Obama’s Shrinking Map

Gosh, that’s terrible news. Guess they’ll have to rev up their astroturfing campaign some more.
The spirit of liberalism visits The One in the middle of the night….
“Mr. Obama, I’d like you to meet some friends of mine..this is McGovern, and over here is Dukakis, and before you go, meet Gore and Kerry, and be sure to check in with Stevenson and Carter before you go back to the Il. Senate. Maybe you haven’t heard, but no liberal has ever won the white house without being a centrist…which is why we’ve lost 7 out of the last 10 elections.
Good night, and good luck, sir!”

A crowd of 60,000 came to hear Sarah Palin speak in Florida on Sunday.
No rock band as an intro.
No 6 million dollar Greek Temple.
No free beer and T-Shirts.
Just a woman with a record that proves she is for the people. They know she is one of them–not a snob that just pretends to be.

I think people are alittle tired of being called racist if they disagree with BHO.
Even if he had lily white skin there are plenty of reasons not to trust or vote for Obama.
Many of us think Obama is the racist.
Why else would he spend 20 years with one of the biggest racist of all–Rev Wright?

Cindy -
I thought that was 6 million people in freezing weather. You better check your facts.
She’s one of them, alright, and so are you.

Cynics got their hopes up AGAIN, only to be coused with cold water AGAIN.
Electoral Votes Final:
300-312 – OBAMA
226-238 – MCCAIN
270 – TO WIN
For those who prefer facts over fantasy, the preliminary electoral numbers are clear in that this will be a massive landslide by Obama.
The states that Obama already has securely within his grasp give him a preliminary total today of 223 electoral votes, and that doesn’t include CO, NEV, OH, MI, VA, PA or FL. Considering the reality of this, it’s quite likely that he will win FL, CO, VA and either MI or OH. Nevada is clearly leaning towards Obama, but it’s only 5 electoral votes and he doesn’t really need the state. All Obama really needs is 3 out of the 10 battleground states to win the election and it looks like he’ll win at least 6 of the 10 EASY. Virginia? Obama. Colorado? Obama. Florida? Obama. Michigan? Obama. The reality is, Obama is very strong in all of these states and with McCain giving up a major gaff every other day, if not every day, he’s sealing an Obama victory.
McCain has to win 9 out of 10 battleground states to keep the race close, and even the GOP’s best spinster cheerleaders know that’s not going to happen. For starters, he NEEDS to win FL, OH, MI, CO, PA and VA WITHOUT QUESTION, but the grim reality is that he’ll only win one. (Two with a miracle) I’ll be very nice and give McCain PA and OH, and even with those two states, he maxes out at 238 electoral votes. The facts show he’s not on solid ground in either one, so at best McCain can only acquire 245 electoral votes when 270 is the magic number. To top it off, start subtracting votes when Ron Paul pulls votes in Ohio and PA while Bob Barr pulls votes in GA from massive independent and Republican voters with at least 20%. Obama wins GA too? If he does, more doom for McCain. If he doesn’t, no big deal.
Now combine all of this with Democratic registration numbers increasing at a 4-1 rate over the Republicans in all battleground and current Red states. McCain might get 30% of the vote when this is over. It doesn’t look good for McCain at all, my friends.
THIS WILL BE A LANDSLIDE. That’s a fact.
OBAMA/BIDEN – ITS A LOCK

Call me bitter I don’t care.
The DNC and superdelegates blew it big time by supporting Obama.
Hillary is clearly the better candidate and would have been the first woman president. She wouldn’t kiss Pelosi’s butt so they backed puppetman BO.
If BHO loses I’ll come back to the Democrats in 2012 if Hillary is running.

look at the toss up states. MI/MI/WI.
Obama will behappy if he wins IL
McCain’08

Nat Turner – DREAM ON. You libs have NO IDEA what inductive or deductive reasoning is…. and are CERTAINLY IN DENIAL ABOUT WHAT IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING TO YOUR APPOINTED ONE. CHECK OUT LATEST RASMUSSEN and ZOGBY POLLINIG.

Seems like some of you may have a guilty conscience or something. Actually, I have not read a single study that says race will cost Obama the election. I have read one or two that raised that question. It is fairly obvious race is a factor (why else would McCain try to exploit it?). Also, many voters have directly said they will not vote for Obama because he is black (so much for the theory of those on here that this issue is made-up). Many people said so in West Virginia, for example. That’s not the question. The question is whether there are people saying they will vote for Obama who actually will not (the so-called Daly or Wilder effect). There has so far been no evidence of that (nor was there in the primaries or in the Congressional race in Tennessee last time). Those who won’t vote for Obama seem to say so, and if it is because of race, and they are not honest enough to admit that, they cover it in some other reason.

Temagami, I read the polls daily, and have tracked them personally through the last 3 presidential races. Zogby currently shows Obama leading McCain in the head to head 47% to 45%. The most recent Rasmussen polls show Obama ahead 46% to 45%. Both polls showed McCain ahead the last time they were published. All electoral map tracking polls show Obama ahead, and have done so for several months now. There was a dip on the polling numbers in the battleground states that paralled the dip in the tracking polls after the two conventions (due to the “bounce” McCain got becuase his convention was the later one). BUT as nearly all analysts predicted, that bounce has disappeared. The battleground tracking polls are a bit behind the daily trackin polls, but they show the same erosion in support for McCain. And while we are talking polls, not only are McCain’s numbers steadily dropping, so are Palin’s. That’s reality, whether or not you like it.

Maybe you haven’t heard, but no liberal has ever won the white house without being a centrist…which is why we’ve lost 7 out of the last 10 elections.
————————-
“Maybe you haven’t heard that no african american has ever been a nominee, Republicans have never put a woman on their ticket, and never before have this many NEW voters been registered to vote. All kinds of “firsts” going to happen this year.”
Mr Obama

AND.. now we find out that Obama’s Harvard tuition was at least in part paid for by an ADVISOR to the Saudi royal family, Khalid Al-Monsour, who at the time was also a front man for the Black Panthers. So wonderful!!

Cynics got their hopes up AGAIN, only to be SEVERELY doused with cold water AGAIN. When will you learn that donkeys are incapable of winning thoroughbred horse races?
Electoral Votes Final:
300-312 – OBAMA
226-238 – MCCAIN
270 – TO WIN
For those who prefer facts over fantasy, the preliminary electoral numbers are clear in that this will be a massive landslide by Obama.
The states that Obama already has securely within his grasp give him a preliminary total today of 223 electoral votes, and that doesn’t include CO, NEV, OH, MI, VA, PA or FL. Considering the reality of this, it’s quite likely that he will win FL, CO, VA and either MI or OH. Nevada is clearly leaning towards Obama, but it’s only 5 electoral votes and he doesn’t really need the state. All Obama really needs is 3 out of the 10 battleground states to win the election and it looks like he’ll win at least 6 of the 10 EASY. Virginia? Obama. Colorado? Obama. Florida? Obama. Michigan? Obama. The reality is, Obama is very strong in all of these states and with McCain giving up a major gaff every other day, if not every day, he’s sealing an Obama victory.
McCain has to win 9 out of 10 battleground states to keep the race close, and even the GOP’s best spinster cheerleaders know that’s not going to happen. For starters, he NEEDS to win FL, OH, MI, CO, PA and VA WITHOUT QUESTION, but the grim reality is that he’ll only win one. (Two with a miracle) I’ll be very nice and give McCain PA and OH, and even with those two states, he maxes out at 238 electoral votes. The facts show he’s not on solid ground in either one, so at best McCain can only acquire 245 electoral votes when 270 is the magic number. To top it off, start subtracting votes when Ron Paul pulls votes in Ohio and PA while Bob Barr pulls votes in GA from massive independent and Republican voters with at least 20%. Obama wins GA too? If he does, more doom for McCain. If he doesn’t, no big deal.
Now combine all of this with Democratic registration numbers increasing at a 4-1 rate over the Republicans in all battleground and current Red states. McCain might get 30% of the vote when this is over. It doesn’t look good for McCain at all, my friends.
THIS WILL BE A LANDSLIDE. That’s a fact.
OBAMA/BIDEN – ITS A LOCK

it has got to hurt that OBAMA’S MAP IN INDEED SHRINKING!!
————–
Hahahaha
Sure, Obama is “hurt” by that 5 point lead that gallop is showing and the declining support for McCain/Palin.
Ouch! No more please. We just can’t take winning. It hurts too much.
Yo guys are cracking me up with right wing “logic”.

The cynics a year ago standing in place on stilts in an African termite mound and now their down to standing on one half of one toothpick.
THIS IS GOING TO BE A LANDSLIDE.
Is rhetoric all you got?
Issues. McCain will be thoroughly SMASHED on them.
POTUS OBAMA – ITS A LOCK!

Wow, are any of you guys Karl Rove? We sure are seeing alot of “if you say it often enough it must be true.” No, McCain’s lead in Florida is shrinking (some polls show Florida a dead heat, and RCP just make it gray again, not red). Obama is ahead in some polls in Ohio, and those that show McCain with a lead have a small and shrinking lead. Virginia has more or less been a dead heat from the beginning. No significant shift there apart from a slight and temporary bump just after the conventions. I would also remind you all that Bush won Ohio in 2004 becuase the Republicans controlled the state and resorted to their usual funny business (under allocating voting machines in Democratic areas, closing polls early, mysterious malfunctions). The Democrats control most of the battleground states. There won’t be funny business this time around in those places.

Yavo Lem, those are old numbers.
[material snipped]
Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn
===========================================
Right, they are old, about 30 seconds old.

Here, I will post the latest numbers from RCP and invite everyone to go see for themselves:
Election 2008 Obama McCain Spread
RCP National Average 47.6 45.4 Obama +2.2
Favorable Ratings +17.4 +16.6 Obama +0.8
Intrade Market Odds 50.9 48.3 -
Electoral College Obama McCain Spread
RCP Electoral Count 202 189 Obama +13
No Toss Up States 273 265 Obama +8

I enjoy the attempts from the GOP rumor mill to try and create another “scandal” based on fabrications.
The only scandal being investigated now is the ABUSE OF POWER from the Republican VP nominee.
You know, the one that was requested by a BI-PARTISAN committee. The one the Gov said she wanted, but now has changed her mind since the facts came out. The one where her original explaination does not match the evidence. The one where she said she would co-operate and now supoenas are being ignored. The one McCain sent 30 lawyers to try and stall.
You know THAT scandal.
What happens when she is found guilty of abusing her power as governor? I guess you put your head in the sand and say it’s ok? It worked for Cheney and Bush, why not your nominee right?

Ripster, I already addressed that. I guess you missed it, so here it is again.
Seems like some of you may have a guilty conscience or something. Actually, I have not read a single study that says race will cost Obama the election. I have read one or two that raised that question. It is fairly obvious race is a factor (why else would McCain try to exploit it?). Also, many voters have directly said they will not vote for Obama because he is black (so much for the theory of those on here that this issue is made-up). Many people said so in West Virginia, for example. That’s not the question. The question is whether there are people saying they will vote for Obama who actually will not (the so-called Daly or Wilder effect). There has so far been no evidence of that (nor was there in the primaries or in the Congressional race in Tennessee last time). Those who won’t vote for Obama seem to say so, and if it is because of race, and they are not honest enough to admit that, they cover it in some other reason.

The intellect of the average American is just fine.
——————–
For Republicans, apparently it’s “just fine” for the candidates.
Bush, McCain, Palin…the meeting of mediocre minds
The “I like them, they’re just like me” mentality baffles me.
It’s time to let the smartest people lead for a change!

LOL, I cant believe that Obama has to compete at all! Seems lately anything McBush says is either made up as he goes along, or its an outright lie. based on that alone I cant imagine anyone with a single ounce of common sense support McBush.
Susan

Obama didn’t have the guts to clean up corruption in Chicago–probably because he was a part of it.
He can’t even clean up his own party now–leaving tax cheat Charlie Rangel in office.
The Democrats are trying now to add on to the bailout–BO votes with Pelosi, Reid, and Do-Nothing Democrats 97% of the time.

McCain needs to show ads with Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and ineffective Congress over and over again.
Remind voters that he sides with them 98% of the time and they have a 10% approval rating.
These are the people that will control the gov’t.

Why does it matter how close Alaska is to Russia? Bush proved you only have to look into their eyes and see their souls.

What other VP candidate could attract a crowd of 60,000?
Oh–Hillary Clinton.
And Obama didn’t have the backbone or enough sense to pick her.
He’s got ding dong Biden angering people by telling them to be patriotic and pay more taxes. While he barely gives 1% to charity.

Damehen,
You know the Republican party was the one who helped free your people? That MLK was a Republican? That the only KKK member in the Senate, Byrd, is a Dem?
That Democrats tried to block the Civil Rights Act? That hundreds of thousands of whites died to stop slavery?
Blacks tend to vote Democrat because they have become addicted to well intentioned social engineering gone wrong, foisted on them by liberal thinking…and it’s no small thing to blame Democrats for basically enslaving a couple generations to poverty, by not lifting them up out of it. Instead your party has handed them money, BILLIONS, in welfare, and kept them as a people largely in a state of infancy. Now many inner city blacks have forgotten job skills, or even that they need them at all.
It’s a tragedy.
Meanwhile, other recent immigrant groups, not addicted or used to government handouts, come here and flourish, like Vietnamese, Chinese, and Spanish speakers.
I don’t think that Americans are as racist as we’ve been led to believe. To me, if Obama loses, it proves once and for all that he was judged on the content of his character…and when you hang out with the likes of Wright, and Ayers, and Dorhn, you’re not presidential material.
As a conservative, there are many blacks I would vote for in a heartbeat, like Michael Steele, or Colon Powell, say.

The race is a dead heat, and Obama should be ahead by 15-20 points. If the race is a dead heat on November third and Obama ahead by 1 or 2 points, John McCain will win by a small margin a be our next President.

hippiechucker,
Who finally signed the Civil Rights Bill? Maybe Lyndon B Johnson? And he’s a Republican? JFK supported civil rights too as president. Is he Republican too?
Yes, a last timeit was the Republican Party that African-Americans voted, but since the Civil Rights Movement, there’s been a gradual shift.

I chose Obama over Hilliary because this country needed a change from the old gaurd. There are those who say they are willing to put up with four more years of republican rule in order to get their candidate Hilliary in next time, and those who won’t vote for Obama because of his race. Do you folks understand the ramifications if this race is lost to the republicans. A more conservative Supreme court and four more years of foreign and domestic policies that will ruin our country. Not only that, but the black vote which the democratic party has so relied on in the past will be disheartened and feel that their voice went unheard this election because we could not all rally behind our nominee. It will be a sad day in this country on Nov 5 if Obama loses narrowly because of racism and a vandetta. Something else to consider for those who are willing to vote for the otherside or not at all, come 2012, if Hillary does decide to run, do you honestly believe the blacks in this country will muster to support a party that didn’t rally behind Obama? Can you Hillary supporters win without the black vote? If you believe that you can then you are terribly mistaken.

Maybe Hillary can hire them for her 2012 bid that starts the day after the November election.
No wait…give it a week or so before Hillary starts her 2012 campaign. There has to be a week of raging mourning by the Democrats, followed by the Bill and Hillary re-taking control of the DNC.
Plus there is the ceremony at the Democrat Hall of Shame to add the bust of Obama to the other Democrats who did not understand the American voter – Kerry, Gore, Dukakis, McGovern, Carter…

I say McCain is well on his way to winning the Presidency. Is is a dead heat right now and after the debates when Obama ummms and ahhhs and stumbles, McCain will be ahead for good. If McCain wins any one of Michigan, Wisconsin or Minnesota, Obama is done.

“Obama didn’t have the guts to clean up corruption in Chicago–probably because he was a part of it.”

Grey,
Not arguing your point about there being Dems who supported civil rights, that’s obvious.
I was making the point that it has been the Democrats who were on the wrong side of racism historically, and who still are by misguidedly infantilizing the black community through social programs that encourage dependence.

I would, though, like to see the “Democrats” get rid of Reid, Pelosi and, especially, Dean.
———————–
Well as a Democrat voting for Obama, you have my support ejecting Pelosi and Reid. They’re both a waste of space as far as I’m concerned.
However, the disgruntled Hillary thing is a bit rediculous to me. My mother was a Hillary delegate in WA. She was upset when Hillary dropped out. However, she is fully aware that McCain and Palin do not in any way represent the policies or values that Hillary does. She’s supporting Obama now.
The influence over our Supreme Court and health care reform are enough reason NOT to vote for more Republicans. But there are dozens more.
More important to me is the fact the current administration has ###### on our Constitution and blatenetly put themselves above the law. They’ve lied to the American public to pursure their own agenda. They started a WAR under false pretenses. They’ve instilled knee jerk, or call it “don’t blink” if you prefer, foreign policy that has no purpose or clear cut mission.
How can ANYONE justify rewarding the very party that gave us the past eight years? If we don’t reject them now, what will prevent history from repeating itself? It’s like, “We can do whatever we want because as long as we wave a psuedo-patriotic flag every four years, they’ll vote for us again”.
McCain is no “maverick”. He has backed down and reversed his position on most of the issues that gave him that designation. (I actually thought he was a decent choice in 2000, but he’s NOT the same guy) He didn’t even pick his own running mate. McCain wanted Liberman, not Palin. He was TOLD to take Palin. He’s not standing up to anyone! He’s been SUCKING UP to get the nomination. And whoever is controlling the party now will be controlling the country if he gets elected.
Palin will do as told. She would never be the nominee otherwise. It’s certainly not based on credentials. Even Karl Rove said she was not picked based on ability, but rather for political reasons. And, Palin has proven that she prefers “secret” government over discloure. She apparently believes her political power is not subject to the law.
NO WAY WE SHOULD PUT A REPUBLICAN IN OFFICE. WE CANNOT REWARD THEM FOR GIVING US THE MOST CORRUPT ADMINISTRATION IN OVER 50 YEARS!

Paige,
I could equally argue that the 9% approval rating of Congress, who since Democrats have won control have passed the least amount of legislation,ever, would only be compounded by a Democratic president.
If people are crying out for Democratic governance, why the single digit poll numbers for you guys?

Lastest polls: Bush 2004 states
Colorado: Obama +10
Iowa: Obama +14
New Mexico: Obama +8
Tied Bush States (Bush margins in 2004)
Ohio: Obama +1
North Carolina: McCain +3 (Bush margin 12.4)
Virginia: McCain +2 (Bush margin 8.2)
Indiana: McCain +2 (Bush margin 20.7)
If Obama can maintain his ground game he can win NC, VI, OH, and IN.

No one sees Palin as dangerous except the extreme left and the Obama camp
———————-
Well being that the “Obama Camp” is 50% of America that says alot about her credibility doesn’t it?

People who argue that McCain should be President probably think George Bush discovered oil when he was in that business.

There are going to be a lot of angry , shocked and depressed people on November 5th, when Obama is trounced by John McCain. We will be here for all of you dispensing support and prozac.

I don’t think Palin has said anything I find dangerous. But I don’t speak in tongues.

Grey Matter – Actually heres is a fact about polls, since the majority of them do a disproportionate amount of Dems to Republicans it known that the Dems has to be up at least 20% at this time to make them feasible.
At this tiome in 2004 Kerry was ahead by 15 points, 2000 Gore by 12.
harry – you are so right, see with the liberal media it is not the actual issues, not is t with the Dems, see they think America wants Socialism, that we want to be like Europe!! So they do not understand!
We would not of broke away in 1776 if that was the case!!

Want to know someone with a good ground game? Bush. Here is a guy who ignored the memo “Al Qaeda determioned to strike in US” and yet was able to spend billions to create his own “Al Qaeda in Iraq.”

Yes, I acknowledge that it’s pretty unpredictable. There’re lots of new factors that are in play that have not in previous elections so there’s nothing to gauge against.
I support Obama, but I acknowledge it definitely isn’t a guarantee nor clear-cut who’s going to win. There’s still plenty of time for another game-changing factor to enter the race.

That’s Hurricane Sarah for you.

“There’s still plenty of time for another game-changing factor to enter the race.”
And that is keeping the entertainment quotient high.
Stepping back from partisanship, this is one of the best American elections in a very long time. Real issues, new candidates, lots of involvement by the grass roots, crises, last minute plot twists, great ratings.
What will next season’s arc be?

Of all the Bush 2004 states Obama will win Colorado, New Mexico, Iowa, Nevada and Ohio. Virginia has a REALLY good chance of turning blue.
Posted by: Vanessa
========================================
Vanessa:
According to RCP, the averages currently are:
Colorado (9) Obama +2.5
New Mexico (5) Obama +4.3
Iowa (7) Obama +9.2 (he did, however, have a 14 point lead
Nevada (5) McCain +1.7
Ohio (20) McCain +1.6
Virginia (13) McCain +2.0 (N.B. – Virginia is home to a lot of military)
Also, for your edification, between Nevada, Ohio and Virginia, there are 38 Electoral College votes at stake. Colorado, New Mexico and Iowa will yield only 21.
Do you see why Obama is sweating and telling his supporters to adopt an “in your face” approach to all their “friends, neighbors and associates”? If that is what they do, they are desperate, and if they continue to do that, in short order, they will not have very many “friends and associates” left, nor will their neighbors speak to them.
By the way, it would be really nice if Senator Obama would release his Illinois Senate records, his health records, his records from Columbia and Harvard, including his Senior Thesis or something similar (I have one, and I didn’t go to either Columbia or Harvard; and his wife has one), his actual Birth Certificate, with the required raised seal, and other normal documentation. As it is, all we have to go on are his two books, one speech, very little from his U.S. Senate time, and a lot of unanswered questions about some very shady relationships. Oh yes, we have a whole bunch of speechifying and hot air, but very little of substance.
We also have his Logan Act felony violation, which occurred when he, as a non-authorized person, attempted to interfere with the decisions of the elected government of Iraq, by requesting they delay acting on U.S. troop withdrawal schedules, until the next U.S. Administration is in place.

“Anyone who uses “The One” — a term from a slimy McCain ad — in reference to Obama, undermines their credibility as a serious thinker.”

“Stepping back from partisanship, this is one of the best American elections in a very long time. Real issues, new candidates, lots of involvement by the grass roots, crises, last minute plot twists, great ratings.”

OBAMA / BIDEN WILL WIN IN NOVEMBER SIMPLY BECAUSE MCCAIN & PALIN HAVE NOTHING TO OFFER THAT’S DIFFERENT THEN THE CURRENT REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT.. THE MCCAIN /PALIN CAMP HAS SAID NOTHING OF IMPORTANCE, THAT WILL HELP! PALIN WILL MAKE HISTORY AS:
THE 1ST REPUB VP NOMINEE
THE 2ND WOMAN VP NOMINEE
THE 3RD WOMAN TO LOSE..
MAYBE IN 4 MORE YEARS REPUBS.. NUFF SAID!

Once we “increase our standing in the world” we’ll see terror evaporate, right?
Well yes. When we stop ####### off countries, people like Osama who may be ###### at the US no matter what we do will find his support drying up, at least.

Or maybe this one:
“this is the moment, this is the time, when the rise of the oceans stopped, and the earth began to heal?”

If Obama’s performance in his last debate with Hillary is an indicator, he’s going to struggle with McCain, who is a horrible speech giver, but does well in debates.
———————
As a dem, I concede this point. Obama is not historically a good debater. He’s got a tough opponent in McCain.
However, I also ackowledge our “debates” are not really debates at all. They are just a chance to get the best 10 sec sound bite so it will get re-played on TV the next week.
Usually what we hear most about is a 10 sec sarcastic retort rather than policy issues.
But, that’s America.

“Maybe the reason they haven’t been able to do much is because a certain president keeps vetoing everything.”

Can any of you stay on topic?
I’m still waiting to hear from Howard Dean on the “50 State Plan.”
How’s that looking to you now Howard? Or was that just what you used to dump the qualified, competitive candidate?
We will remember in November.

excellent 3bluedudes site
Yah, I think I’ll wait to see that from someone a uh um uh a little, uh less, uh you know …. biased?
Thanks for the first Monday morning laugh!

Posted by: beebop | Sep 22, 2008 12:03:24 PM
sorry to condradict you, but i believe that was a “57 state plan”.

Economic Terrorism.
So…nobody wants to tackle why we were repeatedly attacked under Clinton?

“How’s that looking to you now Howard? Or was that just what you used to dump the qualified, competitive candidate?”

@grey matter:
The detail in Paulson’s plan that should catch our eye is the failure to pursue prosecution of executives who are getting golden parachutes for failure.
Obama is not wrong about wanting to do this right. His failure was to frame that inside an action announcement. Measured but sure if fine. Waiting to measure is not.
But if they think this is a bailout without consequences for the perpetrators, they might want to watch V for Vendetta. Obama’s campaign has been built on a promise not just of reform, but financed change. That financing just blew away like sugar on hot sand. Reform is all that’s left for the left.
We’re about to ride out a storm soaking wet with short rations and little rest. What we need most is a sure hand on the wheel or we get to see the deck from beneath the rudder.
Forget the rest of it. At this point, we’re trying to pick a Captain for this pirate ship. That’s all. The steadiest hand with the right charts wins.
ARGGHH!

beebop,
stop the paranoia. There’s nothing biased about 3bluedudes’ projection database.
The site itself currently projects a McCain win, so there you go. Just check it out, these guys do a serious job.

McCain is in all 50 states.

1972 re-do.

“2006 was one of the biggest Congressional reversals in history.”

I was at the rally for Palin. I am an Obama supporter. There was no 60,000 people at the rally is another one of Mccain’s campaign’s lies. I go to all my college football games and I know what 60,000 crowd looks like and this was not even close.

nina, you’re right. That’s why anothet official said that an estimate of 25,000 showed up.

Polls show that 15-20% of the voters who are voting for McCain have answered that they would not vote for anyone of color no matter what. This even includes a lot of the Democrats that were supporting Clinton. We’ve had Blacks, Hispanic, and Asians voting for White Caucasian candidates for years, but there is still a core of ignorant who only vote for whites, and none other. Sad isn’t it? Makes you wonder what went wrong and why so many still think this way. It must make McSame very proud that a goodly part of his core constituency is represented by these types of individuals.

“Polls show that 15-20% of the voters who are voting for McCain have answered that they would not vote for anyone of color no matter what.”
So we need a rock star who is an albino?
Johnny Winter for POTUS!

Well, Obama is definitely going to take NC. Polls are showing him tied, which means “winning.” And if you don’t think the McCain camp is feeling it, then note the fact that they’ve suddenly felt the need to open 20 new field offices in NC. I guess they’re finally realizing what the people of NC know: McCain has lost it.

Want to talk Liberalism? This comment board overwhelmingly writes about having a one-party system with no checks and balances, as we watch the world’s economy crumble in our own backyard; anyone here have perspective? Ever give any thought to why we have a 3-layered Constitution: Legislative, executive, and judicial. checks and balances. Ever hear the term? No matter how hard you may want Republican victory in the election, it sounds more like a Republican addiction. Like watching a bunch of crackheads who don’t know what happens when we all run like a herd over the cliff. Talk about liberalism.

It is true Barack Hussein Obama went to Harvard, but that does not entitle him to make disparaging remarks about the small town people of Pennsylvania and Ohio and Michigan. Who does he think he is?