Obama Hits McCain’s New Ad Claiming Palin ‘Stopped the Bridge to Nowhere’
"They’re starting to run an ad now saying she (Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin) opposed the Bridge to Nowhere," Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said today in Flint, Mich.
Obama was referring to this new TV ad from the McCain campaign, titled "Mavericks," which states that Palin "stopped the Bridge to Nowhere."
"Well, now, let’s get the facts clear here," Obama said. "When she was mayor, she hired a Washington lobbyist to get earmarks — pork barrel spending –- all the things that John McCain says is bad, she lobbied to get! And got a whole lot of it. When it came to the Bridge to Nowhere, she was for it until everybody started raising a fuss about it, and she started running for governor, and then, suddenly, she was against it!
"You remember that?" Obama asked the Flinters. "’For it before you were against it’? I mean you can’t just make stuff up. You can’t just recreate yourself. You can’t just reinvent yourself. The American people aren’t stupid."
Palin’s position on the "Bridge to Nowhere" is far more complicated than McCain’s TV ad makes it seem.
Obama’s take on it isn’t quite accurate, but according to Politifact, it comes pretty close.
Palin originally was a supporter of the Bridge while she ran for governor in 2006.
“The money that’s been appropriated for the project, it should remain available for a link, an access process as we continue to evaluate the scope and just how best to just get this done,” Palin said then, according to a story in the Ketchikan Daily News. “This link is a commitment to help Ketchikan expand its access, to help this community prosper.
“I think we’re going to make a good team as we progress that bridge project,” she told the audience.
The political winds began to shift, however, and as Politifact notes after Palin was elected governor, Congress began to divert funding for the bridge to other projects, leaving Alaska $329 million short in funding. "Lois Epstein, director of the Alaska Transportation Priorities Project, which opposed funding for the Gravina bridge, said while it’s true that Palin formally put an end to the project, ‘It wasn’t really a bold move when she did it.’ … Keith Ashdown, a spokesman for Taxpayers for Common Sense, the government watchdog that first drew attention to the project, believes Palin has ‘hyperinflated her role’ in killing the project. She put the final stake in the project,’ Ashdown said. ‘But there was already tremendous momentum for the project to be scrapped. She gets credit for saying that they were not to go forward with the bridge, but it was at death’s door.’"
– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Republicans stating a lie and repeating it over and over untill it becomes truth……..
Whats new?
Posted by: Joe | September 8, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Love the ad!
It’s a great piece of political judo wherein you take the mantra, the message, the strength of your opponent and claim it as your own.
Barack Obama has been on the campaign trail now for two years calling himself the agent of change, saying that he’s the person who can really effect serious reform in Washington.
Now you’ve got John McCain and Sarah Palin saying that they are the candidates of change, pointing to their experience and their resume — their actual work in government — as evidence of their ability to effect the change that Barack Obama says he hopes to bring.
Obama spends tens of millions of dollars trying to say he can bring change, while McCain-Palin have actually brought change and will take on Washington and get things done for America!
These great to-the-point ads that leave Obama sputtering:
Obama= $1 billion in ear marks
McCain = ZERO in ear marks
Obama, the ride is over!
McCain-Palin ’08
Hillary ’12
Posted by: USVet | September 8, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
What is disappointing about his response was that Alaska did get the money and they kept anyway
Posted by: Thinking | September 8, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Let’s the debunking begin. There is also the huge financial problem that Wasilla is having with the hockey rink she bought as a mayor.
In any case, what worries me the most is that McCain already confessed that he doesn’t understand the economy. Now it seems that his running mate–the QUEEN OF SARCASM–doesn’t have much understanding either.
Posted by: Lance D. | September 8, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
“For it before you were against it’? I mean you can’t just make stuff up. You can’t just recreate yourself. You can’t just reinvent yourself. The American people aren’t stupid.”
It works for Barack, why shouldn’t it work for McCain?
The American people aren’t stupid or as easily fooled as Obama’s handlers led him to believe. They tried to run a campaign of images and symbols but the image turned monstrous and the symbols became meaningless. Now their opponents are running with an image that is attractive to precisely the group Obama has turned off and that image turned them on. The symbols are still meaningless.
The good news in all of this is that both sides are being pushed toward the center, toward the issues we know are important to us as Americans instead of just one party or one class.
In other words, the American system is working as designed and implemented. Let’s open a keg of nails and celebrate.
Posted by: len | September 8, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
“You remember that?” Obama asked the Flinters. “‘For it before you were against it’? I mean you can’t just make stuff up. You can’t just recreate yourself. You can’t just reinvent yourself. The American people aren’t stupid.”
______________________
hmmmm.
IS OBAMA TALKING ABOUT HIMSELF?????
MCcain and Palin:
COUNTRY BEFORE BROKEN DOWN PARTY!
Posted by: hmmmmmmmm | September 8, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
I think what we need is an Obama MCcian ticket! Just putting that out there.
Posted by: joe | September 8, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
“However, Sen. Biden and Sen. Obama voted for funding the Bridge, even when given a second chance by Sen. Tom Coburn, who proposed shifting earmark funds to Katrina relief.”
Posted by: Mack | September 8, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
“What is disappointing about his response was that Alaska did get the money and they kept anyway”
Posted by: Thinking | Sep 8, 2008 4:28:25 PM
__________________________
What is REFRESHING about this story is that at least the monies were used by the state….. no kickbacks to the Palins!
McCain and Palin
COUNTRY BEFORE BROKEN DOWN DNC!
Posted by: EYES WIDE OPEN | September 8, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
You missed the last point: She Took The Money!
Congress was strong enough to take the earmark off Ted Steven’s bridge, but not strong enough to pull the money.
Sarah Palin took the money!
Posted by: Guy | September 8, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
McCain needs to let the Media Get access to his VP candidate. Im sure once America gets to know her. We will see an even bigger bounce. McCain needs to stop, Thats lame to hide your VP candidate away from the Media. The Only Place you can find Info about Palin is on the Web, Here is some sites Ive been able to find.
Has anyone else read this story about a possible Affair Sarah Palin had? That is just one of the Scandals listed at this site.
This site has background info on sarah Palin Bio, Pics, Videos, Alot of Polls like how many people actually think that she is attractive?
Despite all of this, and her lack of experiance she would probably make a much better president then McCain., Because like Obama she hasnt been corrupted by washington yet. We should probably reverse the ticket Palin/McCain.
Posted by: Pezti | September 8, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
This just proves that there are more mindless followers than right thinking people. There is the truth supported by facts, then there is what you want to believe. It comes from a history of racism and bigotry. McCain an Palin shovels loads of bullshit on the masses who know in their heart of hearts that it’s all BS but because of personal prejudice, they support more of the same. We all know that Palin is a fraud put out there to give a nice face to Republican Propaganda, we know that the wealthy 2% of this country cannot afford to allow change to come to washington… what the republicans an people like Rove know, is that there are many Americans who are just plain stupid and/or racist and need something to make them feel justified in going against their good conscience and logic. It is appauling and downright disgraceful the way this election is heading, and sad that this country may be damned further down the crap hole when Palin goes to talk to Putin or anyone else… no wonder the Europenas are laughing at us… the republicans just know they can trust the ignorance of the uninformed and the racism of the many who hate real change. Hypocrisy is the order of the day and posterity will look back and remember just how stupid and biggoted this generation is. The media is a biased joke… am very certain whatever questions Palin faces, she would have had them already, just like how McCane had them before hand with that Evangelical guy… as for the pundits on TV, man how I wish i could ask them a few questions… STUPID STUPID STUPID, that’s what we are… heaven help us see the truth and what the republicans represent LIES!!!!!!!!
Finally… to all the republicans that are going to spew Venom… stop and think about this for a second… How many sons and daughters of this great country have died for this lie.. THERE ARE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION!!! Think for a change please… now read the crap Palin said above and the explanation give… Republicana LIE… God help us all…
Posted by: JohnF | September 8, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Obama voted FOR ‘Bridge to Nowhere’….he must have been lacking in 3000 advisers that day.
Posted by: Larissa | September 8, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Sarah flip-flop, flip-flop, flip-flop.
Posted by: Wm. J. LePetomaine | September 8, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
ABC, start getting it “right”, report the news with some semblance of journalistic pride, or just change your name to NBC and stop confusing us.
Posted by: GS | September 8, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
McCain’s hypocrisy is seemingly endless. Now he names this airhead pit bull as VP? Sells out to the right wing whack-job evangelicals. He will do anything to get elected, most of all exploiting his POW status.
Posted by: Wm. J. LePetomaine | September 8, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
OBAMA LIED IN HIS INTERVIEW YESTERDAY
I graduated in 1979 and registered for the Selective Service. I even considered joining the military.
SELECTIVE SERVICE REGISTRATION BEGAN JUNE 1980
Posted by: Democrats for McCain | September 8, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
“This just proves that there are more mindless followers than right thinking people. There is the truth supported by facts, then there is what you want to believe. It comes from a history of racism and bigotry. McCain an Palin shovels loads of bs on the masses who know in their heart of hearts that it’s all BS but because of personal prejudice, they support more of the same. We all know that Palin is a fraud put out ”
Keith Olbermann is that you? Sorry to hear about you losing your anchor job. Hey, but maybe you can get your job at ESPN back.
Posted by: Mack | September 8, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
Did Barry forget to mention that he voted for it TWICE? Once when he could have voted to divert the funds to KATRINA VICTIMS instead?
I am not sure that this Bridge to No Where is where Barry wants to go on a record of accomplishment if I were in his shoes …. but hey, I’m voting for McCain/Palin so as they like to say … Bring it!
Posted by: beebop | September 8, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
See Jake’s new post. D’Oh oabamabots. Even Democrats admits Palin killed the bridge. give it up . And if she is wrong -why is Fannie Mae and Freddie MAc costing taxpayers $200 billion? They are private right? We are not buying the media’s spin.
Posted by: geevill | September 8, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
What has Obama ever done…Nothing
I think Palin is awesome! A true maverick!
Democrat for Palin/McCain – Change we will vote for!
Posted by: pat | September 8, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
US vet…let’s see how you like Palin when she hits our librarys and removes books she feels are inappropriate. She did it in Alaska…..
Posted by: newvoter | September 8, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Even if Palin had not done half of what she has done she would still have done 100% more than what Obama has done.
Posted by: Jason | September 8, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Obama and Biden voted for the Bridge! So he can babble all he wants; at least she did something about it.
Posted by: NJH | September 8, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
One of the books Palin wanted banned from the Wasilla Library was “Little Red Riding Hood!” You can’t make this stuff up! When the Librarian stood up to her, Palin tried to have her fired. Too bad Palin was born too late.
Posted by: Wm. J. LePetomaine | September 8, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Now let’s remember the function and job of a Senator. Your the voice to the government for your state. If your state needs something you ask for it. Mcain is PROUD that he has never asked for an “ear mark” does that mean he hasn’t done anything for the state of AZ? And Gov Palin say’s the same thing. I would like to know, what HAVE either one done for AZ or Alaska?
Posted by: Rob | September 8, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
“She put the final stake in the project,’ Ashdown said. ‘But there was already tremendous momentum for the project to be scrapped. She gets credit for saying that they were not to go forward with the bridge, but it was at death’s door.’”
Wow…so the scandal is, instead of ending the project by starting the war against it, she ended the project because she saw the light on the waste and expense of it and exercised some good judgment.
Man…Obama got her! I am totally voting for him now! I mean he only asked for, what, a billion dollars in earmarks during his three year Senate career? And he’s been running for President for two of those. That takes skill. And I’m sure all that money he sent to the hospital where his wife worked had nothing to do with her getting a raise more than double her salary either. At all.
Posted by: frank | September 8, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
“One of the books Palin wanted banned from the Wasilla Library was “Little Red Riding Hood!” You can’t make this stuff up! When the Librarian stood up to her, Palin tried to have her fired. Too bad Palin was born too late.
I say she should ban the audacity of hope.
Posted by: Mack | September 8, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
A bridge to the airport in Ketchikan was a very good idea. I can just imagine someone from Chicago having to hop in an open boat in a blizzard to get to the airport. People and the needs of small towns require more respect from Democrats and Washington ole timers.
Obama just keep supporting those people in his home district who have been living on the taxpayers money for generations.
Posted by: Mary | September 8, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
She was for it before she was against it. Flip-Flop, diddy-bop
Posted by: Wm. J. LePetomaine | September 8, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Frank,
did she change her mind because it was the right thing to do, or only because all hell was being raised and she got caught?
Posted by: Wm. J. LePetomaine | September 8, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
LePeromaine
Sadly, the book banning smear was debunked today.
Keep your head up! Maybe she cannot bake a cake from scratch and we can say she is unpatriotic. Cake or jello molds; our next line of attack!
Yes We Jello Molds.
Posted by: Margaret | September 8, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Good fo Obama and his campaign. Slowly but certainly America will discover Palin and her strategies to fabricate the thruth. The only thing we have seen is that she can exploit her family’s misfortunes into a victim status and that is what she has done with her teenage pregnant daughter and her son with disability. Republicans can go so low in politics to exploit her two children. McSame-Palin is a bridge to nowhere. God save America from McPalin.
Posted by: BKMC | September 8, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
Obama received C’s in economics and political science while an undergraduate. That make him a medico expert in being an elected official.
Posted by: Martin | September 8, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
The truth is that Palin initially supported the bridge but once she received all the facts since declined the monies and therefore against building a bridge. As Palin stated, if Alaska wants the bridge, they would build it. Under her leadership, Alaska had so much revenue that tax payers and their family members each received a check for $1,400. Can you imagine Washington being so successful that each of your family members received $1,400 without taking a loan from future generations to pay for it.
Posted by: Dr Hubert, Lt Col, USAF, Retired (2005) | September 8, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
LePeromaine:
Yes he changed his mind. After sitting in a racist anti-American church for 20 years Obama’s mentor and spiritual adviser took center stage for 2 days and Obama threw him under the bus with “white” grandmother.
Not the Wright thing!
Posted by: Hillary - Not Vetted | September 8, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Keep it up Obama (the phony) the more you hate Palin the more we love her!
A Democrat who is thrilled to vote for Palin/McCain
Posted by: Sally | September 8, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Wm. J. LePetomaine,
It has nothing to do with “getting caught”. It has to do with making good decisions while in office. She showed good sense, and that’s what voters want.
Obama will not win using this line of attack.
Posted by: frank | September 8, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
McCain and Sarah palin aren’t the agents of change we need now. They are part of the same failed policies.You can fool people sometime but you can’t fool people all the time, so 8 years is enough.
OBAMA / BIDEN ARE THE REAL AGENTS OF CHANGE AMERICA NEEDS NOW.
Posted by: I.A.T smith | September 8, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
We’re bringing REv. Wright Back! Obama has the same extreme views as his spiritual mentor.
Palin and McCain sure do love America.
Posted by: Mike | September 8, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Three times more money is poured into the national government checkbook from sales of natural resources from federal land in Alaska than the state gets back in earmarks or other expenditures other than the military expenses there. The state of Illinois does not do that.
Posted by: Mary | September 8, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Come on people, it is up to the legislators in Washington D.C. to stop the earmarks.
Mayors and Governors have NOTHING to do with the Federal budget. Do you “really think we are that stupid?”
Posted by: jeremiah | September 8, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
Ask Obama about the $100,000 “Gazebo” built in a blighted neighborhood in Chicago. When he was in the Illinois House, he had that much money sent to rehab the area and put in a garden and landscaping and other projects to beautify the neighborhood. All that was done was a Gazebo was built that is now surrounded by weeds because he didn’t make sure the project was completed. No one knows what was done with the rest of the money.
Posted by: J.S. | September 8, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
We love pit bulls. Don’t we. can you imagin what kind of a vice president we are going to have. A pit bull and barracuda mix. Great Chaney recommends her. Need anything else to send her to the bridge to nowhere ?
Posted by: E.thomas | September 8, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
Ambinder has Palin on video talking about how the bridge was killed because she saw the writings on the wall. The video is from 2 months ago.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 8, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
Jake Tapper neglected to include the information that That’s what Frank Rich wrote in the New York Times, Sunday, Sept. 7, 2008. So, whatever small part Palin played in the cancellation of the bridge project (and it was a very small one, i.e., the very last nail in the coffin, D.B.A. — Dead Before Arrival), she didn’t reject the free hundreds of millions of dollars of our money that went to her state for a project that didn’t get built.
Posted by: Steve in Manhattan | September 8, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
JS: perhaps you can provide some link to this “gazebo” story. Prove to us this is true.
Posted by: linda n carolina | September 8, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Perhaps Trapper could give the entire story now that Alaska is front and center in the news again, it is a good time to catch up on a favorite story, The Bridge to Nowhere, using the Washington Post US Congress Votes Database.
Though Gov. Palin originally supported the earmark spending on the Ketchikan bridge (“to nowhere), she eventually killed the project, chosing to spend Federal money on other infrasturcture programs.
However, Sen. Biden and Sen. Obama voted for funding the Bridge, even when given a second chance by Sen. Tom Coburn, who proposed shifting earmark funds to Katrina relief.
Sen. McCain did not vote on the Coburn Amendment, though he is on record as opposing the Ketchikan bridge earmark.
Posted by: HarleyDavidson | September 8, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
why can’t people see that billions spent on an illegal war is an ACTUAL tax HIKE!??? wake up people… vote for Obama!
Posted by: jp | September 8, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Clueless on Iraq
In a 2007 interview with Alaska Business Monthly, she said: “I’ve been so focused on state government, I haven’t really focused much on the war in Iraq. I heard on the news about the new deployments, and while I support our president, Condoleezza Rice and the administration, I want to know that we have an exit plan in place; I want assurances that we are doing all we can to keep our troops safe. Every life lost is such a tragedy. I am very, very proud of the troops we have in Alaska, those fighting overseas for our freedoms, and the families here who are making so many sacrifice
Posted by: Ryan C | September 8, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
So is it true that Sen. Biden and Sen. Obama voted for funding the “Bridge to Nowhere” and Sarah Palin didn’t?
Posted by: jeremiah | September 8, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
I would imagine that all or most of these questions that are being bounced back and forth here regarding that infamous bridge will be posed by Charlie Gibson in his upcoming interview.
I would imagine the ratings for this interview with Gibson will be as high as for her speech at the Convention.
Brilliant marketing strategy on behalf of the GOP, I have to hand it to them.
It’s too bad that all of the questions asked on these blogs regarding OBAMA are NEVER asked in any of the millions of interviews he gives to everyone ad nauseum……
Posted by: SandyB | September 8, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Haven;t you people had enough of George Bush for 8 years,now you want McBush and that Idiot thats against everything for four more years.When are you going to learn,give Obama a chance.Enough of the failed policies,war etc that was Bush,the worst president ever.
Posted by: Ivy | September 8, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Why is the “new” Republican slogan “Change”?
Why are Republicans scrambling for “celebrity” spotlight with Palin?
Why are Republicans hiding Palin from the press?
Why are Republicans forced to commit to lies to attack Obama (and use his middle name as some symbolic evil) about his religion, name, birthright, etc.?
Desperation anyone?
Posted by: J-Tyme | September 8, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Can it be that Obama is calling FOUL. He, the DNC and the MSM have managed to cover up/explain/attack anyone for his entire campaign.
The big issue for Obama is to show us the following.
Obams’s Occidental College records
Obama’s Columbia College records
Obama’s Columbia Thesis paper
Obama’s Harvard College records
Obama’s Selective Service Registration
Obama’s Medical records
Obama’s Illinois State Senate records
A certified copy of Obama’s Original Birth Certificate
Obama’s embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth
Any Obama Harvard Law Review articles that were published (I have found one.)
Obama’s University of Chicago scholarly articles or publications.
What was Obama’s religion before he became a Christian??
Mr. Obama is being considered for the highest job in America, and he should provide the above as if he would be interviewing for that position in Corporate Amercian.
It is sad when the members of his OWN PARTY can not list his accomplishments, either in the State government or now as a Senator. They say it does not matter about the above because he graduated in the top 10% of his Harvard Law Class.
Posted by: Bob Miller | September 8, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
as always, republicans talk a big game and are zero delivering. yap yell bag. like running for a fraternity.
answer this right-wing nuts: we’ve $1 trillion debt on books now. $9 trillion in 10 years if mccain doubles down on w’s tax cuts (borrowed from china with interest). if not, we ‘just’ have a $4 trillion hole with w in 10 years.
so far mccain has identified $18 *billion* in cuts, all from the infamous earmarks. $1 trillion – $18 billion = squat. basic math folks.
republican politics = squat.
get back to reality. enough already.
Posted by: theo | September 8, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Looking at the ad closely, you’ll see that the headlines are dated for McCain and more recent for Palin.
On McCain being a maverick: 2003 & 2004
On Palin being a maverick: December 2007 and Aug. 30, 2008.
Palin supported the bridge to nowhere when she ran for Governor in 2006.
Except for wanting to permit prescription drugs from Canada in 2007, McCain hasn’t been much of a maverick.
And picking Palin over Lieberman, who he really wanted for VP, makes me think he is not his own man.
Posted by: cincyr | September 8, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
Talking about Judgement of VP candidates. I took following from Wikipedia about Joe Biden:
1. Joe Biden stated in 2002 that Saddam Hussein was a threat to national security, and that there was no option but to eliminate that threat
2. In October 2002, Biden voted in favor of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, justifying the Iraq War.
So, Question for Mr. Obama: Did Mr. Biden invent himself to join him?
Posted by: Tim | September 8, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
JPT – why not report Obama’s and Biden’s stance on the “Bridge to Nowhere”? At least Palin came to the right conclusion. Obama on the other hand continues to be the ultimate hypocrite.
Posted by: Padhorn | September 8, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Rhetoric and hyperbole. Someone please just give me a concrete reason to vote for Obama. At least the neighbor was honest when she said, because he makes her feel good.
But everywhere else I look, rhetoric and hyperbole. Then I looked up S.2248, Obama’s Global Poverty Act bill, that transfers 0.7% of our GDP directly to the UN…
Posted by: j munroe | September 8, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Obillion in pork.
Posted by: Mjöllnir | September 8, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
j munroe: Here’s two concrete reasons to vote for Obama. 1. Bush & Cheney just endorsed Palin. Means – NO CHANGE
2. Obama’s not using Bush’s speechwriters to tell him what to do say but Palin is.
Bottom line, if you like the way things has been for the last 8 years, and if you don’t care that Bush lied about the Iraq which lead to the death of over 4000 servicemembers than McCain/Palin are the ones for you. Enough said.
Posted by: vote4peace | September 8, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Actually vote4change, I do like the way “things has been” for the most part. There are some changes I would like to see but not a total change in a messed up direction. I love America!
Posted by: GoodChange | September 8, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
She was lying about her stance on the Bridge to Nowhere. She knows it and yet repeats it endlessly. Now I just have to figure out if that’s better than not knowing the relationship between the government and FreddieMac and FannieMae.
Posted by: fishskicanoe | September 8, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Your first premise is not logical. That Bush & Cheney endorsed Palin means that they don’t endorse Obama or Barr.
And I would rather have no change, than the change Obama would bring (S.2248 = $850Bn closer to global communism).
Obama’s not using Bush’s speechwriters? What is your point? Obama has the single greatest liberal voting record in the Senate. Why would he use Bush’s speechwriters?
Bottom line: We had the lowest unemployment record in history and a booming economy until the Democrats took control of Congress. And please don’t feign concern for service members – been there, done that, seen your type before.
By the way: The House and Senate intel committees had the same information Bush had. Why is it only Bush that lied?
Posted by: munroej | September 8, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
This misses the point and so does Obama. Palin said at least twice that she told “Congress” no thank you to the bridge to nowhere, suggesting that she said np thank you to the money. That’s false. Alaska received the money from the original bill but removed the earmark. Alaska kept the money so she didn’t say no thank you to Congress. It just isn’t true. She just said no when it came to spending some of Alaska’s money for the bridge. Her remarks are offensive. By the way, on Palin’s watch Alaska did keep more than $20 million earmarked for the Gravina Island (less than 100 inhabitants) road that’s been constructed even though the road serves no purpose since it was suppose to connect to the bridge.
Posted by: Harold L | September 8, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Correction: Global Poverty Act is S.2433. (Doesn’t anyone check these things?)
Posted by: munroej | September 8, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
© 2008 WorldNetDaily
Sen. Barack Obama, perhaps giving America a preview of priorities he would pursue if elected president, is rejoicing over the Senate committee passage of a plan that could end up costing taxpayers billions of dollars in an attempt to reduce poverty in other nations.
The bill, called the Global Poverty Act, is the type of legislation, “We can – and must – make … a priority,” said Obama, a co-sponsor. [...]
Posted by: munroej | September 8, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
I’m afraid I have to disagree with Senator Obama on that point… at least 51% of Americans are stupid. At least.
Posted by: Kyle from TX | September 8, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Colonel, Palin had nothing to do with the $1400 to Alaskans, that comes from oil revenues and has for more years than she has been in politics. Every year from $900 to 1400 is given to individuals from the oil fund, Palin or any other governor has nothing to do with giving that money out.
Posted by: S.Ruddell | September 8, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
“Obams’s Occidental College records
Obama’s Columbia College records
Obama’s Columbia Thesis paper
Obama’s Harvard College records
Obama’s Selective Service Registration
Obama’s Medical records
Obama’s Illinois State Senate records
A certified copy of Obama’s Original Birth Certificate
Obama’s embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth
Any Obama Harvard Law Review articles that were published (I have found one.)
Obama’s University of Chicago scholarly articles or publications.
What was Obama’s religion before he became a Christian?? ”
* * * * * * *
And when you get through asking him for all of that, why don’t you ask similar questions of McCain and Ms. Palin?
Oh, that’s right, she doesn’t answer
questions from the press…
And John doesn’t let the press ride on the “straight talk express” anymore…
Hmmm…
Posted by: Thomas Jackson | September 8, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
In my opinion, McCain’s choice of Palin shows him to be incompetent and reckless. McCain had only met with Palin one time before he chose her to be his running mate. His staff had not vetted her. And yet he chose her to be a 72-76 year old heartbeat away from the presidency of the United States of America. McCain’s poor judgement appears to mirror that of Bush’s. McCain and Palin continue to give big oil ownership of America, your wallet, and eventually your mortgage. Not to mention the fact that McCain and conservative republicans have trampled upon the Constitution of the United States vehemently, (not that Americans really care about small details like that – our main concern is being able to afford gas right now.)
Posted by: True Patriot | September 8, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
This story about the lie being repeated by McCain and Palin needs to be front page news. It’s just ridiculous that a VP nominee who we know little about is feeding us an absolute lie as the little that she does tell us.
And to the racist and xenophobes talking about Obama’s religion. Stop listening to Rush and look at the FACT that Palin is a Pentecostal. These scary folks speak in tongues, pass out and otherwise display mental illness as a means of praising God. Drink the Palin Kool-Aid if you like but know the poison you drink.
Posted by: PJ | September 8, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
First of all i’m all for OBAMA, I hope the image of a woman doesn’t sway the political pull we women have in this election. It’s silly of McCain to think we lack intelligence and would vote for someone solely on their race and gender. It’s really diffucult to believe that these candidates will come through and be able to accomplish everything on their platform, it’s not a one person show. So then what can we base our vote on, personally I base mine on the essence of the human. It’s a difficult thing to do but we just have to use our best judgment of a person’s character. PJ sometimes we need to take our own advice, first of all I am a 30 something year old woman, who is a member of a pentecostal congregation. I’m a solid person with a strong BIBLICAL foundation. Please don’t call people racist and say racist things yourself, it only undermines the very valid points you make. I’m not trying to be self-righteous, but if we can’t live it, then why preach it? TV does not portray pentecostals accurately, at least not a true pentecost biblical speaking. Unfortunately for all of us whatever race, gender or religion you may belong to, their will always be wannabe’s out there who real don’t know or care about what they stand for, and those of us who are true and real get mocked for it.
Posted by: GETITSTR8 | September 8, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
The Obama supporters reject as disengenuous McCain’s claim that he and Palin are the reformers and are best suited for those who want change. The Obama people don’t understand that McCain and Palin have a long history of reform and change. McCain once said that he did not want Roe v Wade overruled but that didn’t appeal to the right wing fringe whose support he needed to win so he CHANGED his position. For the same reason he CHANGED his opinion about the agents of intolerance. He CHANGED his position on campaign finance reform. He CHANGED his position on immigration. He CHANGED his position on the Bush tax cuts. As for Palin, in her very first appearance as the VP nominee she tried to CHANGE history by telling the American people that she told congress no thank you to the bridge to nowhere even though that isn’t true. Believe them when they tell you that they favor CHANGE – just recognize it for what it really is.
Posted by: Harold L | September 8, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Before everyone gets to hypo about it. There are tons of bridges to nowhere. San Padre Island has a bridge just for beach resorts, Key West has a very very long bridge to it aqain just for a resort town. I bet you can find a road or two to nowhere as well, do you want me to find them. The good old US of A ignored Alaska from 1865 until Ted Stevens and Don Young starting getting infra structure earmarks. Oh I forget you did need to develop some things for your protection during WWII. Talk about a road to nowhere the ALCAN. And our pipeline goes from shore to shore. Get off it. Sarah did do something for my family she has helped me meet my energy bills non of the other three have done more then talk. She has gotten a pipeline started (the first thing to getting it done is the contract by the way), which means she has actually done something for you all ,too. None of the other three have done more then talk. Jake your confused.
Posted by: Hank Irelan | September 8, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
If republicans are elected in nov then U.S will be on path of bridge to nowhere.
there is no political wisdom among voters in u.s.
more wars more fear mongering. more basic rights taken away in the name of security
Posted by: max | September 8, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Obama and his media buddies are desperate.
Obama and co. are now reduced to equivocating about a politician that plays politics better than they do. I would laugh it it wasn’t so pathetic.
Posted by: reason | September 8, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Come on, how is it desperate to point out the lies of the other side, especially as this particular issue is central to why McCain picked Palin in the first place?
McCain chose Palin on the basis of her supposed positions against pork, and now we’re finding out that she was up to ears in it. McCain was the desperate one. He need a game changer. Didn’t vet her well enough, and now the truth is slowly starting to emerge.
Posted by: Mark O | September 9, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am
She changed her opinion after learning the facts, that’s a good thing.
Why is it when Obama changes his mind/opinion on a issue the liberal bias media calls it a flip-flop but when the republicans flip-flop they call it a lie?
Are these Obama Flip-Flops or Lies:
Rev Wright – I can no more disown him than I can the black community. Then a month later he disowned both Rev Wright and his church.
Illegal immigration – First he opposed cracking down on businesses that hire illegal immigrants, now he supports it.
Marijuana – First he supported the decriminalization of marijuana now he opposes it.
Cuba Embargo – First he said it as “to end the embargo with Cuba” now he wants to continue it.
Public Financing – Obama became the first candidate to reject public financing for the general election after earlier promises to accept it.
Gun Control – now favors an individual’s right to own a gun.
Posted by: Brooker | September 9, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
to say that she merely changed her mind through educational rigor is an absurd intellectual dishonesty. but it strikes at why some folks call Obama a flip flopper but call Palin a liar – its because Obama flip flops and Palin lies…neither is good but one thing is worse. Obama doesn’t deny the existence of his previous positions – he doesn’t deny facts, he simply changed his mind (usually with a pretty thorough explanation as to why, so even if you disagree with his “why”, hard to call it a lie when he’s not denying anything), while Palin’s responses are very different – she makes claims of pure fact about past events; that she never held those positions, never made those statements, gives us the impression that she actually “sold” the plane on ebay, was never involved with the Alaskan independance movement, that she never accepted any earmmarks, didn’t play that earmark game at all b/c she was above it, didn’t tolerate lobbyists, and always, always opposed the bridge to nowhere…inspite of the 27MM she lobbied for and got for her home town, except for the lobbyists she hired, and except for the support of the bridge she openly offered. That’s not just changing your mind, that’s deceiving and concealing the original facts and events – that’s lying. But then I guess her ease with this type of intellectual dishonesty explains why she still believes in abstinence only education, why she doesn’t believe in evolution, and why she thinks facts and truth are the pesky musings of those annoying hyper elite people in those big cities she hears about. She didn’t change her mind after getting educated on the topics. On some things like the bridge to nowhere, she changed her mind after her position became unpopular, on other things she just changed the facts to suit her.
Can’t wait for the debates
Posted by: cnote | September 9, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
WHA!!!! The liberal media!!! I am crying my eyes out at how liberal they are!!!
Hmmm… but what I do wonder is why the liberal media gives John McCain a free pass on everything. What I do wonder about them is why they are intimidated by the McCain campaign, who dictates his and his lying running mates message.
Republicans don’t even know what their own values are. I can say it for them though: Republican value voters destroy our country. You vote for idiots because of your precious “values” and the rest of the country suffers as a result. A hockey mom is more important to you than actual issues. The Republicans play you like a violin and you buy the same stale brand every time. Then what happens? You watch as Republican leaders send your children to war. You watch as your best economic interests go down the toilet. Then what do you do to fix it? You vote for another idiot because they share your “values!” Maybe you should start actually paying attention to the issues and abandon this notion that somehow a politician that consistently lies to you and really has no interest in your well being, actually shares your values.
Posted by: Jman | September 9, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Obama protests if someone else other than him changes their position, this from a guy that couldn’t take a position over 130 in IL…
Posted by: GrandDadBuzz | September 9, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Where is the bridge????
Oh, Maybe, Obama will tell the trues and show us where it is.
Posted by: Wayne | September 9, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Where is the bridge????
Oh, Maybe, Obama will tell the truth and show us where it is.
Posted by: Wayne | September 9, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm