By Lee Speigel

Sep 9, 2008 6:10pm

Obama Says McCain Is Offering Fake Change: ‘You Can Put Lipstick on a Pig, But It’s Still a Pig’

LEBANON, Va. — "That’s not change," Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said of what Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is offering, laying out how McCain and President George W. Bush agree — in Obama’s view — on economic policy, foreign policy, health care policy, etc., etc.

"You know, you can put lipstick on a pig," Obama said, "but it’s still a pig."

The crowd rose and applauded, some of them later telling reporters* that they thought Obama had been alluding to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s ad lib during her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech last week, "What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick."

"You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called ‘change,’" Obama continued, "it’s still gonna stink after eight years.

"We’ve had enough of the same old thing! It’s time to bring about real change to Washington.  And that’s the choice you’ve got in this election."

Obama added that "it is not going to be easy … John McCain has a compelling biography, you know Sarah Palin is an interesting story."

The crowd booed.

"No, she’s new!" Obama said. "She hasn’t been on the scene, you know, she’s got five kids and my hat goes off to anybody who’s looking after five. I’ve got two and they tire Michelle and me out!"

–  Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

UPDATE: Obama senior adviser Robert Gibbs insists the senator was not referring to Palin or Palin’s comments. "That’s an old expression," Gibbs says.

* Note: this post has been updated. I originally wrote that the crowd "no doubt" made the connection, and then, after a bunch of us who were there in the gym talked to members of the audience, I changed this entry to reflect that they told us that they made the connection. Which is NOT the same thing, significantly, as them telling us that they thought Obama was calling Palin a pig — an interpretation NONE of us heard from members of the the audience, despite the false claim pushed by the McCain campaign.

User Comments

WOW..go get them!!!Keep that elbow sharp. They don’t think you got it in you!

Posted by: Lionel | September 9, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Holy crap! Did Obama really say that? That’s quite rude. I’m actually surprised.

Posted by: What? Really? | September 9, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I love it! :-)

Posted by: Julian | September 9, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

That sexist pig. Obama wishes he was half of what Palin is.
Obama NEVER!!!

Posted by: alex | September 9, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Poor Obama.

Posted by: a reader in georgia | September 9, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

Obama has completely lost his cool — this kind of language is so offensive to women who have favorable view of Palin.

Posted by: amy | September 9, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

So he’s sunk so low as to call McCain a dead fish and Palin a pig. What a baby. He’s just sore over the fact that McCain beat him at the political game by waiting to make his V.P. pick. Poor little Barack. I’ll be so glad when all of this is over and he goes back to being a JUNIOR senator.
MCCAIN/PALIN ’08!!!!

Posted by: Jen | September 9, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

What a JERK!!! He’s a PIG!!!!

Posted by: CC | September 9, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Yes, it’s still a pig.
And after that remark, I’m sure all of the people your comment was targeting will STILL be voting McCain/Palin.

Posted by: SandyB | September 9, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

So Joe…only a liberal woman on the ticket would be a step forward for women?
should have told that to Obama…
Biden just lost a few more women today.
Keep them coming Joe.

Posted by: riley | September 9, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

He is such a pig!

Posted by: Michele | September 9, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Yikes!
Big mistake.
Besides, Palin’s snatching up of the hope-change mantle is Obama’s fault.
He dropped the hope-change mantle when–dispite an overwhelming delegate lead in the primary, he decided to abandon his original message to crawl into the mud with HRC. Then, analogous to a turnover in the NFL, Palin snatched that mantle up.
The next Thursday and Friday—when the wall to wall exclusive ABC Palin coverage begins will show that Plain is authentic.
I can only hope that Obama calling Palin a “Pig” was on video tape.
That remark will cost him another 5 points in the polls.
It also indicates his desperation, and dovetails with past sexist remarks. (Google Obama’s sweetie problem.)

Posted by: Stephen Gianell | September 9, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

And they said McCain was the one with the bad temper…..
Next thing you know he’ll be stomping his feet on the playground.

Posted by: SandyB | September 9, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

The “lipstick on a pig” analogy is old as dirt and doesn’t necessarily have anything to do with Sarah Palin. Stop trying to create drama where there is none. If you reporters need drama, I suggest the Lifetime Channel.

Posted by: ROB | September 9, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

The CHANGEling will wish — if he doesn’t already wish — he hadn’t said this. Will he attribute it to some suddenly-deceased staffer?
Coupling an old fish smell with anybody, especially anything involving a woman, is bad enough, but mentioning “lipstick on a pig”, right after Palin used the word “lipstick” in her speeches, is pretty cheap.
Is the hateful little “change” agent — who didn’t bring any perceptible change to Chicago — calling Palin a pig?
OBAMA’s the PIG. But he probably only wears detectable lipstick at home.

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Well scares me is that here’s this woman we know very little about, and the McCain camp doesn’t want us to know about and all of a sudden she’s the best thing since sliced bread. If we get this election wrong we are headed even faster down the slippery slope the Republicans have put us on.
I think Palin is a smart woman and McCain is a hero but I don’t trust that they have a clue about running this country. I’m afraid the country will be run by the same Karl Rove crooks that are running it now.

Posted by: Marion | September 9, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

“You can put lipstick on a pig” is a very old saying used down here in the South. So for all you idiots crying sexist, please hold on to your draws.

Posted by: Kevin | September 9, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Most people would rather see someone that looks like their daughter in the whitehouse no matter how unqualify or incompetent they are…Now its not experience that rules the day but executive capability…so what you are telling is..because I can run a mom and pop grocery (Mayor/governor alaska) store that I can run Macy’s department store..LOL

Posted by: lionel | September 9, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Well said….Barack!!! Give them H…!!!
But be cautious don’t get too carried away they may send the “hockey moms” for you.

Posted by: sharonne | September 9, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

McCain has been in the Washington for 25 years and voted with Bush 90% of the time, and he want’s to continue Bush’s failed policy. Saying you’re gonna change Washington is committing political fraud.

Posted by: Patriot | September 9, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

“You can put lipstick on as pig” is an old saying. Jesus, is everything now sexist and directed at Sarah palin? Hillary said the same thign during the Piladelphia debate aboutt he Bush administration.

Posted by: Kevin | September 9, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Obama’s sharp, insightful criticism of his opponents will surely win over the undecided vote!
Where are flowing oratorical flourishes, the high minded ideals, the ‘change we can believe in’ shtick?
Oh, the teleprompter is missing!

Posted by: FedUp389 | September 9, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

This is not about being a game, this is to lead the Country! Mamma Moose has taken some low shots her self and not at moose. She is in with the boys and gave her best now she and those of you who are so glad to be “one of her” should be able to dish and take what comes your way. Why should he take the high rode you mosse momma’s don’t understand the language other than the trash talk moose momma speaks She calls her husband first dude how cute and CHEAP!

Posted by: lions2tigers | September 9, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

the pig remark will not earn Obama any wal-mart moms. he is so low and pity.

Posted by: amy | September 9, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Obama Campaign speeches higlights
1. Stem Cell Rant – Biden
2. Jesus was a community Organizer-Union Chief
3. ‘You Can Put Lipstick on a Pig, But It’s Still a Pig’ – Obama
4. “Mother, governor, moose shooter. That’s cool” – Obama
Signs of desparation. Isn’t it?

Posted by: Tim | September 9, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

the funniest thing I’ve seen today.ZeroBama should run for comedy central competetion instead of presidency.
0bama-Never!

Posted by: MIKE | September 9, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

There’s that new politics for ya.

Posted by: John | September 9, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

So since Obama is a liar, he will always be a liar.
Since Obama leads his followers in hate, he will always do that.
Since Obama is deceitful to the people he will always be decitful.
A man who throws his grandmother under a train will always throw someone under the train. Like Obama
A man who sells out the small town people to the wealth he will always sell them out. Like Obama
If a man lies to the people and goes behind thier back and tells another country he is lying to the people, he always do that. like obama
If a man hides his background and friends, will alway hide something. Like Obama
Yep Mr obama will always do the same as he always done.

Posted by: seah | September 9, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

What!!! DID HE SAY CHELSEA CLINTON was so ugly because her father was JANET RENO! Oh!? That was John McCain wasn’t it? I don’t agree with the innuendo attached to Obama’s statement here, but I suppose all the candidates make mistakes don’t they?
I’m leaning toward the ticket in which the number 2 wasn’t chosen for Pandering and Hypocritical purposes.

Posted by: John Doe | September 9, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

SEAH, according to you followers of christ betrayed him, therefore followers of christ WILL ALWAYS BETRAY HIM!!!!!

Posted by: EL | September 9, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

“You know, you can put lipstick on a pig”
hahahahahaha

Posted by: Vanessa | September 9, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

Keep it up Obama!!! Palin…the chatty Cathy doll, pull her string and she says the same thing over and over again McCain harping this whole time we need experience for this job. It’s a big bad world out there.Only he had the experience to handle foreign affairs and protect our country.Now he expects us to believe Palin will be ready on day one.Nice try McCain Not now Not ever.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

obamadise is melting down!
when you compare women to pigs and the smell of fish (even if it is a freudian slip), i do not think you are fit to lead a nation of 50% women!!
better to lose an election than lose your grip -

Posted by: M | September 9, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Lipstick on a pig sounds more like a description of Obama/Biden pork barrel earmarks.
Obama and Old Joe Biden have a longer partnership than first thought.
To the point, Obama pursued over $3,000,000.00 in earmarks for Biden’s son, at the same time that Biden claims he didn’t get personally lobbied by Hunter Biden for his clients.
Obama apparently provided the necessary cover for Old Joe Biden.
The Obama/Biden investment in Hunter Biden’s salary has paid large dividends.
With so many friends among his father’s colleagues, Hunter didn’t need to meet with Dad to score pork for his clients.
It’s one example of how Obama and Biden offer hypocritical sanctimony on their relations with lobbyists while ensuring that family and friends get their share from the public hog trough.
Consider the Obama/Biden behavior towards earmarks for a Catholic school.
Democrats insist that school vouchers for urban parents would violate the Constitution because the parents might choose to send their children to parochial schools.
However, since Hunter Biden signed St. Xavier University, a four-year, 5,600-student institution run by the Roman Catholic Sisters of Mercy in Orland Park, IL as a client, he has managed to secure them over $300,000 in federal grants.
Hunter specifically landed St. Xavier U after telling them he could get them government pork.
This is the kind of activity Obama rails about on the campaign trail.
However, Obama actually enables it through these kind of quid pro quo arrangements that give the appearance that Biden has no conflict of interest.
In contrast, John McCain doesn’t do earmarks at all — not for himself, not for his friends, and not for his political allies.
Anybody But Obama…

Posted by: Jayhawk | September 9, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Can you imagine if Sarah had said that about barack? oooooh!

Posted by: elixelx | September 9, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

This guy has lost his mind.
what the hell is he doing???

Posted by: kacy | September 9, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

WE NEEDED TO BRING HOME TWO OR THREE BRIGADES, SO THEY CAN REST UP WITH THEIR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS. THEN WE WOULD HAVE THE FORCES NEEDED TO SUPPORT OUT TROOPS IN AFGANISTAN WHERE MY SON IS NOW. HE SERVED IN THE NAVY BUT WAS PUSHED INTO GOING ARMY.
WE WILL NOT BE LIKED IN EITHER WAR BECAUSE OF THE LOSS OF THERE FAMILIES, JOBS, HOME ETC. THEIR COUNTRY HAS BEEN TOREN UP BY FORCES FIGHTING ON THE GROUND. CIVILIANS ARE GETTING KILLED IN AFGANISTAN BY DRONE BOMBINGS.
MCCAIN SAYS HE WILL CONSIDER 2013 AS A TIME TO HAVE TROOPS HOME. THIS WILL DEPEND ON HOW OUR GENERALS REPORT THE SUCCESS OR FAILURE OF ISSUES ON THE GROUND.
WHAT OR WHEN WILL WE ENDORSE AND MOVE ON NEW ENVIRONMENTAL SAFER ENERGYS SUCH AS NATURAL GAS LIKE IRAN IS DOING, SO THEY CAN SELL MORE OIL AT A 120 DOLLARS A BARREL TO COUNTRIES LIKE THE U.S. I DROVE A BATTERY PICKUP IN 2002, BUT I HAD TO SAFE ENOUGH ENERGY TO GET BACK HOME. I THEN HAD TO CHARGE BATTERY FOR HOURS. WHAT ABOUT A NATURAL GAS AND ELECTRIC HYBRID?
Iraq McCain emphasizes the ‘success’ of the surge pointing to a decrease in violence as evidence of the surge’s success. However, he fails to acknowledge the agreement made between Maqtada al-Sadr and the Iraqi government…. Al-Sadr is the most powerful cleric in Baghdad. But for the agreement between al-Sadr and the Iraqi government, there would still be major violence.. In fact, after the surge had been harolded a victory, there was a spike in violence as the Sadr-Iraqi agreement dissolved. Sadr’s Mahqti army restarted their attacks. It was only after al-Sadr and the Iraqi government restarted negotiations that the violence was once more subsided. McCain only understands military force. His narrow mindedness is reflective of Bush’s approach to resolving issues. Even a religious cleric like al-Sadr is capable of understanding the usefulness of negotiations. It’s sad McCain-iacs are too psychophatically violent to think rationally. McCain is very misleading.U.S. SecurityHow is Iraq a threat to U.S. security again? Oh, al-Qaeda will take over the Iraqi government if the U.S. leaves? For real? Did Patreus say that? Whatever govenment exists after the U.S. leaves will most likely despise America. I doubt it will be al-Qaeda. The most likely ruler of Iraq will be someone like al-Sadr–If you don’t know who al-Sadr is, please do some research. Even if it isn’t al-Sadr, the next government will be anti-American. I imagine the citizens of a country that was unjustly invaded by another country, consequently causing the death of over one hundred thousand of its citizens due to the disstabilization of the government, will abhor the invading country. That’s a natural reaction. And if the Iraqi government in place after the U.S. leaves reflects the desires of Iraqis, the Iraqi government will hate America. It won’t be al-Qaeda. I wish McCain would stop saying that.

Posted by: MICHAEL | September 9, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

lol!

Posted by: EL | September 9, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Obviously, Obama has poor judgement. Every time he opens his mouth it is more apparent.

Posted by: Kitty | September 9, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Game over DNC. GAME OVER!!!!!!

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Obama is losing it. This massive entertainer is losing it, I am telling you. He’s not good when he’s ahead or behind. The electoral vote is next.

Posted by: young_voter | September 9, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Sounds like one of those Greek columns must have fallen over and klunked him on the head………

Posted by: SandyB | September 9, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Calling a wife, mother, and the Governor of Alaska a pig with lipstick…
Sheer desperation…
You can hear it in Obama’s voice…
And read it in Biden’s gaffes…
Anybody But Obama…

Posted by: Jayhawk | September 9, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Obama will NOT win because he is a black man. Damn shame it’s 2008 and people still judge you by the color of your skin.

Posted by: VH | September 9, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

WOWWWW… you go boy, keep showing those true colors. We are all convinced you really got it in you, being the gutter politician you so hardly tried to claim not to be! I am sure these kind of comments help you enfranchise women and independent voters. Words of advise, even though you have the luxury of having at least 93% of the black votes, these only make up about 13% of total population.

Posted by: frescooda | September 9, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Speaking of pigs, did you hear 0bama pushed legislation to teach sex education to kindergartners? What kind thinks sex education needs to be taught to 5 year olds?”
Like a trained seal, concerned bellows forth the latest Republican lie. Actually not the latest, its a retread from Alan Keyes
When Obama’s campaign was asked by ABC News to explain what kind of sex education Obama considers “age appropriate” for kindergarteners, the Obama campaign pointed to an Oct. 6, 2004 story from the Daily Herald in which Obama had “moved to clarify” in his Senate campaign that he “does not support teaching explicit sex education to children in kindergarten. . . The legislation in question was a state Senate measure last year that aimed to update Illinois’ sex education standards with ‘medically accurate’ information . . . ‘Nobody’s suggesting that kindergartners are going to be getting information about sex in the way that we think about it,’ Obama said. ‘If they ask a teacher ‘where do babies come from,’ that providing information that the fact is that it’s not a stork is probably not an unhealthy thing. Although again, that’s going to be determined on a case by case basis by local communities and local school boards.’”
In addition to local schools informing kindergarteners that babies do not come from the stork, the state legislation Obama supported in Illinois, which contained an “opt out” provision for parents, also envisioned teaching kindergarteners about “inappropriate touching,” according to Obama’s presidential campaign.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

OBAMA just said exactly what needed to be said. The truth. And its hurts. Sorry…

Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 9, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

The AMAZING thing to me is that the media ACTUALLY reported what Obama said! Usually they are so busy kissing his ring and polishing his shoes that they don’t actually report on what comes out of Marxist Man’s mouth.

Posted by: Thinker | September 9, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

The Chicago-style, hack politician is starting to rear its ugly head…
And Obamabots think it is the second coming…
Desperation…
Anybody But Obama…

Posted by: Jayhawk | September 9, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

That lipstick pitbull line by Palin was not an Adlib Jake.
Before her speech, I used the google and several stories mentioned her using that same line in the past.
It’s a derivative of an old sexist joke about the difference between a female dog and a woman.
Palin ad-libbed nothing during her speech. The lipstick on a pig thing is quite old too. Facts do matter.

Posted by: trifecta | September 9, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

“Don’t think he meant the insult, but I think he is getting sloppy…”
A fair assessment by Wade amongst a wave of fake outrage.

Posted by: RyanC | September 9, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

The phrase is in fact an old saying meaning:
As a metaphor, the phrase “like putting lipstick on a pig” indicates a lost cause or a futile gesture. The idea is that a pig will never be glamorous, no matter how well-coifed. Some things are simply beyond salvaging.
That said, I think using it may have crossed a line. But then Palin did call herself a dog.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

“Belle Starr you are an idiot. Those two analogies go back to when Moses wore short shorts. They have nothign to do with Palin. I cannot believe someone that lives in the United States has never heard those sayings. This fake outrage is getting sickening.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

McCain is using Palin. She’s a firewall, you can’t say ANYTHING against her or they will turn it around, regardless of what it is, into something sexist. She is a step backward for America and women.
What Barack said is an old expression, but he should be careful in this stupid environment.

Posted by: mos | September 9, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Game over – for Obama! All those democratic women that choice is not a top three issue are not going to pull a lever for the “street” politician from Chicago.

Posted by: Demnomore | September 9, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Ha Ha….here we go. We’re being sexist. He was talking about McCain’s “change” mantra. Get a gripe. It’s not always about Palin.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

It’s an old expression. The fake outrage is just dumb.

Posted by: Brandon | September 9, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

And, how is it that Obama and Old Joe Biden keep harping about changing the way things are done in Washington…
Let’s see…Old Joe Biden has been a part of Washington for about 35 years. Joe was sitting in the Senate when John McCain was a POW in Hanoi.
And, the liberal, left-wing Democrats have been in control of both houses of Congress for the last two years…
So, are Obama and OBiden going to change the Democrats?
Or, should their change start at home?
Desperate and pathetic…
Anybody But Obama…

Posted by: Jayhawk | September 9, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Pig = Pork, and Palin is the queen of Pork. Alaska rates third in the spending of federal revenue at $1.86 spent for every dollar paid in federal taxes. 4th place goes to LA at $1.74, and they are rebuilding from Hurricane Katrina! Add to that the state profit of 75% on every barrel of oil they produce – American oil we buy. The federal government subsidizes finding the oil, drilling for the oil, tax breaks to the oil companies and furthermore, the wells are on federal land. Why should Alaska profit at the expense of the rest of the country? And don’t even get me started on the lack of services and infrastructure all of this revenue provides for the Alaskan people. Pigs are bright, and do far more to serve this country… the real insult here is directed at them!

Posted by: Sara | September 9, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Obama should know he has to be careful. The closet racists are looking for any reason to come down on him. But they should realize he is more White than black since his mother was white and he was raised by her and her parents.
Palin is a fake. She acts like a wind-up doll the republicans are primping to say the right things and smile while she tell lies and throw daggers.
If she is so bright and ready to be VP why does she have to be sheltered from telling the american people how she and Mccaine intends to govern the Country with policies of change.
The American people cannot be so fickle as the latest polls maybe indicating.

Posted by: mal | September 9, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

She called herself pit bull with a lipstick

Posted by: James | September 9, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

When Palin referecen lipstick last week, that was exactly was I was thinking: “you can put lipstick on the GOP, it’s still the GOP”

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Imploding right in front of our eyes…what a shame…

Posted by: fromHILLtoMAC | September 9, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Obama should say, The Only change McCain will bring to the White House is when someone has to change his depends. Obama Comon You have to hit harder. Maybe he should bring up Sarah Palins alledged affair. Or any other of the numerous scandals.

Posted by: Dandury | September 9, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

I’ve heard that expression used before and I’m also an Obama supporter but I just don’t think it serves him well to be saying anything that might come even close to sounding “sexist”. Not everyone in this country is on the same educational level….
I’m alittle shocked at him actually.

Posted by: Denise | September 9, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

The newsmen at ABC shouldn’t be surprised by the disconnect between supporting issues or supporting candidates for their character. People, not issues, sit in the Oval Office. If the character of the man or woman cannot be trusted, the issues they run on have no chance of seeing daylight.
Does any Obama fan truly believe he would embody the new “traditionally Conservative” issues he’s trying on daily? Liberal clothing isn’t in vogue, yet it’s the only duds that fit him.

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

New rep slogan; Drill,POW,Surge and “I told washington thanks but no thanks to the bridge to nowhere” Pull my string and I’ll say it again.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

He’ll come out tomorrow and give another big speech and say this was just another Freudian slip from hearing so much about the lipstick remark in Palin’s speech.

Posted by: SandyB | September 9, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Calling Biden a Washington insider… his state rates 45th in government spending indequities at 77 cents for every dollar of tax revenue they provide. You clearly need to brush up on your facts. This is all published by the federal tax foundation. In case you want to attack Obama on earmarks or spending, his state ranks 45th at 75 cents on the dollar. McCain ranks 21st at $1.19 for every dollar. So, oddly, our reformers are the only ones taking more than they give!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sara | September 9, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Obama has been nothing but respectful towards both McCain and Palin. When she announced that her teenage daughter was pregnant and the press questioned Obama, his reply was nothing but respectful towards her. And then in return, she was mean and viscious towards Obama in her speech. (Not Christian traits.) Obama is the true Christian from what I can see. And regarding Obama’s choice for VP, I was disappointed a bit at first because I was and still am a Hillary supporter; but after listening to all sides, Biden is a very good choice. As a Hillary supporter, I respect her advice and knowledge and will vote as she recommends.
Palin is a duplicate of Rosanne Barr. Close your eyes when listening to her and you will hear Rosanne. Her voice and her sarcasm. The sarcasm gets old fast and is not really humorous. And definitely NOT Christian.
If you vote based on issues and who will make a better leader, you will vote for Obama. If you vote based on popularity of the VP and don’t care that your life has been hell for the past few years, then you will vote for McCain.

Posted by: Marie | September 9, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Blue vs Red states….again…same states, same anger, same game…the only difference is we are poorer, more despised and more unhappy then the last election and the one before that…why are many of the red states generally poor, with low levels of education and the highest violent crime rates in the country and the blue states..ie upper midwest, west coast, mid atlantic and NE generally wealthy with the least social problems…the red states should begin to notice a trend here??? Why don’t they try something a bit different..maybe vote for a independent or god forbid a democrat…this is not a fair playing field…the blue states have less to lose if another bad govt takes over the red states will be offered another eight years of stifling poverty, violent crime, and all the rest…go ahead red states…keep making the blue states richer…cant figure out why….

Posted by: Bob | September 9, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

He is losing voters. I know 4 four people today that changed their votes to McCain and two that have decided not to vote at all.
The DNC should never have nominated him. PERIOD. Obama has his own arrogance to blame for this. He should have just played it cool and Hillary I bet, would have given him the VP spot. He would have got more experience and mentoring and possibly could have become
the all important first black president that he wants to be. The DNC could have been in for 16 years. Although if I were Hillary I would have been leery of Lady McBeth Michelle.
Granted the DNC is also responsible for this fiasco. Someone should have say that this was getting way out of hand during the primaries.
I don’t find Obama to be a smart guy at all. there is a difference between book smarts and having common sense. As a professional I cherish my relationships with my mentors and would never do what Obama did to Alice Palmer or Hillary Clinton. It is just arrogant and a false sense of entitlement.
Michelle Obama has said “It’s now or Never”…Face it Michelle it may be never.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

McCain and Palin are puppets for the Republican party status quo. There is no thinking for themselves. Everything is scripted. The American people are being manipulated and they’re too stupid to figure it out. How sad.

Posted by: Mark | September 9, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

PRESIDENT OBAMA JUST SPOKE THE TRUTH. WHY DOES IT HURT SO BAD?
PEOPLE CAN’T TAKE THE TRUTH ANYMORE EHH?

Posted by: Comeje Will | September 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Obama is a rude, nasty child. He needs to go back to Chicago and get some of his “educational reform”. I That sums up all Obama accomplished as a state legislator for the people he was supposed to represent.

Posted by: Karen | September 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Palin is truely the Queen of Pork, that’s why she’s so popular in Alaska, who wouldn’t be!
She taxes the drilling of oil and doles out the surplusses to her voters to the tune of thousands of dollars a yeaar; and she dupes the rest of the country in paying for her Bridges to Nowhere (yes, there are more Bridges to Nowhere she’s aksing the rest of the country to pay for)

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Obama why are you so mad???? The new kid came to town and now your not number #1!!! Are you feeling lonely?? You just screwed yourself senator!!

Posted by: santo | September 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

At least he was respectful to her until she started comparing her mayorial and gubernatorial experience to his “community organizing” experience, and the polls starting running in the opposite direction…………….

Posted by: SandyB | September 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Ok.. think Obama is kinda losing it

Posted by: Jr Ewing | September 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

I absolutely LOVE the comment. As a firm McCain supporter, it’s fun to watch Obama fall apart like this. Regardless of his intentions, his choice of words has undoubtedly alienated him from even more of the female base… can’t wait until the next polling data comes out and shows an even greater double-digit lead for McCain/Palin. The Republicans don’t even need to campaign anymore. Just give Obama a microphone and he’ll win the election for us!

Posted by: Roger in DC | September 9, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

Say it louder Barak so the entire country can hear you!!
McCain and Palin are both lying phonies. They will stoop to any level to win votes. They are depraved. They are degenerates. They sling mud and stand behind a Bible for cover. They wrap themselves in a flag and ignore the Constitution. They are fake. They are phony. They are even worse than Bush/Cheney. Sarah Palin is nothing but a distraction. She has said ZEROP about any issue. That’s because she is there to distract the public from John McCain’s shortcomings. Americans a sooooooo GULLIBLE. Don’t fall for their deceptions!

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

PRESIDENT OBAMA JUST SPOKE THE TRUTH. WHY DOES IT HURT SO BAD?
PEOPLE CAN’T TAKE THE TRUTH ANYMORE EHH?

Posted by: COMEJE WILL | September 9, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Voting for BHO is buying a pig in a poke! Go look up that one, Bammy – you will see that it fits you perfectly!

Posted by: Beckie | September 9, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

The McCain Lies and Smear team is out in force today.
I just heard Obama talking about Bush Adm policies which were bad and he used a common expression to describe them: a pig with lipstick is still a pig. He immediately compared the same to fish that stink too, but that was not considered an insult to Palin.
What? Anytime lipstick is mentioned it is an insult to Palin and a sexist attack.
No doubt he will be attacked tomorrow because he said he favors stem-cell research as did Biden. Already, Biden was accused of insulting sexist attack on Palin.
Nothing these two men or any Democrat can say is anything but an insult to Palin.
We have lost our First Amendment Rights because of Palin.
Everything in life is NOT about Palin. Most of us never heard of Palin eleven days ago.
Now the whole world revolves around deference to Palin.
Naff off Lies and Smear team.
Lipstick. Lipstick. Lipstick. Lipstick.

Posted by: susan | September 9, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

“Each class or course in comprehensive sex education offered in any of grades K through 12 shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV.”
K-12 is standard shorthand for elementary education. Its not saying that kindegartners will be taught sex ed, only that any sex ed class taught will include those items.
Read more closely before you start posting these things…don’t believe everything McCain tells you.

Posted by: Erin | September 9, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

mccain started his campain with the theme that he was the guy wit experience—and he was right—did not achieve anything—-8 years experience as mcbush——now he wants to steal obama platform of change—-next he will try to steal obamas clothes–or maybe come out in greasepaint—–the guy is a othe add showing him hugging bush is priceless.

Posted by: rodney | September 9, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

“He’ll come out tomorrow and give another big speech and say this was just another Freudian slip … “

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Republicans don’t like it when people use some Straight Talk.
Booohooooohoooooo.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

They attack Obama for saying a phrase that’s common where he’s speaking. No one attacks Palin for repeating her “thanks but no thanks” line every single day for the last week and a half. I’m so sick and tired of the Right Wing bloggers. You people are truly unconscienable.

Posted by: Maura | September 9, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Of course he is referring to Sarah Palin! He was trying to play on her pit bull comment. But, when she said the pit bull thing she was telling a joke and referring to herself. So, you people trying to defend him by saying that this phrase is as old as Moses, you really are looking desparate now. Obama made a big mistake today. Calling Palin a pig and McCain a dead smelly fish, won’t get him anymore votes. He should have just stuck to the same old thing he has been spewing out for months.

Posted by: ohiogirl | September 9, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

CHICAGO POLITICS FRONT AND CENTER!!!!!

Posted by: CC | September 9, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Hey concerned just found out where you got that fake quote…a McCain email!
You do simply recycle McCain talking points…how pathetic!
The Romney campaign further asserted that the legislation Obama had backed in Illinois went so far as to call for sexually transmitted disease prevention to be taught in kindergarten. But that bill also called for any sexual education programs offered to handle all topics in an “age and developmentally appropriate” manner, and it also let parents choose to keep their children out of such classes.
That bottom part is the key.
But like a true Republican lie recycler, you leave it out.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Most of the women I know are appalled by Palin’s ability to continue to lie to the American people about “the bridge to nowhere”. We all know she supported it but she won’t admit it. That shows me she has no class or integrity.

Posted by: mary | September 9, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Don’t forget who else voted for that Bridge to Nowhere, Mary –
OBAMA AND BIDEN — and Palin backed out of it BEFORE they did.
Stick that in your lipstick….or your fishstick…

Posted by: Rog in DC | September 9, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

This type of language is undignified. It is unpresidential.
This should cause more women, who are more likely to find such language offensive and crude, to flock over to McCain/Palin.

Posted by: bebe | September 9, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Mary, you are lying. Most women I know love her and don’t give a darn about what liberal media say.

Posted by: marylie | September 9, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

How do you people get that he was talking about Palin when he said that? It’s true the GOP is like a pig, even if you put lipstick on the pig it’s still a pig. It was not meant as a reference to Palin.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

“Voting for BHO is buying a pig in a poke!”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

The origin of the saying “…lipstick
on a pig” doesn’t really matter. It
comes off as highly sexist, and polls show mccain with a 12 pt lead with white women. Obama is misguided and not savvy enough to keep from
looking like a sexist jerk…maybe because he is a sexist jerk.

Posted by: katherine | September 9, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

“I was from the south and I have never heard of the expression if you put lipstick on a pig, its still a pig.”
I’m in the South and I have. Sometimes they say ‘rouge on a pig’.
On the other hand, I’m sort of suspicious of the men who use that phrase and keep them far away from my pigpen.

Posted by: len | September 9, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Obama has sunk to a new low. Calling Palin a pig is a discusting attack. This is the person liberals want for president? How can any self respecting woman that supports Obama live with herself?
LIBERAL=SEXIST

Posted by: julia | September 9, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

No comments about her scamming taxpayer monies for staying at ‘Hotel Palin’?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Blue vs Red = mostly rich states vs mostly poor states…look it up…why is this? Why do the red states want to keep voting in the same economic philosophy that has been in place the last 8 years…they are struggling..the blue states will be ok whoever wins or loses the red states..ie lousiana, etc…will not…red states stop voting your ego and make some changes…dont you want less violent crime, better economic conditions?

Posted by: salliemae | September 9, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Huh. I think there is a serious problem of people confusing things said by random people and things said by the political campaigns themselves.
No one on the Obama campaign compared him to Jesus. This miner doesn’t work for Obama.
There have been similar instances of people calling out quotes and attributing it to the McCain camp. Just because the leader of a statewide group of college Republicans made racist remarks and was forced to resign, doesn’t mean McCain is a racist.
The Obama campaign has been downright civil during his campaign to the point where a lot of democrats are starting to ask him to be more aggressive and go negative to counter McCain. Obama has by and large limited his attacks to policy issues. There have been no character assassinations coming out of his camp.
There has been Plenty of character assassinations coming from both Obama and McCain supporters though. It seems to be in the age of ubiquitous Internet access and pseudo-anonymous forums, people feel they can spout both sexist and racist comments, make up bald faced lies and smear both sides with baseless allegations.
I would remind people to examine the source of what they read before taking something at face value. The reason the mainstream media doesn’t print half the crap you people are spouting is because it is unverified or unverifiable.
This election should be about the issues. After all, in the end, the policies the next administration has is what will affect us.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

The ignorance of some you people astounds and disgusts me. For the record, I’m undecided. I see the positives and negatives of both tickets, which some of you would too, if you took a second to think.
1. If you’ve never heard the “lipstick on a pig” analogy, you’re either very young or very ignorant. I mean ignorant in the purest sense of the word; you don’t know much. It’s been around for decades, and simply means trying to make something (not someONE) appear better than it is. He is not calling Palin a pig.
2. Same thing about fish stinking. It is not a personal attack on the people, it is about their policies. Get over yourselves already!
3. I’ve heard the following reasons that people are attracted to Sarah Palin and therefore more likely to vote for McCain: She’s got spunk; she’s tough; she’s a hockey mom; she looks like me. Truth is, the vast majority of us do not know enough about her to decide one way or the other. I’m waiting until the debate and interviews. I want to hear her speak in an unscripted manner about something other than the bridge to nowhere.
4. Suggested reading: How Stupid Are We? by Shenkman
5.THINK PEOPLE!

Posted by: A THINKING Person | September 9, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

LOL, this is actually getting rather humorous.
I’ve watched and read and listened to Obama’s supporters call anyone who opposes, questions or refuses to support their candidate names. All these months, Hillary Clinton and John McCain supporters have had to put up with that type of behavior. Now we see the almighty is just the same as his “intelligent, educated” supporters – how classy to refer to another candidate as a pig (and, give me a break – it’s a way he talks?!). At least have the guts to stand up and say that’s what you meant if you are going to try to get laughs that way.
I’m just glad that in his desperation, Obama is letting more and more people see him for what he is: a small little man who can’t take criticism, can’t take any questions and certainly can’t take any competition.
LOL – and he thought Hillary Clinton was a problem for him. Too bad the DNC didn’t think this one through. You threw the election – good job.

Posted by: traci | September 9, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Hey Republicans…I have to comment on your assestment that the media has been sexism against Sarah Palin because they are asking if she can handle the job as VP and still be able to care for her family.
First of all…you MUST recognize that the men candidates have also been asked this of them. The one example that races to my mind is when Elizabeth Edwards revealed her cancer had come back and everyone was asking could John Edwards handle looking after his family at the same time he was running for president.
So please, please refrain from a close-minded approach that anytime we question Sarah Palin it’s because we’re sexist. I’m a woman and I am asking this same question because she has 5 teenage children and they are at an age where they are very impressionable…that’s fair. Just like it was fair to question Edwards if he could handle running for Pres. while his wife was in her vulnerable state.
What scares me is that women might be focusing on trying to prove a point at the expense of putting our country back on the right track. The republicans are dangerous…and as a mother to be (my baby arrives in Dec.) I’m more concerned on making the point that I cannot entrust my baby’s future to a party that wrecklessly thrusted us into a war that never should have been waged. I’m more concerned that the republican party for the next 8 years will countinue to harms us economically and do nothing to advance our educational system. That’s what we should be focusing on.
If your focus is sexism and accusing anyone of that when we question whether or not our candidates are capable of handling the job, than you’re doing a bigger disservice and you need to recognize that. I’ve got the right to ask ALL questions of our politicians because I’ve got the responsiblity to my family to vote for the person that I believe will best benefit us as a country. And if the media can help me get those answers, then your damn right I’m going to listen and take advantage of that tool…not to say I won’t look for other tools to help me gather info. on our candidates.
And for all you women who vote for McCain just because he’s got a woman on the ticket…ask yourself this question:
will you feel good about yourselves voting for a man who would keep us in Iraq indefinitely…if so then don’t complain when your sons and daughters come home in a body bag. Will you feel good about yourselves for voting for a ticket that refuses to believe we have an economic disaster…than don’t complain when you lose your home, or your jobs and can’t pay the bills or send your kids to college.
The republicans don’t have a plan! That is why for them, this election will be about personality than issues. That’s what they are good at, distracting us from what really matters. Remember this 8 years ago: “Now Bush…there’s a guy I can have a beer with.” Well eight years later, we can’t even afford the damn beer.
Women don’t reduce yourselves to what the Republicans are wanting you to be…empty women who vote with their bras instead of their brains.”
WE’RE BETTER THAN THAT!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: sandra | September 9, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

“The expression is you can’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

Barry is not so winsome when he gets worried and desperate.

Posted by: Steve | September 9, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

MARY ANNE – Black people know that Obama is half black. Is that supposed to be bad. Children from mixed race couples are common in the black community. Black people are not as racist as whites are. They are much more accepting of whites than the other way around. So stop it with the old divide and conquer tactic, it doesn’t work anymore.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Mary Anne: Boohooohooooo
What’s next? Tears?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Sara -
Women voting for a ticket that has a woman on it….JUST because of that…
Kind of like Blacks in America who are ONLY voting for Obama because he’s Black…
Kind of wild, huh?

Posted by: Roger in DC | September 9, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Obama backs ” sex appropiate” education.Teach kindergardeners about proper and unproper touching to help protect themselves against pdephiles. This is a bad thing?

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 9, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Gee, what is he going to say if they get another bump in the polls?
Methinks the man is Chicago politician.
He does get greased by Tony Rezko, right?

Posted by: Edward T | September 9, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

old john has not lost his touch—using women–he shows how dumb women can be.

Posted by: rodney | September 9, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

So much for his campaign not being involved in sexist or personal attacks! How low will the Democrats go to win? Keep it up Obama! All you’re doing is guaranteeing a victory for McCain/Palin. Your childish attacks are not going unnoticed…and don’t even try to spin this as unintentional.

Posted by: Cory | September 9, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

When will Palin answer questions about the “Bridge to nowhere” she supported before she opposed (… and then kept the money for other pork-barrel spending in Alaska)?
When will Palin finish her crash course on foreign countries, leaders, and policy positions so she will be allowed to talk to the media?
When will Palin come up with an acceptable way to explain that she believes in using public dollars to teach creationism in public schools?
When will Palin come up with an acceptable way to explain that she doesn’t believe in global warming?
When will Palin explain how an abstinence only education failed to keep her teenage daughter from getting pregnant out of wedlock?
When will Sarah Palin answer to the American People? (or will she continue to hold her head and nose high to the little people of America and demand deference of them?)

Posted by: ron | September 9, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Let’s be realistic. The fact is that gas prices are crazy regardless of what color, nationality, gender or religion. We are Americans and as Americans we not only want change we need change.
In the last eight years jobs have been lost and food has increased. People these are the basic necessity.
To the person who said that black people make up 13% percent of the population. That statement could very well be true; however if thats the case then the majority are affected the most.
Keep it real simple people. This is 2008 color doesn’t matter when the most important color is green!
It’s sad that Iraq has a surplus of 79 billion dollars while America is so concerned about rather a white man or a black man will run the white house.
If Korea decides to attack, they’re not aiming to towards whites or black they will be aiming at the United States.
Unless you make at least 5 million dollars a year most people are in the same boat.
To the people who wants to make this a racial race my advise is to GET OVER YOURSELVES, cause quite frankly when it’s time to pay your mortgage and put food on the table you would careless on the color of our president!!!

Posted by: Realistic | September 9, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Even if the comment wasn’t meant for Palin, she is the queen of PORK SPENDING!

Posted by: NMP | September 9, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Concerned: you really want to compare Bidens correct declarations with Palin’s scamming?
Man, you’re really desperate.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

“Obama is letting more and more people see him for what he is: a small little man who can’t take criticism, can’t take any questions and certainly can’t take any competition.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

What a jerk!!! I suggest ALL WOMEN SEND OBAMA OUR LIPSTICK!!!!
Send him a message that we are voting for Palin. What a sexist PIG!!!
He is going to lose big among women!

Posted by: Megan | September 9, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

You know, when I first read about this, I just saw the “lipstick on a pig” headline…and I thought, c’mon, be fair, it’s an expression. But then the *next* *sentence* is about an “old fish” and “8 years” – making it obvious he’s making personal attacks on his opponents. This is just disgusting. What a juvenile little punk.

Posted by: ds | September 9, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

For all the people crying Palin lied about the bridge. Please check out a recent CNN interview with her former aid — the bridge she supported was not the same one, there is a need for bridge to connect the airport and the city. But when Palin took that office, the cost for this bridge is way higher than when she looked it.
I hope ABC interview will ask her about this and let her give out her side of story. People here are so willingly fooled by the liberal liars — yes the same liars who spread out rumors of fake pregancy, AIP, and Palin-cut-funding for teen mom and special needs children. None of those is true.
There is a reprint of the book “Sarah”, for those who want to get a balanced reprot, check that book. This is not a book written by herself for gains.

Posted by: amy | September 9, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

He was not linking a “lipstick” line to her “lipstick” line.
Suuuurrrreeee, I can believe that.
Suuuurrrreeee.

Posted by: John Robinson | September 9, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

This is the same passive/agressive bullcrap Obama did to Hillary. He knew what he was doing. He has very thin skin and always feels the need to go into the gutter and do one better should he get attacked. It’s that Chicago thug mentality ingrained into him. There are far too many instances of Obama behaving like this, for this to be a coincidence. This guy is a real sexist pig. Whenever he is denigrating someone, it always seems to be a woman he’s verbally beating on.

Posted by: OxyCon | September 9, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

LOL,
Did you know that McCain’s former spokesperson Torie Clark wrote a book called “Lipstick on a Pig: Winning in the No Spin Era by Someone Who Knows the Game”
That’s for all those sheltered right wingers who imply Obama invented the phrase as a shot at Palin since THEY never heard it.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

At least he was respectful to her until she started comparing her mayorial and gubernatorial experience to his “community organizing” experience, and the polls starting running in the opposite direction……….
___________________________________________
Uh, so how long was he respectful to her? There was about a week between her announcement as VP and her making that speech.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

I cannot belive he said that.

Posted by: nic | September 9, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Obama did NOT call Palin a pig? Stop projecting your own thoughts and biases upon others. He made reference to a common cliche’. Palin compares herself to a pit bull dog with lipstick. So, watch out McCain, that breed (pit bull) has been known to turn on its master. McCain, watch your back. Your political pawn may pull the rug right from under your feet.

Posted by: M. J. | September 9, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Realistic –
Amen — That’s why I don’t care. Personally, if Colin Powell was running for President, he would probably have my vote this election. But I’m not going to vote for Obama because he’s not qualified. I’m not completely wild about McCain either, but he’s definitely running circles around the Bozo from Illinois..

Posted by: Roger in DC | September 9, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

: salliemae
So to get this straight you’re saying we should feel safer in NYC, LA, Detrit,Chicago than we do in say, Lexington, Ky , Baton Rouge or Dallas?
I live sort of south and have been prosperous all my life , made it ok with Carter , Reagan the Bush years and the Clintons. There are plenty of blue state refugees living in red states and doing fine.

Posted by: david | September 9, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

You can put a misogynist in a suit instead of a wife beater, but he’ll still say stupid things about women. First he calls his grandmother a “typical white person”, then he doesn’t even consider Hillary for Veep, and now this. I think he is a woman hater that wants to joins the good ole boys club.

Posted by: Dennis | September 9, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Now Obama is calling Palin a pig?!? So much for his campaign not being involved in sexist or personal attacks! How low will the Democrats go to win? Keep it up Obama! All you’re doing is guaranteeing a victory for McCain/Palin. Your childish attacks are not going unnoticed…and don’t even try to spin this as unintentional.
Posted by: Cory | Sep 9, 2008 7:16:26 PM
HE wasn’t calling Palin a pig he was calling the GOP that.Geez you people will put words in his mouth without any ounce of truth. McCain and Co. keep saying they are about change, where? What has McCain done that has not gone along with George Bush?

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Realistic: Thank God for you You’re one of the few people on here actually using your brain.
The rest of you, please read this book:
How Stupid Are We? by Rick Shenkman

Posted by: a THINKING Person | September 9, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

LIKE HILLARY SAID—-IF SHE CANNOT TAKE THE HEAT—GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN.

Posted by: rodney | September 9, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Still giving only half the story concerned. Leaving out the parts dealing with age & developmentally appropriate material. Dealing with teaching children about inappropriate touching.
Why do you lie so easily?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Mary Anne: “I am not being racist.”
Where have I heard that before…
Oh. I know. Racist talk always starts with “I’m not a racist, but …”
Looking through your posts, I noticed you had a very strange preference for the characters b l a c and k
Just an observation.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

Ryan C
Most of us have heard that before, no problems here but if he did say it in reference to Mrs. Palin then that mean wife of Obamas put him up to it!

Posted by: david | September 9, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

You know, Rick Davis does not seem real smart to me.
But, he’s playing the press like Colonel Tom Parker did when promoting Elvis.
With this flurry of allegations — and now insults — against Governor Palin, Charlie Gibson’s ratings are gonna blow through the roof.
Prediction:
Governor Palin calmly — and oozing with class — will respond rationally to the allegations.
Then the media will be falling all over each other, claiming the OTHER networks and newspapers were attacking her, but look how professionally she comported herself with Charlie Gibson.
I think the old media stereotype of being a drunk must have some substance to it.
How else do we explain their behavior?

Posted by: Harold | September 9, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

“It’s Drudges Headline with a picture of Palin under the words.”
Showing how dishonest Drudge and the Republican noise machine truly is.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

OBAMA is NOT GREAT FOR WOMEN
Barack Obama has a history of being involved in bitter campaigns in which his female opponents are threatened with law suits and race baiting, sexist attacks on their characters.
1. In Chicago Obama ruined opponent Alice Palmer’s campaign for Illinois State Senator when he employed crony lawyers to claim signatures on her petition were falsified. Before this Alice Palmer was once Obama’s mentor and had actually aided him in his career. She did not support him during the DNC presidential primary. She supported Hillary Clinton and was later silenced by blacks in Chicago as being a traitor to the black community. I know I am a Chicagoan.
2. During the DNC primary Obama and his minions of Obamabots waged a nasty race baiting campaign against Hillary Clinton. They accused Hillary of “pimping out” her daughter Chelsea and called her a racist. Hillary lost the election. Obama did nothing to stop his followers from spreading rumors of Racism against HRC.
3. Now that Obama has passed over Hillary for the VP spot, He has the audacity to come after Sarah Palin’s experience and attacks her in his stump speeches even though she is not the Pres. Nominee but McCain is. His minions are calling Palin an unfit mother who was chosen by McCain for her attractive looks and youth.
Obama is NOT FOR WOMEN. HIS POLICIES MAY TELL YOU THAT BUT HIS ACTIONS SAY OTHERWISE.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

That’s not change,” Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said of what Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is offering.
“You know, you can put lipstick on a pig,” Obama said, “but it’s still a pig.”
How does this have anything whatsoever to do with Palin????? McCain is for everything GWB has done to destroy this country. He’s right about the GOP. You can dress it up but you can’t take it anywhere.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

MCCAINS SAYS HE WILL GO AGAINST REPUB PARTY——ALL THIS WHEN IT IS REPUB LOBBYIST THAT ARE GIVING HIM MONEY—WHAT A FAIRY TAIL.MCCAIN LIFE IS A LIE—BUT HE IS GOOD AT USING WOMEN

Posted by: rodney | September 9, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

he was too dumb to realize people would make the connection between his statement and hers or he was too dumb to realize there would be an instant backlash. Either way, this is flat out sexist BS.

Posted by: Mick | September 9, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

I just sent $500.00 to the RNC. Keep it up Obama.

Posted by: Kitty | September 9, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Now Samantha is from Chicago.
Next week she will have grown up with Obama.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

“What color did Obama write his memoirs in?”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

When you see the video of him saying it, well it’s even worse. I think Obami just decided to end his run for President. We’ve known what kind of guy he is all year, when will liberals learn?

Posted by: Lon | September 9, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Republicans have really gone off the deep end with Psycho Palin.
My 78 yr old self described Rockefeller Republican parents were excited about the Palin pick, for about a minute and then they found out she is a right wing Armageddon craving extremist.
And now they even question McCain’s mental stability and Faux vetting process. McCain isn’t a very good executive…eh?
I been saying for a long time that McCain is not sane and therefore not qualified to be President. Any doubts now?

Posted by: McInsane/Psycho Palin 08 | September 9, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

who cares if its an old expression. It’s a known thing Palin has been using that Pitbull/Hockey Mom Lipstick joke and it’s obvious that Obama’s smugness is coming through. Maybe this is how you about her in private, but in public? You may as well throw the election, because it looks like that what he’s trying to do anyway.

Posted by: Cee | September 9, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

The Dems are the one that created political correctness and now it’s coming back to haunt them :)
I almost feel bad for Obama, almost…

Posted by: Tony | September 9, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Now you are talking darling!

Posted by: yoye777 | September 9, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Posted by: Russell4America | Sep 9, 2008 7:30:15 PM
There is intelligent life on this board. Thank you for that post.The Republican thugs will make up anything.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

You go Obama! Gov. Palin opened that door on “lipstick” (both the use of the word and in the sexist context under which she used it) when she used the word in her acceptance speech. Good for you, Obama!

Posted by: Maria | September 9, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Using my exact phraseology. Obama doesn’t look desperate. On the contrary, he looks pretty calm and collected vs. McCain’s hail mary pick in Palin. Wait til the new car sheen wears off Palin. Wait til Biden schools her in the debates. Wait til Obama picks apart McCain’s terrible record of voting with Bush.
McCain = The Same.
Palin = Two bit political hack with no skillz.
Just wait, to everyone it will be real obvious real soon.
McCain’s “Bounce” will be a distant memory in two weeks. Mark my words.

Posted by: STILTON | September 9, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

Good for Obama, she put it out there.

Posted by: LOL | September 9, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

“Wait til Biden schools her in the debates.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

3 A.M. text, to smite Hillary.
Lipstick on a pig, to smite Palin.
Is Obama running for High School Student Union or for POTUS? And, this guy wants Americans to take him seriously and vote for him? Sorry, he lacks even the slightest maturity level, let alone experience, to ever warrant my vote.

Posted by: Stacy | September 9, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Obama’s mysogyny (hatred or contempt of women) will lose him this election; just look at how he and his campaign treated Hillary. BUT alluding to Palin as a pig is contemptible.
Black people flock to Obama; it’s only natural that women flock to Palin.
And through it all, Palin is going to be a formidable opponent to Obama et al.

Posted by: William | September 9, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

You know what’s even funnier?
Palin called herself a “pit bull with lipstick”. Remember?
What’s another name for a female dog?
a B.tch.
She didn’t seem to care about that last week.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

It’s a common expression… McCain used it back in the day:
McCain criticized Democratic contenders for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was “eerily reminiscent” of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the 1990s.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” he said of her proposal.

Posted by: Sarah | September 9, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Obama needs to get to the point…and fast. I supported Clinton during the primaries and I will vote for Obama/Biden in November. I am just unconvinced that enough people will do the same. Palin has presented Obama with the perfect opportunity to show us all that he is ready to lead (without ANY surrogates). Petty digs about lipstick just aren’t going to garner confidence in the masses.
My advice…move past Palin and get over yourself. Start talking about the interest rate on my student loans, tax relief, and health care. This is what matters — who cares if they stole the message of “change?!” It is an abstract concept anyway. Get back to the “yes we can” message…it is time to rally the troops.

Posted by: Sharon | September 9, 2008, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

You mean the Pit Bull and her cult are whining? Surprise, surprise.

Posted by: LOL | September 9, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Doesn’t Barack realize he sounds like he’s call Palin a pig? I know it’s an old cliche, the whole lipstick on a pig thing, but millions of women will think he chose it intentionally to slyly call Palin a pig. Who knows, they might be right.
Between the new poll numbers indicating at 20% swing with white women, Uncle Joe saying a Palin win would be a “backward step for women” and this pig quote, it’s been a rough day for Barack Jefferson Obama with the female demographic.

Posted by: Woody | September 9, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Even if Obama wasn’t referring to Palin, that was an incredibly foolish comment to make given the current atmosphere of sexism.
Bad form.

Posted by: Bill Mitchell | September 9, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

OBama is an empty suit. The Dems are running scared.

Posted by: Joey | September 9, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Obama’s sexism is just revealing, isn’t it. Well, good-bye Obama. You won’t get my vote. And I thought you were allabout “new politics”. Calling Palin a “pig” is really, really raising the level of political discourse, you hypocritical moron.

Posted by: Emily | September 9, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

This is what happens when you take away Obama’s teleprompter. It’s a gaffe-fest just waiting to happen.
Can’t wait for the debates.

Posted by: Bill Mitchell | September 9, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

McCain has used the EXACT same phrase when discussing one Hillary Clinton’s policies.
If you think Obama was being sexist here (I sure don’t), then McCain is too.

Posted by: Curtland | September 9, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Obama.
Sinking.
To.
A.
New.
Low.
Pathetic!!
McCain-Palin ’08
Hillary ’12

Posted by: USVet | September 9, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

Wait until they let Palin start doing interviews and people find out she’s not the genius they think she is. An old man and a semi pretty face aren’t going to get your bills paid or put gas in your car.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

What? I’m a democrat and a WOMAN. He’s lost my vote!!!!!!

Posted by: Rosemary | September 9, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Marc Ambinder: McCain criticized Democratic contenders for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was “eerily reminiscent” of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the 1990s.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” [McCain]said of [Clinton's] proposal.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” [McCain]said of [Clinton's] proposal.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” [McCain]said of [Clinton's] proposal.

Posted by: S. McVic. | September 9, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Ya know, I’ve never liked McCain because he’s always been too liberal for me. Even his pick of Palin is designed to hoodwink the base. In fact, I wasn’t even going to vote for McCain, but was going to vote for Chuck Baldwin of the COnstitution Party. However, seeing the shrill, snarky and elitist jabs taken at Palin since her pick has changed my mind (and my wife as well). Thanks MSM – you made up our minds. Chalk two more votes up for McCain/Palin.
Oh, and guess what? You have no idea how many people you’ve PO’d with your snide little comments. Those people are now solidly in the tank for McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Johnny Reb | September 9, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Hillary was Right.
Obama is unelectable.

Posted by: turkeydance | September 9, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

McCain/Palin/Bush/Cheney – You can put lipstick on a pig and it is still a pig.

Posted by: No Change | September 9, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Oh, come on, Jake. Politicians have been using that expression for decades. It is well known what it means. If somoene wants to pretend it means something else, that’s their own problem.

Posted by: jock59801 | September 9, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

wow, pig comment was bad enough but this guy chooses Joe Biden as his VP and he talks about change?
What a joke!

Posted by: Anne | September 9, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Your done Obama, go back to Chicago and find a job with your hoodlum buddies

Posted by: J Noble | September 9, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

What’s his beef?
HE’S the one that didn’t pick Hillary.

Posted by: W J Clinton | September 9, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

This is Obama’s “Howard Dean” moment! I thought Joe Biden was bad today but this takes the cake!!!

Posted by: Bel | September 9, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Watching obama implode is fun.

Posted by: JohnA | September 9, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

So much for the classy Mr. Obama. If someone called him such a name there’s be cries of raciscm from the left.

Posted by: renee | September 9, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

How is talking about he GOP being sexist? How do you rocket scientists get that out of what he said?

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Wow!
The pig statement is the current Drudge headline. If it stays there overnight, we can expect this to development into a PIG-GATE.
Heckuva job, Obama!

Posted by: bebe | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

He wasn’t calling he a pig people, calm down.
McCain used the EXACT same line when referring to a Hillary Clinton policy last year.

Posted by: Curtis | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN….
I present to you “OBAMA’S HOWARD DEAN MOMENT”
HEAWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Scott | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Might I add big lying pig? She has her snout so far in the pork barrel its sickening. America will see through the lies.

Posted by: James | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Good Lord. Now we can’t use any expressions with the word lipstick. Got that?
Watching Republicans scream sexism is funny enough. Watching it on hair trigger is hilarious. What happened to my party?
Grow up.

Posted by: Give me a break | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Thanks Obama–now we know what really lurks inside that head of yours…

Posted by: Dave | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

He was referring to the McCain campaign. It’s an old expression. You can take it to mean whatever you want, but in the end, your bunched up shorts won’t make it any less a non-issue. Are you saying McCain isn’t a pig? I think McCain/Bush are two pigs in a blanket. (And hey, if Palin can play the game, then I’m sorry for her – but the truth is, I think she’s tough enough to withstand this.)

Posted by: Irishspacemonk | September 9, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Just when you thought that it couldn’t get any more interesting: Republican feminists and Democrat sexists… WOW!
Does the Harvard educated constitutional lawyer expect anyone to believe that he was not throwing an off-handed dagger at his opponant’s back? Hit and run!
Many of the pro-Obamans say fair is fair… I agree, it’s politics. But puleez… is this the best he can do? Kind of chicken sh!t, if you ask me. It’s one thing to attack… it’s another to look like a petulant and spurned woman while doing it!
Hillary had more cajones during the primaries and now Palin seems to be demonstrating the same strength… all the while Obama is having a hissy fit!

Posted by: Diamond Lou | September 9, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Obama Did Not Call Sarah Palin A Pig
09 Sep 2008 07:06 pm
The first McCain truthsquadding telephone call is taking place right now, and ex-MA Gov. Jane Swift is complaining about an idiom Barack Obama used today:
Obama poked fun of McCain and Palin’s new “change” mantra.
“You can put lipstick on a pig,” he said as the crowd cheered. “It’s still a pig.”
“You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still gonna stink.”
“We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”
Suddenly, common analogies are sexist?
The McCain campaign has little respect for Obama, but they don’t think he is stupid. And the only way one can conclude that Obama meant to refer to Gov. Sarah Palin as a pig is to have concluded that Obama is as dumb as a doornail.
Obama is fond of this particular phrase. To wit, in 2007:
‘I think that both General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker are capable people who have been given an impossible assignment,’ Sen. Barack Obama said yesterday in a telephone interview. ‘George Bush has given a mission to General Petraeus, and he has done his best to try to figure out how to put lipstick on a pig.
And so is John McCain. Speaking about Hillary Clinton….
McCain criticized Democratic contenders for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was “eerily reminiscent” of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the 1990s.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” he said of her proposal.

Posted by: SD Patriot | September 9, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Obama just lost my vote with the pig comment.
His true colors are shining through.

Posted by: Jillian | September 9, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

EEEEEEEEEEEEEAAHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!

Posted by: BillC | September 9, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Thanks, Obama. Your comments have convinced me to make a contribution to the McCain campaign!

Posted by: Frank | September 9, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Wow. This is the last straw for me.
Count me in as one of the 20% of white women who have shifted way from Obama to McCain/Palin.
There is no way a man of Obama’s intelligence could say this without realizing the connotation with Sarah Palin.
I’ve had it.
Posted by: Sam39 | Sep 9, 2008 7:50:48 PM
Oh for God’s sake, you never were going to vote for him anyway, so quit acting so appalled at something he didn’t say about Palin.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Wow.. Fake outrage from the Republicans. What a surprise.

Posted by: VictorME1980 | September 9, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Obama’s experience is showing! Is this what we are to expect from him if he wins?
PEOPLE, don’t drink the Obama-Aid! It tastes sweet going down but then it sours in your stomach!!!

Posted by: Michael | September 9, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Obama Did Not Call Sarah Palin A Pig
09 Sep 2008 07:06 pm
The first McCain truthsquadding telephone call is taking place right now, and ex-MA Gov. Jane Swift is complaining about an idiom Barack Obama used today:
Obama poked fun of McCain and Palin’s new “change” mantra.
“You can put lipstick on a pig,” he said as the crowd cheered. “It’s still a pig.”
“You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still gonna stink.”
“We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”
Suddenly, common analogies are sexist?
The McCain campaign has little respect for Obama, but they don’t think he is stupid. And the only way one can conclude that Obama meant to refer to Gov. Sarah Palin as a pig is to have concluded that Obama is as dumb as a doornail.
Obama is fond of this particular phrase. To wit, in 2007:
‘I think that both General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker are capable people who have been given an impossible assignment,’ Sen. Barack Obama said yesterday in a telephone interview. ‘George Bush has given a mission to General Petraeus, and he has done his best to try to figure out how to put lipstick on a pig.
And so is John McCain. Speaking about Hillary Clinton….
McCain criticized Democratic contenders for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was “eerily reminiscent” of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the 1990s.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” he said of her proposal.

Posted by: SD Patriot | September 9, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

So this is Barry’s version of change we can believe in?? Last week Barry complained of the “vitriol” in Palin’s speech. It’s the same “vitriol” that we’ve heard from the Democrats for the past 8 years. Democrats only legitimize President’s when they win. It’s all about power – nothing more.
Barry has no record of accomplishment – so let’s pretend we’re all stupid and insult the American people with ridiculous comments. Let’s tell Barry no to socialism, no to liberal judges and no to people who associate themselves with pastors that hate America.
Keep doing what you’re doing Barry – McCain/Palin ’08.

Posted by: Conservative Thinker | September 9, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

With a comment like that Obama should step down as the Democratic nominee and from the Senate.
If there was a slur towards him in the same way I would want that person to also step down.
He was the person that was going to bring people together – He is not showing his ability with that comment

Posted by: Bill in San Diego | September 9, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Wow, Obama is losing it.

Posted by: Cynthia | September 9, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

The Obama camp is frantically trying anything and everything to try and get traction while they slide further and further from the truth and subsequent victory.
Obama could loose the election. He knows it, and it shows!

Posted by: KoKoMo | September 9, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

It’s all about the show.
Let’s keep everything in perspective.
John Kerry received 59 million votes. Turnout will be greater by Democrats in 2008.
The Economy, The War, Women’s rights all slant to the party not in power.
Creating a media event with a pro-life newbie is not going to gain any votes that Bush didn’t already receive in 2004. It actually will have the opposite effect for fiscally responsible and socially moderate Republicans and Independents. There is no measurable percentage of supporters of Hillary that would vote for the other ticket.
Let the circus come to town. Let the media hit their numbers.
And we’ll all toast an Obama/Biden victory in November.

Posted by: Playing by their rules. | September 9, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

He never said Palin was a pig in lipstick he said what the Republicans offered is a pig in lipstick, quite different if you ask me. Very unfair of Drudge to show a picture of Palin with the quote. Distortion is quite the popular approach these days

Posted by: Jay | September 9, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

obama said he was not going to be bullied. apparently he simply wants to play the bully. most of the jabs by palin were simply retorts to obamas claims. the amount of nasty behavior towards palin knows no bounds.

Posted by: bill | September 9, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Senator Obama needs to maintain this type of pressure on McCain/Palin, at least until he falls 20 points behind in he polls.

Posted by: Helen | September 9, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

AGAIN: McCain has said the same thing about Hillary’s policies!
IF YOU ARE USING THIS TO CLAIM BARACK IS SEXIST, THEN MCCAIN IS TOO!

Posted by: Curtland | September 9, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

“…lipstick on a pig?” “…smells like fish?” I think he’s losing it. Watching his Messiah Complex explode is kind of fun.
“…smells like a fish?” Did he really say that?! Wow! What a classy guy!

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | September 9, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

If TWO kids wear you and Michelle out…
Better not try to deal with 300 million of us.

Posted by: Reaganart | September 9, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Thanks Obama,
You have just about pissed off 3/4
of the women in this country.
Good Luck to you MR Change artist!

Posted by: mosie | September 9, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Hey J. Perhaps you need to look at your position. There is nothing about Obama or a democrat that puts money in your pocket. You might not have learned this yet but their philosophy is that you can’t be trusted with your money. That they can better serve you by giving it to them and running it through a huge bureacracy.. In their minds, you are not smart enough to make your own decisions. Judging from your comment, they might be right. I suspect you will figure it out in the next 20 years. Good luck!

Posted by: M | September 9, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

It’s somewhat amusing, but mostly pathetic to hear his hangers-on defend this latest gaffe.
I still remember how he got away with flipping Hillary the bird during that one speech in North Carolina and absolutely no one in the media reported it.
That gesture was just as blatant and deliberate as this remark about the pig.
It’s about time people finally come to their senses about this phony.

Posted by: Lee | September 9, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Obama is a true liberal slob..just another loser.

Posted by: Paul | September 9, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

UNREAL!! What a real clown! Remember at the democratic convention when he said he wasnt going to do this? haha – that lasted about a week. All he knows how to do is sling mud and dance around policy questions.
Congrats Obama, you’ve managed to yet again avoid telling us how your going to make a change, or any change you’ve ever made.
You just convinced my to donate another $100 to the GOP.

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

I was going to vote for McCain but have switched to Obama. Thanks for all of the flowers and cards. My lobotomy went very well.

Posted by: jamesintexas | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

This is silly

Posted by: Jacob | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

My God, Obama is a lowlife. That was a lowlife comment if I ever heard one. And there’s no use defending his comments as ambiguous because it’s clear he was referring to Mrs. Palin. All I can say is that if the polls are now tied and he keeps up his arrogance he will surely lose the election. Common sense voters of either party won’t stand for such comments. It may be OK to talk like that on some MTV reality program but voters expect more class from a presidential candidate — regardless of their party affiliation.

Posted by: Ralph | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Actually, considering the subtle references to each others’ positions and comments during this campaign, this one is pretty slick. I actually got a kick out of it.
However, the only trick Senator Obama has left in his kit bag is to continue to try to tie Senator McCain with President Bush…I think that is desperation surfacing…he sees the light at the end of the tunnel and it’s McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

OBAMA IS THE MAN OF CHANGE. AND HE IS CHANGING INTO BIDEN.

Posted by: jet | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

I don’t think Obama meant anything by the remark. Let’s face it, everyone unthinkingly uses tired old sayings every once in awhile.
I mean, c’mon people, let’s call a spade a spade.
…..Oops, my bad.

Posted by: McCain Rules | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Way to go Barack. I just sent McCain/Palin another check.

Posted by: John Oliver | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

So John McCain used it too?
When referring to Hillary?
Oh my.
What should Hillary’s supporters do now?

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

The saying Obama used is an historical saying. People use this analogy all the time. “You can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig”. You have to be somewhat intelligent, however, to realize it is an analogy and has nothing to do with Sarah Palin whatsoever. The saying has been around far longer than either Sarah Palin OR John McCain have been alive. Period.

Posted by: Eric | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Just an “old” expression… hmmm, so are a lot of others that now raise the hackles of many “oppressed” groups – I do believe this is a double standard.

Posted by: Chuck B | September 9, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

before too long Obama will say “oh I mispoke”

Posted by: mt | September 9, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Obama should withdraw from the Presidential race because of calling Palin a “pig”. It is a disgrace. He could have used any cliche, but he picked that one. Obama is low class.

Posted by: NoBama | September 9, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I repeat:
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,”
-John McCain, in reference to Hillary’s health care proposal.
Somebody tell me how these situations are different.

Posted by: brian | September 9, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

People can try to explain this away as Obama really not making a remark about Palin but even with that excuse, it was stupid and arrogant Nice going Obama, as a woman I am appalled. No way Obama did not know about Gov. Palin’s remark about hockey moms/lipstick. He meant it all right, just trying to now cover up his slipped remark. He had better stick to his teleprompter and written speeches. On his own, he is not too good.

Posted by: teine girl | September 9, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

He just blew it big time.

Posted by: Kristal | September 9, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

The democrat party needs to keep this up. A few more statements like this and there will be NO women voting for them. Looks like the party of slavery, the KKK, Jim Crow, Bull Connor, race baiting (tell me, again, why black people vote for this party), and anti-religious zealots is again out of control and cannot conatin their anger and resentment. B.O. is folding like a beach chair.

Posted by: Mike N | September 9, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

well all this political hay is all fine and nice. however I as a taxpayer/voter want to know what these clowns are going to do to stop the hemmoraging of the economy, bring back jobs, provide for the counties infastructure, get waste, graft and expense under control. Fix our broken education system and win two wars with the same American pride and can-do that we once had. Is Obama trying to cost himself votes becasue I’m not voting for him now.

Posted by: mauricio | September 9, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

You stay classy, Barack Obama.

Posted by: Justin | September 9, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Hey J. Perhaps you need to look at your position. There is nothing about Obama or a democrat that puts money in your pocket. You might not have learned this yet but their philosophy is that you can’t be trusted with your money. That they can better serve you by giving it to them and running it through a huge bureacracy.. In their minds, you are not smart enough to make your own decisions. Judging from your comment, they might be right. I suspect you will figure it out in the next 20 years. Good luck!
Posted by: M | Sep 9, 2008 7:57:06 PM
The Republicans have done a bang up job the last 8 years. Biggest deficit in history, skyrocketing gas prices, mortgage foreclosures. Yeah I want to vote for more of that. You people who think you know everything are the ones that keep voting these idiots in office.
That sure shows the intelligence of the average voter when they vote GWB in office twice. No thanks! I’ll take my chances with Obama.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Wow. I can’t beliee he said that. Obama lost the election tonight folks. Not literally, but looking back November 6 this was the begining. Game. Set Match

Posted by: NH Dad | September 9, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

If someone had made remarks like this in a context where it could be inferred to apply to Hillary Clinton they would no longer be able to get a job anywhere on this planet. That this disgusting, sexist remark is being soft-pedaled by the press shows the incredible double standard that the national press is applying to this contest. If Palin were to make a remark as insensitive about Obama’s ethnicity it would be front-paged by the Macacas in the press until election day, just like they did to George Allen.

Posted by: skep41 | September 9, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Obama will probably demand Palin to start wearing a burqa. He really is a shameful character. Obama calls women “sweetie”, pays his female staffers less McCain does, disrespected Hillary Clinton. I got some lipstick Obama, and I got a place for you to put it, you creep!

Posted by: Karen | September 9, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Obama is imploding. This is fun to watch

Posted by: John X | September 9, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

obama said he was not going to be bullied. apparently he simply wants to play the bully. most of the jabs by palin were simply retorts to obamas claims. the amount of nasty behavior towards palin knows no bounds.
GIVE ME A BREAK. DID YOU WATCH AND HEAR THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION. HOW THIS WOMAN ATTACKED OBAMA???? HOW DARE THEY? OBAMA’S A GENTLEMAN AND WHOMEVER SUGGESTS OTHERWISE IS NOT PAYING ATTENTION.

Posted by: dodo | September 9, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

How about Palins’s lies that she sold her plane on Ebay for a profit? A) she did not sell the plane on Ebay B) She sold the plane for a loss. Stop lieing Republicans!!!!

Posted by: George | September 9, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Senator Obama needs to maintain this type of pressure on McCain/Palin, at least until he falls 20 points behind in he polls.

Posted by: Helen | September 9, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Whatever happened to doing away with politics as usual? Did that go the same way as the promise for public financing?

Posted by: Quizzical | September 9, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I’m happy Obama is going after them hard, just take another look at the attacks made during the RNC… One after another they attempted to tear Obama apart… If you can’t take it, then don’t dish it…

Posted by: chad | September 9, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

Wow! What a complete idiot! No way to win votes this way…The great Obamassiah is on is way down…

Posted by: darwin orpilla | September 9, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

SKEP41: Someone did. McCain used the EXACT SAME LINE when referring to a Hillary Clinton policy about a year ago.
Where was all of your righteous indignation them?

Posted by: Curtland | September 9, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

Barry the community organizer is adept at shuck and jive street talk and is really cool most of the time. But when the heat is on:Will he be able to rise to a higher level in this political contest? Doubtful!

Posted by: Dixon | September 9, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

My first thought–once I picked my jaw off the floor–was to remember how outright misogynistic urban black culture is and yeah, Obama just let loose his inner rapper. Lipstick. On. A. Pig. That’s what he thinks of uppity broads, huh? Well, we’ll just have to show him what we think of two-faced misogynists come november…
Lipstick
On.
A.
Pig.
Great show of respect for 52% of the population…
Lets see the mainstream media try to spin this one. Cause, of course, McCain wears the lipstick on the republican ticket, right?
Lipstick.
On.
Pig.
And its been barely a week.
Wonder what they’ll think of next…

Posted by: fjtorres | September 9, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I’m voting for McCain, and I’m not offended in the slightest by the comment. Grow up people, it’s a figure of speech. Issues should win this election, not high-school rhetoric.

Posted by: Shaun | September 9, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

I am completely and utterly stunned that Obama would make such a disgusting comment toward Sarah Palin – to call a women, a mother – a pig!!?? He has a wife and two daughters and this is how he treats women??- how absolutely DISGRACEFUL – he should drop out of this race.

Posted by: Heidi Barclay | September 9, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Read my lipstick Obama — No Votes for YOU!

Posted by: Karen | September 9, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Yes “putting lipstick on a pig” is a common convention but Barak can’t just back away from it. The impression the saying in this context leaves, is that the “pig with lipstick” is the “pit bull with lipstick” and “the pitbull with lipstick” is Sarah Palin. Therefore “the pig with lipstick” is Sarah Palin.
Barak is a Lawyer and he wouldn’t have said it if he didn’t want people to make the logical inference.

Posted by: BillC | September 9, 2008, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Now it shows Sarah Palin is the greatest threat to the entire liberal hold on our country.
She is cleaning house and doing housewife budgeting!
The change is not what more federal government can do. The change is for us to take our country back, to be free to think and restore it!

Posted by: Kathleen | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

I see Karl Rove’s little racist, idiots are out in full force. You people disgust me with your narrow minded comments.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Certainly a man of small stature.

Posted by: Jake | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Is Palin still be sequestered by the Republicans? What does she have to hide?

Posted by: Margie | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

I hope Obama attacks her more, not less.
Keep em coming Obama, I knew that sharp tounge was going to come out sooner or later.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

As someone who has long been opposed to Obama, I’m willing to concede that there’s a possibility it was just a gaffe and he was talking about policy, not Sarah Palin.
On the other hand… hey, liberals, now you know what it’s like to have every single last word you -ever- say be reconstructed as “racist codespeak”.

Posted by: Qwinn | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

“I’m happy Obama is going after them hard, just take another look at the attacks made during the RNC… One after another they attempted to tear Obama apart… If you can’t take it, then don’t dish it… ”
Nice talking points. Now what did they say chad?
Nevermind……..

Posted by: seeitoldyouso | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

How is this different than if McCain had referred to Obama with the N word?

Posted by: Gene Williams | September 9, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Obama:
Those nails you keep hammering away at belong to your own coffin.
Your sexist attacks started with Hillary and these types of thug attacks may work in Chicago but Nationally you can expect another drop in the polls.
This Democrat voter is now firmly in the McCain/Palin column and so is my family.
YOU SIR ARE NOT PRESIDENTIAL!

Posted by: Kimberly Pittsburgh, PA | September 9, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Since McCain used the exact same expression against one of Hillary Clinton’s policies, can we call it a wash?
After that, can we grow up?

Posted by: jock59801 | September 9, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

8 years of failure by the republicans are more important people! Vote for change!

Posted by: Meredith | September 9, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Sounds like Obama has a attitude towards white women.
He lost my vote and respect. Grow up, Obama, name calling is for children.

Posted by: White & Proud | September 9, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

MCCain and Palin ALL THE WAY…Obama is just a big windbag full of amazing words with no map to get there….No thanks…Worlds Biggest HYPE

Posted by: Kris | September 9, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

I’ve never been prouder to be an evangelical, conservative, white, straight, pro-life male.

Posted by: Bob | September 9, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

It’s obvious that Obama et al are running scared screaming from the backlash. I am laughing my butt off.
The democrats are stuck playing Barbies in camelot.They are trying to relive a misty memory that was never real by electing a new Kennedy. How pathetic is that?

Posted by: Ken Weaver | September 9, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

McCain has used the line against Hillary Clinton.
Want to throw insults at McCain now?
No? I thought not you lying hypocrits.

Posted by: Curtland | September 9, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

The lame defense the Obama people are putting up for this is claiming that McCain making the same comment regarding Hillary Clinton’s health care plan was equivalent.
This doesn’t come close to passing the smell test.
Sarah Palin’s ad lib joke during her speech was probably the most memorable line of both conventions and it happened just a short time ago. It’s just not credible that Obama would be oblivious to that when he made this comment.
To Obama people: Come clean. This is unacceptable. Stop carrying his water.

Posted by: Sam39 | September 9, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Okay we can add not liking women to his long list….sweetie.

Posted by: Dev | September 9, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

This is sooo funny. Barry Obama keeps firing torpedoes into his own campaign. He has no class, fakes the funk on change, and thinks the same smear tactics that got him elected in Chicago will work on the national stage. What a knucklehead. I can’t wait until November to see all you sycophantic Obama supporters weep WHEN your messiah loses.

Posted by: Sal | September 9, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

brian:
The difference is that Hillary didn’t stand up the week before McCain’s analogy was made, in a speech that was watched by millions and millions of people, and make a joke about “lipstick.”
If McCain had made some reference to a pig in a pantsuit, he would have been toast.

Posted by: Lee | September 9, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Excuse me, Senator …
your desperation is showing.

Posted by: Hmmmmm | September 9, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

This guy is self-defeating, really.. He’s got no one but himself to blame for his ultimate loss.

Posted by: Dave | September 9, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Point in case: Obama, yet again, continues to sling mud at the other camp as another great example of how he shows us he will “Change” Capitol Hill. Once again, going against his word to not play dirty politics by sway from answering any question directly – well, I guess that is considered “change.” Unfortunately, this is the exact reason I cannot vote for him. He will say one thing and do another…oh! another example his campaign “Change!” (And hasn’t he always voted in agreement with his party in the past? How will that be a “Change?”)

Posted by: "Don't blame me, I voted for the other." | September 9, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Take the gloves off and don’t let UP. Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: JOHN | September 9, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

“It is this world, a world where cruise ships throw away more food in a day than most residents of Port-au-Prince see in a year, where white folks’ greed runs a world in need, apartheid in one hemisphere, apathy in another hemisphere…That’s the world! On which hope sits!”
-Barack Obama

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

I have been following the Palin buzz the last week and here is what I see.
The wheels are coming off the Obama bus and things are spiriling out of control for the Democrats. They have seen that attacking Palin backfired badly and have tried to pull back. but expectations are set. People expect the Dems to slime Palin from here on out, and while I believe that Obama’s comment was not aimed at the Governor, almost everyone will assume it was. That, combined with the bottom-feeder left spreading the most vile lies and slander about Palin makes it almost impossible for Obama to take this “Insult” back. He will probably apologize, but the damage is already done. I expect that now, more women will switch and vote McCain.
The Big O’ Just blew it B.A.D.
Yodan

Posted by: Yodan | September 9, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Wow. Real classy candidate.

Posted by: Wayne | September 9, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

It’s about time Obama started fighting back against the Republican machine. The GOP has no shame and Obama getting a little dirty lets me know that he’s willing to do what is necessary. He just said what most Dems already think about Palin.

Posted by: Bob Marley | September 9, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Hey dodo. I watched the Republican Convention. Sarah Palin carved up Barry like I’ve never seen before in political history. She showed Barry who wears the pants in this election and exposed him for the fraud he is. I guess the truth hurts for all you bleeding liberals out there.
Barry – The REAL STINKING FISH in this election. McCain/Palin’08

Posted by: Conservative Thinker | September 9, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Whatever – I make very good money and am in an industry that never has enough workers – I’ll be fine with whoever wins.
But if I was making less than $100k a year and in an industry where my job wasn’t as secure I would be scared to death of McCain winning – just look at his initiatives – and the Bush eight years on the economy – LOL.
Good Luck to all of those who live pay check to pay check!

Posted by: Rob | September 9, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Question from some liberal: “I repeat:
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,”
-John McCain, in reference to Hillary’s health care proposal.
Somebody tell me how these situations are different.”
Answer to some liberal …
Politicians and their campaigns keep close watch on the exact words that their opponents use. Since Sarah referred to lipstick on a pit bull, showing tenacity, then lipstick was in the thoughts of todays political readers. And obviously in the thoughts of McCain Palin opponents (Specifically Obama). So yes, in McCains case he was indeed refering to Hillary’s health plan and not Hillary, since at the time, there was no discussion of Hillary and lipstick of any kind.
So, then was Obama purposely trying to associate Palin with being a pig? Of course he was. His idiot days are numbered. He has called the female vice presidential candidate a PIG and he should not be given an ounce more of respect or support. This is not the first time that Obama has looked down on and talked down on females in general.
Speaking of pigs, Obama fits the description of a Male Cheauvenist pig to a T.
We seriously dont need an Obama nation at this point in America.

Posted by: KMichaels | September 9, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

To those who are surprised by this garbage coming out of Obama’s mouth, get real. Would he be saying this about a black woman? I don’t think so… Not only is he a Marxist, but a sexist. Kind of goes together…

Posted by: JC | September 9, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

That’s it… I’m voting for Obama.
He is smart.

Posted by: ex-repub | September 9, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Keep up the attacks on Palin! The Dems have their panties in a wad over a VP selection that is the very definition of Washington outsider.
Do you know why nobody is attacking Joe Biden? It’s because he’s irrelevant. THE ONE would surely like a do-over on that decision.

Posted by: DblDekrPekr | September 9, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Obama on Hillary,
“Periodically, when she is feeling down the claws come out”
Women stand up!
McCain 2008
Hillary 2012

Posted by: Theresa | September 9, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

If McCain had characterized Obama’s secretiveness regarding Ayers and Wright as “Trying to get the fried chicken recipe from Colonel Sanders”, or described Obama’s Marxist environmental programs as “Like watermelons…Green on the outside, Red on the inside”, would that be simply using a “turn of the phrase” and would McCain not be attacked by libs? This is a major gaffe from Obama.

Posted by: Dave | September 9, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I don’t think Obama meant anything by the remark. Let’s face it, everyone unthinkingly uses tired old sayings every once in awhile.
I mean, c’mon people, let’s call a spade a spade.
…..Oops, my bad.
Posted by: McCain Rules | Sep 9, 2008 7:58:35 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Obama knew exactly what he was doing. He planned it all out. He is a master of subtle phrases. Look how he attacked Bill Clinton for his innocent statements as racist. Obama is no fool.

Posted by: DemocratNoMore2 | September 9, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

What a sexist comment by the choosen one

Posted by: friends of ron mexico | September 9, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Saw the video….such a convenient pause to let the audience catch the inference and the smirk….oh yeah he knew what he was doing. Bad, Bad choice oh Chosen One.

Posted by: Wilf | September 9, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

obama was talking about bush/mccain – just because drudge crafts a drama by putting the headline under a picture of Palin all the racists and haters come here, skip the article and go straight to making hateful comments. do some research

Posted by: skisginer | September 9, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Every body calm down. It was just an old expression. Lets call a spade a spade it was harmless….or was it?

Posted by: slick top | September 9, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

The beloved Messaiah who transcends politics and is The Great Uniter is now calling Sarah Palin a pig.
Lovely….

Posted by: Darryl | September 9, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Wow, the left is falling apart. they want a woman but only if its one of the liberal leaning ones. so much for feminism and womens rights. If anyone out there thinks that obama/biden is more mainstream than mccain/palin you are really kidding yourselves

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

The question is, what does Obama do now? Ignore it? Apologize? Defend himself? Ignoring it allows his detractors to define his statements. Apologizing makes him look guilty or at the very least, weak. Defending himself just keeps these comments front and center. Talk about painting yourself into a corner!

Posted by: Darth Bald | September 9, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

McCain was talking about a health care proposal, Obama was making reference directly about Sarah. Notice the way the people he was talking to chuckled as soon as he said it. They got it. He knew it. Obama is stupid, to say the least.

Posted by: dukas | September 9, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Sick and disgusting to call a mother of five a pig. The roar from the crowd tells me *they* knew exactly what B. Hussein Obama was doing…remember folks, B. Hussein Obama is a mysogynist, just like the rest of the liberals, as long as the woman they attack is a conservative! Watch Palin rip Obama a new one! She’ll let it slide off like water off a duck’s back. Good try, Barry, you’re desperate! Wait till you get your ass handed to you in November! The conservatives have been ignited by Palin, a TRUE conservative.

Posted by: ukko | September 9, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Unbelievable! Is this how Harvard graduates talk? Oh my my…..

Posted by: Daniel Hsu | September 9, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Thanks Barack, you told us who you are.
locker room talk, by “the boys” whether they got her or didn’t…Yikes…wash your mouth out. By the way, DIDN’T

Posted by: patty,detroit | September 9, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Nobody has ever associated lipstick with Hillary.
Thus, McCain could use “lipstick on a pig” comments about Hillary’s health plans and nobody would associate the comment with Hillary herself
One of Sarah’s more memorable comments at the convention (and after) involved lipstick and hockey moms.
Thus, Obama’s inference is much more directly aimed at Serah herself.

Posted by: Maryann | September 9, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Is there proof that Obama said this (like video?) If so, he just lost me and millions of other female voters. Has anyone actually heard the audio. Did he really say this?

Posted by: Brianna J | September 9, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Any white woman who can think for herself won’t find what he said about the GOP will not find this offensive. Show me where he was talking about Palin because I just don’t see it.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Over the past few days, Obama’s word choice has sounded increasingly desperate. He has asked if McCain thinks the American people are ‘stupid’ — sounds a little 2nd grade-ish. He has said that McCain is shameless, a liar — you know… of “liar, liar pants on fire” fame.
Now, Obama turns to colloquialisms to make his points more subtly. Pig in lipstick? Palin handles 5 kids, how does this busy mom handle it?
I think the typical American can see that Obama is just trying to get something going to turn the tide before his campaign loses too much ground. He is a great candidate who will soon get a grip on his tongue!

Posted by: LL | September 9, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Hey skisginer, you say Obama was talking about Bush/McCain? Rrrright! So Bush/McCain wears lipstick? Your excuse was weak, how about another go at it.

Posted by: Darryl | September 9, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Could this guy be any more misogynistic?

Posted by: Landshark | September 9, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Hey Obama, you SUCK!

Posted by: filter | September 9, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Let’s see. McCain spent over 2 years in solitary confinement & Obama has lost it in the pressure of being behind for 2 days. Says almost all that needs to be said.

Posted by: Ted | September 9, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

As an Indy who votes for both parties, I originally was intrigued by Obama’s promises of “no more politics as usual”, “we will reach out to all Americans, Ds and Rs, black and white, young and old, rich and poor”.
Then he picks Biden, the farthest-left radical foot-in-mouth career politican in history to be his “attack dog”.
He not-too-subtly refers to Ms. Palin as a pig with lipstick. Just like Biden refered to Obama as “The first clean Black candidate for President.” Either they are insensitive trashy comments or these two aren’t capable of thinking before they speak. God forbid they start talking about foreign heads of state in those terms if they ever did get elected.
I am from Delaware and I know Biden, and he is what is wrong with politics in America today. two-faced, back-stabbing, arrogant, and vicious.
No more politics as usual! Independents are moving to McCain/Palin in a landslide. Far-left will always vote D and far-right will always vote R (even if they hate McCain for actually voting AGAINST his party more than anyone in recent history). Independents decided the last several elections and we will decide this one. But not for empty rhetoric.
Palin has accomplished real reform and McCain has reached across the aisle all his life. Americans who are not blinded by partisanship know who to vote for.

Posted by: Independent Voter | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

It doesn’t matter if McCain has used the phrase before. Barack used this poorly veiled lipstick reference six days after Palin made headlines talking about lipstick. It’s the catch phrase of the campaign. He knew exactly what he was doing. Perception is everything in politics and he just rubbed raw the wound he created by dumping Hillary overboard. It was petty and small minded and will prove to be a much bigger blunder than he imagined.

Posted by: Woody | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Poor Mrs. Palin… feeling a little defensive? As has been stated- this is a common expression people. If I said to my friend, “Listening to your explanation is like pulling teeth”, does that mean literally that I think he/she is pain-inflicting?? I guess figures of speech are officially off-limits in this election.
Oh wait, John McCain said the exact same thing about Hillary’s health care policy…
Get over it McCanine’s, your show dog pit bull will be scrutinized just as much as Barack, John, and Hillary have been all season long. This is hardball now; you will see the Dems bare their fangs a little bit- you can’t be afraid to back down from a fight (Sarah Palin quote)…. the G.O.P. threw the first stones in their convention which told me that apparently if I am not in their “base”, I am un-American and the reason for all of the country’s problems.
I am an Independent who sees myself becoming more Democratic every day of this election. Not sure if I’ll vote for any of the Republicans this time around. And enough with these soundbite uproars- It’s the ISSUES, stupid.

Posted by: AmericanSoldier | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Sen Obama keeps telling us he is for change, yet time and again when he gets in a tough race he starts with the negative.
You can see it when he went against Clinton and you really see it now that the dream appears to be falling apart.
When the credit card issue comes out against Biden, and I think if Obama has any say in it, it will be before the election he is going to need to pick a new running mate and that is going to be Hillary.
He is running scared.

Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Does anyone realize how much the left-wing bias media would have hopped onto this if it were the other way around, where Sarah Palin or John McCain would have said that Obama was a pig, or referred to him in such a fashion. Anyone whom has a song when they come out that says “The more you know, the less you feel” or “The more you see, the less you feel” has got to be crazy. The socialist dog doesn’t know who he is messing with as the conservatives are bound together by our strong beliefs and we bitter Americans will always stand as one and defeat all evil and liberalism!

Posted by: Michael Hunter | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

This is akin to McCain/Palin saying something like, “I’m just calling a spade a spade!”, referring to Obama. Can you imagine it? What’s worse is that women are already wary of him. I mean, I think it’s great that he said it, because I’m for McCain, but still.. Man, I thought this guy had better sense. BTW, the actual expression is ‘silk hat on a pig’, he changed it to lipstick for Palin’s benefit.

Posted by: Dave | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Does anyone realize how much the left-wing bias media would have hopped onto this if it were the other way around, where Sarah Palin or John McCain would have said that Obama was a pig, or referred to him in such a fashion. Anyone whom has a song when they come out that says “The more you know, the less you feel” or “The more you see, the less you feel” has got to be crazy. The socialist dog doesn’t know who he is messing with as the conservatives are bound together by our strong beliefs and we bitter Americans will always stand as one and defeat all evil and liberalism!

Posted by: Michael Hunter | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Who cares a bout the women who have a positive view of women. Obama was talking about how McCain is climbing on his coat tails of change. What wrong with McCain, can’t get his own slogan, he has to jump and follow Obama??? What a looser… If you thought Obama was talking about Palin, that’s on you….that’s what you really think about her… Oh how quick the Right turns on their own….

Posted by: ah Ha | September 9, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Let’s see, Sarah Palin once used the word “lipstick.” And then Obama used a tired old political expression that happened to have the word lipstick in it. Hmm, how can we pretend these are connected somehow. Hmmmm.

Posted by: jock59801 | September 9, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

McCain/Palin 2008
Hillary/Lieberman 2012

Posted by: Karen | September 9, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

The GOP started this WAR and the WAR in IRAQ,,,Go Get EM’ Obama!!!
4500 Dead in IRAQ,American City Drowned while the GOP watched, Trillions of dollars in debt, Dis-Respected around the world…It’s time for change America.

Posted by: wags | September 9, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Who cares about the women who have a positive view ofPalin? A lot of us don’t. Obama was talking about how McCain is climbing on his coat tails of change. What wrong with McCain, can’t get his own slogan, he has to jump and follow Obama??? What a loser… If you thought Obama was talking about Palin, that’s on you….that’s what you really think about her… Oh how quick the re-puppet-cans turn on their own….

Posted by: ah Ha | September 9, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

And if Palin or McCain had said something even remotely connected to Obama’s race, they’d now be being roasted. But that’s OK, because he’s The Messiah.

Posted by: beth | September 9, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Ladies and Gentlemen…The President of the United States…JOHN MCCAIN!!!!!

Posted by: Bob | September 9, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

This is probably a historic date as the end of Obama’s serious chances of winning this presidential election. Either he is insanely insensitive to how this sounds to women who have thier doubts about him, or he is so stupid that he thinks this is a clever dig on his opponents. If this is how he tries to win the Hillary voters, I can imagine how his negotiations with Iran might end up.

Posted by: muh | September 9, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

You know what is really sad, in today’s society when people judge other people for whom they will vote for and then make a comment like this,
“If you vote for so and so, you are uneducated.”
It is ignorance like this that really shows the importance of sticking to the politics. Obama talks about the last 8 years and draws upon the fact that because McCain is in the same party as George Bush, we will have George Bush.Well my thoughts on that are as follows. For a man who is willing to reach across party lines to make this country better, I salute that.
During the convention it was hard for me to tell if Obama would do the same. He is a strong left sided democrat. The only lines I would see him cross would be for a more conservative democrat…never ever would I ever see red on those hands. We shall see how it goes during the next couple of months, but so far, Obama has only impressed by the way he presents himself, not by the way he is going to lead us with his reform or policies.
It will be a test for both parties, but I think as for us America. We should just relax on negative comments toward each other, and worry more about the debates to see which candidate really has the best direction for this Country.

Posted by: Ryan | September 9, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

Wow. Are we testy. If anyone had said that the same way Obama did, and Hillary was the VP candidate….the sh.. would have it the fan. Go for it ..you realize, you have alrealdy lost to the republicans, and worse, the woman is question, is more man than Obama is! Go! Palin

Posted by: roarin republican | September 9, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

I just saw a video of it.Pathetic. Obama needs to take a walk on the bridge to nowhere.

Posted by: Samantha | September 9, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Does anyone see a parallel here between Obama’s self-implosion and John Kerry’s utter downfall in 2004? Remember how John Kerry got all nasty with the Secret Service agents who were guarding him and before he knew what hit him he lost the election? I feel a similar sense of performance anxiety has set in with Obama. The media can only coddle him for so long before they will be forced to take off the kid gloves and dig deeper into his past. Pulitzer Prizes are not won by bashing a president who is on the way out after eight years. They are won by hard digging reporters gaining knowledge of previously unknown “flaws” about the up and coming political stars of tomorrow (read: Oabama). Well, let’s have at it you media elites. Surely you can dig up some dirt on Obama before the election?

Posted by: Ralph | September 9, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

I’m a proud Democrat. I don’t believe Senator Obama said that. I think the right wing is just trying to put words in his mouth.

Posted by: Julie | September 9, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

They need to shut him up and give him back his teleprompter.
The fool can’t speak a complete sentence on his own.
And don’t give me any **** about it not being about Palin. You know it was. The 2nd line was about Bush. Neither of the lines were about McCain (like Obama said) and if you’re intellectually honest, you know it.
The more he talks and the media bashes Palin, the higher McCain/Palin’s poll numbers will go.
Keep it up Obama! Keep it up Media! LOL LOL LOL

Posted by: Ster | September 9, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Anyone who thinks that Obama’s LIPSTICK was NOT referring to Palin, especially after her Hockey-Mom LIPSTICK comment that was watched by 40 million people, is living in a dream world.

Posted by: Leo | September 9, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

You can put a suit on a Chicago, zero experience, zero accomplishments politician, it’s still an empty suit!

Posted by: John Dutch | September 9, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

as an undecided this has crossed the line – name calling os old time politics at its ugliest. to call Sarah a pig is below the dignity of a president, how can you have hope in a man who stoops to name calling?
I was leaning to Obama, but not sure, Biden is old politics too. Palin was a breath of fresh air and a woman too – some fresh blood to bring real change to Washinton – but this made up my mind.
McCain/Palin has my vote after this tastless lack of judgement

Posted by: akamyname | September 9, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

McCain fired rockets from his jet fighter at the enemy in Vietnam, and Barry fired staples into telephone polls as a community organizer.
Posted by: Monty Ehrich | Sep 9, 2008 8:17:22 PM
He also crashed 5 planes.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Obama is just your common garden-variety politician!!! He has proven again and again there is nothing really special about him. I find his sexist comments inferring Palin is a pig with lipstick, offensive. Where is Jesse Jackson at??? Or his Pastor Wright for guidance???
Interesting article today about Pastor Wright having an affair with his married
church secretary. Same pastor that married Obama and his wife and christened Obama’s children.

Posted by: greenman | September 9, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Thanks goodness Obama is stepping up to that nasty, critical McCain/Palin campaign. Sarah delivered a cynically nasty speach at the Republican Convention and no one blinks and eye, Obama fights back and people call him sexist! Sarah Palin is an antiquated joke, she is backwards and her political stance on abortion, the environment and gun control makes me sick. If Obama had a daughter that was pregnant evryone would blame his parenting as a failure – yet Palin’s daughter is pregnant and the same conservative jerks who usually denounce this all of a sudden praise the family’s moral fiber? It’s a joke. McCain and Palin are running a nasty campaign and I hust hope the majority isnt too stupid to see and realize that Palin is taking steps back for women. As a woman I would NEVER support her! Go Obama!!

Posted by: Go Obama | September 9, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

The Obama camp tries to deny the reference, but look at the words. “Old” as in “old fish” seems a clear reference to McCain, so “pig” is also a clear reference to Palin. Good going, Barry.

Posted by: George | September 9, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

I’m an independent and my support is for McCain & Palin now. I’m tired of the same old political attacks. This crossed a line.

Posted by: A. Lendel | September 9, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Like others, I’m a first time poster on this site. However, I’m saddened by the vitriol that is spewed here. I’m an unabashed Obama Supporter. However, I see things I like in John McCain. I disagree with his positions, but I do so respectfully. To be quite honest, I’d assumed we’d progressed as a nation. I’d assumed that the hatred from decades past had receded. After reading the comments on this site, thread, I’m not so sure. Please know that other countries are indeed watching us.

Posted by: John | September 9, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Haven’t decided sides on this election yet. But I am siding with Obama on this particular one. Obama said whatever he felt was right – big deal! If Palin can stand in front of thousands at the RNC and lie outright about Obama’s tax plan, and has the liberty to take jabs at thousands of community organizers, I don’t see how a simple old expression is so much out of the line. I am an independent, but frankly, I am leaning towards the Dems since the Sarah Palin pick.

Posted by: Sundance | September 9, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Obama is a Marxist. He’s playing the Alynsky line 100%. His mentor.
Almost everything on his platform is more government and less freedom. His ultimate goal is a Socialist state, if not a Marxist state.
Name ONE thing he thinks government should get out of?

Posted by: Ster | September 9, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” – John McCain on Hillary Clinton’s health care plan.

Posted by: johnTX | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

devious indeed my friends, the young wolf has disrobed himself… the man’s true colors shine threw… a wolf in sheep’s clothing no more… sad, but true… heavy sigh*

Posted by: jess | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

The fact is, regardless of the context in which his statement may have been intended, at the very minimum he was as dumb as a box of rocks to say it.
His “pig” comment will play well to the Daily Kos/DU/Huffington/MoveOn crowd, but it’s not going to play well with a lot of women.
The meltdown continues…

Posted by: Hostile Knowledge | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Obama seems to have a little problem with women. He won’t put one on his ticket, and when one runs opposite his ticket, he goes after her and bypasses McCain. Palin is more of a threat to Obama than McCain is!!
That’s pretty sad, especially since Palin isn’t running for President.

Posted by: Steve | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Formula for a McCain/Palin landslide: Just let Obama be Obama.

Posted by: LipstickedBitterClinger | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

The Dean Scream…
The Obama Oink…

Posted by: mmichaels | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

That’s it you lost my vote Obama.

Posted by: cy | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Ethan,
You state none of the former Hillary supporters who are now voting for Palin are “real”. Read all the latest polls which show McCain/Palin with an upward swing of up to 20 points, mostly from women and independents. Are the people answering the phones for all the poll-takers also not real?
Just because you want something to be a certain way, does not mean it is.
You are in what is called a “state of denial”.
You are also what is called a “partisan radical who will only believe what he/she wants to believe regardless of the candidate or reality.”
You need to become an Independent and learn a little objectivity. Then you could assess the situation realistically and see why people are converting and why.

Posted by: Independent Voter | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Many here tried to justify Obama’s expression claiming that it is just an old way of saying. This is true enough.
But Palin had used the “pitt bull with lipstick” expression.
Obama downgraded her to a pig.
I don’t know how intentionally.
But it WAS a bad mistake. A gut reaction.
An inexperienced reaction.
Bad news for Obama, as anyone can see.
And his VP candidate was no better, further bad news…

Posted by: stefano | September 9, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Just saw the video. This race is sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOVER!!!!!!

Posted by: AustinPowers | September 9, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

THE REAL OBAMA !!!!!!

Posted by: LANEI | September 9, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

When Palin hit at Obama in her acceptance speech, she called him on his community organizing experience, because he had belittled her mayorial and gubernatorial experience, she called him on his “bitter” remarks, and she called him on his Greek columns,
But she did NOT call him any names.
(And believe me, I could think of quite a few that I would like to call him…)

Posted by: Lee | September 9, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Let me summarize:
Calling one’s self a pitbull with lipstick = endearing to the Religious Right, and Hockey Moms (although none of the actual Hockey Moms I know even LIKE her.)
Calling McCain’s economic plan a pig in lipstick = trashing Palin????
Sorry Cons, you made this bed for yourselves. You set the tone. You launched the attacks, now deal with it!

Posted by: Intel Agents | September 9, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

OBAMA 08. Please as if the Republicans haven’t been throwing out one liners! All that nonsense Palin said about community organizers and now the Republicans are whining. Give me a break… it’s all a way to divert attention from the real issues, duh. So why don’t McCain/Palin start answering questions huh? Why don’t they discuss real issues, instead of hiding behind their attacks and reactionary jabs?!

Posted by: Beth | September 9, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Wow! I think Obama is not ready for prime time yet. Maybe to young and inexperienced. Palin as a pig? I think the decision is getting clearer with ever negative speech Obama makes.

Posted by: Undecided in Ohio | September 9, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

“John McCain says he’s about change too, and so I guess his whole angle is, ‘Watch out George Bush – except for economic policy, health care policy, tax policy, education policy, foreign policy and Karl Rove-style politics – we’re really gonna shake things up in Washington,’” Obama said.
“That’s not change. That’s just calling something the same thing something different. You know you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig. You know you can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change, it’s still going to stink after eight years. We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”
he was CLEARLY not talking about palin, but mccain’s policies being the same as bush regardless of how he claims to be a change agent….

Posted by: gluvnast | September 9, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

McCain speaking about Hillary October 11, 2007:
While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was “eerily reminiscent” of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the 1990s.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” he said of her proposal.

Posted by: Danny | September 9, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

What the heck does Religion have to do with the economy? War? Education? Healthcare?

Posted by: Sarita | September 9, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

The sound you hear is one million up-till-now fence-sitting women getting down off the fence and racing over to McCain-Palin headquarters to volunteer.

Posted by: poetry | September 9, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Yeah right. It was obviously a reference to Palin, and the crowd knew it, just as intended.
I think the implication that he doesn’t like pigs was also a secret tip of the hat to his muslim supporters.

Posted by: squeenter squillo | September 9, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Obama’s campaign slogan (and the title of his book) should be: The Audacity of Hypocrisy.

Posted by: michaelp0429 | September 9, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Again implying that she shows poor judgement in taking the nomination? This isn’t going to go over well. Good thing he’s not debating her, he might call her “sweetie” or “honey”.

Posted by: LA Thom | September 9, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

CALLING All OBAMS SUPPORTERS!!
Print out this blog and show anyone interested how racist the McCain/Palin supporters are. I am printing out my copy now to take to work.
McCain/Palin are DONE! Their supporters did them in.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

If Obama didn’t mean to say it, or it was a slip, he would apologize himself, not have one of his staff do it for him, and he would have done it immediately. This is too big of a mistake to have his staff explain it away.

Posted by: bobu85 | September 9, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

I’m most concerned if he’s referring to a “Capitalist Pig,” which would really highlight his socialist views.
Or maybe the “my disgust of pigs faith” isn’t far off. Wow… there’s so much one could read into that one comment.

Posted by: Gene | September 9, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

real classy guy ! Hey Dems Thanx!

Posted by: Deraied | September 9, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

“Mrs. palin is in charge of the missle def system right up there by the good ole USSR and IS privy to some high level intelligence briefings”
LOL, this is an outright lie.
You guys are pathetic.
Here’s the General of the AKNG
But, in an interview with The Associated Press on Sunday, he said he and Palin play no role in national defense activities, even when they involve the Alaska National Guard. The entire operation is under federal control, and the governor is not briefed on situations.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 9, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

True Definition of Obama “Change”: New paint on the same old car. This “Change” may look new to the star struck but it is the same money guzzling liberal under the hood who will take us for our last penny!

Posted by: Jason | September 9, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

I voted for him in the primary … not any more. This was a total lack of class.

Posted by: Rick | September 9, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Again,
What change is he talking about? I’d sure like to know about his…
Sounds to me like he could be talkin bout anybody… including himself :)
Food for thought…

Posted by: Kimbra Baker | September 9, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

Please, Please, Barry…keep it up.. your political instincts are fantastic!

Posted by: Michael | September 9, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

So much divisiveness…so much rancor…so much disconnect from the real issues. The facts are: we have destabilized the Middle East; Iran is about to become a nuclear power and the USA has become the pariah around the globe; we have a multi trillion dollar deficit; a housing/banking crisis that has had ripple effects on the global economy; a severe energy dependency problem; continued drain of jobs to overseas; failing schools. THe list goes on. PLEASE America, no matter how you vote DEBATE THE ISSUES. BE THE SOLUTION AND NOT THE PROBLEM. STOP the namecalling and sophomoric dialogue on this blog. THE WORLD IS WATCHING THIS ELECTION CLOSELY

Posted by: JustAThought | September 9, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

News flash for Trevor. Your remark calling Gov. Palin a pig is disgraceful. Enough said.

Posted by: teine girl | September 9, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

I only have two words for you, B.O. – desperate and despicable

Posted by: Lori Lyman | September 9, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Obama stoops to new low

Barack Obama has stooped to a new low, and I don’t mean his plunging poll figures. Obama, talking about VP candidate Sarah Palin, said ‘You Can Put Lipstick on a Pig, But It’s Still a Pig’. Adding insult to injury, … the crowd applauded. Obama …

Posted by: Right Truth | September 9, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

This is ludicrous. Why does Palin need protection from media, expressions that Lincoln used and from true examination by us, the voters. She is strictly a mannequin stand in for Hillary. She is a PR prop to get votes. Don’t you people realize how you are being used? I can’t believe the nation is falling for this. Do your homework. Who wants McCain, the cowardly confession signer, or Palin, the talking billboard, in our White House? How could you want them there? I know that I do not want a coward (McCain) in the White House.

Posted by: Jacqueline Mac SC | September 9, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

The libs were hoping that Sarah Palin would be another Eagleton, looks like it may wind up being Obama.

Posted by: Chris | September 9, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

doesn’t mean squat to Sarah. She has taken comments like this from (male) politicians like him all of her adult life. She then takes their comments and spanks them with them. No worries…

Posted by: StarRider | September 9, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

What a horrible thing to say. I thought he was smarter than that.
An intelligent person knows that comment, while running against a woman, could be seen as sexist and rude.
He’s obviously taking the low road.

Posted by: Dogstar | September 9, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Lionel: Obama has never run anything but his mouth. Your point?

Posted by: Morgo | September 9, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

You make fun of community organizers (another vield racist attack like wellfare mom) and now Obama uses a well known phrase in relation to Mccain, racist bastards are out again crying foul. Where were they when their god limbaugh was calling Clinton’s daughter a dog?
It’s sickening to see conservative hypocrisy on every issue. They are allowed to cross all standards of decency but when somebody fights back.

Posted by: Mp | September 9, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Why are all these comments so one sided? I have heard the Mccain and Rove have web surfers posting crap like this to give them an advantage. I bet half of these posts are from their staff…. Oh, maybe not, they’re all to busy lobbying WA and taking your rights.

Posted by: Jaco | September 9, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

OBAMA just said exactly what needed to be said. The truth. And its hurts. Sorry…

Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 9, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

One more week of Obama’s idiocy and the bullpen call will go out and he’ll be replaced by Hillary. What a debacle.

Posted by: Des | September 9, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

We are winning the war in Iraq, oil prices are coming down, we are about to blitz Afghanistan and kill a bunch of terrorists, the dollar is getting stronger…
of course Obama wants to say outrageous things to make news…we can’t have all that other stuff being front page news!!!!

Posted by: john | September 9, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

OBAMA just said exactly what needed to be said. The truth. And its hurts. Sorry…

Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 9, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Intentional, unintentional, McCain said it about Hillary’s health care plan — all irrelavent!
The PERCEPTION is Barack called his VP opponent a pig. Plain and simple. If he thinks he can win with 40% of the female vote then it was a great move. Otherwise it might be the #1 political blunder of the season.

Posted by: Woody | September 9, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

So now the GOP has got a copyright on the word “lipstick”?
Google “Lipstick on a Pig” and you get 370,000 hits, and 369,983 of them don’t refer to Sarah Palin, but rather to an american colloquialism.
Probably hasn’t reached the elitists at McCain headquarters.
When I was in school there was a girl called “Barracuda”, it was because she was a man-eater.

Posted by: SoxFan | September 9, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

By using that line, according to the pinheads at McCain’s campaign, Obama is calling Palin a pig. Yet, as this quote reflects, “The colorful cosmetic has become a political buzzword, thanks to Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin’s joke in her acceptance speech that lipstick is the only thing that separates a hockey mom like her from a pit bull. ”
So, is Paln calling herself a dog? If I had to choose, and it’s a tough choice, I’d call her a poodle.

Posted by: Bill Adkins | September 9, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

The Dem candidate shows his mysoginistic side yet again.

Posted by: s.b. | September 9, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Awesome! I’m glad to see Obama standing up to his opponents, man or woman. Once your in the ring, your in the ring. Palin opened that one up herself with her “pitbull with lipstick” comment. Come on, do you really think she could get away with that?

Posted by: You go guy! | September 9, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Well, this Independent Voter has made up his mind. A pig in lipstick is better than a jackass with a hoof in it’s mouth.

Posted by: indyvoter | September 9, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

The comment was spot on.
Obama isn’t calling Palin a pig. Although she referred to herself as a pitbull.
The Republicans have nothing but their tired Rove formula.
And if you roll out a woman who only repeats speeches written by Bush speech writer Matthew Scully and then use her as a campaign prop…..that would be the definition of ‘putting lipstick on a pig’.

Posted by: The truth hurts | September 9, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

By the way…of course he is going to call names, it’s all he has. Notice how much he ISN’T saying about his running mate? That’s because his is just another career polition, that became filthy rich in office, just like most of our elected congress on both sides. What has Obama accomplished as a senator? That’s right, nothing. All he has done is run for the White House. Too bad for for his state. They wasted their vote for him. They’ve had no representation from him at all.

Posted by: Robert | September 9, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I keep hearing media being biased too… Do you people know who owns the majority of Media? Rupert Murdoch? You think he’s a liberal progressive? No, he wants you all to go back to your troughs and drink his cool aid. If the media is biased, it’s biased against Obama. When have you ever seen a VP get more attention than the Presidential nominee? Only when the Nominee doesn’t have a chance.

Posted by: Jaco | September 9, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Just like he flipped off Hillary twice. Obama is a sexist pig with or without lipstick. Back in 1992 Bush senior started to lose it and called Clinton/Gore “Bozo and Ozone Man”. Obama has reached that point already

Posted by: geevill | September 9, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Classy.

Posted by: Chris | September 9, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Ok folks, don’t loose your heads! It’s a phrase that has been used in this area for years. But go ahead and trash him…you have on almost everything about the man, his name, religion, wife and even a hand gesture. Now McCain is a war hero. Thank you very much Mr. McCain. But, he spent how long locked up, tortured, and treated like an animal? I have met people in my life that have suffered far less than he and have many disturbing mental and anger issues. Now, don’t loose it again. I didn’t say Mr. McCain was mentally unstable I have never met or spoken to him. But, I do have a problem voting for someone from any party with that background, war hero or not.

Posted by: south | September 9, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

“Because it’s one of my favorite things about my dad, that he wasn’t running for president since high school, you know, he was not a good student, notoriously rebellious, drove fast cars, dated a stripper.”
-Meghan McCain on the Today Show
You think McBush is miffed that nobody cares about him anymore? Or do you think his plan was to convince the GOP that Palin was the actual candidate and forget about him.

Posted by: Andrew | September 9, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

This is the sign of someone who is realizing he’s slowly losing support.
blatant name calling = desperation
STAY STRONG SARAH!!

Posted by: S4406 | September 9, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

You can put a tie on an empty suit…it’s still an empty suit!

Posted by: Beep | September 9, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Obama has used the phrase “lipstick on a pig” many times and so has McCain. Look at Marc Ambinder’s blog at the Atlantic and you can confirm that. This is an imaginary story about misogyny because there’s none of that involved!
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/obama_did_not_call_sarah_palin.php

Posted by: DG | September 9, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

The convention “bounce” is not subsiding and all major polls are trending to McCain-Palin. As well, the support of women is surging.
Bad news for “The One.”

Posted by: Hostile Knowledge | September 9, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Nothing comes out of any political candidate’s mouth without careful vetting of the words. Obama knew what he was saying could be taken as him calling Palin a pig. But he chose to say it anyway. He can backpeddle all he wants, but he’s not Slick Willie and it’s going to hurt him. Stupid move, and whoever advised him to use that little ditty should be fired.

Posted by: Ana Sarca | September 9, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Did Obama just call Palin a pig????
He is losing it.
Seems O-Spears can’t stand it when the spotlight is off him and on the next new phenom.

Posted by: JA | September 9, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Well, well, well. I’m not surprised. Nor insulted. But this comment is a sure sign the Obama Campaign is struggling.
And that’s too bad. The elite media has been extremely biased and has treated Obama with kid gloves all throughout the primaries. It’s McCain and the Republican convention that finally vetted his record in public (something the media refused to do) and thus, delivered a well thrown punch to the gut.
It’s the media that put him where he is today. It’s the media that thinks they can elect a president.

Posted by: C.S. | September 9, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

It wasnt a swipe at Palin, this is so contrived its not even funny. Lipstick on a pig is a popular expression. It has in fact been used in this election long before Palin’s speech about pitbulls and lipstick. It was meant to describe the GOP not Palin. Quit the faux outrage its just pathetic. No one cares except for internet trolls who visit Drudge.

Posted by: Sweet Jesus | September 9, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

Is McCain going to whine everytimge someone says something negative about Palin? My god!! Is he a man or Palin’s angry father who won’t let anyone treat her like a real candidate instead of the window dressing she really is? “Pig in lipstick” HILARIOUS!!!!

Posted by: Bill Adkins | September 9, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

It’s exactly what the people in this country who only respond to negativity and hate (ie. Repugs) needed to hear – Palin’s precious analogy turned on its head. A pig is much more suitable – an ignorant, radical, worthless pig at that…one that squeals in the corner and needs extensive tutoring before appearing in softball interviews. Hope they don’t ask her to find Iraq on a map.

Posted by: Can'tfindthecave | September 9, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Mr. Obama, might be an old saying but poor judgement to use it now. Clearly displays you are feeling the heat.

Posted by: Chris | September 9, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

I can’t believe people even care about this. I care about policies not this dribble.

Posted by: zz | September 9, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

The more he talks, the more we see what kind of character he has.
Honestly, I think I had more respect for him about a year ago (when I didn’t know as much about him as I do now).
By the way, I checked his voting record today, and saw that he entered a “No Vote” (NV) over 40% of the times he voted.
Let me ask you…
if your job is to put wheels on cars and 40% of the time you choose not to use lug nuts, would you get to keep your job?

Posted by: mnuhmnuh | September 9, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

You go Nobama!! McCain ’08 BABY!!!

Posted by: Michael Savage | September 9, 2008, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

Repubs, keep listening to Palin and let me know when she says anything more than she’s a “reformer” and how she likes McSame. Give us some substance, not just lipstick…

Posted by: Heyguy101 | September 9, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Heck, I don’t blame oBama for saying what he thinks. I think all democrat woman have hairy legs, wear khakis, penny loafers and walk with a swagger. I’m not ashamed to say what I think, why should he be. All’s fair in politics. McCain/Palin 08…12…etc.

Posted by: StarRider | September 9, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

I don’t care for McCain or Palin and I’m not voting for them but Obama is really wearing on my nerves. In the beginning I was excited, but I think I’ve got Obama fatigue now.

Posted by: dave | September 9, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Yes, the audience understood it as they wanted to hear it. The problem is that he already has their vote. Do you think that comment appeals to the women who are moving away from him? Or how about the crossover voters? This was a stupid thing to say.

Posted by: SC | September 9, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

The Rove-ites and the FLAT EARTH PEOPLE are in their usuall intellectual form here.
Amusing……………

Posted by: paulss | September 9, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

ROFL!!!
“No, she’s new!” Obama said. “She hasn’t been on the scene, you know, she’s got five kids and my hat goes off to anybody who’s looking after five. I’ve got two and they tire Michelle and me out!”
Really? I thought Michelle’s mother was watching the kids while they campaigned.

Posted by: AmericanWoman | September 9, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Palin has criticized Obama for $311 million in earmarks in Illinois ($25 per citizen). But Alaska received $198 million in earmarks ($295 per citizen). Seen any rush by Palin to return that money? Add that to the fact even though she was for the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it, when the project was stopped Alaska kept the money. More hypocrisy courtesy of the Republican Party and Sara Palin. More of McCain and his whiners putting lipstick on that pig.

Posted by: Bill Adkins | September 9, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

I was undecided until this. Frankly, Obama was over the top here and I think he pretty much has lost my vote.

Posted by: Undecided | September 9, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

It’s about time we started fighting. All Repubs are evil and anything is justified to beat them. Go Obama. We know what you meant!

Posted by: Intheloop | September 9, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Hey Obama! Checkmate! You just lost the election.

Posted by: Warren Z | September 9, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Obama’s pig comments are way out of line.

Posted by: Catherine | September 9, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

HELLO! Does ANYONE understand that this is a VERY OLD EXPRESSION. McCain has been quoted saying it, and Obama said it earlier this election when talking about our Iraq policy – LONG BEFORE PALIN WAS EVER MENTIONED! Stop faking the outrage the Drudge just fed to you. Try, for once, to DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK.

Posted by: J. Harding | September 9, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

ABC — hats off to you for allowing freedom of expression on this blog. While it’s clear that NBC, CBS, AP, and MSNBC are trying to hand the election to Obama (at the expense of their own credibility) you are allowing the pros/cons of both sides to be aired out here with little or no intervention. In other words, you are giving people a voice regardless of which side they are on. Nice job…you get a thumbs up for this.

Posted by: Ralph | September 9, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

I’m glad Obama called Palin a pig. Maybe she is for change if you mean vouchers and the Bush tax policies. But she’s not for REAL change which means free healthcare and no more rigging elections and no more false flag 9/11 attacks and no more theofascist Republicans!!!

Posted by: John | September 9, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

They need to send Sarah Bodine..uh..I mean Palin..back to Alaska where she can dine on some more Moose-sicles. She has been looking kinda malnourished lately.
Iwould rather see her cousins the Clapetts (Jed, Elly May and Granny) in the White House than McCain and Palin.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

Nothing is funnier than people who think that Matt Drudge taking a commonly-used phrase and turning it into a sexist comment has handed the election to anyone.
Have you heard, Palin told the government “Thanks but no thanks on that bridge to nowhere”?
Maybe she’ll tell us that 44 more times this week.
She might have said no to the bridge (after saying yes to it) but she still took the $370 million.
How can you neocon, racist d-bags actually be head-over-heels for someone you know practically nothing about?
Could it be because the actual presidential candidate on the ticket is loathed by the entire party?

Posted by: Andrew | September 9, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

I was undecided until this.
Go Obama! You finally grew a backbone!
Obama 08!

Posted by: Undecided Gal | September 9, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

“Who wants McCain, the cowardly confession signer, or Palin, the talking billboard, in our White House? How could you want them there? I know that I do not want a coward (McCain) in the White House.”
Posted by: Jacqueline Mac SC | Sep 9, 2008 8:36:11 PM
Is this what the angry left is going to resort to? John McCain may be called a lot of things, and not all postive, but calling him a coward is beyond the pale.

Posted by: J.J. Smith | September 9, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

I wonder if Palin is offended that McCain automatically thought the pig comment reffered to her?

Posted by: ElSupremo | September 9, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

The comments by Obama are bad in taste… I guess in the next 60 days we will be seeing the inner core of each candidate…
But my vote for McCain / Palin.

Posted by: kabir | September 9, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

There’s nothing wrong if he will make an example by referring to another form of living things. Look, Palin called herself as barracuda with lipstick so I don’t think what Sen. Obama said is offensive. The McCain education ad is the one that offends me because this is pure blatant attack to a father of two beautiful children. I could not believe they have to go that low. Senator Obama has been attacked with outrageous lies and he just had enough of this. Is it ok for his opponents to continuously mocking him and it’s unacceptable if Sen. Obama says something different?

Posted by: stclaire for Obama08 | September 9, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Great turn of a phrase.
It’s intent was to recognize that nothing has changed in the republican platform.
All they did was put a woman on the ticket to read someone else’s speeches (bush’s speech writer!) and she won’t even take reporters questions.
This will prove very effective in pulling back the curtain to reveal the same old republicans at the controls.
Do you really think they’d let Gov. Palin run any part of the administration?

Posted by: Wilbur | September 9, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

John McCain is a sell-out and exposed he is just a typical Republican politician by picking Palin. He picked her to appease his base and poach Hillary votes. Palin wasn’t the best or most qualified, it’s because he knew she would be popular. How is that being a “maverick”? How is it ‘Country First”? How is this “I rather win a war than loose an election”?
I’ll say it again, John McCain you are a sell-out.
The most important metric for picking a VP is they are ready to step in from day one. His judgment is reckless and he gambled at our expense. The mere fact Palin is being taught foreign policy is fact she wasn’t prepared on day one.
I lost all my respect for John McCain. He’s not the hero today he was 35 years ago. McCain is nothing without Palin.
What does it say about a campaign that has to “mimic” what and who Obama is, not to mention hijack Obamas core message of Change from day one just to poach votes? Is that all they view Obama as, a “product” a “formula”, a “personality”? It makes McCain look weak and more importantly, the American people stupid if they fall for it.
Now all these puppets are willing to just get behind her without even knowing anything about her and try to convince the American public she is prepared to be VP or President while they gave Obama hell for 20 months straight? Not even uncertain objectiveness, caution, pause or question just because she has an “R” in front of her name? How can anyone make a clear determination reasonably in less than 60 days?
Bravo America! We look like complete idiots once again while the world watches. I am truly embarrassed of my country. I guess all isn’t lost, at least many will have Palin’s eye glass frames while our country crumbles economically. We are such tools.

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

Let’s not forget the second part of the comment “You can wrap an old fish in newspaper but it still stinks” Veiled reference to McCain. Clearly these were very intentional.

Posted by: sc | September 9, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

If this election really comes down to barnyard animals and what’s sexist or not, I have no hope for the future of this country. Perhaps I’ll move to Alaska and join the secessionist movement.
I find it ironic that Sarah Palin can expell string of lies and insults and it’s called a “great speech,” but Obama simply states the truth and he gets criticized.

Posted by: Michael | September 9, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

before you go throwing mud… look this up
McCain criticized Democratic contenders for offering what he called costly universal health-care proposals that require too much government regulation. While he said he had not studied Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton’s plan, he said it was “eerily reminiscent” of the failed plan she offered as first lady in the 1990s.
“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” he said of her proposal.
looks like Obama wasn’t the only one that said it.
please find something meaningful to discuss

Posted by: read this | September 9, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Who called Hillary a whiner. hehehehe. The irony from a woman who is a self described “pit bull.”

Posted by: Pity Party Palin Call the whaaaambulance | September 9, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Another Thought in case you missed it
Crissie Mathews mentioned that tingle up his leg, it struck me he ought to get his hand out of his pocket

Posted by: Gary | September 9, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Just watched the video; this outrage is all hype. Obama was referring to McSame’s economic and foreign policies and how they are essentially no different from those of the Bush administration. Shame on Drudge for putting Palin’s picture above the link to this story. Talk about spin.
Moreover, those of us who are informed can recall that Obama had already been using this expression in reference to the McCain campaign long before Palin came on board.

Posted by: Independent | September 9, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

Sorry Drudge trolls, The country is going to elect a brilliant mind, not a clueless bimbo who lives in a igloo trailer!
“In the Illinois state legislature for eight years, Barack sponsored laws for increased childcare subsidies, ethics and healthcare reform, homicide interrogation videotaping, etc. In the US Congress, in addition to the above-mentioned, he teamed with Russ Feingold to pass the “Honest Leadership and Open Government Act” representing major campaign finance and lobbyist reform. He has sponsored numerous bills, many of which have become law, in areas such as veterans’ care, environment, foreign policy, hurricane relief, homeland security, ethics, education, health care, energy, consumer protection, etc. Barack serves on the Foreign Relations Committee, the Veterans’ Affairs Committee, Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. As a senator, he has traveled all over the world, including Eastern Europe, Africa, Russia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Afghanistan, and multiple trips to Kuwait, Iraq,Israel, Jordan, Palestinian territories.Regarding management skills, Barack has been managing a 50-state campaign for almost exactly as long as Sarah Palin has been Governor of Alaska. No one denies that this campaign has been expertly managed. Before becoming Alaskan Governor 20 months ago, Palin was merely the mayor of a town whose population was at that time 5,500.

Posted by: irene | September 9, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

It is time for the Democrats to dump this dirtbag Obama. He is horrible.
Put Hillary on the ticket and dump Obama.

Posted by: Joel | September 9, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

OMG they really are dead set in trying to paint the “Pit Bull” as a victim.

Posted by: Palin Call the whaaaambulance | September 9, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

It’s true.

Posted by: Britten | September 9, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

John McCain once had honor – but since 2000 by embracing George W. Bush figuratively and literally, the man who ran a campaign accusing John McCain of being a collaborator, a traitor, a criminal, John McCain forfeited all claim to honor. Yes, McCain has lost touch with what he was and has become the very antithesis of the war hero.
And now he wants us to believe this pig with lipstick should be vice president?

Posted by: Bill Adkins | September 9, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

And what is the lead story on Hannity and Colmes right now????????
Lipstick and a Pig!!!
Ta DAAAAAAAAAA!
PUMA!

Posted by: LeeLee07 | September 9, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

Obama: ‘Lipstick on a pig’(Barry crossed the line)

This one was over the line…read the comments at Politico 500 posts and counting….Captain Bullshit stepped in it this time.

Posted by: Jawa Report | September 9, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

So McCain can toss the line about anytime he wants and it’s no big deal?
Priceless for the faux outrage McCain is showing over this on the same day he releases an entire advertisement trying to say guidelines to explain to children in simple terms (“bad touching”) for child molestation with “teaching them about sex”.
So I think I understand the guidelines now. John McCain and Sarah Palin can toss about insults and lies at will, but anything directed at them is off-limits.
Sounds like someone can stand the heat . . . I’d finish that thought but then I’d be accused of a low-down sexist comment as well.

Posted by: Judy | September 9, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

I am as disappointed in Barack as I have been since this all started. Can he imagine how he would feel if someone tried to make these smears about Michelle? And, please do not claim that you did not intend for the insult to tarnish Palin. Lipstick and fish odor have been locker room insults directed toward women for years. I thought you were above it.

Posted by: Ashley | September 9, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

I’m just flabbergasted as usual. This was a pretty unthinking thing to say by the O-man, though really it’s pretty doubtful he consciously meant to say it about S-cuda. Still it is one more in a puzzling series of recent gaffes (malapropisms for all you city folks). The thing that really is disturbing is the vitriol (nasty vibes and stinky comments for you small-towners) being flung about by unthinkers on both sides here. How about some intelligent discourse instead of wild charges and invective directed at the Governor of Alaska and the junior Senator from Illinois?

Posted by: flabbergasted | September 9, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Most Republicans are cowards and now they are hiding once again beyond false claims of sexism.
McCain was a man of honor and he should come out and have an actual debate, not hide behind a “hockey mom”.

Posted by: San | September 9, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Just to be sure I watched the Obama / Pig lipstick video twice.
I was die hard for Hillary, who after a lot of soul searching had decided to vote for Obama.
NO MORE!
Obamas Pig comment was a very SEXIST INSULT TO ALL WOMEN!
I might not agree with all their positions but America will survive and be still a better country!
Now I’m McCain / Palin all the way!

Posted by: Angela | September 9, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Well the sad fact of the matter is niether McCaibn or Obama have talked about how they might say our disappeating manufacturing base. Manufacturing is what produces the country’s wealth and more importantly it produces the country’s war toys. In the end it is how many war toys you can potentially produce that will keep us free. Remember the term arsenal of democracy.

Posted by: Michael | September 9, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

These angry republicans don’t realize that McCain used the same phrase when talking about Hillary Clinton. I assume all their furor will also be directed at McCain as well.
Also Obama has this used phrase in other contexts as well. For example, he said:
‘I think that both General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker are capable people who have been given an impossible assignment,’ Sen. Barack Obama said yesterday in a telephone interview. ‘George Bush has given a mission to General Petraeus, and he has done his best to try to figure out how to put lipstick on a pig.

Posted by: JT | September 9, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Saying that the pig comment is sexist is a fake outrage. What I got when I heard it is a reference to Palin’s history of pork-barrelling politics, in which as a mayor of Wasilla, she hired a lobbyist to game congress for about 25 million dollars for a town of 5000 at the time. Her handwriting and initials are captured on a document that highlighted her success in bringing in pork money for Wasilla. As governor, Palin campaign for office in 2006 as a supporter for the Bridge to nowhere, and she is even captured on a photo proudly raising a Bridge to nowhere sweater. Also, Congress had nixed funding for the project in 2005, and when it was apparent that the Alaska congressional team couldn’t get more pork money from Congress, Palin finally stopped the Bridge to nowhere project. Finally, Palin led the public to believe she returned the pork money, with the phrase “thanks, but no thanks”, when in fact she kept all the money that was allocated, in excess of $200 million. As far as I am concerned, Governor Palin is the queen of pork-barrel politics, and this is what the pig reference is for. Corruption and misspending by government officials concerns citizens, and we must be able to use the language that people understand to refer to corrupt officials, whether they are male or female.

Posted by: p3ng | September 9, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Wow people you are seeing a campaign self destruct!
NOBAMA 08

Posted by: MIKE | September 9, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

“The way in which men cling to old institutions after the life has departed out of them, and out of themselves, reminds me of those monkeys which cling by their tails — aye, whose tails contract about the limbs, even the dead limbs, of the forest, and they hang suspended beyond the hunter’s reach long after they are dead. It is of no use to argue with such men. They have not an apprehensive intellect, but merely, as it were a prehensile tail.”
Henry David Thoreau

Posted by: skyking_239 | September 9, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Why does Palin get to rattle off dumb one liners and no one says boo, but Obama does and it’s the lead on Drudge Report? Talk about your double standards! What he said was absolutely true.

Posted by: Bud | September 9, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

On that bridge to nowhere -
1. She never said she was always against it.
2. At first blush someone offering to give you 200 Billion Dollars to create jobs and improve your infrastructure naturally sounds like a good deal.
3. Once she figured out just how dumb it was she DID veto it. She didn’t lie at all. She is 100% accurate in everything she has said about it.
4. Alaska does get more Government road construction money per capita than other states because it is HUGE and sparsely populated. The same is true of other geographically large states. When the people of Alaska elected her she promised to fight for them and has. I now want her to fight for all of us as V.P.
5. As for her not sending the check back for the 200 Billion the government sent her – what person would? Certainly no Democrat. Maybe McCain would have – he really is that honorable – but Palin’s using those funds for legitimate investments in her state’s infrastruction was a wise choice – one of the many reasons she has 82% approval ratings.

Posted by: michaelp0429 | September 9, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

“I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.”
- John McCain, discussing Hilary Clinton’s universal health-care plan, October 11, 2007

Posted by: paul | September 9, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

That right, Barry. You jes’ keep on sayin’ them things all you wants. Sounds like desperation is creeping into the dem rhetoric.

Posted by: Jubilate Latte | September 9, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Obama supporter the black blind Governor of NY is claiming “community organizer” is a code word for black.

Posted by: geevill | September 9, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

The more the Democrats go after Palin, the more they will drive Independents to the Republicans. They are taking the bait and taking the country back to the same old politics as usual… slash and burn.
Me and my lipsticked gal pals are voting for Palin/McCain.

Posted by: Kathy | September 9, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

From the other side of the planet is a good distance to watch the US Presidential election from.
I see things becoming more polarized (not good).
A couple of weeks ago I thought Obama could not lose. I wonder how his foot tastes? I reckon he just took a swipe at a lot of his voters and it will hurt him. He had better stay on his game and focus on the issues. Maybe he didnt mean to say what he did, but it shows what he is thinking and the voters know it. This election was his to lose and I reckon he is throwing it away one sound bite at a time.

Posted by: Overseas | September 9, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Everyone knows Obama was referring to Palin. Six days ago 40 million people heard her joke about Hockey-Moms, Pitt Bulls and Lipstick. Now Obama uses the LIPSTICK-PIG comment and we are supposed to believe he was’n once again showing his SEXIST true colors that were on display against Hillary.
Either way the guy is a moron.

Posted by: Leo | September 9, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Whoever in the Obama campaign that this would be clever should be sacked. That comment has backfired big time. Foolish tactic with strategic implications with folks he’s trying to court.

Posted by: Texan | September 9, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

I cannot believe Obama said that to a fellow american. It was hateful, mean and hurtful to anyone he was addressing.

Posted by: nico faris | September 9, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Some of you act like Obama made this up just for Palin when in fact it’s an old expression.

Posted by: erin | September 9, 2008, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm

Keep up the great work, NoBama! The more you act yourself with your insensitive, sexist crude comments, the more people will turn to the ticket with class – McCain/Palin. You really are a pathetic excuse for a presidental nominee and a total disappointment to the Democatic party and the great United States of America. By the way, check out the latest polls. People are flocking to the McCain/Palin ticket – the next president and vice president of the United States!!!!!!!

Posted by: SwellKell | September 9, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I say this as someone who has no civics class fantasies about elections.
This is disgusting. With the fate of the world in the balance, it is astonishing what we’re talking about just a few weeks from the election.

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

I guess Obama wont be missing the 13 votes just from my family. And we all plan to spread the word that Obama is the last person this country needs. Turns out that its not that hard to find McCain/Palin supporters. The more Obama bashes the lower his numbers get. It’s interesting that the change Obama talks about doesn’t include accountability. What’s he afraid of?

Posted by: Linda | September 9, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Another nail in the coffin of journalism:
“The crowd rose and applauded, some of them no doubt thinking he may have been alluding to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s ad lib during her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech last week, “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.”
What a pathetic two-step Jake!!!
1) Ascribe thoughts that you cannot possibly know to “some” in the crowd.
2) Ascribe motive, based on imagined crowd reaction, to the speaker
Why do we even need Drudge when we have you Jake?

Posted by: gbl | September 9, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Way to go nObama. Cliche’s. . . Is that all you have? What’s your plan.

Posted by: nObama | September 9, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

The reason people won’t get upset about the comment about Hillary is everyone knows she’s a pig. Even Bill.
The reason people are upset about the comment aimed at Palin is that people like her and know she isn’t a pig.
Obama is wrecking his campaign big time!

Posted by: Kathy | September 9, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Posted by: nope | September 9, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

As an Independent I thought about voting for Obama at one point in time. No more…he is clearly an idiot in times on desperation. Exactly what our country doesn’t need.
Also, how can you tell a looser democrat on sites like this….they have nothing better to do than type line after line that nobody with a real life/job has time to read. Libs are totally imploding.

Posted by: lilylulu | September 9, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

This sounds like something a community organizer would say!!

Posted by: Jose | September 9, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Wow – first he calls them liars, now he’s calling Palin a pig.
The real Odrama is starting to show – very classless; and in no way Presidential.

Posted by: steve | September 9, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

It’s an expression – it basically means that you can’t camouflage the truth. Lots of people use it, I’ve used it before. Why would anyone call a beautiful woman like Palin a pig, least of all Obama? It probably didn’t even occur to him that a common expression, one that McCain has apparently used before, would be taken as an insult of Governor Palin.
If anything, I think it’s sexist that Drudge put Governor Palin’s photo above what he must know, by now, is a common expression. This election is ridiculous. When do we get to talk about Hugo Chavez’s and Brazil’s deals with Russia? Or why the first oil contract by the Maliki government went to China? Are we really going to base this election on media spin like this, when we have real issues that need to be discussed? No wonder this country is going down the tubes.

Posted by: Paige | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I have been on the fence but no longer. It’s not necessarily what Obama said that has pushed me to the other side. It’s the nasty names that Obama supporters choose to call Ms. Palin as their way of responding to an obvious mis-spoken comment by Obama. I’m gone Obama. McCain Palin 08

Posted by: Tom in Cary | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

As an Independent I thought about voting for Obama at one point in time. No more…he is clearly an idiot in times on desperation. Exactly what our country doesn’t need.
Also, how can you tell a looser democrat on sites like this….they have nothing better to do than type line after line that nobody with a real life/job has time to read. Libs are totally imploding.

Posted by: lilylulu | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

You people are absolutely ridiculous. Obama has used this expression many times. As has McCain when discussing Hillary Clinton’s health care plan. Really.
You all ought to be ashamed of yourselves for making a mockery out of the very real issue of women’s rights. Your phony outrage has no place here.

Posted by: slag | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Poor Barry, you can take the Organizer out Community but you can’t take the Community out of the Organizer.

Posted by: GMark | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

BO has finally shown his true colors.
He is a misogynistic woman hater who rode the back of Alice Palmer in Illinois to run un-opposed using the political thug Daley machine in Chicago.
He further beat down women when he lied on Senator HRC and the President to call then racists and used such inflammatory language against Senator HRC that I am appalled any one with a uterus can even utter his name.
When will we find out from the MSM that BO is not even a citizen and was born in Kenya?
The truth has finally emerged.

Posted by: Former Democrat | September 9, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

The fact that half of you Obama “supporters” viewed this vitriolic attack as one directed at Palin is exactly what makes it reprehensible and vile. You can make all the apologies you want. When you have nothing to say, other than the STANDARD DNC PLATFORM, you lash out with personal attacks. I am glad they taught you all that at Haaaaavaaad. If someone had made a reference to you even remotely twistable as racist, MSNBC and the rest of you pathetic whiners would be at the top of the mountain screaming for bloody heads on platters. Civil discourse in this Country of ours is dead. You people want anarchy. I hope you are all happy when you destroy the fabric of this great Nation.

Posted by: EdGe | September 9, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

It is obvious Obama is becoming more frantic one statement at a time. Can you imagine him as President and attacking his women counter parts at world meetings? Poor man! His VP pick is the one who was supposed to make the slip of the tongue comments.
Keep it up Obama as you are doing a good job nailing your coffin, one nail at a time!

Posted by: cammie | September 9, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Wow Obama “the unifier” is doing a great job bringing us all together, huh?

Posted by: Bacon | September 9, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Clearly, this is an allusion to Sarah Palin, whose “difference between a pitbull and a pig” comment became famous.
Obama made a mistake by using this hateful term against a woman.

Posted by: Andrew | September 9, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

That phrase has been used so often in this campaign already, it shows where the republican gutter mind is. Very clear. You just called your VP choice a pig, all by yourselves, losers.

Posted by: Hans Meiser | September 9, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

I’m 33…never gave money to a political party. I gave $$$ tonight to McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Michael | September 9, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

And they wonder why white women are voting for Mccain/Palin. The democrats are grasping at straws and getting totally desperate.

Posted by: Susan N | September 9, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Obama should be ashamed to call himself an American, his comment about lipstick pig was a disgraceful.

Posted by: sun | September 9, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

Open Letter to Obama,
Ive been listening for a long time, and have heard few specifics of what you would actually do to change things….
What I have heard though, loud an clear, your character coming through in “pigs”….
You once spoke on high, and even looked the guy.
But now your words are but hollow squeals, and your strut like a strutting pig.
It’s becoming clear, your lipstick is wearing off dear….
Thank you for in the end, for being clear and showing us your spear.

Posted by: Jane | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Funny to see so many people say this is going to hurt Obama’s campaign. WRONG! This is what we need to see more of. Calling out McCain and Palin for the ignorant, inept, and most of all dangerous barnyard creatures they are. It may be crass for Obama, but it’s getting down to the GOP’s level and apprently, the only level that many in this country respond to.

Posted by: huh | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

This is extremely insensitive and below presidential politics. Obama is clearly calling Palin a pig. Not needed in our country. clean it up!

Posted by: danny thompson | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

What the hell! He clearly compared Palin to a pig and McCain to an old fish.
Heh, I guess it shows what an “ass” he is.

Posted by: Katie | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

This is no mistake or an old joke. I’ve heard two other democratic surrogates when interviewed on TV use the very same line. Except that the hosts didn’t catch it. It was just yesterday on FOX. This is a direct and coordnated attack on Sara Palin, no question about it. Obama is very much losing it!

Posted by: Mike | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

I’m a McCain supporter, but this nonsense is making me reconsider my position. McCain himself used the same ‘lipstick on a pig’ phrase talking about Hillary Clinton’s health care plan. And now, with his latest ad which makes the ridiculous claim that Obama wants kids to learn about sex before they learn to read, I’m am having second thoughts.
I always thought John McCain was a man of honor — still do, really — but the way he’s allowing his campaign to be run is really making me think twice about that. And to tell the truth, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for me to stay aligned with the type of idiots who revel in the trash the McCain campaign is slinging and flock to websites like this one to flaunt their own ignorance.
Clean it up, John, and show a little dignity, my fellow Republicans.

Posted by: Alex | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Wow, that’s crude Obama. Not only is she a brilliant orator and saavy politician, she’s hot! I like McCain better than Obama anyway, but he couldn’t have been talking about her, could he?

Posted by: Shawn from MARS | September 9, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

And let’s see…if McCain made a remark similar to this regarding Obama, he would be called racist. But it’s okay for these comments to be made since it’s Barack Obama, the next Moses.

Posted by: Kimberly | September 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

You people can’t be serious, can you? He’s obviously using that old expression to describe their polices. The PIG is the POLICIES, it has nothing to do with an individual. *frowns and shakes his head* Wow. Just…wow. I’m more afraid of the people voting in this country than I am of the people running it.

Posted by: Richard | September 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

For those of you that believe Obama’s comment wasn’t calculated; imagine the outrage by the left, if McCain said “it’s like putting hair plugs on a bowling ball.”

Posted by: Yeah Right | September 9, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Obama – The man who writes about HOPE.
HOPE he loses.

Posted by: Darn Hipcrit | September 9, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

“No, she’s new!” Obama said. “She hasn’t been on the scene, you know, she’s got five kids and my hat goes off to anybody who’s looking after five. I’ve got two and they tire Michelle and me out!”
Gov Palin doesn’t look tired to me. She works out and who else can meet Putin who hunts tigers on equal terms? Excuse me while I reapply my lipstick…

Posted by: AmericanWoman | September 9, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

All of you democrats are sure showing your intelligence tonight, Congratulations.

Posted by: Anthony | September 9, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

And let’s see…if McCain made a remark similar to this regarding Obama, he would be called racist. But it’s okay for these comments to be made since it’s Barack Obama, the next Moses.

Posted by: Kimberly | September 9, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Turn out the lights Dems, the party’s over. McCain/Palin will win in November.

Posted by: Nobama | September 9, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Barry needs to stop talking for awhile, maybe sit a few plays out.

Posted by: GMark | September 9, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Whether he met it or not, he once again shows his inability to think on his feet. Have you ever made a similar unthinking comment around your wife or girlfriend? Look out! He just lost another 10 percent of American female voters. Keep picking on Sarah, your polls will keep dropping like a rock.

Posted by: Kent | September 9, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Wow who would have ever imagined a Democrat calling names? Tearing down? Belittling? Mocking? Guess Hillary never thought they would go after her? HAHAHAHAHAHA….I know what more of the same is. It’s the failed left and the grand order of blame.

Posted by: Talking Smack | September 9, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

By the reaction of the audience THEY ALL KNEW WHO the Pig comment was referring to, Palin. NO amount of spin will convince anyone otherwise. This is not a misinterpretation.
Obama = quagmire.

Posted by: Leo | September 9, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

The common phrase is “You can put PERFUME on a pig….” Inserting the word “lipstick” is a clear jab at Palin’s convention joke. Clever, but really stupid to say.

Posted by: Jeff S. | September 9, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Wow! Cheap shot! Well, between that and what Biden said about kids with disabilities, it can only serve the McCain/Palin ticket more votes. Keep talkin guys.

Posted by: Randel | September 9, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

may i please have my election about the issues back?

Posted by: excuse me | September 9, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Judging from the comments on both sides, the flat liners are well, but still flat liners.

Posted by: Don | September 9, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

I love it. While Mayor Palin supported the police department in Wasilla, Alaska when it charged rape victims for the cost of the forensic rape kits necessary to gather the evidence needed to prosecute the rapists. In my book she is a PIG.
Call it like it is Obama! We need to stop being drawn in by the novelty of Palin and start calling her what she is … an anti-sex education, anti-birth control, anti-abortion, anti-stem cell research, anti-evolution (pro-creationism), anti-mimimum wage, anti-equal work for equal pay — basically and ANTI-WOMAN — candidate.

Posted by: Anti-Palin 2008 | September 9, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Republicans are in a frenzy. Oh MY!
Are internal polls showing people are already bored with their superstaaaar – Pit Bull Palin? That we already lived through the Britney Drama and are ready for Obama?

Posted by: Palin Call a whaaaambulance | September 9, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Obama does not impress lately. His body language projects lack of confidence…watch him as he walks about on stage, looking down. Also…when he speaks he just doesn’t sound crisp. He sounds like he is grasping…or winging it.

Posted by: Tom | September 9, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

For all of you saying that “the lipstick/pig” line is an old saying—you are right but Barack is using it in a new context.
Gosh….libs are terrified of a smart, beautiful conservative woman. Nice to see the stripes are showing.

Posted by: orchaid34 | September 9, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I think I hear the fat lady singing.
BYE BYE OBAMA!

Posted by: Paul | September 9, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

I find Obama’s comments completely deserved and appropriate. Especially following McCain’s outrageous commercial about education. Any worthy parent knows how important it is to teach kindergartners about strangers and pedophiles – especially in urban areas.
I have lost the great respect I had for John McCain today. He is out of touch, irresponsible, and downright creepy. I wouldn’t let my daughters touch him with a ten foot pole. Unless it had a boxing glove on the end of it. What a loser.
Keep up the good work Barack! You know what early childhood development education means.
John McCain graduated barely – at the bottom of his class. He hasn’t cracked a book since 1958!

Posted by: mox | September 9, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Funny, 4 years ago Cheney used this exact line when talking about John Kerry.

Posted by: Dylan | September 9, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

If Sarah is such a pitbull, why can’t she present herself to the American people in a candid manner, especially considering we don’t even know her?
Hmm…is it because she is…CLUELESS?
As in….ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY CLUELESS? About anything other than her own family matters and values, and the drama in Wasilla?
Palin IS a lipstick on a pig candidate. She is a clueless joke.
McCain is a rotten fish. Nothing to add except more wars and more death.
McCain’s bringin back the DRAFT, BIG TIME.
He will instigate Russia into WWIII.
Don’t allow this to happen.
The last 8 years have not benefitted the American worker…and anyone who WORKS knows it. Productivity has increases on the order of several magnitudes, yet wages have been stagnant.

Posted by: boohoo | September 9, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Lip stick on a pig is still a pig. Is he stupid or what

Posted by: dianne jay | September 9, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Wow… Beating up on women… Next thing Obama will be stealing candy from babies.. It is beautiful watching the cookie crumble.

Posted by: Charles | September 9, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

“I find Obama’s comments completely deserved and appropriate. Especially following McCain’s outrageous commercial about education. Any worthy parent knows how important it is to teach kindergartners about strangers and pedophiles – especially in urban areas.
I have lost the great respect I had for John McCain today. He is out of touch, irresponsible, and downright creepy. I wouldn’t let my daughters touch him with a ten foot pole. Unless it had a boxing glove on the end of it. What a loser.
Keep up the good work Barack! You know what early childhood development education means.
John McCain graduated barely – at the bottom of his class. He hasn’t cracked a book since 1958!”
Exactly.
Obama on school grounds = talking about improving education.
McCain on school grounds = looking for next swim suit model.
The pigs are done, let’s move past the pork state of Alaska and address what the lower 48 need.

Posted by: Hans Meiser | September 9, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

My god, are Obama and Biden trying to set a world record for most stupid gaffes in one week? I understand them losing their composure with these new polls, but this is ridiculous.

Posted by: Jeff S. | September 9, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

That’s IT!
I have never sent a dime to any political party…But after that crap from Barack Hussein…I’m sending a big check to the RNC!

Posted by: Richard | September 9, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Obama is a Male Chauvinist Pig.
Atleast McCain treats women with respect. After this comment I’m voting for the only women on the ticket!

Posted by: TTT | September 9, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

WOW,Obama and Biden are loseing 10,000 votes everytime they open their mouths. What is Obama’s problem with women? First Hillary now Sarah…who is advising him on tactics and stratagey. No wonder he’s lost the female vote!!

Posted by: Ynot | September 9, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Wow… Beating up on women… Next thing Obama will be stealing candy from babies.. It is beautiful watching the cookie crumble.

Posted by: Charles | September 9, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

I was about to vote for McCain but no more, 350 members of my family and friends, all of whom were tilting towards McCain (each and every one of them independent and undecided)are now for Obama.
My whole neighborhood too!!!
That negates all those of you who switched 15 minutes back. so there!!!

Posted by: Nowbama | September 9, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Old saying or not…..that is very out of taste…
I will be surprise if he doesn’t have to apolgize for such a remark….or lose more votes

Posted by: Bill | September 9, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

You are a bunch of whiners. Fair game. Good job Obama, you have my vote! Most of you act like his comments are such an atrocity. You’ve been lied to before, and you believe, you’re being lied to again and you are again believing. Palin is not a messiah. Come out of your trance!

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 9, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

If he did not think people would make the connect with the pitbull/hockey mom lipstick comment and his pig/lipstick comment then he is just too sloppy to play world leader. VERY scary! I have FAITH (excuse my clinginess as I believe that liberals did not create the universe)that the majority of the population will vote for the party that knows evil and danger when they see it.

Posted by: BarbaraNC | September 9, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

OUTRAGED!

Posted by: Sergio | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Palin Call a whaaaambulance:
You are just upset because your messiah is dropping in the polls, lolol! Enjoy the ride downward!
Posted by: Mary Anne | Sep 9, 2008 9:22:57 PM
******************************
I’d dial back on the Messiah references when you see the extremist Republican/Sarah cult members, who see her as their own special Savior;)
She’s insane, just like McCain – “soul mates” Indeed!

Posted by: Palin Call a whaaaambulance | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Go Obama go!!! what a great change I didn’t think you could do it but boy are you changing. I guess Obama was calling the women pigs when he said “You Can Put Lipstick on a Pig, But It’s Still a Pig.” Was Obama referring to all women or was that just a term that he used affectionally. Pig Pig doesn’t sound loving to me. We have to give Obama some room because his mentor for twenty years was Reverend Wright and I think 20 years of listening to Wrigh’s ideas and sermons would leave a few rough edges on anyone.

Posted by: welrdelr | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Atleast McCain treats women with respect.
Posted by: TTT | Sep 9, 2008 9:26:29 PM
Are you kidding me, you are right.

Posted by: ? | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Cmon I am mcCain Palin supporter but it is obvious Obama is just being defensive. he is not refering to Palin. Let not act like victims here. When Mccain takes office, we are going to need the support of the left to get out of a difficult situation we are in. Lets not polarize the country even more.

Posted by: jamie | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Cmon I am mcCain Palin supporter but it is obvious Obama is just being defensive. he is not refering to Palin. Let not act like victims here. When Mccain takes office, we are going to need the support of the left to get out of a difficult situation we are in. Lets not polarize the country even more.

Posted by: jamie | September 9, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Go Obama go!!! what a great change I didn’t think you could do it but boy are you changing. I guess Obama was calling the women pigs when he said “You Can Put Lipstick on a Pig, But It’s Still a Pig.” Was Obama referring to all women or was that just a term that he used affectionally. Pig Pig doesn’t sound loving to me. We have to give Obama some room because his mentor for twenty years was Reverend Wright and I think 20 years of listening to Wrigh’s ideas and sermons would leave a few rough edges on anyone.

Posted by: welrdelr | September 9, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

I am not an Obama supporter nor a democrat. In fairness, Obama was referring to McCains programs, not Palin…

Posted by: Phil | September 9, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

It looks like coming up with cute remarks for speeches is “above his pay grade.” Leave it to the profesional teleprompter writers Barry, you are killing yourself.

Posted by: Jeff S. | September 9, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

As a gun owning,religion clinging, angry, democrat from pennsylvania, my party has crossed the line. Please, Joe Biden? Ppl keep saying that Sarah Palin is hiding, were is two time loser Joe Biden been? I have’nt heard a peep out of him. DEMOCRATS FOR MCCAIN/PALIN UNITE!!!!!!

Posted by: BOB | September 9, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

It looks like Obama is tired and frustrated. He is now resorting to personal insults and not just one or two. This may fire up his base, but certainly will alienate those in the middle. Precisely those he needs to win this election.
It is really sad to see how vile some of these posts have become. However, with Obama’s personal attacks heating up, it probably won’t stop anytime soon.
While McCain*Pailin have made some attacks against Obama, they clearly do NOT have the same degree of animosity.

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

It is difficult to believe that someone of this caliber is running for president. He calls a woman who is far more accomplished than he is, a pig? I guess this is the “change” that has been promised.

Posted by: Marcus | September 9, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

These moronic comments by Obama may result in Mac/Palin beating Reagan’s record landslide victories in ’80 and ’88.

Posted by: Norino's | September 9, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Beautiful! Go ahead and use McCain and Cheney’s own words against them. After all the outrageous statements the Republican attack dogs have thrown at the Dems, turnabout is fair play. But we all know the Repubs can dish it but not take it. Always crying you hurt my feelings, you’re unpatriotic, you’re mean…boo hoo.

Posted by: ken | September 9, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

I would like to add this:
What Palin said about “community organizer” has a DEEP connotation attached to it. Most famous community organizers are and were African American leaders. The way she said it was a combination of ridicule and yes, Senator Obama fits to that group. People are not stupid not to comprehend this.

Posted by: stclaire for Obama08 | September 9, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Does the Messiah Obama even get it? “Lipstick on a pig”!
After this 24 hour news cycle is over, look for a magnitude 10 earthquake to hit this country! The ground movement will not be under our feet, but over our heads as the women of this country unite to squash the Messiah and his poodle Biden.
Lipstick on a pig! I can hear the ground moving now…..outta here!

Posted by: Art M | September 9, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

So, how’s that high road campaign working out for you? Whether he meant to imply Gov. Palin or not, it was a stupid, stupid thing to say. It’s always an interesting thing to see when ‘Crats complain about negativity and character assassination. Oh well, what can you expect of people who whine about “Swift-boating” while at the same moment trying to slip forged documents into GWs military record? It’s almost as laughable as their accusations of incompetence or intellectual deficiency — it’s a childish insult that they… well, let’s just say they don’t have much leverage to make judgements on others mental accuity. As Sen. Obama and many on this board demonstrate.

Posted by: David | September 9, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Obama is losing it. I was undecided a week ago but I’m slowly creeping towards McCain. I’m not a big McCain fan, but Obama is showing he’s not up to the job. He looks desperate, he should stick to issues.

Posted by: Jake Reed | September 9, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Wow! My jaw is on the floor. Did he just say that?!?!

Posted by: mediaheartsobama | September 9, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

I guess if you are getting hammered on the real issues and you have dreadful positions (raise taxes, encourage military defeat) all you have left are childish slams against your opponent.
What’s next “my dad, who has fathered eight kids with 7 different hos will beat up your daddy”?
Pathetic.

Posted by: Richard Haug | September 9, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I have never seen a pres. ticket go up by more than +20%, but it just might happen for McCain/Palin if this Obama meltdown continues. Every day I think it can;t get any worse, but it does. This meltdown will go down in political history.

Posted by: Jeff S. | September 9, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

You want to trust someone to a nation when they get tired from just 2 kids???
What a wuss. I have never seen such a puppet before like Oblahma!

Posted by: Joel | September 9, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

TRUTH: “Were” even??!! I rest my case!

Posted by: Audacity | September 9, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

This should come as no suprise to the educated voter. Obama is a bigot and a sexist and wouldn’t have a chance if he were a white man having been in the church he attended for over 20 years. The hatred his pastor spewed from the pulpit by saying that white people created aides to kill blacks.
I ordered 10 bumper stickers from the McCain Campaign store today, I’ve never did that before. I also sent for my out of state ballot to make sure McCain and Palin get my vote.
Obama has shown his true colors and his hatred, bigotry and sexist attitude.

Posted by: Michael | September 9, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Obama has gone off the rails. He should clarify his comments – and soon – or this is going to burn him.

Posted by: Misteroundit | September 9, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Mark the time. The Obama campaign expired on Sept. 9, at 4pm in a small, bitter town in Ohio.

Posted by: MWH | September 9, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

WOW!
> “You know, you can put lipstick on a pig,” Obama said, “but it’s still a pig.” <
Amazing. Looks like Obama's hands were in the dirt from the moment Sarah Palin's name was mentioned.
Was it Obama himself posting the nasty lies on Kos?

Posted by: JOHNinKANSAS | September 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

This is amazing. Can you imagine McCain getting cut any slack for making a comment as racist as this is sexist?

Posted by: Keith | September 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

If a Republican had referred to a Democrat female pol that way, it would be all over. But then again, Obama attacked a CONSERVATIVE female, and that is acceptable to the press. RIP press freedom, it died in 2008.

Posted by: leo grapevine texas | September 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

I had a feeling the Obamamania would crumble eventually. Thank goodness it is happening BEFORE the election rather than after it.

Posted by: Jeff S. | September 9, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

I long for the day when politicians of any color and any party affiliation realize that all people want is a fair chance at getting a good education and and an even fairer chance of getting a decent job whether it be at a farm, data center, or manufacturing plant that is located in America and employs Americans. It’s that simple. The race war called for by the Philly Inquirer was a disgrace. It’s not about race…it’s about prosperity (at the family level) and safe neighborhoods but until the idiot politicians bring back the factory jobs to America we will have neither and tensions will only rise. I hate to say it but Ross Perot was right about the jobs leaving America and the social upheaval it would cause. He made a few gaffes of his own back in the day but he was right on the money with his economic theory. Mr. Obama’s not-so-transparent slurs do nothing to help the nation come together. That being said I do believe he has a fair amount of personal character but he also has poor advisers who are slowly but surely handing the election to John McCain.

Posted by: Ralph | September 9, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

Once again… context people. Have we become so naieve as a nation that we can no longer respond to context but rather to slanted, sound bites put forth by people who WANT to create a controversy. Drudge is perpetuating this and Jake Tapper’s story sets it all in motion. Are we that simplistic a nation that we can’t try to have intellgient political discourse? Pathetic.

Posted by: Albert Clementine | September 9, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

The haters and the kool aid drinkers will vote Obama no matter what. But Obama blew it big time w/ this lipstick/pig comment. People in the middle who see themselves in Sarah Palin will be offended and rightfully so. More americans relate to a small town idaho state grad who made something out of their life then they will with some brie and chablis two faced harvard law grad who talks one way in scranton and another way in frisco.

Posted by: Jim Crush | September 9, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

I do not want Obama as our president. He’s doing the very same thing that he said he would not do. He referred to John McCain as being dishonest. Obama called McCain’s campaign stupid and then called them liars. Now, he makes this sexist remark towards Sarah Palin. It’s clear Obama was talking about her. His audience applauded that line. Him and Joe Biden and many of their followers have this terrible thing against women who get in his way. Vote McCain/Palin 2008!

Posted by: Christie | September 9, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

The comment is right on. Good for Obama. It’s about time someone said it. Republicans: What frauds!!!!!

Posted by: Marci | September 9, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I am a Northwest Indiana resident with limited public speaking skills. Two years ago I heard Obama speak and said, “He has charisma, he has the ability to talk to 1000′s like he was talking to one person.” Huff and puff just went down the tubes.

Posted by: 2 years down the tubes | September 9, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I am with Obama all the way. Why are Republicans so determined to win a war when the U.S. military started in the first place? How does that make sense. We started the war, we can leave anytinme we choose. Billions of dollars a day for what?? You people tell me because I don’t understand. And neither do YOU.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

The candidate for change is just a whole lot of the same old dirty Chicago politician…Desperate people do, and say, desperate things. We are currently watching the implosion of a presidential campaign. Obama who?

Posted by: Art Chick w/Brains | September 9, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

September 09, 2008 6:10 PM – Here lie’s the remains of Obama’s presidential bid.

Posted by: Deceased | September 9, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Its funny to see some honest Democrats trying to explain what Obama really meant, to Drudge’s right wing pigs.
In history, only the GOP, Taliban and Pol pot have made a virtue of ignorance and denigrated education and educated people.
McCains daughter today proudly proclaimed that her dad was a dunce.
These are the guys that want to be in power, unbelievable!!!.

Posted by: jay | September 9, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Obama shows again he’s a chauvinist pig.

Posted by: freemort | September 9, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

LOL – I LOVE IT.
The woman compared herself to a dog already – remember the “PitBull” comment by Palin? and now the McCain\Palin ticket is whining about what Obama said.
If Sarah can’t handle a little poke in the eye from Obama – how will she ever handle Putin and the other bad guys in the world?!?!?!

Posted by: Rob | September 9, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Anyone who uses the words “pig” and “lipstick” together in relation to a political opponent knows exactly what he is doing. Especially a “Harvard” man.
With this allusion Obama has shown himself unfit for the office of President of the United States.

Posted by: Glenn Harrison | September 9, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

In the movie “Boiler Room” shady brokers used the expression “Put lipstick on the pig” when they dressed up lousy stocks to sell to a gullible public.
Seems like the perfect analogy to me– for the policies McCain is out there peddling.
McCain himself has used this expression, for Hilary’s health care policies. I guess McCain was calling Hilary a pig, and should also apologize.

Posted by: Katie O | September 9, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

LOL – I LOVE IT.
The woman compared herself to a dog already – remember the “PitBull” comment by Palin? and now the McCain\Palin ticket is whining about what Obama said.
If Sarah can’t handle a little poke in the eye from Obama – how will she ever handle Putin and the other bad guys in the world?!?!?!

Posted by: Rob | September 9, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

McCain has used the lipstick phrase, too.
Last year while criticizing health proposals from the Democratic presidential candidates, he said Hillary Rodham Clinton’s resembled the failed plan she offered as first lady during the 1990s. “I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” McCain of her proposal.

Posted by: Todd | September 9, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

What time tomorrow would you guess the apology will come? 8am? 12noon? 3pm? I’m guessing earlier rather than later. The Obama camp knows they must stop the bleeding asap.

Posted by: Jeff S. | September 9, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Obama does community service work and he is called an Elitist??!! I do not think there is anything, “elite” about the people he works with and for.
I feel if certain demographics of people have the Audacity to demand to be treated fairly and not act subservient, they will be labeled things such as an elitist.
The republicans are blatantly using fear and race in their campaign. They hope to scare folks into voting for their ticket. Since they can not answer for the past eight years and they have no clue as to what is needed, fear and race is their only option.

Posted by: Audacity | September 9, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Anyone who uses the words “pig” and “lipstick” together in relation to a political opponent knows exactly what he is doing. Especially a “Harvard” man.
With this allusion Obama has shown himself unfit for the office of President of the United States.

Posted by: Glenn Harrison | September 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Its funny to see some honest Democrats trying to explain what Obama really meant, to Drudge’s right wing pigs.
In history, only the GOP, Taliban and Pol pot have made a virtue of ignorance and denigrated education and educated people.
McCains daughter today proudly proclaimed that her dad was a dunce.
These are the guys that want to be in power, unbelievable!!!.

Posted by: klm21 | September 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Its funny to see some honest Democrats trying to explain what Obama really meant, to Drudge’s right wing pigs.
In history, only the GOP, Taliban and Pol pot have made a virtue of ignorance and denigrated education and educated people.
McCains daughter today proudly proclaimed that her dad was a dunce.
These are the guys that want to be in power, unbelievable!!!.

Posted by: klm21 | September 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Wow republicans instead of speaking of the real issues are still on their Palin Honeymoon which will last for about a week max anything Obama says now according to republicans is a shot at their darling when Mr Mccain himself himself used the exact same phrase to describe Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s health care plan just last year. “I think they put some lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig,” McCain said in October of 2007

Posted by: The Truth | September 9, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Keep Working Millions ON WELFARE DEPEND ON YOU?

Posted by: Jerry | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Keep Working Millions ON WELFARE DEPEND ON YOU?

Posted by: Jerry | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

To Albert Clementine,
I’m a McCain voter, but I hear what you’re saying. Still, what is the most unnerving thing about this to me is that Obama sounds like he has let Palin rattle him. If he does end up being Commander in Chief, I’d like to know that he can take a punch. If Sarah can rattle him, I’m more than a little concerned what Putin could do.

Posted by: MWH | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

CHA-CHING…the RNC just cashed a big check

Posted by: Richard | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Obama is putting as much heat on Palin she will never speak with the press, they say she is a pit bull why not come out of the kennel and speak without a script

Posted by: oliver | September 9, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Several posters are saying McCain is such a gentleman with regard to his treatment of women. What about his joke 10 years ago about Chelsea, Hillary,and Janet Reno? Chelsea was just 18 at the time. McCain, in a major speech at a Republican gathering, asked “Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly?”
The rest of the joke is not important; Hillary and Reno can take it. But McCain apparently thought these insults were hilarious after-dinner entertanment.

Posted by: K. M. | September 9, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Wow…I am really surprised…usually Obama thinks before he speaks…
Many people I spoke to said they saw a clear connection between “Pig” and Palin; and between an “Old Fish” and McCain.
I think Obama just lost another million women’s votes…

Posted by: democrat-in-sf | September 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Idioms, look them up. Oh wait, you don’t own a dictionary.. or any books.. back to shooting moose (what a HUNTER instinct! I can SHOOT an animal from FAR AWAY with a RIFLE! WOW! Wake me up when the.. that VP candidate can shoot a moose with a homemade bow and arrow.)

Posted by: Hans Meiser | September 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

The Drudgebots are at it again. Please disappear back into the woodwork and crawl back under your rocks.

Posted by: Ben | September 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Obama will become just as bitter as
Gore when he loses the election.
Obama’s panic du jour will be?

Posted by: Richard | September 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

so when obama was new and shiny, we were supposed to be ok, and give the man space and time to get to know him, not critique him. but now he sounds a bit jealous he is old news, and Palin is the shiny newness getting all the attention.
people say palin should get the whambulance, i think obama needs one too.
at least has a history to critique. obama just has 2 memoirs and the word “present” for his votes.

Posted by: jeff | September 9, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Hey,BO….
Who you callin’ a PIG, Dude?

Posted by: greystonebabe | September 9, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

This campaign is sooo emotionally charged, kinda frightening at times… Yeah, often I miss old school academic discourse, but then…there’s this! Can’t miss out on this gem! It makes me just fall in love with America all over again, and the fact that our bombs don’t cause loss of life or limb, they just lose candidates votes.

Posted by: Lucy | September 9, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

We use this expression in our business a lot, and it refers to a practice, not the person practicing it. He is saying that no matter how you dress the platforms of McCain and Palin, they are what they are. I cannot believe the outrage over this when Palin was on a radio show laughing because her former opposition was called a “cancer”, referring to the fact the woman had cancer.
What makes all this worse is how the rednecks on this post are coming out with cruel and personal attacks on Obama’s color. These are probably the same people who would tuck their tails between their legs if someone they knew found out what they were writing. It is sad how anonymity brings out all of the true hatred and unrest in this country.
I for one am glad Obama is stepping it up. He and Biden have been raked over the coals by this lying, (I didnt support the bridge to nowhere, when in fact she asked for money to be earmarked for this budget)nasty draconian woman. She is setting back the womens movement, not bringing it forward.
So indeed you can’t put lipstick on a pig. Sarah Palin’s record, beliefs and choices are astoundingly extreme.

Posted by: tricia | September 9, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

REALITY CHECK.
==============
Obama is losing his status as front-
runner in the polls……His numbers
go down everyday….He’s despair….
He will use any negative campaign…
but he won’t succeed…..
I left the democratic party when
Hillary dropped-out from the race….
I WON’T GO BACK…..
The democratic party is under control
from blacks and left wing radicals….
DNC didn’t listen to the voters…
DNC will pay the price in november…
JOHN McCAIN/SARAH PALIN ’08
COUNTRY FIRST……….

Posted by: Nicholas | September 9, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Hmmm. His two kids tire him and Michelle out? Well, how is he going to be president then? Oh wait. I got it. He’s gunna talk like a president, Can’t you just hear him now. “Change, Change, Change. And let me tell you one more thing thing: Present.”

Posted by: Michael Lofrano | September 9, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Obama has definitely a point there. The whole republican party and their candidates are ‘pigs’ and their ‘change lipstick’ will not change the fact.
I pray every day that not only Obama will become President, but also that Congress will become Democratic. Its high time to relieve the whole party currently in power.
McCain/Palin are and were part of this disastrous party machine and whatever they call it, there is not going to be a change with them in power.
Also, women are NOT going en masse to vote for Palin. Any women with brains will see through this charade easily.

Posted by: Angry | September 9, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

It has been what? Two weeks since Sarah made her now famous lipstick comparison.
———-
Its been six days (not two weeks)since Palin made her LIPSTICK comment. Nice try at spin, we are not stupid. The audience knew what Obama meant. And so does Drudge and the rest of the sane world.
Obama is DONE. He is in a quagmire and needs an exist strategy.

Posted by: Leo | September 9, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Palin is such a classy lady. I have hope now that McCain will be elected. This last week has been very good for their campaign. This story has more comments than any other that I can remember. Obama’s comments obviously hit a nerve and they won’t be forgotten very soon.

Posted by: Bruce | September 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Mrs. Palin, echoing the theme of humility, made this moral declaration during her acceptance speech: “We are expected to govern with integrity, good will, clear convictions and a servant’s heart.”
In contrast are the mounting criticisms from the left that couldn’t be more condescending, divisive, cynical, downright arrogant and anything but humble.
This Independent is voting Republican!

Posted by: Susan | September 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

That’s gonna leave a mark… on Obama. This remark, and his “My Muslim Faith” remark aint pretty. He’s been a perfect orator for months, but his cracks are starting to show.

Posted by: Tom | September 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

ALRIGHT!
“You know, you can put lipstick on a pig,” Obama said, “but it’s still a pig.”
That just shattered Palins infantile speech to smithereens.

Posted by: Andrea | September 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

You know what, these comments are disgusting. The lack of compassion and understanding demonstrated from both sides is sick. If Obama didn’t mean it that way, he (or someone on his staff) still should have been smart enough not to say it. People attacking her or her children or because they come from a rural area is a new low…It seems many posting here hate first and look for excuses for their hate later.

Posted by: RSV | September 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Obama DID NOT call Palin a pig. He used a common phrase. You all can’t be serious in thinking otherwise!

Posted by: jackie_m | September 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

If some of the Obama supporters are not worried about his comments, then why defend him. Humm. Obama has no tolerance for his opponents that disagree with him. He’s belittling himself- reducing himself as no statesman by attacking Palin. She can handle it. What the Obama supporters don’t understand, is that the public didn’t like this remark. Palin hasn’t said anything about Obama that wasn’t true. Obama is just angry that this woman is getting the better of him. Too funny. I can’t wait until Sarah takes Joe Biden on. “Go, Sarah!”

Posted by: Christie | September 9, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

lutz…
In ANY issues of NATIONAL defense, Palin isn’t even briefed. The more you know…

Posted by: Hans Meiser | September 9, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

So apparently Obama has taken off the gloves! Oh how he’ll rue the day he did! If that’s how he wants to play, he’s got no shot …. here come the Republicans, and they are not happy! And they are bringing a heck of a lot more than you brought! Enjoy your 15 mins of fame Obama!!!

Posted by: D'Obama | September 9, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Now, now boys and girls, can we all just get along? People who like lies, corruption and war will vote for McCain, and those of us who realize God created al races,and are smart enough to not want more years of corruption, greed, and no accountability in govenment, will vote for Obama. Racism is sooo ugly, but I am proud of the many Americans who are choosing…how shall we say, COUNTRY FIRST (over racism) and our nations future, voting for Obama, instead of John McCain… Every thinking American (not motivated by greed or racism), must have known this campaign was going to ge nasty. Repbulicans want to keep POWER, and Obama is a black man. So..this is an ugly but NECESSARY process for the growth of our nation. After the dust settles, the people will speak. WE THE PEOPLE… so for those who are counting on racism to save the day.. I think you are going to be sorely disappointed. You just wait and see. Yes we can… Because we must. Future generations are counting on us.

Posted by: andersting | September 9, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Barry may have put the final nail in the DEM coffin.
To the average DEM, the Founding Fathers were Right Wing Radicals.

Posted by: GMark | September 9, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

It’s unfortunate that many people have to classify themselves as either liberal or conservative and even more unfortunate that politics is all about “us versus them”. We’re not going to move forward until the mud slinging stops and the politicians shut up about how they’re better than the other person and actually talk about what their plans look like. When you actually talk to a person about what they think on issues without mentioning political party and with a listening ear, you find that we are all more on the same page than you might think.

Posted by: Annoyed | September 9, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Republicans are crazy. They actually think that Democrats will withdraw support for the “pig” comment. Tomorrow I will have a great laugh at work about the “pig” comment. This makes me want to vote for Obama even more just for the drama. In fact, I might just contribute more money to his campaign. Keep them coming. More cracks, more money. Obama supporters are loving this.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Obama will CHANGE NOTHING he is a product of the CHICAGO DEMOCRAT MACHINE run by the Daleys for the past 50 years. The most corrupt politicians in the US are out of Chicago.Here is an excerpt from an NPR article about The younger Daley,”Daley did not seek to be chairman of the Cook County Democratic Party, a position his father used to control politics and government from the courts to the state capitol to Congress. His father’s machine doled out lower level offices, jobs and political favors in exchange for loyalty. The younger Daley’s machine rewards loyalty, too, often with jobs and favors — his last patronage chief, Robert Sorich, is now in a federal prison after being convicted last year on corruption charges — but this Daley keeps a further distance from the inner workings of his machine.” Obama is a product of these types of political payoff just ask Tony Rezko another Obama contributor in the Federal Pen. He’s a phony and a hypocrit, just like all the rich Democrats, money is evil unless it’s theirs.

Posted by: Richard Z | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Action items from Obama daily campaign strategy session, Tues. 9/9:
* Joe – Insult parents of special needs kids who are against embryonic stem cell research.
* Obama – Compare McCain to an old fish, and compare Palin to a pig with lipstick.

Posted by: MWH | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Obama is nothing more than a chauvinist pig! We saw the way he treated Hillary and now this! He is really starting to snap under pressure. I’m so glad that Americans are finally waking up to see his true colors!

Posted by: Alexix | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

The lipstick analogy was too clever by half. Careful big guy. You just might make these attacks too personal and alienate a lot of voters you are counting on.

Posted by: KG1 | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Obama for change? That’s a hoot. The only thing we’ve learned from this and him flipping off Hillary Clinton is that the man has the unmanly trait of being passive aggressive.
This is a man who can’t even convince Hillary to campaign for him and we’re supposed to believe he can diplomatically convince the Iranians to give up their nuclear dreams?
Barak Obama is hilariously campaigning against the bottom of the GOP ticket because his service to the country cannot not measure up to McCain’s.

Posted by: w3bgrrl | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

What a cheap shot from Obama, and what a window into his character. He’s an elitist that when not granted his wishes on a silver platter spews out insult, incapable of reasoned debate.
It’s a joy to see him decompose and self-destroy.

Posted by: Ricardo Rivera | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

What happens if McCain uses the old phrase calling a spade a spade about Obama’s Socialized Programs.

Posted by: AnyHeadline is a Good Headline | September 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Obama fights back a little bit and the GOP cries “foul!” What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Oh wait, maybe that could be interpreted as sexist…
Give it a rest McCain supporters. Your 15 minutes of fame and a post-convention boost are OVER.

Posted by: spudmctater | September 9, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

RE:
“OBAMA just said exactly what needed to be said. The truth. And its hurts. Sorry…”
Yep, that’s right. It hurts OBAMA’s campaign.
The tide has turned. It’s amusing to watch all the “progressive” ones degenerate. The election is all but OVER largely due to Palin’s likability. So go on, keep up your feeble attacks; it’s only going to tee off the people that like her, not change their minds. Got to love the liberal playbook.

Posted by: fred garvin | September 9, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Posted by: Andrea
That just shattered Palins infantile speech to smithereens.
Just admitted Obama was talking about her when Obama said he wasn’t. Busted.

Posted by: Christie | September 9, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

RE:
“OBAMA just said exactly what needed to be said. The truth. And its hurts. Sorry…”
Yep, that’s right. It hurts OBAMA’s campaign.
The tide has turned. It’s amusing to watch all the “progressive” ones degenerate. The election is all but OVER largely due to Palin’s likability. So go on, keep up your feeble attacks; it’s only going to tee off the people that like her, not change their minds. Got to love the liberal playbook.

Posted by: fred garvin | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Obama is so CLASSY (not). Just keep talking and the McCain/Palin fans will have nothing to worry about.

Posted by: Jan | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Have any of you folks ever been to Ketchikan – site of the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere?” The cost of that bridge may have been excessive – thanks to the corrupt bunch that was running Alaska before Palin, but that bridge really is needed. Ketchikan, the town, is on one side of the inlet in an incredibly beautiful setting and the town’s jet airport (and emergency services connection to British Columbia, the lower 48, or north to Anchorage) is across the navigable inlet on a very sparsely-populated, long, thin island. Only 50 or so people live on that island with the airport (and the family of the previous governor of AK – the one Palin defeated – owns land adjacent to where the bridge would go, hence the term Bridge to Nowhere, but Ketchikan across the inlet is a pretty good-sized burg (for SE) Alaska. I suspect if you ask Palin (and most Alaskans) they will say that a bridge should eventually be built there to connect to the airport – this is a remote area by East Coast standards though not by those of AK and it is going to need continuing investment in infrastructure to grow, but as I understand it their position now is, “if we need it, we’ll pay for it.” A minor aside to all of you; your good friend Mr. Obama voted FOR the $$ for this project.

Posted by: CA resident | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Have any of you folks ever been to Ketchikan – site of the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere?” The cost of that bridge may have been excessive – thanks to the corrupt bunch that was running Alaska before Palin, but that bridge really is needed. Ketchikan, the town, is on one side of the inlet in an incredibly beautiful setting and the town’s jet airport (and emergency services connection to British Columbia, the lower 48, or north to Anchorage) is across the navigable inlet on a very sparsely-populated, long, thin island. Only 50 or so people live on that island with the airport (and the family of the previous governor of AK – the one Palin defeated – owns land adjacent to where the bridge would go, hence the term Bridge to Nowhere, but Ketchikan across the inlet is a pretty good-sized burg (for SE) Alaska. I suspect if you ask Palin (and most Alaskans) they will say that a bridge should eventually be built there to connect to the airport – this is a remote area by East Coast standards though not by those of AK and it is going to need continuing investment in infrastructure to grow, but as I understand it their position now is, “if we need it, we’ll pay for it.” A minor aside to all of you; your good friend Mr. Obama voted FOR the $$ for this project.

Posted by: CA resident | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

To those of you trying to do damage control by saying McCain spoke the same thing about HRC: Context is everything. HRC had not just used “lipstick” to describe herself, and clearly McCain’s jab was regarding HRC policies. In this case, Palin had just used (less than 1 week ago) the “lipstick” statement about herself to describe the difference between a pit-bull and a hocky-mom. For BO to use the reference now (…. like putting lipstick on a pig) means one of two things: Either A) BO is totally clueless (not a good trait in a future US President or B) BO meant exactly what he said and is quite rude and down-right crude. Take your pick Obamabots… As for me and my house, we choose McCain / Palin in 08!

Posted by: Greg | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Jeff wrote @9:40
I am with Obama all the way. Why are Republicans so determined to win a war when the U.S. military started in the first place? How does that make sense. We started the war, we can leave anytinme we choose. Billions of dollars a day for what?? You people tell me because I don’t understand. And neither do YOU.
Jeff, I’ll type this slowly so youcan understand.
1. We, the AMERICAN people Should be determined to win the war because that’s the objective of the war, winning. You don’t shop for a car with the intent of walking do ya? If so, I’ve got an ’86 Yugo for you to look at.
2. The Military did not start this war. The Military did not start ANY wars. Wars are STARTED by governments, and CARRIED-OUT by armies.
3. Unlike a party, you can’t just leave a war. Not without defeating the enemy. If you think you can, I suggest the following experiment. Go to the nearest biker-bar, find the biggest, meanest guy in there, throw a punch and declare “I’m leaving now.” and time how long it takes for you to be spitting teeth out of your mouth.
4. As for the cost, I heard on CNN today that the cost is running at about $10 Billion a month. Not exactly small change, but nowhere near “Billions of dollars a day…”. As far as the what for, if you aren’t aware of the 17 violated U.N. resolutions following the Gulf War, I suggest you look them up.
In short, don’t come to a gun fight with a butter knife.

Posted by: Snocrash | September 9, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

I am not going to speculate whether Obama meant to attack Gov Palin with the “Lipstick” comment. But if he is as smart as everyone makes him out to be then he should have known that this comment would be seen as an attack. Maybe when he started the line he didn’t mean to go after Palin but then you can see as he said it he paused like he was thinking if he should continue and decided to finish the line anyway. Bad timing? Bad judgment? You make the call.

Posted by: Sheya | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

I am not going to speculate whether Obama meant to attack Gov Palin with the “Lipstick” comment. But if he is as smart as everyone makes him out to be then he should have known that this comment would be seen as an attack. Maybe when he started the line he didn’t mean to go after Palin but then you can see as he said it he paused like he was thinking if he should continue and decided to finish the line anyway. Bad timing? Bad judgment? You make the call.

Posted by: Sheya | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Obama will CHANGE NOTHING he is a product of the CHICAGO DEMOCRAT MACHINE run by the Daleys for the past 50 years. The most corrupt politicians in the US are out of Chicago.Here is an excerpt from an NPR article about The younger Daley,”Daley did not seek to be chairman of the Cook County Democratic Party, a position his father used to control politics and government from the courts to the state capitol to Congress. His father’s machine doled out lower level offices, jobs and political favors in exchange for loyalty. The younger Daley’s machine rewards loyalty, too, often with jobs and favors — his last patronage chief, Robert Sorich, is now in a federal prison after being convicted last year on corruption charges — but this Daley keeps a further distance from the inner workings of his machine.” Obama is a product of these types of political payoff just ask Tony Rezko another Obama contributor in the Federal Pen. He’s a phony and a hypocrit, just like all the rich Democrats, money is evil unless it’s theirs.

Posted by: Richard Z | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Of course if Obama were Republican and Palin Democrat the media and liberals would be calling for his withdrawal from the campaign, all his money, his first born child etc.

Posted by: cp1017 | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Palin would have to resign her post as VP candidate if she had made a racist comment as his “lipstick” comment.

Posted by: Betsy | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

democrats still have time to replace Obama as their candidate. He is much dumber than I first thought.

Posted by: John Doe | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Hey, Jackie M: would you dismiss it as “just a common expression” if Sarah Palin or John McCain happened to slip into one of their speeches “let’s call a spade a spade”? (Of course, Hillary DID say that Barack Obama hadn’t yet “done the spadework” in the Senate to be qualified for the Presidency — think that was an accidental word choice, or just a “common expression”?)

Posted by: Stuart Creque | September 9, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Alexix come on, Hillary first of all is no comparison to this moose hunter and her “first dude”. Secondly, Hillary lost fair and square because she was arrogant before super tuesday and had no plans in place. Lastly, let’s just consider this: Gov. Palin wants to dish it out, bigtime, see her convention speech which was nothing but bloody red meat for the idiots. Now they can’t take Sen. Obama using a phrase that Sen. McCain ALREADY used.
You know, that’s weak, it really is. I’m not saying it’s a great comment from Sen. Obama, but the sexist charge does accomplished and smart women NO favor. Let Gov. Palin fight; she made her bed, let her lay in it.

Posted by: Leslie | September 9, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

jay, the welfare argument was fought in 1996 and won by your side. Republicans controlled both houses, Clinton needed to get re-elected, and welfare in this country as we used to know it almost completely disappeared. Congratulations. That does mean, however, that you don’t get to use welfare queens and food stamp crack addicts as talking points in 2008. Wake up and smell the 21st century.

Posted by: the guy | September 9, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

What do the half of Obama’s family that are Muslims think about pigs?

Posted by: sallymae | September 9, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

This is nonsensical and cry baby mongering at best, why isn’t McCain complaining about fish?
“You can put lipstick on a pig, it’s still a pig. You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still going to stink after eight years.”

Posted by: John | September 9, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Obama is for change, that is why he is doing the old political method of trashing your opponent, calling them a liar and then saying how their opponent is pulling dirty tricks on him … the issues .. who wants to discuss issues, Obama the man for change who has a 35 year veteran of the senate as his VP won’t discuss issues, he can only infer his opponents are pigs. You aren’t going to win many elections slandering your opponent, of course Obama has not won very many elections.

Posted by: Big T | September 9, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Will Obama cry when he loses this election? I think he will cry like a little baby!

Posted by: Rikky | September 9, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

What’s the matter? McCain/Palin can’t take a little friendly banter? Sounds like someone started to believe their own hype and lost their sense of humor.
Why did McCain/Palin feel the need to co-opt change? Here’s a thought – let’s list the things that happen during a Republican presidency shall we?
1. 9/11, America’s worst terrorist attack. GWB had plenty of warning and failed to act.
2. Housing market tanks. Again, plenty of warning but failure to act.
3. Oil prices skyrocket. See above.
4. Economy suffers. Sensing a pattern here.
5. Horrific natural disasters – Hurricanes Katrina/Rita, tsunamis, etc.,Mother Nature is an independent.
6. Oh, yeah…WAR!!! ‘Nuff said.
See kids, Republicans will only bring you poverty, death and destruction. Middle America – I’m talking to you.
Oh, and just a note to you fine middle-class folks so enamored of Sarah Palin. Give some thought to who creates the jobs in this country. Clue: lots of them have college degrees – some from (gasp!) Harvard! Don’t be so quick to start a cultural war between the salt-of-the-earth and the upper crust. There’s a food chain in America and those folks ahead of you are making sure you still get fed.

Posted by: Bemused | September 9, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

This is the best and the brightest guy the dems have to offer?

Posted by: TC | September 9, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Anyone that actually believes that dinosaurs walked the earth a mere 4,000 years ago and that they should be considered “lizards from Satan”, and believes that the earth was created in literally 7 days should kindly stay as far away from society as possible. Preferrably in places like, say, Alaska? We don’t need anymore sociopaths walking our streets.

Posted by: patrick | September 9, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

I was reading these comments and was shocked by the number of fools out there still calling Obama a muslim. He is not, nor ever has been. So he slipped up and said, “my muslim faith”. All of the racists, and people who had no real ammo against Obama rubbed their ignorant hands together and thought, “Hee Hee, that thar man jest screwed up an’ Ima gonna repeat what he said til peoples decide not to vote fer him because of it.”
People actually forwarded that stupid email ages ago supporting his “muslim” faith. This was proven incorrect by many, many people and has a place on the snopes website now.

Posted by: Neil | September 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Amazing. The phrase Barak Obama used is nothing new — it’s been around for decades… many many decades.
AND, justly illustrates the basic point of the Republican ‘change’ campaign — that you can use the word and spin the facts but it’s still McCain and the Bush agenda if he’s put into office.
Eight years of crap.. and people willing order another 4 year serving???

Posted by: RDavis | September 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Obama also said that Hillary CLAWS come out when she PERIODICALLY *feels down.*
Ya, OBAMA, we HEAR YOUR SEXIST BULL****.
Brush your shoulders off, flip the bird again, 99 problems but a b**** aint one, and your fundraiser Luda, “irrelevant b****.”
That’s just my phone vibrating sweetie, don’t want you thinking I’m getting fresh.
Obama, are you a SEXIST or do you just hate WHITE WOMEN????????????????

Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Wow is this what America needs in a president..one who can reduced himself to childish school yard slander..shame on you Obama!

Posted by: Lynda | September 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Obama is self destructing!

Posted by: Rodney Latham | September 9, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

I thought Obama had 1/2 a brain there for a little bit

Posted by: doh! | September 9, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

McCain used the same phrase a while back…Jesus! Is everything said about PALIN going to be called sexist?

Posted by: beap | September 9, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

The bad news is, there’ a lot of angry left wingers here whining.
The good news?
They’ll have another four years to do it come November.
You can put lipstick on a terrorist or racist preacher…

Posted by: TheMadKing | September 9, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

How sad. Wasn’t Obama the guy who was going to run a “clean” campaign against the “dirty tricks” clintons? The pig comment is pathetic. If you can’t see the connection to Palin, you shouldn’t be voting. Looks like Obama is grasping for breath and a lifeline as he is going under. How sad indeed.

Posted by: Dazed and confused | September 9, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

I am a woman who up until now was an undecided voter. Not anymore. I am voting for McCain and Palin and the Democrats have no one to blame but the good Senator himself.

Posted by: LG | September 9, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Is this “perceived whining” coming out of the McCain campaign? Didn’t Palin criticize Hilary for the same thing?
Yes– except in Hilary’s case she wasn’t making something up. This charge against Obama is pure flim flam. Laughable.
And even if Obama did call Palin and/or McCain a pig– what’s the matter– can’t handle it?

Posted by: Katie O | September 9, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Obamma>>>> Please,Please you are absolutely on the right track with you’re new attacks. The only thing that might assure us more gains in the polls and a sure win in November is to get a bit more vulgar. But you are certainly off to a good start. Thank You, Thank You, Thank You. Please do not let up. Tomorrow is a new day call her something worse come on boy you can do it. If you get stuck, call Rev. Wright I’m sure he could help you come up with something more original.

Posted by: Proud to be on the Right | September 9, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

You can put lipstick on a right wing conservative fundimentalist, but that doesn’t mean they’re a moral or clear thinking person.

Posted by: Timothy | September 9, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

I thought he had more class than that.

Posted by: Sid | September 9, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

How dare he pick on that lying, thieving, ignorant, book-banning zealot who’s been attacking him non stop.

Posted by: J | September 9, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

And Obama is the guy who is supposedly going to bring change and live above politics as usual. Yeah right…Obama, each day you sound more and more like worn out politics of the past. People are wising up to your ways and you are showing yourself as you really are.

Posted by: Dems Losers | September 9, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Wake up people. The title of this article, and the “context” of this sentance says it all:
Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said of what Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is offering.
“That’s not change. You know, you can put lipstick on a pig,” Obama said, “but it’s still a pig.”

Posted by: Anna Beth | September 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Hello, this is a common British expression that when something is ugly, lipstick won’t fix it. Nothing more than that. The Right’s only way to the White House is to tear Obama down – not run on their own issues. now that’s character…

Posted by: British Expression | September 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

This man-child is out of his league. A voice in his head (not his ego) should have warned him not to say that, because it might offend women, which he seems to be losing in spades.
Obama couldn’t get elected to a PTA.

Posted by: Sammy | September 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

And now he supports the “No Child Left Behind” program as well? Can anyone say Barack Obush?!?

Posted by: John | September 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Obama wants us to believe that he can be the leader of the free world, yet he cannot run his political machine without tele-a-promters and personal attacks. Does it seem strange that the financial advisor for Obama quits, then calls Palin an unfit mother and her child something less than approiate one day after Obama states Children are off limits.
My mind is made up, I cannot let an idiot like this Jr. Senator into the White House.

Posted by: Steve | September 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

All the people that post on here against Obama are just old, angry uptight white folks who can’t stand the idea of new ideas or having a leader that doesn’t look like them. Poor, little fearful babies – only John McCain can protect you from the scary terrorists out to get you?
You’d rather get caught up worrying about stuff that means nothing than seize a real opportunity to change. Obama is light years more intelligent than McCain and Palin combined.
And how comes no one ever talks about what really happened to John McCain as a POW? Did he give away classified info that led to more of our soldiers getting killed? Was he tortured to the point of long-term brain damaged? Was he sodomized? If so, did he enjoy it?

Posted by: Scott | September 9, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

OK, it has to be some kind of “fake’ or “lie” message. Obama could not have said anything involving “lipstick” and “a pig,” intimating a reference to a Republican woman candidate. If that was to be true, it would be one of the most sexist, ugly things a presidential candidate could say about a woman. And, of course, Mr. Obama would never, ever say any such thing, would he?

Posted by: april41 | September 9, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

My choice is quite easy when I consider a demonstrable war hero vs. a Chicago Politician.
“A vote for McCain is a vote for 4 more years of Bush” is historically provable hogwash.
Historically, McCain has been a thorn in Bush’s side. Some republicans have called him disloyal because he has “reached across the aisle” many times. He is no stranger to attempts at political reformation.
Obama has only a history of supporting the democratic machine and no acts of political reformation.

Posted by: JesseDewey | September 9, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

I’m voting for McCain/Palin and I think this is a non issue. I’ve used that pig phrase a million times in the past and I don’t think Obama was calling her a pig, and even if he was, so what? Let’s talk policy and voting records.

Posted by: Bob | September 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

“Just wow… The democrats ALREADY control congress. Both houses. Have for two years.”
And they haven’t done a darn thing and have the WORSE approval rating ever. That’s what you get with the Democrats in control. Do we really want more of that?
I don’t think so.

Posted by: It's Me | September 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

I’m for McCain/Palin but give Obama a pass here. I, for one, do not believe that it is in his nature to make such a comment. With 56 days before the election can we find something better to talk about than Palin’s daughter’s baby–oh, wait that was last week’s media creation–and whether or not Obama called Palin a pig. Our nation is going down the drain but it isn’t because of McCain or Bush or Palin or Obama or Biden it is because the media sensationalizes the ridiculous and skips the real story. They skip the issues because they think we don’t care, they don’t care or they think we are too stupid to care. The media has not allowed this campaign to be about issues. If you want to learn more about the issues, you’ll have to dig for them. The media has turned this into some damned high school popularity contest and no matter who wins we all lose. Lies, half-truths and spin that is all we hear anymore, and I don’t care if it is coming from Limbaugh, the Daily Kos, NPR, Fox News or MSNBC in the end we get the same thing an prostituted version of everything that happens around us.

Posted by: Thomas Cline | September 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

game, set, match. Thanks Barry!!!

Posted by: Bill | September 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Oh please!!!! Give me a break! Why is the media playing into McCain and the Repubs sexism card? Why when these right-wing misfits cry their crocodile tears calling sexism the media just eats it up – have some dignity media. First of all you emphasize the lipstick/pig part but what about the rest of Sen. Obama statement when he also referred to an old saying abut fish/newspaper… why aren’t you blowing that sentence up too? Why are you further mentioning McCain using a similar phrase when describing Hillary’s health care plan? This is really silly season in politics and they media is in full bloom for a story. Good grief tell us about issues!!!

Posted by: Rant3000 | September 9, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

A little respect, please. Remember Porky? Babe? Freddie the Pig Detective? A pig, when not ground into sausage or sizzling as bacon next to the flapjacks or being cut bone from gristle into Spam, is an intelligent creature that may indeed have a soul that may live to forgive you.

Posted by: Michael | September 9, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

America wants to fail.

Posted by: Jim | September 9, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

McCain used the same phrase a while back…Jesus! Is everything said about PALIN going to be called sexist?
Posted by: beap | Sep 9, 2008 10:07:55 PM
*************************************
Yes.
It’s their “stategery.
She repeats lies in stump speech, throws zingers, refers to herself as a dog, then cries wolf when Obama using a common phrase and then hides.
I think it is pitiful. It makes me laugh that this is The superstar AKA Barracuda, the Republicans are relying on to SAVE them.
And the delicious irony is that Hillary has been a target for 20 yrs and Palin had the nerve to call Hillary a whiner during the primary too. LMAO
Pity party anyone?

Posted by: Palin Call a whaaaambulance | September 9, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

If Obama and Biden can’t confront Palin square on…having to hide behind innuendos, how is going to take on some “female” president or priminster??? What a wimp! Just come out and attack her record. Oh wait…you need your mini army of 30 lawers to dig up dirt on her in Alaska. Just ask Hillary…I bet she already has a complete dosier on her. You should have access to all the public records on her performance everyone else does. I guess you don’t have anything else but cheap shots. What happened to the “clean” campaign? You just lost my vote.

Posted by: It doesn't add up | September 9, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Obama has over 300 people handling him. There isn’t a sentence that he speaks that hasn’t been vetted many times over, so I don’t think there are any coincidences in whatever he says.
But, who cares anyway. Sara Barracuda hasn’t objected to anything Obama has said.
I think she knows what to expect from liberals and the MSM.
Obama’s latests jabs are just another sign of a desperate campaign sliding into panic mode.
Obama may win the election, but I think all of you think he’s going to bring change to politics are in for a rude shock–or maybe you know in your heart this is about power; not change.

Posted by: FMB501 | September 9, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Hillary would have been the best choice no doubt. These two dudes are miserable for the Democrats. Barack and Biden We want Hillary.

Posted by: Don Reinhardt | September 9, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

This is the best and brightest the dem party has to offer?

Posted by: TC | September 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Somebody quick! Get that man a telepromter!

Posted by: Sandy | September 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Hey all you Republicans who think this phrase was a sexist jab at Sarah Palin! Check out the book, Lipstick on a Pig: Winning In the No-Spin Era by Someone Who Knows the Game, by one of your own, Torie Clark. The Lipstick on a Pig chapter talks about the Keating Five scandal.
Pop quiz: Which current presidential candidate once hired Tori Clark to be his press secretary? (Hint: He’s the only candidate who was one of the Keating Five, initials JM.)

Posted by: googleman | September 9, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I am utterly shocked at the mentality of the people who defend Obama, and the only south he knows is the south-side of Chicago. He runs with the new class of pigs,they are called thugs. Now not all people in Chicago put up with these thugs. His friend the mayor they call Fat Albert, thought he was above the law. just signed a deal for less jail time. Chicago is bankrupt and want the good ole USA hook up like Obama got from tony rezko.

Posted by: Shirley | September 9, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Why is that Republicans think he was talking about Palin? Do they think she is pig? It is a fairly common expression like “dressed up dead man” and I really can’t figure out why they’re getting all worked up about this. That’s right, that’s all they have.

Posted by: Jack | September 9, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Obama 08′. I’m so sick of this Republican BS.

Posted by: TimeToThink | September 9, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

I just love it when the wheels start to come off a political campaign. The lad thinks he is the VP candidate as he keeps referring to the ticket as Biden/Obama and he is rivited on Palin. Michelle better be worried.

Posted by: joe, farmington,NH | September 9, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

JesseDewey:
“My choice is quite easy when I consider a demonstrable war hero vs. a Chicago Politician.”
And certainly your choice IS yours, but it’s not that easy. If being a POW makes you a Hero, there’s a couple thousand others that should be president. Maybe one of them can even fly a plane, or actually ace their class and not be the bottom 5 out of 800+.
JesseDewey:
“A vote for McCain is a vote for 4 more years of Bush” is historically provable hogwash.
Historically, McCain has been a thorn in Bush’s side. Some republicans have called him disloyal because he has “reached across the aisle” many times. He is no stranger to attempts at political reformation.
In 2000, that would have been true. McCain since has made a complete 180 degree turn in order to satisfy his PERSONAL AMBITION and his feeling that he is ENTITLED to the presidency. His voting record and flip flops show it… more on that later, to be fair…
JesseDewey:
“Obama has only a history of supporting the democratic machine and no acts of political reformation.”
Neither does McCain, he’s long abandoned the reform part and is now leaning on his 2000 credentials, which back then were good. Now, not so much.
I WILL say that Obama has flip flopped just as much. Both of them have and neither of them are all that admirable. It is unfortunate because they force you to judge them on something else but their track record.
All hate and partisanship aside, this is another sad election year. The mud, the real ugly mud, is now flung from both sides and here we go down the shitter, divided as always.
I bet both of the candidates love it. Lipstick on a pig, and we’re the real pigs.

Posted by: Hans Meiser | September 9, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

JohnTX may be the smartest person in this forum. Both sides should focus on the issues instead of all this totally irrelevant B.S. What are either of these canidates going to do for me or my family? That is what I want to know, but neither are telling me. I think they both suck!

Posted by: Tired of it | September 9, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Can we vote tomorrow, please :o)

Posted by: Christie | September 9, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

In light of new Obama line that JC, Ben Franklin, Samuel Adams, et.al. were all community organizers, one must first commend him on his modesty, I guess constant comparisions of himself to Abe Lincoln just weren’t enough. Then, one must say he has opened the door to the greatest parlor game since “Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon.” Let’s call it “BLANK is (was) a Community Organizer.”
By the Obama standards, just about anyone can be–even you, even me.
Al Capone was a community organizer. (Albeit a criminal community.)
George Clooney is a community organizer.
(Albeit the smug, I am smarter to everyone else even though I can’t support a hit movie opening on my own community.)
Madonna is a community organizer. (Albeit, I’m just not going there.)
Donald Trump is a community organizer.
(Albeit that perfectly good communities get demolished so his can be built.)
Karl Rove is a community organizer. (Albeit of Christians and Conservatives and all of us elite, intellegent folks know they don’t count.)
Tony Rezko is a community orgainzer. (Albeit his help is limited to aspiring Presidents who need more yard space.)
Bill Ayres is a community organizer.
(Albeit whether the folks he is organizing might get bombed if they don’t cooperate, or if they ask where the $100 Million from the Anneberg Foundation went.)
Now it’s your turn.
Have fun.

Posted by: Midwestern American | September 9, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Obama Biden = Carter 2nd term
Ok I’m back…. you guys I just had this awful dream it goes like this….American votes for this moron and old stiff and they run the country into the ground with terrible tax policy and patsy soft defense.
Question was my dream about Carter or Obama?

Posted by: Time warp | September 9, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Oh please!!!! Give me a break! Why is the media playing into McCain and the Repubs sexism card? Why when these right-wing misfits cry their crocodile tears calling sexism the media just eats it up – have some dignity media. First of all you emphasize the lipstick/pig part but what about the rest of Sen. Obama statement when he also referred to an old saying abut fish/newspaper… why aren’t you blowing up that sentence too? Why aren’t you further mentioning McCain using that phrase when describing Hillary’s health care plan? This is really silly season in politics and the media is in full bloom for a story. Good grief tell us about issues!!!

Posted by: Rant3000 | September 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Q: Is Obama REALLY that stupid???
A: Yes

Posted by: Norino's | September 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Uh…ya like having Joe Biden, a veteran politico in Washington since ’72, is real change. And to think Biden is the brains of the operation…..

Posted by: Tim | September 9, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

I can’t beliee he said that! I actually thought much better of him than that. The last time we heard a reference to lipstick it was from a memorable line from Palin’s speech. Obviously he’s using this expression diffferently but it’s also obvious what his implication is….not very subtle. I had more respect for him as a politician and speaker than that. I’m still undecided, but that really was inappropriate. I’m disappointed in him. It shows his lack of experience that he’s losing his composure now that the pressure is on. Something to think about.

Posted by: NG | September 9, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Spin it as much as you like.
It is blatantly obvious that Obama called Gov Palin a pig, as his audience well-understood.
The following reference to rotten or stinking fish was an obvious reference to the Gov’s husband – a commercial fisherman.
Did Obama write this hateful vitriol all by himself? I’ll bet $100 that Rev Wright and Michelle had “insightful” contributions.

Posted by: crow | September 9, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

“The crowd rose and applauded, some of them no doubt thinking he may have been alluding to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s ad lib during her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech last week”
No doubt everyone does, since that’s the last time lipstick was mentioned in this campaign and she became instantly famous for it. She also worked in commercial fishing, so that comment about fish stinking was choice, too. Good one, Sen. Obama.

Posted by: AmericanWoman | September 9, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

I had a friend who worked on a Republican campain a few years ago. They told me that even though the tax cuts generally only affect the top 3% or so of the population, that middle class Americans think it supports them, and that is gravy.
Wake up, if you earn less than MILLIONS, you are a joke to them. You don’t receive the benefits of these tax breaks. The only thing I can figure is that A. you are as my friend indicated, ignorant of the truth B. Pretending to be wealthy or C. Using this as another piece of propaganda to promote your political leanings.
Let’s make this about the issues and not comments taken out of context.

Posted by: Jane | September 9, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

To all of these democratic posters lashing out a Palin: I love the smell of desperation, smells like Republican victory!

Posted by: Brian | September 9, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

The expression fits the conversation,whats worse an expression that people are going to take ut of context or a perverse ad saying that Obama wants to teach kindergarteners about sex (which McCain is showing right now)? That was low. Obama supported “age appropriate” sex-education for children as a means of teaching them what was proper or inproper touching, as well as to protect them against pedophiles, his campaign has said. McCain is perverse.

Posted by: veronica411 | September 9, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

This is a minor flub. Obama used a common expression that he shouldn’t have used in this context and people are acting like this is the worst thing in the world. He obviously wasn’t calling Palin a pig. It’s not as if McCain has never have said anything he regretted later.

Posted by: jbg | September 9, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Obama’s epic blunder. Write it down.

Posted by: Happy Meal | September 9, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

I actually am going to give Mr. Obama a pass on this one. “Lipstick on a pig…” is a old-fashioned expression which in another context would have been appropriate and is not sexist in its own right. Since its OK for Jimmy Carter to call him a “boy” I suspect that no longer has a racist connotation either.
It is more disturbing to me that the “good” governor of NY feels it necessary to now define a “community organizer” as a racial slur when applied to Mr. Obama’s previously stated occupation. I actually didn’t know that this field of endeavor had any racial aspect.
Of course in a “PC” world you have to be a bit more sensitive in your statements. My own feeling is that Mr. Obama apparently isn’t or didn’t see the connection.
From now on “lipstick” “boy” + “community organizer” are potential slurs. I guess it just depends who says them.

Posted by: avande7217 | September 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

I actually am going to give Mr. Obama a pass on this one. “Lipstick on a pig…” is a old-fashioned expression which in another context would have been appropriate and is not sexist in its own right. Since its OK for Jimmy Carter to call him a “boy” I suspect that no longer has a racist connotation either.
It is more disturbing to me that the “good” governor of NY feels it necessary to now define a “community organizer” as a racial slur when applied to Mr. Obama’s previously stated occupation. I actually didn’t know that this field of endeavor had any racial aspect.
Of course in a “PC” world you have to be a bit more sensitive in your statements. My own feeling is that Mr. Obama apparently isn’t or didn’t see the connection.
From now on “lipstick” “boy” + “community organizer” are potential slurs. I guess it just depends who says them.

Posted by: avande7217 | September 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Every democrat running for prez for the last 40 years has campaigned on more spending, more entitlements, more freebies for deadbeats and of course higher taxes. Obama has exactly the same platform and calls it change.
Meanwhile McCain has never accepted an earmark. That actually is a change.
O’s latest remarks show the wheels are truly coming off.

Posted by: Scott | September 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Obama is ahead in the polls.
LA LA LA LA LA. We won.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Thomas Cline: “I, for one, do not believe that it is in his nature to make such a comment.”
The problem is, he said it. So either his advisers are telling him to use subliminal cues in his language, or he’s got a terrible tin ear (and poor judgment). Because ultimately it doesn’t matter what he MEANT: a goodly number of American women voters are going to HEAR it as calling Sarah Palin a pig, and they’re going to get mad. Can Obama really be so stupid that he throws away a few percentage points of the electorate so casually?

Posted by: Stuart Creque | September 9, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Nice to see everyone here having filthy deranged nervous breakdowns. The next two months are going to be hell.

Posted by: WheelOfSmut | September 9, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Wow….
Talk about a way to insult alot of people on boths sides.. what the hell was he thinking OMG

Posted by: SeanBean | September 9, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Dont lose all hope libs you can still move to Europem Obama is very popular there!
At least untill he moves there and runs for something.

Posted by: Sally | September 9, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Only closed-minded people would take a an expression that fits and turn it into hate.
A lot of people on here seem to have made up their minds the day they saw who Barack Obama was, why do you waste your time spreading your hate here? You wouldnt have a kind word if the man saved your mothers life. He is an educated man that wants to make a difference like John McCain. He has come far in his life and worked hard. But I dont expect small minds to give anyone who deserves some respect any. Its a sad commentary on our world today.

Posted by: veronica411 | September 9, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Barack Obama for President!!
of Europe

Posted by: Sam39 | September 9, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

Obama is not been served well. Anyone sensing conspiracy within his own party that Clinton’s peoples were doing bad advices? Do you really think Clinton’s people will help Obama whole-heartedly?

Posted by: dAn | September 9, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

TC:
No, the best and the brightest that the Democratic Party had to offer was shown the door following the primaries by the powers that be of the DNC, and told to not let it hit her on the way out.
And I sincerely hope she is having a good chuckle over this one………..

Posted by: Lee | September 9, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

I am an Obama supporter no longer.
I cannot support this obvious disrespect towards women. I have to admit, I was finding it difficult to stay with Obama when he snubbed Hilary (after all, she got as many votes as he did).
This latest is way over the top. Looking back at the primaries, now I see how he grossly disrespected and trashed Hilary. I was blind to it before.
Now, I have to agree with Obama’s critics–Obama is acting like a muslim terrorist. He despises women and conducts terrorists attacks against women.
Palin is not running for President, but is more qualified than Obama–why does he attack her? Because she is a woman and he is a muslim!
I would love to see Obama and Palin in a debate–she would clean up the floor with him!
I CANNOT VOTE FOR THE MUSLIM WOMAN HATER!

Posted by: Mary | September 9, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

JOHN MCCAIN CRASHED FIVE PLANES IN THE MILITARY, GO SHOT DOWN BY SOME HAYSEEDS, RATTED OUT ALL HIS FELLOW SOLDIERS, AND NOW HE’S A WAR HERO.

Posted by: Jeff | September 9, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

I wasn’t sure if Obama was in Rev. Wrights church again with that cheering audience.
Obama is such a “smooth” talker, he can say ANYTHING! He went 20 years to that “church” and had no idea they hated whites and hispanics.

Posted by: Mark from Portland | September 9, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Some people think only White People are racists. Being an Asian, here is my take on this issue. Not all White people are bad and not all Black People are good. You can take it as far as you want, it is the plain TRUTH. GO McCain-Pallin 08- Asian Man

Posted by: Asian Man | September 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

We know that because Obama is half black he will be given another opportunity to apologize to Sarah but don’t acknowledge his apologies Sarah and just keep moving forward. He is a sad excuse for a politician who hates his country and the white side of his family that gave him the opportunity to become successful. You are the greatest thing to happen to the Republican Party since Ronald Reagan and I can’t wait to see you in NYC. Thank God for Sarah Palin!
t

Posted by: Ray | September 9, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Veronica411 you are the one with a closed mind. You refuse to allow reality intrude on your set in stone vision of what you want Obama to be.
If you look at these two statements taken together, “old fish” and “pig” with an open mind you will clearly see that the metaphors were for the GoP ticket–personal attacks on both McCain and Palin.
By themselves you could call it a dumb accident, but not when he used both together. Stop suspending your disbelief, Obama is not worth it.

Posted by: Sam39 | September 9, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Let’s keep the adults in the white house.
Mac/PALIN ’08

Posted by: Norino's | September 9, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Todd Palin should demand a public, face to face apology from Barrack Obama.
If someone called my wife a pig, I absolutely guarantee you, he’d miss his next campaign appearance. Mabye two.
And yes, Obama called Sarah Palin a pig. It was not an innocent joke. It was not an unconnected comment. Just listen to the audience react. They all knew exactly what he was saying, because it’s obvious what he meant.
Barrack Obama has no class. He belongs on the Jerry Springer show, not in politics.

Posted by: Erich Walker | September 9, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

You Repubs are makin’ stuff up. Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” was referring to McCain, not Palin. Obama is saying that McCain’s “change” is fake and insincere. Read the title of this blog, Jake Tapper got it right. Obama got it right too — McCain’s been with Bush 90% of the time and then — poof — at the convention McCain suddenly flip-flops and starts talking ‘change.’ Lipstick on a pig, indeed.

Posted by: James | September 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

The lower the poll numbers for OHbama
drop, the higher the pitch of the
squeals from the Left. Soon, they
will be in dog-whistle range and we
will have peace abd quiet.

Posted by: grizzly bare | September 9, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Hillary silent on Palin….. she knows the paRTY IS OVER… UNTIL 2012

Posted by: SeanBean | September 9, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Obama doesn’t do much without political coaching. Some high level advisor had him slip this remark in his daily “talking points.” Not smart.

Posted by: Chad | September 9, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

The only “change” Obama will bring to Washington DC is a healthy dose of South Chicago Style of thug politics.
PS.. That is NOT the kind of “change” that our “good old boy” network in DC needs right now.

Posted by: neville | September 9, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Joerg, excellent post: “What is it about Southwest Virginia….” See the rest below. :)

Posted by: Greg | September 9, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Sexist? Obama was talking about McCain. But let’s say he was talking about Palin, whats worse someone that calls an opponent a pig in reference to an expression, or someone that calls his own wife nasty words.

Posted by: Veronica411 | September 9, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

John D writes, “Not when i’d then be in the same party as these low IQ idiots.”
===================================
You do realize the entire world had that epiphany a long time ago. (lol)

Posted by: Dems | September 9, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

All this crap about Palin this and Palin that is a case and point that the Reds don’t have a clue about the real problems. They are in denial about where we and our kids are going with all this. You need to get over your wonder woman complex and think about whether or not you are going to have a job in the future.

Posted by: Thinker | September 9, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Oops, me thinks Obama camp is hitting desperation mode, eh?
But wait, there is more. The Republicans are hiding the big guns until mid-October. Remember Wright, Ayres, and company? You’ll hear more of them as it gets closer to November.
I bet that will be when the Obama camp will be crying “mommy.” For now, the Repubs are letting them think they’re just behind 5 points or less or even.

Posted by: demo_job | September 9, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

You people need to face the facts.
I happen to think BarryO knew exactly what he was saying and said exactly what he meant to say.
Now, you may choose to believe otherwise, it’s your right. However, you cannot deny, whether he meant it toward Sarah Palin or not, it was an incredibly stupid thing to say and reflects extremely poorly on his character, intelligence, campaign, and temperament.
He is not presidential material.

Posted by: Briles52 | September 9, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

I dont blame Obama for being sore at Palin…..
She did to him in one convention speech, what Hillary and Jesse Jackson had in mind, but couldn’t pull off in 19 months of primary campaigning…

Posted by: neville | September 9, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

It must be dispiriting for the democrats to see another election slipping away. Most Americans reject the extreme liberal values of Pelosi, Obama, Kerry, and Gore and the last two elections confirm it. After 8 years of Slick Willy patting himself on the back and liberal values shoved down our throats, Gore never had a chance. Kerry cooked his goose when he came back from Vietnam. Nobody in their right mind would make him commander in chief. How can you possibly win with spokespersons from MTV, NBC, and Hollywood. Even worse, how can you “not” win with the press in your back pocket. You have denegrated your country and besmeared President Bush but Americans picked him over democrats? Who is smarter, I ask? Americans are not obtuse. They prefer honesty, integrity, and moral character over slick, intelligent, and liberal. Sara Palin is a fresh face that will make a difference in our lives the same way she did for Alaskans. She seems sincere, hard working, and honest. Instead of debating the issues, democrats attacked her with messages that conflict with their own values. This appears to be a major strategic mistake. Once again, the democrats failed to frame the argument in a way Americans will accept. McCain hijacked the “CHANGE” message very cleverly by making the “REFORM” message clear and concise and by picking the right running mate that authenticated his message. Change and Biden don’t belong in the same sentence–he is part of the old guard. Can the Democrats win this election? Chances are less than 30% but not out of reach. They need very smart strategy from here on out; must keep the far left in line and quiet; or a blunder on the McCain side that Americans don’t comprehend as the press smearing conservatives again.

Posted by: Independent | September 9, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Ohbama is truly a political wonder.
How can a candidate speak so clearly
with his foot in his mouth. Did
he learn ventriloquism @ Harvard Law?

Posted by: grizzly bare | September 9, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Sheeple…You will saddenly awake one morning and find your Country is gone.
It will have been “progressively” brought down by narcissistic , “forward thinking”, college educated, “entitled”, morons!
Obama has a plan that should scare the hell out of anyone who truly has read his positions. Expect what you own to become controlled by an even bigger Government…Remember…the overnment that giveth can taketh away!

Posted by: scott | September 9, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

James-
A Harvard educated lawyer should have a lexicon large enough to avoid the word “lipstick” when attacking McCain or Palin.
He should just take the hit and move on. But I’m finding he lacks the humility to do that. Not sure I can trust someone who can’t admit they are wrong. Maybe the wrong guy to have his finger on the “button”.
Obama just lost my vote. If he’s not smart enough to figure that one out…he needs to go back to law school. Sounds like poor judgement.

Posted by: A kiss is just a kiss | September 9, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

manBear – I hope that God blesses your family.

Posted by: Scott | September 9, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Now listen, the republican’s had a setting president and republican majority in congress and the house of representatives for 6 years of Prez Bush term in office and see where we are as a country. If we think that someone who has to fight against his own corrupt party is better suited to replace him then we are a nation of fools and we deserve 4 more years of lies, troops dying, recession, food prices going up, middle class drying up, fuel cost going through the roof next summer, more republican lies, terror talk, and not lest of all the continued transfer of wealth to other countries while making America a third world country. Do you know about the North American Union and the Amero?. Do you know that if China requests from us the debt who owe the dollar would crash. The Great Man Who Has More Wisdom Then Any One In The World – ONCE SAID – “STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES”. Even the bible says, “And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.” Mark 3:25. Now ask yourself which party sold America.

Posted by: charles | September 9, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Y’all sure do get carried away with yourselves over such petty issues. And in all the hub-bub, you miss the point. And it’s a shame. Mostly for the next generation.
The reason that Obama is is heralded as a leader is because he will fight to make something new happen that works FOR ALL including YOU.
Is it bad that your taxes would decrease? Is it bad that a manufactured war would end? is it bad that soldiers would come home? Roads and bridges would get repaired. Schools would get better teachers. Energy would come from here, not over there. And it won’t be oil!
I saw one other thing. Somebody called him a terrorist. If y’all fell for that, you should feel bad for yourselves. You were fooled. Its like saying Mr. McCain spent years in a cell and that he’s really the Manchurian Candidate. Get real, people.
Get real about what matters. Does anyone really think that the past 8 years have been good? Does anyone think that Mr. McCain will do anything differently than the current administration? Does anyone think that more power to corporations combined with less oversight is going to make more jobs? Does anyone think that their current job is safe? It isn’t.
Sorry gang but that’s the hand your president dealt you. And you know it because the word Republican was nowhere to be found at your convention.
Then you announced you were the New Republicans, the Republicans of the Future. Re-branding 101. We’re NEW and IMPROVED!
I was hoping for more. I thought y’all would at least make the decision difficult. Mr. McCain shows up and suddenly he’s about change. What kind? More oil? More war? More spying? More for the rich–something that, odds are, you’re not–or Corporate America? Gosh, that sounds good for everyone.
You can fight to elect an old guy fighting for an old energy resource and an old industry and fill up your gas tank for 4 bucks today. OR you can think about those who will follow you, your children. Your neighbor’s children. The kids in the school down the road.
By the way, the ones that are old enough aren’t thinking about us. The next generation cares about their future, not ours. We done screwed things up enough. Y’all might want to think about them. Be selfless. It’s in the Bible.
Before you pull the trigger on your candidate, decide if you your kids to have clean air or smog. Work or none. War or Peace, and on and on.
The bible taught me to do unto others as I would have them do unto me. On one side, I see a bunch of rich guys doing for themselves. On the other, I see somebody who did for others. Oh, and was ridiculed for it. I found that line from Palin an insult to the good people that work in my church.
A few years back, I considered McCain before Bush shivved him. He’s an alright guy and I’m an Independent. But he is the past. And Palin is a puppet. And she insulted people that fight for an inch of gain in their community. All to make a small town mayor feel and look like a big political player. I hope she is proud to have prostituted herself for her party.
Me? I’m going where young people go. They’re much smarter these days than we all were. I’m going with the people that feel like the future. I’m going with Mr. Obama.

Posted by: StLouIndy | September 9, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

“Veronica411 you are the one with a closed mind. You refuse to allow reality intrude on your set in stone vision of what you want Obama to be.”
Mr. Bean-,What did I say about Obama that was not the truth? Just because you want to ignore that the man has done anything good doesnt make it the truth.
Because I stick up for him my beliefs are set in stone? You know nothing of my beliefs.
What I was referring to is the hatred that is spewed on these boards, and how those spreading it dont see past their own hate. They cant give the man ANY credit just hate, hate, hate.The proof is all over the boards.

Posted by: veronica411 | September 9, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

We’re sick of you for Obama whining about being called “sexist” when your behavior is despicable. We are not your mothers.. Nobody cares what someone like that thinks and you don’t know who you’re up against, so get a clue. This is no way to run a campaign.
They probably think if they can pull this off, they’ll have a better chance in the job market by getting women with children out of the way. HOW ABOUT FAT CHANCE???

Posted by: AmericanWoman | September 9, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

There is only one pig, and that person is a sexist pig.
There is no doubt he was calling Sarah a pig, because in his next sentence he called McCain an old fish.

Posted by: Pete | September 9, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

This guy is “book-smart”, but definately not a ‘thinker’.
He gives great speeches off of a teleprompter, but that’s it.
I mean… name ONE piece of legislation (or a legal brief while teaching college) that he WROTE that was a change from anything at all. There are none.
The only change we have here is an empty suit, with less experience than Palin, that was taken in by the Chicago/Daley/Marxist machine as one of their own. I mean… come on! He was a “constitutional law professor” and never wrote a single paper about anything? Phuh! And a friend of a terrorist? Basically a Tim McVeigh on the left? (He was friends and worked WITH him for over 10 years).
Other than some inspirational speeches off of teleprompters, who is this guy?
He defends hsi days as a ‘community organizer’, but never mentions what he did. Why? Cause he worked with ACORN, who has been cited with voter fraud and racketeering.
What has he done? Ever? I mean it! I AM ASKING?!?!?
Other than he’s not Bush!
Anybody….
Anybody….
Anybody….
Will the last one out, please turn off the lights?

Posted by: ster | September 9, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

This is the kind of thing Obama learned at church!

Posted by: Bob | September 9, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Be man enough to show respect when it is earned.
______________________________________
You have to keep earning respect. It doesn’t rest on something that happened to you 40 years ago that you trot out and cheapen so you can become President. Real heroes never talk about their experiences for opportunistic gain or to distract from their flaws.
Yet, McCain has no problem out his POW experience out again and again and again….there are plenty of Vietnam Vets and ex-POW who don’t get to hide behind their sacrifices everytime something gets difficult in their own lives. But John McCain didn’t really love his country until he was POW did he? Why not??

Posted by: PMM | September 9, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Late Breaking News!! Palin chickens out and will do only one debate with Biden on October 2, 2008 at Wash. U in St. Louis. Palin, afraid to face Biden, is cornered into one debte BUT REFUSES TO DEBATE MORE!!! And she dodged Charlie Gibson as moderator,too.

Posted by: Bill Adkins | September 9, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

Obama wasn’t referring to Sarah Palin, and Bill Clinton didn’t inhale!

Posted by: Bob | September 9, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

I can’t believe we can’t have an intelligent conversation on this board. all we can do is attack each other. Is this what is has come to? Lets get some real substance here. I would like set somethings straight. It is good to be progressive! It is all so good to be traditionalist. The thing we need to do is quit interpreting the constitution of the United States to fit our left or right agenda. We cannot let courts legislate from the bench that is why we have congress. We have to stop letting the government control our lives. We don’t need a bureaucracy control health care but we can’t continue down the path of Insurance companies controlling life and death decisions. We need to pay down our countries debt so middle eastern countries or any other country (that don’t like us very much) don’t control our destiny through taking our land and over taking our financial institutions. We need energy independence, not pie in the sky ideas that “may” occur in ten years and in the mean time we are at the mercy of other countries supplying us energy. Finally, like John F Kennedy said “ask not what your Government can do for you, but what you can do for your country”. I remember listening to John F Kennedy and his speeches, he was a real Democrat who wanted to give back to the people their money by reducing taxes and getting the Government off the backs of the people not grow it larger. He is what we know today as a moderate. listen to his speeches on the web. Research history, because neither candidate has a strong position towards the relieving government burden. These candidates need to quit with the name calling and get to specific on the issues. Neither one gives any specifics on any of these issues. So I calling on everyone to stop the stupidity and let get down to specifics and hold who ever gets elected accountable even if it means a recall.

Posted by: Raphael | September 9, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

REAL MEN DON’T CALL WOMEN PIGS!
Funny thing is — The ONE will soon be squeelin like a pig when he looses all 50 states, (not 57 states, by the way)
McCain/Palin? –I’m In!!!

Posted by: Sheri | September 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

StLouIndy– Best. Post. Ever.
Thanks for that. Words to the wise.

Posted by: Katie O | September 9, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

Oh by the way I’m an Independent, I hunt, so that means I have guns, and I’m the swing vote this year yea a Catholic.

Posted by: Raphael | September 9, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Let’s clarify…I am the Scott who posted Sheeple. I hope I can change my screen name…Nuf said on that.
Its typical Lib playbook to call names when they are backed into a corner. Palin spoke about herself and the annointed one clearly took a cheap shot…put his mouth in motion before listening to what his brain was saying.
Obama can NOT speak without the teleprompter, without polished talking points or on the fly. He has no experience to lead anyone. He has too many unsavory connections in his business, personal and “faith based” dealings. He is not qualified to become Vice President let alone the leader of the free world. Palin is qualified for VP. At least she can make a decision…rather than remain silent or absent and “hope” no one notices the “change”.

Posted by: Scott T | September 9, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Enough is enough. The McCain campaign’s attack tonight is a pathetic attempt to play the gender card about the use of a common analogy – the same analogy that Senator McCain himself used about Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s health care plan just last year. This phony lecture on gender sensitivity is the height of cynicism and lays bare the increasingly dishonorable campaign John McCain has chosen to run.

Posted by: Enough | September 9, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Getting Desperate!! Can’t hold up this empy suit much longer…Help!
Obama

Posted by: lisab | September 9, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

right-side celebration — 2 down(ko/cm)and 5 to go! will anyone from cnn/msnbc ask joe biden about his plajarism episodes? how about a special on devoted husband jon edwards?

Posted by: datrufhurts | September 9, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

Axis, you are absolutely correct. Here’s what happened in my family: My wife and I were driving down the road and a talk show was on. The two moderators were talking and mentioned that “Obama has criticised McCain and said it’s like ‘putting lipstick on a pig’”. I’ll tell you what, my wife went bezerk! She IMMEDIATELY knew that Obama was referring to Palin, and that this was a slap at all women.
I’m telling you, this is a repeating pattern… This is not the first time Obama has savaged women. Check out how he went unapposed in Chicago politics against a Democrat FEMALE challenger. Check out what he did to HRC. Now Palin.
This is a repeating pattern ladies. You fell for it with Bill Clinton, having to defend his MULTIPLE cheating on his wife. Are you going to do the same again? Like cheated lovers, are you going to continue to defend these men who continue to use and then discard you? Really, how long are you liberal ladies going to continue to take this type of treatment? It’s really dysfunctional, your relationship to your male Democrat leaders!

Posted by: Greg | September 9, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

PPM wrote,
You have to keep earning respect. It doesn’t rest on something that happened to you 40 years ago that you trot out and cheapen so you can become President.
I guess you just explained why John Kerry lost.
Hey…lets get rid of memorial day and martin luther king day. The sacrifice of fellow americans doesn’t need to be “trotted” out as an example of honorable behavior.

Posted by: PPM is wrong | September 9, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Now listen, the republican’s had a setting president and republican majority in congress and the house of representatives for 6 years of Prez Bush term in office and see where we are as a country. If we think that someone who has to fight against his own corrupt party is better suited to replace him then we are a nation of fools and we deserve 4 more years of lies, troops dying, recession, food prices going up, middle class drying up, fuel cost going through the roof next summer, more republican lies, terror talk, and not lest of all the continued transfer of wealth to other countries while making America a third world country. Do you know about the North American Union and the Amero?. Do you know that if China requests from us the debt we owe the dollar would crash. The Great Man Who Has More Wisdom Then Any One In The World – ONCE SAID – “STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES”. Even the bible says “And if a house be divided against itself, that house cannot stand.” Mark 3:25. Now ask yourself which party sold America.

Posted by: charles | September 9, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

What a cheap shot! He called palin a pig and mccain and old dead fish. Who the heck does this guy think he is?

Posted by: chris | September 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Jake,
Very well said!!! I am still smiling!!
I was getting so very tired of hearing Sarah Palin. No issues really discussed in news. Republicans wat all attention on Palin. Look back at 2004. Familiar??
You saved my day!! History of pig and lipstick quite interesting.

Posted by: Sharonklim | September 9, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Reading comments applauding Obama for what everyone would agree is a classless reference to Palin only exposes some on this board. If you don’t understand that Obama crossed the line than you are a zealot blinded by your ideology. Is this the type of rhetoric you want coming from the candidate of change who pledged he would run a different kind of campaign. Just remember how this comment will play among the coveted independent voters who are currently pushing McCain ahead in the polls. Not very smart. But I’m having a great time watching the implosion.

Posted by: Dave | September 9, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

I read Obama has voted with the Dem leadership 97% of the time. Change you can believe in? Not so much.

Posted by: GregInSeattle | September 9, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

McCain is a runt.
Moose-mom likewise.
We don’t want pocket-size
people running the show.

Posted by: anon | September 9, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

If McCain/Palin is “pocket size”, Obama/Biden is almost microscopic size.

Posted by: GregInSeattle | September 9, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

THIS REPORTER HAS A DIFFERENT TAKE ON OBAMA’S USE OF THE COMMOM PHRASE:
Feeling a Challenge, Obama Sharpens His Silver Tongue
By JEFF ZELENY
Published: September 9, 2008
NY Times
In the latest sign of the campaign’s heightened intensity, Mr. McCain’s surrogates responded within minutes and called on Mr. Obama to apologize to Gov. Sarah Palin for the lipstick remark. But to those in the audience, it was clear that Mr. Obama was employing an age-old phrase — lipstick on a pig — and referring to Mr. McCain’s policies. He had not yet mentioned Ms. Palin at that point of his speech.

Posted by: Steve J. | September 9, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

JAY AT 9:42, TELL ME WHERE YOU HEARD MEGHAN McCAIN SAY ANYTHING BAD ABOUT HER DAD TODAY….IT COULDN’T HAVE BEEN THE VIEW, BECAUSE I SAW A PROUD DAUGHTER ON THAT SHOW.

Posted by: Debra | September 9, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

People were laughing
and booing whenever BO
mentioned her name.
They know she’s a
dime a dozen third-rate
politician. They are not
impressed by the Republican
hoopla surrounding her.

Posted by: anon | September 9, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

The definition of a pig pertaining to a person is a greedy or filthy person.
So when Obama referred to Palins comment about hocky moms he was saying that hocky moms were greedy or filthy people.That was the lowest thing anyone could say to anyone.

Posted by: Dee | September 10, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

All you whiney Republicans sound like bitter clingers. No wonder the messiah is afraid to debate McCain in weekly townhall meetings. Imagine the HOURS of you-tube footage where the chosen one has a foot in his mouth!

Posted by: My 2 cents | September 10, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

This is a new low.. Old fish, come on? Obviously a reference to Palin stinky over-used baby shoot… Tsk Tsk

Posted by: Yikes | September 10, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Barack Obama and Joe Biden both suffer from a severe form of foot-in-mouth disease. Calling a lady a pig is very low class and very stupid – Obama is not ready for prime time.

Posted by: Norman | September 10, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Phil Gramm as partially correct: Republicans are a nation of whiners.
:-)

Posted by: Steve J. | September 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Sounds like Obama would be at home touring with Russell Brand the famed Mtv VMA host, they both do not seem to understand what is offensive to Americans. That was a joke he should have told in Germany or maybe the U.K. I guess Mr. Clean Campaign is a thing of the past. I hate seeing a grown man resort to calling an opposing V.P. candidate and her following of “hockey moms” PIGS!!! I am now disgusted – I thought he would be a little more cool under pressure, but as it turns out he goes off the deep end the 1st time he is behind in the polls… PIGS? PIGS? Way to embarrass the democrat party yet again, name calling is for children – maybe you are not ready for the Presidency. This marks the moment that you have become a has-been! Maybe Brand will allow you to lay low at his “flat” for a while???

Posted by: GunnyA | September 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

some people want to come to his defense and yet he is supposed to have been trained a s a lawyer who knows the weight and meaning and effect that words have. So, sorry WYSIWYG. He said it,he meant it.

Posted by: Bobbi | September 10, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Interesting to see that Obama is using the same tactics Republicans constantly use. I am totally fine with that.
They play dirty lies after lies after lies Obama had no other choice but to hit them hard.
Palins remind me of the french socialist leader in the last election in France, Segolene Royale. Incompetent, empty and relying mostly on her sex.
I can not imagin Palins arguing with Russia on any issue while McCains’ is in bed for surgery number 345343443. I am sure Poutine will be kind enough to offer tea and biscuit.
Well done Obama.

Posted by: Canadian dude | September 10, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Wow! That’s downright evil!

Posted by: jesse | September 10, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Isn’t the choice easy? You want a Prom Queen and a guy who blew up the USS Forrestal or two constitutional scholars in the White House?
http://slowdecline.wordpress.com/2008/07/05/57/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here are some facts from the sailors and crewman from that fateful day:
Surviving crewmen and those who investigated the Forrestal fire case reported that McCain deliberately ‘wet-started’ his A-4E Skyhawk to shake up the guy in the F-4 Phantom behind his A-4.
‘Wet-starts’, done either deliberately (the starter motor switch allowed kerosene to pool in the engine and give a wet start) or accidentally, shoot a large flame from the tail of the aircraft. In McCain’s case, the ‘wet-start’ ‘cooked off’ and launched the M34 Zuni rocket from the rear F-4 that punctured the Skyhawk’s fuel tank, knocked the M-65 1000 lb. bomb off it’s 500 lb. rated mount, and touched off the explosions and massive fire.
The F-4 pilot was reportedly killed in the conflagration, along with 167 of his fellow Forrestal shipmates (including those who died later from wounds suffered).
‘Wet starting’ was a common practice among young ‘hot-dog’ pilots. McCain was quickly (they were still counting the Forrestal dead) transferred to the USS Oriskany (the only Forrestal crewman to be immediately transferred).

Posted by: Lee in Keith Ellison's 5th Distict Mpls. | September 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

RE: Bill Adkins
When is the last time Hillary wore lipstick? Thought she gave that up when she started with the pant suits… It is a completely differnt context and it was meant to insult and YOU know it. I can’t wait to cast my ballot, this party has become a party of self serving, what can my country do for me, cry baby nuts… Also everyone is worried about Palins alledegd affair – how soon you forget about the Bill Clinton chronicles… Just like you whackos.

Posted by: Former Democrat & glad | September 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

I’m on the moderate right, and the racist jabs in this forum make me sick. I don’t think they represent the right at all.
Obama is a hard-core leftist who I think is getting his hat handed to him by a very smart, very savy, very EXPERIENCED McCain campaign.
He’s spent too much time climbing the political ladder to offer any substance. He’s power hungry and arrogant. He seems to think Americans are ignorant dolts that’ll buy anyting in flashy packaging.
I was on the fence until Palin came into the race. Obama, politics 101, focus on McCain. But he Can’t! Bidon is renowned for his gaffs and Obama all but admitted his inexperience by picking him.
The democrats picked the WRONG candidate. I can’t stand Hilary, but if the Dems thought this was a better choice; they’re NUTS! I was interested in him until I got to know him.
I’m so dissapointed in Obama as the first african-american candidate. He’s NOTHING like his marketing image. He stammers, he’s a re-packaged tax-and-spend lib, he’s a bit sexist, and he dodges questions and burns lifelong relationships for political expediency (spelling?).
I’ve decided he’s not much more than a motivational speaker.
I’ve decided Obama’s a total fake. Where’s J.C. Watts of Oklahoma? He’s my hero, and worthy of respect. Obama continues to loose mine; for him and the democratic party.

Posted by: Marbles | September 10, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Now it is clear that obama is nothing but another politician playing the game in the dirty way…He is trying desperatly to pull down Palin… yeah baby..the obama bounce has gone…The communist candidate will lose in november. McCain might not be the best candidate but sure obama will be america’s worst nightmare based on his poor judgment, total inexperience and extreme leftist mindset…

Posted by: Sam | September 10, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

My prom queen can beat up your wussy lib rabble-rousing community organizer. Constitutional scholar? Is that what he was learning while sitting under Jeremiah Wright for twenty years?

Posted by: Bob | September 10, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

I’m going to bed. You libs are no challenge.

Posted by: Bob | September 10, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Obama should have never referred this remark to Sarah Palin. Obama’s not giving us change at all. Can you image when he’s not on mike..

Posted by: Christie | September 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Oh please. Who does she think she is?
Queen of Alaska. Whoops she lost that title didn’t she? He was referring to policy and not her. I demand an apology from her regarding community
organizing. She needs to learn Politics 101 and how this isn’t the PTA. Equal Means Equal not Special.
She referred to herself as a dog in lipstick and she was speaking about herself. Even Huckabee thinks this is too much hands off. John needs to quit using her as a prop and she needs to learn what a VP does. I understand she she just found out a couple of months ago.

Posted by: Amanda | September 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I’ve said it before, and first on these pages, and now we’re hearing about it.
“Nowhere Exposure” is tanking McCain’s numbers bigtime.
And McCain’s calling Clinton a Pig will not help him keep the women he so desperately wanted his running mate to drag over to his ticket.
Loving the view from here.

Posted by: kravitz | September 10, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I hope every one of you remembers this is the garbage criteria you used to elect the president the next time terrorists decide they want to fly planes into our buildings. Where do the candidates stand on national security, and what are they going to do to rebuild our battered military? Isn’t that the discussion we SHOULD be having?

Posted by: Phil | September 10, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

If this Bozo is so lame, he would use the word lipstick with any animal, so close on the heels of last weeks famous quote by Gov. Palin…..he is dumber than I thought.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN BEFORE HE PICKED PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 10, 2008, 12:37 am 12:37 am

Face it, Obama blew it. He’s lost the election.

Posted by: SickOfPoliticians | September 10, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

“..this kind of language is so offensive to women who have favorable view of Palin.”
Grow up. Its an old saying. Kind of like a rose by any other name… Only better. And more appropriate. The comment was not directed at Palin – and anyway she has already called herself a dog with lipstick. So pigs with lipstick are somehow more offensive than dogs with lipstick now? Whocoodanode?

Posted by: milsy | September 10, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

The Republicans are a party
of old near-death people.
Sarah Palin may be a source
of much excitement to them.
To others she is just another
Republican politician.

Posted by: anon | September 10, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

Sharone posted:
“You can put lipstick on a pig” is a very old saying used down here in the South. So for all you idiots crying sexist, please hold on to your draws.
Last time I checked Obama didn’t grow up in the south, so I am sure that would not be in his normal slang. He just thinks he is too smart for people to catch the innuendo.

Posted by: frescooda | September 10, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

When will this election be over with. Too much drama from both McCain and Obama. No I am not going to say Ron Paul or Bob Barr! Just in case there’s some of their supporters here.
I just wish the media would stop playing gotcha games and focus on real issues.
It’s like a popularity contest.

Posted by: BRIAN BEACH | September 10, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am

You can put an empty suit named Obama in front of a teleprompter by you sure cannot call him Presidential.
Maybe he can go take his fake Presidential Seal and his fake Greek temple and move them back to his Rezko mansion in Chicago and play President there.

Posted by: Debbie | September 10, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Boy, even the panel at CNN thought this was a mistake for Obama…Gergen says it was a lost day for him, no one hears his message, only pig/lipstick…
And what’s with Biden and his lipstick comment….geeze THIS FROM THE PARTY OF TOLERENCE? Hillary got a dose of this sexism up close and personal.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN BEFORE HE PICKED PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 10, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

Obama didn’t call her a pig, get over yourselves. Gotta go with StLouindy posted way above. Think about what is important and what this election is really about. It is not about name calling or some ‘fresh face’ from the north. This is about the economy, stupid. It’s about ending a war that is killing thousands of others peoples children. It is about ending off-shoring US jobs. It’s about preserving and strengthening the middle class in America, before the middle class is totally destroyed. It’s about improving health care, repairing infrastructure and improving public education. None of these positive outcomes are going to come from Grandpa Munster and the Valedictorian. McSame is in the pockets of lobbyists and corporations. He has 134 lobbyists working on his campaign. His tax cuts are intended for the top 1% of U.S., not the middle class. He has stated that he expects the war to last another 100 years. He is 72, and in poor health, and wants to leave our country in the hands of a right wing, bigotted, ignorant, beauty queen. If you think this is a good choice, you are either clinically insane, or so wealthy you can build your own roads, and have doctor in residence on your estate, down the hall from your kids private tutors. No? You don’t? Clinically insane then, ok….Good luck with that.

Posted by: sfmurph | September 10, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Why is Obama taking on Gov. Palin…the #2 on the ticket? Lowering himself? Rattled, inexperienced, anymore adjectives we can apply to Obama in handling the phenom Gov. Sarah Palin?
Let this just keep spinning out of control for the BO campaign.

Posted by: Debra | September 10, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

Bill at 11:10….Gov. Palin is not dodging Charile Gibson…..she is being interviewed by him 9/11 and 9/12 for ABC.

Posted by: Debra | September 10, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

The Republicans can fool
themselves about their
moose-mom phenom.
She’s a wet firecracker.
Don’t get too excited.
She is minimally educated.
There is nothing to suggest
she has the right stuff
for the job.
At rallies, she reads whatever
material is given to her by
Republican bosses and then goes
back into hiding.
This is not how a phenom or
wunderkind behaves.
Her biography is threadbare.
She kills moose and spends
a lot of time visting Doomsday
churches.

Posted by: anon | September 10, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

He can’t debate experience, cause he’ll lose. Can’t debate issues, cause he doesn’t know where he stands from one day to the next. CHANGES his mind every day. Just reversed himself on tax increases,there was FISA, drilling, the surge, and opting out of federal campaign funding, to name a few.
So just talk about pigs and lipstick,and smelly fish, sweetie. Ignorant insults are all you have left.

Posted by: Hillarywouldhavewon | September 10, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

McCain is a product well
past its expiration date
and should be discarded
along with other trash.

Posted by: anon | September 10, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Palin is an EARMARK PORKER …
Palin made Alaska #1 per capita the highest state in the union at $1000 per AK resident with pork barrel earmark dollars that she brought back to Alaska.
meanwhile .. Palin …
claims to be an earmark reformer ? LOL!

Posted by: Elugens | September 10, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

StLouIndy: Why shucks old timer, that was about the most heart-warming bunch of squirrel stew I ever did done read about in my whole entire dang lifetime. You sure as shootin’ did shoot from the hip, didn’t ya’; ‘scuse my reference to evil weapons, you know that I’m cool with how you went down.
Now, that you have done splained how that good young man (who all the other young folks are supportin) is going to solve ALL of our problems, plus give us a whole bunch of money back, and stick it to those rich old Republicans who held such a pathetic excuse for a convention (it was nuthing like that bust out grand party the Democrats held in Denver, with all those stars and all).
I don’t believe a bit those pictures of all those mountains of trash that those wonnerful Democrats left behind, they were probably just photoshopped to make the Democrats look bad; we all know that Democrats love the planet and respect the environment and would never in the world leave a mess anywhere). We all know that it is the Republicans who hate the environment and don’t give a rip about planet earth and only build those green houses just to make rich Democrats looks bad. George W. Bush had no right to build an energy efficient house and then compare it to the monstrosity that Al Gore built that uses all that electricity. We know that Al cares and George is just stupid. It was probably just an accident that Bush creates his own power from the Texas sun. Why, if Gore had as much sun in Tennessee, he could do the same. Or if Gore had as much sun in California, he could do it for his home there. It isn’t Gore’s fault that George Bush has more available sun! Besides, those are probably just lied from the Faux TV station.
Now that I know that the man who said “MY MUSLIM FAITH” and who learned there were 57 STATES (Islamic States) but who never learned there were 50 American States, is going to be the next president of the United States, I sure do feel much better. You know, I don’t care that he never set foot on this continent until he was 18 years old and doesn’t know a thing about growing up in America. I don’t care that he doesn’t know what Memorial Day means or what Veterans Day means. Those are just “Republican” Holidays anyway. I don’t care that he doesn’t think that Iran is a threat because it’s just a small country. I don’t care that he doesn’t know which states are touching Illinois (even though he was in the Illinois State House as a senator; after all, he had better things to think about). I don’t care that he got all that free property from Rezko, or that Rezko is a crook. I don’t care if he hangs out with Weathermen anarchist bombers! After all, they haven’t set off bombs for a long time and we all make mistakes. I don’t care that he used drugs and might have a heart attack at any moment due to his drug use. I don’t care that he lied about having an uncle, or saying that he liberated Auschwitz. I don’t care if he lied about Revvem Wright, or if he lied about Pfleger. I don’t care who or what he lied about because I know that he is going to do the right thing, even if it is the very first time in his life.
I don’t care how he is going to pay for making our lives perfect. I don’t care if the Iraq people get slaughtered when our troops are pulled out. I don’t care what anybody thinks about President Obama because the world wants him to be our president, and who are we to argue with the whole world??? I am looking forward to getting everything I want under the Obama administration. BRING IT ON!!!
Never mind the nasty Republicans; they had their time and now its OUR time. Let it rip and tell Obama to rip into Sarah; who does she think she is, insulting our best candidate who only cares about people. And, never mind her years of administrative and executive experience; he cares and that is all that matters. Tomorrow is a new day! Change! Go Barry!

Posted by: stgeorgeschapel | September 10, 2008, 2:23 am 2:23 am

For those of you who are offended by Obama’s comment or out of touch with reality.
“Putting lipstick on a pig” as defined by the Urban Dictionary:
“A term used by many, generally in reference to someone who may be trying to make something or someone look appealing or attractive when it quite clearly will not work, or will only deceive the dumbest of people.
Car salesmen are generally good at “putting lipstick on a pig” because they are always selling unroadworthy buckets of *** and try and hide their ***fulness by tarting them up.”
Gives new meaning to the name BABE.

Posted by: becky | September 10, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am

He’s cynically manipulating all of us. He makes nasty comments like that using code words that seem harmless as old phrases but phrases that have deep meaning. This is like his giving his finger to Hillary. I don’t think he’s coming apart at all and do believe he’s the Saudi candidate for President. His statements are his vicious hatred of women. What strikes me as very odd is how that seems to play very well with the press and the crowds. How can all those young women support him when he shows such disrespect to them and all women. Hooray for McCain’s campaign calling on Obama’s vicious sexism.

Posted by: moi61537 | September 10, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am

Obama is his own worst enemy. When he opens his mouth garbage flies out and the liberal rats run to lick it up, while the majority of normal people in this country are repulsed by it. Keep this clown talking, because with every word he pushes McCain and Palin straight into the Whitehouse in ’08. We are approaching landslide status at the rate Obama is spewing stupidity.

Posted by: ted | September 10, 2008, 4:22 am 4:22 am

McCain and Palin deserve it.

Posted by: lita | September 10, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am

Both McCain and Obama offer little in real change. Just words! The deficit will still be enormous under both. Tax cuts both are claiming. They can’t do it and they know it.

Posted by: steve | September 10, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am

Both McCain and Obama offer little in real change. Just words! The deficit will still be enormous under both. Tax cuts both are claiming. They can’t do it and they know it.

Posted by: steve | September 10, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Steve.
Yes we are in deep deep doo doo.
So you have a range of options.
1. Vote for the guy that is going to have the most power and who you think is most likely to get things started back to sanity.
2. Vote for a 3rd party candidate which
is an honorable but currently ineffective thing to do.
3. Don’t vote and don’t complain when your grandkids have to learn Chinese in order to find a job.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 5:06 am 5:06 am

Ted,
Your astute socio-political observations are helpful to the nation as a whole and will of course aid in maintaining the strength of our American culture.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 5:09 am 5:09 am

moi61537,
The topic here regards the merit and veracity of policy statements.
Indignant pit-bull victimization is a couple of columns up.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 5:12 am 5:12 am

Leave it to ABC “News” to run this story without mentioning that, last November, McCain used the same phrase with respect to Hillary Clinton and her health care proposal.

Posted by: Fightin' Democrat | September 10, 2008, 6:04 am 6:04 am

At a minimum, Obama exhibited extremely poor judgment in using the pig word knowing. He is not as eloquent as the left likes to portray him. He keeps gaffing. I personally think he really was referring to Palin as it was only days ago she used the same word. How low can Obama go?

Posted by: Don | September 10, 2008, 6:37 am 6:37 am

Brian:
Certainly you cannot be serious. Republicans will win on EVERY issue, from national defense to school choice to budgets to the environment to health care. THAT IS WHY THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT THE FOCUS TO BE ON ISSUES. The media is completely in the tank for the Left WHICH IS WHY THEY REFUSE TO FOCUS ON THE ISSUES.
So, if the media REFUSES to focus on issues, or to publish responses to issues, and the Democrats REFUSES to focus on issues, or to respond to issues driven questions, WHAT DO YOU EXPECT THE REPUBLICANS TO DO??
We can hardly run a campaign by talking to ourselves (which is what often times happens anyway) and we can hardly run a campaign when the other side refuses to cooperate and the media refuses to give us fair and balanced coverage.
If Obama refuses to debate John McCain, what can we do? We can’t force him, yet you want to “loftily blame both sides” WHEN ONLY ONE SIDE IS CAUSING THE PROBLEM.

Posted by: stgeorgeschapel | September 10, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am

I don’t understand – either Obama was wrong in using the analogy to describe the Republicans AND so was John McCain when using it to describe Hillary Clinton’s health care plan, or neither were.
Can someone explain to me why it’s okay for McCain but not okay for Obama? Did Hillary Clinton complain about McCain said it? Of course not.
Funny – Palin called her a whiner, yet she’s in the national spotlight for one week and she’s already sqealing like… you know.

Posted by: Jesse | September 10, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

A few more gaffs like this one and Obama’s chance for getting elected will evaporate. I was impressed with his first speech or two but wasn’t so impressed after that. On another note- Palin is my new real hero, and I am so glad to have one! She is a ‘what you see is what you get’ kind of person. She’ll go toe to toe with anyone and is not intimated. Thank you ALASKA for producing such a STAND UP kind of woman. Moose burger is pretty good by the way!

Posted by: BarbaraNC | September 10, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

stgeorgeschapel.
The Ministry of Truth must be throwing another Kool Aid party.

Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 10, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

This pig comment is of no importance other than to demonstrate that the Obama camp and their official supporters (not the blogers) are scared. A Harvard educated lawyer has a bigger lexicon at his disposal than using cheap innuendos.
He should just take the hit and move on.
The real story is: Palin is the example that feminism is over. Palin is progress. Women no longer have to act like angry men to be taken seriously. She is a media star because people are sick and tired of the same “progressive” tactics. She is a threat to so called “progressive thinkers” that believe you have to push your ideas in someone’s face to get what you want. That scares you. It may have worked 40 years ago…but not any more. Gloria Steinem and Hillary’s pantsuits need to take a bow and fade into the history books. If you missed out on the 1960s and 70s…too bad. Get over it and come up with something original.
Bring on the pig comments…

Posted by: No more pantsuits | September 10, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

Obambi is half this and half that and a half wit. Want lipstick with that loss in NOvember Barry?!? B~)) POW/WOW ’08

Posted by: Dana | September 10, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

The Republicans are not only being INCREDIBLY petty in this situation but also completely hypocritical. Below is a link to an article about how JOHN MCCAIN used the same phrase when talking of Hillary Clinton’s Health Care plan.
As a matter of fact, the phrase “You can put lipstick on a pig, but its still a pig” is actually a common turn of phrase used by many many politicians, among other people, before this election.
I think its obvious that the McSAME camp has no other choice but to be so petty because their policies make it impossible to stand on their own.

Posted by: Dawn | September 10, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

What are Republicans whining about today?
1-”Librul” media?
2-Fake sexism charges?
Let me know when they get to whining about the state of the UNION.

Posted by: McCain/Palin/Republicans Call a whaaaambulance | September 10, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am

The real truth is that you Rebulicians are digging for any help that you can get so you jump on petty comments to boost your confidence. Boo HOOO!!!! Stop crying and put Sarah Palin in front of the Press. Now who’s scared???? Who’s really crying Crocidile TEARS!!!!

Posted by: J.B. S.S | September 10, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

If he had picked Hillary he wouldn’t be in this mess, and the name calling is very rude.I say get um MCCain and Sarah

Posted by: KY | September 10, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

I’m confused…Are they upset because they think Obama insulted her makeup, or her deodorant…Or both?

Posted by: Bubba | September 10, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

I WOULD LIKE DISCLOSURE AS TO PALIN WORTH—JUST MIGHT BE A LITTLE OIL BRIBE MONEY INVOLVED—-UNBELIEVABLE THAT THIS IS NOT INVESTIGATED.GET ON THE BALL GANG–LETS GET TO THE TRUTH—-HOW MUCH AND WHERE DID IT COME FROM.

Posted by: rodney | September 10, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

Now that’s a fist Jab…Attaboy

Posted by: Bubba | September 10, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Everyone is missing the point. Obama was saying that Palin is the lipstick and McCain is the pig – Palin is the newspaper and McCain is the fish. So infact he complimented Palin and insulted McCain. It is a very accurate analogy that clearly illustrates the trick republicans are trying to pull on the America people to get their pig elected. That pig being John McCain. But lipstick smears and wears off quickly. It needs to be re-applied, which is why McCain keeps Palin so close on the campaign trail. Without Palin to make McCain look good everyone will see him for what he really is.
Also not enough attention is being paid to the fact that Palin is an unknown quantity who is turning out to be quite deceptive, vindictive and extreme and alot of her attraction to voters come down to her looks, compared to Obama and McCain. So even if the analogy is applied to her it is very accurate and highlights how her looks are being used to manipulate voters. She looks good but she is a pig of a politician. The lip-stick on a pig analogy is also an accurate discription of McCains lies about being an agent of change and a maverick.
All three interpretations of the lipstick/pig analogy clearly describes how the America people are being deceived by the McCain Palin ticket. A vote for Palin and McCain truly is a vote for lipstick on a pig, whichever way you look at it. After two weeks of republican hype and hoopla Obama has very accurately described the republican ticket in a way that everyone can easily understand.

Posted by: Trutheriser | September 10, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

If you watch the video, it’s obvious that Obama was making a joke a Palin’s expense. You can tell by the way he paused after saying, “You can put lipstick on a pig…”. At this point, the audience got it. You know because they laughed. Obama got it was well. You could tell by the expression on his face. It doesn’t help Obama any when you consider that the most repeated line from Palin’s speech was the Pitbull/Lipstick joke. Also, this was not just an insult to Palin, but ALL (insert sport here)-moms.
Now, Libs claim to have an open mind. So, open your mind and honestly ask yourself what you would be saying if McCain had said, “You can put a monkey in a suit…” It’s the exact same line, but with a different innuendo. Would you guys be so quick to dismiss it?

Posted by: ArcherB | September 10, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am

MCcain used the same line during the primaries.
get over it.
same people who were saying all that stuff about the kitchen and heat.
yes, GET OVER IT.
hit em hard, where it hurts.
Obama Biden 2008.

Posted by: voter in pa | September 10, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

John McCain used those exact same words when he was talking about Hillary Clintons’ heath care plan. Did he need to apologize? Was he calling Hillary a Pig? We should be talking about the issues.

Posted by: john | September 10, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

‘amw’ put it better than I could have done, (but not better than Greenwald did ;-)
Since Palin arrived on the scene the tone of the blog debate has descended into screaming. The reason is that Obama supporters realise that his attempt to campaign on the issues will now be entirely drowned out by meaningless debate about soundbites – what is the meaning of the word “experience”? What is the meaning of the word “maverick”? Who is “patriotic”? When is a lie actually a lie?
And now best of all, “at what point is a metaphor a sexist insult?”

Posted by: CasualObserver | September 10, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

All you need to ask your self is, ARE YOU IN BETTER SHAPE NOW THAN IN 2000? The answer if your not from another planet is NO. Can you imagine 4 more years of this?

Posted by: jonny bullet | September 10, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

i dont even know why i read this to be honest.
All news channels and networks are owned by FOUR, FOUR coroporations.
corporations with money and interest in a republican presidency. Controversy sells.
don’t believe anything you hear.
objective? PLEASE!

Posted by: voter in pa | September 10, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Why is John McCain calling Sarah Palin a Pig? I think it is wrong!

Posted by: Scott | September 10, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Obama isn’t so stupid as to not understand why the crowd rose and appaulded when he uttered the “lipstick on a pig” line. If really wasn’t that great, especially if you assume it not to be an insult. If he had been smart, he would have put an end to it right there, but instead he just went on.

Posted by: Neo | September 10, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I am more concerned about the reference to Palin’s five children and how difficult it must be for her to take care of them.
This will be his new line – a “warning” (she can’t both be a good mother and a VP!) wrapped in a compliment, much like his McCain references (“we honor his service but he’s so OLLLDDDDD school).
Obama is slippery.

Posted by: Echo21 | September 10, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

The issue of change. It seems to me that change is good when change is needed. That being said I think that change was needed with Savings and Loan Scandal. You know Silverado Neil Bush, the Keating Five John McCain. Well guess what!The Wall Street Journal reveals that besides being the DIrector of Silver State Bank, Andrew McCain, “was a member of its three-person audit committee, which was responsible for overseeing the company’s financial condition.” So he knew better than anyone what kind of trouble the bank was in. Did he see the writing on the wall, or did he, in fact, help write it?
The same WSJ article fills us in…”If Mr. McCain had remained on Silver State’s board another four days, his position on the audit committee would have required him to sign off on the company’s second-quarter financial statements…Three weeks after Mr. McCain quit, Silver State had to revise those second-quarter numbers to reflect a loss of $72.3 million.” That to me is “lipstick on a pig”

Posted by: tje | September 10, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

The crowd rose and applauded, some of them no doubt thinking he may have been alluding to Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s ad lib during her vice presidential nomination acceptance speech last week, “What’s the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? Lipstick.”

Er… no doubt.

Posted by: Rionn Fears Malechem | September 10, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

FINALLY! tsk, tsk John McCain– Obama’s finally throwing some punches back. The republican Orwellean Newspeak doesn’t work so well when that happens, now does it? (Oh heck, ask your teenager to read it to you if you don’t know how). Palin cannot use the line in her speech (which, by the way, was written by Bush’s speech writers 2 days prior to the Palin announcement. They had to rewrite it to “feminize” it, according to Bush’s, sorry, McCain’s campaign manager) to differentiate herself AS a woman in this race, and then disallow it’s usage. Had Obama NOT thrown that punch–he’d have owed an apology to women who actually use their brains to THINK. I really do wish that all these conservative men would stop deciding what women should or shouldn’t be thinking. I’M A WOMEN WITH A BRAIN, AND I’M NOT AFRAID TO USE IT! Go Obama, go!

Posted by: Sunnydaz | September 10, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

You can put a socialist in a suit…..he’s still a socialist.

Posted by: Voter | September 10, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

I thouth the pig comment was FUNNY, you people need to lighten up. like seriously…
CAN WE PLEASE FOCUS ON THE ISSUES…….
White Women, Calm Down. comparing Obama to OJ is reaching an all time low. really. If this isn’t Racism I don’t know what is.
Clearly, this whole racial undercurrent thats been brewing; thanx to Hillary appealing to the rednecks as a last ditch effor to save her candidacy and McCains new ‘country first’ slogan as a masked attack on Obama’s and democrats patrotism, is boiling over now.
It’s really sad and disconcerting that in 2008 we are still dealing with this level of ignorance. It baffles the mind at how we attack each other over the irrelevant things.
Is this the example we want to set for our children, I hope we all take a step back and remember what is most important.
DO YOU HAVE A JOB?
CAN YOU PAY YOUR BILLS?
DO YOU HAVE ADEQUATE HEALTH COVERAGE?
ARE YOU SAFE AT HOME, DO YOU FEEL SAFE IN THIS COUNTRY?
CAN YOU PAY FOR COLLEGE?
ARE YOUR CHILDREN SUFFICIANTLY EDUCATED?
CAN YOU AFFORD DAYCARE TO LOOK FOR WORK?
CAN YOU AFFORD GAS?
ARE YOU CARING FOR ELDERLY PARENTS AND CHILDREN AT THE SAME TIME?
IS YOUR 401K WORTH AS MUCH AS YOU PUT INTO IT?
HOW’S YOUR PENSION DOING?
IS YOUR HOUSE LOSING VALUE DAILY?
ARE YOU BETTER OFF?

Posted by: WENDY | September 10, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

DO YOU HAVE A JOB?
Yep.
CAN YOU PAY YOUR BILLS?
Yep, and put away money into my ROTH IRA
DO YOU HAVE ADEQUATE HEALTH COVERAGE?
yes.
ARE YOU SAFE AT HOME, DO YOU FEEL SAFE IN THIS COUNTRY?
I’m a pistol instructor, so sure. I feel very safe.
CAN YOU PAY FOR COLLEGE?
Paying for two kids to go to a private college.
ARE YOUR CHILDREN SUFFICIANTLY EDUCATED?
Hard to say. They aren’t buying the “progressive” line, so I think so.
CAN YOU AFFORD DAYCARE TO LOOK FOR WORK?
No need.
CAN YOU AFFORD GAS?
Yes, but it would be cheaper if we pumped a bit more oil locally.
ARE YOU CARING FOR ELDERLY PARENTS AND CHILDREN AT THE SAME TIME?
Yes. My father, lives with us and suffers from alzheimer’s, but that’s what family’s for right?
IS YOUR 401K WORTH AS MUCH AS YOU PUT INTO IT?
Way more than that. I direct the investments myself.
HOW’S YOUR PENSION DOING?
plus 10%/year for the last 7 years.
IS YOUR HOUSE LOSING VALUE DAILY?
No. I didn’t buy more house than I could afford. (I have two)
ARE YOU BETTER OFF?
Hell yes! Besides paying for my kids college I’m putting my 49 year old wife through medical school.
Folks, this is America! If you stop waiting for the government to do something for you and get off your butt and do it yourself, you can accomplish ANYTHING.
The deal is that you have to EARN it.

Posted by: Chuck | September 10, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Okay, the ‘lipstick pig’ remark can be explained away.
Please expalin the next comment after that one. “You can take an old fish wrap it in paper called ‘change’. It still stinks…”
Women (and men) know that sexist pigs have referred to a part of a woman’s anatomy as ‘fishy’. Obama means “Palin = old fish… still stinks… fishy… stinky…!!!
What next… a lap cat???
WOMEN ARE SICK OF SEXIST PIGS.
OBAMA… THE WOMEN JUST LEFT YOU!!!

Posted by: JanieG | September 10, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

McBush/Palin are ch-ch-CHENEY!

Posted by: Ch-ch-changes are coming - Obama/Biden 08 | September 10, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

I can’t see why anyone would ever vote for Obama. He speaks eloquent words that have no substance. What has he done to prove that he has caused “change” in his political career? I’m not aware of any major change that he caused in the Illinois senate. McCain is the only one that’s proven he can provide change. He has worked with both the democrats and republicans on many issues without regard to their party affiliation.
Obama keeps comparing McCain to Bush because that’s what works. McCain is as far from Bush as a Republican can be. McCain has consistently transcended party lines on many issues. That’s why he hasn’t been the most popular with the republican party. McCain is nothing like Bush, and even if he was, it would still be better than having Obama in the White House.
I also find it funny how he always compares himself to the middle class. No one gets as far as he has without being somewhat wealthy. He’s worth several million dollars. He went to a private high school, then to columbia, then to harvard. Doesn’t really sound like the average middle class person to me? Furthermore, he suggests these tax cuts for middle class. But the funny thing is, these tax cuts are only for people who make less than $42,000 a year. If you make more than that, you’re going to be taxed like crazy. Most factory workers make more than that.
I can’t stand how people keep talking about Palin’s lack of experience. Yea, she doesn’t have that much experience, but it’s still more experience than Obama and he’s running for president. She at least has legislative experience.

Posted by: Jack | September 10, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Tell me why Sarah Palin is still repeating her speech in day 13 of this campaign? With her so call eloquence, intelligence and executive experience; is she incapable of speaking directly to the people of America. What’s the deal here?

Posted by: new york, new york | September 10, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

OBAMA MUST THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ARE STUPID !!!
It’s one thing when Obama tries to cover up mistakes he’s
made in private, or when he feebly tries to cover up or misdirect
us, by saying that he never heard Wright’s anti-American sermons
over a 20 year period … but, when Obama tells us that the
Palin lipstick/pig remark wasn’t an insult directed towards
Governor Palin, then Obama is adding insult to injury towards
the American people. This creep is not Presidential material.

Posted by: Gina | September 10, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

More phony outrage from low information voters and a media out of control. Our election process combined with miserable 24/7 cable channels have become a complete embarrassment.

Posted by: motohara | September 10, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

America to Jake Tapper: putting lipstick on a pig is an idiom that has been part of American English for longer than you have been alive.

Posted by: The Third Policeman | September 10, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

McCain gambled on a Pig Bull and now squeals like a hog.

Posted by: McCain/Palin/Republicans Call a whaaaambulance | September 10, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

*Pit Bull*

Posted by: McCain/Palin/Republicans Call a whaaaambulance | September 10, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

To calliguy55:
If you’re undone about Palin giving the same speech for 13 days….then look to Obama who’s been uttering the same darn thing for 19 months now.
At least Sarah’s statements are full grammatically correct paragraphs that make sense.
Obamas two-worder (less than a one-liner…) “hope” & “change” are getting somewhat tiresome as well – particularly with no back-up to support the words or the promised concepts.

Posted by: beggingthequestion | September 10, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Once again, it is getting close to the time of ridding this great nation of the liberal scum that not long ago enjoyed sucking old King George.
Revolution – Revolution – Revolution

Posted by: hunterwolf | September 10, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

I laughed when read that Obama and his campaign now say that he wasn’t speaking about Palin when he said his lipstick/pig comment.
Does he expect us to believe he hadn’t seen Palins speech or the constant replaying of her hockeymom/lipstick joke?
This is just like him denying that he heard any crazy statments made by his Pastor of twenty years.
NewsFlash Obama!! Despite what your European friends think, Americans aren’t THAT stupid.

Posted by: Shawn S | September 10, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Does anyone remember when Barack put his middle finger across his cheek when he mentioned Hilary during the primaries and he denied that it was intentional.
I think this man has a problem with women.
Does he have any high ranking woman on his campaign staff. I think not.
By the way, I think his mentor Wright’s latest concubine could use some glossy lipstick.

Posted by: Koskidfan | September 10, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

It is an “old expression”…yeah, a very old and overused expression that really is irrelevant here. It is like the kid who gets picked on and then cannot come up with a good comeback. “oh, yeah?…well, well… uh… your mother wears army boots!”

Posted by: JC | September 10, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

The bottom line is that Mr. Nobama needs the white vote and he will only get if on the east and west coasts.He will not get the white vote in middle America. It also appears that Mr. Nobama is running against Mrs. Palin, poor campaign strategy so far. And as far as Joe biden is concerned, he was born with a golden shoe in his mouth…….And he is good at it.

Posted by: SNAKE PLISKIN AND HIS AMAZING FREAK SHOW, Md. | September 10, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Can we call her the Queen of Pork?

Posted by: McCain/Palin/Republicans Call a whaaaambulance | September 10, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I HATE BASEBALL CARDS!

Posted by: lakakoko | September 10, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

I once had respect for McCain and thought he could be a decent President, but all he does now is lie, lie, lie about everything. His ad on TV actually claims that McCain reformed Washington! It’s as if he doesn’t think he has anything to offer so this is all there is–just lie blatantly.
McCain has no honor left at all. He’s become a disgrace. He’s a symbol of everything that is wrong in Washington now.

Posted by: Jill | September 10, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

It was a stupid set of comments by Obama. He will have to spend the next several days explaining himself instead of explaining why he is better than Bush. I believe that it was deliberate, which further illustrates his poor campaigning, a sin of commission. Can’t his political handlers get through to him that he has to rise above all the squabbling and let his surrogates chuck the slime… What a maroon…

Posted by: jkstewart2 | September 10, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

How stupid the news is to let McCain get away with this. Not only has Obama used this phrase BEFORE Palin got on the ticket, he used it CURRENTLY IN THIS CONTEXT (hint to the stupid: it has nothing to do with Palin).
OBAMA: “Let’s just list this for a second. John McCain says he’s about change, too. Except — and so I guess his whole angle is, “Watch out, George Bush, except for economic policy, health-care policy, tax policy, education policy, foreign policy, and Karl Rove-style politics. We’re really gonna shake things up in Washington.” That’s not change. That’s just calling some — the same thing, something different. But you know, you can — you know, you can put lipstick on a pig; it’s still a pig.”

Posted by: Janet | September 10, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm

Now I know how utterly stupid and ignorant many of us Americans are. This country really needs to do something about educating ourselves. We certainly need to make higher education more affordable and more accessible to our people as Obama proposes, because the tirade on this board is truly reflective of a group of ignoramuses, incapable of reading, or listening, in context.
Obama obviously wasn’t referring to Sarah Palin. His context was John McCain. Are Republicans so desperate for an Obama gaffe that they have now begun to see/hear a gaffe in everything he says? How desperate can they be?
You Republican supporters ignore all the lies and dishonesty now evident in Sarah Palin and John McCain. This is the community of Christians who are suppose to be truthful and honest, yet they ignore the huge and obvious lies and deceptions and strain to find fault in the use of a very old saying, which both John McCain and Hillary Clinton employed in their speeches this election cycle. To quote Jesus: they “strain at a gnat and swallow a camel.”
This crop of Republicans [not all] are the most dishonest and hypocritical group of people I have ever come across. Why don’t you guys try a little honesty for a change. Yea, try it! Then you will see a change you can believe in.

Posted by: observer | September 10, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Let’s see… Obama calls Pallin a pig with lipstick and McCain a old fish and somehow that is the Republicans fault. You people are the lunatics. The audience got the reference immediately and Obama followed it up with comments about Pallin being new (even though she has been an elected official longer than he has). Obama should take responsibility for what he said and apologize but I doubt he has the class to do that. If you think it was fine what he said do you think it would be ok if McCain said you can take the turban off and put on a suit but it doesn’t make him Presidential?

Posted by: Rich Doode | September 10, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

More NObama Lies..
Obama said on ABC’s This Week Sunday (September 7, 2008) “I had to sign up for Selective Service when I graduated from high school.”
However, upon further research revealed that Obama graduated in 1979 and “the registration requirement was suspended in April 1975. It was resumed again in 1980 by President Carter in response to the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.” (Info from the official government selective service website below) Thus, Obama’s statement that he ‘had to sign up’ is not true.
Is there no end to this guy lying to us, the American People?

Posted by: electhiway | September 10, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Anyone one who says that they believe that Obama was calling Palin a pig is either a liar (because they want to hurt Obama politically) or an idiot (because they lack the basic comprehensive ability to understand the context of the “lipstick on a pig” phrase).
Shame on you, Jake Tapper, for not printing the full quote.
Shame on you, Jake Tapper, for claiming that you know that the crowd was thinking that Obama was alluding to Palin.
You aren’t a mind reader. Did you ask anyone in the crowd what they actually thought?
Or did you just make it up despite your supposed journalistic integrity?
Or are you hoping to promote a lie by deceptively claiming your own perversion of Obama’s words were the thoughts of the crowd?
I can’t think of any reason why you and the Right would want to lie about what Obama said except to hurt Obama politically.
Nevermind that the concept is beyond ridiculous. Nevermind that Obama would have to be a complete idiot not to realize that it would be political suicide to call Palin a pig. Nevermind that the phrase is commonly used by politicians to refer to policies they oppose.
You conveniently overlook all that to promote this lie.

Posted by: Bryan Arnold | September 10, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Obama keeps talking about Palin like he is running against her for President!! It’s so funny to hear him talk out of his ass. He sounds quite immature with these comments and the rest of the country is finally seeing who he is. He should be talking about issues not these juvenile comments!!! I cant stand listening to him speak without a speech and teleprompter!! He takes too long to answer questions, pauses way too much!! SPIT IT OUT!!!!!!!
Just let the debates get here!!!! McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: heather | September 10, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

I’ll just be glad when it’s all over. Been listening to all this crap for 6 months. Can we add a box to check for who cares.

Posted by: stoplooking12 | September 10, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Really? How do you even see that? I mean wow, the liptick/pig comment, yeah I can see how that could be taken the wrong way but you’re taking another old phrase and inventing some perverted meaning to it. I bet you’re the type of person that can read Nostradamus and be amazed at the accuracy of his predictions.
On the other hand however, I kind of wish the pig/lipstick comment would have been intentional. I mean what’s a pig but a wasteful disgusting creature and when you look at Palin’s earmark requests and other policies that she was involved in you reallly don’t see anything but disgusting waste.

Posted by: Fisher | September 10, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

If it squeals like a pig…..

Posted by: Queen of Pork | September 10, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

While there was no direct mention of Palin, the audience roared and jumped to its feet in a similar fashion. If Barack Obama wasn’t thinking about the joke Sarah Palin told about lipstick and hockey moms at the Republican National Convention last week, the crowd certainly was…laughing and clapping before he even finished the attack.
Perhaps this explains the 20-point net swing in McCain’s favor in the so-called pant suit vote.

Posted by: StopTheAttacks | September 10, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Here is Obama’s plans
Healthcare: Universal Nationalized Healthcare. Another Bureucrat.
McCain-A private healthcare plan you can take with from job to job. No Bureucrat.
Education: Even more Nationalized from Pre-K to College.
McCain-School choice a system that will help those who can’t afford it go to a better school and get a better education.
Energy: Government subsidies for alternatives more taxes on all sources. More regulations.
McCain-Tap all possible resources in America. Drilling Offshore and elsewhere. Natural Gas, Clean Coal, Nuclear, Wind, Hydrogen, Electric, etc. No more sending 700 billion to countries ruled by dictators.
Taxes: He will raise taxes on everyone making more than 42,000 by letting the Bush cuts expire. Then he raise them on those who make more than 200,000. He will raise payroll tax, double Capital gains tax.
McCain-Will make Bush cuts permanant and cut them even more, double the child tax credit. He will others at present level.
Spending: He will introduce $850 billion dollars in new spending, and his cuts will be defense, intelligence, and national security.
McCain-He will put an end to pork barrel spending.
Jobs: Will have a government sponsored jobs program.
McCain-Tax and Energy plan will create growth and jobs. Will put those out of work back to school to train for a new job.
To sum up Obama is a TAX and SPEND, Big Government Socialist. NO THANKS!
We Need John McCain and Sara Palin. They truly understand Americans. They will shake up Washington.
McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: Matthew | September 10, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Here is the real story:
- Obama spent the last 19 months trying to be the comeback kid under Hillary’s thumb. He played every card (race, gender, etc…)and got a free pass for anything he said because he was “behind”. The media loves an underdog and ate up everything he said.
- So, he beat Hillary and came out of the DNC convention ahead.
- Then in comes Palin, the new comeback kid and the media is eating her up. Obama has been cast aside because he’s yesterday’s news. McCain could careless how much press Palin gets because at the end of the day, he’s smart enough to realize he still gets the big office.
- When Palin made her speech at the RNC convention, she owned the “lipstick” remark. Especially after we found out it was off the cuff. Anyone with political savy would understand that it was then off limits. Trying to use it against McCain/Palin is just a trap…and he fell right into it. If Hillary had used the words “pigs” or “lipstick” when discussing heathcare, McCain should get slapped. She didn’t and he rightly used the colloqialism without adverse effect. Where was the outrage when he used it back then. There was none. So, find a new tactic.
Bottom line: He does not know what to do or how to act with his lead. The media can’t help him because they only know how to support an underdog and tear down a leader. The liberal media has been rendered impotent. I mean: what are you going to to when you bash “the man” and you wake up the next morning and you are now “the man”.
The Republicans never expect Obama to actually apologize, but they sure got his button….and they are pushing it!
If he keeps thinking he’s still got a free pass, the Republicans will OWN him! He will be his own undoing. He has to be able to stand on his own two feet.
If you don’t know how to lead, get out of the way.

Posted by: The man | September 10, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

If Barack Hussein Obama wins he will bring back the so-called Fairness Doctrine. Which will eliminate ALL Conservative voices from tv, talk radio, newspaper, magazine, and the net. Books will be ripped from the shelves. Any voice of criticism will be silenced. It will be the Liberal Propaganda machine full throttle no competition again. We will hear what they want us to hear.
Most of what is known about Obama was a result of conservative blogs and talk radio.
So much for Free Speach and Free Press.
What right will they attack next.
For the future of Freedom in America
Vote for McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: Matthew | September 10, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

At least McCain and Palin are smart enough to not say Obama’s plans are like “The kettle calling the pot Black”.

Posted by: Black Kettles | September 10, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Palin’s a pig and a pea brain…how’s that? Is that better? : )

Posted by: new york, new york | September 10, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

She kept our money.

Posted by: Queen of Pork | September 10, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Matthew by you standards. Obama is the conservative who WORKED for the nomination and the change mantle and Sarah Palin is a Token Liberal, who collects our tax dollars to re- distribute wealth.

Posted by: Queen of Pork | September 10, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Obama worked for the nomination. LOL! Are you kidding me the media practically handed it to him. If he was vetted properly 19 months ago we would have Hillary Clinton as the Democrat nominee. She thrashed him badly towards the end but it was too little to late. She was too far behind by the time he was finally vetted a little bit. And as for Palin McCain picked her because of her reform credentials, EXECUTIVE experience, and her ability to get things done. It helped that she was a young woman who is “MIDDLE CLASS” who could effectively communicate. McCain and Palin have proven they are ready to lead and they will earn America’s trust. Unlike Obama who thinks he is already president and believes he is owed it. No you have to EARN it Obama hasn’t. Sorry not this year.

Posted by: Matthew | September 10, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

I’m sure under a Palin Presidency after McCain’s, “SHE” will be a true leader of the world as Maggie Thatcher was! I love how the right folks come along when the world needs them most. Got to love the fight and don’t take it all so seriously–we fight in America but only feelings get hurt and nobody dies. USA USA USA!

Posted by: Aloha Guy | September 10, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

What i see and hear is white women flocking to a candidate who has given one sarcastic and divisive speech that we really don’t know anything about.she is good for our country because she is a white women? A governor? George Bush was a governor? Would you rehire him? Arnold Schwarzenegger is a governor and Jesse the Body Ventura was. Should either of those men run this or be close to running this country.More than likely Mrs. Palin is a hard right wing conservative that has evoked interest from the masses because of her gender.Period.If I was a republican I would be ashamed.It seems John McCain in a very clever and guile manuver has shown that he would rather win an election than properly serve his country.Sarah is the celebrity that John is always calling Barack.We do not know her and in two months I doubt that is enough time to scratch the surface.At this moment in time I am ashamed and appauled at the utter stupidity of some of these women voters.If this election is thrown away because of republican manipulation we have fallen for before…. Hopefully America will wake up! Hopefully America is ready for real change and not this same ole pig with new lipstick, rotten egg painted bright,old car new paint job.America thrived in its last democratic administration.We need a democrat, not a rich old man that has so many homes he can’t count and his beauty queen running mate with her ugly glasses, shrill voice,self righteous attitude and narrow minded ideals.
Obama 08

Posted by: TV | September 10, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Obama claims he wants change? Well then he should have chosen the most voted for and qualified candidate, Hillary Clinton. It makes me sick and angry every day to know that she should be where he is right now. So she can campaign for him til the cows come home but there are many such as myself who will not support someone who has such a blatent lack of regard for her. That’s not enough for me. I’m voting McCain/Palin.

Posted by: Kelli | September 10, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

I am tired of reading the vile filth coming from the libs on this blog. What can I expect they follow their man Obama’s example. If he is elected you will all get what you deserve.

Posted by: Matthew | September 10, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Thanks for the news, Jake!

Posted by: Conley | September 10, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Why do you republicans just let this man, Obama dig his own hole. The more you let him go the deeper his hole will be. His ego is so big now, he thinks he is the saviour of the world. Sarah Pallin can eat his lunch. She is tough enough to best him. The more you continue to whine about what the liberals are doing, the happier it makes them.

Posted by: Jim H | September 10, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

I really hope that, Republican or Democrat, we get a group of people in the White House who are not as hateful and vindictive as this crowd. I believe you are so eager to find what you want to find that you see what is not there. 1. Lipstick on a Pig is an expression politicians use all the time to describe legislation or ideas that they think are no good, but which have been made to look attractive to the average person. If you listen to Obama’s WHOLE statement, you will see that he is talking about McCain’s platform, not his running mate. In fact, McCain used the expression about H.Clinton’s healthcare stance. 2. Obama is not a “secret Muslim.” If you listen to the WHOLE statement, it’s clear what his meaning was, even though he did not word it well. He is talking about how Sen. McCain has not suggested that he is a Muslim. He said, “John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.” I hope that, despite our different opinions about the issues, all of us Americans can learn to seek the truth and reason together rationally to solve our problems. Or is there no hope? It’s up to us, people.

Posted by: Christine | September 10, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Do you Hillary supporters really think voting for a party with a woman on the ticket is the same as voting for Hillary? Palin and Clinton have OPPOSITE opinions on the issues. As a woman, I’m ashamed that Hillary supporters are willing to back any candidate that is female. I thought the women’s movement was about ideas, not body parts.

Posted by: Disappointed feminist | September 10, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

P.S. It’s insulting to both Sarah Palin and to Hillary Clinton. (See my comment below):

Posted by: Disappointed feminist | September 10, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

“This” is a story?!

Posted by: D | September 10, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

After the “debate” debacle, and this crap, consider me and ex-ABC news viewer. I hope others reading this post will follow suit.

Posted by: peter j. | September 10, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

This is much ado about nothing. Palin’s condescending, mean-spirited, snarky acceptance speech showed that she can clearly dish it out, so shouldn’t she be able to take it? Quit whining – he wasn’t talking about you anyway.
Folks have also mentioned the reaction of the Obama crowd. Can’t that reaction be likened to the reaction of the Republican delegates during her speech? Didn’t they laugh and hoot at her demeaning zingers? Isn’t it the same thing?
The man – Talk about Obama not leading. McCain appears to have given up being the top of the ticket to Ms. Palin.
Jayhawk – seems to me that Palin is simply Obama in a skirt. The second coming. As another poster said, people heard one speech (which she has repeated ad nauseum) and they think she’s THE ONE. People are willing to put her a heartbeat away from the presidency when FEW PEOPLE KNEW HER less than two weeks ago. And we don’t have time to get to know her and what she believes. That scares me. And all of this adoration AFTER ONE SPEECH. Isn’t that what Obama detractors accuse his supporters of having done?
Normally the VP pick isn’t that important, but at McCain’s age it is of utmost importance.
TV, your comments were spot on. I mean, is it just me or are there just too many weird parallels between Palin and Obama? Everything his detractors say about Obama can also be thrown right back at her, down to the supposed radical associations – in her case, her husband’s membership in the AIP. She also *did* sit in church and listen to an anti-semitic speech. Why didn’t she get up and leave? What about her children being subjected to that?
In all, I think John McCain was incredibly irresponsible to put someone on the ticket that we have no chance to get to know before election day. She may have more chops than I realize, but I want to know this BEFORE I vote.
Itant questions because it’ll pr hope Charlie Gibson asks her imporobably be the only interview she does. The way the McCain campaign is keeping her on such a tight leash is disrespectful and demeaning to the American voter. We have a right to know who this woman is and what she believes before we vote.

Posted by: Sharon | September 10, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Hmmm…one sentence in my last post seems to have gotten garbled. What I said was that I hope Charlie Gibson asks her the important questions because it’ll probably be the only interview she does.
Apologies for any confusion. : )

Posted by: Sharon | September 10, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

The only people pretending to buy this garbage are the former Clinton supporters who are so racist that they are now going to vote republican. We are not fooled by your sudden change in political affiliation or this desperate fake outrage. The outrage and disgrace is that Republican women like former Republican governor of Massachusetts, Jane Swift, are letting themselves be used in this manner to try to sway even more women into joining the Republican party. The Republican honchos obviously believe that the women of this country are so stupid and vindictive that we will swallow any nonsense they put out. We are not ! Keep trying things like this though, it only shows you for who and what you really are.

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 10, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Independent wrote:
>Liberal Brits have tried to influence >our election in the past and failed >miserably.
Can you please provide an example of that? Which liberal Brit? When?
>And Obama . . . taking the low road >when he gets behind. Plagiarizing from >the Washington Post,
What did he plagiarize from the Post? When?
>hanging out with Weather Underground >terrorists (pardoned by Clinton),
How about the Palins hanging out with secessionists? People who put Alaska – not America – first. Good choice, McCain.
>and nut job preachers.
Her church had a speaker from Jews for Jesus, who spouted anti-Israel rhetoric.
>We are judged by the company we keep.
Yes, we are, so McCain/Palin supporters have no cause to throw stones. Their company includes campaign manager Rick Davis (a former lobbyist for Freddie and Fanny)and numerous Bush aides, some of whom are tutoring Palin on foreign policy now.
And they have the nerve to call themselves the change candidates.

Posted by: Charlotte | September 10, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Can’t you people who are seemingly offended by Obama’s ‘lipstick on a pig’ comment just do a little fact checking? Watch the video of him. He’s directly referring to McCain, he never even mentions Palin. Y’all are pathetic in your lack of due dilligence.
I would think more people should be offended by Palin disparaging Community Organizers than this false controversy. Do y’all mean to tell me that a mayor does more than your local Boys and Girls Clubs, or Women’s or Men’s Clubs, or your Clergy, or your PTA? They’re ALL Community Organizers!!
I personally took great offense to her remarks.

Posted by: JPDem | September 10, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

The lipstck comment by Obama was an intentional remark. All you had to do was watch his body language, the hesitation in his comments and the audience reaction to know it was intentionally said about Palin. It was like he was saying “do you hear me now”.
It is sad that it has come to this!!

Posted by: MEW | September 10, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

The McCain campaign is their own worst enemy. If they were just waiting for the Democratic campaign to take a swipe at Palin based on gender, I’m sure they could have waited for something better. The Republican campaign has repeatedly said that all Obama can do is speak well, and he won’t be able to deliver. Do they really think that the American people are stupid? By using the “Lipstick comment” as their attempt to turn people against Obama, their basic agument would be this: “Barack Obama is a well educated, calculating, and excellant speaker, but that’s all he is, he can’t deliver once in the White House” With that said, the Republican Campaign would like us to believe that the man whom they have dubbed has only one thing going for him, and that is his ability to speak well on all occasions, blatently called Palin a “pig” I have copied the transcript here, inserting Palin’s name.
“John McCain says he’s about change too, and so I guess his whole angle is, ‘Watch out George Bush — except for economic policy, health care policy, tax policy, education policy, foreign policy and Karl Rove-style politics — we’re really going to shake things up in Washington. That’s not change. That’s just calling something the same thing something different. You know you can put lipstick on Sarah Palin, but she’s still a pig. You know you can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change, it’s still going to stink after eight years. We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”
If you read it, with her name in it, it makes no sense. We are supposed to believe that Obama, the excellant speaker, was making a coherant argument, threw in a random sentence about Sarah Palin, and then went back to the original arument? The McCain camp really needs to focus on the issues and stop crying wolf.

Posted by: Josie | September 10, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Check out NPR’s clips of McCain using the same expression. Frickin’ hypocrites.

Posted by: Troy | September 10, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I totally agree with Sharon. If she can dish it then she should be able to eat it. She was absolutely nasty in her acceptance speech–a new comer who wanted to claim her spot–she did and now it’s blowing up in her face. There’s much more where that came from Sarah so toughen up.

Posted by: HyprocriteRepub | September 11, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Obama is too clever not trying to water down the popularity of ‘Lipstick’ which BY NOW pertains to Palin. Of course he will deny it. Of couse he tried to be funny although he sounded more of jackass that a comedian…ever checked those clips some Democrats were not laughing nor smiling at all. Haha no wonder Biden is biding his time smiling towards the 2012 primaries. Palin might not be qualified but look who is talking…Hillary for 2012!!! Kenyans get your son!

Posted by: Bob | September 11, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

John McCain’s daughter Meghan is not taking offense to Barack Obama’s “lipstick on a pig” line like the rest of her father’s campaign, pointing out Wednesday morning that GOP presidential nominee has been known to use the phrase.
“I’ve heard my dad say that, the term ‘lipstick on a pig,’” McCain said during an appearance on Fox promoting her new children’s book about her father.

Posted by: Autumn123 | September 11, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

As a follow up to Sharon’s comments which were right on, I also am sick of hearing what a great speech Palin gave. Anyone who can read can deliver a speech. However, she did not write it, a Bush writer did. Stop calling it her speech. She just spoke it off a teleprompter.

Posted by: Joan | September 11, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

hey …can anyone really answer this question please, and I’m talking to republicans using this cheap line to get into the white house once again…Why is it okay if McCain says it when addressing Hilary, and not okay when Obama uses it? Oh, by the way, he cleary las calling McCain the pig and Sarah the lipstick, and also, McCain the old fish, and sarah the 2008 paper, keep in account she did just come into the picture out of nowhere.
Women stop being so numb-minded, McCain did the same thing, the only difference is, the White House truly knows and believes Obama can be our President, so they’ll take any cheap shot they can take.
But back to my original question, what’s the difference between Obama using it and McCain using it?
Barack the Vote ’08!!

Posted by: Dom | September 11, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

thats a question noone wants to answer because they want to keep McCain’s covered.
What a bunch of dorks ugh

Posted by: Dom | September 11, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

I’m new to much interest in politics. Just one question, a lot of people seem to think Sarah Palin isn’t qualified enough to be V.P. How is Obama more qualified to be President?

Posted by: Elizabeth | September 11, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

–Dom: “Anyone who can read can deliver a speech… She just spoke it off a teleprompter.”
How many speeches have you given? Obviously, you don’t realize how difficult it is to deliver an effective speech. Anyone who can read CANNOT deliver a GREAT speech. If you want a crappy speech, then yes, anybody can do that.
As for speaking from a teleprompter. Where have you been? Hiding in your little cave? The teleprompter totally got off queue throughout most of the speech. It wasn’t stopped for applause. She gave part of the speech off her memory/on the fly.
As for Obama’s reference to a pig, yes it’s an old saying. However, given the HUGE media hype of Palin, hockey moms, and lipstick, it was clearly a reference to her and NOT McCain.
–Bob: “She was absolutely nasty in her acceptance speech.”
She was rightfully standing up for herself after a full week of relentless attack from the media and Democrats. What the hell would you do? Sit back and let people smear you? Yeah, right.
–All
Have you guys neglected the fact that Obama followed the Democratic position 97% of the time versus McCain with 90%? What kind of change is Obama going to bring. NONE! And this whole idea of universal health care by the government is a load of BS. It’s going to put the whole system in more of a mess than it already is.

Posted by: Fernando | September 11, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Am I the only person that noticed that the fish comment was directed to Palin because her nickname is Sarah Barracuda? Seems like Obama is rattled and is now resorting to petty name calling. He could have used many other phrases that didn’t have certain key words that refer to Palin.

Posted by: scott | September 11, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

Does anyone really believe that Barack Obama would have made the lipstick on a pig comment to a black woman if John McCain had chosen one as his running mate?

Posted by: independent1 | September 11, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

About the pig comment, stop being so sensitive, i think he would have said it to ANYONE, i repeat, ANYONE who stands on the same grounds as McCain/Palin does…Obama was clearly refferring to how Republicans have ran the office the last 8 years and has done a horrible job so we do need change.
Let’s get back to politics and off of a stupid saying because we’re trying to see who’d better suit America.
You can’t call something bs if you’ve never even given it a chance, you’re just damning it to hell automatically. As sad as it is, I believe race does have alot to do with what is going on here, not too mention McCain used the qute to and noone’s climbing down his throat about it…
Alot of you republicans are, simply, going republican because you don’t want to see a black man in office/in charge. We’ve seen what Bush did, he’s pretty bad. McCain’s campain includes many of the same people that helped Bush get in office, which means they have similar ideas, which equals horrible.
So in that case, i believe we will be entitled to the same bs we had the previous 8years.
On the flipside, we have a man who promises change, has no affiliations with what Bush has done, and has a clear head on what should be done.
McCain’s sugar-coating the same garbage we heard for 8-years now and that’s not the type of “change” I’m interested in seeing.

Posted by: Dom | September 12, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Her speech wasn’t that great. It was snide and snippy. And yes, I do know how tough it is to give speeches- I was a debater back in school.
Biden clearly owns her when it comes to foreign policy- just watch the interview with Gibson. It’s simply terrifying to me the way she seems to be short on facts and has an overly simplistic understanding of foreign policy.
EVERYONE knows the Georgia started conflict in South Ossetia, and she said that she it was an unprovoked attack by Russia. Gibson even tried to hint to her, saying, “You believe it’s unprovoked?” once more, and she repeated an affirmative. She didn’t know what the Bush Doctrine was. And the way she kept on saying “Charlie” was pretty annoying, and she seemed overly defensive at times.
Like when Gibson asked her if she had met a head-of-state, instead of being honest and saying, “Well no, but I’ve had experience negotiating with people in my capacity as governor, I believe I can adapt to that role too”, she goes on about how most other vp candidates in history likely hadn’t either.
I am a woman, for the record, and I was not offended by Obama’s comment, but I WAS offended by the McCain campaign’s overzealous attempt to blow this matter out of proportion and play victim. Sure even if they thought it might have been sexist, there is NO NEED to play this up to the extent that it’s eclipsing far more important issues if they truly believed in “Country First!”. Enough of the Swift Boating crap already.
Stop screaming sexism at every turn. Why should people not be allowed to use certain words just because she’s a woman, is it? Isn’t THAT sexist, now? I mean COME ON. The word lipstick by itself is NOT a word like say “political lynching” that carries sensitive connotations.
If she is going to whine and cry over an insult after she had taken some not so nice potshots at Obama, I don’t think she can deal with Ahmadinejad, Putin or Chavez who certainly may have some sharp barbs, this time, clearly directed at her without question.

Posted by: Do Not Insult Us Sarah | September 12, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

What in the world are you people doing, Obama keeps saying he is for change, but have you ever heard what that change may be. Check his voting record, he voted “present” on the economic bill. He has no clue what he is doing and the person that stated the Republicans have ran our country, you are very wrong! The democrats want Obama in so that they can change this U.S. to a socialist country. Do you want to be told what to do and how to do it? That is the Democrats theory. Both CEO’s from Freddie Mac & Fanny Mae that got us into this economic trouble are on Obama’s election committee! What does that tell you about Obama! Wake Up.

Posted by: sorenhawk | October 1, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Thomas Sowell wrote this article today:
“Senator Obama’s words often sound very reasonable and moderate, as well as lofty and inspiring. But everything that he has actually done over the years places him unmistakably with the extreme left elitists.
Sadly, many of those who are enchanted by his rhetoric are unlikely to check out the facts. But nothing is a more real or more important issue than whether what a candidate says is the direct opposite of what he has actually been doing for years.
The old phrase, “a man of high ideals but no principles,” is one that applies all too painfully to Barack Obama today. His words expressing lofty ideals may appeal to the gullible but his long history of having no principles makes him a danger of the first magnitude in the White House.”

Posted by: Debbie | October 8, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Part of an article from the debate last night:
“The sky-high gasoline prices Americans paid all summer were effectively an energy tax, brought to us by policies limiting energy production supported chiefly by Democrats like Nancy Pelosi.
Barrack Obama, too, talked up the foreign-policy considerations of dependence on foreign oil. Yet he also made sure to empathize with families for whom $3.80 gas strains the budget. The irony that Senator Obama’s party shoulders much of the responsibility for those high prices.
McCain squandered an opportunity to clarify his differences from Obama on nuclear power. The facts are these: Both candidates claim to support nuclear power, but McCain actually seems to mean it. He supports opening the Yucca Mountain waste repository, a critical step in guaranteeing the expansion of nuclear energy. Meanwhile, Obama vows to shut down Yucca, though provides no alternatives. He’s trying to have it both ways. He can say he supports nuclear, as do increasing numbers of Americans. But he sends an unmistakable signal to the anti-nuclear environmental lobby that, without Yucca Mountain, nuclear power isn’t going to expand on his watch.”
Obama showed why at this late date he is the favorite to win come Election Day. Without any hesitation, Obama stated that we have to prioritize and that energy tops the list. (The fact that Obama said in the first debate that energy would be the first item on his agenda he’d abandon will no doubt be tossed down the memory hole by his cheerleaders in the mainstream media.)

Posted by: Debbie | October 8, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Good stuff written by Thomas Sowell
Senator McCain’s health care plan is built around giving households more control over health care coverage decisions. He would convert today’s income-tax preference for employer-paid insurance into a refundable tax credit that workers and their families could direct to the insurance plan of their choice.
Obama and Biden are trying to scare voters by suggesting, first of all, that McCain’s reform would leave some households worse off than they are today. In fact, most Americans would come out well ahead under the McCain plan, as independent estimates — and common sense — indicate. A middle-class household in the 25-percent tax bracket — that’s married couples with incomes between $65,100 and $131,450 in 2008 — would have to get more than $20,000 a year in employer-paid premiums to be better off today than under the McCain plan. (The average employer contribution to family coverage was $9,325 in 2008, according to this annual survey.) A distributional analysis of the McCain plan by the Tax Policy Center shows all income groups, including the poorest fifth, better off with the McCain tax credit than under current law in 2009.
Senators Obama and Biden have also tried to claim that millions of Americans would be pushed out of employer-based plans under the McCain reform. But this claim is also false. McCain’s proposal would give workers the option to take their credit and apply it to insurance outside of their workplace. In some cases, this would be a rational decision, as it would give a worker portable insurance they could keep even as their employment and life circumstances change.
But there is no reason to believe large numbers of employers would suddenly drop coverage altogether. Job-based insurance would still be very desirable for most workers, as the premiums paid by firms would remain exempt from payroll taxes. For this reason, employers looking to attract and retain the best workers offer attractive health-insurance plans.
As Senator Obama has criticized the McCain plan in recent weeks, one has to wonder whether he even understands his own plan. Indeed, it is Obama’s plan, not McCain’s, that represents the real threat to employer-sponsored insurance.

Posted by: Debbie | October 8, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Do Not Insult Us Sarah – you don’t know what you’re talking about. Republicans would love to see a black man in office, but not your man. I couldn’t have said this better.
“Senator Obama’s words often sound very reasonable and moderate, as well as lofty and inspiring. But everything that he has actually done over the years places him unmistakably with the extreme left elitists.
Sadly, many of those who are enchanted by his rhetoric are unlikely to check out the facts. But nothing is a more real or more important issue than whether what a candidate says is the direct opposite of what he has actually been doing for years.
The old phrase, “a man of high ideals but no principles,” is one that applies all too painfully to Barack Obama today. His words expressing lofty ideals may appeal to the gullible but his long history of having no principles makes him a danger of the first magnitude in the White House.”
another article:
“The public was treated to a different verse of the same song when Obama’s unbelievably corrupt friend Tony Rezko was convicted on 16 counts of mail fraud, wire fraud, soliciting bribes, and money laundering. Rezko’s primary business since 1990 was the buying and selling of political influence. It’s how he came to be first in line for government grants to convert run-down buildings into low-income housing, which he then let deteriorate into slums.
Obama entered into his own land deal with Rezko in the summer of 2005. Rezko bought the property adjacent to the Obama’s dream home and sold him a strip of land on which to build a fence. Obama paid a fair price, but by this point the Chicago papers had run more than 100 stories about the federal investigation into Rezko’s influence-peddling. Obama called his decision to deal with Rezko a “bone-headed move,” but claimed he didn’t know about the corrupt behavior. If so, he was the last person in Chicago.
Now Obama wants us to believe that he didn’t know about Bill Ayers’s terrorist past when he was working with Ayers in the 1990s. As a leader of the radical Weather Underground, Ayers participated in multiple bombings that he says he does not regret. He spent 11 years as a fugitive from justice. Obama and Ayers first met in 1995. In an interview for a book published that year, Ayers described his political views: “I am a radical, Leftist, small ‘c’ communist.”
And regarding Sarah Palin. She has not complained about anything despite the cruel and ignornant stuff that is said about her by the liberal media or idiots like you. She has been so professional and gracious about everything unlike your man who is the biggest cry baby in this election. He sure can dish it, but can’t seem to take it.
Why don’t you look at the facts about Obama before speaking anymore. Obviously you have no clue what he is proposing or saying or you wouldn’t be voting for him if you really knew.

Posted by: Debbie | October 8, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Mentioned a few days ago that Missouri Senator Claire McCaskill’s mild affect masks a bit of a killer, and that she’s perhaps the Obama campaign’s deftest surrogate on the attack.
But I was still kind of amused by her brief interaction with Mitt Romney in the press file just now.
McCaskill was stepping out of her chair at the end of an MSNBC interview, and Romney was up next. She and a staffer unplugged her various wires, and she handed Romney the earpiece the guests use to hear the host.
“I spit on this before I put it in,” she said to Romney, with a sweet smile.

Posted by: Debbie | October 8, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

Really no matter if someone doesn’t understand then its up to other users that they will help, so here it happens.

Posted by: Jospeh Engebretson | January 23, 2012, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.