Sep 12, 2008 12:27pm
What Passes for a Rave Review
Rep. Zach Wamp, R-Tenn., on Gov. Sarah Palin’s performance last night: "Gov. Palin is confident, smart, disciplined, and while not yet totally prepared on the issues, she clearly is getting there. … The country likes her so she will get a pass or two. If she holds up beyond that, she could be a transformative woman in American history. If not, we will all be disappointed."
- jpt
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
Republican….
Tennessee…..
Enough said.
Laughable.
No fun in being stupid if you cant show it.
Posted by: Omentum | September 12, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
“while not yet totally prepared on the issues, she clearly is getting there”
I don’t want someone who is getting there as VP. I want someone who IS there.
Especially when the top of the ticket is a 4 time cancer survivor with war wounds who would be the oldest President ever inaugurated.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
lol
McCain/Palin can RUN, but they can’t HIDE.
Not this time.
Posted by: Nobodys fool | September 12, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Deeply, meaningfully unimpressive. Charlie Gibson is more prepared for the Vice Presidency. My City Councilwoman is more prepared for the Vice Presidency.
Posted by: squintz | September 12, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
“she could be a transformative woman in American history.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | September 12, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
I can’t believe I live in this country.
I wonder how many conservative “thinkers,” like say a David Brooks type, will ultimately vote for Obama when they are in the privacy of the voting booth.
I can’t believe we “give passes” like this to someone who could be POTUS. This country is suicidal.
Posted by: anon | September 12, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
So, Belle, voting for a woman just because she is a woman is just as sexist as NOT voting for her only because she is a woman.
Posted by: kitty | September 12, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Gov. Palin looked very competent in the full length version of the interview that aired on Nightline. The edited version with her truncated answers on ABC News with Charlie Gibson made a different impression- eager but a lightweight- in the condensed version.
Having seen both, the full length version was much better for Palin. It’s too bad that most reports today were filed on the shorter version and not from Nightline where her full length answers were heard in entirety.
Posted by: Anne | September 12, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
she’s a hell of alot more knowledge about than obama,
how’s that ‘president’ of canada, barry?
Posted by: trettione | September 12, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
I think JPT’s blog is a good indication that Egobama is in trouble. Everyday we continue to spend talking about Palin is a great day for McCain.
Posted by: padhorn | September 12, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
John McCain enrages me. As a Clinton supporter, I initally liked Sarah Palin, but every day that goes by she shows her arrogance, her incompetence, and her profound shallowness. I live in Ohio, and John McCain stands there with Sarah Palin, asking for an orchard of votes and offering an apple in return. I watched Palin’s performance and found it utterly unacceptable and very nearly nauseating.
Posted by: sylvie2566 | September 12, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Congratulations to Charlie for staying focused on issues, this is what the American people need, she is not qualified she has no views of her own, my excitement about her is no more
Posted by: Cecilia | September 12, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Palin may not have traveled to “57 states” as Obama has. She may not know who the Penn State Nittaly Lions are. But she’s damn impressive.
Posted by: padhorn | September 12, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Do you know the difference between the Bush/Cheny and McCain/Palin team?
LIPSTICK!!!!
Four more years of the same. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!
OBAMA/BIDEN ’08
Posted by: jsmith5509 | September 12, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
anon, the Congressman from TN would give her NO pass if she was a Dem…funny how that works huh?
Posted by: kitty | September 12, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Obviously, Palin was coached to say the things that she had to say, as Charlie calls it ” Blizzard of words”. Indeed, she is an smart woman, but not smart enough to run the country if McCain ever passes from presidency. She has to much of her own drama to handle( low acheiving husband, pregnant teen, baby with down syndrome which needs alot of attention–I know because I am a nurse) to handle the so called dramas of this country.
Posted by: NGuzman | September 12, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Sarah Palin did a hell of alot better than Barack Obama ever does in these interviews. She was much more assertive, lucid, knowledgeable, Presidential.
Not once did she tilt her head in an award position, reach out to touch the interviewer and mumble, stammer, hem and haw the way Obama does.
Posted by: OxyCon | September 12, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Can someone at ABC please post the *entirety* of Palin’s response on Nightline to the Pakistan border question?
Every clip I have seen edits out te part where she says the situation across the border “illustrates why we must win in Afghanistan”.
This answer more than anything else she said, more than the Bush Doctrine, showed me that she has less understanding of how the border situation affects success in Afghanistan than someone who recently picked up an issue of Newsweek at the dentist’s office.
Posted by: Alpha Female | September 12, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Scary to think woman are voting for her because she is a woman.She has no clue how to run this country and all the jerks that vote for that ticket just remember when we go to war again who did you vote for??????
Posted by: scared American | September 12, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Palin is still far ahead of Obumma! The truth is that no matter how inexperienced they say she is, Obama’s lack of anything substatial besides being a community organizer makes him far worse! I laugh when they poke fun at her and ignore the fact that she still has more executive experience than he does. If she isn’t ready to lead then what the hell does that make
Obumma??!!
Posted by: Ed | September 12, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
5 schools in 6 years… lol country first, cmon she cant even put school first
Posted by: Bhrandon | September 12, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Look, for any gaffe Palin maded last night, there are about a dozen that Obama has made & he is running for the TOP of the ticket.
Posted by: kelly | September 12, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
“while not yet totally prepared on the issues, she clearly is getting there”
This ‘Lady” will be totally prepared when she moves to Washington. She is a real “quick study”. Just wait old Joe will be asking her to sit down.
Posted by: MEW | September 12, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
The media are criticizing Palin and examining her words much more than the other male candidates.
- What experience in foreign policy had Jimmy Carter apart from being governor of Georgia?
- What experience in foreign policy had Ronald Reagan apart from being governor of California?
- What experience in foreign policy had Bill Clinton apart from being governor of Arkansas?
- What experience in foreign policy had George Bush jr. apart from being governor of Texas?
- What experience in foreing policy has Mr. America community organizer? oh yes, he made an speech in Berlin and visited the troops in Afghanistan. That´s a lot of ´qualification´.
Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 12, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Stop focusing on Palin.
How many decisions does the VP make?
Answer is 0!!!!
Americans are hurting the worst since 1929 and what is the media doing? They can’t focus on a single issue that is important to us.
Posted by: Juanita | September 12, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Sarah Palin is more aligned to Bush’s policies that McCain.
That is real scary, imagine another Bush in the White House.
OBAMA/BIDEN ’08
Posted by: jsmith5509 | September 12, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
What is the difference between Jimmy Carter and Barack Obama? Carter was a governor and a peanut farmer.
Posted by: Ed | September 12, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
scared American
You are so right, as well as the fact the both McCain and Palin believe that “everyone” should serve their country in war. So since we are so tapped already for troops, they will reactivate the “Draft” and it’s open season on all able body americans.
Posted by: fempharoh08 | September 12, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Expect more of your candidates. The litmus should not be that she simply didn’t mess up. Did she shine or not? Did she use sound logic or seem to be avoiding questions?
Posted by: Stacey | September 12, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
The ultimate contradiction… Straight from McCain on Governors and Mayors handling national security. Wakeup people he just picked Palin to win the votes of women. Unfortuanately, lots of women only voting for McCain is because he selected a woman. Regardless of his track record in supporting Bush policies %90.
Posted by: clearthought | September 12, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
How anyone can condemn Palin as VP and praise Obama as President is beyond me.
Think about this. Obama chose Biden to shore him up. Obama could stand alone at any minute without Biden’s guidance.
Even if McCain has another recurrence of cancer, there would be plenty of time to prepare for an administration without him.
Now there are always variables which we could talk about all day long. For instance, Obama could suddenly be unable to serve and Biden could have to step in (read the obituaries to see how many 40-year-olds are dying from stress-related illnesses).
Bottom line. Neither ticket has a monopoly on worst-case scenarios for the opposing team.
Posted by: marylou | September 12, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Palin is just the prettiest face in politics since Jackie Kennedy.
A little short on topics, but never the less pretty.
More of George Bush, but never the less pretty.
Posted by: rebecca | September 12, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Yes – she’s definitely a transformative woman.
I am a Republican who has long admired John McCain – but Palin’s performance seals the perception that her selection is the most recent in a series of decisions that lead me to question the senator’s judgment.
I am perplexed.
I don’t know if Senator McCain is just playing to the extremes for politics, and will return on inauguration to the courageous, pragmatic champion of integrity and clear thinking he once was, or if these might be his true colors – or maybe a sign of the slippage that comes with age.
Even if John McCain governs more rationally than he campaigns (and we have no assurance of that) I am frightened to think Governor Palin would succeed him if the unthinkable happens.
I’m giving serious thought to whether we would be better off with an Obama administration.
Posted by: Stephen Gerringer | September 12, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
meanwhile, Joe what’s his name is telling someone in a wheelchair to stand up.
Posted by: geevill | September 12, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
It is truly amazing about the rage over Palin.
All you have to do is see the interview to realize that she is McCain’s window dressing and that if they are elected you will realize that when you go into the store there will be nothing there.
This is starting to be dangerous…
Posted by: for-obama | September 12, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
“meanwhile, Joe what’s his name is telling someone in a wheelchair to stand up”
Yes he did.
But Biden knows what the Bush doctrine is and can answer questions without repeating a script.
Biden is ready to be VP.
I doubt Palin ever will be.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
McCain’s quote, “I am prepared. I need no on-the-job training. I wasn’t a mayor for a short period of time. I wasn’t a governor for a short period of time.”
Posted by: clearthought | September 12, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Palin took some tough questioning last night and didn’t stutter once, unlike Obama.
Posted by: John | September 12, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
It’ll be interesting to see if Palin’s deer-in-the-headlights performance on foreign policy starts being reflected in the polls in a few days, as it starts to sink in just how unprepared she is for such high office. Are people going to find her uninformed (trying to bluff about the Bush Doctrine) and arrogant (“didn’t blink”)? If you can get rolled by Charles Gibson — Charles Gibson — how are you going to hold up in the company of Putin, Medvedev, Hu, Merkel, Saakashvili, Chavez, etc? Then again, maybe I’m the only independent voters to whom this matters.
Posted by: Pacific moderate | September 12, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
I like her. So what if she doesn’t know much about international politics. She understands me. She’s a hocky mom. And just because she wants to be the second most powerful person in the nation, why should she have to know much about diplomacy?
I’d rather have a woman who is just like me rather than a highly qualified Vice President!
Posted by: Too Gullible | September 12, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
“How many decisions does the VP make?
Answer is 0!!!!”
As clueless about what the VP does as Palin is.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
marylou, How anyone can condemn Obama and praise Palin as VP is beyond me. The woman only parrots talking points taught to her. Want to know what she really thinks, read some of her PAST statements, creationism in schools, no environmental protections, the earth is there for exploitation and crusader war.
McCain is 72 years old, she very well may become president sooner than you think and she certainly will be run by the neo-cons next.
Posted by: JR | September 12, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I got tired of these Palin criticisms long ago. Let’s make a deal Obama supporters….you have the right to criticize Palin’s foreign policy experience, however, in the same post, you MUST defend Obama’s foreign policy experience, which, in case you haven’t noticed, is ZERO……
Otherwise, you are just a hypocrite, look foolish, and just bring more attention to the fact that Obama is completely unprepared and dangerous to be President.
Posted by: decentAmerican | September 12, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
pacific moderate,
You bring up a good point on the don’t blink part.
It was as if she was saying once you choose a course of action you follow thru no matter who right or wrong you are.
That was kind of scary.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
decentAmerican,
Again, its not Palin’s lack of actual experience its her general cluelessness of foriegn policy period.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
We deserve to have soemone who is ready to take over on day One! even a crash course will not be enough. Here what our own government says about people with recurrent melanoma:
Recurrent Melanoma
Treatment for recurrent melanoma depends on where the cancer came back, which treatments the patient has already received, and other factors. As with Stage IV melanoma, treatment usually cannot cure melanoma that recurs. Palliative care is often an important part of the treatment plan. Many patients have palliative care to ease their symptoms while they are getting anticancer treatments to slow the progress of the disease. Some receive only palliative care to improve their quality of life by easing pain, nausea, and other symptoms.
Posted by: fempharoh08 | September 12, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Palin has miserably failed her first test, despite all the coaching and briefing by the WBush Cabinet, she came out as an F student. She does not deserve to be selected as a candidate for VP specially whith a presidential candidate who has one foot in his grave. God save America from McSame and Srah Palin.
Posted by: BKMC | September 12, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Well folks…Any kind of publicity is good. Even bad publicity…for a while.
Palin won’t be able to hide her blatant inexperience for long. She can’t keep her mouth shut THAT long. McCain right now is riding off HER coat tails. Biden will make her head spin in the VP debate. Obama rode off celebrity for a long, long time, and now the media is tired of his parade. Now it’s the Sarah Palin circus. She’s got a juggling act, a magic act with smoke and mirrors and acrobatics with plenty of flip flops. Her supporters are going to LOVE her no matter what she does. Just like the Obama supporters who are incredulous about her appointment.
Posted by: Quorum | September 12, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Does this woman’s lack of knowledge on foreign policy not make the GOP just a “little” nervous? No true patriot would put someone with such little experience that close to the presidency. Party Before Country, that should be the GOP’s new slogan.
Posted by: independent | September 12, 2008, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
It has been repeatedly said that Alaska is littered with the proverbial “carcasses” of experienced politicians who underestimated Governor Palin. I am no ready to write her off.
As for Senator Biden, he has many years of experience, but in most areas, including foreign policy, he has repeatedly made bad judgments and been on the wrong side of issues.
Of course, then there is Senator Obama who has almost no experience that is applicable to duties of a executive/leader.
Like it or not, McCain is the only viable choice. I guess we have to hope he lives as long as his 94-year-old mother.
Posted by: bhurst | September 12, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
I watched the interview on the World News and found Charlie Gibson’s attitude upsetting. To me, he tried (maybe not consciously) to intimidate Sarah Pelin, I thought she met the challenge well.
Did anyone put the same questions to Obama? After all, he is pretty much in the same boat, for that matter, the current president or Bill Clinton too, had no real experience before taking office, but because they are “MAN”, that they were assumed to be READY or ABLE?
If anyone says they get straight YES or NO answers to their questions from a politician, they are either not listening or lying.
Posted by: Try to be Fair | September 12, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Republicans: “Give her a pass on her ignorance on critical economic and foreign policy issues.
Any attempt to probe her record — her request that all town employees offer a letter of resignation as a ‘sign of loyalty’ — the way she hired a former staffer of Mr. Pork Ted Stevens as a Washington lobbyist (for a town of 7000!) — her persuit of a million dollar repaving earmark for an airport that sees 80 flights a year — her support for the ‘bridge to nowhere’ — her lies about the bridge to nowhere repeated at every stop — her mission to bring hundred of millions in federal earmarks, MORE THAN ANY OTHER STATE, to Alaska — and oh by the way, her PRAISE for Barack Obama’s energy policy — All of this is somehow sexist!
Can anyone seriously say that John McCain was thinking of the welfare of the country when he made this choice?
Posted by: John | September 12, 2008, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
“I’m giving serious thought to whether we would be better off with an Obama administration.”
I’m giving serious consideration to Paris Hilton and The Snufflupagus.
So I have to choose between a VP who is weak on knowing the latest TV buzz terms (there is no Bush Doctrine as policy; that term was made up by the talking heads) or a President who has no credible foreign policy experience and says we have 57 states?
That’s easy.
All the answer proved is Palin doesn’t watch as much TV as Charlie does. When you consider the quality of TV news these days, that’s a plus in the Palin column.
Posted by: len | September 12, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Now that BHO is getting tough I guess he will go from fighting like a 4th grader to fighting like 10th grader.
I heard Keith Olbermann suggested he firmly say “Enough” more often.
Taking advice from Keith Olbermann?
Posted by: sally | September 12, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
At this stage of my life, my concern is for the future of our children and grandchildren. We are so bogged down with childish issues that mask what this election is all about. Sarah was a ploy to divert the issues. You can’t fight or disagree with her without repercussions about her being a woman. If you choose to be in this arena, gloves are off – it’s everyone for themselves – defending what they believe in. I picture her with a child on her hip, wearing hockey equipment, a halo over her head, a rifle on her shoulder and her foot on a moose. Come on America is this what we want to represent our country JUST BECAUSE SHE IS A WOMAN? McCain is too old and Sarah is to dangerous!!
Posted by: senior | September 12, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Good thing Charlie didn’t pull out a map and ask Palin to identify Iraq.
The Republicans know their star is falling fast. She’ll probably stay hidden now except for interviews with FOX.
As long as Palin doesn’t have to answer any real questions, she’s ok. Give her lead-in questions so she can regurgitate pre-rehersed answers and she’s fine. Give her a sarcastic speech written by Bush speechwriters and she can act the part.
Ms PALIN, You’re 15 minutes are almost up. Enjoy the spotlight while you can!
Posted by: GOP 4 ever | September 12, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Your wrong its not 85% its 95% of Americans get a tax beak under Obama!
But it doesnt mater McCain and Palin have Fox News on side…
Fox News reports Obama will raise taxes 100′s of times a day!
While its true 95% of every day Americans will get a tax break under Obama… Fox News can legaly say that he will raise taxes they just dont mention that its only on the top 1%..
Result more Americans get there News from Fox News…
GOP wins..
Q. Who started the Obama/muslim rumour ?
A. Fox News !
GOP Wins..
Q. Who started the rumour Bush beat Gore ?
A. Fox News
GOP wins
Q. Did Palin lie ?
A. OBAMA’S SEXIST!
GOP WINS
MCCAIN AND PALIN GET CAUGHT LYING
MEDIA REPORTS IT!
MCCAIN PALIN AND FOX NEWS SAY:
THE MEDIA IS IN BED WITH OBAMA!
GOP WINS
Posted by: GOP 08 | September 12, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
The Straight Talk Express is in the slow lane waiting for a script.
Posted by: DTNC | September 12, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
I’m glad Palin chose Gibson. He is a tough interviewer and it will only make her better.
If BO got all his foreign experience in one week overseas Palin can top that. She won’t waste time on an unAmerican Berlin speech.
And I bet she will visit the wouned troops.
Posted by: riley | September 12, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Over and over again right wingers are whining about Palin being asked tough question while at the same time they tell us she is ready for the big job.
They do not see a contradiction.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Based on Obama’s pattern of hanging out with terrorist and his 20 years with a man that curses America….
I would trust my dog more with the safety of this country than Obama.
It’s no wonder other countries want him to win. They want a weaker America and so does BO.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 12, 2008, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
“while not yet totally prepared on the issues, she clearly is getting there”
I don’t want someone who is getting there as VP. I want someone who IS there.
Especially when the top of the ticket is a 4 time cancer survivor with war wounds who would be the oldest President ever inaugurated.
Posted by: Ryan C | Sep 12, 2008 12:32:49 PM
Well, I hate to disappoint you, but your ticket has never been there. Its too bad you head is where it shouldnt be when it comes respecting experience. well, your candidates dont have it, so I guess you cant respect it. sorry, about that. better luck in 2012..next time come back with respect and maybe someone will give a hoot about what you think.
Posted by: she will | September 12, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
What the? This is like Biden…
Posted by: John | September 12, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
If I buy Zach Wamp – R-TENN argument:
Mr. Putin? Ahmadinejad?,
Uh…I’m not prepared just yet on the issues, but am a “transformative woman”. Can I get a pass or two on this international policy stuff?
Posted by: Puhlease.... | September 12, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Just remember when you vote for Palin you get McCain, well I think anyway.
Posted by: Thinking | September 12, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Look at len pretend the Bush Doctrine is non existent.
From 2002
President Bush’s emerging doctrine advocating pre-emptive military strikes against America’s adversaries or terrorists possessing weapons of mass destruction could lead to unintended, and in some cases disastrous, consequences, defense analysts warn.
Since Bush outlined his new security doctrine earlier this month at West Point, N.Y., Iraq has been identified as the first potential target of a preventative U.S. war, in this case to pre-empt the possibility of dictator Saddam Hussein attacking the U.S. with biological, chemical or nuclear weapons.
More from 2002
As a presidential candidate two years ago, George W. Bush called for a degree of humility in our dealings with other nations. Since Mr. Bush took office, it has often been hard to locate that sentiment in his foreign policy. The latest and most definitive articulation of his views, published on Friday, reflects a good deal more modesty and generosity than earlier expressions, but it also bristles with bald assertions of American power. Mr. Bush’s Texas supporters may like it — he instructed his staff to write it in plain English so ”the boys in Lubbock” could read it — but it is sure to make the rest of the world uneasy, including America’s closest allies.
The tension between idealism and realism in foreign policy runs through America history, and the fault lines are evident in Mr. Bush’s policy statement. The paper — a policy summation that every president is required to submit to Congress — seems in some sections to be animated by the most enlightened and constructive impulses of the land of Jefferson, Lincoln and the Marshall Plan. It dedicates the nation to extending the benefits of freedom, democracy, prosperity and the rule of law to struggling countries around the globe. Mr. Bush speaks eloquently in an introductory letter about working with other nations to combat disease and alleviate poverty, and he reaffirms his determination to increase American foreign aid.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Please…don’t even compare her women who have fought for years for their rights. She will get Roe vs Wade revearsed and cause women to be set back years.
I cannot believe ANY women would go for her crap…she isn’t for women..she is there to promote herself, and her religiously radical agenda…
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Sally seems agitated.
I guess she didn’t see the over hyped soccer mom crashing back to earth.
It’s just so mean to ask some basic questions that relate directly to the job Palin claims she’s qualified to do.
How sexist is that?
Posted by: Awe, poor bulldog | September 12, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
She started off her VP nomination with lies, she has continued with the lies, McCain continues with the lies….
and now?
She can’t handle an interview
She has been flip flopping around like a halibut out of water and now she is running out of air…
What s horrible joke she has become.
Palin, “The Candidate to Nowhere”
Posted by: l | September 12, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Journalists, If you want the American people to have any faith in your reporting, please, please look back through your notes from college re “biased reporting” and yellow journalism”. Mr. Gibson, a well respected journalist, is usually better than this. Why did he spend the entire interview acting like he didn’t believe Governor Palin–and would repeat her words back to her with just enough slant as to be misleading. On global warming, for instance, she did NOT “soften her stance”. She very clearly said that human activities could certainly have a role in global warming—-along with the normal weather cycles over the span of history. She did NOT say that she didn’t believe humans had ANY part–just that human COULD be A part of the whole picture. Good gracious, any first year journalism student–or any American with a brain could figure out what she was saying. Please, in order to save the credibility of your profession, keep your personal feelings and inclinations out of your reporting. Save your comments for the water cooler.
Posted by: Momentum1 | September 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
What I want to know is what happens if she is convicted of this troopergate deal?
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Omentum…the issue is McCain has had cancer a few times and is in his 70′s…
She could be the President!!!
PLus, as VP she will be representing us on other countries….YEzzz. wake up!!!
Posted by: formerhillary | September 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Hum — the McCain/Palin bounce seems to be getting higher and higher – almost as if it weren’t a bounce at all.
Meanwhile, the viscous Obama campaign zeroes in on McCain’s computer illiteracy. Funny, funny, funny!
Posted by: dl | September 12, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
Any other right wingers want to claim the Bush doctrine is some made up term?
There’s even a right wing website called the bushdoctrine org that says we have to stay in Iraq and go after Iran.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
People are worried about Palin’s lack of foreign experience even though she’s just the VP.
But they totally ignore Obama’s friendships with people that hate America.
30% of Americans think he shares Rev Wright’s views. They wonder if Obama really loves America as he says.
Why is this race even close?
Posted by: harry | September 12, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Yeah Ryan C, Cheney hasn’t had ANY impact now has he? He just demonstrated how much damage a loose cannon as VP can do. Like $142 oil, well Cheney set up the “Bush” energy plan in 2000.
Posted by: JR | September 12, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
They should ask Sarah why for four years when Mayor her town charged women for their own rape kits. Who on earth would vote for this women!!!
Posted by: jen | September 12, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
I am lost…Who is running for GOP President??? McCain needs her to bring a crowd to him. But when the votes are cast and if he wins is he going to send her to her room and not let her out. My guess is YES!!!
Posted by: beck | September 12, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Ryan C
Over and over again right wingers are whining about Palin being asked tough question while at the same time they tell us she is ready for the big job.
They do not see a contradiction.
————————————–
Media bad Palin good!
Q. Did Palin lie ?
A. OBAMA’S SEXIST!
GOP WINS
MCCAIN AND PALIN GET CAUGHT LYING
MEDIA REPORTS IT!
MCCAIN PALIN AND FOX NEWS SAY:
THE MEDIA IS IN BED WITH OBAMA!
GOP WINS
Posted by: GOP 08 | September 12, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
“People are worried about Palin’s lack of foreign experience even though she’s just the VP.”
One of the VP’s jobs is meeting with foreign leaders (like Cheney going to Georgia).
Lack of foreign policy experience coupled with lack of foreign knowledge is a bad combination.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
McCain doesn’t know how to email.
Obama’s new tough talk!
Still fighting like a 4th grader
Posted by: sally | September 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Just give her a pass on the first couple wars she helps start. Perhaps she’ll have it figured out after that.
McCain let himself be pushed into picking Palin. That’s the “maverick”? He reversed his own positions on things “he could not do in good conscience” just two years ago? Who actually runs rhe Republican Party?
If a 72 year-old man does not know where he stands on the issues, he should be nowhere near the Whitehouse.
Posted by: Bouce Up, Bouce DOWN | September 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
Ryan C, I too don’t want someone who is getting there as Pres. I want someone who IS there. That person is John McCain.
If I recall correctly, the same things were being said about BHO – the media always kept saying he is getting better with each debate with Hillary, and that she was doing him a favour by having the extended primaries. He was like a baby trying to swim in water when he first came on the scene. And he is still floudering in my opinion. Just an empty suit, and empty vessel!
Try to remember that Sarah is running for VP – not Pres. I know it is hard for you seeing that Sarah has a better resume and experience than the top of your ticket. Where is Joe who? Lol!
Posted by: Beckie | September 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
I’m an ardent supporter of Hillary Clinton. I am now a supporter of McCain/Palin.
My impression of the interview is as follows:
I had a very low expectation prior to the interview. Sarah exceeded my expectation. Prior to the interview, I wasn’t sure that she is ready to be commander-in-chief. After the interview, I have more confidence in her readiness to be CIC.
The take home message that I get from the interview is that she will do whatever is necessary to protect America and its allies from aggression. Nonetheless, war would always be the last resort for her.
Her steely calm gave me great confidence that in the face of danger, this is a leader that I want in charge of our military and as a matter of fact, I would trust her more than Bambi with the nucleat button.
It is my personal opinion that as a CIC, she will bring peace in the world through strength.
I grade her interview a solid A.
Posted by: bebe | September 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
cindy in nc…where are you getting your info? I guess you’re presuming those poor people in Chicago and the Senate in ILL. and Washington are terrorists.Probably a lot more prejudgeous than Wright….
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
decentamerican states “Obama’s foreign policy experience, which, in case you haven’t noticed, is ZERO……’
__________________________________________________
Obama introduced 10 bills in this last congressional session that were foreign policy based. 3 the session prior. In additions, there’s the Lugar-Obama Threat Reduction Bill; Iraq war de-escalation Act and much more. Obama is running against McCain and I am sorry your candidate made such a poor choice for VP. It hurts all Americans.
Posted by: Paige | September 12, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Seriously what happens if she is convicted of troopergate? Do you rightwinger types still like her then? does Mccain drop her? Do you see a problem with this abuse of power?
Why did she even ask about books being banned if she wasn’t contemplating it?
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
A pig with lipstick.
The four words that lost Obama the women’s vote.
How stupid was it for him to even go there?
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 12, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
riley…where have you been? Yezzz, Obama has done a lot more foreign travel than Palin even in the last year, and not just Berlin….BTW, we need to compare Obama to McCain not Palin….McCain is loving this. it is taking the heat off him…
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
jen
The asnwer to your question is because she took over a place with a large surplus and turnded it into a $33-$35m debt!
If they ask that question or provide that information Rove will fix it!
MCCAIN PALIN AND FOX NEWS SAY:
THE MEDIA IS IN BED WITH OBAMA!
Posted by: GOP 08 | September 12, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Beckie,
Obama is ready to be President.
I’m not sure John McCain ever was.
In response to the media not covering his campaign, he decided to go sleazy and negative.
He hires someone who smeared his daughter.
He has a temper going back years and years.
That shows he’s a hot head that puts his campaign before country and even his own family.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Sarah Palin did great! Why hasn’t the media focused on Obamas lack of foreign policy experience? According to him he is going down size our military, get rid of a missle defense program, which will leave us very vulneerable. Not to mention he’s for redistribution of wealth and having the government pay for people to do community service, HOW! I am very scared that we are heading to socialism, this is not what our founding fathers and fellow americans have given their lives for. Rememeber we live in a free country, I hope I can say that after the election. History repeats itself.
Posted by: pop | September 12, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
cindy in nc- Move on to Real issues/Real problems – McCain has made that statement at least 4 other times. Real women aren’t hypocrites either.
Posted by: Paige | September 12, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
I don’t know why Obama’s supporters on the one hand reject Palin for lack of experience and on the other one accept Obama despite of his huge void of experience.
Posted by: Obama-Yah-Wright | September 12, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
I could have done a better job in that interview! I hunt, fish, snowmobile, got my passport a couple months ago…
Live in Clancy Montana I should be his VP….
Wait I’m not that cute.
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
30% of Americans think he shares Rev Wright’s views. They wonder if Obama really loves America as he says.
Why is this race even close?
————————
Because those are the 30% who still think Bush has done a good job. They’re gullible morons who are the reason Carl Rove exists.
The other 70% are the smart enough to know they can’t believe everything they read. We can actually THINK for ourselves.
Palin’s dangerous lack of knowledge is frightening. McCain’s lack of economic knowledge is just as scary.
THIS TIME, WE VOTE FOR THE SMART GUY!
OBAMA 08!
Posted by: Bouce Up, Bouce DOWN | September 12, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Speaking of cancer, lung cancer is pretty fast and deadly. Why is no one talking about Obama’s smoking? Doesn’t that say something about his ability to make good choices? And pulease, practically no one wanted Biden for president. So if Obama bit the dust, we’d be stuck with the guy practically nobody wants.
Posted by: Kitty | September 12, 2008, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
cindy in nc….McCain went there also….I guess this is a perocial saying. Da….grow up….even the Reps are saying it was not meant against Palin, but against McCain.
Posted by: newvoter | September 12, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
This was Palin-lite. I do not want to leave the country to my kids with someone like her at the helm. She just can’t cut it. This election might be a tough choice for some people but not me. I’ll take my chances on Obama/Biden.
Posted by: outtahere | September 12, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
“According to him he is going down size our military,”
This is a lie. Obama wants to expand the size of our military so that our soldiers don;t have to do 4 and 5 tours in hostile envorinments. He does want to cut wasteful defense projects (something McCain has discussed as well)
“get rid of a missile defense program, which will leave us very vulneerable”
We have spent over $100B for a missile defense system that does not work.
We would have been much better served using that money to secure nuclear material around the world lest it get in the hands of terrorists.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Fascinating. I watched and thought she did OK (fine being a comparative, as in – Obama did OK at Saddleback, McCain was OK at the convention). No tremendous highs, no breathtaking lows. She’s not Dan Quayle, she’s not Al Gore. What does that prove?
All of this talk about her “deer in the headlights” / “cramming” / etc misses the larger points, and I think serves to the detriment of actual political analysis (and betting on the Nov 4 outcome). –
1) Dems were waiting for her to flame-out – she didn’t
2) Of course she’s been cramming and talking to advisors — that’s what Pres/VPs/Senators etc do? Have you ever looked at who’s on your government’s payroll’s — decision-makers hire subject area experts to help inform them. Hate to break it to you, but Obama’s surrounded by them. So’s Biden. Why is Palin now suspect b/c she’s not been surrounded by them for years?
3) Her response on “DO you agree with the Bush Doctrine” was the best one possible strategically. [To presume she couldn't define the doctrine is facile] There’s a world of trouble in answering an open-ended question like that — she made Gibson get more specific so she could provide a more specific answer. No gotcha – common sense in dealing with the rapacious press.
4) the “gotchas” are inane to the point of silliness -
so most VPs in the past 30 yrs have met atleast one head of state? In the words of Obama primary supporters – if being first lady and having tea isn’t a qualification for president, then how is being in the same room with a foreign leader or even talking to a few on occasion, a qualification for VP?
so she won’t commit to crossing into Pakistan, or actions in Afghanistan, or specifics about GWOT — all of these issues depend on facts on the ground at the time a decision needs to be made. Her general answer gives sense of direction; she’d be an idiot to provide a roadmap of IF-THEN.
5) All of the questions about her church prayers are over the top. The ability of the Dems to turn on people who pray for, and hope to have, God’s will/support is astounding. If you see something wrong with that, perhaps you should turn in all of your US currency — wouldn’t want you to be caught trusting in God.
Posted by: ENF | September 12, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Hi, Ryan C re “blinking”: “It was as if she was saying once you choose a course of action you follow thru no matter who right or wrong you are. That was kind of scary.”
Yes, it reminds me of our foreign policy over the past several years.
decentAmerican: “you have the right to criticize Palin’s foreign policy experience, however, in the same post, you MUST defend Obama’s foreign policy experience”
What has many Americans concerned isn’t so much Palin’s lack of experience, but her obvious lack of knowledge and interest on the topic. She had no clue what the Bush Doctrine is, despite that having been the justification for invading Iraq. As of several weeks ago in an interview, she’d only vaguely heard about the surge from “the news”. She couldn’t even BS her way through Gibson’s question credibly, or be honest enough to admin she didn’t get the reference. Whatever Obama’s experience level, the past several months of campaigning and media interviews have dispelled any concern I have about his knowledge and interest on foreign policy, and his ability to function on the international stage.
Posted by: Pacific moderate | September 12, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
kitty…we all want to feel confident that if the president cannot fufill his term that the VP cn step in. Someone who sits in a motel room for 5 days and is fed info, if not ready to be even a cabinet member let alone the president in these dangerous times.
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
For her first interview I thought Palin held up well against a tough
interviewer.
Her strength is energy, reform, budgets.
She’s only going to get better and better and that’s what scares BHO.
She has a proven record of reform–something BO doesn’t have.
Posted by: sally | September 12, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Joe
She should get convicted on trooper gate. She did it!
Fox already has that covered! We have been told the guy stungunned a teenage boy and should have been on the police force!
Today the are telling us the democrats are scared of Palin and the democrats are out to get her! “Shes heating up the campaign and now the democrats are heating up the witch hunt”
Palin is being attacked for being good!
Never mind they started investergating her long before she was made VP.
Democrats bad Media bad
Palin good!
HE HE HE
She get away with a crime and still get to be VP!
Rove serves his nation again!
GOP wins!
Posted by: GOP 08 | September 12, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Look at this defense system from the other side of things. Would you want the Russians putting up a missle “defense” system in Cuba?
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Aren’t we voting for a President?
We better get wise and think about America and what might happen. Think back before 9/11…who destroyed the communication between the FBI, CIA and other organizations that were to keep us safe. That person is giving advice to a Pres candidate; and his wife could very well become the Pres in 2012 or even maybe the VP candidate in 2008. Good ‘old Joe’ might ask her to standup.
This is serious stuff folks!!!!
Posted by: MEW | September 12, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Before his Evita-style Rainbow Tour, had Barack Obama met any foreign heads of state? I honestly don’t know.
Look, Sarah Palin directed negotiations with Canada (a foreign country, last time I checked), Canadian regional and municipal governments, Native American tribes, and municipalities within her own state to create a new $40 billion pipeline. What has Obama done in his entire career to match that one achievement?
That Sarah Palin — who has served in local and statewide legislative and executive offices during her career — has little foreign-policy experience as an absolute measure is indisputable. But relative to Barack Obama she looks pretty good, and she makes a lot more sense than either Obama or Joe Biden.
After all, when Russia invaded its democratic neighbor Georgia (a country that, being in Europe, falls into the portfolio of the Senate subcommittee of which Barack Obama is the chairman — but which has never met since he took over), Barack Obama came out with a dishwater condemnation of both sides that it took him three days of revising to make sound coherent and informed.
On 9/12/2001 Joe Biden suggested that, to show good faith to the Arab world after the previous day’s attacks, we should send a $200 million check to Iran — despite Iran being a major sponsor of terrorism, being involved in an arms deal (of which we vocally disapproved) of comparable size to that check with the Russians, and being Persian — NOT Arab — and in fact actively hostile toward almost all of its Arab neighbors.
Barack Obama’s experience in foreign policy consists of little more than showing up (sometimes) and being wrong — and in a tenure so short he himself said in 2004 he was unqualified to run for President in 2008. Joe Biden with three decades’ experience in the Senate thought sending a blank check to Iran might placate the Arab world.
It’s a free country. Feel free to savage Sarah Palin and belittle her experience. But if you back Obama/Biden, you’ve got nothing to feel superior about.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Yea but that teenage boy asked him to do it. He wanted to check it out. It;s not like the guy was walkin down the street and randomly tazered some kid. Haven’t any of you been teenage boys?
I have I used to do stupid crap like that all the time.
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
pacific…that is why he chose Joe Biden as his VP…
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
I don’t care if she sat there cleaning her rifle and didn’t answer one question.
I trust her more that Obama.
He is not what he pretends to be.
Posted by: riley | September 12, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Sarah stood up well…..under Charlie’s “interrogation”….it was not a good interview…he was only looking for an opportunity to “trip her” and get the glory.
It was not the quality of a journalistic interview we had hoped for. Bob Shiefer (sp) would have been great.
When will the press “get it?”
Posted by: lois l | September 12, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
So the Republicans are saying that their VP candidate is “not yet totally prepared on the issues”? Bill Clinton is right. With this kind of opposition, Obama will win and win pretty handily
Posted by: tony | September 12, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
ZZ, are you saying someone who smokes is making a good choice? Really, is that where you are going?
Posted by: Kitty | September 12, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Gov. Palin is connecting to mothers because they say that she is “like them.” I am a middle aged professional woman and mother, and have even held local office, but I am not qualified to be President or Vice President. I am very worried about this nation if we continue to elect our national leaders because they are personable and likable. Frankly, we need our leaders to be well above average in intellect, in demeanor and in their ability to bring together the best minds of any political stripe to solve problems, meet challenges, handle emergencies, protect our country, strengthen our economy, support top-notch public education, serve as an international leader, international diplomat and international example………….Because someone is a mother, can shoot a gun or throw down a shot of whiskey……is female, male, black, white, or brown……….likes the color blue or owns a dog…….that is irrelevant to me. Who has the best grasp of this new age and has the facility to handle effectively the enormous and serious responsibilities embedded in being the President (and Vice President) of the United States…….that is what is most important to me. We are at such a critical juncture, and Sen. McCain has made it a joke. I have lost respect for him because he has sold his moderate, pragmatic, bi-partisan soul. I worry for our country if McCain/Palin win and this divisive, shallow, shoot-from-the hip, partisan attitude is any view into how they would actually govern and serve the American people.
Posted by: AWCG | September 12, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
dl…talk about negative campaigning, what about the ad McCain is running suggesting Obama wants to teach kids sex education before they can read? He actually supported a bill funding Citys and Towns to teach kids how to avoid preditors….
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Last time I checked Alqueda sent a warning to Iran. Sponser terror? This country needs to quit on the republican kool-aid! And we set Saddam Hussein up with his wmd’s in the 80′s more republican BS
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
cindyct, yes, that’s the spin they are putting on it anyway. the problem with that spin is you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.
Posted by: Kitty | September 12, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
cindyct, yes, that’s the spin they are putting on it anyway. the problem with that spin is you can put lipstick on a pig, but it’s still a pig.
Posted by: Kitty | September 12, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Hey Tapper,
I wonder when you’re gonna run that new story about Obama’s turn to negative politics:
1. Sends 30+ attorneys to Alaska to try to dig up dirt on Palin
2. Campaign head says Obama will now take the fight to McCain “but over issues that matter to Americans”. And yet the new ad by Obama criticizes McCain for not knowing how to use a computer.
Posted by: JA | September 12, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Lois…the press got it. They sent Gibson from ABC, one of the most “right” biased media networks. She got off easy. Let’s see her on O’Reilly!!!
If she is who she says she is, she shouldn’t worry about being “tripped up”…She says she’s ready, so let the games begin..
Posted by: formerhillary | September 12, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
kitty…I do not get what you mean?
Posted by: formerhillary | September 12, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I’m voting for John McCain for president.
By the time they are sworn in Palin will be more than ready. She’a fast learner, someone we can trust.
She’s one of us–something Obama never will be.
Posted by: harry | September 12, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Ja…sounds like what the Reps did to Obama when he started, doesn’t it?
Posted by: formerhillary | September 12, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Kitty, smoking is not illegal is it. I guess people that drink are making poor decisions too. Let’s see, what else can we come up with. If this is the case I guess 99% of this country makes bad decisions.
Posted by: zz | September 12, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
For all you who question Palin’s competence, please explain how she is different from Ronald Reagan in 1980? Okay, he was governor longer and a Hollywood star and of course a man. But they both went to small colleges (he went to Eureka) and had broadcast journalism gigs. He was always accused of being a stiff actor performing scripted speeches. If that’s what you think about Palin, she’ll do just fine. I want leaders who can learn the rights lines and communicate them effectively. I don’t want leaders who shoot from the hip and get off message (heard Biden lately?) I am not a huge Palin fan, but think that she is facing a much higher burden of proof about her competence as a leader because she is a woman and mother. Imagine if Palin had also been a Hollwood star. I usually vote Dem, but am giving the Republicans a chance this year and am very turned off by the assumptions and spin about Palin because she’s a woman. That is wrong and I’m happy to cast my vote against sexism in this election.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 12, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Harry what do you mean “one of us”?
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
McSame and Barbie will be the downfall of these united states. We are on the brink with the shrub and this duo will deliver the final blow. Write it down, if you allow your family to wait until the election is over it will be way to late. Palin is sharp as a wooden spoon!
Posted by: Daniel Plainview | September 12, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
harry…what do you mean, ” One of us” …what is your term for “one of us”?
Posted by: formerhillary | September 12, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
formerhillary — I would guess she’s referring to the fact that the bill that extended sex ed into kindergarten required that STDs and STD prevention be taught “at all levels”. Now, maybe no curriculum implementing that policy actually would go that far with kindergarteners, but that’s what the bill said. Saying it only was about good touch/bad touch is the lipstick.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Daniel………..GOOD ONE!!
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
“1. Sends 30+ attorneys to Alaska to try to dig up dirt on Palin”
Um John Fund made that up and can’t provide any evidence that this happened. Its been denied by the DNC.
I think its hilarious how the right wing demands the mainstream press cover lies they’ve been told by their right wing media.
Don’t you guys get tired of being embarrassed.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
she is NOTHINGNESS
Image, created for Campaign by Bush’s creators.
Moron in every sense.
Posted by: Linda,Fl | September 12, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
DuskyDakota — I like Palin, too. And I see the similarities you describe, but she’s no Reagan. Yet, at least. Reagan was a serious political thinker — which Palin might be — and he had proved it — which she has not — with years of writing and radio commentary. Palin’s not in the great man’s league yet.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
DustyDakota:
You are giving the Republicans a chance this year?? I think the last eight years have been enough of a chance.
This is not a pitbull in lipstick this is George Bush in lipstick.
Are you better off than you were four years ago?
Posted by: woman | September 12, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
DUSTY..
Who do you think got us into this mess? And there is no sexism as far as Palin. People dont’ know her just like Obama. We want the fax man….
Anyone who says it is sexism is crazy. She must prove to us that she can so the job. I haven’t seen that yet.
Posted by: formerhillary | September 12, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Men like beauty queens, women like other women with children.. So regardless of how unprepared Palin appears, regardless of how manipulative, regardless of how misleading, she will get a pass..because men like beauty queens, and women like to see men taken down by a mother. ha ha
Posted by: joe | September 12, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
But voice of reason just saying he wanted to teach sex ed to little kids is misleading very very misleading I wish they would make those adds illegale for both sides sake
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
WOMAN:
I SURE MAY NOT BE BETTER OFF, BUT I
AM SURE AS HELL SAFER THAN BEFORE 9/11..
IF WE DON’T HAVE SOMEONE TO PROTECT US IT WON’T MATTER IF WE ARE BETTER OFF, RICHER, OR HAVE HEALTH INSURANCE. VOTE FOR SOMEONE THAT WILL CONTINUE TO KEEP US SAFE. NO MATTER WHAT YOU THINK OF BUSH HE HAS KEPT US SAFE AND RESTORED THE CIA, FBI AND OTHER OFFICES THAT COMMUNICATIONS WERE NIL. THIS HAD BEEN DESTROYED BY THE FORMER ADMINISTRATION.
Posted by: MEW | September 12, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Everyone would be better of under Obama well 95% of Americans would !
The world would be happier if we choose Obama.
The air would be cleaner and America would be heather if we choose Obama.
Hillary Clintons supporters think Obama is sexist so all Palin has to say to everything is Obama is sexist and the GOP wins.
Clintons supporter think the media was on Obama’s side so all McCain and Palin have to do is say The media is working for Obama.
The GOP wins!
McCain and Palin are not the smarters bunch! Idiots really but when has America voted in the smartest ?
Since colored TV ???
Fact is America is stupid and my party reminds America of that every day!
Obamas the smart choice so McCain wins!
I love our country!
GOP GOP GOP
Posted by: GOP 08 | September 12, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
formerhillary: No–Palin must prove that a hockey mom who is also a governor of a state is more than just a hockey mom. Change her reproductive organs and there would be no story here. Again, tell me how Palin differs from Reagan IN 1980 (not after his presidency). I’m waiting. And by the way, Obama started the sexism by NOT PUTTING THE MOST QUALIFIED CANDIDATE ON HIS TICKET AS VP–who happened to be a woman. Obama: “Ego First.”
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 12, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Gee whiz. Sure, her resume’s a little thinner than some people might like (although I’d like to hear who on the Republican side — the unfortunately-named Jeb Bush aside — was clearly a better choice for the job).
Sarah Palin rose to become governor of her state. Yes, that’s G-O-V-E-R-N-O-R. As in, the highest statewide office, with real and serious responsibilities.
She did this despite being opposed by a corrupt political machine. (C.f., Barack Obama — who rose with the help of a corrupt political machine that helped him, among other things, get his opponents removed from the ballot or to withdraw from the race in his first state senate primary, his national senate primary, and his national senate general election.) She did this without the help of a wealthy or politically-connected husband (C.f., Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, etc.)
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
A guy…arugula is just a fancy word for lettuce. Italians use it a lot. Are you now blaming Obama for being educated?
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Read My LIPSTICK:
No Way, No How, No McCain!
Posted by: Paige | September 12, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Joe — He DID vote to teach sex ed, including — on the face of the bill — teaching about STD prevention, to kindergarteners.
I’m not saying it isn’t spin, but it’s not a lie.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
dl
McCain doesnt pay the woman in his office they are just happy to work with the great man!
Posted by: GOP 08 | September 12, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
The Voice of Reason: I meant Ronald Reagan in 1980. Imagine if he had been Regina Reagan/ Former actress-turned governor from Eureka college who was a sports broadcast journalist? I’m just saying that everyone is holding a higher standard to Palin because she is a woman and mom (to be honest, as a woman, that was my first reaction, too–which suprised me). I am just asking us all to reexamine our biases and give Palin a chance. As a woman and professional, i think that women tend to work harder to prove their competence because we deal with bias every day.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 12, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Haven’t we already given this President enough passes? BTW for those that think we are safer since 9/11, there is more terrorism, less security and less freedom since then. You are not safer, you just like the lies you’ve been told.
Posted by: Danny | September 12, 2008, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
DuskyDakota — Don’t get me wrong; I’m all for giving Sarah Palin a chance!
I just think the comparison to Reagan diminishes Reagan. In 1980 he had been president of his union (the Screen Actor’s Guild), been governor of California for two terms, and had spent years putting his political philosophy on paper and over the airwaves.
I think Sarah Palin is great. I wanted McCain to pick her, and even won a $20 bet when he did! But Reagan? Not yet.
Which is no insult to Palin. There hasn’t been a Reagan on the American political scene since…well…Reagan.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Just keep up with this sexist talk just reminds me why women only get .84$ for every 1$ a man makes it’s because they wine too much. The sad part is it’s not Palin who is doing it it’s the GOP. After they critized Hillary saying she is ” HIDING BEHIND HER APRON STRINGS” and you think Obama is sexist (has two daughters) you should go to the dailyshow and watch tohose clips then you’ll see what sexisum looks like and it’s intials are GOP!
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
“BARACK OBAMA MAKING SURE THAT YOUR MONEY GOES TO HELP SOMEONE ELSE”
You got it, Keith.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
dusty….questions?
Palin differs from Reagan?
Reagan was:
Governor in Califronia 1967-1975, 8years
Totally against racial discrimination
Baptised at 11 as a Christian
Graduated in 1932 with degree in Economnics
Served in the military 1937-1945, retired as a Captain
Signed in 1967 the “Theraputic Abortion Act” to stop backroom abortions
Do you need more?
Posted by: cindyct | September 12, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Obama’s 820 bills he sponsored from the Illinois Senate and 427 bills of which he authored 152 of them in the US Senate is impressive. I’m particularly impressed with the Lugar-Obama Cooperative Threat Reduction and am personally appreciative of the 6 bills he introduced to help the victims of Katrina since many in my family lost everything during that storm.
Posted by: Paige | September 12, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
The Voice of Reason: agreed–I’m just annoyed by the many so-called enlightened thinkers from my own former party of 20 years (the Dems) saying that Palin does not have the right “pedigree.” It smacks of hypocrisy when you look at amazing leaders like Reagan who graduated from Eureka college and the became a movie star. I don’t mean to diminish his accomplishments–just saying that the Palin’s background is not so very different from her male counterparts. Had Reagan run for Pres. after two years of his 1st term as governor, he might have been just as great a leader.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 12, 2008, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Danny
George Bush has saved us!
The terrorists wanted to take away our freedoms and civil liberties…..
So George Bush took them from us.
The terrorists hated the American way of life..
So Bush destroyed it!
The terrorists hated our wealth and global popularity and the fact we dont torture.
So Bush destroyed those things!
Bush has done lots to keep us safe!
GOP GOP GOP
Posted by: GOP 08 | September 12, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Why is reagn so great? What did he do?
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Another supposedly “fair and balanced” journalist in the tank for Obama. Geee, there’s a surprise!
Jake, had you attempted to accurately reflect the range of Governor Palin’s record and experiences, both pro and con, you would have retained your integrity. I believe USA Today has an article out today that is balanced, and
indicates that Governor Palin has governed primarily as a centrist and has primarily been focused on governing rather than being narrowly focused on “culture war issues.” However, you chose to jump on the bandwagon that Governor Palin is some right-wing wacko nut out to govern from a totalitarian perspective. It’s not fair, it’s not balanced, and it’s frankly inhospitable and unAmerican. If Governor Palin is the utter and complete fraud you claim, that will come out on its own, and Senator McCain will be decimated in November.
However, what if Senator McCain’s political nose is accurate, and he has identified a woman with sufficient character and grit to be worthy of the national stage. Wait and see, Jake, wait and see.
By focusing on governance for the good of all, and choosing to affirm rather than legislate her personal values, it seems to me that Governor Palin could be a role model of a way forward for Americans, and be every bit as transformative as a President Obama. So far, I know this. Unlike the two Georges Bush, she can speak in complete sentences. She seems as upbeat and optimistic as Reagan. She seems more disciplined and focused than Bill Clinton. She’s not a bloviator and she’s more on message than Joe Biden. And she seems the pragmatic get-to-work and roll-up-your-sleeves gal compared to Senator Obama’s introspective and professorial persona. We are, after all, choosing a leader and not the next academic in chief. And while I value intellect, that is not the primary qualification for being a leader or for being President (or in Governor Palin’s case, the Vice President).
Do Americans think that Govenor Palin is ready to be President? No, but neither do they think Senator Obama is ready to be President, and that’s the key. Moreover, Governor Palin has a lower standard to hurdle. She’s the understudy; the future leader, whereas Senator Obama needs to demonstrate he’s ready from day one, and he just hasn’t done that, not at all. Did you ever report critically on his background, associations, and accomplishments? NOOOOO, I think not, and the vast majority of Americans agree. If you’d put him through what you’ve put her through, we could talk, but your objectivity gap is showing. And you had 18 months with him, but a startlingly uncurious press barely scrutinized him, as opposed to the abuse you’ve heaped on her in less than 2 weeks. It’s going to take a very long time for journalists and even the media to regain their credibility.
By jumping on the bandwagon with all the haters, you’ve lost your cred.
Posted by: Chad3337 | September 12, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
OPf course he ignores that Roosevelt was previously Sec of the Navy. He also ignores Ted’s military service.
______________________________________
And Sarah Palin has 5 great kids
Go Sarah Palin. Break Barriers.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 12, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
OMG!!! Were is Ronn Paul when you need him?
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
From that sex-ed bill:
“Whenever such courses of instruction are provided in any of grades K-12, then such courses also shall include age-appropriate instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections.”
For whatever it’s worth. The McCain ad is aggressive and negative, sure. Spin (i.e., characterizing his opponent’s record in the least-flattering way possible)? Yep. A lie? Nope. At least not as far as I can tell.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
cindyct: you left out that he graduated from that elite establishment: Eureka College, was a sports caster and Hollywood star. I’m telling you, change his gender with those “hits” on his profile and he would not have been elected president. Anyone note believe that? This country is still sexist and racist and I am glad in any case that one barrier will be broken in this election. By the way, I haven’t seen anything to suggest that Palin is a racist or supports racism. What was that?
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 12, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
And parents could opt out of it too. I think it was a great bill
Posted by: Joe | September 12, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Joe – Why is Reagan so great? This isn’t really the forum.
But to put it in a nutshell, ask anybody in 1980 (other than Reagan) if by 1988 we’d have a roaring economy, soaring national prestige, and have pushed the Soviet Union to the brink of collapse without firing a shot. Such was unthinkable in 1980 after Nixon, Ford, and Carter — and yet it all happened, and Reagan more than anybody else made it happen.
That is the Cliff’s Notes version of why Reagan is so great.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
The media assault on Sarah Palin proves that liberals feel nothing but contempt for the working class and middle class people whom they say they care so much about.
America is full of working class and middle class people who like to hunt and fish, go to church on Sunday, support the military, watch NASCAR races, and encourage their daughters to enter local beauty pagaents and pie baking contests at county fairs.
Then along comes a candidate who fits this mold, and the liberal elites go bonkers. Is it any wonder why the states with the largest percentage of working class and lower middle class people consistently vote Republican?
Republicans respect the values and lifestyles of these people. Liberals view them as trailer trash and then expect them to vote for the Democrats because they promise to put a few extra bucks in their pockets.
Obama’s comments about bitter people from small towns did a good deal of damage. The media’s assault on Sarah Palin did 20 times more damage.
Can’t wait to see all the liberals peeling their 1/20/09 bumperstickers off their cars after McCain/Palin win!
Posted by: The Fop | September 12, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
cindyct: also, look at Palin’s record as Gov. re: the issue of abortion–you will be surprised–abortion became more accessible and less restrictive under her watch. Read the Newsweek article on that.
Posted by: DuskyDakota | September 12, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Todd Palin: Twice the man Obama could ever be!
Posted by: dl | September 12, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
The obama gang are really a Disgrace to their guy – remember UNITY – HOPE CHANGE
The DNC must be so worried about
GOV Palin – that is ALL they want to talk about. Face the FACT -
SHE IS QUALIFIED!!! – and NOTHING you try to do to her will CHANGE this FACT.
The more the DEMS trash her – the better she does!
Posted by: Abby | September 12, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
“Todd Palin: Twice the man Obama could ever be!”
Zero times two is still zero, so you may want to rephrase that to be less insulting towards Todd Palin.
Posted by: Liberals are Dumb | September 12, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
How prepared is Obama on the issue of how many states are in the Union?
How many passes has Obama received from the media?
AND HE IS THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE.
Posted by: bowhuntdude | September 12, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Wasn’t the greatest interview ever. The sad part was Palin was better prepared then Gibson as Gibson just flat out lied about her “exact words”. Very sad, even sadder ABC has not issued a correction, downright criminal is I’ve heard ABC edited out that part for the West Coast broadcast!
As for the sex-ed to kindergartners, saw a clip of Obama talking about it. Saying it had to be scientific. How scientific do you need to be to tell kids not to let strangers touch their wee-wees? Seems that bill was like the expansion of SCHIP which Vilsack admitted was a trojan horse to socialized health care. This bill was meant to get sex ed into schools easier, you just call it “teaching kids to avoid sexual abuse”.
Posted by: Zaggs | September 12, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Palin obviously has the core foreign policy values, instincts, intelligence and leadership skills that we need to lead this country.
Posted by: Kevin | September 12, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Let me put forward this blanket proposition: Anyone who has served as the chief executive of his state is presumptively adequately-qualified to run for vice-president.
I think that’s a pretty fair statement that should be unobjectionable. Sure, that includes Jesse Ventura, but I said “presumptively” qualified — not “indisputably” qualified. If you’ve been governor but done a terrible job, that’s one thing. But if you’ve been even moderately-competent at running even a small state, that should be enough to dispel questions about your ability.
Lots of people thought Obama should choose Gov. Sebelius from Kansas, and that McCain should choose Gov. Pawlenty from Minnesota. What foreign-policy expertise would either of those people brought to the ticket? Most certainly very little. The question of her qualifications is a silly canard.
Ideology is something else. If you think her policies are bad for America, say so. But stop belittling the lady’s qualifications. She’s not only been governor of her state — by all indicators, she’s been a GREAT governor. The idea that she’ll be overmatched by the VP job just doesn’t pass the laugh test.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Palin – America’s woman. She’s been there done that and most American woman recognize that fact.
Still, there are some ugly women and women who can’t make it so they align themselves to the party of victims — standing proudly next to PITA, the greenies and those who claim their grandfathers voted for FDR.
Posted by: dl | September 12, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
“The sad part was Palin was better prepared then Gibson as Gibson just flat out lied about her “exact words”
No he did not. Though Redstate is huffing and puffing about it.
Palin had no idea what Gibson was talking about when he said the Bush doctrine and she repeated scripted answers.
Prepared must be a relative term.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 12, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
Charlie Gibson is a disgrace to broadcasting/journalism.
The No Quarter website did a comparison of 2 interviews:
1. Gibson/Obama – hugging/smiling/warm reception/sickening display of Gibson kissing up to Obama.
vs.
2. Gibson/Palin – hateful/demeaning/hubris comment/distorting/twisting/facial expression of hatrid.
America we are fried if this continues. The corporate bias wanting to get Obama elected is scary. This is 3rd World where the people only get a one sided view. I say NO to ABC, CBS, and NBC
I will be voting in November on more than one level.
Against Barack Obama (no experience/criminal connections)
Against MSM (horrible bias/insulting the voters of America)
Against The Democratic Party (for rigging the primaries)
Sooo, with all of that being said – there are a few lessons that must be taught here. Do not lose sight of how hugh this election is, if we the American people want to claim freedom of choosing the candidate to be President of the USA.
McCain/Palin 08
Posted by: disgusted in Illinois | September 12, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Danny, Danny:
“Haven’t we already given this President enough passes? BTW for those that think we are safer since 9/11, there is more terrorism, less security and less freedom since then. You are not safer, you just like the lies you’ve been told.”
Where in America is there more terrorism, less security, and less freedom? Tell us.
Depends on what you call lies, or what “is- is”.
We were not safe before 9/11, we just thought we were. We will never know SAFE anymore, but we have to give credit where credit is due. No one is fighting in our backyard now, but if we let our guard down..who knows. Maybe none of the candidates can continue to do this, but for the safety of all Americans, don’t you think we should vote for the one that has experience to continue with the policies that are in place to keep us as safe as possible in these times, and who knows that person just might have some better ideas.
America is worth fighting for..this is serious.
Posted by: MEW | September 12, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
“No he did not. Though Redstate is huffing and puffing about it. ”
Yes, he did. Pulling a quote mid-setence isn’t exactly when the full sentence obviously reveals a different meaning isn’t exactly “exact.”
Posted by: ggg | September 12, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
“So I think (Obama) definitely has convinced people that he stands for change and for hope, and I can’t wait to see what he stands for.”
– Susan Sarandon
BARACK OBAMA. THE CANDIDATE FOR CHANGE AND HOPE. AND WE HOPE TO LEARN MORE ABOUT IT.
Posted by: A Guy Named Keith | September 12, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Yeah, Gibson did twist her words. What he repeated meant almost the opposite of what she actually said.
As for the Bush Doctrine…quick! No cheating! What’s the Bush Doctrine!
Is it the notion that we have the right to preemptively go to war against a perceived, but not yet materialized, threat to our security? Yep.
Is it the notion that a country that tolerates terrorists operating within its borders will be held responsible for attacks those terrorists make? Again, yep.
Is it the policy that in the war on terror if you’re not with us you’re against us? Once more, yes.
Is it the policy that we have the right to take unilateral action against threats to our security even when multilateral institutions like the U.N. refuse to authorize it? You guessed it! Yes.
There is no single Bush Doctrine. Yes, I wish she had seemed more familiar with the term, but the term has no distinct meaning. Gibson had one particular policy in mind when he used the term, but since he felt like he was the professor and she was the student taking the quiz, he didn’t explain.
Perhaps what she should have said was, “In what respect, Charlie?”
Oh…wait. That IS what she said.
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Heh.
First, Obama and the media ran against President Bush. (Note: He’s not running for office.)
Now they’re running against a Vice-Presidential candidate. In the process, they’re (purposely??) alienating every demographic you can think of.
Ayup. Sounds like a strategy to me. Not a good strategy, mind, but a strategy, none-the-less.
How’re those ol’ stock options lookin’, Jake?
Posted by: Warren Bonesteel | September 12, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
She’s an idiot and anyone attempting to defend her attempt to be knowledgeable is an even bigger idiot!
Obama/Biden 08-16
Posted by: Past | September 12, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
I am a long time Democrat, have met Hillary Clinton and have a significant job in public education. Sarah Palin is an intelligent, powerful and capable woman who also lives her convictions and is the kind of real person Americans can identify with. She, unlike Obama, has actual executive experience. She will get all the help she needs to get up to speed on important issues – the same thing happens to every VP. For examples of other women who rose to the occasion, think of Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher. She and McCain will win it.
Posted by: Alison | September 12, 2008, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
disgusted in Illinois – Do I really come across as being in the tank for Obama? That’s funny.
And I’ve never done an AOL poll. Must be some other Voice of Reason. But every site needs one!
Posted by: The Voice of Reason | September 12, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
The editing after this interview was a real hatchet job. Anyone who reads the transcript will see that Palin knows what she’s doing.
As for the “Bush Doctrine” question–does anyone really know what that is? There’s no such document as a “Bush Doctrine”–it was something cobbled together by journalists from various Bush statements, and every journalist has a different idea of what’s included–no wonder Palin asked “In what respect?”
All these questions about “Would you go to war if Enemy X attacked Ally Y?”: If she says yes, she’s a war-monger–if she says no, she’s a weakling. She also knows that our enemies are watching this interview!!! So she says what any reasonable President would say–we’ll try diplomacy and economic sanctions, but keep military action as a last resort.
Consider the alternative: Obama declares unconditional surrender in Iraq, concessions to Iran, and invades Pakistan, then Biden chops Iraq up into three small undefendable countries squabbling with each other. What a disaster! Palin is MUCH more qualified to President than Obama, and she wouldn’t have to be unless McCain dies in office.
Posted by: Steve Z | September 12, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
I am shocked with the reviews of Palin’s interview yesterday. Had it been Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden or any of the people on McCain’s short list (Romney, Lieberman or Pawlenty) we would not be hearing things like, “it wasn’t a disaster but it wasn’t a home run either” or “she passed”.
We would be saying they are wholly unqualified to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency. This is not a high school exam, this is possibly running the most powerful country on earth!
Posted by: cincyr | September 12, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Something similar happened in Germany with Angela Merkel. She was looked down on by her colleagues, a protestant northern woman coming from the ex RDA in a party traditionally leaded by catholic southerner men. In her first debates she was nervous and made mistakes. She was less popular and charismatic than Schroeder and won the elections by a narrow margin. She has done things well, german economy is recovering after years of depression and now the conservatives are 20 points up over the socialdemocrats in the polls.
Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 12, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
The Gibson interview mostly highlighted the complete double standard at which Obama is given puff ball interviews while Sarah was interrogated as if she was a criminal. Yet she still did better than um, er, ah, Obama. The people have learned that they cannot trust the MSM for fair or even truthful coverage of politics since they are nothing more than talking heads for the DNC.
Posted by: Tobias2012 | September 12, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
“I’m sorry but I am not in the business of putting my life in the hands of a tasmanian devil!”
Why? Are you afraid of cartoon characters? On the other hand, Mrs. Taz was pretty scary in lipstick and even Bugs admitted that after putting them on the plane.
Posted by: len | September 12, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
I go back to the point. Were Carter or Clinton learned in foreign policy when they run for president? I don´t think so.
When Mr. America community organizer explains us his policy towards Venezuela, Russia, Iran and North Korea and gives a masterly lesson, then I´ll admit and say ´People, you´re right, this man is the best qualified´. Meanwhile I have many doubts on him.
Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 12, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Let’s please get off the executive experience mantra; George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and more all had it but that so called quality did not lead to postive results for the country.
Experience too, while it can be a good thing if it is combined with sound judgement. Neither Repbulican candidate has sound judgement and they will take us deeper in debt and further offend our friendly nations; which will mean we’ll continue to bear the brunt of the burdens of the rest of the world.
Let’s take a serious look at plans and policies and get off all these meaningless one-liners and talking points. Time for some serious and significant discussion of the issues we face!
Posted by: Bill, Dayton, OH | September 12, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
“George W. Bush, George H.W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, and more all had it but that so called quality did not lead to postive results for the country.”
right buddy.
Here’s for 4 more years of Jimmy Carter!!!!!
Posted by: notafool | September 12, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Jimmy Carter, one of America´s worst presidents in the XXth century. My parents voted him and regretted their whole life.
Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 12, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Good grief. The guy gives you a perfectly objective, honest no-spin statement and what do you do? Snark.
What’s up with you?
Posted by: Paul A'Barge | September 12, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I have been a fan of ABC News for many years, mainly because I felt they did the best job at staying “neutral” but after watching the last several weeks I am terribly disappointed. I am on the fence and was hoping to see the candidates and listen to their responses to the tough questions without the interviewer throwing his or her tone of acceptance or displeasure in my face. I am so turned off by Brian Ross, Diane Sawyer, and, sadly, Charlie Gibson, who I thought had grace and poise.
Posted by: Disappointed | September 12, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Sarah will, in short time, learn to
shovel manure to the people with the
ease that Ohbama does. Until then, I
for one, am enjoying this refreshing
political figure….and so, apparently,
is most of the rest of this country.
Posted by: grizzly bare | September 12, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
The interview was so injected with edits, that you can spot them, as you’re watching.
He twisted, and mangled things, and went into this interview with that in mind. To appear as lording over her, intimidate, and assault with words. If anything was scripted, it was Charlie boys performance.
I thought, of all the msm’s, we had at least one left, we could trust, and look to….but nope. Charlie just proved he runs with the herds.
The democrats, rantings of lies, and conspiracies on 9/11 is a ruse. This is their smoke and mirrors act, to distract. They want us to wrap our brains around that, while in reality, they plan on a socialist society, perhaps even as far out there, as communist. Obama’s thug tactics used, when someone prints, or exposes something he doesn’t want out there.
William Ayres visits to, and glorification of Venezuela’s Chaves ideologies. The white hate. I don’t think all these white dudes that help get Obama elected will be exactly welcome after, if he were elected.
Obama giving millions in earmarks as donations to private organizations.
He’s bogus. He’s America’s equivalant to Russia’s Rasputin. He’s totally not who he portrays himself to be.
The difference here is…he lies, and everyone supports, and defends him no matter what.
Mrs. Palin and McCain, are treated as if they’re the plague in human form.
It’s disgusting.
THINK people. The democrats claim all this love, and peace, and harmony, but look down their noses at these people. Do you really think they love, or care about you? They look down their noses at you, when you aren’t looking.
If their ideas, and promises meant anything, wouldn’t we all be out of poverty by now? How many more years do we pay for these social progams that DO NOT WORK, but only maintain the status quo, and keep you where you’re at. Each year, more money is doled out for them, and each year, more people fall into them. This needs to stop NOW!
Smaller governement, give us our money back, and let us create the jobs, and the work. It can be done, but not under a socialist regime, and I guarantee you, if Obama is elected, we are headed into the world that Venezuela is in now. Ask those people who have been so restricted, and still in abject poverty, how well that’s working out for them.
Posted by: Jeanie | September 12, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“The country likes her so she will get a pass or two. If she holds up beyond that, she could be a transformative [person] in American history. If not, we will all be disappointed.”
************
Can’t the same be said of Obama?
Posted by: Echo21 | September 12, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Gov. Palin will be a sponge at President McCain’s side…when has a VP really done anything in recent history? She will be a quick study and represent the Average American better than any elected VP before her.
McCain aced his first important executive decision….Obama didn’t. His CHANGE mantra went down the toilet with Biden…politics as usual. Shoring up a Presidential candidate’s weaknesses is not what I will vote for. Presidential material at the top of the ticket….McCain all the way! Palin is just icing for me.
Posted by: Debra | September 12, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Look, I AM a registered democrat, and I NOT working on the Obama campaign. I do not work for the party. I am just a guy who agrees with their platform.
I am not an Obama maniac as the MS likes to call democrats, but I do think the primaries selected the correct candidate.
I am sick and tired of people saying the democratic primary was rigged. Sorry, but it wasn’t. I understand why you are upset that your candidate did not win. The candidate that I wanted to win didn’t either.
The primaries were run properly, and the candidate that ran a better campaign won. I respect Senator Clinton, but Senator Obama ran a better campaign and won more delegates. Plain and simple – end of story. From a policy and position standpoint, they are the same candidate. There are differences, but they are both trying to accomplish the same things for this country. Things that I agree with:
Publically funded health insurance for lower income families.
Allowing woman to make the choice on when they are ready to have children.
True economic growth occurs by growing the middle incomes, not by increasing the wealth of those in the upper income range.
Ending the military presence in Iraq, especially since “Mission Accomplished” has already been declared twice.
I am veteran of the US Army infantry, and they both have records of really supporting veterans. Republicans like to say that they support the troops, and then vote AGAINST veterans benefits (like Senator McCain). I got out of service at the end of the first Gulf War, and enlisted under the Army College Fund program. I received over $25K in tax free money to go to college on. I now pay this back every year in taxes, and I am happy to do. Yet Senator McCain and the Republican Party now oppose this program…
But, HELLO, I remember the 90’s! If Senator Clinton was the candidate, Fox News would be having a field day. For right or wrong, the Republican Party HATES the Clintons. They have over a decade of ammunition put in storage that they could, and WOULD, have used against her. Those are the WMDs that Bush was looking for in Iraq. The smear campaign that you are seeing now is a direct result of the Republican Party (ok – Karl Rove) scrambling to see what fecal matter that they had stored up against Senator Clinton will stick against Senator Obama. Now just imagine if Senator Clinton as the VP pick. Sorry, but I think Senator Obama would actually be behind in the polls right now if that had happened. The Fox News and Rush Limbaugh’s of the world would have seen to hit. Let’s be honest, Rush’s popularity happened as a direct results of slamming the Clintons.
If William Ayers is really the terrorist that some people are making him out to be, why hasn’t the FBI picked him up? We have the Patriot Act. This is supposed to protect us from all terrorists, both foreign and domestic! The government has the ability have him wiretapped WITHOUT a warrant. Yet he is still walking around free. So, this means that he is either: 1) not guilty of anything, or 2) actually Osama Bin Ladin.
Posted by: jackster | September 12, 2008, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
There is something fundamentally rotten at the core of the republican party when they can celebrate the elevation of a candidate to run for our highest office that is so unqualified as to be laughable. Over and over again they say the opposite of what they truly believe – in this case, “country first.” They will pull whatever stunt necessary to win an election, and with Sarah Palin they and John McCain have hit a new low. It is despicable and disheartening to think our great democracy has fallen so low. If republican’s had any shame, they would hang their head and weep.
Posted by: angry lefty | September 13, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
For a couple of weeks, Republican
image makers tried to present her
to the electorate as something of
a phenom in a hundred years. They
kept her in seclusion allowing her
to attend only carefully selected
events.
What people saw early on was an
image. An illusion.
The real Sarah Palin if she wants
to be POTUS must first acquire the range and depth of knowledge and
the gravitas the job demands.
Posted by: anon | September 13, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
I think transformative disappointment just about sums it up. At least it’s something to hope for as long as it isn’t another four year lesson.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 14, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am
there some rly great stuff on here. I personally prefer bestfreepc.com tho, the offers are way better
Posted by: Carey Reinsch | December 9, 2011, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm