By Lee Speigel

Sep 2, 2008 8:13pm

McCain Media Attacks Become Entrenched Part of Strategy

This McCain vs. the Media meme has been percolating for a few months.

I can’t say that I don’t understand the frustrations of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and his campaign team.

Empirically, according to studies and ombudsmen, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., is on TV and on newspaper front pages more often.

And in my personal view — speaking for myself only — I can certainly see why McCainiacs would be frustrated with the media as a whole.

(To be fair, there are other studies, such as this one, saying that Obama gets more negative coverage. On the other hand, one of those studies cited as evidence of negativity me saying, quite factually, that, according to polls, "far more Americans say John McCain would be a good commander in chief than Obama." That’s not negative, that’s a fact, and it’s Obama’s biggest vulnerability. But I digress.)

That said, amidst the McCain campaign’s feelings that the New York Times and MSNBC and others will never give them a fair shake, they could be seen as losing perspective.

Some of this is, of course, a pose. "Annoy the Media. Vote Bush," read the bumper sticker that President George H.W. Bush brandished during the 1992 GOP convention. (The Boston Globe recalls this today in a blog post: "Annoy the media, defend Palin.")

Hence, we will see former Sen. Fred Thompson, R-Tenn., tonight, according to the Weekly Standard, say, "What a breath of fresh air Gov. Sarah Palin is. She is from a small town, with small town values, but that’s not good enough for those folks who are attacking her and her family. Let’s be clear, the selection of Gov. Palin has the other side and their friends in the media in a state of panic. She is a courageous, successful reformer, who is not afraid to take on the establishment."

That’s all fine and well. Red meat for the base.

But McCain’s campaign has spent much of the day complaining that CNN’s Campbell Brown went "over the line" in her interview with McCain spox Tucker Bounds last night.

Check it out for yourself:

See anything unfair in there?

The McCain campaign says the questions were so beyond the pale, they canceled McCain’s appearance on "Larry King Live" tonight.

McCain-Palin spox Maria Comella says, “As a presidential campaign, we reserve the right to adjust Sen. McCain’s media schedule in order to ensure the most effective use of his time.  After a relentless refusal by certain on-air reporters to come to terms with John McCain’s selection of Alaska’s sitting governor as our party’s nominee for vice president, we decided John McCain’s time would be better served elsewhere."

Then there’s this "prickly" TIME interview with a reporter McCain was once fond of, Jay Carney. You can hear Carney’s confusion.

TIME: There’s a theme that recurs in your books and your speeches, both about putting country first, but also about honor. I wonder if you could define honor for us?

McCain: Read it in my books.

TIME: I’ve read your books.

McCain: No, I’m not going to define it.

TIME: But honor in politics?

McCain: I defined it in five books. Read my books.

TIME: [Your] campaign today is more disciplined, more traditional, more aggressive. From your point of view, why the change?

McCain: I will do as much as we possibly can do to provide as much access to the press as possible.

TIME: But beyond the press, sir, just in terms of …

McCain: I think we’re running a fine campaign, and this is where we are.

TIME: Do you miss the old way of doing it?

McCain: I don’t know what you’re talking about.

TIME: Really? Come on, Senator.

McCain: I’ll provide as much access as possible …

TIME: In 2000, after the primaries, you went back to South Carolina to talk about what you felt was a mistake you had made on the Confederate flag. Is there anything so far about this campaign that you wish you could take back or you might revisit when it’s over?

McCain: [Does not answer.]

TIME: Do I know you? [Says with a laugh.]

McCain: [Long pause.] I’m very happy with the way our campaign has been conducted, and I am very pleased and humbled to have the nomination of the Republican Party.

Yikes.

At some point, the media is going to want to ask Gov. Palin questions.

And some of those questions are going to be tough — as mayor of Wasilla, did she, in fact, seek to ban books at a local library, for instance, as one rival claims?

And I don’t know how much the American people will think those questions unfair, or how well complaining about those questions will play.

- jpt

User Comments

Is it just me, or does Camp McSame seem to be in full-on freefall at this point? They can’t defend this indefensible pick, they can’t admit that this was a pick out of political desperation with next to no vetting, and they can’t stanch the flow of revelations about her character and ethics as a public servant.
“McSame: Campaign First.”

Posted by: Patricia in SF | September 2, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

That’s not negative; that’s a fact. And it’s Obama’s biggest vulnerability.
Two out of three: It is negative. It is a fact. It is his biggest vulnerability. But the question you raise is about the positive/negative nature of media coverage, not its fairness. That is a different issue. I don’t think one camp would be complaining if the other was getting a lot of regularly negative attention, be it true/relevant or not.

Posted by: bab23 | September 2, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Lets see weasely McCain spox gets nailed to the wall by a journalist doing her job.
The McCain campaign runs away.
BTW what happened to McCain doing frequent press conferences?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Phil Gramm was right about the whiners…except that it’s only half the American people…the Republican half.

Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

So the McCain campaign releases info on the VP’s daughter because of internet rumors about the VP.
In response, right winger calls for the investigation of 6 and 8 year olds.
Yes watch out America, “Hi Daddy” is actual terrorist code!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

So let me get this straight.
In a close election in which Obama is likely to have a financial advantage, the McCain campaign has decided to screw off free media?
Do they realize FoxNews is already their voting base?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Obama admits that he is completely inexperienced. When asked what qualifies to make him (Obama) more experienced than Palin he made an argument that he is experienced enough to be president because of the presidential campaign he has run.
He compared his employee and budget size to Palin’s while she was Mayor. Direct quote from Obama: “Well, my understanding is that Governor Palin’s town of Wasilla has, I think, 50 employees. We’ve got 2,500 in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. You know, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month. So I think that our ability to manage large systems and to execute I think has been made clear over the last couple of years,” Obama said.
Well that statement is completely a blow off of Sarah’s experience for 2 years as governor in which she manages a budget of over 10 billion dollars and employee base of 24,000 people.
This shows how Obama is unwilling to recognize the achievements of others he may not agree with. Yet this is a quality that is needed by any President.
Plus before you compare Obama’s 4 years as Senator for 4 yrs vs Palin’s experience as governor for 2 years. Let me remind you that Obama only attended his day job for 2 yrs. 2 yrs as governor vs 2 yrs as senator.
Not so long ago, Senators running for President were considered a joke because they had no executive or management experience. Instead governors were first choice, mayors were second, and senators were barely a blip on the screen. Why? Governors gain more executive experience in one year than a Senator makes in 30 years.

Posted by: Funny | September 2, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

When you don’t know someone…don’t be a spokesman.
Palin/McCain change that will secede

Posted by: doug | September 2, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

ryan c…
ok, just a quick, obvious, question for you and all other obvious obama supporters: what makes you think obamas experience is any better to qualify him for theposition of PRESIDENT let alone vice president? you are honestly going to talk about the issue of experience?! what possible ground do you have to stand on with this issue?

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

“Plus before you compare Obama’s 4 years as Senator for 4 yrs vs Palin’s experience as governor for 2 years. Let me remind you that Obama only attended his day job for 2 yrs. 2 yrs as governor vs 2 yrs as senator.”
Obama missed only 11 votes the 1st session of Congress. He missed 45% of the votes for the current session. McCain has missed 63% of the current session
I would be fine with calling it 3 years though.
BTW Palin has been in office since Dec 2006 so she is a little shy of 2 years.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

The McCain campaign has become the whiniest campaign there ever was.

Posted by: Nancy | September 2, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Thus we see the McCain campaign in full self-destruction mode. BTW does anyone find it odd that Fred Thompson (he who wore Gucci loafers to Iowa county fair) has suddenly become an expert on small town values. I mean do we really need a VP whose only appeal is that she was a mayor of a small town?

Posted by: Tarheel74 | September 2, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

All the news media is focussing the case against Palin and is diverting the attention to what Obama said about his Executive experience. What a shame? Even, Obama cannot vouch for his experience and tell people the story of his experience is in managing his campaign. Obama did not get it. Campaign and Presidency are two different things. Even Movie moghuls do campaigning for their Blockbluster Movie. Also,Obama is trying to prove that he is VP candidate when he compared his experience with Palin.

Posted by: Tim | September 2, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Excuse me but it were the Republicans who wanted the narrative out there that Sarah was a mother who *choose* to keep a baby with DS.
To me, that’s using that baby for sympathy votes.
Don’t know what it has to do with Foreign Experience or National Security but they thought it was important to know.
And now they’re complaining that we’re paying attention to the fact that her daughter was not properly educated on how to protect yourself?
That’s hypocrisy.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 2, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Ryan, you’re a little more sensible than most people on these blog sites, but I’m going to insist on 2 yrs because I can not equal 143 days being in the Senate as 3 years. I’ll only willing to give 2 yrs.

Posted by: Funny | September 2, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Sarah Palin is not at fault here. And this is not a matter of experience. It’s about JUDGEMENT. Obama’s JUDGMENT beat hillary clinton (the supposed shoe-in). John Mccain picked the governor of ALASKA to potentially assume the role of president if something happened to him. Think about that…

Posted by: kayv | September 2, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

The questions should be directed at obama for having ties to terrorists, doing cocaine, not just drinking too much when 22, belonging to a hate filled church that supports Lybia and Ghadafi, and being financially supported including the purchase of his home by an indicted felon. Aren’t these questions much more germaine that whether or not the VPOTUS candidates daughter make a mistake. Come on this is beyond ridiculous. Investigate real stories.

Posted by: s.b. | September 2, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

I’m disturbed over McCains’ temperament.
He seems to get agitated very quickly.
I find this troubling for a commander-in-chief. When are we going to start hearing the stories about this more? He was a senator for 26 years and everybody has had a run in with him. Romney even has a memo about it. I think the American people have a right to know more.

Posted by: Pogyak | September 2, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Fred Thompson: “She is a courageous, successful reformer, who is not afraid to take on the establishment.”
Fred Thompson does not read the intertubes.
She didn’t take on the establishment. And certainly not the corrupt Alaskan Republican Party. That Republican Party is still invested with crooks. It were the Feds are in the process of purging it of the crooks. Sarah Palin has done nothing to bring that about.
In fact, she even led a commission in support of the biggest crook of all: Sen. Ted Stevens.
She hired a lobbyist with ties to both Stevens AND Abramoff.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 2, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

“but I’m going to insist on 2 yrs because I can not equal 143 days being in the Senate as 3 years.”
I’m game for that.
But only if you figure out the amount of days McCain spent in the Senate floor.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Concerned in OH.
FoxNews and Hannity have covered that stuff for months.
Oh wait….you wanted a legitimate new organization to cover those stories vs a partisan propaganda organ

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Hey Tim…if McCain’s campaign can say that Palin has foreign policy experience because Alaska is next to Russia and she has commander in chief experience over the Alaska National Guard, then Obama can surely say that besides his state senator and US senator experience he’s run a successful mutimillion dollar corporation for the last 19 months. successful.

Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Willem: Keep dreaming

Posted by: Funny | September 2, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

“Don’t know what it has to do with Foreign Experience or National Security but they thought it was important to know”
That was covered in her “CIC” role with the Alaskan national guard…until it blew up in their faces 5 seconds later.
Campbell:”C’mon Tucker just one instance”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Brown asked aggressive questions, and Bounds answered them well. Now, can we get one of Obama’s people on Brown’s show answering the same questions?

Posted by: David H | September 2, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

The Obama campaign’s press lackies need to stop asking about Palin’s experience. Everytime they do this McCain’s people get to point out Obama’s lack of experience. Remember, people vote for the top of the ticket.

Posted by: David H | September 2, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

I think her foreign policy experience comes from running the National Guard in AK and going to Kuwait and visiting wounded soldiers in Germany before it was demanded of her.
Back to Obama: one of the primary concerns of the presidency are the troops. He snubbed, repeat… snubbed wounded soldiers. Soldiers who are mostly low to middle income people and with a minority background. Yet Obama would rather go to the gym and shoot baskets than stop in and say hello to wounded soldiers and future veterans.

Posted by: Funny | September 2, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

“Obama recently held a fundraiser at Abramoffs law firm. I don’t recall anyone getting in a tizzy about that…”
Perhaps because your memory is faulty.
That was last year.
And the reason it wasn’t a big story in either the primary or general election:
Both McCain and Hillary took even MORE money in from that firm.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

“I think her foreign policy experience comes from running the National Guard in AK and going to Kuwait and visiting wounded soldiers in Germany before it was demanded of her.”
Funny,
C’mon now. The actual commander of the Alaskan Guard, who has complimented Palin, but made it very clear that she has no part in our national defense and has no command in the field.
At that point you would have to credit Obama’s trip last month as foreign policy experience.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

I’m voting for McCain not Palin. I’m comparing how people are questioning Palin’s experience when I believe Obama’s is even thinner. Plus there is experience within Palin considering she is the only one with executive experience and the white house is the executive branch of the government.
I’m not going to say anything about Obama’s education because I’m a strong supporter of education.

Posted by: Female | September 2, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

mary…
im not saying obama CANT say he has run a successful multimillion dollar campaign. he (and his advisors) have accomplished that. thats not the problem. my problem with what h said was that he compared his successful multimillion dollar campaign to palin bein the mayor of wisilla alaska! why didnt he compare his multimillion dollar campaign against her over 1 BILLION dollar a year budget?! thats all im saying. he was being misleading, and its not te end of the world. he is a politician, they all do it. that isnt the reason im not voting for him.. lol im just simply pointing out that he compared himself running (again with his advisors) his campaign (which essentially IS a business) to her being the mayor of a small own. did he simply just forget that she has been the head of and successfully ran a u.s state with an average budget of over a billion dollars and tens of thousands of employees?! all i wanted to say that he blantantly was trying to misguide people on the facts.

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Funny
Obama has visited a lot more American troops than Palin ever has, if that matters for who should be President.
And the Governor is only the leader of the National Guard WITHIN the state, NEVER of foreign soil.

Posted by: jock59801 | September 2, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

“lets face it, community leader? constitutional law professor?! not that these are bad things, but there are ALOT of those people out there”
Tim,
While there are many community organizers (what Obama was doing was voter registration drives) and quite a few Constitutional Law professors.
There are not many that do both.
But I respect your tone and your view of the ticket.
We will just have to vote our consciences and agree to disagree.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 2, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

wow, typical in the tank for obama media being totally biased with no objectivity. Mccain Palin 08 is a much safer and better choice for the USA

Posted by: c | September 2, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

The media’s harsh treatment of Palin is so appalling — has any of this happened to Obama?
She is a strong woman with her own opinions. She worked hard for her hometown and her state. She brought in federal money to build roads and update sewer lines for her hometown — what is wrong with that? She opposes to wasteful spending, she is not about no spending.
I am so disgusted by these journalists who report with intention to trash a person — where is your professional ethics? She is a mother of 5 and a governor with 80% public approval rate.
All this only convince me that I need to give my vote to her, even though I disagree with her views.

Posted by: amy | September 2, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

I got the number from a few delegates that were on CNN and Fox

Posted by: Funny | September 2, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

When Obama was working voter registration did he work with ACORN?

Posted by: cardinal | September 2, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Jake:
Why is there no media reports on McCain’s reknow temper? Especially with all his irrationality lately. The 2000 Bush campagign made this a subtle issue…haven’t recent events warrented more investigation?

Posted by: DMR | September 2, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

amy…
you had me until you said you have to vote with her even though you dont agree with her..lol thats just ridiculous

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

ill take a “chance” on mccains temper.. lol seriously? is that what we are concerned with here?!

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

I am a lifetime Republican. Tucker Bounds is an idiot. He alone is the rason I will not vote for McCain.

Posted by: BabyMeBaby | September 2, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

So many lies in these comments. Any waterhead with even a minimal knowledge of government KNOWS that a Senator is more deeply involved in the nation’s affairs that a small state governor (who just got a passport to visit Kuwait)
And my word, can the whining and complaining ever cease EVERY time the press tosses something a little tougher than the usual softfball questions to these “Mavericks”? The “biased press” riff is getting pretty stale—after about 20 years. Toughen up Republicans. You have been dishing out the lies and sludge for so long, you can’t even seem to handle a LEGITIMATE tough question coming your way. Pathetic. Now, back to your lies about Obama. Riff on and on. Here’s a hankie. No cakewalk for you for the next 60 days. It’s going to get tougher, so grow some spine… and read your history books for a change.

Posted by: tdub | September 2, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

I am a lifetime Republican. Tucker Bounds is an idiot. He alone is the rason I will not vote for McCain.

Posted by: BabyMeBaby | September 2, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Jake, a brief correction. When you refer to the study that showed Obama received more ‘negative’ coverage, they weren’t suggesting that ‘negative’ means false or wrong. They’re talking about criticism as opposed to praise — and by their standard, accurately describe your quote as negative.
I digress, of course. But just wanted to keep things accurate.

Posted by: Harley | September 2, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

I’m not sure where people are getting the idea that Palin is a reformer. Apparently she got huge earmarks for Wasilla by hiring a lobbyist (who happened to be Ted Stevens former chief of staff). She left the town with a huge deficit ($20 million) even though she inherited none. She worked for Ted Stevens 527. She is under investigation for abuse of power and from her history it sounds like she’s guilty. All I see is corrupt, arrogant, and unethical behavior.

Posted by: Joan | September 2, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

amy..where have you been for the last 19 months?

Posted by: Joan | September 2, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Maybe it’s just me . . . when I see video of McCain clapping his hands I’m reminded of a toy monkey banging cymbals.
Also, the radical Christians would have gone rabid if one of Al & Tipper’s kids went prego. If it had happened to Chelsea, we would have gotten another Ken Starr.

Posted by: Slipperr in DC | September 2, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

I usually do not buy the media bias thing except for the non stop attacks on Sarah Palin. The media is sexist, bias, and not as “tolerant” as they claim to be. Millions of single mom s will relate to Palin.

Posted by: nwkerr2005 | September 2, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Why is the MSM asking more questions about Bristol than Ayers? 19 months Obama has been running and zero questions.

Posted by: cardinal | September 2, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

To Concerned in ohio…
“i am ok with bringing in someone who may be lacking the “necesary” experience but just not at the top of the presidential ticket”
So you don’t won’t to vote for someone as president with the lack of neccessary experience but your ok with allowing someone with out “neccessary” experience run the country still by default??? RUNNING THE COUNTRY IS STILL RUNNING THE SOUNTRY!!! Whether you voted for that person or whether they became president because the current president was unable to lead. Isn’t that the same thing? You make no sence, just arguing for the sake of arguing!

Posted by: Obama supporter | September 2, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Palin got those federal fundings to improve her own hometown. She opposes to wasteful spending, she is not about “no spending”. To reduce government spending, she even cut her own salary.
If she was corrupt as the news media wanted to make you believe, how can they explain Palin won her mayor position twice with landslide, won governor position by more than 30% against a 3-term republican senator, and won 51% in a 3-way contest against a former governor (a democratic). Palin’s approval rate is 80%, tell me if there is any other governor can get this high mark?

Posted by: amy | September 2, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Full Disclosure:
Campbell Brown is married to the neocon Dan Senor- spokesperson for George Bush and John Mccains illegal invasion of Iraq.

Posted by: TheIncumbent | September 2, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Below I have a question for MEDIA MEMBERS TO CONSIDER WITH THE CURRENT OFFICERS OF THE AIP.
Palin was the PARTY SECRETARY, an officer of the Alaska Independence party. She was not a mere member.
Palin was an officer of a secessionist party, whose intent is to secede from the union, since option 3 already exists, options 1 and 2 are what makes the party’s energy and momentum happen.
PALIN put her energy as officer of the party into an option to secede from the UNION.
THEREFORE, ONE NATION INDIVISIBLE IS NOT HER POINT OF VIEW.
MEDIA MEMBERS:
Ask the current officers of the Alaska Independence Party to explain the options that the AIP intends.
1. Alaska to be an independent nation-state, which means Alaska secedes from the union.
2. Alaska to be a commonwealth, like Puerto Rico, paying no income tax, which means Alaska secedes from the union.
3. Stays a state.
4. Other

Posted by: Bruce Becker | September 2, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

John McCain is a maverick.
He has shown time and time again that he is willing to charge into situations and make rash decisions that effect real people. From his rush into Iraq with incomplete intelligence to his call for aggression against Russia in the Georgia conflict before it was learned that Gerogia fired first, he is willing to buck the party trend of careful analysis and instead let his emotions drive him.

Posted by: johnTX | September 2, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Tim-I would be happy to answer that for you. Lets look at Palin versus Obama in terms of experience…1980 to 1984; Obama attends Columbia U, Palin is Miss Wasilla and runner up for miss Alaska (Obama gets world class education, Palin gets tiara)
1985 to 1990, Oabam works on the southside of Chicago as a community organizer, then attends Harvard where he majors in law AND is elected president of the Harvard law review. Palin, during the same time, majors in Journalism at the University of Idaho and minors in political science. (Obama President of Harvard Law review, Palin learning to be a journalist)From 1991 to 1995 Obama graduates magna cum laude from Harvard and takes a job at a law firm in Chicago, directing the Illinois Project Vote and staying invloved with community organizations. Palin is involved in the PTA and the Alaskan Independence Party, which FYI, seeked to secede from the Union. How very patriotic of her.
1996 to 200 Mr Obama teached Constitutional law at the Univ. Of Chicago Law School and is elected to the Illinois Senate where he sponsors over 800 bills during that time. Palin is the the mayor of Wasilla (pop. 5,470 at the time).
2001 to 2004 Obama is reelected to his seat and Chairs the Health and Huaman Services Committee. Speaks out about the Iraq war before we ever send troops there. In 2004 he is elected to the US Senate. Palin is elected President of the Alaska Conference of Mayors. Whatever that is.
In 2005 Obama is sworn in as the 5th African American Senate member, is part of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, European Affairs Subcommittee, Cosponsored Orderly Immigration bill along with ethics reform amongst many others, and overall has a good realtionship and know-how in the ways of Congress and the national stage. Plain is sworn in as mayor in December 2006, so techinically she has been a mayor for just about 19 months, was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it, shut down the project but kept all the earmarked funds, and lives close to Russia. Sort of.

Posted by: Stephanie | September 2, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Sorry for the typos, my eyes are tired

Posted by: Steph | September 2, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

So I was merely making the point in terms of BOTH experience and qualifications, Obama has her whooped and the argument really needs to be put to bed.

Posted by: Steph | September 2, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Comparing Obama and Palin, one thing that really matters is “how many people benefit from their leadership”?
Obama’s south chicago — the worst place in Chicago, crime-ridden, people die on daily basis. Has Obama done anything to improve it? Yes, with 11 of Rezko’s defunct public housing projects.
Palin’s hometown and Alaska — read newspaper you will find out.

Posted by: amy | September 2, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

I see people posting that Palin is a strong woman with strong opinions.
I see the opposite. HER FAITH BASED PANDERING IS TOTALLY ABOUT THE TEACHINGS OF HER CHURCH.
That is not strength.
Her position is no different from the Tennessee Taliban who railroaded Snopes in 1927, making creationism local law.
Creationism, claiming the planet is only 5000 years old, is an excuse to ignore global warming.
She does not have strong opinions. She doesnt have her own opinions. She is a parrot.
All her points of view were first stated in the mid-1200′s by the Catholic church.
Denial of science, denial of women’s rights, nothing “strong” about any of it. It is the work of parrots. The OFFICIAL MANTRA. AUTHORITY TOLD ME.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | September 2, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

MCCAINS PAST HAS A WAY OF ATTACKING HIM SELF–LETS SEE—–FIRST WIFE AND CHILDREN UNDER THE BUS—-SECOND WIFE CINDY CALLS HER THE C WORD—-HILLARY HE CALLS THE B WORD—–NOW HE HAS FOUND HIS SOUL MATE—WOULDNT YOU THINK THAT MCCAIN HAS NO RESPECT FOR WOMEN AND SIMPLY USES THEM–HA HA HA HA HA HE SHOWS WOMEN THAT THEY ARE STUPID–AND THEY LOVE IT

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

All this only convince me that I need to give my vote to her, even though I disagree with her views.
what?? how much sense does that make…
i dont agree with her views but you dont talk nice about her so im voting for her?
listen media makes a big deal about everything some people think it should get alot of media attention others think its just picking on someone..
rev wright is a perfect ex. obama got slapped for everything that man did or said just like palin is getting slapped for everything mccain or her daughter has done.

Posted by: melissa | September 2, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Sarah Palin and Anna Nicole Smith, hmmmm…

Posted by: quiot | September 2, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Senator Obama why would you subject your daughters to the racist and hate filled sermons of Jeremiah Wright?
Haven’t heard this question asked either right?

Posted by: geevill | September 2, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Republicans chant USA– Dems chant Obama.

Posted by: cardinal | September 2, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

All this only convince me that I need to give my vote to her, even though I disagree with her views.
Posted by: amy | Sep 2, 2008 9:07:12 PM
This person has two months to realize that the poor picked-on woman will end the civil rights she enjoys.
A person of 44 will end up serving for 8 12 or 16 years. Consider the issues. Dont vote out of some adolescent reactivity. Take a breath and allow the details to come out.
What is creationism? Why is it destructive to global warming?
What is the Alaska Independence Party and why do they want to leave the UNITED STATES and become a new nation of Alaska? Would that be good for the US economy? Would that be good for the US defense from Russia?
Why did she put her time and energy into a secessionist party?
There are plenty of real issues. Relax. Let the facts come out. People call Obama a Muslim and commie, although he is not. Palin had not felt a 10th the scorn and insanity that the person of color has endured. Dont give your vote away so fast.

Posted by: Bruce Becker | September 2, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

…and what if say it was Obama’s seventeen year old daughter who was pregnant out of wed lock. Oh the Republicans would be falling all over themselves lecturing every Black person in America from the convention mount. But hey…Palin is a real American, it makes her more human, humble. Ooohhh how Apple Pie.
Can I get a Hip Hip, Hypocrisy anyone?

Posted by: quiot | September 2, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

It was political malpractice for Tucker Bounds to do an interview, knowing what he’d be asked about, and have no legit prepared response. Did he assume the media would go easy on him? Campbell could have a been a lot tougher, and others will be. Of course this isn’t the first time–he stands out as being particularly ridiculous, even among the talking heads.

Posted by: CJ | September 2, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Palin has successfully fought corruption in Alaska.
What corruption did Obama expose in Chicago? None. As Rudy said, he must not be very observant.
There’s a reason why we haven’t had a senator elected to the White House since JFK.

Posted by: Peach | September 2, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

The wheels have fallen off the GOP’s bus.
You know, and everyone else knows that Sarah Palin was not a first choice.
You know, and everyone else knows, that they never even heard the name “Sarah Palin” before.
And you know, and everyone else knows that Barack Obama knocked it out of the park on Thursday night.
McCain is desperate.
It’s over.

Posted by: Robin Landseadel | September 2, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Republicans chant USA– Dems chant Obama.
“Is that all you’ve got”
-Obama to McCain

Posted by: quiot | September 2, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Len – what a fantastic post. Kudos to you for pointing out what the haters can’t seem to figure out.
I do believe it’s because most of them are part of the kook fringe.

Posted by: Peach | September 2, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Palin has successfully fought corruption in Alaska.
What corruption did Obama expose in Chicago? None. As Rudy said, he must not be very observant.
There’s a reason why we haven’t had a senator elected to the White House since JFK.
Giulliani whose own Police Commish Kerik was busted for Mob ties, that Rudy?

Posted by: quiot | September 2, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Why does Sarah Palin hate America?

Posted by: quiot | September 2, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Palin has successfully fought corruption in Alaska.
What corruption did Obama expose in Chicago? None. As Rudy said, he must not be very observant.
There’s a reason why we haven’t had a senator elected to the White House since JFK.
…then again, he was having an affair, cheating on his wife and kids (who will not speak to him)
Only to tell said wife that he was leaving her during a press conference on TV. That Rudy?

Posted by: quiot | September 2, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

geevill
The qualifications for President and Vice President are exactly the same.

Posted by: jock59801 | September 2, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Why do people focus on Ayers when Obama and Ayers were on the same board. Palin is under investigation for her abuse of power but everyone dismisses that. She alleged was a member of the Alaskan Independence Party.
Everyone shouldn’t be focused on Palin’s daughter. Everyone should be focused on educating these young women on not premarital sex and if they make that decision, they need to have some type of birth control. Palin and McCain both are against birth control and educating young women on birth control. If Palin’s daughter would have been using birth control then she wouldn’t be having a baby at 17. When you have a child your whole life changes and you have to grow up real fast. My prayers are with Palin’s daughter to be strong because her child will be depending on her.

Posted by: d w | September 2, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

“See anything unfair in there?”
Tell me what is fair in advocacy journalism. I see a woman working hard to elect Barack Obama and that is consistent with what she said about Hillary Clinton or any other candidate that threatens him.
Palin doesn’t have to explain her decisions for her family members. She has to explain what she will do to change Washington politics.
Campbell Brown will have to explain how she justifies her position as a news anchor who advocates for a candidate in a national election.
This in-the-tank business is ruining the credibility of broadcast journalism.

Posted by: len | September 2, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Cindy McCain has more experience than Sarah Palin.

Posted by: johnTX | September 2, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Were you there, Rodney? Did you spend your time being tortured? Did you serve?
“len thinks like a wacko”
Call me what you like. I don’t feel the pain and you don’t have the reach, but John McCain served honorably and paid the price. If you denigrate that, you don’t deserve the right to post here or anywhere. You forfeit your honor, and take this to your campus dorm room, those without honor have no place in the service of a country, and are not heard among those who do.
They merely breathe the free air such have ensured they can.

Posted by: len | September 2, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Sarah Palin hasn’t demonstrated an ability to name all 50 states, let alone govern them.

Posted by: johnTX | September 2, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

len you know absolutely nothing about mccains early history—–before you make fantsy statements you should do your homework—–if you knew all the facts you certainly would see things diferently—then again maybe not

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

why would someone vote for a person that doesn’t agree on their issues? there are people in other countries who have elected officials that don’t agree with their issues but they don’t have a choice on electing the officials. We do have a choice so why would a person vote for someone that doesn’t agree on their issues?

Posted by: d w | September 2, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

McCain will likely win the election because the media treat him with a kid glove while undercutting Obama at every turn. Obama meets each challenge head on and often using it to break new ground. McCain has responded to the kid-glove treatment in an erratic, confused, evasive, unreadable way. Most of us have no idea what McCain really stands for. He does not appear to be the one controlling his campaign. But the media protects its own. And thanks to their selfishness and cowardice the huge promise of 2008, that has so many of us ready to work for a more productive country, may well turn out to be the U.S. version of Medvedev/Putin — McCain with Cheney/Rove et al pulling the strings.
God save America.

Posted by: cmnsns | September 2, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

go back and read my post—then go to your local LIBRARY and learn something–as to was i there–you may be surprised

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Bald Eagle proves that creationism is not about denying global warming, it is about denying science. These guys dont want to roll back the womens, civil rights and labor movements, they want to roll back the Enlightenment.

Posted by: Mike | September 2, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

its official: blogging absolutely serves no purpose whatsoever.

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Saw the interview twice — PLEASE –just answer the question!!!!! The question was fair, but there was no answer give. WHY?
Here is a pot calling the kettle black. One side is allowed to attack while accusing the other of doing just that. The American citizen is smarter than you are giving credit for. These sophmoric tatics are not going to work this time around!

Posted by: Jo-Ann | September 2, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Campbell Brown has been once of the worst at repeating McCain campaign falsities about Obama. Brown has made big deals out of non-issues about Obama. Finally, Brown was acting like a journalist by pushing Bounds to answer her question.
The lack of media attention was the best thing that happen for McCain. Many people think he is still the McCain from the 2000 primary, but he learned from Bush what was necessary to win, which is everything McCain said he would not do.
Bounds did not want to answer the question because the federal government, not Gov Palin, controls the Alaska National Guard.

Posted by: Julie | September 2, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I cannot belive abc just cut off the fred thompson speech
media bias and manipulation
shameful!

Posted by: smith | September 2, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Brown should have asked that insurance industry lobbyist acting as a spokesman for the McCain campaign why insurance covers Viagra but not birth control.

Posted by: Flash Override | September 2, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

what happens if palin gets impeached as governer—–should be interesting.–mccains soulmate–what a freaking act

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Rev. wright exercised his freedom of speech to say something is wrong with a country he honorobly served as a U.S. MARINE. He tried to bring attention to a problem that is being swept under the rug in america, that american citizens are hated the world over because of the american governments interference in the state affairs of other sovereign nations (see panama). Sarah Palin however has actively sought to get her state to sever its ties with the United States, she is now saying she said no to the “Bridge to Nowhere,” but does not mention that she kept the money anyway. Money from a nation she has advocated strongly that she wants no part of. and this is the person the republican party says is the best qualified to ruin America? to quote her, ” oh, fu** me to tears!”

Posted by: THE curious black | September 2, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

rodney…
ok, simple question for you. why do you think palin was a bad v.p. choice for mccain?

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

tim
to much scandal to start with what will come next second mccain is old would you want her to run our country –with no crediable experience—–someone emailed me some pictures that i cannot believe—this is not the girl next door.—-what do you think people like putin–chavex and a few others would do to her–rookies need to stay out of the big leagues–

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

any others wanna try tha one? what makes palin a bad choice for v.p for mccain??

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Does anyone not see the one sided position of CNN?
I do. The fact that all of Obama’s dirt never gets any attention is pure humor. Obama is not ready to lead.
I’d take 10 Palin’s before I’d take 1 Obama.
Go McCain-Palin

Posted by: kbean | September 2, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Palin has visited three countries in her lifetime.
The United States, Germany and Kuwait. She claimed to have visited Ireland, but apparently it was just a fueling stop.
I’m so glad she’s so well traveled.

Posted by: johnTX | September 2, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

john fro, texas.. dont be afraid to partake in my question below a well… lol

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

I happened to see a little bit of the Republican convention tonight. I thought that I had tuned in to a MEMORIAL DAY celebration.

Posted by: Ron | September 2, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

With only sixty days until the election, isn’t it fair to ask the McCain campaign when Vice Presidential nominee of their party, and someone who’s views we know little about, is going to be allowed to take questions from the media?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 2, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I find most curious in this article the statement of fact that McCain would make a better comander in chief than Obama. I don’t think anything could be farther from “fact”. Maybe that’s a rational opinion, and the most widely accepted one, but I think its entirely wrong headed to concluded that a military man (and there’s no doubting that it runs through every fiber of McCain’s character and genes) makes a good commnader in chief. Military decisions are for generals, not presidents. The leadership of the commander in chief entails policy making decisions that should properly not be trusted to generals, or for that matter, those whose entire way of thinking is the product of life in the military. A commnader in Chief decides whether to make war, not how to do it. I find it odd that so many accept that such a grave power should be entrusted to those who, for quite natural reasons, are predisposed to lead the country to battle rather than those who would do so with a greater trepidation over the costs to the country, not just in lives, but in global respect and stability.

Posted by: sean o | September 2, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

len
Why does Sarah Palin hate America?

Posted by: quiot | September 2, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

sean o…
what would you say if i said marxism runs through every fiber of obamas?

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

is there anyone left in here who wants to talk issues or did everyone leave?

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Tim: “what makes palin a bad choice for v.p for mccain??”
You’ve got to figure that one out yourself, my boy.
When the arguments why she would be a good VP doesn’t catch on with voters and are laughed out of the ballpark, you’ve got a problem. It’s your problem, not ours.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 2, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

willem…
im just asking because you guys seem to be so against her? im just asking, in all honestly, what makes you think shes a bad choice? i feel she was a great choice. possibly better than the republican nominee as a matter of fact… lol

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

tim: “what would you say if i said marxism runs through every fiber of obamas?”
Can I answer this one?
Yawn.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 2, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

TIM TELL US WHY YOU THINK SO

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Tim, great. Than we’re all happy. Right?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 2, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

well im happy, im not sure about all of us.. lol i just like to get the liberal idiots to talk about her “lack of experience” as a talking point, while you guys just nominated the most unqualified, inexperienced canidate for the PRESIDENT in the history of the nation. fact, not an attack… its just fun to listen to them try to rationalize that.. lol

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

TIM
TRY LACK OF EDUCATION AS A STARTER.

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

AND TIM HAS NOT TOLD US ABOUT PALINS QUALIFICATIONS—MUST BE SOMETHING OTHER THAN MCCAINS SOUL MATE NOW THAT IS SILLY.

Posted by: rodney | September 2, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

anybody else left here?! i cant be the only one?!

Posted by: tim | September 2, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

man, if mccain’s now afraid to go on larry king, I can’t imagine who will ever get to interview him again. Is it fox only from now on?

Posted by: jrc | September 2, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Republicans can’t stand up on their own.
Now even McCain can’t appear on anything but Fox Noise without crying.
Pathetic. McCain is just like Bush and Cheney.
Weak.

Posted by: James | September 2, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

tim:
Why does Sarah Palin hate America?

Posted by: quiot | September 3, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I think what democrats don’t understand is that Republicans respect Joe because he like McCain works across party lines to do what he thinks is right. That is the very reason why many democrats kicked Lieberman to the streets. Kerry actually told Lieberman not to speak at the RNC. Obama like Lieberman said has never even tried to reach across party lines so that things may be accomplished. McCain and Lieberman put country first. Obama places party over country.

Posted by: Female | September 3, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

There were several Campbell Brown interviews where she was completely obnoxious, sneering and laughing at Sarah Palin, calling her a bad mother. I guess since she has a newborn, she is the expert now. I am glad McCain is hitting back at the totally biased media, so in the tank for Obama they can’t see straight. Why should McCain give them his time?

Posted by: CS | September 3, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

The American public is not going to fall for Rovian tactics (i.e. real journalism hyped look like bad thing).
The sad part is that these tactics are tarnishing McCains reputation as a stand-up type of Republican/politician…

Posted by: FYI | September 3, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

When did journalism become a bad thing?
Why can’t journalists ask about the candidates experience w/foreign policy?

Posted by: MI | September 3, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

Jake, here is what is unfair about that interview. I think a good definition of fair is treating both sides the same. Here’s a simple test of whether Campbell Brown’s interview of Sen. McCain’s spokesman was fair. CNN should show its viewers video of a CNN reporter asking Sen. Obama or one his spokespeople a question as many times as Ms. Brown asked the McCain representative and with the same duration and ferocity. If CNN can show the video, then I say CNN is fair. If CNN can’t (and I don’t think CNN will be able to), then CNN should apologize and do a better job of delivering the fairness CNN has promised.

Posted by: Stevereno | September 3, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

“This is a Pesidential campaing. Nothing is private.”
Not for Republicans, for certain.
Watch this.
Obama has two young daughters. Michelle Obama has had a job for their entire lives. So has Obama.
Who raised them?
When did anyone ask Michelle how she could have a job and be a mother? Who asked how Obama could be a Senator AND a father? Who asked how both of them could be working and still be parents?

Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Why did Brown continually insist on comparing the Presidential candidate to the VP candidate?
That’s loopy to start with.
Palin has had more executive experience than Obama. Far more.
Obama claimed that his running his campaign was “executive” experience. Now that’s funny.

Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Tim: “what makes palin a bad choice for v.p for mccain??”
Answer because it destroys Obama. Obama’s supporters are trying to do what Biden did to Bork.

Posted by: geevill | September 3, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Palin was a member of an Alaska secessionist party.
While she is dazzling, and to be admired on certain levels, it is odd that a seccessionist candidate was chosen as a VP running mate.

Posted by: MI | September 3, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

I had watched the interview. CNN reported was fine. Republican person attempted to avoid the question and would not answer. CNN reported said all she wanted was an answer. Republican person declined. I actually saw Republican was not prepared to defend Palin when actually he could have. CNN reporter said she did not want to offend anyone one but she just wanted to ask for an example of how/what experience Governor Palin does have. Republicans were claiming she i experienced. Republican got very defnesive. But then I have seen John McCain get very defensive as well. John McCain got irrate. I think interview was fine and saw no problem. Sounds like McCain Campaign is mad at CNN. McCain refused to be on CNN last night.

Posted by: Sharonklim | September 3, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

“Palin was a member of an Alaska secessionist party.”
No, this is not true.

Posted by: drjohn | September 3, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Palin’s husband was a member of Alaska’s secessionist party for many years.
Sarah Palin repeatedly spoke at the secessionist meetings. IN 2008 SARAH PALIN SPOKE AT THE SECESSIONIST’S CONVENTION.
Sarah Palin’s sympathies for the secessionist movement are inferred from her willingness to ally herself with a right-wing fringe group that wants to secede from the United States and her husband’s years long membership in the group.
Republicans are now defending Sarah Palin’s associations with an anti-American secessionist movement.
Now the Republicans are attacking the media for reporting inconvenient facts. It’s a VERY OLD REPUBLICAN STRATEGY TO ATTACK THE PRESS.

Posted by: Patriotic American | September 3, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Have you been reading the garbage that the media is throwing at Palin? These are the same guys that are NOT telling the Rezko investigation.
Look I was for Clinton….now I’m shifting parties. I have definitely been paying attention to the media bias.
68% of the public thinks the media is trying to get their candidate elected….their candidate is Obama. Maybe the public is wrong.
Maybe not the media hasn’t even admitted bias in their demonization of Hillary Clinton as a campaign tactic for Obama.

Posted by: Jackie | September 7, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.