Rudy Asks: Where Are the Feminist Groups? Republicans Say Media Scared of Palin
On "Fox and Friends" this morning, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani said the media has "savaged" Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.
Giuliani said he was "really angry and I am really upset. … Where are these feminist groups? I mean, she is being asked questions like, ‘Can you be a vice president and a mother?’ But what about Barack Obama — can you be a president and a father? Or John McCain? I was never asked that question, or George Bush or Al Gore. All these men have run, most of them had families — some of them had young children — none of them were ever asked, ‘Can you be a father and can you be president or vice president?’"
The ex-New York Mayor pointed out that this week’s cover of US Weekly, about Palin and her 17-year-old daughter Bristol’s pregnancy, is titled "Babies Lies & Scandal."
Last week’s cover, Giuliani said, was about Michelle Obama, and it was titled "Why Barack Loves Her."
"Anyone that says there isn’t a media bias is living on Mars," Giuliani said. "And anyone that says a woman nominated by the Republican ticket isn’t treated differently is also somewhere in outer space."
Giuliani noted that the attacks are because the Left is afraid.
"This is historic; they realize it is historic," Giuliani said.
The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board elaborated on that notion today that "What’s really going on here is that the Beltway class can see how popular the Palin pick is with Republicans outside Washington, and especially with middle-class conservatives. As Richard Land, a leader with the Southern Baptist Convention, said Monday, John McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin closed the ‘enthusiasm gap’ between the two parties.
"There is nothing more dangerous to entrenched Washington power than a populist conservative who looks unlikely to buy into Washington’s creature comforts. Take a close look at Governor Palin’s record on ethics and energy in Alaska, and it becomes clear what this Beltway outburst is actually about. The irony is that, while Senator Obama is running on change, his acceptance speech made explicit that he’s promising only more power and money for Washington. Sarah Palin’s history of taking on the career politicians of a corrupt Alaskan GOP machine — her own party — shows that she’s the more authentic change agent."
What do you think? Is that what’s "really going on here"?
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
This kind of attack is soooo 20 years ago. Trying to create a battle between “the people” and “the Beltway” is tired, old-style politics. It’s become, sadly, the default position for the Republican party. Change is one thing, but setting groups against one another is the worst form of campaigning.
Posted by: Howard, NYC | September 3, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
yes, she changed someone’s corruption for her own , power without any limits, etiquet and moral.
Do not tell me about great Mom. Yes, thing happen. And MOm always feel the fault. But not went to gamble politics to teach us – how to live.
I do consider her entire life as disgrace, the race for career and no matter what.
Let’s face it.
Posted by: Linda,Fl | September 3, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Where Are the Feminist Groups?
==============================
They’re out doing something McCain overlooked… vetting Palin.
You know, it’s a trivial idea, but some people like to find out about a person before throwing their support behind them.
Posted by: Deep Release | September 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
What’s happening is that Palin is an existential threat to the coastal elites. She’s someone Mo Dowd would never meet out at the Hamptons and she won’t play along with them. Unlike Obama, who long ago learned to swim with the morally and politically bankrupt crowd that populates universities and urban centers, Palin really is an agent of change. That’s she’s a woman who doesn’t kowtow to the hidebound 60s feminism (which is really just leftist groupthink with an estrogenic veneer) now placed in the drinking water on the coasts, is just more galling to them. This is what real change looks like.
Posted by: Free Thinker | September 3, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
um no. She is being attacked because she is not fit for the job she has been offered – and it was easier for her to get this job than it is to get a job at Wal-Mart. And yes the everyone but the evangelicals are horrified because she could actually be president. Maybe she’ll give Alaska independence and I don’t know what else. She lied in her first speech and I don’t trust her. Maybe if I’d known her for the last 2 yrs I would have given her the benefit of teh doubt but she sounds like a crazy, deranged right wing nut to me. And I am 33yr old working mom.
Posted by: crazy | September 3, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Looks like the DNC still believes in the glass ceiling!
Posted by: argh! | September 3, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
I will say this, I get the feeling that most in the media, and those that follow politics relatively closely, are holding their collective breath right now. On one level, a very deep, gut level, many just see this pick taking a dive. (On Charlie Rose, Halperin said he was leaning towards thinking that this was an “insane” pick.)
So what are the roots? Well, for one, Gov. Palin is very new. Two, she’s from Alaska. Three, here family and current life story is MADE for People magazine and others of its ilk. Four, the McCain campaign has said/done some really boneheaded things in response to vetting and experience questions (Campbell Brown/CNN botch, gender card…). Five, Dan Balz tells us McCain picked her out of a hat about a week-ago. And six, the campaign has sequestered her since Sunday, leaving everyone to believe that she is upstair studying her Foreign Relations like she is about to take the exam to get into Columbia’s journalism school.
This is not the media’s fault. This McCain’s fault and his whinning will do little to assuage what, I believe, is the already crested wave of public opinion against her. I predict next week you see Obama with +8 point advantage in a state like New Hampshire.
Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
The reason Sarah Palin is attacked so visciously by liberals is because she has more experience than the top of the Democratic ticket. When the Democrats whine about her lack of foreign affairs experience, all the Republicans have to do is point to Obama’s similar lack of foreign affairs experience. The Democrats forced Joe Biden on Barack Obama to shore up his lack of experience. It’s now clear to the entire country that the wrong man is at the top of the ticket. Dems are embarrassed, and Repubs are laughing.
Posted by: Disapppointed but not Surprised | September 3, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
What’s going on here is Republican Politics 101. You got a crappy candidate, so you attack criticisms of said candidate as “Media Bias”, if the candidate is female, then they’re “sexist”.
Hillary Clinton took a page from this playbook in the final twilight hours of her failed campaign against Obama.
It reeks of desperation.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | September 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
What did the media say when John Kerry picked John Edwards? Didn’t John Edwards have less experience than Palin? Did anyone ask Edwards if he’d be able to perform his fatherly duties *and* be VP?
No.
Posted by: jose | September 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Here comes the republicans diversion from issues (ECONY) and dredging up the cultural wars of division.
Posted by: watching | September 3, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
AMERICANS are scared of Palin.
the media happens to be Americans.
scared that the republicans would throw the nation so far under the bus…that they would pick the absolute worst VP candidate in our history.
Again I was President of my student body in high school and President of the Residential student body at my college…over more people than Palin had in her hometown…
does that give me the requisite “executive experience” to be commander in chief?
sad sad sad…the last of John Mccain’s character has slipped away.
Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
“The reason Sarah Palin is attacked so visciously by liberals is because she has more experience than the top of the Democratic ticket.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By this asinine measure, she has more experience than the top of the REPUBLICAN ticket.
THINK about your talking points before spouting them!
Posted by: ChrisNBama | September 3, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Yoo Whooo Rudy we are right here! You silly snits thought we would support Palin just because she is a women??….good grief, you are soooo out of touch! This woman is trying to set us back 50 years, thanks, but no thanks!
Posted by: Trish | September 3, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
whine, republicans whine, dosen’t look good for your strong image.
whine, whine, whine
Posted by: whiners | September 3, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am
The media have pointed out what Palin is all about…her past, her ethics, and politics. Not that I like the media, but this time they have done some investigative journalism and the truth offends those who make choices simply to please the Christian right as McCain did in this instance.
Posted by: Two-cats | September 3, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
If the Republicans are trying to play the gender card, it certainly is working on me. I’ve been a Democrat all my life. I was sickened by the way Democrats treated Hillary, and I am sickened by the way they are attacking Sarah Palin. Why do I owe loyalty to a party that clearly shows little respect for women? I realize the Republicans are trying to exploit the anger of Democratic women. At the same time, I applaud the fact that Republicans don’t seem to have a problem with a woman in the White House. Conservatives have treated Palin with far more respect than many Democrats treated Clinton. I was going to stay home in November. With the nomination of Sarah Palin, I will cast my vote for the Republicans.
Posted by: Another Sarah | September 3, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
jose
other VP candidates actually knew what the mujahadin was and had proven it over a year and a half…
can Palin even spell mujahadin?
it is her awareness, grasp and knowledge of ANY of the issues that face us (and knowing oil pipeline issues…is not an energy policy ugh)
that is the rerason she is the WORST VP candidate …in our entire nation’s history.
Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
The problem is simple, their views..McCain or Palin does not match mine… A woman.
Posted by: beck | September 3, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
rick
are you talking about the protesters outside that they used tear gas on?
Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Palin has the old boys club scared to death. Why? Because Americans are going to absolutely love her and how she will attack corruption regardless of party. She is the fighter we’ve needed for decades to root out the old boys that have fed from the lobbyist trough at our expense for decades. Palin proves that government OF THE PEOPLE is still possible. Expect more slanderous filth as the old boys club from both parties gets more scared. You know what old boys? No one will care. Americans will be with Palin when we toss your sorry butts out of office!!!!!!
Posted by: Kevin, OH | September 3, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
If palin were a guy from Alaska with the same experience, would mccain have picked him? You can BET the farm he never would have even considered him, which only proves that this pick was political and gives an insight into the decision making abilities that mccain has. Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: pt | September 3, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
It still boggles the mind that McCain who has singularly run against Obama’s inexperience has now tapped someone with less experience than Obama to be Number Two.
Moreover, they are peddling the outrageous lie that she is more qualified “day one” than Obama.
Of course, they’ve cut off all media access to Governor Palin, so they have time to acquaint her with domestic and foreign politics so she doesn’t look completely silly when she’s asked questions about them and doesn’t know the answers to them. Like when she fluffed of a question about the Iraq war and the surge, sounding dangerously disinterested from the conflict.
I really don’t know what to make of the Republican Party. They used to stand for something. It’s become a handmaiden to special fringe elements.
Posted by: ChrisNBama | September 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Those Republicans who claim that Palin has more executive experience than Obama are laughable!
Posted by: Two-cats | September 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
This is a case of poor judgment by McCain and stop making excuses for that. How can werisk having McCain as president when he has failed his first test of chosing a running mate.
Posted by: Kenny | September 3, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
she has more experience than the top of the Democratic ticket.
Oh yea hon, she has much more experience sticking her fingers into the pork barrel, being a member of a certain party that wants to secede from the U.S., destroying people that don’t think as she does, cutting social programs, trying to ban books that she doesn’t agree with…etc. The list goes on and on.
Posted by: Trish | September 3, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Governor Palin isn’t a Harvard law grad. She’s just an ordinary American citizen that was sick to death of corrupt government. Unlike all the rhetoric by other dems and repubs she actually has done something about it. I hope to god she runs for president in 2012 or 2016. The country needs people like her. Go Sarah!!!
Posted by: Michelle, Boston | September 3, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Maybe Schmidt or Davis can get some lessons about whining from Phil Graham.
Look at the Newsweek interview that Palin gave about whining, and Hillary Clinton.
They put the information about Bristol out there. They are sending campaign people out to the television shows to spin, and they don’t like when they are pressed to answer the questions put to them — rather than obfuscate.
Look no further than the ridiculous talking points that the McCain camp sends their minions to the talk shows with. Foreign Policy through osmosis and geographic proximity.
Pot. Kettle. McCain/Palin.
Posted by: Primrose | September 3, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
It’s all about retaining money and power. Obama talks a good game, but has never taken on his own party and in fact promises more of the same old Dem policies. As a running mate to accomplish his goals, he chose a 36-year Washington insider.
Sarah took on her own party – which is why you’ll have no trouble finding Alaskan Republicans who’ll talk trash on her – and reached out to Dems to get things accomplished. She shook the Old Boys Club and rooted out corruption. She’s a Washington outsider and a maverick and you can bet the Old Guard in Washington doesn’t want her anywhere near them.
Obama talks the talk. Palin walks the walk. She and McCain make an absolutely Dynamic Duo for Change!
Posted by: marylou | September 3, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
again where are the questions and answers from PALIN HERSELF
are you not all aware that she has not been allowed to be asked questions…
maybe because she can’t answer them?
duh.
show me one statement…one interview…one word outside a speech that was written by someone else where she answered questions and follow ups that show her grasp on ANY issue we are facing…
and negotiating n oil pipeline IS NOT AN ENERGY POLICY!
Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Palin is under investigation in her home state of Alaska, very inexperienced, extreme right, a separatist and the fact that McCain had met her only once raises serious questions.
McCain has failed the test on judgment.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
“Governor Palin isn’t a Harvard law grad. She’s just an ordinary American citizen that was sick to death of corrupt government.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You’re right. She has a degree in journalism and started out as a Sportscaster before running for a mayor of a town of 5000.
Frankly, I WANT someone who ISN’T ordinary to be in the most demanding role of our Constitutional Republic.
We’ve had eight long years of the guy we’d like to have a beer with.
How about eight years of the guy who has a positive vision for our nation?
Posted by: ChrisNBama | September 3, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
are you all reading that the challenges to Palin are on substance and her lack there of
…and the challenges to Obama are on his wife’s anger and sexism toward a VP candidate whose own promises and policies HURT WOMEN.
ugh
stupid is as stupid does.
Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am
I can’t believe the frenzy. These crooked politicians are actually scared to death of this true reformer we’ve finally found. They’ll use every resource they can to destroy her because she’s just one of us and they destroy us as often as they can.
Posted by: Betty, FL | September 3, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Wow, a christian who isn’t afraid to stand by christian beliefs. How refreshing! Mr. catholic Joe Biden gets condemned by his own state’s arch-bishop. Why? Because he doesn’t live christian values. Obama claims to be a christian yet votes against protecting babies born alive during botched abortions. The kid fought like heck to stay alive and Obama thinks it’s fine to put it in a sealed medical waste bag until it stops breathing. What kind of christian is that?
Posted by: ChristianVoter | September 3, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I have news for those of you questioning Obama`s foreign policy credentials.
Obama not only has a degree in foreign relations but also has served on the Senate foreign relations commitee for three years and met a lot of foreign leaders.
Palin has zero. Dont tell me about executive because michelle Obama has got executive experience too.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
If “change” is just changing out Republicans for Democrats then Obama represents “change”
If change is reform then McCain and Palin will win.
From the beginning of the primaries the attacks on Clinton were unacceptable. The media attacks represented the pro Obama bias. No one in the Democratic Party stood up to this amplified and sick version of “politics as usual”
The “piling on” Palin is indicative that the “chosen one” may be in trouble.
Perhaps Americans really do want change and what was a campaign slogan is really taking root.
Posted by: Jackie | September 3, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Andrea
did you just really say
“Palin’s foreign affairs experience is on a par with Obama’s.”
and the easter bunny is coming to visit you.
Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
“I can’t believe the frenzy. These crooked politicians are actually scared to death of this true reformer we’ve finally found.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Palin a reformer? Har de har har. She headed a 527 for Senator “I’m indicted?” Stevens. She was for the “Bridge To Nowhere” before she was against it. And when the political brouhaha started over that fiasco, she didn’t return those earmarked funds to the federal treasury, she reassigned them to other pork projects. She invested 27 million dollars in lobbying Washington for more pork for hometown projects.
The biggest lie in recent memory is that Palin is a reformer. Even her signature ethics reform was done by the state legislature that was reacting to severe corruption charges and federal investigations.
Please no more of this Palin “reform” nonsense!
Posted by: ChrisNBama | September 3, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
She will be forged by fire, Bye Bye Hillary (cry, Cry), thanks Barak.
Posted by: go-dems | September 3, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I voted for Rudy :-(
Can’t wait till I can vote for him for governor, though!!!
Posted by: D'Obama | September 3, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
I do not want an Alaskan separatist bein my VP. Poor judgment by McCain. This is why 26 years of experience does not necessarily translate into good juedgment.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Okay….stop with bull about this woman being an “outsider” and that she took on corruption in her party. I’ve seen just as much evidence that this woman was guided by special interests (oil companies, NRA, social conservative) to fire those who oppose her. What does anybody really know Sarah Palin? The truth is very little….And oh by the way, what exactly will McCain and Palin reform in Washington? The answer is nothing. They will continue to pander special interests who agree with their agenda while railing against those who don’t.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 3, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
and what reform would that be that palin and McCain would bring…
taking out science all together and replacing it with the church completely?
Posted by: dl | September 3, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
You get’em Sarah! Anyone who belittles a working mom of 5 doesn’t know who they’re dealing with. Probably some scared little men that don’t like her because she lacks their miniscule genitalia. Look out boys, Sarah Barracuda is going to clean your clocks!!!!!
Posted by: MomOfSix, PA | September 3, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
I am struck by the GOP’s claim that they want change and that McCain & Palin will take on the bruisers in Washington that have put the country in such dire straits. The irony is that the same people that are singing McCain’s praises ARE the entrenched bruisers that got us to where we are. Don’t forget, 4 years ago these same people claimed George W. Bush was the messiah that was going to lead us to the promised land. And remember this as well: Bush and Cheney didn’t do it alone. The GOP cheered them on.
Posted by: JeffB, Los Angeles | September 3, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
I do believe there have been sexist comments regarding Palin and it is uncalled for. However, the Republicans and a a McCain spokesperson diminished the sexism problem by painting a broad sexist brush to any and everyone that inquires into Palin’s background. I saw an interview with a person about her foreign policy experience and when the spokesperson came up short on answers she cried sexism and accused the questioner of belittling Palin. We see this time and time again. The talking points for the McCain campaign must be – if you don’t have an answer on Palin, just cry sexism.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Aa fir Guliani….maybe feminists are not coming to Palin’s defense because of the hypocrisy shown by Republicans when dealing with Democrats in similar situations. Republican hypocriasy knows no bounds…
Posted by: indy_voter | September 3, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
The Democrats are arguing that Palin has no foreign affairs experience? What foreign countries has Obama dealt with – the Republics of Indiana and Missouri? My Republican relatives are right – the Democratic Party is just too damn stupid to be a part of. I can’t believe it took me this long to realize that.
Posted by: Ex-Dem, New Independ. | September 3, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Palin a reformer???
Why is she under investigation in Alaska?
Why was she part of a separatist group?
Why doesn`t she believe in global warming?
Why is McCain who is on top of the ticket vowing to continue Bush`s policies?
Why was she heading a 527 group?
Thats not typical of a reformer.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
The reason Sarah Palin is attacked so visciously by liberals is because she has more experience than the top of the Democratic ticket. When the Democrats whine about her lack of foreign affairs experience, all the Republicans have to do is point to Obama’s similar lack of foreign affairs experience. The Democrats forced Joe Biden on Barack Obama to shore up his lack of experience. It’s now clear to the entire country that the wrong man is at the top of the ticket. Dems are embarrassed, and Repubs are laughing.
Posted by: Disappointed but not Surprised | September 3, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Where are the Fem Groups – We Are Coming!
We WILL Come to the rescue – by the MILLIONS – we are called WOMEN!
The media bashing of GOV Palin is a DISGRACE – same dirty political tricks used on Hillary Clinton – we are watching – and will let you know in NOV that we will NOT tolerate this – or VOTE for obama. The media and DNC are a DISGRACE for not standing up to this abuse!
Posted by: Abby | September 3, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
ST. PAUL, Minn. – John McCain touts Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as a force in the his battle against earmarks and entrenched power brokers, but under her leadership the state this year asked for almost $300 per person in requests for pet projects from one of McCain’s top adversaries: indicted Sen. Ted Stevens. That’s more than any other state received, per person, from Congress for the current budget year, and runs counter to the reformer image that Palin and the McCain campaign are pushing. Other states got just $34 worth of local projects per person this year, on average, according to Citizens Against Government Waste, a Washington-based watchdog group.
Posted by: Owen | September 3, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Disappointed-you had they same post on another thread. I asked you and got no response so I will ask again: Please name ONE (just one) example of foreign policy experience Palin has and your answer may not include the National Guard.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Firing those who oppose Palin is not reform.
It is called abuse of power. Corrupt or autocrat.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Mrs Palin in her earlier political career as mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a private lobbyist to help the tiny town secure earmarks from Stevens, entering Washington’s “pay to play” culture in which lobbyists, campaign contributions and lawmakers are intertwined.
The town obtained 14 earmarks, totaling $27 million between 2000-2003, according to data compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense.
Federal lobbying records show that Wasilla hired the firm of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh in 2000 to arrange “funding of city projects.” The signature on the registration form is that of Steven W. Silver, a former top aide to Stevens, who chaired the Senate Appropriations Committee on and off between 1997 and 2005.
Posted by: Carlos Mencia | September 3, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Barack Obama has gained significant support among white men since the Democratic Convention, but his support level among white women has remained the same. The reason: Republican white women have slightly increased their support for McCain, offsetting Obama’s gains among independent and Democratic women.
Obama is in trouble
Posted by: joyce | September 3, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
The media is questioning Palin`s experience, her links to separatists and abuse of power.
What is sexist about this? I need an answer.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
The difference between the way Obama has been treated by the media and Palin have been treated is stark.
The number of people that have been thrown under the bus for Obama- Bill Clinton and Geraldine Ferraro at the top of the list- is telling.
The Feminist groups have always been Democratic women’s groups, so it isn’t too surprising they aren’t sticking up for Palin. It is surprising to see the media, who have let Obama off the hook about Rezko and Ayers, and who have not pushed him on his foreign policy credentials, treat Palin with such open hostility.
Posted by: MayBee | September 3, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Disapppointed but not Surprised,
Folks forget one important thing when comparing Obama’s experience with Palin….Obama has been vetted 18 months…Palin all of a week. 18 million voters voted for Obama in the Democratic primary….Palin was selected by one man. Like him or not America knows Obama now. How can anyone get to know Palin in two months? The truth is they can’t….not unless you are like GWB and can look into her eyes and see her soul…
Posted by: indy_voter | September 3, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Aren’t the Republicans truly the ones defaming women! Everyone knows if a man nominated for VP had the same resume as Palin, he’d be laughed out of town!!! It demeans the accomplishments of real qualified women including Hillary, Kay Bailey Hutchison, Olympia Snowe etc…
I can only imagine how offended these women with true experience are, no matter what they say to the media.
Posted by: tgl | September 3, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Let’s play a little game.
One of the main talking points against Sarah Palin is that she’s “a heartbeat away” from the presidency and lacks the experience needed for that office.
So let’s begin.
McCain has a history of melanoma and many speculate that he’ll die immediately after taking the oath of office, leaving Sarah on her own without McCain’s guidance on foreign policy.
Biden has a history of brain aneurysms and also could immediately die after Obama takes the oath of office, leaving Obama on his own with Biden’s guidance on foreign policy.
In fact, between these two scenarios, Biden’s sudden death without warning is far more likely than McCain’s; I would venture to say that it’s a given fact that sudden death from an aneurysm is likely to happen while sudden death from melanoma is not.
So in either of these scenarios, where are we?
In Sarah’s case, we have Sarah as president, who has had time to prepare for taking over presidential duties. And we have Nancy Pelosi who automatically steps in as VP with a Democratic-controlled Congress.
In Obama’s case, we have him as president, with no time to prepare without Biden’s guidance. And we have Nancy Pelosi who automatically steps in as VP with a Democratic-controlled Congress.
Which of these two scenarios are you more comfortable with?
Posted by: marylou | September 3, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
The Democrats and Press are scared…in a panic.
Obama is the insider; Palin is the outsider and represents real change.
America’s middle-class will support her because she represents someone outside the lawyer, liberal, Washington cronyism politics.
She is middle-America.
This scares the heck out of all the Washington insiders.
Posted by: Sally J. | September 3, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Joyce
McCain has selected a right wing extremist who doesn`t share the values of most women.
McCain has also opposed same pay for women and opposed the use of contraceptives for women but supports viagra for men.
McCain and Palin are also opposed to abortion rights.
Tell me why women and independents should vote for them. And i have news for you Obama is leading the female votes.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Miss Alaska Sarah paulin is corrupt, Paulin has no ethical standards and has dictatorial behaviours as a mayor and as a governor of the smallest state in the US. Feminists will not fight the fight of a 15th century conservative Miss Alaska, Rudy has to fight that fight for her. Media is right, can she manage her family and her work already there is one victim of her lack of parenting skills, her 17 years-old daugther is pregnant, that is a disaster for any family who believes in Christian values. God save America from McPaulin, Rudy, Fred, Mike, Liberman, Rove and Mit. God bless America and God bless Obama/Biden.
Posted by: BKMC | September 3, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Mary Lou, learn basic civics. Pelosi does not automatically assume the Vice Presidency. The President nominates his own choice, just like they do with running mates
Posted by: Doc DB | September 3, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
Whenever the right wing doesn’t like a question, they lash out at the questioner. It’s a form of flipping the question — the right are trying to turn the issue from one of “is she qualified” to “is the press biased” because the latter reframes the debate in their interest. It’s blatantly fricking obvious, but difficult to defend when they all parrot the same talking points. The press can’t bury these statements because then it looks like censorship in self-interest. This blog post, by raising the issue of whether there is indeed sexism going on, is precisely how the right manipulates the media in these kinds of situations.
And to answer your question: no. What is going on is that an unknown person is undergoing serious vetting by journalists who are clamoring over each other to get the scoop of the century. The fact that pretty unflattering stuff was found in the first 24-48 hours was like blood in the water.
Do Republicans seriously think they can do a token-woman plant and then claim they are fighting for women? Ridiculous.
So let me get this right: the nominee for the second highest position in the land on behalf of the party that has cut funding for teen pregnancy programs, supported abstinence only education, railed against women in the workplace, and generally derailed the other side for their lack of “traditional family values” has a pregnant unwed teenage daughter that she knowingly and willingly thrust into the national spotlight by accepting this nomination in the first place and by doubling-down on her “hockey mom” angle in her first two minutes of her first national speech and this person subsequently was found to be a secessionist, creationist, pro-book banning, end-times Joel’s Army type with a God’s plan approach to foreign policy and whose much touted anti-earmark rhetoric belies a very pro-earmark Ted Stevens 527 running reality and whose self-touted reformist brand is conflicted by numerous well-founded and legally tractable cases of ethical lapses in which she abused her office for political and personal gain and whose sole economic credentials come from two failed businesses, one of which ran afoul of the law and which she failed to disclose as is legally required upon her becoming Governor and whose foreign policy experience is being close to Russia and whose sole governance experience is a year and a half of an tiny state 47th out of 50 in population and being mayor of a town smaller than my college and none of this is relevant? OK. I guess I’ll just report on how hot she is then.
Posted by: Michael, IL | September 3, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
You republicans can spin all you want but it doesnt take away the fact that McCain has displayed poor judgment in his first most important decision.
This has already backfired.
Posted by: Kenny | September 3, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
dl,
The reform Palin and McCain will bring is to outlaw abortion, teach creationism and abstinence-only in schools, and ban books they deem offensive from school libraries…As for tackling corruption…..McCain should came down hard on Republican lobbyists during the convention, right?
Posted by: indy_voter | September 3, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Indy-Voter -I hope you don’t mind if I add to your great post: Obama has met with the heads of state of countries in the Middle East and Europe. He’s met with our commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s traveled with Sen. Lugar to secure loose nuclear weapons in Russia. We all know his policies regarding the Middle East, Russia, Venezuela, etc. Mention that not only do we know nothing of Gov. Palin’s foreign policy experience, we don’t know her thoughts on foreign policy, and neither does she – in a recent interview, she said she hadn’t given Iraq much thought.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am
LOL, great post Michael IL!
Posted by: Doc DB | September 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
She is distracting but I want to hear her speech tonight and see what she has to say. The rampant sexism has been too allowable in the face of the angst over racism. The left is too anxious to blow her out of the water, and that tendancy of Obama to run behind skirts when attacked, too noticeable. The hypocrisy is palpable.
I don’t care for EXTREME conservatism. She supports issues that I can’t and won’t. But she deserves the same chance as Obama and she has more experience to work from, so she has a right to be heard without demeaning her because she is a woman. A minority of 51% is not to be ignored.
Otherwise, the Democrats become not the opposition, but the Party of Hate and that is not, I suspect, what they want to become. Still they are on that path and as a former Democrat gone independent because of what was done to Hillary Clinton, I have to make a decision based on what the candidates say and my sense of their ability to deliver.
Otherwise, republic is just another name for oligarchy, be it left, right or center.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
“I do not want an Alaskan separatist bein my VP. Poor judgment by McCain. This is why 26 years of experience does not necessarily translate into good juedgment.
Posted by: Keith”
Even if that’s true, it’s better than electing a guy who is friends w/ terrorists and other assorted America haters, and who espouses Marxist policies. Just sayn’ …
Posted by: D'Obama | September 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
These are all the reasons why Obama is winning this fall. How can republicans run down the country and expect to be given another four years.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
If I just got exposed to the US politics and media in the days since Palin’s selection, I’d definitely think everyone is afraid of something about Palin if not Palin herself and if not afraid then envious.
Really, Big O clubbed HC with change and then went establishment and yet continues to exploit a contradictory message of changes. I guess he is confined in a rhetoric environment.
Palin comes with a long record of gutsy challenges to the status quo even with a short record of public service. What she has accomplished in a few years might take other a lifetime to achieve. This woman is awesome and yet so real it’s hard not to believe her.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 3, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
What I want to know is, when did god change his mind? This woman doesn’t fit the “traditional christian” mother mold. A newborn with down’s syndrome, doesn’t he need his mother more than the “country”? At least, thank god, she doesn’t believe in birth control and believes in abstinence only, that’s why she’s going to be a grandmother, she forced those “values” on her seventeen year old daughter. Isn’t god’s position women stay at home and care for the children, and let the men be the leaders? She went to a “holy roller” Assembly of God church, she knows that. The media and the public taking swipes is offending the right. Well, according “them” she shouldn’t be there in the first place. When DID god change his mind people?
Posted by: Texas Lil | September 3, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Obama hits 50% in new poll.
Conclusion: Women are very offended by McCain`s attempt to insult their intelligence in thinking that they`d vote for Plain just because shes a woman. She doesnt share their values.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Yes, many women are “afraid” of McCain/Palin. We’ve worked hard and advanced our rights a long way the last 40 years and do not want to see that reversed.
Posted by: Jennifer | September 3, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Ever hear of the Presidential Succession Act of 1947? Apparently not. *shaking my head*
Posted by: marylou | September 3, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Samantha,
Okay, so let’s say that Obama\Biden or McCain\Palin are true reformers. And let’s also say that Obama\Biden and McCain\Palin both have lack of experience in certain areas. It then comes down to policy. Republican policies have driven country to its knees. McCain supports continuing those policies. Obama does not. Plain and simple. If folks believe that Bush policies are correct but mis-managed then vote for McCain. If folks believe that a real change in policy is needed than vote for Obama….everything else is just noise..Just don’t give me any crap McCain\Palin will change Washington because they won’t…
Posted by: indy_voter | September 3, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
What I want to know is, when did god change his mind? This woman doesn’t fit the “traditional christian” mother mold. A newborn with down’s syndrome, doesn’t he need his mother more than the “country”? At least, thank god, she doesn’t believe in birth control and believes in abstinence only, that’s why she’s going to be a grandmother, she forced those “values” on her seventeen year old daughter. Isn’t god’s position women stay at home and care for the children, and let the men be the leaders? She went to a “holy roller” Assembly of God church, she knows that. The media and the public taking swipes is offending the right. Well, according “them” she shouldn’t be there in the first place. When DID god change his mind people?
Posted by: Texas Lil | September 3, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Joyce says Obama has done nothing in his career to advance women.
