The Pork Wars, Part 3
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin co-byline an oped in the Wall Street Journal on the Fannie/Freddie bailout. But perhaps of more interest is the Journal’s take on Palin’s position on pork and the Bridge to Nowhere: "Record Contradicts Palin’s ‘Bridge’ Claims," is the title of the story.
Palin "endorsed the multimillion dollar project during her gubernatorial race in 2006. And while she did take part in stopping the project after it became a national scandal, she did not return the federal money. She just allocated it elsewhere….
"Why is this one issue such a big deal? Sen. McCain’s anti-earmarks stance has been paramount to his campaign. The Arizona senator has blamed everything from the Minneapolis bridge collapse to Hurricane Katrina on Congress’s willingness to stuff bills full of pork barrel spending. As such, Gov. Palin’s image as a ‘reformer’ is part of the storyline the McCain campaign needs to complement the top of its ticket. Her quip about passing on the bridge and ‘building it ourselves’ has been a staple of her stump."
Obama, the Journal says, requested $311 million in earmarks last year. "In comparison, Gov. Palin has requested $750 million in her two years as governor — which the AP says is the largest per-capita request in the nation."
- jpt
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
This type of critical examination of Palin’s record smacks of sexism – the McCain campaign.
Posted by: SpaceCat | September 9, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
McCain/Palin and liars and resume forgers! Sooner or later Americans will wake up to this shameful scam. Liars!
Posted by: Kevin | September 9, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Well now we know she not only likes moose, she loves pork.
Posted by: Gus | September 9, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Sarah Palin’s earmark requests amount to $295 per person for each of the two years she has been governor.
Contrast this with Obama’s ear-marks, that amount to a meager $25 per person in the state of Illinois. If you throw in this year’s earmark requests ($0), then it goes down to $13 per person per year.
Sarah Palin – the reformer??? No way, No McCain.
Posted by: Harold Wilson | September 9, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Does America care that Palin and McCain are out right LYING to our faces? Or are we so blinded that it does not mater?
Posted by: Erik | September 9, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
It was fun while it lasted right McShame
Posted by: jim | September 9, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
When she was Mayor of Wasilla, she ended up getting $5000 per person in ear-marks.
This is significantly more than the $1200 check she sent to each Alaskan resident from the ‘Windfall profits TAX’ that SHE IMPOSED on the oil companies.
Posted by: Harold Wilson | September 9, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
GALLUP: McCain opens 15-point lead among independents… Read it and weep Jake “in the tank 4Obama” Tapper
Posted by: Country First | September 9, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
McCain raises 5 million dollars in Obamas back yard of Chicago in 5 hours
Posted by: Country First | September 9, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
LOL, notice how the obama supporters ignore Obama’s outragous amount of pork
including the porkfat that got his wife a 250K raise.
Posted by: trettion | September 9, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
More bad news for Obama campaign as they revel in pork and lard tirade :
Latest Gallup polls shows that majority of independents now prefer McCain over Obama, 52% to 37%
McCain 52%
Obama 37%
That is is 15% lead … checkmate.
Posted by: McCain/Palin 2008 | September 9, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
“When she was Mayor of Wasilla, she ended up getting $5000 per person in ear-marks. God alone knows how much she actually lobbied for?!!
This is significantly more than the $1200 check she sent to each Alaskan resident from the ‘Windfall profits TAX’ that SHE IMPOSED on the oil companies.
”
so you’re saying that she got 6200 for each of her consitutates?
that’s a GREAT MAYOR!
Posted by: trettion | September 9, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
“At a rally today, Sen. McCain again asserted that Sen. Obama has requested nearly a billion in earmarks. In fact, the Illinois senator requested $311 million last year, according to the Associated Press, and none this year. In comparison, Gov. Palin has requested $750 million in her two years as governor — which the AP says is the largest per-capita request in the nation.”
What else can be said?
The Republican way, claim something and they do not have to defend it. IF they say it, it is true.
Posted by: Thinking | September 9, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
The analysis gets more interesting when you break down the numbers:
Alaksa population: 670,053
Illinois population: 12,831,970
(2006 Census numbers)
Thus, Alaska’s average $375 million per year = $559.65 per person, versus Illinois’ $311 million = $24.24 per person. Yes, Alaska’s earmarks = more than 23 times higher per person than Illinois.
And then take into account the following:
Alaska has a $5 billion budget surplus, Illinois a $2 billion deficit. And yet Alaska gets around $1.85 back for every $1 it puts into the federal coffers; Illinois — $0.75 for each $1.00. So, not only are Alaska’s earmarks 23 times bigger than Illinois’, the citizens of Illinois are actually subsidizing the citizens of Alaska (who pay no state income or sales tax, and who also get a cash payment each year from an oil profits tax…which is apparently ok for Alaskans, but not for the rest of us).
So, I ask – which state is being conservative when it comes to earmarks? Consider that on a per-capita basis, Alaska’s $375 million in earmarks would equal nearly $7.2 BILLION in Illinois…
Hyporcrites? Yes. Liars? Yes. Mavericks? Not quite.
Posted by: Annoyed in VA | September 9, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
what changes
what answers
Mccain and Palin are playing people
what changes are they going to make…because so far they have not listed on change from the bush administration that deals with our economy and healthcare and taxes and social security…
what changes what answers…
they have none besides keeping us on the road to the cliff.
throw the bums out.
Posted by: dl | September 9, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Obama’s career “earmarks” … the figure … what is it?
As for Palin, she played the big-boys’ established money game for her constituents — so what?
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
The whole state of Alaska is one big welfare state. McCain is against the windfall Tax on oil companies, saying it will raise the price of oil to the average citizen. Yet, this is exactly what Palin did in Alaska. The difference is of course she returns the money to Alaskans and the rest of us pay for it.
Posted by: Thinking | September 9, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
everyone should be reading
annoyed in VA
post below
most revealing comment I have seen in a long time and pulls the curtain back on the wall of silence that they are trying to redecorate Palin in.
this woman is not cool in the slightest and threw scummy Politicians out of office for her own scummy leadership to step in.
and now mccain is showing he will hide that fact just like Bush cheney did with wmd, katrina, and ALL the rest of it…
this is just them going for their 9th year of the same bull that got us here.
Posted by: dl | September 9, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Thinking is linkless as per usual for obama fans
Posted by: trettion | September 9, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
when you say so what about Palin’s earmarks…
go look at the per capita ratios of Illinois to Alaska residents…
how much each person got from those scummy earmarks that they are talking out of both sides of their mouths…
so in essence we paid for the residents of Alaska to get that big tax rebate with her earmarks…and her taxing the enormous profits that her state got from being an oil economy…that is subsidized by federal earmarks…ugh
throw the bums out
Posted by: dl | September 9, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
“Obama’s career “earmarks” … the figure … what is it?”
over 1 billion..
including 250 K raise for his wife
Posted by: trettion | September 9, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
The former political director of Reagan, Ed Rollins is quoted as saying that the selection of Palin has been a game-changer and has energized the Republican party like no one since Ronald Reagan did four decades ago.
Posted by: McCain/Palin 2008 | September 9, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
I think I love Palin’s picture in the Nowhere Alaska 99901 T shirt, she sporeted during her race for that states Governor’s job. Shows she is a liar about not supporting the beridge and how big a smart ass she is. Not to mention as Governor she didn’t send the money for that bridge back to Washington when they then decided not to build it.
Posted by: QuicksdrawMcGraw | September 9, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Interesting to see Obama act like the birdge to nowhere was such a bad thing, I mean the guy only voted in favor of it twice. The second time was not to shift funds from the bridge to Katrina cleanup. Didn’t seem like he thought so bad about it before. Oh and here’s a trivia question, which party has a ticket in which both candidates supported the bridge and never in any official capacity did anything to stop it? The democrats!
Also what was said is that Obama has requested near 1 billion in earmarks (as in all 3 years), not near 1 billion in earmarks in one year. To say he has none this year is highly misleading because he has earmarks for the 2008 fiscal year and has barely been at work since running for prez (like every other senator who runs). I think Barry’s total is 740 million (his alone plus those he supported) which included 9 or so million for Michelle Obama’s bosses (university of chicago) and 3.5 million for clients of Joe Biden’s son. And its not as if Biden has given up earmarks either, what was he at like 85 million? McCain 0 in earmarks.
Posted by: Zaggs | September 9, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Again McCain/Palin it doesn’t matter what any of your GOP cronies have to say your Popeye the sailor boy is behind where it actualy counts in the electoral race.
Posted by: depravedmaniac | September 9, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
What’s not to understand? Pork is excess spending in someone else’s district or state. Federal “help” is what is granted to your state or district. Help becomes pork when the outcry from the rest of the country exposes the federal “help” being given to your district or state. Just ask Sarah Palin.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 9, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Well, McCain did say he’d make the worst offenders famous…
Posted by: Deep Release | September 9, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
The presidency of McCain and Palin will be a bridge to nowhere. If you think the deficit is high now, just wait.
Posted by: Reason | September 9, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Alaska’s earmarks request allows them to then return tax dollars to its citizens. Well I think the OPM should audit how much ear mark monies have been given Alaska, then how much tax dollars Alaska has returned form its oil tax to its citizens, then send Alaska a bill for the return of all Federal money up to that state tax returned amount.
Posted by: Lukeskytalker | September 9, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Not music to Obama camp ears… key battleground states that Hillary is very strong it turning RED :
Lates State Polls
Ohio : McCain +7%
Virginia : McCain +2%
Indiana : McCain +2%
Yicks !
Posted by: McCain/Palin 2008 | September 9, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Who cares!
A lose now means the democrats will destroy themselfs with blame!
Hillary will never be the first female vp let alone the first female President!
God will be back in school!
Healthcare will be for people who work for it!
All illegals will be rounded up and kicked out!
You want a pay rise! Work harder do more hours!
GOP your time is now!
Posted by: GOPbackin | September 9, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Mavericks you say? Really?
Then would you care to explain why Keating is one of McCain’s largest bundlers, bundling 5 million for his campaign? Yes, that Keating. Remember the Keating 5?
Where is your maverick now?
Posted by: landlocked | September 9, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
McCain/Plain
Not one of those three states is necessary to Obama to reach 270 electors. LOL
Posted by: Barney Phiffe | September 9, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Notice that it said Obama “requested” 311 million…not that he got it.
He requested 0 this year.
And notice that Alaska got and kept the Bridge to Nowhere money.
Doesn’t sound like Palin is much of a reformer to me.
Posted by: Just wondering | September 9, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Palin put her budget online for the people to see how their money was being spent.
Obama needs to disclose his earmarks. One Billion in three years.
Millions to homes that became slums
Thousands to his wife’s employer
Thousands to Father Pfleger
Millions to a garden that never developed
Millions to Ayer’s Annenburg Project.
He wastes money–we saw it in Chicago and we saw it in Denver.
Obama will waste our money too.
Posted by: riley | September 9, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Mavricks remember the Ford Maverick the worst car on the road, would burst into flames when struck from behind.
Posted by: depravedmaniac | September 9, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Were Number 1 Were Number 1 Were Number 1 Were Number 1 a McC rally sounds like a pep rally at a football game. 26 years of do nothing and yet now he’s going to champion change yea right, lie some more Johnny boy Popeye.
Posted by: Ernest T Bass | September 9, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Does she shoot that pork from a helicopter? I agree with dl, read Annoyed in VA below, and then tell me she’s a maverick who is going to stop earmarks. Not based on her actual history!!!! No wonder she has a high approval rating — she’s given Alaskans our money!!!!
Posted by: obamamama | September 9, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
How funny all these Clinton supporters are going to vote away Hillarys only chance at being the first female President.. Thinking its a protest vote on her behalf!Ppalin is a rockstar and libs are FOOLS!
Posted by: GOPbackin | September 9, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Peoplke in Alaska get more ear marked money per person than any other state in America about $550. per person, Obama state gets about $24. per person so whats your repis point oh yea, BS.
Posted by: texmexborderjumper | September 9, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
So when Obama becomes president people can quit their jobs and let his big Gov’t take care of them.
$1000 carrot to people even if they don’t pay taxes
Free health insurance even illegals.
The rich and small business who worked hard will support those that didn’t.
I’m not rich but Income Redistribution is not the “change” I want.
Posted by: harry | September 9, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Not even a good try Mary Anne
Posted by: QuicksdrawMcGraw | September 9, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I’m no Democrat (I support Bob Barr), but it amazes me that McCain/Palin supporters hear the M-P campaign’s lies and distortions about “reforming” and “taking on the big boys” and simply roll over with their bellies and paws in the air. All they ever do in response is say something negative about Obama (eg Trettion over there). Can you actually defend Palin as a reformer when it has now been proven both that she kept the $$ for the “bridge to nowhere” and has requested so much pork during her career? (Or are you going to try to argue that the Wall Street Journal is a liberal rag? Good luck.) So what if Obama has requested pork if Palin has requested even more? Obama requesting less pork than Palin doesn’t prove that Palin is a “reformer,” in any universe.
Defend her and McCain on something where you won’t have to deny the truth *or* slander Obama. Obama’s job as a community organizer, even if he had accomplished nothing, doesn’t make her a great mayor. (Especially with that sports complex she didn’t close out the paperwork for, leading to double the costs.) Repeatedly appealing to Obama’s supposed faults instead of her supposed actual, truthful strengths just makes you (and her) look weak.
Go ahead–keep defending them as they outright lie about their commitment to no-pork, small government, fiscal responsibility, and taking on the big-boy, back-scratching culture. I don’t see any evidence that Sarah Palin stands for any of this. And her hiding from the press — as if only the people who see her give speeches in person are those “real people” she would defend in Washington — suggests to me arrogance and fear, not honesty and boldness.
I’m sick of being lied to. I’m sick of candidates and candidates’ supporters having nothing but attacks because they can’t factually defend their own positions. That’s why I support Barr, when McCain could have had my vote.
Posted by: Saucy | September 9, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Obamabots are now the world’s foremost expert on Alaska. Please tell us what Obama did for South Chicago or Biden did for Delaware.
This is an historical election. It is the first time a Presidential candidate ran against the opposing Vice-Presidential Candidate.
Posted by: geevill | September 9, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
First of all I am a white college educated medical professional woman registered Republican.
I have researched extensively and I discovered Sarah Palin has done done what she claims. Actually found she is lying in her political claims. John McCain supporting her false claims!!
Bridge to Nowehre she totally supported publicly and only changed positions once bill was dead in Washington. Then she jumped ship and says publicly she is against. She kills bill at state level. All after bill was dead in Washington.
Clams she didn’t want Bridge is in all ways a lie! I have searched her history up in Alaska and found she has done this severtal times before.
Sarah Palin asked for lots of earmarks for Alaska! This is lie saying she is not doing.
I am sad to discover my own Republican party is lying to American voters. Specifically John McCain and Sarah Palin are/were. My excitement sure disappeared quickly once I discovered truth. And yes, anyone can verify I am registered Republican and have been for years. I am for true facts and these two are not telling truth to us!
Posted by: Sharonklim | September 9, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Obama will kill small businesses.
And along with that millions of jobs.
Out of desperation yesterday Obama said he would keep Bush tax cuts while the economy is bad.
Who can trust his word he has flipped so many times: FISA, public finance, gun control, abortion, the surge.
With Obama, Pelosi, Reid in control our guns are in jeopardy as well as the economy.
Posted by: riley | September 9, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
“his is an historical election. It is the first time a Presidential candidate ran against the opposing Vice-Presidential Candidate.”
Well geeevillll, that’s what happens when a so called man (McCain) hides behind a woman’s skirts (Palin).
Posted by: Texan | September 9, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
With Obama, Pelosi, Reid in control our guns are in jeopardy as well as the economy.
What a crock of B.S. I’ve been packing a gun for more years then most and NOBODY wants to take it. Just another load of B.S. from “the boogie man will get you” right wing nut machine.
Posted by: Texan | September 9, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Obama has done absolutely nothing to fight corruption in Chicago.
He constantly points to one thing he has done to prove reform–an ethics bill many years ago that was actually someone else’s bill.
McCain/Palin actually have proof of reform. Obama as usual–all talk.
Posted by: harry | September 9, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
McBush/McPalin “We are great because we say so!” They feed the masses a load of crap and the masses beg for more. Good to see the Republicans platform hasn’t changed and is still working for them. “Never misunderestimate the stupidity of the American public.”
Posted by: Joe | September 9, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
“I believe on the topic of reform the choice is between McCain who’s taken zero earmarks in 20+ years to Obama who takes $1M/day for his friends in family”.
I think the choice is between liars like McCain/Palin and people that want better for the middle class Obama/Biden.
Posted by: Texan | September 9, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Barney … I am not a big fan of CNN but the latest state polls that CNN tracks shows that :
McCain 43%
Obama 42%
and this is after all the INVESCO, GREEK TEMPLE stunt Obama pull off in Denver, CO. …hmmm, $money down the drain.
I am sure in your equation, CO is swing state.
Posted by: McCain/Palin 2008 | September 9, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Too bad the WSJ op-ed is misleading. I’m sure it wasn’t a news article because it wasn’t fact-checked.
1. Obama has indeed requested almost $1 billion in earmarks in his first *three years* in the Senate. This year, he got smart and decided he couldn’t do that anymore and claim to be a guardian of the people’s money.
2. When running for governor, Palin said that if Congress passed the earmark (which she did not request) she would not stand in its way. The funds were coming to Alaska as part of its federal tranportation grant; the earmark specified that it had to be spent on the BtN. The “she kept the money anyway” meme is bogus. Alaska was getting the money for transportation, earmark or no earmark.
3. When she was elected and saw that the bridge was going to be far too expensive and that Alaska would have to pony up funds, she decided that the funds were best spent finding another way to solve the problem and she killed the project.
4. Obama and Biden both voted to keep the money for the BtN when it was proposed by Coburn to redirect it to Katrina aid. Palin did not have a vote in that matter.
I think both sides on this issue have cut corners in trying to simplify their description of what happened, but that’s the story as I read it.
Posted by: RealisticLib | September 9, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
“Obama’s career “earmarks” … the figure … what is it?”
over 1 billion..
including 250 K raise for his wife
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Looks like this may be the Non Story of the year., But It does put Palin in a good light in a stormy media cycle. Has anyone else seen this story that Palin might be pregnant again?
Posted by: Peter | September 9, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
McCain has the Obama camp very confused.
They think they are running against Palin the VP candidate.
Poor Joe–he may suddenly be asked to take a dive so Hillary can once again save Obama.
Posted by: harry | September 9, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
A majority of Americans (52%) now consider John McCain a strong and decisive leader, while 41% say the same about Barack Obama.
That is a 11% lead !!!
Posted by: McCain/Palin 2008 | September 9, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
mccains vp pick is sooo scary
mccain change we can fear
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 9, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
“1. Obama has indeed requested almost $1 billion in earmarks in his first *three years* in the Senate. This year, he got smart and decided he couldn’t do that anymore and claim to be a guardian of the people’s money.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
“Poor Joe–he may suddenly be asked to take a dive so Hillary can once again save Obama.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
CNN has interviewed Palin’s ex-aid, who clearly explained that the bridge that Palin supported in 2006 was not the one she looked at when she got into her office. The former is only half the budget, and was considered necessary for transportation purpose. The latter, was way over a waste, and that’s why Palin killed it. She said we need a bridge, and we can build one on our own.
The MSM has completely lost their credibility – so many of friends now treat everything they talk about Palin with suspicion.
The MSM bias is a reason that Obama has been pumped up so high, now he is going to have a spectacular fall.
Posted by: amy | September 9, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Who is running for GOP president? Also, what makes McScam better this election versus the two prevoius elections he ran? Has he’s flipped and flopped so many times to make his lies more believable now?
I can’t believe that the public would fall for his lies especially now with all that’s in going on in the economy. How ignorant on the publics part and how savay of McScam this time around.
Posted by: Your Guidance | September 9, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
Obama’s TV ad people should make an ad showing a Ford Mavrick struck from behind bursting in flames and have the caption Change you could be burned by MCCain/Palin.
Posted by: QuicksdrawMcGraw | September 9, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I like how an Earmark for a Natural Gas Pipeline in Alaska is being compared to the $311,000,000 in Earmarks Obama sought for pork projects in Chicago. The pipeline benefits all of the US, so the Per Capita comparison is a tainted statistic.
Posted by: Tom Genin | September 9, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Republicans=liars=Abuse of Power
Ask Senator McCain about how he tried to physically assault and then tried to financially ruin councilwoman Kathy Dubs because she dared point out that a land deal he tried to cut for the state was for his personal profit.
Posted by: Danny | September 9, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Gee a Gov requested more than a Senator in state subsidies….listen Jake Obama’s record with pork barrels isn’t hidden. I know that ya’ll know that Obama subsidized his wife’s employer and local radical local churches. There were several conflicts of inhterest that are being ignored.
State so called pork barrel money obtained by governors is not the same as the Senate money hidden in budgets and legislation that has been paying off Obama and his cohorts and swaying the business of the people.
When are you guys going to take a look at the very failed record of Obama’s cronyism? Why is Palin fair game and Obama off limits?
What about the on-going Rezko investigation? If Obama didn’t “pay to play” he certainly was one of the few who benefited for this little piece of Chicago corruption.
TELL THE STORY!
Posted by: Jackie | September 9, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
The media should vet Obama! He has been cuddled by the media as their God-child who must be protected from scrutiny! Now, the media wants blood from Palin! Draw some from Obama, get to his Harvard funding, his earmarks/pork barrell – hidden in legislation tag ons! ($1million a day of taxpayer money for Obama)! Cha-Cha-Ching.. Change that you can believe in!
At least Palin Pipeline benefits the whole country and may be exactly what this country needs to wean itself off foreign suppliers. Way to go Palin! That is real change we can look forward to!
Posted by: Daniel G Garcia | September 9, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
listen Jake Obama’s record with pork barrels isn’t hidden. I know that ya’ll know that Obama subsidized his wife’s employer and local radical local churches. There were several conflicts of inhterest that are being ignored …
State so called pork barrel money obtained by governors is not the same as the Senate money hidden in budgets and legislation that has been paying off Obama and his cohorts and swaying the business of the people.
When are you guys going to take a look at the very failed record of Obama’s cronyism? Why is Palin fair game and Obama off limits?”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 9, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
McCain/Palin 2008,
That is the problem with you Republicans. You treat elections like football games and chess matches instead of discussing issues. I thought you guys were about reform? Seems to me it is the same old crap. Repubulicans message has always been to do nothing and that is exactly how they govern.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 9, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
Wasn’t part of the money Obama got in pork given to his church?
Posted by: Melissa | September 9, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
SpaceCat,
What is sexism is McCain’s dog and pony show he is doing with Palin right now. Scrutinatization of public official’s record is an obligation the media has to the public.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 9, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Concerned in OH,
Republicans don’t give a damn about working people. Never have, never will. They mask this indifference by scaring people of their opponent. Be honest. What protections for working people have Republicans ever championed. Republicans have always championed businesses….the same businesses who are shipping jobs overseas and hiring illegal aliens at dirt cheap wages. Meanwhile, working Americans suffer.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 9, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
How is McCain going to rid Washington of special interests when his campaign is run by lobbyists? During his Georgia sabre-rattling, his chief mouthpiece on the matter had been paid $800,000 for lobbying on behalf of the Goverment of Georgia! Other members have his staff have lobbied for some of the world’s most brutal dictators and thugs.
Palin is now an anti-earmark crusader! When did this transformation occur? As Mayor of a town of 6 or 7,000 people she paid a lobbyist associated with Good Government Hero Jack Abramhoff $2.7 million to drag in $27 million worth of pork.
This is complete and utter b.s. Hats off to the WSJ for calling them out on this.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 9, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Sarah Palin’s Wasilla record:
* Tax collection soared 38%
* Government expenditures increased 33%
* Spent more than $300 million in pork barrel
* Left town in $26 million in debt
* Fired police chief because she didn’t like him
* Remodeled office twice in six years
* Bullied local librarian
Posted by: FailinPalin | September 9, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Upshot of yesterday’s comments and this Op-Ed: McCain/Palin want to raise interest rates. That’s their ownership society: you’re on your own.
Posted by: Dan | September 9, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Obama IS the bridge to nowhere…..
Posted by: Foodforthought | September 9, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
OBAMA = $1 BILLION IN EARMARKS SINCE HE HAS BEEN IN THE SENATE………OBAMA IS THE BRIDGE TO NOWHERE.
Posted by: Foodforthought | September 9, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
IN the 3 years 9 months Obama has been a US Senator, he sponsored 427 bills and authored 152 of them. Prior to that, he was in the Illinois State Legislature where he sponsored 820 bills to become law.
Senator Obama’s record: Of the 15 bills he sponsored or co-sponsored in 2005-7 that became law,
*2 addressed foreign policy (promote relief, security, and democracy in the Congo; and develop democratic institutions in areas under Palestinian control)
*3 addressed public health (improve mine safety; increased breast cancer research funding; reduce preterm delivery and complications, reduce infant mortality)
*2 addressed openness and accountability in government (strengthening the Freedom Of Information Act; full disclosure of all entities receiving federal funds)
*2 addressed national security (extend terrorist risk insurance; amend the Patriot Act)
*1 addressed the needs of the Armed Forces (wave passport fees to visit graves, attend memorials/funerals of veterans abroad)
And of the hundreds of bills Senator Obama introduced during the 109th and 110th Congress:
*25 addressed energy efficiency and climate change
*21 addressed health care
*20 addressed public health
*14 addressed consumer protection/labor
*13 addressed the needs of veterans and of active duty personnel and their families
*12 addressed congressional ethics and accountability
*10 addressed foreign policy
*9 addressed voting/election rights
*7 addressed education
*6 addressed relief for victims of Hurricane Katrina
*5 addressed the environment
*4 addressed discrimination
*4 addressed homeland security
Posted by: Amused visitor to America | September 9, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Obama’s record? Since Jan 2005 he has personally sponsored 136 bills, 122 which haven’t even made it out of committee (see GovTrack.org) We already know the number of times he voted present so he wouldn’t have to commit to a vote. There’s not any tactic he won’t engage in including lies and innuendo and there are numerous articles – Obama hid a $832,000 made to ACORN (See Wash Post Article dated 8/22/2008.) – now Obama is making an amendment to FEC over this ‘slip’. He and Biden represent change? He’s voted with his party 98% of the time – is that change:? Is that reaching across to get things done in a bipartisan manner? He says change but he uses the old tax and tax policy which will only further depress teh economy. Sarah Palin did take on the establlished network as did John McCain. Obama says he takes a stance against lobbying? See see Wash POst article dated 8/27/08 -’Obama gave Biden’s son’s client’s 3.4 million .’ JOe Biden’s son is a lobbyist and Obama has sought 3.4 million for client’s of that son. Read the article yourself. Obama says he’s against lobbyists – apparently not! Biden has collected 6.9 million from lobbyists since 1989. Don’t take my word for it – read the article WaPo (Washington Post August 27, 2008.) Apparently Obama’s not as against lobbyists as he likes to say… Obama’s sent 30 lawyers to Anchorage to get dirt on Palin – 30 lawyers – Obama will do anything and I think that’s scary. I know you will rationalize away anything for Obama but does this not bother you? So your guy Obama is the biggest liar of them all. Obama is Change? The only change he preresents is a like a quick change artist.
Posted by: Barbara | September 10, 2008, 6:32 am 6:32 am
It’s becoming quite remarkable how the McCain Palin campaign have been throwing out a lot of stuff to prove just how mavericky she really is and then screaming “foul,” “mean media,” or “sexism,” whenever anyone tries to actually examine the record.
If you put a statement out there, you own it and have to defend it.
Posted by: ErinSiobhan | September 10, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am
Seems to me that the way to stop McCain\Palin demagoguery on earmarks is
to agree with them…..Then go about
listing every single earmark (including those in Alaska) and simply ask whether they were benefial or not to the people received them. And, if they believed they beneficial, how would they otherwise have been funded. The reason earmarks are used so rampantly is that politicians no the projects in the earmark, no matter how beneficial to their constituents, would never pass on its own. Does it reduce spending to cut all earmarks? Yes. Does it benefit the common good? Maybe not.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 10, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
When will Evangelical Christians realise that the right-wing has high-jacked their vote by offering a few token policies that don’t impact their finances (pro-life, anti same-sex marriage), while focusing the rest of their attention on war-mongering, greedy policies that are completly unbiblical??? Surely voting Republican is not in line with Christ’s call of “loving one’s neighbour”.
Posted by: AnessuausMouth | September 10, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Bush-McFailin’ 08
“Because God Wants It That Way!”
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 11, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am