McCain Campaign Plays Gender Card, Accuses Democrats of “Sexist” Attacks on Palin
“I am appalled by the Obama campaign’s attempts to belittle Governor Sarah Palin’s experience," said RNC Victory 2008 Chair and senior McCain adviser Carly Fiorina today in a statement. "The facts are that Sarah Palin has made more executive decisions as a Mayor and Governor than Barack Obama has made in his life. Because of Hillary Clinton’s historic run for the Presidency and the treatment she received, American women are more highly tuned than ever to recognize and decry sexism in all its forms. They will not tolerate sexist treatment of Governor Palin.”
Is attacking Palin for inexperience sexist?
The vice presidential running mate has served for two years as governor of a small state, than before that 10 years as a mayor of a small town.
Surely one could argue that the comments about Palin’s pulchritude, the questions about what kind of mother she is — those are comments that could raise an eyebrow if not ire.
But inexperience?
Here is the McCain campaign’s backup evidence of chauvinism. I leave it to you to determine which of the following attacks you think are sexist.
**
Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL):
Obama: “Well, my understanding is that Governor Palin’s town of Wasilla has I think 50 employees. We’ve got 2,500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. You know, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month. So I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute I think has been made clear over the last couple of years.” (CNN’s “360 With Anderson Cooper,” 9/1/08)
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH):
Brown: “She’s been mayor of a city half the size of Blue Ash and governor of a state with half the population of Hamilton County. … John McCain failed in his first big decision as a potential president. He chose somebody with no experience to be a heartbeat away from being the U.S. president.” (Steve Kemme, “At Picnic, Brown Slams Palin,” The Cincinnati Enquirer, 9/2/08)
Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE):
Biden On Palin: “She’s Good Looking.” “‘From our perspective the whole deal is how does the government help you get back up without getting in the way?’ Biden asked. ‘There’s a gigantic – gigantic — difference between John McCain and Barack Obama, and between me and I suspect my vice presidential opponent. And that is that –’ The crowd laughed. ‘Well there’s obvious differences,’ Biden said, beginning to ham it up. ‘She’s good looking,’ he said, laughing.” (Jake Tapper, “Oh, That Joe! (Number 4 In A Series) — Biden On Difference Between Him And Palin: ‘She’s Good Looking,’” ABC News’ “Political Punch” Blog, blogs.abcnews.com, 8/31/08)
Former Senator And Obama National Co-Chair Tom Daschle (D-SD):
Daschle Attacked Palin As Having “Absolutely No Experience” And Being “Extreme Right Wing.” Daschle: “Three questions: With absolutely no experience, are we ready, if necessary, to place our future in her hands as commander in chief and our premier negotiator with other world leaders? Are we comfortable in having a VP who represents the extreme right wing, including the advocacy of creationism and a denial of any human responsibility in climate change? What happens if Gov. Palin is found to have abused her office in the firing of a police officer?” (“Politico Arena — Palin Edition,” The Politico, 8/31/08)
Obama Spokesman Mark Bubriski:
Obama Spokesman Erroneously Attacked Palin As A Supporter Of A Nazi Sympathizer. “Barack Obama’s campaign, perhaps miffed at all the Democrat-is-weak-on-Israel theme, started striking back at John McCain almost as soon as he tapped Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin to be his running mate. Where the Dems are trying to paint McCain as more financially out of touch with people, they’re strongly suggesting that his Christian conservative running mate is no friend to the Jews. ”Palin was a supporter of [MSNBC analyst] Pat Buchanan, a right-winger or as many Jews call him: a Nazi sympathizer,” Obama spokesman Mark Bubriski wrote in an email.” (Naked Politics Blog, Accessed 9/2/08)
- jpt
Email
Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Pro-Obama?
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
Rick Davis also declared that this election was not going to be about the issues but about personality. Guess that we already know that McCain is going to go all in and dirty. Look who he hired – the guy who smeared him in 2002
Posted by: Kit | September 2, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
I knew they would play that stupid card. When are women going to realize, this is a non issue every single time someone is beating them. I’m ashamed of the men in the ‘grand ole party’ still using this crap. Get real.
Racism was and is still the only thing still playing on Hannity.
Posted by: nativegirl | September 2, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
The answer to your first question is NO. Experience is an equal opportunity bashing ring.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Obama made a mistake when he skipped Palin’s experience as a governor. Better do some damage control than denying it. You can make the same argument that in terms of experience, Obama’s management of his campaign makes him more qualified than McCain’s five years as a POW.
Posted by: Julian | September 2, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Again the McCain campaign is trying to use the Hillary playbook by going the screaming sexism at everything related to Palin.
Now who won the election? Hillary or Obama?
Obama did so again women are NOT stupid and this is just dumb.
Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Native girl; You must have just discovered HANNITY. That man is the epitome of a sexist and racist. Now Chris Mathews: A TOTAL SEXIST!
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
I like Sarah Palin, I think her daughers situation just makes her seem more in touch with the common person. I still have many questions about troopergate though.
Posted by: Peter | September 2, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Just pathetic. Totally pathetic. McCain and his campaign are sinking to new lows every day.
Posted by: debrazza | September 2, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Only Biden’s comments strike me as remotely questionable. And even there, I think it’s a stretch to conclude that Biden was dumping on Palin because of her gender.
It’s clear what’s going on here. They can’t blunt the message, so they seek to discredit the messenger.
Posted by: cdb | September 2, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Oh, for crying out loud. So, by the same token, their silly attacks on Obama’s experience is playing the race card? Just face it, republicans, her “experience” is ludicrous. Do you really want everyone combing through the minutes of the Wasilla village council meetings? Just wait…
Man, the hyperventilation from the right wing is telling.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 2, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Playing the gender card as an excuse for your bad judgment. It wont work McCain try another trick.
Posted by: krista | September 2, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Who cares how many people are under her GOVERNORSHIP. She is a Governor, Obama a Senator. He works on legislation, She runs a government. Now we are suppose to elect Obama because AXLEROD can run a campaign? Oh wait, this is one of his same ‘ol arguments as to how he’s the one for the job. Talk about treating people like they’re stupid.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Republican BS! It will backfire!
Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Governor Palin is in charge of the state that provides 20% of America’s energy.
Alaska is a VERY important state with regards to America’s economy. Palin is an Energy EXPERT.
Read it and weep.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
I’m a woman and I can testify that no sexism what so ever
Posted by: Kathy | September 2, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
I don’t think the news of Hillary’s brother going to McCain should be embarassing at all. We all know what was done…….
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Sexism or POW, the “vaunted” McCain campaign response to all criticism.
John McCain seems good at fighting the imaginary.
Fighting real problems or real foes?
He just hired a man who smeared his wife and daughter in 2000.
John McCain – Afraid of a Real Fight.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Its OK to questions Obama`s experience but when anybody that questions Palin`s experience is a sexist?
Nice try GOP. It wont work. Palin has zero experience.
Obama 08
Posted by: keith | September 2, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
I didn’t find any of the statements sexist..but then again i’m not a woman. Seems to me the McCain camp doth protest too much.
Posted by: welcome to the majors | September 2, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
McCain is in freefall
Posted by: jen | September 2, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Let’s put this to the American people:
You want a guy who is ready on Day 1?
Or a guy who has to die in office to get someone who knows what they’re doing?
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Saying McCain used poor judgement of choosing a VP is not sexism, saying she has no experience is not sexism.
Tell the crybaby republicans to grow up
Posted by: lmg | September 2, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“Who cares how many people are under her GOVERNORSHIP. She is a Governor”
Because being governor of New York, California or Florida is alot different from being governor of one of the least populated states.
She’s been governor for as long as McCain has been running in this campaign.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
WHAT DID SHE DO AS GOVERNOR?
obamas been in elected office for 8+ years
runs a campaign that is bigger then her mayor towns population, and his campaign balances a budget where she left her mayors office in debt
THIS IS INSANITY to claim sexism
whats SEXIST is using the SEXISM card to deflect a HORRIBLE PICK LIKE PALIN WHO WAS NOT VETTED
scandal scandal scandal
Posted by: bhrandon | September 2, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Keith,
No, actually we’re just enjoying playing the race/sexist card right back at you.
Not so fun when you’re on the receiving end, eh?!
Lol.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Peter’s got the “new voters” number…Superficiality supercedes the issues oh except the one about them having to go to war.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Michelle Obama is more experienced than McCain, Biden and Obama because she has executive experience.
She is the CEO of Chicago General hospital(Serves more people every year than the whole of Alaska). What do you think?
Posted by: krista | September 2, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
If this was obamas pick the republicans would be EVISCERATING HER
Posted by: bhrandon | September 2, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
bhrandon,
So basically you’re saying that Obama’s experience comes only since he’s run for office.
LOL. David Alexrod handles his campaign. Obama just goes around speaking.
However Palin actually has to DO something on her own as Governor.
Nice try though. Thanks for playing.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
-the fact that she’s being investigated by the State of Alaska on charges of abuse of power, involving SEVERAL instances where according the special prosecutor in which she may have been complicit, which are substantially more serious that she had first led the McCain camp to believe IS news.(abuse of power/dishonesty)
- the fact that Gov. Palin has taken $27 million in earmarks IS news; (pandering/corruption)
-the fact that Gov. Palin was the DIRECTOR of indicted Sen. Ted Stevens’ 527 and raised millions for him, IS news; (corrupt)
-the fact that Gov. Palin ran up a $20 million debt when she was mayor of a small town IS news.(misuse of authority)
- The fact that Gov. Palin was a member of the Buchanan Brigade IS news. (Anti-Semitic conservative, Nazi sympathizer)
- the fact that Gov. Palin is a member of Alaskans for Independence Party IS news;(sedition/treason)
-the fact that Gov. Palin is a NeoPentacostal Dominionist which is a church that preaches purging the Earth of all non-Christians by a specially anointed army of God (starting with the Jews), IS news; (religious fanaticism)
-The fact that as a teen Gov. Palin played a leading role as a member of said army (Joel’s Army or the Army of the Third Wave-which most Christian theologians consider heretical in nature) IS news….
PS: All of these stories have been broken by other major media outlets over the week end… so if any of this IS news to you, my I suggest a Google search.
Posted by: beck | September 2, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Gallup’s daily tracking poll just came out. Obama is up 2 more points and now has a lead of 8 points.
This is the 3rd poll to show him with 50% support of higher today.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
oh i’m so scared now…i can’t attack sarah because she’s a woman and mccain was pow. what do i do – how does obama win. i’m stumped.
Posted by: scared | September 2, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Desperation. They see the polls turning. Pathetic losers.
Posted by: HonestAbe | September 2, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Go McCain – call it like you see it, because we voters see the constant barage of sexism and racism and it is coming from the DNC nominee and his cohorts.
Posted by: Shelly | September 2, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Unfortunately Freida, the media won’t correct him, they’ll keep pushing his distorted “facts.”
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
bhrandon wants us to believe that Obama is actually running his campaign instead of Axelrod.
Lol. Hey bhrandon, Governor Palin actually has to RUN the State of Alaska. No paid guy to do it for her.
You guys crack me up.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
THIS IS NOT ABOUT SARA PALIN. THIS IS ABOUT JOHN MCCAIN’S JUDGMENT.
We have had two chances now to judge John McCain’s judgement:
1. The war in Iraq that costs $10 BILLION A MONTH, without helping educate our children, fix our bridges, or make the change to an economy based on renewable energy.
2. Choosing someone to be one heartbeat away from being president, without any consideration whatsoever as to the welfare of the nation.
Gambler. Hot-head. Reckless John McCain.
He send a team to Alaska to vet his VP until the day before his announcement.
Was John McCain thinking about the welfare of the country when he this choice? The question answers itself.
As for Sara Palin, it turns out that the first thing out of her mouth was a lie. You see, as the major of tiny Wasilla, she hired a Washington lobbyiest to bring federal pork home to her town.
And she SUPPORTED the “Bridge to Nowhere” and the Congressional earmark to pay for it when she was running for Governor!
Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Alaska has the 47th largest economy in the US, by state, so stop with the 20% of US energy thing already. Its a tiny tiny economy.
And I didn’t see any sexism there at all. I don’t think the Obama campaign was sexist toward Hillary, and I don’t think they are being toward Sarah Palin.
Posted by: markymark | September 2, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Making excuses for McCain`s poor judgment wont make it right.
Am loving this because its going to backfire big time.
Posted by: keith | September 2, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
There is a video out there of an interview with Palin discussing energy and what has gone on in Alaska (which supplies 20% of the nation’s energy)…
This video scares the beejezus out of the Obama team.
When energy comes up in the debate, Biden will be crouching under the table in humiliation.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Just for the record, Alaska’s FY2008 operating budget is $11.2 billion, and the state employs approximately 15,000 people. Those certainly aren’t huge numbers in federal terms, but they’re a good bit bigger than the Obama campaign.
Posted by: Jean | September 2, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Markymark, nice try though but oil & gas & energy happens to be THE hot ticket this year as far as issues.
Palin runs the state where 20% of the nation’s energy comes from.
Spin it all you want, but this is IMPORTANT.
You lose. Palin wins.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
These comment just go to show that politicians (ANY politicians) will say anything to get elected. The sexism charge against Obama was played during the democratic primary with Hillary and now by the McCain camp. It did not work with Hillary and I expect it won’t work for McCain now.
Unfortunately, the bigger issue of this election season is the fact that the “average” American get caught up in this political line of BS and falls for it hook, line and sinker. If the American electorate would recognize these games and did their political homework, we could have had the “civil” campaign that was promised by both candidate which focused on the REAL issues facing our country today.
Posted by: DrMike | September 2, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Basically Obama’s winning defense of lack of experience goes like this:
So Senator Obama: when did you start getting all this “experience” you claim you have?
“When I started running for president”
LOLOL.
You can’t make this stuff up.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
I’m appalled at the choice John McCain made for VP. I know having a pregnant daughter that is 17 is a famiy issue but when you become a national figure you’re not the only one being vetted, your family is too. Before all this is over, that poor girl will wish she could go and hide somewhere. Not only is she going to be in the spotlight, but her baby as well. What in the world can her mother be thinking. This woman is an opportunist and does not put her family first. I’m sure she knew when she took the VP nod that this was going to happen. How selfish is she. This just tells me about her character.
Posted by: Lois, California | September 2, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Am I the only woman who is emabarrassed by this woman? This is an insult to women everywhere that just because McCain picks a woman, I guess I must be dumb enough to vote for him just for the woman factor. I’ve championed women’s rights my entire life but she is not the right woman for this job. What is comes down to is experience and she is clearly lacking it coming from a non-populous state that runs things a little differently than the 48 states do. She is not a woman I would look up to. And if men want to vote for her b/c she’s pretty, then that’s real sexism. If they are elected, America will be once more an embarrassement and made to look like fools.
Posted by: givemeabreak | September 2, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
So then, only Governors of CA,NY or Penn would truly be qualified huh? You all made the same arguments about Bill Clinton in Arkansas and he has been the most fiscally effective President we have had in MY lifetime.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Nothing could be more sexist than the McCain campaign’s choice of Sarah Palin as a blatantly obvious ploy to attract votes based on image over governance, except their assertion that she should be held to a lower standard than other vice presidential candidates because she is a women.
Hillary Clinton attracted such fervent support because of her self-proclaimed experience. The McCain campaign’s attempt to sell Sarah Palin as a “token” female candidate to try and attract “female votes” is an insult to the intelligence of voters, and her use of Hillary Clinton in her speeches is an insult to the intelligence of Hillary Clinton supporters.
Posted by: Gloria S | September 2, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
This is the decision that will cost McCain the election.
Poor judgment. There is no excuse for this.
Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
“Well, my understanding is that Governor Palin’s town of Wasilla has I think 50 employees,” 0bama said. “We’ve got 2,500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. You know, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month. So I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute I think has been made clear over the last couple of years.”
—-
Can you believe this bonehead!?
When Bill Clinton ran for president in 1992, he was criticized that his entire Arkansas budget was less than that of NYC. I cannot believe the Democrats are using the same republican tactics to smear his opponent.
Besides managing your own pocket money is different than having responsibilities to an entire state. In view of the waste of 6 million dollars building his Temple of Doom on top of Mile High to create his image of God of Nothingness is ultra irresponsible.
Now he has the gall to mock local government executives of the entire nation, not only just his sexist behavior throughout the past 18 months.
Posted by: d0 | September 2, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Although I won’t vote for McCain/Palin, I’m not surprised by the Democratic/Obama/media supporter response. They were extremely dismissive and demeaning of Hillary Clinton and she is a Democrat. Why should we expect any better from the “new” Democrats when the opponent is a Republican woman. This Independent is so disgusted with the Obama supporters, I now classify them in the same category as the Bushies and most of the MSM. Obama could have had my vote this November, but the treatment of Clinton and now Palin for issues outside of the political spectrum have made sure that even though I won’t support a Republican this fall, neither will I support a Democrat. They are obviously not the party of all Americans.
Posted by: mhhunt | September 2, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Dr. Mike,
You’re right.
Let’s consider:
In McCain/Palin we have a foreign policy expert at the TOP of the ticket, and an ENERGY EXPERT at the bottom of the ticket.
With Obama/Biden we have NO EXPERT of any kind at the top of the ticket….and a guy who supported the Iraq war and was wrong on the surge….and that’s his foreign policy recent history.
LOL. You choose. Lol.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
The republicans are just like their policies they want the american people to vote for; crazy! This side show won’t fly either…John McCain actions speaks louder than their negative baseless attacks.
Posted by: leslie | September 2, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
A lot of women who are not voting for Obama, are not voting for McCain either. The reason we’re against Obama is for his camps flipping of the race card in the beginning, which in and of itself was a SEXIST ACT! McCain is playing Obama’s same game, except Mac is now offense.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
More attempts by John McCain to exploit women by throwing Palin up there as his get out of jail free card. The only thing sexist here is John McCain’s voting record like not supporting Equal Pay for Women.
John McCain thinks so low of women that he figured women are so stupid that they’d vote for him as long as his running mate had boobs. Well, McCain, you can’t just throw a blow up doll on stage and say “vote for me!” because that’s what her experience level works out to. She has no record. She is no Hillary Clinton. While Hillary Clinton was fighting for womens rights, Sarah Palin was entering into beauty contests. No, John McCain, JUST because she is a woman doesn’t mean that she is the right woman for her time.
This is not the move of a political maverick, just the poor judgment of the politically desperate and the President of the United States should never stink of desperation.
The GOP is not holding up their candidates to their own standards here.
Posted by: NoToGrandpaMunster | September 2, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Basically what’s coming out from the Democrats in the Palin issue is:
“She’s a woman. She should be at home with her kids. Stay out of the big leagues. This is a man’s job.”
Wow. Not the message you’d think you’d hear from the Democrat party in 2008.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
jo
judgment trumps experience in this case
obamas judgment is sound
john mccains… with the palin pick… obviously not sound
Posted by: bhrandon | September 2, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
It’s clear that the McCain campaign is playing the gender card. So basically, any criticism of Palin is because she’s a woman? This is insance. She is supremely unqualified.
Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
I guarantee if Obama were in Senate during voted to go to war with Iraq, Obama would be voted to for the war! Just like Kerry, Biden, Edwards and Hillary. ……. It shosws how his judgment always change….. follow the crowd expectations!
Posted by: Lihat | September 2, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Grandpa Muster,
So basically what you and all the others are saying is that a woman can ONLY be chosen if someone is trying a political trick.
That would make sense except for how Hillary was treated.
Nice try though. Go have a cookie.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Selecting Palin was the most sexist thing in this campaign by McCain. Thinking that women will be stupid enough to vote for her just because she`s a woman. This will backfire!
Posted by: krista | September 2, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
JO
what are you talking about, whats coming out from the democrats?
when did anyone say she should be at home?
why did obama defend her?
where is this sexism you claim?
you can not pin this terrible pick on the democrats, you can not pin this unvetted pick on the democrats, you can not say john mccain made a good decision with this pick…
his first judgment call as the potential president and the guy BLOWS IT
HE BLOWS IT
he gambled on a political decision and its blowing up in his face
Posted by: bhrandon | September 2, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
To a Repbulican, energy expert equals sitting as a political appointee on a board for two years.
She’s a “expert” on energy but has no clue what the VP does.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
bhrandon,
Yes Obama’s judgment is sound. That’s why he attended the Trinity Church for 20 years and made Rev. Wright his mentor. AND had political fundraisers in the terrorist Ayers home.
AND thought he could do this and run for president.
That’s good judgment? Lol. You’re kidding right?
Nice try but you lose BIG.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
“In view of the waste of 6 million dollar”
Wow you really must have blown as gasket when Bush blew $150,000,000 on his convention in 2004.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Jo: “Governor Palin is in charge of the state that provides 20% of America’s energy.
Alaska is a VERY important state with regards to America’s economy. Palin is an Energy EXPERT.”
According to the publicly available data at eia.doe.gov, Alaska supplied 263,595,000 barrels of oil in 2007 versus the lower 48′s 1,584,855,000 and imports of 3,658,701,000. Total American oil need: 5,509,854,000 barrels, Alaska supplied just 4.7% of it. And America uses more energy than just oil – that’s ignoring the electrical energy needs.
It’s been fascinating to watch people today consistently present this 20% number in a way that makes it completely untrue. I’m wondering where it came from. A carefully parsed talk radio rant? A talking points email that rounded up 14% of America’s domestic oil production to 20% of “America’s energy”? Careful selections of estimated reserve capacity balancing ANWR guesses against continental shelf guesses? Wherever it came from, it’s interesting how many people have been mindlessly repeating it, clearly with no comprehension of what they’re saying.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
bhrandon,
the question has been asked all over the networks.
Should she be VP when her son has downs syndrome?
How can she be VP, shouldn’t she be at home with her pregnant daughter?
Etc. ETc.
Nice try but I watch all the networks and cable news show honey.
I KNOW what is going on. You don’t.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
i watched the dems convention i saw the film on biden how he was a hero for accepting senator after he sadly lost his wife and child is he a good dad ?he had kids no mother but hes a hero then they wanna say palin is a bad mom?
Posted by: david reyes | September 2, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
jhw539,
The same folks who brought you Palin the energy expert (for sitting as a political appointee to a board) brought you the 20% figure.
The lesson? Republicans lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Jo:
Wow, you sure are employing some yoga moves — heavy stretching — in trying to justify McSame’s decision to go with the unvetted and VERY inexperienced an unknowledgeable Sarah Palin (I’ll give you some energy experience, since she lives in a state where every citizen benefits from energy revenue, it pays to be educated).
Were Senator Obama to have made a similar pick, of a woman with no foreign policy experience and such baggage, the Repugnants would be all over it, stumbling to criticize the Obama campaign for denegrating women by picking such an empty pantsuit when so many qualified women were avaiable.
Instead, we have Tucker “Knows No” Bounds twisting himself into a pretzel to defend the pick. And many surrogates practically speechless apart from the McSame talking points.
And that doesn’t even get started on her use of earmarks, her support of Alaska secession, her inappriate human resouces decisions and abuse of power as governor.
Wow!
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: jackt51 | September 2, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
jhw,
No what is FASCINATING is watching Obama try to compete with Palin by saying he has executive experience by….RUNNING HIS CAMPAIGN…
Hilarious. And by the way, Axelrod runs his campaign. He does nothing but make speeches.
Obama fools no one but the kool-aid drinkers.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Gloria S. You are so wrong. Hillary attracted support from the people who know her and Bill. We are the ones who put them in office TWICE. We became ardent supporters when Obama played the race card on them at the same time his adoring media was bashing her as a woman. We know a lot better than you would as to our reasons for supporting Hillary.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
bhrandon,
Then why didn’t you PICK HILLARY???
She’s READY. Obama is NOT.
Oh wait, he’s a black guy. You just wanted a cute black guy who speaks good.
NOW who is the foolish party????
LOLOL. Thanks you make my point.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
Palin is a right to lifer. Normally I think that a person who believes in the sanctity of life would express that belief in their lives. Palin boasts of killing bears and moose. She has a bear rug in her office which she is glad to tell anyone who would listen, that she killed the bear herself. Now she is engaged in a effort to have Polar bears and Moose removed from the “Endangered Species” list. She is an avid backer of the Iraq war; calls it Gods’s war, a war that has resulted in the deaths of over 41000 Americans and 800,000 Iraqis. She is an avid fan of capital punishment.
SO MUCH FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE!
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm
She was recently quoted that Hillary was a whiner!
How quickly the sexist card gets thrown.
Posted by: eddit | September 2, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Not only is McCain no longer a maverick, he can’t even run his own campaign….How sad, the Rovian’s have taken it over.
The McCain we knew in 2000 is LONG GONE, he is eing controlled now by the same people that have run this country into the ground the last 8 years
Posted by: Mccain-Politics first, Country last | September 2, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Meanwhile, all of Biden’s embarassing gaffes are all under the Obama Media radar. They didn’t let a single thing go about anyone who was for Hillary.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
From Josh Marshall
Todd Palin, husband of Sarah, was a member of the secessionist Alaska Independence Party from 1995 through 2002. That’s the information we just got from the Alaska Division of elections.
Probably not coincidentally, 2002 was the first time Sarah Palin ran for statewide office in Alaska.
Posted by: Mccain-Politics first, Country last | September 2, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
My question is, why is Obama comparing himself to the VP of the Republican ticket instead of the top slot? Apparently he knows that the Democratic ticket is upside down! And by the way, a 2-year Governor trumps a 2-year Senator anyday. Same with the mayor vs. state legislator. In Obama’s case, he had all the time in the world to make up his mind on the issues, then voted present or pretended to press the wrong button or now says “I didn’t support infanticide”. In Palin’s case, she had to make constant decisions where “the buck stops here”, took on her own party and has a wildly high approval rating. Palin wins hands down.
Posted by: marylou | September 2, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
McCain Campaign Manager Rick Davis: “This election is not about issues. This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates.”
Posted by: Mccain-Politics first, Country last | September 2, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
bhrandon,
YOU need to give it up.
All you have now is Palin is not ready.
Which makes our argument that Obama is not ready and he’s running for PRESIDENT.
Seriously. This is your argument.
You will lose and you’ll lose big. Trust me.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
I can tell you democrats that republicans are thrilled to death with governor Palin as VP. Get over it!! WE are happy and will back John McCain all the way to the White House! All your rhetric isn’t going to change that. You all go ahead and blog all your crap–the end result is we are unified-and are backing McCain/Palin2008–you can call it George Bush’s 3rd term—or whatever you like–we don’t care! WE WILL TAKE THE WHITE HOUSE AGAIN!
Posted by: b4uvote | September 2, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Of all things that Sarah Palin has done that upsets me the most is when she was mayor she tried to get the local librarian of her town to remove books from the library that she didn’t like. Not a committee or concerned citizen’s group, her. When this didn’t work she tried to get the librarian fired. People rose up in arms and Palin backed off.
As an American , and a lover of great books, I see this high-handed self-righteous act as just a step away from book burning.
She would blantantly attempt to control our minds and our access to books to force us to conform with her religous views by a misuse of power.Not in America!
It isn’t sexism that is the problem. It is Palin. In her case VP should stand for very poor choice. She is attractive but her ideas are not.
Posted by: Mc Mary | September 2, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
bhrandon,
Let’s see, did you vote for Kerry/Edwards?
Of course you did.
Edwards was a new senator with absolutely NO experience whatsoever in Foreign Policy.
So nice try but we see through you guys COMPLETELY.
Next.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Sarah Palin only holds a BA in journalism from the University of Idaho. No masters or post graduate degrees.
She learned how to look good on TV.
But not so much how to manipulate the media I see.
Posted by: kravitz | September 2, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
you republicans can flip this anyway you want
MCCAIN JUDGMENT IS NOT SOUND THIS WAS A POLITICAL GAMBLE AND NOW HES PAYING THE PRICE
oh its sexism
if obama picked her you all would crush her
Posted by: bhrandon | September 2, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Jv,
That argument would work except that they had two children they pushed into stardom AND even their oldest daughter was just as bad.
So that doesn’t work. Tell Media Matters to come up with something else.
Next. Lol.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
lol edwards had experience…
what is palins experience… go ahead ill wait…. no im still waiting…
yea thats right pta, mayor of a town of 5k and then a governor lol
who claims she has foreign policy experience because her state is near russia
LOL
cmon
jo
you are a failure
Posted by: bhrandon | September 2, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
kravitz,
And all the Harvard degrees in the world won’t get people to forget that Obama picked a 20 year mentor/pastor who HATES this country and who advocates BLACK SEPARATIST policies.
So again, you guys are weak.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
First executive decision by McCain was to chose a VP and he displayed poor judgment by selecting somebody with a very thin resume and a shipload of baggage.
How can McCain exercise poor judgment and still think he should be allowed to be POTUS.
He has to learn from Obama.
Posted by: keith | September 2, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
We really should put Axelrod at the top of the Dem ticket. He’s Shari Lewis; Obama is Lamb Chop.
Posted by: marylou | September 2, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Oh you’re right. Edwards had experience.
I think he was an EXPERT in Hair Management.
Lol.
Weak, weak, weak.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
Alaska is about as big as DELAWARE.
You’re right. Maybe Delaware is so small and insignificant it doesn’t even need a Senator.
Maybe Biden ought to resign.
Lol.
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Palin hasn’t sufficient experience to be vice-president. It is not sexist to point that out. It is sexist to choose an unqualified running mate and expect the opposition and the press to go easy on her because she is a woman and a mother.
Posted by: Alex | September 2, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
I can tell you democrats that republicans are thrilled to death with governor Palin as VP”
I’m happy to. For once the people will get to see the Republicans for the complete fraud they really are.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Rove’s only option now is to bash Obama into the gulf. He’s ripping out the last of his comb-over. That’s why Grampa McCain hired the guy who used racism to slime him in 2000. And direct donors to 527 seift-boat groups. Obama got a 6 to 9 point bounce BECAUSE of Sarah Palin.
Keep her JM! Please!!!!! Keep your poor judgement on display like Us Weekly in the grocery stores where the Hillary Clinton voters you wanted to snag will be shopping this week. Please Keep Sarah Palin on your trainwreck ticket!!!
Posted by: kravitz | September 2, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
You’ve got to be kidding? What Obama and Biden can challenge her experience because she’s a woman? The repubs will always be hypocrits. What a joke they’ve made of our country!
Posted by: Madcitychick | September 2, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Jo
Rev Wright fought on the frontlines in Vietnam but McCain only flew over Vietnam and was captured.
Why dont you talk about McCain`s two spiritual guides(Parsely and Hagee) who would not serve America but preach hatred against fellow Americans.
Posted by: Kenny | September 2, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Speaking of Edwards, how come the media wasn’t interested in pursuing the story of his illegitimate child back when he was still in the race – but they were all over Bristol Palin who isn’t running for anything?
Posted by: marylou | September 2, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
jo: “jhw,
No what is FASCINATING is watching Obama try to compete with Palin by saying he has executive experience by….RUNNING HIS CAMPAIGN…
Hilarious. And by the way, Axelrod runs his campaign. He does nothing but make speeches.
Obama fools no one but the kool-aid drinkers.”
My original post was stating, based on reality and actual published facts, your “20% of America’s energy” figure was a wildly inaccurate lie. Reality being what it is, you can’t refute that.
I’m not too interested in debating folks who just make up facts (who doesn’t seem to understand what an “executive decision” is either – I bet you believe Bush is actually on the front lines commanding the troops personally too). Seems a bit pointless.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
im coocoo for this coocoo ticket
mcsame/plain 08!
woot
for months i will talk about experience and judgment to lead and then i will throw out those tlaking points by poorly selecting a running mate who wasnt vetted and has no experience
then i will find talking points by saying she has more experience even though she doesnt adn i will say shes a maverick who oppsoes the bridge to nowhere when she actually supported it
and i will cheapen my brand by taking a political gamble instead of taking seriously my first task as would be president by pcikign this loser
lol
Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“Alaska is about as big as DELAWARE.
You’re right. Maybe Delaware is so small and insignificant it doesn’t even need a Senator.”
Alaska is gonna need tow new Senators to replace their corrupt ones.
Will Sarah Palin rush to the aide of her longtime friend and ally Ted Stevens?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Sarah Palin has approved 26 billion dollar oil-pipeline for a Canadian business which will hire Canadians and not people here in the United States and a very big proponent of drilling, instead of really focusing on newer 21st century ways of dealing with our energy crisis. She is NOT an energy expert she is an oil expert, so its still about big oil and more of the same.
Posted by: NO THANKS | September 2, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Obama is able to put together an excellent team to cause the biggest political upset in history. Obama knows how to get what he wants.
Palin? Obama`s campaign budget is even bigger than Alaska`s budget.
Posted by: keith | September 2, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
The Palins are nutcake secessionists. Which means they want Alaska to break away from the US and form its own country. See Jake’s other post on the side.
She is also a creationist christian. She is no longer a catholic.
Sarah Palin Has A Pastor Problem. Or Two… Harper’s Magazine. “From an November 25, 2007 sermon: “The purpose for the United States is… to glorify God. This nation is a Christian nation.” “From a July 28, 2007 sermon: “Do you believe we’re in the last days? After listening to Newt Gingrich and the Prime Minister of Israel and a number of others at our gathering, I became convinced and I have been convinced for some time. We are living in the last days. These are incredible times to live in.”
Posted by: kravitz | September 2, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Obama is saying his experience running for president qualifies him to be president – that’s what the quote says. And running a campagin budget is not the same thing as serving as at the executive level. Pallin has experience overseeing state budgets, healthcare programs, law enforcement, human resources, and other executive functions – Obama has none of this. If less than two years in the Senate (with more than a year not even showing up for work, but rather running for president) qualifies him to be president, well then I think two years experience as a governor, combined with mayoral, town council and commission experience qualifies one for the vice presidency. So yes, if you talk about Pallin’s few years of experience and don’t put it in context with Obama’s inexperience, of course it’s sexist.
Posted by: momobella | September 2, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Jo, if you had a pregnant 17-year-old daughter, would you think it was a good time to subject your family to the national press? I have a daughter that age. I can’t conceive of caring so little about her dignity, her privacy, her feelings. All this so we can have a VP candidate whose entire foreign policy resume consists of “Alaska is close to Russia.” I was PTA president twice. I could be VP, too!
Posted by: obamamama | September 2, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
david reyes: “i watched the dems convention i saw the film on biden how he was a hero for accepting senator after he sadly lost his wife and child is he a good dad ?he had kids no mother but hes a hero then they wanna say palin is a bad mom?”
You would prefer he what – stay home and live off welfare? It is how he’s done the job, the long commute home every night on the train to be there for his family, that is respected.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
i watched the dems convention i saw the film on biden how he was a hero for accepting senator after he sadly lost his wife and child is he a good dad ?he had kids no mother but hes a hero then they wanna say palin is a bad mom?
just as i thought you dems are the worst things are only good if a dem does it you should be ashamed of your selves imma keep on posting till i get an answer
Posted by: david reyes | September 2, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Obama was the one who stated over and over again ” they might not like me because I look different” as if who ever doesnt like him is a racist.
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
Hmmm, wonder about Palin’s pastor? Here’s what he says:
“But Pastor Kalnins has also preached that critics of President Bush will be banished to hell; questioned whether people who voted for Sen. John Kerry in 2004 would be accepted to heaven; charged that the 9/11 terrorist attacks and war in Iraq were part of a war “contending for your faith;” and said that Jesus “operated from that position of war mode.”
Posted by: obamamama | September 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Would McCain have picked a man with as much experience as Palin? No way. Her selection itself is a sexist move by McCain camp to attract women voters.
Posted by: JJ | September 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“Now Chris Mathews: A TOTAL SEXIST!”
Probably so, but what sex does he prefer is the question? I’ve never heard a straight male refer to a tingling up his leg when hearing another male speak.
Posted by: Inquisitor | September 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
“I see SEXISM very clearly because the horrible accusation is that she is being a bad mother or a could be a bad VP if elected. ”
OBAMA HAS DONE NOTHING BUT DEFEND THE FAMILY’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. YOU CANNOT BLAME HIM FOR QUESTIONS OTHER PEOPLE WANT TO ASK.
Posted by: mm | September 2, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
And all the Harvard degrees in the world won’t get people to forget that Obama picked a 20 year mentor/pastor who HATES this country and who advocates BLACK SEPARATIST policies
——
Jo, are we talking about the same man who left college to fight for this country? weak,weak, weak. Learn your facts
Posted by: Mike M. | September 2, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
marylou: “Speaking of Edwards, how come the media wasn’t interested in pursuing the story of his illegitimate child back when he was still in the race – but they were all over Bristol Palin who isn’t running for anything?”
The mainstream media were NOT all over Bristol Palin until the McCain campaign issued a press release regarding her. Quit trying to re-write history – there was not a single breath of this story on any of the big three newssites until after the McCain campaign made it news Some of the commentary actually notes how surprising it was that this information was divulged in response to fringe internet rumors – clearly the McCain campaign was looking for the best excuse possible to air it early during a slow media weekend.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
It’s mothers who are asking what kind of mother she is being. Mothers in all political parties. To think it’s only democrats shows you understand the web and blogosphere as well as Grandaddy McCain.
We know she holds no serious degrees, but do we have to be reminded for the next three months? Jeez!
Posted by: kravitz | September 2, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
The RepubliCONs said what? I have not stopped laughing yet to post a response, great comedy material for the Improv…
Posted by: m | September 2, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
i dont find comments sexist, but they are very anti-rural.
Posted by: WNYtoby | September 2, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
WATCH OUT WATCH OUT! HERE COMES A PLANE SPINNING OUT OF CONTROL!
Posted by: MARK | September 2, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Jo
Rev Wright fought on the frontlines in Vietnam but McCain only flew over Vietnam and was captured.
Why dont you talk about McCain`s two spiritual guides(Parsely and Hagee) who would not serve America but preach hatred against fellow Americans.
Posted by: Kenny | September 2, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Here’s the sad part. Both sides can fling sexism at each other or whatever. The fact remains: We were betrayed by OUR “Liberal” party. We know it, I believe even BO supporters know it. We are not being “programmed” or baited as women, because it’s not working. We come from a generation that fought for the reproductive rights that are constantly held up in our face as to why we should support BO. No thanks. I know I’ll get the typical youthful dismissive response of “Good! Leave!” But I like going out SWINGING BACK as Obama deserves. I love that the Republics are playing OFFENSE on BO with his own DIRTY, BRASS KNUCKLE Politics. After all, he tried to copy them first.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
jhw539 your right these dems wouldnt answer it because they would have to admit they were wrong of course they think they are never wrong
Posted by: david reyes | September 2, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
ObamaMama,
If Obama or Biden’s teenage daughter was pregnant, would that disqualify them from running for the presidency/vice-presidency? Or is it only women who are disqualified because they need to be at home at such a delicate time?
Posted by: LadyGwen2 | September 2, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
I think the sexist comments are coming from Rush Limbaugh, didn’t he say “they had the babe”. No Obama supporter would have gotten away with that. Nothing but smoke, try to deflect from all the negative issues surrounding Palin – Our Yukon Barbie.
Posted by: FoCo | September 2, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
So should the Democrats accuse the Republicans of racism when they attacked Barack Obama on his supposed lack of experience? This stinks to high heaven and is a big disserve to women and men everywhere who despise the very fiber of bigotry. The McCain camp and the Republican party as a whole are scrambling to defend the indefensible…Rudy Guliani actually told Wolf Blitzer today that he doesn’t remember anybody raising Barack Obama’s experience. What? What does Rudy think the American people are…idiots? The bottom line…McCain chose somebody not thoroughly vetted and now the media is doing his job for him.
Posted by: Jason | September 2, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
davidreyes, i don’t think you can find fathers who are better than Joe Biden. He had already been elected when his wife and daughter were killed. He rode the train home every day to be with them, and his mother helped raise them.
Palin might be a great mother, and hopefully she is, and has a great husband who can fill in the gaps. But what mother would expose her pregnant 17-year-old to this kind of attention? What kind of mother thinks it’s a good time to run for VP when she just had a DS child a few months ago. Her ambition seems to exceed her mothering instinct.
Posted by: obamamama | September 2, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
We won’t be fooled… critize McCain and defends himself by saying his is a POW… critize Palin and its sexism. You repub make me sick, don’t be fooled democrats they are using it as a campaign strategy.
Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
“Jo, if you had a pregnant 17-year-old daughter, would you think it was a good time to subject your family to the national press?”
If what you’re saying is that mothers and fathers should give up their careers if one of their daughters gets pregnant, then I think you really need some real-world counseling. The Palins, including the daughter in question, are obviously quite happy and comfortable with their decision to view this in a positive life. Only bottom dwelling liberal hypocrites appear to be bothered by the situation.
Posted by: Inquisitor | September 2, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Oh I see McCain can attack Obama’s experience but the democratic party cannot comment on Palin’s lack of experience – He (McCain) keeps showing over and over and over again what a totally hypocrite he is. WE CANNOT DO 4 MORE YEARS OF THE SAME THING… NO MCCAIN! I want hope and life and something different for my country.
Posted by: AttitudeOfGratitude | September 2, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Jo Biden, although I like him better then Obama – and his remark of Palin being beautiful was definitely sexist. If not what is it ?
Barak Obama’s statement comparing his experience of running his campaign with running a state of Alaska – is nothing but a outright stupdity and shows not only his character but his poor intelligence too.
If you run a campaign then you run it for yourself. You run a state for the people who live in that state.
If you run a campaign, its a compition between the two candidate, there is no such competition when you run a state.
Calling Alaska being small and therefore insignificant exposes barak of his arongance and now I fear his style of functioning. He would may be completely neglect the issues of all those minorities whose number is insignificant nationally. For him only those matter who votes for him, and others go to hell – is what he is trying to say. God Save America – if its people put the govt in his hands…
Posted by: DeleteObama | September 2, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Hey, Carly, if that’s the case, then she also has more “executive experience” than John McCain.
Sorry, that’s not going to fly.
And the sexism thing? Please. As a woman, his selection of Palin over qualified Republican women is a slap in the face and such obvious pandering it’s not worth comment.
Posted by: Karen | September 2, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
What about the REPORTER GETTING ARRESTED IN DENVER?!
Posted by: Randy Lee | September 2, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
Actually jhw539, they released the Bristol story after the blogs were spreading rumors about her downs baby.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
b4uvote – Yes, we can all see the “unity” in the Republican Party. LOL The GOP are tearing each others’ heads off. Palin, Delay, McCain, Bush… they’re stabbing each other in the back almost daily. This is Unity? Perhaps you need a dictionary, my friend.
Posted by: Scott | September 2, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Inquisitor ,
just as obama repeatedly said, “they may not like me because of my face”
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
The measure of “is it sexist” is would you say the same thing about a man. Well when it comes to lack of experience and extreme views – you bet that they would be saying it – simply because it is true. She didn’t even have a passport until 2007 – and I would love to know what US states she has visited prior to this whole circus. Ever been to Florida? Arizona? The Grand Canyon? Ever seen the Statue of Liberty?
Posted by: nh bob | September 2, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
ALASKA FIRST, ALASKA ALWAYS!
Palin was a member of the fringe radical group “The Alaska Independence Party.” Her foreign policy experience is summed up with “Alaska is close to Russia.” I Accusations of sexism is the best response this desperately tired old candidate can come up with. Women are NOT fooled by Palin!
Posted by: Helen G | September 2, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
JOE BIDEN ALSO WENT ON TO POINT OUT OBAMA WAS BETTER LOOKING THAN HIM TOO.
WAS THAT SEXIST AS WELL??
Posted by: mm | September 2, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Palin also tried to fire the librarian when she was mayor, because Palin was trying to ban certain books and the librarian would not allow her. The town fought back and Palin backed down.
Posted by: krista | September 2, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
What a joke. This press release was probably written before he even announced her as his VP pick.
Posted by: TSnow27604 | September 2, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Why is everybody obsessed with this woman? Every major news outlet is attacking her for trivial things.
Obama can’t win now, so get over it.
Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Obama is a graduate from Harvard, Senator from Chicago and has proven to be a true leader inspiring thousands.
What other evidence do you need? He’s ready to lead this nation, just like JFK was ready.
Besides, on his first executive decision he chooses a VP that complements his experience and that would challenge him when needed. In other words, he did what he thought was best for the country, a sign of good judgment.
McCain on the other hand, choose someone that would get him the evangelical votes hoping that it would also get the 18 Million Hillary vote. That was a political decision from the eldest (cancer surviving) presidential candidate, thus a reckless decision and a sign of poor judgment.
Whatever happed to “Country First”?
Obama has proven he is ready to lead this nation to a better future and McCain fumbled on his first executive decision.
Speaking of funny arguments, how dare the GOP says that Sarah has International policy experience because Alaska is near Russia or that she can be Commander in Chief because she was head of the Alaskan national guard, which no governor really is.
Do they really think that the American public is that stupid?
Posted by: Jose from Florida | September 2, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
I find it rather amusing that we are debating which candidate is the most unqualified to be President of the United States — Obama or Palin. Maybe Governor Palin’s real role in this campaign is to demonstrate just how stupid it would be to elect Barack Obama President.
Posted by: professorj | September 2, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
McCain’s attacks accusing the Democrats of chauvinism are ludicrous. They are a figment of his senile imagination. Gov. Palin is grossly inexperienced and unprepared to be president. With so many questions surrounding her vetting, McCain goes on the attack, trying to stir up imaginary arguments in order to deflect this criticism. He is as incompetent as Bush.
Posted by: Two-cats | September 2, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Alaska a small state? It is TWICE the size of Texas!
Posted by: Lisa | September 2, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
McCain knew Palin’s daughter was pregant when he picked her and purposely used it to his advantage to connect with working class voters and Catholic voters. He visited the Carddinal in Philadelphia today to ask him for help getting voters to vote for McCain. Maybe he should start discussing the real issues like the Trillions of dollars in debt we are because of George Bush’s war which McCain wants to continue. What about a woman’s personal right to choose. If Palin’s daughter has a right to privacy about her pregnancy, then the Republicans shouldn’t use it. Every woman has a right to CHOOSE!!!!
Posted by: 1m4obama | September 2, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
re:David Reyes comment on the dems convention film on biden how he was a hero for accepting senator after he sadly lost his wife and child is he a good dad His kids had no mother but hes a hero then they wanna say palin is a bad mom?
—–the Dems answer is sexism attacks against Hillary and now against Palin. Obama had Hillary throwing kitchen sinks, and made obscene gestures as a joke when he said her name. We have seen the DNC candidate time and time again show his true colors, which are racist, sexist, bitter, clinging to old stereotypes, and downright nasty and mean. I saw him telling a reporter that he is more experienced than Palin, maybe he has more experience bloodying noses and name-calling, but he has less experience in effective government which benefits the people. It’s time to change to responsible effective leadership and that is McCain/Palin 2008.
Posted by: Babs | September 2, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
The more I read here the more I have to agree the obamaidots want the woman vote, but want them out of politics
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
The only people throwing the word racism around are the Obama supporters who are trying to guilt people into voting for him. Now the tables are turned and he is exposed once again (the first time with Hillary) that he is sexist. Racist..Sexist… What is the difference they are both terms used to describe discrimination.
Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
It’s a complete insult to women for her to claim any vetting/discussion/reporting on Palin’s background and lack of experience is sexist. True to Republican values: Setting women back decades and decades.
Posted by: Paige | September 2, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Let me get this straight . . . Obama defends Palin’s right to family privacy. The only thing he says about her is related to her experience compared to his, and now he’s sexist. The spin machine needs a tune up GOP.
Posted by: me | September 2, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
To introduce a woman few heard of, a new kid on the national political block, and put her on a national stage for the first time, what you expect the media to do? Their jobs of course and investigate.
Within days they found things about Palin and her family that McCain hoped wouldn’t be a big deal, but it turned into a life of its own. It has NOTHING to do with Obama, it’s what the people want—read meat.
Now McCain and the RNC, who never been know to support women’s’ rights, now cry sexism. Hypocrites!!!!
Posted by: debra | September 2, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
McCain voted against Hillary Clinton’s bill to provide $100 for Sex Education.
McCain is against the Fair Pay Act.
McCain wants to take way a woman’s right to choose.
McCain tried to derail the Family Medical Leave act.
McCain wants the “market” to sort it out. So it takes another hundred years – so what.
Posted by: nh bob | September 2, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Obama tells you the other side is going to point out one of his flaws. Then the other side points out one of his flaws, and Obama tells you that he was right about what they are going to do. Some people think that makes him smart. They fawn all over him for pointing out the obvious. Smart people are not fooled. They know that just makes him a politician who knows the average IQ and attention span of the public is shrinking. He’s nothing special just human. Passive agressive maybe? Agitator, yes.
Posted by: Kitty | September 2, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
1m4obama ,
so its ok to attack the daughter , but not Obama’s wife and her own shady dealings in the hospital and the compnay that did business with malmart?
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Message to McCain campaign also to Rove encluding Schmit don’t worry about the Obama/Biden people. They already pass the word its all about the issues.
Its Jon Stewart on the Dailey Show you have to worry about! His video take on this needs to be answered right away by
Rove encluding Schmidt.
Posted by: Will | September 2, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
To introduce a woman few heard of, a new kid on the national political block, and put her on a national stage for the first time, what you expect the media to do? Their jobs of course and investigate.
Within days they found things about Palin and her family that McCain hoped wouldn’t be a big deal, but it turned into a life of its own. It has NOTHING to do with Obama, it’s what the people want—read meat.
Now McCain and the RNC, who never been know to support women’s’ rights, now cry sexism. Hypocrites!!!!
Posted by: debra | September 2, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Please, the Novice calls someone else a novice. There’s nothing original about Obama at all. Recycled speeches, Republican game strategy and now pointing a finger at a Governor with 18 million to help point back at LOOK WHO’S TALKING.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Attacking the critics of Palin and her experiences as being sexist is a slam on all the hard working women who are highly qualified and cheapens their accomplishments.
Posted by: Roy | September 2, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Okay, now I get it. If you attack a persons business or social dealings you are being sexist. I am a Disabled Veteran suffering from PTSD, so the next time I go to an invterview I will tell the interviewer he/she has no right to ask me any questions about my business or social dealings because that would mean they are against veterans. If anyone doesn’t hire me, I will have to get on the local news and call them Anti-American because of my status. This level of stupidity is unbelievable. If you are looking for a job whether it be the VP of the United States or Garbage Man for your street, the people who are hiring you(in this case the voters of the United States) have the obligation to find out about your background and what you have done. She is supporting projects and ideas that not everyone is so happy to go along with.
Posted by: Doug | September 2, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
So let’s take McCain at his word – that he knew the daughter was pregnant. When was he planning to tell his social conservative buddies? After the election or before? What was his thinking on that? What did they deserve to know?
Posted by: nh bob | September 2, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
I am a woman who would love to see a woman president.
However, I would not like to risk our national security on someone like this. The Republicans have women with experience and sense who aren’t tainted by “abuse of power” issues in the first half of their first term as governor. She wants to be known as the one who “cleaned up dirty politics in Alaska?” She supposedly “stands up to Big Oil”–and goes to bed with it apparently since her husband works for BP! Perhaps she should run for President of the Country of Alaska since she has been a member of a party that wants to leave the union.
It is NOT sexist to question the background and experience of someone.
Posted by: Sense | September 2, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
debra,
if you get your news from the daily show then someone in your family needs to take your voting card away
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Mike, I thought that I was the only one who noticed. They seem intent on attacking every thing that she does. If she blows her nose with Charmin instead of Kleenex, they’ll say that she is anti-Kleenex and paste it at the top of ABCNews.com. This is rediculous!
Posted by: musicman6500 | September 2, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Picking what is arguably an extreme right wing and inexperienced person such as Palin largely because she was both a woman and extremely conservative shows that McCain has redefined straight talk to mean mouthing the words of Rove and Dobson.
Posted by: bhciapol | September 2, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Typical republican response. The MEDIA questions John McCains VP pick and the stupid republicans right away blame the Democrats for sexism. Disgusting, disgusting, disgusting. I can’t wait til McCain throws a tantrum, takes his ball and goes home.
Posted by: disgusted | September 2, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Obama had no history as a senator, so he had to say his experience running for president counts for something.
Thats just ridiculous
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
Is attacking Palin for inexperience sexist? Hell No. The same can be say about the right wing nuts attacking Obama inexpereince I would say that it racist!
Posted by: gl | September 2, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
“American women are more highly tuned than ever to recognize and decry sexism in all its forms.”
One of them being belittling their intelligence like the McCain camp just did.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 2, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
I was President of a student government for 2 years of a high school and 2 years of a university that had more students than Palin’s town did …does that mean I am more experienced than Obama.
ugh ask Palin who is the leader of India?
where al zawaheri came from ?
what are the major details of our trade agreements with NATO countries and with China?
what the legal precedent is for Presidential signing statements?
is it because she is not a man that she can’t answer?
since Biden Obama and mccain can…
sexism to try to ignore her overwhelming lack of undertsanding of the issues and any experience with those issues (and 20 months working with the oil companies while your husband is working FOR them does not, as they claim, make you an expert on energy) ugh
get this candidate out of here.
Posted by: dl | September 2, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
To be mayor of that little town – she only needed 900 votes. The town of Juneau is only 277,000 people. The city of Memphis has more people than all of Alaska. She didn’t have a passport until 2007. She belonged to an organization that wants Alaska to secede from the Union. She believes Creationism should be taught in science class. She is against abortion even in cases of rape and incest. She doesn’t understand the science behind global warming. But she does know how to skin a moose – which should come in very handy as president.
Posted by: nh bob | September 2, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
If anyone is sexist it’s the Republicans and McCain. They have so few women in their ranks that Palin is the most qualified for VP and they’re just using her to get more votes.
Posted by: NoMore | September 2, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
I don’t think the Obama campaign has made any sexist comments about Mrs. Palin. The media has gone over the top with trying to slam her and her family.
Posted by: dlc | September 2, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Pot – kettle – black. Almost, not all, but almost every sexist comment I’ve heard about Palin has been linked directly back to the McCain camp and the GOP trying to spread false rumors. Almost, not all, but almost every such comment about Hilary Clinton originated there too. I had some slight worries that McCain and the GOP could pull the wool over America’s eyes and squeeze out a victory. Not anymore, they still can’t grasp that America is seeing through their dirty tactics more and more each day and each stunt they pull hurts them. The only thing the Republican part can squeeze out these days is a log of ….
Posted by: Johnny | September 2, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
Whenever someone says a woman should not be held to the same standards as a man in politics (or business) they are the real sexist. In this case, the sexist ones are the Republican fools. The GOP is so terribly sexist it makes me sick. Obama and Biden are the only real heroes of women in this campaign now.
Posted by: Tracy Christian | September 2, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
“Obama was the one who stated over and over again ” they might not like me because I look different” as if who ever doesnt like him is a racist.
Posted by: nm156 | Sep 2, 2008 5:42:59 PM”
Well, if you read what you actually posted you’d notice that he said “maybe.” Not “everyone” dislikes him because they’re racist, but that there are some people who might have the inclination. I’m sure the group isn’t big but I don’t think you can deny that there are some.
Posted by: phi | September 2, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
The Republican claims of chauvinism is an outlandish attempt to deflect criticism of McCain’s judgment in picking Palin. I do not want Palin anywhere near the nuclear switch…she is an extremist and is not even particularly patriotic (remember, was a member of separatist group in Alaska which wants a vote on Alaskan secession.) Incredible!
Posted by: Two-cats | September 2, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
“If a woman is voting McCain because of Palin, then how is that any different from the many blacks I know that are voting for Obama because he is black?”
it isn’t. but blacks always vote dem..
obama ~89-92% black vote
kerry 88% black vote
Posted by: mm | September 2, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Palin never had a passport until two years ago. That says enough about her foreign policy experiences.
Posted by: ExRepublican | September 2, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
The selection of Sarah Palin as GOP VP gets more pathetic and disturbing all the time. Huge numbers of women are questioning Palin’s qualifications, not just men… and there’s nothing sexist about it. We SHOULD be questioning the VP selections experiences. Who each candidate chose as their running mate is a prime example of their leadership and decision-making skills. And whoa… McCain failed that test big time.
Posted by: DogBitez | September 2, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
did the obama campaign actually defend their experience based on the running of their campaign? that’s the moral equivalent of saying “i have credibility because of my argument that i have credibility”
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
It didn’t take them long to start playing the sexist card. They must have known there would be a lot of questions regarding Palins qualifications. Is she the most qualified Republican woman they could find??? There are far more women in the Democratic ranks than in the GOP. Who’s the more sexist party?
Posted by: GoHomeMac | September 2, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
McCain is the one who is sexist here. He picked a woman he hardly knows to be his VP pick for no other reason than the fact his campaign is in a nosedive. He´s desperate. I hope the men and women of America are smarter than to fall for this.
Posted by: George | September 2, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I find it very interesting on how people manipulate the facts to support their own ideology. If Sarah Palin were the democratic VP nominee all of the people hailing her as a moral and honorable women would be questioning her parenting ability, let alone her competence to be VP. In the end people are going to make it what ever fits their political agenda, as these people are never open minded and do not see the picture in it’s entirety. This is truly the United States biggest vulnerability.
Posted by: The real deal | September 2, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Carly is injecting the sexist card. No one has demeaned Palin for being a woman. But the reality is going through the vetting process from the public then it would get ugly and McCain will regret his foolishness. But it would be too late. Palin called Hillary a whiner, she should until Hillary takes her on. She hasn’t seen anything yet. Askew was hired to assist her and use the same tactics he used to smear McCain in South Carolina – McCain’s |Keating Five Scandal. It wont work.
Posted by: Panka | September 2, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
Palin is on the record saying Hillary Clinton was whining for complaining that she was treated differently than men. Palin went on to say that any woman who runs for public office should expect such scrutiny. Of course, that was before she was chosen as a VP nominee.
And, although I think her private life is off limits, I think its legitimate to question her experience, and that’s not sexist, unless the right wing will allow it to be called racist to question Obama’s experience.
And if we use the media’s “vetting” of Obama, then I think its perfectly appropriate to investigate:
–Palin’s political past (including allegations of abuse of power and her apparent flip flop on the bridge to nowhere and earmarks in general)
–Her political dealings (including with Ted Stevens)
–The church she attends and what her pastor preaches (he said I believe that those who questioned George Bush or voted for someone other than him would be damned, among other things)
–Any business dealings she has had, any real estate transactions she has engaged in, anyone with whom she served on charitable boards, anyone whose house she has dined in, etc, etc.
I will leave out questions about her father’s religious practices or his private life (even though they went after Obama on that) because I think family is off limits.
If anyone on the right objects to any such scrutiny, then I think they need to explain why she deserves any less scrutiny than Obama.
Posted by: txmom | September 2, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
The same people who attacked any and everything surrounding Obama are now saying oh this is sexist and trying to protect the same person who called Hillary Clinton a whiner. This is just to funny, karma is a ?
Posted by: Nicole | September 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
I had previously been undecided but after looking more into Palin. I’m really concerned about John McCains judgement in a time of war and terrorism. It’s one thing to say Obama is inexperienced and isn’t ready then put forth someone who is less experienced than him to be within one heartbeat of the presidency. It might be a little more acceptable if John McCain hasn’t already had bouts with cancer and wasn’t 72 years old. How is she ready and Obama isn’t. Alaska is a lot smaller population than Illinois.
Posted by: Antwain | September 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
The Republican mantra “Do as I say not as I do”.
Posted by: Boris | September 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
I’m an Independant who sent cash to the Obama campain. NOW I have a case of buyers remorse and will VOTE McCain/ Pailin!!! Man, they ROCK..
Posted by: Ynot | September 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
The liberals are so scared of Palin because she has made it on her own without the outstretched hand of government and minority interest groups shoving aid down her throat. Palin is an all-American woman who worked her way to the top like every American ought to. The Messiah and his followers believe that you can’t make it anywhere without government…and that if you do you are to be penalized(with extra taxes). Put on your foil hats liberals—OR our Right Wing Conspiracy will steal your thoughts and make you vote REPUBLICAN! (just some exaggerated humor to mock the lunatic fringe liberals)
Posted by: Kevin | September 2, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
I don’t question Palins experience because I’m a sexist. I question her experience because she doesn’t have any. At least Obama is in the Senate, which is a part of the federal government. He knows how things work in Washington, and a lot of other senators and congress know him and have endorsed him. Obama will get things done.
Posted by: Sexist | September 2, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Obama’s direct campaign doesn’t have to
play the gender card; his fawning media are doing it for him! With the likes of Campbell Brown on CNN questioning Governor Palin’s “motherhood;” with photos of Governor Palin’s LEGS wearing high heels on ABC and Drudge to name only a few sites, why would Obama and his crew have to do anything directly? He doesn’t have to call her “Annie Oakley” like he did Hillary. The sycophantic liberal media is doing all this for him. The same folks who claim to support the feminist movement are reviling it in this election cycle– first with Hillary, and now with Governor Palin. I’ve had enough and just made a donation to McCain/Palin.
Posted by: anne1244 | September 2, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
McCain has a lame excuse to “call off the dogs” on Palin. These are “attacks” on her character and life achievements so far. It has nothing to do with her being a female. If this was a man, we would make the same attacks.
Posted by: J Michael | September 2, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
txmom,
the only truth in your post was the Vetting of the media , because thats all there has been.
He was detroyed during his last debate and the left wing crazies attacked them for not giving obama his pillow
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
why has obama effectively ignored his own brother in kenya? is his political career more important than family?
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
I have no desire to bring Palin’s daughter into all this, but Sarah Palin opposed congressional funding for precisely the kind of sex education that it designed to prevent such unwanted pregnancies. What is embarrassing is not that Palin’s daughter is pregnant, but that her mother is in a leadership position and, even in her own family, was not an effective leader. Sure, underage pregnancies are a fact of life here, but not for people who’s parent would be a leader of our country.
I’m content to feel sorry for the Palin family and leave it at that, but there are some people who express outright admiration for Palin for her decision not to seek an abortion for her daughter. That admiration really taxes the intelligence of every American. Are we really that gullible to believe that this is what it’s about? That’s called “spin”.
I respect McCain, and have considered voting for him. How in the world can I put a turkey like Palin one heartbeat away from the presidency of the US?
Posted by: Davis Regzer | September 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Antwain–You were NEVER undecided if you read huffington post. It’s a liberal rag.
Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
bottom line
worst choice for a VP (man or woman) in our modern history.
period
and everyone knows it.
just when you are losing the battle against facts…you scramble to make the candidate the “the poor picked on candidate”
she’s bad…
there were so many women that were a 1000 times more qualified than this woman…but mccain didn’t “like them”
Posted by: dl | September 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
I am a former Hillary supporter and was decided to vote for Obama finally after Hillary’s speach! But since Mrs. Palin is on McCain’s ticket! I said to myself wait a minute! I am pro-choice but still like Palin. She is an average American who can understand the Middle working class better than a Harward lawyer, old Joe Biden and old John McCain!
I am for Palin!
Posted by: Sandy | September 2, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
Talk about spin. Is it sexist whe Carly says the same things about Obama?
These are true statements regarding her exeperience. It is not sexist to state the facts.
It sounds as if the McCain camp is playing the sexist card in trying to woo former Hillary supporters.
Having run teams and business with more employees than in Wassilla, I would have to give Obama credit for assembling a team, making decisions to put together a come from behind campaign and to function as effectively as they have done.
McCain’s camp seems to be floundering with the choice of Dan Quale in a dress. He should have stuck to his guns and selected Liberman.
Posted by: scott jeffries | September 2, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Cindy McCain said that Palin has foreign experience because Russia is right across the water from Alaska. That says it all for me.
Posted by: linda n carolina | September 2, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
for any ignorant lemming who still doesn’t get it, being the GOVERNOR of a State is still more relevant to the duties of the President, another executive position, than the duties of a senator, a legislative position…..
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
The tactics have been the same for the past eight years. If you do not support the war, then you must be un-American or unpatriotic or support terrorism. If you don’t vote for W and the Republican values, then you mustn’t be a good Christian. Now, if you question Palin’s experience, you must be a sexist. Please!!! Look, I am not blindly led blue but, the way the Republicans lable those that don’t agree with their every word, has me seeing red.
Posted by: ionlylookdumb | September 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
I guarantee if Obama were in the US senate during voted for the Iraq war, he will voted YES too, just like Biden, Kerry, Edward and Hillary. Obama would not want to be the club with Dennis Kushinic
Posted by: Plinplan | September 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
anne1244,
Your 10000% correct. They did the same thing with hillary.
Even after ferarro came to her aid, she was called a racist.
any and every attack on obama is seen as racist. any and all attack by obama on a female is OK.
Go figure
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
I have only one thing to say about all this folks – Do we want 4 more years of our government officials making decisions based on the teachings of the Bible? If the truth were told, that is the reason we are stuck in Iraq right now. Please either turn this country into a Theology (so I can leave) or end this fantasy once and for all and stop giving Churches tax exempt status. Then you will find out which churches are real and which ones hide behind the pulpit and suck money from old ladies via TV Evangelism. Palin already has said that her decisions are gods decisions.
Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
“I was President of a student government for 2 years of a high school and 2 years of a university that had more students than Palin’s town did”
Thanks for the giggles.
Posted by: Inquisitor | September 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
i just watched cnn they say palin was vetted and has proof she was also shes squeeky clean on the investigation i think things are gonna bite the dems on the butt and imma sit back and laff people glass houses throw no rocks looks like the dems have cracks in there ceiling after all
Posted by: david reyes | September 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Kevin it’s not the liberals that are afraid of Palin
it is anyone who realizes who she is…not the spin.
Russia, China, terrorists…trade, markets, social security…our dependence on oil, global warming…
show me her factual statements and explanations on any of these issues…
her comprehension of any of these issues…
you can’t there are none.
Posted by: dl | September 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
I am pro-choice,
I hate hunting,
But I have an agenda!
The way Hillary was treated by her own party, I will be treating Obama!
Experience and who is good for America did not matter but RACE did for the Democratic Party!
I will give it to DNC by voting Sarah Palin!
I just sent my first donation to Mccain/Palin camp today!
Posted by: Donna, Ma | September 2, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
since the lemmings are saying palin is a bad mother because her 17 year old is pregnant, it would logically follow that obama is a bad father because he allowed his daughters to listen to hateful rants in a church of god…..
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Those that belittle Governor Palin know very little of the complex government and federal/state relationships encountered in Alaska. Military, environment, energy, national parks, tribal engagement (100s of tribes) make for a complicated place to govern. She has made a huge change for the better up there and can do the same for our country.
Posted by: troy from Florida | September 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Plinplan,
correction!
Obama would have voted present, as he always does.
He’s too scared to make a mistake
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
This whole thing is crazy. McCain picked this woman so the Democrats could attack her to make us look bad. This is insane. I have no respect for the Republican Party. They throw their families under the bus to score political points. McCain figured that if he puts a woman on the ticket, it would help him win.
Posted by: Lois, California | September 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Republicons are the worst hyprocrites of all time. The My way or the highway party is loaded with corruption and perversion. Delay,Cunningham,Foley,Ney Libby,Bush,Cheney,Rumsfeld,Abramhoff are either in prison or belong there.Palins role model is Bush and Cheney no doubt. She’s a poor mother who allowed her underage daughter to get knocked up.She puts career over family,party over country. True Americans see sh’e totally unqualified! Dan Quayle was a much better candidate.
Posted by: AJ | September 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
By the way, as far as experience goes, I suspect everyone was as impressed as I was by Governor Bobby Jindal of Louisiana during Gustav. He is SO impressive and his press conferences masterful. Guess what? He’s only been in office 9 months–half as long as Governor Palin. Governors don’t have the luxury of sitting back on committees and voting “present.” They are making executive decisions every few minutes. Our greatest presidents have been governors, after all–Reagan and Clinton to name two.
Posted by: anne1244 | September 2, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Someone explain to me .. how a group that typically goes to a church where it’s mostly a Republican way of thinking (i.e. World Harvest Church – Google it) – vote for Dems all of the time? Why is that?? I’m curious ..
Posted by: Roger | September 2, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
I guarantee if Obama were in the US senate during voted for the Iraq war, he will voted YES too, just like Biden, Kerry, Edward and Hillary. Obama would not want to be the club with Dennis Kushinic
Posted by: Plinplan | September 2, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Maybe if she were the Governor of a much bigger state, or if she had been governor for much longer than 18 months. Maybe, then she’d be more qualified.
Posted by: YeahRight | September 2, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Ok…So Obama “governs” 2500 in his camp. and Wasilla Alaska has 5000 people. If we apply the Obama logic then she is twice as qualified as he is to run the country.
Posted by: georgeT | September 2, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Obama made a mistake when he skipped Palin’s experience as a governor. Better do some damage control than denying it. You can make the same argument that in terms of experience, Obama’s management of his campaign makes him more qualified than McCain’s five years as a POW.
Posted by: Julian
Why is that Obama job to list Palin experiences. You right wing nuts are really losing you minds. God help American from making the biggest mistake by elected McShame!
Posted by: gl | September 2, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
WOW what a great pick for VP !!!John McCAin will be the next president..Support for McCAin/ Palin is so huge I don’t think Obama even knows what is about to happen>>>
Posted by: Ynot | September 2, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Can somebody tell me what church Obama attend now?
Posted by: Bond | September 2, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
i cannot even imagine the mass depression and anger that will result when the obama campaign ultimately and inevitably fails this November….
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
being qualified was not an issue during the primaries though for the Democrats!I am for Palin just because of the RACE vs. SEXISM
Posted by: William, CA | September 2, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
If she can’t handle her own daughter sneaking around behind her back and getting pregnant. How is she going to handle terrorist behind our backs?
Posted by: reyes | September 2, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
irma:”Actually jhw539, they released the Bristol story after the blogs were spreading rumors about her downs baby.”
Ah yes, the ever authoritarian spokespeople for Obama, “the blogs.” I’ve heard the blogs also think Senator Obama’s a Muslim member of a radical Christian church who forged his oft-inspected birth certificate (and birth announcement published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961), is close pals with some terrorist fugitive guy who is hiding as a long-time professor of education in Chicago and was bought off by a corrupt financier who helped him add about 20′ to his backyard.
I did note that “this information was divulged in response to fringe internet rumors.” Doesn’t change the fact that the media proper didn’t breathe a whisper of this muck until they had a press release from Senator McCain. Senator Obama’s campaign typically ignores such rumors until they get mainstream play (typically as ‘lighthearted’ comments on conservative cable tv).
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
“He did it again on the 2000 campaign trail and had to quit in shame.”
Biden didn’t run in 2000. Even the simplest facts turn into lies in the hands of the right.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
How hypocritical of McCain to play the sexism card after he accused Obama of playing the race card? None of what was said about Palin was sexist, the McCain campaign saw something and decided to jump on it.
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Chris says: “the best interests of our children, our troops and America can only be best served by one person: Senator Hillary Clinton……supporting anyone else is tantamount to compromising the best interests of such loved ones…” Except for her pathological lying “I had to duck the sniper fire” your comments may ring true to some who don’t listen to the big picture. If it’s “sniper fire” today, it will be something much scarier in the future. Paylin is down to earth, she’s on the ball, she’s smart, and she should offer to debate Hillary–now THAT would be worth watching!!
Posted by: workingdoc | September 2, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Mudslinging, name calling, this is for children. This BS of name calling need to stop.Who is going to stand up to Russia? Iran? Afgan? We don’t know what these people are going to do for us, The United States for their mud slinging contest.
Posted by: daysofpast | September 2, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Rick Davis, campaign manager for John McCain’s presidential bid, insisted that the presidential race will be decided more over personalities than issues during an interview with Post editors this morning.
“This election is not about issues,” said Davis. “This election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates.”
The McCain campaign counts on your ignorance…
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
AJ,
I actually went to PA and helped out the hillary campaign and Im voting for Mccain.
Not because I have a brain and now Obama is a fake.
But Mccain is far more better for the country.
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
White women who vote for Obama just enjoy getting played! It’s happened once already .. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE not THE KOOL AID!
Posted by: Roger. | September 2, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
The MSM is so pathetic, if anyone didn’t fall all over Obama then you said it must be that they are racist. I am a excuse me was a democrat until the DNC and MSM treated Hillary with such disrespect and blantant sexism. It is ok for Obama to use the Race card against the former 2term president and all is forgotten but to say anything about the way a woman is treated is just called whining, The comments that have been made against women in this election cycle makes me sick. I am so tired of this, I am 43 yrs. old, very educated and not hurting by the economy, yet anyway, but I will not vote for the chosen one that’s for sure, so call me a racist or an angry uneducated female, I just can’t care anymore, I respect a woman who fights for what she believes in.
Posted by: chloe | September 2, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
reyes,
“If she can’t handle her own daughter sneaking around behind her back and getting pregnant. How is she going to handle terrorist behind our backs?”
Your funny and simplistic
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Lets talk about the issues and the differences between Obama and McCain. This is what this election is about.
We all saw McCain run right off the field somewhere and now hes going to flip flop back onto the field. A very excellent writer Steve Benen has documented so far 75 flip flops by McCain this election cycle.
Everyone likes Obama’s message of change we can all believe in. Hes not pissing off people so wouldn’t common sense say that he can work with more people then McCain?
McCain is all negative ads. His campaign strategists are attacking through surrogates now because its their convention time.
Posted by: RFK | September 2, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Sexism is NOT the issue here.
The New York Times has scoured state and local Alaskan officials and finds that no one was contacted in the Palin vetting process. No one !! Not even the FBI, even though the McCain campaign says they did request for an FBI background check.
This vetting debacle is reminiscent of the missing WMD debacle.
Hopefully the American voter has learned not to let themselves to be fooled again.
Posted by: newz4i | September 2, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
Lets talk about the issues and the differences between Obama and McCain. This is what this election is about.
We all saw McCain run right off the field somewhere and now hes going to flip flop back onto the field. A very excellent writer Steve Benen has documented so far 75 flip flops by McCain this election cycle.
Everyone likes Obama’s message of change we can all believe in. Hes not pissing off people so wouldn’t common sense say that he can work with more people then McCain?
McCain is all negative ads. His campaign strategists are attacking through surrogates now because its their convention time.
Posted by: RFK | September 2, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Worst Vp ever? Come on… I think many of you are speaking from a decision you have already made, and that is clearly for Obama.
For the rest of us, she has a legitimate experience as a Governor and city representative in Alaska. Attempts to discredit her are the very poorest form in America.
Barack Obama has very little experience doing anything, but that doesn’t mean he might not be a good President. I just think its the pot calling the kettle black… and its elitist, unfair, overblown…
Allow Palin to speak and show us who she is…. and what she believes will be best for the country… without avarice and hatred…
Posted by: elis | September 2, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
A Dem who has a young daughter pregnant isn’t news and happens OFTEN .. that’s why this one is!! HELLO!!
Posted by: Anthony | September 2, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Real Americans have problems, both personally and professionally…at least Gov. Palin is real.
Posted by: georgeT | September 2, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
daysofpast–AMEN!!!!
Posted by: workingdoc | September 2, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Good for John. Someone should have said the same for Hillary. About time we try to stop the sexual discrimination. it is blatant and totally unacceptable on MSM. Problem is many MSM news people are a major part of the problem. I will vote McCain for sure because of this sexist discrimination and attacks by the Democrats.
Posted by: DemocratNoMore2 | September 2, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Obama, the man with the SHORTEST RESUME EVER TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT since the founding of the Republic, thinks that the vice presidential candidate for the Republicans doesn’t have enough experience. AMERICA WAKE UP – before it’s too late! Obama is a farce.
Posted by: petee | September 2, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
The dems want a VP to have more experence than Obama funny . Is that because Biden has more experence than Obama?
Posted by: details | September 2, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Why is it sexist to criticize someone for their lack of experience and their previous (bad) decisions?
Is McCain not sexist for cheating on his wife? Is he not sexist for picking a better looking less experienced woman over many many older more qualified Rep women?
No one really believes that Dems are sexist as a party. Its just a reaction to all the scandalous news about Palin, trying to turn it around.
Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Plays Gender Card? HOW INSULTING! Obama and his supporters are smearing Palin and her family just like they did with Hillary! These last couple days have been a disgusting display of bashing from the Liberal Media. ABCNEWS, you should be ashamed of yourselves.
Posted by: amy | September 2, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
I stopped reading when it said “has served for two years as governor of a small state”. Alaska?
Small?
Posted by: Clampy | September 2, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Sexist–What planet do you live on? A Governor has more hands on experience than a Senator who has served a total of 144 days before deciding he was ready to be president.Governors actually have to run a state, do state budgets(which Palin balanced), oversees state depts and agencies, and appoints judges. They also have the ability to commute or pardon sentences and serve as commander in chief of the states National Guard. What has Obama ever run but his mouth?
Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Fiorina, Palin, McCain, and all of that group are trying any means necessary to take the focus off of the real issues. If Palin can’t take the heat, then go back to Alaska. This is a presidential race that should focus on the issues. If women don’t want to be criticized, then don’t get into the arena. I am tired of this sexist blame game. Stick with the issues that matter to the U. S. Citizens.
Posted by: Nancy | September 2, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
georgeT,
wasnt it Obama who said” small town people cling to religion and Guns. tries to turn it around and bowl and visit small towns and now criticizes Palin for being from a small town.
Obama can at least get mental health benefits for multi-personality disorder when he loses
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Gee, I really like Obama, but I would like him better if he had been president of the PTA. HUH??? When was the last time a man used that as his credentials for any job, let alone VP. PLEEEEEEEZE, stop this madness. Even a job at McDonalds requires more than a 15 minute interview…Says a lot for McCain’s decision making ability.
Posted by: VITAL2U | September 2, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
There is no way I want a gun-toting rightwinger who wanted an independent Alaska and doesnt care about climate change as the VP of the US.
That her daughter got pregnant at 17 shows the family is out of control. So much for family values.
Her experience in the executive?
Really she was saying: what does a VP do? last month.
She is easy to identify with but for a leader we need someoone who is able to LEAD. not someoone whose main talent is that we can chat with them in a bar.
Posted by: anya | September 2, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Sarah Palin is not a subsitute for Hillary Clinton by any standsrd. Hillary is an intelligent, well-spoken, well-traveled, sophisticated female, and she is backing Obama. The so-called “outraged” Hillary supporters are really McCainers. Sarah Palin is less educated than Hillary Clinton, dresses like its 1969, complete with the Beehive hairdo (who does that anymore?), sounds like a small town cheerleader, and switched to politics when she could not cut it as a sports journalist.
Obama does not have to play the gender or any other card. Just sit back and count the votes as McCain & Palin implode. OBAMA ’08!
Posted by: I-Vote | September 2, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Democrats, as much as it pains me to say, are starting the same low brow sexist attacks against Palin that they did successfully against Hillary. Racism has become very taboo in our wonderful country but sexism is openly displayed by politicians like Biden who comment how good looking she is (that condescending jerk) and by reporters that should be acting like journalists. If I had my doubts I don’t any longer. For the first time in my adult life I’m voting for a republican. Palin/McCain 08!
Posted by: HillaryGal4McCainPalin | September 2, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Poor Obama. He graduated without honors and his campaign people aren’t too bright either.
They can’t seem to conduct basic research. Palin wrote a letter to the editor at the time Buchanan visited her city and said she is a Steve Forbes supporter but knows the city will welcome Buchanan.
But hey, why let the facts get in the way of a good story. We all know that’s not how the Daily Kos operates.
Posted by: PeaPeachch | September 2, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
The blast that Sarah Palin is inexperienced simply doesn’t cut. After all, she is the VP nominee. In the event that she is thrust into the role of president, she can always appoint an experienced person as her Vice President, just like Obama has done with Biden.
Posted by: Graveney | September 2, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
VITAL2U,
making a decision of yes or no at mcdonalds is better than Obama’s experience for constantly voting present as a senator
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Why are Dems so depressed and angry? You haven’t been LEFT OUT .. you’ve just been LEFT BEHIND! Face the tru-fus!
Posted by: Chris | September 2, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Let’s not start on Biden, he is from a state with 50 people. And from his statements, I think he is jealous that Sarah Palin is prettier than him.
Posted by: georgeT | September 2, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
What was John McCain thinking? Did he know anything about Sarah Palin before he chose her to be his VP?
It sure doesn’t seem like it…
Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
We are living in the United States, a so-called “Democracy” with certain inalienable rights, including the “Right” to choose, in reference to abortion. It is every woman’s right to make that decision for herself, not anybody else and she alone has to live with her choice. There should be a clear distinction between Church and State. Unfortunately, Gov. Palin wants to impose her personal religious beliefs on the rest of her fellow Americans, regardless of their views. The candidates should stick to the issues that are important to the future of our country, not anything about the personal lives of the candidates.
Posted by: Ira | September 2, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Wow. Didn’t take long for them to play the sexism card for Sarah Secession. I even saw disgraced and fired CEO Carly “wire tap tap” Fiorino hawkin’ the sexism card today. Well, least they’re not claiming she is a POW.
Posted by: grob | September 2, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
I just changed my cable company and low and behold Im more qualified than Obama
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Pathetic
Posted by: JJ | September 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Senators in the federal government make decisions about national and international issues.
Governors deal with issues facing their state.
Obama went to college, worked in community development in Chicago, went to law school, then worked in his state legislature for 8 years, and is now in the Senate in Washington.
Palin went to college, became a sports caster, ran/owned a sporting goods store in Wasilla, was mayor of a town of 8,500 people, and now is governor of a state with the population of a small city.
They are both interesting candidates, but if I were to be the one making the hiring decision, I would choose Obama since the issues that he faces daily are more relevant to the entire nation.
Posted by: Experience | September 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
LETS SPEND SOME TIME VETTING OBAMA. HE HAS HAD A FREE RIDE SO FAR. MSM AFRAID TO BE CALLED RACIST IF THEY INVESTIGATE. OBAMA IS A BIG UNKNOWN. NOT AN OUNCE OF VETTING SO FAR.
Posted by: DemocratNoMore2 | September 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
the choice between the democratic and republican nominees this year is the worst that i can remember……i will definitely be writing in Senator Clinton’s name on November 4th because I actually want the best President for my child….
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I want to believe this is a private matter. However, if the GOP continues to make statements that blame the Obama campaign for the disgust and hypocrisy some voters have the right to verbalize, then the topic is fair game. They should have never formally made it public. THEY MADE THIS A PUBLIC FOCUS; no one else. They should take responsibility for their own actions and lead by example and let it rest.
Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 2, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
SAdams: What experience does McCain have then if Palin is sooooooooooo experienced that she would make a good president. You can’t have it both ways, either Obama and McCain are both qualified or they’re not.
Posted by: linda n carolina | September 2, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
It’s ridiculous for the McCain camp to play the sexism card. The truth is that a man with so little experience would never have been chosen. Palin was chosen because the McCain camp thought that Hillary supporters would ignore the issues, fall into line and flock to Palin as a Hillary-substitute…which is in itself a terribly sexist attitude. Women are not interchangeable objects.
Posted by: traveler22 | September 2, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
It’s laughable that the McCain camp is claiming sexism because people are questioning Palin’s experience. Does this mean McCain is racist because he continually questions Obama’s experience? The media and others are asking the question we should be asking of all candidates – ARE THEY QUALIFIED TO DO THE JOB? As Americans, we are the ones to determine who gets the job – they are the job applicants.
On a side note – I’ve already heard talk in the media about the difficult position Joe Biden will be in during the debates if he is “too hard” or “condescending” to Sarah Palin. Excuse me? There is no coddling in the white house! Can you imagine telling the foreign leaders they need to be extra nice to the VP because she’s a woman? THAT is sexism, in my opinion. No one should have to edit their position, words or tone of voice because of the gender of the person they are talking to or about.
In my opinion, Sarah Palin is not experienced enough in foreign policy or educated enough in business, economics and political science to qualify for VP. The “sexism” displayed has been by John McCain himself, when he replaced one female presidential candidate for another and think the rest of us (women) won’t notice these two women are nothing alike or would vote the same on any issue. But then again, John McCain has shown that all women are replaceable – just ask his first wife.
Barrack Obama and Joe Biden fulfill the requirements needed for the job, and they have my support and my vote!
Posted by: American Woman | September 2, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
DemocratNoMore2
You said it all !!!!
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Leave her alone. I think she knows international issues much better than Biden because Alaska borders Russia. The debates will show exactly that. She will totally trash Biden with her debating skills, knowledge and personality.
Posted by: Jennifer Standon | September 2, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Let’s just consider what the sexist, Obama-obsessed media has done during this election cycle. They’ve focused and made comments about Hillary’s cleavage; speculated about whether she had “work” done; regaled for days about her teary-eyed moment; shown “artistic” photos of Governor Palin’s LEGS while wearing high heels; questioned Palin’s “motherhood skills,” and on and on. Now let’s think if they turned the tables and mentioned Obama’s “cute butt,” Biden’s total weeping meltdown the other day (only received about 2 hours coverage vs. DAYS); talked about Biden’s hair plugs as if a newsworthy item; questioned Obama’s ability to be a good father and perform the duties of the presidency with young children, and on and on. Why is it that any possible racist comment is totally intolerable to the media but sexisim is cheerfully accepted in this day and age? I am utterly DISGUSTED and will vote for MCCAIN/PALIN 2008.
Posted by: anne1244 | September 2, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
This woman is now adding the boy friend rubbing noses in her mess,She is something else and I want no part of her.All her underhanded tatics form day one …Hopefully she will not be in the position to take over if the old man dies,thought he was bad before but now I know he does not have a brain in his head.
Leaving a sick wife for his little Barbie wannnna be tells you something about his choice of women…Trust him NOT
Posted by: indp voter | September 2, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
anne1244
Thank YOU!!!!
Well stated!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Maybe Barack should compare her management of how many State employees over her 2 year term, and not pick her “city” mayor experience. After all, she has not been doing nothing for 2 years, as he seems to imply.
Posted by: Ken Mascaro | September 2, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
How can McCain be serious? His whole campaign is based on vicious attacks and GIMMICKS. (like Mrs. Palin=substitute Hillary) I think the OBAMA campaign has very little left to do to show america he is our ANSWER-at least for now.
Posted by: DorianDupre | September 2, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Correction:
Roger wrote: Someone explain to me (any blacks here) .. how a group that typically goes to a church where it’s mostly a Republican way of thinking (i.e. World Harvest Church – Google it) – vote for Dems all of the time? Why is that?? I’m curious ..
ANSWER: Because as we see or maybe you don’t see (any whites here) that racial discrimination is far more constant and consistent in our lives.
Posted by: jane black | September 2, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Its not that the media is questioning her experience that’s sexists. What’s sexists is that the media is requiring that the woman running for the number 2 job be more qualified than the man running for the number 1 job. Obama has ZERO executive experience. Yet the media rarely questions Obama experience. Palin is the Governor of a state and in 2 years has accomplished more than most three term governors. What has Obama accomplished aside from running for president?
Posted by: wow | September 2, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
I sincerely hope that the country takes to heart the fresh and stinging consequence of electing an ignorant President.
It’s the scientific age and America can not stay in the last century in the face of global competition.
In so many years China will have a bigger economy than the US.
America lost the last eight years to ignorant leadership.
Sarah Palin is the poster child for ignorant right wing conservatism.
The world can not afford to have an utter ignoramus a heart beat away from the most powerful office, who does not believe that man plays a critical part in climate change.
This is really too late in the game to take on that kind of risk.
The kind of risk John McCain has nonchalantly taken on for himself, nay, the country.
This is a heart stopping bad idea that calls into question John McCain’s judgement.
On the other hand it is fortunate that we see this now and not after the fact.
John McCain and Sarah Palin are not fit to be the President and the Vice President of the United States.
Posted by: tarn t | September 2, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Well we know no one is watching the Republican convention because all you guys are blogging here!
Posted by: grob | September 2, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
This kind of politics by the Press and Democrats will bring them down in November. It scares me to know they talk about equality, discrimination and standing up for peoples rights and this dirty, low down, and gutter politics is exactly what I thought most Americans don’t want. I applaud her decsion to help her daughter raise this child and admire the actions they take. Most average americans can’t handle that and either disown their daughters or do exactly what they need to too and remember they are human and family. Families are the key to the success or failure of their kids and to me she is a great mom and will be a wonderful grandmother. What really stumps me is the same news media that support Barak Obama CNN, MSNBC are seemingly the only ones caring this 24/7. I honestly believe this isn’t the Democratic or Republican Party advertising this garbage it is the Press who have tried their best to control this election which is not unbiased coverage.
Posted by: Steve | September 2, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
“Palin is the Governor of a state and in 2 years has accomplished more than most three term governors.”
What has she accomplished?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Palin is the Governor of a state and in 2 years has accomplished more than most three term governors.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Davis demurred when asked when Palin will sit for interviews with major news organizations, pointing out that now would not be the right time given the “combative” attitude the media has seemingly adopted toward Palin. Pressed on the issue, Davis insisted that “we allot a lot more access in our campaign than any campaign in modern political history….we’ll get around to it.”
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
“Barrack Obama and Joe Biden fulfill the requirements needed for the job, and they have my support and my vote!”
I agree that Biden has the requirements, although Obama doesn’t. Ticket should have bee reversed. Oh well.
Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Oh yeah, we should definitely get into how many “employees” she manages in Alaska. Let’s start with the one she fired for not helping her sister get custody of her kids.
Posted by: grob | September 2, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
First of all Palin is NOT Hillary – we don’t even know much about her, what pisses me off is this uninformed, uneducated women wanting to vote for Palin – just because she’s a women!! Aren’t we suppose to vote for the “best person for the job be it male, female, black or white?” I mean get rid of Race and Gender, is Palin ready to lead America with no foreign affairs experience? She is 1 year older than me (I’m a female) and I’m not ready to run the world? So lets all relax and asses the best person for the job. Put your bias and anger aside and really think about it! Thats all I’m saying!
Posted by: M | September 2, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
“After all, she has not been doing nothing for 2 years”
So what has she been doing these last 20 months?
So far I’ve heard that being a political appointee on a board makes her an energy expert and that’s her proximity to Russia means she’s experienced in foreign policy.
Got anything else?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Sure seems to me that the only reason Palin was picked was a) Grampy wanted a woman because he thinks us dames will vote for anyone in a skirt regardless of her policies and b) to seal up the extreme evangelical votes.
Grampy thinks Palin was a safe bet because you’re “not allowed to hit a girl.” Well guess what. I’m a woman and I want to be judged on the content of my character, not the content of my pants.
Posted by: Liz | September 2, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
“Well we know no one is watching the Republican convention because all you guys are blogging here!”
I’m just waiting for the concert and the teleprompter reading from in front of a Greek temple. Oh wait, that was last week.
Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
I believe John McCain chose Gov. Palin because he truly believes that women who supported Hillary — an experienced, brilliant, life-long public servant — would vote for him because his Vice President has two x chromosomes.
Posted by: october155 | September 2, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Roger: “Why are Dems so depressed and angry? ”
? None of the Dems I’ve talked to are depressed or angry about the VP selection. Some independents I talked about who were ready to vote for McCain the Maverick were angry about his gimmick selection and pander to the far right that he used to stand up to.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Wow:
Repeating that Obama has no experience doesn’t make it any more true.
Read:
As an Illinois Senator he passed over 200 of the bills he wrote. These bills include:
1. A bill that expanded healthcare to over 100,000 people in Illinois.
2. A bill that set up community health centers to serve underserved populations.
3. A bill that provided the earned income tax credit to thousands of Illinois families.
4. A bill that reformed the death penalty that had sent innocent people to death row
5. A bill that banned gifts and meals from lobbyists.
Obama’s federal legislation includes:
1. A bill with Senator Richard Lugar which bans the development of nuclear weapons.
2. A bill that created a public database where average Americans can see how the government is spending their money.
3. A bill that provided important assistance to address the situation in the Congo.
4. A bill that Nancy Pelosi calls “one of the toughest ethics reform” bills in this history of the Congress.”
Palin? I’m sure her small Alaska town has some of the toughest dog sled parking by-laws around.
Give. Me. A. Break.
Posted by: PJ | September 2, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
JHW93 – I’m not talking about the VP .. I’m talking about LIFE pal!
Posted by: Roger. | September 2, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
for the best interests of our children, our troops and America: Write Hillary In on November 4th.
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Let me get this straight . . .
Drudge puts up 2 photos, 2 days in a row of Palin’s LEGS — nothing else, just her legs.
Limbaugh says, “We’ve got a babe on our ticket.”
The GOP talking points start with the fact that she is the mother of 5.
Who is being sexist here????
Posted by: Catherine | September 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
I just visit that site with the pictures of Palin daughter’s boyfriend and their is not way these trashy people are getting in the White House if I have something to do with it. You are known by the company you keep. Palin have felled to keep her house in order and now she wants a shot at running the White House. Please give me a break! The other shoe just fall off. After this week, the run is over. Obama/Biden 2008
Don’t you just love a happy ending. Dems back in the White House 2008!
I have nothing eles to say so I will be leaving to viist other sites and see what else is out there on the Palin FamilY! The Republs can not get back up after this story is over.
Posted by: gl | September 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
The Obama camp should hit back hard against these charges. Obama and Biden have ben nothing but respectful to Palin. The McCain camp is desperate because they made the wrong choice and are now regreting it.
McCain thinks it’s bad now, Wait till the October surprise.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 2, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Every governor from every state is a legitimate VP pick with executive experience. A state governor has to make more dicisions and take more actions in one month than any senator ever has to make in one year. To say that a state governor has no legitimate experience is a gross miscalculation and a dishonner to an important government position.
Posted by: cheryl | September 2, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
“Palin is the Governor of a state and in 2 years has accomplished more than most three term governors.”
Maybe. She managed to convince you that she was against the bridge to nowhere that she supported on the campaign trail and then dumped when it became clear people were pissed about it — thing is, Alaska still has the money. she also pulled in over 20 million in pork for her town of 6000.
Posted by: grob | September 2, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Trust me. As a former Hillary supporter and someone who believed strongly that I would be supporting the Democrat–ANY Democrat–this time, McCain was not so naive as to think that Hillary supporters would automatically vote for someone with two X chromosomes! If you think that, then you seriously underestimate Senator McCain. I have to say that my initial reaction was “Sarah who? And can you say “Pander?” Then I started reading about her and her MANY accomplishments while governor. I am strongly pro-choice, so definitely disagree with her there. Still, she has the courage of her convictions and has proven herself to be a strong, accomplished, fiscally conservative leader. Now that she and her family are being absolutely RAVAGED by the liberal pro-Obama media, who purport to support the feminist movement (ha, ha!),I am called to support her. This sexist media feeding frenzy has totally backfired!
Posted by: anne1244 | September 2, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Great Job McCain team getting the facts out there!! This “Anti-women” behavior by Obama and the libel media will cost Obama and the Democrats the White House. I am a former Democrat who supported Hillary who is totally disgusted by the Democratic Party and the Media. Sarah Palin is a breath of fresh air and will bring dignity to the White House! I and all my Democrat family/friends will be voting for McCain/Palin this time around!
Posted by: Debbie | September 2, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Grob—you’re mispeaking the truth. Palin’s firing action related to a policeman firing a taser into his 12 year old son, and not being appropriately disciplined. Palin should get a medal for the firing…. Also, the guy she fired was the guy she had hired a year or two before–she can hire him but she can’t fire him? She has the kind of take-action disposition that would serve well in a leadership position, maybe bringing a decent energy bill or other such pressing matters to a successful fruition? I think we need her as VP.
Posted by: workingdoc | September 2, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
given the choices of the two parties, i have to say that republicans aren’t the only ones with inferior brains…
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
I have no doubt that Sarah Palin has been good for the state of Alaska. One must keep in mind why she is for more drilling: the size of the state is massive, and the population rather small. There is no sales tax there and the revenue from the oil goes directly in the hands of the people. Dividends used to be about $300 per person (including babies) but has now amassed to a whopping $3k per person. If for some reason this system breaks down, many people (including my siblings) who have come to depend on those dividends every Fall are going to have a very tough time.
Just because Patin’s stated values are very familiar, this time I will not let “morality” be used to guilt me into my decision. Not voting Republican does not mean that you are Godless.
What makes me upset was that Palin allowed herself to be used to promote an ideology that is fundamentally wrong.
Posted by: gatorone | September 2, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Election of the Century! Yep! This election has been disappointing from the beginning! Democrat’s kicking out Michigan and Florida delegates! Hillary carried all the States necessary to win! Hillary would have carried Michigan and Florida too! Yet, Hillary was tossed aside! “Change came in more ways than one!” A Republican who would have voted for Hillary!
Obama is questionable! The fact is: Obama will not be a leader, but a follower of the United Nations! I can’t stand to see our nation fall into the hands of a man who brought on himself the questionable loyalty to our country! Obama made it an issue from the beginning! Now Obama gets angry when his loyalty is questioned! Why? Obama made a decision to be disrespectful to our flag! Obama who didn’t stand at attention while the national anthem was playing! So when people question this–HE GETS ANGRY! Don’t forget–IT WAS A DECISION made by HIM!
Posted by: Sharon | September 2, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Election of the Century! Yep! This election has been disappointing from the beginning! Democrat’s kicking out Michigan and Florida delegates! Hillary carried all the States necessary to win! Hillary would have carried Michigan and Florida too! Yet, Hillary was tossed aside! “Change came in more ways than one!” A Republican who would have voted for Hillary!
Obama is questionable! The fact is: Obama will not be a leader, but a follower of the United Nations! I can’t stand to see our nation fall into the hands of a man who brought on himself the questionable loyalty to our country! Obama made it an issue from the beginning! Now Obama gets angry when his loyalty is questioned! Why? Obama made a decision to be disrespectful to our flag! Obama who didn’t stand at attention while the national anthem was playing! So when people question this–HE GETS ANGRY! Don’t forget–IT WAS A DECISION made by HIM!
Posted by: Sharon | September 2, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
michelle obama essentially implied that Hillary was unfit to be President because her husband cheated on her….
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
From Chris: “the extremist nature and behavior of so many obama lemmings is very disturbing….” So Chris, give me one good example of this extremism coming directly out of a single important Democrat. If your paying attention, please note the source of the accusations. If you are a fare and balanced person, you will note that it is more an accusation then real fact.
Posted by: dlboggan | September 2, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
If it is confirmed that Sarah Palin was a member of the Alaska Independence Party from 1994-96, Senator McCain should withdraw her name as a vice-presidential candidate. To dishonor the memory of President Lincoln and his cause of Union by a governor sympathetic to a political party favoring secession would be proof that this person cannot serve all of the United States.
Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
There is ample racism and sexism in many of the comments posted here. Sexism and racism cuts both ways. The candidates are at the top of both parties. But it is the rank and file that elects them into office.
If we are not going to be able to ask valid questions and point out what is positive and negative about the whole lot of politicans who are seeking POTUS, then there is a MAJOR PROBLEM IN OUR FORM OF DEMOCRACY PERIOD!
I am not voting for a personality. I am voting for the team of individuals who can lead the nation! And if none of those individuals can take a punch or stand to have what is not attractive about their story exposed~then it is time to consider organizing a different method of selecting our leadership.
Posted by: mswhyte | September 2, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
What was it Hillary Clinton so infamously said to/about Barack Obama a few months ago? Wasn’t it something along the lines of “If you can’t stand the heat, maybe you should get out of the kitchen?” Okay, so Harry Truman said it first. Whatever. It seems to apply here. If Sarah Palin and the Republicans can’t stand the heat, maybe they ought to just get the heck out of the kitchen.
Posted by: Len | September 2, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
irma wrote:
“Now we are suppose to elect Obama because AXLEROD can run a campaign?”
Actually, yes. It is another example of Obama’s consistently good judgment vs “You’re doing a heck of a good job, Brownie” or spending 3 hours before deciding to select an unknown and poorly vetted choice to be a heartbeat away from stepping in for a 72 year old man who is a 4 time cancer survivor.
Posted by: hmpierson | September 2, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
there is only one choice for those who want the best interests of our children, our troops and America: write in Senator Clinton on November 4th.
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“michelle obama essentially implied that Hillary was unfit to be President because her husband cheated on her”
Yes she did.
I wonder if she feel the same about McCain’s infidelity.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
workingdoc “Palin’s firing action related to a policeman firing a taser into his 12 year old son, and not being appropriately disciplined. Palin should get a medal for the firing…. Also, the guy she fired was the guy she had hired a year or two before–she can hire him but she can’t fire him? ”
So you are saying that the Governor of Alaska is actually in charge of hiring and firing of individual officers? I keep hearing how Alaska has fewer people than the city of Fort Worth or something, but that idea really brings home just how small scale it really is as an administrative task. Oh, and be sure to send your results to the investigators in Alaska – it’ll save them months of time wasted collecting facts, interviewing people, reviewing records and other un-necessary research.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
The problem here is Obama didn’t respond the way they hoped he would..but I think the game plan was already in the can and they went ahead with it anyway. The media has definitely been trying to find out more about Sarah Palin and have asked some tough questions but woman or man this is the way it was going to happen. Obama and Biden have both behaved professionally.
Posted by: Sharonkathleen | September 2, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Vanessa
Don’t you realize that Obama is providing this negative stories to the media to tear down McCain/Palin. McCain has handled this in a mature professional manner by putting out the facts. Obama has only been whining again about he has more experience because he ran a better campaign staff over the past year! We need a leader not a “baby” in the White House. McCain/Palin the choice for Republicans and Democrats!!!!
Posted by: Debbie | September 2, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Yeash!!! She wants to sucede from the US. She has admitted to not following “The War”. She has an infant that she’s not even finished nursing yet. She tried to get her ex-brother-in-law fired. She has less than 2 year as governer of a state that has more deer than people. She hunts moose. Her daughter is prego and she’s willing to drag her through the media for her own political gain. She was a huge Stevens supported and Bridge to Nowhere supporter before she was against them. She wants to drill drill drill as if that will solve or even help our problem. Her voice sounds like a chalkboard. Her highest level of education is a degree in journalism from a no name school. She never even visited a foriegn country until she was in her fourties and has no foreign policy experience in the middle of one of the most complex international environments we’ve ever had. If I was hardcore a Repub, I’d stay home.
Posted by: Vote for Truth | September 2, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
OK, I now know more about Palin and her family than Obama. Heck, I now more about Tony Snow and Tim Russert than Obama. I know WAY more about Britney Spears than Obama. So far, the impression of Obama I’m left with is he’s lucky. I’m not sure that’s enough to move me or anyone else.
Posted by: shoemaker | September 2, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
So Dems are sexist for attacking Palin? Does that means Republicans are racist for attacking Barack Obama–the first African-American to be on the top or on a major party ticket period? Also, how can Sarah Palin criticize gay people when her daughther committed a sin to get pregnant before marriage? What hypocrisy? Plus, I can’t wait for Biden to say “Sarah, I know Hillary Clinton. I served with Hillary Clinton. And, Sarah, you are not Hillary Clinton.”
Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
If anything you guys should be asking McCain what was he thinking instead of trying to spin this against Obama. If he would have vetted her properly like a smart politician and used great judgement he would have picked another woman who is more quailfied. Just because she shares your beliefs doesnt make her qualified to be a heartbeat away from the president, who I must mention is up in age and have had health problems.
Posted by: Nicole | September 2, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Can someone tell me Palin’s accomplishments?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
I think what is creating such a divide is a fundamental difference between Republicans and Democrats. When Republican’s hear the word ‘experience’ we think of accomplishment, when Democrats hear the term ‘experience’ they think seniority. As a politician, Obama has more seniority, as an executive Palin has more accomplishments. For example, she turned a deficit into a surplus, she stood up to entrenched corruption in her own party, she enacted a sensible tax approach for big oil, she broke a 20 year political logjam enabling the construction of a major natural gas pipeline …
Posted by: wow | September 2, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Slam McCain for choosing an unqualified candidate as a stool pigeon to get Dems to have to point out that she’s unqualified. 20 months govenor of Alaska does not a president make.
Posted by: Scotti | September 2, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
So why doesn’t John McCain dump her so that she can gain the experience that she needs. Or dumping her would mean to be ‘sexist’?
Posted by: the Monk | September 2, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
SOOOO Unfair the left wing stations 2 – 4 – CNN – MSNBC – Who shovel the dirt for Obama. Everything Obama says is so special everything McCain says is questioned into the ground and labeled as out of touch – unworthy of thought etc.
It is a shame najor TV morning shows no longer report the news – now it’s their spin or twist of what occurred.
I no longer look to the news channels for real news with the exception of FOX and channel 7 evening news. We can no longer trust these news agencies for they all have an agenda that is far right leanings especially wolf, matt laur – Hard ball – and the knig of jerks Obermann
Posted by: a Citizen | September 2, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Uh oh – look out my fellow Republicans! NOTHING is going to go over worse OR I should say make em sweat like a “well off” family being able to take care of this child! They don’t relate to that at all!
Posted by: Roger. | September 2, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Sharon
Obama is rightfully offended when people question his loyalty because there are no real reasons to do so. I would be offended by character assasination too; wouldn’t you?
Posted by: jock59801 | September 2, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
I guess that makes McCain a sexist, too, since he attacked Obama for the exact same thing. That is one confused old dude. LOL
Posted by: wombat joe | September 2, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Barack Obama’s record:
1. He supported a radical preacher that believed the US govt. spread the Aids virus in the black community.
2. He is friends with and served as president of a board that a committed terrorist named Bill Ayers started.
3. He chose a 35 year Washington D.C. bureaucrat to be his running mate all the while convincing his supporters that he was an agent of change and hope.
4. He ignored 18 million voters when he denied Hillary Clinton a place on his ticket.
5. His surrogates attacked a pregnant teenager while ignoring that Barack Obama came into this world as an unplanned baby to an unwed mother.
6. His experience does not come close to matching up with Sarah Palin’s.
The Republican base is energized, and in the coming weeks the country will stand behind a woman that didn’t go to ivy league schools, isn’t a multi-millionaire, didn’t associate with terrorists, wasn’t a 20 year member of radical church and isn’t a Washington D.C. pen pusher.
Sarah Palin, is a mother. with a son in Iraq, a pregnant daughter, a special needs child and a college bound teen. She is America and her insight into the concerns of American families will propel the McCain/Palin ticket to the White House in November.
Posted by: Kyle | September 2, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
“If I was them I would cancel all appearences on that biased station”
Always good to run away and hide when under public scrutiny.
It shows strong leadership and the ability to weather political storms.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
The Obama campaign slandered & smeared Hillary Clinton with sexism and racism, and thugged 1/2 the Democratic Party.
What’s happening with Palin is really no surprise.
Posted by: 12SpeakOut | September 2, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
I am ashamed of this country, we have no
one to blame but the Americans. People in other words ourselves. We have let the government and all these crooks sell this country down the tubes. Wake up America, we need to pass a law that says if the President of the United States can serve only for 8 years, then the same should be true for Congress and the Senate and for Judges. Does your job guaratee you your job for life?
Do you get a pension? If you are in the military and commit a federal crime, do you still collect your pension? They do. Wake up how stupid can we all be? Worse yet I am tired of them using a woman to see if we are dumb enough to vote for her, if she is not qualified. Just because she is a woman does not make her fit to lead. If you people want 4 years of the same, then you must be prepared to suffer for it. I myself do not want to here the crying. The President does not have that much power, look to replace the congress and the Senate these are the people who will lead you to no where.
We will be saying may God Bless American and God please HELP US because we seem to not know any better. Please excuse my spelling, I am just so fed up with all of this. GREED IS UGLY and we have become very GREEDY people.
Posted by: Jan | September 2, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
I hear the Palin’s daughter has dropped out of high school because of her pregnancy. Not sure this jives with the notion of “conservative feminist” that the McCain has employed to describe Palin.
Posted by: Rick | September 2, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
“Don’t you realize that Obama is providing these negative stories to the media to tear down McCain/Palin. McCain has handled this in a mature professional manner by putting out the facts.” SNIP
Debbie, Here’s the thing. If the McCain campaign had vetted their candidate there would be no “negative stories”. And these aren’t coming from the Obama campaign – this is a page straight out of the republican playbook. Individual people looking for dirt. Did you know that the McCain people just got to Alaska to do vetting a couple of days ago. McCain is paying a price for selecting someone he spent all of 15 minutes with in 6 months!
Posted by: grob | September 2, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
Imagine the Christian Republican Church Party accussing anyone of being sexist.
Posted by: Erin | September 2, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
“Wake up America, we need to pass a law that says if the President of the United States can serve only for 8 years, then the same should be true for Congress and the Senate and for Judges. Does your job guaratee you your job for life?”
I’m all for that. How do we make it happen? I think that the career politicians that are so entrenched in the system will do everything in their power to stop that from happening.
Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
McCain must be desperate if he thinks that whining about sexism is going to deflect negative criticism of his boneheaded VP pick. I am seriously worried about the man’s judgement if he thinks this scandal-ridden, Jerry Springer freakshow of a family is somehow representative of regular American families.
Posted by: No Way No How | September 2, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
“Oh, and did I mention that she’s a woman?”
Posted by: Bill | September 2, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Palin: They say I’m young and we just met
One day is hardly time to vet
McCain: Well I don’t know if all that’s true
‘Cause you got me, and baby I got you
McCain: Babe
BOTH: I got you babe
I got you babe
Posted by: hamishdad | September 2, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“Obama speaks to our better angels and the great country we can be.”
In other words, he completes us. We can’t function without his divine inspiration.
Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Politics is politics. If they had nominated Liberman, they would be accusing the Democrats of being anti-Jewish. And if they had nominated my Cocker Spaniel, they would be talking about discrimination against liver-colored dogs. The accusations are always going to be the same, just tailored for who they are attacking or supporting. How about really talking about the issues: the Iraq war; recession; huge U.S. debt; the non-wealthy more middle class people losing homes, jobs, health care and pensions; jobs being shipped overseas; the worst inflation in 27 years, global warming and all the rest. Surely each candidate has ideas about these minor things. Maybe we should hear about where they stand on those things.
Posted by: JAB | September 2, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
So when is the new star of the republican party going to get to do interviews? And not just on Faux.
Posted by: grob | September 2, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
cump – You’re confusing landmass with population. Alaska has the 47th smallest population in the U.S. and only 3 electoral votes. In political terms, that’s a small State. Unless you think Caribou can vote. LOL
Posted by: Just The Facts | September 2, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Prediction:
In the coming weeks the country will stand behind a woman that didn’t go to ivy league schools, isn’t a multi-millionaire, didn’t associate with terrorists, wasn’t a 20 year member of radical church and isn’t a Washington D.C. pen pusher.
The country will rally behind a hockey mom, a mother of 5, a mother whose son is in Iraq, a mother whose husband works for a living. A mother who reminds all of us of our moms and maybe after a century of war, we will have an ordinary American in the White House who understand us.
Posted by: Kyle | September 2, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
whatever
Posted by: dan | September 2, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Mack – wow, you’re a little gushier than most people would be about Obama, but glad you’re on board. Obama definitely moves people, McCain’s lack of charisma leaves us cold and uninspired.
Posted by: Hiro Takahasi | September 2, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Tom Daschle (D-SD), who once had presidential aspirations of his own, was the US Senator from a State with roughly the same popluation as Palin. If anyone knows inexperience, it would be Tom Daschle.
Posted by: Greg Strangis | September 2, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
i can look my son in the eyes and sleep well at night knowing i support the only candidate capable of being the best President for him and my family, Senator Clinton…..any disgust or disrespect and hatred felt by those who support lesser candidates (mccain/obama) is evidence of the guilt they feel for compromising the best interests of their own families due to their irresponsibility in choosing to support a weaker person for the daunting tasks awaiting the next President
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Right, because that’s what we need in the White House, any ordinary American.
Yeah, let’s not put someone in charge that is intelligent, thoughtful, stress-tested. No, let’s put someone in that looks like they could be across the table from us at Shoney’s.
Cause the last 8-years of an average Joe, or average George have worked out so well.
Do your homework on this women, before she tries to recruit you for the John Birch society.
I personally would like a president smarter than I am, call me crazy, but I don’t want to be able to out think my Commander in Chief – just saying!
Posted by: Derek | September 2, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
If you look at some surrogates and way too many responses here, there is a lot of sexism and that was played against Hillary. There are plenty of anti-Palin/nasty sites cranking up on the web.
It was expected. I doubt it will work as well this time. You can’t find anyone who really dislikes Governor Palin outside of the good old boys she sent packing.
Experience? By any measure she has more experience than Barack Obama and she is the VP candidate. It’s as if the left was praying for McCain to shuffle off the mortal coil so they can look at us and say sternly, “See! Obama predicted this!”
McCain said he would scramble their jets. He kept that promise.
Posted by: len | September 2, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
“Tom Daschle (D-SD), who once had presidential aspirations of his own, was the US Senator from a State with roughly the same popluation as Palin. If anyone knows inexperience, it would be Tom Daschle.”
Actually he was a Congressman when he received a few votes in 1980.
But he was not actually running for VP nor had he been selected as VP.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
John you chose her because she is a woman and to use her for shock factor to “wake up the base”. No one in your camp denies that. Pretty much sexist on the McCain camp side I would think.
Posted by: dan | September 2, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
chris
Guess what. It’s a democracy. We all get to vote too.
Posted by: jock59801 | September 2, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Greg Stangis – here’s why your post is stupid. Daschle had years of experience at the national level in the Senate before he ran for President. Sarah Palin doesn’t. Keep tryin’ dude – I enjoy watching desperate wingnuts try to spin McCain’s awful choice into something salvageable. ROFL
Posted by: Just The Facts | September 2, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
For everyone slamming this report for liberal bias…it is the largest state in physical size but one of the smallest in terms of population. It is a fair point to say that her experience is limited, governing a city of less than 10,000 (Scranton is a metropolis in comparison) and a state with the population of a congressional district.
To say the comment about experience is sexist is to try and get people to stop pointing it out. McCain is not young and she would be next in line…and I’m not comfortable with that possibility.
Posted by: Jason | September 2, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
There is not a single criticism of Palin that would not be there if she were male. The claims of sexism by, of all people, our wonderful keep-women-down Republican Party, makes me want to vomit.
Posted by: Lee Morrison | September 2, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
FACT:
Joe Bidden and Hillary Clinton both believe that John McCain has more experience than Barack Obama.
FACT:
Barack Obama supported and praised a radical preacher that believes that 9/11 was payback.
FACT:
William Ayers is a terrorist and he is a proud backer of Barack Obama.
FACT:
The Democrats have led us into too many needless wars to be called the party of peace: World War I, The Cold War, The Korean War, The Vietnam War—enough is enough!
Posted by: Kyle | September 2, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
According to the Tax Foundation, which tracks such things, Alaska ranked among the top 6 in per capita federal receipts for each of the past seven years (1999-2005) for which the foundation reports data.
According to the Washington Post:
“Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin employed a lobbying firm to secure almost $27 million in federal earmarks for a town of 6,700 residents while she was its mayor, according to an analysis by an independent government watchdog group.
There was $500,000 for a youth shelter, $1.9 million for a transportation hub, $900,000 for sewer repairs, and $15 million for a rail project — all intended to benefit Palin’s town, Wasilla, located about 45 miles north of Anchorage.”
When you divide 6,700 into $27M, that works out to more than $4,000 per person. Sarah Palin = Welfare Queen.
Posted by: Palin Is A Fraud | September 2, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
She’s not too bright. She
was asked in a recent tv
interview what are duties
of the Vice President.
She drew a blank.
You can google and find
out in a few minutes what
the Veep does.
Mr. Mediocrity McCain picks
Ms. Mediocrity from Alaska
who is not a woman of substance.
Posted by: anon | September 2, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Alaska was once part of Russia and Sarah Palin is a member of a group that wants Alaska to break away from the United States. South Ossetia was a part of Russia and wants to break away from Georgia –Hmmm
Palin/Putin for country of Alaska 08′
Posted by: dan | September 2, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
“So lets see…the guy who “SMEARED” McCain in 2000-was just signed on to the McCain campaign.’
I guess he wanted preempt obama from hiring him.
Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Race and sex isn’t a barrier to run for the White House. Class shouldn’t be a barrier as well! Some people have thrown around words as “redneck” and “white trash” at Palin. If the voters are okay with “redneck” and “white trash” in the White House, then they can for McCain. If the voters are ashamed of “redneck” and “white trash” in the White House, then they can vote for Obama.
Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
The Democrats and the Liberal Mainstream Media have totally become unglued. What a delicious turn of events! The ugly words and actions by the media will shine for years on just how awful the media in America has become with their support of Democrats. This country was founded on Independent thinkers and they will trash the media and the Democrats by November of this year. I don’t think the media has any clue what they are unleashing in America. A Landslide for McCain/Palin in November.
Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Palin inexperienced? At what? She has experience in the private sector as well as the public sector. She has executive as well as legislative experience. Her expertise in energy is second to none on either ticket, her track record in government reform is competitive with McCain’s (Obama and Biden are on the Dark Side of that Force), and she has as much foreign policy experience as Obama. If you want to say that Biden has more foreign policy experience than Palin go ahead, but then explain why he has consistently been on the wrong side of every foreign policy issue.
Obama is hopelessly outclassed by Sarah Palin. It’s no wonder they’re trying to suffocate her with personal muckraking. They can’t compete!
Posted by: ragnar30066 | September 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
Poor, little,old, crazy McCain. Looks like Yosemite Sam has run out of bullets and now he’s just throwing the gun.
Posted by: Randi | September 2, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
I just turned on the Republ Convention and it is so weak they didn’t even have Signs made with McCain/Palin. The all over signs they have made with a joke the Republs are!
Posted by: gl | September 2, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
After the way McCain refers to women, HIM calling anyone sexist is hypocrisy of the highest order, but then hypocrisy is getting to be the hallmark of this Republican campaign
Posted by: Luke T | September 2, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
I was so disappointed with the GMA segiment about Palin’s daughter this morning. That was a disgrace. I was really disappointed in Diane Sawyer and Robin Robbins judgemental comments. I have lost respect for them.
Posted by: Christie | September 2, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Tom Delay is out of the closet. This is what rips me. I’m tired of criminals in suits thinking they have my ear when it comes to morality.
Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 2, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Obama’s budget decisions: for the betterment of himself.
Palin’s budget decisions: for the betterment of her city or state.
Hands down she is more qualified than him. When it comes to executive experience, he can be her valet.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 2, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Kyle – you’re confusing your opinions with facts again. It’s your OPINION that Rev. Wright is a “radical”. And it’s your OPINION that Ayers is a “terrorist” – after all, if he is currently a known-terrorist as you claim, why isn’t he in jail? You’re full of crap and you won’t convince anybody except your fellow wingnuts with this irrelevant nonsense.
Posted by: Just The Facts | September 2, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
It is hardly sexist to point out that Governor Palin has:
1. had a passport for little more than a year.
2. governed a state (for a year and a half) that is smaller than many American cities.
3. served as mayor of a town not much bigger than a lot of high schools.
There is a certain audacity in the assumption that this background (never mind all the other items in the news) prepares one to be commander-in-chief. To recognize that, one need not be sexist, or even partisan.
Posted by: kd | September 2, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
There is no such thing as liberal bias in the mainstream press…It’s a fabrication of the right-wing media. Liberal bias exists in the liberal wings of media (Daily Kos, Huffington Post). If the press is anything, it’s conservative – after all, it’s owned by corporations that have an overall conservative slant.
“The best form of propaganda is one where the sheep do not realize the shepherd is leading them astray”.
That’s what 21st century American politics have perfected. Which the Germans, Japanese and Soviets never could get right. Blind fealty does not work – one must leave the illusion of free will.
Posted by: Derek | September 2, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
The Republs have nothing but old white men at this Convention. There is more then old white men in this world and the Republs just don’t get it that USA is a minitoiry country and the Republs are so out of sink!
Posted by: gl | September 2, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
“If what you’re saying is that mothers and fathers should give up their careers if one of their daughters gets pregnant, then I think you really need some real-world counseling. The Palins, including the daughter in question, are obviously quite happy and comfortable with their decision to view this in a positive life. Only bottom dwelling liberal hypocrites appear to be bothered by the situation.”
First of all YES you should give up your career IF by chance that career includes preaching family values. For those of you that don’t know; family values are about much more than shooting out kids. It’s about teaching them the difference between right and wrong. It’s about teaching them the importance of who you choose to have children with (genetically, socially, and financially). How in his good name can the people like you not see that this is a problem that transcends political ideology? What are the chances of having a baby at 17/18 that this young lady at some point will feel grown before her time, that she missed out on her youth? Maybe she won’t, but that will be more than likely because she has a family that has power and money. Your hopes for success wouldn’t be quite so high if the young lady was from a poor family with little to no social influence. More family members do not equate into more family values.
Second, you are the one that needs “real-world counseling” if you think for one minute that you would feel the same way and spew that same ridiculous rhetoric if it was Obama’s daughter that got pregnant. That would make you a what? Maybe it would make you as you said, a “bottom dwelling hypocrite.”
Posted by: tx_doughboy | September 2, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Obama wants to gut the military, stop all protection of America so he can open the shores for his friends from the Mideast to walk into this country and take it over. The Democrats will then apologize for being stupid.
Posted by: McCain Will Stop Evil | September 2, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
“She has experience in the private sector as well as the public sector.”
Fishing with her husband or her career as a sports caster?
I will take community organizer and Constitutional Law professor over that.
“She has executive as well as legislative experience.”
Now her 4 years on the small town council are added to her vaunted mayoral experience.
“Her expertise in energy is second to none on either ticket,”
How so? She was a political appointee on a board for 2 years?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Obama HAS been vetted for 2 years – thank you. He’s passed the threshold (look at the polls). Now it’s Palin’s turn for 2 months. Let’s see if she holds up under the same media deluge like Obama did. Welcome to national poliitcs Ms. Palin.
Posted by: Kevin | September 2, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
McCain Will Stop Evil – No, he doesn’t. Please stop lying. It just makes you look hysterical and ridiculous.
Posted by: Kit | September 2, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Evil is a figment of the imagination for weak minded individuals that need to have complex problems solved for them with easy answers that require neither time nor sacrifice.
Evil exists only in the mind of the caster, not the cast.
Posted by: Derek | September 2, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Nicole–You are worried about special interests and lobbyist running the country? Biden’s son is a lobbyists!
Posted by: S Adams | September 2, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Well it was deemed rasict to question Obama’s experience, so I guess what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
Although the MSM never question Obama’s claims. But then again, they simply print his talking points verbatum.
Posted by: Andrea | September 2, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
It’s not sexist to ask what her qualifications are.
It would be sexist to give her a pass for being a woman.
Posted by: Dr. T | September 2, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Palin is nothing more than a glorified PTA president…No thanks!
Posted by: Anna | September 2, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
And I suppose it is the Dems fault that her daughter is knocked up, the Dems fault that she abused her authority in sacking her employee, the Dems fault that she was a member of the Alaskan independence movment, its the Dem’s fault that she lied about the bridge to nowhere.
Who is the Whinner now????
If you can’t take the heat get the h@ll out of the kitchen.
Posted by: Oh Please | September 2, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
“Palin’s budget decisions: for the betterment of her city or state”
She ran the town into tens of millions of dollars of debt.
Thankfully Alaska had oil royalties to keep them afloat.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
One last point…
Republican spokespeople are giving Palin high marks for “balancing the Alaskan budget”…
Did you know that because of oil revenues, the surplus she has been given is almost 5 billion dollars?
All governors should be so lucky… Windfall tax revenues do not make this governor ready for an office as high as VP of the greatest nation in the world.
Posted by: Jason | September 2, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
“If the press is anything, it’s conservative – after all, it’s owned by corporations that have an overall conservative slant.”
Haha. They are for whatever is making them money at the moment. Right now Obama is a hot seller. It’s funny that the same media that is pushing Obama down our throats is the same media that pushed the Iraq war down our throats.
Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I don’t think John McCain really wants Sarah Palin to be his VP. He wants Joe Lieberman, but the Dobsonites in his Party would commit mass suicide if he chose Lieberman, so he choose Palin to be his sacrificial lamb (or moose). After the convention, he will accept Palin’s resignation and name Lieberman as his VP.
Posted by: hamishdad | September 2, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Sexist – this lady herself in an interview was quoted as saying that HRC was a whiner because the press looked at her every move. Her reply was to toughen up – but now that she is in the race she must think that the rules have changed….figures – republican = whiner
Posted by: jozy | September 2, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Paul T. – Yes, she does. She also belonged to a group that wanted Alaska to secede from the United States. Why would McCain nominate a traitor?
Posted by: KING OF MEN | September 2, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Watch closely over the next week as the media overplays the Palin story and the tables start to turn. I am already hearing it where I work. And the “break room” test is usually pretty accurate. Americans don’t mind the media tearing into politicians. But when they sense a lack of fair play, opinions begin to change. The attack against Palin has become total destruction of her daughter, a minor. And I don’t know anyone who finds that acceptable. Too many parents out there have been in the same situation before and they fought hard to protect their child from others scorn. Mark my words. The media has gone too far and the result will be the opposite of what they intend.
Posted by: carolddche | September 2, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
“I guess he wanted preempt obama from hiring him.”
Or McCain realized he is going to lose this election so he needed to change the plan starting with his rushed choice of a VP. He’s gonna go the slime route.
He’s such a hypocrite.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Paul T – if all these things you allege about Palin are true, then I will definitely not vote for the GOP ticket!
Posted by: American Pride | September 2, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Obama-Yah-Wright – Her budget decisions are well known in Alaska. She cut taxes for corporations and business and raised personal property tax to make up for the loss of revenue. Yup, that sums it up; She’s a Republican.
Posted by: dan | September 2, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
MACK – President Bush pushed the war down our throats. He used the PRESS to make his false case for war to AMERICA. AND when the truth was unveiled he disowned them. The PRESS is carrying JOHN MCCain.
Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 2, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
It seems that a lot of people
are fond of throwing around
their candidate’s resume.
Palin was asked recently in
an interview to describe the
duties of the Vice President.
She could not answer.
Her resume that’s being
overinflated by Republicans
doesn’t really add up to
anything if she cannot answer
a simple question about the
job for which she has just been selected.
She is an Alaskan phony.
Posted by: anon | September 2, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“It’s funny that the same media that is pushing Obama down our throats is the same media that pushed the Iraq war down our throats”
Would that be the Iraq War that was based on lies that Obama was against and John McCain was for?
The war that has cost us over 4000 American servicemen and women’s lives and left tens of thousands severely injured?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
I can’t stop laughing at McCain’s pick – didn’t he bother to vet this woman? Every new thing I hear about her is worse and worse. She is a total disaster. McCain should have held his nose and picked Romney. His stunt has backfired bigtime.
Posted by: randall jarrett | September 2, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
With Obama up by 5 to 8, it’s really 8 to 11 counting in the cell phone dilemma in modern statistical polling.
Households without landlines now make up over 15% of total US households, these numbers skew disproportionately to Minorities and young urbanites – demographic blocks that favor Obama to McCain by 2:1, 3:1 ratios.
McCain down by 5 is a landslide for Obama.
Posted by: Derek | September 2, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Why would McCAIN risk a VP that is a decent person? They would out him and tell the world what a loser he and his party is and would drop off the ticket. He had to find somebody like this lady who will go along with the republican trashing of our CONSTITUTION and actually help ALASKA secede so ROBBER BARON republicans can hide somewhere and deny lawful jurisdiction to anybody and have the oil to prime the pump of their anointed KINGDOM….ERGO
Posted by: daddyblue | September 2, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
“MACK – President Bush pushed the war down our throats. He used the PRESS to make his false case for war to AMERICA. AND when the truth was unveiled he disowned them. The PRESS is carrying JOHN MCCain.”
Oh the poor media was duped. What is this Cuba? I guess it’s too much to ask them to do their jobs and investigate the story. Scandals are more exciting and take less brain cells.
Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
DOES GOV. PALIN FAIL TO VOTE ON ISSUES, FLIP-FLOP FREQUENTLY, AND LIE ABOUT HER OPPONENT FREQUENTLY.
Well, she IS McCain’s “soulmate”.
Posted by: Walter Lee | September 2, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Yup – there the Dems go again – being sexist! They think that because they put Hillary away using that card that they can do it again with Palin. Well, I don’t think women will let them get away with it twice!
Posted by: Beckie | September 2, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“Other news netwwork report that Gov. Palin was not a member of AIP,”
She made a video supporting AIP JUST LAST YEAR. Give it up.
Posted by: Walter Lee | September 2, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
I seriously think that McCain has lost it. His judgement on this Palin clown was a disaster. If he can’t get something as simple and basic as his VP pick right, can you imagine the awful decisions he will make as President? Can you imagine the clowns he will surround himself with in his cabinet? Phil Gramm? McCain has lost it. I don’t like Obama much, but McCain is just not the man he used to be.
Posted by: Davis | September 2, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
For months, the McCainiacs have said they will run on his judgment and experience. In his first presidential decision, John McCain has shown that he is willing to endanger his country, potentially leaving it in the hands of someone who simply has no business being a heartbeat away from the most powerful, complicated, difficult job in human history.
For a man who is 72 years old and has had four bouts with cancer to have chosen someone so completely unqualified to become president is shockingly irresponsible. Suddenly, McCain’s age and health become central issues in the campaign, as does his judgment.
McCOMA NEEDS A CHECKUP FROM THE NECK UP!!
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Entertaining. McCain seat of the pants decides to select an inexperienced newbie from way on the low population center count in the US states – then when people comment on it, you whine that it’s sexism.
The internet flames about pregnancy were due to her odd behavior with her last pregnancy – the common knowledge is that she reported her water broke while at a speech in Texas. She flew home to Alaska and then drove to Wasilla. Many people found that beyond bizaree to do when you know you are pregnant with a high risk baby. She brought that attention on herself.
Posted by: Citizen Voter | September 2, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
MACK – just great! Since he didn’t get caught it wasn’t really a lie. Sit down!
Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 2, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
I like the part where Obama boast of how much money he is spending on his bid for office. (Look at all the healthcare that would have bought for the poor).
Posted by: david | September 2, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
I might have missed it but I don’t recall seeing an engagement ring on that young woman’s finger.
Posted by: Ring Optional? | September 2, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
I predict in 10 days, fourteen at the outside, Palin will back out of the campaign, citing family reasons. McSame has pulled the ultimate blunder with this unvetted choice for running mate.
Posted by: Vicki | September 2, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Sexism?!!!! Give me a break. The only reason McCain picked her is because she is a woman. I think that is sexist, trying to pick a woman to get the women’s vote.
Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
“This smear has made this Independent voter sway away from the Obama side.”
But BS I thought we had lost your vote days ago?
How many time are we going to lose your vote before you realize….
we just don’t care.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Beckie – In case you missed it, Palin called Hillary a whiner. I thought the whole reason that McCain picked her was to win over us Hillary supporters, not insult our candidate. Who does this nobody from nowhere think she is to insult a woman like Hillary? The hell with McCain… I considered him for a minute when Obama didn’t pick Hillary as his VP, but Sarah Palin’s attack on Hillary brought me back to my senses. I’m going to hold my nose and vote for Obama – because McCain is so much worse.
Posted by: PUMA NO MORE | September 2, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Ring Optional? – I didn’t see one either but I hear mom’s pretty good with a shotgun.
Posted by: Jim Davis | September 2, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
I can’t Belive Robin Roberts & Diane Sawyer, who seemed to be judging The Palin’s. Easy to Judge when you have no Children of your own. And who is ABC after sitting on the Edwards Story for almost 2 years. Edwards is an adult who cheated on his sick wife & may have a child with this Women. I guess the only children that are not Off limit are the Children of Republican’s. Shame on all of you. How about a real story explaining the Accomplishments of Barack Obama during his time in the Senate or explain why he failed to vote at least 130 times so no one could use his vote against him.
Posted by: Rosemarie Celentano | September 2, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
“I predict in 10 days, fourteen at the outside, Palin will back out of the campaign, citing family reasons. McSame has pulled the ultimate blunder with this unvetted choice for running mate. ”
It will have to be sooner than that.
Deadlines for putting names on ballots in coming up quick.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
>Roger: “Why are Dems so depressed and angry? “<
Hmmm, maybe we find it depressing that Repubs actually believe that living in a state near Russia indicates that you have foreign policy experience (by osmosis, perhaps)? So…you're telling me that she's spent time negotiating with Putin? (I thought not).
Posted by: traveler22 | September 2, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Since when is pointing out inexperience sexist? I seem to be missing something..unless everyone is avoiding the obvious question – would McCain have chosen a MAN with Palin’s “experience”? Hmm, and he had a few on the short list.
And on the topic of Palin’s daughter… why is it okay for the Republicans to use Sarah Palin’s baby as a symbol of their anti-choice politics, but it’s not okay to bring up her daughter when discussing the failure of “abstinence only sex education” – which Palin supports?
Posted by: Mick | September 2, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
And the cost of the Iraq war? I guess that would have been enough money to uh…uh.. perhaps run a small country? Campaign donations are voluntary (not McCains) not stolen from American taxpayers.
Posted by: WhereDoesItEnd | September 2, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
BS – blah, blah, blah… nobody is buying your “independent voter” nonsense, dude. Meanwhile, here in the real world, it’s clearly the GOP that didn’t do it’s homework by not vetting this woman. You can spin it any way you like, but it’s obvious that Palin is not ready for prime time.
Posted by: kloogie | September 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Paul T – until he wins the election. Thanks for asking.
Posted by: roscoe | September 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
BS – no one believes you’re an independent. LOL – A true independent would be seriously looking at McCain’s poor judgment right about now.
Posted by: dan | September 2, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Awww poor FoxNews viewers.
They miss the comforting hatred emitting the like of Hannity.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Here’s the thing that I think I’m most offended about (as a woman) that if Palin was a man with those same credentials she would have NEVER been considered. It is 100% fair to look at her record and her experience. And to question it. It’s being informed. And while I do think her daughter & children should be off limits, it makes me sad that a parent would subject her daughter to that kind of scrutiny on such a national scale. When that child has lived in a small town for most of her life. I just think that’s sad.
Posted by: syd rocks | September 2, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
John McCain”s record on family planning.
He voted against requiring health care plans to cover birth control (3/22/03).
He voted against comprehensive, medically accurate *** education (7/25/06).
He voted against international family planning funding (3/14/96).
He voted against funding to prevent teen and unintended pregnancies (3/17/05).
He voted against public education for emergency contraception (3/17/05).
And he voted against restoring Medicaid funding that could be used for family planning for low-income women (3/17/05).
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
The talk of women being insulted by McCain’s pick is ludicrous.
All the women I know are thankful to McCain. Obama is the one who insulted them.
They know Obama had the option of choosing Hillary for VP which would have been the wise thing to do since she is more qualified than all the others, including him, combined, and is the winner of the People’s Votes.
McCain did not have the option of choosing Hillary.
But, he still did the right thing by putting his trust and confidence in a woman, a very accomplished woman.
We all know Gov. Palin doesn’t compare to Hillary, but Obama and Biden don’t either.
So, BO, you blew it. McCain-Palin will win this one. Then it’s HILLARY-ANYBODY 2012.
Posted by: Sam J. | September 2, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
bwahahahahahahahahahaha! This is hillarious! Nice pick, McCain – you stupid old geezer! Palin is a total disaster! Have a great convention, you dopes! Can’t wait to see you lose in November! hahahahahahahahaha!
Posted by: The Magnificent Ambrose | September 2, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
“Why is that Obama job to list Palin experiences. You right wing nuts are really losing you minds. God help American from making the biggest mistake by elected McShame!”
gl, don’t you expect a bit more fairness from Obama? Besides, I’m not a right wing nuts. That’s just the fact.
Posted by: Julian | September 2, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Palin is shallow.
Unable to describe the duties
of the Vice President in a
recent interview.
Her experience whatever it
may be fails to qualify her
for Veep.
Posted by: anon | September 2, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks.
It’s on PERMANENT ACTIVE DUTY, unlike other Guard units. As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her exposure to classified material may rival even Biden’s.
She’s also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force, ASDF, a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security’s counterterrorism plans. Palin is privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country’s defense. Given Alaska’s proximity to Russia, she may have security clearances we don’t even know about.
According to the Washington Post, she first met with McCain in February, but nobody ever found out. This is a woman used to keeping secrets. She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is.
Posted by: James K | September 2, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Palin is a right to lifer. Normally I think that a person who believes in the sanctity of life would express that belief in their lives. Palin boasts of killing bears and moose. She has a bear rug in her office which she is glad to tell anyone who would listen, that she killed the bear herself. Now she is engaged in a effort to have Polar bears and Moose removed from the “Endangered Species” list. She is an avid backer of the Iraq war; calls it Gods’s war, a war that has resulted in the deaths of over 41000 Americans and 800,000 Iraqis. She is an avid fan of capital punishment.
SO MUCH FOR THE SANCTITY OF LIFE!
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
DEMOCARTNOMORE2 – nice try, but Palin is as corrupt as the Washington insiders you whine about. She’s already under investigation for abuse of her office to settle a personal vendetta, and she took millions in federal pork. Pay more attention to the facts about your candidate, not the fantasy.
Posted by: Just The Facts | September 2, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
They know Obama had the option of choosing Hillary for VP which would have been the wise thing to do since she is more qualified than all the others, including him, combined, and is the winner of the People’s Votes.
…………………………………
People think Obama dissed Hillary, but I really do believe that she and Obama have an understanding about this. I don’t think Hillary wanted the vp spot because she plans on running in 2012. If she had taken the offer that would obligate her to that job if he should win for 4 or maybe 8 yrs. She wants to be president not vp. I think people are angry for nothing about this.
Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Hey John – as a TRUE Republican, I just want to thank you for totally blowing the election you old fool! It’s obvious that your just a stupid RINO who purposely wants to lose to the Dems so they can enact there socailist agenda. You suck! We should have had Romney!
Posted by: disgusted in texarkana | September 2, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
So many lies by the right wing
Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard, considers Palin “extremely responsive and smart” and says she is in charge when it comes to in-state services, such as emergencies and natural disasters where the National Guard is the first responder.
But, in an interview with The Associated Press on Sunday, he said he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. The entire operation is under federal control, and the governor is not briefed on situations.
The right wing LOVES to lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Puma No More,
I can forgive Palin as she is not a Dem. I certainly can’t forgive Dems of their treatment of Hillary. McCain’s pick of Palin – priceless. PUMA lives!
Posted by: Beckie | September 2, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Re: the National Guard in Alaska, Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, who is the adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard, “said he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. The entire operation is under federal control, and the governor is not briefed on situations.”
So much for all that supposed National Guard Experience. And even in domestic issues…how many times do you think she’s had to call out the guard in the 20 months she’s been in office? Um…I’m guessing…none. If that would have happened, it would have been in the news at the time and the McCain camp would have been running it up the flagpole today.
Posted by: traveler22 | September 2, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
najma,
As with many thing posted by the right wing being untrue. So Palin being in charge of missile defense
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
A lot of Dems seem to think that business tax and personal tax are two independent streams. Look again. Personal income is part of business expenses – therefore, personal tax originated from business expense. Only the centrist Clintonites seem to understand this. The liberal Dems seem to wage a perpetual class war pitching individual vs. business as us vs. them.
They seem to do well when misery is more visible. They prey on a weakening job market and they even stoop to prey on bad weather(as in thinking God on their side doling out bad weather to punish their opponent). As long as they see a reason to further their immediate causes, they will latch on to any plausible arguments.
As far as Palin goes once they exhaust their attacks and find her still standing, they will begin to address her as “sweetie”. That will be their weapon of last resort.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 2, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
I’m reading that Palin has been governor for 1-1/2 years, and has a 4 month old son. So, out of that 18 months in office, she was pregnant 9 months and now has a newborn, which she is still nursing. So, really, she sounds like she’s only been governor 9 months and rest of the time pre-occupied with hormones & diapers. When you are expecting and then have newborn duties you are NOT capable of carrying a full load at your job (any job). So what is she? Easy on the eyes…no experience in Washington…has no power base to back her up. She’s another Rove puppet. An insult to thinking women.
Posted by: Carole | September 2, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
ryan C: “Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, adjutant general of the Alaska National Guard, considers Palin “extremely responsive and smart” and says she is in charge when it comes to in-state services, such as emergencies and natural disasters where the National Guard is the first responder.
But, in an interview with The Associated Press on Sunday, he said he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. The entire operation is under federal control, and the governor is not briefed on situations.”
Yup, they tell one lie and then all the ditto heads just go and cut and paste it everywhere they can. Do a google on Jame’s original post – you’ll find it word-for-word all over the place. They’re not big on original (or critical) thought at all.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 2, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
No he is playing his cards right I love conventional wisdom. I like his VP very symoblic
Posted by: Gloria | September 2, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Early on in the conversation before Palin started to crack up, Lester referred to Sen. Green as a jealous woman and a cancer. Palin, who knows full well Lyda Green is a cancer survivor, didn’t do what any decent person would do, say, “Bob, that’s going too far.”
But as the conversation moved on, Lester intensified his attack on Green.
Lester questioned Green’s motherhood, asking Palin if the senator cares about her own kids. Palin laughs.
Then Lester clearly sets the stage for what he is about to say by warning his large audience and Palin. He says, “Governor you can’t say
Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Questioning Palin on her experience is not sexist. Questioning her ability to be a good mother while maintaining a career is extremely sexist.
Did anyone here also hear that Obama said his experience running a campaign makes him more qualified to be president than Palin. LOL. He said that his ability to run a campaign budget of 12x the budget of Wasilla, AK makes him more qualified. What a joke. Especially when as a governor she balances a 10 billion dollar budget, which is 100x greater than Obama’s campaign budget.
Posted by: lol | September 2, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
I hope they keep screaming sexism. Please keep screaming it. It makes you look really big.
Posted by: JO | September 2, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Why can’t you hold your candidates to the same standards that your party has set for the last 8 on personal and ethical issues John McCain? You can attack The Clintons and the Edwards for cheating and Kerry for being a war hero, but you can’t even have this poor excuse for a spokeswoman for women live up to your own standards?
This is not a political maverick. This is a political coward and a sign of bad judgment and weak leadership.
Posted by: Anthony | September 2, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
not only are they playing the gender card…. they are trying to play america. wake up america.
——— has anyone else noticed there are more “ethnic” faces on the videos the republicans are showing at the convention or on the stage then there are on the floor…. what hypocracy. – - – - “lets use minorities but not actually have a lot as our delegates. wow thats just sad.
Posted by: sk8boardgrind | September 2, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Good Luck to the PUMA crew. Now they have Palin who will not hesitate to squash women’s rights if ever she got a chance.
The PUMA trash can take their bitterness and ill will to the republican party. Good Riddance.
__________________________________
OBAMA/BIDEN 08
Posted by: Good Luck PUMA | September 2, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
” There they go again ” blaming the media for any bad press against repubican politicians. If Obama had a teenage daughter who was pregnant and unmarried the holier than thou crowd would be working themselves into frenzy of condemnation and judgement against her. However as usual they quickly forgive themselves for all faults and failures and lash out at anyone who questions their rightgeousness. What hypocrisy !!!
Posted by: fool me once | September 2, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Charlene,
Your comments makes no sense. I’m a Hillary supporter who would never vote for a woman who wants to take away my right to control my own body.
Posted by: Jen | September 2, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Gee, Jo, you have to reach pretty low to defend Palin — John Edwards and TUCC? Pish-Tush!
Palin is not only inarguably inexperienced, but she has so much questionable baggage — apparently ignored by McSame in his rush to bring his “soulmate” onto the ticket (watch out Cindy Mcsame, and sorry about that Joe Lie-berman) — that McSame’s mismanagement of his campaign in not properly vetting her becomes more clear with each passing day.
And all the Repubs in Minneapolis are having to do the same kind of “Yoga Moves” that Tucker “Knows No” Bounds and you, Jo, are continually having to do — twisting themselves up into pretzels to try to say something nice and enthusiastic about the ticket!
Still wondering if anyone has “Wednesday” in the “How Long before Palin is gone” pool?!?!!!
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: jackt51 | September 2, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Okay, shame on John MCsame for trying to push off Sara Palin to the American public as a legitimate contender. She has not experience, beauty queen, soccor mom, mayor of 13 people and some reindeer, yeah, I’ll be sure to vote for her right away….lmao all the way to the voting booth.Obama 2008!!!
Posted by: mzbarbj | September 2, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
Gov. Palin has no desire or the power to impose her beliefs on anyone.
And even if she did, McCain will have his hands tied by a Democratic Congress.
I’m not worried one bit. It just means we’ll have Hillary in 4 years instead of 8.
Posted by: Charlene | September 2, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
In 1996, a reporter asks Palin about her intentions for a shake up of government staff: How would she effectively run a city without experienced leaders? “”It’s not rocket science,” Palin said, “It’s $6 million and 53 employees.”
Bwahahahaha
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 2, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Are they really worried about the Dems being sexist?? They had better get ready for the big leagues.
The girl power gladiators are dispatching to take up the Palin candidacy. For feminists there is simply too much at risk with this backwood barbie.
It is going to get a lot hotter in the kitchen.
Posted by: Fasten Your Seat belts | September 2, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Ryan C.
Deadlines for putting names on ballots in coming up quick.
She is so arrogant she will initially accept the nomination. As the pressure of her pathetic lies build over the next few days is when she will crack and run back, tail between her legs, to Alaska
Posted by: Vicki | September 2, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
By Paul Kane
ST. PAUL — Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee who revealed Monday that her 17-year-old daughter is pregnant, earlier this year used her line-item veto to slash funding for a state program benefiting teen mothers in need of a place to live.
Hmmmmm… wonder why she vetoed this one… is it because these young girls did not abstain? and now she thinks they should fend for themselves?
Posted by: lmg | September 2, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
I think Obama’s supporters will be the undoing of his campaign.
One of the first comments here was to again tell PUMAs that BHO doesn’t need us.
Okay, fine. But I live in the battleground state of New Hampshire. We like Sarah Palin. Since the over-50 crowd isn’t on blogs as much as 6th graders, what I do now is just copy the remarks of Obama supporters and show them to my neighbors.
We all think Obama’s supporters are a bunch of vultures.
Obama needs NH. Kerry won it.
But I’m going to do everything I can here in NH to show my neighbors the kind of filth Obama’s campaign wallows in when they don’t think anyone is looking.
Like Al Gore and George Bush, Obama ridicules the candidates with experience, and he gets away with it because of his personality.
However, it’s not John McCain who reminds me of GWB.
BHO reminds me more of Bush every day.
- No experience, but ridicules the experience of others.
- Uses race-baiting in SC after a disastrous primary in NH.
- Picks on the other candidate’s child.
- Hates the Clintons.
Am I missing anything?
New Hampshire, famously, didn’t go for BHO in the primaries.
THEN we saw the Jeremiah Wright tapes.
THEN we heard the bitter guns and gods remark.
THEN we had Obama’s spokesman come right out of the box after SH was picked, with his pathetic slam of smalltown mayors.
SHE’S A GOVERNOR! Just like Kathleen Sebelius, fool.
How come Obama can remember what a GREAT governor KS of KS is, but can’t remember that Gov. Palin IS a governor instead of a mayor???? It’s just out and out disrespect.
I think NH will return to the red column in November, and Sarah Palin is going to be a leader that helps that happen.
So will I.
Posted by: Jan | September 2, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
In Palin you may also be a
getting a VP candidate who
may have been deceiving the
public about her fifth child
and infant son. The make or
break question is whether
she or her duaghter who is
now pregnant is the real
mother of that infant boy.
All other aspects of this
story pale beside this
question.
Posted by: anon | September 2, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
It is Disgrace for America to put extremely LOW educated woman with ancient narrow outlook anywhere close to Presidency.
Woman, who fogot , what Motherhood is ,making kids, doing Nothing for their development, with no Moral standard.
That is complete abuse of American society to see at Praise Mad Woman, gambling politics with sick infant on Campaign trail.
Who did create this?
Oh, McBush. This is the way, how he puts his country first.
My country does NOT need neither crzy woman nor stupid NextBush.
Posted by: Linda,Fl | September 2, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
ANON,
The only person confused is yourself and the other leftwing nuts trying to make this an issue.
“In Palin you may also be a
getting a VP candidate who
may have been deceiving the
public about her fifth child
and infant son. The make or
break question is whether
she or her duaghter who is
now pregnant is the real
mother of that infant boy.
All other aspects of this
story pale beside this
question.
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Jan
Kathleen Sebelius has been a governor for six years and in state politics for 22 years, in a state that has 4 times the population of Alaska
Posted by: jock59801 | September 2, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
The same idiots who are upset about her husband having a DUI over 20 years ago forget Obama was using cocaine during the same time. A fact admitted by Obama
Posted by: nm156 | September 2, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
america first….. um unless you put a traitor on your ticket. more like she is for alaska first. beware of her hidden agenda.
Posted by: sk8boardgrind | September 2, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Really!
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
As always, Obama cites facts in a very selective (and misleading) fashion. For the last two years, Palin has been Governor of Alaska, overseeing 15,000 employees, while Obama has been running for president, overseeing a campaign staff of 2,500. Before that, Palin was mayor of a small town, overseeing a staff of 50, while Obama oversaw an even smaller staff in his Senate office. Neither has any experience overseeing anything like the Federal government (1.8 million employees). So get over it; when it comes to executive experience, Palin is marginally more qualified, but neither of them is even close to being really qualified.
If the media and team Obama keep acting like Palin is substantially less qualified than Obama, they will incite a backlash from women, who have had about enough of the B.S. Whether we agree with the candidates or not, many of us have been on the receiving end of the double standard that has been applied to Hillary and Sarah during this campaign.
Posted by: NJH | September 2, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
The media and Obama camp hates her becuase she’s what the want in a VP pick!
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
Obama is a graduate from Harvard, Senator from Chicago and has proven to be a true leader by inspiring thousands.
He’s ready to lead this nation, just like JFK was ready.
There should be no need to compare Obama with Palin, the first was elected democratically by his party, the will of the people.
The second was the first executive decision of a presidential candidtae, and hopefully his last.
Besides, on his first executive decision he chooses a VP that complements his experience and that would challenge him when needed. In other words, he did what he thought was best for the country, a sign of good judgment.
McCain on the other hand, choose someone that would get him the evangelical votes hoping that it would also get the 18 Million Hillary vote. That was a political decision from the eldest (cancer surviving) presidential candidate, thus a reckless decision and a sign of poor judgment. He’s basically toying with the nation by appointing this girl to the 2nd most important position.
Whatever happed to “Country First”?
Imagine that half way his presidency the 77 year old McCain dies of a heart attack (god forbid), and we end up swearing into office this gun loving, anti-option woman that has never left the country (OK she went to an american base in kwait and germany, thats not leaving the country).
What then?
Scary! no?
That’s the position that McCain left the country with his first decision.
What other evidence do you need?
Obama has prove with his first decision that he is ready to lead this nation to a better future and McCain fumbled on his first executive decision.
Besides, how dare the GOP says that Sarah has International policy experience because Alaska is near Russia or that she can be Commander in Chief because she was head of the Alaskan national guard.
Do they think we are that stupid?
Posted by: Jose from Florida | September 2, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
St. Paul — At 6:30 Monday morning, at a hotel here in St. Paul, a team of senior McCain staffers got word from even more senior staffers that there was news about vice-presidential pick Sarah Palin. Everybody had heard the rumors, spread on The Atlantic and DailyKos websites, that Palin’s fifth child, Trig, born last April, was not really hers — that Trig was really Palin’s 17 year-old daughter’s child, and Palin faked pregnancy to cover up her daughter’s condition. None of that was true, they all knew.
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
Funny how the republicans had no problem with the media vetting Rev Wright as if he were Obama’s vp choice, however now that McLame has made his actual choice for vp they are crying foul about the press looking into her past. Gov Palin chose to put herself in this position and should be fairly scrutinized even if it pushes her off the republican pedestal of self-righteousness.
Posted by: fool me once | September 2, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
The Republicans are claiming Democrats are being sexist when they criticize Sarah Palin’s problems including Troopergate (fire the police commissioner for not firing my sister’s husband), her unmarried, straight pregnant daughter, her husbands DUI, her pothead past, her and husband radical ties to the AIP (who wants Alaska to secede from the Union), and her LACK OF EXPERIENCE? So, does that mean the Republicans are racist for attacking Obama? Of course not. Wasn’t it recent that the McCain camp accussed Obama of playing the race card. What’s going on with McCain? He is just another Karl Rove-Bush-Cheney clone. What happen to Republican family values? I guess human if Republicans make mistakes but a sin if Dems do.
Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
McCain introduced Palin after the Democratic Convention where he saw us democrats as the toast of the town. He knew his goose was cooked. He decided to have a KNEE -JERK REACTION- AND MADE A DECISION WITHOUT THINKING IT THROUGH. I don’t know Palin but John Mccain is a bafoon and not too bright. He also knew he has NOTHING TO OFFER MIDDLE AMERICA. So he tried to use Palin. What other knee-jerk things will he do. Try to start a war with Russia–John McCain has bad judgement period. The people that are upset the most are other Republicans!! Where are their comments in this article because I have heard some. The Obama camp has nothing to do with McCain’s pick–McCain want to start trouble with the Democrats since he has nothing to offer Middle America. And again I say Ms. Palin you are being used by McCain.
Posted by: lowes4321 | September 2, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
while Michelle Obama’s style and performance are winning plaudits on the campaign trail, a little-reported business interest of Mrs Obama’s has opened her husband up to one of the criticisms that politicians fear most – the taint of hypocrisy.
She has just been re-elected to the board of an Illinois food-processing company, a position she took up two years ago to gain experience of the private sector.
And the biggest customer for the pickles and peppers produced by Treehouse Foods is the retail giant Wal-Mart, the world’s largest corporation and the bête noire of American liberals, including Sen Obama, for its employment practices, most notably its refusal to recognise trade unions.
As the Illinois senator prepared to join the presidential fray late last year, he threw his weight behind the union-backed campaign against Wal-Mart. He declared that there was a “moral responsibility to stand up and fight” the company and “force them to examine their own corporate values”.
According to the couple’s tax returns, Mrs Obama earned $51,200 for her work as a non-executive director on Treehouse’s board last year, on top of the $271,618 salary she was paid as a vice-president of the University of Chicago Hospitals.
She also received 7,500 Treehouse stock options, worth a further $72,375, as she did the previous year, when she banked a $45,000 salary from the company.
There is an apparent contradiction between Sen Obama’s political calculation to join the Wal-Mart-bashing lobby, and his wife’s profitable role with a company that makes money from Wal-Mart
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
So Democrats are being sexist for attacking Sarah Palin? Does that mean Republicans (who have a history of blatant bigotry) attacks on Barack Obama are racist? Of course not! First of all, Sarah Palin is not qualified to be VP anyway. Second, her troubles are her own doing. She caused Troopergate by firing her the police commissioner for not firing her sister’s husband! Her heterosexual daughter was the one who got pregnant while not married while Sarah Palin and John McCain blocked sex education funding! Her husband got a DUI and it was Palin who admitted to inhaling unlike Bill Clinton marijuanna! It is her and her husband that support the AIP who wants Alaska to secede from the Union! It’s Sarah Palin who said U.S. soldiers should only be used for American jihads or holy wars! You know ‘a task from God’ before sending troops to battle! Shame on the Republicans for playing the gender card while criticizing Obama for supposedly using the race card! I guess McCain is more like Bush than I thought. He is obviously using Karl Rove as his adviser.
Posted by: Mark | September 2, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
obama camp is at it again! they did it to hillary and they are doin it to sarah.
Sen. Joe Biden (D-DE):
Biden On Palin: “She’s Good Looking.”
if that is not sexist what is?
Posted by: Average Joe | September 2, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Tony Rezko, a long time friend and fund-raiser for Obama, was indicted last fall on federal charges that accuse him of demanding kickbacks from companies seeking state business. When asked about his friend, Obama said, “I’ve never done any favors for him.” This turned out to be a lie, as evidence turned up proving that Obama had written letters to city and state officials praising Rezko’s business practices.
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
I never realized how shrewd and smart John McCain could be. In selecting Sarah Palin, Governor of Alaska, as his running mate he dared the Democrats to make the case, as they have, that she’s not qualified because she “lacks foreign policy experience.” He understands that when the media decides to investigate Governor Palin they will be forced to conclude that she actually has more foreign policy experience than Obama. As Susan pointed out below, she was in Germany visiting wounded troops long before Barack sought to speak at the Brandenburg Gate. She is a Commander-in-Chief of the Alaska National Guard and those troops have been in combat.
So, if you are running Barack’s campaign, you don’t want to renew the focus on your own candidate’s zero experience as an elected executive do you? Clueless to the concept of irony the Barack team is trying to attack Palin’s “paltry” experience. They did this with a straight face. Did anyone think to check Barack Obama’s resume? As the media starts asking questions of Palin, which they have refused to ask of Barack, the discrepancy will become apparent and Barack will find himself in the spotlight. If the standard applies to Palin it must apply to Barack. Unlike Obama, Palin actually knows something about balancing a budget, getting the streets fixed, and going after corrupt politicians and lobbyists.
Barack? He funneled money to the likes of Tony Rezko and did nothing to ensure that constituents in his district living in sub-standard housing were protected. And Barack’s one foray into “management” as the lackey of Bill Ayers on the Annenberg Challenge will be shown to have been a corrupt, insider trading scheme in which he helped steer money to cronies and ignored genuine education reform. That’s why is campaign is fighting so viciously to keep the media from looking at that part of his cuddling with unrepentant terrorist, Bill Ayers.
Posted by: Jesse | September 2, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Jesse,
Zzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Wake me up when you have a real argument. Who cares if Obama was/is associated with Mr. Ayers? It has nothing to do with his campaign and what kind of President he will be. I’m sure EVERY politician is associated with someone radical, whether it be left or right.
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
sanddy, who cares. This is old news.
Posted by: d | September 2, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
Hey D,
Ite relevant when you all this is out there and the media ignores it and relishes in Palin’s daughter
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
OBAMA “Change”
in September 2004, in the heat of his campaign for the U.S. Senate, Obama said (according to an AP report) that even though Bush had “bungled his handling of the war,” simply pulling out of Iraq “would make things worse.” What does he say today? what will he say tomorrow?
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Obama is like a guy who places bets after the roulette wheel stops spinning.
Almost as soon as the war began in March 2003, Obama had second thoughts about his opposition to it. Watching the dramatic footage of the toppling of Saddam’s statue in Baghdad, and then the President’s speech aboard the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln, “I began to suspect,” he would write later in his autobiographical The Audacity of Hope (2006), “that I might have been wrong.”
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
While bashing of Wal-Mart’s labor practices in public, Obama has been profiting from their business through the money his wife made as a member of the board of directors for a company that produces food for the mega-corporation
Posted by: sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Sanddy,
The media has not been “strangely quiet” about any of these topics or associations. It is OLD NEWS and you seem to be the only one who still cares about it. Do you honestly think you are telling anyone anything new?
Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Wow its amazing how many respectable republicans are putting there reputation on the line for this election.
Is it sexist to question the experience of a person who has less then two years as experience as governor of Alaska?
If you want to compare her experience to Obama’s then that is fair. To call it sexist is obviously a strategic talking point.
Whatever happened to integrity?
Posted by: Dan | September 2, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
People tend to choose houses of worship because they feel familiar and comfortable to them.
That said, the same should be true for Barack Hussein Obama. But Obama and his family didn’t join just any church. He became a member of a militant black nationalist one, Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ. And Obama is not a passive member of this church; it the single largest beneficiary of his charitable giving.
According to its website, the Trinity United Church of Christ is “a congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.” This organization worships things African to a degree far greater than they do Jesus Christ, and gives the impression of being a “separatist” church in the same vein as do certain supremacist “white brethren” churches – or even Louis Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam. This raises eyebrows regarding what Obama’s church actually teaches. If Obama is true to his faith and embraces what his church teaches, we are right to wonder if the mind-set of Barack Obama reflects the church’s beliefs. After all, Obama has stated that his spiritual adviser and mentor is his church’s pastor, Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr.; a man who has made some very controversial comments including anti-Israel remarks that refer to the “injustice and the racism under which the Palestinians have lived because of Zionism.”
And it appears that Obama’s beliefs are very similar to that of Rev. Wright’s in this statement Obama made before he was a presidential candidate, “Nobody has suffered more than the Palestinian people.”
Obama has said Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright is the man that got him interested in politics. He speaks of him as his political father and even his surrogate father. In his 1993 memoir “Dreams from My Father,” Obama recounts in vivid detail his first meeting with Wright in 1985. Furthermore, Obama wrote how the pastor warned him that getting involved with Trinity might turn off other black clergy because of the church’s radical reputation. And though Obama asserts he and Rev. Wright have not recently spoke one-on-one, he does check with his pastor before making any bold political moves.
The following is from a pdf file of sermon from Obama’s “spiritual mentor” as published in October 2003 issue of the Trinity United Church of Christ’s publication, “The Trumpet.” (Published by the Reverend’s daughter.) The sermon is really a wide ranging diatribe which includes, among other things, calls for US divestiture in Israel. But even amidst the Reverend’s many crackpot and racist statements, this one jumped out:
Maybe I Missed Something!
A Message From our PASTOR, Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.
In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01. White America and the Western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just “disappeared” as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring Black concerns.
It is no secret that Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright courts nefarious people that hold anti-Semitic, anti-white prejudges and beliefs that are un-American. But the worst of the worse is his close friendship with Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, a man whose racist and virulent anti-Semitic and anti-White views are well known. In 2007 Rev. Wright honored Farrakhan with the Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr. Trumpeter Award for lifetime achievements. In the church’s magazine, Trumpet Newsmagazine, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright described Farrakhan as a man that “truly epitomized greatness.”
Maybe for Obama’s spiritual adviser, Farrakhan “epitomized greatness.” But for most Americans, Louis Farrakhan is one of the world’s most controversial black leaders. Epitomizing racism, particularly in the form of anti-Semitism, Farrakhan condemns almost all other races and religions. This anti-Semitic and anti-White figure has compiled an awesome record of offensive statements, calling Judaism “a gutter religion,” the Pope the “Antichrist” and Adolph Hitler “a wickedly great man.”
Farrakhan is well known for his hate-filled rhetoric. He has called whites “blue-eyed devils” and the “antichrist” while describing the white race as “the product of a deranged black scientist’s experiments.” He claimed crack cocaine was a CIA plot to enslave blacks. The Nation of Islam uses the Koran as their basic text, as does the traditional Islamic religion and some of Farrakhan’s views are shared by Islamic extremists. Farrakhan has described Jews as “bloodsuckers.” and even denigrated the Holocaust by falsely attributing it to Jewish cooperation with Hitler — “They helped him get the Third Reich on the road.”
While Farrakhan’s history is a rancid stew of lies, just last week this black Muslim leader endorsed Obama for president. Although Obama claims Farrakhan does not campaign for him, on February 24th Farrakhan spent much of his nearly two-hour speech praising Obama to an estimated crowd of 20,000 supports in Chicago.
Also, in an ABC interview last year, Farrakhan said that “if Obama was avoiding controversial black leaders like himself, Rev. Al Sharpton, and Rev. Jesse Jackson for fear of alienating white voters it would be an acceptable price to pay for an Obama victory.”
In a time where racism is still an issue but miles and miles ahead of the past, how can we be overzealous in our judgment and prosecution of one type of racism and not another?
People don’t want to put a political coalition into the White House that includes Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan.
And I think it is fair to assume that Obama’s world view is colored by these racist figures.
Posted by: Sanddy | September 2, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Am following the RNC convention and heard that ex-NY Mayor Guiliani got bumped from yesterday to today, from today to tomorrow. Will he get bumped tomorrow too?
Wonder if he is still entrenched in his infamous ‘sweetheart exchange deals’ where he gets his crimes committed by convicted felon in exchange for lesser penalty without ever being suspected?
Wonder if the reason why he is bumped is because he is in the midst of one of his ‘sweetheart exchange deals’ and solicit his protege ex-NYPD commissioner Kerik who may be serving 140 years of jail time for mob-related activities for such a deal?
Wonder which opponents is he targeting to rid of and will he use Kerik’s mob connections?
Rumor has it that if he is able to pull off murders, the RNC may give him the VP spot and will come up with an excuse to rid of S. Palin, who is the best thing that has happened to the RNC by far, hmmm….
As one of Guiliani’s many sharp critics, wonder if I should worry about my family’s safety in the next couple of days too?
Wondering out loud….
Posted by: francine223 | September 2, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Obamas so called better judgment
1. Rev. Wright 20 years listening to hate speech.
2. Bill Ayers terrorist supporter and friend of Obama
3. Tony Rezko currently on trial for corruption and fundraiser for Obama.
He accomplished next to nothing as a senator and so far his only claim to “judgement” comes from a statement opposing the Iraq war when his words wouldnt affect his office and later said in his book The Audacity of Hope “that I might have been wrong.” ref. to the Iraq war
Posted by: Sanddy | September 2, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
I love how the Obamabots insist on belittle Palin (probably mostly because she is a woman) specifically stating she has no experience and refusing to acknowledge that governors have more experience than Jr Senators like Obama not to mention all the other stuff Palin has done. No matter the obamabot lies, Palin remains far more experience than Obama.
Posted by: chattyway | September 2, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
How do we know Obama graduated from Harvard? His high school grades barely qualified him for a community college, people that work with him after supposedly graduating claim he is basically a moron, and Obama refuses to release his school record. Oh yeah, and then there is that little problem of Obama lying about everything like that nonsense of him claiming he was a college professor.
Posted by: chattyway | September 2, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Sarah Palin and her one scandal short of Jerry Springer family have made our presidential election the laughing stock of the world. She’s a badly-written episode of Desperate Housewives. It is time for this woman to step down,for the good of the country, and get back to being a mother to her family.
Posted by: Carla | September 2, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Carole to state such nonsense that basically women can’t be anything more than a mother, you would have to be a guy in drag.
Posted by: chattyway | September 2, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Rezko is but one of Obama’s corrupt buddies that Obama abused taxpayer money for to repay his buddies for helping Obama out.
Posted by: chattyway | September 2, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
Bristol’s hubby to be is going to the Convention. Palin thinks it to be with the big, happy family. It’s not! Bubba of the North has hired an agent and is only going to Minnesota to see the agent he has hired. He’s trying to line up lucrative interview deals with either the Jerry Springer Show, Geraldo, Nancy Grace or a few other shows. If this does not work out, he’ll threaten not to marry Bristol unless mama makes it financially worth it.
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Good grief! We aren’t supposed to question McCain about anything because he was a POW and now we aren’t supposed to question Palin because that would be sexist. Since when is questioning experience sexist? They can question Obama’s experience and that’s ok but we can’t question Palin?
Perhaps McCain should listen to his VP nominee about making sexist complaints:
During the primary Sarah Palin chided Hillary Clinton for complaining about sexism.
“She does herself a disservice to even mention it, really,” Palin said. “When I hear a statement like that coming from a woman candidate with any kind of perceived whine about that excess criticism, or maybe a sharper microscope put on her, I think, ‘Man, that doesn’t do us any good, women in politics, or women in general, trying to progress this country,’” Palin said. “I don’t think it bodes well for her.”
Posted by: Sandy | September 2, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
John McCain”s record on family planning.
He voted against requiring health care plans to cover birth control (3/22/03).
He voted against comprehensive, medically accurate *** education (7/25/06).
He voted against international family planning funding (3/14/96).
He voted against funding to prevent teen and unintended pregnancies (3/17/05).
He voted against public education for emergency contraception (3/17/05).
And he voted against restoring Medicaid funding that could be used for family planning for low-income women (3/17/05).
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Did Palin Really Fight The “Bridge To Nowhere?”
A LIAR FROM DAY ONE!
Sarah Palin, in her first news conference stated that she was against the “Bridge to Nowhere” from day one. Republicans have been heavily touting Sarah Palin’s reformist credentials, with this supposed opposition to Alaska’s “Bridge to Nowhere” But how hard did she really fight the project? Not very, it seems. Here’s what she told the Anchorage Daily News on October 22, 2006, during the race for the governor’s seat (via Nexis):
5. “Would you continue state funding for the proposed Knik Arm and Gravina Island bridges?”
“Yes. I would like to see Alaska’s infrastructure projects built sooner rather than later. The window is now–while our congressional delegation is in a strong position to assist.”
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
One thing needs to be made clear. Republicans are having a lot of discussions about Sarah Palin not just dems. I’m surrounded by lots of republicans from family, to people on campus, to strangers and they all have concerns about this woman. These are die hard Bush loving republicans, so I think is wishful thinking that it’s just the dems.
Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
I think Palin was chosen for historical value, as the first republican female to be a vice presidential candidate, but it was done in haste. From a female standpoint, I do not think she is exceptionally educated or has remarkable intellegence. There are some relevant points to this years election concerning Palin, however. Her household is not perfect and reflects a more realistic ideal of the American family. Americans are individualists and truly do not have long term relationships, and the idea we see is that the president and any other governing official has a the stereotypical household ie spouse, 2 kids.This is not true at all. I personally can’t wait for a single parent to appear in the elections. Palin’s disclosure as far as job performance should be considered a resume. I hope that we as Americans can focus on the issues that concern us all, based on what’s relevant.
Posted by: Jen | September 2, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
It was just pointed out to me that Palin herself had a shot gun wedding.
Palin “eloped” with her husband Todd, in 1988. Just EIGHT months later, their first son, Track, was born.
Posted by: Jack | September 2, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
It’s weird: I look at the GOP Convention on TV and it looks like the night of the living dead. I mean all I see are a bunch of white-haired wrinkly old men and women. Not only is their hair white, almost all of the people are white. I was wondering if this were a meeting of the Ku Klux Klan I heard about years ago. I did not see one black, red, yellow or brown face at all. It this the new Republican party or the Old?
Posted by: rhbate | September 2, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Wow! Now it’s the democrats who are trying to swiftboat a woman just like Hillary Clinton! I guess it is just politics as usual and a change for the worse!
Posted by: mccollegemom | September 2, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
I was for McCain 8 years ago but he’s aged noticably and it appears to me he’s changed his position on many issues and can no longer be considered any kind of maverick – which was a positive trait. Instead, he now stands firmly with a standard Republican agenda. And, given his choice of VP – a very poor choice I might add, I can’t back him now. Time for a change – vote OBAMA.
Posted by: gunrunner | September 2, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
Too much pressure is going to be hitting Bristol. She has lots to plan for and consider – I believe it irresponsible for McCain to ask and Mrs. Palin to accept that her daughter be held up to the scrutiny she will be exposed to. This will change her life – I hope for the better, but wouldn’t roll those dice with my child.
Posted by: zoom24 | September 2, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Who cares about these. One thing is sure clear: Obama stinks!
Posted by: tiger | September 2, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
I thought things would become so boring once Hillary was SHOVED aside, but noooo. Come on, Demcrats, admit it; that was one fast-curve-ball from the Republicans. I still feel disillusioned after how much I believed and put into the Democratic Party, but I am watching and realizing that the weird, sexist extreme left who suddenly became concerned with RACE when there were so many other concerns on the table (that Hillary was ready, with a plan to solve) are facing the masters of the Old Dirty Politics game that Obama criticizes while using. Republicans are at the mound against the Democrats. And that Biden pick did not excite the Democrats the way the Palin pick excited the Republicans. Write this down in your journals people, because in this campaign we are making a UNIT full of history. Pay attention; these are extremely interesting and culturally significant times.
Posted by: irma | September 2, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
the republican convention looks like a local meeting at a nurseing home..wow what an out of touch out of time party they are… no more old politics of give to the rich and screw the poor. no way no how no mccain. there were a few younger people there but they were with there parents. just doing what they were told.
Posted by: tom | September 2, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
What did Palin do as governor….for one balanced the budget, and spoke out against EARMARKS….you know the taxpayer money that certain Senators Obama abuse to repay their corrupt friends or get their American hating wives raises. As soon as Obama became Senator he gave a big taxpayer’s earmark to Michelle’s bosses and they nearly tripled Michelle’s pay in return. I don’t want my tax money going to get Obama’s wife a raise.
Posted by: chattyway | September 2, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
chattyway—um yes she got alot of earmarks, but i know you republicans will never admit mistakes.
Posted by: tom | September 2, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Honestly, how many normal intelligent people would vote for a Senator abusing tax payer’s money to get their wife a raise like Obama has? How do you Obamabots justify this type of cronism?
Posted by: chattyway | September 2, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
Tom, can come up with any abuse of taxpayers money that palin supposedly has done? Go ahead and say no dear…because I know you can’t. The obama guys hate honest women and will do anything to smear them over nonsense….just look at them attack Palins cute little 5 month old Trig, and the attacks on her teenage daughter. You guys are really sick.
Posted by: chattyway | September 2, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
chattyway—ok you come up with facts about obamas earmarks and i will coem up with hers. also why dont you check out how she wants alaska to seperate from america she is a member of alaskan independence party. and lets talk about mccain and his keating five connections that was ahuge earmark.
Posted by: tom | September 2, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm
chattyway— i will check back tommorow i know you have to listen to rush limburger to find your “facts” so i will check back after you listen to him tommorow. i will go get real hard facts ok. i know republicans hate facts and the truth but you will get over it.
Posted by: tom | September 2, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
Tom…whatever…what a bunch of nonsense. I already know the facts and I am sorry but the facts show that only an idiot would vote for crooks and Obama is a crook.
Posted by: chattyway | September 3, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Tom..you are hopeless. The Alaska Indepence whatever was made up of many different people. They were united in wanting a vote in Alaska whether they wanted to be part of the US. Many people get confused…..and automatically jump to the wrong conclusion that all of the members wanted to succeed from Alaska….this was not the case many just wanted the vote and to put the issue to rest permanently, others wanted to remain in the union but wanted federal laws changed in Alaska you know like the environmental nutjobs that realize that the Anwar province really has no environmental creatures to protect and that drilling for oil and Alaska can work together without harming the environment unneccarily. BTW, nice attempt to draw attention away from Obama abusing taxpayer funds for earmarks to get his wife a big fat raise….but I won’t allow it to drop…and voters shouldn’t forget that Obama is nothing more than a conman.
Posted by: chattyway | September 3, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am
Why is the Republican convention not representative of the country? It looks like an exclusive country club.
Posted by: JJ | September 3, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Yea, yea I know McCain is a POW and Sarah is a woman. Not allowed to make statements or ask questions. Learn to like it.
Soon it will be a religious condemnation to suggest that Palin is anything but pure. A theological Dictatorship.
Posted by: Thinking | September 3, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
Maverick*Maverick 2008
Let them play the sexist card.
Posted by: McCain/Palin 08' | September 3, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
This lady is a ditz. A journalism degree from Idaho (no offense Vandal alumni) is all the education she ever had. Now with McLame who only got into college with daddy’s help and graduated at the bottom of his class, you have a dream ticket for the stupid. America needs smart leaders more than ever.
BTW the Repub convention looks like a morgue.
Posted by: ReturnoftheFly | September 3, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am
There are a significant amount of articles from the mainstream media questioning Palin’s maternity decisions, the decisions of her daughter, and comments on her good looks. When can we talk about the issues? As a woman and former supporter of Hillary I am outraged!!!!
Posted by: j. | September 3, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am
I do believe the pregnancy thing has gone little far, but that is the media’s fault, not Obama’s. In fact, if anyone is to be blamed it should be McCain for throwing a complete unknown at us with only two months to get to know her. Of course the scrutiny will be hypersensitive, what did they expect? That we’d vote for someone we don’t know? That is another hypocrisy in their nomination: republicans still claim to not know Obama after this god awful long campaign and then expect us to be Sarah’s ‘soulmate’ after three days.
Posted by: Rove, Davis, Eskew | September 3, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am
As for Palin’s good looks, she is attractive; deny it. And it isn’t only Biden that thinks so, but Rush, her friends in the Alaskan Independence Party, McCain and I’d wager just about anyone you ask. Should women be ashamed of their beauty? No. Does acknowledging that make someone a sexist? Not if it’s done respectably, and Rush calling her a ‘babe’ may have gone too far.
As for making it about the politics, I agree. It is high time we talk policy and issues, unfortunately McCain has attempted to make this a referendum on anything other than issues as he backs Bush 90% of the time. Now he wants to make it about gender.
Posted by: Rove, Davis, Eskew | September 3, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am
hi americans…obama is the greatest to happen to american and destined to mk a change..amazingly you all dnt kw how great obama is outside america..germans are amazin cynist to charisma and speeches abut more and more germans are been upto obama..ghanaians are doin like wise and tht showsthe new image yet to picked by america and its supremacy..if maericans want the america of lincoln,clinton and wht martin luther king routed for..then u hav a messiah in u…and please it isnt about him but abiut you..he siad it all..it is about color…americans…it is about who can…a better life for a better world..it can only tk a discernin bein to vote for obama.
Posted by: carl | September 3, 2008, 5:50 am 5:50 am
WHAT does this choice say about MCCAIN’S JUDGMENT?? It tells me he is NO MAVERICK! He CAVED under pressure from CHARLIE BLACK and the right wing and did not choose Joe Lieberman who certainly IS EXPERIENCED! Instead he chose PALIN who ADMITS she has no interest in foreign policy!! No opinion on Iraq!! He was making a POLITICAL decision, going for his base and Hillary voters. Forget the COUNTRY’S WELFARE if he should die in office – NO, THIS IS THE ANTITHESIS of a MAVERICK!! THIS IS A COWARD who won’t even stand up to Charlie Black!!! HOW can he be trusted to stand up for AMERICA if he is THAT WEAK and MALEABLE??? I am a Republican and deeply disgusted. He met her only once before for 15 mins and found a soulmate and partner!!
Posted by: Lindaa | September 3, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
Why are some of you saying McCain caved into pressure? Mccain never even said he was going to choose Leiberman. tHE MEDIA SAID IT, ON PURPOSE. OBAMA (THE CHANGE CANDIDATE) CHOSE A WASHED UP WASHINGTON INSIDER FOR HIS VP.. WHO REALLY CAVED INTO TO PRESSURE? I WOULD SAY THE COMMUNITY ORGANIZER DID.
Posted by: joseph | September 3, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am
So the media is biased because they are digging up negative things about Palin? This wouldn’t have happened if the McCain campaign had made a more thoughtful choice. They instead seem to have made a snap decision out of desperation that is beginning to haunt them. The Obama campaign isn’t making sexist attacks…it’s the media that are out there pointing out flaws they have unconvered. Flaws that McCain would have known had they property vetted Palin. The McCain camp just needs to look in the mirror when looking where to place the blame.
Posted by: Dawn | September 3, 2008, 7:23 am 7:23 am
You chose some great quotes there to completely not illustrate the point. I believe the sexism comes from an immediate decision to pounce on Gov. Palin’s child-rearing abilities. Biden’s quote was sexist and disappointing – as a fan of Biden’s, I was deeply disturbed that her looks would be used as a way to belittle her experience. On the other hand, Obama’s quote about running his campaign being comparable to Palin running Alaska is laughable at best, but not sexist. Although, I must say, I have seen more sexism in the blogosphere from so-called liberals than I have ever seen from conservatives in my life. I’m really scared by the left wing right now.
Posted by: Deidra | September 3, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am
Yes,,,Of course, McCain is playing the gender card, just so he can use the word, “sexist” towards Dem. when there are just on the Reps side. He is using her as a shield. the sly fox saw how Hillary and woman supporters divided the Dem. camp. He hopes by using a woman it will revive his own camp which it has. Palin is just a fresher, newer version of the same issue and same politics. As VP she will do as she is told to do. Obama/Biden
Posted by: braith | September 3, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am
What in the world is going wrong in a country like America. We have a great man in Mr. McCain who has a proven record of being a man who believes in this country & is in the know as to what is going on world wide. We have a woman nominated for VP with a great history not only in the political arena but has a great set of family values who is REAL. These two candidates represent what is REAL in AMERICAN & some people want to complain about it!
Posted by: Tom | September 3, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am
If the Republicans are trying to play the gender card, it certainly is working on me. I’ve been a Democrat all my life. I was sickened by the way Democrats treated Hillary, and I am sickened by the way they are attacking Sarah Palin. Why do I owe loyalty to a party that clearly shows little respect for women? I realize the Republicans are trying to exploit the anger of Democratic women. At the same time, I applaud the fact that Republicans don’t seem to have a problem with a woman in the White House. Conservatives have treated Palin with far more respect than many Democrats treated Clinton. I was going to stay home in November. With the nomination of Sarah Palin, I will cast my vote for the Republicans.
Posted by: Another Sarah | September 3, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
It is insulting that McCain brought a woman on to his ticket who has such little experience. He could have chosen better…
Posted by: Erica | September 3, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
The McCain campaign is using Palin as a political distraction. Their campaign announced her daughter’s pregnancy knowing that the media will jump on the issue, thus garnering sympathy from Americans. The political strategy of making the media the enemy has worked in the past and McCain is trying to keep that strategy alive. I don’t care about her Palin’s daughter, I don’t care about her alleged flip-flop on the “Bridge to Nowhere”, and I don’t care that she was a mayor of a town of less than 9000 people. I do care if she can prove herself to America. The McCain campaign is trying to shove Palin down our throats and any challenging questions about Palin is met with the gender card response or contempt (ask Campbell Brown of CNN). The republican convention was like a sea of white people. How can the media demand Obama to appeal to whites when that request is not expected of McCain with regards to people of color? I heard nothing about our economy last night, the energy crisis, or restoring our nation to its good standings around the world. All I heard is a partisan cry for either your’re republican or unpatriotic. McCain will not win the election with conservatives only. Last night’s convention did not appeal to anyone other than neocons. Lieberman tried to bridge the party gap, but he can’t be trust because he looked right into the camera and lied to America about Obama not having a record of reaching across the isle to create change (Obama’s role in nuclear proliferation, ethics reform, state version of earned-income tax credit in the Illinois senate obviously don’t count for Lieberman). McCain and Palin have not earned my vote.
Posted by: Nik | September 3, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Maybe the reports we get over her in England are not the full reports, but I have seen repeated reports where Obama has said “people’s families are off-limits” – What exactly has he said against Palin’s daughter that has you all up in arms? Obama does not control the media as far as I am aware but I could be mistaken – is this ia case of only in America?
Posted by: Nu | September 3, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Obama has no executive experience. The gall to question Palin’s exper. AND . . . I’m am still waiting for this info from Mr Obama. Hey wants my vote; I want this info:
(1) your Occidental College records
(2) your Columbia College records
(3) your Columbia Thesis paper
(4) your Harvard College records
(5) your Selective Service Registration
(6) your medical records
(7) your Illinois State Senate records
(8) your Illinois State Senate schedule
(9) your Law practice client list
(10) a Certified Copy of your original Birth certificate
(11) your embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth
(12) your Harvard Law Review articles that were published
(13) your University of Chicago scholarly articles
(14) your Record of baptism
Posted by: Gayle | September 3, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Of course the republicans are playing the gender card.
…and I for one find it DISCUSTING !!!!
I they think for one minute that I will vote for a person just because they have a vagina, they are not only discusting but STUPID.
This woman is NOWHERE near a Hillary Clinton. They are TOTAL opposites on the issues.
The republican party just blew ANY chance of getting Clinton supporters !!!!
Posted by: MsKay | September 3, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Experience without good judgement = incompetence!
Dont believe me. Just think Bush! Dumb is as dumb does!
Obama 08
Posted by: 8yearsoffear | September 3, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Man the republicans are desperate. You have to wonder – where is their dignity?
Posted by: Not Fooled | September 3, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Has anybody ever asked Barack Obama can he bring up his two kids and be president of the United States? They’re asking can she be vice president and be a mother. Where are the feminists?
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Of Course they are.
They play every card they can get their little greedy hands on.
THey are the party of lies, deceit, and fraud, and they fooled the american people with Bush’s fraudlection last time and are doing it again with McCain/palin
The GOP is the worst that humanity has to offer.
period.
Posted by: FormerRepub | September 3, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
John McCain is 72 years old and this unknown woman would literally be a heartbeat away from being president and leader of the free world. Please tell me what is NOT insane about this picture?
Posted by: DaveM | September 3, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
If Gov. Palin doesnt care about forgein policy or Iraq then how will she keep the country safe? The GOP is huge on talk of protecting the Country, but then they pick someone that doesnt care what the terrorist will try to do to america. Im sorry but that is scary and stupid. We dont know anything about this lady or her family besides her daughter is pregant. I cant vote for republicans this time around, because McCain just showed his true judgement. The VP is suppose to be someone that is ready to step in the postion of the POTUS in case something happend to the president. If she is one sided on every issue or doesnt care about what our enemys are doing then she doenst need to be no where near the white house.
What the GOP also doenst get is all of the Women that voted for hillary clinton wants her in the white house not someone that we dont know anything about. I dont like how they are playing the sexist card to get votes.
JILL
Posted by: JILL | September 3, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
The lefties are puzzled. They feel like the prize was in their grasp, but now it might slip away because of their screwing Hillary.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 3, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
It seems to me that all of this nonsense is just more of Operation Chaos.
What really bothers me is that the Republicans are going to put both Bristol and Levi (the boy who is the father)on display at the convention. What kind of people would put two teenagers in a difficult position on public display like that? Who could approve of such a monstrous political tactic? As a parent I am appalled. I’ve never heard of anything so misguided in my life! How could any truly decent person vote for McCain or Palin with the way THEY are handling her daughter’s pregnancy? Sarah Palin isn’t a feminist, not if she is capable of doing such a profoundly embarrassing thing to her own daughter just to make a political statement. Sarah Palin is anti-woman, obviously.
Shame on the Republicans.
Posted by: A.L.L. | September 3, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Dawn’s comments (7:23) remind me of how some people claim that rape victims “asked for it.” I am so bemused by the confusing stand that many in the media and left-wing blogs are taking on this woman – NOT her experience, but her personal life and her children – that I’m waiting to hear again about how mean-spirited and into the politics of personal destruction the RIGHT is. (Hello Robert Bork, Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice — and on, and on, and on.) The media have spent more time digging up dirt on this woman in the last 5 days than they have in any real vetting on Obama (or John Edwards, for Pete’s sake) in 2 years! I’d had enough of what was thrown at Ms Clinton, and I’m no feminist, but this is absolutely ridiculous and pathetic and cruel – not to mention mean-spirited and hypocritical. I can’t imagine anything but this reflecting badly on Obama/Biden, and that makes me sad, because I DON’T believe it’s them doing it. The far-left has gone off the deep end and the media is running close behind them with their microphones and notepads. Could we PLEASE get back to the issues?
Posted by: Sue | September 3, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Has anybody ever asked Barack Obama can he bring up his two kids and be president of the United States? They’re asking can she be vice president and be a mother. Where are the feminists?
Posted by: GoUSA247 | Sep 3, 2008 11:47
*******************
I’m a feminist, and I supported Hillary Clinton. I was planning on voting for McCain until he chose Sarah Palin. I, too, am asking how she can be a VP and be the mother of four children (her oldest is now an adult), one of whom is pregnant and one of whom has Down’s Syndrome. I ask this question as a woman, because I could never put my daughter in such a position or allow anyone else to oversee the upbringing of my special needs child. This isn’t an issue of feminism. It’s an issue of parental responsibility.
Posted by: A.L.L. | September 3, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
A.L.L. posts “I’m a feminist, and I supported Hillary Clinton. I was planning on voting for McCain until he chose Sarah Palin. I, too, am asking how she can be a VP and be the mother of four children (her oldest is now an adult), one of whom is pregnant and one of whom has Down’s Syndrome. I ask this question as a woman, because I could never put my daughter in such a position or allow anyone else to oversee the upbringing of my special needs child. This isn’t an issue of feminism. It’s an issue of parental responsibility.”
(Even when your children are adults, you are still their mother. She is the mother of 5.) Maybe her daughter is cut from the same cloth as her mother, and is prepared to take responsibility for her actions, and does not want her mother to shrink back from this call because of her daughter’s situation. Perhaps the young lady sees the big picture, and is willing to take the temporary heat, rather than live with knowing her behavior caused a dream their entire family could have realized to be abandoned. Should no one – man or woman – be allowed to be in an elected position, or any job, for that matter, if they have a special-needs child?
I’m sorry, your comments just don’t make sense, especially coming from a feminist. What you would do would be your choice. Why not afford these two women the same courtesy?
Posted by: Sue | September 3, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
I say again..Has anybody ever asked Barack Obama can he bring up his two kids and be president of the United States? They’re asking can she be vice president and be a mother. Where are the feminists?
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
To Sue and GOUSA247:
You can both try to lay claim to the Feminist postion all you want but I still say it isn’t a Feminmist issue. It’s a parental responsibiloity issue and an ethical issue. You both think you’ve got truly decent people cornered on the feminism issues, but you are very wrong. Sarah Palin is anti-woman or she wouldn’t have exposed her daughter to such a bizarre situation. Political power is worthless if you can’t be a good and thoughtful parent. So rave on all you want to.
Posted by: A.L.L. | September 3, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Liberals are finding themselves critical of Sarah…. a woman’s choice to raise children and earn a living, calling it bad parenting. Maybe it is because the Dem’s have no one like Sarah. If Sarah was a dem none of this would be an issue. Where are the Feminist? I am just trying to understand. You can not have it both ways. I have no clue how to vote? Where are the Feminist?
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Thanks, A.L.L. I think I will rave on. So take out the phrase, “especially coming from a feminist,” from my earlier comment, and answer the questions. Particularly the one about giving these two women the courtesy of making their own choices. Not to mention the one about whether a person with a special needs child should ever hold public office.
I don’t care if you’re a feminist or not. Or whether you are Republican, Democrat, Independent, male or female, black or white. You’re right – this is a parental responsibility issue, and until I hear otherwise, I will assume that she has been a responsible parent and will not assume to judge her based on 5 days of wild media speculation and partisan sniping.
Posted by: Sue | September 3, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
It is sexism and the MSM should be more objective and respectful instead of sexist and in the tank for Obama
Posted by: T | September 3, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Conservatives need not worry, The Libs will self destruct very soon. They are allready in favor of killing their own children thru abortion. Simply do the math, Conservatives love kids and have larger families, Libs have very few kids if any. It’s just a matter of time!
Posted by: Ynot | September 3, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Liberals are finding themselves critical of Sarah…. a woman’s choice to raise children and earn a living, calling it bad parenting. Maybe it is because the Dem’s have no one like Sarah. Has anybody ever asked Barack Obama can he bring up his two kids and be president of the United States? If Sarah was a dem none of this would be an issue. Stop the sexism I am just trying to understand. You can not have it both ways. Stop the sexism?
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Wow!!! Some people will say anything to prove a point. I don’t claim any political party. But lets forget about the pregnant child issue and just talk about the investigation that Gov. Palin is under. Either the McCain camp is dumb for picking her or extremely smart. We all understand why it would be a dumb move. But why would it be smart? Will, we as a country have already spent 3-4 days talking about her and her issues. We have spent absolutely no time talking about the issues that are facing this country. I really think that’s what he (*McCain)was after. The economy is the major problem in this country and we are totally off that subject. If that’s what he wanted to do then he is brilliant!!!
Posted by: Worm | September 3, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
The Palin children are absolutely off limits! But Gov. and Mr. Palin are not.
I think many people are missing the true issue regarding Gov.and Mr.Palin and their family. If they want to have 5 kids and both work full time, that is their choice. Under normal circumstances, it may work out just fine. But these are not normal circumstances. With the recent birth of their special needs son, an impending teen marriage and birth of a grand-child, their family is facing a challenging time. When offered the position of VP, did the Palins sit at the kitchen table and ask themselves,
“What is best for our family, above all else?” It is hard for me to respect the judgement of any parents who, under these conditions,choose to have one parent take on a high powered, time consuming job that will take him or her far from home. And before you scream, Sexism!, this applies to men as well as women. Just recently, my sister-in-law finally put her foot down on my brother who had, for the sole purpose of ego and career advancement,taken a job in Australia with the intention of commuting every few months. They are the parents of 3.
Perhaps if the Palin’s had thought:
Family First,Country Second
The McCain/Palin camp would like to present the Palins as a typical American family. I would venture that most American families faced with this situation would re-group, re-focus their priorities and accept the reality that their new family situation will present a set of new emotional challenges and time constraints.
Posted by: Kate | September 3, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Sarah Palin is NOT the first woman to be nominated as a VP. The Democrats were the first party to treat women as equals!!!
“Democrat Geraldine Ferraro, in 1984 was the first female vice presidential candidate on a major party ticket”
Posted by: E.S. | September 3, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Face it, we wouldn’t be having any of this discussion if Palin were a man –
(S)he wouldn’t be on the ticket due to lack of any significant qualifications.
And before anyone says “She’s more qualified than Obama — he’s never had an executive position,” what executive position has McCain ever held?
And if being mayor of a small town and governor of a geographically large but relatively unpopulous state makes her more qualified than Obama/Biden, I submit that she’s more qualified than McCain as well. So why isn’t SHE at the top of the ticket?
God help us all…
Posted by: Paul C | September 3, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
E.S. We know about Geraldine. Who are you yelling at?
Posted by: Sue | September 3, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
McCain/Palin ticket is fabulous it’s like the grand Oprah. Palin power house
with the high notes it’s not about gender it’s about the brainonomics
Posted by: Gloria | September 3, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
WE alwys knew it would be a Republican woman to be the first V>P> and the President!! Go McCain /Palin
Posted by: Ynot | September 3, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Obama has gone on record to say that family members are off limits for political gain and he has stuck by this. It is obivious that lately, even republicans catch themselves wondering if Palin is up to the job. The dough is really streched thin here. I expect a ferocious speech from Palin today but it will not change her credentials. Based on her declared social policy stand (BTW, any one can have solcial policy stand, you do not need executive experience)she can become VP of GA, AL, MS, AK, TN, NC and maybe OH but not of the USA. All the feigned indination about ‘sexist attacks’ are a blatant play for Hillary Clinton’s supporters. They are not stupid. Sarah Palin is no substitute for Hillary Clinton. She does not even come close. I am afraid Obama is going to win the popular vote because McCain failed to use good judgement. Mind you, the Presidency is only one of three power houses. Get ready for a hard battle for congress.
Posted by: Martian | September 3, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
She became Governor of Alaska by defeating the Incumbent Republican Governor and doing it *without* the money or the support of the Republican Party, which was amazing in itself – and she won by a landslide. The “powers that be” at that time totally underestimated Sarah and learned better the hard way. Let’s hope Obama does the same. Sarah has done exactly what she claimed she was going to do when elected and is just as popular today as the day she was elected – perhaps more so since even the Democrats up here seem to like her – she works well with both sides in the Legislature here.
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
The real question is: why did McCain put the story of the pregnancy out in the first place?
He seems to be emphasizing the fact that she is not getting an abortion, an obvious play to conservatives. This is what I would call using a minor for political gain. And Palin? As much as I respect her in energy issues, she just doesn’t bring much else to the table. She’s just a political figurehead to be dumped as soon as the election ends. She’s being used.
Posted by: JC | September 3, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
John McCain should explain why Carly Fiorina is on his campaign – because you know – she was fired from her job at HP because of her bad record – and now she’s on his campaign? How does hiring someone who was fired for doing badly – make sense? But, I shouldn’t be surprised – since Palin is also a bad pick. John McCain has lost his judgment – he keeps choosing people who are terrible at what they do!
Posted by: Ally | September 3, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Sarah has EXECTUTIVE experience *running a government* (something NONE of the other candidates can actually boast, even John McCain as Governor of Alaska and got there by defeating the *incumbent* Republican Governor, who was definitely part of the “old school” and who WAS very much in the pocket of the big oil companies. We in Alaska wanted change – and we got it in the person of Sarah Palin!
Sarah Palin is everything she looks to be and more. Her approval rating as Governor of Alaska has been as high as 95% and is currently leveled out consistently in the upper 80 percentile throughout the state (and in both parties) – the HIGHEST approval rating of ANY sitting Governor.
Posted by: GoUSA247 | September 3, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Sarah Palin — Dan Quayle in a skirt.
Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
WOW, what a pick! Ms. Palin seems to be just what the doctor ordered. A plain, ordinary, smart, and driven woman with problems that everyday American families deal with. I have dubbed her “Sarah, Plain and Tall”. A children’s book about a woman who travels from Maine to the Midwest to make a difference in the life of a family going through a heart breaking hardship. This to me is an analogy that can be made that enables Sarah Palin to travel from Alaska to D.C. and allows her to make a difference in the lives of American Citizens.
R Durham in North Carolina
Posted by: Ray Elizabeth Durham | September 3, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Regardless of what has been said about Palin, the PROCESS, or lack of, McCain used in choosing her raises serious ddoubts about his judgment. As a “maverick” he yielded to the most radical, and single issue conservatives when he dropped Lieberman and chose Palin. He lost my vote.
Posted by: Paul | September 3, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
Pretty quiet out there, folks. Could it be that Sarah has you running scared?
Posted by: Sue | September 4, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
I also like Sarah Palin and agree that
family issues,make her just like the rest of us!
Human
Best Wishes to the
McCain/Palin Ticket!
Posted by: catburne | September 4, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Authentic debate about platform, policy, experience, leadership and values is dead. Sound-bite sniping has replaced point and rebuttal. The same strategies are being used to sell the candidates that are employed to sell sports cars to men who fear losing their masculinity by driving a mini-van. Establishing a climate of fear and inciting those who already tend toward self-righteousness, has become the prevailing strategy to procure votes. Religious claims are presented to court those who believe they will step into heaven on the backs of pagans who disagree with their “spiritual values.” We have always defined ourselves by “not being our enemy.” With the loss of superpower Russia and its perceived communist threat, we have turned on each other. It doesn’t matter who we elect, it just can’t be “one of them.” Win at all cost and the people be damned. It’s not about Sarah Palin or Barack Obama. Its about power at any price and through any means.
Posted by: Paul | September 6, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Someone out there actually had the gall to post in a list that they’d like to see Obama’s certificate of baptism! I’m so disgusted to think there are voters out there who think within those lines. We get the government we deserve, and from the way we allow ourselves to be led to focus on issues of no importance, I say we’re not worthy of good leaders. It is certainly no wonder how these people come to power. All they have to do is figure out how to best manipulate the sheep we’ve all become
Posted by: StateB | September 6, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm