Obama Picks Up Phone on Economy
ABC’s Sunlen Miller reports: Since yesterday, Sen. Barack Obama has spoken on the phone with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd, Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Chuck Schumer, Rep. Ralph Emmanuel, former President Bill Clinton and Sen. Hillary Clinton about the economic situation and the plan for dealing with it.
Spokesperson Linda Douglass says that the conversations were about devising a "quick, bipartisan solution" to the economic crisis and they touched on the principles that Obama laid out in a speech in Charlotte, N.C., today.
"As of now, the Bush administration has only offered a concept with a staggering price tag, not a plan," Obama said. "Even if the U.S. Treasury recovers some or most of its investment over time, this initial outlay of up to $700 billion is sobering. And in return for their support, the American people must be assured that the deal reflects the basic principles of transparency, and fairness, and reform. We can’t allow this to happen again. They have run this government, they have run this economy into the ground. We’ve got to make sure that we lift if back up, but we’ve got to have some rules in place to make sure it doesn’t happen again."
Obama set out seven principles (several of which he has regularly mentioned on the campaign trail) for what he would like to see included in the government’s bailout plan.
- No blank check. If we grant the Treasury broad authority to address the immediate crisis, we must insist on independent accountability and oversight. Given the breach of trust we have seen and the magnitude of the taxpayer money involved, there can be no blank check.
- Rescue requires mutual responsibility. As taxpayers are asked to take extraordinary steps to protect our financial system, it is only appropriate to expect those institutions that benefit to help protect American homeowners and the American economy. We cannot underwrite continued irresponsibility, where CEOs cash in and our regulators look the other way. We cannot abet and reward the unconscionable practices that triggered this crisis. We have to end them.
- Taxpayers should be protected. This should not be a handout to Wall Street. It should be structured in a way that maximizes the ability of taxpayers to recoup their investment. Going forward, we need to make sure that the institutions that benefit from financial insurance also bear the cost of that insurance.
- Help homeowners stay in their homes. This crisis started with homeowners and they bear the brunt of the nearly unprecedented collapse in housing prices. We cannot have a plan for Wall Street banks that does not help homeowners stay in their homes and help distressed communities.
- A global response. As I said on Friday, this is a global financial crisis and it requires a global solution. The United States must lead, but we must also insist that other nations, who have a huge stake in the outcome, join us in helping to secure the financial markets.
- Main Street, not just Wall Street. The American people need to know that we feel as great a sense of urgency about the emergency on Main Street as we do the emergency on Wall Street. That is why I call on Senator McCain, President Bush, Republicans and Democrats to join me in supporting an emergency economic plan for working families – a plan that would help folks cope with rising gas and food prices, save one million jobs through rebuilding our schools and roads, help states and cities avoid painful budget cuts and tax increases, help homeowners stay in their homes, and provide retooling assistance to help ensure that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built in America.
- Build a regulatory structure for the 21st Century. While there is not time in a week to remake our regulatory structure to prevent abuses in the future, we should commit ourselves to the kind of reforms I have been advocating for several years. We need new rules of the road for the 21st Century economy, together with the means and willingness to enforce them.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
I agree with Obama. He is NOW acting like a leader and I’m impressed. Now if he can get the rest of the dems behind him and not back down, he will have passed a huge test!
Posted by: veronica, Atlanta, GA. | September 21, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
This is very smart of Obama for waiting till he gets all the facts before making his informed decision.
McCain on the other hand jumped all over this issue on friday talking pointing fingers and saying he opposed a bailout only to come out the next day to reverse his position. After been a champion of deregulation for more than 26 years, McCain has made a 180 degree to support Obama`s call for more regulation.
These are the two different kinds of leadership styles we can chose from. One is all talk about experience while the other displays intelligence and good judgment.
Obama 08
Posted by: Krista | September 21, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Those are the statements of today. He was so Presidential and the speech was so penetrating that my friend broke down in tears. She is about lose her home. I pray he wins.
Posted by: vuzous | September 21, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Judgment over experience. The choice is clear. Once again Obama has been right and McCain has been wrong for 26 years of calling for deregulation.
Obama 08
Posted by: Keith | September 21, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
I’m glad Ralph Emmanuel is on the case.
Posted by: Levi Johnston | September 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Sorry, meant she is about to lose her home.
Posted by: vuzous | September 21, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
This is no specifics, Obama has no plan. How can we expect him to lead?
Posted by: midwestmom | September 21, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Impressive economic outline by Obama. Real leadership for a change. And he consulted with all the knowledgeable, key players. Average Americans should not be asked to pick up this price tag without ensuring that their interests are protected and advanced. It’s time for a new, fair deal for the middle class folk who do the heavy lifting of the American economy. This is the end of the “ugly American” Bush era of greed, selfishness and corruption.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
“How can we expect him to lead?”
..asks midwestmom?! Seriously? How about you hit “refresh” on your browser and read this article one more time. There is a seven-point plan?
Oh, but wait. You say that “Obama has no plan.”
You know, some people will just never get it. Midwestmom, maybe you need an election-season time-out until you can think more clearly.
Posted by: Finally | September 21, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
The palin bounce is over. Voters are realizing that this is serious business, not the junior prom. palin will head back up north after November and mccain should retire with his millionaire wife in one of the 9 houses they own. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | September 21, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Midestmom shows her ignorance by not understanding roles & responsibilities, as well as the process that goes into implementing actionable plans.
Obama has clearly outlined the guidelines. Right now Paulson has NO specifics other than he wants Congress to give him a blank check to do whatever he wants.
The first part of establishing any plan is to set guidelines and parameters, and then breaking them further into details. Secondly that’s what the Banking Committee should be working on. Can you honestly say that George W. Bush is in his office typing up a detailed plan?
One thing that I can’t stand are people who are stupid and yet spout off opinions. We just have WAY too many idiots in America today.
Posted by: Susan | September 21, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
I read Hillary’s comments on Politico and she was right on. I pray he continues to call on her if he gets the white house because, it seems he needs her help and everyone elses.
Posted by: rachel | September 21, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Pander.
Posted by: John | September 21, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Midwestmom…….You do not like have to like Obama, but you surely must be able to recognise a good plan when you seen one…but then rage can make us blind
Posted by: African At Large | September 21, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Midwestmom, what do you mean Obama has no plan? What precisely is the Bush plan? Asking for $700 billion with no oversight, no judicial review, and no post hoc adjustments?!? That’s a real humdinger coming from our President….
Obama has been calling for a new regulatory structure, much like the New Deal did under FDR. Do you expect him to talk point by point about the specifics?
Obama’s seven principles are far more detailed than anything Bush or McCain has put out; all McCain wants to do is fired the SEC Chief. Not much of a plan there.
Midwestmom, wake up!!! The Republicans have run this country into the ground. What could Obama possibly do that would be worse?
Posted by: TheOpinionGuy | September 21, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
By midwesternmom
“This is no specifics, Obama has no plan. How can we expect him to lead?“
_________________________________________
Wow!! Take a nap.
Posted by: Todd | September 21, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Obama is a leader and McCain is a whiner.
Posted by: betty | September 21, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
midwestmom:
No one has specific plan including John McCain. How can you have specific plan if you can’t get all the facts right?
This is like sailing in a new area, you don’t know what you will face on the way to the shore, the only thing is to set up guidelines and deal with what to come. In fact, it sounds childish that anyone who can present a specific plan in a day or two to this huge problem. That’s another reason that we can’t afford McCain/Palin ticket.
Posted by: sarah | September 21, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
It all comes down to whether or not you think we should continue the bush policies. If you think the war should continue indefinitely, while we spend $10,000,000,000 a month, and you think that bush has done well with the economy then mc-more-war is your man. If you think that it’s time we start to get out of iraq and do some positive things for the average American instead of just the top 1% then vote for Obama.
Posted by: pt | September 21, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
This is a good outline, but I am not convinced that Obama is ready to lead this nation. This crisis is exceeds 9/11 in financial cost. Obama was too slow to come out and reassure the American people. He hid behind his stump speeches with empty rhetoric. And now, after every expert and pundit and advisor has offered opinions and advice, Obama has something to say. The phone rang at 3 am and Obama did not answer!!
Posted by: JH | September 21, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
MidWestMom. Here are the specifics you requested:
http://my.barackobama.com/page/s/economyplan
Posted by: The Truth | September 21, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
After running the country to the ground, McCain and republicans want another four years and it ceases to amaze me how some people are still supporting him.
Wake up America. Republics have shown that they have no idea how to run our economy. The Chinese and Russians are catching up.
Posted by: Todd | September 21, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Very strange that some American seriously consider John McCain a very suitable candidate for the role of POTUS. I am no fan of Romney, but he would have been a very qualified candidate. McCain’s choice of Palin was his first really said a lot about a man who didi not ssem to appreciate the stakes. Senator Kay would have been an excellent choice.
And his inability to comprehend the precarious nature of the global economy is shocking!!!
Posted by: Kojo | September 21, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
JH
In jumping all over the news to present a wrong plan when he didnt even know the facts, there is absolutely no doubt that McCain acted in a reckless. No doubt he had to come out the next day to reverse his position.
Obama considers the facts and makes a firm decision but McCain will always rush and then make a u-turn. He has no judgment to lead.
Posted by: Keith | September 21, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Ron Paul saw this financial mess coming
It’s not like there wasn’t anybody who saw the economic woes of the week on the horizon.
On Sept. 10, 2003, U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, testified before House Financial Services Committee, which was holding hearings regarding special privileges extended to government sponsored enterprises (GSEs). Think Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In his testimony. Paul criticized such privileges in general and warned of the potential for disaster posed by government involvement with Fannie and Freddie specifically.
Paul noted that according to the Congressional Budget Office, housing related GSEs received $13.6 billion in indirect federal subsidies in fiscal 2000 and had a line of credit with the United States Treasury exceeding $2 billion. That line of credit Paul said was an explicit promise by the Treasury to bail out GSE’s in times of economic difficulty. (Sound familiar?)
“[The line of credit] helps the GSEs attract investors who are willing to settle for lower yields than they would demand in the absence of the subsidy,” Paul testified. “Thus, the line of credit distorts the allocation of capital. More importantly, the line of credit is a promise on behalf of the government to engage in a huge unconstitutional and immoral income transfer from working Americans to holders of GSE debt.”
As Paul saw the situation some five years ago, the government backing isolated GSE management from market discipline. If Fannie and Freddie were not underwritten by the federal government, he told the committee, investors would demand the institutions held to higher management and accounting practices.
“Ironically, by transferring the risk of a widespread mortgage default, the government increases the likelihood of a painful crash in the housing market,” Paul predicted. “This is because the special privileges granted to Fannie and Freddie have distorted the housing market by allowing them to attract capital they could not attract under pure market conditions. As a result, capital is diverted from its most productive use into housing. This reduces the efficacy of the entire market and thus reduces the standard of living of all Americans.
“Despite the long-term damage to the economy inflicted by the government’s interference in the housing market, the government’s policy of diverting capital to other uses creates a short-term boom in housing,” Paul went on. “Like all artificially created bubbles, the boom in housing prices cannot last forever. When housing prices fall, homeowners will experience difficulty as their equity is wiped out. Furthermore, the holders of the mortgage debt will also have a loss. These losses will be greater than they would have otherwise been had government policy not actively encouraged over-investment in housing.
“I hope today’s hearing sheds light on how special privileges granted to GSEs distort the housing market and endanger American taxpayers,” Paul concluded. “Congress should act to remove taxpayer support from the housing GSEs before the bubble bursts and taxpayers are once again forced to bail out investors who were misled by foolish government interference in the market.”
On the same day, Paul introduced the “Free Housing Market Enhancement Act.” The legislation would have removed government subsidies from the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and the National Home Loan Bank Board. The bill had no cosponsors; it stalled in the committee process.
A plan at ready
The past few days, major party presidential candidates have scrambled to come up with a solution to the financial crisis on Wall Street and members of Congress and the media have been searching through the thesaurus to find synonyms for “greed.” Writing in “Forbes” back in March in an op-ed entitled “the Rapidly Approaching Economic Meltdown,” Paul proposed a four-part plan calling for lower taxes, less spending, a sound monetary policy and regulatory reform. His plan would:
• Make the Bush tax cuts permanent, repeal the estate tax, end taxes on Social Security benefits, end taxes on income from tips, end taxes on forgiven mortgage debt, and end the income tax and abolish the IRS;
• Reform spending by first cutting back on “our trillion-dollar overseas budget” and shore up the “programs Washington has forced so many citizens to depend on,” while enabling young people to opt out of these programs and save for their own retirements and health care needs.” Veto any unbalanced budget.
Paul argued that lower taxes and less government spending put more money in working people’s pocket — pretty standard Republican line. But he also opined for bolder out-of-the-box actions calling for a sound monetary policy to increase the value of money and drive down the cost of living and a regulatory approach that is the inverse of what we’re hearing from presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama. Paul proposed:
• Requiring more transparency at the Federal Reserve Board and legalizing competing currencies. He cited the historical evidence of the inevitable failure of paper money systems. However, “I believe that for our economy to be secure in the long term,” he wrote, “Congress must reassert its authority and end the unconstitutional Federal Reserve.”
• Undertake regulatory reform and revisit the myriad federal regulations that “have stymied the innovative spirit of the American people.” At the top of the list Paul put Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) — regulation imposed after the spate of corporate scandals earlier in the decade.
In his Forbes article, Paul noted three studies. A survey by Financial Executives International put the average cost of compliance with SOX at $4.4 million. The American Economics Association estimated SOX could cost American Companies as much as $35 billion in aggregate. Wharton Business School found that the number of American companies delisting from public stock exchanges nearly tripled the year after SOX became law (198 firms “went dark” compared to 67 the year before).
“One of the best things Congress could do for the American economy is to repeal this damaging legislation,” Paul wrote.
Economic lifeblood
In short, Paul’s message is that money is the lifeblood of any economy, and control over a nation’s currency means control over its economic well-being. Fed bankers quite literally determine the value of our money by controlling the supply of dollars and establishing interest rates. Their actions can make us richer or poorer overnight, in terms of the value of our savings and the buying power of our paychecks. How’s that been working out for you lately?
Paul concludes his piece with a call to return to principle that is, perhaps, even more fitting today than earlier in the year.
“Unless we embrace fundamental reforms, we will be caught in a financial storm that will humble this great country as no foreign enemy ever could,” he wrote. “We can find safe harbor in our ideals. Reclaiming our historic legacy of principled commitment to liberty will, once again, unleash the innovative spirit that propelled our nation to the heights of prosperity.”
Or, we could keep putting lipstick on a pig.
Posted by: Someone did predict this | September 21, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
If Congress bails out Wall Street and it turns out to be another scam by the Bush administration it will be the Democrats who will be held responsible. I am a Democrat and will vote a straight Democrat ticket Nov. 4. But I don’t trust Bush, Paulson or Bernanke. You had better be right about this or the hell with party affiliation. I think it is best to take your time and do it right if you do it at all. I am tired of Washington and its failures and although I could never vote Republican I can not and will not vote at all if you are wrong in bailing Wall Street out, no matter if it includes independent oversight, protections for homeowners and constraints on excessive executive compensation. Be right on this or the country will never trust any of you.
Posted by: Jerry Gifford | September 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Nothing new here, where is this idea xeroxed from??
It’s like student’s thesis outline in school project, not deep.
Posted by: golfgirlusa | September 21, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
JH……prsidents ar not supposed to decisions off the cuff….you consult and then you decide…againyou do not have to like Barack’s candidacy….but to splash such comments on this blog display a level of ignorance not found in most places around the world.
Plese be considered in your comments
Posted by: African At Large | September 21, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Go Obama! Hardball ‘em all the way. If they want our money, they’d better give it up OR be prepared for the whole system to crumble. This ain’t no charity for the wealthy! This is business! Paulson’s got a week to decide.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 21, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
Don’t you people see he was TOLD what to say by those on the call list?
They worked night and day to make it a political hit against Bush. Of course it’s his fault!
If your Obama wins it will take GENERATIONS to get this country back on track again. Jimmy Carter was bad enough. How many of you remember 14% home loans and gas lines?
Well get ready, this time it will be much worse. The people mentioned above including Obama are some of the biggest crook in Washington and most incompetent as well.
You have been warned!
Posted by: Obrother | September 21, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
JH,
Just like Paulson stole the plan of the now bankrupt Lehman, Obama wasn’t about to let McCain/Bush steal his economic plan. McCain has attempted to steal the “change” message, the “environmentalist” message and many, many more ideas from Obama.
=========
Paulson wants 700B without any details or explanation other than fear!
U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Paulson is a Republican. He was also the CEO of Goldman Sachs, the company that forced Lehman out of business with short-sales and rumor-mongering. Lehman is the only company the Bush regime forced into bankruptcy while all the other Wall Street gang gets a bail-out.
Paulson has worked for Republicans his entire life — as far back as the Nixon administration.
The Republican SEC Chairman, Christopher Cox was not asleep at the wheel. He deliberately left Lehman, Fannie and Freddie to fight off the rest of the Wall Street gang by NOT enforcing current laws on short-selling. When forced, he put in place some new rules that should have been made permanent. Instead, he let the rules expire. During the expired month which left the market unregulated, Lehman, Fannie and Freddie all failed. Immediately following these beat-downs of these companies, Cox made permanent the rules that would have saved them.
This is no coincidence. This is the Republican machine and cronism working as intended.
Just like in physical war, when it comes to financial battles, the Republican machine is as vindictive as ever. They have no shame. You’re either with them or they will crush you in the name of protecting the tax payer.
Lord help us if the Republicans “deregulate” any other major industry and bail them out when the bubbles burst at taxpayer expense.
At some point, the American taxpayers are going to call for an investigation of these Republican crooks. We’re just waiting to see which one of Bush’s friends buys up all these assets at reduced prices.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 21, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
I too am stunned that there are still some people willing to reward a Party that has unleashed such devastation on America. A disastrous war in Iraq and an economy driven by unchecked corporate greed. Average Americans are paying for these colossal blunders and will pay for some time to come. Yet still some want to reward McCain and the GOP with yet another four years! If McCain is elected and the GOP is given a thumbs-up for the hellstorm they’ve brought down on America, as bad as it is, we ain’t seen nothing yet!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Just because mc-more-war was a pow does not mean he should be president. The guy used to have a spine but now is nothing but a flip-flopper and a panderer. He’s also an OLD fart. The real straight-talker, John Murtha said that the Presidency is no place for an OLD man. There’s a reason they make pilots retire at age 60. mc-more-war needs to retire with his millionaire wife. (The one he had an affair with after his first wife waited for him to come back from the war.) Obama 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | September 21, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
pt—-One thing that I can’t stand are people who are stupid and yet spout off opinions.
Worse than that—those people VOTE! Scarey!
Posted by: beckiemasn | September 21, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Bush has nothing left. The driver of this deal is Obama and the election isn’t for another few weeks.
Posted by: Siren | September 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
SORRY, BUT NO PRE-EMPTIVE BAILOUT
PAULSON’S IDEOLOGY IS TO PRIVATIZE EVERYTHING. DON’T BUY THIS LAST STAB BY THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION TO HAMSTRING THE ECONOMY.
2006 ARTICLE ON PAULSON PHILOSPHY. READ IT AND WEEP.
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Sept06/Petras05.htm
Posted by: baci98 | September 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Where are you midwestmom?
Hiding in your room with your buddy, “W”?
Posted by: sjbob | September 21, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
And now we are just waiting for John Insane to come out with another brilliant idea, after consulting with his hero Phil ‘Whiners’ Gramm.
Posted by: Billy Bobson | September 21, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
MCaina showed typical impetuosity “kill-the-messenger” approach to problemsolving when he said the SEC Chairman should resign. The man’s temper is legendary and it has NOT mellowed. He is DANGEROUS.
and Sarah Palin? a whack job!
Posted by: guava boy | September 21, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
These are principles, something you might not recognize as Republicans. They’re points from a speech, you geniuses, not Obama’s detailed plan. Another Carter?! Are you kidding me! Your “Reagan Revolution” was one of the causes of this crap-tastic situation we’re all in now. Go back to your cave.
Posted by: goodforthegander | September 21, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Susan, thank you for your response to midwestmom. You were doing such a great job until the end:
“One thing that I can’t stand are people who are stupid and yet spout off opinions. We just have WAY too many idiots in America today.”
That’s not what should be about. You negated the paragraphs you spent educating her by your last one where you did nothing but insult her. Do you think she will walk away considering your points (and maybe changing her mind), or will she walk away hating the “other” side more because they are elitists who think she is stupid (just like McCain tells her)?
She’s here. She gets to “spout” her opinions just like anybody else. The objective should be to show her enough of the truth (politely) that you can change those opinions.
She’s not stupid, just uninformed. SO many Republicans and conservatives are voting Obama this year, and we need every one of them.
Posted by: dpmn | September 21, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
This plan is utter hogwash.
Barack Obama should be embarassed to put this forward.
It is on the level of a high schooler’s mentality.
“taxpayer’s investment” – give me a break. YOu mean a FORCED “INVESTMENT” of JUNK DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS???
Posted by: JA | September 21, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
McCain Supporters… With Section 8 considered can you help me understand what principles and values apply that would make you support this plan.
Did you see George Will on This Week ABC Sunday morning show? If you can’t support Obama what about a no vote or third party vote instead? I hope we can all vote by our values and principal and not blind faith.
Draft Plan Section 8: Sec. 8. Review.
Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.
Text of draft plan: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/business/21draftcnd.html?ref=business
Posted by: thatwhichisgood | September 21, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
YOu people are fools. How can Barack Obama now protect homeowners from foreclosure???
Don’t you people have minds??? If we give nearly 1 Trillion to bail out Wall St, do you think we have enough for homeowners, another 1 Trillion????
Barack Obama has just suggested spending 2 Trillion dollars. Is he insane??
Posted by: JA | September 21, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Ouch! Barack and the Black Grinch Michelle should be VERY concerned ..
http://thecolumbusdispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2008/09/21/OHIOPOLL21.ART_ART_09-21-08_A1_HDBCHUM.html?sid=101
Posted by: Marcus | September 21, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
The devil is always in the details. If we are going to bailout the financials, I agree we have got to get something tremendous in return. I think Obama is acting less socialist than the Bush administration.
Posted by: MIguy | September 21, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Hey everybody vote for me. I plan to give you:
1. Universal Health Care with no restrictions at all
2. Bail out all homeowners
3. Bail out 1 Trillion dollars of debt from Wall St financial firms
4. Give tons of money to people who don’t have any
5. Increase all social programs
6. Free college education for all!
Hey, why wouldn’t you vote for me. I’ll give everybody everything!
What’s that you say, how will we pay for this……..nevermind, shush!
Posted by: JA | September 21, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
JA, you must have special glasses because I can’t seem to find where Obama calls for a trillion in bailout for Wall Street or a trillion for homeowners… gosh is must be nice to have your amazing powers.
Posted by: bettylou | September 21, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
JA – cmon .. isn’t that the American way? SIGH!
Posted by: Marcus | September 21, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
MIguy,
Don’t you get it you fool. If we bail out Wall St there is NO MONEY LEFT FOR ANYTHING ELSE.
What will we get in return??? Obama says we should focus on getting our investment back…does he understand financial derivates?? MBS, ABS, CDOs, etc.??? Obviously not, what he is making American taxpayers buy is JUNK. WORTHLESS.
Posted by: JA | September 21, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
BettyLou,
You need to get informed you sheep. Barack Obama is supporting the bail out of Wall St firms. He has stated so repeatedly. This will cost close to 1 Trillion.
He says he wants to do this in a responsible way, and that is where his mistake is. THERE IS NO RESPONSIBLE WAY. YOU ARE MAKING THE AMERICAN TAXPAYER PURCHASE JUNK FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES PRODUCTS.
Posted by: JA | September 21, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Obama, Pelosi and Reid – the three stooges!
Posted by: dl | September 21, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
JA: So what will happen with no bailout whatsoever? What are the effects on individuals, the larger economy, retirement portfolios, etc? Please inform me.
Posted by: bettylou | September 21, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
The smart Republicans have either resigned or decided not to run for another term. The mother of all backlashes is coming in November. The GOP fatcats should take their money and run now, because we’re sick of bailing out and fattening the purses of the superrich and big corporations and paying off debts for massive BushGOP blunders! The Big Con is over and enough people are now clearly seeing what has been done to our country by these greedy losers.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 21, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Overvalued 600,000 homes are not junk. There are simply no buyers that can really afford it while there are no jobs. Thanks Republicans for outsourcing and insourcing foreigners to cripple the American buying power.
Bush’s cronism is what is at work here. Paulson is a Wall Street crook:
http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/695796.html
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 21, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Thank goodness, Dems. don’t back down on this. How about no pay at all for the failed CEO’s! If someone can afford to have 7 houses and 13 cars…they can afford no severance package. What I’m worried about is the ability to fund social programs going forward.
Posted by: kansasgal1 | September 21, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
bettylou,
It still won’t trickle down. That is what will happen.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 21, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Whatever JA and the other McSame dead-enders are smoking, I *don’t* want any.
No matter how badly Republicans screw up, it’s always Clinton’s or Carter’s fault.
The facts are these:
When Bush took office, he had an annual budget SURPLUS.
After 8 years, he has spent hundreds of billions on a failed war in Iraq (eventually will cost us $2 trillion to $3 trillion). He has given away hundreds of billions in tax cuts to the rich. He and the GOP pushed through a prescription drug plan which was a giveaway to Big Pharma and will cost us another trillion over 10 years. We have a nearly $500 billion deficit just for the fiscal year that ends 30 September.
And now he wants us to write a $700 billion blank check to Wall Street with no strings attached and no consequences for those who screwed up so badly.
So basically in 8 years, you ‘fiscal conservative’ Republicans have completely looted the public treasury.
And you think the GOP deserves another 4 years of the same policies?
You should be ashamed of yourself… if you had any shame that is.
Posted by: r€nato | September 21, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Sarah Mooseburger will save us!
Posted by: Bob | September 21, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
McCain has admitted that he sees the economy as a mystery that he doesn’t understand. Would you trust someone to do brain surgery on you if they told you brain surgery is a mystery to them?
That said, the hole dug by Bush and his deregulating Republicans is so deep, I don’t think anyone can put this country back on it’s feet. This is deadly serious business, and not a time to shun the advice of smart people or jump into specifics until you’ve worked out a complete set of ground rules.
Posted by: outerboundary | September 21, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
McCain and Sarah Palin can’t wait to get their hands on our Social Security and health care.
They know they can still squeeze something out of the middle class.
Posted by: Truth Matters | September 21, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Everyone agrees that the bailout has to happen. No bailout, world disaster. Forget the great depression, all markets across the globe are interlinked. Now, with a bailout, we have two choices:
1. Blind faith in wall street, the very folks who are only doing what they do best, covering their own back sides. We give them a blank check and we have allowed ourselves to be sold out.
2. A bailout that keeps the citizens of the US in mind. That includes holding the financial entities responsible for this mess responsible. If we each pay over a thousand dollars for this bailout, we deserve to know where the money is going and we deserve to know that it won’t happen again.
Love Obama or hate Obama, he gets credit for looking at the facts and talking frankly to us about our best options. I repeat, OUR best options. If I buy something, I want to know why, what it is, and how I will benefit from the purchase. No one else has spoken so frankly to the public yet.
We have learned some very important lessons these past two decades: honesty works, careful and consulted knowledge of the facts makes best decisions, we own this government and not the people in washington, only when Americans know what government is doing can we all succeed, and most importantly, democracy without an educated and informed voting populace is no democracy for all.
Posted by: arora | September 21, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
It doesn’t matter what 0bama says.
No one trusts him with their money.
Posted by: Jim Jones was a community organizer | September 21, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm
That’s what I thought. People are scared, freaked out, and rightly so. Yes we’re all getting screwed, royally. No one really knows how exactly this will turn out. Who in their right mind would trust W/McStain and the Republicans to fix this mess they and their failed ideology created!? Gobama!
Posted by: bettylou | September 21, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Lesser of all evils. I’d rather trust Obama with my money than any other choice we have. Bush, McCain, Wall Street, major corporations, the drug companies (shall I continue?) have all shown us that they are willing to take our money, tell us what we want to hear, and run.
Posted by: arora | September 21, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
JA…Bush is the one that wants to
GIVE Wallstreet 1 trillion of tax
payer money.
NO BLANK CHECK.
Instead of being carelessly
handed over, it can be regulated
closely and the taxpayer will have
a chance to GET MOST OF it back
with interest.
Otherwise, our coffers will be
looted again.
One thing I never understood about
the Republican ideology, is WHY
big business is good but big
government is bad. Seems to me
we need a big government to be
big enough to control big business
and enforce fairness. After all
those corporations use our society
and our people to make their
profits, they shouldn’t have a
free ride of no responsibility.
Posted by: Tina Greata | September 21, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm
JJones:
I would prefer that if you know something we don’t, you divulge it here. We are all trying to look at facts and make the best voting decisions we can. The vast problems we face require information, not vapid griping. If you have something to contribute, please do so.
Posted by: arora | September 21, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
My, my, he is calling the very people who caused this mess!! He probably really was asking them, “Are we going to jail???????????”
Posted by: LynneG | September 21, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Obama calls Pelosi and Reid. Wow! Larry, Curly and Moe to the rescue.
Posted by: dl | September 21, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
“Obama was too slow to come out and reassure the American people.”
JH, are you kidding me! McCain is the one who jumped the gun and announced he wanted to fire someone he wouldn’t be able to fire. Here are some comments about McCain’s reaction this week: George Will: “The question is, who in this crisis looked more presidential, calm and un-flustered? It wasn’t John McCain who, as usual, substituting vehemence for coherence, said ‘let’s fire somebody.’ And picked one of the most experienced and conservative people in the administration, Chris Cox, and for no apparent reason… It was un-presidential behavior by a presidential candidate.” Sam Donaldson: “The question is, who in this crisis looked more presidential, calm and un-flustered? It wasn’t John McCain who, as usual, substituting vehemence for coherence, said ‘let’s fire somebody.’ And picked one of the most experienced and conservative people in the administration, Chris Cox, and for no apparent reason… It was un-presidential behavior by a presidential candidate.” MCCAIN VOTED FOR THIS MESS WE’RE IN. (DEREGULATION!)
Posted by: Teri from Ohio | September 21, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Proof that Obama lacks judgement and confidence. Why did he need to reach out to so many people for a plan. Can Obama do anything without a teleprompter or a bunch of advisors?
If I were Hillary I would have hung up on him. He obviously didn’t think too highly of her opinion when it came to VP chosing time.
Pathetic.
Posted by: Kimberly | September 21, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
He has to call them to get their support and approval to move ahead. That’s how government is supposed to work. Glad to see he is taking leadership.
Oh, and for those who prefer McCain’s leadership better – and I mean those who prefer his positions on the issues – I ask you to look at the last financial challenge we faced. He was a Keating 5.
Instead of insults here when we have a big problem on our hands, we would all better benefit from substantial comments from opponents of this plan. Name calling doesn’t help.
Posted by: arora | September 21, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Intresting! The people who are saying negative statements about Obama must think that this crisis will all be over by the end of the week,and some how Obama should be able to fix it by then,if not, then that proves he can not lead.
Most likely these people are pretty comfortable,not facing any money problems or fear of a job loss..Yet.
Sadly these are the people will be caught off guard when payday comes and there is no paycheck, or they go to the bank and the bank door is locked.
Wake Up!!!
Posted by: D.M CA | September 21, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Sorry: here’s Donaldson’s quote:”It was two days after the he said the fundamentals of the economy were strong. His talking points have gotten all mixed up. And I think the question of age is back on the table.”
Posted by: Teri from Ohio | September 21, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Senator Obama was at the head of the line when the “hogs” lined up at the Fannie and Freddie trough for campaign bucks. The top three U.S. Senators getting big Fannie and Freddie political bucks were Democrats. Number two is Senator Barack Obama. He’s only been in the Senate four years, but still managed to grab the number two spot behind Chris Dodd who is chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. Fannie and Freddie are creations of Congressional Democrats and President Bill Clinton, designed to make mortgages available to people who couldn’t afford them. Fannie May and Freddie Mac are where big Washington Democrats to go to work in the semi-private sector and pocket millions. Clinton administration White House budget director Franklin Raines ran Fannie and collected $50 million dollars. Obama is part of the Fannie and Freddie problem, not the solution.
Posted by: abcblogger | September 21, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Hey Kimberly,
Have you read any of the posts here?
I really think you should…
Posted by: out | September 21, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
How is Obama going to have a full detailed plan when Washington doesn’t? Instead of bluster & trying to score cheap political points, Obama is calm and cool & most of all…he listens. This crisis isn’t something one person alone can solve and a half a day and hit the golf course.
Posted by: Jackson | September 21, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Kimberly,
You’re a flat out trouble maker. And sadly proud of it, without thought for the future of the country or your own family line. No time for your divisive games. We’re talking great depression here.
This is a thread about a crisis and a proposal to fix that crisis.
Tell me why the policies of the GOP are not responsible for this. I dare you to try. And tell me what specifically in Obama’s plan you object to. Please.
Posted by: arora | September 21, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Wow! Obama is even more clueless than I thought. He is calling the very people who put us into this mess and who have failed to lead for advice. The man is dangerous and should be no where near the White House. He is a fool who would lead the US to a socialsist hellhole. People, please do like many od us have done…research before you vote. Obama would be a huge mistake.
Posted by: dana | September 21, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
abcblogger, you hit he nail right on the head!!! They should all be in jail, right along with Obama!
Posted by: L. Graham | September 21, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
arora, did you even read abcblogger’s post. That is it in a nutshell! Your own Chris Dodd was on the banking committee!!!
Posted by: LynneG | September 21, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Don’t worry Democrats, Obama’s Mideast friends, plus George Soros, will bail us out!! We’ll just live under Sharia law and that will solve everything…
Posted by: LynneG | September 21, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
The list of people he consulted with is very enligtening. Of course, Barney and Chris can give him some ideas, considering they have had strategic roles for oversight and did nothing. Then, there are the Clintons who finally have some stature in leadership coming from a green inexperienced candidate who denigrated them throughout the campaign. I am not certain that there is enough time for him to make crucial decisions in an emergency. That is a long list of consultants. How impressive!
Posted by: georgia | September 21, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
How is it that these companies with all their MBA’s didn’t plead mea culpa sooner. Once again the Republicans use terrorism, as their modus operandi! So where’s Curve Ball, how many subprime mortgages are in default, we have computers don’t we, this is financial terrorism they’re crying, going to war on taxpayers money. Those who foreclosed on their properties knew months in advance that the money wasn’t there. So just tell the public, trust me, I ran Goldman Sachs! Nader and Ron Paul are looking better day by day!
Posted by: Nicolette | September 21, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Beside the issue, Lynne. Dodd is a politician like all the rest. He doesn’t belong to me any more than he belongs to you.
Yeah, a lot of folks pushing the numbers of what Obama received from Freddie/Fannie are reacting to the wrong statistics.
We’re in crisis mode and we should be looking at the best plan to bail out these orgs that are threatening to take our economy – and our entire way of life – out.
Now I know you’ve heard all sorts of bad nasty things about the candidate. If you listen open mindedly, I’m sure you’ll find that you’re getting too excited about the wrong information.
On the freddie/fannie thing, maybe you should look at where McCain gets his money, and how much. Information means nothing when its in a vacuum.
Posted by: arora | September 21, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Typical Obama! I wonder where he plagarized this list! Protecting the taxpayers!!!!Ha Ha Ha…since when did that become a priority for the very Democrats who not only created this mess but profited by it and will continue to profit from it! Obama…what a joke!
Posted by: Independent | September 21, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Well, well. Looks like despite what Sarah Palin says, Obama DOES HAVE A PLAN AFTER ALL. Not only that, it makes sense. What Republican wouldn’t want to add more regulatory oversight and protect the taxpayers and homeowners right?!
Posted by: Gerald Shields, Seattle, WA | September 21, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
I saw a video where Obama was at a Black Caucus meeting and the goal of the meeting was Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac — to assure blacks of owning a home whether they could qualify or even pay back the loan. He was the number two guy receiving bonuses or commissions from these loans — along with Sen Dodd who was number 1! I don’t like McCain either, so I’m putting all my money on Sarah. And I really love this energy bill the Democratic House passed — what a joke! And remember the Democrats have been in charge since 2004 and have planned this big crisis to happen right before the election. Their timing was perfect! They would rather sell out this country if it gave them power and that is just what they are doing. So vote for your Muslim and God help you.
Posted by: LynneG | September 21, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
abcblogger, you need to get your facts straight: Your numbers are from just employees. If you look at the contributions from Fannie and Freddie’s BOARDS OF DIRECTORS AND LOBBYIST – MCCAIN TOPS THE LIST! “The New York Times looked at contributions from Fannie and Freddie’s boards of directors and lobbyists, who are technically not employees. That analysis found Fannie and Freddie-related contributors gave $116,000 to John McCain and his related committees, compared with $16,000 to Obama and his related committees.”
Posted by: Teri from Ohio | September 21, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm
A couple of points that the Obama leftists have missed:
1.) The last thing that this market is is “de-regulated.” It’s de-regulated like the California energy market was “de-regulated” a few years ago.
2.) Obama’s “plan” contains NO DETAILS. Read the seven points again and show me one “how will I do this” detail. There are none.
The market needs to be allowed to work; that means NOT bailing out any of these investment banking houses who tried to hedge by socializing the risk. By the way, answer a few questions.
Who did sign the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which mandated loans to be made to, shall we say, people of questionable credit-worthiness?
Who’s advisors were the CEOs of Fannie Mae, etc during the period when that quasi-governmental institution ran wild?
Who is for bigger government and the higher taxes (as if we already don’t pay too much) and increased regulation and the consequent reduction in freedom?
Obama is an empty suit. To the extent he’s said anything in this campaign, it’s that he’s a socialist. This guy is extremely dangerous for the U.S. I’m holding my nose and voting for McCain.
Posted by: Smber | September 21, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Ummm…to Someonedidpredictthis…you can put a different shade of lipstick on a pig, and it’s still a pig. And still a Republican. You lost me at “make the Bush tax cuts permanent.”
I don’t disagree with everything else, but overall, I’m not impressed.
Posted by: Korry | September 21, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Well, Teri, that really explains it since it came from the New York Slimes — the Democrats’ propaganda machine. It must be getting pretty hard on them to keep having to protect Obama — but they sure like to trash Sarah.
Posted by: LynneG | September 21, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Nice lies and convoluted rhetoric Smber. You fail.
The Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac lobbyists are working on the McCain Campaign.
Posted by: Korry | September 21, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
“but they sure like to trash Sarah.”
Oh, come on. No one has to trash Sarah. She IS trash. People are just noticing.
Posted by: Korry | September 21, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
it a nutshell what obama is talking about is the basic premise of what is being proposed already-this was all discussed ALL DAY ON ALL NEWS CHANNELS-nothing original not one thought. what obama did was he waited until their was a general consensus as to where this thing was going and then just embellish on it like it was all his idea.
Posted by: colorado | September 21, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Teri, the NEW YORK TIMES could NOT tell the TRUTH if was standing directly in front of them.
Posted by: abcblogger | September 21, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Wow, LynneG, you’re just a plain old liar.
Posted by: Korry | September 21, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
“since when did that become a priority for the very Democrats who not only created this mess but profited by it and will continue to profit from it!”
That is just total BS. Democrats DID NOT create this mess. It started with Ronald Reagan.
As far as who profits from it, perhaps some Democrats have. But mostly it’s Neo Cons, I think.
Posted by: Korry | September 21, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
LynneG – I don’t know where you’re getting your information from, but it’s wrong! You’re exactly the kind of voter McCain and Palin are counting on. They are trying to confuse you with their lies – the more they say them, the more people will believe them. If you’re putting all your money on Palin – God help you. She became mayor of Wasila with zero debt and left it with millions of dollars in debt and oh by the way, she can see Russia from Alaska. What a farce! By the way, even though the Democrats have been in control since 2006 (you got you year wrong there), it’s obvious you don’t understand how Congress works. The Republicans are counting on this! In the Senate, Republicans have routinely filibustered every major piece of Democratic legislation. (They need 60 votes to end filibusters.) This was reinforced by over 119 veto threats by President Bush(who never issued a veto as the previous Republican congresses ran up record deficits). Majority rule has essentially been repealed. Then of course George Bush there are the times he has use his veto! The strategy hasn’t been a secret. Conservatives have openly gloated about it.
Posted by: Teri from Ohio | September 21, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Blackees in the Whitee House, oh my!
Posted by: chasemonster | September 21, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
ok let me see if i get this. what this article is doing is crediting obama for engaging in a BIPARTISAN approach by making phone calls- what a joke according to this story the bipartisan pols he contacted are all democrats.
NOT ONE REPUBLICAN.
schumer clinton emmanuel reid pelosi dodd-frank ect are all democrats so how is this bipartisan?
Posted by: colorado | September 21, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
a female vice president in the whitehouse who is married to an innuit indian oh my!
Posted by: colorado | September 21, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
abcblogger: McCain should look first to his campaign staffers as the cause of that debacle. One of them was Fannie Mae’s head of lobbying, and spread tens of millions of dollars around Washington in the form of lobbying contracts. A number of McCain staffers were on the receiving end of those contracts, collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars each from the lenders to rep their interests. And McCain’s campaign manager served as president of a lobbying association that fought to protect Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae from the sort of regulation that McCain is now proposing.And other current McCain campaign staffers were the lobbyists receiving shares of that money. According to the Senate Lobbying Database, the lobbying firm of Charlie Black, one of McCain’s top aides, made at least $820,000 working for Freddie Mac from 1999 to 2004. The McCain campaign’s vice-chair Wayne Berman and its congressional liaison John Green made $1.14 million working on behalf of Fannie Mae for lobbying firm Ogilvy Government Relations. Green made an additional $180,000 from Freddie Mac. Arther B. Culvahouse Jr., the VP vetter who helped John McCain select Sarah Palin, earned $80,000 from Fannie Mae in 2003 and 2004, while working for lobbying and law firm O’Melveny & Myers LLP. In addition, Politico reports that at least 20 McCain fundraisers have lobbied for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, pocketing at least $12.3 million over the last nine years. (THERE ARE MORE!)
Posted by: Teri from Ohio | September 21, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
golfgirlusa: “Nothing new here, where is this idea xeroxed from?? It’s like student’s thesis outline in school project, not deep.”
So, golfgirlusa, I’m guessing you feel McCain’s plan is much more detailed and deep? Would you care to share it with us?
Let’s see… fire the head of the SEC (or was that the FEC?), impose stronger regulations (even though he’d been for more and more deregulation until, oh, Monday). Am I missing anything? What else is in McCain’s extensive, substantive plan?
Posted by: cishart | September 21, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
Teri, Bill Clinton signed the legislation. Democrats are to blame.
Posted by: abcblogger | September 21, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
This is beyond hope. You Obambi supports are so blind it will only be resolved by blood in the streets. I relish the thought of whacking some RATS who have run this country down and supported treason in time of war. look at the facts, idiots. It was Clintoon who started this mess with the liberal agenda of giving to those undeserving. Read about the CRA fools.
See you in the streets no matter who wins. The purge is coming.
Posted by: Rober | September 21, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Obama will lose in November palin and simple.
Posted by: cccc | September 21, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
If you question the influence of Lobbyists, look no further than the Banks excuse that it was Congress push to get “minorities and poor people” mortgages. Certainly both parties are on the hook for Fannie & Freddie but it’s a dangerous stretch to include Wall St Investment Banks in this too-simple explanation to a complex problem…Stop and Think. Does anyone believe that Investment Banks had ANY altruistic motives as they developed increasingly slack underwriting?…Wall St is light years ahead of Fannie/Freddie in creativity and developing investment schemes that benefit their clients…By the way Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are in the DC area. They have always been quasi-gov’t investors…Lehman Brothers, Merrill, Morgan Stanley and Bear Stearns are/were WALL ST investment banks that accumulated mortgages as fast as they could. They bundled them and sold them as Bonds which were used to finance a variety of things,including billion$ mergers & acquisitions..As a former Lehman Brothers employee, I encourage people to look beyond the “trying to help minorities, got us into this” propaganda that’s being peddled by Banking lobby and taken up by the GOP and their minions…This mess is the result of Capitalism left unchecked…As a Capitalist, I don’t want Gov’t in the way…The unfortunate lesson here is that Capitalists CAN’T be allowed to police themselves…In fact, this proposition goes against the very risk-taking core of what makes capitalism great. Yes,Capitalism needs SMART oversight. Tying Fannie/Freddie to Wall Street is both false and divisive. For those who truly believe that “minorities and poor people” are the cause of this problem, consider whether that would be a message that Banking lobbyists would want you to believe.
Posted by: TruthHurts | September 21, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
abcblogger”Bill Clinton signed the legislation” You need to keep up with the blogging. I was answering LynnG who was blaming the “2004 congress” which she thought was Democratic – here’s her quote which again is factually wrong, (but who cares about the facts)! “And remember the Democrats have been in charge since 2004 and have planned this big crisis to happen right before the election.” How stupid is that – of course, the Republicans were in charge then!
Posted by: Teri from Ohio | September 21, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Obama presents a road map for recovering the economy; McCain generalizes and places blame on everyone else but his lobbyist advisers and his own Senatorial history. Obama shows solid judgment, the ability to pull together knowledgeable leaders to address these issues. McCain generalizes and places blame on everyone else but his lobbyist advisers and his own Senatorial history. McCain is so predictable!
Posted by: Lou R | September 21, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
stop blaming bill, its not his fault. Bush hasn let the economy down for the past 8 years, and now you want to blame Clinton because Bush squandered a record surplus.
Posted by: rachel | September 21, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
It’s the difference between McCain
style, who shoots right from the hip before he even thinks, and Obama who went on air immediately to reassure and calm down voters, then met with his cabinet of advisors and gave thoughtful consideration to the Bush adminsitartion response strategy and countered with a strong response, laying out what he insists must be included.
You guys have forgotten something – - the Bush administration is still in place. They’re empowered to act now, not the candidates. McCain’s little 6-point plan from Friday will never see the light of day….don’t you get it?
The Republicans here don’t really think McCain wrote the plan he read off the teleprompter last Friday, do they? What he said when the crises hit is the real “McCain on economics”….i.e. “the economy is fundamentally strong…oh, er…I really meant that American workers are strong…oh let’s have a commission to find out what went wrong”!!!
McCain was part of the Bush economic philosophy that got America into the mess, I doubt he can immediately come up with the magic bullet to get us out.
Posted by: Annemarie | September 21, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Soon as Obama and Michelle is in the white house, Obama will introduce the five year plan for all of us.
Posted by: Karl | September 21, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Am I Missing Something?
How is this a Bi-Partisan solution:
ABC’s Sunlen Miller reports: Since yesterday, Sen. Barack Obama has spoken on the phone with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd, Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Chuck Schumer, Rep. Ralph Emmanuel, former President Bill Clinton and Sen. Hillary Clinton about the economic situation and the plan for dealing with it.
Spokesperson Linda Douglass says that the conversations were about devising a “quick, bipartisan solution” to the economic crisis and they touched on the principles that Obama laid out in a speech in Charlotte, N.C., today.
He met with Democrats.
How is that bi-partisan?
This was a Political meeting to discuss
how Obama could take advantage of
the situation.
Meeting with Chris Dodd and
Barney Frank is appropriate since they were responsible for Congressional
Oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
and they Failed Miserably!
More of the Same doesn’t cut it!
McCain was right by pointing out the
problem in 2005!
The Dems, Obama include ignored him and they are responsible for this mess!
The McCain/Palin Landslide has
begun!
Posted by: reaganfan | September 21, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Most on here just yell support.
The meltdown goes back to 1977 with the community reinvestment act with Carter. Was then tweaked by Clinton, supercharged with easy cash from greenspan and supported by senate and congress for not creating leverage rules for non-banking entities.
Calling on Dodd, Pelosi, Frank et all who are knee deep in this crap, is ignorant to say the least.
Paulson/Bernake are not magic, but they are partisan, so it would make more sense to trust them than either the repub or dem cabal.
But you clowns need to understand what you are talking about before you scream, you look foolish to folks who understand.
T
Posted by: FinancialGuru | September 21, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Paulson/Bernake are not magic, but they are partisan, so it would make more sense to trust them than either the repub or dem cabal.
correction: NON partisan
Posted by: FinancialGuru | September 21, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Who reported this for ABC? Don’t they know that it’s not Ralph Emanuel, it’s Rahm? But, that’s ABC for you.
Go Obama!!
Posted by: Carolyn Grace | September 21, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
FinancialGuru thank you for this information. i knew that clinton had deregulated in terms of nafta but i had not connected the dots back to carter.
Posted by: colorado | September 21, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Lets look at what Obama’s spokesperson said..”quick, bipartisan solution”. Now look at who Obama talked to on the phone…not a single one of them is a Republican, how can that be bipartisan? Ok she used the word quick, well duh the meltdown was occuring all week and Obama waited till everyone had already met and resolved the primary panic.
Now lets look at what he says about Main street and Wall Street…They are they the same. Main street needs to pay their mortgages. Didn’t anyone ever watch Its a Wonderful Life? George Bailey says is very clear. DUH
Posted by: Stephen | September 21, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
colorado:
you are most welcome. It would be so much better if folks looked at the truth as opposed to purposely misinforming themselves and others.
Without truth, there is just ignorance.
Both parties are taking us straight to hell, the election is us just choosing how to get there.
Posted by: FinancialGuru | September 21, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
SARAH PALIN IS UPSET
SHE IS UPSET THAT OBAMA DIDN’T OUTLINE HIS PLAN BEFORE, SO THEY COULD STEAL IT AND CALL IT THEIR OWN JUST LIKE THEY DID WITH THE ‘CHANGE’ CAMPAIGN.
Posted by: GIGI | September 21, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
McCain should fire himself and
fold his failing presidential
campaign.
Let’s hear his concession speech
before the Market opens tomorrow
on Wall Street.
Posted by: anon | September 21, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
If Obama is so keen on getting the job done for the economy why not come back to Washington in lieu of talking to people on the phone. It might be helpful to see him in action with real politicians. Maybe if we are lucky he will jet into Washington and vote but I would not surprised if he did not vote.
Posted by: William | September 21, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Anon:
Impressive post…Do you have anymore words of wisdom??
Now I will be able to relax while I watch the asian markets open this evening.
Douche
Posted by: FinancialGuru | September 21, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
“Typical” NoBama….”empty suit, no substance!”
Posted by: Davis | September 21, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
I agree with the following post…well said!
This is very smart of Obama for waiting till he gets all the facts before making his informed decision.
McCain on the other hand jumped all over this issue on friday talking pointing fingers and saying he opposed a bailout only to come out the next day to reverse his position. After been a champion of deregulation for more than 26 years, McCain has made a 180 degree to support Obama`s call for more regulation.
These are the two different kinds of leadership styles we can chose from. One is all talk about experience while the other displays intelligence and good judgment.
Obama 08
Posted by: Rhonda | September 21, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Hey, for those who say Obama has no specific plan, read down to about 2/3 of the way in this speech Obama gave to Wall Street folks on March 27, 2008.
http://www.barackobama.com/2008/03/27/remarks_of_senator_barack_obam_54.php
Man if we had implemented his ideas then, things would be much better now.
Posted by: Beth in VA | September 21, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Obama has 2 of fannie and franny ceos as his advisors. He has taken second largest amount from them and they destroyed the companies not caring about the people just them selves. This is what Obama liiks up to he is so not ready. Judgement is bad and its all he has.McCain could get on it sooner cause he tried to avoid it couple years ago but Obama and Biden voted against it now here we are where he said we would be.People better do a little more looking and not just the protecting kind. open mind would be a good start
Posted by: Mox | September 21, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
What’s wrong with the economy?…Simple..two things…you CAN’T give out mortgages to people who can’t afford them no matter what the DEMS think. Second…GAS PRICES!!!…No drilling DEMS the problem AGAIN!
Posted by: Jack | September 21, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Obama judgement-Knuckledheaded he said of relationship with Rezko.
Bad judgement by sitting and putting his beautiful girls in front of hate filled pastor Wright. He had Father phlegar on his staff, with Wright . Has closed meetings says wants a transparent gov. Right. Makes fun of those that dont fall into his line.is a same old Chicago politician that lies and plays in mud.says he will change this , yes right.look at the people that endorse him,Ayers,Farrakhan,Wright,Black Panthers,Carter, Hammas, Kadaffhi,Political Muslims.Is this what he will draw on in White House. He used fraud and thugery to win caucus states to beat Hillary. She was on high road and ambushed by her own party. Thats why come Nov. He wont win .They are now checking new registrants and useing loads more poll watchers and workers. People now will be arrested and are being . Acorn is known now across the country.Obama has to call Hillary cause he took all her solutions and called them his even in Primary. He cannt cut it doesnt have ans. himself. Think before to late.This econmy crisis could have been avoided but he chose to vote against it coming.
Posted by: Mox | September 21, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
More words that Obama can’t deliver on!
He is a follower and not a leader. He has to ask the democrat party what he should say! obama is for party over country! :(
Also, Obama has been feeding at the trough of Freddie and Fannie and is just part of the problem! :(
But, Governor Palin drew a crowd of 60,000 in Lady Lake Florida while Obama drew a crowd of 20,000 where he was stumping!
Palin knows how to talk to people and has an intuitive gift of taking their pulse! :)
America needs Senator McCain and Sarah Palin to deliver the reforms they need! They have the experience and the proven record of doing just that!
McCain/Palin 08!
Posted by: aware2u | September 21, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
AP-Yahoo News poll that – No one will belileve Yahoo that are a joke.
Posted by: gl | September 21, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Obama is just doing a song and dance like all politicians do to try to look good. Experts on wall street have already said that Obama is clueless.
Posted by: fred | September 21, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Yes we can
but no we wont
Posted by: Mox | September 21, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Party first for Obama! Ah-ah-ah-ah – what should I say now he equivocates and the dems tell him! :(
More words that Obama can’t deliver on!
He is a follower and not a leader.
Also, Obama has been feeding at the trough of Freddie and Fannie and is just part of the problem! :(
But, Governor Palin drew a crowd of 60,000 in little Lady Lake, Florida while Obama drew a crowd of 20,000 where he was stumping!
:)
Palin knows how to talk to people and has an intuitive gift of taking their pulse! :)
Americans need Senator McCain and Sarah Palin to deliver the reforms they need! They have the experience and the proven record of doing just that!
McCain/Palin 08! Country first! :)
Posted by: aware2u | September 21, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
JA: it’s easy to yell and insult others. if you had actually read my posts here and elsewhere, you would have seen that i am against the bailouts. you would have also seen that i have written that we can’t afford our current level of spending, let alone this nonsense.
so instead of swinging your arms wildly at everything and everyone, how about giving the benefit of the doubt…
Posted by: MIguy | September 21, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Obama wants to negotiate with terorists and rouge nations “withhout pre-condition. He stated that.
Read below what the IMC of Pakistan stated today:
“It is a direct hit on the integrity of Pakistan,” Rehman Malik, the Interior Ministry chief, told ABC News in an interview late on Sunday. “We have become hostage in the hands of these terrorists.”
al Qaeda, the Taliban and allied groups had been warning they would attack Pakistan’s cities. Malik said that “all roads point to South Waziristan,” the volatile tribal district along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border where senior al Qaeda leaders are believed to be hiding. Malik said the explosives included “military-grade” RDX and ammonium powder.
I say we blow them up and take names. The hiipy party wants to takl. How nice….
Posted by: Bart | September 21, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
I think there are two things that need to be said. First, Obama’s plan was developed as something to solve the problem and as something that in principle could be bi-partisan. T”hose saying he talked only to Democrats before tabling the plan are idiots. I suppose he should have spent another week trying to get the attention of the Republicans and get them agreed?
Second, he got the wide input as that is how you deal with this kind of crisis. It would be a mistake to come out with one idea one day and another the next. This is not a crisis that will be solved in a week. Nor does it deserve a solution that is made up in an hour on gut feel. I suppose that McCain just made up what he said off the top of his head. That’s why he has changed it three times already and is incoherent on the issue.
I suppose that a point made above worht mentioning is that Obama would be a fool to come out first with what he thinks should be done just to be first. Its better to be right. The time for him is available to do that. And, if he managed to have this together earlier, better let McCain impale himself on his own whiplash strategy, than to give him your own well thought out and good plan to copy.
It is so clear who is the better leader here.
Posted by: PaulStewart9 | September 21, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
But, Governor Palin drew a crowd of 60,000 in Lady Lake Florida while Obama drew a crowd of 20,000 where he was stumping!
Do you right wing nuts every do fact check. Just this week it was proving that Palin crowds have been lies. Also, I watch it today and there was not on 60,000. Why you nuts keep repeated lies over lies. They only reported that becasue Obama on any given day gets a crown over 20,000 and now they want to said Palin get 40,000 more. YOu right wing nuts will all your lies is the reason the USA is in just a bad shape. Bush Administration lie to the Congress, the Senate, House of Representive, and the American people regarding Iraq and now the troops are fighting a war becasue of all the lies the Bush Administration told. Why would any American people believe any think that come up of Palin mouth when she is refuseing to talk to investator regard claims of power of abuse. 60,000 yet, I like to see that one on paper not by her word. I take her word with a grand of salt. Palin is a bigger joke than McShame. You sound like a fool repeating any think Palin or McShame say 60,000 they wish.
Posted by: gl | September 21, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
Spokesperson Linda Douglass says that the conversations were about devising a “quick, bipartisan solution”
Obama meets with all Democrats but his spokesperson says he wants bipartisan solution. RIGHT
Posted by: Waggdogg | September 21, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
rhonda obama did not wait for the facts to make an informed statement. he waited until the consensus was made as to the direction to take for the bailout playing it safe and then he supported it and is starting to claim it as his own. he waited to see what direction the political wind was blowing. no integrity.
as always obama supports what is in his best interest. and other peoples ideas and words this guy is still voting present. nothing new or innovative. undecided purple person
Posted by: colorado | September 21, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
WOW, some of these comments are astounding. Despite what you may think after reading my post, i want to first say that I am not an advocate for either candidate. Having said that….
JA:
“Obama says we should focus on getting our investment back… what he is making American taxpayers buy is JUNK. WORTHLESS.”
how do you figure? have you realized that Obama is not “MAKING” you buy anything? You DO realize there is a government in place that is proposing these purchases and these are not his plans? It seems to me like he is simply proposing the conditions under which this bailout should be considered.
JA again:
“taxpayer’s investment” – give me a break. YOu mean a FORCED “INVESTMENT” of JUNK DERIVATIVE PRODUCTS???”
which begs the question: forced by whom? certainly not Obama. So why beat up the guy who is trying to protect the interests of the taxpayers (and their ‘forced investment’ (which, once again, he is not causing)?
JA again:
“YOu people are fools. How can Barack Obama now protect homeowners from foreclosure??? Don’t you people have minds??? If we give nearly 1 Trillion to bail out Wall St, do you think we have enough for homeowners, another 1 Trillion????”
Again, have to point out: Obama not head of CURRENT administration. So technically, he is not yet in a position to make the decisions that protect homeowners. He is in a position to negotiate on their behalf. So say, he might be negotiating to have half of that trillion go to homeowners and half of it go to wall street. The point is that he is talking about making homeowners become part of the deal (a deal that is not his doing, btw).
JH (and this was the most interesting):
“Obama was too slow to come out and reassure the American people.”
But you mean he DID eventually come out and reassured voters. Now, considering that Obama is not yet your President, its VERY interesting that you looked to him and not anyone else for reassurance (which you seem to imply he was able to deliver). Again very interesting that the burden of reassurance fell on his shoulders and he managed to deliver. I wonder: Where are John McCain and George Bush and what are they saying about the conditions under which this bailout should take place? Or is this an unconditional bailout in their eyes?
just saying: dont be so hateful when your own futures are at stake
Posted by: Questions | September 21, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Mox – Instead of spending all your time on website how about watching some fact check you right wing nuts seem to not wacth because you right wing nuts continue to point out all the lies McShame and Palin have been saying about Obama and the fact check repeated time after time that the McShame camp is right out lying. So, it would be wise, which I am aware you right wing nuts are not so wise, need to do some fact check before commmenting a what McSane and Palin say about Obama. That is what fact check is there for, but i guest you right wing nuts do really want to hear the truth so you continue to repeat all the lies coming for Mcsane mouth to try to get those native American people to believe the lies. We all know that you right wing nuts believe if you repeat a lie over and over the American people will start believe it. You right wing nuts lies have got up to you and now the American people don’t believe any think that come up your mouths.
Posted by: gl | September 21, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
I am Impressed
I will vote for him!
Posted by: GHM | September 21, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
G:
your are officially a douche as well
Posted by: FinancialGuru | September 21, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
gl regarding your post let us not forget that the do nothing democrat congress/senate voted in lockstep with bush. furthermore obama voted along with hillary and democrats to keep funding the war. so please.
when pelosi got elected along with a democrat majority we all rejoiced and expected CHANGE-what happened she took impeachment off the table as the first order of business and was as useless as a wart along with all the democrats.
undecided purple person
Posted by: colorado | September 21, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
Don’t feed the McCain trolls all.
We know what we have to do. Stay focused.
Heads down. Eyes on the prize. Let’s take this thing to the finish line.
5 weeks to go.
Go Obama/Biden/We the People 08
Posted by: dotheresearch | September 21, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Obama is as always reading scripted material. That is why he never says or acts on anything with out taking days to handle things, he has to gather what to do and say from others.
Because he has no clue on what to do or not, and has his team and checks in with Pelosi and Reid on what to do, then comes out and makes a statement.
That shows He can not make decisions on his on. Under pressure He could not make decisions in a timely manner.
If he gets a call at 3am today, he will have to wait until Thursday to make a decision on what to do.
Obama wants to Nationalize, Globalize and Socialize this country.
It is time people stopped drinking the koolaid and used common sense and reality to think on their own with. Other wise you will be living in a country just like the middle East Countries if Obama has any say in the matter.
Posted by: Seah | September 21, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
After 7+ years of a shoot-from-the-hip-speak- before-you-think administration I appreciate someone who gathers the facts and gives careful consideration to the situation before weighing in on the problem.
McCain spoke immediately, stumbled repeatedly over his own (or someone’s) ideas and looked like an incompetent fool. And Palin thinks it needs a little “shakin’ and fixin’.” Bring in a third member of the comedy team and we’ll have the Three Stooges.
Can’t wait to see Tucker explain this!
Posted by: anitanevada | September 21, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
SOME PEOPLE ARE TOO DUMB TO BE CALLED DUMB..
For the 2-10% of the population who cannot vote for some one just because of skin color, I say too bad. We the people will not be deceived again. No way Mccain ,No way Palin. This is insane….21st century and we still have a sizable number of Americans who will rather die in their rot rather than vote for a black man to be president. Woe to you whoever you all are and whatever names you are called…but you will not determine our future in this country. Go Obama/Biden.
Posted by: dave | September 21, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm
The greatest danger facing America as a democracy is not our corrupt self-serving politicians or the threat from Russia, Iran, China, and North Korea to name a few. Rather, it is the threat from uninformed, brain-washed and perpetually ignorant American citizens that choose to vote along party lines, gender, race, or religion even when knowing fully well that the future our nation is at stake. These people are the real threat to America and our democracy.
I believe our founding fathers never saw this potential threat, and thus it would have probably served this nation better if there was some kind of IQ test requirement for voting in presidential election in America.
Posted by: KC | September 22, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Midwestmom (“This is no specifics, Obama has no plan. How can we expect him to lead?”) is another example of “you can put anything (lipstick included) on a pig, but it is still a pig.” All lipstick and no brain.
Posted by: Joe Hanes III | September 22, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Seah,
Many respected, serious and objective sources agree that the very plan being put forward by the government is the biggest nationalization and socialization proposal in global history. And you think Obama came up with this? THE GOVERNMENT PLAN IS TO NATIONALIZE THE DEBT! Make the taxpayers liable! So we all can pay for it for the next 35 years!
Can you seriously so misunderstand what is going on?
Obama simply wants to ensure that you, your family and all ordinary Americans are not going to be mugged by Wall Street and the Republicans. You are being mugged NOW by Paulson! How can you not see this?
If in the next 48 hours Obama does not succeed in modifying the Paulson/Bush plan to socialize debt, all Americans will be handing over a huge proportion of their income to Wall Street gamblers for years to come. It’s that simple.
Posted by: Louise | September 22, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
The above plan and 60 Minutes tonight!
And all the ‘coconut desert’ has is a surge that owes more to ethnic cleansing, and a wish to make a preemptive strike on Iran.
James Fallows wrote in the Atlantic Monthly “On June 7 (2001) President George W. Bush celebrated his first big legislative victory. Only two weeks earlier his new administration had suffered a terrible political blow, when a Republican senator left the party and gave Democrats a one-vote majority in the Senate. But the administration was nevertheless able to persuade a dozen Democratic senators to vote its way and authorize a tax cut that would decrease federal tax revenues by some $1.35 trillion between then and 2010…But here is what really mattered about that June day in 2001: from that point on the U.S. government had less money to work with than it had under the previous eight presidents. Through four decades and through administrations as diverse as Lyndon Johnson’s and Ronald Reagan’s, federal tax revenue had stayed within a fairly narrow band. The tax cuts of 2001 pushed it out of that safety zone, reducing it to its lowest level as a share of the economy in the modern era.”
Nancy, don’t sell us out or wimp out like you usually do. John McCain and the Republicans are the reason our country is in debt to China and Rurope.
Posted by: kravitz | September 22, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
JH said: “Obama was too slow to come out and reassure the American people. He hid behind his stump speeches with empty rhetoric. And now, after every expert and pundit and advisor has offered opinions and advice, Obama has something to say. The phone rang at 3 am and Obama did not answer!!”
__________
Boy, you truly must be an idiot. The whole point is that Obama took the time to get his facts straight, spoke to advisors and got it right, while all McCain did was flip out and insist on firing someone who can’t be fired by the president, then ask the wrong chairman to resign and then try to blame Obama for everything that’s wrong with the system.
Well, which is it? Does Obama not have the experience or is he so experienced that the deregulation that McCain has championed and devised by his ecomonic advisor Phil Gramm is Obama’s fault?!
Get your head out of the sand and think logically for once, for the love of Pete!
Posted by: Broadway Carl | September 22, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
It’s Hillary’s plan. She gave that speech (it’s on video)and everything BO is using is hers. Again.
Posted by: CyberFerret52 | September 22, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
what can a racist do for this country?
What can a terrorist link do for this country
OBAMA = ZERO
Posted by: donna | September 22, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
Partisanship will destroy us in the end. Logic and reason take second fiddle to team loyalty and winning. There is no honor in this country anymore.
Posted by: Chachi | September 22, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
Of course, Obama waited to put out his plan until he decided what points of the McCain Plan to plagiarize as his own.
Typical of his performance against Hillary Clinton in the primary, so no one should really be surprised.
And, as with most Obama economic gibberish, his “plan” offers no specifics, only a broad “pie in the sky” approach designed for his trademark flip-flops when needed.
George W. Bush could not have done any better.
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 22, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
I find it interesting that some here praise Obama, some criticize Obama, some criticize McCain, but NOBODY can bring themselves to praise what McCain did. I challenge anybody to express their honest support for McCain’s big ideas, which were to fire Cox (and then later back off from this statement) and to have a “commission”.
Posted by: student | September 22, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
Obama is NOT experienced enough, NOT knowledgeable enough, and he has NOT sacrificed anything in life for this country. All Obama knows is to repeat what others have said or what others want to hear. Because he has NO independent knowledge about how to address urgent and more serious crisis confronting America, that is why he could NOT at least make any sound suggestions when the recent major financial situation came about on Wall Street. All Obama does is to blame other people who have at least tried to do something for their country. I totally agree with Ms. Palin that Obama is NOT the leader for America. I am a black man who would like to be very objective especially when it comes to the issue about the leadership of our great nation. This is NOT race issue. It is about who is the more qualified and well-experienced candidate to lead America especially in the face of major crisis. And McCain has shown wisdom and leadership most of the time and also he is the candidate who have actually served this country and who has also sacrificed a lot in his life for this nation and he deserves the highest office of the land regardless of his race. To be objective, Obama does NOT deserve to be Commander-in-Chief of the US Army.
Posted by: Jimmy K | September 22, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am
Regardless of what McCain or Obama propose today, conditions are so fluid that either will have to craft most of his solution after inauguration. The question is, whose judgment looks the best? Obama certainly appears to understand these issues a lot better and consult with experts, not lobbyists for the very firms that have just finished bilking the taxpayer.
One thing to keep in mind is the likelihood that any 700 billion ‘bailout’ includes many billions in rewards for crooks, and lets other crooks escape their responsibilities to investors, policy-holders, and account holders while they waltz on over to the Caymans or Cyprus or some other offshore bank to keep their own loot safe from public scrutiny. Just like Enron, just like the Savings and Loan scandal of the ’80′s.
Posted by: stan | September 22, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am
As for the comment that Obama has never sacrificed anything for his country, sorry can’t let that pass. When you’re president of the Harvard Law Review, you can pretty much get any legal job you want after law school, and if you want that can be a short road to millions. Instead, Obama chose community service. That’s a huge financial sacrifice! If serving your community at great personal sacrifice isn’t patriotic, then nothing is.
Posted by: stan | September 22, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am
Guys,
I generally believe in the Republicans but will vote for the Democrats this November:
I base it on the following facts:
1.)Clinton(a democrat) did a good job despite his sexual foibles. No one can complain that under his watch the American economy was running well with the government in a budget surplus with no overseas war to speak off. He actually cleaned up the economy as well after George(father)Bush mess after the first gulf war.
2.) George W.Bush entered into a war without getting his facts straight and misled the American Public into believing Al Qaeda and Saddam were one and the same. The American public,traumatized and reeling from 9/11
took him at his word. The war is still bleeding the economy dry with no end in sight.
3.) The Republican congress at the time as well as the incumbent Republican President sat on their hands letting the housing bubble reach its maximum size before finally bursting.This is all in the name of “deregulation”. The greed is good mantra was as false and untrue as the two bit salesman of old.
We the taxpayers end up footing the bill.
McCain cannot really run away from these facts nor his own Republican party.
Obama may be inexperienced but so was Clinton in his first term. Democrats did solve a lot of the nation’s domestic problems during the Clinton administration.
Simply put, Republicans will lose this election come November because they deserved to lose.
INMHO,
Michael
Posted by: Michael Que | September 22, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am
McCain the FUNDAMENTALIST is a loser
Posted by: gooessss | September 22, 2008, 5:21 am 5:21 am
Secretary of Treasury Paulson’s unbelievably poor ‘plan’ for digging us out of this disaster:
1) Have the taxpayers over-pay $700 BILLION for worthless assets, while those responsible walk away with no consequence.
2) Make these give-aways absolutely, irrevocably un-reviewable. In essence, give this disaster of an administration a blank check with our name at the bottom, theirs at the top.
3) Use the bludgeon of ‘total financial meltdown’ to bash through whatever this administration thinks it can get away with. Once again.
What a surprise to see real leadership stiffen in the spines of Democrats, to actually see Pelosi and Reed start to stand up to these shysters. And what a great thing to see Mr. Obama step into the mantle of a leader, when this Country most needs one.
Posted by: Jason | September 22, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
Scare Politics: Factcheck Reveals Obama’s Social Security Whopper
“He tells Social Security recipients their money would now be in the stock market under McCain’s plan. False.”
“All current retirees would be covered by exactly the same Social Security benefits they are now under what the Obama campaign likes to call the “Bush-McCain privatization plan,” which Bush pushed for unsuccessfully in 2005.”
Posted by: LightSeeker | September 22, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am
It continues to amaze me that people dont get facts before they speak.Obama has no plan he is still finger pointing whats wrong after it is too late McCain tried twice to blow the whistle on fannie and freddie.It was shot down in the name of the democrats ! their excuse was it was targeted at low income families and would hurt their abbility to afford the american dream.
Posted by: reddog0216 | September 22, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am
I see that Obama called and spoke with all of the people who were responsible for pressuring lending institutions to forego sound lending practices that started this whole mess. GOOD LEADERSHIP! GO TO THE PEOPLE WHO STARTED THIS MESS AND ASK THEM TO CREATE AN EVEN BIGGER MESS.
Posted by: ubu2008 | September 22, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am
Biden’s Average Annual Charitable-Gift Total: $369
Sen. Joe Biden and his wife, Jill, have given an average of $369 per year to charities during the past decade, according to tax returns posted today to Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign Web site.
Senator Biden, the Democratic nominee for vice president, claimed $995 in charitable gifts in 2007 on the joint return with his wife. That figure is 0.3 percent of the couple’s claimed income of nearly $320,000.
The 2007 contributions were significantly higher than the couple’s gifts in previous years, which ranged from $120 to $380.
By comparison, Sen. John McCain, the Republican Presidential nominee, in 2007 reported $405,409 in total income and contributed $105,467, or 26 percent of his total income, to charity.
Sen. McCain files a separate return from his wife, Cindy. The totals do not include Ms. McCain’s income or charitable contributions.
Sen. Obama, and his wife, Michelle, donated $240,000 in 2007, or about 5.7 percent of the couple’s $4.2-million in reported income.
Mr. Biden has been rated as the least wealthy U.S. Senator.
Tell me who cares about the people????????????????????
Posted by: reddog0216 | September 22, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
For all of the folks on here whining about specifics I submit the following: Without Googling, please outline the specifics of the Paulson plan and explain in detail why you support. Please support your position with prior examples of macroeconomic management by either a state government or a national government. Please also fully cite any sources and include only published data.
Bottom line: You wouldnt know what to do with a “specific” if it was laid out for you by USAToday. My challenge above is what a freshman economics student would be expected to provide. But you’d know that if you went to college.
Posted by: Mike | September 22, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
For all who want to listen:
Obama gave a eceonomic speech back in March and he was calling for these very same points and deregulation before it became popular. If you read his blue print for change, these very points (in greater detail) were listed.
No one wants to listen. They only want soundbites. Obama has been saying the same thing the whole 2 years he’s been campaigning. McCain has been waffling and Obama as had a steady hand since he began. I think I want the more stable person in office.
Posted by: veronica, Atlanta, GA. | September 22, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
The real Obama at
http://townhall.com/Columnists/KevinMcCullough/2006/07/23/bamboozled_obamas_big_black_lie
Posted by: Judge | September 22, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
The ABC News Panel must fear the dark more than McCain and Palin. Here is something scary from the dark for the ABC News Panel to fear.
http://townhall.com/Columnists/KevinMcCullough/2006/07/23/bamboozled_obamas_big_black_lie
Posted by: Judge | September 22, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
We Americans must stand together in this time of great need for the United States of American. We must come to realize that Obama is nothing more than an egotistical harmful person to America is. Taxing the rich and business is a smoke screen used by Obama to tax all Americans with hidden taxes. Obama will be a puppet to his campaign contributors at the cost of taxing all Americans. There is no free ride.
Private interest groups and tax hungry government officials feared seventy-three old President Reagan as a governor of California and later as President of America. Why? They all knew that President Reagan was his own man. John McCain is his own man. The man is John McCain.
Sarah Palin is her own woman. Many are making disgusting comments about Sarah Palin out of fear and envy. The catty women would love to have the opportunity presented to Sarah Palin, but they know in their own hearts it will never happen.
News commentators pick at everything about Sarah Palin because she has what they cannot tolerate in a woman. Sarah has the intellect to be a mayor, a governor, a vice-president and a president of our great nation. Some men fear that Sarah Palin could rise to the highest office and be President of the United States of America. Obama does not have executive experience. Sarah Palin has executive experience.
The ABC News Panel says that it fears John McCain. These weak men fear John McCain and Sarah Palin. These weaklings have forgotten the powers of congress to control a president. The ABC News Panel’s true fears are that a woman may become the President of the United States of America. It does not matter who she is or what her qualifications are they fear a woman. These weaklings of men live in fear that a woman will receive the powers of the President of the United States of America. What boyish sissies the ABC News Panel is.
Any woman that does not vote for Sarah Palin votes against herself. Women must band together and know that a vote for Sarah Palin is a vote for you.
News commentators and writers want you to believe Sarah Palin is not the person for Vice-President. There is fear in their words that Sarah Palin will become the next president of the United States of American. There are men that cannot tolerate the thought of women in high responsible positions. The fear is not on Sarah Palin’s true qualifications, but based only on that she is a woman.
John McCain does not fear women. Obama has less women working in his office. John McCain has more women workers on staff. Obama women workers earn much less than then the men on his staff do. John McCain women workers earn more than the men on his staff do.
I can sense the fear that a woman could actually become president of the United States of America. I am like John McCain and it does not matter to me the sex of the person. As vice-president or president, Sarah Palin can do it for American.
It better to back a woman and not the little no nothing boys that runs against her.
For those Obama voters click here:
http://townhall.com/Columnists/KevinMcCullough/2006/07/23/bamboozled_obamas_big_black_lie
McCain is the man. The man is McCain.
Posted by: Judge | September 22, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Obama Where’s the beef….Just same old talking points..Give specifics…Something that the voter can wrap their minds around..Who…What…When…How…Inexperienced showing through…He has no idea what to do so he contacts the very people who help put us in this situation for advice…SO WHAT WILL HE DO IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY WHEN SPLIT SECOND DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE..NOW..GET BACK TO US IN A WEEK AFTER HE HAS CONTACTED HIS ADVISERS…I JUST DON’T TRUST HIS ABILITY TO THINK ON HIS FEET..HE’S A PLAN MAN, A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER, A LEGISLATOR, A LAWYER..HE’S CARTER ALL OVER AGAIN
Posted by: checks and balances | September 22, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Obama has ZERO experience to be President. He has a college degree, has worked in the community, which millions of Americans are doing, and he has voted present in the senate.
In addition, he is not what he says he is. Obama’s father figure mentor was Frank Marshall Davis, leader of the Communist Group USA, which makes him very dangerous for our country. See link:
http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor/
Plus, we do not want our country to be controlled by Pelosi, Reid, Obama, and Biden. No thanks to socialism!! No thanks to higher taxes!! No thanks to more government agencies!! No thanks to a failed Congress!!
Posted by: Louis | September 22, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Wow, I am impressed with Oabama. he is starting to show as a real leader and not your typical, average lying sack politician (ie. McBush).
Lisa
http://www.FireMe.To/udi
Posted by: Lisa JAmeas | September 22, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Louis: “Obama has ZERO experience to be President. He has a college degree, has worked in the community, which millions of Americans are doing, and he has voted present in the senate.”
A college degree from Harvard that he earned on merit not from a silver spoon ride.
Work in community when he could have been getting rich on Wall Street.
And 4000+ votes in the senate, of which about 130 were present. Many of these votes were at the advice of his party leadership as a political strategy – if Dems voted present, then Republicans were given cover to also vote present and deprive a nice sounding but fundamentally flawed law passage. McCain never votes present, he simply does not show up to vote at all. You can decide which is the more admirable approach.
Starting from his election date, McCain has missed far more votes in the federal senate – including meaty ones on issues like renewable energy – than Obama.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 22, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
A real plan would be to abolish the federal reserve.
Posted by: Dane Collins | September 22, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Liberals are nothing but ANGRY morons
Posted by: give this elephant a break | September 22, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“Sarah Palin is her own woman.”
——
Judge, why don’t you stop just regurgitating right-wing talking points and pay attention. “Strong” personalities aren’t what make for good governance. And honestly if you’re going to start citing Reagan as an economic leader, you’ve already got your head too far up your ass to make any fair analysis of the current crisis.
Posted by: wes | September 22, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
When are you Dems going to get it? We don’t care about facts or plans or anything else. We wouldn’t remmeber the specifics if you tatooed them on our forheads backwards so we saw them in the mirror every morning. We’re just to scared to elect a non 100% white man who might take our money and give it to causes without concrete motives like greed or fear.
Posted by: McChickens | September 22, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Liberals are nothing but so-called morons.
Posted by: liberals smell | September 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Playoffs, dont talk about playoffs! Plan, what plan?..
This is a wish list. Obama could’nt be anything more then a fluffer in a porn movie, except that he can’t make any “hard” decisions. This is nothing more then affirmation for the moronic obamacites to stay on board….
http://www.deathbydemocraticparty.com
Posted by: deathbydemocraticparty | September 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Playoffs, dont talk about playoffs! Plan, what plan?..
This is a wish list. Obama could’nt be anything more then a fluffer in a porn movie, except that he can’t make any “hard” decisions. This is nothing more then affirmation for the moronic obamacites to stay on board….
http://www.deathbydemocraticparty.com
Posted by: deathbydemocraticparty | September 22, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Liberals are nothing but ANGRY morons… so what are Conservatives?.. a bunch of buck-tooth looking, over-all wearing, bible loving, moose hunting, hillbillies?
Posted by: McBush | September 22, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
McBush…original. Stupid, but original
Posted by: deathbydemocraticparty | September 22, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
WOW, BIG SURPRISE NOBAMA HAS NO IDEAS.
PALIN 08
Posted by: DEB | September 22, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
DEB, you must be illiterate. Please scroll up and read.
Posted by: deathbydemocraticparty | September 22, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
This is to all who call themselves Democrats. Were are you at? Why did you let the liberal morons take over your party. Liberals are nothing but liars, so that means they lied to you too. Look what they did to Hillary, and they call themselves the people of change and then attack minorities themselves, then call people racist if they don’t vote for Obama. People, please wake up, liberals have no morals! That is why they hide behind the face’s of minorities and think they can call themselves Christians, what HYPOCRITES. Obama is a racist, Obama lies, Obama is sexist, and anyone who votes for him are morons who love being lied to.
Posted by: Liberals are Idiots | September 22, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
How can the Repubs not see that they’re beloved Bush and McBush are the reason to why this economy went down the toilet? I just can’t understand their logic. Are you people that deaf, dumb, and blind or you’re just born retarded? It cease to amaze me that they’re willing to give McBush/Plain another crack at flushing this economy down the stink hole again. The European are right, American are dumb.
http://www.deathbydemocraticparty.com
Posted by: deathbydemocraticparty | September 22, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Any a-holes that says the next thing about Obama having no plans, where’s yours? Post them up and I’ll be the judge of it.
Posted by: deathbydemocraticparty | September 22, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Mcbush, liberals are nothing but tree hugging, government hand outs, g-string wearing, queers, lesbians, angry cry babies, with a big twist of stupidity
Posted by: Liberals are Idiots | September 22, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Mcbush, you really are a moron, this is a fact too. The majority of what people hillbillies vote democrat, LOL.
Posted by: Liberals are Idiots | September 22, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
Death by Dem, here’s the plan: The fat cats got us into this mess and we’re afraid that they’ll have to get us out. We think we can speak for all of our rubber-backboned Republican friends when we say our plan is to vote back in the good ol’ boys and then grab our ankles for another four years. We’re too scared to do anything else! Palin/McCain!
Posted by: McChickens | September 22, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Name calling and insults are the last resort for the ignorant…go back and check who is doing all the insulting, and you’ll catch on…
Posted by: whits | September 22, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Libs are Idiots: Don’t be so hard on the poor guys. They just don’t have the good sense to take off their blinders and be frightened of everything like we are. Besides they might get mad at us and go out and vote…
Posted by: McChickens | September 22, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Let the banks that are having the problems fail. Then they will get sold to companies who might have a chance of getting them back on their feet by people who know how to handle money.
Cause clearly the people that are doing it now aren’t doing a good job. And We all know how the govenment handles money, So they should just stop, look and learn.
I would really hate to live in a country that was just bought out by Foreign interest because our Gov’t goes backrupt itself.
It would clearly suck to instantly become Communist because China Buys out the US.
I wouldn’t put faith into either side politically right now until they grow up and act like adults. This elementary style of government and political bashing is stupid.
I believe in a gov’t for the people by the people. Not the gov’t that doesn’t take the consideration of what the people really want. Reactive politics ends up screwing everyone.
Grum
Posted by: Grum | September 22, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
JA:
“Black Grinch”…..? Are you serious? I don’t think you got the memo, but being a racist went out of fashion in the 60′s.
Whits:
Yes, you are afraid. And angry. The GOP is full of scared, angry, old white men with outdated ideas and belligerent demeanors. You are ordinary Americans willing to be taxed to death for nothing in return, and have your jobs stripped away, and yet your fear and anger, misdirected as faux-patriotism, drives you back to the Republican party.
You’re the type they prey upon. Misinformed, easy to manipulate citizens.
Your ilk are outdated. The GOP pool is like the customer base for R.J. Reynolds. All dying off, and very few joining in.
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross”.
- Sinclair Lewis
Posted by: Citizen | September 22, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
You Republicans are truly a sad bunch of idiots. You criticize Obama for coming out with this, while your halfwit canditate can’t get his facts or his position straight. All you do is bitch in the same Republican manner about whose fault it is! Give us all a break.
Forget blaming and lets all start working towards fixing this.
As far as McShame is concerned… and his token female VP – they should be utterly ashamed of themselves. McShame beleives he should be president because he was a POW? Palin pimping out her son in active duty?
That sort of behaviour sickens me. Nothing more than emotional blackmail.
On top of the fact they are both completely clueless. Hell I bet McShame is *still* saying that Palin never accepted any funding while running Alaska.
Don’t suppose any of you Repubs saw Palin (the most experienced person on Energy in the US – John McShame) being interviewed on that very subject? Get real people. No McShame/Palin.
Oh. And I’m a white guy. A white guy *not* voting for an aging old flipflopper and his alaskan floozie.
Obama/Biden 08
Posted by: john | September 22, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
LOL! The comments are better than the actual article.
Posted by: Denver | September 22, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
I would like another condition. I want to see some blood. I’ll sign off on giving the financial system $700 billion after I see some of the executives responsible for this mess put to death.
Posted by: Joe Ordinary | September 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
This is just too sad and pitiful. What is wrong with this country? These posts are all so full of vitriol and stupidity.
No one has a good answer for this problem. All answers are.. putting lipstick on pigs. We got to this point over the course of 15 years – with both major political parties contributing to the problem. They answer to big corporations and banks because they pay them the most money for access. Both parties do this.
Personally, I think Obama handled this issue much better than McCain. I don’t think spouting off at the mouth before you have enough information to know the story is very professional. I would have appreciated a more measured response from McCain.
And the whole Sarah Palin thing is just hilarious. Since the 50s the Republicans have been fighting against women’s rights and then they pop in artic barbie to spice up McCain. If more people knew she was an end-times believing Pentecostal, maybe they would think twice about putting her in charge of nukes. ( yeah right )
Posted by: scott fanetti | September 22, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
Of all the comments I read (slightly more than half was plenty), I am most encouraged by the sheer number of Obama supporters and most discouraged by Teri from Ohio, although midwestmom runs a close second. Teri sounds smart enough to know better — but obviously doesn’t!
Some people, even after the last eight years, just don’t get it. Whatever else you want to say about the Democrats, it wasn’t them who brought this country to where it is now. They didn’t do much to help in the past two years, but you have to understand by now that it was “unregulated Republicans” that have done this to us. And that is the real American tragedy! This year I’d vote for my cat to run the country before giving it back to the Republicans again. I was going to say I’d vote for the village idiot, but unfortunately, we’ve already tried that one!
Posted by: Will | September 22, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
I read this entire thread from top to bottom. It makes me sad. There are some really valid points being made here, but unfortunately, they are just swallowed up in a sea of cranky “Hey you kids, get off my lawn!” vitriol and propagandist troll-bait.
I know there are rational people out there. I’d like to meet some of you… I really would. In fact, regardless of where you stand politically, I’d like to buy you coffee just to hear you talk.
The way these threads seem to deteriorate to infantile squabbling (as opposed to actual issue debating), leads me to believe that the typical poster is unable to think rationally. If these comments are representative of average voters, it frightens me. I wouldn’t trust some of these posters to manage a Dunkin’ Doughnuts, let alone recognize what qualities make a capable leader.
I’m emmigrating to Sweden. Better schools, better health care, healthier overall economy. You all let me know when this whole “democracy” thing isn’t too challenging for you.
[*If have ever used the word "vitriol," this rant is not intended for you.*]
[*...and no offense to Dunkin' Doughnuts or its employees. Seriously, they're absolutely delicious. Emm, the doughnuts are, that is.*]
Posted by: CircusMaximus | September 22, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
It’s amazing at the amount of the pro-McCain comments. It’s obvious that these people don’t have the knowledge about McCain and the Keating Five; here’s a clue for the clueless, this isn’t McCain’s first financial crisis. McCain was a member of the Keating Five, who ultimately caused the Savings and Loan Scandal in the 80′s-90′s, the cost to clean up that mess was 3 Billion. McCain is the last person that needs to handle our money. Between these two de-regulators Phil Graham and McCain this country would be bankrupt more than it already is, if that’s possible.
This financial mess is the result of Republican policy actually being implemented. It’s De-Regulation at it’s finest. Lets not forget that the Republican’s has been in power for the last 8 years. McCain and Palin are running like the Dems were the ones who were in power. It’s amazing really. Black is now White and White is now Black. The Republicans are like kids at a birthday party, when the cake is gone all they want is more cake, and they scream and they cry until they get it; never mind where the cake comes from. Only this time the cake costs $700 Billion and they want it all to themselves. It’s sad really.
The founding fathers wouldn’t even recognize the country that we have become.
The facts are that McCain is going to lose on Nov. 4th, for one reason and one reason only; because people care about the issues. Because it’s these issues that are making them lose their houses, making them work harder for less pay, and making a impact in their lives. All they have to do is remember that the Republicans got them in this mess and the Democrats will bail them out once again.
Posted by: Jeff From Dallas, TX | September 22, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Jeff, why don’t you liberal fanatics stop hiding the facts about obama’s slum lord project scandal to see how he really treats people, and his Illinois senate record that shows him voting present 132 times, why did he do that? Stop getting your info from NBC and you will recover from your lack of intelligence.
Posted by: Liberals are Idiots | September 22, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
To ask where is his plan is idiotic- the plan came from the current administration and the Congress is in control of the purse strings. Obama is only stating what needs to be included in the plan- the plan will not be given a blank check and these principles need to be included. Don’t you think that talking with fellow members is the right thing to be doing? Don’t you think we need to not be hoodwinked like with the Iraq Plan? It will be stupid to give out 700 billion dollars and only have one person in control with no judicial oversight.
If you had been reading all of the news of the week you would find Obama has been in contact with the top economic advisors in the nation and who has McCain talked with? Thats right he was at his 50th class reunion and it was more important.
I am tired of hearing the same lies repeated- Raines, muslim, fannie mae and freddie mac (Truth- McCain has Rick Davis, Arthur Culvahouse Jr., and Mark Buse as advisors), ect. When your lies are debunked you should stop using them- except you are programmed to continue showing how stupid you are.
Spout hate and bs to show support for McCain! Woo hooo! I so smart to spout bs!
Posted by: Tired of bs | September 22, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
JH,
Right. I guess you think he should have just said he’d fire everybody. Even those he can’t fire. ha! Of course he weighed the opinions of his advisors. And… came up with a plan. Or, at least the beginnings of a plan. What a Presidential Thing to do. Unlike the guy who would just fire everybody. That… is a hothead.
Posted by: CW | September 22, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
VOTING PRESENT means he neither voted yea nor nay. It means he believed there needed to be MORE DISCUSSION on the matter. what is wrong with that?
Posted by: CW | September 22, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
When the assets from those companies are eventually sold to repay the government for this bailout, the money ought to go to paying down the national debt. We have ignored personal and government debt for too long, it its affects are starting to hurt bad.
Posted by: Tkael | September 22, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
LynnG, you are a very sad person. If you took the same amount of time you’ve spent posting on this board to go to factcheck.org and look up the facts about Obama, you’d realized that half of the crap you’re spewing — especially the Obama is Muslim nonsense — are complete lies fed to you by the Republican party.
I mean, if you honestly believe what you’re saying, I feel very sorry for you.
Posted by: JoeJones | September 22, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
CW, typical liberal. How can he agree with his colleagues and then vote present? He voted present so records would not show exactly how he thinks on taxes which is the exact same tax plan Illinois Governor won on, and it didn’t work other than higher taxes for everybody. Now, look at that state and see how everybody’s taxes went up, and how they have an even bigger deficit than before a Democratic Gov. and a Democratic controlled Congress came into power. That is the most ignorant thing i ever heard from a liberal! You must be a paid blogger? If he disagreed with his party, then why does he not have a record of standing against and speaking out against his own party? McCain has that record of standing against his party. This is all a cover-up, and you obamabots are confused. This is an attempted by the liberals which were the protesters in the 60′s and 70′s now in power trying to gain more. Explain his friendship with Ayers, which he admits to being friends with. You Obama supporters can throw all the so-called facts out you want, but reality speaks louder than ignorance.
Posted by: Liberals are Idiots | September 22, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
CW, so he needed 132+ times to figure something out in his politcal career, hhmmm! He is a power hungry liberal with no experience on even commensense jugdement. He may have big ears, but his balls are small.
Posted by: Liberals are Idiots | September 22, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Obama is meeting with Barney Franks etc. Barney Franks, Democratic Chairman of the Senate Finance Committee – among many other Democrats and republicans – is responsible for allowing Fannie Mae to grow, finance mortgages to people who could not pay them back, and for starting the whole mess. The problem is not regulation or deregulation but improper regulation. Obama never stood up against the democratic cronies, never has done a thing when there was need for responsibility and especially when there was a need to go against the party line (“let’s extend the mortgages to the poor” even if they can not afford them). How do you expect him to do anything in the future in the interest of the country if so far he only acted in the interest of his party and himself?
Posted by: exdemformccain | September 22, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
There’s nothing scarier than a power hungry liberal! We have no understanding of their motives! To any courage inhibited conservative if you aren’t in it for greed or fear it’s a complete unknown, which is absolutely terrifying!
Posted by: McChickens | September 22, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
You had tentatively won my vote already Obama, but today you have truly earned it. Here’s to hoping Virginia turns blue on election day.
Posted by: Vyson | September 22, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
Liberals are Idiots:
Thanks for my daily dose of Republican Talking Points. It’s refreshing to get a “fair and balanced” view of the world, I thank you for that.
See the beauty about McCain and Palin is that we liberals don’t have to lie about them, all we have to do is fact check them and point out their lies. As much as they are lying and getting caught; It’s almost as if they want to throw the election.
Now back to reality, if you done typing hyperbole and lies it would be nice to get back to the discussion about the issues.
Oh, that’s right republican’s don’t talk about the issues; you guys only talk about lies and hearsay and lipstick on a pig. By the way McCain’s lipstick shade needs to change, he’s had the same on for 24 hours. Isn’t it time for another flip-flop? Or a lie?
Posted by: Jeff From Dallas, TX | September 22, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
In a few weeks we will make a choice that will decide our future. I follow an economist named Bob Proctor. He has called the top and bottom of every market crash since the 70s correctly. Also, he perfectly predicted the current real estate market meltdown and the picture he paints about what will happen in the next couple years is terrifying.He thinks it will be worse then the great depression.
The banks in the U.S. are going under one after the other. Countrywide the largest morgage bank in the world,Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch which are 3 out of the top 5 wall street firms. Also, Fanny and Freddy Mae which hold 50 percent of the home loans in the United States. The government took them over because they are essentially bankrupt.If they didn’t the entire financially system would virtually shut down, the stock market would crash and we would suffer beyond what any of us have seen before.
McCain just like Bush ” doesn’t understand the economy”.
That not just my opinion its his own words. Not only does he not understand how to fix it but he does not understand exactly what is broken.
It is no surprise that he doesn’t. The people that make up these securities use complex mathematical models very few people understand.
Bush and McCain both can take the credit for this mess since they helped deregulate the laws that were protecting us.
Bush’s economic advisor Phil Graham wrote the deregulation bill that allowed banks to take huge risks with all of our future.
Now, Phil Graham is the head of McCain’s economic policy.He is also McCain’s choice for the next secretary of the treasury.
No one in this country can afford for that to happen. The last time Bush met with his economic advisors was in March. He either didn’t care or didn’t realize that anything was wrong. Phil Graham had the guts to say that we are in a mental recession after he helped create the worst economy meltdown in our lifetime.
It will take the best and brightest minds in the world to get us out of this nightmare. As bad as Bush has done, McCain would be
even more destructive because things are in much worse shape. The next president will not inherit a surplus like Bush did but a tanking economy and a 11,600,000,000,000 (trillion) dollars deficit. Most of it Bush created and it will take decades to pay it back.
If you do what you have always done then you will get what you have always got.
When it comes to policy Bush and McCain are the same 90 percent of the time.
So why are the polls even close then ?
The chairman of McCains campaign recently said that people don’t vote on issues they vote on a personality composite. Which means he is trying to sell you personality instead of results.
He believes people will vote against their own interests.
Let’s teach him we are smarter than that .
Hold them accountable NOW! while it will still help.
Elect Obama Biden 2008
Posted by: ObamaBidenNOW | September 22, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Common Sense: Good leaders are smart enough to gather information on subjects from a number of sources before making a decision. No one should be so arrogant as to think that they know all.
Obviously he called some people and gathered information and opinions. Does that mean that he merely parroted their suggestions back to the media? Possibly. More likely he took their advice and created his own plan derived from the suggestions and his own knowledge.
It sounds better than “700 billion dollars, please!”.
Posted by: Michael | September 22, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
Dear God, reading some of these comments makes me ashamed to be American…
Posted by: Chris | September 23, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Hey, Exdemformaccain, um, your talking points are showing again. After eight years of folks like you dismissing all criticism of the current regime, most of us have little respect for your assessment of what real leadership. Your attempt to lay the blame on people like Franks…as if THEY’VE been in charge for eight years, well, it’s just sad.
Posted by: BushKarma | September 23, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Hey, Exdemformaccain, um, your talking points are showing again. After eight years of folks like you dismissing all criticism of the current regime, most of us have little respect for your assessment of what real leadership is. Your attempt to lay the blame on people like Franks…as if THEY’VE been in charge for eight years, well, it’s just sad.
Posted by: BushKarma | September 23, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am
How did we get here?
That’s easy to answer. His name is Phil Gramm. A few days after the Supreme Court made George W. Bush president in 2000, Gramm stuck something called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act into the budget bill. Nobody knew that the Texas senator was slipping America a 262 page poison pill. The Gramm Guts America Act was designed to keep regulators from controlling new financial tools described as credit “swaps.” These are instruments like sub-prime mortgages bundled up and sold as securities. Under the Gramm law, neither the SEC nor the Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) were able to examine financial institutions like hedge funds or investment banks to guarantee they had the assets necessary to cover losses they were guaranteeing.
This isn’t small beer we are talking about here. The market for these fancy financial instruments they don’t expect us little people to understand is estimated at $60 trillion annually, which amounts to almost four times the entire US stock market.
And Senator Phil Gramm wanted it completely unregulated. So did Alan Greenspan, who supported the legislation and is now running around to the talk shows jabbering about the horror of it all. Before the highly paid lobbyists were done slinging their gold card guts about the halls of congress, every one from hedge funds to banks were playing with fire for fun and profit.
Gramm didn’t just make a fairy tale world for Wall Street, though. He included in his bill a provision that prevented the regulation of energy trading markets, which led us to the Enron collapse. There was no collapse of the house of Gramm, however, because his wife Wendy, who once headed up the Commodities Futures Trading Commission, took a job on the Enron board that provided almost $2 million to their household kitty. And why not? Wendy got a CFTC rule passed that kept the federal government from regulating energy futures contracts at Enron.
If John McCain gets elected and chooses Phil Gramm as his Treasury Secretary, which many politico types see as likely, they will be able to talk about the good old days when Gramm was in congress and McCain was in the senate and they were in the midst of the Savings and Loan crisis.
The S and L scandal, which may look precious when compared to our present cascade of problems, isn’t hard to understand, either. But it is impossible to take John McCain seriously on our current financial Armageddon since he was dabbling in the historic collapse of 747 S&Ls that occurred during Ronald Reagan’s era. In the early 80s under the Republican president, congress deregulated the savings and loan industry in much the same way that Gramm made sure there were no laws hindering our current financial malefactors on Wall Street. S&Ls simply lobbied until they had less regulation and then began making rampant, unsound investments.
Edited
Complete Article Here –> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-moore/a-nation-of-village-idiot_b_127340.html
Read It!!
Posted by: SEEK | September 23, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am
I thought that Obama said the controlled loan would be funded by a tax created on the high profit margins of american oil companies over a 5 year period?
Also, I wish Ron Paul had not been kicked out of the debates and cut off by the media giants. =( He was leading polls until then.
He seems like a very smart man and a majority of what he has said has happened, you have to give him credit. Plus, he doesn’t flip flop.
I hate how so many americans don’t even know what’s going on or just choose ignore it, like they’ll be immune to the effects of thier own actions.
Please need to get educated and be careful about what they beleive, this country was founded on lies and they continue today…It seems our nation is reaching the end of its’ reign and will slow to become a pit of dispair, arguments, and purhaps war.
Posted by: Jason | September 23, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
What we have here, folks, is trickle-down Communism.
Posted by: Jon | September 23, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Don’t vote for Dipstick (flip flopping) McCain & Lipstick (Loser) Palin.. These Dummies have no plans what so ever.. All they do is lie & BS! The voters who elected dim witted Bush in 2000 & 2004 are getting 8 years of what he created.. I didn’t vote for him either time yet i’m suffering in this aweful economy due to his lame judgment and poor leadership… McLame will only give you more nonsense. Obama can do a better job then either one of these IDIOTS!
No Plan McCain & Loser Palin will make your life worse than it is now..
OBAMA / BIDEN – THE ONES WE REALLY NEED
Posted by: dvine | September 23, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
It is so clear seeing this unfold from outside the US. If you elect the Republicans again, after the last 8 years, after they have destroyed your economy and your reputation and left your nation on the brink of demise, you are the dumbest group of people to have ever walked the earth.
Posted by: Amanda | September 24, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Funny, but I watched an interview today, and there Obama spoke to the contrary!
Maybe I do not understand? http://tubedirect.net/index.php?q=Obama-interview
This is all very suspicious ..
Posted by: dave | September 24, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Obama is a fraud. Chekc this out. His platform is all plagiarised
http://www.charlesrehn.com/charlesrehn/books/aconversationwithamerica/talkbacktoleaders/obamaandthedncplagiarism.htm/democratobamaplagiarism.htm
Posted by: BlueStarMan | September 26, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm