Unanswered Question Watch, Day 14: Are McCain-Palin Endorsing Sen. Ted Stevens’ Re-election?
You may recall that, two weeks ago today, I asked the McCain-Palin campaign a very simple question.
To wit:
*
From: Jake Tapper
To: McCain-Palin Campaign
Tuesday, September 09, 2008 8:38 AM
Subject: Question
Are McCain/Palin endorsing Sen. Stevens’ re-election?
*
A simple and fair question, right?
Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, is up for re-election this year. He’s been indicted on corruption-related charges, and how McCain and Palin feel about whether the self-proclaimed King of Pork should return to the U.S. Senate would do a lot to say whether the two are reformers, or partisans, first.
The response from the McCain-Palin campaign was as simple as the question I’d asked:
*
From: McCain-Palin Campaign
To: Tapper, Jake
Sent: Tue Sep 09 09:02:41 2008
Subject: RE: Question
Will get back to you.
*
It has now been more than two weeks. I have re-sent the question several times. They do not want to answer the question.
Combine that with the facts that Sen. McCain, R-Ariz., has gone 41 days without taking questions from the press corps following him around, and that Gov. Palin, R-Alaska, has gone every one of the 25 days, since she was introduced to the nation as McCain’s running mate, without holding a press conference.
It all adds up to a campaign that seems to think it should be handed over the keys to leadership of the Free World without having to answer straightforward, substantive, tough questions from the Fourth Estate.
That’s called lack of accountability.
Which begs the question if a McCain-Palin administration would even hold press conferences.
- jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Typical. The Republicans feel as if they are entitled to the White House, and how dare you question them on it. And if you do, you’re “sexist” if you question Palin, or “Unamerican” if you question the POW McCain. Answer some questions for God’s sake!
Posted by: WideEyed | September 23, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Jake,
You’re dead on. Keep it up! I hope that you hold all four candidates’ feet to the fire. An informed democracy is a strong democracy.
Posted by: Buffaloed | September 23, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Any “hard hitting” questions for Obama there Jake??
Posted by: Larry | September 23, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
the McPalin administration will be extremely more secretive than Bush/cheney
Posted by: watching | September 23, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
The McCain strategy is Orwellian. Apparently they’ve decided that electing a leader is like deciding to buy a Coke.
The scary thing is, if they win – what’s ahead? Politics will become ever more stage-managed. Thankfully, they’re tanking in the polls.
This is why I like Biden. Sure, he makes gaffes, but at least he’s out there talking (and talking, and talking) to people who ask real questions.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 23, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
we will have an open administration!!!
/lies
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 23, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Do you expect them to talk to the press? If they talk to the press, we might know who they really are what they really plan for America. We might find how shallow both are in their understanding of what is really happening in the streets and small towns of America. Of course they won’t talk to the press….they have a country to bamboozle.
Posted by: algwriter | September 23, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Question not asked: Why won’t obama release his medical records?
Posted by: hadenough | September 23, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
This is crazy. Is McCain and company only going to give canned speeches without questions during their administration too? Look at the problems the current administration’s secrecy has created. Another reason to doubt the change mantra coming from McCain.
I don’t buy the all media are biased argument. Some media outlets are biased, but let the voters make that determination. Answer questions please Senator McCain and Governor Palin.
Posted by: demand accountability | September 23, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Larry
anyone with eyes and ears knows Obama answers hard hitting questions, even if you don’t like the answers.
In America you at least come from behind the curtain, “be a barracuda” and take questions
Posted by: simple | September 23, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Who knows. Are Senators Obama and Biden endorsing Congressman Rangel’s re-election? How about the Democratic Congressman from Louisiana who’s under indictment?
Thanks Jake, for more of your “fair and balanced” snark.
Posted by: Chad3337 | September 23, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
hadenough, Obama did release his medical records. Why must you distract?
Posted by: huh? | September 23, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Simple, would that be all 8 hard hitting questions?
Jake, how did you know McCain was concerned about the people affected by AIG? Oh yeah, because he was on ABC talking about it! You know ABC, the company you “work for”?
Posted by: Zaggs | September 23, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
It’s a pity Jake isn’t monitoring a debate with such a relevant pressing question. Who are you endorsing Jake?
Posted by: geevill | September 23, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
Obama’s campaign in chaos:
Obama’s campaign promises unlike to take place.
“”Does that mean I can do everything that I’ve called for in this campaign right away? Probably not,” he said. “I think we’re going to have to phase it in.”
The Illinois senator has proposed ambitious and expensive initiatives aimed at health care, education, infrastructure, alternative energy and other concerns. He didn’t say what proposals might be delayed first, adding that tax revenues would play a role in any budget decisions.”
Obama’s call for Democrats to follow Republican’s fiscal toughness.
“In a speech Monday, Obama urged Democrats to be as fiscally tough as conservative Republicans and said that the bailout was forcing a new perspective on the federal budget.”
Obama criticized his mate Joe Biden for running his big mouth.
“Obama said in the interview aired Tuesday that his running mate, Joe Biden, should have waited before commenting on the idea of bailing out the huge insurer American International Group Inc. Biden initially rejected bailing out AIG, a position taken by Republican presidential candidate John McCain that drew Obama’s criticism.
When AIG’s financial meltdown first drew questions of possible government intervention, McCain said taxpayers shouldn’t be “on the hook” for AIG or any other corporation. Biden also said that the government shouldn’t bail out AIG. For his part, Obama at the time didn’t take a position on the idea of a buyout.
‘I think that in that situation, I think Joe should have waited as well,’ Obama told NBC.
Both Obama and McCain have since said the government’s plan to lend AIG $85 billion was regrettable but necessary.”
Posted by: ablanche08 | September 23, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
well, clearly the reporters are picking on McPalin. With all due respect to the American people, most of them don’t know enough about politics, foreign policy, the economy or any of a number of other key issues beyond how they see how it might directly benefit or hurt them. I’ll grant you that the 4th estate has been acting like a bunch of 8th graders at camp, but if that is the case, then McPalin is only willing to take questions from the 1st grade class during lunch. Grow a pair John. Don’t staff it out, you used to not have a problem talking to the press. Your campaign is handling you, you have already lost control of any kind of Presidency you could possibly have. You are a puppet candidate.
Posted by: Danny | September 23, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Jake,
Ask Obama/Biden if they are endorsing Representative William Jefferson’s re-election!
Once again, the questions you ask of McCain/Palin are skewed compared to Obama/Biden.
If McCain/Palin have no interest in talking to you, perhaps you should start to question yourself openly about why!
Just because you are part of the media, doesn’t mean anyone has to talk to you!
Get a clue!
Posted by: bob | September 23, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Bush = McBash = McSame = McShame
My ‘friends I know McBush Can get the
Job done to Lock the United States
into a Decade long 2nd Great Depression
…… AND MY FRIENDS BLAME YOU…….
FOR VOTING FOR HIM……………
Posted by: Anita Yova | September 23, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
John McCain is out and about amoung the people answering questions and the media is whining about it. I wouldn’t give you 3 seconds of my time if I were them either.
Posted by: Kitty | September 23, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
huh?,
No obama did not release his medical records. A one page note from his doctor is not releasing his medical records.
“A week after Republican John McCain released medical records to show his own clean bill of health, the Obama campaign released a letter from Chicago physician David Scheiner summarizing the 46-year-old candidate’s condition.”
For comparison mccain released 10,000 pages of records obama got a note from his doctor.
Posted by: hadenough | September 23, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
do you really think it’s in your best interest to have presidential candidates controlling their message without questions from an outside party. regardless of the political party doing the shunning, you should expect more. this isn’t a football game that you are winning or losing, this is so much bigger than that.
Posted by: too simple | September 23, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
bob,
They don’t have to talk to Jake. They should be accountable to the people though. The media is the best opportunity we have to ask questions of the candidates. Not all bad and not all good, I’m afraid.
Posted by: shades of grey | September 23, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
You don’t think it’s slightly, oh, I don’t know, IRONIC that Bill Clinton, BILL CLINTON, is saying “I get why she’s hot out there”?? And Palin is an “overnight star”, kinda like a CELEBRITY, wouldn’t you say, just what the Republicans are accusing Obama of being? Yeah, her kids are just as cute as a button, but that isn’t a reason to vote for her, especially with McCain (remember him?)flailing around out there about the economy and Sarah “hold me accountable” Palin REFUSING to answer questions about the abuse of power investigation Troopergate. Speaking of corruption in Alaska politics…
Posted by: mila | September 23, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Kitty
“John mcCain is out and about answering questions by the people”
you mean the questions that are pre selected with no follow up?
are those the questions you mean
the press is the voice and questions of the people
just like they were when you and Mccain and Bush and Cheney tried this tactic with
wmd
closed door energy policy
Libby
Katrina
presidential signing statements
Mission accomplished
Harriet Myers
Gonzales
Brownie
deregulation lobby
abu ghraib
Rumsfeld
afghanistan falling apart
energy speculation
…and the list goes on
you and mcCain
same team
same tactics
same results
9th year.
throw these bums out
Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 23, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Does Obama think Rangel should be re-elected?
Does he think he should step down from Ways and Means?
All interesting questions!
In truth, the answers don’t matter much, they are obviously politically sticky questions with no good answer.
Palin has done nothing to support or protect Stevens lately.
Posted by: MayBee | September 23, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Day 8- When is the MSM going to cover the fact that Obama went to Iraq and tried to delay negotiations for draw down until after the elections? I’m still waiting.
Posted by: Kim | September 23, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I guess politicians don’t have to answer questions anymore and as their policies of deregulation have resulted in socializing our economy…
maybe it should be
King Mccain and Queen Palin?
sad that our country has fallen this far in 8 years… that these two could even be looked at at this point
the real America and what it stands for would throw these bums out yesterday.
Posted by: dl (the real one) | September 23, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Why does everyone make comments about Obama using a teleprompter? McCain and Palin read from a notebook on the podium, and they don’t even try to hide it. If you watch him, after every sentence he looks down at the podium. I would ask if he thought he would fool anyone into thinking he was memorizing his talks by not having the teleprompters on stage, but I guess he has.
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
I love the distracting comments and conspiracy folks, but the bottom line is that the gotcha personal questions are irrelevant on both sides. I don’t care much about Ted Stevens and his relationship with this campaign. I do care about the economy and so should all Americans. McCain and Palin need to answer these questions.
Posted by: Economist | September 23, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Neo-cons do their best “dirty” work behind a screen of secrecy, always have, always will. Look at Bush/Cheney and what do you see? Palin/McCain.
Posted by: JR | September 23, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
so what do we really know about Palin?
even Alaskan republicans that know and like her are afraid by the total shutdown.
Will she at least talk to us after meeting all these foreign leaders?
Every politician always does.
WE CAN QUESTION HER, SHE IS NOT THE MOTHER OF JESUS!
Posted by: old lady | September 23, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
McCain and Palin should answer questions about how they would govern.
Posted by: Issues | September 23, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Economist, only in the warped mind of a neo-con could the question, “Are McCain/Palin endorsing Sen. Stevens’ re-election?” be considered personal and irrelevant.
Posted by: JR | September 23, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Sarah has lots of pictures now to prove her skills at foreign affairs.
What more do you want from her?
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 23, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
In typical Karl Rove Republican fashion, McCain is running a stealth campaign. Distraction, innuendo and outright lies are all the Repubs have to work with.
THEY CERTAINLY CAN’T RUN ON THEIR RECORD.
McCAIN/PALIN:
SAME BUSH, DIFFERENT DAY.
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 23, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Guys, we can’t have it both ways!!!!! We can’t cheer when he writes bad stuff about the other guy then call him biased when he does the same about our guy!!! Both these candidates have faults…..hello, they are human!!!! so how about we listen to their policies and decide which one’s policies suits you and your family?? It’s really quite simple, neither one of them will do everything they say they will anyway!!!
Besides, people on here who like Sen. McCain won’t suddenly like Sen Obama simply because someone calls McCain a ‘creepy old man’ or the other way around because someone calls Obama ‘elitist’!!
Think for yourselves and don’t blame the media. You DO know that you can always watch MTV or something like that instead of the news, right? Right?!!!
Posted by: WoeIzMe | September 23, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
LOL, McBush/Failin are idiots. they are too busy lying and spreading half truths to answer real questions. What surprises me is that there are sheeple out there actually supporting them!
Sally
Posted by: Sally SoMo | September 23, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
dl-it is not a lie, there are conflicting stories therefore the media needs to ask questions to get to the bottom of it. Period. If this was anyone else, questions would have been asked, that’s the problem they never question Obama about anything. I just hope that you people are willing to stand up and take responsibility along with the media if he is elected and screws up this country.
Posted by: Kim | September 23, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Sheer and utter arrogance on the part of the McCain/Palin campaign–they obviously feel they have to answer to no one by carefully controlling their access to the press. It is now crystal clear to even the most disinterested observer that their sense of entitlement to the Presidency is only outweighed by their sense of accountablility to no one!
Posted by: chuck | September 23, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Sally,
SHEEPLE!!!!
You Win a Set of Steak Knives!!!!
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 23, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
McCain just proves that the press isn’t what it use to be.
Jake so he doesn’t answer so what? The public doesn’t care.
Posted by: Thinking | September 23, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
Jake is supporting geevil, that is the answer, because you and me need to know where our candidates stand on issues, that is what Jake is doing. Period.
Posted by: BKMC | September 23, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
When you hear Barack Obama and his supporters discuss his experience as a Community Organizer they are talking about his time working for ACORN, Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now. That’s his qualifying experience for the Presidency of the United States. He started working there shortly after his graduation from Harvard Law School. He has had a longstanding relationship with ACORN every since.
ACORN has a long history of getting into trouble with the law for less that ethical methods of registering voters. Their troubles go back years and cover local elections in their Chicago home area as well as nationally. Its just been one thing after the other. All they have tried to do is get voters registered and they just keep on getting into trouble for it.
They seem to have the unfortunate habit of registering people to vote who aren’t eligible to vote. A recent incident had to do with the Pennsylvania Primaries. Philadelphia and Delaware County election officials have requested the U.S. Attorney’s office to look into multiple claims of voter fraud during that primary. And still he didn’t take Pennsylvania. That must have hurt.
Apparently, they are accustomed to doing whatever is necessary to win. There has been a history of accusations and indictments for buying votes, dead voter registration, taking the phone book and whatever else is handy to register whoever they can to vote.
In Milwaukee there is a criminal investigation into the activities of 39 ACORN employees. The violations include falsifying legal documents (driver’s license numbers, Social Security numbers, etc) for voter registration cards and offering gifts to get people to sign up to vote.
“(ACORN) Workers … said they were under pressure from the community-organizing group that hired them to sign up more voters,” The Seattle Times reported . “Workers told investigators they went to the Seattle public library and filled out the voter registration forms, by using contrived names, addresses and Social Security numbers and in some cases plucked names from the phone book.”
Right now, there are allegations that ACORN is targeting underage voters. Its seems that studies have shown that the demographic the democrats are targeting are often not on college campuses, which they have focused on in the past. So now they are targeting high school students in an attempt to get more of their demographic registered …. apparently regardless of age.
Posted by: Samantha | September 23, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
The press has every right to expect answers from Palin. How else will we the people know where she stands on the issues? The repetitive lies (Bridge)and pre-scripted former Bush adviser pablum she has been feed and is regurgitating at campaign rallies are not answers. Now the McCain campaign has effectively shut down the Troopergate investigation until AFTER the election, even though Palin initially promised to cooperate: “hold me accountable” she declared! Holding her accountable would be allowing the voters to hear all the facts BEFORE they decide who to vote for.
Posted by: mila | September 23, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Why can’t the media strike back? If McCain-Palin won’t give press conferences then all the big media outlets should stop covering their campaign. No more McCain bookings on the morning and late night shows. No more distribution of the lies Steve Schmidt spreads in response to the truth told by the opposition. No more surrogates appearance on TV. Make Fox News the only organization that would pay attention to them. Make Sarah Palin invisible by not broadcasting her speeches. I don’t know if you have noticed but it is exactly the same speech recited over and over again.
Posted by: Fundamentals of our Insanity | September 23, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
“What will you do to help the economy Mr McCain?”
You know I was a POW for five years. I didn’t have a chair, or a desk.
“What will you do to improve our health insurance?”
Well when I was a POW, I didn’t have the luxury of chosing my own doctor.
“Can you tell us what consitutes “victory” in Iraq.
Having been a POW, I know all to well what it is like not to be free.
“Ok? Let’s try your VP candidate.”
“Gov Plain, some argue that you may be dangerously unqualified for the job of VP. How do you repsond to that criticism?”
Well, Shawn, uh, some people don’t think small town mayors know about running the country. And you know that you can’t blink. And Shawn, you should know Shawn, that being a mother of five Shawn, I understand the trials of the average mother. You can’t blink.
“Ok? Thank you for your “answers”
Posted by: Lips are moving but ...... | September 23, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Samantha,
I truly hope you have saved your reams of text for a book. It would be cool if the dust cover was made of foil so I can fold it into a hat.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 23, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
JR, I don’t think Stevens should be re-elected and I do think he should be investigated and prosecuted. I think when you get into a campaign of “who do you know”, then you are on a slippery slope. The issues become secondary in the campaign. This is the type of things neo-cons use to distract the conversation.
There is a financial meltdown in progress. Democrats can win on this issue alone. I expect all candidates to answer questions related to policy issues.
Posted by: Economist | September 23, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
Does Obama endorsing Rep. Charles Rangel, DN.Y?
Posted by: adam | September 23, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
The story of Obama trying to hold off troop withdrawal is false, but some of you Republicans will run with any piece of unsubstaniated garbage and try to make something out of it. I suppose that you want the government to hand over a blank check as well?
Why won’t Mc/Palin talk to the media, or answer actual questions from people? What do they have to hide? (besides tropopergate, bridge to nowhere, no regulation or oversight, etc.)
Posted by: jozy | September 23, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
What is the Rangel connection, because he is black? Please esplain to me.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 23, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
hadenough,
You are worried about Obama’s medical records? McCain, age 72 and survivor of 2 bouts with cancer, has yet to release all of his records. (Allowing select reporters a few hours to look over the tome of records with no electronic or recording devices does not count.) I forgot, McCain has been so honest about things that we are to take his word that the cancer will not be coming back.
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
If Palin and McCain won’t answer media questions, they can’t govern the United States of America. Or any democratic country for that matter.
Posted by: Danny | September 23, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Mack,
You must understand that this is a food fight, or rather they are rubber and you are glue so any accusations only stick to you.
In other words a mature, thoughtful dialectic is at work here.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 23, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
I suspect that Palin-McCain will let you/us know whether they endorse Sen. Stevens’ re-election soon after the verdict is in, which could be later today or tomorrow….
Posted by: Joel | September 23, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Leonard Peltier
Rangel did not pay Tax for 15 years from the income he made from rent?, He cheated IRS?
Rangel was using appartment alloted for low income?, but charging full rent inthe expenses?
I can lsit 20 more reasons to show ragel is a fraud?
Posted by: adam | September 23, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am
adam,
Is Rangel Running this year?
Has Rangel involved Obama in any of his professional or personal dealings?
What is your point?
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 23, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Fabulous George Will op-ed in the Washington Post comparing McCain and Obama’s reaction to the financial crisis. Aptly entitled “McCain Loses His Head” it explains all the various ways he did just that last week while Obama remained cool under pressure. George Will, BTW, is a Pulitzer Prize-winning CONSERVATIVE columnist.
Posted by: mila | September 23, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Looks like the news media needs to make some “cutbacks”. Do I see some pink slips coming?
Posted by: Dave | September 23, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Yes, “the press isn’t what it used to be” – no longer cowed by Karl Rove’s smokescreen and bluster.
The press has started to wise up again and take responsibility for the role they play in our system of government.
Having been suckered into supporting the DISASTROUS WAR IN IRAQ, and then mocked by the Neo-Cons as belonging to “the reality-based community”, journalists have rebelled and are finally DOING THEIR JOB.
REPUBLICANS HAVE PROVEN THEMSELVES UNTRUSTWORTHY.
McCAIN HAS PROVEN HIMSELF UNTRUSTWORTHY.
OBAMA = LEADER
McCAIN = LIAR
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 23, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
hey jake . too bad . ur ignored. i hope mccain wins and never talks to u
Posted by: dave | September 23, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
hadenough, given that Obama’s doctor stated that Obama is in excellent health, and that Obama has only reported minor problems such as upper respiratory infections, skin rashes, and minor injuries over the last 21 years, what extra information is it you’d like, exactly? Do you want to know what antibiotics he was prescribed for those respiratory infections? I mean, come on.
McCain released – well, I say released he didn’t actually release them, he let reporters have a short supervised period to look at 1,173 pages (not 10,000) of health records – anyway, McCain ‘released’ his records because he has a history of skin cancer. That’s the kind of thing people ask questions about. Letting people see his health records addresses that.
That doesn’t apply to Obama. He doesn’t have a history of skin cancer.
Posted by: Aengil | September 23, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
when you don’t expect candidates to answer policy questions, then you get what you’ve got — George W. Bush.
Posted by: answers needed | September 23, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
So we’re supposed to get our information about the candidates from CAMPAIGN ADS?!
The Darrell Hammond sketch at the beginning of Saturday Night Live last week just about summed it up (and Loren Michaels is a McCain contributor). Anybody who bases their opinions on those, from either party, is exactly the stupid part of the electorate they are aiming at, so congratulations!
Posted by: mila | September 23, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
It’s beyond belief that the likes of Larry can compare questions for Palin with questions that have been posed to Obama. He’s been grilled every which way and sideways for almost 2 years. She won’t even take a question about the state that she governed for a mere two years! If you choose to remain blind and deaf to her isolated state that’s your business, but don’t act like Obama hasn’t taken tough questions. And by the way Chad, if you don’t like the mainstream media you can always go blog on Fox or chat with Rush–they’ll be right up your alley.
Posted by: perumal11 | September 23, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Time to wake up folks. McCain and Palin are marketing, not campaigning.
Posted by: Alarm Clock | September 23, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
You go girl!!
But you do spend an inordinate amount of time at disinformation for someone who has a life.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 23, 2008, 11:20 am 11:20 am
“Rangel did not pay Tax for 15 years from the income he made from rent?, He cheated IRS?”
Cindy McCain (ya know the breadwinner of the family) failed to pay property taxes in her condo in Coronado for 4 years.
If you want to play whose party has more corrupt members, the Seven Indicted Republicans(Delay, Doolittle, Cunningham, Ney, Frist & Stevens) alone top anything the Democrats have done.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
dl – Do you really want someone to compile a list of all the “kept from the public” secrecy from the last Democratic administration, and then take that broad brush to apply to Obama? Monica, Health Care Reform/Magaziner, Maggie Williams/Vince Foster, Cisneros, Reich/Contract with America memos, Chinese donors, nuclear technology sales, …
same ambition
same self-righteousness
samer results (without the dot-com boom to drive economy/growth)
Posted by: TTR | September 23, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
McCains Oil Tycoons, are in bed with Alaskas oil company. Of course they are going to protect Sen. Ted Stevens. He could be the October suprise, against Palin. The Oil Tycoons, also known as McCains Advisors, Are controling the ‘value’, of the American dollar. Why do you think, McCain and Palin are so, anti-green energy?
Oil Tycoon, scare tactics, are against the ‘bailout’, because THEY, want to BUY you out.
Vote ‘No’, to Multi-faced McCain. Vote ‘No’, to McCains advisors.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 23, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Barack Obama never changes anything. He’s most adept at getting elected. Then he runs for a higher office on a new promise of change, without having changed much of anything in the old.”
Barack Obama: His profession as Campaigner is his qualification for President.
Posted by: Samantha | September 23, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Where is the mention of McCain being slapped on the wrist for the Keating Five (Savings & Loan scandal, the last major government bailout)?
Since that time, why has McCain repeatedly voted for deregulation on bills submitted by his economic adviser Phil Gramm?
Remember the 2000 “Enron loophole” legislation. That was brought to America by Gramm and supported by McCain.
Remember the 1999 banking deregulation legislation. That was brought to America by Gramm and supported by McCain.
Posted by: Dan | September 23, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
hey ryan c u forgot obama is from chicago .there are hundereds of corrupt dem. there . obam is one of them.
Posted by: dave | September 23, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
How Obama’s unanswered questions regarding Ayers?
“The Obama campaign has cried foul when Bill Ayers comes up, claiming “guilt by association.” Yet the issue here isn’t guilt by association; it’s guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago.”
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
I think some people are missing the point of Jake saying his question is not being answered. It is a simple question, and the lack of an answer is symptomatic of a bigger problem with the McCain/Palin campaign. Neither are taking questions from the press (softball or hardball questions). What happened to the Straight Talk Express? Why are they shielding Palin from unscripted questions from the press? We have a month and a half before the elections. Do you think they are going to suddenly open up once the election is over?
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am
So Jake, instead of worrying about this non-issie how about Obama’s unanswered questions regarding Ayers?
“The Obama campaign has cried foul when Bill Ayers comes up, claiming “guilt by association.” Yet the issue here isn’t guilt by association; it’s guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago.”
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Ryan C -
Rangel’s a public servant, with disclosure requirements — Cindy McCain isn’t.
Rangel’s in charge of the Congressional committee overseeing tax and other financial laws — Cindy McCain isn’t.
Rangel’s the one with a mess of different tax (evasion) issues* – Cindy McCain had the one.
* NYC/Harlem property, rental income, property in DR, sale of house in DC, etc.
As to “most” crooked party – why bother comparing? There’s a pattern on both sides of the political spectrum of people with power abusing that power. Doubt one does it more than the other over a long time span.
Posted by: CS | September 23, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
“That doesn’t apply to Obama. He doesn’t have a history of skin cancer.
Posted by: Aengil”
How do we know what applies to obama? How do we know what obama’s medical history is? He refuses to release his medical records. A note from a doctor that had seen obama for more than 18 months is not “obama has released his medical records.”
The nyts before the primaries ended:
“No presidential candidate should get to the point that he has locked up his party’s nomination without public vetting of his health.”
That was before obama had a doctor write a note for him. Hillary and mccain get trashed by the times but strangely obama is not mentioned. obama refused to release his medical records. We have no idea what he might have a history of. None. Yet the times never mentions obama and his refusal.
Obama refuses to release his medical records, something so important the nyts said it should be done before a candidate is nominated by their party. So Aengil please tell me how we know what applies to obama?
Posted by: hadenough | September 23, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
Goodness gracious Jake, John McCain is a former POW. Do you know how much he sacrificed for this country? How can you suggest such a thing. I think you must be a closet Obama supporter with all your negative waves towards the McCain campaign. And I am getting really tired of your sexist tone towards Sarah Palin!!!
Really. My Word! Holy Moley! Of all the nerve! Good golly Miss Molly!
Just because John McCain doesn’t know much about economic policy, and Sarah Palin has about as much smarts as a fortune cookie, gives you NO RIGHT to use that kind of tone in your writing.
Posted by: Bud | September 23, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
How about we asked Obama some questions for a change Jake?
“The Obama campaign has cried foul when Bill Ayers comes up, claiming “guilt by association.” Yet the issue here isn’t guilt by association; it’s guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago.”
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
“I think some people are missing the point of Jake saying his question is not being answered.”
No. I think Jake is missing the point. We know it is an irrelavant biased “gotcha” question.
Posted by: geevill | September 23, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Yes Jake, I remember you asking that question, and I too have been waiting for the answer.
To address the many who think the question is irrelevant, I’ll point out that Stephens is from Alaska, the state of which Sarah Palin is governor, and the question as to her support or non-support ties in directly to her claim of going against the “good old boys” network. It seems that she only “goes after them” when she no longer needs them for political clout.
That makes the question a critical to our judgment of her claims. Please, keep asking.
To those who wonder why Jake Tapper has to ask the questions, I ask “who else has the ability to ask?”
Palin and McCain have sequestered themselves from the electorate, speaking only to controlled crowds. With only a few weeks left until the election, time for discovery is running short.
KEEP ASKING, JAKE.
Posted by: Jerry Ulibarri | September 23, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
McCain and Palin have nothing to offer but the same old stump script. No access, no insights, no connection to their souls. They could be replaced by wax mannequins with voice-over loops. The arrogance of McCain/Palin is really a smack upside our heads. Wake up, people!!!
Posted by: Disgusted | September 23, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
We’re waiting Jake.
“The Obama campaign has cried foul when Bill Ayers comes up, claiming “guilt by association.” Yet the issue here isn’t guilt by association; it’s guilt by participation. As CAC chairman, Mr. Obama was lending moral and financial support to Mr. Ayers and his radical circle. That is a story even if Mr. Ayers had never planted a single bomb 40 years ago.”
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Mack – it’s not a simple question and Jake knows it. That’s why he’s asking about Stevens, and not about the other Senators up for re-election.
A M/P endorsement for Stevens opens up lines of attack from Dems who can say “how serious are they about removing fraud/corruption/earmarks .. if they support Stevens.”
A M/P rejection of Stevens could derail his campaign, and cost the Rs a seat in the Senate at a time when they’re fighting for them.
So this gotcha question doesn’t get answered? There’s other pressing issues, and no voter is going to make a yes/no decision on the basis of support for Stevens.
Posted by: North | September 23, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Obama is the WORST candidate that has EVER run for President in ANY party.
He was in the Senate for 143 days before the Chicago Political Machine turned him into “Obamestein” and made him its candidate for President.
He did not pass even ONE bill of ANY consequence. He has NO executive experience whatever.
He voted “Present” ONE-HUNDRED and THREE times while in the Senate. At other times he was not present at all.
He dedicated two books to Jeremiah Wright, who shouted “God DAMN America!” immediately after 3,000 Americans lost their lives in the 9/11 terrorist attack. Wright is good friends with Farrakhan and Quadafi.
Obama involved himself with William Ayers, a bomber terrorist, and Tony Rezko, a thug slum lord.
Obama got large amounts of money from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
His campaign managers are HEAVILY tied into the financial scandals that are rocking Wall Street.
Posted by: Samantha | September 23, 2008, 11:44 am 11:44 am
McCain whants to take away, ‘Freedom of the Press’. Limit our ‘Freedom of Speech’. How much of the American Constitution, does he want to take from us.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 23, 2008, 11:47 am 11:47 am
Why should they hold a press conference if this is an example of questions they would be asked?
The question of whether Stevens is re-elected is up to the voters of Alaska.
Posted by: geevill | September 23, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Does Obama call for the resignation of Charles Rengel?
Posted by: geevill | September 23, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Knowledgeable political science professors with bad hair pieces from institutions founded by founders agree:
Palin-McCain ticket may or may not be effected if failure to answer Tapper yields three or more nasty blog headlines.
Posted by: ricky | September 23, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Bill Ayers information has been out for several years. Old news. Nothing new.
As for McCain and Palins ties to Senator Stevens of Alaska. More Oil Tycoon connections? McCains advisors and Senator Stevens, in bed together?
Vote ‘No’, to McCain.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 23, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Sarah Palin wants to consult with Bono and other world leaders before answering. In tongues.
Posted by: ricky | September 23, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
“Does Obama call for the resignation of Charles Rengel?”
Only if someone else does first.
Posted by: Mack | September 23, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
How will the world survive if the media is not in control? What would us poor dumb folks do if we were not spoonfeed their lies?
Posted by: Dave | September 23, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Looks like a lot of fighting going on today between Obama & Biden. I call it Biden’s “war on terror”!
Posted by: PatR | September 23, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
“Why should they hold a press conference if this is an example of questions they would be asked”
Your defense is that they should not have to answer any hard questions?
Really?
How hard is it to say no to endorsing a Senator who is indicted?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
“Had enough” asked if Obama has released his medical records. “Larry asked if Jake had hard hitting questions for Obama. I agree. Ask Obama if he will release his medical records. Ask Sarah Palin too. Anybody got a smoke?
Posted by: ricky | September 23, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Jake can you post another blog? We are bored with this one.
Posted by: Samantha | September 23, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Perhaps the McCain campaign is weary of ticking off Stevens for fear he will say something revealing about the VP.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
“Fact Check has caught the Obama campaign in another lie about John McCain’s position on the issues. This time, its about health insurance and the Obama campaigns contention that McCain wants to do to health insurance “what he did for Wall Street deregulation.”
This is a lie, pure and simple. McCain was referring to the “banking industry” and specifically, allowing people to move across state lines with their insurance.
Considering how the press was screaming last week about McCain’s “lies” about Obama, one might legitimately question the intent of the media for not calling Obama out on his repeated lies regarding McCain’s positions as well.
But we know the answer to that question, don’t we?”
Posted by: Samantha | September 23, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
I want a serious question asked. Will McCain use the bail out as an excuse to avoid building the border fence since he really does not want it?
Posted by: Bill D. Fence | September 23, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
hadenough: “How do we know what applies to obama? How do we know what obama’s medical history is? … We have no idea what he might have a history of. None.”
Sorry, but that’s utter garbage. His doctor told us what Obama has been seen for over the last 21 years – and I quote – ‘medical checkups and various minor problems such as upper respiratory infections, skin rashes and minor injuries’. That’s it. That’s his history.
If you’re insisting that you don’t know what his history is, you’re either ignoring the facts or you’re basically saying “yeah, but his doctor might be lying!” So if he released his medical records and they showed nothing, would you suddenly believe them, or would you just move on to “how do we know those are his full medical records? They could have been edited!”
You’re blatantly just looking for reasons to attack Obama. But given the information provided by Obama’s doctor, there is absolutely no need for him to release his full medical records. Get over it.
Posted by: Aengil | September 23, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
So why won’t Obama release his Columbia University grades?
Posted by: Samantha | September 23, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
“Stanley Kurtz’s articles today on NRO and in the Wall Street Journal are must reads. Three takeaways:
* Obama had a long-term working relationship with William Ayers.
* The Chicago Annenberg Challenge (“CAC”), the only executive experience on Obama’s resume, was an objective failure despite the expenditure of millions of dollars.
* Through the CAC, Ayers and Obama financed radical organizations, including one with a history of engaging in voter fraud.
Stanley’s work is a challenge to mainstream journalists. A candidate for the presidency has a demonstrated working relationship with — indeed funded — an unrepentant terrorist, yet the media have spent more time reporting about Sarah Palin’s hair styles.”
Posted by: Samantha | September 23, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
“This is a lie, pure and simple. McCain was referring to the “banking industry” and specifically, allowing people to move across state lines with their insurance.”
yes we know that is what he meant to say.
One of many things that McCain meant to say but didn’t that needed clarifying later.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I believe the simple answer, Jake, is to wait until the legal proceedings are complete.
Legal hearings are currently underway. We do believe in due process, Jake, heh?
Jake, we do believe in innocent until proven guilty?
Fool
Posted by: Captain America | September 23, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“lack of accountability”……
Kind of like ABC hosting Obama advertisements on it’s web site here at Political Punch and not disclosing how much revenue the Obama campaignis paying ABC for these links…….
And then, surprise surprise whining they will not answer my email.
Or how about ABC (or is it Jake) not liking criticism so they make changes to and/or delete posts critical of ABC’s coverage….”tough questions” ABC and Jake cannot answer.
Posted by: Cathy | September 23, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Poor Jake
They will not answer my email.
Whine. Whine. Whine. Day 14
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Captain America,
What does the legal process dealing with Stevens have to do with whether Palin endorses him or not?
And if Palin is waiting for said process to be complete, why not just say so?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
from the WSJ:
“Mr. Ayers is the founder of the “small schools” movement (heavily funded by CAC), in which individual schools built around specific political themes push students to “confront issues of inequity, war, and violence.” He believes teacher education programs should serve as “sites of resistance” to an oppressive system… The point, says Mr. Ayers in his “Teaching Toward Freedom,” is to “teach against oppression,” against America’s history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.”
In essence, he wants people to “think outside the box.” Radical? You be the judge. (is promoting bilingualism “radical” too?)
Kurtz raises some interesting points, but there is little substance. Give me concrete examples. Kurtz does the interpretation for us.
Posted by: In the dark | September 23, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
It’s very amusing whenever the media appoints itself as Guardian of the Public Interest.
Stop crying about the interests of the media not being promoted by McCain/Palin.
The MSM shot itself in the foot with (a) being so in the tank for Obama, and (b) being so hysterical about the Palin pick. The public sees the bias, as shown in poll after poll (and admitted officially by the liberal Washington Post).
Nobody is crying over’s the MSM’s growing irrelevance.
Posted by: Arthur | September 23, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
@Carolyn: Courtesy of factcheck
Q: Was Barack Obama really a constitutional law professor?
A: His formal title was “senior lecturer,” but the University of Chicago Law School says he “served as a professor” and was “regarded as” a professor.
Posted by: In the dark | September 23, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Just in – Palin press may boycott the UN convention because Palin will only allow photographers & cameramen – no print reporters, no questions. She only wants photo-ops.
Per Politico:
“Palin’s handlers informed the small print press contingent covering her campaign that the print reporter designated to cover the events, Elizabeth Holmes of the Wall Street Journal, would not be allowed to cover the sprays.”
“The sprays are basically glorified photo opportunities during which journalists can snap photos and film footage and – if they’re lucky – shout a question or two at Palin and her company before she adjourns for private meetings.”
“The campaign’s reasoning was that there were not going to be questions or statements at the sprays, so they were only appropriate for photographers and cameramen.”
And McCain will finally give a press conference today in Michigan.
Posted by: cincyr | September 23, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
@Arthur:
“Nobody is crying over’s the MSM’s growing irrelevance.”
Let’s just get rid of the MSM, then we can just take all candidates for their word. That’s what the McCain/Palin campaign is trying to do…I don’t take ANY candidate for their word…
Posted by: In the dark | September 23, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Arthur, So what you are saying , is that, if a stranger walks up to you, and says,”I will now control your life”, you would not even care who that stranger is.
You would just say, “Ok”. And follow them around.
SHEEP.
Vote Independant.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 23, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Thanks for continuing to sound this alarm. At least some of us are worried about what it would mean to elect a ticket that so clearly has no regard for the role of a free press in a functioning democracy.
Posted by: Maggie | September 23, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Four weeks have gone by and still no press conferences. Yet you routinely publish any trash they put out for McCain and against Obama. You are being used.
The press is just a paper tiger, the latest little fuss will amount to nothing. His supporters love it.
Posted by: Thinking | September 23, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
@Carolyn: (courtesy of Factcheck, once again)
“Ask him if he still going to tax large families with homes greater than 2,400 sq feet if they make less than 250,000.”
Q: Would Obama tax my profits if I sell my home? Would he tax my IRA? Would he tax my water?
A: No. A new e-mail being circulated about Obama’s tax proposals is almost entirely false…The e-mail continues with a string of made-up taxes that it falsely claims Obama has proposed. He has not proposed a tax on new homes with more than 2,400 square feet, or a new gasoline tax or a tax on retirement accounts. The most laughably false claim is that Obama would tax “water.”
Carolyn, you should take a minute and think about WHO your sources are. If you take all the emails forwarded to you at face value, you are not making an educated decision with your vote. At the very least you can vent your gripes about valid points. Check your propaganda at the door.
Posted by: In the dark | September 23, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Samantha: Kurtz’s work isn’t a challenge to the media, the guy is a hack. He’s been trying to push this story for ages, even before he had access to the CAC records.
Kurtz’s problem is that the William Ayers that Obama knows isn’t a terrorist. He’s a Professor at the University of Illinois. “Obama knows Professor!” isn’t much of a story, so he has to make Ayers out to be as much of an evil radical as possible.
Unfortunately he has to stretch to do that, and it shows. For example, Kurtz writes “The point, says Mr. Ayers in his “Teaching Toward Freedom,” is to “teach against oppression,” against America’s history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.”"
Ayers did write “teach against oppression”, but… well, here’s the full quote, see for yourself:
“I want to teach against oppression and subjugation, for example, and against exploitation, unfairness, and unkindness, and I want others to join me in that commitment. I want to teach towards freedom, for enlightenment and awareness, wide awakeness, protection of the weak, cooperation, generosity, compassion, and love. I want my teaching to mean something worthwhile in the lives of my students and in the larger worlds that they will inhabit and create. I want it to mean something in mine.”
Yeah, that’s really some shocking stuff there. Teaching towards freedom? In the land of the free? How dare he!
And oddly enough, he doesn’t say anything about ‘teaching against America’s history of evil and racism’.
Kurtz is a hack. I’ll be interested in hearing more about CAC when someone without an agenda reviews their records.
Posted by: Aengil | September 23, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
@Carolyn
“I could go on and on. Enquiring minds want to know, Jake.”
Here, just to make it easy for you before you “go on and on”:
Posted by: In the dark | September 23, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Here is another way to put it.
If a New Iraqi leader was to step up and say, “I will rule this country very well”.
Does anyone in Iraq, OR the rest of the World, want to know everything about this person?
Everything means ‘good and bad’. But I at least look for everything.
Obama fans, look at her good side.
McCain fans, look at her hidden side.
Thats Equality.
That SHOULD be America.
The same should be applied to ALL candidates, and only your personal opinion, will sway your vote.
But only through, educated questioning, can you Truely be informed.
The End.
Maybe… :)
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 23, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
I wonder how many autographs she’ll get while she’s at the U.N. I mean what can she actually speak with AUTHORITY about. Palin at the U.N. is a disgrace to our country.
Why would McCain actually send her to speak with anyone of substance? Thank god the weather is nice in NYC, that way they have something to talk about.
Posted by: Gary | September 23, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Thinking-
when I see a remark from any camp, I research everything I can on that subject.
Past. Present. and a possible Future.
But this only leads to a personal opinion.
I could state all kinds of facts, but you will only see it as an opinion.
You, yourself must study, what You want to learn.
If You do not want to know more, about Palin. Then you will know, no more, than you do.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 23, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
All hail the artful dodgers.
They want the highest political office in the Land but they don’t want to be answerable to the People.
The last time I checked, we are in a Democracy and the power is supposed to belong to the People.
The Press represents the silent majority and the remain the fourth estate of the three arms of Government and they are the People that amplify our voices.
Any Political Office Aspirant that can not tolerate the “nuisance” of these People’s Representative is not worth being voted to Office.
Posted by: Dare Nigeria | September 23, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Like Puxatawney Phil, McCain is about to emerge to speak with the press today.
If he is frightened by his shadow, its 6 more weeks of press black outs.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Obamabots,
How about doing your own research for a change? Do you rely on Obama and the media to tell you what to think?
Palin was well known to McCain supporters and regular folks who vetted her and pushed for her selection.
Posted by: geevill | September 23, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Keep asking! It is entirely relevant. You can’t campaign on a platform of reform if you support one of the good old boys who you claim you will take on. Ted Stevens is hugely popular and powerful in Alaska. Palin knows she needs his support, whichever side of the deal he comes out on. I’m sure she’ll save the reforming zeal for those in Washington who are not as politically helpful to her.
Posted by: Laura | September 23, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“Palin was well known to McCain supporters and regular folks who vetted her and pushed for her selection”
McCain met her once in person and they had 1 phone call. The vetting team went to Alaska a day before she was announced.
The roll out of Palin has included lie after stupid lie about her record.
BTW when did high powered DC lawyers and lobbyists become “regular folks”?
Posted by: Ryan C | September 23, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Obviously they can’t answer questions, because if they do, they will lose. But what the hell–they’re going to lose anyway, so why not give it a shot?
Posted by: Mark F | September 23, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
OBAMA HAS RELEASED HIS MEDICAL RECORDS, IT WAS ONE PARAGRAPH, THAT SAID: HE IS IN PERFECT HEALTH, IF NOT A LITTLE TOO THIN.
YOU DON’T CARE, WHY WON’T MCLAME RELEASE HIS 1,100 PAGE MEDICAL REPORT. APPARENTLY HIS MELANOMA IS B A C K!
Posted by: Andrea D | September 23, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Obama has no character witnesses outside of Michelle, Ayers, Emil Jones, Wright, Pfleger and Axelrod.
Posted by: geevill | September 23, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
The question is broader than whether McCain/Palin support Senator Stevens. It should include if their commitment to overturn the status quo and clean up DC includes supporting the defeat of the McConnell, Kyl,Boehner et al congressional leadership team. How can you reform Washington if you support the current leaders who have failed to “put the country first”?
Posted by: DjK | September 23, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“It all adds up to a campaign that seems to think it should be handed over the keys to leadership of the Free World without having to answer straight-forward, substantive, tough questions from the Fourth Estate.”
No, it all add us to a Fourth Estate that thinks it should annoint our next President without having the voters make the choice.
Posted by: geevill | September 23, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Could you ask Obama these questions:
- What was your final GPA at
Occidental College (attended 2 years), Columbia University (attended 2 years), Harvard Law School (attended 3 years).
(The average GPA of someone being accepted into Harvard is 3.9 and LSAT score of 176.)
Obama was 5 years out of college when he went to Harvard Law School. Only about 8% of those acccepted into Harvard are 5 or more years out of college
- Did you receive any special treatment in getting accepted into Harvard? Such as affirmative action plans, insider help, political connections or other influences.
- Did any one in Chicago help to get you accepted into Harvard?
- At the time did you apply to any other law schools other than Harvard? Were you accepted at those schools?
- Harvard is very expensive. Yet just before starting Harvard in 1988 you went on a 3-week trip to Europe and a 5-week trip to Kenya. How could you afford all those traveling expenses, plus pay the Harvard tuition and living costs on the salary of a Chicago community organizer?
-Did you receive any scholarships or funding of any kind to pay for your tuition and expenses at Harvard? What were they, how much and who provided the money?
- Did you every meet or have acquaintance with Bill Ayers and/or people associated with Bill Ayers from 1985 to 1988?
Posted by: Zank | September 23, 2008, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
They just want you to want it. They are taking access away so people go after it. It is reverse psychology. And further proof that they prefer trivial games to dealing with issues that concern voters.
Posted by: MARTY | September 23, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
This Stevens is a crook from Alaska, taking bribes from oil companies. The key word is “Alaska” the state Palin is from. What are the people of Alaska thinking? This is the senator that was over the sub-committee in 05 when oil company CEO’s were called in about price gouging, he REFUSED to swear them in. Had they been swore in then anything they said un-truthful could come back to haunt them. Now indicted for taking kickbacks from an oil company and lying about it, who would have thought! We “The People” should have zero tolerance for corruption!
Posted by: rickyt1234 | September 23, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Jake is crushed that he isn’t #1 on the candidates speed dial.
Posted by: notafool | September 23, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
This Stevens is a crook from Alaska, taking bribes from oil companies. The key word is “Alaska” the state Palin is from. What are the people of Alaska thinking? This is the senator that was over the sub-committee in 05 when oil company CEO’s were called in about price gouging, he REFUSED to swear them in. Had they been swore in then anything they said un-truthful could come back to haunt them. Now indicted for taking kickbacks from an oil company and lying about it, who would have thought! We “The People” should have zero tolerance for corruption!
Posted by: rickyt1234 | September 23, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Reagan proved that deficits don’t matter.
And now Bush has proven that the mainstream media doesn’t matter.
Does anything matter anymore?
Posted by: cvcobb01 | September 23, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
Even if you support McCain, there’s no good reason to support or defend the McCain-Palin disdain for our national press.
Remember that it was John McCain whopromised to hold weekly Q&A sessions with the press if he’s elected.
That, we know for sure by now, was a bold lie.
Same is true for Palin’s call for transparency in government.
Posted by: herta | September 23, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
What’s the difference between Ahmadinejad and Palin?
Lipstick?
No.
Ahmadinejad speaks to reporters.
Posted by: maria | September 23, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
The press has been SO fair to Gov. Palin and her family so far. For crying out loud, your network got the first interview with her. Is Charlie Gibson incompetent? Did he go easy on Gov. Palin? To me, it looked like he was a lot tougher on Gov. Palin than ANY reporter (save O’Reilly) has been questioning Sen. Obama in interviews. Seriously, do you honestly believe that the coverage of this campaign has been down the middle fair? Just asking…
Posted by: Stevereno | September 23, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Simple really, McCaine/Pallin won’t take questions because they know that they have no answers.
Posted by: Maxx1 | September 24, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am
Jake, simple answer for you! IGNORE the McShrub/Stalin campaign. This should go for ALL networks.
They want to be treated according to the “fairness doctrine”. Well guess what, if they don’t answer questions, then simply STOP covering them! It’s as easy as that. If they want “Equal” coverage….then DO YOUR JOBS and dig up crap they don’t want you digging into. It is then and ONLY then that you will get the information that you seek out of them.
Posted by: Dave | September 24, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am
I reckon if they were asked the same kinds of questions as Obama they’d be a lot keener to do it.
Eg. “Senator McCain, do you think that the historic nature of your campaign will help heal the divisions in our nation?”
The press is too soft of Obama. Try digging up HIS skeletons and see if he’s just as keen to talk to you. I doubt it. He can blacklist press he doesn’t like and no one notices because he’s still got so many reporters in his corner cheering.
How often is Obama interviewed on Fox?
Posted by: Rob P | September 24, 2008, 4:54 am 4:54 am