McCain on AIG
His campaign is first to issue a statement:
"Today, the government was forced to commit $85 billion to stop the collapse of AIG, another in a growing series of events that includes Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. These actions stem from failed regulation, reckless management, and a casino culture on Wall Street that has crippled one of the most important companies in America. The focus of any such action should be to protect the millions of Americans who hold insurance policies, retirement plans and other accounts with AIG. We must not bailout the management and speculators who created this mess. They had months of warnings following the Bear Stearns debacle, and they failed to act.
"We should never again allow the United States to be in this position. We need strong and effective regulation, a return to job-creating growth and a restoration of ethics and the social contract between businesses and America. Important questions remain to be answered by Wall Street. Did executives mislead investors and regulators about the severity of the problem? We must investigate whether or not there was misrepresentation on part of the company executives. If there was, there must be penalties. We need to change the way Washington and Wall Street does business, and as president, I will."
Sen. McCain discussed his thoughts on the bailout of the insurance giant on ABC’s "Good Morning America."
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
McCain states “We need strong and effective regulation” – This is coming from a man who fought for deregulation and has a campaign run by lobbyist who fight such legislation? This coming from a man who now has to lie about his crowd size? Thanks , but no thanks – McCain can keep his snake oil.
Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Question for Jake: Are these people part of the 1% Obama is gonna tax to give to the 95% who will get a tax break?
Posted by: Maria | September 17, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Exactly! He doesn’t know what he’s talking about! Pathetic!
Posted by: carmen | September 17, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
McCain received $117,500 from Lehman Bros.
Obama received $370,524(!!) from Lehman Bros.
John McCain got $36,875 from AIG
Barack Obama raked in $75,899
Top Recipients of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
1. Dodd, Christopher $165,400 in 15 years
2. Obama, Barack $126,349 in 3 years!!
***CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN!!!
Posted by: Rick | September 17, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
As his poll numbers drop he will do and say anything.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 17, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
“fundamentally I am a deregulator” – John McCain
Posted by: Danny | September 17, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
we have a commission is’s called THE COMMERCE COMMITTEE which McCain has been the CHAIRMAN of for years. McGoo was blindsided.
the maverick has been asleep
Posted by: watching | September 17, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
McCain is a tired old fool. He is lying and he is backtracking on everything he believed in. At what point does his crazy-talk stop, or has he had a complete mental breakdown?! Surely, he knows he’s talking out of his ass — or maybe he doesn’t. Someone call an ambulance!!
Posted by: hang | September 17, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
McCain pushed through legislation sponsored by Sen. Phil Gramm, who is an economic adviser to his campaign. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act aimed to make the country’s financial institutions competitive by removing the Depression-era walls between banking, investment and insurance companies. hmmmm….. I wonder where the problem is? darn this financial crisis!
Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
How do Republicans really feel about this? For my entire life, they have been touting the benefits of a smaller government with less regulation. Now they want more regulation. Where is the Republican party?
Who believes the Republicans will favor more regulation of the banking and housing industry that was acting like the wild west in recent years? Phil Gramm was the one that deregulated the industry in the first place.
Posted by: MikeNJ | September 17, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
All you need to do is look at McCain’s record. He has NEVER supported regulation. He has ALWAYS clearly stated that he supports deregulation. Even now, he refers to existing regulation as “handicapping” our markets, as if less rules and a more “pure” market would lead to better results.
Imagine for a second your social security being bound up in McCain’s market. Then a “correction” hits…
Posted by: PJ | September 17, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
“These actions stem from failed regulation, reckless management, and a casino culture on Wall Street…”
The missing part of that sentence is: “that I, and my good friend and adviser Phil Gramm, helped to put in place when we repealed the Glass-Steagall Act.”
And yes, I know Clinton signed it. That doesn’t change anything.
Posted by: dadanarchist | September 17, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
This likely is a smokescreen as this reflects contributions of employees. Are you saying the fact that the receptionist at Lehman who contributed to Obama should be in the same category as the partner who contributed to McCain?
McCain received $117,500 from Lehman Bros.
Obama received $370,524(!!) from Lehman Bros.
John McCain got $36,875 from AIG
Barack Obama raked in $75,899
Top Recipients of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
1. Dodd, Christopher $165,400 in 15 years
2. Obama, Barack $126,349 in 3 years!!
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 17, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
PJ is correct, McCain has always been for deregulation, first and foremost. It is this that has landed us in these very risky economic problems.
Posted by: countallthevotes | September 17, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
John McCain:
“One day he says one thing, and the next day he will say something else.”
Not quite as catchy as Country First.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 17, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Ask McCain about the Keating Five during the Savinga and Laon Crisis. I guess his judgement on the economy isn’t really great.
Posted by: cindyct | September 17, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
McCain just said he’d find some other people who know what’s going on to fix the economy.
Posted by: Danny | September 17, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
I wonder who wrote this for mccain since he’s already said he doesn’t really understand economics.
Posted by: pt | September 17, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Rick…the money comes from the employees of those companies and do not represent the companies themselves. The total amount each person can give is $2300. All that says is that more of them think Obama would be a better President.
Posted by: Mary | September 17, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
WHY DOES JOHN MCCAIN FAVOR ME GIVING 1 GREEDY BUSINESS $425 OUT OF MY POCKET but won’t give me a middle income taxpayer a decent tax cut?
*Assumes 200 million taxpayers
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 17, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Funny I didn’t hear any outcry when stocks were soaring upwards and home prices were rising. In fact, when John McCain warned that Fannie and Freddie were headed for disaster, Congress blocked any interference that might have helped avert the financial meltdown America is now in. Everybody in America felt they were entitled to a home – and Washington was glad to sit back and let the economy roar.
Well, America’s chickens are coming home to roost. And there’s plenty of blame to go around from Wall Street to Washington to the Americans who knew they were in over their heads and now want to play the hapless victims.
America has been long overdue for a “correction”. We avoided it when the dot.com bubble burst; we avoided it after 9/11; we cannot avoid it forever. And as hurtful as this is, the longer we put if off the more painful it will be.
Posted by: marylou | September 17, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Take into account Freddie and Fannie and John McCain wants the average taxpayer to give BIG GREEDY BUSINESSES ABOUT $1600 BUT I DON’T CONTRIBUTE ENOUGH TO WARRANT A TAX CUT.
The bailouts are going to disproportionately hit lower income folks–there are more of us.
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 17, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
McCain campaign clamps down on questions in Alaska – From Yahoo
JUNEAU, Alaska – GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin is effectively turning over questions about her record as Alaska’s governor to John McCain’s political campaign, part of an ambitious Republican strategy to limit any embarrassing disclosures and carefully shape her image for voters in the rest of the country.Republican efforts include dispatching a former top U.S. terrorism prosecutor from New York, Ed O’Callaghan, to assist Palin’s personal lawyer working to derail or delay a pending ethics investigation in Alaska. The probe, known as “Troopergate,” is examining whether the governor abused her power by trying to remove her former brother-in-law as a state trooper.
When a reporter for The Associated Press asked the state’s Department of Health and Social Services about lawsuits involving state health policies, he was directed to call Meg Stapleton, a former spokeswoman for Palin now working for McCain.
She’s no change agent, she’s just the same. She lies a lot too and she can’t be trusted.
Posted by: geevill | September 17, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
McCain is an inventor, wow that’s cool. He invented the Blackberry, wow. Next thing you’ll hear is McCain invented the air planes. What a joke, he can’t even use a computer. Lies, lies and more lies.
Posted by: geevill | September 17, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Is it me or was it just completely awkward when says of the people he had dinner with that “they are the fundamentals of the economy and they are strong.” That’s not how you talk about people. Nice try McCain, trying to cover up your gaffe.
Posted by: henry v | September 17, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
McCain sounds like his having early Alzhiemer.
Posted by: Y | September 17, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
McCain has a pronounced
distaste for dealing with
domestic problems – whether
it is energy, economy,
health care or any other
issue.
Since the end of the Vietnam
war he has spent all his
waking hours promoting himself
as a war hero and a self-appointed
protector of homeland security.
He has been so successful at it
that even in this presidential
contest, his opponents both
Republican and Democratic, until
just recently, would not think
of speaking to him directly without
first acknowledging his military
service, whether they were in
his presence in a debate, or they
were discussing him and his
policies in a tv interview.
Posted by: anon | September 17, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Deregulate and bailout, then regulate again? This appears to be what McCain advocates after years of supporting legislation that has deregulated the financial services industry. Phil Gramm one of his economic advisers help to blur the lines of between these industries through sponsored legislation and lobbying. Now McCain wants to clean up Wall Street?
Posted by: SET | September 17, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
lets get a commision together so we can study this stuff for years and then after weve stalled and the economy is crap and the reports are finally filed, ill make a decision on what to do…
mccain has failed…..
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Ron Paul predicted all of this years ago. Why were republicans dumb enough not to vote for someone that actually has a stated interest in economics? Oh ya, republicans want to slaughter Persians. I forgot.
Posted by: Huh | September 17, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Bhrandon – I’d rather see an objective commission really digging into the drivers of the financial markets struggles and the best way to correct them, then Pelosi/Reid marching more CEOs into Congress to “probe” why they and Republicans are the ones to blame.
Posted by: CHG | September 17, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
It is so funny how McCain talks about economy when he previously admits that he does not know much about Economy. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. He should not be trusted at all……
Posted by: HAHA | September 17, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Who knew there were so many economic experts out there. Someone pls tell the rest of us, specifically, which part of Gramm-Leach-Bliley lead firms to make bad business decisions and what regulation/oversight by the federal government would have stopped that? Let’s also discuss how Dems would have/will manage the financial firm failures differently?
Posted by: Ferg | September 17, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Ferg – Ultimately this crisis lies at the feet of the Federal Reserve. They put this aweful bubble in motion.
Posted by: Ben Straub | September 17, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
It is so funny how McCain talks about economy when he previously admitted that he does not know much about Economy. HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. He should not be trusted at all……
Posted by: HAHA | September 17, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
McCain voted to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act, Clinton signed it, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bought gobs of risky products because of it. Of course Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac became Golden Parachute Central for the Clinton AND Bush administrations. It’s where political hacks got rewarded, plain and simple. Pelosi’s “investigation” will be a sham because if it isn’t, the perp walk will look like the guests going through the receiving line at an Innaugural Ball, and neither party wants that.
Posted by: Woody | September 17, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
McCain is going to “drain the swamp”.
by draining Wall Street now awash in losses and discharge those losses onto
Main Street.
Posted by: anon | September 17, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
McCain is going to “drain the swamp”
by draining Wall Street now
awash in losses and discharge
those losses onto Main Street.
Posted by: anon | September 17, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Actually, McCain said he did not know as much as he should. Well, guess what? None of the politicians do, including Obama. That’s why every single one of them has advisors.
As for the Glass-Steagall Act, it was established in 1933, was extremelly outdated, did not represent the times, and had problems. That was why the Act was repealled and why Clinton agreed with having that Act repealled.
Posted by: Mikah | September 17, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Dear John….
Please stop switching your positions on the economic issues so fast…. I can’t keep up with you.
Posted by: Ron | September 17, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
OBAMA has ZERO experience, yet he is at the top of the ticket. Sarah Palin has made more executive decisions as a Mayor and Governor than Barack Obama has made in his life. Yet she is at the bottom of the ticket.
MCCAIN-PALIN 2008, HERO NOT ZERO
Posted by: Alexy | September 17, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Alexy
Look what experienced people did to our country. I will rather vote for someone who has less experience but smart and well educated.
Posted by: HAHA | September 17, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
McCain and Palin are ‘disappointed’ about the taxpayer bailout of AIG. McCain vows to keep American jobs and assets safe. Apparently, he won’t ‘tolerate’ a system that puts American families at risk. I wonder if this intolerance shares any commonalities with the way that he also doesn’t tolerate terrorists. And as with that problem, is there any hint of acknowledging a degree of shared responsibility? Doesn’t McCain perhaps participate in this system that he won’t tolerate? Or is it that he does tolerate it now, and has tolerated it in the past, but plans on stopping tolerating it if he gets elected?
