By Ed O'Keefe

Sep 3, 2008 11:53pm

Mush!

Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin brought her rhetorical dogs over the finish line of the political Iditarod tonight, delivering a winner of an acceptance speech, despite whatever obstacles of doubt existed before tonight.

"It was just a year ago when all the experts in Washington counted out our nominee (Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.) because he refused to hedge his commitment to the security of the country he loves," she said, setting the stage for a "how-dare-you-you-media-snobs" address. "With their usual certitude, they told us that all was lost — there was no hope for this candidate who said that he would rather lose an election than see his country lose a war. But the pollsters and pundits overlooked just one thing when they wrote him off. They overlooked the caliber of the man himself — the determination, resolve, and sheer guts of Sen. John McCain. The voters knew better."

Palin talked movingly — and in a way, many women, and men, can certainly identify with — about her family. "Our son Track is 19," she said. "And one week from tomorrow — September 11th — he’ll deploy to Iraq with the Army infantry in the service of his country. My nephew Kasey also enlisted, and serves on a carrier in the Persian Gulf."

The speech, well crafted and largely written by former Bush White House speechwriter Matt Scully, was effective.

"I was mayor of my hometown," she said. "And since our opponents in this presidential election seem to look down on that experience, let me explain to them what the job involves."

"I guess a small-town mayor is sort of like a ‘community organizer,’ except that you have actual responsibilities," she said in a clear jab at Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., "I might add that, in small towns, we don’t quite know what to make of a candidate who lavishes praise on working people when they are listening, and then talks about how bitterly they cling to their religion and guns when those people aren’t listening. We tend to prefer candidates who don’t talk about us one way in Scranton and another way in San Francisco.

"I’m not a member of the permanent political establishment. And I’ve learned quickly, these past few days, that if you’re not a member in good standing of the Washington elite, then some in the media consider a candidate unqualified for that reason alone. But here’s a little news flash for all those reporters and commentators: I’m not going to Washington to seek their good opinion — I’m going to Washington to serve the people of this country. Americans expect us to go to Washington for the right reasons, and not just to mingle with the right people."

Palin was very much tonight the local-mom-made-good, the take-charge woman underestimated by the clueless local boys in their last mistake before losing power.

"I came to office promising major ethics reform, to end the culture of self-dealing," she said. "And today, that ethics reform is the law. While I was at it, I got rid of a few things in the governor’s office that I didn’t believe our citizens should have to pay for. That luxury jet was over the top. I put it on eBay.  I love to drive myself to work. And I thought we could muddle through without the governor’s personal chef — although I’ve got to admit that sometimes my kids sure miss her."

Not everything she said was as it seems. She said she told Congress "thanks, but no thanks" on the Bridge to Nowhere, but the truth is a little more cloudy.

She was an attack dog tonight.  "We’ve all heard his dramatic speeches before devoted followers," she said of Obama. "And there is much to like and admire about our opponent. But listening to him speak, it’s easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs, but not a single major law or reform — not even in the state Senate. This is a man who can give an entire speech about the wars America is fighting, and never use the word ‘victory’ except when he’s talking about his own campaign.

"But when the cloud of rhetoric has passed … when the roar of the crowd fades away … when the stadium lights go out, and those Styrofoam Greek columns are hauled back to some studio lot — when that happens, what exactly is our opponent’s plan? What does he actually seek to accomplish, after he’s done turning back the waters and healing the planet? The answer is to make government bigger … take more of your money … And to give you more orders from Washington … and to reduce the strength of America in a dangerous world."

Palin said that, "In politics, there are some candidates who use change to promote their careers.  And then there are those, like John McCain, who use their careers to promote change. They’re the ones whose names appear on laws and landmark reforms, not just on buttons and banners, or on self-designed presidential seals."

- jpt

User Comments

She knocked it out of the ball park.

Posted by: Maria | September 3, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Why is it that no one ever tells us who writes Bien’s speech or Barrack’s speech. This always leaves me wondering. But thanks fo rletting us know who wrote Palin’s speech.
Palin i sth enew Anne Richards…at least tonite she is.
Chapter 2 awaits.

Posted by: i am so I can!!!! | September 3, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

The speakers tonight (Wed.), including Gov. Palin, were a pack of junkyard dogs. Snarling, barking,growling–protecting nothing!
Disgusted in Northern New Mexico

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

She was pretty good! Maybe she should be at the top of the ticket and McCain should take a walk.
Still, the Alaska Seccessionism and these other skeletons are troubling.

Posted by: Ed from MA | September 4, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Great speech but we still have to wait and see how she does in the debate.

Posted by: William | September 4, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

She not only insulted Obama by lying about his experience and padding her own resume, but she insulted anyone who works to better their community.
This woman would be a farce if she wasn’t so scary.
You know, there was nothing admirable or honorable about her speech. But then, the GOP has been about hate and war for so long they’ve forgotten it used to be the GRAND Old Party. It’s no longer grand–it’s just sad.

Posted by: Mandalaina | September 4, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Maybe she did “knock it out of the park,” but I was personally disappointed. I wanted to hear why she wants to do this and how she can help McCain, not why the Democrats are wrong and McCain is a hero. I want to trust her and believe in her–right now, I think she’s sounded like the pitbull she described.

Posted by: Lynn | September 4, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I will do everything in my power to ensure that my children do not grow up in Sarah Palin’s world.
(by the way… aside from cutting ribbons and telling feuding Coucillors to simmer down… what does a small town mayor do???)

Posted by: PJ | September 4, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Wow. DNC, RNC, Berlin, Paris. London – SP would rock-the-house. I would pay money to see SP & BO “debate” in the mode of Lincoln – Douglas. And I know that BO has delivered when the buildup/ pressure was on. But he has never had to do so after an onslaught like SP has endured. I am at a loss to think of another recent example like this – where the person under-the-gun delivered like SP did tonight. And there may be an example of someone doing the same – but no one in the modern era has ever done it better. Historic, simply historic. She – um’ he – has my vote.

Posted by: lucky | September 4, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

As an attack it was good but speech wise, it was nothing. Todays speech will gain little or no votes. First imprression matters but her first impression made her look insultive. She is going to regret that community organiser remarks

Posted by: vuzous | September 4, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Well there were a number of lies but one of the worst was when talking about fighting washington insider politics and esp. the bridge to nowhere well McCains campaign is staffed by some 75 % lobbist esp. those at the top of his campaign. Oh and the money for the bridge to nowhere Alaska got it they just didn’t build the bridge they built all the roads going up to where it will begin and as gov. she did a speech to help get this money and said Washington thinks your nowhere well I don’t and she hired lobby firms to lobby for the money. But she’s an outsider YEAH RIGHT and Rush Limbaugh is a Liberal !!! and it was a Canadian firm she gave the contract to, to build this gas pipeline but their slogan is country first then find an american co. to do the pipeline and saying we need to use american resources the drill here drill now mindset well we used our best resource our brave men and women to fight in Iraq and the Bush admin lets China walk in and get contracts that American firms should have got to develope oil fields in IRAQ fields that will produce and low estimate of 125,000 barrels of oil a week within 3 yrs maybe sooner but BUSH/ McCain and the rest let CHINA our biggest worry for our country out there come in after OUR men and women clear the way with their blood and lives and TAKE a contract to get the oil out of IRAQ right under our noses and our men and women will probally be the ones protecting China’s people in the fields and their equipment and the oil being shipped out and their tankers in the straights with our navy !!! yeah that’s the Kind of leadership we need one last thing She also said that it is their responsibilty to leave the country better then it was when they took office !! REALLY well then are your better off NOW then when Bush, who McCain voted with 90% of the time are you better of NOW then when W took over and was rubber stamped by McCain and the rest of the GOP for 7 yrs ?

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | September 4, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Don’t mistake the speaker for the speechwriter.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

i am so I can!!!! , nobody talks about who writes Obama’s speeches because Obama writes his own speeches.
She did a fine job, no doubt (I mean when was the last time you heard a bad acceotance speech?). But now she has allowed Obama to take the gloves off. For all her posturing as a nice, local girl, she was a ruthless, dishonest attack dog tonight and she should get ready. This is not Alaska baby. This is the big leagues.

Posted by: Kevin | September 4, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

She couldn’t have done a better job. What an amazing choice and what a strong, vibrant and impressive woman. I don’t agree with everything Gov. Palin or Sen. McCain say, but they are both honorable, caring people who can laugh at themselves. The humor in her speech, as well as Rudy Guliani’s speech, was such a stark contrast to the DNC convention.

Posted by: Traci | September 4, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

She is crazier and more unfit than McCain. The vitrol and hate spewed from her mouth sounded like Karl Rove had given her lessons. I have decided to vote for Obama now.

Posted by: Arlene | September 4, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Sarah was great. Getting out my checkbook. Its nice to have someone who believes in America and its traditional values, rather than just a blow hard like BO.

Posted by: Keepyourheelsdown | September 4, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Yes, interesting comment about speech writers….Biden for sure gets help and B. Hussein is certainly not writing on his own, but never a mention of that. The test will be at the debates that Obama dodges and avoids at all costs, because of his speech impediment, ug, ah, um, agh……I sure hope Gov. Palin is clearer in her speech than Obama’s stammering, when off script.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN, despite all the Obots working here tonight

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Delivering a speech you didn’t write is not qualification to have your finger on the button. And how insulting to all people who work hard to improve their own and others communities! Social workers, doctors,lawyers, regular folk, teachers and the poor as well as church groups – I’m sure they don’t “actually make any decisions”. How utterly rude!

Posted by: cda | September 4, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Dear Sarah:
It’s the job of journalists and the news media to asks questions of your qualifications. You need to grow up and answer the questions without sounding like you are whining. Oh — that’s right — its okay for you to complain about the media being sexist but not Hillary. You are every feminists worst nightmare.

Posted by: Kathie | September 4, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

The Libs are worried even more so now. I couldn’t be happier.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 4, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Obama must be having a meltdown right about now.
The smoothest delivery I’ve probably ever seen.
The media thought they could crush her and she threw it right back at them.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Not another republican who can’t pronounce ‘nuclear’. She even had it spelled phonetically on the teleprompter ‘new-clear’. I can’t imagine anything worse than having her one McCain breath away from the Oval Office.

Posted by: Mike | September 4, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

It’s a shame people don’t do a little basic research before posting.
The word in Alaska is that Palin rarely needs or uses a teleprompter; she’s good with one and even better without one. Unlike Bambi. uh uh uh

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

The Lib response we see here and will see in the coming days tells us how well she did. HOME RUN!!! [and she looked great, too]

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 4, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

The McCain campaign plans to dump her. If they were keeping her, they would have made her look credibly presidential. Instead they used her as an attack dog and cheerleader. The Republican cynicism runneth over.

Posted by: Dema | September 4, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Mike:
Not another republican who can’t pronounce ‘nuclear’. She even had it spelled phonetically on the teleprompter ‘new-clear’.”
Sure. Liar.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

We know it was a great speech when posters have to start lying about it. Homerun.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

What makes you think that Obama writes his speeches? How would he have time?

Posted by: Keepyourheelsdown | September 4, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Traci your right there is a stark contrast from the DNC speeches and these 2 these 2 were NEGATIVE and thge DNC speeches were POSITIVE Republicans for Obama 08 !!!!!

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | September 4, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Waiting for the debates when more will be revealed.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Dema – you’re delusional. McCain isn’t dumping her. But keep pretending if it helps you sleep at night.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

==The smoothest delivery I’ve probably ever seen.==
I didn’t even hear a “uh” or “um.”

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 4, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

TO: i am so I can!!!!
Barack Obama wrote his own acceptance speech, as all the media outlets reported.
Sarah Palin was just reading aloud whatever the campaign speech writers placed in front of her. She’s a puppet. Whatever ‘clever’ attack lines she spewed tonight weren’t even her own!
Can’t wait to see her debate Joe Biden. No speech writers to save her then.

Posted by: Sarah Epic Failin' | September 4, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Chris Wallace said to Howard Wolfsen: “You’ve got problems.”
Then Howard compliments her.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

Any doubt that the McCain/Palin campaign has gone negative? One nasty, vicious smear attack after another. Lots of hate, not a lot of hope. Tonight clenched it for me…”eight is enough”, this Clinton supporter is throwing her energy into Obama/Biden.

Posted by: Amy T | September 4, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

She delivers a good speech as was expected. I was touched and believed her when she said she would be a champion for special needs kids. But she insulted all those who do good works in the community when she insulted commmunity organizers. You don’t have to have an elected office to serve. That was snobbish and mean spirited. And the basic question is: if she must step in for John McCain, could she be president on the spot. The answer is a definitive NO. Every other consideration is secondary. In a time of great challenge for America she would be a heartbeat away. Can’t risk it.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

It was a flat speech, that gave nothing to the American people, it only energized the Repukians…
It was full of lies:
Bridge to nowhere
Earmarks
Wasteful spending
and she repeated all those lies again, even tho, other better media outlets have already exposed those lies…
She spoke about things she knew nothing about… ie, irag, economy, foreign affairs.
How in the world can ABC say she was fantastic…
ABC has give free passes to McCain and now they are giving Palin a free pass.
She was flat and uninspiring…

Posted by: lmg | September 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Even NPR’s commentators liked the speech and her.
Which means the trash the media and the web site that cannot be mentioned will work all the harder at ginning up controversy and rumors.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Close your eyes and try to imagine her as president. Now stop shuddering, open your eyes, and vote for Obama.

Posted by: TKD | September 4, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

…..and her delivery in interviews is also very good. Perhaps because she believes what she says and knows what she is talking about. Libs are worried sick. :)

Posted by: Keepyourheelsdown | September 4, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Wolfson on Fox:
“She was able to stick the knife in Barack Obama and do it effectively. She was very very good.”
“That shot of her and the family on stage was priceless”
“Democrats have reasons to be concerned…”
Nothing bad to say.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

It’s funny – I had no preconceived ideas about Sarah Palin before tonight, and what I see from the Obama supporters are that she was snide, she’s scary, she’s a pitbull, etc. Funny thing – this is what you said about Hillary Clinton.
Careful, it certainly seems like you are scared, and I can’t believe Obama, who can’t laugh at himself due to his serious messiah complex, isn’t having a fit right now.
If truth were told, I’d bet Hillary Clinton is secretly cheering. For the first time since she gave in to the DNC pressure, I am excited about this race. And, no, it’s not about party or party loyalty – it’s about our country and what’s best for it.

Posted by: Traci | September 4, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Peach,
Isn’t Chris Wallace a man?
I think so.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

I’m pretty independent and to me she sounded insulting, mocking, snarky and petty. There was nothing there for Independents who don’t HATE Obama. I’m looking for the best ticket regardless of party and at least Obama showed respect. Guiliani / Mitt / Palin were like children mocking and insulting without putting forward a similar policy. They energized the base, but turned off A LOT of Independents. At no point did I see her and think “There is a future President”. Maybe since I am not the “base” I missed something?

Posted by: Jaded | September 4, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Sorry Mike – don’t see it in the speech you linked.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

Kate – yes. Chris Wallace is a man. He’s Mike Wallace’s son. He said “A star was born tonight.”

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Fantastic!
A new conservative leader is born……..welcome back Reagan democrats…..

Posted by: j | September 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

That sound you hear is the sound of Liberal’s heads exploding all across the country. I have just delved into the sewers of the Lefty blogs, and they are all apoplectic because Sarah Palin is the real deal! She totally hit it out of the park tonight and Obama has the tire tracks up his back to prove it.
After being savaged for a week by the intolerant, hate speech Leftwing blogs, and their media lapdogs, Sarah Palin just shut them all the hell up!

Posted by: OxyCon | September 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

You could tell how effective her speech
was by the sick, depressed look on
Andrea Mitchell’s face while she did
interviews afterwards. If MSNBC is a bellwether of the left media, they
must be in a tizzy in the Ohbama war
room tonight.

Posted by: grizzly bare | September 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

If the “Little Lady” thinks that the media should lay off the “sexism” then she is nuts, she took the gloves off and it is an all out fight!

Posted by: Sunny | September 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

You could tell how effective her speech
was by the sick, depressed look on
Andrea Mitchell’s face while she did
interviews afterwards. If MSNBC is a bellwether of the left media, they
must be in a tizzy in the Ohbama war
room tonight.

Posted by: grizzly bare | September 4, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

The “Bisquick-and-Crisco-Crowd” will eat it up, but it won’t score one Independent or disaffected Dem vote.
Tracy Flick did an adequate job mouthing Bush’s writer’s speech–Damn, she cloistered herself up all week to memorize it!
But look for major backlash. Obama has already demonstrated message focus in his response.

Posted by: Patricia in SF | September 4, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Dennis Fort Myers, if you think Joe Biden’s screaming about how awful McCain is was “positive” then there’s not anything I could say to change your mind.
Seems like there’s a lot of fright and a lot of anger, and it’s the Obama/Biden group that has that anger. If she’s so bad and so unqualified, why all the attacks? Why are you so angry? I think, as the saying goes, you “doth protest too much.”
I just hope people who have open minds and hearts and want what’s best for our country – and aren’t just tied to party loyalty – will see how dangerous Obama is.

Posted by: Traci | September 4, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

OUTSTANDING JOB GOV PALIN!!!!
McCain/Palin – GOT MY VOTE!
(And I’m a DEM)

Posted by: Molly | September 4, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

grizzly bare – I do believe you are correct. Andrea Mitchell has been quoting the most far left web site rumor mongering by the mentally unstable.

Posted by: Peach | September 4, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Traci,
Hillary cheering the Gov? Hillary who is pro-choice, pro sex education in highschools, not a creationist,not wanting more right-wingers on the Supreme Court, etc.?
Surely you jest.
Like her as a person, perhaps, but cheering her on? I don’t think so.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

She did well reading the Bush speech although 8 is enough….

Posted by: Jennifer | September 4, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

The GOP is right about two things. They said their campaign would not be positive and it would not be about the issues. They are delivering on that. After 8 years of their disastrous leadership they have nothing to run on -they’re reduced to nothing but the personal attacks unleashed by Giuliani and Palin.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 4, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

lmg,
I agree, Not only the lies again that you mentioned, but it was thin, flat and sounded like my 8th grade teacher during a boring lecture…
Of course all the Republicans were going wild for the TV audience – they had to!
This woman is a lightweight and I can’t wait to see her on Meet the press!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 4, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

The nearest thing I’ve seen to Evita. She just has that magical quality that captivates people. I couldn’t take my eyes off her.

Posted by: Marty | September 4, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

LOL! “New-Clear”.

Posted by: Patricia in SF | September 4, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I loved it. She’s Hillary 2.0+

Posted by: Susan | September 4, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Well, for me, I don’t like Obama AT ALL, She sounded great! BTW Jake, perfect title, perfect article I love the way I am feeling after Palin’s speech. I want a game where she and Obama have boxing gloves and I want to see her kick his butt the way she did tonight! Hmmmm Palin made me happy. BsO makes me Angry. Hmmm Hmmm Hmm, who to chose.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

ITS GREAT TO SEE ALL THE ANIEXTY FROM ALL THE LIBS HERE…… I’D BE WORRIED TOO IF I WERE THEM.
SARAH KNKOCKED IT OUT OF THE PARK….WITH TRUTH, STRENGTH, CONVICTION.
COULD WE BE LOOKING AT ANOTHER REAGAN IN THE MAKING?

Posted by: j | September 4, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

The dems are digging the hole deeper. Harry Reed called the speech “shrill”. Didn’t they use that word on Hillary Clinton?

Posted by: Gretchen | September 4, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

All the pundits voices were quivering, except for the FOX News people, they knew she was ON!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Palin is a lightweight!
Her speech that she read off the teleprompter was especially towards the end, given without passion or real conviction.
Democrats, I think it is time to release the weapon that can’t be called SEXIST by the Republicans…
It is time to release HILLARY!!!
She will pound this little “hockey mom” into the dirt!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 4, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Ladies and gentlemen, you may have witnessed the greatest political speech EVER given. Mark my word!!!!!!

Posted by: ConnieR | September 4, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

How come people keep mentioning that Bush speech writer wrote her speech? Who wrote Obama’s acceptance speech? No one asked? Who writes any of Obama’s speeches? No one cares. Now all over sudden who write Sarah’s speeches is important information.

Posted by: coolrepublica | September 4, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Ruh roh.
Emails show Palin was far more involved in Trooper gate then she first let on.
I look forward to her deposition.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

I loved this speech, and the fact that it was given by a candidate the MSM tried to destroy is icing on the cake.

Posted by: BJinChicago | September 4, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

You’re right Marty. I had to put my daughter to sleep after the speech. I said I wanted to watch it again. Usually I read to my daughter, except tonite she said: “It’s okay mommy, just find the speech and put the tv up loud so that I can hear it, so that I can go to sleep happy about Palin Baracuda Girl.” Okay BABY! She was AWESOME!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Seriously, how can one go from Hillary to Sara (sp?). Their politics are so different. Please explain. I must be missing something.
Thanks.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I have been an ardent supporter/volunteer for Sen. Obama’s presidential campaign, and will continue to do whatever I can to make him our 44th president. However, I do not write this email as an Obama supporter or democrat. I write this as a proud parent of two young children, who along with my partner of 11 years have been working hard to keep our business afloat and our family safe. Never believing John McCain possessed the insight or qualifications to be president, I wasn’t completely surprised regarding his selection of Sharon Palin as his VP. However, the profound disrespect for, and complete misunderstanding of the judgment, power, and responsibility the presidency demands, exemplified by his VP choice not only confirmed my beliefs, but left me totally outraged!
For six years now, we have all been profoundly and adversely affected by the unjust and illegal invasion of Iraq, and the protracted unsuccessful war in Afghanistan. As Americans, we have been made to carry the burden of death and destruction, and the shame of torture and illegal detentions that have turned the world against us. We have lost thousands of troops, murdered countless numbers of innocent Iraqi’s and Afghani’s, and we now stand alone in the world as an isolated, antiquated, roguish nation. To this John McCain says, we can stay over there (in Iraq) for a hundred years. I say enough!
As a nation we have been profoundly and adversely affected by the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. An impressive and powerful natural disaster that exposed not only an unacceptable level of government incompetence, but a horrific degree of racism and classism that belies policies crafted by the Bush administration, special interest groups and lobbyists. The non-wealthy residents of Louisiana were hung out to dry and left for dead, and as we viewed this horrific spectacle, John McCain, having knowledge of the devastation taking place in New Orleans, ate birthday cake with President Bush. As the waters receded, and the residents of the gulf region began to realize the enormity of their the loss, becoming displaced from their families, friends and property, John McCain voted against relief measures for Katrina victims multiple times, (2006 Senate Vote #112, 5/4/2006; 2005 Senate Vote #285, 11/3/2005; 2005 Senate Vote #234, 9/15/2005). The citizens of the gulf stood tough against disaster and brave in the face of humiliation as they were constantly referred to as “refugees” by their own country, and John McCain, having voted against an investigation into the failures of this government (2006 Senate Vote #6, 2/2/2006; 2005 Senate Vote #229, 9/14/2005), brazenly stated:
“We know we didn’t have the right kind of leadership … where government agencies were getting information from watching cable television rather than have a flow of information,” McCain said during an event at Xavier University in New Orleans.
“It was not only a perfect storm as far as its physical impact … it was a perfect storm as far as the federal, state and local governments’ inability.”
“Never again will there be a mismanaged natural disaster,” he said, later assuring the crowd that “it will never happen again in this country; you have my commitment and my promise.”
Now John McCain is at it again! Set to the backdrop of hurricane Gustav, McCain and Palin are attempting to exploit the potential devastation and loss of our citizens in the gulf region for their own political gain. Enough treachery!
We see all across America banks faltering and the number of foreclosures looming as large as since the great depression. We, as well as our families, friends and neighbors have lost what we’ve worked so hard to attain, and John McCain intends to continue down this disastrous path. Much like Herbert Hoover, who during the great depression, determined that the crisis would have to work itself out. John McCain believes that government does not exist to help people, but rather create a privatized free market society in which government is called upon (in every capacity, except war) as an absolute last resort. In other words, the economic and environmental crisis we currently find ourselves in, will (without his help as president) have to work itself out. Sen. McCain of seven houses, states that he doesn’t know much about economics, and that people are doing pretty well under the Bush Administration. This kind of out of touch republican nonsense needs to stop! John McCain is behaving as if he’s playing a game! A game where he spins a wheel and says hey, let’s see what happens if…
Look, John McCain is a 72 year old man with very real and serious health concerns (melanoma), who’s running to become the United States 44th president! Now, after one meeting, he selects as his VP, a women who despite her claims, is a good friend of big oil. Sarah Palin has only three years of public service experience. One as the mayor of her small Alaskan town (pop. 5,470), and two years — one term — as governor of the state (pop.700,000). She has no foreign policy experience, stating she knows very little about what is happening in Iraq! She has stated that she isn’t sure what a VP does, and as a former member/currently active supporter of the AIP (Alaskan Independent Party), a group vigorously pursuing the secession for Alaska from the United States, she would maybe consider the position if it would be productive for the state of Alaska! She doesn’t believe global warming exists, and sued the Interior Department to have polar bears removed from the protected species list, to not inconvenience the Alaskan gas pipeline project. She is an ex-catholic, rabid anti-abortionist, believing that under no circumstances should a woman ever be allowed to have an abortion, and stands against equal work for equal pay. She supported the bridge to nowhere until it unfavorably polled, and she quit her job as ethics commissioner after a year, stating that the Republican Party was too corrupt to fulfill her job duties. She opposes civil rights for gays/lesbians as well as benefits for domestic partners, and is a proponent of creationism teaching in schools. The list is long; the reality frightening, and the GOP really expects this country to accept the possibility that she could be our next president? I don’t think so. Let’s put an end to this and work together to make Barack Obama/Joe Biden the next President/Vice President of the United States!
http://www.barackobama.com/index.php
Sincerely,
J. Taylor

Posted by: J.Taylor | September 4, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Kate,
You’re missing nothing.
Hillary and Palin are political opposites.
But right wingers like to pretend they are Hillary supporters who love McCain and Palin.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Libs are a known quanity.
However, just watch conservatives come outta the woodwork in November to elect McCain/Palin.
Thank you, Sarah “Baracuda”!

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 4, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

Wonderful!
Its settled for me, McCain/Palin in November. I don’t trust Obama, in fact to this day, we don’t know who he his. But its clear he’s not qualified.

Posted by: voted for Hillary | September 4, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

She resounded with leadership. She’s proven that she’s willing to take on ALL THE BIG GOVERNMENT SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS. I think she hit the nail on the head when she said she’s not afraid of attacking waste and that she want’s to work FOR THE PEOPLE AND THE GOOD OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Posted by: Brenda Monsey | September 4, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

Palin has said previously that she discussed Wooten with Monegan only in the context of security concerns for the family. Monegan has said that Palin never directly told him to fire Wooten but that the message was clearly conveyed through repeated messages from Palin, her husband and three members of her Cabinet.
“To allege that I, or any member of my family . . . directed disciplinary action be taken against any employee of the Department of Public Safety, is, quite simply, outrageous,” Palin said in a statement in mid-July after Monegan’s dismissal.
In August, Palin acknowledged that “pressure could have been perceived to exist, although I have only now become aware of it.”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

She was awesome. The neo-Dems trashed Hillary and told her supporters to forgettabout it, because they had no place else to go. Guess, they were wrong.
McCain, Palin, 2008!

Posted by: BJinChicago | September 4, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Hey let’s not forget Rudy as a warm up….he was on target too. Great convention, and no props or rock bands to celebritize it. Great night for All Americans/COUNTRY FIRST – McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I love Hillary and I know that if she goes after Palin, she will show a lot more class than Obama ever showed going after her, oops having everyone but him go after Hillary.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

This woman can dish it out, with a smile, class, and wit. Hillary can
dish it out…..with the charm and
warmth of an iceberg. Vive la difference!

Posted by: grizzly bare | September 4, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Wow, a great speech and no rock stars to draw a crowd. Amazing. Seems like change I can believe.

Posted by: Pasu | September 4, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Patricia,
Obama?
Hillary cast her vote for him, released her delegates to “vote their conscience,” moved that he be nominated by acclimation …
Palin, on the other hand, shredded him–good Christian that she is (sorry, I just couldn’t resist).
So no I still don’t get how someone could work for Hillary AND WHAT SHE STANDS FOR to be president and then switch to Sara and WHAT SHE STANDS FOR.
These women are total opposites!!
Not that they can agree on some matters and get along.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Posted by: j | Sep 4, 2008 12:25:07 AM about Palin as a Reagan in the making.
I’m glad you brought this point up. I’ve had the same feeling about her in the last few days. A politician who did not set out to be one and yet somehow mysteriously guided down that path and have conviction to turn the mass’ dreams into reality.
I am overwhelmed by her delivery tonight. Uncanny resemblance of Reagan’s style – simple, concise and humor.

Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 4, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Lightweight? Are you kidding? I’m absolutely thrilled that she zinged the left-wing press. By the way, the speech writers had to re-write several times, and right up to convention time, because she wanted more of her own words on that paper. We heard more of the real Palin that we did the real Obama folks. Get it right.

Posted by: Bobbie | September 4, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

Wow…this woman is awesome and just what this country needs. I was only voting for McCain because he is obviously the best choice…but the addition of Mrs. Palin to the ticket solidifies the choice for me and many of my friends.
I am sure the Obama’s are a nice family, but I really don’t believe he has even an inkling as to how to run this country – I truly believe he would be positively DISASTEROUS for our country. I want to know why it is that liberals worry so much about what the rest of the world think of America……..let us worry about ourselves!
During Mrs. Palins speech I kept visualizing a heel in the middle of Obama’s back…pressing him harder and harder into the ground. I think it is over for Obama…..I can not wait ’til the debates! YOWZA! Rock on Sarah!

Posted by: KJ | September 4, 2008, 12:40 am 12:40 am

Howard Wolfson Hillary advisor said “Democrats have reason to be concerned”. They thought it was a slam dunk, even tho their boy has never been more than 8 points ahead and only once since their convention. The power that was taken away from Hillary supporter will be great….not 18 mill, but maybe 5 million, and it will be interesting to see how that plays out.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

Sarah Palin has given me reason to vote Republican! She was absolutely terrific!
She is the female version of Ronald Reagan. I loved her speech! Watch out Ohhhhbama!

Posted by: Denise | September 4, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Sarah Palin’s record of intimidation and corruption in Alaska is being uncovered by the media. It is only a matter of time before the beauty queen is history.
Assuming that all those on this blog are not born again fire breathers, you should be aware that because of her, Alaska’s population of evangelical christians is sky rocketing, making the population disproportionally in favor of the hard line, bible thumping measures so favored by her creed. No all conservatives are republican, and not all republican’s are born again creationists. I recommend that you look into the real Sarah Palin before you buy the product being sold here. She is not who she pretends to be.

Posted by: Mythical Me | September 4, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

EWWW. Steph Miller is given way too much time on CNN. SHe always sounds like she’s hung over.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

Harry Reid called her speech “shrill”. You know you’re doing something right when you tick of Reid.

Posted by: Mary | September 4, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Heck with Biden, I want to see her dabate Obama. She’d have Obama wearing the lipstick.

Posted by: Ben | September 4, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Clinton aides agree that Palin’s treatment in the media has been sexist. Ouch. That’s got to hurt.

Posted by: Ron | September 4, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

where’s the beef?
more of the same ol’ fear, namecalling, and attacks, now… louder.
sounded like kindergarten. that where we’re heading?
libs scared? whatever.
here’s one lib that’s shrugging. what a joke republicans have become. the typical right-wing dog and pony show every 4 years. all talk, nothing delivered.
enough already.

Posted by: theo | September 4, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

McCain campaign now claims that the telepromter operator screwed up during the speech.
Hmmmm now what attack does that fit in with.
So phony..

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

okay, I can’t watch CNN preaching at us anymore. I know what the issues are but I also know I can’t stand you all on C NNSANE!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Sarah Palin speech: Top notch! The Best! Clearly the next vice-president of the United States of America.

Posted by: Clear thinking | September 4, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

A breath of fresh air. She bought the house down. The plain truth about the emptyness of Obama and his high sounding rhetoric, the real solutions for change, and proven experience of McCain.
McCain/Palin are the real deal!

Posted by: I'm in | September 4, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

RON; quick, what channel are you watching please?

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Ryan c “McCain campaign now claims that the telepromter operator screwed up during the speech.
Hmmmm now what attack does that fit in with.
So phony..”
That’s not even true. McCain is claiming no such thing.

Posted by: Paul | September 4, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

This is not this woman original thoughts.She read on a tele-prompter what a well paid speech writer wrote.How do I know this? Because my husband is a speech writer.

Posted by: orangecat | September 4, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

The media should be soooooooooo ashamed of themselves. CNN was so flustered that it sounded like they said “he be we be she be”.

Posted by: Coop | September 4, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Thanks Ron!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Oh, Ryan, you are such a fool if you think Hill supporter here are really Republicans. I’m an Independent who voted for and contributed to Hillary. Last week I donated to McCain for the second time and tonight will be my third. There are about 5 million Hill for McCain/Palin supporters….deal with it.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Let’s admit it – we all on both sides of the aisle think Washington is broken.
This woman is someone everybody except on the hard right and hard left can relate to.
She seems like the real deal for once. I’m in.

Posted by: Ron | September 4, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Oh YEAHHHHHH. One more thing. The REPUBLICANS ON THE BLOGS have been so much nicer to me and other Hillary supporters than BsO’s!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Heck with Biden, I want to see her dabate Obama. She’d have Obama wearing the lipstick.
Posted by: Ben | Sep 4, 2008 12:43:07 AM
========================================
You Republicans forget, Palin is not running for president! She is not at the top of the ticket! Ha, ha, ha!!!!
That old fool is up tomorrow night! Hope he can talk about something other than being a POW!!!!
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 4, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

THE FOLKS ON LARRY KING LIVE ARE A JOKE. PALIN ROCKED!!!!

Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 4, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Anderson Cooper was actually claiming that Obama’s time running as president should count as experience. Do ya think he’s biased?

Posted by: Ken | September 4, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Concerned in Ohio – those people on that blog have moved the party to a place JFK would not recognize.
And Obama attended their convention which is really poor judgment.

Posted by: Ron | September 4, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

S. Miller was vile with Hillary. I’ll NEVER FORGET. She SUCKS! Sorry, had to let that out.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

So glad I threw my tv out 15 years ago — just listening to your comments about it reminds me how awful it is to be told how to think, what to do, etc.
Anyway, I’m voting Obama.
Time will tell.
In the meantime, let’s stay calm. We don’t need to get heated up and call each other names (just like the tv talking heads whom we profess to hate). What’s the point?
Best to all of you!
Good night and good dreams.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

J. Taylor, you are clearly out of touch with middle America. The acceptance of your liberal minded, unhealthy values are NOT as wide-spread as you would like to believe. Your comments are truly from a very deep-seeded right wing mentality and it’s very depressing that people who think like you might be leading our country. It saddens me to see what has become of our morality and people like you who feel so rightous about our family values being stomped into the dirt.

Posted by: Bobbie | September 4, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

I love the way Sarah hit back at the left wing media. They got their due. And Rudy!, WOW! nailed the lack of experience issue on Obama.
Sarah has more experience than Obama, and would be a better president.

Posted by: I'm in | September 4, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Rudy rocked the house down. He was vintage Rudy.

Posted by: Ron | September 4, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

VoteVets is discussing whther Palin vilolated Operational Security by announcing her son’s deployment.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Concerned in OH, been that way at MSNBS the whole time. I stopped watching about a year ago now.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

The Democrats are out in full force lying and distorting what Governor Palin
said in her speech. She put the Dems in their place. Their idea of change is just more taxes and give aways.
She was fresh air in a stale political election. Obama is the dog coming out of the dirty sewer of Chicago’s south side with his criminal and terrorist friends. McCain/Palin are decent qualified candidates.
Moms and residents from small towns should consider this more qualified candidate.

Posted by: Martin | September 4, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Why would anyone watch CNN or MSNBC the most biased news on cable and #2 and #3 in the ratings. Yes, that’s right FOX news is #1 and has been for ages, BECASUE MOST AMERICANS ARE RIGHT OF CENTER…..the centrists that determine the outcome of this and every election. No big lib ever wins WH. Bill only won because he was a centrist, and BO the #1 Liberal in the Senate who is now pretending to move to the center is a fraud. He who would stand with the Muslims if the political winds were to change…quote from his book. Never…B. Hussein

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Wow, some sour grapes on Larry King tonight. I think I hear some tears.

Posted by: Gwyen | September 4, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Long on zingers short on substance, fired up the base but does little to move the independents.

Posted by: Thinking | September 4, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Gwyen – you know it was an effective speech when CNN staffers are crying

Posted by: Ron | September 4, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Bush Signed Obama’s First Bill Into Law.
10/3/06 “U.S. Senator Barack Obama’s first piece of legislation, the so-called “Google for Government” act, made it through both houses of Congress last month. When President Bush signed the bill into law last Tuesday, the freshman lawmaker scored his first solo victory in his longtime campaign to increase government accountability.” Daily Ilini
Bridge To Nowhere? She supported it until she found out Alaska would have to cover the rest of the expenses. And she kept the Indicted Ted Stevens Earmark money anyway.
When we get the details on the sister’s taxes, McCain is done.

Posted by: kravitz | September 4, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Debra,
People don’t believe the Clinton supporter for McCain nonsense.
Your claim of 5 million supporter would be more than half of what McCain got in the primaries.
A laughable claim on its face from a fake Hillary supporter.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Listening to callers on C-SPAN Alaskan’s Dems and Reps love her. They sound proud.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Governor Palin made a gutsy, on the ball speech. She told it as it really is. GO GO GO GO GO SARAH PALIN
Obama’s attack dogs sure came out snarling, distorting and completely ludicous.

Posted by: mary | September 4, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

and let’s not forget..
Sarah Palin is resisting testifying in Troopergate.
because she would be giving testimony before the election.
it’s an ad anyway, so who cares.
hehehehehehehehehe.

Posted by: kravitz | September 4, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

From Martin:
“Obama is the dog coming out of the dirty sewer of Chicago’s south side with his criminal and terrorist friends. McCain/Palin are decent qualified candidates. ”
Wow! I’m from Chicago’s South Side and proud of it and the winning White Sox. Could you find it within yourself to apologize for that remark?
I had signed off, then read Martin’s post, and felt I had to call him on it.
Why in the world can’t these posts be civil?

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

Foxnews viewers have been shown to be 4 times more likely than other news watchers to believe things that are proven to be untrue.
It was nice to hear the honest thoughts of Peggy Noonan and Mike Murphy today when they called Palin unqualified, a gimmick pick and a political bs narrative. Of course it was an open mike they were unaware of so they let out their honest feelings instead of the plastered on smiles the Republicans have been wearing this week.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

I thought Gov Palin was absolutely fantastic tonight and this, a compliment from a Massachusetts Democrat.
I may not agree with all of Mrs. Palin’s political views but she was smart, witty, charming and on fire, tonight.
Let the games begin!!!

Posted by: Susie | September 4, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

She make a great play to the right wing conservatives, and it looked good on TV, but, alas, those right wing conservatives are a small minority in the melting pot that is the USA today. There are so many other factions: hispanics, jewish, asian, arabs, just plain white folk, who listen to that right wing rhetoric and go “huh??”.
Welcome to 21st century America.

Posted by: JudiNV | September 4, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

I am a former Clinton supporter for McCain. Ryan obviously knows nothing.
Posted by: Samantha | Sep 4, 2008 1:05:29 AM
=========================================
Gee, you must be the only one left sweetie!
Hillary will be out shortly to take out your pretty new beauty queen palin soon!!

Posted by: Davis | September 4, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

Traci one more thing you claim I and the DNC doesn’t know whats good for the country does that mean you think the GOP does have you been paying attn. the last 8 yrs when they have been rubberstampping this president the worst in US history lead by John (I vote 90 % of the time with W and I am proud of it ) McCain but don’t try and tie me to his failures McCain I mean which way is it either he is the 90% guy oh which is 100% this yr or is he the “maverick” that fights the insiders I’ll go with his votes not his words they are tied at the hip and Bushes failings are McCains too.

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | September 4, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Belittling the community organizing Obama did in the 80s at the start of his career, huh?
Well, she might as well as said that everything Martin Luther King did was insignificant because he was a community organizer.
Nice that she can read and act out the words of that someone wrote for her, and managed still to lie about her record as wee.

Posted by: Community Organizer Martin Luther King | September 4, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

The women on C NNsane trashed Hillary like crazy with sexist comments which was mind boggling to me. Now they act like they have a right to scream sexism? EEEEWWWW, they’re just creepy. I am flipping channels, with all this TIMEWARNER cable control, things sure are LIMITED. I WAS a DEM for years, now IND and I am always a Hillary Supporter, however I have no problem giving kudos to a Republican like Palin as well as Giulliani for their Zingers. They were very ANN RICHARDS with the humorous blow. I definitely enjoyed it and they knew we would. THANKS for the GREAT SHOW!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

She’s turdblossom in a dress, alright, but snarky isn’t playing to the cheap seats anymore. the base, born again Christians, are wealthy, self absorbed, denizens of the bible belt — largely out of touch with the rest of the country, but boy do they love her!. They are also the fastest growing segment of the population in Alaska, which accounts for her poll ratings there. She’s an evangelical rock star, but I wonder if McCain isn’t having second thoughts tonight.
Ms. Palin got a standing O, but when she mentioned John McCain’s name, not so much. The point of the convention is to build the momentum for the candidate. Ouch. looks to me like McCain hitched his wagon to the wrong rock star.
When they lose, she can go back to terrorizing the more moderate population in Alaska, and killing all the wolves, as she gathers her flock to prepare for the rapture.

Posted by: Mythical Me | September 4, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Well there were a number of lies but one of the worst was when talking about fighting washington insider politics and esp. the bridge to nowhere well McCains campaign is staffed by some 75 % lobbist esp. those at the top of his campaign. Oh and the money for the bridge to nowhere Alaska got it they just didn’t build the bridge they built all the roads going up to where it will begin and as gov. she did a speech to help get this money and said Washington thinks your nowhere well I don’t and she hired lobby firms to lobby for the money. But she’s an outsider YEAH RIGHT and Rush Limbaugh is a Liberal !!! and it was a Canadian firm she gave the contract to, to build this gas pipeline but their slogan is country first then find an american co. to do the pipeline and saying we need to use american resources the drill here drill now mindset well we used our best resource our brave men and women to fight in Iraq and the Bush admin lets China walk in and get contracts that American firms should have got to develope oil fields in IRAQ fields that will produce and low estimate of 125,000 barrels of oil a week within 3 yrs maybe sooner but BUSH/ McCain and the rest let CHINA our biggest worry for our country out there come in after OUR men and women clear the way with their blood and lives and TAKE a contract to get the oil out of IRAQ right under our noses and our men and women will probally be the ones protecting China’s people in the fields and their equipment and the oil being shipped out and their tankers in the straights with our navy !!! yeah that’s the Kind of leadership we need one last thing She also said that it is their responsibilty to leave the country better then it was when they took office !! REALLY well then are your better off NOW then when Bush, who McCain voted with 90% of the time are you better of NOW then when W took over and was rubber stamped by McCain and the rest of the GOP for 7 yrs ?

Posted by: Dennis Fort Myers Fl | September 4, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

So I have a question, McCain was by his own admission committing adultery while still serving in the Navy, why was he not court martialed?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

Long faces at CNN tonight, even Larry sounds down with his all Dem/Lib panel…wow, so far all 6 panelists bashing Reps. Larry asked an idiotic question with “do you think she used her family tonight?”…My God, do you think every time Obama has trotted out his girls, given EXTRA interviews and posed for mag covers HE WAS QUESTIONED?
God, Larry, at least a couple of the women stood up for her and said their kids are relevent on that stage….ya, think….didn’t Michelle trot them out last week and they said “I love you Daddy”. They forget to mention that.
Sad only FOX is telling it like it is.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

“Why is it, Ryan that those who were pro Clinton and now say they’re for McCain and Palin are always “FAKE” HIllary supporters?”
Because McCain and Palin stand against everything that Hillary stands for and for everything Hillary stands against.
To claim is one supported Hillary(not just liked her, hard core support claims) but now fully support McCain Palin show a political split personality.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

Ryan, I supported (and still do) Hillary Clinton and contributed to her campaign – the first time in my life I contributed to any politician’s campaign. I am not a Democrat (although I was registered as one, I switched to Independent), and I don’t vote by party and never have.
The DNC has manipulated this election – I don’t know that it’s sexism as much, I would guess, as it is fright and jealousy of the Clintons by people like Pelosi and Dean. They have pushed Obama upward, a candidate who said in his acceptance speech he would lower taxes and fix Social Security (impossible to do both). Obama is questioned and race becomes the factor; as a Hillary Clinton supporter, I have been called a racist on blogs simply because I would not support him, although I gave detailed, well thought-out reasons why.
There are undoubtedly people on both sides of the aisle who are hateful and nasty, who use words as weapons and hide behind the anonymous shield of the internet to do so. However, in my experience, it has by far been the Obama supporters who launch the most negative, nasty, personal attacks (first against Hillary Clinton, then about McCain – why is it necessary to be childish and call him McBush?).
Maybe you think you know what you’re talking about, and only time will tell for sure – but I can assure you that I agree with Debra, and many others do as well. Only 66% of Clinton supporters are supporting Obama. That doesn’t mean they will all support McCain, but many of those I know are doing so.
Just from the comments tonight, I can tell you that McCain supporters – even before Hillary dropped out of the race – were far less hostile and hateful than the majority of Obama supporters. You hurt your candidate more than you help him.

Posted by: Traci | September 4, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Governor Palin needs to care for and raise her children first before this lifelong conservative Republican Mom will ever believe that Palin’s views match the speechwriter’s eloquent words Palin read off a teleprompter tonight.
I wanted Fred Thompson to become the GOP’s Presidential nominee and eventually accepted that I would vote for John McCain.
Since Senator McCain announced that Governor Palin was his running mate, I have been hoping to hear that Governor Palin had rejected Senator McCain’s offer.
Tonight I’m going to pray that Senator McCain finds a way to take Palin off the ticket and replace her with someone with more experience, a real Conservative who places family first over personal ambitions.

Posted by: ConservativeMom | September 4, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

Yes and Ryan C.was was John Edwards not speaking at the DNC convention? gee maybe because he cheated on his wife who was battling CANCER????
You Obama supporters are limp noodles.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Which brings me to making a suggestion for all those who are excited… channel it! Find your local GOP office and donate your time and energy. I’ve been given a reason to do it gleefully again with Palin.

Posted by: SkinnerVic | September 4, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

“Don’t mistake the speaker for the speechwriter.”
Posted by: Kate | Sep 4, 2008 12:06:18 AM
_____________________
How did Obama get into this conversation!
But while he’s in it, don’t mistake the candidate for the campaign manager!

Posted by: eyes opening... | September 4, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

“Long faces at CNN tonight, even Larry sounds down with his all Dem/Lib panel…wow, so far all 6 panelists bashing Reps.”
What a joke. CNN isn’t even attempting to hide their bias anymore. 6 stooges repeating the same tired talking points.

Posted by: Mack | September 4, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Nailed it !!!
Grand slam, outta the park !!!
Sarahcuda RAWKS DA HAY-OWZ !!!
But seriously. Fantastic delivery of an excellent speech that at times sounded…Reagan-esque !
And, our girl delivers the jabs with a stilleto blade, and a velvet glove…
No question that a star is born, not just for the conservative faithful, but for national politics in general…
MAALOX ALL AROUND FOR KEEFY, CHRIS TINGLE, AND ALL THE MSNBC/OBAMA PRO-BONO CAMPAIN OPERATIVES!!!

Posted by: RocketmanBob | September 4, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

eyes opening
Touche!
Isn’t wit better than common place insults and digs.

Posted by: Kate | September 4, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Obama should be worried about who Biden is going to vote for.

Posted by: Dusty | September 4, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Great pick, great speech.
My vision of America hopefully will last.

Posted by: Travis1 | September 4, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Davis:
So now it’s Hillary’s job to pound the little “hockey mom” into the dirt???????
Joe Biden is the Vice-Presidential candidate, not Hillary….
Remember????

Posted by: Lee | September 4, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Obama did say “Wa-silly”….put that in with bittergate….we know how he feels about small town Americans…he just doesn’t get it.
And yes, I heard even Hillary is voting for Palin!

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Huck, Rudy, & Sarah each hit home runs tonight.

Posted by: jgapinoy | September 4, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Legendary.
I am so proud…so honored, to be a part of history, watching this brave and stunning woman, giving this historic and legendary speech. It will be replayed again and again for years. She has broken down barriers for all of us, and has shown that no matter what background you come from, if you fight for what you believe in, you will go very far.
The great Martin Luther King would have been so proud to see this woman living out his “I have a dream”, with the content of her character succeeding over adversity.
Bravo, Governor Palin, bravo, and we are honored to have you as Vice President.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 4, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Did you here Larry King basically cut down the caller from Illinois who had a valid point about the guests bashing Palin for having her kids on stage but not treating Obama the same.
Sheer bias! What a shame.

Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 4, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

Very good speech! Well delivered. She enjoyed every minute of it. She was relaxed, comfortable as well.

Posted by: Weebork | September 4, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

She did just as I expected. Great speaker. Qualities of character — thoughts, words, feelings, actions, all apparently in sync. Friendly though deadly jabs at Obama. No weaknesses.

Posted by: Paul-Cincy | September 4, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

50% of Americans vote with emotions and 54% of the voters are female…think about it……..easy to switch from Hill to Gov. Palin….two straight shooters who will get the job done….and Hill is NOT the LIB Obama is….also doesn’t have terriorist, anti American, racist friends…that’s a deal breaker for me.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Great one liners and personal touch. Lots of generalities and partial inaccuracies. Good media exposure in prime time but lacking policy substance. Sorry – it only rates a C.

Posted by: NE Retiree | September 4, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Palin will bring the exact same partisan trenches to Washington. That’s not change, that’s more of the same.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

There’s always FoxNews for those whining about bias.
I’m sure you’ll find a very warm reception and uncritical praise for the Republicans there.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Its pathetic when Mccain start arguing he represents change. Well dont see that as a good speech but on attacks, they did a pretty good job. Did they energise the base? Yes. Will they get a bump in polls? Yes. But will they win the elections? No. Just presenting lies do not win elections. I look forward to the debates. Sarah Palin presented herself as one scary individual. i hope she is able to win independents.

Posted by: vuzous | September 4, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Listening to C SPAN, lot’s of NEW Independents (former Hillary supporters and Dems), they are in for Palin. Check it out. Many say they’re still Dems, but quite a few are for Palin and I, a long time Dem VOLUNTEER, not “pretending” either, believe the people who say they’ll vote McCain. Palin was great. Obama’s support in the media and on the blogs are IN TOTAL DENIAL. Worse, they all sound JEALOUS. I mean, it’s like BsO is the only one allowed to sell his (fake) image. BTW, she did speak issues, nevertheless, I was glued to the TV for her left right hooks on BO and she got awesome punches in.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

“Why would Sarah meet with the press prior to her speech? So they could bombard her with dailykos rumors? ”
Exactly. They haven’t written one positive story about her. It’s all trash and rumors.

Posted by: Mack | September 4, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

“Why would Sarah meet with the press prior to her speech”
Yeah why would she answer questions before being nominated to one of the two major parties Presidential ticket with the possibility of being the most powerful person on earth
Its not rocket science to be VP.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

for me it wasn’t about the speech-it was about the delivery, her passion, her ability to deliver after a week of being in the line of fire-she was totally composed apparently the lies, and rumors only strengthened her resolve.
by the way she speech writers are better than obamas.

Posted by: mae g | September 4, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

“Listening to C SPAN”
How is C SPAN’s coverage? Is it non-partisan?

Posted by: Mack | September 4, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

“it is not Rocket Science to be VP”
Which is why Obama thought HRC was over qualified for the position and chose Biden.

Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 4, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

On C Span the public was calling in. Palin’s speech is on now. Yeah sort of non bias, it’s regular voters’ comments. However, they do have some pundits once in a while. It’s mostly like public opinions on phone calls into the studio.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

Mush!
Yea that is what I thought.

Posted by: Thinking | September 4, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Yes, it’s obvious McCain has found his attack “barracuda,”
Now where’s Obama’s??
Too bad he didn’t pick Hillary, it would have been fabulous to have these two women going at it on a daily basis for the next two months…………

Posted by: Lee | September 4, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

Gov. Sarah Palin is already facing ethical questions over her firing of the Alaska public safety commissioner, and now she faces questions over the firing of a longtime local police chief.
After taking over as Mayor of the small town of Wasilla, Palin fired the longtime local police chief. The former police chief, Irl Stambaugh says he was fired because he stepped on the toes of Palin’s campaign contributors, including bar owners and the National Rifle Association.
Stambaugh’s lawyer, William Jermain, says the chief tried to move up the closing hours of local bars from 5 a.m. to two a.m. after a spurt of drunk driving accidents and arrests.
“His crackdown on that practice by the bars was not appreciated by her and that was one reason she terminated Irl,” said Jermain.”
hattip ABC

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

for me it wasn’t about the speech-it was about the delivery, her passion, her ability to deliver after a week of being in the line of fire-she was totally composed apparently the lies, and rumors only strengthened her resolve.
by the way she speech writers are better than obamas.
Posted by: mae g | Sep 4, 2008 1:45:34 AM
========================================
Your crazy… ROMNEY WAS THE BEST AND MOST POWERFUL SPEAKER AT YOUR CONVENTION TONIGHT!!
Man, I might have voted for that ticket if ROMNEY was on it!!!

Posted by: Daisy | September 4, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

i was looking forward to a possible hillary run in 2012-now that i see her competition it becomes, well more challenging. i still will always beleive that hillary was the best pick.
palen is incredible. i loved her family as well.
before tonight i was not sure and had really thought about just sitting the election this time ….
democrat in colorado who will support mccain/palen

Posted by: mae g | September 4, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Well, since nobody answered, let me rephrase the question differently:
What is Sarah Palin’s vision for getting America out of the current mess: internationally, economically, domestically?
Going on the attack? That’s all she has to offer?
Been there, done that. It doesn’t work.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

“It’s all trash and rumors. They haven’t written one positive thing about her.”
I think it’s the substantial reporting, not the rumors, that has Palin and the McCain camp worried and on the offensive. Like the investigation she’s presently under in her home state for the misuse use of her office as governor. Or the generous earmarks she acquired as both mayor and governor, which contradict her image as a reformer. There’s also news surfacing about minimal vetting of the McCain camp.

Posted by: kat | September 4, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

All the blogs have been heavy with traffic tonight. Guess that’s because the Palin speech is the hit of the evening. Good night. Bless all the decent people in the world whatever your politics!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Okay, even Olbermann admitted it was well-delivered, another guy said “a star is born..” you at least have to concede that it was a good speech. Still haven’t seen any evidence that anything she said was a “lie.”

Posted by: Wade | September 4, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Willem hopefully your questions will be answered during the debates. Yep, I am just getting to know Palin but I like what I see. When she does lay out her vision lets hope that she sticks to it unlike Obama who belives in Change…of views and flip flops

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

a reporter named Laura Mitchell Harris asks Palin about her intentions for a shake up. How would she effectively run a city without experienced leaders? “It’s not rocket science,” Palin said, “It’s $6 million and 53 employees.”
hattip huffpo

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

“I think it’s the substantial reporting, not the rumors, that has Palin and the McCain camp worried and on the offensive. Like the investigation she’s presently under in her home state for the misuse use of her office as governor. Or the generous earmarks she acquired as both mayor and governor, which contradict her image as a reformer. There’s also news surfacing about minimal vetting of the McCain camp.”
Like I said, no positive pieces. I’ve been hearing and reading the same Democratic talking points. Do they send you text messages with your daily talking points? It really turns people off. She has a very high approval rating in her state, so why no report on the positive impact that she has had on her state.

Posted by: Mack | September 4, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

“..She would get pasted on Meet the Press or any other Sunday Morning talk show….”
Yeah right….just like everybody thought she wouldn’t be able to pull tonight off after all of the media frenzy of the last two days…….
This lady is anybody’s toe-to-toe match, and I have a feeling we’re going to be seeing a lot more of her……..
Look for big lines and crowds of people to start flocking to McCain/Palin events like they did for Obama.
Sans the Greek columns, of course (that was my favorite line of her speech….I almost fell out of my chair on that one)

Posted by: Lee | September 4, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

I am rewatching the convention. I also liked Huckabees statement about “indifference to Obama’s race”. His race should be a non issue but Obama beats it to death.

Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 4, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

irma; yeah everyone i know is real turned off by cnn and saying after this election they will turn it off all together over the top biased…but your right c span is a good option. i’m tired of the msn trying to influence my vote.
democrat for mccain/palen

Posted by: mae g | September 4, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

That speech unsettled me more and more as it went on. Insulting community workers? Not a good way to endear yourself.
And I find it fascinating that the vibe I got — of a mean high school girl who’s head of a clique — was echoed back at me after the speech by friends. The sneer, the sibilant hiss through clenched teeth when she’s making a sarcastic point. Palin struck me as nasty and snide, and incredibly insulting. Attack dog, sure, but she really went all-out for someone who’s had NO national profile. I wasn’t impressed. She came across as a flippant jerk.
We’ll see how she shakes out — the media’s only been vetting her for a few days, and there are tons of stories coming out of Alaska.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

“That speech unsettled me more and more as it went on. Insulting community workers? ”
Try not to spin too much. I believe it was Barry that initially put down her mayoral experience. She just put him in his place.

Posted by: Mack | September 4, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Daisy….twice you’ve said it should have been Mitt, and I heard his speech tonight and it wasn’t nearly as personal and connective as Rudy and Gov. Palin’s….as a matter of fact, I and many McCain supporters wanted Romney for the safe choice, but the Maverick was right on this CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN….AND IT’S GOV. SARAH PALIN!

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

I read your post mae g. Take care and good night. I hope you’re as happy as I am tonight. At least I felt good hearing a tough, smart woman sock it to BO.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 2:06 am 2:06 am

No positive pieces?
You don’t find the accounts of her speech tonight on the ABC website positive, or at least balanced?

Posted by: kat | September 4, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Lee anyone can read from a teleprompter. Most people had no doubt she’d do fine tonight. Heck, all she had to do was show up and not pee her pants and the evening would be considered a success. If she’s so great why not give the media access to her out of the gate? Every VP nominee I can remember both Dem and Repub had to make various appearences or at least be available for interviews. And spare this line that the media is mean to her crap – none of you Republicans thought the media was unfair when it was Rev Wright 24/7 did you?

Posted by: freedomfighter1975 | September 4, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Grace you sound like an insecure wall flower who got passed over at the school dance. What’s wrong didn’t make the cheer leading squad? I lived in Chicago. Obama’s time as a “community worker” is questionable and consisted of him visiting housing projects here and there. Community work in Chicago was Bobby Rush, Harold Washington Danny Kaye davis, Carol Mosley Braun, Timuel Black, Alice Palmer. Obama was nothing until Alice Palmer helped him and then he stabbed her in the back by taking her senate seat.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

“No positive pieces?
You don’t find the accounts of her speech tonight on the ABC website positive, or at least balanced?”
Yes, you are right. Tonight there is some positive pieces about her speech. Could they really say otherwise? All day long though the stories were all trashing her. You have to dig to find the information that you are looking for. If I relied on CNN, MSNBC, ABC etc. All I would know about her is that she had her trooper brother-in-law fired, Her daughter is pregnant, and something about the bridge to nowhere. It was nice to listen to her tonight, because she had the opportunity to speak about her background and experience.

Posted by: Mack | September 4, 2008, 2:12 am 2:12 am

She was only commenting on one particular community organizer who felt that experience qualified them to be President.
I don’t know of any other community organizers who felt qualified to make that leap.
And it’s true, those Obama supporters and Democratic pundits have been ridiculing her all week, saying that her mayorial experience does not qualify her for Vice-President, but his community organizing credentials qualify him for the presidency!!
Those Democratic commentators on CNN had to find something to throw back at her, and that was the best they could do, to insinuate that she was insulting every community organizer on the planet.
This woman just came at them out of left field with no advance warning, and they are grasping at straws trying to deal with her and they can’t.
And they thought Hillary was the woman they had to worry about…………..

Posted by: Lee | September 4, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

Ryan is a patronizing democrat that is also a redneck. People like him make me doubt my allegiance to the democrats. They disappointed me when Dukakis was the nominee, again when Gore lost, Kerry was ineffective, and now this snobby elitist “man of change”. The DNC is truly disappointing to me and the followers make me wretch. ”
Samnatha before you regaled us with tales of Repulbicans and African Americans and Repulbicans and woman’s siffrage. Now you’re claiming allegiance to the Democrats?
Phony…thru & thru

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

“Being mayor is like being a community organizer but with responsibilities”
No distinction, just a tone deaf Republican.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

“Wow. DNC, RNC, Berlin, Paris. London – SP would rock-the-house. I would pay money to see SP & BO “debate” in the mode of Lincoln – Douglas. And I know that BO has delivered when the buildup/ pressure was on. But he has never had to do so after an onslaught like SP has endured. I am at a loss to think of another recent example like this – where the person under-the-gun delivered like SP did tonight. And there may be an example of someone doing the same – but no one in the modern era has ever done it better. Historic, simply historic. She – um’ he – has my vote.
Posted by: lucky | Sep 4, 2008 12:05:04 AM”
yeah bush’s speechwriter (literally) delivered. i’m still very uncomfortable with her since she has yet to make any statements off the cuff/unscripted since her first appearance on friday except for an interview with people magazine.
and about delivering under pressure how about barack and reverend wright? and with that speech there was actual substance and not just attacks. really, do you have a better sense of what palin would do as a vice president? do you feel more confident in her ability to lead the free world?

Posted by: phi | September 4, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Mack, she’s been a part-time mayor of a small town. She’s also been a 20-month governor in a state that’s not had a deficit in its history, due to oil revenue. The 47th largest state by population, in fact. Querying those figures is legit when it’s being fluffed up to balance a lack of national profile and a whistling silence on foreign policy.
As is Palin saying something about how community organizers have small budgets and no staff, sure. But she didn’t do that — she mocked community organizers. Which makes her look petty.
As for putting Obama in his place? We’ll see how she road-tests. Tonight she delivered a speech written by someone else, deftly avoiding all trouble spots and to a friendly crowd. This was an introduction. When she’s across from Biden and journalists and an open audience, THEN I’ll assess. At the moment, all we’ve got are the scraps the media have dug up and the “facts” she’s put out there about herself.
It does not make me feel good to know she received her mayoral post with a surplus, and left millions of dollars in debt. It does not make me admire her that she tried to fire the local librarian for refusing to ban books. I don’t care about the Jews for JEsus thing, except to be amused that there’s now another “crazy preacher” in the mix. And lastly — she’s in the middle of an ethics investigation, with taped phone calls and emails to back up allegations, where she and her family hounded the police commissioner to fire her ex-brother-in-law.
And I’ve only known the woman for five days.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

“Lee anyone can read from a teleprompter….”
Yes, and for some candidates in this election, that’s ALL they can do……………………

Posted by: Lee | September 4, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Ryan unlike you I can be a democrat and vote outside of my party and also realize that there are minorities that are not democrats. You are one of those sad individuals that really need Obama to win so you can feel like a better person.
I am a Democrat but i refuse to vote for a status quo snob fake organizer who belongs to Trinity and cannot stand behind any ideas without changing his opinion to get the vote. he did not get my vote in the Primary. He will not in the general. After seeing Palin tonight. I am comfortable voting for Mccain.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

PRINCETON, NJ — The Democratic convention appears to have helped solidify support for Barack Obama among former Hillary Clinton supporters, with the percent saying they will vote for Obama in November moving from 70% pre-convention to 81% after the convention, and the percent certain to vote for Obama jumping from 47% to 65%.
hattip Gallup

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

closing thought i guess you guys just lost the ‘mccain having bad judgement argument’ this woman is incredible. i now understand why he did not choose romney he was a total flop.
good night……..
democrat in colorado who will vote for mcain/pale

Posted by: mae g | September 4, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

Samantha — I didn’t even know they were called “cheer squads”. Bizarre.
You’re talking like this is a random community organizer who one day decided to run for president. He’s a community organizer who decided to run for State Senate, and served there for eight years while teaching Constitutional Law. And then served in the national Senate. And then ran for president for 20 months: the exact amount of time Palin’s been in executive office in Alaska. He’s got a bigger operation, a bigger staff, and no reassuring flow of state oil money. He’s also gotten 18 million people to vote for him.
Trying to boil that down to something that can be trumped by a 9k-town mayorship and under two years of state office (resulting in an ethics investigation) is insane. Just because the Republicans have found it expedient to declare a certain form of elected office “invalid” doesn’t mean it actually doesn’t count.
I’m not saying she can’t hack it, but I am saying that a state senator does not equate to mayor, and Senator for 4 years does not get sunk under 20 months as governor. Not to mention to national political organization. The entire argument’s ludicrous.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Ryan c. master of cutting and pasting.
In reality, that program failed miserably and Obama never really did anything challenging in Chicago. Like his inspiration Saul Alinsky, Obama only knows how to only support programs from the outside. Hillary wrote her thesis on Alinsky in undergrad but later when campaigning against BO commented on how ineffective the school of thought could be. BO supported the Chicago community behind the scenes and only eventually came out publicly on their behalf when it benefited his elections .

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

New CNN Time polls are out for a few swing states.
OH: Obama 47 McCain 45
MN: Obama 53 McCain 41
IA: Obama 55 McCain 40
Up 15 in IOWA!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Noticed alot of folks on CNN constantly want to focus on “Mayor” and not “Gov.” Palin. Thank God, Mayor Rudy came out and did a great job as did GOV. PALIN.
As for exposure to press, Biden and Bozo went out together after his uneventful announcement and made some appearances before Biden ever spoke to press…lay off for a few days and let them do their thing. She’ll be going out alone next Monday after 3 days of criss crossing country with McCain.
As a poster said below….I want to see Gov. Palin debate Obama….she’d have Obama wearing the lipstick!

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 2:29 am 2:29 am

Ryan..community organizer who got some asbestos removed from some buildings….wow…that IS impressive.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

Obama, who? Biden, who? Way to go, Sarah!!

Posted by: Christie | September 4, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Belittling someone for trying to improve their community, succeed or fail, is a glaring example of what’s wrong with the right wing.
Your comments on Alinsky betray you

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

“Ryan..community organizer who got some asbestos removed from some buildings….wow…that IS impressive.”
Great Post Debra!

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am

Ryan..community organizer who got some asbestos removed from some buildings….wow…that IS impressive.”
For a guy in his mid 20′s, I would say it was impressive.
At the same age, Palin was trying to get on TV as a sportcaster….impressive

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Well Obama should relate to this great speech tonight…didn’t Hillary say she and McCain had years of experience to bring to the WH, and Obama had a speech he gave in 2004? Yeah that’s it, and Biden chimed in with his response to Stephanopolos question if BO was ready to be Pres and Biden emphatically said “NO”…..because what he really thinks is that BO is “clean and articulate for an African American….storybook stuff”.
Gotta love those film clips we’ve seen in their own words.
HILL SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 2:43 am 2:43 am

And Samantha, I take it that you’re one of those who keeps talking about “Kool-Aid” like it actually means something.
Forget Obama for a moment, then (anyone who starts chirping “Kool-Aid” is determined to dismiss anything they don’t like, I find). Let’s talk Palin and McCain.
You know what scares the hell out of me? They’re both anti-choice. Palin’s family situation has unfortunately brought this to the fore, though it would’ve popped up anyhow due to the fact that something like 40% of McCain’s female Independent supporters believe he’s something of a choice maverick. He is not.
McCain wants to ban abortion, by amendment or by Supreme Court nomination. Palin is beloved by conservatives because she’s not only anti-choice, but she’s anti-sex ed and believes Creationism should be taught in science class.
When the Palins put out a statement earlier in the week, they said they were proud of their daughter’s “decision”. That means “choice”. I also honor their daughter’s choice, but if I vote in Palin and McCain, I do so knowing that they want to STRIP that right from MY daughters. I want my daughters to have the exact same right that Palin’s did — choice.
Any woman who values or believes in choice, who then turns around and votes in McCain/Palin, should know what she’s getting into. People tell you who they are, you just have to listen. McCain and Palin are very, very loudly telling us what we’ll get if we put them in office, and those Supreme appointments will last for DECADES. So even if McCain/Palin were booted in 4 years, the Supremes stay, and the anti-abortion activists (who I really wish would start focusing on pregnancy prevention already — go to the source, dammit!) have decades to work on overturning Roe v. Wade.
In this case, I find the Democratic ticket appealing, so I’m good with voting for them. But while the Republican platform is so anti-choice, and both candidates rabidly so, I am not even flirting with giving them my vote.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

So when is Palin going to talk to the press?
McCain finally came out of hiding to get interviewed tonite.
During which he states that proximity to Russia and her command of the AKNG gives her national security experience.
to wit:
“However, the governor has no command authority overseas or anywhere in the United States other than Alaska, said Maj. Gen. Craig Campbell, the service commander of the Alaska National Guard.
“When members of the National Guard are federalized, they work for the president,” Campbell said Wednesday. “It’s not just overseas. They could be federalized to go to other states or they could even be federalized in the state.”
Occasions in which Palin retains command authority over the 4,200-member Alaska National Guard are whenever the Guard responds to in-state natural disasters and civic emergencies, said Campbell, who also serves as the commissioner of the state Department of Military and Veterans Affairs.
Some examples?
“We’ve deployed individuals in state service all over the state under Sarah Palin,” he said. “We had defense men down in Seward for the (Mount) Marathon run doing security.
“Out west and northwest we had erosion problems, and the National Guard was involved in some of the protection out there. About three days ago, the Army National Guard picked up a lady from Little Diomede (Island) . . . at the request of state troopers.”
Did Palin directly approve each of those activities?
No, Campbell said. The governor has granted him the authority to act on his own in most cases, including life-or-death emergencies — when a quick response is required — and minor day-to-day operations.
“Some authorities have been given to me that she has acknowledged that I can execute,” he said. “For others I have to ask her each time.”
The recent decision to deploy a C-17 cargo plane from the Alaska Air National Guard to Louisiana to assist during the Hurricane Gustav response was an occasion in which Campbell briefed the governor’s office and sought its approval, he said. Chief of Staff Mike Nizich signed off on it.”
hattip McClatchy

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

Grace I’ve got news for you. The abortion issue is NOT an issue for me. Move on sister. Got something else in your bag of tricks? Yeah didn’t think so.
Roe V. wade will be overturned wow scary. Next.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Grace, I saw a Hill supporter like myself who is pro choice and we respect Gov. Palin’s choice and this is not an issue because we will never turn back the hands of time to 1974….not in this sexualized culture. We will always have choice (and I believe McCain is really pro choice anyway). This is not the deal breaker for most voters.
For me, it’s Obama’s radical lib terriorist, racist, Anti-American friends…..not an option…more off putting than his lack of experience.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Samantha, if you’re still reliving hurt feelings in Chicago politics from the 80s, you are going to LOVE Palin’s crusades in Alaska from the early 90s. She’s left a trail of furious contemporaries — she’s got a loyalty test that’s killer, and most politicians in Alaska feel she got where she was by biting the hands that helped her.
Just wait for this stuff to start rolling in — you’ll be able to relive the 90s too!

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Grace….Gov. Palin has an 80% approval rating in her state…most popular Gov. in the country…..great pick McCain!

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

hooray, concerned in Oh is back!!! I missed you. The only sane ones are Debra and I.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am

Anybody remember when Biden cried with tissue in his hands a couple of days after he was announced? Man, if Gov. Palin shows any emotion she will be villified. Such double standards. I pray for her daily and Sen. McCain….can’t wait to go to my local McCAIN/PALIN offices and get my yard signs and volunteer as many days as they need me.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

This election is over.
The handsome Palin family will look great in that VP mansion. :)

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

Debra,
She’s been Governor for 20 months, I’d wait a little to see if that approval rating can be sustained. The ethics investigation’s sure to ding it. Not to mention, this is the state that keeps electing Ted Stevens, who may do fantastic things for Alaska but has sort of screwed over the rest of the union with earmarks.
That said — I thought a major McCain campaign angle was that popularity’s overrated?

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

‘The speech, well crafted and largely written by former Bush White House speechwriter Matt Scully, was effective.’ These weren’t even her words, so who cares? She is a flake. She didn’t say anything except for repeating the republican mantras (lies).

Posted by: Bush in training | September 4, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

Me too Debra! We’re fired up! I can’t believe the difference in enthusiasm even I felt in just a week’s time. Like night and day!

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

Bush in training is worried sick. As he should be. Lol.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

You know, we saw a lot today, but there was one thing we didn’t see…
A TELEPROMPTER!”
Actually MSNBC showed a couple of angles where you could read the prompter along with the speaker.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

The left is running scared. I’ve been reading leftwing blog comments and they’re glum.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

Everyone uses a teleprompter and everyone has speech writers. Nice try though.
Delivery is 3/4 of the speech anyway, and Palin rocked that.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:11 am 3:11 am

She can read well scripted speech.
But i’m really looking forward to seeing her talk to media on her own.
I think many republican must be anxious what words are coming out from her mouth.
She is giving us so much fun last five days even she was hiding in her hotel room.

Posted by: zen | September 4, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

Interesting that Ryan C, berates Sarah Palin for using a teleprompter when Obama is known as the “teleprompter candidate” Obama is a mediocre speaker in unscripted events like debates. It showed when Hillary kicked his butt.
Ryan has grasped at so many straws that he could open a soda shop.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

“and I believe McCain is really pro choice anyway”
Interesting considering McCain’s own website blares loud and clear that he wants to overturn Roe v Wade.
Overturning Roe v. Wade
John McCain believes Roe v. Wade is a flawed decision that must be overturned, and as president he will nominate judges who understand that courts should not be in the business of legislating from the bench.
Constitutional balance would be restored by the reversal of Roe v. Wade, returning the abortion question to the individual states. The difficult issue of abortion should not be decided by judicial fiat.
However, the reversal of Roe v. Wade represents only one step in the long path toward ending abortion. Once the question is returned to the states, the fight for life will be one of courage and compassion – the courage of a pregnant mother to bring her child into the world and the compassion of civil society to meet her needs and those of her newborn baby. The pro-life movement has done tremendous work in building and reinforcing the infrastructure of civil society by strengthening faith-based, community, and neighborhood organizations that provide critical services to pregnant mothers in need. This work must continue and government must find new ways to empower and strengthen these armies of compassion. These important groups can help build the consensus necessary to end abortion at the state level. As John McCain has publicly noted, “At its core, abortion is a human tragedy. To effect meaningful change, we must engage the debate at a human level.”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

zen, no worries,
I saw her on CNBC recently with Maria Bartarono?(spelling?) and she was talking about energy and she was awesome. Perfect. An energy expert.
Very impressive. You’ll see.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

Interesting that Ryan C, berates Sarah Palin for using a teleprompter”
Berate? I made a comment about a phony story the McCain campaign was floating about a faulty telepromtpr.
I then made a comment that telepromters were used when Concerned claimed they were not.
At no time did I berate her for usong a telepromtper. Just another lie from yourself

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

As we all should be the woman is not prepared to be president. She is still being vetted. Nobody knows her. She has secessionist ties. She holds radical world views including that mankind has nothing to do with global warming, is anti-choice, advocates teaching creationism as science (gag), against endangered species protections, has two investigations going on concerning abuse of power, and she has already lied about her aversion to earmarks as she succeeded in securing more for Alaska than any other state. Yes, we should all be afraid that McCain has jeopardized our country by nominating this neophyte. For whatever you think about Obama, he has been vetted and the American people have had a chance to know him and judge him for the last year. I’m no McCain and don’t declare someone a ‘soulmate’ after a single meeting. He and Palin have turned this race into a mockery of a great tradition. Think of your nearest one horse town, does being a mayor there qualify anyone for VP or in the worst case president. Not at all. Her governorship is similar as Alaska is the 47th most populace state in the nation.

Posted by: Bush in training | September 4, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

McCain can’t overturn Roe v Wade. Judges would have to do that.
And then it would go to the states anyway.
And I’m not willing to give this country over to a novice do nothing just over the abortion issue.
These are dangerous times. Stop your obsession over abortion.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Bozo is going to try and tie the Maverick McCain to Bush and everyone knows they have had numerous fights and disagreements over the years….but this is their only chance. And it will fail with Gov. Palin as much a Maverick or maybe more than McCan….she is the CHANGE I can believe in and not a Washington Insider. She is in touch with real Americans and not just the cosmopolitan that B. Hussein is.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

She talked very little about anything of substance and focused instead on telling jokes. Is she trying out for last comic standing, or VP of the US?

Posted by: Was it a standup routine | September 4, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

Concerned full of it as usual
From your link

“Was [Obama] involved in stuff? Absolutely,” said Robert Ginsburg, an activist who worked in Altgeld with Johnson and Obama. “But there was stuff happening before him, and after him.”
No one disputes that Obama was active in organizing Altgeld residents. Several who worked directly with him say he was the most effective organizer they had seen — a surprise, given his youth. “He was our motivator,” said Callie Smith, now 50. “We did all the work, but he was our inspiration.”"

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

As a Deomocrat…it pains me to have to support Mccain/Palin but with the way half of the democratic party was treated by Obamas many operatives that serve no purpose…. I am more likely than not to vote for Mccain over Obama… he needs to be sent a message that he deserved what he got in his family life and there are others like the palins that can be dealt harsh circumstances and deal with it with Grace!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Ryan, I thought that teleprompter thing was out of the blue, too. I didn’t notice an issue, and having both read off of and controlled one of the infernal machines, it’s just such a weird thing to hype. It’s like saying “He was walking out to the podium, and a spotlight blinded him for a second, but then he was okay.”
It seems like something an overexcited PR flak made up on the spot, wanting to make the speech Even! More! Amazing! “I took a sip of water and it went down the wrong pipe, but then it was okay”. Totally weird.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

Nope not with Puma.
Not with Obama.
Was for Hillary
Now for:
McCain/Palin

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am

Bush In Training
We will not rely on the media to vett Palin… this is the crowd that denograted Hillarys acheivments and elevated a nobody to mythical stature… it wasnt right and they will gert whats coming to them!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

Samantha…I’m with you…..not a Puma, was a Hill supporter, never an Obot, and thrilled to be a McCain/Palin supporter and contributor. Will work for them with enthusiasm.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Grace,
The truth matters very little to the right wing.
Things are looking good for Obama but there are 60 days left. The Palin Pinata party has just started.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

The whole world is in love with the Palin family. God bless America!

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

The whole world is in love with the Palin family. God bless America!

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Actually Obama is starting to feel like yesterdays news.
This guy STILL can’t crack the numbers that even the dullard Kerry had by this time 4 years ago.
And even with the unprecedented fawning by the adoring liberal media. The guy is a fraud and Americans are waking up.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

I LOVED how Gov. Palin never used Obama’s name and called him “our opponent”….loved not having to hear his hideous name. Geeze I’m watching a re-run and it’s just as good as the first time…..her speech. I’m entranced and feel like I’m cheating on Hillary…but only for a second.
McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am

People have a reason now to vote against Obama/Biden.
After hearing McCain and Palin, you realize there is no THERE there with Obama. An empty suit is the perfect description. Obama dreams of doing the reforms and things that Palin has accomplished. But I doubt the good ole corrupt boys of Chicago will never let him.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Ryan C
Obama will not win.. he lost it the day after his acceptance speeech… IM sure those collums will appear in numerous commercials… Palins speech was much more effective than Obamas speech…. Biden was beyond boring!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:30 am 3:30 am

Ryan C,
By “upset many Alaskans” they mean the Alaskans that had a vested interested in gaining from the bridge AND from the people that Palin drove out of power from corruption.
So please. You fool no one. Try something else. Lol.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am

I get bored easily with speeches and I was on the edge of my seat. With Rudy’s also.
We scored a victory tonight! And on Nov 4th.

Posted by: Go Sarah | September 4, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

Go sarah
yep the Daley machine is the sole reason Obama is a US Senator and a candidate for president! They think they can influence history but will be relegated to it!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

I loved her comment on the journey to the white house is not meant to be one of “personal discovery”. Loved it.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Ryan, I’m not worried about this stuff. The thing is, people still haven’t learned the lesson of the primaries — electoral college and state polls are everything, national polls are nothing. If you look at the state polls, we’re doing just fine.
I think Palin will have hurt herself with a fair handful of people during this speech. She’s a total unknown, who was presented to the public and immediately followed by a number of high-profile scandals in the media. She’s just given a speech that will have turned some right off her. She said nothing about her policies, she was all canned attack.
She’s certainly someone to watch out for, but we’ll see. She might prove to be a total natural and take to debate like a fish to water. Either way, when you put her debut aside, you get a Republican convention that was simultaneously amping itself and drubbing itself. It was like watching siamese twins fight, totally bizarre.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

Jo Stewart:
“The issue of the teen pregnancy
They have said this is Bristol’s decision and we should honor that.
I have a daughter.
The reason I think its fair game is Gov Pailn is on record as saying she would veto abortions for women even in the case of rape.
So what she [Gov Palin] is essence saying respect my family’s ability to make this decision and elect me to so that I can keep your family from having that same opportunity.
He then handed Newt’s head to him.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

Gosh Grace she sounds like OBAMA!!!!! A few scandals (Rezko, Sinclair, Wright)
LOL

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

Go Sarah,
Palin kept the money meant for the bridge. That’s her fighting outrageous earmarks!
Palin is a fraud.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:40 am 3:40 am

Debra, some of this stuff is so tired, I can only imagine you’re willfully ignoring what actually happened because it doesn’t suit your narrative.
Obama’s campaign sent out the text at around 3 am because CNN was reporting the Biden pick as fact. Obama’s team had told texters that they’d be the first to know, and so to make good on that promise, they sent the text. CNN tentatively floated Biden at midnight, then confirmed at something like 1:30. After that, to keep their promise, Obama’s team sent out the text. It arrived in inboxes between 3 am and 11am (I got mine at 430)
Go back and check log times if you’d like — but imagining slams to Hillary is ridiculous.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 3:42 am 3:42 am

Samantha
yea you dont run for president to find yourself…. Obama is the one who is the fraud… we all knew it and predicted it months ago… it will be palin vs Clinton in 2012

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am

HA! Samantha, you’re someone who believes SINCLAIR?! That explains a hell of a lot! Ha ha ha…
Wright has no significance to me, I’ve heard that sort of preaching before and think all religion is crazy anyhow. Rezko, eh — reporters have been crawling over it for months now with no result. Stupid move, but seems above-board.
Of course, you’re mentioning scandals dug up over 20 months of campaigning. Palin? Her stuff is being unearthed in DAYS. Again, we’ll see how it shakes out, but her rounds of intimidation and firings are not looking good from the start.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am

Grace
in other words Obamas people were stretching the truth to their own supporters…this has been the most shameless campaign of any I can remember…Obama cannot continue to promote those mindless young people that are supporting obama without lookign at facts

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

Grace
you just indicted yourself… saying that religion is crazy…. it was Obama who said that middle class people cling to guns and religion and have antipathy for people who arent liek them… that will bit him again and again… though there is not much there there to “bite”

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am

Obam’s lengthy rebuttal is out.
Just one snip
PALIN: “It was the spirit that brought me to the governor’s office, when I took on the old politics as usual in Juneau … when I stood up to the special interests, the lobbyists, big oil companies, and the good-ol’ boys network.”
REALITY: PALIN HAS A LT. GOVERNOR WHO IS A FORMER OIL LOBBYIST, HIRED
WASILLA’S FIRST FEDERAL LOBBYIST (A FORMER STEVENS STAFFER) & HAD THE
SUPPORT OF ENTRENCHED ALASKA POLITICIANS DURING HER 2006 RACE.
Palin’s Oil & Gas Appointee Is Former Lobbyist for TransCanada. “Marty Rutherford, who leads Gov. Sarah Palin’s gas pipeline team, made $40,200 in 2003 while consulting in Juneau for a pipeline subsidiary of TransCanada. TransCanada is one of the companies bidding for a state license to build a pipeline to carry gas to market from Alaska’s North Slope. It’s not a disqualifier, but the past connection deserves a second thought.” [Anchorage Daily News editorial, 12/15/07]
Palin “Counting on Her Lieutenant Governor Candidate… Former Oil Lobbyist” to Help Win Oil Industry Support. “The defiantly grass-roots nature of the campaign may have distanced her from certain traditional centers of power in Alaska. The oil industry is one — but the
campaign says it is counting on her lieutenant governor candidate, Parnell, a former oil lobbyist and legislator, to help there.” [Anchorage Daily News, 10/24/06]
Palin’s Former Chief of Staff is Stevens’ Campaign Manager. “Monegan says pressure came from those around Palin, including former Palin chief-of-staff Mike Tibbles, Department of Administration Commissioner Annette Kreitzer, and director of boards and commissions Frank Bailey. Tibbles, who is now the campaign manager for Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, said Friday he couldn’t comment on whether he spoke to Monegan about Wooten.” [Anchorage Daily, 7/19/08]
As Mayor, Palin Hired a Washington Lobbyist to Help Get Earmarks for Wasilla – Lobbyist Was Former Chief of Staff for Indicted Senator Ted Stevens. “And as mayor of the small town of Wasilla from 1996 to 2002, Palin also hired a Washington lobbying firm that helped secure $8 million in congressionally directed spending projects, known as earmarks, according to public spending records compiled by the watchdog group Citizens Against Government Waste and lobbying documents. Wasilla’s lobbying firm was headed by Steven Silver — a former chief of staff to Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens, a key proponent of the bridge project.” [USA Today, 8/31/08]
The Usual Alaska Suspects – Ted Stevens, Don Young, And Lisa Murkowski Fundraised For Palin. “Will we see Ted Stevens stumping for Sarah Palin? Palin said this morning that Stevens appeared at a fund-raiser for her in Ketchikan and gave a speech about ‘moving Alaska forward.’ But does that mean he’ll pop up in any advertisements? (Remember his arguably pivotal role at the end of the Knowles and Murkowski Senate race?) Palin said she doubts it and hasn’t asked… She said Don Young came to one of her fund-raisers two days ago, and she expects Lisa Murkowski at an upcoming event. Tonight she planned to talk with John Binkley, who she says is writing a letter to his supporters on her behalf, and she planned to meet with Frank Murkowski tomorrow morning.” [“The Trail” blog, Anchorage Daily News, 10/13/06]
In Her 2002 Campaign for Lieutenant Governor, Palin Raised ‘About 10 Percent Of Her Campaign Fund’ From Veco, An Oil Company At the Heart of Federal Investigation. “While mayor of Wasilla, Palin ran for lieutenant governor in 2002. She gathered $5,000 — or about 10
percent of her campaign fund — from Veco officials or their wives along the way.” [Anchorage Daily News, 9/6/06]
If people thought the Obama campaign was going to be cowed by the McCain campaign insincere calls of sexism, they were wrong.
Palin is going to be exposed for the fraud she is.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:51 am 3:51 am

The earmarks thing — Palin hired a lobbyist for Wasilla, specifically to bring pork IN. And that lovely bridge she’s so addled about only died a slow and horrible death when she found out that the feds were slashing funding, meaning Alaskans would have to pay about 200 million of its cost.
Suddenly, that bridge didn’t seem so important anymore. How did her constituents find out? 4 am press release (since we’re so fond of AM slights today). And now those same constituents find out that she fought against the bridge they so clearly remember her fighting FOR.
Mind you, she still built the road to the nonexistent bridge — that funding was untouched. So now there’s a road from nowhere to a beach.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

Sam thanks for the laugh about “Daisy’s Petals”…..it’s 12:46 here in Los Angeles….excited to see closing night for Rep. Convention and then to watch McCain/Palin go to 3 or 4 states over the next three days. Can’t wait to watch the news again….something to engage in again since Hill dropped out….(aside from McCain)….Gov. Palin. Hey does anybody know what happend to the bio/film that was supposed to run on Sarah Palin, narrated by Jon Voight? It was supposed to play BEFORE her speech and I know they were running late.
Hope they air it tomorrow.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 3:52 am 3:52 am

I’m curious how the content of this speech went over for Indepedents.
Also whether Independents found her at all Presidential…

Posted by: Danny | September 4, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Ryan is showing the weakness of the Obamabots.
He is showing that they are afraid and will say anything to discredit anyone who threatens the CHOSEN ONE.
My mother had a baby at 15. She was raped at 19 and kept the child. There were ways she could have gotten rid of it but she did not. The child’s father was incarcerated and she gave up the child for adopted. You know who adopted it. The family of the rapist. They were good people who condemned their son’s actions and admired my mother for going through with the pregnancy. That boy came to my mothers funeral and thanked her for keeping him. He is one of the only black attorneys in his firm in Grand Rapids.
In 1970′s my mother was pregnant again with me. She made an appointment for an abortion but decided the morning of that I would be a girl who would grow into a successful black woman. I did and I am the first woman my family to have a Phd and a law degree.
She said she looked in the mirror and thought “two wrongs don’t make a right”.
Thank you mom. Rest in peace.
We do not condone abortion. Woman have always had a choice. It was just not legal. Roe v. Wade will not be overturned. I have voted for DEMS when I am pro life. Now I will vote for McCain.

Posted by: Samantha | September 4, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

PALIN: “I understand that we must reduce our dependence on foreign energy. I’ve worked with our state’s energy producers to expand our production so that we can have a safe, reliable supply of energy produced here in the United States.”
REALITY: PALIN SUPPORTED EXPORTING NATURAL GAS WHILE ALASKA BUSINESSES
CLOSED BECAUSE OF SHORTAGES
Palin Backed A Two-Year Extension Of The Export License To Export Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) To Japan And Other Asian Countries— Criticized Because Alaska’s Gas Reserves Are Declining. “Alaska producers can continue shipping gas to Asia after DOE last week approved an extension of the export license for the Kenai liquefied natural gas plant owned by ConocoPhillips and Marathon. The companies will be allowed to export up to 98.1 Bcf to Japan and other Pacific Rim countries over a two-year period through March 31, 2011. […] The
application came under fire from local end-users, including gas distribution companies Enstar and the Chugach Electric Association, as well as fertilizer maker Agrium, all of which claimed the exports would exacerbate the problem of declining gas reserves in south-central Alaska. Agrium permanently closed its plant near Kenai due to an inability to find enough local supply for the facility that used 53 Bcf/year. In January, ConocoPhillips and Marathon reached a deal in which they agreed to step up development in the Cook Inlet region in return for the state’s support of the export license extension. The producers also agreed to divert gas from the LNG plant as needed to meet the peak winter supply needs of the local utilities. […] Alaska Governor Sarah Palin welcomed the DOE approval. “In these times of economic uncertainty, this is great news for the state and its residents. This extension will secure a future for the LNG operation and is another step toward ensuring energy supplies and energy security for Alaska,” the Republican Governor said. [Platts Inside FERC, 6/9/08]
Press Release, 6/26/06]
· Agrium Closed Manufacturing Plant Because Of Gas Shortage. “Reserves of gas in producing fields in Southcentral Alaska aredeclining, posing concerns for supply to local utilities. Amanufacturing plant on the Kenai Peninsula owned by Agrium Corp.recently announced it would close because the gas shortage.” [AlaskaJournal Of Commerce, 11/25/07]
· Gov. Palin: Agrium Closure Is Unfortunate. “Agrium announcedyesterday that the plant will close in December due to a shortage inthe supply of Cook Inlet natural gas, leaving about 100 of the 140employees without employment. ‘It’s unfortunate to see the closure ofa facility that has provided so many jobs that support families on thePeninsula,’ said Governor Palin. ‘I am heartened to hear that Agriumis willing to keep its options open if sufficient long-term suppliesof gas can be found. We know there is more gas to be found anddeveloped in Cook Inlet, so I remain hopeful that those jobs can bepreserved.’” [Palin press release, 9/26/07]

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

Ryan
Just leave… noobody cares anymore about your precious Obama give it up !

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:56 am 3:56 am

I used to think this election was going to be generational, and I now think it will be gender that decides the outcome.
Obama who? Gov. Palin was a Maverick kind of choice….Romney (who public wanted) would have been the biggest snore.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 3:57 am 3:57 am

More Obama rebuttal…very thorough
Just google it
PALIN: “Starting in January, in a McCain-Palin administration, we’regoing to lay more pipelines … build more new-clear plants … createjobs with clean coal … and move forward on solar, wind, geothermal,and other alternative sources.”
REALITY: PALIN CUT FUNDING FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY
2007: Palin Vetoed $20 Million Toward A Fire Island Wind Farm Project.“[Sen. Hollis] French and [Anchorage Mayor Mark] Begich both lamentedthe [Palin] veto of $20 million toward a Fire Island wind farm projectand connecting transmission lines. That money was part of RailbeltEnergy Fund cash that Palin said she doesn’t want to spend until astudy on energy needs is finished.” [Anchorage Daily News (Alaska),7/30/07]
2008: Palin Cut $20 Million For Chugach Electric Association WindFarm. As part of a large package of budget cuts, in June 2007, Gov.Sarah Palin, R-AK, cut $20 million in funding for a Chugach ElectricAssociation wind farm. The funding was expected to come from a fundcalled the Railbelt Energy Fund. Palin said she cut the $20 millionbecause she wanted more information before dipping into the RailbeltEnergy Fund. [Anchorage Daily News, 6/30/08]

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

On the first point, stretching what?
On the second, I wasn’t aware you could be indicted for atheism. Guess I shouldn’t be surprised, the way things are going. Shouldn’t matter, though — I’m not going to criticize your beliefs, be they mainstream or Rev Wright. I personally think religion’s nuts, but that doesn’t mean I rail against religious people.
But I do find the constant focus on Rev Wright over the top. It’s a style of preaching, big whoop. I once went to a Catholic mass where the priest went off on a rant I certainly didn’t agree with — am I now responsible for what he said?
I don’t like religion in politics. Full stop.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

Debra
after all is said and done… Obama is just a puppet of Pelosi/reid who want control of everything…we are willing to cross party lines to make sure things do get done in this country… the obamabots can whine no more!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 3:59 am 3:59 am

Grace
you are just wrong… case in point Obamas mother who has been deified also but was an atheist and didnt have much hope thats what the relentless hope thign isd… nothing more its self agrandizement of Obama… this country was founded on religious principles therefore it is not your debate!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 4:02 am 4:02 am

Political animal fact checks Palin
(Political Animal) Factchecking Palin
I thought Palin’s speech was quite good: well-written, well delivered. And, as I said earlier, I think she’s a genuinely engaging person, and comes across very well. There were just a couple of problems. One, which I have seen people notice, but which I suspect won’t be a big deal for a lot of voters, is that it had very little substance. The other, which the commenters I saw on TV for some reason neglected to mention, was that she told a lot of lies. A few that stood out for me, or that I spotted in my quick run-through of some blogs:
Palin: “To the families of special-needs children all across this country, I have a message: For years, you sought to make America a more welcoming place for your sons and daughters. I pledge to you that if we are elected, you will have a friend and advocate in the White House.”
Sarah Palin might have changed her mind on this one recently. However, a comment here notes that Palin actually slashed funding for schools for special needs kids by 62%. Budgets: FY 2007 (pre-Palin), 2008, 2009 (all pdfs).

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am

Pro-choice and pro-life are outdated. One of the reasons I’m for Obama is that he’s pro-prevention.
There is no good reason that we don’t have more reliable, available forms of contraception. And this is an area where I believe religious interference has had a huge and lasting effect. As long as religion’s used as a tool to force abstinence-only programs and keep funding away from contraception, it’s a menace.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am

Grace it’s fine you went to a church with a Pastor who went on a rant….but you DID NOT HAVE A MENTOR/UNCLE RELATIONSHIP FOR 20 YEARS WITH THE GUY….SEE THE DIFFERENCE?

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Daisy,
Those snips are from the Obama campaign rebuttal. I have now switched to media fact checking
I want these right wingers to know that their VP’s lies are being thoroughly exposed.
You never walk alone.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Grace you touched on the only thing I agree with Obama on…pro prevention. I am a pro choice Independent, but have no prob with pulling the lever for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Debra | September 4, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Molre political Animal
Palin: “But listening to him speak, it’s easy to forget that this is a man who has authored two memoirs but not a single major law or reform – not even in the state senate.”
Ha, ha, ha. I gave a rundown of Obama’s accomplishments in the Senate here. They include the Lugar-Obama bill on nonproliferation, and an ethics reform package that the Washington Post called “the strongest ethics legislation to emerge from Congress yet.” Ruth Marcus summarizes his record on reform:
“He helped pass a far-reaching ethics and campaign finance bill in the Illinois state Senate and made the issue a priority on arriving in Washington. Much to the displeasure of his colleagues, Obama promoted an outside commission to handle Senate ethics complaints. He co-authored the lobbying reform bill awaiting President Bush’s signature and pushed — again to the dismay of some colleagues — to include a provision requiring lawmakers to report the names of their lobbyist-bundlers. He has co-sponsored bills to overhaul the presidential public financing system and public financing of Senate campaigns.”

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

Oh, whatever, staniam. This country was founded on FREEDOM of religion, not on religious principles. Many of the founding fathers were agnostic, and most of them wrote strongly against religion mixing with politics.
You are free to practice whatever you practice, and I am free to not. Unfortunately for you, I am also an American, and thus just as able to discuss the state of the nation and general politics as you are. I’m sure you’ll be horrified to learn that my vote counts exactly as much as yours does.
Did you know that Palin believes that the Founding Fathers put “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance? Founding Fathers, 1776. Pledge, late 1800s. “Under God”, mid-1950s. Just saying, there’s been a lot of retroactive religioning of the poor Founding Fathers, who were more philosophical than zealous.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

Her speech was combative. She sounds as if she is talking about an enemy and not a Political Opponent.
She actually sounds like someone that would be vindictive. Her speech makes it easy for me to connect to Troopergate.
In my opinion, I don’t only think she is a bad pick, I also think that, with her combative approach to things, she would end up being at daggers drawn with Senator Mccain in the next four years if they win the election.
Internal squabbles between the President and his Vice-President will definetely grind the affairs of states to a halt..
The Speech was written by President George Bush’s former Speech writer (that gives me the creeps) and she was only asked to deliver the Speech, which I will say, she did well.
Anybody learned in Public Speaking would have done the same.
My disappointment is that in all the time taken to deliver the Speech, there were no mention of isuues of how, the ticket would take America from the pariah President Bush’s has made it to eldorado.
The nucleus the Speech was an attack on Personality. That is not a way to run a respectable campaign.
Lindsay Lohan would have delivered it better. It was pure acting. It is crass despiration to hound on the emotions of an average American.

Posted by: owen jacob | September 4, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am

Debra, I don’t agree 100% with all my friends. I have one friend whose views on the sanctity of Israel would absolutely kill me if I ran for office. Should I shun him? It’s just a point of view, after all.
Good to hear we’re on the same side regarding prevention — more the merrier on that one, I think. All I can think of when I see McCain is that New Republic article about his behaviour towards pro-choicers. Shudder. And then I think of the Supremes…
Anyhow, different (and sometimes wildly different) viewpoints are useful. Oprah went to Trinity, for heaven’s sake — so do a ton of people on Chicago’s South Side. Yes, the preacher uses invective. I can see why that causes friction between the “love your country no matter what” sector and the “challenging your country only makes it stronger” sector. I belong in the second category — recent display of patriotism have been far too close to jingoism to me.
Be proud of your country when it deserves it. I think America’s done a lot of things in the recent past that we need to atone for. The majority of the US continues to be kickass, but I refuse to ignore the bad spots and only sing about the good.

Posted by: Grace | September 4, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am

Sarah Palin was so mean and snotty tonight.

Posted by: gina | September 4, 2008, 4:33 am 4:33 am

Best line on the web tonight – paraphrased some writer at one of the major publications: The joke was on the people who had been laughing at Palin until tonight.

Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 4, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

Owen Jacob: “She actually sounds like someone that would be vindictive. Her speech makes it easy for me to connect to Troopergate.”
Exactly my thoughts. I too could fully understand the stories that were coming out of Alaska who demands absolute loyalty or else you’re out-a-here. This is not a woman who is willing to find a middleground, is willing to compromise, or is willing to listen to alternatives. It’s her way or the highway. In that regard, she fits right in with the Bushies.
McCain wanted to present himself as ‘bipartisan’ who is willing to reach across the aisle and work with both parties. With this pick, he has blown that message out of the water.
America doesn’t want more partisanship and lies and cheating; it want’s the government to finally get things done and solve the problems we’re facing.
With Sarah Palin, he has sent the exact opposite message to the American voters. McCain has given the American voters raw meat.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am

When comparing the legislative records of McCain and Obama in the Senate, we should actually use McCain’s first 4 years in the Senate.
McCain in his first term in the Senate was already embroiled in the Keating Scandal
Obama in his first term has actually cosponsored some highly important legislation. To wit:
-) The 2007 Ethics Reform Law, described as the “Most Sweeping Since Watergate”.
-) He was original cosponsor of a bill to create a “Google-like” database of information on federal spending.
-) Obama sponsored an amendment to require lobbyists to disclose the candidates, leadership PACs, or political parties for whom they collect or arrange contributions, and the aggregate amount of the contributions collected or arranged.
And this is just the legislation on Ethics and Transparancy. McCain says he wants ‘change’ Washington, but that’s just words. Obama has actually taken steps to change it.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 4:57 am 4:57 am

It was a great speech and it will only get better when she starts getting interviewed. The media will be blown away by the actual answers she gives.
This is unlike Obama, who says it’s above his pay grade to determine when life begins. Above his pay grade, as potentially the highest office of the land? Above his pay grade on the issue he said he would sign when in office, the Freedom of Choice act?
America has to vote for McCain-Palin. Both have actually fought Washington. Both will bring change.

Posted by: John | September 4, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am

“Female Clinton Supporters In Focus Groups See Talent, Mudslinging In Palin’s Speech”
These women were less impressed overall than for instance Debra and Samantha on this board (who were going to vote McCain anyway, no matter what)

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

John “Both have actually fought Washington.”
Oh? When?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am

Without community organizers, we would have no:
Civil rights movement
Gay Rights Movement
Anti-War Movement
Feminist Movement
How dare you mock the works of Susan B Anthony, Martin Luther King, Mother Teresa, Ghandi…
What about the murders of Community organizers James Chaney, a 21-year-old black man from Meridian, Mississippi; Andrew Goodman, a 20-year-old white Jewish anthropology student from New York; and Michael Schwerner, a 24-year-old white Jewish CORE organizer and former social worker also from New York, symbolized the risks of participating in the Civil Rights Movement in the South during what became known as “Freedom Summer”, dedicated to voter registration.
They are all Community Organizers. What, are they not rich enough to be important? Do their works on making this world better not count?
You have attacked the heartbeat of America. So many community organizers wake up everyday to reach out in communities across the world to make a difference in the lives of others.
And on national TV, the works of Obama as a community organizer, helping people, uplifting people during a time of loss in their lives, is ridiculed.
You mock America’s servants, you mock America.

Posted by: A Community Servant Serves the People | September 4, 2008, 5:30 am 5:30 am

The speech was well written, her delivery on reading it was labored. She could read the word ok but failed to properly deliver the speech as the writers ment it to be, failing to put proper emphasis on special parts of that speech. Obama on the other hand who writes all his own speeches doesn’t have that problem as he knows exactly what he wrote and where he wants to emphasize things in his speeches.

Posted by: Gomer Pyle USMC | September 4, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am

Gomer
he writes his own speeches because he is too self satisfied to trust anyone else and if he does write his own speeches why does he have a staff of 2000? Obama is history… you will wait for a trully democratic administration starting after 2012 we will do it and you will accept it!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am

Sarah is weak. Unable to write her own speech and use her own thoughts, she allowed herself to be used as a puppet to poke fun at community service.
As far as whining goes, tell that to Sarah who is whining that the media is unfair.

Posted by: A Community Servant Serves the People | September 4, 2008, 5:38 am 5:38 am

I feel Palin mocked me, my family and neighbors. I live in the elitist suburbs that she mocks. I did community volunteer work for indigent cancer patients. I have only one child. My teen daughter goes to private school and plays classical piano. She is not dating right now, because she wants to finish college before thinking about marriage. I am a stay at home mom, studying for my Graduate Records Exam in English/Literature so that I can become a reading specialist to help disadvantaged students.

Posted by: Bowman | September 4, 2008, 6:10 am 6:10 am

subsistantpotfarmer
if you think that Obama being elected will make your lifestyle more acceptable youre wrong… Obama will not be elected and when Mcain/Palin is we will go after special interests on both sides too time for you to atone!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

Bowman
thats all well and good but Private school and piano lessons is what can get Obama in trouble… Michelle once whined to an Ohio crowd that she had to pay $2000 for piano lessons… I bet that went over well! You cannot escape the elitist label…Obama will not make all your dreams come true… he brainwashed you!

Posted by: staniam | September 4, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am

Obama who?

Posted by: Gwyen | September 4, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Woman
PTA
Union husband
Hockey Mom
Spec Needs child
Mother of Iraq soldier
Smart!
That’s a lot of absolute moral authority

Posted by: drjohn | September 4, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

“Unable to write her own speech and use her own thoughts, she allowed herself to be used as a puppet to poke fun at community service.”
Obama didn’t write his speech either. He clearly is a puppet.
Obama spent all of three monthes as a community organizer and he failed.

Posted by: drjohn | September 4, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

“Sarah Palin Slashed Special Needs Education by 62% as Governor.
That’s a lie.
The budget for spec needs went from $1 million to $3.9 million under Palin.
Prove otherwise.

Posted by: drjohn | September 4, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Governor Palin is a force in new politics. Speaking beyond the podium into America’s households, she demonstrated that you can speak truth to power and not get smacked down for it. She showed the other 48 states (the governor of Hawaii rocked as well) that you don’t have to go along to get elected. You can stand with and on your principles. We used to elect people to GOVERN us not to share all of or views and mores. I would rather be governed by this woman whose other beliefs don’t always match mine than by the new regressives on the left.
You go, Sarah. I am putting a McCain/Palin yard sign in front of my house and pulling for you and John in November.

Posted by: beebop | September 4, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am

William,
“Great speech but we still have to wait and see how she does in the debate.”
I’m sure she’ll lie during the debates, too, plus throw in a few doggish jabs. Seems that’s all it takes for the republicans to get happy and excited.
Obama 08
Obama 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | September 4, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Sarah Palin’s politics could not be farther from mine. But as I was watching last night I texted one of my daughters, away in college (and also not a McCain fan). Told her Sarah was giving a great speech and was full of sass. I’m glad she did well just to shut the overbearing, overzealous critics up for a little bit.

Posted by: beth | September 4, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Did you hear Vice President (nominee) Palin’s speech? She knocked it out of the park and off the planet! When I say “it” I mean The Democratic Party’s chances for election. Then she used the decapitated corps as a punching bag and danced around it for the rest of her speech. This speech was a multiple warhead nuke that, didn’t just blow the opposition away, it ignited political drive in sectors of America the Democratic Party belittles with statements like “I’ll be with you in a minute Sweetie” Uhm I mean Senator Clinton. In addition to the average, unemployed, Midwestern, gun toting, religious bigot’s, this speech spoke directly to workers, farmers and business owners as one entity. The Democratic Party has yet to figure out how to not pander to workers and farmers while quietly taking money from business owners through donations and taxes. There is one thing I hope this speech does not do. I hope this speech does not persuade Hammas, Fidel Castro, and other enemies of America to stop endorsing the Democratic candidate.

Posted by: Tom | September 4, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

I am reading the comments about attack dog and such and I am wondering did anyone watch the Democratic convention? Did they not attack McCain at every turn?

Posted by: Maria | September 4, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Palin’s speech had several empty promises- “The War is Almost Over” – do you recall the “Mission Accomplished” banner?
“We will lower your taxes”- and continue to mount debt on your children-$3.5 trillion over the last 8 years alone.
“We will provide health care for all” – by maintaining the same inefficient system we have and taxing employers.
Good one-liners though – hat off to the speechwriter.

Posted by: Larry | September 4, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

While she is a good speaker, it was obvious the speach wasn’t written for her but for Romeny and then tweeked. She did a good job on tghe parts about herself but spent most the time trashing Obama
STUPID STUPID STUPID, the center needed to know about her and she didn’t do that.
She was sarcastic and TRASHED community organizing
There are thousands out there that help our our communities and Palin TRASHED them
I am sick of the negative, devisive politics and I guess Palin is a Bushie, so she will not get my vote, she is clearly just 4 more years of Rove/Bush politics
McCain/Palin = POLITICS FIRST, COUNTRY LAST

Posted by: Palin was sarcastic | September 4, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Sarah palin is phony and scripted, now it’s time to face the people & interviews.
a loving introduction to her family. WHY DID SHE OMIT BECOMING A GRANDMOTHER?
so she can read scripted attacks,what is she going to do for me?

Posted by: so | September 4, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

A quick word on the diversity of the GOP convention
Only 36 of the 2,380 delegates seated on the convention floor are black, the lowest number since the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies began tracking diversity at political conventions 40 years ago.
hattip wapo

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

SHE WORE AN ALASKA FIRST PIN. WHATS WRONG WITH THE AMERICAN FLAG PIN?
all attack and not an ounce of humility or connection to middle America

Posted by: watching | September 4, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

More on GOP diversity
According to a CBS-New York Times poll released Sunday, 5 percent of delegates are Hispanic, the lowest percentage at a Republican convention since 1996.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 4, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

drjohn:
“That’s a lie.
The budget for spec needs went from $1 million to $3.9 million under Palin.
Prove otherwise.”
====
Budget for Spec. Needs Education in 2007 (=pre Palin): $ 8,265.300
Budget for Spec. Needs Education in 2009 (third Palin-budget): $ 3,156.000
That’s slashing with 62%
Ouch.
Got more?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Sarah Palin is not qualified to be president. First, she does not have enough education, just a mere bachelors degree in journalism, won’t cut it. When did we start electing presidents who are so ill educated? I doubt if she has intelligence to read and understand complex domestic and foreign policy documents. Second, she is being used by the McCain campaign to fool the conservative base. Can Governor Palin deal with complex foreign affairs issues facing this country? Sarah Palin has only traveled outside the shores of the United States once, I mean once in her entire life. This is so bizarre that she is even on this ticket. Third, she talks about a dangerous world, is she experienced enough to deal with these complex issues. She has to answer tough questions. She has to tell us what she thinks about Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, Sudan, China, India and the world at large. If we elect this ticket, it will again showcase to the world that we are an ignorant nation that elects ill prepared and ill educated people to govern over us. It puts the whole idea of democracy into question. No doubt she is a good mom and a woman but again with her little foreign policy experience which is very evident in her foreign trips, is she qualified to be commander in chief?

Posted by: Albert | September 4, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Palin gives a nice speech…hmmm, isn’t that what Obama has been criticized for? It is no surprise that Republicans are thrilled with her. She is attractive but sorely lacks experience and carries no weight. Her political positions and lack of experience cry out for media probing. She has yet to face the national media and answer any tough questions. Of course, Republicans will reply that answering tough questions becomes media bias. When will she face the media? When will she answer questions about her background and political positions. Republicans want to handle her image. They should not be allowed to get away with it. This woman seems like a nice woman but utterly unprepared for the job of president. I don’t even know if she is prepared to govern Alaska since she has been in office only 2 years. So what if she has 80% approval. So, did Bush after two years. America has two months to learn about this women and you get bet Republicans will want to manage what the media reports over those two months…

Posted by: indy_voter | September 4, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

GOVERNOR Sarah Palin has energized the base of the Republican Party. And if anyone thinks that the Republican Party is not fully behind the McCain-Palin ticket, then you are in for a huge surprise. This is going to be a real dogfight. And it is the Republican Party who has the pitbull–with lipstick! I am really looking forward to the Biden “mauling” coming in St. Louis on October 8th.

Posted by: James Danley | September 4, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Wow! What a speech. Can you say Margaret Thatcher? She was outstanding. The dems are running scared. All of the sudden the comments are starting to look like DNC quick response points rather than opinions.

Posted by: Walsh | September 4, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

I have heard so me lines here about her being a good mom and wife and potential grandmother. Yes she is all of that. But the big question is this: does she have what it takes to spare this country’s foreign policy initiative? You cannot elect a total neophyte to deal with complex issues facing this nation in these dangerous times. I repeat her selection is meant to energize the base, but again, she is ill equipped and ill prepared to be president.

Posted by: Albert | September 4, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Maria: “Did they not attack McCain at every turn?”
Hardly. They attacked Republican policies and especially the Bush-policies McCain wants to continue; but nobody attacked for instance McCain’s service in the military or his character or his years as a Senator.
On the contrary. There were many many many praises for McCain’s service and person.
Rudy and Sarah clearly mocked Obama’s community service, his service in the State and in the US Senate, and his character.
And what’s even worse: they lied about Obama and his policies. That’s the most disrepectful thing you can do: how would you react when I started telling lies about you to everybody who was willing to listen?
You don’t have to agree with your opponent positions, but at least have the decency to present them correctly and THEN explain why you think they would be wrong for the country.
But it seems lying about your opponent’s positions has become standard procedure for Republicans.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

beebop, commonsense,beth, Tom,
You know, I empathize with your feeling of exasperation. It appears you have not borthered to check major blogs see how well Gov. Palin’s speech was received.
I have a newflash for you. It has been rated as hateful, vengeful, lacking in substance and full of vituperations on Opponents than addressing issues that affect an average American home.
To me, she sounded awfully spiteful and vindictive.
She criticized Washington that has been held by the jugular by same forces that are backing her Candidacy. The same Washington that was mismanaged by George Bush, a GOP himself.
Is it not tantamount to throwing stones in a glass house?
She was not the best pick. She was picked to assuage the feelings of the Social Conservatives and Evangelicals, who were hitherto not supporting Mccain.
Mccain the not consider the future of the Country in picking this Woman.
She is Governor of a State of less than 700,000 and the demand of office prevented her from noticing while her daughter strayed to the extent of getting Pregnant.
Have you pondered to ask yourself when she started having sex. Can you see the hypocricy of a Governor, who was against the teaching of Sex Education in School while her Daughter was eating the forbidden fruit?
Listen to her Speech with unalloyed objectivity and not from a parochial and jaundiced position and see whether you will still feel that the Speech was great.

Posted by: owen jacob | September 4, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Correction, the Biden “mauling” will be on October 2nd.

Posted by: James Danley | September 4, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Ryan -
Thanks for trying to put some facts on the table but as Rick Davis, McCain’s campaign manager, said the other day, “this election is not about issues.” If your candidate had voted with Bush 90% of the time, you’d probably have the same hope.
Facts don’t matter…they just confuse folks. You’re therefore better off sticking to slime, half truths and innuendo. And by all means keep your posts short. The lunatic fringe has a short attention span and prefers to communicate in bumper sticker slogans.
All good wishes.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 4, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

James Danley: “And it is the Republican Party who has the pitbull–with lipstick!”
And how is that going to change Washington? How is that going to fix the many problems the US faces? Do you really think send out a pitbull with lipstick will solve it?
It seems you’re more interested in retaining power than in solving problems.
We’ve already endured 8 years of pitbulls, with or without lipstick (Cheney, Rove, Bush, Addington, Rumsfeld, Bolton, DeLay, the entire neocon cabal). And it is these pitbulls that have us brought us this mess.
The entire rostrum of speakers tonight have issued only *ONE* policy proposal. ONE: Drill, Baby, Drill.
Morons.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Sarah is a compelling figure just as Obama is. But there’s a big difference between the two, which won’t be lost on Middle America. Sarah talks to us – Obama talks down to us.

Posted by: marylou | September 4, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Obama gives inspirational and rallying speeches. That’s why he has legion of followers. Sarah Palin’s speech is divisive. There was nothing unifying in that speech last night, it was jab after jab on Obama and the democrats. It makes the trooper gate allegations seem so true. Governor Palin gave a speech last night. She has to back it up with series of engagements pointing out what she will bring as an independent thinker to a McCain’s administration. She is a down to earth rural American mom, she is someone the average mom can identify with, but is she ready to lead the free world? For the fact that someone is a down to earth middle American mom, is not a qualification to deal with complex economic and foreign affairs issues.

Posted by: Albert | September 4, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

Walsh: “Can you say Margaret Thatcher?”
It was more like Tonya Harding.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

The Democratic ticket is in deep trouble this morning. As the media snakes slither out from their rocks and renew their attacks on Palin, as Biden haw haws his way through an attempt to appear a gentleman, the kind that brings the drink and pats a woman on the head, as Donna Brazille gets a bit grayer and a lot more angry, as the frustrated red faced commenters here try to replay Get Hillary The Sequel, as they all squeal like stuck pigs…
America has a new hero: Sarah Palin, lipstick, heels, big glasses and all the smarts it takes to lead a country out of the dark days of a Democratic economy, through the haunted forests of Hollywood induced paranoias, and into the clarity that we are a good nation, a powerful nation and a nation of ideas, of people that can and will take back their right to win in the face of the smugness that is the left’s will to fail.
Well Dems, this was the election you could not lose, but today, you are so screwed.

Posted by: len | September 4, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I thought Palin’s speech was far more engaging and effective than Biden’s convention speech for sure, and in its own way better than either Clinton speech or even Obama’s address. There is a directness, freshness and energy there. Palin has a natural gift for communication.
Hint to Harry Reid: Calling the speech “shrill” reveals you to be a thin skinned sexist ass.
Hint to Team Obama: Calling the speech “snide” instead of simply praising the newcomer for a job well done shows how worried you really are. And with good reason. This fresh newcomer just blew a 5′X6′ hole in the hull of the SS Obama.

Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 4, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Marylou,
Sarah’s talking to you won’t bring America out of the ditch w’ere in with the mortgage crisis,inflation and overall quality of life.Perhaps you’ve inherited a heirloom thats why you don’t feel the pain of the angry guy on the streets,even in small town America.It just won’t cut it.Not now.Not tomorrow.Not even a mere wish.

Posted by: ObaMan | September 4, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

“Sarah’s talking to you won’t bring America out of the ditch w’ere in with the mortgage crisis,inflation and overall quality of life”
Sarah sent $1200 to the citizens of Alaska. Obama just keeps asking us to send him more money. He won’t even let us have tax relief for gas prices calling it all “gimmicks”, but it’s not a gimmick if we send it to him.
It’s pretty clear who the Candy Man is in this race.

Posted by: len | September 4, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

ObMan:
Her speech was indeed shrill, too harsh and very divisive for a newcomer to the political scene. She brands her self a bulldog. We need more of unifiers than bulldogs in Washington. The necons did a lot of bull dogging, where did that land us? McCain won’t win with her on his ticket. She sounds very vindictive. That’s not good

Posted by: Albert | September 4, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I agree with Palin on some issues (smaller government, lower taxes, energy policy) and disagree with her on others (social issues), but last night I liked her. She’s feisty and real. This Clinton supporter has a lot to think about…

Posted by: Nancy | September 4, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Owen jacob, you wrote: “Can you see the hypocricy of a Governor, who was against the teaching of Sex Education…” Actually GOVERNOR Palin said that she was against “explicit” sex education and the distribution of contraceptives in schools.
Now then you say that GOVERNOR Palin was not the best pick for Sen. McCain’s running mate. Was Sen. Biden the best pick to be Sen. Obama’s running mate???
Finally, you say that Sen. McCain did not consider the future of the country in selecting GOVERNOR Palin. Actually he DID. Sen. McCain strongly believes that he is the right person to be president the next four years. You can agree or disagree with that, but that IS what he believes. And in order to become president, he must win the general election. Sen. McCain selected GOVERNOR Palin because she will energize the Republican Party which increases the odds that he can win the election. Clearly he was right on the first part. Yhe Republican Party is, indeed, energized. We will have to wait until November to see if an energized Republican Party is up to the task of turning out the vote.

Posted by: James Danley | September 4, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

To Brooklyn Democrat:
Thanks for the reminder. Immediately after the Palin speech Obama’s camp released a statement about McCain voting with Bush 90% of the time, blah, blah, blah. It’s the exact same line they’ve been spouting and repeated here for about a week. That tells me they were certainly caught off guard by tone and content of the speech and couldn’t muster a substantive retort on the spot. They couldn’t turn the words of an unqualified hockey mom and mayor of Podunk, Alaska against herself. Doesn’t that concern you?

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

I think she’s great. As far as i’m concerned, anything or anybody who can keep Oblahblah out of the White House is great.

Posted by: clarabow | September 4, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Marylou:
Sarah talks to you by talking down on Obama and deeming the role of community organizers everywhere. She is not ready for the white house, period. She is too naive for the job, having only travelled overseas once in her life. That won’t cut it.

Posted by: Albert | September 4, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Obaman writes:
“Sarah’s talking to you won’t bring America out of the ditch w’ere in with the mortgage crisis,inflation and overall quality of life.Perhaps you’ve inherited a heirloom thats why you don’t feel the pain of the angry guy on the streets,even in small town America.It just won’t cut it.Not now.Not tomorrow.Not even a mere wish.”
Why so angry, Obaman (or should I say Olberman)? When I graduated high school I had $100, a deceased mother, an out-of-state father and an acceptance letter to the state university. I also had a plan to get that college degree even if it meant working three jobs while doing so, which I did. You need to ask yourself what you can do to improve your own situation. I’m not saying it’s easy. Sometimes you have to work really, really hard for something if you believe it’s worth it.

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Willem van Oranje, if you really want change in Washington D. C., then push for term limits. As long as we have senators and representatives who remain in office 20-49+ years, you will never really have change. These “old dogs” are set in their ways.

Posted by: James Danley | September 4, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

“The whole world is in love with the Palin family. God bless America!”
Hahaha.
It’s pretty clear that you have no idea how our allies in Europe think of fundamentalist christian right-wing family as the Palins…
What me struck, as an American who spent 9 months of his life fighting a senseless war in Iraq, is that NO ONE at the Republican mentioned talked about our war in Afghanistan, or even mentioned it…
Republicans, shame on you!
Your leaders are cynical, populist, hollow puppets of Big Corporate Interests and REALLY nothing else.
In the meantime friends of mine are fighting the Taliban and Al Quaida in Afghanistan, risking their very own lives for the security of the US and the rest of the world.
And Palin, Giuliani, Romney?
THEY DO NOT CARE ONE BIT!
The only good thing about it: the millions of Americans that are the movement that brought Obama to where he is today, are FURIOUS after this horrifying GOP convention and more than ever FIRED UP AND READY TO GO!

Posted by: hank | September 4, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

To Albert:
Let’s see … shrill, harsh and divisive. Reminds me of similar criticism for a different female politician we’ve heard in the past. And heaven forbid anyone criticizes Barack Present Obama (I know we can’t use his middle name so I’m using something “neutral”). Seems like when a woman is critical she’s shrill and divisive, when a man does it he’s tough and resolved. Same old cliches.
And she’s unqualified to be VP because she’s only travelled overseas once in her lifetime? How often did Bill Clinton travel overseas before he was president, not counting the time he didn’t inhale at Oxford? What about Obama? I know he was recently shamed into going to Iraq on his way to his European campaign, and I know he went to Africa in 2006 but apparently could not find his long lost brother. What other stamps are on his passport and what’s the significance? What’s the point?

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Hazel Johnson is the community activist who got the asbestos removed in Chicago. Obama just took the credit for her work. Obama is an empty suit AND a liar.
Vote Sarahcuda and McMaverick for REAL Change!

Posted by: marylou | September 4, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

To Willem van Oranje :
The Special School spending was in no way cut 62% from 2007 to 2007. The line item for the AK Challenge Youth Academy line item was simply moved from the Special Schools sub-group to its own line item under K-12 Support. The money is still being spent on the same programs, it’s just in a different area on the spreadsheet. But hey, don’t let facts and sloppy research get in the way of your idealogy.

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

concerned in OH,
You are not making much sense.
What Upper-cut?
I urge you to continue to live a world of deception. Check all blogsites in America and around the World and see the fool your party has made of itself by giving such an hateful and gutter speech.
My heart actually went out for all those People in that hall cheering while such Speech was being read from the Telepromter.
It makes me remember battles between Rappers. I had to pinch myself to realsie that it was actually a political Speech I was listening to.
It is so pathetic that with her degree in Journalism, she allowed President Bush’s Script writer to write such a dumb speech for her at this time when Americans are hurting from the maladmnistration of G.W Bush and Cheney.

Posted by: owen jacob | September 4, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

All the talk on the morning shows is how Palin SUCCESSFULLY hit Obama where he set himself up to be toppled. Obama is the JOKE OF THE DAY!

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

To owen jacob:
Check all the blog sites in America and the world? Can you please be a little more specific? Which blog sites, please? I’m anxious to see what the world thinks.
Thanks in advance!

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

For those that don’t get it, this is not about being a female Candidate. It is about leading the greatest and most powerful Country in the free world. A Country with tons of Enemies that are waiting for the appropriate time to strike.
A country with declining economic fortune, a Country with Mortgage crisis, a Country that is unprecedentedly more vulnerable than ever.
There is no sexism in this, it is only commonsense.
I could remember that the same Gov. Palin said of HRC during the Dems Primaries that HRC’S whinning about sexism disgusts her.
Now the table has turned and she is shamelessly complaining of the same thing she accused HRC of doing.

Posted by: owen jacob | September 4, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Woody: “The line item for the AK Challenge Youth Academy line item was simply moved”
I stand corrected. That appears to be the case. I’d like to know why it was moved.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Woody, read the post on this Political Punch-blog “Michigan Independents Cold to Alaska Governor”.
Two posts down the line

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 4, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

I know, I am not the only one getting tired of being PREACHED to from all the Obama supporters. We KNOW the issues. But you yourselves, when attacking Hillary claimed we vote for the PERSON. Well, I CAN’T STAND BO! “Huh? Issues? Uh huh yeah, yeah wait! Palin’s talking, tell me later.”

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

I have a question for people who are voting outside their party?
What now makes you change…do your values not matter to you in this election?

Posted by: QuestionTime | September 4, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

OK, I googled as requested and I see a fairly mixed bag of results, about a 50/50 split of pros and cons. And nothing too unusual, I might add. The lefty sites are slamming her (theguardian, huffingandpuffingtonpost, etc.) and the righty sites are thrilled (rightpundits, foxnews, americanmissive, etc.) I fail to see “all the blogs in America and the World” spouting off about how foolish the Republican party is.

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Willem,
I checked out that thread. OK, some “independents” from Michigan, where Obama currently leads by as much as 8 points depending on the polling organization, took issue with Palin’s speech. I live in a state where registered independents outnumber registered dems and reps, yet the state legislature is 75% Democratic and we haven’t elected a Republican president since ’84. I always take the word “independent” with a large grain of salt.
Ooh, I see one of the “independents” is a Cindy Sheehan supporter. Yeah, OK.

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

To QUESTIONTIME: I value MY FEELINGS, I can’t stand Obama.

Posted by: irma | September 4, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Woody,
Have you taken a look at Ticker on CNN? The comments will make for interesting reading.

Posted by: owen jacob | September 4, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I voted for Hillary. Now I’ll vote for McCain/Palin

Posted by: Katie Walker | September 4, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Oh my,
More of the same old lies. She has the greatest number of earmarks and claims to be a reformer. She was for The Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it.
Good-Bye McBush/Pain

Posted by: Ohenry | September 4, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

To Irma:
I understand a lot people, Republicans and Democrats are both crossing party lines! I’m just curious if that makes sense??
You say you voted for Hilary, she believes in Pro-choice and McCain and Palin essentially want to take that right away from women. (For example)
I mean there are several issues they differ on…or is the person who is running that affects your decision, not necessarily what they believe in and what they plan to do for our country??

Posted by: QuestionTime | September 4, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Willem:
Once again, consider the source. A single blog on a left-leaning news site is hardly indicative of “America and World”. That’s my point.

Posted by: Woody | September 4, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

PJ:
“I will do everything in my power to ensure that my children do not grow up in Sarah Palin’s world.”
What is wrong with Sarah Palin’s world?
You either have no children or they are babies. We can only teach them, but as much as we would like to control them it is impossible. Wake up and “smell the coffee”. Better her world than the other one.

Posted by: MEW | September 4, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

James Danley,
McCain said that the number one quality for a vice president is the ability to take over should something happen to the president. If that is supposedly quality (which I agree) then the choice of Palin seems odd. It appears to me McCain would rather win an election than put the country on safe ground should he not serve out his term. So much for country first!

Posted by: indy_voter | September 4, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

Grace,
Well said…As for Bristol’s “decision” to have the baby I would bet that there was no decision to be made. I believe at 17 in Alaska she would have had to ask her mother’s permission. And I bet her mother would have said no and not even considered alternatives such as abortion. So, there is no decision by Bristol. The decision was made by Sarah Palin I am sure.

Posted by: indy_voter | September 4, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

indy_voter, GOVERNOR Palin has almost 8 years of executive experience. That happens to be “almost 8 years” more than Sen. Obama who has NO executive experience. As governor she has an annual budget of $10 Billion. If it came down between GOVERNOR Palin and Sen. Obama taking over on January 20, 2009, I would go with experience–GOVERNOR Palin. So I am not the least bit worried about whether something, God forbid, would happen to Sen. McCain.

Posted by: James Danley | September 4, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Why are we just now hearing about “Executive Experience” …like its something just now being discussed to make us think that Palin is ready to be VP??
And why do you keep comparing her to Obama…I thought she supposed to be compared to Biden?

Posted by: Sara | September 4, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Willem van Oranje, you wrote: “When comparing the legislative records of McCain and Obama in the Senate, we should actually use McCain’s first 4 years in the Senate.”
In his first 4 years, Sen. McCain served 4 years. In Sen. Obama’s almost 4 years, it has been reported that he has served only 143 days. Good comparison! By the way, Sen. McCain was cleared of all charges in the Keating Five scandal.
In his first 4 years in the Senate–actually in his entire 25 years of being in Congress–Sen. McCain claims to have requested NO earmarks. In Sen. Obama’s 143 days he has requested 217 earmarks totalling over $500 million (per Sen. Obama’s own report). Ouch! That is more than $3.5 million per day served.
Now then you mention the bills that Sen. Obama co-sponsored. All it takes is to sign your name on a piece of paper to co-sponsor a bill. He didn’t write the bills. I have yet to see any evidence that he twisted a single arm to get any of the bills passed.
So 143 days of service; signing one’s name on a few bills; casting a few votes; and spending $500 million of the taxpayers’ money…yep that sounds like a really great resume to be president. NOT! Actually I wouldn’t even vote for Sen. Obama to be dog catcher! Especially knowing that he will never catch the pitbull with the lipstick!

Posted by: James Danley | September 4, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Sara, indy_voter referred to Sen. McCain’s statement that the number one quality for a vice president is the ability to take over should something happen to the president. Once the Republican Party officially adjorns the convention in a few hours, should anything happen (God forbid) to Sen. McCain, GOVERNOR Palin would become the Party’s nominee for the general election. THAT is why I am comparing GOVERNOR Palin to Sen. Obama.

Posted by: James Danley | September 4, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

James Danley
Is there a REASON why you capitalize Governor…you’re putting emphasis on a position she’s held for 20 months…it takes people longer to get an Associate’s Degree!

Posted by: Sara | September 5, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Sara, actually yes! The Obama campaign has on several occasions totally ignored her experiences as governor–even if only 20 months of experience (which is more than Sen. Obama’s 143 days of service in the U. S. Senate).
Sen. Obama’s own words: “Well, you know, my understanding is that, uh, Governor Palin’s town of Wasilly [sic] has, uh, 50 employees, uh, uh, we’ve got 2500, uh, in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. Uh, uh, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month. Uh, so I think that, uh, our ability to manage large systems, uh, and to, uh, execute, uh, I think has been made clear over the last couple of years.”
Why would he call her Governor Palin, and then reference ONLY her experience as a mayor for his comparison. As governor of Alaska, Governor Palin has 25,000 employees and an annual budget of $10 Billion.

Posted by: James Danley | September 6, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

CORRECTION, the source I had for Sen. Obama’s earmarks, while claiming it was ALL of his earmarks was actually only his earmarks for 2006-2007. It did not include his 2008 earmarks. The updated total for for Sen. Obama’s earmarks is 330 projects totalling $931.3 million. That equates to slightly over $6.5 million per day served in the Senate (143 days).

Posted by: James Danley | September 6, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Since my latest trips to the doctor I have been a lot more concerned about my health.

Posted by: Gricelda Keledjian | October 20, 2011, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.