The Note: Palin Helps McCain ‘Change’ Message
ABC News’ Rick Klein and Z. Byron Wolf report in Monday’s Note:
LENOX, Mass. — Start the countdown: We’re 50 days out now from Election Day 2008. ABC News kicks off its “50 States in 50 Days” tour Monday morning on the “Good Morning America” “Whistle-Stop Express” in the state where — in a sense — the last election ended: Massachusetts, where Sen. John Kerry conceded defeat.
But this is the flip side of blue-state America. Here, on the opposite side of the Bay State from Boston — literally Norman Rockwell country, where the landscape is more Anchorage than Cambridge, far from Wall Street turmoil, yet feeling its pains — the sense is more Palin Nation than Obama Land.
Keep tabs as we tour the whole country.
Democrats can (and will) ignore the woman in the corner who’s making so much fuss. But from the Steaming Tender restaurant in Palmer, to historic Union Station in Worcester, to the Red Lion Inn in Stockbridge, Palin power is in the air — her freshness just maybe helping Sen. John McCain grab the change mantle that’s so key to the race.
“I didn’t think anybody would have the chutzpah to pick someone like her,” said Daniel Schur, of Westborough, Mass., who came out to greet the train’s send-off in Worcester holding a McCain-Palin sign. “That’s one thing people from the East Coast and the West Coast forget — how many people live in the middle of the country.”
Read the rest of The Note — and get all the latest on the 2008 election, Congress, the White House and the wide world of politics every day — from Rick Klein by bookmarking this link.
Maybe it speaks to organization, maybe it’s the result of planning, maybe it means nothing at all — but in the signage, in the buzz, in the chatter, the enthusiasm on the GOP side continues unabated a full two weeks into Gov. Sarah Palin’s not-entirely-smooth introduction to the national scene.
(To say nothing of Tina Fey, just maybe a better Sarah Palin than Sarah Palin, and surely a better Sarah Palin than Sarah Palin was a Tina Fey).
(Meanwhile, Palin’s opposite number — remember Joe? — takes on the task of engaging his friend John on Monday. And Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton hops aboard the “GMA” train Monday afternoon in Albany, N.Y., for her first sit-down interview since conceding the Democratic contest — and since Palin’s emergence — with ABC’s Diane Sawyer.)
It all must be hard for a phenom to watch. But Sen. Barack Obama has first-hand knowledge of the subject.
“One of the things about running over 19 months is that you realize this thing just goes in cycles. Yeah, there are times where you’re a genius; there are times where you’re an idiot,” Obama, D-Ill., tells ABC’s Chris Cuomo.
Continue reading today’s Note by clicking HERE.
ABC News’ Hope Ditto contributed to this report.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Let’s get this out in the national news:
http://www.huliq.com/1/68376/alaska-women-reject-palin-rally
1,500 Women against Palin in Anchorage rally. More women showed up for an anti-Palin rally in Alaska than the number of people who showed up for her own rally. She does not have the great support in Alaska that we have been told. Watch the video. See why
Posted by: katharine | September 15, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Let’s get this out in the national news:
http://www.huliq.com/1/68376/alaska-women-reject-palin-rally
1,500 Women against Palin in Anchorage rally. More women showed up for an anti-Palin rally in Alaska than the number of people who showed up for her own rally. She does not have the great support in Alaska that we have been told. Watch the video. See why.
Posted by: katharine | September 15, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
no one would be stupid enough to pick someone like her.
She’s the queen of earmarks… a bridge to no where lier.
What’s she going to change?
Not a thing.
Posted by: Gus | September 15, 2008, 9:05 am 9:05 am
To a large extent America’s future propesperity and security will depend on international, global developments.
Sarah Alaska Palin hardly knows the meaning of internationalism; she never visited other countries other than two where she only met with… Americans.
The difference between Obama and McCain might come down to something beyond ideology—temperament.
McCain is a pessimist about the world, seeing it as a dark, dangerous place where, without the constant and vigorous application of American force, evil will triumph.
Obama sees a world that is in many ways going our way. As nations develop, they become more modern and enmeshed in the international economic and political system.
To Obama, countries like Iran and North Korea are holdouts against the tide of history. America’s job is to push these progressive forces forward, using soft power more than hard, and to try to get the world’s major powers to solve the world’s major problems.
Obama’s internationalism will strengthen America in the 21st century, where McCain’s xenophobia will marginalize America in a century in which China, India, Brazil and other countries will steadily rise as super powers. In that context, McCain would lead America to a rapid decline in economic power and a total decline in national stability and prosperity.
Posted by: brent | September 15, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Palin’s tax returns? Not known. Palin’s record as governor? Not known. Palin’s exploitation of her three children for polical gains: Trig for his Dawn syndrome, Bristol for her pregnancy as a teenager and Track for his inability to go to college instead going to Irak. All these shortcomings show that Palin has not been able to organize her family, therefore the fundamental question is how she will organize America? God save America from McPali.
Posted by: BKMC | September 15, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Keep the Palin-bashing going.
You Dems just don’t get it. You’re shooting yourselves in the foot.
Posted by: JA | September 15, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Obama is right about 1 thing, he is an idiot. I just can’t believe that he ran that ad making fun of McCain’s POW injuries.
Obama can keep his corrupt version of change
- Dem for Palin/McCain – change you can see
Posted by: Mack | September 15, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
The idea that McCain and Palin represent change is laughable. McCain’s campaign has been staffed by lobbyists, and Palin is the mayor of earmarks. Is this all they have? They can’t win on the issues. Obama/Biden represent change – middle class tax cuts, green jobs, new energy sources, healthcare for everyone…that’s real change.
Posted by: jon in maryland | September 15, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Heard that Palin’s “taking a break” and going back to Alaska this week. Kind of like Bush’s work ethic! One week on/ one week off! And in the last 2 months of the campaign, no less! Why won’t they allow her to talk to reporters? If Obama muzzled Biden like this Carl Rove would have his head on a plate! Wait! Don’t pick on poor Sarah! I guess us Dems just don’t ‘get it’. What ‘it’ is, is that the Republicans use Sarah’s sex to push forward and grab the limelight, then retreat behind it (“Show DEFERENCE!” “Be NICE to Sarah!”) when she screws up. You can’t have it both ways, you CarlRovians….
Posted by: kcareymac | September 15, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Bush’s Economic Policy, “The chickens are coming home to roost”. The Economy is starting to spiral out of control, let’s see who the “Talking Heads blame for this crisis in banking?
Sarah Palin’s 15 minutes of fame is gone.
Posted by: Lookup | September 15, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
The biggest joke of the year is that Republicans and John McCain are for change. Funny stuff.
Its going to be another 4 years of war, deficit and weak dollar, Bankruptcy, and high gas prices.
Basically the destruction of the middle class!
Sarah Palin knows nothing. She is a yes woman. Thats it. They tell her what to say.
Be smart and vote Obama Biden 08.
Support real change in america!
Posted by: Stan | September 15, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Bush’s Economic Policy, “The chickens are coming home to roost”. The Economy is starting to spiral out of control, let’s see who the “Talking Heads” blame for this crisis in banking?
Sarah Palin’s 15 minutes of fame is gone.
Posted by: Lookup | September 15, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
I agree! How ANY VOTER can believe that McCain and Palin are “change” escapes me. The man has been in Washington for decades and adores Bush. Every claim they have made about her being a “maverick” has been proven false by the media. I would love to meet the voter who really think electing a Washington insider from the same party that has been in the White House for 8 years is CHANGE. Stunning!
Posted by: Ryan Healey | September 15, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Mack – McCain just stole Obama’s campaign of change. McCain is no reformer and Obama’s not corrupt, but McCain is the idea thief. Funny thing: people who are able to get good ideas can do it over and over. People who steal ideas can only repeat it when they aren’t being watched.
Like all Americans, I honor John McCain’s military service. You lie when you say that Obama mocked McCain’s war injuries … however, I do think it is pertinent that McCain is not tuned in to the digital world.
So I’ll be voting for Obama.
Posted by: Anne | September 15, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
99% of Democrats Give the Rest a Bad Name! COUNTRY FIRST! McCain/Palin 08.
Posted by: TPE | September 15, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Another Dem for Mccain/Palin !
Posted by: JULIE | September 15, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
McCain/Palin for Change because “change” is all you’ll have left in your pocket if you vote to continue the incompetent, failed economic policies of Bush/Cheney.
Posted by: NMP | September 15, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
The Gibson interview revealed the thinness Palins knowledge of Foreign and Domestic Policies.
Her big over-dose is to meet the media and answer varities of questions!
Posted by: Peace | September 15, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Eleven years before the current investigation into her dismissal of Alaska’s top cop, Sarah Palin was embroiled in a similar dispute over another personnel issue: her firing of the police chief in her hometown of Wasilla.
Check NEWSWEEK for the details of the story.
There is clearly a pattern here: abuse of power. On a national scale, we’ve seen enough of that in the Bush-Cheney administration.
McCain-Palin would mean an even further erosion of our democracy and of our government’s loyalty to our own Constitution.
Posted by: marian | September 15, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Another Dem for Mccain/Palin !
Posted by: JULIE | Sep 15, 2008 9:39:42 AM
———————————-
18 million and the votes go on the PALIN/Mccain ticket, it is a wonderful thing!!
Posted by: HP Boston | September 15, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am
Obama has lost his “change” mantra! He was so worried when Hillary continued in the primaries that he would not have time to “pivot” for the general election. Well, he was able to pivot and what has he gotten? His phony soundbite campaign, his lack of experience, his consistent backpedaling, and his lack of substance have caught up with him despite the blatant biased media trying to get him elected.
Now, they can dump on Palin just as they did with Hillary, but the American voters are not having any part of it. They see John McCain and Sarah Palin as mavericks who intend to bring real change with real substance.
Who would have thought that the “change we need” would be McCain/Palin? Find another soundbite slogan, Obama. Just words.
McCain/Palin ’08
Posted by: georgia | September 15, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am
Talk about change….they have done this so much their middle name should be “camelion”.
McCain started as “the maverick” , then the “straighttalk express” and now “change”. How many more things will they need to conform to in order to win?
Make you really wonder what they would do in order to win. Maybe sacrifice their principles? Look like Palin has already changed her views in order to alighn with the party.
Posted by: thetruth | September 15, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
I wonder if Palin realizes that McCain is just using her to pull the young, female vote. She acts like she can conquer the world with one year as a governor. She has a BIG awakening!!!
Posted by: forthegoodlife | September 15, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
I am surprised at how full of hate the democratic party has become. That sort of rhetoric does not win votes or move the country forward. “And wqhy is this spoiled child so spiteful – too much cake.”
Posted by: disambiguates | September 15, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am
MSM has been bitten in the butt…THE VIEW the GIBSON crapola has helped cement the truth of the bias in the media. Plain old mean and dirty, rude, disrespect for anything non obuma!
The hate is palpable.
The train to Obuma land is going to be as biased as all the stunts the media tries to pull off…women are derailing your choo choo boys!
WE ARE THE ONES NO ONE WAS EXPECTING!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | September 15, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
Keep the Palin-bashing going.
You Dems just don’t get it. You’re shooting yourselves in the foot.
Posted by: JA | Sep 15, 2008 9:18:23 AM
But it’s ok to bash Obama. Can you explain the double standard.
Posted by: zz | September 15, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
If Obama wants Change he is going to have to change his campaign. It is one thing to talk about it, and another to do something about it.
I do not see it, it appears to me that he is lost, doesn’t know what to do, and doesn’t know what change is.
What are the issues and what is he going to do about it?
So McCain is lying his rear end off, so what? Nothing that Obama can say or do to change that. So call him a liar and then move on with your message. It isn’t enough to call McCain a liar then walk away.
Posted by: Thinking | September 15, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Another white female for Mccain !!
Posted by: brigitte | September 15, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
You Dems just don’t get it. You’re shooting yourselves in the foot……..
Better to take one in the foot than
Take one in the Head and vote for
McDumbo the Clown of Wall Street..
How many big Banks go down before
the Election? The only Change McBush
Brings to the table is The United States
Becoming a third World Country
……………………………
Posted by: Anita Yova | September 15, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Obama plays games with soldiers’ lives–to gain political advantage. According to Amir Taheri in the NT Post:
While campaigning in public for a speedy withdrawal of US troops from Iraq, Sen. Barack Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence.
According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.
“He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview.
Obama: Ruthless cynical manipulation you can believe in.
Posted by: carl | September 15, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
WE ARE THE ONES NO ONE WAS EXPECTING!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | Sep 15, 2008 10:01:11 AM
Please get over yourself. Not all 18 mil that voted for Hillary are voting for McCain including myself and everyone I know. We know what’s at stake with having the republicans in office another 4 years.
Posted by: annie | September 15, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Keep the Palin-bashing going.
You Dems just don’t get it. You’re shooting yourselves in the foot.
Posted by: JA | Sep 15, 2008 9:18:23 AM
But it’s ok to bash Obama. Can you explain the double standard.
Posted by: zz | Sep 15, 2008 10:07:26 AM
————————–
OH ZZZZZZZZZZ who can bash BO… his stench is all over Chicago. He buys the votes he needs and he is STILL unable to close the deal. He killed off Hillary, he now tries to KILL off Sarah…he is dirt with a capital D!
The media never vets BO he is so empty there is so NOTHING there, when you look at an empty suit…IT IS EMPTY!
The DNC has tried to shove him down Americas throat but he has stuck in our craw!
WE ARE NOT SWALLOWING THIS PHONY!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | September 15, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Obama and his lunatic supporters in freefall as McCain continues to surge.
The latest evidence is the brand new Sienna poll of NY state voters which shows Mccain within 5 points of Obama in one of the most reliably democratic states in the country. In their last poll, Obama led by 18 points.
Maybe NY’ers are expressing their outrage at the fact that their Senator Hillary Clinton, despite her 18 million voters, was not selected as VP.
HILLARY 2012!
Posted by: ch | September 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Obama and his lunatic supporters in freefall as McCain continues to surge.
The latest evidence is the brand new Sienna poll of NY state voters which shows Mccain within 5 points of Obama in one of the most reliably democratic states in the country. In their last poll, Obama led by 18 points.
Maybe NY’ers are expressing their outrage at the fact that their Senator Hillary Clinton, despite her 18 million voters, was not selected as VP.
HILLARY 2012!
Posted by: ch | September 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
WE ARE THE ONES NO ONE WAS EXPECTING!!!
Posted by: HP Boston | September 15, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
massachusettes independent for mccain/palin
Posted by: natale from mass. | September 15, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Obama/Pelosi/Biden/Reid. Is this change?
Posted by: Kitty | September 15, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Lol, now McCain is the change guy. Too funny.
He is just a jealous guy who looks around at what others have and has to have that too.
Obsessed with celebrity and seeing Obama’s crowds, he first criticizes it and then seeks to have it for himself with his veep pick.
Seeing Obama running under the change theme (for something like 20 months) he first criticizes it and then seeks to have it for himself.
Sorry, but this McCain guy is just seeming more and more pathetic by the day.
Posted by: Paul | September 15, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am
Paul, Obama needs to tell people who he is and what he’s going to do. Bashing McCain is not working. And Obama’s change message falls on deaf ears when he’s tied at the hip to Pelosi/Biden/Reid.
Posted by: Kitty | September 15, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Charlie Gibson’s affirmative action and minority preference interview tactics:
Obama interview:
How does it feel to break a glass ceiling?
How does it feel to “win”?
How does your family feel about your “winning” breaking a glass ceiling?
Who will be your VP?
Should you choose Hillary Clinton as VP?
Will you accept public finance?
What issues is your campaign about?
Will you visit Iraq?
Will you debate McCain at a town hall?
What did you think of your competitor’s [Clinton] speech?
Palin interview:
Do you have enough qualifications for the job you’re seeking? Specifically have you visited foreign countries and met foreign leaders?
Aren’t you conceited to be seeking this high level job?
Questions about foreign policy
-territorial integrity of Georgia
-allowing Georgia and Ukraine to be members of NATO
-NATO treaty
-Iranian nuclear threat
-what to do if Israel attacks Iran
-Al Qaeda motivations
-the Bush Doctrine
-attacking terrorists harbored by Pakistan
Is America fighting a holy war? [misquoted Palin]
Posted by: Karen | September 15, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am
Charlie’s future question to Obama:
If you were a tree, what kind of tree would you be? where can I buy your tree? How much can I give to your campaign? Will you sign my hat?
Posted by: Karen | September 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
And now we see an ad called “original mavericks.”
Let’s see:
McCain wants you to see him as something other than the Washington elite he is, despite being on Capitol Hill for 26 years and a media darling for most of that time.
Palin wants you to see her as the fiscal conservative who balances budgets and opposes earmarks, despite leaving the town she mayored with its first public debt and being widely known as the Alaskan queen of earmarks.
Yep, they’re mavericks alright. But not the original ones. The original maverick was named Brett, and he was a Western conman. McCain and Palin are running a con, but its just an imitation of a TV show.
Posted by: Paul | September 15, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Since dems took control in November 2006
Unemployment rose 4.4% to 6.1%
Bank failures
Housing crisis
Posted by: Karen | September 15, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Kitty: “Paul, Obama needs to tell people who he is and what he’s going to do.”
I agree, but you have to understand how out of the hands of the candidates these things are. Are you saying Obama hasn’t said who is and what he plans to do?
The problem is what the media covers, and the media loves drama over insignificant issues.
Look at how much coverage we have had about lipstick, and how little we had about the candidates’ responses to Russian tanks in Georgia.
McCain found that the more outlandish his attacks become, the more media attention he gets. So that’s what we’re seeing, and there just isn’t much airtime left to hear much about what the candidates would actually do.
Posted by: Paul | September 15, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Change, you say?
Obama: voted with Dirty Harry Reid 98% of the time. Sharing in that 14% congressional approval rating.
Posted by: carl | September 15, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
McCain has been in Washington for almost 30 years and his headstrong. How is this rookie nobody gonna override him or bring any change.
Give me a break.
McCain doesn’t take her seriously and she was picked for the uninformed and gullible to think she is even gonna do anything but, be window dressing.
McCain is gonna rely on his advisers and Palin is not one of them.
McCain has a long record of dismissing women and he just slapped her on for the women who vote frivolously in choosing gender over issues.
He will probably have Liebermann as his real vp as a shadow one while Palin does ceremonial duties.
I can’t believe after the Bush years so many people are so gullible and silly minded.
Living in American Idol fantasyland.
Posted by: vwcat | September 15, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
John “Change…The Subject” McCain
Hey, did anybody else notice that the stock market just crashed under 8 years of REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP????
Posted by: Anthony | September 15, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
I can see the wingnuts are out in force today.
What i don’t get is how these wingers actually thing the republicans care about them.
they have fleeced them, sent their jobs away and leave them holding the bag. Wall street is crashing and these feeble minded dopes are the ones who will be paying for the golden parachutes of the CEOs.
The republicans are laughing at these gullible wingers who have fallen for their tripe for years, can’t make ends meet and still believe the party cares.
The republicans are stuffing their pockets with these gullible fools money and yet, they think they are better off under republicans while their houses are foreclosed on and the repo man is coming for the cars.
Get real.
The republicans are the true party of elitists. You man, Bush,is a Yale silver spoon boy and McSame cannot even remember how many houses he has.
Cindy goes to the convention in 300,000 outfits.
Yeah, the gop really cares about you in the middle and really cares about your economic security.
hahahahahahaha.
what a bunch of fools.
Posted by: vwcat | September 15, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Sarah Palin is a real American woman unlike the bra-burning,fist-in-the-air,screeching sluts and nuts on the left. Sarah will draw millions of right thinking patriots to the McCain ticket because she is what most American men and women want to see in the White House. Too bad she’s not at the top of the ticket.
Posted by: Ron | September 15, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Whew, Obama supporters are ratching up the nastiness. What’s up? I thought Obama was the almighty, basically unbeatable. Sounds a lot like fear, and it’s not pretty.
Why don’t we all step back and think about what’s best for our country instead of bashing anyone who doesn’t agree with us? What does changing people’s names (McBush) or calling people names really accomplish? Is that a selling point for the Obama “change” mantra? Doesn’t seem like change except to put a man in power who is so in love with himself it’s scary.
I don’t like the negative ads on either side, and I wish McCain would stop. It’s simply not necessary, and it pulls him down to Obama’s level. Let Obama sink himself – he’s well on his way. Too bad he was so obnoxious and arrogant that he would not even consider Clinton as a running mate. If he loses, rather than what I’m pretty sure will happen – white voters are “racists” – he has no one to blame but himself. His experience, his ethics, his judgment – all are lacking – and the empty rhetoric has started to fall flat except to the hard-core supporters or people who just won’t vote for a Republican for any reason.
Posted by: traci | September 15, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
So, just who is making race an issue in this campaign??
Joe Biden, Churchillian Orator, says to elect Obama simply because he is Black.
Democratic vice presidential candidate Joe Biden, campaigning in North Carolina where black votes could help swing the state to the Democrats, said today that electing a black person to the White House would be transformative.
Biden said the policies of running mate Barack Obama make his presidency even more urgent and declared this to be the most important election that any living person has seen in their lifetime. But he particularly singled out the meaning of electing someone who is black.
“That will be a transformative event in American politics and internationally,” Biden said. “That all by itself will be significant.”
“That all by itself” is all this ticket has going for it.
Posted by: carl | September 15, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Lol, Anthony, I love these coincidental juxtapositions. The housing crisis because Democrats seized Congress, etc.
Here’s another for you – the latest stock market collapse has coincided with McCain’s rise in the polls. Maybe investors are trying to tell us something?
And here’s another – almost 90 percent of our huge and growing national public debt happened after John McCain came to Washington. Sounds like somebody’s been asleep at the switch.
Posted by: Paul | September 15, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Ron, if you mean a pathological liar who is an incurious as George is and woefully unprepared for anything other then small time government in the wilderness as meaning a real woman, are you stuck in a cave.
And if you think being some holler roller, tongue speaking, wacko is being a ‘real woman’ you must like your women to be fundie light.
Again, wingers are just gullible fools.
Posted by: vwcat | September 15, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
no one would be stupid enough to pick someone like her.
———————-
GUS,
Never underestimate the stupidity of the masses in this country. The same psuedo-”patriots” that voted for Bush may very well believe all the BS that McCain/Palin are shoveling.
I now understand that most Americans could care less about policies or issues. They want “someone who’s just like them”.
Why ANYONE thinks that ordibnary and mediocre is best for our top leaders is beyond me, but that’s exactly what people are saying.
I’d think we would have learned by now that it might be a good idea to allow the EXTREMELY INTELLEGENT people lead for a change. But that’s just me.
I guess some prefer a person with a journalism degree who thinks the fact she can “see Russia from a remote island in Alaska” is a national security qualification.
Posted by: Facts over Fiction | September 15, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
Facts over – yep, I have to agree with your basic point. We as a collective people are dumb enough to pretty much do anything.
Remember, Laverne and Shirley was the top-viewed show for something like three years.
And the media plays to our collective dumbness. That’s why we get the exhaustive coverage of the silly stuff and not so much of the important stuff. This year I thought it might be different, given indicators of some real challenges ahead in both foreign and domestic policy. But that was just me expressing my part of the collective dumbness.
Posted by: Paul | September 15, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
The media aren’t the bad guys in the Palin discussion. It’s easy to accuse them of acting like sexists or big-city egomaniacs. Let’s be real, though.
McCain selected Palin for EXACTLY those reasons – because she is a woman from a little-known state, who can take some of the heat off McCain and behave like an attack dog against Barack Obama. Carl Rove even said she WAS NOT selected based on ability, it was purely a political move.
So far it seems to have worked. But one thing about over-hyped, one sided, media-exalted celebrities – they can fall just as quickly when the public hears the whole story.
I’ve heard the same thing said about Barrack many times. But Obama has survived incredible public and media scrutiny, including countless rumors and false accusations for over a year now.
Palin has only been out there 3 weeks. Sure the Republicans touted her as the greatest thing since sliced bread. (Oh, is that sexist? I guess I’m calling her a loaf of bread now by GOP smear standards)
We are just now learning about Palin’s LACK OF credentials and knowledge and her governing style via secrecy and personal vendetta. I find her lack of knowledge truly FRIGHTENING! And her “style” of government looks like a cabon copy of Cheney/Bush.
It’s no longer about the shovel full that was tosssed out at the GOP convention. The tryth will come out.
Palin reads her lines well, but chosing an unvetted VP may turn out to be the downfall of the GOP. Palin’s first interview made her look over-rehersed in Republican platitudes and totally unprepared for the job. Once the truth is known, we may see a change in the winds for Sarah Palin.
Posted by: Facts over Fiction | September 15, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Somebody needs to help the old codger Popeye. But a lying Hockey Mom isn’t who we need with her finger near the nuclear triggers of this country. Remember she doen’t blink she’s hard wired to act before thinking.
Posted by: depravedmaniac | September 15, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Today’s Siena poll of NY voters confirms internal polling from both parties: women are largely responsible for closing Barack Obama’s lead over John McCain this month.
Obama only has a 5-point lead over McCain now, 46-41 percent, significantly down from a lead of 8 points in August, 13 in July and 18 in June.
This is with no campaigning and few resources devoted to the state by McCain.
McCain’s gains have a lot to do with women moving over to support him. This month, 45% of women picked Obama, 43% McCain, and 11% are undecided.
Last month, 48% were supporting Obama, 36% McCain, and 15% were undecided.
Obama has a serious problem with convincing voters that he is qualified to be president. 30 percent of voters polled said he was not qualified, compared with 17% for McCain.
Posted by: ch | September 15, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am
One of the first things Governor Sarah Palin did upon taking office was to have a TANNING BED installed in the Governor’s Mansion for her use.
“The governor did have a tanning bed put in the Governor’s Mansion,” Roger Wetherell, chief communications officer of Alaska’s Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, confirmed to this newspaper. “It was done shortly after she took office [in early 2007] and moved into the mansion.”
Good to know where Sarah Palin’s priorities are. I wonder where that money for the tanning bed came from… They cost between $10,000 – $35,000.
See the full story on Narco.
Posted by: Narco News | September 15, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Just get on with it…do as the people in this country apparently desire…
Split the da*n country in half. Half of it can go European and start a socialistic structured society and the other half can start a REAL free market capitalistic society.
The polarization in this country is astounding.
Posted by: ClassicalLiberal | September 15, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Yes, and now we find out that while Obama made his much-publicized visit to Iraq in July, the biased media failed to report on conversations Obama held with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad where he attempted to have troop withdrawals delayed until after the November elections.
According to the Iraqi Foreign Minister, delaying troop withdrawals was the main theme of his conversations during his visit.
Posted by: SandyB | September 15, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
She doesn’t help the change argument just because someone says so. Her positions are solidly Bush-like, and along with McCain, she advocates the typical Repub line.
By the way “What’s the Bush Doctrine”? Aside from strangley coopting the word change, she knows nothing about the minutiae of US government. Beware America, Dan Quayle is back and in disguise.
Posted by: indytucker | September 15, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Even though women should stay at home, I can’t help enjoying this exception of Palin. I’d rather have a white woman than a black man any day.
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I don’t buy for one second that she represents change. In fact, she erodes McCain’s appeal among independents and undermines any hope for change. Because the more stuff that comes out about her, the more it becomes apparent that she is corrupt, ignorant and unprincipled like George W. Bush.
Posted by: Ni | September 15, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
We’ve had eight years here, where the Administration has played God and done whatever it wanted to, oblivious to the consequences of their actions.
Now, we Americans are suffering for the bad decisions of those at the top. It”s insane. Why would anyone consider voting for someone who supported those policies? Out of party loyalty? What’s that going to be worth to you, when you’re unemployed or homeless?
Posted by: wolf | September 15, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Obama has never voted for “change”
in his life!
McCain voted for campaign finance
reform, McCain-Feingold and a
comprehensive immigration reform bill
which unfortunately was defeated!
The only thing Obama has changed is
his positions and his clothes, not
necessarily in that order!
Get the facts Obama Zombies!
Posted by: reaganfan | September 15, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
reaganfan – are you saying Republicans should now like McCain’s campaign finance efforts and immigration reform?
Man. The GOP is taking so many twists and turns now, I don’t know what the party is for anymore – well, except winning.
I even read that McCain was now saying he wants more regulations on Wall St. But that’s today. Republicans will fall in line and call him visionary. And tomorrow when McCain says we need less regulation, Republicans will fall in line and say, “see, he understands markets.”
McCain is truly a candidate who would rather lose his integrity than lose an election.
Posted by: Paul | September 15, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
I found the video of the now infamous SNL Skit that everyone is searching for. Its right here http://www.oneangryman.com and it is truely one of the funniest things I have ever witnessed. Tina Fey has captured Sarah Palin like no other.
Posted by: Ken Maddox | September 15, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
“Even though women should stay at home, I can’t help enjoying this exception of Palin. I’d rather have a white woman than a black man any day” Harold Reimann
What does that mean, dont vote for him because hes black or dont vote for him because he is not qualified because he is black or what, what does that mean… Some are saying that he is the one bringing up the race card, the sex card I see it more on here from OUR GREAT AMERICAN COUNTRYMEN, more then in any of McCain or Obamas speechs…Its not the Republicans or the Democratic parties pulling the country in different directions, its the people the voters who are racist and sexist on BOTH sides…
Posted by: Cicly | September 15, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
The Israelites were stubborn. They disobeyed just about every law that God gave them, except one. God told them never to have a stranger for a king. BO is a stranger in more ways than just being black. He has moslem influence. He has evil democratic influence. But being black should be enough to disqualify him in God’s eyes. By the way, racism is a leftist term first used by a German-Jew in 1936. I don’t subscribe to it.
Tell you what, if South Africa elects a white man, if Japan elects a Korean, if Mexico elects a white American, than I still would not elect a black man to run this white, Israelite country. You don’t know we’re of the tribe of Manasseh who along with brother Ephraim, the UK, received the blessing and birthright from Almighty God? Check the truth at eli3.tripod.com.
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Oh, I forgot, if Arabs elect a Jew.
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Paul you Miss the Point!
McCain has a record of bucking his
party and initiating reforms(change)!
To quote Hillary Clinton,
“Obama has a speech he gave in 2002″!
Posted by: reaganfan | September 15, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
Why even speak to these evil democrats? When I come across one I see abortion, sodomy, women’s lib and multiculturalism. And so I leave rapidly.
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Has anyone seen MAD’s Alfred E. Obama? A black Alfred E. Neuman. The Republicans should buy it and put it up on Times Square. The caption under the picture is choice, CHOICE! “YES, WE CAN’T!”
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
When I come across an evil Republican, I run the other way, for all I see is hypocrisy, immoral wars, an economy in ruins, big money lobbyists, bribery, sex scandals and the like. They are the anti-Christ, Harold
Posted by: Hedley Lamar | September 15, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
reagafan:
A more recent Hillary quote, right after the DNC:
“No way, not ever, no McCain.”
Posted by: Hedley Lamar | September 15, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Not surprised, given your comments Harold, that you still read Mad magazine. Most of us gave that up at age 14.
Posted by: Hedley Lamar | September 15, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Leave Mel Brooks out of it.
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Oh, I don’t read MAD. This was in the Chicago Tribune. Should have been in all the newspappers!
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Immoral wars? Do you know what the Bush Doctrine really is? You take two of our buildings and we take two of your countries. That’s why the moslems won’t strike us again until BO is President. Vote for BO you ungrateful idiots!
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Now I know a war that would definitely be moral, Civil War. Right against Left. Just remember, the military supports the Right!
Posted by: Harold Reimann | September 15, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Hedley:
Hillary said that so she won’t be blamed for Obama’s coming defeat!
She actually meant what she said about
Obama’s serious lack of experience!
Posted by: reaganfan | September 15, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
A Real-Life Soap Opera About the Suffragettes
Senator Clinton and Governor Palin are proof that women can and do diverge on important issues.
Even on the question of whether women should vote!
Most people are totally in the dark about HOW the suffragettes won votes for women, and what life was REALLY like for women before they did.
Suffragettes were opposed by many women who were what was known as ‘anti.’
The most influential ‘anti’ lived in the White House. First Lady Edith Wilson was a Washington widow who married President Wilson in 1915, after the death of his pro-suffrage wife.
The First Lady’s role in Wilson’s decision to jail and torture Alice Paul and hundreds of other suffragettes will never be fully known, but she was outraged that these women picketed her husband’s White House.
I’d like to share a women’s history learning opportunity…
“The Privilege of Voting” is a new free e-mail series that follows eight great women from 1912 – 1920 to reveal ALL that happened to set the stage for women to win the vote.
It’s a real-life soap opera about the suffragettes! And it’s ALL true!
Powerful suffragettes Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst are featured, along with TWO gorgeous presidential mistresses, First Lady Edith Wilson, Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan and Alice Roosevelt.
There are tons of heartache on the rocky road to the ballot box, but in the end, women WIN!
Thanks to the success of the suffragettes, women have voices and choices!
Exciting, sequential episodes are great to read on coffeebreaks, or anytime.
Subscribe free at
http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/subscribe.html
Posted by: Virginia Harris | September 15, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
MCCAIN PALIN – GEORGE W. BUSH
INTERNATIONAL ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS PRESIDENT
* I attacked and occupied two countries.
* I am the first president in US history to order a military occupation of a sovereign nation against the will of the United Nations and the world community.
* I withdrew from or abrogated more international treaties than any president in US history.
* I refuse to recognize the jurisdiction of the World Court.
* I refuse to allow international or Red Cross access to US prisoners of war.
* I no longer abide by the Geneva Conventions.
* I took the world’s sympathy after 9-11 and in less than a year made the US the most resented country in the world, possibly the biggest diplomatic failure in US history.
* I am the first US president to have a majority of the people of Europe (71%) view my presidency as the greatest threat to world peace and stability.
* I am the first US president to have the people of South Korea feel more threatened by the US than by their immediate neighbor, North Korea.
* I refused United Nations election inspectors access during the 2002 US elections.
* I am the first president in US history to have the United Nations remove the US from its Human Rights Commission.
* I am the first president in US history to have the United Nations remove the US from its Elections Monitoring Board.
———————————————————————-
ECONOMIC ACCOMPLISHMENTS AS PRESIDENT
* I spent the U.S. surplus and shattered the record for the biggest annual deficit in history.
* I set the all-time record for biggest annual spending increases, more than any other president in US history.
* I set a record for the most private bankruptcies in any 12-month period.
* I set the all-time record for the most foreclosures in any 12-month period.
* I set the all-time record for the biggest drop in the history of the stock market.
* I presided over the biggest corporate stock market fraud in any country in the history of the world.
* After taking the entire month of August off for vacation, I presided over the worst security failure in US history.
* In my first two years in office over 2 million Americans lost their jobs.
* I cut unemployment benefits for more out-of-work Americans than any president in US history.
* I presided over the biggest energy crises in US history and refused to intervene when corruption was revealed.
* I presided over the highest gasoline prices in US history and refused to use the national reserves as past presidents have.
* I cut health care benefits for war veterans.
Posted by: Steven | September 16, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
This will be the first year, I vote for the Democratic ticket. I feel my personal opinions and choices count, in this country. To continue to make the rich, richer, only makes 95% of the people poorer.I don’t want my constitutional rights, to be taken away by the rich anymore. People miss the fact that, 5% of the people dictate how the 95% of the people live. Yet that 5% are the ones who shutdown unions and companies and move them overseas, believing it will make them richer. This War on Terror is to much profit for the 5%, yet the 95% are paying the bill for it. Vote for America, not War.Vote Obama, not Bush.
Remember Chaney as V.P. shot his best friend in the face.If Palin is V.P., she may also shoot her best friend in the face. Beware being Palins best friend.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 16, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm