By Natalie Gewargis

Sep 19, 2008 9:49am

WP Editorial Board Defends McCain’s Record on Regulation

The Washington Post editorial page takes a look today at the actual record of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., on regulatory oversight of the financial markets, beyond Sen. Barack Obama’s charges.

"When I was warning about the danger ahead on Wall Street months ago because of the lack of oversight, Sen. McCain was telling the Wall Street Journal — and I quote — ‘I’m always for less regulation,’" Obama, D-Ill., said in Espanola, N.M., yesterday.

But as the Post points out, (as we have before), the full quotation from McCain’s March interview with the Wall Street Journal includes McCain’s assertion:

"But I am aware of the view that there is a need for government oversight. I think we found this in the subprime lending crisis — that there are people that game the system and if not outright broke the law, they certainly engaged in unethical conduct, which made this problem worse. So, I do believe that there is role for oversight."

The Post says when it comes to regulation of the financial markets, "McCain’s record is more in keeping with his current rhetoric. In the aftermath of the Enron collapse and other accounting scandals, he was a leader, with Sen. Carl M. Levin, D-Mich., in pushing to require that companies treat stock options granted to employees as expenses on their balance sheets…

"(He) was an early voice calling for the resignation of Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Harvey Pitt, charging that he ‘seems to prefer industry self-policing to necessary lawmaking. Government’s demands for corporate accountability are only credible if government executives are held accountable, as well.’"

None of which is to say McCain isn’t now amping up his populist rhetoric and positioning; just that the record is more nuanced than Obama would have it.

Read the whole thing HERE.

- jpt

User Comments

Obama is mainly responsible for the economic crisis. Congress was bullied and intimidated into setting up the process (Research the Community Redevelopment Act) by community organizers, activist groups and that familiar outfit called ACORN to make loans to unqualified borrowers – subprime mortgages. Barack Obama did a lot of community organizing for ACORN. The Democratic plan of wealth redistribution began as the sub-prime lending era which is now the biggest disaster in economic history of the US. It is as simple as that folks. So what do the Democratic Party and Barack Obama have in store now—another “change” we can count on.

Posted by: MIke | September 19, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Jake Tapper
Welcome back.
Welcome back.
You act like a real reporter now. Keep reporting the fact, we will appreciate you.
I bet liberal & paig bloggers of Obama will stay away from this blog

Posted by: adam | September 19, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Obama is a liar that we cannot believe in. Really how low can he get?

Posted by: Carl | September 19, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Meanwhile, Odrama is gathering his top economic advisors to come up with a solution! News to Obama: IT’S A LITTLE LATE. Maybe if he spent less time with Streisand and more on being proactive it would benefit the country. Of course he will take credit for everything.

Posted by: DanP | September 19, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Jake
why has no one done a story on the fact that we have seen this story before…
Mccain and Keating and deregulation all with a trillion dollar price tag.
and now Mccain and Gramm
who wrote his economic platform after being paid 750,000 dollars just last year for lobbying for these banking and mortgage giants
the same deregulation that got us here.
How can a guy be involved with the lobbyists and people who were at the center of both of these crashes…
and NO ONE is doing a story on it.
McCain has many more times along the campaign trail said he “errs on the side of deregulation” at times calling people who thought there should be regulation were in his words “not following the American way”
somehow that has been skipped ALL of it
including we have not heard KEATIN , the elephant in the room
at all
why?

Posted by: dl | September 19, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

WP is probably in the tank
for Palin’s running mate
John McCain.
McCain has made too many
different and contradictory
policy statements over the
years and continues to do
so from one day to the next
depending on the polls.
McCain’s philosophy in his
own words:
“I am fundamentally a deregulator.”

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Odd how the democrat congress’s hands are all over these financial problems. Unemployment has gone from 4.4% to 6.1% since dems took control 2 years ago! A housing crisis, bank failures, wall street panic.

Posted by: Karen | September 19, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

We can play the blame game all day long but the fact doesn’t change that McCain’s campiagn team has 83 Lobbyist from Wall Street.
The same guys he’s badmouthing now are the same ones running his campiagn.
The Straight Talk Express has lost its wheels.

Posted by: Vanessa | September 19, 2008, 10:15 am 10:15 am

we have seen this story before
the s and l crisis
and the KEATING 5 people!
same issues…same players
including McCain.

Posted by: dl | September 19, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Jake did good job.
I think once the media covers both candidates, Obama loses the advantage.
Now I know McCain is the one actually had real idea and nerve to handle the financial crisis. He knows the economy better than Obama.

Posted by: golfgirlusa | September 19, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Jake
Gramm WROTE the Enron Loophole
so this is how John mcCain fights that?
and deregulation
he asks the guy to lead his economic team and write the policies that will oversee regulation!!!?
what are you talking about
what is the WP talking about!?

Posted by: dl | September 19, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

McCain showed the leader he is this morning by outlining a comprehensive economic plan that addresses our current crisis and averts future crises.
Obama? He’s waiting to see what everyone else says before deciding what he’d do. In other words, he’s voting “present” and proving that he’s not only a follower, but a poor one at that.

Posted by: marylou | September 19, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

McCain was found innocent of any wrongdoing with Keating. Get over it.

Posted by: marylou | September 19, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am

McCain is the chairman of
the Commerce Committee in
the Senate. He is as grossly
negligent in preventing the
crash on Wall Street as the
current chairman of the SEC.
Both the SEC chairman and
the Senator have violated
public trust and should be
fired.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Yes, typical mainstream media in the tank for Obama…
Let’s blame the victim of the crime for being violated, and not the criminal who committed the crime…………….
I read one article where the hacker stated how disappointed HE was that after he BROKE THE LAW, he found NOTHING incriminating in the emails regarding Palin………………….

Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

the economic solution is above Obama’s pay-grade!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | September 19, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

McSame is the biggest liar and cannot be trusted. How in one sentence you will promote deregulation and in the next say that there is a need for oversight from the government. that does not make sense but since it is from Mccain, it is not a real surprise. McEconomy will be the longest and largest Bridge to nowhere. God save America from McPalin.

Posted by: BKMC | September 19, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Once again, Jake seems to think a candidate, Obama, in this case, owes it to his opponent to use a three minute quote to provide us all with the full “nuance.” Jake, of course, totally overlooks McCain’s support of
a 1995 moratorium on ALL federal regulations and his persistent intervention on behalf of S&L’s and Communications companies in regulatory matters.

Posted by: ricky | September 19, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

The Do-nothing senator doesn’t know what to do except raise our taxes and destroy small businesses.
The Do-Nothing Congress admits they don’t know what to do, and they leave to go on vacation.
Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Reid controlling the Gov’t and lecturing us on how to live our lives.
Wake up America.

Posted by: riley | September 19, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Right. I’m supposed to believe Rupurt Murdoch on John McCain. John McCain has cheered on every act of deregulation – and now he wants health insurance without oversight as well.
Dan, I have some hot news – Obama is not President – GEORGE BUSH IS. A REPUBLICAN. Who inherited a deficit-free economy and drove it into the toilet with his neocon advisors. And regular people – retired teachers and nurses and factory workers are the ones who are going to pay the cost while John McCain and the other Fat Cats float through it. The Bush solution is corporate socialism.

Posted by: mara | September 19, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

“We can play the blame game all day long but the fact doesn’t change that McCain’s campiagn team has 83 Lobbyist from Wall Street.”
I guess one should mention that the biggest receivers of money from the failed mortgage insurors are Christopher Dodd and (GASP!), Barack Obama.
McCain’s speech this morning had concrete and sound plans for dealing with the crisis and stopping it from happening again. As in his choice of running mate, once again McCain demonstrates the true values of leadership, experience and personal integrity.
As always, the Obama supporters will call names, smear and omit facts to shore up his candidacy but the shine is coming off his fake emblems and fake concerns.

Posted by: len | September 19, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

McCain had received $112,000 in political contributions from Keating and his associates. Cindy McCain and her father invested $359,100 in a Keating shopping center. McCain, his family, and their baby-sitter had made nine trips at Keating’s expense, sometimes aboard Keating’s jet.
FRAUD?

Posted by: Vanessa | September 19, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

BO has voted 94 times to raise taxes.
He has to raise taxes to fund all of his wasteful earmarks.
He ranks 2nd among all politicians in the amount of contributions from Fannie and Freddie–in just 4 years.
Just look at his record to determine what kind of president he will be.

Posted by: harry | September 19, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Sounds like time for the fact checker to start the list of which candidate takes the most egregious liberty with out of context quotes. Not just the hateful stuff from the Obama camp but the real distortions they try to manufacture.
My sense is that Obama is the least honest by far

Posted by: smith | September 19, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am

di – thanks for the information. can the newsman, PLEASE at least tell us who john mccain has used as his economic advisors? we know obama’s – the same people who were in charge in the 90s. remember? when our money was worth something? and we weren’t doing socialist buyouts of international corporation? wall street has been running on crack with a credit card and so has this country. under the same people – and i will agree with mccain on this one – republican fat cats – except john mccain is one of them.

Posted by: mara | September 19, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am

So it’s supposed to be better for McCain that he takes both positions at once?
There’s a clear pattern – he’s for deregulation, until that deregulation causes a catastrophe, when he’s the first one to stand up and start pointing fingers at people who take advantage of deregulation. How about showing some leadership and saying no once in a while to corporate interests by maintaining and enforcing regulations?

Posted by: Tim M | September 19, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

McCain and four other US senators (known to history as the Keating Five) met with Edwin Gray, then chairman of the FHLBB. McCain had been hesitant to attend but had reportedly been called a “wimp” behind his back by Keating. The message to the FHLBB and Gray from the Keating Five was to lay off Lincoln and cool the investigation. Gray and the FHLBB did not relent but Lincoln stayed in business until 1989 when it collapsed with the rest of the S&L industry. The life savings of more than 20,000 elderly investors disappeared with the failure of Lincoln. Keating went to prison for five years.
Charles Keating was John McCain’s pal. They met in 1981 and Keating dumped $112,000 in the McCain campaign bank accounts between ’82 and ’87. A year before McCain met with the FHLBB regulators, his wife Cindy and her father, according to newspaper reports at the time, invested about $360,000 in one of Keating’s shopping centers. The Arizona Republic reported McCain and his wife and their babysitter took nine trips on Keating’s private jet to the Bahamas to stay at the S&L liar’s decadent Cat Cay resort. The senator didn’t pay Keating back for the plane rides until years later when he was under investigation.

Posted by: real maverick | September 19, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am

So why did McCain vote FOR Phil Grahms 1999 Deregulation Act? And why didn’t the WP report that? And why didn’t PP mention that? More baloney.

Posted by: mara | September 19, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am

It still doesn’t change the fact that he has 83 lobbyist from Wall Street on his campiagn team.
If McCain wants us to believe he’ll reform Washington then he better start with his campiagn first.

Posted by: Vanessa | September 19, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Two of Obama’s top advisors made 100′s of millions as CEO’s of Fannie Mae and Lehman Brothers. Look what happened to those companies.
Obama is 2nd in contributions received from Fannie and Freddie…..

Posted by: susie | September 19, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

McCain as chairman of the
Commerce Committee should
have known what was
happening on Wall Street.
He didn’t do his job well.
The horse has already bolted
from the stable. McCain’s
economic plan at this hour
after the meltdown is not
going to do anything much.
His 26 years in the Senate
were of no use in preventing
the excesses on Wall Street.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

have you seen the ad that accuses obama of suggesting we teach 5 year olds about sex before they learn to read? the one that KARL ROVE said went too far? did you listen t sarah palin’s acceptance speech, in which she lied at least four times, in a speech written completely by the mccain campaign? have you listened to john mccain this week at all? he has made at least five flip flops this week alone. did you read the WP piece? what it left out was a lot. like the relationship between john mccain and phil grahm and keating 5. remember that one? that little piece of republican socialism at the expense of the american people?

Posted by: mara | September 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

“If McCain wants us to believe he’ll reform Washington then he better start with his campiagn first.”
Get Obama’s advisor list and publish it. Get his birth certificate, his college transcripts, and his thesis. Spend time combing the Annenberg Challenge papers. Explain why he was hired by and worked with a man, Bill Ayers, whom Obama claimed he barely knew.
None of that is a smear. Those are the real facts of the Obama candidacy.
Get Real, Vanessa. Transparency starts at home.

Posted by: len | September 19, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

The media is reporting on Todd Palin but is silent on Hackergate.

Posted by: geevill | September 19, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

What´s the reformer record of Mr. America community organizer? ´change, change, change´ but nothing done.
Nobama = only words, no facts
Typical demagogue politician

Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 19, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Like all his other plans
his economic plan to
prevent future financial
crises is not worth a
hill of beans.
It is an expedient attempt
to fool voters that he is
on top things after the
worst has already happened.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

marylou,,
McCain as not found “innocent”….he got a wrist slap and was found to have poor “judgment”…..
he also had the closest ties to keating of any of the five.

Posted by: karen | September 19, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Palin’s running mate John McCain
has relished making the following
statement over and over about
his hands-off approach to govt
oversight of financial markets:
“I am fundamentally a deregulator.”

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

And you haven’t answered why McCain has 83 lobbyist from Wall Street on his campiagn team.
He’s bashing them one moment then seeking advice from them the next.
McCain has lost all credibility on the economy; look at the polls.

Posted by: Vanessa | September 19, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

I’ve become so cynical in this campaign cycle, that I kept waiting to read some MSM punchline in this post – jabbing at some ridiculous McCain fallacy. For once, it didn’t happen.
This brings me back to an assertion I’ve carried for some time. The Obama camp is turning to outright manipulation to paint McCain as some damaged clone of his former self. THIS is the cornerstone of a campaign to deflect from Obama’s own character flaws. “See, John McCain is no longer the maverick he once was. AND I am no longer that guy who say in Trinity’s pews and dealt with Rezko, etc. He’s changed for the worse, and I’ve changed for the better.” How do people fall for this? Ugh.
One more note on the WP article. Note again, McCain “works and plays nice with others.” Come on folks – he’s done this consistently. Levin, Feingold, Kennedy, etc. etc. Obama only plays nice with people who agree with him.

Posted by: FishMonger | September 19, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Barry is a liar.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Obama will review Hillary Clinton’s economic proposals she outlined on the Senate floor yesterday and then take them as his own. The good Senator has a pattern – listen to Clinton and then follow her lead. Pathetic.

Posted by: Kris | September 19, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

Why is John McCain’s regulatory record so contradictory? Because his mentor is Phil Gramm.

Posted by: ricky | September 19, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain’s national campaign general co-chair was being paid by a Swiss bank to lobby Congress about the U.S. mortgage crisis at the same time he was advising McCain about his economic policy, federal records show. Gramm joined the bank in 2002 and had registered as a lobbyist by 2004. UBS filed paperwork deregistering Gramm on April 18 of this year. Gramm continues to serve as a UBS vice chairman.
Some economists fault Gramm’s deregulatory successes, as well as lax enforcement of remaining oversight powers, not just for the subprime mortgage crisis, but for its spread to other sectors of finance. Even Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has expressed interest in toughening regulations.
Jared Bernstein of the Economic Policy Institute told the Washington Post, “McCain is counting on people having very short memories and not connecting some pretty obvious dots here.”
We won’t forget this old man. Many people have lost their homes because of you.

Posted by: owen | September 19, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Old style Chicago politics isn’t going to cut it, we need politicians that will work for the people. Every other word out of his mouth is a lie.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

McCain’s economic plan if
he has a coherent one will
lead to future meltdowns.
His foreign policies will
lead to future recreational
wars like Iraq.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Send the liar back to Chicago to clean up their mess.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Shame on Obama for not giving the full picture on McCain’s regulatory record on financial matters. He has not even mentioned MCain’s leadership role in the Keating Five. Fixing regulatory problems for crooks. Come to think of it, Jake and the Post failed to mention that either.

Posted by: ricky | September 19, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Hope doesn’t pay the bills. Come back when you have some accomplishments to speak of. 300 advisers and a teleprompter isn’t what we need.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am

We have enough do nothing con-men in Washington, we don’t need one in the Oval office.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Bush has full confidence
in the SEC chairman a man
he appointed.
McCain would have said
the same thing too if he
was leading in the polls.
He’s down in the polls
so he wants the SEC honcho
fired.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Freepers are so funny.
They point to a Bill in 2003 that McCain co-sponsored as proof that he did try to address regulation and oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
What they don’t realize is that that particular Bill S. 1508 [108th]: Federal Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2003 (which McCain co-sponsored)
eventually became – with minor changes – the S. 1656 [108th]: Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight Modernization Act of 2003
This Bill passed on April 1, 2004 along Party lines (Republican majority approved, Dems opposed)
What the Freepers don’t understand is that that Bill is part of the deregulation process that eventually resulted in the COLLAPS of Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac.
So Funny.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | September 19, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

McCain is a friend of
lobbyists and crooks
and has devoted his
entire senate career
fighting to keep the
government from
restricting their shady
operations.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Send Barry back to Chicago to finish what he never started. We don’t need speeches about what’s wrong we need solutions.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 11:28 am 11:28 am

geevil:
Yes, I think the reason they are so silent on the latest hacking reports regarding the Democratic Rep’s son is because it was obvious from when the hacking was first reported as to which “side” was probably responsible.
I wonder why they’re not following the trail like Woodward and Bernstein did after the Watergate break in?
You’d think they would all want the publicity and the credit for finding the criminal.

Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Blaming Democrats for this fiasco?
Nice try. The housing bubble started to burst even before they got the marginal majority they now have (starting in the summer of 2005). Regardless, the laws are in place and it is the Republican executive branch which has refused to enforce them, leading to the current crisis.
Of course as usual, Bush has pulled a disappearing act at the crisis point.

Posted by: ff11 | September 19, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Dodd and Obama, 1 and 2 in payoffs received from the failed Fannie Mae. They are part of the problem, not the solution. Hold them accountable.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

Nice to see the Post call Obama on this. His mocking and misleading sarcasm may entertain his fans, but it does nothing to address or advance the discussion of critical issues facing this country. Certainly it is the antithesis of the uplifting, new sort of politics he promised at the inception of this campaign. It seems as though the rational for the Obama candidacy is no longer clear. His conduct belies the farce of his mantra of “hope” and “change.” Now he looks like just another cynical pol willing to say anything to get elected, only he has less experience than most.

Posted by: NJH | September 19, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am

And as always, Vanessa, you answer nothing about Obama. You sling mud and hope it sticks to the faces of the voters so they won’t notice you’ve got no solutions. Just a promise of higher taxes.
Mud is how we got into the mess. Transparency and clarity of regulatory instruments could have avoided it.
“McCain has lost all credibility on the economy; look at the polls.”
This is one day where the polls are meaningless. Who cares what the pollsters are reproting when the economy is melting and the people most responsible tell us they are going to wait and see?
McCain stepped up with some real straight talk this morning. Obama is hiding out with yet another star studded cast of celebrity advisors until Nancy Pelosi can tell him what to say.
When do you finally GET IT: this is not a game of hoops for street cred. This is not World of Warcraft where you can punch buttons and achieve some egoboo. This is reality and people are losing their homes, the elderly can’t afford the gas to get to the grocery stores and for the first time, we are about to hand students a worse world than our parents handed us.
Get your mind right. Show some honor. Nothing ahead of us right now will be easy. Call it ‘jimmy carter’s sweater’ if that make you feel a bit more smug, but the facts are the facts.

Posted by: len | September 19, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

The entire regulatory
apparatus of the govt
was asleep at the switch.
Now expect every senator,
every congressman and his
brother, to offer us
prescriptions for preventing
future disasters.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Let’s see -
on LOBBYING – McCain has a rule that no current/registered lobbyists are working for his campaign, and he’s released lists of the paid/volunteer advisers working with him. Obama has no such rule and hasn’t made any list available.
on REGULATION – as WashPost points out, McCain has throughout his career balanced two principles – deregulation is best AND police/minimize significant risks. Obama has … defined some ideas for the future.
on TAXES – McCain’s plan gives everyone tax cuts across all income levels. Obama’s plan selectively raises payroll taxes on incomes over $250K, raise corporate taxes, and raise taxes on small bsuinesses.
on PARTISANSHIP – McCain has consistently shown he will break with his party on significant and controversial legislation. He’s consistently shown an ability to work with Dems to define win-win compromise legislation. Obama hasn’t broken w/the liberal wing on anything and can only point to non-controversial cross-party legislation in the Senate (i.e., was anyone against keeping terrorists from acquiring nuclear weapons)
on REFORM – McCain has shown he understands the process of politics, and is willing to reform it even against his party or his personal interests. Earmarks (none), ethics/lobbying rules, no-bid contracts, restructuring GSEs (like Fannie/Freddie) to avoid political influencing … there’s a lot there. Obama … promises he’ll do something when elected.
For all the rapturous support (some) Dems have for Obama, I really don’t see how you can support his candidacy on anything other than hope and prayers UNLESS you simply want to pay less in taxes at the expense of others, or if you toe so close to the Dem platform that you can’t see anything else.

Posted by: PTR | September 19, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am

ACORN

Posted by: cardinal | September 19, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

McCain to middle-class Americans:
I don’t know you, you don’t know me.
McCain to the crooks and the wealthy:
My friends, big tax cuts are coming
your way. I’ll keep the govt out of
your business.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Really the WaPo has actually decided to do some journalism. Wow Well just their editorial board I guess. Perhaps they could work on their reporters now if they want to ahve any credibility at all when the books are written and history judges the so called political reporting this election.

Posted by: s.b. | September 19, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

This week:
o Federal crime. Emails hacked. Obama supporters only disappointed that dirt wasn’t found. Guess what? There isn’t any. Palin is a good egg.
o CBC columnist Heather Mallick says Palin’s look is that of a “toned-down porn actress.” husband is Todd a “roughneck,” son Track is “terrified,” and pregnant teenage daughter Bristol is a “pramface,” boyfriend is a ‘ratboy’, her supporters, “white trash”, Alaska as a “frontier state full of drunks and crazy people.” and “Canada’s ugly stepchild”.
Meanwhile, Obama says nothing as usual and goes camping with celebrity advisors until Pelosi sends him instructions while the American economy melts like cheese on a flame-broiled burger.
This isn’t that complicated. We’ve been ripped off and we want
1. Our money back.
Get a clue.

Posted by: len | September 19, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am

Willem van Oranje – clever but incorrect. 1656 (and its corresponding 1508, secondary mortgage markets) never made out of committee. The more recent 2005 bill (s190, 109th) was killed by Chris Dodd … now on the Obama team.

Posted by: Lgl | September 19, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Obama lie please dont say it! Come on he is telling us the truth when he says that as a community Organizer he has more experience to be President then a Governor, or that Ayers is ok, that he is not a racist, I know his book shows that he is, but one of his 300 Advisers wrote that!
One of Obama’s advisers is responsible for the collapse of Fannie mae and walked out with over 90 million dollars!!
Does anyone think that Obama is going to raise taxes on his elitist billionaire friends??
Wake up People and stop being a Drone!!
As far as Palin the illegal act of getting her email the AP should face criminal charges, remeber when someone got a hold of a Democrat email stating to get elected attack the war and troops, get the peope aginst the war, this happened back in 2003, the Dems blew a casket about it being released and no one question the email. Funny is it not, has the Democrat party gotten so bad that corruption is expected from them?

Posted by: spock | September 19, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

you’re telling me that obama is just coming up with his plan? hahahaha

Posted by: mccain 08 | September 19, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Sorry if that offends you, Jake, but the heads are very important. Without accountability, there is no oversight worth a spit. Too many people walked out too well off for having burgled the economy and it’s time they stood before the dock and found out why we have a country founded on justice. Otherwise, this is the drug policy where the street dealers go to jail and their financiers go to fundraisers for the downtown rescue mission. If the irony of that is lost on you, you need to spend more time with the people Obama claims to be registering.

Posted by: len | September 19, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

Anon – McCain’s Commerce committee chairmanship (03-05) doesn’t cover Financial Services and markets. … that would Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, currently chaired by …. Chris Dodd since 2007.
Now, are you saying that McCain should have used his power to convene meetings about topics not in his purview years before most people had reason to worry?

Posted by: Lgl | September 19, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

If you want to go back to Jimmy Carter´s disastrous administration years, then your candidate is obviously Obama.
Mr. America community organizer = smoke

Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 19, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

There is no need to rush
a bogus economic plan out
as McCain seems to have
done.
It is not going to be
implemented. McCain has
no influence upon rescue
measures that are going
on right now. The Bush
administration is in charge.
McCain will never be an
occupant of the White House.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

After seeing Obama and McCain this independent voter has made up his mind! Obama is the better choice for our future!
No more lies! Obama 08
Because truth maters and money doesn’t trickle down it gets sucked right out of my pocket!

Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

“One of Obama’s advisers is responsible for the collapse of Fannie mae and walked out with over 90 million dollars!!”
Barry is part of the problem. He will not reform Washington, he’ll just help himself and his cronies get richer. Take a cue from the reforms that he helped to enact in Chicago….NONE

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

“the WaPo has actually decided to do some journalism.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

they are all the same -the dems and republicans, howver personally i trust mccain – i do beleive he would fight for us in office unlike obama – who reminds me a narcisist

Posted by: renka21 | September 19, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Google this:
John McCain Debates Himself on Supporting Bush
and then watch the video!

Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

When Obama was talking about what was wrong and that our futures are threatened…
McCain and his adviser told called Americans whiners!

Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Senior advisers Steve Schmidt and Mark McKinnon work for firms that have lobby for Land O’ Lakes, UST Public Affairs, Dell and Fannie Mae.

Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Republican presidents produce poor economic performance because they’re obsessed with helping the well off. Their focus is on the wealthiest 5%. At least 95% of the country does better under Democrats.

Posted by: lindy | September 19, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

If you pride yourself in being a so-called ‘de-regulator’, then you are part of the financial meltdown!
No enterprise can function successfully without EFFECTIVE rules/regulations!
Without effective rules/regulations, ANARCHY reigns! among the greedy who are addicted to wealth!
It happened during Reaganomics I, with the Savings and Loan, and McCain Keating Five Corruption Scandal!
De-regulator McCaint saw to removal of legislation that benefited his rich friends, at the expense of the taxpayers.
It is happening during bush-McCaint-Reaganomics II!
And it WILL happen again if there is a McCaint-Reaganomics III; because McCaint is hell bent on continuing the SAME FAILED POLICIES!

Posted by: Patriot | September 19, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

also i am not comfortable with the fact that Obama kept saying – i have to talk to my advisers about the situation.. this is not the Illinois senate where u can vote present .. u are running for President of the USA…
mccain at least – came out with i support a resolution trust type solution and it appears that is what teh fed and the treausry secretary are going for… i hope if mccain is elected – paulson stays… critics and all…

Posted by: renka21 | September 19, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

“also i am not comfortable with the fact that Obama kept saying – i have to talk to my advisers about the situation.. ”
He was calling Pastor Wright for spiritual guidance.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

i have to talk to my advisers about the situation.
mccain at least – came out with i support a resolution
Posted by: renka21 | Sep 19, 2008 12:36:07 PM
And you don’t think McCain talked to his advisors. McCain who admitted he knew nothing about the economy. In my opinion presidents should talk to their advisors instead of going off half cocked and not listening to anyone like Bush does. Look where that got us. It was his was or the highway. This country is not run by just 1 person.

Posted by: d | September 19, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

If you pride yourself in being a so-called ‘de-regulator’, then you are part of the financial meltdown!
No enterprise can function successfully without EFFECTIVE rules/regulations!
Without effective rules/regulations, ANARCHY reigns! among the greedy who are addicted to wealth!
It happened during Reaganomics I, with the Savings and Loan, and McCain Keating Five Corruption Scandal!
De-regulator McCaint saw to removal of legislation that benefited his rich friends, at the expense of the taxpayers.
It is happening during bush-McCaint-Reaganomics II!
And it WOULD happen again if there is a McCaint-Reaganomics III; because McCaint is hell bent on continuing the SAME FAILED ECONOMIC POLICIES of his special interest caregivers!

Posted by: Patriot | September 19, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Barry will have his plan as soon as they turn on the teleprompter.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Media blakcout of Kernellgate???????????

Posted by: geevill | September 19, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Since 1980, only 1 President has left the White House and left a budget surplus,.. that was Bill Clinton.
The President is responsible for both the good and bad. You can add any number of events that affect what happens in any president’s administration, but, as the old cliche goes…
‘the buck stops here’…. with the president
Republicans have been running the country since 2000…… Dems have had the congress barely since 2007… it’s funny to see Republicans cry like little girls when they have to account for what has happened under their
‘guidance’.
BTW: all those Repub’ talking points are old now, time for some new ones, they’ve all been shown to be the lies….
things are so bad now for McCain that one of his spokeswomen Nancy Pfotenhauer said that they now admit to repeating unproven stories and lies about Obama just because they are printed somewhere… sad… but at least she’s being honest that McCain’s campaign is lying….

Posted by: Jazzman | September 19, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

Obama misinforms, misquotes, and misleads…
So, this is supposed to be something new?

Posted by: Jayhawk | September 19, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Obama isn’t meeting with financial advisors on an economic plan, he’s meeting with his campaign staff to figure out the best way to cover up the fact that the son of a Democratic Legislator from Tennessee, who has ties to his campaign manager Plouffe, is the one who was hacking Palin’s email account.

Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

“Since 1980, only 1 President has left the White House and left a budget surplus,.. that was Bill Clinton.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

In the four years since he stepped down as Fannie Mae’s chief executive under the shadow of a $6.3 billion accounting scandal, Franklin D. Raines has been quietly constructing a new life for himself. He has shaved eight points off his golf handicap, taken a corner office in Steve Case’s DC conglomeration of finance, entertainment and health-care companies and more recently, taken calls from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters.”
July 16, 2008 WaPo

Posted by: geevill | September 19, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

It’s the same thing that’s happening now, as banks fail, and as our housing market collapses. And the people responsible for this new crisis are the ones McCain has surrounded himself with, men like Phil Gramm and his banking lobbyists. He will offer the same kind of deregulatory policies that led to the banking collapse of the early ‘90s.
All of this corporate influence should remind you a bit of a previous tale in the McCain saga, his involvement with the Keating 5. Charles Keating was a sort of mentor of John McCain, donating vast sums of money to his senate campaigns.
Charles Keating helped out Senator McCain a lot in the early part of his career. … Senator McCain was the closest of any of the Keating Five to Charles Keating.
But Keating was in trouble. His company, Lincoln Savings and Loan, was making a lot of risky investments, and the government was investigating.
Keating raised $1.3 million for them. They challenged regulators who were investigating his operations.
So Keating called some of his old pals in the Senate to put a little pressure on the government regulator and get them off his back. McCain accepted.
Lincoln collapsed, leading to a bailout of $2.8 billion in taxpayer money. Keating went to prison for four years.

Posted by: Jazzman | September 19, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

“Obama isn’t meeting with financial advisors on an economic plan, he’s meeting with his campaign staff to figure out the best way to cover up the fact that the son of a Democratic Legislator from Tennessee, who has ties to his campaign manager Plouffe, is the one who was hacking Palin’s email account.”
The silence from the MSM on this is deafening. They have all of their staff up in Alaska trying to dig up dirt on Palin.

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

geevil:
That does appear to be the case….

Posted by: SandyB | September 19, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

“Franklin D. Raines has been quietly constructing a new life for himself. He has shaved eight points off his golf handicap, taken a corner office in Steve Case’s DC conglomeration of finance, entertainment and health-care companies and more recently, taken calls from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters.”
This is the change that we’ve all been waiting for?

Posted by: Mack | September 19, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Where’s the bailout for unemployed/”under”employed/just-plain- poor people who’ve been keeping body and soul together with the credit cards by which the Biden family, among many other “Democratic” frauds, has lived so well?
So much attention to capital, so little to surplus labor.
They had damned well better do something for the poor and near-poor, and be quick about it. Starting with food and ACTUAL medical care would be logical, followed by moveable “green” housing to replace the tent cities sprouting up everywhere.
Otherwise, this electoral-rule-cancelling descent into fascism is NOT going to work out well.

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

So much misinformation and hate spewed from Republicans here…
Obama get my vote because money doesn’t trickle down it gets sucked up.
Anyone want to argue different ?

Posted by: Andrew | September 19, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Mack:
re:”best way to cover up the fact that the son of a Democratic Legislator from Tennessee, who has ties to his campaign manager Plouffe, is the one who was hacking Palin’s email account.”
So… Obama is responsible for what someone’s kid does? Really?
Neil Bush was a member of the board of directors of Denver-based Silverado Savings and Loan during the 1980s’ larger Savings and Loan crisis. As his father was Vice President of the United States, his role in Silverado’s failure was a focal point of publicity. According to a piece in Salon, Silverado’s collapse cost taxpayers $1 billion.[2]
The US Office of Thrift Supervision investigated Silverado’s failure and determined that:
Bush had engaged in numerous “breaches of his fiduciary duties involving multiple conflicts of interest.”
Bush was reprimanded by the Office of Thrift Supervision for “multiple conflicts of interest” as a paid director of the S&L, including his approval of $132 million in loans from Silverado to two business partners, Bill Walters and Kenneth Good, Bush, in turn, had received $550,000 in salaries .
Although Bush was not indicted on criminal charges, a civil action was brought against him and the other Silverado directors by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; it was eventually settled out of court, with Bush paying $50,000 as part of the settlemen.
A Republican fundraiser set up a fund to help defer costs Neil incurred in his S&L dealings.
I don’t remember the Bush family paying back anything for Silverado….amazing how when your father is V.P… things go a lil bit easier for you

Posted by: Jazzman | September 19, 2008, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

“more nuanced?”
Looks pretty black and white to me…McCain was prescient on this issue and called for oversight. Just admit it.

Posted by: Wade | September 19, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

“McCain was prescient on this issue and called for oversight. Just admit it.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Senator Phil Gramm, creator of McCain’s economic policy, said that the recession was just in our heads and we were a nation of whiners. I am wondering if that includes all the filthy rich CEOs and investors that just got a bailout at the expense of my rapidly dwindling bank account?

Posted by: Ann | September 19, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

“Barry will have his plan as soon as they turn on the teleprompter.”
Did anyone see Obama’s press conference today? He CANNOT speak fluidly without a teleprompter! He just read from a speech (that he obviously didn’t write) where he studdered and messed up the entire time. He still hasn’t come up with an economic solution/plan.
When McCain had his conference earlier today, he was obviously more prepared (because he has more experience) and more passionate about finding a solution to this economic crisis than Obama has ever been.
MCAIN/PALIN have my vote!!!
Hey Jake, why haven’t you done a story on the hacking job someone did to Palin?

Posted by: ohiogirl | September 19, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

jpt writes:
“None of which is to say McCain isn’t now amping up his populist rhetoric and positioning; just that the record is more nuanced than Obama would have it.”

Posted by: Belle Starr | September 19, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

What has Senator Obama and Senator Biden ever done to demonstrate leadership on the economy? Nothing you say? Well, that’s right.
All we get is hope and change. Senator Obama hopes you buy his hype while change is the only thing that would be left in your pocket after his taxes.

Posted by: Captain America | September 19, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

So which is it, less regulation or not less regulation? The Post Editorial was classic in that it highlighted all these blatantly inconsistent but yet stridently absolutist assertions by John McCain, and then neglected to point out the obvious.
The man seems to only know what he’s been told, to have no real moorings of his own, and, relatedly, to forget himself quite frequently along the way. How else can you explain surrounding yourself with wacky ideologues like Phil Gramm and Norman Podhoretz after their eight years in which their philosophies have respectively been exposed and discredited?

Posted by: Dan Hunt | September 19, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

why all this ? john mccain is a fairly conservative republican and always has been . i totally understand his wanting more oversight ,for many reasons ,some good for this country and some just good for himself and the republicans.
he couldnt believe just that his party got so enamored with allowing wall street and the insured banking industry to merge (most of them ,republicans that is, getting rich(er) in the process ) they lost sight of what a conservative is, and i think he never has been anything but ,financially especially.
john mccain ,whatever else he is ,is a real american patriot ,like gw bush sr.
i have never believed either of these men would do knowingly do anything to hurt this country. the keyword there is “knowingly” .
to be ignorant , even while trying their best to make up for lack of understanding might be ok for somethings ,but as chuck rangel pointed out yesterday or the day before ,the presidency of the united states of america is a job tht neither of those 2 (mccain/palin) are ready for.
i am a liberal but i respect the military greatly and both men served with honor. mccain would be a man i could vote for perhaps IF there was not a better man for the country OVERALL as an alternative.
obama isnt perfect ,he isnt that much more appealing to me than any other career politician ,but i really believe he will have the most innovative and energizing agenda between the 2.
i personally could cross any party line for the right candidate though . if the republicans wouldve run condi , i would probably have to vote for her twice! but…not mccain/palin

Posted by: bah | September 19, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

btw i meant bush sr and mccain served with honor etc…

Posted by: bah | September 19, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Barry is consulting his advisor, James Johnson, chairman and chief executive officer of Fannie Mae and managing director with Lehman Brothers.
After he has been told what to say, he´ll come back and read us the teleprompter: ´About de crisis of Wall Street I have to say … mmm …. that CHANGE is the best´

Posted by: Stephen from Indiana | September 19, 2008, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Sen. John McCain is a johnny come lately to this issue or has the media forgotten?

Posted by: Katherine | September 19, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

hey jazzman your right family connections help just look at penny pritzger and superior bank,they are paying the feds 460million to keep her from prosicution but i guess its worse that neil bush had to pay 50 thousand.with logic like that i really look forward to obamas accounting methods.

Posted by: don tufts | September 19, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

McCain is a great hindsight problem solver! Right after the SEC allowed expiration of a temporary prohibition of naked short selling to expire (just in time for Lehman to be forced into bankruptcy due to illegal short-selling), McCain demands the SEC’s idiots get canned. Where was his outrage last month before the crisis?
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | September 19, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

Stephen from Indiana,
“Barry is consulting his advisor, James Johnson, chairman and chief executive officer of Fannie Mae and managing director with Lehman Brothers.”
Duh, that’s WHY the Fed forced Lehman and Fannie out. Republicans are vindictive. They are so vindictive that they crushed companies that so many people invested their life-savings in. Can we say partisan politics have infected thriving businesses AND created some new poor people in the blind pursuit of revenge?
Obama was right. Don’t just get rid of the republican SEC head, throw them all out on their ears. Hard-working Americans deserve so much better than this and Michelle Obama was right. America is a mean and nasty country once the blinders are off.
Obama/Biden 08!

Posted by: Common Sense | September 19, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

TALK LIKE YOU HAVE SENSE,LOOK AT THE CFLINTON ADM,1995 IF YOU CAN.AND BE FAIR,CALL A SPADE A SPADE.

Posted by: fredere | September 19, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

McCain has lost the plot.
Palin is dropping in the
polls.
The convention bounce has
disappeared. Republican
policies have run the
economy to the ground.
Even if he goes to the
gates of Hell and catches
Osama bin Laden, McCain will
lose this election.

Posted by: anon | September 19, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Wow. Did read the same newspaper? This Friday, September 19, the WSJ printed a piece which excoriated McCains. Reporting on mcCain’s comments on the SEC chairman, they said, and I quote: “Wow. “Betrayed the public’s trust.” Was Mr. Cox dishonest? No. He merely changed some minor rules, and didn’t change others, on short-selling. String him up! Mr. McCain clearly wants to distance himself from the Bush Administration. But this assault on Mr. Cox is both false and deeply unfair. It’s also un-Presidential.”In a crisis, voters want steady, calm leadership, not easy, misleading answers that will do nothing to help. Mr. McCain is sounding like a candidate searching for a political foil rather than a genuine solution.” Why was another editorial cherry-picked because it presented McCain in a more favorable light. When you are a conservative Republican and Pupert Murdoch’s paper is calling you unpresidential you are in big trouble.

Posted by: mara | September 20, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

TJ
yea Anon is full of it.. the electoral count is the only thing to watch from here till election day

Posted by: staniam | September 20, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Did we read the same paper? On Friday, the WSJ excoriated McCain. Here is exactly what the WSJ printed: ” Wow. “Betrayed the public’s trust.” Was Mr. Cox dishonest? No. He merely changed some minor rules, and didn’t change others, on short-selling. String him up! Mr. McCain clearly wants to distance himself from the Bush Administration. But this assault on Mr. Cox is both false and deeply unfair. It’s also un-Presidential.”

Posted by: mara | September 20, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

mara
Mccain did that because Obama can be tied to wall st more closely…Obama has more investment lobbyists working for him and has taken more money this year from investment firms… hes just a poltician like everyone else

Posted by: staniam | September 20, 2008, 12:04 am 12:04 am

I am glad the media is now fact checking all these accusations. This is this greatest service they could offer the American electorate. There is a reason Joe Biden and the Clinton’s as well as many others admire John McCain. It’s simple– he has a record of being a moderate, fair politician and someone who will stand up for what he believes is right even if it’s unpopular. McCain isn’t radically right or radically left. He’s in the middle and obviously loves this country very much. With not great ambitions left but to serve his country, McCain may be the wise choice in this time of crisis.

Posted by: rafraf | September 20, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

This was first post I saw defending McCain. Others stated he has always supported deregulation. But this is nothing unusual for John McCain – he does change stances all the time. He seems to go back and forth and depends upon who he speaks with or crowd he addresses. His vote history is for deregulation. Republicans are too.
I am very upset at the Republicans and the stock market crisis!!

Posted by: Sharonklim | September 21, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.