McCain Campaign Manager Assaults Grey Lady
McCain-Palin campaign manager Steve Schmidt attacked the New York Times today.
Asked about a story detailing how McCain campaign manager Rick Davis was paid almost $2 million by an organization that included Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, to hinder efforts to enact stricter regulations, Schmidt attacked the newspaper.
"Let’s be clear and be honest with each other about something fundamental to this race, which is this," Schmidt said in a conference call. "Whatever the New York Times once was, it is today, not by any standard, a journalistic organization. It is a pro-Obama advocacy organization that, every day attacks the McCain campaign, attacks Sen. McCain, attacks Gov. Palin, and excuses Sen. Obama."
Schmidt said that "there’s no level of public vetting with regard to Sen. Obama’s record, his background, his past statements. There’s no level of outrage directed at his deceitful ads. This is an organization that is completely, totally, 150 percent in the tank for the Democratic candidate, which is their prerogative to be. But let’s not be dishonest and call it something other than what it is."
Schmidt added that "everything that is read in the New York Times that attacks this campaign should be evaluated by the American people from that perspective: that it is an organization that has made a decision to cast aside its journalistic integrity and tradition, to advocate for the defeat of one candidate — in this case, John McCain — and to advocate for the election of the other candidate, Barack Obama."
You can listen to the call HERE.
Obama spox Bill Burton took issue with the notion that the Times has not vetted Obama, sending out a list of stories the Times has written about the Democratic presidential nominee, and writing:
"# of probing stories the NY Times has written over the course of the campaign about Barack Obama, his life, his religion, his childhood, his politics, his time in the state Senate, his time in the U.S. Senate, his family, his religion, his friends, his fundraising and all other manner of associations: more than 40…
"# of stories the NY Times has written over the course of the campaign about the last major financial regulatory crisis, resulting in a huge bailout, and which John McCain was centrally involved in with his political godfather Charles Keating: 0."
- jpt
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
From your headline I thought there was a brawl. Jake, please, try harder next time.
Posted by: Kitty | September 22, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Brooklyn Democrat,
Why limit it to Davis? Charlie Black and some 2 DOZEN other McCain campaign staff have lobbied for or continue to lobby for Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.
Hypocrisy, thy name Is McCain.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
just the facts maam
Posted by: votor | September 22, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Oh, come on. Everybody knows the NYT hasn’t gone any farther vetting Obama than pretending that they have. The wool is being pulled over Obama supporters eyes, but the rest of us see very clearly.
Posted by: Kitty | September 22, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Republicans do no wrong, everything is peachy keen in America today…. the fundamentals are great….. Bush & Cheney wonderful leaders for the Republicans and Conservatives.. embrace them and laud them….. everyone’s out to get them.
It’s a good thing they weren’t running things since 2000…….. wait…… they were…
Mission Accomplished !!
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Boy the McCain camp gets testy when a member of the media is so biased they report the truth.
Posted by: jim | September 22, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
“Let’s be clear and be honest with each other about something fundamental to this race, which is this,” Schmidt said in a conference call, “whatever the New York Times once was, it is today not by any standard a journalistic organization.”
I heard this before…
oh yeah during the last 8 years with…
It’s called workign the refs
and it worked on
wmd
Katrina
Mission Accomplished
judicial appointments
leaking a CIA operatives name and in essence blaming Russert.
closed door energy meetings
Abu Ghraib
ignoring our crumbling infrastructure as liberal taxing bologne
Presidential signing statements
our losing battle in Afghanistan
missing emails
wire taps
and the list goes on
same team
same tactics
same outcome
9th year.
Posted by: dl | September 22, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
We should all launch an investigation into Rick Davis’ organization, the Homeowner’s Alliance.
In addition to working with Freddie and Fannie, he also worked with an Evil Corporate Organization called Habitat for Humanity!
Expose Habitat Now!!!!
Down with corporate greed!!
Posted by: hippie | September 22, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Kitty must have had her tv off for the last year and a half.
lol
that explains a lot.
Posted by: dl | September 22, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Attacking the messenger is the oldest and dumbest trick in the book.
Jake, why do you guys waste your time listening to Steve Schmidt’s obvious BS?
Posted by: bob | September 22, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Put a lipstick on a pig, it is a pig, McCain is in the pocket of lobbyiest who has spent 26 years of his life advocating for deregulation. Period. He cannot reinvent himself at all. Palin was asking rape victimes to pay for their medical bills, she is against women even in case of rape, she cannot reinvent herself. God save America from McPalin.
Posted by: BKMC | September 22, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
wrong Schmitty,
It”s Palin that has never been vetted by anyone, including McCain.
question in point-
what would the MSM, republicans, or all of us be doing and saying if
1.any of the the Obamas were under investigation (been subpoened) for anything.
2.the Obamas(or the Clintons)had a pregnant teen daughter.
3.if Michelle Obama shadowed Barack through the state legislature
-don’t answer just think and know-
Posted by: watching | September 22, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
So the media should vet Obama but not Palin?
I disagree that Obama has not been vetted by the media. Remember the eternal Democratic primary? Remember Clinton’s campaign? Remember Rev. Wright all over the TV for weeks? Remember the 92-minute interview Obama gave last March in which he answered any and all questions about Rezko?
Give me a break. The McCain campaign just wants the media to rehash old trash from the primaries to help their candidate while at the same time wanting them to ignore the lobbyists running McCain’s campaign and their ties to Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.
In fact, McCain should be thanking the media for not getting into his involvement in the Keating Five.
Posted by: cincyr | September 22, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
I dont think the color of your skin should mater the problem with mccain is he turned into bush and sold his soul to rove and the lobbyists becuase he wants to be president!
the real problem is rich people thinking they are more important then regular folks
“All people are created equal”
and shuld be treated that way.
Obama is running for the people.
McCain is running for his wealthy masters/friends..
“A government of the people by the people for the people”
That sound like an Obama government!
And then a McCain government:
“A government of the lobbyist for the lobbyists paid for by the people”
Obama 08
Posted by: Aussie | September 22, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
mccain camp don’t care about middle income people and they are running a nasty campaign and they lable everybody who writes against them this mccain was the favoritte politician for times now all of a sudden timesis the one who backs obama? please give me abreak.
people have 8 years experience of the nasty campaign.you can’t fool us again
Posted by: mike | September 22, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
And the stories connecting Obama to Freddie and Fannie?
And stories about Biden’s family ties to financial credit card giant MNBA? How his son got a job straight out of college making $100,000 a year at MNBA, which is the top campaign contributor to Joe Biden?
How a top executive at MNBA purchased Joe Biden’s home?
Where are the stories in the NY Times and on ABC?
———-
But it was a waste of time of Rick Davis to show his displeasure with the NY Times. It is just provides more anti-McCain fodder for journalists to whine around about.
Look how much space this ABC blogger gave it.
Best to ignore the press.
Posted by: Zank | September 22, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
hippie
Have you been to africa ?
Posted by: Aussie | September 22, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Mission Accomplished…continues on..
Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.
In 2003, during the height of the predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863 National Bank Act to issue formal opinions preempting all state predatory lending laws, thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer protection laws against national banks.
The federal government’s actions were so egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general, and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new rules.
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
The number of probing stories the NY Times has written over the course of the campaign about Barack Obama, his life, his religion, his childhood, his politics, his time in the state senate, his time in the U.S. Senate, his family, his religion, his friends, his fundraising and all other manner of associations: More than 40!
The number of stories the NY Times has written over the course of the campaign about the last major financial regulatory crisis, resulting in a huge bailout, and which John McCain was centrally involved in with his political godfather Charles Keating: 0
Posted by: Bunch of Whiners | September 22, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
The McCain camp whining about the media is growing very old.
