By Nitya

Sep 22, 2008 8:11am

McCain-Palin Media Avoidance Watch, Continued

It’s been 24 days since Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was introduced to the nation as Sen. John McCain’s choice to be a heartbeat away from leadership of the Free World. And though McCain reassures all skeptics that Palin — who got her first passport two years ago — is "absolutely" prepared to be president, the way campaign officials have protected her from her press corps does not necessarily suggest that they hold her ability to handle such a routine event — a press conference — in high regard.

The Washington Post editorialized yesterday about this, writing that "McCain’s selection of an inexperienced and relatively unknown figure was unsettling, and the campaign’s decision to keep her sequestered from serious interchanges with reporters and voters serves only to deepen the unease. Mr. McCain is entitled to choose the person he thinks would be best for the job. He is not entitled to keep the public from being able to make an informed assessment of that judgment. Ms. Palin’s speech-making skills are impressive, but the more she repeats the same stump speech lines, the queasier we get. Nor have her answers to the gentle questioning she has encountered provided any confidence that Ms. Palin has a grasp of the issues."

McCain, himself, was once the most accessible presidential candidate in modern history; he once pledged to hold weekly news conferences if elected president. But he, himself, has gone 40 days without taking questions from his press corps, his last media availability having been on Aug. 13 in Birmingham, Mich.

Early on in this campaign, before McCain began his media avoidance strategy, the McCain campaign would muse aloud about how relatively inaccessible Sen. Barack Obama was. Why was he afraid of answering questions? they would ask. Weren’t we in the press corps insulted? Didn’t the American people see how cowardly this was of Obama, the disdain it showed he had for accountability?

Ahem.

– jpt

User Comments

Jake, once again you seem to be out of the loop. Palin was there for the 60,000 people in Florida yesterday. Where were you?

Posted by: jim | September 22, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Whine, whine, whine.
And yet 60,000 people turned out to see Palin in Florida. Why is that? Did they care that Time or Newsweek or the NY Times or Jack Tapper (ABC News’ SENIOR National Correspondent) did not get to ask questions of Palin that they have never asked Obama or Biden?
The MSMedia has made itself irrelevant by being so biased to helping Obama get elected.

Posted by: Zank | September 22, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

The media is in a tizzy because they are not being allowed to play kingmaker. Given the explicit Obama bias by mainstream media, should anyone be surprised that they should not be the arbitrator in who is prepare or not?

Posted by: Captain America | September 22, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Jake, why do you think the major press and alphabet channels (i.e., ABC) are losing readership and viewers? It’s your Obama bias and slanted news coverage. People have other outlets to find the truth, not the shinola peddled by you and yours.

Posted by: Captain America | September 22, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

The longer that Sarah Palin makes no public statement on her own, the more nervous I get.
If it were me, or Hillary, or Michelle, or any other thinking and serious woman, they would be chafing at the bit to prove to the world how worthy they are and fit for public office. That Sarah Palin stands at the podium to “recite” her lines without any appearance of wanting to break out of the “mold” makes me VERY uneasy.

Posted by: Sara | September 22, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Looks like we could use a few “cutbacks” in the news media. They really never did their jobs and now we don’t need them.

Posted by: JAS | September 22, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

I hear Biden’s available for an interview, coffee, back rub or anything else. Any takers? Anyone?

Posted by: Steve | September 22, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

The McCain/Palin ticket even has an integrity problem when it comes to crowd size. When you resort to lying about something as trivial as crowd size on several occasions, why would anyone trust them in the WH?
From the Miami Herald:
“But Palin drew thousands more than the estimated 20,000 people that turned out for Bush. A fire rescue official estimated the crowd at 25,000 to 30,000″

Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Gathering 60000 people is something the party organizers do. The reality is that Palin cannot answer questions because she has no knowledge about issues and no experience to answer these questions. The more questions answered the more Palin appears like an amateur, a high school grader and that is a reality. McSame is sequestrating Miss Alaska Congeniality.

Posted by: BKMC | September 22, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

That wasn’t 60,000. Once again, McCain is inflating the numbers. Just happened to be an OUTSIDE rally with no tickets and no REAL way to justify the number of people. They have been lying about rally totals in the past. I saw the pics of the Crowd. I’ve seen 60,000 packed in a stadium. That was NOT 60,00.

Posted by: Joe | September 22, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Jake,
The press is carrying the water for the liberals. You mention whatever the liberals smear Palin and McCain with without fact checking, then you complain that Palin and McCain won’t talk to you.
Please do yourself a favor and watch 60 minutes from last night. The questions that Scott Pelley asked McCain about Palin came right from the liberals.
Thanks to sites like Newsbusters can we see these things.
The message you (and the rest of the media) need to hear is that we completely see you as part of the Democratic Party. So why would McCain or Palin want to answer questions from you and your liberal media friends?

Posted by: Bob | September 22, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

If McCain and Palin are avoiding the media and connecting with the American people now, when they are trying to win this election, imagine if they are elected…I worry that when we need to know facts that we have a right to know, they will avoid communicating with us, too!!! Obama/Biden ’08!!!

Posted by: VITAL2U | September 22, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

OK forget the press. If Palin is asking for our votes she could at least answer a couple questions from 60,000 Americans.
seriously are we asking for a 100% scripted leader, never being asked to evenslightly be out of her comfort zone.- SCARY time in America

Posted by: watching | September 22, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

I don’t care about the 60,000 attendees at rallys….I need to see her interviewed one on one with Matt Lauer, Diane Sawyer or Barbara Walters….what is she hiding? Oh, I know…her lack of knowledge and experience. If I’m wrong, please prove it.

Posted by: VITAL2U | September 22, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

I want to Know who she LIED to the most, Mr. Gibson or Sean Hannity; Wasila or Juneau Alaska; Alaskan Independence Party or Republicans; Alaska State or McCain; America or Pit Bulls?
Remember, Two-Face was a Batman villan. Where is Batman, when we need him?

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Palin is BLANK!! she couldn’t answer questions from the press nor from the american people. Palin needs to speak up so the public knows where she stands.
Why is the McCain camp hiding her. Karl Rove could you ask Palin to come out and hold some town hall meetings with the public??

Posted by: Shiny | September 22, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

The McCain/Palin ticket not addressing the press is the same as them not addressing the American people. The speeches are nothing more than propaganda at this point since they are so filled with distortions. I don’t live in this country to “fall in line” – I want answers to real questions. If Palin is not ready for our press, she ill-equipped for the White House.

Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Folks, the point is not their availability to the people, but making themselves available so the media can question them publically about the issues.
The McCain/Palin ticket have avoided these interviews/conferences because they don’t want the public to know that their policies are not much different from the Bush admin.
And they are protecting Palin, so that people will stupidly vote for her before they really understand her radical views. Why do you think McCain sent a team to Alaska to “put the skids” on the ongoing investigation of corruption under Palin? WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Posted by: newvoter | September 22, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

I guess it has not occurred to the MSM that they are being BOYCOTTED.
Personally, I watched ABC News faithfully for decades, but have not tuned in for weeks. I watched CNN during the Conventions, because they were the only ones not breaking in during the speeches. But shortly following the RNC Convention, they too went right back to their Obama slanted reporting and McCain/Palin bashing.
It’s not that I don’t expect the media to report on negative items regarding the candidates, I just don’t think it’s right to report completely positive stories on one party, and nothing but negative on the other……
Start reporting the news in an unbiased manner, MSM, and maybe then we will find something suspicious with a candidate avoiding the media……..

Posted by: Lee | September 22, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

TALK ABOUT THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK!!!!!! OBAMA AVOIDS CONFRONTATIONS LIKE THE PLAGUE!! ONLY AGREED TO A TOWN HALL MEETNG WITH MCCAIN
…. GET THIS – IF WERE HELD ONLY ON the EVENING ON JULY FOURTH!!! DUH!! Obama would only come on the Factor with Bill – DURING THE BIGGEST NIGHT OF THE REP CONVENTION. TALK ABOUT OBAMA BEING A POLITICAL HACK!!

Posted by: Temagami | September 22, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Shiny…Palin attended a “staged” Town Hall meeting with McCain and repeated the same ole grap…bridge to nowhere, drilling,and this is my “first dude” crap…

Posted by: formerhillary | September 22, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Lee says “Personally, I watched ABC News faithfully for decades, but have not tuned in for weeks.”
*********************************************
Yet, you are on the ABC WEB site posting on this BLOG.?….?

Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

With all due respect, Jake, would YOU want to talk to the press if you were Sarah Palin? You guys have behaved like a bunch of vultures, hoping for her political death. Hell, I’d avoid you at all costs too.

Posted by: mak | September 22, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

That was petty slick what they did for Palin in her upcoming debate with Biden. She now becomes the 90 second VP candidate. Do the voters need a 90 second VP a heart beat away from the Presidency? She will not answer any more questions with the reporters or do interviews with Meet the Press or This Week with George. Its called running out the clock.

Posted by: Bobby | September 22, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Paige:
Well, in case you haven’t noticed, sometimes the blogosphere is the ONLY place you can find news items, particularly ones the MSM, in their slanted reporting, does not wish to report upon, such as the criminal investigation into the Palin email hacking.
For some reason, no follow-up stories have appeared in the major news networks since the story originally broke almost a week ago…………
If the victim had been a Democratic candidate, the MSM would have had updates on an hourly basis…

Posted by: Lee | September 22, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

The media APPEARS Leftist because so many Americans have been brainwashed to be Far-Right and watch Faux-News.
By the way, where are her taxes?

Posted by: Average Joe | September 22, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Tem…I beg to differ….Obama has been on O’Reilly, 20/20, schools, Town Halls…he is open to all questions and ready to answer.
Although, it may not be the answer you right wingers are looking for…

Posted by: thetruth | September 22, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Average….Ya…………..where are her taxes……PONY UP, PALIN…

Posted by: formerhillary | September 22, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

So, McCain-Palin play by Obama rules, and Tapper’s suddenly outraged? The faux exasperation isn’t credible! Because, frankly Jake, it’s “dah Rulz” that the press established. Ask no probing questions, investigate no squeamish subjects, put nothing in context, don’t investigate, and merely assume the best of Candidate Obama.
The press has established the view that soundbites matter and actions don’t. So, the press concludes that Obama’s claim to be post-partisan is legitimate, belying the fact that in his entire career he has shown no tendency to adhere to anything but a liberal orthodoxy.
Further, the press never investigated or challenged anything, allowing narratives such as “Obama was raised by a single mother on food stamps” to become his biography when in fact he was a child of upper-middle class privilege and affluence. The majority of the press has left completely untouched the “pay for play” way that Chicago politics are played, completely ignoring the fact that Governor Palin took on entrenched interests and has refused “pay-play politics” as usual.
Obama got nothing but the gentlest, most coddling of questions from journalists for 18 months, it’s clear that the press wants nothing but to play “gotcha journalism” with Governor Palin, and that there will be no attempt to treat her fairly.
You’ve made your own bed, so cry me no river, Mr. Tapper . . .

Posted by: Chad3337 | September 22, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

60,000 – come on that figure is highly inflated – she couldn’t draw a crowd of 60,000 with a crayon…

Posted by: jozy | September 22, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

say what you want. Obama has taken interviews and questions for over a year. Most recently a press conference last week and one on one with FOX,O’riley and others.
Palins only and most extensive interview was with the biggest Obama hater in the world- Hannity.(not even a question from spineless Combs)

Posted by: reality | September 22, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

@Lee: Maybe if there were a positive side to McCain’s campaign they would report on it, but they can’t make stuff up, unlike the McCain camp.

Posted by: Millie | September 22, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

Just going by facts and actions i don’t think it sexist to say
Palin seems to be nothing more than a CHEERLEADER.

Posted by: watching | September 22, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

the truth.
Obama DID come on the Factor – THE BIGGEST NIGHT OF THE REP CONVNTION – BILL TOOK A LOT OF HEAT FOR THAT, ALSO, BUT OBAMA GAVE HIM NO CHOICE. 20/20, A CONFRONTATIONAL EXPERIENCE FOR OBAMA? LOL

Posted by: Temagami | September 22, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

jozy
Sorry, those 60,000 figures are ABCs also. SO, YOU LIBS HAVE BEEN REDUCED TO ARGUING ABOUT GOV. PALIN’S CROWD SIZE? A LITTLE DESPERATION SETTING IN?

Posted by: Temagami | September 22, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Why are the officials in Alaska letting McCain’s campaign take over their state? It is the right and obligation of the media to ask the tough questions of Palin and everyone else. Officials looking into the allegations involving the trooper firing should be fully and DIRECTLY available to all media. They alone should answer any and all questions the the people in Alaska should not put up with having their information sanitized through the McCain campaign staff.

Posted by: Bob of Springfield | September 22, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

It is also the right and responsibility of the media to follow the criminal investigation on the Palin email hacking. There is a suspect, and searches have been conducted.
So where’s the stories in the MSM about this?
Seems to be a very large silence about that aspect of covering Governor Palin.

Posted by: Lee | September 22, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

For the McCain/Palin supporters: why are you not upset that the VP candidate will not answer unfiltered questions for us? These are our public servants. This is not a monarchy. Media access isn’t to serve the media’s needs; it’s to serve OUR needs. It’s our job to hold politicians’ feet to the fire. I don’t think reading canned lines on a stump serves any of us (this applies to all candidates, not just Palin). All of the candidates should be available for unfiltered questioning.

Posted by: Marybeth | September 22, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

I am hoping Jake will pick up on the story about team Obama hiring a PR firm to smear Sarah Palin.

Posted by: drjohn | September 22, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Lee- Actually the Washington Post had a story on the e-mail hack in Sunday’s edition. While the hacking is completely out of bounds (just as someone hacked Paris Hilton’s account) it draws bigger questions to light for your candidate. Questions which she refuses to answer. Why was she using such a non-secure, private e-mail account for government business? It’s ILLEGAL.. Be careful what you ask for Lee…

Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Paige
For what business did she use the account?
This ought to be easy to answer.

Posted by: drjohn | September 22, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

When was the last time Obama answered questions?

Posted by: drjohn | September 22, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Lee
I have been wondering about that. Last week I heard on radio that thay found the guy – son of some democrat office holder, I think somewhere in the SE, but then TOTAL SILENCE!! NOTHING!! IS THIS A COVER-UP OR HAVE THEY GOT THE WRONG GUY??

Posted by: Manitu | September 22, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

I know you Republicans really want to win, no matter what. And I know you really want to feel good about being Republicans again. But I don’t see how you can fool yourself into “knowing” that Sarah Palin is ready to be president when all you’ve seen her do is stumble through one interview, poorly, and recite over and over and over the same speech, written by Bush’s speechwriter.
If she becomes president–which is a likely scenario–she’ll have to do more than that. She won’t even know who to trust, unless she appoints her Wasilla classmates to the cabinet. Her administration will end up being run by the same puppet-masters who ran Bush’s. The sad thing is, Bush was much more knowledgeable about government and foreign relations when he took office than Sarah Palin is.
Don’t you care about your country? Or do you just care that your team wins?

Posted by: S.L. | September 22, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

When was the last time Obama answered questions?
Posted by: drjohn | Sep 22, 2008 9:39:22 AM
Last Wednesday.

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Folks there is only one reason you don’t have Palin taking questions from the Press — She doesn’t have the answers. I’m not saying shes stupid, she just has no area of expertise to be prepared to address the issues of VP or President. What is really come down to in this country is party first, country second. I’m a life long Democratic and I have at times voted for republicans and supported republican conservative issues. We the people lose when we go lock step with either party. We all bitch that Congress is ineffective because they can’t cross the aisle to get the right things done. Well it’s us that have set that example for them and allowed that bad behavior.
John McCain’s time came and went when Bush screwed McCain in 2000. I’m sure we would have had a better last 8 years had it been John rather that George. But this McCain isn’t the McCain of 2000 and he is out of step with the times.
Do you really feel safe if Palin were to have to assume the role of the President? You want a pro life and ultra conservative for VP, so be it, but this is not the right person. Hey I’m 60, I’m voting for my children and my grandchildren this time around.

Posted by: Sacto | September 22, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

This column proves McCain’s point. When he/Palin don’t take questions, we hear about it from everywhere. When Obama hasn’t taken questions, McCain had to point it out — the media hasn’t complained a bit about that.

Posted by: Jonathan | September 22, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

McCain also succeeded in getting the VP debate format changed so that there would be no exchanges between the two VP candidates.
So, she can just answer the moderator’s questions with talking points.

Posted by: cincyr | September 22, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

McCain is a rich guy who does not understand wealth building and the global economy. By the way he has a low IQ and can’t deal with complex issues like the global economy. Palin is a journalist by profession who is afraid of journalists. Again, she has a low IQ and a MAJOR lack of understanding of global affairs. I doubt that she can even name all 50 states of the union. McCain/ Palin is the great opportunity for MASSIVE POCKET TROUBLES for many families in the US.

Posted by: McChaos | September 22, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

@Jonathan
The press is not complaining about Obama because he’s not avoiding the press. He gave a press conference just last Friday.
And McCain? It’s been 39 days since his last press conference.

Posted by: cincyr | September 22, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

To me, this makes it easier to see that some Politicians want to give people the only limited information, sometimes wrong information, to make their point. Knowing that many in the electorate are uninformed. People, realize that THEY COUNT ON YOU BEING EASILY GUIDED BY THEIR STATEMENTS. Don’t allow yourself to be played like this. You know that people going for the highest office in the land need to be exposed to the press. You know that you want to be sure that the person that could be making decisions that could affect the country/world should have a handle on the issues. Because of partison politics, smart, descent people are saying ridiculous things that are contraty to these ideas. THINK ABOUT WHAT IS AT STAKE! I am a Democrat, but I want the same thing for any Democratic candidate. When the press unmercifuly went over Rev Wright (who is not running for Pres.) for weeks at a time, I was cool only because I expected the same scrutiny for all candidates. Now everyone is crying foul because the press want to ask the Palin a few questiongs on the issues? Republicans, are you aware of what this looks like to others on the outside looking in? It is sort of nuts.

Posted by: Jaram | September 22, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Last I checked Palin has done the same number of interviews as Obama has done in the same time frame. Both have been equivalent to obama’s as well. One hostile opne not. I don’t recall Obama doing too well when O’reilly didn’t fawn over him like the rest of the media do. Not to mention when has Obama given 2 full days to an interviewer? Hell when has Biden answered questions? Also both McCain and Palin have answered voter questions at town halls.
Also Jake try (I know its hard for you) a little honesty, just because he hasn’t answered questions from “his” press corp doesn’t mean he hasn’t answered questions. Just last week he answered questions to a Radio station.

Posted by: Zaggs | September 22, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Obama took questions, last wednesday, after his speech, about the economy.
McCain walked off stage, when reporters were asking questions, on wednesday.
What does McCain know? He knows little about the economy, according to his own words, so he was afraid, the reporters where going to play, ‘stump the candidate’.
How often can we expect Mccain and Palin to hide, if the were in the White House? This is not a good example. Maybe McCain can send out his lobbiest to talk for him.

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

drjohn- McClatchy News out of Anchorage:
“Palin routinely uses a private Yahoo e-mail account to conduct state business. Others in the governor’s office sometimes use personal e-mail accounts, too.”
There’s numerous reports regarding her use of private e-mail for state’s business.

Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Zaggs – Biden has done 55 interviews and press conferences since being named VP. Palin has done ONE. Sorry, the love-fest w/Hannity does not count.

Posted by: Paige | September 22, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Zaggs, when McCain took questions on the radio, he insulted the Spainish leader, by thinking he was in Mexico. Read the European newspapers. They too, are blasting McCain/Palin. Our allies have alredy developed a suspicion of them. Great foreign affair qualities those two have.

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 22, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

LOL, Failin cannot even seem to manage her own teenage daughter so exactly how is she expected to manage the entire world? What a joke. then, lets not forget about the Lying Man McBush himself. God help us all if they win in November.
Susan

Posted by: Susan Redder | September 22, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

It is a joke to me that some of you are trying to defend Palin’s refusal to deal with the media and answer questions. That type of garbage shouldn’t be an acceptable strategy from someone running for city dog catcher let alone from a candidate running for the second highest office in the land. She clearly doesn’t have a grasp of the issues or McCain would have her on every major news outlet just to keep her as the primary topic of the campaign.
Public servants have a duty to be available to the media so those they represent know where they stand on the issues. Keeping Palin from being subjected to the same questions as the other candidates is nothing short of a disgrace to a campaign that has pledged to be honest with the American people.

Posted by: Dubya | September 22, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

This is ridiculous. She should at least be subject to interviews! If she’s so prepared, let her come out and show what she’s got, then they can shut all of us up.
It will be bad if McCain and Palin can give Bush and Cheney a run for their money. I just read the thing about the Spanish leader blunder, and remember McCain’s bomb bomb bomb Iran comment? And then Palin has to say Perhaps So to the possiblity of a Russo-American war (and this one may not be “Cold”, if we’re unfortunate). It doesn’t matter what their intent was- it shows lack of diplomatic tact.

Posted by: Grey Matter | September 22, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

McCain has doene a complete 180

Posted by: FromMyView | September 22, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

A swimmer has the right to sun on the deck when the water is full of sharks and the other swimmer’s coaches are throwing chum into the waters.
So work on your tan lines, Governor. If the coaches want their swimmers to play bait, let them.

Posted by: len | September 22, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Anyone notice that while Democrats were running around screaming about Bush violating everyone’s privacy that it is the Democrats who actually do it?

Posted by: drjohn | September 22, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

When was Bidens last interview.
When did did Obama take tough questions from the press in 20 months of his campaigning?
In history when has the VP candidate ever really went before the press.
Oh by the way was she not interviewed on Fox just last week?
For all you saying that Palin does not have the experience to be VP, what experience does Obama have to be President?
The same questions you ask of her, you should be more asking of Obama, see he is the top of the Dem ticket.
But Hypocrisy at its best,
Journalism has died in 2008!! R.I.P. 1776 – 2008
Journalism started off young and non-partisan tough on the questions
Upon its death and for the 50+ years prior its death it has become weak and controlled by Marxism.
If Palin was a male no one would be saying what they are saying, and it is proven, because no one is asking about Biden.
McCain has learned that the Main stream media is in bed with Obama, that is fact.
Imagine if the 2 CEO’s from Fannie May and Mac who walked away with over 100 million dollars worked on McCains campaign as they do for Obama, it would be front page news forever!!
Obama who received the second most in donations in total since 1989 from Fannie may and mac (and he has only been a Senator for 2 years) imagine if that was McCain!
Jake why are you not reporting on the fact that if the Dems allowed the Republicans to adjust the Fannies and the banking industry in 2003 we would not be in the economic position we are now.
Obama stood in the way of changes to the Fannies because of the money he received from them!!
But but we worry more about a VP candidate!!

Posted by: spock | September 22, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Biden has had 55 interviews since he was chosen, only all the media is so hyped up about Sarah Palin.

Posted by: Grey Matter | September 22, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Dubya – You had a few mistypes in your statement, I corrected them for you to make it more truthful!! –
It is a joke to me that some of you are trying to defend OBAMA’s refusal to deal with the media and answer questions. That type of garbage shouldn’t be an acceptable strategy from someone running for city dog catcher let alone from a candidate running for the THE highest office in the land. HE clearly doesn’t have a grasp of the issues or George Soros would have HIM on every major news outlet just to keep HIM as the primary topic of the campaign.
Public servants have a duty to be available to the media so those they represent know where they stand on the issues. Keeping OBAMA from being subjected to the same questions as the other candidates is nothing short of a disgrace to a campaign that has pledged to be honest with the American people.

Posted by: Spock | September 22, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Grey Matter – I do not call being asked softball questions or being allowed to comment by his employees of the DNC in the media being questioned!!
over 70% of the people now know the media is in bed with the DNC!!

Posted by: spock | September 22, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Grey Matter when did Biden have 55 interviews since he has been chosen there has not even been 55 days!
When was he on FOX (OReilly or Hannity and Colmes)?
On another note when did Obama have 55 interviews in 20 months

Posted by: spock | September 22, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

McChaos – What lies you speak!
Lets give some facts, Obama has on his advisors people directly responsible for the economic issues we are having today.
McCain had the foresight 2-3 years ago to try to fix the Fannies, but the dems refused to allow it, since they get money from them.
Palin was never a reporter or at least a professional one.
I wonder how much more money Obama will earmark for his wife!!

Posted by: spock | September 22, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Oh, those screams of “media bias” from the right. Captain America said he and others are forced away from the MSM to find the “truth.” I guess that means Fox News. They soon forget the joy they felt when the media probed John Edwards, Elliott Spitzer and even Barrack Obama. Sarah Palin could be president (a scary thought). But every day McCain and company keep her sequestered, it does nothing but convince more and more undecided voters she’s not fit for the job. The media freeze-out is backfiring on McCain.

Posted by: jim m | September 22, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Sorry my mistake, Biden has done 84 interviews and press conferences. You can look it up. I suppose he does more then one per day, since he’s made himself easily available for anyone to question.
Palin= 2. This is silly. I want to get a better feel of her, I am sure she can do somemore before the debates or election day.
Franklin Raines isn’t one of Obama’s econ advisors. They just talked to him on general stuff, but not serious econ advice. Now what about Phil Gramm, one of McCain’s actual advisors who had a hand in the Wall Street Fiasco?
P.S Palin thrashes Obama as the one who asked for more federal pork per capita. 1OO over bucks per citizen as opposed to Obama’s 25 bucks.

Posted by: Grey Matter | September 22, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

They are out there meeting voters Jake.

Posted by: geevill | September 22, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

“Palin was never a reporter or at least a professional one.”
Not true. She was a professional sports caster for a TV Station in Alaska. She was good at that too.

Posted by: len | September 22, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

It seems as though Palin could have put the national security of the United States at risk by doing Alaska’s business on an easily accessed Yahoo account.
She’s supposed to know about foreign policy and national security because of her proximity to Russia, yet she couldn’t even protect her own email from a bored college student.

Posted by: Danny | September 22, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

McCain is just shaking afraid he’ll lose whatever little control he’s got left. All we’re left with are lies and bogus claims (like the “60,000 see Palin” lie – it was less than half that).
Obama, for his part, held a PRESS CONFERENCE after his remarks about the economy last week. Look for more, now that the media are FINALLY focusing on real issues instead of baloney like lipstick on pigs and flag pins.
Maybe McCain is scared that the press will finally start asking questions about the Keating Five? Most people don’t know that McCain has a history of serious corruption.

Posted by: Tungsten | September 22, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Exactly…now what about trained IT specialists I’m sure Russia or some other country would have?
Will all the US national security secrets come spilling out and be posted online for all the world to read?

Posted by: Grey Matter | September 22, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

jim m:
At least Fox News is scheduled to have an investigative report on tonight regarding Obama’s ties and relationships with Ayers, Rezko, etc.
A little bit late in my book, but gee, where are the stories in the OTHER major networks regarding this topic??

Posted by: SandyB | September 22, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

“It seems as though Palin could have put the national security of the United States at risk by doing Alaska’s business on an easily accessed Yahoo account.”
If you consider pictures of Trig and the dogs vital national security, you might have a reason to worry.
Otherwise, when a sitting Democratic official’s teen age son commits a felony to help a Democratic nominee for President, you might want to ask if something important has been left on the side of the street to be carried away by the junk collectors, that being, Democratic values?
Do you really think you can win anything of consequence by becoming your own worst nightmare? That seems awfully immature.

Posted by: len | September 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Jake -
Holding the Palin/McCain campaign to consistent standards is an uphill undertaking. They change daily.
The most recent and most egregious example is their ad banging Obama for using Franklin Raines as an economic advisor. The fact that Raines has not and is not a campaign advisor didn’t bother them in the least.
The NY Times reveals today that Palin/McCain Campaign Mgr., Rick Davis, was paid almost $2 million to keep the regulators away from both Frannie and Freddie. What gall!
The shameless double talk of these Rove hacks leaves me whomper-jawed on a daily basis.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

len:
Yes, for how many years did the Democratic Party keep saying “Watergate” any time a question regarding THEIR honesty or integrity was broached by Republicans??
For some reason, when the tables turn, and a DEMOCRAT is hacking a national Republican candidate’s email in a smear attempt, all of a sudden it’s the crime VICTIM’s integrity that is questioned, rather than the CRIMINAL’s.

Posted by: SandyB | September 22, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

len,
There are Democrats and Republicans who aren’t exactly the finest examples of good citizen behaviour.
And why we consider it a risk to Nat Sec? Her behaviour shows a lack of prudence, especially regulations already stipulate that as a state employee, she should be using a secure account instead of free service one which is easier to hack. If she wins, this sort of careless behaviour could be dangerous.

Posted by: Grey Matter | September 22, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Palin is big JOKE…

Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 22, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

There are no minimum
requirements in Alaska
for becoming a governor.
Sarah is
proof of that.

Posted by: anon | September 22, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

And OBAMA answers questions? WHEN??
Must of missed that media day.
Obama is a FRAUD – he cannot answer a question without a prepared response from his campaign.
McCain/Palin – BEST for USA

Posted by: Molly | September 22, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am

He went on Billy O’Reilly, for one.

Posted by: Grey Matter | September 22, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

No need to present her to the media. They have thier mind made up who gets their vote as Gibson, The View, MSNBC, CNN, NYT, etc, etc etc…. have showed the nation. THE NATION KNOWS WHAT IS GOING ON. The only thing keeping obama in this race now is RACE, because 95% of people that look like him are voting for him. Now you try and tell us who the racists are? Yet the press says if Oba loses, its will be because of racism. I say if he wins its because of racism in the Black Community, since they are voting based on the color of his skin. A definition of Racism: when 95% of an ethnic group vote for the most unqualified nominee in history based on the color of his skin. My argument is much more logical.

Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

“And OBAMA answers questions? WHEN??
Must of missed that media day.”
Let’s see in the last week or so he has appeared on Sun morn news & 60 minutes.
The week before he was on O’Reilly and held a press conference.
Joe Biden has had some 80 interviews with national and local media since being selected VP.
The lesson as always?
Right wingers lie.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

It is now 24 days since the hockey mom was announced as a potential president of the United States next January and she still hasn’t given a news conference or has any plans to hold one.
This black-out of all serious press access has never happened in modern American political history before.
It’s what I would call a scandal. Plus it tells us (as does Palin’s Alaskan CV) how secretive a McCain-Palin administration would be.
How DARE she talk about transparency in government and power.

Posted by: It's a SCANDAL | September 22, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

What do you consider all serious press my friend? CNN, NYT, MSNBC, etc etc…. SOrry. I was even considering voting for Obama until I saw all the biased of the press. That makes me sick to my stomach how they kiss and hug this guy in plain VIEW, as Gibson did, and then turn around and villianize the other candidates. The majority of free press in this country is violating the trust of the people in this biased reporting, or should I say, making of the news. Now they have made it obvious the only way for the AMerican people to get an accurate pic of these candidates is through head to head debates. At least it will even the playing ground somewhat. But the lies will continue, the smears, and the left wing elitest media will continue to cover for Their guy.

Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

“McCain himself was once the most accessible presidential candidate in modern history;…But he himself has gone 40 days without taking questions from his press corps”
Why should he subject himself to the liars who smeared him about his “possible” affair and who have produced a series of fairy tales about Sarah Palin?
He would be as crazy as Rev Wright to even talk to the Obama-press.

Posted by: notafool | September 22, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

@grey matter:
Maybe it’s her way of being transparent?
A joke. I agree that people should not be using Yahoo and Gmail for business. On the other hand, if you know web technology, there are far more high value transactions occurring on a very flimsy security system. This is a much bigger problem than Palin’s email. A whole generation of young, old and business alike bought into the web without understanding just how flimsy the Internet is.
Believe it or not, long before TimBL and the Uni of CHI showed you Mosaic, a lot of advanced work in hypermedia systems for world wide distribution was done. The conclusion was the Internet was an inherently unsafe architecture.
That business and people flocked to it reminded me then and to this day of the pool scene in the Magic Christian where Peter Sellars demonstrates to Ringo Starr just how powerful greed really is.
So the real problem of Palin’s email is just how “typical” it really is.

Posted by: len | September 22, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Ryan C.
Like I said, TRY and tell us. I gave you a number that validates racism, you gave me an answer based on nothing but, well just nothing.

Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Again:
Obama’s press availability? I agree that McCain and Palin should be out there answering questions. The same should hold true for Obama, right?

Posted by: Wade | September 22, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

The problem of course is that the answers were:
Weren’t we in the press corps insulted? Clearly not. You were still in the tank for him regardless.
Didn’t the American people see how cowardly this was of Obama, the disdain it showed he had for accountability? Clearly not. As he still has the same % of the vote as McCain.
See… as much as you want this to be Obama vs. Palin, it’s not.
And Obama vs. McCain… just makes The One look smaller and smaller every single day.

Posted by: Chris | September 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Is that Obama o’reilly interview the same one where he said he didn’t know about jeremiah wright’s racist sermons being sold in his church bookstore, despite going there for 20 years?
Yeah, he answers questions real well.

Posted by: biscuits | September 22, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

With the biased media as evidenced by the Charlene Gibson interview, why should she waste her time talking to Obama supporters when she can instead use her time better by talking to real voters like the 60,000+ in Florida over the weekend. Get a life – TappedOut

Posted by: Bill | September 22, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

the last paragraph shows how hypocritical you are. were you complaining about having limited to no access to nobama? then why are we digging into mccain/palin?

Posted by: drewski | September 22, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Mccain will be a joke cum Nov5.
Palin will be history cum Nov5.
Clowns donot take questions from public they only perform and that is what they have been doing. If they start to take questions from public their fake costumes comes off, lies gets revealed.
Obama/Biden08 – Save our 401k retirement

Posted by: tony | September 22, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

why do the media think that presidential candidates have to go through them?
Is this the same media that feels it is important to know about Sarah Palin’s 2nd cousin’s brother’s friend’s former political connections but not important to know about Obama’s past.
The media is a joke

Posted by: Joe | September 22, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Psssst, Jake….Palin’s out in the real world meeting real people and being vetted by them…why would she want to meet with you elitist reporters, so you guys can distort her message like ABC and Charles Gibson did?
No thanks. Like she said in her famous VP acceptance speech–she DOESN’T CARE ABOUT YOUR GOOD OPINION. She’s meeting american people face-to-face who she says she will be working for. Not you guys in the media. Get over your bloated sense of self-importance.

Posted by: MacDem | September 22, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

And who should she speak to? The journalists who are digging for any dirt they can find on her? The ones who accused her of faking a pregnancy? The ones who forced her to announce that her teenage daughter was indeed pregnant, therefore could not possibly be Trigs mother?
She is speaking to the people that matter – voters who come to her rally’s by the thousands. She doesn’t need to speak to a liberal partisan media.

Posted by: Linda | September 22, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Just for the record. Americas freedom of the Press is one of the most important elements of the constitution, helping to ensure that no party or ideology becomes all to influencing in helping the make up our politics. It needs to be balanced. When one side or the other gets too much exposure to the pulic, it becomes dangerous that they will be able to sway public opinion unchallenged. Right now, we are seeing the most extreme, concentrated left wing media bias in the history of our country. Only the blind, ignorant or closed minded can not see this. These news organsation have a duty and they are failing us. They should NOT have an agenda. They should ask each the same questions of each party and allow equal time. They DONT. The FCC needs to look atthese companies and see if they are breaking the rules or the law. They have to be dangerously close. ITs not good for americas media to be so biased.

Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Why is the media not asking relevant questions to Obama? Isn’t he hiding something? His associations, Axelrod’s sneaky ways, etc.?

Posted by: Jenny C. | September 22, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Jake
Just out of curiosity, what good would making he lovely Sarah Palin more available to the press accomplish? I watched the Charles Gibson interview and it was a disgusting display, hard for Mr. Gibson to be fair with a mouthful of Obama.

Posted by: MikeG | September 22, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

I think Tapper gives it to both parties, from where I sit. He must, because he’s got both sides pissed off at the same time.

Posted by: hippie | September 22, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

Gee, I wonder where McCain and Palin have gone off to? If they’re anything like me, they also tend to avoid people who have treated them like crap.

Posted by: DoDoGuRu | September 22, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Why should she? The media has been cruel and biased.

Posted by: Terri Watters | September 22, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Question asked McCain on the View: Why are you a liar?
Question asked Obama on the View: Are you really related to Brad Pitt?
And you wonder why they avoid the media. LOL!

Posted by: linda | September 22, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Oh, and the lefty media are DIS appointed, (hey, does that means appointed to DIS?) that they cant hammer McCain/Palin with their heavy handed bias for one, but the real kicker. Ratings. Palin is still a hot commodity, and she would go a long way to help their dismal ratings. All they would have to do is fair in the interest of whats best for the American people. They simply cant do that. They are politically motivated. They have an agenda to get Obama elected and it is obvious.

Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Andrew Sullivan???? Thats who you go to for advice??? God help you poor soul.

Posted by: WakeUpPeople | September 22, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

When will Hollywood and the media realize most of this country doesn’t respect or trust you anymore. Complain amongst yourselves that you aren’t getting to use your gotcha questions – maybe SNL can do a skit about it!
It must hurt to know that media bias still can’t win the election for the Obamian candidate.
Don’t worry, when your bosses realize that the public doesnt want or need you anymore I’m sure you will be able to get jobs with ACORN!

Posted by: maura | September 22, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Given the way the Gibson interview was edited before being aired I think the media is getting all the time you deserve with her. Not only was her interview edited to simplify her responses, but look at the questions Gibson asked Gov. Palin and Sen. Obama respectively:
First, Obama:
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?
Now Palin:
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
“Hmmm… I wonder why she won’t give us more quotes to truncate and shape to fit the image we are cultivating so carefully?”

Posted by: Mik | September 22, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Unlike democrats in the meda (i.e. most of them), I am not waiting for another ‘who do you think you are’ interview as the one we saw on ABC.
The mainstream media has served us with a staggering amount half-truths and biased articles about the woman they look down on. Palin doesn’t ‘owe’ them anything

Posted by: Arne Billingstad | September 22, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Well you in the media are blood-sucking vultures, go report on Hollywood celebrities and eco-nonsense.

Posted by: syn | September 22, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I believe she has appeared before more folks than Biden. Whats the deal w/Biden?

Posted by: Benjamin9 | September 22, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

I can’t imagine why Palin wouldn’t want to be more accessible to the MSM! I mean, it’s not like the MSM has been slanting its coverage, running hit pieces on her, digging up trash, and asking her questions they would never dare to ask the Obamessiah.
Actually…it’s a lot like that.

Posted by: Crush Liberalism | September 22, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

“Conservatives, talk directly to the people”
How is giving your stump speech for the 20th time talking directly to the people.
That would be talking AT the people.
Candidates who are afraid of questions are poor candidates.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Frankly, if the media would treat me like you people have been treating Mrs Palin… you wouldn’t even get a “hello” from me.
Grow a pair and learn what real journalism is. Little hint: it’s not pushing for the candidate you like while smearing his opponents and lying about them.

Posted by: Takekaze | September 22, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Governor Palin was giving a speech in Florida and should have been speaking in NYC today. The dems managed to get her speech cancelled today by threatening the organizations tax exempt status. Seems there were no threats when only Hillary was scheduled to speak, odd huh?
So fools ask where Palin is.
She’s busy campaigning and at the UN today. She didn’t have to give a speech in Germany to meet a few world leaders unlike Obama’s summer vacay in Europe whirlwind tour that provides his silly “cred”.
Screw the media

Posted by: Cara | September 22, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

pacific moderate: You read Andrew Sullivan?!!! ROFL.

Posted by: ligneus | September 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Why does anyone pay attention to this MSM Liberal Democratic Hack?
The true ‘vetters’ of any politician are not the biased media, it is the voting public.
One does not need to be subjected to a media ‘interview’, which, as was apparent during Gibson’s, was starkly different from the questions he lobbed at Obama: Nothing on his past, nothing on his qualifications, only talking point questions, mostly on Israel & Iran.
No ‘Bush Doctrine’ questions, nothing about agreeing 97% of the time with Democratic Party leadership which garnered the lowest public approval ratings in history.
Is THAT who you want to vet our political candidates?
No Thanks

Posted by: John | September 22, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

“Early on in this campaign, before McCain began his media avoidance strategy, the McCain campaign would muse aloud about how relatively inaccessible Sen. Barack Obama was. Why was he afraid of answering questions? they would ask. Weren’t we in the press corps insulted? Didn’t the American people see how cowardly this was of Obama, the disdain it showed he had for accountability?
Ahem.
– jpt”
This just in: Palin is not running against Obama. Repeat, Palin is not running against Obama!

Posted by: geckomon | September 22, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

The questioning by Charlie Gibson was hardly “gentle”. It was very aggressive, probing, & hostile – perfectly fair, but the editing process chopped out relevant parts of her answers and highlighted parts that made her sound like she hadn’t answered completely. She’s already made arrangements to speak to Katie Couric who will probably also be far from “gentle”. Considering that the media has not be even-handed in its treatment of the two campaigns, I can see why the strategy is limited engagement. Wait for the VP debate if you’re not happy with the interviews by Charlie, Katie, and Sean Hannity.

Posted by: Jill | September 22, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Why are McCain and Palin not making themselves “available” to a hostile press, eager to present them in the worst possible light? A press that has abandoned any pretense of objectivity and sense of fair-play? Gee, I dunno.
In my opinion the press, as it is presently constituted, is the greatest danger our republic faces, or has faced, bar none – since the Civil War. The good thing is, the harder the media presses their collective thumb on the scales, the more apparent their perfidy becomes.

Posted by: David MacKinnon | September 22, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

“Candidates who are afraid of questions are poor candidates.”
Seems to me I recall the challenge of regular ‘town-hall’ type meetings, mano-a-mano, McCain vs. Obama.
It was Obama who rejected them. What exactly is he afraid of?
My guess, he’s afraid of people learning more about who he truly is and what he truly believes. And that would be: A far-left thinking liberal who portrays himself as a ‘change’ candidate when nothing he has done in his political career even resembles change. Has he defied his own party – ever? ( Getting fellow dems thrown off the primary ticket so you can run opposed doesn’t count as defiance against your own party )

Posted by: John | September 22, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

“The true ‘vetters’ of any politician are not the biased media, it is the voting public.”
So John,
How exactly does the public vet the candidates if they are not allowed to ask them any questions?
Do you consider hearing the same stump speech over and over again to be an accurate reflection of the candidate, the candidate’s record and the candidate’s plans?
Do you consider =campaign ads on TV to be an honest representation of the candidate and/or their opponent?
Are you really that stupid?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

The SNL skit Saturday summed up the MSM beautifully. SNL showed the MSM in all it’s disgusting, openly bias, glory.
That should answer your question.
Palin has decided to go straight to the people and skip over the biased MSM. Can’t say I don’t blame her.

Posted by: Stacy | September 22, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Did you see how ABC edited Palin’s responses? If you look at her complete, unedited answers, she did VERY well. The media are shameless liars, like their favorite candidate. I don’t blame him for refusing to get them ratings, and a platform to twist facts and soundbites.

Posted by: mark | September 22, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

The media have been trying to do a drive-by shooting on this woman at every turn. In all my life I have never witnessed anything as obscene and dishonest as what is going on in the media coverage of this election. Why would you think Gov. Palin owes the media anything? The McCain camp is absolutely correct and justified to snub the dishonest journalistic hacks that are trying to destroy her.

Posted by: alex | September 22, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

ryanC:
You wait patiently for the debates instead of settling for biased questioning by liberal hack journalists.

Posted by: linda | September 22, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

What Stacy said at the top.

Posted by: kal | September 22, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Obama: Running for President
Palin: Running for Vice President
Who would we like to see answer more questions, hmmmmmmmmm?
Would you like a list?

Posted by: metalhead | September 22, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

I was at the Palin rally in Fl 60,000 peolpe!! It was amazing so crowded peolpe were turned away! CNN, MSNBC, ABC no coverage, no mention.. nada.. The media is just plain SAD.

Posted by: DREW | September 22, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

When can we expect your “Media Avoidance Watch” update on Mr. Obama’s Wall Street/bailout plan? What does Mr. Obama propose we do about, say, AIG? I suppose we’ll never know until maybe it’s too late since the media doesn’t seem the least bit curious. Oh well. Back to the Bristol Palin ‘scandal’ of the day show…

Posted by: No1Dad | September 22, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

“Seems to me I recall the challenge of regular ‘town-hall’ type meetings, mano-a-mano, McCain vs. Obama.
It was Obama who rejected them. What exactly is he afraid of? ”
McCain offered townhall meetings because he was getting very little media coverage as the Dem primary campaign carried so late into the season.
Obama knew this and said no. He instead offered to debate McCain.
McCain said no.
So in response to Obama rejecting the town halls, the McCain campaign went very negative and sleazy in their advertising.
So basically a feigned call for civility is followed up with relentless mudslinging. Is that the sign of a mature statesman? Not to me.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

Goodness, no wonder Gov. Palin’s favorability ratings have been steadily tanking ever since the Convention. What a case of the emperor’s new clothes!

Posted by: Pacific moderate | September 22, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Well, maybe if you buggers in the fourth estate weren’t campaigning for Obama maybe other candidates would talk to you. But why should McCain or Palin talk to you guys? So you can try to embarass them while ignoring every question about Obama? What’s the point of spending time talking to you, your minds are made up and you’ve decided the election is over.
Palin drew 60,000 at a rally in Florida but try to find a press report that speaks in anything even remotely the same terms as “Obama went to the bathroom this morning, it was a world class event.”

Posted by: John Steele | September 22, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Why should she talk to you?? You’ve done nothing but ridicule and denegrate the poor woman. If I were in her shoes, I wouldn’t talk to you either.
You idiots in the mainstream media are fast becoming a non-entity to people like me (Thank God). You’re so far in the tank for Obama you practically drool in his presence. It’s a disgrace.

Posted by: SueM | September 22, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

ABC give it a break.
Obama has been off limits to questions.
And, honestly, after what Charlie Gibson did who can they trust to do a fair and balanced interview?????? NOT ABC or NBC.
I know Katie Couric has an interview coming up, and I honestly would not have done that if I was McCain’s campaign.
Horrible, dishonest coverage – why would Sarah give the media and press the time of day – they will just crucify her the way Gibson did.
Gibson looked like a fool – it did not go unnoticed.

Posted by: jlp | September 22, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

“You wait patiently for the debates instead of settling for biased questioning by liberal hack journalists.”
So 1 very structured debate in which only the moderator will be allowed to ask question equals vetting?
Do you really consider asking about the predominant foreign policy change of the last 15 years (aka the Bush doctrine) is somehow out of bounds for a VP candidate?
I am pleased with the debate setup for the Presidential debates (subject & format).
All this could be alleviated by her (& him) taking some questions from the press or even the public.
McCain promised weekly press conferences & a q&a session in Congress alah British Parliment.
Why should anyone believe him given his behavior during the campaign?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

So why do reporters stay on the road with her? All she does it give the same telepromptered speech over and over. If the media were to pack up and leave, stop covering her, the McCain camp would be forced to react. Stop enabling them!

Posted by: CJ | September 22, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

“they will just crucify her the way Gibson did.”
Crucified her?
LOL.
Gibson did everything he could to help clueless along. Even feeding her into her pre-prepared scripted answers.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

The MSM’s treatment of Sarah and McCain has been horrendous. Absolutely obscene.
And you think they should go out of their way to meet with you? Why? So you can edit their quotes, like ABC? So you can pose “gotcha” questions?
Why don’t you go cover some of the Obama scandals? There are plenty for you to take a look at. But NO, you won’t do that.
If you did to my daughter what you have done to Sarah Palin you wouldn’t get out of the hospital for six months. And if you did, you would be right back in.
__________

Posted by: RJGatorEsq. | September 22, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

I think after the election McCain as POTUS should force the licenses of ABC, CBS and NBC to be auctioned off to organizations that are not politically motivated but care about the country and integrity. The current MSM might as well be working for the Obama campaign. I never watch Fox before this summer. But I have to tell you they are more balanced then all the networks put together.

Posted by: John Smith | September 22, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

You haven’t earned access and she’s speaking directly to the American people. The only thing we need from you guys at this point is to turn on the camera and shut up. Now go back to your Tasergate, Trig-gate, Bookgate, AIP-gate. trip to Iraq-gate nonsense. You know, the issues that matter to embittered, hostile, hypocritical liberals everywhere.

Posted by: w3bgrrl | September 22, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

What the MSM doesn’t seem to understand is that we don’t need them to know who our candidates are, we can look at their actual voting records and their history in public office. we don’t need to get our news from them.
We will listen to them speak, we will hear the answers directly from their own mouths without the media hearsay, and if their record is one of moral and fiscal reform and accountability and lines up with their own words then we will see it…if it is one of contradiction and manipulation we will see that.
We don’t need to hear a reporters spin/opinion on an issue and we don’t want to hear a reporters spin/opinion on any issue. We want information that is non-partisan. If we wanted an opinion we will listen to and watch programs that are more in line with our own.
If the MSM wants more viewers and better ratings…they will stop playing for the left and start asking the exact same questions of every single candidate running for office, with no zeal or excitement displayed for one over another.
It’s a thing called integrity, of which the MSM has lost all understanding.
And when it comes to Sarah and McCain…we actually trust them to do what is right because of who they are.
We Conservatives/Reps respect honesty, integrity, personal accountability and humility, why does the modern MSM think we would listen to them?
It’s baffling.

Posted by: martin | September 22, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Hmmmmm…..Did you forget to watch Palin being interviewed on TV?…it was on your channel, ABC.
Never has your interviewer ever asked Obama or Biden the same type of questions as ABC did of Palin.
The press is just looking to ask snarky, “gotcha’” questions to Palin so as to provide more “we hate Palin/we hate McCain” fodder for the liberal blogs (this one included).
There is no longer an objective, balanced press in America, but rather the media is a set of fan clubs of the Democrats (in coordination with the Democrats – a Democrat running for Senator wrote an anti-Palin skit that ran on NBC last Saturday!).
Imagine how low in the polls Obama would be if it weren’t for the 24/7 adulation of Obama and attacks on McCain & Palin by the media.

Posted by: Zank | September 22, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

ABC to Palin: “Why don’t you do more media interviews?” (subtext) “so we can misquote you, cut and paste your answers, make it seem like you’re answering the wrong question, throw your thoughtful answers on the cutting-room floor, and make you look like a fanatic?”
Palin to ABC: “Maybe I’ll speak directly to the American people, so they know everything about me!”

Posted by: Steve Z | September 22, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Jake,
You are probably the most fair reporter out there. The rest are in the tank for Obama as you very well know.
In this unfair media environment there is no reason for McCain and Palin to give press conferences.
AP and NY Times and their friends are waiting to twist anything they would say.

Posted by: SRK | September 22, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

The Palin phenomenon as
Republicans have been
marketing her appearance
on the national scene has
been coming under increasing
scrutiny.
The verdict is in.
The Arctic Empress is wearing
no clothes.

Posted by: anon | September 22, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

“Early on in this campaign, before McCain began his media avoidance strategy, the McCain campaign would muse aloud about how relatively inaccessible Sen. Barack Obama was. ”
Obama didn’t seem to suffer in the polls at all for hiding from the media.
If Palin can draw huge crowds even while avoiding the media, why shouldn’t she? All the people complaining have already decided she’s incompotent anyway. The only thing that could be gained from more interviews is more chances for partisan Obama-backing reporters to launch gotcha questions at her. Who’s she going to win over doing more interviews? Joe Klein? Richard Cohen? The NYT editorial board? You, Jake Tapper? Not gonna happen.

Posted by: wht32 | September 22, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

America’s turned out to be the laughing stock of the entire world. You go to war with a country that didn’t attack you “for the sake of democracy” and look at the state of the democracy you morons are peddling. Voter caging, personal smears and attacks, the media wants to vet Palin and they are doing a disservice to America and are ‘in the tank’ for Obama. Bush asks you to suck on a trillion dollars to bail out his corporate buddies, a socialist concept made real by a republican administration, then turn around and labal Obama the socialist. Once again a Republican president has but you all in such debt that–surprise, surprise!!–it looks like it may be too costly to initiate a universal health care plan. Osama Bin Laden and his terrorists buddies are laughing away in their caves as America self destructs to the chants of “America first” as ‘real Americans’ rob you of 700 billion dollars while looking you dead in your eye and telling you their going to do it. I doubt Americans have any idea how truly stupid they look.

Posted by: Mike | September 22, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Jake-
Watching you complain after Charlie Gibson hatcheted Palin, under the guise of an interview, is rich.
Charlie suggested that she displayed hubris by accepting McCain’s offer, when, in fact, 4 out of the last 5 Presidents have been Governors.
For that matter, it has been 1960 (48 years) since a sitting Senator has been elected President.
Earlier the same week George Stephanopolous helped Obama’s errant slip about his “Muslim faith” by correcting him.
The more your network, CNN, WaPo, NYT and NBC try to throw the election for Obama, the more irrelevant and obscure you get.

Posted by: Molonlabe28 | September 22, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

so you are the barometer of ability to lead. Get real. Get a job in journalism. What ever became of your last female role model, Cingy Sheehan?

Posted by: Moby | September 22, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

The problem with leftist snobs like 99% of the media is that they think the only people who can lead this country is leftist snob like themselves. How wrong they are.

Posted by: Alan Poole | September 22, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

“So 1 very structured debate in which only the moderator will be allowed to ask question equals vetting?” Yes. It beats numerous edited interviews by a liberal media.
“Do you really consider asking about the predominant foreign policy change of the last 15 years (aka the Bush doctrine) is somehow out of bounds for a VP candidate?” No, and its not out of bounds for a PRESIDENTIAL candidate either.
“McCain promised weekly press conferences & a q&a session in Congress alah British Parliment.” Do you really want to bring up promises that were made by the candidates? Didn’t Obama promise to take public financing? How many town hall offers did Obama refuse?

Posted by: Linda | September 22, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

When you’re good, you’re a revelation, Jake. But when you’re bad, you’re just an idiot.
Palin is the single most wretchedly, offensively overexposed politician in my lifetime. If she is taking a well-deserved moment out of the limelight, before once again being plunged into the flamewar of liberal Democrat hate and lies, then God bless her for that.

Posted by: Jaibones | September 22, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Feel free to stop being completely biased FOR Obama, and I will imagine they will treat you with respect. Continue to treat them with Contempt, and maybe they will win without you, and you will be completely eviscerated and your entire media base will collapse.

Posted by: A Stoner | September 22, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Where’s Sarah?
Sarah was on ABC news 10 days ago. Gave you the number one rating for the week. ABC hasn’t seen first place since May. You can thank boring ole Sarah!
She bumped chronic #2 Hannity and Colmes over O’Reilly by a million.
You just want her to boost your ratings.

Posted by: Corky Boyd | September 22, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

So Jake says that McCain/Palin should take interviews from the press whenever the Press wants them to. yet I look at the top of Jake’s Blog and there is an ad for Barack Obama for President. Bias? You make the call. Ny the way, McCain was on 60 minutes last night and Palin speaks with Couric this week. I would consider a vote for Obama if he answered some tough questions. Obama follows the readings of Saul Alinksi, I read some his Marxist ideals in college. Saul says to lie to the public and do whatever necessary to get elected and then run roughshod over them once you’re in office. Obama wants to raise our taxes and then he lies about Social Security to the Senior Citizens. Most retired folks will hurt if the Cap Gains tax is raised back to 35%. Time to answer some tough questions Barack. Speak the truth! Please!

Posted by: Atlanta Media Guy | September 22, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

The mainstream media being boycotted – I love it. Maybe this will teach you to actually practice the neutrality you preach. The Charlie Gibson interview was sneering, condescending, and the editing was so cut-and-pasted it looked like a kidnapper’s note.
Your blatant Obama cheerleading has cost you the little credibility you had left. But I don’t think you’re going to be able to carry the rapidly-dying corpse of his campaign over the finish line. You’ll have spent all of your credibility and relevance for nothing.

Posted by: Jim Schuler | September 22, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

The way that the media has gone into the tank regarding Obama gives me the heebie jeebies.
Palin’s interview showed me that she can handle those heebie jeebies. She’s smart.

Posted by: Larry | September 22, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

LOL….that’s what you offer linda?
A GOP plant in the audience that condemns the media?
LOL!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Republicans will vote for
the Republican ticket no
matter whether the
candidates are good for
the country or not.
You can’t find anyone worse
than Songbird McCain. The
Rpeublicans will still vote
for him.

Posted by: anon | September 22, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

I wouldn’t give the press interviews either, Gibson was rude and cut up her answers so that she came across badly. We the people see thru all of your bias and I no longer watch your news and only get information via internet. Hopefully bad ratings and losing money will teach ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN,and the worst MSNBC a lesson. The only channel that is fair is Fox and thats the only channel I watch.

Posted by: Linda | September 22, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

The media is in a tizzy because they are not being allowed to play kingmaker. Given the explicit Obama bias by mainstream media, should anyone be surprised that they should not be the arbitrator in who is prepare or not?

Posted by: Mike | September 22, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

“the way campaign officials have protected her from her press corps does not necessarily suggest that they hold her ability to handle such a routine event — a press conference — in high regard.”
Actually, I think it suggests that campaign officials don’t necessarily hold THE PRESS in high regard, which is fine by me.

Posted by: Robert | September 22, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

“Gibson was rude”
How was he rude?
“cut up her answers so that she came across badly”
How so?
Her answers seemed as fluid as her speechs.
Granted they are soundbites that say little of substance.
But how did they make her come across badly?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“The only channel that is fair is Fox and thats the only channel I watch.”
Not surprising.
Studies have shown that FoxNews viewers who watch only FoxNews are 4 times as likely (as compared to other cable news watchers) to believe things that are not true.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Can you say “cost reductions” at ABC?

Posted by: jim | September 22, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Governor Sarah Palin continues to speak to the ones who really matter in this campaign, the American voters. The press can continue to polish their Obama pins and put out their myopic articles and commentary, but I’m not buying any of it anymore. I am so sick of their mean spirited attacks and liberal bias on Governor Palin and her family. The press has blown what little credibility they had. The fourth estate is dead. We are on our own to get to the truth about Obama, since you won’t even pretend to look into his associates and mentors.

Posted by: Fallon | September 22, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Atlanta Media Guy -
If you’re going to talk about Saul Alinsky, please 1) spell his name correctly and 2) refrain from calling him a “Marxist.” This sort of name calling makes me wonder if we’re on the verge of a new McCarthy/HUAC Era.
Alinsky was one of those dreaded “community organizers” who believed in economic justice and helped people of all races and religions in ecomomically devastated Chicago areas like Back of the Yards and Woodlawn.
It would have been surprising had Obama not studied his principles and techniques while he organized unemployed steel workers on the South Side of Chicago.
Generations of community organizers and not-for-profit groups have relied on Alinsky’s books to help improve the lives and communities of ordinary working folks. I’m sure the have-nots wish they could afford to hire lobbyists. They have community organizers instead.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 22, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Believe it or not, in this
21st century, there is a
governor of a state in these
United States who flatly
says that global warming
is not man-made.
That governor is Sarah Palin
now pretending to be ready
for the office of VPOTUS and
potentially POTUS.

Posted by: anon | September 22, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Why shouldn’t she avoid the media? The more she stays away the more attention she gets. Her name is a household word and the more trashing of her everyone does the more people love her. Besides, everyone (democrats and republicans alike) knows full well that the hidden agenda is to smear her and trip her up to fail just like good old Charlie tried with his rediculous Bush Doctrine question which he butchered and ended up making her look smarter than him. The fool.
Keep BO out of the white house.
MCCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: tmacioszek | September 22, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Well Steve Schmidt is in full meltdown mode today screaming at the NYT.
It appears he is upset that NYT has the audacity to point out Rick Davis’s lobbying efforts for Fannie Mae.
I mean how dare they point that out and ruin the McCain guilt by association attack on Obama.
Even the press is tired of the McCain campaign’s steady stream of lies.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Sarah Palin talking to the MSM crowd
would be sort of like Obama’s desire to chat with crazies like Ahmadinejad &
Chavez without preconditions. The difference is Sarah is intelligent enough to recognize enemies while Obama
is merely a fool. Sarah has no need to
expose herself to the supposedly objective reporters who are in fact water carriers for the Obama campaign.

Posted by: paulejb | September 22, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

We trust Sarah – we don’t trust the press.
Maybe if the gotcha journalism was reduced, the agenda journalism was exchanged for true news gathering and there was a true desire to uncover the issues on BOTH sides of the debate, John and Sarah could/would be more available to the press.

Posted by: denise | September 22, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

hey anon – yes it is the21st century and there are alot of Americans who don’t believe that global warming is man-made.

Posted by: linda | September 22, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

hey anon – yes it is the21st century and there are alot of Americans who don’t believe that global warming is man-made.

Posted by: linda | September 22, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

I have not watched msm for years now. I am so sick and tired of them. Why can’t we use their reports as a campaign contribution to obamassiah?
Maybe you don’t know that it was not McCain who said there were 60,000 people there, but the fire chief. I understand that they are having the “great 0″ take his teleprompters with him every where he goes, because as soon as he gets off his written talk, he says things like lipstick on a pig.
I will never understand why we would want someone whose character is so shallow that he associates with the dregs of criminal activity and anti-American screeders (I know not a word).
All you lefties, including the press, there are lots of left countries that you could inhabit and love, this is the only one with a constitution of freedom and personal liberty. Go find your own.

Posted by: Kitten | September 22, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

With NBC accusing the Palin family and letting Al Franken write a hit piece on John McCain, ABC conducting an interview like it was an inquisition and then editing it beyond recognition and lying about quotes from Palin such as leaving off “let us pray” and the Washington Post goint so far as to say McCain was “wildly exagerating” when all McCain did was quote the Washington Post, I can see why she doesn’t trust you guys. You have a good audience in the Obama/Daily KOS campaign though.

Posted by: robtr | September 22, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Global Warming in NOT man-made. The Globe is warmed by the sun, not man. Thankfully, not all politicians are idiots.

Posted by: WakeUp | September 22, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

uh … I think she sat with Charlie Gibson for a couple of nights during which he asked her tougher questions then he has ever asked 0bama. The woman is too smart by half for the media. After she is elected VP in November, the whole lot of the “main street media” is going to rue the day that they were such water carriers for 0bama that they didn’t treat this woman with the courtesy and respect that she deserved. Who will be laughing then?

Posted by: beebop | September 22, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

******* Not only is global warming Not man made, it’s not even happening!! A report by a UN climate scientist came out a month ago and said:” The world is in a cooling trend”

Posted by: ynot | September 22, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“and there are alot of Americans who don’t believe that global warming is man-made.”
Yes we call them ignorant right wingers who cling to pseudo science fed to them by their respective propaganda outlets.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“I think she sat with Charlie Gibson for a couple of nights during which he asked her tougher questions then he has ever asked 0bama.”
Which question was tough?
“After she is elected VP in November, the whole lot of the “main street media” is going to rue the day that they were such water carriers for 0bama that they didn’t treat this woman with the courtesy and respect that she deserved. Who will be laughing then?”
So once in power Palin will have venegance on the media?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

McCain doesn’t seem to have any trouble talking to the people.

Posted by: linda | September 22, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Yeah, I guess you guys weren’t listening when she gave her acceptance speech…she’s not going to get into the good graces of the media.
I can’t really recall anyone ever anointing Jake Tapper and his liberal “journalist” colleagues as the final authorities on whether Sarah is qualified.
Hey, nice job you liberals in the media have done investigating Obama’s Chicago Machine ties and Biden’s family lobbying manners. Oh, wait. That happened in another dimension.

Posted by: Bob | September 22, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

WhoisReally2Blame, I think Dodd, Schumer and Barney Frank are going to be visiting Rangel at his beachside home in Punta Cana for an extended vacation soon. LOL!

Posted by: linda | September 22, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

“John McCain, co-sponsor of bill to reign in Freddie/Fannie monster in 2005. The Dems would have none of it”
The GOP ran Congress and the committee that was intro to in both 2005 & 2006.
So how did the Dems stop this bill?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Oh, boo-hoo.
Is that mean Sarah not playing nice with the ‘media’ ? How dare she ? Does she not know how (self) important you all are ?
I see no reason why she or anyone else should ever talk to the ‘media’. About anything.
Ever.
Many of us(and I mean MANY, and FAR more than even a few years ago) can’t stand the ‘media’, and don’t believe ANYTHING it says. Frankly the sooner the media propaganda machines fade away the better for all. I can’t wait to be perfectly frank.
We don’t care that she does not bow down to your demands. In fact it is as they say — a ‘feature’ not a ‘big’.
A BIG FEATURE if truth be told.

Posted by: dougf | September 22, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Okay Jake, I’ll bite. But why don’t you tell me where Senator Joseph Biden is now? When was the last nationally televised interview he did? Juxtapose that to Sarah Palin. When will Sen. Biden & Obama provide another nationally televised interview? When will Sarah?
No, Jake, I’ll ask when will Sen. Biden sit down with Charlie Gibson or let him hang out with him with unfettered access for 3 days? Jake, as a member of the media, you realize that stating an idea over and over again makes it akin to the truth. However, factually speaking, you lack facts babe.

Posted by: Terri Owens | September 22, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

Ryan C. – we just call people who believe global warming is man made “People who have made Al Gore a millionaire.”

Posted by: Linda | September 22, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Speaking of Al Gore, does he have allergies or something? He’s blown up like a balloon.

Posted by: tmacioszek | September 22, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

I’ve been following Govs. Sarah Palin and Bobby Jindal, the two rising stars of GOP, since 2007. Had MSM done proper homework, you wouldn’t be “caught off guard” by Sen. McCain’s choice of Gov. Palin as his VP pick.
Now you all want her to make your job easy for you. Gee…and you wonder why you have no credibility left.

Posted by: Mineko | September 22, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“How the Democrats Created the Financial Crisis: Kevin Hassett”
But the bill didn’t become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn’t even get the Senate to vote on the matter.

Posted by: WhoisReally2Blame | September 22, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“Okay Jake, I’ll bite. But why don’t you tell me where Senator Joseph Biden is now? When was the last nationally televised interview he did? Juxtapose that to Sarah Palin. When will Sen. Biden & Obama provide another nationally televised interview? When will Sarah?”
Biden has been interviewed nationally and locally more than 80 times since he was announced as VP including every cable morn show, Sunday morn news & 60 minutes.
Palin was interviewed by People magazine, Charlie Gibson and a lovestruck Sean Hannity.
How that for juxtaposition?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Ignoring the media is precisely the right strategy for Republicans. The rule should be – do nothing to legitimize the press as neutral arbiters of news and events.
They should follow through at the debates and insist that Obama pick two questioners and they pick two. That way Obama will have to answer a question from someone other than some fawning left-wing “journalist”.
The faster the major newspapers and the network “news” media fold the better for the country.

Posted by: Art | September 22, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

From the WaPo editorial quoted here: “McCain’s selection of an inexperienced and relatively unknown figure was unsettling, and the campaign’s decision to keep her sequestered from serious interchanges with reporters and voters serves only to deepen the unease.”
The exact same thing could be said about the Democratic Party selecting Barack Uh-uh-uh-bama.

Posted by: ynot4tony2 | September 22, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

“But the bill didn’t become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee”
I love when right wingers offer op-ed by McCain advisers and pretend that’s its somehow detached non partisan analysis.
Of course the writer doesn’t tell you that bill was only read to the Banking committee (which the GOP controlled) before being presented to the Senate (which the GOP also controlled).
You want blame for why that bill did not receive even a vote?
Talk to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist in between indictments for corruption.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Boo hoo hoo. Sarah won’t play with the media. I think it’s great! Reason enough for me to vote for her and her outstanding running mate and remember, my vote cancels out y’alls vote!

Posted by: Mike P | September 22, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

who cares about the alphabet media, WaPO or NYT? Sarah Palin should talk to voters, answer their questions..have townhall meetings, have people phone in..the media is out to get her, if the media is fair, she should participate. But the media is so in the tank for the One it is downright a disgrace. Just what kind of foreign policy experience John Edwards had in 2004? How about Bill Clinton in 1992? What about the Messiah himself? Anyone cares about what he actually accomplished when he was the community organizer, the state senator and the senator? McCain and Palin should ignore the media, and if they win the election, shut their doors for the junkyard dogs from WaPo and NYT, esp the NYT crowd. Seriously, these folks from the NYT are no better than the D&D pajama crowd from DailyKos, want to play AD&D, get these people, for real news, go somewhere else..

Posted by: Alison | September 22, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

“Steve Schmidt complained that the Gray Lady and other news organizations hadn’t sufficiently scrutinized Barack Obama and Joe Biden, seizing on the ties of Biden’s son, Hunter, to the credit card industry as a prime example.
To illuminate that connection, RNC communications director Danny Diaz sent out to reporters just now a piece he said “clearly states [Hunter Biden's] work for MBNA.”
The story Republicans are hanging their hat on?
You guessed it, published in The New York Times on Sept. 13. “

Posted by: GOP thinskswe're stupid | September 22, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

60,000 people on a Sunday afternoon…hardly a peep about that.
While the msm has been picking up stories planted by astroturfing Axlerod, Governor Palin as been engaging with crowds of people, endearing herself and her family to them.
She doesn’t need you, msm. In fact, you’ve behaved as her enemy, not objective journalists. It’s time you considered yourself exposed, and therefore irrelevant.

Posted by: RJ | September 22, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

“60,000 people on a Sunday afternoon…hardly a peep about that.”
Probably because like most things coming out of the McCain campaign including inflation of crowds, that one was not true.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 22, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Jake, Glad to see this posted. It is a question we should all be asking and the people who respond as if this were whining should stop and think for a moment: Would you hire someone to work in your own company who you had not confirmed was qualified for the job? If not, why would you want someone in the top office of the country who has yet to prove that she is anywhere near qualified? Besides, she claims she’s a self-described “pitbull” who can handle anything so let’s see her handle the press for starters.

Posted by: Laura | September 22, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

Why is the Arctic Empress
hiding from the media?
The Empress has no clothes!

Posted by: anon | September 22, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

The MSM is nobody’s friend…The problem is that voter’s get the impression that the campaign is afraid that she’ll make a mistake…Beyond that, there really ARE questions that go beyond the Sean Hannity softballs…1. Followup about this Trooper nonsense…2.Followup on her family’s involvement with a party that would consider cessession from the US…3. Follow-up on several questionable assertions that SHE made which bring her credibility into question…I’m sure that many of the big issue questions will be explored in the debate. The questions that require answers are these fringe issues…McCain’s campaign makes an intelligent politician look like – a Beauty Queen.

Posted by: TruthHurts | September 22, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Jake, I’m glad to see this posted. Those who are whining should remember that this woman compared herself to a pitbull–a remark that’s been endlessly repeated. So if she’s that tough she shouldn’t be shrinking from media interviews. I thought she did poorly in the interview with Charlie Gibson and that’s all we’ve seen. If she can’t handle step one of running for office, what is she going to do when facing the Washington press corps and avoidance isn’t an option?

Posted by: Laura | September 22, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

For those of you who see these news stories as a chance to attack Obama, why don’t you just focus on the issue–Palin. Is it really your opinion that a VP candidate does not need to talk to the press, answer questions from the American people and generally be accountable for her record? Is paranoia about the media so deep that you don’t think anyone in the media can ask a fair question? Can you really be satisfied that she has met the requirements of office with the amount of information you have at hand? If the answers to these questions if “yes” that’s scary enough but of course it is really the judgment of McCain that is in question here as well–picking someone who he has to hide from the public and who still remains an unknown in the political arena. The thought of having a candidate one beat away from the presidency who has yet to respond openly to her public may be the single best reason to reject her.

Posted by: perumal11 | September 22, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

The big loser this November will be the MSM, Americans across the country have been looking at the political tripe and personal attacks served up by ABC, CBS, NBC and CNN on the GOP ticket. It looks like the public is making their voices heard via the Nielsen ratings….how did those ABC Emmys do last night?…the worst ratings in the history of the program and it’s been telecast for over forty years?

Posted by: Lank | September 22, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

The media is a laughingstock. Here’s a guy all lathered up about access to one of the Vice Presidential Candidates (How many calls has Tapper made to Joe Biden for an interview?) while the Democratic Presidential nominee’s toughest question from ABC to date is which flavor of ice cream he prefers.
I understand there was over 14 million+ dollars in charitable funds guided by Mr. Obama in Chicago that oddly have not been accounted for. Where is the media scream and cry to find out what happened to the money in Obama’s trust during what appears to be his only experience handling money?
It appears there is no shame with Mr. Tapper or many of his counterparts at ABC. Who will be the first responsible news organization in America to demand to know what became of the money under Obama’s supervision as Director of the Woods Fund?

Posted by: Kurt | September 22, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I can see the moon from my house, perhaps I am qualified to be an astronaut. All the people along the borders of every country who are not blind but can actually see across the border are now qualified to be VP. It is not a disgrace to be educated, to have studied hard, to get letters behind our name, letters that stand for something. There is nothing wrong with being educated and perhaps knowing the meaning of the word “doctrine”. I thought everyone in school had to learn history of their country, this is not an elitist prerogative but a duty. Ms Palin should know what the Bush doctrine is as well as the doctrines of the past Presidents. This is high school stuff. Once more people it is not a sin or against “family values” to be educated and then apply that education to the service of your country, like being VP or being President. What we have here is the dumbing down of America and people are proud of it. Look across that border and learn another language! Glorifying ignorance will not get us anywhere. Try some humility for a change!

Posted by: truthsayer5 | September 22, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

WaPo: [McCain] is not entitled to keep the public from being able to make an informed assessment of that judgment.
Problem is, since all of the MSM reporters are panning for mud in Alaska and none asking any inconvenient questions (Rezko? Ayers? Wright?) of Obama, the public is being robbed of the ability to make an informed assessment.

Posted by: Paul in NJ | September 22, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Jake snarks: “Early on in this campaign, before McCain began his media avoidance strategy, the McCain campaign would muse aloud about how relatively inaccessible Sen. Barack Obama was. Why was he afraid of answering questions? they would ask. Weren’t we in the press corps insulted?”
Obama is again ‘relatively inaccessible’ – he won’t address reporters without leaning on a TelePromptR – but you lot aren’t insulted, or apparently even interested. It’s all Palin-bashing, all the time.

Posted by: Paul in NJ | September 22, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

I see no reason for the McCain campaign to brief representatives from the Obama campaign (i.e. what you call “the media”) in the middle of an election.
The public is best served by the approach they are taking – go direct to the people and skip right over the media priesthood.
Worked for Reagan.

Posted by: Vern | September 22, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

I think the McCain Palin team is doing the right thing. When McCain opened up his campaign he was not able to stay on message. Obama’s lack of transparency had him in the lead. If that is what America wants then that is what they get.
McCain/Palin rock!!

Posted by: mark | September 22, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm

Jake,
the objection as I understand you is that Palin is not running through the media gauntlet that is designed to destroy her? The Ossiah goes on O’Reilly and gets an interview that was designed to portray Bill as a moderate rather than vet Barrack. Otherwise, the media is adoring.
I am still waiting for a investigation into ACORN and the Chicago machine. The scale of intensity is not equal. I am wondering how the Dems would feel if the media voted 9-1 Republican?

Posted by: locus ceruleus | September 22, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

She sure isn’t keeping herself sequestered from voters – she’s out there everyday and they love her.
On economic, foreign policy and social issues her beliefs and policy ideas are in line with the core values that have made this country great. Her record shows she has the backbone, intelligence and political skills to get her policies enacted. I’d say she’s qualified.

Posted by: kevin | September 22, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

“I worry that when we need to know facts that we have a right to know, they will avoid communicating with us, too!!! Obama/Biden ’08!!!”
Good question, excellent observation!
Now pop quiz
Name 5 Bills/Legislation Obama has authored, fought for, and gotten passed?
Being 1 of 99 Co-Sponsors on a bill on a bill doesn’t count.
The Bills/ Legislation have to have a name or number that can be checked and verified.
Example:
McCain/Feingold, McCain/Lieberman, McCain/Kennedy
I don’t care if you agree or disagree with the bills,
I’m just trying to find out if this guy ever showed up for work!
Public law (xxx-xxxx) SB (senate bill) and such.
WE know a lot about Palin’s 20 months of Gov so far.
Over the same time space, 20 months, I can’t find a single thing this guy did.
To make it easier pick ANY 20 month segment that Obama was a State or Federal Senator, you can even use a segment that covers 20 month’s State through Federal.
If you can’t come up with some why would you vote for this guy?

Posted by: Injest | September 22, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Where’s Sarah?? From todays’ Washington Post:
In addition to having private sessions with Afghan president Hamid Karzai and Colombian president Alvaro Uribe scheduled for Tuesday, the Alaska governor now has a more elaborate list of heads of state lined up for Wednesday.
According to the campaign, she will meet Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili; Ukrainian President Victor Yushchenko; Iraqi President Jalal Talabani; Pakistani President Asif Ali Zadari; and Indian Prime Minister Manhoman Singh in a single day.
So, let’s see– she’s done the Gibson interview and Hannity this past week, as well as campaigning. Sorry if she doesn’t have time right now for you, sir but after the disdainful way the media has treated her, I don’t blame her for keeping her distance. Maybe try some decency and respect for her & her family, and see if that gets you an interview or press conference.

Posted by: Deb | September 22, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Benjamin9
“I believe she has appeared before more folks than Biden.
Whats the deal w/Biden?”
Opps sorry Benjamin9, apparently you didn’t get the memo.
It’s currently a 3 way race for VP.
Obama’s running against Palin for VP, and in a distant 3rd is Biden (ya know he takes the train home almost every night” Biden.

Posted by: Injest | September 22, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Jake you are making the same mistake others have made. If you went to school in the U.S. you know all you need is to be 35 years old and a natural born citizen. nothing about a passport or talking to the MSM. Sorry Jake but you are looking down your nose again at the American people.

Posted by: JOHN TICE | September 22, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

yes the Empress as no clothes, but it is the cheering crowd that keeps her fooled until some small child will speak up, then the crowd will jeer; but what does this say about the crowd? It is to McCain’s'discredit that he foisted someone as poorly qualified as Palin on us, and it is a terrible insult to us that he should do so. Do we not deserve better? Ms Palin isn’t to be vilified for not being qualified, she is what she is, but she should have known better than to have accepted his invitation. With grace she could have said thanks but no thanks, like she did for the bridge to nowhere. However McCain took the spotlight off himself and his family and sacrificed Palin instead. This is a war hero!

Posted by: truthsayer5 | September 22, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

This guy is a ABC News’ Senior National Correspondent? Man they throw around titles. Cracks me up…
I can’t wait to read the analysis on why Obama didn’t win the election. They should start writing them now, so it’s fresh in their memory.
If you work in MSM, I would suggest spending some time NOW with your resume, as more lay-offs after this election will surely come. People are just tired of the bias…

Posted by: GingerGuy | September 22, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

With a 80% favor rating overall, (75% with dems) Gov. doesn’t need to bow down to the MSM, and if they weren’t listening, said she wasn’t going to seek their approval. MSM S/b DSM (downstream media). This lady too savvy to step in it, not like B.O. who seems to walk in it every day. The people who want to vote for her want to see her in person, not on the boob tube.

Posted by: Whiterock | September 22, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

I have learned so much during this election cycle.
1) I must be half as rich as John McCain as we have six vehicles.
2) Running for POTUS gives you the experience to be President (AC 360 interview).
3) Charlie Gibson is only cheerful interviewing Democrats.
4) Voters who are Democrats and do not vote for Obama are racists.
5) It is possible to attend a church for twenty years and be totally clueless
6) The ladies of The View were not ladies when they had the McCains as guests.
7) The MSM picks and chooses what appears in their newscasts with a bias that is unbelieveable.
8) Service to our country is less important than lipservice to a teleprompter.
9) If I am a woman and I vote for McCain-Palin, I must not be educated. (I guess I’ll send my undergraduate and graduate degrees back to UNC-CH and NCSU and request a refund.
10) There is a world beyond the beltway and the “Big City, and it is called middle America. Many of us could care less what some overpaid celebrity thinks.

Posted by: Glenda | September 22, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

my parents live down in the villages and i will tell you there are no minorities at the villages. my parents think palin is great. my mom said she thought palin was smarter than alot of people, i asked her if she is smart enough she just said that obama is scary. ok my parents are racist, but palin needs to speak to the media. it is unbelievable that the woman in this country don’t get mad that the media treats a woman differently than a man. there is no way a man gets away with what palin does. it is a shame that america gives a white woman a free pass but obama’s wife get’s question after question about her patriotism and the media ask’s if michelle is angry. i can’t believe this country.

Posted by: william | September 22, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

This is nothing new, Bush did it in the last two elections, mostly appearing at events with carefully vetted Republican supporters. Sad but true.

Posted by: Jim | September 22, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Considering that Charles Gibson, supposedly one of the best and most impartial reporters out there, couldn’t manage to get his “exact quote” right, even though the video is readily available, and essentially acted as if his job was to trip up this woman who had the audacity to think she could hold her own with her betters, I’m not surprised.
The reason Sarah Palin should avoid the MSM is as follows: she’s not going to get anything close to a fair hearing.
The evidence?
Elaine Povich reports that only seven percent of all Washington correspondents voted for George H.W. Bush in 1992.
David Brooks notes that for every journalist who contributed to George
W. Bush’s campaign, another 93 contributed to Kerry’s campaign.
Finally, Groseclose and Milyo from UCLA find a systematic liberal bias of the U.S. media. “This is echoed by three other studies— Hamilton [2004], Lott and Hassett [2004], and Sutter [2004].”
You want people to talk to you? Then stop slanting your reporting.

Posted by: orthodoc | September 22, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

About global warming, Palin
is blissfully ignorant.
On war and peace, her view
is that men don’t start wars.
Her god ordained the invasion
of Iraq. We just carry out
his tasks.
On NATO expansion, she echoes
Bush and McCain. That means
her god could be ordaining
wars in Georgia and Ukraine
for his own recreation and
pleasure. We are pawns in
his grand cosmic scheme.
She’s a crazy mixture of
religion and politics like
some wacky pastors.

Posted by: anon | September 22, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Ok Ryan, I’ll pretend you really want answers and play along.
“Gibson was rude”
How was he rude?
Simply put, aside from the attitude (and you’d need to watch the videos for that) the “Exact Words” gotcha was impolite at best; and at worst it was unintelligible as his “exact words” quote was incorrect.
“cut up her answers so that she came across badly”
How so?
You didn’t read the transcript of the first night’s interview at Mark Levin’s webpage did you? Something like 70% of what Palin said got cut from the broadcast.
Most of her answers got cut from multiple sentences covering a topic were cut down to a sentence (or partial sentence) soundbite.
When you give me a 2 hour interview, and I cut you down to 5 minutes of soundbites; nobody would think I’d done your speech justice, or given you a fair platform; would they?
When you cut most of her answers, you’ve just shown you’re not interested in what she has to say. Gibson’s editors were obviously more interested in Gibson’s questions (only some that made him look foolish were cut) than Palin’s answers.
Heck, in some cases Palin’s answer to a cut follow-up question was aired as her answer to the original question.
Dishonest, hack-job, manipulative editing; these are all fair analysis of what ABC did to the Palin interview.
Somehow she doesn’t want to come back, have partial phrases edited from paragraphs and be misrepresented again?
How dare she not allow you to butcher her comments more? Doesn’t she know that ABC controls the truth?

Posted by: Gekkobear | September 22, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Joe Biden has done 85 or so interviews since he became Obama’s running mate. He’s been called a gaffe machine and yet, he keeps doing interviews.
Palin has done three and two of them were softballs (People and Hannity).
We get it.
Palin is scared of the media.
Of course Palin is drawing major crowds. Everyone wants to know what she stands for because there have been no interviews. When they get there they are treated to a nice speech delivered with the help of a teleprompter written by McCain’s campaign. I’m sure that inspires a lot of confidence. Sure. That’s why her ratings have plummeted.
We may end up with a President with a communications degree who believes the apocalypse is coming a wee bit too slowly and decides to give the world a little push.

Posted by: johnTX | September 22, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Finally, Groseclose and Milyo from UCLA find a systematic liberal bias of the U.S. media. “This is echoed by three other studies— Hamilton [2004], Lott and Hassett [2004], and Sutter [2004].”
You want people to talk to you? Then stop slanting your reporting.
********************************************** Just because journalists have an informed opinion does not mean they have biased reporting.
I have learned that conservatives seem to believe that the truth, served up with documented facts is a Liberal Bias.

Posted by: Truth Matters | September 22, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

whatever she says will be distorted and taken out of context. So why not speak directly at ralleys and have bloggers and cell recordings to listen to, when dealing with the media only use live open form venues. the Gibson chop/chop shop is proof/reason enough to avoid studio settings. In a way its back to good old fashioned campaining!

Posted by: SeanLA | September 22, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Sarah need to address the issues and stop hiding from them. Who cares where she shop or about her sending thank you notes to her girlfriends. Seems to me that she just want attention for anything other than responding to the concerns that are confronting the nation today. She seem to be the replica of Bush and McCain in her nonresponsive mode and it is unbelievable that some folks seem to be stuck in her world of doing and saying nothing about the economic, health care, education, etc. issues that must be addressed and dealt with.

Posted by: Debra | September 22, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm

The Liberal Media Whining that they do not get their chance to attack someone who dares to go against their Obama Messiah. How pathetic.
Good for you Governor Palin, let these partisan jackals sit on their hands while you talk to the people. The press in this Country has displayed an utter lack of objectivity and fairness in this campaign. They are proving to be left wing looneys, so stay the course and speak to the people yourself. No one else will let you speak in your own words except you.

Posted by: Don | September 23, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Common sense. A rally filled with cheering supporters as the candidate rereads a script is not the same as allowing oneself to be subjected to public scrutiny.
This woman could become President and leader of the free world, a place she knows virtually nothing about. We have a right to find out if she is as vacuous as her comments about Russia make her seem.
Even the courts honor the principle that witnesses should be subject to cross examination (hostile if the witness is deceptive) in order to search their knowledge and explore their truthfulness.
Today Sarah goes to the UN to make her first contact with world leaders, but guess what…nobody but nobody will be allowed to ask her what she learned! Nobody, not even Limbaugh. This display of avoidance shows that Palin, a communications major is simply afraid of speaking publicly and showing what she does and doesn’t know.
That’s just not good enough when voters have to choose a potential President.

Posted by: Schurdle | September 23, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Common sense. A rally filled with cheering supporters as the candidate rereads a script is not the same as allowing oneself to be subjected to public scrutiny.
This woman could become President and leader of the free world, a place she knows virtually nothing about. We have a right to find out if she is as vacuous as her comments about Russia make her seem.
Even the courts honor the principle that witnesses should be subject to cross examination (hostile if the witness is deceptive) in order to search their knowledge and explore their truthfulness.
Today Sarah goes to the UN to make her first contact with world leaders, but guess what…nobody but nobody will be allowed to ask her what she learned! Nobody, not even Limbaugh. This display of avoidance shows that Palin, a communications major is simply afraid of speaking publicly and showing what she does and doesn’t know.
That’s just not good enough when voters have to choose a potential President.

Posted by: Schurdle | September 23, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

People who respond, “Name me something Obama has done” in the comments under a blog crack me up.
It’s called Google. Try using it once in a while. At the very least you can check the Wikipedia page about him.
Sarcasm aside, reverse the party affiliations for a second. Would the people defending this no-media policy really have us believe that if Palin were a Democrat instead of a Republican that they wouldn’t be accusing her of ducking the tough questions?
If you think she is ducking, fine. If you don’t think she’s ducking, that’s fine, too. Just be consistent.
Ha. Consistency in an election race. I crack myself up.
“Whoever said the media has a uniform bias never saw three TV producers try to order a pizza.”

Posted by: Wikipedia | September 23, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

To the people who are cheering Palin on for ignoring the press, and to those who actually admit to voting for a candidate because she won’t talk to the media – how old are you? This isn’t a football game, this is an important election. This is a person who may be our next VP and possibly our next president. She needs to be available to the American people through the media. The press has thoroughly scrutinized every other candidate. Why should she get a free pass? Because she’s female? I’m starting to think that Palin’s cheerleaders don’t want her to speak for fear of what they might hear.

Posted by: Wheressarah | September 23, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

All of this back-and-forth about whether or not poor Sarah is justifiably avoiding being bullied by the media – who cares? People, it’s this simple: If someone is running for office, they are expected to answer legitimate questions posed by the media, so that the citizenry can make an informed decision when it is time to vote. This woman is attempting to claim the second highest office in the land. If she cannot handle the stress of responding to questions from the press now, what is the likelihood that she can handle the responsibilities of Vice President? And what does that say of her qualifications to step in as President, should the need arise? White/black, male/female, attractive/ghastly – none of this matters. Answer the people’s questions or please step down, Governor.

Posted by: BJ | September 23, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Why should he talk to a media that has been extremely bias? I think that he enjoys seeing the media squirm. He should find the most unbiased news sources and grant them media access. That way their ratings would soar and maybe the media would start being a little more fair. That would mean totally avoiding MSNBC, CNN, Washington Post and NY Times.
The less bias sources would include ABC News, USA Today, Fox News etc.

Posted by: nwkerr2005 | September 24, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Those calling for “end to media avoidance by Palin” are those trying to steal the election Obama using smears and misquotes and unfair “gottchas”.
Voters should teach those evil journalists a good lesson Nov 4.
Victory to McCain-Palin will clean up washington and also the “evil” anti-america media.

Posted by: Reuel | September 25, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

“That would mean totally avoiding MSNBC, CNN, Washington Post and NY Times.
The less bias sources would include ABC News, USA Today, Fox News etc.”
That is one of the funniest things I’ve read in ages. The only thing different with those news sources is that their “bias” agrees with yours. In particular, no sane person can utter the words “Fox News” and “unbiased” in the same sentence without having men in white coats appearing out of thin air to usher them to the nearest institution.

Posted by: Dubya | September 29, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.