Why Isn’t Palin Coming to Washington to Work on the Bailout Bill?
Why isn’t Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., bringing Gov. Sarah Palin to Washington, D.C., to help hammer out the compromise on the bailout bill?
After attending McCain’s speech at the Clinton Global Initiative this morning, Palin is scheduled to head to Philadelphia and be down for the rest of the day.
If this crisis is so serious McCain needs to suspend his campaign activities and cancel his appearance at the first presidential debate, why would Palin not be there with him in Washington, D.C?
I know her office is in Juneau, not D.C., but surely, the governor McCain insists is "absolutely" qualified to run the Free World would have some contribution to make. Surely, her presence is needed at such a dire time.
No?
- jpt
UPDATE: Let me make clearer what exactly I mean. Many conservative Republicans in the House and, to a lesser degree, the Senate are thinking of voting against this bill. Palin could work with them, lobby them, be a liaison to them from the McCain campaign. There is still a huge public advocacy component to this bill — the American people aren’t yet sold on the need for this bill, nor are they sold on the bill itself — so, Palin could help explain to the public, via press conferences or interviews, why it’s needed. Even though she’s a governor, not a senator or congresswoman, she is the vice presidential nominee of her party and, as such, could make suggestions on how to improve the bill. But I’m sorry to read from McCain-supporting posters that so few of them seem to have any regard for what Gov. Palin could contribute at such a time! I don’t share your views.
UPDATE 2: Why isn’t Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., back in D.C? A perfectly legitimate question, as well. Of course, there are differences. Biden’s campaign didn’t announce it was suspending operations until this bill had been worked out, and it seems as though Republican support for this bill is more of an issue than Democratic support, so Biden’s lobbying isn’t as needed. But certainly a senior senator such as Biden could be helpful in rallying support for the compromise among the public — a totally legitimate point.
Email
Santorum Clarifies Concerns on Women in Combat
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
There are moose to be dressed.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 7:37 am 7:37 am
Actually, after the U.N. a little Economics 101 a the Capitol would have been a good plan.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 7:39 am 7:39 am
jm.
I think you missed the title of this thread.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
Hey Jake — maybe you should run for President. Then you could have your very own VP candidate. You could have them do whatever you want!!
I realize that blogging doesn’t require all the standards of real journalism, but this post is pretty weak.
Posted by: jrock | September 25, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
Because she is a Governor.
The head of the party the presidential candidate is there. The democratic party leader had to be summoned from a Flordia resort.
Posted by: smith | September 25, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am
Palin doesn’t know anything to help with the bailout.
Posted by: Carrie | September 25, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am
Where’s Joe Biden???? McCain,Obama, Biden have a day job, it is called U.S. Senator!!! There job is to take care of our country, thats what they were sworn to do!! There is no doubt in my mind that McCain does not need 3 days to get ready for a debate, Why does Obama!! Let’s get Obama out of the gym and back to DC to take care of America’s business!!
Posted by: Sa1950 | September 25, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am
She should be there. Her party is willing to do this country harm by not allowing this bill to pass. I’d these companies fair millions of Americans will be effected. She should be there to provide leadership to her party. McCain is treating her like such a wimp. I’m sorry McCain is sexist against Palin. She is to be seen but not heard.
Posted by: MIMS NJ | September 25, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
And yes, I’m drinking the McCain Kool-Aid. I know better than anyone that Palin is not qualified to be president or Vice-President. But I spit out these Republican talking points because it’s the only thing we have left.
Posted by: smith | September 25, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
“Why isn’t Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., bringing Gov. Sarah Palin to Washington, DC, to help hammer out the compromise on the bailout bill? ”
she’s not a congressman or a senator!
Posted by: trettione | September 25, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am
She should at least get to see how big government works for when she hast to take over.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
She went to the U.N. and she isn’t an Ambassador either.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
mccain and palin—wow just like dumb and dumber——the –d— student and the journalism student—-the new financial wizards—–mccain needs to quit trying to grandstand–we dont need the show,
Posted by: rodney | September 25, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
Sarah Miss Alaska Congeniality Palin is a journalist, there is nothing to communicate during financial crisi, so she has to rest after her intensive iunternship at the UN. God save America from McPalin.
Posted by: BKMC | September 25, 2008, 7:51 am 7:51 am
McCain isn’t even on any of the relevant committees. He’s not even invited to any of the meetings in which the deal will be worked out. He’s literally not even allowed in the room. This whole stunt is a joke. Especially coming from a guy who has admitted repeatedly that he knows virtually nothing about economics. What’s he gonna contribute?
Posted by: ElodieStClair | September 25, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am
I think Jake may be pointing out that if this happened in a few months after McCain is rendered incompetent, Ms.Palin would be the deer in the headlights that Bush was last night.
Isn’t that a comforting thought.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am
mccain could take palins minister along and join in the witch hunt—-wow this is the goofiest repub party ever.hope mccain does not think he is a georgian today.
Posted by: rodney | September 25, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
And this stupid meeting b/w the white house and the candidates isn’t being held till 4pm this afternoon!?!?
Hell…a deal will be worked out by then.
I hope my fellow Americans aren’t dumb enough to think McCain was/is actually putting country first…its campaign first. Has been and always will be.
There’s maverick and then there’s reckless. He’s the latter.
Posted by: dave | September 25, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am
Interesting that although Biden is the senior senator, Obama does not appear to be working with him on “joint statements” or “positions”.
Why isn’t Jake just as curious about Obama and Biden?
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am
I don’t see why Palin shouldn’t be there. She can contribute as much to the negotiations as McCain can. Which is nothing.
Heck, why don’t they invite me over? I’ll just get in the way as well. Hey, let’s all go! We’ll make a party of it.
Posted by: Aengil | September 25, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am
What is Obama’s position on this problem?
“If they tell me I can be helpful then I’ll be there.”
They haven’t told him.
If that doesn’t say what fellow Dems think of Obama’s problem solving capabilities and his ability to “reach across the aisle to provide solutions”, what does?
Dems tell Obama, “Stay away, we don’t need you!!!”
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 8:06 am 8:06 am
you have to agree that we need to fire the deregulation people——goodbye mccain
Posted by: rodney | September 25, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am
I think her being there is not a bad idea. But which Democratic Senator would give her the time of day?
Posted by: drjohn | September 25, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am
You have to agree, even Dems don’t want Obama around to solve any problem of importance.
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am
rodney,
Why don’t Dems want Obama around?
What are they afraid of?
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Palin isnt a congressman or senator, and if you missed it. While mccain is spewing his devotion, Obama was the one who had been contacting the senate and speaking with his peers about this issue, also stating if they need him there he will come. Mccain wasnt making calls. This is yet another ploy for his campaign. As far as President of Pakistan meeting Palin and stating no wonder AMericans like you, you are gorgeous. I find that offensive, that also shows me they wont take her seriously. Palin has fumbled on issues even for the FEW times she has spoken. People this is NOT the ticket to be on, it will be worse than it is now. Its time for change and Obama is it.
Posted by: Terri for change | September 25, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Maybe because a lot of you don’t realize WE HAVE A CURRENT ADMINISTRATION AND A FUTURE ADMINISTRATION. Palin is not a part of the CURRENT administration. Obama is a part of the current administration and instead of volunteering to do HIS job, he needed a special invitation from the president. Why don’t you ask that question Jake, why did he need a special invite to haul his butt back to DC to try to help the country…oh that’s right he’s too busy helping himself.
Posted by: samhiguchi | September 25, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Gimme a break, Jake. One, why isn’t there an unbiased title like “Why are the VP’s invited?” Two, Bush didn’t invite them. Three, it’s to actually help the situation, not create another photo op.
Posted by: Emm | September 25, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
Palin is doing her homework assignment she got from Katie Couric to find when he was for wall street regulation other than this political campaign
“I will find that and bring it to ya”
Posted by: watching | September 25, 2008, 8:15 am 8:15 am
correction: “Why aren’t the VP’s invited?”
Posted by: Emm | September 25, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
The dems don’t want Obama around because they don’t want him to take the fall if something goes wrong. And Obama doesn’t want to be around. The dems and Obama want to be able to blame everyone else when the bail-out fails.
Posted by: tina | September 25, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
IF Obama COULD be helpful he would be there.
Dems have said, “Stay away”
That’s all that needs to said about what fellow Dems think about his abilities.
As far as insults to Palin, Dems have said far worse.
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am
both mccain and obama would only take atten.away from the problem —–mccain is the reason this is happening —he is the guy that pushed deregulation—-now he wants to grandstand–and lie some more—-our government does not run by one person.neither he or obama but congress will deal with this problem—-but point the finger at mccain.
Posted by: rodney | September 25, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
If you want to defend Palin for not being in the washington administration. Then she has time to go to Alaska and deal with her administration scandals which she is hiding from also.
Posted by: really | September 25, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Perhaps Jake it is because she is not a Congressman or a Senator like Biden, Obama, and McCain. Bush invited McCain and Obama.
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Is Joe Biden going to be there? If he is is as as Senator should he be there?
Since Sarah is a Gov. not a Congresswoman or Senator what would she do?
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | September 25, 2008, 8:24 am 8:24 am
Jake, I think Palin’s interviews with Charlie, and with Katie Couric, gave the answer to your questions.
Apart from remembering and citing some basic GOP talking points, she knows nothing about anything.
Posted by: herta | September 25, 2008, 8:26 am 8:26 am
PALIN IS NOT COMING BECAUSE—SHE HAS GOTTEN LOST ON THE BRIDGE TO NOWHERE—MOOSEHUNTING
Posted by: rodney | September 25, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
MCain is using this to not have to debate. He knows he is down in the polls and is trying anything to recover. I think most Americans would rather see this debate.Many people are undecided and REALLY want to “size” these two up side by side. What can McCain do by suspending his campaign. Plus WHO CARES if Palin is there. She knows nothing anyway…
Posted by: newkid | September 25, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Democrats are working to get this deal done. Republicans are bucking the process. The deal must get done, so McCain needs to get his party in line because clearly the president can not. Republicans are grand standing and not getting the job done. Palin should be there to ‘fire up her base’. Or perhaps the only thing republicans are ‘fired up’ for is bashing sen. Obama. If she can’t convince her party to move on a bipartisian fashion, she is useless. The deal will get done with or without these selfish Republican twits.
Posted by: MIMS NJ | September 25, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
Dave in lv, they don’t want Obama there because he has NEVER taken a stand (and stood by it) on anything, not as a lecturer, not as a senator. They call the wind Obama. He doesn’t have ideas of his own and would have nothing to offer, except maybe a pretty speech (as long as he has his teleprompter)…
Posted by: samhiguchi | September 25, 2008, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Jake,
I’m going to spell this out for you.
Obama and McCain are sitting senators, as is Joe Biden. It is their job to be there and frankly, all three of them should have been there on Monday. The majority leader of the Senate was very clear on Tuesday that no deal was happening without John McCain. So, John McCain is coming to work the deal. Now Harry is a little worried about that for some reason.
As for Sarah, IMO, Steve Schmidt should freakin’ turn her loose. Lord knows she couldn’t do anymore damage than Joe Biden does on a daily basis. And honestly, she’d probably do a heck of a lot of good if the media would lay off of all the distractions. You know, the silly stuff like her being prayed over by some Kenyan. Wasn’t it Barack that told us we shouldn’t be worrying about such distractions?
At any rate, I don’t see why Sarah should be there. She isn’t part of the Senate and doesn’t really have a say in this for the time being.
Is this any clearer for you now?
Posted by: mom2-3 | September 25, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
I think it was a VERY bad decision for McCain to take Obama’ call at 8AM yesterday and agree to a group announcement and the go ahead himself and ask for everyone to “come together”.
Anyone who doesn’t think he is using this whole thing for political gain is grazy.
Obama is right…when you’re the president, you need to be bale to do more than one thing at a time…
Posted by: formerhillary | September 25, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
FIRED UP! READY TO VOTE! SUPPORT EARLY VOTING!!!
Observation…..Is it me or is the word UNPRECEDENTED the most popular word in this election.
The first time America and the Democratic party have a African American candidate
running for the White House the election and republican party is full of UNPRECEDENTED
events.
Sarah Palin, Canceling a debate, postponing a convention, suspending a campaign 4 weeks to election day, 700 Billion dollar legislation, joint meeting at the White House of the candidates… and i’m sure more to come.
Let us be UNPRECEDENTED and get to the polls early and VOTE, just in case in a UNPRECEDENTED action the election day in canceled.
FIRED UP! READY TO VOTE! SUPPORT EARLY VOTING!!!
Posted by: LAWRENCE | September 25, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Does ANYONE know why fellow Dems don’t find Obama would be helpful in solving this problem?
————————————-
Like McCain, he will have to sit outside the committee room like an expectant father.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
leonard
these repubs are —incouragable
Posted by: rodney | September 25, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Leonard…
This is the point exactly!!! So why suspend the most important election in our time for something you cannot control until there is a vote???
McCain is using this for political gain.
Posted by: militarymom | September 25, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
rodney,
Who wants to admit mistakes or defeat?
No one. I try to stop myself from getting angry about it.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
McSame is desperate, has not shown up in Congress since April, dragged his feet 10 days during “crisis” before this grandstand move, and he was in NY yesterday being interviewed by KC, and standing up Letterman(couldn’t handle the heat there either). Now he wants to postpone debate. He won’t allow Palin to field questions, and he rarely holds press conferences. What happened to “fundamentals of economy are sound”? Can you really run the country from a nursing home? He is obviously loosing his marbles.
Posted by: crossroads | September 25, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
militarymom,
They haven’t suspended the election yet,
only the debate. If the election gets suspended I suspect there are bigger problems than the economy.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
rodney
The reason why Dems don’t feel it would be helpful to have Obama around is because JM caused the problem and JM is a liar?
I can’t find any logic in your answer.
Why doesn’t Reid feel Obama would be helpful?
If Obama is not helpful in something this important, how could he be helpful in solving future problems?
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Samantha…Clinton is a jerk. I hope he and Hillary are permanently blackbaled fromt he party because of the way they have conducted themselves.
They have disrespected Obama at every turn. I am sure if the tables were turned, the outcome would be very different.
I am personally very disappointed in tow people I used to have great respect for.
Posted by: formerhillary | September 25, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
maybe because she is not a damn senator, it is not her current job.
Posted by: Kim | September 25, 2008, 8:42 am 8:42 am
The deregulation that McCain fought for the last 29 years is to blame for this mess.
And now McCain thinks he can claim victory for a problem he helped create?
I small a rat.. errr.. a moose. It’s HER debate he really wants to delay …… forever if possible.
Posted by: Gus | September 25, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
FormerHillary why disappointed in the Clintons What exactly is it that you want them to do? Raise their right arms at an angle of about 45 degrees above the horizontal and slightly sideways to the right while yelling Heil Obama???
Clinton’s most recent statement:
“I think you can argue that she has done more than all other runner-ups have in the Democratic Party in 40 years,” the former president said. “We have been quite clear on this. We’re not party-wreckers, and we believe that the country needs to take a different course.”
He is correct. Edwards had a lot of supporters. I don’t see him out there for Obama. Where is Jesse Jackson? Where is Gore? What has Hillary done wrong again?
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
because she is busy yelling
“First Dude! Hurry up and cut those trees down in the side yard… I need more foreign policy experience before next week and they’re blocking my view!”
Posted by: dl | September 25, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
LOL, crossroads. Let’s see, which statement was most ludicrous? McCain’s voting record for the past 15 years vs. Barry’s 143 days of having a “job” and voting present? Or, canceling the Late Show. Had he made the show, the Dems would have screamed “See, see, country first? Doing a photo op on Letterman instead of dealing with a national crisis.” You guys are unbelievable.
Posted by: Emm | September 25, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Is anyone else getting tired of Tapper’s constant advocacy and bias for the Obama campaign? Just so we’re on the same page, Mr. Tapper, were you this fired up when Obama refused to postpone the debate, even though McCain reached out to have them both in Washington to help solve the crisis?
This is the job of the US Senators. Hoe come you are not criticizing the other governors for not being there? How come the Maryland and Virginia governors are not there, and they are right next door? Hypocrite!
How did you ever make it to senior correspondent? I am just shocked and ashamed at you.
Posted by: liberati | September 25, 2008, 8:44 am 8:44 am
Last night’s Sarah Palin interview is GREAT NEWS!!! For John McCain!!!
Posted by: Congratulations to President-Elect McCain | September 25, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Now that you mention it, since McCain can’t do anything there either since he isn’t on the Banking and Finance committee, if Palin was there it would give them some quality time together.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
We should be thankful Obama is calm and letting the committees do their jobs. He’s been in contact with all parties this week, but McCain didn’t seem to have much interest till yesterday when Obama suggested a joint statement to depoliticize the issue since they were in basic agreement anyway. Then McCain made his usual impulsive decision to jump in with both feet and distract the hard-working committee members from their tasks.
Too bad McCain doesn’t have a vp who could help him out by continuing his campaign while he dons his batman suit and flies to the rescue. Obama, who actually put his country first and selected a well-qualified vp, has Biden to carry on in his stead.
Obama-Biden ’08
Posted by: EvertheOptimist | September 25, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Worthless Liberal Democrats blocked the legislation that would have brought this whole mess to light if not solved it in 2005. McCain tried to get this legislation through and Dem’s blocked it….. I’m an Independent and try to see the middle but the extremists on both sides are ruining our great country…
Posted by: TJB | September 25, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Is Biden comming back or he will busy contributing to your Gaffe list?
Posted by: frieda | September 25, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Last night’s Sarah Palin interview is GREAT NEWS!!! For John McCain!!!
—————————–
alin’s foreign policy statement:
“”I personally believe that, U.S. Americans are unable to do so, because some… people out there in our nation that don’t have maps, and I believe that our education, like such as in South Africa and the Iraq, everywhere like such as, and I believe that they should… our education over here in the U.S., should help the U.S., er, should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries so we will be able to build up our future.., for our children…”
————————————
Some people are eternal optomists, God Bless ‘em
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:46 am 8:46 am
TJB
nice try
but this has to do with regulation of people who bought those mortgages from the mortgage company and how they were sold…50 times more than the Fannie Mae and fredie mac bad bill that Mccain threw up as a red herring
nice try.
but at some point you guys have to realize facts are funny things
they catch up with you when you lie
as they keep doing.
Posted by: dl | September 25, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
I assume Biden will be there for comic relief
Or a history lesson?
Posted by: meggie | September 25, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
McCain isn’t taking Palin along because the work being done is in his official capacity as a U.S. Senator – not as a Presidential candidate. I’m sure the liberal media would love for him to take Palin along so they could all declare, “See, we told you so; this is all just political posturing”.
Rather than berating McCain for wanting to do the job he’s being paid to do — they might ask Obama why he thinks his Presidential campaign would suffer should he take a few days off it to attend to the most important legislation since the Iraq vote.
Wait a minute! It’s all becoming clear now. Obama doesn’t want to be “on the record” with a vote for or against this bailout so he can’t be held accountable down the road. After all, he didn’t have to vote on Iraq and that’s worked out very well for him. Refusing to return to Washington until prodded by the President, was Obama’s way of voting “Present”.
Posted by: marylou | September 25, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Good one, dl. Barry has much more experience dealing with reps from the land of “snow”, the ones with Columbian accents.
Posted by: Emm | September 25, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Leonard
so true
the same people that voted and fought for George Bush are now saying that Palin’s interview was (lol) good.
the buck doesn’t stop at Bush or Mccain/Palin
the buck stops with the people who voted for them.
Posted by: dl | September 25, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Palin isn’t stupid, she is just being used for something that put her way beyond her experience.
I feel sorry for her now acutally, more disgust with the thinking that allowed it.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
Who Ran those Companies…. They work for Obama….HMMMMM IT would have brought this whole mess to light years ago instead of NOW…. nice try dl
Posted by: TJB | September 25, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
Again extremist who can’t see beyond their own party lines (noses) are ruining our country
Posted by: TJB | September 25, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
dl, if the Democrats hadn’t insisted than unqualified people be given loans, there wouldn’t have been any bad mortgages to buy up.
This thing is a vicious circle that encompasses both Democrats and Republicans. The media is focusing on the Republicans errors while painting the Democrats errors as “poor hapless victims” who were sucked into bad loans.
This responsible taxpayer ain’t buyin’ it. The credit crisis runs from Wall Street to Main Street with equal blame pointed at all parties.
Posted by: marylou | September 25, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
re:Post by: Leonard Peltier | Sep 25, 2008 8:46:36 AM
Leonard, you do know of course Palin never made those comments don’t you? They were made by Miss South Carolina.
Here’s a help. One woman is blond, the other brunette. One is from South Carolina, the other from Alaska.
Best wishes
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
I believe Sarah Palin would be a tremendous aid to those in DC who are working out this bailout deal. She does have considerably more EXECUTIVE EXPERIENCE than most Senators, especially her new boss, John McCain.
Oh geez… I couldn’t even type that without spitting up coffee through my nose.
Posted by: HelpThemSeetheLight | September 25, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Maybe because she is not a member of Congress?
Posted by: linda | September 25, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
And why did Bush have to ask Obama to come?
Posted by: Matt | September 25, 2008, 8:54 am 8:54 am
As a US American, I feel good that a Mom, somebody who are a lot like my Mom , is running for Vice Presidont of the US America. Screw all those educated peoples like Obama and such. We need reel peoples that can get things finished,
Posted by: Miss South Carolina | September 25, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
Excellent comment… Dave in lv
Posted by: TJB | September 25, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Obama:
Call if you need me–I’ll pop in and vote present.
I can’t afford to give up time cramming for the debate.
Posted by: riley | September 25, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am
Apparently Miss South Carolina is ready to step in anyway.
Maybe Larry the Cable Guy can fill in for Bernenke.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Obama wants to keep his hands off this so if GOD FORBID he does become the next president and this whole plan blows up in our faces he can say he had NOTHING TO DO WITH IT!
Posted by: LInda | September 25, 2008, 8:57 am 8:57 am
Please stop the nonsense. The Couric interview yesterday was a disaster – did you hear her answer the question re Davis’ lobbyist ties? Very awkward pause there. Her selection remains a farce, and McCain’s campaign is one of gamble after another, attack after attack, distraction after distraction, and lack of transparency followed by coverup and denial. What would his administration be? This is now officially a joke. McCain does not have the temperament or judgment to lead our nation. Country first – republicans for Obama.
Posted by: Florida Republican | September 25, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
A better question would be where the hell is Biden? Last I checked Sarah Palin is not a member of Congress (and doesn’t even get along with most of her state’s delegation), but the whole democrat ticket is!
Dems (aka Tapper) are ###### because McCain’s move was a master stroke. First off they get a free ad out of Harry Reid saying McCain was the only one to save the bailout plan and lead the Senate. Then if they get the bailout done before he gets to weigh in he can criticize it all the way to the election, exactly what Reid didn’t want. If though he takes part in negotiations then it further shows how much bipartisan cred McCain has, especially as he’s going against the administration again, where Barry has none. Then McCain can make another ad about how you Barry wants to meet face to face with people like Hugo Chavez and Ahmadinejad (though his bundler Jodie Evans beat him to it) but won’t do the same for Senate republicans.
Though interesting last night who was coming back to DC? Barry! Flip flop much?
Posted by: Zaggs | September 25, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Well, at least we know where the other VP candidate Joe Biden will be…watching FDR on TV talking about the Great Depression. And he’s the one with more experience????
Posted by: Media Skeptic | September 25, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
Dave in lv,
I stand corrected, will not use that comment. Not like it matters much anyway.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
McCain didn’t take Obama’s 8:30 AM call – Obama called, but didn’t reach McCain. Your liberal media failed to fill in that fine point, preferring to lead you to believe that the two spoke.
They also didn’t tell you that McCain proposed to Bush the meeting that will take place this afternoon with both McCain and Obama present. Bush called the meeting within hours of speaking to McCain.
Posted by: marylou | September 25, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am
You go Samantha! A Hilary supporter who doesn’t support Obama, love it!
(btw, according to all the “smart” people you don’t exist.)
Posted by: Linda | September 25, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Good point Linda! Obama is also upset that it takes away from his precious study time for the debate.
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
oleg,
Separation of powers is so old school.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
BHO is probably terrified to bring Biden.
Biden has no discipline or control over his mouth. His FDR comments were worse than Quayle’s spelling gaffe.
Obama/Biden haven’t exactly been in sync this week.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 25, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Linda, exactly right. Obama is doing his best to look presidential while voting “Present”.
Posted by: marylou | September 25, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Perhaps it is because Gov Palin has no constitutional role in this Congressionally manufactured mess.
I feel so much better knowing Sen Dodd & Con Frank are working on this problem, anyway.
Posted by: ReginaldL | September 25, 2008, 9:01 am 9:01 am
Obama’s version of leadership during a time of national economic crisis: “If they tell me I can be helpful, I’ll be there…”
Think he would want to take a bit more leadership on an issue that will have huge impact on the country and his administration should he become president? No, he would have preferred to remain holed up in Florida (as he has been most of this week), preparing for a debate on foreign policy. Clueless.
As for Palin, aside from having no clue herself, she is not a member of Congress, so she does not even have a seat at the table. Guess they will call her too if she can help. Not.
Posted by: NJH | September 25, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
She is not a senator or a house representative.
Why would she need to go?
Posted by: ChuckTx | September 25, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am
The education of Sarah Palin should include a day at the Senate.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am
Separation of powers is so old school.
_______________________________________
Yes, except out founding fathers thought that it protects liberty and democracy, and aids in avoiding tyranny. But they were old school, so what did they know. After all John Addams and His wife were community organizers according to Laura Linny.
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
I think she is driving Biden to the Amtrak station. Oh wait, Biden must not have received the call that he is a Senator still and is too busy telling OH, PA, Virginia “no” to new coal plants.
Posted by: Joe | September 25, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Tapper got the talking points memo. The DNC is really scraping the bottom of the toilet now.
Posted by: linda | September 25, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Oh come on. Why isn’t Joe Biden coming, then?
Posted by: Jake | September 25, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
McCain proves once again that he puts country first.
Obama even though he is being paid to be a senator–puts himself first.
But McCain effectively threw Obama’s timing off–BO had to take time away from prepping for the debate to come out and give a speech last night.
And now BO has to come to Washington because it would have looked bad to turn down Bush.
So Barry’s prep time has been screwed up again.
Posted by: riley | September 25, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am
Last night’s Palin interview with Katie Couric was a GAME CHANGER!!! For John McCain!!!
————————————–
Indeed.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Leonard: The education of Sarah Palin should include a day at the Senate.
_____________________________________
I agree then she will only have 141 more days to go to catch up with Obama.
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
If mcvain’s antics were to portray strong leadership.. he FAILED MISERABLY
For outstanding vision and calm making the right decisions look no futher obama/biden08.
Posted by: micheal .N. | September 25, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Now McCain should agree to a debate but change the topic to the economy! Obama’s head will explode since he hasn’t been prepping for that yet.
Posted by: Linda | September 25, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am
Samantha, you discount the value and importance of your own state Senate.
C’mon, you are a worth while State, believe it!
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Aw Jake, your InTheTank slip is showing.
Posted by: PaddyJ | September 25, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Now McCain should agree to a debate but change the topic to the economy! Obama’s head will explode since he hasn’t been prepping for that yet.
————————
Oh dear God please let this happen.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
“For outstanding vision and calm making the right decisions look no further obama/biden08.”
————————————
Yes the always popular … “nu uhhh we suggested it first” is always a very strong Presidential line to use.
Posted by: Clay Matthews | September 25, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
Funny even with his 30 years of Washington leadership, NO ONE wants Joe Biden back there. Gee I wonder why? Perhaps because they know that they last thing they need in DC is windbag Biden in there talking about nothing ad nauseaum.
Posted by: JAZ | September 25, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
looks like Barack just went up 2 in N.C.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Sarah take it to the root time and time again!
The girl has got some SKILLZ!!
Posted by: Ron Jeremy | September 25, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
We know Biden thinks FDR was president during the Depression–and he thought TV had been invented in 1929.
But can he spell potato?
Quayle couldn’t spell–but had much better control of his mouth, and a much smaller ego.
Posted by: harry | September 25, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
“If they tell me I can be helpful, I’ll be there…”
Which is why no one called the lightworker (correction lightweight), until Pres. Bush felt sorry for the empty suit and and invited him for a photo op.
Posted by: Pete | September 25, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
That is about the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. I believe even in universities in Idaho they’ve got books about Federal responsibility vs. State responsibility. Last time I looked only Palin is running something with a surplus while your precious Washington elites (McCain included) are running the federal government into the ground.
Good lord morons the only candidate with any economic success among the four is Palin. She’s also the only one with a concept on energy.
Obama/Biden want no drilling, no nukes, and no coal plants??? That’s certainly a change. A change from 1st world to 3rd.
Palin/Jindal 2012 will save America from OCarter’s 2nd term. America will get the President they deserve.
Posted by: Newagegop | September 25, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
What exactly is wrong with you people?
Posted by: A Stoner | September 25, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Awww off of the McBush supporters are shaking and jealous that SOME people can do more than one thing at a time. Who has missed the MOSt votes in the senate Mr.McCain. What about Ms. Palin, she spent some 80 plus days in her office? Where’s Sarah? Or Where’s John. When the levees broke, where was John? Eating Cake with Bush. I know it’s completely irrational to argue witha blinded conservative but you’re party was incontrol of all of the levers of government for 6 of the past 8 years and control of the congress from 1994-2006 and much of the deregulation took place during that period. Glass/Stegall act McCain economic adviser and possibly in his cabinet Phil.
Posted by: Johnson | September 25, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am
For outstanding vision and calm making the right decisions look no futher obama/biden08.
_________________________________________
From Bill Ayer’s Buddy:
“As I said before, I think that one of the things we have to determine is how we can be most helpful. It’s my sense that the most helpful thing we can do right now is, uh, to let everyone know this is a sufficiently important problem. I can be helpful, and I am prepared to be anywhere, anytime. So, uh, I think the message is, if I can be helpful, I am prepared to be there at any point.”
Well, that explains it! Obama knows the Senate is going to have to actually DO something, as opposed to just TALKING about it. He realizes that’s ABOVE HIS PAY GRADE!
Posted by: tgibson1962 | September 25, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Samantha, you discount the value and importance of your own state Senate.
C’mon, you are a worth while State, believe it!
_____________________________________
Illinois state senate:
Approval rating 43%
Indictments this year 12
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Call if you need me.
Solving the worst economic crisis in US history is Above My Paygrade.
My campaign is more important.
Posted by: cindy in nc | September 25, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am
Dave in lv,
TJB sez:
Worthless Liberal Democrats blocked the legislation that would have brought this whole mess to light if not solved it in 2005.
———————–
Do you find that to be acceptable bi-partisanship?
Samantha has stated her lifestyle and opinions publicly, both have relevance to the discussion.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Right.
And s’pose Sarah shows up…the same “journalist” that posted this tripe would be griping like a stuck pig “What is McCain doing, bringing in Sarah? She isn’t a part of the D.C. establishment yet!! How rude and arrogantly political of McCain!”
Those of us in flyover country aren’t as stupid as you media elites believe. That is why your market shares are decreasing.
Posted by: Bob | September 25, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
Let’s see. The leaders of the Senate committee working on this say up till yesterday, they hadn’t heard one thing from Mr.Save the Nation McCain. Zippo, nada, zilch, zero. He is not a part of the committee hammering it out, will not be a part. At best, he’ll be the Republican point man, hah hah, delivering the legislation for Paulson on what the Senate and Congressional Republicans and Democrats work out.
Obama on the other hand, has not interjected himself in Drama Queen–look at me I can lead–fashion, while from the beginning consulting with all the major players, integrating his understanding of the crisis into his larger program for the American economy, and initiating a joint statement with McCain to calm, rather than rattle, the American populace.
I know there are a lot of identity politics that determines one’s personal take on these candidates, but I swear acting like a chicken with your head cut off, changing your story daily, proposing irrelevant moves–like closing your campaign and avoiding a debate so you can do what? exactly in DC–doesn’t reassure me much. McCain has shown how over the top and inconsistent he will be when we need calm and thoughtful consistency.
Posted by: CitizenE | September 25, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Illinois state senate:
Approval rating 43%
Indictments this year 12
———————————–
See!! They are double digit approval ahead of the feds!! Rejoice!
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
“Palin/Jindal 2012″
————————————
That would be a landslide victory. We’d win 40 States with those two. I’m behind this ticket 200%. But I would change it too Palin/Jindal 2016… Clearly McCain wins in November, then gets beat by Hillary in 2012.
Posted by: Clay Matthews | September 25, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
You’ve said the answer yourself–her office is in Juneau.
So aside from using this non-enquiry to take a swipe at Palin, what’s your point?
Posted by: fireweednectar | September 25, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
Ask any High School student taking a basic civics class for your answer, Slappy.
What a sad state we live in when the people feeding us the news are not even schooled on basic government.
Posted by: Stacy | September 25, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Curious… Is Obama still collecting his Senate Paycheck?
Posted by: Mike | September 25, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am
Many many people here really need to learn how government works. If they did, they would have realized that drinking buddies like GWB were a bad idea, now its blame someone else so we can keep office with an emotionally unstable septuagenarian and an inexperienced gal-next-door.
If you didn’t have people around to point out your self delusions once in a while you would fatally wound yourselves.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
That is a ridiculous question. What governors are in attendance?
Posted by: SH | September 25, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
The main argument in this whole campaign is, alas, taboo:
John McCain with his 72 years is simply way too old for one of the toughest jobs on the planet.
Posted by: mercy | September 25, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Let’s see, the American Taxpayers are paying McCain, Biden, Obama to do their job. I know it’s such a little detail, but really Jake, your distaste for her clouds your thinking. I mean really, after listening to Biden, you really think he is qualified to be a heart beat away from the Presidency. In a moment, I will pick myself up from the floor from laughing so hard I fell off my chair.
Posted by: Irish Gal | September 25, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Jake, in case you havn’t noticed Sarah Palin is not a member of congress nor does she hold any federal office. Where is Joe Biden and Borack Obama?
Posted by: robtr | September 25, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
Uhhh, because she is the sitting Governor of Alaska, not a U.S. Senator?
Better question – Since either the Obama or McCain will be the next President, and will have to spend the next four years living with the results of this poorly crafted, hastily put together P.O.S., why is Obama not trying to help put it together? Agree or disagree, McCain is at least trying to assist.
Posted by: Wil Golden | September 25, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Leonard Peltier – “Many many people here really need to learn how government works.
————————————
Really Leonard??? If you’re agreeing with Tapper’s post I would long and hard about who needs a book on how government works.
Posted by: Clay Matthews | September 25, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
Samantha, you give me hope for America.
Posted by: linda | September 25, 2008, 9:29 am 9:29 am
Hello?! She is a Governor and not a Senator!
Posted by: Jenny C. | September 25, 2008, 9:31 am 9:31 am
Clay,
Gotta respond, I think this article is facetious. but Jake has p*ssed me off at times as well, so roll with it.
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
If Palin went to Washington DC right now she would be just doing Schmidt and Rove sound bites in that librarian tone of voice of hers. If anyone started asking her about the Davis connection to these Wall Street companies then Schmidt will start yelling and calling everyone names again.
Wait she is still getting foreign country experience at the UN?
Posted by: Emily | September 25, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am
She’s a Governor, not a Senator. She holds no federal position. (yet) A better question would be where is Biden? He is a senator and I haven’t heard of any plans for him to return to, you know, do his job.
Posted by: Sarah | September 25, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am
Sounds like a fair question to me, Jake. Truth is, though, the entire Senate and House are not huddled over a bill, so McCain doesn’t need to be there right now. Nor does Obama. My question is why McCain couldn’t let Palin continue to campaign while he runs to DC for his photo op. Why suspend the campaign; can’t she run it? McCain clearly has no confidence in Palin, and her CBS interview makes it painfully obvious why he doesn’t. The McCain-Palin ticket is an embarrassment to the GOP. If, God forbid, the US elects these two, we are a dumber country than I ever imagined.
Posted by: Tim | September 25, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Pay attention folks, this is what an Obama Presidency would be like. Staying uninvolved and disconnected until it’s time to make a speech.
Exactly what happens when you have an inexperienced president.
America can’t afford Obama.
Send him back to Chicago!
Posted by: Jose' | September 25, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Maybe because Palin doesn’t have a vote in this fight. And, she would be the only one there who had nothing…. nothing to do with this meltdown to begin with. The politicos are going to come up with something to cover their butts. Palin doesn’t need to do that. Her presence would be a reminder at how incompetent members of congress really are.
Posted by: ken | September 25, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
hmmm. Governor vs. three senators…
I wonder.
Posted by: Diane | September 25, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Palin’s comment on if congress doesn’t approve the $700 billion bailout package…”Unfortunately, that is the road that America may find itself on.”…. so what’s goin on?
Posted by: flingcom | September 25, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am
Rodney, deregulation is NOT the problem. While certainly fraud and greed had a part to play in this mess, the main problem was government interference with OVER regulation. There is a great article posted on the Investor’s Business Daily (posted Sept 15, 2008). Here is an excerpt:
“But it was the Clinton administration, obsessed with multiculturalism, that dictated where mortgage lenders could lend, and originally helped create the market for the high-risk subprime loans now infecting like a retrovirus the balance sheets of many of Wall Street’s most revered institutions.
“Tough new regulations forced lenders into high-risk areas where they had no choice but to lower lending standards to make the loans that sound business practices had previously guarded against making. It was either that or face stiff government penalties.”
______
The housing market is just like any other market, it is cyclical. When home prices get too expensive, consumers stop buying. This causes prices to fall. And when home prices fall low enough, consumers begin buying again. This causes prices to rise. It is simple Economics 101.
We would already be in an upturn in the housing market if it had not been for the lowering of the lending standards coupled with the pushing of the flexible mortage rates. Instead of the free market being allowed to correct itself, now we had the problem with the value of the homes actually decreasing far below the amount of the mortgage. This resulted in the skyrocketing of the flexible mortgage rate (with fixed mortgage rates the banks would have had to have just ridden out the market). When the mortgage payments doubled and even tripled, many consumers were unable to make their mortgage payments and lost their homes. And in the case of the speculators, many who purchased multiple homes figuring they could make huge profits by flipping the houses, when they could not make their mortgage payments they just walked away. The banks had no alternative but to foreclose on these properties. But since there are no buyers, the banks are stuck with the properties–whose value continues to drop.
Posted by: James Danley | September 25, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Sarah Palin would fix the mess all by herself, and it would be far better than what this committe will do, but John McCain would lose face and Obama would have a heart attack, putting Clueless Joe closer to the Oval Office. So, for the sake of the Republic, executive office experienced Sarah is standing by for questions from the head scratching Congressional people who created the mess.
Posted by: Gary Ogletree | September 25, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
After the election Palin should start naming names and ending the careers of the corrupt members of Congress who took the money and looked the other way when more responsible people like Bush and McCain were pushing Congress for reform and Democrats were all voting no. McCain said at the convention that he is going to name names and make people famous. He should start with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd.
Posted by: Chuck Norton | September 25, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Palin’s interview last like was almost a funny as SNL.
McCain’s campaign manager lots the plot with this one..
He gets exposed for still talking money from Fannie and fredie and comes up with this cr*p..
I thought Id seen everything but this is the most infantile cheap political stunt.
Imagine a McCain Presidency it would make Bush look good!
These two are like dumb and dumber!
I wasn’t sure before but now it all Obama.
Obama looked calm and like our next President!
Posted by: Fmr Undecided | September 25, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
There is no purpose in her taking any hand in the Senate or House negotiations. She is a private citizen. The other 3 candidates are all members of congress. This suggestion that she somehow involve herself in the procedures is off the wall.
Posted by: george abrahams | September 25, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
Palin which one is she DUMB or DUMBER ?
Posted by: LMAO | September 25, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am
She doesn’t know the guys on the Hill, so being a liason now doesn’t seem a fitting role. There’s no pretending she’s a Washington insider or power broker. She doesn’t have any Hill experience, which isn’t to say she doesn’t have the experience she needs to learn the VP job.
She can explain to the American people why this is necessary, but so can the current Administration and the people currently responsible.
All in all, I’d say her job right now is to get McCain elected (that’s the job of all VP candidates), and McCain’s job is to a)look Presidential and b)be a Senator during a crisis.
Posted by: MayBee | September 25, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
And if she went to DC, the article would be about, “Why doesn’t Palin continue campaigning while Mccain goes to DC?”.
Posted by: jim | September 25, 2008, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Of course BOTH Sen. McCain and Sen. Obama should be involved in the decision making. One will be the next President of the United States. And this rescue package will have a major effect on his ability to run the country. So it makes since that they both roll up their sleeves LEAD their respective parties into a bipartisan agreement.
As for Sen. Biden, he is still collecting his paycheck as a senator. So yes, I believe he should be there as well.
Now as for Gov. Palin, it is up to the Congress and the president to hammer out this rescue package. Since she is not a member of Congress, she is not involved in the decision making. So no, she shouldn’t be there.
Posted by: James Danley | September 25, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Jeez, reading the post from these McCain/Bush apologist all I hear is blah blah blah blah blah…..you aren’t even confident in Palin’s abilities. Jake, in answer to your question, “why won’t she go to Washington?” because every time the woman opens her mouth she appears more and more clueless and it’s not the nature of any good little republican lackey to admit being wrong…ahem Iraq, Katrina, Wall Street…..
Posted by: BrooklynGirl | September 25, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
No one is looking for Biden attend? Why should Palin attend? Mccain can make the contribution he wants to with the plan he perscribed… Mccain and Obama.
Posted by: Bob | September 25, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am
Let’s say Palin goes to Washington -what would the media report?
She’s arrogant -thinking she’s been voted in already, thus has no business being there.
Its a transparent ploy to build her economic bona fides.
She’s simply pandering and can’t really do anything.
… and the list goes on. Her presence in Washington isn’t going to make a difference. She can just as easily get her message out from anywhere in the country -without the above “distractions”.
Posted by: John | September 25, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
If Palin went to D.C. she would eventually get cornered and have to speak…….. the Republicans worst nightmare…… can you imagine the nightly news and the visuals of Palin having to answer unscripted questions of substance and policy..
Posted by: Rex | September 25, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am
If you think that the VP nominee who isn’t a sitting federal official should be there, why is the Dem PRESIDENTIAL candidate not going? Think maybe he should be there too?
Posted by: John | September 25, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Wow, the partisan Far Right Fringe smear mongers are here in record numbers attacking Jake.
McCain is done, Palin is not fit for the job, never was and Obama wins, period.
Do you really believe the public is going to continue to buy this crap from the GOP? LMAO
Posted by: Cooter | September 25, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
“”"”"”
But I’m sorry to read from McCain-supporting posters that so few of them seem to have any regard for what Gov. Palin could contribute at such a time! I don’t share your views.
“”"”"”
No matter what Jack the narrative will be negative…
Posted by: EMILY SMITH | September 25, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
How about writing an article on Harry Ried’s statement, “No one knows what to do?”. I am a highly paid LEADER of the SENATE and i don’t have a clue? Or write about Pelosi saying, “Let’s go home, there is nothing we can do.”
Why is it that NO expects our Democratic leadership to do a darn thing, but where Mccain is at least attempting to help, we need to scrutinize his plan before we even give him a chance?
Posted by: Terry | September 25, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Palin, or any candidate who is not actually a Senator or Rep, going to Washington would be pure political pandering.
This is not about encouraging people to vote, this is about rolling up your sleeves and thinking through the issue to come up with ideas that help the bill get passed. It’s a gang-of-14 type moment where ideas and proposals are what is needed to get something passed, not speeches and arm twisting.
Posted by: Vern | September 25, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
“Do you really believe the public is going to continue to buy this crap from the GOP? LMAO”
———————————-
Yes “Cooter” I do.
Posted by: Clay Matthews | September 25, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am
As the governor of Alaska, Palin cannot participate in the high-level federal government deliberations on the economy that McCain gave as his reason for suspending his campaign.
Sorry the author didn’t know that.
Posted by: Henry | September 25, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Barney Frank went on TV to tell the world that he didn’t want either McCain or Obama in the negotiations. This, the man that fought attempts to fix the crisis when it could have been done simply, this the man who told us Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were fine, this the man who’s specific job it is to oversee and prevent such debacles, is now trying to maneuver his party to be the savior as if the fox could fix the hens.
Now you want to stuff Palin in the middle of that and claim she could help, and by implication, say she is too incompetent to do so. Yesterday it was Campbell Brown.
Heck no we don’t agree with you, Jake. DYou don’t get it. Your profession lost its objectivity and as a result, its credibility.
You asked why journalists shouldn’t advocate a few weeks ago. This is why. Because when you get it wrong, you lose your credibility as journalists and we as citizens lose the one thing we really do need in politics: someone to trust. And with these kinds of pieces, you just hammered nails into the lid of the coffin that trust is being buried in.
Posted by: len | September 25, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Obama: wah wah, no fair. I am going to miss study hall.
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Palin knows the economy…
She can see money in her purse!
Posted by: LMAO | September 25, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Palin is NOT IN THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS. SHE IS NOW A GOVERNOR. SHE HAS NO AUTHORITY TO MAKE OR PASS LAWS OR BILLS FOR THE UNITED STATES. CONGRESS NEEDS TO DO THIS R I G H T
N O W.
HOWEVER, BIDEN IS IN THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS. WHY DID YOU NOT ASK IF OR WHY HE IS NOT IN WASHINGTON RIGHT NOW WORKING ON THIS PROBLEM.
THE LIBERAL PRESS IS REALLY DISTORTING THE FACTS AND MAKING THINGS UP ABOUT MCCANN AND PALIN.
Posted by: Edward Henderson | September 25, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
If McCain is the one grandstanding and suspending his campaign, then Palin should be right at his side in DC. I think that all of this is a ploy to postpone the VP debates.
Posted by: 1armywife | September 25, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
This time the ‘conservative’ Republicans are correct.
We just spent a trillion dollars and the lives of 5,000 of our boys and girls on a war that benefits nobody but Wall Street.
If we nationalize anything, make it something that makes sense, like health care.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 25, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
I’m disappointed Jake. I thought you were one of the last “honest” journalists in town.
Sarah is not a US Senator. She can and would play no role in this matter.
You know that.
Posted by: Brenda | September 25, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
“THE LIBERAL PRESS IS REALLY DISTORTING THE FACTS AND MAKING THINGS UP ABOUT MCCANN AND PALIN. DO YOUR DAMN JOB CORRECTLY.”
Who’s McCann??
Posted by: Cooter | September 25, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Palin has no business in Washington trying to fix our economy right now no matter what you say. She is the NOMINEE of the Republicans for vice president.
But where are Obama and Biden? It is their duty to be in Congress RIGHT NOW. Why have you not written about that instead of attacking Palin for no sensible reason.
Posted by: Inlovewithtruth | September 25, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
I can just see Donna Brazille spitting out her grits over this latest Obama drama. The Obamabots are gathering on Kool Aid Mountain to decide what to do.
Posted by: Samantha | September 25, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Sarah can’t be trusted to campaign on her own, especially after yesterday. She’s a lightweight and people are starting to see it. Just wait until the witness tampering in Alaska investigation gets rolling. She may not even be on the ballot in November…somewhere there’s a fork about to be stuck.
Posted by: Brian | September 25, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
I feel sorry for anyone who can still support McShame. It does prove that there are still sheep in this world.
Oks it ok good little sheep your party may just one day be able to do something right, since it sure has not been within the last 8 years and if McShame and moosehunter get into office it wont get any better for another 4 to 8 years.
Posted by: nathan | September 25, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Jake I think it would be beneficial for Palin to go.
I have every confidence in Palin–they need to let her answer questions. So many in the media have only one objective–to embarrass her.
But she can handle it.
She cannot possibly be worse than 35 year insider and ding dong Biden.
Posted by: riley | September 25, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Jake
Everything you posted in your update as to what Palin could do is also true for both Obama and Biden. Yet you attack Palin but fail to do so for the Dems. Your views are clearly one sided.
While JM is actually trying to do exactly what you are stating, Obama and Biden are staying away, staying on the campaign trail awaiting for Reid to call upon them IF they could be “helpful”.
Don’t you see the irony? Reid and other Dems don’t think Obama can be “helpful” in solving our worst economic problem since 1929. They are saying either Obama would make things worse or is completely usesless in helping to forge a coalition.
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
This is the time for Palin to step forward in front of America and the media and talk about these issues in a thoughtful matter and answer the questions on the Voters mind via the mainstream media which would reach the majority of Americans.
Posted by: katherine | September 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
To those that keep repeating that Gov Palin isn’t in the Senate… on that same note, McCain isn’t on the Banking or Finance Committee, so what exactly, other than cheer-leading, can McCain do?
By injecting Presidential Politics into this, McCain himself is getting in the way, of what has thus far been bipartisan negotiations.
Posted by: jon | September 25, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am
Jake asks a sensible question, and the “you’re hating Sarah” crowd hollers. If she can’t take the heat, she should stay out West.
Posted by: Eugene | September 25, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
The SENATORS on the tops of the tickets need to be involved in this — one of them will inherit this mess come next January, so the idea that they should stay out of it, and just come back to vote if the vote is close, as Obama earlier suggested, is ridiculous. And now it appears, as per CBS News, that Henry Paulson asked McCain advisors to ask McCain to step in, to pull recalcitrant Republican congresspeople into the fold in support of the legislation being developed. So it makes perfect sense for the two presidential candidates, who are after all both sitting senators, to return to Washington and be part of the face-to-face give-and-take.
The two vps are not needed, however. Let them carry on with the campaign. I say this even though Biden is also a sitting senator. If he should return to participate in the effort in Washington, that’s fine (so long as he keeps his mouth shut and does not place FDR in front of a television camera as president in 1929 or a White House representative in talks in Tehran, as he’s done in recent days). However, I think the two VP candidates can best serve by carrying on their respective campaigns.
You know good and well that anything Sarah Palin could contribute at this point, she could do from anywhere in America, Jake. She does not need to travel to Washington in order to reassure the american people or even reluctant conservative congressmen. You simply want to snark about her, as you seem increasingly want to do.
Posted by: moderate | September 25, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
“As the governor of Alaska, Palin cannot participate in the high-level federal government deliberations on the economy that McCain gave as his reason for suspending his campaign.
Sorry the author didn’t know that.”
Oh, listen to ‘em squeal!
Palin has been to Washington a dozen times in her brief tenure as govenor to lobby for handouts.
Anyone can lobby Congress.
It’s McCain who claims the deal can’t get done without him. Of course, he’s really trying to stop Obama from edging further ahead in the polls.
Jake is right: here was a perfect opportunity for Palin to show how she could work effectively with Congress.
Remember, Cheney claims the VP is actually part of the legislative branch, not the executive.
McCain–hiding from debate.
Palin–hiding from everybody.
Posted by: Lou | September 25, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
The reason Palin is not in D.C. to help with the so-called bailout bill is found in a simple civics lesson… She the Governor of Alaska not a member of Congress. By the way, where’s Biden?
Posted by: Mike H | September 25, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Maybe I’m not grasping everything you’re getting at, but McCain has not exactly endorsed the bailout (I think that’s the current stand…I get dizzy keeping track of where he and Obama stand on this issue). So why would Palin be used to lobby conservatives for a bailout that McCain doesn’t support…at least in its current form?
I do see your point. Just not sure I agree on this one. Palin can always conference in if she has something to add. For that matter, McCain and Obama could conference in and do not HAVE to be in Washington. The whole idea of going is more symbolic, and perhaps showmanship, than anything else.
Posted by: P | September 25, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Jake Tapper,
Don’t worry about the propagandists, and keep the information flowing!
McCain is playing politics with the economic crisis.
The Republicans haven’t cared about running our government for years so now they REALLY need to LOOK like they care.
Remember:
The media is only as liberal as the giant corporations that own it.
Democrats get my vote. I decided this years ago.
Posted by: ApostasyUSA | September 25, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Typical lemming, they can’t think for themselves, yet have the audicity to claim other people don’t think.
Do you read? Where are the facts suuporting any claim you have ever made.
this is what seperates us from you.
We will and do provide proof, citiation, quotes, and facts.
You porivde rhetoric and oh-so-easily disproved lies.
It is quite pathetic.
The New YOrk times thing….so transparently hypocritical of you.
Debate postponment? Didn’t McCain say the economy was in great shape?
What a clown show. YOu people do not eve have the intelligence to debate, so you lie and distract.
Posted by: Ummmmm | September 25, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Stop with this silly garbage, about the Media trying to destroy Palin.
She destroys herself, every time anyone asks her a substantive question.
It’s absolutely amazing, how many deluded ignorant people are out there.
Maybe a housewife from Alaska, with no understanding of issues, works for the people of Alaska, but, this is about the Real President & VP of America… not about a part on West Wing.
Posted by: jon | September 25, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Mike H writes:
“The reason Palin is not in D.C. to help with the so-called bailout bill is found in a simple civics lesson… She the Governor of Alaska not a member of Congress. By the way, where’s Biden?”
It’s McCain’s attempt to play a joker about his importance, not Obama’s or Biden’s.
Biden, by the way, is out there answering questions like every other political candidate in the history of the U.S.–except Hidin’ Palin.
Posted by: Lou | September 25, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
McCain–hiding from debate
Palin–hiding from everybody
Propagandits–licking their self-inflicted wounds
Posted by: LOL | September 25, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
“Palin could work with them, lobby them, be a liaison to them from the McCain campaign”
Am I to understand that Senators and House members (Dodd, Kerry, Obama, Rangel, Franks, Clinton) are clueless about the mess they created when they systematically looted the American people through their Freddie/Fannie mortgage fraud?
Are you saying these fine examples of public service need Gov Palin to help bail them out of their own mess?
Posted by: syn | September 25, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
“It wonder what is feels like to be so dumb that you support Palin?”
———————————-
About as dumb as to blindly follow the most inexperienced presidential candidate in the history of the U.S… Barack Obama
Posted by: Clay Matthews | September 25, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Typical Media inside the beltway approach. She is a governor and not a member of Congress. Why not ask the other 49 or is it 57 governors to assist? And, where is good ol Joe Biden on his leadership in the Senate to get this done. Obama wants to do JFK and rest in FLorida for the debate instead of showing some leadership. It took the current unpopular president to drag his butt back to DC to do what an elected senator is supposed to be doing.
We have truly witnessed some amazing things in this race including the death of the main stream media.
Posted by: Jim M | September 25, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
I love the hypocrisy — we’re sexist if we treat her differently from the men, but we’re sexist if we subject her to the same criticism as the men get. She’s a strong Alaskan deer-huntin’ woman who needs to be kept behind glass because she’s such a delicate lady. Get over it people. She’s nothing more than the McCain political arm candy. Potential VP? You gotta be kidding.
The republicans will lose, but I’m amazed it’s still this close. If Obama were white, this election would already be over.
Posted by: yeesh | September 25, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Obama writes his own speeches.
McCain is handled and uses index cards.
Palin is handled and uses a teleprompter
You people are soooooooooo dumb its like arguing with a 5 year old.
I give up, no inteeligent debate from Republican going on anymore, they have all defected to Obama.
Posted by: LOL | September 25, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Very thoughtful article. McCain does not support his own call to quit the campaign and bring Palin because Bush does not want Palin involved – he does not trust her. Bush/Cheney concocted the debate excuse for McCain. Anything to prevent the candidates discussing real issues in front of voters. McCain already prevents Palin from opening her mouth in public. By the time congress is on the fifth $700B giveaway to for-profit corporations, no one will be paying attention because American voters are that dumb.
Posted by: jrock | September 25, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
@Clay, that was your comeback???
Experience? What a ridiculous claim by the GOP.
Posted by: LOL | September 25, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Palin should be there. Maybe she can learn something.
Posted by: d | September 25, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
If the “anyone can lobby Congress, so why isn’t Palin here?” crowd actually believe what they are saying, why isn’t Michelle Obama lobbying Congress for a resolution?
After all , she is Barrack’s number one advisor. What better way for them to unite the country and show their bipartisan support?
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Where is Joe Biden, a sitting senator, in all this? Are you going to ask him to also come back and help?
For that matter, what about Obama? He had to be dragged back to washington kicking and screaming. He said yesterday that he was available if needed.
Why isn’t he coming back on his own to help?
Aren’t you guilty of, at best, some inconsistency here if not a double standard?
Posted by: TS | September 25, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Lindsey Graham told CNN that the McCain campaign was trying to negotiate it so that, instead of debating Friday, Obama and McCain debate when the Biden/Palin debate was supposed to take place and that Palin’s debate would therefore have to be postponed indefinitely.
Hmm. Things are starting to make sense.
But, hey, since she “has that readiness,” as she keeps reminding us, why not have Palin and Biden debate Friday while Obama and McCain do their photo ops in DC and then Obama/McCain can take the VP slot fot their debate? Problem solved.
Posted by: S.L. | September 25, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Obama is so much more qualified than McCain…and …last I checked, he beat qualified candidates in a democratic process to become the nominee. Palin is a hand picked know-nothing do-nothing liar.
As if number of years = better decisions.
Proof against your argument? George Bush.
Google seem well run by young guys
How much expereince does the head of AIG have?
Patheric and empty Republican talking point….experience…LOL
How about integrity – advantage Obama
How about honesty – huge advantage Obama
Posted by: LOL | September 25, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
You wrote this just to be provocative– right???? Can you imagine the media’s outrage if Palin showed up????
The entire focus of the reporting would be on whether it was appropriate for her to be there or not. The public would get EVEN LESS INFORMATION from the third estate.
Posted by: Suzy | September 25, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Point taken Jake, and a good point. I did not pick that idea up in the original post.
I expect that she is not there for many good reasons
1 Not a currently sitting senator or rep
2 Calculated so as to not inject politics into the bill writing (could someone guarantee that Senator Frank or others would not start a cat fight over her presence, based on their reaction to McCain returning.
3 Take away an obvious whine from the NY Times and the Obama camp (remember the recent UN protest from which Obama had her dis-invited?)
4 and of course, for the children around here, she needs to do her nails
This all appears to be thought through. There is something about not being done Monday that keeps appearing in our leaders comments that is very ominous. Less fight and more action may be more necessary than we know.
Posted by: smith | September 25, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Governor Palin is not “just” the Governor of Alaska. Governors of Alaska do not meet with foreign leaders at the UN, nor are they briefed on National Security from the Bush administration’s Office of the Director of National Intelligence (which a campaign spokesperson said was standard procedure for all presidential and vice presidential candidates.) Going to DC to help shape the GOP strategy and response to this crisis is in line with her current duties. If she believes it is inappropriate for her to be in DC, perhaps she should head back to Alaska, now that the campaign has been suspended.
Posted by: KS | September 25, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
Dave in Iv wrote:
If the “anyone can lobby Congress, so why isn’t Palin here?” crowd actually believe what they are saying, why isn’t Michelle Obama lobbying Congress for a resolution?
—————————–
ANSWER: Uh, perhaps cuz Michelle is not running for VICE PRESDIENT (Palin is). I’ll break it down further, Michelle IS NOT AN ELECTED OFFICIAL (Palin is).
Duh
Posted by: Kate | September 25, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
One could just as easily turn this on it’s head and as why Joe Biden isn’t there helping gain support for the bill? He is a senator, for goodness sake…
While I don’t disagree that Palin could be helping sell the idea of a rescue bill to the public…
1) Her presence or speaking about a bill that is still to be shaped might be construed as politicizing the issue. And McMav has said the issue transcends politisization.
2) She holds little sway with Democratic politicians nad has ledd gravitas than McCain-who will already be there-has with Republicans.
3) House Democrats, such as Barney Frank-curiously one of the perpetrators of the non-regulation of Fannie/Freddie that they now decry-are already rtying to portray McCains decision to come to Washington and work on the bill as a mere campaign stunt and photo op…What do you think those disingenuous dirtbags would be saying if Palin came to town???
In large part, the Democrats in congress have wrought the current situation, by blocking any reform or oversight of Fannie/Freddie, which are at the root of the current meltdoen, for more than 10 years. Their hypocrisy in trying to lay this at the feet of Bush is astounding. And, their attempts to use it against McCain are equally hypocritical considering he sponsored a regulatory reform amendment in 2005; but what else is new-treachery, demagoguery, deciet, and misrepresentation of other peoples positions have been the Democrat’s, and their accomplices in the MSM’s, stock in trade for the last 15 years.
Make no mistake that their current Kabuki drama will come back to haunt them; it’s just a question of when…
Posted by: Bob Reed | September 25, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Jake and all,
Sarah Palin is available if she’s needed- just give her a call a la Obama. He’s busy on a beach in Florida, after his civics lesson to the nation about how a President should be able to manage more than one crisis’ at a time. Nice try Obama! I did not realize that preparing for a debate on Foreign policy in sunny Florida while there is an actual crisis with our economy qualified as managing multiple ‘crisis’.” People, say what you will about Palin, you may even be right, but don’t allow your view of her to cloud your view of Obama. He is epitome of what this counry has become- Wussified.
Posted by: Pat | September 25, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
“Palin should be there. Maybe she can learn something.”
If you mean the proper way to loot the American people though Freddie-Fannie mortgage fraud to pay for ACORN voter fraud, to finance Chicago’s slum development, to enrichen Obama’s campaign finance director Penny Prizker, to get money for Raines to donate back to the corrupt Democratic politican campaigns, to donate 41 million to Rev Rainbow Coalition?
No thanks Gov Palin is a Reformer; she doesn’t do fraud, she fights it.
Posted by: syn | September 25, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
“Obama is so much more qualified than McCain”
Based on….
His work for ACORN?
His lack of efforts at regulation of GSE’s?
Continuing to use Jim Johnson as an advisor?
His lack of accomplishment?
His voting “present” 129 times?
His using Penny Pritzker, the Queen of sub-prime mortgages, as his National Finance Chairman?
Great reasons.
Posted by: drjohn | September 25, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
“How about integrity – advantage Obama”
ROTFL! You must have missed your calling as a comedian.
Posted by: Aubrey | September 25, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
If she followed your advice, she would be nailed for overstepping her bounds. She’d be called arrogant. And where are the inquiries as to Joe Biden’s whereabouts?
Btw, I appreciate your reporting. I may not always agree, but you’re generally very fair and objective. Thank you.
Posted by: KySlugBug | September 25, 2008, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Memo to Jake Tapper, ABC News, and the Media at large:
John McCain = Senator. He works out of an office in Washington DC. He proposes, debates, and votes on legislation in Washington. It’s his job.
Barack Obama = Senator. He works out of an office in Washington DC. He proposes, debates, and votes on legislation in Washington. It’s his job.
Sarah Palin = Governor of Alaska. She is the chief officer of the executive branch of a state located thousands of miles away from Washington DC. Her job is to work with the state legislature and to oversee the executive agencies of the state government. She has no constitutional role in national legislative affairs.
That’s why McCain and Obama need to be in Washington right now working on the bailout. That’s why Sarah Palin doesn’t.
Posted by: t.ferg | September 25, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
For those who believe Obama writes all of his own speeches, why is he then speechless and incoherent without a teleprompter?
Why would he need to bring teleprompters to town hall meetings with his own fans?
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Obama laid out a very reasonable position on the “bailout” (giveaway), too bad its not going to happen. First of all, although you wouldn’t know it from reading the media, Paulson disagrees with every single point.
Secondly, the way this game is played is that the pols who actually care about the people (mostly the most liberal members of congress, with maybe Shelby joining them) will lay out a plan that makes total sense. Then, Wall Street is going to run to the DINOs and tell them that they are the reasonable ones and they need to stop the proposals that aren’t the most beneficial to their greedy little interests.
Reid and Palosi are going to be inclined to back the better proposals but will be stymied by the DINOs. Then, a campaign to force something to be passed immediately will be pressed full force and the worst proposal will be brought forward. Reid and Palosi will back down, introduce it with minor changes they will call victories.
That is the most likely scenario. Only the backbone of the real Democrats is capable of stopping it, but they only have a handful of people.
Posted by: Mike | September 25, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
I don’t believe anything McCain says now or then. The story about him telling his captors he didn’t want to go home unless others went home doesn’t make sense. As a 23 year vet, your enemy didn’t say to you, “you can go home because you daddy is a big wig in the military.” If anything, it was more reason to keep him for interrogation. The story is full of holes and all we have is McCain’s word that it happen.
It is unfortunate McCain was a POW, but McCain is an opportunist then as he is now. A man of any integrity does not approve such low blow campaign ads, distort the truth, and out and out lie as he has in this campaign. I don’t care if you feel Obama has done the same. As a military man, we still maintain our integrity no matter how dishonest the enemy is. McCain’s campaign character does not reflect the integrity of a true hero.
I want proof from McCain that someone in the enemy camp said he could go home. McCain, do you really expect veterans, like me, believe that? When in history has the enemy told a captive he could go home? You have proven your word means nothing now and I suspect you took the opportunity to distort your story then for political purposes, as you seem to be doing now. Country first, if it advantages McCain, is your true motto.
Posted by: steve | September 25, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
On your trips around the hill today ask, “What is so signifigant about being done by Monday?”
Posted by: smith | September 25, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am
“@Clay, that was your comeback???
Experience? What a ridiculous claim by the GOP.
———————————-
I actually don’t think Palin experienced at all and I can’t stand any of the 4 candidates.
Backers of both sides needs to take a good hard look at themselves and realized who is really getting screwed over. Calling people dumb for backing a candidate when quite clearly the same argument can be used on the other candidate is astonishingly sophomoric.
And please don’t associate me with the GOP again.
Posted by: Clay Matthews | September 25, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
“to donate 41 million to Rev Rainbow Coalition?”
Pardon me, I have a correction to make:
it’s “$1 million to Rev Rainbow Coalition?”
Posted by: syn | September 25, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Not a single serious or informed post here answering the question in the article.
“Why Isn’t Palin Coming to Washington to Work on the Bailout Bill?”
“shes a governor” or “liberal media” are not valid (or factual) answers.
Posted by: Rick | September 25, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
No thanks Gov Palin is a Reformer; she doesn’t do fraud, she fights it.
Posted by: syn | Sep 25, 2008 10:54:19 AM
Ok, just keep telling yourself that. Maybe if she gave more interviews we would find out more about her views and opinions. Hiding out is not a good sign.
Posted by: d | September 25, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
@syn, shouldn’t he report on the Republican fraud too?
Or does that automatically make it “liberal media” if he discusses any Republican hypocrisy?
Posted by: Rick | September 25, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
We like to discuss actual facts here.
Do you have any to offer?
————————————
King P
I offered them in the beginning when I said she should NOT be in Washington today… Tb Those are facts. Fed vs. State. Learn how they work.
Posted by: Clay Matthews | September 25, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
@syn, keep drinking that koolaid.
Palin accepted earmarks as Governoor for the bridge to nowhere.
She got earmakrs as MAYOR..in DC……..yet she can’t help with the bailout….in DC
Posted by: Rick | September 25, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
LOL @ LOL
Open mouth, insert foot. Ask Obama who Jon Favreau and his team are. The only things he doesn’t read straight from their speeches are the um’s and uh’s. Those are his own intellectually challenged insertions.
Posted by: Emm | September 25, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am
She’s running for VP, she should at least be answering questions.
Posted by: ... | September 25, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Bush throughout most of
this year said the economy
was in good shape. Now
he has declared it’s in
danger.
When he was giving us an
optimistic assessment, his
Republican appointees
in charge allowed crooked
and evil Wall Street firms
to slowly choke the life
out of the economy.
Posted by: anon | September 25, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
McCain’s political stunt has already backfired. He has been forced to save his money and use the free media he gets from the fawning presss. All this is doing is calling more attention to whats going on with the bill, which works to the disadvantage of the Republicans, who are used to being able to get their crap passed because nobody is paying attention. As people find out whats really going on, the Democratic proposals are going to gain more traction, and McCain is going to look like a fool again.
Posted by: Flash Override | September 25, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am
re:Post by: King, PA | Sep 25, 2008 10:55:25 AM
Why haven’t we heard of any “facts” from any Dem as to why they don’t believe Obama would actually be “helpful” in solving this problem?
How about the fact Obama has not had any experience in bringing bipartisan solutions or working in a bipartisan manner?
How about the fact Obama has yet to propose any plan but does well in attacking the plans others have?
Any other facts as to why Reid wants him to stay away?
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Look, for all you clueless partisans who just don’t seem to grasp how our government functions: McCain and Obama are involved in this process as *senators* and leaders of their party in congress. If Gov. Palin were to be injected into this process it could only be construed as pure political involvement, and potentially a transgression of the division of powers laid out in the constitution.
Posted by: oleg | September 25, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
All candidiates have speechwriters, but it is well known that Obama gets much more involved in the contents of his speeches and does write many parts to them.
McCain and Palin write NOTHING.
Posted by: King, PA | September 25, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Well, if he can’t bring Palin, maybe he can bring the former co-chair of his campaign, Phil Gramm, who called our economic crisis a “mental recession.” Gramm was also the one who shoved the Commodity Futures Modernization Act down the throat of Congress in December, 2000 – which led the way for the credit default swaps that helped destroy the economy. This meltdown is his baby. And I haven’t heard much about him this week. How about an interview with Phil Gramm, McCain’s top economic advisor????
Posted by: mara | September 25, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Why would McCain be concerned about how it would “appear” if Palin were to help him?
I thought he was a “maverick.”
Besides, the VP is the head of the Senate. Why not a little on the job training for the potential VP?
Posted by: Danny | September 25, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
I have to wonder. Had Mrs. Palin gone to D.C. with McCain, and inserted herself into this…..would you be scorning her for doing that? She’s damned if she does, and damned if she doesn’t.
The mainstream media has made it abundantly clear where they stand, who they’re voting for, and who they are supporting. It’s a joke to say otherwise.
By the same turn…why don’t we ask…why was Obama not going to return to do his job, and said…if you need me, call me. Because like the kid who took the cookie without asking mommy first…he was hiding. He knows he’s complicit in this mess as well, and wants to stay as far away as he can. Well he’s been called to the wood shed now. Hasn’t he? Yet you don’t ask why he didn’t want to return, and face this mess head on?
While I’m at it. Since you all seem to be so eager to dole out half your incomes to taxes, to help keep on the skids, those already there….why not just give it up now, and give it to them?
Posted by: Jeanie | September 25, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
The McCain campaign has told all you msm types what Palin is to their campaign: a face. That’s all, just a baloon headed face. No way has she demonstrated any track record from which to form an opinion in any debate. Why I’m sure that left alone to come up with a thoughtful response to a considered question from a rewpected interviewer, she would be left with only wne response and that is yada yada yada McCain. does John McCain think we’re stupid enough to buy that line? Yes.
Posted by: whenwillthisnightmareend | September 25, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
The answers to the question Tapper poses are that the McCain camp:
1) is making this up as they go along. The whole “McCain rides in on a white horse” thing is a transparent seat-of-the-pants political ploy. They haven’t really thought this out fully, or at least most of their energy is going to the PR effort and not to the actual lobbying.
2) McCain is still testing the waters to see if it will be to his political benefit to vote against the measure.
Posted by: Tungsten | September 25, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Oh I see I was in error about the deletion, my apology Jake.
At least I am honest when I am in error and have the ability to acknowledge such errors.
Oh and the person decrying Palin’s Bridge to Nowhere! perhaps Jake could inform his readers about that situation, it appears they need help.
Posted by: syn | September 25, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Um… please explain this AP lead.
“A grainy video surfaced Wednesday showing Sarah Palin being blessed in her hometown church three years ago by a Kenyan pastor who prayed for her protection from “witchcraft” as she prepared to seek higher office.”
Posted by: kravitz | September 25, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Both McCain and Palin after
they both lose would be
invited to Washington to
work on a Bailout Plan to
Nowhere.
Posted by: anon | September 25, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
<>
Actually – ‘She’s a Governor’ is a very valid & factual answer. She was not elected to congress and it is congress’ job to work on this bill.
This is just another attempt by a lame liberal media to question Palin’s credentials.
McCain, Obama & Biden are all Senators and therefore it is their responsibility ( read: JOB ) to be in Washington working on fixing this problem.
Palin, being a State Governor, has no policy-making role in this. As to the point that she could be lobbying, etc… sometimes leaders need to recognize when it’s best to step back and let those whose job it is, work.
This is not Palin’s responsibility – yet. So try and cover a real news story instead of ONCE AGAIN – sniping from the shadows.
( Hey, let’s get ALL the Governors to go to Washington to help out – maybe Mayors too – maybe State legislature politicians – or MAYBE we can just get all the country’s community organizers in there too.. )
Posted by: John | September 25, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Jake – you called it right. Doesn’t matter how McCain’s team or supporters want to spin this — you are exactly right.
But Jake, she couldn’t help any because she knows nothing. Not sure if you saw her interview on Katie Couric yesterday but that alone explains why McCain felt the need to lie to Letterman and run over to do an interview with Katie Couric do do clean up yesterday.
Posted by: dotheresearch | September 25, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Quote:
Look, for all you clueless partisans who just don’t seem to grasp how our government functions: McCain and Obama are involved in this process as *senators* and leaders of their party in congress. If Gov. Palin were to be injected into this process it could only be construed as pure political involvement, and potentially a transgression of the division of powers laid out in the constitution. Nothing to see here except another clueless journalistic hack. Move along.
==================
Yep.
Posted by: MJS | September 25, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Just who do you think that you are fooling? It isnt that you think that she has something to offer, it’s just you in a backhanded way trying to slam Palin. It’s slick but that kind of crap doesn’t work anymore.
Posted by: dan | September 25, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
“Palin is a dip and also made women in Wasilla pay for their own rape exams while mayor also, how pathetic was that??”
Daily Kos or HuffPo reader – which are you?
Truth is that the Police Chief, after reviewing records, found NO RECORDS of any victims being billed for rape kits.
Try and keep up with the actual news – not just what your being spoon fed by the liberal hacks.
Posted by: John | September 25, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
It would not matter to MSM if Palin walked on water. The woman can do nothing right according to the media. I agree with the poster that said she would be critized to the hilt if she were up on the “Hill”
Where is the criticism of Biden (The intellectual that thinks FDR was on t.v. in 1929)? Maybe Joe is in remedial history classes.
Posted by: gail | September 25, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am
The more important question would be “Why wasn’t Obama willing to come back to Washington, but only to ‘be there if needed’?
Good Lord – a major economic crisis and the body he was appointed to is supposed to be working hard to fix it – but he wants to just ‘phone it in’?
Can you vote ‘present’ over the phone – kind of an oxymoron…..
Posted by: John | September 25, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am
Palin is a governor. She’s not involved in House / Senate issues.
Uneducated voters are the scourge of our Republic, and you sir, are one of them.
Posted by: Billy | September 25, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am
She’s not a member of Congress. Plain and simple.
Posted by: SteveIL | September 25, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Sigh… Jake. Reaching my brother.
Now if she were a lobbyist from Countrywide, she would be there. I see from the slush fund they’ve thrown in (they never friggin’ learn), for ACORN and others (who were the first to cry racist, give folks who can’t afford it a home… and force the banks to lower standards you congress you), just like they threw money for these law breaking, criminal groups in the 300B Homeowners Rescue bill last July.
Um J, when are you going to report the 18 times legislation has been turned down along dem party lines since 2001?
You do know THOMAS. I’m sure you know CREW and Open Secrets as well… let’s see who’s stuffing their pockets while trying to convince us idiot taxpayers they work for us. They should be in jail.
Posted by: candy | September 25, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
rvstar: this crisis does not belong to barney frank – that is a bunch of baloney. it belongs to phil gramm – who was paid by the banking industry, is still paid by the banking industry and who not only gave john mccain insanely stupid advice – he paved the way for the meltdown on wall street through his 2000 “moderization bill” – not to mention his 1999 deregulation bill. yes – both candidates have accepted money from people who work on wall street – and both candidates have ties to the banking industry. but barack obama’s campaign was not co-chaired by a phil gramm, the man who wrote the bill which allowed the credit default swaps which are at the center of this crisis – a bill that allowed for no regulation. obama’s campaign was not co-chaired by a man who called the economic crisis “mental.”
if you want to quote somebody – try the lines of desperation the mccain campaign has been throwing out the past two weeks. pick a day – they change by the hour. my own personal favorite is sarah palin on cbs:
COURIC: I’m just going to ask you one more time, not to belabor the point. Specific examples in his 26 years of pushing for more regulation?
PALIN: I’ll try to find you some and I’ll bring them to you.
Good luck with that one, Sarah.
Another favorite is John McCain in March, to the Wall Street Journal “I’m always for less regulation.” Or John McCain on the day the crisis really hit the fan: “The economy is fundamentally sound.” Now John is flying to DC in his personal family jet for a photo-op to celebrate regulation and corporate welfare, I guess the economy is sound if your wife is a multi-millionaire and you can’t remember how many houses you own.
Posted by: mara | September 25, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Her job at the moment is a governor, not a senator. At this point Senators Obama, Biden and McCain are being paid by the American taxpayer to go to work for us as our elected represenatives and solve this issue. It is their job to take care of this matter. Now Senators Obama and McCain are going to washington to take care of this. Senator Biden is not. Shouldn’t the issue be to the people of Delaware that elected him and are paying him to represent them are now left holding the bag? This is just another attempt by the media to put Governor Palin in a bad light.
Posted by: Denise Adolphi | September 25, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
This question does not need to be asked.
What if they as her question?
Posted by: SP | September 25, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
John,
Why didn’t McCain make a point of showing bi-partisan soldiarity by encouraging Obama to go with him rather than hanging up the phone and grabbing publicity?
How is that going to help anything when he goes back to D.C. other than be a whip for his own party?
What does that have to do with the political situation on the Democratic side of the aisle?
Do the issues matter or justthe appearances?
Posted by: Leonard Peltier | September 25, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
How about why Sen. Obama is not in Washington doing the exact same things you say Gov. Palin should do? You mentioned Sen. Biden, but how about the supposed leader on that ticket? Saying “Call me if I can be of any help” does not show leadership abilities in my opinion.
Posted by: JeffinSac | September 25, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
The smell of desperation emanating from the McCain / Palin campaign and by extension conservatives is overwhelming. McCain should start his effort to help by apologizing for his unwavering knee j erk support of deregulation and for turning his campaign over to sleazy lobbyists and consultants like Rick “I’m selling access to the future president” Davis.
Posted by: Ed | September 25, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Palin is not a senator
Posted by: JS | September 25, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
This is an issue for the *current* Congress and *current* President…of which Gov. Palin in neither.
Here’s an idea: Wouldn’t it be fun to try to be unbiased?
Posted by: geah | September 25, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
McCain was a star player in creating the problem. Now he offers himself as the solution. That’s chutzpah to the point of delusion.
Posted by: Ed | September 25, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am
JS you beat me to the comment.
Conservatives do not want this anyhow, it is a prelude to Socialism!!
Posted by: spock | September 25, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
I’d think Palin could benefit from observing how legislation works, if nothing else.
As to Biden not rushing back – perhaps he and Barack know how things are going and can trust those to whom responsibility has been delegated to do their jobs.
Posted by: Anne in TN | September 25, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Honestly, Jake, a post like this reeks of desperation for dirt. She’s not a member of Congress or the Administration.
Besides, Harry Reid say he didn’t want McCain — a Senator — working on it for fear it would politicize the negotiations. And you’re suggesting he respond by bringing his VP candidate with him?
Lame, Jake. Very lame.
Posted by: Heywood U. Reedmore | September 25, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Remember when Republicans and Democrats used to just run against each other?
Now it’s Republicans vs. Democrats/Media/Hollywood/U.N./Despot Thugs/Astroturf PR machines
*sigh* I miss the good old days.
Posted by: Giveme Abreak | September 25, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
For everyone asking, “Why hasn’t Obama been questioned on this or that”
Obviously the conservative right does not watch interviews with Obama, read articles about Obama, research much of anything about Obama. If they did then they would know where and how Obama plans to fix the economy.
I read all I can about McCain and Palin, I want to know where they stand on the issues that matter to the economic future of this country. I don’t really care if the conservative right doesn’t want to learn about Obama, luckily there are more people who care about the issues and who are going to vot Obama than not.
3 weeks ago Obama was hammering the campaign trail about what he was going to do about the declining economy. Guess what folks, his ‘hammering’ is paying dividends now. Obama has consistantly stayed above the fray, and it shows. The minor pimple in polls the republicans got from selecting Palin is gone.
She clearly cannot open her mouth and say much of anything with any substance in it. I hear things like She has heart! and She’s a fighter!
Well maybe so, but she knows nothing about presiding over the Congress [which would be one of her duties as VP in case you didn't know] And has no clue about foreign policy.
Sorry GOPers, this year is ripe for a democrat to take office.
Posted by: Jason | September 25, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Wow McCain has his people on overtime on these boards. Too bad the numbers of comments are way out of whack with the polling on this issue. Let’s face it, this is no more serious than it was Tuesday, and McCain was campaigning then. The entire thing is a political ploy, and if the conservatives don’t back some sort of bailout, it will also be a ploy to give themselves and McCain cover. This is a Republican created mess. However, we should not be surprised that Republicans are more interested in trying to hold on to power than in trying to fix it. They are even willing to plunge us into a depression if it means they don’t have to find new jobs.
Posted by: Dee Dee Lynn | September 25, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Jake, why don’t you get the problem. Republicans are the issue. Bush pleaded to McCain to help him get support from house republicans. The democrats have a plan that they have put forth and Bush/Paulson have agreed to their demand. The issue is the repiblicans. Mccain meanwhile has not even read the original 3-page Paulson plan let alone the new plan.
Posted by: Rebecca | September 25, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
McCain “The fundamentals of our econony are strong”
What an idiot.
Oh, wait, he meant the people?
The people were just as “strong” during the Great Depression. The “people” have nothing to do with the economy, stupid.
Posted by: ... | September 25, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Posted by: The Undisputed Truth
“Wrong Ed, you are a liar.
Keep flailing.”
McCain was a star player in creating the problem.”
Um, sorry, but McCain did NOTHING in his 26 years to increase regulation.
The makes him part of the problem.
Prove me wrong, you are the liar.
Give a single example of how John McCain showed leadership in Congress by proposing increases to legislation.
You can’t….keep failing.
Posted by: ... | September 25, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Palin is a Governor, not a senator and therefore can not vote or sit in on closed door meetings. It would be pointless for her to go.
Posted by: Mick | September 25, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
In Bill Clinton’s interview today he blames Democrats, “they fought against me when I wanted to reform Freddie and Fannie”
Bill speaks the truth!
He also said Obama was already offered 10 debates from McCain and Obama declined.
Go Bill!
McCain 2008
Hillary 2012
Posted by: Meredith | September 25, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
…: “the people have nothing to do with the economy”, how dumb can you get. If there were no working people there would be no economy. The economy is built on workers, entrepreneurs, and the goods they create/sell. They are the backbone of the economy. Also if you still don’t believe workers are the main part of the economy… why did the economy grow so strongly when women started entering the work force. This is a fact that is taught in most colleges and many high schools.
Posted by: Mick | September 25, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Uh, Jake, you are aware that Palin isn’t a member of either body, has no standing under either House or Senate rules to be involved, and would very likely need to register as a lobbyist, seeing as she has no personal involvement with the deal and would be lobbying on another’s behalf, right?
Posted by: Charlie (Colorado) | September 25, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Shes taking an online class in remedial
world history through Phoenix University.
Posted by: Barb | September 25, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
She’s not in DC because she hasn’t been elected to serve. Yet.
Posted by: James Beam | September 25, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Did you see the transcript for her interview with Katie Couric?
If its not in the script, she doesn’t know what to say.
Posted by: Ryan C | September 25, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
“What’s he gonna contribute?”
Ask Harry Reid. He told John McCain that he had to sign off on the bail-out agreement before the dems would agree to it. Reid didn’t want the responsibility.
Then he changed his mind when McCain said he was returning to the Senate, because Reid saw the importance he had imputed to MCains presence, while not bothering to care if Obama (call me if you need me) was there or not.
As for the premise of this article, it’s ridiculous on its face. Governor Palin has no standing to work in the US Senate.
Posted by: RJ | September 25, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Gov. Palin no shows at the D.C. and be critisized by the likes of you. She shows up and no doubt she will mercilessly be critisized by MSM. Frankly, I have no idea how Gov. Palin copes with all hit jobs and smears not only directed at her but at her family. Unfair does not even begin to describe how I feel.
Posted by: Mineko | September 25, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
Life isn’t fair….for any of us right now…she CHOSE to run for VP, it was a choice ..this is not the prom, or a hockey game it’s politics….what I feel is UNFAIR is McCains incredibly poor choice as VP as she may end up as president…Now that is unfair! Charging for rape kits…please.
Posted by: Barb | September 25, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
How disingenuous of Sen. Obama, the Democrats and their supporters to now claim that a president must be able to do more than one thing at a time. Since 2005, they have all blasted President Bush for not dropping everything to deal with Katrina. Many condemned him for attending a fundraiser in San Diego the very day that Katrina hit. Yet at the time of that fundraiser, all reports were that the levees had held. It wasn’t until after the event it became clear that there were levee breaches and widespread flooding of New Orleans.
Posted by: James Danley | September 25, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Oh, your precious Obama isn’t looking like a leader, so you want to knife Palin (who isn’t, after all, a Senator or member of Congress).
Posted by: Chad3337 | September 25, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Barb
It appears to most people Obama made the poorer choice in VP. Even Biden said Hillary would have been a better choice.
Biden didn’t know FDR was not President in 1929, didn’t know they didn’t have tv’s back then, blasts Obama for an unfair ad attacking JM, claimed Obama is not ready to be President and in one week makes more mistakes than Palin has ever made.
Today there is more talk about Obama replacing his VP than JM. Now there’s judgement for you, having to replace your VP for incompetence before he even starts his job in January!
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Jake
In update#3 can you please explain why Palin needs to be in Washington but Obama does not?
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Barb,
Please google “alaska rape kits charge”.
You will find numerous fact groups including newsbusters that the charge is completely false.
If you can find any facts to support your case after reading these articles, please let me know.
If not the “rape kit” has been proven to be a false charge.
Posted by: Dave in lv | September 25, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Bob, You missed a couple of important facts. Phil Gramm wrote some bills. Remember Phil Gramm? McCain’s co-chair? The one who said that the economic problem were “mental.” Well, he wrote a deregulation bill in 1999 and then followed that one up with another one in December 2000 called the “Commodity Futures MODERNIZATION Act,” which made all of those credit default swaps possible. There is no one and I mean no one – who bears more responsiblity for this mess than Phil Gramm, John McCain’s chief economic advisor. I do not think the Democrats are blameless at all – they were certainly responsible for some of the mess. But if you think Democrats are at the lead on deregulation – I have a bridge to sell you in Alaska.
Posted by: mara | September 25, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
I think Obama is making an issue for McCain suspending the campaign. I see a legitimate reason for McCain to suspend the campaign and work with fellow republicans in the House and to a lesser degree the Senate are thinking of voting against this bill.
If McCain does not do this, Obama and Dems will get an opportunity to claim victory for this bill and point finger at republicans.
So, McCain is trying to handle genuine issue while Obama and dems are playing politics by undermining his effort.
Posted by: Tim | September 25, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
What is Palin going to do?
Nothing, she cant vote for or against the bill….she is a governor not a senator….that means she has 1/50th the voting power and experience of a senator
her only insight was to tell us that this could lead to a depression if we dont do something….thanks for the update genius, did your communications degree tell you that…..
Posted by: Oregon4Obama | September 25, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
It appears to most people Obama made the poorer choice in VP.
Today there is more talk about Obama replacing his VP than JM. Now there’s judgement for you, having to replace your VP for incompetence before he even starts his job in January!
Posted by: Dave in lv
——–
Maybe on your planet “most” people think Palin is a better choice than Biden, but not on mine.
Who is “talking” about Obama switching VP choices? Bloggers? Not Obama. It’s not going to happen. He (and I and most Dems) think Biden is a great choice!
Posted by: obamamama | September 25, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
John McCain and Joe Biden are senior members of the U.S. Senate, and should clearly be involved first hand in any decisions or discussions as relates to the currently economic crisis.
Barack Hussein Obama should probabaly be there, too, since he’s supposed to be representing his state is the U.S. Senate. But he’s only shown up 143 days total, so it’s would be unusual to have him actually showing up for work in the U.S. Senate. It’d be even more unusual if he did something when he did show up!
Gov. Sarah Palin was not elected to the U.S. Senate, and she does not currently have a role in formal discussions. This is no different than any other governor, whether it be Jimmy Carter or Michael Dukakis.
Btw, exactly what foreign policy experience did Dukakis have when the Democrats nominated him for President? None. Bill Clinton’s foreign policy experience prior to being President? Was it visiting the USSR as a college student? And Obama claims foreign policy awareness by virtue of having lived in the world’s most populous Islamic nation, Indonesia? It’s true, and it’s even on his official Barack Hussein Obama website.
Posted by: Indy Voter | September 25, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
The job description of VP is to take over for the president should the need arise. If McCain cannot debate on Friday as scheduled we should have the VP debate instead. This way we also get a preview of what we should expect if Palin has to take over for McCain.
Posted by: Obama/Biden 08 | September 25, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
Barb, contrary to what the Liberal blogs have posted Gov. Palin did NOT want the victims to pay for their own rape kits. The policy in Wasilla used to be that the hospitals would bill the victims’ insurance companies for the rape kits. Former Wasilla Police Chief, Charlie Fannon, in an interview in 2000, said: “I just don’t want to see any more burden on the taxpayer.” He ALSO said, but apparently this was omitted or ignored by the bloggers: “I’d like to see the courts make these people (criminals) pay restitution for these things.” So he wanted the criminal to be held responsible for the costs of the rape kits NOT THE VICTIMS. Then somehow the comments of the Wasilla Police Chief were attributed as being Gov. Palin’s views.
Posted by: James Danley | September 25, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
I think it is obvious why she isn’t there. If she were a capable candidate she would be in DC talking to all the reporters getting free airtime! Oh I forgot………..she isn’t allowed to speak to anyone. The fact that the McCain campaign wants to control her and Palin allowing them to control her says a lot about both McCain and Palin.
Their party looks so sad!
Posted by: karen | September 25, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
A better question is, WHy isn’t Barry O helping out!
Maybe he is helping by just keeping out of it all because he is a complete idiot when it comes to really doing Something or ANYTHING!
Just keep talking off that Tele prompter
It’s about the only thing “The One” can do at this point.
Oh, he can vote present too!
Face it, the Dems are wishing for another Depression. They love when the people are in a big hurt. That way they can blame it on the Repubs and press for more Government in everyones life. It is what SOCIALIST do.
Just look at all the Dems that helped get this to the point it is. Barney Franks, Chris Dodds, Chuck Schumer, Clinton, Carter, Jim Johnson, Franklin Raines!
Posted by: moniqueO | September 25, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
8 years of Republican corruption, secrecy, elitism, self centered greed and nepotism and here we are today, debating on wether or not to give them another chance? Has ANYONE in the middle-class ever been well off under Bush Sr. and Quayle? How about Bush Jr. and Chaney? Why in the hell would you give McPalin the same ticket to run this country more into the ground? Do you like to keep the very wealthy from paying their taxes? Do you like to borrow more from China? The Republicans today have shown nothing but the same Bush Rove spin and razzledazzle that this foul administration has excelled in.
Posted by: Conservative Not NeoCon | September 25, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Conservative Not NeoCon, the history books will one day prove you totally wrong. President Bush’s economic policies are what has gotten us, so far, through all of the hits that our economy has taken during his two terms.
The 2001 Bush tax cuts turned around the 2000-01 recession. The combination of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts greatly diminished the effect that 9/11 and the corporate scandals had on our economy. Then we actually had 52 consecutive months of job growth (September 2003 through December 2007). It was the effects of the triple whammy of the slumping housing market, the subprime mortgage crisis and skyrocketing energy prices that caused the downturn in the economy. YET in spite of these latest hits to the economy, GDP actually grew the first two quarters of 2008: 0.9% growth in the 1st quarter and 3.3% growth in the 2nd quarter.
And had the Democratics in Congress heeded President Bush’s and Sen. McCain’s warnings and calls for oversight over the past several years, instead of blocking the attempts to implement oversight, we might have avoided the current economic crisis.
Posted by: James Danley | September 25, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Why Isn’t Palin Coming to Washington to Work on the Bailout Bill?
Here’s a hint, Jake- she’s not an elected member of Congress. And if one governor were to go to Washington to deal with this- why not the other 49?
Posted by: Jen06 | September 26, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Gov. Palin’s Alaska State does not need any bailout. She ran the state well. Being faithful in little (Alaska) she will be faithful to serve in much (USA).
As she is not a representative nor Senator, she was not invited.
To get Gov Palin to clean up washington and Wall Street,
Vote McCain-Palin 08 in on November 4.
Obama is no good for the economy. He is just a “protestor” and “whinner” his whole life. Such a person cannot be good for the economy. Obama isn’t he a CEO of a large company or head of a city or a state.
There is no evidence that show that he can manage anything.
Posted by: Reuel | September 28, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am