Obama Sees McCain’s Unrealistic Proposal, Raises
This morning we pointed out that Sen. John McCain’s, R-Ariz., proposal, to limit executive compensation for officers of firms that receive federal aid to $400,000, was not regarded on Capitol Hill as a serious proposal.
In terms of limits on executive compensation, all that Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., had discussed was preventing any golden parachutes for executives of these firms, which, combined with another relatively modest measure or two, is truly about as much as anyone in the negotiations is talking about.
But then, this afternoon in Florida, Obama offered a questionable proposal of his own.
"The American people should not be spending one dime to reward the same Wall Street CEOs whose greed and irresponsibility got us into this mess," Obama said, according to his prepared remarks.
What on earth does that even mean?
Zero compensation for these executives?
A firewall between the government aid and salaries/bonuses for executives?
The Obama campaign has yet to respond to my inquiry as to what this rhetoric means, policy-wise; I will let you know when and if the Obama campaign responds.
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Today, Presidential candidate John McCain demonstrated real leadership in his announcement to temporarily suspend his Presidential campaign to return to Washington D.C. to work toward a bipartisan solution to the nation’s current economic situation.
McCain looks like a President today.
McCain puts his country first and politics second. It’s the right thing to do.
What say you, Sen. Obama (Jake, I don’t understand, uh, uh, uh, uh, the Obama drivel either) to Sen. McCain’s calls for you to join him????
It’s McCain 08 and Hillary 2012. Country first, party second.
Posted by: J | September 24, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
I’m sure they are huddled around a mound of burning campaign cash brain storming their answer, Jake.
Let’s see if the pattern holds. When Obama is ahead, he gets sloppy. When he gets behind, he pulls the race card. Meanwhile, anyone can say anything about Sarah Palin and as he did with Clinton, he puts his chin in the air and says nothing.
2008: The year when sexism trumped racism because holding women down is what men do to stay on top and keeping other women out is what women do to stay on bottom.
Posted by: len | September 24, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
This populist railing against exec compensation by both candidates is such a small part of the issue but its something people want to hear. People want to hear that there are going to be consequences for those in charge. They do not want to hear about how the Smith family lost their home and life savings while some exec walked away with a $5M severance package paid for by taxpayers.
So it sounds great…its just impractical.
At this point I waiting to hear the word “fat cat”.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 24, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
“Today, Presidential candidate John McCain demonstrated real leadership in his announcement to temporarily suspend his Presidential campaign to return to Washington D.C. to work toward a bipartisan solution to the nation’s current economic situation. ”
Real leadership?
Do you think if his poll numbers weren’t cratering and his “Obama has ties to Fannie Mae” attack didn’t blow up in his face they would be doing this?
McCain wasn’t even going to VOTE on the bailout as of this morning.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 24, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Good work, Jake. It’ll be interesting to hear how they will translate that convoluted pandering.
Posted by: Emm | September 24, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
You put the least qualified candidate on your ticket, a candidate who did not even know that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were not agencies on the ticket, and you want the American public to vote for the McCain-Palin ticket.
That’s ridiculous – country first??
Not when that reflects your judgement for your first decision as candidate for President w/any consequence.
You’ve got to be kidding.
Posted by: Nancy Kelly | September 24, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Wow, capitalism is great, isn’t it? Once you get to the top, don’t bother thinking about the long-term future, just run your company and the economy into the ground and then get paid millions by the government for your failure! What could possibly go wrong with an incentive structure like that?
Posted by: Tim M | September 24, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
I don’t think this is a realistic plan but I don’t think they should get a dime of tax payers money.
As for McCain suspending his camp…I’m guessing he took a notice to his poll numbers.
Posted by: Vanessa | September 24, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
what the government is proposing is a new version of a ‘hedge’ fund.. free of accountability and oversight… It’s NUTZ… then they’re going to use the same folks who are responsible for the crisis to help dispose of the assets..and..
everyone involved with the plan gets de-facto immunity.
man, I am in the wrong business..
Mission Accomplished
Posted by: Rex | September 24, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
How come Obama called McCains camp this morning at 8:30 – long before mCSame thought to do anything – he is behind in the polls and wants to look like he knows how to do something – only he cannot mutlitask and so can’t handle the debate Friday…BTW – exactly where does McCain sit at on the treasury?
Posted by: jozy | September 24, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
@Ryan
As opposed to Obama’s “let’s wait and see” plan to determine what position he’ll take this hour, only to end up doing nothing as usual, and then jumping on the bandwagon when McCain’s help is effective?
Yah, let’s blame McCain for wanting to put country first.
Posted by: Emm | September 24, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
I think it’s slightly bizarre that there’s even a question over whether an executive at a company that has failed so spectacularly it needs a government bailout should get a bonus.
Of course they shouldn’t. It’s ludicrous that it’s even an issue. Bonuses should be reward for hard work and success, not for turning up and presiding over abject failure. I mean, I have no objection to people making large amounts of money, but I would prefer it if they didn’t make it for, frankly, sucking at their jobs.
Actually enforcing that would be difficult though. If the government aid was ring-fenced (or firewalled as Jake puts it) so it couldn’t be used for bonuses, the companies would just do it indirectly – take some money out of their own funds to pay bonuses, then spend the aid replacing the funds they just used.
Posted by: Aengil | September 24, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Can the Republicans have a do-over and throw Mitt Romney on the top of the ticket?
Financial Expertise? – Ran large, profitable corporation. Check
Executive Experience – Governor of Massachusetts. Very popular in a very blue state. Check
Internation Relations – Ran the Salt Lake Olympics. Check
Crisis Management (Olympics Corruption) – Threw the bums out. Check
Washington Outsider – Check
Maybe the Republicans will learn their lesson and keep the independents out of the NH primary next time around but I doubt it.
Posted by: Woody | September 24, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Obama was clear that he did not want Bailout money used for golden parachutes and that those salaries did need to be reviewed. He also understands that by being to harsh on those salaries you push the experts out of the industry.
Posted by: Danny | September 24, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
McCain + a republican government + a republican congress have brought the US economy on its knees. What leadership is there: the foudamentals of the US economy are strong (ref: McSame)? Remain reassured thatMcCain can spend 100 years in Washington he will not be able to solve one single economic issue, because he does not know economy. Period. He can go to see his lobbyist and they will tell him what to do which will be anything but not solving economic crisis, but maybe he can buy more cars and houses. McCain is running away from the debate, but he cannot hide. God save America from McPalin. God bless America and God bless Obama. OBAMA/BIDEN08
Posted by: BKMC | September 24, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“As opposed to Obama’s “let’s wait and see” plan to determine what position he’ll take this hour, only to end up doing nothing as usual, and then jumping on the bandwagon when McCain’s help is effective?”
Emm,
Both candidates have essentially the same plan.
Obama’s has been part of his overall economics plans for most of the primary. McCain whipped his up this week after floundering about.
McCain cosponsored a bill in May of 2006 dealing with mortgage crisis.
Obama authored & intro’d a bill in Feb 2006.
Obama has been talking about this crisis far more than McCain has.
Congress began working on the bailout Monday amid great acrimony.
The differences between Mon and Wed are McCain’s poll numbers (including those on who would better handle the economy) are cratering and his attack on Obama for Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac blew up in his face.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 24, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
“Maybe the Republicans will learn their lesson and keep the independents out of the NH primary next time around but I doubt it.”
They kept them out of the CA primary.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 24, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
When John McCain is elected President, please coordinate your schedules because he will be busy running the country, unlike Obama who either has a fantasy plan that can’t be accomplished or has no plan so he waits until McCain’s plan proves successful and then claims it was his plan all along.
Posted by: Emm | September 24, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
J: You are soo soooo right… McCain does put his country first…. that is why he voted several times this past 8 years on issues and bills that made the rich richer and we.. you and I… are now going to pay for those votes your boy McCain has made… oh, not to mention our children and grandchildren. So you are right in thinking McCain puts his country first.
Posted by: beck | September 24, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
This idiot Obama just said that in 40 days either he or McCain would be responsible for the economy. So now November 6 is Inauguration Day?
Is there even a full brain between Obama and Biden? They’re in a contest to see which one can make the dumbest statements!
Posted by: marylou | September 24, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
it seems to me that Obama is saying what we here in the middle are saying. When I have been laid off in the past, I got a two-week severance and a “good luck finding another job” type comment. That’s what they deserve, if that. They need to know what it’s like to not know where the next mortgage payment is coming from, and if we hand them $5M on the way out the door that will never happen.
Posted by: Dee | September 24, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Well generally people who apply for welfare don’t make seven figure salaries. They should have their pay suspended immediately. They should be lucky to not end up in preison. A pay cut is the least of their worries. If they lose some of their multimillion dollar residences, oh well.
I think it would be better to leave these institutions alone and give every American household 10,000.
Posted by: s.b. | September 24, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Obama called McCain at 8:30 this morning in an attempt to issue a “joint statement”. In other words, Obama is afraid to stand on his own two feet and put forth a strategy for the economy lest it come back to haunt him.
Obama just told Congress “if you need me, call me”. In other words, you can most likely get along without me and anyway I have more important things to do than show up at work and actually do the job I’m being paid to do.
This ain’t leadership folks; it’s pathetic!
Posted by: marylou | September 24, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
The prodigal son returns. John McCain has announced that America is finally confronting a crisis that he doesn’t feel he can be absent for.
Some fun facts about John McCain: Of all Senators, John McCain has been the most absent. There have been 643 votes taken in the current Senate session: McCain has missed 412 of them.
McCain has not voted in the Senate since April 8th. Since March, he has missed 109 of the last 110 votes.
He missed votes on the GI Bill, energy policy, and in 2007 he missed “all 15 critical environmental votes in the Senate” — giving him a 2007 rating of 0% from the League of Conservation Voters. Zero percent? I don’t think that’s fair. I think they should have given him an “incomplete”, and told him that he had to stay for summer session if he wants to graduate from the Senate.
So welcome back, John McCain. If I were the Senate Democrats, I would now completely rejigger the Senate schedule in order to put things up that America would really, really like to see John McCain cast a vote on. It seems the least we could do.
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 24, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
McCain and Obama should be placed as the CEO’s.
Since neither one has a lick of business experience, they are both worth about $0.00.
And as a bonus…..they couldn’t possibly be more stupid or bigger crooks than Franklin Raines. Right there we save $90M.
Posted by: notafool | September 24, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Bee and Dee
If you are worried about your mortgage, don’t even think about bankruptcy. Seems Biden killed your chances when he decided to favor banks instead of consumers.
Posted by: Steve | September 24, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Claiming Credit for a Done Deal
A plugged in reader who’s a Democratic lobbyist writes in with a good point:
The deal on the “bail out” is 98% done. Treasury has capitulated on almost every point. A draft is circulating on the Hill now. No one needs McCain to help do the remaining 2%….except the White House who has no standing on this matter on the Hill with either Democrats or Republicans.
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 24, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Ryan C,
Hahahahaha, you’re too funny. John McCain speaks out in support of a bill that might have actually prevented this disaster from happening (Regulation of GSE’s) and what do you respond with? “Well Barry authored up a bill on MORTGAGE FRAUD”. The problem isn’t fraudulent practices, a sub prime loan is not fraudulent.
Posted by: Zaggs | September 24, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
“There have been 643 votes taken in the current Senate session: McCain has missed 412 of them.”
Is this an implication that the Senate was actually doing something useful.
LOL
The more they do, the more trouble the country is in.
Posted by: notafool | September 24, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
J
this is a complete political stunt, after obama suggests they release a joint statement mccain realizes his only chance is to act out first and act like he came up with this idea
and bringing both campaigns to the hill would not do anything to speed this up
this is just a political stunt because mccain is failing in the polls
why cancel teh debates, why do the debates have anything to do with this?
that is the proof that this is a political stunt
wow pathetic
he should just suspend his campaign for the presidency
doesnt cast a vote in 4 months and suddenly when the bill is almost done he calls to fix it
cmon, sucha joke, what a joke
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 24, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
I love how McCain suspended his campaign “immediately.”
And by immediately, he means after he makes some important campaign stops from today through tomorrow night.
But Friday…. the day of the debates…. he’s gotta put country first. And by Put Country First, he means hide out for a few days and hope the public forgets about the economy, so they can debate more important things like, how Obama is a celebrity, how is he knows a guy who knows a guy who is a repeat jaywalker.
Posted by: Blip | September 24, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Yah, blame McCain’s past 8 years of votes as the main cause of today’s crisis. Can’t even respond to this one it’s so ridiculous.
Of course the MSM is jumping on the “suspend the debate” suggestion because it would mean their Friday night McCain bashing followup reports would have to be postponed until Monday???? and they wouldn’t have anything to whine about all weekend so they’ll be scrambling for material since Obama will be “here if ya’ll need me” instead of actually helping.
Geez, he just asked to postpone Friday, not suspend the entire debate schedule. Ya’ll jump from A to Z more times than Obama can say “uhhhhhh.”
Posted by: Emm | September 24, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Obama responds: ‘Exactly the time’ for a debate
Obama, speaking to the cameras in Florida, rebuffs McCain’s proposal:
“It’s my belief that this is exactly the time the American people need to hear from the person who in approximately 40 days will be responsible with dealing with this mess,” he says.
“What I think is important is that we don’t suddenly infuse Capitol Hill with presidential politics,” he said.
There’s also a real shot at McCain:
See Also
“Presidents are going to have to deal with more than one thing at a time,” he says. “It’s not necessary for us to think that we can do only one thing, and suspend everything else.”
Obama also conveyed a bit of irritation that McCain had gone public this afternoon, soon after the two men talked about a joint statement.
“The only possible miscommunication might have been how quickly there was an announcement and somebody was on television,” Obama said. “My assumption was that the joint statement would go out – initially.”
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 24, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
if the bailout costs each person in the country $2300, then each person in the country should get $2300 worth of stock in these companies in return. We should also have oversight on how much money the crooks/idiots in charge of them make, and absolutely tie their compensation to increasing the value of that stock.
Posted by: tim | September 24, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
I dunno about you…
But I’d like to see a strapping young community organizer take some flabby old millionaire apart on national TV right now.
Posted by: Blip | September 24, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
“They kept them out of the CA primary”
True enough. California is a tough state for any conservative to win even in the Republican party. See Scwarrrtzzenaagarr. (sp) New Hamshire really took the wind out of Romney’s sails. Next door to Mass. he should have won easily but didn’t. He won every county if you count only the Republican vote. It was a tide turner.
Would it have changed CA in Romney’s favor? Probably not but you never know. NH saved McCain, it turned his entire campaign around and the money started flowing.
Anywho, I’m sure there are a lot of Republicans with buyer’s remorse these days. Oh well, buy gold and head for the hills!
Posted by: Woody | September 24, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
The debate whould be about political criminality, not executive compensation.
No amount of executive compensation will ever cost the country a trillion dollars……but Carter/Clinton/Franks just did
And just so you understand what a trillion dollars means, that is the amount of Federal (not SSN) taxes paid by the country yearly.
So, for the 60% of tax-filers who actually pay taxes (instead of getting rebates from people who do pay)….your tax bill is going up by the equivalent of 1 whole year’s taxes, plus interest.
You can thank liberals buying votes by giving free housing to their “voter” for that bill.
Posted by: notafool | September 24, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
for someone who tried to downplay the clinton white house years, and demonize bill and hillary clinton.
has anyone else noticed how on the economic team, obama has surrounded himself with the people bill clinton carried to the white house?
where is the change?
where is obama’ new blood people/
he beat the clinton’ on the promise to the people he has fresh and new.
and then turns around and hires all the clinton people.
Posted by: j | September 24, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Zaggs:
Exactly…fraud is VERY hard to prove, and legislation against it wouldn’t have prevented anything. In any case, fraud is already illegal in every state, making Obama’s legislation (haven’t read it so-) likely puffery.
My sense is that even if every mortgage contract had said “you may take a bath on this loan in two years because we will jack up the interest on you…” on the front page, people would still have bitten and tried to ride to the top of the bubble. “who cares! Just refinance on our equity balloon! Whoo hoo!” No matter how much “transparency” you have, people will still take unreasonable risks if they are grabbing for the brass ring.
Posted by: Wade | September 24, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Dear Steve,
I beleive the Bankruptcy bill you criticized Biden for was also passed by the GOP controlled congress and signed by the GOP President. You are not trying to distort reality are you?
Posted by: Goodness | September 24, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Excellent post, Wade. About time somebody brought up the living beyond ones means reason. The same people that think they can live their whole life on credit cards.
Posted by: Emm | September 24, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Gawd, I can’t believe how ignorant the writer(s) of this post are. The same goes for Barack Obama, unless (of course) he spouts this nonsense for political purpose.
Having written executive compensation contracts for years, I can tell you that these are terms and agreements that are made in conjunction with the hiring of the top 5 office holders.
Many of these executive leave other places of employment in order to be hired by the receiving company. The terms and conditions of employment in the new company reflects the compensation offset lost from the prior employment.
Such considerations include: deferred compensation (old employer v. new), the marketplace or salary of similarly placed incumbents, etc.
Can Congress claw back some of this compensation? Possibly, particularly any performance based pay components.
But Obama shows complete ignorance in suggesting he (without thorough legal investigation of each pay package) can avoid paying these individuals not one dime.
Clearly Obama is playing to the audience (as he did in Berlin, etc. etc.) in effect a poser.
Posted by: Captain America | September 24, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
We all know that with a GOP and BUSH in the Whitehouse there will have to be a Trillion dollar bailout involved. Bush 1 signed the half Trillion dollar RTC S&L Bailout. Junior not to be outdone will sign a 3/4 of a Trillion dollar bailout for his Wall Street hangover buddies. Please send a thank you note to the GOP for creating the worst financial disasters in our nations history. The GOP, we fail and you pay. The Motto of losers.
Posted by: BUSH 2 OUTDO BUSH 1 | September 24, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
OBAMA JUST CALLED McCHICKEN’S BLUFF!!
Obama says the debates are on and the campaign continues!!!
You can’t run away and hide McCain, the American people see your attempted political stunt for what it is!!!
NO TIME OUTS FOR YOU!!!!
Posted by: Davis | September 24, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
McSham is a joke! All the republican spin on this blog is a joke. He needs to man up and do the debate, what the hell will congress need his non economic mind for? McSham is just stalling..cowboy up and take your medicine McSham!!
Posted by: Tired of repub bull..... | September 24, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
I think it is totally reasonable to specify how our taxes are going to be spent.
Posted by: Blip | September 24, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
I don’t think they should get a dime. They’ve made millions already.
Posted by: cincyr | September 24, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
and exactly how many times did obama back down from hillarys challenge to debate? i lost count. at least this time it is being done for a valid reason which is to return to doing their jobs.
MYES MULTI TASKING IS PART OF THE JOB BUT SO IS PRIORITIZING ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTRY.
Posted by: colorado | September 24, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
The GOP is going to need McCain’s vote… they are going to need every vote they can get… to pass a bailout package that is going to be acceptable to their donors.
Posted by: Blip | September 24, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Bet Sarah Palin is sorry she accepted now.
Posted by: kris | September 24, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Actually, I’m sure that it’s one of the signs that the rapture is coming. I gotta check my Left Behind books.
She’s probably kind of giddy about it.
Posted by: Blip | September 24, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
THIS IS LEADERSHIP
McCain makes a statement & runs
Obama makes a statement & stays to answer tough questions.
A candidate Obama or president doing more than 1 thing at a time “We got big airplanes”
Posted by: watching | September 24, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Thanks Emm!
Posted by: Wade | September 24, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
“He needs to man up and do the debate”
This from a supporter of the guy who was too afraid to appear with McCain at Saddleback, and too afraid to have joint town-hall meetings where he couldn’t depend on his sycophants in the press.
Obama is afraid to do anything if his knee-breakers aren’t around.
Why is this effeminate thug so anti-war anyway? Based on his campaign, you would think he’d have a pink knife in his teeth at every opportunity.
Posted by: notafool | September 24, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
“Would it have changed CA in Romney’s favor? Probably not but you never know. NH saved McCain, it turned his entire campaign around and the money started flowing.”
CA would be tough for any of the GOP candidates except McCain.
I agree on NH & McCain though. While everyone was focused on Hillary after NH McCain rode that momentum to smash Guiliani in FL.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 24, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
On Obama, you have a valid point. What are the constraints?
But everybody seems to be avoiding another obvious point. Ever since my corporate days, I’ve been hearing that if government were run like a corporation – we’d all be in much better shape. For decades I’ve been hearing this BS mantra from the John McCain types. Except I worked in the private sector – for the company that automated AIG and I always thought: are you out of your mind? These fools are clueless. So now we have to pay for their cluelessness? Or rather, we have to pay, our kids have to pay and our grandkids have to pay. And to add to it, we are taking another step towards nationalism? As in communism? If it didn’t work in the Sovier Union, why in the heck are we trying it here?
Posted by: mara | September 24, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
“and exactly how many times did obama back down from hillarys challenge to debate? i lost count.”
They had 22 debates.
Hillary needed the debates because she was running her campaign in the red.
McCain refused to debate Huckabee when they were the last two candidates.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 24, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
I’m appaled at some of the things people have said here. There are many ignorant and racist people in this country. It is a fact, please deal with it. Each presidential campaign ends up being a popularity contest, not about concrete and substantial facts and issues. IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP HAS FAILED THIS COUNTRY. Senator Barack Obama and the democrats have convinced me that they at least have an alternate plan to the reckless approach the current administration has taken. How can anyone in their right mind continue to put a republican in office while we are fighting 2 wars, our young men and women dying, and our economy has crashed
Please wake up and do not be scared of change. Racism has no place in this country. Speak to young americans and you will find out that racism can be overcome
Posted by: cc | September 24, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
“Zero compensation” is not really a fair assessment of the situation. If the government doesn’t bail them out one nickel, but all these executives are allowed to keep their years of paychecks, then I guess they’ve been compensated.
Guess what? When real people get fired from real jobs where they do real work, typically they don’t get any “compensation” for that (especially when they’re fired because they suck at their job and they’ve cost the company money). If these guys want gov’t compensation, I say let them eat unemployment.
Posted by: Mr. Me | September 24, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Obama is right a president needs to be able to multitask, not do one thing at a time, McCain was just hoping Obama would follow his lead, so he would come out on top, well guess what it didn’t work!
Posted by: Kathy | September 24, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Those crooks should not get any of our money and if they do we should all have a protest! And McCain wants to give them each $400,000, are you kidding me? No way!
Posted by: Kathy | September 24, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
seems pretty clear to me, Jake, that Obama doesn’t want executives walking away with windfall profits / bonues in the millions, as usual, with our tax bailout dollars.
Posted by: candotwothingsatonce | September 24, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Obama may have forgotten but he and McCain are both Senators. They are supposed to be two of our elected and salaried leaders; in fact… it is their *main* responsibility.
Obama keeps saying that McCain should be able to do more than one thing at time. That’s *really* funny coming from Obama… a man that has done virtually nothing *but* campaign for a big part of his career and for all of the last 2 years. He may see no need to be involved beyond standing on the sidelines and criticizing but I am damn glad that McCain considers his day job to be more important, at this time, than a few speeches and a debate.
It took both parties to get us in this mess… it’s going to take every last one of them to even begin to get us out. Øbama needs to give up the partisan one-upmanship, and yes… the campaigning, for a moment and do his job. What a foreign concept for him.
Posted by: heart.puma | September 24, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
What are they going to do for the Americans who have already lost their homes? Those people living in homeless shelters, tent cities, or who have to start all over again? These people and their children will suffer greatly, the parents credit have been destroyed. Do they get their credit restored like the big banks who prayed on them?? I think the government should go after the CEO’s and the SMART people not only take the bonus money, but take the homes,cars,yachets,summer homes, pensions and apply their money to this bailout. And any person knowing this was going on and didn’t report it, or tried to mislead the American people about the shape of the economy should also lose everything they have or will have including President Bush. How about that new retirement home he built that should put a dent in this debt he is expecting the American people to pay for through our hard work.
Posted by: Patricia | September 25, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am
PUMA -
The economy’s in meltdown. We’re fighting two wars. AQ’s resurgent. People are losing their homes. 600,000 people have lost their jobs so far this year. Gas costs $4.00 per gallon.
And you’re obsessing about whether or not Senator Obama’s really an American?
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 25, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am
Using the pretext of helping the poor home owner or homeless: Who are qualified and who are not? Where is the crossing line?
1. The healthy and strong young men going around asking for free money at every joint in the broad daylight while there are plenty of $8-$10 jobs right in front of them? I am tired of them. Not a penny for them anymore.
2.Those who can’t afford but buy expensive houses and now waiting for bailout? Living in Washington DC areas, I saw plenty of those greedy people driving flashy cars. Many even bought more than one houses paying interest only. I am supposed to bail them out as they are facing foreclosure??
It makes one puke to read ; “I want to help those who are facing foreclosure.”
God, Devil and the liars themselves know that is the truth.
Posted by: Hanna T | September 25, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
I am sick to death of you people harping on Hillary and Obama’s debates. What you people do not realize is there were 22 debates when Obama turned her down. Obama and McCain has not had any debates and we have less then 40 days left. Don’t try to put this mess in Obama’s camp. McCain is wrong, he knows it and so do you guys. So quit trying to take up for the man. The man is throwing another Hail Mary pass and only fools will fall for it this time.
Posted by: Cyndeewi | September 25, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Obama is the One who will heal our country and undo the years of wrongs by making people truly equal.
McCain can say anything he wants but he and the Republicans are through.
“We are the ones we’ve been waiting for. We are the change that we seek.”
- Barack Obama, Super Tuesday
Posted by: obama ascension | September 25, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm