By Natalie Gewargis

Sep 3, 2008 1:38pm

Obama Hammers McCain Campaign Manager for Saying ‘This Election Is Not About Issues’

NEW PHILADELPHIA, Ohio — Responding to comments made Tuesday to the Washington Post by McCain campaign manager Rick Davis that "this election is not about issues, this election is about a composite view of what people take away from these candidates," Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., accused his rival, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., of having no issues to run on.

"John McCain’s campaign manager said that this election is not going to be about the issues, it’s going to be about personalities," Obama said at a town hall meeting aimed at women and economic issues. "That’s a quote. He said it’s not going to be about -– it’s not going to be about the issues, it’s going to be about personalities, which probably explains why, last night, when they were speaking, all these speakers came up –- you did not hear a single word about the economy.

"Think about it," Obama continued, standing in the blazing sun at Kent State University’s Tuscarawas campus. "Not once did people mention the hardships that folks are going though, not once did they mention what are we going to do about keeping jobs here in Ohio, not once did they mention what are we doing about all these retirees that are losing their pensions, not once did they mention how are we going to make sure Social Security is there for the next generation, not once did they mention how are we going to make college more affordable so that young people aren’t taking out $40,000 or $50,000 in debt, not once did they mention how are we going to make sure people can stay in their homes?"

Obama added, "I guess I don’t blame them. Because, if you don’t have any issues to run on, I guess you want it all to be on personality. And if you’ve got George Bush’s track record and John McCain voting 90 percent of the time in agreement with George Bush, then you probably don’t want to talk about the issues, either.

"I don’t know what John McCain’s thinking," Obama concluded, "but I’m going to be talking a whole lot about issues. … John McCain’s campaign manager is wrong, it’s not about personality, it’s about the issues that you are facing in your day-to-day lives."

Obama also said that, Tuesday, ex-senior McCain adviser, former Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, had  "repeated" his use of the word "whining" when describing Americans going through tough economic times.

Gramm told a Financial Services Roundtable event in Minneapolis, Tuesday that "if you’re sitting here today, you’re not economically illiterate, and you’re not a whiner, so I’m not worried about who you’re going to vote for." Gramm had been alluding to comments he made in July that the U.S. is in "a mental recession … We have sort of become a nation of whiners. You just hear this constant whining, complaining about a loss of competitiveness, America in decline."

"He said the same thing about whining," Obama said today. "’Stop whining.’"

At another point in his remarks, Obama, as has become a campaign tradition, misstated the name of the town he was visiting, calling New Philadelphia "New Pennsylvania."

– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

Obama, as has become a campaign tradition, misstated the name of the town he was visiting, calling New Philadelphia “New Pennsylvania”
Obama does not have the mental capacity to serve as President. Neither does “Oh that Joe” -gaffe and gaffer.

Posted by: geevill | September 3, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

That is a pretty dumb thing to say. I have to agree with Obama., You know Obama has been hitting harder since Sarah Palin hit the scene., Wonder if he is mad about not being the biggest star in the world anymore. LOL hopeFully Sarah Palin will do perfect tonight at the convention. This will be the single most important moment for her, Everyone will be watching.

Posted by: Peter | September 3, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Not about the issues? Excuse me??
I have been spending $60-$70 dollars to fill up my gas tank so I can take my children to school and go to work.
My health insurance premiums are eating up a whole lot of that paycheck.
My brother-in-law has been to Iraq three times and might have to go a fourth.
I don’t know what planet the Republicans have gone to, but here in the real world there are issues. I think it would benefit the United States of America to elect someone that realizes that.

Posted by: Ohenry | September 3, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Obama is an embarrassment – and IF he wins I’ll never claim him as being my President .. EVER!!

Posted by: Marcus | September 3, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Let’s see McCain campaign manager says issue don’t matter.
RW commentator wants to talk about gaffes

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

The only two people running who have legitimate experience in the area of foreign affairs is John McCain and Joe Biden. Both are capable of leading this country. Joe Biden should be at the top of the Democratic ticket. That has to be obvious to any thinking person. I got no gripe with a woman or black in the White House, but Sarah Palin is not qualified to run this country, and neither is Barack Obama. I’m choosing the lesser of two evils – McCain/Palin – and praying he doesn’t keel over dead in the next four years.

Posted by: Righteously Indignant | September 3, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

It it was, how in the heck, since I cannot use that word, His Nothingness Zero-bama got the nomination!????

Posted by: d0 | September 3, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

John McCain – great story, no solutions.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

“Mental capacity”!! You must be joking!
Let’s talk about John “I finished 896 out of 900 in my class” McCain.
Let’s talk about John “consistently mistaking country border, non-existent countries, doesn’t know the difference between Iraq/Iran, Sunni/Shia” McCain.
What short term memory you have.

Posted by: Gina S | September 3, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Unfortunately, Obama again took the bait.

Posted by: Julian | September 3, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

of course it isn’t about iossues …we can’t even get by the huge hole in the bottom of the republican boat that is called VP Palin.
John McCain should be nowhere near the white house…
his VP choice is just like every other decision he makes…all huff…no substance.

Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Of course it’s about issues. Wealthy Republicans who want their control of your life, but want you to like them before they take over. It’s just WHOSE issues you missed.
I can’t wait to see the Nielsens. I live with Republicans. None stayed up past Fred’s boring intro, and slept through the Recreation Room at the Retirement Center parts.

Posted by: kravitz | September 3, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

I think the Republicans are trying to put on a brave face. Because in midst
of all the rhetoric about being stoked on the Palin VP pick, they are still losing their homes, jobs, and still suffering under a Rupublican President.

Posted by: Lois, California | September 3, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

It’s perfectly understandable to get the name of a town wrong after you’ve visited thousands of them on the campaign trail with little sleep. And if you think a misstatement like that clarifies what a candidate is like, then you are dead wrong, and probablty wouldn’t be capable of doing any of the things a candidate needs to do to run a campaign.
If you ignore the bulk of the content of an article and stress one little sentence, then you are missing the point – the Republicans don’t want to talk about the issues and would rather make the race for president about who’s the most popular. They feel they can win that contest because it’s easy to manipulate people to believe that your candidate is larger than life!

Posted by: Gerry - Denver | September 3, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

The Obama folks don’t want a woman on any ticket.
First, Hillary was “too” experienced and being a Washington “insider” disqualified her from bringing about the change that Washington needs.
OK. Now John McCain has selected someone that truly is a Washington outsider and has been in elected office more than Sen. Obama. Now all of a sudden, Sen. Obama wants someone that is truly experienced? If he really does, he’d step down and suggest Hillary be placed on the top of the ticket.

Posted by: jose | September 3, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

d0
Because we voted for him.

Posted by: jock59801 | September 3, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Of course, the Republicans don’t want this to be about the issues. They are campaigning on the tails of the most failed administration in American history. And over the last three years, John McCain has voted 90%, 95%, and 100% in favor of those failed ideas. Republicans are running from the issues as fast as they can.

Posted by: ElodieStClair | September 3, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

no the obama folks want a caniddate that isn’t against women
and Fox just put up a story an hour ago talking about “How long will the GOP have to keep bailin’ Palen?”
in 20 minutes it got pulled down
fair and balanced…ugh

Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Yep the McCain camp is only going to run on McCain being a POW.
The McCain camp says who cares about the issues.

Posted by: vickie | September 3, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

Geevill,
Barack Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. John McCain graduated fifth from the bottom of his class at West Point, a school he was admitted into only because his daddy pulled strings. I’m not sure I’d be mentioning mental capacity if I were a Republican. Obama, if elected, will be one of the greatest pure intellects to ever hold the office.

Posted by: Nocore | September 3, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

d0
Because we voted for him.
Posted by: jock59801 | Sep 3, 2008 2:04:22 PM
—-
Yup, blindly, recklessly, religiously, and Godly, plus the help of Affirmative Action, deception, and distortion.

Posted by: d0 | September 3, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

This should be a clue to Americans when they see the replublican party saying ISUUES doesn’t matter.
WHAT…WHAT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
MAKE SENSE ,IF YOU GO LOOK AT THE REPUBLICAN PLATFORM , GOOD LUCK FINDING ISSUES THAT CAN FIX THE PROBLEMS THAT AFFECT EVERYDAY AMERICANS .
HOWEVER IF YOU ARE A BILLIONARE COMPANY OR A MILLIONARE YOU NEED NOT TO WORRY …THE REPUBLICANS WILL LOOK OUT FOR YOU .
THATS WHY YOU HAVE REPUBLICANS SAYING ISSUES “DOESN’T” MATTER , THEIR PLATFORM IS EMPTY IN THIS DEPARTMENT , THEY JUST TAKE YOUR TAX DOLLARS AND WASTE IT IN GOING TO FIGHT UNNECESSARY WARS ,
NOTHING COMES BACK TO YOU IN FIXING HEALTHCARE AND HIGH COST OF DRUGS ,INFRASTRUTURE eg. building roads bridges which in turn create jobs; FIXING SCHOOLS ALSO THE ENVIRONMENT ETC.
THATS WHY THIS ELECTION IS DIFFERENT FROM YEARS PAST ,
BARACK HAVE A CHANCE TO EXPOSE THE ISSUES TO THE PEOPLE SO THEY ARE INFORM AND CAN MAKE THAT DECISION.

Posted by: riley | September 3, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Palen = affirmative action pick
Only in a Republican America is a man who is a Harvard Educated Constitutional Law Scholar, with 8yrs as State Senator and 4 yrs as US Senator who has run a brilliant and ultra successful progressive campaign not ready to lead but a ultra conservative woman with a BS in journalism and 19 mos as Governor ready on day one…”
Disgusting

Posted by: watching | September 3, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Wow, Obama is complaining about everything HE IS GUILTY OF.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Only guy really talking about the myriad of issues has been Ron Paul, although Obama has touched on a few things throughout the campaign. McCain stands for nothing more than spreading fear and going to war. All you have to do is listen to what has come out of his mouth.

Posted by: Ben Straub | September 3, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

McCain & Palen families
Obama & Biden families
(look at true biographies)
what role models for your children do you want in the white house

Posted by: for my kids | September 3, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

All Obama focussed on is “I guess some people won’t vote for me because I am not of a certain pedigree, oh, ok, I get it.” That was in his latest speech in accepting the Nomination. Flip, Flip, Flip all you want. We know your cheap game BO.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

McCain lacks judgement!

Posted by: Howard Gallas | September 3, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Palin will be forced to resign and the media and dems will take the fall. We’ll be accused of being sexist and down right mean to her. It doesn’t matter there are numerous other rep women who would have been a better choice.McCain’s first executive decision proved fatal to his campaign.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 3, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

….and obama proceeded to talk in the abstract realm for the rest of the speech, as he always does….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Marcus
“Obama is an embarrassment – and IF he wins I’ll never claim him as being my President .. EVER!!“
—————————————–
Then get ready because change is coming. We need a president with common sense. Not a cold war mentality.

Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Judgement by Character as to who will be the Best canidate to solve the issues, is what this campagin is about! Obama has voted “present”. He is NO problem solver. No past record of reform or change. Just talk, no walk. Biden bawls, his past calls on decisions of foreign affairs, have been proven wrong.
McCain/Palin have proven they resolve, and reform problems, and have the experience and solutions to tackle, the issues at hand.
Obama/Biden have Questionable Characther!! McCain/Palin have crystal clear Patroitic Characther For Putting Country First!!! This ex Dem voter is voteing Republican. Too bad the DNC didn’t reconigize Hillary’s, experiance,work ethics, Characther, and attitude. She was the #1 choice of everyone Dems & Repubs alike that I knew. But Now No One I know will vote Dem. It’s McCain/Palin’08′ !!!!

Posted by: Voteing McCain/Palin'08' | September 3, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

if you truly want the best President for our children, our troops and America, then the only choice is to vote for Senator Clinton on November 4th

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

you would think common sense would have told obama to protect his impressionable children from the hateful speeches of his pastor…..

