By Nitya

Sep 12, 2008 7:34am

Palin, Iraq and 9/11

The Washington Post this morning reports — in a story titled "Palin Links Iraq to 9/11, A View Discarded by Bush" — that, at her son’s troop deployment ceremony Thursday, Gov. Sarah Palin made remarks that seemed, to some, to directly link the 9/11 attacks to the war in Iraq.

"You’ll be there in service to the same cause of freedom from tyranny and from violence," Palin said. "You’ll be there to defend the innocent from enemies who planned and carried out and rejoiced in the deaths of thousands of Americans. You’ll be there because American can never go back to that false sense of security that came before September 11, 2001."

The McCain-Palin campaign says Palin was not saying Iraqis carried out the 9/11 attacks, but rather, that she was speaking generally of jihadis, Al Qaeda in Iraq as representative of a global ideology.

What do you think?

- jpt

User Comments

URGENT NEWS!!!
There is a Zoophile-Rights revolution under way in Europe and approaching our shores!
Can you imagine that?
There’s a Documentary about them, called COMING SOON, that’s streaming for free at
Watch it and do something before it’s too late!!!
G-d bless us all!!!

Posted by: Paul Mitchell | September 12, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

The problem with the Republican explanation of what Palin said is that al Queada and most of the jihadists were not in Iraq until we “freed” them and opened up the floodgates. I also have a question about the politicizing of her son’s deployment. Other politicians have son’s and daughters going to or in Iraq and they sent them off quietly, without fanfare. Palin obviously was trying to get the spotlight again and in doing so, she put her son and his fellow soldiers in grave danger. Our enemies now know what he looks like and his group’s identity. They are now major targets as the British Prince was after he was identified. Palin put her son at higher risk for political reasons and that means she will do anything to get elected. It’s shameful and shows that she places her political ambitions before anything else.

Posted by: alwriter60 | September 12, 2008, 7:52 am 7:52 am

Wow this woman is so much more than Obama and a bag of chips.
She makes Obama look like a first grader.
She should be President, she is sure and steadfast. It would take Obama all day to say what she did in 20 minutes!
You have my vote Sarah.
Tell charlie that Sarah can fly him to the tundra and shoot dinner for the media misogamists!

Posted by: HP Boston | September 12, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Moose in the headlights.
This woman scares the hell out of me. She was like a high school student failing and flailing for her oral exam because she tried cramming everything at the last minute.
Don’t we want the decision-maker to be smartest one in the room? A hockey mom is endearing, but lacks gravitas and the depth of knowledge to do more than rubber stamp her advisers.

Posted by: MikeNJ | September 12, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Sadam had nothing to do with 911 Bush told us he did McCain told us he did!
FOX news told us 27000 times it did it was a lie.
Al Qaida in Iraq has no links or ties to Al Qaida fact!
Al Qaida in Iraq is a term created by the Bush government to try to trick the American public into believing there is a link!
Department of defence information on : Al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI) is a group playing an active role in the Iraqi insurgency.
SO IT IS REALLY THE IRAQ FREEDOM FIGHTERS! JUST AS I WOULD FIGHT ANY NATION THAT INVADED OUR NATION!
AQI is one of Iraq’s most feared militant organisations and many experts regard it as the United States’ most formidable enemy in the country.
The UN say’s that the threat posed by AQI is exaggerated that a “heavy focus on al-Qaeda obscures a much more complicated situation on the ground.
AQI is in reality the Mujahideen Shura Council (MSC), in an attempt to unify Sunni insurgents in Iraq. However, its efforts to recruit Iraqi Sunni nationalists and secular groups were undermined by its violent tactics against civilians and its extreme Islamic fundamentalist doctrine. Because of these impediments, the attempt was largely unsuccessful.
According to both the July 2007 National Intelligence Estimate and the Defense Intelligence Agency reports AQI accounted for 15 percent of attacks in Iraq. However, the Congressional Research Service noted in its September 2007 report that attacks from al-Qaeda are less than two percent of the violence in Iraq and criticized the Bush administration’s statistics, noting that its false reporting of insurgency attacks as AQI attacks has increased since the “surge” operations began.
Al Qaida is not Al Qaida in Iraq.
Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaida was named “al-Qaida” in an executive order issued by President Bill Clinton in 1998. Al Qaida was realy a group called Maktab al-Khadamat.
ITs BS
We named all the Iraqi freedom fighters Al Qaida in Iraq. When the truth is these two groups have no ties!
Maktab al-Khidamat the real Al Qaida group was renamed by US Intelegence agencies to hide from the American people the fact that the US government trained and funded the group for the war against the Soviets in Afghanistan.
So most of the American public doesnt know we created the monster!
MAK maintained a close liaison with Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency through which the CIA funneled money and training to Osama bin Laden’s MAK for the Afghan war with the Russians.
Several former members of the “active service” of the CIA were employed and provided as “expert consultants” to Osama bin Laden’s MAK.

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

Jake, what do you think about the obvious. Was this line of Palin attack too lame for the Obama campaign itself so the Post picked it up? Jeez. This is up there with the lipstick episode so far as phoniness goes.

Posted by: Judasmac | September 12, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Does the Washington Post think Al Qaeda isn’t in Iraq? Do they think Islamic terrorists aren’t in Iraq? Do they think that retreating from an unstable Iraq is going to benefit America’s fight against Islamic extremism?
I realize WaPo is in the tank for Obama. But it’s quite a stretch to take from Palin’s remarks that Iraq was responsible for 9/11. I’d call it “silly season” but we’re talking about our National Security here.

Posted by: marylou | September 12, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

I have been watching and waiting to see what Palin would say when she was “away” from McCain influence( not that she hadn’t alreay had a version of the High School cram session).
I found her very likeable and pretty, but her answers just didn’t make sense.
She said her foreign policy experience was her many avenues of oil production in Alaska. WHAT!!! Does she know that oil has just one small part of foreign policy.
She seemed also to change her position on gobal warning. She said she NEVER stated that she didn’t believe in global warming, which of course she did.
The interview was VERY eye opening for me.

Posted by: perplexed | September 12, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Palin is an idealogist. It is really unfortunate to see her exploiting every misfortune of her children for political gains. The younger son with Dawn syndrome for pro-life propaganda, the pregnant teenage daughter for evangelical propaganda again and her son who has become a soldier because of his troubling behaviors. Palin’s political actions are indeed too low. God save America from McPalin.

Posted by: BKMC | September 12, 2008, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Palin was not trying to “get the spotlight”. As Governor, she’s CIC of Alaska’s National Guard. Deploying the troops is part of her duties. The fact that she’s now running for VP in no way affected her fulfilling those duties – she would have been there regardless.

Posted by: marylou | September 12, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am

I cannot believe that people really think this lady is presidential material. Yes, she is smart and can get things done, but her ego is above her own experience.
Why isn’t there more being brought out about her personal life ,church,family,reputaion. Everyone LOVED slamming Obama and now Biden!!! Do they consider her off limits because she is a women?

Posted by: thetruth | September 12, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am

Yikes! Yikes! Yikes!
This is serious.

Posted by: Sue T123 | September 12, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Hey ABC, why are you carrying this dishonest piece taking her out of context?
by the way, Saddam’s regime DID celebrate the 9-11 attacks and he painted a huge mural in celebration of them. That’s not opinion, it’s fact.
Thanks for more of the tired old pro Democrat drivvel we can expect of the MSM though.

Posted by: Mark E | September 12, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

marylou,
CIC of Alaska’s National Guard. Deploying the troops is part of her duties. ???
She has only ever “deployed the troops” to………….. a brush fire!

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

I think she did great. And what’s nice about the difference between her and Obama- she is authentic and true convictions. Obama’s “convictions” are up for sale to the highest bidder. He’s a shady guy with a lot of REALLY dangerous friends. Don’t forget that.

Posted by: Pete | September 12, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

“Liar, Krugman of NYT, blasts McCain With the Truth”
Republicans Hijacked 911, by Keith Olberman, Courage to Speak Truth!
How many more Journalists & Reporters will show courage and begin to do their duty and Inform the public as to truth and falsity? We should never again be lied into a False & Phony war by a President you want to have a beer with! Republicans strong on National Security? I don’t think so, after all 911 happened on their watch, but they have been allowed to distort the facts and public perception that it is the Democrats who are weak on national security! They have failed to properly enact the 911 Commissions recommendations which would make us a lot safer! Politicans who willfully and intentionally lie to the public are engaged in a betrayal of the public trust and such distortion should be deemed unethical and in some cases, criminal! We need a Media to be the third-wheel of democracy again and not a parrot of those who are corrupt, unless they are corrupt too!
Republicans are just as dismal on economics. It is an outrage or should be that the government can give millions of dollars to CEO’s from the failed Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac and yet, cannot give a second stimulus check to American citizens in these hard economic times? Republicans say No to a second stimulus while the Democrats say Yes to a second stimulus! Is the Republican Congress working for CEO’s or are they working for you, the people? We need a Government and a Congress to work for the People, not lie to the people, not bail out their own special interest groups and leave the people hanging. We need a government to put the burden of taxes on the rich where they belong and stop putting the tax burdens on the middle class and poor, those who can least afford it. We need a government who will put money into education and make that a national priority again, both lower and higher education and give more Pell Grants and less loans so that young people can once again achieve a higher education, get a good job and lift everybody up out of poverty. We need action and not more spin, talk and lies. We need a Congress who will vote Yes to bridges, roads, schools, health care. Who will invest in America and not in Iraq and in themselves and their special interest groups. America is dying. We need Change!

Posted by: Angellight | September 12, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Anne Kornblut has been slanted towards Obama since day 1. I’ve read lots of her columns. And her chats are the same. Everything about Obama is deferential.
I thought the Palin statement was about the most harmless, generalized statement one could make in the context. What was she supposed to say — “You’re going off to fight a war that we never should have started — so don’t get yourself killed?”

Posted by: katmandu | September 12, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Pete,
What are those convictions Palin has ?
When do/did they begin ?
Before being named VP she put out a press release supprting Obamas energy policy!
No shes against it!
Near the end of Dem nomination she said Baracks position on Pakastain was nuts!
Durring her interview she now supports Barack position.. So much she claims it as her own!
So again what are those covictions ?

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

WOW!!!!!
Is this a stupid statement:
“Al Qaida in Iraq has no links or ties to Al Qaida fact!”
If this individual would attempt to do the research, she would learn that Al Qaida in Iraq has direct ties to the Osama group. {{{shaking head}}}

Posted by: gtessex | September 12, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

She has no clue, problem is neither does MCCAIN or if he does, he is a LIAR
Actually FACT is McCain is a LIAR
We allowed LIES, SMEARS and SWIFTBOATING the last 2 elections to win and look what we got? President STUPID, no more STUPID
We need to take this country back
Obama 08

Posted by: McCain = BUSH = LIARS | September 12, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

katmandu
You wrote:
What was she supposed to say –”You’re going off to fight a war that we never should have started — so don’t get yourself killed?”
—————————
So you want your troops and the American people to be lied to by there leaders ??
You’re going off to fight a war that we never should have started — so don’t get yourself killed?”
Would at least be the truth!

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am

I saw Palin’s interview last night and I am begging John McCain to please get another running mate. This woman has no business being considered for the vp slot. She is a religious zealot and placing her on the ticket can be considered a threat to national security.

Posted by: James | September 12, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

HP…get off the cool-aid. We need a leader who knows what they are doing. Not one that holds up in a room for 4 days and gets versed on the issues….

Posted by: formerhillary | September 12, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am

kat..you don’t generalize when you’re going to be president…” yOU GET THE FACTS…

Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 8:25 am 8:25 am

you all should be very scared…ugh
I can’t believe you people…
this woman is not being elected to the head of the local “lets discuss world politivs” committee…which she would have failed at.
she is asking to be the person that is the back up to wade through all of this cr@p we are in
the person that would launch nuclear (or like bush “nucular” missiles)
She didn’t do okay…I a citizen would be more equipped to be Vice President than she is…
it is about basic knowledge of the problems we face…she is …there are no words to describe how underqualified and Bad this woman is.
and how bad John mcCain’s whacked judgment was that he would actually hire this woman.
Her record is overwhelmingly mixed in Alaska. In a time when the state is having a boom because of the oil industry.
so stop with how popular she is…she is popular because of huge oil windfalls affording the oil companies being okay with getting taxed more and the return flowing into her state.
This is not the local Town Board Chair…
this is the person who should hav eknown the Bush Doctirne…and the details of Israel…and the known what answering like that does to our job in the middle east peace process…and how it complicates it…
and ugh
this is ridiculous
that woman you saw last night …you really think she should be deciding if we go to war,
or deciding whether “nucular” missiles should be launched
or American commercial jetliners should be bshot down over NYC
Gov palin what if it were a Russian commercial airliner? or British? or Pakistani?
would you know the ramifications of such a choice?
you all should be feeling nauseous from that interview last night.
Absolutely ridiculous that that person on that interview …would be close to any position of leadership…never mind the Leader of the freakin free world…
like was said before…this is not some Disney movie.
jesu$ how stupid can we be for a third time.

Posted by: dl | September 12, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

“Cocky Wacko” with her hockey stick on the red button. Terrifying.
America is finished if she and The Joker win.

Posted by: susan | September 12, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

you she really confused. she has no knowledge for what she talking.She needs some extra classes to get her facts right

Posted by: kristk68 | September 12, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Alwriter60 wrote: “The problem with the Republican explanation of what Palin said is that al Queada and most of the jihadists were not in Iraq until we “freed” them and opened up the floodgates.”
Even if your statement was true, Gov. Palin is clearly talking to the troops in the present tense. And at the present time al Qaeda IS in Iraq.

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Deb, you wrote: “Bush told us he did McCain told us he did!”
THAT IS NOT TRUE! From the very beginning President Bush and Vice President Cheney said that while there may be links between Iraq and al Qaeda (the 9/11 Commission confirmed these links), there is NO evidence that Iraq or Saddam Hussein had anything to do with the attacks on 9/11.
Now as for al Qaeda being in Iraq prior to the invasion, the following is from the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, passed by Congress in October 2002: “Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;”
We didn’t invade Iraq for another 5 months!

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Peter…if you don’t think her convictions are up for sale, ask her about the” bridge to nowhere” or her dealing with her former brother in law.
She has changer several of her “convictions” since being named.

Posted by: thoughtful | September 12, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Misc ‘Odd’ Thoughts on ABC SP Interviews:
1) All of ABC staff invloved seem angry.
2) CG was not wearing a suit. A blazer is usually a sign of ‘informality’. And I don’t recall a single interview that he has conducted with the other candidates – the men – when he was not wearing a suit (if they were dressed ‘formally’). It is just a basic sign of respect.
3) SP spoke without saying ‘um/ ‘ah/ etc. Nice (wish I could do the same).
4) The presentation of the interview by ABC is not consistent. Every ABC program and ABC transcript that I have seen or read has some ‘variation’. And the editing does not appear to be in SP favor.
5) GMA used a ‘Fact Check’ segment after the interview was shown. I can not recall them ever doing that to the other candidates – especially right-on-the-heels of the interview, and using a ‘False stamp’. Also, I had the vague sense that the ABC facts were misleading (‘past VP candidates meeting Foreign Leaders’, Truman?).

Posted by: lucky | September 12, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

gtessex
Al Qaida in Iraq has no links or ties to Al Qaida..
ITS THE TRUTH!
Its even included in the in the testomony given to the US senate.
The fake link began with this statement:
Lieutenant Colonel Michael Donnelly “the tactics used in this attack are consistent with al-Qaeda.”
Never said anything about Al Qaeda being in iraq.
That was the birth of AQI it was picked up by the media and then used by the government.

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Sarah Palin seems to be pretty erratic on international politics. Could someone brief her on these subjects, asap? Maybe it would be easier and safer to change the Republican VP slot.

Posted by: erasmusx | September 12, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

This is the statement of the day:
how stupid can we be for a third time!
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Posted by: thoughtful | September 12, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Palin is correct.
After we invaded Iraq, al qaeda streamed into the country and made it their central fight against us.
However many al qaeda there were beforehand, and however significant or insignificant their numbers until then, that is who we are fighting in Iraq now
We’re not fighting the government or its military.
We’re no longer fighting the only large domestic militia which went up against us to any major degree (al sadr’s “mahdi army”).
We’re not fighting the Shi’ites, Sunis or Kurds individually.
With few exceptions, the only group we ARE fighting in Iraq is al qaeda and their adherents.
The effort of the Post and other media venues to take down Ms. Palin any way they can is remarkable. I’ve watched politics for 50 or so years and have never seen this immediate and this intense (and this dishonest) a series of attacks on one candidate in my life.
How bad is it? Here’s a great example:
Just prior to Barack Obama’s “pig in lipstick” insult, he lifted and used a statement from the political cartoonist for the Post, Tom Toles with no attribution at all.
Obama said, verbatim, that “John McCain says he’s about change too. And so I guess his whole angle is, Watch out George Bush. Except for economic policy, health care policy, tax policy, education policy, foreign policy and Karl Rove-style politics, we’re really gonna shake things up in Washington”
The verbatim words in the Toles cartoon, published almost a week before, are “Watch out Mr. Bush. With the exception of economic policy and energy policy and social issues and tax policy and foreign policy and supreme court appointments and Rove-style politics, we’re coming in their to shake things up”
That overt plagiarism from one of the paper’s most visible staff members doesn’t seem to bother the Post. But Sarah Palin noting that we fight al qaeda in Iraq does.
Then they wonder why people call them biased.

Posted by: Ken Berwitz | September 12, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am

Sarah Palin is not qualified to be in this race. Not that either one of the Presidential candidates are qualified either, but she seems to be desperate to appear to know what the answers are. She is not qualified, and I shudder to think that this great country is going to be swayed at all by her “presence” and ability to double speak. Think back to the polititians of just a few years ago and what our expectations were from them. When did the bar get lowered? How sad that we can be swayed by someone like this. McCain would have been better to choose Tom Ridge and deal with the abortion issue rather than trying the element of Sarah Palin

Posted by: PJ Guagliano | September 12, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am

Directlly RELATED to::9/11…I would accuse IRAQ of attempting to PROFIT by JIHAD–//..from reading media stories about the war(watching the Evening NEWS)..IRAQ would have attempted to re-create the extermination camps/..I don’t think that 9/11 was directly a LINK to::extermination..but maybe tied to a COST(suffered)by JIHAD..9/11 was a attempt to RING-a-BELL about JIHAD..and the COST-continues…IRAQ may have come too some POINT–that JIHAD might be turned into something else(many Islamic Believers)say that the war is evil…that’s about all that might explain IRAQ+JIHAD+others/[end]

Posted by: Mark S. M. | September 12, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

I was extremely disappointed in Charlie in the interview. I do not believe he would have treated Joe that way,firing repeated questions that had been answered. I might have to start watching another network for news.
As far as Palin, I think her answers were right on! If a country is our ally, they want the same things we want, terrorist removed from their country. As far as the Bush question; she is not Bush’s VP! Way to go Sarah . . . Obama couldn’t fight his way out of a paperbag, his answer would be “here”. Palin’s the kind of VP we need in this country, one who speaks up and gets the job done. She never answered “here” in her interview, but that was the answer Charlie was looking for. Terrorism is a real threat to any way of life that differs from an extremists, Palin is different and the extremist are out to get her. America should be tired of the same old same old. Palin is for America, America the way it used to be before America became run by big business. She even took big business on and won. Palin America’s next VP! God Blessed America and will do it again . . .

Posted by: Jill | September 12, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

so palin is in agreement with war with russia over georgia——-all i can say is -HELL NO I WONT GO—–stay home and build a bunker—–the woman is a true —

Posted by: rodney | September 12, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

The interview was pretty bad. I now understand their reasoning for keeping her hidden.
You know it’s bad when the Republicans come out in great numbers calling the media bias blah blah blah.
Watching her interview with Gibson and Biden’s interview on Meet the Press (Biden was asked harder questions)I don’t see how she’ll face up against Biden.

Posted by: Vanessa | September 12, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

There was no Al Qaeda in Iraq
when Saddam ruled. Al Qaeda
came in after our occupation.

Posted by: anon | September 12, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

If Sarah Palin can be VP and President, so do 50 millions americans. She is a hockey mom. Outside the pipeline and the big oil $$$, she has no vision. And please, don’t speak about sexism here. Mc Cain team has not properly vetted her, so don’t blame the press to do the job. She is not prepared. She must attend the Lieberman foreign policy scool for one month or two.
And don’t let influence by the phony propaganda of the GOP. After voting 2 times for Bush, the republicans have no more lessons to give.

Posted by: Fred | September 12, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

During the Cold War the two
sides were more or less evenly
matched militarily.
The Russians say that Gorbachev
was assured by us and NATO that
there would be no NATO expansion
east of West Germany once the
Russians pulled out of eastern
Europe. They say that the West
has broken its word.
Bush-McCain thinking goes like
this. During the Cold War it
used to be:
(USA + NATO) vs (Russia + Warsaw Pact)
Now if we bring in most, if not
all, of the republics of the USSR
into NATO, the military forces
would look like this:
(USA + NATO + most former USSR republics) versus (Russia)
This forever establishes our
military dominance over Russia.
Bush and McCain think that in
any military conflict like the
one that just ended in Georgia
the the entire might of the
new Western alliance would be
lined up against Russia.
Bush and McCain will start a war
assuming only the best possible
outcome in our favor.
Think about it:
Nobody gave Vietnam a chance
against the mighty USA.
Bush and McCain told us Iraq
would be easy.
Now the military brass are
telling us that an eventual
victory in Afghanistan is
not a guaranteed thing.
The consequences of increasing
tensions and a potential
military confronation with
Russia are highly unpredictable.

Posted by: anon | September 12, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am

Keep talking Palin. you’re in the big league now. We don’t pet and hold up our leaders as victims hiding from your own people.

Posted by: watching | September 12, 2008, 8:39 am 8:39 am

I reiterate:
The Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, passed by Congress in October 2002: “Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq;”
That was 5 months before we went into Iraq.

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

I am an independent and have been undecided. After watching the interview with Palin, I can say now that I have decided. John McCain’s lacks the judgment to be President. The Vice President is the President of the Senate. This Vice Presidential pick of John McCain’s lacks the background to sit in that seat and make these deciding votes. John McCain has not picked someone who would be ready to lead this country or speak for this country around the world.
I have decided to vote for Obama-Biden.
Thank you ABC.
DecidedthatMcCainlacksjudgment

Posted by: Margaret Chesney | September 12, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Deb,
I am not going to waste my time posting links to prove my point. If you wanna believe their is no connection between Al Qaeda in Iraq and the Osama group…then their is little I can do to change your mind.
Just think for a minute back when civilians where being killed by the dozens…almost daily in Iraq by Al Qaeda. Over time that threat has been reduced drastically. Messages from Al Qaeda within Iraq to Osama’s number 2 have been intercepted. So the connection does exist.
Have a good day…I can’t stand the hysteria and stupidity I am reading here today over Palin by the naive, the ignorant, the stupid, Moonbats, Bush haters and other Far Left groups who obviously care little about the facts and the future of their country.

Posted by: gtessex | September 12, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am

If Palin thinks that 9/11 is the reason for Iraq War than she knows NOTHING.

Posted by: Angela | September 12, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

LETS GET BACK TO WAR IN IRAQ—-HOW MANY YEARS AGO WE WERE TOLD WE WON ?—-NOW WE ARE STILL THERE –WHY?—-WHY IS china GETTING OIL OUT OF IRAQ—A COMMUNIST COUNTRY IS REAPING THE SPOILS OUT OF IRAQ—OUR GOVERNMENT IS LIKE A MAD DOG WITH NO END IN SIGHT , AND WE HAVE GENIUSES THAT WANT TO START MORE—AS FOR MCCAIN AND PALIN –HE HAS PROVEN THAT HE HAS NO SENSE AT ALL –AND PALIN HAS VERY LITTLE IN THE LINE OF BRAINS.

Posted by: rodney | September 12, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

jill
you are blind.
Biden answered tougher questions on Meet the Press, Obama answered MUCH tougher questiions on O’Riley
they have been in tough debates and interviews for 19 months.
THIS WAS HER FIRST INTERVIEW! and rather than admit the truth attack Gibson-pathetic. The big bad barracuda is such a victim. give me a break!

Posted by: votor | September 12, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am

Sarah Palin is a joke !!! Wake up American. This woman has traveled to Canada and Mexico prior to her trip to Iraq on last year!!!!! Because Russia is Alaska’s next door neighbor, does that give you any foreign policy experience or knowledge. We are all doomed if this extremist is elected as VP.

Posted by: Wanda Mack | September 12, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

the Bush administration forged a letter purporting to show a link between Saddam Hussein’s regime and al Qaeda as a justification for the Iraq war.
“The White House had concocted a fake letter from Habbush to Saddam, backdated to July 1, 2001,” Suskind wrote. “It said that 9/11 ringleader Mohammad Atta had actually trained for his mission in Iraq thus showing, finally, that there was an operational link between Saddam and al Qaeda, something the vice-president’s office had been pressing CIA to prove since 9/11 as a justification to invade Iraq. There is no link.” From – The Way of the World by Ron Suskind

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

That’s a stretch. If Palin said it was a nice day, liberals would say that she was taking antidepressives.
Palin will be ready on January 21. She doesn’t have to be ready before that.
That’s what matters.

Posted by: drjohn | September 12, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Do you think as VP or president the job will be easy? She couldn’t even respond correctly to the easy stuff.
She is totally out of her league…

Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

IF MCCAIN WINS —WE BETTER GET BACK TO BUILDING BUNKERS——AS FOR MCCAIN YOU NOW KNOW WHAT A —D —AVERAGE STUDENT IS REALLY LIKE—-DUMB—–

Posted by: rodney | September 12, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

voter…you are so right!!! You can bet Palin won’t be on O”Reilly….

Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

What do I think?
She is stupid.
She is “a machine playing A La Bush’s scenario”.
As for her – she does NOT think.
Seems, she does not know how.
“Street Smart” Liar – that what she is.
America is in Danger with this Moron on VP spot.

Posted by: Linda,Fl | September 12, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

Before anyone attacks Gibson on being bias and harsh, please look up Biden’s interview on Meet the Press this past Sunday. Biden went into the very specifics of our foreign affairs. Not his stump speech. Biden was asked hard questions on the surge etc No walk through the park.
Palin was asked questions I could answer. They weren’t hard at all. She’s unprepared… just admit it.
If you think she looks bad, wait till she debates Biden. Her inexperience will frighten you.
At the end of the day she’s the candidate you may like but not the leader you want.

Posted by: Vanessa | September 12, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

gtessex,
The daily bombing’s and killings you speak of were turff wars between the suni and the shia’s their common enemy was us. we invaded their nation.
What would you do ? Would you Fight for your freedom ? I would ?
DOD documents dont link QAI and Al Qaeda.
Because they are not the same group!
No conection!

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Palin was addressing her National Guard troops in present time. That “some would draw the conclusion” that she meant Iraq caused 9/11 is attributable to the number of straw-grasping moonbat leftists who will try anything to destroy this woman.

Posted by: marylou | September 12, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

That performance was canned and would be funny if not so bloody dire. McCain is far from the picture of healthm Thos woman looked like someone taking a her final poli sci 101 exam. If she passed with a C it would allow her to advance her meticulation. However is it too much to ask that we have a VP candidate actually understand nuance? She is on the job training for a job she MUST be fully prepared for. This is a sad joke on the people of America.

Posted by: Daniel Plainview | September 12, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

gtexxx…this kind of sums it up..
Palin : naive, the ignorant, the stupid.
I have been a Rep all my life. I NEVER liked McCain. I have waited to see whom he chose for this running mate.
For the first time in 60 years, I will vote Dem. Not especially for Obama/Biden but against a stupid party, the Reps.

Posted by: goforit | September 12, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

It’s plain and simple, she just doesn’t get it.
Like Bush and his war-mongering party, war is the solution to everything. Yesterday she talked about us going to war with Russia.
Palin, like Bush, is an End-of-Times believer, and the idea of war is mighty appealing to her. But not to me. If she wants end of times, she can burn her own house down.

Posted by: dav | September 12, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

mmm..er..mmm (blink blink)..what the question again?
what bush doctrine?
LOL !!
God save America

Posted by: eduardo | September 12, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

MCCAIN HAS SHOWN US WHAT DUMB AND DUMBER ARE ALL ABOUT-
THIS ONE IS A NO BRAINER IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD
GOODBY WORK TIME
SOMEONE HAS TO PAY FOR THESE WARS

Posted by: rodney | September 12, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Scmidt and Rove will attempt to spin out of this. They are hoping that the voters are going to buy the personality and appearance and not remember the issues. America is the attention span of a 30 second commercial. Ok the last time we went to the store the prices have gone up. Her action figure doll comes with a high price. War is not a game.
Over 70 retired generals and admirals have endorsed Obama/Biden ’08.
Hope and Change backed by strength. This is reassuring to the Voters.

Posted by: Cooday | September 12, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

What’s the difference between Cheney/Bush and Palin/McCain
LIPSTICK

Posted by: Omentum | September 12, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

As Senator Chaffee states Palin is whacky and cocky, sounds and looks like the present guy that is President. Scary to think of what she should become if they are elected

Posted by: john pinter | September 12, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

Having found no “collaborative relationship” is NOT the same as saying there are no links at all. The fact is that al Qaeda actually had a training camp in northern Iraq at least 6 months before the invasion.

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

It was a tough interview and Palin held her own.
What scares Obama supporters–if she can do that well on her first interview she will keep improving.
Obama has no record of anything except his two books and voting present 130 times.
Palin has a proven record of accomplishments.

Posted by: harry | September 12, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

What can I say?
Where is John McCain?

Posted by: Thinking | September 12, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

It’s pretty obvious how much Palin’s toughness scares Obama supporters.
They can’t even recognize a real answer because they are used to Obama dodging and stuttering and rambling on for five minutes.
He talks so long you are left thinking:
huh?
Palin did fine and will continue to improve–unlike BO who already thinks he knows everything.

Posted by: cindy in nc | September 12, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

LOL, Palin should spend a little less time talking trash and a little more time with her teenage daughter on the subject of BIRTH CONTROL! What a joke!
Jiss

Posted by: Jinsen Jones | September 12, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

It was refreshing to hear real answers rather than BO stuttering and dodging and rambling on for 5 minutes.
Palin did well and will keep improving.
Unlike BO who thinks he already knows everything.

Posted by: cindy in nc | September 12, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Sunday, September 07, 2008
10 Ways in Which Sarah Palin Is *Exactly* Like George W. Bush–or Goes Beyond Him
1) Like Bush, she is completely against a woman’s right to choose (in fact, she exceeds Bush in that she is against a woman’s right to choose even in cases of rape or incest;
2) Like Bush, she opposes stem cell research to prevent fatal diseases in men, women and children;
3) Like Bush, supports the teaching of Creationism alongside Evolution in public schools;
4) Like Bush, does not believe that Global Warming is man made;
5) Like Bush, has supported abstinence-only sex education methods that have proven ineffective;
6) Like Bush, has virtually no foreign policy experience prior to running for national office–
7) Like Bush, has engaged in conduct that has resulted in current government investigation of her actions;
8) Like Bush, has made statements which indicate lack of knowledge of basic elements of the office they are running for (Palin, July 2008: “What exactly does the Vice President do everyday?”);
9) Like Bush, has been sequestered to prevent her being asked questions that she has not yet been prepared to answer;
10) Like Bush, talks like a reformer–yet in her actions (i.e., relying on lobbying, supporting the Bridge to Nowhere before she was against it) acts in the most typical, all-too-familiar fashion.
BONUS! In a view that even Bush has discarded, Palin still links Iraq to 9-11.
Still willing to put her a heartbeat from the Presidency with a 72 year old candidate?
H/T: On The Issues

Posted by: Marie Stewart | September 12, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

“Palin did fine”
So why are the Republicans attacking Gibson and calling him bias. If she did “fine” the republicans would not attack Gibson, they would praise Palin’s name. The interview was horrible to say the least. Asked some of the easiest questions and she stumbled around.
If you want to see a hard press interview watch Biden on Meet the Press this past Sunday. You’ll hear hard questions and educated responses.

Posted by: Vanessa | September 12, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

James Danley
Having found no “collaborative relationship” is NOT the same as saying there are no links at all. The fact is that al Qaeda actually had a training camp in northern Iraq at least 6 months before the invasion.
————————————–
The fact is the story your pushing have been proved to be a lie.. The traing camps which as the story goes was used to train 9/11 ringleader Mohammad Atta never existed it a lie…
The White House had concocted a fake letter from Habbush to Saddam, backdated to July 1, 2001,” Suskind wrote. “It said that 9/11 ringleader Mohammad Atta had actually trained for his mission in Iraq thus showing, finally, that there was an operational link between Saddam and al Qaeda, something the vice-president’s office had been pressing CIA to prove since 9/11 as a justification to invade Iraq. There is no link.” From – The Way of the World by Ron Suskind

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Obama supporters are just worried that McCain will win and they won’t get BO’s
government handouts.
McCain a hero to taxpayers.
Obama hostile to taxpayers.

Posted by: riley | September 12, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

cindy in nc
It’s pretty obvious how much Palin’s toughness scares Obama supporters.
————————————
I think shes dumb not tough!
I think the fact my neibours could answer those questions better laughable!
Shes a joke…
McCain choice for VP is a crazy wacko!
She is Bush 2

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

By the time Palin has had a few interviews she will become comfortable and more at ease with her answers.
Hillary, Biden, McCain can rattle this stuff off because they have said it a million times.
BO still has trouble giving a straight answer–and an expert punter.
I see great potential in Palin.

Posted by: sally | September 12, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was running an al Qaeda training camp in northern Iraq prior to the invasion. By the way, Mohammad Atta had been dead a year by then!

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

bmc
Thats not what she said !

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

McCain/Palin should just go on vacation.
The way the Democrats are flipping out and saying rediculous things they are losing women and independents in droves.
-comparing BO to Jesus because he was a community organizer
-Palin’s only qualification is because she didn’t have an abortion
-BO’s lipstick comment
-Biden saying Palin is a step backward for women
-sending 30 lawyers to AL
-pro-Obama media attacks
-BO calling people stupid and liars
Where’s their confidence in Obama to win on his star power?

Posted by: riley | September 12, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

The Obama camp has to attack Palin because they know their candidate is weak and has no real accomplishments.
BO is undisciplined, unqualified, and fights like a 4th grader.
Obama has to be forced to attack–so he does it by talking about lipstick and liars. That will scare Putin.

Posted by: sally | September 12, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

Meanwhile, back on teh campaign trail with the VP nominee who supposedly has 35 years of experience…
Biden living up to his gaffe-prone reputation
By John M. Broder
Thursday, September 11, 2008

Posted by: bmc | September 12, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

James Danley
What we know now is different to what we were told at the time do some research check dates!
AQI are Al Qaeda are not linked
Sadam and Al Qaeda had no links
Read the british review of intel used in the lead up to the iraq war or the australian one or the spanish one.. Even read the report of the 911 comission.
No link between sadam and Al Qaeda
No link between AQI and Al Qaeda.
The fact of no link has even been stated by the UN.

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am

riley
Even time mccain lies and palin speacks the lose woman and ind’s.
She looked stupid in the interview everone has said it today!

Posted by: Deb | September 12, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

In an audio recording posted on an Islamic website on June 30, 2006, in response to the death of al Zarqawi (June 7, 2006), Usama bin Laden said (translated from Arabic): “I say to Bush, you should deliver the body (of al-Zarqawi) to his family, and don’t be too happy. Our flag hasn’t fallen, thanks be to God. It has passed from one lion to another lion in Islam. We will continue, God willing, to fight you and your allies everywhere, in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia and Sudan, until we drain your money and kill your men and send you home defeated, God willing, as we defeated you before, thanks to God, in Somalia.”
Deny it all you want, but the truth is there were Iraqi officials who met with al Qaeda officials in Asia in the late 1990s.

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Republican’s keep tellin us what scares us about Palin is she is ok now but she will be great later on. I’m sorry a 2 month crash course on foriegn policy isn’t good enough for this great nation! What scares the crap outa me is that a woman who is a breath away from being leader of the free world needs to cram for the job!!! That’s utter bull and Republicans know it. Country first my ***!

Posted by: Daniel Plainview | September 12, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

From Paul Krugman Op-Ed Columnist
Why do the McCain people think they can get away with this stuff? Well, they’re probably counting on the common practice in the news media of being “balanced” at all costs. You know how it goes: If a politician says that black is white, the news report doesn’t say that he’s wrong, it reports that “some Democrats say” that he’s wrong. Or a grotesque lie from one side is paired with a trivial misstatement from the other, conveying the impression that both sides are equally dirty.
They’re probably also counting on the prevalence of horse-race reporting, so that instead of the story being “McCain campaign lies,” it becomes “Obama on defensive in face of attacks.”
Still, how upset should we be about the McCain campaign’s lies? I mean, politics ain’t beanbag, and all that.
One answer is that the muck being hurled by the McCain campaign is preventing a debate on real issues — on whether the country really wants, for example, to continue the economic policies of the last eight years.
But there’s another answer, which may be even more important: how a politician campaigns tells you a lot about how he or she would govern.
I’m not talking about the theory, often advanced as a defense of horse-race political reporting, that the skills needed to run a winning campaign are the same as those needed to run the country. The contrast between the Bush political team’s ruthless effectiveness and the heckuva job done by the Bush administration is living, breathing, bumbling, and, in the case of the emerging Interior Department scandal, proof to the contrary.
I’m talking, instead, about the relationship between the character of a campaign and that of the administration that follows. Thus, the deceptive and dishonest 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign provided an all-too-revealing preview of things to come. In fact, my early suspicion that we were being misled about the threat from Iraq came from the way the political tactics being used to sell the war resembled the tactics that had earlier been used to sell the Bush tax cuts.
And now the team that hopes to form the next administration is running a campaign that makes Bush-Cheney 2000 look like something out of a civics class. What does that say about how that team would run the country?
What it says, I’d argue, is that the Obama campaign is wrong to suggest that a McCain-Palin administration would just be a continuation of Bush-Cheney. If the way John McCain and Sarah Palin are campaigning is any indication, it would be much, much worse.

Posted by: Prometheus | September 12, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Barack last nite in the forum on volunteerism said basically the same thing.
In response to what happened in the country after 9/11 he spoke about a few things regarding unity then said this.
Paraphrasing…We went after the people who did this…

Posted by: i am so I can!!!! | September 12, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Yeah, democrats are scared of Sarah Palin .Democrats fear for the safty of this country. What can this night school student do to protect my family? Nothing, she knows squat!! She is a parrot who took a crash course on foriegn policy for 2 weeks and now she is ready to lead on day one? Please get this light weight a pass on the Whitehouse tour bus and then kindly send her *** back to Alaska. This is not a joke!

Posted by: Daniel Plainview | September 12, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Jihadis and Al Qaeda didn’t exist in Iraq before we came in!
She doesn’t know anything about foreign policy except what the Bush cronies tell her!
This woman will NEVER get elected. Her bubble is bursting in 3…2…1…

Posted by: eddit | September 12, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Daniel Plainview wrote: “What scares the crap outa me is that a woman who is a breath away from being leader of the free world needs to cram for the job!!!”
Isn’t that what “The One” is doing? He has no foreign policy experience either. But worse yet, he has no executive experience nor has he even run a business. So you will accept HIS “qualifications” (or lack thereof) for BEING the leader of the free world but reject HER actual executive experience (6 months as a mayor and 20 months of being a governor) for being a HEARTBEAT AWAY from being the leader of the free world. That sounds sexist to me!

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am

Sally,
If there is a Ticket that has been fighting like 4th graders, it is the Mccain Campaign.
The keep churning out lies in their Ads with a view to confuse Americans.
They take quotations out of context. Even factcheck.com had to castigate them from gross dishonesty.
If Mccain can not stay above board because of his desire to win the election at all cost, what message do you think that sends to our Children – There is no shame in lying your way up.
Is that the kind of message you want you Child(ren) to carry in their minds for life.
Obama has been a complete Gentleman. I wish he could get into the trenches and discard his gloves.
The Mccain’s Campaign is playing dirty. Sarah Palin is propagating falsehoods and her beliefs are to the extreme.

Posted by: Dare Nigeria | September 12, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

I think this woman was sending her 19 year old son off to war. Perhaps Kornblut could have held off on her “analysis”.
Unless Palin was sending off the troops in a time machine, it seems likely she was talking about the situation in Iraq now– not 5 years ago.

Posted by: MayBee | September 12, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Maybee – you are correct – Al qeada is in Iraq now and was there before but that is separate.
alwriter60 – you admit Al Qeada are there now, so what is wrong with Palin’s speech?, like Maybee says is he going in a time machine!
You libs are so funny it is scary that you can vote! You ignore the socialist comments from Obama, but try to make something out of nothing!!
Journalism is dead in 2008

Posted by: spock | September 12, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

one problem, the majority of the people that carried out 9/11 – Saudis, most of the money that funds Al Queada – from Saudi royalty and drugs grown in Afghanistan. Current stronghold for the Taliban and likely location of the planners of 9/11 – Afghanistan. Greatest “ally” we claim in the region Saudi Arabia. Area with the least US resources and focus on the war on terror – Afghanistan. Yeah, I’m sure she is all up on foreign policy.

Posted by: Danny | September 12, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Dare Nigeria – get your factrs correct – factcheck.org is ran by a liberal organization, so do not go by them, name one distortion McCain has said, and tall me something is not Obama whining all the time?
It seems that the libs are afraid because McCain picked a running mate with far more experience then Obama or Biden put together. But what I do not understand is why they bring up the experience because it is obvious it works against Obama!!
Palin over 10 years experience as an executive (Mayor and Governor)
Obama – 3 years as a Solinski (Socialist Group) Community Organizer
Lets see only 2 Presidents came from the Congress, the majority were Governors or VP’s So History proves that Palin is considered more experience. And did not Clinton say he had the experience because he was a Governor,
Libs are Hypocrits!!

Posted by: spock | September 12, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

I think that Palin does not know what she’s talking about, God bless her.
McCain is trying to scare us into electing him.
Just repeat over and over how those “radical Islamic extremists” are “hell bent” on destroying us. It’s Armageddon! Elect the Republicans, they are the only ones who can protect us from our enemies!
Don’t talk about health care, the economy, tax cuts for the wealthy, tax cuts for corporations, home foreclosures, etc. Just repeat over and over, “radical Islamic extremists”.

Posted by: cincyr | September 12, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

This is just silly. Our major enemy in Iraq is a group call Al Qaeda in Iraq. Palin was making the point that, by fighting in Iraq, we are fighting the same enemy that attacked us. It’s a huge leap to say that she is blaming Iraq for 9/11.
The Left is so keen to catch Palin in a gaffe they’re blind to Biden’s gaffe-o-rama, not to mention Obama’s long history of stupid statements.

Posted by: Dan | September 12, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I keep seeing the term “socialist” applied to Sen. Obama as an insult. Don’t get me wrong, I have no desire to have a true Socialist in the Whitehouse, but we must understand the truth. Our country is by all definitions a socialist country. True it may not be 100% socialist, but 40% of our economy is the government. Roads, water, Internet, Federal Reserve, Military, take over of private corporations, IRS, SEC, FBI, etc. Most Americans do not understand the vast involvement government has in their everyday life. We cannot with a straight face continue to deny the socialist aspects of our country.

Posted by: Jeremy | September 12, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

It’s obvious to most people that Saddam hasn’t been in Iraq for close to five years, and that Palin was speaking recently. Now, I do give WaPo the understanding that they haven’t been covering Iraq all that much since things have been going well for the US, so maybe that’s why the article’s author is confused and thinks Saddam is still in charge over there.

Posted by: Aaron | September 12, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

One little smidgin of fact has been briefly mentioned in this ongoing diatribe that is worthy of more attention. It displays the uncaring, in fact, callous attitude of Sarah Palin’s puppetmasters, as well as herself, for being party to it. Great play was given to a “deployment ceremony” for her 19 year old son, several months before his deployment to Iraq. I cannot help but wonder how many members of National Guard units, recalled, although unwilling reservists, victims of Bush’s hidden draft, and even members of our volunteer military have been graced with such media event “deployment ceremonies”. The press was not even permitted to cover the “undeployment” of 4,155 American dead repatriated in flag draped boxes and scant attention is paid to the 30,568 “offically” wounded in combat in Iraq. Ditto, Vietnam. How many of the 53,000 dead had “deployment ceremonies” held in their honor? I didn’t, nor did three of my brothers. Every one of those 53,000 paid a much higher price than Sen. McCain. We get tired of hearing about the “heroism” of survivors, but when it comes time to pass the hat for funding for the Department of Veterans Affairs, the heroes are nowhere to be seen. It is high time to strip off the flag of Chauvinism and get to work on repairing the damage done to this country on all sides by the failed, outgoing administration. It is not going to be done by adopting Rovian election tactics or those same failed policies.

Posted by: James Wood | September 12, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

The WaPo is already backtracking on their misreporting of this and have performed a “stealth edit” at their web site of the lying paragraph. So I guess that settles it that Governor Palin was NOT implying or saying outright that Saddam ordered 9/11 and that’s why Coalition troops are in Iraq.
And speaking of stealth edits, Mr. Tapper, how about ABC prove that it’s not part of the dinosaurs of the (print) media and put all of the unedited video footage online? You know, so we can really see everything that was asked and answered?
I realize that you’re not a “suit” at ABC, but maybe you can try to influence the brass to air all of the footage online. It’s what the hip kids would do.

Posted by: andycanuck | September 12, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

I think those are perfectly valid comments from a mother of a child deploying on 9/11 to go serve his country in Iraq — a place where al Quaeda once had a stronghold and is now being rooted out.

Posted by: padhorn | September 12, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

I think she watches too much FoxNews.
One often-cited research study about the faulty news coverage of Fox News is from the University of Maryland Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA) Research Center. Released in October 2003 and titled “Misperceptions, The Media and The Iraq War,” the researchers from Knowledge Networks in Menlo Park, Calif. conducted a poll with nearly 10,000 respondents. The study was to see the frequency of misperceptions concerning the news coverage on the Iraq War. The questions focused on whether Iraq was involved with the 9/11 terrorist attacks, whether Iraq was supporting al-Qaeda terrorists, whether weapons of mass destruction have been found, and whether world opinion was for or against the U.S. invading Iraq. The reality was that no links between the Iraqi government and al-Qaeda terrorists have ever surfaced and no weapons of mass destruction have been found. In general, world opinion about the U.S. invasion of Iraq is overwhelmingly negative or non-supportive.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

Sarha Palin very well showed that she IS READY to lead the country:
-To Nowhere!

Posted by: El Mugroso | September 12, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

“a place where al Quaeda once had a stronghold and is now being rooted out.”
And when did this Al Queda stronghold come into being?

Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

You want to know what I think? I think you are spending a hell of alot more time picking through Sarah Palin’s words than you have ever spent picking through Obama’s words.
Why is that?

Posted by: Oxycon | September 12, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

“You want to know what I think? I think you are spending a hell of alot more time picking through Sarah Palin’s words than you have ever spent picking through Obama’s words.”
Waaaaaaaahhhhh
Stop writing about the only interview our VP nominee has given.
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH!

Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

from WaPo:
“The idea that the Iraqi government under Saddam Hussein helped al-Qaeda plan the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, a view once promoted by Bush administration officials, has since been rejected even by the president himself. But it is widely agreed that militants allied with al-Qaeda have taken root in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion. ”
Could you do your readers a favor quoting this paragraph?

Posted by: Julian | September 12, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

“But it is widely agreed that militants allied with al-Qaeda have taken root in Iraq since the U.S.-led invasion. ”
Could you do your readers a favor quoting this paragraph?”
Yes so that they can see as Plain talks about the ones who actually attacked us and conflates them with a supportive organization of the same name that was not in Iraq until we invaded in 2003.

Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Gov Sara Paulin is just another Stupid Person. She has no idea of anything and is the worst choice for VP ever made. Hope when this is over and she is again a full time govenor she is found guilty of abuse of power at the least. Boooo

Posted by: Ranger Phx | September 12, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

Sadly, Sarah Palin expressed what many Americans still believe to this day — the Iraq War was retaliation for the 9/11 attacks. There are only two possbile conclusions — She is either ignorant herself about the truth or, in a strategical political move, is happy to advance the ignorance of the American people as long as it keeps bringing the “fear” votes in for the Republican party.

Posted by: Angie | September 12, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

Ryan C,
Some people live in nostalgia; some people just cannot afford that.

Posted by: Julian | September 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

The ENQUIRER has learned exclusively that Sarah’s oldest son, Track, was addicted to the power drug OxyContin for nearly the past two years, snorting it, eating it, smoking it and even injecting it. And as Track, 19, heads to Iraq as part of the U.S. armed forces, Sarah and her husband Todd were powerless to stop his wild antics, detailed in the new issue of The ENQUIRER, which goes on sale today.
The source also divulged the girls would do anything for Track and he’d use his local celebrity status to manipulate other guys “to get them to steal things he wanted.”
“He finally did what a lot of troubled kids here do,” the source divulged. “You join the military.”
And as Gov. Palin has billed the state of Alaska for various expenses related to her children, as reported by The Washington Post, The ENQUIRER’s investigation reveals that she was so incensed by 17-year-old Bristol’s pregnancy that she banished her daughter from the house.

Posted by: Henri | September 12, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I think since Gibson asked Obama the same question at the NH debate, it would have made a good comparison contrast to point that out. I also think that ABC’s editing was too severe, crossed the line, and when you see the video of her actual speech…it shows that Gibson was wrong when he said, “EXACT WORDS” He took that from an AP report that was hacked, then hacked it more. Sad. I expect this kinda thing from FOX or MSNBC, but not ABC.

Posted by: Scott Malensek | September 12, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Some of you Obama supporters are showing signs of unmitigated desperation in your comments. You really hate the fact that Sen. McCain has chosen an incredibly superior vice presidential running mate (even your own VP candidate said that he wasn’t the best choice) that you have to reach to the bottom of the sewer for your personal attacks against Sen. McCain, Gov. Palin (and her family) and all conservatives. And I thought the Democratic Party was the party of inclusion and tolerance. You prove that you are tolerant of only those of a like ideology. So much for “The One’s” mystical powers to unite everyone into a message of hope and change. It’s just the same ol’ hatred towards those who disagree with you.
What you Obama supporters fail to understand is that Republicans win when the base of the party is energized. And Sen. McCain’s selection of Gov. Palin has more than energized the Republican Party she has energized Independents and disenchanted Democrats. Sen. McCain has more legislative experience and foreign policy experience than Sen. Obama! And Gov. Palin has more executive experience than Sen. Obama and Sen. Biden combined.

Posted by: James Danley | September 12, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

You can twist Palin’s words any way you choose. If it comes down to who the majority of Americans trust to keep our country safe, the Republican ticket will win.

Posted by: marylou | September 12, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

As a female business owner and Republican (moderate and currently undecided as to presidential election), I found the Palin interview fair and balanced. However, I was disturbed by her lack of knowledge on national security/foreign relations…she reminded me of myself when I just started out in business…determined, yes; prepared, not really, but I honestly thought I was…however, somehow I expected the party to prepare Palin properly, but then again she didn’t have much time to prepare for this task of running for VP. So, I rate Palin’s performance as ‘fair’ and had she shown more confidence, my rating would be a bit higher. She seemed ‘on edge’…which for me, as a business executive was very surprising. Gibson is nothing compared to the series of very difficult interviews everyone who holds the two top positions in the land faces almost everyday. The interview helps some of us understand why our party has kept her away from the national media. She should do much better when interviewed by our conservative commentator Sean Hannity on Pox News. I’m glad there are 50+ days left to give me more time to push away from all the news jabs so I can make the best decision in November. Unlike some, my vote will not be on personalities. As an informed women, I value my vote, my voice…my ancestors fought too long and worked too hard for me to base my vote on something so foolish as personality or gender. For me, it’s facts and not fluff. The challenge is getting past all of the ‘talking heads’ (I find our commentators particularly misleading and have voiced my frustrations to them). Lately, I’ve had to turn them off. But I can’t turn to the newspaper because there is too much bias there on both sides. Does anyone know where to truly find unbiased news? I find myself turning to C-Span more than I ever have in the past.

Posted by: Florence R | September 12, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

With all this talk about Palin you would think SHE was running for Pres. If I were McCain I would be jealous!!
OBAMA/BIDEN our next Pres. and VP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Ronnie | September 17, 2008, 12:07 am 12:07 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.