Sep 9, 2008 3:12pm

White Women and Movability

A good follow-up question to our latest poll's finding on white women is whether they’ve been more changeable overall in their vote preferences in this year of the historic Clinton and Palin candidacies. The answer: Yep.

Check out the two tables below. There’ve been any number of swings among white women between majority preference for Barack Obama or John McCain – in the spring as Obama and Hillary Clinton duked it out, in the early- and mid-summer as Clinton’s intentions remained the subject of speculation, and now as Sarah Palin has joined the GOP ticket. For around one in 10 white women, it’s been a complicated race in which to choose.

There’s been far less movement among white men – they’ve consistently favored McCain by significant margins. The standard deviation (dispersion from the average) among white women has been nearly twice what it’s been among white men. It makes white women especially worth watching; since they've been moving, they could keep moving.

Interestingly, white women also have been a changeable group in past elections. In 2004, per the exit poll, they voted 55-44 percent for George W. Bush over John Kerry; in 2000, though, they divided evenly, 49-48 percent, between Bush and Al Gore. White men, by contrast, went for Bush by about 25-point margins in both those elections.

Among white women     Obama McCain   O-M Diff9/7    41%   53      -128/22   50    42       +87/13   47    46       +16/15   40    53      -135/11   43    51       -84/13   46    47       -13/2    51    41      +102/1    43    52       -9STDEV 4.1   4.9      8.9
Among white men     Obama McCain   O-M Diff9/7    34%   58      -248/22   35    57      -227/13   35    56      -216/15   40    55      -155/11   41    54      -134/13   39    53      -143/2    41    52      -112/1    38    58      -20STDEV 2.9   2.3      4.8

Among the differences between these groups, white women are more apt than white men to be Democrats (by an 11-point margin), more apt to be retirement-aged, less apt to be under 40 and less well-off financially (more apt to have incomes under $50K, less apt to have incomes over $100K). There are no significant differences on ideology, attention to the race, intention to vote, education or religion.

Comparing our last poll to our new one, we find movement toward McCain among white women pretty much across the board (excluding Democrats and liberals), but it’s been most pronounced among white women who are lower-income, under 50, opponents of legal abortion and non-evangelicals – the latter probably because evangelicals were a broadly pro-McCain group already.

User Comments

What I find interesting is that the media is all over Palin regarding her Christian faith , which amounts to religious bigotry in my opinion. (Apparently, this is the only association the media and the Dems can come up with that they are trying to use to unjustly smear Palin with). While ignoring Obama’s very dubious connections to, Wright, Ayers, Rezko, Pfleger, Khalidi and others, including Dr. al-Mansour,. Dr. Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour (born Donald Warden) whose 1995 book claimed that the U.S. government was planning the genocide of black Americans. Dr. al-Mansour also has been a harsh critic of Israel and has served as a major advisor to Saudi Royal family members seeking to improve and extend their influence in the United States. And according to the Social Activism Project at the University of California at Berkeley, when he was still Donald Warden, the fellow was a mentor to Black Panthers Huey Newton and Bobby Seale. Investor’s Business Daily last Friday wrote a fascinating editorial about Dr. al-Mansour’s assistance to Barack Obama. It is a short piece but the news it contains is explosive and certainly deserves careful attention. But, of course, the old guard media is interested only in associations that might hurt Republicans.

Posted by: Mary | September 9, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

“across the board – excluding Democrats and liberals”? How is that ‘across the board’? So if Republican women presumably favor McCain already, the movement is among Independents with particular emphasis on working class (Catholic?) women (with kids?) Can you be more specific?

Posted by: bct424 | September 9, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

Well, there’s no “old guard” left-wing media anymore, if there ever was. A good book to read would be “What Liberal Media – The Truth About Bias and the News” by Eric Alterman. As a Christian, my observation isn’t that the press is “all over” Palin for her Christian faith. Instead, now that their invasive intrusion into her family seems to be over) they’re looking at 1) a long string of allegations of ethical violations and just plain outright lies on her part and 2) possible extremist religious views which put her way out of the mainstream of American culture.

Posted by: Wiscon108 | September 9, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Maybe they are “movable” because there is no such ideological group like “White Women” so each time you sample different women, you get different answers. This might be a false demographic for the questions you are asking.

Posted by: RT | September 9, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

If white women are moving from Obama to Palin simply because she is a woman, then they are doing a great disservice to their families and community.
It is mind-boggling that they would dismiss the issues at this time when we are at war and our economy is so f’d up. If it were up to McCain, we’ll be in Iraq indefinitely…that means more of our soldiers are placed in harms way meaninglessly to protect a country that has a stronger economy than we do. FOR MOTHERS…doesn’t that mean anything to you. McCain also made a comment that he hasn’t retracted that bringing back the draft would be a good idea…MOTHERS, doesn’t that mean anything to you? McCain and Palin talked only about themselves in their convention and never mentioned what they would do for us…PEOPLE doesn’t that mean anything to you?
These people don’t have a plan to get us back on the right track so they are parading Palin, a woman, to entice us women to vote for McCain. They don’t have a plan to help pull us out of a bad economy, so they say that the election will be about personality.
Eight years ago, we all said “Now Bush…there’s a guy I can have a beer with.” Eight years later, we can’t even afford the damn beer.
That’s what the republicans are so good at…distracting you from what really matters…the issues. AND WOMEN if you are stupid enough to fall for it this time around, then you can’t complain when your sons and daughters come home in more bodybags or you can’t afford to put your children through college or let alone send them to good schools, or you can’t complain when you realize you’re about to lose your home to foreclosure…because you reduced yourselves to what the Republicans expected you to be…empty women who vote with their bras instead of their brains.
And as for sexism…I’ve never heard that term spit out so losely. It’s not sexism when we question Palin’s history or her ability to lead should anything happen to McCain…it’s responsible. I’ve got the responsibility to put my children’s future in the right candidate’s hands, so, you’re damn right I’m going to ask questions. As mothers…that’s our damn job! And if we question whether Palin can handle it with 5 kids…we asked the same of John Edwards when Elizabeth announced her cancer had returned…so all you Republicans…SHUT UP!

Posted by: sandra | September 9, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

For the white male, it’s about race. If a black man who made Law Review at Harvard can’t be accepted because he’s only half-white, that says a lot.
For the women, it’s about having a woman in the White House. Forget Roe vs. Wade and everything else the pro-choice groups calimed were so important to them.
This is all about RACE! This is White America!

Posted by: DQ | September 9, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

I’m under 50, white, have a Bachelor’s degree, earn more than $50,000 a year, am a life-long Democrat, and don’t care about the abortion question, one way or another. I’m supporting McCain-Palin because I think John McCain will make a good president. The more the Obama campaign and their idiot supporters attack Sarah Palin, the better I like her.

Posted by: Another Sarah | September 9, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Hey Republicans…I have to comment on your assestment that the media has been sexism against Sarah Palin because they are asking if she can handle the job as VP and still be able to care for her family.
First of all…you MUST recognize that the men candidates have also been asked this of them. The one example that races to my mind is when Elizabeth Edwards revealed her cancer had come back and everyone was asking could John Edwards handle looking after his family at the same time he was running for president.
So please, please refrain from a close-minded approach that anytime we question Sarah Palin it’s because we’re sexist. I’m a woman and I am asking this same question because she has 5 teenage children and they are at an age where they are very impressionable…that’s fair. Just like it was fair to question Edwards if he could handle running for Pres. while his wife was in her vulnerable state.
What scares me is that women might be focusing on trying to prove a point at the expense of putting our country back on the right track. The republicans are dangerous…and as a mother to be (my baby arrives in Dec.) I’m more concerned on making the point that I cannot entrust my baby’s future to a party that wrecklessly thrusted us into a war that never should have been waged. I’m more concerned that the republican party for the next 8 years will countinue to harms us economically and do nothing to advance our educational system. That’s what we should be focusing on.
If your focus is sexism and accusing anyone of that when we question whether or not our candidates are capable of handling the job, than you’re doing a bigger disservice to your families and communities and you need to recognize that. I’ve got the right to ask ALL the questions of our politicians because I’ve got the responsiblity to my family to vote for the person that I believe will best benefit us as a country. And if the media can help me get those answers, then your dam right I’m going to listen and take advantage of that tool…not to say I won’t look for other tools to help me gather info. on our candidates.
And for all you women who vote for McCain just because he’s got a woman on the ticket…ask yourself this question:
will you feel good about yourselves voting for a man who would keep us in Iraq indefinitely…if so then don’t complain when your sons and daughters come home in a body bag. Will you feel good about yourselves for voting for a ticket that refuses to believe we have an economic disaster…than don’t complain when you lose your home, or your jobs and can’t pay the bills or send your kids to college.
The republicans don’t have a plan! That is why for them, this election will be about personality than issues. That’s what they are good at, distracting us from what really matters. Remember this 8 years ago: “Now Bush…there’s a guy I can have a beer with.” Well eight years later, we can’t even afford the dam beer.
Women don’t reduce yourselves to what the Republicans are wanting you to be…empty women who vote with their bras instead of their brains.”
WE’RE BETTER THAN THAT!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Sandra | September 9, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

The best choice is Hillary. It’s about issues and, yes, I truly believe a woman will bring necessary leadership for this country right now. Too bad Palin is way off to the right – otherwise she’s a great woman.

Posted by: sue truckowski | September 9, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

The best choice is Hillary. It’s about issues and, yes, I truly believe a woman will bring necessary leadership for this country right now. Too bad Palin is way off to the right – otherwise she’s a great woman.

Posted by: sue truckowski | September 9, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Since Palin doesn’t believe in the separation of church and state, her religious views are VERY important in this race. She will use those views to further establish policy slanted toward evangelism.

Posted by: JR | September 9, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

How many here have ranted against Bush and his policies the last few years but are going to now vote for McCain/Palin even though they represent a continuation of those very same Bush policies? And you say “race” isn’t an issue? Bull-spit.

Posted by: JR | September 9, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

It’s all moot because, as the WSJ is reporting, BHO has sent 30 (yes, 30!) lawyers to Alaska to dig up dirt on Palin. When these scumbags find anything negative, the Obama surrogates in the mainstream media are going to have a feeding frenzy on it and the election will be won by BHO in a manner reminiscent of his first Illinois legislature campaign: by dirty backdoor tactics.That guy is as dirty a politician as any I’ve ever seen and I’ve been involved in general elections since 1959 (and never previously for the Republicans).
Go McCain

Posted by: Marty | September 9, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

I guess women like throwing their equal rights away by voting for Bush 3 and Bush 4. Odd!

Posted by: kgj | September 9, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

JR — a lot of Dems have shifted to Repubs in the past. That’s how Reagan won. Bill Clinton brought them back. Also, people have complex opinions. Blacks as a group are fairly religious and conservative, but they back the Dems. There are a lot of “flexible” voters among whites, who do not adhere to Democratic or Republican orthodoxy. There are a lot of “national security” women who value lower taxes and the Republican stance on terror. They may want public health care and might actually be pro-choice, but they prioritize. You guys act like people are “black and white” politically, when they are not.

Posted by: Angry Black Democrat | September 9, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Me too. Independent voters for McCain Palin!
They represent the American majority. Race
has nothing to do with it, we supported Condi

Posted by: foxynewslady | September 9, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Kgj – stop it with the scare tactics. What “rights” did women as a class lose as a result of Bush? The only one I can think of is “partial birth abortion — unless necessary to protect the woman’s life.” It usually is necessary to protect the woman’s life. Also, there were alternatives to the procedure left in the statute.

Posted by: Angry Black Democrat | September 9, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Don’t worry Marty. McCain is dispatching a “truth squad” to respond to the “dirt.” Unlike the Democratic primaries, the Republican media (Fox, Wash Times, National Review, WSJ, etc) and blog world will tear down efforts to demonize Palin. The liberal media helped him beat down Clinton. This is a new ballgame.

Posted by: Angry Black Democrat | September 9, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Manfred – EnOUGh BUSHes , along with McBush and Pit Bull

Posted by: Linda,Fl | September 9, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Another Sarah, I agree totally that Obama has used race to his advantage in this campaign. On several occasions he told audiences that the Republicans and John McCain would say, “he doesn’t look like the other guy, his name is funny, did I mention he’s black, etc.” The problem is, I never heard John McCain, anyone on his staff, or any official in the Republican Party refer to Barack Obama’s race, the rumors about his alleged Muslim religion, his ‘funny’ name, or anything of the sort. Barak Obama was the one bringing up these issues, not John McCain. That is one thing that turned me off in his campaign, and I was, in the beginning, open to Senator Obama. For a time I truly did believe he was a new kind of politician. Then he proved he wasn’t, and he lost my support. I really think a lot of Obama supporters have invested so much energy and time into their adulation of this man that they simply cannot bring themselves to admit that they were wrong. Instead, they cling to their position, and spew vitriol at those who don’t agree with them. That’s just childish, in my opinion. I supported Obama in the beginning because I didn’t want a rerun of the Bill & Hillary Show, but now I’m casting a vote for John McCain. He’s a decent guy, and he doesn’t deserve to have his reputation and his war record trashed by the left-wing of the party. My father is a veteran, and so are two of my uncles. I don’t have much patience for people who attack men who have served their country.

Posted by: Veteran's Kid | September 9, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

NO OBAMA! NO OBAMA. he is not fit.

Posted by: foxynewslady | September 9, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

The very women who fought so hard regarding roe v. wade are the very women BO decided didn’t have anywhere else to go but to him. He was soooooooooo wrong.

Posted by: Kitty | September 9, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

Wow someone using scare tactics. Sound familiar?

Posted by: kgj | September 9, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

As a white female I am concerned that woman can dismiss the issues at hand and not see where the country is today before getting excited about a woman that has so little experience. I am independent but lean on the Democrate side most of the time. This woman’s beliefs are very scary for mainstream women. Her views on absence only and not teaching sex education shows a lack of understanding of what is happening with the kids, I am a retired health teacher with 25 years experence, and know that absence only does not work. For this reason alone I would not vote for McCain and the idea that Palin would be next in line is unthinkable. I hope the media will keep telling the truth on all four and people will listen instead of just voting without thinking. We don’t know much about Palin and have little time left to find out. I resent the way McCain decieded on this woman and expects us to vote for him because of her. Come on women wake up and think don’t fall for an old man pushing an unknown on us just because it is a woman. I though we were smarter than this.

Posted by: rbrgood | September 9, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

Prince Abdullah told Dr. Khalid al-mansour
Arabia wanted more influence in America?
Khalid al-Mansour, one time known as
Donald Warden has Berkeley California, black
panther associations. That was bad news for
Obama’s camp.. More questionable associations
emerge daily. Community organizer of church
groups? His soft pedalling his work with his
Pastor, Jeremiah Wright? No thanks. No obama
he has no experience as a leader and he was
groomed for this candidacy by who? hmmm
American women vote for your America, the
Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.
Women are treated better in America than any
arab country. Obama’s history is unacceptable.

Posted by: foxynewslady | September 9, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

The world is in recession. At least in America
we have an abundance of food, sources to help
people in need, women have rights, are not
forced to walk behind males, wear costumes
treated as second rate citizens. Does
the House of Saud protect women’s rights?
Huh? Why not, they want influence in America
and did they fund all of Obama’s education, his
4 million dollar home? He didn’t buy it with
books. wake up sleeping dogs. It is time to
confront the liars or demagogues and elect
the All American Team, McCain and Palin.
We are independents for the Republicans and
we are forming another group, the Women for
the McCain/Palin ticket. Join in and learn the
truth about Obama and his history. It is no
longer secrets, the truth is emerging daily. The
archives of the UIC Library have been opened.
the graduate, Obama, Magna cum saudi is exposed.

Posted by: foxynewslady | September 9, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

McCain’s history is unacceptable. As in his history with George W. Bush.

Posted by: kgj | September 9, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

My whole family, democrats from birth, will vote McCain/Palin. Not just because of a great woman was just added to the McCain ticket, but because 1) OBAMA IS NOT QUALIFIED. 2) Obama runs with corrupt characters. 3) Obama has no friends to speak of his character as job reference.
Obama’s friends hate America and most are in jail. That makes Obama an enemy of the state.
Now that Governor Palin has been added to the ticket as VP, Obama the community organizer, looks less qualified to be president.
There’s no doubt that John McCain has experience to the President.

Posted by: Mrs. Phoenix | September 9, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I don’t believe in poll either. It is not real. Let’s wait till November 4. It is the day when the American will choose their president. It is the day when we will say:
No McCain/Palin
No Bush failed policies
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

Posted by: I.A.T smith | September 9, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I am a middle-age, middle-class white women and I was both a Hillary and Obama supporter. My support shifted to Obama the moment Hillary backed out of the race and he and Joe Biden will continue to have my support. Just because Sarah Palin is a woman has nothing to do with where I stand on the issues. Personally, I think tapping Palin for VP is a joke. The fact that Bush began talking about removing troops from Iraq after Obama made removal of troops from Iraq an issue, and the fact that McCain is now talking about “change” when this is what Obama has based his entire campaign on is amazing to say the least. Although I have a lot of respect for what McCain went through in the war, the rhetoric from both Bush and McCain, seems to confirm that you cannot trust what now are the McCain/Palin messages. In any case, I trust in the Change that Obama talks about and believe that cares about all Americans. I was against the war from the beginning; am part of the middle class affected by a corporation that cut health and retirement benefits to my husband who has worked for the same company for 25 years. I am pro-choice, believe in equality for everyone and am a huge supporter of the health and education changes as outlined by Obama. I hope people who are independent or don’t know who they are going to vote for can manage to look at the issues and not the hype of personalities that is presented to us. Obama is smart, dedicated and articulate and would not only do great things for us in the U.S., but would be a great at diplomacy and foreign relations.

Posted by: Rose | September 9, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

I consider this a referendum on the way the democrats treated Hillary.
It just so happens though that I’m completely excited about McCain/Palin though.
So now I have a number of great reasons for my choice.
McCain/Palin 08

Posted by: Nobama9989989 | September 9, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

IF you are a child left behind, blame your
parents, before most of begin school, we are
already educated in some areas. We develop
learning skills at the knee of our father and
mother, how to communicate with people is
first. Our parents communicate with us, we
are taught to read and write with books and
interaction with our families. Please don’t
put me in the charge of a public school. We
learned more about American History before
we entered school to have them undo our learning
not only from the Historians, but the fact we
were taken to Americas historical sights, to
Washington, we saw the Capitol Building, the
10 commandments, engraved on the walls, the
history of the Congress having church meetings
in the legislative buildings.

Posted by: foxynewslady | September 9, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

I’m a white woman, new lawyer, my starting salary is just under $200,000. I was voting Hillary, but now I’m all about McCain/Palin.
I don’t embrace either party on the issues. I admire McCain/Palin’s record of reform and service and their ideas. I’m also excited to finally get the first woman vp and potential pres.
I’m a feminist, and I don’t care about abortion at all. I’m tired of pro-choice feminists saying Palin is anti-woman because she’s pro-life. Since when is being pro-choice a litmus test for feminism? I’m much more concerned about other issues, and can see how being pro-life doesn’t mean you’re an anti-feminst.
Democratic men use abortion scare tactics to try to keep womens’ votes without ever having to do anything for us. It’s not going to work this time!!!!
McCain/Palin 08!!!!!!!!

Posted by: I <3 McCain/Palin | September 9, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Rose, This is a free country and so far not socialist so you are allowed to vote for whoever you want as president and be respected for that decision. However, there are some inconsistencies in your post. Bush is not talking about pulling troops because Obama suggested it. Bush is pulling troops (to send to Afganistan) because the surge in Iraq, of which McCain supported and Obama did not, is working. They are handing over more and more provinces to Iraqi soldiers who were trained by our military.
Secondly, as stated by Biden, the presidency does not lend itself to on the job training, Obama has no foreign policy experience, and limited experience in everything else.

Posted by: S Adams | September 9, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Every woman I know is voting for Obama. Truth is hard to spin.

Posted by: Carolina | September 9, 2008, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

Okay, everyone wants to base this one race, but deny it at the same time. Ask McCain’s senior adviser, Nancy Pf., what she meant when she said on CNN Sunday that Obama is just carrying the water for his party.

Posted by: Vee | September 9, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

What scares me about Palin is her reigniting the culture wars just when America was starting to at least appear to move beyond that ugly era. There is no place in Washington for someone who is so overtly religious about her politics, particularly when she has such extremist positions. If a politician actually believes that a war is God’s will…specifically she said that the war effort in Iraq is “from God”…he/she should not say that out loud. It sounds, for lack of a better way of putting it, what someone in the middle east would say about the war against America. While my personal faith is deep, I DO NOT believe God involves him/herself in wars nor favors one group over another. We are fighting that type of extremism, not trying to emulate it!!!!

Posted by: Jessica Ferry | September 9, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

The rebulican party seems to be getting the gains they have by promising no new taxes or not raising taxes,well it is pretty dumb to think that with the economy being in the shape it is in that we can get by without raising them.we cannot keep boring from other countries to keep our heads barely above water,to keep us in Iraq with 140,000 troops still there doesn’t sound like the Bush administration is sure the surge is going to keep.Why does McCain and Palin keep saying the surge has worked and that the war has been won.It is not won nor will it be such until we don’t have to keep troops there in substantial numbers.The republicans are painting a rose colored picture but if you look very carefully you will see it start to fade.We don’t no what Palin is really about until the debates.That is if the media is not afraid to question her.There is going to be some that will bring up sexism but if she wants to run she should be questioned just as Hillary was.She came out swinging like she could stand up to the world so she should be able to take some questions.She is going to have to deal with much more than a few questios from reporters.

Posted by: damehen | September 9, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

McCain offers what Americans really want: a genuine commitment to bipartisanship and unity. Respect for people of both parties, as partially evidenced by a commitment to cabinet of mixed party. Pride in what we accomplish, but an expectation that we can do even better. Accountability, so that the best ideas achieve success and the bad ideas don’t. Obama is inspiring that he has a vision of a new direction, but sadly much of it so far is polarized and simply “anti Bush” rather than a method of reconciliation or a pathway to unity. One of McCain’s central tenets of his “Country First” agenda is not a nationalistic cry, but rather an admonition: “Don’t be selfish.” These elections seem to almost demand that the candidates be extremists; I am glad that one party put forth a moderate centrist. I would much rather Americans pull together than have a tug-of-war.

Posted by: HawkTheSlayer | September 9, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Anyone that knows me knows that I usually keep my opinions to myself …at least on things like religion and politics. I’m a 28 year old white female from a small town in NC. I do mortgage lending for a local bank, have been married for 8 years and have no kids.
I tell you all of this in order for you to realize that I’m a pretty average person.
I’m sitting on my couch today September 9th, 2008 sick with a cold and watching ABC News with Charles Gibson. I am absolutely astounded at what I just saw. So astounded in fact that if I hadn’t just looked up what I saw at http://www.abcnews.com I would almost believe I had taken too much cold medicine.
I’m referring to a segment that just aired in which the topic of discussion is the shift in the polls of white women voters. More importantly, I’m referring to a statistic that was mentioned. In a nutshell it was stated that people who are voting based on the issues Obama is leading and that people who are voting on “personal quality” McCain is leading.
It was also mentioned that in the very close election of 2000 Gore lead in people voting on issues and Bush lead in people voting on “personal quality”.
Am I the only one completely outraged that the American public would be so ignorant as to vote on “personal quality”?
I could go on and on about how this is simply insane and a complete embarrassment to the voters of America. However, instead I will make a simple plea:
Please Please Please be an informed voter. Whether you vote for Obama, McCain, or you write someone in – please vote for the issues and the person that you think can best serve America. Don’t vote for someone because they chose a female VP running mate or because someone would be the first black president. Please be an educated voter – even if you just read up on 1 or 2 of the most important issues to you. Vote for a VALID reason.

Posted by: Nicole | September 9, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

Obama the great wonder of the world has called Sarah Palin a “Pig with Lipstick” and referenced her to “stinky old fish” now that’s the kind of classy guy I want for my Pres. Wonder what the women of America will say when it gets played over and over. I bet he learned to treat his women from Rev. Jeremiah Wright………….McCain / Palin 08′

Posted by: Obama_EmptySuit | September 9, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Not about racism,??? I live in the red state of KY. and I can tell you that there are many a redneck here that will not be voting for a “black man”. I am a white woman and I did not intend to become an Obama supporter. But,,,Geez look what it takes to get the Reps. excited… The old soldier…wasn’t enough by himself so they get a cross between a far right hockey mom and a pitt bull??? Come on ladies!!! From Hillary to Palin??? Just as Obama’s selection in Biden was to make up for his lack of foreign affairs experience, so is McCains selection in Palin to make up for his lack in appeal to women and change. Palin is the political move to get you off focus and it’s working. Think about how much change do you really think McCain is going to have with a Democratic House and Senate which they just took back in Nov, 06??? Seriously we can do better…

Posted by: braith | September 9, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Today Obama made this statement “You can put lipstick on a PIG and its still a PIG.”. Biden made similar statement but mentioned Palin by name. Obama’s camp said Obama was talking about McCain not Palin. It dos not matter if Obama was talking about McCain or Palin. It is unacceptable for him to call either one of them a PIG.

Posted by: rick | September 9, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

McCain used the same pig line in May and once before that-
I am embarrassed for women and so angry that women across the country are falling for this move by McCain. I am middle aged, white, professional and have always voted Republican. I fell for the fear tactics in 2004 and voted to stay safe, what a fool. But this year the issues are too important- I want this WAR to end today, I want to get out of debt, I want my kids and grandkids to be safe, and I want people to respect our government and our leaders. But all women can tell me is that they “like her” , but why??? When we start to discuss her beliefs, they seem shocked, but they are falling for it. This was a cynical pick and so disrespectful to hard working women all over this country- I was hoping this election we would be smarter.

Posted by: betty | September 9, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Could any expert please explain to me the ” black vote solidity” in this election? Or i will be labeled as a racist since i ask this question?

Posted by: question | September 9, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

I am a white 51 year old women. Catholic.
Married. Mother. Educator.
I would like to know the breakdown of women polled by state,age,race,
level of education and religion. When a news org performs a poll it is their responsibility to provide ALL the pertinent data.
Personally, I can’t imagine any educated woman voting for Palin.
I am a very strong supporter of Obama. I became interested in his work when he was a state senator in 1999, and even more so in 2004, when he was elected to the U.S. Senate. I have done my homework on his track record and position of the issues.
I am convinced he is the hope of America. Primarily, because as our leader he will be accepted by all of those around the world, and in this country, who have come to doubt and hate Americans because of our racism, because of our lack of compassion, our greed and our single mindedness. The hope I see is best described as a unifying force. A force that can transform our country and extend healing bridges to our adversaries.
All Women would do well to unite FOR Obama!

Posted by: 51yearsold | September 9, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Hillary really won the most votes in the primaries but was blocked by the good ole boys rigging the delegates in favor of Obama. Then Obama went on a huge arrogant ego trip and thought he could win without Hillary on the ticket. Obama now has a rude awakening for his hautiness. McCain had the courage to put a woman on the ticket and now Sarah Barracuda is going to defeat Barry Obomber.

Posted by: Doreen | September 9, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

You insisted that Hillary’s Supporters would shift over to Obama after they were done pouting… It is that type of sexist attitude in the media that is bringing us over to McCain/Palin. We are women over 40 who understand Sales & Marketing – many of us are in that field ourselves & we are not going to buy the Pepsi like Campaign that won Barack the Nomination. “We’re the Ones We’ve Been Waiting For” – you expected us to be stupid enough to buy that crap. We’re intelligent – we see through both the Covert attacks from the Obama Campaign just as easily as the Overt ones from all the rest. We do our homework – we read everything we can get our hands or eyes on and we read between the lines. The media has manipulated the election process from the beginning and we will not be told who to vote for. Warning: The more you smear Sarah Palin, the more determined we will be out there garnering votes for the McCain/Palin ticket. Believe it – Report it – It’s True!

Posted by: Juli An | September 9, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

White, 40-something, Christian, married, mom, graduate degreed, part-time employee, social moderate, fiscal conservative who believes in choice, gun control, the death penalty and no vouchers (though my kids attend private school). Still haven’t found a candidate or a party, though I know I won’t find one in total agreement with all my stances. Swore I’d never vote for McCain because he cheated on his first wife and family; but the more I research Obama, the more I think his talk is just that—talk. I’d like to sit this one out, but almost 90 years ago women made major sacrifices so I could vote, so as women we all have that responsibility (and would lose the right to complain as my husband says). Just wish there were a real choice.

Posted by: LagunaTriMom | September 10, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Obama and Dems insulted me so terribly in the primaries. Clinton might forgive Obama, but I dislike the guy. Can’t help it, he’s not worthy and the Kennedy, Biden, Dole, Byrd old boys club makes me sick to my stomack. Manipulating and lying for votes is one thing, stealing the uncommitted of Michigan and strongarm four delegates from Clinton, which she won, broke with everything I believe.
For democracy they don’t deserve to win, so country first speaks volumes for McCain. With Palin on the ticket, it becomes almost a no-brainer.

Posted by: Sylvia Johnsen | September 10, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

the stakes are too high to be transfixed on personalities.

Posted by: r0o0by | September 10, 2008, 6:46 am 6:46 am

As I read the posts here, I can’t stop asking the question;why are former Hillary supporters so mad at and resentful of Obama? It seem as if you are so hell bent on voting against Obama instead of voting for McCain.It also lead me to believe some of you are more concerned with voting for a woman than the issues she stand for.Have we as a country really sunk that low? One of the most dustrubing aspects is you are making This decision without really knowing what she even stand for. Please take a step back and ask yourself if you are making an informed decision or being distracted?

Posted by: VLamont | September 10, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

I have a hard time understanding how Gov. Palin is viewed as “the best person for the job”. In the days since she accepted the V.P. GOP nomination she has repeatedly stated falsehoods concerning her actions and her views. Her religious zeal scares the hell out of me. It seems that everything she mentions from the war in Iraq to the Alaskan pipeline is “God’s Will”. We’ve taken prayer out of the schools, why can’t we take religion out of government. It is not God’s plan to be at war. It is not God’s plan to build an oil pipeline. God does not place American interests above all others. I, myself, believe in the theory of evolution with all the PROOF we have been provided with to make that decision. She has blown onto the scene like a whirlwind and the republican party loves the fact that all the attention is now on her life and her religious zealousness. It takes the attention away from just how poorly the republicans have handled government for most of the decade. Everyone is more interested in whether Palin has told truth/lies in her statements rather than the REAL issues at hand. How can we truly turn this country around and offer the american citizen a better way of life. I am in no way a sexist and I find it hard to believe that so many women seem to be getting onboard the “Palin” bandwagon, all in the name of the feminist movement. I have supported Obama throughout this campaign, but I really would not have been upset if Hillary had won the nomination. I feel that she was more than qualified to head the democratic ticket. But I mean this with all my being…..Sarah Palin is no Hillary Clinton…..and for women to swarm to her just because she is a female actually saddens me when our country is in such state. The wealthy have been getting rediculously richer during this decade, while the working class has continually watched their dollar do less. The only thing that hasn’t dissapointed me is the lengths the republican party will go to in effort to retain the power. I, for one, have long tired of the “scare” tactics by the republican party. The supposed support of religious groups to harbor their vote. The stand against abortion. You women fought long and hard for many years to have the choice, and now you seem so prepared to throw that right away. The “kid gloves” that many feel that Palin must be treated with disgusts me also. If Obama’s oldest daughter was a few years older and pregnant and unmarried, this election would be over with all ready…..but don’t mention Sarah’s little girl. It seems to me, the condition her daughter is in should help lend to her wanting sex education available to our children. Doesn’t appear that the old “abstinence” only policy worked out to well there in the Palin household. I have entirely to much respect for women and their fight for equality to be able to comprehend how Sarah Palin could be seen as “the answer”. My mother was a working women, had five children, an old school husband who waited for his dinner to be served him even though my mother had worked the same eight hour day, but no way in hell did that balancing act make her “presidential candidate” material. She would have been the first one to make that statement. Please……women……..Sarah is no Hillary……don’t let your vote rest on the simple fact that she is a female.

Posted by: DWillits | September 10, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

It is not surprising that majority of white women are shifting towards white candidates in this election. Mr. Langer’s data suggest from a historical baseline that the white-Americans in general tend to vote for the candidates that are more conservative from center(relative term). As for women voting based on gender alone is something not easily measured, but I would venture to say that race is important consideration along with gender to voters.
When it comes to trailblazing the path for women in presidential politics, Hillary Clinton and Sara Palin are newcomers. I shall never forget Congresswoman Shirley Chisolm run for the President in 1972. Although, I am not Afro-American or female, Ms. Chisholm gender and color were unimportant to me, but as a young man, I was touched by her spirit and ideas to change public policy and culture to reflect a world with parity for all. I must say, Shirley Chisholm’s agenda did not garner much support in 1972 from women or men voters regardless of color (Nixon was the man with voters in 1972).
It is very possible that as in 1972, the double edge sword of being a Afro-American or women candidate in 2008 will play out the expected and in-the- box response from voters based on culture and political bias from years passed. Change from the past would be historic, change from the past with purpose, parity, and competencies, would be a step forward for all.

Posted by: threeriverscrossing | September 10, 2008, 11:46 am 11:46 am

The stakes are too high, the economy is in trouble, unemployment, foreclosures, businesses closing and THE WAR! Listen to what each plans to do to help our situation! Do we want to continue this downward sprial or go in a different direction? The choice should be simple.

Posted by: Black & Beautiful | September 10, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

I must agree with 3rivers, although I was not able to vote in 1972, I vaguely remember thinking it would be great if she won, but there was no excitement. Democrats finally have a candidate who could and I hope will offer us “Change we can believe in!” I’m Black, Christian, married, socially moderate, fiscally conservative and work full-time. I believe we should be the change we want to see in this world! Let’s change America! Fighting is not the answer-let’s unite and find REAL solutions to America’s ills. Go OBAMA’08!

Posted by: Black , Beautiful, Female & Proud | September 10, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

First of all, I’d like to know how I can get in on some of these polls. Nobody asked me, or my friends, or my family, or anybody I know. So how “solid” are these numbers?
Secondly, McCain’s speech was all about fighting. Fight for this, fight for that. Personally, I’m tired of fighting. I just want to be able to raise my kids and live live to the best of my ability. The American Dream.
Last, Palin speaks so adamantly on a perspective that she’s never had to experience (rape and incest). If I was going to vote for McCain before, I’m not now.
Undecided at best, but it won’t be McCain/Palin.

Posted by: WomanVoter | September 10, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

“he’s not worthy and the Kennedy, Biden, Dole, Byrd old boys club makes me sick to my stomach.” Add Pelosi and Reid to that list. Barack Obama will sign anything they send to him since he’s never stood up to any of them.
One of Bush’s many and biggest mistakes was giving Congress everything it wanted. The only way to get this country back on track is to have a President willing to use the veto. John McCain will do that.

Posted by: texbad | September 10, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

This is a response to ANOTHER SARAH.
Please tell me that you aren’t serious! First off, you say that Sarah Palin has 5 teeneagers at home who are all at an impressionable age. That would be lie number 1. Only 3 of her 5 children are teenagers, and her oldest will be 20 within the year, so if elected, she would have 2 teeneage children to deal with, not 5.
Secondly, no not every candidate is asked if they will be able to do their job and be a parent. I never heard Barack Obama asked a single time how he was going to find the time to raise his 2 cute kids and have the most important job in the world! Even during his debates with Hillary, while Clinton was peppered with questions, Barack was lobbed slow pitch softball after softball. The only criticism he faced so far at all is because reverend Wright accused the US government of genocide against black America. Liberals tried to call this a racially motivated attack and said Rev. Wrights opinions should not reflect on Obama. Wright was not just a preacher from Baracks church, but he married Obama and his wife, was a frequent guest at their home for dinner, and was Barack’s campaign spiritual advisor! It’s funny how America has now been so innundatted with “white guilt” that it’s no longer ok to question when a minority candidate when they are associated closely with someone accusing his own country of genocide! Liberals then tried to counter saying McCain accepted an endorsement ment from an evangelical Rev. John Hagee. Accepting an endorsement from someone is not the same as sitting in that person’s church for 20 years every week, having that person marry you and your spouse, having that person become part of your life, and be an influential spiritual advisor as well. But Democrats love comparing apples and oranges! LOL
Back to you Another Sarah!
“I’m more concerned on making the point that I cannot entrust my baby’s future to a party that wrecklessly thrusted us into a war that never should have been waged.”
Are you referring to the Democratic Party that got us involved in the Vietnam War that took 58 thousand American Lives? Or are you trying to put Iraq on the same level? You talk about McCain committing our future children there indefinitely. The fact is that McCain said we will stay there as long as it takes to win. We still have troops on the South Korean Border 50 years after the Korean Conflict, yet I don’t hear any Americans complaining! The middleeast has such a history of war, perhaps a peace keeping force there would not be so bad! More American kids are shot and killed on the streets of the United states every year, than are shot and killed in Iraq…that’s a sad fact that you need to deal with! And before you ask yes, I am definitely on the Democrat’s side when it comes to gun control. While innercity people who live near police stations have less need for guns, there are still people who don’t live a mile from a police station and do actually want and need their right to bear arms.
As to your point about America’s current mortgage crisis, you should look and see that nearly half of the failing loans were made during the Clinton era. Bill was the benefit of Nafta creating 3 million jobs in 1993 and from 1993-2000 many American’s bought their first homes. Clinton said himself in 1993 that he was afraid of what would happen 12-15 years later when those jobs were outsourced by corporations, but he went along with NAFTA anyway. Low and behold, he was right. Our manufacturing jobs are being outsourced, and those people who were first time home buyers can no longer afford their mortgages! Clinton and Bush are equally responsible for the sad state of America today. It’s not about republicans or democrats, and it’s idiots like you who regurgitate Keith Olberman, or idiots from the right who spew their Limbaugh filled rants that make me sick. You have no concept of what either candidate brings to the table because the fact is that you knew who you were gonna vote for before either party chose a candidate! An idiot like you just needs to be told WHY you are voting for that person by the media. It’s called “manufacturing consent” as Noam Chomsky would put it!

Posted by: Greg | September 11, 2008, 1:17 am 1:17 am

This isn’t high school. Popularity contests won high school SCA elections, but this is our lives, our childrens’ futures and the future of our country. While everybody is concerned about lipstick and old fish, we have record budget deficits, high unemployment, home foreclosures, bank failures and now the big 3 auto makers are looking for a handout. Palin/McCain-yes, Palin has stolen McCain’s thunder, are just repeating the same old lines but are not giving any really hard facts about the issues. People wake up!!!! I’m Christian, Black, 38, single- mother B.A. degree, U.S. Army veteran and an Obama supporter. This election is too important to throw it for who you want to have a beer/dinner with. The majority of the people I know just want to be able to put gas in the car to go to the grocery store to purchase groceries they cannot afford to feed their own families.

Posted by: yeswecaninva | September 11, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

The movement among Catholic women is interesting considering the virulent anti-Catholicism typical among western fundamentalists of Palin’s stripe. I suspect eastern Catholics are largely unaware of this. My state (Oregon) had big upsurges of KKK activity in the middle of the last century & it was entirely anti-Catholic, not anti black. Although I’ve heard a number of fundamentalists argue that most Catholics- hispanics and Italians certainly- are non-white. There even an argument they sometimes make that while pale, the Irish are of a more primitive race descended from the Neanderthals.
Hagee’s anti-Catholic rants are not an exception.

Posted by: Sally | September 11, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

THANK YOU GREG!!! You took the words right out of my mouth. It makes me want to pull my hair out of my head, how easily swayed people are by Obama’s pretty speeches. People need to actually look at the facts.

Posted by: Jessica | September 11, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

I can tell you one huge reason why we will all be better off with McCain than Obama (besides all the scary religious and black racists background information out there).
Ethanol.
Obama is for it, McCain is against it. Since the implemantation and of law pushed thru the senate by Harry Reid(D)food prices have soared. Reason? Making fuel from corn. Its just a bad idea to burn your food source. Farmers dont want to grow wheat because corn brings more money in. The result? Higher bread prices. Corn prices have doubled. The result? Higher feed prices for all livestock. Catfish farmers are going out of business. All meet and poultry has skyrocketed. McCains energy plan is much better than Obama’s and it will greatly affect your lives. As for all you poor people out there….you dont pay taxes anyways so what are you afraid of?

Posted by: Jeff | September 11, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Race, Race, Race! Is that all you air heads can talk about? There is so much more going on in this world!
Well one things for sure America still has a lot of growing up to do!

Posted by: Bea Smit | September 11, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

Can we please stop looking a race and/or gender?! I am black and a woman and I am not looking at race or gender. I am voting for the 1ST preson on the ticket not the VP. Yes we do have to consider the VP because they are the next in charge I am look at who shares my views. OBMAMA to me has a good plan for health care that is why I am going to vote for him 11/4/2008.
PLEASE LOOK AT THE ISSUES.
REMEMEBER: Just because Alaska is close to Russia does not mean she is ready to take on forigen policies. She wants to drill and not put the polor bears on the endanreged speices list. She does not believe that humans are responiable for golbal warming. Look at the Discovery Channel and you will learn that we responsiable and drilling and buring oil is the main cause and we will not have any oil to drill in the next 50 to 60 years.

Posted by: Black and a Woman in the USA | September 12, 2008, 1:56 am 1:56 am

Remember the issues, we are in two wars,gas and food prices are soaring, education is in trouble, jobs are being lost, economy is bad,world isolation, and our debt is growing 10 billion a onth while the Iragi govt bank 70 billion a month to help their economy, and if you want 4 more years of the same, then vote for the Republicans and if you want some change and fresh new ideas, then vote for Obama and Biden.
Either way, done vote because of race and gender. Remember, Congress is who represents the American people and they come from our states,towns and cities across America. It takes more than 4 people to run this country. Don’t get sidetracked and forget about the real and the big picture. The country is in a mess and we the people must maintain control of our feelings and emotions and work together as one. This is not a black,white,brown,or yellow issue.
This is about the lives of the American people and the course we set for the next four years. Ask yourself are you much better off and can you support 4 years of what? I hope you have an answer you can live with.

Posted by: Mylinda | September 12, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

The reality is that women will support a qualified bright woman. The gender issue is often unfair to women…they are equally capable and can handle a lot of tough situations. Go Sarah Palin!

Posted by: barontwo | September 12, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

What about Black women? or don’t we matter? Why are Black women invisible in this survey. As a matter of fact, that’s all I seem to be hearing “white women are leaning more to the McCain/Palin ticket” and how much white women related to the barracuda/hockey mom/pit bull! How well do Black women relate to her or how well does she relate to Black women. Let’s hear some discussion about that!

Posted by: Carole | September 12, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Are you better off than you were 8 years ago? Our familiy isn’t. I can’t find a job. Our neighbors are in foreclosure. Our town had to raise sales taxes to keep our firemen. My kids’ schools have less teachers and more students. We need economic security. My grandkids will be paying Bush’s bills. People. This hub bub is all just distraction from things that will impact each of us in the next 4 years. Are you better off than you were 8 years ago? If not, do what Ronald Reagan urged and vote against the Political Party that has been in power.

Posted by: Just Another Mom | September 13, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

Whether man or woman, if a politician has to be defended from questions from a talkshow host or newscaster, then that person is too weak to be in office. The Presidency is a tough job, not a figurehead position. And a VP has had to step into the Presidency all too often. Look at some clips of Margaret Thatcher in Parliament. She was a tough politician first and a lady second. My kids deserve someone who can defend them, not need defending. Our family is not better off than 8 years ago. Are you?

Posted by: Just Another Mom | September 13, 2008, 1:58 am 1:58 am

Why is your poll alway’s different than most of all the other polls? Charles Gibson was so wrong on his interview with Sarah Palin, which is a wonderful lady, and he was trying to embarrass her, but he did not, score Sarah 1- Charlie 0. Get over it, John McCain and Sarah Palin is going to be the next President and VP of America.
Sarah Palin so so much smsrter than that brain woman Nacy Poliso, Now that scares me that she is Third in line for President.
I notice that you all said that President Bush rating is low as Jimmy Carter. What about your Democrat Congress and Senator’s, I wouldn’t want you to have and say something bad about that crew. You talk about LOW, They are the LOWEST, Is it about time for them to get their raise.
Well, I’m tired of writing to somebody that is going to throw this in the trash and pat yourself on the back and think, how great you think you are. Now that’s funny. I don’t care what you think—-that’s funny.

Posted by: Bill | September 13, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

well put…Trackback

Posted by: Tex Dad | September 13, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm

So black and white woman, your only reference for your science comments on global warming is a biased Discovery Channel and you like the Canadian health care system?

Posted by: fred | September 13, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

I’m amazed that any decent black person would vote for Obama. Why would Obama spend so many years in a church lead by a bigot? You will never sell me on the idea that he didn’t know where he was going to church.
It’s the same as his decision to start sell the pro gun thing. Now it’s okay to have guns, even though he has never voted for a pro second amendment bill. He is a liar, period. He needs Pennsylvania and he knows he won’t get it unless he fools the public.

Posted by: kennedy | September 13, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

I care about this election and have been out canvassing. People are about evenly split with the Obama supporters being more passionate about the need to change the direction of the country, wrest away republican control of the WH and enact different policies.
It’s a tough fight but we’re hopefull – I’m voting to put someone SMART in the White House.

Posted by: citizen Voter | September 13, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Listening to Sarah Palin convinced this woman how wrong the McCain/Palin ticket is. She casually discusses entering into battle with Russia – reminds you about McCain casually saying bomb bomb Iran. Neither of these idiots bothers to think about the benefits versus the costs. Our military is already threadbare – it will take years of increased military spending to restore our military equipment to a state of readiness and our volunteer army is too lean with the stop loss abuse.

Posted by: Disgusted in Florida | September 13, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

You would think that women all over this country were absolutely mesmerized by Sarah Palin and totally forgetting everything they strongly believed in. While I am not convinced that everything written or said about her is true, she did answer Charlie Gibson on some specific issues. Charlie asked, “Do you believe that Roe vs Wade should be overturned?” Her definitive answer was “Yes.” She further elaborated she’s against a woman’s right to choose even in cases of rape and incest. Secondly, she’s for “VICTORY” in Iraq. I wish someone would ask her what this victory would look like, 5, 10, 15 years from now. She claims that Hillary Clinton and her have a lot in common. The fact is that everything Hillary Clinton has worked for in the past 30 years, Sarah Palin is opposed to.
Vote your with conscience, vote for the person who stands for what you believe in!

Posted by: Hillary voters for McCain are wrong | September 13, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

What a joke. Self appointed ‘patriots’ who out of fear, greed and ignorance have consistently supported most incompetent government in American history. These idiots have managed to bring the greatest country in the world down to the point where we may already not have a future because we are so far in debt to the rest of the world. Go ahead, vote for McCain and Palin, two nitwits who will seal the deal. Just don’t pretend to be loyal to anything beyond your own narrow minded and obsolete view of the world.

Posted by: salerno | September 14, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Dear, IAT Smith you act as if the “change” platform is something new to politics. I remember one Ronald Reagan used this in his campaign against Jimmy Carter. And every politian since has used this. It’s old!!!! Frankly it ticks me off!! There is nothing new to what Obama is saying or doing it’s all the same talk. Frankly if there was someone other than McCaine to vote for I would. Both sides are using fear tactics!! No one is talking about the issues. They are blameing each other for a few failed policies. Same ohh same ohh

Posted by: Tony Rogers | September 15, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

You do realize that Sarah Palin would probably make a good hockey mom. She will not make a good VP or Pres. She is clueless about national politics. McCain is simply too old and too set in the 1950′s. We need people who look forward to the future and improve humanity rather than looking back to 1950′s white America (that by the way never existed for the black, yellow, brown and red peoples in this country) as the pinnacle of human civilization. I am just happy it looks like Barrack is out in front and people who want to blow up small countries and mix church and state will at least be out of the government for a little while so main street and other corners of America can be represented rather than the lobbyists of the corporatocracy.

Posted by: dudenoway | September 28, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

It sickens me that we also have to go back to race and what bugs me the most is Obama’s mother was a white female so why is he just considered black? and why does it matter? He is an intelligent man no very capable of running our country and had proved that as far as I am concerned and the outer layer of him should not matter, haven’t we gotten past that yet? I live for the day that we can treat each other with respect for who we are and how we treat others and our ability to do the best job rather than the color of our skin. It is shameless in 2008 to still be discussing this…he is a man of many races just like most of us in the United States of American, he just happens to have a beautiful skin color.

Posted by: pamela | October 3, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.