Posted by: Cindy | September 22, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Everybody I know is on to the media bias for Barack now. The brainwashing continues however. Journalism is DEAD. THis crop, not just the NYT but the whole CRop, including the veterans, have ruined AMerican Journalistic Values and public perception across the globe. The Media is the reason the rest of the world hates AMerica. The media brainwashed us to support the Iraq War. Then they blamed Bush for the failures when they, the media, built all the support for it. The media sucks. All of it, but CNN, NYT, MSNBC are the worst.
NYT now stand for New York Toilet Paper
Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Sussie
“political action committees”
Obama hasnt taken any PAC money the “and” is deceptive.
Obama’s FEC documents show he recived 10grand from pacs and gave it back!
Barack also recived millions of dollars from people who work for the Air Force are you saying they gave it for something shaddy ?
Posted by: Aussie | September 22, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Roger Miller
The NYT is Americas most respected newspaper Internationaly!
Posted by: Aussie | September 22, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Thank you, jB.
Posted by: hang | September 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Steve Schmidt is attacking everyone. I have been keeping a list – he called the mainstream media – Piranhas. Steve also labeled Democrats- Wolves. He even hates Marlyn Monroe and Charlie Chaplin and their dead the reason they are Celebrities. He hates musicians and I’m sure the list will grow in the next 38 days. Listen does America care what Schmidt says anymore? Hes shameless really. You see the Schmidts of this world rule by fear even his own people fear him. Fear can only take Schmidt/Rove so far. So New York Times welcome to the club. We are all on Schmidt’s list. I still think this is just anther distraction so Palin doesn’t have to do interviews or answer questions from the mainstream media.
Posted by: Betty | September 22, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Cindy: The McCain camp is not whining nearly as much as democrats believe say. Instead they are responding directly to ads and questions that are slanted and biased against the McCain camp. There is a difference between whining and defending oneself.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
McCain is jumping back and forth. Two many faces, are causing him to lose his idenity. His Tycoons have been in control of the stock market. They control the Oil, which effects our dollar. McCain is a front man for his Oil advisors. He is saying anything, without meaning, to be able to play the ‘outcome’, in his favor. Its a smart tactic, but it has a flaw. ME. I will gladdy report info. But you, the reader, must research for yourself, and draw your own conclusions. But be ready for McCain ‘shockers’. His Tycoons have a lot of money, and are waiting to buyout many, falling stocks. Unions need to watch their own companies stocks, before we all end up over-seas.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
“everything that is read in the New York Times that attacks this campaign should be evaluated by the American people from that perspective: that it is an organization that has made a decision to cast aside its journalistic integrity and tradition to advocate for the defeat of one candidate”
This is correct except for one thing.
The decision wasn’t made for the McCain campaign. It has alwasy been so.
He should have added that the NYT is an extension of Obama’s Chicago knee-breakers campain team….brought to you by Saul Alinsky.
Posted by: notafool | September 22, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
May we please talk about policies? Please prove that people on this blog have a brain and are not just supporting a candidate because of their party preference and therefore the other guy is completely evil.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
and obamas campaign received the 2nd largest amount of money from fannie mae/mack.
Posted by: colorado | September 22, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Cindy: The McCain camp is not whining nearly as much as democrats believe say. Instead they are responding directly to ads and questions that are slanted and biased against the McCain camp. There is a difference between whining and defending oneself.
—
I agree. And the McCain camp is whining. Instead of defending themselves on the facts, they are attacking the fact checker as biased.
Palin is doing the same thing in Troopergate. If she’s innocent, she should stand up and say so. Give us the facts in her favour. Instead, she (now the McCain campaign) attacks the investigation as biased.
I mean, what a wonderful strategy! Agree with me, or you’re biased!
Posted by: PJ | September 22, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Comment in The SMH today:
Sarah Palin, the woman who will kill America’s golden goose. The woman is an assault on America’s last chances of thinking for the good of the nation. I hope the American people will vote on a deeper issue than a hokum hick and her desire to shoot a moose.
Posted by: Aussie | September 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
“Throughout his political career, Obama has gotten more than $125,000 in campaign contributions from employees and political action committees of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, second only to Dodd, the Senate Banking Committee chairman, who received more than $165,000.”
But he has only been at this level of payment from the crimals at Mae and Mac for 3 years! Give him time.
Posted by: notafool | September 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
New York Times and MSNBC have hurt real journalists – like myself – who hold ourselves to professional standards. It’s one thing to editorialize in that format, it’s another to skew the news and withhold items because of some type of political agenda. Journalists are supposed to report the FACTS, not try to have an impact on them. They should be ashamed.
Good job, Schmidt.
Posted by: traci | September 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Blah, blah, blah. Notice that ol’ hollow point can’t deny THE TRUTH – which is that Davis raked in the major cash to lobby for Fannie and Freddie.
I guess THE TRUTH is 300% in the tank for Obama.
Seriously, the only joke sicker than this cat’s phony outrage is that cowed journalists lap it up as if it were news.
Please, spare us.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
The facts still haven’t change that McCain campaign manager lobbied for Fannie Mea and Freddie Mac to stop regulation for $2 million.
The Obama camp should hit HARD om this.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 22, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
The New York Times’ bias was obvious during the primaries, as well. They love Obama – although for the life of me I don’t know why – as does MSNBC. It’s funny because I always heard Fox News was the most slanted of cable news – I’m an independent – but during this election, Fox News has appeared to be the most balanced. While it has its commentators, who identify themselves as such, CNN and MSNBC have blatently turned into Obama’s cheerleaders. That’s not journalism; it’s American Idol-style reporting, and it stinks.
Posted by: no thanks obama | September 22, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
The Media is the reason the rest of the world hates AMerica. The media brainwashed us to support the Iraq War. Then they blamed Bush for the failures when they, the media, built all the support for it. The media sucks. All of it, but CNN, NYT, MSNBC are the worst.
—————
First off, the media just reported what the BUSH administration said was true.
No one expected that our top leaders would fabricate “evidence” and “intellegence” to LIE to the American public so they could start their own war. All evidence shows that Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Bush are directly responsible for the war – not the media. Those three fed the media and “leaked” stories to sell the war.
And where is FOX on your list? Do you really think O’Riley, Hannity, and the corral of FOX’s blonde haired, big chested GOP cheerleaders are unbiased?
The reason the rest of the world hates America is because of the policies of our current leaders that simply ignore international laws. That has nothing to do with the media.
Posted by: Red Red Whine | September 22, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
How the John (Bush) McCain groopies can blame the Democrats for the current financial crisis is beyond rational thinking. The Republicans have controlled Congress for the last 12 years (they controlled it when Phil Gram started the deregulation movement during the Clinton Administration). It’s only been the last 18 months that the Democrats have had the ability to stop the slide (but it was already too late). You also can’t forget the Republicans running the White House for the last seven years. It’s time to take onus for your own screw ups….the financial debacle that the country faces today is the result of McCain’s chief financial advisor, the White House and the Republican Congress. If you want more of the same then elect Mr. Flip-flop and his neofacist Bush-in-a-skirt partner.
Clearly, it’s time for a change and that change is Obama. We need someone who isn’t for screwing the middle class and is smarter than thinking that drilling will solve all our economic problems.
Posted by: algwriter | September 22, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
So why did the NYT write an article unfavorable to Biden’s son, Hunter Biden, just last week?
(“Campaign Says Biden Son Dropped Lobbying Clients”, NYT, 9-13-08)
Posted by: cincyr | September 22, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
no thanks obama- check out McCains gun policies, and then look at his latest ads. He is multi-faced, and is willing to say anything to win. Empty promises swayed me against him a long time ago. Playing the fence, is he? What happens when he runs out of fence? He falls down. Vote Independant, but not McCains Tycoons.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
To Traci, Micah, et al:
Apparently, Davis and Schmidt didn’t dispute any of the facts in the NYT’s story on Davis and Fannie Mae. (This would be “defending themselves.”)
If the story is correct and undisputed by the McCain campaign, how is publishing it evidence of the NYT’s “bias”?
Posted by: Saucy | September 22, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
To Red Red Whine….
Well said!
Posted by: algwriter | September 22, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Seriously, all of this weak-chinned whining about “bias” completely ignores the real story – Davis got paid to help these guys avoid regulation! End of story! How is reporting THAT bias?
Why don’t news mags remind us of McCain’s Keating corruption? They treat him with kid gloves.
And the “bias” claim is ludicrous. Schmidt just gets paid to fake outrage – WHY IS THIS NEWS? Apparently these people think we should just get news from McCain conference calls.
Also, recall that NYT endorsed Clinton and McCain in the primaries.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 22, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Saucy: It’s called saying “Why do you expect me to answer your question when you won’t ask the same about Obama’s people, especially with the same enthusiasm?” Plus I don’t care about the campaign managers. I care about the candidates themselves.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Another blown up story by McCain team to take focus off of economy.
Posted by: Lisa S | September 22, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Did he answer the question about the $2 million that Davis received from Fannie and Freddie or did he just go on a rampage and play “beat the press”?
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 22, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
McCain is up to his stubby little arms in lobbyists and poor little Rickie Davis has just been exposed for the lobbying creep that he is.
Posted by: Charlie | September 22, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Truthfully, outside of voting record I don’t pay attention to scandals if they’re over 10 years old. The Keating 5 took place in 1989. That was almost 20 years ago. 20. That is no longer news. Plus the media does not treat McCain with kid gloves. Outside of a very few journalistic orgainizations, the media for the most part either ignores or critisizes McCain.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Susie,
I think you missed the dollar amounts for the debt Fannie Mae and Fannie Mack were running. The $125,000 was a drop in the bucket to how much the companies were in the red. Saying that the donation to the candidates contributed to the collapse of these companies is like saying buying a bag of chips put a person into bankruptcy. These companies were millions in debt, which was due to poor lending practices due to deregulation.
Posted by: Mack | September 22, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Red Red Whine:
“…and the corral of FOX’s blonde haired, big chested GOP cheerleaders are unbiased? ”
What time do they come on?
Posted by: Woody | September 22, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Mikah, do you want to talk about the real Palin. She entered into her governess, AFTER Alaska came into money. The past Alaskan newspapers claim she should have a easy term with SO much money. She didn’t need earmarks, but still took them. Now, right now Alaska is in a serious debt. Her wasteful spending for bridges and roads to no-where, upgrading her family home, and a usless gym, has put Alaska in the hole so far, citizens are still asking how to get out. Read the alaskan newspapers from the past four years. It raises alot of questions, and these were written before we hated her. Just RESEARCH, and reach your own conclusion. Vote Independant.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Glad that someone from ABC is willing to bring up this point since every other media outlet (except for FOX news) won’t publish anything that goes against “the Chosen one” Obama. Never in my life have I seen Media bias such as I’ve seen in this race. McCain and Palin are being dragged through undescribable “poo” and the Democrats are loving it! This is a Shame and all who are participating will have to answer to a higher God someday…whether you care about this or not. I pray that you all just focus your negative energy on the Candidate that you decide you would like to vote for and stop all of this arguing. Bashing eachother is ONLY dividing our Nation not bringing it together. God help you all.
Posted by: jbarrera | September 22, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Nice to try to change the subject boys, but you’ve got no possible way out of ir.
Posted by: Tired Republican | September 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Also in the case of Keating 5, McCain was mostly exonerated from the scandal. Meaning he had little to nothing to do with it. Also, McCain grew from that experience, which led to the creation of the McCain-Feingold Act in 2002, which regulates the financing of campaigns.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Hey Liberals:
the last time Democrats controlled the presidency and both houses — they passed the biggest tax increase in history, failed to pass health-care legislation, failed to reform welfare, pulled troops out of Somalia in the face of a foe that resembled extras from Mad Max, and focused the arsenal of democracy’s attention on Haiti, of all places. The surgeon general declared she wanted schools to teach teenage boys how to masturbate. But people forget about yesterday’s problems.
Lets do some more of that. In the two years that the dems have controlled congress, what exactly have they accomplished on say
Healthcare?
Gas Prices?
Education?
Economy?
Immigration?
Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Mikah:
Baloney on “exoneration”. That’s according to his lawyer. Mac clearly interceded in a corrupt way for Keating. I guess it’s all OK though, because he ended up paying Keating back years later for all those fancy trips to the Bahamas.
Mac did a little strategic groveling, a little “I’m so, so sorry” shuffle, and thinks that’s enough. No way.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 22, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Rick Davis is McCain’s chief dampaign advisor and got over $2 millioni in lobbying fees from Fannie and Freddie.
That is news.
Posted by: m tobias | September 22, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
WakeUpPeople, because the presidency before already had a deep hole started. Read your history. To find out more about McCains multi-faced persona, check out ‘NRA Fires Away at Obama-Biden on TV and Radio’ McCain is gonna cry when Obama sees this. :)
McCain is really falling deeper, in it now.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Sorry, can someone point out to me where in Schmidt’s whining and crying he actually answered the question?
“Wahhh, waaah, the mean reporters ask such hard questions! Waaaah! read my press release!”
Cripes, no wonder they’re sinking in the polls. No answers, just distractions and whining.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 22, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
“The $125,000 was a drop in the bucket to how much the companies were in the red. ”
Dodd #1 and Barry#2 in donations received from the failed Fannie.
Posted by: Mack | September 22, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Steve Schmidt has denigrated the NY TIMES, one of the only real Papers of record. That is DISHONEST.
McCain Campaign Strategist, Rick Davis was a full time lobbyist for Fannie and Freddie getting over $2 million over five years. Over $30,000 per month.
THAT IS THE REAL NEWS.
Posted by: GORP | September 22, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
All Schmidt had to say was Davis worked for Homeownship Alliance which at times lobbied for Fannie and Freddie for various things, the result of which was … what? Did Congress pass any deregulation for Fannie and Freddie from 2000-2005? No. So in short, you could argue Davis was not a very good lobbyist.
Davis was doing who’s bidding? Would that be Franklin Raines? Yes.
So I just want to be sure I get this straight. It’s reprehensible to take orders from your client and lobby Congress, but it’s not reprehensible to drive a company into the ground and be sued for $215M by your former company!
As far as the article goes, it’s the usual “Dems and Reps agree, the Republican (Davis) was a slimeball” stuff but only Democrats are quoted. Big deal. Schmidt should leave the polemic rants to Rush and Hannity. It doesn’t play in Peoria.
Both parties are dirty in this Fannie and Freddie mess and we all get stuck with the bill. Just one more giant leap towards socialism. Hooray!
Posted by: Woody | September 22, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
And Rick Davis $ millions $
Now we know who is sponsering McCain. And fixing the polls.
Bad, Rick Davis. Bad. :)
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
OK, the response to the fact that the campaign manager for John McCain was paid to specifically hinder regulation that reasonably can be assumed to have brought us to the crisis we are in now. His response to that FACT is to claim that the press isn’t being fair. Not that it is not true, not that it is a distortion, he in fact does not dispute the finding at all. Obama has been grilled in the press, every rumor and gossip has been given a headline at one point or another. Rick Davis, the only ones getting picked on here are the people who now have to pay for your lobbying success. Mr. President, you should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself, asking that you use my money to shore up failed businesses and still want to give the CEO’s of those businesses multimillion dollar payouts for running those companies “so well”.
Posted by: Danny | September 22, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Let’s see. She cut earmarks down in half, which is an accomplishment. You can’t cut earmarks down from the highest ever to nothing in such a short span of time. Not possible because Governor’s do not write the bills and there is not enough time in the day to read over a bill with a fine toothed comb. Some things are bound to get by.
As for Alaska being in serious debt. I have no idea where you are reading that, but according to the head of the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Alaska there are significant budget surpluses. Estimates for early next year are roughly $5 billion dollars. Surplus does not equal debt. So maybe you should do your research. As for the gym, she got that built as a preventative measure to keep kids in healthy activities and provide measures to prevent obesity along with all the health related problems that derive from that. So it is a preventative measure and it is being used. Does not sound like nothing to me. You’re also looking at papers that want to hate her. She has only been a governor for 2 years and during that time she has had an 80% approval rating.
Do your own research.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Polls show that 15-20% of the voters who are voting for McCain have answered that they would not vote for anyone of color no matter what. This even includes a lot of the Democrats that were supporting Clinton. We’ve had Blacks, Hispanic, and Asians voting for White Caucasian candidates for years, but there is still a core of ignorant rednecks who only vote for whites, and none other. Sad isn’t it? Makes you wonder what went wrong and why so many still think this way. It’s almost like Hitler were still alive. It must make McSame very proud that a goodly part of his core constituency is represented by these types of individual, not to mention the Wall Street moguls, and the religious fanatical right wing.
Posted by: Jim | September 22, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Lets focus on the candidates and not their campaign managers, lobbyists, etc. Both candidates have them. In fact they both have so many that there is bound to be a handful. I’d be more concerned if we believed that neither of the candidate’s campaign personnel had done something that the population majority did not approve. That would make me suspicious. As for the hindering regulation. Both parties have hindered regulation. Both parties are to blame.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
If you bend to the Republicans you are no better than MSNBC. Think Olberman and Matthews.
Posted by: sb | September 22, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Woody – great point at the end there! This could be the end of American capitalism as we know it. This goes way beyond Fannie and Freddie. We could be looking at another Great Depression.
A real problem here is all the scapegoating going on. This is McCain’s MO – as revealed by his “fire Cox!” knee jerk and then the ridiculous ad. The financial system has exploded, and nobody’s a knight in shining armor.
I say vote Obama – cool-headed, intelligent, and deliberative is the only way out. And I say this as a moderate to conservative voter who supported Reagan.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 22, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“McCain-Palin campaign manager Steve Schmidt attacked the New York Times today.”
It should say: McCain-Palin campaign manager Steve Schmidt exposed the New York Times today.
Many of us already knew the NYT’s was just another arm of the DNC but Schmidt said it out loud. Bravo!
Posted by: Fallon | September 22, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
McCain and his campaign managers take all the cash they can get from whoever’s willing to pay them for their influence peddling. Then they attack others for what McCain’s been doing for years.
Crooked old goat (yeah…he’s OLD!) and his crooked campaign manager and his crooked Vee Pee candidate.
Liars all over.
Posted by: Karl | September 22, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
The Bush-McCain-Republican way of economics DOES NOT WORK. It never did and never will. The markets have crashed and burned, the American people are now footing the bill yet again in the trillions of dollars for the same corporations and Republicans who own them that ruined us economically. When will Americans ever learn. OUR money is now paying THEIR debts, that same money will not go to schools, jobs, health care, environment, Medicare, Social Security, you wait people, the worst is yet to come unless you elect people who know how to handle this, Obama knows, the Democrats know, just ask Bill Clinton, HE knew. We NEVER had problems like this when Clinton was our President, things were the COMPLETE opposite! Stop listening to idiots like McCain and Bush, they LIE LIE LIE, just look what they have done to our country! What more does anyone need to see? How many times do you need to be dropped on your head before you realize, hey that hurts!
Posted by: Democrats 08 | September 22, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
I cannot imagine what the outcome will be should Obama lose this election. I hope there are enough emergency vehicles with enough medic staff available and positioned close to the media houses in the tank for Obama. It is not going to be pretty!
Posted by: zeferimus | September 22, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Mr. America community organizer´s best friends: corrupts, terrrorists, delinquents, racists, millionaires, etc.
- Joe Reszko.
- Bill Ayers.
- Rev. Wright.
- Jimmy Johnson.
- Franklin Raines.
- Barbra Streisand.
This is really ´change´… for worse
Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 22, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
Mikah, Alaska has oil surplus, not money surplus. If they had the money, then why did she need to earmark for a bridge and road to no-where? I guess the Alaskan governments check book must by a lie, or some kind of polar bear cover-up. There are several Alaskan newspapers, including Wasilas, that have complained about a debt. I wonder why? I Know why. Palin works there. Read them for youself.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Yeah, the NYT stories on BO were tough all right…
-In Law School, Obama Found Political Voice [New York Times, 1/28/07]
-Charisma and a Search for Self In Obama’s Hawaii Childhood [New York Times, 3/17/07]
-After 2000 Loss, Obama Built Donor Network From Roots Up [New York Times, 4/3/07]
-In Illinois, Obama Proved Pragmatic and Shrewd. [New York Times, 7/30/07]
-Loyal Network Backs Obama After His Help. [New York Times, 10/1/07]
-Obama Looks to Lessons From Chicago in His National Education Plan [New York Times, 9/10/08]
Posted by: Irish Gal | September 22, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Mr. POW’s community of corrupt Republicans
Gramm – the father or modern day deregulation, famously called Americans whiners.
Scheunemann – McCain’s foreign policy adviser who just happened to be a registered foreign agent in charge of lobbying for the government of Georgia.
Black – huge lobbyist for Fannie Mae and once sounded hopeful for a terrorist attack on US soil, musing that is would help McCain’s campaign.
Rick Davis – lobbyist for Fannie Mae.
And those are just people that are part of this campaign.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Stephen from Indiana, and McCains advisors are his corrupts, terrrorists, delinquents, racists, millionaires, etc.
Read about them too. Much more shocking. Oil Tycoons who ‘control’, the oil and morgage prices. Doesn’t that mean they may have had a hand in Wall Street? Read about them yourself, and vote Independant.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
McCains buddies have been pulling strings for years.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
You know what. Lets talk about Obama and his change. He wants to nearly double the capital gains tax. That will force more corporations to go belly-up, which means more tax dollars being used to bail them out. These businesses can’t fail because if they do a significant portion of the population will become unemployed, go on welfare, and make this country spiral into another Great Depression. Outside the corporations, capital gains also includes those who sell a house for more than what they paid for it (that includes many low and middle income homeowners). It also adversely affects those drawing on money from their 401k retirement funds. So he wants to take twice the money from senior citizens.
Obama also wants to increase income tax on those who make over $250,000 per year. Well, this adversely affects small business owners (23 million Americans) who employ 70% of the U.S. workforce. Higher taxes equals less money to invest or pay workers. Most small companies also do not make a profit the first few years and then when they do the profits go to paying off loans. Well, entrepreneurs are going to think twice if taxes go up.
