Obama’s New 2-Minute Ad
Today, the campaign of Sen. Barack Obama released a two-minute TV ad to air nationally and in battleground states, in which Obama speaks directly to the camera about the economy.
The script for the ad is below, but the basic message is: you can trust me to take care of this; now’s the time for seriousness, not the petty distractions that have marked our political discourse as of late.
Obama: "In the past few weeks, Wall Street’s been rocked as banks closed and markets tumbled. But for many of you — the people I’ve met in town halls, backyards and diners across America — our troubled economy isn’t news. 600,000 Americans have lost their jobs since January. Paychecks are flat and home values are falling. It’s hard to pay for gas and groceries, and if you put it on a credit card, they’ve probably raised your rates. You’re paying more than ever for health insurance that covers less and less. This isn’t just a string of bad luck. The truth is that while you’ve been living up to your responsibilities, Washington has not. That’s why we need change. Real change. This is no ordinary time and it shouldn’t be an ordinary election. But much of this campaign has been consumed by petty attacks and distractions that have nothing to do with you or how we get America back on track.
"Here’s what I believe we need to do. Reform our tax system to give a $1,000 tax break to the middle class instead of showering more on oil companies and corporations that outsource our jobs. End the “anything goes” culture on Wall Street with real regulation that protects your investments and pensions. Fast track a plan for energy ‘made-in-America’ that will free us from our dependence on Mideast oil in 10 years and put millions of Americans to work. Crack down on lobbyists — once and for all — so their back room deal-making no longer drowns out the voices of the middle class and undermines our common interests as Americans. And yes, bring a responsible end to this war in Iraq so we stop spending billions each month rebuilding their country when we should be rebuilding ours.
"Doing these things won’t be easy. But we’re Americans. We’ve met tough challenges before. And we can again. I’m Barack Obama. I hope you’ll read my economic plan. I approved this message because bitter, partisan fights and outworn ideas of the left and the right won’t solve the problems we face today. But a new spirit of unity and shared responsibility will."
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
5 to 1 all McCain/Palin comment on is the word “bitter”.
Posted by: Danny | September 17, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Now THAT is a President.
Posted by: PJ | September 17, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Hoover
Reagan
Bush 2
So, NOW what do you want to do…
Remember the definition of insanity before you answer…
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 17, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Not a good ad. Too long… too scripted. Obama’s best ads are the ads that go directly to John McCain then highlighting his plan towards the end.
From the most recent ones the most effectives were the “No Maverick” (Decent ad), “Fundamentals” (GREAT ad), and “The McCain Gamble” (Good ad)
Posted by: Vanessa | September 17, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
WHERE IS THE OBAMA COMMERCIAL QUOTING MCCAIN SAYING:
“ECONOMICS IS NOT SOMETHING IVE UNDERSTOOD”
“WE’RE BETTER OFF THAN WE WERE 8 YEARS AGO”
JUXTAPOSED WITH WHAT IS GOING ON NOW ON WALL STREET????!!!!!
WHERE ARE THE OLD CLIPS OF HIM CALLING FOR DEREGULATION JUXTAPOSED WITH HIS CALL, NOW, FOR REGULATION???!!!!
OBAMA’S ADS SUCK….SOMEBODY, PLEASE GO AFTER MCCAIN WITH SOMETHING OTHER THAN THIS MILD RHETORIC
USE MCCAIN AGAINST MCCAIN….
Posted by: anon | September 17, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
“a new spirit of unity”?
If that’s what the past few days have been about – somebody needs to explain that phrase to Obama
Posted by: Barb in MN | September 17, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Lost a chunk of money along with a lot of Americans and McCain just keeps on lying with ease. McCain pushed through legislation sponsored by Sen. Phil Gramm, who is an economic adviser to his campaign. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act aimed to make the country’s financial institutions competitive by removing the Depression-era walls between banking, investment and insurance companies. hmmmm….. I wonder where the problem is? darn this financial crisis!
Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Vanessa,
He needs to kill the complaint about not giving specifics and economics is tough to do with a sound bite. I think you have to address the problem on both fronts.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 17, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Excellent ad. Draws you in, hits his points, stirs you at end.
Posted by: TNeedle | September 17, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
McCain received $117,500 from Lehman Bros.
Obama received $370,524
John McCain got $36,875 from AIG
Barack Obama GOT $75,899
Top Recipients of Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions, 1989-2008
1. Christopher Dodd (Chairman of Banking Committee) $165,400 in 15 years
2. Obama got $126,349 in 3 years!!
DO YOU THINK THEY EXPECT SOMETHING IN RETURN FROM MR. OBAMA? NO?
Posted by: Rick | September 17, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
PLEASE REMEMBER people. We were one people and one nation in the face of the outrage of 9/11. Every nation in the world stood by our side.
Then the REPUBLICANS decided we needed to have a war in Iraq. This is currently costing us $13 BILLION dollars a month, money which does NOTHING to educate our children to compete in a global economy, does NOTHING to fix our bridges so in need of repair that they are falling down, does NOTHING to change our economy to use domestically produced, renewable energy.
But the worst thing about the Iraq war is the way it divided American from American, and divided America from its allies.
You want different results? Hire different management!
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | September 17, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Wow! Brilliant. Thats what we want to hear.
Posted by: Peace | September 17, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Now THAT is a President.
_________________________________
So is Martin Sheen
Posted by: Emily Posted | September 17, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Anon and Vanessa are correct. Obama comes across as too cerebral and too wordy. I’d love to see an add along the lines of anon’s post — Obama needs to remind voters how out of touch McSame truly is.
Posted by: Alex | September 17, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
John McCain made his position CLEAR during his big speech on the economy in April.
The problem, according to John McCain was that there was TOO MUCH oversight over the reckless, stupid, dishonest dicisions of the banks and investment banks.
TOO MUCH OVERSIGHT? Now we are paying for a $85 BILLLLION bailout of AIG.
Because we followed John McCain’s policy of LOOK THE OTHER WAY.
But now, John McCain has reformed: himself. He wants to go back and “extend and revise” his history.
Or to be more blunt. John McCain has a lie to see you.
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | September 17, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Does anyone have better answers….?
NO…………..
Obama/Biden 2008
God help us if we don’t…
Posted by: forthegoodlife | September 17, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Obama certainly likes to hear himself speak but when it comes to actually pointing to his accomplishments to back up his words there is no evidence.
McCain 2008
Hillary 2012
Posted by: Ryan C | September 17, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Lez….this is too funny:
Part of the uncertainty in the markets is the risk that Obama could win and really mess everything up beyond repair.
How much worse can it get? Maybe a Depression?
Posted by: newvoter | September 17, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Ryan…what does he need accomplishments when he has a plan?
The only accomplishment I have seen Mccain have is the following:
The Keating Five were five United States Senators accused of corruption in 1989, igniting a major political scandal as part of the larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s. The five senators, Alan Cranston (D-CA), Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ), John Glenn (D-OH), John McCain (R-AZ), and Donald W. Riegle (D-MI), were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan Association, which was the target of an investigation by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB).
After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined in 1991 that Alan Cranston, Dennis DeConcini, and Donald Riegle had substantially and improperly interfered with the FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings. Senators John Glenn and John McCain were cleared of having acted improperly but were criticized for having exercised “poor judgment”.
Posted by: mainegirl | September 17, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
This is the same dolt lying yesterday about his involvement in the stimulus package. And Obama wasn’t even there to vote for the stimulus plan.
More words, just words from Mr Teleprompter Obama.
Posted by: Paige | September 17, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Alex…I guess you guys are punishing Obama for being intelligant verses Palin who calls her husband the ” first dude”.
Posted by: militarymom | September 17, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
He is ready to change this country and lead us in the right direction. This is the worse I’ve ever felt the economy. It’s hurting my own pocketbook. Something has got to be done and it looks like Obama is the only one stepping up to do it.
Posted by: TarHeel Mommy | September 17, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Hey Obama:
Did you save us a slice of cake from your $28,500 per person dinner with the ordinary hard-working Americans – your Hollywood friends from last night?
Posted by: Deb | September 17, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
vanessa…enough with the attacks…McCain can have that territory.
Obama accomplished his goal. He told us all straight out what his plan is…if you don’t like it, vote for McShame and 4 more years of the same.
I haven’t seen McShame give any plan yet, probably because he is following Bushes.
Posted by: newvoter | September 17, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Deb…that is how SMART people raise money. I think you and McCain are jealous. If these people want to attend this event, why not? They aren’t lobbyists like McCains doners….DAAAAA
Posted by: mainegirl | September 17, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Obama needs to look into the camera and explain why he uses the withdrawal of troops as a pawn to help his election.
How many times has he said on camera the surge will not work, has not worked.
Then when he tanks in the polls BO goes on O’Reilly and says it worked beyond their wildest dreams.
How can the troops trust this guy to be their Commander-In-Chief?
Posted by: harry | September 17, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
At least with a prerecorded ad, they could edit out all the ummms and uhhhhs so he doesn’t sound like a babbling rehab patient.
Posted by: Emm | September 17, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Democrats didn’t want oversight in 2003 when Bush recommeded it ….. they are responsbile for this mess….
from the NY times 9/11/03
The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago.
Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry.
The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios.
The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt — is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates.
This should have been a no-brainer, right? With hindsight, we can see that the Bush administration had accurately diagnosed the problem in the lending market and had a plan to address it. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reluctantly supported the plan. However, Democrats objected (emphases mine):
Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.
”These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” said Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee. ”The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”
Representative Melvin L. Watt, Democrat of North Carolina, agreed.
”I don’t see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing,” Mr. Watt said
Posted by: Gracie | September 17, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Barack Obama partied with Hollywood celebrities Tuesday night and with the help of Oscar-winning singer and actress Barbra Streisand raised an eye-popping $9 million for his presidential campaign and the Democratic Party.
The night was split into two glitzy events, a reception and dinner costing $28,500 each at the Greystone Mansion, followed by entertainment by Streisand at the nearby Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel. About 250-300 people were expected at the dinner and about 800 at the entertainment, which cost $2,500 a ticket.
Dinner guests seen by reporters, or noted by waiters, included Will Ferrell, Jodie Foster, Leonardo DiCaprio, Jamie Lee Curtis and DreamWorks founders Steven Spielberg, David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg
Earlier in the day, the Democratic presidential candidate spoke about the public’s deepening economic anxieties and portrayed Republican challenger John McCain as out of touch with the needs of hardworking people.
Then he flew to California for a night of hobnobbing with Hollywood notables.
Now THERE’S an out-of-touch elitist LIBERAL!
Posted by: geevill | September 17, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
John McCain’s economic policy: Whistle a happy tune and hope it all goes away!
Posted by: Rick | September 17, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Obama can say what he wants -
but it is still John McCain who invented the BlackBerry!
Want a senile nutcase for President? Vote McCain!
Posted by: Truth Matters | September 17, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
John McCain thinks that oversight means that regulators should overlook any wrongdoing on the part of Wall Street.
Posted by: Rick | September 17, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Words words words words words words
No Accomplishments.
Obama.
Posted by: Marcia | September 17, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Earlier in the day, the Democratic presidential candidate spoke about the public’s deepening economic anxieties and portrayed Republican challenger John McCain as out of touch with the needs of hardworking people.
Then he flew to California for a night of hobnobbing with Hollywood notables.
Can’t wait for the Ad!
Posted by: geevill | September 17, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Mccain mocks obama for his fundraiser last night, but he was at his own hollywood fundraiser just a few days ago
i mean if you want to belittle someone for something, dont you be doing it too…
thats just stupid… but his campaign has devolved into stupid
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
McCain attended a fundraiser at the Beverly Hills Hilton Monday night, which included a number of Hollywood Republicans, capping off a $4.7 million, two-event day in the Golden State.
The presumptive GOP nominee made little in the way of news in his remarks though he joked about his afternoon taping at the Tonight Show.
“I just came from taping the Jay Leno show so those of you that are up late tonight and don’t wish to watch any re-runs of the Democratic convention,” McCain said to laughter from the nearly 1,200 donors in the hotel ballroom. “So naturally we had to have a few age jokes and I told him that my Social Security number is 8. I am that old.”
And while Barack Obama has the majority of Hollywood backing his candidacy, McCain had his own small cadre of celebs in attendance tonight. Among those that were spotted:
Stephen Baldwin
Pat Boone
Wilford Brimley
Dean Cain
Jon Cryer
Robert Duvall
Angie Harmon
Patricia Heaton
Lorenzo Lamas
Craig T. Nelson
Gail O’Grady
Jason Sehorn
Gary Sinise
Jon Voight
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
“This is the same dolt lying yesterday about his involvement in the stimulus package. And Obama wasn’t even there to vote for the stimulus plan.
More words, just words from Mr Teleprompter Obama.”
He wasn’t there because he absentee voted a day earlier… do your research before believing distortions…
Posted by: roy | September 17, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
One reason our economy is bleeding, is mentioned, is Iraq-besides the failed policies. When you spend BILLIONS of dollars on it in just ONE MONTH, the money’s got to be coming from somewhere, no? Lots of investment that could have been used on the economy instead went to Iraq.
Look it up. We are also borrowing money from China to fund Iraq (because Bush wanted to wage a cheap war for American taxpayers), and there is good evidence that it is running into not billions, but trillions of dollars. They’re charging interest, and what’s going to happen when they finally ask for the bill?
EVEN IF you think that the US should stay in Iraq, we need to have the MEANS to do so. And that equals to having MONEY, aka a STRONG ECONOMY. Otherwise, who is going to pay for the taxes? Which means we had better overhaul the economy before fully breaks down-it’s already falling into pieces.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 17, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
geevil
do you think mccain was out of line for mocking obama for his fundraiser when he held one too just on monday?
id like to see his ad, because im going to love to see obamas counter ad to that
i mean can mccain afford to lie anymore inthis campaign?
what kind of president will he be if already hes lying to america… and not just stretching the truth out and out lies…
perhaps he shoudl ahve vetted palin a little better this troopergate scandal is not looking so good.
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Lehman Brothers collapse is traced back to Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, the two big mortgage banks that got a federal
bailout a few weeks ago.
Freddie and Fannie used huge lobbying budgets and political
contributions to keep regulators off their backs.
A group called the Center for Responsive Politics keeps
track of which politicians get Fannie and Freddie political
contributions. The top three U.S. senators getting big
Fannie and Freddie political bucks were Democrats and No. 2
is Sen. Barack Obama.
Now remember, he’s only been in the Senate four years,
but he still managed to grab the No. 2 spot ahead of John
Kerry — decades in the Senate — and Chris Dodd, who is
chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.
Fannie and Freddie have been creations of the congressional
Democrats and the Clinton White House, designed to make
mortgages available to more people and, as it turns out,
some people who couldn’t afford them.
Fannie and Freddie have also been places for big Washington
Democrats to go to work in the semi-private sector and
pocket millions. The Clinton administration’s White
House Budget Director Franklin Raines ran Fannie and
collected $50 million. Jamie Gorelick — Clinton Justice
Department official — worked for Fannie and took home $26
million. Big Democrat Jim Johnson, recently on Obama’s
VP search committee, has hauled in millions from his Fannie
Mae CEO job.
Now remember: Obama’s ads and stump speeches attack
McCain and Republican policies for the current financial
turmoil. It is demonstrably not Republican policy and worse,
it appears the man attacking McCain — Sen. Obama — was
at the head of the line when the piggies lined up at the
Fannie and Freddie trough for campaign bucks.
Sen. Barack Obama: No. 2 on the Fannie/Freddie list of
favored politicians after just four short years in the
Senate.
Next time you see that ad, you might notice he fails to
mention that part of the Fannie and Freddie problem.
Posted by: mom trying to raise citizens | September 17, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
BHO needs to come clean about why his stump speech on gun-control does not match his strict voting record.
Get your guns before Jan 20th–because Obama, Pelosi,Reid and a Democratic Congress will make it a whole lot harder to get one.
Don’t believe BO’s stump speech–check out his record.
Posted by: riley | September 17, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
enough with the sound bites. We need to see both candidates face off in debates so we can hear more of how they are going to perform the miracles they are throwing out there.
Posted by: Ron | September 17, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
There’s one real important thing here:
Senator Obama knows what he said yesterday, which means what he said yesterday is consistent with what he’s saying today.
Senator McCain is really weirded out. He’s not able to remember what happened yesterday in order to keep up with today. Or is it lying from one day to the next, not able to keep up with which lie is yesterday’s or today’s
However ABC has a headline today about McCain’s “shifting.”
Nah, it’s just plain lying.
Posted by: newz4i | September 17, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
MCCAIN WONT LET WHAT HIM AND HIS PARTY DID TO US THE LAST 8 YEARS HAPPEN AGAIN!!!!
WOOOOOOT
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
Obama’s plan:
-$1000 bribe to voters
-’Wall Street regulation’ (have I heard that before? and, how is he going to regulate the people that contribute the most to his campaign?)
-’Fast track energy made in America’ ( Drill, baby drill?)
-’Crack down’ on lobbyists (?)
-’Responsible’ end of war in Irak (?)
Sprinkle that with criticism of ‘outworn ideas of the LEFT and the right’ -I wonder whose outworn ideas is he talking about, his beloved Reagan or those dessastrous Clinton years?
Posted by: Rick | September 17, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Overall the add is a swing and a miss. Here we have a situation that Obama has been dreaming about (sadly), an economic crisis. He’s polling way ahead of McCain on economic issues. So what does he do? Dilutes the message by blathering on about big oil, mythical green energy jobs, the obligitory class warfare commentary and the Iraq war.
It’s the economy, stupid! I agree with Ryan C’s sentiments that Obama should be nailing McCain about his deregulation record when more regulation was needed. McCain is blaming Wall St. greed. Greed? Greed needs to be checked with regulation! You don’t give a pyromaniac a lit match and tell him not to start a fire! Americans would understand that. It’s the ultimate October surprise in September and Barack is blowing it. Instead he falls back on stump speech talking points. Who’s running the show there? This crisis was an 88 mph fastball right in Barack’s wheelhouse and he whiffed.
Posted by: Woody | September 17, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
I think the Union of Socialist Republicans may have something to say about this.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 17, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Personally, I’m not looking for a PR-focused president running the country from the Oval Office reading from a teleprompter. We need someone who knows how to reach across the aisle and get things done. Not a mere “willingness to work with others”.
Even the surrogates are having a hard time spinning the economy against McCain. They want to attack the “fundamentally strong” comment, like Reid began yesterday. But when you get to the point of calling today’s economy the equivalent of the Great Depression, it’s just fear tactics. And Reid backed off.
Let’s be real – times are tough. But the Great Depression was a result of the fed’s failure to recognize the emerging issues and act. Today’s fed has been more active – using whatever bullets they can find.
The Fannie/Freddie/AIG bailouts seem extreme – and they are. But ask yourself – would you rather the gov’t prop up the cornerstones of the housing and financial sectors or send you a check? Guess what – $1000 bucks in your pocket doesn’t mean much if 20% of the population is unemployed and the banks can’t extend credit to anyone.
The hubris of the housing bubble was not just the fault of the fed or Bush. Nobody held a gun to peoples’ heads to buy houses they couldn’t afford. Did the banks make it too easy? Absolutely. But do individuals have responsibility for their financial health? You bet. Recognize that the financial institutions have a history of being accused (sometimes correctly) of ‘redlining’ or discriminating against geographic areas populated by lower income or ethnic groups. You might say they went overboard in crafting products to expand homeownership to these underserved groups. They looked the other way too often – and people kept signing up for loans they could barely afford. And the investors bought the loans on the secondary market. There’s plenty of blame to go around.
Posted by: FishMonger | September 17, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
contributions to a candidate have nothing to do with this market crisis
so you republicans trying to spin that, go look at your boy mccain and ask him what contribution his man phil gramm has had in this collapse
and then look at how the bush economic philosophy has allowed this to happen
mccain is a deregulater remember?
he said so himself,
you cant just suddenly one day wake up and say, i am now this kind of person and i absolve myself of my party and all my previous votes and am now a reform change agent
thsi is pathetic,
THIS IS THE REPUBLICANS FAULTS, THIS IS JOHN MCCAINS FAULT, THIS IS HIS GOOD BUDDIE PHIL GRAMMS FAULT
This has nothign to do with campaign contributions
here is a shovel i suggest you start digging your way out
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
You can look up Obama’s record in the State Senate, and then the US Senate.
He has sponsored ethics reforms bills to cut wasteful spending. TheCoburn-Obama Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, for one, which he pushed and it became law. Look it up. He has sponsored hundreds of bills. Voting “present” is a tactic used by senators to indicate that they agree with the bills message but want it to be amended abit, rather than “no” which means completely rejecting the bill.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 17, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
rick
go ahead and tell me what john mccains proposal is
oh wait he wants a committee and hes going to get tough and lead
lol how pathetic mccain has no idea what hes doing, he cant even explain what his own committee (the commerce committee) does
oh he tried, but he failed…
and then a speech about sipc but explains it as s-pic and doesnt even get what that does right
hello fish out of water
teh gaffe a minute express is back on target!
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 17, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Bhrandon,
Take a deep breath. Contributions matter quite a bit with regards to public perception. If instituion X is corrupt, negligent or both and you take money from them, you’re guilty by association. That’s how it works in the political arena. Surely you know that by now. Furthermore, if your VP Selection Committee chairman is a former CEO of said institution X it makes your “agent of change” mantra almost laughable.
Posted by: Woody | September 17, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Ron -
The American people are brainwashed into thinking Socialism as a dirty word. Consider that a public library is a socialist system, public schools are a socialist tystem and I could go on.
Ron you need to find a better argument against Obama.
Posted by: Prometheus | September 17, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Earlier in the day, the Democratic presidential candidate spoke about the public’s deepening economic anxieties and portrayed Republican challenger John McCain as out of touch with the needs of hardworking people.
Then he flew to California for a night of hobnobbing with Hollywood notables.
Oh that Obama! #57 in a series.
Posted by: geevill | September 17, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
“contributions to a candidate have nothing to do with this market crisis”
I thought Obama got all his money throught $5 and $10 beer money donations from college students. Guess not huh!
Posted by: geevill | September 17, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
More BLAH BLAH BLAH talk from a Senator who does nothing but just talk and no action
Posted by: dan | September 17, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Obama is burning through his money like a drunken sailor. I wonder what it feels like to contribute to his campaign and then watch him waste all of your hard earned money.
Posted by: OxyCon | September 17, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Socialist policies, even then, are DIFFERENT from a socialist COUNTRY.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 17, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Everybody is loving this ad. It’s refreshing to have a candidate talk to me directly and treat me like an adult.
I hate it when candidates try to play me as a fool. I’d been tuning out but Obama makes me think it’s worth it to get involved again.
Well done, Mr. President.
Posted by: David | September 17, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
“I approved this message because bitter, partisan fights and outworn ideas of the left and the right won’t solve the problems we face today.”
Amen to that. At least now “he” gets it. The Spy Vs Spy comic strip IS more of the same and his own supporters are becoming his worst enemies in this election by continuing to spin up themes that divide us into elites and morons, whites and black, yadda yadda yadda.
Did you see the founder of AIG on GMA? He lost his entire net worth: 3 billion. As he says, he will get by but if you don’t think this economic tsunami isn’t dragging everyone in it’s wake, you aren’t thinking.
It’s time to get off the endorphin high, the addiction to rage and put down and talk to the problems. This election has come down to what less than 10% of the voters think and there is very little time left to talk sense to them.
So Obamabots, pay attention to what your candidate said. McCainiacs, pay attention to what Obama said. I know you both want to win but we’re melting down like the Wicked Witch of the West right now and there really are more important things than those dinners.
Posted by: len | September 17, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
you want the truth, i don’t think you liberal’s can handle the truth! rod blagovich(because he suck’s you dry) said in both his campaign’s for illinois govenor he would tax the rich and corporations, and give tax break’s to lower income and middle class family’s. only half of that is true! the part that is not true is that low income and middle class families did recieve high taxes on payroll, home ownership, tolls, etc… the fact is he taxed everybody! one of the main reason is for road constuction in chicago and it’s suburbs hoping for the bid of the 2016 olympics. he tax small busnesses and big corporation’s so high, that hundred’s of thousand’s of job’s were lost from companies closing, down sizing, or moving to nearby state’s or even out of the country! the downstate roads are freaking badly falling apart, while all the while chicago is under major roadway construction just hoping for the olympics to come to town. the budget for this construction is now way over budget now, and he’s finding new way’s to pay for it like more taxes, closing 22+ recreational parks, museum’s, prison’s in rual area’s with jobs lost from it, and moving the inmate’s to more overcrowded prison’s and newly built prison’s around higher population’s in suburb’s. this man does not even live in the gov. mansion which still has staff workers(maids, cooks,etc..) working there and he does not even live there, and 95% of the time he stays at his chicago suburb home having tax payers pay for his housing bills, food, and transportation by which he uses an helicopter to fly back and forth from chicago to springfield! the down state voters freaking hate this man for what he’s doing to this state and especially the farmer’s, by which this state produces more corn than any other state. what does that mean? higher taxes on the farmers, and with fuel and gas prices that’s not good for their pocket book! this is a huge union state and the union might not care, but the union workers do and they are pissed! a large majority of them for the first time in their lives will be voting for McCain/Palin. what does this have to do with obama you say? how about obama and blagovich are friends and both have ties with rezko and ayers along with other higher up business ceo’s around chicago that for some reason were not harmed by his policies, hmm? illinois law makers are paid by taxpayers and spend all that time making legislation just to have blagovich rewrite the bill’s himself and you libs want to get on Gov. Palin for her govenorship style! my point is this, if his polices go south and needs more money he taxes everbody except his elite’s in chicago that seem’s to never be harmed in anyway, and also to let you know, he is also being investigated for corruption and never answers any question’s ever to anybody, even authorities. sounds really familiar to somebody else, does it not? even when obama voted present 132 times in the illinois senate, his policies were exactly in line with blagovich and agreed what the govenor was doing the right thing for the state. if obama would have ever voted, blagovich’s polices would show you exactly how obama operates and what type of record he would have, smart man as you libs say. how did blagovich get reelected you asked, he put blame on President Bush and the illinois republican congress, sounds familiar! the state as a whole, republican, independent, and democrat, other than chicago, are pissed like you would not believe. you want to know how obama is going to run this country, look at illinois, because obama’s idea’s are exactly the same as blagovich. McCain/Palin
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I’m having a sixth sense moment: I see teleprompters!
Posted by: ad | September 17, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
HERE’S THE TRUTH! Obama makes no bones about his plans to go on a tax rampage. Not only would he increase the capital-gains tax rate from 15 percent to as much as 28 percent, he wants to allow the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts to expire in 2010, which effectively raises taxes on Americans by tens of billions of dollars.
He also wants to do away with the $102,000 FICA payroll tax cap, which means anyone making over $102,000 would pay an additional 7 percent in taxes on earned income. SCARY!
Posted by: Alexa | September 17, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
bingo, you wanna know more, just research illinois democrat official’s to see who he’ agree’s with and is in bed with! exactly the same polices! my state is being destroyed by the chicago liberal democrats, and where is obama from, hhmmm!
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
seem to me that only 1 political party has left the country with a surplus since 1980…
and..
it’s NOT the Republicans…….
Posted by: Jazzman | September 17, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Alexa,
One thing I know is that people who write “THE TRUTH” with caps lock activated aren’t telling it.
According to the Tax Policy Center, only families earning more than $600.000/year would see their taxes increase under Obama’ plan. That is the richest 1% of the population. Most Americans would get a tax cut. Under McCain’s plan, the top 1% would get a 4% tax cut while ordinary Americans would be left with nothing.
Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 17, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
“Not only would he increase the capital-gains tax rate from 15 percent to as much as 28 percent,”
His plan calls for raising the rate from 15% to 20% for those making 250K+
“he wants to allow the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts to expire in 2010,”
Actually he wants to repeal the Bush tax cut for the highest income bracket. He will leave in place all the other income brackets even cut their taxes further. He also proposes a reforming of the estate tax going with a 45% tax rate (it was 55% pre Bush) with exemptions up to $3.5M (married couples up to $7M).
“which effectively raises taxes on Americans by tens of billions of dollars.”
Our budget deficit is $400B.
Our taxes are going up regardless.
“He also wants to do away with the $102,000 FICA payroll tax cap, which means anyone making over $102,000 would pay an additional 7 percent in taxes on earned income.”
Obama plan calls for a 4% payroll tax on earnings over $200K. Currently the tax is not collected on any earnings over $102K.
“SCARY!”
Yes I agree. Lying Republicans are scary.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 17, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
el pajaro – correction! obama will give tax cuts to people who make $75,000 or less, will not raise taxes on people who make $200,000 to $250,000 or less. so his plans for that so-called 1% is actually at $250,000 or more. but what you fail to understand is that small business’s will be taxed along with big corporation’s. small business that create most of the jobs % wise will be tax and from the bottom to top, which starts at $50,000 to $1.5 million. that’s a big gap between number’s. the fact is that people with lower income may benifit, but their employer’s will pay literaly the price for his plans. take a look at his business proposal’s and not just the personal, because that’s what really matter’s, JOBS!!!
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
“Obama is burning through his money like a drunken sailor.”
Obama’s ground operation is already paid for and up and running.
The RNC and McCain are scrambling to get their in place in time.
That pop you hear in the background is the Palin bubble bursting in the polls.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 17, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
“small business that create most of the jobs % wise will be tax and from the bottom to top”
If you’re discussing payroll tax, that only kicks in after $200K and if your paying people $200K a year(beyond yourself), your company is probably not a small business.
From their website
Barack Obama and Joe Biden will eliminate all capital gains taxes on start-up and small businesses to encourage innovation and job creation. Obama and Biden will also support small business owners by providing a $500 “Making Work Pay” tax credit to almost every worker in America. Self-employed small business owners pay both the employee and the employer side of the payroll tax, and this measure will reduce the burdens of this double taxation.
They also seek to get small business a health care tax credit.
That is a huge chuck of overhead for small business.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 17, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“Not only would he increase the capital-gains tax rate from 15 percent to as much as 28 percent,”
The capital gains tax is set to expire in 2009 by a sunset provision.
Doesn’t matter who is in office, the law was written for the short term, but most experts feel it will be renewed no matter who is elected.
Someone with a basic knowledge of tax should know that. I am afraid to read the rest of your argument as you seems misinformed
Posted by: Citizen | September 17, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
jazzman – correction, we had a surplus the made in part of president clinton and the republican controlled congress came to the middle to get that done which is what McCain will do but will have problem’s with the left not wanting too. obama will not come to the middle which is why he is hoping to have a democratic congress so he can implement liberal, not democratic, polices! clinton did that to cover-up all his shortcomings by making people who prospered then not care because things were getting better, not great. that surplus was only going to be there if polices coencided with the policies inacted, by which the war’s and the recession before bush came into office did not make that happen. come back to reality!
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
citizen – it’s not just capital gain’s when it comes to taxes, with obama there will be even more and higher. it’s more about reality and commonsense than just knowledge. that sounds like booksmart comments and not reality of what is going to happen if obama is elected, those are just dreams in people’s head’s.
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Ruth Marcus:
“Ideological differences aside, John McCain’s campaign has been more dishonest, more unfair, more — to use a word that resonates with McCain — dishonorable than Barack Obama’s.
McCain’s transgressions, though, are of a different magnitude. His whoppers are bigger; there are more of them. He — the easy out would be to say “his campaign” — has been misleading, and at times has outright lied, about his opponent.
He has misrepresented — that’s the charitable verb — his vice presidential nominee’s record. Called on these fouls, he has denied and repeated them. “
Posted by: Rex | September 17, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Obama is the only one who has actually proposed policies that make sense.
He proposed plans last year to start bringing some of the wild west atmosphere of Wall Street CDOs and Credit Default Swaps under control. McCain hasn’t published one page of what he intends to do to regulate Wall Street. He doesn’t even know the issues involved. That’s why he wants a commission to study what everyone else with basic financial literacy and who have been paying attention the past 2 years knows about the problems with Wall Street.
McCain as president would have to be about the riskiest thing this country could do, besides re-electing George Bush for a 3rd term.
Posted by: Bud | September 17, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
ryan c – then were is your number’s of when gross stops before your not considerd small anymore? don’t forget, you have all kinds of taxes from employee, insurance, shops(more acres = higher taxes), epuipment bought and insured, plus high fuel and gas prices bring even more of a burden. so i guess you think it’s not a small business over a million dollars gross. the payroll is a small part of that! start adding taxes to reality and you might figure it out. to high and to many tax’s make profit a drop in the bucket, so how can small companies grow with your number’s?
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
timmaaa7 |:
It was Clinton who ran the ‘show’…
just like Bush & Cheney have run it for the last 8 years.
I do not share your assessment that McCain will be a panacea of ‘good tidings to all’ and fair play.
Your concept of McCain is one of a man that may have once thought that way, but, that man, no longer exists. One need only to asses the the endless streams of easily prove lies that come out of McCain. He and Palin repeat lies, and everyone knows it.
McCain & Co. are now interfering with a state investigation that was instituted by – 8 – Republicans and 4 Democrats… just like bush & Cheney, … why do they fear an investigation that Palin herself was in favor of before she was nominated for V.P.?
Republicans are always big on the LAW, until it has to be applied to them, then they do everything they can to hinder and subvert legal investigations… they use Bush & Cheney as their prime models for avoiding reponsibility and accountability.
Posted by: Jazzman | September 17, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
BTW:
Rex’s post below put’s it quite well……
Posted by: j | September 17, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
bud – proposed! that’s it! he got nothing done, nor did he even try working with the repubican’s. he still has no record of getting thing’s done in the u.s. or illinois senate or even organizing. he proposes but never finishes, just like the tax rebate’s bill he claim’s he started, but he did’nt even vote!
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
rex – do research on the state of illinois which he represent’s or even ask the it’s citizen’s about his policies and his past, his proposal’s are just the same as the illinois govenors and my state is in shambles because of it. democrats here hate both, period! the rest of the country might love him, but his own state does not. why do you think you hardly ever see him in illinois campaigning? he only come’s back to go home to his family?
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
jazzman – the democrats would not work with the bush adminstration, in large part the are not over the 2000 election. you wanna talk about repubicans philabustering here lately, that’s what the democrats did till the gained power in 2007. let’s see, 7yrs of democratic philibustering and 1 1/2 years of republican philibustering! i wonder?
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
timmaaa7
I’m glad you don’t disagree with the main point and tenor of the post, that being… the McCain and Palin campaign’s blatant dishonesty.
Looks like a McCain economic advisor, with all respect to Elvis… ‘has left the building’.
“Fiorina was booked for several TV interviews over the next few days, …. Those interviews have been canceled.”
Posted by: Rex | September 17, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
jazzman – obama will soon be apart of one to with the illinois govenor rod blagoivich. he’s also tied to rezko and ayers and is now under investigation and is also friends with obama. policies and ties don’t lie!
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
timmaaa7:
Clinton running the show = surplus
Bush & Cheney running the show = massive deficits and near bankrupt economy
“facts are stubborn things”
Posted by: Jazzman | September 17, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
rex – what tv or radio station’s are those, liberal? msnbc made a fool of themselves with her interview! you will see her on foxnews! i don’t care about you thinking i don’t disagree with you about lies, but with your statements, you don’t see what i’m saying about obama. both campaign’s at some point lie, but obama’a past and policies are way more questionable and worse for this country, you must understand that.
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
timmaaa7:
re: “rezko and ayers and is now under investigation”
your right, ..
REZKO is under investigation….Obama is NOT
Ayers is whatever you would like him to be, but.
Obama is NOT being investigated for anything with regard to Ayers.
You can imagine anything to justify your position but that doesn’t make them true..
“facts are stubborn things”
Posted by: Jazzman | September 17, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
jazzman – it’s all about working together, period!
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
timmaaa7
re:
“rex – what tv or radio station’s are those, liberal?”
no, they’re the ones that actually ask almost real questions…unlike Faux ‘News’
re: … “but obama’s past”..
why don’t you share with everyone your unbiased and extensive knowledge of ‘Obama’s Past’..
Posted by: Rex | September 17, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
jazzman – read my post again to understand what i’m saying, obama and blagoivich are under investigation’s because of connection’s and corruption within the state of illinois, tied to rezko, ayers, and other’s authorities have not mentioned due to the investigation’s. it’s funny, because those are fact’s, so whose stubborn now. your liberal media buddies are not reporting that so they can keep a lid on the situation for now. it’s already been reported on foxnews but info is limited due to the investigation, just wait!!!
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
rex – their the one’s who ALMOST ask real question’s, lol! foxnews report’s fact’s and truth 100% of the time in their report’s and interview’s. you making that statement is all i needed to know, lol! read my posts again about obama’s past in illinois and do real research about illinois legislature facts and event’s. you liberal’s keep leaving illinois past with obama out of the equation.
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
“obama and blagoivich are under investigation”
Obama is not under investigation.
The only person under investigation on either ticket is Palin.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 17, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
ryan c – shows what you know about illinois politics. his housing scandal with rezko is only the begining.
Posted by: timmaaa7 | September 17, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
timmaaa7
re:
“foxnews report’s fact’s and truth 100% of the time in their report’s and interview’s.”
OK,, I think I’ll let everyone here who reads your statement come to their own conclusion as to the veracity, accuracy and rumor mongering displayed by Faux ‘News’ …..
re: “so they can keep a lid on the situation for now”
ahhhhh, I understand… you have ‘secret insider’ information… I hope that you also have the secret truth decoder ring. It’s all a media conspiracy to keep Republicans out of power…
Who is it again that’s been running the government for the last 8 years? .. oh yeah.. Bush & Cheney. Republicans are scared even to mention that they are Republicans.
Like Ryan said, Palin is the only person now under investigation…… although, with some time and a democratic win….. you might just yet get see some investigations, probably not the ones you were anticipating.
Posted by: Rex | September 17, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
“That pop you hear in the background is the Palin bubble bursting in the polls.”
You’re not running against Palin except in your own minds. Women seem to freak the Obama camp out. I still don’t get that.
What you hear in the background is 401ks melting down among the Boomers who are just about to need them.
If Obama continues to issue ads talking about pulling together in English, and then in Spanish, ads falsely linking McCain to Limbaugh, etc., at some point the hypocrisy of the first message will be so obvious he will not be able to recover.
Beating up Palin in the sexist way that has been done for the last two weeks will get you a little relief from the pressure particularly given the financial fears, but it will take very little to push it back the other way.
Caveat vendor, Ryan.
Posted by: len | September 17, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
THE TRUTH HURTS, DOESN’T IT!!!!
Posted by: MEW | September 17, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
Loved the ad!
Obama has the youth and intelligence to lead this country forward.
He also has the experience. Meaning, he knows what poverty feels like. Not just because he was exposed to it as a child but because he worked daily with poor people for 3 years in South Chicago.
I trust him more to look out for the little guy.
Posted by: cincyr | September 17, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Two minutes of nothing. Typical Obama. Talk and talk and talk and say absolutely nothing.
Posted by: EyeDoc | September 17, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
At last, an effective and substantive ad from the Obama campaign. This one is a very powerful and direct appeal to intelligent independent voters. This is also a good time to be running it, as the McCain/Palin campaign is foundering trying to formulate a response to the financial meltdown.
Posted by: Pacific moderate | September 17, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
It is no coincidence that the SEC ruled to stop naked short selling two days after Lehman filed for bankruptcy protection and the day after AIG was crushed. The only thing we’re waiting for now is to see which of Bush’s chronies emerges as the winner of all these stolen companies.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 18, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am