Not only will Barrack Obama NOT were an America Flag Pin on his chest, but the Obama Campaign threw 12,000 America flags into the garbage after his cornation.
On a day we remember 9/11 we have a person who is friends with, and working with a known Terrorist, running for President…That person is Barrack Obama
Posted by: Country First | September 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Just more testament to Obama’s populist Che Guerva type Hype. He is a logo not a leader.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
I can’t believe they let keith lecture anywere! I mean really you wont vote for him cause of a pin. That iswhy the rest of the world sees americans as stupid and lazy.
Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Keith–I totally agree with you.
BO took his pin off after 9/11 when other Americans covered themselves with flags to support America.
Rev Wright’s sermons blamed us for 9/11 and cursed America. BO had to know Wright said those things.
I believe Obama shares those views and that is why he took that pin off after 9/11.
But you can bet Obama will have his flag pin on today.
Posted by: riley | September 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Keith,
So, if Obama would have said, “Sorry, I cannot work on that education reform for you governor because one of the people working on it was a leader of a group who bombed government installations.”, it would have been said that he cared more about his reputation than education.
Obama’s point about the flag pin is similar to people who go to church to show they are christian but do not back that up with their actions. I agree that for a while the flag pin was used to try to prove patriotism, but the actions of the person was not always in line. It was a false showing. For you, the pin had meaning and you want to show what your are feeling inside through the pin. That is great. Some people do not feel like they need to wear a pin to prove they are patriotic. Just like some people don’t feel like they have to attend church every week, sometimes twice a week, to prove they are christian.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
“Obama’s point about the flag pin is similar to people who go to church to show they are christian but do not back that up with their actions. ”
__________________________________________
Is similar to people LIKE OBAMA that go to churches that spew hate against American, yet they call it a CHRISTIAN church. Thank you for proving my point. How does Obama’s church back up their actions by saying:
“In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01. White America and the western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just ‘disappeared’ as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.” — Jeremiah Wright
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
This is an example of Obama’s patriotism:
He calls Rev Wright a great leader. Even though Wright blames 9/11 on America.
He calls Ayers “mainstream and respectable” even though he bombed the Pentagon and isn’t remorseful.
Obama put on a flag pin and left Wright to help his campaign not because he loved this country.
Posted by: sally | September 11, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Obama lectures us on 9/11. Nothing about muslim fanatical terrorists.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God d*mn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people. God d*mn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God d*mn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”
– Jeremiah Wright
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Keith, where has been McCain’s flag pin? Does he wear it all the time? Already know the answer. (Oh, and an FYI: Palin wears an Alaskan flag pin prominently… while her American flag pin is perched below it. At least, last time I checked…she may have shifted gears lately to assume the stance of “staunch” American since her husband’s ties to the Alaska Independent Party stuff came out.)
I wish you well. Truly. And ask you to consider voting…on a criteria other than, “Does he wear a flag pin?” (P.S. If that’s the case, you really can’t vote for McCain, either.)
Posted by: Barbyrah | September 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
I vote for many issues besides the pin Barbyrh. They point towards me not backing Obama.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
The real tragedy of the entire Obama for president phenomenon is the nature of what the liberal press core did pre-RNC in trying to drive this empty “new comer” down the throats of this nation.
It becomes evident that Obama handlers have been thrown off in such a manner as to let them feel the pavement with the lower posterior area of their anatomy with the introduction of Sarah Palin.
The “exchange” and “refute” of the day politics was actually started by Obama with his slams against Hilary. It would almost seem like “you get what you sow”.
It seems like now the networks and news coverage folks try to make every comment or every time these candidates blow their nose into a call to arms for those supporting these personalities.
Why don’t Obama and McCann just hold a joint news conference and tell the world that they genuinely do not like each other. Doing so might make the election get back to the issues rather than the news clip of the day mentality they are now embroiled in.
Might create an interesting exchange of thought amongst voters for a while. Fifty five more days of this is gonna make this a long election cycle.
Posted by: James Isett | September 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Keith,
You mean the church he left? How about Palin’s that claimed people who voted for Kerry were risking salvation? Or the one that claimed that Jews were damned if they did not become christian? Yep, I feel the love the basic foundation of the US in those statements.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
John who?
Posted by: hang | September 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Keith,
“You mean the church he left?”-Mack
_________________________________________
“I can no more disown (Jeremiah Wright) than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.”
– Barack Obama
Obama left Wright after the press hounded him on it. He did so with much reluctance. I would not have stayed in that church for 20 seconds and Obama stays for 20 years.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Right On Mack! That is why we are the laughing stock of the world. We would rather critique every little thing about a person than look at the real issues at hand. It is not the politicians that is dragging America through the mud or bringing her to her knees. It’s her, It’s him, It’s we, It’s us!
Posted by: Bobbi | September 11, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Sally,
How many years had passed since Ayers bombed government installations during a time of great unrest and when Obama worked with him on education reform? You may it sound like he bombed the Pentagon on his commute to a meeting with Obama.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Hey everybody who cares so much what the rest of the world thinks about America? Those same people love us when they need our military. They love to watch our sons and daughters die for their “right” to critisize the USA. Don’t kid yourselves. They are afraid of the people Americans defend them from.
Posted by: Kitty | September 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Actor Matt Damon tells interviewer he doesn’t think Sarah Palin is strong enough to stand up to Putin, etc. In other words, a woman just isn’t quite strong enough to lead a country. I guess Matt Damon will have to go on my boycott list – along with Oprah, Springsteen, bon Jovi, Sarandon, Whoopi, Obama-######$ at MSNBC, and anyone else who endorses Obama. Won’t buy their products, see their movies, watch their TV programs, vote for them. People, if you’re as sick as I am of seeing Hollywood try to tell the “little people” how to vote, send them a message – right straight into their pocket books.
Posted by: Carrie | September 11, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Carrie, I’ve been boycotting all along. Don’t watch Oprah or buy her rag magazine anymore. Bought my last Springsteen, bon Jovi. Hollywood needs to STHU!!! They aren’t any smarter than we are.
Posted by: Another Sarah | September 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Some guy painted a car in a pro-Obama way. So what!
Go ahead and rail against your fellow Americans.
What a brilliant campaign strategy.
I didn’t see any Obama supporters making fun of people wearing McCippahs!!
Posted by: Danny | September 11, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
The bam mobile; a bit much…..
Posted by: irma | September 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Another Sarah and Carrie, what’s the matter. People can’t have a different opinion than you.
Posted by: ? | September 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Obama is soooooo yesterday!
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Mack,
Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist. It doesn’t matter when the bombings took place, what matters is he doesn’t regret it and wished he could have done more. Keep trying to defend Barack’s association with him, please. More people need to hear about this. I mean, we all understand Chicago is an epicenter of left wing ideology, but are there any limits? Is it not fair to ask how the Woods Foundation was funded? How often did they meet? Did they have dinner together? What was their Annenberg body of work? What did they talk about? How similar are their political beliefs? How about a nice deep dive 60 Minutes piece on the whole thing, would you be up for that?
Posted by: Woody | September 11, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Oh yeah, that’s a cool car. I wonder if there’s a Model T McCain version out there?
Posted by: Woody | September 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
“Sarah Palin for at one point voicing some general support for the Bridge to Nowhere”
One point?
She made a speech to the citizens of that town and in the governors debate she clearly stated she supported the bridge and said it was urgent to build it while Alaska had a strong position in the Senate. Basically we need to build it quick before the fed takes away the earmark.
The right wing, nothing but disgusting liars.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Art and politics merging for the 2008 Presidential elections. Well done creator of the The Bam-Mobile. Pop culture in America is great. What would America be without its artists? Just looking at the Bam-Mobile made all the Republican attack ads fade away. This was a wonderful break from all the negative stories coming out about Obama. This artist made a Pop culture stand and made us smile. Art does that. I’m going out for my noon coffee and think about America Pop Culture.
I support McCain, but I love art cars, and this one is cool…more power to wacky political creativity…it’s fun!
I think a McCain one would be great…would it have to be an OLDSmobile? Terrible, I know…sorry… :)
“Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist.”
Barry’s buddies, Wright and Ayers believe we got what we had coming to us. Not a peep out of Barry. This is the kind of person that you want to lead our Nation?
“So, if Obama would have said, “Sorry, I cannot work on that education reform for you governor because one of the people working on it was a leader of a group who bombed government installations.”, it would have been said that he cared more about his reputation than education.”
People may have assumed that he had some integrity and real love for his country if he refused to work with the terrorist.
They achieved no reform, just wasted millions of dollars on who knows what.
Barry isn’t running against Palin? Really? Someone better tell him. She’s gotten into Barry’s head and under his skin, making him flop like a fish and lash out like a spoiled child!
I don’t mind celebrities using their names to influence people. More power to them. But, whatever they say is justified by logic. If Palin can’t stand up against Putin, I don’t see how logically that implies Obama can.
If standing up against adversaries in stressful conditions is a paramount reason to select a candidate, McCain is the proven answer.
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was a private entity run by William Ayers, financed by his father, and chaired by Obama. Its purpose was to create Revolution Through Education. At the very least, it proves that Obma and Ayers go back much further and more deeply than “he’s just a guy in my neighborhood”.
Ok Keith, when did McCain almost go democratic. But still, voting with Bush 90% of the time is troubling to me. Plus McCain said he knew nothing about the economy, not exactly gaining my confidence. And if he really wanted to shake things up he would have chosen Lieberman as his running mate. Crossing party lines for a vp is real change. Too bad he got hell for thinking about it.
Woody,
I have no problem with questions being asked. However, if you watched the interview with O’Reilly, Obama said they were working on education reform. It had nothing to do with anything Ayers did during the 60′s. If the meetings were about political things, then there could be concerns. However, they were working on education, which has nothing to do with bombing government installations in the 60′s.
I am no way saying Ayers was right. Bombing people or things do not help make your point.
Beck:
How is this so different than the electoral manipulations that Obama pulled in order to have his opponents disqualified and removed from the ballot when he ran for the Senate?
Wasn’t Obama just following “proper electoral procedures?”
Mack,
OK, so you’re a young upstart community organizer, fresh from Harvard, looking to make a difference. I can completely respect that. An unrepentant terrorist asks you if you would like to work on “education reform”, as you put it. After all, Mayor Daley has no problem with him, right? You’re one of the brightest people on the planet, according to all accounts, and after thinking it over you say, “Sure, I’m certain your past hasn’t shaped who you are today.” Is that the thought process I’m supposed to believe?
BTW, what was the “education reform” they worked on? What was the return on that investment? I have a right to know if this guy wants my vote.
Eight years ago, complaints about *charging rape victims for medical exams* prompted the Alaska Legislature to pass a bill — signed into law by Knowles — that banned the practice statewide.
“There was one town in Alaska that was charging victims for this, and that was Wasilla,” Knowles said.
Palin was the mayor of that town…
I’ll try to post one more time:
Erin at 12:52…McCain was asked to join the Dem party years ago, as he is a well know liberal Rep. That is why the Bush II is crap for a tie in…these two have had notorious battles and everyone knows McCain and Bush are not buddies and disagree on much. Bush slandered him back in 2004 with a horrible rumor that I wouldn’t forgive Bush for.
All you bots should be thrilled Bill has said he will actively campaign for Bozo. What a shame, Hill and Bill have to fake this charade.
Woody says:
No, it would have been said that Obama has unassailable priciples. Furthermore, if Obama had said to Daley, “What the hell are you doing with this guy on the board?” he would have demonstrated he has some stones, too.
If the committee was more of a political one, I would agree that it would have shown more unassailable principles. I have had to work on projects with known adulterers. That went against my principles, but the project we were working on had nothing to do with monogamous relationships or marriage. If they did, I would have excused myself from the project. Granted, bombing buildings and adultery are not the same thing, but I am trying to explain my thoughts on why I do not see a conflict of principles with Obama working on the education reforms with Ayers.
And as for your other post, you do have every right to know what came from the work they did together. But that is true for anything any of the candidates, President or VP, worked on. Including earmarked projects and how that money was used after the project was killed.
McCain has gained in the polls and electoral vote. Obama is toast
Obama 217
Mccain 216
Toss up 105
There are states that were leaning Obama now turning red!!!!
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Bush slandered him back in 2004 with a horrible rumor that I wouldn’t forgive Bush for.”
It was horrible but it happened in 2000.
And McCain hired the guy behind that smear to work for Palin.
That’s how much he hates Bush.
He hired the guy who smeared his own daughter.
Campaign first, family and country last.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
The Chicago machine flows through Exelon and the unions. Ayres is well connected in that regard. very well connected.
Aug 6th 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing on Bin Laden
“FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York”
While right wingers want to scream about who said what on 9/11.
Just remember whose gross incompetence let us get hit that day and whose gross incompetence has Bin Laden remaining a free man. That would be right wing hero, George Bush.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
What about the McCain/Follieri connection that is coming out in the news? Follieri, who yesterday got convicted on conspiracy, wire fraud, and money launderying, hosted a 70th birthday party for McCain on his yatch. Follieri then hired the lobbying firm created by Rick Davis, a top aid for McCain.
With the people politicians work with, many of them have associations with people with questionable pasts, or in this case present.
John McCain – “Experience and foresight that only comes with AGE”
“There’s not a history of clashes that are violent between Sunnis and Shiahs. So I think they can probably get along.” [MSNBC, 4/23/03]
” I believe that the success will be fairly easy.” [CNN, 9/24/02]
“We’re not going to get into house-to-house fighting in Baghdad. ” [CNN, 9/29/02]
“But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” [MSNBC, 1/22/03]
“But I believe that the Iraqi people will greet us as liberators.” [NBC, 3/20/03]
“It’s clear that the end is very much in sight.” [ABC, 4/9/03]
“This is a mission accomplished..” [This Week, ABC, 12/14/03]
“I’m confident we’re on the right course.” [ABC News, 3/7/04]
Can you give an estimate when can our troops come home? (Matt Lauer) “No, but that’s not too important,” [ABC 6/11/08]
“There were those of us who knew along that this would be difficult” (TV interview 07/08 …Uh, sure you did John, sure you did.)
I’M JUST GLAD SARAH PALIN HAS ALL THAT INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE KEEPING US SAFE FROM RUSSIA. I’M SURE HER JUDGEMENT IS BETTER BECAUSE OF IT.
Posted by: The McCain War Judgement | September 11, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Woody,
It would depend on what I was being asked to work with him on. How to protest a war? Definately not. How to increase the graduation rates? I would not have a problem. I would not accept an invitation to a cookout at his house, but I would work with him.
If you are a person who is absolutely against abortion no matter what the circumstances, would you refuse to work with a woman, or her husband, if she had had an abortion on something like improving the safety of pedestrians in a section of your neighborhood?
And why doesn’t anyone in the media attack Obama about Ayers? Because they’d loose all credibility. It’s a non-issue that is only propegated by weak minded Republicans.
Ayers DID NOT bomb anyone, he simply protested – which is still legal, for now at least. That may change with four more years of Republican censorship, I mean, “leadership”.
Obama worked with someone who happened to belong to a political organization 40 YEARS AGO, and that organization had a small fringe element 40 years ago, and in that fringe were a few radicals who used dispicable tactics 40 years ago. The “guilty by association” arguement is SO WEAK, I’m amazed that anyone is still trying to use it. But, that’s the Republican way – no substance but lots of smearing attacks.
Posted by: give it up, it's makes YOU look stupid | September 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
The McCain comment stems from an Oct. 31, 2005, appearance on the Charlie Rose talk show on PBS. He was asked about winning in Iraq. After discussing issues confronting that country, McCain concluded: “Afghanistan, we don’t read about anymore, because it’s succeeded. And by the way, there’s several reasons, including NATO participation and other reasons, why Afghanistan is doing as well as it is.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Is there still a war going on?
I thought “major combat operations” in Iraq ended in 2004. I swear I heard someone say that.
Posted by: More Poor Judgement | September 11, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
IGNORE THE GREEN SARAH POLLEN!
Take a hint: Sarah Pollen is all the way in Alaska.
Leave her there with her troopergate!
John McCaint = Bush = 8 years of national and international FAILURE and bad luck for Americans!
Sarah Pollen ‘SHARES THE VIEWS’ of McCaint!
That should be the target.
Obama has the Intelligence, Vision & Vigor to successfully handle the numerous challenges facing America.
McCaint lacks the vigor and vision and intelligence to handle the issues.
That is why McCaint want the election to be non-issue based
Woody,
How many were hurt in those bombings that Ayers participated in?
How many kids died when Republican Timothy McVeigh bombed the Murrah Building?
You remember Timothy McVeigh right? Who was captured, tried and executed.
How come Democrats seem to be able to catch the terrorists but Republicans can’t?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Woody,
With the problems in the Chicago school system, it wouldn’t necessarily have to be a far left ideology that is behind the reform. Much like the school systems in Cleveland, near where I grew up, radical changes were needed to try to salvage kids’ education, regardless of party affilication or ideology.
Let’s say in my example that she didn’t announce the abortion. Maybe you heard it through the grapevine, or someone saw her coming out of the clinic. Would you still work to get her off the board?
(BTW, pleasure debating with you. There is not many on the board you can debate with without it becoming name calling.)
More of the Same”
McCain, supported Bush politics, 95% of the time. What make you think he has changed? He chose Sarah Palin as the possible, President of the U.S.A., was the thought behind this, Country First.
After the brain-washing she will be allowed to speak…then we will know, or will we?
However, it wouldn’t surprise me, if she resigns once the election is over, if they win… What a ploy…Values and honesty and Country First, are not high in this party politics.
I forgot, Values and
Righteousness and Country First, is high priorities. But, why would he choose Sarah Palin?
Who would replace Sarah Palin, if she resigns or is booted off the ticket….I blushed, I thought it might be Chaney. Insuring that we have “MORE OF THE SAME”.
Woody,
It was the best one I could think of that took strong principles into consideration, which was to address your statement about showing unassailable principles.
Ayers did some horrible things with trying to terrorize the government into leaving Vietnam. If he had been a wanted fugitive and Obama was not turing him in, I would have a problem with the association. However, Ayers was not a fugitive. If Ayers had done the same actions in today’s legal system, he would not have been let out of jail, and probably would have had a cell next to McVeigh waiting for his execution. Which I would have no problem with. I don’t agree with his methods in any way, shape, or form.
Whether Ayers is repentant about what he did, I agree he could be more repentant. However, I don’t agree with the generally used interpretation of his recent statement to show he is not remoseful. According to Ayers, and I have yet to see proof he meant otherwise, when he said “we should have done more”, he meant over all to stop the war and not more bombings.
As far as I know, since he did his time for bombing the building and killing the police officer, he has not participated in any terroristic activities. At what point can a person try to contribute to the community and not be considered a liability to work with?
Everyone get off this Obama – Ayers connection. This is ridiculous. I see many of those who posted are not aware of the real facts. I am not wasting my time anymore!!! Ayers was tried and found innocent. He went on to live life well. Has become a respected college professor specializing in education reform. Those were the days of the Anti- Vietnam War Protests. Government was labeling everyone a communist or terrorist. Group Weather Underground didn’t do much except to blow themselves up in their own home. Two were pardoned by President Clinton.
All happened almost 40 years ago. Obama a child probably riding a tricycle at the time. Obama served on a Charity Board that he was on for short while.
FACT – NOTHING TO STORY.
NEWS TRIED. INVESTIGATORS TRIED. THIS IS OLD NEWS.
THIS IS JUST RIDICULOUS, AND WAS PUT OUT THERE WHEN HILARY ATTEMPTED TO WIN PENNSYLVANIA. AND SHE DID WITH HELP OF FLIERS GIVEN TO ALL WORKERS, RESIDENTS IN RURAL AREAS. I SAW THE FLIER. I SAW THE NEW REPORTS AND MULTIPLE TESTIMONY OF PEOPLE VERIFYING FLIERS SENT.
Ya know, since this election is about flag pins. John McCain didnt wear his when he gave his acceptance speech. OMG- HE HATES AMERICA AND IS A TERRIOST OUT TO DESTROY OUR GREAT NATION.
REVEREND HAGEE SAID THAT KATRINA WAS THE WRATH OF GOD CAUSED BY GAYS AND LIBERALS. THEN MCCAIN ANNOUCED HE DIDNT ACCEPT THOSE VIEWS. OMG HE ACTUALLY AGREE’S AND HATES AMERICA.
MCCain made a speech in Virginia Beach that criticized Christian leaders, including Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, as divisive conservatives, declaring “… we embrace the fine members of the religious conservative community. But that does not mean that we will pander to their self-appointed leaders. yet he is now pandering to that very audience.
Who is John McCain’s pastor? I mean the only one that was put under the spotlight during this campaign was the pastor who served his country with honor in Vietnam, and then was treated as the new antichrist by the media.
Posted by: americans are such blind sheep. | September 11, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
If Ayers were a real terrorist, then Bush would have made sure he and his family got protection as they fleed the country after 9/11 — just like he did for his friends in the bin Laden family!
Bush and McCain see bin Laden as a family friend’s rebel kid. Cronism is blinding!
Choose Obama/Biden ’08 for yours and your children’s safety.
Posted by: Common Sense | September 11, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
URGENT NEWS!!!
There is a Zoophile-Rights revolution under way in Europe and it’s approaching our shores!
Imagine that!
There’s a Documentary about them, called COMING SOON, that they’re streaming for free at http://www.comingsoon.cz.
Watch it and do something before it’s too late!!!
Spread the word!!!
G-d bless us all!!!
Posted by: Paul Mitchell | September 12, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage 
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Not only will Barrack Obama NOT were an America Flag Pin on his chest, but the Obama Campaign threw 12,000 America flags into the garbage after his cornation.
On a day we remember 9/11 we have a person who is friends with, and working with a known Terrorist, running for President…That person is Barrack Obama
Posted by: Country First | September 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Just more testament to Obama’s populist Che Guerva type Hype. He is a logo not a leader.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
I can’t believe they let keith lecture anywere! I mean really you wont vote for him cause of a pin. That iswhy the rest of the world sees americans as stupid and lazy.
Posted by: Joe | September 11, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Keith–I totally agree with you.
BO took his pin off after 9/11 when other Americans covered themselves with flags to support America.
Rev Wright’s sermons blamed us for 9/11 and cursed America. BO had to know Wright said those things.
I believe Obama shares those views and that is why he took that pin off after 9/11.
But you can bet Obama will have his flag pin on today.
Posted by: riley | September 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Keith,
So, if Obama would have said, “Sorry, I cannot work on that education reform for you governor because one of the people working on it was a leader of a group who bombed government installations.”, it would have been said that he cared more about his reputation than education.
Obama’s point about the flag pin is similar to people who go to church to show they are christian but do not back that up with their actions. I agree that for a while the flag pin was used to try to prove patriotism, but the actions of the person was not always in line. It was a false showing. For you, the pin had meaning and you want to show what your are feeling inside through the pin. That is great. Some people do not feel like they need to wear a pin to prove they are patriotic. Just like some people don’t feel like they have to attend church every week, sometimes twice a week, to prove they are christian.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
“Obama’s point about the flag pin is similar to people who go to church to show they are christian but do not back that up with their actions. ”
__________________________________________
Is similar to people LIKE OBAMA that go to churches that spew hate against American, yet they call it a CHRISTIAN church. Thank you for proving my point. How does Obama’s church back up their actions by saying:
“In the 21st century, white America got a wake-up call after 9/11/01. White America and the western world came to realize that people of color had not gone away, faded into the woodwork or just ‘disappeared’ as the Great White West kept on its merry way of ignoring black concerns.” — Jeremiah Wright
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
This is an example of Obama’s patriotism:
He calls Rev Wright a great leader. Even though Wright blames 9/11 on America.
He calls Ayers “mainstream and respectable” even though he bombed the Pentagon and isn’t remorseful.
Obama put on a flag pin and left Wright to help his campaign not because he loved this country.
Posted by: sally | September 11, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Obama lectures us on 9/11. Nothing about muslim fanatical terrorists.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God d*mn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people. God d*mn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God d*mn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”
– Jeremiah Wright
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Keith, where has been McCain’s flag pin? Does he wear it all the time? Already know the answer. (Oh, and an FYI: Palin wears an Alaskan flag pin prominently… while her American flag pin is perched below it. At least, last time I checked…she may have shifted gears lately to assume the stance of “staunch” American since her husband’s ties to the Alaska Independent Party stuff came out.)
I wish you well. Truly. And ask you to consider voting…on a criteria other than, “Does he wear a flag pin?” (P.S. If that’s the case, you really can’t vote for McCain, either.)
Posted by: Barbyrah | September 11, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
I vote for many issues besides the pin Barbyrh. They point towards me not backing Obama.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
The real tragedy of the entire Obama for president phenomenon is the nature of what the liberal press core did pre-RNC in trying to drive this empty “new comer” down the throats of this nation.
It becomes evident that Obama handlers have been thrown off in such a manner as to let them feel the pavement with the lower posterior area of their anatomy with the introduction of Sarah Palin.
The “exchange” and “refute” of the day politics was actually started by Obama with his slams against Hilary. It would almost seem like “you get what you sow”.
It seems like now the networks and news coverage folks try to make every comment or every time these candidates blow their nose into a call to arms for those supporting these personalities.
Why don’t Obama and McCann just hold a joint news conference and tell the world that they genuinely do not like each other. Doing so might make the election get back to the issues rather than the news clip of the day mentality they are now embroiled in.
Might create an interesting exchange of thought amongst voters for a while. Fifty five more days of this is gonna make this a long election cycle.
Posted by: James Isett | September 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Keith,
You mean the church he left? How about Palin’s that claimed people who voted for Kerry were risking salvation? Or the one that claimed that Jews were damned if they did not become christian? Yep, I feel the love the basic foundation of the US in those statements.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
John who?
Posted by: hang | September 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Keith,
“You mean the church he left?”-Mack
_________________________________________
“I can no more disown (Jeremiah Wright) than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.”
– Barack Obama
Obama left Wright after the press hounded him on it. He did so with much reluctance. I would not have stayed in that church for 20 seconds and Obama stays for 20 years.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Right On Mack! That is why we are the laughing stock of the world. We would rather critique every little thing about a person than look at the real issues at hand. It is not the politicians that is dragging America through the mud or bringing her to her knees. It’s her, It’s him, It’s we, It’s us!
Posted by: Bobbi | September 11, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Sally,
How many years had passed since Ayers bombed government installations during a time of great unrest and when Obama worked with him on education reform? You may it sound like he bombed the Pentagon on his commute to a meeting with Obama.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Hey everybody who cares so much what the rest of the world thinks about America? Those same people love us when they need our military. They love to watch our sons and daughters die for their “right” to critisize the USA. Don’t kid yourselves. They are afraid of the people Americans defend them from.
Posted by: Kitty | September 11, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Actor Matt Damon tells interviewer he doesn’t think Sarah Palin is strong enough to stand up to Putin, etc. In other words, a woman just isn’t quite strong enough to lead a country. I guess Matt Damon will have to go on my boycott list – along with Oprah, Springsteen, bon Jovi, Sarandon, Whoopi, Obama-######$ at MSNBC, and anyone else who endorses Obama. Won’t buy their products, see their movies, watch their TV programs, vote for them. People, if you’re as sick as I am of seeing Hollywood try to tell the “little people” how to vote, send them a message – right straight into their pocket books.
Posted by: Carrie | September 11, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Carrie, I’ve been boycotting all along. Don’t watch Oprah or buy her rag magazine anymore. Bought my last Springsteen, bon Jovi. Hollywood needs to STHU!!! They aren’t any smarter than we are.
Posted by: Another Sarah | September 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Some guy painted a car in a pro-Obama way. So what!
Go ahead and rail against your fellow Americans.
What a brilliant campaign strategy.
I didn’t see any Obama supporters making fun of people wearing McCippahs!!
Posted by: Danny | September 11, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
The bam mobile; a bit much…..
Posted by: irma | September 11, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
Another Sarah and Carrie, what’s the matter. People can’t have a different opinion than you.
Posted by: ? | September 11, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Obama is soooooo yesterday!
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
Mack,
Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist. It doesn’t matter when the bombings took place, what matters is he doesn’t regret it and wished he could have done more. Keep trying to defend Barack’s association with him, please. More people need to hear about this. I mean, we all understand Chicago is an epicenter of left wing ideology, but are there any limits? Is it not fair to ask how the Woods Foundation was funded? How often did they meet? Did they have dinner together? What was their Annenberg body of work? What did they talk about? How similar are their political beliefs? How about a nice deep dive 60 Minutes piece on the whole thing, would you be up for that?
Posted by: Woody | September 11, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Oh yeah, that’s a cool car. I wonder if there’s a Model T McCain version out there?
Posted by: Woody | September 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
“Sarah Palin for at one point voicing some general support for the Bridge to Nowhere”
One point?
She made a speech to the citizens of that town and in the governors debate she clearly stated she supported the bridge and said it was urgent to build it while Alaska had a strong position in the Senate. Basically we need to build it quick before the fed takes away the earmark.
The right wing, nothing but disgusting liars.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Art and politics merging for the 2008 Presidential elections. Well done creator of the The Bam-Mobile. Pop culture in America is great. What would America be without its artists? Just looking at the Bam-Mobile made all the Republican attack ads fade away. This was a wonderful break from all the negative stories coming out about Obama. This artist made a Pop culture stand and made us smile. Art does that. I’m going out for my noon coffee and think about America Pop Culture.
Posted by: Cooday | September 11, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
I support McCain, but I love art cars, and this one is cool…more power to wacky political creativity…it’s fun!
I think a McCain one would be great…would it have to be an OLDSmobile? Terrible, I know…sorry… :)
Posted by: Wade | September 11, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
hey harry
mccain is running for president not palin
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 11, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
“Ayers is an unrepentant terrorist.”
Barry’s buddies, Wright and Ayers believe we got what we had coming to us. Not a peep out of Barry. This is the kind of person that you want to lead our Nation?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
“So, if Obama would have said, “Sorry, I cannot work on that education reform for you governor because one of the people working on it was a leader of a group who bombed government installations.”, it would have been said that he cared more about his reputation than education.”
People may have assumed that he had some integrity and real love for his country if he refused to work with the terrorist.
They achieved no reform, just wasted millions of dollars on who knows what.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Barry isn’t running against Palin? Really? Someone better tell him. She’s gotten into Barry’s head and under his skin, making him flop like a fish and lash out like a spoiled child!
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Mack if I don’t like Obama then I’ll vote him out in 4 years. But I’m sick of republicans running this country, enough for me.
Posted by: erin | September 11, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I don’t mind celebrities using their names to influence people. More power to them. But, whatever they say is justified by logic. If Palin can’t stand up against Putin, I don’t see how logically that implies Obama can.
If standing up against adversaries in stressful conditions is a paramount reason to select a candidate, McCain is the proven answer.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 11, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
The Chicago Annenberg Challenge was a private entity run by William Ayers, financed by his father, and chaired by Obama. Its purpose was to create Revolution Through Education. At the very least, it proves that Obma and Ayers go back much further and more deeply than “he’s just a guy in my neighborhood”.
Posted by: marylou | September 11, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Ok Keith, when did McCain almost go democratic. But still, voting with Bush 90% of the time is troubling to me. Plus McCain said he knew nothing about the economy, not exactly gaining my confidence. And if he really wanted to shake things up he would have chosen Lieberman as his running mate. Crossing party lines for a vp is real change. Too bad he got hell for thinking about it.
Posted by: erin | September 11, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Woody,
I have no problem with questions being asked. However, if you watched the interview with O’Reilly, Obama said they were working on education reform. It had nothing to do with anything Ayers did during the 60′s. If the meetings were about political things, then there could be concerns. However, they were working on education, which has nothing to do with bombing government installations in the 60′s.
I am no way saying Ayers was right. Bombing people or things do not help make your point.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Beck:
How is this so different than the electoral manipulations that Obama pulled in order to have his opponents disqualified and removed from the ballot when he ran for the Senate?
Wasn’t Obama just following “proper electoral procedures?”
Posted by: SandyB | September 11, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Very unpresidential! They got one thing right – his head IS bigger than his body. Such an egotist!!
Posted by: Beckie | September 11, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Mack,
OK, so you’re a young upstart community organizer, fresh from Harvard, looking to make a difference. I can completely respect that. An unrepentant terrorist asks you if you would like to work on “education reform”, as you put it. After all, Mayor Daley has no problem with him, right? You’re one of the brightest people on the planet, according to all accounts, and after thinking it over you say, “Sure, I’m certain your past hasn’t shaped who you are today.” Is that the thought process I’m supposed to believe?
BTW, what was the “education reform” they worked on? What was the return on that investment? I have a right to know if this guy wants my vote.
Posted by: Woody | September 11, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Eight years ago, complaints about *charging rape victims for medical exams* prompted the Alaska Legislature to pass a bill — signed into law by Knowles — that banned the practice statewide.
“There was one town in Alaska that was charging victims for this, and that was Wasilla,” Knowles said.
Palin was the mayor of that town…
Posted by: Polderboy | September 11, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
I’ll try to post one more time:
Erin at 12:52…McCain was asked to join the Dem party years ago, as he is a well know liberal Rep. That is why the Bush II is crap for a tie in…these two have had notorious battles and everyone knows McCain and Bush are not buddies and disagree on much. Bush slandered him back in 2004 with a horrible rumor that I wouldn’t forgive Bush for.
All you bots should be thrilled Bill has said he will actively campaign for Bozo. What a shame, Hill and Bill have to fake this charade.
Posted by: Debra | September 11, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Woody says:
No, it would have been said that Obama has unassailable priciples. Furthermore, if Obama had said to Daley, “What the hell are you doing with this guy on the board?” he would have demonstrated he has some stones, too.
If the committee was more of a political one, I would agree that it would have shown more unassailable principles. I have had to work on projects with known adulterers. That went against my principles, but the project we were working on had nothing to do with monogamous relationships or marriage. If they did, I would have excused myself from the project. Granted, bombing buildings and adultery are not the same thing, but I am trying to explain my thoughts on why I do not see a conflict of principles with Obama working on the education reforms with Ayers.
And as for your other post, you do have every right to know what came from the work they did together. But that is true for anything any of the candidates, President or VP, worked on. Including earmarked projects and how that money was used after the project was killed.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
McCain has gained in the polls and electoral vote. Obama is toast
Obama 217
Mccain 216
Toss up 105
There are states that were leaning Obama now turning red!!!!
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 11, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Bush slandered him back in 2004 with a horrible rumor that I wouldn’t forgive Bush for.”
It was horrible but it happened in 2000.
And McCain hired the guy behind that smear to work for Palin.
That’s how much he hates Bush.
He hired the guy who smeared his own daughter.
Campaign first, family and country last.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
The Chicago machine flows through Exelon and the unions. Ayres is well connected in that regard. very well connected.
Posted by: geevill | September 11, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Aug 6th 2001 Presidential Daily Briefing on Bin Laden
“FBI information since that time indicates patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York”
While right wingers want to scream about who said what on 9/11.
Just remember whose gross incompetence let us get hit that day and whose gross incompetence has Bin Laden remaining a free man. That would be right wing hero, George Bush.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
What about the McCain/Follieri connection that is coming out in the news? Follieri, who yesterday got convicted on conspiracy, wire fraud, and money launderying, hosted a 70th birthday party for McCain on his yatch. Follieri then hired the lobbying firm created by Rick Davis, a top aid for McCain.
With the people politicians work with, many of them have associations with people with questionable pasts, or in this case present.
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
John McCain – “Experience and foresight that only comes with AGE”
“There’s not a history of clashes that are violent between Sunnis and Shiahs. So I think they can probably get along.” [MSNBC, 4/23/03]
” I believe that the success will be fairly easy.” [CNN, 9/24/02]
“We’re not going to get into house-to-house fighting in Baghdad. ” [CNN, 9/29/02]
“But the point is that, one, we will win this conflict. We will win it easily.” [MSNBC, 1/22/03]
“But I believe that the Iraqi people will greet us as liberators.” [NBC, 3/20/03]
“It’s clear that the end is very much in sight.” [ABC, 4/9/03]
“This is a mission accomplished..” [This Week, ABC, 12/14/03]
“I’m confident we’re on the right course.” [ABC News, 3/7/04]
Can you give an estimate when can our troops come home? (Matt Lauer) “No, but that’s not too important,” [ABC 6/11/08]
“There were those of us who knew along that this would be difficult” (TV interview 07/08 …Uh, sure you did John, sure you did.)
I’M JUST GLAD SARAH PALIN HAS ALL THAT INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE KEEPING US SAFE FROM RUSSIA. I’M SURE HER JUDGEMENT IS BETTER BECAUSE OF IT.
Posted by: The McCain War Judgement | September 11, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
Woody,
It would depend on what I was being asked to work with him on. How to protest a war? Definately not. How to increase the graduation rates? I would not have a problem. I would not accept an invitation to a cookout at his house, but I would work with him.
If you are a person who is absolutely against abortion no matter what the circumstances, would you refuse to work with a woman, or her husband, if she had had an abortion on something like improving the safety of pedestrians in a section of your neighborhood?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
And why doesn’t anyone in the media attack Obama about Ayers? Because they’d loose all credibility. It’s a non-issue that is only propegated by weak minded Republicans.
Ayers DID NOT bomb anyone, he simply protested – which is still legal, for now at least. That may change with four more years of Republican censorship, I mean, “leadership”.
Obama worked with someone who happened to belong to a political organization 40 YEARS AGO, and that organization had a small fringe element 40 years ago, and in that fringe were a few radicals who used dispicable tactics 40 years ago. The “guilty by association” arguement is SO WEAK, I’m amazed that anyone is still trying to use it. But, that’s the Republican way – no substance but lots of smearing attacks.
Posted by: give it up, it's makes YOU look stupid | September 11, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
The McCain comment stems from an Oct. 31, 2005, appearance on the Charlie Rose talk show on PBS. He was asked about winning in Iraq. After discussing issues confronting that country, McCain concluded: “Afghanistan, we don’t read about anymore, because it’s succeeded. And by the way, there’s several reasons, including NATO participation and other reasons, why Afghanistan is doing as well as it is.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Is there still a war going on?
I thought “major combat operations” in Iraq ended in 2004. I swear I heard someone say that.
Posted by: More Poor Judgement | September 11, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
IGNORE THE GREEN SARAH POLLEN!
Take a hint: Sarah Pollen is all the way in Alaska.
Leave her there with her troopergate!
John McCaint = Bush = 8 years of national and international FAILURE and bad luck for Americans!
Sarah Pollen ‘SHARES THE VIEWS’ of McCaint!
That should be the target.
Obama has the Intelligence, Vision & Vigor to successfully handle the numerous challenges facing America.
McCaint lacks the vigor and vision and intelligence to handle the issues.
That is why McCaint want the election to be non-issue based
Posted by: Patriot | September 11, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Woody,
How many were hurt in those bombings that Ayers participated in?
How many kids died when Republican Timothy McVeigh bombed the Murrah Building?
You remember Timothy McVeigh right? Who was captured, tried and executed.
How come Democrats seem to be able to catch the terrorists but Republicans can’t?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 11, 2008, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Woody,
With the problems in the Chicago school system, it wouldn’t necessarily have to be a far left ideology that is behind the reform. Much like the school systems in Cleveland, near where I grew up, radical changes were needed to try to salvage kids’ education, regardless of party affilication or ideology.
Let’s say in my example that she didn’t announce the abortion. Maybe you heard it through the grapevine, or someone saw her coming out of the clinic. Would you still work to get her off the board?
(BTW, pleasure debating with you. There is not many on the board you can debate with without it becoming name calling.)
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
More of the Same”
McCain, supported Bush politics, 95% of the time. What make you think he has changed? He chose Sarah Palin as the possible, President of the U.S.A., was the thought behind this, Country First.
After the brain-washing she will be allowed to speak…then we will know, or will we?
However, it wouldn’t surprise me, if she resigns once the election is over, if they win… What a ploy…Values and honesty and Country First, are not high in this party politics.
I forgot, Values and
Righteousness and Country First, is high priorities. But, why would he choose Sarah Palin?
Who would replace Sarah Palin, if she resigns or is booted off the ticket….I blushed, I thought it might be Chaney. Insuring that we have “MORE OF THE SAME”.
Posted by: JBARNES | September 11, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Woody,
It was the best one I could think of that took strong principles into consideration, which was to address your statement about showing unassailable principles.
Ayers did some horrible things with trying to terrorize the government into leaving Vietnam. If he had been a wanted fugitive and Obama was not turing him in, I would have a problem with the association. However, Ayers was not a fugitive. If Ayers had done the same actions in today’s legal system, he would not have been let out of jail, and probably would have had a cell next to McVeigh waiting for his execution. Which I would have no problem with. I don’t agree with his methods in any way, shape, or form.
Whether Ayers is repentant about what he did, I agree he could be more repentant. However, I don’t agree with the generally used interpretation of his recent statement to show he is not remoseful. According to Ayers, and I have yet to see proof he meant otherwise, when he said “we should have done more”, he meant over all to stop the war and not more bombings.
As far as I know, since he did his time for bombing the building and killing the police officer, he has not participated in any terroristic activities. At what point can a person try to contribute to the community and not be considered a liability to work with?
Posted by: Mack | September 11, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Bammy’s a worldbeater and the
next POTUS!
Posted by: anon | September 11, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Everyone get off this Obama – Ayers connection. This is ridiculous. I see many of those who posted are not aware of the real facts. I am not wasting my time anymore!!! Ayers was tried and found innocent. He went on to live life well. Has become a respected college professor specializing in education reform. Those were the days of the Anti- Vietnam War Protests. Government was labeling everyone a communist or terrorist. Group Weather Underground didn’t do much except to blow themselves up in their own home. Two were pardoned by President Clinton.
All happened almost 40 years ago. Obama a child probably riding a tricycle at the time. Obama served on a Charity Board that he was on for short while.
FACT – NOTHING TO STORY.
NEWS TRIED. INVESTIGATORS TRIED. THIS IS OLD NEWS.
THIS IS JUST RIDICULOUS, AND WAS PUT OUT THERE WHEN HILARY ATTEMPTED TO WIN PENNSYLVANIA. AND SHE DID WITH HELP OF FLIERS GIVEN TO ALL WORKERS, RESIDENTS IN RURAL AREAS. I SAW THE FLIER. I SAW THE NEW REPORTS AND MULTIPLE TESTIMONY OF PEOPLE VERIFYING FLIERS SENT.
Posted by: Sharonklim | September 11, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Ya know, since this election is about flag pins. John McCain didnt wear his when he gave his acceptance speech. OMG- HE HATES AMERICA AND IS A TERRIOST OUT TO DESTROY OUR GREAT NATION.
REVEREND HAGEE SAID THAT KATRINA WAS THE WRATH OF GOD CAUSED BY GAYS AND LIBERALS. THEN MCCAIN ANNOUCED HE DIDNT ACCEPT THOSE VIEWS. OMG HE ACTUALLY AGREE’S AND HATES AMERICA.
MCCain made a speech in Virginia Beach that criticized Christian leaders, including Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell, as divisive conservatives, declaring “… we embrace the fine members of the religious conservative community. But that does not mean that we will pander to their self-appointed leaders. yet he is now pandering to that very audience.
Who is John McCain’s pastor? I mean the only one that was put under the spotlight during this campaign was the pastor who served his country with honor in Vietnam, and then was treated as the new antichrist by the media.
Posted by: americans are such blind sheep. | September 11, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
If Ayers were a real terrorist, then Bush would have made sure he and his family got protection as they fleed the country after 9/11 — just like he did for his friends in the bin Laden family!
Bush and McCain see bin Laden as a family friend’s rebel kid. Cronism is blinding!
Choose Obama/Biden ’08 for yours and your children’s safety.
Posted by: Common Sense | September 11, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
URGENT NEWS!!!
There is a Zoophile-Rights revolution under way in Europe and it’s approaching our shores!
Imagine that!
There’s a Documentary about them, called COMING SOON, that they’re streaming for free at http://www.comingsoon.cz.
Watch it and do something before it’s too late!!!
Spread the word!!!
G-d bless us all!!!
Posted by: Paul Mitchell | September 12, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am