By Hope Ditto

Sep 25, 2008 8:30am

The Note: McCain’s Move: Brilliant or Boneheaded?

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports in Thursday’s Note: There was no bailout coming for Sen. John McCain’s campaign. So he tried to create his own.

McCain’s move is a gamble, something of a gimmick — and something that only a campaign headed in the wrong direction might do. But for a campaign trying to project “country first,” there may not be a better chance to live the message.

Whether or not there’s a deal and therefore a debate, McCain dealt himself back into the biggest issue of the campaign.

A day of candidate phone tag — capped by asking for a debate rain check — put Sen. Barack Obama on defense at least for the moment, leaving him (perhaps awkwardly, perhaps elegantly) defending politics while McCain talks policy.

As of Thursday morning, McCain aides tell ABC News that the candidate isn’t going to Mississippi Friday unless a deal on the bailout bill is in place — though the prospects of such a deal are looking up.

Read the rest of The Note — and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day — from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.

Maybe he’s seen, ultimately, as nudging things along. But is this a measure that McCain wants to be witnessed touching?

“John McCain is a gambler by nature, and the bet he placed Wednesday may be among the biggest of his political life,” Dan Balz writes in The Washington Post. “What he risks, if things don’t go as he hopes, is a judgment by voters that his move was a reckless act by an impetuous and struggling politician that hardened partisan lines in Washington at just the wrong moment and complicated efforts to deal with the biggest financial crisis in more than half a century.”

It’s the surge all over again: McCain now owns a policy that’s viewed with fierce skepticism, even (and especially) by members of his own party. It’s not that he hasn’t been here before — it’s that he hasn’t been here before this close to an election.

Did someone mention a gamble? “Faced with unfavorable odds in the presidential campaign, John McCain time and again finds a way to roll the dice,” Peter Wallsten and Peter Nicholas write for the Los Angeles Times. “And, like naming a running mate untested on the national stage, it carries risks: Will voters view McCain’s move as decisive, or unsteady, or even as an overtly partisan act to gain traction on an issue that he said Wednesday should transcend partisanship?”

“Bold or bonkers,” reads the New York Daily News headline.

Continue reading today’s Note by clicking HERE.

ABC News’ Hope Ditto contributed to this report.

User Comments

McCain wimps out of the debate because he has no way to answer for the republican disaster of the last eight years, and Sarah Mooseburger won’t answer any questions from anyone because she’s an idiot. And half the country supports these frauds. They elected Bush twice, why not McBush the third?

Posted by: Bob | September 25, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am

100% Boneheaded – He is NOT the President nor is he acting Presidential.
If Winston Churchill could leave London in December 1941 and travel to America to address a joint session of Congress even as British troops in the Far East were reeling under Japanese attacks, somehow we think John McCain can make his way down to Oxford, Miss., for a debate Friday evening without imperiling the future of America. (Rocky Mountain News)

Posted by: Paige | September 25, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

Bill Clinton just took Obama to the woodshed.

Posted by: geevill | September 25, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Anytime you need to ask if a move was boneheaded or brilliant why not just say pander or political?

Posted by: jim | September 25, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Wall Street Greed VS Main Street Need
Dear concerned citizens of America and Mass Media of the U.S.A.
As a concerned registered independent voter, forensic psychiatrist, disabled American I made my decision to vote after taking into consideration following joint tickets attributes and characteristics.
1. Has the ticket shown adequate calmness, coolness, and connectedness’s under pressure to lead our nation [Presidential Temperament]?
2. Has the ticket shown sustained sound “Judgment and Caliber”?
3. Has the ticket shown adequate understanding of depth and degree to address the crucial challenges in their their purpose, policies, and positions [ Honesty, integrity and sincerity]?
4. Has the ticket sufficient “understanding and knowledge” of inside Washington workings [Experience]“?
5. Has the ticket reservoir resilience, wisdom, and vigor to address the present and future f our beloved “Great-grand Nation”?
6. Has the ticket enough joint foreign policy experience and exposure based on ” Values, Virtues, Vastness, and ” [American moral soul]“?
7. Has their campaign talk, slogans, ads, plans, and programs based on facts and are they free of fear, fiction, frivolous labels, unfair attacks, negativity, and impulsively? [No "imminent danger to national
security and safety"].
8. Has the ticket genuinely kept on message of country first and politics last and avoided copying [Message change"]?
9.Has the ticket message stayed away from Culture divide and war[ Disaster prevention ]?
10. Has the ticket resisted being surrounded, supported and surrogate’s by divisiveness, distortion’s, and destructive characters, [ Real patriotism VS shiftiness and shameless parrot-ism]?
11. Has the ticket thoughtful, real non-partisan, & non-impulsive plans to address our current economic crisis or political tactics and temperamental statements.
I have personally and professionally concluded that OBAMA-BIDEN ticket will lift and inspire our greatgrand nation back to its greatness within and restore our global standing with the use of maximum, firm
international diplomacy and minimal force if and when indicated {” Peace thru Strenght “}.
12. The era of responsibility has to replace irresponsibility and unaccountability will change to accountability and transparency. The Wall Street greed will change to Main Street need.
Yours sincerely,
COL. A.M.Khajawall [Ret] MD.
Forensic psychiatrist, Disabled American Veteran and Iraq
Freedom team. Grass roots California leader per Senator McCain’s
PS: It is sad and unfortunate that Hon, Temperamental Maverick McCain has been turned into ” Roller-coaster” by his political moves and handlers.

Posted by: COL.A.M.Khajawall [Ret[ | September 25, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am

If anyone can’t see that this is a political stunt have to be as stupid as McCain. To hear people say oh this is Presidential is absolutely ludacris! If you can’t chew gum and walk at the same time, then spit it out and move on! What will he do if he’s President and we have a catastrophe? Probably read part 2 of My Pet Goat!

Posted by: R | September 25, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am

In one of his ad McCain point a finger on Obama for not acting on this issue. And now what is he doing? You decide. . . concern voter

Posted by: concern voter | September 25, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am

A Stunt is not a Plan!
If McCain is so honorable, he would have waited until Obama gave his opinion before McCain decided to suspend his campaign.
This is another “stunt” to shake things up, just like Palin.
Do we need leaders that will pull stunts or come up with a “plan”.

Posted by: r-dub | September 25, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

I don’t need someone “gambling” with my future. What is more important than proving you are ready for the job. If he can’t handle more than one crisis at a time, then what the heck is he doing running for president? His VP choice sure can’t help. She can’t even handle questions from the media unless it’s in a controlled environment.He should be able to fly to Washington, have meetings, fly to Mississippi and do the debate and fly back to Washington. It’s called multi-tasking. Something the majority of us do on a daily basis.

Posted by: Bea | September 25, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

That’s what the country needs, another idiot for president, a gambler, a mavarick, what the hell is he going to offer to fix the problem, he claimed himself not to be an economy expert, so now he whimps out of the debate and thinks he looks like he knows something or cares, I’m sick of these morons….

Posted by: matt | September 25, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

geevill – you mean Clinton on the morning shows stating the financial crisis has the potential to become a true disaster, and touted Obama as the man to resolve it? That’s a really nice “woodshed”.

Posted by: Paige | September 25, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

geevil get a life. Go find a woman or something. I’m beginning to feel sorry for you. When McCain picked Sarah Palin, everyone thought it was a stroke of genius. Now that the new-shoe glow is gone, it is beginning to backfire. McCain does not have the temprament to be the President. He is a gambler. The Presidency is not for gamblers. The Presidency needs discipline. The only thing keeping McCain in this race is the fact that he is running against a black man. Period. As for Bill Clinton: he is turning himself rapidly into another Liebermann. It is very clear that he is trying to undermine Obama in this campaign.

Posted by: Kevin | September 25, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am

geevil, I read your crap out here all the time and you just spew hate and racism all the time, go back to the park and pick up the rest of the trash, you are just an angry person with nothing to offer….

Posted by: matt | September 25, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am

Brilliant

Posted by: anon | September 25, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

A PLOY he is hurtung and b=needs a new tatic…..He is a piece of junk

Posted by: indp voter | September 25, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Of Obama insists on debating Friday noght and there is no deal, Sarah Palin should be send in McCain’s stead to debate Obama, as would be appropriate for a VP candidate. I think its the best solution.

Posted by: s.b. | September 25, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

My thoughts exactly Dr. Khajawall. Thank you.

Posted by: ohiogal | September 25, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Lindsey Graham speaks to Fox that Americans needs this, package to go through. Yet all the Republicans, including McCain, were against the bill. So This means according to Lindsey Graham, The Republicans were wrong? All last week they stalled and said they didn’t want the Bailout, now this morning, It was Declared it has to go thru. Curious. But Bush did say the Republicans must get this Bill to Pass. Will McCain listen to Bush? Finally, Bush is telling McCain to make it so. Will Bush in a Dress listen. McCain should have listened to America and Obama to begin with. Thank you Bush( for once, you made someone listen)

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am

Obama says, “As I said before, I think that one of the things we have to determine is how we can be most helpful. It’s my sense that the most helpful thing we can do right now is, uh, to let everyone know this is a sufficiently important problem. I can be helpful, and I am prepared to be anywhere, anytime. So, uh, I think the message is, if I can be helpful, I am prepared to be there at any point.”
Bear in mind that Senator Obama wants to run the executive branch starting in January. At a moment when his country needs leadership and Congress is meeting to determine policy that will affect the executive branch for the next several months and years, he doesn’t consider his role as a Senator important enough to take part in those negotiations. “If I can be helpful,” Obama says, indicating that he doesn’t consider fulfilling his current responsibilities helpful or even desirable.
Instead he wants to let everyone know that this is a “sufficiently important problem”. Sufficiently important how? Apparently, “sufficiently important” to issue press statements, but not “sufficiently important” to get back to work for a few days. What would constitute a problem “sufficiently important” enough for him to do that? Congress needs to address a $700 billion bailout that Obama has already stated will severely restrict his policy options if he wins the elections. Doesn’t he have a “sufficiently important” interest in that, either?
Obama has another problem with returning to Washington, one that received little attention in the analysis of McCain’s challenge yesterday. Obama has to raise $3 million each day in order to hit his target of $100 million a month. He needs to conduct fundraisers constantly in order to make that goal. Taking three or four days off the campaign trail means a potential loss of revenue for Obama, one he can ill afford at the moment. That’s a “sufficiently important problem” that would keep Obama out of Washington.

Posted by: If I Can Be Helpful | September 25, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

If Obama insists on debating Friday night and there is no deal, Sarah Palin should be send in McCain’s stead to debate Obama. It’s appropriate for a VP candidate to stand in for the presidential candidate. I think it’s the best solution

Posted by: s.b. | September 25, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Boneheaded

Posted by: Deep Release | September 25, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

I’m embarrassed for our country that the Republicans would put such a pathetic excuse of a candidate on their ticket. McCain doesn’t even run his own campaign, Bush/Rove operatives do and they will be the ones running the country (again) if McCain is elected.

Posted by: Liz | September 25, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

McCain and Obama, campaigning still on tv and radio. Interesting to hear, endorsments continue for McCain, when he said, he would stop is endorsments and campaigning. How about setting up a Report of all the TV and radio ads, still played endorsed by McCain.

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Since when gambling on anything became the Brilliant move!

Posted by: FM | September 25, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Lindsey Graham speaks to Fox that Americans needs this, package to go through. Yet all the Republicans, including McCain, were against the bill. So This means according to Lindsey Graham, The Republicans were wrong? All last week they stalled and said they didn’t want the Bailout, now this morning, It was Declared it has to go thru. Curious. But Bush did say the Republicans must get this Bill to Pass. Will McCain listen to Bush? Finally, Bush is telling McCain to make it so. Will Bush in a Dress listen. McCain should have listened to America and Obama to begin with. Thank you Bush( for once, you made someone listen)

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Either way, the lobbyists win again. It will be interesting to see who profits and who loses–but we already know who is going to pay the tab.

Posted by: Joel | September 25, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

This has everything to do with Palin, they don’t want her to debate Biden at all cost, he would destroy any inkling that she has a clue.
So how do you stop this debate?
Replace her debate with a Obama vs. McCain debate, but there are only three debates, so you cancel one…this one!
Anyone paying attention knows, that McCain knows nothing about economics, he has admitted to this already, so why cancel a debate to adress an issue that you know nothing about?!

Posted by: Stefan | September 25, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

This is grandstanding and political posturing, plain and simple. McCain’s first reaction a week ago, was that the “fundamentals of the economy” were strong. Then he lied about what he meant in saying that. Then he wanted to fire the SEC chairman. Then he said he hadn’t even read the bailout proposal. Then, suddenly, he decided that the crisis couldn’t be solved without his “leadership” and unilaterally decided to postpone the debate. It is an outrage. He is acting like a child.

Posted by: jon in maryland | September 25, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Listen… McCain is simply trying to postpone the VP debate as long as possible. The goal here is to move the 1st pres debate into the slot of the VP debate. Palin’s ratings are dropping and they are worried it will only get worse for her once she goes up against Biden. Mail-in votes start mid-October and they are trying to push the VP debate to after that time, just like they are trying to push Troopergate beyond that date as well. McCain is running scared.

Posted by: PA Voter | September 25, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

If I can be helpful He is a empty suit.
One of the two of these people will soon be the leader of the free world.Time to reach out figure it out and hammer it out.Get there they both have experts and advisers keep throwing ideas out till it all makes sense for all americans not just wall street.Stop the band-aids on the bullet holes

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

LOOK HE IS CAMPAIGNING!!!
McLier, hee hee

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

LOOK HE IS CAMPAIGNING!!!
McLier, hee hee

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am

LOOK HE IS CAMPAIGNING!!!
In his speech right now he said he is no longer campaigning.
McLier, hee hee

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

The Great White Geriatric Hope Hero has been officially validated into being a P TO THE U AND S S Y.
Translation: Obama just finished off the McCain campaign’s MILKSHAKE.
The funny thing is that in Political Science classes all over the country, John McCain will be the laughing stock of all Presidential campaigns.
After all, what else would you expect from a committee of clowns?
POTUS OBAMA – HOW EASY IT IS…….

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 25, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Mccain says “postpone campaigning!”
yesterday
this morning
in a few moments
he is giving a press conference on the economy?
wtf?

Posted by: dl | September 25, 2008, 9:24 am 9:24 am

its all a ploy. ALL a ploy. he’ll come out with an ad
“Mccain suspended his campaign to work on the bill, OBama was still trying to get elected, mccain country first”
just watch.
This is a stupid , stupid man underestimating the American people.
I am tired of paying taxes to bail out all the rich republican friends at AIG, Fannie and mae.
We’ve seen it before, haliburton ripping people off, Donald Rumsfeld’s Avian flu deception, the iraq war.
ALL LIES.
no more. NO MORE!
vote Obama. Vote obama/Biden

Posted by: voter in PA | September 25, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Obama and the democrats ignored and then blocked any regulations the the “De-Regulators” wanted that could of avert much of this problem Stop voting party lines

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

I don’t buy the tale told here. IF this crisis really is what we’re being told, and McCain believes it as well, he would, as a serious public servant, want to be in the middle of it. How can one do that if they’re still in media-mode? Obama clearly has no taste for this fight that may be shaping up over the bailout. He barely started to get a little traction on transforming himself from ObamaShow to typical cynical politician, and now he has to deal with THIS? snot fair

Posted by: bluecollarbytes | September 25, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

Absolutely brilliant. McCain is working for Americans. Obama is practicing for HIS debate.
Country First Baby!

Posted by: McCain Dem | September 25, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I think Senator McCain is losing it (and I am not saying this to be mean). Has anyone else noticed that his left eye barley opens? A friend of mine who is a medical doctor said that this often happens when an individual suffers a stroke. IF this is true, then putting Gov. Palin “a heartbeat away from the presidency” is a truly scary thought.

Posted by: sinkingslowly | September 25, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

The even funnier scenario is that McCain thinks he can bounce back from this with a straight face and think he’s back in the running.
Silly Geriatric…..Tricks are for kids.
THIS WILL BE A MASSIVE LANDSLIDE.
OBAMA/BIDEN – IT’S A LOCK

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 25, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

This one is easy..send Biden and Palin to Ole Miss and let the top of each ticket go back to DC…simply flip flop the dates of both debates.Each VP candidate HAS to beable tostep in whenwvwe calleon for the good of hte Nation, lets see who is/isnt up to the job.

Posted by: Col. M E Leonard(Ret). | September 25, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

to all those saying McCain is looking out for Americans …and this isn’t for himself…
Mccain says “postpone campaigning!”
yesterday
this morning
in a few moments
he is giving a press conference on the economy?
wtf?

Posted by: dl | September 25, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

Bonkers. Now he is stealing Obama’s points in his address to the CGI. Bonkers, McCain has become scary.

Posted by: AYC | September 25, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am

same team
same tactics
same garbage that got us here for 8 years.
throw McCain and the bums out!

Posted by: dl | September 25, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

this was a political reset of his campaign
his campaign manager is in trouble after a week of blaming obama hes caught with his hands, no himself completely in the cookie jar
after a week of completely off messaging, confused stumblings and flip flops, and no clear idea of what was going on
with his campaign getting extremely neagative attack after attack realizing they were opening themselves up for a backlash
and mccain slipping in the polls
are the reasons he had to stop his campaign… he needs to take a time out
i mean look at it, the bill is already almost 98% complete, mccain says hes rushing back to DC, yet he stays in new york, does some interviews, cancels others…
he didnt even care about the crisis, hes calling the economy strong, and suddenly 8 days after the crisis, suddenly everything needs to stop something has to be done
i hope americans view this for what it is, just terrible terrible leadership
there have been debates during crisis before
this is jsut cheap

Posted by: Bhrandon | September 25, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

And even more hilarious is that McCain still has very blind and stupid followers with nothing more than lemming mentalities.
This is your hero?
This is your John Wayne?
This is your straight, errr s*** Talker?
Obama just drank your milkshakes!
NOTE TO CYNIC BRAIN:
A Donkey will never win a thoroughbred horse race. (Even if you add lipstick)
POTUS OBAMA – HOW EASY IT IS

Posted by: Nat Turner | September 25, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

This one is easy..send Biden and Palin to Ole Miss and let the top of each ticket go back to DC…simply flip flop the dates of both debates.Each VP candidate HAS to be able to step in when ever called on for the good of the Nation, lets see who is/isnt up to the job.

Posted by: Col. M E Leonard(Ret). | September 25, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

So that does not mean he is campaigning just keeping the world abreast.

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

At 72, McCain has certainly lost his bearings.
Last week, Sen. McCain said the fundamentals of the economy were strong.
To Katie Couric, he said that the country faces its worst crisis since World War II.

Posted by: hank | September 25, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

OMG: McCain is on tv right now discussing what sounds like his energy policy. He couldn’t delay that. He’s scared to debate.
What a lying bastard.

Posted by: Mr. Coffee | September 25, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

McCain is campaigning right, running on Obamas Platform.
Now no matter who you vote for, you are voting Obama. So now Obama wins.
Do we now change his name to McBama?

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am

Hi all, J. McCain did a daring step, though it was a smart decision.
We all know that the crisis in Economy is only since the DEMS took over the Seante house.
and therefore we are suufering with this all s** bank after bank will go collapse.
Yet; when McCain went there he will try to explain, and do something.
well, we all know that the DEMS can face it that they are the fault here. of-course they’ll say its bushes fault, hey! why not?
hey let me ask you, when did it start going down? huh?
let me ask you, after 9/11 when the stocks went down, NO ONE predict that it will go up that fast.
and?… it did! bottom line. Since the DEMS took over the house, they messed up! they screwed us! yeah… hopefully the GOP will not only be in the white house, they will take back the BOTH houses, and put it back to the old good days…
good bless america.
McCain/Pailin ’08

Posted by: Sambro | September 25, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

McCain is campaigning right, running on Obamas Platform.
Now no matter who you vote for, you are voting Obama. So now Obama wins.
Do we now change his name to McBama?

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Desperate! He’s losing in NC now. What would you do guys and gals. He is down in Colorado by 9, down in Michigan by 10, down in Virginia by 7, down tied in Florida, For God sakes he is Obama is demolishing McCain in Iowa by 15. McCain now only has a 4 point edge in WV. I would hit the reset button on my campaign to if i were getting crushed like this. I think its definitely going to tank his numbers even lower. More importantly, you begin to see support withdraw from him. It’s embarrasing.

Posted by: Ken | September 25, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Desperate! He’s losing in NC now. What would you do guys and gals. He is down in Colorado by 9, down in Michigan by 10, down in Virginia by 7, down tied in Florida, For God sakes he is Obama is demolishing McCain in Iowa by 15. McCain now only has a 4 point edge in WV. I would hit the reset button on my campaign to if i were getting crushed like this. I think its definitely going to tank his numbers even lower. More importantly, you begin to see support withdraw from him. It’s embarrasing.

Posted by: Ken | September 25, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

McCain returns to Washington to lobby for his lobbyists, who are at play in the bail out proposals.

Posted by: greta | September 25, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

How obviously one-sided is this reporting? ABC only has Dems on to state what they think of McCains decisions, but where are those that think what McCain is doing is noble? It’s obvious who cares about his country and who only cares about winning the election. When ABC interviews Chris Dodd about what he thinks–it’s completely laughable. Here you have the Senator (Dodd) that proposed the Bill that got us into the mortgage mess we’re in while pocketing more money than anyone else on capital hill (next to Obama)and giving billions to his Morgage buddies. Where is the reporting of these facts? If the mortgage industry goes socialist–the Dems will get their way. Goodbye free market–hello government controlled mortgages, health care and who knows what’s next. We’ve seen how the government runs everythings else they can get their hands on. Obama and the Dems are Marxist (Progressive). Obama has made no effort to hide this. Is this what we want for our country? Or do we want someone who will set aside the political games and do something? Obama is an absentee Senator. He’s done absolutely nothing while in office except run for President. He is the most liberal/socialist Senator on the Hill. Is this what we want? I want a true leader and ABC should interview a few people who feel that way (there are millions of us). Stop the favoritism and let’s try being objective for a change. Didn’t you learn anything after the Gibson/Palin interview? Total biased news coverage is pathetic. The American people are not that stupid. Hopefully the American people will be able to overcome this liberal bias and see the truth throught the lies. The Marxist way of thinking is to make everyone believe that we can’t get by without government intervention. The Dems are trying to scare everyone into a government dependent country. It didn’t work too well for Russia–why do we want that here?

Posted by: Kafen | September 25, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Yeah! Whey go to Washington to work on the economy! It’s not like McCain and Obama are sitting US Congressmen who are COLLECTING A SALARY TO DO A JOB!
McCain has called for more debates all along, just like Slick Willy said in that interview, he is putting of this one to show leadership and get the problem solved in Washington by finding a compromise the republicans can accept.
Obama on the other hand has to be dragged like a whiny little baby that he is, and who is doing the dragging? Who “summoned” Obama to Washington. His mentor, George Bush.

Posted by: Boris | September 25, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

He was not campaigning he was scheduled to do this for clinton the news media picked up the feed

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

“A PLOY he is hurtung and b=needs a new tatic…..He is a piece of junk ”
If it wasn’t for him and other pieces of “junk” like him you’d be speaking German, Russian or be a lamp shade right now.
Leftist scumbag.

Posted by: Boris | September 25, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

I love the entertainment of these blogs so much

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

A running mate untested on the national stage? Which one? Biden’s been around long enough to be tested. How’s he doing? We’ve seen him talking about his high IQ. But which troubles you most? That Sarah Palin couldn’t figure out which of four Bush doctrines Charlie Gibson was asking about, or that Joe Biden believes FDR was President when the stock market crashed and that TV had been already been invented in 1929?

Posted by: Tracy Lynn | September 25, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

mcain is certainly not afraid of debating obama this friday. obama’s response to a national economic crisis is to say call me if you need me but i am staying on the campaign trial to raise cash and prepare for the coming debate. this rescue package is certainly a big deal and requires leadership and risk taking. obama has shown neither. mccain is reluctant to support this package and many republicans in congress also have concerns so mccain can show leadership by going to washington. sen. dodd and rep. frank and sen. obama along with many democrats were deep in the hole for fannie mae and freddie mac as well as for pushing the private sector to lower their lending standards so everyone could own a home even though they may not be able to truly afford it. liberal democratic politics in the capital markets is the true root reason for this mess. proper oversight by gov’t was also lax. mcain as far back as 2005 noted the problem with fannie and freddie and proposed true reform but the democrats opposed it and now the chickens have come home to roost.

Posted by: tom | September 25, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Obama the perpetual grad student who thinks taking tests is substitute for real world expereince. He would rather blather on about some question Jim Lehrer asks than come to DC and actually show us what he claimed he would do.

Posted by: geevill | September 25, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Appearing on Good Morning America Thursday, Clinton told ABC News’ Chris Cuomo that McCain’s push to postpone the debate would only be a good political move if both candidates agreed. McCain announced on Wednesday that he would “suspend” his presidential campaign to come to Washington to help negotiate a financial bailout bill “We know he didn’t do it because he’s afraid because Sen. McCain wanted more debates,” Clinton said, adding that he was “encouraged” by the joint statement from McCain and Sen. Barack Obama.
“You can put it off a few days the problem is it’s hard to reschedule those things,” Clinton said, “I presume he did that in good faith since I know he wanted — I remember he asked for more debates to go all around the country and so I don’t think we ought to overly parse that.”

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

ABC news is as irrevelant as any of the drive by’s. You LIB’s keep listening to them for your news, and when NOV. 4th comes you are going to be depressed AND surprised when the American people reject this empty suit Obama.

Posted by: Randy | September 25, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Newsweek reports that McCain campaign manager Rick Davis “has remained the treasurer and a corporate director of his lobbying firm this year, despite repeated statements by campaign officials that he had ended his relationship with the firm in 2006.”
Don’t be fooled by John McCain.

Posted by: greta | September 25, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Bill Clinton for McCain what is that the 5th or 6th time he has deffened McCain I bet He will pull the lever for McCain

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

This is a ploy. Now there is talk of delaying the VP debate. Anyone who has seen Ms. Palin’s three interviews is not surprised. This is a plan. I don’t think the American people will see it any differently. Look at the polls on whether this debate should go forward. Most agree that it should.

Posted by: Same Ol' Politics | September 25, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I find it amazing so many people think that a man who skips work 40% of the time is qualified for promotion. Check Obamas attendance record, voting record.

Posted by: Nona | September 25, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

100% bonehead on McCain part, I expected him to show leadership and not pull a stunt like this. Obama is looking more presidential each day and McCain/Palin is trying every trick in the book/excuse to run away from the debate. What a shame McCain lost my vote.

Posted by: Randy | September 25, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Nona, check McCain’s attendance, voting record this year. C’mon let’s talk about issues.

Posted by: huh? | September 25, 2008, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Of course Obama wont go to washington, he have no ideas for thsi crisis, thsi f* fdems messed up there, and he is a part of it (well, he never voted, because he have no idea whats all about, was just sitting there and trying to act cool).
of course, he wont go to wipe off thier crap, because he cant! he is NOT experiance, he/they are experiance in messsing up!
DEMS! eat your sh* its your fault!

Posted by: Jhon | September 25, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

When the self-descripbed DE-REGULATOR runs from debate/reporter to solve a major problem caused by DE_REGULATION somthing smells….IT’S THE SLIDING POLL NUMBERS, STUPID…..now there you have it why as to why McCain looks like wearing a GIMMICK-suit.

Posted by: jamie | September 25, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

ANCHORAGE, Alaska — The McCain campaign is speaking for the Alaska state government these days, especially when it wants to ensure that nothing embarrassing about Gov. Sarah Palin emerges before Election Day.
Questions for the Palin administration are most often answered by McCain staffers, including Meghan Stapleton, a former Palin spokeswoman; Taylor Griffin, who worked for President Bush’s campaigns in 2000 and 2004; and Ed O’Callaghan, a McCain campaign lawyer and former federal prosecutor from New York.
They have clamped down on information flowing out of state government, especially when it comes to the so-called Troopergate investigation. The inquiry centers on whether Palin abused her power by firing the public safety commissioner after he refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper. The McCain group even attached a “truth squad” moniker to Troopergate news conferences this week.
The presidential race has kept Palin out of Alaska for all but three days since Sen. John McCain announced on Aug. 29 that he had chosen her as his running mate. This week, Palin was in New York for her first-ever meetings with world leaders, a trip to the World Trade Center site and an interview with CBS’ Katie Couric.
Even Palin’s lieutenant governor, Sean Parnell, said keeping in touch has been difficult. And since hackers broke into Palin’s Yahoo e-mail account last week, he said, it has dropped off entirely.
“Until she was hacked, we were communicating just about daily. Now I’m talking with her chief of staff,” Parnell said. “I saw her in person when she came home about a week ago, but I haven’t spoken to her since.”
In Palin’s absence, messages left with the governor’s office are usually returned by the McCain campaign. A recent request for information was answered by a governor’s spokesman with a sad smile and a shake of the head.

Posted by: kurt | September 25, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

McCain with a panic stricken look on his face is not the person that should be in charge, and when you can’t do more than one thing at a time, it just makes him look worse…

Posted by: Mark I. | September 25, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Spin it anyway you want. McCain is putting country first. He’s doing the job that he’s being paid to do. Will Obama?
Why would McCain try to avoid a foreign policy debate? You libs and your conspiracies…priceless.

Posted by: mustang.freddy | September 25, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

So, if McCain gets elected and Afghanistan starts acting up while we’re in Iraq, is he going to ask Iraq to wait a week while he takes care of the Taliban? Gimme a break. Welcome to the 21st century. You don’t need to physically be in a place to do business there, and you sure as hell better be able to take care of two (or more!) important pieces of business at once. McCain hadn’t even read the president’s proposal until this past Tuesday. Did it take him four days to find his reading glasses? This is a ploy by McCain to get some time and traction in the polls by latching onto the crisis and looking like he cares, plain and simple.

Posted by: Bri | September 25, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

After Obama refuses to take part, with McCain in Town Hall Meetings, Obama and his talking heads are now attacking McCain for putting the “debate” on hold until the economic crisis is somewhat resolved. Amazing.
It just goes to show:
Obama = “DO NOTHING” Candidate
McCain steps up — and once again
Obama sits and waits to figure out what to do.

Posted by: NielPA | September 25, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

I think it’s both brilliant and boneheaded – kind of like Obama’s team portraying Hillary as a racist. Politics is underhanded, and Obama already knows this. But on the real side – if the economy is in dire straights such that we need to collect 3k/person to donate to Wall St., then they shouldnt be debating and should take care of this issue. Who needs to hear them quibble about Iraq, when they should be in the Senate getting this stuff taken care of ?

Posted by: Angry Black Democrat | September 25, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

dear – huh.
Did Obama vote at all? he never knew what to do, so he was always undecided!
he has a crepy mind…
yes, im a racict! talk to the point, dont tell me you know what you gonna do to the economy! you messed it up DEMS.
yea! all of you!

Posted by: jhon | September 25, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Boneheaded to be sure. I he is suspending his campaign, replace him with Ron Paul so we can hear more truth.

Posted by: Ben Straub | September 25, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

“We know he didn’t do it because he’s afraid because Sen. McCain wanted more debates,” Clinton said, adding that he was “encouraged” by the joint statement from McCain and Sen. Barack Obama.
“You can put it off a few days the problem is it’s hard to reschedule those things,” Clinton said, “I presume he did that in good faith since I know he wanted — I remember he asked for more debates to go all around the country and so I don’t think we ought to overly parse that.”

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Your own GOD President clinton The one you say was the greatest Pres of all time see he is not ducking and doing the right thing

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

the “CHOSEN ONE” lifts his arms and Spake ” economy heal thyself” or call me if you need me I need to be out here to tell people what I will do instead of actually doing an real work in case I get blamed for it…Vote “PRESENT” oh sorry ..he did get 500 mil, for ACORN so he could steal info for vote..
Chris Dodd Housing, Barney Franks banking,Raines 90 million fannie pay off Clinton adviser now Obama’s, Rangel don’t pay taxes, rezco slum lord obama got him 14 million,Wright,G.D.America Clinton NAFTA Clinton Deregulated for his global world economy for theives to borrow..ALL DEMOCRATS, Crroks liars and theives…

Posted by: Debbie | September 25, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Dear BRI;
is this about that McCain cant aim on 2 things in one shot?
Hell no!
he is in seante, isnt he? this ass hole obama should ran there as well!
its part of his job, thats why he is a Sen. why the hell isnt he there? doing his job!
why are we paying tax, and he is getting a wage there?
why??
answer me why the hell he is out of his office for the last 2 year. ohh he is campagining??
hey!!! there is a crisi going on. OBAMA you cant do 2 things in 1 shot? campaining and taking action on the crisis?
hey!!! you are getting paid!!! get back to DC and let me hear your voice what you say, say what??
this ass hole never said something honorable.
OBAMA HAVE NO PLAN, thats why he fight for not pushing off the debate.
again, you cant do 2 things in 1 shot?? campagining and taking action??
then get lost!!
McCain sarah ’08

Posted by: Jhon | September 25, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

What a DRAMA QUEEN McCain is!
Is this the kind of leadership America needs? Lurching from one position to the next like a drunk at closing time?
Another hasty bad decision to cover his last hasty bad decision.
SARAH PALIN IS NOT QUALIFIED AND EVERYONE KNOWS IT, JOHN.
NO POINT IN TRYING TO HIDE IT ANY MORE.
YOU MADE A MISTAKE>
ADMIT IT.
McCAIN = CUT AND RUN COWARD.

Posted by: Ed from MA | September 25, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

It’s comforting to see when the Obama camp is confronted with a surprise, first they panic, then they get angry, then they become cynical.
That’s not leadership. That’s greed. I don’t think we can expect Obama to be any better at fixing these problems as long as he demonstrates the same character as the people who created them.

Posted by: len | September 25, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

“We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.”
“Fool me once Shame on you Fool me twice Shame on me.”

Posted by: newz4i | September 25, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

We are gonna have Chicken Little McCain for diner on Friday evening.
Chicken Little is running to hide behind Furher Bush in Washington DC.
We need a max man to pick Chicken Little from behind the bushes.
We can not miss our Friday diner.
Oh dear I am salivating.

Posted by: Steve_NJ | September 25, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

McCain woosed out of the debate and thinks he’s doing something to help with the bailout, what is it that he’s going to offer?….

Posted by: Mark I. | September 25, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

STEVE KROFT: What qualifies you to be President of the United States?
BARACK OBAMA: Something that I think I bring to bear to this process is the capacity to bring diverse people together around a common goal. And I think more than anything, that’s what America needs right now: the ability for us to unite around a common-sense, practical, non-ideological effort to solve some very big problems that we face
READ THAT AGAIN
“that’s what America needs right now: the ability for us to unite around a common-sense, practical, non-ideological effort to solve some very big problems that we face”
McCain is th eone doing that. Not Obama

Posted by: geevill | September 25, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Who’s McCain think that he’s fooling –”Country First” my a**; IT’S “POLITICS FIRST”!!! Only this time, the American People will see just how dishonorable he has become [just to get elected]!

Posted by: Howard Gallas | September 25, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Dear Ed from MA;
Yes, we gotta foucs on the issues what happening now, not only fouces on issues that its stupid adds.
yes! they should go back and discuss the crisis.
could be that you are sittting at home and not working. but we are working and loosing money daily.
we need they should handke it ASAP, the dems messed up here! and face the fact!
this is it. since they came into the house it start going down the road…
McCain will help this grwoing up back.

Posted by: Jhon | September 25, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

I admire his decision..do the job you were elected to do.

Posted by: zeke | September 25, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Paulson published the text of his plan on Sep 19th (available on line by the 20th at the latest).
On Tues Sep 23rd, in an interview with Tom Beres, McCain said of Paulson’s two and a half page plan:
“I have not had a chance to see it in writing. I have to examine it.”
Obviously, John didn’t see this as a crisis to review Paulson’s plan until he saw the polls and scandals affecting his campaign yesterday.

Posted by: cleduc | September 25, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

You people need to read up on mr O he does not debate well he is the one playing politics trying to make like McCain is scared ask yourself this question who wanted more debates at more states mor cities who would only agree to three?

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

You know what, we don’t pay these guys to run for office. We don’t pay them to fly all over creating telling lies and making empty promises. We pay them to represent us in the US Senate. Obama thinks he doesn’t need to do his day job, he will “get a call if he’s needed”. That sounds SO MUCH LIKE Bush and all his vacations. So we are swapping a liberal Bush for the current Bush? I am supposed to be comforted by that? I am supposed to care more about a dog and pony show debate where they’ll make a million promises NEITHER will keep over the REAL LIFE situation of the financial industry? Even the independant analysts say we are facing a SEVERE financial crisis… ALL OF THESE Guys that we “elect” need to get their sorry Butts to Washington NOW and come up with a solution. Oh, and we the american taxpayers, who are footing the bill for this nonsense.. We want transparency for ALL THE DETAILS. IF this is too much for BO, he’s not ready to be president.

Posted by: I can't believe these politicians | September 25, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Obama looks as Presidential as that Iranian bafoon at the U.N. Love the worlld..How the world is going to be destroyed. the sky is falling Obama save us..Saves us we don’t know true freedom we love to choke on our social issues. we don’t want people to be their best we want them to be drones like us..
Pelosi,Reid,Dodds,Franks,Rezco,Wright,Phleger,Raines, no oil,no wind,no america

Posted by: Debbie | September 25, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

McCain needed to cancel the debate for reasons other than polls numbers….health reasons. Have you seen his left eye lately? It is droopy like he had a stroke. Then he quickly hires a $5000 per day makeup artist. Curious. Any facial ticks, imperfections, etc. are compounded in high definition. Any one seeing this eye thing in high def would immediately question his ability to survive a full term. Then the question becomes the qualifications of Caribou “I can see Russia from my house” Barbie. I worked at a bank once, can I be Secretary of the Treasury now? McCain needed a few more days for the meds to kick in to help his eye thing hence this stunt to cancel the debate.

Posted by: Elaine | September 25, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

boneheaded

Posted by: dotheresearch | September 25, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

who scars from debates?
when did Obama gave for anyone that much interview how McCain gave?
come one! dont let your mind beeing drived from this stupid ABC news.

Posted by: Jhon | September 25, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

This is worse than Katrina Call me if i am needed Hey Paulson you doing a heck of a job Thats what Obama should be saying right now

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am

Obama went to Congress on Easter weekend to deliberate on the Terry Schiavo madness – and voted for the legislation. But he thinks this is just play. LOL. What a pathetic excuse for change.

Posted by: Angry Black Democrat | September 25, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Once again, Obama shows he’s just fluff.
Obama = All mouth – no action
At least McCain stepped up– I give McCain alot of credit.
Obama = “DO NOTHING” candidate

Posted by: NielPA | September 25, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Posted by: Ed from MA | September 25, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Is that his answer if elected President…call me if you need me???…
I’m sorry, I can’t go do my job because I have a television appearance scheduled! Priorities man, priorities.

Posted by: zeke | September 25, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Anyone want to place a bet on Palin debating Obama in Miss, while McCain passes the Bill Friday night? Now that’s politics!

Posted by: s.b. | September 25, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

If Obama can go back to Congress to vote to keep Terry Schiavo on life support, then he can do this. HE’S the one who is boneheaded.

Posted by: Angry Black Democrat | September 25, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am

geevill: No Bill Clinton did not. I am sure thousands saw Larry King last night. Stop spreading your lies. What is wrong with you Republicans… do you not know what the definition of TRUTH means? Being honest. I am soooo sick of the crap.
NO McCain is a joke… an empty suite with nothing but more of same… if there is anything left for him to destroy….

Posted by: beck | September 25, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Obama needs to do his job. His is not elected to prepare for a debate. It too much to ask him to do 1 single thing that is for the country, SELF_CENTERED AND EXPOSED = OBAMA! Need to prepare for debate, cannot deal with economy. Harry Reid said they needed to know if John McCain was going to support the bill and I believe he got his answer. Not as you idiots have proposed!

Posted by: ubu1991 | September 25, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Want to place a bet on Palin debating Obama while McCain passes the bill on Friday night! Now that’s politics!

Posted by: s.b. | September 25, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

It is brilliant. He is doing the hard work that Americans needs. He is the change he need- Bipartisian work and resolve. Obama panders. McCain goes in the rooms and cuts deals. He is good at doing that.
Obama has never cut a deal except with the devil.

Posted by: Knight | September 25, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

Obama says call me if you need me to Paulson; now that’s funny.
Last I checked, Obama is still a senator on the voter’s payroll.
Obama–why don’t you go to Washington and get to work.
Seems “do nothing” Obama is once again sitting the fence, with this fingers to the political wind–afraid to make any decisions or give any solutions to the ecomonic crisis.
Obama waited until McCain came up with a plan about the economic crisis, then Obama came out and adopted practically the same plan as McCain. Obama is a joke.
Just watch McCain and Obama closely–it’s so obvious Obama really doesn’t know what to do.

Posted by: NielPA | September 25, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Oh, by the way, I love the way Bush made this issue out to be everyones fault but his and the people responsible for it. Bush and his cabinets and the people he hired to oversee this stuff DROPPED THE BALL, THEY WAS TO BUSY DOING NOTHING BUT RAKING IN OUR MONEY BY RIPPING US OFF. I hate the way the Republicans…including McCain take an awful situation that they themselves have created, and then act like they are our saviors, our angles in waiting… Today I am mad, sick and tired of the whole thing and I can’t wait for Nov. 4th.

Posted by: beck | September 25, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

Brilliant move by Mccain. A debate will not fix the economy. Obama loses.

Posted by: brigitte | September 25, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

the republican bus is flying off the cliff and they want to drag the country with them, time to make a change…

Posted by: Mark I. | September 25, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

While McCain has been telling us all how strong our economy is,Obama warned of this fall-out several times beginning in March 2007. Obama penned a substantial letter to Chairman Bernanke and Secretary Paulson about the consequences of the current path the American Economy was on and that the mortgage crisis must be addressed. That letter was written 18 months ago.
Vote vision and judgement. Obama/Biden

Posted by: Paige | September 25, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Let’s see…
On one hand you have McCain willing to suspend his Presidential campaign to go work on resolving this banking crisis. He also requested to postpone the debate be postponed until a deal on the bailout bill is in place.
On the other hand, Obama says he will only go to Washington if he is needed and wants to debate on foreign issues Friday. Incidentally, Obama refused 10 debates over the summer.
Both McCain and Obama are running for President- highest office in the land- and Obama believes his input or involvement is what, “above his pay grade?” Obama is not showing good judgment or LEADERSHIP skills. Now that Bush asked him to show up because Bush knows both McCain and Obama represent the future president and their involvement is important. At least now Obama can show up and vote “Present.”

Posted by: Gus in Chicago | September 25, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

McCain gambles as usual. Is that what our country needs right now?

Posted by: the gambler maverick | September 25, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am

NielPA – Your candidate is the MOST ABSENT MEMBER of Congress. McCain managed to beat out two other members battling brain tumors for the prize. You nor your candidate who has missed more votes than ANY other member of Congress, need to be calling anyone out on work ethic. The only reason McCain is interested in getting back to Washington for this is because the polls tell his that’s what is in HIS best interest.

Posted by: Paige | September 25, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

If McCain wanted to help with the process he would not draw so much attention to it by having a prime time interview on CBS News. As usual he puts his campaign first. Most people that I know see it as a stunt.

Posted by: Debate is OK | September 25, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

While they may be saying this is a bold move on message boards and tv – they are really shocked at McCain’s judgement. The people out there defending McCain are paid to do it or just cannot stand to lose at ALL cost. No one truly believes that he did this for any reason other than the fact that he is panicked and regrets the Palin choice.

Posted by: donald | September 25, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

MCCAIN IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT…THE COUNTRY COMES FIRST,….WE CAN HAVE THE DEBATE AFTER WE GET THIS ECONOMIC CRISIS ACTION TAKE CARE OF….WE CAN CERTAINLY MOVE THE DEBAT BACK A WEEK.

Posted by: John Pen | September 25, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

McCain’s campaign is ultimately trying to cancel the VP debate and push out the foreign policy debate, which is his strength. A patriotic move, I think not.

Posted by: First | September 25, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

DE-REGULATION screwed the economy, and the self-described DE-REGULATOR running to fix that problem, and here is his qualifications:
1. ranked 894th out of 899 in military school
2. picked a VP candidate who got a D economics while switching 8 colleges to squeeze our a college degree
3. The architect of DE-REGULATION (Phil Gram) is his economic adviser.
4. He has no experience/association with the banking comity whatsoever
5. Stated 18 times in last few months, including the day 700b disaster was surfaced, “Our fundamental of economy are strong”
So, after all the above if anyone beleives McCain’s move is a smart one, then you are as “BONEheaded” as anyone can be…so is McCain’s move.

Posted by: susan | September 25, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Brilliant move? I don’t think so, Obama should call his bluff show up and answer questions even if McCain is not there. This is another McCain stunt. BTW…McCain is starting to look and act older. Even yesterday the camera angle for his announcement let the scar on his face show, which they usually hide, this making him look worse. Then today we see the REAL reason for this, the McCain campaign is suggesting that McCain and Obama debate in place of the VP candidates next week. THAT is the real goal here, Palin is looking worse and worse even in the few interviews she has done. The debate prep must be going VERY badly. This is just another cheap stunt. Presidents must remain calm and act stable. McCain is looking old, irrational and phony. His running mate is proving she is not ready for prime time.

Posted by: DMR | September 25, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Absolutely brilliant. McCain is working for Americans. Obama is practicing for HIS debate.
Country First Baby!
Posted by:

Posted by: John Pen | September 25, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Why does Obama wait until others come out with the real “answers”; then he comes out and steals other candidates platform.
Obama did the same thing in the primaries with Clinton.
Just when the voters were finally catching on to Obama’s total lack of judgement and experience in the primaries, Obama pulls the Michigan and Florida debacle.
Michigan and Florida voters really got the short end of the stick in the primary; as well as Hillary Clinton.
Obama just can’t seal the deal because he just doesn’t have what it takes to be president.

Posted by: NielPA | September 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

John Pen,
How is McCain right? what is he going to offer to fix the problem, he admitted he knows nothing about the economy, he’s just playing games and now everybody sees it…

Posted by: Mark I. | September 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Brilliant – for both campaign leverage and for forcefully breaking govt SOP. He can help the country and himself at the same time.
For all those who want to blame Repubs -IMHO everyone is to blame. From the deregulation repubs, the “housing for everyone” democrats, the “mark to market” advocates, the people who could call hearings on predatory lending but not securitization of ephemeral financial products, a SOX law which tells you everything and nothing, the wealth vs wages nature of American economy, direct and indirect (401(k)) shareholders, an American system too reliant on credit and foreign investors, homeowners who shouldn’t have bought houses, bankers who shouldn’t have made the loans … there’s plenty too go around in a culture that often favors the quick, big win over more sustainable benefits.

Posted by: Robin | September 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

If Winston Churchill can come to the US under cloak of night in December 1941 to deliver a speech to the US Congress while England was under attack, Johnny McCain can get his saggy fanny down to Mississippi.
Anything else is cowardly and PROVES he’s afraid to debate

Posted by: Witch King | September 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

You all miss the point entirely. If we don’t settle this financial crisis, a debate about foreign policy will be moot–because in short order, the US will lose its AAA+ credit rating meaning the rest of the world will not readily buy our bonds to fund our deficit spending. China already is making moves to limit its exposure to the US Treasury.
I am sorry to say that McCain gets this issue and Obama doesn’t. I have tried to gain some confidence in Obama that he is what he says he is and not a socialist isolationist class warfare idealogue that his record indicates. Recently my take on Obama is that he is just another well spoken politician with his own interests at heart, not mine or the nation’s.
I would really like to have my mind changed because I am completely disillusioned with both parties. I am tired of gotcha politics, scoring points in the mainstream media and dumbed down “debates.”
At least McCain will roll up his sleeves and wade right in up to his shoulders, while Obama pontificates and snipes from a distance.
Score this one for McCain.
How ironic that the world’s most successful democracy must now pay

Posted by: Road Warrior | September 25, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

MCCAIN IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT…THE COUNTRY COMES FIRST,….WE CAN HAVE THE DEBATE AFTER WE GET THIS ECONOMIC CRISIS ACTION TAKE CARE OF….WE CAN CERTAINLY MOVE THE DEBAT BACK A WEEK.

Posted by: John Pen | September 25, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Brilliant or boneheaded? Wrong question. I’d say the question ought to be whether McCain is a serious or childish candidate.
I think its getting harder and harder to see him as a serious candidate.

Posted by: Paul | September 25, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

I am ashamed of his political pandering attitude towards our economic problems. I don’t think he can balance his ersonal checkbook, so what can he add to this crisis but more of the same with additional pandering for photo ops.
It is a boneheaded move on his campaigns part to avoid the debate with Obama He wanted 10 townhalls and all of a sudden he is using this as a reason to keep him and his weak choice for VP out of the debates!!
GET REAL JOHN McCAIN

Posted by: Lou | September 25, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

Typo corrected
I am ashamed of his political pandering attitude towards our economic problems. I don’t think he can balance his personal checkbook, so what can he add to this crisis but more of the same with additional pandering for photo ops.
It is a boneheaded move on his campaigns part to avoid the debate with Obama. He wanted 10 townhalls and all of a sudden he is using this as a reason to keep him and his weak choice for VP out of the debates!! I say It’s time for the showdown man to man!!
GET REAL JOHN McCAIN

Posted by: Lou | September 25, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

Why NOW John? Why wait for 9 days after this breaks?
I think it has EVERYTHING to do with canceling the VP debate and the tanking poll numbers.

Posted by: Witch King | September 25, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am

I know let’s cancel the VP debate, he says…

Posted by: hmmm | September 25, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Hey when was Obama going to go Only if needed .He pushing his way in to make sure it good for US americans and if he get some votes as well GOD BLESS

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

mccain led . obama after trying to stay out ( vote present ) on a vital issue . followed like a sheep. well that is the usual pattern of his behavior

Posted by: sfernando | September 25, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

McCain is seriously touched
in the head.
You don’t want him in charge
of a 14-trillion dollar economy.

Posted by: anon | September 25, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Infantile mccain. As president this knee jerk cut and run behavior is unacceptable. Is he going to bomb Iran if he has a domestic crisis? Can he handle more than one thing at a time? No. The debate must go on and if he refuses then Palin/Biden must debate Friday – quit the games, we can’t afford this. Why wan’t mccain in the senate for the last FOUR months dealing with this economic crisis? This is embarrassing. McCain’s mental ability is in question.

Posted by: lily | September 25, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

To COL. A.M.Khajawall [Ret] MD,
I read your post and your criteria was well thought out, however I was shocked to find out that your conclusion was for Obama. That’s hilarious! Because the answer to every single point you were trying to make was JOHN MCCAIN and NOT Obama.
It’s not possible that the answer to any of those points is Obama. Not even close! It is also interesting how someone’s emotions can completely and utterly cloud any facts subsequently resulting in an opinion that is 180 degrees from reality.
May I suggest a psychiatrist?

Posted by: Ryan M. | September 25, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

If McCain is so concerned about the country losing money, why isn’t he concerned about the $5,000,000 that has already been spent getting this debate ready? Just lose it and forget it? I guess that is a drop in the bucket for him since he and his heiress have a lot more and could afford to lose that much. What about the advertisers looking forward to reaching millions of viewers and the Americans planning debate watching parties? Just let them throw their money away too? what a liar. He is just afraid of losing a debate and is desperate to atop the VP debate because Palin isn’t ready to answer questions.

Posted by: Helena Fee | September 25, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

mccain led . obama after trying to stay out ( vote present ) on a vital issue, followed like a sheep.
well being sheepish, following, and being removed from any real issue, is the usual pattern of behavior for obama.
leading ( soemtimes in unpopular and unconventional ways) is the usual pattern for mccian

Posted by: sfernando | September 25, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

McCain delays to push out the VP debate — lest we see the Emperor’s running mate has no clothes. We see. Blind followers cannot. This is a critical time in history for this nation.

Posted by: Emperor | September 25, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

We are in this financial mess because of the democrats. McCain afraid of the debate?! Give me a break. He wanted to have ten town hall meetings with Obama and being that Obama couldn’t have his telepromter with him he didn’t want to do it. Obama said he will be around if he is needed, yeah that is what we need from a president. Total lack of concern is always comforting. Weak.

Posted by: mar | September 25, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

ABC News is trying to emulate Fox News… pinhead or patriot (bonehead or brilliant)… Has it occurred to anyone that Obama’s own democratic buddies on the Hill thinks he can offer anything new or be helpful since he has not been taken up on his offer to suspend his campaign and go back to work for the American people as an elected Senator? They sure aren’t turning to him for leadership in this very crucial matter. Hmmmm?

Posted by: Fran | September 25, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

mar, deregulation has created this mess, not any particular party. republicans however, have supported deregulation as a policy much more than democrats.
debate is delayed to suspend the VP debate.

Posted by: ok | September 25, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

It was the Republicans who go us in this mess in the first place,not democrats. Obama is doing what he is supposed to be doing, getting ready for a debate. McCain is just trying to show the world that he cares about the economy! It’s just a publicity stunt gone bad. If he misses the debate tommorow,then the country won’t know his views on foreign policy. There’s not to much McCain can do,but take up space.Obama’s not trying to be somewhere he is not needed. Like Obama said “A president can multitask” he doesn’t have to suspend his whole campaign just to go to washington.McCain has a airplane and so does Obama.

Posted by: mebeingme | September 25, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

McCain says he has suspended his campaign but is running attack ads against Senator Obama in North Carolina today. (WXII-12 Winston Salem NC). I saw one around 8:05am.

Posted by: Wes Taylor | September 25, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

The debates are suppose to be about foreign policy but you know the economy will end up being involed. mccain is scared he admits to know nothing about the economy,Just last week he said the fundementals of the economy are strong he is now trying to get the vp debates cancelled how is mccain going to washington fix something he knows nothing about? he cant use the internet to communicate his cell phone you know 21st century technology people travel every day out of the country and still keep up with their jobs at home its called TECHNOLOGY. IF MCCAIN CANT HANDLE THIS CAMPAIGN THEN I SAY DROP OUT AND PUT SOMEONE IN THERE THAT CAN!

Posted by: angie | September 25, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am

This is a transparent stalling tactic to try & allow Palin more time to be brought up to speed on the issues.
She doesn’t have a grasp on the intricacies of foreign or economic policy & can only speak to these subjects in broad vague rhetorical terms. Using catch all phrases like “reform” (what does that mean? cause you can reform in exactly the wrong way) & “bipartisan” (the Republican party is responsible for obstructing almost every meaningful piece of legislation put forth by the Democratic majority this session. A record # of fillibusters) in order to have bipartisan government, typically the obstructionist party would need to hold out an olive branch, not offer more political stunts & gimmicks. The debates should go on as scheduled (both President & VP). Obama & Biden should show up at their prospective debates & if either McCain or Palin are no shows they forfeit.
There are no do overs. & for those that think Obama should be there he has accepted an invitation by Bush to assist in negotiating on this bailout. Obama is in touch with leadership EVERY DAY. McCain has not even stepped foot on Capitol hill for over 6 months. The crisis was made public nearly a week ago & now with a disasterous VP debate hanging in the balance he wants to stall…
No way, No how, No McCain!!!

Posted by: Palinator | September 25, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Obama is a bone head.
A $100,000 state grant for a botanic garden in Englewood that Barack Obama awarded in 2001 to a group headed by a onetime campaign volunteer is now under investigation by the Illinois attorney general amid new questions. (suntimes, 2008)
In otherwords Obama spent $100K of Chicago tax dollars on a badly built gazebo. Now thats a bone head you can count on.

Posted by: Norman | September 25, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

All you liberals say this and that about deregulation the truth is not deregulation that the republicans are against it is improper regulation they are against.

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

First, this bailout should be up to the American People and not the Senate/House. It’s our MONEY and we should have a say in how its spent. Second, McChicken is trying to make this a political move to benefit him!!! This information didn’t come out yesterday it’s been a week and NOW he ready to stop campaigning and head to Washington!!! LOL!!! He is a joke!!! I believe the president of the US should be able to debate and handle other issues at the same time!!!

Posted by: Stzone | September 25, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Suck on this you Obama nuts.
McCain’s statement from the Congressional Record.
Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae’s regulator reported that the company’s quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were “illusions deliberately and systematically created” by the company’s senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.
The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae’s former chief executive officer, OFHEO’s report shows that over half of Mr. Raines’ compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac.
The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator’s examination of the company’s accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs–and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO’s report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO’s report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.
I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.
I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation.
I’d say this pretty clearly refutes Barack Obama’s silly claims that John McCain is not a reformer and does not know anything about economics. One candidate is the real reformer, and it ain’t Barack Obama. By the way, the Democrats blocked the legislation McCain proposed, and it was never passed. So if you want to know why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed, leaving the taxpayers with billions of dollars in losses, blame the Congressional Democrats.
Put that in your hat and spin it.

Posted by: Kim | September 25, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

The Bailout should be out on the ballet so WE the citizens can vote on it!!! It’s our money!!!

Posted by: Stzone | September 25, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

STEVE KROFT: What qualifies you to be President of the United States?
BARACK OBAMA: Something that I think I bring to bear to this process is the capacity to bring diverse people together around a common goal. And I think more than anything, that’s what America needs right now: the ability for us to unite around a common-sense, practical, non-ideological effort to solve some very big problems that we face”
that’s what America needs right now: the ability for us to unite around a common-sense, practical, non-ideological effort to solve some very big problems that we face
Obama is endoring McCain I guess

Posted by: geevill | September 25, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am

Ryan M: “I read your post and your criteria was well thought out, however I was shocked to find out that your conclusion was for Obama.”
I’m with the retired colonel, Ryan. McCain doesn’t have the temperament nor maturity (despite his age) I’m looking for in a president.
And to me, that point seemed obvious even before this latest string of campaign stunts.

Posted by: Paul | September 25, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Suck on this you Obama Nuts.
McCain’s statement from the Congressional Record.
Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae’s regulator reported that the company’s quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were “illusions deliberately and systematically created” by the company’s senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.
The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae’s former chief executive officer, OFHEO’s report shows that over half of Mr. Raines’ compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac.
The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator’s examination of the company’s accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs–and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO’s report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO’s report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.
I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.
I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation.
I’d say this pretty clearly refutes Barack Obama’s silly claims that John McCain is not a reformer and does not know anything about economics. One candidate is the real reformer, and it ain’t Barack Obama. By the way, the Democrats blocked the legislation McCain proposed, and it was never passed. So if you want to know why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed, leaving the taxpayers with billions of dollars in losses, blame the Congressional Democrats.
Try and Spin this Please!!

Posted by: Kim | September 25, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

If McCain wants to move the debate to the night that the VP debate should take place. Why dont they move the VP debate to Friday instead. I am sure Biden is ready but I guess Sarah would not be able to handle it. If you are going to be running for such a high office, you need to be ready for anything.

Posted by: barb | September 25, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am

ahaaa!!!! This is all about McCain trying to change the VP debate.
MAJOR BONEHEAD!!!

Posted by: watching | September 25, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Typical McShame, a day late and a dollar short. The congress is putting the final touches on the bill and now McShame wants to be part of it. We can now see what kind of president he will never get to be.

Posted by: Independent realist | September 25, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

ludicrous not ludacris
Nice try Col. M E Leonard(Ret). Trying to look like a military man. What are you Col. in the hip hop or Rap army. Give me a break. Like you would have anything worthwhile to say when you cannot even spell the would ludicrous.

Posted by: Sharon | September 25, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Here’s an interesting take from a Republican and former member of Congress. McCain’s move is “somewhere on the stupidity scale between plain silly and numbingly desperate,” said former Republican congressman Mickey Edwards (OK).
My concern is whether either McCain or Obama would help in Washington. Not commenting on either’s capabilities as a legislator, but the simple fact is both are candidates for president. And that fact could actually cause either to inadvertantly damage these negotiations.
“Obama and McCain coming back will not be particularly helpful,” said House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.). “It’s just going to bring the presidential campaign into the halls of Congress directly.”
I think both should put country first and actually stay away for a while. We have people in place to deal with this. We can argue all day whether they are the right people or not, but in times of crisis, often the worst move is the emotional, kneejerk one to bypass the offices and procedures already in place for dealing with such events.
In this case, its a job for Paulson, Bachus, Frank, and to a lesser degree Shelby and Dodd. And between them, they may well now be close to something both parties and both branches of government can live with. Insert a candidate or two, and who knows what happens next.

Posted by: Paul | September 25, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Here’s an interesting take from a Republican and former member of Congress. McCain’s move is “somewhere on the stupidity scale between plain silly and numbingly desperate,” said former Republican congressman Mickey Edwards (OK).
My concern is whether either McCain or Obama would help in Washington. Not commenting on either’s capabilities as a legislator, but the simple fact is both are candidates for president. And that fact could actually cause either to inadvertantly damage these negotiations.
“Obama and McCain coming back will not be particularly helpful,” said House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.). “It’s just going to bring the presidential campaign into the halls of Congress directly.”
I think both should put country first and actually stay away for a while. We have people in place to deal with this. We can argue all day whether they are the right people or not, but in times of crisis, often the worst move is the emotional, kneejerk one to bypass the offices and procedures already in place for dealing with such events.
In this case, its a job for Paulson, Bachus, Frank, and to a lesser degree Shelby and Dodd. And between them, they may well now be close to something both parties and both branches of government can live with. Insert a candidate or two, and who knows what happens next.

Posted by: Paul | September 25, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

We also get to see that McShame can not multi-task as well. One thing at a time. It is obvious now that he couldn’t run a business let alone the country.

Posted by: Independent realist | September 25, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

McCain says all hands on deck, and Bush says mission accomplished. But Bush told McStall, to ‘PASS THIS DARN BILL’. Will McCain listen, to Bush, or will the Republicans, tell McCain ‘No’? This situation puts McCain right, in the middle of the Republican and Bush. Which side will he take. Will he have the Democrates bail, him out? Since McCain is worried about, Chewing Gum and Walking, at the same time, will he use another Obama crutch? McCain has tried to adapt to changing staff memebers, due to scandels. Can he keep Palin quiet, a little longer. Palin doesn’t answer Americans questions, and Obama has taken on a stronger stance, for Middle America. Now, will McCain dodge Obama, at the debate?

Posted by: historyforgotten | September 25, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Paul well said-I still believe that they should be there Hey if some one going to cook a big meal Should’nt the chefs be there trying to decide whats going to be on the menu?

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Due to the severity of the financial crisis, articles like this should be suspended until McCain’s arrival in DC.

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

This was a ploy to make McCain look like he cares unlike Bush who he’s running as. It’s a fraud that unfortunately Obama has allowed John to perpetuate. So I ask Barack debate Nader, Baldwin, or Paul, at least there will be a discussion about America’s problems and how we can solve them, no Obama will just do whatever his colleague asks of him. Jeez, what election, this has become a FARCE!!!

Posted by: hmn | September 25, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Throughout this campaign, Senator McCain has conducted himself in a very irresponsible manner, and his erratic actions and statements are increasingly befuddling. This latest move is a clear Hail Mary moment designed to switch the conversation from Obama’s lead in the economy to his ‘selfless’ act to ‘save’ the economy with his ONE vote. A brilliant move, despite risks to global confidence, and amidst slipping public polls. Through the campaign, we have seen the spectacle of ‘Celebrity’ while Obama was in Berlin, and Palin’s family drama as analysis of Obama’s speech at the DNC was ripped off the airwaves. And now an act of feigned selflessness in suspending his campaign which has effectively changed the media conversation to inextricably tie the rescue package to his name, at the grave risk of further delaying the time-critical process through injection of presidential politics.
While strategically powerful, one does question why an upright, together candidate, would resort to such wanton acts of manipulation and diversions. ‘Celebrity’ was highly effective, as Obama’s poise, substance and popularity was used effectively against him. However,it is now becoming apparent that the woman who could be a 72-year old heartbeat away from presidency is woefully under-qualified for the task, and was selected purely for shock value and for stealing the media initiative. In this latest move, McCain’s interference risks delaying the bill, and eroding global confidence further by presenting to the world a divided America.
Repeatedly, Senator John McCain has turned away from his old respectable self, offered positions his campaign has not been able to back up (i.e. claiming to fight a lobbyist infested government when his own campaign is staffed and funded heavily by special interests). In his relentless charges of media ‘bias’ (creating doubts in the foundations of truth in society), followed by relentless volleys of lies, John McCain has shown a willingness to apply mass manipulation to misinform the electorate on key issues affecting their choice like taxation (50% of americans still believe that Obama will raise taxes for everyone), and applying the same old tactics of dividing the electorate with choices (abortion, guns, gay marriage) which are totally irrelevant for the challenges facing America today. With his campaign unable to pull ahead, McCain has also shown a willingness to steal the mantle of change from Obama, attempting to make some of his opponent’s key ideas (gov records on the web, reform) look like his own. Of late, there have been a very subtle injection of race into the conversation, and as evident in the rise of intolerant acts and statements across the blogs and across America, he has wilfully fanned the flames of racism – the rot of our society.
At the heart of his strategy is a general assumption that Americans are naive, unable to do their own research, and unable to be critical of attempts at manipulation. Taking a strongly anti-intellectual tone, one questions how this kind of leadership would encourage our young to strive for a better education. Instead of hope and promise, he has driven his campaign through fear and division.
With the race still close, his campaign strategy is still statistically effective. Looking deeper, one question lingers – is winning more important to John McCain than doing the right thing?

Posted by: Andy | September 25, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

I know this is a long post, but it is very informative so PLEASE READ.
I’m wondering whether Congress will be able to truly fix the current mess and how much the fix will cause problems in the future. Our current financial crisis is due to a number of problems and not just what’s happening to AIG, Lehman Bros., Fannie or Freddie.
Lets place the blame on today’s current crisis where it truly belongs. The national debt, the mortgage crisis, and the debt we are further incurring.
The United States is in debt and this is partially due to the costs of the Iraq War, which is the sole responsibility of the Bush Administration. Voters/individuals will decide if they believe the war was worth it.
Another part of the crisis is due to excessive spending, including pork barrel spending and earmarks. This lies at the feet of both parties in Congress. Earmarks are slipped into bills at the last moment and many including the President (whether its Bush, Clinton, etc) do not become aware of them until after a bill is signed. Both parties are at fault here.
Congress, regulation, and the Clinton administration caused the mortgage crisis, which has forced many like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to fail. Since most people here do not want to believe the last fact, here are facts to back up my last statement. In 1994, President Bill Clinton signed a bill to promote low-income home ownership. To accomplish this it required the implementation of adjustable rate mortgages. Money actually costs banks money (because people save and expect interest on their savings). That’s why banks make loans that charge interest. It’s to gain money in order to pay interest in savings (basic fact).
Now lets put together a scenario that shows the consequences of Clinton’s bill. Lets say money costs banks 6%; therefore they need to charge 6% interest on their loans in order to remain in business. What the adjustable rate mortgage did is allow people to buy homes and only pay say 5% in the first year (banks are losing money). In the second year or third year the rate would go up to 6% (bank breaks even). In the third or fourth year, the owner would pay 7% to replace the loss banks incurred when the homeowner was only paying 5% (bank makes money and may stay in business). By the time the homeowner is paying 7% banks, consumers and everyone else believed that the value of the home would have appreciated. This allowed people to refinance and afford to pay the interest that allowed the banks to recover from their losses and possibly make some money. Not a bad plan overall.
The problem is that people betted on the house appreciating, which once the housing bubble burst, did not happen. In addition the crisis was also caused by changes in accounting principles and the addition of bad regulation (not deregulation, regulation). Under the Clinton administration, Congress, by law, required Savings and Loans companies (like Fannie, Freddie, and other banks) to give mortgages to risky borrowers. In order to do this, banks had to borrow money from other banks and foreign investors. To borrow from other banks and foreign investors, the borrowing banks wrapped up the mortgages into sub-prime loan packages. Banks used the homeowner’s loans as collateral saying that these people had a loan and would pay it off. Here is where regulation again caused a problem. According to Congress, banks could not discriminate between loans. Meaning these loans will most likely pay off, here is one sub-prime loan package and these are the risky sub-prime loans, there is another package. Nope, banks were forced to wrap up the risky loans that fell through together with the loans that were likely to be paid. When loans started falling through, banks and foreign investors no longer “bought” the sub-prime loans packages. Banks were forced to stop lending credit, more loans fell through, and people were forced to foreclose. This is when companies like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac started getting into real trouble. So in truth, it wasn’t the fault of banks it was the fault of Congress’ regulations that were passed during the Clinton administration.
I won’t go into the long-term effects here. However, for those who are curious here is a research paper that describes those effects and showcases these negative effects and how the ones that were really hurt are racial minorities (especially African Americans).

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Boneheaded

Posted by: Mala | September 25, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Is Palin involved in the negotiation of the bailout plan? If McCain can’t debate as scheduled, we should move up the VP debate to this Friday. Give us a preview of what we should expect if Palin has to take over for McCain.
Obama/Biden 08

Posted by: Obama/Biden 08 | September 25, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

McCain is a liar. He is not on any of the committees that would be drafting the bill, he has missed EVERY important vote of the last 18 months (Check the records MCCAIN IS THE MOST ABSENT SENATOR SINCE mid-2006). He is also a 26-year veteran of PUSHING DE_REGULATIONS.
All you suckers who believe this is a “noble” act wake up! Its a cynical hail mary pass to try to save the game as his team goes down. We CAN NOT LIVE WITH 4 more years. Toss the old crone out on his ass!

Posted by: MadAsHell | September 25, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I forgot to post he website for the research paper. Here it is: http://www.faireconomy.org/files/StateOfDream_01_16_08_Web.pdf

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Aside from the politics of this, here’s a question for anyone interested.
The proposal basically is for the government to buy bundles of mortgage backed securities at a price determined by analysts. The analysts are needed to determine a fair market value, because the securities right now aren’t selling – meaning the government could get them for pennies on the dollar, but will use the analysts to pay more for them, to ensure a sufficient flow of capital to the investment banks making the trades.
In other words, the government isn’t working like a normal investor, who tries to buy low and sell high. Its intentionally buying higher than it has to.
So, what’s the exit plan? Has anyone heard about a sell strategy? Do we intentionally sell these investments at a lower price to further ensure profits and cashflow for the private sector?

Posted by: Paul | September 25, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am

So, my dem friends — what if McCain doesn’t go back and try and get his party to come to consensus for the bailout? What if, after the Committee leadership came out with their versions, their whip vote counts tell them a third to a half of Republicans won’t vote for the bill. Will the Dems go ahead (as the majority party) and will they vote to pass it as Bush and his team have requested?

Posted by: The | September 25, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Desperate I think would be the right term explaining the McCain move.

Posted by: Ben - Oregon | September 25, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

MadAsHell: Please read my post. It’s long, but simple and informative. Part of the current problem is regulation, not deregulation.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Can any of my RINO friends explain to me why it is a good idea for McCain to rush to Washington to preside over the surrender of the Reagan Revolution to Pelosi and Barney Frank? Where did you get your principles?

Posted by: Bill D. Fence | September 25, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

reddog: “I still believe that they should be there Hey if some one going to cook a big meal Should’nt the chefs be there trying to decide whats going to be on the menu?”
There’s an argument for that, but the counter-argument is we have two chefs trying to get the same job, and would you really want to eat something cooked by current chefs as well as two prospective ones, each of whom is trying to out-cook the other?
I believe there’s an old saying about too many cooks spoiling the broth.

Posted by: Paul | September 25, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Paul – re: your good questions re: mkt value … don’t worry, “We have people in place to deal with this” and apparently they don’t need anyone coming in and asking pesky questions or making suggestions.

Posted by: ZZ | September 25, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

What’s going to backfire on McCain is that the DJIA is going to close UP today.

Posted by: juancho | September 25, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Would someone please give a constructive comment on my rather long post? I’m curious to see if anyone will either add to it, will be able to contradict it (with facts), or I was wondering if you just don’t really care.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Paul, to paraphrase Treasure of Sierra Madre:
“Exit Plan, we don’t need no stinking exit plan?” See Iraq.

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Concerns About…you think the McCain campaign let’s its Dutch journalist volunteers read other posts?

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

I think the two of them are very close on their ideas and it would be nice for the two of them to come together and show leadership change. I think that could be the single greatest moment in American history politics

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Ed from MA – Is this the same National Enquirer that reporting on a NASA Moon Walker Alien Cover Up? Maybe you and should just stick to getting your news from “Air America” and the DNC. Laughable…

Posted by: Loves this country | September 25, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

ricky: your post doesn’t make sense.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

And by close On ideas I mean on the bailout.

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

ConcernsAboutTheTruth-Now lets put together a scenario that shows the consequences of Clinton’s bill. Lets say money costs banks 6%; therefore they need to charge 6% interest on their loans in order to remain in business. What the adjustable rate mortgage did is allow people to buy homes and only pay say 5% in the first year (banks are losing money). In the second year or third year the rate would go up to 6% (bank breaks even). In the third or fourth year, the owner would pay 7% to replace the loss banks incurred when the homeowner was only paying 5% (bank makes money and may stay in business). By the time the homeowner is paying 7% banks, consumers and everyone else believed that the value of the home would have appreciated. This allowed people to refinance and afford to pay the interest that allowed the banks to recover from their losses and possibly make some money. Not a bad plan overall. IF They sell it what it cost them they would not remain in Buissness!!!!!!!!

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

The: “…what if McCain doesn’t go back and try and get his party to come to consensus for the bailout?”
False dichotomy. McCain can’t rally his party’s congressmen any way than to show up in person?
I suspect all he’d need to do is express support for the bailout, from anywhere, and as the standard bearer for his party, they’d go along.

Posted by: Paul | September 25, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

if this is Obama’s move, I bet you don’t see people questioning or second guessing. All because it is McCain. I for one, think he did this out of good faith.

Posted by: Amy | September 25, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

So, first McCain outflanks him by pulling an unplanned Demonstration of Leadership. Then Obama tries to dig in his heels and somehow make, “Call me if you need me” a palatable political response to the financial crisis bearing down on our economy like Katrina approaching Lake Pontchartrain (feeling inspired yet!?). And THEN, Obama gets schooled by George Freaking W Bush?? George Bush is calling Obama back to Washington? Obama is like every numbskull teenager getting a call on their cell from an exasperated parent: Get your butt home here right now to do your homework! Buster, you need to get your priorities straight!
Boy, oh boy. Obama pwned by Bush? There is only one word for Obama and the nitwits at the DONC:AMATEURS
http://www.pumapac.org

Posted by: HP Boston | September 25, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

McCain….brilliant, Presidential, and knows when the house is on fire you don’t multitask (debate). AS ALWAYS PUTS OUR COUNTRY FIRST, and would rather lose an election and do right by this country.
Obama, as usual, puts his ego first and used his press conference to posture as if everything is about HIM. My God, he is so “actor mentality”….me, me, I, I. What a bloviator!
McCAIN/PALIN ALL THE WAY!

Posted by: Debra | September 25, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Reddog: Actually breaking even does allow businesses to remain in business. It just does not allow them to grow. Volunteer and Not for Profit organizations are business and some people working for those organizations are paid. Many of these businesses break even. Also my post was based on those who were getting adjustable rate mortgages/loans and the buy/sell of subprime packages, not everyone who received a loan.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Anyone tell me what Obama’s plan is? HE HAS NONE…I am so upset that the media doesn’t talk about it…Friday, McCain detailed his plan yet we hear nothing in the Obama camp…I want a leader not a follower!

Posted by: Joe Carson | September 25, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

It saddens me that so many Republicans are willing to see the Reagan planks of the Republican platform thrown overboard by John McCain in an effort to save the Bush legacy. Gingrich was right the first time.

Posted by: Bill D. Fence | September 25, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Suck on this you Obama Nuts.
McCain’s statement from the Congressional Record.
Mr. President, this week Fannie Mae’s regulator reported that the company’s quarterly reports of profit growth over the past few years were “illusions deliberately and systematically created” by the company’s senior management, which resulted in a $10.6 billion accounting scandal.
The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight’s report goes on to say that Fannie Mae employees deliberately and intentionally manipulated financial reports to hit earnings targets in order to trigger bonuses for senior executives. In the case of Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae’s former chief executive officer, OFHEO’s report shows that over half of Mr. Raines’ compensation for the 6 years through 2003 was directly tied to meeting earnings targets. The report of financial misconduct at Fannie Mae echoes the deeply troubling $5 billion profit restatement at Freddie Mac.
The OFHEO report also states that Fannie Mae used its political power to lobby Congress in an effort to interfere with the regulator’s examination of the company’s accounting problems. This report comes some weeks after Freddie Mac paid a record $3.8 million fine in a settlement with the Federal Election Commission and restated lobbying disclosure reports from 2004 to 2005. These are entities that have demonstrated over and over again that they are deeply in need of reform.
For years I have been concerned about the regulatory structure that governs Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–known as Government-sponsored entities or GSEs–and the sheer magnitude of these companies and the role they play in the housing market. OFHEO’s report this week does nothing to ease these concerns. In fact, the report does quite the contrary. OFHEO’s report solidifies my view that the GSEs need to be reformed without delay.
I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.
I urge my colleagues to support swift action on this GSE reform legislation.
I’d say this pretty clearly refutes Barack Obama’s silly claims that John McCain is not a reformer and does not know anything about economics. One candidate is the real reformer, and it ain’t Barack Obama. By the way, the Democrats blocked the legislation McCain proposed, and it was never passed. So if you want to know why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed, leaving the taxpayers with billions of dollars in losses, blame the Congressional Democrats.
Try and Spin this Please!!

Posted by: Kim | September 25, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

ConcernsAboutTheTruth-First off most not for profit organizations are scams setup to break even No one is going to stay in buissness to break even. It is about growth.Just because they break even on paper does not mean they did not make money

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Posted by: Kim | Sep 25, 2008 12:18:53 PM-Try and Spin this Please!! They cant kim thats why they try to say he is ducking the debate

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Pardon me, Concerns About. I thought you heard the news about the Dutch jounalist who volunteered for the McCain campaign and was assigned to write fake letters to the editor. I just meant you obviously have ideas, not simply an axe to grind. Most of the posts here are talking points from campaigns.

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Thanks for clarifying Ricky. No I had not heard about the Dutch journalist.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Both Senator McCain and Obama need to focus on leading with their own solutions to our future. Our economy won’t recover by money being thrown at the problem — much like another credit card to get us out of debt.
Wall street has defaulted, and public stewardship would just maintain the status quo.
The next president should use the proposed money for job creation at home — not abroad. The candidate that rejects wall street and embraces american job growth gets my vote.

Posted by: Nun A Tak | September 25, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Kim must have missed Palin’s interview with Couric on CBS last night. Beyond that one insert form the Congressional Record there is no record of McCain doing anything to avert this crisis.
To quote Sarah the Great, “I’ll try and find ome and get back to ya.”

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Reddog: I volunteer for a Not for Profit Organization. We make money to cover our costs and the rest is donated to cancer research. Yes businesses have to make money, but not everyone is about growth.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

There’s no smart or dumb move on this. He’s just want to take care of this economic issue for the people. I bet he could care less about the election. After what he has been through and shown in his life, McCain is no wimp like obama to dodge a debate.

Posted by: hannah | September 25, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

To heck with it- enough with the POW crap.
McCain was a bad pilot. He got shot down. He got captured. He confessed under torture. He used his family clout (the Admirals) to get special treatment. That makes him qualified for what now? A medal, maybe, but not the Presidency.
John Kerry was twice the soldier he was, and you all still voted for Geroge, the AWOL alcoholic nitwit.
Country first, my a$$.

Posted by: Mike | September 25, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

BRILLIANT
NOW HE CAN HIDE BEHIND OUR PROBLEMS
It was either this, or fire your campaign manager for his ties to Freddie Mac
Almost as BRILLIANT as BUSH last night BLAMING our problems becaues
WE WERE SO WELL OFF 10 YEARS AGO, that we got SO USED TO LIVING IN A SURPLUS
DAMN PRESIDENT CLINTON! you are to blame! why you had to go and put us in surplus!!!!!

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm

Ricky- what did Obama do? Are you of the mind of do nothing at all?

Posted by: Kim | September 25, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

This financial crisis was so severe Bush administration officials briefed Congress last Friday and they worked on a plan through the weekend. According to this blog, it was not until Tuesday that Bush himself canceled a fundraiser to get back to Washington to work on the crisis. Then McCain does the same thing the next day. Original leadership my posterior.

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

ConcernsAboutTheTruth – Thats great you work for a not for profit and its great they donate money and I am sure the nice people who run the place get paid well and also skim money in ways they you may not even realize and not all places are like that but many of the ones I have seen are

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

HANNAH
Why didn’t he and the rest of the Republicans work on it BEFORE?!
WHAT now we have to stop our campaign of HOPE and CHANGE BECAUSE YOUR REPUBLICANS MESSED THINGS UP?
I want a president that won’t send out the message “IF YOU ARE PLANNING ON ATTACKING THE US, DO IT WHILE WE ARE IN CRISIS, BECAUSE WE’LL BE TOO BUSY TO NOTICE”

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

Kim, just last week Obama reassured the country that the fundamentals of the economy were sound. What more could he…oops. Wrong guy.

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Gigi: Members of both parties wrote/sponsored bills years ago to warn and possibly take care of the crisis. These bills failed because of gridlock in the Congress. Just because there may be a majority does not mean that party has supreme control. That is why we have what the people of the United States calls a do nothing Congress with the lowest ratings in history.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

It is unbelievable that McCain is stopping everything to go to Washington to “Save the Day”. . Kind of reminds me of a John Wayne Movie where the hero rides in at last minute to save the farm and get the girl (Palin?). Watch your back First Dude! John McCain is playing politics with a financial disaster that has his fingerprints all over it. Its obvious his presence is not needed or even wanted, yet here he comes riding his white horse, sitting high in the saddle.
A columnist in Arizona once wrote that John McCain is the kind of guy who sees a parade, jumps in front of it, and proudly declares he is the leader.
Well…….There he goes again!

Posted by: keith | September 25, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Boneheaded! If he doesn’t show up for the debate Friday night, he will look like a coward and conservative Repulicans and Democrats and Independents will substantiate that his presence in D.C. should not have prevented him debating Obama. If he tries to create and excuse for Sarah Palin not to debate Joe Biden, every member of the press, Republican and Democrat, will crucify him for choosing her as his runningmate and for being afraid to trust her in a debate let alone trust her to br one 72-year-old heartbeat away from the presidency.

Posted by: osage | September 25, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Sarah Palin could not think of anything McCain did to regulate the economic crisis when asked by Katie Couric on CBS last night. Because her pit bull ate the briefing book while she was at the hockey match with first dude! Cancel the debates. We have a Great Depression to stave off of our fundamentally sound economy that we can see from Alaska.

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

LASTLY
IF MCCAIN WAS PRESIDENT
and he wasn’t available because he is taking care of something more important (LIKE YOU REPUBLICANS SAY)
SHOULDN’T THE VICE PRESIDENT TAKE OVER THE PRESIDENT?
How about it Sarah? – or you’re gonna fix the economy too? you can’t honey. YOU want this position right? YOU can’t be in the same place of the president like you’ve done now 7 out of 10 times (Fact)
WHY WON’T SARAH PALIN TAKE OVER THE DEBATE?
watch, watch… every other republican here will ignore this question. – party first, country last – according to them.

Posted by: GIGI - REPUBLICANS PUT PARTY FIRST | September 25, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Ricky: The fundamentals of the economy according to McCain are the American workers. The American workers are responsible for creating new technology from computers to alternative energy. They are responsible for growing the food you eat. They are responsible for fixing your car. If the American workers are not strong there is no hope for this country. The American workers are responsible for getting this country out of every crisis we have ever been in. By mocking this statement by McCain you are mocking the average worker. Say anything negative about McCain that you want. But please make it factual and where it does not shed a negative light on the working people of America. In fact, do you ever have anything positive to say? Everything I’ve read is negative and not constructive at all.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Next the Republican posters here will tell us that the pit bull that ate Sarah Palin’s homework before her CBS interview was really sent by the same Kenyan witch that has Obama’s passport.
Escept we know Palin’s minister laid hands on her and protected her from witchcraft back in 2005!

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Gigi: Members of both parties wrote/sponsored bills years ago to warn and possibly take care of the crisis. These bills failed because of gridlock in the Congress. Just because there may be a majority does not mean that party has supreme control. That is why we have what the people of the United States calls a do nothing Congress with the lowest ratings in history.
Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | Sep 25, 2008 12:37:59 PM
————————————–
THAT’S NOT WHAT YOUR PRESIDENT SAID LAST NIGHT. And sorry, I didn’t know that when you have a Republican PResident and a Republican filled congress, the blame for all that goes wrong falls on Barack Obama (because he won’t fix it)

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Bonehead is Bush sending FEMA to Wall Street. ……………
http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/09/25/bush-sends-fema-to-wall-street/

Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | September 25, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Reddog: I volunteer for a Not for Profit Organization. We make money to cover our costs and the rest is donated to cancer research. Yes businesses have to make money, but not everyone is about growth.
Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | Sep 25, 2008 12:27:02 PM
—————————
I commend you, I plan, coordinate and execute fundraisers for TJ Martell, Skylar Neil Foundation, Lillyclaire foundation and The United Way of So FL, what organization do you support?

Posted by: Gigi | September 25, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Who cares if Obama didn’t want to go to Washington? He would only vote “present” anyway. The Democrats are mad because they don’t have a leader who knows how to prioritize.

Posted by: Lori | September 25, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

“In light of the collapse of Fannie and Freddie, both John McCain and Barack Obama now criticize the risk-tolerant regulatory regime that produced the current crisis. But Sen. McCain’s criticisms are at least credible, since he has been pointing to systemic risks in the mortgage market and trying to do something about them for years.
In contrast, Sen. Obama’s conversion as a financial reformer marks a reversal from his actions in previous years, when he did nothing to disturb the status quo….All the Republicans on the Committee supported the bill, and all the Democrats voted against it. Mr. McCain endorsed the legislation in a speech on the Senate floor. Mr. Obama, like all other Democrats, remained silent….If the Democrats had let the 2005 legislation come to a vote, the huge growth in the subprime and Alt-A loan portfolios of Fannie and Freddie could not have occurred, and the scale of the financial meltdown would have been substantially less. The same politicians who today decry the lack of intervention to stop excess risk taking in 2005-2006 were the ones who blocked the only legislative effort that could have stopped it.

Posted by: HP Boston | September 25, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Gigi: Did I mention Barack Obama at all? I don’t think so, I believe that was you. Also if you read my rather long post I blame both republicans and democrats for the current financial crisis.
As to the rest of your statement, it’s fact that republicans argue with republicans, democrats argue with democrats, some republicans side with democrats on some issues, some democrats side with some republicans on certain issues. So again, just because you may have a majority does not mean that you reign supreme. Also the democrats have been in control of Congress for the past two years, republicans for the past 6. Doesn’t matter, we are still in a crisis and the American people outside those in Washington were not properly informed.
McCain/Clinton/Obama all wrote/sponsored bills to warn/fix the crisis. But none of it was passed. So therefore they, just like congress, proved ineffectual.
This is a bi-partisan problem.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Three of the four frontrunners in this election have the position of SENATOR… elected BY the people and paid to do their jobs.
This action taken by Congress on this particular crisis is going to affect our country for a VERY long time.
Why wouldn’t the “next president”, whichever man is elected, NOT want to be front and center as Congress works out these details? He is going to have to live with the fall-out and the affer-effects throughout his presidency.
I believe it’s a time where SENATORS need to be doing their job. It’s not a time to be absent!
All three Senators should understand what a PRIVILEGE and TRUST has been granted to them by the people who elected them.
Shame on those who deride McCain for getting back to Washington to do his job.
Is it political? EVERYTHING is political in a campaign! Too bad it’s that way. However, I feel that because of McCain’s experience, he DOES understand that his place is in Washington, campaign or not.
The financial stakes are higher than ever.
Let the SENATORS do their jobs! And quit GRIPING when they do!!!

Posted by: Sue C | September 25, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Oh, my, Concerns About! There you were waxing eloquent about non-profits. Then you spend a whole post regurgitating word for word the ex-post-facto explanation McCain gave for saying “the fundamentals of our economy are strong”
while Lehman and Merril were going belly up. Instead of owning up to his own stupididty, he, and now you, say pointing out that studpidity is an attack on American workers. You mean the ones he said would not pick lettuce at any wage when he was pushing his immigration bill? Those workers? The workers he voted against 19 times on minimum wage increases? Those workers? Or maybe the Dutch volunteers who invented the blackberry so McCain could claim credit and then give a tax break to allow their American bosses to outsource the tech support to India.

Posted by: ricky | September 25, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Brilliant move by President McCain!

Posted by: tina | September 25, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

So, first McCain outflanks him by pulling an unplanned Demonstration of Leadership. Then Obama tries to dig in his heels and somehow make, “Call me if you need me” a palatable political response to the financial crisis bearing down on our economy like Katrina approaching Lake Pontchartrain (feeling inspired yet!?). And THEN, Obama gets schooled by George Freaking W Bush?? George Bush is calling Obama back to Washington? Obama is like every numbskull teenager getting a call on their cell from an exasperated parent: Get your butt home here right now to do your homework! Buster, you need to get your priorities straight!
Boy, oh boy. Obama pwned by Bush? There is only one word for Obama and the nitwits at the DONC:AMATEURS
http://www.pumapac.org

Posted by: HP Boston | September 25, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Gigi to answer your question I volunteer for the American Cancer Society. I joined this after my sister a 23 got cancer. I also volunteer for CASA which works to support abused and neglected children.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

“In light of the collapse of Fannie and Freddie, both John McCain and Barack Obama now criticize the risk-tolerant regulatory regime that produced the current crisis. But Sen. McCain’s criticisms are at least credible, since he has been pointing to systemic risks in the mortgage market and trying to do something about them for years.
In contrast, Sen. Obama’s conversion as a financial reformer marks a reversal from his actions in previous years, when he did nothing to disturb the status quo….All the Republicans on the Committee supported the bill, and all the Democrats voted against it. Mr. McCain endorsed the legislation in a speech on the Senate floor. Mr. Obama, like all other Democrats, remained silent….If the Democrats had let the 2005 legislation come to a vote, the huge growth in the subprime and Alt-A loan portfolios of Fannie and Freddie could not have occurred, and the scale of the financial meltdown would have been substantially less. The same politicians who today decry the lack of intervention to stop excess risk taking in 2005-2006 were the ones who blocked the only legislative effort that could have stopped it.

Posted by: HP Boston | September 25, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

It’s a good thing to see that people from all walks of life take their time and money and put it into worthy causes. It helps to know one is not alone.
God bless you and your family.

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

It’s admirable of John McCain to postpone the debate and put the “Country First”, something, Obama has yet to realize that America comes first. McCain will destroy Obama in a foreign affairs debate and this is a good call. America, will not see this as McCain gambling, but as McCain, the TRUE presidential candidate wanting to help out main street America, not Wall Street. Obama has lost on this one and the polls will reflect this. Honestly, I don’t see why Obama is continuing to campaign with his “empty rhetoric and now substance”. He’s an idiot!
McCain/Palin 08!
‘COUNTRY FIRST!’

Posted by: Will | September 25, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

Gallup today shows that McCain and Obama are tied at 46%. It appears that McCain’s suggestion to postpone the debate and concentrate on America is working. Americans know that McCain is the man for the job and will be the next POTUS. Obama, well, he’s just that, Obama, the fake community organizer!
McCain/Palin 08!
“Country First!”

Posted by: david from texas | September 25, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Gallup today shows that McCain and Obama are tied at 46%. It appears that McCain’s suggestion to postpone the debate and concentrate on America is working. Americans know that McCain is the man for the job and will be the next POTUS. Obama, well, he’s just that, Obama, the fake community organizer!
McCain/Palin 08!
“Country First!”
Posted by: david from texas | Sep 25, 2008 1:09:28 PM
———————
SHOULDN’T MCCAIN’S VICE PRESIDENT TAKE OVER THE EVENT?

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Gallup Daily: Race Back to a Tie at 46% Each NEW September 25, 2008
John McCain has gained ground and is now tied with Barack Obama among registered voters in the latest Gallup Poll Daily tracking update for Sept. 22-24, with each candidate getting 46% support.

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Why when a valid poit is made do you liberals always try to divert away from it with rhetoric instaed of say good I dont agree with what McCain is saying but I like the idea it okay to do that you know

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

McCain/Clinton/Obama all wrote/sponsored bills to warn/fix the crisis. But none of it was passed.
So therefore they,
just like congress,
proved ineffectual.
This is a bi-partisan problem.
Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | Sep 25, 2008 12:55:31 PM
———————–
SO what good does it make for McCain to stop his campaign?
other than campaign stragety, that is.

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

That why S%^t doesnt get done in goverment

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Obama in a debate…”ummm…uhhh…ohhh…hmmm…uhh….yeah, I agree with Mrs. Clinton”. Palin would wipe the floor with NoBammy!

Posted by: jess | September 25, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Obammy without a teleprompter:
Moderator: Mr. Obama, what is your plan for the economy of the U.S.?
Obammy: Hmm..uhhh….I dont know, that is above my paygrade!
Obama=a joke!

Posted by: jess | September 25, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

GIGI
SO what good does it make for McCain to stop his campaign?
He wanted both to stop Barack its all about me in the spotlight did not want to-Its about focusing on the problem in a bi-partisan way

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

SO what good does it make for McCain to stop his campaign?
other than campaign stragety, that is.
Posted by: GIGI | Sep 25, 2008 1:13:30 PM
In the eyes of Americans, the candidate willing to give up his campaign for the future of America reasonates deeply. John McCain represents America….Obama represents himself.

Posted by: david from texas | September 25, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

He wanted both to stop Barack its all about me in the spotlight did not want to-Its about focusing on the problem in a bi-partisan way
Posted by: reddog0216 | Sep 25, 2008 1:17:39 PM
Very good comment!

Posted by: david from texas | September 25, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

McCain should send Palin to debate Obama.
That would be great. In foriegn policy!

Posted by: geevill | September 25, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Again McCain willing to reach across the aslie to the other side to work together
Thanx david

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

I think the candidate willing to give up the most for the security of the country is the candidate that will win the election. Thats why, John McCain will win in November…he truly puts America first. I agree with david from texas, Obama is in this for himself, not for America.

Posted by: Janey | September 25, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

SO what good does it make for McCain to stop his campaign?
other than campaign stragety, that is.
Posted by: GIGI | Sep 25, 2008 1:13:30 PM
In the eyes of Americans, the candidate willing to give up his campaign for the future of America reasonates deeply. John McCain represents America….Obama represents himself.
Posted by: david from texas | Sep 25, 2008 1:17:59 PM
———————-
so you are saying he is doing it so American CAN SEE who the best candidate is… ISN’T THAT CAMPAIGNING?
HOW IS THAT NOT CAMPAIGNING?

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

@ Janey:
Just as reddog0216 has stated, its all about bi-partisanship. Obama is so deeply entrenched with the theology of Dodd, Pelosi, Dean, Reid that he can’t be bipartisan….they control him. He is their “puppet” and America knows this. Obama will say and do anything to get him elected….which, btw, is failing. With Bush’s record, Obama should be blowing McCain out in the polls, but isn’t. The reason, America sees thru Obama’s empty rhetoric, no substance. He’s not the man for the job and America will not let him have this position. McCain, will reach across the aisle, as he has done so in the past for the future of America. What has Obama done, voted “present”.
McCain/Palin 08!
“COUNTRY FIRST!”

Posted by: david from texas | September 25, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Obama in a debate…”ummm…uhhh…ohhh…hmmm…uhh….yeah, I agree with Mrs. Clinton”. Palin would wipe the floor with NoBammy!
Posted by: jess | Sep 25, 2008 1:14:27 PM
————————–
FUN QUESTION OF THE DAY!!!!!!
answer this correctly and you will receive today’s award for BRIGHTEST PERSON THAT READS ABC:
WHO ARE THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN THE FOLLOWING ARGUMENT ABOUT DRILLING IN OUR COUNTRY FOR ENERGY SOURCES?
1- Who said: “OUR OPPONENTS SAY, AGAIN AND AGAIN, THAT DRILLING WILL NOT SOLVE ALL OF AMERICA’S ENGERGY PROBLEMS – AS IF WE DIDN’T KNOW THAT ALREADY”
2- And who said: “I BEG TO DISAGREE WITH ANY CANDIDATE WHO WOULD SAY WE CAN’T DRILL OUR WAY OUT OF OUR PROBLEMS”
Choose your Answer:
A – Sarah Palin Against Sarah Palin
B – Former Mayor of Wasila Against Alaska’s Governor
C – Brystol Palins Mom Against Willow Palin’s Mom
D – All of the Above

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Gigi…you are getting confused….McCain is doing this for the good of the country regardless of the campaign…thats why he is doing it. Obama, on the other hand, is pandering……he hasn’t mentioned how bipartisandhip will help the country….i doubt he even knows what bipartisanship is. McCain is doing this for the country…..its heartfelt, real, and needed at this time in America. Obama’s stance on this will undboubtedly hurt him…..which I’m glad…Obama will NEVER be POTUS.

Posted by: david from texas | September 25, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

No David “its because replublicans are stupid and The racist americans that are causing Obama not to be blowing McCain out of the water”
The above statement was played by reddog portraying a liberal

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

JUST RELEASED
PRINCETON, NJ — John McCain has gained ground and is now tied with Barack Obama among registered voters in the latest Gallup Poll Daily tracking update for Sept. 22-24, with each candidate getting 46% support.
http://www.gallup.com

Posted by: ch | September 25, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

JUST RELEASED
PRINCETON, NJ — John McCain has gained ground and is now tied with Barack Obama among registered voters in the latest Gallup Poll Daily tracking update for Sept. 22-24, with each candidate getting 46% support.
http://www.gallup.com

Posted by: ch | September 25, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

one question for all you saying they should keep campaigning.did anu one of them give up there seat in congress?we all know the answer is no.so it is both of their duties as congressmen to be there as all others are to tackle this crisis.

Posted by: p | September 25, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Did you see Bill Clinton slap Obama down again? He said McCain’s emphasis is right on the money. They most be steamed at Camp O.

Posted by: Jacknyc | September 25, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

GIGI
SO what good does it make for McCain to stop his campaign?
He wanted both to stop Barack its all about me in the spotlight did not want to-Its about focusing on the problem in a bi-partisan way
Posted by: reddog0216 | Sep 25, 2008 1:17:39 PM
————————
RedDog ive seen you post with a lot of integrity. you cut my post short and maybe you didn’t do it intentionally but someone said that OBAMA, MCCAIN AND CLINTON along with Congress has been ineffecctive in fixing the economy in spite of their legislation creating efforths
so if they have been innefective, what good does it do to back to that?
>>>>>You can’t just recreate my question at your convenience, this is not Alaska<<<<<<<<<<<
I Know what good it makes!!!!
it takes attention away from:
ALASKA RANKS FIRST IN THE NATION FOR PORK, RAKING IN SEVEN TIMES THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.
JACK ABRAMOFF SECURED $27 MILLION DOLARS FOR PORK SPENDING IN A TOWN OF 9,700 PEOPLE – WASILLA, ALASKA
that's $4,000 per resident!!!!!!
anyone???? did your state get $4,000 per resident???

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Gigi…you are getting confused….McCain is doing this for the good of the country regardless of the campaign…thats why he is doing it. Obama, on the other hand, is pandering……he hasn’t mentioned how bipartisandhip will help the country….i doubt he even knows what bipartisanship is. McCain is doing this for the country…..its heartfelt, real, and needed at this time in America. Obama’s stance on this will undboubtedly hurt him…..which I’m glad…Obama will NEVER be POTUS.
Posted by: david from texas | Sep 25, 2008 1:27:45 PM
————————
that’ is “heart-felt, or real” is up for debate. I am still sore at the image of
him celebrating with BUSH THE DAY KATRINA HIT NEW ORLEANS…
I was in front of the TV crying (I went through ANDREW, it was horrible!) then I flip the channel and see these two BAFOONS LAUGHING IT UP AND POSSING WITH A WHITE CAKE AND THE SYMBOL OF MY COUNTRY IN IT.
Having said that,
if REDDOG says they (CONGRESS) have proven ineffective – WHAT GOOD DOES IT DO TO SUSPEND HIS CAMPAIGN AND GO TO WASHINGTON AGAIN?
other than for America to see him do it and get votes?????????
don’t play with words, you’re smart and we all know it.

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

DAVID
Just as reddog0216 has stated, its all about bi-partisanship. Obama is so deeply entrenched with the theology of Dodd, Pelosi, Dean, Reid that he can’t be bipartisan
——————————
Let’s just hope McCain is not so deeply entrenched with the theology of George W Bush, Rumsfeld, Tom Delay, Jack Abramoff, Mark Foley, Lary Craig, Scooter Libby, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc …
how easy we forget…

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Gigi: In response to your question. Obama/McCain/Clinton should all be going back to Washington to work on the issue. I said that they each wrote/sponsored a bill. That means that each of them has done research in the past and are aware of at least a portion of the problem and have something to contribute to the fixing of the problem. As individuals they each failed, but now since Congress must do something it is more likely that action will be taken. Obama/McCain are also the presidential hopefuls and will be better able to rally their parties together in person than from a distance. Party members tend to listen to their presidential hopefuls even if its just to help their own party out. I think that each candidate has something to contribute and by showing up greater cooperation will occur. Also every vote counts.

Posted by: ConcernsAboutTheTruth | September 25, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

GIGI-I never said congress was ineffective I have said it gridlocks on party lines.And I think that McCain again is trying to cross that party line for the greater good. I think back at why McCain has not been nominated before by his own party for President and Its is in my opinion that he is always willing to cross party lines for the greater good

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

And if I cut you question or statement short I assure you it was accidental And as far as me recieving 4000 back No I have the pleasure of living in new York where they take take take

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

GIGI-Let’s just hope McCain is not so deeply entrenched with the theology of George W Bush, Rumsfeld, Tom Delay, Jack Abramoff, Mark Foley, Lary Craig, Scooter Libby, etc etc etc etc etc etc etc …
Excatly the two of them should be Leaders roll up there sleeves together and fix the problems and I believe thats what McCain was trying to do by suspending the campaign

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

and I believe this was his best campaign tactic yet.
just like he did when he was all “CONCERNED” over IKE hitting TX
Because IKE, not KATRINA, came during Elections time…
how fast we forget.

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

GIGI- I think everyone learned from Katrina Thats all I think you look way to deep into it Yes they made Mistakes during Katrina from local to federal many dropped the ball

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Obama/McCain are also the presidential hopefuls and will be better able to rally their parties together in person than from a distance
——————————–
I am glad to see a Non-Democrat finally giving Obama some credit for being a Leader… just personally I am not sure that publicly telling the world that WE CAN’T HANDLE MORE THAN ONE PROBLEM AT A TIME is a good tactic.
I personally think if McCain REALLY meant it, he would have made a private call adn discussed it AND MAKE THE ANNOUNCEMENT TOGETHER, that would have shown TRUE bipartisanship and GOOD FAITH. Mccain is out to get votes and you and I both know that…

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

They both are Thats the facts 100%.I also know you nor I was there to see or hear why they did not realease a joint statement and Iknow you will say McCain wanted to upstage Obama and I will say no Obama wanted the spotlight for himself

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

“learned from Katrina?”
what like us Floridians are Chopped liver?!
the government had had PLENTY of time to learn about HURRICANES! local, schmocal, we’re about to choose a president, when it comes to local elections I am pretty sure LA’s residents will
have a chance to think about LOCAl.
What is this “learn as you go by screwing up” the Sarah Palin Doctrine?
no standards.

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I’m not a McCain or Obama supporter but I have to say, this move by McCain, imo, is much closer to brilliant than boneheaded… And I think the vast majority will view it that way. It appears Presidential and makes McCain look like a leader and Obama look like a deer in the headlights.
I still want McCain to lose (and unfortunately that means Obama would have to win). Both of them are a diaster waiting to happen.
3rd party 2008!

Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | September 25, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I also will say McCain Has reached across the aslie more not voting his party line more often than Barack

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Once again we can somewhat agree…
Obama wants the spotlight – duh he’s campaigning.
McCain does not want the spotlight – he needs to hide in the shade that his campaign had ties to Freddie Mac
and he sure as heck does not want the attention to be place on Palin…
how do you accomplish this, ruining the campaign? – by doing what he did.
how can you not see this was his best campaign move ever?

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Hold on GIGI when florida got hit by andrew it was nothing like the problems from katrina and I do not mran that in the fact of devistation I mean In the way people were trapped levies etc etc Do you honestly belive that either party wants to harm or put in harms way people of this country? I live in new york and before katrina hit we were all a buzz about the storm comming People stayed by there choice.

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

GIGI-how can you not see this was his best campaign move ever?
Now you are saying he is brillant?

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

Actually if you look at my first comment (too far up) my initial and still my stance is that it was Brilliant; a brilliant move to make votes.
He’s using the Nation’s crisis for his personal gain.
This is the BEST way to get all the spot light to himself.
But it does make him a liar. this is not about us, it’s about him
THIS IS NOT SUSPENDING HIS CAMPAGIN, IT’S HIS BEST CAMPAIGN DECISTION YET.
Campaign = America?

Posted by: Gigi | September 25, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

people did stay there… I don’t know if by choice, I was not in their situation to make that judgement. If they were given help to get out just like they were given help after the disaster… I have my doubts.
I am sad to hear people be so nonchalant about other’s pain. Specially people from NY. oh well.
YES I strongly believe that teh Republican Party is out to hurt us even more.
PROBLEMS don’t take numbers and wait their turn, Senator McCain.

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

The idea that John McCain needs to mount his horse and ride to the rescue in Washington is preposterous. Especially since he just got there about an hour or so ago.
If he was so urgently needed in Washington one would imagine he wouldn’t have spent time interviewing with Katie Couric or appearing on Rachel Rae.
This was a total cowardly move by McCain. Nothing more than political BS. It’s a shame his supporters can’t see that

Posted by: Marlene | September 25, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

You can run (McCain),
but you cannot hide (Palin)
McCain / Palin
Unstable / Unable *
*sources: George Will / Laura Bush

Posted by: darby | September 25, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

It appears to me the one wanting the spotlight for personal gain is Obama, saying he’ll keep his TV appearance by himself rather than work on his Senate duties.

Posted by: zeke | September 25, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

GIGI They are both liars thats what politcians do LIE LIE LIE Show me a politcian and I will show you a liar.

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

anyway… since the campaign is suspended, and the Vice President Nominee can’t take McCain’s place and keep it going…
are they gonna issue refunds to campaign donors?

Posted by: GIGI | September 25, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Thats unfair to say that we are nochalant about people suffering I feel terrible for the people that were trapped there and could not get out.What I said was they made a choice to stay either not beleiving it was going to be bad .I also said that people in ny were all a buzz about the storm and discussing that they should get out of there as soon as possible

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

some how I deleted my other point or that they decided to ride it out It was a sad situation and I think all have learned from it
I think that neither party wants to hurt us it makes no sense for them to put us in harms way.I think most of it comes down to figuring out whats best for the masses and slicing up the pie.
Balancing goverment regulations and the peoples freedoms and liberties

Posted by: reddog0216 | September 25, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

If you have any question as to whether Mr. McCain had political interest in allegedly “suspending” his Presidential campaign, remember that he is a Senator. He doesn’t have to ask permission or make an announcement that he is going to go do his job. He could have very easily and quietly cancelled his scheduled campaign stops for today, walked into his Senate office and gone to work. No need for a major press conference. Just simply lead by example: roll up his shirt sleeves and get down to work. Americans are not immune to such showmanship nor are we confused that every move from a politician is for political purpose. With that, the McCain campaign is not suspended at all but instead, accelerating.

Posted by: JCSherman | September 25, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Now is not the time to waver, stumble or put self before Country. The taxpayer must be protected; the banks and shareholders must be held accountable. There will be pain; there will be hard decisions that cross party lines so therefore my vote is for John McCain.

Posted by: Kyle Forsyth | September 25, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm

Is it typical for a college or university to release transcripts?
The Illinois State Senate record is available online.
His birth certificate has been seen; I don’t recall by whom, but it was reported that it was original and authentic.
Who cares if or when he was baptized or not?
Will his Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard records suddenly reveal that he’s stupid or something? He attended highly touted schools and did well there. Well enough to be Prez of Harvard Review. Well enough to be offered hundreds of lucrative jobs coming out of Harvard. Well enough to become a state senator. And well enough to be nominated by a bunch of pretty smart Democrats badly in need of the power to make significant change in this country. Frankly, I don’t give a rip if he got a “C” in Statistics or a “B” in Chemistry.
If his medical records are sooo important, McCain shouldn’t be allowed to run. The chance that some condition he may have would put him out of commission before the end of his term is small, particularly in comparison with McCain’s chance.
Anywho…

Posted by: steve | September 25, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

KYLE: Are you serious or were you joking?

Posted by: steve | September 25, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm

No Bailout!!!
No Way!!!
Do Not Rob The American People To Help The Wall Street Thugs Who Created This Mess With Their Greed With The Help Of The Banks & Brokers Who Made Millions Of Dollars At Our Expense!!!

Posted by: JBatt | September 25, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.