Posted by: JEM | September 17, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Can anyone doubt that the current crisis would never have happened if Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had only financed 30-year fixed rate mortgages with 20% down payments? It was their suppport for hundreds of billions of dollars worth of crappy mortgage paper that lies at the heart of the crisis in the financial system. Those crappy mortgages were sliced and diced and securitized and sold all over the world and now underly the toxic paper that befouls so many balance sheets.
You might want to ask who enabled Fannie and Freddie to do this, before you start pointing fingers. Hint: Who is it that is still, to this day, insisting that Fannie and Freddie continue to finance no-money-down mortgages? (Answer: Cong. Barney Frank and Sen. Christopher Dodd.)
Posted by: DBL | September 17, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
hey CHG , is there any particular reason we couldnt do both?
sounds like you are somehow connected to investment banking upper management to me…most probably a republican in upper management somewhere trying to pass the buck.
this is a REPUBLICAN problem. THE REPUBLICANS have had the lions share of power in the senate and congress and white house for WAY TOO LONG AND THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LET ONE PARTY RUN THE SHOW WITH NO OVERSIGHT!!!
i dont want to hear any blame laid on any democrats for the last 4 sessions of the house and senate ,the democrats have been muted and unheard for the most part , so dont start blaming the democrats for overtly republican policies that were rammed down their throats because YOU the moronic voter allowed to to be that way…
THE MORAL OF THIS STORY/FIASCO? YOU CANT HAVE A SOLID REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT WITHOUT BIG TIME (REPUBLICAN LEGALIZED) SWEETHEART DEALS,EARMARKS ,GRAFT AND CORRUPTION,BLAH BLAH BLAH…ITS DISGUSTING AND THEY ARE ALL ELITISTS AND DO NOT CARE ABOUT ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE PROFIT MARGIN ON THEIR GLUTTED PORTFOLIOS.
LOOK AT THE REVERSE SOCIALISM THAT THE REPUBLICANS ( THE FED AND TREASURY DEPT.) ARE GOING TO USE TO MAKE WHAT SHOULD BE A RUDE AWAKENING FOR THE CONNIVING BANKING CHEATERS INTO A SOFT GOLDEN PARACHUTE LANDING FOR THE RICH AND POWERFUL…
…sigh…
Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
yes JEM ,we know that those 2 democrats you named caused ALL these current financial sector problems, never mind that the republicans have had total majority control (ie;ability to pass whatever fatcat appeasing legislation they want regardless of democratic opposition) of the senate , congress and oval office until just recently.
ok blame 2 ,(evidently extremely powerful/snicker/) democrats . those 2 whipcrackers carry enough clout to stop the war in iraq too i guess . thats a good one isnt it?
thats a little bit of the most simplistic finger pointing i have personally ever seen, and fairly typical of someone who is ,politically speaking , “wearing blinders”.
Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
opps last comment was @ DBL
Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
interested folks might want to ask themselves too why a fannie mae or freddie mac ever had to be invented to begin with?
thats because the republican game plan of corporate profits and big businesses first/everything else is insignificant of the last 50 years(since nixon) has made it NEXT TO IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE WORKING PERSON TO SAVE ENOUGH TO BUY A HOME W/ 20% DOWN WHILE THEY ARE TRYING TO JUST SURVIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
dont blame the democrats for at least trying to give the little guy in the picture at least a chance to get something he probably could never get any other way. especially considering the fact he is having to compete daily with illegal aliens the government is hauling in day to day under the guise of a quaint and non alarming sounding “guest worker” program.another republican gem pos legislation that sticks it to the american worker while rewarding almost inconceivably unethical business behavior.
Posted by: bah | September 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Palin’s fiscal skills:
As mayor put her town deep
in hock to the tune of
22 million dollars.
Her ethics or lack thereof:
Currently under investigation
for ethics violations and
abuse of power as governor.
Doing her level best to block
the probe after first promising
full cooperation.
Posted by: anon | September 17, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
These firms that have supported Mr. McCain with campaign donations for decades now need to be bailed out??? Why is John McCain’s hypocrisy so evident? Does he think he is smart, or we are stupid?
Posted by: nativegirl | September 30, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am