Sep 1, 2008 1:48pm

Palin and Teen Pregnancy

Today's story on the pregnancy of Bristol Palin, 17-year-old daughter of Sarah Palin, raises a variety of hot-button social issues. As ever, it can help to cut though the inevitable rhetoric with some data.

A good place to start is the CDC's fact sheet on teen pregnancy:

-"About one-third of girls in the United States get pregnant before age 20."

-More than 80 percent of births in this group "were unintended, meaning they occurred sooner than desired or were not wanted at any time."

-"When teens give birth, their future prospects and those of their children decline. Teen mothers are less likely to complete high school and more likely to live in poverty than other teens. Pregnant teens aged 15–19 years are less likely to receive prenatal care and gain appropriate weight and more likely to smoke than pregnant women aged 20 years or older. These factors are also associated with poor birth outcomes."

Separately, in a report on 2002 data, the CDC said 7.6 percent of U.S. teenagers were pregnant in 2002, down from 11.7 percent in 1990.

Per that report: “Despite the continuous declines, the U.S. teenage pregnancy rate is still among the highest among industrialized nations. The costs of teenage childbearing in the United States are substantial. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy recently estimated that $9.1 billion in public funding was expended on teenage childbearing in 2004. These costs include public assistance, health care, child welfare, and other expenses."

In another CDC report, 46 percent of high-school girls reported having had sexual intercourse in 2002, rising from 27 percent of 9th graders to 66 percent of 12th graders.

Attitudinally, in a CDC survey of 15- to 44-year-olds in 2002, large majorities of men and women (78 and 85 percent, respectively) disagreed that it’s “all right for 16-year-olds to have sexual relations if they have strong affection for each other.” More said this was OK for 18-year-olds – 51 percent of women, 60 percent of men. The report notes that acceptability of sex among 18-year-olds was far lower among “people for whom religion was very important in their daily lives.”

And in an AP/Ipsos poll last October, Americans divided on the best way to reduce teen pregnancy. Fifty-one percent said it was by “emphasizing sex education and birth control”; 46 percent, “by emphasizing morality and abstinence.”

Lastly, we ourselves conducted a fascinating, in-depth survey on teens and sex several years back. It's clearly as relevant as ever, and you can read it here.

User Comments

Republican cover-ups, hypocrisy, and lies at its best. What a massive joke they have and are perpetrating on the unsuspecting and uninformed illiterate pop. And, they eat this up.
Too funny, if it weren’t so pathetic!

Posted by: Ellen | September 1, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

I know the Dems are going to have a field day with this, as if, nothing has ever happened like this in their families. Let him without sin cast the first stone, right? I applaud Palin for coming out so quickly and announcing this. She is a family person and problems happen. I know that Obama will not touch this, if he does, he will be skewered.
Thank you, Gov. Palin for coming forth with this information. I don’t see this changing voters minds of you, but actually, helping to solidfy the GOP vote even more because of your stance.
McCain/Palin 08!

Posted by: david from texas | September 1, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

That’s the real issue here, isn’t it? An impractical notion of sexual education that results in more teenage pregnancies and weddings surely can’t be liquidated as “a personal matter”.

Posted by: Marco | September 1, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

This is not a political issue, it is a family issue. Kids learn about safe sex early these days and a lot of them are going by the old “It won’t happen to me” idea. How skewered would her mom be if she went to have an abortion and the media found out? Would you rather her murder her baby so her mom didn’t have to deal with the backlash?

Posted by: Denise | September 1, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

Excellent satire David. I hope.
Yeah she’s a family person, that’s exactly why she doesn’t belong in the White House- she belongs at home helping her too young daughter raise a child without the pressures and humiliation of being in the public eye- not to mention her own responsibility to a 4 month old with Downs.
Wake up republicans, I’m an economic conservative with traditionalist values and I will not under any circumstances vote for the laughable duo that is McCain Palin.

Posted by: Reginald | September 1, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Senator Obama says that children are off limits in campaigns. Yes, that may be so. But a woman’s right to choose is not off limits. So I tell ya what: I’ll not pass judgement on the governor’s daughter, and the Republicans can keep their laws off my body. Sound like a deal?

Posted by: Victoria Pagan | September 1, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

I feel real sorry for this McCain dude. He has got Bush there, and now it’s Palin. Reminds me of Murphy’s Law.

Posted by: Sid | September 1, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

It is a sad turn of events and I agree that children should be off limits. It is important that the governor and her daughter deal with this matter privately as I am certain that all families would. No need to drag the Supreme Court into this…do we all agree?

Posted by: Tawanna Jones | September 1, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Exactly, Tawanna. Let’s not bring shame and undue social pressures to this poor young girl. Keep her out of the white house

Posted by: Reginald | September 1, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

McCain!!!!
There are plenty of more qualified female GOP members out there.
I want to vote for you but your health issues are a serious concern and this is a very stressful job for a 72 yr old.
Palin is way over her head…
Besides,the Republicans had 7 yrs to capture Bin Laden and couldn’t do that. He’s in a cave in Afghanistan and not in Iraq…time to give the Dems a shot at nailing him…

Posted by: Roger | September 1, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Teenage pregnancy is as old as man! Somewhere in everyone’s family tree we all have family members that has experience this. You deal with it and move on. But when you put yourself in a glasshouse by being holier than thou preaching abstinence only Education, Family Values,Pro-life,etc,etc. and your teenage daughter becomes pregnant then your hypocrisy come back too bite you in the ass. Now all of a sudden you want this to be a private matter…when you were so willing and able to tell others how to live their life’s. Its call HYPOCRISY! So remember this Sarah… If your gonna talk the talk you must try something NEW and walk the walk! Be a good Mother and Republican, RESIGN the VP pick and spare the Nation and your family from this NOW very public drama. Oh ya and John on your very first major decision your judgment SUCKS!!!

Posted by: GlassHouse | September 2, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

This will boost the popularity of McCain. Teenage pregnancy has touched many families in the US and will do so again with this matter. Watch out Obama this looks like a tropical storm but it’s really a typhoon…

Posted by: Martin | September 2, 2008, 6:08 am 6:08 am

i dont care about teen preg. but if thsi was obama,s daughter the republican slime machine would tear him apart. so we democrats should tear mccain apart.

Posted by: tom | September 2, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

The frustrating part about the Palin teen pregnancy admission is that it is a distraction from the real issues that need to be addressed in this election. When a major political party has no real platform to run on, they have always been masters at introducing irrelevant issues that galvanize their fundamental base. Personal politics aside, maybe the republicans should start considering how sex education actually helps teens make informed choices and prevent unwanted pregnancies. This would be a win/win situation for America’s youth, our educational prospects, and economy.

Posted by: Brian Hubbard | September 2, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am

I think it is so wrong for the media to make such a big deal over this pregnancy you would think she is the first person to ever be pregnant. Why don’t you mind your own business this woman never claimed to be perfect or to have perfect children. Maybe all of you who are without sin in their lives cast the first stone. The media has just gotten so out of control I hate to watch your shows anymore because of the way you treat people. Try putting your self in their place before you ask some of the stupid question you ask.You can run something into the ground so fast if you have to talk about others hardships do it once and drop it and you may find that more people watch your show because you care about people and not asking stupid question or running something into the ground. Maybe they should put some of your lives under a microscope and see how pur and holy your lives are.

Posted by: carol | September 2, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

It is none of the media’s business and certainly none of the public’s business, I am ashamed once again of the people in the country if they think it is ok to intrude on the lives of children. Shouldn’t this campaine be about the people who have chosen to run not their families.

Posted by: chris sicinski | September 2, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Teen pregnancy is the norm in most families today, but the statement that grated my heart was that the Palins are “proud” grandparents. I am proud of my daugther and pround of my grandchildren but, I wasn’t “proud” when I learned that my teenage daughter was pregnant. I took it as a pesonal failure on all levels. Sure; no question on the support factor, no question on standing by my daughter at any cost, but being proud of my grand child did not come until after the birth of the child. I think on a moral level the word proud should have been left off the speach. What message are you sending when you tell your child, I am proud of the situation – well heck, let me make you proud again, and agian, and again.
Jodie

Posted by: Jodie | September 2, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Must be a slow day in the political arena that the media has to focus on a 17-year-old girl. Why is this worthy of air time?

Posted by: carol | September 2, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

I agree with carol, leave the seventeen year old girl alone, and let start talking about the issue’s that matter in our world today, like healthcare, ecomony, the war. I believe this is a personal matter with in their family and that the whole country does not need to weigh in on it.

Posted by: Retha Jay | September 2, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

I am a high school teacher and mother of a nineteen year old daughter, and I agree with Brian’s comments. Education works better than a lack of it.
I also agree that the political issues
are what should be addrssed here.
Palin might be a wonderful mother(or not)but is she qualified to be the vice president, or possibly president, in the event McCain can not.

Posted by: Sandy | September 2, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Palin may be a good political candidate but how can a mother go off and leave her pregnant daughter when she is at a crucial time in her pregnancy and how can she leave her own 4 month old to go out and campaign. Her husband is a commercial fisherman and to my knowledge they are asea for long periods of time

Posted by: Barbara Shimp | September 2, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

It just beggars belief. Palin’s wishful thinking on teenage abstinence is undermined RIGHT UNDER HER NOSE, and she tries to present it as some sort of “Mission Accomplished”.
Does she think we’re all idiots? Or deaf?

Posted by: Scotty | September 2, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Oh for heaven’s sake….this is a teen age girl who made a mistake. Let us not forget that we had a Democratic President who had SEX with an intern while in office. HE CERTAINLY KNEW BETTER BUT STILL LIED ABOUT IT!!!! Neither is acceptable in the minds of some but it’s easier to forgive a teenage girl than a grown adult Man who is supposed to represent all of the USA. Let me say this….HE DID NOT REPRESENT MY VALUES!

Posted by: LHmom123 | September 2, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

First of all, it’s a shame that the face of Bristol Palin is being smeared all over the networks, while the young man who is EQUALLY responsible for this pregnancy hides anonymously in the shadows along with his family. Our news media is a twisted source of information, that preys on the weakness of our fellow man. This pregnancy has nothing to do with Palin’s qualifications for vice president. We should all be questioning the ethics of the media, who prefer cheesy sensationalism, instead of important issues. The sexual mishaps of young love have nothing to do with our Presidential campaign, and it’s pitiful that the media doesn’t realize this, and is allowed to continue with this type of reporting.

Posted by: Ann | September 2, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Carol,if this was Obama’s daughter having a child, you people would be making a huge deal out of it. To say that you wouldn’t is just a lie. and everyone knows it.

Posted by: Shelby jenkins | September 2, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

It is so funny the Dems are playing this up all the while, because of the Dems, we as tax payers are paying for and promoting non married women, reguardless of age, (who are illegal) to have babies. That’s right, illegal women get free health care and benefits for their babies and no one has any thing to say about it, from the dem side. It is only a talk point when they think it will help them.

Posted by: Doug | September 2, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

I wish more mothers would view there job of raising their children as an important career. I am not blaming Mrs. Paulin for her daughter’s situation, everyone makes their own choices and must live with them, but too many mothers have given up the fight to make a difference in our children. It is often easier to do other worthwhile things in this world, then it is to day after day put in the hours and work it requires to raise our children with values, morals and love that will help them become the people we hope will lead the next generation. Sadly we show our children every single day what is most important to us by our time and energy choices. I do not think that any woman trying to raise 5 children should have a stressful outside of the home, time consuming job–our children need us and most would tell you in a heartbeat that it is not the things that matter, it is the time and love shown to them that make them feel loved and important and you will never get second or third chances in that area! I hope the daughter will try to teach her child that.

Posted by: Shelly | September 2, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

When you preach Abstinence only Education, Family Values,Pro-life,etc,etc. and your teenage daughter becomes pregnant, it kinda proves to be a failed policy.

Posted by: Shelby jenkins | September 2, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I think it is hysterical to see the “family values” party scrambling to defend Palin and her daughter. I guess this is what happens when you teach an abstinence only based program. The child (Bristol) did not chose be in the spotlight, but her Mom knew exactly what was coming. Why did Mcain choose her again? I would think this was more funny, if I wasn’t so terrified that this woman might be in charge of our country someday.

Posted by: J Locke | September 2, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

WAKE UP AMERICA DO YOU REALIZE THIS 17 YEAR OLD IS HEARING, HOW BAD SOME PEOPLE THINK THIS IS, AND HOW SHE IS MAKING HER MOM LOOK BAD.
SHE IS HAVING A BABY, AND NOT SMOKING CRACK, OR HURTING PEOPLE.
SHE IS A KID AND TRYING TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT
THANK GOD SHE IS BEING HONEST, THANK GOD
I AM ALL FOR SARAH ,SHE IS REAL AND NOT F FAKE. GOD BLESS BRISTOL PRAYING SHE CCAN HANDLE THE PRESS AS BEING TEEN IS HARD ENOUGH.

Posted by: Annie | September 2, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

i think that bringing the daughter into all this is crazy. they need to focus on her ability to serve then to worry about her daughter. her daughter probably did it because her parents said not to or she did it because she wanted to knowing what the outcome could and did happen. the girl is 17 she made her decision. now she have to deal with it. so we need to again focus on who it going to be in the whitehouse

Posted by: Sherri Rex | September 2, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

The focus of this should be the issues.
Palin does not support sex education in schools, she supports an abstinence-only curriculum, apparently this doesn’t work all the time. If GOP can use her 17 year old and 4 month old they’ve made her positions fair game. Her positions and judgement are the issue, leave her children alone.

Posted by: Lisa | September 2, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

I agree with Senator Obama. The children of the candidates are off limits. Palin’s daughter and her pregnancy have nothing to do with this election. It is a non-issue! The only ones who will make it an issue or try to, will be…surprise, surprise…the media!

Posted by: Gabriel Feher | September 2, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Annie: I have to disagree. Bristol is not making her Mom look bad. Her Mom is making *herself* look bad by trying to spin this as some sort of triumph of muddle-headed “family values”. I’m sure Bristol is a great kid – it’s just her mom seems to be in denial and expects us all to join her there.
I’m all for family values myself, but it has to be underpinned with sense of realism and honesty. Palin’s gushing about how “proud” she is of her daughter seems fake. If it was my daughter, I’d kick her butt in private and maintain a suitably humble and embarrassed silence in public.

Posted by: Scotty | September 2, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I was a pregnant teen mom at 17 as well, and it is hard enough to deal with the shame and decisions that you have to make at that point without having others judge you so harshly! You people who are condemning her are ignorant. Have none of you made mistakes??? At least she is taking responsibility for her actions!
This should have no bearing on who should run for president and vp. Your focus as a voter should be on the actual issues, not on gossiping about a young girl! You should not be focusing on Palin’s ability to parent either because if she had been a man this wouldn’t even be an issue! Please stop being gossip-hounds and vote based on where the candidates stand on the issues and who you think would be the best one for the job!
(And I’m sorry but Gary Langer— I don’t know where you got your statistics, but I was a teen mom and I not only finished high school, but I also went on to college. And I knew a number of girls that were teen moms who went on to college as well.)

Posted by: Gwen | September 2, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

She should drop off the VP and stay home, watch for her family.

Posted by: Al | September 2, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Abstinence only education does not just tell students not to have sex. It explains the dangers of unprotected sex – unwanted pregancy and getting infected with STD’s. If the methods planned parenthood promotes are fail proof, why do we have students presented with that philosophy getting pregnant. Abstinence is a choice that is presented to students. The choice is still up to the individual.

Posted by: Mary | September 2, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

So funny that this is none of our business, private family matter, but Clinton’s private affair became a HUGE polital issue for Republicans. So hypocritical and two-faced. IF palin wanted to keep this private, she should never have agreed to run as McSame’s VP.

Posted by: diane | September 2, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Politics aside – I wonder what the discussion was in the Palin househould of the impact on their daughter before Sarah’s acceptance of the V.P. position. Surely they would have realized that this would expose her personal situation to the world. I have to wonder why parents would subject their child to this type of attention.

Posted by: Carol | September 2, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Guess that’s what “Family Values” means to a Republican—politics first, family last

Posted by: diane | September 2, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Since when is teen pregnancy “the norm” in families today? Seriously? Statistics say 1/3 of girls under 20 get pregnant. I wouldn’t call that “the norm”.
I was smart enough to wait until I could afford birth control before having sex. I knew, from the start, that I’d be on my own. Maybe that’s part of the problem. Parents are “babying” their kids too much. Where’s the downside if mommy and daddy help the 16-year old raise their kid?

Posted by: Marcia | September 2, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Teen pregnanacy is not a democrat or republican issue – it’s a teen issue. All mothers who have teens have to face this problem. Maybe the new VP does not believe in birth control and that won’t be good for her political future, however teens are getting pregnant. Is there someone to blame? Yea, maybe blame it on lack of parentig skills. I have asked my daughter to let me know when she needs to be on the pill (and I promised not to have a fit) but I always told her to be smart and wait for the right time/guy and she did. I would not consider this to be a political issue but yes this makes me question Sarah motherly skills.

Posted by: ex-dem | September 2, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Knowledge is power. Remember Roe v. Wade. Nuff’ said………

Posted by: dbos | September 2, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Mary – do you have kids?? Do you still believe in abstinenece? Today kids want to grow op fast – they know the risks but don’t care. Don’t forget teens view them-selfs as unvincible. If you have kids I beg you drop the abstinence theroy – it won’t work. I know teens who were tought the absitence by parents and church, were part of church groups and they were still into sex behind closed doors.

Posted by: ex-dem | September 2, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Did some digging. Newt Gingrich (Republican)…his mother was 16 when he was born. Bill Clinton (Democrat)…his mother believed the man she married was not the real father. Famous people born out of wedlock…Eric Clapton…his mother was only 16. Alexander Hamilton…first Secretary of the U.S. Treasury…Ella Fitzgerald…legendary jazz singer…Booker T. Washington…famous educator (born into slavery…father was white)…Oprah Winfrey…on & on. The point of all this? **** happens! Conditions may not be ideal when you enter this world…but it’s what you make it! Palin’s daughter’s pregnancy? Not even close to an issue.

Posted by: Gabriel Feher | September 2, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

I am sorry the Palin family had to go through all these. The issue shouldn’t be about the governor’s family, it should be more on McCain’s judgment. Looking back at his life style (as shown on CNN’s McCain Revealed) he has ALWAYS been reckless in dealing with life. For a 72 years man with three bouts of cancer, and he handing over the presidency to someone with so much problems in her family & lack of the necessary exposure to foreign situations depicts how McCain views life! Obviously, proper investigation was not done on the VP he selected. If this was the case with Obama, I am sure RNC operatives would jump over him (Obama) for such lack of judgment. And McCain wants to claim he has good judgment?

Posted by: Harry | September 2, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

ABC News, take a cue from Sen. Obama and please leave the 17 year old girl alone. GMA, Diane Sawyer cost you a long-time viewer this morning, me.

Posted by: Brad | September 2, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

WOW, we are all dwelling on what a 17 year old decided to do and not that we have to elect a president? If Hillary had been choosen to be VP would we be discussing Bill’s adventures in the Oval Office during his years in office. Thanks LHmom123 for your comments about Bill and what example he set for our teenagers as to how to conduct yourself as an adult. Not only as an adult but as President of the USA. How priceless! Now weren’t we suppose to be getting to know how the canidates are going to handle the everyday problems we face as individuals and a nation…(ie health care, the housing crisis, debt and the war)? May we get back to that and leave this issue with the family it affects?

Posted by: AC | September 2, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I think the reason why people are making a big deal of this is because republicans tend to promote Christian values and the pregnancy of an unwed teenager goes against these values. I realize society has made it more acceptable to have premarital sex, teen pregnancy and the list goes on, but you would have to agree that this does have to hypocrisy.

Posted by: Cris | September 2, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

How can she protect the moral values of our contry when she cannot control the morals of her own family.

Posted by: HC73 san diego | September 2, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

If Miss Palin were a young Hollywood darling instead of Gov. Palin’s daughter, all you people would be lavishing praise and adoration on her for her courage in rasing a child as a possible single parent. It is GOV PALIN running for office, and NOT her 17 year old daughter. I’d like to find one of your families that hasn’t had a unwed mother hidden somewhere! GO McCAIN & PALIN! Leave the children alone.

Posted by: CL | September 2, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

So Palin’s daughter is pregnant it is not like she is not going to finish school or have no one to help her so that she can. Look at all the girls who don’t finish High School and have kids living off the system. Give me a break. I agree with what one of the women in panel said that teenagers do not believe it will happen to them. I gave mine the opportunity to get condoms and bought them my daughter ended up pregnant and had an STD that couild have been prevented they do not believe it can happen to them.
It’s not the parents fault if the girl is pregnant everyone has a choice and now she has to live in with it. Tell the world FAMILY IS OFF LIMITS for a change. It’s Palin’s ability to do the job that should be important.

Posted by: Beth | September 2, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

Sure we all have someone in our family that is a teen or unwed parent, but that does not mean it’s right. In this case with Palin’s daughter and Hollywood celebrities they have the money and support to care for the kid, so many teen parents do not. I get so tired of seeing teen mothers and even some adults having kid after kid and just sitting home collecting checks from the government. I know teens will continue to have sex but there needs to be some way that it is not glamorized or looked at as the “okay” thing to do or at least have more emphasis on not getting pregnant until you can fully take responsibility kid.

Posted by: Cris | September 2, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

McCain has this Nomination about 2 to 3 months ago and if his team could
not do this simple investigation of Sarah Palin background how on earth can he run this Country as a President?
These
According to Republican close to the McCain campaign is quoted as saying ”They didn’t seriously consider her until four or five days from the time she was picked, before she was asked, maybe the Thursday or Friday before…This was really kind of rushed at the end, because John didn’t get what he wanted. He wanted to do Joe or Ridge.”, so what were they doing all this time? They are useless.

Posted by: Asare | September 2, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

It’s my personal opinion that the President and Vice-President of this Country should be held to the highest standard of intregrity. The question of a teenage pregnancy and other matters that have been exposed regarding Mrs. Palin, should have been studied further by the campaign. Why would Mrs. Palin put her family through this scrutnity. Also, What kind of a mixed message are we giving our teenagers. Just say its ok she’s pregnant but she’s getting married soon. Seems to me someone was too busy with her career and not paying attention at home and now it’s ok. What happens if Mr. McCain passes away during office, is this the type of individual we want running our Country. I’m sure it’s not the same being a Governor of a State as being president of The United States. She’s bright, very nice, nice family, etc. but CAN SHE LEAD our Country.

Posted by: RCobo | September 2, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I am very very afraid if this ticket has any chance of winning. Two loose cannons are not better than one when they are in charge of running the country.
As for the teen pregnancy. I side with the women who say she should never have agreed to run when she has 5 children–one baby with special needs and one 17 year old with a baby on the way. All of those kids need more attention than she will be able to give them. I am a feminist and I support women’s rights to choose in all areas and I wanted to be able to vote for Hillary. But this woman, despite the inexperience and sheer lack of interest in any foreign issues whatsoever, is not in any position to be taking on this job. I gave up opportunities for more status and money in positions that would require more of my time away from my children, especially when they were in junior high and showed signs of going down the wrong path. That is when kids need their parents around. There is no substitute for that. I’m sorry, but if you want to be one heartbeat away from the presidency, you should not have babies and pregnant teens at home. Furthermore, when your party makes an issue of such “family values” then yes, it is hypocritical to trot out the pregnant teen and make an example of her. Do they not see the absolute irony of it all???? Amazing!
And another thing, I think it is unconscionable that Ms. Palin has anything at all negative to say about Hillary or think for one minute that she is in the same category with her. Hillary has been at this on a national scale for many years and Ms. Palin has no idea!
God help us all.

Posted by: Linda | September 2, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Everyone needs to stay focused on the real issues of the canidates. First of all we are not electing a Pope. So get off the judgement stand. A 17 year old is responsible for themselves. People are people. Teenagers have been getting pregnant since who knows when. It was common place for 15-16 year olds to be married and raising their own kids for centuries. And no one is made to wear a letter A anymore. For the news media to pick up on this and try to make an issue of it, does not say much for the news media. The issues that should be brought up are the ones that will or do effect the running of this country. The issues such as foriegn policies, the war, our economy, health care and unemployment etc. I think Americans have a right to demand more from our news media if we wanted a gossip rag we could pick it up at the check out counter.

Posted by: AnnD52 | September 2, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

…terrorists, fuel costs, economic woes, trying to keep corporate policies (that cheat me out of money) away from the door…I do not have time to throw verbal or written stones at adolescents.
I think it is ludicrous to put the weight of the United States presidency on the shoulders of one single young person’s actions. As for her mom, which one of us, did NOT do something against our parents beliefs? Here’s your rockkkkkkkkk.

Posted by: Donna Morton | September 2, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Let’s stop fooling ourselves about this being a private family matter. Once she decided to accept the nomination, she new her family would be naked to the world. If it’s true, that Sarah and her Husband new about the Bristol’s pregnancy, than shame on them for making her the sacrificial lamb. If they wanted it to be a PRIVATE family matter, they should have ALL stayed home. How could she knowingly put Bristol and the boyfriend out there for the world to scrutinize? It’s their job as parents to protect her…not the Medias’.

Posted by: all4one | September 2, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

For all those who are saying this is a private issue and the dems are turning it into a political issue: you are missing the point that it is the republicans who have chosen to put private issues aka gay marriage, a woman’s right to chose, “family values” and keeping sex education out of schools, at the forefront of their polital agenda. The worst part about this scandal is that now every time Obaama is asked to speak on these issues which he has so eloquently done in the past, he will have to be extremely guarded lest he gets accused of making an underhanded refernce to Palin’s daughter. Oh, and one more thing, tell me, was this child out of wedlock planned or a “mistake”?

Posted by: keepin it real | September 2, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

There are much more importants thinks to pay atention! America’s trouble will not change if Palin’s daughter is pragnent or no!
Sara is human as anyone of us, she can’t live for her daughter: I don’t think she is the guilty.
What Sara Palin’s daugter does is her own problem.

Posted by: Renata Périco | September 2, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

This is a personal, family issue….just as abortion and gay marriage are. Until the Republicans take these issues off the “campaign agenda”, it makes all personal issues part of the “campaign agenda”. To make one silent but the others campaign vote getters is just wrong. So now, deal with the consequences or leave all personal issues off the campaign. Deal with the real issues, affordable health care, social security, and high inflation to name a few.

Posted by: Andrea | September 2, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Diane,
Calling what Bill Clinton did a private matter is laughable – he abused his power as president – in any company in America he would have been fired – he lied about the affair while under oath during a sexual harrassment lawsuit against him while he was Gov. of AK.
It’s just stupid to compare the two in any way.

Posted by: oldspice | September 2, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

I don’t think it is any of the media business. It is a family matter and should be kept out of the news.

Posted by: Marcia | September 2, 2008, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

McCain says that he was aware of this, so that means that he saw it as a means to rally the one issue “morality” voters. And to all of the people who say that it should be left out of the media, then Sarah should resign. She is just being used by the party and will be cast aside when she is no longer of any use. Obama is doing his best to take the high road, even though we all know that a Democratic family issue is always fair game for the repugnants…

Posted by: Sue | September 3, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

Right, I keep reading these stupid remarks by dems..talk about the pot calling the kettle black..well let’s line up the qualifications correctly and see how the tickets really should be. Obama has about as many qualifications for being President of the United States as Homer Simpson. What a joke. He has no executive experience whatsoever, he goes around saying he has headed up his presidential campaign, well blow me down..what a great reason for being president. He’s been a senator for less than 3 years and campaigned for president 2 of them, good choice..etc..etc. Oh yeah, he and Ayers organized some southside Chicago community clubs On the other hand, Palin has been elected to the highest office in Alaska, she has made many executive decisions, she has been in elected office for many years more than Obama.. etc..the actual campaign should be McCain ( Pres) / Palin ( VP ) against Biden ( Pres ) / Obama ( VP ), but then you would hear all this crazy chatter about how Obama is in NO WAY QUALIFIED TO TAKE OVER AS PRESIDENT if something happened to biden..I really think their best ticket would have been PELOSI / OBAMA ( since those two are the most liberal of the democratic party ).Talk about an inexperienced candidate being a heartbeat away from the highest office in the land, well on rhe Dems side, an totally inexperienced and way unqualified candidate is just a misguided Vote away from the highest office…and oh yeah, I will put Palin’s husband’s DUI up against Obama’s Cocaine and Marijuana use any time…let’s argue that point for a while..I also bet, Obama’s sealed college records will tell even more about this in the future..Why won’t he let us see them ? BY THE WAY, I AM A DEMOCRAT and DISGUSTED BY THIS JOKE BEING PLAYED BY OUR PARTY

Posted by: tom | September 3, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

SOOOOOOOO, Obama headed up his presidential campaign with NO HELP? That means that he writes all the checks and tracks all of the balances? Pleeease! ANYWAY………
Isn’t this a race between John McCain and Obama…?

Posted by: Ro | September 3, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

Sarah Palin said that she was proud that her daughter made the choice to keep her baby. All I want to say to her is isn’t she glad her daughter was able to make that choice? Under her policies, other women finding themselves in the same situation would not have much of a choice; and our country would have a new problem – record numbers of abandoned children that taxpayers would bear the responsibility for – not the women whose lack of choices brought those children into the world.

Posted by: Stephanie | September 4, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

this Bristol Palin is engaged to be married
Obama’s MOTHER was PREGNANT with him at 17!
WOMEN get pregnant each year on birth control! I have known many myself…
OBAMA and his LONG list of negatives and how the MEDIA trys to cover up, like the Rev Wright scandal, and as for JUDGMENT who WANTS someone that ANTI AMERICAN in office?
Obama has flipped on ALL issues he started out supporting INCLUDING an END to the WAR!
IN WAR one of TWO things happen: YOU win or you LOSE! When you admit defeat it only makes your enemies stronger!
OLD CHICAGO DIRTY POLITICS is NOT what we need to RUN this COUNTRY!

Posted by: Terri | September 4, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

Obviously Sarah Palin wasn’t as proud of her daughter or to be a grandparent as she stated or she wouldn’t have had her daughter using Trig to hide the pregnancy while they were on stage.

Posted by: Jean | September 4, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Palin manages a job and a family. I am sure that she did not raise her daughter to go out and do what she did,but you have to look at it like this. Palin is standing by her daughter. What do you out there expect her to do? It is my opinion that Palin is doing what she is suppose to do,keep her family a tight knit family. Things like this happen all the time and if it was a nobody no one would pay any attention. This is to all the women out there that disagree with Palin, how would you feel if someone told you “Because you are a wife and a mom you would be a terrible vice president.” You are women,moms,daughters,sisters,wives,companions. You,I hope,do most of the household duties. You multitask. I have to. I don’t have a maid to clean my house or an accountant to pay my bills on time or a nanny to raise my kids. I have faith that Palin will be able to do the job of vice president, and if you feel she can’t or isn’t then heres an idea:How about you pray for her that God will be by her side and will guide her.

Posted by: Marie | September 5, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

I’m a lawyer, a single parent, and would have been delighted to vote for a woman who shares my values. Sarah Palin clearly does not. Her extreme stances on abortion, drilling, wolf and bear hunts, and out God ordained right to be in Iraq are smack up against he right-most extremem of our policital continuum. And added to this is her demonstrated self-interest, putting her political aspirations above the needs of her daughter.
I would not put my 17 year old, 5 month pregant daugher on stage at the RNC. I would not have my 4 month old Downs child baby there in all of that noise. I would not have accepted the VP slot — I’ve turned down far lesser opportunities to be there for my one child. I felt so bad for Bristol, who put a brave face on this. And so disgusted at her parents — both of them — to put her in that postition. Palin’s policies would make all of our daughter’s ignorant and then, when pregancies happened (remember the “pretend you’re on a date with Jesus” mantra? but you’re not!), no choice. And no escape, for many many teenagers, from grinding poverty. It’s no fun being a single parent when you do have an education and economic means. I wouldn’t want to be there as a child, cut off from support. And many 17 year olds would not be supported by their right wing families. If this was not an annointed member of the Republican parties, the Palis would be getting bashed by the right wingers just as hard as did the Spears. Remember that? What hypocrites. Just another of the many blatant examples of hypocrisy of the Republican Party, as driven by the right-wing ultraconservatives.
McCain has created this distraction to win the ultraconservative vote and take the focus off the economy, which continues to nose dive. I have even stronger reasons to vote against him.

Posted by: Elle | September 5, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

Aug 4.2008
John McCain has lost the pep he had in his step earlier this yr. I wonder if he will be able to keep up the paste if elected president.WOW. Sarah Palin. the pick for a running mate, little to no experience, however, with all the hoop-la, one would think she will set the world on fire. Just think, a special need three month baby. A young special needs infant does need the full attention from the mother. Oh yes, the father. Mr. Mom doesn’t count too much I wonder what John McCain was thinking of. There were other very qualified females that would be suitable also. Well, get ready people, Obama for president whether you like him or not.

Posted by: Rose T. | September 5, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

What does Sarah think of the GOP Abstinence Program? Is the “First Dude” going to be a stay-at-home mom and take care of all the kids? They say he likes to fish a lot. Can she get a “leave of absence” as a VP to take care of emergencies at home and not have to worry about an emergency abroad? LOL with GOP women who think that she is going to save the party by upstaging McCain. In his younger days, he wouldn’t put up with her but in his old age he needs somebody to prop him up. She is going to be his Cheney telling him what to do as has happened to Bush.

Posted by: maximus | September 9, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Obamas own mum gave birth to him at 18, who cares?.

Posted by: Aden | September 12, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

Where is all the compassion and understanding the Democrats pretend to be so full of. Get off it … you’re simply.. just full of it. Sarah Palin will support McCain in cutting this overgrown Federal budget. She cut Alaska’s twice. It could only help the economy and democrats attack her for the purpose of trying to capture total power of the government and our lives. So far the Democratic congress has done nothing NOTHING for America. It’s the most stagnant most hated congress in American history. 9% approval rating. Like they say..staffers and close family relations..the rest of us don’t need another Democrat in charge of anything.

Posted by: Dropdeadgeorgeous | September 14, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Palin doesn’t care, unless she gets paid to. Her fanatical ways have not curbed coruption in Alaska at all, in fact she charges women money who have been raped. What if the poor girl couldn’t afford a rape kit. No investigation takes place. She needs to fix Alaska first then she can work on the other 49 states. Please tell her Russia is not in the United States. She needs to review her political stance again. Freedom of Choice is a Freedom.

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 18, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.