_________________________________________________
So you do not believe women doing the exact same job as men should be paid equally? Your candidate opposed it.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Unlike Obama, who only wants to tax, tax, and tax again, Palin, has proven she can “run with the Big boys” and win. She’s not afraid to stand up to her party for the interest of the people. Obama’s problem is that this election is all about him. Palin has already proven she is more qualified than even Obama for POTUS if she were running for that position.
McCain/Palin 08!
“Country First!”
Posted by: david from texas | September 3, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
D`Obama
`Even if that’s true, it’s better than electing a guy who is friends w/ terrorists and other assorted America haters, and who espouses Marxist policies. Just sayn’
=========================================
Obama has to take responsibility just because Ayers knows him?
Am not surprised you also think McCain should be responsible for Lary Craig patronizing male prostitutes just because he knows him.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Let’s stop the sexism crap! The public has a right to know. The public also has the right to know what is with Todd Palin? Why is he involved in these little scandals. I think we buy this wingnut along with her. Why is she investigating herself?
Posted by: Thinking | September 3, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Mccain hounded Obama about experience, and leadership, He hounded obama on Country first, and the need to have a strong sense of foreign policy
Time and Time again he sent his reThugs to smash obama on his ineffective record, and questioned his judgment…
and now we see that mccain has went back on all that he said…
he put someone with zero foreign policy experience, little to no experience governing, put a woman on the ticket so he could hopefully get WOMENS votes (after all a women is a women is a women and palin is interchangeable with hillary clinton because they are women)
john mccain squandered his first presidential task to a gimmick for votes, he sold out his own message… how is this putting COUNTRY FIRST?
He didnt even properly vet her, he just seemingly woke up after obamas speach and said well were going to lose i guess i better roll the dice…thats right mccain likes to gamble… do you want him gambling with rush? N Korea? Iran?
Can we trust john mccains judgment when his judgment is so reckless?
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 3, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Blame the MEDIA
Blame OBAMA
Blame the left
Blame the terrorists
Blame anyone
but dont blame the man who made his first major decision based on a political gamble.
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 3, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
The Caribou Cutie seems to be
in the last few minutes of her
15 minutes of fame.
McCain may think he has pulled
a cutie on the nation, but the
Cutie he picked is going home.
Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
D`Obama
At least Rev Wright fought risked his life on the frontlines in Vietnam for America but McCain only flew over Vietnam but still got captured.
Now you have two of McCain`s spiritual guides who have never served America but sit in their pews and preach hatred toward fellow Americans.
Of course its Hagee and Parsly.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
David from Texas
shes ready to be president?
lol what qualifications does she have? please go ahead and list them? She has ZERO foregin policy experience, you know taht thing you guys have been saying for months now that obama has too little
well obams foreign policy experience blows hers out of the water
or are you of hte belief that since alaska is close to russia that is all the foreign policy experience she needs?
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 3, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
LOL while you are at it, be sure to copy the info that McSame wants to privatize their social security. I am sure that will be of intereste to the older crowd.
Posted by: Doc DB | September 3, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
The fact that so many see no problem with Ayers – apparently believing he’s “just a guy who lives in Obama’s neighborhood” – proves just how lax and in the tank for Obama the media has been!
Posted by: marylou | September 3, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
The only thing that is a disgrace is John McCain’s pick. He is no longer the maverick of 2000, he has proved he has caved into the right wing Rove’s.
He has put politics first and Country LAST
The McCain of 2000 is gone for good
Posted by: Voting Dem now | September 3, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
McCain supporters are trying to say that if you are not republican then you dont love your country.
I feel very offended by that.
Posted by: Independent | September 3, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
david from texas – you do realize a 4 pt National lead is a landslide in the electoral world right?
You do realize Reagan had less lead right now then Obama does?
I liked Mccain of 2000 but he is not McCain of 2000 any longer
McCain/Palin
POLITICS FIRST, COUNTRY LAST
Posted by: McCain = Bush/Rove | September 3, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
David from texas
it is not a very smart thing to cosider polls as election results.
What makes you think that it is always a strict rule for republicans to jump ahead of the Dems before elections?
Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
The biggest problem I have with Sarah Palin is that her priorities are all wrong. As the mother of a Special Needs infant and a pregnant teenager included in her brood of five, one would think her top priority would be raising her children. Being VP of the US is not the same thing as going to work as a “working mother,” and any comparisons are valid insults to those of us who do work and raise our children, hands-on. How about the women who gave up big positions to mother their children? THEY are the ones to be respected and applauded. Who will raise her children if she is traveling all over the world? Has she even considered how her family would be affected? If she could have been there for her daughter before five months ago, the kid might not be pregnant today. In addition, WHY is her daughter compounding the pregnancy situation by getting married? Is it to save face for her mother? Who advocates teenage marriages in this day and age? Furthermore, I for one do not want McCain making any more decisions that might affect my life as an American. If he allowed this to happen, he is capable of anything. He remains completely responsible for accepting the advice of a bunch of idiots who he appointed to help him find a running mate. To position a mother of five who is completely without maternal instincts to represent our country is too much! I do not think you will find too many women’s groups coming out in support of Palin.
Posted by: Paulette | September 3, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
“Obama has to take responsibility just because Ayers knows him?”
-Keith
Knows him? They are friends, colleagues on boards, etc. They worked together on several projects. Would you work on a project – no matter how noble you think that project might be – w/ a guy who did the things Ayers admitted to doing (not to mention, how he is proud of it, and wished he did more)?? If you would, we’re done here!
Posted by: D'Obama | September 3, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Polls show Obama is expanding his lead. That means McCain`s awful pick has backfired.
Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
NMP, And if Obama is for equal pay how has he demonstrated that by his ACTIONS???? Like I said he claims to be for womens rights but everything he has done has shown the contrary.
Meanwhile my candidate chose a woman as VP and meanwhile the Republican party has boasted the three most high profile and intelligent blacks in recent history Rice, Powell, and Thomas. And also appointed the first woman to the Supreme Court- O’connor. Democrats have done what now? Oh I forgot, they sent Geraldine and Hillary down in flames and selected Mr. Nice guy Edwards who cheated on his wife who was battling cancer. A story which has conveniently gone away. When have the Democrats actually been for woman’s empowerment?
Posted by: joyce | September 3, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
D`Obama
that means McCain also has to take responsibility for larry Craig courting male prostitutes just because he knows him.
Thats the logic you are bringing up.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
What I think is going on here:
–The McCain campaign introduced Sarah Palin as a compelling candidate by emphasizing her biography. Given that this is the case, the media are now vetting that biography. The campaign only have themselves to blame for how the negative information for Palin has emerged. They should have, could have, managed it better.
–The McCain campaign has used “experience” as one of its main arguments against Obama. Obama went ahead and chose Biden, one of the most experienced statesmen in our country, to help him lead if they are elected. Now, McCain picks a VP who has no national or foreign experience. So the media are going to ask, why did her pick her, if experience is so important even by his own admission? By all indications so far, part of her appeal as a candidate is that she will be a good campaigner, a good political choice for the Republican base to rally around. She’s got spunk, they say, and they’re making her into a poster child for their core values. So the media will rightfully ask, given that McCain criticized Obama for just being a celebrity that spoke well, how did he decide it would be advisable to choose a VP for her celebrity and excitability potential? So now the media are evaluating her according to the very terms McCain has put out there these many months: a life story, experience, and seriousness of purpose.
–In addition, what the Obama campaign has put out there is the theme, judgment. Obama was praised by the media for his sound judgment in choosing Biden as VP. Now the media is turning to McCain and Palin and investigating the choice in order to determine what it reveals about McCain’s judgment.
This is why the New York Times and the Washington Post are examining the vetting process she went through. Was it a complete vet? There have been reports to the contrary, that it was very rushed and a last-minute decision. Does that indicate the kind of decision-making we can expect from a President McCain? She may very well prove to be a good choice, but in that case, McCain might just be lucky because it seems like he didn’t vet her fully. Personally, I’d rather have a diligent president than a lucky one.
It’s also a very interesting contrast with the Obama VP pick. We know that the finalists were subject to a complete and thorough vetting. We also know that Obama made his decision several days before the pick was announced. In addition, the Obama campaign had a very compressed schedule to work with because the primary wasn’t over until June. McCain, on the other hand, did not conduct a thorough vetting (his operatives were sent to Alaska on the day Palin was being announced, and as of yesterday they had still not checked the town records of Wasilla, where she was mayor), had several months advantage over Obama because the Republican primary ended much earlier, and yet still didn’t make his decision until the very last minute. I mean, the campaign was still gathering information on her the morning of the day that she was announced.
So the media is absolutely right to ask all these questions. Please keep asking them. If McCain hasn’t fully vetted her, we need the media to. Not because we want to know tawdry details about her personal life, but because we want to know that the person who may be a heartbeat away from the presidency has the judgment, experience, intellect, integrity, and gravity that the position requires. I don’t care if she’s a good campaigner, or interesting, or knows how to field dress a moose. I want to know, can she be president?
Posted by: Angelina | September 3, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
So what Republicans did she “take on”?
Ted Stevens? She threw him under the bus when he was indicted. Before she used him to campaign for her and was director of a 527 for him.
The only house cleaning has been done by the fed arresting Alaska Senators.
Ethics reform? Done by the legislature
The media is scared of Palin, yet the only interview she has granted since being announced was to people magazine.
Someone is scared and its not the press
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Joyce
“ And if Obama is for equal pay how has he demonstrated that by his ACTIONS???? Like I said he claims to be for womens rights but everything he has done has shown the contrary. “
—————————————–
These are facts. Obama has senate voting records to back it. McCain has opposed every one of them.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Lets face it. McCain has made the worst VP pick in US history. He was interviewed Wednesday and named on Friday.
This is not only incompetent but also a display of bad judgment.
Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
“Obama has to take responsibility just because Ayers knows him?”
When the media uses the same amount of resources to investigate the papers released about the Annenberg Challenge as they are using to chase down a seventeen-year old girl’s sex life, then we might know the answer to your question.
The Democrats have become hateful. That is not a change I want anything to do with.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Keith, I doubt very much that McCain holds Larry Craig in such high regard since his incident, nor does he serve on boards, etc. with him.
Same can’t be said for Obama, who knew full well what Ayers was all about when he knocked on his door to seek his guidance when launching his career.
Apples and Oranges!!!
The lack of judgement on Obama’s part is astounding!!
Posted by: D'Obama | September 3, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Krista and exactly what are those facts? Can you name anything?
Posted by: joyce | September 3, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Has anyone noticed that Palin was vetted more by the media in four days than Obama has been in 19 months???
Sure, sure there’s no left-wing media bias (roll eyes).
Posted by: D'Obama | September 3, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Joyce – Let me introduce you to your candidate:
John McCain is one of only a few Senators to earn a Zero percent lifetime rating from Planned Parenthood’s Action Fund, and he only scored that high because the organization doesn’t have a lower rating. Let’s look at how he accomplished this.
McCain is so extremely anti-choice that he believes that Roe was wrongly decided, saying, “I do not support Roe verses Wade. It should be overturned.” (Sen. McCain, Associated Press, February 19, 2007).
He further stated, “If I am fortunate enough to be elected as the President of the United States, I pledge to you to be a loyal and unswerving friend of the right to life movement.” (Statement by Sen. McCain read by Sen. Brownback at the March for Life, Washington, DC, January 22, 2008).
Further, in an interview with George Stephanopoulous on ABC’s This Week, McCain said, “I do believe that it’s very likely or possible that the Supreme Court should, could overturn Roe v. Wade”. (January 19, 2006).
But Senator McCain is also opposed to providing birth control to prevent the need for abortion. Let’s look at his record:
He voted against requiring health care plans to cover birth control (3/22/03).
He voted against comprehensive, medically accurate sex education (7/25/06).
He voted against international family planning funding (3/14/96).
He voted against funding to prevent teen and unintended pregnancies (3/17/05).
He voted against public education for emergency contraception (3/17/05).
And he voted against restoring Medicaid funding that could be used for family planning for low-income women (3/17/05).
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Concerned in Ohio:
He made that big speech in Germany, remember??
Now there’s foreign policy experience for you……………..
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
It’s 1898, Randolph Hearst is alive, and yellow journalism is flourishing.
You saw it with Senator Hillary Clinton during the Democrat Primary, and now you’re seeing it with Governor Sarah Palin in the General Election.
It is apparent by the conduct of the American Media, that it will do everything in its power by any means necessary, to prevent a Woman from being elected to Executive high office in the United States.
In addition, the American Media has fully utilized its leverage and influence with the objective to elect Senator Barak Obama President of the United States, and is working in concert with the Obama Campaign to affect that goal.
Only one question remains:
Will the American Media elect the President in 2008?
Posted by: SIOP | September 3, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
D`Obama
Am judging your statements from your own logic. When you are caught in your own logic all you can say is “but..but..“
BTW McCain has made history by picking the worst running mate. That is bad judgment and I do not want an Alaska separatist as my VP.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Obama has proven he is not the candidate for POTUS. Since his convention, he has only got an 8 pt bounce, where normally, the candidate gets a 12-15 pt bounce in the polls. Even Dukakis, got a 12 pt bounce. This proves that Americans do not want Obama in office….
——————-
Actually this just proves that polls are deceiving and not always right. Maybe when they start polling people with cell phones the polls will be more accurate.
Posted by: d | September 3, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
What makes me laugh is the reaction to the Bristol Palin episode. The very same people who were demonizing the parents of the teens who got pregnant in Glouster, MA are now saying that we shouldn’t hold Sarah and Todd Palin responsible! This is a disgusting double standard.
Posted by: Rick | September 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Sandy B
`He made that big speech in Germany, remember??
Now there’s foreign policy experience for you……………..“
==========================================
No he also met the most powerful leaders in Europe and you decided to ignore that. These same leaders are our key allies. You McCain supporters must learn how to lie.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
d:
So are you trying to say that all voters who have cell phones instead of land lines will be voting for Obama?
Not this one……………….
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
McCain was supposed to be on Larry King but decided to cancel the interview because he didnt know how to defend his awful pick for VP.
We need a tough leader like Obama who is able to face tough questions from the media.
Posted by: Kenny | September 3, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
The fact that Obama supported an FDA-approved contraception insurance plan coverage in Illinois is certainly a positive thing. But did he take a real leadership position on the issue? Did he draft the legislation? No, he did not. In fact, has he ever drafted and promoted meaningful and comprehensive legislation directed toward the betterment of women and children’s lives? Has women’s rights ever been a priority in Obama’s life? I think not.
Posted by: joyce | September 3, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
McCain Campaign “No more Vetting Questions.” The press: Oh ok
Posted by: Thinking | September 3, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Only in a Repuglican America is a Black man who is a Harvard Educated Constitutional Law Scholar, with 8yrs as State Senator and 4 yrs as US Senator who has run a brilliant and ultra successful progressive campaign not ready to lead but a white ultra conservative woman with a BS in journalism and 19 mos as Governor ready on day one…”
Disgusting!
Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
“He also met the most powerful leaders in Europe”
Big deal.
There are no Churchills left to help us out in a world war anymore.
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Let’s ask Rudi’s ex wives and string of mistresses how much respect HE has for women! And, surely somewhere there’s audio of John McCain telling that repugnant Chelsea Clinton joke. And I did hear Rush Limbaugh, Republican God himself, declare Sarah Palin a “BABE”. Sexist much?
Guess that makes all those questions about Barack Obama’s ability Racist.
Posted by: Therealsarah | September 3, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Let’s ask Rudi’s ex wives and string of mistresses how much respect HE has for women! And, surely somewhere there’s audio of John McCain telling that repugnant Chelsea Clinton joke. And I did hear Rush Limbaugh, Republican God himself, declare Sarah Palin a “BABE”. Sexist much?
Guess that makes all those questions about Barack Obama’s ability Racist.
Posted by: Therealsarah | September 3, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Am betting she is going to withdraw. This is an awful pick by McCain which has already backfired. You can spin all you want but nobody will buy that.
Posted by: Krista | September 3, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Some of you guys are funny. Gov. Palin could not balance the Budget of a State of less than 700,000 population. How would She handle the Budget of the whole Country?
When HRC complained of sexism, Sarah Palin accused her of whinning and someone is now looking for Women’s group to defend her.
The arguments being put forward by the GOP are juvenile and infantile.
Since Mccain refused to vet her, Americans are simply helping him to do the vetting of a potential President.
It is fair for the GOP Goons to heap bunch of lies on Obama in the name of Campaign Ads while it is seen chauvinism, if the truth is said about Palin.
Mccain is old and he has done a disservice to the Country by choosing a running mate that has been discovered to be a failed Mother, a Vindictive Woman and a Secessionist who is likely to become the President if something untowards happens to Mccain.
I should think that a responsible Presidential Candidate should first and foremost, consider the Interest of the Country in this period of unprecedented Economy downturn, heavy balance of payment deficit and challenges to America’s power from abroad, to choose a Vice-President that would be able to handle the affairs of State at any time.
But for Mccain, the votes and contribution of the Social Conservatives and the Evangelicals are more important than nominating a Vice-Presidential Candidate that would be accepted and respected around the World if perhaps, She steps into the big shoes of POTUS.
I am scared and I’m sure everybody who wants the best for this Country is scared.
It appears that the GOP GOvernment are bent on pushing the Country further aground.
They intend to finish the Job George Bush started.
Posted by: owen jacob | September 3, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Considering Obama has voted to fund the war and to extend the PATRIOT Act, his speech at an anti-war rally in Chicago in 2002 is meaningless. Besides, He told the Chicago Tribune in 2004 that his position on the war was basically the same as Bush’s. Trying to appeal to those war supporters outside Chicago while running for the Senate, see Obama says what he needs to say to get into office.
Posted by: joyce | September 3, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
God must have changed his mind… again. Women are supposed to stay at home and raise the children and let men do the leading. It’s against scripture for a woman to be in a position of power. Just ask the Assembly of God, Catholics or the Southern Baptists. You know the ones at the forefront of pushing the religious agenda in this country. We can be thankful though for the fact she doesn’t believe in sex education or birth control and has a stance of “abstinence only”… After all that’s the only real way to curb teen pregnancy.
Posted by: Texas Lil | September 3, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
“The very same people who were demonizing the parents of the teens who got pregnant in Glouster, MA are now saying that we shouldn’t hold Sarah and Todd Palin responsible!”
Umm… that would be the media, Rick, in the first case, and not the media in the second case. Nice try.
Lay off the daughter. The Democrats are becoming a hateful lot and it is embarassing to watch.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
d:
So are you trying to say that all voters who have cell phones instead of land lines will be voting for Obama?
Not this one……………….
Posted by: SandyB | Sep 3, 2008 10:57:58 AM
—————–
Not at all. I am saying that polls are not accurate since they don’t poll cell phones which have become the norm for millions. Many do not have landlines anymore.
Posted by: d | September 3, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
“You mean like Obama’s boycott of Fox News?”
O’Reilly announced last night that Obama was scheduled to appear on The Factor this week. If he keeps to that, it should prove interesting.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
“Not at all. I am saying that polls are not accurate since they don’t poll cell phones which have become the norm for millions.”
The pollsters know that and correct for it. Thanks for playing.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
I beg to differ.
Palin was a great pick by McCain.
I can’t remember the last time I read through the news channels’ political pages on the Internet and didn’t see “Obama” as the headline in practically every story.
Although not all of the stories are positive, Palin has certainly knocked Obama out of the headlines………
I bet more people tune in tonight for her speech than did for Obama’s last week………………………..
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Joyce – Here’s the candidate, Obama, you claim does nothing for women:
___________________________________________________
Preventing Unwanted Pregnancy:
Barack Obama is an original co-sponsor of legislation to expand access to contraception, health information and preventive services to help reduce unintended pregnancies. Introduced in January 2007, the Prevention First Act will increase funding for family planning and comprehensive sex education that teaches both abstinence and safe sex methods. The Act will also end insurance discrimination against contraception, improve awareness about emergency contraception, and provide compassionate assistance to rape victims.
PREVENTING VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
Reducing Domestic Violence:
One in four women will experience domestic violence in her lifetime. Family violence accounted for 11 percent of all violence between 1998 and 2002. Barack Obama introduced legislation to combat domestic violence by providing $25 million a year for partnerships between domestic violence prevention organizations and Fatherhood or Marriage programs to train staff in domestic violence services, provide services to families affected by domestic violence, and to develop best practices in domestic violence prevention.
Strengthening Domestic Violence Laws:
Approximately 1,400 women a year – four every day – die in the United States as a result of domestic violence. And 132,000 women report that they have been victims of a rape or attempted rape, and it is estimated that an even greater number have been raped, but do not report it. Senator Obama co-sponsored and helped reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act. Signed into law in January 2006, the bill funds and helps communities, nonprofit organizations, and police combat domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. The legislation establishes a sexual assault services program and provides education grants to prevent domestic violence.
Fighting Gender Violence Abroad:
The genocide in Darfur has had particularly devastating consequences for women. Tens of thousands of women have been killed, raped, and displaced since the conflict began in 2003. Barack Obama has been a leading voice in Washington urging the end of genocide in Sudan. He worked with Senator Sam Brownback (R-KS) on the Darfur Peace and Accountability Act, a version of which was signed into law. Obama has traveled to the United Nations to meet with Sudanese officials and visited refugee camps on the Chad-Sudan border to raise international awareness of the ongoing humanitarian disaster there. He also worked with Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) to secure $20 million for the African Union peacekeeping mission.
ECONOMIC ISSUES
Fighting for Pay Equity: (McCain opposes)
Despite decades of progress, women still make only 77 cents for every dollar a man makes. A recent study estimates it will take another 47 years for women to close the wage gap with men at Fortune 500 corporate offices. Barack Obama believes the government needs to take steps to better enforce the Equal Pay Act, fight job discrimination, and improve child care options and family medical leave to give women equal footing in the workplace.
Expanding Paid Medical Leave: Today, three-out-of-four low-wage workers have no paid sick leave. It is fundamentally unfair that a single mom playing by the rules can get fired or lose wages because her child gets sick. Barack Obama supports efforts to guarantee workers seven days of paid sick leave per year, a moderate proposal that should not impose too onerous a burden on employers.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
god forbid something happens to McCain before the election. Does this mean Palin will take over for him as the presidential nominee. We are in big trouble if this is the case.
Posted by: annie | September 3, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
The media does not like being suprised, maybe McCain should have leaked the Gov’s name ealier in the week. The US Weekly cover and OK mag cover though are clear examples of the media bias that are being brought up in this blog. The conservative media have been looking into Obama’s past with little being picked up by the rest of the media, with the exception of Rev. Wright, but they never, never have said an ill word about Obama’s daughters. Watching these attacks should worry people if Gov. Palin’s kids are fair game the next in line will be the media and their families do they want that?
Posted by: Jim | September 3, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
According to McCain and his supporters if you are not republican then you dont put your first. This is very offensive.
Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
“You mean like Obama’s boycott of Fox News?”
He’s being interviewed by O’Reilly on Thurs (I wonder if the ratings will be higher than for McCain’s speech).
Meanwhile McCain’s VP pick has yet to speak to reporters other than people magazine.
And McCain himself canceled cna interview with Larry King after one of his spox got nailed to the wall claiming that Palin leading the national guard meant she had foreign policy experience.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Palin won’t withdraw because she is not a weak woman. And as a woman why would you want her to do that anyway? If Bill Clinton can stay in office despite the Lewinsky fiasco, I think Palin can survive whatever is dished out. Yes Krista you really are for the empowerment of women.
Posted by: joyce | September 3, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
What is going on is media bias and rampant sexism. Disgusting!
Time to square up and face off.
Posted by: smith | September 3, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
“You mean like Obama’s boycott of Fox News?”
He’s being interviewed by O’Reilly on Thurs (I wonder if the ratings will be higher than for McCain’s speech).
Meanwhile McCain’s VP pick has yet to speak to reporters other than people magazine.
And McCain himself canceled cna interview with Larry King after one of his spox got nailed to the wall claiming that Palin leading the national guard meant she had foreign policy experience.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
“…I am saying that polls are not accurate since they don’t poll cell phones…”
Which COULD mean that McCain might actually be ahead instead of Obama.
Do you think only Obama supporters have cell phones just because they were all waiting around for that exciting 3 a.m. text message like good little sheep??
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Jim
Are you talking about Rev Wright? At least Rev Wright fought risked his life on the frontlines in Vietnam for America but McCain only flew over Vietnam but still got captured.
Now you have two of McCain`s spiritual guides who have never served America but sit in their pews and preach hatred toward fellow Americans.
Of course its Hagee and Parsly.
Posted by: Kenny | September 3, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Ok so far the RNC had their party’s highest office holder in the land appear via video link before prime time and gave the prime slot to a former Democrat.
The theme of the evening was we’re all mavericks now.
Aren’t you guys proud of being Republicans?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Joyce – I did go to their page because the official Congressional record page was way too long. It matches and perhaps you should take a look at it before claiming things that are untrue; unless, of course you agree with McCain’s campaign manager that this election is NOT about the issues which is clear from your post.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Joyce
Obama worked across the aisle with Sen Lugar to drafted the nuclear disarmament bill between the US and Russia to keep nuclear weapons out of dangerous hands.
Obama was also a constitutional lawyer and prof. McCain is a carrier politician.
Posted by: Mark | September 3, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
The pollsters know that and correct for it. Thanks for playing.
Posted by: len | Sep 3, 2008 11:12:08 AM
————–
Actually they don’t. There have been numerous articles on this. I can give you links if you like. Any polls with cell phone info is purely speculation.
Posted by: d | September 3, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
So again, what are Palin’s great accomplishments at reform?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
What’s really going on here:
McCain’s barely vetted VP rollout is unravelling due to its haste, superficiality, and incredibly poor judgment.
The majority of the media and punditry are appalled at his big mistake.
Posted by: Danny | September 3, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
The only reform Palin knows is firing people who disagree with her.
Posted by: Keith | September 3, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
“Which COULD mean that McCain might actually be ahead instead of Obama.
Do you think only Obama supporters have cell phones just because they were all waiting around for that exciting 3 a.m. text message like good little sheep??”
Cell only use demographics tend to be younger include more minorities and tend to be renters vs homeowners.
Not exactly McCain’s crowd.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Jake,
What do i think? I think republicans are hypocrite…they went after Hillary with full assort on her character. Now, they are asking us to be fair to Palin. Was Giuliani fair to Hillary? Was Sean Hannity fair to Michelle Obama? Was Rush Limbaugh fair to Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama?
As far as i am concern, the Republicans cannot eat their cake and want to have it as well. Let’s face it, if Obama had picked Gov Keane, the whole republicans echo machine will be yelling.
Posted by: Bee | September 3, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Palin said she would take on corruption and she did. Obama said he would take on corruption and he was cozy with them and in return got a house with their help for 300,000.00 less the market price!!! GOOD TALK BUT NO DEED IS CHEAP!
Posted by: Sean | September 3, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
America is changing but the republican party is not. Did anybody see the faces and speakers at the convention last night?
Posted by: Weiss | September 3, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
What did Plain do to reform Alaska?
Or is it just a figment of the McCain imagination like her Commander in Chief experience as head of the AK National Guard?
Or like her international travel that includes two countries visiting US bases and one country duty free shopping.
What are Palin’s reform accomplishments?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Samantha
Trinity UCC is a very vibrant and well-respected church in Chicago and is attended and praised by all races. It does more work for the community than any other church in the area. Some of its 8000 members may get a little carried away with their rhetoric, but that happens in most churches.
Reality may not always be the same as the picture you have formed in your mind with very little evidence.
Posted by: jock59801 | September 3, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
I have a feeling that all of the people who are having the most negatives to say about Palin’s record in Alaska are of the minority who DON’T approve of her.
I’ve noticed that the members of the media who are still in Alaska trying to unravel her complicated story had much different stories to tell on Day #2, after they had actually gone around and spoken to everyday people, than the stories they were getting on Day #1, when they were only looking for the dirt on the alleged scandals.
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“Actually they don’t”
Actually they do.
Links don’t mean much, BTW. This is the web. I can give you links to any number of topics that are patently false starting with the Daily KOS coverage of Palin’s youngest and work our way down to Obama’s time in Indonesia, his brother’s poverty, the killings in Kenya, and so on. Then you have to figure out which are false and which aren’t.
It does mean you might want to vette the polls though. Polls haven’t been very accurate this year, I agree. As someone else said, McCain may be ahead but I suspect they are dead even. This is a polarized country.
If there is a noticeable sea change in this election, it is that ALL of the candidates have public flaws. We seem to be evolving past the need to vote only for saints and that is a sign of maturity not seen before in an American Presidential election.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
I see that Obama’s media toadies are out for Palin’s hide because her 17 year old daughter is pregnant. As memory serves, Obama’s mother was both unmarried and pregnant with “The One” when she was 17. I find it ironic that the media ignores this fact when they are hounding Palin.
BTW: If The One actually becomes president does this mean we can say with certainty that the president is a B*****d?
Posted by: David H | September 3, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
David H
Obama mentioned his mother’s youth when he was asking people to back off the Bristol Palin story. And his parents got married, as far as what he was told; and if not, who cares?
Posted by: jock59801 | September 3, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
So can anyone tell what reforms Palin enacted to fight corruption?
Or is this a Tucker Bounds moment for rw commentators?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
The Dem libs are scared to death….a qualified female Governor more qualified than their top of the ticket community oranizer. Dems and their attack media/bloggers spreading rumors and slime better start thinking of BACKLASH with 54% of the female population. This used to be a generational election to me, but now I’m thinking it may come down to a battle of the sexes. And for those who are so excited to vote for the unqualified black man, now there will be millions of us excited to vote for a qualified female VP…..she compliments McCain perfectly, what a great pick!
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN
Posted by: Debra | September 3, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
how did mccain think palin would be a smart choice to handle foreign affairs when she just got her first passport LAST YEAR! in fact, she had to finally get her passport because she had to go to Kuwait and Germany as a part of her Gubertatorial duties… in other words, she was forced out of her alaskan comfort-zone after 44 years. she hasn’t even been to Russia… even though she’s BY it (which is the McCain campaign’s selling point).
apparently republicans are enamored with mediocrity and defend it. just look at the last 8 years.
Posted by: pat | September 3, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
“Why is it the only stories we find about Obama’s family residing in Africa seem to come from European markets?”
Why don’t we hear stories of McCain’s first wife or Cindy McCain’s half siblings?
And why can’t anyone tall me some of Palin’s accomplishments at fighting corruption
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
SandyB
The media sent journalists to Indonesia and Kenya many months ago. All that is done. The only reason we are hearing so much about Palin now is because it was such a surprise pick amd none of these things had been talked about before. I think it is all a bit silly, myself, but the media will go after anyone, usually urged on by rumors being spread by extremists.
Posted by: jock59801 | September 3, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Good Morning America had a piece just this morning talking about McCain’s first wife and their three children.
Apparently one of his older sons works in the “Family” beer business.
Can’t be too much feuding going on.
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Debra,
John McCain applied for a marriage license for his mistress while still married to his 1st wife.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
The press is being unfair to Palin and that is definite. The press was unfair to Hillary clinton and when Katy Coruic had the AUDACITY to state so that skank Olbermann crucified her for it. All of you Obama people won’t put up with one crumb of this kind of treatment towards your candidate otherwise you scream like someone is slamming your foot in a door. But it is okay for his machine and his supporters to pick on anyone they want to and everyone has to accept it and feel that that is the way it is in politics. Talk about double standards! I guess if Hillary and Palin were born with a fruit basket between their legs than everything would be fine. Obama says that families are off limits yet he is running a commercial now that claims McCain represents Country Club Politics because he could not give a definitive answer as to how many homes he owned. The reason he could not give the answer was because the homes are his wife’s homes and wife’s families homes. Her father came to this country with nothing, much like Obama, and built up a huge business for himself. McCain wanted to be sure whose name the homes were in before answering and he was crucified for saying he had to check on it. Did any of you Obama supporters ever see the inside of Obama’s house? It is like a museum inside so for him to point the finger at McCain and say Country Club Politics, etc. is very hypocritical. Obama and his wife try to act like one of the common people and they are no more common people than anyone else running for office in politics! I hope he loses big time in November!
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 3, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
The only way McCain could live up to the term “maverick” was to pick Lieberman. What a shake up that would have been. And there would be no way that people could compare him to Bush after that. But no, he had to pander to the women. He gave in to pressure. What a woose.
Posted by: zz | September 3, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
The ‘Republican talking points” to sell Palin is her ‘Executive Experience” – They are attempting to use that against Obama ( hi straw – meet grasp). If that is now the new threshold can someone tell me what McCain’s ‘Executive experience is?
Posted by: Paige | September 3, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Wasn’t it Gov. Palin that called Senator Clinton a “whiner” for complaining about allegedly sexist treatment from the press and from Obama supporters? Why has the McCain/Palin campaign wrapped itself in the sexism flag now that her own positions and ethical conduct are under scrutiny?
And when will Gov. Palin be made available for a press conference or interviews by neutral press? That hasn’t happened since she was nominated (unless you call People magazine the “press”). If she’s ready to be President on Day One, I would assume she’s not afraid to answer journalists’ questions, like the other three candidates on the ticket.
Posted by: Reality-based | September 3, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
OBAMA SUPPORTERS ARE NOT THE ONLY ONES WITH CELL PHONES. I am supporting John McCain and I have a cell phone. So, I think you are right. When the cell phones are counted in the polls we will see the true results.I have to laugh. Many Obama supporters are still living home with mommy and daddy or even older supporters are living with mommy and daddy yet they think they know who should be President. How about them learning not to sponge off of mommy and daddy first! lololol
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 3, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Samantha asks :So can anyone tell us what reforms Obama enacted to fight corruption besides getting Rezko to buy him a house at below market value?
__________________________________________
I am happy to help – this should get us started:
Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act
Honest Leadership and Open Gov. Act
Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimadation Act
Ethics Reform
Posted by: Paige | September 3, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Tell them like it is Rudy!
Posted by: Mack | September 3, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
The republics motto has also been to divide the country up any way possible in order to win an election. They do it with social issues all the time.
THEIR GOAL IS TO CRY SEXISM AS LOUD AND OFTEN AS POSSIBLE IN AN ATTEMPT TO CALL TO WOMEN.
Posted by: Samantha | September 3, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
“Some of its 8000 members may get a little carried away with their rhetoric, but that happens in most churches. Reality may not always be the same as the picture you have formed in your mind with very little evidence.”
The problems with TUCC are not related to their excellent community work but to their official endorsements of Black Liberation Theology and radical separatists such as Louis Farrakhan.
Whatever you may think about Palin’s positions on Creationism and abortion, they pale in contrast to the positions of the liberation theologists and the hate filled rants of Farrakhan.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
“How many corrupt pols do you think Obama turned in while he was in Chicago?”
He made a real estate deal with Rezko while he was undeer indictment. Judgment to lead? Had to get the million dollar mansion whether he could afford it or not.
Posted by: Mack | September 3, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Many Obama supporters are still living home with mommy and daddy or even older supporters are living with mommy and daddy yet they think they know who should be President. How about them learning not to sponge off of mommy and daddy first! lololol
Posted by: Mary Anne | Sep 3, 2008 12:02:28 PM
You really think so. LOL Oh, ok. You just keep on thinking that.
Posted by: zz | September 3, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Palin as a reformer is all image and little reality.
Word coming out of Alaska today is that Gov. Palin filed an ethics violation against herself. Now while a funny headline, the reason is more insidious. Right now there is an independant commission looking into the abuse of power charges against her, and by making the charge against herself she wants the state ethics board to rule on the matter. The kicker – all ethics board members were appointed by Sarah Palin.
She’s now stonewalling the independent committee saying that the official state ethics board (filled with her appointees) should be the only body looking into this matter going forward.
She’s trying to work the system.
Posted by: Jonze | September 3, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Samantha-Obama has met with the heads of state of countries in the Middle East and Europe. He’s met with our commanders in Iraq and Afghanistan. He’s traveled with Sen. Lugar to secure loose nuclear weapons in Russia. We all know his policies regarding the Middle East, Russia, Venezuela, etc. We know nothing of Gov. Palin’s foreign policy experience, we don’t know her thoughts on foreign policy, and neither does she – in a recent interview, she said she hadn’t given Iraq much thought.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Ohio – All of them.
Posted by: Paige | September 3, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
I pretty sure that instead of a “bounce” the GOP will be getting a dip in the polls.
The GOP’s bright young history making star can only come out and regurgitate stale old GOP talking points; More Government regulation of a woman’s uterus, more guns, less taxes, and by the way since 2006 we are now against earmarks and special interest money. She was for it before she was against it. Hmmm….Why does the GOP convention seem like an old Lawrence Welk re-run?
Posted by: Old Stale Odor from St. Paul | September 3, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“Palin blew the whistle on her own party chairman that resulted in him being fined $12k.”
For months, she had been receiving complaints about Ruedrich from staff, from a fellow commissioner and from the public, and she had been making her own observations as well. But though she carried the title “ethics supervisor” over the AOGCC and chaired the commission, she said she had little authority over the other two commissioners, who serve six-year terms and can only be fired for cause. She had been unable to affect Ruedrich’s behavior, she said.
Much later, when Ruedrich settled state ethics charges June 22 by paying a record $12,000 civil fine and admitting wrongdoing, Palin said she finally felt some measure of vindication for bucking Ruedrich and members of her party. Over the months leading up to the settlement, Ruedrich had been saying the accusations were overblown, while other Republicans, including Murkowski, complained Ruedrich was unfairly targeted, primarily by the news media.
Originally muzzled by the confidentiality provisions of the state ethics law and unable to explain publicly what she had tried to do about Ruedrich, Palin found herself attacked from both sides: Ruedrich’s opponents accused her of complicity with him, and his allies said she was providing ammunition for Democrats. She quit the commission in frustration on Jan. 16, months before the state’s secret investigation and its formal charges became public.
IOW, Palin had little to do with it.
When it got hot in the kitchen, she quit.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
From lifelong democrat Susan Estrich …
What they’re doing to her………..and I mean friends of yours and mine….what they’re saying, second guessing her prenatal care……..with her youngest child….. even going so far as to suggest she took unnecessary risks………..maybe she was even responsible for the Down’s Syndrome………this whole business of saying maybe she was covering up for her teenage daughter’s pregnancy….they are dumping all over the daughter…..I find it Really offensive….and I think a lot of women in particular….who ended up supporting Hillary because they were so offended by the sexism may well be offended by what they see as the piling on of Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
I don’t know about you, but I’d love to have some of whatever it is that the WSJ editorial board has been smoking to give them such a distorted, unrealistic view of reality!
Posted by: chuck | September 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
I am going to ask a non-political question. Can someone please tell me what it means and does when someone post a stop post with a time and * ?
Posted by: Paige | September 3, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
I see that there is proof that the libs can be broken down to 2 groups – Drones and Elitists
Of which Obama is an Elitist and the drones are those that accuse the Republicans of things that the Dems do in the wide open!
The Republicans have done more for Minorities and Women then the Dems could dream of.
Posted by: spock | September 3, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“If that is now the new threshold can someone tell me what McCain’s Executive experience is?”
Start with his stint as commanding officer of the Navy’s largest squadron, the Replacement Air Group in Jacksonville, Fla. after his time in physical therapy on being repatriated after the VietNam war. The Florida unit was sub-par when he arrived. The men who served with him in that command refer to his skills as nearly ‘magical’ in taking an accident plagued unit with half of its fleet disabled to its first meritorious unit citation with all ships in the air.
There’s more if you want to read.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
There is going to be a huge backlash against both the Dems and the media for their misbehavior during this election, just as the antics of Bush has caused a backlash against the Repubs these past years.
The Dems aren’t doing themselves proud, but instead actually outdoing even the Repubs for seeing who can behave the lowest, while the media actually makes Pravda look like a stalwart of the truth.
Posted by: OxyCon | September 3, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Debra: So your a Hillary supporter now for Palin. What does Palin represent on abortion,birth control, sex education,that would even come close to what Hillary stands for?
Posted by: linda n carolina | September 3, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
“He made a real estate deal with Rezko while he was under indictment.”
Obama bought his house in June 2005.
Rezko was indicted in Oct 2006.
Simple facts that are easily verified.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
From Amy D. Goldstein
It’s fascinating to me that it’s the Democrats, and especially Democrat women are attacking John McCain’s choice of Gov. Sarah Palin. Their criticisms boil down to three tangential categories
1. Criticizing her choice to have a down syndrome baby
2. Casting dispersions on her because her 17-year old daughter is pregnant and will keep the baby and marry the father
3. Objecting to her being a mother and Governor or VP
What happened to women’s liberation? What happened to choice (that usually means A or B, not just A)? What happened to equality?
It seems that the Republican Party is more accepting of mothers who work and of not-so-perfect family situations. The Democrats seem to be stuck in a 1950′s time-warp where mothers must necessarily stay home (perhaps to live off welfare checks?), all children must be perfect (or hidden from society), and unplanned pregnancies must be quickly and quietly terminated.
Posted by: Aston | September 3, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Samantha-If you are not a”partybot”, why are you so defensive about the facts? You don’t know who I am and would be shocked if you did. America has watched Obama on the National/International stage for over 2 years, 22 debates, countless interviews and enormous vetting. Over 18 million people voted for him and almost that many more for the Democratic platform. McCain PICKED Palin. I plan to watch her tonight, but it does not change her record or the fact she has not been vetted.
Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
“Find some neutral press and she probably will!”
So she’s ready to be President and face down people like Putin but needs a friendly venue in which to answer questions.
Obama is going on O’Reilly.
McCain runs away from larry King.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Why do the media have to pull out the kid gloves for Palin and why should she be cut a break? The media has beat Obama up from day one and he and his family are continuously scrutinized. So we can jump all over him but it is sexism if people ask questions about this woman’s past and political stance? What hogwash! This is all so hypocritical. If she is so ready then she should be able to get into the rink with the heavy weights! Her credibility is in question and our country is at stake, I don’t think this is a time to bottle feed, burp and change Palin’s baby diapers! You want to role with the big boys; you get the big boy questions and leave the sexism at home. Didn’t she say all of Hillary’s and PUMA’s whining doesn’t help women? So let her live up to her comment! The Republican so called evangelicals are a bunch of self indulgent hypocritical imps!
Obama/Biden 08-16
Posted by: Past | September 3, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
“Also note, that some how magically, Rezkos wife had 30k cash on hand and a net worth of -30k.”
Net worth is probably like the McCain set up, ya know where’s hes the kept man but nothing is in his name.
“But yet she managed to snag a 600k piece of property, just to flip it back to Obama for a huge loss.”
She sold 1/6 of the property at 1/6 of the price she paid.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Thanks for posting actual facts Samantha.
Though two things should be noted:
The Obama’s made more than one offer and their last offer was accepted. This was June of 2005 (months after the peak and the start of price declines) and the house had been on the market for awhile.
The Obama’s paid 1/6 the price of what Mrs. Rezko paid for 1/6 of the land.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
A more cynical version: there’s some jealousy in play here.
Posted by: Julian | September 3, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Way to rely on thoroughly discredited Corsi for your continuing Rezko scandal!
Meanwhile John McCain’s foreign policy adviser is a registered foreign agent paid to lobby for Georgia.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Sarah Palin will do well with those small town Americans that Obama thinks are bitter and clinging to guns and religion, AND Hillary supporters who saw them gang bang her too.
I see BACKLASH coming, if the Obots, paid and otherwise keep it up.
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR McCAIN/PALIN!
Posted by: Debra | September 3, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
So the act of Corsi mentioning it makes it untrue”
Considering he is thoroughly discredited liar and bigot and you rely upon him as your main source(or rw simply repeating his charge), I would say yes.
Its funny how the left blogosphere was cast as mean recently.
Corsi’s racist rants on FreeRepublic were considered par for the course.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Debra I am bitter because this country has gone to hell with the republicans running it.
Posted by: zz | September 3, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
“Thats just like believing that the act of running for President makes you qualified for President.”
Actually it does. Its not the only act certainly but otherwise how does one qualify for the Presidency if one does not run for it?
McCain has ran and had his qualifications vetted by a primary process.
Obama and Joe Biden have done the same.
Palin’s qualifications are handed out as GOP talking points.
And even those aren’t very good because they just started to vet her on Wed last week.
McCain 1st executive decision was a rushed and uninformed one. Probably because he was in a panic about his campaign. You don’t change the game if you think you are winning.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Dear Mayor Noun…Verb…09/11 -
We should all be afraid of a potential President who makes the most important decision of his campaign on information provided the day before and then blames the media when the truth about his nominee starts oozing out. We’ve been here before and look where it’s gotten us. It’s pure Bush administration…screw something up and then lie, distract, and divide. Enough.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 3, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
Why is John McCain afraid of Larry King?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Ryan C
Why is Larry King afraid of John McCain?
Posted by: america-centric | September 3, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Her office in downtown Anchorage sits beside the ConocoPhillips building. “When I look every day, the big oil company’s building is right out there next to me, and it’s quite a reminder that we should have mutually beneficial relationships with the oil industry,” she said recently. Most people in the Alaskan environmental community see her as an ally of Big Oil, willing to set aside both science and the public good to benefit the industry.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
“Why is Larry King afraid of John McCain?”
He isn’t.
McCain is the one who canceled because Samantha Brown asked Tucker Bounds a question about Palin that Tucker could not answer.
Palin has yet to speak with any reporter outside of People magazine.
McCain is giving his 1st national interview (other than Leno) tonite since going into hiding from the press after his houses gaffe.
Meanwhile Obama is going on O’Reilly on Thurs.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Where are the feminists?? Seriously, funny.
The feminists are voting for a ticket that actually believes in feminism. Not a ticket that tried a ridiculous pandering gimmick with a woman who holds no feminist values whatsoever.
Posted by: Funny | September 3, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
“Corsi’s racist rants on FreeRepublic were considered par for the course. ”
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 3, 2008 12:54:33 PM
___________________
hmmmmmmm
Anything anti- B O is automatically labeled “racist”.
We should add this mis-begotten anomaly to the new book of political change!
Posted by: america-centric | September 3, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
If Palin has the experience
that Republicans are attributing
to her, they also to have to
explain why she could not even
describe the duties of the
vice president in a recent
tv interview.
Running on and on about experience
when you cannot even answer an
elementary question about the
job for which you have just been
selected does not wash.
Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
This is getting funnier by the day. The republicans sound like a bunch of whiners. They are kidding themselves that this ticket will help with the women independents out there. All the polls out show women just aren’t buying into this. It has nothing to do with working mothers. It has to do with the economy and the supreme court. The repubs are pushing this story line, not the dems.
The Who said it best, “won’t be fooled again.”
Posted by: That's not pandering we can believe in | September 3, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
BHO & Biden are toast! Love to see all the hate-posts here – shows just how scared you are! Love it, love it! You are all saying that Sarah is just like BHO – so why don’t you just vote for her!
Yes, Mc Can, and Sarah, Sarah, Sarah!!!
Posted by: Beckie | September 3, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Ryan:
That is an outright lie:
“McCain is the one who canceled because Samantha Brown asked Tucker Bounds a question about Palin that Tucker could not answer. ”
I WATCHED Samantha pushing Tucker with pointed questions about Sarah which were intended to show her in poor light.
I WATCHED as TUCKER nobly extricated and acquitted himself with honest and unbiased answers which gave an a more truthful picture of the vice presidential candidate.
I do not know what it is McCain was supposed to have cancelled B U T
I D O know that whatever it was, there was NO reason for it to be based on this this particular issue!
Posted by: america-centric | September 3, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Palin will be delivering
her withdrawal speech
tonight and heading back
home.
That’s the best thing
Ms. Incompetent can do
and get out of the
Lower 49.
Posted by: anon | September 3, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
So posting racist and anti semitic comments and appearing on white nationalist radio is ok?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I can’t wait for Obama to be president so I can quit my job and get free things! Free health insurance finally!
Posted by: greg | September 3, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Why does Sarah Palin’s husband hate America?
Posted by: Mary, MI | September 3, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
The real question isn’t where are the feminists, where’s the decency? “Babies Lies & Scandals” says Lies … what lie has been told? Jan Wenner & crew’s liberal bent is showing through – they could have just said “Babies & Scandals” and left it that. Instead, they’re at the forefront of a liberal stampede that’s implying the woest, spreading allegations as fact, actually calling for paternity testing on Sara Palin’s baby, release of confidential medical information, poring over photos to size baby bumps at different times. For anyone who thinks they are for human decency, privacy rights, and compassion – why aren’t you more outraged that this is the state of your mainstream media?
The Obama bias was always in the air because it made for a great story (and that sells), but frankly, its beginning to stink up the room.
Posted by: LeeLee | September 3, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Samantha Brown
is the Travel Channel Queen, a perky blonde with a whacked sense of humor.
Campbell Brown
is the CNN anchor who went into the tank early for Obama and has yet to crack a single joke that is funny.
Posted by: len | September 3, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
If Palin has closed the “enthusiasm gap”, doesn’t that mean that conservatives aren’t voting for McCain, but for Palin? SHE is essentially the head of the ticket now. What does that say about John McCain?
Posted by: Naveen | September 3, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Corsi is not ok. But just because he repeated pre-existing information doesn’t discredit the factual basis of that information.
If Corsi says the sky is blue, does that mean the sky isn’t blue?
Posted by: p0s3r | September 3, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Naveen:
Good thought. And, I agree. The social conservatives see Sarah Palin as the future of the party. They’re enthused because McCain chose someone who’s a radical pro-lifer like they are.
Posted by: Mary, MI | September 3, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
anon:
Don’t you mean “Lower 48?”
Did you attend school with Obama?
Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Oh Brady. The writer is a well-known Palin critic, who took sides in the Palin vs Librarian issue. Not exactly an innocent bystander.
Posted by: Just | September 3, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Real men like McCain aren’t intimidated by strong women.
Pretty much sums up why Obama didn’t choose Hillary.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 3, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The media and blogger attacks on Palin will backfire if they continue.
I think Palin is great, even if I don’t share every single belief she has. We agree on the big picture.
I do look forward to 2012, and an exciting presidential race between Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin.
Wouldn’t THAT be historic?
Posted by: KB | September 3, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
look, if all the supposed controversies that obama had to go through were condensed to five days it would look a lot like this–but probably even worse. how long was the media stuck on reverend wright? “proud of america?” i hope journalists understand that the reason scrutiny is so high is because no one knows anything about her, so everything is coming out fast.
Posted by: phi | September 3, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
We aren’t there her because it is evident her policies are not there for us. Feminists are intelligent women that care about the direction of our country, are concerned with the legacy we are leaving our children, and embrace motherhood and career knowing that there is a delicate balance between the two for neither area to suffer. Maybe the Feminists have this one figured out already…despite her gender, she is bad for our nation and our future!
Posted by: Amy T | September 3, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
“Real men like McCain aren’t intimidated by strong women”
How would McCain even know? He met her once before picking her as VP.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
“Did you attend school with Obama?”
That’s not fair.
Not everyone can get their BA in journalism from the venerated Univ of Idaho.
Or finish in the literal bottom five of their graduating class.
Oh wait. That’s the Republicans.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 3, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Obama has no foreign policy experience or executive experience.
Palin has run a business, a city and a state. Obama has run his mouth.
Notice during the Dem convention that not one person could get up on stage and talk about what Obama accomplished as a community agitator.
Posted by: Sarah for president | September 3, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
It is truly sad how we have all descended into a battle of red vs blue, left vs right, republican vs democrat. People, the game is rigged, the fix is in, and it doesn’t matter who gets elected, the American people get hosed. While we argue over who is correct, and call each other names, the government of the wealthy, by the special interests and for big corporations is laughing all the way to the bank. Think I’m wrong? Write a letter to your senator and see what happens. Maybe a form letter response if you’re lucky. More likely no response, unless you included a large “campaign” donation with your letter. Go ahead. prove me wrong, if you can.
Posted by: Steve Bateman | September 3, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
anon,
the Iraquis did NOT agree with Barack’s original plan. And we didnt implement it. Wake up and think for yourself.
Posted by: Keepyourheelsdown | September 3, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
What’s really going on is that people are freaking out about Palin. 1 in 3 VPs have gone on to become President. She has a 1 in 3 chance of becoming President and people in her own party have never met her. Didn’t even know how to pronounce her name!
So the media is vetting her, literally. People are scrambling to find out who she is so they can feel safe with her being a heartbeat away from the Presidency.
Posted by: cincyr | September 3, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm