By Jennifer Parker

Sep 29, 2008 7:05pm

Stephanopoulos: What’s Next? Congress Mulls Four Options

ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos reports: There are meetings going on right now on Capitol Hill to try to figure out what to do about the $700 billion Wall Street bailout bill that failed to pass the House today.

Congressional sources tell ABC News that what they’re talking about right now are three or four basic baskets of options:

# 1 — Muscle Bailout Bill Through House: Some leaders suggest those House Republicans on the fence will be swayed by seeing what the markets do tomorrow, which could be more bad news. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped over 700 points today as the administration’s bailout bill failed in Congress  This option would see House leaders try again to muscle through the votes they need to get the $700 billion bailout bill passed.

#2 — Pass Bailout in Senate First: Some Senate and House leaders have been talking about letting the Senate go first and pass the bailout package, ABC News has learned. There appears to be broader support in the Senate for the bailout package. This option would see the Senate vote first which would increase the pressure on the House to pass the Bush administration’s bailout bill.

#3 — Make Small Tweaks to the Bill: Congressional leaders wonder if perhaps there are a couple of small tweaks they can make to the package that would bring along the 12 votes they lost the vote by. Option A, sources say, could be adding a line that some economists have said is absolutely necessary for the FDIC to guarantee all deposits in transaction accounts, not just up to $100,000.  That would deal with the credit crunch and it would be quite popular, some on Capitol Hill argue. Option B would be eliminating the mark-to-market rule that many Republicans and conservatives complain about, which ensures financial decision-makers must show their losses in real time.

#4 — Get More Democrats On Board: Finally, one other unlikely option talked about on Capitol Hill is to try to pass the bill almost entirely with the Democratic majority in the House. That would require adding a major stimulus package favored by Democrats, infrastructure spending, unemployment insurance spending, and heating and food stamp assistance for low-income Americans.

All of that is being discussed right now. We’re not likely to hear members have landed on any single proposal until at least tomorrow.

Nothing will be done for at least a day and a half as Congress is in recess because of the Jewish New Year. The Senate won’t be back until Wednesday afternoon and the House of Representatives is adjourned until Thursday.

However the bigger sell to Congress to do something may be the consequences of not acting. More bad news through the end of the week that might do it.

Bailout Politics

Everyone knew it was going to be a close vote, but we’ve never seen anything like this.

There was a Republican president, a Democratic Speaker of the House,  a Democratic majority leader,  the entire Republican and Democratic leadership from both sides of Congress and both presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain arguing for this package.

But a peek at the upcoming congressional races of the people who voted against this package provides some insight.

We calculate there are about 31 competitive House races divided between Democratic and Republican House members, and 24 of the 31 members in competitive districts voted against this package.

No one wants to vote for this. Even those who were arguing for it on the House floor today said ‘we know this package is painful, we know it’s hard to argue that we should be spending up to $700 billion in a way that might end up benefiting the banks.’ It’s a hard pill to swallow despite the arguments about what’s its going to mean for Main Street.

However the fundamental problem for Republicans is that in an election year when the incumbent is not on the ballot, but you’ve had eight straight years of Republicans in the White House, any bad economic news is likely to fall harder at this point on Republicans.

Obama called on Congress to get the bill passed and McCain blamed Obama and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for injecting what he called "unnecessary partisanship" into the equation.

Many Republicans are complaining about a floor speech Pelosi gave prior to the vote, where she laid so much of the blame on eight years of Republican economics and President George Bush’s policies.

The Democrats are arguing it’s unbelievable that hurt feelings would prompt the Republicans to switch their vote and perhaps cause an economic disaster.

Neither presidential candidate has given any indication that they are going to suspend their campaign and run back to Washington, DC to deal with this. However it’s likely well see both Obama and McCain in Washington in person when that vote finally comes.

 

User Comments

By the end of the day the corrupt media will surely blame John Mc Cain for the fact 96 democratic house members voted NO for this bill.
My question is this. Why bother even have elections if the media is hell bent on rigging the outcome anyway ?

Posted by: infoseeking | September 29, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

i oppose a bailout at the middle class’ expense. we have heard doom and gloom scenarios from this administration since iraq. and i don’t buy em anymore. the market will correct itself and those who made poor choices will be penalized, period. that is free enterprise.

Posted by: ron | September 29, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Here is the deal… are their seats SAFE come election time?
Among 38 incumbent congressmen in races rated as “toss-up” or “lean” by Swing State Project, just 8 voted for the bailout as opposed to 30 against

Posted by: Libratine | September 29, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

um, 2/3 of Dems voted for it, 2/3 of reps voted against it, McCain is the leader of their party, and was already claiming credit for having brought the thing together. Country first indeed.

Posted by: Danny | September 29, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

Republicans need to do their share and get 12 more House members.

Posted by: Sandra | September 29, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm

.
AS much as this bailout package makes me ill, I see it as a necessary evil. We have no choice. Otherwise, I see a depression coming our way….I’m stocking up.

Posted by: jen | September 29, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

the media is not rigging anything. Let’s calm down and remember that a Republican, Bush, has been sitting in the WH for 8 years! Re-elected, I might add, after starting a widely unpopular war! So, if the media has a true liberal bias, I’m sure they could have ensured a Kerry victory. This has nothing to do with the media. It has to do with the sheer incompetence of the GOP, Bush and now McCain. Nobody put a gun to his head and asked him to declare that he was going to troop to DC. Nobody asked him to march back to Ole Miss for the debate. He could have skipped it if he wanted to. Nobody forced him to pick Palin. If she can’t answer the Alaska/Russia question for the 3rd consecutive time, that’s the fault of the “liberal” media?! C’mon. Sometimes we need to get our head out of the sand and get a clearer look at what’s happening in the world.

Posted by: Truth17 | September 29, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

McCain and his campaign are a team of the most prolific liars in modern political history… and it appears they are spinning out of control!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Libratine | September 29, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

Why is there no television coverage of the protests in the streets?
The banksters and the complicit politicians are losing their grip because the people don’t believe their lies anymore.
Let the uber rich bail themselves out. The rest of us will need to take care of each other because it is very clear that nobody else will.

Posted by: Pamela Cosmo | September 29, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

… A sweet ‘bailout’ alternative. A plan all Americans would be proud of.
Assumptions:
Financial bust is NOT caused by Democrats and/or Republicans – but is systemic and has been evolving for decades.
Today’s poor financial conditions are symptoms of a failed system (only) and has fueled a never ending and escalating cycle of consumerism and indebtedness among a majority of Americans. Not good.
Fixing a broken system is the only ‘real’ solution while ‘bailing’ out or creating more debt will simply broaden the pain in the short and long term – not to mention devalue the already declining dollar.
Based on these assumptions, the mere suggestion of what follows will stun the planet and awake Americans in ways no one has ever experienced. Invest in the American people. A conjured up political solution in Congress will never work.
7 Point Rescue, Security & Freedom Proposal
1. Emergency and immediate troop redeployment to the homeland – bare minimum skeletal staff to remain in sensitive zones
2. Ensure all Veteran benefits are in place and fully operational to support troops and families
3. Red alert spending freeze all federal non-essentials
4. Invest in new grid system to deliver wind and solar energy from the heartland to all points east and west to be fully installed in 6 years
5. Invest in new transportation systems to include natural gas, hybrid mass transit systems and automobiles with a goal to phase out ALL combustion engines in 8 years.
6. Abolish the Federal Reserve – Federal government to assume responsibility to maintain and create currency. Consider value based currency such as the GOLD standard.
7. Abolish the IRS and federal income taxes to allow the ingenuity of Americans to meet ALL said objectives.
Thanks for listening.

Posted by: dave | September 29, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

pelosi, Obama and Dean have spent years
throwing Propaganda around to “Blame Bush” Blame the Government” for everything, even as they moved forward on destorying the nation.
If Pelosi and the Democratic/chicago machine want to take over the government and business and industry they will have to work at it, and not have it handed to them.

Posted by: seah | September 29, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

Reality will hit and they will pass something.
Fact of the matter is they will not want to face the public when they are out of work and in 4 weeks a lot will be out of work if there isn’t a BIll.
They will be able to say I voted against it, but the economy trumped my concern, etc.

Posted by: Thinking | September 29, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

I believe Paulson was right, the consequences of not passing a bill and passing it quickly is worse by far than just passing the bill. No one really wants to do it, but it is clear that not only the U.S. market, but markets overseas are responding to this financial problem. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi should learn to keep her mouth shut. There was a basic agreement to put aside partisanship and do what was in the interests of the country. She apparently did not get that memo. Just could not wait to point the finger at the Republicans. From my recollection, the Democrats are the ones that instructed Fannie Mae to put 50% of its mortages in the low-income to low-middle income group, a group as a whole who could not otherwise qualify for a new home with NOTHING down. There are other underlying causes, so there is plenty of blame to go around. What really stands out in voters minds right now is the extremely low approval rating of the Congress, now controlled by the Democrats. That approval rating is lower than that by far than President Bush. Congress, in the House vote did nothing to disprove or improve the approval rating. It is well-deserved, for Republicans AND Democrats. Please get off your gluteus maximi and do the republic’s business, please.

Posted by: curtis41 | September 29, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

McCain and his campaign are a team of the most prolific liars in modern political history… and it appears they are spinning out of control!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Libratine
where have youe been?..is this your first campaign?

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 29, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

i’m confused..earlier in the week liberals were complaining about Bush’s plan for 700 billion and bailing them out…using tax payers money , etc…now they are blaming REPS for not passing it..what the H E L L do you people really want?..do you know?

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 29, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Don’t any of you use your brain? President Bush inherited a mess left over from Bill Clinton, who was a colossal disgrace to our presidency. His administration reaped the benefits of President Ronald Reagan’s efforts. As for the war, are you idiots not remembering the attack on September 11th?!? It was unprovoked and the retaliation was UNANIMOUSLY voted YES!!!And don’t forget–President Bush has been fighting a liberal Democratic Congress at every turn.
As for the McCain/Palin ticket – God Bless them both! They are our only hope. When America becomes so gullible that they believe the rehearsed lines from Obama and whats-his-name we are in a sad sad state.

Posted by: Carol | September 29, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

Carol ..well said..

Posted by: LordHelpLiberals | September 29, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Add a provision that eliminates golden parachutes for the execs of failed and failing companies (not just tax them) and the bailout will pass.

Posted by: In_Indiana | September 29, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

@ infoseeking
I think the Republicans wrote the book on rigging the outcome of elections. You all must be running scared, all the old tactics are comming out. Blame the media, if the media was liberal, Bush and Co. would be in jail

Posted by: fearforthefuture | September 29, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

@ infoseeking
I think the Republicans wrote the book on rigging the outcome of elections. You all must be running scared, all the old tactics are comming out. Blame the media, if the media was liberal, Bush and Co. would be in jail

Posted by: fearforthefuture | September 29, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

How can it be that the two guys who got it so wrong right up until we were in the middle of this mess (Paulson and Bernanke) testify before both houses, but neither body saw fit to seek counsel from even one of the many independent economists who’ve all had it right for so long?

Posted by: Redwood | September 29, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm

NO Bailout for wallstreet
That is a real plan.

Posted by: Duane Z | September 29, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Carol & Lord Help Liberals – stop talking to yourself. It is so sick that you feel the need to make a fake person to respond in your favor.

Posted by: caroltoo | September 29, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Yipee!! The great depression 2.0 starts the day after 29-9, *cries*

Posted by: thedayafter | September 29, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Caroltoo – well said

Posted by: carolthree | September 29, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

ABC – Please list the 12 + House Republicans at the Press conference with Cantor of Virginia who chose not to vote for the bill only because their feelings got hurt. They have no place in Congress if they have such thin skin and their are quite of few of us that would like them to find employment elsewhere.

Posted by: Take a hike GOP | September 29, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

Did I hear election rigging? Oh never mind. There is also a solution. POWER SHARING. Obama-President, McCain, Prime minister. Lol :)

Posted by: thedayafter | September 29, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

Blame lies at republican feet, they killed this, now they try and deny that fact. Gutless, irresponsible, political assholess the lot. Come November, remember who killed our economy. the neo-cons.

Posted by: JR | September 29, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Let’s leave McCain and his political opportunism (look like he’s fixing the bailout = economic boost)out of the next round of talks, shall we?
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | September 29, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

Carol,
What Crap!

Posted by: Thinking | September 29, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

This bail out is only a shock absorber, the crash will come sooner or laetr

Posted by: cathy | September 29, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Carol, I appreciate your satiric use of irony… but it might be lost on others.
George W. Bush inherited not a mess, but a record budget surplus. That surplus was the result of an economic plan that was passed by the Democratic Congress on a party line vote. Republicans warned of economic collapse: instead was saw an enormous economic expansion.
For 2/3 of his presidency, George W. Bush had a Republican Congress. Not a Democratic one.
And any disgrace brought to the White House by Clinton for his sexual escapade has been far, far, far exceeded by an administration that treasonously outed a CIA agent, invaded Iraq in retaliation for 9/11 by using trumped-up intelligence, and which officially sanctioned the use of torture – a policy that America had rejected from the time of the Revolutionary War.

Posted by: Malacandra | September 29, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

LordHelpLiberals said: As for the war, are you idiots not remembering the attack on September 11th?!?
You mean the attack that had NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH IRAQ?
Yeah, I remember it – I lived 5 blocks away. And I am still pissed off at GWB for dropping the ball in Afghanistan, and letting OBL escape – just so he could get some payback for daddy in Iraq. And then not even do that war correctly. Talk about screwing the pooch; Bush screwed the whole kennel.

Posted by: Matt V | September 29, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Bill Clinton left a 5 trillion surplus,Lil Bush had a Republican Congress for the first 6 years,and were 10 trillion in debt now.All Bill Clinton did was get a BJ from a fat girl, big deal. Please don’t make me defend Dem’s. And Reagan was an idot, he is the reason alot of people lost there money today in 401k’s instead of having there money in a savings account.
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | September 29, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

I need to correct a factual error in my previous post: by the time George W. Bush leaves office, he’ll have had a Republican Congress for 3/4 of his presidency (75%). Not 2/3 (66%).
Blaming Democrats for the failure of this most miserable administration is simply untenable.

Posted by: Malacandra | September 29, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

You idiotic Republican’s that oppose the bail out for ideological reasons deserve to lose your 401k’s. I sure will not feel sorry for you when your out on the Street with nothing but the clothing on your back. You are too dumb to realize that this is going to hurt everyone–regardless of who is to blame (obviously Republican’s who caused this mess and Wall Street..duh). When you pull the lever to elect McCain, you can do it with the clear conviction that you put ideology before common sense and stupidity before reason.

Posted by: steve | September 29, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

Nancy Pelosi gave a speech before the vote to derail the few Republicans needed for approval. Barack Obama continues campaigning and has done NOTHING to change the vote of some 93 democrats voting against the bailout—Obama has done nothing to rally full support of his own party!!!! Shock but no surprise. Both have none this to give Obama a lead and win the Election—neither care about America…just wealth and power.

Posted by: Ann | September 29, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Sorry, meant that previous one for Carol.
Carol is a little dim. If Clinton is responsible for Bush’s problems, then Carter is responsible for Reagan’s “success”

Posted by: Matt V | September 29, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

And besides, Bill cliton created alot of jobs for Americans in the dry cleaning bussiness and still is I here. :) LOL
EX Republican

Posted by: RGeier | September 29, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Why can’t there be an option #5 – Listen to the economists who say don’t waste taxpayer money on the bailout – instead, eliminate the programs that caused this mess to begin with. It’s cheaper and a faster way to fix this problem.

Posted by: Very Concerned | September 29, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

Nancy Pelosi gave a speech before the vote to derail the few Republicans needed for approval. Barack Obama continues campaigning and has done NOTHING to change the vote of some 93 democrats voting against the bailout—Obama has done nothing to rally full support of his own party!!!! Shock but no surprise. This is deliberate to give Obama a lead and win the Election—neither care about America…just wealth and power.

Posted by: Ann | September 29, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Fire Pelosi who can’t even deliver her own party on a bill…investigate Chris Dodd and Barney Frank for their participation and failure to stop this meltdown, fire all encumbants who were complicit…AND DO NOT BAIL OUT COMPANIES THAT ACTED IRRESPONSIBLY.

Posted by: jenns | September 29, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

GEORGE STAPHANOPOLOUS
ANOTHER LIBERAL PUNDIT HEAD..
NOTHING HE SAYS HERE IS GONNA HAPPEN.
MCCAIN SHOULD STAY AWAY FROM THIS MESS.. THE DEMO CONGRESS IS EVEN MORE GUILTY THAN THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE THEY ARE THE LAW..
ID SAY PUBLIC TRIAL FOR ALL THE CEOS,’
GIVE THEM NO MORE THAN $300 BILLION FOR THEIR TRASHY ASSETS. GIVE EM AN I.O.U, A PIECE OF PAPAER, FOR THE REST. IF IT FAILS, TOO BAD, WE FIND THE CEOS AND MAKE THEM PAY..SELL THEIR ASSETS
ONCE YOU OVERTIGHTEN REGULATIONS, WE BECOME A MARXIST NATION..
THOSE ARE ALL OBAMA FRIENDS,,,FANNIE MAE, AIG, CROOKS… HE WILL THROW THEM UNDER THE BUS NOW..

Posted by: TJ, THE CLINTONITE | September 29, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

I like option #5 :)

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Democrats have their fingerprints all over this socialist mess which intended to give housing to those who could not afford it…what is ludicrous is asking the very entity that caused the mess to fix it…we need to get government’s hands off our markets, and we would be alot better off.

Posted by: jenns | September 29, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

SINCE OPEC AND THE CHINESE ARE SUCKING UP ALL OUR MONEY –LET THEM BAIL US OUT–OR GET OUT—SHUT DOWN THOSE FREAKING WALMARTS–(CHINESE JUNKYARDS)—-SPEND 700 BILLION ON ALTERNATE ENERGY—TO HELL WITH THEM ALL.

Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Remember Reagan’s famous question?
Are you better off now than you were 8 years ago?
DOW 1-19-2001: 10,587.59
DOW 9-29-2008: 10,365.45
NASDAQ 1-19-2001 = 2770.38
NASDAQ 9-29-2008 = 1983.73
CPI, 1-19-2001: 175
CPI, 9-29-2008: 219
Dollar exchange with Euro, 1-19-2001: 1.068
Dollar exchange with Euro, 9-29-2008: .695
After 8 years of a republican president and 6 years of a republican congress, there’s not a whole lot to show for it.

Posted by: Matt V | September 29, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

I want a dpression! Bring it on. It’s time for all of you spend more than earn idiots to pay up. If you can’t live within your means tough! Grow up.

Posted by: Spirit Rebel | September 29, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

“The original strategy of providing only emergency lending during a liquidity crisis made sense. Nationalizing financial institutions does not. When your neighbor’s house is on fire you lend him a hose; you don’t have him sign over the deed to the house before you help him put out the fire,” – Dean Martin, State Treasurer of Arizona. ~~ The failure of this bill today was a good thing.

Posted by: Maude | September 29, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Ok, first off, both parties bear the responsibility of this mess. Second, many economists have sent a joint letter to Congress and the WH to say NO!! Look on CNN and read about the economists who think bankruptcy would be a preferrable choice to bailing these fat cats out. They have it right.
Yes, things will be bad – for a while. But in the long run, it will be healthier for the economy and the financial markets overall.
Do I like this alternative? Not one little bit. I’m already a victim of the economy, laid off because the company was doing poorly, and looking for a new job isn’t getting any easier. I hate the situation I’m in now and if things get worse economically, then I’m royally screwed. But to me, if this fixes the mess in the long run and we can keep this from EVER happening again, I’m all for it.
I am totally against the morons who got us into this mess getting their butts saved to MAYBE fix the problem. If it doesn’t work, how do any of these people think we’re going to get out of it then?
The only sure way to fix the problem and prevent it from ever happening again is to kill off the companies that are into it the deepest. Survival of the fittest doesn’t just apply to animals. Survival of the the most competent business people makes a heck of a lot more sense to me than making idiots fat cats into Emperors! Remember the story about the ant and the grasshopper? Well, those disgusting pigs on Wall Street need to learn the same lesson the grasshopper did.

Posted by: This is SO Old | September 29, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

Senator Obama was right we did take our eye off the ball as far as Bin-Ladin is concerned.Iraq was not where he was

Posted by: jojobo1 | September 29, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

Fire Pelosi and Reid…they are inept. They don’t need the republicans to pass this bill, they just want to hide behind someone when their idiotic plan doesn’t do what it was intended to do.

Posted by: jenns | September 29, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm

The House was right to reject this sorry piece of legislation. While it is necessary to stabilize the financial system, there is no justification for rewarding the bad investment decisions of businesses and individuals. Do you think any of these potential recipients of the proposed bailout were ever motivated by the common good? No I didn’t think so.

Posted by: FedUpUSA | September 29, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I received the following idea that has been circulating around the web and I must say that agree with this email. Take this seriously, I am sick and tired of bailing out the government and these so called high dollar businesses who can’t manage their own funds. I’m against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.
Instead, I’m in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in a We Deserve It Dividend.
To make the math simple, let’s assume there are 200,000,000 bonafide U.S. Citizens 18+.
Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up..
So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billion that equals $425,000.00.
My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a We Deserve It Dividend.
Of course, it would NOT be tax free.
So let’s assume a tax rate of 30%.
Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes.
That sends $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam.
But it means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their pocket.
A husband and wife has $595,000.00.
What would you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family?
Pay off your mortgage – housing crisis solved.
Repay college loans – what a great boost to new grads
Put away money for college – it’ll be there
Save in a bank – create money to loan to entrepreneurs.
Buy a new car – create jobs
Invest in the market – capital drives growth
Pay for your parent’s medical insurance – health care improves
Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean – or else
Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+ including the folks who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.
If we’re going to re-distribute wealth let’s really do it…instead of trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( ‘vote buy’ ) economic incentive that is being proposed
by one of our candidates for President.
If we’re going to do an $85 billion bailout, let’s bail out every adult U S Citizen 18+!
As for AIG – liquidate it.
Sell off its parts.
Let American General go back to being American General.
Sell off the real estate.
Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.
Here’s my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn’t.
Sure it’s a crazy idea that can ‘never work.’
But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party!
How do you spell Economic Boom?
I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion
We Deserve It Dividend more than I do the geniuses at AIG or in Washington DC
And remember, The Birk plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5 Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam.
Ahhh…I feel so much better getting that off my chest.
Kindest personal regards,
Birk
T. J. Birkenmeier, A Creative Guy & Citizen of the Republic
PS: Feel free to pass this along to your pals as a very sobering thought on how to best use $85 Billion!!

Posted by: Susan Hollander | September 29, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I would rather see massive investigations into who told the banks to get involved in handing out loser loans, and prosecution of any and all policitians and corporate executives who profited from the fees generated by giving out said loans, I would also like to see any CEO of a bankrupted bank also prosecuted and their assets seized until it is determined they did not have a hand in sinking their company and profiting from it.

Posted by: jenns | September 29, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Hey Susan.. check the math.. it might be off a few decimal places :)

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

I honestly believe that Nancy Pelosi has a brain disorder…she and her cohorts won’t let us drill for our own oil, wants to hand billions over to crooks who already stole billions, and can’t even get her own party to back her evil schemes…

Posted by: jenns | September 29, 2008, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

I saw the almost unprecedented allocation of Charles Gibson’s half hour Administration cheerleading exercise and was not surprised to find that there was not one minute devoted to alternative plans which would have made any bail out of Wall Street revenue neutral. There are good plans out there; Thomas Hartman’s immediately comes to mind (hint). It would be nice to see ABC report on them. Perhaps, that would be asking too much?

Posted by: MIke | September 29, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Perhaps it will take a great depression to wake up citizens to the fact that socialism doesn’t work.

Posted by: jenns | September 29, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

A majority of Republicans reject the most important bill in recent years, a bill that the Republican president, the Republican presidential nominee and the Republican House leaders have urged them to pass. They do so after the Democratic leadership have worked around the clock for over a week to accomodate their wishes, led by the Republican leaders to believe not once but twice that the Republicans would vote for the bill.
On days like this I feel happy that I am not a Republican. The GOP has become irrelevant. Sad. Shameful.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 29, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Oh how I long for the days when the only trouble our president got into was a blow job. I love how republicans still bring that up. Are you still proud to be republicans? You finally have shot to hell the entire infrastructure of America. Our cities are falling apart, schools are failing and now a economic depression is looming
Thanks but no thanks to more of the same
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: fearforthefuture | September 29, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Oh how I long for the days when the only trouble our president got into was a blow job. I love how republicans still bring that up. Are you still proud to be republicans? You finally have shot to hell the entire infrastructure of America. Our cities are falling apart, schools are failing and now a economic depression is looming
Thanks but no thanks to more of the same
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: fearforthefuture | September 29, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

How ABOUT Congress listens to the PEOPLE…we don’t want a bailout that REWARDS…irresponsible homeowners and banks!
Yes it will be a little rough, but the world is NOT going to end like the mediak portrays! And in the end ONLY the strongest banks and responsible homeowners will survive.

Posted by: MikeFromNJ | September 29, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

SPEND THE MONEY ON ALTERNATE ENERGY AND WE ALL WILL BE BETTER OFF—SCREW WALLSTREET –THE HOME OF MILLIONAIRS

Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

I watched the entire World News report on the economic crisis and the failed bail-out plan tonight. I can understand how the subsequent fall-out will likely impact every American in varying degrees, but what irritates me (and why I’m glad the bail-out failed) is why should the millions of Americans who have been frugal with their finances and avoided risky mortgages, etc. be heavily burdened with paying the price for those who knowingly or otherwise made unwise financial choices? I am especially concerned that the CEO’s of too many lending institutions made milliions personally at our expense and will never be held accountable. Regardless of the economic impact, why should I trust the American government to solve another crisis that private enterprise created AND “solve” it at the expense of taxpayers who may have had no involvement in the risky, if not illegal, activity?
Someone PLEASE answer that for me.
By the way, I am a Wachovia customer.

Posted by: Tom T in Florida | September 29, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

I honestly hope the democrats inherit their own mess…then perhaps the idiot voting population who keep giving them power will finally get how completely stupid and inept they really are…go for it Obama…mess us up but good.

Posted by: whodunit | September 29, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Ann said:
“Nancy Pelosi gave a speech before the vote to derail the few Republicans needed for approval [and] to give Obama a lead and win the Election.”
Of course, Ann. And because their feelings were hurt by what Pelosi said, those poor, sensitive Republicans decided to vote against the best interests of the country, as well as to help Pelosi get Obama elected, by defeating this bill! Is that what you really believe? Please. Since when has any Republican cast their vote based on what Pelosi says?

Posted by: John from CA | September 29, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Roll call on the vote:
In favor: 140 D; 65 R
Against: 95 D; 133 R
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2008/roll674.xml
So 2/3 of Republicans voted against this bill, while 60% of Democrats voted in favor. Thus, if you were angered that Congressional gridlock caused a 7% drop in the Dow today, blame the Republicans.
Let’s go with #4—get the Democrats on board, a few moderate Republicans, and get it done. The Republicans had a lot of input in this bill and then backstabbed the Democrats, because, according to the Republicans, Nancy Pelosi made a mean speech. You’ve gotta be kidding me with that excuse.

Posted by: JoshA | September 29, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

The best option is just to vote again and to see if the Republican neocons want to vote for another trillion dollar one-day loss in the stock market.

Posted by: JAB | September 29, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

how about we forget technologies that have yet to be invented and go after our own oil…what a concept…we will never, I repeat NEVER be completely free of using oil…it makes up most of products we use everyday…even aspirin..go look it up…we will be using oil forever…so we just as well use our own up and then go buy it on the market. For what we would save in one year buying it through foreign merchants, we could pay for this stupid bailout…as we spend 700 billion a year to buy someone elses oil.

Posted by: whodunit | September 29, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Obama is sitting back watching his party emplode, unable to deliver a bill that they don’t need any republicans to pass, his way of helping out, is saying, just call me if you need anything…lol what a dolt.

Posted by: obamaisbraindead | September 29, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

This is another solution and no one wants to hear it or deal with it….Ron Paul has called this collaspe from the start. The link below comes straight from his site…he’s not running for President anymore! Actually, I feel he was never running for President, his mission was to educate the public. I’m a Democrat and I’m tired of both parties!
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/
The federal government and the Federal Reserve are responsible for this mess with their excessive regulations, easy credit, and other money and market manipulation schemes. Today’s rejection was a rejection of further worsening the problem with the same intervention that got us to this point. Yes, there will be some pain because of what the government has brought about, but the rejection of further intervention will make sure that that pain isn’t made much, much worse for many more people.
We now need to turn our attention to getting our financial system back on its feet. As C4L President John Tate pointed out in his email last week, it is time to:
1.) End the Bailouts – Congress must revoke the Federal Reserve’s authority to bail out failed businesses at your expense.
2.) Cut Taxes and Curb Regulation – If we really want to stimulate businesses and revive the market, we need to cut corporate and capital gains taxes, spurring investors to come back to the market and making it easier to attract new workers and clients. It is also time to end failed legislation like Sarbanes-Oxley, which has crippled capital markets, diminished our competitiveness, and greatly harmed small businesses.
3.) Reduce Spending – We must freeze all non-entitlement spending by the federal government at current levels and eliminate wasteful spending both domestically and in our trillion-dollar overseas budget. Our debt has to come down, and it won’t until we start living within our means.
4.) Reform the Monetary System – If we are to have long-term economic progress, we must end the system of printing money out of thin air. The current laws limiting the circulation of gold and silver-backed currency must be overturned. We can no longer base our money on the empty promises of bureaucrats that it is sound.
The market will have to adjust, and the nation will have to deal with the effects of what the government has brought upon us, but the answer is not to weaken the dollar, continue to sell our debt and national security to China and Saudi Arabia, and socialize what remains of the American free market.

Posted by: kennedy | September 29, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm

Vote Tally:
Dems: Yes 140 Repubs: Yes 65
Dems: No 95 Repubs: 133
More Dems than GOP voted for it.
More Dems voted for it than against it.
This is a GOP failure, pure and simple. McCain’s leadership: EPIC FAIL.
House Minority Leader: EPIC FAIL.
House GOP: Country Last. Election First.

Posted by: Matt V | September 29, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Pelosi is a liar and an inept politician. She has the majority and still can’t get thru her bill…if she thinks it’s so great, why does she keep waiting for republican approval…it’s because she knows this bill stinks and is gutless to take any responsibility for it. She is the worst speaker we have ever had in the history of congress.

Posted by: pelosiisstupid | September 29, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

When you are on the brink of the second Great Republican Depression in U.S. History, it’s the worst possible time to have a lame duck President. George Bush is the lamest *uck this country has ever had.

Posted by: hamishdad | September 29, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

jen…your about a dumb as a box of rocks…first of all..its a democratic majority house..and didn’t nancy say..first 100 days..of what ‘NOTHING’ but lip service and helping other democrats rich off scams like frannie mae..Nancy couldn’t run a water faucet and should be run out…and Barney Franks is nothing but a hair-lipped crook that supported the scam…Democrats had 212 votes..but 95 Democrats that do think of Americans voted the right way…’NAY’ for more Democratic Scams.

Posted by: JWx2 | September 29, 2008, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Susan – One slight problem: $85,000,000,000 divided by 200,000,000 people = $425 per person, not $425,000.

Posted by: Paige | September 29, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Jenn said:
“Perhaps it will take a great depression to wake up citizens to the fact that socialism doesn’t work.”
What’s sad is that not only is it raw, unchecked, free market capitalism that got us to this point (as well as to the original Great Depression), but that the capitalists that have sucked up your money have got you fooled into voting for a party that assists them.
It seems to me that the Socialist Democracies in Europe are doing quite a bit better than we are, right now.

Posted by: John from CA | September 29, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Malacandra,
What about me? I’ve got a 401(k) and I’m NOT a Republican.
Sure would be nice to be able to afford to retire someday…

Posted by: LoginIncorrect | September 29, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

ALLWE NEED IS MORE OF WACKO MCCAIN–i am sure his presence really influenced the repub party–however let wallstreet dig itself out of the sewer they have become–mccain could not deliver 12 votes juliani is just another lieing freak

Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Well, it’s obvious that the media is in favor of this insane “steal from the poor and give to the rich” tax bill. Why *are* there no mentions of the protests, the flood of emails, calls and letters to elected officials or the fact that Americans oppose this ten to ONE!

Posted by: Rose | September 29, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

A majority of House Democrats supported the bill. A majority of House Republicans did not. It’s ludicrous for any Republican to blame the other side. The reality is the bill was hugely unpopular and a majority did not agree it was the right answer. Why try to assign blame for that NOT passing? It seems so backwards.

Posted by: LR | September 29, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

John McCain early this year said he would pick a VP who was strong on economy because it was his weak suit…Look out, here comes Palin to save the nation.

Posted by: doug | September 29, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Republicans have been in charge of the Whitehouse 20 out of the last 28 years.
Do you think it’s a coincidence that the best economy of the last 28 years has been ENTIRELY under a Democrat? And the worst has been under… hmmm…. it will come to me soon. I think it rhymes with Tush, or Flush, or Mush.

Posted by: Matt V | September 29, 2008, 8:31 pm 8:31 pm

Rose – Americans (and you) don’t understand the full consequences of the Bill. You must not own a small business, need to meet a payroll, have a crop to plant or harvest, etc. The credit market is frozen and it is hurting small businesses and middle class America. We will ALL be poor if something doesn’t give.

Posted by: Paige | September 29, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

just think how much we would gain if this money was invested in we the people, and be put to alternate energy—-the gain would be tremendis–wow think of the paybach=k—–te hell with the wall st. thieves

Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm

When you’re in a hole, the first thing you do is stop digging. By rejecting this bill today, the House finally stopped the federal government from digging a deeper hole.

Posted by: Buckle your seatbelts | September 29, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

*** how about we forget technologies that have yet to be invented and go after our own oil. ***
How about natural gas, which we already have an infrastructure for, produce domestically, and is one of the most abundant resources on the planet.
Or, do as you say, drill more and wait 7-10 years to see any result.
Doh!

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

doug- I have as much confidence in that as I do in the Wasilla Hockey rink turning a profit.

Posted by: Paige | September 29, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Paige, some Americans don’t have nearly as far to fall (into poverty) as others. You’ll pardon me if I can’t shed a tear for the McCains losing a few of the houses that they can’t remember anyway.

Posted by: Anon | September 29, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

“why should the millions of Americans who have been frugal with their finances and avoided risky mortgages, etc. be heavily burdened with paying the price for those who knowingly or otherwise made unwise financial choices?”
Because it is your job and your house that will eventually be in jeopardy because of this. Markets will slow down, demand will decline, inflation will increase, companies will shut down and unemployment will rise.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | September 29, 2008, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

Whoa… doesn’t anybody remember the lavish housing purchase bubble created by Japan’s banks inflating their value then failing when they didn’t have enough collateral to cover all their overseas loans supporting real estate purchases?
In Hawaii one Japanese billionaire bought 220 homes in a single day, all at the asking price without negotiating. This caused values to rise in a Seller’s Market each sale more than then last. Then when Japanese Banks started to fail, housing prices plummeted, the bubble burst.
Japan’s government didn’t bail the banks out, it passed a law requiring lending institutions to have higher reserves to back the risky loans they were authorizing. For consumers this meant paying higher interest rates which slowed sales, and people to purchase more reasonable homes within their means.
We need to fix the problem and let the market place correct itself. That’s the only way to increase confidence, whereas a bailout only adds to the risk and doesn’t fix the problem.
And, of course, let’s get the hell out of Iraq and take there 80 billion dollar surplus with us. As for Wall Street lets not forget the oil companies who screwed things up with their billions of record profits, let’s make them save Wall Street.

Posted by: Hank Raymond | September 29, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

are we somehow starting to take our country back—-i rather it end now than another lifetime in debt.paying this money back

Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

John Boehner (R) is my representative and he voted in favor of this B.S. bill. Come Nov. 4th, I will be voting for his socialist opponent and pray to dear God that I get a viable Conservative in 2010 to defeat the Socialist I’m voting for this time. God grant me the strength to do what needs to be done!!

Posted by: Bill | September 29, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

*** The credit market is frozen ***
Really? Then why is my bank trying to get me to take out a home equity loan and offering incentives to do so?

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

we should be more concerned with people unable to heat their homes this winter—-i can assure more than a few will die

Posted by: rodney | September 29, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

I am proud of the republican’s and democrat’s that voted no…..they should be able to keep their jobs even though they’ve been part of the problem. Any congressman who thinks dumping a pile of excrement loans into our pockets and allow the banks to walk away should be escorted out of the building immediately! These banks should fail! That’s capitalism! The federal reserve will make us pay for our insubordination….they are the private banks we now call government who started the printing presses today, to degrade our dollar. They are hoping the next few days will scare us into submission…..Bernake, how dare you to try and scare the people into taking these loans! For now….I’ll take a tent if I have to. Sacrifice??? Would that be asking too much for your kids? Don’t you think maybe we’ve spent too much? Na, lets spend some more!!!

Posted by: kennedy | September 29, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm

Nancy Pelosi, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank ought to be forcibly removed from Congress and tried for treason.
I blame Congress and Wall Street!
Paulson should be investigated and prosecuted for fraud
Mr. President I voted for you, twice, stuck by you, defended you, believed in you even when it was hard to, until now. Now, guess what, hold onto your hat….
I AM DISSAPOINTED IN YOU MR PRESIDENT!!!
I am proud to be a middle class American working towards a better life, and doing a pretty good job at it. I don’t use credit even though I have it, I didn’t buy a house I couldn’t afford, I’ve held a job my entire adult life, and pay my taxes like I’m supposed to. I’m not ignorant, my retirement is in the basement, I’m sure. But guess what I don’t care, I don’t care if the stock markets falls, crashes and burst into flames, I don’t care if the global economy does the same thing. I do not want to loan one dime of my money to the federal government or to the stock markets! NOT ONE DIME- NOT ONE RED CENT, NONE!!! They’re liars, crooks and thieves, THEY’RE PREDATORS!
I can live with whatever happens, it’s all just stuff anyway’s right. My middle class family will survive, we don’t need to be “saved” by anyone, I can guarantee you that.
Proud to be a Middle Class American
NO BAIL OUT

Posted by: Lane_G | September 29, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

I’m a little confused. It seems to me that partisanship is playing a huge part of the replies. When one looks at the polls the majority of Americans were against this bail-out. But when one reads these posts and news reports, everybody is jumping all over the Republicans for not supporting the bail-out. You would think that more people than not would be happy about this given the polls.
What about those Democrats that didn’t support the bail-out? Are you going to dog on them too?

Posted by: mak | September 29, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Folks, this scare tactic by Wall Street, the WH and every other politician regardless of party is just that – a scare tactic.
I’m copying some of the commentary from CNN by a an economist “Jeffrey A. Miron is senior lecturer in economics at Harvard University. A Libertarian, he was one of 166 academic economists who signed a letter to congressional leaders last week opposing the government bailout plan.” If you want to read the entire commentary, you will find it here: http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/09/29/miron.bailout/index.html?iref=newssearch
This is what the man has to say and it makes a LOT of sense. Something Congress has lost.
“Talk of Armageddon, however, is ridiculous scare-mongering. If financial institutions cannot make productive loans, a profit opportunity exists for someone else. This might not happen instantly, but it will happen.
Further, the current credit freeze is likely due to Wall Street’s hope of a bailout; bankers will not sell their lousy assets for 20 cents on the dollar if the government might pay 30, 50, or 80 cents.”

Posted by: This is SO Old | September 29, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Why did the Democratics instruct, from the House floor, the 16 freshman Dem’s up for tough re-elections to vote ‘No’?
Why did 5 Democratic committee chairs vote ‘No’?
Why is a significant chunk of the 95 Dem’s Pelosi ally’s?

Posted by: Concerned in OH | September 29, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Is McCain back to Washington? Is the campaign suspended? What about giving the teleprompter to Sarah Barracuda to rally the GOP in congress to support a bill that she does not even understand?

Posted by: Back to Washington | September 29, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

McCain at least tried to do something constructive. Harry Reid played politics, saying first he wanted McCain to come, then tried to blame him for interfering when he did show up.
Pelosi should have not attacked Bush when a bipartisan effort was needed.
She made quite an error trying to scapegoat Bush in her speech in Congress. She was given one minute, but took 12!
Bush tried to reform Fannie Mae in 2003 but was blocked by Democrats. McCain tried to reform Fannie Mae, but was also blocked. Democrats ran Fannie Mae right before it went into the dirt.
And Pelosi and Barney Frank are not doing so well now in their roles as leaders.
They are all Democrats. Obama has continued campaigning as if nothing is happening.

Posted by: Jon | September 29, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

where’s obama and his “leadership”qualities?
MIA, as usual

Posted by: trettione | September 29, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Isn’t it kind of strange that the Democrats want to bail out Wall Street and the Republicans don’t?
How many months to the next guaranteed financial disaster?
This morass has been aided & abetted by Democrats & Republicans every step of the way for at least the last 15 years. All while sticking it to the small guys with revised bankruptcy laws, elimination of usury laws, etc., etc. Partisan, non-credible politics is destroying our country, and there is no reason to believe this bill isn’t more of the same B.S., especially when ramrodded down taxpayers throats with no details, making one of the key culprits the kind of the new $700B kingdom.
The bill didn’t muster public support because it doesn’t pass the smell test. (And people have finally had enough)

Posted by: Skeptic | September 29, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Hey lane G
Nancy Pelosi, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank ought to be forcibly removed from Congress and tried for treason.
What?…………
How about we try the Bush administration first

Posted by: fearforthefuture | September 29, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

The other day, my dad (who is 95) and i were having coffee. We were watching a morning news show and they were talking about the bail out. Out of the blue, my dad asked a very interesting question. Instead of taking 700 billon of the tax payers money and bailing out the rich, why dont we use the money to save social security and medicare. wow, 95 years old and still on top of things.

Posted by: jimt | September 29, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm

I didn’t check the math in the email that I posted. I apologize for that. But I am still against bailing out these big corporations. Yes we are in bad shape financially but there has to be a different way.
One way we should consider saving money (and I admit this is very Controversial) is taking the inmates out of our jail systems and send them to the war. It will stop us from spending so much on taking care of them. They get 3 meals a day, tv, and basically are taken care of by us. If we send them to the war areas they would have to either become better citizens by serving their country or if they desert, they are in a country that doesn’t want us there anyway. So the alternative isn’t as good as becoming better people in general. We wouldn’t be spending so much to house the criminals and also be spending so much sending our good citizens into a religious war that there is no end to.

Posted by: Susan Hollander | September 29, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

If bush had and testicle fortitude, he would do exactly what FDR did and seize the rich crooks money. but we all know that will never happen. bush is one of the crooks.

Posted by: jimt | September 29, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

If the 40% of democrates who voted
against it voted for it would have
passed. Hard to understand why its
failure is the Republicans fault.
Main street is still opposed to it
the circus and the ringleader need
to find a better way to fix this mess
or just let it fix itself.

Posted by: John | September 29, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

News reporters called today’s failure to pass the bailout bill a failure of government. I call it a victory of government by the people. The failure is in the court of the executive branch. Paulson knew of this for many months and likely for several years. He failed to take steps to avoid this. Then he compounded the crisis by announcing a made up deadline. We can easily place the blame for this on the shoulders of Paulson and Bernake.
As for the house vote, I watched the testimony today and the nay votes were there all along. Pelosi’s spoke strongly in favor of the bill. Her condemnation of the executive branch was a convenient way to shift blame.
This bill is necessary only if we refuse to consider alternatives. Scrap the Paulson plan and start over. Since the concern is to get loans flowing to American businesses, find a way to fund regional and local banks all across the country and cut out those who perpetrated this debacle. The market will hand them their verdict.
We need options for those in default of the mortgage. I further suggest that every adjustable rate loan in the country be given the option to renegotiate into a fixed rate without qualification so long as their payments are on time. If homeowners are making what ever sacrifice they need to in order to keep their home then we need to allow them to continue to do that.
As for Paulson and Bernake, they need to be stripped of their positions. There is no way that they were ignorant of this situation more than 12 months ago. I suspect they knew it was coming for several years. But they did nothing. They allowed it to brew to a crisis and then used it as an attempt to grab still more power. Replace Paulson and begin the process of minimizing the power of the Federal Reserve.

Posted by: Gail S | September 29, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Amen John.

Posted by: jimt | September 29, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

There is another option not mentioned in this article. The House Republicans held up an already written bill that accomplishes the same thing as the bailout without the incredible pricetag. They have done the work. They have repeatedly attempted to present it. In the eyes of the media and the house leadership (on both sides of the isle) it does not seem to exist. Why is that?

Posted by: LoopyDane | September 29, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Were Pelosi’s comments wise under the circumstances? – No.. But they are not the reason thie bailout collapsed. In fact we have proof of McCain’s blundering, House Republican Whip Roy Blunt of Missouri is a lead negotiator. In an interview on MSNBC, Blunt said Republican presidential candidate John McCain’s involvement in the discussion yesterday “stopped a deal from finalizing.”
McCain, in his flailing attempts to regain momentum, is making a mockery of this election. He wanted to be the “Maverick” who came to DC to be the Leader in bailout negotiations. With Bush’s help he planned to look like he brought everyone together. The attempt to inject himself into the process and gain headlines was a waste of valuable time. Now it has failed and we will all pay for his arrogance and deceit.

Posted by: jefflz | September 29, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

Repeal the insane CRA of 1977. Eliminate naked short selling. Revise mark to market to be less stringent. And fire the imbecile banking committee Democrats who denied the problem in 2004 labeling naysayers as racist. Oh, and Pelosi is a massive liar. The Democrats should find a new Speaker who knows how to get their committee chairs to vote if they want “emergency” legislation to pass while they’re in the majority.

Posted by: ReginaldL | September 29, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

McCain is gambling with my job and my retirement. So play the casinos if you want to do that.
But not with my money, nor with my future.

Posted by: cta | September 29, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

can anyone imagine where the working men and women of our country would be if bush had gotton his way and done away with social security for his stock market plan. geez.

Posted by: jimt | September 29, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

This country is so prone to panic, haven’t we learn anything from Bush and scare tactics leading up to the invasion of Iraq. Congress, Paulson, will go back to the drawing board & draft another bill with some appeasing changes to make it look good to the taxpayers that will have to pay for this Bail out crap bill. It will eventually get to Bush to be signed which I hope doesn’t happen because how can Bush sign a $700 Billion bail out bill BUT say he wouldn’t sign the Emergency Extension of Unemployment Benefits because its too costly?????. Thats why I can’t wait to vote on 11/4th, I don’t want to see another Republican in the White House for the next 50 years. What a disaster these pass 8 years have been with Bush/Cheney!

Posted by: sherri | September 29, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Pelosi did a very poor job of managing the bill and ultimately failed to get it through the House. She couldn’t even convince her own democratic majority in the House to follow her and vote for it. Clearly Its time to have a new Speaker of the House who is up to the job.

Posted by: Jim Bob | September 29, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

You know what amazes me? Most of us have a grip on what to do. The congress does also….they are protecting a “group” other then us! You can feel it! Democrat’s and Republican’s! These congress people and that “group” are evil! We must stand firm! It will be painful! Stand firm!

Posted by: kennedy | September 29, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

McCain has talked about Privatizing Social Security then tried to shy away from it. Now he’s saying he will put a spending freeze on all government programs except Defense BUT he would say what programs they would be. I hope Senior Citizens and everyone that receives some type of benefit assistance from the government better know exactly who they are voting for because McCain is not the Straight Talk Express, he’s more like the ” I’ll tell you anything to get election” train wreck.

Posted by: traci | September 29, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

If Nacy Pelosi is so tough why could she get 10 of her own Democrats to switch. She hd to come out pointing fingers at the Republicans in order to draw attention from what an absolute disaster she is as speaker. She hasn’t done doodlysquat.

Posted by: Kara | September 29, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Chill……Sarah will sort it out.
Lets start using crabs as currency.

Posted by: Dai | September 29, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

the solution:
1… Is right on the mortgage application form. perjuty or felony to declare false information income/ job situation. Go get ‘em
2.As for Mortgage Brokers/ lenders must hand over their fat commissions checks back for failure to do due diligence.
Problem solved. It was Greed , greed, greed.
so far Dollar is holdin well against Euro, trillions wiped off the stock market. same goes for the asian market right now as I write.

Posted by: vic | September 29, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

The news that the White House wizards were conference calling their financial wizards and assuring them the oversight and the CEO earning provisions were toothless should kill this thing.
Dems should write their own bill that is progressive and helps real people.

Posted by: flounder | September 29, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

This was to be a bipartisan bill produced by a Republican president designed to prevent the collapse of a market that will affect each citizen. Last time I check by meant two not one. The Democrat supplied over 60% of the vote. All that was required was for the Republican party to support their leaders. Even if they would have delivered 40% of the Republicans it would have worked. As it stood they delivered 33%. That is not bipartisan. It’s time out for fighting. We must work together to get it done or risk being on the soup line just like the Great Depression. I say get it done. Tnen fix it so it doesn’t happen again.

Posted by: A conservative Christain Voting for Obama | September 29, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

The saddest part of all this is that there are people in power who will stop at nothing to achieve their goals. I’m talking about a certain female speaker who deliberately side tracked this bill with partisan bullying in order to find an excuse to add the Democratic agenda perks to the bill, cram it through by arm twisting their own party members and get the Democratic presidential choice elected in November. Welcome to socialism that will ultimately kill a free society. Unless………..

Posted by: Wild | September 29, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Perfect timing!!! Its a election year and both Houses are hearing from their constituents BIG TIME. My Congressman has a message on his website thats it out of service!!. American people have woke up to the realization that why should I pay for a $700 BIllion dollar baill out bill when I don’t know how to pay my bills for this month and what is Washington doing to baill me out. People are ticked off in this horrible economic sinkhole we are in and BUSH/PAULSON who leaves office on 1/20/09 shoves this bail out bill and Congress almost got away with getting it to Bush. It will get to Bush in another form with some changes and Bush will sign it AND then again maybe not!

Posted by: chris | September 29, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

I’ve said it a lot of places, and I’ll say it here. Batten down the hatches. Get ready for another Republican caused depression. The stock market alone lost over one Trillion dollars today.

Posted by: JAB | September 29, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Option #5 – Add criminal charges for anyone involved in defrauding US taxpayers through the Community Revitalization Act.

Posted by: Catherine | September 29, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Nice try, traci – the old scare the old folks tactic. If you have the guts, read this NY Times article and weep:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.htmlres=9E06E3D6123BF932A2575AC0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print
And then try some effort and research what has been happening to F & F the past 15 years or so. You’ll see what the Democractic policy of ‘affirmative affordability’ has wrought.

Posted by: kriuk | September 29, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

The best thing about this is when barnie loves franks and The one, take over there wont be any money left to pay for socialism.

Posted by: Don | September 29, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Why are there only 4 options? For one thing, why do we want a bad bill passed? And secondly, for all the great economic minds that we have in our country George Stephanopoulos can only come up with 4 options as presented by Congressional sources? Please … depending on our Congress to do anything right is like asking pigs to get out of the mud. It just aint gonna happen.

Posted by: mak | September 29, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

I have a small business and, if Obama were to raise the corporate tax rate as he plans, I will be letting 20 employees go. Their work will be shifted to my remaining employees. That will allow my business to survive a 4-5% increase in federal tax. After that, I will be raising the price to my customers to make up the remainder of the corporate tax increase. I may have to raise it further to make us the new FUTA and personal income tax I have to pay – after all, I have a mortgage too, and if I don’t pay it, I get foreclosed.
I will not allow the identity and policies of the president of the United States to cause the failure of my business. So, save up your tax refund, because you will be paying it many times over in increased costs of goods and services as businesses like mine adjust to an Obama presidency. And pray that your job is absolutely essential to the day-to-day operations of your employer, because if it is not you may well find yourself not having to worry about paying taxes at all.
I prefer not to fire my employees and raise my prices. So I will be voting McCain.

Posted by: SmallBiz241 | September 29, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

JimT
lets see, a stock market that is down 7% and might go down nother 7%, compared to a social security that will go bankrupt in 10 years? And will be total gone in 25.
If you think this mess is a crisis, what until social security goes Trillions in the hole! Oh and the “safety box” that is social securities “assets”. IOUs from general revenue

Posted by: chris | September 29, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Congress should stop finger-pointing and trying to get elected and spend time on *what we elected you for*: to make the hard decisions that will keep the economy on track. This isn’t a career maker or breaker, it’s our national economy, our 401(k), our life savings.
Please stop the bickering and pass something tomorrow.

Posted by: Tami | September 29, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

Which ABC/Democrat nitwit wrote this tripe? Stephie?
The only thing needed for clenchjaw Pelosi to pass the stupid bill is to get 12 of her BCC racists to vote for it. They are in the safest districts in the country – gerrymandered high-majority black districts, where they get 100% of the black vote and most of the white nitwit/liberal vote. They all voted against it!
Jesse “Kung Fu” Jackson won reelection in 2006 with 84.8% of the vote – if O’Bambi and Pelosi can’t get that idiot to vote the way they want, neither of them deserves their office. He’s functionally retarded and couldn’t figure out the economics of a lemonade stand.
This blog is a fraud and a lie. This issue is about liberal, nitwit Democrats, and nothing else.

Posted by: Jaibones | September 29, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Will you all stopped it. There are people reading this website and they are influenced by what they are reading. The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. Obama said to stay calm. Let’s get together and do what needs to be done. Remember we are all Americans. My concern is that China, Russia, Iran, Venezela (sp), etc will begin to buy up our assets and gain control over much of our country. Have you thought about that? As stocks dip or businesses become insolvent or even need money to survive, what prevent other countries from buying up the assets? Think people, think!!!!

Posted by: A Citizen | September 29, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

So, let me get this straight…. Our economy is in the toilet, the market lost a record 777 points today, Republicans AND Democrats can’t come to an understanding on how to deal with this mess, but, HEY it’s a holiday so they are going on a little break??? Give me a break!! Clearly they all care deeply about our country. If they care as much as they claim they should have voted to stay in Washington until SOMETHING was figured out!! Anybody else feel let down??

Posted by: RB | September 29, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

Let’s explain… Democrats force markets to give loans to the underclass. People see their home prices rise due to the increased demand. Greedy people buy/sell three-four homes. Greedy companies buy/sell millions of mortgages. The underclass can’t pay their loans back. All unwinds in the opposite manner. Got it?

Posted by: Right of the One | September 29, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Reminds me of the Scribes and Pharisees in power during the days of Christ. They had all the information to make the right decision but where blinded by their own political mortality. The same arrogance in our Congress could be catastrophic. But all will be well…the politicos will still be getting a paycheck.

Posted by: Wayne | September 29, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

The problem is EVERYONE is TALKING.
No one is LISTENING.
Good Luck, America. You are being stupid, arrogant, and greedy. You deserve what you get.
The Republicans are freaking out about losing.
The Democrats are pointing fingers.

Posted by: Wagthedog1001 | September 29, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Dont worry the one is coming and like wow dude everything going to be groovey dudes!

Posted by: Don | September 29, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

I’d love for them to send it to the senate so the Messiah, Lord Obama could vote “present”.

Posted by: JR | September 29, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Let me get this straight…the dems have had a majority in both the senate and house (nearly 2 years)and could not get a bill passed (94 dems nay to 66 repubs nay)so they blame the repubs…so who are they going to blame when bush is no longer president and obama is??? At least I will have the satisfaction of saying “Hey..I didn’t vote for him.”

Posted by: checks and balances | September 29, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Let’s explain… Democrats force markets to give loans to the underclass. People see their home prices rise due to the increased demand. Greedy people buy/sell three-four homes. Greedy companies buy/sell millions of mortgages. The underclass can’t pay their loans back. All unwinds in the opposite manner. Got it?
———-
Gosh this comment should be engraved. I am going to save this one, if you dont mind ,Right of the One
Why don’t you send it to COngress. it could’nt be more clear and concise.
One simple word GREED.

Posted by: vic | September 29, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

I like the idea of
“financial decision-makers must show their losses in real time”. At least it will help to proactively manage the risk.

Posted by: Tim | September 29, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

It was mentioned before. You like this crisis, wait until the boomer hit social security and watch the crisis that comes with that.
Our government has written promises it can’t keep. And the bills are coming in now.
Not quite gold and shotgun shell time, but it going to get a LOT more painful in the near future

Posted by: fed up | September 29, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

When we borrow from the banks we pay interest. How much interest do you think the banks will pay to taxpayers? For years banks have capitalized on credit card interest rates, penalties, mortgage late fees and seized assets. Somebody made a lot of money here. Why can’t they bailout the banks? Remember 4% controls 95% of the wealth of our country. Let them do the “patriotic” thing!

Posted by: Mat | September 29, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

There is one option that will sway more than enough votes ,if is enacted. That is to make this a one-time bailout by repealing the laws that got us in this mess. The Community Redevelopment and Community Reinvestment Acts are stiill on the books, forcing lenders to make bad loans. The DemocRATS are responsible this BS. Repeal the CRA’s and THEN pass the bail-out. Only then will there be enough support.

Posted by: pharright | September 29, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

I’m not in favor of bailing out Wall Street. However, I don’t believe it’s responsible to fiddle while Rome burns. The warnings were too late. The regulators didn’t do their job. SO WHAT? If we don’t do what we can, the economy may come to a screeching halt. Hold your nose and let them vote for it. Winning the vote may mean losing the overall war—and that means people lose their life savings. The rich will still be rich. The rest of us will be the ones that suffer.

Posted by: JQuiz | September 29, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Economic Collapse in America
When it comes to the Wall Street bail-out, I and the people here that I have talked to in Califorina’s 49th District all agree,
Jail em’, but don’t Bail em’. Let em’ fail and rebuild an ecomonic system that works for everybody.
It seems Wall Street, has now figured out a way to rob the US Treasury. It must not be allowed for greedy CEOs to rape the American economy. They must not be allowed to go unpunished and escape the harm they have caused the American people. I ask you, what would happen if we just let Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Lehman Brother and AIG go belly-up and fail, instead of giving their greedy money grabbing CEOs a million and a half bucks a month. In my opinion, I see this as a Wall Street power grab of the US Treasury by the Lame-Duck Bush Administration and his Cronies. They are not interested in the good of the country-only their pockets. We should punish them all for this dastardly deed against fair play in business. Graft and greed are not a part of our Democracy. We should seize all their assets and books and divide it up among their shareholders. Then we should use this bailout money, and rebuild America’s infrastructure and create a new economy based on the welfare of the people once again. George E. Buttner

Posted by: George E. Buttner | September 29, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

I am sick of the Republicans. I am sick of the Democrats. I am sick of the blame game when both parties are equally responsible in this mess. Since Carter all of our Presidents have embraced deregulation of varied industries on their shifts. We deregulated the banking industry under Clinton, gave a steroid injection to the Community Reinvestment Act and put no good consumer protections in place in the late 90′s with the support of both Repubs and Dems. We had McCain in 2005 ask for more regulatory oversight of Fannie and Freddie as it became apparent there were problems brewing and the Dems squashed it. I hate Phil Gramm but I also hate Phil Gramm’s boss, David Wolff, who is an advisor to Obama. Both parties are up to their neck in campaign contributions from Wall Street, in particular those on the banking and finance committees, and this year the Democratic nominee Obama has the dubious distinction of getting more money from Wall Street then his Repub opponent. You have Biden who is is bed with the credit card industry and has been for years. I am not a fan of the Repubs, in fact I expect little if anything from them, but I’m sick of the Dems taking every bill and decorating it like a Xmas tree, thinking we’re stupid enough to believe they can cut taxes and spend on new programs and the hypocrisy of people like Pelosi today- who gets campaign contributions from Wall Street, has personal investments in AIG and has the audacity to take no share in the blame.
There’s enough blame to go around and she’s no innocent and is already putting personal investments in T Bone Pickens. They’re all in bed with Wall Street, both parties, and if there was ever a time for a third party it is now.
Whoever gets in no doubt will be a one term President so now’s the time.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 29, 2008, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

It was a bad bill that wouldn’t have accomplished anything. The mortgages and other bad loans need to be marked to their value. At that point the financial concerns (lenders) need to raise capital to acceptable levels. that is all there is too it. To accomplish the former one can lower the principal on all home mortgages to 90% Loan to Value and reset the rate to 5 1/2%. This keeps people in their homes. The financial concerns take a hit which they will have to no matter what. The lenders then raise capital by stock rights offerings which the treasury can backstop with preferred and warrants. To induce new loans the warrants can be cancelled provided the lenders have asset growth (new loans) meeting a predetermined amount. Some lenders will have to be liquidated-too bad. Also foreign concerns can have their own governments bail them out or be liquidated by us.
The problem is over-leveraged bad loans whether criminally originated or not. The mortgage loan problem can be laid directly on the Congressional leadership which refused administration proposals to rein in FNM and FRE shenanigans, not as Pelosi accuses otherwise.

Posted by: cassius king | September 29, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Those who think that this bailout plan is a plan to bailout Wall Street or rich people, please rethink again. You guys will be crying and begging once you realize that you can not obtain any more mortgages, credit card loans, student loans for your kids, car loans, etc. Those of you who have 401K accounts, good luck looking at the negative return on your accounts. This bailout package, as much of an evil it is, is very necessary to restore the financial market and bring things to normal again. Otherwise, see you guys who oppose these bailout in unemployment lines. By then, it will be too late, even the govt may not have money to pay the unemployment benefit. Good luck!

Posted by: Realist | September 29, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

To qoute the ones main dude REV Wright,’The dems chickens have come home to roost!’

Posted by: Don | September 29, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

So there solution is to add MORE PORK to the bill, and try again!!! Jesus, no wonder our country is flat broke. Vote the bums OUT NOW! Or watch this country turn into a failed state overnight! Everybody who voted for this bill needs to be dismissed from office. Bailing out billionares while others live in their cars and tents in public parks for the 1st time since the last depression is NOT a record worth a second term… Or ANY term!!!

Posted by: hmn | September 29, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

$425 is the correct number. The options seem to narrow.

Posted by: TeeJay | September 29, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

TO A conservative Christain Voting for Obama,
Are you SURE you are CONSERVATIVE and CHRISTIAN? It seems to me that CONSERVATIVE and CHRISTIAN is not in the Obama dictionary.
If your support is for Obama, that’s your choice.
But identified yourself as CONSERVATIVE and CHRISTIAN and vote for Obama is MORONIC. Policies and beliefs are TOTALLY incompatible.
I have seen these blogs and have concluded that MOST of these are paid Obama operatives. So, I refrained from commenting. But your post caught my attention, I just have to reply.
NOTHING’s PERSONAL… Just COMMENTS.

Posted by: Voter In America | September 29, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

Libratine:
Your comment below says something to me. They got a hell of a lot of phone calls saying you better not vote for this! 30 people up for re-election don’t buck their home turf people.
Here is the deal… are their seats SAFE come election time?
Among 38 incumbent congressmen in races rated as “toss-up” or “lean” by Swing State Project, just 8 voted for the bailout as opposed to 30 against

Posted by: kennedy | September 29, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Even as a Democrat but an American first, I find it despicable that Nancy Pelosi would flame passion and derail and sabotage the vote – just to advance the political prospects of Senator Obama.
Enough is enough for me with the Democratic party- I still will not support the Republicans – but will vote for John McCain this fall. I was leaning- Nancy Pelosi pushed me over.

Posted by: American Voter | September 29, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Facts are facts…since the dems took over Congress—-we have flown downhill at speeds superman would be proud of. Politicians are bad, but the dems are the worse.

Posted by: chattyway | September 29, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

The meltdown was brought about by libs like Dodd, Reid and Obama who voted FOR the CRA which forced banks to make risky loans to minorities AND which led, as well, to their giving mortgages to illegal aliens (who helped start the subprime debacle). McCain has refused to hammer this home. To win, he MUST tell the American people “why” the meltdown occured and “who” brought it about. Clinton was President when the CRA was created, not Bush 43.

Posted by: levotb | September 29, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

To American Voter,
WOW! That’s the BEST post I’ve read so far. “Even as a Democrat but an American First” What a great slogan. Maybe some of the Dems in these blogs would take notes.
Thanks American Voter, You are a RARE BREED in these political turmoil.

Posted by: Voter In America | September 29, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

– Facts are facts…since the dems took over Congress—-we have flown downhill at speeds superman would be proud of. Politicians are bad, but the dems are the worse. –
You have got to be kidding! What ‘facts’ are you referring to? The fact that the democrats tried twice to pass legislation which would of, among other things, closed the enron loophole and brought gas prices back down immediately, only to be vetoed by Dubba?

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Muscle it thru the House? Muscle it thru the Senate? Tweek it? Get more Dems on board? The plan is a piece of crap, in both its original form and as modified for today’s vote. Doesn’t anyone have any different concepts to explore? I do. And I’m just one of the Main Street dummies, 300 million strong. The lack of leadership and intellect in the legislative and executive branch of government at the federal level is astounding. Maybe the Nation is better off to go down in financial flames and start all over again from scratch.

Posted by: Dan | September 29, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

A good economic plan would eliminate some of the blame game in the congress and allow them to take credit for doing something intelligent. 1) modify the mark to market calculation using a financial range spliting loan valuation bundles over a 5 year range,and include only the first year on the balance sheet with a note that the remaining 4 years are not valued due to unstable market conditions. 2) Have congress fund one year at a time as the value changes annually. The loss to cash ratio would be smaller and provide time for assets to increase in value. At least in theory it could work but one needs courage to try, in times of hardship.
Good Luck.

Posted by: Negative I.Q. | September 29, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Read through the statistics. The Majority of Americans approved the failure of this bill. 55% to 45% ABC News poll. Why? Because this bail out would not positively impact the economics of the average American.
Are you tired of high fuel prices, high food prices, lower pay? Jobs have been outsourced overseas by CEO’s of banks and major institutions for years. It is time to invest in America, not in Wall street. Declare a “War on sending US Dollars overseas” and then your life will be better!
Bailing out the financial institutions will not put money back in your pocket!
Instead, force our congress to invest in America through Real Public Transportation, Alternatives to Foreign oil, No to monies of any type being sent overseas by our Federal Government!

Posted by: munichtexan | September 29, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

when a country falling a sick or crisis,what we should do at once ?what is the main resolution or necessary methods so as to cure quickly and correctly?
any super person didnt vote if he really owns the responssiblity to the society and the sense of the common american people ?
we can observe the result of hesitation . what is the really judgement,can lead this country with decent acctions?
shame the politicians who only publicly rebuked others and didnt vote
the bailout and a month or a year later we can view those results of hesitation.

Posted by: jessie | September 29, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Obama declared that he is the CITIZEN of the WORLD! One day he will become the PRESIDENT of the WORLD, and those “loonies” that follow will wake up for a surprise!
We are SOCIALIST NATION! You all will have EQUAL properties/possessions no more no less.

Posted by: Voter In America | September 29, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

To Voter in America. Yep. Been a Christian since I got caught in a house fire and while in the hosiptal he saved me. I have walked with him and is a card carrying Baptist (smiling). As an Amnerican, I believe in the conservative values. But as an American I also know that Republicans are not the only ones who have conservative values. My family and I are definitely conservatives and guess what? We are definitely voting for Obama. No offense taken!

Posted by: A conservative Christian | September 29, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Don’t support this!!!! No matter how bad markets look! Let the market correct itself. Do you want them to be able to prop up these ridiculous prices?
Oil drops because the bill didn’t go through. This is bad?????? No. Its the market finally breaking its fever. Let it get better and quit trying to prop up these horrible prices! Say NO to the FIX!!!! Doing nothing IS better!!! The pain of this CRA act must end now!!!

Posted by: CBenn | September 29, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

– Enough is enough for me with the Democratic party- I still will not support the Republicans – but will vote for John McCain this fall. I was leaning- Nancy Pelosi pushed me over. –
Oh, this is priceless! You base your vote on what SOMEONE ELSE does!

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a We Deserve It Dividend.
I like it, just add the stipulation that the money must be used to pay off debts first…oversight can be through the mortgage holders.
Secondly EVERYONE NEEDS TO READ THE FEDERAL HOUSING ENTERPRISES REGULATORY REFORM ACT OF 2005….TO SEE WHO WARNED OF THIS AND TRIED TO ACT ON IT BEFORE IT BECAME A CRISIS..caused by relaxed lending implemented by the democrats in 1992/and again in 1998….this is how the demcorats are involved..
thirdly the demcorats had the numbers to pass this if their own party members had supported it %40 of DEMOCRATS REJECTED THIS BILL along with %67 of REPUBLICANS…
Fourth…PELOSI IS INSULTING AND SO INTERESTED IN PLAYING POLITICS THAT IT IS JUST SCARY
fifth…republicans were being railroaded by Pelosi and Reid and Dodd who by the way has benefited financially from frannie and freddie until MCCAIN CAME TO TOWN \
let’s give credit where credit is due
sixth…reducing the capital gains tax which is %35 here and %0 in china…will encourage large corporations with lots of money to stay and EMPLOY YOU…OBAMA calls it tax cuts for the rich.. I call it COMMON SENSE..if a business has to pay 350,000 more a year on $1,000,000 where do you think they are going to put their money?
IT DOESN’T TAKE A HAVARD DEGREE TO FIGURE THIS OUT….YET OBAMA AND THE DEMOCRATS DON’T GET IT…
whose going to pay for all his programs when there are no more large corporations running in the U.S. because of taxes?

Posted by: TIGGERWARD | September 29, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

ummm.. dem’s have a majority… why arent they passing whatever they want?!? This is ridiculus that 3 out of the 4 options are meant to push republicans into supporting this crap plan…

Posted by: indyvoter | September 29, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

To A conservative Christian,
You missed my point. I NEVER equate conservative with Republicans. What I tried to point out were:
Conservative Values:
Respect LIFE
LIVE by the COMMANDMENTS
Worship NO OTHER GOD
etc…
I had been a life-long Democrat, my parents, my siblings ALL had been Dems and pretty much vote the party line.
The DEM. PARTY LEFT us, so we SWITCHED.
I’m signing OUT…

Posted by: Voter In America | September 29, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

forget the blame game. And forget “tweaking” the bailout bomb – err bill…. It needs to be scrapped and we need to start over with something that might make sense.
Here is what I propose: The “bailout”should instead be a bank incentive: The banks that are willing to (a) lower the principal owed on loans for each house based on the drop in price of the house due to the “bubble” and (b) lower the interest rate of the ARMS to a fixed rate conducive with the market rate perhaps with the credit score factored in somewhat – will in turn be backed/insured by our government and the “bailout” money that would have been included in the wall street bailout will be used as incentives to the banks for (a) and (b) above, to offset the losses resulting from (a) and (b) above. Banks that do NOT participate will be on their on – no backing, no incentives.
In fact, further incentive should be provided to the banks that are willing to take over the home loans , and apply (a) and (b) above to those loans -from the banks that do not want to comply. This process should be overseen and regulated. Additional incentives would be avalable to banks that would also reduce their banking fees, to include dramatically reducing their credit card late fees.
I think that this type of measure would help to stabilize and even improve the economy – bringing home prices and the housing debt back to a reasonable level, keeping afloat the banks that are willing to participate in the endeavor, and allowing the people of our country to get back to their daily lives. With the “panic, doom and gloom” behind us, we could resume spending money- maybe a little more cautiously than before, but nevertheless, get some money flowing through a currently stagnating economy.

Posted by: gloria | September 29, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Mc Cain for the fact 96 democratic house members voted NO for this bill.
My question is this. Why bother even have elections if the media is hell bent on rigging the outcome anyway ?
Posted by: infoseeking | Sep 29, 2008 7:13:26 PM
Another it’s all the media’s fault. When are you Republicans going to take responsibility for anything. Today a bunch of Republican idiots trashed the entire US financial system. Yep I know there are some idiots on the dem side but the difference is that they are a minority, in the Republican house they are the majority. I’m hopeful that this latest fiasco from these nut cases will be the first step in the breakup of the Republican party or at the least a major schism.

Posted by: John | September 29, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Let me get this straight: The same Democrats who say Bush is a liar who misled the country…who say that Congress didn’t take its time on Iraq…who say that the press didn’t take their time and investigate Bush’s claims–NOW want this huge spending bill to be passed ASAP because Bush says the world will end if it’s not? Kind of ironic, dontcha think? (Should we call them Alanis-Democrats?)

Posted by: willie | September 29, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

This mortgage mess can be tranced to Democrate legislation, and to Democrats Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd. I say we let ROME burn. No Bail out. Democrats Chris Dodd, and Barney Frank need to be investigated. Blaming Bush for stuff is just bad scape goating, and works only on the stupid masses, or the kool-aide drinkers. Therefore I say……Let ROME Burn !!!!! Maybe the media journalist can get real jobs afterwards. LOL No Bail out !!!!!! Burn baby Burn !!!!!!!!!

Posted by: jon | September 29, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Colonel Reb says to keep Barney Frank, Nancy Polosi, Harry Ried, and Charlie Rangle in front of the cameras until election day. Keeps Obama/Biden/Ayers/Dorhn/Wright/Fleger out of the headlines. Should lead to a nice Republican sweep of congressional elections and a McCain victory.

Posted by: Colonel Reb | September 29, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

To American Voter. Sounds to me as if you are one of the individuals looking for any reason to not vote for Obama.
I heard Pelosi’s speech and for people hearing it to deliberately withhold their vote because of it is incredible. I do not believe the Republicans were on board for one of four reasons or maybe all:
1) They do not want to be associated with Bush. The risk was just too great.
2) They are afraid that they will lose their seat come November, if they vote for it.
3) They do not want to strengthen the economy and risk Obama gets credit if the economy begins to strengthen.
4) They just plain did not want to go along with the Democrates.

Posted by: A conservative Christian | September 29, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

This whole mess was created by the Dems when they blocked attempts to clean up Fannie & Freddie in 2004. Now they are doing all kinds of stunts to make it look like its only the Republicans fault. Please check this link to see the video on how the Democrats blocked the clean up proposal in 2004.
http://hotair.com/

Posted by: Truth Teller | September 29, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

I’m willing to hear any coherent explanation of how Bush and the Republicans are to blame for this mess. The only clear things I see are that Democrats argued that Fannie and Freddie were fine and they crashed. Pelosi and friends promised to end the war in Iraq and couldn’t deliver. Today Pelosi and friends couldn’t deliver again.
Seems to me Democrats are the ones showing a consistent history of failed policies.

Posted by: andy | September 29, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Please take a few minutes and watch this to the end. It is crucial to our country.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/09/burning_down_the_house.html
Everything in this video is true. You can Google the information as fact.
Let us take our Country back.
Please pass along – post on websites, blogs, chat rooms, your friends.

Posted by: Vicki | September 29, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

What good is keeping your access to credit if you lose your job?
Get real Wall Street and Main Street meet at the same intersection. Unfortuntaly many low income people share the same trait , a lack of understanding of how money works.

Posted by: al | September 29, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

Obama didn’t call any house democrats before the vote. Obama showing no leadership.

Posted by: Jeff | September 29, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

If we bail anything, it is something backed by real assets, not derivatives of hedges–whatever the weird a$$ collateral is.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 29, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

This is Pelosi’s fault. It’s quite obvious she is not fit to be in such a powerful position. They had the votes until she used a pre-vote speech to trash the right. What happened to “Civility” and “Integrity”??? She’s a brilliant example of what’s wrong with the left.

Posted by: Ryan | September 29, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

I can’t believe how many idiots have post that the stockmarket belongs to the rich cats. I venture to say that the large magority of workers and retirees have money invested in the stockmarket either directly or throught 401K investments. If the country is pulled into a depression because our government can’t work together in a non political way to solve this issue it will hurt a lot more than the taxes required to fund this bailout. I blaime both sides for their failure.

Posted by: Rich | September 29, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

First business credit drys up and the reaction is to lay off employees, then that laid off employee takes his credit card to buy cloths for his children but finds out that the credit card company just lowered his credit so now he has to pay with cash which he doesn’t have because he has the same brain matter as sarah palin and thinks that he was sticking it to the rich when in fact he was sticking it to his own kids.

Posted by: al | September 29, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

No matter who’s fault it is is not gonna help your kids when your feeding them cat food.

Posted by: al | September 29, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

I looked at those four possible new options for another attempt, and thought to myself- they just don’t get it. Tricky new ways of voting, and slight tweakings don’t cut it. This bill needs a major overhaul. And don’t blame it on Obama and the Democrats, Mr. McCain. Your own party is mostly at fault. After all, it’s their President’s bill. Passing this bill as it is gives Wall Street a permission slip to do it all again. Start over, and this time don’t take the citizenry for fools. “The future doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted. It belongs to the brave.” — Ronald Reagan

Posted by: Richard | September 29, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

We are all to blame for this mess!!! I say NO to the bailout!!! Allow Wall Street to fall and the depression to begin!! History is only repeating itself and we did not learn from the first depression, maybe we will learn to live with less in simple times!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | September 29, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Its pelosi’s fault, its McCains fault, its Obama’s fault. Junior shut up and eat your cat food.

Posted by: al | September 29, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Queen Pelosi should resign.

Posted by: FloridaCounts | September 29, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

THE PROBLEMS= WITH A DEPRESSION IS THAT ITS THE MIDDLE CLASS WHO GET SCREWED, THE POOR WELL THERE JUST A LITTLE MORE POOR AND THE RICH WELL THERE JUST A LITTLE LESS RICH BUT THE MIDDLE CLASS THERE SCREWED.

Posted by: al | September 29, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Congressmen joe courtney of Connecticut is a democrat who voted against the bailout. What a fool.

Posted by: al | September 29, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Pelosi’s fault ? how many americans strung out thier credit cards, how many americans got mortgages they could not afford. Yes the blame lies with the stupid segment of the american population also.
STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES.

Posted by: al | September 29, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm

Why were Democrats unable to get 12 votes from the 95 Nays recorded today? This is not a Republican problem. The Democrats have the majority. They should not have needed even one vote from the Republicans yet 65 kindly went along to help the country.

Posted by: Nutmeger | September 29, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Let them go back to work on this bill in the morning if it’s so imperative that we get something passed. Oh, wait- I forgot! Tomorrow’s a holiday…………….:-(

Posted by: Richard | September 29, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

It does not matter if you are poor, middle class, or rich we are all screwed!!! Every politicians in this country on both side have not vote for the common people. I say, let Wall Street fall and allow this country with it’s citizens rebuild itself. That is the fair thing to do.

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | September 29, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Options:
1- Nancy Botox and Barrney the purple congressman already tried that, it failed
2-Harry won’t do any better than Nancy.
3-Samll tweeks won’t save a flawed bill that gives away the store.
4-I’m sure they will be happy to commit political suicide, too
5- How about a bill that isn’t a transparent taxpayer rip-off.
It’s a bit funny that all the democrats on abc screaming against the bailout last week now seem to desperately want it now that the republicans killed it.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 29, 2008, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Susan:
As others have stated $85 billion divided by $200 million is $425 not $425,000. This is the kind of logic that got us into this mess. It really scares me that this error wasn’t immediately obvious to you and the attributed author T. J. Birkenmeier. Was your post meant as a joke? If not It really explains the recent presidential polls.

Posted by: Nicole | September 29, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

– Was your post meant as a joke? If not It really explains the recent presidential polls. –
Absolutely Nicole.. My wife received one of those e-mails at work and passed it along to me.. I took one look, and said, that would be great, but the math is wrong and with the price of gas, I doubt we could take much of a vacation on $425!
Some people will just believe whatever they read.. look at the McCain supporters!

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

We put to much faith in politicans (man) to see us through. I suggest we should be putting our faith in Jehovah who have the final say so in everything we do. We need to put all faith in Jehovah!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | September 29, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm

From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/great-moments-in-american-history.html
Monday, September 29, 2008
Great Moments in American History
The Signing of the Declaration of Independence:
House Republicans: “We were going to sign. We were. We had dipped our quills in the very ink. However, it was then that John Witherspoon made a rude noise, directed at our very standing area. Therefore, we refused to sign.”
The Gettysburg Address:
Lincoln: “Four score and seven years ago…Why are you looking at me like that? No, I mean like that. Don’t look at me like that. I refuse to continue.”
D-Day:
General Eisenhower: “Men…off the carrier and to the shore! No…No…I said it nicely. I was just trying to be enthusiastic. No, I didn’t mean that you wouldn’t get off the carrier. No, that’s the usual tone of my voice.
Man’s Landing on The Moon:
Neil Armstrong: “That’s one small step for man, one giant…What, Buzz? No, I’m not trying to imply anything. No, I’ve never even thought about that. Yes, we all have the same size suits. No. Size 9. Yes, double E.”
The Stabilization of the American Economy in the 21st Century:
“You hurt our feelings.”
From:
Head of State
http://headofstate.blogspot.com/2008/09/great-moments-in-american-history.html

Posted by: Cara Prado | September 29, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Here is my alternative.
Let wall st collapse. The government can guarantee 401ks and other moneymarket accounts .
The government can lend small banks money so that everyone can meet payroll and still get loans.
At some point the american public is going to get sick of this and simply demand it be over. Depression or no depression.
At some point, people would rather be in a depression and know where they stand rather than sit there waiting for the depression to happen.

Posted by: infoseeking | September 29, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm

I find it funny that the vast majority of Americans do not want to see this ‘bailout’, Congress is doing their best to push it through. The sky is not falling. Banks are still lending. Homes are still selling, mortgages are being given out.
The crisis seems to be in Washington, and it’s not the working Americans they are trying to bail out, but the big contribution spenders and lobby money and those who were irresponsible in the first place.
In the end, it will be the taxpayers who get hurt, particularly the ones who were responsible with their money and had nothing to do with the current crisis.

Posted by: Concerned American | September 29, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

I want to see the CEO’s of these companies, the ones we taxpayers are being forced — I mean, asked — to save from themselves, on national TV, admitting they were greedy and wrong, pleading forgiveness, and thanking us “average” folk for saving their hineys. Think $700 billion is worth showing some humility? Courage, America. Stand firm. Don’t be bullied by these people. We will find a way.

Posted by: Jen | September 29, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Liberal democrats are playing political partisanship for their hunger for power, blaming Republicans for Democrats incompetence in leadership. When McCain proposed regulation of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae 3 years ago Democrats vehemently opposed it now Liberal Nancy Pelosi blames Republicans?! Democrats are spinning this and hoping on the naiveté of the American people.

Posted by: 2nfer | September 29, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

I was a republican until today. You republicans are going to destroy this country.
You are worse than traitors.

Posted by: Andrew Holly | September 29, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

The democrats screwed us all with the Freddie and Fannie and pushing for weakened lending practices so minorities and others like spectualators could buy homes despite bad credit.

Posted by: chattyway | September 29, 2008, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

I think the plan is necessary to revive the economics even though I am not fan of it. I just don’t want to see the market got crashed and my savings will be all gone.
I think those people who contribute the problem should get punished.
The plan was not perfect. There were lot of loophole in it. But I think if it got passed, the congress can negotiate the details later. The priority is to stablize the market.
And I think those who voted no in the house should be replaced. Most of them vote no because they are afraid of losing their jobs, they really did not put the whole country first.
The politics in DC is so polluted!!!!

Posted by: misty | September 29, 2008, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

I buy the doom and gloom to a certain point………….but dont think the bail out is the answer and still thinks it has to many stupid add ons.

Posted by: chattyway | September 29, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

mccain and his croonies, keating and graham, have been involved in both the saving and loan scandal and the current economic meltdown. now he would like to play the maverick who had nothing to do with it, when americans were complaining about the cureent economic mess, graham called them whiners and mccain said the economy was basically sound. wake up america these men and their policies caused this mess

Posted by: marty | September 29, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

The first thing any new bill should say……………….is not government support or pushing for subprime loans. In order to get a loan, you will actually have to have a decent credit score and probably some money to put down.

Posted by: chattyway | September 29, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

The DOW DIPPED TO 777 PTS. I know alot of people who lost a bundle today and they are not mad at 12 republicans or 94 democrats who voted “NO”. The want to ring Nancy Pelosi’s neck. She couldn’t shut her mouth for 5 more minutes. What a disgrace!

Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

to hide the fact of his involvement in both the saving and loan scandal and the current economic mess mccain talks about benchmarks when his actions in both of these mess have cause the usa almost a trillion dollars.
wake up america his talk about benchmarks is a smoke screen.

Posted by: marty | September 29, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

As an Obama supporter I am so upset and dissapointed today!
I agreed with Obama not working on the bailout deal but how dare he campaigns today and don’t do anything!
american markets lost 1 trillion today, The world markets as well.
senator McCain tried to help the situation , even increased his party members to vote for the bill from 5 to 60.
But Obama did NOTHING today!
Senator Obama should have been in Washington to vote and bring his party to get to pass the bailout bill today!
I am questioning Obama’s leadership!
a presidential candidate to be should be at his job for the American people’s future.
mr obama you are NOT getting my vote anymore!
I will vote for Nader/Gonzales!

Posted by: Jim | September 29, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

No one wants the bailout. Lord knows those bozos don’t deserve it after running those companies into the ground. But without it, there “will” be doom and gloom. If there is no money available for businesses to get credit, many will be forced to close, there go millions of jobs. Banks are already experiencing problems. Forget getting a loan to buy a new or used car. The government does not have the money to provide millions of people with unemployment checks. Welfare would go out the window too. It could get real bad.

Posted by: Brenda | September 29, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

If the democrats want the bailout than they should pass tgeir own!
Republicans should never vote for a crap bailout!

Posted by: shan | September 29, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

“Country First” isn’t this the current GOP slogan – right? Well, if that were true then – how do the Republican’s explain that the bail out rejection vote they led in rebellion is a good thing for this country when the headline financial news today reads: “The final stock carnage [today] far surpassed the 684-point drop on the first trading day after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.”
I’m renouncing my life-long membership to the GOP party for their arrogance and failure to broker an agreement when so much of our country’s [financial] reputation as the leader of the free [market] world is at stake. Free-market ideology is what has blinded them to the need to vote ‘yes’ for the bailout; despite compelling recommendations to the contrary from acknowledged financial experts.
Also, Pelosi’s speech is not an excuse for my home party to act so stupidly. GOP party leaders like Rep. Ginny Browne-Wait, R-Fl should be put up for immediate recall for their antics today and statements made today concerning the bailout vote: “We have a gun to our head,” said Rep. Ginny Brown-Waite, R-Fla., who opposed the bill. “This isn’t legislation — it’s extortion.”
Apparently, any Republican today who voted ‘no’ for the bailout bill has not a care in the world for their retirement savings, their financial security or that of ‘main street’ nor a concern for the financial reputation of the USA in the global market sense.
Watch what happens next – their actions will have caused a global melt-down in the global financial markets immediately following their stupid decisions today.
Net, net – I’m gone from the GOP party – permanently!

Posted by: Chuck | September 29, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

Nancy Pelosi is a failed Speaker. Can you imagine what Lyndon Johnson would have done in a similar situation? We don’t have to imagine it, we can look at history. Pelosi should be replaced as Speaker immediately.

Posted by: GroversCorners | September 29, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

By the end of the day the corrupt media will surely blame John Mc Cain for the fact 96 democratic house members voted NO for this bill.
My question is this. Why bother even have elections if the media is hell bent on rigging the outcome anyway ?
————————-
Are you for the bill? What are you ranting about? If McCain wants to help pass the bill perhaps it would be good if he had a bit of leverage in his own party. A lot more republicans voted No then democrats.

Posted by: runningeasy | September 29, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

My Bailout problems:
1. An unelected fed “czar” investing taxpayers money of almost a trillion $.
2. His job is to contain inflation #1. I hate that it changed to proping up markets.
3. No rushing. We rushed into Iraq, the Patriot Act…
4. Why present this bailout two weeks b4 congress goes home?
5. The bailout does not ‘solve’ anything.
6. The market is resilient, let it sort itself out without goverment insurance.
7. Fear is the motivation.
others???

Posted by: James Bogdanoff | September 29, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

How about option #5? Stay the hell out of it. You have screwed it up enough already. Let the market work for heavens sake instead of hobbling it with all of your fiscal idiocy. Giving you people money is like giving crack to an addict.

Posted by: aa | September 29, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

The reason most representatives voted no was the overwhelming negative responce from the public. The outcome of this mess is complicated and some times the general public doen’t have a clue. They know that this mess shouldn’t have happened and their right. But not approving the bailout for this reason would be the same as having an atomic bomb ready to go off and you won’t turn it off because your mad because someone turned it on. I have one thing to say to the law makers.. remember that your first duty is to your country… even if your constituants don’t agree.

Posted by: Mike S | September 29, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Jim: “I agreed with Obama not working on the bailout deal but how dare he campaigns today and don’t do anything!”
Don’t be stupid. What else could he have done? Stormed capital hill with his press pool in tow like McCain? The Senate is onboard with the bailout. The Democrats got a large majority of their team on board. The majority of Republicans were not on board. Do you think Obama would hold more sway with House Republicans than McCain and Bush?

Posted by: jhw539 | September 29, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

This bill stinks. But without it the economy falls into the brink. GOP policies brought us to the edge of an economic precipice and now the GOP members are blocking the reluctant Dems from throwing a rescue line to a teetering economy. The American public should be angry as hell and kick out every last one of these scoundrel BushGOPers.

Posted by: hopesprings52 | September 29, 2008, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

…don’t give a crap about my 401K, it’s been losing ever since Bush took office and I’d lose it ALL just to have the satisfaction of these Rich SOBs losing something.
Hit em where it hurts. NO BAILOUT. Call your Representatives and let them clearly understand your position.
NO BAILOUT FOR RICH WALL STREET SOBs.

Posted by: Russ | September 29, 2008, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Obama = Pelosi’s “puppet”
What an idiot!

Posted by: Pelosi's Puppet | September 29, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Quoting Carol:
” President Bush inherited a mess left over from Bill Clinton, who was a colossal disgrace to our presidency. His administration reaped the benefits of President Ronald Reagan’s efforts. As for the war, are you idiots not remembering the attack on September 11th?!? It was unprovoked and the retaliation was UNANIMOUSLY voted YES!!!And don’t forget–President Bush has been fighting a liberal Democratic Congress at every turn. ”

It’s hard to know where to begin. Dear, are you suggesting that the benefits of Reagan skipped four years? You DO realize there was a president, and a recession, between Reagan and Clinton, right???
Second, the “attacks of 9/11″ had nothing to do with Iraq. Um … you DO realize that those attacks were perpetrated by mostly Saudi nationals, who had no ties to Iraq, right? And as for the “retaliation” being “unanimous” — that may be at least close to being true regarding Afghanistan, but the 2002 Joint Resolution authorizing force against Iraq passed 77-23 in the Senate and 296-133-3 in the House — hardly unanimous.
I swear, the more I read the ravings of rank and file Republicans, the more I wonder whether they’re just dumb or willfully ignorant. It’s kind of depressing.

Posted by: ReidBlog | September 30, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Although the House GOP did its part to create this mess Pelosi is responsible for NOT delivering her side:
95 Dems voted against it; 140 for it. That is 40% of House Dems voted against it and that includes
many Pelosi’s own CA fellow Dems.
Losing 95 votes is the height of incompetence:
PELOSI MUST RESIGN.

Posted by: Nod | September 30, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

I am an owner of a small company of just 4 employees who lives off of just $50,000 per year. I have saved enough revenue for my business to last for the next two months. As of today, 80% of my customers are 90 days behind. As a sub-contractor, this economy has adversely affected my ability to provide for my family and my employees. Could I have done more with less employees, yes. Could I have charged more to my customers, yes. Perhaps I’ll have to adjust but, don’t think that this financial crisis doesn’t affect main street because it does. The conservative republican’s had since friday to influence the bill so that it would get passed. This failure of NOT passing the bill belongs to the House Republicans. Since my Congressmen voted for the bill, I am left waiting. If nothing changes, I will let employees go and they can file for unemployment, we can pay for that instead of a bailout and hopefully they’ll get another job. If we do nothing the market will correct itself but, I wonder if we really understand just what that means.

Posted by: Disgusted | September 30, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Don’t any of you use your brain? President Bush inherited a mess left over from Bill Clinton, who was a colossal disgrace to our presidency. His administration reaped the benefits of President Ronald Reagan’s efforts. As for the war, are you idiots not remembering the attack on September 11th?!? It was unprovoked and the retaliation was UNANIMOUSLY voted YES!!!And don’t forget–President Bush has been fighting a liberal Democratic Congress at every turn.
Posted by: Carol |
======================
OMG! I can’t believe this! Reagan’s trickle-down economic policies and deregulation is what led to this. Deficits soar and corruption is rampant under these policies. Clinton was morally repugnant, but his administration started to recover from the Reagan out-of-control spend and led to the largest economic expansion in the history of the country. Look at the national debt over time: http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html. These were ALL republican administrations. I prefer conservative values, but trickle-down must go, and Reagan needs to be taken off the pedestal that the republican party has placed him on.

Posted by: runningeasy | September 30, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

The fundamentals of the McCain campaign are strong.

Posted by: Fred | September 30, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

If McCain wants to help pass the bill perhaps it would be good if he had a bit of leverage in his own party. A lot more republicans voted No then democrats.
Posted by: runningeasy | Sep 29, 2008 11:51:36 PM
McCain did fight for the bill. He reached across the aisle and did everything he could. The bill would have passed, if Pelosi had not shown her a$$ and started cutting down Republicans in her speech today. And then there is her “puppet boy” who is hanging onto her skirt tale sucking up to everything Pelosi wants him to do. The bailout, is to be blamed on Pelosi. John McCain did the right thing….he is the TRUE leader America wants. Obama, needs to go back to Chicago and Rezko.

Posted by: Pelosi's Puppet | September 30, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Has anyone thought, even remotely, how the counrty intends to pay for this ? Taxing the rich isn’t enough.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 30, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

It is absolutely ludicrous that Pelosi can be blamed for the lack of passage of this bill. Talk about not taking responsibility for one’s actions. It is disgusting. I do not buy it. Congressmen are responsible for their own votes…that is the way of the world for grown-up people!

Posted by: Two-cats | September 30, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

I’ve dealt with my share of adrenaline-infused panic at work over the years. It’s nice to see congress really working and earning their money for a change.

Posted by: Rod M | September 30, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It is absolutely ludicrous that Pelosi can be blamed for the lack of passage of this bill. Talk about not taking responsibility for one’s actions. It is disgusting. I do not buy it. Congressmen are responsible for their own votes…that is the way of the world for grown-up people!
Posted by: Two-cats | Sep 30, 2008 12:13:15 AM
—————————————–
No, it’s true. It was Pelosi’s fault today. She was totally uncoordinated and her shoes didn’t match anything! Her hair was OK, but nothing “Ta Da”. What do you expect? Republicans need a stiff martini and a babe to look at before they muster up some courage.

Posted by: KIRIN | September 30, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

This whole bailout starts from GREED…from the top of Wall Street, south to Washington D.C. and all throughout America where greedy real estate agents sold bad mortgages to greedy people who couldn’t afford the mortgages and thought they could get something for nothing.
Let’s all take responsibility and blaming everyone.
We need to clean up wall street, clean up Washington, and teach Americans that the only way to prosperity is through hard work. No more free lunch!
McCain Palin 08

Posted by: Debbie12345 | September 30, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I have a fifth option – if Congress would take a year off, cease spending and tampering with the markets then you’d see the stock market sky rocket. I have an easy solution, the Republicans agree to the bailout, but with a golden receptacle that lets McCain pull the plug on this zombie if we have been sold a bill of goods. Bush sold us a bill of goods once before, I would not put it past him to try again.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | September 30, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Time for a new National Anthem ? How about AC/DC’s Highway to Hell ?

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 30, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

Not one dime to bailout the crooks!
I will withdraw all my bank funds and keep until the banking mess is finally resolved.
The idea of the democrats taking my hard-earned money and giving to their supporters in the mortgage and banking industry is disgusting. Now, Obama wants to raise my taxes, no way!
No way, no how, NObama, not now, not ever!

Posted by: abe | September 30, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Even as a Democrat but an American first, I find it despicable that Nancy Pelosi would flame passion and derail and sabotage the vote – just to advance the political prospects of Senator Obama.
Enough is enough for me with the Democratic party- I still will not support the Republicans – but will vote for John McCain this fall. I was leaning- Nancy Pelosi pushed me over.
Posted by: American Voter | Sep 29, 2008 10:06:32 PM
__________________________________________
OH PUHLEEEEZE!
As if you were EVER a Democrat. It’s hysterical that Republicans can’t even grasp the basic tenets of why Democrats are Democrats and then dress up in “drag” and pretend they are “converting”
The only thing you were hoping Pelosi would do is “push you over” and work you up with a strap-on. and a reach-around.

Posted by: Devin | September 30, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Congress needs to go back to drawing board and come up with a totally different idea. One that does not involve buying the garbage from wall street.

Posted by: Bob | September 30, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Umm, no Ron, it won’t correct itself and it will affect you. You have people like Suze Ormann going on TV to try to explain to brilliant people like yourself just how exactly its going to affect you.
Have any unused credit on your credit card limit you were planning to use? Well plan differently. One of the first things banks will do is start taking that away. All businesses rely on credit to operate. Their lines of credit have been suspended, so many small and medium sized businesses won’t make payroll.
Now maybe you don’t want to listen to Bush (who is admittedly a moron) but Bernanke is a knowledgeable guy and an expert in market crashes, and he says all this will come to pass if something isn’t done. And its not clear to me that Suze Ormann has a horse in this race, and she says this is what will happen if something isn’t done.
For those who object to the cost, your tax dollars are already being used to cover the accounts at banks that fail (remember the FDIC) and US investors lost $1 trillion just today–more than the cost of the bailout. And there will be more losses later in the week.
For those who think “it won’t affect me so I don’t want my tax dollars used” well if the losses today aren’t enough to sway you, wait a couple of weeks, and you might lose your job. Or maybe only wait until the end of the week when you can’t buy groceries or get gas because your credit card will be declined. You’ll think again. Let’s just hope its not too late at that point.

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 30, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am

What happens to people’s savings if the bill don’t pass. This article makes it sound like they didn’t mention it at all.

Posted by: Hemi | September 30, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

No bailout for Fannie and Freddie. Remember, Enron, same problem, different time. Send the crooks to jail and fine them for the billions they took. Obama, Dodd and the democrats should pay for the mess they let happen.
Next time listen to McCain, he warned the nation about this pending situation in 2005.
McCain/Palin – Country First !!!

Posted by: Angie in Jacksonville | September 30, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

This issue is another reason why it’s obvious that the right vote in Nov is
Dems for Congress
McCain for President
Can you imagine what this bill might have looked like if either party had control of all three Houses?
Divided government is the only way to keep both sides honest, and that’s still a maybe.

Posted by: BiPartisan | September 30, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

What happens to people’s savings if the bill don’t pass. This article makes it sound like they didn’t mention it at all.
Posted by: Hemi | Sep 30, 2008 12:31:36 AM
___
Hemi, your savings are FDIC insured. This is about the government “buying” all the bad loans made to the public that the public has or will default on. Your savings are safe…up to $100,000

Posted by: I | September 30, 2008, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Hemi,
If your savings are in an FDIC insured account, they are guaranteed by taxpayer dollers, so you will get your money, but it will come from the taxpayers (which is why people are idiots if they think that it won’t cost them any tax dollars as long as there is no bailout–it has already cost quite a bit and the more the banks fail or are seized, the more it costs).
The issue is not savings accounts, the issue is credit. Our entire economy runs on credit. Your employer uses credit to meet operating expensese (including paying you). You probably use credit to pay for gas and groceries.
As a result of all the instability, banks are refusing to loan money to other banks or to anyone. The credit is all gone. Businesses can’t get it. People wanting to buy homes can’t get it and very very soon, the only people with credit cards who will be able to use them is people who pay their balance in full every month.
So don’t worry about whether your savings will be safe, worry about whether you have enough savings to cover your expenses when your credit dries up.

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 30, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

This bill is fundamentaly a bad deal for the taxpayers. Thanks goodness that democrats and republicans stood their ground and killed it. It’s the Wall st. version of Iraq WMD’s. Why are the democrats now so in love with it ? Oh, I get it, they automatically love it now because the repubicans voted against it. They hated bailouts last week. They love them now.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 30, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

The republicans should come with a totally free market plan to replace
the socialist boondoggle just voted down. In the mean time president Bush
should fire Paulson & issue presidential
decrees to change some of the foolish
accounting rules hampering banks such
as mark to market.

Posted by: paulejb | September 30, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

McCain and his campaign are a team of the most prolific liars in modern political history… and it appears they are spinning out of control!!!!!!!!!!!!
McCain is not the one lying,McCain inroduced legislation in 2005 to prevent this crisis from happening..the Federal Housing Enterprises Regulatory Act of 2005 which would have prevented this crisis…and while he was trying to help the dems had their hands in the cookie jar and so the bill never made it out of committee.. McCain wants to bring jobs to american…How can he do that if we have a capital gains tx 30%-35% then other countries? where are the jobs going to go? Until we become competitive with china who has a 0% capital gains tax we will never regain our good paying, hard working job…why should the business man lose $350,000 pon every million he makes when he can keep the whole million in china…this is why mccain wants to cut capital gains tax…to keep your job here…and to bring other jobs her…You see it’s not a tax cut for the rich it’s an incentive for the rich to built in America

Posted by: tiggerward | September 30, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

No Uncle Moe, the Democrats merely understand how the economy works. I am not sure you do. You are one of these people who seem to think that this whole mess isn’t already costing. Every account at every bank that fails is funded by taxpayers. That doesn’t even take into account the huge losses people took on their retirement accounts today, or the job losses.
The WMDs did not exist, (I knew that all along). The credit crisis does exist. The signs of it are already out there. In a couple of weeks, it will be apparent even to you that opposing a bailout is a stupid idea.

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 30, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

When people lose the confident, it’s game over for Wall Street and then Main Street. I converted all my investment including my sons’ 529 fund last Friday after bought 2500 shares of WaMu on Thursday and lost almost $6000 on that Thursday night when the FDIC seized the Bank and sold to JPMorgan 1.9 Billions and investors got nothing from the deal.
Would you like to invest anymore especially Bank Stocks? For sure, I won’t. I would rather gamble in Las Vega, at least I can enjoy and have some free drink.

Posted by: stock_craft | September 30, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Tiggerwhatever,
Where to begin? Capital gains in the US are taxed at 15%. How can they be 35% to 40% higher than in other countries? Are they taxed at negative %20 elsewhere?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_gains_tax#United_States
The rest of what you said is equally loony tunes. McCain did nothing. He was still pushing deregulation and singing the praises of our deregulated financial system in early September 2008 (check You Tube).

Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 30, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

People, get a grip. Does it suck, yes! However, you are the one that will pay and pay hard either way. It’s the way it is and the American people are partially to blame. They didn’t mind the abuse on Wall Street and in the banking industries as long as they were getting sweet (unreasonable) deals on loans (mortgages, cars, credit cards). Everyone has been spending money they don’t have and now it’s all tumbling down. You wont be able to get a car loan and your credit cards will be shut down. No school loans for your kids. Your company won’t be able to get the loans that keep many companies a float during harder times (which are coming) so people will loose their jobs. Since you don’t believe in bailouts I suppose you won’t be collecting unemployment insurance. What is left of your 401K after the market finishes melting down will be used to survive on, never mind what you are going to do when you get old. And people already retired are totally screwed. They will have to go on welfare as they loose their pensions and 401k investments, which will cause taxes to go up even though no one has any money.
Grow up. It sucks that we got here and people should pay, but we are here and it needs to be fixed.

Posted by: Kathy | September 30, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

No bailout for Fannie and Freddie. Remember, Enron, same problem, different time. Send the crooks to jail and fine them for the billions they took. Obama, Dodd and the democrats should pay for the mess they let happen.
Next time listen to McCain, he warned the nation about this pending situation in 2005.
McCain/Palin – Country First !!!
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Didn’t the Republicans have control in 2005. Pelosi couldn’t even pass a bill to stop the speculation in oil trading two months ago, so how did the Dems block McCain in 2005 when the Republicans were twice as strong as they are now. Maybe I’m missing something.

Posted by: Hemi | September 30, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

Why would someone like Stephanopoulos keep defending Obama when Obama was taking a lot of money from ACorn . He was helping cause this problem now the rest of us have to pay for it. How much money is Stephanopoulos getting from these people to keep saying how great Obama is?

Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

What a lot of you Americans fail to understand is that this bill is not a bailout package for the people on Wall Street. It is there to help keep the American public in their homes, available credit for small business so they can pay their employess. Some people are yelling not to accept this bill but they fail to understand they are cutting their own throats when their jobs no longer can pay them because the company they work for doesn’t have the credit. Or someone who needs money to repair their home, car or health care issue can no longer get that loans because the banks will not issue any. Think people and support this bill before your country goes to hell and brings everyone in the USA down with them.The republicans are peeved and don’t care what happens now because they all know they are finished come Nov 4 and they will screw this country up as much as they can because of it.They don’t care what happens to Americans and this is punishment for not supporting their party. Now all you people who voted for Bush the last 8 years now know what kind of people the republicans are. And yet you still support the Liar and his Barbie doll. Americans sure are stupid sometimes. You all want to hope they can put somehing together because if not, people will lose more than their investments. They will lose their jobs, homes and all the banks will cease giving credit to anyone. Credit cards will cease to function and no credit will be avaiable anywhere.Try living in a society where you can even borrow 1000 dollars when you need it. Good luck with that.

Posted by: John S | September 30, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

You guys ripped of the fivethirtyeight website’s comments.

Posted by: skaaght | September 30, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

It may take a revolution to break the choke-hold that the liberals and the liberal press has over this country – from suppression of free speech by the Obama campaign, to outright manipulation by the press to force Obama into power as a one-party dictatorship.
Now is as good a time as any.

Posted by: One_American | September 30, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

The Banks of the United States have reported 7 Trillion Dollars in bad mortgage debt. Let me ask all you geniuses out there what good is it going to do to have the tax payers buy 700 Billion Dollars of this 7 Trillion Dollar debt? Who knows how much more debt the banks and financial institutions have not been reported. Spending this 700 Billion Dollars on this debt is like throwing kerosene, dynamite and gasoline on a wild fire storm. It only makes the fire hotter and more dangerous and destroys those who fueled the fire just like giving the extremely rich this 700 billion dollars. The tax payers debt, the national debt will just go up and prolong the tax payers suffering, starving, and wreak havoc on their physical, mental and financial health.

Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

The Banks of the United States have reported 7 Trillion Dollars in bad mortgage debt. Let me ask all you geniuses out there what good is it going to do to have the tax payers buy 700 Billion Dollars of this 7 Trillion Dollar debt? Who knows how much more debt the banks and financial institutions have not been reported. Spending this 700 Billion Dollars on this debt is like throwing kerosene, dynamite and gasoline on a wild fire storm. It only makes the fire hotter and more dangerous and destroys those who fueled the fire just like giving the extremely rich this 700 billion dollars. The tax payers debt, the national debt will just go up and prolong the tax payers suffering, starving, and wreak havoc on their physical, mental and financial health.

Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

The Banks of the United S Our House of Representatives listened to over 200 of America’s top economists and smart people of this country. They did what was right not what was fast and convenient and prosperous to the very rich. The fact that the House of Representatives rejected the bail out is awesome! Here is why. The bill was a just a band-aid that still benefitted the very rich and not the people. It was not a solution to the cause of the problem. This bill would only have postponed the inevitable to just after the next President is sworn in on Jan. 29, 2009. There are real solutions to the cause of the problems of the credit crises not even considered in this terrible fast paced 700 Billion dollar extortion bail out bill for the extremely rich people of this country and around the world.
In January 2009 the 7 trillion dollars in bad mortgage loans that the banks have reported will still be unpaid. Who knows how many trillion dollars of bad mortgage debt have not been reported by the banks. 700 billion dollars won’t even come close to paying for all of this debt. Financial melt down is inevitable. Let it happen now so true recovery can begin. Bush and his Cronies did their best to ram this 700 billion dollar pay off to the rich for making this mess down our throats.
Here is some interesting info. Bush and Chaney have recently purchased homes in foreign counties to for a speedy get away to live in after their terms are over in Jan. 2009. They didn’t want this economy to blow up on them while they were still in office. They didn’t want the blame for their very real immoral, unethical and most likely illegal actions. Yeah they got both.
One last fleecing of the American people was halted by our smart members of the House of Representatives who listened to the people and over 200 of America’s top economists. We can truly thank them for listening to us.
It’s time for millions of people to march on Washington DC peacefully in protest. The puppets of congress of the extremely rich are going attempt to pass this fraudulent bill again. “The only thing to fear is fear itself.” (President Franklin D. Roosevelt Democrat) Make the members of the House of Representatives and the members of the Senate know they were hired by all of us who voted for them not just a few very rich people. Make them know we are their bosses not a few rich families. We the People: Demand REAL SOLUTIONS FOR ALL PEOPLE not for just a very few extremely rich people!

Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 1:18 am 1:18 am

The Banks of the United S Our House of Representatives listened to over 200 of America’s top economists and smart people of this country. They did what was right not what was fast and convenient and prosperous to the very rich. The fact that the House of Representatives rejected the bail out is awesome! Here is why. The bill was a just a band-aid that still benefitted the very rich and not the people. It was not a solution to the cause of the problem. This bill would only have postponed the inevitable to just after the next President is sworn in on Jan. 29, 2009. There are real solutions to the cause of the problems of the credit crises not even considered in this terrible fast paced 700 Billion dollar extortion bail out bill for the extremely rich people of this country and around the world.
In January 2009 the 7 trillion dollars in bad mortgage loans that the banks have reported will still be unpaid. Who knows how many trillion dollars of bad mortgage debt have not been reported by the banks. 700 billion dollars won’t even come close to paying for all of this debt. Financial melt down is inevitable. Let it happen now so true recovery can begin. Bush and his Cronies did their best to ram this 700 billion dollar pay off to the rich for making this mess down our throats.
Here is some interesting info. Bush and Chaney have recently purchased homes in foreign counties to for a speedy get away to live in after their terms are over in Jan. 2009. They didn’t want this economy to blow up on them while they were still in office. They didn’t want the blame for their very real immoral, unethical and most likely illegal actions. Yeah they got both.
One last fleecing of the American people was halted by our smart members of the House of Representatives who listened to the people and over 200 of America’s top economists. We can truly thank them for listening to us.
It’s time for millions of people to march on Washington DC peacefully in protest. The puppets of congress of the extremely rich are going attempt to pass this fraudulent bill again. “The only thing to fear is fear itself.” (President Franklin D. Roosevelt Democrat) Make the members of the House of Representatives and the members of the Senate know they were hired by all of us who voted for them not just a few very rich people. Make them know we are their bosses not a few rich families. We the People: Demand REAL SOLUTIONS FOR ALL PEOPLE not for just a very few extremely rich people!

Posted by: Bob4USA | September 30, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

The Republocrats platform: More taxes…..Mores war.…More imported products.…More government.….More money for the military-industrial complex….More money for the banks….More money for Wall Street….More money to run worthless government programs.…More lies about the War in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world….More money for a worthless medical care program….More Socialism….Less jobs for Americans…and then a repeat of everything over and over again plus more of everything to delude the American people into complacency. The Republocrats platform: More taxes…..Mores war.…More imported products.…More government.….More money for the military-industrial complex….More money for the banks….More money for Wall Street….More money to run worthless government programs.…More lies about the War in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world….More money for a worthless medical care program….More Socialism….Less jobs for Americans…and then a repeat of everything over and over again plus more of everything to delude the American people into complacency. Republicans….Democrats….one in the same that will never change.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

“If Pelosi and the Democratic/chicago machine want to take over the government and business and industry they will have to work at it, and not have it handed to them.”
________________________________________
This statement proves just how f’n stupid some Americans are. The Democrats had control of Congress for 40 years. DOn’t you think if they wanted to take over they would have had it done? What kind of a fool writes the above quoted garbage and believes it?
Folks, do yourselves and all of us a favor……… go to the polls on Nov 4th and make your choice for President. AFter that be sure to vote against any other incumbent elected servant on all levels (from the dog catcher to the Senator in Washington). Send a message with your vote the the American citizen is taking back it’s country and remove all of these idiots ASAP!!!

Posted by: dk | September 30, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Why would someone like Stephanopoulos keep defending Obama when Obama was taking a lot of money from ACorn . He was helping cause this problem now the rest of us have to pay for it. How much money is Stephanopoulos getting from these people to keep saying how great Obama is?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Show me where it says Obama was taking money. Maybe you can find some real proof like this. Tucker Bigmouth didn’t even have anything to say about it. Some things ya just can’t lie your way out of.
Obama unleashed a tough new TV ad that charged McCain had protected tax breaks for insurance companies that hide profits offshore.
Without mentioning dates or the companies involved, the commercial implies McCain went to the Atlantic Ocean island of Bermuda with corporate executives and, while there, “pledged to protect tax breaks for American corporations that hide their profits offshore. And grateful insurance company executives and their lobbyists who benefit from the tax scheme, gave McCain $50,000.”
There was no immediate response from the McCain campaign. The attack on the Arizona senator was the latest in a series of increasingly negative television spots by both sides in the historic and close contest for the White House.
_./’\._¸¸.•¤**¤•.¸.•¤**¤•..•¤. .
*•. .•* *Obama/Biden* o8!! Vote4 Change!!
/.•*•.\ •¤**¤•.,.•¤**¤•.,.•¤**¤

Posted by: Hemi | September 30, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Option 4 is the best one of all. Dems tried to work with the GOP, made all kinds of compromises for what everybody says is the greater good (well, everybody running the economy thinks we have a problem, Houston, anyway) now the Dems should just do their own plan based on Democratic Party values.
Fairness, strengthen the middle class, help small businesses and support the poor and the elderly, stick it to the rich who have created this mess with their greed, and as we see when times get tough, profound cowardice.

Posted by: Duckman GR | September 30, 2008, 1:24 am 1:24 am

There is only one party in control of Washington, the Republocrats. The Republocrats are still confused about the financial mess and the Republocrats do not know what to do. The Republocrats need leadership and that does not exist in Washington.
Here is the leadership Americans needs.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am

I cannot vote for Obama that brags of his church, a church violently opposed to American ways and Judaism. I cannot vote for Obama for the use of police tactics in Missouri by wanting to suspend the Freedom of Speech and the Freedom of the Press. I cannot vote for a liar.
I cannot vote for John McCain because no matter how he tries to distance himself from the GOP, he is still a Republican that will favor business and his constituency.
The Republicans and the Democrats NEVER look back on their past mistakes. They just continue on making the same old mistakes one right after the other.
Return to the values of the American way and stop the corruption in WASHINGTON, D.C.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

The Fed began raising the Fed Funds rate in the spring of 1928, and kept raising them through a recession that began in August 1929. This led to the stock market crash in October 1929.
When the stock market crashed, investors turned to the currency markets. At that time, dollars were backed by gold held by the U.S. Government. Speculators began selling dollars for gold in September 1931, which caused a run on the dollar.
The Fed raised interest rates again to try and preserve the value of the dollar. This further restricted the availability of money for businesses, causing more bankruptcies.
The Fed did not increase the supply of money to combat deflation.
As investors withdrew all their dollars from banks, the banks failed, causing more panic. The Fed ignored the banks’ plight, thus destroying any remaining consumers’ confidence in banks. Most people withdrew their cash and put it under the mattress, which further decreased the money supply.
History tends to repeat itself. Hang on America, because without this package deal, your all going for a ride you may not like. You people elected the same party for the last 8 years and 45% of Americans still want those people in office, even tho your economy is totally screwed because of them. You have idiots out there saying Obama and the Democrats are responsible for this when in fact its your own party who have been in power as President and the last 6 and a half years of the last 8 years have been in power in the Senate.Your own representative, who is running for office, was one of the actual people to blame for deregulation and yet you morons still want him in office. When are you people going to wake up and figure out this man don’t give a damn about you or your children. All they care about is themselves and their rich friends. You would think that picking Sarah Palin as his VP would give you a hint but no, you people are complete morons and can’t think for yourselves. Go ahead and vote for the same party that has screwed you and 95% of Americans for the last 8 years. Your lack of intelligence is the laughing stock of the world.Go for it. Put McCain in office and see if you have anything left after the next 4 years. You people are toast and don’t even know it.

Posted by: John S | September 30, 2008, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Obama, McCain, Biden or Palin ….. It does not matter which one you vote for in November. They all agree to expand the Middle East conflict at the cost of American lives and at the cost to American taxpayers. It is no different then when President Carter (term of Presidency 1977-1981) said the United States must control the Persian Gulf because it is the hub of oil. Washington had more than thirty years to correct the United States oil shortages problem that showed its ugly head during the Carter administration and did nothing.
The answer to the oil shortage is Republicans and Democrats sending American son to die for oil. . Moreover, know the truth that it is not just a 9/11 or otherworld problem. Americans kill their own sons for OIL. Send the message loud and clear, GET OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST. Vote for a President that says, GET OUT OF THE MIDDLE EAST and make them keep their PROMISE.
I am voting for a party that can keep a promise and a party that is against sending American troops anywhere in the world to fight United Nations problems.
My Vote is going here: Join us and free America from imperialism.
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am

Judge. Hahahahahahaha. You got to be kidding me right. Your a joke. Get a life.

Posted by: John S | September 30, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

The United States is like a sinking ship with a big hole in its side, Obama wants to give oars and McCain wants to give it more weight.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

DeeDee You need to do your homework.
McCain put forth a regulatory reform bill in 2005 which the Dems opposed out of concerns that the banking industry would quit giving home loans to those normally deprived of the American Dream.
Bill Clinton just recently said that was one of the biggest mistakes the Dems made and that they have to take responsiblity for. It is true, McCain is a supporter of deregulation BUT McCain has also shown in the last decade a willingness to go after big industries to get more oversight when he feels the consumers are being impacted or when he feels oversight is needed . This is one of the reasons during the primaries the major industries put more money in people like Romney and Guliani the McCain and one of the reasons that Obama has done better in contributions in all major industries, other then one, than McCain. McCain has shown he is more then willing to bite the hand that feeds him. He’s taken on the cable industry, tobacco industry, defense industry, auto industry, pharmaceutical industry, oil industry, he wrote the Patient’s Bill of Rights with both Edwards and Kennedy and so on.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 30, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

DeDe: I’m only opposed to to cash-for -trash plan we have now. Waren Buffet, Citibank, etc. are buying up the assests that have real value. This is a plan to stick the leftover trash on the taxpayers.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 30, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

John S….
You vote for Obama and you will not have a life. Better live where it is warm, so you can live on the beach. I hope the trees have bananas, coconuts and breadfruit.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

alpaig52, McCain may have put forward a regulatory reform bill in 2005, but since then has voted a number of times to keep deregulation. Look it up. He is just as guilty for what has happened. Get your facts straight.
Anyway folks, night all

Posted by: John S | September 30, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

The solution is clear in two parts, if there is indeed a federal bailout of private business. 1. every American wage earner should receive stock and/or options in each of these failing businesses commensurate with the amount they will be beholding to pay to gat these failures out of failure. 2. Every board of directors, ceo and direct controlling manager should be fired, their assets seized and auctioned, and the monies reinvested in their failing businesses (like any upstanding American small business owner would do). (A nominal stipend to allow then to resettle in a middle-american city in a condo, a gas efficent car, a map indicating where the state unemployment and retraining office as well as the local day labor shops and check cashing institutions and 2 months food stamps should suffice to get them back on their feet.) They have failed ethically and morally and need to be held accountable for their actions and American citizenry should have the opportunity to profit from their losses as opposed to the last 2 decades of economic rape and pillage that has occurred.

Posted by: val murphy | September 30, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

Judge Agreed. You’re talking about the Carter Doctrine and Petreaus if from US Central Command which evolved out of the Carter Doctrine and whose primary purpose is protecting or securing our foreign oil interests.
McCain at one townhall meeting said that this Country needs to once and for all get it’s foreign oil dependency under control and that he would prioritize such. McCain went on to say that we need to do this so we never, ever send any of our young men/women to fight a war over oil ever again. The next day the media was all over him and talking about the gaffe McCain made and how he said the Iraq War was about oil.
McCain pulled back and went back to the reason we’re in Iraq is about George W’s war on terror. You know, the same
George W’s war on terror that Obama also plans to keep waging. McCain
pulled back but he was telling the truth and he made no misstep when he made that comment. It’s the kind of comment you’d hear from the far left, we certainly haven’t heard such a comment from Obama.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 30, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am

i have a suggestion tar a feather the whole bunch and run them out of town. starting with paulson, reed, pelosi, and barney frank. they are incompetent/divisive and have proved they are incapable of fixing this mess.
and then seize the assets of all the crooks, speculators, and wallstreet fat cats and bailout the economy.

Posted by: colorado | September 30, 2008, 1:43 am 1:43 am

deregulation is a huge problem. They should be regulated. If banks can have this huge an impact on the economy, they need to be monitored and regulated very closely.
by the way, Im talking about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the DEMOCRATIC love child.

Posted by: infoseeking | September 30, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am

Hey Moron Judge. i’m not an American but I do my own research and I wish morons like you would do the same. The trash you keep spewing out is just that, garbage and doesn’t belong where intelligent people give informed opinions. I have nothing to gain or lose by saying what I know are facts. John McCain has no intentions of helping the average America. And if you believe otherwise you are all stupid. Just do the research and look at his record. The mans is incapable of honesty and will screw the American public even more so than Bush and that says a lot. You people need to wake up if you think he’s the person to get your country out of thsi mess. The man has a lower IQ than my 15 year old for God sake. Wake the hell up people. Your not all that stupid I hope. Geez

Posted by: John S | September 30, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Hey where is McSuperman? McCain needs to put his superman outfit back on, suspend his campaign again, yell ‘country first’ and help get this piece of legislation passed. Afterall, his campaign has bragged about how influential he has been in brokering a suposed bipartisan agreement that never happened. His staff bragged about McSameasBush being instrumental in getting the bailout bill passed before it has even been passed!! Now that is amazing. Wow, what a hero (not).

Posted by: MyHero | September 30, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

John I’m not letting McCain off the hook but I’m also not going to be an idiot and let the Dems off the hook either. This is a bi-partisan mess.
The deregulation of the banking industry under Clinton’s watch, the Community Reinvestment Act getting a boost at the same time we were deregulating the finance industry and a lack of consumer protections in the late 90′s all contributed. There is enough blame for both the Dems and Repubs to share.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 30, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

As far as the candidates are concerned, the difference, if you call it that, is we are all strapped the the oars of the sinking ship. McCain says, Row, you bastards ! Obama says “Row you wonderfull, lovable flunkies who didn’t get into Harvard !” It’s a distinction without a difference. Either way….

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 30, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

val murphy…
Stock in a company will prove worthless if the company goes chapter.
Republicans….Democrats….one in the same that will never change.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am

Hemi Why don’t you go onto the Center for Responsive Politics website and look at where Obama gets all of his money.

Posted by: alpaig52 | September 30, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

obama was acorns attorney remember?
acorn sued to get unqualified people into homes they could not afford it was called
the community reinvestment fund started by sweet mr carter/increased by clinton/ this mess has a dirty democratic history, and obamas fingerprints all over it that will not get swept away under the rug.

Posted by: colorado | September 30, 2008, 1:51 am 1:51 am

What’s next? LOL…Google this: “Community Reinvestment Act” (1995) The DEMOCRATS added massive new provisions that FORCED banks to issue 1 trillion in new “Subprime Loans” (or pay big penalties) Google this: In 2003 the Bush Administration recommended major overhauls in the Housing Finance Industry but the Democrats tried to stop it… Google this: 2005 John McCain Warned of Mortgage Collapse Co-sponsoring a Bill “The Housing Enterprise Regulatory Act” of 2005 http://www.govtrack.us. Bill S-190 but DEMOCRATS blocked it. It came back in 2007 but Fannie Mae had friends – (Dodd, Johnson, Rains, Obama, etc…) “Change you can believe in?” LOL.. Sweetheart Loan, Sweetheart Deals… … Google this: “Center For Responsive Politics” http://www.opensecrets.org Do we want those who were part of the problem to now be overseers in the solving of the problem? —Greg——http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2734923/

Posted by: GregbeingFrank | September 30, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

John S…
Please learn how to read my posts. I am a natural born American citizen that has served honorable in the US Army. It is the SOS with the Republocrats. I am not in support of the Democrats or the Republicans: the Republocrats.
Your research is as immature and worthless as Obama. He is a liar.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 1:54 am 1:54 am

wow this polosi woman before the vote all she talked about was how bad republicans were and it was all their fault now on this video its all bipartisonship and lets work together she not only turns on a dime she stops to pick it up it was like punching someone in the mouth then asking for a kiss talking about split personality

Posted by: david reyes | September 30, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

ACORN, Frankin Raines, Rezko and Obama. Don’t expect those exposes’ anytime soon from abc. Maybe after the election…

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 30, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Pelosi: The effect to too much Botox.

Posted by: Uncle Moe | September 30, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Okay, My last post for the night. I’m Canadian so I don’t have anything to lose or gain by giving my opinion. First, to all Republicans. Start packing. Your days are numbered. This race was over when LameBrain McCain picked the Alaskan Ice Queen for his VP. Even your own representatives are saying he is an idiot. If this is what being a Christian is about, lying to everyone in this country the way he has, then i’m no longer a Christian.Second. The American public, well the intelligent ones anyway, which is at least 65% of them, see right through this fools actions. This man has flipflopped all over the place and changed his logo so many times I am starting to think he’s out to lunch. Sorry, he is out to lunch. Americans want someone with intelligence and Obama has that. An IQ of 125 who was even asked to join the most intelligent group of people in the world. MENSA. Compare that to McCain who finished 894 out of a class of 899 and the Ice Queen who took 6 years and 5 colleges to finish her journalism degree. Now who would be better to get your country out of the mess its in now. It doesn’t take a scientist to figure that out people. Wake up before you tighten the noose around your necks a little more till you can’t breath no longer. WHat kind of future are you leaving your children and grand children. A country so far in debt, that they will be paying for your stupidity for at least 50 to 60 years. Nice legacy to leave your loved one. Real smart people.NOT

Posted by: John S | September 30, 2008, 2:03 am 2:03 am

the people won today, the votes opposing the bailout were motivated by the number of calls and emails to our representatives. we lit up the whitehouse switchboards and demanded accountability. i have student loans on the line but if i have to sacrifice that to get our representative democracy back i can wait to finish my degree. we must all be willing to make sacrifices-but most of all we must not allow the financial elites to hold us hostage and divide us. we must not support a bailout not until we get a bill that GURANTEES OUR money and relief for legitimate mortgage holders who are trying to make their payments. but no free lunch.

Posted by: colorado | September 30, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Ripped off from Colony14 Author
September 29th, 2008 at 7:32 pm
The cause, in a nutshell:
1. Congress (under Jimmy Carter) passes a bill making it illegal for banks to “redline” (that is, they can’t ignore poor neighborhoods because that would be discrimination).
2. In 1992, Clinton can’t get elected by saying “Vote for me and I’ll give $250,000 in tax dollars to all poor people so they can buy a house” so he instead says “I feel your pain” to get into office.
3. Clinton changes the rules so that banks are faced with $10,000 fines (or 1% of assets, whichever is less) per-loan-application if they discriminate against the poor. In other words, the government FORCES banks to make bad loans.
4. To soften the load, Clinton reduces the Fannie Mae “reserve requirement” to an astoundingly low 2.5%! (They need to keep only $2.50 in cash for every $100 loaned!) Banks, faced with $10,000 fines, respond by making bad loans and immediately dumping them on Fannie Mae.
5. Clinton rule changes also require banks to count WELFARE CHECKS AND FOOD STAMPS as “income” for loan applications!
6. Senate Democrats demand that Fannie Mae buy more bad loans to “help the poor become homeowners.”
7. Radicals Islamists attack the U.S. on 9/11. To keep the economy from tanking because of the terrorist attack, the Federal Reserve keeps interest rates artifically low – to stimulate the economy. These low interest rates make it even easier for people to get mortgages.
8. Because Fannie Mae is buying up bad loans like candy, banks keep making them.
9. Conservatives see the handwriting on the wall and start complaining.
10. Fannie Mae CEOs James Johnson and Franklin Raines “cook the books” to give themselves, and other former Clinton buddies at Fannie Mae, bigger bonuses.
11. Raines (like, Johnson, later an Obama advisor) is forced to resign and pay back millions.
12. Because many poor people entered the housing market, there are MORE buyers chasing the same number of houses available. That makes prices go up – much faster than the inflation rate. (Duh! If more people want the same house, the seller can charge more!)
13. More conservatives warn Congress of trouble ahead. Barney Frank (D-MA) and other Dems say “Don’t worry, be happy.” Maxine Waters (D-CA) says Republicans are racists for wanting to rein in Fannie Mae to prevent poor blacks from buying houses. Waters praises the crook Franklin Raines.
14. John McCain submits a Fannie Mae reform bill in 2005. Senator Chris Dodd (D-CN) gets his fellow Dems to promptly vote against it; it never leaves his banking committee and thus never gets voted on by the full Senate. Dodd gets a boatload of cash from Fannie Mae for his campaigns, more than any other Senator (Obama is in second place).
15. Everything explodes in 2008.
16. Secretary Paulson (a Democrat) persuades a non-functioning President Bush to go along with a bailout.
17. At a White House meeting, Dems feed their talking points to Obama so he can look good. He screws up, and lambasts the Republicans – angering them enough so that they have no desire to help.
18. Frank, Dodd, Reid, Pelosi blame the Republicans. The media piles on, ignoring the real cause of the crisis, in an effort to elect their socialist pal Obama. They all know the Dems caused the problems, but why burden Americans with the truth?
19. Conservatives in Congress say NO to socialism.
20. Americans say NO to socialism.
21. Democrats say THIS IS CRITICAL, WE MUST ACT! and then take a day off for a Jewish holiday. (Better to risk destroying the economy than lose Jewish votes in November 4.)
22. McCain – foolishly – supports the bailout, reprising his role as the “Democrat-lite” candidate.
23. Sarah Palin will hopefully expose the Dems for their part in the mess during her debate with Biden.
24. Americans are screwed, no matter what happens.
The full details at:
http://colony14.net/id46.html
TOTALLY accurate account and Nazi Pelosi knows it.

Posted by: zak | September 30, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Q: Who warned about this crisis in 2003?
A: Alan Greenspan
Q: Who proposed an oversight commitee and new regulations for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in 2003?
A: President Bush
Q: Who killed President Bush’s request to Congress in 2003?
A: Democrats
Q: Who warned of this crisis in 2005?
A: Alan Greenspan
Q: Who sponsered the 109th Congress Senate Bill 190 (S.190) in 2005? [This bill stipulated the need to reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It called for an oversight commitee and new regulations to limit risk in the housing market. It also warned of, exactly, what we are seeing today.]
A: Chuck Hagel (Sponser)
Elizabeth Dole (Co-sponser)
JOHN MCCAIN (Co-sponser)
John Sununu (Co-sponser)
Q: When Barak Obama said, “We should never have gotten here in the first place.” on 9/29/2008, who’s fault would it be that we are where we are?
A: Democrats
Q: Who was proposing new regulation of the housing market for the last 8 years?
A: Republicans
Q: Who was opposing the push for new regulation of the housing market for the last 8 years?
A: Democrats
It is unfortunate that alot of people in this country blame this crisis on Pres. Bush, the Republicans and/or capitalism as a whole when none of it has anything to do any of them.
Simply put if Mr. Obama does win in November we are all going to pay the price.
If you hate what I wrote, too bad, it is all fact, look it up and don’t hate the messenger. You may hate my point of view but we are all in the same boat which is taking on water right now and Mr. Obama’s tax plan will not only sink us faster but might sink us completely.

Posted by: CPLViper | September 30, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

I say Drop Obama, Bring Back Hillary.
I bet the market straightens out Just with that alone.

Posted by: seah | September 30, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

For anyone who plans to retire or who owns stock, understand this: George Bush and McCain and their economy philosophy and system have just lost you 7% of everything you invested today 770 points today not including the losses from last week. So again whatever you think about the other guy before you pull the poll for McCain just know that he and his people have messed up your money. Thats not a a red or blue issue this is a green is we are all losing money.

Posted by: jase | September 30, 2008, 2:13 am 2:13 am

thank you zac.

Posted by: colorado | September 30, 2008, 2:15 am 2:15 am

At the end of the day if more Republicans would have voted for the bill in which their leader the President wanted it would have passed. If Mc Cain had in fact got the Republican members acting in partisanship like he declared and they voted higher in percentage than the Democrats did for this bill it would have passed. Instead the Republicans even came out and admitted they stone walled it because of Pelosi hurting their feelings on calling out Bush for his failed economic plansas a reason we need the bailout in the first place.

Posted by: chris | September 30, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

Too bad jase was typing instead of reading … sorry, jase, you are putting the blame on the wrong men.

Posted by: CPLViper | September 30, 2008, 2:16 am 2:16 am

@Zak
You got it right.

Posted by: CPLViper | September 30, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

John S
Canada has many regulations to control the way people think. Canada will not allow products into the country that contain Vitamin K. Canada treats its people like all the people have an I.Q. of 100.
Stay home John S…Canada has its own problems.
Republicans….Democrats….one in the same that will never change.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

I love when non-Americans like John think they have the right to tell us who to vote for.

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 2:18 am 2:18 am

Sorbane Oxley is being blamed for alot of this mess—pacifically the mark to market part. Bush has the power to subspend this even before the markets open tomorrow. Why not try it?
Paulson motives and his ties to Goldman Sachs are in serious question—-fire paulson, put someone in without the motives. Let’s hear from other economists who probably much better ideals than Paulson.

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Sorbane Oxley is being blamed for alot of this mess—pacifically the mark to market part. Bush has the power to subspend this even before the markets open tomorrow. Why not try it?
Paulson motives and his ties to Goldman Sachs are in serious question—-fire paulson, put someone in without the motives. Let’s hear from other economists who probably much better ideals than Paulson.

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

Here’s a better idea about what to do with the $ 700 Billion.
Don not bailout the failed financial institutions, instead, provide the money as loans to the remaining solvent financial institutions charging them interest on the loans in accordance with how much measurable relief that they provide to the foreclosure crisis. In so doing, enable the financial institutions to rewrite mortgages extending either their term, or their rate of interest, or both as long as doing so turns them from being junk to being something viable. The idea being to reward these institutions on developing innovative, but workable, lending practices. The interest that the banks pay on their loans is payable to the taxpayers, since they are the source for the money. Money loaned to the banks that is not used in softening the foreclosure crisis make its way through the system for credit borrowing by businesses and individuals. In this way, no money is waisted trying to save banks that failed.

Posted by: John Locke | September 30, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

Any bailout plan is again the will of the 90% of American people. Will the White House and/or Congress have the guts to have a national referendum to decide the issue?

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

I just don’t buy that the nay Republicans and Dems in the house are that “principled”. I’d like to be proven wrong. They will probably tuck there tail between their legs and run for cover.
We’re headed for a consumer recession regardless, so NO BAILOUT!
It will be painful. Forget who’s going to be Pres next. Instead think of your future… Argentina.
Good luck.

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | September 30, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Zac and Colorado, Deregulation caused this crisis. You can try to blame this thing on Clinton but intelligent people know better. We had a crash after the Reagan years and now we are having another meltdown after the Bush years.

Posted by: Two-cats | September 30, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Kinda scary but necessary i feel.
I can’t afford another rescue pkg….congress tried to bully their way into my pockets by fear…again!!
The markets will rid themselves from greed and evil, then they can borrow my money. FBI will catch the gov officials and wall street execs involved. This money problem has been nurtured by corrption and greed for a long time. It didn’t happen in just the last eight years i’m affraid.
Who knew the minority would be the majority in this vote…. This was the worst deal.
Why in the hell would you buy bad credit with more credit?!?!?! quit borrowing credit and find a free market solution, low taxes and insurance money for security sounds fair.
This deal need to be reworked!!! Thank God!!
This is USA, not USSA!!!

Posted by: corbon | September 30, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

Sorbane-Oxley is being blamed for alot of the mess—-Bush has the pwoer to suspend this even before markets opens. Paulson ties to Golden Sachs are bringing his motives into question so he should step down. Why not try suspending Sorbane-Oxley?

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am

Here’s what I think: let’s stop playing the blame game and get on with the real business of fixing this problem that we find ourselves in. I’m all for a bailout, but not what Congress is suggesting.
I like the idea of feeding the money directly back into the economy. Every working person 24 and up should be eligible to receive a windfall. A real good lump sum, not just $1000. But in order to receive it, a person must go through training. Wealth management and creation, how to build and maintain good credit, spending money responsibly, how to live within our means, how to raise children to be fiscally responsible, etc. Once they’ve completed a battery of courses, they can receive the money. It will be up to each person to use the money wisely.
The real problem here is that we don’t want to feel the pain of our collective mistakes. As a nation, we have allowed ourselves to be overwhelmed by our “instant gratification” mentality. We have allowed the banks and government to turn us into mindless automatons, struggling to buy the bigger TV, bigger car, bigger home, all so that we can feel valuable within ourselves. This is as much our fault as anyone else’s. Could the banks really have been able to commit all this fraud if there were no people to defraud? Could the government have burned us over and over again if we didn’t let them? We have been in the matrix for too long and it’s coming back to bite our collective asses!
Wake up people! A corporate bailout may not be the best solution. A cash windfall to the constituency may not be the best solution. But it’s crystal clear that measures need to be taken in the short-term if we are going to survive this catastrophe. I for one don’t want to lose my job. I don’t want to be homeless. We need to save each other now.
There are no easy answers and there will be no quick fix. But we need to make a decision, stick to it and move it on. Let’s not get bogged down in indecision and politics. The stakes are too high and transcends all of this utter nonsense.
That’s my twenty-five cents (probably all the money I have in the world anyway! :-))
Peace.

Posted by: MsRock4 | September 30, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

90% of the Americans are against a bailout! Let vote whoever vote against people’s will out the Congress in November. They do not deserve the high place!

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 2:33 am 2:33 am

McCain prematurely claimed credit for engineering a bailout right before nearly 70% of House Republicans voted against it. Just like he claimed he won the debate the morning before it took place. With their undying support of McCain/Palin, rigthwing nutjobs prove that they will vote for a potted plant, as long as it promises to pack the Supreme Court with more of their kind.

Posted by: seeifimright | September 30, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

This mess was orginally caused by dems pushing for lowered standards of lending and by the dems pushing the government to guaranteed bad loans—Sorbane-Oxley has reportedly made this worse. Suspend Sorbane-Oxley, tighten lending standards, and instead of buying bad debt—loan the money only to good companies while letting the bad go under. SAVE THE TAXPAYERS.

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 2:34 am 2:34 am

sEE…Mccain never claimed he engineered a bailout. Duh…

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

I am disabled and have bad assests, and would very weel like to receive a bailout plan, too. Would the White House bother to give me one? Eh?

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

McCain said he only returned to Washington to work on the bail out.

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 2:36 am 2:36 am

“By the end of the day the corrupt media will surely blame John Mc Cain for the fact 96 democratic house members voted NO for this bill.”
——————
To infoseeking,
Your comment is just funny and truly strange…
Democrats should not vote for any resolution to bail Republicans mistakes.
Let the Republican government, the Republican congress and senate and the Republican voter to pay for 8 years of misery they caused to all of US. This is just icing on the cake.
It is time all Republicans take responsibility for their actions.
ENOUGH OF REPUBLICAN CORRUPTION, LIES, IMMORALITY, AND MANIPULATION.
ENOUGH OF REPUBLICANS IN POWER
8 YEARS OF TRAGEDY IS MORE THAN ENOUGH.

Posted by: v | September 30, 2008, 2:38 am 2:38 am

I traditionally vote for republicans. But if McCain is voting for the bailout, then he loese my vote. Why, he does not deserve it!

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

‘Congressional sources’ say these are the 4 $700,000,000,000 options? No wonder Congress has a 15% approval rating.
Go back and produce a bill that provides some credit liquidity and thats all. I can’t afford to bail out any more banks or people.

Posted by: John in Anchorage | September 30, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Hi, folks. Is there a way that the American people can demand a natinal referendum on the bailout issue? Isn’t this county a one by the people.
Is it or is it not?

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 2:42 am 2:42 am

all you republicians calm down. we realize you are not to bright,but this no vote is for the best.

Posted by: bill morrison | September 30, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

“This mess was orginally caused by dems pushing for lowered standards of lending and by the dems pushing the government to guaranteed bad loans-”
————
Not true.
This is all Republicans fault.
All republicans, all of them should be doing something about it because democrats and independents are suffering because of the last terrible years of the Republican Party which was voted by republicans.
It is time for all republicans to put up their sleeves and start working to pay this disaster.
Republicans have no say in this story except to pay the disaster they caused.

Posted by: v | September 30, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Where was senator Obama when they voted for the bailout bill?
Is this idiot to be the president?
Obama is NOT a leader!

Posted by: shan | September 30, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

no dax, when you vote them in, you have no more say so.

Posted by: bill morrison | September 30, 2008, 2:47 am 2:47 am

hey shan,
I agree with you!
If somebody wants my vote he/she better be in the senate and work for me during a very difficult time of my country!
Obama was in CO at a rally and McCain was working his A.. off , significantly changed the original bill was to be signed, increased the Republican support for the bill, was asked to leave Washington, even went on to the debate last Friday and came back to Washington same night and still did not get any appreciation from anybody!
AMERICANS DESERVE OBAMA!

Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2008, 2:48 am 2:48 am

Hi shan, all Americans have another change in November this year. Do they not?

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 2:49 am 2:49 am

How Allies Of George Soros Helped Bring Down Wachovia Bank
Wachovia Bank, a major institution, has seen its stock plummet and its continued viability called into question, as the nation’s financial crisis muddles forward. [Update: shortly after publication of this article, Citigroup agreed to purchase Wachovia's banking operations in a deal facilitated by the FDIC.]
Largely ignored in this crisis is the key role played by Herbert and Marion Sandler, founders of Golden West Financial (GDW), one of the largest savings and loans in the nation. Wachovia purchased GDW for $24 billion dollars in 2006. This was one of the worst merger and acquisition deals of all time for the buyer, and remarkably excellent timing on the part of the seller. In essence, Wachovia bought a financial time bomb ticking away, one that exploded this year, bringing down yet another former financial titan and further wrecking Wall Street. [Update: see this commentary from Bllomberg on the role of GDW in the fall of Wachovia.]
How did this transpire and who are the Sandlers?
Herbert and Marion Sandler, a New York lawyer and Wall Street analyst respectively, bought a small California thrift in 1963 and built it into GDW — one of the largest thrifts in the nation. The company’s business was built on adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs. These were mortgages offered at low “teaser” rates that ratcheted upward as interest rates increased. They were often sold aggressively to unsophisticated home buyers who did not comprehend the vast financial risks they were taking, or who assumed that housing prices would rise high enough to provide a profit to them when they sold their houses. They were targets for lenders peddling mortgages that should have been stamped with a skull and crossbones, for these were among the most seductive and dangerous types of mortgage.
This book of business is the core reason for Wachovia’s current difficulties
The Sandlers knew their business far better than any other person could. Not only were they the founders and major owners, they famously ran the company as a husband and wife team for all these years.
So why did they happen to cash out at precisely the right time? Did they see the handwriting on the wall, realizing the massive risks inherent in the mortgages they originated throughout one of the most overheated real estate markets in the nation’s history? They are not talking, but when smart people cash in some of their chips, it’s rarely a good time to bet against them. Nevertheless, Wachovia bet 24 billion dollars and lost big time.
The collapse was primarily caused by the GDW purchase, which became an albatross around Wachovia’s neck soon after the purchase. “Wachovia found itself in ARM’s Way” was the headline of a recent Wall Street Journal article. A huge percentage of these Wachovia ARMs were made to deep subprime borrowers with very poor credit scores. Most of these were “inherited from its ill-timed acquisition of Golden West” at the end of the housing boom in 2006.
The Sandlers have started to invest their billions of dollars politically, in the manner of George Soros, sugar daddy of many far-left wing groups and an early and prominent supporter of Presidential candidate Barack Obama. Soros has developed an empire of so-called 527 groups, putatively independent political activists groups that have influence within the Democratic Party. These 527 groups include the Center for American Progress, MoveOn.Org, Human Rights Watch, Media Matters and a slew of other like-minded groups .
This set of political organizations also includes the International Crisis Group, whose foreign policy staff is likely to contain the embryonic future of the State Department in an Obama Administration . Eli Pariser, who heads MoveOn.Org, boasts about his group’s role in the Democratic Party:
“Now it’s our party: we bought it, we own it, and we are going to take it back.”
They have already done so, in large measure.
The top four donors to these 527 groups in the last Presidential election cycle (2004) were Soros, Peter Lewis of Progressive Insurance, Steven Bing, and Herbert and Marion Sandler . Collectively they gave 78 million dollars to left-leaning 527 groups. That was just in 2004. They have become much more ambitious over the last few years.
Soros, Lewis, and the Sandlers form a core group of billionaire activists and Democrat partisans who have formed a group called The Democracy Alliance. They realized that they could magnify their power by working in unison and tapping other wealthy donors to further their agenda (the superb Boston Globe article “Follow the money” is a good primer on how money and 527 groups have come together to have a huge impact on politics in America).
The Democracy Alliance is a major avenue to help them achieve their goals. The roster of its growing membership consists of a list of billionaires and mere multi-millionaires who collectively hope to give upwards of 500 million dollars each year to further promote a left-wing agenda. A partial roster of the Democracy Alliance membership can be found here.
Half a billion dollars a year can purchase a great deal of influence.
The Sandlers certainly know quite a bit about leverage from their savings and loan days.
Among the beneficiaries of their largesse: Air America, ACORN (a group that has very close and long lasting ties to Barack Obama and has a long history of engaging in voter fraud. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (basically a private detective group focused on the private faults and foibles of Republicans), Media Matters, a media watchdog group that engages in harsh partisan attacks against media figures and articles it considers supportive of Republicans). The list goes on and on.
They are not merely out to elect Democrats, but to also permanently realign U.S. politics and shift our society and culture in a far-left wing direction.
One of the steps the Sandlers have taken on their own is to start ProPublica with a 10 million dollar donation, a sum which they promise to replenish annually. This is an outfit that will engage in investigative journalism and will provide its “findings” to larger media outlets for greater impact at no cost. American Thinker was among the first outlets to express wariness over ProPublica and the approach it would take given the ideology of its founding couple. Even Jane Mayer of the New Yorker described the Sandlers as hard-core partisans. Other publications shared our concern about ProPublica. Investor’s Business Daily commented in an editorial:
Could a couple of left-wing billionaires really be sincere about creating a “nonpartisan,” “non-ideological” center for investigative reporting? Or is the pair just paying more to drive the media agenda further left?
One problem: The Sandlers fund both leftist causes and the Democratic Party. In fact, they rank in the top tier of donors. In 2004 they gave MoveOn.org $2.5 million, or as much money as their philanthropic ally, George Soros.
Along with Soros and billionaire Peter Lewis, the Sandlers fund some of the most important players of what is now known as the “progressive” left. In 2003, the three together funded about a third of the Center for American Progress think tank, which has close staff ties to Hillary Clinton.
Now if this enterprise were called a “progressive” nonprofit, as other projects are, it wouldn’t be news. But given the chairmanship of Herbert Sandler, and Steiger’s claim that ProPublica will be run according to the “strictest standards of journalistic impartiality and fairness,” there’s reason to wonder if this isn’t a new bid to drive the political agenda leftward under media disguise.
“We will look hard at the critical functions of business and government, the two biggest centers of power, in areas ranging from product safety to securities fraud, from flaws in our system of criminal justice to practices that undermine fair elections,” its Web site says.
I would be very surprised indeed if the malfeasance of ACORN will ever be investigated by Publica, for its undermining of fair elections.
Unsurprisingly, though, ProPublica has already shown that agenda-driven journalism is its founding principle. One of its first pieces of “investigative journalism” was an attack on the oil and gas industry for developing the Marcellus Shale (a vast natural gas reservoir located in northeast America). ProPublica reported that developing this domestic energy source would damage the environment and advocated that these resources not be developed.
The New York Sun took ProPublica to task for the accuracy of its reporting and for the foolishness of its conclusion:
Geology.com reports on a study earlier this year by a geology professor at the State University of New York at Fredonia, Gary Lash, who found that the Marcellus Shale may contain more than 500 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.
If 10% of that is recoverable, it could supply America’s natural gas needs for two years and would have a “wellhead value” of $1 trillion, according to Geology.com. In other words, by the time the story is over, upstate New York will end up looking not like Appalachia but like Dallas or Dubai.
The national security consequences would also be considerable. Every unit of energy that comes from upstate New York is a unit that doesn’t have to come from Iran or Venezuela or Saudi Arabia or some other nation hostile to America and known for spawning or supporting terrorists.
As for the environmental risks, they are surmountable. As we noted in our July 25 editorial, “The Barnett Shale,” that natural gas field has been mined without any ill effects on the metropolitan area of Dallas Fort-Worth, which sits atop it. Not only have there been no ill effects, there have been remarkable benefits in terms of prosperity, growth, and increased tax revenues.
Maybe the Sandlers are helping their political ally George Soros, a hedge fund manager who runs an offshore fund whose investors may well include some of the world’s wealthiest and most anti-American petrocats. Shielded from scrutiny by offshore operations, the names of Soros’s investors are a closely-guarded secret. But perhaps more than a few of them would look askance at expedited development of our own energy resources. We would be less dependent on petrodollar rich abroad, and the price of oil and gas would weaken, should domestic energy resources like the Marcellus Shale be developed.
While the Sandlers personally made 2.4 billion dollars on the 24 billion dollar sale of Golden West Financial to Wachovia, the employees (including their own former employees) and shareholders of Wachovia, including those who have invested their retirement money and children’s college funds in Wachovia stock and bonds, are not doing nearly so well. Communities where Wachovia has branches that may be closed as a cost-saving measure will also suffer. But worst hurt of all will be the homeowners who were sold mortgages that they should have never been offered, by a lender far more sophisticated than they were.
And here I thought that Democrat partisans were supposed to protect the little people.
So far as I know, the Sandlers have not offered to reinvest any of their gains into Wachovia to help it recover. It appears to be far more fun taking those ill-begotten billions and use them to fund an ever-expanding “left-wing conspiracy.”

Posted by: Julliett | September 30, 2008, 2:50 am 2:50 am

shan,
the only i…t is Cain and you for following the steps of an old erratic man who does not know where he is standing or doing in this planet, and whose actions and ways of thinking are from last century.
And you should be working instead of blogging, to pay the debt that your party put on the US taxpayer.
Thanks for nothing Republican Shan. You already voted to destroy our country and still want some more.
What kind of patriot is behind the computer?
As a Republican you and none of you have any right to speak or say anything. Just pay us our money back.

Posted by: v | September 30, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Obama did not show any leadershio for the worst economic disaster so far at all!
He is not getting my vote after this!
NADER/GONZALES

Posted by: ANGRY DEMOCRAT | September 30, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

v,
Who said that I am a Republican?
I am not a Republican, I am an independent!
Independents will go for McCain after yesterday’s bailout failure!
Where was senator Obama when they voted for the bailout?
Answer my question!Till yesterday, I did not decide who to vote for , even liked Obama at Friday’s debate!
get lost!

Posted by: shan | September 30, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

v- you obviosly know nothing but your probably a paid liberal hack because you are obviously unaware of the democrates with dirty hand bush and the democratic leadership are in bed together–doesnt that seem strange to you–it is 95 democrates and 123 republican who are right–the american people are pissed off they know a scam when they see it –but you my friend are blind–im going to say a prayer that god will give you the wisdom to see things as they really are and that you call your senator and congressman and tell him if he vote with the washington elite he will be voted out of office–please join us who are against this bailout

Posted by: cisc | September 30, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

ANGRY DEMOCRAT,
Ha, Ha, Ha.
A joke….and a liar.

Posted by: v | September 30, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am

Same question again. Is there a way that the Americans nationwide can demand a national referendum to decide the cash for trash bailout plan issue?

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

It is not only the Dow Jones but Barrack Obama to go down from this point on!
mark my post!
Obama could have gone to Washingtion and gotten his party together to pass the bill!
Obama failed to lead, I agree!
Polls will go down for Obama as Dow Jones did!
McCain increased te Republicans who voted from ONLY 5 to 64
WHAT DID OBAMA DO ?
ZERO

Posted by: Faith | September 30, 2008, 3:00 am 3:00 am

“Perhaps it will take a great depression to wake up citizens to the fact that socialism doesn’t work.”
Good point. Only one small suggestion: Substitute The word “capitalism” for “socialism.”

Posted by: Markfromatlanta | September 30, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

All people who voted republican in the last 8 years are guilty for this bail out.
All people who voted republican in the last 8 years allowed the republican government to abuse the American people.
All people who voted republican in the last 8 years allowed the republican government the killing of over 4,000 soldiers lives, 1,000 katrina lives, 2,000,000 families lost their homes,
millions more lost their jobs, millions are losing their money in the markets.
Why?
Because some republican fanatics continue putting party loyalty over country…and are willing to do it again.
Republicans are not patriots…they love power and hate whatever stands in their way.
So now it pay back time. All republicans should be ashamed and start working to pay innocent independents and democrats our money back.

Posted by: v | September 30, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

Provide a bill that gives liquidity to the markets. Paulsen said the only problem was a credit crunch. Pass a one page bill to do that now, let the markets write off their losses over a longer period of time.
Don’t pretend you need more money when you have been doing nothing but throwing money at this problem for a year and it has done nothing. Keep the govt. out of business, period.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | September 30, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

i love the way they keep saying we won’t be able to get a car loan lol…why would anybody want a new car their is no oil to fuel our cars anyway. and the price of gas is too unreliable. no intelligent person would buy a new car when electric and other hy bird auto options are coming on line which we won’t be able to afford either. time to hitch our wagons, ride our bikes, and use public transit. the bailout is intended to infuse the market with new lending to keep suckering us into more rabid consumerism and debt.

Posted by: colorado | September 30, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

Both Obama and McCain are tested and failed to lead this country!
None of them were able to do anything so far!
McCain put at least some good faith and went to Washington, at least tried, but when it comes to Obama, he really is an empty suit. Obama reminds me Rev Jackson lately!
Too much talk no works

Posted by: Brian | September 30, 2008, 3:03 am 3:03 am

Gosh, I hope the don’t take any breaks for, say, Islamic, Hindu or Buddhist holidays during this “crisis”.

Posted by: Sayin | September 30, 2008, 3:05 am 3:05 am

my opinion both candidates need to dum their VP choices due to the economic crisis and replace them with new candidates with good economic background! I mean it!
WHAT THE HELL BARRACK OBAMA and JOE BIDEN knows about the economy?
The same thing for JOHN MCCAIN and SARAH PALIN!

Posted by: Kate | September 30, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

Mc Cain did only shows his incapacity to rule his party or anyone else for that matter.
He is old and highly irrational and erratic.
Obama is an intelligent, thoughtful person…and by the way, he did not need to go to perform a parody in Washington.
Democrats had the votes all along to help Republicans save this bill.
I hope Democrats do not pay the bill.
This bill is for Republicans to pay.
ENOUGH OF REPUBLICAN LIES AND CORRUPTION.

Posted by: v | September 30, 2008, 3:08 am 3:08 am

All I want to say is that let folks voting against the will of the people be out of the precious high places in November! Let the Wall Street Execs find a way out if they want to live. Trust me, they not gonna jump out of the window from the 4th floor.

Posted by: dax | September 30, 2008, 3:09 am 3:09 am

CPLViper says,
Let’s see –
What were we looking at the last time that Democrats had the Presidency in 2000?
National prosperity, 22 million jobs created, a 150 billion dollar surplus.
Whose tax plan in 1993, which increased taxes for the wealthy, did Republicans say was going to destroy the economy, when instead it produced a record economic boom?
http://books.google.com/books?id=Z_DTwljcixsC&pg=PA183&lpg=PA183&dq=republican+predictions+1993+tax+plan&source=web&ots=vYWAL3KJa8&sig=4lvPLxnu4rXorzQfAhFrrCQ-mwg&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=8&ct=result
The Democrats
Who has been in President for the last 8 years? During which we’ve had the least amount of job creation since the Great Depression? Scandal after scandal? Crisis after crisis? Four trillion dollars added to the debt for nothing, because this economy is what we have to show for it?
George Bush, a Republican.
Who have been in charge of the Presidency and both Houses of Congress for eight years?
Republicans
Who authored the bill that repealed Glass-Steagall, a protection against the kind of thing we’re seeing now?
Phil Gramm – A Republican – one of John McCain’s best friends, previous campaign co-chair and a chief economic adviser to his campaign
Who voted in the Senate to approve this bill?
Only Republicans
Who authored an even worse bill on credit default swaps – one the real causes of the present disaster to anyone who knows anything about finance – read about it in Newsweek
http://www.newsweek.com/id/161199
That would be Phil Gramm again- a Republican
Whose campaign manager’s company took fifteen thousand dollars a month from Fannie Mae up until last month? (Although to anyone who knows anything, Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac are not responsible for the crisis – by definition they did not give out subprime loans although they did buy up “Alt-A” loans and certainly contributed to the mess).
http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2008/09/24/blog-buzz-rick-daviss-fannie-freddie-scandal-continues-mccain-and-the-bailout-obama-leads-in-a-poll.html
John McCain – a Republican
Who cut the Feds interest rates to near zero in an effort to try to make George Bush’s ridiculous trickle down economic policies and his own past mistakes look good? Thus inflating the housing bubble beyond all reason?
Alan Greenspan – a Republican.
John McCain says he knows little about economics, but has read Greenspan’s books
Who is blaming minorities for the present crisis, which is a crock of crap distracting attention from yourself by blaming blacks, Jews, whatever – Hispanics in Florida and the West take notice please?
http://ta-nehisicoates.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/09/debunking_the_blame_the_negroes_conspiricy_theory.php
Republicans
Who’s taking us for a bunch of ignoramuses?
CPLViper – a Republican

Posted by: seeifimright | September 30, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

huckabee just said ‘the same people that burned thanksgiving dinner now want us to let them cook christmas dinner’. i love the way he comes up with these common sense analogies.

Posted by: colorado | September 30, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

KATE,
I think that John McCain should pick Newt Gingric or Mit Romney.
barrack Obama should pick, Michale Bloomberg
it is the best post I had seen here!

Posted by: John | September 30, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

i do not believe our economy will get better by increasing taxes in the middle of a serious economic downturn
OBAMA CAN NOT WIN THIS ELECTION ,
GET REAL

Posted by: Hary | September 30, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

I didn’t post above what CPLViper actually said, but it was along the lines of
“Its unfortunate that a lot of people blame this crisis on President Bush and the Republicans” etc.

Posted by: seeifimright | September 30, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am

If she talks like a milf, and walks like a milf then.. she must be a milf.. wait that wasnt the question…
sorry i misread, im admitting i made the mistake there. other than milf like qualities, she has none.

Posted by: hoomyaj | September 30, 2008, 3:14 am 3:14 am

pennsylvaniavoter
Biden says, “No to Clean Coal Plants in the USA. Call PPL and tell them they are loved by Biden the No Clean Coal Man.
My Vote is going here:
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

It is such a bad situation, both candidates made their choices for VP pick.
neither Joe Biden nor Sarah palin do not offer andy economic solid knowledge!
I do not have to remind you both Barrack Obama and John McCain have no clue either!

Posted by: Stern | September 30, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

Hemi Why don’t you go onto the Center for Responsive Politics website and look at where Obama gets all of his money.
Posted by: alpaig52
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yeah, I checked it out. So he gets money from all over the place, so what. McCain has the whole RNC feeding him cash. If your talking about Obama getting money from all over the world, and some people going over the 2300 limit, I think it’s funny.
In a letter dated June 25, 2008, the FEC asked the Obama campaign to verify a series of $25 donations from a contributor identified as “Will, Good” from Austin, Texas.
Mr. Good Will listed his employer as “Loving” and his profession as “You.
Isn’t that funny? Obama said the system was broken and it gave McCain a big advantage, so I don’t blame him one bit. As long as he don’t have a stack of lobbyists running his campaign like McCain, it’s all good with me.

Posted by: Hemi | September 30, 2008, 3:18 am 3:18 am

American businesses can not simply afford to pay any taxes after this melt down!
Therefore Obama can not simply be the next president!
Obama will increase your taxes!
Everything will get worse , I mean worst!

Posted by: James | September 30, 2008, 3:19 am 3:19 am

CPLViper I read, the republicans got their panties in a twist because Pelosi said something they did not like so they voted to punish the country and the world economy. I stand by what I said: For anyone who plans to retire, has a 401k, or who owns stock in anyway, understand this: George Bush and McCain and their economy philosophy and system have just lost you 7% of everything you invested, 770 points, over $1 trillion lost today alone; not including the losses from last week. So again, whatever you think about the other guy before you pull the poll for McCain just know that he and his people have messed up your money. Thats not a a red or blue issue, this is a green issue; we are all losing money.

Posted by: jase | September 30, 2008, 3:20 am 3:20 am

I don’t like the Iraq war, so don’t like John McCain
I don’t like goverment spending and increasing taxes, so I don’t like Barrack Obama either!
I am voting for nader/Gonzales

Posted by: NONE | September 30, 2008, 3:21 am 3:21 am

i am hispanic and have been involved as a case manager with the non legal mexican community. i had several experiences working in phoenix with families from mexico who were here illegally and many were buying large expensive homes. several of these families asked me if they could borrow money from our agency to turn on the utilities for their new homes. absolutely the community reinvestment act was forking over home loans to people who could not afford these loans let alone turn on the utilities. that was just my personal experience. i would imagine that millions of these bad loans were made. and now we are expected to bailout these greedy pigs for making bad loans to people they knew could not afford them? and they want more money to fork over to acorn to keep up this. i think not.

Posted by: colorado | September 30, 2008, 3:24 am 3:24 am

I did not find Obama to be interested in being a leader! He had the chance to come across and get this deal done at Washington!
Obama is failed to prove me his leadership and ignored American interest!
Since I do not like the war in Iraq, i join those who are voting for Ralph Nader! I know how important CO is for Obama, he lost one vote! That is me!

Posted by: Adam, CO | September 30, 2008, 3:26 am 3:26 am

Lets all not forget that McCain said the economy is sound hahaha I honestly find this all funny

Posted by: jase | September 30, 2008, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Breaking news!
Ralp Nader is at 8% even in MA!
I bet his polls will climb uo after the failed bailout bill!

Posted by: Tom, MA | September 30, 2008, 3:29 am 3:29 am

I will ssee those people who are against this bill when they can’t buy a car, loose their jobs soon!
I was for Obama till yesterday!
I still can not believe , I donated to his campaign and he did not even showed up to vote for the historic bailout bill for me!
after this collapse, who ever to be the president, will not make a change!
So why not wasting my vote for
Nader/Gonzales 2008

Posted by: Harriet | September 30, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

If I were senator Mccain, i’d change my position on taxes and wave Capital gains Tax for a second further notice due to economic crisis to get economy going!
McCain than will win by a landslide victory!

Posted by: SMART POLITICS | September 30, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am

The web ad. for Obama at ABC website is so funny
Obama looks like a Jackass
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Posted by: WEB AD | September 30, 2008, 3:36 am 3:36 am

No New World order as supported by the Democrats and the Republicans.
My Vote is going here: Republican and Democrats never change they stay the same because they are one in the same.
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 3:39 am 3:39 am

Adam, CO
My Vote is going here: Republican and Democrats never change they stay the same because they are one in the same.
http://www.baldwin08.com/

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 3:41 am 3:41 am

Katrina is the fault of the republicans—-I don’t think so. It was mostly the fault of druggies and alcholics of NOLA to stupid, to lazy, and to drugged out to help themselves. The difference between NO and the rest of the cities hit is astromical. No one including the government can save stupid people from themselves.

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 3:50 am 3:50 am

Katrina in NO could have been avoided simply if the idiots living there would have made their idiot corrupt leaders like Nagin who they again voted in ensure the levees that they lived behind were properly maintained. What type of moron lives behind a broken levee, stays when a hurricane is going to hit knowing it will break, and then whines?

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

Thanks Demcrats- for taking all my hard-earned life savings.

Posted by: jax | September 30, 2008, 3:55 am 3:55 am

I’m glad the bill wasn’t passed. I believe in free enterprise. Let those who made bad decisions suffer for them instead of having the government force the taxpayers to suffer instead. This government has already run up several hundred billion dollars in indebtedness to foreign countries – where does it think it’s going to get the money to bail out the banks? From China? Saudi Arabia? where? We’re already into them for almost a billion dollars – if we keep on borrowing from other countries, pretty soon America won’t be American any more.

Posted by: Kaelinda | September 30, 2008, 3:58 am 3:58 am

V…I am sorry you are having trouble with facts…but do try to learn. This mortgage crisis is the fault of dems—they created it and then they interference everytime someone tried to prevent it for the last 9 years of so. Greenspan and even Bush warned of this………….and McCain tried to have legistlation with his name on it was introduced to try to stop it. The House passed McCain’s bill, unfortunately the Senate did not. Thank you Frank, Pelosi, Reid and almost the entire black demmie Caucas for really socking it to us all.
This mess was orginally caused by dems pushing for lowered standards of lending and by the dems pushing the government to guaranteed bad loans—Sorbane-Oxley has reportedly made this worse. Suspend Sorbane-Oxley, tighten lending standards, and instead of buying bad debt—loan the money only to good companies while letting the bad go under. SAVE THE TAXPAYERS.

Posted by: chattyway | September 30, 2008, 4:03 am 4:03 am

Jase -
a trillion dollars “lost” is the same toxic assets the “bailout” plan would protect. While capital markets will be squeezed until there’s a resolution (and there will be one, by week’s end, I’d bet, what’s the long-term value in keeping the value of those portfolios articially inflated?
We accept losses in the market when technologies become obsolete, when M&A goes bad and drags both companies down, when consumer demand for something dries up, etc. Why should the market value of worthless stocks/securities be any different?
Yes,it’s a big hit to take…but adjustment needs to happen. Same as real estate prices are adjusting when the bubble of constant growth burst, so should the stock market.
If not,then I’d rather the government give me the thousands $ I may stand to lose in presumed home value than to artifically prop up my 401(k)and instituions that may need to fall before they can build themselves up properly (fire and brimstone approaches are often productive).

Posted by: home | September 30, 2008, 4:04 am 4:04 am

Nancy Pelosi is at fault for the failure to pass this bill. You don’t throw salt in the wounds, & tar and feathers when trying to get Republicans to vote for something that the Democrats could pass all on their own. Nancy should have lined up the votes on the Democratic side, if she was going to bash and blame everything on Bush and the Republicans. Only 12 more Democrats could have passed the bill. Blame Nancy and her high-handed-ness.
The credit crunch will impact Main street in very few house, car, or Small Business loans. Basically banks will go back to only lending money to those who don’t need it. Welcome to Nancy Pelosi’s New Great Depression! Way to go Nancy – where is the bread line?

Posted by: Ekim Gnilierd | September 30, 2008, 4:10 am 4:10 am

There are two presidential candidates more qualified than Obama. There is no scandalous background that shows the two candidates to be other than honest men with strong beliefs in America and the Constitution of America. The Democrats picked the wrong man. Then again, these two men are honest Americans that probably wanted nothing to do with the Democrats.
Click here and judge for yourself. Both men meet all the qualifications for the presidency of the United States better than Obama.
http://www.votenader.org/about/
http://www.baldwin08.com/
There is no question about integrity when you look at these two men. We are
not partial to either man, but Obama is a NO…. NO…. NO WAY.

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Where’s my bailout? Oh yeah, it’s only for the theives on Wall Street. Way to represent us Congress.
Vote all the incumbents out!

Posted by: Adam | September 30, 2008, 4:20 am 4:20 am

Hey Judge!
I agree with you partially!
Obama is a NO NO way but McCain won’t get my vote either!
I do not want the war in Iraq!
Our economy is sinking, why can’t McCain change his polkicies and calls for withdraw?
He won’t do that so he won’t get my vote!
NADER/GONZALES

Posted by: Gail | September 30, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am

Both Baldwin and Dr paul are an anti-semites!
No way!
I like NADER/GONZALES

Posted by: Adam, CO | September 30, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am

Anybody who would vote for Baldwin and Castle or even Nader for that matter hasn’t got the sense of a 5 year old. Take your opinions and shove them where the sun don’t shine. And if your that stupid not to be able to figure where that is, I can understand you voting for those losers. Hahahahahahaha

Posted by: My name is nobody | September 30, 2008, 4:28 am 4:28 am

We are a group of Democrats decided to support Ralph Nader.
Obama does not deserve to be the president of the United States.
Obama ignored Americans at yesterday’s bailout bill , he did not do anythung for America!
Ralph Nader is for Green enviroment, against the Iraq war and has better plans for our economy!
NADER/GONZALES 2008

Posted by: DEMOCRATS FOR NADER | September 30, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am

mynameisnobody,
Do not under estimate Ralph Nader!
he continues to climb at polls at akmost every state!

Posted by: DEMOCRATS FOR NADER | September 30, 2008, 4:31 am 4:31 am

mynameisnobody,
Do not under estimate Ralph Nader!
he continues to climb at polls at almost every state!
It is impossible for some Democrats to vote for McCain because of the Iraq war!
I will not vote for Obama either!
A third party is the solution now!

Posted by: DEMOCRATS FOR NADER | September 30, 2008, 4:32 am 4:32 am

My name is nobody That is because you are a nobody with intellect.
Click here and judge for yourself. Both men meet all the qualifications for the presidency of the United States better than Obama.
http://www.votenader.org/about/
http://www.baldwin08.com/
There is no question about integrity when you look at these two men. We are
not partial to either man, but Obama is a NO…. NO…. NO WAY.

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 4:34 am 4:34 am

I just got up and has been reading the posts.
What I like is RALPH NADER
http://www.votenader.org/index.html?submitted

Posted by: Alex | September 30, 2008, 4:36 am 4:36 am

Nader/Gonzales or Baldwin/Castle, the idiots of this race. Give me a break. What moron in he’s right mind would vote for those people. Now I have seen and heard some stupid people in my life, but Adam,CO Gail,Judge,WEB AD.Harriet, (who are all the same person btw),is really ignorant if he or she thinks they can fool people with this dribble. Thats ok, you go waste your vote if you like, but come November 4, it will be Obama in a landslide victory. The you losers will have something else to whine about.

Posted by: My name is nobody | September 30, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

Gail
I like McCain as a person, but he is part of the WASHINGTON crowd, and so is No Way Obama.
McCain has a long way to go to be separated from Washington and business associates.
http://www.votenader.org/about/
http://www.baldwin08.com/
There is no question about integrity when you look at these two men. We are
not partial to either man, but Obama is a NO…. NO…. NO WAY.

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am

Nader/Gonzales or Baldwin/Castle
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Best laugh I had all day

Posted by: My name is nobody | September 30, 2008, 4:40 am 4:40 am

a vote for nader (or any third party) is a vote wasted unfortunately

Posted by: BillyBob | September 30, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am

There is no doubt that Obama was picked by the Democrats so they would have a puppet on a string. Joe Biden would be a back door president.
http://www.votenader.org/about/
http://www.baldwin08.com/
There is no question about integrity when you look at these two men. We are not partial to either man, but Obama is a NO…. NO…. NO WAY.

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 4:46 am 4:46 am

Adam,CO Gail,Judge,WEB AD.Harriet are all paid political bloggers. Don’t even bother reading the dribble. Most of it is one person spewing all the garbage. Like anyones is going to change their minds. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Posted by: My name is nobody | September 30, 2008, 4:47 am 4:47 am

Just like Obama and his supporters. When they can not take the heat, they lie.
http://www.votenader.org/about/
http://www.baldwin08.com/
There is no question about integrity when you look at these two men. We are not partial to either man, but Obama is a NO…. NO…. NO WAY.

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

When people lose the confident, it’s game over for Wall Street and then Main Street. I converted all my investment including my sons’ 529 fund to fixed income (Cash and bonds) last Friday after bought 2500 shares of WaMu on Thursday, and lost almost $6000 on that Thursday night when the FDIC seized the Bank and sold to JPMorgan 1.9 Billions and investors got nothing from the deal.
Would you like to invest anymore especially Bank Stocks? For sure, I won’t. I would rather gamble in Las Vega, at least I can enjoy and have some free drink.

Posted by: stock_craft | September 30, 2008, 5:07 am 5:07 am

Just a partial list Of Ralph Nader’s accomplishments:
American Antitrust Institute
Appleseed Foundation
Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest
Aviation Consumer Action Project
Buyers Up
Capitol Hill News Service
Center for Auto Safety
Center for Insurance Research
Center for Justice and Democracy
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Center for Study of Responsive Law
Center for Women Policy Studies
Citizen Action Group
Citizen Advocacy Center
Citizen Utility Boards
Citizen Works
Clean Water Action Project
Congress Project
Congress Watch
Connecticut Citizen Action Group
Corporate Accountability Research Group
Critical Mass Energy Project
Democracy Rising
Disability Rights Center
Equal Justice Foundation
Essential Information
FANS (Fight to Advance the Nation’s Sports)
Foundation for Taxpayers and Consumer Rights
Freedom of Information Clearinghouse
Georgia Legal Watch
Global Trade Watch
Health Research Group
Litigation Group
Multinational Monitor
National Citizen’s Coalition for Nursing Home Reform
National Coalition for Universities in the Public Interest
National Insurance Consumer Organization
Ohio Public Interest Action Group
Organization for Competitive Markets
Pension Rights Center
Princeton Project 55
PROD – truck safety
Public Citizen
Retired Professionals Action Group
Shafeek Nader Trust for the Community Interest
Student Public Interest Research Groups nationwide
Tax Reform Research Group
Telecommunications Research and Action Center
The Visitor’s Center
Trial Lawyers for Public Justice
http://www.votenader.org/about/
What are No…No…No Way Obama’s accomplishments?

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 5:08 am 5:08 am

stock_craft:
A wise investor would have better selected stocks more than a year ago. I lost a few cents compared to you. I am sorry for your loss. Now you can see way I am selecting either
http://www.votenader.org/about/
http://www.baldwin08.com/
There is no question about integrity when you look at these two men. We are not partial to either man, but Obama is a NO…. NO…. NO WAY. McCain is on the back burner.

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am

If a Bailout must be voted on, why does no one think that a bailout from the bottom up will work. I have been watching ALL the news channels and there are a few thoughtful people to include Ben Stein that says why can’t this bailout be used to help people stay in their homes by addressing mortgage problems. Not by giving the Financial markets the money, but the people who are hurting and hurting bad.
The one thing that makes this Wall Street Bailout in its current form so toxic to the American People, is that it is a bailout to institutions that provide “credit”. Talk to any American who has been late on a credit card payment, mortgage payment and all they will tell you is how ruthless and predatory these companies are that want their money. All of sudden you are down financially down due to job loss, cut back in hours, etc. and you are getting hammered with phone calls, emails, letters by these financial giants. Your interest rates sky rocket, late fees are accrued and it doesn’t take long to get buried. You then have to make a choice of providing minimum payments (God forbid you are late and your credit score takes a hit) vs. providing food, gas, rent/mortgage payment for your family. I was sued by Capital One over a $500.00 credit card. They won the suit and were awarded almost $1500.00 All I am trying to due is pay my bills and provide for my family. Most people see this as a rescue attempt for the very institutions that have caused them so much pain. Not a whole lot of sympathy out there for these companies. Most Americans would rather suffer, than provide relief to these perceived predatory lenders.
Please do not give in to the pressures of trying to pass this Bailout in its current form.

Posted by: Kevgron | September 30, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am

This is the crap that de-regulation caused, we let these banks run around doing whatever they wanted to do, and now that they have fluck up, now BUSH want the tax payers to bail them out, Paulson was one of the CEO’s that got a golden parachutt but he don’t want us to know that, then they want the peoples that caused the problem, to watch over the 700 billion dollars, this is another scandal that Bush, Paulson, and McCain and the Republican party have created by not checking the Executive branch and getting rid of regulation on thses banks, remember Bush talking aobut the haves and the have not’s, then he called the haves his base in 2004, well the haves had been out there screwing us, the haves been out there having fun and sex with the oil company employees, off of tax payers money, now they are in trouble they want us to give them more, I bet Bush said let’s put this one on the taxyers too.

Posted by: Jerry | September 30, 2008, 5:35 am 5:35 am

Government regulation made the banks give everyone a loan, even with bad credit and little means to pay the mortgage. Look back to Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton and the American people taking advantage of easy credit.
The Americans have complained about the bailout legislation. They only point their finger in the direction of President Bush, Wall Street and the banks. It is time for the taxpayers to assume the brunt of the problem by using credit without consideration and no thought of tomorrow. Well, tomorrow has arrived and it is a financial mess created by everyone.
After much thought and investigation, we are backing and voting for Ralph Nader.
http://www.votenader.org/about/
NO…. NO…. NO WAY Obama. McCain is on the back burner.

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 6:33 am 6:33 am

McCain is to blame for the failure of the bill to pass. Obama warned about injecting presidential politics into this bailout bill but McCain’s campaign was faltering and therefore he put self before country and screwed it even form his own party ranks. Republicans are a disgrace and should be punished with more losses in the house and ultimately the presidency. McBush should not be elected unless Americans want a deep plunge in their image abroad and far greater financial peril. If you want all this vote McCain.

Posted by: Phil Gramm | September 30, 2008, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Government regulation made the banks give everyone a loan, even with bad credit and little means to pay the mortgage. Look back to Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton and the American people taking advantage of easy credit.
The Americans have complained about the bailout legislation. They only point their finger in the direction of President Bush, Wall Street and the banks. It is time for the taxpayers to assume the brunt of the problem by using credit without consideration and no thought of tomorrow. Well, tomorrow has arrived and it is a financial mess created by everyone.
After a thorough investigation, there is no doubt in backing and voting for
Ralph Nader.
http://www.votenader.org/about/
NO…. NO…. NO WAY Obama. McCain is on the back burner. Obama failed our investigation. McCain did somewhat better

Posted by: Judge | September 30, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

Where is the leadership by the majority leaders?
The political posturing on both sides is the reason for this bill’s failure. Until we the people realize that a two party system creates this massive morass of incompetence in Washington we will be forced to see this country continue down the path of ruination by our political system.
What we are seeing now is partisan politics that is tearing apart our country with no political party willing to capitulate for the good of the country.
It is time for an Independent party that can break through the partisan politics of Washington.

Posted by: Independent minded | September 30, 2008, 6:59 am 6:59 am

Vote No, to the $700 bilion bailout! Only ones to profit from the bailout are the Rich! and the Republicans!

Posted by: Demo Rules | September 30, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

I like that idea. There is 200mil legit americans who are 18 and over.
Give the 750 billion dollars to us.
Works out to $375000 per adult!!!!
Thats $375000 to go towards paying off any debt that we have and we get the rest in cash !!!!
We can all agree that the economy would be BOOMING again.

Posted by: infoseeking | September 30, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am

I’m tired of these “life-long Republicans” who are suddenly “leaving” the party over this. If you were really conservative at the very least you would empathize with the desire for a free-market solution to this problem and our natural aversion to those who want to turn America into a socialist waste-land.
I’d rather eat dirt for the next five, six, or seven years in a massive depression than turn this country over to the Hugo Chavez mentality.

Posted by: dtrod | September 30, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Nobailout.org
Send your congressional leaders an email telling them you do not want any bailout of any kind.
The only people they want to bailout are the executives, that’s why there is such a dire need for this bailout.
They are starting to know what it feels like to struggle for every penny.
Don’t let them off the hook..

Posted by: Angelo | September 30, 2008, 7:42 am 7:42 am

Posted by: EddieV | September 30, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Anything that Nancy Pelosi and her left wing cronies are for the rest of Congress should vote opposite. She has proven time and time again she is a super liberal and is the main reason for such an ineffective Congress. She needs to be shelved along with her other liberal friends. 17% approval rating and dropping!!

Posted by: Pee Vee, Long Island | September 30, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am

Oh by the way, I see a couple of Obama’s other friends, Fannie and Freddie are under a Grand Jury investigation. The list of his shady friends gets bigger and bigger. Wait till they start investigating ACORN, another of Obama’s close associations. What does it take to see that this guy is a shady as it comes!

Posted by: Pee Vee, Long Island | September 30, 2008, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Oh I forgot, when the investigations are over and his friends go to jail, the Messiah Obama will say he denounced his association and distanced himself from them and all will be FORGIVEN!!

Posted by: Pee Vee, Long Island | September 30, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Phil Gramm, the noted Economist was dead right. We have become a nation of whiners-just let the Free Market destroy the world.
After all, W and Mccain (certainly not reflecting the President) both certified that there was nothing wrong with the economy. The wizards on Wall Street need a free hand and fat paychecks to stick it to all of us.
By using the Social Security trust Fund to buy up all these worthless ‘assets’, W and Gang may still land up ‘privatizing’ Social Security.

Posted by: Goofy | September 30, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Chris Cuomo should be taken behind the woodshed for the hysterical way in which he conducted the interview with the two members of Congress who wisely voted against the bailout. I guess being from a political family hinders ones ability to be an unbiased reporter. His Murrow award should be revoked.

Posted by: nochildleft | September 30, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

This was forwarded to me this morning – sounds like a good idea compared to what is actually going to happen….
The Birk Economic Recovery Plan
Hi Pals,
I’m against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.
Instead, I’m in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in a ‘We Deserve It Dividend’.
To make the math simple, let’s assume there are 200,000,000 bon-a-fide U.S. Citizens 18+.
Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up..
So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billon that equals $425,000.00.
My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a ‘We Deserve It Dividend’.
Of course, it would NOT be tax free. So let’s assume a tax rate of 30%.
Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes. That sends $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam.
But it means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their pocket. A husband and wife has $595,000.00.
What would you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family?
Pay off your mortgage – housing crisis solved.
Repay college loans – what a great boost to new grads
Put away money for college – it’ll be there
Save in a bank – create money to loan to entrepreneurs.
Buy a new car – create jobs
Invest in the market – capital drives growth
Pay for your parent’s medical insurance – health care improves
Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean – or else
Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+ including the folks who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.
If we’re going to re-distribute wealth let’s really do it…instead of trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( “vote buy” ) economic incentive that is being proposed by one of our candidates for President.
If we’re going to do an $85 billion bailout, let’s bail out every adult U S Citizen 18+!
As for AIG – liquidate it.
Sell off its parts.
Let American General go back to being American General.
Sell off the real estate.
Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.
Here’s my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn’t.
Sure it’s a crazy idea that can “never work.”
But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party!
How do you spell Economic Boom?
I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion ‘We Deserve It Dividend’ more than I do the geniuses at AIG or in Washington DC.
And remember, The Birk plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5 Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam.
Ahhh…I feel so much better getting that off my chest.
Kindest personal regards,
Birk
T. J. Birkenmeier, A Creative Guy & Citizen of the Republic
PS: Feel free to pass this along to your pals as it’s either good for a laugh or a tear or a very sobering thought on how to best use $85 Billion!!

Posted by: tryingtosurviveinmiddleclass | September 30, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

I oppose the bailout. We should use that $700 Billion to begin rebuilding our nation’s bridges and other failing infrastructure. Give more Americans paying jobs so they can pay their bills and let those in the credit industry who made poor decisions bail themselves out!

Posted by: Sunshine | September 30, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

The interview with Marci and Maryilyn was right on…we need a different bill. The 700 billion dollar bill was not the answer. The two lady members of congress you interviewed had the answer. Instead of you,GMA, focusing on the bill not passing and how awful that is why are you not focusing on the different alternatives. Shame on you GMA you usually are better than this.

Posted by: Barbara | September 30, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

One change in the bailout bill I understand the oppositon would like to see – both Republicans and Democrats – is the use of mark-to-market accounting so that it will free up inter-bank lending and so these bad assets can be more accurately valued. I think these “unique” and so called “innovative” accounting methods are part of what got the financial markets into this mess along with hedge funds and derivatives. Where valuations are based on models, estimations, assumptions and basically jargon and conjured up figures often resulting in scrupulous activities and fraud. Isn’t this what has already happened here?!! They should be careful in what they ask for …. didn’t Enron teach us anything?!!???

Posted by: Kap | September 30, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

This idea of giving people $425,000 is obviously coming from someone who has NEVER TAKEN AN ECONOMICS COURSE!
Inflation inflation inflation!
You would be better off disconnecting your utilities and burning the cash for heat.
Hmm, how very German.

Posted by: Ryan | September 30, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Why are we bailing out these rich arrognat mofos?? They are just waiting for the bill to pass so they can pull the rip cord on that golden parachute.
HERE IS A BETTER IDEA!
WHY DON’T WE USE THIS 700 BILLION DOLLARS TO PAY OFF THE MORTGAGES OF MIDDLE CLASS AMERICAN?? THE BANKS WILL GET PAID AND THIS WILL PUT MANY AMERICANS ON BETTER FINANCIAL FOOTING.
George Bush…this is another fine mess you have gotten us into screw Wall St. and help Main St. for a change!!
mck

Posted by: motorcity kid | September 30, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Marci and Marilyn…. thank you for the courage to actually represent the American people. I cannot understand why anyone expects the American people to sit still for the kind of financial nonsense represented by this bill in the form in which it was rightfully shot down! And Chris, you looked more like a garden variety politician today than a journalist.

Posted by: Gayle | September 30, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Seriously, you want to give a trillion dollars to whom???? For what…..business as usual? The average American taxpayer who probably cannot even comprehend this mess is expected to pay for it? I am quite sure this is in the minds and hearts of those lawmakers who voted against this absurd bill. The correct bill is one which protects the victims of this foolishness as their level. Wall Street and Company didn’t get it right the first time… do we really think that they will do right by the money if we just give it all back to them???

Posted by: SICK and TIRED and MAD | September 30, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

The neo-cons are running scared now, so they spew their nonsense about the “Democratic controlled Congress”.
The Dems hold more seats in Congress, this is true.
However, the Dems cannot “control” Congress until they have 60 seats, the required number to break the filibuster.
The GOP (Grand Obstructionist Party) has racked up a record number of bill-killing filibusters; read about it here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/02/weekinreview/02herszenhorn.html
Now – who is really doing nothing in Congress?
Educate yourselves with the facts – don’t just repeat political talking points.

Posted by: dogman | September 30, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

I AM SO SICK OF PEOPLE NOT UNDERSTANDING HOW THIS MESS STARTED IN THE FIRST PLACE. This started because of the Fannie & Freddie mess and because DEMOCRATS would not regulate these companies and Dems basically leaned on banks to loan money to people who could not afford it. Before any more money is handed out, the American people would like to see the problem dealt with first.

Posted by: Kim | September 30, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Nancy Pelosi is Speaker of the House, not Majority Leader. She is 3rd in line to the president. She has the responsibility to lead the House and get legislation through. She came up 12 votes short with 95 members of her own caucus voting against her. This is a failure of leadership and Pelosi must be held accountable.

Posted by: Mike | September 30, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Apparently some of you think it’s more important to find someone to blame than work intelligently on a solution.
When the corporate credit freeze hits home and takes out the entire retail sector, then you’ll realize what is at stake here.
I actually took the time to read large sections of the 110 page bill.
Have you?
Educate yourselves and don’t just repeat the talking points – try and understand what is truly at stake here.

Posted by: dogman | September 30, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

As a life long Democrat I am appalled by the lack of leadership, campaign for Obama and the partisan tone of Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s pre-vote speech on the House floor. Democrats, with a 31-seat majority, could get 95 of their own to vote for the bailout with leadership …. The American People are not stupid Pelosi and Reid are part of the problem in Washington!!!!! I will vote for REFORM I will vote McCain.

Posted by: Murphy | September 30, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

>>Democrats, with a 31-seat majority, >>could get 95 of their own to vote for >>the bailout with leadership ….
Spin much?
Care to tell these people how few repubs voted for the bill?
Care to tell these people how many of those no votes come from reps that are in danger of losing their seat in the house?
Care to explain to everyone how McCain failed to persuade his own party to vote for a Bill that he publicly supports?

Posted by: dogman | September 30, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

There is a fifth option: Do nothing!

Posted by: Jim | September 30, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Read about the corporate credit freeze here:
http://money.cnn.com/2008/09/26/markets/bondcenter/treasury_prices/index.htm?postversion=2008092616
Is the bailout plan the solution this freeze, or should the banks be left to figure this out on their own?
The danger of pumping money to prop up overvalued mortgages and securities is the devaluation of the dollar, leading to depression.
Some economists are stating that if the mortgages are purchased for 65 cents on the dollar, and financed at 4% – then the liquidity of the Fed becomes an asset as it basically has all of the time in the world to sit on these assets until the values increase.

Posted by: dogman | September 30, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Here’s an idea. Restore the Republican form of government that is guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. Obviously, Democracy is not working.
1) Restore the Vice President as President of the Senate.
2) Repeal all the illegal laws Congress has passed; Congress has limited powers delegated to them via our Constitution, they have well exceeded those powers.
3) Cut our government dramatically and pay off our debt.
4) Repeal the income tax amendment to reverse the flow of money. Under our Republic, the money is supposed to flow from the people to the states to the federal government, not from the people to the federal government to the states. If the money flowed from the state to the federal government, our representatives would have answer to their own state and explain why they were spending the money of their State. Right now our representatives are spending the money of the other 49 states and only answer to their state if they don’t bring enough back to their state, causing more spending.
Just a few things I would start with.

Posted by: Theresa Jones | September 30, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Too bad coming up with a decent bill isn’t on the agenda.

Posted by: shargash | September 30, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Vote No, to the $700 Billion bailout! Only person’s the bailout will help is the Rich, and the Republicans

Posted by: Demo Rules | September 30, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Don’t know if this is viable or not, but here is an idea.
Take the $700 Billion and divide it by all the adults in America and use that money to pay off that much of each persons bills (student loans, credit cards, house loans, etc.) Someone said it would be $400,000 per person, don’t know if that is accurate, but boy that would surely help. The money would go straight to the institutions to clear each persons debt and they could start over.

Posted by: Paula | September 30, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

It’s frustrating to us with commen sense and conservative values. There should be a whole new plan to consider that is NOT a bailout. Smart economists say don’t waste taxpayer money on the bailout – instead, eliminate the programs that caused this mess to begin with. It’s cheaper and a faster way to fix this problem. Banks should only be lending money to people who can afford to pay it back. This isn’t rocket science.

Posted by: Laura | September 30, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

WTH did Pillowski provoke the Republicans prior to the vote ?
She is the worst speaker of the history of all times
They have accomplished almost nothing in 2008

Posted by: OhDrama - Pillowski | September 30, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

The banks are claiming that the foreclosures of the housing created their problem, but was it not the very banks that kicked out the buyers from whom they were profiting that could not afford the increase cost of their loan, thereby cutting their own throat. The buyers were willing and able for the most part to pay for the loan at its original price and interest, But the banks got greedy and made it impossible for the buyer to pay the increase cost of the loan.
Instead of kicking the buyers out, why could they not re-negotiate a loan that keeps all buyers in the home thereby profiting all, this would prevent most loan defaults! The banks may not make the high profits they anticipated, but still a healthy profit, and we the tax payer would not need to fork over the huge ungodly sum of 700 billions dollar, that some are saying will not bail out the home owners anyway and only help wall street.

Posted by: Richard Lieber | September 30, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

His friends …
Rev Wright
Tony Rezko
Michelle Obama
Louis Farrakhan
William Ayres
Bernadine Dorhn
Rashid Khalidi
Nadhmi Auchi
Frank Marshall Davis
Saul Alinsky
Father Pfleger
Kwame Kilpatrick
Rev Meeks
George Soros
Raila Odingo
Abongo Obama
Black Panthers
Ludacris
Ahmad Yousuf (Hamas)
Fidel, Raul Castro
Hugo Chavez
Daniel Ortega
Kim Jong Il
Voting record …
- Voted AGAINST a bill letting people argue self-defense in court if charged with violating local weapons bans by using a gun in their home in self-defense.
- Unsuccessfully sponsored measure to expunge some criminal records and create an employment grant program for ex-criminals.
- Voted AGAINST making gang members eligible for the death penalty if they kill someone to help their gang.
- Voted AGAINST giving tax credits to parents who send their children to private school.
- Voted NO on a bill to give no offer of “good time” for sex offenders sentenced to the County Jail –
Obama was the only vote against the bill.
- Voted “Present”on a bill to restrict the location of buildings with adult uses (you know porn shop, strip clubs, etc…) within 1,000 feet of any public or private elementary or secondary school, public park, place of worship, preschool, day-car facility, or residential area.
- Voted NO on a bill, requiring school boards to install software on public computers accessible to minors that blocked sexually explicit material.
- Voted YES on a bill that allowed the purchase of 10 hyperdemic needles from a pharmacy without a prescription.
- Voted “Present” on a bill which established a zero-tolerance drug-testing policy for Dep’t. of Corrections Employees.
- Voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
Top Recipients of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Campaign Contributions:
1. Dodd, Christopher D-CT $165,400
2. Obama, Barack D-IL $126,349
3. Kerry, John D-MA $111,000
Early days in polictics …
Barack Hussein Obama actively sought and received the stamp of approval of a Marxist third party that operated briefly in Chicago between 1992 and 1998.
The New Party was a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials — most often Democrats. The New Party’s short-term objective was to move the Democratic Party leftward, thereby setting the stage for the eventual rise of new Marxist third party.
Most New Party members hailed from the Democratic Socialists of America and the militant organization ACORN. The party’s Chicago chapter also included a large contingent from the Committees of Correspondence, a Marxist coalition of former Maoists, Trotskyists, and Communist Party USA members.
Obama, the OMEN the world doesnt need !!!

Posted by: NOBAMA | September 30, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

tryingtosurviveinmiddleclass, who posted the $425,000 per person piece not only skipped ECON as Ryan suggests, but failedtosurviveinMATHclass as well.
$85,000,000,000/200,000,000 = $425.
Not $425,000.

Posted by: NoChildLeft | September 30, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I noticed that infoseeking is similarly mathematically challenged.
$750 billion/200 million = $3,750.
Not $375,000.
At least infoseeking was only off by a factor of 100.
Given that public schools aren’t able to teach basic math, I suppose it’s too much to ask them to teach Austrian Economics.

Posted by: NoChildLeft | September 30, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

We have a FREE MARKET and commoditiy prices rise and fall because f supply and demand. The government needs to stay out of it. Thieves made the housing crisis and it will correct itself and rid us of all of the theives.We need to do nothing. There shpuld be intelligent people running banks and realestate companies. God is not making any more land so they have an IDEAL situation. It will give the honest people something to work on.Taxpayer money is not needed to ail them out. Get to work American – fix it.

Posted by: Don Reagan | September 30, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Fact: Republicans have controlled the Executive Branch for the past 8 years. FACT: Republicans have controlled Congress 10 of the past 12 years. FACT: Republicans are responsible for an unnecessary war in Iraq that has killed 4,733 of our greatest resource, our young people. FACT: Republicans OWN the economic crisis that came under their watch. FACT: Republicans are the free market party that champions NO REGULATION. FACT: corporated lobbyists have infiltrated the Republican party and have been ripping off our Treasury with unncessary spending projects. FACT: every spending bill over the past 8 years has been signed by a Republican. FACT: the Republicans took and multi-billion dollar budget surplus and turned into a deficit and sold American taxpayers down the river on behalf of the Chinese. Dump the Republican party before it dumps your job, your retirement plan, and your social security account. This year vote Democratic.

Posted by: Steve from Danville | September 30, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Dear Mr. President:
Now that the financial services package is back to the negotiation stage, I wanted to suggest several unilateral steps that could be taken by you to address the root causes of the financial panic. In order to make this bailout the last one, there are several necessary steps that should be taken by the Executive Branch:
1. Repeal the Clinton-era regulations encouraging reckless lending practices under the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). In the 1990s, the Clinton Administration used the CRA as a club to pressure lenders into giving loans to marginally-qualified borrowers. The government should not be in the business of pushing lenders into making loans they would not make in a free market
2. Direct the SEC to make mark-to-market accounting voluntary for distressed assets. The mark-to-market accounting regime forces companies to value assets at less than their intrinsic value, merely to reflect current market uncertainty. In order to contain the bailout and protect taxpayer dollars, companies should be able to use book accounting for assets deemed by the Treasury as “distressed”
3. Direct the Treasury Secretary to determine that capital basis can be adjusted for inflation by taxpayers. There is a body of legal thought which holds that the Treasury Department can do this by executive action. In order to free up needed capital and unlock frozen assets more easily, the Treasury should make this common sense change to tax rules. If there is a legal brief which details Treasury’s objections to capital basis indexation, it should be released for public dissemination.
It’s important to note that all these actions can be done unilaterally by the Executive Branch. There are other reforms which require legislative action (note especially the House Republican Study Committee package), but the above executive steps would do much to alleviate the panic, assure markets, and protect taxpayers.

Posted by: glc | September 30, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

Michelle Malkin wrote today:
Fannie, Freddie get federal grand jury subpoenas.
The crony pseudocapitalists at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have been served federal grand jury subpoenas. Better late than never:
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the U.S. mortgage finance giants that were taken over by the government this month, said on Monday they were subpoenaed for documents as part of a federal grand jury investigations into their accounting.
The U.S. Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York subpoenaed the two on Friday for documents related to accounting, disclosure and corporate governance dating from January 1, 2007 to the present.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is also investigating these matters and directing the companies to preserve the documents…
How about serving Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, Gregory Meeks, and company while they’re at it?

Posted by: glc | September 30, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Folks,
When the federal government announced two months ago that it would prop up mortgage buyers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, CRP looked at how much money members of Congress had collected since 1989 from the companies. On Sunday the government completely took over the two government-sponsored enterprises, and we’ve returned to our data to bring you the updates, this time providing a list of all 354 lawmakers who have gotten money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (in July we posted the top 25). These totals are based on data released electronically from the FEC on Sept. 2 and include contributions to lawmakers’ leadership PACs and candidate committees from the floundering companies’ PACs and employees. Current members of Congress have received a total of $4.8 million from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with Democrats collecting 57 percent of that. This week we also wrote about how much money lawmakers had invested of their own money in the companies last year–a total of up to $1.7 million.
The two folks who got the most money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were:
Chris Dodd: $165,4000
Barack Obama: $126,349
Wow.
That’s a lot of CASH.

Posted by: glc | September 30, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Now that the federal government has bailed out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from their impending financial doom, Congress has an even greater interest in seeing the giant mortgage buyers succeed–some lawmakers perhaps more than others. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, 28 lawmakers had between $598,100 and $1.7 million of their own money invested in the two companies last year.
Of them, 12 members of Congress owned between $60,800 and $246,700 of stock in the two companies, which is practically worthless now that the government has seized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to keep them afloat as more of their customers default on their mortgages. Other lawmakers, however, have investments that are still of value. Seventeen members of Congress reported holding bonds in at least one of the companies, which are protected, in 2007, worth between $537,400 and $1.5 million. (Lawmakers disclose their finances in ranges, annually, making it difficult to determine their assets’ precise values.) Rep. Mary Bono (R-Calif.) held bonds in the companies worth between $126,050 and $365,000, making her investments in Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae more valuable than those of any other member of congress.
Four members of either the House Financial Services Committee or the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee were invested in these companies: Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), who held $32,216 in bonds; Sen. Mike Enzi (R-Wyo.), who held at least $2,002 in bonds; Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), with at least $2,002 in stocks; and Rep. Ron Klein (D-Fla.), who held at least $1,001 in bonds.
Republican presidential candidate John McCain, who called the federal bailout “outrageous” (but necessary), also reported having up to $10,000 invested in the two companies–up to $9,000 worth in bonds and up to $1,000 worth of stocks.
The 2007 reports are the most recent available for Congress, and they represent snapshots of members’ finances at the end of that year. Lawmakers who were invested in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac may have sold off those investments in the last eight months, as the mortgage market went further south and the outlook for the two companies darkened. In addition, CRP does not yet have the personal financial disclosure data for about 50 lawmakers who received extensions on the annual reports.
Investing in Fannie and Freddie: These members of Congress held stock or owned bonds in the giant mortgage buyers in 2007.
Mary Bono – $365,000
Tim Johnson – $250,000
Jim McDermott – $70,108
Pete Sessions – $100,000
Claire McCaskill – $150,000
Thad Cochran – $160,000
Caroln McCarthy – $32,216
Dave Hobson – $100,000
Rodney Frelinghuysen -$50,000
Jeff Sessios – $50,000
John Tanner – $50,000
Fred Upton – $50,000
Vernon Buchanan – $50,000
John Warner – $13,628
Jon Kyl – $9,088
Charles Schumer – $30,000
Mike Enzi – $30,000
Jo Bonner – $30,000
Anthony Weiner – $15,000
Dave Weldon – $15,000
Jim Ramstad – $15,000
Ken Conrad – $15,000
Eric Cantor – $15,000
Charles Melancon – $15,000
Ron Klein – $15,000
Ben Nelson – $1,000
John McCain – $10,000
Jeff Bingaman – $3,000
(I have given the maximum values above.)

Posted by: glc | September 30, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

Doesn’t anyone care that this is ILLEGAL? According to the Constitution (does anyone remember this document?), Article I, Section 7, only the House can originate an appropriations (financial) bill, never the Senate!

Posted by: Adrian | September 30, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Did anyone see the sequel to the movie “Plan 9 From Outer Space”? In “Plan 10 From Outer Space” the space aliens replace members of the U.S. congress with dead people who have been resurrected with the use of long distance electrodes shot into the pineal and pituitary gland. They register to vote in Colorado, Missouri, Washington State, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, and Florida using the services of A.C.O.R.N. The zombies then take their seats on Capitol Hill and within a few weeks their approval ratings surpass those of President Bush.
If you want to see some of the quotes from the movie, which make more sense than what you are getting from our current congress, go to.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0052077/quotes

Posted by: Paul | September 30, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Pennies to People and Billions to Bankers. No more bailouts please. Economy needs to get real. With these artificial maneuvers, future generations will be exposed to great risks and lack of morals.

Posted by: Peter | September 30, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

The reality is that, this administration is using the same “scare” tactics it used in 911 and will continue to use to manipulate the “lay” people into doing what they want. ‘Lions and Tigers and Bears oh My.’ Wizard of OZ [World of Babbling Idiots] If Wall Street is so financially savvy why couldn’t they figure out that the creative financing they were peddling (i.e., CDO, CMBS, etc) was going to blow up in their/our faces – financial geniuses — yeah right!!!
Those idiots on Wall Street already robbed the American people with the fees charged during the subprime underwriting greed fest and now they want us to give them more $$$. I think not, they should simply rewrite the loans to reflect the real appraised value versus the inflated values that increased the points (inflated fees) they received when underwriting the loan. That way foreclosures would be taken off the books and they (Banks) would be able to lend on the monies that are currently tied up (frozen) in non-performing assets.
Let’s clean up the mess where it started instead of giving the idiots in Washington the okay to give the idiots on Wall Street more of our $$$. Unfortunately, this fiasco, is a nasty reality check, that the era of credit has manifested a nightmare – meaning don’t buy what you can’t afford (period).
So much for “family values” — how dare you use family values as a political strategy when you’re allowing the families of American citizens to be thrown in the street, shelters, etc.
Let Babylon Fall…

Posted by: EM | September 30, 2008, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Why wouldn’t this work? This seems to be the better alternative to giving money to the people who created the problem in the first place….
The Birk Economic Recovery PLan
Hi Pals,
I’m against the $85,000,000,000.00 bailout of AIG.
Instead, I’m in favor of giving $85,000,000,000 to America in
a We Deserve It Dividend.
To make the math simple, let’s assume there are 200,000,000
bonafide U.S. Citizens 18+.
Our population is about 301,000,000 +/- counting every man, woman
and child. So 200,000,000 might be a fair stab at adults 18 and up..
So divide 200 million adults 18+ into $85 billon that equals $425,000.00.
My plan is to give $425,000 to every person 18+ as a
We Deserve It Dividend.
Of course, it would NOT be tax free. So let’s assume a tax rate of 30%.
Every individual 18+ has to pay $127,500.00 in taxes. That sends $25,500,000,000 right back to Uncle Sam.
But it means that every adult 18+ has $297,500.00 in their pocket.
A hu sband and wife has $595,000.00.
What would you do with $297,500.00 to $595,000.00 in your family?
Pay off your mortgage – housing crisis solved.
Repay college loans – what a great boost to new grads
Put away money for college – it’ll be there
Save in a bank – create money to loan to entrepreneurs.
Buy a new car – create jobs
Invest in the market – capital drives growth
Pay for your parent’s medical insurance – health care improves
Enable Deadbeat Dads to come clean – or else
Remember this is for every adult U S Citizen 18+ including the folks
who lost their jobs at Lehman Brothers and every other company
that is cutting back. And of course, for those serving in our Armed Forces.
If we’re going to re-distribute wealth let’s really do it…instead of trickling out a puny $1000.00 ( “vote buy” ) economic incentive that is being proposed by one of our candidates for President.
If we’re going to do an $85 billion ba ilout, let’s bail out every adult U S Citizen 18+!
As for AIG – liquidate it.
Sell off its parts.
Let American General go back to being American General.
Sell off the real estate.
Let the private sector bargain hunters cut it up and clean it up.
Here’s my rationale. We deserve it and AIG doesn’t.
Sure it’s a crazy idea that can “never work.”
But can you imagine the Coast-To-Coast Block Party!
How do you spell Economic Boom?
I trust my fellow adult Americans to know how to use the $85 Billion
We Deserve It Dividend more than the geniuses at AIG or in Washington DC.
And remember, The Birk plan only really costs $59.5 Billion because $25.5 Billion is returned instantly in taxes to Uncle Sam.
Ahhh…I feel so much better getting that off my chest.
Kindest personal regards,
Birk
T. J. Birkenmeier, A Creative Guy & Citizen of the Republic

Posted by: Roni | September 30, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

I am completely against the buy-out. I do not want my tax dollars being spent in this way. I believe a lot of other Americans feel this way, as well. There is no reason that I should pay for the mistakes of these high-rollers who have blown their businesses on making bad choices.

Posted by: Cathy Taff | October 1, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

CONS AND LIBS UNITED AGAINST ARROGANT GOVERNMENT, GUESS WHAT? AFTER WE SAID NO, CONGRESS IS POISED TO TRY AGAIN WEDNESDAY and vote to give the Executive Branch of government, and specifically the White House’s political appointees in the Treasury Department, the absolute right to take our money and give it to domestic and foreign banks and corporations without any oversight of elected officials, from the courts, or from the people.
The new legislation states: “Decisions by the Secretary [of the Treasury] pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, AND MAY NOT BE REVIEWED BY ANY COURT OF LAW OR ANY ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY.” The Legislation allows the Treasury Department to appoint the same bankers who created the crisis to administer and dictate the use of trillions of our tax dollars.
The new system institutionalizes theft on a grand scale. Lehman Brothers bankers will receive $2.5 billion in bonuses after their company went bankrupt last week, but the new dictatorial authority under the White House and Treasury Department has ruled out any relief for the millions of working families who are being foreclosed.
We live in a $15 trillion annual economy. Instead of taking our tax dollars and giving it to the already rich and powerful, these funds should be used provide to decent paying jobs, affordable housing, health care and a good education for our children. There is another way!
Now is the time to hear the voice of the people. A spineless Congress authorized Bush’s illegal war in Iraq and rubber-stamped the Patriot Act. Now they are being herded like sheep again to give the White House and Wall Street dictatorial control over the people’s money.
SEND A LETTER TO YOUR CONGRESSIONAL REPRESENTATIVES AT THE FOLLOWING LINK:____
https://secure2.convio.net/pepib/site/Advocacy?JServSessionIdr001=rwz849uu63.app7b&cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=123

Posted by: allen_osuno3 | October 1, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am

‘I would like to see Palin debate with someone on her own level, like Kelly Pickler.

Posted by: Richard | October 6, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.