By Natalie Gewargis

Sep 26, 2008 3:16pm

Tactics v Strategy

Former Clinton senior adviser Howard Wolfson blogs about a criticism of the McCain campaign that I repeat here because a very high-ranking former Republican official said something very similar to me the other day: that the McCain campaign is obsessed with tactics — not strategy. The campaign is focused on winning the news cycle — not having a larger consistent message.

To wit: one minute the McCain campaign is calling Hillary Clinton an American hero, the next, they’re tarring her as a partisan.

One minute they’re saying Barack Obama is naive and inexperienced and a minor player on Capitol Hill, the next they’re picking Palin as VP and blaming Obama for the energy crisis and the breakdown of the bailout talks.

Writes Wolfson: "John McCain’s reversal of his pledge not to attend tonight’s debate, unless there was an agreement on a Wall Street bailout, illustrates the dangers of chasing news cycles. McCain’s decision to suspend campaigning must have seemed like a good idea at the time — his poll numbers were falling and his campaign was getting hammered by the press for its lobbying ties. The move was guaranteed to dominate the headlines, change the discussion, and in so doing, ‘win the day.’ And it did. But then the next news cycle began, and Sen. McCain was boxed in by his pledge. … Now, forced to choose between ducking the debate or breaking his promise not to attend, absent a deal, he has decided to go back on his word."

Wolfson calls this "the difference between strategy and tactics, between a message and a war room…"

Any Republicans out there concerned about this? Or do you disagree?

- jpt

User Comments

Obama was against FISA. Obama was for FISA. Obama was against offshore drilling. Obama is for offshore drilling. Obama said Ayers was just a neighbor. Ayers was a business colleague. Obama said Reverend Wright was his spiritual mentor. Obama said he never heard Wright da** America when the tapes were on sale in the lobby of his church.
The list is endless.
Spy vs Spy. It must be getting tough to find blog topics, JT.

Posted by: len | September 26, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

I think they wanted to try to bury the two-night Katie Couric interviews with Sarah Palin, too.

Posted by: Blue in Michigan | September 26, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

McCain believes because his family was well-to-do that he is entitled to the presidency. This has been his attitude all his life. He doesn’t care about anything else except himself, that’s why he picked a total idiot as his running mate because it would help him with the base and women voters. Luckily people have finally caught on. The last thing this country needs is another spoiled brat who doesn’t have a clue how to run things as President.

Posted by: TheRealMcCain | September 26, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Obama’s strategy of “change” is vague and is predicated on attacking Republicans and President Bush. McCain’s central message is one everyone knows as he’s been a key player in things like the surge and campaign finance reform. Obama also has the mainstream media fawning over him, sucking up to him and framing their reporting in order to help the Democratic candidate. If McCain didn’t take risks in his campaign, he wouldn’t get as much media attention.

Posted by: Lyndsi | September 26, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

When you can’t win on issues, you have to come up with these bizarre tactics – picking a VP in over her head, “suspending” the campaign – to try to distract Americans.
After Palin bows out due to “family matters,” the next distraction will be picking Lieberman or Ridge. I hope McCain keeps on being erratic – I actually think this is giving Americans more confidence in Obama to handle the eraticism of say, a Putin, because they see him stay so calm and focused against McCain, who sees the world through his fighter-pilot instincts instead of the rational intelligence of a statesman like Obama.

Posted by: Holly | September 26, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

McCain is just interested in winning an election, he’s proven that to us with his VP pick and trying to postpone the debates. He is just focused on the poll numbers. He looked at the polls this morning and found out that 80 percent of Americans want to see a debate tonight, so he changed his mind. We don’t know where he stands on this bailout, and don’t be surprised if he announces tonight that he’s against the bailout because the poll numbers show that the majority of the people don’t agree with it. So much for country first.

Posted by: Kathy | September 26, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

re: Obama flips – If these things are all true (and I don’t admit that at this point) this is still not the same thing as what Wolfson is writing about.
Obama’s statements are in response to specific issues that come up, not the general message of the campaign. They are potential “gotcha” moments that are initiated external to the campaign.
The McCain campaign is creating its own “gotcha” moments by changing its central message back and forth, and hoping the voters won’t notice it. It is initiated by the campaign – proactive vs. reactive – and connotes a lack of consistent strategy.
A white middle-aged woman in Michigan

Posted by: Elcee | September 26, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

Tactics and strategy are of little concern to the average person. Both terms have roots in military history. Soldiers would understand the distinction but I doubt the general public knows or cares about this kinda of stuff. The bottom line is that people vote for the candidate they like best. McCain is a soldier, Obama is a lawyer. Tough choice.

Posted by: independent | September 26, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

I supported McCain in 2000. I’m not supporting him this year because I left the party after the invasion of Iraq.
But his behavior this week makes me think he is very unstable. I don’t feel reassured, confident, that I can know what he will do from one minute to the next. It’s frightening.

Posted by: cincyr | September 26, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Well said, Holly.

Posted by: Blue in Michigan | September 26, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

One would have to guess that this was a McCain move and not a move his campaign advisors recommended.
It doesn’t say much for his judgment, UNLESS, this is all a pre-cursor to coming out against the bailout (as the House Republicans’ ideas seem like non-starters). Imagine 40 days of McCain running against Bush, Obama, Congress and Wall Street. Oh, and there’s the matter of trying to save the taxpayers $700,000,000,000.
Seems like a winning issue to me.

Posted by: Roger | September 26, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

This election is over. I know everyone in the media wants to pretend it’s really close so ppl will stay pay attention – but IT IS OVER. Obama is winning all Kerry states (except NH), Iowa, NM and CO. That’s a tie in electoral college with means Obama is POTUS. The true tossups are IN, NC, OH, FL, NV, NH and maybe VA although is is leaning Obama. Obama can lose all these tossups and still be POTUS. Does anyone out there really think Obama is going to lose PA, MI, WI or MN?

Posted by: Rebecca | September 26, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

With the press 100% in the bag for Obama, McCain has to do things a bit differently to catch some press.
If the press was doing their job, reporting objectively and fairly, investigating Obama’s past(such as did Bill Ayers & Co. select and groom Obama in the 1980s – get Obama into the Chicago community organizer system, get Obama into Harvard, put him in politics in Chicago in order to use him later politically), then it would be a different race.
McCain is trying to adapt to an election where the media is totally in support of getting Obama elected and against McCain.

Posted by: Zank | September 26, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Well, I;m not a Republican, but I am a Hillary Clinton supporter and am supporting John McCain. Here are my thoughts on all this. And it will be people like me, Hillary supporters, and Independents that decide this election.
I think the entire premise of Jake’s article here is misguided, to say the least.
The reality of all this is that John McCain is putting his country first to help make certain that both sides have a seat at the table and that the best Bill is passed to best help the economy AND the American people.
FACT: Most Americans do NOT want the huge bailout.
The fact that the Democrats want money to go to ACORN, a corrupt and fraudulent organization that is in the backpocket of Obama, is further proof that the “agreement” was no agreement at all this week. Republicans would never agree to giving that corrupt organization a dime.
Both candidates are on record as saynig this economic crisis is the worst since the Great Depression.
McCain’s decision to temporarily suspend his campaign and return to Washington this week to help bring a deal together, when there was no deal to begin with (statements that there was a deal in palce is a bold face lie), proves that putting ocuntry first is not just a slogan for John McCain, it is his core value in life.
Obama just wanted to phone it in. he was brought back to Washington kicking and screaming. Obama showed no leadership, and Obama’s hijacking of the White House meeting (which BTYW jake, you continue to refue to report on) showed Obama for what he truly is, inexperienced with no clue what to do.
The debate will go one tonight. I think Mccain did the right thing.
Why won’t the Democrats jsut pass any bill they want to? They have the votes to do it, yet they are tucking their collective tail between their legs and cring in the corner because McCain is standing up for the American taxpayer. Obama is just talking.
America will see it in prime-time tonight that McCain is the leader and Obama is the follower.
Obama’s refusal to act and do anything is very telling about hwere his priorities are – For Obama, it’s all about Obama.
For McCain, it is about putting country first. Something Obama has never done.

Posted by: USVet | September 26, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Roger, you assume that the market won’t crash in the mean time. If that happens, *everyone* is going to throw McCain under the bus. Republicans who are up for re-election won’t hesitate. Better to lose the presidency for 4 years than have a veto-proof senate.

Posted by: johnTX | September 26, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

Both camps are running a campaign to get elected president. The main reason McCain is taking heat for his campaign is because it is failing. If he goes up in the polls again, he will look good. Just like the difference between Karl Rove being a genius verus an idiot was a badly laid out ballot in a single Florida county and easily confused seniors.
It’s about results, and Obama’s campaign is showing more of them (as it did when it shockingly took down the pretty impressive Clinton machine).

Posted by: jhw539 | September 26, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

There is no tactics here or a strategy. McCain is a like a spoiled little boy who believes all the toys are for him. That kind of behaviour is a lack of maturity or the begining of dementia.

Posted by: BKMC | September 26, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

McCain doesn’t have answers. He’s going to the debate to blame Obama for everything–just like McCain’s previously done on the campaign trail. McCain will ignore his 26 years in Washington, will forget all the times he’s told Obama he hasn’t been around enough, and then will lay this entire crisis at Obama’s (and the Dems) feet. This is despite the fact that the GOP controlled the White House and Congress for years and never put in any regulations that would prevent this meltdown! America–watch out for the okey-doke!!

Posted by: beck | September 26, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

I think the bigger problem has been the “gesture too far”.
Last week, he had a big speech where he tried to tell the American people how we had gotten to this point in the economy. He had some strong language about mortgages, Freddie and Fannie, and Obama’s cozy relationship with Freddie and Fannie.
He also had a brief comment about holding SEC Chairman Cox accountable.
The Cox comment made the news, the other language didn’t.
In regards to suspending the campaign, he should not have tied it to the debate. Instead, he should have said he was suspending the campaign, planned on the debate, but that if bail out negotiations required, he would look at postponeing the debate.
Now it looks like he has changed his mind, and his message is, again, mixed.

Posted by: cdm | September 26, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Wolfson found some pretty sounding euphemisms for a basic fact: the only reliable factor in the McCain campaign is panic. There’s nothing presidential about it all; see the Palin pick indeed and the extreme flip-flopping this week on every issue connected to the economic crisis. And the week ends with the major lie of ‘suspending’ the campaign, plus the major flip-flop on the presidential debate. It’s panicking and having no clue, nothing more than that.

Posted by: greg | September 26, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

johnTX,
My assumption is the bailout passes with most Dems and moderate Republican support. Pelosi has the votes already and Reid should be able to get enough Reps to get to 60 if needed.
Could be the best of both worlds for McCain, politically speaking.

Posted by: Roger | September 26, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

McCain has been a loser
in presidential politics
for almost a decade. He
will be handed a defeat
once again in a little
over a month.

Posted by: anon | September 26, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

This sounds very much like Craig Shirley the GOP consultant. Here is what he said to the Huffington Post.
“In the end, [McCain] blinked and Obama did not. The ‘steady hand in a storm’ argument looks now to more favor Obama, not McCain…My guess is that plasma units are rushing to the McCain campaign as we speak to replace the blood flowing there from the fights among the staff.” – Craig Shirley.
Still I think the McCain campaign is very lucky that almost no one was listening when Sarah Palin was ranting on CBS, repeating talking points without thinking. Otherwise, this would have been the week when they lost this election.

Posted by: Lance D. | September 26, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm

I can tell you what I think about it!
This is great news for McCain!
He’s just being a maverick. Kind of like when your husband freaks out and throw you out of the house, throws all your belongings in the street… and then decide ten minutes later… hey, wait a second, these pancakes are really good.
And then he calls you on the cell phone and apologizes. And says, “Hey baby, I’m sorry I said your pancakes stink. Why don’t you come back home?”
It’s mavericky. America loves a maverick. Because Mavericks are is funny and unpredictable. And though they hurt you sometimes, that’s part of their charm.
I can think of nothing better in these uncertain times… than an alpha-male with a short temper, who can change his moods on a dime. That will fix our economy. That will fix our image in the world.

Posted by: Blip | September 26, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

That Wolfson fellow sure seems to know the inside outs of losing campaigns. Where’d he learn all that stuff?

Posted by: ricky | September 26, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

McCain is a soldier, Obama is a lawyer. Tough choice.
Posted by: independent | Sep 26, 2008 3:31:45 PM
****************************************** Not a tough choice for me, I believe the honest, intelligent, disciplined candidate will help lead this country in a better direction while encouraging engagement and committment from the American People.
I don’t have anything against soldiers, but what good is it really going to do our country to have a gambling Drama Queen setting the course?
I know Mccain had been the media darling for years and he worked hard to cultivate the ‘mavarick’ label, and I’ve seen it on camera, but looking for actual results, behind the scenes, I don’t see it. And now I’m even wondering if he ever was an honorable man.

Posted by: Truth Matters | September 26, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm

“tough choice for me, I believe the honest, intelligent, disciplined candidate will help lead this country in a better direction while encouraging engagement and committment from the American People.

well, that leaves out Obama.

Posted by: trettione | September 26, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

What’s wrong with using postcards for voter IDs.
That’s what I did in my state?
I got sent a card. I brought it down to my polling place. I voted.
Is this like some kind of conspiracy thing? I thought that most states didn’t require voters to show ID. Mainly because lots of senior citizens don’t have photo IDs.
It doesn’t seem nefarious for a lawyer to protect senior citizens.

Posted by: Blip | September 26, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

McCain should be flogged for what he has done to Sarah Palin
She may need PTSD therapy after the election

Posted by: watching | September 26, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

The last time McCain got shot down over a national capitol somebody else ordered him to go there.

Posted by: ricky | September 26, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

What is ACORN? And please don’t tell me that it is some corrupt organization that supports Obama or vice versa. As if that would ever get passed on this bail out by either party!!! Come on, be realistic. And I am so tired of hearing about Obama’s past, about his associations with Ayers, and how he was able to get so far in politics because he was set up by his nefarious associates to take over this country, etc. etc. Stop the nonsense. If you know something sinister that is going on, then you need to report it to the proper authorities, like the CIA, FBI, Homeland Security, some organization with clout, not the main stream media. They are just looking for a story, sometimes whether it is true or not. You mean to tell me that after all this time, these “intelligence” organizations haven’t been able to come up with anything concrete based on these flimsy innuendoes and spurious aspersions? Then, maybe it’s because you’re just full of crap and can’t think of anything else to say to smear Obama than to throw baseless rumors at him. Otherwise, what other conclusion can we reach. These organizations don’t care about the future of this country, is that it? They are unpatriotic? Just why haven’t they come up with anything yet? Because it’s a whole lot of b.s. that’s why.

Posted by: geecee | September 26, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

@ USVet
You are misinformed. Dodd’s proposal, sec. 5, states that 20% of the profits “realized on the sale of each troubled asset” should go to the Housing Trust Fund and the Capital Magnet Fund. The rest would go back into the general fund of the Treasury.
You cannot equate these two funds with ACORN.
You are just repeating what all the conservative blogs are writing about today after Sen. Graham yesterday said this to Greta van Susteren.

Posted by: cincyr | September 26, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

McCain wants to go into history books that he was one of the US Presidents.
He has nothing in his mind more than this.

Posted by: FM | September 26, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

War rooms tend to win.

Posted by: s.b. | September 26, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

They are doing everything possible to keep the story away from Palin.
Her interviews left most of us thinking we would be a better VP than she is.

Posted by: Dan | September 26, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

All the haters (obama supporters) are out in droves. We are literally being threatened with violence, riots in the streets and guilt trips if obama isn’t elected?
It’s pathetic. Obama is nothing but DRAMA…McCain is a real man.

Posted by: ML | September 26, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, admitting that until recently she was a vocal supporter of Sarah Palin, now says the vice presidential nominee should bow out:
No one hates saying that more than I do. Like so many women, I’ve been pulling for Palin, wishing her the best, hoping she will perform brilliantly. I’ve also noticed that I watch her interviews with the held breath of an anxious parent, my finger poised over the mute button in case it gets too painful. Unfortunately, it often does. My cringe reflex is exhausted.
Palin filibusters. She repeats words, filling space with deadwood. Cut the verbiage and there’s not much content there.
It’s so bad, Parker says, that Palin should quit the race:
Only Palin can save McCain, her party, and the country she loves. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first.
READY FOR MCCAIN’S NEXT MAGIC TRICK?

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 26, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

jamesbeaufore
there is only one problem with your argument
the facts.
he screwed it up
he didn’t stop his campaigning
he lied to letterman and then used the delay of his campaign as talking point on CBS news and his press conference
Palin has more excerpts from that interviiew coming
the fight was him bridging a gap within the republican party…the dems were already trying to be on the other side of that bridge
it was a republican plan that the dems did not want to do…but the dems work with the other side.
if mcCain can’t get his side to agree amongst themselves but there is already a majority… with the dems …how effective would he be in congress?
especially when he has agreed with Bush 90% of the time.
this is all a joke
Mccain Palin the worst ticket we have seen in our nation’s history.
and everyone knows it…even if they are part of those pissed they are going to lose because of it.

Posted by: dl | September 26, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Conflicting messages…Follow me here people. McCain claims to be country first, okay. He also says Obama isn’t right for the country (the one he puts first). He then says he’s willing to stay in D.C., miss the debate, and if it has political consequences, he’s willing to take that. So he was willing to let Obama win the Presidency, because he puts country first? Letting someone you dont think is qualified to run the country, win the Presidency doesn’t sound like putting country first. So in other words, everything that he did over the past 48 hours, was pure politics. No way America survives with 4 years of this guy…
Obama/Biden

Posted by: PoliticsAsUsual | September 26, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

ACORN? Who started this ACORN rumor? What does the bailout of mortgage financing have to do with a voter-registration organization that you happen not to like?

Posted by: jock59801 | September 26, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Why wouldn’t they focus on message instead of strategy. American voters and our political representatives have shown time and again that the short term message is a stronger incentive than any long term strategic decision. Just look at the many examples – voting Bush in for a second term, voting to go to war in Iraq, almost passing the 700B bailout in only a few days time and no real understanding of the situation, wanting to drill, drill, drill because gas prices are up….. let’s face it, we’re reactive more often than proactive.

Posted by: mhh | September 26, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

USvet Cindycr is right
you are repeating the same lies that bold face liar Lindsey Graham and the rest of these freak conservative republican liars are telling…(the tradition continues…just another lie from the McCain camp…do they have a single fact somewhere…they have gotten so wrapped up in only using lies that I think they lost complete truth …well about 9 years ago)

Posted by: dl | September 26, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

One of the most difficult things to do is confront a liar, and I expect McCain and his people understand this.
I am really surprised how many commenters on this and other articles still believe what McCain says. Like how he was putting country first by running back to Washington to become the insider he is running against, or something like that. How bald faced the lie on 60 Minutes Sunday to say he believes Sarah Palin is ready to be President.
But you (i.e. Obama) can’t directly challenge outright lies like that without looking bad yourself. So McCain and his crowd are going to try to lie themselves into the White House, and, as other commenters have pointed out, blame the Democrats and Obama for everything.
I really hope it is truly the end of the Nixonian approach to politics. I hope the negative ads and scare tactics don’t work any more. And I really hope that the voters will see McCain’s campaign for the pack of lies that it is.

Posted by: Andy2 | September 26, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Uhhh. Did you mean kick? Or has McCain come up with yet another wild twist to his campaign?

Posted by: John from CA | September 26, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

In modeling, a hidden coupler can cause the model to look one way and the results another. (A hidden coupler is a variable not accounted for that affects the outcome strongly.)
What the media polls aren’t accounting for is the role of the media itself. One has to wonder if that disgust factor with the MSM tanking for one candidate will influence the voters much like the Bradley effect.
QUICK!! Run a poll and find out!
I also wonder if the polling is getting into the fatigue noise where people tell the pollster anything just to get off the phone in hopes the circus will be over soon.

Posted by: len | September 26, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

I don’t believe anything McLame or the republicans say anymore. They just want to steal our money.

Posted by: McHooverville | September 26, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I find McCain’s erratic behavior to be scary rather than that of a maverick.
These are not the actions of a President, or someone who will hold the future of our country in his hands.

Posted by: Suzanne | September 26, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Can someone explain whether ACORN and ACORN Housing Corp (across the country) are in fact related?

Posted by: Acorn | September 26, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

It’s clear to me that McCain should not and must not be the next president. McCain lacks the judgement, temperament and more significantly the character to lead. The past two weeks has been very telling. He panicked and was totally out of his depth on the economy and I suspect everythng else.
How he runs his campaign is an indication of how he’ll run the country.
Whatever people think of George W. Bush
at least he’s true to what he believes in. Let history judge him on it but with McCain it’s different. The McCain now seems totally different from the McCain of the past. He’ll do anything and say anything just to become president.

Posted by: pslee | September 26, 2008, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

Actually, the bail-out is a tactic and not a strategy. What comes next if this $700 billion doesn’t do the job, another trillion? I would rather the strategy of putting the money into backing the FDIC and let the bank failures commence. Let the banks that made these bad choices fail along with the borrowers who borrowed beyond their means to repay. Don’t let the system fail and destroy everyone.

Posted by: Javalation | September 26, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Karl Rove and the Republican election machinery are experts at diverting attention from the issues using personality-based stunts and news cycle tactics like what we’ve seen from McCain since the weeks before the convention. Just reading through these posts, there are NO ISSUES being discussed here, just tactics, rumors, and innuendo. Even the left-leaning comments are focused on distractions and not the real platforms of these candidates. What I see in Obama is a candidate who will encourage innovation and technology, get our public schools back into competitive position, and take the money being spent in Iraq now and use it for rebuilding our infrastructure and jump starting the green technology industry. On the other side, there isn’t one long-term economic solution coming from the McCain camp that doesn’t exactly mirror the failed policies of President Bush. No investment in shoring up our economic base, no technology development, no innovation, no teaching our young people the skills needed to be competitive in the global marketplace. Nothin. Tax cuts are great, but they really only help in the short term, and we are officially in a long-term crisis that will need more than the tax-cut band aid.
I’m tired of hearing about the same old recycled divisive non-issues in Washington. This is our LAST CHANCE, people. If we elect another republican administration after the horrific failures of the last 8 years, then we deserve to go down in flames.
Nothing can save an idea whose time has passed. Nothing can stop an idea whose time has come.
Save America’s Future Vote Obama 08

Posted by: fearandterror | September 26, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

“after days of saying that John McCain would not attend Friday’s presidential debate unless an agreement on a bailout package for the markets was “locked-down,” the McCain campaign has gone back on its word.
On Friday, it announced that the Senator would head down to Mississippi even though, as they readily admit, much work remained needed on the bailout agreement.
The whole episode left even conservatives admitting that the McCain campaign looked erratic and a bit foolish with no apparent direction or guiding principle.
“It just proves his campaign is governed by tactics and not ideology,” said Republican consultant Craig Shirley, who advised McCain earlier in this cycle. “In the end, he blinked and Obama did not. The ‘steady hand in a storm’ argument looks now to more favor Obama, not McCain.”
Shirley added, “My guess is that plasma units are rushing to the McCain campaign as we speak to replace the blood flowing there from the fights among the staff.”
Adding to the rocky perception was a McCain campaign web ad released this morning declaring “McCain Wins Debate!” — put out even before the candidate had announced he was planning to debate.”

Posted by: jeru | September 26, 2008, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

the move was titan because the Reps now know the exact feelings and direction the new president will be able to work with when McCain takes over in Jan. The Reps had no way to dictate what McCain could deal with unless they sat down and talked with him and only a fool would lag behind elsewhere calling the leaders names.
The Gov also was able to discuss stuff with McCain before he went to Washington to relay his message so she would be in on the ground floor qwhen she takes over in 2012

Posted by: jim | September 26, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

yes both “acorns” are the same and Barry worked for them.

Posted by: Jim | September 26, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Hello all Dems,
Every one is in deep do do tonight. Rove is a genius, and I would like to play chess with him sometime. This is how things are going to play out.
1 The setup..
Palin not being able to think of how Mccain changed washington one time.
2. Bush announces that we are in time of crisis. We need to do something now.
3. Paulson say he wants unfettered power to spend 700 bln of taxpayers money.
4. The dems don’t want to look bad by not being bipartisan in a time for crisis but doesn’t want to let one person have so much power again after all that has happened in the pass with the patriot act, war ect… The dems think that they have something to go on and start bashing mccain on his economic lack of prowess.
5 Mccain suspends his campaign to go to Washington to do nothing. Spotlight is on him everyone bashing him. Fox news hannity says I’m even believing that mccain is not worth of presidency.. Hannity says the tax payers should not be on the hook what are they doing… Same thing from Mr O’reilly.
6. The people in the US are in an uproar calling their reps and congress folks demanding a no vote on this media sells it.
7. Bush meets with Mccain and Obamma. and some house repubs I think Paul Ryan of MIN(very smart man) He say I think we can do this without putting the taxpayers at risk. Obamma I like to hear more about this.. media is kicked out.
Mccain says nothing…. More drubbing by the media.
8. campaign/Debate must go on. Tonight Mccain is going to bash the dems with saying that He went to Washington and went against the establishment or status quo to change how things were done for you people.. I’m fighting for the american people.. We stalled this thing to make sure legislation wasn’t passed to put the tax payer on the hook for rushed legislation by the dems and bush..
I think this is genius by them but we have time to change the strategy…. There should be people that look into the collusion of bush Paulson and the repubs… This thing is way out of hand when they start messing with not only the us economy but the world economy…
I feel like Nostradamus’s today… I hope I’m wrong but I don’t think I am!!!! James Beaufore… P.S. Send a copy to Mr Rove.. I really would like to play a game of chess with him….
Best Regards: James Beaufore

Posted by: James Beaufore | September 26, 2008, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

The tactics vs. strategy comment is spot on. Overall, McCain seems to be totally impulsive and thoughtless about longer term consequences. The Palin pick was last-minute and impulsive, with little thought to the long-term consequences. Blowing off Letterman was impulsive (and rude), with little thought to the longer-term consequences. Given how Bush got us into Iraq largely due to an inability to think out the strategic consequences, I don’t think I want another impulsive man with his finger on the red button.

Posted by: Rick Sonntag | September 26, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.