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm

This is a classic example of the ages old situation described as “being caught between a rock and a hard place”. There is simply no way to explain away the reckless and irresponsible decision by McSame to have Mrs. Palin as his running mate. On the one hand, if McSame thoroughly investigated Mrs. Palin’s background, then how can one explain the decision to place a 17-yr old pregnant teenager in the glare of a Presidential campaign. On the other hand, if McSame did not thoroughly investigate Palin before choosing her as his running mate, then how can that snap judgment be characterized as wise and prudent. No, the G.O.P. spin machine will never dig McSame out of this one. He’s screwed either way he turns for no matter what he did, he proved himself to be a very poor and dangerous candidate for President of the United States. Obama/Biden 08!!!

Posted by: caliguy55 | September 3, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

Obama, as editor of the Harvard law review, has not authored ONE law manuscript, unheard of as an editor, and much more so as a law professor. A sign of sheer lack of motivation and intelligence. Lazy, really.
Bush also graduated from Yale. So, are you touting an Ivy League education as evidence of leading?
Obama’s “years” as US senator are useless, as he starting running for Prez from the start. Palin has been governor longer than Obama has served in the US Senate before starting his campaign.
Obama has NO executive expereince, except for chair of the Anneberg Challenge, yet he NEVER talks about that.
When asked about his executive experience, Obama bragged about his “experience” running his campaign.
So….it is no longer executive experience, or legislative expereince, but it is not CAMPAIGN EXPERIENCE that makes you a better president.
Obama will go down in history as the WORST Presidential candidate…EVER.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 3, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm

I do not want to have an Alaska separatist as my VP. Is this the best McCain can come up with?

Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

in case anyone is stupid, the duties of a Governor are more closely aligned with those of a President than those of a senator….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

a hypocrite with horrendous judgment and who inspires his supporters to be arrogant, ignorant, naive, racist and sexist……such is the obama campaign….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Truth Hurts

Posted by: Tim | September 3, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Rick Davis is right, this campaign should not be about issues. We need to once again argue the Vietnam War like we have done every election since 1964. We need to continue living in the past and ignoring the changing world. Saddle up John and Annie Oakley, I mean Sara Palin, get your gun! It’s time to refight past battles!

Posted by: DMR | September 3, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Obama is simply brilliant.
See how he weaves Bush in there and points out that even Republicans won’t defend the Bush legacy.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Sen. Obama continues to belittle Gov. Sarah Palin’s accomplishments and experience. He stated: “Well, you know, my understanding is that, uh, Governor Palin’s town of Wasilly [sic] has, uh, 50 employees, uh, uh, we’ve got 2500, uh, in this campaign. I think their budget is maybe $12 million a year. Uh, uh, we have a budget of about three times that just for the month. Uh, so I think that, uh, our ability to manage large systems, uh, and to, uh, execute, uh, I think has been made clear over the last couple of years.”
That may have been her experience as MAYOR. But as GOVERNOR of Alaska–the last two years–she has some 25,000 employees and an annual budget of $10 Billion.

Posted by: James Danley | September 3, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

If you watch the Republican convention, the one thing you will NOT hear being talked about are the last 8 years.
As far as the Republicans are concerned, those 8 years never happened.
Well, after the lights are out in St. Paul and all the hoopla dies down, the Obama/ Biden campaign will remind Americans of those past 8 years over and over and over.
And they will remind Americans that John McCain voted 95% of the time with the Bush administration, and they will remind them over and over and over.

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Obama’s first image intro was OPRAH. Talk about avoiding issues and selling IMAGE. Obama presents himself with a BS image to distract from his lack of knowledge on policy as well as detailed plans. Now he has basically ripped off all the other candidates ideas, mostly Hillary’s, because NOTHING about him is original, it’s ALL IMAGE ’cause that’s all he has. Then turns around and accuses everyone else of everything HE IS GUILTY OF. BsO is a total cut and paste of everyone else who was far more qualified than he.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

my family comes before all else, and for them, I will support the only candidate capable of being the best President: Senator Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

“in case anyone is stupid, the duties of a Governor are more closely aligned with those of a President than those of a senator”
Then maybe Palin should be at the top of the ticket if that is so important.
(hattip Obama campaign)

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Decent Amarican
When will McCain and his campaign be bold enough to face tough questions about the worst vp pick in American history.
Did you see Tucker Bounds get smoked by Campbell Brown yesterday? That was pathetic.
How about McCain refusing to take questions on Larry King?
It all comes down to judgment. I think McCain has to start learning from Obama.

Posted by: Kenny | September 3, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

“my family comes before all else”
Good for you Chris.
Unfortunately your candidate John mcCain does not feel the same way.
Otherwise why would he hire a man who smeared his then 2 year old adopted daughter and claimed he cheated on Cindy.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

The “One” thinks this is not about his personality? The only reason he beat Hillary is people did not like her personality – Obama and Clinton were virtually the identical on the issues.
Obama is a pop political celebrity star….and fading fast.

Posted by: Sally J. | September 3, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

all this hate from the obama lemmings is so transparent, it does not disguise well the fact that they are feeling guilty about supporting a lesser candidate for the White House, instead of doing what is best for their families and for all of our families by supporting the BEST candidate, Senator Clinton

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Obama contradict his own ads-Flip Flopper. Where were the issues when he did the “borderline ridiculous”?

Posted by: Tim | September 3, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

irma,
If you go to Obama’s web site, you’ll see that he has, in fact, laid out his policies in detailed fashion, and as he campaigns, he continues to expand on them.

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

And chris I say your candidate because a write in for Hillary is a vote for McCain.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Ryan C
Obama`s campaign staff alone is bigger than the whole state of Alaska. I mean Palin`s staff.

Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

ryan…..not surprising that you are clueless as to who MY candidate is, given my multiple postings stating my support for her: Senator Clinton

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

A question for McCain supporters:
What, exactly, has John McCain done during his 26 years as a Senator?

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

BsO is a total cut and paste of everyone else. Oprah had to help sell him. Talk about Image Pusher.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

“Obama`s campaign staff alone is bigger than the whole state of Alaska. I mean Palin`s staff.”
But she was Commander in Chief of the Alaskan National Guard! There she was manning the air defense stations against the Russkies while breastfeeding her baby! Where was Obama? Registering people to vote? What a wuss!
Wheew sorry….took a sip of that rw koolaid

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Breaking News!
Now we know Palin`s pastor is worse than Rev Wright.
Rev Hagee and Parsly are close.
Rev Wright is Patriotic. We know he served in Vietnam like McCain.

Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

To LOU, What exactly did Obama did?

Posted by: Tim | September 3, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Oh right, let’s vote BsO because he so good at selling is FAKE SELF.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

So, Hagee and Parsley are close. You mean ONE is like an UNCLE TO THE OTHER?

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Tonight should be the highlight to watch Palin. She is a nice woman, although her past and experience is questionable. I am betting she will have to withdraw.
Bad judgment from McCain.

Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

“Obama’s first image intro was OPRAH.”
Obama’s first image intro was the 2004 DNC keynote address. But hey I’ve gotten used to the dishonesty.
Got to Obama’s website. His plans for the country have detailed papers attached to them that include financing, benefits etc.
In contrast McCain’s website is heavy on the rhetoric, light on the details.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Chris.: Well since we’re apparently led to believe that governing a state with more caribou than people is such a hallmark for being VP/PREZ than where does that leave McCain? I quess everyone else should quite and we’ll just proclaim Gov Palin Prez.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 3, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Rick Davis is absolutely correct, this campaign has never been about the issues. It’s been about Hope and Change vs. More of the Same. It’s always been about “making history”, being bold for love of country, rising above partisan politics and lots of other high ideals that only the enlightened few can truly appreciate. Correct me, please, if I’m wrong.

Posted by: Woody | September 3, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Obama talks about issues and is concerned for Americans and their suffering.
John McCain wants to talk about himself.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

The only thing Obama has proven is that if he is elected president, he’ll be “present”. McCain has proven he’ll Put Country First! What part don’t the Obamabots Understand?

Posted by: NoTrustObama | September 3, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Really Clintons supporters. I thought we were past this. No amount of write in’s or “I’m voting for McCain if she isn’t on the ticket” isn’t going to bring her back. Really, at some point you have to accept the loss. This is what happens when everyone get’s a trophy and nobody wins/loses growing up. You continue to whine thinking you will get your way. Grow up, this is the world we live in.

Posted by: brian | September 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Oh, that’s right….BsO’s first intro was a speech someone wrote for him. Yeah, I remember….But most people didn’t. So OPRAH came to the rescue.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

One thing for sure, the speech she gives tonight will not be her’s.
We will still be waiting to hear from her.

Posted by: Thinking | September 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

what part of putting palin on the ticket puts country first??

Posted by: farah | September 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

If I was a Republican I would be beating my head against the wall!!!
None of you Republican trolls here can deny that McDummy’s poor pick of Palin for VP has thrown your whole campaign off message and stopped your attack!!!
You dummies will spend every waking minute left in this campaign defending McCain’s poor choice of VP and his horrible JUDGMENT!!!
In fact that is the NEW theme of the Obama campaign – JUDGMENT!!
Thank you John McCain!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

ANY NEW PRESIDENT IS INEXPERIENCE..
That charge of someone NOT experience especially for that position is total crap , it boils down to’ what are the ISSUES and will that President get done in signing off on all of them.
look at the republican platform you can fit their issues on a coin ,
they have zero .they just take your TAX dollars and go start wars which as you can see help ruin our economy.
Barack wants to change course instead of starting unnecessary wars he wants to take that money to fix healthcare , build and fix roads and bridges, fix schools .. the environment, all does investment help create jobs.
Whats the use voting for a president who you perceive with this so call experience governing with FAIL POLICIES like a BUSH.
Because we still will be in the same boat different drivers same car.

Posted by: spg | September 3, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Brian, go make that speech to TED KENNEDY while you’re at it.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

“Barack Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law School. John McCain graduated fifth from the bottom of his class at West Point…”
McCain fought in the war, withstood years of torture, successfully brought the largest US Navy squadron from bottom to top rank, is a successful Senator, took on his own party over their mistakes, and is now the candidate with the best plan to return America to prosperity and security.
Obama ran for the Senate and began to run for President after using lawyers to get rid of his opponents in Illinois and hiding behind women’s skirts having never been the executive of any organization except his campaign.
This is about tough-minded fair leadership that earns the respect of those whom one must lead, not a GPA or being the editor of the high school news paper and being fawned over as man meat by past their prime doyennes on the tube.

Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

This is a break for Obama.
If the election is about personalities
John McCain, don’t question me because I was POW, will come up short. Anger and bad judgment are issues that will sink him.

Posted by: Mc Mary | September 3, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

McCain, can you tell me about your economic policy. “We’ll, while POW I wasn’t thinking of economics.
McCain, can you tell me about your healthcare plan. “We’ll while I was a POW in Vietnam we didn’t get healthcare.
McCain, can you tell me about the lack of taxes on the rich.
“We’ll, taxes were there when I was a POW in Nam.
McSame, we get it, you were a POW. You also graduated in the BOTTOM 5% of your class. You are as smart as BUSH. Being a POW does not make you qualified for president. I know plenty of brave soldiers, but I wouldn’t let them babysit my daughter if my life depended on it

Posted by: brian | September 3, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

obama couldn’t win his illinois legislative seat against the long-term incumbent on the issues or personality, so he used under-handed technicalities to get her name off of the ballot…….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

mccain uses his POW status like obama manipulates his false promise of “Change”….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

“BsO’s first intro was a speech someone wrote for him. Yeah, I remember….But most people didn’t.”
He went on from making that speech to trouncing Alan Keyes in the election that Nov.
IOW, you were being untruthful.
Oprah certainly was an asset to the campaign (they figure she was worth 1 million votes).
But I really don’t see a problem with that. Why would you?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

the difference of course being that mccain was actually a prisoner of war, whereas obama’s promises are largely abstract and excused by his spin when they don’t succeed….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

Just because TIME WARNER is BsO’s number one donor, plastering each and everyone of his borrowed arguments that have been used against the game he played and is now accusing the Republicans of, doesn’t mean that you’re convincing Republicans to focus on what BsO has to sell. They are “Ecstatic” about Palin. McCain just brought in the Far Right with this pick, we all know what that means. Oh yeah and add that to the NO Obama Dems. Spin, flip, spin, flip. Not working now.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

although, i guess technically obama might be telling the truth about bringing change to washington…..instead of playing washington politics, obama would bring chicago-style politics to the beltway, the kind where dead people vote and constituents are ignored because they live in your friend’s buildings….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

“obama couldn’t win his illinois legislative seat against the long-term incumbent on the issues or personality, so he used under-handed technicalities to get her name off of the ballot”
The whole story?
Alice Palmer tapped Obama to run for her seat while she made a play for higher office. When that fizzled out, she wanted her seat back. Obama said no.
To get on the ballot, you needed to gather signatures. Since Palmer was not organized for such an effort, her campaign did a shoddy job. Obama challenged signatures and they were discarded leaving Palmer with not enough sigs to get on the ballot.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What is a person with a 4 month old special needs child doing running for office anyway. I would feel the same way man/woman, so don’t claim sexism. She will realize she is in over her head in 1 month, then withdrawl.
T-Minus 30 days until Palin withdrawl.

Posted by: brian | September 3, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

and let’s not forget the commitment to one’s church, which was joined and abandoned purely for obama’s political aspirations….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Hilarious that Davis said this campaign is not about issues. Really, seriously, McCain’s CAMPAIGN MANAGER says it’s not about issues? So what is it, a beauty contest, a popularity contest? A “vote for me because I was a POW” contest? Obama and Biden are out there talking about the issues, because they are INTELLIGENT, and because that’s what voters should want to hear about, that’s what elections should be about. The bankrupt viewpoint Davis expressed is really inexcusable – like McCain picking Palin as his runningmate – cynical manipulative politics – WHAT A JOKE.

Posted by: jon in maryland | September 3, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

John McCain has been in the Senate for 26 years.
What has he done?

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

ryan…..its always irrelevant to obama whether or not he is the best person for the job, so long as he gets the job….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Yet after all that Len,
McCain wants to primarily run on his life story not his plans for our future.
While Obama wants to primarily run on his plans for our future not his life story.
McCain is all about him.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

geevill,and all you other trivial pursuit fanatics-I just watched a speaker at the GOP convention exitedly yell out:”—the great Gov.PAWLENTY of alaska!”I think thats just a little more telling than calling new philadelpia new pensylvania.Maybe the citizens fellt even a little more important;I know Mr.Obama thougtht they were important as he evidently met them in person.

Posted by: maisy smith | September 3, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

let’s not also forget that obama gave more money to superdelegates than any other candidate….. and given his fundraising prowess, they didn’t have to be psychic to see how prosperous their futures would be….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

add to that the fact that michelle obama implied that Hillary was unfit to be President because Bill cheated….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

or the fact that obama played the race card when he strongly implied that Hillary disrespected MLK when in fact all she did was acknowledge LBJ’s contributions to the Civil Rights Movement….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Oh, wait a minute. Why aren’t we talking about what a JOKE the Gaffing Biden pick was? Because the media WON’t do it…….Wouldn’t make news about JOHN EDWARDS baby either. How long will it take for BsO to acknowledge that people have caught on to his DIRTY POLITICS AS USUAL?

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Keep talking Chris; I love everything you have to say. Obama, the fake hope.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Jake,
Did you see BEN STEIN on CNN just now?
He was laying into Palin like NO Democrat has done so far!!!
Look for this tie raid to be all over the internet this afternoon!!!
BEN STEIN, STAUNCH REPUBLICAN RIPS PALIN ON HER LACK OF EXPERIENCE AND SAYS “NO WAY IS SHE READY TO BE VP!!”
Thank god at least one top Republican is willing to tell the truth, instead of just spouting the Republican talking points about her, like they are reading from a script!!!!
Wooo Hooo!!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 3, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

ryan…..you’re right…its better to stand by and watch people make another horrible mistake which will negatively affect our families and mine, then to fully inform as many people as possible about the true nature of the candidates they are supporting to take on the awesome responsibilities of the White House….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

John McCain’s POW heroics do not qualify him to be President of the United States. And if they did, why not in 2000 when he was running against Bush in the primary? Why didn’t it count then but counts now?
All McCain talks about is his POW years, it’s all part of the personality politics the GOP is running. There is no issue or idea to run on, so their running on personalities.
Why do you think they chose Sarah Palin? It’s not because of her experience or her being ready on day one. If it was only about her being a woman, why not choose Hutchison or Snowe? It’s because they wanted the Palin story to sell. It’s glaringly obvious they want the POW Hero and the Every Mom, Rove himself said choosing Palin wasn’t about governing, it was about getting elected.

Posted by: Jonze | September 3, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

“let’s not also forget that obama gave more money to superdelegates than any other candidate….. and given his fundraising prowess, they didn’t have to be psychic to see how prosperous their futures would b”
Yes, why would party people want a dynamic candidate who excels at grassroots fundraising?
The mind boggles.
BTW, Hillary also passed some serious cash to the party members. That is what party leaders do.
Which begs the question why McCain has been so stingy with his fellow Republicans? Are there no decent Republicans he can contribute to?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

lets not forget the fact that obama and michelle subjected their impressionable children to the hateful rantings of the sermons inside of their church…..even if they did not occur everyday….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

So the majority of the posts from Obamas support is trolling attacks on other posters on this blog? ATTACK and INTIMIDATE free speech. Yeah I remember that BsO strategy from his Hope support.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“ryan…..you’re right…its better to stand by and watch people make another horrible mistake which will negatively affect our families and mine, then to fully inform as many people as possible about the true nature of the candidates they are supporting to take on the awesome responsibilities of the White House….”
Chris is a perfect world for you, you could vote for Hillary and there would be no consequences.
But if you really love and support Hillary you will realize the reality of the situation is Obama vs McCain and Obama is more preferable than McCain.
That is if you support Hillary and what she has been trying to accomplish all these years.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Hardvard, graduated magna cum laude; President of the Harvard Law Review
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator: sponsored more than 800 bills
4 years Senator for Illinos, a state with 12.8 million people
Palin:
Bachelor’s in journalism from University of Idaho
4 years Wasilla City Council (8000 people)
6 years Wasilla mayor (8000 people)
1 year “Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission”
20 months governor of a state with 660,000 people
Do they really think we’re THAT stupid?

Posted by: watching | September 3, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

ryan….once again, i must spell it out for you…..superdelegates essentially decided who the nominee would be……the candidates who were asking for their votes gave them money……obama gave the superdelegates way more money then Clinton…..obama got more superdelegate votes then Clinton…..do you see a pattern? or must i further paint the picture before you can fully understand the implications of bribery?

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Why should we want a candidate that was sold to the public by Oprah and CNN and MSNBC? They are the same ones that sold Bush to the public as well.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

i swear to god, i have only myself to blame for trying to inform or argue with an obama lemming (aka brick wall)….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Interesting…just looked at open secrets and its seems John McCain has had to return over $7,500,000 in contributions.
In contrast Obama has only had to return $1.5M.
Why is McCain so full of dirty money?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

ryan…..thus far, obama’s actions and conduct, during this campaign cycle and from his past, have provided plenty of evidence that the change he promises you will never be realized, because he places more importance on getting a job and keeping it then he does of doing the job as best he can…..if I believed he would actually deliver on even a portion of his promises, then he would have my vote….but his conduct, his behavior, his poor judgment, everything up to this point tells me that he cannot be trusted…..

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

and the hateful, disrespectful and shameful conduct and behavior of many of his supporters only further supports that notion that his candidacy is not right for America…..

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Bottom line…the far right is totally excited about the pick. Dems who were disenfranchised aren’t voting for BsO. So BsO has to go full force. He’ll have his media to back him and all the people will have to be bombarded with how the media REALLY REALLY wants him, while Biden gets away with daily idiotic lines 24/7. Then we expect the old guy Biden to represent us in foreign policy with his experience and MOUTH. OMG!

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

As a republician i am shocked at the level at which we stoop to win an election. we have lowered our standard, moral vaules the entire platform for power i am disgusted ..I power that great that our values no longer have meaning poor party…… POWER with poly-tick-ions as our values deminish the counrty go too WAKE UP do not let these Trick’sters get us we are much bigger that the republician party tood for morals dignity dreams aspiration not what we have become POWER Crazy

Posted by: pooh | September 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

having obama as President would be replacing one arrogant and ignorant and charming (to his supporters) leader (dubya) with another (obama)……obama’s promise of “Change” would only apply to his party affiliation, a little else….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

and the hateful, disrespectful and shameful conduct and behavior of many of his supporters only further supports that notion that his candidacy is not right for America…..
That’s right!! McCain is just another 4 more years of Bush. Thank God you saw the light.

Posted by: Chuck | September 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

correction….AND little else…

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

“ryan….once again, i must spell it out for you…..superdelegates essentially decided who the nominee would be……the candidates who were asking for their votes gave them money……obama gave the superdelegates way more money then Clinton…..obama got more superdelegate votes then Clinton…..do you see a pattern? or must i further paint the picture before you can fully understand the implications of bribery?”
Chris,
Obama did not overtake Hillary in Superdelegates votes until he was assured of winning the pledged delegate votes.
Your historic revisionism is quite amusing.
So candidates giving other candidates money equals a bribe, is that what you are saying? You do realize Hillary gave nearly $600K to party members over the last elections don’t you? You do realize that party leaders and stars are assets that help raise money for other candidates no matter the party right?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Oh now we’re getting the old argument about how BsO is more qualified to lead the people because he is an ivy leaguer. Yeah, well HIllary was the smartest of the bunch going by TEST SCORES.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

The Americda people do not want another term of George Bush ,that brought loss of millions of jobs, Irag war, and failed economy policy to America people, especially to the single mothers..who are finding it difficult to fend for their chilldren and at the same time the health care price is going up the roof,
Students are finding it difficults to pay their tuition as the lending markets are making it hard for the students to take loans..whereas the in the Repupican party ,being the party for the rich does not care about the common people and i sincerely asked the American people not to vote for the Republican party this time/.yes NOT this time..do not please enslave yourself with your own vote..Vote for the right part..the Inclusive party ..the DEMS PARTY
God bless you you vote for Democrats.
Yui

Posted by: Y | September 3, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

chris,
your “argument” consists of of not much more than attacks on Obama which are never backed by any facts.
Another claim is that Obama doesn’t have the “experience” to be president.
My question to you is:
What, exactly, has John McCain done in his 26 years in the Senate to prove that he has the “experience” to be President?

Posted by: Lou | September 3, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Chris, I am a Hillary supporter too just like you.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

ryan….the proof is in the results….Hillary won many districts whose superdelegates instead voted for obama…..obama has been giving superdelegates hundreds of thousands of dollars since 2005……i will give it to obama, he is very good at planning his political career, from joining a church to give himself credibility in illinois to visiting europe for the first time this year, despite his position on a foreign affairs cmttee in the senate…..his poor judgment in matters where he has actually taken a stand, and his lack of judgment where he hasn’t, only further supports the reality that he is not ready, he is unprepared, he lacks the character and judgment for the job, he lacks the fortitude for the rigors of the position, he is not trustworthy, he cares more about his career then his constituents, and he is able to persuade and charm many to him, creating such a fervor among his supporters that they become very hateful when he is either legitimitely questioned or opposed by a superior candidate….his following is looking more and more like a cult every day, and you have to admit that is probably not a good thing….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Doesn’t the mafia do what Obama Dems do? Slap you around, intimidate you then say “Pay up, we’re offering you protection!”

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

“But, shhhhh! We’re not supposed to talk about it..”
Urrp. No. Do talk about it. Get it all out front. Just be sure it is factual and related to the candidate not the family. Then be ready for the counter where the same or similar fault is found in your candidate.
Hey Ryan, yes, make it about the issues. If we don’t do that we are all buggin’.
But first the candidates will have to talk about them. So far we are stuck in the middle of a Spy vs Spy Bitter Butter campaign. Obama went on for a long time telling us he was going to tell us but never told us. McCain and Palin are just now stepping up to the podium this week. Then will come the debates.
Face it: here we’re all pumping air into a kids lawn bounce instead of mowing the lawn to find the bare spots. We’ve got about two months to finish this thing up.
Then we can all go back to whining about the incumbent.

Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

lou…..i am for Hillary Clinton, not mccain….Clinton has experience and instantaneous international credibility with her travels as First Lady, the organization she helped to create to empower women around the world in their local political spheres (Vital Voices), her prominent support in getting health insurance for over 6.6 million children and over 600,000 adults (SCHIP), her support for rural health care in Arkansas, her willingness to stand up to the chinese govt. when she overrided their objections to her speech on women’s rights (UN Beijing Conference)….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

additionally, obama largely borrowed Clinton’s plan for Gulf Coast Recovery, her economic plans, she was the first candidate out with a homeowners protection plan, a Green Fund to help our economy, especially the auto industry, move towards a more environmentally sound, and economically-long-range interest policy….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

what’s embarassing is that so many people have been duped into giving us two of the worst choices for President that we have had in a long time, thus acting against the best interests of our children, our troops and our country at a time when our country needs the best President it can get……and the only candidate who ran this year that fits that criteria is Senator Clinton…..

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

If you like how the country has been run the last 8 years and feel you are better off then vote for McCain. If not then vote for Obama. How hard is that. It’s not rocket science.

Posted by: zz | September 3, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

those of us who want the best President for our families are not beholden to our respective political parties simply because of tradition or that’s who we’re registered with…..republicans have for years been guilty of voting for their party, even when it was not the best thing for America…..this year, the same can be said for both parties, because the best candidate for America, Senator Clinton, is not a nominee……

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

you won’t hear many people accusing the mccain and obama supporters of being rocket scientists….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

If Obama is really against money influence in Washington, why doesn’t he release a list of all the Dem SuperDs who are benefitting from his Hopefund PAC? Since PACs and lobbyists are so evil – as he repeatedly told us throughout the primary – let’s see a list of who he bought off in order to snag the nomination. Obama understands “pay to play” from way back; just ask Rezko.
When it comes to changing the way Washington works, I’ll take Maverick McCain and Baracuda Sarah over Empty Obama and Uncle Joe any day!

Posted by: marylou | September 3, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

“.the proof is in the results….Hillary won many districts whose superdelegates instead voted for obama…..obama has been giving superdelegates hundreds of thousands of dollars since 2005…”
Obama won the pledged delegates Chris.
Most superdelegates stated they would go with the winner of the pledged delegates regardless of their district or state votes. Some superdelegates stated they would vote as their state or district did.
None of this mattered as Obama was the pledged delegate winner and Hillary was not going to have the results based on voters overturned by party members. Obama was selected by acclamation at the convention. A move called for by Hillary herself.
Both gave very generously to the party thru their PACs and that has contributed to us (should I say us? Are you a Democrat or just a fake Hillary supporter?)having a stronger Democratic party.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

chris, people normally vote with party lines because they agree with their policies. I don’t want a conservative Supreme Court, I think gays should have rights just like everyone else, I believe in equal pay for women and I believe in stem cell research. My list goes on. Does that sound like republican policies. No of course not. I will vote democratic because of these issues.

Posted by: zz | September 3, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

“If Obama is really against money influence in Washington, why doesn’t he release a list of all the Dem SuperDs who are benefitting from his Hopefund PAC?”
Marylou,
that is all part FEC records and can easily be looked up on open secrets.
I love the outrage that springs from ignorance!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

len,
I hardly expect commentators on a blog to discuss issues. But I do expect it from the candidates.
John McCain’s campaign is the one who called this an image election where issues do not matter.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

One more sign that Obama has left reality. The attacks of the past few days have made it impossible to find coverage of the issues. The issues are national the economy, national security, foreign policy, the deficit, job creation, abortion, domestic oil production, and many more wide ranging plans that address Americas needs.
A sick child is not an issue, a 22 year old arrest is not an issue, and educated move to drop support of bad legislation and oppose it once more facts are known, is a good thing not a bad thing.
The media has unfairly attacked an All American Mom. They have torn through her family and friends with no regard to limits, and have lowered themselves to tabloid media instead with the printing of pure lies and trash talk.
Isn’t this the same media that calls Rush Limbaugh sexist? You boys are far worse when given a serious threat by a Proud American Woman. Get a life and find a new job as reporters report news not trash.
Andy Zeus Anderson

Posted by: Andy Zeus Anderson | September 3, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

LOL.
Calling media attacks unfair then mentioning Rush Limbaugh as a victim?
LOL.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

“At another point in his remarks, Obama, as has become a campaign tradition, misstated the name of the town he was visiting, calling New Philadelphia ‘New Pennsylvania’.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 3, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

The McCain campaign called it like it is. BsO was selected and pushed on IMAGE, not issues.

Posted by: irma | September 3, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

I am so sick of hearing Obama talk about the economy when by the time this election is over, he will have received close to a half a billion dollars in campaign funding from individuals. Somebody is making money somewhere. If anyone has a different set of totals for his campaign contributions from individuals, I would love to see them.

Posted by: Maria | September 3, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Then the Obama campaign can easily send the list of PAC benefactors to the media, can’t they? I believe they have their contact numbers.

Posted by: marylou | September 3, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Oops! We all know Obama is the DNC’s Sugar Daddy – I meant he needs to send a list of the beneficiaries to the media.

Posted by: marylou | September 3, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Funny how he brings up the whining thing again when on his video at the convention he said something like his grandparents worked hard and weren’t whiners. I take that to mean others were whiners.
And does he ever get the cities names right?

Posted by: Maria | September 3, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

Oh boy Peggy Noonan and Mike Murphy were caught on open mikes dissing Palin and calling her a gimmick pick when there were other more qualified candidates.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Wouldn’t it be wonderful if people voted for the person most likely to succeed, that smart guy who showed how capable he was by pulling together and directing a campaign so brilliant and to get people on both sides of the political aisle are remarking on how his savvy.
Instead we get a campaign where McCain defines himself in terms of the leader Obama instead of detailing his plans.
McCain talks to us about old movies, pop culture.
McCain seeks out an ‘exciting’ rifle packing, hunting and moose skinning former beauty queen who’s now a slick politician and WOW – she’s also buddies with the oil companies. She’s for earmarks until she get’s caught and now she’s against them. She’s for TEd STevens but now she’s against him.
and her personal life is being visited on us in high drama – I don’t wanna know anymore!

Posted by: Citizen Voter | September 3, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

Of course this election and any other election should be about the issues. McCain is counting on distracting people away from the issues because he doesn’t have any realistic answers. He doesn’t understand the economy, he wants us to stay in Iraq for at least ten more years, he would like abortion to be illegal, the list goes on.
Just compare the websites of McCain and Obama. McCain’s website has small changes to existing Bush plans as the answers needed. Obama’s website under ‘issues’ has specific workable plans for each topic such as Social Security, Defense, Veterans, 24 different topics. They are terrific ideas that will make great change for the good without raising taxes on anyone making under $250,000.
I know I’m not going to convince any of the hard-core Repubs here but if there are any independents out there compare the two websites to make a truly informed decision. Sound-bytes have proven to be a dangerous way to decide on a president.

Posted by: Lydia | September 3, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

One issue I never hear anyone saying anything about is Science vs. Religion. McCain is with the party who thinks cells in a dish are life so we cant test them even though we can save lives. Palin is with the party who thinks telling kids about condoms is a “sin”. This is the same “Mother” your all promoting? Who has a 16 year old daughter that was knocked up by her pedophile boyfriend? Open your eyes! Really, seriously no pun intended!

Posted by: Ben Hogan | September 3, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

I wonder how many jobless workers, homeless borrowers and legless veterans were comforted and took solice in the words they heard tonight.

Posted by: Tim | September 4, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

NOT ONE TIME did palin mention the issues. I’ve seen people having to work 2 or 3 jobs just to make it on day to day basis and I AM FURIOUS!!! Gas prices are high, jobs are being shut down, people are losing their home, and etc. NOBODY should have to suffer that much. This is not about obama, it’s about us. We are the ones who are suffering and I am tired of going through what we went through the past 8 years. I’m only 21 years old and I can’t even afford to go to college. How can people vote for someone who agrees with bush 90% of the time. The only reason McCain chose Palin was because he thought he could use her to win w omen’s votes and as a woman I believe the neither McCain nor Palin are ready to lead our country. In my opinion Barack Obama and Joe Biden will run this country the right way. We need excellent leaders for our country and that’s why I’m voting for obama and biden.

Posted by: Danyelle C. | September 4, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

HER BELITTLING OF BARACK BEING A COMMUNITIY ORGANIZER WAS DOWN RIGHT DISGRACEFUL AND SHAMEFULL ,
SHE PRETTY MUCH ATTACK EVERYONE WHO IS OR AT ONE POINT DID GET INVOLVE AS A VOLUNTEER AND HELP OUT THEIR FELLOW MAN , BE IT MEALS ON WHEELS FOR SENIORS AND THE DISABLE , AT RISK YOUTHS, THE FOOD BANK , FIGHTING FOR WORKERS RIGHT…ETC
SHAME ON HER , BUT THIS IS TYPICAL OF THIS REPUBLICAN PARTY.
THE REPUBLICANS HAVE NO ISSUES TO RUN ON , OF COURSE YOU ARE LEFT TO ATTACK THE OTHER GUY ,
HOWEVER SHE CONVEINTLY LEFT OUT THE MESS BUSH MADE OF THIS COUNTRY FOR THE PAST 8 YEARS ,YOU WOULD THINK BARACK WAS THE PRESIDENT.
SHE IS JUST ANOTHER MOUTH PIECE FOR THE BUSH CAMPAIGN CLAN AND THEY USE HER SO WELL IN DELIVERING THEIR LIES AND TALKING POINTS.
THE BUSHMOBLE= STOPING TO PICK UP PALIN AND MCCAIN.
ANOTHER 4 YEARS IN THIS FLAT TIRE VEHICLE

Posted by: memo | September 4, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

McCain = awesome! Obama = not so awesome…. Palin = amazing and who is the other guy… oh well Palin is still better

Posted by: eric | September 4, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

I was LMAO! Here you have Barack running a revolunary hi tech ground campaign for the ages.. that will be the carbon copy in the future.
Here you have Romney and Rudy Giulani 2 of the BIGGEST LOSERS you ever seen in the primaries now BASHING Barack last NIGHT.
For a GUY who they CLAIM dont know MUCH or have experience. HE SURE THOUGHT THEM A LESSON ON HOW TO RUN A CAMPAIGN THAT BLEW EVERYONE OUT THE WATER.
IF BARACK PLANS TO RUN THE COUNTRY THE WAY HE RAN HIS CAMPAIGN.. AMERICA IS IN VERY GOOD HANDS.

Posted by: pd | September 4, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

What’s Obama whining about now?

Posted by: Dori | September 7, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

The only party that have had women issues at heart have been the democrats , from childcare to the freedom of choice for women , president bush not so long ago veto a child healthcare bill ,
they have zero issues in their platform in respects to women , the ones they have is STONAGE ..and the women better watch out in respects to the courts .
Regardless who is the candidate of the Democrat party you go vote and protect yourselfs , that supreme court bench is old ; and WHO will take those vacant spots when the time comes nobody knows but with crazies like Palin be very AFRAID.

Posted by: me | September 9, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.