Undermining McCain Campaign Attack, Republicans Back Obama‘s Version of Meeting With Iraqi Leaders
Earlier this week, the campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., seized upon a column in the New York Post that described Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., as having urged Iraqi leaders in a private meeting to delay coming to an agreement with the Bush administration on the status of U.S. troops.
"Obama has tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a drawdown of the American military presence," Post columnist Amir Taheri wrote, quoting Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, who told the Post that Obama, during his meeting with Iraqi leaders in July, "asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the U.S. elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington."
The charge — that Obama asked the Iraqis to delay signing off on a "Status of Forces Agreement," thus delaying U.S. troop withdrawal and interfering in U.S. foreign policy — has been picked up on the Internet, talk radio and by Republicans, including the McCain campaign, which seized on the story as possible evidence of duplicity.
The Obama campaign said that the Post report consisted of "outright distortions."
Lending significant credence to Obama’s response is the fact that — though it’s absent from the Post story and other retellings — in addition to Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, this July meeting was also attended by Bush administration officials, such as U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker and the Baghdad embassy’s legislative affairs advisor Rich Haughton, as well as a Republican senator, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.
Attendees of the meeting back Obama’s account, including not just Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., but Hagel, and Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffers from both parties. Officials of the Bush administration who were briefed on the meeting by the U.S. embassy in Baghdad also support Obama’s account and dispute the Post story and McCain attack.
The Post story is "absolutely not true," Hagel spokesman Mike Buttry told ABC News.
"Barack Obama has never urged a delay in negotiations," said Obama campaign national security spokesperson Wendy Morigi, "nor has he urged a delay in immediately beginning a responsible drawdown of our combat brigades."
Buttry said that Hagel agrees with Obama’s account of the meeting: Obama began the meeting with al-Maliki by asserting that the United States speaks with one foreign policy voice, and that voice belongs to the Bush administration.
A Bush administration official with knowledge of the meeting says that, during the meeting, Obama stressed to al-Maliki that he would not interfere with President Bush’s negotiations concerning the U.S. troop presence in Iraq, and that he supports the Bush administration’s position on the need to negotiate, as soon as possible, the Status of Forces Agreement, which deals with, among other matters, U.S. troops having immunity from local prosecution.
Obama did assert at the meeting with the Iraqis that he agrees with those -– including Hagel and Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — who advocate congressional review of the Strategic Framework Agreement being worked out between the Bush administration and the Iraqi government, including the Iraqi parliament.
The Strategic Framework Agreement is a document that generally describes what the relationship between the two countries should look like over time.
According to one person present at the meeting, Obama told al-Maliki that the American people wouldn’t understand why the Iraqi parliament would get to have a say on the Strategic Framework Agreement, but the U.S. Congress would not, especially since Bush is only months from leaving the White House, regardless of whether Obama or McCain succeeds him.
Morigi said in a statement that "Barack Obama has consistently called for any Strategic Framework Agreement to be submitted to the U.S. Congress so that the American people have the same opportunity for review as the Iraqi parliament."
It’s possible, Obama advisers believe, that either Zebari or Taheri confused the Strategic Framework Agreement — which Obama feels should be reviewed by Congress — with the Status of Forces Agreement, which Obama says the Bush administration should negotiate with the Iraqis as soon as possible.
Two officials of the Bush administration say that if Obama had done what the Post story asserted –- which they believe to be untrue -– Crocker and embassy officials attending the meeting would have ensured that the Bush administration heard about it immediately. If such an incident occurred in front of officials of the Bush administration, it would have constituted a foreign policy breach and would have been front-page huge news; it would not have leaked out two months later in an op-ed column.
Nonetheless, based on nothing more than the Post report, McCain senior foreign policy adviser Randy Scheunemann issued a statement earlier this week, expressing outrage.
“It should be concerning to all that (Obama) reportedly urged that the democratically-elected Iraqi government listen to him rather than the U.S. administration in power,” Scheunemann said, apparently not having talked to anyone with knowledge about the meeting in the Bush administration, the U.S. embassy in Baghdad, Hagel, or any Republican staffers on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
“If news reports are accurate, this is an egregious act of political interference by a presidential candidate seeking political advantage overseas,” Scheunemann continued. “Sen. Obama needs to reveal what he said to Iraq’s foreign minister during their closed door meeting. The charge that he sought to delay the withdrawal of Americans from Iraq raises serious questions about Sen. Obama’s judgment, and it demands an explanation.”
What actually demands an explanation is why the McCain campaign was so willing to give credence to such a questionable story with such tremendous international implications without first talking to Republicans present at Obama’s meeting with al-Maliki, who back Obama’s version of the meeting and completely dismiss the Post column as untrue.
– Jake Tapper and Kirit Radia
Email
Chrysler Super Bowl Ad Pro-Obama?
President Obama Tops Mitt Romney in New Poll
THe minute I saw Chuck Hagel’s name I tuned out.
Posted by: mike | September 19, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
This story only reaffirms the fact that the McCain campaign is truly desperate and will hang on to lies and rumors to deserve the American public.
Posted by: Ro | September 19, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
I wouldn’t put anything past Obama-he went to Iraq already believing in his head he was President Obama.
BO actually thought that silly self-serving Berlin speech was a good idea.
Posted by: harry | September 19, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Good JOb Jake and Kirit. I felt that this story was shakey at best.
Posted by: jenny | September 19, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Because facts don’t matter to the McCain campaign. Which means facts won’t matter to a McCain administration.
I am past the point of understanding how anyone can vote for this man. Racism is the only thing I can think of.
Posted by: PJ | September 19, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Wow, it took you guys all week to cook this explanation up?
Can’t wait to see what defense you guys come up with for the Palin email hacker.
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
I believe a candidate that willingly inflames racial tension and risks a race war just to get elected is capable of anything.
Posted by: riley | September 19, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Washington Post sinks to a new low. Thanks, Jake, for fact-checking our so-called news organizations.
Posted by: John | September 19, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
riley:
So then why has Obama consistently played the race card throughout this campaign??
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Jake,
I guess I give up on you now. I can see now that you’re in the bag for Senator Obama since you’re fact-checking lies against him. How dare you do that? You, journalists, are not supposed to be fact-checking lies. Just report them! Now I see you all didn’t jump on the story when it initially came out. You were trying to legitimize it, huh? How bias of you?
Posted by: D | September 19, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Obama said the surge wouldn’t work and only changed his mind to get votes.
He voted against funds for extra body armor and equipment.
Why would the troops trust this guy to be Commander in Chief?
Posted by: meggie | September 19, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Chuck Hagel is the Joe Lieberman of the GOP … and not only that, the McCain spokesman said, “…if these reports are true …”
…. if they were true there would definitely be a problem for Obama!
Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | September 19, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
This isn’t just a Political Punch, it’s a Political Sucker Punch. The heading “Undermining McCain Campaign Attack” is a dishonest representation of what happened here. The McCain Campaign didn’t “attack” anyone. They did exactly what they should have done — reserved judgement while asking Obama to explain. If you are going to carry Obama’s water in such an obvious way, you should at least ask his campaign to compensate you for writing what is akin to an Obama Campaign press release. Does ABC News and the Obama Campaign have a joint employment understanding you guys?
Posted by: Kevin | September 19, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
More McCain lies.
TYPICAL REPUBLICAN.
OBAMA IS A LEADER.
McCAIN IS A LIAR.
Posted by: Ed from MA | September 19, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Smears don’t work as well when the economy is failing. The NY Post is not a legitimate news source. It’s the Page 6 gossip rag as proven once again.
Posted by: SET | September 19, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Get on the hacker story Jake. Who cares what Chuck Hagel says. Trying to spin the story in Barry’s favor as usual.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Why does BO constantly play the race card unless he thinks whites will feel guilty and vote for him.
He’s got 95% of AA vote so playing the race card with them is like preaching to the choir–unless he’s hoping for 100% of the AA vote.
All of this talk about from the pro-O media about voting for McCain is racist, and Biden saying vote for BO because he is black, or if BO loses there will be a race war is a complete turn off to white voters.
So I don’t know why BO constantly plays the race card unless he is desperate because he isn’t far ahead in the polls.
Posted by: riley | September 19, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
“Chuck Hagel is the Joe Lieberman of the GOP”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
JOHN MCCAIN == LIES
LIES == JOHN MCCAIN
Some people will find this acceptable. Perhaps even admirable. Such people betray America.
Posted by: John | September 19, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
harry, Obama’s great Berlin speech was terrific, it showed the world what kind of leader Obama is, bringing 200 000 Berliners on the street, is a job well done Obama. Obama is presidential and McCain is confused and out of touch.
Posted by: BKMC | September 19, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Well, the email hacker story is not a “smear.”
So, let’s see how far and wide you guys go to cover up and justify criminal activity.
Looks like America is going to need another Woodward and Bernstein to follow the trail on this one, because the MSM is obviously not going to do it.
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
McCain is shameful!
Country first vote Obama because Americans deserve truth not lies.
McCain living in mansions rolling in the gutter!
McCain puts his country first like when he sold it out in Vietnam.
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
now would be the time for all the accusers who cluttered up the posts this week to apologize….or become insignificant.
Posted by: waiting | September 19, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
Obama: Get into the face of your neighbors and argue if they disagree with me.
Obama is a smiling Mr. Nice Guy on the outside.
Chicago thug on the inside.
An instigater that tricks others into doing his dirty work because he doesn’t have the guts to fight his own fight.
Then he runs away and lets others take the blame.
Posted by: meggie | September 19, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“harry, Obama’s great Berlin speech was terrific, it showed the world what kind of leader Obama is, bringing 200 000 Berliners on the street,”
Hasselhoff did the same.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“Get on the hacker story Jake. Who cares what Chuck Hagel says. Trying to spin the story in Barry’s favor as usual.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“An instigater that tricks others into doing his dirty work because he doesn’t have the guts to fight his own fight.”
He learned his dirty tactics while he was a community agitator in Chicago.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
John McCain’s totally reckless behavior and increasing evidence that the Sarah Palin pick was a disaster are together creating serious problems for John McCain His increasing amount of “confusion” when he speaks adds to this. We shall soon reach the point where the big question in this election is going to be if John McCain himself is to great a risk to be president.
Posted by: DMR | September 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Interesting how Republicans seem to want to unload on Chuck Hagel.
Did you read the flipping artical?
“Attendees of the meeting back Obama’s account, including not just Sen. Jack Reed, D-RI, but Hagel, ***** Senate Foreign Relations Committee staffers from both parties *****. Officials of the Bush administration who were briefed on the meeting by the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad also support Obama’s account and dispute the Post story and McCain attack.
Obama made it perfectly clear that there is only one person who speaks for the United States and that is the current president.
Posted by: John | September 19, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
“Obama tried in private”
Really Jake, do you understand what “in private” means?
Posted by: geevill | September 19, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
“I believe a candidate that willingly inflames racial tension and risks a race war just to get elected is capable of anything.”
Yeah, McCain better stop with his lies…..
Posted by: indy_voter | September 19, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
If Palin used the government email like she is required to do! her account wouldn’t have been hacked so easily.
Lucky she wasn’t the VP imagine the impact it could have had national security.
PALIN she just doesn’t get.
Government email is provided to keep state secrets safe!
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
“Obama is a smiling Mr. Nice Guy on the outside.
Chicago thug on the inside.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Apologize for what??
Hagel has been in the tank for Obama since day one, and I’m sure has promised his colleagues something for going along on this one.
I have no doubts this story is true. Why did it take all week for them to report on it unless they were getting THEIR story straight??
The media has been so one-side in this election it is hard to believe anything that ANY of them say anymore.
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
SandyB,
When has Barack Obama played the race card in this campaign? You say he’s done it consistently, when has he done it once? Is the mere fact that he’s black constitutes playing the race card? Obama hasn’t played the race card, the gender card or the age card. He’s played the issues card, the one card in the deck that the GOP doesn’t want to see played. If you’re not going to back these outlandish accusations up with facts, why bother? Please give 1 example of Obama playing the race card. It’s these types of statement that epitomize the desperation of the Republican party, throw anything against the wall & hope it sticks.
Posted by: Dee Tee Gee | September 19, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
More distractions, distortions, divisions and outright lies from the Palin/McCain Double Talk Express.
What I don’t understand is why they lie about stuff that they know can be easily disproven or refuted. The Franklin Raines ad was completely untrue. This time, a Republican Senator and members of the Bush administration are calling them on their b.s.!
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | September 19, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
The McCain campaign has hijacked John McCain. That makes me sad. He used to be a good guy, or maybe he was better at playing a good guy back then. Either way, its sad.
Posted by: hang | September 19, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
repubs don’t need facts to know they’re telling the truth.
facts are for elitists.
Posted by: mm | September 19, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Andrew:
The account that was hacked was her personal account on which she wrote personal emails.
Why on earth would she be using her government account for personal emails??
In other words, let’s put the blame on the victim, rather than the criminal.
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
The McCain camp prefaced everything in a manner that allowed Obama to respond to an allegation. Unlike Obama’s people who just throw stuff out there hoping something sticks and the media doesn’t vet Obama’s crap very much at all. This needed to be vetted, and thank goodness, John McCain’s camp was looking out for us. No one in Mccain’s camp accused Obama of doing this. They just asked for clarification.
Posted by: Kitty | September 19, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
SandyB
She used it for business please read up on the issue.
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Lets take this to a logical conclusion: Do we want a President that will cherry pick information to support his own view despite clear and undeniable evidence that said view is very distorted? I mean wouldn’t such a President be detrimental to the well being of the United states and its people?
Such a President would be able to justify anything, simply by claiming it to be true and using the most ephemeral evidence as ‘fact’ to support that truth at the expense of more reliable advice and information.
I can’t imagine that any person pursuing such a high and noble office would have any real chance at getting the American people, regardless of party affiliation to support them.
Oh snap.
Posted by: Jason | September 19, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
“When has Barack Obama played the race card in this campaign? ”
Do some research other than dailykos and huffingtonpost.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
“described Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., as having urged Iraqi leaders in a private meeting to delay coming to an agreement with the Bush administration on the status of U.S. troops”
A PRIVATE MEETING -drop the water bucket Jake. Obama pulled the Iraqi leader aside and asked him IN PRIVATE
Posted by: geevill | September 19, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Let’s see….
“Just because I don’t look like the rest of the Presidents on the dollar bills…..”
“Oh, and by the way, he’s black…”
Obama is the one who constantly brings up his race on the trail as if he has been attacked when in fact, no attack has taken place.
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
hey hang, the racist name calling this is kinda like the boy who cried wolf at this point …
Posted by: Kitty | September 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
McCain: politics first – country second.
Posted by: Daniel Webster | September 19, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
mccain’s favorability is dropping like a rock. your god, palin, is already in the negatives.
Posted by: mm | September 19, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
The facts actually speak for theirself, to anyone who is actually being non partisan and listening to the issues, and that is you cannot believe anything that comes out of the mouth of McCain and Palin.
Posted by: Debbie | September 19, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
“I wouldn’t put anything past Obama-he went to Iraq already believing in his head he was President Obama.”
That is why this alibi is bogus. There was an offcial meeting and President Obama’s “Private” meeting.
Posted by: geevill | September 19, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Where is the proof that she used it for government business..the emails that were posted showed no evidence of that.
There is no justification for the hacker’s criminal activity, so please don’t try.
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
“A PRIVATE MEETING -drop the water bucket Jake. Obama pulled the Iraqi leader aside and asked him IN PRIVATE”
What say you, Jake, you partisan hack.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
“When has Barack Obama played the race card in this campaign?”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Where are Sarah Palin’s tax returns?!
Posted by: hang | September 19, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Obama is the one who uses paid bloggers, and also provides payment for a few other activities besides.
I am a 30-year registered Democrat who is not supporting my party’s candidate this election.
Any other accusations you would like to make???
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Debbie, no.
Posted by: hang | September 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Fpalings tax records are hidden just like her lying opinions from public view unless it is when she is blatthering to Sean !
Posted by: Debbie | September 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
McCain has lost his mind. His campaign is making things up to attack Senator Obama with…
The media needs to stop supporting out an out lies to be perpetuated.
They must stop running advertisements that include blatant lies. They must stop running articles based on blatant lies.
When the media participates in the perpectuation of lies. And let’s be honest we all know that once they are out there… they do not get cleaned up by recounting the facts. It helps a little bit but certainly not when a campaign has decided to win via lies and slander. They just keep telling the lies and running the ads.
The media is ‘being political’ when it accepts money for ads that include blatant lies no matter which party is doing it.
We as consumers of the media must start demanding that they act more responsibly and stop trying to play ‘innocent victims’ in their role.
McCain’s sex ad should have been rejected as unacceptable to run.
The american people need to actively participate in their relationship with the media as well as their relationship wwith their government.
Posted by: lb | September 19, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
wikileaks has the full inbox. eg.
“Meghan Stapleton
Attachments
FW: Motor Fuel Tax Suspension
Sat, 8/30/08 1169KB
Read
Ruaro, Randall P (GOV)
Draft letter to Governor Schwarzenegger / Container Tax
Thu, 8/28/08 12KB
Read ”
sounds like business to me …
Posted by: mm | September 19, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Sandy, Sandy, Sandy! How cute!!
Posted by: hang | September 19, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
“That is why this alibi is bogus. There was an offcial meeting and President Obama’s “Private” meeting.”
When can we expect a retraction for your poorly researched piece?
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
SandyB
Saying what McCain is going to do is far different from “playing the race card.
“Just because I don’t look like the rest of the Presidents on the dollar bills…..”
“Oh, and by the way, he’s black…”
Read the huffington post story and see who is the lair and who is laying the race card!
PS the race card only works if there is more blacks then whites…. PS America has more white then blacks!
Lucky that lots of those white folk like me look at the issues not the skin color of the candidate!
On the issues…. Barack gets my vote!
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
The Neocon lie machine is at it again. From the Post to the bloggoshphere to Limbaugh to Fox. The Mccain/Palin camp thrives on low down lies. I hope Obama whips his butt. This country cannot afford four years of two morons, like McCain and Palin, who speak freely about having a war with Russia – are they insane?
Posted by: strongboy | September 19, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
“When has Barack Obama played the race card in this campaign? You say he’s done it consistently, when has he done it once?”
Thanks for reminding me, I had almost forgotten about this littel gem:
“Nobody thinks that Bush and McCain have a real answer to the challenges we face. So what they’re going to try to do is make you scared of me,” Obama said. “You know, he’s not patriotic enough, he’s got a funny name, you know, he doesn’t look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills.”
It’s a little more subtle than when he used a more direct line against Hillary, “Did you know he’s black?” But it’s still clearly playing the race card. If you don’t see that, there’s no point in discussing it.
No one in McCain’s campaign has ever raised race as an issue. Not once. Obama was trying to puts words in the mouths of McCain’s staffers and he got stuffed on this one. We haven’t heard a peep since. This was not a proud moment for Barack.
Posted by: Woody | September 19, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
The McCain campaign is so sleazy. Do you think that if Obama would have been involved in something like the Savings and loan scandal the Republicans would have kept quiet? Well Obama may not say it, but I will, to those of you who think McCain/Palin is the ticket. Do some reasearch on the Keating Five. McCain should just shut up! Republicans care about abortion and taxes, but have no problem with corruption, as long as it is a Republican who is corrupt.
Posted by: Adrienne | September 19, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
the WP reporter (an Iranian) has also been called out a number of times already for unsubstantiated stories. This was a hatchet job from the word go. The Wp should be ashamed they ran the story without a confirmed source.
Posted by: Jason | September 19, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Ignorance is bliss…JUST ASK ANY REPUBLICAN!
Posted by: The Truth | September 19, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
to answer your question, it’s the same reason why Obama Campaign and the Media gave credence to all the Bull that they report about PALIN AND McCAIN BEFORE IT IS VERIFIED. YOU PEOPLE KILL ME WITH THIS CRAP. HOW MANY TIMES HAVE THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN AND THE MEDIA POUNCED ON INCORRECT INFORMATION IN REFERENCE TO MCCAIN AND PALIN AND THEN FIND OUT THAT IT IS NOT ACCURATE. WHY ARE YOU ACTING SHOCKED THAT THE MAN SAID “IF THIS IS TRUE” IT’S EGREGOUS?
Posted by: Kim | September 19, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
McCain has a character problem. What is revealed here again is McCain’s opportunistic and dishonest approach to politics. He would do anything to get attention and to get elected. For an insightful, well-researched view on McCain, I recommend to all a piece by Elizabeth Drew in Politico, September 17/08. Ms. Drew, who previously wrote a complimentary book about Sen. McCain (Citizen McCain, Simon & Schuster, 2002), now makes a stinging indictment of him. She writes, among others: “McCain”s recent conduct of his campaign”his willingness to lie repeatedly (including his acceptance speech) and to play Russian roulette with the vice-presidency, in order to fulfill his long-held ambition”has transformed earlier and growing sense that John McCain is not a principled man. In fact, it is not clear who he is.” On McCain”s surge politics, she writes: “In making a big issue of having backed the surge (and simplifying the reasons for its apparent success), he preempts debate on the very idea of the war. He has talked (and sung) loosely about attacking Iran. More recently, he oversimplified this summer”s events in Georgia and made intemperate remarks about Russia, about which he”s been more belligerent than the administration for some time. (He has his own set of neocons.).” Furthermore, She writes that there is “a disturbingly erratic side of McCain”s nature. There”s a certain lack of seriousness in him. And he does not appear to be a reflective man, or very interested in domestic issues. One cannot imagine him ruminating late into the night about, say, how to educate and train Americans for the new global and technological challenges.”
Posted by: Dr. Sam | September 19, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Even the Bush people have said McCain is not telling the truth. Are you now saying that your fearless leader Bush is a liar? Why dont we just stop all the nonsense and call all republics liars…We already know for a fact McCain, Palin and Bush are…need any more evidence?
Posted by: dean | September 19, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
Okay, so let me get this straight. Hagel, who was there, says it didn’t happen. The Bush administration official who was there says it didn’t happen. But a bunch of bloggers and the McCain camp, who were not there, say it happened.
Can’t you just go back to JFK conspiracies and let the rest of us alone?
Posted by: Ann | September 19, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
The Huffington Post???
Oh, please…………..
Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Barry is a liar. Caught red-handed attempting to make back door deals. We don’t need another Nixon.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Bada Bum Bum Bum, another one bites the dust.
Bye bye right wing lie!
Posted by: Ryan C | September 19, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
“The Huffington Post???
Oh, please…………..”
That’s where they get spoon-fed their talking points.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
The question is really why the Post published Taheri complete smear job, when Taheri is more discredited than James Frey!
Posted by: Sarah | September 19, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
You sick Republicans are lying and lying even calling Obama a liar about this when other, more responsible Republicans including Republicans in the Bush administration, are backing Obama’s story, which is the truth.
Posted by: Paul | September 19, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Mack
You wrote:
“Barry is a liar. Caught red-handed attempting to make back door deals. We don’t need another Nixon.”
Flash back 2007:
Mitt Romney compared rival John McCain with late President Richard Nixon
Thursday, accusing McCain of persistently misrepresenting Romney’s positions and flat out lying!
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
While it’s not true of all Repubicans, there are definitely those (including McCain) who are willing to peddle lies even when they’ve been refuted with supporting evidence. McCain has stooped to the level of those who ran attack ads against him in 2000 in SC. Good to know the type of administration McCain/Palin would have (one full of lies and deceit). We’ve had enough of that over the past 8 years.
OBAMA/BIDEN ’08
Posted by: LoriNC | September 19, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
We don’t need a Chicago thug in the Whitehouse. Lying and back door deals aren’t reform.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
when will mccain get back to the straight talk express
all his ads lately have been outrageous lies
his new spanish radio ad in florida is just pathetic
campaign before country!
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 19, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
You tube “McCain seal”,
an ad that mocked Barack Obama, with his face on $100 bill. Released before the statement you quote Woody.
Posted by: Woody | Sep 19, 2008 1:52:49 PM
Thanks for reminding me, I had almost forgotten about this littel gem:
“Nobody thinks that Bush and McCain have a real answer to the challenges we face. So what they’re going to try to do is make you scared of me,” Obama said. “You know, he’s not patriotic enough, he’s got a funny name, you know, he doesn’t look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills.”
It’s a little more subtle than when he used a more direct line against Hillary, “Did you know he’s black?” But it’s still clearly playing the race card. If you don’t see that, there’s no point in discussing it.
No one in McCain’s campaign has ever raised race as an issue. Not once. Obama was trying to puts words in the mouths of McCain’s staffers and he got stuffed on this one. We haven’t heard a peep since. This was not a proud moment for Barack.
Posted by: Charles | September 19, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
AGEISTS? Are you serious?
Its one thing to mock race and sex, those are constants; age is not, and unlike the other two it has a direct impact on the ability of an individual to effectively govern and perform to the mental, physical and cognitive capacities that the office demands of him or her. We all get old. We all retire. We all stop driving.
“Ageism” is such a dumb argument. It says a book full about a person’s lack of curiosity and familiarity with conempotary technologies and modern 21st Century issues when they can’t or don’t even want to learn how to use a computer.
Posted by: James | September 19, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
*contemporary
Posted by: James | September 19, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
When is the kernel going to pop? The story will be told with or without the MSM. probably without.
Posted by: geevill | September 19, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Another really bad move by McCain.
Again, it makes McCain look like a man who is extremely desperate and his lies get worse every day.
Republicans with integrity blast McCain for his repeated lies.
What frightens all Americans is McCain and Palin repeatedly violating the Commandment “Thou Shalt Not Lie”.
Posted by: Dan | September 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
“When is the kernel going to pop?”
Jake, Olbermann and Anderson Cooper are working on the spin as we speak.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Who should I believe? Everyone that was there with Obama, or someone who has a history of dishonesty?
Tough choice.
Posted by: AkaDad | September 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Andrew,
How is Obama going to give tax cuts to 95% of the people if 38% of the people don’t pay any taxes today? Take your time …
How can you believe this promise when Obama voted four times to repeal the Bush tax cuts? In other words, he voted four times to take your money out of your pocket. But hey, don’t let facts get in the way of a good love fest.
Posted by: Woody | September 19, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
“Who should I believe? Everyone that was there with Obama, or someone who has a history of dishonesty?”
Everyone wasn’t there, it was a private meeting. Open your eyes.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
The most charitable explanation I have for most of the comments posted here is that they didn’t read the article. Had the posters done so, they might actually have learned that the Whitehouse was fully represented in the meeting and that Sen. Obama did NOT in any way try to influence the Status of Forces Agreement. Further, Sen. Obama is completely correct that the Strategic Framework Agreement should be reviewed by Congress. It is only proper that the representatives of the People should review an agreement which will inform our relationship with Iraq on a going forward basis. Once again, the McCain campaign has completely distorted and misrepresented Sen. Obama’s position. Not that anyone should be surprised.
Posted by: Rhonda | September 19, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
“How can you believe this promise when Obama voted four times to repeal the Bush tax cuts? In other words, he voted four times to take your money out of your pocket. But hey, don’t let facts get in the way of a good love fest.”
Andrew be a true patriot and give your tax cut back like your overseer, Joe Biden, told you to do.
Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“How can you believe this promise when Obama voted four times to repeal the Bush tax cuts? In other words, he voted four times to take your money out of your pocket. But hey, don’t let facts get in the way of a good love fest.”
Who’s pocket are we talking about now?
Posted by: James | September 19, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“its no surprise that there are fears that the Republican Party might stoke racial tensions in their favor.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
“The best vote for ACTUAL Democrats is McCain/Palin.”
HA!
Obama had it right. John McCain doesn’t know whether he’s Barry Goldwater or Dennis Kucinich.
Posted by: James | September 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
“Frankly when you read stories in the news about what the GOP is doing in states with voter caging and 11th-hour legislative measures to enact voter restriction laws that disproportionately impact minority constituencies, as well as see the history of ads such as the Willie Horton ads, its no surprise that there are fears that the Republican Party might stoke racial tensions in their favor.”
You can fear all you want but your fears are unfounded. From Wiki: “there are no documented voter challenges based on caging lists in the 2004 elections”.
Are you telling me Democrats aren’t concerned about voter fraud? Do they have a problem with limiting legally registered voters to one vote? Do I have to bring up the voter fraud convictions of ACORN members? Actual convictions! And they’re doing it again but unforntunately it’s not getting a lot of play this time for whatever reason. Sorry, this issue cuts both ways as I’m sure you know.
Posted by: Woody | September 19, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
No, I’m sorry, I don’t buy Obama’s convenient explanation of this issue and it does warrant SERIOUS further investigation.
I am also continually shocked at the mindless Obama supporters who think Obama walks on water, above reproach, and then have the nerve to call McCain a liar. AS IF OBAMA HAS NOT ALREADY BEEN CAUGHT IN A TON OF LIES, including FISA, statements he’s made about Iran, his timeline for troop withdrawal, public campaign financing, etc. etc. etc.
McCain’s campaign is right to ask that this issue be fully investigated. As an American I demand that this be fully investigated. And no, we should not take Obama’s word on it, since he’s shown already that his “word” means NOTHING.
To copy the mindless Obama supporters here:
OBAMA = LIAR
MCCAIN IS A LEADER
Posted by: Hillary or Bust | September 19, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Woody
You asked:
“How is Obama going to give tax cuts to 95% of the people if 38% of the people don’t pay any taxes today?”
The 38% you talk about pay it through payroll tax and through day today taxes…
Do you every watch the news ?
Now I don’t mean Fake news on fox I mean a real news channel ?
The 38% you speak off get a check and they get access to the same health care senators get or cash to choose there own.
They get money for higher education cost in exchange for helping their communities.
95% of Americans get tax cuts under Obama!
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Of course voter fraud is a legitimate issue to pursue. I have a problem with how its conflated to be a bigger issue than it really is, and how it always seems to be on the state parties’ minds a couple months down the road from election day.
Posted by: James | September 19, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Chuck Bagel?
When is he going to announce for president? (day 553)
Excuse me but I’ll go with the Terhari articles.
Posted by: Captain America | September 19, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Andrew,
If McCain were somehow shown to be a racist he would lose in a landslide because (again, try to follow along) most people, including all those whites out there, find racism to be a base and intolerable sin against man. That’s how this smear would have benefitted Obama. That’s what he was trying to get away with. I can’t put it any plainer than that.
I never said Barack was a Muslim. He did, before Stephanopolous corrected him. I think it was an honest mistake.
Have a great weekend!
Posted by: Woody | September 19, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
It’s pretty clear.. another diversion tactic used by McCain.
Country first ??? I think he means McCain first.. My god, does he has no honor and proud. But then again… since his economic plans blew right in his face (remember Phil Gramm, we are a country of whiners) he has no issues more except smearing the other candidate.
Obama should run an add on this.
Posted by: clabs | September 19, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
They’re both liars. You are a damned fool if you believe for a minute you’re voting in the interest of truth and going to the ballots for a squeaky clean candidate.
The difference between me and you? I’ll be damned if I vote for a rubber stamp Republican after the worst eight years of this country’s life in modern history.
Posted by: James | September 19, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
If there had been any truth in this it would have come out long ago An Op-ed piece does not need to have actual facts in it. It is an Opinion. If he had dones so, Hagel and the rest of The republicans that were there would have know. Obama is not stupid. But, you can’t say the same for McCain. His camp really believes that there are some really stupid people out there. That will swallow every thing they say as truth. Even when they have been called out for lying so much in the last month or so.
Posted by: Iam4thisCountry | September 19, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Hillary or Bust
Hint: It’s BUST.
Posted by: Milton Freedman | September 19, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Woody
You have a great weekend too! : )
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
McCain camp. Open collective mouth and insert collective feet.
Posted by: Iam4thisCountry | September 19, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
James
I see more truth from Obama then McCain its all relative.
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
I wish all the so-called progressives accusing McCain of voter fraud in advance would pay attention and respond to all the serious, real, actual evidence of voter fraud that enabled Obama to overtake Hillary in the caucuses and then steal the nomination.
But no, Obama supporters don’t care about voter fraud when it supports THEIR guy.
Posted by: Hillary or Bust | September 19, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
This is very poorly researched;
The Strategic Framework Agreement IS the agreement that would concern troop drawdown. The status of forces (SOFA to the troops on the ground) indeed deals with the legal status of U.S. troops in country.
IF Barack asked that the Strategic Framework Agreement be delayed, he did indeed ask that an agreement on troop withdrawal be delayed. That is a fact. Whether or not Hagel or anyone else agrees that it should be subject to congressional review.
The fact is that Barack is asking for a delay in the agreement that would describe the conditions for and resulting troop levels of a drawdown. This fact is apparently not in dispute by anyone, and is direct evidence that he did attempt to cause our troop withdrawel to be delayed for a period of at least a year.
Who’s in the tank for who here?
Bob
Posted by: Bob Kutz | September 19, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Hillary or Bust
Psss did you know ??
Hillary is voting for Obama….
Hillary will be the first woman president.
Obama is the man for this election!
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Perhaps the McCain camp did not ask the Republicans who traveled with Obama what happened because they can’t be trusted.
Posted by: paulejb | September 19, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
So pathetic to see McCains camp flail around blindly. So very sad to see McCain sell any hint of integrity and self respect for the faint chance to be president.
Sadly he has no chance poor ole fella.
Posted by: mike | September 19, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
THE MEDIA IS SOOOO BIASED. Waaaaaaaa.
Any story that doesn’t accuse Obama of some evil doing must be biased. Couldn’t be that the stories are just complete BS made up by haters and Republican clowns. No, it must always be the “liberal” media
Since when did the GOP start whining so much anyway?
Jesus, just watch FOX if you want Republican cheerleaders.
Posted by: Kynes | September 19, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
I’m confused. Didn’t Scheunemann just say “published reports say” and “if the reports are accurate…”? So they weren’t jumping to any conclusions. And weren’t expressing any “outrage.” This is a total non-story. Once again.
Posted by: Mojo | September 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Haha, yes, you mean the .0035% of Obama’s total contributions that Freddie and Fannie workers have contributed.
Wow that is really some special interest money rolling in. We better watch out for the .0035% sway to the special interests of Freddie and Fannie that these have on Obama’s agenda as POTUS.
Posted by: ebolaman | September 19, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
re: jake
“What actually demands an explanation is why the McCain campaign was so willing to give credence to such a questionable story with such tremendous international implications without first talking to Republicans present at Obama’s meeting with Maliki, who back Obama’s version of the meeting and completely dismiss the Post column as untrue.
McCain & Co. are a long way from being concerned about what’s true…
I heard a McCain spokesperson, Nancy Pfotenhauer say today on MSNBC during an interview that the McCain campaign will say anything that has been reported in the news anywhere that’s anti Obama, they don’t have to check whether it’s true or not…as long as it’s printed they will repeat it as ‘truth’.
at least they’re admitting the fact that it’s all lies…
Posted by: Jazzman | September 19, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
.587% of Obama’s money came from the US Air Force…
Well people who work for the US Air Force….
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
It is always amazing to me how folks seems to forget from one blog to the next what they have said. This morning I read how Sen Obama was really on top of this economic thing and was having a meeting with all kinds of Heavy Weight Economic guru’s then he comes out and says I am not saying anything until the administration and the congress have completed their work. Well I guess my question is ISN’T HE A MEMBER OF CONGRESS? I guess if I was a member of congress and had just met with a whole bunch of big headed folks on the economy I would have at least put together a position to start from. Where and what is his position or is he again waiting for someone else to take the stand and then come out with add on’s to that plan like he did with Hillary and also with McCain.
GOOD CHANGE FOR THE COUNTRY RIGHT?
Posted by: Charlie | September 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
What did Sarah Palin say in her meeting with Iraqi leaders? Sorry, I forgot she’s never been to Iraq.
Posted by: Boris | September 19, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
“McCain & Co. are a long way from being concerned about what’s true…”
Oh, right, and Obama is the MODEL of honesty and integrity. GIMME A BREAK! Even his own supporters started up a group in outcry over Obama’s huge betrayal on FISA.
So it’s perfectly OK for Obama to put out an ad claiming that McCain is clueless about email when the facts are that McCain DOES use email, he just has to have someone else type for him due to war injuries.
Obama stoops to ageism and outright lies against McCain and Palin CONSTANTLY. For two weeks Obama’s team ran an Internet whisper campaign slandering Palin.
What hypocrisy from Obama supporters.
Posted by: Hillary or Bust | September 19, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
What, McCain, Republicans, right wing blogs and talk radio lying about Obama?
Lying about Iraq? Well, I never!
Posted by: ricky | September 19, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“he just has to have someone else type for him due to war injuries.”
Okay, I didn’t even know that but that’s just as bad. He can’t even flipping type, not even with a keyboard on his lap? Come on, I don’t have sympathy for that crap.
“Obama stoops to ageism and outright lies against McCain and Palin CONSTANTLY. For two weeks Obama’s team ran an Internet whisper campaign slandering Palin.”
Where’s your proof? Seriously.
Posted by: ebolaman | September 19, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Charlie,
McCain came out and “announced” exactly what Barack said yesterday! Obama came out explained whats happening told America his priorities and stated how his tax plan will help the economy. He stated his support for the fed plan and said he is in favor of getting more money into the hands of middle America.
Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
People quit bellyaching about Jake.
He has reported when Obama might have been fudging about quitting smoking.
He has pointed out stupid things Joe Biden says about football. Pointing out McCain lying about a presidential candidate’s position about a place he thinks is OK to occupy for another 100 years with out troops is moree minor stuff. Lighten up.
Posted by: ricky | September 19, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
I notice the usual suspects are laying low on Palin today. I wonder why. Pop goes the Kernell.
———————–
Well, she can see a bank from her house in Alaska. And, as we’ve seen, banks are a key factor in our economy.
So, by living so close to bank, by Republican standards, Palin has domestic economic credentials.
FEEL BETTER?
Posted by: Truth Hurts the GOP | September 19, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
“If McCain can use a phone he has no excuse not to use a computer.”
That’s total BS. I know a young woman who has severe carpal tunnel and she cannot use a keyboard whatsoever but she still can hold a cellphone.
How old are you guys anyway? 19? That you can’t have compassion for someone who had has fingers broken is absolutely pathetic. The definition of a sociopath is someone who has no conscience or caring for another human being’s pain. Even if you don’t like McCain’s politics you should respect the fact that he has a physical disability.
And what does it matter anyway whether he actually does his own typing? CEOs have for decades used dictation and secretaries to type for them. The ability to type has NOTHING to do whatsoever with the ability to understand the Internet, technology, and its implications.
So you guys are fighting a losing battle on this one. Obama’s ad was poorly researched, and it insulted vets, old people, and the disabled. Good going, Team Obama!
Posted by: Hillary or Bust | September 19, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Hagel’s a Republican? Well, sure… he’s been self-identifying that way, but if you actually listen to what he’s said…
Posted by: ME | September 19, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Woody,
You are probably not going to read this, but race card does not work for a black candidate. The race card does not gain enough white sympathy or white guilt votes to offset the white voters angered by the race card. Barack Obama knows this, and so does John McCain. Obama was bending over backward trying not to run as a black candidate. Black candidates running as black candidates do not win national elections. Unfortunately for him, his opponents kept implying that he was winning only because he’s a black candidate, and when he complained they accused him of raising the race card. Think about this. If Hillary’s opponents had said that she was the leading Democratic candidate (before Obama started winning primaries and caucuses, of course) only because she is a woman or she is married to Bill, don’t you think Hillary would be crying sexism?
Posted by: anthony | September 19, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
If your brain can’t make your lips and tongue form the words,”President Palin”,and your lungs won’t give you any air to blow it through your larynx and out of your mouth and into the air,then VOTE FOR OBAMA.
Posted by: Passenger57 | September 19, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Kudos Jake…
Thanks for the clarification, and thanks even more for treating the Republicans and Democrats equally. At least here we are given enough information to form our own opinions and are not treated as dolts who need to be told what to think.
Posted by: Dave | September 19, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“If your brain can’t make your lips and tongue form the words,”President Palin” … “
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Isn’t Hagel the Republican who was bandied about as a possible VP pick for Obama? hasn’t he been opposed to the war and to President Bush? Why wouldn’t he defend Obama? Are we just supposed to take their word for it?
Posted by: Chris | September 19, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
“Hagel’s a Republican? Well, sure… he’s been self-identifying that way, but if you actually listen to what he’s said”
Hagel has been a principled conservative Republican for decades.
I don’t agree with many of his views but to snidely refer to him as RINO shows you have little clue about the man or his record.
Its funny that the 2nd he points out reality, delusional right wingers reject him.
Same thing happened when principled Republicans thought Bush was a bad idea.
Look where that has gotten the Republican party.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 19, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Obama has consistently shown far better judgment than McCain and this is just another example.
If you read their backgrounds it makes sense. Obama was the president of the Harvard Law Review, earned a professional doctorate in law, and graduated magna cum laude. On the other side, McCain graduated at the bottom of his class, and Palin brags about getting a D in macroeconomics…
Posted by: April | September 19, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Any McCain supporters here to explain their candidates boneheadedness?? Or just attack Obama?? lmao.
Posted by: The Oracle | September 19, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
“Isn’t Hagel the Republican who was bandied about as a possible VP pick for Obama? hasn’t he been opposed to the war and to President Bush? Why wouldn’t he defend Obama?”
This is sad. Hagel did oppose the Iraq War. Same as he opposed the war in Kosovo. He views it as the wrong mission for the military. He has not opposed Bush much beyond the issue of the war.
That he comes out to correct the record vs dangerous propaganda is a testament to his statemanship over partisanship.
“Are we just supposed to take their word for it?”
So you accept the word of a writer who has been proven to pass on outright lies (he infamously wrote that Iran had started making Jews wear stars on their clothing, a sickening replay of the Holocaust only it never happened) vs a principled Senator?
Gotta love right wing logic.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 19, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
“President Palin would be fine.
President McCain will be fine.”
Please tell me you’re a felon and can’t vote…..
Posted by: The Oracle | September 19, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Zaggs, don’t you think that if Obama had violated the Logan Act, it would have made FRONT PAGE NEWS IN EVERY OUTLET AT THE TIME OF HIS TRIP OVERSEAS??? Your ignorance and gullibility is laughable. You Republicans’ ability to spread and believe lies with such ease, is scary, in the least.
Posted by: sheribaby | September 19, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
If Obama was only trying to delay the Strategic Framework Agreement, then why does the article from NBC on June 16, 2008 seem to indicate otherwise? “Obama also told Zebari, he said, that Congress should be involved in any negotiations regarding a Status of Forces agreement with Iraq. He suggested it may be better to wait until the next administration to negotiate such an agreement.” I understand that this was from a phone conversation before the visit, but it still indicates that Obama wanted the Status of Forces agreement delayed, not just the Strategic Framework Agreement.
Posted by: Mag K | September 19, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
“The Strategic Framework Agreement is a document that generally describes what the relationship between the two countries should look like over time.”
That is quite weak, Jake.
It appears that the SOFA does indeed affect the withdrawal schedule and that substantially, a delay in approviing it delays the withdrawal.
“SECRETARY RICE: Well, we have always said that the roles, missions, and size of the American forces here, the coalition forces, was based on the conditions on the ground and what is needed. We have agreed that some goals, some aspirational timetables for how that might unfold are well worth having in such an agreement.”
FOREIGN MINISTER ZEBARI: I would just add really that this agreement determines the principal provisions, requirements to regulate the temporary presence and the time horizon, the mission of the U.S. forces. I mean, this is the scope of this agreement. So we are talking about time horizon. And this is a sign of confidence in the Iraqi military and security that they are overtaking more and more responsibility and they’re showing more self-reliance and professionalism in combating terrorism and dealing with internal threats. So because the agreement has not been signed and finalized, really, won’t be able — at least I won’t be able to give you any specific dates. But yes, indeed, we have discussed very seriously, negotiated about the time horizons that is important for us and for the U.S. forces.
Posted by: len | September 19, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
If you grow up in Hawaii , raised by your grandparents, you’re “exotic, different.
”
Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, a quintessential American story.
If your name is Barack you’re a radical, unpatriotic Muslim.
Name your kids Willow , Trig and Track, you’re a maverick.
Graduate from Harvard law School and you are unstable.
Attend 5 different small colleges before graduating, you’re well grounded.
If you spend 3 years as a brilliant community organizer, become the first black President of the Harvard Law Review, create a voter registration drive that registers 150,000 new voters, spend 12 years as a Constitutional Law professor, spend 8 years as a State Senator representing a district with over 750,000 people, become chairman of the state Senate’s Health and Human Services committee, spend 4 years in the United States Senate representing a state of 13 million people while sponsoring 131 bills and serving of the Foreign Affairs, Environment and Public Works and Veteran’s Affairs committees, you don’t have any real leadership experience.
If your total resume is: local weather girl, 4 years on the city council and 6 years as the mayor of a town with less than 7,000 people, 20 months as the governor of a state with only 650,000 people, then you’re qualified to become the country’s second highest ranking executive and next in line behind a man in his eighth decade.
If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you’re not a real Christian.
If you cheated on your first wife with a rich heiress,and then left your disfigured wife and married the heiress the next month, you’re a true Christian.
If you teach responsible, age appropriate sex education, including the proper use of birth control, you are eroding the fiber of society.
If, while governor, you staunchly advocate abstinence only, with no other option in sex education in your state’s school system while your unwed teen daughter ends up pregnant, you’re very responsible.
If your wife is a Harvard graduate laywer who gave up a position in a prestigious law firm to work for the betterment of her inner city community, then gave that up to raise a family, your family’s values don’t represent America ‘s.
If you’re husband is nicknamed “First Dude”, with at least one DWI conviction and no college education, who didn’t register to vote until age 25 and once was a member of a group that advocated the secession of Alaska from the USA, your family is extremely admirable.
Posted by: Emily | September 19, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Emily, I’m not even going to bother with the rest of your Obamaganda piece, but this line is over the top:
“If you have been married to the same woman for 19 years while raising 2 beautiful daughters, all within Protestant churches, you’re not a real Christian.”
Riiiight. Trinity and Rev. Wright are mainline Protestant churches…much in the same way the Heaven’s Gate people were just normal, every day new agers.
Obama goes to a church where black supremacy is actively taught, where anti-American hate is spewed, and you think this is a plus?
You would have done better sticking to your starry-eyed review of Obama’s so-called “brilliance” as a community organizer.
Oh, and BTW, you forgot to mention voter disenfranchisement and voter fraud among your list of Obama accomplishments. It’s easy to register 150,000 new voters when half of them are dead or under the age of 5. (See ACORN.)
Posted by: Hillary or Bust | September 19, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
JAKE – you have got to be kidding. Mccain needs to explain himself why his campaign was so quick to believe the Post story????? that is funny! he doesn’t have the luxury of having the media look out for him 24/7 like Obama. It’s not like you guys jumped on the issue right away to either confirm or deny. Start doing your work and be even-handed about how you all cover this campaign.
Oh, and why you are at it. Why don’t you do a report on ABC Evening News about the horrible Obama Spanish ad that plays on racial tensions?? Amazing how the press has left this one alone. Shame, shame!
Posted by: haha | September 19, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I just don’t understand why more disgust like this from the McCain camp isn’t getting more attention from the press. Someone seriously needs to bring up THE KEATING FIVE!
Posted by: Gia | September 19, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Jake,
Did you read any of Taheri’s follow ups? NBC quoted Obama at the time as referring to the SOFA not the SFA.
Posted by: John | September 19, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
When are the lies going to stop?
This is getting ridiculous.
Posted by: jc | September 19, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Ask his fellow Republicans? Why, that would require McCain to pull his head out of his @ss!
And as we all know, due to certain injuries he sustained as a POW, POW, POW, that is just not physically possible anymore.
You’re being so unfair!
Posted by: Bill in Chicago | September 19, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
For all you people convinced that the idiots putzes that busted into Gov. Palin’s unsecure yahoo account by answering a simple question that any dolt could figure out by reading a biography of her, are connected with some nefarious plot with direct connections to Obama, please answer me one question.
Why if they indeed planned this, I suppose , in order to find ‘dirt’ would they post the bloody evidence on the internet where automatic partisan suspicion would fall on them? No one seems to have a logical answer to that part of this conspiracy? Why was it all posted?
Posted by: kayla | September 19, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
“For all you people convinced that the idiots putzes that busted into Gov. Palin’s unsecure yahoo account by answering a simple question that any dolt could figure out by reading a biography of her, are connected with some nefarious plot with direct connections to Obama, please answer me one question.”
Sounds to me like the kid was just being an idiot. It is somewhat fishy that his father happen to be a Democratic Representative active in Obama’s campaign, but I’m thinking it’s probably just a dumb college kid doing what college kids do at that age: do stupid, rash things. Sadly for him, he’s going to pay for this in a very serious way.
Posted by: Hillary or Bust | September 19, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
to all those republicans who kept trying to push this story as if there was something to hide
saw another story about mccain trying to get maliki out of government
hmmmmm
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 19, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
How much does the RNC pay these jerks to make their comments? Hate and sarcasm is all they’ve got. Their investment accounts are crashing, so perhaps they’ll have to find jobs. The only way the right has stayed in power is through the lying corporate media, rigged voting machines, voter suppression, caging, etc. But as the ship sinks from their deregulated financial markets, we’re all going down together.
Posted by: Totto | September 19, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Chuck Hagel may be the only Republican who keeps his job!
Actually, I think we’re going to see a lot of this very soon. Repubs (and journos) who wish to save their own skin will be standing up for TRUTH
Posted by: Kelly | September 19, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Wasn’t it the Post who also reported the false “Raines” story 3 TIMES? The one that on which the McC campaign based another lying ad.
Posted by: lynne | September 19, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
“Obama did assert at the meeting with the Iraqis that he agrees with those – including Hagel and Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., the ranking Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee — who advocate congressional review of the Strategic Framework Agreement being worked out between the Bush administration and the Iraqi government, including the Iraqi parliament.”
So he did try to unilaterally involve himself in foreign diplomacy and undermine the Administration, but not on the agreement initially claimed?
Good defense.
Is only the SFA covered by the Logan act, and the SOFA is a free for all for anyone to try to impair the Administration’s negotiations with Iraq?
I’m just curious how this absolves him.
Posted by: Ertdfg | September 19, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
@Bhrandon
I agree and if it is who people say it is I do think he should be punished. I just can’t see how if this was some sort of Obama operation why it would get posted where everyone could find out. That part makes no sense.
Also for those pushing it to become a big inquiry have you considered that maybe one of the reason the McCain campaign isn’t going balistic over it is because that regardless of the criminal aspects it also paints Palin in a bad light for doing government business on one of the most insecure email sites out there? Which if that was never an issue in the first place those addresses wouldn’t have been published in the news and we’d likely not be talking about this at all right now? This potentially could harm BOTH campaigns not just the Dems.
And as some one who still would really like to vote Republican it would be much appreciated if people could just calm, think a bit and look how it could play for out Palin and McCain as well. (there are negatives) I think the perps should be punished most definatly and I trust that the investigation will lead to whether there’s something more nefarious then just an idiot and if that is the case, then freak out.
Posted by: kayla | September 19, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Thank you for this forthright report, Mr. Tapper. It makes clear, once again, that John McCain will say and do anything to win. In this case, he recklessly endorsed a lie that he could have fact-checked. Where’s the integrity and patriotism in that?
Posted by: NER | September 19, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
It is interesting that Jake would repute this story based on a deflected Repub, but not based on the words from Iraq foreign Minister, who talked and listened directly to Obama. The very fact that it took so many days for ABC to start reporting on this, and immediately used some one’s words to say McCain’s campaign statement, there is something fishy here. Why ABC didn’t comment on this before, McCain campaign only posed on aquestion: is this is true, then Obama’s behavior is not acceptable. This is an apparent ABC’s help trying to dampen down a potentially explosive issue. Remember a TV ad is already out calling Obama on this. BUt there is not a single MSM source questioning it. They don’t want to call people’s attention to it. The problem it, no matter how you can spin this, many people believe Obama tried to stall troop withdrawal by asking Iraqis to delay the negotiation. The reporter of NYP showed Fox news of the Iraq FM’s full interview quotes published in a newspaper.
Posted by: amy | September 19, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
The answer to the question in the final paragraph of the article is simple: The McCain campaign ran with the story before checking it out because (a) it makes good political fodder and (b) they have zero integrity.
Posted by: Virto | September 19, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Thank you for these facts and the logical analysis.
Posted by: atd | September 19, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Matt Drudge must feel particularly proud of himself. He tried for a whole day and a half to get news organizations to bite on this as some sort of proof that Senator Obama is unpatriotic. Matt – you’re a moron.
Posted by: babs101 | September 19, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
Wow. People are really upset here…They’re jumping all over the “Hagel said” angle and crying “he’s a sellout!”….Let’s see. We have an official visit and the News Corp faithful want us to believe that Obama had “a private meeting” within an official visit while the Bush dept just watched??..like the Bush team was not in the room??….Oh wait. I forgot. That’s the plan!…We’re ALL suppose to forget that Bush was in the room during the last 8 years…Reform! Reform! Fire Chris Cox! —– Rats.
Posted by: TruthHurts | September 19, 2008, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Jake,
Are you serious? Maybe if the media would start doing their job with respect to Obama things might be different!! Obama’s quotes from NBC in July tell you that this story is real!! Why are you reporting this BS now, 1 week later? Oh that’s right it’s against McCain not Obama?Soetoro!!
You guy’s are pathetic!!
2008,..the death of journalism!!
Posted by: jerry | September 19, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
This is disturbing. I am becoming increasingly turned off by the lies, absence of facts, and/or distortions BOTH campaigns are using. It is at the point, that when I go to a news site, I need to google every article just to see if I can ink out the truth. This is unfair to the citizens of the US. Is journalistic integrity dead?
Posted by: stephanie | September 19, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
When Shueneman says “if news reports are accurate…” doesn’t that remind you of when Cheney said, “it’s in the New York Times, Sadam is trying to aquire…”
The have their buddy, writer of many other false stories, Taheri, write this story, and then go out there and say, “these reports are troubling”.
The smells like a Bill Kristol operation.
Posted by: a reader | September 19, 2008, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Scheunemann continued. “Senator Obama needs to reveal what he said to Iraq’s Foreign Minister during their closed door meeting.”
He did and now looks even more presidential than before the McCain camp took this most unpresidential swipe at him based on falsehood and distortion.
Posted by: Jim Reynolds | September 19, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
well you definitely have your sources to clear Obama. A Democrat and Hagel (quasi Republican – who was against the Iraq war and who is being considered for a position in the Obama Adminstration). Try and do better than that if your going to say Taheri is a liar.
Posted by: Leed | September 19, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
If this was true at that time Bush would have raised the dead and parted the Red Sea. The media is not reporting the correct version until people get bent out of shape and start responding with votes against Obama. Seems like they are inadvertently trying to sink Obama by allowing misinformation to hover in the air long enough for it to take on a negative effect. I second the motion, the media is a pathetic group of people.
Posted by: keepitreal50 | September 19, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
To Stephanie: The lies and untruths are coming out of the McCain camp not Obamas. Sorry girlfriend
Posted by: empi | September 19, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I wrote back to ertdfg about the difference between the Strategic Framework Agreement and the Status of Forces Agreement. The SFA is akin to a TREATY and is being submitted in Iraq to their parliament. If you understand anything about Constitutional law here, treaties are ALSO supposed to be submitted to our Congress. Bush has tried to circumvent that process by calling it an Agreement, but Obama was merely echoing the position taken by prominent lawmakers on both sides of the aisle that it is, in reality, a treaty. And since Bush administration high ranking officials were at the meeting (Obama did not meet with anyone privately) and the Bush team is no friend to Obama, clearly they would been screaming like crazy if Obama had directly contradicted the Administration’s position to the leader of Iraq. The other agreement on Status of Forces, is seen more as a commander-in-chief type agreement that has to do with deployment of troops. While there is debate about this, too, again Bush’s team would have still been crying foul had Obama undermined their position right in front of them.
The second point I made to Hillary or Bust is that I know quadriplegics who use the computer, a LOT, I think McCain can’t possibly be so disabled as to make that impossible for him. And McCain’s lack of use or understanding of the computer is important. How can he understand the nuances and implications of an integral part of our global economic and information community if he has no real practical understanding of it.
Posted by: Kate Mom of Twins | September 19, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
McBush’s increasing tone of desperation is evident in his resorting to more and more outlandish lies. Pretty soon McCain is going start running naked in streets screaming Obama is a Martian.
Posted by: Johan | September 19, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
liars, liars, liars, liars, liars, liars, liars …
What are we to do? They put out bare-faced INCREDIBLE lies, and then turn around and suggest that Democrats are liars (hey, Dems do occasionally tell one, or stretch a fact, too, but they have NOT gone to the lengths that the Republicans have — they just have NOT).
Republicans are brazen. They want the White House for four more years. They want to continue the dismemberment of our government through behind the scenes machinations, quiet presidential edicts, and keeping all their deliberations secret. There’s money to be made and power to be had and they WILL have it!
These are crazy-making times. Crazy-making.
Posted by: pgobrien | September 19, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
John McCain really lies alot. After what he did delaying or stopping the legal and fair legislative investigation against Sarah Palin as governor of Alaska this man is one of most dishonest politicians I have followed during a campaign. Truth and honesty lost. Sarah Palin innocent or guilty lost!! And there is evidence already taken that reveals pressure was exerted to fire her brother inlaw!! May her brother inlaw is a problem, but he needed to be addressed legally, not by internally applying pressure, investigating him, pressuring Police Commissioner(evidence of one phone conversation and two email proving pressure released to public) McCain and Palin both LIE – AND PROVEN WITH FACT CHECK, ANALYSTS, NEW REPORTS.
This is just another example of just another big lie!!!
Posted by: Sharonklim | September 19, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
That’s because McCain is a liar. He will do and say anything to get elected. Period. This man has sunk so low that he has to look up to see the floor. Thanks but no thanks, I don’t want that kind of president ever again.
Posted by: judesuper | September 19, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Hi Emily. I am delighted to see Tim Wise’s White Privilege column is making the rounds and people are posting it. It’s about time people wake up
Thanks for posting it
Posted by: empi | September 19, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Hmm, that’s weird, because this sounds like exactly what McCain has said in the ad. Any decision put off regarding troops would mean that they would stay longer. He might want to have a conversation with his National Security Spokesperson.
“In fact, Obama had told the Iraqis that they should not rush through a “Strategic Framework Agreement” governing the future of US forces until after President George W. Bush leaves office,” she said.
Posted by: Kurt C. | September 19, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Don’t be stupid – if Obama did this it would bave been front page news the minute he landed. Instead, he gets the “celebrity ad” If they had had red meat, they would have barbequed him!
Posted by: Fiona | September 19, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Ummm … We’re talking about two separate meetings, Jake. The one where Obama suggested that the Iraqis delay signing the SOF agreement until after the election was with Foreign Minister Zebari. The one where Hegel and Crocker were in attendance was with Prime Minister Maliki.
Pretty sloppy journalism there, bud.
Posted by: Dan | September 19, 2008, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
“” According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.”
“”He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview.”
______________
A lot of this information has disappeared……. …. but there are still small patches of truth around.
If Obama had not said these things, why has he taken so long to deny them?
And why doesn’t he call Zebari a liar to his face?
hmmmmmmmmm?
Posted by: HMMMMMMM | September 19, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
McCain’s campaign taking it’s primary source from the NY Post is a really clear indication of how uncommitted to researching the facts the McSame camp really is.
Posted by: Shelly | September 19, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
Follow the money $66 million for August and look at the polls. The American people have said ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! This financial meltdown was the final straw. The GOP is Done. Stick a fork in them!
Posted by: julescator | September 19, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
Many of the posts on here are an awesome tribute to WILLFUL IGNORANCE:it’s alive and well. READ THE ARTICLE PEOPLE, it says Republicans WHO WERE THERE agree with Obama, he didn’t ask for troop withdrawls to be delayed. What a surprise, McCain’s campaign again LIED to try to score political points. It’s amazing that people are still to choosing to believe lies like this one. As I said, an awesome tribute to willful ignorance in the American public.
Posted by: jon in maryland | September 19, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Follow the money $66 million for August and look at the polls. The American people have said ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! This financial meltdown was the final straw. The GOP is Done. Stick a fork in them!
Posted by: julescator | September 19, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
McCain is in panic mode. Reminds me of Bush 41 when he stooped to calling Clinton and Gore”bozos” McCain has sunk so low he could play handball off the curb. And he looks like an old Charlie Chaplin. (sorry, Charlie.)
Posted by: doug | September 19, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
McCain is in panic mode. Reminds me of Bush 41 when he stooped to calling Clinton and Gore”bozos” McCain has sunk so low he could play handball off the curb. And he looks like an old Charlie Chaplin. (sorry, Charlie.)
Posted by: doug | September 19, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Why no comments from Crocker and US Embassy officials in Iraq about what happened? Why instead the quotes from unidentified Bush Admin people, who say that if the story were true then Crocker would have said something? Why not just go to the people who were there, Crocker and the embassy people? Furthermore, who is the unidentified Bush Admin person with knowledge of the meeting? And what kind of knowledge? Firsthand? Hearsay? A briefing? What? And why are unidentified sources, who may or may not have been there, being used to describe what Obama supposedly said? Who are these people being quoted? From my reading of the story, only one unidentified source was at the meeting, and who knows what that person was doing there? Was that person part of Obama’s entourage or somebody else’s? This exoneration raises more questions than it answers.
Posted by: dave | September 19, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
“Obama’s increasing tone of desperation is evident in his resorting to more and more outlandish lies. Pretty soon he is going start running naked in streets screaming McCain is a Martian.
Posted by: johan | September 19, 2008, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
So my question is, if big ‘O” insisted that any policy matters be left up to the current administration, WHY WAS HE AT THIS MEETING IN THE FIRST PLACE? I think we all know that he was going for a little ‘face time’ to look like he was strong on foreign policy and relations. If he deferred to the Bush Administration in that meeting, seems to me that he had no real purpose in being there. Hmmmmmm…
Posted by: Blake | September 19, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
and didn’t Obama have an “unauthorized”policy talk”( wink wink) with the Canadians about Nafta….one of those double speak conversations that say “I say” but “I MEAN….”.
You have to forgive the dear;
Sometimes his ego… and his ears… get tangled in his tonsils and he just can’t control what’s going to come tumbling out!
Sometimes it’s “ummm, err, hnn, ehhh”..
Sometimes, it’s just lies!
Posted by: truth talking | September 19, 2008, 6:46 pm 6:46 pm
Funny! Once again, the Bush administration is having to distance itself from the McCain campaign. Who would have guessed that the McCain ticket would become such an embarrassment with their lies/gaffes that Bush would not want to be associated with them.
Posted by: Andy | September 19, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
OK. Let’s look at this logically. Forget about the legality issues and just look at the hypocrisy claim. According to the National Center for Policy Analysis, Obama wants to withdraw troops within 16 months. If he wants Congressional approval for the Strategic Framework Agreement(the document that actually covers troop withdrawl) in addition to the approval of the Iraqi parliament, isn’t that kind of approval going to take at least a year after the next President takes office? Doesn’t that eat up your 16 months right there? Is this accurate? How long do you believe the approval process will take realistically and how long will the troop withdrawl itself take realistically?
Posted by: Mag K | September 19, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Drudge gave Amir more then 24 hours on the front page of the Drudge. Its amazing that this writer gets any attention at all. The neo conservatives support this guy. Its not surprising that the campaign of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., seized upon a column written by Amir. Look whos running McCain’s campaign Schmidt/Rove. Schmidt’s war room must have been gloating again with their latest spin.
Posted by: Frank | September 19, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
There really ought to be a MINIMUM IQ & a MINIMUM GPA for anyone seeking the office of the President of the United States…. (Oh, but wait a minute, that surely would have disqualified our current Administration that has promoted the “Smart to be Dumb” image!) Instead of voting for someone we can “relate to”/ “the guy next door”, why do we not vote for someone MORE INTELLIGENT than ourselves? Many job applications require submission of one’s COLLEGE TRANSCRIPT and we certainly would not be admitted to a prestigious University with merely average or below average grades…. So, when the problems that face our nation (e.g, economically, etc.) are so serious, WHY would we be willing to hire the incapable??? Barack Obama is an impressive individual, not only intellectually but with obvious capability to apply his gifts in a level headed manner. I am SO tired of hearing politicians (e.g., Bush, McCain, etc.) BRAGGING about their mediocre grades and low ranking in class….. while I try to motivate my college age kids to STRIVE FOR EXCELLENCE!
Posted by: Bonita Chambers | September 19, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
All all people, the McCain campaign should have known that anything printed in a newspaper that’s related to politics has a high probability of being inaccurate.
Posted by: Neil | September 19, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
This is outrageous. Why don’t you cover all this stuff on World News Tonight? Americans need to know the TRUTH whatever that may be. They deserve to know the TRUTH fromt the Media. Think about your country. It’s great to write this up here but this stuff needs to be on the National News broadcast. On either side of the aisle. NO MORE LIES.
Posted by: Lisa | September 19, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
the TRUTH will OUT…..
but it won’t be in this bloated B O blog!
Calling McCain a liar, Calling Hillary a liar, Calling anyone who is against B O a liar AND a racist….. is … I hate to say it… but… here goes….
is like the pot calling the kettle black ‘=).
I’m from Illinois and I KNOW what Obama didn’t do for his constituents and I KNOW what he did to his competition and I KNOW how he built his lists of supporters to push him up the political ladder…..
I KNOW what it feels like to have the highest sales taxes in the country and I KNOW what an unfinished low-rent housing development begun during his first reign as a state senator and still inhabitable after all these years…I KNOW what it looks like!
And …. he’s just not my cup of tea!
So by by…….. watch B O bleed us dry….
Be careful, though.
Be very very careful!
delete delete delete delete delete
Posted by: truth talking | September 19, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Hagel is not a credible source. Neither is anyone from State. Nice try though.
Posted by: Joanne600 | September 19, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
The possibility exists that both sides are telling the truth about the meeting in Iraq. It is entirely possible that the native english speakers in the room understood Obama to mean “Hey guys, we should really run this by Congress, especially since Bush won’t be president by the time it’s enacted,” while the Iraqis there (possibly listening through translators and until recently living in a brutal dictatorship) understood him to mean “Bush won’t be around forever, so you jerks better not screw me.” There is no true understanding across a language barrier.
Posted by: James C. Bennett | September 19, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Really, are you all serious? A man who was not there is not a credible source?
LMAO!!!
You wingnuts tinfoil hat much? Even the White House said it was not true.
Posted by: thestormofwar | September 19, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Amar Taheri has been accused of making up news stories on multiple occasions. He has had his stories retracted several times as well.
For example:
He alleged that Iran’s UN ambassador, Javad Zarif, was one of the students involved in the 1979 hostage crisis at the US embassy in Tehran. In fact, Zarif was living in San Francisco at the time, attending SF State.
Taheri is a paid liar. If Obama’s campaign had any sense, they would sue him for libel. I don’t doubt that they would win.
Posted by: dadanarchist | September 19, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Rome is burning, and McCain is just trying to change the page.
Posted by: James | September 19, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Alaska and Arizona, Palin / McCain ticket, Mut and Jeff………These two liars are really creepy, really creepy. Obama is a smart man, a temperate man and a thoughtful man, insight, foresight and hindsite he can do it. He doesn’t require the ‘hero’ status or ‘hockey mom’ from the little town of….on the prairie.
Let’s get on with it. No games. God, this is hurting the people.
Posted by: nativegirl | September 19, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
It is both funny and sad that the ridiculous neo cons won’t accept the truth when it is sitting in their face. If you google they guys name who wrote the article you would see that he has lied in the past several times and been busted for it most recently for an article claiming Iran passed a law to make Jewish people wear a yellow badge to identify themselves. That was a crock and this is a crock. I will be the first to admit that there are plenty of REAL issues you could use to make the case against Obama. But if you are trying to use this fugazi story or if you truly still believe this fugazi story then you need to drop whatever you are doing right now and go to the nearest nut house and Baker Act yourself!!!
Posted by: sgwhiteinfla | September 19, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
McCain-Palin have nowhere to go now but down, and I will tell you exactly how this will happen. They can run away from President Bush, but they can’t run away from the Republican Party. The Republicans will be regarded from now on as “the party that wrecked America.” Over the weeks ahead, as carnage in the economy and the financial markets ramps up, it will become increasingly clear.
Posted by: bill | September 19, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
Hagel is now trying to become the media’s favorite Republican. A position recently vacated by John McCain.
Posted by: Brian G. | September 19, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Obama, not even yet the elected President, had NO business meddling in these affairs. He did it to get more media attention.
Posted by: John | September 19, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
I love the sound of Republican panic. You folks have grown so accustomed to winning the White House that you are only now waking up the the reality that your run is over. The Republican party is and will be out of favor with a majority of Americans for one simple reason: they are not able to govern.
See, you guys act like it is “partisan” to say that Republicans are terrible stewards of our government, but really, it should come as no surprise. This is the party that claims “government is the problem”. Well, why would you expect someone who thinks the govt is the problem would be able to run government well? They have no respect for government, until, that is, it comes time to bail out their fat cat friends.
Funny how government sure seems to be the answer to this incompetent Bush crew….
Posted by: Andy in Boston | September 19, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Amir Taheri has a transparent- maybe understandable- political agenda regarding the present Iranian regime and uses his meager journalistic credentials to advance it. The McCain camp does not seem to have learned any lessons from the deceptions perpetrated by some Iraqi dissidents prior to Bush’s misguided war. Fortunaely, the media seems to be more vigilent this time round.
Posted by: Maria | September 19, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Amir Taheri has a transparent- maybe understandable- political agenda regarding the present Iranian regime and uses his meager journalistic credentials to advance it. The McCain camp does not seem to have learned any lessons from the deceptions perpetrated by some Iraqi dissidents prior to Bush’s misguided war. Fortunaely, the media seems to be more vigilant this time round.
Posted by: Maria | September 19, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
This article is irrelevant because the previous article is already out there in cyberspace and the troops are livid. Retract away but a little too late. I personally believe the initial story as it fits into something Obama would do.
Posted by: Polly | September 19, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
GOBAMA = CINC and POTUS\
Sir to you
Posted by: Lofton, Kenny | September 19, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
– Jake Tapper and Kirit Radia
“What actually demands an explanation is why the McCain campaign was so willing to give credence to such a questionable story with such tremendous international implications without first talking to Republicans present at Obama’s meeting with al-Maliki, who back Obama’s version of the meeting and completely dismiss the Post column as untrue.”
McCain didn’t consult factual information for the same reason he’s been putting out the bogus “video release” ads with total lies. His latest ad claims that Obama consulted Frank Raines, Fannie Mae’s ousted chief, on economic matters. Obama never did any of this, but McCain was able to appeal to his base by dragging out another historically first black man for the purpose of igniting fear and mistrust of blacks in power.
McCain’s apology for not voting for a day of remembrance of MLK was not received well for a reason. Some people are too old and set in their ways to understand progress and they will resort to the old-style lying and gimmicky politics just to win “honor”.
Losing to Obama will put him out of his mentally warped misery as he learns to be human LIKE OTHERS.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Common Sense | September 19, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
Chuck Hagel does not qualify to be a Republican…
Posted by: Mike | September 19, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
I would not believe a single word the GOP says about Obama anymore. They have stooped to a new low in this election and with the global meltdown caused the be Republican administration, the CEO of AIG Maurice Greenberg himself a Republican is it any wonder that the voters are getting very angry at Republicans.
Palin is a blip on the screen and by blocking the investigation she has not thoroughly been vetted. The Republicans are really disadvantaging her by not complying with subpeona’s and there is much more to the story than we know. I would hope ABC has some reporters in Wasilla and getting to the truth before the election -the voters have the right to know everything that a public figure has done in her job while serving the public -not herself.
Palin has also not released her income taxes, I guess those nights when she slept at home and billed the taxpayer are not claimed as benefits. She would be guilty of tax evasion that is why she has not released them. Palin is just another crooked Republican with lipstick and a beehive hairdo. No biggy here and the bloom has worn off.
Republicans have put us into a despirate point and near disaster for the economy. We came this close to a total meltdown and a major depression of the country, do you actually think anyone believes any Republican now?
Posted by: Teris | September 19, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
Thanks to reporters like — Jake Tapper and Kirit Radia who are not distorting the truth, we can make informed voting decisions. Thank you ABC for clearing up the muddy waters of this election.
Posted by: Teris | September 19, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
I would take the word of the Iraqi Foreign Minister over Senator Obama’s. has anyone asked him about caucus fraud? Has anyone in the MSM interviewed any of the people who claim to have evidence of this? Is anyone concerned about fair elections?
Posted by: Chris | September 19, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Obama did not meet with Maliki with Crocker present. He had dinner with Talabani with Crocker and Petraeus. In fact the pics links to have the headline of Obama meeting the Iraqi president, thats not Maliki.
Posted by: Old Dem | September 19, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Andy,
“Who would have guessed that the McCain ticket would become such an embarrassment with their lies/gaffes that Bush would not want to be associated with them.”
I thought the same thing. But we wouldn’t want to fall into the Rove trap machine now would we. These republican disagreements could be heartfelt, but they could also be setting a stage. In any event, McCain’s “gaffes” are blatent lies and he cannot be trusted. The alternative is that he cannot be trusted with the presidency because he cannot differentiate between truth and right-wing radio and is, therefore, incompetent.
He’s hot-headed and quick to judge if it means divisiveness.
Obama/Biden 08!
Posted by: Andy
Posted by: Common Sense | September 19, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Folks, there were two meetings. Jake Tapper is confused, again.
Meeting 1:
There was one meeting where Obama along with Bush officials met with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.
Meeting 2:
And there was another separate private meeting between Obama and Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari.
Neither Jake Tapper’s nor Obama’s account of the meeting with Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki gets Obama off the hook for what the double dealing he did in Meeting #2 with Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari.
Jake Tappera and Kirit Radia, don’t confuse the public on this. You owe America a retraction and clarification. There were obvioulsy two meetings. One with Maliki, the other was with Zebari.
It was Obama’s comments to ZEBARI that is the problem!!
What. A. Coverup. By. A.B.C.
Posted by: USVet | September 19, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Those of you who think the reporter has lie before and so thinks this article about Obama meeting to stopping the withdrawal of troops is also a lie. Is as sick as McCain is a liar. And we know that for sure. He is no different from Bush. Secondly, Mr. Obama and others in the meeting, namely some Republicans Bushes said Obama’s account of the meeting is true. I’m with the reporter, if Obama has stopped the withdrawal of troop it would have been a headliner. But boy, thanks for giving Obama his dues. Most of us know how smart and competent Mr. Obama is in negotiations.
Posted by: octobersun | September 19, 2008, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
McCain = Senile Liar
Palin = Carnival Sideshow Freak
I have not met a Republican yet who can say they are proud of this ticket and keep a straight face.
Stop the madness.
Posted by: James Melman | September 19, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
When I ask my friends if they are OK with all of the twisted false commercials McCain put out last week, they say no, but that they HAVE to support them otherwise they may lose.
I always respond by asking them if McCain wins the election, do they see that as a WIN… then they usually frown.
Enough the the tabloid spectacle. Lets all step back from the bullsh*t and use our brains for a moment.
What has the last 8 years brought us? When was the last time you felt secure financially… about 10 years about like everyone else? Do you really think all the neo-cons and wall street thugs working for McCain right now are going to change their tune?
C’mon folks… it is time to lookout for yourself and your neighbors and sweep the criminals out of Washington.
No McCain… No Cheerleader.
Posted by: Marny Fieldman | September 19, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
So it is official? The Washington Post is no longer a credible source, yes?
Posted by: Vile Pliskin | September 19, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
Hagel and Lunar are both Republicans and state that the claim is false. Also the Bush administration states it is false.
For those McCain supporters- are you now not trusting members from your own party? McCain is the only one that tells the truth? Come on! He is a liar and even his own party is not willing to go under the bus with him.
Remember that Obama is a member of the Foreign Relations Committee so he has a reason to be there to discuss these issues.
Also, the Bush/McCain camp were against a timeframe that Obama was pushing for until after he came back from his Iraq tour in July where he met with al-Maliki. Suddenly al-Maliki was ready for a timeframe so then the Bush administration started supporting a time horizon/ timetable to release troops. Exactly what Obama has been saying all along. So, how is that delaying the troop withdrawl? If anything, it shows progress for the troops.
It is amazing to me that these McCain supporters are so far brainwashed and ignorant that they only believe what McCain says even though most of his statements are lies. That is scary!!! McCainology is borderline communism!
Posted by: Kate | September 19, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
I used to vote Republican. Now I am Independent.
The Palin choice was the last straw. McCain could drop at any second. I do not want a incompetent ladder climbing psycho in charge of my country.
The super wealthy McCains are not like me, but they are like the Neo-Cons and crooked bankers who are OWN the Republican party and are harming us all.
McCain does not know what it is like to work in the trenches like me.
Posted by: Randy Miller | September 19, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
“and didn’t Obama have an “unauthorized”policy talk”( wink wink) with the Canadians about Nafta….one of those double speak conversations that say “I say” but “I MEAN….”.”
Good example. Because firstly, no, Obama didn’t. His economic advisor, Goolsbee, spoke to the Canadian consul general in Chicago. A memo resulting from that meeting was leaked.
As for Goolsbee’s reassurances to the Canadians, bear in mind that Obama’s intention with NAFTA (as he said specifically at the time) is to include enforceable labor and environmental standards. Now, considering that Canada and the USA already have similar standards for labor and environment, who do you think that’s aimed at? Canada or Mexico?
So why’s that a good example? Because, as with this story, it’s blatantly obvious that many people decide what their opinion is first based purely on their biases, then research it to back that opinion up, ignoring anything that counters their ill-formed opinion, no matter how absurd.
In this instance, when you look at the details, there wasn’t really any contradiction with Obama saying in public that he wants to renegotiate NAFTA to include enforceable labor and environmental standards and Goolsbee saying to the Canadians in private, “don’t worry.” Now had Goolsbee been saying that to Mexico, there might have been an issue.
So in the end, whether Obama’s stance on Free Trade in general is better than McCain’s, that’s a significant issue, worth focusing on. But Goolsbee talking to the Canadians? A complete non-issue.
Posted by: Aengil | September 19, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
McCain / Palin = Unstable / Unable
Posted by: David Kirkpatrick | September 19, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
It’s one thing to bend the rules, another to break them. The McCain-Palin ticket keeps breaking the rules in their political ads with outright lies. I would be ashamed to have them lead this country.
Posted by: Paul | September 19, 2008, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Biden said the “rich” should pay more taxes, not everybody.
It irks me that folks take the time to post on line without learning all the facts beforehand.
Wake up everyone. Our country is in a major crisis and we are going to need one another to drag ourselves out of it.
Regardless of which candidate you support, get over the emotional ignorance and research the issues for yourself – then make an informed decision.
Posted by: nandssmith | September 19, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Jack Tapper is doing a great job, this was an interesting story no one would cover and he got to the bottom of it.
Posted by: Mike B | September 19, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Confirmed: Barack Obama did not interfere with US foreign policy while in Iraq
Via Instapundit, I read a report by Jake Tapper which discusses how Bush administration officials – and other Republican congressmen – are saying that Barack Obama did not try to interfere with Bushs policy towards Iraq in a meeting with Iraq le…
Posted by: Sister Toldjah | September 19, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Charlie –
See, the country is in a financial crisis. The confidence in the market place — the financial institutions has been shaken to its very core. People don’t trust their invested money is safe.
Confidence that the government is working to solve the problem is critical ( as evident today). So instead of playing politics in this sort of event, Obama rightfully said nothing about any economic plan that he may have. During times like these, democrats and republicans need to work together to solve a crisis. Projecting an image of unity and focus of the government to solve that crisis is paramount.
Posted by: Matt | September 19, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
I really is telling how so many Republicans will grab onto the FAKE story and keep believing it even when it is PROVEN to be wrong. Their blind hatred for Democrats and, in particular, Obama has them reaching for ANYTHING in an attept to discredit him. It seems they have absolutely no compunction using utter fabrications as long as they feel it suits what they WANT to believe!
Posted by: Gregory | September 19, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I thought we weren’t supposed to trust anything the Bush administration says or does?
Never mind, it is as nothing, we remember nothing!
To serve Obama, the Bush administration is, now, ZING! ZOUNDS! A beacon of light, of integrity that cannot be questioned! So let it be written!
Yea, in the final days of the Pre-Obama Era, racists, women-haters, and others, even unto Republicans unto even the members of the Bush Administration, shall be washed clean of their iniquities, shall cast away the shadows that the minions of Move On, Inc. have rendered them for years.
Let the People Hail These and All Such Patriots of the World, These who Witness Truth and Justice!
History will Judge them Well!
Posted by: Laura Semilian | September 19, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
My apologies to Octobersun!
In my previous post I mistakenly attributed a quote to him/her. It should have been attributed to…. Posted by: USVet | Sep 19, 2008 9:02:47 PM
Posted by: Gregory | September 19, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
Posted by: USVet | Sep 19, 2008 9:02:47 PM
“Folks, there were two meetings. Jake Tapper is confused, again.”
“Meeting 1:
There was one meeting where Obama along with Bush officials met with Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.”
“Meeting 2:
And there was another separate private meeting between Obama and Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari.”
//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\//\\
Truely unbelievable!
It seems that Republicans have no compunction about lying, and in THIS case, fabricating “information” to support the lie! Is there no limit to the depth Republicans will sink in their blind hatred of Democrats and, in particular, Obama!?!
Posted by: Gregory | September 19, 2008, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
I guess Obama was really there to help the president. Yeah, right! Hey Tapper, why are you giving an inaccurate account of what meetings took place? Are you trying to fool someone?…everyone? You are utterly abusing your profession by using it to deceive Americans. Furthermore, you should be REPORTING (can you say “unbiased”?), not using your job to spread PROPAGANDA. This kind of crap is why I choose FOX.
Posted by: brad | September 19, 2008, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Republican Hagel endorsed Obama, said he wanted to be VP.
They are lying for him.
Posted by: kat in you hat PUMA | September 19, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Bush/Palin/McCain have been SO wrong on practically every single issue (privitization of social security, modeling healthcare reform after the financial market, not using international diplomacy, voting against veteran benefits, voting against equal pay for women, delaying energy alternatives, this list goes on and on and on. Yet they still try to wrap themselves in the flag and claim their fiscally conservativeness. Fortunately, the facts don’t bear our them boasts.
Posted by: Ray | September 19, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
Ray,
Why not give credit where it’s due:
Hoover/Nixon/Reagan/Bush/Palin/McCain 08!
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 19, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Mcain is getting old, we dont know whether he forgets or is too old to remember. In any case GOP is desparately LYING.
Palin is another liar added to the ticket!
Posted by: mike | September 19, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Now the wackos are even attacking their own. To the one who said that hagel “doesnt even qualify to be a republican” i have long suspected there were at least minimum proficiency lying standards to join. Thanks for the confirmation.
Posted by: pffft | September 19, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
It’s funny to see that now people want to believe the Iraqis because they want to believe that Obama did something wrong. Where was those same people when the Iraqis said they didn’t have weapons of mass destruction. You want to believe who you want to believe because you to afraid to vote for Obama.
Wow I hope you believe those same Iraqis when they tell you to get out or when they tell you that their kids are getting killed left and right by American soldiers. I hope you believe them when they tell you they’ll give you oil and then sell it to the Chinese all the while kicking BP, Shell, and other American no bid companies out. Oh I forgot they did promise you oil and then sold it to the Chinese and they did kick your American oil companies out. I guess it must have been the American’s fault.
You don’t believe the Bush people and Hagel because they backed up Obama. Truth Hurts and you can’t face the facts that your man McCain keeps getting called out by his own people.
Better luck next time!
Posted by: Joy | September 19, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
None of which explains why the Obama campaign spokesman, in denying the story initially, worked so very hard to conflate the two different agreements.
Posted by: NightFire | September 19, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
Nightfire:
People like you will never be satisfied. Obama could come out with a videotape of the whole conversation and you would say he doctored it. He’s damned if he do. Damned if he don’t.
One thing that all of you are forgetting is that Obama is on the Foreign Relations Committee.
What happened is McCain filled your head up of thinking the man has no experience and you all fell for it.
What you need to do is look up his record in the Senate and you will see all the work he has done.
Unlike McCain he has done everything to make sure the troops are well taken care of. Can you say that about McCain.
My brother who just came back from Iraq can’t get any help and he needs it. You know why? Because of people like McCain who limits how much support they can get for mental problems.
Have you been to Iraq because if you haven’t I suggest you take a trip.
I have had from my great-grandfather grandfather, father, uncles, and brother who have served in the military and I must say I find it sad to hear you people who sit on your butts judge Obama for wanting to get our overworked men and women out of Iraq THE RIGHT WAY!
Posted by: Joy | September 20, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am
Well DUH
you cant believe any thing GOP or Iraqis say
Posted by: nick | September 20, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am
The Republican Party in the need of urgent reform because is out of touch with the everyday life of the American people.
Americans want answers to they problems they want better healthcare they want better pay they don’t want just change because that sounds good on election time, they want change from the Bush policies. This election is not only about some bridge in Alaska it is about all the bridges and roads in all of United States because they are all crying out for repairs and maintenance. This is because for the last 8 years the Bush and the Republicans have spent enormous amounts to build up Iraq and they have forgotten about the needs of their own country.
Posted by: foreclosure | September 20, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am
Thanks for the coverage.
Posted by: mara | September 20, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Randy – Sarah Palin is not like me or any other woman I have ever come across either – and that is not a compliment. I’ve known woman from every religious background, every political affiliation, women from across the country, born-agains and atheists – but I have never met a single woman who has made the choices Palin has made. Obama says famlies are off-limits. Sarah Palin’s decisions regarding her family are not off limits – they reveal her character. And I do not know a single woman, who, if they had one child who was a baby with special needs and a vulnerable 17 year old in trouble who would compromise the commitment she made as a parent and run for a demanding poitical office for sheer ruthless political ambition and put that kid ina national spotlight to get ahead herself. I don’t know a man who would do it either. And the fact that she is the “Focus on the Family” candidate makes it worse. She has no character. She is not “every woman” – whether that woman has money (like a husband who pulls $100K from big oil), has no money. comes from a small town or New York, has a PhD or no degree at all. She is in a class all by herself – and she doesn’t represent me or any woman I know or have ever met. She’s a cardboard candidate.
Posted by: mara | September 20, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am
I am tired of all the half-truths and outright lies the McCain campaign has been spewing. Sure, the Obama campaign has stretched the truth a few times, but it is nowhere near the untruths of the McCain campaign.
-Bridge to Nowhere
-Claiming Palin didn’t take earmarks
-Claiming Obama asked for $1 billion in earmarks when he had asked only for around 300million, and Palin had asked for many times that amount per capita.
-Obama wants to teach 3-year olds “comprehensive” sex-ed when he wants to teach them enough to protect themselves from getting molested.
-Claiming Franklin Raines is Obama’s econ advisor when all the contact they had was a few discussions on econ issues. (McCain on the other hand, has golden parachute Fiorina who nearly killed HP as his econ advisor).
And now this.
Obama is also on the Senate Foreign Policy Committee, stands to reason he would be there anyway.
Please remember what happened the last time the President lied to America- Iraq- over non-existent WMDs. Bush insisted on jumping in when the UN Atomic Agency told them they had so far found little evidence of WMDs and asked the Bush Admin to at least allow them 6 more months to finish the report if he really wanted to jump into the Iraq mess.
Sadly, they were ignored.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 20, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am
So after several days, Hagel & Co. have figured out the “truth” as it best suits the agenda of an Obama presidency, and now Obama supporters are defending the Bush administration. What a Difference a Day Makes!
Whether one agrees with John McCain’s platform or not, one must observe that he is and always has been passionately loyal to the United States, and has consistently striven to serve the interests of this country, and, indeed, causes greater than his own self-interest. He keeps his friends close to home, and, to the manner born, he is not interested in alliances to achieve financial gain or personal status in the eyes of the world.
Yet, many people, including independent voters like myself, have observed the Republican Administrative Establishment’s lack of support for their designated candidate.
I always knew that John McCain is quite different than President Bush. I am now certain that John McCain must also be quite a formidable figure. How else could John McCain’s appeal to voters during the 2008 election, when the Democratic candidate was naturally supposed to win, have necessitated such cooperation against him from what is, ostensibly, considered to be “both sides of the aisle.” After all, he has been around a long time, and he speaks his mind.
Of course, perhaps several of the strange attempts to undermine John McCain, however subtly, that emanate from those calling themselves either Republicans and/or Democrats at present are not really a bipartisan effort, if one considers the greater historical context.
Posted by: Laura Semilian | September 20, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Ummmm … Perhaps the NY Post is just another Murdoch rag meant to distribute distortions on non-right-wing nuts?
Hello!!! You really need to waste time debunking the NY POST?????
The MSM must stop falling for strawman bogus arguments like this one, global warming does not exist and that drilling for oil now will lower gas prices!
C’mon, man, get with the program …
Posted by: mk3872 | September 20, 2008, 1:46 am 1:46 am
McCain is not honorable in the least. The Republicans have been doing this sort of thing for years. But I know that my local paper will write about this, but in the end will endorse McCain, and say he has earned the the right to be elected.
This is crazy that a man running for president can smear and defame an individual, be called on it, and still be in the running. Not once but over and over again.
I think the public needs to be educated about it’s civic duty.
Posted by: Thinking | September 20, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am
Children, quiet down now and take your seats. Lets stop the name calling. Lets see if there are some issues we can discuss to see the difference between the tickets.
I must first clarify something. McCain is the REPUBLICAN candidate for President. He was at their convention, adopted their platform, and swore loyalty to them. His party has had the White house for 8 years and 6 years of the Congress. Unemployment is higher than it has been in 15 years, real income has dropped dramatically, the national debt has almost doubled to $9.4 Trillion. Mortgages have gone into foreclosure at a higher rate since the depression. Yet, he is running away from HIS REPUBLICAN PRESIDENT faster than Usain Bolt ran the 100 meters. Just two questions for McCain. Are you proud of the job President Bush has done on foreign policy and the economy (you voted with him 91% of the time? And, why won’t you take a picture with him?
1. I believe being well educated is a good thing, not bad. I know this is controversial, but go with me on this. Sarah Palin attended 5 colleges before she could get a degree in journalism and was at the bottom of her class. John McCain was last in his class at the Naval Academy that his daddy got him into. George Bush barely got through Yale (the elitist). Barack Obama graduated at the top of his class and was President of the Harvard Law Review making him one of the brightest, most mature and well-read men of his generation. He got in on scholarship since his single mother couldn’t afford the tuition.
2. Can we agree that Sarah Palin knows nothing about foreign policy and has admitted that she never gave it much thought? Being able to see Russia does not make you an authority on Russia, agree? What was the last book she read on foreign policy before she was nominated for VP (if she has read anything). She has never met a world leader (or any world figure of importance) and has only visited Canada and Mexico on vacation in the last year and spent a few days in Kuwait on a military base. She never set foot in Iraq and her saying so is a lie, and even if she did, she was there for 5 minutes not making her an authority on the issues between the Shia, Sunni and Kurds. During Gibson’s interview She was told to say that the U.S should not second guess Israel if it strikes Iran. The problem is that this is not U.S. Policy. The U.S. has not approved a strike by Israel and has asked Israel not to launch an attack. It happens to be McCain’s position also. She needs to keep her mouth shut or she is going to start a war. Probably with Spain since McCain’s not talking to Spain.
3. Confronting a biased press is a good thing, not a bad thing. Can we agree that Sarah Palin has done everything she and her puppeteers can do to avoid her having to face serious questions about her behavior and conduct as Mayor and Governor? Even if the press is “biased”, a person of substance and courage would face the press and prove that the stories they told were true. Hillary Clinton never ran away from the press. Sarah oh Sarah, the truth will set you free (but then again will end you political career).
4. Secrecy by our government officials is bad. If Sarah Palin and her family and staff have nothing to hide on Troopergate, forget the investigations, just go on CNN and present all your e- mails and phone calls to prove that no pressure was put on anyone to fire your ex-brother-in-law.
5. Sarah Palin and John McCain believe that Roe v. Wade guaranteeing a woman the right to choose should be overruled and will appoint justices to do it. Sarah Palin believes that if your are raped and have an abortion that you are a murderer. Why won’t she just say that on TV in front of all the women in America?
6. Can we agree that even if the “surge” reduced violence in Iraq at this time that if the country listened to Obama and not cowboy George that we would not have needed a surge and 4,200 U.S. soldiers would not be dead and 30,000 not wounded? Which decision do you want to make sure the President gets right?
7, If the surge was so successful in reducing violence, why are we being told it is fragile and Iraq could revert to violence at anytime. So, the surge is working and we need to keep our troop level over 140,000 and can’t bring anyone home. But, if the surge didn’t work we couldn’t bring our troops home because there would be too much violence and we have to stay and fight. So, WE CAN NEVER BRING THE TROOPS HOME until Iraq is a nice friendly democracy where everyone is singing Kumbaya. Simple, if McCain wins the troops stay in Iraq for at least 10 more years. If Obama wins, he brings them home in 18 months and makes the Iraqis defend their democracy.
8. John McCain announces he would fire the Chairman of the SEC. Uh, John, the President can’t fire the members of the SEC (helps to understand the rules of the government you want to lead) and you do understand this guy is a friend of yours who you voted for. Even the WSJ called you an idiot today for suggesting this.
9. John McCain, will you stand in front of Obama and call him a coward during the debates and say that you are a real patriot and Obama is not? Shame on you, but then again you are just like Bush — if people don’t agree with you they are evil and a traitors. Country First! Duetchland Uber Alis!
10. John, what kind of man is away from his wife for 4 years, comes back to find her in a wheelchair and dumps her and their 3 children for a woman 17 years younger than himself and who has hundreds of millions of dollars? What do we call a man like that? I believe we call that man of low character and disloyalty. And, at your inaugural, why didn’t you show pictures of your kids from your first wife and have them on stage with you. Are you ashamed of them that they remind people of what a slime you were to your first wife.
11. Everyone you need to look this up.
Keating 5 and the S&L Crisis. This was the worst economic crisis since the depression. Guess who was right in the scandal involving senators influencing government agencies to protect the CEOs of the S&Ls that were stealing America blind.
Finally I feel bad, and want to give Sarah an easy question. Is North Dakota north or south of South Dakota? This is not an open book and you have only one answer. I will give you a clue. The names of the states are revlevant. You have 30 MINUTES.
Posted by: Alanmarv | September 20, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Are these not just distractions from the real issues facing Americans? How are Americans going to cope with this huge debt? How will we fund education, health care, housing, new energy supplies, mitigate global warming, etc. etc. I cannot understand these bloggers who make these spurious comments while not even slightly understanding the issues facing the country. Having an argument about who voted against body armor? Everyone knows that Rumsfeld and Defense did not provide the troops with the proper equipment during the first 2 years of the war. That was confirmed by the troops.
Why would anyone want to elect a 72 year old man who is the biggest celebrity and elitist in Washington, who owns 9 houses, is out of touch with real Americans, whose wife wears a $300,000 dress to the RNC, who picked a running mate after meeting her a couple of times and who is totally scary and unqualified for the job. And it is even scarier to think she could land in the Oval Office. Talk about Bush #2. She is exactly the female version of President Bush.
As a professional and smart woman I am thoroughly insulted by McCain’s choice of Palin. What’s up with his judgment?Where is the McCain I so loved in 2000?
Posted by: redgirl | September 20, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
All gaffes considered I’d put the Gallup 9/20 daily at O-man plus 6 Saturday, plus 7 on Sunday.
With all the new material the worst Obama does at the first debate is a draw.
With Palin’s statements today re: “partisan Democrats” to blame for quashing her pro-Israel rally appearance (I guess she thinks democrats hate jews) and thereby accusing dems of ignoring Israel’s supposed exposure to a “second Holocaust (umm doesn’t Israel have 100+ nukes which kind of distinguishes this “threat” from slaughtering unarmed civilians) a game changer), it is obvious she will not be able to digest the What’s Happening In the World” Cliff Notes she was given two weeks ago. So, it seems pretty likely Biden, and the moderator, will dust her at the second debate.
TiVos on from here on out. I want to see McCain’s “Country Last” pander VP pick blow up in his face, over and over again.
Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | September 20, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am
The way a candidate runs their electoral campaign offers a foreshadowing of how they’ll run their administration if they win.
Instead of rebutting Obama/Biden’s policies, they have to first distort them until they are completely unrecognisable before then self-righteously slamming Obama/Biden. An example: Sex-ed. McCain camp claimed Obama wanted to teach comprehensive sex ed to children, when in truth, he supported a program that would teach them just enough to avoid sexual predators. They simply nitpick and have to distort Obama’s policies in order to be able to rebutt them. What does this say then?
Bush played up Iraq, exaggerating its ties with Al-Qaeda. That Saddam was a tyrant only served to provide some moral justification for those who were on the fence about the invasion. The anarchy and civil war in Iraq is the product of jumping in without getting all the facts, by distorting facts in order to draw support for your cause.
Iraq wasn’t a hot bed for Al-Qaeda before the war, but now it is. The surge may have helped repress the violence, but it’s a stop-gap measure, and in the long run, Iraq needed a evolution in its people’s minsets to supprt democracy and prevent the country from falling apart due to sectarian divisions, and a sudden regime change like that when Iraqis have been under colonial rule and a dictatorship for the past century has left them not able to adjust their mindsets to support a democracy and help stability.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 20, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am
Well, if Palin cannot even take on the “liberal, biased media”, and does not want to do interviews with them, because she is not treated with “respect and deference”, how is SHE going to deal with Ahmadinejad, Putin or Chavez who will be even less charitable?
You know, I think the reason why it seems that the media may like Obama more is because he’s friendlier and an easy person to talk to, and he didn’t call down fire and brimstone on reporters when the Rev. Wright thing exploded, and instead went up front to give a speech about it. Unlike Palin who prefers to play victim and dissed the media.
They now only have themselves to blame if the media’s not on their side.
Look at Cheney, he had to go to Georgia. A VP’s roles are now greatly expanded and not just ceremonial.
And Palin doesn’t even know that it was Georgia who started the Ossetian conflict, not Russia.
Posted by: Grey Matter | September 20, 2008, 3:46 am 3:46 am
reprinted from HMMMMMMM:
“According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.”
“”He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview.”
______________
“A lot of this information has disappeared……. …. but there are still small patches of truth around.
If Obama had not said these things, why has he taken so long to deny them?
And why doesn’t he call Zebari a liar to his face?”
hmmmmmmmmm?
Posted by: america*centric | September 20, 2008, 5:51 am 5:51 am
Tapper didn’t state the deceit and the damage done to Obama harshly enough. The right seized on Taheri’s central theme; delaying the withdrawal of our troops, instead of the true theme which is to urge a delay in negotiating a ‘Strategic Framework Agreement’.
Many in Congress fear that the agreement may lock America into obligations that Congress, the American people, and the new administration won’t be prepared to support. Most reasonable people believe it’s
an agreement that should be negotiated by the next administration.
The US has ‘Status of Forces’ agreements all over the world. That agreement or a new UN mandate would give us a legal basis to be in Iraq after December 31st of this year. I haven’t heard anyone argue that we don’t need that issue resolved before the end of the year. The more treaty-like agreement (strategic
framework) should be delayed. Agree or not, that’s the issue that Taheri distorted by stating that Obama tried to stall troop withdrawals.
The damage has already been done. The right seized Taheri’s story and ran with it. Rush Limbaugh distorted the story even further calling Obama’s position treasonous. Congress has held numerous hearings on the subject and many have come to the same conclusion as Obama and are urging the administration to delay the ‘Strategic Framework Agreement (not withdrawals). According to Limbaugh’s reasoning, they must all be treasonous.
The Limbaugh distortion is obvious on it’s face. His transcript of one of the Zebari quotes in this article reads: “He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement on US troop withdrawal until after
the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington.” It’s amazing how adding a few little words to the quote can change the meaning.
Limbaugh and others who picked up the story are willing to have their readers believe that Obama is telling his supporters that he’ll get the troops home while secretly urging the Iraqi’s to “hold them”. They’re calling Obama a hypocrite and call his actions treasonous. Understanding the issue as an oversight function and presenting a reasoned position as a Presidential candidate is hardly treasonous.
Only one of three conclusions is possible regarding McCain’s response. Either he is content to allow the American people to believe the smear, he has not educated himself about the issue (including the hearings), or he’s content to let Bush make Iraq decisions for him if he wins the election. I think his position
demands an explanation.
Posted by: reveral | September 20, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am
Isnt the NY Post owned by Murdoch too? I dont know about you but I do not take quotes from any Murdoch owned enterprise as anything but a Republican distortion of the truth…
I am actually starting to think that Murdoch/Fox runs the Republican party NOT the other way around. Funny thing is…Murdoch isnt even American.
Posted by: Becky | September 20, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am
11. Everyone you need to look this up.
Keating 5 and the S&L Crisis. This was the worst economic crisis since the depression. Guess who was right in the scandal involving senators influencing government agencies to protect the CEOs of the S&Ls that were stealing America blind.
—————————————
Lets not forget the Keeting 5 were:
The five senators, Alan Cranston (D-CA), Dennis DeConcini (D-AZ), John Glenn (D-OH), John McCain (R-AZ), and Donald W. Riegle (D-MI), were accused of improperly aiding Charles H. Keating, Jr., chairman of the failed Lincoln Savings and Loan
After a lengthy investigation, the Senate Ethics Committee determined in 1991 that Alan Cranston, Dennis DeConcini, and Donald Riegle had substantially and improperly interfered with the FHLBB in its investigation of Lincoln Savings. Senators John Glenn and John McCain were cleared of having acted improperly but were criticized for having exercised “poor judgment”.
The Senate Ethics Committee ruled that the involvement of Glenn in the scheme was minimal, and the charges against him were dropped.[24] He was only criticized by the Committee for “poor judgment.”[27]
The Ethics Committee ruled that the involvement of McCain in the scheme was also minimal, and he too was cleared of all charges against him.[25][24] McCain was criticized by the Committee for exercising “poor judgment” when he met with the federal regulators on Keating’s behalf.[6] The report also said that McCain’s “actions were not improper nor attended with gross negligence and did not reach the level of requiring institutional action against him….Senator McCain has violated no law of the United States or specific Rule of the United States Senate
Posted by: Patti | September 20, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am
Becky
Take it from an Australian.. Murdoch runs Australia the (Liberal party) and in the UK (The torries) aswell as the Republican party in the US.
Here we have Fairfax media which has done a great job getting the truth to Australian and we got Rid of Howard (Liberal party) as PM.
In the UK they got Rid of The Torries thanks to the gardian news paper, virgin media and the BBC and then Murdoch made a deal with PM Blair we all know how that worked out!
Murdoch tells ever American what he is doing its in every ad “FOX the most powerful name in news” he is a monster!
For America to be free everyone needs to turn off any news corp owned channel or paper!
Get free of him America vote Obama and boycot anyone that has ads on FOX.
Good luck to all the Obama supporters the world is on your side.
Vote on the issues not on the BS.
Country first over here is seen as code for white first is that how its taken over there ?
Country first would be to vote for the man who’s campaign is paid for by the people. For the guy offering tax cuts to middle America..
Good luck people vote smart!
Be the good country you guys used to be.
with lov from Australia.
Posted by: Aussie | September 20, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am
Everyone, don’t forget to register to vote before OCT 1st. Do early voting and show the world what we can do!!!!!!!
Posted by: Dee | September 20, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Dear Mr. Tapper:
Thanks for your great reporting. We need more real reporters like to keep us informed.
Respectfully,
MB
Posted by: Mary Brown | September 20, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
So it is official? The Washington Post is no longer a credible source, yes?
Posted by: Vile Pliskin | Sep 19, 2008 9:17:28 PM
New York Post… NOT Washington Post… big difference… no comparison!!!
Posted by: rcwblessed | September 20, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Jake Tapper – Thank you for following up to uncover the “real” facts which underscores the need for consistent and quality reporting when it comes to the McCain political camp and of course the NY Post (Murdoch).
When will the “real” media start to pin down McCain for his continued breach of honor [honesty] and this “fake” country first claim. More like I’m 72 and I will do/say anything to be President.
KC
Posted by: Ken Nohe | September 20, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Sen. Chuck Hagel why didn’t you run fur President? You’re the real person of honor!! – and I say that as a Democrat
Please serve as Secretary of State for President Obama
Posted by: Ken Nohe | September 20, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Jake, Jake…just because some choose to believe the lies spread by Obama and the rest of the MSM, including yourself, it just wash. Obama is for Obama period, end of story. Perhaps you still believe the Rosenbergs were innocent?
Posted by: Sue | September 20, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
McCain is a liar, is VP pick is a liar and his campaign is replete with liars. Why in the world would they bother to find out the truth?? I mean, the truth really doesn’t help the lying, does it?
Posted by: Jackie | September 20, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Live in the Midwest, as I do, and Chuck Hagel’s name doesn’t inspire confidence OR trust. Don’t count on him being around much longer. His political days are numbered, JMHO.
Back to the reason for this post, anything that goes on , involving this country’s dealings with Iran should be thoroughly but fairly investigated.
To suggest Mc Cain should have been above the frey, by wanting the facts of a report that could possibly have led to a charge of violation of the Logan Act, is , ummm, PHONY OUTRAGE, perhaps ?
Posted by: Nancy | September 20, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
why and how is it that dishonest, corrupt people with not even the slightest moral values and common sense, who live in the past, can even run for high offices, mcvain and mcvain terrify us all because if their worthless values are the role model all young people in this country follow, you might as well kiss america goodby for good. Good heavens, sen. obama’s running mates wife, Jill Biden is more educated and moral and honest than either mccain and palin. I vote obama/biden 08, but even if i did not believe i them, i would NEVER vote for the total destruction of america which affects my grown children and their children and their children, and if i voted for mcvain and mcvain, that is exactly what i believe will happen. They are both liars and they do not even respect laws made for the protection of this country.
Posted by: why is it | September 20, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
all the republican are whining and whining because they know if palin has to do anything besides a set script, she knows nothing about real life or good morals at all, she is the one that said the whining comment about hillary, and now repubs are whining their butts off about how unfair it is to prove what liars ad immoral they are….evidently they cannot take the heat, so they should have stayed out of the kitchen, so to speak, truth always wins eventually, even if it takes years, i am just afraid if palin and mccain,as she billed herself one time, gets in , the world may not have time to prove what liars and what their motivations truly are, as i believe the world will see our country is in the hands of ignoramouses….once again or still!
Posted by: why is it | September 20, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
i’m 20 and i don’t plan on voting now or ever. there is no point in voting when in the end everyone gets screwed no matter who gets picked as the president. politics are shady, down right dirty, and has no truth behind anything. all i see is news about barack obama and how great he is. why not hear more about the shady past? considering the media feels the need to put mcain/palin under a bus every day. what happened to unbiased media? oh wait there never was unbiased media. all i hear is obama this obama that. you hardly hear about mcain/palin unless it’s negative. you never hear the real negatives about obama. why? people want to paint him as this saint who will change america. he promises change but seems like we hear that every election and there is still NO change so why should obama be any different? i’m tired about hearing how he will be the 1st blck president if elected. i have nothing against blacks… but my black friends hate him because he’s being painted as a full black when he isn’t. one friend told me that she doesn’t understand why he’s considered black when he’s half white. she said if obama looked whiter and didn’t look as black as he does people wouldn’t be making a big thing about him being black. race is being an issue in this presidential election when it really shouldn’t just like age shouldn’t be a huge factor either. so what if mcain is 72? so what if obama is half black? these things don’t matter. the facts matter, the issues matter. i don’t hear anyone talking issues. i don’t hear anyone talking about russia and venezuala. i don’t hear anything substantial coming from anyone except mcain. he wants to help the economy, obama wants to raise taxes in a time of crisis. tell me how is that going to help anything? at the end of the day what would he accomplish? people work hard in this country, why should we be taxed heavily for giving back to our country? why give government more of our money we worked for? why should health care be so expensive average americans can’t afford? i went to several health care providers and was quoted $300.00 per month. i can barely afford the bills, food, and gas that there is no money for health care. gas is still $4 a gallon and the price per barrel is going down. us americans will not see a drop in prices for months! by the time prices begin to change the price per barrel will be on the rise all over again and we will be stuck paying $5 per gallon. we need off shore drilling, solar, wind, bio fuels, electric cars, natural gas. we need cheaper alternatives to oil. we need an economic boot, we need cheaper health care, and more money for our schools so our children of tomorrow can learn and be successful. we need a president who knows what they’re doing, someone who will change america for the better and ot for the worse, someone who is experienced, someone who knows forgeign policies, who know what to do if america was attacked. obama wouldn’t know what to do if the answer was staring at him in the face. he can have all of his stupid advisors, and political garbage. if i was voting i can say i’m leaning towards mccain/palin.
Posted by: someone | September 20, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
GOP cant stand the truth when they lie so much
BUSH appointees were also there
you hagel moron!
Posted by: nick | September 20, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Yaaaaay…….redgirl..i pray that your comments wake millions up for the sake of all of us, not just are grown children and grandchildren, but to preserve what is left of america and our rights as americans, i am for obama and biden as they at least represent some hope.
Posted by: why is it | September 20, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
if you dont Vote you are an insult to those who died (like my two Uncles) fighting facism and communism
Posted by: nick | September 20, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
When the truth is discovered and you choose to believe the lie, that’s called stupid. When you choose to vote for McCain/Palin, both liars (and she is highly unqualified) and you know that chose will more than likely cause further damage to your future, in southern terms, that’s called cutting off your nose to spite your face!
Posted by: Sandy | September 20, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Hagel is a true maverick. Why didn’t McCain simply ask Hagel before believing the lies of Taheri, who has a track record of being a lying neocon shill? Maybe McCain has had one of his uncontrollable temper episodes with Hagel and they’re not talking.
Posted by: Jeremy | September 20, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The republicans in the room have to side with Obama’s version of the story or they would be in hot water. Zebari has no reason to create this story. If Obama is telling the truth (lol) then why when he released his statement did it sound a lot like a smoke and glass version of Zebari. I agree let Obama call Zebari a liar to his face. Regardless of all facts Obama should not have had any discussions in Iraq while running for President. His agenda is a conflict of interest with that of our President. This will send the wrong message to leaders of all nations.
Posted by: danielle | September 20, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Hey someone, if you don’t vote, then don’t complain. It’s obvious you are a Republican and you have no African-American friends. 85% of African- Americans support Obama the others are Republican or undecided. Anyone with African-American friends would not refer to their “FRIENDS” as” the blacks”! And by the way all the issues you say you are concerned about are the issues Obama focuses on. His plan is to cut taxes for the middle class not raise them.
Unless you make around $5 million in McCain’s world you aren’t anywhere near the middle class! This race issue you speak of is an issue because some Caucasians will vote for McCain just because he’s “a white” damage the country or not, too old or not, Palin: no experience, so what, knowledge of foreign policy, who cares, she can see “Russia from her house”! At the age of 20, you might consider going back to school and getting more education it’s clear you either dropped out of high school or have a G.E.D. Most educated “people” under the age of 45 are going with Obama (Fact; check it out)
Posted by: Sandy | September 20, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
no excuse for mccain not having enough intelligence to learn computer. …i know a man in his later 40′s who is totally blind, does not type, uses verbal clues and instructions, and with windows vista, can talk into microphone, dictate, etc, he even has his own website, …he is not exceptional, ..he just has a functioning brain, like most of us….i was 60 something before i started learning, and i know how to install operating systems, sound, etc, because of having all operating systems from win,95,98,98Se , windows xp, windows millenium, windows vista, and other, and i am just a retired grandma, who did not want her grandchildren, who learn in grade school how to use computer, to be smarter and more proficient than their grandma, and i wanted to be able to talk to them when they told me which site to go to in order to learn something or a new game to play,…..so the only reason mcvain has in not knowing how to do the computer is…laziness,inability to concentrate,…or cannot remember things long enough to learn. sorry, but that is the truth, and in this day and age computer knowledge is paramount to research and keeping up with what is happening all over the world.
Posted by: why is it | September 20, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
oops.. my earliet comment cheering redgirl was a mistake, my cheer was actually for …alanmary…..sorry. , even though i misread the name of poster, my thoughts are the same…agree with alanmary
Posted by: why is it | September 20, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Dont you guys feel sick when you see McCain?
Posted by: HAHA | September 20, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
My goodness….. McCain and his unbelievable lies.
Posted by: SARAH-LIE | September 20, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
1. Chuck Hegel is not a source to anything. He is a treator.
2The whole argument is simply disgusting. Everybody is talking about a meeting with Maliki, Hegel and many toher persons. The NT Post article IS NOT ABOUT THAT MEETING AN dthat foreig minster gave the info to the NY Post journalist. Who has absolutely no reason toimagine a discussion described.
I have no doubt that the article is correct, and that Obama is committed a criminal act by saying what he sayd.
It is as simple as that. The rest is just misinformation, falsification and cover-up a criminal act.
Posted by: Thomas keri | September 20, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Don’t vote someone who can turn America into thirdworld.
Posted by: Jenn | September 20, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Zebari’s quote: “He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington.”
Limbaugh’s representation of Zebari’s quote: “He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement on US troop withdrawal until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington.”
Aren’t you tired of being spun? See my earlier entry about why those few words matter.
Posted by: reveral | September 20, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Obama is a FRAUD! It is NOT McCain that blew the whistle on this “story” – but – the Iraq leaders.
SO…..who should we believe???
Once again – obama will have a spin on what he really means. – DISGRACE
McCain/Palin
Posted by: Abby | September 20, 2008, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Chuck Hagel and his WIFE have MADE
political DONATIONS To OBAMA !!!!!
HAGEL IS AN UNPAID ADVISOR and has already openly supported the Messiah !!
Good Grief is the OBAMA MEDIA operates at ABC getting this desperate ?? I love that LIE about “Other unnamed sources ” in the Bush administration.
McCain and Palin are going to win despite this UNREAL NON STOP Propaganda peddled by the Obama Media !
Posted by: Burt | September 20, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
You guys are hilarious. All of you. I have read many of these comments, and none of them have convinced me to change my vote.
Posted by: malicea4thought | September 20, 2008, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
I believe Tehari’s article read both and Obama’s rebuttal in Tehari’s subsequent piece and the truth is clear. All those present are simply lying to Bush and the American people so that they can not be charged with treason. Furthermore, I no longer will believe ABC, the network which edits and poorly pieces together interviews in order to make female VP candidates seem incompetent. I also have no respect for their journalists, with the exception of Diane Sawyer or George Steph, the rest are a useless bunch of Obamabots. Gibson, you suck.
Posted by: melissa schneider | September 20, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
The dems in congress who aren’t talking keep quiet because obviously Obama has something on each of them. They all knew Biden’s son was on the take from Freddie and Fannie probably others. That is why Biden got railroaded into accepting the VP nod from Obama. He made it clear in the past that he was never interested in taking the post from Hillary Clinton.
Posted by: melissa schneider | September 20, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Nick,
I’m 30, I make about 50K a year and I support Obama, and I will tell you why.
First of all, you are right, it seems that politics have become a circus.
But you have to look beyond that and all the stuff the media put before your eyes. If you want answers and you want to be able to vote smartly, do your own research, don’t just listen to what people tell you. Before I supported Obama, I researched his past, what people who knew him in a professional capacity thought of him. I read the books he wrote to see what he actually said in there instead of taking the bits offered on TV, without any prejudice or passion. And guess what, turns out the guy is actually as smart as they come, very thoughtful of his peers, competitive on the basketball court, and someone who will listen to what everybody has to say in a debate, not just impose his own opinion. He is far from perfect, but from where I’m standing, he’s the best in the linenup. That behavior runs from the days when he was a professor of law. All that crap about elitism, guns, his color, flag pins that the press and republican ads push are distraction. What matters is where are we now and who can actually pull us out from there. McCain admitted he doesn’t know as much as he should about the economy, and he tends to be unpredictable. He seems to be a cool guy, but that doesn’t cut it. Also, his economic plan is weak and certainly won’t fix the economy. His bragging about the surge he’s backed up working is BS. It worked because of ethnic cleansing in the region, and people being tired of getting in the crossfire between US soldiers and terrorist from other countries who came in and don’t care about collateral damage. If anything it was luck that made it work, more than the number of troops. I think Obama is right to try to get us out of Iraq ASAP, Iraq was a mess up by the Bush administration, when some fools in the white house decided that they would built facts around the policy making up for a weak casus belli (case for war).
As for voting, it’s a privilege that some other countries dream on. Don’t waste it. That’s what validates you as a citizen. That what makes sure you can’t be taken for granted by the powers that be. Don’t let that right go because you are disenchanted, it’s a mistake. Even if you are going to vote for McCain/Palin, go ahead, exercise your civic rights. You vote based on who you think will make your life and the life of your peers better. Not who looks good, who claims what. The only way you’ll vote right, and the only way things will change is if you get actively involved, not just complain about the status quo. Do your research on the candidates and support the ones you want.
Posted by: Rado | September 20, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm
Jake Tapper, you wrote:
===”Barack Obama has never urged a delay in negotiations,” said Obama campaign national security spokesperson Wendy Morigi . . . .===
But on June 16, 2008 2:22 PM, NBC’s Domenico Montanaro reported Obama’s statement:
===He said he told Zebari that negotiations for a Status of Forces agreement or strategic framework agreement between the two countries should be done in the open and with Congress’s authorization and that it was important that that there be strong bipartisan support for any agreement so that it can be sustained through a future administration. He argued it would make sense to hold off on such negotiations until the next administration.===
Guess who I believe.
Posted by: DV | September 21, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Only ten days ago, a statement by Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari was quoted in the pan-Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat. Zebari himself said this about Barack Obama:
=== This question he asked me (Barak Obama) when I was in Washington some time ago I met with McCain and with Obama and Obama asked me why you urgency in signing this agreement, especially with the approaching change in the American administration and why not wait until the advent of the new administration next year even signed an agreement with A new administration and we agree on some issues and matters and the answer is with Obama, including: Iraq, I think that even if there was a democratic administration in the White House, it is better to have a policy instead of thinking exists in the file for a long time to be resolved including the nettle that the Convention are not binding The next administration be comfortable in dealing with the Iraqi people rather than the start of the crisis and their problems and seek solutions. ===
Posted by: DV | September 21, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
Obama campaign national security spokesperson Wendy Morigi stated “Barack Obama has never urged a delay in negotiations.”
But on June 16, 2008 2:22 PM, NBC’s Domenico Montanaro reported this statement by Obama:
=== He said he told Zebari that negotiations for a Status of Forces agreement or strategic framework agreement between the two countries should be done in the open and with Congress’s authorization and that it was important that that there be strong bipartisan support for any agreement so that it can be sustained through a future administration. He argued it would make sense to hold off on such negotiations until the next administration. ===
Posted by: DV | September 21, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
You wrote that Obama campaign national security spokesperson Wendy Morigi stated “Barack Obama has never urged a delay in negotiations.”
But on June 16, 2008 2:22 PM, NBC’s Domenico Montanaro reported that Obama did indeed urge a delay in negotiations. You can read it for yourself
Posted by: DV | September 21, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Only ten days ago, the pan-Arab daily Asharq al-Awsat quoted a statement by Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari. Zebari described the June 2008 conversation between him and Obama. In June, Obama said the same thing to Zebari that Amir Taheri reported in the New York Post.
Posted by: DV | September 21, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am
I think mcCain and Palin are just nervous that Obama has already talked with American allies. mcCains lobbist see a loss of their personal foreign bank accounts, and may have to invest in America, when Obama wins. McCain has almost picked a fight with our Ally Spain. At least the spanish newspapers understands, ‘he is getting old’. Ouch.
Even Palins ‘shoot first’, idea is being talked about in other countries. Duck Tape, please.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 21, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
More and more middle Republicans are voting Obama, not because he is Democrat, but because McCain is being led by his Far Right Tycoons. Republicans, like me feel he is letting his lobbiest speak for him, which has been giving McCain a bad rep. He needs to come closer to middle America and fight for a long term American way, and not side with his ‘quick buck’ lobbiests. Even the unions are starting to look at a long term effect, McCain can not support. We are starting to discuss, his non support for education issues at a younger level. It starts when the children are at a young age. Not just in high school. Obama has a support of military families, that want to see their sons and daughters again. Thank you Obama, for giving us a ‘hope’, in America, again.
Posted by: historyforgotten | September 21, 2008, 3:35 am 3:35 am
If this were reversed and a republican nominee had gone against a sitting democrat president in this manner, there would be no end to the howling of the mainstream media. I believe that the mainstream media has become truly dangerous to the country and I thank you, Mr. Tapper, for not toeing their line.
Posted by: KathyYou know what s | September 21, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
So “Strategic Framework Agreement ” being delayed is ok ??
That’s what the ABCNEWS thinks is acceptable?
Why can’t that be done NOW?
Posted by: Brian | September 21, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
Obama: Married to 1 woman for 19 years. 2 sweet kids. 1 car. 1 house. 3 yrs as director of Developing Communities Project. 10+ yrs Senior Lecturer of Constitutional Law (U. of Chicago), Columbia U. grad (poli sci/int’l relations), Harvard Law magna c.um laude and Editor of the Harvard Law Review. 9 yrs as civil rights atty. Senator in 5th largest state for 8 yrs, spnsring 823 bills, srvng as chrmn Health&Human Svcs Cmtee. US Senator since ’05, serving on cmtees: Foreign Relations; Enviro&Public Works, Vets’ Affairs; Health, Ed, Labor&Pensions; Homeland Security; Gvnmntl Affairs. Chrmn of subcmtee on Euro.Affairs, w/trips to Europe, MidEast, Africa. Spnsrd/cospnsrd hundreds of bills.
Posted by: ukenuke | September 22, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I have to wonder, if the allegations against Obama are not true, why is there no prosecution of those making the false claims? If they are true, why is there no prosecution of Obama? Could it merely be another case of the DC insiders looking after their own?
Posted by: Jon Weiss | October 1, 2008, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Let’s look at part of the article. “According to Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari”, Obama made his demand for delay a key theme of his discussions with Iraqi leaders in Baghdad in July.
“He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the US elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington,” Zebari said in an interview.
Obama insisted that Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of US troops – and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its “state of weakness and political confusion.”
According to being the most important part of this article. This was a second hand account of a conversation between a group of people. Three of the individuals in the room back Obama’s version and one individual gives an account to a reporter and he in turn writes a story.
People, in addition to Obama and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, this July meeting was attended by Bush administration officials, such as U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker and the Baghdad embassy’s legislative affairs advisor Rich Haughton, as well as a Republican senator, Chuck Hagel of Nebraska.
Hagel is a honorable man along with our Ambassador and there is no evidence to repudiate this.
Even if you don’t like Obama, come on, you have to believe those folks. So stop the nonsense!
PS: For the record, I am a Republican!
Posted by: sputnee | October 16, 2008, 3:13 am 3:13 am
Folks there were other people there, credible people, who back Obama account of what happened. The story written by this reporter was a “second” hand account of what happened. There is no reason to “bash” our ambassador to Iraq and Sen Hagel because he doesn’t support what you wan’t, he is a honorable man.
As far as some of you talking about Obama getting 95% of the African American vote. Stop listening to the media. Traditionally, Dem’s get the same numbers even though they have a white candidate, so it is unimportant. If Obama losses, it will be because people disagree with his stance on issues, no race.
If McCain losses, it will be because he failed to get his point across to the American people and he picked “No Brains” for a VP.
This is all coming from a African American Republican, who after reading posting from my Republican brotheren, truely understand why minorities will feel the way they do about us. Instead of staying on message, we attack and that is just wrong. Even when confronted with the truth, if we don’t like the person, we cannot admit we are wrong. This is what has been wrong with our current Republican administration.
I have served my country for 23 years and I love it so. I hope one day, it loves me the same way.
Posted by: Sputnee | October 16, 2008, 3:22 am 3:22 am
There are many picks available for gathering an education these days,you can buy term paper or buy research papers which is intereating news for those who have not yet directed. sincerely, essays writing is not an easy product so try make right adjustment between making on yor own or to buy an essay. Maybe you need help with original investigation , maybe you want help in producing a fresh plan on a case that is vast and dificult.
Posted by: Andrew Lukas | September 4, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Obama is a FRAUD! It is NOT McCain that blew the whistle on this “story” – but – the Iraq leaders.
SO…..who should we believe???
Once again – obama will have a spin on what he really means. – DISGRACE
Posted by: Chanel | June 1, 2010, 3:30 am 3:30 am
You guys are hilarious. All of you. I have read many of these comments, and none of them have convinced me to change my vote.
Posted by: Gucci | June 1, 2010, 3:31 am 3:31 am