Also according to basic economics part of the tax burden is placed on consumers. So this tax will also increase the cost of food and other essential products. If that burden is too high on the consumer, the small business will fail. Leaving many low and middle income workers unemployed and worse off than they were before. Also, those who make $250,000 also pay 60% of their income in taxes. Leaving them with only $100,000. These people have mortgages, kids in college (with no financial aid), retirement funds, etc.
Energy: Obama opposes drilling for oil. Well that means fuel prices will remain high and go higher. This affects low to middle income workers trying to go to work or heat their homes. Here is where you say, “but oil damages the environment and is not a long term solution. We need hybrid and hydrogen cars.” Well, oil may go away in the future, but for now, the technology for hybrid or hydrogen cars is not here yet. It takes a while to invent those new green technologies and at great expense. Once they are invented, the price on those technologies are sky high and it takes time for those technologies to become affordable to main stream America. As for the environment, supposedly the most green state is California. What they don’t tell you is California has a lot of their energy shipped from a huge coal factory in Wyoming. Proof that Green can only go so far in meeting the needs of Americans. Now you say: “But oil is not the solution.” No it is not THE solution. But it is part of the solution. It is estimated that even if we put everything into renewables over the next 5 years. At a reasonable estimate of where the technology will likely be, we will only be able to supply 20% of current 2008 demand. Clearly not enough. Obama also opposes nuclear energy. He says there is some hope and he is willing to put nuclear plants in, but he is not ready. Yet Europe has cheap energy because they invest much into nuclear energy. Even Japan is investing in nuclear energy. So Obama just wants to keep energy and oil prices sky high. This means higher costs to go to work, more money needed for heating, food, health care, and infrastructure. Food because of shipping cost and the increase in wrappers (plastic which is made from oil), health care because they depend on a lot of plastic, and infrastructure because they use a lot of oil as well.
Health care- “We need universal health care. Well the only way to get that is if we did something like the Europeans, where everyone even the lowest earner pays 60 to 70% of their income in taxes. The health care system over there is also not so great. They wait months just to get an MRI only to find that something is really wrong. Then it takes months to get an operation. It took me three days before I could get my MRI. Also in Europe there is a lottery based on zip code for who gets their prescription drugs. So those who may need prescriptions the most do not get it. In Canada, (which has a similar health care program), those people would sometimes rather come across the border to use our health care where they have to pay rather than use the Canadian “free” facilities.
OBAMA: Change for the worse.
Posted by: Mikah | September 22, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Jake Tapper, I just heard Al Quida and Fox News are talking about a November surprise. Are they they same group?
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Meanwhile Pakistan and Yemen have had terriorist attacks and there is a threatened October surprise on our turf….give me McCain as Prez, anyday!”
Bush is going to allow terrorists to attack us so McCain can win?
I’m as cynical as the next guy but you right wingers take the cake.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
NY Times Executive Editor, Bill Keller, says this to Politico in reference to this story:
“The New York Times is committed to covering the candidates fully, fairly and aggressively. It’s our job to ask hard questions, fact-check their statements and their advertising, examine their programs, positions, biographies and advisors. Candidates and their campaign operatives are not always comfortable with that level of scrutiny, but it’s what our readers expect and deserve.”
Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
“Bush went to Democratic Congress 17 times to addresss the Freddy Fannie situation.”
Bush hasn’t addressed Congress (Democratic or otherwise) 17 times period….let alone on Fannie Mae.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Mikah -
National Debt – 10 trillion dollars
Iraq War – 1 trillion dollars
Economic Bail-out – 1 trillion dollars
If you don’t think McCain is going to have to raise taxes, you are living in fantasyland.
Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
Mikah: My nephew was in Canada this summer and he said everyone spoke highly of their healthcare program. Not one complained. I am not sure where you got your information but I would more checking. Also, my niece was in London this summer and she had to seek out healthcare and she said it wonderful. It was all paid for and she got a great doctor and had no issues. I am a breast cancer survivor. I can not get healthcare. I am all for Universal Healthcare.
Posted by: beck | September 22, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Emma -I’m sure you would love a headline like that. Do you have facts to make him part of the ‘Obama team”? Otherwise, work on Palin’s stonewalling of her abuse of power investigation. We can’t forget the ACTUAL, FACTUAL headlines of the indicted co-chair of the McCain campaign from Arizona and Ted Stevens from Alaska…
Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“Meanwhile we can trace the Freddie and Fannie problem back to Clinton Adm. who thought everyone (minorities) deserved a house”
You mean when Andrew Cuomo was head of HUD?
You know the Andrew Cuomo McCain just proposed be head of the SEC?
The above is what happens when circular logic meets reality!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
The list of “investigatory” pieces by the NYT made me laugh so hard I fell out of my chair. That sure is “hard-hitting,” “investigative” journalism at its best. Those little puff pieces are a laughable joke, and Burton’s list in defense proves the point Schmidt was making. I’ve read all those articles, and the NYT is so in the tank for Obama it would be funny if it weren’t so sad.
Let’s face it, the 4th Estate is DEAD!
Posted by: Chad3337 | September 22, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
it never fails no matter who has been or will be the president. if anything goes wrong under any administration. there will always be someone who will blame a clinton.
question for the still blaming clinton haters
Posted by: jgaw | September 22, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
The McCain Campaign response to Politico pointing out errors in their complaints about media coverage
“You’re in the tank”
Ladies and gentleman, I present to you possibly the most immature and childish campaign to have been run for President…McCain Palin 2008.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
@ryan: “I’m as cynical as the next guy but you right wingers take the cake.”
Hmmm. In small slices. Do you support the Monroe Doctrine, Ryan?
See Venezuela. Russian Navy ships are en route as of today including the nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser Peter the Great, the anti-submarine warship Admiral Chebanenko and other ships. Russian Deputy Prime Minister Igor Sechin warned the US not to view Latin America as its own backyard. “It would be wrong to talk about one nation having exclusive rights to this zone,” and has accused Washington of being scared of Moscow’s “new world potential”.
A real paranoid would accuse the Bush Administration of calling Vlad Putin (sounds like a line dance) and asking him to arrange that deal with Venezuela just in time for the election.
Posted by: len | September 22, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
OK, so McCain is clearly flailing, whining, and slumping in the polls, but they’ve gone and done something smart that has me worried:
Posted by: Tungsten | September 22, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
@ryan: “You mean when Andrew Cuomo was head of HUD?”
Because both parties are now calling for heads to roll, the head trading game has begun. The Democrats are offering to swap Cuomo for Christopher Dodd.
It’s just the opening offer. Wait for one with better hair. It looks better on the pike.
Posted by: len | September 22, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Len,
Do I support the Monroe Doctrine? You mean the claimed US hegemony over the entire Western Hemisphere?
The shield with which we kept away imperial/colonial powers from Europe during the 19th century?
Ya know before our habit of meddling in South American governments ticked off the people who lived there?
Seems rather dated ion a globalized world. Kind of like the Soviets saying to back off all countries that used to be in the Warsaw pact.
Interesting you mention Russian/Venezuelan military exercises.
It makes one wonder when such an alliance got underway.
Could it have been when the US imposed an arms embargo on Venezuela in a childish fit because Hugo called Bush names at the UN?
Could it be that ban included spare parts for F-16s that we had sold the Venequelans?
Could it be that we also pressured other countries who we have licensed the f-16 to not provide parts to Hugo?
Could it be that Hugo then replaced his F16 fleet with Russian Sukhoi (with oil money we likely gave him) as a giant middle finger to the US?
Could that arms purchase have been the first of several (includ 100K AKs) that leads us to the military partnership of today?
These things don’t happen in a vacuum len.
Which is why having hot heads in the big chair is a bad idea.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
The Grey Lady is venerable no more; she’s on her last tank of oxygen, killed off by so-called “journalists” who are no longer able to separate their personal values and beliefs from factual reporting.
Posted by: Chad3337 | September 22, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
“Wait for one with better hair. It looks better on the pike.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 22, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
“Palin’s stonewalling of her abuse of power investigation … “
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 22, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Ryan,
I don’t know the full details, but I can bet the arms embargo to Ven. was tied to their direct support of FARC.
You know, FARC…a leftist terrorist regime that is bit left of Obama….I read the story last year of a liberal journalist who was captured by FARC, and chained to another person, 24hrs a day, for a full year. That’s liberalism, baby!
Power to the people!
Posted by: hippiechucker | September 22, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
hippiechucker,
When asking people to read an article, its best to check the source.
In your particular case, you reference an article written by a McCain adviser.
This adviser would have us believe that The Republican controlled committee in the Republican controlled Senate prevented a vote from happening.
Sorry neither the source nor the analysis pass the smell test.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“This [Democratic Palin email hacker] kid is going to jail … “
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 22, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Jake, are you and ABC worried that you’ll be “in the tank” with McCain’s campaign unless you start kissing up a bit? Because the last few posts sure seem that way…
As Joe Klein says, But it should be remembered that Steve Schmidt is doing this for two (nefarious) reasons: 1. he’s hoping to work the refs: if he complains enough about press bias, we mainstream sorts will cower, cringe and try to seek false equivalences between the two campaigns. 2. the more time we spend covering this nonsense, the less we’ll spend on the real issues in this campaign. Sorry, Steve. Not buying.
Posted by: cs | September 22, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
and before anyone claims any news org is in the tank for Obama, why hasn’t there been any review / coverage on Keating Five? relevant today?
Posted by: cs | September 22, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
McCain’s campaign didn’t deny it. Hmm. . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. .
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 22, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
…but it looks like he didn’t deny it..
Posted by: Daryl | September 22, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Republicans believe in states rights, until it interferes with profits.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
I know its not my place but really…
I cant believe any of you believe a word from McCains mouth!
We over here are laughing at Palin the Republican party has set her up on some play dates at the UN. LOL
After Bush twice you owe the world a smart vote at this election Obama is our preference but if not him vote Barr he is a real man with real ideas.
Posted by: British & interested | September 22, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
NYT – I don’t read that rag anymore – period! The age of journalism is dead! They should be ashamed of themselves!
Posted by: Beckie | September 22, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Even the Humane Society has endorsed a President for the first time. They endorsed Obama. Guess they don’t care too much for pit bulls wearing make-up.
Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“It was blocked in the Senate, sir….by Democrats.”
How was it blocked in the Senate when Republicans control the chairmanships of committee, have a voting majority on committees and have a majority in the Senate?
Can you explain how Democrats stopped it?
Actually can you even name a vote? Because the only action I find on it is that it was read twice, then the final action Ordered to be reported with an amendment in the nature of a substitute favorably.
Also remember the source on which you base your assertion is a McCain adviser.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Steve Schmidt is a loudmouth idiot. Its a completely fair question to ask the McCain campaign. Is there ANY question the press can ask McSame campaign without accusations of sexism or bias? The ‘Straight talk express’ derailed long ago and has become ‘Crybaby shortbus’.
Posted by: JoeShmoe | September 22, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Mission Accomplished… it never ends -
An emerging meme on the right, one that’s being championed by the likes of Neil Cavuto and others, is that the mortgage crisis happened not because of deregulation, but because brokers were pressured into making loans to “minorities and risky folks,” as Cavuto tastefully put it.
But guess who actively sought to boost minority homeownership? John McCain’s campaign manager, Rick Davis.
As The New York Times reported today, Davis was president for several years of the Homeownership Alliance, an industry advocacy organization formed mainly by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Alliance’s core mission is to boost the number of mortgages granted.
- from the alliance’s annual report in 2004, showing Davis at a Congressional reception praising minority homeownership “We have an opportunity in the next decade to increase minority homeownership and significantly reduce the minority homeownership gap,”
Davis is quoted saying here. “The future of the housing market rests heavily on the economic success of minorities. Homeownership is likely to grow faster among minority Americans in the next decade if all the stakeholders in the housing industry work together to make it happen. The Homeownership Alliance is working toward this goal.”
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
I don’t remember being more delighted by a group of comments by a campaign manager in my lifetime. the new york times is a complete disgrace. If the organization were an HMO it would be bankrupted every day it does business for serial malpractice. Barack Obama continues to get a complete free ride by what we pretend is American journalism. But, the good news is that at least 50% of the 8% of the electorate (those dear souls genuinely in the “purple” middle) who will decide this election, when they read the deceit the new york times every day poses as journalism they can see right through it, and nothing moves them more gingerly to the right than the serial unfairness of this “pro-Obama advocacy organization.”
Good jog, Steve Schmidt! Good, good job!
Posted by: Thank God for Karma | September 22, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Bush Approval Rating now 19%
Republicans, rejoice, admit your republicanism, embrace your great leaders Bush & Cheney et al..
stop running and be proud of your republican heritage….
Republicans:
- running the country into the ground since 2000
Mission Accomplished !
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
“Unless Chris Dodd is a Republican, you’re right, I guess.”
Dodd became chairman in Jan of 2007.
Shelby (R-AL) was Chairman during the time this bill came up.
“Besides, McCains speech is from May 2006….guess who gained control months later…yep.”
IOW, McCain jumped on the bandwagon fora bill originally intro’d in 2005.
That’s his leadership on the issue.
Alas, Obama’s bill (as in a bill he authored vs cosponsored 6 months after it was intro’d) for changing the mortgage structure was also ignored both times it was introduced.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
hippiechucker
so,… your boy shafts someone on Monday, and kisses someone else on Tuesday..
But Cavuto says minority homeownership is the cause….. how can FOX be wrong? they are fair and balanced.
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
hippie
re: ‘What are you going to do when he’s (Bush) gone, I wonder.’
rejoice, party, and have hope for the future when Obama’s elected President ! even tho’ it will take many years to clear up the mess left by Republicans……..
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
“Anybody know what Congress’ ratings are?”
Congress ratings always suck.
But in one of the great paradoxes of the American voting public individual Congressional approval ratings are always much much higher.
People are quit to blame Congress, a faceless bueracracy, versus their actual Congressional rep.
Though I do think its hilarious that Republicans are running away from the highest office holder their party has to offer like their hair was on fire. Shows the faith they have in their party and its standard bearer.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
hippie
I haven’t heard you embracing your republican leaders Bush & Cheney…
c’mon… you’ll feel better if you do..
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
“Barack Obama continues to get a complete free ride by what we pretend is American journalism.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 22, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
hippiechucker,
Did you think it was ok for banks and mortgage companies to refuse to serve people because of their color?
Do you really think that people who got mortgages 30 or even 15 years ago are the problem vs those who got their in the last 5 years?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
It’s interesting (troubling) to see how successful these parties have been at dividing the people of these “United” States. The simple fact of the matter is we are just pawns in this stupid game. God forbid if we the people actually took back control of this country. Keep in mind the people that you are supporting have a vested interest in keeping you divided.
Posted by: Bart | September 22, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Bush and the Republican Congress had a co-dependent pending spree.
Now it’s his turn under the bus.
Conservatism is a “Ministry of Truth’ word.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
We have an opportunity in the next decade to increase minority homeownership and significantly reduce the minority homeownership gap…The future of the housing market rests heavily on the economic success of minorities. Homeownership is likely to grow faster among minority Americans in the next decade if all the stakeholders in the housing industry work together to make it happen. The Homeownership Alliance is working toward this goal.
Rick Davis
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
I thought it was a well known fact that republicans don’t know what’s up; they could care less about news from unbiased sources. In other news, wasn’t there a recent psychology study that showed conservatives prefer to be yelled at and called stupid? They reject anything normal when presented calmly and objectively.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 22, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Well that’s proof enough that statistics lie.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
hippiechucker,
“Of course not…I’m not advocating racism in lending. I’m merely saying that credit qualifications should be colorblind.”
In theory, that would work. In practice, it does not. The entire credit system is based on factors that already plague people of color, such as unemployment rates.
All of this is moot, however, because the people that gamed the system used no doc loans to buy properties to flip. Most people do not know that side of the subprime market and believe all the mumbo-jumbo that it was just poor minorities trying to make home loans over their heads.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 22, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
“Then you have the failure of people to understand that rates are variable, and that they might go up.”
I agree with this. There was a failure on the part of borrowers to make sure they could afford the terms of their agreements. Many jumped into no interest, no money down loans. And when that APR went up, suddenly mortgage payments became too hard to keep up with.
The problem starts with a lack of credit education (something that has gone by the wayside along with civics).
“Hardly predatory, but caught alot of people by surprise”
Hippiechucker, you seem more than willing to educate yourself.
Check out predatory lending and what it entails.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
“I think he was talking about McCain paying women more than Barack, I did hear that somewhere.”
I was referring to the contact form but this attack is also stupid.
All it did was an average of the pay of the males and females in each office without any regard to the position they held.
The point is equal pay for equal work, not equal pay just for the hell of it.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Here’s a question.
Has Trickle-Down Reaganomics worked for a majority of Americans, averaged over the last 28 years.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
“Tax cuts stimulate economic growth”.
That’s not an objective statement though.
Its a political belief.
And really hippiechucker, you do not want to go down the road of which side of the aisle has dumber commentators.
You are a rarity amongst your fellow travelers for the consistent coherence of your argument.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
hippiechucker,
“Here’s an objective statement. Tax cuts stimulate economic growth.”
Here’s another one:
Tax cuts do not stimulate economic growth.
Here’s an objective question:
If tax cuts stimulate economic growth, why is the unemployment rate high.
Here’s another objective question:
If tax cuts for businesses stimulate economic growth, why are businesses requesting that Congress increase the number of insourced labor/why do businesses argue for unlimited H1Bs visas while the drivers of the economy (Americans) no longer have money to drive?
Maybe the last one wasn’t so objective, but who cares as long as I get you and any other reader here to focus on what’s really causing the problems.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 22, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Leonard Peltier,
“But the call was so rife with simple, often inexplicable misstatements of fact that it may have had the opposite effect: to deepen the perception, dangerous to McCain, that he and his aides have little regard for factual accuracy.”
Sorry I missed it! Check out CNN’s
“facts” every so often. The lean so far over backwards to paint the picture of objectiveness that they make up negative stuff about Obama in order to balance out the truth about McCain. Truly amazing to watch journalism go down the tubes for ratings.
Obama/Biden 08!
Ben Smith
Politico
Posted by: Common Sense | September 22, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Ryan C,
Predatory lending took on a new face when it went after the people that did not need subprimes. Subprimes were pushed by the banks/mortgage companies (not Fannie or Freddie) because there was greater profit in them. Again, some people were also pushed into subprimes because they could not afford to purchase MULTIPLE homes for the purpose of flipping. They resorted to no doc loans while they thought they could get good ROI. That dried up because American jobs that paid well dried up.
They cannot have everyone else’s cake and eat it, too! It is now time for the bottom up instead of the trickle down theory to get a shot.
Congress needs to take that 700B and distribute it to us masses. Consumers drive all businesses/markets. You can’t take away what drives us and then expect to make profits.
This is not that hard, either, so I’m not sure why Paulson is acting like he doesn’t get it. Maybe somebody’s got something on him.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 22, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
In the meantime, Jake, the only REAL story here is that McCain’s campaign manager Rick Davis was paid more than $30,000 a month for five years as president of an advocacy group set up by the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to defend them against stricter regulations.
You, as a journalist, should not be distracted by the GOP’s distractions.
Steve Schmidt attacked the NYT, but nowhere did he dispute the facts of their piece about Davis’ ties to the mortgage giants.
Kill the messenger… If McCain had his way he’d kill the free press on day 1 of his presidency. America’s own Putin.
Luckily he’s going to lose the electoral vote pretty badly.
Posted by: GOP = distraction | September 22, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Hippiechucker,
I’m not inherently opposed to Capitalism,
while it’s principal flaw is that it is a snake devouring its own tail, that is another issue.
My question was about Reaganomics, and while I know you will defend it to the death, it forced Bush 1 to raise taxes in spite of his campaign pledge.
Captalism can work well enough, but the idea that the richest are the fuel of that engine is the lie that we are now laying bare.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
McCain will try anything as his credibility has taken more hits this past week than a bong at a 70s college party.
Also, I don’t think they denied it.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 22, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
hippiechucker,
I am a realist in that I accept greed as a more efficient engine of commerce than altruism, and I’m not saying that I have an alternative to Capitalism.
It seems obvious now, at least to some of us, that taking away the limits to greed and allowing it to be checked by its own sense of altruism is as unrealistic as any idea that Marx had.
Prosperity during the Reagan years amounted then, as it has today, to making the people down the road pay while you claiming title to economic genius of the hour.
Somebody always has to clean up after the party.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
“I’m not inherently opposed to Capitalism,
while it’s principal flaw is that it is a snake devouring its own tail, that is another issue.”
Some flaw. Capitalism is the engine that has fueled lifestyles for billions that are equivalent to how princes lived a few decades ago.
But lots of smart guys just gotta trash it. they are so much smarter, you know
Posted by: notafool | September 22, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Spin, Spin, Bluster, Outrage – deflect and intimidate.
This is what a McCain (or should I say Palin/McCain) administration would be like.
Could the voting public be so dumb as to do this to the country in these troubling times.
Posted by: Sandy | September 22, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
“Realize too, if 70% of our society is consumer spending, having higher taxes all around affects our ability to buy those consumables, right?”
hippiechucker actually sounds like an adult
Posted by: notafool | September 22, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
I would think that conservatism by definition of the word, would have as an objective the conservation of a system that functions in equilibrium, where the children and grandchildren share in prosperity as much as the parent.
Conservatism is not conservative as we can clearly see.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
“Conservatism is not conservative as we can clearly see.”
Leonard is a hoot
Posted by: notafool | September 22, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Conservatism is a word whos ideology has nothing to do with conservation.
If you disagree with this then I may be a hoot but you are a loon.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
“you will see a nation tipping into decline I am deeply troubled to say”
keep working at it. You’ll get your wish.
It could happen in less than 3 years if Jimmy Carter get his second term.
For your fantasy: 14% mortgage rates, 21% MM rates, 12% cpi, Iran hostage crisis….but we did get the Community Reinvestment Program established. You know, the birth of the program that is now threatening to bring down the world’s financial system.
Posted by: notafool | September 22, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Best part? Using a Sept 13, 2008 NYT report about Biden’s son Hunter in the call as an example of why the NYT should report on Biden’s son Hunter.
Davis and Schmidt are actually less intelligent than McCain and Palin!
And they say the gods don’t have a sense of humor!
Posted by: kravitz | September 22, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
So the confirmed news story is that Davis and several other McCain staffers have been on the payroll to help de-regulate the mortgage industry for years, but the headline screams that the NY Times is biased. How long with the lazy media continue to ballyhoo the sizzle and largely ignore the steak?
Posted by: tdub | September 22, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
If you just woke up from a long sleep (like many years) and caught that one political party was ranting on and on about media bias, what would your conclusion be?
After McCain was the darling for so many years, now they are just another castoff from a one night stand.
After the media was used again and again by the administration on 9/11, Iraq, and many other policy decisions,
only now are they biased and pro Obama.
A nation of whiners indeed.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 22, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
9/11 • Iraq • Katrina • Financial Collapse
brought to you by Bush, Cheney, McCain and a cast of thousands of….. …
REPUBLICANS + CONSERVATIVES
the hits keep on coming….
Mission Accomplished !
Posted by: Rex | September 22, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
The McCain campaign simply does not want to be accountable or called out of the lies that fall so easily out of their mouths
Posted by: FromMyView | September 23, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
@ryan: “Do I support the Monroe Doctrine? You mean the claimed US hegemony over the entire Western Hemisphere?”
That’s the one. I suspect if you had been around in 1962, you would have been rooting for the Soviets at the blockade of Cuba.
Please, by all means, be sure that Barack Obama makes clear his displeasure with the Monroe Doctrine.
Posted by: len | September 23, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
Mr. Tapper, I could have sworn that I saw the list of 40 Obama Times headlines since Jan 2007 that Bill Burton used to rebut the McCain camp’s assertion of unfair coverage here yeseterday. Did you remove it or was it another website?
Regardless, a simple archive listing of NYT headlines for McCain in Sept. 2008 ONLY (just this last month) reveals these:
McCain Seen as Less Likely To Bring Change, Poll Finds (9-18-2008)
In Spanish, McCain Criticizes Obama on Immigration (9-16-2008)
McCain Barbs Stirring Outcry As Distortions (9-13-2008)
McCain Calls for Limited U.S. Role in Schools (9-10-2008)
An Adviser Molds a Tighter, More Aggressive McCain Campaign (9-7-2008)
McCain Sounds His Theme As a Fight For Change (9-5-08)
Old Friends in the Media See a New Side of McCain (9-4-08)
McCain Set to Make Iraq Gains a Chief Theme of His Run (9-3-08)
BUSH SAYS McCAIN IS CHOICE TO LEAD IN TIME OF DANGER (9-3-08)
Palin Disclosures Spotlight McCain’s Screening Process (9-2-08)
Response to Storm Shows Changes in McCain Campaign (9-1-08)
McCain Laboring To Hit Right Note On the Economy (9-17-08)
Study Disputes McCain Figures (9-17–08)
McCain Seen as Less Likely to Bring Change, Poll Finds (9-19-08)
Obama Attacks McCain in a Bid to Attract Hispanic Voters (9-19-08)
The New McCain: More Aggressive and Scripted on the Campaign Trail (9-19-08)
McCain Tries to Link Obama to Financial Crisis (9-20-08)
McCain’s Camp Tests Fund-Raising Limits (9-20-08)
In Land of Captivity, Interest in McCain Is Mixed (9-20-08)
Obama Criticizes McCain on Social Security (9-21-2008)
Loan Titans Paid McCain Adviser Nearly $2 Million (9-22-08)
Of Mr. Burton’s 40 Obama headlines since January-2007, these are the ones for just Sept. 2008, oh heck, let’s throw in August, too:
Delicate Obama Path on Class and Race Preferences [New York Times, 8/3/08]
Big Donors, Too, Have Seats at Obama Fundraising Table [New York Times, 8/6/08]
Is Obama the End of Black Politics? [New York Times, 8/10/08]
Obama’s 2003 Stand on Abortion Draws New Criticism in 2008 [New York Times, 8/20/08]
Obama Aides Defend Bank’s Pay to Biden Son [New York Times, 8/25/08]
Once a Convention Outsider, Obama Navigated a Path to the Marquee [New York Times, 8/27/08]
Obama Looks to Lessons From Chicago in His National Education Plan [New York Times, 9/10/08]
Interesting differences in headline content and style, no? Please go ahead and read the stories, too. It’s quite funny, actually.
BTW, let’s compare Biden and Palin, too.
Last 3 months, total headline hits for Biden equal 19, here’s a few:
Biden’s Record on Race Is Scuffed by 3 Episodes
Campaign Says Biden Son Dropped Lobbying Clients
Biden Releases Tax Returns, In Part to Pressure Rivals
As a Matter of Faith, Biden Says Life Begins at Conception
Biden Opens New Phase With Attack On McCain
The Myth of Biden v. Bork
Jill Biden Heads Toward Life in the Spotlight
Tasks for Biden This Fall: Travel and Attack McCain
Biden Book Is a Hit
Obama Aides Defend Bank’s Pay to Biden Son
Obama Chooses Biden as Running Mate
Obama Selects Biden, Adding Foreign Expertise To Ticket
Obama Chooses Biden as Running Mate
A Senate Stalwart Who Bounced Back
As Running Mate, Biden Offers Foreign Policy Heft but an Insider Image
Palin has a total of 59 (all starting at the end of August). Here’s some of her headlines:
Palin Gets Women’s Attention, Not Necessarily Their Support (August 31, 2008)
Palin’s Teen Daughter Is Pregnant New G.O.P. Tumult (September 2, 2008)
Palin Daughter’s Pregnancy Interrupts G.O.P. Convention Script (September 2,2008)
Palin Disclosures Spotlight McCain’s Screening Process (September 2, 2008)
With Palin, Special Needs Get Spotlight (September 3, 2008)
Palin Start: Politics Not as Usual (September 3, 2008)
Easiest Task for Palin May Have Been Speech (September 4, 2008)
Ending a Conspicuous Silence, Palin Confidently Makes Her Own Case (September 4, 2008)
On Center Stage, Palin Electrifies Convention (September 4, 2008)
Sarah Palin’s Speech: The Sparks Flew (September 5, 2008)
In Wasilla, Alaska, Friends of Palin Tune In to the Best Show in Town (September 5, 2008)
Alaska Lawmakers to Seek Subpoenas in Palin Inquiry (September 6, 2008)
In Palin’s Worship and Politics, A Call to Follow the Will of God (September 6, 2008)
The Scrutiny of Sarah Palin (September 7, 2008)
Parents of Special-Needs Children Divided Over Palin’s Promise to Help (September 7, 2008)
Readers See Bias in Us Weekly’s Take on Sarah Palin (September 8, 2008)
Clinton Stumps for Obama, But With Little Fire at Palin (September 9, 2008)
Palin Aides Defend Billing State for Time at Home (September 10, 2008)
Squad of G.O.P. Aides Prepares Palin for Interviews (September 11, 2008)
Palin’s Pipeline Is Years From Being a Reality (September 11, 2008)
In First Big Interview, Palin Says ‘I’m Ready’ for the Job (September 12, 2008)
Working Mother Questions ‘Irrelevant,’ Palin Says (September 13, 2008)
Alaska Lawmakers Vote To Subpoena Todd Palin (September 13, 2008)
Once Elected, Palin Hired Friends and Lashed Foes (September 14, 2008)
The Buzz About Palin Started Here (September 14, 2008)
Active Role for Palin’s Husband in Alaska Government (September 14, 2008)
Palin Plans To Visit U.N. And Join Protest of Iran (September 18, 2008)
Palin Invitation Rescinded (September 19, 2008)
Palin Will Meet With Kissinger and Foreign Leaders (September 22, 2008)
Posted by: Kristen | September 23, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm