By Rigel Anderson

Sep 1, 2008 9:06pm

Obama Supporters: The High Road is the Right Road But….

ABC News’ Andy Fies reports: Although Barack Obama has said the pregnancy of Gov Sarah Palin’s unwed teenaged daughter is “off-limits” and has “no relevance”, not all of his supporters agree.

Clinton Wray and his family sat among the 14,000 who gathered to hear Obama speak in Milwaukee this evening.  While he supported Obama’s decision to, in Wray’s words, “take the higher ground”, he was not convinced the pregnancy is irrelevant. “Republicans will say that they are the party of family values and that everybody else doesn’t have any values. So when you’ve used that, I think the public and the media have the right to use whatever you’ve put out to come back to you.” 

Wray added that this applied to Palin too. ”This young lady is saying that she’s a strong conservative with Christian values.  That’s great.  But the Republican party has consistently used the religious right to say ‘we’re Christians,’ to say ‘we don’t believe in this and we don’t believe in that.’ And so I think they have to be held accountable…. She has to be held accountable.” 

Though Anthony Davis said he understood the hypocrisy argument made by people like Wray, he believes “the situation is a family matter that they have to deal with.  To use that as a political tool, I don’t see that.”

Teacher Megan Kelly, who is raising a 16 year old, agreed it was not a good idea to make an issue of the pregnancy but was sure others would.  Referring to Obama’s hands-off approach, she said, “I think it’s a good answer for him to say that it doesn’t matter because it really shouldn’t.  But I think that it will, especially given McCain’s views on things, I feel like that’s going to be a big issue for people that are against him.

They are going to be bringing it up over and over again.”  Though she is against that strategy, she said she understood it: “If he’s running on very conservative family values, I think that kind of diminishes his viewpoint.”

Supporter Bonnie Greasby called the situation a “private matter” and that it made Palin more like a “real person”.  But she said the Republicans were to blame for “trying to paint her as the perfect woman and it brings it back that she’s not.”

Asked what might happen if the situation were reversed and the democratic candidate was the one with the pregnant teen daughter, Greasby and friend Linda Devitt laughed.  Devitt said, “They’d be all over him.  He’d be a terrible father.”

User Comments

I personally do NOT care if Palin’s teenage daughter is pregnant. I agree with Obama that that is a family matter and shouldn’t be part of our politics.
HOWEVER, the main question is NOT about Palin but about John McCain. Did McCain thoroughly vet Palin? This relevation as well as others (she is part of Alaska fringe group, she was for the bridge to no where before she was against it, she was instrumental in running Ted Stevens 527s, etc).
This is more about McCain’s JUDGEMENT on choosing someone who isn’t fully vetted AND who has very little experience particularly foreign policy experience.
McCain is 72 years old with many bouts of cancer. It is obvious to me that McCain has FAILED his first presidential duty which is pick a vice president who can start the job as president on day #1.

Posted by: vickie | September 1, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

last line is absolutely right… it goes to show what thugs the republicans really are.
scrutinize the other person beittle mame destroy… dig deeper and get more dirt then you could ever bring up…
but if its the repubs getting the attention its…. off limits, its not a good idea to bring it up…
it shows what values democrats have… we know people are human and F up and we dont want to exploit someone for human faults.
lol its lame, i think we should grow a few pairs, but i must say i do it too.
i think we are hte party of values

Posted by: bhrandon | September 1, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Is McCain thinking with the right head?

Posted by: Bill in NC | September 1, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Face It: They Didn’t Vet Her
Earlier I noted Andrea Mitchell’s reference to reports that the McCain camp had just sent a team of GOP lawyers up to Alaska to do what I guess you’d call a post-vetting of Sarah Palin. Now George Stephanopoulos appears to have more. George says the McCainers are sending a “rapid response team of about ten operatives that includes lawyers” to do the aforementioned deeper vet. A lot of attention is being given to Gov. Palin’s daughter’s situation. The much bigger deal is the expanding trooper-gate investigation, the fact that Palin lied in her Friday speech about her purported opposition to the Bridge to Nowhere, her apparent former membership in the secessionist Alaska Independence Party, and more. Individually, you can come to your own judgment about how consequential these stories are. What they show pretty clearly now — in addition to the news that the McCain campaign is only now sending in a vetting team — is that John McCain didn’t do any serious vetting of Palin before he invited her to join his ticket and, he hopes, become Vice President of the United States.
Fundamentally, of course, this is about John McCain. And the real issue here is what this slapdash decision says about his judgment.
–Josh Marshall

Posted by: bhrandon | September 1, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

The Palin girl’s pregnancy SHOULD be off limits because it IS a private matter. They are handling it the way they see fit and they have the right to do so. What I object to is the fact that they do not want to grant other families the same right. No one, and I mean no one, is going to tell me that I do not have the right to determine what is best for me when it comes to birth control, pregnancy, or family planning. Politicians of all denominations need to stay out of our bedrooms and mind their own business.

Posted by: cat on a hot tin roof | September 1, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

I just think that the way the Republicians attack every little thing, all is fair and appropriate in return. Seems their abstinence policy works about as good as the rest of their values. Yeh, right….

Posted by: JonySky | September 1, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Who cares? I would rather have a pregnant 17 year old than an empty suit who is in Rezko’s backyard and Jeremiah Wright’s pulpit.

Posted by: Samantha | September 1, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

“Children are like wet cement. Whatever falls on them makes an impression.” Dr. Haim Ginott.
I think Governor Palin should turn down the VP offer and take care of her family.
http://SmarterToddler.net

Posted by: Jessie | September 1, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Obama is from the Chicago corrupt political machine. That is how he got started and continued with his political career. Some 10 to 15 fellow Chicago friends have been indicted or now seating in jail and Obama is still under investigation for his part in that as well the death of his good homo buddy, Donald Young.
Funny, he says he is with the Party of Values. LOL FOS.
It is the democrats who have their head in the sand or elswhere.

Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

: Samantha
Why don’t you spread your legs for Levi!
Btch!

Posted by: roxanne | September 1, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Family values:
If you are passing judgment on Sarah Palin that her daughter got pregnant, then you are passing the same judgement on Obama’s grandmother, who’s daughter got pregnant out of wedlock too. Remember the grandmother, who Obama said was one of the smartest people in the world, from whom he still gets advice?
Experience:
YOu Obama people have to STOP with the foreign policy experience accusations, it doesn’t fly anymore. Palin has negotiated a pipeline with Canada, bringing more energy to the US than Biden ever negoatiated in his entire career. She also manages the National Guard in Alaska, which is the first ballistic system on guard for the US for any missile attack on the US, and therefore is active 24 hours, the only one of it’s kind in the US. For that, she gets special security briefing.
Do NOT attack Palin’s foreign policy experience, until you are able to defend Obama’s experience, which is ZERO. and yet, Obama is at the top of the ticket. Why does a VP have more foreign policy experience than the Prez? It’s absurd.
McCain/Palin 2008

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 1, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

spin spin spin good lord. I for one do not believe McCain knew of this ahead of time and went ahead with the Palin pick over Pawlenty. McCain had no choice but to say he knew about this ahead of time other wise saying he did not know would say something about his decision making …
that she was not properly vetted and he selected her anyway … that he made a decision without spending the appropriate amount of due diligence …
anyone who thinks he knew and went ahead with the Palin pick is lying to themselves …
thank goodness for the hurricane so that the full limelight of the media was not on the RNC and allowed folks to circle the wagons and decided how they were as a group going to spin this …
jeesh ….

Posted by: jp2 | September 1, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Mary
Mary, You’re off topic but that’s what you hypicrites do! You can’t add to this conversation so you lash out at Obama. He didn’t know up the little slut! Why don’t you go to the Christian Conservative website with you bullsht talking points!

Posted by: roxanne | September 1, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

spin spin spin good lord. I for one do not believe McCain knew of this ahead of time and went ahead with the Palin pick over Pawlenty. McCain had no choice but to say he knew about this ahead of time other wise saying he did not know would say something about his decision making …
that she was not properly vetted and he selected her anyway … that he made a decision without spending the appropriate amount of due diligence …
anyone who thinks he knew and went ahead with the Palin pick is lying to themselves …
thank goodness for the hurricane so that the full limelight of the media was not on the RNC and allowed folks to circle the wagons and decided how they were as a group going to spin this …
jeesh ….

Posted by: jp2 | September 1, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Hello,
That is enough of hypocrisy. The Republican Party has been made of people who wanted to be the clean America that looks down on certain on some communities / people with unprivileged social backgrounds where teen pregnancy is more common . I can’t imagine what we would have seen on some right wing networks if that had happened to a democrat candidate. That would have been “bad candidate, the decadence of family values, typical of the liberal bankrupt moral values, blah, blah, blah…”
Who has been putting pins like “Obama baby Mama”? You got that right: the Republican Party.
This is the party who has been preaching abstinence and no sexual education for religious reasons. I do not blame anyone for the pregnancy and certainly the young lady who is going to have a child (and probably a beautiful child, if he/she is as healthy as teen mother). But her politician grand-mother is a blatant failure, a failure in teaching proper sexual education to her daughter, promoting contraception. This mother lives in denial of what is reality. I wonder how much warning and explanation she brought to her daughter. If this type of approach fail with your own child, shouldn’t it be time to reconsider this view and recognize that teaching kids sexual education will help them decide when is the right time to have a child???

Posted by: Geoffrey Fouvry | September 1, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

decentAmerican |
Right! Let’s see if Bristol makes it to Harvard!

Posted by: roxanne | September 1, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Palin is pimping her daughter with her pro-life BS! Both she and McCain are proponets of teaching abstinence in schools. More of the do as I say, not as I due crap! Total Hypocrits! Suck It!

Posted by: roxanne | September 1, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

It’s a bit amusing to hear the democrats all posting that she should stay home barefoot and pregnant. Don’t bother to post an abc “news” acticle as support. Their whole site now reads like an Obama blog. But you gotta hand it to them, they sure put on an increadable 2 day smear campaign on short notice. If you can say somethink interesting, don’t reply.

Posted by: Sputnik571 | September 1, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

I remember the RULE that Chelse Clinton not be written up, quoted, even have pictures of her published that were not vetted by the White House. It has been a long standing rule to keep the kids out the public media.
Here it seems that those rules are being tossed aside.
Chelse tried to hide behind controlling the press even this year at her appearances while stumping for her mom. That was laughable. She is an ADULT not a minor and actively engaged in campaigning. This young lady is 17.
Can someone please cite and correct me if I am wrong as to the previous Clinton policy on their child and the media. This should be a rule for EITHER party and all the press or it should be open season. One must choose or admit to bias either from the left or the right.
My 2 cents.

Posted by: Jfox | September 1, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

I feel sorry for Palin’s daughter being thrust into public spotlight like this. It wasn’t her choice, it was her mother’s. Good for Obama for taking the high road. But what hypocrits her fundamentalist supporters are to say stay out of this family’s affairs! Palin is the one who would stop someone else’s daughter from having an abortion, even if it was because of rape. She would stop sex education classes other than abstinence only because it’s what SHE believes. (It didn’t work out too well for her own daughter, did it?) She and her supporters want to shove their religious and political beliefs down everyone else’s throat and condemn those that disagree. I guess they can dish it out but not take it.

Posted by: susan | September 1, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Reality is this woman wants to be VP, ti think that what happens in her family doesn’t matter is absurd. When has personal matters of our President or VP didn’t matter?
Fine her 17 year old daughter is pregnant, happens all the time, you stick with them give, them the support they need, they grow up, become contributing adults and life goes on. So why didn’t they see fit to make it known from the start? They had to know that they could not hold the information back. One more example of poor judgement.
Troopergate
Stevens 527
Alaska Independent Party
Bridge to nowhere
abuse of power when Mayor
No vetting
What is next?

Posted by: Thinking | September 1, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

The vitriole spewed on all of these blogs is absolutely insane!
Democrat, Republican, or Independant, how can you call yourself an American when you ALL stoop to such low levels debate! Be ashamed! What are we teaching our children about the American way of life and democracy?

Posted by: averagejoe | September 1, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

It is a plain as the nose on your face why MCBUSH chose a woman he thinks now he will get all the Hillary votes, guess again. MCBUSH has had his nose up the texas mafia butt so long i am surprised he can breathe

Posted by: Rose Szymanski | September 1, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

The Republican Party is being held hostage by the Religious Right . This puppet has practically ruined Palin’s family. If he knew that Palin’s daughter was pregnant, he should have reconsidered his decision to offer her the opportunity to be his running mate. Palin would have emerged in 4 years and become a power house. As it stands, we now have America questioning her capabilities as a mother. In order for this ticket to win, she has to convince the American people that she is a great mother and not a distraction.

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

A lot of daughters, mothers and grandparents can relate to the Palins and their daughter in regards to this matter.
It is, after all, part of the human condition – it’s called living.
PUMA!

Posted by: LeeLee07 | September 1, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Hang in there Sarah Palin. The media onslaught was absolutely predictable and indicates they truly fear you. Always remember that you share the stage with a candidate who is a famous plaegerist and another who participated in shady real estate deals and was a drug user. In such esteemed company, your record looks stellar.

Posted by: carryc | September 1, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I’m switching to McCain / Palin. They seem to have the needed change for the next 8 years, keep marriage between a man and a woman and save beautiful babies!! Go Palin Go.

Posted by: Mike | September 1, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

averagejoe…take a quick survey, and you will see that most of the vitriol is from Obama supporters, who will seize any opportunity to attack like a herd of hyenas. A perfect example of this is the indespicable and low down rumor about Trig…..they are not satisfied attacking Palin, so they go after an innocent baby?
Atrocious, you all ought to be ashamed of yourselves. Is this the “change” that Obama has instilled in you? Were you all good people once, and now your love of Obama has brought out your innermost evil? What give you the right to start false and horrific rumors about children?
You know that saying about not throwing stones? the hypocrisy of the Dems talking about family values:
A previous sitting president who committed adultery in the whitehouse.
A Dem candidate who had an affair and a child out of wedlock, while his wife has cancer.
And…..
The Dem Prez nominee with a history of drug use.
Family values? You have some nerve…..

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

The news here folks is McCain’s and Palin’s irresponsibility and lack of judgement, not Palin’s daugher.

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Palin has been governor of Alaska and is well qualified for managing a budget. Her results for the time she has been in public office are excellent. She has shown her ability to work within the party to get things done that benefit the people. The DNC candidates have no experience in managing a budget. The DNC presidential candidate is unqualified with little experience, and fewer results to show for his time in office than Palin. The best option is to choose a candidate who can get the job done, which is McCain/Palin 2008.

Posted by: Grace | September 1, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Roxanne–Is Barack and Michelle also pimping their daughters for political purposes. To me, a woman with family values and professional skills should be congratulated, not demeaned. Of course, Palin is more qualified for VP than Obama for President.
If Obama keeps taking his sort of high road, he going to drive off into the canyon. Goodbye, Obama, the hypocrite.

Posted by: Mary | September 1, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

“Democrat, Republican, or Independant, how can you call yourself an American when you ALL stoop to such low levels debate! Be ashamed! What are we teaching our children about the American way of life and democracy?”
Just expressing our opinions, averagejoe. If you think this is vitriolic, you really don’t get around much. I worry about the damage done to this country by Bush and his followers who tried to kill free speech and public dissent for the last 8 years. Remember the Dixie Chicks? They received death threats for criticizing Bush and the war in Iraq. They were practically run out of the country!! Worry about that, not this comment board.

Posted by: susan | September 1, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

Obama doesn’t want this touched because his own Mother was 18, single and pregnant and sleeping with a married Muslum man,

Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

dear Ron — if you are accusing Palin of being irresponsible because Bristol is pregnant, then you are also calling Obama’s grandmother irresponsible as her daughter got pregnant with Barack out of wedlock too. It is rather unfortunate that Obama is still getting advice from this “irresponsible” grandmother, isn’t it? shows a profound lack of judgement, according to you.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 1, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

The reason that Pollsters can’t get it right is that so many people are changing their votes. I’m a Republican… no wait I’m a Democrat….. The Republicans are popular this week…. yeah but my new girlfriend is a Democrat. Maybe I can be like Lou Dobbs, Fox has the hotter chicks….Nah Republican babes don’t put out. Give it a rest and get some fresh air. There are about 400 votes in b*u*m*f*u*c*k Ohio that are going to decide this election and there is nothing we can do about it.

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Its a non issue and has nothing to do with the vice presidency. Obama was also referring to the vicious smear campaign to try to libel a 17 year old girl and an infant with Down’s syndrown perpetuated by major main stream bloggers that support him. their actions were reprehensible. He said if anyone in his campaign was connected to it they would be fired. I hope he means that.

Posted by: s.b. | September 1, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Too bad about Bristol Palin’s pregnancy. Darn that Bill Clinton.

Posted by: Ben | September 1, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm

Go back to Alaska ansd stay there.you are a lie ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Posted by: indp voter | September 1, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Obama’s mother got pregnant before marriage at 18 and was 3 months pregnant when she got married to a muslim guy one who was married before.
Liberals never get it.
I know ABC will delete my blog
McCain’08

Posted by: tony | September 1, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

“She also manages the National Guard in Alaska, which is the first ballistic system on guard for the US for any missile attack on the US, and therefore is active 24 hours, the only one of it’s kind in the US. For that, she gets special security briefing.”
Posted by: decentAmerican | Sep 1, 2008 9:35:55 PM
=======================================
THIS IS A TOTAL LIE! Just like the rest of your points in your “posts!”
The missile defense system in Alaska has NOTHING TO DO with the National guard you liar!
That sysytem is ran by the US Air Force and is controlled entirely by the Federal Government and the Pentagon – I know this for a fact!!!
What do you think they are going to let that backwoods beauty queen Palin be responsible for controlling our national defense!!!
Are all of you Republicans just liars or what???
Palin isn’t qualified to do anything with a gun besides shoot deer, fox, bears and wolves from an AIRPLANE!!!
But that is another matter….

Posted by: Davis | September 1, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

It’s time for the Republican bloggers to stop criticizing the Obama supporters. You have taken the low road for the last several months and attacked every word that has come out of Barack or Michelle Obama’s mouth. Now you accuse us of being nasty. There can be no double standard. We want answers. Sarah Palin could possibly be the next VP of the US. If she was not properly vetted and has some unseemly skeletons in her closet we need to know. We also need to know about John McCain’s judgement. All everyone talked about is how the VP decision is the first real presidential decision. Well, I question how and why John McCain made his decision. So Republicans, get off your high horse.

Posted by: Mike M. | September 1, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

To Vickie, Obama never visited europe before last month.
Palin visited Europe before Obama.
Palin visited our troops in Germany unlike Obama.
I hate this election with every fiber in my body. The coverage sucks.
Obama is the guy who praised Hamas in 2004 but said he couldn’t say it publicly.
McCain has visited Europe hundreds of times. McCain has attended a nato security conference meeting every year.
Obama has never been to south america.

Posted by: Jason | September 1, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

So the daughter couldn’t have been pregnant BEFORE because she’s pregnant NOW, right?
And nobody will be allowed to see her NOW because it’s private family business, right?
How long before the “current” pregnancy ends in “miscarriage”?
Any bets?

Posted by: 08AMA ALL THE WAY! | September 1, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

decentAmerican who only made it to Junior High. The irresponsibility on McCain’s behalf is that she was not properly vetted and he should have known this was going to distract the campaign, and on Palin’s part for trying to cover it up, not from us but the people of Alaska whom she represents. I know that you are trying to bring Obama’s past into this, but his mother wasn’t running for Vice President of the United States….. big difference.

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

I am floored that so many take at face value McCain’s statement that he knew of this ahead of time and went ahead of with his pick ?
Folks, please … for the sake of the country begin to think for yourselves and read between the lines and stop believing everything you read in the media.
I ask you … if he did not know ahead of time, and this now comes out … does that at all in your opinion reflect on McCain’s ability to think and lead ?

Posted by: jp2 | September 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Jason…you are wrong. Obama has been to Europe several times in his life. He also was in Iraq before. He’s also been to Africa several times and actually lived in Indonesia. Stop the lies please.

Posted by: diane | September 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Joe Biden got 5 draft deferments and that gets no news coverage.
Palin’s daughter gets more coverage than Obama’s draft determents.
Obama took his kids to hear Wright give out awards to Farakkan.
Obama called a baby punishment.

Posted by: David | September 1, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Is PUMA anything like the COUGARS ?

Posted by: Ron | September 1, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Diane you are wrong.
Obama the first time he had ever been to western europe was this last trip.
Obama had never been to france, germany, spain, italy.
Look it up Obama had never been to western europe before this latest trip. He had a stopover in 2006 but this last trip was his first trip to western europe.
Obama has never been to brussels.
McCain has been to nato security conference meetings every year for decades in brussels.
Obama until 47 had never been to western europe his whole life.
Obama made fun of Clinton visiting 80 countries saying she was sipping tea.
Diane look it up Obama had never been to western europe before. It is a fact.

Posted by: To Diane | September 1, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

I fully agree that a candidate’s private family life should stay private, especially the children’s. As a parent and a grandparent of a loving Downs child my heart goes out to the Palin family. Sarah Palin’s politics on social issues, however, are open to discussion and this has made her vulnerable. Ms. Palin would if she could use her office to define each American family’s options about birth control education, pregnancy, choice, and would insert religious instruction into public schools. Yes, religious instruction. Creationism is a conservative religious belief based on a literal interpretation of the Bible. It has no basis in science, yet Ms. Palin wants her church’s dogma taught in every child’s science class. The Palin family’s decisions about deeply personal choices should private, theirs alone, not that of the Supreme Court, the Religious Right or the party in power. And so should yours.

Posted by: Box | September 1, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Diane look it up Obama had never been to western europe before this trip.
Amazing the guy at the top of the ticket has never been to western eurpoe.
McCain has been to europe fifty times and goes every year to nato conferences.
McCain is an american patriot ready to be CIC. Obama is a joke.

Posted by: To Diane | September 1, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

puma are sneakers of the 1980′s

Posted by: Omentum | September 1, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Roxanne,
I made it to Harvard and if you knew anything about people at Harvard you would know that there are actually students who are unwed mothers who got pregnant as teenagers. Liz Murray got into Harvard. Bill Gates dropped out of Harvard.
While you are praying at the Obama alter please light a candle for your sanity. You are obviously an Obamabot so bent on your man to win that you have failed to notice the ugly sour vomit worthy wretch you have become.

Posted by: Samantha | September 1, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Obama is free to take the high road – McStupid is scuttling his own ship.
Never interfere with an enemy when he is destroying himself.

Posted by: 08AMA ALL THE WAY! | September 1, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

The vice president has no constitutional role.
Did you know that Pelosi is third in line for the presidency.
The question is do you want McCain or Obama as CIC.
The Vice President doesn’t live at the white house.
The Vice President doesn’t travel with the president.
The Vice President has no role.
Who would you have rather had as president George H.W Bush or Dukakis.
The question is who do you want to be CIC McCain or Obama.

Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

*A public school teacher was arrested today at **John F. Kennedy
International Airport as he attempted to board a flight while in
possession of a ruler, a protractor, a set square, a slide rule, and a calculator.
At a morning press conference, the Attorney General said he believes the
man is a member of the notorious Al-gebra movement.
He did not identify the man,
who has been charged by the FBI
with carrying weapons of math instruction.
“Al-gebra is a problem for us,” the Attorney General said.
“They desire solutions by means and extremes,
and sometimes go off on
tangents in a search of absolute value.
They use secret code names like ‘x’ and ‘y’ and refer to themselves as ‘unknowns,’
but we have determined they belong to a common denominator
of the axis of medieval with coordinates in every country.
As the Greek philanderer Isosceles used to say,
‘There are 3 sides to every triangle.’”
When asked to comment on the arrest, Senator Obama said,
“If God had wanted us to have better Weapons of Math Instruction,
he would have given us more fingers and toes.”

Posted by: Steve | September 1, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

John McCain has demonstrated a haphazard style of judgement that he and his cronies have coined to be the MAVERICK style.
sorry no thanks mav.
no way
no how
no mccain
no maverick
no palin

Posted by: Omentum | September 1, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Uh, have any of you heard of Larry Sinclair and looked into all of the parishoners of Trinity church of christ who have unfortunately died since Obama announced? Hilliary’s not the only one with a body count! Not that McCain’s hands are clean with all of the men he and Kerry knowingly left behind to slave labor in Vietnam… (even STILL to this day American Free Press) These men are beyond despicable! Happy voting!

Posted by: argh! | September 1, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

if i want to see a maverick on my tv screen every week. i will look at the old western channel

Posted by: Omentum | September 1, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Obama has never been vetted.
This is a guy who lied about Rezko.
Obama bought land from Rezko when he was under federal investigation for influence peddling by patrick fitzgerald.
Obama had rezko build a fence and buy 1/6th of his lot which made the rest of the lot far less in value.
Obama then lied to the Washington Post saying he didn’t know about the investigation and no one could have known Rezko had any problems. Well it turned out later he did know Rezko was under federal investigation for influence peddling and called him. Rezko had been in the chicago papers for three years.
Obama hasn’t been vetted.
This is a guy who wrote a book about Wright.
Copies speeches from Duval Patrick.
Calls Father Pfleger a moral compass.
Hangs out with islamic supporters like Khalidi.
Obama tells a palestinian activist hamas supporter in 2004 to keep up the good work but he couldn’t talk about it because of the election.
Obama raised money for militant palestinian groups in the west bank.
Obama called ICE agents terrorists for arresting illegals.
Obama wants to let off the thugs of Jenna6 who beat that kid senseless.

Posted by: James | September 1, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

Often teenage pregnancy is the result of family discord or perhaps divorce or feeling neglected on some level. Girls reach out for love/attention and that may involve sex. While I support working parents at the same time being too busy with too much emphasis on careers that make their children not a priority perhaps is something to be aware/concerned about. It may be fair to say that both Palin parents with demanding careers and five children one of whom is special needs have to reconsider that the only priority that counts is being there to raise their kids. Something has to give sometimes and I can’t imagine how adding VP to this helps the family.

Posted by: jt1 | September 1, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

George has again shown his “True
Colors”………….So you’re wondering
what else you can dig up on Sarah Palin
and family…….
The Palin Family has more class than
you !!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Barbara Hilderson | September 1, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

I live in the Dallas are. The president of my school board represents more people than Ms. Palin represents in the entire state of Alaska. Personally, I don’t think I’d vote for the president of my school board for VP even though that person manages a very large budget and staff. As a state Senator from Illinois Mr. Obama represented more people that Ms. Palin represents in the entire state of Alaska. Ms. Palin was the mayor of a town that is the equivalent of a small farming town in Texas. If I want a pothole filled she would be my “go to” woman. However, she has no business running for vice president of the US. Is the problem that there AREN’T any women in the Republican party that are more qualified than Ms.Palin? The one exception I know of is Kay Hutchinson from Texas but I hear she didn’t want the job with McCain.

Posted by: Chris | September 1, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Obama bloggers will never take the high road – NEVER. And Obama knows it. After all, early in the election process, he help boot camp for bloggers to teach his followers how to produce slime.

Posted by: Aston | September 1, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Chris
So why isn’t your school board guy a VP candidate? Corrupted?

Posted by: Aston | September 1, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

I am voting for Ron Paul.

Posted by: jp2 | September 1, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Donald Young and Larry Bland were both openly gay African-American members of Obama’s Trinity UMC. Both were shot execution style within 30 days of each other. The bombshell may involve the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ—the same congregation that Obama has attended for the past 20 years. Two other young black men that attended the same church—Larry Bland and Nate Spencer—were also murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads—all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November 2007. All three were openly homosexual.
What links this story to Barack Obama is that, according to an acquaintance of Obama, Larry Sinclair, Obama is a closet bisexual with whom he had sexual and drug-related encounters in November 1999.
Further, Sinclair claims that Obama was friendly with at least two of these deceased parishioners, and that choir director Donald had contacted him shortly before being murdered from multiple gunshot wounds on December 23, 2007.
These killings are receiving a number of different reactions. Mike Parker, reporting for CBS in Chicago, wrote, “Activists fear gay African-Americans are being targeted for murder,” while Marc Loveless of the Coalition for Justice and Respect queries, “Are we under attack? Is this a serial killer?”
An even more sinister aspect of this case is being investigated. According to Sinclair in an affidavit to the Chicago Police Department, Donald Young had informed him that he and Barack Obama were “intimate” with each other.

Posted by: Samantha | September 1, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

HEY PALIN FANS!!
I just heard on Larry King Live that a McCain team is on their way to Alaska to “do further vetting on Palin!”
Isn’t it a little late for that McCain? Shouldn’t you have done that before you picked her?
I bet Romney is laughing at you right this second McDummy!!!
On CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS and just about every TV Network out there they are tearing Palin to shreds! All the Republicans are spinning their butt’s off, but their spin just sounds totally ridiculous!!!
No Republican will answer the point blank question of “IS PALIN READY TO TAKEOVER AS COMMANDER AND CHIEF IF SOMETHING HAPPENS TO McCAIN??”
You should all see them dancing around throwing out the Republican talking points, that she has more “executive experience than either Obama or Biden!
It is just a riot!!!
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 1, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Remember McCain’s cruel comment about Chelsea Clinton’s looks?
Obama is right…kids should be off limits.

Posted by: Beth | September 1, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

I’ve never seen such support from the “Dobson” crowd, dealing with the Palin’s daughter. With such support from the holiest of all, I can just see the thousands of evangelical young ladies going at it like a room full of bunnies!

Posted by: R. Oven | September 1, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Unlike Palin, Obama has never been under “investigation” for any wrongdoing. So you can try to smear him all you want but we know you are lying.

Posted by: Marion | September 1, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

hmmm,
If Ms. Palin is a member, or was a member, of the American Independence Party, which advocates secession from the US, then it’s highly unlikely that Ms. Palin will be able to obtain a security clearance from the Federal Government. Since I hold a security clearance I understand what will disqualify her and this is real high on the list. How can a person be VP without a security clearance?

Posted by: Chris | September 1, 2008, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

I think that Sarah Palin is an upfront, forthright, honest woman who shows incredible integrity. In this day and age when the media and society empasize sexuality, and sex outside marriage, it is not uncommon for a young unmarried woman to turn up pregnant. This sort of thing has been happening for centuries. I applaud the fact that Ms. Palin is supporting her daughter in her decision to have the baby. Many would have quietly aborted the child as inconvenient and, in that instance, who would ever know? The decision to have the baby shows character and a respect for life. All human life is created by God and is sacred. To be sure, there are consequences to sin, but the birth of a child is an inestimable good that can come out of an unexpected, or unplanned, pregnancy. I feel very positive about Sarah Palin and I think she will make an outstanding Vice President.

Posted by: Lloyd | September 1, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Aston,
Because, like Ms. Palin, that person is not in any way qualified for the VP position. Duh.

Posted by: Chrie E | September 1, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

How is this pregnancy in any way linkable to McCain or Palin’s conservative values? That isn’t even logical. They didn’t make her get pregnant. Also, it’s easy for Obama to appear to take the high road when he has all his surrogates and media shills running around attacking the Palin family and making very sexist remarks.

Posted by: Cory | September 1, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Given that Palin has more executive experience than Obama, it looks to me that the Democratic party FAILED its primary objection, and that’s putting up a candidate that is ready to be President from day #1. Epic. Fail.

Posted by: Jeremy | September 1, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

When you morons on the left push this issue, we’ll keep reminding you that Hussein’s mother gave birth to him when she was a teenager and married his father (who was then married to multiple women) just six months before he was born. When you bring up past situations just remember that your cult leader is not a saint; there is a load of dirt in his past to air for the American audience. You know we can imply in our ads that he’s a “secret muslim”; NY Times’ Paul Krugman says the dude recited the Islamic call to prayer in his office; ‘Allah Akhbar’, we can use code words to remind Americans that “did you know he’s black” (Hussein’s words not mine”), have you guys bought your tickets to see God damm America II by Rev Jerry Wright coming to a theater near you in October, what about the forthcoming Annenberg papers authored by Hussein and Ayers. You guys get the idea, just ask “Senator” Max Cleland or “President” John Kerry. So I say please keep pushing this storyline. Just understand that Sarah Palin is no HRC; we on the far right will not allow her go down like that. You think your golden boy Hussein is like the dapper don, you think you have this election figured out, wait till October, we are going to turn Hussein to a pariah. All this distractions would have been avoided if Hussein accepted the town hall debates suggested by our next American President; John S. McCain (did you notice I have no qualms using his middle initial) but he refused because he knows any debate on the issues will show he’s nothing but a flake and his followers being a bunch of zombies did not figure out then that there was something strange about him turning down this proposal; I mean a candidate who says he wants to “change” America but he’s unwilling to discuss the specifics of this “change” by putting forth his ideas for the citizenry to evaluate, a politician who practices the “new politics” runs away from such a novel idea, you’d think his moronic followers would at least wake up, but I guess they are far too emotionally invested in this fraud; (there’s going to be an increase in mental illness in the US after this guy losses by a landslide in November). You morons should get ready for another four years of a Republican President in the White House, Just remember you can fill stadia with thousands of drug induced morons chanting “Yes we can”; only one man/woman goes into the polling both to pull the lever, do you morons see majority of the people in right of center USA pulling the lever for Barrack Hussein Obama? something to ponder, gone till November.

Posted by: julian | September 1, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

Chrie E
Your guy still isn’t a VP nominee and Palin is. I guess she’s at least more qualified than him.

Posted by: Aston | September 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

I don’t get why “The Dailey Kos” finds this to be such a big issue against the Repubs.
I’m an Evangelical and I find this to be a non-story. Kids make mistakes. Shock! Why make a bigger mistake with an abortion and pretend that it never happened? The kids are doing the right thing and flyover country will applaud even if the big cities don’t. Tough on ya, you don’t decide the elections.
Go ahead and have your kids have abortions and just forgetaboutit!

Posted by: linda | September 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Life happens… it’s those who can courageously take the bull head on and endure that I respect. We get hit by life … and isn’t it wonderful to have supportive family to help us through all of life’s woes. Courage and endurance, regardless of the judgment put on one from society, should be hugged. When you take problems head on and not hide, you can look at yourself everyday… and never have to lie. How wonderful that is to live in peace with yourself.
I appreciate that the Palin family is taking these life tests head on.
McCain/Palin ’08…
And I appreciate the integrity McCain has in regards to him knowing this family issue,and is still not afraid of the problems it may cause. Knowing she’s the only champion that has taken on gov’t corruption, energy issues, etc.
Sadly, we as a society has become so cruel and blinded to how fathers can be a good parent. When there are problems w/a family, the first person to be judged is the mother… not realizing that problems come to all race, age, gender, socioeconomics background.

Posted by: KChicago | September 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Governor Palin and family are not putting on airs ala Obama. They are a regular family with the same every day problems we all face, including having an underaged daughter becoming pregnant.
My niece bacame pregnant at 17 and gave birth to a very sick baby. The challenges were tremendous. My brother, wife and family became closer and supported their daughter and baby, and paid for all baby expenses. They were never on welfare and my niece graduated from college. When the time was right, after the husband-to-be finished his military service they married and they now have three beautiful kids.
My brother and wife were outstanding parents but they could not be with their daughter in that time of blessing when love, passion and nature is not looking at age.
The Palins will support their daughter and baby just as much, and they will not be on welfare. They will see the child as a gift.

Posted by: Mrs. Phoenix | September 1, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

ron paul speaking live at the rally for the republic
http://www.mogulus.com/republicmedia

Posted by: jp2 | September 1, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

How much you wanna bet that McCain saw her and thought “herm, a solid republican conservative, with pioneer spirit, a rule breaker, a first!!” and figured that there was no point in vetting her because she was just from some podunk town in Alaska…..
Oh my lordy. A Secessionist!!!!
I’m sure most the republican establishment is too much in shock to figure out what to do next. I mean….there’s been people with little things like old DUIs or second marriages/messy first divorce things.
But this….Holy moly a secessionist.

Posted by: Chicka | September 1, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Obama has spoken – if his daughters get pregnant, he’d take the easy way out and tell his daughters to abort their problem.

Posted by: Aston | September 1, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

You (as a parent) can do every thing for your children.
You can give them the best education, a good loving home and any thing they want (all they have to do is ask).
How they will turn up, is up to G-D him self (you pray and hope).
You do your best and hope for the best nothing is guaranteed.
Every thing is from heaven (health, wealth etc..) except fear of heaven.
You can’t blame a parent (who’s at least trying) for the way his/her kids come out, especially when it come to religion.

Posted by: chaim | September 1, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Why are you people not commenting on Obama’s use of cocaine and what it can do to the brain cells? Using cocaine is worse than getting pregnant; at least she is bring a life into this world, perhaps another Einstein or Churchill, you never know what a baby will turn out to be.
Don’t be such hypocrits; how many of you had sex in your teens or committed adultry? Look in the mirror, folks.

Posted by: Michael McCoy | September 1, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

There are an awful lot of strawmen arguments in that post (quoted).

Posted by: DaveS | September 1, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Ahhh…the “new” politics promised by the Obamatrons is in full swing.
Strange. They bear a strange resemblance to some of the most despicable gutter politics this nation has ever seen, but hey – who’s watching?
Remember when Barack Obama sold cocaine? Has he ever been held accountable for that? What coke would Jesus have sold, Obamatrons?

Posted by: Good Lt | September 1, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

FROM ANOTHER ABC STORY BY JT….
Earlier this year, Palin sent a video message to the Alaskan Independence Party (AIP) for its annual convention, where AIP vice chair George Clark told the small crowd that Palin “was an AIP member before she got the job as a mayor of a small town.
And while McCain’s motto — as seen in a new TV ad — is “Country First,” the AIP’s motto is the exact opposite — “Alaska First — Alaska Always.”
Lynette Clark, the chairman of the AIP, tells ABC News that Palin and her husband Todd were members in 1994, even attending the 1994 statewide convention in Wasilla. Clark was AIP secretary at the time. Palin is pretty well sympathetic to her former membership in the AIP.”
Lynette Clark says that Palin is “a fine individual. She’s forthright and she puts Alaska first.”
She is not a fan of McCain.
“So I can’t understand why in God’s name she has aligned herself with a candidate who opposes the development of our Independent Alaskan Republic and Alaska’s resource wealth,” Clark says.
Man, PALIN I LOVE YOU!! You are the gift that just keeps on GIVING to Obama!!

Posted by: Davis | September 1, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

the real problem with some on the left is she is engaged to be married to the father and is keeping the child (I guess she dosnt mind being punished with a child }.

Posted by: mojack | September 1, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

I feel your pain Michael McCoy, grasping for something anything. Good luck to you.

Posted by: edd | September 1, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Aston,
My guy? You assume much Aston. I’m not thrilled with the nominees of either party. I was just responding to comments about Palin’s “executive experience”.
I thought that this stream was about Palin’s daughter. Personally I think we should leave the candidate’s kids out of the debate. This is really a private matter. Shame on the Republican party for holding her up on the national stage as a shining example of family values. She is a 17-year-old girl. EVERYONE, Republicans and democrats alike, should leave her alone. We have plenty of vitriol to spew at eachother’s candidates without involving children.

Posted by: Chrie E | September 1, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

it raises a lot of questions about mccains judgment and palins too
clearly we havent been told the whole truth yet, who is the father, what did mccain know, what else are they waiting to tell us
there are so many holes in this account
that media will worry at it till the truth comes out
way they playing it this will be the death of a thousand cuts
she been sold to us as a rightwing supermom – instead we getting jerry springer drama
is this what we want in the whitehouse
is this what we consider presidential stature
perhaps this will make repubs reconsider that abstinence only no sex education holier than thou attitude but i doubt it
bottomline is her mother should have thought twice about sacrificing her daughters privacy on the altar of ambition
shame that little girl will be put thru this – her mama should have just said no

Posted by: arthur flowers | September 1, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

D A M N A L L O F Y O U!!!!!
LEAVE THE 17 YEAR OLD DAUGHTER
A L O N E…..HAVE YOU NO SHAME OR COMPASSION OR DECENCY????????

Posted by: mother of 5 daughters | September 1, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

I’ve never committed adultery – speak for yourself.
Palin was unvetted – that’s clear. Great choice, my friend. Now we’re supposed to do that in the next two months because he was too reckless to do it. And she should’ve said ‘no thanks’ and knocked some sense into him so that he’d choose someone like Romney, Huckabee, Paul, Whitman, Hutchison, or my second grade teacher who would be much better.
I might not care for Obama, but I’m not blaming him for this dumb pick.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 1, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

@mother of 5 daughters -
AMEN!

Posted by: LeeLee07 | September 1, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Good Lt ~ I wonder if Obama bought his coke from George Bush as he to was a coke user. LOL.
I love the idea that Palin is a secessionist is something that would have me consider voting for McCain. Of course the Republicans are all hitting the bottle trying to just escape this mess.

Posted by: Freeman | September 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

You folks are just unbelievable. Attack Palin all you want, she’s the candidate. But the kids? They didn’t bring this on themselves, the vultures on the left are dragging them into this. And enjoying every perverted minute of it.
Sick. But fully expected.

Posted by: John | September 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

If the situation were reversed and Obama was the father of a pregnant teenager, there would be a media circus indeed, but few would be crying hypocrisy. The online speculation will continue about Palin because some unanswered questions behind rumors need to be put to rest.

Posted by: kat | September 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Michael McCoy,
Because we are not interested in your Obama lies anymore.. We are much more interested in how Palin was a POT HEAD!
The American people just find all of Palins “trailer trash stories” much more interesting and juicy than all of that old news you Republicans try to push!!!
Don’t you get it? McDummy and his new beauty queen Sarah Palin are going to be the laughing stock of every office water cooler in America tomorrow morning!!!!
Can you Republicans say President Obama??

Posted by: Davis | September 1, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Hey ABC – Why did you report on Monday that Bristol was pregnant *AGAIN*???
What a sleazebag job of journalism.

Posted by: palin4prez | September 1, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

While they are vetting Palin, I hope they remember to also vet that guy who is running for president.
You know him, what’s his name??
Oh yeah, Barack Obama.
PUMA!

Posted by: LeeLee07 | September 1, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

You folks are just unbelievable. Attack Palin all you want, she’s the candidate. But the kids? They didn’t bring this on themselves, the vultures on the left are dragging them into this. And enjoying every perverted minute of it.
Sick. But fully expected.
Posted by: John | Sep 1, 2008 11:04:48 PM
=======================================
John,
Where are you coming from you Republican troll? I haven’t seen anyone “attack” Palins kids here or anywhere else!
Who needs to do that anyway, when Palin gives us so, so much to go after!!!
She is the gift that just keeps on giving!!!!! Ha, ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 1, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

Bill in NC, obviously you are not thinking with a head at all

Posted by: Sandy | September 1, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

“The Palins will support their daughter and baby just as much, and they will not be on welfare”
Not on welfare? What the hell does that mean? Good Baby, bad baby?
Spoken like a (Christian Republican), or in other words an (oxymoron).

Posted by: Thinking | September 1, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

How is it possible that the people I can’t stand the most: Lieberman, Ferraro, Hillary supporters are behind the GOP candidate? That the GOP nominee ignores picking someone knowledgeable in the economy when poll after poll says that the economy is what everybody cares about.
Someone please point me to where all the Republicans have gone as I seem to have missed the memo.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 1, 2008, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

LeeLee07,
Sorry there, but that isn’t going to happen…
McDummy is going to spend every waking minute until election day defending his dumb pick of Palin for VP!!!
No time to attack Obama anymore!!!!
Obama has got McKeating Five on the run!! And McDummy has no one to blame besides himself!!!
Obama/Biden ’08!!!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 1, 2008, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

so Chris, You would vote for Obama who has little experience? He is a freshman senator who hasn’t done anything except run for President. In our IL legislature, Obama voted PRESENT 120 times. I figure he did this so he wouldn’t be pigeanholed on issues by having voted for them. When asked about 6 of votes, he even said he hit the wrong voting button. Are you real sure you want him in the White House? He might hit the wrong button there and start a war.

Posted by: Sandy | September 1, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

sandy: you illustrate the point well. the best attack McCain had was the inexperience thing. and he blows it! this thing is gonna make me blow an aneurysm for sure…

Posted by: 1percenter | September 1, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Davis, Obama did cocaine. So why call Palin a pot head? Hypocrite

Posted by: Sandy | September 1, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Palin is a liar. Her daughter is not pregnant. They are trying to cover up. Now i have come to believe the story that that baby is not her baby but her daughter’s. I can bet my life that very soon we will hear that she had a miscarriage.

Posted by: vuzous | September 1, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Davis -
Most Republicans and Hillary Supporters are rallying behind Palin. The only ones picking her apart are Obama Supporters and they were not going to vote for her anyway. :D
Umm, maybe no one has told you, but 3 of the Keating 5 were Democrats and were found guilty; John McCain was cleared, so it really is a non-issue.
What else do you have????
PUMA! McCain/Palin 2008 in lieu of Hillary Rodham Clinton

Posted by: LeeLee07 | September 1, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

Investigate this ABC:
August 22, 2008
Bill & Barack’s Excellent Adventure
By Thomas Lifson
William Ayers, unrepentant terrorist and education professor, is once again being tied to Barack Obama in the public mind. Controversy builds over the withholding of the archives of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, an expensive failed school reform effort headed by Obama and effectively run by Ayers, held by the library of the University of Illinois Chicago. Researchers who have gained access to a few documents recording the history of the project have found strong evidence of a very important working relationship between the two men on the project, Obama’s sole claim to executive experience.
Oddly enough, even though the project produced no measurable improvement in student performance according to its own final report, educators and administrators — participants and grantees of the CAC — were reported by outside monitors to be often “ebullient” about the activities. For insiders, it was an excellent adventure. For the pupils stuck in the failing public schools of Chicago, an ongoing, unrelieved disaster.
Obama and his campaign long have gone out of their way to downplay, in fact distort, the long and evidently deep relationship between Ayers and Obama. In the Philadelphia Democratic debate last April, George Stephanopoulos asked Obama about his relationship with Ayers, and the candidate responded:
“This is a guy who lives in my neighborhood, who’s a professor of English in Chicago, who I know and who I have not received some official endorsement from. He’s not somebody who I exchange ideas from on a regular basis.
“And the notion that somehow as a consequence of me knowing somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago when I was 8 years old, somehow reflects on me and my values, doesn’t make much sense, George. [....]
“So this kind of game, in which anybody who I know, regardless of how flimsy the relationship is, is somehow — somehow their ideas could be attributed to me — I think the American people are smarter than that. They’re not going to suggest somehow that that is reflective of my views, because it obviously isn’t.”
Almost two months earlier, the “neighbor” talking point campaign manager David Axelrod introduced the notion that Obama and Ayers were mostly just neighbors, telling The Politico’s Ben Smith,
“Bill Ayers lives in his neighborhood. Their kids attend the same school,” he said. “They’re certainly friendly, they know each other, as anyone whose kids go to school together.”
Ayers and his wife are in their sixties, while the Obamas are in their mid-forties. Ayers’ children are all adults, while Obama’s children are currently 10 and 7. Axelrod’s prevarication is telling, bespeaking confidence that nobody in the media will bother to dispute an obvious falsehood.
“Flimsy” turns out to be a completely misleading word when it comes to characterizing the Obama-Ayers relationship.
Notwithstanding the campaign’s efforts to direct attention away from Ayers, a 527 group, American Issues Project, has just released the following ad tying Obama to Ayers, and says it is spending 2.8 million on television airtime in key states.
Despite the legally questionable embargo of the CAC archives, most of its tax returns and official evaluations of the CAC have already been made public. In the hands of intrepid bloggers such as Steve Diamond, Tom Maguire and Dan Riehl, there is already proof of Obama’s extensive involvement with Ayers over the course of his chairmanship, and an emerging picture of Obama’s indecisiveness and absence when serious problems needed leadership.
Barack Obama joined the CAC shortly after William Ayers and Anne C. Hallett received news that their letter of November 8, 1994 submitting a grant proposal to The Annenberg Challenge had been approved. They were to get as much as $49 million from Annenberg, plus tens of millions more dollars from other foundations. Obama’s involvement predates by months the actual incorporation of the CAC and his appointment as founding chairman of the board. He came on board almost as soon as the proposal was approved.
How on earth did a relatively unknown associate at a politically-connected but small Chicago law firm come to be entrusted with the heady task of handing out tens of millions of dollars of other people’s money?
Keep in mind that Obama was at this point in his career very undistinguished considering his pedigree. It would be a kind understatement to say he had underperformed his academic resume. Three years out of Harvard Law and the Law Review Presidency, here is a short list of some of the things Obama had not done:
Clerked for a US Supreme Court Justice (or any Federal Judge);
worked in an important legal position at any level of serious responsibility;
written a law review article or note or published anything of legal substance.
As of 1995 Obama may have had the most professionally empty resume of any President of the Harvard Law Review three years gone from “The Law School.”
And yet Ayers gave him a gig that would enable him to hand out large amounts of money to many people in Chicago, who could be expected to be grateful, once Obama ran for office — as he was to do later that very year, in an event held at the home of Ayers and Dohrn.
Quite clearly, Obama was already well-enough known and trusted by Ayers to be offered the sensitive, prestigious and highly visible post of chairman of this important new undertaking. So we must ask, when did Obama and Ayers actually first get to know one another? And how did they come to trust one another?
One possible connection between Ayers and Obama was Sidley Austin, the prestigious Chicago law firm where Obama had a summer job after his first year at Harvard Law School, and where he met his future wife Michelle, assigned to him as a mentor. Also working at Sidley Austin was Bernadine Dohrn, wife of William Ayers, and a fellow Weather Underground terrorist. Given the shared “progressive” politics of the three, they probably knew one another and associated together at a firm known as a white shoe corporate practice.
Or Obama might have met Ayers even earlier, during his stint as a community organizer on the South Side of Chicago, in fact. Ayers was a well-known and very active figure in left wing Chicago politics, and might have encountered the young, articulate, Ivy League educated rookie black radical Obama, working in a Saul Alinksy spinoff.
We soon will know much more about the period of collaboration between Obama and Ayers following the start of the CAC. Even if the archives continue to be withheld from public scrutiny, the cat is out of the bag with the documents available to all. The formidable analytical engine of bloggers trading insights and new data is warming up.
But the period prior to 1995, the time when Bill and Barack, the terrorist and the presidential aspirant, got to know one another and build the relationship of trust, is one excellent adventure likely to remain obscure.

Posted by: reaganfan | September 1, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

Sandy, I didn’t say that at all. You assume I’m a Democrat because I pointed out an obvious flaw in the GOP ticket? Neither ticket is particularly awe inspiring is it? Obama lacks experience but has leadership qualities – like Kennedy in 1960. McCain was involved in the Keating S & L scandal in the 1980s. If that’s an example of his leadership then I’ll pass. Plus, if the truth be told, he’s a real jerk, according to my company’s lobbyists who have regular contact with him.

Posted by: Chris | September 1, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

who cares whose baby is whose? the only purpose to bring this stuff up is to try and get her to decline the nomination. she should’ve done it already, but i doubt she backs out now. i used to think the only way McCain could lose was if he chose Lieberman – i now realize i was wrong.

Posted by: 1percenter | September 1, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

box, no one can put religious instructions in our schools because of our constitution? So what are you blathering about/

Posted by: Sandy | September 1, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Am in the Medical field and I almost believed it because the older, the higher the tendencies of having a baby with Downs syndrome but so many things were not checking out. How could her baby water had broken and she still gave a speech and travelled twelve hours to Alaska to have her baby? Why couldn’t she have had that baby in Texas? Why did she go to a remote hospital to have her baby in Alaska? One year after, the doctor was made the doctor of the year. Mccain still think this election is a joke. HE IS THE JOKE. Another thing no reasonable mother with a baby with Down syndrome will seriously think of neglecting that child to run for an office. All the mothers I know with such babies are either not working or working lesser hours. Down syndrome is not a joke. I suggest you google it, then you will understand. The baby needs all the love and attention of the mother to be able to grasp and understand things in life. Thats why I called her a NUT this morning, only to come back and read this story. MCCAIN IS REALLY A JOKE. There was definitely no vetting.

Posted by: vuzous | September 1, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

For a group of people who have been shouting “CHANGE” at the top of their lungs for 17 months and preaching about woman’s rights, equal pay, breaking glass ceilings and that teen pregnancy needs more attention for far longer; I am shocked and appalled at the unelievably negative sentiments.
I thought that Liberals were supposed to be fair minded ones about these things and Conservates were supposed to be the crotchety old spinsters. Silly me.

Posted by: Frank | September 1, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Have you no decency?
The Palins have handled this with incredible class and LOVE.
I’m impressed.

Posted by: Frederick Michael | September 1, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Really and truly why is it the Evangelicals and so called conservatives won’t stand and condemn this pregnancy. This is setting a horrible example for our youth. Stand and say this is not acceptable. We do not condone this type of behavior. Why is it that so called conservatives are so fake and biased. They think its ok for innocent children to die in Iraq, but say they are pro life. God is not pleased.

Posted by: Mike T | September 1, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

To Posted by: bhrandon | Sep 1, 2008 9:24:01 PM
OMG, you are relying on Mitchell and Stephanopolis for your news?! LOL, no wonder you are ill-informed.

Posted by: Gary | September 1, 2008, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

The bombshell may involve the murder of Donald Young, a 47-year-old choir master at former Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ—the same congregation that Obama has attended for the past 20 years. Two other young black men that attended the same church—Larry Bland and Nate Spencer—were also murdered execution style with bullets to the backs of their heads—all within 40 days of each other, beginning in November 2007. All three were openly homosexual.
What links this story to Barack Obama is that, according to an acquaintance of Obama, Larry Sinclair, Obama is a closet bisexual with whom he had sexual and drug-related encounters in November 1999.
Further, Sinclair claims that Obama was friendly with at least two of these deceased parishioners, and that choir director Donald had contacted him shortly before being murdered from multiple gunshot wounds on December 23, 2007.
These killings are receiving a number of different reactions. Mike Parker, reporting for CBS in Chicago, wrote, “Activists fear gay African-Americans are being targeted for murder,” while Marc Loveless of the Coalition for Justice and Respect queries, “Are we under attack? Is this a serial killer?”
An even more sinister aspect of this case is being investigated. According to Sinclair in an affidavit to the Chicago Police Department, Donald Young had informed him that he and Barack Obama were “intimate” with each other.

Posted by: Samantha | September 1, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Save babies and save our Freedom America. Vote McCain and Palin. Keep marriage between man and woman!! We do not need to change those like barack osama said he would. Go Palin Go!!

Posted by: Big Dog | September 1, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Davis: your obsessive love for Obama has got you even believing your own lies, your are just babbling! You know nothing about our defense system!
“Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks. It’s on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units.
As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her exposure to classified material may rival even Biden’s.
She’s also the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security’s counterterrorism plans.
Palin is privy to military and intelligence secrets that are vital to the entire country’s defense. Given Alaska’s proximity to Russia, she may have security clearances we don’t even know about.
According to the Washington Post, she first met with McCain in February, but nobody ever found out. This is a woman used to keeping secrets.
She can be entrusted with our national security, because she already is. ”
—savagepolitics
You can look that up, it’s all there.
As for this vetting; it’s both shocking and disgusting that in a matter of 3 days since Palin was annouced as VP, she has been driven through the mud by crazy Obama supporters, and there are demands to be vetted. Yet, Obama has been on the campaign for almost two years, and he STILL has not been fully vetted. There are numerous aspects of his past that we know NOTHING about. Why is this? Is it sexism, that the woman candidate needs to be vetted, but the much more inexperienced male gets a free pass?
Before you go making demands about vetting Palin; make sure your Obama is vetted. Why are his entire Illinois senate records unavailable? Why did they bar the release of the annerberg challenge records? Why are is the campaign trying to hard to block Kurtz’s discussion of those files?
Trust: the GOP is on top of it all. October surprise my friends, October surprise.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 1, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Mike T — do you honestly think that evengelitcals are going to side with Obama, who is not only proabortion, but also pro live birth abortion?
Palin is truly in touch with what affects Americans. This is a woman who knows what every family may have to go through. McCain made a spectacular choice, God bless President and Vice President mcCain and Palin.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 1, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

If Sarah Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy is a private issue that has no relevance to the Presidential race, than how can McCain be criticized for reaching that same conclusion? His critics agree that it’s irrelevant, but then they criticize him for not properly vetting Palin, meaning that he should have disqualified her on the grounds that her daughter was pregnant. They want it both ways: The pregnancy is a non-issue, but McCain making it a non-issue is an issue. Folks on the Left make no sense.

Posted by: Ted in Japan | September 1, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Sarah Palin water did not break in Dallas as falsely reported. She was having seepage and returned to Anchorage to her own doctor as I would have done. I seeped for two months before my second baby was born. The baby was normal when born near the calculated date.
Get your facts straight before demeaning a mother, please.
Also, I have had friends in their 20′s have babies with birth defects. The things happen–only God knows why.

Posted by: Mai | September 1, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

What implies bad judgement here on McCain’s part? The fact that Palin has a 17 yr old daughter who is pregnant?
What, should she bow out because of it?
Would we expect that from a male candidate? That her husband had a DUI
20 yrs ago when he was 22? Ted Kennedy drank like a fish throughout most of his Senate career and no one expected him to leave the Senate. In fact if we want to talk dysfunctional family the let’s talk the Kennedys who supposedly just passed the torch to Obama. Infidelity, alcoholism, bribes, kids with drug addictions, rape allegations, car accidents while under the influence resulting in a young women’s death and so on. I’m an Independent, not a Republican but I have always been disgusted with the hypocrisy of the right but I am really disheartened with the hypocrisy of the left. I expected better from Democrats. I also can’t believe the hoopla around her experience given Obama’s slim resume of spending almost his entire first term in the US Senate either doing exploratory committees around a Presidential bid and the rest campaigning for President. People keep mentioning his foreign relations sub-committee. Until just recently he never held one meeting in his stewardship of that committe. He has an abysmal record of even showing up to vote. Where was he on Kyle Lieberman? I don’t know, he gave two different excuses for missing that vote. He was a State Senator while Palin has been a Governor. He was community organizing while she sat on a City Council and was a Mayor. The only difference is Palin didn’t hire Axelrod to strategize and implement events and press to make his candidate with the slim resume look Presidential. Biden was a political choice on Obama’s part to compensate for his lack of foreign policy experience and to attract blue collar voters. Palin clearly was a political choice to not attract Clinton women per se because most of them will not support an anti-choice candidate but rather to attract blue collar and rural voters regardless of gender, to solidify his conservative base and as these sexist attacks on Palin keep coming in from the left, I have no doubt she can pick up some of those Clinton supporters because of it. I question Obama’s judgement about leaving an opening for McCain to take advantage of by not putting Clinton on the ticket. Obviously McCain’s choice threw the Obama camp for a loop and clearly they don’t know how to play it yet and are throwing the whole kitchen sink. The McCain camp says they knew about the pregnancy, the young woman is 5 months pregnant so I have no basis to believe they are lying. It’s not like the young women wouldn’t be showing soon. I give McCain alot more credit for dismissing this pregnancy, something that is occurring in households all over this Country, while the Democrats are acting like Palin should be thrown off the bus. And experience? If any of you recall, Obama’s first choice and who he really wanted on his ticket before he made a political decision and picked Biden, was Tim Kaine from Virginia. Tim Kaine was on the City Council and Mayor of Richmond, Virgina for a combined total of 7 years. He was Lt. Governor and has only been Governor for the same length of time as Palin. If Obama had put him on the ticket would you Obama supporters be screaming about inexperience? Palin was a Commissioner
on Energy, one of our biggest issues facing this Country, on top of her almost identical experience with Tim Kaine. Would Kaine not be a problem because he’s your candidate’s pick? or is it because he’s male? There are young,gifted, up and coming politicians within both the Democrats and Republicans- Palin, Jindal and Obama being three of them. The Democrats opted to put one of their bright and shining stars on the top of the ticket and now McCain has opted to put one on the bottom of the ticket. I have never been so disappointed in the Democratic party and the Democrats as I have this election.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 1, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

decentAmerican:
“Is it sexism, that the woman candidate needs to be vetted, but the much more inexperienced male gets a free pass? ”
No, it’s racism. The media fears being accused of playing the race card. Palin’s background puts Obama’s to shame, in fact is is logical to question his patriotism, but you won’t see the media do it.

Posted by: Billw | September 2, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

If McCain wanted to shake up the base….well, congratulations. He passes on Romney? Pawlenty? For Palin?? There either was no vetting or a disregard of what little there was…. Either way, McCain looks a foolish egomaniac. He got it right the first phrase in his introduction, “she’s just what I need”. Yeah, you and no one else. Thanks, McCain.

Posted by: MidwestIowa | September 2, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Wasnt Obama’s mother around the same age when she had him? And his parents werent married, so what does that make him?

Posted by: JULIE | September 2, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

we know the girl is 17 ,, what is the father is 18 or older … what does the law say about this ? spin all you want republicans … this is a mess …
look up the law you ding bats.

Posted by: question | September 2, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

“For a group of people who have been shouting “CHANGE”
op cit
Obama would need to CHANGE his drawers if McCain took him up in a fighter plane.

Posted by: Billw | September 2, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

A word to all Democrats out there. Those who are firmly on the left will stay there and those firmly on the right will stay there and nothing either party does will change that …. NOTHING.
This is all about the 10% voters that have not yet made up their mind. Name calling from right or left, will not persuade them.
What the Democrats need to be concerned about is the fact that since the day Sarah palin was introduced a NEWLY fired up conservative base made 4 million dollars in on-line contributions to the The McCain campaign. As of that Friday there wont be any voter turnout problem for the GOP anymore.
GAME ON !!!

Posted by: cmoore | September 2, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

All the children should be left completely out of this. It’s like Obama said, imagine how the other person feels thats being picked on. I feel terrible for her daughter, the whole world knows you’re five months pregnant, and now I hear she is going to marry the father. I really hope she is not being Forced to marry this young father for political or religious reasons. People BACK off This!!!
McCain should not have offer her the job knowing this information, imagine the pressure this young woman feels, this is not right. I am an Obama supporters and I hope all of his supports follow his lead, I certainly will.

Posted by: Paula | September 2, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Obama was a bastard child.
He learned “family values” from a loose woman, his mother, and continues to get advice from one of the “smartest” people he knows, his grandmother, who was irresponsible in letter her daughter get pregnant. How can we trust the judgement of Obama, who was raised in this setting?
How does that sound, Obama supporters? Pretty disgusting? b/c that is EXACTLY what you are doing to Palin, right now. You all are appalling, and it is no surprise that Obama is the only one who can instill this type of evil in you.

Posted by: liberati | September 2, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

some of us vote our values and not party. the more of us that do the more we can make these politicians dance. You get the government you deserve.
Neither of the major parties has anything to offer.

Posted by: skippy | September 2, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

1percenter She’s a Governor and last I heard they deal with State budgets.
I’m from MN and I know our Governor is dealing consistently with economic issues so I would imagine it’s not all that different in Alaska. When did Obama have executive experience and deal solely with a budget? He’s not dealing with his campaign budget, where would he have the time? Obama was a State Senator and Palin has been a Governor and last I heard the Governor’s run the show in the State.
They have the veto power. What State are you from that your Governor has nothing to do with your State economy?
And don’t you think the State economy is impacted by what happens on a National level? Do you think Palin is so stupid she’s not aware of that? I think you should watch the CNBC interview with her and then tell me she doesn’t deal with the economy or some of the issues facing us on a National level.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

No this doesn’t particularly bother me.
However saying you’re a racial healer and a uniter and hanging out in the Trinity Church for 20 years total contradicts your stance.
THAT bothers me. This does not.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

Obama’s supposed first choice for his VP candidate was Tim Kaine from Virginia. Obama opted though to make a political choice and bring on Biden to compensate for his lack of foreign policy experience and to attract those blue collar voters that Clinton overwhelmingly was winning over him.
Gee, Tim Kaine was on the City Council and Mayor of Richmond for a combination of 7 years, was Lt. Governor and has been the Governor of Virginia as long as Palin has in Alaska. I doubt you Obama supporters would have been screaming about his inexperience. Would that be because it’s your own candidate’s choice? or because he’s
male? Obama, given his slim resume and minimal foreign policy experience, probably couldn’t afford to bring on someone like Kaine. McCain can. If Obama can have 300 foreign policy advisors I think McCain can round up a couple hundred for Palin.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

How about the presidential candidate himself hanging out with the fringe leftwing Bill Ayers? Where is the concern over that?
Palin’s daughter is pregnant? That’s a shame. But Obama hanging out with Rezko, Wright and Ayers??
That’s just downright SCARY.

Posted by: Obama Has No Judgment | September 2, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Tibbes had earlier fired the governor’s legislative liaison John Bitney, reportedly as a consequence of Bitney dating the estranged wife of a friend of Todd Palin, the Governor’s husband. Andrew Halcro calls Todd Palin, who also played a role in the Monegan firing, the “Shadow Governor.”

Posted by: Thinking | September 2, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

paula i agree-certainly hope the upcoming marriage of palen’s daughter is not for political reasons.

Posted by: mae g | September 2, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

If Sarah Palin needed to prove that she was the actual mother of her newest child, why not JUST produce her medical records of the delivery Why expose your own daughter’s teen pregnancy as an explanation. It wasn’t necessary and makes one wonder what else we do’t know about this woman – such as she was a member of a political groupin 1990′s that urged Alaska to secede from the Union. Can McCain truly think that the about is a recommendation for the individual who is only a heartbeat away from the Presidency?

Posted by: Ana | September 2, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Who cares? In the end it will make her more likeable. Now millions who may not have watched her speech Wed. will tune in out of curiousity and that’s a GREAT thing. She will be awesome.
And women will flock to her. And vote for her.
And we’ll win.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Jo:
“hanging out in the Trinity Church for 20 years total contradicts your stance.”
“Obama has been long-time pals with anti-Americans (Wright and Ayers), but now says he is a great American. His gullible supporters go by what he says, not what he does.

Posted by: Billw | September 2, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Just one point in Palin’s defense. She is actually not against the use of birth control as a lifetime member of Feminists for Life. She is not against the teaching of birth control in sex-ed class.
Quote from Anchorage Daily-Hattip Weekly Standard-
Anchorage Daily News:
In 2002, when she was running for lieutenant governor, Palin sent an e-mail to the anti-abortion Alaska Right to Life Board saying she was as “pro-life as any candidate can be” and has “adamantly supported our cause since I first understood, as a child, the atrocity of abortion.”
Palin said last month that no woman should have to choose between her career, education and her child. She is pro-contraception and said she’s a member of a pro-woman but anti-abortion group called Feminists for Life.
“I believe in the strength and the power of women, and the potential of every human life,” she said.
End Quote

Posted by: Matt S. | September 2, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

We have a vice presidential candidate whom it appears was not even remotely fully vetted before being picked.
She believes the Pledge of Allegiance was written by the Founding Fathers.
She is vehemently against explicit sex-ed, and coincidentally has a pregnant teen daughter.
She has had to hire private counsel to defend her in a special investigation over whether she fired Alaska’s public safety commissioner after he refused to fire her ex-brother in law.
As mayor of Wasilla, she fired department heads who disagreed with her, including the police chief.
While running for governor, she supported the infamous “Bridge to Nowhere”, telling residents of Ketchikan that she didn’t think they were nowhere. When introduced as McCain’s choice, she flip-flopped and said she told Congress, “No, thanks,” about the bridge.
And oh, yes, she was a member of an Alaskan separatist party.
These are facts and stories that existed before last week, much as any staunch GOP member would love to dump this on Democratic supporters. The only thing that would exceed the Republicans’ shrill disclaimer that there is no truth to anything negative about Governor Palin is the self-righteous denunciation that would be thundering from the right if these stories were about a Democrat.
I don’t delight in this partisan BS bickering. And the only person who seems to be interested in changing this, and working TOGETHER, is Senator Obama. I hope this country wakes up.
Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: Kim P. | September 2, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Ana, uh I think her daughter’s pregnancy would have been pretty darn “exposed” in the next few months anyway.
Good luck with that “fringe” thing. Seeing how Obama is far leftwing fringe himself, with terrorist buddies.
Get a clue. Lol.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

“Palin’s daughter is pregnant? That’s a shame. But Obama hanging out with Rezko, Wright and Ayers?? That’s just downright SCARY.”
But he has a base support of blacks, die-hard democrats, and youngsters who think he’s cool. Speaks for itself.

Posted by: Billw | September 2, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

To be pregnant at 17 is quite a burden. This young lady gets the additional weight of the entire nation weighing in on whether or not it’s the nation’s business.
Can you imagine the guilt she must feel towards her mother at the moment? If the media can bury John F Kennedy’s trysts with Marilyn Monroe for decades, surely this story can wait.

Posted by: Republican guy | September 2, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Kim,
This country has awakened. That’s why even after the most fawning coverage in all of presidential history, Obama is basically tied with McCain – even after 40 million watched his speech.
As far as Palin, she decided the bridge was costing too much, she wanted that trooper fired because he was violent and tasered his own son, among other things, and I think she’s so darn good she scares the hell out of you because you know women will love her.
She WAS vetted. It’s Obama who wasn’ vetted by YOU people.
But nice try. Run along and have a cookie.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Obama is a self-serving gasbag, woth questionable patriotism.

Posted by: Billw | September 2, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Ahhh Your all Such wonderful people, From such wonderful homes.
Your lives are perfect, everyone in your family is perfect, You live a pefect life. That mush be so Awesome.
The perfect people so full of Hate.
Where did all this hate come from?
Did you people always have so much hate and comtempt in your hearts? Did you always Attack people so evil and hateful?
Seriously, It is horribly sad.
I have seen people attack in the name of party, I have seen people attack others in the same party.
Does Obama generate This hate, or just ask that you project it.
Seems I have never seen Americans hating Americans so bad until he started. It is Frightful. Can he actually get so many to spew so much hate?
Adults should really not be acting like this. It is not healthy for You or the country.
I suggest you take some time and find out what the motivation is for such hate and attacks. Then ask yourself When you started doing it, what has motivated you and realize it is not a good thing.
I hope to God you are able to stop it or control it. It is not good for you, the people around you or the country.
I sure do not want kids growing up thinking it is ok.

Posted by: seah | September 2, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I am an African American woman and if I were in Gov. Palin’s shoes, I would not stand a chance nor would I receive any sympathy and that is very sad to me.

Posted by: Ms. T | September 2, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

It took just a few days to dig up stuff on Palin, yet the mainstream media took a WHOLE YEAR (after some of the primary elections) to find out about Obama’s 20 year MENTOR and PASTOR who is a jew hating, anti american, hate spewing, black separatist.
Oh and that was only after Sean Hannity shamed them into reporting it.
Must be nice to have the entire mainstream media covering your ass for you.
And yet he still can’t reach that 50% mark. Speaks volumes.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Thats right dumbocrats, take the high road to 4 more years of republican management. Because a vote for Hussein is unamerican.
McDaddyCain 08

Posted by: Dumb de-moo-crats | September 2, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Seah, you think there is hate in here for Obama?
LOL. I guess you’ve had your eyes and ears closed for the last 8 years of the most vile, hatefest for President Bush.
Get a clue.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

I’d never vote for anyone from the dirty Chicago political machine, much less vote one in for president. That’s the most corrupt bunch that exist in this country. No thanks Obama.

Posted by: Beth | September 2, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Mike T-
I agree. I am so tired of the Evangelicals caring only about the abortion issue. Let me make it perfectly clear that I abhor abortion, think that it is murder of an innocent soul, and should only be allowed in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother.
But to think that Palin is the poster child for conservatism because she is pro-life is just too much.
The record shows she lied about the “bridge to nowhere”. She was for it before she was against it.
She eloped with her husband and if accounts are correct, she had her firstborn only 7.5 months later.
I used to think the trooper thing was no issue, but now I am not sure.
She clearly showed flawed judgement in flying from Texas back to Alaska after her water had broken- especially when she was already a riskier pregnancy.
I do not hold her accountable for her daughter’s behavior, other than to say it looks like daughter is following in her footsteps. The apple usually doesn’t fall far from the tree.
But my anger is at McCain for not doing a proper vetting and then trying to pass her off as a conservative poster child to try to appease conservatives like me. My anger is at the rabid Evangelicals who forget that the first sin is the pre-marital sex and should be fighting that instead of or at least in addtion to focusing on abortion. My anger is at those same Evangelicals and their support of that joke Huckabee who split the conservative vote allowing McCain in in the first place and then fighting to keep Romney out as VP.
I will not vote for Obama and his record of socialism and infanticide. But I am having an ever harder time agreeing to vote for McCain.

Posted by: Political Dean | September 2, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Mike T-
I agree. I am so tired of the Evangelicals caring only about the abortion issue. Let me make it perfectly clear that I abhor abortion, think that it is murder of an innocent soul, and should only be allowed in cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother.
But to think that Palin is the poster child for conservatism because she is pro-life is just too much.
The record shows she lied about the “bridge to nowhere”. She was for it before she was against it.
She eloped with her husband and if accounts are correct, she had her firstborn only 7.5 months later.
I used to think the trooper thing was no issue, but now I am not sure.
She clearly showed flawed judgement in flying from Texas back to Alaska after her water had broken- especially when she was already a riskier pregnancy.
I do not hold her accountable for her daughter’s behavior, other than to say it looks like daughter is following in her footsteps. The apple usually doesn’t fall far from the tree.
But my anger is at McCain for not doing a proper vetting and then trying to pass her off as a conservative poster child to try to appease conservatives like me. My anger is at the rabid Evangelicals who forget that the first sin is the pre-marital sex and should be fighting that instead of or at least in addtion to focusing on abortion. My anger is at those same Evangelicals and their support of that joke Huckabee who split the conservative vote allowing McCain in in the first place and then fighting to keep Romney out as VP.
I will not vote for Obama and his record of socialism and infanticide. But I am having an ever harder time agreeing to vote for McCain.

Posted by: Political Dean | September 2, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Paula Obama very eloquently pointed out today that this young woman’s pregnancy has no relevence in regards to Palin’s abilities as Governor or as a potential VP. Why should McCain not have considered her as a VP choice because of this? Would we expect a man to drop out if this situation occurred in his family? The McCain claims Palin told them of this pregnancy almost immediately and there is absolutely nothing other then those on the left’s speculation and rumor-mongering to believe otherwise. I actually give McCain credit for not disqualifying this woman because of it. If he had, and that had come out then all the Obama supporters would have all of a sudden found their feminist roots and cried sexism. I have no doubt this family has taken into account the media scrutiny they could be under and I would think it would be remiss if the McCain camp hadn’t pointed out them the harshness of the media and asked them if they could handle it. Obviously they felt they could, but I question whether Palin really understood the venom of the National press and what Clinton endured throughout the primaries. I don’t know if anyone could be prepared for the type of trash and venom and hate that is being directed at this young girl and Palin and her family from Obama supporters and those on the left. Clinton, whether you like her or hate her, was unique in that she had spent almost her entire adult life in the political arena and had been on the end of attacks from the right for years going so far as accusing her of being involved in Foster’s death, her having an affair with Foster, her being a lesbian and on and on. When Clinton said she could handle the right wing she could and that prepared her for the attacks from Obama supporters and the left. There is really no woman other then Clinton, other then perhaps Ferraro, who could possibly know what it is to be in this position. I can honestly say I have never been so disgusted and disheartened with the Democrats then I have this election.
This is a family going through a situation families throughout this Country are going through everyday and we don’t expect those fathers and mothers to just quit their jobs or expect that they be fired, so why would we expect that of McCain or Palin?

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

They’re running scared of Sarah Palin. No wonder they’re making up all these smears. Their Greek God had no convention bounce, or if he did it lasted all of two seconds. Wow. Think of all that money wasted.
Victory isn’t far away. :)

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Political Dean,
Pull the lever for McCain anyway. Sarah Palin is a fiscal conservative and she fights corruption. That’s why they want this investigation into her anyway, because she fought the bad guys and they’re pissed.
Just imagine a president who has buddies like Bill Ayers and Rev Wright. It’s enough to make you not sleep at night.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Name ONE thing the Republican party has done for MIDDLE CLASS America in the past eight years. ONE!
Any working class American thatbacks the GOP (Gas, Oil , and Pipeline Party) has to an idiot with no sense of history.
But say the word “patriotism”, put an American flag behind you, then shout “terrorism”, and some morons will beleive ANYTHING!

Posted by: Love My Country , Hate My Government | September 2, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Republicans need to get off their high horse before Miss Congeniality thinks its a moose and shoots it…..

Posted by: Sidney | September 2, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

You know, I can’t believe people are focusing on this young woman’s pregnancy when there was just an article about it being reported on the Israeli airwaves that Biden told representatives from Israel that they need to get used to a nuclear Iran. Now if indeed that is true, there is real reason to give a VP candidate the boot. Israel is not going to let Iran go nuclear and there has been speculation that Israel would do an aerial attack on Iran before the end of this year if it looks like Obama will or does get in because they don’t trust him to deal with Israel. So good going Joe.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

I hope Governor Palin takes a page right out of Chelsa Clinton’s playbook. Just tell the press, the bloggers, the gossips, the women haters, the self-righteous liberals and conservatives –’That it’s none of their business!’ Oh, and one more thing, tell the Obama campaign to stop peddling the crap like they did to destroy Hillary’s campaign.

Posted by: mpwynn | September 2, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Obama may SAY that candidates’ families are off limits, but he still allows his mouthpieces, the vile DailyKos and the ludicrously stupid Huffington Post to carry on insulting the Palins which they continue to do, even as we speak.

Posted by: bobbiewick | September 2, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

No Way, No How, No McCain – Hillary’s message to America!

Posted by: Linda | September 2, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Since Obama is himself the product of an unwanted pregnancy when his mom was 17, I appreciate his words today. And if HE had been vetted before Feb., the Wright, Ayers, Rezko, Pfleger news would have resulted in a Hillary win.
STILL FOR McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Jo’s posts are great! I agree with every word.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

I’m not an American so I can’t vote. I’m an Australian and really don’t know much about politics but looking and hearing both candidates if I had to choose someone of good character and speaking from the heart it would be Obama

Posted by: christine | September 2, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Debra, so true. Obama will lose. Hillary would have won in November. And all because the media didn’t do their job of vetting Obama till after the primaries started.
Excellent.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

alpaig52 ah spoken like a true republican, in the end resort to fear.

Posted by: jp2 | September 2, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Don’t be fooled by Obama seeming to “take the high road”…
When you know the media and your minions behind the scenes will do your dirty work for you, then you know you can safely stand back and pretend to be shocked and saddened that this vile stuff is going on.
Puhleeeze.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

jp2, yes it’s terrible to use fear to win elections.
Oh and by the way, I hear that if we don’t vote democrats the earth will be destroyed by GLOBAL WARMING!!!
LOL.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

Lets vet Obama on:
Reverend Jeremy Wright
Toney Rezko
William Ayers
Rashid Khalidi
Emil Jones
Father Michael Pfleger
Emil Jones
Anneneburg Challenge

Posted by: anotherview | September 2, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Christine, since you’re from Australia, you don’t hear about Obama and his disturbing associations.
He hangs with terrorists and vile people like Rev. Wright. He is not the person portrayed on TV.
And don’t worry he’ll lose. Trust me, this country knows what it’s doing. It’s best not to make up your mind from what you see on TV.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

and dont forget Donald Young and Larry Bland,

Posted by: Samantha | September 2, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

nice try. I support Ron Paul …just to help you narrow down the swipes.

Posted by: jp2 | September 2, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

anotherview,
But if we did that kind of vetting, our boy Obama would never win.
Signed,
The Mainstream Media

Posted by: The media | September 2, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

How about that Rev. Wright quoted today about if BO becomes Pres, he will be the first President to have a black woman sleep legally in the White House.
I was thrilled to hear him speak again, as I thought the Obama campaign had given him a one way ticked to Africa.
STILL FOR McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Ron Paul? Oh yes, there were some protests on the news. Some vile people spitting and cursing at police and passersby and smashing windows.
Oh yeah, and they were wearing Ron Paul buttons.
Nice people. Lol.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

“Love my country”
It is posts like yours that make it easier to lose my disdain for McCain.
What did the GOP do for the middle class?
How about the Bush tax cuts? You are completely misguided if you think they did not help the middle class. First, he lowered the lowest rate from 15% to 10%. Everyone who pays taxes says 5% on that first bracket. He came up with doing away with the marriage penalty. He came up with the child tax credit.
If you think those benefit the wealthy (when they clearly phase out for higher incomes), you are nuts. In fact, if you truly researched, you would fine that the truly wealthy are actually paying a higher share of taxes under Bush.
You can whine all you want, but unemployment has been lower during the 8 years of Bush than under 8 years of Clinton- and under Bush we weathered the 911 recession pretty well.
No, I won’t vote for Obama and his lies. But it doesn’t mean I am going to sing McCain’s praises, either. (And I own only one house that is worth 1/11th what Obama’s house is worth, so I am indeed middle class).

Posted by: Political Dean | September 2, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Debra, AMEN.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

LOL. jo …

Posted by: jp2 | September 2, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am

How is this for judgment?
“Hi I’m Obama and I’m the #1 most liberal senator in the U.S. And so to diversy my ticket a little, I think I’ll pick Biden, the 3rd most liberal guy in the senate.”
I think that was a brilliant move. I think that will help me win. Lol.

Posted by: Jo | September 2, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am

I do pray for Gov. Palin and her family and worry that she is not used to the brutal slams from every direction that Hillary has sustained for years. It won’t be easy, as they are all over Alaska now looking for things to smear her with….the Dem slime. I really don’t think main stream media knows Obama himself is the product of an unwanted pregnancy when his mom was 17. She married AN ALREADY MARRIED Obama Sr. four or five months into her pregnancy. He had a wife and child back in Kenya…..WHY DOESN’T MEDIA COVER THAT?
McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

PALIN=Harriet Miers
Palin/pregnant daughter underage out of wedlock-Cheney/gay pregnant daughter not married (to man)
McCain is doing all of the worst things–we saw from the Bush years!
And Palin is a amalgamation of all of those bad choices in one!

Posted by: joefansler | September 2, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

We don’t need to put any moral judgment regarding this pregnancy scandal.
However, I’m just wondering this woman, who has a 4 month Down Syndrome baby, teenage pregnant daughter have to handle this complicated work of High Role next to 72 years old man with history of cancer?
Maccain should have picked someone else.
There are many wonderful women in republican party.

Posted by: zen | September 2, 2008, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Once again we witness the double standard that the Conservatives practice when it comes to their sins.
I could care less about this girl’s pregnancy. I do care about her hypocritical mother, though. Someone who runs around preaching about “putting family first” and then foists her vulnerable, pregnant teenager onto the national stage so she can pursue her own narcissistic dreams is a scumbag of a human being.
We’ve had ENOUGH Conservative scumbags in the White House for several lifetimes—thank you very much! And we CAN SAY ANYTHING WE WANT ABOUT IT. I don’t see any reason to let the Right ride on this one!!

Posted by: RobinL | September 2, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

I must say jo I do like Palin;s secessionist views. There is lots to like about her, unfortunately she can not change McCain;s views on foreign policy or monetary policy … but I like what she has had to say the times I ahave seen her speak and the things I have read about her. But … the top of the ticket is wrong … in fact crazy imo … so i will be voting my values and not party .
ron paul for the long haul …
come on jo… join me in voting your values and not choosing the lesser of two evils ..

Posted by: JP2 | September 2, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

SO WHAT ABOUT THAT BRIDGE TO NOWHERE ANYWAY??
McCain has bragged that Palin opposed the famous “Bridge to Nowhere,” only to learn now that Palin supported the project and even told residents of Ketchikan that they weren’t “nowhere” to her.
After the national outcry, she decided to spend the funds allocated to the bridge for something else. Actually, maybe it’s more fair to say that coincident with the national outcry, she changed her mind. The story shows her political judgment, but it is not a reformer’s credential…
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901
Likewise, though she did cut property taxes as mayor of Wassila, she raised the sales tax, making her hardly a tax cutter…
The Republicans and McCain can Hide behind this “minor hurricane” (now downgraded to a Tropical Storm and missing New Orleans) anymore…
So as the wind and rain goes away, the “Palin VP Pick Storm” is only going to grow! It will grow into the biggest disaster for McCain and the Republicans in the last 50 years!!!!
Bye, bye Mr. McCain!!!!

Posted by: Davis | September 2, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

I know that if this was a male VP candidates daughter, this would’t be as newsworthy…on either side. God forbid, if Chelsea had got pregnant, would therefor Hillary not be qualified to run for President? This is all non-issue for Sarah Palin to be Vice President.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

There’s only one reason Barack is taking the high road and that is attacking Sarah Palin and her daughter is creating a lot of blowback for his campaign. Kids don’t use good judgment and make mistakes that’s why we call them children. liberal vitriol is doing a lot of good for the GOP and the public exposure of the hate party is heartwarming. So, keep it up, please.

Posted by: Dribble | September 2, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

I wonder if Palin’s daughter was allowed to consider giving her baby up for adoption or having an abortion. Just a thought. See how abstinence education works?

Posted by: CD | September 2, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Well, you can count me as one person whose not buying the latest spin in the least. Immediately after Palin was chosen as McCain’s running-mate, the bloggers were all over the story that Sarah Palin’s fifth child, Trig, was in fact the child of her 17 year-old daughter, Bristol.
The history of that story goes something like this: Palin announces her fifth pregnancy to a SHOCKED media and STAFF just a little more than a month before she actually gives birth. The media points out that the Governor, who was supposedly more than seven month pregnant, looked not at all pregnant. Published pictures taken around Super Tuesday show a very thin Palin. In addition, it was reported that classmates of daughter, Bristol, say she was removed from school for a period of four to five months prior to and including the time of Trig’s birth, supposedly because she was suffering from a long bout of mono.
If that’s not coincidence enough, today comes the revelation that, well, 17 year-old Bristol is in fact now pregnant – and coincidentally five months pregnant. So we’re supposed to believe that she got pregnant at roughly the exact same time that her mother was giving birth to her brother, Trig (conveniently squashing the possibility that Trig is Bristol’s), while she was out of school convalescing from a long bout of mono.
So why do I now get the feeling that Bristol will have an unfortunate miscarriage either just prior to or after the election? And since teen girls often deliver prematurely – as early as 7-1/2 months – that would give enough slack in the normal nine month pregnancy period to allow for Bristol to have actually gotten pregnant again after giving birth to Trig.
Think that can’t happen? My own sister gave birth to two babies in just under 20 months, while 17 and 19. Oh, and similar to Palin’s daughter, she was taken out of school by my parents – the story line being that she had transferred to a private school out of the area – a ruse no one believed, including both friends and teachers who confronted me at school about whether or not she had given birth.

Posted by: TJ | September 2, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Sure, Palin is one of ordinary American Parents who have teen age pregnant daughters.
The problem is that she is now VP candidate for America.
She has so many things to take care right now in family… the 4 month Down Syndrome baby, the vulnerable pregnanat daughter. Even if she is great governor of Alaska, in this situation to say yes to VP offer shows her values…
Power first, Family last.

Posted by: zen | September 2, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

JP2-
Sorry, but the true crazies are the Ron Paul fanatics.
I was a delegate at the WA State GOP convention and the stuff they tried to push through on platform was crazy.
Plus, Ron Paul is one of the biggest hypocrites around. He loads up bills with earmarks and then votes against them (knowing they will pass anyway) so that his district gets the cash and then he has the nerve to go around saying he is conservative and fights pork.
And he, like Obama, is, was, and will be forever wrong on the issue of national security.

Posted by: Political Dean | September 2, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Palin is a Eva Peron in Alaska version.
Good for the 3rd world,
Thanks, but no thanks for America.

Posted by: zen | September 2, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

So now having a pregnant teenage daughter disqualifies someone for public office? Get real.

Posted by: SurferDoc | September 2, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am

TJ…..IDIOT……PALIN’S BABY IS FOUR MONTHS OLD…..BRISTOL IS FIVE MONTHS PREGNANT….YOU ARE A COMPLETE FOOL BY STILL TRYING TO SPREAD SLIME FOR THE SLIME PARTY.
McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Two weeks ago I was a Democrat. Today I’m an Independent. I am so tired of the extreme liberal and mean-spirited left of our party. Someone on this blog actually called that little girl a slut. No political objective is worth what liberals are willing to do to get it.

Posted by: hawkster | September 2, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

I agree with Obama in principle, however just looking at the Rep supporters on this page, critizing Obama
for his hands off stance and attacking his mother & grandmother. It shows the Republicans double standard and hypocrisy. This holier than thou attitude is exactly what is wrong with the Republican party and shows how poor McCain thought process and judgement is. I guess the Republicans will be celebrating the coming wedding, Shotgun Style!

Posted by: Elitist | September 2, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

This is a perfect example of the business as usual in Washington! Just as Bush did not get all the facts before invading Iraq, McCain did not get all the facts before selecting Palin. You should all be pissed off…that man has the nerve to make her the potential VP and possible future President which is a total disregard for the people of this country. To leave us in the hands of a woman who was on the committee to make Alaska Independent of the US, who has zilch experience, and cannot even be there for her children. The McCain supporters should be ashamed of him. Continuing to make a circus out of our country…we have been laughed at by the rest of the world for 8 years and 8 is ENOUGH!

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Who vetted Obama?
Ayers?
Wright?
Farrakhan?
or just his grandma.

Posted by: sully | September 2, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

“Two weeks ago I was a Democrat. Today I’m an Independent. I am so tired of the extreme liberal and mean-spirited left of our party.”
I know how you feel. Those left-wing nuts need to leave the party and join the socialist or communist parties were they belong.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Political Dean I know what you mean when it comes to his voting record on ear marks … I bothers me as well. I see it as you do … he is not perfect no doubt … I know how he rationalizes it …
imo there should be term limits … these lifer politicians bother me …
As far a his national security stance … well that is something that we will disagree on …
next to feed at teh tax payer troff imo will be big pharma … as the only thing that will be covered in the Obama national health care plan will be what big pharma has lobbied for. So take the blue pill for disease A, and then follow that up with 3 other pills to offset the side affects …
Expansionary preemptive fear based wars vs free trade only help the industrial military complex … yes Political Dean you and I will never see I to eye on national security either.
Ron Paul … freedom gone wild. give us an inch and we will take a mile. We own our bodies … not the government. what is so crazy about taht ?

Posted by: jp2 | September 2, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Who’s running for office the mother or the daughter? Last I checked it was the mother. Why would the choices of the daughter/child have any bearing on the decisions the mother/parent would have to make as a V.P.? Do decisions your child/brother/sister make have an bearing on decisions you need to make at your job? Leave the child out of the discussion.
What, you can’t find anything else to use that would “prove” this individual is not “worthy” to be a Vice President?

Posted by: JeffJ | September 2, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Sully-
the media (who can’t get him on anything that will stick)
Nice try though…you are all scared now. For reassurance though, you can keep tuned into Fox News – they are doing a good job trying to keep you all pumped up by saying this was still a good choice. They want to make sure the minority makes it to the polls in November.
The rest of us know better…”We’ll take it from here…” Obama 08!

Posted by: kim | September 2, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

“You should all be pissed off…that man has the nerve to make her the potential VP and possible future President which is a total disregard for the people of this country.”
I’d rather have those 2 in the Whitehouse than the likes of Barry and his mentor Wright. Not to mention his whacked out domestic terrorist friend, Ayers.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

Elitist: you accusing the repubs of hypocrisy? Are you serious? Look at the viciousness by the Obama supporters in this thread. And the target? A child. That’s right, all the attack is toward a child.
I would like to think that at some point in your lives, you were good people, but somehow your obsession with Obama, has drawn out the sheer worst in people. At what other time in your life would you have justified yourself as OK to attack a child?
attack McCain, Atttack Palin, but attacking her children is beyond indespicable. As shocked as I am, it comes as no surprise from Obama supporters. And if this is the world that Obama wants for us, how can you possibly say that he is not pure evil?

Posted by: liberati | September 2, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

“I would like to think that at some point in your lives, you were good people, but somehow your obsession with Obama, has drawn out the sheer worst in people. At what other time in your life would you have justified yourself as OK to attack a child? ”
A few months ago they were attacking Hillary. So I guess they are misogynists.They have a love affair going with Barry.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

TO Elitist:
Don’t worry…these boards a packed with scared Republicans freaking out that the only idiot they could come up with is John McCain. They are unable to sleep tonight.
Just ignore them…

Posted by: hahaha | September 2, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

OK McCain,
Hurricane is over, it only turned out to be a Category 1 and missed New Orleans, so can we get back to that Republican convention of yours??
How long are you going to hide behind this puny tropical storm anyway?
We the American People WANT to see the complete and utter FAILURE of you and your RNC Convention, in all of its Glory!!!
We can’t wait to hear the “POWER” of your acceptance speech on Thursday! We want YOU TO TELL US like Mr. Obama did, why you would make a better president than he would!!!
Say are you going to have a LIME GREEN background behind you again! I really think that one was a winner, do it again!!
We are also all waiting to have your new VP speak to us as well, to assure us that she can step into your shoes at a moments notice and be president…
But can you please tell her not to give that same “hockey mom” speech again, you know the one with the centerpoint being that LIE about the “Bridge to Nowhere” OK? We have had enough of that LIE!
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3125537020080901
That speech is getting a little boring, we want to hear something POWERFUL from your new VP, to show us she is not just a “lightweight” beauty queen!!!
Thanks John!!

Posted by: Davis | September 2, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Well said Davis…I love you!

Posted by: kim | September 2, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

“Say are you going to have a LIME GREEN background behind you again! I really think that one was a winner, do it again!!”
I guess it can’t compare to a faux-greek temple and a free concert.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

This is what SMART Republicans are saying:
I’ve voted a straight Republican ticket every year of my life since 1975, when I first came of voting age, but I was stunned and horrified by McCain’s choice of Palin. I simply cannot even consider voting for McCain after this choice, which speaks loudly of his own selfishness and fundamental frivolousness.
So I was shocked when I turned to the conservative blogs looking for others who shared my dismay and found a celebration going on. They really honestly believe that Palin’s “inexperience” and Obama’s “inexperience” are equivalent. I have had no luck at all in the past 24 hours trying to explain that Obama is quite obviously an impressive man (with whom I disagree on almost every major issue) with extraordinary qualities of organization, discipline and leadership. I see nothing in Palin’s record to suggest that she has any such qualities.
He is a man who has spent his adult life thinking serious thoughts about serious issues and having serious conversations about them with other serious, well-informed people; while Palin quite as clearly has done none of those things. He was the president of the Harvard Law Review; she was the point guard on her high school basketball team.
He has surrounded himself in his campaign with world-class people (with whom, again, I disagree on almost every issue); and though I am doubtless an elitist and snob for saying so, I doubt that she has even met a half-dozen world-class people in her lifetime.
While Obama might do a hundred things as President that I believe are bad for the country, I am confident that he would surround himself with experienced, informed, competent advisors and that he would make no world-destroying blunders. I cannot say the same about Palin and, in view of what this choice reveals about McCain’s character and judgment, I cannot say the same of him either.
The Palin pick says much more about McCain than it does about Palin (all it says about her is that she didn’t have the good sense to turn it down). What it says about McCain is that he is more interested in politics than policy, more interested in campaigning than governing, tactical when he should be strategic, and reckless when he should be considered.
He is as big a gamble as president as Palin is as vice-president. This decision was about gut, about politics, about cynicism, and about vanity. It’s Bushism metastasized.

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Frankly, the photograph of Bristol carrying “her brother” looks a great deal like a mom cradling her breast-fed infant. It is tender and maternal. But if Palin lied about this fifth child, what does this make her as a VP to be a 72-year-old heartbeat away from the most powerful office in the world, with our national security and military and economy to manage?

Posted by: lin | September 2, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

MACK: At least Obama can fill a stadium.

Posted by: Corrine | September 2, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

“While Obama might do a hundred things as President that I believe are bad for the country, I am confident that he would surround himself with experienced, informed, competent advisors and that he would make no world-destroying blunders.
Yes look no further than his mentor of 20 years, Wright. Wasn’t he on his advisory committee until he was forced to throw him under the bus. He can always look to Ayers for domestic advice, since he has a lot of experience in that area.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Mack my dear, you are proving yourself to be quite desperate now. Cute though.

Posted by: kim | September 2, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

“MACK: At least Obama can fill a stadium.”
Offer them a concert and they will come.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Your lack of uneducated sarcasm makes you look a little frightened. Obama will win and you obviously know it.

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

“Mack my dear, you are proving yourself to be quite desperate now. Cute though.”
It seems to me that desperation is attacking a VP candidate’s kid. Why the fear of Palin? If she is such a bad pick then it should be a cakewalk. You should be celebrating.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am

“Your lack of uneducated sarcasm makes you look a little frightened.”
I’ll take that as a compliment coming from a self described elitist like yourself.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

Obama knows how to fill a stadium with rock concerts….while the rest of us grown ups not fascinated with celebrity pop stars, are focused on voting McCain/Palin in Nov.
Hey does anybody know if the good Rev. Wright, Ayers, Rezko and Pfleger had front row seats at the Grecian Gore Fest last Thursday?
Obama’s big Biden/Convention bump?
When WILL this guy get to double digits, like Kerry did?

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

We are celebrating…guess you missed that! Oh yeah, and looks like Hannah’s on it’s way…must be a sign from that God you all love to throw into politics! Will you ever have your convention? Oh that’s right…who cares?
Goodnight Mack! All this celebrating has worn me out! I’m saving the rest for whatever new scandal comes up with McCain & Palin tomorrow!
Night, night!

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

“Hey does anybody know if the good Rev. Wright, Ayers, Rezko and Pfleger had front row seats at the Grecian Gore Fest last Thursday?”
Don’t know about the rest of them, although I believe that his good friend and real estate agent, Rezko is in prison.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

Kim Do your homework. Palin has just as much experience as Tim Kaine who was rumored to be Obama’s first choice as VP until he decided to make a clearly political decision and bring Biden on.
Kaine was on the City Council and Mayor of Richmond for a culmination of 7 years between those two positions, was Lt. Governor and has been Governor of Virginia for as long as Palin has Alaska. While Obama was community organizing Palin was on the City Council and Mayor. Obama has State Senate experience while Palin has been a Governor with Executive experience.
In fact I can’t recall a recent President with just State representative experience but we’ve certainly had our share of Governors-Carter, Reagan, Clinton and George W. In fact the only recent President who came in with foreign policy experience was Bush Sr. While Palin has been Governor for as long as Kaine has and Obama has been US Senator, Obama used his first year to do exploratory committees around a Presidential bid and the rest of his first term has been campaigning for Prez. He has an abysmal record for even showing up to vote, he didn’t do one hearing until just very recently in his stewardship on the sub-committee of foreign relations. He totally squandered any opportunites afforded him to acquire the depth of knowledge, perspective and experience in foreign policy. Where do you think Biden and McCain got their foreign policy experience? Obama just skipped over it though and decided he didn’t need it and ran for Prez. Obama has 300 foreign policy advisors and I think McCain can find Palin a couple hundred. Obama has Axelrod whose spent the past 18 months strategizing and implementing events and working the press to convince this guy with minimal experience and accomplishments is Presidential material. Maybe Palin should hire Axelrod, if he could convince you about Obama I’m sure he could Palin. What a choice this year though. An inexperienced candidate at the top of the Democratic ticket or one at the bottom of the Republican ticket.
I’ve watched Palin’s interviews and she’s sharp and I have no doubt she’ll be a quick study and unlike Obama she has executive experience.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

“Goodnight Mack!”
Goodnight Kim. Back at it tomorrow.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

“Operation Distraction” is in full swing with this VP choice! Instead of talking about the positions of both the GOP contenders, we are media is focusing on the “tabloid storyline”. Oh how I wish it is November 5 right now! Then, these stories will be pasttime.

Posted by: Dave | September 2, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Mack…don’t let the slime here on these blogs get to you. Americans get it right in the booth on Nov. 4th…I have faith the top of the ticket is ALWAYS WHAT VOTERS ARE VOTING FOR. And with a no one knew him last year, inexperienced, friends with criminals, racists and Anti Americans, kind of Dem candidate like BO, there is no way. If every young and delusional and black voter can make it happen then we’re in trouble. I would have voted for a Colin or Condi but never B. Hussein. And the making history by voting for him is null and void as I will be voting McCAIN/PALIN.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

“I’ve watched Palin’s interviews and she’s sharp and I have no doubt she’ll be a quick study and unlike Obama she has executive experience.”
I feel the same way. She’s sharp and a hands on, hardworker. No soaring rhetoric, although she will get the job done.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Darn, I’m trying to go to bed….
alpaig52: The bottom line is Kaine was NOT picked. Regardless, judgment AGAIN shown by Obama. Gees you guys are truly scared!
All the references to Ayers, Wright, whoever else you want to throw out there is just desperation. You aqree being laughed at by the MAJORITY of people.
Look, we haqd to put up with your dumb pick TWICE. Deal with it. It’s our turn!

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Darn, I’m trying to go to bed….
alpaig52: The bottom line is Kaine was NOT picked. Regardless, judgment AGAIN shown by Obama. Gees you guys are truly scared!
All the references to Ayers, Wright, whoever else you want to throw out there is just desperation. You aqree being laughed at by the MAJORITY of people.
Look, we haqd to put up with your dumb pick TWICE. Deal with it. It’s our turn!

Posted by: Kim | September 2, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

Mack I agree. The Obama camp was obviously caught off guard and are worried about Palin otherwise we wouldn’t be seeing the kitchen sink thrown at her and her family right now.
Everyone thinks McCain put Palin on the ticket to woo Clinton supporters but Palin’s conservative positions on social issues won’t bring alot of them over. What she can do though is appeal to those blue collar and rural voters that Hillary was overwhelmingly winning and that Biden was brought on to appeal to. She also solidifys McCain’s GOP conservative base and after reading all the trash on these blogs coming from Obama supporters I’m sure a few Clinton supporters will come on board when they see the sexism lodged at Palin and now her daughter. If anyone’s judgement should be questioned, and I have no doubt it is right now in the Obama camp, it was the decision to not put Clinton on the ticket.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Kim you are so right on! Checked all the polls, McCain not up in one of them!

Posted by: Reily | September 2, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

“Mack…don’t let the slime here on these blogs get to you.”
I would definitely define some of them as slime. Look at the way they attacked one of their own, Hillary.
Country first always.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

alpaig52….you are right and BO’s decision NOT to ask Hillary caused alot of Republicans to heave a sigh of relief…as she is such a strong candidate. I voted for her and donated to her(I’m Independent)….but have gladly sent money to McCain camp now. B. Hussein just cannot be elected. The weakest candidate I’ve ever seen in my 50 years.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

“Look, we haqd to put up with your dumb pick TWICE. Deal with it. It’s our turn!”
Yes, you are entitled to your dumb pick. 2 Wrongs don’t make it Wright.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:17 am 2:17 am

Kim No, the bottom line is he was not picked for political reasons having nothing to do with experience. Obama to win needs to draw those blue collar and rural voters in that Clinton overwhelmingly was winning. Obama, given his own minimal experience, also needed a VP to compensate for his lack of whereas McCain doesn’t. Biden and McCain are the experienced candidates on both these tickets and neither Obama or Palin come close. The bottom line also is that had Obama gone with Kaine I have no doubt you’d be on this blog defending Kaine and his experience which is almost identical to Palins.
I think one could question the judgement of supposedly the “change” candidate as to why he would select a career politician like Biden. I love Biden, but he’s not change and he’s as entrenched in old politics as you could possibly get. I think that’s why the Obama camp is not happy about the Palin pick because she’s Obama’s female counterpart only her appeal is with those blue collar and rural voters that either McCain or Obama need to win this election.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Reily….Obama should be in double digits after his rock fest last Thursday and the media blitz. Republicans have lost 25% of their convention so far, and expected to lose more with no media coverage. It’s more important to film the drizzle/aftermath of Gustav, I guess that’s what the liberal media thinks. Well it won’t work…McCain’s fundraising is up big time and his numbers are holding steady and fairly even IN A NO BRAINER DEM YEAR, RIGHT?
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

“Everyone thinks McCain put Palin on the ticket to woo Clinton supporters but Palin’s conservative positions on social issues won’t bring alot of them over. What she can do though is appeal to those blue collar and rural voters that Hillary was overwhelmingly winning and that Biden was brought on to appeal to.”
You hit the nail on the head. I can’t really see most female Hillary supporters finding much in common with Palin. The “values voters” that did Kerry in are another story all together.

Posted by: Mack | September 2, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

General Election: McCain vs. Obama
Poll Date Sample Obama (D) McCain (R) Spread
RCP Average 08/29 – 08/31 – 48.8 44.3 Obama +4.5
CBS News 08/29 – 08/31 781 RV 48 40 Obama +8
CNN 08/29 – 08/31 927 RV 49 48 Obama +1
Gallup Tracking 08/29 – 08/31 2733 RV 49 43 Obama +6
Rasmussen Tracking 08/29 – 08/31 3000 LV 49 46 Obama +3
More Polling Data | Chart | News

Posted by: YesWeCan | September 2, 2008, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Who cares? I would rather have a pregnant 17 year old than an empty suit who is in Rezko’s backyard and Jeremiah Wright’s pulpit.
Posted by: Samantha | Sep 1, 2008 9:30:10 PM———————-
SAMANTHA, you sounds like a follower of McSHAME/McBUSH, Bill-0, Hanity, KKK_Rove & Rush supporter. SHAME ON YOU.

Posted by: JROY | September 2, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

It’s amazing that as I read an US magazine tonight on THE RECORD page, there are 3 pregnancies or births to celebrities THAT ARE NOT MARRIED. The lib Hollywood crowd, same one that supports BO, announce pregnancies between unmarrieds as if it’s a celebration, and yet this same crowd is so quick to attack Gov. Palin and Bristol. I’m just comforted that McCain knew about this and decided to go ahead and invite Gov. Palin on board. Since Bristol is 5 months along, clearly Palin knew about it. I originally thought Bristol had been keeping it a secret from her parents, since she probably didn’t know her mom was being vetted for VP.
Either way this doesn’t change my mind in the least….still voting for the best man to lead this country…John Sydney and never Barack Hussein. Palin will do a fine job…has more executive experience THAN ALL THREE CANDIDATES.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

This is why the Democrats never get elected.

Posted by: John | September 2, 2008, 2:31 am 2:31 am

It always amazes me how republicans can be so two-faced. They attack, attack, attack Obama on experience and then put a far less qualified candidate on the ticket of a 72yr old cancer surviver, they attack on values and then put a politician who puts politics before family (it should be her business, but the repubs made it ours by default, they accuse Obama of being a liar, but politifact has McCain as much more dishonest, they get up in arms about Rezko and here this woman is directly abusing power for her personal ends, they cry about liberal bloggers but it is the McCain camp that offers McCain Blogger Points or whatever they are called, and though not the last instance of their hypocrisy they have the nerve to claim that Obama is going to ruin the economy when they already have. It makes me sick to think half of our country is so completely ignorant of their own self-righteous hypocrisy. The fascist right is the source of much that is wrong with the US, but they won’t fool, scare, or threaten us this into voting against our better interests this year.

Posted by: Dirt in the eye | September 2, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

This is not a relevant political issue, no its not. But that doesn’t mean it won’t be all over the media. People love this stuff and they watch it, so it gets reported (the media is driven by ratings and money, after all).
No campaign needs to push this story, and it would be a story no matter which party it involved. People just love dirt, so these kinds of stories just get legs of their own.
I personally find the question of abuse of power much more relevant, particularly if its true (as has been alleged) that she had engaged in similar behavior when she was mayor.
I do have to wonder though, what kind of person would stake his or her political career on someone they barely knew, met once, and seemingly, had not thoroughly screened.

Posted by: txmom | September 2, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

The McCain people seem to think that the media vetting Palin where the McCain campaign did not is a sign of fear or of unfairness or even sexism. Wrong. Obama has been thoroughly vetted for the last year and a half (unless your an anti-christ conspiracy theorist) and we have the same right to know who this person is as we did to find out who he is. It is rather unfair of McCain to do this to people who were considering voting for him. Her views are radical to say the least and her blatant contempt for science and the environment is highly disturbing. The fact is that this comes of as a cynical attempt to play politics with gender and I fear that it will backfire. I went from considering McCain a viable alternative to understanding that the man is more double speak than straight talk and ruling altogether. He said he wanted a VP who could step right into the job in case he has health problems and this is his solution? Scary.

Posted by: Vetting | September 2, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

Well Debra,
Let me explain it to you. I don’t think liberals or democrats care a fig, really, about whether Sarah Palin stays home with her kids or has a political career, and I don’t really think they are all that much interested in whether her daughter had premarital sex.
I think what they are driving at is the fact that conservative Republicans constantly preach that women should be at home with their kids, except when those women are conservative republican politicians, and they rage against premarital sex, but find it very consistent with family values when it involves the child of a conservative republican politician.
Yes, I think what’s getting them all fired up is the apparent hypocrisy here.

Posted by: txmom | September 2, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

VETTING….Obama was not vetted regarding Rev. Wright, Rezko and Ayers before his 11 state win in Feb…he would never have won in Iowa if they knew the 20 relationship of the mentor/uncle who married him, baptised his girls and yelled racist, hateful anti-American sermons from the pulpit. BO’s relationship with Ayers and Rezko (and still being looked into) hadn’t been revealed before Feb. either….SO OBAMA WASN’T VETTED.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

Oh and Debra,
You are voting now for the “best man” for the job?
I thought you were a disaffected Hillary supporter and were only voting for McCain because he chose a woman.

Posted by: txmom | September 2, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

tx mom….no, I switched to McCain when Hillary dropped out. I am an Independent who would rather see a Hillary or McCain Presidency but NEVER an Obama Presidency…AND DON’T CALL ME A RACIST.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:52 am 2:52 am

Vote the issues and please stop all the mudslinging. Judge a man by his family and his work. Do you really want to pay $4 a gallon gas and get involved with another war while our own country drowns? This is what John McCain will give you. Stop all the innuendo, murder plots, sexism, racism and religiosity.
Put America first so that WE can get out of this hole.

Posted by: Inata | September 2, 2008, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Inata…McCain DOES PUT AMERICA FIRST…THAT’S WHY MILLIONS OF US WILL BE VOTING FOR HIM. Obama and his celebrity only come first with him and it is so apparent to all. WHAT HAS HE DONE FOR ANY OF US? Really, what has he done in 2 years, except campaign for Prez? His ego is the biggest thing he has going for him.

Posted by: Debra | September 2, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

You know, maybe McCain isn’t as dumb as people think , maybe he did more vetting then people think, maybe he understands the American public better then people think because all of these attacks on Palin and her family and now this young girl’s boyfriend who certainly has no reason to be dragged into the National media are going to backfire . Both pro-choice and pro-life families deal with this kind of situation throughout the Country every day despite whether those kids had comprehensive sex education or abstinence based sex education. We are talking teenagers here. If anyone should understand that it should be the liberals, the far left, the Obama supporters and in anyway to justify these attacks based on your belief that the far right is hypocritical is just bogus. All it says is you’re no different then the very people you so vehemently disagree with and despise.
You are a bunch of elitists and I hope those blue collar and rural voters who both McCain and Obama need to have on board to win, go out and kick the Democratic tickets behind in November
because they don’t deserve the White House anymore then the Republicans do.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 2, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Debra,
Where did I call you a racist?
I never mentioned anything about race or racism.
Do you have some kind of complex about this?

Posted by: txmom | September 2, 2008, 3:06 am 3:06 am

Mike M:
Obama has being to Europe and has travelled the world. Obama is a Harvard trained attorney, he has the means to do that. Remember Obama co authored the legislation baring the proliferation of nukes around the world. He was on tour of some nuclear sites with senator Lugar a couple of years back. Obama has being to Africa as well. You cannot travel to Europe from The United States without going through Europe, especially if you are traveling in a commercial airplane. Plain has only being outside the United States once in her entire life. She only got a U.S. passport last year. And this is the person ready to be a commander in chief. Does she even know where Pakistan or Georgia is?

Posted by: Albert | September 2, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

alpaig,
I am puzzled by your logic. So if someone has difficulties in their life, or makes bad decisions, it makes them like “everyone else” and this then means they will be a great President?
Wow. No I don’t want a president who is “just like everyone else.” I mean, my ex brother in law whose got two illegitimate kids and has had three divorces, he’s a nice guy, and he’s just like lots of other people, but I don’t think he’s qualified to run the country.
And Debra, the press has looked into all those things about Obama you mentioned, even though some of these things concern looking not into his life, but into the lives of those around him (even casual acquaintances).
So by your reasoning, its perfectly okay to be looking into Sarah Palin’s daughter’s private life.
Frankly, you are wrong on both counts.

Posted by: txmom | September 2, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

Having a 17 year old pregnant unwed daughter is something many families are dealing with. ALL of those families have to look at the family dynamics and perhaps reassess their priorities- including Sarah Palin. She has a daughter and a 4month old special needs baby that both need her. Yes, dad is there. But we all know moms and dads are not interchangeable. They both play an important and irreplaceable role. Perhaps she should put her family first and think about running for VP later.

Posted by: AngieJ | September 2, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am

Remember: everyone uses drugs every day. Count them in your house 4 fun.

Posted by: a. chenhall | September 2, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

Debra, if you switched to McCain after Hillary dropped out, you were not voting for Hillary. You were voting for a White Woman. If you were voting for HILLARY and supporting her causes, you couldn’t possibly vote for JM. He is against everything Hillary stands for. I can (sorta)understand Hillary supporters sitting out this election, but voting for JM in place of HC is simply moronic. Didn’t you hear her speech and her question to her supporters???? JM will wipe out everything Hillary supports. If Obama wins, Hillary will play a very important role in his administration – not in McCains’.

Posted by: AngieJ | September 2, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

Unwed teen age daughter!? ABC news is talking about a teen aged daughter who isn’t involved in the political debate. This unwed teen aged daughter wasn’t on the road with her mom.
Like Hillary Clinton who ABC implied multiple times that Chelsea was separate from the debate although she was on the road with the Hill team.
Equally entertaining is the notion that Obama Wife and Kids are off of the debate even though his wife is never two inches from the Limelight. The Obamas directly shoved their kids into interviews with reporters, a bit ignorantly.
But after all who is keeping count? I am sure Paulins daughter snuck out and did some political fundrasing and interviewing while espousing her political POV. Which would completely justify this, right?

Posted by: annoyamouse | September 2, 2008, 3:48 am 3:48 am

Life is soooo precious until you’re born. But after that… You’re on your own.

Posted by: a. chenhall | September 2, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

we only use “Pro-Life” depleted uranium “bunker busters”. Radiation disfigurement for Jesus.

Posted by: a. chenhall | September 2, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am

My take on all this is, if you listen to Rush Limbaugh and Hawn Hanity , McCain is following their lead. This is not the pick he would have made. He is a follower not a leader. Country first yeah right. Destroy this family for political purpose.

Posted by: Erv | September 2, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am

My republican son voted for Hillary Clinton. I fell off my chair when he told me. He said, Hillary is extremely intelligent and could have been one of the best presidents of our time.
My son thought I would be voting for Obama since he is corrupt and most democrats are blindly voting for him. I am not voting for Obama. Frankly, I don’t think my president’s name should be Barrack Hussein Obama Jr. I would have more respect for Obama if he went to his native country Kenya and help them become civilized. Instead Obama is trying to make America into a 3rd world country like Kenya. I hate the name Barrack Hussein Obama. Period. It’s like drinking sewer water. gike!
I Love You Hillary. Obama NEVER.

Posted by: Mrs. Phoenix | September 2, 2008, 5:24 am 5:24 am

So many people with the same tired and downright stupid line:
“Yes, we agree that the pregnancy is not a political issue that shouldn’t receive consideration… BUT it speaks to John McCain’s competency in vetting his VP!”
OK Geniuses… explain to the rest of us what exactly is wrong with McCain NOT giving consideration to an issue that EVERYONE agrees does NOT deserve consideration?
Palin will do a fine job as VP… When a kid makes a mistake, most parents’ first instinct is not “Oh! I’ll quit my day job to coddle you so that you never have to face real life!”
Yet this seems to be the action people are demanding of her. By a freak coincidence, proferrers of said advice all happen to be Obama supporters. By even bigger coincidence, following said advice would just happen to take her out of the running for VP.
Such “advice” is painfully transparent. Palin chose the right course of action with her daughter’s situation. I look forward to many more correct decisions when she’s VP.

Posted by: Catain Obvious | September 2, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am

The respect McCain has shown Obama and now Obama is showing Palin is extraordinary. I hope it points towards a brighter, more diverse future for the US and, eventually, for the Western world. Do you think a black President or female VP could enfranchise others in the States and across the globe? I’d love to know your thoughts on the FreshMinds Talent Blog: http://blogs.freshminds.co.uk/talent/?p=385

Posted by: Charlie Boss | September 2, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am

If it happened to Obama and the response is a hypothetical.
But it did happen to Palin and the response by Democrats has been thuggish, shrill, disgusting, obscene, petty and very revealing of low, dirty gutter standards of many Democrats. How could the reaction be any worse that what the Democrats (and press) have shown.

Posted by: Sally J. | September 2, 2008, 6:06 am 6:06 am

Once the party of human dignity, human rights, womens rights, the party of the people, now the democratic party has become the party of thugs, goons, low life trash.
I was a democrat all my adult life. What was I thinking? Hillary is the only true democrat, the one I love and respect. NO Obama. Kenya refugee.

Posted by: Mrs. Phoenix | September 2, 2008, 6:18 am 6:18 am

“Look, I got two daughters — 9 years old and 6 years old,” he said. “I am going to teach them first about values and morals, but if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at age 16, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”
Punished with a baby… he already is a terrible father.

Posted by: sh | September 2, 2008, 6:49 am 6:49 am

And her daughter being pregnant makes her unfit because? Oh wait, because she has more experience at running something bigger than their own campaign? Yes folks Obama, said on 9/1/08 on tv that he was the more experienced of the 2( himself and Palin) because he ran HIS OWN CAMPAIGN for 2 years. Well, not that running a state is the same as the country but it is a heck of a lot more important and demanding than a campaign. Is anyone really listening to this guy? The last I checked Palin was running for VP not the president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
By his own admission, Obama says, he is experienced at running a campaign and that gives him more experience that the the leader of a state. Where is this guy from and what is he thinking. The sad part is he believes it! Do you believe it also???????? Change might be a good thing but are you sure the change you are going to get with Obama is going to help this county.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008, 6:50 am 6:50 am

Now that the damage has been done by the largest of the 0bama supporters — Daily Kos and Andrew Sullivan — they can pull back and act above the fray. Please. This is so like everything this campaign has done from its early days. Chicago politics as usual.

Posted by: beebop | September 2, 2008, 6:54 am 6:54 am

Mr. Wray is an example of a win at all cost person. Ms. Palins daughter is just like many kids who simply made a mistake, has nothing to do with politics, has nothing to do with how she was raised, has nothing to do with the values of her Mom. I am an older man, the result of a Mom who was 16 at my birth. She is and always has been a wonderful Mother, a mother of 4 and grandmother of 6, a dedicated democrat(to my chagrin). So please Mr. wray and others like you dismount from your high horse and leave it alone. There are issues important to us all and we don’t get to hear them for all this nonsense.

Posted by: david | September 2, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am

Throughout the campaign, Obama’s more ardent supporters have been extremely detrimental to his efforts to ‘seal the deal’ not only with independents and Reagan Democrats but with mainstreams Dems who see the party being taken over by the moveon.org crowd. Obama is trying to reign in the extremes but this group too often comes off as hysterical, tantrumy narcissistic children and many are obviously hesitant to vote with them even though people generally want to vote for a Democrat. I think those who want to vote for a Democrat but are hesitant are really afraid to elect a candidate who might give this blood thirsty group and their lunacy any real power. These ‘supporters’ need to realize that they are hurting their candidate.

Posted by: mpCT | September 2, 2008, 7:08 am 7:08 am

Since when is a pregnancy a violation of family values?
If Bristol marries the guy, and keeps the baby, how is this wrong?
Oh, by the way, Ann Dunham Obama gave birth to Barack when she was 18.
Tramp.

Posted by: drjohn | September 2, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

This is all the Democrats have- they are reduced to attacking children.
That is sad.
They duck the issue that Palin has more experience than Obama.

Posted by: drjohn | September 2, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

That’s right, everybody. Keep up with the Palin daughter smears.
Keep suggesting the ‘hypocrisy’ of the Republicans.
You sound just like John Kerry and John Edwards did when they thought they were being sly by noting that Cheney’s daughter is a lesbian.
The subtext is exactly same:
“A responsible Republican does NOT have a lesbian daughter/pregnant teenage daughter.”
And it’s going to play just as well with voters now as it did then.
Republicans will rally around Palin (shocked by this? Republicans are people, too) and Independents will be put off by those making the charges.
And this just may be the straw that breaks the Democrats’ backs just like it was then.

Posted by: Frost | September 2, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

No one on the Right would claim that a democrat who found his daughter pregnant was a terrible father. On the other hand a man (of either party) who cheats on his wife publicly is a terrible father and is to be held accountable for his actions. Neither party claims to be perfect people and blaming a parent for choices their 17 year old daughter made is ridiculous. You do the best you can and hope for the best. Everyone with teenagers knows this is true.

Posted by: Linda | September 2, 2008, 7:27 am 7:27 am

“Private Issue” in a presidential campaign? Is everyone crazy? This is definitely a public concern. So-called “conservatives” went insane because Jamie Lynn Spears got pregnant and she is just in a TV show. Everyone was in an uproar over what a terrible role model she is! Now these same folks are saying having a pregnant teen in the White House for children have as a role model is perfectly fine? No way!! Republicans have one rule for themselves and another for everyone else.
And these kids are going to get married at ages 17 & 18?? What a joke! So by the time they’re 23 they’ll be divorced with 3 or 4 screwed up kids running around. Nice.
Sarah Palin is going around proclaiming she is a dedicated prolifer because she gave birth to a down syndrome baby. Well, there are only 2 tests available to pregnant women to determine with certainty if a child will be born with Down Syndrome. Both are extremely risky to the fetus!! Why would you put your unborn baby at risk for miscarriage if you intended to continue the pregnancy no matter what?? The only reason any pregnant women chooses to take this risk is because they want the choice to terminate the pregnancy. If she says anything else she is lying. Yes, she ultimately chose to keep her child–which is wonderful–but she did so after putting him as great risk.
Another hypocrisy: Sarah Palin and her commercial fisherman husband are both avid hunters. Pro-life?? Apparently they are arrogant enough to decide that some lives are worth saving and that they have the right to take others. There are repulsive photos of her and her husband on her Alaska governor’s web page under “bio” of her all smiles with some poor murdered deer whose live she stole for no reason.
This woman is a phony hipocrit.

Posted by: sg_NE | September 2, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am

Obama supporters are as ugly or worse than the Bushies in terms of the vitriol they spew. I won’t vote McCain, but I’m not voting for Obama either. What a joke this election is going to be.

Posted by: mhhunt | September 2, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

Obama is a Chicago con and the world is finally waking up……..
Obama never won the primary. Obama stole it from Hillary.The world watched as the DNC handed the nomination to Obama by silencing voters.
The media can say what they want about Obama winning the primary but voters know the truth, especially Clinton supporters. Obama ignored voters. Florida and Michigan will never forget it.
Obama and Michelle were given a second chance to put Hillary on his ticket, but instead chose to hog the glory and embarrass the Democratic Party.
Obama could have won these women over. He should have taken advantage of the Clinton’s popularity and the love still felt for them throughout the world. Instead, he lost more respect from women across America. McCain is winning the Hillary women with his VP pick.
Obama is risky, radical and not a great patriot. Remember: Rezko, (the criminal), Reverend Wright (the anti Semitic racist) and William Ayers ( Obama’s coworker = domestic terrorist)
The list of his ugly friends with radical beliefs are endless.
God is watching and the world is laughing at our unfair voting process in the Democratic Party.
Obama should step down.

Posted by: Al from NJ | September 2, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Do Republicans really want to bring up silencing voters? As I recall it was Al Gore who should have been in the White House rather than the incompetent destroyer of America that’s in there now. Instead of placing Al Gore in his rightful position, Republicans turned to their cronies in a state led by George Bush’s own brother and on the Supreme Court.
Again, talk about silencing voters?

Posted by: sg_NE | September 2, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Sg_NE
You don’t know anything about the Florida election. Every recount that has been done since the election, including a YEAR LONG recount done by the media making sure to count every possible vote in an exhaustive fashion, found that Bush won Florida.
They had election laws in Florida, which were followed to the letter by Republicans during the recount. Gore wanted to keep recounting votes until he found a way to win. They even did recounts ONLY in Gore heavy counties trying to alter the total. The liberal Florida Supreme Court decided that what was said very clearly in Florida election law had to be overturned to give their fellow Democrats time to try and find enough votes to win. Eventually, the US Supreme Court decided Florida election law should stand, and that they’d recounted enough.
But it’s all moot in the end, as again, every recount done since has shown that Bush won anyway.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Thank you McCain and Palin for once again taking away from the real issues. They both knew that once this came out, the American public would be talking about her daughter’s pregnancy and not the issues. A classic Republican move. I’m not saying that teen pregnancy isn’t a real issue. It just seems to me that the only time that people really want to focus on it, is when it happens to someone’s kid who is in the public eye. What a shame.
I won’t be voting for McCain. He has showed just how out of touch he is with the average American voter.
As for Hillary, I think her speech said it all. It’s a shame that people can’t put their hurt feelings aside to do what’s best for the Country. Some of Hillary’s supporters remind me of the kids that you see on the play ground, if they don’t get their way they will take their toys and go home. I am an Obama supporter. Had Hillary won the nomination and she chose not to put Obama on the ticket. I still would have voted for her. It makes no sense for people to complain about the state of this Country. When they are willing to vote for another Republican into office all because Obama didn’t put her on the ticket. I just hope that the Hillary supporters who vote for McCain can handle 4 more years of the same old crap. When things go from bad to worse for the rest of us. I hope that they can live with the fact that they helped this happen.

Posted by: Love | September 2, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Why don’t you people try picking on an adult…leave this little girl alone at least until she graduates high school…how about a little decency?
I don’t understand the hate-fullness and mean-spiritedness you see from libs today. It should go against everything you all stand for no? I read a couple posts and the comments section at the Kos about this…it makes me sad to know that so many people can be that nasty and hateful to a 17-year old girl just because her mom is a Republican. How ironic and hypocritical.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

This just demonstrates the abject hypocrisy and intolerance of liberal Democrats! These are the same people who tried to tell us that Bill Clinton having oral sex performed on him in the Oval Office was irrelevant. If Gov. Palin’s daughter had had an abortion, these people would think that she was cool for standing up for her rights. So this whole argument is about abortion. Well what about her right to have the baby? Her own parents don’t have a problem with it, so why should anyone else?

Posted by: Daniel Waldschmidt | September 2, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

I think John Mccain has just shown to the American people about his poor jugdment picking some one to be your VP and then go after to check her record is like given the best medication to some body who is death, i think Sara Palin did not do her work as a mother because a mother has to teach her girls about sex eduation from the start of their menstration so she has failed on that, secondly she is a teeneger and the guy who inpregnated her most be a teeneger too so who will pay the bills for two unemployed couples, the family communique of Mr and Mrs Palin yesterday is a spam message because being a parent comes responsibility were in the world has a seventeen year old becomes responsible, i think John Mccain has put politics first and country second this contradict his own message as writen on the baner of the 29/08/2008 when he introduce Mrs Sara Palin.

Posted by: louis | September 2, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Yes, we all know George Bush won Florida. Apparently some feel a year long recount and a fiasco of a voting system is something to be proud of.
The point is that many Floridians felt disenfranchised, similar to what many Hillary supporters feel.
More Americans voted for Al Gore than George Bush. He won the popular vote.
The electoral college should be abolished–but that’s another story.

Posted by: sg_NE | September 2, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

Looks like the liberal blogs are getting nervous after the smear campaign against Gov Palin. Did you know Newsweek and moveon funds the Daily Kos which was spreading lies about Palin. Obama realized it will backfire so he came up with a strong response. Shame on you liberal left…
- A McCain Democrat from MA

Posted by: vs | September 2, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

I for one could care less about the pregnancy of a 17 yr. old. NOW what I do care for the hipocrisy and the spinning done to this story, the evangelical republicans radicals (who are responsible for the sad state of the country due to the 8 yrs of bush) are willing to turn the other cheek and forget about the pre-maritial sex part and suddenly just concentrate on the no abortion part… HYPOCRITES either you are consistent with all of the actions and not just concentrate on one for beneficiary reasons… and worst of all how they came out of the word work when Jaimie Lynn Spears, and now suddenly it’s ok cause she has a mother with values “WHAT A JOKE”, if the republicas didn’t act all rightous and mighty it wouldn’t have been a big deal but since they live finger pointing at others of course people will bring it up…and second is Pailin really in touch with people when she only supports teaching abstinence and is against sex education? I think her daughter proved her wrong on so many levels.

Posted by: Nvas | September 2, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

David,
I could not have said it any better.

Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

palin should go back and fix her family first instead of running for VP

Posted by: scambus | September 2, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Psa 26:4 I did not sit with liars, and I will not be found among hypocrites.
These so called evangelicals who are really political cronies hiding behind the cloth love the Republican Party more than they love God. They don’t have any family values. But we all know if that were Michelle Obama’s or Hillary Clinton’s pregnant teenage daughter Tony Perkins and others would be pointing a finger at them and saying what a poor example they are setting. They would be raking these mothers across the hotest of coals.
As a born again, bible-toting Christian, I’m offended by these hypocrites

Posted by: mary | September 2, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

anyone who believe that McCain knew about this before the selected Palin is lying to themselves.
Let me get this straight …McCain who has been complaining that Obama is getting all the media attention decides that at the RNC he instead of being able to get his message out wanted to defend his selection process for veep ? COme on people … he didnot know this ahead of time but must now must lie about it other wise it looks like Mavrick means I make my decisions haphazardly.
this is a big mess for the Republicans … they are trying so hard to say leave the girl alone … THEY are the ones making it about the girl … if they wanted to protect the girl they would be coming out and speaking about how this is not a reflection of mccains ability to think …

Posted by: skippy | September 2, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

“Children are like wet cement. Whatever falls on them makes an impression.” Dr. Haim Ginott”
What impression did Jeremiah Wright and William Ayres make on the Obama kids?
I’m sure some Clinton supporters recognize the Obama smear tactics.

Posted by: geevill | September 2, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

The scum Obuma attracts are spouting their venom again, so quick to spread the stink of hate everywhere.
He sits back as head of the gang and lets the thugs do the dirty work, a true leader of garbage.
He spends and spend and can not seal the deal, loser!
WE know you’re out there, Bots, why don’t you find out how much the faux possum seal, the 747 paint job, the around-the-world ego trip and the mile-high coronation cost and come back to tell us? Inquiring minds want to know how you’re being taken for a ride.

Posted by: HP Boston | September 2, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

I’m so happy that the so many of the Democrats commenting in this thread show themselves to be so tolerant of others. Heaven forbid that anyone, other than a liberal, makes a mistake in judgement as this young lady has done.
Does teaching abstinence always work? Of course not you idiots! But does teaching nothing but birth control work? Obviously not since the unwed birth rate is constantly increasing. So what’s wrong with teaching all of it, including the FACT that the only 100% reliable birth control method is abstinence.
I have to say I am sickened by the outpouring of vitriol from liberals I have witnessed since the the announcement of Sarah Palin to be a candidate for VP.
I challenge anyone to show me examples from any mainstream conservative site that even remotely approaches the hate spewed by some of the people commenting on this site.

Posted by: Terry Ostlund | September 2, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

The high road is admirable – but what are legitimate attacks on Sarah Palin? …….
http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/09/02/regarding-attacks-on-sarah-palin/

Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | September 2, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

The Democrat Party – from Camelot (JFK) to Gutter Trash in two short generations.
Ya’ll are so wound up in your self-hatred that you cannot see reality anymore. I have nothing but pity for you.

Posted by: MW1961 | September 2, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Attacking a candidate’s children? Those of you doing this should be ashamed of themselves. I’m genuinely surprised at the venom and glee of these Obama supporters. It’s disturbing the vicious, nasty sort of people Obama is managing to attract.
Obviously McCain knew about this from the vetting process and decided that it didn’t matter. I completely agree. Palin’s a real person dealing with the real twists and turns of life… as we all are.

Posted by: Joe | September 2, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Most Americans can relate to Sarah Palin and her family.
Obama’s strange family A fist bumbing wife. zero friends. racist church. terrorist neighbor. convicted felon business partner.

Posted by: geevill | September 2, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Uh how old was Obmama’s momma when she got knocked up? Exactly. Keep silent Barack. And your rabid, brainwashed cult base “fans” too. (Also those same afflicted in the media)

Posted by: argh! | September 2, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

If Chelsey Clinton became pregnant as a teen in the white house what then would the my fellow republicans & the media be saying about it?

Posted by: food for thought | September 2, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

At the end of the day I think the biggest truth from this issue is that sexual abstinence as the only federal sponsored program/policy to tackle teenage pregnancy has been debunked by the very people that are trying to push for it.
Bravo Palin family. The democrats couldn’t have said it better. What a lovely dose of irony for the Republicans.

Posted by: ella | September 2, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

oh and argh! that’s exactly what this article is about. Obama has strictly said that he doesn’t believe in dragging anyone’s family through the political mud, AND he mentioned in his OFFICIAL statement that his mother gave birth to him at 18. So PLEASE stop wasting everybody’s time with your purely idiotic factually WRONG statements.

Posted by: ella | September 2, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

My neighbor is part of a group of republican bloggers. He and his group hold webinars several times a week to establish and frame arguments for their comments. The leader of the group is or was a paid employee of Rick Davis, Karl Rove’s protege, who is now running McCain’s Campaign. The primary focus of the group is to frame offensive and tasteless posts appearing to be Democrats attacking McCain and now his running mate and her family. Until last weekend, although I knew of their activities, I had no idea how harmful they were. I’m an Obama supporter. Like most democrats, I subscribe to Obama’s take that families are off limits. So my neighbor posts nasty comments about the Palins, a republican pretending to be a democrat, with the goal of stirring up the republican base and independents against those awful democrats. As a strategy, this comes directly from Rove and his puppet McCain. The goal is to avoid the discussion of real issues, and turn people against the Obama campaign, just as they did in the primaries, turning the Clinton Campaign against the Obama campaign. They are very clever.

Posted by: David | September 2, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

geevill get with the times. Fist bumps are very common. Oh I guess not with your generation though.

Posted by: oo | September 2, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Palin it is very important as VP because McCain is 72 years old. He is not superman, truth is he is a VERY OLD MAN, his VP should be more than ready for POTUS.
Does it make sense?

Posted by: Anna | September 2, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

I respectfully submit that you critics of Palin don’t quite get it.
Simply because you hold certain views (about family or whatever) does not mean your family is expected to be perfect in every respect. That is a REALLY important point not a throw -away defense.
Why? Because the whole philosophy of conservatism has among its premises that humans are not perfect nor perfectable. We ARE expected to try to live morally, but that does not mean people never make mistakes, nor can we have children who’s behavior is always perfect.
That’s why we believe in freedom and responsiblity, not a utopian vision of “progressive” government control of our affairs. Think about it, please.
Thank you!
Craig

Posted by: Craig | September 2, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Craig maybe you should lend some of that understanding to Obama’s case as I haven’t seen much tolerance being directed his way.

Posted by: ella | September 2, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Also, are you implying that only republicans/conservatives have the sole domain over such ideas as the acceptance of imperfection and the strive for ideals? Like as if some how you conservatives are the only progressive thinkers in the political and ideological landscape. Get it?

Posted by: ella | September 2, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Obama is just as vulnerable to this as she is. He jumps on her he undercuts himself. He’s using his biography to catapult him to the White House while his surrogates are using the same circumstance to attack Palin’s daughter. That’s hypocrisy! He can’t have it both ways. If it’s an honorable thing for his mom to make the right choice, then it’s honorable for Ms. palin with her baby with down’s syndrome, and her daughter for having hers at her age. Obama can’t win on this issue without undercutting himself. So he and his supposrters should keep silent. Attack Palin for this, especially her family, and her decision about what to do with her body, and your attacking ALL women, and supposedly your base if you Obama. Dumb move. Just let it go. It’s only helpful to Democrats if Republicans are mad about it, they LOVE it. Sorry Obama, try harder next time!

Posted by: argh! | September 2, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Argh! please read the article above, to which we are directing our comments. It clearly states that Obama has officially said that this matter should be off limits to all who wish to speculate. I am at a loss, you seem to be impervious to reason OR fact. Argh!, are you an idiot?

Posted by: ella | September 2, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I think the Republicans knew exactly what they were doing with this pick and the ensuing scandal was a no-brainer. The only reason Palin is on the ticket is that she was handpicked by the CNP – Religious Right precisely and only because of her Pro-Life hard line. And she earned the party $10 Mil that very day! What Palin brings to the ticket is controversy, the battle over womens uteruses (except her daughters) which she and they dragged into it… oh, and “Family Values” and the hopes that anyone who wishes to really talk about the true issues will be smeared with nasty mud. So Sarah Palin, First Question… Separation of Church and State? Is Armerica a Christian Nation? Links to Dominionist Christianity? (which is not mainstream Christianity)

Posted by: Kathy | September 2, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Leave the kid out of this. Question Palin’s political decisions and definitely look closely at her decisions as governor but leave the daughter out of this.
Obama said the right thing and you need to give him credit for that whether you think it was a political move or truly a personal response.
Obama-Biden 2008!

Posted by: Annoyed | September 2, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

This Palin issue once again throws light on the hypocrisy of the Republican party. They claim to speak for the unborn babies, yet they don’t mind sending bombs and missiles to kill hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq including women and children. Republicans think only the life of the unborn chlid is sacred, but once you are born, you are not worth anything;expecially if you are not white and christian

Posted by: Adjaloo | September 2, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Republicans think they own the value issues. Yet cannot prevent their daughters from fornicating around. They pontificate on morality, yet are corrupt like the devil himself. The hypocrisy of these republicans is stunning and shocking!

Posted by: siam | September 2, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE REPORTERS?
Why is Palin’s approval of (even brief membership in) a secessionist party not treasonous — 100 times worse than any of the other stuff about her people are complaining of?
It shows her to be totally anti-American. Where is our responsible journalism?

Posted by: Eric Howlett | September 2, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Leave her alone. Leave her Alone. Republicans are so quick to defend Palins daughter’s pregnancy as off limits. When you walk around claiming to be the compass of moral values, nothing is off limits.
I bet if one of the Obama girls got pregnant. It wouldnt be off limits, The republicans would run wild with.

Posted by: The White Man World. | September 2, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Right Eric – secessionist membership is a serious concern. Think it through, people: Sure, the unfortunate situation with her daughter is just that, unfortunate. Happens.
But to say that’s not a real issue is not the same as saying there are no issues. In her first major address as nominee she lied to us, saying she had turned down the money for the bridge to nowhere. They stopped the project, but kept the money.
Membership in a secessionist society should be of deep concern, as should Troopergate, should it turn out that she’s guilty of that.
McCain’s poor vetting is more example of a poorly run campaign (as if we needed more), and that doesn’t bode well for his running of the country. I have a hard time understanding how one could care about the future of the country and want McCain and Palin to lead it.

Posted by: David In NC | September 2, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

The Republicans on this site expected that they could say horrible things, peddle terrible stories about Obama, his family, and Democrats in general, pound us again and again, and not be hit back eventually by the Democrats they ticked off. Sounds naive to me.
If you decide anything goes in sliming and defaming a party, and you use this ruthless approach to batter the political opposition out of contention, sooner or later, some of these people will see being a little ruthless as the only way to defend their interests and their candidates.
If you feel so shocked, so dismayed, so outraged by the corrosive attention these folks have been getting in the Palin family, you should step back and consider just how everybody feels about this “vetting” that Republicans have been doing about Obama’s life and family.

Posted by: Stephen Daugherty | September 2, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

i have to hand it to obama….he gives the appearance of having his hands clean while his staffers and supporters do his dirty work, many of them displaying outright racism and sexism against his opponents and their supporter….

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

did obama wink at his supporters when he suggested that palin’s daughter was off-limits?

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

did GOVERNOR Palin subject her kids to the hateful rantings of their pastor?

Posted by: chris | September 2, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

I am afraid I don’t understand why this should be a “private matter”.
Just two days ago Republican commentators were pointing to Gov. Palin’s “Personal Biography” as the very reason why we should be voting for her.
Just TWO DAYS ago her supporters and advocates celebrated her “personal biography”, her decision as a 40+-year old woman to have a child with down’s syndrome as THE VERY REASON we should be voting for her.
Now, two-days later, after a potentially embarrassing revelation, her “personal biography” is off-limits?
What changed? Does the entire Republican party, like Sen. McCain, no longer know its own mind?

Posted by: m@cchiavelli | September 2, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

McCain chose Palin not because of her very limited political experience but because she supposedly embodies those superior family values that satisfy the extreme-right. Therefore, it is fair for US citizen to question her family values and family matters.
The most dangerous aspect of Palin is her ties with the AIP. I think US voters should consider the possible consequences to the unity of this country if she ever becomes president of the US, which is pretty plausible considering McCain’s health situation and age.

Posted by: Carmen | September 2, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

I am afraid I don’t understand why this should be a “private matter”.
Is sex-education, and the efficacy of various forms of sex-education – abstinence only, contraception use, not a matter of public policy?
Just two days ago, Republicans were cheering on Gov. Palin, in particular for her choice as a 40+ year old woman to carry a child with down’s syndrome to term. Republicans made Gov. Palin’s “private life” a matter of “public discussion”. They cheered because they told voters she was particularly qualified BECAUSE OF HER PERSONAL BIOGRAPHY : here is a woman who not only talks-the-talk, but also walks-the-walk.
So, we are just taking them up on their invitation, and examining that personal biography closely. There is nothing slimy about it.

Posted by: m@cchiavelli | September 2, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Notice how neoconservative/religious right-types are quickest to forgive their own for foibles and missteps, and fastest to lash out and condemn those that don’t conform to their views? It’s called hypocrisy.

Posted by: PC | September 2, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

I have always been tired of the GOP using Religion and God to sway voters….it should simply be about the critical issues and the best leaders to build concensus and implement necessary change to help ALL Americans, not just the faithful. I thought it was hypocritical that Gov. Palin had her poor 17year old daughter holding the 4-month baby with a blanket covering her belly…if she was sooo proud, why were they hiding this? This is so obviously a tactic and it insults educated women like me who can see right thru this risky move. I wonder how the GOP and the media would react if it was a political family that happeed to be Hispanic or black? Would we see it as simply a “common mistake”?! or, would we call it another example of the lack of American values and a baby out of wedlock?!?
Clearly there is a double standard and hypocrisy…Again, it should be about the best candidates and focus on issues.

Posted by: mo | September 2, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

fine, everyone can question the experience factor.
fact, President McKinley died after being shot back in 1901, then 42 VP Teddy Roosevelt became president
how did that work out folks?
experience, ‘heartbeat away’ bunch of crap…

Posted by: Teddy | September 2, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm

this is about McCain, period. he says he knew ahead of time that Palin’s minor daughter was pregnant … this is a lie.
Look .. McCain has been doing everything he can for months to get traction. He has been crying that he gets no news coverage.
Do you really believe that with the full spot light of the media on the RNC McCain wanted to spend his time saying keep the girl out of it or … yes Palin was fully vetted ? Answer is no.
You know as well as I do McCain wanted to be spending this time attacking Obama. He has wasted some of his prime time coverage to do so by having to spend time spinning this.
You people are crazy to continue to harp on …leave the girl alone BS.
This is all about McCain the fact that not enough folks are talking about McCain tells me that the spin to deflect this away from McCain and on to this girl is working.
This is shameful … McCain an adult should be stepping up and telling the American people why he chose to have something like this disclosed the way it was to the world. Had he know he should have announced it and after announcing it said, now everyone back off the girl; and folks would have. The way this came out is borderline scandaleous. McCain chose how this came out … and in doing so he is responsible for the way the media is reacting to this HE john mccain has put this girl in the media limelight.
This is about McCain … anyone who thinks otherwise drinks too much mainstream media kool aid.

Posted by: digbat | September 2, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

“This is more about McCain’s JUDGEMENT on choosing someone… who has very little experience particularly foreign policy experience.”
What a joke! That’d disqualify Obama! He goes to Jerusalem on his grand “I’m almost President” tour and produces the elementary gaffe that occupied Jerusalem “will remain the capital of Israel and it must remain undivided”.

Posted by: Jim C. | September 2, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

am one of those independents that everyone wants to swing to their side of the Dem/Rep line and here is where I am at right now. I have not made up my mind on who to vote for as I do not know enough about Sen. Obama yet but… using a teen as a political tool turns me off. we did not see the Clinton’s, Gore’s, Bush’s, in fact… I’m 51 and I have never seen children used as weapons in America (political or otherwise). A lot of us independents are watching to see just how this plays out but as it stands right this moment… I am leaning towards voting for the republicans due to the nasty nature of the innuendos that many of the press and (as I see above) Obama supporters are putting out there. I have not made up my mind yet and Sen. Obama said what I believe is the proper course of action but this is not what I am seeing from his supporters… I am interested in seeing just how civilized and humane the Dems actually are.

Posted by: mark attebery | September 3, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Mark may i ask, what more do you expect to see from Obama. He has publicly come out against any attacks or probing of Palins family and even offered up his own teen pregnancy past in the same statement. Are you Voting for someone’s supporters or their policies. I find it very discouraging when I here people talking about democratic/republican suppporters or personalities.
Why isn’t america having this much debate about Mccain’s/Obama’s policies?
Mark, I ask you: What policies of Mccains do you support or prefer over Obama’s.

Posted by: ella | September 3, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

I am happy to see Mrs Palin’s daughter keeping her child as Palin kept her child. What makes anyone think just because you are for family values that none of our children will ever make a mistake. That would be very immature thinking. This does not mean they are a bad parent, for we can’t be with our children 24/7. You know none of us are guaranteed the “perfect” family, but what we do when one makes a mistake in life, that shows what kind of “family” it really is.
We as parents get from our “children”, it doesn’t matter what I do, or not do, for it doesn’t affect anyone but me…
this… shows that whatever we do,,,,does effect those your life touches..for the good or for the bad.
As the saying goes, when life hands you a lemon, what you need to do is to make lemonade…

Posted by: C. Alioto | September 3, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

To C. Alioto:
The article is not about Palin’s daughter keeping the baby, the article is about Obama is not attacking “the issue”. You know, 17 year old single girl, not married, being promiscuous, having a child out of wedlock…not exactly the image that the Republicans want to endorse. The article also states that if the shoe were on the other foot…the republicans would waste no time whatsoever in getting on their “failing family values, we believe in God and we are Christians and that’s why we should have a republican in the White House” soapbox.
“Higher-Up-The-Ladder Republicans” (similar to High Profile Christians) tend to sweep under the rug their transgressions and short-comings when it is convenient for them to do so. They re-write their objectives when it suits them, meanwhile, always pointing the finger at the ones who don’t agree with them and say nasty things.
At least the last time when we had a sinning (“define Sexual Relations…”) Democrat in the office, our budget was balanced, we prospered, we had jobs, and the world liked us. George Jr’s and his people have single-handedly put us into the worst debt in history, got us involved where we shouldn’t be, has the lowest approval rating ever, and has made us an outcast in the world’s eyes.
I have respect for Obama because he is not going to throw mud in this campaign. It won’t be ugly…it will be ran on the important issues. As he said in his acceptance speech…”We won’t agree on abortion. But at least we can agree that we can do something about the amount of unwanted pregnancies. We won’t agree about gay rights, but at least we can agree that they should not be discriminated against. We will not agree on gun control, but we can agree that our streets are no place for AK47s”…etc.
McCain is a man of character. I like that. I think he is a great human being for his service to his Country and his fellow POWs. What an awesome example. But unfortunately, the way he thinks is too much the way the present administration thinks…it is evident in the way he has voted…90-95% of the time WITH BUSH! McCain = 4 more years of Bush and that is the bottom line!

Posted by: MTA | September 3, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Subject: Obama & McCain on taxes
Here is why Obama is bad news and why he has no idea how to lead
A few points to remember and consider:
You can verify the tax information at
> http://money.cnn.com/news/specials/election/2008/index..html,
> if you’d like.
>
> (INTERESTING DATA JUST RECEIVED ON TAXES
> & PROPOSED CHANGES IN TAXES AFTER 2008 GENERAL
> ELECTION.)
> Time to consider your pocketbook:
>
> CAPITAL GAINS TAX
>
> MCCAIN:
> 0% on home sales up to $500,000 per home
> (couples). McCain does not propose any change in existing
> home sales income tax.
>
> OBAMA:
> 28% on profit from ALL home sales
>
> How does this affect you?
> If you sell your home and make a profit, you
> will pay 28% of your gain on taxes. If you are heading
> toward retirement and would like to down-size your home or
> move into a retirement community, 28% of the money you make
> from your home will go to taxes. This proposal will
> adversely affect the elderly who are counting on the income
> from their homes as part of their retirement income.
>
> DIVIDEND TAX
> MCCAIN : 15% (no change)
>
> OBAMA : 39.6%
>
> How will this affect you?
> If you have any money invested in stock
> market, IRA, mutual funds, college funds, life insurance,
> retirement accounts, or anything that pays or reinvests
> dividends, you will now be paying nearly 40% of the money
> earned on taxes if Obama becomes president. The experts
> predict that ‘Higher tax rates on dividends and capital
> gains would crash the stock market, yet do absolutely
> nothing to cut the deficit.’
>
> INCOME TAX (find your bracket)
> MCCAIN (no changes)
>
> Single making 30K – tax $4,500
> Single making 50K – tax $12,500
> Single making 75K – tax $18,750
> Married making 60K- tax $9,000
> Married making 75K – tax $18,750
> Married making 125K – tax $31,250
>
> OBAMA (reverse all tax cuts)
>
> Single making 30K – tax $8,400
> Single making 50K – tax $14,000
> Single making 75K – tax $23,250
> Married making 60K – tax $16,800
> Married making 75K – tax $21,000
> Married making 125K – tax $38,750
>
> Under Obama, your taxes will more than
> double!
>
> How does this affect you? No explanation
> needed. This is pretty straight
> forward.
>
> INHERITANCE TAX
>
> MCCAIN 0% (No change, Bush repealed
> this tax)
>
> OBAMA Restore the inheritance
> tax
>
> How does this affect you?
>
> Many families have lost businesses, farms,
> ranches, and homes that have been in their families for
> generations because they could not afford the inheritance
> tax. Those willing their assets to loved ones will only lose
> them to these taxes.
>
> NEW TAXES BEING PROPOSED BY OBAMA
>
> New government taxes proposed on homes that
> are more than 2400 square feet.
>
> New gasoline taxes (as if gas weren’t
> high enough already)
>
> New taxes on natural resources consumption
> (heating gas, water, electricity)
>
> New taxes on retirement accounts, and last
> but not least….
>
> New taxes to pay for socialized medicine so
> we can receive the same level of medical care as other
> third-world countries!!!
>
> THE FOREGOING IS SOMETHING YOU SHOULD BE
> AWARE OF. . . IT SHOULD MAKE YOU THINK BEFORE YOU CAST YOUR
> VOTE IN NOVEMBER.
>
> Please spread the word. This will catch
> a lot of families off guard.
>
>
>
> In God we trust!

Posted by: Grant | September 5, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.