Obama Challenges McCain’s New Definition of the ‘Fundamentals’ That Are Strong
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., when describing the fundamentals of the economy — which he maintains are strong — has, in the past, described those fundamentals as the U.S. being "the greatest exporter, the greatest importer, the greatest innovator, the greatest producer, still the greatest economic engine in the world. And, by the way, exports and free trade are a key element in economic recovery."
Taking heat today for asserting this morning in Jacksonville, Fla., that the fundamentals of the economy are strong — when headlines from Florida to Alaska wail about Wall Street failures — McCain offered later in the day a new definition: "The American worker and their innovation, their entrepreneurship, the small business, those are the fundamentals of America, and I think they’re strong," McCain said in Orlando.
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has been hitting McCain hard on the comments for months, never including McCain’s many caveats and statements of understanding that people are hurting.
Tonight in Pueblo, Colo., Obama not only repeated McCain’s assertion about the strong fundamentals — "of all days!" Obama said, "He said (it) just this morning" — he also mocked McCain’s new definition.
"A few hours later, after he said this, this morning he said this, ‘The fundamentals of the economy are strong,’ John McCain’s campaign sent him back out to clean up his remarks," Obama said to the crowd at the Colorado State Fair Grounds grandstand. "And he explained that what he really meant, what he really meant to say was that American workers are strong."
The crowd of an estimated 13,500 did not seem to believe the new explanation.
"Now, come on, Sen. McCain!" Obama said. We know you meant what you said the first time because you’ve said it before. You said it just a few weeks ago. And your chief economic advisor — the man who wrote your economic plan — said that we’re in a ‘mental recession;’ that this is all in our heads; that we’re a nation of whiners. That’s what he called you, a nation of whiners!…
"Now, don’t get me wrong, don’t get me wrong," Obama said, "when Sen. McCain says that American workers are the backbone of our economy, and that they aren’t getting a fair shake from Washington, he’ll get no argument from me. My argument is, it’s about time that he figured that out. Because I’ve been making that case for nineteen months.
"So, I congratulate Sen. McCain for saying something nice about American workers, I think it’s good that Sen. McCain is celebrating the American worker today. But it would have been nice if some time over the last 26 years he stood up for them once in a while!"
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Again: Obama, we know you think McCain doesn’t know jack, okay?
What will you do, specifically, to stabilize the economy, besides raise taxes on the wealthy and implement new spending programs? (and no, giving $1000+ out and magically creating “green” jobs does not count)
Posted by: Wade | September 15, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“So, I congratulate Sen. McCain for saying something nice about American workers, I think it’s good that Sen. McCain is celebrating the American worker today. But it would have been nice if some time over the last 26 years he stood up for them once in a while”
Excellent line!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 15, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Again: McCain, we know you think Obama doesn’t know jack, okay?
What will you do, specifically, to stabilize the economy, besides cut taxes on the wealthy and drill for oil? (and no, giving $1000s to the upper 2% and magically creating Walmart jobs does not count)
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 15, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
I’m not concerned about wealthy investors who think stocks should always go up? Obama and McCain were in the same dysfunctional senate and share in the blame for the economy. I’m going to vote for the candidate I like best. I usually vote Democrat but the party has lost it’s way. I’m going to vote for McCain this year. He served in uniform during the war and that means something.
Posted by: independent | September 15, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
“Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., has been hitting McCain hard on the comments for months, never including McCain’s many caveats and statements of understanding that people are hurting.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 15, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
How can McCain mind the store when he has very little idea how it runs?
How can Palin mind the store when she didn’t even do anything about the fact that rape victims in Wasilla had to pay for their own forensic tests?
A pair of dunces.
Posted by: Danny | September 15, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Did I forget to mention that John McCain was a POW and the qualifies him to clean up the Republican messes? OOPS, he is a Republican–did I mention he was a POW?
BTW: did you know that Alaska is near Russia and that means “horseshoe foreign policy experience”?
Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 15, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Right on Barack.
Expose Palin/McCain as the bridge to nowhere.
Posted by: doug | September 15, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
No matter what Obama says, his formula for fixing the economy is to raise tax on business. Period.
While companies are struggling, his solution is to burden them with additional taxes in order to hand out entitlements, (like giving tax refunds to those who don’t pay taxes, one of his more brilliant schemes)
If 38% of americans don’t pay taxes AT ALL, why is it fair to those of us that have built businesses, and sacrificed, and taken risk, to bear this additional load?
While those that have never taken risk, or sacrificed time away from their families can spend it?
If the government can come into my pocket to the tune of 60%, the new upper tax rate under Obama, how is that in any way equitable?
Posted by: hippie_chucker | September 15, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
What is this “Mr Do Nothing”? In his legislative career, Obama has authored JUST AS MANY pieces of legislation as McCain has in less than half as many years. Many of them had bipartisan support.
And how does calling Obama a “freak” speak to the issues, except YOUR own issues??
Posted by: mila | September 15, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
The tide is turning and the Obama camp is getting back on track. Palin had her week or two to bathe in glory.
I like the new and improve Obama camp. They recieved the memo. Fight back.
So far so good.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 15, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Obama is soooooooooooooo soooooooooooo desperate. He now thinks Karl Rove is on his side. Can you say coocoo!
Posted by: OhBarry | September 15, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
The fundamentals of this economy are strong. The fundamentals are free market, competition i.e capitalism. If Obama thinks that capitalism is broken would he like to fix the economy by replacing it with different fundamentals. The only others I think of are socialism and communism. Obama needs to tell the American people which fundamentals of this economy he would like to change. I think we deserve an answer.
Posted by: coolrepublica | September 15, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Jesus why would obama want to delay the troops coming home?
Posted by: stephen | September 15, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Obama has made ending the war in Iraq a hallmark of his campaign. Is he more concerned about bringing the troops home sooner than later or does he really want the troops to remain in Iraq just long enough so he can take credit for fulfilling a campaign promise? The idea that a presidential candidate would try to keep the troops in harm’s way any longer than he believes necessary is truly disturbing.
Regardless of my political differences with Sen. Barack Obama, I sincerely hope this turns out to be untrue. Perhaps those in the MSM can get over their “tingly feelings” for a moment and actually do their jobs and follow up to find out if this is true.
Posted by: angie | September 15, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Blogs are going crazy over the story that Obama has tried the delay of the troop withdrawl!!!
Posted by: Vanessa | September 15, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Why is Obama now bashing American workers? Is he trying to bring the economy down even more? After I heard that behind the scenes he was trying to delay bringing home the troops I really don’t trust him.
Posted by: GregFL | September 15, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
I don’t care how dirty he plays even if he goes to the mud… as long as it’s Obama/Biden 08.
As long as he’s hittinh McCain on the substance or McCain’s false ads.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 15, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
McCain/Palin have had about as good a 2 weeks any Presidential campaign has ever had, but Obama is really starting to pound McCain on the economy and has turned things around over the past 4 days. As long as people are not distracted with pigs, smears, and fake controversies, Obama will be fine.
Posted by: Mike | September 15, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
McCain just doesn`t get.
Posted by: Krista | September 15, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
McCain thinks the economy is fundamentally sound because it is for him and his rich friends! This man is so out of touch it is ridiculous and Palin is even worse. Lest we forget, McCain is a republican–that’s the party that has RUINED this country for the past 7-1/2 years!! Throw the bums out and start over with a veto proof majority of democrats for the house and senate and a democratic president and then things will get done. The republicans have had their chance and they have DESTROYED America; if McCain wins the election, God help us all because I don’t know how American can survive 4 more years of republican abuse!
Posted by: realitycheck | September 15, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Hippie Chucker writes, “If 38% of americans don’t pay taxes AT ALL, why is it fair to those of us that have built businesses, and sacrificed, and taken risk, to bear this additional load?”
============================
Individuals like yourself seem to fixed on “What Ifs” versus reality. Obama won’t raise taxes. That’s just a scare tactic used by the Republicans to get the less informed on board. As far as your statement above? Over the past eight years overall productivity has increased while compensation for said work has decreased. Simply put, Americans are working longer/harder and the affluent/corps are reaping the rewards. Maybe you should be asking WHY they shouldn’t pay more?
Posted by: Dems | September 15, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Biggest Liar Ever!
Guess who? John McLiar
Posted by: Lie_Detector | September 15, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
I’m very glad to know the economy is fundamentally strong.
I was beginning to wonder…
Posted by: tca | September 15, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
isnt that against the logan act?
Posted by: angie | September 15, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
You Repubs have to wait till 2012 to bring a better candidate who can stand Obama in getting the job done. I dont see that in McCain.
Obama 08
Posted by: keith | September 15, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Why did Obama try and delay bringing the troops home? Why Barry why?
Posted by: NoBarry | September 15, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
McCain = DISHONORABLE.
Posted by: Howard Gallas | September 15, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Ryan C:
Okay, he’s got some plans about helping individual mortgage buyers against future fraud crisis. First, that does not necessarily address the overall stability of the economy now. Second, so does McCain. See his website, too…
Posted by: Wade | September 15, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
John McCain would fit in nicely at the Ministry of Truth. 2 + 2 = 5 because that what satisfies the party.
Posted by: Rick | September 15, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
The right wing has to push their lies.
Isn’t it pathetic how everyone of them is demanding that MSM cover their bs story?
This is like the thrown away flags, Obama not visiting the troops in Germany etc.
They’re all right wing lies told because the right wing is afraid Obama and the change he will bring.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 15, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
The fundamentals of capitalism are strong in the US. Greedy banks are paying the price for their greed and taking advantage of less ignorant of the nation.
Obama speaks as if the US is about to have a coupe by our military. The coupe we don’t need is Obama and his give me, give me lots of freebies followers.
Posted by: Mrs.Phoenix | September 15, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Obama is a fool for criticizing McCain on saying the economy is fundamentally strong.
Obama would rather create a PANIC just to win the election.
FOOLS – you are messing with a run on the banks and a total collapse of the economy stirring up panic. STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama’s campaign is all about fear, not hope. He trys to stir up fear over Roe vs Wade. He stirred up fear on Iraq, and now he comes out and stirs up fear on the economy at a very fragile moment.
I don’t want a President who speaks to the nation in a time of crisis and says we are weak doomed and failing. Sorry, I personally don’t think that is what we need right now.
OMG – I can’t imagine him as President stirring up constant fear and panic.
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | September 15, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Wade,
They actually share a few plans for the economy at least in terms of focus of what needs to be done.
They just disagree about how to do it.
Always a pleasure Wade but I’m off to watch football.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 15, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Look at all the GOP bloggers trying to divert attention from the gaffe their candidate made. Truth is the Iraqi gov`t has endorsed Obama`s 2010 withdrawal plan.
Bottomline is McCain is out of touch. Get over it.
Posted by: Krista | September 15, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Where is Michelle Obama?
Posted by: Samantha | September 15, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
What is Obama going to offer? At least Mc Cain is making gaffes.
Obama will not tell you as Mc Cain is going to hit him more harder.
Posted by: Tim | September 15, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Ryan C:
All good, enjoy the game…I think everyone is stumped how we get out of it, myself included…
We got there by everyone, greedy mortgage planners, regulators, and consumers, etc., being irresponsible. I remember thinking a few years back, when I heard on the radio…$800 mortgage on $300K? Why am I not living in a palace? Then I remembered! TANSTAAFL…
There Ain’t No Such Thing as a Free Lunch. Wish bankers and gov’t types would remember that…and that does included the Bush admin and the R and D congresses…hopefully either candidate will propose solutions that are more responsible.
Posted by: Wade | September 15, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
According to First Read, McCain has said that “the fundamentals of the economy” are stong 16 times since Jan 1st to June 5th and he repeated on August 20th during the Laura Ingram show.
McCain you have been caught red handed!!!
Posted by: Samantha | September 15, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
the mortgage issue started with the deregulation and the bush push for $0 down and 100% financing. That opened the floodgates. People who would have not otherwise allowed into a lenders office were getting notes written.
Posted by: Jason | September 15, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
Anyone care to put in print how Obama’s district in Chicago is doing? If he can’t manage his own house…
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 15, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
This is all gotcha politics.
Michel Bloomberg–who was on Obama’s VP list for his economic credentials–agreed with McCain today that the fundamentals of the economy are strong.
The state of the Dow today cannot be attributed to the economy as a whole, but instead to the failure of one of America’s largest investment banks that got burned through its investment in subprime mortgage funds.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 15, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Who is Sarah Palin again? Sarah who?
Posted by: euro.guy | September 15, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
I would like a McCain supporter..an everyday person like me to articulate McCain’s economic policy. If it is so great, I’m sure you can summarize it..so go ahead, I’d love to read it…because Senator McCain sure hasn’t told us anything other than “it’s the opposite of Senator Obama”…I’m waiting….
Posted by: Maryann | September 15, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Reality has crashed into Mr. McCain and now he is off rails. Boo hoo for him. He is toast.
Posted by: euro.guy | September 15, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
Oh yeah-for anyone who thinks Obama isn’t going to raise taxes, please check out Cook County and his ENTIRE home state. Those close to the borders fill up in neighboring states to escape the tax on gas.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | September 15, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
By John McCain’s new definition, the fundamentals of the economy in the US have always been strong including during the Great Depression.
What’s next, is he going to define the fundamentals of the economy as the fact that we have warm bodies in the US?
Seriously, does anyone believe that the Republican party is the best choice to implement government regulation – the very antithesis of their platform?
Posted by: johnTX | September 15, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
28 years of Reagan’s “supply side”, “trickle down” economic theory has brought us to this state; massive debt, record budget deficits, huge trade imbalances, lost skilled jobs, unfunded social security and medicare/medicaid obligations, huge corporate failures, a massive transfer of wealth from the middle class to the top 1% of the US… the list goes on. The Republican party has been towing this line since 1980 and it has failed miserably. It’s time to throw them out once and for all. As for raising taxes, OF COURSE someone is going to raise taxes!!! How do you expect to eliminate a $417 BILLION budget deficit, with “spending cuts”? HAHAHAHAHAHA As for McCain/Palin CUTTING TAXES…. What a JOKE. The only budget items big enough to make a difference in the deficit are defense, social security, and medicare/medicaid. Yeah, let’s see McCain/Palin try to cut THOSE budgets.
What a crock.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Wow. Now we’re spreading ridiculous rumors?
Come on. Let’s think about this rationally. How would delaying withdraw of troops from Iraq help Obama?
First, the Iraq issue isn’t even on anyone’s top ten list anymore. No one has even talked about it in a month.
Second, having troops start to withdraw right now makes it a lot easier to attack John McCain for his opposition to withdrawing troops. After all, is he going to send them back? He’ll have to reverse his position about withdrawing troops and that flip-flop would be major for Obama.
So really, this rumor is just brain dead. Next people will start bringing up how 9/11 was manufactured by the Bush administration. Come on… this doesn’t even pass the sniff test.
Posted by: johnTX | September 15, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Are our memories really so short we can’t remember the Phil Gramm sponsored legislation of 1999 & 2000? His zealous effort to use a Republican majority to push through “deregulation” of the financial environment directly contributed to the current debacle! Meanwhile Gramm continues to often travel with the McCain camp, and provide economic and fiscal advice. Wow!
Posted by: Lars | September 15, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
Lars – not to mention Reagan’s deregulation of the Savings and Loan industry in the early ’80s… Anyone remember that one? Of course, John McCain remembers…. His good buddy John Keating went to prison for fraudulent activities enabled by this wonderful Republican idea.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Reagan’s “supply side”, “trickle down” economic theory….
is also known as “horse-and-sparrow economics – that is, if you feed the horse well, some will pass on through and be there on the ground for the sparrow.”
I suppose McCain/Palin could tweak it and call it the “moose and sparrow theory”. That would be the likely reform they would give us. Feed us more of the same crap.. but, give it another name.
Posted by: Jim | September 15, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Chris in TX,
That’s an interesting historical perspective you have there. The fact is Kennedy was also a supply sider (a rising tide lifts all boats). During the Reagan years his supply side policies brought in record tax revenue. Unfortunately the Democrat controlled Congress spent it faster than it came in. Every balance sheet has two sides to the ledger and Reagan did his part. Bush 41 tried to balance the books by raising taxes, failed miserably and lost his job.
Clinton worked extremely well with Gingrich and Lott. They all actually worked together to balance revenues and spending. Spending is the key. Graham-Rudman was effective while it lasted. Since then Congress has returned to its spending ways, both Democrats and Republicans. And of course the spending on the war has hurt a lot.
I’m oversimplifying quite a bit but you can’t possibly blame today’s financial crisis on supply side economics.
Posted by: Woody | September 15, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
His good buddy John Keating went to prison for fraudulent activities enabled by this wonderful Republican idea.
****
That is correct. Do you remember Mother Teresa and Keating?
I do not remember the Keating Five being brought up at the GOP convention. BTW, did you hear that McCain was a POW???
Posted by: Jim | September 15, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
McCain will pick up where Bush left off. You’ll get more Bush years if you vote for McCain. McCain thinks the same as GW Bush. Can it be any clearer? Just read his record. He agrees with Bush on everything. He even started fudging on torture a few months back. The old guy’ll do anything, say anything to be president, even bring in a far-right fundie Flat Earther, one of those Agents of Intolerance he used to ridicule not long ago, to be his VP. Amazing. Integrity can be a fleeting thing. The guy’s a mess, he’s desperate to be Pres, no matter what it takes. Boy, that sure instills confidence in his future leadership, doesn’t it? He agrees with Bush on THAT, too.
No more Bush years, please. Don’t use your vote to toss us back where we were. We’re all doing our best just to catch a normal breath after 8 years of the last guy. And the old guy thinks just like him. Please don’t do it to us again.
Posted by: dmw | September 15, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I can’t believe anything McCain says anymore. He’s lost all credibility.
Posted by: AkaDad | September 15, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
Woody,
I don’t blame supply side en toto. Many factors have been at work here eg. ill advised deregulation, self-serving politicians, etc. As you say, a balance sheet has two sides. However, I would assert that it is a major factor in our current dilemma.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
MidWestLady – the days where this country can produce leaders like Lincoln and FDR are long gone. The American dream has been inherited by “lesser men”. Politicians of both major parties put party first, American people second. Their only purpose is to attain and maintain power for its own sake. Every election cycle they pander to us because they need our votes. Once elected they go do whatever they want without regard for our needs. Personally, I fell for Bush’s “compassionate conservatism” line. Mea culpa. What separates the Bush administration from all administrations since Nixon is that Bush is completely honest about it. Anyone remember what Cheney said when told that the American people did not approve of the Iraq war? He looked right into the camera and said “so what”.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Samantha
The New York Post is owned by Rupert Murdoch, who happens to own Fox “News”.
The story is a lie.
Posted by: AkaDad | September 15, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
JOHN MCCAIN during the banking and housing crisis:
“The fundamentals of the economy are strong.”
HERBERT HOOVER during the Great Depression:
“The economy is fundamentally sound.”
McCain just doesn’t get it. Vote Obama.
Posted by: VoteObama | September 15, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
So “Samantha”. You’ve posted the same “story” a number of times here without identifying the source. Can you provide a link to this article?
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Actually it’s called being responsible. While portraying the economy as a disaster may have short-term gain for Senator Obama, it will not help the situation as the market is largely driven be the confidence of investors at any given time. Mr. McCain has acknowledged that our financial institutions need to have more regulation and that he knows that it is a difficult time for Americans. Trashing the economy is putting politics before responsible governing. GW Bush did the same thing prior to being elected which no doubt helped worsen, in the short run, the decline in the stock market that came in the wake of the dot-com bust. Obama, as usual, puts himself first.
Posted by: Barbara D | September 15, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
The facade of government authority is too weak at present for the ruling class to allow McCain to win. This is evidenced by his fellow Republicans beginning to throw him under the bus. The ruling class, it appears, has decided that McCain doesn’t have what it takes to keep the opposition loyal. I for one am glad that we are going to have a black president, and yet, in the end it hardly matters what race our overseer is – we’re still on a plantation after all.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 15, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
BarbaraD – I agree with you to a point. McCain now says that financial institutions need more regulation. He conveniently forgets that he and his party are responsible for the very deregulation that he now wants to reverse. Where was he during the S & L debacle? Answer – having dinner with John Keating. He can’t have it both ways. He can’t be the “maverick” outsider when he is the consummate insider.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Samantha – the “washington post” is a big entity. Please provide the link to the article so we can all read it.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
How about McCain just keep challenging the fraud to town halls? The tone of this campaign wouldn’t have to be this way IF OBAMA DIDN’T RUN SCARED. Hillary encountered this and when he wouldn’t meet her for debates, they took a more negative tone because Obamai wouldn’t MAN UP!
McCain needs to keep hammering this empty suit to MEET HIM FOR 10 TOWN HALLS! HE RUNS ON SCARED…BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!
McCain you keep challenging him on that or the ads are just going to keep going more negative!
Posted by: Debra | September 15, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Chris in Texas,….read the NY Post…google Obama to delay Iraq troop withdrawl.
Posted by: Debra | September 15, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Flash Overdrive – well said. Not that I’m cynical or anything…..
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
wade:…yes that does count
Palin said she would cooperate in troopergate and now refuses even after her husband has been subpoenaed.
If it were Barack & Michelle Obama in this mess what would the media and republicans be doing?
Posted by: watching | September 15, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
The king of voter fraud Obama and his asociation with ACORN….this election will be fixed and it’s going to make the Bush/Gore debacle look like a teaparty…..it’ll be a month before we know who won and Obama/Axlerod will be playing dirty Chicago politics again.
Posted by: Debra | September 15, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Samantha and Debra – thanks I found it. Although I’m wondering why this only appears on the NY Post and FOX News…. Still, something to think about.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
Debra – please accept my apology. You are obviously sincere in your beliefs. Sincerity is good for all of us.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
I always wondered exactly what McCain meant by ‘country first’. At first, I figured that it signalled a change in the standard Republican position of putting their party before their country, but now I’m not so sure. Does this mean that McCain doesn’t agree with the premise ‘one country under God?’ Thats been in the pledge of alliegance for about fifty years now, does he want to go back to the original?
Posted by: Mike | September 15, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Not so “Sam”. I live in Dallas county. At the 2006 mid-term election the voters threw out EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN who ran for office. EVERY ONE. From district attorney to dog catcher. McCain had not better take Texas for granted any more. Remember, Texas was Democratic LONG before it fell for the Repub nonsense. Take your tampon and smoke it you cretin.
Posted by: Chris in Texas | September 15, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
We are responsible, for whoever we choose as president. If we choose McCain, we should bear responsibility for that choice, if we choose Obama, we should bear responsibility for that choice. So for economy, America’s stand in the world, we would bear responsibilty for whoever we pick as president. If the country gets worse, the economy crashes and we lose our stand in the world as number one because of who we pick as president, its not the president’s fault but ours.
Posted by: Benjamin | September 15, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
“The state of the Dow today cannot be attributed to the economy as a whole, but instead to the failure of one of America’s largest investment banks that got burned through its investment in subprime mortgage funds. ”
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | Sep 15, 2008 8:25:10 PM——————————————-
You are as clueless as McCain. It wasn’t a failure of ONE investment bank. One is going bankrupt, another was luckily purchased before it had to go bankrupt, and AIG is having to borrow just to stay afloat.
Posted by: Dave | September 15, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
People don’t follow sound bites that the media provides, they are to get an audience. Check into the candidates their voting in the last few years, their policy for the future.
Obama’s tax plan will hurt all people it is sold as more money for the lower and middle class when they too will be paying a much larger portion of their taxes.
Check into things, Obama has no concept of the economy or money – Tony Rezko owns his home. And most things he says he follows McCain.
Change and more of the same, yes that’s what your offering Obama.
Please Americans look into these things with Snopes and your favorite news sources you will learn about the real candidates. Don’t just follow a party, don’t follow a sound bite.
Do what is best for you, your family, your job and your safety.
The economy for the last 4 years is more of a democrat issue than a republican one, since congress has been in democrat controll during that time. A president can only do so much with out level of checks and balances. Can’t point any one person or party, have to make choices overall that help everyone.
Posted by: Check into It | September 15, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
“Not so “Sam”. I live in Dallas county. At the 2006 mid-term election the voters threw out EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN who ran for office. EVERY ONE. From district attorney to dog catcher. McCain had not better take Texas for granted any more. Remember, Texas was Democratic LONG before it fell for the Repub nonsense. Take your tampon and smoke it you cretin.”
Posted by: Chris in Texas | Sep 15, 2008 9:59:47 PM
———————————-
Since 1968, Texas has only gone to the democrats in ’68 and ’76 – and it was very close both times.
With that said, it sure would be nice if the majority of Texans became more intelligent and didn’t fall for the republican lies and BS.
Obama/Biden ’08 ’12
Posted by: Dave | September 15, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
I’m tired of Barack whining about how terrible things “are” and how terrible things would be if McCain is elected.
He is a monster, set to slash and burn the likely next President, McCain, as he did to Hillary.
No matter what happens in this election, John McCain’s image will not be tarnished.
Obama’s will forever be in the gutter as a disgusting treason.
Posted by: John | September 15, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
“The economy for the last 4 years is more of a democrat issue than a republican one, since congress has been in democrat controll during that time. A president can only do so much with out level of checks and balances. Can’t point any one person or party, have to make choices overall that help everyone.”
Posted by: Check into It | Sep 15, 2008 10:34:47 PM
————————
All the more reason to vote democrat for every spot on the ballot, for every seat, whether it’s at federal, state. or city level!!!
If we take more republicans out of congress they can’t play their games and filibuster.
And besides, the country did better with a democrat in the white house even when congress was a republican majority.
Posted by: Dave | September 15, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Dave that would be a disaster, you would create a dictatorship in that method, you want to be a country like Russia?
Don’t be so silly and naive.
Posted by: What | September 15, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
No matter what happens in this election, John McCain’s image will not be tarnished.
Obama’s will forever be in the gutter as a disgusting treason.
Posted by: John | Sep 15, 2008 10:49:48 PM
———————————–
Sorry to break the news to you…. but McCain’s image is already tarnished.
Even Rove said McCain’s ads have gone too far!!!!! And you’ve got to be a real slime ball for Rove to say that about you.
Posted by: Navy Dad | September 15, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
ALASKA LOVES SARAH for the great work she has done reforming government to work for the citizens, and AMERICA IS FALLING IN LOVE WITH SARAH for her genuine sincerity, honesty and brilliant mind.
It is time to recognize that women can do a great job, many times better than men and Sarah Palin’s record shows she is exceptional.
The Obama campaign and the liberal media is in disarray, confused and foaming at the mouth after the Maverick, John McCain chose Sarah Palin, a woman reformer for VP. Their response has been a vicious attack on Sarah ranging from insults to smearing and the sexist tactics that brought Hillary’s campaign crashing down.
Obama fractured and divided the democratic party when he rejected the choice of 18 million democrats and instead of choosing Hillary for VP, he chose an old Washington politician Joe Biden, and by this grave mistake in choice, negated the flag of “change” Obama had been waiving and replaced it with the “more of the same” one.
On the other side, The Maverick stole the mantra of change from Barack when he selected a woman reformer for VP, who has gained the respect of the State she governs as well as of the nation governors.
The McCain/Palin ticket has also given hope to all the 18 million former Hillary supporters who now have a very compelling reason to vote for the republican ticket, as a way to put their country first by electing a president that has the qualifications, experience and love for our country and at the same time elect a woman to the White House as equal partners in governance and leadership of our country.
Country First!
DEMOCRATS FOR McCain/Palin!
Posted by: Manolete | September 15, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Dave that would be a disaster, you would create a dictatorship in that method, you want to be a country like Russia?
Don’t be so silly and naive.
Posted by: What | Sep 15, 2008 10:55:41 PM
————————-
Maybe you shouldn’t be so naive and look up dictatorship in the dictionary.
We the people still decide who gets elected. And the people still can remove anyone we so choose. And at this point in time, imho, we should remove all republicans. That will certainly get their attention, and maybe they will then take a long hard look at their failed policies.
Posted by: Dave | September 15, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Manolete,
Not all of Alaska loves sara palin.
Despite her favorite statement about the plane that she “put on ebay” it didn’t sell on ebay…. and she sold it at a $600,000 loss.
She tries to take credit for stopping the bridge to nowhere, but she only backed down after the bridge drew so much negative publicity and congress stopped it. Oh, and they kept the money for the bridge.
And the chef still cooks for the state…. just not for the governor.
That’s not what I would call a reformer!
Posted by: Navy Dad | September 15, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
The Republicans are the hugest complainers…what a bunch of little babies!
Posted by: stan | September 15, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
I do not think McCain is redefining his idea of economic fundamentals.
the greatest producer the greatest innovator = The American worker and their innovation
their entrepreneurship, the small business = still the greatest economic engine in the world
but I am an optimist, which is why i feel the Democrats will not win. They are tending to be dismal and dreary when it comes to the economy
Posted by: gmcc | September 16, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am
Imagine if it were Obama saying the fundamentals of our economy are strong on a day like this.
It would have ended his campaign.
Posted by: cincyr | September 16, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am
McCain is actually right on this one…..
If you and your wife own 9 homes and she’s worth 100 million, the fundamentals are always strong.
If your like G.W. Bush and your family has money and they’ve bought your way into everything, the fundamentals are always strong.
If your a CEO and your company has gone bankrupt, 100′s, maybe 1000′s unemployed,
lose your house, health plan, retirement funds,
but you still get your 50 million bonus, the fundamentals are always strong.
Posted by: Jazzman | September 16, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Obama would say or do anything to get elected. If elected, he would bring change all right … he would change everything that over 200 years of American history and tradition has achieved. He would have no allegiance to our country’s laws or customs. America would soon become a third world country with a totally weakened ability to defend itself. Since Obama talked his followers into believing and submitting to blind faith, instead of reason, Obama disciples are so emotionally invested in their messiah, that even if truth and facts are presented to them, they simply refuse to believe it. LIke lemmings, they would rather follow Obama off a cliff, than to accept the fact that he has been using them to achieve his personal ambitions. No Wright, no Farrakhan, no Pfleger, no Rezko, no Ayers, no mean Michelle, NOBAMA !!!
Posted by: Howard | September 16, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am
Howard
re: “he would change everything that over 200 years of American history and tradition has achieved.”
..in case you haven’t noticed, it only took Bush, Cheney et.al 8 years to bring America to edge of economic collapse. Hell, not even Bin Laden could do that.
re: “Obama talked his followers into believing and submitting to blind faith, ”
now, which Republican candidate for Pres. is it again that’s down on one knee kissing evangelical booty, and which V.P. candidate goes to one of them thar ‘blind faith’ ‘speaking in tongues’ fundamentalist churches in Alaska?
re: “that even if truth and facts are presented to them, they simply refuse to believe it.”
well, here you are correct in summarizing the McCain/Palin campaign attack ads and distorted campaign speeches.
…maybe it’s time to stop trying to recreate some version of a mythological American history and start living in the now, headed for a better future.
Posted by: Jazzman | September 16, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
All throughout 9/15/08′s media coverage of the Economic Crisis we are IN–not just the financial institutions crisis but our country’s crisis, there was speculation on how the candidates are going to handle the wall street problem, all pure speculation. How come no one is asking the current president, who is still in charge what he is going to do.
Bush is the one who should be hitting the stage handling this difficult time by addressing the American people.
We shouldn’t look past him towards the 2 candidates for answers.
This is a real crisis and we need real solutions NOW
Posted by: clarity | September 16, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am
Obama is trying to win on fear. He actually used the word “Depression” today when talking about the economy. Anyone who lived through the Depression knows that we’re nowhere near that today. But that aside…
What exactly has Obama done as a member of the U.S. Senate to avert the housing crisis that is pulling our economy down?
And how exactly does he intend to fix our economy without discouraging business growth and entrepreneurship by imposing higher taxes?
Posted by: marylou | September 16, 2008, 6:16 am 6:16 am
Yes, American workers are strong, despite the fact that McCain has regularly voted against minimum wage increases (19 times) and continually votes against unemployment insurance benefits.
With his “definition” of economic fundamentals McCain just continues to show his ignorance about economics.
Economic fundamentals are: unemployment numbers, numbers of new jobs created, inflation rates, the state of personal incomes, % of home ownership, # of new business starts, # of building/construction starts, etc.
Across the board, thanks to Bush’s mismanagement, the areas that should be up are down, the areas that should be down are up (inflation and unemployment particularly). And it’s funny how McCain lauds his economic advisors Phil Gramm (the mismanager in chief of financial regulation in the Congress) and Carly Fiorina (who ran HP into the ground). These two are complete incompetants.
In fact, Carly Fiorina is a great metaphor for McCain’s faulty ideas and the troubles with American businesses. She let HP’s stock lose more than half its value thanks to an incredibly stupid merger with Compaq. She oversaw HP as it had to cut tens of thousands of workers and declines in profitability and the bleeding from her mismanagement still continues as the company just announced another 20k in job cuts.
It is no wonder that McCain has no clue about anything with these people who have so little vision and business acumen setting his policies.
Posted by: Bud | September 16, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
old idiot said” …economy, economy fundamentals are strong”.
so , do not screw the nation, old Idiot. You said exactly what You meant – Yes, it is still strong for You, Alphonso, sitting on Cindy’s shoulders with dozen of homes.
Yes, it is strong for You.
Also strong for Pit Bull ,sitting on taxpayuers shoulders with her endless family .
get Out from our Horizon, deletants.
Posted by: linda,fl | September 16, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am
Clearly in a time when our economy depends so much on the confidence of investors, both domestic and foreign, and when there is a major financial crisis, it is imperative that an aspiring President of the US mock the suggestion that, despite the current crisis, our economy is fundamentally sound. It’s the job of any responsible head of state to stoke the flames of panic in the markets. Obama has shown that he can handle that job admirably.
Posted by: Judasmac | September 16, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
What sez:
(in regard to electing every seat at all levels of government to a Democrat)
Dave that would be a disaster, you would create a dictatorship in that method, you want to be a country like Russia?
Don’t be so silly and naive.
———————————–
What,
When GWB won the election and the Republicans controlled both houses of Congress, I had a good Republican friend who was extolling the virtues ‘efficient’ government was going to be.
during the coming administration.
I made the same argument that you just made.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 16, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am