The Pork Wars
In Indiana today, a state known for its pork cutlets, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, attacked the GOP ticket as less than sincere about combatting wasteful pork barrel projects.
"I know the governor of Alaska has been, you know, saying she is change," Obama said of Gov. Sarah Palin. "And that is great. She is a skillful politician.
"But when you’ve been taking all these earmarks when it is convenient and then suddenly you are the champion anti-earmark person, that is not change, come on!" Obama said. "I mean, words mean something. You can’t just make stuff up. You can’t just make stuff up. We have a choice to make and the choice is clear."
Obama was referring quite factually to the fact that despite her self-styled anti-pork image, Palin was quite active in seeking pork in the past.
In two years as governor, Palin sought 83 federal earmarks at a cost of $453 million, according to the Anchorage Daily News. "The federal budget, in its various manifestations, is incredibly important to us, and congressional earmarks are one aspect of this relationship," Palin wrote in a newspaper column, according to the Los Angeles Times.
As the mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired lobbyist Steve Silver, a former aide to Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, to secure earmarks for the town.
In fact, the Los Angeles Times reports today that three times in recent years, McCain himself listed Palin-requested projects for Wasilla as "objectionable" spending.
"While Sen. McCain was going after cutting earmarks in Washington, Gov. Palin was going after getting earmarks," Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense told the Times.
McCain’s 2001 list included Wasilla’s $500,000 earmark for a public transportation project; his 2002 list included Wasilla’s $1 million for what law enforcement called a redundant emergency communications center and a$450,000 agricultural processing facility.
McCain campaign spokesman Taylor Griffin told the LA Times that as mayor, Palin "faced a system that was broken. Small towns like Wasilla in Alaska depended on earmarks to take care of basic needs. . . . That was something that Gov. Palin was alarmed about and was one of the formative experiences that led her toward the reform-oriented stance that she has taken as her career has progressed."
When it comes to pork, Obama, it should be noted, is hardly kosher.
Since joining the Senate in January 2005 he has requested 330 projects totaling $931.3 million, according to his Senate website where he discloses all his requests.
"Barack Obama has requested the equivalent of one million dollars in new pork barrel spending for every working day he’s been in the U.S Senate," said McCain spox Tucker Bounds, "while John McCain has never once asked for an earmark, and Governor Palin has vetoed hundreds of millions in government spending including killing the infamous ‘bridge to nowhere’. Just like so many other issues Barack Obama is all talk, has no record to back it up and isn’t ready to make change."
Palin originally had supported the "Bridge to Nowhere," though she ultimately came to oppose it.
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
It isn’t opposing the bridge to nowhere if you take the funds and use them for something else. OK.
Posted by: TigerLily | September 6, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
She is for pork before she is against it…
Posted by: Kelly | September 6, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Palin was also FOR Obama, before she was AGAINST him.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Six million for a Temple to himself
Throwing 12,000 flags in the trash.
Obama’s reckless spending….
Posted by: harry | September 6, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
I should also be noted that, while taking the amount of earmarks Obama as seems remarkably excessive, Illinois is a big state, with a massive city. Hillary Clinton got a lot of earmarks too, but when you’re working with $$ in New York City, its a different ballgame. $27 mil goes a lot farther in Wasilla than it does in Chicago (or New York). But more importantly, Obama isn’t campaigning as an anti-pork crusader. McCain/Palin is. Obama released his earmarks during the primary (I think he was the first of the major candidates to do so–McCain doesn’t have any, I believe). He isn’t ashamed of the earmarks he secured, he clearly thinks they are necessary. If Palin really does believe she was working in a broken system (and, ya know, she was), she should say that. But just saying that you’ve always been an antiearmark crusader who always opposed the bridge to nowhere is disingenuous.
Posted by: Kim | September 6, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
uh, tucker.. how exactly did she “kill” the earmark for the bridge? it was a dead project before she became governor. she didnt even have the opportunity to kill it.
Posted by: LOL | September 6, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Alaska has a population of 670,000.
Illinois has a population of 12,832,000.
Palin approx. $667/person
Obama approx. $75/person
Posted by: brian in nc | September 6, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Palin originally had supported the “Bridge to Nowhere,” though she ultimately came to oppose it.
- jpt
———————–
She also kept the money for the project.
Posted by: Lance D. | September 6, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Obama spent millions in earmarks to help his wife and buddies like Father Pfleger in Chicago.
McCain has no earmarks.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 6, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
I am another military member for Obama/Biden.
This country deserves better than what the republican liars are trying to give us.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
The republicans have the nerve to give us a Vice Presidential nominee that has limited education, and no foreign policy experience. Zilch, Nada, None.
Living near Russia doesn’t count as foreign policy.
The republicans NOW claim they’ll create millions of new jobs. To replace the millions we have lost under the same administration?
And if you believe that, they have a bridge to Nowhere they’re trying to sell you on e-bay.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
If Obama lies about this what else is he lying about? Makes me wonder how trustworthy he really is. Hmm.
Posted by: Sarah | September 6, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
THANK YOU JAKE!
None of the TV media talking heads seems to be willing to point out the complete HYPOCRACY that is Gov Palin.
They all just raved about how she could read a speech (filled with flat out lies and false hoods) that was prepared by the BUSH speech writers …. That’s change?
Palin is another GOP puppet and a clone of what we have had for eight years. Johnny Maverick has old his soul to get elected. He has gone aganst many things he stood for just a couple years ago. If he will not stand up to himself, how will he stand up to his buddies in Washington?
Should Mr “I’ll veto wasteful earmarks and let you know the names of the people who propose them” get elected, the first name on the list should be Gov Pain!
Posted by: FACT CHECKS HURT THE GOP | September 6, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Folks, check your facts about the dollars. The federals government earns 3 times more from Alaska than Alaska gets back if one forgets about all the large militay installations in the state. Billions from natural resources on federal land are sold.
Obama has already proved he is the big spender with just the way he has run his campaign.
Posted by: Martin | September 6, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Is Obama running against Palin or McCain? Can’t tell anymore. He seems more concerned about comparing his experience and record to hers. Kind of shows that maybe Obama should be the vice president candidate. McCain08 / Hillary 12
Posted by: GEW | September 6, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Sarah,
Did you read the above article….it’s about PALIN lying, not Obama.
Ask yourself what else SHE is lying about.
Hmmmmmmmmmmm?
“While Sen. McCain was going after cutting earmarks in Washington, Gov. Palin was going after getting earmarks,”
Posted by: McCain is McSame | September 6, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Sorry to seem naive here, but why are earmarks so bad? I mean some earmarks support worthwhile and important projects don’t they? I think its quite dangerous to posture that you are against all earmarks.
Posted by: markymark | September 6, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Why did Obama spit in the face of all Americans and leave those flags in the trash at his convention? I want a leader not a big spender!
Posted by: Brad | September 6, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
No Martin, you have that confused.
Senator Obama has proven that his community organizing skills have provided him with the best grassroots organization that beat the most powerful political machine in history.
His money comes from people like me. We want him to win this election, and the American people are depending on him to win this election. We’re tired of this Karl Rove government.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Jackie: Decades ago Palin was a teenager. She was mayor two years ago. She has only been a governor for 20 months. When Obama was a community organizer she was a sports broadcaster. Please republicans, facts?
Posted by: brian in nc | September 6, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
“Obama has spent $100 million dollars every day that he was in the senate”. Who’s lying?
Posted by: Sarah | September 6, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
So when does the McCain campaign whine about Obama attacking Palin’s family?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Jackie, she requested earmarks decades ago? Palin was in the government decades ago? She was mayor just two yrs ago, now a Governor for the last year and a half.
Is it true when Palin took over as mayor she had $0 debt, but left them with $22 million in debt?
This pitbull hockeymom, with or without lipstick, does not have the knowledge or education to be #2. I’m sure the folks in Alask are still trying to figure out why she’s their Governor.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Obama continues to show poor judgement and leadership. If by his lack of oversight millions of flags get left for the trash how much waste are we to expect when he is in charge of the government? If a person doesn’t have a history of getting things done properly why would you think anything will be different in the future?
Posted by: Brad | September 6, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
“Sorry to seem naive here, but why are earmarks so bad”
Earmarks are considered bad because they are slipped into totally unrelated bills to fund projects in local state districts. Many times they are done to favor of the politician wanting the earmark in support of the larger bill. The problem with earmarks is that they are inherently clandestine. In truth, these earmarks would never see the light of day otherwise and local communities would see no federal money. McCain\Palin demagogue against this practice. Bottom line, is if the earmark is for your district or City (Wasilla) your constituancy is happy since it creates jobs and betters the community and results in support for your re-election.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 6, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Well, if the Governor to my state was not trying to get as much Federal money as possible, that Governor would be looking for a new job.
After all working for your state IS the job of a governor, unless Obama is trying to mock the work of governors (as he has never been a governor).
The important point is that Sarah Palin has not had one vote on whether any federal money was allocated for Alaska.
Barack Obama and Joe Biden have both had votes on a lot of government, pork barrel spending.
With Obama’s record of requesting the equivalent of $1 million in pork barrel spending for every day served in the Senate over four years (of course, that’s not yet a full term), a clear picture of the pork barrel politician from Chicago should emerge.
Change?
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
The purpose of the bridge in Ketchikan was to provide access to the airport on the thinly-populated Gravina Island. It would have opened the area to expansion, too.
Alaska’s congressional delegation earmarked 223 million dollars for the project, and an equal amount for a crossing of Knik Arm at Anchorage, and was heavily criticized for it.
Ultimately, Congress rescinded the earmark. The money still went to Alaska; Congress let Alaska keep the money, to use it for other, transportation purposes. It was then up to then-Governor Murkowski to decide whether to spend the money on the bridges, or on something else.
In September, ’06. Sarah Palin campaigned for governor in Ketchikan. She said that the bridge is necessary for town prosperity.
