By Julia Hoppock

Sep 3, 2008 5:30pm

Sexism, Sexism, Sexism

ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf reports from St. Paul, Minn.: Six Republican women, including the former governor of Massachusetts and Sen. John McCain’s top adviser accused Democrats and supporters of Sen. Barack Obama of what they called demeaning, sexist smears against the Republican vice presidential nominee, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

In arguing that Palin should be judged on the merits of her executive experience (she’s not currently, they said), the women, in a press conference at the Republican convention, used the word "sexism" or "sexist" no fewer than 12 times, and invoked what they called the sexism suffered by Sen. Hillary Clinton and several others.

McCain top adviser and former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina said she has talked to Democrats about how "disappointed they were in their own party for not standing up to the sexist smears suffered by Hillary Clinton" during the Democratic primary race.

Fiorina complained that Democrats are trying to write Palin off as a "showhorse, not a workhorse."

"Liberal Web sites are accusing Palin with faking a pregnancy … being a nazi sympathizer … associating with fringe groups … and supermarket tabloids shout about babies, lies and scandal."

Asked later why it was sexist to question her political affiliations, Fiorina said those things in themselves aren’t all sexist, but she wants to have a debate on Palin’s track record. In the meantime, she said the word "sexist" again.

Asked if she would have hired Palin to succeed her as CEO of HP, Fiorina said the point is that Palin’s executive experience trumps Obama’s. "The size of the company, just like the size of the state, is less important than … Sarah Palin has made executive decisions. Barrack Obama has not."

Former Republican Massachusetts Gov. Jane Swift said the women were not asking for Palin to get votes just because she is a woman.

"I don’t think anybody is saying you should vote for her because of this," Swift said, adding, "but the good people of America won’t stand for the sexism that is being applied to Gov. Palin."

Swift invoked the failed vice presidential bid of Geraldine Ferarro in 1984, saying, with a little help from a staffer on the math, that it has been "24 years since we’ve had a woman run … and if more women had stood up 24 years ago … there might have been more women running in the interim."

She noted, in Palin’s speech before the Republican National Convention tonight, Americans will see a woman who is "just doing her job."

Fiorina was pushed on the Clinton question later, after again accusing Democrats of being sexist toward the New York senator. A reporter asked if Clinton had ever suffered sexism from Republicans.

"No, I think the Republican Party took her on her stand on issues," Fiorina said. "Took her on hard on her stand on issues. I have differences with her stands, but I have great respect for Hillary Clinton. All women owe a debt of gratitude to Hillary Clinton."

Swift said she was speaking as a working mother "who sent her daughters off to the Massachusetts public schools for the first day this morning."

Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn said there is a special expertise that working mothers gain in their experience as a "PTA chair or a girl scout cookie mom."

Blackburn said it is unfair "the way the media continues to attack conservative women to demean their record."

User Comments

How sick is it that the mainstream media have told us more about Bristol Palin’s out-of-wedlock baby in the past 5 days than they have told us about John Edwards’ out-of-wedlock baby for more than a year!

Posted by: Elizabeth Springer | September 3, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Women will decide this election.

Posted by: tina | September 3, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

ARE YOU KIDDING ME! PLEASE STOP WITH THE B.S. IF THIS WOMAN IS GOING TO BE MY VICE PRESIDENT THEN SHE NEEDS TO GO THROUGH THE SAME SCRUTINY THAT EVERYONE WHO RUNS FOR PUBLIC OFFICE GOES THROUGH. IF SHE CANT HANDLE THE MEDIA ASKING QUESTIONS, MAYBE SHE IS NOT TOUGH ENOUGH TO BE VICE PRESIDENT. SO ENOUGH WITH THE SEXIST TALK. THIS IS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF THE MCCAIN CAMPAIGN TRYING TO GET HILLARY’S SUPPORTERS TO VOTE FOR HIM.

Posted by: lovy | September 3, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm

Sarah Palin is a great choice…..
I’m a man and i support Palin for the
job……Let’s have a qualify female
for VP in our nation…..
Palin has a great personality and
she’s ready to take on corruption…
McCAIN/PALIN ’08

Posted by: NICHOLAS | September 3, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Let me get this straight……..
Days of talk about the VP pick’s daughter……but a cover up for a potential Presidential nominee’s love child.
Nice and object, right?
The media is a total disgrace. If this were Obama’s daughter, we’d all be accused of being racist for even talking about it.

Posted by: JA | September 3, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

I am a well educated woman in a high power job who happens to be a mother. The women who are calling the Obama camapign and supporters sexist are wrong and frankly they are hurting women by crying “sexism”. If the McCain campaign wants to use Palin’s “Hockey Mom” image as a way to sell her then they have opened the door to any question about her as a woman/mother.

Posted by: Maura | September 3, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Lovy,
Then please let’s scrutinize PALIN herself, not her children.
Or better yet, let’s scrutinize Obama’s relation to Ayers. Why isn’t the media reporting on that? It’s far more relevant to an election.

Posted by: JA | September 3, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Lets really look at the experience comparison:
Obama:
B.A in political science from Columbia University, with a specialization in international relations
J.D. in Law from Hardvard, graduated magna cum laude; President of the Harvard Law Review
12 years (92-04) teaching constitutional law
7 years State Senator: sponsored more than 800 bills
4 years Senator for Illinos, a state with 12.8 million people
Palin:
Bachelor’s in journalism from University of Idaho
4 years Wasilla City Council (8000 people)
6 years Wasilla mayor (8000 people)
1 year “Ethics Commissioner of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission”
20 months governor of a state with 660,000 people
Do the Republicans really think we’re so stupid that we would believe she is more experienced than Obama? Give me a break…

Posted by: JustMyObservation | September 3, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

Yes, the “liberal media” is at it again.They tried to trash Hillary while worshipping at the shrine of Obama. Now here’s another woman for them to slam.I’m a Democrat and a Hillary supporter. The Democrat party may reap a bitter harvest in November for under-estimating the memory and voting power of Clinton supporters. Many extreme left Obama voters kept smirking and saying, “we don’t need you”. Well good! See how it goes without us!

Posted by: WomanPower88 | September 3, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

“Asked later why it was sexist to question her political affiliations…”
So, why is it racist to question Obama’s history of being a Muslim, especially when it clearly states on his Indonesian school registration that he was? How come the MSM has not addressed that issue, which is MUCH more relevant to the safety of this country, but instead has attacked Palin like hyenas?
And that clear unbalanced reporting, is sexism.
They question the experience of a woman, but let the more inexperience male get off scot-free.
A weak man is threatened by a strong woman.

Posted by: liberati | September 3, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

I truely like Palin, don’t see anything wrong with having a 17 year old girl having a baby or got prenant. In this country or around the world, there a many high girls under 18 doing that before that got married. Palin’s daughter is just one of the victim. However, We should praise her for stood up and took the resposibility to keep the bady. The one who is complainning, may her some relative or their own children doing the same thing, but luckly public may not know about. Those people should be shame themselve.

Posted by: Lynn Hennessy | September 3, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Last time I checked John Edwards was not on any presidential ticket. Palin brought this all on herself. Stop making excuses for her. She could have said no.

Posted by: Mike M. | September 3, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Half of Obama’s time in Senate he has dedicated to running for President. And half the time he actually was showing up to Senate he voted “present”. It’s not just time, but HOW YOU MAKE USE OF THAT TIME.
As far as academic credentials, that is a worthless guide to how effective you can be as a president. I know people in the Ivory Tower seem to think that academic success translates into real world success, but it really doesn’t. Our best presidents weren’t that educated.

Posted by: JA | September 3, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

elizabeth…..i am a lifelong Democrat, and even that appalls me….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

The things that people do to get you to lose sight of whats important and thats the real issues of whats going on, now who got who pregnant and when, or cheated on who…If we did a poll and people were honest probably 85% of us have been cheated on lied to or cursed at. Who is the best canadate and why, why would Obama would smear her for being a women, when he is a minority
and why would McCain smear Obama when he has a women VP running mate, also in this arena considered a minority.

Posted by: Cicly | September 3, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Absolutely. John Edwards is given the royal, discrete treatment about his womanizing affair and possibly fathered a love child…. and the media treats him with kid gloves. The democrats hold Teddy Kennedy up as an icon, and the epitome of a politician? Do you know how many DWI’s he has had in his life? That in the late ’90s he was found having sex, half-naked in a restaurant? Much more if you choose to look at it. And here we have a courageous, hard-working Governor, with a fantastic public political record, and the media, and democrats, are bashing her family and questioning her morals? My goodness. I guess it’s politics, but I think people are smarter than to fall for this over time. Give her a chance, and then vote your conscience.

Posted by: Mike | September 3, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

what the ignorant lemmings fail to recognize is that obama himself was not subject to such intense scrutiny and hatred as palin is, and she’s only the vp candidate!

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

justmyobservation: as usual, you spin Obama’s thin resume and you omit important aspects of Palin’s. Obama’s time in the US senate is minimal at best given that he started running for President from the beginning.
Palin administers and manages the state’s 11 billion dollar budget. Obama: zilcho state budget management.
Palin has negotiated a pipeline with Canada, which has brought more energy needs to the US than Biden has done for energy in his entire career.
Obama: zilcho in the foreign negotiaton dept.
Palin has commandered the National Guard, which has been deployed into action. A branch of this is also responsible for the ballistic defense system, which is unique to Alaska, and therefore Alaska’s NG is the only one under 24 hour guard.
Obama: no experience with security issues.
STOP bringing up silly issues like harvard grad (Bush went to Yale, you know, are you going to say now that he was “experienced”?), and state senate….that means he was just a state legislator. And no, he didn’t “sponsor” 800 bills, he co-sponsored the large majority of those, which is what every other senator does.
In his time in the us senate, according to seante records, he only authored TWO bills that went into law: naming a post office, and supporting democracy in the Congo.
the fact that you are lying to buff up his resume, and lying to demean Palin’s, shows more desperation as an Obama supporter than you will ever know.
Seek the truth.
McCain/Palin 2008

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 3, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Isn’t it obvious?!
You can be a black man and have zero accomplishments in anything, you are still a God, a God of Nothingness. If you are a woman, they worry about who takes care of the baby.

Posted by: d0 | September 3, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

JA…you might want to check your facts. Obama’s “Present” votes are common procedure in the Illinois Senate and stand for a “NO” vote under special circumstances. Please go to the Library of Congress website to compare Obama’s and McCain’s voting records. You will note that since the Presidential campaign started Obama has voted almost 30% more than McCain. McCain is a much bigger no show.

Posted by: Mike M. | September 3, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

if it wasn’t inevitable before, it is now: obama will lose in November, thanks to his horrendous judgment and hypocrisy and the ignorance, arrogance, naivete, sexism and racism of many of his supporters….”Change” is not about switching out one arrogant leader for another….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

I guess now they will have to include PEGGY NOOMAN to the list of those sexists.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Noonan_Murphy_trash_Palin_on_hot_mic_Its_over.html
Oh, I guess Mike Murphy, the former McCain adviser, as well.
Hypocrisy at it best.

Posted by: Lance D. | September 3, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

mike M. – “since the Presidential campaign”……i guess that means obama is qualified then….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

lance….actually, hypocrisy at its best is barack obama….why is he the best? because he has the millions of you fools fooled….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Luvguv….and you would agree then:
Why won’t Obama release:
– his real paper birth certificate? Sure he has a birth certificate? And not a copy, but the real one?
– His Illinois state senate records?
– His full medical records?
– Why was access to the Annenberg Challenge records initally blocked?
What is he hiding? And aren’t these MUCH more relevant to our country’s safety than Palin’s birthing records? Have you all gone insane?

Posted by: liberati | September 3, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Fiorina lies all the time about Obama and McCain’s tax plan.
From the POW card to the sexist card. The McCain campaign issued a press release about Bristol being pregnant, which put it open to discussion. Bristol should not be discussed, but Gov Palin’s non-support for birth control and for taking support for pregnant teenagers out of the Alaska budget is open to discussion.
One reason pro-choice people are discussing the issue is because the holier than anyone else attitude of many Republicans.
Unmarried teenagers has been a problem for centuries. To bury their head in the sand and say only teach abstinence does not help reduce abortions.
Discussions about whether a woman with children should be VP/President is somewhat sexists. Being a VP/President is not a part-time job. I do think Mr Palin should become a full time dad because one of the parents need to be there for the children. I stayed home with my children when they were young by living a very meager life style. I cannot imagine having someone else being the primary care taker for my children. The children might forget who their mother is.
Michelle Obama is on a leave of absence from her job.

Posted by: Julie | September 3, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

Weeks ago, I thought this election would be generational…..I now know that it will be male/female, and 54% of female population might very well make this a McCAIN/PALIN WIN!!!!!
HILLARY SUPPORTER FOR John Sydney and Never Barack Hussein….Gov. Palin a great choice.

Posted by: Debra | September 3, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

why did obama subject his daughters to the hateful rants of their pastor, even if they didn’t occur everyday?

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

Gimme a break. Anytime anyone asks anything about Palin that is not cleared by the Republican Party (Rove) will be labeled as sexist. And that “liberal” media is owned by people like Rupert Murdock, about a conservative a scoundrel as has ever lived.

Posted by: algwriter | September 3, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Mike M. — you are grossly incorrect. Voting “present” is done, but it was unprecedented that Obama voted so many times, much more so than any of his other colleagues. He was criticized for it by his hometown newspaper, as well as his democratic opponents, including Clinton and Edwards in one debate. Obama had no reasonable defense for it whatsoever. It simply means that this is a man who refuses to commit and make a decision, in fear of offending one party or another.
Can you imagine Obama with his finger on the red button? Scary.

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 3, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

if the mccain camp thinks democrates will vote for him with this bs—-he has another thought coming—-women that supported hillary –REALLY ARE NOT THAT DUMB AND STUPID—wonder if his buddy rove thought this one up.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

is that the same michelle obama who essentially implied that Senator Clinton was unfit to be President because Bill had extra-marital sex?

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

What about former McCain VP candidates Portman and Meg Whitman?
Today, they both said there has not been sexism in the media coverage.
Portman even praised Obama and Biden for saying children are off limits in politics.

Posted by: Dan | September 3, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

For over a year there’s been a steady stream of lies and distortions spread about both Obama and Clinton. Then the neo-cons screamed “why aren’t questions being asked” now the media looks at an unqualified, extremist candidate and the neo-con’s scream “sexism”. Pack of hypocrites, one and all.

Posted by: JA | September 3, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

Hockey moms,all of you pregnant at 16 or 17, kids on the internet meeting who knows what, pierced to the hilt! Think Palin with a disabled child and one pregnant is running to be VP with out taking care of her brood. Look at the pictures of Bristol with the balnket trying to conceal her stomach, she carried that baby all day, and 5 months pregant! SHAME ON PALIN! This will stop the talk that only minorities get knocked up without marrage, and with out a HS diploma. The Palins are white TRASH! This chicken came home BIG TIME! Center stage!

Posted by: lions2tigers | September 3, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

JustMyObservation, are you not familiar with our three branches of government? No “experience” you listed for Obama counts as an EXECUTIVE BRANCH qualification. Let me repeat, since the Obamabots are especially slow today, Palin has more EXECUTIVE DECISION-MAKING experience at the bottom of the Republican ticket than Obama does at the top. Period. It’s simply not debatable. Obama’s educational “experience” does not trump Palin’s. Many Washington politicians were educated at elite schools and look at the mess their “enlightened” educations have created for the rest of us. Obama is just more of the same. I know many brilliant business leaders who were educated at public universities and they can run circles around Obama. One of the wealthiest executives on the planet, Bill Gates, was a college dropout for crying out loud and look at the magnitude of his contributions to society.

Posted by: Jim in OH | September 3, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

“Sexism sexism (Palin) sexism”
Ha ha ha!
As McCaint’s Republi-con adviser, Phil Gram, might say, “McCaint campaign is a campaign of WHINERS!” lol
Bush IS National Disaster Personified.
Name ONE thing constructive the wild bush has created in 8 years of Presidency?
And McCaint is 90% National Disaster Bush!

Posted by: Patriot | September 3, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

liberati
i have a question for you——-WHY ARE MCCAINS MILITARY RECORDS SEALED—-DO YOU THINK MAYBE HE HAS SOMETHING TO HIDE——

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Hillary has been given scrutinized for everything she has done by the right wing. Well, Sarah Palin, if you can’t stand the heat, then GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN! This just goes to show once again that Palin is no Hillary Clinton.

Posted by: NoToGrandpaMunster | September 3, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

obama was against off-shore drilling before he was for it; he was against NAFTA, then he was for it; he was committed to pull all troops out in 16 months before he uncommitted; he needed his church in illinois for his political career until 20 years later, when he needed to leave it for his political career; he was against FISA before he voted for it;……i guess obama has to be a great speaker…. you can’t support him based on his positions on the issues because you’re not sure what they might be tomorrow…..

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Last night – History Channel pt 1 (1776-1968)
Tonight – History Channel pt 2 Womens rights and women in politics 1900-present
Tomorrow – History Channel pt 3 – POW Camp
but still still no information of what the GOP will do for America

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Palin left the town of Wasilla $20 million in debt. When she became mayor there was no deficit.
Palin may be the symbolic head of the Alaskan National Guard but the actual commander spoke out yesterday saying the Palin has no involvement whatsoever.
Palin was for the “bridge to nowhere” and also managed to lobby for $27 million in earmarks for Wasilla after hiring Ted Stevens’ ex-chief of staff as a lobbyist. So she is no reformer or fiscal conservative.
She tried to fire the Wasilla town librarian because she wouldn’t ban books that Palin didn’t like. So she doesn’t understand the Constitution.

Posted by: Mike M. | September 3, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

obama is no Hillary Clinton, because only Hillary Clinton is capable of being the best President that our children, our troops and America needs right now….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

JIM
I DID NOT KNOW GATES IS A POLITITION.
THANKS—WHAT IS HE RUNNING FOR

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Obama running while raising two kids will not make news, but it would surely give everyone pause if Obama had five kids, one of whom a new-born baby with special needs and another preparing to be a teenage mother.
It wasn’t considered sexist when the McCain campaign pushed Palin’s image of a “hockey mom” — note: nobody has ever called Obama “a basketball pop” — but it is sexist to put her hockey mom image under the microscope. How strange!
I agree wholeheartedly that we should spare the kids. But it’s entirely reasonable for every voter to ask this question: can a candidate handle the VP (which could turn into the top job) job while taking care of such a big family with so many special needs?
I just hope that McCain/Palin will answer all legitimate questions and stop flashing the gender card and the POW card.
Palin should certainly step up and tell her own campaign to stop its collective whining.

Posted by: Chris | September 3, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

The only thing sexist lately has been John McCain’s voting record on issues like Equal Pay and Abortion. Republican’s can’t cry sexism when they’ve made a living out of it.

Posted by: Anthony | September 3, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Sexism? Like Obama hasn’t had to deal with racism?
As Sarah Palin herself said about Hillary, stop the WHINING. Do the Republicans think she looks like a strong VP candidate by complaining she is the victim of sexism because of a perfectly natural media interest in an unknown surprise candidate?
This is the real world– GROW A SET!!

Posted by: mila | September 3, 2008, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

obama ignored his constituents when they suffered in sub-standard housing owned by his friend/donor rezko during a chicago winter….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

The only sexist thing that has happend is John McCain staring at her butt when she was speaking in Dayton. He stared at her butt at least 10 times.

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

CHRIS
YOU HAVE FORGOTTEN WE HAVE BUSH—AND JUST MAYBE MCBUSH—EXCITING ISNT IT.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

rodney, you missed my point. Bill Gates is a CEO. Palin is also a CEO, of a state. The responsibilities have many similarities.

Posted by: Jim in OH | September 3, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

WOW!! THE SEXIST CARD IS OUT IN FULL FORCE..ND NOW IS USE BY THE MCCAIN CAMP , HOW LOW AND PATHETIC.
CHARGING THE MEDIA BECAUSE THEY ACTUALLY ARE DOING THEIR JOBS.
SORRY WE NOT BUYING WHAT YOU TRYING TO STIR UP HERE.
YOUR GIMMICK PICK OF A CANDIDATE HAVE ISSUES AND QUESTIONS AND NOW YOU TRYING TO PLAY THE SEX CARD.
NOT COOL.

Posted by: christine | September 3, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

even Senator Clinton’s supporters had to endure racism….from obama’s supporters! http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8762.html

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

decentAmerican- McCain caved to the right wing of the Republican Party after learning from his aides and Karl Rove less than a week ago that a floor fight would erupt at the covention if he chose Lieberman as his running mate, his # 1 choice. Instead, he pandered to the right and “hoped” to pick up women voters who backed Clinton in the primaries even though Hillary’s views on the key issues are diametrically opposite of Palin’s. It is a transparent, desperate, last minute move by a man who should have had the courage to pick the right person for the job, particularly given the fact that he is a 72 year old 3 time cancer survivor. Your statement that Palin has “commandered” the National Guard is priceless. Do you also support Cindy McCain’s comment that Palin has experience in international issues because Alaska is near Russia?? They can spin it any way you want, but the majority of Americans are smart enough to see pandering at its finest by the GOP. Get real.

Posted by: ram | September 3, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

OMENTUM——-THIS ONE WILL BLOW UP IN MCCAINS FACE—SHOULD BE INTERESTING.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

McBush can Rant and Rave all he
wants.. it will not change the History
of his Actions……. and the choices
he has made… is this a preview
of what it would be like to have him
as President of the United States?
Nightmare on Elm Streets….

Posted by: Anita Yova | September 3, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

their behavior, arrogance and ignorance suggest that obama and his lemmings would be “more of the same” much more than mccain would be…..

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Just to get the facts straight. John Edwards had a sexual affair. He didn’t father a child out of wedlock.
Stop lying people, and get your facts straight before making yourselves look like asses.

Posted by: AnnapolisMD | September 3, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

HEY RAM
YOU HAVE TO ADMIT THEY GIVE NEW MEANING TO THE WORD—-DUMB DUMB

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

if obama can’t even take the time and energy to even attempt to help his own family (half-brother), how can we trust him to help others when it is not in his political best interest?

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

i can’t imagine how full the schedules of psychotherapists will be after obama’s inevitable failure on November 4th….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

rodney
he lit the fuse when he picked palin
this is quite amusing seeing the gop spinning themselves dizzy on trying to cover for the bad choices of ‘THE MAVERICK’
where’s my popcorn.

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

I say vote Hillary. Obama sucks and McCain sucks. Hillary is still our best choice.

Posted by: j | September 3, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Askig her back ground is not sexism get a clear mind first if you want to sink with her in quick sand that is your choice but we are not going to let our country sink with these two candidats one self centerd selfish who cares about his election and she is lier and hypocrat..

Posted by: JOJO | September 3, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

CHRIS
YOU HAVE TO ADMIT THE REPUBS HAVE OUR INTEREST IN MIND—LIKE CHINA GETTING THE OIL BENIFITS FROM IRAQ—

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

luvguv…..OMG IT’S…A…BABY..AN INNOCENT CHILD…ARE YOU LIBS SO SICK THAT YOU ARE NOW SETTING YOUR TARGETS ON AN INNOCENT CHILD……..

Posted by: curiousindep | September 3, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

The democrats have taken women’s vote for granted for far too long. The democrats think they can bash and attack women when it serves to get Obama elected and women will still vote democrat when it’s November. I say hell no. I say vote McCain into office and show the democrats the REAL voting power of women. Women can put politicians in office and women can TAKE politicians out of office.

Posted by: jn | September 3, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

J —–YOU DID NOT INCLUDE PALIN—-WHY ?????????????

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

number of houses mccain own = don’t really know
palins experience = zero
bush’s approval = priceless
OBAMA BIDEN 08

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

given the level of their hatred and disgust and vitriol, it is easy to see that obama’s lemmings are too emotionally involved with him to realize only Senator Clinton is capable of being the best President for America right now….

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Where was their outrage and condemnation when conservative website spread racist smears against Obama? Forgive me if I don’t entirely sympathize with their righteousness.

Posted by: Nick B | September 3, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

How did you guys like the history channel last night.

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

OK PALIN—LIKE HILLARY SAID—IF YOU CANNOT STAND THE HEAT GET OUT OF THE KITCHEN–THIS IS HARDBALL POLITICS.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

Hey…..we’ve had white trash in the WH for the last 16 years, why not try out some trailer trash? It ain’t about Bristol Palin; it’s about a mother who raises her kids this way. Trailer trash, baby, trailer trash.

Posted by: Cyrus Clarke | September 3, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

“Liberal websites are accusing Palin with faking a pregnancy… being a nazi sympathizer…associating with fringe groups……and supermarket tabloids shout about babies, lies and scandal.”
WHAT!
Republicans complaining about propaganda being spread on the internet??
NOW THATS FUNNY!!
The Republican Party are the masters of spreading propaganda to smear opponents.
Now that want to cry about it?
WHAAAA WHAAA!! I don’t feel the least bit sorry for the Republicans. They are getting what they deserve:
Removal from power.

Posted by: Daniel | September 3, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

the rebublicans have the dumbed down electorate fooled by playing the sexism card for every question about Palen

Posted by: divide&conquer | September 3, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

through all this time, all these many months, through the primaries and now through the conventions, 95% of the arguments made by obama’s lemmings for his candidacy are littered with attacks, ignorance, arrogance, naivete, racism and sexism against his opponents, leaving very, very few arguments of hope, unity and all the values that obama supposedly stands for and promotes……is this the “CHANGE” that obama will bring to America?

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

OMENTUM
I MISSED IT——-BUT WOULD PAY TO SEE MCCAINS MILITARY RECORDS UNEDITED—I KNOW WHY AND SO DO A LOT OF OTHERS—THE OLD FOOL THINKS ALL HAVE FORGOT.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Wait a minute here! Didn’t Palin call Hillary a whiner for saying that the media treated her with sexism – isn’t she playing the same card now. Just another example of flip flopping by the GOP people – when it happens to somebody else they are whinning, but when it happens to me it sexism. Thank you for showing the American people exactly how you think and act – can’t hide behind the lie when you said it yourself – whiner!

Posted by: jozy | September 3, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

So let me understand this. Liberal feminists, who made large gains over the past few decades, are criticizing Palin because she “needs to stay at home to attend to her family.” And conservative feminists are ecstatic to support a fellow feminist, who is able to juggle a successful career and family life. This is like the Twilight Zone. Liberals are self-destructing inside the space of a week.

Posted by: Jim in OH | September 3, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

McCain/Palin has been releasing ALL this stuff to the media–now you blame the media for passing it on. Are you guys dumb and blind, too?
This is a masterful Rovian manipulation. Unfortunately aimed at the MTV generation. Just what we need to drive out young people’s morals further into dogville.
Go GOP–you’re on your way to completely trashing this country. A bankruptcy in every house and a bun in every teenage oven!

Posted by: AQ2 | September 3, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

even those very, very few messages and posts actually arguing FOR obama talk in abstract terms right out of his shallow, but pretty, speeches…..any questions about his plans or policies and you are immediately insulted and told to look them up on his website, because it is apparent that the lemming does not themselves know what he plans on doing if he wins……very sad and very scary. Obama Lemmings = uninformed hatred

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Chris says – why did obama subject his daughters to the hateful rants of their pastor, even if they didn’t occur everyday?
_____________________________________________________
Why did Palin? Why did she sit in the pews of her church listening to garbage about the Jews bringing on all the terror on themselves because they are not saved…..

Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

the obama lemmings are pure hypocrites, much like their messiah…..palin and her supporters cannot whine about sexism, but if you dare to support anyone other than obama, you must be a racist…..

Posted by: chris | September 3, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

Annapolis MD:
And you know for a FACT that John Edwards did not father a love child?
Have you personally conducted the paternity test?

Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

If McCain wanted to put a woman on the ticket, why didn’t he put somebody like Kay Bailey Hutchison or Olympia Snowe? THAT is the thing that offends most women–he bypassed these great republican senators who are very capable of stepping in for him and instead went for Caribou Barbie. women would like to be rewarded for their hard work and their brains, not for how they look in a bikini.

Posted by: alison | September 3, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm

The “executive experience” argument doesn’t wash. If it were truly as important as the Republicans claim it is, McCain doesn’t qualify to be president.
I find the Republican’s hypocrisy to be truly astounding. They’re allowed to bash Obama all they want for his perceived lack of experience, but if anyone dares criticize Palin for the same reason, they’re sexist. They apparently believe the American people don’t have a right to examine the credentials of the person who will be a heartbeat away from the presidency. News flash, Repubs-WE DO!!!
And did you notice that Carly Fiorina never answered the question about whether she would have hired Palin to take her place at HP?

Posted by: Traci | September 3, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I SEE THE BUSH FREAK IS NOW GIVING A BILLION OF OUR MONEY IN GEORGIA—–AND WE STILL HAVE NO HEALTH CARE—–BUSH MCBUSH ONE AND THE SAME

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

Palin is a stupid idiot with no experience or brains that believe Global Warning isn’t real, that polar bears are no big deal and not endangered, that Medicare and social security checks should be stopped immediately and that George Bush is a hero. Screw her, her unwed pregnant teenager and the moose she rode in on.

Posted by: Democrats 08 | September 3, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

chris
Just stick to the facts….OK?
More Tax Deceptions
August 8, 2008
Updated: August 12, 2008
McCain misrepresents Obama’s tax proposals again. And again, and again.
Summary
http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/more_tax_deceptions.html
McCain’s Small-Business Bunk
He claims 23 million small-business owners would pay higher tax rates under Obama. He’s wrong. The vast majority would see no change, and many would get a cut.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/146210
The Financial Times
Obama holds bipartisan economy talks
Mr McCain’s tax and spending proposals would add an estimated $3,400bn to the US deficit over the next decade compared with an estimated $700bn deficit reduction from Mr Obama’s plans, according to the Tax Policy Center, an independent think-tank.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/e23cc97c-5cfa-11dd-8d38-000077b07658.html

Posted by: ApostasyUSA | September 3, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

ALLISON
SOMEONE SAID MCCAIN WAS LOOKING AT HER BUTT—THAT SHOULD ANSWER A LOT OF QUESTIONS.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Libs/Dems are just pissed that the first woman VP is going to be a strong, tough REPUBLICAN. It sickens them, as it should.
Slowly their arguments/reasons to vote for them wane.

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

For those of you new on this board, Debra is one of the debunked PUMAs. Shine her on.

Posted by: Amie | September 3, 2008, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Apostasy,
that’s an Obama paid for website.
Nice try though. But you lose.

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Just a note – Unfair coverage.
A woman is scrutinized about everything in her life. Her husband had a drunk driving arrest 20 years ago. (OMG) Her Daughter is pregnant, she has 5 kids and no experience.
Yet I bet more than half of you do not know that Barack Obama admits to heavy drug use while in college getting those precious degrees. Not just the pot and I did not inhale part like Clinton. Cocaine use and heavy Marijane use.
http://www.russpage.net/barack-obama-cocaine-use-and-60-minutes/
Their excuse for not putting it out there is mundane at best. I seem to remember this being a big deal with Democrats when they accused President Bush of being a coke head with unfounded evidence and were toting “the unfit to be president because of alcohol use and drug use.”
But now the big issue is that the VP candidate has a daughter pregnant and how can she be VP with kids. This disqualifies her as a candidate and you are upset because of they use Sexism when it clearly is. I mean does it matter that Barack has 2 daughters and he is not spending enough time around them.
Wonderful Biden Served while being an only parent and was able to do it. Is it because he was a man. He also has made remarks about how “Pretty” Governor Palin is and not capable or not capable to be VP. To me that is sexist, what does her being pretty have to do with her capability as a VP candidate. “I know that she is prettier than me” Biden Said when asked about Palin.
To the point now… It is sickening how the coverage is different for her. How she has been routinely attacked and the ones who are supposed to be enlightened can not even see the sexism that exist in their own party. Oh well it is said you can only lead sheep and not teach them lessons.

Posted by: ron | September 3, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Why won’t Palin release her medical records or the baby’s birth certificate? What is she hiding?
Surely the baby has a birth certificate!
Posted by: LuvGuv |
==============================
You should be but will not bring the same question why Ubama the illegal alien does not produce his.
Your all a joke and why this country is headed to a revolt.
Blacks, women and gays will not decide the election, it will be the 40 million mexicans ( most are illegal) who have been on the sidelines laughing as they intend to vote as many illegal times as they can get away with to decide who takes over the whitehouse and while the women on here have to tell us they have high powered jobs they have allowed mexicans to out breed them by a 10 to 1 ratio due to women who want to wear men’s suits, ties and panties who cannot boil water.

Posted by: 99vette | September 3, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Alison:
Unfortunately, both of the well-respected female Senators you named are pro-choice.
If he was going to take that route, he would have picked Lieberman or Ridge.

Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Liberal = Sexist
Obama calls women “sweetie”
The DNC backstabs Hillary
CNN attacks a 17 year old girl
NYTimes questions Palin being a mother
Hip hop sexists endorse Obama
etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc,

Posted by: julie | September 3, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Okay……..so when the Dems didn’t agree on invading Iraq, they {GOP}called us “unpatriotic”. Now when we question their VP candidates qualifications they call us “sexist”……..nuff said.
I’m an Alaskan, and Sarah is barely pulling off the Gov job. Don’t let her screw up the rest of the country too.

Posted by: Steve | September 3, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

lovy wrote: “IF THIS WOMAN IS GOING TO BE MY VICE PRESIDENT THEN SHE NEEDS TO GO THROUGH THE SAME SCRUTINY THAT EVERYONE WHO RUNS FOR PUBLIC OFFICE GOES THROUGH”
…. which is why no one reported on Obama’s foul-mouthed pastor until they were forced into it right? But going to an anti-white, anti-American church for 20+ years is less important than a 17 year old being pregnant?
…. give us a break …you obamacons hate Hillary Clinton .. and you hate family values!!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | September 3, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

One by one the media and Obama team turn away women voters.

Posted by: Beth | September 3, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

We keep hearing how Palin has executive experience thus making her “more qualified” than Obama. However, Bush had excutive experience as well and look at the mess he has made.
Some experience does matter to me, but the type is less important. The president has countless advisors on staff that he can seek information and recommendations if necessary.
I want a president with the sound judgement to seek out information from all sources available and use that information to make a smart decision. I feel that Barack Obama is exactly the contemplative figure that could bring back intelligence to an office where it has been absent for so long.
Obama/Biden ’08

Posted by: KellyinOregon | September 3, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Hey Chris -
The only lemming here is YOU! In our history, 12 previuos presidents had the same if not less time in public office as Obama, and guess what – they were the ones that saved America from the depression, and inspired new hope and programs to help those who needed help – unlike your ticket of POW/Hockey Mom, who side with numnuts 90% of the time – which is by the way how we got where we are today, spending 10 billion in Iraq, fighting a war we shouldn’t be fighting. Cuts GOP programs that favor the wealthy, tax the rich and give breaks to the 150 million working men and women of the middle class – if that isn’t a plan then I don’t know that McSame was a POW (which by the way is his reply to every question he doesn’t want to answer)

Posted by: jozy | September 3, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

The networks are preparing for RECORD audience viewing tonight!
Just what Obama team didn’t need.
Whoooo hoooo!

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Jozy, that would all be fine and good, but first of all those people didn’t come from the CORRUPT political machine in Chicago ….AND
none of Obama’s rhetoric matches his words, votes or ACTIONS (see Rev. Wright & Bill Ayers)….
Nice try but you lose again.

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

Palin accused Hilary Clinton of ‘whining’!
And McCaint campaign accused the American people of being a nation of ‘whiners’!
Now the McCaint campaign is ‘whining’ on Pollen’s behalf?
Talk about having it both ways! lol

Posted by: Patriot | September 3, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Jo
WHAT SITE?
Which one?
This one:
Noonan, Murphy trash Palin on hot mic: ‘It’s over’
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0908/Noonan_Murphy_trash_Palin_on_hot_mic_Its_over.html

Posted by: ApostasyUSA | September 3, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Most of the “sexism” comments McCain’s camp is calling people out for are coming from their own far, right wing base. The base of evangelicals that believes a woman’s place is in the home. Dr. Laura even Blogged about it today. I think they need to look in the mirror before crying foul.
http://www.drlaurablog.com/2008/09/02/sarah-palin-and-motherhood/

Posted by: NMP | September 3, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

As someone with an interest in Alaska the weekend events were pretty fascinating to me and I decided to start a website dedicated to sorting out fact from fiction in regards to Sarah Palin. There’s also the problem of myself and a girl I have now been unable to contact for five days who have been on the receiving end of death threats, rape threats and all sorts of criminal activity because of a Santa Barbara based career criminal drug dealer who is also a violent sociopath. Police are on the case but I want to get the story out as much as possible in addition to that.
You can find the website here:
http://www.sarahpalinrumorcheck.blogspot.com

Posted by: Rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Can you just imagine how many favors that Obama owes the sleazy corrupt democrat political machine in Chicago?
It makes one shudder.

Posted by: Jo | September 3, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

I THINK JO IS IN LOVE WITH REV WRIGHT–CANT GET HIM OUT OF MIND.—VERY STRANGE

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Jo:
Yes, and hopefully during this RECORD viewing audience, the major networks will not cut off or cut into the speeches tonight like they so rudely did last night.
Like I keep saying, if McCain didn’t exactly plan this to happen this way, he is certainly reaping the public relation/exposure benefits of having selected Palin.

Posted by: SandyB | September 3, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

HI RODNEY
WHERE DID YOU COME FROM–????????????

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Traci, historically, governors are much more compatible with the offices of President and VP. Senators are generally not as well suited, unless they have non-Washington executive experience. JFK had lots of problems getting policies implemented because he was a senator before he was President. McCain was not my first pick because of this issue. But we have what we have. Interestingly, liberals didn’t seem to have a problem with Bill Clinton’s experience as a governor before he was elected. Palin has achieved more dramatic accomplishments both fiscally and to fight corruption in Alaska than Clinton ever did. But that doesn’t qualify her as a VP? Are you kidding me?

Posted by: Jim in OH | September 3, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Alison: It’s easy to see why he picked Palin. He knew the media would go crazy trying to vett her and then he could yell “sexism” When is the last time anyone talked about the issues? If she leaves the ticket then they can blame the liberals and Obama and get the sympathy vote.Are Americans going to fall for it? OMG I hope not.

Posted by: linda n carolina | September 3, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

DID SOMEONE SAY PALIN IS 20 MILLION IN DEBT—–WHAT KIND OF INCOME DOES SHE HAVE TO GET THAT KIND OF CREDIT—THIS IS GETTING INTERESTING

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

The media is a total disgrace. If this were Obama’s daughter, we’d all be accused of being racist for even talking about it.
Posted by: JA | Sep 3, 2008 5:40:02 PM
Please. How do you think the public feels about unwed Black teenage mothers? If this was Obama’s daughter, he’d be completely ripped apart by the conservative establishment and would stand absolutely ZERO chance of winning in November.

Posted by: Jonathan | September 3, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

LINDA
MCCAIN THINKS THAT ALL WOMEN ARE STUPIN—HE WILL LEARN SOMETHING ON THIS ONE.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Okay – match up McSame to Delay – Hasters, wide stance Craig – GOP’ers are innocent?
none of Obama’s rhetoric matches his words, votes or ACTIONS (see Rev. Wright & Bill Ayers)….
Come on – I mean Obama was 6 when Ayers did his thing and was never found guilty so exactly what is your proof of his wrong doing – I knew a lot of people in the 60′s pissed off at the government – so what.
Rev Wright – has every reason to be angry – but they are just words – can I listen – or better yet did you listen or read the entire service – or just catch the sound bites?
but yet – the previous presidents who did make a difference were from the corrupt families in Mass, (ie Kenndy’s who made their family fortune running blootlegs op’s)just to name one -
a leaders vision is what make a great leader – just ask any CEO of any corporation or the military – and what they don’t know personally they put people around them that do – MLK had just words but look what he did. Some of his speechs would be worse than waht Wright said on any given day
so you lose!

Posted by: jozy | September 3, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

An Jo -
Its good to have amindless BOT stirring the pot !

Posted by: jozy | September 3, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

NOT TO CHANGE SUBJECT—–BUT DO YOU KNOW THAT OUR SONS AND DAUGHTERS HAVE DIED IN IRAQ AND CHINA IS REAPING THE OIL BENIFITS——WHO HAS A PROBLEM WITH THAT AND ADD ON THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS THAT WE COULD USE.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

My objections to Sarah Palin have nothing to do with gender. I have long understood that women are as well suited to politics as a man.
My issues have more to do with her intentions and her aspirations. After reading of her management style, her penchant for putting loyalty to her above all else, her blatant opportunism, and her tendency to take credit after others have done the heavy lifting, I cannot consider her to have any aptitude for the vice presidency.
My apologies to those of you who strive to characterize legitimate criticism as sexism, but while there are many women who would be qualified to be president, there are tens of thousands who are not. Sarah Louise Palin is one of them.

Posted by: Jerry | September 3, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

PALIN—A GOVERNER WHO MAY BE IMPEACHED –NOW ON THE REPUB TICKET AS VP,…..WOW THAT IS WHAT I CALL GOOD JUDGEMENT—MCCAIN STYLE—DUMB

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

SEXISM—SEXISM—–PALIN MAY GIVE IT NEW MEANING TILL THIS IS DONE—LOTS OF SKELATONS IN HER CLOSET—-SHOULD BE INTERESTING..

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

the republicans should consider superdelegates for situations like this

Posted by: Omentum | September 3, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

The ignorance Americans display regarding our tax system is breathtaking. The top 1% of income earners pay 40% of all taxes. Most of that wealth transfer covers taxes for the bottom 50% who pay about 3% of all taxes. Many taxpayers in the bottom 50% pay NO TAXES AT ALL but they receive significant tax credits (essentially welfare). So, it makes total sense that tax cuts go to the top tiers. They absolutely should. They pay most of the taxes and subsidize millions of other Americans. And, by the way, it’s the taxpayers at those top tiers that employ many of us through their small businesses. If you punish them, you punish yourself. If they have more capital available via lower taxes, they invest in their businesses and hire more workers. So please dispense with the class warfare and educate yourself before you support policies like Obama’s that can potentially put you on the street.
http://www.house.gov/jec/news/2008/July/pr110-45.pdf

Posted by: Jim in OH | September 3, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

JIM
IF YOU MAKE OVER 250 THOUSAND THEM PAY A LITTLE MORE——HOPE YOU REALIZE THAT IS BASED ON INCOME.

Posted by: rodney | September 3, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Did you hear Peggy Noonan’s off camera remarks? Even though she is a real conservative she said that Palin is totally unqualified “cynical” and gimmicky. She says “it’s over” for the republicans. The truth hurts. She is an unmitigated disaster.

Posted by: jane olin | September 3, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Ram and other ignorant doubters: when I criticize Obama’s inexperience, I make sure to compare Palin’s experience. She also has increased the tax rebate for her citizens, and lowered their taxes…tangible results.
However, when you criticize Palin, you NEVER give any defense of Obama’s executive experience. We have this discussion again and again, and you can keep talking circles around it, but everyone knows you are avoiding the obviuos.
clearly, and succinctly, indicate OBAMA’S EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE. Harvard, editor, and state senator does not count as executive experience. No, no talk about Palin, or McCain, or Biden…..WHAT IS OBAMA’S EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE. ANSWER THE QUESTION.
just watch….you can’t.
LOL!

Posted by: decentAmerican | September 3, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

hahaha, at least when we call something sexist, it IS, unlike conservatives being called “racist” because they ask legitimate questions. There have been no scandalous, libelous, ridiculous attacks on Obama. Nope. Just observations as to his conduct and character, but when questioned, we are “racist”.
CLEARLY, the dems are being sexist and it doesn’t make any sense given their views on feminism.
It’s NOT over for the republicans. IF they lose, you can be GUARANTEED we win in 2010!!!!!!! Even you libs will be sick of the tax hikes.
Heck, you guys are already sick of Pelosi, if not, then where’s her 85% approval rating? I believe hers is in the single digits, no?

Posted by: obamamama | September 3, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

While Obama was a state senator his district lost 11% of their jobs in 8 years. The only legislation he wrote and got passed was for more hand-outs to irresponsible people. At least 80% of legislation that has his name on it was written by other senators before Emil Jones hijacked it for Obama. His former senate colleagues hate the guy. They were not out campaiging or supporting him in any way. He is a fake and a liar.

Posted by: Mary | September 3, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Of course the media has coddled Obama and thrown obstacles in the path of McCain and Palin. Just read the ongoing biased headlines and articles on CNN’s website … and the way CNN’s Jack Cafferty belittles Palin every chance he gets. CNN also moderates its blogs in favor of Obama, then closes comments after they load the posts with Obama bias. Also, slim balls like Daily KOS, Huffington, and US Weekly have shown gross bad judgement in their reporting. These irresponsible media sources have lost touch with objectivity, fair reporting, and responsible journalism.

Posted by: Gina | September 3, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Sexism? I now understand where Hillary and Geraldine are coming from. But for all the disgraceful comments in the blogs and media, there is one great equalizer. And that will come out in the voting booth.

Posted by: Lelieread | September 3, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

I agree with Gina. I’m a Blue State Dem and I am absolutely appalled by the treatment of Palin to the point where I might change…

Posted by: dede | September 3, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

If the media doesn’t care, the public won’t care. Bottom line Palin is a woman who is pro life, pro gun, and is against everything the liberal media (and their sycophants in the liberal left) personally despises. This should not be a shock that when faced with a woman who made her way on her own and did the job right (Palin) and a woman who took the name and credit for everything her husband did (who was a criminal, had people killed and tortured and hideously and pathologically abused women like Juanita Broaddrick) (Hilliary) that the liberal establishment chooses to destroy the woman who actually has a chance to be the most powerful woman in history just because she isn’t of their party or their (victim) pathology. It’s a disgrace but then again so is Hilliary and her whole sorrowful, pitful class of followers who wouldn’t know a strong woman was the type who doesn’t stay with a man who doesn’t respect her, cry when she thinks she’s gonna lose, or threatens anybody and everybody who has the fortitude to stand up to her and tell her when she’s full of CRAP! You can have Hillary/Biden/Obama/ AND McCain, I’ll take Palin and a guy or gal off the street ANY day of the week!

Posted by: argh! | September 3, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Hi:
I honestly think that the private life should be kept private. It is nobody’s business. It is degrading for the media and everyone else to talk about such issues.
I do not appreciate Palin’s policies but I applaud for her courage and determination. I respectfully disagree with the gentleman who had summarized the short CV of Palin and Obama. Obama’s CV is very thin too … At least Palin was in charge of 10 billion dollar budget!
Though I think that if I were to vote, I would vote for Nader :).

Posted by: Meg | September 3, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

CNN’s Jack Cafferty, a bona-fide Obama sycophant and news hack, recently suggested that McCain “should consider replacing Palin.” This after making his case that she’s a “weak” candidate.
Let’s think about this for a moment.
Why would an Obama supporter insist that an “unqualified” VP candidate on the opposing ticket withdraw? Wouldn’t a weak candidate IMPROVE Obama’s election chances?
It’s rather obvious that Cafferty is absolutely terrified of the game-changing nature Palin’s introduction has had on the race and the damage she’ll do to Obama. Liberals are literally wetting their pants on live TV. The shrillness is through the roof. Hysterical. This irrational behavior, more than anything else, tells me that McCain’s pick was an absolutely BRILLIANT strategy. And I truly believe he knew this would occur. I have my differences with McCain, but the man is a genius.

Posted by: Jim in OH | September 3, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Sarah Palin is a lapsed Catholic who joined a holy roller yahoo fundamentalist church. Living here in the south, I’ve seen tons of them like her. For some reason, they grow starry eyed with scary psuedo-religious fervor. Sarah Palin has been quoted as saying her son is in Iraq “doing God’s work.” I guess The Big Guy spoke to her personally and gave her that assurance. John McCain’s campaign is about to get shot down like his plane over Hanoi. Oh, yeah. I’m a veteran who’s friends with a guy McCain used to fly with. He’s a die hard Republican who says he won’t vote for McCain because he’s not fit to be president and that a lot of people who served with McCain share that opinion. He also told me that he got a letter several months ago from McCain’s people warning any former military people who served with McCain to keep their mouths shut if they had anything bad to say. John McCain cut off his manhood and handed them to Karl Rove and that wack job Eskew who screwed him in South Carolina when McCain ran against Bush. McCain ain’t a maverick. He’s a damned gelding. Karl Rove has McCain’s balls on his keychain.

Posted by: JP | September 3, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

Hey…McCain camp…RNC…could you use another million+ voters on your side about now?
Well, perhaps you should look to return your party to its roots in future election cycles and stop ailenating youthful, energeitc, liberty loving freedom fighters,”real” fiscal conservatives and strict constitutionalists.
Most of us simply will not be pulling the lever for you and it goes without saying that we won’t be supporting socialism either. When the Republican party goes back to where they came from, then the re-branding can begin. I personally, would be delighted to bring Gov. Palin along as she could be imo, a rising star in the traditional party. A little education from a team of true conservatives and not neo-conservatives and she could/would be fantastic. I hope she can keep that independent mind in tact throughout the rest of this circus.
Good Luck.

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | September 3, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Neither Obama, Biden, McCain or Palin can compare to Hillary.

Posted by: csh | September 3, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

I am a huge Hill gal but I am so sick of the repulicans, they don’t care about Hillary they made her life hell. The dems better take note look how the are taking up for Palin, DNC, Dems they wouldnt be able to use sexism and envoke Hillary if the Dems had stuck up for Hillary in the primaries, if they had said its not okay to tell her to go iron shirts, its not okay to call her a monster, its not okay to say she is pimping out her child, but the dems in charge chose to remainn silent and now their chickens are coming home to roost.

Posted by: rachel | September 3, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

What I think is unfair is that we protect the rights of some and invade the rights of others. Regardless that Gov. Palin is a female with a family; we are talking about running a country not a state or a local college. It is a fact that as of a few days ago, the world knew nothing about Gov. Palin; therefore, it is unfair that the media be redirected in what direction one should take when covering her personal life. Where was this level of discretion for the current presidential candidates or previous Presidents?
The only sexism in play is that a presidential candidate chose a woman to pull votes. This has nothing to do with her qualification. This is not only scary, but it is a dangerous tactic that insults the public’s intelligents.
Please make this clear, Gov. Clinton is a woman as well, and over 16 million voters believed in her and her ability to run a country. What I believe is that certain persons would feel better if an African-American would loose to a woman rather than present the truth of the fact of the matter is that the world, as a whole, may not be ready for an African-American to take the seat. Therefore, let’s be fair. She has been selected, and we can not hide things that may later put our nation at risk.

Posted by: Ivy | September 3, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Here I thought Palin was mediocre mother an inexperienced
politician with questionable ethics. Turns out it’s all just the medias fault. Thanks Republicans for clearing that up for me.

Posted by: PJ | September 3, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Palin- Wacko far-right wingnut.
McCain- just proved he really is as crazy as everyone said he was.

Posted by: Bob | September 3, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Why did the press ignore John Edwards’ affair for so long? Was that a double standard? Everyone agrees the press should not focus on her seventeen year old daughter.

Posted by: rafraf | September 3, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

A debate on her record, huh? I wonder why she’s been hiding for several days, since McCain selected her. Why doesn’t she give some interviews?

Posted by: Sportin' Life | September 3, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

CAREFUL, Republicans, when you say Obama only has experience as a legislator and Palin has executive experience, are you forgetting that MCCAIN only has experience as a legislator? Maybe Palin should be at the top of the ticket, if experience as a mayor and gov. are the only important kind of experience.
—However, I do agree with the Repubs on one thing: the pregnant daughter is immaterial. Palin’s association with the nutcakes in the Alaska Independence Party is what really matters. Think of it: a vice-president of the US whose husband is a 7 year member of a party that wants Alaska to leave the United States.

Posted by: Gary | September 3, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Folks, please, this is an historic and happy week. Yes, after decades of opposing women’s equal rights at every turn, the Republicans have, in one swift week, become the champions of equality and the scourge of all sexism. Surely Republicans will now propose and pass the ERA and equal pay legislation. This is not a time for anger but for rejoicing. Isn’t it?

Posted by: Nomo Stew | September 3, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

John McCain opposed all equal pay for women from the beginning. Obama/Biden has fought for women rights for years.
If you were for Hillary and vote for McBush, you are voting against women. Of couse there is going to be reported sexism coming from the Obama camp. If mcBush couldn’t play this trick nobody with half a brain would ever vote to reelect Bush via McSame.

Posted by: George | September 4, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

I’m so sick and tired of political correctness. Why cant we ask questions about her experience. Also we have a right to ask if Obama is experienced. This is America and we must know who’s going to govern us. Women need to get their act together and stop claiming sexism when the questions get tough! In politics everything is going to be scrutinized.

Posted by: RES | September 4, 2008, 3:47 am 3:47 am

Interesting, it was fine and dandy to spend almost a year harping on Obama’s religion, labeling him and his wife would be terrorists, and closet racists…but poor old white self-proclaimed “hockey mom” VP shouldn’t be scrutinized…give me a break. Something tells me the “sexism” charge wasn’t an issue when Hillary was on a bridge to nowhere.
The GOP will always be the party of hypocrisy.

Posted by: TLC | September 4, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

It’s not sexist to hold a woman candidate to the same standard as everyone else.
Palin & McCain have injected her status as a mother into the race by pointing to her son in Iraq and her Downs syndrome baby, so it’s only fair to point out her less shining moments as a mother.
She also favors abstinence education, so it’s only fair to point out that it failed in her own family.

Posted by: philly | September 4, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

How can this party (rep) be upset about sexism in a sentence… when they are wearing buttons that say Hottest VP?!?!?!?!!?

Posted by: all4one | September 4, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

I think the sexism charges, particularly Giuliani’s last evening, may be over the top. Remember, John Edwards received a great deal of criticism when he announced his presidential bid, given that Mrs. Edwards had cancer. It was parallel to the concerns about the demands of a special needs infant. I’m not seeing sexism.

Posted by: jane | September 4, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Where do the Republicans get off accusing the media and the Obama campaign of being sexist against Gov. Palin when Rush Limbaugh said “we’ve got a babe on the ticket” and during her speech last night the camera picked up an eldery gentleman wearing a “Hoosiers for the Hot Chick” button. Why aren’t Carly Fiorina and Rudy Guiliani up in arms about that? Maybe it’s because those are actual examples of sexism and not a way to distract the media and the public from the real issues. Plus, Palin herself warned about complaining about the treatment with any kind of a “whine” as “not doing us any good”. If she can’t take the heat that all of the other candidates have been enduring for the last year and a half, maybe she should go back to her ice box (I mean Alaska) and play hockey mom instead!

Posted by: Rebecca | September 4, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

Our VP is HOT from a cool state!
Buttons brazenly worn all over the convention floor?
Don’t they get it? How sexist is that?

Posted by: 1more4REALchange | September 5, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

“There’s a gigantic difference between John McCain and Barack Obama and between me and I suspect my vice presidential opponent,” Biden said.
“She’s good-looking,” he quipped.

Posted by: Think | September 5, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Women wake up and start supporting each other and stop being your own worst enemies. The higher a woman gets in any field opens up the doors for all of us. Governor Palin is more than qualified to be VP and if need be President. The highest offices need a woman’s voice. The sexism has to end in this country. Stop listening to it and think for yourself. Support your qualified sisters. Do it for your grandmothers, your moms, your daughters, your sisters and for the good of America.

Posted by: basil | September 5, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

palin is a good leader and it seems that her bad points gets noticed more than her good ones. her daughter is pregnant big deal. if they are 16 and are popular. than its ok.?
all this is maijor BS

Posted by: kaitlyn | September 15, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Am I the only person here who’s noticed that the *only* people in this entire blog thread, and seemingly on any site I’ve come across, focusing on Bristol’s pregnancy, are McCain supporters? They’re absolutely convinced that Obama supporters are trying to smear her over it, and yet *I’m struggling to find a single Obama supporter who’s bringing the topic up*.
Seriously people. I care that she asked a librarian for her letter resignation shortly after the librarian took offense to her trying to ban books from the library. I care that she drove a town of 5 thousand people 22 million dollars into debt. I care that she hired a lobbying firm to get said tiny down 27 million dollars of earmarks. I care that she spent half her tiny time in office in Wasilla, charging the state extra for “travel” room and board/meals expenses, and was gone for so long that state legislators started wearing “Where’s Sarah?” buttons. I care that half the people in her administration are in her highschool yearbook, such as her ag commissioner picked because despite having no credentials, they “like cows”. I care that under her administration, Wasilla started charging rape victims for rape kits, and that her town turned into the crystal meth capitol of Alaska. I care that in almost every speech she gives, she lies about the bridge to nowhere (she campaigned on support of it, then kept the money when congress turned against it), selling a plane on ebay (never happened), firing a cook (wasn’t fired; they switched to cooking for legislators when she started spending all her time in Wasilla), opposes earmarks (already covered), and on and on; sorry, but candidates who repeatedly tell the same lies over and over lose the benefit of the doubt in my book. I care that she didn’t even get her first passport until 2007, and has only had one serious out-of-country trip in her entire life, having met with a total of zero foreign heads of state. I care that she is so out of touch with US history that she thinks the founding fathers wrote the Pledge of Allegience. I care that she thinks that Alaska is going to be a “refuge state” from the rapture and all sorts of other kooky religious stuff. I care that she didn’t know what the office of the Vice President does in an interview earlier this year. I care that she line-item vetoed 20% of the state’s funding for support for pregnant teenage mothers during a time of massive budget surplus from high oil prices. I care that her administration falsified information to try and keep polar bears off the endangered species list. I could go on and on; there are an awful lot of things about her that I care about.
I couldn’t give a rat’s arse whether her daughter is pregnant.

Posted by: Rei | September 15, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.