclear. The abrupt defeat left the Bush administration and congressional leaders scrambling to figure out whether to renegotiate the bill and introduce it again as soon as Thursday or to try other options. In between they’re taking a break because of the Jewish holiday (you must be joking)!
*********************************************************************
Posted by: foreclosure | September 30, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am
Bob4USA: I guess you didn’t notice how nasty Nancy Pelosi got today trying to get the bill passed-or her friend Barney when it didn’t pass. Maybe she has a get away house in a foreign country too? God love em. You don’t think this all has SOMETHING to do with the fact that people bought houses that they in no way could afford?
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 30, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
RL in Illinois
The meeting fell apart because of McCain. Everybody knew this. McCain sat silently in the meeting till the end when he decided to propose plan offered by house Republicans who oppose the bailout. McCain single handedly blew up the meeting.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
the irony of the story, if anyone remembers this, is that McCain claimed to swoop in and save the day, to show of fhis leadership. Then he took credit. Then it failed. Regardless of what side you’re on, he looks foolish. Barack stayed out of any grandstanding and gave McCain just enough rope to hang himself.
Posted by: sed | September 30, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am
I could explain this position, but it seems obvious: anyone who would vote for McCain at this point is a jackass. It just doesn’t get any more surreal.
Posted by: pretzelcuatl | September 30, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
I’m a Democrat, and I applaud the Republicans who led the opposition to Bush’s bailout bill, and the Democrats who joined them. Bush simply has no credibility, and unless some smart person sits down and explains exactly what’ll happen if we don’t pass the bailout now, and why, I think Congress should take the time to properly consider the matter. This seemed like another of Bush’s attempts to use fear to grab more power and money with no oversight. I’m relived someone finally stood up to this fearmongering, though I never thought it would be the GOP. And as for McCain, how pathetic is it to ‘suspend’ his campaign and try to postpone the debate in order to go back to DC to get the baoilout passed, then have it rebuffed by his own party? McCain seems all over the place.
Posted by: Tom | September 30, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am
Amy – Your comment defies reality. There is a diect quote in the article. In one passage, he attacked Obama and then in the same breath said that no one should play the blame game. It’s in the article – and if you don’t like that one, read AP.
What I would like to know is not what McCain is saying – but what he is actually doing. Do you think he’ll be hurt by this the way the vast majority of Americans will be? Guess again. His very, very close friend Phil Gramm, and top economic advisor, now is a financial advisor for the very, very rich. Do you think the McCains took a hit when the market lost a trillion? Do you think they’ll take another hit tomorrow? Or Wednesday? Or do you think their friend Phil has their funds wrapped up safe and tight – far away from Wall Street? If John McCain still has a straight talk express – he’ll be willing to tell us. But that was many, many years ago.
Posted by: mara | September 30, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
RL in Illinois
the mortgage part of the crisis is the least of the problem,and it’s not as simple as folks ‘living beyond their means’… those are assets whose value will have be sorted, determined and then they may be disposed of in a similar way the Resolution Trust Co. did with the Savings & Loans properties and banks during the late 1980′s…
the credit problem and all the various strange financial instruments are the real problem and are the most serious….
the credit problem if not addressed soon, could bring the economy into a severe recession…… the strange financial stuff, like ‘credit swaps’ has a greater financial liability than the mortgage and bailouts combined.
There is probably a lot more that we don’t know about.
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Bill Kristol: McCain Appears Headed For Defeat
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Tom,
If we don’t pass the bailout the whole world be in a deep recession, that’s for sure!
At this moment the European governments are bailing out their banks.
We are in a gigantic mess and some though measures must be taken. It’s not a popular bill, but there are no alternatives at the moment. Doing nothing is a real scary scenario.
The whole economy will be collapsing, the recession of 1992 and 2002 is child’s play compared to this crisis.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Tom,
If we don’t pass the bailout the whole world be in a deep recession, that’s for sure!
At this moment the European governments are bailing out their banks.
We are in a gigantic mess and some though measures must be taken. It’s not a popular bill, but there are no alternatives at the moment. Doing nothing is a real scary scenario.
The whole economy will be collapsing, the recession of 1992 and 2002 is child’s play compared to this crisis.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Tom,
If we don’t pass the bailout the whole world be in a deep recession, that’s for sure!
At this moment the European governments are bailing out their banks.
We are in a gigantic mess and some though measures must be taken. It’s not a popular bill, but there are no alternatives at the moment. Doing nothing is a real scary scenario.
The whole economy will be collapsing, the recession of 1992 and 2002 is child’s play compared to this crisis.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Tom,
If we don’t pass the bailout the whole world be in a deep recession, that’s for sure!
At this moment the European governments are bailing out their banks.
We are in a gigantic mess and some though measures must be taken. It’s not a popular bill, but there are no alternatives at the moment. Doing nothing is a real scary scenario.
The whole economy will be collapsing, the recession of 1992 and 2002 is child’s play compared to this crisis.
Posted by: CLabs | September 30, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
You know it is really sad. I have never seen so much pure HATE in my life.
You know what is really funny though? You have all the loud mouth, egotistical, hot headed, in bed with Obama people everywhere being what they truly are… Loud and pure Evil.
You know what is Great about being Conservative? I have better things to do with my life… like spend time with family… enjoy life to it’s fullest… not hate every single Obama loving freak there is. Sure… I shreak every time I see a little bumper sticker saying Obama on it with his very weird VP Biden… but then I just shake it off and think to myself that maybe that person just didn’t have a good childhood… and I just feel bad for them.
You know what else is great? And this is the point. You guys might think you are winning… but guess what? Us conservative people are doing just that. Being Conservative. We are sitting back laughing at all you goons with nothing better to do but be LOUD and blame everything else on other people. It’s ridiculous. The fact of the matter is… in November when it is time to vote… all us hard working… relaxed… conservatives will finally get loud and you won’t have a chance.
Sorry Hippies!
PEACE and LOVE
Go Hug a Tree ;o)
Oh and by the way… Don’t you love killing babies… promoting gays… ruining our country with your cracked out views?
Oh also… did ANY of you fight for this country or are you just like your fearless half white/40% arab/10% black leader Obama and held little community deals in Chicago? Great work Obama!
Can you imagine that?
PRESIDENT OBAMA! What?!?! Are we in freakin Kenya or Pakistan now?
OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE
McCain/Palin 08′
Posted by: The Real American Bob | September 30, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
You know it is really sad. I have never seen so much pure HATE in my life.
You know what is really funny though? You have all the loud mouth, egotistical, hot headed, in bed with Obama people everywhere being what they truly are… Loud and pure Evil.
You know what is Great about being Conservative? I have better things to do with my life… like spend time with family… enjoy life to it’s fullest… not hate every single Obama loving freak there is. Sure… I shreak every time I see a little bumper sticker saying Obama on it with his very weird VP Biden… but then I just shake it off and think to myself that maybe that person just didn’t have a good childhood… and I just feel bad for them.
You know what else is great? And this is the point. You guys might think you are winning… but guess what? Us conservative people are doing just that. Being Conservative. We are sitting back laughing at all you goons with nothing better to do but be LOUD and blame everything else on other people. It’s ridiculous. The fact of the matter is… in November when it is time to vote… all us hard working… relaxed… conservatives will finally get loud and you won’t have a chance.
Sorry Hippies!
PEACE and LOVE
Go Hug a Tree ;o)
Oh and by the way… Don’t you love killing babies… promoting gays… ruining our country with your cracked out views?
Oh also… did ANY of you fight for this country or are you just like your fearless half white/40% arab/10% black leader Obama and held little community deals in Chicago? Great work Obama!
Can you imagine that?
PRESIDENT OBAMA! What?!?! Are we in freakin Kenya or Pakistan now?
OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE
McCain/Palin 08′
Posted by: The Real American Bob | September 30, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
CLabs
We are already in a recession. The bailout is to stop us from going into a depression.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am
Brenda: What in the world are you talking about? He voted for what in 2006? To prosecute all the members of the Keating 5? Against Phil Gramm’s deregulation bill (no, he voted for that). Against Phil Gramm’s credit default swap bill, which took down Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley and the market along with them (no, he voted for that). Against the war in Iraq, which has cost trillions and put us into hock against china? (no, he voted for that – he did vote for torture and against the GI bill though). McCain himself has said that he is against regulation. several times.
Posted by: mara | September 30, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
The real american bob
That website is racist, and your disgusting.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
There are no racist. Only those who notice race.
Posted by: Jenny | September 30, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
The Real American Bob
Your a disgrace to humanity !
SICKO!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
When Gov Palin was asked about a potential depression, she suggested Prosac.
Posted by: Economic Solution - Palin Style | September 30, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am
When Gov Palin was asked about a potential depression, she suggested Prosac.
Posted by: Economic Solution - Palin Style | September 30, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
MB in CA 1:06:41-That made me smile. Yes, seriously…SDS November reunion…same philosophy…actually they are great friends…Chicago will elect him, not southern Illinois…won’t carry Missouri where all my relatives live-big family…been here 20 years. Seriously, he has no clue, but I’m sure all of his old “friends” from Chicago are just waiting to help him out with the economy(Ayers)…housing(Rezko)…foreign affairs(Auchi-just to name one).
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 30, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
It’s amazing seeing all the Obama support on this blog. People are really lost sticking to their clueless partisan beliefs and backing a candidate that is more clueless than George Bush himself. The DNC is making the same mistake the Republicans made in 2000. Just like Bush, Obama is not to be trusted at all. Putting Obama in office would be the same as electing Chicago’s Mayor Daley as Pres., or if you don’t relate to that, stick an Al Capone in there.. Obama and his misguided wife are out for #1, not the American People. At least McCain has proven over and over he serves this country and loves this country. He is the best choice.
Posted by: dumpthehokeysh*t | September 30, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am
“McCain has proven over and over he serves this country and loves this country.”
Prove it without mentioning POW.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am
“By grotesque mischance, $700bn – the cost of George Bush’s Wall Street rescue cash – is about the same figure as the same President has squandered on his preposterous war in Iraq,..”
the ultimate
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Bailout vote out was the most amazing I think I saw in my life mike pence indiana republican voting with dennis kucinich. For days I have been hearing republicans talking about obama’s shady relationships with Ayers but why dont they tell us about McCain’s daughter who is a bangladeshi muslim Bridget McCain John McCain’s answer about Pakistan was appeasement, my brother has served in the 101st airborne in Afghanistan few years back and he was really pissed with a guy who calls himself war veteran rite now our soldiers are like sitting ducks on that border where those militants attack our soldiers and go back to there hideout across the border Obama’s rite McCain’s too old to get it. McCain should’ve voted for the G.I bill which he didnt Obama did.Obama also was the first to guy in senate to raise the issue of body armor for sufficient protection for the troops he also was instrumental in fixing the walter reed medical centre which was ripping veterans off including those who had suffered some sort of disability.
Posted by: Joaquim | September 30, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
CLAbs – “It’s not a popular bill, but there are no alternatives at the moment.”
There are alternatives, but no fruitful discussion about them — have you looked at any of the economist reports about why Paulson’s plan isn’t sustainable? Have you considered the number of Reps/Dems who didn’t want to pass the bill but were being railroaded toward a vote so the House could adjourn before the Jewish holidays? This vote was driven too fast, with too much unanswered, and too little support among the voters and the Congress.
Posted by: enb | September 30, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
What exactly, did Obama say? I dont recall him saying anything derogatory about McCain or anyone else during this time.
I am damn glad they didnt vote for this bill. It was terrible. Yes we can wait until a fair bill and not a blank check is given to Paulsen. I do wonder why there are not discussions of using some of the tools used during the great depression, such as the trade tax. Get the market to pay for itself, while slowing trading.
Anyway the last thing we need is more credit. I read several of you complaining about how we wont get credit…screw that. I am a responsible adult with children. I dont buy new cars unless I pay cash, I dont run up debt and I save for things. Offering credit inflates prices and moves things out of my reach for longer periods. I know some of you will say that inventories need to be bought on credit, but we can work that out with smaller banks and small businesses. This current situation has to end, and if markets are going to lose value because they were over valued then so be it. Dont try and write them a check to maintain status quo, rather develop plans to ease it down with as little damage as possible.
Posted by: jay | September 30, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
dump
McCain wants to double down on George Bush’s failed idea’s….
Obama is no george bush get a clue!
Obama will be the next POTUS!
get real Republicans messed the economy up and Dems will fix it under Obama!
Posted by: Alex Independent. | September 30, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
When the Republicans propose a better plan then the bailout? maybe I consider it but now they just don’t want to pay the POLITCAL PRICE for deregulation which is passing a bailout. “Which they are all oppose to.”
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
MM, McCain has proven that he serves his country by his years of public service which is a lot more than the 141 days that Obama served in office. The respect that McCain is given around the world is not because of a teleprompter speech designed to appeal to American critics abroad but because of decades of clearly demonstrated character and statesmanship.
Posted by: Jenny | September 30, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Amen Jenny
Posted by: The Real American Bob | September 30, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am
MM, McCain has proven that he serves his country by his years of public service which is a lot more than the 141 days that Obama served in office. The respect that McCain is given around the world is not because of a teleprompter speech designed to appeal to American critics abroad but because of decades of clearly demonstrated character and statesmanship.
What respect? He sat on his but in congress for 26 years. Doing absolutely positively nothing.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
MM 1:23:28 and you were there? Wasn’t it really because Obama just “took over” and nobody could get a word in edgewise and in the end HE blew up because he didn’t get his way? It would be real tough sitting there listening to a gas bag who doesn’t know what he’s talking about. Darned polite, I’d say.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 30, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am
Jenny
Nuclear Proliferation, Obama-Lugar, Ethics Reform, Death Penalty Reform, Education Reform, Health Care, Project Vote, Creating the largest political campaign in history of the U.S.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
MM – “When the Republicans propose a better plan then the bailout? maybe I consider it …”
- add insurance element rather than buyout
- change mark-to-market
- keep the bankruptcy rules as is without allowing writedown on the primary/1st mortgage
all recommended by the Republicans.
Posted by: LG | September 30, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
RL in Illinois
Everybody at the meeting confirm the story. Obama participated in the meeting, McCain didn’t till the end and when he did the House Republicans blew up. Every credible news organization has reported this.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am
From the very beginning, McCain has injected election-year politics in this bail-out. Now he wags his fingers at the Democrats for acting partisan?
Anyways, Pelosi attacked Bush’s failed economic policies. She could have blamed the Republican controlled 107th, 108th and 109th Congresses which blindly supported Bush’s cut-taxes-and-spend policies against their own instincts, but she didn’t. The Republicans should be blaming Bush’s policies too, since government has grown even larger under his control. Of course, they would then have to admit that they were wrong in the first place, when they supported him from 2001 to 2007.
Posted by: Paul | September 30, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
From Dreams of My Father: ‘I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. It was into my father’s image, the black man, son of Africa , that I’d packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.’
God forbid someone emulates Mandela.
Posted by: MM | September 30, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
I’d think McCain is referring to the dems (most recently Pelosi in the well) trying to put all the blame for the current crisis (not the vote) in the laps of the Republicans.
Dems up and down the party line – including Obama – have been spending a lot of time talking about how the current crisis is the result of failed Republican policies. Watch/read and speech/discussion about the crisis and the proposed bill. Surprisingly, Rep party leaders have spent little press time talking about CRA, Clinton’s support for the GLB, etc. They’ve been talking about how to make the “bailout” program better.
Yes, reps favor fewer regulations on business. But, it was reps who tried to strengthen oversight of FM/FM. Yes, reps can sometimes favor Wall St over Main St — but today’s outroar shows why — protect the financial market, and to a large extent you do protect Main St. No, there was no push among Reps for greater regulation as mortgage/credit issues surfaces — but were there any leading Democrats talking about imposing balance requirements, limiting CDO or CDS packages, etc?
Posted by: rep | September 30, 2008, 2:24 am 2:24 am
Those of you who are voting for Obama will be the same ones voting against him in 2012. Just like the idiots who voted for Bush. Yep some of you are Obama supporters. I thought so.
Obama – The DNC version of George Bush.
Posted by: Jenny | September 30, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am
Jenny Did McCain vote for the G.I. Bill?
No Apart from saying fire Rumsfeld[just as he said fire Chris Cox SEC Chairman]while Obama was the first to raise the body armor issue Walter reed medical centre again Obama took the lead where for instance a soldiers who had lost a limb in the protecting this country was asked to pay for services as well for prosthetics lastly McCain’s great experience can lead to our soldiers getting killed along the border with Pakistan his adopted daughter history his wife’s work in Kosovo Bosnia Bangladesh Republicans love blaming someone else but they cant get the job done.
Posted by: joaquim | September 30, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am
So in other words, because a little woman said a few harsh words about them, they screwed the bill and their leader, Dubya, to spite her?
If they can’t get along with woman, why’d they hook up with Palin?
Posted by: Markus Simms | September 30, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am
The Real American Bob:
how very republican, a few quotes completely out of context to justify nonsense…. well done
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am
Jenny: I’m really tired and I have to work tomorrow, but right now I’m laughing my rear end off. I hope your posts get left on. Please don’t delete her posts.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 30, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am
jenny:
you seem to have a certain specific action on your mind
Posted by: Rex | September 30, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
“Anyways, Pelosi attacked Bush’s failed economic policies. She could have blamed the Republican controlled 107th, 108th and 109th Congresses …”
Right, and she could have blamed “everyone should have a home” policies. She could have blamed approval of the mixing of banking/investment companies. She could have blamed congressmembers who protected Fannie/Freddie. She could have blamed all congressmembers for not listening to analysts who – in the past 2 yrs – were warning of imminent problems in financial markets.
And yet she didn’t. She cherry-picked the partisan points.
Show me where Republicans are pointing to any of the above en masse as contributing factors?
Posted by: rep | September 30, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am
Didn’t he say:
“Now is not the time to FIX the blame…”
not
“affix”?
He might have meant something else than you would assume had he said, “affix”
Posted by: eric | September 30, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am
I am writing this message to inform people of the injustice being perpretrated by Fox News against Barack Obama. For the past two weeks there has been nothing but negative reporting against senator Obama by the Fox News network, which is unfair to listeners and the candidate. This networks seemingly biased opinions are not of interest to us viewers. My concern is that negative reporting like this will influence voters that are undecided of which candidate best express their wishes. I depend on these news stations for fair, accurate and just reporting regardless of the outcome whether it be a debate or any other current event and if that cant be accomplished I feel that it is grounds for that station (Fox News network) to be boycotted until they learn and understand that those types of injustices will not be tolerated. If anyone else can relate to the unfair reporting of Fox News I suggest that you join us in a boycott of this news station. PASS THIS MESSAGE ALONG.
Posted by: D. Townes | September 30, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am
If Obama wins, it means hiring an arsonist to fight a fire. Since it was people like him whose racist agitation on behalf of non-credit-worthy borrowers would lead to the disaster we are in now then p;ay the BLAME GAME NOW
Posted by: deon won | September 30, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am
Lets start a race war against FOX NEWS since they are the only MAJOR news service to cast a critical eye on Obama to expose him for the fraud he really is
Posted by: D. Townes | September 30, 2008, 4:23 am 4:23 am
I remember 4 years ago Democrats ran on the promise of change. Did they do anything other than destroy our economy to win an election
Posted by: gee | September 30, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am
Obama is a elitist
Posted by: Micael | September 30, 2008, 5:30 am 5:30 am
If McCain knew how to fly a plane we could not even been having this conversation.
Keating 5 would have done him away if he wasn’t a “hero”
Posted by: Omentum | September 30, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am
McBush truly is a loser in every sense of the word. Unreal!
Jiff
Posted by: Jumpy Jpnes | September 30, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am
I don’t know but does anyone else here see a quantum difference in intelligence levels between Obama and McCain and in their thoughtfulness? One man has excelled through Harvard and the other, without His Father’s enourmous influence and pull, muddled C’s and lackluster performance throughout his background. Who can make more wise decisions. Another thing, doesn’t solitary confinement produce lasting psychological problems of a major kind?
Posted by: Hector | September 30, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am
..this is a small part of the grand stunt of the republicans. make things work for mcbush when everybody is confused.
remember he wont do any campaign nor attend the debate, until the bailout is passed at the congress.
and this is a bush + GOP + republican appointees proposal. So when the deal fell apart on the House floor yesterday, in no small measure because most of the chamber’s Republicans balked at voting for it, the McCain campaign worked to contain the potential for damage. The first defense was to go on offense.
lies! lies! lies!
blame it to democrats and obama
Posted by: eduardo | September 30, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
confused now?
NO mccain/palin!
vote for real change
OBAMA 08!
Posted by: eduardo | September 30, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Come on…don’t try so hard to make it into what it is not
The Dems (Pelosi) tried to fix the blame right before the vote
He was talking about not fixing the blame for the original crisis
If half of you are half as smart as you think you are then you already know that
Of course you may be the people Thomas Sowell was talking about here
“that is enough for those who think in terms of talking points, without wanting to be confused by the facts.”
Posted by: BillB | September 30, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Since when was it Barack Obama’s responsibility to line up votes in the House Republican Caucus? McCain couldn’t even get anyone from Arizona to vote on this thing.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 30, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I blame the republicans.
I blame the republicans for having the ##### to stand up to bush and his cronies and tell em to eat it.
Who’s fault is it? It is the house republican’s fault that Liberty was allowed to live another day.
It’s the republican’s fault we may actually get out of this mess.
Democrats… Why don’t you stand up for what you believe in? This bailout is a joke and you stand behind it as if it were your own. Why would anyone want to pass this?
McCain is doing nothing more than political meandering. He and Obama have had no influence on this debate in the House and yet he wants to take credit for the great strides of progress? At least Obama is trying to do the right thing and stay the hell out of it. Time to move over and let the real experts have their say.
SAVE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
Posted by: matt | September 30, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
McSame…Mission Accomplished !
Posted by: Tom | September 30, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
McCain and the Republican’s to blame.
They got all of us into this mess and now want to throw $700 BILLION to their buddies on Wall Street again.
McCain is lame. He has not power even with his own Republican’s. He is a crazy, old bully who wants to fight even when he has to pick a fight. Doesn’t that sound like what Bush did with Iraq?
Republican’s should be voted out of office. No more chances to screw up our economy and blame others!
Posted by: Mark | September 30, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
How about REALLY fixing the problem and ABOLISHING THE FED?!
Posted by: sin_bad | September 30, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Mark, you’re buying what the Democrats and the media are selling. Research how the Democrats – going all the way back to Carter and confirmed as late as 2006 when the Dems shouted down any efforts to reform Fannie/Freddie – forced banks to make loans to bad risk consumers. Bad loans are at the heart of this mess. Lack of Congressional oversight through committees such as Barney Frank’s and Chris Dodd’s added fuel to the fire. Follow the money and see which politicians reaped the most from Fannie/Freddie and Lehman Brothers. Then come back and tell us how the Republicans caused this mess. Truth is, both parties had a hand in it and there’s plenty of blame to go around. And if you think Obama’s going to come charging in on a white horse and clean up the mess – note his position on the F/F and Lehman lists and remember – he’s only been in Washington for three years!
Posted by: marylou | September 30, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
The reality is that the Republicans put an ad out blaming Obama for the passing of the bill (yes, just before it didn’t pass), Obama blames Obama for the bill not passing.
It seems that they really just want to cover all their bases, and blame Obama for whatever happens, because really, that’s all they’ve got.
Posted by: E Scott | October 1, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am
How about voting only at the local level, having some of the highest voter turn outs, and not voting at the national level because we now know it does not matter how the”average” American feels about issues…neither party listens. Hit them both were it hurts in their political numbers…don’t you think some of the ways the $700 billion will be spent will hurt the people. VOTE LOCAL ONLY…THE ONLY PLACE YOUR VOTE COUNTS AND YOU CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE.
Posted by: Sue | October 2, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Its a proven fact that Democrats are to blame for this. Everybody needs to do their research then they can talk about this. We started going down hill a year ago. Two years ago is when the democrats took over the house and congress and the senate. Look where were at today….. They really run the country not the president… Do the research.
Posted by: Chris | October 30, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm