By Stephen Splane

Sep 17, 2008 7:06am

Obama Does Hollywood

Many a film scene has been shot at the Greystone Mansion in Los Angeles, Calif., where a 55-room Tudor mansion tonight beckoned Hollywood glitterati to contribute $28,500 per person to the Democratic National Committee/Obama for America joint Victory Fund.

In "Indecent Proposal," the tycoon played by Robert Redford was seduced by the real estate agent played by Demi Moore as she showed him through the empty living room of the Greystone Mansion. He didn’t much care for the house, but her he liked.

Film buffs might also recognize the manse from "What Women Want," "The Witches of Eastwick," "The Big Lebowski," "Death Becomes Her," and "Batman & Robin," among others.

And it was here that Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Arrived shortly before 7 p.m. Pacific for a fundraising reception and dinner — salad with goat cheese, roasted potatoes, filet of beef and asparagus, apple crisp and chocolate lava cake.

Somewhere between 250 and 300 others signed up for the dinner, including Leonardo DiCaprio, Jamie Lee Curtis, Will Farrell — known for, among other characters, his devastating impersonation of President George W. Bush — as well as Jodie Foster, Toby McGuire, and Chris Rock.

Not to mention the man Sen. John McCain, D-Ariz., said was his favorite Hollywood "president," Dennis Haysbert, who played the assassinated President David Palmer on Fox’s "24."

At an outdoor courtyard within the Greystone compound, Obama told the gathered masses that his campaign offered a rather sobering look at the economic problems the nation now faces.

“It’s reminded people that this is not a game," Obama said. "This is not a reality show, no offense to any of you. This is not a sitcom.”

Many Democrats were apparently worried about the prospects of losing (again) in the fall.

“I know that a lot of you, just in conversations while we were in the photo lines, had all sorts of suggestions,” Obama said. “I know that won’t surprise you. And a lot of people have gotten nervous and concerned. Why is this as close as it is? And what’s going on? We always knew this was going to be hard, and this is a leap for the American people. And we’re running against somebody who has a formidable biography, a compelling biography. He’s a genuine American hero, somebody who served in uniform and suffered through some things that very few of us can imagine.

“And so he is a worthy opponent," Obama said. "And this should be hard, because what we’re asking of the American people is a fundamental shift away from an economic theory that has dominated over the last eight years, that says, ‘You give more to the most and hope that it trickles down for everybody else,’ an economic theory that basically says, ‘you’re on your own if you don’t have health care, you’re on your own if you don’t have a job; if you’re born into poverty, lift yourself up by your own bootstraps, you are on your own.’"

“If we can cut through the nonsense and the lipstick and the pigs and the silliness, then I’m absolutely convinced that we’re going to win,” Obama said to laughter and applause.

“We’ve still got enormous work to do because of the enormous resistance out there — resistance because people have been fed cynicism for a long time,” Obama continued. “When my opponent, and the operation that they’ve put together, starts feeding into that cynicism and starts feeding into that resentment, it’s not always clear which way things are going to tip.”

The senator said he was confident about winning because "I’ve looked at John McCain, I’ve looked at Sarah Palin, I’ve looked at their agenda, and they don’t have one.”

Ha ha ha ha, said the crowd.

"They don’t have answers to our economic problems," he said, “and they don’t have answers to our foreign policy problems." Obama asked the crowd to "keep steady" in the remaining 48 days until Election Day and to remember that his campaign "is about those who will never see the inside of a building like this and don’t resent the success that’s represented in this room, but just want the simple chance to be able to find a job that pays a living wage."

Obama then went to the ballroom at the Regent Beverly Wilshire.

Around 800 people — including Sarah Silverman, Ron Howard, Magic Johnson, and Pierce Brosnan — were there, eaching paying $2,500 to the Obama Victory Fund.

We are told, though the press was not permitted (inflicted?) with permission to hear her, that Barbra Streisand ran through little parts of songs, though not entire numbers.

Obama thanked everyone, then was serious.

“This should be a celebratory evening," he said. "We’ve got 48 days to go in a campaign, a campaign that started 19 months ago, at a time when a lot of folks thought we might not get here." But, he added, “I’m not in a celebratory mood.”

Obama listed the depressing headlines — Wall Street in crisis, hurricanes, the deadly train crash in nearby Los Angeles.

Obama offfered the Tinseltown big wigs his stump speech, and then told them not to worry about his calm demeanor.

“The reason I’m calm,” Obama said, “is I have confidence in the American people.”

Obama asked supporters “to keep on going out there, arguing and fighting” in the final 48 days.

- jpt

User Comments

How come no mention of Sarah Palin’s fundraisers with big CEOs and corporate donors?

Posted by: Marie L. | September 17, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

“We’ve still got enormous work to do because of the enormous resistance out there – resistance because people have been fed cynicism for a long time,” Mr. Obama said.
_________________________________
This only adds to reason for me not to support Obama. I always find this man to be very divisive. Say you are an independent like my husband who is leaning McCain. Language like the above is not going to make him vote for Obama because basically Obama just used words such as “resistance” and “fed cynacism”.
My family has genuine concerns about this man’s ability to lead our country. Words like this sound really “Stalin-ish” to me. Fall in line or you are resisting. What the heck is that?On the stump he just criticizes others and seems to just make up the policies and rules as he goes along.
I do see a very clear media bias towards him and now everyone is sniffing all ouve Palin’s family- yet where is Michelle Obama? She just disappeared.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Hmmm. No gun clinging religious zealots, were suddenly brave hard working Americans.

Posted by: david | September 17, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

It’s time for Obama to bring out his big weapon and give John McCain the bird. If that fails how about a really really big speech about nothing. Noboby, no nobody is going to rain on Michelle’s parade.

Posted by: Lisa | September 17, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

Where is she Lisa? Why doesn’t anybody find that strange?

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 7:32 am 7:32 am

Obama has class and intelligence. Im proud of him as an american. He is representative of the american dream. Long from now they will speak of these days as one of the most integral points of american history. Know people that YOU are experiencing true history. This is the time to stand up for the oppressed and make a stand against the tyranny.

Posted by: SemperFi | September 17, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

My family has genuine concerns about this man’s ability to lead our country
——————–
But we don’t worry that Ms “my national security credential is that I can see Russia from a remote island in Alaska”.
The “socialst” rhetoric about Democrats is always the same in every election.
Obama has a plan (versus just a bunch of right wing platutudes shoveled out from the GOP) that will benefit 85% of the nation. His policies will help the MIDDLE CLASS!
McCain’s “plan” to stay the course will continue to benefit ONLY the top 10% of the wealtiest Americans at the expense of the middle class.
OBAMA is representing the concept of what our nation was founded on – Gov’t by the people, FOR THE PEOPLE.
McCain suggests a continuation of governmrnt for the corporations.
However, the easily manipulated lemmings of this nation (the same folks that voted for Bush) may buy into all the psuedo-patriotic flag waving and misrepresented ideals spewed out by the Republican party.
“The fundimentals of our economy are strong”
John McSame – completely out of touch

Posted by: Truth Hurts the GOP | September 17, 2008, 7:38 am 7:38 am

We experience TRUE History every day.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Michelle is in VA today.
Economic Forum — closed to the public.

Posted by: susie | September 17, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

Truth Hurts
and that is exactly why there are voters out there called undecided. Using SNL skits as talking points are not going to keep me from voting for or against anyone. The point is Obama has done nothing to convince us that we should vote for him. We took a hard look at his record (or lack thereof) in Illinois. We were not impressed. We are not manipulated into anything. We see beyond these speeches. I actually knew what Mccain meant by fundamentals and I was not swayed by the Obama camp taking the sound bite and using it to their advantage. Nor was I swayed by the lipstick on a pig remark either. I give each candidate equal weight. I also look at character. For now Mccain is on top for us.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

And Michelle knows what the Bush Doctrine means.
____________________________________
I have never seen any proof of this. In fact one CNN newsman said that the so called doctrine is never referred to as such and even he admitted that he did not know what it was. Things like this don’t effect my voting for or against someone.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 7:47 am 7:47 am

I just watched McCain on GMA. It is amazing how he seems to have no understanding of complex issues. His answer for everything is “I won’t raise taxes” and “the fundamentals are the workers”. He clearly is only a puppet for the conservative right wingers that he’s now embracing. He scares me.

Posted by: Marika | September 17, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

Jake…where’s the story of McCain’s fundraiser for over $5 million the night before last with the rich folk at a posh Miami hotel or the Sarah Palin Ohio fundraiser with wealthy donors. And why don’t you talk about how the Republican party has twice as much money ($200 million) to spend on the election than the Dems.

Posted by: Mark | September 17, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Marika, Wait, I thought his answer to everything is “POW”.

Posted by: Bobba | September 17, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Hope he scraped the plates and sent some scraps to his brother.

Posted by: rktsci3127 | September 17, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

It is amazing how he (McCain)seems to have no understanding of complex issues.
_______________________________________
Again statement like this do not do anything for me.
I would be hard pressed to say that either of these men cannot understand complex issues. A acquaintance an Obama supporter gets very emotional around my family because she knows we may vote for McCain. She is actually quite frightening sends me emails that i don’t want and constantly is asking my daughter does she care about America. She tell my daughter that we are capitalist swine if we vote for McCain. McCain is brain dead and so and and my 19 year old daughter who was going to vote for Obama changed her mind after meeting some McCain canvassers and watching briefs of both candidates. i asked her what changed her mind and she said that Obama supporters were scary and that they never concede anything. They believe that this man has 100% of the right answers and she found that in her own words “lame”. When she told friends she was changing her mind she said she felt threatened because they kept calling her stupid and a wannabe rich person, a racist. I told her to never feel coerced into voting for ANYONE. That it is her decision to make all on her own.
We have never voted GOP before. We supported Clinton but this time I think we are going Mccain

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

Ah yes, movie “stars”, people who make a living pretending hangin’ with another person who has made a good living…pretending.

Posted by: rural americans | September 17, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

‘Emily Posted’: Actually, the Bush Doctrine is referred to as such and the term was used earlier this year. Gibson hosted the Republican and Democratic primary debates in New Hampshire back in January, and asked questions about the Bush Doctrine then. No-one had any problem answering.
I don’t think it’s a problem for the average man-in-the-street to not know what it is, but it does concern me if a potential VP doesn’t – it indicates they haven’t shown any interest in US foreign policy at all up to this point.

Posted by: Aengil | September 17, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Ok, listen up people. We have new rules here, and this is how its gonna go. Concerning the POTUS, anyone who has been a POW in the past, and is still living, please report your name to Washington and you will go on the POTUS list. You are owed a great deal by this country and we feel that since you were a POW you can be the President. You each will have a turn at the helm, and only after this process, can we then continue with general elections. Please everyone be patient!

Posted by: J. McCain | September 17, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Media is only hurting itself further by trying to put Big O in the whitehouse,,, Its so obvious that they create the news instead of report it,,,, Will any dem admit to this… The laptop is its biggest enemy not McCain

Posted by: jack | September 17, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Thank goodness Obama was in the senate to stop things with the economy. Obama is a lot of hot air!
Just like his Hollywood boozo’s. Most smart people realize the media in general are very much bias and left wingers. Stop your crying about everything!

Posted by: pamela | September 17, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Obama thinks he IS Hollywood. His ego will take anywhere there are cameras, money, and the spotlight.
This election is all about HIM as a black man wanting to make history. He could care less about struggling Americans, unless of course, they want to take his picture.

Posted by: Chipster | September 17, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

OBAMA/BIDEN 08 it’s said
please don’t vote for someone that already does not understand how bad our Economy is……….how will he/she fix it?

Posted by: gooessss | September 17, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

I think it’s interesting how the McCain supporters are so quick to criticize the Hollywood crowd. You might want to check how much money these people actually give to charity. They are some of the most generous people in the world, often giving money anonymously. With the amount of money they make they should all be Republicans because economically they would be better off voting with that party. Think about it.

Posted by: Mary | September 17, 2008, 8:11 am 8:11 am

Aengil, thanks but it still does not matter to me. I dont buy into a lot of it and Obama 57 states, president of Canada stuff either. Sarah Palin is not stupid and neither are ANY of the candidates. They all have different backgrounds and experience which I think is great. It is all good.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

You have issues with Obama, so dont vote for the guy. Not voting for him, isnt necessarily a vote for the Repub. There are others, or simply stay home. Continually posting negative posts about him, trying to convince others how to vote, isnt vetting, but says you are in the tank for Mcshame.

Posted by: J. McCain | September 17, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

I am confident about winning because, ‘I’ve looked at John McCain, I’ve looked at Sarah Palin, I’ve looked at their agenda, and they don’t have one.”

Posted by: Dufatanye Bertrand | September 17, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

I do not believe Barack Obama is only out for fame. He only attracts the cameras because he has a vision, and people are finally starting to wake up and view the facts. Everyone who stands up to make a change does naturally attract publicity. His ego is not involved here; he’s not calling on to me as very cocky. Sen. Obama is a very respectful, well-put-together man. Personally, John McCain is scared of the international publicity he has, because he is getting his words believed!

Posted by: K.Cook | September 17, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

I didn’t know that Cindy McCain was middle class…of course, you’re only rich if you make more than $5 million a year.

Posted by: Mark | September 17, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

‘I’ve looked at John McCain, I’ve looked at Sarah Palin, I’ve looked at their agenda, and they don’t have one.”
____________________________________
Again this is why Obama is not selling my family on his goods. Everyone has an agenda, everyone has a vision. Obama besides criticizing your opponents and flip flopping can you tell me excatly what your plan is? Can you tell me this without using the word Change as a mantra? Can you tell me what you will do rather than tell me what you think I need? Can you put more meat on the sandwich for me?

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

I will alsways vote and I am not staying home because I don’t like the DNC candidate. My daughter is not staying at home. I have not said anything in my posts to suggest that I telling anyone how to vote. My daughter and I disagreed for the longest until she saw that there was some blind allegiance thing going on for Obama with her circle of friends. I told her that it is good to question anything. This is her first chance to vote so she is not staying home.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

For all those would-be McCain supporters, look at the old guy’s record. Please. Yes he was a POW -should that go on his CV for President of the USA? Did you know he had the option to leave, as his Admiral Father came to visit him, lighting a cigarette? His choice of VP should say a heck of a lot about him: abuse of power is common place & out of touch is a reality. She can, however, see Russia from her house…

Posted by: Jackson Head | September 17, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

It’s so odd that someone running for President would go to LA to raise money. Do they even HAVE money in California? Also, John McCain would NEVER pander to the California rich – oh,wait, he did that last week. Get over yourselves people. Do you think either of them would go to a housing project and have a $1 all-you-can-eat buffet to raise money? They both do it, they have to. So McCain people, stop making a big deal of this. YOUR candidate doesn’t know how many homes he has, dresses his wife in six figure dresses and wears $400 loafers. HE’s the elitist!

Posted by: kcareymac | September 17, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

In Hollywood electing an inner city Marxist and product of Chicgo’s political machine — is the change we need! So what if those in the heartland don’t want their communities to look like the urban areas we’ve created. They are, after all, ignorant racists and religious fanatics. I heard Palin was actually praying for our troops and God’s guidance! Can you believe that! We need to stand up to those evil corporations and businesses that create jobs. Class warfare preached by Obama to Middle America might be our best hope.

Posted by: CannonRay | September 17, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

I saw McCain railing about the Repblicans in Washington yesterday. Does he not remember he IS a Republican (and works in Washington)?

Posted by: Sevres Blue | September 17, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Emily…apparently you have never listened to an Obama speech, gone to his website or read any of his books. If you had you would know exactly what he stands for. I’m an Independent, now an Obama supporter and I know his stand (in detail) about almost every issue. I also know John McCain’s stand on those same issues. I decided to educate myself before I made my decision about who to vote for. I would suggest you do the same before you throw out criticism.

Posted by: Marty | September 17, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

With Obama now doing mega donor and mega bundler financing in Beverly Hills I cannot believe that the MSM–including ABC News–is not calling Obama for backing out of his WRITTEN pledge to accept only the $85 million in public campaign finance money in the general election if McCain would so agree.
Not only did John McCain so agree, he has kept his pledge even though Obama gave McCain the perfect excuse to back out as well by breaking the pledge.
The definition of “honor” is what you do when it is no longer convenient. McCain passed this additional test, Obama did not.
Yet we have to suffer through Obama calling McCain a “dishonorable” liar.
If the News Media was fair and balanced and not in the Obama tank it would prominently cover this fundraising angle.

Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 17, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

CannonRay: you’d better stop lying about Obama’s “Marxism”, or people are going to start talking about McCain’s stupidity record, extramarital affairs, giving information to the enemy, and why he had to be airlifted out of the carrier that had the ”accident” to protect him from the wrath of the surviving crewmen.

Posted by: Sevres Blue | September 17, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Many people in Hollywood are far to the left of the average American. Hollywood support for Senator Obama will only reinforce Sean Hannity’s claim that Barack Obama is the most liberal member of the U.S. Senate. Those Americans who work hard for their paychecks and who “cling” to their religious beliefs won’t vote for Obama because someone like Sean Penn has written a fat check payable to Obama.

Posted by: Graniteman | September 17, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Graniteman..but it’s OK for the CEO of Walmart to write a check to John McCain, a company that treats it’s employees worse than they are treated in some third world countries?

Posted by: Marty | September 17, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Obama gets $9,000,000 in reparations from Hollywood. Now there is a story.
And the very night that the Fed took control of the largest insurance company in the world.
It is a reality show concocted in LA.

Posted by: Tony B | September 17, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Marty,
You miss my point. Barbara Streisand and Sean Penn are free to write checks if they like. So is the CEO of WalMart. My point is that the support of Hollywood ultraliberals won’t buy a lot of votes in Missouri, Ohio, New Hampshire, etc.

Posted by: Graniteman | September 17, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Emily…apparently you have never listened to an Obama speech, gone to his website or read any of his books. If you had you would know exactly what he stands for.
_____________________________________
I have heard more than a few Obama speeches. Gone and donated to the website but also donated to Clinton’s as well. I have read all of his books. I have Mccains books, Clinton’s book. And I am still not seeing what I need. It takes more than his speeches or words in print to get me to see that something that I need to see. And it is not just me. I hear others who say the same. You can’t put someone down everytime they say hey this guy is not connecting with me.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

A pop political celebrity among pop Hollywood celebrities.
How autographs did Obama sign?
How many rich, Hollywood celebrities said “Thank you, Obama, for wanting to raise my taxes and take 50% of my income?

Posted by: Zank | September 17, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

I wonder if any of those Hollywood big shots asked Obama why he tried to stall the withdrawal of troops from Irag until after the election?
Still waiting, MSM…… Day Three…..

Posted by: Lee | September 17, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Graniteman..it’s funny you should say that…I’m from NH. Just went to the Obama rally last Saturday. My entire family is voting Obama.

Posted by: Marty | September 17, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Jake, What was John McCain doing on Monday night? I understand he was holding his own fundraiser at a ‘swank’ hotel in Miami and he raised 5 million. Why not a story on that little event?

Posted by: TripleD | September 17, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Did you know he had the option to leave, as his Admiral Father came to visit him, lighting a cigarette?
_____________________________________
can you tell me more about this?

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am

Marty,
I’m from NH too. I’m a lifelong Democrat who has never vote Republican for president. I would have voted for Hillary but now I’m voting McCain/Palin. Prediction: They will carry NH in November.

Posted by: Graniteman | September 17, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

And Obama has the gall to say that McCain is out of touch? McCain is accused of not feeling America’s pain for accurately stating that we are in a very perilous time, the bottom has not fallen out. Inflation and unemployment is still on the (historically) low side and the GDP was 3% last quarter. Obama is the one taking the low road. Totally bad-mouthing the economy may have short-term political gain, but it also risks worsening the economy since confidence plays such a strong role in the stock market and consumer spending. The country is going through a spasm from the latest bubble bursting and there is unquestionably need for more re-regulation. Both candidates are for this. The challenge is to find the right balance of re-regulation to make the financial markets more stable without stifling growth. Neither candidate has fully addressed this question, but one thing can be said which is Obama is willing to risk to economy to win an election.

Posted by: Barbara D | September 17, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Sex Ed for Kindergarteners ‘Right Thing to Do,’ Says Obama
Email
Share
July 18, 2007 1:13 PM
ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Lindsey Ellerson Report: Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., told Planned Parenthood Tuesday that sex education for kindergarteners, as long as it is “age-appropriate,” is “the right thing to do.”
“I remember Alan Keyes . . . I remember him using this in his campaign against me,” Obama said in reference to the conservative firebrand who ran against him for the U.S. Senate in 2004. Sex education for kindergarteners had become an issue in his race against Keyes because of Obama’s work on the issue as chairman of the health committee in the Illinois state Senate.
“‘Barack Obama supports teaching sex education to kindergarteners,’” said Obama mimicking Keyes’ distinctive style of speech. “Which — I didn’t know what to tell him (laughter).”
“But it’s the right thing to do,” Obama continued,

Posted by: Tanya | September 17, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

“Tanya”
Now there is some real intelligence spoken by a liberal,
McCain/Palin all the way

Posted by: jeff | September 17, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

28,500 a ticket. Wow, we really are in a depression. That money could have made quite a few house payments.

Posted by: Maria | September 17, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

I don’t know if it’s just me but the timing and hype of this event just does not look good. I understand he has to raise money but a low key event would have been better and everyone knows Streisand doesn’t do low key.

Posted by: Ryan | September 17, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

How sweet. Maybe BIG NOSE Barb feels good about herself. I hope McCain/Palin shows them what they know about economics. I also hope they both focus on illegal’s in this country.

Posted by: Crimson Tide | September 17, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Graniteman who do you feel will carry NH? I used to live in Lebanon so I am just curious about what the Hillary supporters are doing there.
I am in Pennsylvania now.

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

Why is NO ONE discussing the report in the NY Post (Amir Taheri) that Obama tried to alter toop withdrawal timetables and other facets of the Iraq War? The silence from major news outlets is deafening, and I would think this would be considered a serious, serious issue. Come on, ABC! Do some digging.

Posted by: beth | September 17, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

And there are those who still believe Obama is not an elitist? He is entitled how? I am satisfied to be poor why? Give me a break! His words: “This campaign “is about those who will never see the inside of a building like this and don’t resent the success that’s represented in this room, but just want the simple chance to be able to find a job that pays a living wage.” This from the man who has never worked a real day in his life!

Posted by: kay | September 17, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

What’s McCain complaining about now? Didn’t he have a fund raiser with Pat Boone?

Posted by: fivepin | September 17, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Tanya: You have a problem with age-appropriate sex education?

Posted by: Aengil | September 17, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

The election looks close but if you breakdown the polls by race it’s amazing how far apart it really is. Currently, 55% of whites are voting for McCain and 38% for Obama, 4% of blacks are for McCain and 96% for Obama (per ABC poll). When you average it out the election is even. Does something seem out of whack to you?

Posted by: Greg | September 17, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

beth, there is a newsite out there that is reporting abc’s investigations of the candidates, apparently there are 24 for Sarah Palin, 2 for John McCain, 1 for Joe Biden, and 0 for Obama. Obama gets a free pass, always has, because there are all these threats out there if anyone looks into anything he has done, he will send his minions after you. They will call and email and threaten sponsors, and if that doesn’t work, he threats with law suits and the DOJ. I guess either reporters are afraid or they forgot the basics of journalism 101.

Posted by: samhiguchi | September 17, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Christine…what’s up with this “Republican heartlanders give their heart and pocket money to those in need”? Do Democrats in the heartland give nothing? Your words are one of the reasons why I’m not a Republican. Who are you to say that “Republicans in the Heartland” are more generous than Democrats? The Republicans say they’re the only ones who are patriotic, love America, put country first, etc. Well, America is not just the Republicans’ country. Stop the self-righteousness. Stop the divisiveness. The hypocrisy is unbelievable.

Posted by: Mary | September 17, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

BETH: Sorry I called you ‘Barb’ by accident. You just seemed so sharp!

Posted by: Sevres Blue | September 17, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Kay, Obama didn’t have a rich family and he worked for three years as a community organizer. How much do you think they get paid? Hint: it’s not a lot. It’s only relatively recently in his life that he could be considered wealthy.
I don’t think such attacks are appropriate on anyone, but they’re considerably less applicable to Obama than they are to McCain.

Posted by: Aengil | September 17, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

“McCain represents typical Washington – hey guys, let’s set up a commission to study why the economy is tanking! Dude, look at the deregulation and economic policies you and the Republicans have been pushing for years and you have your answer right there. ”
Dude (lol), look at the reforms the Bush administration have tried to implement since 2002, look at the quote from Barney Frank in 2002 saying that there’s nothing wrong with Fannie and Freddie, look at John McCain’s stand on the same matter in 2006, and look how the Dems ignored what everyone else seemed to know six years ago. The ‘it’s the Republicans’ line is getting a little old. There’s a paper trail showing who was concerned and who blew this off. Check it out…

Posted by: JJM | September 17, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Kay: go look up the word “elitist” in the dictionary. I believe John McCain’s name is listed there…. (or it should be). Just because someone is articulate and went to a good school doesn’t make them elitist. Not knowing how MANY homes you own does…

Posted by: Sevres Blue | September 17, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Top Recipients of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008 Name Office State Party Grand Total
Dodd, Christopher S CT D $165,400
Obama, Barack S IL D $126,349 ($6000 came from the PAC)
Kerry, John S MA D $111,000
Oh yeah, and who tabbed the former head of Fannie Mae to head up his Vice Presidential search team? OBAMA, that’s who. Back in May Barack turned to Jim Johnson, former CEO of Fannie Mae.
Johnson served as Fannie Mae CEO from 1991 to 1998 and has a long history in both Washington politics and business. He served on the boards of numerous companies, including The Goldman Sachs Group, KB Home, and Target Corporation, and has been Vice Chairman of Perseus LLC. He also was a corporate finance managing director for Lehman Brothers. He was an executive assistant for Vice President Walter Mondale (1977-1981) and a U.S. Senate staff member. Johnson also helped screen running mates for Democratic presidential nominees Walter Mondale in 1984 and John Kerry in 2004.

Posted by: Kirsten Powers | September 17, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Donna Brazile:
If Obama loses it isn’t because of him, it will be because the country wasn’t ready.
Joe Biden:
Electing Obama because he is black would be transformative.

Posted by: cindy in nc | September 17, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

“You give more to the most…” What a telling piece of verbal acrobatics. How about the truth – you allow the people who made the income to keep more of it. So, if Obama is elected we will usher in “trickle up” economics? What a joke.

Posted by: Twilson | September 17, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

When you think about it this fundraiser is actually kind of funny. A bunch of people who make a living reading scripts and making believe they’re other people, raising money for someone who carries a teleprompter where ever he goes.

Posted by: Maria | September 17, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

The Gibson Doctrine

Defining the Bush Doctrine: Not as Simple as it Sounds Gibson’s Face Reeked with Contempt: Dennis Prager on The Gibson Doctrine Bush Derangement DoctrineIt turns out, of course, that the Bush Doctrine question is a trick question. There is no

Posted by: Liberty Peak Lodge | September 17, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Obama tries to pretend he understands small town voters.
But he calls us bitter when around rich friends.
We can see what Hollywood and elites like Obama really think of us by their hateful treatment of Palin.
She is one of us.

Posted by: harry | September 17, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Donna Brazile:
If Obama loses it isn’t because of him, it will be because the country wasn’t ready.
_____________________________________
Yes, Donna we are all stupid and “resistant” to his message because we are spoon fed cynicism. Bleech!

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Making fun of obama for a 28,500 dollar a plate fundraise where they got a concert
while McCain charges 50,000 dollars a plate for…nothing.
kind of a metaphor for what their tax plan will eventually be…after you get done reading John Mccain’s lips.
lol

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 17, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

I was wondering the same thing, Beth, and have been for 3 days.
The big news is Palin’s tanning bed, not Obama’s treason……….

Posted by: Lee | September 17, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

If these hollywood people wouldn’t waste most of their money, maybe they could make a difference in this country, instead of wanting to be “liberal” with peoples hard earned money!!

Posted by: Fred | September 17, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Harry one candidate fought to protect you with regulation reform from those buig companies.
One candidate fought to give them no oversight…and hired the guy who got them that freedom to trash your economic safety… to write his economic platform
this is a joke
Mccain cares about the wealthy first.
Obama cares about the rest of America first.

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 17, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Mary says: “Who are you to say that “Republicans in the Heartland” are more generous than Democrats?”
I did not say that. I was simply pointing out the hypocrisy of the giving on the part of your two candidates who happen to be liberal democrats. They obviously believe that assisting those in need is the role of the government given their very poor history of giving, and you obviously have no defense regarding that issue. It’s no secret that Republicans support the ideology of people taking care of people with very little government involvement. I sincerely hope that democrats across this country are giving more than .1% of their income to support those in need…but they don’t have very good role models at the top of their ticket.

Posted by: Christine | September 17, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

On a day when problems on Wall Street dominate the headlines Mr. Hopenchange runs to Hollywood to hang out with his wealthy celebrity friends. The guy is a joke…he’s no more in touch with ordinary Americans than any of those actors he was rubbing elbows with.

Posted by: Chris | September 17, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

No time for middle class, middle American voters who “bitterly cling to God and guns.”

Posted by: carl | September 17, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Key Passages from today’s AP Story on McCain’s Two Faces:
“John McCain embraces and expels Washington like an accordion player belting out a song. Squeeze in and he touts his vast knowledge of the capital city. Draw out and he casts himself a reformer bent on changing its ways.”
“This time around, though, McCain is projecting a dual image: the outside insider. A 25-year veteran of the House and Senate, a white man like all the rest of the country’s presidents to date, McCain is trying to fend off a 44-year-old, first-term senator angling to become the first black to reach the Oval Office.”
“Squeeze in, and he’s the new capital tour guide for his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin. ‘I can’t wait to introduce her to Washington, D.C. I can’t wait,’ he said to cheers Monday in Jacksonville. Draw out, and he’s never set foot in the city himself. ‘The word’s going out, my friends: The old-boy network, the pork-barrelers, the earmarkers, my friends, the word is, ‘Change is coming,’ McCain said. ‘There’s two mavericks coming to Washington, and we’re going to shake it up.’”
“Squeeze in, and he’s got the Washington skill set needed to right the country’s Wall Street woes….Draw out, and he distances himself from the administration of the Republican president who has endorsed him.”
Finally, people start seeing McCain for what he is. The biggest flip-flopper in Washington politics, the greatest opportunist who has been running for President in decades.

Posted by: Puppet McCain | September 17, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

… so based on this little elite soiree, I guess Uhbama’s jabs at the “failing economy” have been rendered moot.

Posted by: BitterClinger | September 17, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

John McCain embraces and expels Washington like an accordion player belting out a song.
Squeeze in and he touts his vast knowledge of the capital city. Draw out and he casts himself a reformer bent on changing its ways.
It’s a remarkable dichotomy echoed throughout the Republican establishment, as a party that’s held the White House for the past eight years tries to retain its grip in what has shaped up as a change election.
None other than the current president’s brother has shown the GOP’s willingness to deny the past as it looks to the future.
“Reform becomes contagious,” former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said at a McCain town hall meeting this week in Orlando. “If you start to dream bigger dreams and you start challenging the basic assumptions, you can change how things work, and we’ve done it in Florida, and the Good Lord knows we need to do it in Washington, D.C., and John McCain is the right guy at the right time to make that happen.”
The Good Lord knows we need reform in Washington?
Did George W. Bush disown his younger brother after that close call with the hanging chads in 2000? Is Jeb harboring a grudge after those stories about how the Bush family expected him — not George — to follow their father as president? Did the Democrats control the White House for the past eight years, or both chambers of Congress for the first six of them?
No, Republicans did.
McCain has long considered himself a political maverick, and there’s no doubt that the Arizona senator has bucked the system — especially later in his career.
A guy who was so close to the establishment that he once had his own number in the Keating Five scandal over time has challenged the institutions of Congress with campaign finance legislation and other reform measures.
A character so prominent in his party he could credibly run for its 2000 presidential nomination was enough of a bipartisan figure that Democrat John Kerry considered McCain as a running mate during the 2004 election.
This time around, though, McCain is projecting a dual image: the outside insider. A 25-year veteran of the House and Senate, a white man like all the rest of the country’s presidents to date, McCain is trying to fend off a 44-year-old, first-term senator angling to become the first black to reach the Oval Office.
It’s prompted almost melodic speechmaking and statements.
Squeeze in, and he’s the new capital tour guide for his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
“I can’t wait to introduce her to Washington, D.C. I can’t wait,” he said to cheers Monday in Jacksonville.
Draw out, and he’s never set foot in the city himself.
“The word’s going out, my friends: The old-boy network, the pork-barrelers, the earmarkers, my friends, the word is, `Change is coming,’” McCain said. “There’s two mavericks coming to Washington, and we’re going to shake it up.”
Squeeze in, and he’s got the Washington skill set needed to right the country’s Wall Street woes.
“I was the chairman on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation for six years,” he told reporters aboard his “Straight Talk Express” campaign bus amid Monday’s market meltdown. “That’s the committee that oversights our economy — transportation, science, telecommunications, airlines — all of the factors that drive our economy.”
Draw out, and he distances himself from the administration of the Republican president who has endorsed him.
“Too many firms on Wall Street have been able to count on casual oversight by regulatory agencies in Washington. And there are so many of those regulators that the responsibility for oversight is scattered, unfocused and ineffective,” he told a rally crowd Tuesday in Tampa, Fla.
There are even times when McCain does both — squeeze in and draw out — in the same thought.
It sounds the note he hopes voters will hear on Election Day, that of the experienced newcomer.
“I know how to fix it. I know how to fix the corruption,” he said of the nation’s economic problems during an appearance Tuesday on NBC’s “Today” show. “I’ve been fighting it the whole time I’ve been in Congress.”

Posted by: AP truth | September 17, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

mccain was just at a fundraiser with his hollywood friends the other day LOL
thats funny, you know mccain is such a massive liar…
does he have Alzheimers?
he mocks obama for this fundraiser when he just attended one?
i mean who is this guy? what the hell does he think we are idiots?
mccain… wow how far you have fallen

Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I feel like Barack and I have so much in common.
What a great idea as people are losing there 401k’s?
Who is running his campaign … Elmer Fudd!
Happy days are hear again … c’mon everyone sing …

Posted by: Bob, Pittsburgh | September 17, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Hey Bhrandon:
Have you heard Barack speak off the cuff …. sounds like an idiot … stumbles over his words …. why don;t yuo think he will do town halls with McCain …. why do you think he uses a teleprompter!!
Who did McCain have at his fundraiser in Hollywood …. they could hold it at a booth in McDonalds!!

Posted by: Bob, Pittsburgh | September 17, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

McCain/Palin are now traveling on the “SNOW JOB EXPRESS” the wheels fell of the straight talk bus due to all the lying.

Posted by: polarbearkiller | September 17, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Paul
lol lol lol
did you just say Obama fits in to a group because of “lying to the public”
Have you not watched the television or internet for a few months?
or the last 8 years?
one team has been trying to keep power cover up hide distract
etc
with lies…
and they include Gramm, Palin, Cheney, Rove, McCain, Rumsfeld, Scheunneman, Gonzales, Black, and what was the dumb guy’s name…oh yeah GW Bush.
same team
same tactics
9th year
throw the bums out.

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 17, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Elitism isn’t limited to the rich. It is also the belief or attitude that certain individuals are entitled to more because of their outstanding personal abilities, intellect, experience, or other distinctive attributes and that their views are correct and should be taken more seriously or carry the most weight. There is no finer example than the Hollywood crowd most of whom were once poor and most were high school drop outs. Obama fits right in with their elitist superior attitude a poor black man with a Harvard education. Bravo! Does that give him the experience to be Commander in Chief of the United States of America? With his black racist affiliations, as far as I’m concerned we have already rewarding him to much by making him a Senator

Posted by: kay | September 17, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Oops can’t type …
why don;t yuo think he will do town halls with McCain
should be
why do you think he will not do town halls with McCain
Barack = boring cowardly professor, I Barack Obama vote “PRESENT” …. wow … my hero

Posted by: Bob, Pittsburgh | September 17, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

I can just see Obama dragging his teleprompter along to a face-off with Putin…
A ridiculous image but far better for the American people than if he tries to speak unchecked.

Posted by: marylou | September 17, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

I have never seen a posting of where all this money for Obama comes from and how it is being spent. It is ridiculous how much is being spent on campaigning. The people in Texas could sure us some of that campaign money. Hurricane Ike has left many without homes, food, and good water. We need to have some priorities in this country. RWf

Posted by: Ruby Freeman | September 17, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Bob, Pittsburgh
you obviously have never seen both the candidates speak up close and personal
mccain’s great with the pre memorized 30 second soundbite…and one follow up
Obama does well with three or four…a discussion have you…because he “gets it” in detail.
Mccain on a second follow up …does the same thing every single time
Makes a joke
gets pissed at the questioner…
or talks about his POW status.
that’s not spin that is the truth.
He doesn’t get it in detail…as his “back up can’t seem to get past one controlled interview with single pre taught 30 second sound bites…
Obama…this time …America picks the smart guy…not the slimey guy.

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 17, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Bob McCain isn’t in charge of anything but his own campaign, what he wants has no bearing on the other candidate who already had a set schedule of places hew was going. So if McCain is so interested in being with Obama mabey he should just follow him as he has on every idea Obama has put forth same as Bush.

Posted by: polarbearkiller | September 17, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

isn’t it funny
all these comments…the same slander that has been proven not true…
but they just keep lying
like the last 8 years…covering up the truth and throwing the country under the bus for power
we see Mccain and the supporters on here continue that tradition of their team…
how about the fact that the guy who wrote his economic policy is the same guy who got paid 750,000 dollars just last year to deregulate these corporations whose CEO’s got huge payouts and we now are paying 85 billion to bail out (and that is also because of Gramm and the ACT he passed in 99 that opened companies to get this big and greedy and now we can’t let fail because of all of that)
Like you all need to realize
same team
same tactics
same outcome
9th year
throw these bums out.

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 17, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

you obviously have never seen both the candidates speak up close and personal
________________________________________
YES WE HAVE.
AND OBAMA HAS NOT CONVINCED ME TO VOTE FOR HIM. I HAVE READ HIS BOOKS TOO. I AM NOT A RACIST.
WHAT ELSE HAVE YOU GOT?

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Obama, no doubt, felt comfortable with the Hollywood elite. The only fundamental shift he’s really thinking about is the shift of power into the Obama’s hands. Then follows the money. It’s Obama’s turn to get paid.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 17, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Mccain/Palin economy – Phil Gramm
He WROTE John mccain’s economic policy!
go look up who Phil Gramm is and why this mess we are in has to do with him and his writing.

Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 17, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

We need a new celebrity ad! This is perfect!
Democrat for Palin/McCain

Posted by: mike | September 17, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

I am amazed at McCain’s “solution” to the desperate financial crisis our economy finds itself in: appoint a commission. APPOINT A COMMISSION? You gotta be kidding me. The oldest DC trick in the book. Can you see that unfolding? The Commission debates and deliberates, calls witnesses, wrangles and writes a report a year later if we are lucky. What happens in the meantime? This just reinforces why McCain is dangerously out of touch with Main St.

Posted by: Wm. J. LePetomaine | September 17, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

As a Hispanic U.S. Marine and a dedicated Hillary supporter, I, too, will be voting for John McCain on November 4. Better to have a tested, trustworthy, experienced war hero as a president than someone like Barack Obama whose positions either we do not know or constantly shift. McCain 2008. Hillary 2012.

Posted by: Santiago | September 17, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

I DIDN’T KNOW THAT AYERS AND DORN HOSTED A FUNDRAISER FOR OBAMA IN 1995. SO HOW CAN OBAMA SAY HE DOES NOT EXCHANGE IDEAS WITH HIM.
OBAMA “TAKE ME AT MY JUDGMENT”
NO THANKS

Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

dl (the real one) – It is interesting how everyone is blaming the republicans. Here is why:
1. The top three U.S. senators getting big Fannie and Freddie political bucks were Democrats.
2. Top of the list was Chris Dodd, who is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.
3. Second on the list was Barack Obama.
4. Franklin Raines ran Fannie and collected $50 million (former Clinton administration’s White House Budget Director)
5. Jamie Gorelick collected $26 million (Clinton Justice Department official)
6. Jim Johnson Fannie Mae CEO was recently on Obama’s VP search committee.
7. The Clinton administration lifted the bans on sub-prime lending to allow people who could not afford housing to buy their first home.
Even Juan Williams of National Public Radio (and liberal) admitted the democrats were protecting Freddie and Fannie

Posted by: JWW09 | September 17, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Obama to small-town voters:
I feel your pain. McCain doesn’t get it because he is out of touch.
Sorry I have to cut this short–I’m off to hit up my Hollywood friends for some serious cash. I love Money!!

Posted by: riley | September 17, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

I don’t dee you right wingers putting up polls today. LMAO!!

Posted by: Joe | September 17, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Has Jake done a story about the Fannie May and Freddie Mac donations to Obama?

Posted by: Maria | September 17, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Ok Obama made $9 million dollars, so did he give any to Ike victims? None? Why did he do this fundraiser at this time during Wall Street and Ike crisis? This guy has no respect for the people who are in hardship.

Posted by: Arch | September 17, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

you know they can raise all the money they want but Obama is money hungry. I want to raise more money then anyone has ever raised, I want to be the first Black president i want i want.He wants to give 5 billion to the grate lakes who is going to pay for that? we will why doesn’t he give money to other states in need to clean up their drinking water protect the salmon . He wants to give it to the grate lakes to get their vote. If he wasn’t worried about their votes he would not be trying to get them money.He talks a good talk but when it comes down to it he doesn’t really care about the little people.His wife seems to have a problem with America in many ways. Do you really want a First Lady that hates the American people?And why is a big wig from Clintons camp going to back Mccain ? there must be something this person knows that we don’t know yet and i am sure we will find out.Mccain might be old like a lot of you are saying but i do think he loves this country more then Obama. Obama loves himself and his plans witch i haven’t really seen yet.

Posted by: will | September 17, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Said McCain: “He talks about siding with the people just before he flew off for a fundraiser in Hollywood with Barbra Streisand and his celebrity friends… Let me tell you, my friends, there’s no place I’d rather be than right here with the working men and women of Ohio.”
However, McCain spent the previous night at the Intercontinental Hotel in Miami at a $50,000 per person Republican party fundraiser that raised over $5 million.

Posted by: Keep your eyes OPEN | September 17, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Stop being haters. You know the economy sucks and people are getting poorer. McSame and Pittbull Lips have nothing to offer except lies, deceptions and more of the same. Phil Graham and McSame are de-regulators that is why we are in this mess. Rethugs takes pride in being ignorant. As President Obama said in the fundraising:
Obama asked the crowd to “keep steady”” in the remaining 48 days until Election day and to remember that his campaign “is about those who will never see the inside of a building like this and don’t resent the success that’s represented in this room, but just want the simple chance to be able to find a job that pays a living wage.”
President Obama cares for all people and is working hard for the middle class. Call it what you want but Change We Believe In is coming and Yes We Can.

Posted by: ob08 | September 17, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Listen to the celebrities they know what is best for our country. They set good examples for us with no drug abuse, alcoholism, numerous marriages and divorces, scrapes with the law, and perfect temperment. Make Mitchelle and Hollywood proud of their country for the first time – Vote Obama for uncertain change!

Posted by: kay | September 17, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Im so proud of the Hollywood Community…..We have to win ! Im working for Obama in one of our offices……I protested Viet Nam and now Im working for the most important election in our history…………I cant rest until we are now in office…That is Obama/Biden……I dont have enough time to explain how serious offensive and frightening to have Mc Cain who is a flip switch and Palin who is out of her mind in the most serious position to run this country……

Posted by: rachael weiss | September 17, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Obama and his Hollywood friends live in a different world than regular Americans.
Obama’s stump speech on gun control does not match up with his voting record. He has proven to be the most anti-gun candidate in History, voting consistently for strict gun control.
If you want to purchase a gun do it before Jan 20th. With Obama. Pelosi, Reid in control you may have a hard time getting one.

Posted by: riley | September 17, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Irishkay seems a bit angry. Maybe stay away from the action flicks for a while
would be my suggestion.
Anyway, Obama is honest enough to address the class differences in this country and the Republicans hear that as WAR! WAR!

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 17, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

So much for Change. Obama=McCain=Obama=McCain:
They are both Chumps!

Posted by: Bronx4Freedom4All | September 17, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

America’s biggest mistake? Wasn’t that voting for George Bush twice? Honestly, if Americans vote for John McCain they will have only themselves to blame. Just the same way that it’s their own fault their current President is an idiot – they elected him – twice. Though I do feel sorry for those that did not vote for him, or those that did and now regret it heavily. Just the way I will inevitably feel sorry for those that may inevitably regret voting for John McCain.

Posted by: Lisa | September 17, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Said McCain: “He talks about siding with the people just before he flew off for a fundraiser in Hollywood with Barbra Streisand and his celebrity friends… Let me tell you, my friends, there’s no place I’d rather be than right here with the working men and women of Ohio.”
However, McCain spent the previous night at the Intercontinental Hotel in Miami at a $50,000 per person Republican party fundraiser that raised over $5 million.

Posted by: Almaz | September 17, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Todd- While most of Americans are focused on legitimate issues and not lies, you can research why Russia claims the US is responsible for their attack on Georgia in an effort to help presidential candidate, McCain.

Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Yes, it takes a lot of money to defeat those who don’t want to see their free ride end – And by that I mean the lobbyists and millionaires that are supporting John McCain. Mind you, John can’t raise much money on his own, not if you’ve looked at the reports. All of his funds, and he’s getting a ton, are from the Republican Party, with added support from 527s that don’t have to tell you where they got the money. That means McCain is completely beholding to what others tell him to do. Obama has raised his own money. A great deal from small donors who have never given before. Talk about representing the people!!
I expected we’d hear a lot of Hollywood criticism today. I also expected we’d hear nothing in these reports about McCain’s fundraisers, let alone his yacht trips and millionaire club friends. I also expect more of the same when Rothschild endorses McCain later today. Just keep in mind while complaining about Hollywood “elite,” that this is yet another millionaire for McCain, who splits her time living in London and New York and is married to a royalty class international banker. And they say Obama can’t relate to them? Maybe because they’re too far up in the tax brackets to relate to any of us.

Posted by: IndeVoter | September 17, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Foomonkey,
I appreciate your civility.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

$28,500 per plate? I hope they didn’t skimp on the Hamburger Helper.

Posted by: mst3kster | September 17, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Dear Todd:
That story is so explosive that it would tank Obama’s already stalled campaign.
Something the media is not about to do. In their harts, most reporters and editors want Obama to win.
They (except a few like Olbermann) will keep up the pretense of impartiality, but would never pursue a story that meant the end for Obama.

Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | September 17, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Not buying the Barbra hatin’ from you Jake.

Posted by: Lisa S | September 17, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Keep your eyes OPEN – Exaggerating on the 50,000 aren’t you? Started out at 10,000. If you’re willing to let these elitist wealthy determine who will care for your pocket book then you are in a lot of trouble. His comments were very demeaning to the ordinary person. Shows how much he cares for the economy. Only if it goes in his pocket. You might ought to go in with your EYES WIDE OPEN. Once again, says one thing on the west coast and another on the campaign trail. I really can’t believe he thinks people are that stupid because they are not. Now these idiots protesting on McCains lawn need to ask Obama for a home or to send some money to the downtroden in Texas and Louisiana. McCain and Palin will win!!

Posted by: C Good | September 17, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Obama fits into this group very well. They and Obame pretend to be what they are not. Their incomes depend on these people who are suffering from the bad economy. They take ungodly sums from them and then give a small sum of it to him who will use the money to keep these same people dependent on ghe government by contributing $28,500 plus $2500 per person to the Democratic national committee/Obama for America joint Victory Fund.
Obama says he is the change candidate yet he and his top committy men were the top 3 recipinet of Fanny/Friede May.

Posted by: Curly | September 17, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Neither candidate is worth a hil of beans. But Palin is pretty darn good, which is why many will vote for McCain. Anyone who thinks Obama is terrific needs to do some research. He is just like all the others, maybe worse. His ties to the Chicago political machine. His lack of experience. His tremendous EGO . His anti-Americanism and his wifes….all combine to cost him the election. That’s it….end of story.

Posted by: mary | September 17, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Has it occured to anyone that these fund raising events are just a way to circumvent election law by allowing individuals to buy dinners at some real ugly price. Also, dinner cost more than many Americans earn in a year. I am pleased by the media’s naming event attendees, makes it easier for me to avoid them. Making a list and checking it twice.

Posted by: 1post3 | September 17, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

“Obama has an economic plan” Other than raising taxes, what plan? Obama offers nothing but platitudes. He truely is an empty suit…What I find ironic with Palins so-called “troopergate,” is that Obama has never held a position where he could fire a public employee. And who has the more executive experience?

Posted by: Jim | September 17, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Tell me something. I read a report a couple days ago about where Obama was getting some of his online donations from.He was getting donations from other country’s and was excepting them.Obama said he didn’t know but the report said he did.It’s against the rule to except donations from other country’s when you are running for Office in the United States from what I read. Why is this just being dropped and not looked into more. They have the proof of the donations. I guess from what I read Obama said he would give it to charity. How would we know he really did or is it just talk?. I guess we will never really know.

Posted by: sue | September 17, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Everyone knows Obama doesn’t care about real people.
OBAMA=ELITIST

Posted by: reason | September 17, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

I’ve lived in Texas all my life. I like fishing, drinking beer, and Jesus. I don’t dislike Palin, but I don’t think I want her to be my President.

Posted by: Andrea | September 17, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

IrishKay – No,Mccain just passes legislation that keeps the middle class struggling. Do you think he works on that in one of his 7 homes or driving the car he can’t remember what the model is?

Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

The big zero fits in well with the Hollywood crowd as they are all playing roles; they are all acting. Obama is acting as if he could be President when we ALL know he is not ready, and the rest us know what a bunch of phoneys and losers and charlatans the rest of that Hollywood crowd is. Makes you squirm as a normal American that the zero fits in so well there. Just goes to show you what a fake he really is.

Posted by: John Galt | September 17, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Russia did what they did to get back in the game of power. Who”s country is bigger.To say they did it to back Mccain is stupid.Putin doesn’t even like Mccain because Mccain will not back down. But in one report he did say he liked Obama because Obama would not take action. look it up i am sure the report is still out there somewhere if you look hard.

Posted by: mat | September 17, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Kay,
I don’t understand why you think being elite leads to elitism. I want my president and all his advisers to be elite. I want them to be the smartest, most well read, most well traveled, most most-est people we can find.
What is argument for a less elite president? Should be find the most average among us and put them in charge of the most complicated government in the world?
I understand your dislike for elitism. Believing you deserve more, without working for it, because you are smarter than everyone else is definitely elitist. And it is certainly true that being elitist does not require you to be elite: you can be a dumb elitist too.
But undeserved gains are not the same thing as deserving more because you worked for it, or because you worked for it smarter than everyone else. That simply means you are a being rewarded for your efforts. As capitalists, we should applaud when people reap the just rewards of their efforts.
There is another part of elitism too. The part where you know what’s better for someone because you think you are smarter than they are. Nobody likes being told what’s good for them.
But how do you even govern if you don’t have opinions about what is good and bad? Don’t you end up calling every politician an elitist or not, depending on whether you agree with their opinions or not?
So, if you want to make an argument that one politician or the other is elitist, you need to show that their gains were not from their efforts. We already know that you won’t agree with the opinions from half the candidates.
Personally, I don’t think any of the presidential or vice presidential candidates got some where with out working for it. I think some have had an easier road than other, but I think that is fate and age, rather than elitism.
And I think discussing elitism distracts us from discussing the policies we disagree with.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Glad to see such sacrifice when when are in the great depression II.

Posted by: geevill | September 17, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

More “good for me but not for thee” from the Double Talk Express.
It’s elitist for Obama to have Barbra Streisand perform at a $28,500 per person fundraiser in LA. McCain, on the other hand, is a genuine “man of the people” while he’s at a $50,000 per person fund raiser in Miami.
What crap. Are there any real issues that Rethuglicans can campaign on instead of spending their time generating this kind of creepily hypocritical nonsense?

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 17, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

“I think it’s interesting how the McCain supporters are so quick to criticize the Hollywood crowd. You might want to check how much money these people actually give to charity. They are some of the most generous people in the world, often giving money anonymously. With the amount of money they make they should all be Republicans because economically they would be better off voting with that party. Think about it.”
If I remember correctly, looking at Bidens Tax Returns, he gave less than $400 to charity…hmmm

Posted by: JFK | September 17, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

What’s the fuzz. Both parties are fund raising but Obama is a better fund raiser. So stop whining.

Posted by: ENVY | September 17, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Good for them for taking an interest in politics and promoting a candidate. Does this sway me in anyway to support a candidate? No. Obama’s still tied or behind in the polls so obviously, he can bring in all the money he wants. It still doesn’t change whether people will vote for him.

Posted by: MajorTom | September 17, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Truther – “NY POST opinion” as fact? Thanks, but no thanks.

Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Barack Obama’s attempt to shake off the celebrity status only cements this image as a celebrity elitist with such a fund raiser. I sense desperation is in the air for the Obama-Biden ticket.
Senator John Kerry & Vice President Al Gore made similar errors in 2004 & 2000 respectively. Furthermore, when a Clinton voter tells the press Barack Obama is elitist & out-of-touch, it only compounds the mysterious rise of Barack Obama as a man who refuses to answer questions about his dubious past with Bill Ayers & Reverend Wright.
I do not trust Senator Obama since he folds, flips, & flops on fundamental issues at the drop of a hat. The man has no backbone. He only has ambition & a lust for power.

Posted by: Sebastian Shaw | September 17, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

OBAMA/BIDEN08

Posted by: terryswifey | September 17, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

Obama not only has the “out of touch Hollywood liberal Elite Snobs”, He is also looking to the other end of the spectrum for votes. EX CONVICTS
This is a story that’s been largely ignored by members of the mainstream media, but there is good evidence that Team Obama is actively targeting former felons in their voter registration efforts.
This effort makes sense for Obama politically if he can keep it quiet. There’s little doubt that former felons would lean heavily in his direction. The problem is, well, it’s a problem if the public finds out about it. So far the mainstream media have done their part by not covering this story.
A New York Times article admitted Obama’s camp has received briefings from the left-wing experts on registering felons. Why would Obama want these briefings if they weren’t interested in the subject?
One Obama campaign office had a sign in the window saying “Felons Can Vote” before they wisely removed it. And it’s clear that some of Obama’s allies are busy registering felons to vote for him.

Posted by: Badger | September 17, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Truther – Here is some “real” truth: Amir Taheri is a notorious fraudster. He was once powerful under the Shah’s regime but now is an Iranian exile and neocon shill. Taheri has been exposed repeatedly for simply making things up to fit his political agenda. For example, in May 2006 he published a report in the National Post (Canada) falsely stating that a new Iranian law required Jews to wear special clothing and yellow patches to identify themselves in public. The paper had to retract the story, blaming Taheri, and apologize for it. Taheri’s reputation, already extremely low in 2006, has been in the dirt ever since. – unbossed

Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Political donations are not charity and are not write offs, unless of course your Charles Rangel, who does what he wants.

Posted by: J.S. | September 17, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Paige,
I dont care if charles manson wrote the piece, its backed up by FACTS if charles manson said 2+2=4 and obama said 2+2=5, you dont choose obamas explanation when you know manson got the facts right.

Posted by: Truther | September 17, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

We are know that Obama is an elitist and a want-to-be celebrity. All the hollywood folk could support any candidate and it wouldn’t influence me in the least!

Posted by: StLouisMan | September 17, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Truther says “I dont care if charles manson wrote the piece”
_________________________________________
Your post says it all. Have a nice day.

Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

The answer is still this: If you are happy with the way things have gone the past 8 years, then go on and put Senator McCain in office. If you want to bet on another “horse”, vote for Obama!

Posted by: Chrissy | September 17, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

You may not like felons, rehabilitated or otherwise, but voting is a right of a citizen, just like free speech and owning a gun, and I don’t think you can pick and choose which parts of the Constitution to obey.
Like it or not, felons who have not had their voting rights stripped, or who have had their voting right reinstated are allowed to vote.
I’m sure the ex-CEO of Enron, Jeff Skilling, will get his vote back once he is rehabilitated, just as Hippy McPotSmoker will once he is no longer a threat to society.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

“Barack Obama’s attempt to shake off the celebrity status only cements this image as a celebrity elitist with such a fund raiser. I sense desperation is in the air for the Obama-Biden ticket.”
How bad can the economy be if people can afford to pay $28,500 for dinner. Those liberals sure are rich. I wonder if they donated the leftover caviar to the food bank?

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Obama is wasting his time and money putting ads that he’s the one to solve the economic mess. He started as a celebrity with meassianic speeches, then opted out of public financing, and then he mingles with Hollywwod celebrities for $$$ fundraisers while the rest are suffering. Sorry he cannot feel our pain.

Posted by: zoilodel | September 17, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

“You may not like felons, rehabilitated or otherwise, but voting is a right of a citizen, just like free speech and owning a gun, and I don’t think you can pick and choose which parts of the Constitution to obey.”
You know you are scraping at the bottom of the barrel when you need to make a play for the felon vote. Felons for Obama?

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Lets be honest. most of america isn’t ready for a black president yet. Some of us are. And some of us aren’t. We will see what happens
McCain 08
and
Obama 08
By the way, I’m black!

Posted by: Norman Evans | September 17, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Mack,
There must be some attraction of Senator Obama to the people willing to pay $28,500 for dinner? Senator Obama is the candidate promising to raise the taxes of every one of those diners.
Why wouldn’t they give their money to Senator McCain instead? I’m sure the diners like their money. There must be another reason.
I think the most obvious reason rich people are willing to part with their lovely money is they agree with the policies of the candidate.
Senator Obama offers a vision of the United States that is more compelling to the rich than money. I think that deserves a little more attention than the effort it take to hurl another insult.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Chrissy
I am not that disappointed wit the last 8 years, but I am with the last 2 years under a democrat controlled congress. I’m sorry what is their approval rating again? Less than Bush? This tieing McCain to Bush, and the current economy is totally weak, and will not work. I have no doubt that McCain, and Palin are far more likely to bring POSITIVE change, than the most liberal senator in the senate with his 97% left voting record would bring. No big government, no tax and spend liberals, No Way Nobama

Posted by: Badger | September 17, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

“Lets be honest. most of america isn’t ready for a black president yet. Some of us are. And some of us aren’t.”
It seems that some Americans aren’t ready for a woman President or VP for that matter.

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

Mack,
I think the whole discussion of felons is completely off the mark. Isn’t it a reincarnation of Willie Horton? Isn’t that form of discussion about as useful as “Big Oil for McCain”?
Who cares where a candidate goes to get votes? Let’s concentrate on what a candidates policies will do for and to America once they take the reins.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Hooray for Hollywood, right Obama?
No — you’re not a celebrity, you are a
Celebrity for the celebrities.
How about us?! The REAL people of America?!

Posted by: Angelo | September 17, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Badger,
Could you give us some examples of the action or inaction you have seen in the last two years, and how those decisions affected you?
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

wake up people–most republicans and democrates have sold us out. so the only issue is the prolife issue for moral voters. obama is for infanticde. if you vote for him his sins upon those born and left to die will be on your head–his guilt will become yours

Posted by: cisc | September 17, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Arch,
He can’t stop. And, you really don’t know what he has done on a personal basis. Why, he may have made a donation, but that’s not something that he would and should make public. WHY? YOU ASK. Because then you would say that he’s doing to gain votes. So the bigger question Arch, is, WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?

Posted by: fempharoh08 | September 17, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

Note, Joe wasn’t invited. I don’t think Joe fits in with the Obama, Pelosi, Streisand types. He was probably having a beer somewhere..or maybe he just went home.

Posted by: rktsci3127 | September 17, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

For most of you who put comments here, at least have the respect and call him SENATOR OBAMA, you call SENATOR MCAIN by that.
AND YOU WILL SEE, HE WILL WIN
OBAMA/BIDEN 08

Posted by: MILLIE | September 17, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

You mean Junior Senator Obama.
I think McCain earned the right to be called SENATOR, from his, you know,
experience.

Posted by: Angelo | September 17, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

You mean Junior Senator Obama.
McCain earned the title SENATOR, by his,
you know, experience.

Posted by: Angelo | September 17, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

The stock markets are crashing. There’s financial doom and gloom everywhere as millions of Americans are losing their retirement incomes and where’s Obama?
He’s right at home eating his arugula with his millionaire celebrity friends.

Posted by: OxyCon | September 17, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

ABC is biased toward O Hussein Obama and is slick to pick out and cut out parts of posts they don’t like.
He is a bumbling, stumbling speaker that is now traveling with his teleprompter and professionally written speeches.
Palin has more/better experience and this has thrown him off.
He has been a Senator a short time but has spent only a fews on the job, collected his huge salary, health benefits, etc. at our expense.

Posted by: DS | September 17, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

to abc, is this the best you can do on reporting. you put yourself right there in the light of a second rate news agency. this type of reporting does nothing more than fuel the fire of fear and desperation that is expressed in the comments post here. the media, once informative is now just another form of special interest. your lack of reporting that the other guy will end Monday at a private (how come his fundraiser’s are private, is that why no reporting) fundraiser at the Intercontinental Hotel in Miami. Donors will pay as much as $50,000 to have dinner with the Republican nominee. if your going to tell a story, tell the whole story.

Posted by: mike southern nj | September 17, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

People, please check factcheck.org out, mccain has told so many lies it sickening, anything to get the sheep to vote for him, for him to say he is now for regulations on these banks, when he consistantly said he was against regulations in the past is a joke. My whole family is voting for Obama 08…its time for change NOW…not 4 more years of the same…or worse

Posted by: Terri for change | September 17, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

McCain’s sleazy campaign of lobbyists and golden parachute recipients should never call anyone “elitist”. This is the same campaign being run by lobbyists, fronted by a guy who cheated on his wife with a rich woman and now owns nine houses and thinks that the economy is doing well. This is the campaign that hired Carly Fiorina as an economic advisor after she flushed HP into the toilet and got a huge severence package when they fired her. It’s very apparent which candidate is representing the elite…the one that wants more tax cuts for the rich while sticking it to the middle class. McCain’s the elitist, plain and simple.

Posted by: Karl | September 17, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

McCain was a victim not a Hero, it was a long time ago, he is no more of a hero then the actors on “SURVIVOR” he needs to get over himself and his trophy wifes! dont elect a keating five, polar bear hatin, end of the World lovin, flipflopping old man!

Posted by: philosopherkingtomas | September 17, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

So what if members of hollywood have alot of money and want to donate it to obama’s campaign? I personally am very very grateful that they are willing to donate this kind of money. With all of the donations that the republicans are getting from big oil and other big corporations, its hard to raise enough money to keep up. Why should he discriminate against someone’s donation, based solely on their level of income? They believe in his fight and want to help… but he doesn’t have to pay them back afterwards by keeping laws in their favor or raping us at the gas pumps.

Posted by: Laura S | September 17, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

we have met the enemy and they are us.”McCain Attacks Washington, Republicans, Old White Men with White HairMost Ironic Speech to Date, Experts SayIn what some political observers are calling his most ironic speech of the 2008 campaign, GOP presidential nominee John McCain today lashed out at Washington, the Republican Party and a group of insiders he called “old white men with white hair.”"It’s time to take our country back,” Sen. McCain told his audience in Dayton, Ohio. “It’s time to send a message to those in power – those Republicans in Washington, those old white men with their combed-over white hair.”Sen. McCain went on to attack the power elite on Wall Street, calling them “wealthy plutocrats with private jets and too many houses to keep track of.”"The time has come to say enough is enough to those rich old white men,” he said. “And the same goes to their zombie-like trophy wives who plaster their makeup on like trollops.”Responding to the nation’s economic turmoil, Sen. McCain said that as President he would create millions of jobs “by putting Americans to work making negative ads.”"We no longer lead the world in manufacturing cars, steel, or computers,” Sen. McCain said. “But our negative ad industry is second to none.”In other economic news, President Bush announced another massive bailout today, saying that he had completed a deal for China to buy the United States in its entirety.”This was a difficult deal to pull off,” Mr. Bush acknowledged. “The hard part was identifying the parts of the U.S. that China didn’t already own.”

Posted by: Tharealness | September 17, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch are the biggest donors to OBAMA presidential campaigns……this is the CHANGE……..WAKEUP AMERICA…..

Posted by: peter | September 17, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

OBAMA is nothing more than HOLLYWOOD ENDROSEMENT!
OBAMA=HOLLYWOOD ENDROSEMENT

Posted by: Alexa | September 17, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

This whole thing sounds like one of those KID games, My dog is bigger than yours.
George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years. The first six the economy
was fine.
About the time Obama was elected to the US Senate and the Dems became the majority in Congress two years ago:
1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 yr. high;
2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon;
3) the unemployment rate was 4.5%;
4) the DOW JONES hit a record high–14,000 +
5) Americans were buying new cars, taking cruises, vacationing
overseas, living large!…
But Americans wanted ‘CHANGE’! So, in 2006 they voted in a Democratic
Congress & yep–we got ‘CHANGE’ all right!…..
1) Consumer confidence has plummeted;
2) Gasoline is now nearly $4 gallon and climbing;
3) Unemployment is up over 5%.
4) Americans have seen their home equity drop by $12 TRILLION
DOLLARS & prices are still dropping;
5) 1% of American homes are in foreclosure; and
6) THE DOW is probing another low~~11,300–$2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS
HAS EVAPORATED FROM THEIR STOCKS, BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT
PORTFOLIOS!
YEP , IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE!…AND WE SURE GOT IT!!!….
NOW THE POLLS SAY OBAMA IS GONNA BE ‘THE MAN’–CLAIMS HE’S GONNA REALLY
GIVE US CHANGE!!….
JUST HOW MUCH MORE ‘CHANGE’ DO YA THINK WE CAN STAND???…..

Posted by: Gene | September 17, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

He is hanging with Celebs, how is that seeing eye to eye with the middle class! Change, BS, More like that is what will be left of your paychecks.

Posted by: bpercival | September 17, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

It is good to know that the movie stars are protected under his policies.

Posted by: bpercival | September 17, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Is it all about, Hollywood, celebrity and money, or Washington DC, presidency and a dangerous world? Look at who is supporting whom, his or her own values, not just fame and wealth, and maybe we can tell the character of a candidate.

Posted by: Still Undecided | September 17, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I am not an Obama supporter although I do admire a few things about him and his family. I will say however, that he did use some intelligence when he turned down the campaign support of none other than Lindsey Lohan, the 22 year old dimwitt who can only serve best as a poster child for reckless behavior and rehab! What makes this young starlett, and I do use that term with extreme prejudice, suddenly think that she is an expert in world politics? She can’t even take care of her own affairs let alone discuss world affairs. Lindsey….do yourself a favor, stop embarrassing yourself and all of the rest of us Americans and go back to rehab for, oh lets say, about the next 25 years! And please, I am begging you, leave the politics of the world to the people with an IQ over 60. I am an Engineer and I am not foolish enough to dabble in something that I do not belong in!

Posted by: Jack | September 17, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

My fellow americans….what’s the big deal of Senator Obama raising money in Hollywood for his campaign? Everyone knows he refuse to accept loan money from the demoncratic party….so he is getting his campaign funds else where and so is Senator McCain….Senator McCain was in Florida last week doing his fundraising and not a mumbling word was said……Everyone should go ahead and admit they are racist and Senator Obama no matter how hard he is trying to bring all americans together as one american will be damn if he do and damn if he don’t.

Posted by: Della1 | September 17, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

They’re all fundraising like this. Go Obama!

Posted by: Sandra | September 17, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Over the course of the last 19 months I have evolved to the point I am at today. That is… I automatically do not believe one word Obama says! It has happened so slowly but my mind has processed all that I have read (his books), all that I have heard (his speeches and his political ads, etc) and all that I have watched (his intermingling with crowds, other candidates and journalists) and I feel that he offers…. NOTHING! Absolutely nothing to help this country. In fact, I am truly afraid that he may do real damage to this country by bringing back racial divide to make matters even worse than they are. His religious beliefs are frightening. I don’t believe that alot of his campaign promises (you know, the ones he changes daily) will be kept. I just do not see one reason to vote for Obama. McCain & Palin are much more the party with change we can believe in. I am so glad he chose Sarah Palin. My only other choice was to not vote since Obama was never an option.

Posted by: Voting for McCain because of Palin | September 17, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Are you saying that McCain never had attended to private fundraisers for himself? He is just jealous…just like he was screaming about Obama’s “celebrity”….yet, not a mention about Palin’s “celebrity!” What a crock! What hypocrit! NOW, he is for change? Obama has been saying “CHANGE” for 19 months and all of a sudden, McCain is for change. He needs to make up his mind! By the way, where is the uproar on how much Cindy spends monthly on her credit card?($500,00+). The Republicans sure did give Teresa Kerry hell about her inheritance 4 years ago. We don’t hear about the Democrats grumbling on Cindy’s extravance and expensive taste. Each outfit she wears probably could fund 10 families in a rural area.

Posted by: RO | September 17, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

“What makes this young starlett, and I do use that term with extreme prejudice, suddenly think that she is an expert in world politics”
Most of them haven’t graduated from High School, let alone College. Only a dimwit would be influenced by the likes of Lohan, Matt Damon and Chevy Chase.

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

It is amazing how ignorant some people can be sometimes. Barack is raising money on his own. He refused to use the tax-payers money. Of course he has to go to the big wallets to raise some money. Do you know what was McCain doing the night before Obama’s party…. the same thing, in a fancy hotel raising 5 million dollars. He is such a hypocrite!!
People wake up!!!! read, learn, get involved.

Posted by: Stacy | September 17, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

What’s the fuzz. Both parties are raising funds but Obama does it better. So stop whining.

Posted by: ENVY | September 17, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

A man who can’t even manage to buy his own children a home without his money men, now pretends he can solve a financial crisis while being heavily funded by those very same people?
I dare you Obama supporters to take a trip to his district at night. Check out what type of change Obama has in store for you.
Obama and Michelle helped to steal proper housing, schooling, and medical care from their neighbors.
Why would you want to subject this man to YOUR neighbors?
Chicago has the highest local taxes and gas taxes in the nation thanks to grifters like Obama and the rest of the Chicago Machine stealing from the people.
You want that type of man as your representative….then move to Chicago.
And don’t force him on the rest of us who actually read more than his website to gather info on his actions.

Posted by: Karma | September 17, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

So what the Sen. Obama had a fundraiser, so did Sen. McCain. Obama when to Hollywood and McCain when to Florida.. Obama had a great meal and McCain had what food.. Don’t blame Obama because he when to Hollywood to get his money.. McCain took money from us to ran his campaign… McCain needs to stay on the issues at hand oppose to running negative ads on TV. Don’t blame the chaos on Obama, but blame if on Father Bush. So Sen/President Obama keep doign what you are doing… CHANGE is at Hand.. And Stand UP for ALL People, like I know that you will…

Posted by: So What | September 17, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

My fellow Americans I watch with horror everyday of what will come next. You cant be seroius and tell me that this economy does not affect you. I know it affects me and my future children to come. Barack Obama has never accepted money from the lobbyist and the Democratic party because he believes in the American people. He believe that each one can help one and that is the foundation to begin healing in this wonderful country. It starts by donating the $25 each to his campaign so that we can start building back what use to be a safe and strong economy. What better way to prove that he believes in the American people than to use our donation to defeat the greed over the years by these Wall Street CEO’s. Americans should be happy to take part in this drive to raise money and strongly say no to lobbyist and no to watching our future going down the drain. OBAMA-BIDEN.

Posted by: Fiona | September 17, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

“I dare you Obama supporters to take a trip to his district at night. Check out what type of change Obama has in store for you.”
Exactly. He has done absolutely nothing there. What has he done there that you can say has made a difference? It’s more dangerous than Iraq. If he can’t get anything accomplished on a smaller scale how in the world is he gong to do it on a country wide scale. All talk, no action.

Posted by: Mack | September 17, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

I honestly think thay must pay you to say stuff like that.

Posted by: Fiona | September 17, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

obama = people’s champ

Posted by: righteousbrother | September 17, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

At least the Hollywood elite are milking the taxpayers’ dollars through corporate welfare and corporate food stamps.

Posted by: Working in Texas | September 17, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Obama had a fundraiser in California that netted him 9 million. McCain had one in Miami with big wigs that netted him 5 million. McCain’s fundraiser was with those who could very likely influence policy. Obama’s not. Also, Palin had a 1 million fundraiser with some CEO in Ohio who laid off all his employees and shipped the jobs overseas. Gee, think I’ll stand with Obama on this one. And repubs, why so down on Hollywood types…you seem to have forgotten Reagan, Arnold and Thompson.

Posted by: nullandvoid | September 17, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Explain to me again how it is that McCain, who accepted $85 million in public financing, is raising money in Miami and around the nation for the Republican National Committee, which in turn is using that money to advance McCain’s campaign? How is that ethical?

Posted by: Working in Texas | September 17, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I find it odd the media doesn’t cover McCain’s $50,000 a plate event in Florida, where firefighters and police were in attendance. They must pay them pretty well in Florida for them to afford $50,000 a plate dinner.

Posted by: deb | September 17, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

“It is amazing how ignorant some people can be sometimes. Barack is raising money on his own. He refused to use the tax-payers money. Of course he has to go to the big wallets to raise some money. Do you know what was McCain doing the night before Obama’s party…. the same thing, in a fancy hotel raising 5 million dollars. He is such a hypocrite!!
People wake up!!!! read, learn, get involved.
Posted by: Stacy | Sep 17, 2008 1:56:22 PM”
Uh….Stacy.
The ‘taxpayer’s money’ that Obama is saving us is the $3 box you VOLUNTARILY check on your tax returns.
So, if you didn’t check that box, which I suspect is the case. Neither candidate has YOUR money or any other citizens who didn’t VOLUNTARILY check the box.
However, that $3 prevents the candidates from selling favors for the money they collect and is meant to give them time to focus on the election.
Obama is the ONLY candidate since it was developed to forgo the money. He isn’t doing you a favor by not taking it.
Take your own advice and read they also point out the voluntary donation.
“What is its purpose?
The primary purpose of the fund is to reduce the role of large amounts of private money raised in the presidential campaign and the obligations that are, or can appear to be, associated with those contributions.
The system was created in the 1970′s in response to the Watergate scandals that surrounded the Nixon re-election campaign when his campaign committee was found to have illegally received hundreds of thousands of dollars from some of the country’s largest corporations. Congress responded by passing sweeping campaign finance reform, which included the presidential public financing system designed to minimize a candidate’s dependence on donations from wealthy special interests.
But the presidential public financing system isn’t just designed to stop corruption, or the appearance of corruption. It is also designed to increase competition for candidates who may not have a broad network of large contributors or a large amount of personal wealth, as well as free up time to allow candidates to get their message out to voters instead of constantly raising money.”

Posted by: Karma | September 17, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Meanwhile, Sarah Palin hid from reporters (and their pesky questions) in a deep underground bunker.

Posted by: C. Daly | September 17, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Actors earn dozens of millions of dollars to do a movie. They are millionaires and will be affected by Obama’s tax plan. However, they support him, because if middle class doesn’t have money, movies don’t sell. Obama is not using party’s funds for his campaign, is just contributions from individuals, from Lehman and Merril Lynch EMPLOYEES, not lobbyists, not corporations with hidden interests to influence legislation in their favor. It is perfectly fine to do a fundraiser of 30K a plate when we make these people ridiculously rich.

Posted by: Charles | September 17, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Unfortunately the DEMS got it wrong,
they should have nominated Hillary Clinton. Obama knows that, that is why he snubbed her for VP. And now he is paying dearly for that inexperienced decision he made. Don’t let him make the same inexperienced decisions as President.

Posted by: Angelo | September 17, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

I have been a democrat all my live. This time I am voting for McCain/Palin ’08. I just love that woman. She is so full of energy and will really shake things up in Washington. I guess you can call me a Palin democrat.

Posted by: janetwillow | September 17, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

So Obama’s biggest donors are Hollywood, Merill Lynch, Lehman Bros, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac? He keeps good company.

Posted by: Saint | September 17, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

But the presidential public financing system isn’t just designed to stop corruption, or the appearance of corruption. It is also designed to increase competition for candidates who may not have a broad network of large contributors or a large amount of personal wealth, as well as free up time to allow candidates to get their message out to voters instead of constantly raising money.”
I agree
And to see Obama does both is quite commendable…raising money and a very effective running a campaign….

Posted by: Fiona | September 17, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Nullandvoid…then check out the totals Obama has raised from the various industries.
Banking and lawyers, Obama is their number one guy.
Really it is so easy to check up on these claims why do you guys accept Obama lying to you so often?
He even claimed he was on the banking committee a short time ago. He really isn’t…but once again was taking credit for work he didn’t do. I bet he doesn’t claim that committee now.
Oh and ask yourself why did McCain speak out against Freddie and Fannie in 2005? While Obama is number 2 on their list of fully bought and paid for politicians?

Posted by: Karma | September 17, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

have been a democrat all my live. This time I am voting for McCain/Palin ’08. I just love that woman. She is so full of energy and will really shake things up in Washington.
Yeah right!!!!
After having a passport for only what 2-3 years and showing off her pregnant daughter like teen pregancy is ok….great choise people….

Posted by: Fiona | September 17, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

From what I pick up in the above lines is racism deep down in some people, it is so bad that people should be like this, please people let go, times have changed and will continue to change. When a blackman works hard, goes to the best schools and becomes productive in the society, he is “Elitist”. When he promises to bring about change they want to sideline him, they say he is someone they do not know yet they talk about em ..whats her name .. Palin! for cry out loud do you know who Palin is? Because of all the unfairness as an independent candidate i will vote for Obama, he is the only one the spells out the true change.

Posted by: plunket | September 17, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Fiona,
You seem to have some facts confused. Obama dropped out of the public financing after promising not to.
While he is busy gathering money for his campaign all the other down ticket Democrats are begging for money that normally comes from the DNC.
Reid, the Senate Majority leader was denied funds by the Obama campaign to help those other politicians. Which is unusual.
So no, Obama has actually done neither effective fund raising or helping his fellow Dems.
His only support consists of lending his name and his wife’s name to the down ticket literature.
Which is political suicide since it is Congress that actually approves of Presidential programs.
As well as the possibly loss of Dem seats in hard fought districts. Even more political suicide then upset and fund starved Dems is Republicans taking those seats thanks to Obama’s greed and poor fund distribution plans.

Posted by: Karma | September 17, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Plunkett, anyone who votes for Obama just because he is black, is racist.
Get it?

Posted by: Angelo | September 17, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Why do the militant feminists hate Sarah Palin so much???
Don’t they like the idea of a woman as VP. It sure seems that they are not interested in what the majority of women here think but are just looking out for their own interests. These militants don’t speak for me.
I love Sarah Palin.
You Go Girl!!!!

Posted by: Women4Palin | September 17, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Barack Obama backed out of campaign reform for this very reason. He thinks he can buy the presidency. Campaign reform was supposed to help eliminate the possibility of that. John McCain kept his promise. Which candidate can you trust to keep the rest of their promises? Lies become habit, broken promises are going to be painful for middle Americans, not Hollywood types. Barack Obama should go into acting or speech writing, not politics. He fails every time except for putting on a good show.

Posted by: Wild | September 17, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

And now he is paying dearly for that inexperienced decision he made. Don’t let him make the same inexperienced decisions as President.
Yeah right…
So instead you vote for a man who has the 25years of experience which bring us this type of economic crisis….great thinking….

Posted by: Fiona | September 17, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

As far as big companies being in the tank for Obama, for those of you who have never donated to a campaign and dont’s understand. Whether you donate a $1,00 or $1,000 you have to list who your employer is. So it’s the employees of these companies donating. But the lobbist from Lehman’s,Merril Lynch,Fannie and Freddie etc are running McCain’s campaign. Something the media hasn’t covered much is the Military is donating to Obama by a 6 to 1 margin. Do some research and look up Keating 5,the S&L scandal, you’ll see just how dirty McCain’s hands are in deregulating the banking industry.

Posted by: deb | September 17, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Fiona,
The President does not control the economy, in fact, congress makes more of the decisions that effect the economy. Sorry.
Yeah Right!

Posted by: angelo | September 17, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

So America suffers while Obama rakes it in. Didn’t his campaign say that the reason he reversed himself on capaign financing was that he has already achieved equalness that his donors were just in $100 increments. Looks like he still has to stop campaigning to shop for his big hollywood donors. So much for his new politics, seams like the same old thing to me.

Posted by: Randy | September 17, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

OxyCon,
Arugula? That’s what you base your choice in president on … arugula?
I’m not a huge fan of arugula, so I base my choice for leader of the free world on underwear type, favorite jellybean flavors, and whether their mother loved them.
You are doing your country harm … we are all doing our country harm … when we repeat campaign-created sound bites and hurl insults at each other.
Pick any topic — health care, taxes, war, the environment, the economy, education, foreign trade … pick anything and start having a conversation with you fellow citizens about how changes in policy will affect the United States and why that effect will be good or bad.
Think for yourself, and trust the rest of us to do the same.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Deb.
Apparently you haven’t checked out WHO donated at those large corps, and it is obvious that you’ve never worked in corporate America.
Here is how it goes. The President of the company donates, so does his wife, of age children, aunts, uncles, cousins, friends, etc. The Board of Directors also gets their families to donate. All of the upper level executives and management and their families donate the $2300 limit.
The company wide memo is sent to gently suggest that the other employees also donate stating reasons why the company supports the candidate.
Making clear that donating isn’t required since that would make it illegal.
However, usually the donation is collected at work somehow and isn’t mailed from your living room. So the employees know that it will look good if they donate the same way the President of the company, the Board of Directors, the Executive and Management staff have. And make that donation from their desks.
Hope that helps to explain if you see $300,000 from a company. How that trickle down thing works as well as what that memo inspires.
Not everyone who donated would be registered as working with that company since they are relatives, working elsewhere.
Funding the Convention and donations to the DNC or RNC are much higher limits.
The cycle can start all over again.

Posted by: Karma | September 17, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Don’t they like the idea of a woman as VP. It sure seems that they are not interested in what the majority of women here think but are just looking out for their own interests. These militants don’t speak for me.
I love Sarah Palin.
You Go Girl!!!!
Dont get me wrong I like the idea of a woman being Vice-President, just not one that beleives in this: -
McCain voted against The Equal Pay Bill for Women. He said
women ‘need education and training’ instead. [Source: aflcio.org; H.R. 2831,
Vote 110, 4/23/08; Associated Press, 4/28/08]
Palin wants to outlaw abortion, including for victims of rape or incest.
McCain voted against the family and medical leave act, making it
hard for women and men to take time from work to care for loved
ones.[Source: aflcio.org S.Amdt. 16, S. 5, Vote 7, 2/4/93; H.R. 1, Vote 11, 2/4/93]
Palin wants to teach creationism in the schools, making it harder for
our teachers to compete with up-and-coming nations in science
education.
McCain opposed spending to prevent unintended and teen
pregnancies.
Palin does not believe that humans contribute to global warming
and she wants to take the polar bear off of the endangered species
list so she can drill for oil in Alaska.
McCain opposed legislation requiring that abstinence-only
programs be medically accurate and scientifically based.
McCain’s health care plan will require that benefits be taxed, the first
time this would ever happen in America’s history. This will make it
next to impossible to pay high medical bills with insurance benefits.
During Palin’s time as mayor, Wasilla was the only town in Alaska to
charge rape victims for rape kits essential to finding their assailants

Posted by: Fiona | September 17, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Hollywood is America. The Hollywood Elite would not be where they are at without superior intellegence. Change in 08.

Posted by: WSRM for BO | September 17, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Obama could not raise that kind of money in Illinois. We are Broke!

Posted by: bpercival | September 17, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm

This post probably will be moderated out or severely edited, but why do you people think JT wrote it in the style he did? How many anti-Obama comments would he have gotten if the headline read: “Obama Collects Money from Rich People who Would Pay More Taxes Under His Economic Plan”? Aside from being too wordy, you can’t encourage a political “horserace” with honest reporting. The so-called “liberal media” are doing exactly what their corporate owners want them to by offering skewed reports that clearly are designed to ellicit some of the anti-Obama posts on this blog. Don’t forget this is the same “liberal” media that helped the current Republican president lie us into Iraq. Maybe we should take these articles with a grain of salt. Is the public that dumb? That easily led — again?? Well, apparently so.

Posted by: ndo | September 17, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

If Obama really cared about the suffering of Americans, why didn’t he scale back the extravaganza called the DNC convention, rather than paying for high-priced ornamental columns to match his overflated ego?
Hollywood has always been predominantly Democrat – and they can afford to be. They can sit and preach about their high morals while raking in giant salaries, even when it’s people with questionable moral compasses and frankly psychological problems. It’s interesting that many of the people being so outspoken about how great Obama is – or how bad John McCain and particularly Sarah Palin are – are the “stars” who haven’t accomplished anything noteworthy in years, if ever. Think about it:
-Matt Damon – what’s he done lately?
-Meg Ryan – a promising career that just died and then she pretty much capped it cheating on Dennis Quaid and breaking his heart.
-Lindsay Lohan – I feel sorry for her because she seems truly troubled, but anyone who is going to listen to her for political advice has some problems.
-Barbra Streisand – Sadly, she was a true talent, but I’ve never agreed with her politics and never will. She’s known as one of the most liberal (far, far, far, far left) celebrities around.
-Jada Pinkett – Her biggest accomplishment is being Will Smith’s wife, and she said she’s voting for MICHELLE Obama (hope she’s not homeschooling their kids).
-Oprah Winfrey – Well, she’s a racist, pure and simple. Enough said.
-The View co-hosts – They certainly showed their true natures in the McCain “grilling.” I’ve never watched the View, but you can be certain I never will. Too bad, I liked Whoopi.
-Chevy Chase – Love his old movies, but is this just a chance to get a little limelight in a dead career. I was really disappointed at the nastiness of his comments.
-MSNBC – In our household, this is now known as the “Obama Network,” and we don’t watch it – not only because we don’t support Obama, but we’re not going to support “journalists” who really aren’t journalists at all.
For me, I’ve chosen to tick these things away for the “celebrities” who come out with their nasty, hateful comments and do the only thing I can to let them know how I feel – refuse to fund anything they appear in. Of course, that doesn’t appear to others who support Obama, just because they do support them. They have that right, and I don’t have a problem with that.

Posted by: traci | September 17, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Women4Palin,
I think some women hate Governor Palin because she has a Barbie Doll quality about her. That is not generally a reason to hate a person, but I think it gets combined with a feeling that it has all come too easy for her; a feeling that she hasn’t paid her dues.
Combining beauty and easy success gives Governor Palin an elitist aura which clashes with her “homier”-then-thou persona in a way that leaves a hypocritical taste in the mouth.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Hey Mack -
Where exactly is Obama’s “district” ?

Posted by: jb | September 17, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

So John McCain having a Hollywood fundraiser on Monday with Patricia Heaton and Robert Duvall that brings in 4.7 Million is NOT news-worthy but the fact that “elitist” Barack Obama has one that pulls in 9 million is subject to defamation and ridicule. I just don’t get you Republicans and you’re I can do it but no one else can attitude. But I suppose if I were stuck with EXACTLY the same kind of candidates that brought us the last 8 years, I’d chew on any little bit of meat I could find. And now with the cover-up with the Trooper scandal…well its brought to you by the same folks that brought us the AG scandal and the Iraq war. What do we expect?!!?!?

Posted by: Suz in KS | September 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

philosopherkingtomas -
I’ll go you one further. Not only was McCain not a hero. Just before being shot down he was dropping bombs on people who’s faces he could not even see. If he was a victim, he was a victim of his own government which sent him to do what he was doing.

Posted by: jb | September 17, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

Emilly -
Michelle Obama isn’t running for office.

Posted by: jb | September 17, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Why is the media not calling Obama out about his role in the Fannie Freddie catastrophe? Obama is the number two recipient of campaign contributions from Fannie and Freddie. Obama has never introduced any legislation that would have regulated Fannie and Freddie’s loan practices of making loans to high risk borrowers. Yet Obama is saying now as President he will take the action necessary to regulated Fannie and Freddie. Problem is Obama is not credible on this issue or any other issue for that manner. Obama’s top two economic advisers are former Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac CEO’s who may have pulled strings to give Obama a “heads up”on the recent government bail-out plan. Washington Prowler has the story: Obama’s economic advisers from day one and who have raised him a ton of money: are Franklin Raines and Jim Johnson. Both of them are up to their eyeballs in the mortgage debacle. Both Raines and Johnson have served as CEO of Fannie Mae, with Raines taking over from Johnson. How Obama can say with a straight face that Republicans are responsible for the mess, when it is his key advisers who ran the agencies that that are the primary people behind the mess is beyond belief. The people who are responsible for what may well be the single largest government bailout in history are Obama‘s top economic advisors.. And every single one of them made millions off the collapse that are lining Obama’s campaign coffers. If McCain had Raines and Johnson as his campaign advisers you can bet the farm that the media would be all over it. Why the silence? Beware the Obama/Media complex.

Posted by: sam | September 17, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Why does Obama continually use the phrase “Economic Justice.” I just looked into it and found a book online called “Economic Justice: The Market Socialist Vision” by James Yunker. Basically the book states that the concept of Economic Justice is a tool that can be used to slowly change a capitalist country into a socialist country. The author takes the view that, because socialism has become a dirty word in most prosperous capitalist countries, direct cries for socialism won’t work. You have to first posit it as a market based economic strategy so that people can see how they will profit from it (i.e.,when the government takes from others to give to them). Then, once people see how they profit from it, it will be easier to implement a more traditional socialist economy. This is what Obama was talking about when he said middle Americans don’t know what is best for them. I am sure Obama has studied the above book in detail, because most of his economic policies (the few we have seen) come straight out of this book. It’s an eye opener.

Posted by: Wisdom767 | September 17, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Obama is the least qualified candidate ever in history. He does not have any records to show off…

Posted by: Steve | September 17, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Obama said. “And this [campaign] should be hard, because what we’re asking of the American people is a fundamental shift away from an economic theory that has dominated over the last eight years, that says, ‘You give more to the most and hope that it trickles down for everybody else.’” “You” give more to the most. Who is you??? I always thought people earned their money directly from their business or employer. I didn’t know that we only get money because the government let’s us have it. I also didn’t know that the government can just decide that we shouldn’t get as much anymore and that some of our earnings have to go to somebody else. Somehow I don’t think this is what the founding father’s contemplated for the US. I thought it was all about liberty and freedom from the abuses of government.

Posted by: Vern | September 17, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Obama is for change? He voted ‘Present’ how many times? Give me a break! I can’t wait for the debates. (no teleprompters allowed) McCain 2008 ~ Clinton 2012

Posted by: Michelle | September 17, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

You people are stuck in a passing time. How sad! McCain voted the same as Bush. Therefore its safe to say that if McCain was president for the last 8 years we would be in the same condition.

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | September 17, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

I honestly feel sad for McCain. He is starting to look 82 instead of 72.. He knows he has no chance in hell of beating Barack!

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | September 17, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

I honestly feel sad for McCain. He is starting to look 82 instead of 72.. He knows he has no chance in hell of beating Barack!

Posted by: Bushwacker08 | September 17, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

obama is a fool if he thinks I will vote for him. I keep abreast of all that goes on in govt., he hasen’t got a snowballs chance to win- when you look at his record. I can’t even be shure he is even an american born citizen. I have more experience than he does.

Posted by: Jessie Hamby | September 17, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

The filthy rich Hollywood crowd that threw this fundraiser can’t be bothered to give a dime to help the thousands of Americans displaced by Hurricane Ike. Just shows where their priorities are.

Posted by: Asia2PA | September 17, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

A lot of things have been said about Barack Obama in the past, and I’m not sure I agree with all of them, but one thing is beyond question: the man is a socialist. There is no argument there. Everything in his life up to this point has involved the advancement of socialism. The problem is, the US cannot afford to have a socialist president at this time. Our country is 9 trillion dollars in debt and the last thing we can afford to do is elect a president that is promising trillions in new spending. We have to go in the opposite direction. We have to cut back on spending so we can start paying down the enormous debt. It is also unfair to saddle future generations with debt to pay for social welfare programs for people today. If we continue down the path to full socialism at this time by implementing Obama’s socialist healthcare system, we will destroy any chance the nation has to balance the budget and pay down the debt. If we enact the oppressive tax increases that Obama is proposing, we will bring the economy to a screeching halt and people’s retirement funds will plummet in value. We just can’t afford any more socialism in America at this time.

Posted by: Don't do it | September 17, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

traci’s commentary on celebs that endorse Obama is hilarious. What’s Matt Damon done? Tell us about those celebs that endorse McCain…Patricia Heaton…Ray Romano’s tv wife. Chuck Norris? Wow. Jon Voigt…he did donate sperm to make Angelina Jolie, which men everywhere appreciate. The truth is, everybody is behind a candidate. Some are smarter than others and support the guy who isn’t going to keep our country on a path down the toilet.
Obama! O-8! Oh yeah!

Posted by: Karl | September 17, 2008, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

The bottom line is that Obama’s ideas are no different than any other Demo. He believes in “Income redistribution” and taking money away from hard working Americas that earned it honestly (and worked hard to get an education) and giving it to people that don’t. I would love to see every kid, handicapped, and elderly person in this country have insurance. But, others need to get a job and pay for it like I do. I have a simple proposal, if Obama wants to insure all Americans, let’s eliminate Welfare and food stamps and fund it that way. What do you think? Additionally, he has less than 140 days of experience in the Senate. He never did have a real job before that and does not understand the military

Posted by: Ed | September 17, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

I remembered Babs Streisand courageously honoring her promise to leave the U.S. if George Bush was elected in 2000.
Oh wait, she didn’t move after all. She must have been on the same private jet that never left the runway as Martin Sheen and Alec Baldwin

Posted by: beth | September 17, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Todd–the reason I hate Palin is NOT her barbie doll persona. That’s a swallow reason for hating or liking her. The reason I hate Sarah Palin is that she is totally unqualified to lead this country and I fear, yes really fear, for my children and grandchildren. My granddaughters will no longer have choice if Mccain/Palin wins. Secondly, Mccain’s history is based on war…which American city do you propose should be taken out first by our enemies, once Mccain/Palin start their nuclear war? Palin has NO Foreign policy experience and we are supposed to trust her with our children? Men need to stop thinking with their “little heads” and start thinking about their wives, mothers, daughters, children. Yes, I hate Palin for the future she will deliver.
-concerned Mom in Michigan

Posted by: Intelligent voter | September 17, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

concerned Mom in Michigan,
I apologize. Your reasons were much more thought out than mine were. Although I think my reasons were also valid, I can see how your reasons reflect an emphasis on things that are much more important.
Todd

Posted by: Todd Gatts | September 17, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Hollywood elites live in a pretend world with more money than they know what to do with. They are surrounded by sycophants who tell them they can do no wrong, and they believe their own press that they are prettier, smarter and more deserving than the average American. They can afford to pay more taxes (and afford more accountants to shelter their income) so what does it matter if Obama raises taxes? What does the “average American” know anyway? Can’t they see he really cares? Why can’t these ignorant, working-class dummies understand that Obama, with his smooth talk and big smile, is the perfect man to save this country from all the evils of conservatives and Republicans?
Reality check. They love Obama because he’s just like them … all surface, no substance. They hate McCain because he represents gritty reality, true sacrifice, and a willingness to say what he believes rather than what others want to hear. They hate Palin because she’s a “working-class mom” who has actually accomplished more in a short time in Alaska governance than Obama has accomplished in his entire career.
The McCain/Palin ticket points out the meaninglessness of their own contributions, but Obama justifies their existence. He makes them feel good about themselves, so they have to vote for him.
As for me, I won’t vote for a socialist no matter what the color of his/her skin. I won’t vote for someone with no relevant experience no matter how eloquent his/her speeches. I won’t vote for someone who unashamedly uses the race and class envy cards, while at the same time claiming his opponents are divisive. I won’t vote for someone who wants to tax this country to death.

Posted by: Colorado Conservative | September 17, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

I remembered Babs Streisand courageously honoring her promise to leave the U.S. if George Bush was elected in 2000.
Oh wait, she didn’t move after all. She must have been on the same private jet that never left the runway as Martin Sheen and Alec Baldwin
Great Post by Beth!
If I may add..Alec Baldwin did in fact get on a plane after the election..but it wasn’t to leave the country. Baldwin accepted the role of a Great American Hero by the name of General Jimmy Doolittle. The movie’s name was “Pear Harbor” (2001). General Jimmy Doolittle (Then, Lt. Colonel Doolittle) was awarded the Congressonal Medal of Honor for the daring bombing raid over Tokyo in 1942.
Doolittle a Great American and great Republican was promoted to full general and his 4th Star pinned in a White House ceremony by President Ronald Reagan and Senator Barry Goldwater later in the General’s life.
There you have it. When it comes to “principals” the Hollywod big mouths are all Phonies where the Big Bucks will take precedence over principle any day of the week. Sounds to me like Obama fits in very well with these types.

Posted by: Al MacLeod | September 17, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

After reading all of these comments, I just have to wonder what the hell people are thinking. Politics aside, the REAL problem with this country is that there will always be those who can’t see past the color of a person’s skin, and this is still a country FULL of racists. Doesn’t anyone remember Dr. Martin Luther King’s words about the “…content of their character”? John McCain voted against the Martin Luther King Holiday, and that pretty much sums up his feelings on race (oh sure, I know he has an adopted daughter from Bangladesh…whatever). On another note, sure, he went through hell as a prisoner of war, but that doesn’t qualify him, or anyone else, to run this country. He is a 72-year-old man who has had 3 bouts with malignant skin cancer, and even though the torture in Vietnam didn’t take him down, skin cancer very well could. It scares me to think that if something should happen to him, IF he gets elected, then Palin would be in charge of running this country.

Posted by: Patty | September 17, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Patty – Dr. Martin Luther King’s words about the “…content of their character” sums up why I won’t vote for Obama. He has demonstrated no real achivements. He is a socialist. He has associated with leftist radicals throughout his career. He doesn’t have enough of an actual record to know where he stands on issues (other than, of course, his two autobiographies). The color of his skin has nothing to do with it. It’s his big-government, high-tax, weak-defense approach that will be very damaging to this country … and that’s why I won’t vote for him.
It’s obvious you hate McCain/Palin. But, pray tell, what exactly do you like about Obama? Is it his “community activism”? Is it his Harvard law degree (which can be debated as positive or negative)? Exactly how is he more qualified than McCain or Palin? Seriously, details please.

Posted by: Colorado Conservative | September 17, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac gave Obama huge contributions; and in turn, Obama hired the former head of Fannie Mae, Jim Johnson, to lead his VP search team; even after Mr.Johnson ran Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac in the ground. It is fact that only one other democratic senator received more money from Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac….so please people, don’t delude yourself that Obama has never accepted money from lobbyist. Oh, and Obama gave his wife’s employer a million dollar pork package after she was promoted….so let there be no mistake…he is just like all the other politician…EXCEPT, he has no experience.

Posted by: mcpalin101 | September 17, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Why does the Obama compaign not seized on the fact that his campaign has not taken a single dime from taxpayer, while half of McCain money are subsidize by the tax payer close to $100 million of tax payers money is wasted on Lies, Deception and Selfish ambition. McCain is not for Country First, he is for McCain first. Who is really for changes, not McCain. In regard to ear mark that funds go to schools, hospitals and special social projects. What is wrong with that. Who is on the look out for the tax payer, not McCain, its Obama. The Republican use everything they have against Obama, yet I have no idea why Obama does not use this against the Rebublican. Maybe its a trump card to be used later, but I highly suggest Obama make this known to people as many do not know this.

Posted by: wade | September 17, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

28,500 per ticket? I am asuming these are not the average americans he claims to care so much about. Who is out of touch with reality? Mr Obama you are a crook a fake and a coward who hides behind the race card and god willing will never be elected President of this great country. Go be a trustee in your Racist Pastor’s church. He is your sounding board for ideas according to your own book. And who the hell cares what a celebraty thinks anyway. Talk about out of touch with reality.

Posted by: batesba | September 17, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Oh well, Obama’s party is just getting ready to start. In case you have heard, McLiar’s convention poll bounce has disappeared even with Palin.

Posted by: suv2001 | September 17, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Bad timing . . . very very bad Mr. Oh-I’m-so-close-to-the-common-man! Hello!? He’s so common that he’s hanging with the Hollywood liberals! He should have cancelled or sent a proxy…remember how the Republicans curtailed their convention because of the hurricane?! Guess what Senator Obama . . . there’s a hurricane on Wall Street and you should be hanging out on main street! Shame on you! I’m embarrassed to admit I almost voted for you! Thankfully you’ve helped me see what a stupid decision that would have been.

Posted by: LFforMcCain | September 17, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

How is it that is O’Babble is sooo smart, so many stupid people are backing him ? Do smart people pay $30,000 to hear Barbara Streisand “sing” ?

Posted by: Ron | September 17, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Seems he has learned since his spring fundraiser in San Francisco not to say people don’t support him cause they are bitter and cling to religion, guns and bigotry. But we already know he thinks that, so bye-bye Barack.

Posted by: Typical White Person | September 17, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Main St. in trouble, Joe Hollywood is filling his pockets. What a surprise.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 17, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

Just shut up about Obama using his own money and how noble it is. Checking that box in your tax return means that more people will be able to have a chance to run for office. It makes elections more fair. What he has done has insured that anyone who runs for office in the future will at minimum have to have about 500 million dollars before they even consider it, and how does anyone raise that kind of money without some kind of strings attached. It leads to the kind of corruption that we are all supposedly sick of.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 17, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

Just another case of Nobama selling out to the Hollywack fringe.

Posted by: roger king | September 18, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

As a loyal Clinton supporter I wish Hillary would have been our choice but this is going to set up what is going to be an interesting match in 2012 Clinton/Palin, and as a loyal democrat im getting the feeling that my party is leaving us conservative dems behind we would be talking about a super majority right now, but no we have to make history now, Im voting for Obama but damn if we arent screwing it up. 2010 midterms will teach us dems a lesson in coalition building because the 500 million dollar man has drained our coffers and the DNC will be broke and when we finally get to a recession which is two quarters of negative growth we wont have any money for our candidates of the future. now liberals talk about how the GOP leaves on our own, funny we are not investing in the future of the party and thinking about the now, so democrats of the future your on own in raising money and networking because the DNC will be broke mid 2009 so much for plan 50 state plan Gov Dean envisioned.

Posted by: Quintell | September 18, 2008, 5:31 am 5:31 am

“The reason I’m calm, is I have confidence in the American people.” said Obama at the Hollywood fundraiser. Which American people? The socialists in tinseltown?
Calm? Bet Obama was calm..he smokes like a chimney despite his protestations to the contrary. So much for a “healthy” president if he were elected. I wonder who his Surgeon General would be if elected President..Jocelyn Elders again with “safe cigarettes” as in “safe bullets”? Maybe the cigarettes calmed him..hope it was only cigarettes.
Old habits are hard to get rid of and since Obama admitted in the past that he has not been totally honest with the American People about his cigarette habit, why should anyone believe anything he says? So much for credibility as far as Mr. Obama is concerned..at least from my perspective.

Posted by: Al MacLeod | September 18, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Please don’t compare Obama to Dr. King. The differences are night and day. Dr. King spoke of hope. He was a man of morals and character. He loved our country. He did not belong to a hate church and he actually used action and not the words and the help of the media to try to make people believe in him. After all the coverage I have seen, I have come to realize that Obama does NOT possess the skills to lead this country. The media may support him because they want to appear to non-racist. I am a white woman who will be voting for McCain and if McCain were black and Obama white I would still be voting for McCain. This is a job interview not a civil movement and the most qualified will lead. I am a life long democrat but this year I will be changing my party. I DO NOT believe in the race card as the media does. And I do not believe in the empty words which flow so easily from the mouth of Obama. McCain/Palin 2008

Posted by: badger229 | September 28, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.