One year later, as the projected cost for the Ketchikan Bridge balooned to almost 400 million dollars, Murkowski Administration officials were saying that the Bridge project was looking less likely. Candidate Palin said that she was then focusing on less-expensive alternatives.
So much for mee flip-flopping.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
So much for mee flip-flopping>>>So much for the flip-flopping.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Factchecker, you mean when McCain was graduating at the bottom of his class? Obama was in school, getting an education.
He graduated from Columbia Univ with a political science degree, with a minor in foreign relations.
He then received his law degree from Harvard.
He also taught Constitutional Law at the Univ of Chicago.
Palin’s degree in journalism with a minor in sportscasting, doesn’t even allow her to teach a class in this country. But you delusional republicans somehow want to put her in charge of the country.
Not. This. Time.
We’ve had enough of Karl Rove running our country into the ground.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
The McCain campaign is bringing two Bush administration communication veterans on board to beef up the team that will travel with Palin.
Tucker Eskew has joined the Palin team as a senior advisor, and campaign officials said he will play a role akin to chief of staff. Eskew served as director of the White House Office of Global Communications and as director of media affairs.
The campaign also confirmed Friday that Tracey Schmitt is joining as deputy communications director and national spokesperson. She is a former Republican National Committee spokesperson.
THIS IS LIKE PUTTING A DRESS & LIPSTICK ON BUSH
Posted by: i knew it was coming | September 6, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
And, indy voter, you are not naive.
When it comes to the performance of state officials, those doing their job try to get as much of the “ear mark” money as possible before it goes to someplace like…Chicago…
But, according to Obama, trying to get federal funding for projects in your state is something that a governor should not do.
Such statements and attitude only show that Obama is about as experienced in state government as he is in federal government.
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
“Well, if the Governor to my state was not trying to get as much Federal money as possible, that Governor would be looking for a new job.”
Fine. But don’t mis-represent your role in trying to obtain that money and don’t demagogue against Washington providing that money. You can’t have it both ways.
Posted by: indy_voter | September 6, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Right Jayhawk. It’s funny how McCain/Palin are trying to co-opt the change mantra from Obama/Biden.
They STILL have no original ideas of their own to work with. Palin brings investigation out the starting gate.
She doesn’t have the knowledge, the education, nor the experience.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
So far all of the attacks coming from the Obama camp, seems to be the crying wolf game. Careful at pointing fingers there BO, you look pretty desperate and petty to this Independent/REAL DEMOCRAT NOT VOTING FOR BO>
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
==don’t mis-represent your role in trying to obtain that money and don’t demagogue against Washington providing that money. You can’t have it both ways.==
Palin wasn’t governor when Alaska took the money that Congress agreed to send the money that it said was to be used, not necessarily for the bridge, rather for transportation purposes.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Obama CHANGED the DEM Party for the worse. Now it’s just a sexist NOT Democratic Party. We will Never Forget the CHEATING at the CAUCUSES. NEVER!
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Obama is not against earmarks.
What he has sought is transparency so that Americans know what earmarks are declared and they can make their own decisions about the relative worth.
He and Sen Coburn have pushed additional measures for their trasnparency law that make a database available to the public.
Obama disclosed every one of his earmarks during the primary campaign.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Will ABC report on the 12,000 American flags (mere politcal props) Obama and his people threw in the trash in Denver”?
Thankfully some boy scouts recused them. Clearly Obama had no use for them as his “O” flag would replace our flag along with his seal and probably Ludacris penned National anthem.
Posted by: geevill | September 6, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Original?
Obama?
Just about everything in the Obama campaign has been stolen from Axelrod to flip-flops.
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Wow. Brilliant strategy. Obama people trying to portray Palin as the Washington insider spending our tax dollars.
Posted by: geevill | September 6, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
==Wow. Brilliant strategy. Obama people trying to portray Palin as the Washington insider spending our tax dollars.==
It’s real entertainment, isn’t it.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
There’s nothing done that is illegal in the earmarks. In reading the las part of story, Obama’s nose isn’t too clean either. Just as all the LOOPHOLES in fundraising while catering to special interest where BO made the most. Why are all the special interests who are “not” lobbyists contributing so much to Obama? What do they expect?
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Of course there is nothing illegal about earmarks.
The problem is Palin’s blatant LIE about her position on earmarks.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
IOW she kept the earmark.==
congress said that Alaska could keep it for other transportation purposes. That came under Murkowski, not Palin who changed her view of the bridge when the cost for it ballooned to over 400 million dollars which is 200 million above the earmark.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
You make some good points, indy voter, many of which I agree with.
But the conclusion is wrong.
I was a Democrat for 34 years…until this year.
Now, I am “independent.”
We have the choice in this election between bad and worse.
My position is that Obama/Biden even goes beyond worse to worst.
As such, I will probably not cast my vote for either major party’s candidates and will support a 3rd party candidate (not sure which).
As it has since its inception, my state will be a “Red” state, so my vote is pretty much a moot point.
Such was my choice in the last election.
And, my choice in this election is…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
bc46,
If Palin and McCain want to change Washington they can start by encouraging voters to throw out all the incumbents. I am from North Carolina and would certainly support his advocating to throw out Elizabeth Dole, who like McCain, voted with Bush 90% of the time. She has been in Washington many years. But I suspect McCain and Palin will say they value her leadership (though she’s done nothing) and argue she is not part of the problem (i.e, she is a Republican). McCain and Palin are not reformers. They are partisans. McCain = Bush (meet the new boss, same as the old boss)…
Posted by: indy_voter | September 6, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Just as the loopholes in LOBBYISTS raising money for his campaign. He CLAIMS he is against special interest, yet he has made the most money from them. Obama TOO is a LIAR. THE DIRTY POLITICIAN…..
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
RIGHT ON JAYHAWK; FIGHT THE POWER!!!
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
And when Congress gave that authority for the money to be used elsewhere that signaled the death knell of the bridge. All Palin did was call the official time of death.
The money then was used for the road to nowhere.
That’s not “thanks but no thanks” and her stated position on the bridge to nowhere is disengenuous.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
==The problem is Palin’s blatant LIE about her position on earmarks. ==
She didn’t lie. She supported the bridge to the airport. When the cost of the bridge balloned to over $400 million, double the earmark, she thought the $233 million could be used elsewhere, for transportation purposes. When Congress removed the earmark, it still sent the money to Alaska to be used for other, transportation purposes. All this occurred in the Murkowski era.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
One thing I have to admit about Obama: He is a smooth talker…not much more than that…but he IS a smooth talker.
Anyone who can rail against taking pork barrel money from Washington and have a record of requesting the equivalent of $1,000,000.00 a day for every day for about 4 years…
That’s a lot of pork…
A lot more than Sarah Palin got for Alaska…
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Sarah Palin is the QUEEN OF PORK.
Not only was the first thing she did as mayor of tiny Wasilla (population 7000!!!)to hire a federal LOBBYIST.
Not only did she rack up $27 MILLION in FEDERAL PORK projects.
But she SUPPORTED the ‘bridge to nowhere’ when she ran for governor. Got that? She supported the bridge. She supported the earmark. She supported a lobbyist.
And she visited the town the bridge to nowhere was to be built and told the residents there it was INSULTING to even use the phrase.
When she made her first appearance with John McCain what did she say? That she was against it. That was a lie.
When John McCain introduced her as his VP pick, what did she say? That she sold the governor’s jet on Ebay. That was a lie.
And as Governor, she asked for and received $450 MILLION in Federal Pork, for one of the smallest (by population!) states in the Union. It’s not like Alaska can’t afford to build their own bridges! They send a welfare check (derived from oil production taxes) of $1700 per man, woman and child EVERY YEAR for God’s sake!
Sarah Palin is the Queen of Pork. But John McCain is the King of Hypocrites.
Posted by: John's conscience | September 6, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Earmarks/Lobbyists…..equivalent lies…While Obama points his finger all the rest point back at him. The man who “Changed” the Democratic Party into the sexist, undemocratic party.
Obama: EGO BEFORE PARTY!
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
Except Obama hasn’t railed against pork barrel spending.
He is for transparency, which is why he disclosed all his earmarks early this primary season and is continuing to work with Sen. Coburn to make the reporting and access to information easier for all of us.
Palin is the one who posits herself as against pork barrel spedning and that is a lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
And I agree with you 100% indy voter. But I could swallow Dole, with all her knowledge and experience, if I had to. Not Palin. I will say, and KEEP SAYING, she doesn’t have the knowledge, the education, nor the experience to run this country. Her journalism degree doesn’t even allow her to teach a class in this country, let alone be Vice President.
They are trying to bring her up to speed on foreign policy and national security. They say she’s a quick study. All these other guys have been at it for years, but now she can have it all because she’s a quick study?
Remember how important foreign policy has been for the last 18 months. Remember how they raked Obama over the coals regarding his experience, but NOW foreign policy is not important? That is scary for this country.
I’m tired of this country electing officials based on nothing but lies.
McCain is now talking about transparency in government. That which Senator Obama has advocated for, for the last two years. Every policy he has proposed, this administration has adopted. I would rather have the brilliant guy than the one who graduated at the bottom of his class.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
==And when Congress gave that authority for the money to be used elsewhere that signaled the death knell of the bridge. All Palin did was call the official time of death.==
Except that, in addition, she said that the money could be used for other transportation purposes, agreeing with Congress.
In any case, all this occurred during the Murkowski era. He was the governor. She wasn’t.
==The money then was used for the road to nowhere.==
Actually, they’re working on that road right now, our road to the airport on the island.
==… her stated position on the bridge to nowhere is disengenuous.==
Except it was not. She changed her position during the Murkowski era. He was the governor.
First she supported the bridge. Congress agreed with her.
Then, Congress removed the earmark. However, it still sent the money to Alaska. It said that the money should be used for transportation purposes.
The cost for the bridge balloned to over $400 million. That is double the earmark.
Seeing this, Palin decided that the money could be used better for other transportation purposes, agreeing with Congress. Today, the money is being used for other, transportation purposes, a road to the airport.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Obama says he wouldn’t waste our money if he were president but he just threw out 12,000 brand new flags. It’s gone from words just words to things just things.
Posted by: Greg | September 6, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Concerned in OH “Interesting contrast.”
Yes, it says a great deal about your wildly partisan spin.
Do you have anything to say about the unflattering *facts* presented about VP Palin’s record not matching her rhetoric or marketing?
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
CONFUSED IN OH
you should be more concerned with the double talk your candidates are making
mccain was already the reigning champion of flipflops this year. Looks like Palin is in contention.
Who will win? the competition is fierce
Posted by: Omentum | September 6, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
I knew the stage props at Obama’s convention were fake now I realize his patriotism was too. That’s what happens when you speak at the temple of doom.
Posted by: LarryT | September 6, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Concerned in OH, Senator Obama was not part of the cleanup crew in Denver.
I know you probably think he should be, but he wasn’t, so stop blaming him for the flag fiasco. They were probably made in Taiwan anyway, who cares?!
Oh, maybe we could give them to China to relieve some of our debt with them? Run that past Palin, I’m sure she’ll think it might work. She could write to them to ask.
Posted by: bc46 | September 6, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Jayhawk,
I am an Independent not a Democrat. I have been voting since the Nixon years….voting for him twice. I voted for Reagan once until I realized the Reagan revolution was a sham and went totally amok under Bush elder. That was about the time the religious right took a stranglehold on the party. The reason I am an Independent is while I like many of many of the Democratic principles (and hate what the Republican party has become) there are still things that they simply do not quite get. The Clinton impeachment for example. Too many Democrats blame Republicans for that rather than Bill. I believe that was one of the reasons for some of the more fervent support for Hillary..to get at Republicans. I could not support Hillary for that reason and was one of these anybody but Hillary people. The thing is though…I want to retain my Independent status so that I can with a clear concience vote for who I want. I could never understand people who joined a political party because they believe in the ideals and platform of that party voting for the opposite party. It makes no sense to me. I will be voting for Obama for the simplest of reasons….I hate what the Republican party has become and it is Republican policies that have driven this country backward. If you, as a Democrat cannot support Obama, fine…I just wanted to let you know where I am coming from….
Posted by: indy_voter | September 6, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
John:
Doesn’t Old Joe Biden represent a state with the same amount of electoral votes (hence, similar in population) as Alaska.
One should then ask the question of how much pork barrel money Old Joe Biden has secured for his state, Delaware, over his 36 year tenure of change in the U.S. Senate.
And, now, an investigation is getting underway as to how the Biden estate/mansion was financed.
Perhaps with a little pork?
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
jayhawk: “One should then ask the question of how much pork barrel money Old Joe Biden has secured for his state, Delaware, over his 36 year tenure of change in the U.S. Senate.”
Why, has Joe made it a key point of his campaign to fight pork? I must have missed that – could you cite it? To my recollection, Palin is the one who has been vigorously campaigning as being against pork, even lying by saying she was against the infamous “Bridge to Nowhere” when in fact she is on record supporting it.
Pork is not illegal, and it’s not even all bad (with the pathetic infrastructure support in the normal budget process, many an interstate bridge is still standing thanks to a bit of ‘pork’). This is a commendation of Palin lying about her actual record.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Palin’s whole platform is as a “reformer” and hater of earmarks, which has proven to be utterly false.
Obama’s record on pork is irrelevant. His campaign platform has not been about pork. Besides any citizen who says they are against pork is a liar. Why, because your state benefits from all the pork your reps can get for you. You reap the rewards of it. What you are against is any other state/community getting pork.
Posted by: MOOSE CALLING THE KETTLE A PIG | September 6, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
When Palin says “I told Congress, ‘Thanks, but no thanks,’ on that bridge to nowhere,” it implies Congress said, “Here’s a check for that bridge” and she responded, “No thanks, that’s wasteful spending; here’s your money back.”
That’s not what happened. Fact is, Alaska took the bridge money, and then just spent it on other projects. Palin did make the final call to kill plans for the bridge, but by the time she did it was no longer a politically viable project. We rule Palin’s claim is Half True.
- Polifact
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Jay,
If you want to criticize Biden, you will need facts. The importance of Queen Sarah’s crown is how she LIED on her first public appearance as the VP pick. Maybe her ride is the ‘crooked talk limo’!
Posted by: John's conscience | September 6, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
453+ mill for the GOVERNOR of the state of ALASKA. 931mil+ for the Senator of ILL. Okay, so he didn’t say anything against PORK BARRELING. GEEEEEEE. I wonder WHY???Anyone????
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
==When Palin says “I told Congress, ‘Thanks, but no thanks,’ on that bridge to nowhere,” it implies Congress said, “Here’s a check for that bridge” and she responded, “No thanks, that’s wasteful spending; here’s your money back.”
That’s not what happened.==
Palin was not governor at the time. Murkowski was.
Congress earmarked the money — $233 million for the bridge. Congress removed that earmarked.
However, Congress sent the money to Alaska any way and told them that they could use the money for other, transportation purposes. They are doing that now.
Palin was for the bridge when the earmark would have paid for it.
However, the cost for the bridge inflated to near, or over, $400 million. Then, she said that the money could be used better for other, transportation purposes. The money is being used today for other transportation services — that is, a road on the island to the airport.
== New paragraph Fact is, Alaska took the bridge money, and then just spent it on other projects.==
Not exactly true.
When Congress sent that money, after removing the earmark, it told Governor Murkowski that he could spend the money on other, transportation projects. That is what’s happening now.
== Palin did make the final call to kill plans for the bridge, but by the time she did it was no longer a politically viable project. We rule Palin’s claim is Half True.==
You rule wrongly.
She didn’t make any call to kill any bridge. Governor Murkowski, during whose era all this occurred, and other Republican officials of Alaska said at the time that the bridge probably would not be built, given its cost. That’s when Palin changed her mind, saying that the money from Congress could best be used on other, transportation projects.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Obamabots:
You are missing the point.
The difference is between securing funds at the state level or voting for them at the federal level.
The money is going somewhere and it might as well be to your state.
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
OBAMA IS A MAJOR PORK spender. How noble of him to NOT speak against himself.
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Palin isn’t an ideal; there’s no such ones in life. But couldn’t somebody give a whole picture of all the NUMBERS through her career?
Posted by: Julian | September 6, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
well let’s play then
Pork cessation is not the center piece of Obama’s campaign is it.
McCain usually resort to using the “Pork Line (I’m gonna makem famous blabla)” to wake his crowds up when they have drifted off during his boring stump speeches.
Posted by: Omentum | September 6, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED —
Obama’s platform is not about pork. He NEVER said he didn’t take pork for his state. NEVER.
PALIN’S platform is anti-pork, SHE IS THE PORK QUEEN. She has claimed she has NEVER taken pork.
WHO IS THE LIAR?????
CAN YOU SAY HYPOCRITE!!!!
Posted by: HYPOCRITES | September 6, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
McCain ain’t lying. He does call out people who abuse pork.
WHEN PALIN WAS MAYOR OF WASILLA, JOHN MCCAIN CALLED HER OUT ON HER EARMARKS. SHE WAS IN HIS PORK HALL OF SHAME THAT YEAR.
Posted by: HALL OF SHAME | September 6, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
He said he would make them famous
I never though he meant by making them the vice president.
The maverick strikes again.
Posted by: Omentum | September 6, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
“McCain ain’t lying. He does call out people who abuse pork.
WHEN PALIN WAS MAYOR OF WASILLA, JOHN MCCAIN CALLED HER OUT ON HER EARMARKS. SHE WAS IN HIS PORK HALL OF SHAME THAT YEAR.”
Hilarious.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Obama is anti special interest, yet the special interests all show up to raise money eating out of SPOONS because forks and sit downs are not allowed at the loophole fundraising. So I guess I am suppose to believe that at these fund raisers where mega bucks are being spent to wine and dine the special interests Obama is against, only contribute 200 each. Uh HUH. Yeah. WHATEVER……
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
Jayhawk,
I actually think the Obama years will look more like the Clinton years than the Carter years. I know one thing…Republicans really don’t have a clue. And, as the son of a truck driver and factory worker who has done well but worries about where my children will prosper….Republicans offer nothing and absolutely no support (except crocodile tears) for the squeeze are feeling right now…So, I will take my chances with Obama. Good luck to you…
Posted by: indy_voter | September 6, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
“He said he would make them famous
I never though he meant by making them the vice president.
The maverick strikes again.”
Excellent Omentum!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
jhw:
Partial answers don’t count.
And, you didn’t answer the question.
How much pork barrel money has Joe Biden secured for Delaware over his 36 years in the Senate?
Not just for 2008.
While you’re at it, why not include the figures for the pork that Old Joe Biden has secured for interests outside of Delaware?
And, once again, not just for 2008.
While it may not quite stand of to the equivalent of $1,000,000.00 requests for each day in the Senate that Obama has, the figure should be significant.
But, Old Joe Biden is also going to have to answer some significant real estate financing questions that will probably point to some pork that went somewhere other than Delaware.
Seems Old Joe refused to answer any questions when asked.
Hmmmmmm…..
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Palin has lied and continues to lie. She has taken many, many earmarks for her state. In fact Alaska per capita gets more earmarks than any other state. Frankly, what is wrong with this? Most earmarks go to projects that are worthy.
The problem isn’t the pork, it’s the LYING about it. It’s centering your entire platform on a LIE. She has things to offer that don’t revolve around this. They should have focused on her strengths, not her weaknesses.
Frankly it is a campaign strategy that will fail because she wasn’t thoroughly vetted.
Posted by: FAILED STRATEGY | September 6, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Obama, on the Obama Bunch Show:
PALIN, PALIN, PALIN…..
Posted by: Yourgameletsplay | September 6, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
The other day Senator Obama was bragging about managing his campaign, its people and the millions and millions in costs. He said it proved he had executive experience. That is a lie, he has hired people to run his campaign and do the dirty work. Guess a bunch of ‘stupids’ were hired for the clean-up of the convention. It shows how un-American the Obama people really are. OBAMA FOR OBAMA
Posted by: Mary | September 6, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Your koolaid argument no longer works. When you embrace, adore and worship someone you heard about SEVEN days ago, your credibility is pretty much gone.
Your koolaid is getting warm.
Posted by: HEY KOOL AID | September 6, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Thank you, Indy voter,
For my part, I place equal blame on a Republican administration and a Democrat Congress, but we all come to decisions in different ways.
At least there are still some of us who can respectfully agree to disagree.
And, good luck to you and yours.
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
50% of Obama donations are for $200 or less.
He has well over 2 million donors.
By comparison only 25% of McCain’s donations are $200 or less, he has the highest percentage of people giving the max donation.
The people are funding Obam’s campaign.
McCain is raking in shady money from people like Sargeant. He’s already had to return $7,500,000 already. Why does McCain get so much dirty money?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
There’s nothing wrong with earmarks if their intent is to provide a specific service for one’s state or country.
There is something flagrantly dishonest and distasteful in the initiating an earmark for the sole purpose of eventually getting a piece of the pork for yourself.. or your family.
That’s the difference between Palin and Obama.
The money gotten by Palin… benefitted her constituents with no kick backs for her.
At least some of the monies gotten by Obama… benefitted HIM!
For instance, over a million dollars was given to Michelle’s employer and was kick-backed to the Obama’s in the form of a triple digit wage hike.
Fifteen million was generated for Obama’s erstwhile church. $10,000,000 apparently was applied to Jeremiah’s retirement “pay-off”, and it is not beyond possibility that his multi-million dollar mini-retirement mansion also came from these funds.
But it must be admitted that Obama learned from the Papa of Pork Bellies, Emil Jones…. so perhaps he’s not o blame!
Posted by: america*centric | September 6, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
“Your koolaid argument no longer works. When you embrace, adore and worship someone you heard about SEVEN days ago, your credibility is pretty much gone.”
Wow…absolutely devastating!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Pork is good. Pork is why we elect our representatives. We want pork and we want it in our districts. We re-elect our reps based on their success at hauling in as much pork as they can.
McCain is indeed against the other white meat, which is fine, it has helped him win a lot of elections (while partaking of his own fair share of pork for Arizona, which they need, cuz their roads stink).
My point is they should not have made Pork an issue when Palin has partaken of the pig to the point of bloat.
It was a stupid strategy and should be dropped from her stump speeches. Run her on her strengths, not her weakness.
Posted by: UH, DUH | September 6, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
The dems DID NOT throw away flags after the DNC. This was a lie spread by Karl Rovians.
McCain stooping to such dirty politics and outright lies is really quite pathetic. He no longer has any honor.
Posted by: FLAG LIE | September 6, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Concerned in OH: “Yet he keeps asking for a source.”
And the source is not actually Abcnews, but Senator Obama’s own website, where he discloses all his earmarks. What does that say about his transparancy versus Governor Palins?
I’m dying to hear how much earmark money Alaska, 1/18 the population of IL, sucked up in the same time period. If that data is even available.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Palin is a habitual liar.
Obama has never made a case that he said thanks but no thanks to earmarks. He never made this a campaign issue.
Palin did. Lied on national tv how she said thanks but no thanks to earmarks. Not only did she request earmarks for wasteful projects in Wasilla like a park and sports arena, but the Bridge to Nowhere was her baby. And she is still requesting money from the lower 48′s pockets for other wasteful projects like the Road to nowhere, and a project to have a train leading from Wasila to Senator Stevens home area.
A Liar. Can’t be trusted
Posted by: thanks but no thanks | September 6, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Judging by the neo-con posts today, I think the republicans have stupid locked. In 2004 the big question was “How could 100 million people be so stupid”, well they still are.
Posted by: Sarah | September 6, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
“Obama says he wouldn’t waste our money if he were president but he just threw out 12,000 brand new flags. It’s gone from words just words to things just things.
Posted by: Greg | Sep 6, 2008 4:25:27 PM
____________
Obama doesn’t know the word “DONATE”… unless whatever’s being “donated” is for him!
He could have sent those flags to Chicago to be distributed to tghe city’s public schools.
instead, he chose to literally “trash”
12,000 American flags.
And don’t tell me there’s a “dignified” way to “trash” the symbol of our country, other than by fire!
Posted by: america*centric | September 6, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Concerned in Ohio–
Do you think the fact that you repeat a lie over and over again makes it true?
I guess I understand why you support Palin, two liars in a pod.
The flags for the DNC were not thrown in the garbage. They were disposed of appropriately.
YOU ARE A SPREADER OF LIES BECAUSE YOUR CANDIDATES CANNOT WIN ON THE ISSUES.
Posted by: PATHETIC REPUBS | September 6, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
Yes Palin is a lier as we can see, we see how easy it is for her to lie. Should she become VP, she would be just another Republican like, Bush and McCain. Change with her I do not think so.
Posted by: Bev | September 6, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Country First: “JHW: as a veteran of Vietnam, and someone that is proud of my country and its flag. there is a proper way to dispose of the flag… maybe you democrats adn dailykos kiddies think the flag is unimportant. this is why you are called America haters……”
There is being proud of the flag and there is worshiping it as an icon. Throwing away a flag when it is not longer fit for use is an accepted manner of disposal, provided it is done respectfully. I am an American and I support it’s ideals, values and people. But I worship God, and Jesus Christ his son – not a piece of cloth. See the subtle difference there?
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
==Palin has lied and continues to lie.==
Actually, she hasn’t. However, that won’t stop you from saying that she has. That’s why McCain/Palin will win.
== She has taken many, many earmarks for her state.==
That’s her job, to get money for the people she represents.
== In fact Alaska per capita gets more earmarks than any other state.==
You’re jealous of her success.
==Frankly, what is wrong with this?==
If somebody hands me money, who am I to question it?
== Most earmarks go to projects that are worthy. ==
The individual state gets to make the call.
==The problem isn’t the pork, it’s the LYING about it. It’s centering your entire platform on a LIE.==
She didn’t lie.
==Frankly it is a campaign strategy that will fail because she wasn’t thoroughly vetted==
However, she was, to the satisfaction of McCain and others.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
“Barack Obama has requested the equivalent of one million dollars in new pork barrel spending for every working day he’s been in the U.S Senate,”
Well I’d say that about covers it.
Posted by: GOPmom | September 6, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Why has McCain had to return so much money? Over $7,500,000 so far as of July.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
looks like we have maverick Obama bloggers trying to attack Palin without a script. Governor Palin can not spend federal tax dollars unless they are appropriated by Congress. Not Bush, Not Palin -the Democratic controlled Congress. That means Pelosi, Obama and Biden
Posted by: geevill | September 6, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
–bc46– Obama has been and is still a member of the Chicago Machine, the most powerful and corrupt political machine in history. That is where he has received his political education.
Posted by: Martin | September 6, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
I do not think there is anything wrong with using tax paying dollars to help projects and people in other states.
As Americans, it is our jobs to support one another.
I am against using my money for do nothing projects that really doesn’t do much to help the constituents that need it the most/
BUT I AM APPALLED, and disappointed, that this WOMAN, this Hypocrit, this fire breathing liar,
would get on NATIONAL TV and lie to the AMERICAN public about this.
IT IS the lie that is causing the stir and the fury.
What good are you when one cannot depend on your WORD?
A lie is a lie is a lie. No spinning necessary.
Posted by: can't be trusted | September 6, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Concerned lied again.
Though the earmark was requested. The funding did not make it to the budget that was approved.
That you know of the request is because Obama believes in transparency.
If concerned has proof that Michelle’s hospital received that money, he should present it.
If not, its just another lie by concerned busted. Shal we throw it on the pile?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Geevil-
Correct, the congress approves earmarks. The Mayor/Governor REQUESTS these earmarks, or in Palin’s case hires Jack Abramoff’s lobbyist to do it for her. Jack just got sent away for 4 years in prison by the way.
I am unsure of your point based on the fact that Gov. Palin clearly lied about requesting and utilizing as many earmarks as she could get her greedy little hands on.
Posted by: G-Evil | September 6, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Governor Palin can not spend federal tax dollars unless they are appropriated by Congress”
Sheparded through by senior Senators Ted Stevens and Don Young.
You remeber Ted Stevens who was a big factor in bringing Palin into the warm fold of the Republican party machine.
That was before he was indicted on some very serious charges. Even now Palin hasn’t decided whether to endorse him or not. Old friends and all that.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
jayhawk: “Partial answers don’t count.
And, you didn’t answer the question.
How much pork barrel money has Joe Biden secured for Delaware over his 36 years in the Senate?”
I am not your clerk, look it up myself. I supplied information for 2008 that shows, with publicly available, verifiable facts, that Governor Palin sucked a massively larger amount of pork than Senator Biden. Now it is your turn to provide something other than vague, wholly unsubstantiated innuendo and slander, if your mudslinging has any support at all. You’re the one in the position of having advanced an argument that now looks to be irrelevant (actually a rather damning indictment of Govenor Palin as another politics-as-usual blowhard) in the face of the facts.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
==Why would I be jealous of her success.==
It revolves around your allergy to McCain/Palin.
== You don’t know who I am or what level of success I have achieved in my own life. ==
Irrelevant to what I was saying.
==I don’t know anything about Palin, because she won’t talk to the media, so I am unable to determine what her accomplishments might be.==
There is information every were about her accomplishments.
== I would love to hear her explain the discrepancies in her statements.==
You mean what you PERCEIVE as discrepancies.
== But until now, all I know is that she has either flat out lied or embellished the truth. ==
That’s what the Lib websites are telling you.
==Unless you are insinuating I am jealous of her looks, which would be odd and frankly sexist.==
As a man, I am naturally sexist. I notice the difference between men and women, and I like that difference, and I take advantage of that difference.
== Are you voting for her based on her looks?==
No, but I notice her good looks. It’s just part of the package. It’s not part of the package on which I base my vote; but I am more politically and socially attracted to what somebody says if what is pleasant about them includes looks.
== How pathetic. ==
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Mr. Incredible –
Your Oprah comment says everything I need to know about you.
Every news organization, including the biased AP, has used FactCheck and indeed Mayor Palin hired a lobbyist and received millions of dollars in earmarks. She misrepresented her position on the bridge to nowhere in her own speech. She did not say “Thanks but no thanks” She said Thanks but when their was not enough money to proceed and it had become politically unpopular THEN she said No thanks to the bridge. Of course the road to that bridge is currently under construction.
So I guess she didn’t lie, she just forgot to put a long pause in between the thanks and the no thanks.
McCain is running as an anti-earmark maverick when his own running mate has used earmarks as evidenced by her own state budget, which is public information.
In fact, when she was Mayor of Wasilla, John McCain called her out on her use of pork. Los Angeles Times 9-3-08 edition, front page.
Posted by: PORKY PALIN | September 6, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
As a U.S. Senator, Barack Obama sought more than $3.4 million in congressional earmarks for clients of the lobbyist son of his Democratic running mate, Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware.
Records show, according to the Washington Post, Obama succeeded in getting $192,000 for one of the clients, St. Xavier University in suburban Chicago.
Yet, Obama’s campaign purports a hard stance against the world of lobbying in the nation’s capital.
An analysis (for The Washington Post by Taxpayers for Common Sense) of Hunter Biden’s firm’s lobbying business found that its clients collected $2.7 million in earmarks in the last fiscal year.
And, Obama has the nerve to question earmarks and pork in other candidates?
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
concerned in OH: “I think a better measure of pork barrel spending is who the recipients are. I would say the total number of residents in Alaska is greater than the total number of wives Obama has, or sons Biden has.”
Without any facts to support your false attacks and hollow talking points, you are now going straight for personal slander. What a useless debate.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
“Late in the Iowa Caucus campaign, Obama criticized John Edwards for serving the same “Washington special interests” that Edwards claimed to oppose because Edwards received support from independent labor-based groups (“527s”) affiliated with the Service Employees International Union (SEIU). Obama knew very well (a) that Edwards had spoken against large corporate interests, not labor and (b) that capital, not labor, exercises dominant influence over the federal government. He also turned around and started taking money from the same exact groups prior to the Nevada Caucus. It was all very disingenuous, to say the least. “
Posted by: Samantha | September 6, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
So what if public officials request money for their constituents?
If you need the money for a worthwhile project, go ahead and request if as the government has a certain amount of money set aside for such cases.
BUT DON”T FREAKING BE A HYPOCRITICAL LIAR, PANDERING TO THE UNINFORMED VOTER who really don’t know that they are being lied to.
If Palin supported and took the money for a do-nothing, wasteful project, be a real woman and a say it.
Don’t belittle Americans’ intelligence and lie about. It makes her look nasty.
Anyone with any real moral character cannot defend that she lied, that her intentions were dishonorable.
SO the extreme LIE about the Earmarks trumps the actual wasteful earmark itself.
Posted by: can't be trusted | September 6, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
“Addressing civil rights activists in Selma, Ala., Sen. Barack Obama traced his “very existence” to the generosity of the Kennedy family, which he said paid for his Kenyan father to travel to America on a student scholarship and thus meet his Kansan mother.
The Camelot connection has become part of the mythology surrounding Obama’s bid for the Democratic presidential nomination. After Caroline Kennedy endorsed his candidacy in January, Newsweek commentator Jonathan Alter reported that she had been struck by the extraordinary way in which “history replays itself” and by how “two generations of two families — separated by distance, culture and wealth — can intersect in strange and wonderful ways.”
It is a touching story — but the key details are either untrue or grossly oversimplified.
Contrary to Obama’s claims in speeches in January at American University and in Selma last year, the Kennedy family did not provide the funding for a September 1959 airlift of 81 Kenyan students to the United States that included Obama’s father. According to historical records and interviews with participants, the Kennedys were first approached for support for the program nearly a year later, in July 1960. The family responded with a $100,000 donation, most of which went to pay for a second airlift in September 1960.
Obama spokesman Bill Burton acknowledged yesterday that the senator from Illinois had erred in crediting the Kennedy family with a role in his father’s arrival in the United States. He said the Kennedy involvement in the Kenya student program apparently “started 48 years ago, not 49 years ago as Obama has mistakenly suggested in the past.” “
Posted by: Samantha | September 6, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
jayhawk: “And, Obama has the nerve to question earmarks and pork in other candidates?”
Can you cite where he “questions earmarks and pork”? What most rational people see is him questioning pork sucked up at a greediest-in-the-nation rate by a Govenor now proudly beating the podium as being against pork. Some folks get a bit worried when politicians are so blatently lying, and it says something about Palin’s cult of personality that her fans aren’t batting an eye. When Obama supported that FISA bill, he was pummeled by his so-called “cult.” Palin’s the real deal – if she tells you she’s against children smoking while lighting up a stogie for a four year old you all would just cheer and point out that evil Obama subjected his daughters to second hand smoke once.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
More Washington Post details on the pork/earmarks to Hunter Biden:
The Obama/Biden investment in Hunter Biden’s salary has paid large dividends.
With so many friends among his father’s colleagues, Hunter didn’t need to meet with Dad to score pork for his clients.
It’s a sterling example of how members of Congress, such as Obama and Biden, offer hypocritical sanctimony on their relations with lobbyists while ensuring that family and friends get their share from the public trough.
One particularly interesting case involves a private Catholic university.
Democrats insist that school vouchers for urban parents would violate the Constitution because the parents might choose to send their children to parochial schools.
However, since Hunter Biden signed St. Xavier University, a four-year, 5,600-student institution run by the Roman Catholic Sisters of Mercy in Orland Park, IL as a client, he has managed to secure them over $300,000 in federal grants.
Hunter specifically landed St. Xavier U after telling them he could get them government pork.
This is the kind of activity against which Barack Obama rails about on the campaign trail.
While in the Senate, though, Obama actually enables it through these kind of quid pro quo arrangements that give the appearance that Biden has no conflict of interest.
In contrast, John McCain doesn’t do earmarks at all — not for himself, not for his friends, and not for his political allies.
One candidate talks the talk, and one candidate walks the walk.
The former picked a porker who took almost $7 million from lobbyists and lawyers over the last 20 years, sources which this candidate has demonized for months on the stump.
The latter wants to end the practice altogether and promises a confrontation with both parties in Congress if elected.
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Mr Incredible –
The thing is, your arguments are almost logical, UNTIL you throw out an accusation about jealousy. That is an emotional argument, not a logical argument.
I could care less what she looks like. Yes, she is an attractive woman, in particularly after 5 children. She takes care of herself, which is a great message to send.
I care about her politics. I care about whether what she says gibes with what she does. At this point, that does not appear to be the case.
I just want to hear HER explanation of the bridge, not a sound bite. I want to hear her answer relevant questions to the job of Vice President.
That is not jealous,y that is my right as an American citizen so I can walk into the voting booth on Nov. 4th and make a fully INFORMED decision. I need to hear her answer questions. She may be fantastic, she may win me over. I just need to know she isn’t afraid to answer questions. I cannot see entrusting someone to the second highest office in the land without hearing that she understands John McCain’s policy positions and frankly, I would like to hear hers, as she could very easily end up president.
Posted by: PORKY PALIN | September 6, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Who gives a damn about some ancestral crap.
I CARE ABOUT MY MONEY, MY JOB, MY FAMILY, MY HEALTHCARE, MY HOME, MY FUTURE.
AND I CARE ABOUT SOMEONE LYING TO ME ABOUT MY TAX PAYING DOLLARS BEING USED FOR A DO NOTHING PROJECT, While lying to me on national TV like I was some unintelligent idiot, expecting me to really believe it.
Posted by: can't be trusted | September 6, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Wow Obamna supporters are now admitting Governor Palin as a powerful competent Governor.
Posted by: geevill | September 6, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
So, jhw,
Obama thinks pork is good?
Or, Obama only questions pork he and Old Joe Biden don’t provide?
Obama must get up every morning and say, “Do what I say, not what I do.”
Anybody But Obama…
Posted by: Jayhawk | September 6, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
It is hard for me to wrap my head around that 500 million in donations to the Obama campaign. I know it isn’t there yet, but close. Maybe that’s why Pelosi wants another stimulous check. I wonder how many people sent theirs to the campaign.
Posted by: Maria | September 6, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Let’s consider Obama’s stirring tale for the Selma audience about how he had been conceived by his parents, Barack Obama Sr. and Ann Dunham, because they had been inspired by the fervor following the “Bloody Sunday” voting rights demonstration that was commemorated March 4.
“There was something stirring across the country because of what happened in Selma, Alabama,” he said, “because some folks are willing to march across a bridge. So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born. So don’t tell me I don’t have a claim on Selma, Alabama. Don’t tell me I’m not coming home to Selma, Alabama”
Obama was born on August 4, in 1961, and the Selma march occurred four years later, in 1965. The New York Times reported that and when the senator was asked about the discrepancy later that day, he clarified: “I meant the whole civil rights movement.”
Lies, Lies Obama Lies.
Posted by: Samantha | September 6, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Tax Policy Center: The Obama plan would reduce taxes for low- and moderate-income families, but raise them significantly for high-bracket taxpayers. … By 2012, middle-income taxpayers would see their after-tax income rise by about 5 percent, or nearly $2,200 annually. Those in the top 1 percent would face a $19,000 average tax increase — a 1.5 percent reduction in after-tax income.
Len Berman, director of the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, which has produced one of the most authoritative analyses of the two candidates’ tax plans. When we asked him if Obama’s claim that he would “cut taxes for 95 percent of all working families” was true, Berman told FactCheck.org that it was “consistent with our estimates.” Overall, the TPC found that Obama’s plan would produce a tax cut for 81.3 percent of all households, and a cut for 95.5 percent of all households with children.
Under Obama’s plan, the TPC estimates that people (or couples) making between $37,595 and $66,354 a year would see an average savings of $1,118 on their taxes.
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
So many high cost projects haven been in the “think tanks and on the table since the 1970s when the Alyeska Pipeline was started. Alaskans and oil companies wanted to build a gas line along side of the oil line but Congress said no. A deal was made with Canada that a line would be built when Canada drilled his gas wells in western Canada. So many projects have been stopped or delayed by the Democrats and the environmentalist. The other bridge northwest of Anchorage has been on the table since the early 80s.
Only about 1% of the land in Alaska is privately owened by individuals or companies. The remainder is owned by federal, state, local governments, native corporations and military. A residential lot or small acerage is very expensive. In fact, everything is expensive because everything has to be shipped in including food, furniture, vehicles, clothes, building materials, etc. There with the exception of some home grown foods, you must pay extra for shipping costs.
Few people in the south 48 are very informed about Alaska, its people, its resources or its problem.
Natural resource are sold from federal lands to Korea, Japan and other countries and these revenues are three times what Alaskans get back from Uncle Sam. In fact, Alaska is a “gold mine” for the US federal government.
Posted by: Mary | September 6, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
Concerned in OH: “The facts and links are all over this board.”
Still waiting for that link about how Obama attained pork for his family.
I’m not trying to convince you, but I get annoyed at the consistent lies and false innuendo you spout.
Posted by: jhw539 | September 6, 2008, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
John McCain doesn’t call his earmarks, he just would give billions of tax paying dollars to BIG OIL as his campaign is controlled by Lobbyist who are lobbying for big oil companies.
Wrap it up how you want, that looks like an EARMARK to me.
Posted by: can't be trusted | September 6, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
What’s the difference between James Dobson and Sarah Palin? Lipstick.
Posted by: sanity | September 6, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
JHW539–
Good point. When Obama voted yes for that FISA bill, I was ticked. My husband had all but decided to vote for Bob Barr after that. In fact, we did not contribute to Obama’s campaign again until after Sarah Palin’s speech. She fired us up alright. Her denigration of the work of community organizers prompted us to make a large donation to Obama that very night.
I do find it incredibly odd that people who couldn’t pick Sarah Palin out of a lineup a week ago, now support her with such devotion. It diminishes their credibility significantly.
Posted by: PORKY PALIN | September 6, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
ALL your postings and rantings do not eliminate the fact that Palin LIED on national TV about the money she is taking from taxpayers to support her do nothing projects.
Someon, please defend the lie, please defend the lie.
No you can’t, so you spin the earmark and are digging for irrelevant crap because you have nothing to say.
Posted by: can't be trusted | September 6, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Look at concerned runaway and change the subject.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
Samantha,
Obama has already explained the selma statement… so yawn !!
SAYING YOU WERE BORN OUT OF A MOVEMENT DOESNT ACTUALLY MEAN YOU WERE BORN WHEN IT HAPPENED.
MY POLITICAL CONVICTIONS ( THE HATE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY) WAS BORN DURRING THE BUSH YEARS!
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
“I do find it incredibly odd that people who couldn’t pick Barack Hussein Obama out of a lineup half a year ago, now support him with such devotion. It diminishes their credibility significantly. ”
hmmmmmmm
Posted by: hmmmmm | September 6, 2008, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm
ALL your postings and rantings do not eliminate the fact that Palin LIED on national TV about the money she is taking from taxpayers to support her do nothing projects.==
Except that she didn’t lie.
==Someon, please defend the lie, please defend the lie.==
We’ve already defended the truth that she didn’t lie.
==No you can’t…==
Yes, we did.
==…so you spin the earmark and are digging for irrelevant crap because you have nothing to say.==
What a train wreck of a statement.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
You didn’t defend the the fact that she didn’t lie, you spinned her lie.
Posted by: can't be trusted | September 6, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
==I do find it incredibly odd that people who couldn’t pick Barack Hussein Obama out of a lineup half a year ago…==
He was in a lineup!?
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Samantha,
Obama has already explained the selma statement… so yawn !!
_______________________________________
Obamabot subtext: My candidate is honorable because when he lies about his past and commits a felony by sniffing cocaine at least he admits to it.
Posted by: Samantha | September 6, 2008, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
The difference between Obama and Palin on earmarks is that Palin is running specifically as an anti-earmark crusader which is a flat-out lie as has been proven by her hiring of a federal lobbyist for her town of >7000, the many federal handouts she readily accepted as Governor and she being for the Bridge to Nowhere until it was politically imprudent – though she kept the money AND built the roads to nowhere because that money would have had to go back. So you have roads leading up to where the “Bridge to Nowhere” would have been, but no bridge.
Obama has accepted earmarks, but he’s not running a campaign saying he’s completely against earmarks – so the comparison holds no water and shouldn’t even be made.
Posted by: Jonze | September 6, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
==You didn’t defend the the fact that she didn’t lie…==
I defended the truth. She didn’t lie.
==…you spinned her lie.==
No, you spinned what actually happened.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
In her earlier political career as mayor of Wasilla, Palin hired a private lobbyist to help the tiny town secure earmarks from Stevens, entering Washington’s “pay to play” culture in which lobbyists, campaign contributions and lawmakers are intertwined.
The town obtained 14 earmarks, totaling $27 million between 2000-2003, according to data compiled by Taxpayers for Common Sense.
Federal lobbying records show that Wasilla hired the firm of Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh in 2000 to arrange “funding of city projects.” The signature on the registration form is that of Steven W. Silver, a former top aide to Stevens, who chaired the Senate Appropriations Committee on and off between 1997 and 2005.
The firm initially was paid $24,000 a year, an amount that increased to $36,000 in 2001. The firm has continued to work for the town government since Palin left as mayor in 2002. Silver gave $2,000 to Stevens’ Northern Lights political action committee in 1999, according to federal records.
Stevens was indicted in July for failing to disclose $250,000 in gifts from VECO Corp., an Alaskan oil services company.
Posted by: Palin is a Phony | September 6, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Alaska’s well-known “Bridge to Nowhere” is among the most criticized federal earmarked projects, cancelled last year by the state’s governor and John McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin. Palin, however, has brought home her own share of pork, according to an examination by Taxpayers for Common Sense that was reported in the Washington Post. During the four years she was mayor of the 6,700-resident town of Wasilla, Palin hired the Anchorage-based law firm Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh to represent the small town on Capitol Hill. The result was nearly $27 million in federal earmarks in the final four years that Palin was mayor, including $1.9 million for a transportation hub, $900,000 for sewer repairs and $15 million for a rail project, the Post reported.
Despite her success in getting federal funds for Wasilla, McCain introduced Palin as his partner in fighting wasteful spending. Palin said that as governor, she “stood up to the old politics-as-usual, to the special interests, to the lobbyists, the big oil companies, and the good-ol’-boy network.” The Alaska governor has been outspoken against Rep. Don Young and Sen. Ted Stevens, who was indicted in July on corruption charges, though the law firm she hired to bring in the earmarks has connections to both lawmakers.
Palin was mayor of Wasilla from 1996 until 2002 and the town spent $96,000 on lobbying from 2000 until 2002. Overall the town has spent $300,750 on lobbying since 2000. In the first six months of this year Wasilla has spent $20,250 on lobbying efforts, about half of what it spent altogether last year.
Posted by: Palin is a Phony | September 6, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Palin is a liar thats why she wont faxe the media she is being trained ijn how to lie and cover up for the lies she has already told!
McCain wanted Lieberman “The Maverick” (Yeah right) was told )the daay before the anouncement) to pick Palin the day before and did as he was told.
I spent longer choosing my kitchen then mccain spent picking the person who could run this country!
Disgraceful !
95% of Americans will be better of under Obama, on average by at least $2000.
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
“Can you cite where he “questions earmarks and pork”? ”
Mr. Teflon vest doesn’t HAVE to!
He has his BLOGGERS… …. do it for him,
That’s how he’s gotten this far.
But be careful who you wish for…..
Be very very careful
Posted by: eyes open wide | September 6, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PALIN’S EARMARKS AND OBAMA’S IS THAT
PALIN’S BENEFITTED HER STATE!
Many of Obama’s… BENEFITTED THE OBAMAS…. AND THEIR ERSTWHILE CHURCH …AND THEIR FRIENDS!
Posted by: eyes open wide | September 6, 2008, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
Samantha,
He didnt lie! He just wasnt clear about it!
Admiting you lied is more honourable not or in your case lying more.
Fight with truth Sam!
Republicans have crewed this country its time for change Obama 08
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Moneyman–
Are you British? (honourable)
I agree with you though. I don’t think McCain can win. He is trying to make it so it isn’t about the issues. However, unfortunately for him, the economy is tanking hard core and he has nothing to offer but 4 more years of Bush.
In addition, Palin’s favorability ratings will go down over the next few weeks (as always happens), and people will refocus on the issues at which point, McCain cannot win.
Posted by: PORKY PALIN | September 6, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PALIN’S EARMARKS AND OBAMA’S IS THAT
PALIN’S BENEFITTED HER STATE!
Many of Obama’s… BENEFITTED THE OBAMAS…. AND THEIR ERSTWHILE CHURCH …AND THEIR FRIENDS!
—————————————
Obama’s… BENEFITTED THE OBAMAS…. AND THEIR ERSTWHILE CHURCH …AND THEIR FRIENDS ?
Can you point them out eyeswideopen ?
I really wish you guys would stop the lies!
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Uh oh looks like the right wing noise machine got caught lying!
And about flags, have they no shame?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Redstate as a source?
LOL.
What’s next free republic?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
Looks like the Republican mafia is putting the screws to some people aover Troopergate.
“This week, seven key witnesses informed Mr. Branchflower through their attorneys that they would not provide depositions. Their depositions, which had been agreed to and scheduled earlier with Mr. Branchflower, were cancelled within the last 72 hours.”
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
PORKY PALIN-
No but good pick up Australian born to American parents (raised in both countries)and working for a canadian American company (TD AMERICA TRADE) in Cali : )
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Per the Urban Brookings Tax Policy Center:
“Compared to current law, TPC estimates the Obama plan would cut taxes by $2.9 trillion from 2009-2018.
McCain would reduce taxes by nearly $4.2 trillion.
These projections assume the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire in 2010 and that the Alternative Minimum Tax is fully effective. ”
hmmmm
Posted by: eyes open wide | September 6, 2008, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Samantha,
“He didnt lie! He just wasnt clear about it!
Admiting you lied is more honourable not or in your case lying more.
Fight with truth Sam!
Republicans have crewed this country its time for change Obama 08″
_____________________________________
With supporters like you I don’t think that Obama needs opposition!”He didnt lie! He just wasnt clear about it!
LOL LOL
“Fight with truth Sam!”
KINDA HARD TO TO THAT WHEN YOUR CANDIDATE OBAMA LIES SO MUCH…OOOPS I MEAN WHEN YOUR CANDIDATE OBAMA IS SO UNCLEAR ABOUT MANY THINGS.
LOL
Posted by: Samantha | September 6, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Ryan C
“This week, seven key witnesses informed Mr. Branchflower through their attorneys that they would not provide depositions. Their depositions, which had been agreed to and scheduled earlier with Mr. Branchflower, were cancelled within the last 72 hours.”
I wonder of the seven key witnesses with one been promised to be the head of homeland security which one will be Fema Director ?
What a joke its clear as day she is guilty! the Yahoo email she sent gives it all way!
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Concerned: Obama outspent competition 4 to 1
Truth: Obama spent $272M while Hillary alone spent $234M
Concerned: Obama spent $500M
Truth: Though formidiable Obama has not yet raised $500M let alone spent it. Last FEC records show thru July Obama had spent $323M
concerned: Obama gave $1M to his wife’s hospital and they in turn gave her a $300K raise.
Truth: Obama requested an earmark for the hospital that ultimtaley did not go thru. Michele’s raise was in line with other VPs and a reflection of the success of her Urban Intiative.
The truth will always win over concerned
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Samantha…
Like I said fight with truth.. if all you can do is make the same stupid asertion over and over Im not surprised you voting republican..I guess your too dumb to know better!
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
I will not vote for Wilma Flinstone.
Posted by: jellybelly | September 6, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
MONEYMAN:
RE:
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PALIN’S EARMARKS AND OBAMA’S IS THAT
PALIN’S BENEFITTED HER STATE!
___________________
When you’re looking to find the ACTUAL EARMARKS of Obama’s which benefitted his family and/or his church/and or his friends…..
You have to look for a source which is not supported and fed by Obama!
Try it; you’ll like it!
Posted by: eyes open wide | September 6, 2008, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
eyes open wide.
yOU SEEN NOT TO KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEN OBAMA’S CRUCH RECIVING MONEY FOR JOBS TRAINING DURRING HE WORK IN THE STATE GOVERNMENT AND HIS FEDERAL WORK!
THE CHURCH WAS GIVEN MONEY TO PROVIDE SERVICES FOR JOBS TRAINING AND POVERTY REDUCTION!
SOrry shift key was stuck–
Posted by: Moneyman | September 6, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
Obama has never claimed that he did not take any earmarks. Almost every member of Congress has taken earmarks for their state, including McCain
The hypocrisy is Palin lying about not taking earmarks and McCain talking nonstop about earmarks and pork spending. There is no definition for pork, most of the time it is a matter of opinion.
Posted by: Jim | September 6, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
==ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — Gov. Sarah Palin’s church is promoting a conference that promises to convert gays into heterosexuals through the power of prayer.==
YYYYEEEAAAA!
==”You’ll be encouraged by the power of God’s love and His desire to transform the lives of those impacted by homosexuality,” according to the insert in the bulletin of the Wasilla Bible Church, where Palin has prayed for about six years.==
PRAISE THE LORD!
==She …opposes gay marriage and spousal rights for gay couples.==
No, she recognizes that everybody is either mail, or female, and that those who claim to be homosexual are either mail, or female.
She knows that laws that define “marriage” as being between “man” and a “woman,” or a “male” and of “female,” include those who claim to be homosexual.
So, she knows that, for instance, a man who claims to be homosexual may marry a woman who is heterosexual, or claims to be homosexual.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
So, let’s see. Obama points the finger at MCCain and while Obama was speaking at the covention about change, etc., Kerry was getting off a corporate fatcat’s jet. While Obama was saying at the convention, he was cutting down on lobbyists, etc. Nancy pelosi and the Dems had an elaborate spread on the top floor of a building only a block away from the convention for more corporate fatcats. Isn’t that a case of the pot calling the kettle black? What a hypocrite! He is in true Obama form! All I can say is that the GOP is very nervous about John mcCain because they said he hassled them as a Senator about these things and they know he will be even harder about them as President. Let’s see,,…. hmmmmmm…., are the Dems saying the same thing about Obama? I THINK NOT! Obama was handed contributor’s lists from the likes of Dodd, Kennedy and Kerry. So, who is the bigger liar and the bigger reformer? What a little liar! He just can’t stand it that McCain held his own party’s feet to the fire at the convention and Obama failed to do the same. He can’t stand that McCain already has tremendous experience with bipartisan support. He can’t stand it that McCain wants to reform things in Washington and that now Obama can’t say he is the only one who wants change to occur. It is taking the starch right out of his sail and I am thrilled to death!! Good riddance to bad rubbish Obama! Obama, Mr. common man, go to your 30,000 a plate dinner to be given by Bon Jovi in their mansion. Oh yea, he’s a common man all right! Don’t all of us attend dinners that cost 30,000 a plate? He knows he can’t outspend McCain now because the support is pouring in for him. And, not just from white women who were so offended by his sexist treatment of Hillary and his insulting treatment of Bill Clinton. There are huge corporate heads who always supported the Dem party who are now supporting John MCCain. He wanted a war and he got a war. Let’s see how that works out for him! Idiot! And you supporters just keep following him along believing anything he says. You all need a check up from the neck up!
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
On March 25th, the Chicago Tribune reports that an extensive search found no basis for an episode Obama recounts about a picture he ran across in Life magazine of a “black man who had tried to peel off his skin” in a failed effort to use chemicals to lighten it.
Obama writes that “seeing that article was violent for me, an ambush attack.”The Tribune continued: “Yet no such Life issue exists, according to historians at the magazine. No such photos, no such article.
When asked about the discrepancy, Obama said in a recent interview, “It might have been an Ebony or it might have been … who knows what it was?”At the request of the Chicago Tribune, archivists at Ebony searched their catalogue of past articles, none of which matched what Obama recalled.”
_______________________________________
Wow Obama sure is unclear a lot.
Posted by: Samantha | September 6, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
jellybelly: I will not vote for Steven Erkel for President and Bluto the bully for VP either!
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Obama:I Wrote and passed a tough Nuclear Bill
However the bill was rejected by his own party for its pandering and lack of all regulation – mainly because of your Nuclear Donor, Exelon, from which David Axelrod came.
___________________________________
So was Obama lying or was he being unclear?
Posted by: Samantha | September 6, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Young voters for Obama:
Good luck with all of that! The population is more than half gray in the US and we outnumber you so good luck with all of that in November. Because your demographic isn’t the only one that can come out in large numbers for their candidate and we are coming out in big numbers for McCain. So, we’ll see who wins!
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Ryan C.:
Oh, Republican Mafia, you mean the way Obama runs his campaign What a joke!
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Mr Incredible -
Mail?
Why do you care what other people do? Why does one narrow minded group of people get to decide how the rest of us should live our own private lives that harm no one?
Also, why is it that everyone says Gov Palin is Brave for “choosing” to have a Down’s baby. Her own Dogma would indicate that she had no choice in the matter. It takes no bravery to do something when you have no choice. She is doing what she must, not what she has chosen.
She does not believe in abortion under any circumstances, therefore she is not brave for having this child. She had no choice.
Posted by: Choice??? | September 6, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Moneyman and Porky Palin: Don’t be so sure that McCain cannot win the election. Is that why he is in a virtual dead heat with your brainless leader?
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Mr. Incredible,
Give it your best shot in November because we will all be giving it our best shot to have Obama defeated!
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Mary Anne –
It isn’t just young voters. So keep on hoping.
I don’t understand why anyone who is “gray” would vote for a man who wants to privatize social security.
Also, you have lived your life. The future of this country should not be in your uninformed hands.
Posted by: Gray = uniformed | September 6, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Mary Anne –
Dead heat in the NATIONAL polls. It ain’t so close on a state to state basis. Obama is ahead by 10 electoral votes in strongly dem states and has about a 60 vote lead in states leaning dem.
smells like a landslide.
Posted by: PORKY PALIN | September 6, 2008, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Senator Obama has sent tax payer money to his racist/hate mongering church that is building its former hate mongering pastor a big mansion. I can think of no bigger waste of money from the pockets of American workers.
Rev. Wright, “D## D### AMERICA”. But we want your taxes so we can send more money to Africa and other interest.
Obama or his supporters should not say a word about expenditures in Alaska.
Posted by: Martin | September 6, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Obama said two days after he got the nomination about the women who were still upset with him, “They’ll get over it.” Oh yes, he was a very wise man to use that strategy. Now, the supporters have shifted and changed with McCain gaining in some areas and Obama gaining in some areas but McCain’s gains among women have stayed the same! Obama’s gains are not increasing, so I guess he will not be getting over it because we plan to vote for John McCain in November. Maybe the next time that Obama think he will open his mouth to insult the female gender he’ll remember how it worked out for him this year! Idiot!
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
==Give it your best shot in November because we will all be giving it our best shot to have Obama defeated! ==
Where have I indicated that I believe other than you? I want McCain/Palin to win, too. They will.
Posted by: Mr. Incredible | September 6, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
lololololol!!! They think if they say that John McCain cannot win in November that it will be so. Gee, they are sounding more and more like George Bush aren’t they? If you just think it will be so, than it will be so. Wasn’t that his strategy? Maybe he tutored Obama and his flunkies about that tactic and that is why they are stooping to that level now. WHAT’S THE MATTER OBAMA JUNKIES, YOU DON’T LIKE IT THAT OBAMA IS IN A DEAD HEAT WITH MCCAIN? Awwwwww, poor little babies! lolol
Posted by: Mary Anne | September 6, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
The Obama campaign has spent four times as much money on their campaign and the polls say the two are in a dead heat. Money may buy corruption but hopefully it will not buy the election.
At this point, I could not vote for Obama for pooper-scooper supervisor.
Posted by: Mary | September 6, 2008, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
John McCain can’t escape George Bush. That picture is worth a thousand words and you will see it over and over and over for the next 60 days.
You cannot vote with George Bush 90% of the time and then say you are a maverick. Doesn’t work.
You should be, there’s a new day coming and it is being lead by the future of this country.
Posted by: THE FUTURE | September 6, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
By the way McCain/Palin, going to lose in November just like I told you Hillary would lose and that she would not have a floor fight. I was right and you were wrong about that.
Obama is inevitable, can’t you smell the future, it is unstoppable now.
Posted by: THE FUTURE | September 6, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Mary Anne–
How wise was it for Sarah Palin to mock tens of thousands of people who work for little or no money?
Her speech was a fantastic fund raiser — for Obama. He raised $11 million dollars in the 24 hours after her speech, which included 50,000 new donors.
This thing is not as close as you think.
Posted by: THE FUTURE | September 6, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
The jury is in, Paulin is two-faced. If as he says, McCain fully vetted Paulin then he by extension is also two-faced or lacks reading in any case they must not become Vice President, President ELECT.
Vote Obama – Biden!!
Posted by: Phx Ranger | September 6, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Moneyman:
I apologize for saying that Michele’s employer, the University Of ILLinois Hospital, received $1,000,000. in earmarks from Bozo.
I was wrong!
Her employer received MEGA MILLIONs of dollars!
The Illinois State University, however, didn’t fare a smidgeon as well.
So much for Political PORK!
Posted by: eyes open wide | September 6, 2008, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“How wise was it for Sarah Palin to mock tens of thousands of people who work for little or no money?”
An Obama supporter’s fantasy. Palin and Gulliani mocked “Community Organizer” Obama. WHAT? oh, someone who recruits union memebers and rounds up winos to vote on election days.
Posted by: geevill | September 6, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
“I mean, words mean something”
Like obama’s words regarding promising to take public financing? or Obama’s words promising to fillibuster and vote against FISA?
Words like G-Damn America?
Posted by: geevill | September 6, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
McCain was stupid to select the Queen of Mean.
His entire message of being a moderate and ‘bipartisan’ Senator is totally in shatters: he belongs to the religious fringe. They have become the face of his campaign which was already totally paid for by Big Corp, that other fringe group Americans love to hate. The foreign policies of his campaign are dictated by the Neocons. These are the three fringes most associated with Bush/Cheney and Obama and Biden will have no problem pointing that out to the voters. When the race is over come election day, Palin-McCain will have polled in the lower thirties nationwide.
Being perceived as a moderate and a bipartisan was the entire reason the race was still close. The Palin-bump (pun intended) is already stalling. It can only go down for them. The more we learn about Palin, the more voters will turn away.
Palin-McCain don’t have any prospect for expanding their ‘base’ right now. Their only hope is that their base will still be as blinded by Dominatrix as they are after just 1 week of Palin-hysteria. Anything that was supposed to be positive about the Dominatrix has been dumped on the American public in carefully scripted appearances. The negatives will be highlighted in the coming months.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 6, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Yourgameletsplay: There are 670,000 people in Alaska. There are 12.8 million people in Illinois. Palin’s earmarks average out to $676 per person for Alaskans. Obama’s earmarks average out to $72 per person for residents of Illinois.
Hmm, who got more pork for their constituents?
Posted by: JKM | September 6, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
geevil: “Like obama’s words regarding promising to take public financing?”
And what were Obama’s words exactly? For instance, what did he say about outside groups (527s) and their role in the campaign and what McCain could do about that? And what was McCain’s response about what he would or more exactly wouldn’t do about those 527s?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 6, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
eyeswideopen: Learn to add. Illinois State University had $1.3 million in Obama earmarks.
And by the way people, did you notice that one of the biggest recipients of Obama earmarks was the Army Corps of Engineers, for which Obama requested $33 million? How sad is it when a senator has to request money for a Federal Agency to be able to do its job properly.
Posted by: JKM | September 6, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
“Engineers, for which Obama requested $33 million? How sad is it when a senator has to request money for a Federal Agency to be able to do its job properly.”….
That WASN’T the biggest>
Look again!
Posted by: eyes open wide | September 6, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Palin hates earrmarks so much she had her Lt governor run againsat don young because of all the earrmark money she took.
Don Young a 35 year institution in alaska and Palin showed the courage to take him on that is how much she hates earrmarks.
Obama on the other hand doesn’t want to fix the earrmark process.
He is fine with attaching museums to flood control projects. He doesn’t understand the system.
Obama gave earrmarks to the hospital his wife works at and at the time all of a sudden her salary was doubled.
Posted by: David | September 6, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
The dems have all the control of congress.
Reid will have a filibuster proof majority in the senate.
Pelosi will have a huge majority in the house.
We need McCain there to veto there out of control spending.
Obama loves pork.
This election is so clear. We need a balanced government with McCain vetoing the out of control spending from reid and pelosi. Not with Obama and pelosi and reid.
We need balance. McCain has even said he would testify weekly before congress.
McCain is the CIC we need not Obama.
This election is so clear.
Posted by: To Eyes wide open we need McCain to veto spending from Pelosi and Reid | September 6, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
“Palin hates earrmarks so much”
She requested $200M more in earmarks 2 months ago.
Young is being challenged because he is about to be indicted.
“Obama gave earrmarks to the hospital his wife works at and at the time all of a sudden her salary was doubled.”
Michelle Obama got her raise on 2005.
Obama put in for an earmark in 2006 but it did not make the final budget bill.
The right wing lies.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
>>> future imperfect:
Mary Anne–
How wise was it for Sarah Palin to mock tens of thousands of people who work for little or no money?
______________
Sarah Palin mocked ONE man who made a big “magillah” about his service as a community organizer….. because he was putting down HER experience as a mayor of a small town!
Quit the phoney caterwauling!
Posted by: america*centric | September 6, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
According to a CNN Special, Obama was a failure as a community organizer. Later he would use a political colleague one day for political gain, then back-stabbed them the next week. Something like throwing so many associates or friends under the bus.
Obama need for political power is scary. He care not about Americans, but for the political power of Obama. All the CNN people have been for the candidate Obama. He is a political mad man. No way, Obama.
Posted by: Mary | September 6, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Some context might be helpful. Illinois has nearly 13 million residence, Alaska fewer then 700,000. Obama has been in the Senate 3-1/2 years, while Palin has been Governor less than 2. So Palin’s requests amount to $330 per person per year, dwarfing Obama’s $20 per person per year.
Posted by: John | September 6, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm
I still cannot get over the fact that she allows people to shoot Polar Bears from low flying planes and is sueing the goverment because Polar Bears are on the extinct list and she want them taken off the list so she can drill for more oil.
How sad is this.
Posted by: Mike | September 7, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
‘Here’s one highlight: Obama sought money for the University of Chicago Hospitals. Wife Michelle works for the University of Chicago Hospitals, appointed in spring 2005 as vice president for community and external affairs at the University of Chicago Hospitals. She is now on leave from the job to campaign for her husband. Top campaign adviser and friend Valerie Jarrett is the Chair of the University of Chicago Medical Center Board and also Chair of the Executive Committee of that board. She has also been named Vice-Chair of the University’s Board of Trustees. “
Posted by: america*centric | September 7, 2008, 4:53 am 4:53 am
Geevill said: Governor Palin can not spend federal tax dollars unless they are appropriated by Congress.
————–
And she doesn’t get them unless she asks for them.
Palin and McCain have made earmarks an issue. If she is such a champion of the taxpayers’ money why did she go ahead and build the road-to-nowhere instead of returning that money. That road was supposed to lead to the bridge to nowhere but now it ends at an empty beach.
The earmark for the road required it either be spent on the road or returned to the federal treasury. She chose to build the road.
Posted by: Sandy | September 7, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am
Yup, I think a lot of politicians are guilty for earmarks. However, which Governor, and or Senator were actually trying to create jobs, and energy for the nation, and which was claiming their earmarks for for those poor and destitute?
As for Michelle….she got the raise, when the hospital got the earmark. Coincidence? Also to note… they turn away those constituents they say they are trying to help, if said constituents don’t have valid insurance.
It must be nice to sit on the pedestal of hypocrisy, and look down your nose, at everyone else.
Posted by: Jeanie | September 7, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“Obama said his position on this was simple. “If you got a terrorist — take him out. Anybody who was involved in 9/11? Take him out.”"
But how do know if they had anything to do with 9-11 unless you CATCH THEM?
>smirk<
Posted by: drjohn | September 8, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Sorry- you can take that out. I got the wrong thread.
Posted by: drjohn | September 8, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm